def14a
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission
only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
Rule 14a-11(c)
or
Rule 14a-12
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in
Its Charter)
Not Applicable
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount previously paid:
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement no.:
|
* * * * *
ART
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
ONE MAIN STREET
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02142
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Art Technology Group, Inc. on May 22, 2008.
We will hold the meeting at 10:00 a.m., Eastern time, at
the offices of Foley Hoag LLP, 155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston,
Massachusetts. Annual meetings play an important role in
maintaining communications and understanding among our
management, board of directors and stockholders, and I hope that
you will be able to join us.
On the pages following this letter you will find the Notice of
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which lists the matters to be
considered at the meeting, and the proxy statement, which
describes the matters listed in the Notice. We have also
enclosed our 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders.
If you were a stockholder of record as of the close of business
on March 31, 2008, the record date for voting at the
meeting, we have enclosed your proxy card, which allows you to
vote on the matters considered at the meeting. Simply mark, sign
and date your proxy card, and then mail the completed proxy card
to our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.,
in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. You may also submit your
proxy electronically via the Internet or by telephone as
described on the enclosed proxy card. You may attend the meeting
and vote in person even if you have sent in a proxy card or
submitted your proxy electronically.
If your shares are held in street name, that is, in
the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will
receive instructions from the holder of record that you must
follow in order for your shares to be voted.
Sincerely yours,
Robert D. Burke
Chief Executive Officer and President
THE
ABILITY TO HAVE YOUR VOTE COUNTED AT THE MEETING IS AN
IMPORTANT STOCKHOLDER RIGHT, AND I HOPE YOU WILL CAST
YOUR VOTE IN PERSON OR BY PROXY REGARDLESS
OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU HOLD.
ART
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
One Main Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Notice of
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
|
Time and Date
|
|
10:00 a.m., Eastern time, on May 22, 2008 |
|
Place
|
|
Foley Hoag LLP
155 Seaport Boulevard
Boston, Massachusetts |
|
Items of Business
|
|
At the meeting, we will ask you and our other stockholders to: |
|
|
|
(1) Elect Michael A. Brochu, Robert D. Burke and Mary E.
Makela as Class III directors of the Company to serve until
the 2011 Annual Meeting or until their successors are elected
and qualified.
|
|
|
|
(2) Approve the further amendment and restatement of our
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
|
(3) Ratify the appointment by our audit committee of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
(4) Transact any other business properly presented at the
meeting.
|
|
Record Date
|
|
You may vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of
business on March 31, 2008. |
|
Proxy Voting
|
|
It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the
meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please
mark, sign, date and promptly mail your proxy card to our
transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope. Alternatively, you may submit
your proxy via the Internet or by telephone by following the
directions on the enclosed proxy card. You may revoke your proxy
at any time before its exercise at the meeting. You may revoke
electronic votes by using the same method as your original vote
and making any changes you deem necessary. |
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Julie M.B. Bradley
Secretary
Cambridge, Massachusetts
April 21, 2008
PROXY
STATEMENT
For the
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
APPENDIX A: Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE MEETING
This
Proxy Statement
We have sent you this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy
card because our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to
vote at our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any
adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The meeting will be
held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern time, on Thursday, May 22,
2008, at the offices of Foley Hoag LLP, 155 Seaport Boulevard,
Boston, Massachusetts.
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY STATEMENT summarizes information about the proposals
to be considered at the meeting and other information you may
find useful in determining how to vote.
|
|
|
|
THE PROXY CARD is the means by which you actually authorize
another person to vote your shares in accordance with the
instructions.
|
Our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in
person or by telephone, mail, electronic mail, the Internet,
facsimile or telegram. We will pay the expenses of soliciting
proxies, although we will not pay additional compensation to
these individuals for soliciting proxies. We will request banks,
brokers and other nominees holding shares for a beneficial owner
to forward copies of the proxy materials to those beneficial
owners and to request instructions for voting those shares. We
will reimburse these banks, brokers and other nominees for their
related reasonable expenses. We have not retained the services
of any proxy solicitation firm to assist us in soliciting
proxies.
We are mailing this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card
to stockholders for the first time on or about April 23,
2008. In this mailing, we are also sending you a copy of our
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Who May
Vote
Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business
on March 31, 2008 are entitled to one vote per share on
each matter properly brought before the meeting. The proxy card
states the number of shares you are entitled to vote.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be available at the
meeting. In addition, you may contact our Secretary at Art
Technology Group, Inc., One Main Street, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, 02142, to make arrangements to review a copy of
the stockholder list at our offices before the meeting, between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Eastern time, on
any business day from May 12, 2008 up to the time of the
meeting.
1
How to
Vote
You may vote your shares at the meeting in person or by proxy:
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder of record: Shares registered in your
name. If you are a stockholder of record, that
is, your shares are registered in your own name, not in
street name by a bank or brokerage firm, then you
can vote in any one of the following four ways:
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
You may vote by mail. To vote by mail, you mark, sign and date
the enclosed proxy card and then mail the proxy card to our
transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. in the
enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. The persons named in the
proxy card will vote the shares you own in accordance with your
instructions on the proxy card you mail. If you return the proxy
card but do not give any instructions on one or more of the
matters described in this proxy statement, then the persons
named in the proxy card will vote your shares in accordance with
the recommendations of our board of directors. Our board of
directors recommends that you vote FOR each
of the nominees listed in Proposal One and that you vote
FOR Proposals Two and Three.
|
|
|
2.
|
You may vote over the Internet. If you have Internet access,
then you may authorize the voting of your shares by following
the
Vote-by-Internet
instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.
|
|
|
3.
|
You may vote by telephone. You may authorize the voting of your
shares by following the
Vote-by-Telephone
instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.
|
|
|
4.
|
You may vote in person. If you attend the meeting, then you may
vote by delivering your completed proxy card in person or by
completing a ballot at the meeting. Ballots will be available at
the meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial owner: Shares held in street
name. If the shares you own are held in
street name by a bank or brokerage firm, then your
bank or brokerage firm, as the record holder of your shares, is
required to vote your shares according to your instructions. In
order to vote your shares, you will need to follow the
directions your bank or brokerage firm provides to you. Many
banks and brokerage firms also offer the option of voting over
the Internet or by telephone, instructions for which would be
provided by your bank or brokerage firm on your voting
instruction form. Under the rules that govern banks and
brokerage firms, if you do not give instructions to your bank or
brokerage firm, it will still be able to vote your shares with
respect to certain discretionary items, but will not
be allowed to vote your shares with respect to certain
non-discretionary items. For example, the election
of directors is considered to be a discretionary item on which
banks and brokerage firms may vote. In the case of
non-discretionary items, the shares will be treated as
broker non-votes. Broker non-votes
are shares that are held in street name by a
bank or brokerage firm that indicates on its proxy that it does
not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter.
|
2
If you wish to come to the meeting to personally vote your
shares held in street name, then you will need to
obtain a proxy card from the holder of record of your shares
(i.e., your bank or brokerage firm).
Even if you complete and return a proxy card or submit your
proxy electronically, you may revoke it at any time before it is
exercised by taking one of the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
send written notice to our Secretary at our address, which you
can find at the top of the first page of this proxy statement;
|
|
|
|
send us another signed proxy with a later date;
|
|
|
|
log on to the Internet the same way you did originally and
change your votes;
|
|
|
|
call the telephone number listed on the proxy card; or
|
|
|
|
attend the meeting, notify our Secretary that you are present,
and then vote by ballot.
|
Quorum
Required to Transact Business
At the close of business on March 31, 2008,
128,746,546 shares of our common stock were outstanding.
Our by-laws require that a majority of the shares of our common
stock outstanding on that date be represented, in person or by
proxy, at the meeting in order to constitute the quorum we need
to transact business. We will count abstentions and broker
non-votes in determining whether a quorum exists.
Broker non-votes are shares that are held in
street name by a bank or brokerage firm that
indicates on its proxy that it does not have discretionary
authority to vote on a particular matter.
DISCUSSION
OF PROPOSALS
Proposal One:
Election of Class III Directors
The first proposal on the agenda for the meeting is the election
of three Class III directors for a three-year term
beginning at the meeting and ending at our 2011 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Governance Committee, the board has nominated Michael A. Brochu,
Robert D. Burke and Mary E. Makela, the current Class III
directors, for re-election. Brief biographies of
Messrs. Brochu and Burke and Ms. Makela follow.
|
|
|
Michael A. Brochu |
|
Mr. Brochu has served as a director since November 2004,
when he was added to our board in connection with our
acquisition of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. From November
1997 until our acquisition of Primus in November 2004,
Mr. Brochu served as the President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Primus. Beginning in
December 2003, Mr. Brochu served as a director of Loudeye
Corp., and beginning in February 2005, Mr. Brochu served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of |
3
|
|
|
|
|
Loudeye Corp. In October 2006, Loudeye Corp. was acquired by
Nokia Corp. and Mr. Brochu left Nokia Corp. in December
2006. Since June 2007, Mr. Brochu has been President, Chief
Executive Officer, and a director of Global Market Insite.
Mr. Brochu is 54 years old. |
|
Robert D. Burke |
|
Mr. Burke has served as our Chief Executive Officer and
President and as a director since December 2002. From November
2000 through November 2002, Mr. Burke served as Chief
Executive Officer of Quidnunc Group Ltd., a customer solutions
and services company. From June 1999 through October 2000,
Mr. Burke served as President, Worldwide Services Division
of ePresence, Inc., formerly Banyan Systems, Inc., an online
security and identity management company. Mr. Burke is
53 years old. |
|
Mary E. Makela |
|
Ms. Makela has served as a director since July 2002. Since
1994, Ms. Makela has provided management consulting
services to Chief Executive Officers, and various for profit and
non-profit boards of directors. Ms. Makela formerly served
as President of Cognos Corporation and President and Chief
Executive Officer of IMC Systems. Ms. Makela is
65 years old. |
We expect that Messrs. Brochu and Burke and Ms. Makela
will be able to serve if elected. If any of them is not able to
serve, proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee. You can
find more information about Messrs. Brochu and Burke,
Ms. Makela and our other directors, including brief
biographies and information about their compensation and stock
ownership, in the sections of this proxy statement entitled
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,
COMPENSATION OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
and INFORMATION ABOUT STOCK OWNERSHIP.
The nominees receiving the greatest number of votes cast will be
elected as directors. We will not count abstentions when we
tabulate votes cast for the director election. Brokers have
discretionary voting power with respect to director elections.
Our board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the election of Messrs. Brochu and Burke
and Ms. Makela.
Proposal Two:
Approve the Further Amendment and Restatement of the Amended and
Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan.
The board of directors believes that it would be in the best
interests of our stockholders to further amend and restate our
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996
Plan), including to increase the number of shares of
common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to awards under
the 1996 Plan from 25,600,000 to 32,000,000 shares.
4
Reasons
Underlying Proposal Two
Our board believes that the strength of our company depends, in
large part, upon our ability to attract and retain qualified,
high-performing employees and managers. Equity awards provide
our employees and managers with a financial stake in our
success, can serve to be an effective retention tool that
encourages and rewards performance, and are an important part of
the incentives that we can provide. Qualified individuals expect
and require public companies to provide equity incentive awards
in connection with employment, and such equity compensation
aligns the interests of the companys executives and
employees with stockholders interests.
On April 17, 2008, our board of directors voted to amend
and restate our 1996 Plan to increase the number of shares
authorized for issuance under our 1996 Plan from
25,600,000 shares to 32,000,000 shares. In addition,
our board of directors voted to amend and restate our 1996 Plan
to provide that shares that are subject to stock-settled share
appreciation rights that were not issued upon the net settlement
of such awards, as well as shares delivered to or withheld by us
to pay withholding taxes related to a stock option or stock
appreciation right award, will not be available for reissuance
under the 1996 Plan. These two amendments were the only changes
made to the 1996 Plan.
Before adopting the amendment to the 1996 Plan described above,
our board of directors reviewed managements projections of
the awards that we will likely issue under our 1996 Plan for
compensating new hires and existing executive officers, outside
directors, and other key employees in the remainder of fiscal
year 2008 and fiscal years 2009 and 2010. Based on these
projections, we expect that the pool of available shares
remaining under our 1996 Plan will be exhausted before the end
of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. These
projections may be affected by any acquisitions that we make. We
believe that unless this pool of shares is increased, our
ability to attract, retain, and motivate our management and
other employees will be impaired.
As of March 31, 2008, the number of shares of common stock
available for issuance pursuant to future awards under our 1996
Plan, without regard to the proposed amendment described herein,
was 1,164,390, which is approximately .90% of our total issued
and outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, we grant
awards under our Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. 1999 Stock
Incentive Compensation Plan (the 1999 Plan). As of
March 31, 2008, the number of shares of common stock
available for issuance pursuant to future awards under our 1999
Plan was 914,138, which is approximately .70% of our total
issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
In 2007, we granted awards that reduced the number of shares
available under our 1996 Plan by 3,030,548 shares and under
our 1999 Plan by 1,287,750 shares, resulting in a reduction
of 4,318,298 shares available under the two plans. In 2007,
awards counting as 708,929 shares against the 1996 Plan
limit and 430,753 shares against the 1999 Plan limit were
forfeited, resulting in an increase of 1,139,682 shares
available under the two plans. From January 1 to March 31,
2008, we granted awards that reduced the number of shares
available under our 1996 Plan by 3,208,048 shares and under
our 1999 Plan by 413,750 shares, resulting in reduction of
3,621,798 shares available under the two plans. For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, awards counting as
420,308 shares against the 1996 Plan limit and
140,971 shares against the 1999 Plan limit were forfeited,
resulting in an increase of 561,279 shares available under
the two plans.
5
Other than stock options and stock appreciation rights, awards
under the 1996 Plan reduce the number of shares available under
the 1996 Plan by 1.24 shares for each share subject to the
award.
Other
reasons to seek stockholder approval
Stockholder approval of the proposed increase to the maximum
number of shares of our common stock issuable under our 1996
Plan would also have certain tax benefits. Our 1996 Plan allows
us to award incentive stock options, which receive
favorable tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code. The
stock option grants under our 1996 Plan that are enabled by the
proposed increase of the maximum number of shares available for
issuance under the plan cannot qualify as incentive stock
options unless the increase is approved by our stockholders.
Additionally, our 1996 Plan is also specifically designed to
preserve our ability to deduct the compensation we pay certain
executive officers for income tax purposes. Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code generally prevents us from
deducting more than $1.0 million in compensation each year
for each of our five most highly compensated executive officers.
Compensation treated as qualified performance-based
compensation under Section 162(m) is not subject to
this limitation. Awards granted under our 1996 Plan that are
enabled by the proposed increase of the maximum number of shares
available for issuance under the plan may be treated as
qualified performance-based compensation only if the
increase is approved by a majority vote of our stockholders.
Finally, as an issuer listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, we are
required by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market to seek
stockholder approval of any material amendment to any stock
option or purchase plan or other equity compensation arrangement
under which our executive officers, non-employee directors, or
other employees may acquire shares of our common stock.
Description
of the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan
The following is a brief summary of the 1996 Plan as amended and
restated by our Board of Directors on April 17, 2008. The
following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the 1996 Plan attached as Appendix A to this proxy
statement.
Types of
Awards
The 1996 Plan authorizes the following types of awards:
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Options the grant of options
to purchase common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock
options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986;
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified Stock Options the grant of
options that do not qualify as incentive stock options;
|
|
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights awards entitling
the holder on exercise to receive an amount determined in whole
or in part by reference to the appreciation of our common stock;
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock direct grants or sales of
common stock subject to transfer or other restrictions or
conditions determined by the board of directors at the date of
grant which count as 1.24 shares per share granted against
the 1996 Plan limit;
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Awards grants of common
stock subject to the attainment of certain performance goals
which count as 1.24 shares per share granted against the
1996 Plan limit; and
|
|
|
|
Other Stock-based Awards other awards that
are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise
based on, shares of common stock or other property, including,
for example, restricted stock unit awards, which count as
1.24 shares per share granted against the 1996 Plan limit.
|
Incentive Stock Options and Non-Qualified Stock
Options. Optionees receive the right to purchase
a specified number of shares of common stock at a specified
option price and subject to such other terms and conditions as
are specified in connection with the option grant. Options must
be granted at an exercise price at least equal to the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The 1996
Plan permits the following forms of payment of the exercise
price of options:
|
|
|
|
|
payment by cash, check or in connection with a cashless
exercise through a broker,
|
|
|
|
payment by reduction of the number of shares to be issued,
|
|
|
|
surrender to us of shares of common stock, subject to specific
exceptions,
|
|
|
|
delivery to us of a promissory note,
|
|
|
|
any other lawful means that the board of directors determines is
acceptable, or
|
|
|
|
any combination of these forms of payment.
|
Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock
appreciation right or SAR is an award entitling the holder on
exercise to receive an amount in cash or our common stock or a
combination thereof, such form to be determined by the board of
directors, determined in whole or in part by reference to
appreciation, from and after the date of grant, in the fair
market value of a share of common stock.
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock
awards entitle recipients to acquire shares of common stock,
subject to our right to repurchase all or part of such shares
from the recipient at their issue price or other stated or
formula price, or to require forfeiture of such shares if issued
at no cost, in the event that the conditions specified in the
applicable award are not satisfied prior to the end of the
applicable restriction period established for such award.
Performance Share Awards. The board of
directors or an authorized committee of the board may grant
performance accelerated restricted stock awards, or PARS, that
provide for time vesting with acceleration of vesting if certain
performance criteria are met. In addition to PARS, the board, or
an authorized committee of the board, may grant restricted stock
awards that vest solely upon satisfaction of certain performance
criteria. The performance criteria for each restricted stock
7
award that vests solely upon performance criteria will be based
on one or more of the following measures:
|
|
|
|
|
earnings per share,
|
|
|
|
return on average equity or average assets with respect to a
pre-determined peer group,
|
|
|
|
earnings,
|
|
|
|
earnings growth,
|
|
|
|
revenues,
|
|
|
|
expenses,
|
|
|
|
stock price,
|
|
|
|
market share,
|
|
|
|
return on sales, assets, equity or investment,
|
|
|
|
regulatory compliance,
|
|
|
|
improvement of financial ratings,
|
|
|
|
achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives,
|
|
|
|
total stockholder return,
|
|
|
|
net operating profit after tax,
|
|
|
|
pre-tax or after-tax income,
|
|
|
|
cash flow, or
|
|
|
|
such other objective goals established by the board.
|
The board, or an authorized committee of the board, may
determine that special one-time or extraordinary gains, losses,
or expenses should or should not be included in the calculation
of such measures. The board believes that disclosure of further
detail concerning the performance criteria may be confidential
commercial or business information, the disclosure of which
would adversely affect us.
Other Stock-Based Awards. Under the 1996 Plan,
the board of directors has the right to grant other awards based
upon the common stock having such terms and conditions as the
board may determine, including the grant of shares based upon
certain conditions and the grant of securities convertible into
common stock. These include restricted stock unit awards, which
entitle the recipient to receive shares of common stock to be
delivered in the future subject to such terms and conditions on
the delivery of the shares as the board of directors may
determine. As described in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, we began using restricted stock unit awards in
fiscal 2007 as our primary form of equity compensation for
employees. In some cases, we issue restricted stock unit awards
with simple service-based vesting and at other times we have
issued
8
restricted stock unit awards with performance-based vesting,
using similar criteria to those that described above for
performance share awards.
Eligibility
to Receive Awards
Our employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors and
employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of our
subsidiaries and other business ventures in which we have a
controlling interest are eligible to be granted awards under the
1996 Plan. Under present law, however, incentive stock options
may only be granted to our employees and employees of our
subsidiaries. The maximum number of shares with respect to which
awards may be granted to any participant under the 1996 Plan may
not exceed 1,000,000 shares per calendar year.
Plan
Benefits
As of March 31, 2008, approximately 467 employees and
directors were eligible to receive awards under the 1996 Plan.
This includes our five named executive officers and seven
non-employee directors. The granting of awards under the 1996
Plan is discretionary, and we cannot now determine the number or
type of awards to be granted in the future to any particular
person or group.
Administration
The 1996 Plan is administered by the board of directors. The
board has the authority to adopt, amend and repeal the
administrative rules, guidelines and practices relating to the
1996 Plan and to interpret the provisions of the 1996 Plan.
Pursuant to the terms of the 1996 Plan, the board may delegate
authority under the plan to one or more committees or
subcommittees of the board. The board has authorized the
Compensation Committee to administer certain aspects of the 1996
Plan, including the granting of options and other equity awards
to executive officers, and the Compensation Committee has
granted Mr. Burke the authority to grant options and other
equity awards, subject to limitations set by the Compensation
Committee.
Subject to any applicable limitations contained in the 1996
Plan, the board, the Compensation Committee, or any other
committee to whom the board delegates authority, as the case may
be, selects the recipients of awards and determines:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of common stock covered by options and the
dates upon which such options become exercisable,
|
|
|
|
the exercise price of options (which cannot be less than fair
market value),
|
|
|
|
the duration of options (which cannot be longer than ten
years), and
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of common stock subject to any restricted
stock or other stock-based awards and the terms and conditions
of such awards, including conditions for repurchase, issue price
and repurchase price.
|
The board is required to make appropriate adjustments in
connection with the 1996 Plan and any outstanding awards to
reflect stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations,
spin-offs and other
9
similar changes in capitalization. The 1996 Plan also contains
provisions addressing the consequences of any reorganization
event, which is defined as
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation of us with or into another entity as
a result of which all of our common stock is converted into or
exchanged for the right to receive cash, securities or other
property,
|
|
|
|
any exchange of all of our common stock for cash, securities or
other property pursuant to a share exchange transaction, or
|
|
|
|
our liquidation or dissolution.
|
If any award expires or is terminated, surrendered, canceled or
forfeited, the unused shares of common stock covered by such
award will again be available for grant under the 1996 Plan,
subject, however, in the case of incentive stock options, to any
limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Amendment
or Termination
No award may be granted under the 1996 Plan after
December 31, 2013, but awards previously granted may extend
beyond that date. The board of directors may at any time amend,
suspend or terminate the 1996 Plan, except that no award
designated as subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 by the board after the date of such
amendment shall become exercisable, realizable or vested, to the
extent such amendment was required to grant such award, unless
and until such amendment shall have been approved by our
stockholders.
If the amendment of the 1996 Plan is approved by our
stockholders, the additional 6,400,000 shares of our common
stock authorized by the amendment will become available to us
under the plan starting with the date of such approval. If our
stockholders do not approve the amendment, the 1996 Plan will
remain in effect with 25,600,000 shares of our common stock
authorized under the 1996 Plan.
Tax
Withholding
Participants under the 1996 Plan are responsible for paying to
us or for making arrangements satisfactory to us regarding
payment of any federal, state, or local taxes of any kind
required by law to be withheld with respect to income from the
value of an award or of any stock or amounts received under an
award. Participants may elect to have tax withholding
obligations satisfied either by authorizing us to withhold from
shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to any award a
number of shares with an aggregate fair market value that would
satisfy the minimum withholding amount due, or transferring to
us shares of common stock owned by the participant with an
aggregate fair market value that would satisfy the withholding
amount due.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences
The following generally summarizes the United States federal
income tax consequences that generally will arise with respect
to awards granted under the 1996 Plan. This summary is based on
10
the tax laws in effect as of the date of this proxy statement.
Changes to these laws could alter the tax consequences described
below.
Incentive Stock Options. A participant will
not recognize income upon the grant of an incentive stock
option. Also, except as described below, a participant will not
recognize income upon exercise of an incentive stock option if
the participant has been employed by us or our corporate parent
or 50% or more-owned corporate subsidiary at all times beginning
with the option grant date and ending three months before the
date the participant exercises the option. If the participant
has not been so employed during that time, then the participant
will be taxed as described below under the caption
Non-Qualified Stock Options. The exercise of an
incentive stock option may subject the participant to the
alternative minimum tax.
A participant will recognize income upon the sale of the stock
acquired under an incentive stock option if sales proceeds
exceed the exercise price. The type of income will depend on
when the participant sells the stock. If a participant sells the
stock more than two years after the option was granted and more
than one year after the option was exercised, then all of the
profit will be long-term capital gain. If a participant sells
the stock prior to satisfying these waiting periods, then the
participant will have engaged in a disqualifying disposition and
a portion of the profit will be ordinary income and a portion
may be capital gain. The difference between the lesser of the
value of the shares at the date of exercise or at the date of
sale and the exercise price of the incentive stock option will
be taxable as ordinary income, and the excess gain, if any, will
be taxable as capital gain. This capital gain will be long-term
if the participant has held the stock for more than one year and
otherwise will be short-term. If a participant sells the stock
at a loss (sales proceeds are less than the exercise price) then
the loss will be a capital loss. This capital loss will be
long-term if the participant held the stock for more than one
year and otherwise will be short-term.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant
will not recognize income upon the grant of a nonstatutory stock
option. A participant will recognize compensation income upon
the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option equal to the value
of the stock on the day the participant exercised the option
less the exercise price. Upon sale of the stock, the participant
will have capital gain or loss equal to the difference between
the sales proceeds and the value of the stock on the day the
option was exercised. This capital gain or loss will be
long-term if the participant has held the stock for more than
one year and otherwise will be short-term.
Restricted Stock Awards. A participant will
not recognize income upon the grant of restricted stock unless
an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 is made within 30 days of the date of grant.
If a timely 83(b) election is made, then a participant will
recognize compensation income equal to the value of the stock
less the purchase price. When the stock is sold, the participant
will have capital gain or loss equal to the difference between
the sales proceeds and the value of the stock on the date of
grant. For a participant who has made an 83(b) election, the
gain or loss will be long term if the participant held the stock
for more than one year after the receipt of the stock. If the
participant does not make an 83(b) election, then when the stock
vests the participant will recognize compensation income equal
to the value of the stock on the vesting date less the purchase
price. When the stock is sold, the participant will have capital
gain or loss equal to the sales proceeds less the value of the
stock on the vesting date. For a
11
participant who has not made an 83(b) election, any capital gain
or loss will be long-term if the participant held the stock for
more than one year after the vesting date and otherwise will be
short-term.
Restricted Stock Units. A participant will not
recognize income upon the grant of a restricted stock unit
award. Upon receipt of shares of common stock issued when the
restricted stock units vest, the participant will recognize
ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of
the shares. Upon the subsequent disposal of the shares received
pursuant to a restricted stock unit award, the participant will
recognize capital gain or loss, as the case may be, in the
amount of the difference between the price received in exchange
for the shares and the fair market value of the shares at the
time the participant received them. The gain or loss will be
long-term capital gain if more than one year has passed since
the participant received the shares.
Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Share Awards and Other
Stock-Based Awards. The tax consequences
associated with any other stock-based award granted under the
1996 Plan will vary depending on the specific terms of such
award. Among the relevant factors are whether or not the award
has a readily ascertainable fair market value, whether or not
the award is subject to forfeiture provisions or restrictions on
transfer, the nature of the property to be received by the
participant under the award and the participants holding
period and tax basis for the award or underlying common stock.
Tax Consequences to Us. There will be no tax
consequences to us except that we will be entitled to a
deduction when a participant has compensation income. Any such
deduction will be subject to the limitations of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common
stock voting on the matter, in person or by proxy, is necessary
to approve the amendment and restatement of the 1996 Plan.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included in
calculating the number of votes cast on the proposal.
Our board believes that stockholder approval of the
amendment and restatement of the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock
Option Plan is in the best interest of our company and our
stockholders and therefore recommends that stockholders vote
FOR this proposal.
Proposal Three:
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
and the Nasdaq Stock Market, appointment of our independent
registered public accountants is the direct responsibility of
our Audit Committee. Although ratification of this appointment
by our stockholders is not required by law, our board of
directors believes that seeking stockholder ratification is a
good practice, which provides stockholders an avenue to express
their views on this important matter.
Our Audit Committee has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2008. Our board of directors
recommends that stockholders vote to ratify the appointment. If
this proposal is not approved by our
12
stockholders, our Audit Committee will reconsider its selection
of Ernst & Young, although it may elect to continue to
retain Ernst & Young. In any case, our Audit Committee
may, in its discretion, appoint new independent registered
public accountants at any time during the year if it believes
that such change would be in our best interest and the best
interest of our stockholders.
Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be
present at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to make any
desired statements or to respond to appropriate questions.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common
stock voting on the matter, in person or by proxy, is necessary
to ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our board of
directors of Ernst & Young as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2008. Abstentions and broker non-votes will
not be included in calculating the number of votes cast on the
proposal.
Our board of directors recommends that you vote FOR
the proposal to ratify the appointment by our audit committee of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31,
2008.
Other
Matters
Our board is not aware of any other matters that are expected to
come before the meeting other than those referred to in this
proxy statement. If any other matter should properly come before
the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card
intend to vote the proxies in accordance with their best
judgment.
Submission
of Future Stockholder Proposals
Under SEC rules, a stockholder who intends to present a
proposal, including the nomination of a director, at our 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and who wishes the proposal to
be included in the proxy statement for that meeting, must submit
the proposal in writing to our Secretary at One Main Street,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, no later than December 13,
2008. SEC rules set standards for the types of stockholder
proposals and the information that must be provided by the
stockholder making the request.
A stockholder may also submit a proposal to be considered at our
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to our by-laws,
which provide that the proposal must be received by our
Secretary not less than sixty days nor more than ninety days
before that meeting. This notice must include the information
required by the provisions of our by-laws, a copy of which may
be obtained by writing to our Secretary at the address specified
above. We have yet to set a date for our 2009 Annual Meeting. If
the 2009 Annual Meeting were to be held on May 22, 2009,
the anniversary of the 2008 Annual Meeting, then the deadline
for delivery of a stockholder proposal pursuant to our by-laws
would be March 20, 2009. If you submit a proposal in
compliance with our by-laws but after December 13, 2008,
then, at our discretion, we may exclude the proposal from the
proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting.
13
INFORMATION
ABOUT
OUR DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Background
Information about Directors Continuing in Office
Under our by-laws, our board of directors has the authority to
fix the number of directors, and our board is divided into three
classes serving for staggered three-year terms. We currently
have eight directors: Two Class I directors whose terms
will expire at our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, three
Class II directors whose terms will expire at our 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and three Class III
directors whose terms will expire at our upcoming 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. Brief biographies of our Class I
and Class II directors who will be continuing in office
follow.
Class I
Directors
|
|
|
John R. Held |
|
Mr. Held has been a director since July 2002. Mr. Held
formerly served as both the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Chipcom, Inc. and served in a variety of management
positions during his
14-year
tenure at Genrad, Inc. Mr. Held is also a director of BNS
Holding, Inc. Mr. Held is 69 years old. |
|
Phyllis S. Swersky |
|
Ms. Swersky has been a director since May 2000. Since 1995
she has been President of The Meltech Group which provides a
broad range of business advisory services to CEOs and Executive
Management Teams of rapidly growing businesses. Ms. Swersky
has served in various executive management positions in the
computer software and services industries including Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive
Officer. Ms. Swersky also serves as a director of venture
backed and non-profit companies. Ms. Swersky is
56 years old. |
Class II
Directors
|
|
|
David B. Elsbree |
|
Mr. Elsbree has been a director since June 2004. From June
1981 to May 2004, Mr. Elsbree was a partner at
Deloitte & Touche. He has been a member of the Board
of the New England Chapter of the National Association of
Corporate Directors and is a member of the Board of Directors of
Acme Packet, Inc. Mr. Elsbree is 60 years old. |
|
Ilene H. Lang |
|
Ms. Lang has served as a director since October 2001. Since
September 2003, Ms. Lang has been President of Catalyst,
Inc., a non-profit organization that works to advance women in
business. From May 2000 to August 2003, Ms. Lang was a
business and financial |
14
|
|
|
|
|
consultant to various boards of directors, boards of trustees,
and Chief Executive Officers. From May 1999 to May 2000,
Ms. Lang served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Individual.com, Inc., an Internet media service provider.
Ms. Lang is 64 years old. |
|
Daniel C. Regis |
|
Mr. Regis has served as our chairman since July 2005 and as
a director since November 2004. Mr. Regis served on the
Board of Directors of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. from
April 2003 until our acquisition of Primus in November 2004.
Mr. Regis is a Managing Director of Digital Partners, a
mid-sized venture capital fund specializing in Northwest
emerging technology companies, which he co-founded in 2000.
Mr. Regis is a member of the Board of Directors of Cray,
Inc. and Columbia Banking Systems, Inc. Mr. Regis is
68 years old. |
Information
about Executive Officers
Our executive officers are elected by our board of directors.
Brief biographies of our current executive officers follow.
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke |
|
Chief Executive Officer and President. You will find background
information about Mr. Burke above under
Proposal One: Election of Class III
Directors. |
|
Julie M.B. Bradley |
|
Ms. Bradley has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary since July 2005. From April
2000 to June 2005, Ms. Bradley was employed by Akamai
Technologies, Inc., a service provider for accelerating content
and business processes online, most recently as its Vice
President of Finance. From January 1993 to April 2000,
Ms. Bradley was an accountant at Deloitte &
Touche LLP. Ms. Bradley is 39 years old. |
|
Barry E. Clark |
|
Mr. Clark has been Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales
since February 2004. From February 2002 to February 2004,
Mr. Clark was President of SchoolKidz, Inc., a packaged
school supply retailer. From October 1998 to December 2001,
Mr. Clark was Division President of Domino Amjet, a
company that offers coding and printing solutions using ink jet
and laser technologies. Mr. Clark is 51 years old. |
|
Clifford J. Conneighton |
|
Mr. Conneighton has been Senior Vice President of Marketing
since December 2003. From December 2001 until December 2003,
Mr. Conneighton was an author, as well as a consultant at
Conneighton Group, LLC, a privately held management consulting
firm. Mr. Conneighton was a founder of iCOMS, Inc., an
independent
e-commerce
service provider. He served as its Chief Executive |
15
|
|
|
|
|
Officer from January 1997 to December 1999 and from January 2001
to December 2001, and as its Chief Marketing Officer from
January 2000 to December 2000. Mr. Conneighton is
58 years old. |
|
Louis R. Frio Jr. |
|
Mr. Frio has been Senior Vice President of Services since
July 2006. From June 2004 to June 2006, Mr. Frio was
Managing Partner at Unisys Corporation where he oversaw the
integration of the security and identity access management
division of ePresence, Inc. (formerly Banyan Systems, Inc.)
following its acquisition by Unisys in 2004. From 1994 to 2004,
Mr. Frio served in a variety of positions at ePresence,
including Vice President, Consulting North America;
Vice President, Managed Services; and Director, Worldwide
Support Services. Mr. Frio is 46 years old. |
|
Patricia ONeill |
|
Ms. ONeill has been Senior Vice President Human
Resources since January 2004. From May 2000 to January 2004,
Ms. ONeill served as our Vice President Human
Resources. From April 1995 to February 2000,
Ms. ONeill was the Vice President Human Resources of
The Shareholders Services Group, a division of First Data
Corporation. Ms. ONeill is 59 years old. |
|
Andrew M. Reynolds |
|
Mr. Reynolds has been Senior Vice President of Corporate
Development since July 2007. From September 2002 to June 2007,
Mr. Reynolds was Vice President of Corporate Development at
Hyperion Solutions, a provider of business performance
management solutions. From December 1999 to February 2002,
Mr. Reynolds was Director of Corporate Strategy of CMGI,
Inc., a technology holding company and venture capital firm.
Mr. Reynolds is 40 years old. |
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe |
|
Mr. Volpe has been Senior Vice President, Products and
Technology since September 2004. From November 2003 to September
2004, Mr. Volpe served as our Vice President and General
Manager, Platform Products. From June 1999 to November 2003,
Mr. Volpe served as our Vice President, Product Management,
and from September 1998 to June 1999, Mr. Volpe served as
our Director, Product Management. Mr. Volpe is
42 years old. |
16
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
General
We believe that good corporate governance is important to ensure
that Art Technology Group, Inc. is managed for the long-term
benefit of our stockholders. During the past few years, under
the leadership of our Nominating and Governance Committee, we
have continued to review our corporate governance policies and
practices, comparing them to those suggested by various
authorities in corporate governance and the practices of other
public companies. We have also continued to review the
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the new and
proposed rules of the SEC and the new listing standards of the
Nasdaq Stock Market.
Board and
Committee Meetings
The board of directors has responsibility for establishing broad
corporate policies and reviewing our overall performance rather
than day-to-day operations. The boards primary
responsibility is to oversee our management and, in so doing,
serve the best interests of the company and our stockholders.
The board selects, evaluates and provides for the succession of
executive officers and, subject to stockholder election,
directors. It reviews and approves corporate objectives and
strategies, and evaluates significant policies and proposed
major commitments of corporate resources. Management keeps the
directors informed of our activities through regular written
reports and presentations at board and committee meetings.
Our board met in person or via teleconference ten times in 2007.
During 2007, each director attended at least 75 percent of
the total number of meetings held by the board and the
committees of the board on which he or she served at the time of
such meeting. The board has established three standing
committees Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and
Governance each of which operates under a charter
that has been approved by the board. Current copies of each
committees charter are posted on the
Investors Corporate Governance
Committee Charters section of our website, www.atg.com.
This includes our Audit Committee Charter, which was amended
on April 17, 2008.
A majority of our directors are independent directors under the
rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The board has determined that
all of the members of the boards Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee
meet the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market
for membership on the committees on which he or she serves.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
appointing, evaluating, approving the compensation of, and
assessing the independence of our independent registered public
accounting firm;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
overseeing the work of our independent registered public
accounting firm, which includes the receipt and consideration of
certain reports from our independent registered public
accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and our independent
registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly
financial statements and related disclosures;
|
|
|
|
monitoring our internal controls over financial reporting and
disclosure controls and procedures;
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt and retention of
accounting related complaints and concerns;
|
|
|
|
meeting independently with our independent registered public
accounting firm and management; and
|
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules
(which is included in this proxy statement under the heading
Audit Committee Report).
|
The Audit Committee met in person or via teleconference nine
times during 2007. The current Audit Committee members are
Mr. Elsbree, Ms. Makela and Mr. Regis, with
Mr. Elsbree serving as the Chair of the committee. The
board of directors has determined that Messrs. Elsbree and
Regis are each an audit committee financial expert
as defined by SEC rules.
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
annually reviewing and approving general compensation strategy
and policy as well as corporate goals and objectives relevant to
Chief Executive Officer compensation;
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the board with respect to the Chief
Executive Officers compensation;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive
officers;
|
|
|
|
overseeing and administering our stock option, stock incentive,
employee stock purchase and other equity-based plans as well as
periodically reviewing all cash and equity incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
creating succession and development plans for executives;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the board with respect
to director compensation; and
|
|
|
|
preparing the Compensation Committee report required by SEC
rules (which is included in this proxy statement under the
heading Compensation Committee Report).
|
18
The Compensation Committee met eight times during 2007. The
current members of the Compensation Committee are
Mr. Brochu, Mr. Held, Ms. Makela and
Ms. Swersky, with Ms. Makela serving as the Chair of
the committee.
Nominating
and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committees responsibilities
include:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become members of the board
of directors;
|
|
|
|
recommending to the board the persons to be nominated for
election as directors;
|
|
|
|
recommending directors for each committee of the board;
|
|
|
|
developing and recommending to the board corporate governance
principles; and
|
|
|
|
overseeing the evaluation of the board and its committees.
|
The Nominating and Governance Committee met five times during
2007. The Nominating and Governance Committees current
members are Mr. Held, Ms. Lang and Ms. Swersky,
with Ms. Swersky serving as the Chair of the committee.
Director
Candidates
The process that the Nominating and Governance Committee follows
to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests
to members of the board of directors and others for
recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate
biographical information and background material relating to
potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by
members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the
board. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee is
authorized to retain, and has from time to time retained, the
services of a search firm to help identify and evaluate
potential director candidates.
In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for
inclusion in the boards slate of recommended director
nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee will apply the
written criteria established by the board. These criteria
include the candidates integrity, business acumen,
knowledge of our business and industry, experience, diligence,
conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of
all stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee does
not assign specific weights to particular criteria, and no
particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective
nominee. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of
our directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite
mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the
board to fulfill its responsibilities.
Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Nominating and
Governance Committee for consideration as potential director
candidates by submitting their names, together with appropriate
biographical information and background materials and a
statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders
making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than 5% of
our common stock for at least a year as of the date such
recommendation is made, to Nominating and Governance Committee,
c/o Secretary,
Art Technology Group, Inc., One Main Street, Cambridge,
19
Massachusetts 02142. Assuming that appropriate biographical and
background material has been provided on a timely basis, the
Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate
stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially
the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria,
as it follows for candidates submitted by others. If the board
determines to nominate a stockholder-recommended candidate and
recommends his or her election, then his or her name will be
included in our proxy card for the next annual meeting.
Stockholder
Communications and Annual Meeting Attendance
The board of directors will give appropriate attention to
written communications that are submitted by stockholders, and
will respond if and as appropriate. Absent unusual circumstances
(or as contemplated by committee charters) and subject to any
required assistance or advice, the Chair of the Nominating and
Governance Committee is primarily responsible for monitoring
communications from stockholders and for providing copies or
summaries of such communications to the other directors as she
considers appropriate.
Communications are forwarded to all directors if they relate to
important substantive matters and include suggestions or
comments that the Chair of the Nominating and Governance
Committee considers to be important for the directors to know.
In general, communications relating to corporate governance and
long-term corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded
than communications relating to ordinary business affairs or
personal grievances, or matters as to which we have received
repetitive or duplicative communications.
Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the
board should address such communications to Chair of the
Nominating and Governance Committee,
c/o Secretary,
Art Technology Group, Inc., One Main Street, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02142.
All directors who were members of the board of directors at the
time of our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended the
annual meeting. To the extent reasonably practicable, directors
are expected to attend our annual meeting of stockholders.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all of our directors, officers and employees,
including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer or controller. Our Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Investors
Corporate Governance Conduct
section of our website, www.atg.com, and a copy is
available without charge upon request to Secretary, Art
Technology Group, Inc., One Main Street, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02142.
We will post information about any amendments to, or waivers
from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on the
Investors Corporate Governance
Conduct section of our website,
www.atg.com.
20
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2007 about the securities authorized for issuance under our
equity compensation plans, consisting of our Amended and
Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996 Plan), our
Amended and Restated 1999 Outside Director Stock Option Plan
(the 1999 Director Plan), our 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP), our Primus 1999
Non-Officer Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Non-Officer
Plan) and our Primus 1999 Stock Incentive Compensation
Plan (the 1999 Plan).
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
|
to be issued upon
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for
|
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
future issuance under
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
equity compensation plans
|
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
(excluding shares
|
|
Plan category
|
|
and rights
|
|
|
warrants and rights(3)
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1)
|
|
|
16,200,708
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
7,116,433
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders(2)
|
|
|
231,873
|
|
|
|
.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,432,581
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
7,116,433
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes outstanding options and restricted stock units and
awards from the 1996 Plan, the 1999 Director Plan, the
ESPP, and the 1999 Plan. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, there were 3,952,130 shares
remaining in the 1996 Plan; 1,101,604 shares remaining in
the 1999 Director Plan; 875,782 shares remaining in
the ESPP; and 1,186,917 in the 1999 Plan. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 there were 2,285,581 shares
either outstanding as unvested restricted stock or reserved for
issuance upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units
pursuant to these benefit plans. |
|
|
|
Under these plans, as of March 31, 2008 there were
14,142,500 options outstanding at a weighted average exercise
price of $2.70 and a weighted remaining term of 6.79 years. |
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008 there were 4,501,254 shares
either outstanding as unvested restricted stock or reserved for
issuance upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units
pursuant to these benefit plans. |
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, there were 3,979,737 shares
remaining available for future issuance under the four plans
listed above. This included 1,164,390 in the 1996 Plan;
1,101,604 in the 1999 Director Plan; 799,605 in the ESPP;
and 914,138 in the 1999 Plan. |
21
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Consists of the Primus 1999 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, which
was assumed as part of our acquisition of Primus Knowledge
Solutions, Inc. and was not approved by Primus stockholders. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the weighted average exercise price of outstanding
options to purchase 14,142,500 shares and excludes
outstanding restricted stock units to purchase 2,290,081 shares
because they do not have an exercise price. |
Audit
Committee Report
The Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements as
of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2007 and discussed
these financial statements with management. This report is made
by the members of the Audit Committee during the time of this
review of the audited financial statements. The Audit Committee
also reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and
the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards 61,
Communication with Audit Committees, or SAS 61, with
Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm for 2007. SAS 61 requires Ernst &
Young to discuss with our Audit Committee, among other things,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
methods used to account for significant unusual transactions;
|
|
|
|
the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial
or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative
guidance or consensus;
|
|
|
|
the process used by management in formulating particularly
sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the
auditors conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those
estimates; and
|
|
|
|
disagreements, of which there were none, with management about
financial accounting and reporting matters and audit procedures.
|
Ernst & Young also provided the Audit Committee with
the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees. This Standard requires auditors
annually to disclose in writing all relationships that in the
auditors professional opinion may reasonably be thought to
bear on independence, confirm their perceived independence and
engage in a discussion of independence. In addition, the Audit
Committee discussed with Ernst & Young the
independence of Ernst & Young from the company, and
considered whether Ernst & Youngs provision of
other, non-audit related services, which are described below
under Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Fees, is compatible with maintaining such independence.
Based on its discussions with management and Ernst &
Young, and its review of the representations and information
provided by management and Ernst & Young, the Audit
Committee recommended to the board that the audited financial
statements be included in the annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Audit Committee
David B. Elsbree, Chair
Mary E. Makela
Daniel C. Regis
22
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Our Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to
serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for
the year ending December 31, 2008. Ernst & Young
has served as our independent registered public accounting firm
since 2002. We expect that representatives of Ernst &
Young will be present at the annual meeting to answer
appropriate questions. They will have the opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so.
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firms Fees
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed for
services rendered by Ernst & Young, our independent
registered public accounting firm, for each of the last two
fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
Fee Category
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
1,182,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,600
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
140,700
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
26,200
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees
|
|
$
|
1,209,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,325,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees. Audit fees relate to professional
services rendered in connection with the audit of our
consolidated financial statements, the audit of
managements assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting and Ernst & Youngs audit of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, the review of the interim financial statements
included in our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
international statutory audits, regulatory filings, including
registration statements, and accounting consultations that
relate to the audited financial statements and are necessary to
comply with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
Audit-related fees. Audit-related fees are for
assurance and related services and are primarily related to due
diligence in connection with our acquisition of eStara, Inc. in
2006.
Tax fees. Tax fees are for professional
services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning
services. Tax compliance services, which relate to preparation
and review of original and amended tax returns, claims for
refunds and tax payment-planning services, accounted for $10,500
of the total tax fees paid for in 2007 and $57,600 of the total
tax fees paid for in 2006. Tax advice and tax planning services
relate to transfer pricing studies and miscellaneous items.
All other fees. Ernst & Young did
not provide any products or services to us other than the
services described above in fiscal years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006.
Pre-Approval
Policy and Procedures
The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures relating
to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to
be performed by our independent registered public accounting
23
firm. These policies generally provide that we will not engage
our independent registered public accounting firm to render
audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically
approved in advance by the Audit Committee or the engagement is
entered into pursuant to one of the pre-approval procedures
described below.
From time to time, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specified
types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our
independent registered public accounting firm during the next
twelve months. Any such pre-approval is detailed as to the
particular service or type of services to be provided and is
also generally subject to a maximum dollar amount.
COMPENSATION
OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This compensation discussion and analysis describes the material
elements of compensation awarded to each of our executive
officers who served as named executive officers during 2007.
This compensation discussion and analysis focuses on the
information contained in the following tables and related
footnotes and narrative primarily for 2007, but we also describe
compensation actions taken during 2008 to the extent that they
enhance the understanding of our executive compensation
disclosure for 2007.
Overview
and Compensation Philosophy
The boards Compensation Committee seeks to achieve the
following goals with our executive compensation programs: to
attract, motivate and retain key executives and to reward
executives for value creation. By responding to the market
pressures in the software industry and rewarding executive
performance, the Compensation Committee seeks to foster a
performance-oriented environment that is attractive to top
executive talent by tying a significant portion of each
executives cash and equity compensation to the achievement
of our performance targets.
Our executive compensation program has three elements: base
salary, cash incentive compensation and equity incentive awards.
Base salary, cash incentive compensation and equity incentive
awards for 2007 were established pursuant to our 2007 Executive
Management Compensation Plan, which was adopted on
February 27, 2007. The Compensation Committee seeks to
promote a performance-based culture among the executive
management team through the grant of variable cash compensation
and equity-incentive awards that are in line with both overall
company performance and individual performance. During fiscal
2007, equity incentives were awarded to our executives in the
form of restricted stock units, which were granted under our
1996 Plan. In prior fiscal years, we relied on stock options for
our equity incentive awards.
The Compensation Committee attempts to balance long-term equity
with short-term cash compensation and decides upon the mix of
compensation through committee discussion and individual
executive performance reviews. For instance, the Chief Executive
Officer receives a
24
360 review (a review from the board, the CEOs
direct reports, and self-assessment), which for 2007 focused on
his development of our management team, interactions with key
customers and his ability to expand market coverage. Such
reviews are important in determining what forms of compensation
will best help the executives reach the goals we set for their
performance for the year.
Target
Total Cash Compensation
Target total cash compensation for each executive is primarily
established based on peer group data. In 2007, the Compensation
Committee engaged the consulting firm Towers Perrin for advice
in determining which companies to include in our peer group and
also in the compilation of compensation data for our peer group
companies. The committee also relied on competitive reviews and
surveys by other third party firms of executives and director
compensation. The Compensation Committee has included companies
in the peer group that the committee believes are our
competitors for executive talent. This peer group includes
companies comparable in terms of revenue and employees.
Base
Salary and Incentive Compensation
Total cash compensation is divided into two components; base
salary and cash incentive compensation.
The Compensation Committee sets, or, in the case of our Chief
Executive Officer, recommends to the board, base salary levels
for executive officers each year based on a number of factors,
including the status of the competitive marketplace for such
positions, including a comparison of base salaries for
comparable positions at comparable companies within the
enterprise software industry, the scope and responsibilities
associated with the position, and the previous experience and
knowledge of the individual. The Compensation Committee has
attempted to fix base salaries on a basis generally in line with
base salary levels for comparable companies. The committee
retains discretion to respond to market pressures affecting
retention with small but meaningful compensation awards and long
term incentive grants. Base salary comparisons are based in part
on information provided by Towers Perrin to the Compensation
Committee.
Towers Perrin benchmarked the compensation of our named
executive officers against data from seventeen comparable
companies based on our size. The seventeen companies were Ariba,
Broadvision, Chordiant Software, Convera, Digital River, GSI
Commerce, Interwoven, LivePerson, Omniture, PAR Technology,
Perficient, Progress Software, RightNow Technologies, Saba
Software, Selectica, Ultimate Software Group, Inc., and
Vignette. Competitive pay data was ascertained using the most
recent annual proxy statements for such companies, as well as
published survey information focused on the broader software
industry/sector. Towers Perrin determined that actual total cash
compensation levels of our executives (including both base
salaries and non-equity incentive compensation) were generally
aligned with the peer group median of the seventeen comparable
companies. Other than Towers Perrin, we have not retained any
compensation consultant to review our policies and procedures
relating to executive compensation. We expect
25
that our Compensation Committee will continue to engage either
Towers Perrin or another compensation consulting firm to provide
advice as to executive compensation.
On February 27, 2007, our Compensation Committee
recommended, and our board of directors adopted, the 2007
Executive Management Compensation Plan (the 2007
Compensation Plan). The 2007 Compensation Plan established
criteria for awarding annual cash incentive compensation for
fiscal year 2007 to our executive officers based on a percentage
of each officers base salary. Target annual cash incentive
compensation ranged from approximately 40% to 91% of the base
salaries of our executives.
Under the 2007 Compensation Plan, we were required to achieve
greater than fifty percent of our adjusted operating profit goal
for 2007 before executive officers (other than the Senior Vice
President of eStara) become eligible to receive any portion of
their annual incentive compensation based on their individual
goals. In addition, our Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales
and Senior Vice President of Services were eligible to receive
quarterly bonuses based on metrics set forth in their plans,
irrespective of our adjusted operating profit goal. As
previously disclosed in our Current Report on
8-K dated
March 5, 2007, a portion of each executives annual
cash incentive compensation payout was based on the operating
profit and a portion was based on up to five other components
from the following list:
|
|
|
|
|
ATG Revenue (either in total or excluding eStara, depending on
the executive),
|
|
|
ATG Adjusted Operating Profit,
|
|
|
On Demand Revenue,
|
|
|
Investor Satisfaction,
|
|
|
Cash Management
|
|
|
Bookings (On Demand and License),
|
|
|
Worldwide professional services, education and hosting margin,
|
|
|
CSS Revenue,
|
|
|
Hosting Revenue,
|
|
|
Worldwide Professional Services and Education Revenue,
|
|
|
eStara Revenue and Adjusted Operating Profit, and
|
|
|
Management by Objective, or MBOs.
|
These components were weighted differently for each executive
and tied directly to the areas over which the executive has
functional responsibility. For instance, our Chief Executive
Officer had targets in four discrete areas (35% for ATG
Worldwide Product and Service Revenue, 10% for ATG Worldwide
Hosting Revenue, 35% for ATG Operating Profit and 20% for MBOs)
with a particular focus on the MBOs that can change from year to
year depending on the needs of the company. The MBOs that we
established were specific for each executive in light of his or
her responsibilities. The Senior Vice President, General
Manager, eStara was required to meet a minimum threshold of 70%
of target in each of his three components prior to payment of
any incentive compensation relating to such component.
The target payouts in the 2007 Compensation Plan were based on
achieving a certain percentage of our goals for each of the
listed performance metrics. For all officers except the
26
former Senior Vice President of eStara, no bonus would be paid
for any annual period metrices unless we achieved at least fifty
percent of our adjusted operating profit goal for 2007. If these
goals were exceeded, our executive officers would have been
eligible to receive cash incentive compensation in excess of the
target payouts. The final payout amount to our executive
officers, except our Chief Executive Officer, was approved by
the Compensation Committee, including payout of any amounts over
one hundred percent of target and partial payments when targets
are partially achieved. The final payout to our Chief Executive
Officer was approved by the board upon the recommendation of the
Compensation Committee.
For fiscal 2007, cash incentive compensation was paid to each
executive officer that was employed by the company at the end of
fiscal 2007. In addition, pursuant to the resignation letter
with our former Senior Vice President, eStara, he received
$121,373 in cash incentive compensation, despite the fact that
his employment with the company terminated on December 7,
2007. The cash incentive compensation was paid to the executive
officers in February 2008. Our named executive officers,
excluding our Chief Executive Officer and former Senior Vice
President, eStara, earned an aggregate of $518,735 in cash
incentive compensation under the 2007 Compensation Plan, as set
forth in the Summary Compensation Table on
page 29. This amount represents approximately 104% of the
named executives officers (excluding our Chief Executive
Officer and Senior Vice President, eStara) total target annual
incentive amount for 2007, based on the companys and the
executives performance relative to the companys and
the executives goals for 2007. Our Chief Executive Officer
earned an aggregate of $174,125 in cash incentive compensation
for fiscal 2007.
Equity
Incentive Awards
Our executive officers are eligible to receive stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock
units and other stock-based awards granted under our 1996 Plan.
The board, upon recommendation from the Compensation Committee,
reviews and approves incentive awards for the Chief Executive
Officer. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the
final incentive awards to the other executive officers. The
Compensation Committee and board meetings generally occur in
February of each year. Newly hired executive officers generally
receive sign-on grants at their hire dates, subject to the
approval of the Compensation Committee. In addition, the
Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, issue additional
equity incentive awards to executive officers if the committee
determines the awards are necessary for retention or to award
performance.
The equity awarded pursuant to the 2007 Compensation Plan helps
us enhance the link between the creation of stockholder value
and long-term executive incentive compensation; provides an
opportunity for increased equity ownership by executives; and
maintains competitive levels of total compensation. The number
of equity awards granted to each participant is determined
primarily based on median award values for executives in the
compensation peer group determined by the Compensation Committee
as discussed above in Target Total Cash Compensation
and the Compensation Committees assessment of each
executives past and expected future
27
performance. Options are awarded at the Nasdaq Global Market
closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant.
In fiscal 2007, we began rewarding executives with two types of
restricted stock units: 1) performance-based restricted
stock units and 2) time-based restricted stock units. The
performance-based restricted stock units vest annually at
twenty-five percent as long as a fifty percent threshold of the
yearly adjusted operating profit goal, for the year in which the
goal is made, is met. These restricted stock units will vest in
their entirety in the event that we reach a revenue goal
substantially in excess of our currently forecasted revenue. The
time-based vesting restricted stock units do not include this
acceleration feature. The time-based restricted stock units vest
25% on each of May 12, 2008, May 12, 2009,
May 12, 2010, and May 12, 2011, provided that the
executive is an employee of the Company on each of those dates.
In 2007 the board of directors awarded restricted stock units to
each of our executive officers in the amounts described below in
the table entitled Grants of Plan-Based Awards for
2007 on page 31. In addition, the board of directors
issued Andrew Reynolds stock options and time-based restricted
stock units upon his hire on July 23, 2007. The options
awarded to Mr. Reynolds in 2007 have an exercise price
equal to the closing price of our stock on the Nasdaq Stock
Market on the date of the grant.
Other
Compensation
The amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table under the
heading Other Compensation represent the value of
other compensation received, including company-paid medical,
dental, life and other insurance premiums.
Pension
Benefits
We do not provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health
coverage for our executives or employees. Our executive officers
are eligible to participate in our 401(k) contributory defined
contribution plan. In any plan year, we may contribute to each
participant a matching contribution equal to up to 50% of the
first 6% of the participants compensation that has been
contributed to the plan, up to the maximum matching contribution
permitted under the Internal Revenue Regulations. All our
executive officers participated in our 401(k) plan during fiscal
2007 and received matching contributions. We do not provide any
nonqualified defined contribution or other deferred compensation
plans.
Health
Benefits
We maintain broad-based benefits that are provided to all
employees, including health and dental insurance, life and
disability insurance, a
401(k) plan,
an employee assistance plan, and standard company holidays. We
believe that it is better to support executives and employees in
preventative measures rather than to provide only for coverage
for diagnosis and treatment of illness. We pursue this goal
through a number of methods, such as reimbursements for
physicals, fitness rooms/subsidy on health club memberships and
monthly wellness programs. We enjoy a very high enrollment in
our medical plan and have managed to keep the increase in
premiums
28
below two percent. We believe that one of the healthiest ways to
grow and retain valuable executives is to properly maintain
their health.
Chief
Executive Officer Compensation
In determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer,
the Compensation Committee selected from the same factors as it
does for the other participants in the 2007 Compensation Plan.
The Chief Executive Officers base salary for Fiscal 2007
was $350,000. The Chief Executive Officer received a cash
incentive payment for fiscal 2007 under the 2007 Compensation
Plan totaling $174,125, which represented 87% of his target
non-equity incentive payment.
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table provides information with respect to the
annual and long-term compensation earned during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 by the
following persons, who are referred to as our named executive
officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke, our Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley, our Chief Financial Officer;
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe, Barry E. Clark and Clifford J. Conneighton,
our three other most highly compensated executive officers as of
December 31, 2007; and
|
|
|
|
John Federman, who served as our Senior Vice President, General
Manager, eStara, from October 2006 to December 2007, and whose
compensation is provided only for fiscal 2007 because he did not
serve as a named executive officer in fiscal 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary($)
|
|
Bonus
|
|
($)(1)(2)
|
|
($)(1)(3)
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
($)(5)
|
|
($)
|
|
Robert D. Burke
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
206,399
|
|
|
$
|
251,775
|
|
|
$
|
174,125
|
|
|
$
|
15,284
|
|
|
$
|
997,583
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467,732
|
|
|
|
176,400
|
|
|
|
14,546
|
|
|
|
1,008,678
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,766
|
|
|
|
101,661
|
|
|
|
94,175
|
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
483,492
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,948
|
|
|
|
93,600
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
426,848
|
|
Barry E. Clark
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
60,958
|
|
|
|
142,848
|
|
|
|
234,947
|
|
|
|
18,004
|
|
|
|
691,757
|
|
Senior Vice President of
Worldwide Sales
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,623
|
|
|
|
163,000
|
|
|
|
16,081
|
|
|
|
532,704
|
|
Clifford J. Conneighton
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,575
|
|
|
|
167,250
|
|
|
|
95,938
|
|
|
|
18,331
|
|
|
|
558,094
|
|
Senior Vice President of
Marketing
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,691
|
|
|
|
89,300
|
|
|
|
16,620
|
|
|
|
509,611
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,958
|
|
|
|
150,525
|
|
|
|
93,675
|
|
|
|
16,978
|
|
|
|
554,459
|
|
Senior Vice President of
Products and Technology
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
236,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,995
|
|
|
|
94,400
|
|
|
|
15,355
|
|
|
|
493,673
|
|
John Federman
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
233,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,262
|
|
|
|
87,125
|
|
|
|
121,373
|
|
|
|
27,264
|
|
|
|
557,998
|
|
Former Senior Vice
President, General Manager,
eStara
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount shown does not reflect compensation actually received
by the named executive officer. Instead, the amount shown
represents the compensation expense recognized in our financial
statements for 2007 in respect of grants of restricted stock
units and stock options to the named executive officer. The
amount shown was computed in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, referred to as
SFAS, No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. See
Notes 1(m) and 5 of the consolidated financial statements
in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 regarding assumptions
underlying the valuation of stock awards. Pursuant to the
applicable SEC rules, the amount shown exclude the impact of
estimated forfeitures related to services-based vesting
conditions. The specific assumptions used in the valuation of
these awards are described below in the following footnotes. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the compensation expense for the vesting of
restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. The fair
value of the restricted stock and restricted stock units is
based on the market value of our common stock price on the date
of grant. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted
stock shares and restricted stock units is being recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The
restricted stock grants provide the holder with shares of our
common stock, which are restricted as to sale until vesting. The
restricted stock units provide the holder with the right to
receive shares of ATG common stock upon vesting. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the compensation expense for the vesting of stock
options. Key assumptions include: risk-free interest rate,
expected life of the option, expected stock price volatility and
expected dividend yield. The specific assumptions used in the
valuation of these stock options are summarized in the table
below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Dividend
|
Grant Date
|
|
Risk Free Rate
|
|
Expected Life
|
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
Yield
|
|
10/10/2006
|
|
4.69%
|
|
6.25 Years
|
|
109%
|
|
0.00%
|
02/28/2006
|
|
4.55%
|
|
6.25 Years
|
|
114%
|
|
0.00%
|
07/18/2005
|
|
3.93%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
93.5%
|
|
0.00%
|
01/27/2005
|
|
3.62%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
93.5%
|
|
0.00%
|
01/25/2005
|
|
3.62%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
93.5%
|
|
0.00%
|
08/30/2004
|
|
3.27%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
97%
|
|
0.00%
|
02/19/2004
|
|
2.59%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
110%
|
|
0.00%
|
01/30/2004
|
|
2.59%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
110%
|
|
0.00%
|
12/02/2003
|
|
3.24%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
110%
|
|
0.00%
|
04/21/2003
|
|
2.57%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
117%
|
|
0.00%
|
03/03/2003
|
|
2.91%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
125%
|
|
0.00%
|
01/02/2003
|
|
2.91%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
125%
|
|
0.00%
|
12/05/2002
|
|
3.01%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
125%
|
|
0.00%
|
08/29/2002
|
|
3.36%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
125%
|
|
0.00%
|
01/08/2002
|
|
4.46%
|
|
4 Years
|
|
125%
|
|
0.00%
|
30
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents payments made under our 2007 Compensation Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
All Other Compensation is comprised of the
Companys 401(k) match, Company-paid health, dental and
other insurance programs, and, with respect to
Mr. Federman, a payment of $13,900 for accrued vacation and
a total payment of $4,944 in restricted cash paid out
incrementally over 11 months as a retention bonus following
our acquisition of eStara, Inc. Perquisites and other personal
benefits, if any, have been excluded because they did not exceed
$10,000. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for 2007
The following table provides information about stock awards and
non-equity incentive awards granted to our named executive
officers during the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Target
|
|
|
All Other Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts Under
|
|
|
Awards: Number
|
|
|
Exercise or Base
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Awards
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Target ($)(1)
|
|
|
Stock Awards (#)
|
|
|
($/Sh)(2)
|
|
|
Awards(3)
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
657,000
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
175,200
|
|
Barry E. Clark
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
219,000
|
|
Clifford J. Conneighton
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
131,400
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
219,000
|
|
John Federman
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
219,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the target payouts for fiscal 2007 for our 2007
Compensation Plan. There are no minimum or maximum payments
under the plan. |
|
(2) |
|
These prices represent our closing stock price on April 12,
2007, the date of grant of restricted stock units under the 1996
Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts calculated utilizing the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment. See Notes 1(m) and 5 of
the consolidated financial statements in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 regarding assumptions
underlying the valuation of equity awards. The fair value of the
restricted stock and restricted stock units is based on the
market value of our common stock price on the date of grant.
Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock
shares and restricted stock units is being recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The
restricted stock grants provide the holder with shares of our
common stock, which are restricted as to sale until vesting. The
restricted stock units provide the holder with the right to
receive shares of our common stock upon vesting. |
31
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Because Mr. Federman forfeited his Restricted Stock Units
when he left the Company on December 7, 2007, expense
previously recognized for this grant was reversed on
Mr. Federmans termination date. |
Some of the restricted stock units in the above table are
performance-based while others are time-based. The time-based
restricted stock units vest 25% annually beginning a year and
thirty days after the date of grant. For restricted stock units
granted on April 12, 2007, the first vesting date will be
May 12, 2008. The performance-based restricted stock units
vest annually at twenty-five percent as long as a fifty percent
threshold of the yearly adjusted operating profit goal is met.
These restricted stock units will vest in full, immediately, if
we reach a revenue goal substantially in excess of our current
guidance. The performance features of the restricted stock unit
awards trigger the requirement that we record compensation
expense on an accelerated basis for these performance-based
restricted stock unit awards. The time-based vesting restricted
stock units do not include this acceleration feature. Each
restricted stock unit will have a base price per share equal to
the fair market value per share of the common stock on the date
of vesting.
Employment
Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements
On April 14, 2008 we further amended and restated the
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Robert D. Burke,
our President and Chief Executive Officer. The amended and
restated agreement amends our prior letter agreement with
Mr. Burke, dated December 4, 2002, amended on
March 28, 2003 and amended and restated on November 8,
2004, and provides for severance benefits in the event his
employment is terminated under specified circumstances. This
agreement provides that if we terminate his employment without
cause or if he resigns for good reason, we will continue to pay
his base salary and all employee benefits for the
12-month
period following his termination in addition to any accrued
obligations, such as any annual cash incentive compensation
earned for our most recently completed fiscal year and not yet
paid, his base salary through the date of termination, any
deferred compensation and any accrued vacation pay. Among other
events that constitute good reason for Mr. Burkes
resignation is a change in control that results in our no longer
having a publicly traded class of securities or our no longer
being subject to reporting requirements under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The change in control provisions in
Mr. Burkes amended and restated agreement provide
that in the event of a change in control if we terminate his
employment without cause or if he resigns for good reason, in
either event within eighteen months of such change in control,
Mr. Burke will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
his pro-rated target bonus in the year in which the termination
occurs,
|
|
|
|
base salary and health benefits for eighteen months, and
|
|
|
|
one and a half times the target bonus paid over the same
eighteen month period based on Mr. Burkes
then-current target bonus.
|
The agreement also provides that upon a change in control, all
of Mr. Burkes outstanding stock options and other
stock awards will vest in full. In addition, upon such change in
control, we will pay Mr. Burke the amount, if any,
necessary to compensate him for any excise taxes that he may owe
under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as
a result of payments we make to him in connection with the
change in control.
32
On July 6, 2005, Julie M.B. Bradley accepted our offer
letter to become our Chief Financial Officer. The offer letter
provided that Ms. Bradley would receive an annual salary of
$230,000 and be eligible for potential annual cash incentive
compensation of $80,000 annually. In 2006,
Ms. Bradleys annual cash incentive compensation plan
was amended so that she would be eligible for potential on
target annual cash incentive compensation of $100,000.
On October 9, 2007, we entered into a letter agreement with
John Federman, our former Senior Vice President, General
Manager, eStara, regarding the terms of his resignation. The
letter modified the terms of our offer letter with
Mr. Federman dated September 15, 2006. The offer
letter provided that Mr. Federman would receive an annual
salary of $250,000, be eligible for potential annual cash
incentive compensation of $100,000 annually and be granted a
stock option to acquire 200,000 shares of our common stock.
The resignation letter provided that Mr. Federman would
receive his base salary and benefits through December 31,
2007 or until his termination, whichever came first, as well as
a pro-rated 2007 bonus against the stated criteria in the 2007
Compensation Plan in exchange for his continued services as a
consultant for eStara until December 31, 2007. Furthermore,
if Mr. Federmans termination occurred before
November 30, 2007, he would receive an additional bonus
equal to the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq
Stock Market on November 30, 2007, multiplied by 3,159.
Mr. Federman left the Company on December 7, 2007 and
his cash incentive compensation is detailed in the Summary
Compensation Table on page 25.
Our General Change in Control Policy was amended by our board of
directors in March 2008. As a result of the amendment, the
policy is only applicable to general employees and a separate
policy has been created for our vice presidents. Each of
Ms. Bradley and our senior vice presidents and other
executives reporting directly to our Chief Executive Officer,
have entered into Change in Control Agreements. The agreements
provide that upon a change in control, 50% of the
executives outstanding stock options and other stock
awards will automatically vest. In addition, upon a change in
control and either our termination of the executive without
cause or termination by the executive due to good reason, within
twelve months of the change in control, the executive will
receive:
|
|
|
|
|
his or her pro-rated target bonus in the year the termination
occurs,
|
|
|
|
base salary and benefits for twelve months,
|
|
|
|
a target bonus for the same twelve month period based on the
Executives current target bonus, and
|
|
|
|
an acceleration of
his/her
remaining unvested stock awards.
|
Had a change in control occurred on December 31, 2007 and
had their employment been terminated by the Company without
cause or by the individual for good reason (as defined in the
Change of Control Agreements) on December 31, 2007, under
the terms of the agreements as amended on April 14, 2008,
the named executive officers would have been eligible to receive
the payments set forth in the table below.
33
Payments
Resulting from a Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary &
|
|
|
Value of Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Equity as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
Benefits ($)
|
|
|
Services ($)
|
|
|
($)(5)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke
|
|
$
|
1,025,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
5,653,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
22,320
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,715,320
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley
|
|
|
430,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,261,250
|
(4)
|
|
|
14,880
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721,130
|
|
Barry E. Clark
|
|
|
620,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,551,900
|
(4)
|
|
|
14,880
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,201,780
|
|
Clifford J. Conneighton
|
|
|
440,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,477,900
|
(4)
|
|
|
14,880
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,947,780
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe
|
|
|
440,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,672,349
|
(4)
|
|
|
14,880
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,142,229
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of (a) eighteen (18) months of
Mr. Burkes annual base salary for 2007, (b) a
pro-rated target bonus for 2007 and (c) a payment of one
and a half times the target bonus for 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of (a) twelve (12) months of the named
executive officers annual base salary for 2007, (b) a
pro-rated target bonus for 2007 and (c) a payment equal to
the target bonus for 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the value of all vested and outstanding long-term
incentive awards (both options and restricted stock units),
based on a stock price of $4.32 (the closing price of the
Companys common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on
December 31, 2007). Pursuant to Mr. Burkes
amended and restated employment agreement, all unvested options
and restricted stock units would accelerate upon the assumed
change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the value of all vested and outstanding long-term
incentive awards (both options and restricted stock units),
based on a stock price of $4.32 (the closing price of the
Companys common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on
December 31, 2007). Pursuant to the named executive
officers change in control agreements, all unvested
options and restricted stock units would accelerate upon an
assumed change in control and termination without cause by ATG
or by the individual for good reason (as defined in the
agreements). |
|
(5) |
|
Upon a change in control, we are required to pay Mr. Burke
the amount, if any, necessary to compensate Mr. Burke for
any excise taxes that he may owe under Section 4999 of the
Internal Revenue Code as a result of payments made to him in
connection with the change in control. Based on our estimates of
the total compensation payable to Mr. Burke in the event a
change of control had occurred on December 31, 2007, no
excise taxes would be owed. |
34
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
of Shares or
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Units of Stock
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option Exercise
|
|
|
|
that have
|
|
that have not
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Option Expiration
|
|
not vested
|
|
vested
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)(4)
|
|
($)(5)
|
|
Robert D. Burke
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
2/28/2016
|
(1)
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,296,000
|
|
|
|
|
179,063
|
|
|
|
85,937
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
1/27/2015
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,937
|
|
|
|
14,063
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1/30/2014
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
1/2/2013
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
12/5/2012
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julie M. B. Bradley
|
|
|
37,187
|
|
|
|
47,813
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
2/28/2016
|
(1)
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
354,600
|
|
|
|
|
140,625
|
|
|
|
109,375
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
7/18/2015
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry E. Clark
|
|
|
39,375
|
|
|
|
50,625
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
2/28/2016
|
(1)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
432,000
|
|
|
|
|
68,749
|
|
|
|
31,251
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
1/25/2015
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,999
|
|
|
|
15,001
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
2/19/2014
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clifford J. Conneighton
|
|
|
39,374
|
|
|
|
50,626
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
2/28/2016
|
(1)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
259,200
|
|
|
|
|
68,750
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
1/25/2015
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1/30/2014
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
12/2/2013
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe
|
|
|
56,875
|
|
|
|
73,125
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
2/28/2016
|
(1)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
432,000
|
|
|
|
|
68,750
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
1/25/2015
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,562
|
|
|
|
23,438
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
8/30/2014
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,875
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1/30/2014
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
11/13/2013
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
4/21/2013
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
1/8/2012
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
8/3/2011
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.31
|
|
|
|
5/2/2011
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
4/9/2011
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78.00
|
|
|
|
10/18/2010
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.03
|
|
|
|
10/1/2009
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
7/19/2009
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Federman
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
3/7/2008
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This stock option vests in sixteen equal quarterly installments
beginning on the three-month anniversary of the date of grant. |
|
(2) |
|
This stock option is fully vested. |
|
(3) |
|
25% of the shares subject to this stock option vest one year
after the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in twelve
equal quarterly installments thereafter. |
|
(4) |
|
These restricted stock units were granted on April 12, 2007
and vest at a rate of 25% per year, commencing on May 12,
2008. |
|
(5) |
|
The value is based on the closing sale price for our common
stock as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market on
December 31, 2007, the last trading day of fiscal year
2007, which was $4.32. |
35
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Federman left the company on December 7, 2007 and
was required to exercise his vested options within ninety days
of that date to avoid forfeiture. |
Stock
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2007
The following table provides information about stock option
exercises by our named executive officers as well as stock award
vesting during the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
on Exercise (#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
on Vesting (#)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry E. Clark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clifford J. Conneighton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe
|
|
|
111,283
|
|
|
$
|
276,879
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Federman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,908
|
|
|
$
|
112,871
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated value realized upon exercise is calculated based
on the difference between the closing market price of our common
stock on the date of exercise, $3.15, and the exercise prices of
the exercised options: |
|
|
|
44,200 shares exercised at $0.25 per share |
|
|
|
10,000 shares exercised at $0.96 per share |
|
|
|
13,333 shares exercised at $0.99 per share |
|
|
|
43,750 shares exercised at $0.91 per share |
|
(2) |
|
The value realized on the vesting of shares of restricted stock
is the number of shares that vested multiplied by the closing
market price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on
the date of vesting. 3,159 of Mr. Federmans
restricted shares vested on the first of each month during 2007. |
Director
Compensation
Our board of directors adopted our Non-Employee Director
Compensation Plan on July 19, 2005, amended the plan on
April 4, 2006 and further amended the plan May 17,
2007. The purpose of the plan is to advance the interests of our
stockholders by enhancing our ability to attract, retain and
motivate our outside directors by providing them with
compensation and equity ownership that is intended to better
align their interests with those of the companys
stockholders. Only non-employee directors are eligible for
awards under this plan. Under the plan, in fiscal 2007 we
compensated our non-employee directors as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
We paid an annual cash retainer of $10,000 to each of our
non-employee directors.
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
To compensate the chairman of the board and committee
chairpersons for the additional work imposed by these roles, we
provided an additional annual retainer of $7,500 to the chairman
of the board and each non-employee committee chairperson.
|
|
|
|
We made additional payments to each non-employee director for
attending meetings of the board of directors and committees of
the board as follows: $1,500 for each in-person meeting of the
board, $1,000 for each in person meeting of a committee of the
board and $500 for each teleconference meeting of the board or a
committee of the board.
|
|
|
|
On the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we
granted restricted stock awards to each of our continuing
non-employee directors under our Amended and Restated 1999
Outside Director Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Director
Plan) for 1,844 shares of our common stock. The
number of shares was determined by dividing $4,500 by the fair
market value of a share of our common stock on May 17,
2007, the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting. These restricted
stock awards vest in their entirety one year after the date of
grant.
|
|
|
|
On May 21, 2007, we granted to each of our non-employee
directors 20,000 restricted stock units, which vest fully on
May 21, 2008, under our 1999 Director Plan. Per the
terms of the grant, these restricted stock units will fully vest
upon a change in control. The number of restricted stock units
was determined after a review of competitive analysis from our
compensation consultant, Towers Perrin and consideration of
other pertinent factors.
|
We stress some of the same areas of importance with director
compensation as with executive compensation, including the
desire to attract top talent and retain that talent with
competitive and fair compensation within our peer group. We also
reimburse directors living outside of the greater Boston area
for travel and living expenses for attending regular board
meetings and committee meetings.
37
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our
non-employee directors during the year ended December 31,
2007.
Non-Employee
Director Compensation Table for Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash ($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Michael A. Brochu
|
|
$
|
25,500
|
|
|
$
|
33,079
|
|
|
$
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,823
|
|
David B. Elsbree
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
33,079
|
|
|
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,323
|
|
John R. Held
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
33,079
|
|
|
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,323
|
|
Ilene H. Lang
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
33,079
|
|
|
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,823
|
|
Mary E. Makela
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
33,079
|
|
|
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,323
|
|
Daniel C. Regis
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
33,079
|
|
|
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,323
|
|
Phyllis S. Swersky
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
33,079
|
|
|
|
24,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,323
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $10,000 annual retainer and fees earned in 2007
resulting from attendance at board or committee meetings. Also
includes an additional annual retainer of $7,500 to each of
Messrs. Regis and Elsbree and Mses. Makela and Swersky for
service as chairperson of the board or a committee of the board. |
|
(2) |
|
The amount shown does not reflect compensation actually received
by the non-employee director. Instead, the amount shown reflects
the compensation expense recognized in our financial statements
for 2007 in respect of the grant of restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units to each non-employee director under the
1999 Director Plan. These amounts were calculated utilizing
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, using a grant date
fair value, as indicated below, based on the fair market value
of our common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to the
applicable SEC rules, the amount shown excludes the impact of
estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. The fair value of the restricted stock and
restricted stock units is based on the market value of our
common stock price on the date of grant. Stock-based
compensation expense related to restricted stock shares and
restricted stock units is being recognized on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period. The restricted stock
grants provide the holder with shares of our stock, which are
restricted as to sale until vesting. The restricted stock units
provide the holder with the right to receive shares of our stock
upon vesting. |
|
(3) |
|
The amount shown does not reflect compensation actually received
by the non-employee director. Instead, the amount shown reflects
the compensation expense recognized in our financial statements
for 2007 in respect of the vesting of stock options issued held
by each non-employee director under the 1999 Director Plan.
These amounts were calculated utilizing the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, using a grant date fair value, as
indicated below, based on the |
38
|
|
|
|
|
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Pursuant to the applicable SEC rules, the amount shown excludes
the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based
vesting conditions. The specific assumptions used in the
valuation of these awards are described below in the following
footnote. Key assumptions include: risk-free interest rate,
expected life of the option, expected stock price volatility and
expected dividend yield. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Risk Free Rate
|
|
Expected Life
|
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
Expected Dividend Yield
|
|
|
05/23/2006
|
|
4.94%
|
|
6.25 years
|
|
115.0%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate number of shares of
our common stock issuable upon the exercise of all stock options
when vested, held by each director named in the table above is
as follows: Mr. Brochu, 917,370; Mr. Elsbree, 75,000;
Mr. Held, 125,000; Ms. Lang, 100,000; Ms. Makela,
125,000; Mr. Regis, 142,835; and Ms. Swersky, 145,000. |
Compensation
Committee Report
The Compensation Committee reviewed the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement
and discussed the section with management. Based on this review
and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee
recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section be included in this proxy
statement.
Compensation Committee
Mary E. Makela, Chair
John R. Held
Phyllis S. Swersky
Michael A. Brochu
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
John R. Held, Mary E. Makela and Phyllis S. Swersky served on
the Compensation Committee during 2007. None of these directors
was, during or before 2007, an officer or employee of our
company or of any of our affiliates. None of our executive
officers serves as a director or member of the compensation
committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of
any other organization that has one or more of its executive
officers serving as a member of our board of directors or
Compensation Committee.
39
INFORMATION
ABOUT STOCK OWNERSHIP
The following table provides information as of March 31,
2008 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common
stock by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by us to own beneficially more than five
percent of our outstanding shares of common stock,
|
|
|
|
each of our directors and executive officers,
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers for 2007, and
|
|
|
|
all current directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Acquire
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
Robert D. Burke
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
1,525,938
|
|
|
|
1,605,938
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Michael A. Brochu
|
|
|
20,537
|
|
|
|
937,370
|
|
|
|
957,907
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kenneth Z. Volpe
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
474,077
|
|
|
|
477,821
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Clifford J. Conneighton
|
|
|
20,685
|
|
|
|
446,874
|
|
|
|
467,559
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Patricia ONeill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,417
|
|
|
|
360,417
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ilene H. Lang(1)
|
|
|
209,245
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
329,245
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Barry E. Clark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,874
|
|
|
|
396,874
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Phyllis S. Swersky
|
|
|
100,295
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
265,295
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John R. Held
|
|
|
98,095
|
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
|
243,095
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David B. Elsbree(2)
|
|
|
119,503
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
214,503
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Daniel C. Regis(3)
|
|
|
28,755
|
|
|
|
162,835
|
|
|
|
191,590
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mary E. Makela
|
|
|
38,095
|
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
|
183,095
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Julie M.B. Bradley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,376
|
|
|
|
239,688
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Louis R. Frio Jr.
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
116,249
|
|
|
|
117,094
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Andrew Reynolds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John Federman(4)
|
|
|
107,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group
(15 persons)
|
|
|
827,118
|
|
|
|
5,330,322
|
|
|
|
6,045,121
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%(5)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes 118,150 shares held directly by
Ms. Langs husband and an additional
45,000 shares held in a profit sharing plan in which
Ms. Langs husband has an indirect and indeterminate
beneficial interest. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 4,000 shares held directly by
Mr. Elsbrees wife. |
40
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes 20,000 shares that are held directly by Regis
Investments, L.P. |
|
(4) |
|
Based solely on information available to us as of
Mr. Federmans termination date, December 7, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Does not include Mr. Federman, who is not currently an
executive officer. |
|
(6) |
|
Shares included in the Outstanding column include
shares of restricted stock awards that have not yet vested. |
|
(7) |
|
Shares included in the Right to Acquire column
consist of shares that may be acquired through the exercise of
options or vesting of restricted stock units as of May 30,
2008. |
|
(8) |
|
The percent ownership for each stockholder on March 31,
2008 is calculated by dividing (a) the total number of
shares beneficially owned by the stockholder by
(b) 128,746,546 shares (the number of shares of our
common stock outstanding on March 31, 2008) plus any shares
acquirable (including stock options exercisable by the
stockholder within 60 days after March 31, 2008, and
multiplying the result by 100. |
41
OTHER
MATTERS
Related
Party Transactions
Our Audit Committee reviews and approves all related party
transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to applicable SEC
rules and discusses with management the business rationale for
any such transactions and whether appropriate disclosures have
been made.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of The Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our
directors and executive officers and holders of 10% or more of
our securities to file reports of holdings and transactions in
our equity securities with the SEC. We are also required to
identify any such holders who fails to timely file with the SEC
any required report relating to ownership or changes in
ownership of our equity securities.
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed with
the SEC and, in some cases, written representations furnished to
us, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements
during 2007 were timely met.
Householding
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be
participating in the practice of householding proxy
statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of
our proxy statement or annual report may have been sent to
multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly
deliver separate copies of our proxy statement and annual report
to you if you call us at
(617) 386-1000
or write us at Art Technology Group, Inc., One Main Street,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, Attention: Secretary. If you
want to receive separate copies of the annual report and proxy
statement in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies
and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you
should contact your bank, broker, or other nominee record
holder, or you may contact us at the above address and phone
number.
42
APPENDIX A
As
amended and restated by the
Board of Directors
on April 17, 2008
ART
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
AMENDED
AND RESTATED 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN
1. Purpose. The purpose of
this Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (the
Plan) of Art Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), is to advance the
interests of the Companys stockholders by enhancing the
Companys ability to attract, retain and motivate persons
who are expected to make important contributions to the Company
and by providing such persons with equity ownership
opportunities and performance-based incentives that are intended
to better align their interests with those of the Companys
stockholders. Except where the context otherwise requires, the
term Company shall include any of the Companys
present or future parent or subsidiary corporations as defined
in Section 424(e) or (f) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, and any regulations promulgated thereunder
(the Code) and any other business venture (including
any joint venture or limited liability company) in which the
Company has a controlling interest, as determined by the Board
of Directors of the Company (the Board).
2. Eligibility. All of the
Companys employees, officers, directors, consultants and
advisors are eligible to receive options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards (each, an
Award) under the Plan. Each person who receives an
Award under the Plan is deemed a Participant.
3. Administration and Delegation.
(a) Administration by Board. The
Plan will be administered by the Board. The Board shall have
authority to grant Awards and to adopt, amend and repeal such
administrative rules, guidelines and practices relating to the
Plan as it shall deem advisable. The Board may correct any
defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in
the Plan or any Award in the manner and to the extent it shall
deem expedient to carry the Plan into effect (including the
interpretation and implementation of Section 11(g)) and it
shall be the sole and final judge of such expediency. All
decisions by the Board shall be made in the Boards sole
discretion and shall be final and binding on all persons having
or claiming any interest in the Plan or in any Award. No
director or person acting pursuant to the authority delegated by
the Board shall be liable for any action or determination
relating to or under the Plan made in good faith.
(b) Appointment of Committees. To
the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board may delegate
any or all of its powers under the Plan to one or more
committees or subcommittees of the Board (a
Committee). All references in the Plan to the
Board shall mean the Board or a Committee of the
Board or the officers referred to in Section 3(c) to the
extent that the Boards powers or authority under the Plan
have been delegated to such Committee or officers.
A-1
(c) Delegation to Officers. To the
extent permitted by applicable law, the Board may delegate to
one or more officers of the Company the power to grant Awards to
employees or officers of the Company or any of its present or
future subsidiary corporations and to exercise such other powers
under the Plan as the Board may determine, provided that the
Board shall fix the terms of the Awards to be granted by such
officers (including the exercise price of such Awards, which may
include a formula by which the exercise price will be
determined) and the maximum number of shares subject to Awards
that the officers may grant; provided further that no officer
shall be authorized to grant Awards to any executive
officer of the Company (as defined by
Rule 3b-7
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) or to any officer of the
Company (as defined by
Rule 16a-1
under the Exchange Act).
4. Stock Available for Awards.
(a) Number of Shares. Subject to
adjustment under Section 9, Awards may be made under the
Plan for up to 32,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.01 par value per share, of the Company (the Common
Stock). If any Award expires or is terminated, surrendered
or canceled without having been fully exercised or is forfeited
in whole or in part (including as the result of shares of Common
Stock subject to such Award being repurchased by the Company at
the original issuance price pursuant to a contractual repurchase
right) or results in any Common Stock not being issued, the
unused Common Stock covered by such Award shall again be
available for the grant of Awards under the Plan, subject,
however, in the case of Incentive Stock Options (as hereinafter
defined), to any limitations under the Code. Shares issued under
the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but
unissued shares or treasury shares. Solely for the purpose of
applying this limitation (and not for purposes of
Section 4(b) below), each Option (each as hereinafter
defined) granted under this Plan shall reduce the number of
shares available for grant by one share for every one share
granted, each SAR (each as hereinafter defined) granted under
this Plan shall reduce the number of shares available for grant
by one share for every one share underlying the SAR, and each
Award authorized under this Plan after April 5, 2007, other
than an Option or SAR, shall reduce the number of shares
available by 1.24 shares for every one share granted.
Shares that are (i) subject to a stock-settled SAR Award
that were not issued upon the net settlement or net exercise of
such SAR Award and (ii) shares delivered to or withheld by
the Company to pay the withholding taxes related to an Option or
a SAR Award, may not again be made available for issuance under
the Plan.
(b) Section 162(m) Per-Participant
Limit. Subject to adjustment under
Section 9, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock
with respect to which Awards may be granted to any Participant
under the Plan shall be 1,000,000 per calendar year. For
purposes of the foregoing limit, the combination of an Option in
tandem with an SAR shall be treated as a single Award. The
per-Participant limit described in this Section 4(b) shall
be construed and applied consistently with Section 162(m)
of the Code or any successor provision thereto, and the
regulations thereunder (Section 162(m)).
A-2
5. Stock Options.
(a) General. The Board may grant
options to purchase Common Stock (each, an Option)
and determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered
by each Option, the exercise price of each Option and the
conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of each
Option, including conditions relating to applicable federal or
state securities laws, as it considers necessary or advisable.
An Option that is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option
(as hereinafter defined) shall be designated a
Nonstatutory Stock Option.
(b) Incentive Stock Options. An
Option that the Board intends to be an incentive stock
option as defined in Section 422 of the Code (an
Incentive Stock Option) shall only be granted to
employees of Art Technology Group, Inc., any of Art Technology
Group, Inc.s present or future parent or subsidiary
corporations as defined in Section 424(e) or (f) of
the Code, and any other entities the employees of which are
eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options under the Code, and
shall be subject to and shall be construed consistently with the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code. The Company shall
have no liability to a Participant, or any other party, if an
Option (or any part thereof) that is intended to be an Incentive
Stock Option is not an Incentive Stock Option or for any action
taken by the Board pursuant to Section 10(f), including the
conversion of an Incentive Stock Option to a Nonstatutory Stock
Option.
(c) Exercise Price. The Board
shall establish the exercise price of each Option and specify
such exercise price in the applicable option agreement,
provided, however, that the exercise price of any Option shall
not be less than the fair market value per share of the Common
Stock as of the date of option grant.
(d) Duration of Options. Each
Option shall be exercisable at such times and subject to such
terms and conditions as the Board may specify in the applicable
option agreement, provided, however, that no Option shall be
exercisable more than ten (10) years after the date the
Option is granted.
(e) Exercise of Options. Options
may be exercised by delivery to the Company of a written notice
of exercise signed by the proper person or by any other form of
notice (including electronic notice) approved by the Board
together with payment in full as specified in Section 5(f)
for the number of shares for which the Option is exercised.
(f) Payment Upon Exercise. Common
Stock purchased upon the exercise of an Option granted under the
Plan shall be paid for as follows:
(1) in cash or by check, payable to the order of the
Company;
(2) except as the Board may otherwise provide in an option
agreement, by (A) delivery of an irrevocable and
unconditional undertaking by a creditworthy broker to deliver
promptly to the Company sufficient funds to pay the exercise
price and any required tax withholding or (B) delivery by
the Participant to the Company of a copy of irrevocable and
unconditional instructions to a creditworthy broker to deliver
promptly to the Company cash or a check sufficient to pay the
exercise price and any required tax withholding or (C) with
the consent of the Board, by reducing the number of shares of
Common Stock otherwise issuable to the
A-3
optionee upon exercise of the Option by a number of shares of
Common Stock having a fair market value equal to such aggregate
exercise price;
(3) when the Common Stock is registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act),
by delivery of shares of Common Stock owned by the Participant
valued at their fair market value as determined by (or in a
manner approved by) the Board (Fair Market Value),
provided (A) such method of payment is then permitted under
applicable law, (B) such Common Stock, if acquired directly from
the Company, was owned by the Participant at least six months
prior to such delivery and (C) such Common Stock is not
subject to any repurchase, forfeiture, unfulfilled vesting or
other similar requirements;
(4) to the extent permitted by applicable law and by the
Board, by (A) delivery of a promissory note of the
Participant to the Company on terms determined by the Board,
with the understanding that no loans shall be made to directors
or executive officers, or (B) payment of such other lawful
consideration as the Board may determine; or
(5) by any combination of the above permitted forms of
payment.
(g) Substitute Options. In
connection with a merger or consolidation of an entity with the
Company or the acquisition by the Company of property or stock
of an entity, the Board may grant Options in substitution for
any options or other stock or stock-based awards granted by such
entity or an affiliate thereof. Substitute Options may be
granted on such terms as the Board deems appropriate in the
circumstances, notwithstanding any limitations on Options
contained in the other sections of this Section 5 or in
Section 2.
(h) No Repricing of
Options. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in the Plan, the Company shall not engage in any
repricing of Options or SARs granted under this Plan without
further stockholder approval. For this purpose, the term
repricing shall mean any of the following or other
action that has the same effect: (i) lowering the exercise
price of an Option or an SAR after it is granted, (ii) any
other actions that is treated as a repricing under generally
accepted accounting principles, or (iii) canceling an
Option or an SAR at a time when its exercise price exceeds the
fair market value of the underlying stock in exchange for
another Option, SAR, restricted stock, or other equity of the
Company, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in
connection with a merger, acquisition, spin-off, or similar
corporate transaction (including any adjustment described in
Section 9).
6. Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a) Nature. A Stock Appreciation
Right (SAR) is an Award entitling the holder on
exercise to receive an amount in cash or Common Stock or a
combination thereof (such form to be determined by the Board)
determined in whole or in part by reference to appreciation,
from and after the date of grant, in the fair market value of a
share of Common Stock, provided, however, that the exercise
price of any SAR shall not be less than the fair market value
per share of the Common Stock as of the date of the SAR Award.
The date as of which such appreciation or other measure is
determined shall be the exercise date unless another date is
specified by the Board in the SAR Award.
A-4
(b) Grants. SARs may be granted in
tandem with, or independently of, Options granted under the Plan.
(1) Tandem Awards. When SARs are
expressly granted in tandem with Options: (A) the SAR will
be exercisable only at such time or times, and to the extent,
that the related Option is exercisable and will be exercisable
in accordance with the procedure required for exercise of the
related Option; (B) the SAR will terminate and no longer be
exercisable upon the termination or exercise of the related
Option, except that a SAR granted with respect to less than the
full number of shares covered by an Option will not be reduced
until the number of shares as to which the related Option has
been exercised or has terminated exceeds the number of shares
not covered by the SAR; (C) the Option will terminate and
no longer be exercisable upon the exercise of the related SAR;
and (D) the SAR will be transferable only with the related
Option.
(2) Independent SARs. A SAR not
expressly granted in tandem with an Option will become
exercisable at such time or times, and on such conditions, as
the Board may specify in the SAR Award.
(c) Exercise. A SAR may be
exercised only by delivery to the Company of a written notice of
exercise signed by the proper person or other form of notice
(including electronic notice) approved by the Board, together
with any other documents required by the Board.
(d) Duration of SARs. No SAR shall
be exercisable more than ten (10) years after the date the
SAR is granted.
7. Restricted Stock.
(a) Grants. The Board may grant
Awards entitling recipients to acquire shares of Common Stock,
subject to the right of the Company to repurchase all or part of
such shares at their issue price or other stated or formula
price (or to require forfeiture of such shares if issued at no
cost) from the recipient in the event that conditions specified
by the Board in the applicable Award are not satisfied prior to
the end of the applicable restriction period or periods
established by the Board for such Award (each, a
Restricted Stock Award).
(b) Terms and Conditions. The
Board shall determine the terms and conditions of a Restricted
Stock Award, including the conditions for repurchase (or
forfeiture) and the issue price, if any.
(c) Stock Certificates. Any stock
certificates issued in respect of a Restricted Stock Award shall
be registered in the name of the Participant and, unless
otherwise determined by the Board, deposited by the Participant,
together with a stock power endorsed in blank, with the Company
(or its designee). At the expiration of the applicable
restriction periods, the Company (or such designee) shall
deliver the certificates no longer subject to such restrictions
to the Participant or the Designated Beneficiary of such
Participant. For these purposes, a Designated
Beneficiary of a Participant shall be (1) a
beneficiary designated by such Participant, in a manner
determined by the Board, to receive amounts due or exercise
rights of such Participant in the event of such
Participants death or (2) in the absence of such a
designation, the Participants estate.
A-5
(d) Deferred Delivery of
Shares. The Board may, at the time any
Restricted Stock Award is granted, provide that, at the time
Common Stock would otherwise be delivered pursuant to the Award,
the Participant shall instead receive an instrument evidencing
the right to future delivery of Common Stock at such time or
times, and on such conditions, as the Board shall specify. The
Board may at any time accelerate the time at which delivery of
all or any part of the Common Stock shall take place.
8. Other Stock-Based
Awards. Other Awards of shares of Common
Stock, and other Awards that are valued in whole or in part by
reference to, or are otherwise based on, shares of Common Stock
or other property, may be granted under the Plan to Participants
(Other Stock Unit Awards), including Awards
entitling recipients to receive shares of Common Stock to be
delivered in the future. Such Other Stock Unit Awards shall also
be available as a form of payment in the settlement of other
Awards granted under the Plan or as payment in lieu of
compensation to which a Participant is otherwise entitled. Other
Stock Unit Awards may be paid in shares of Common Stock or cash,
as the Board shall determine. Subject to the provisions of the
Plan, the Board shall determine the conditions of each Other
Stock Unit Awards, including any purchase price applicable
thereto. At the time any Award is granted, the Board may provide
that, at the time Common Stock would otherwise be delivered
pursuant to the Award, the Participant will instead receive an
instrument evidencing the Participants right to future
delivery of the Common Stock.
9. Adjustments for Changes in Common Stock and
Certain Other Events.
(a) Changes in Capitalization. In
the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock
dividend, recapitalization, combination of shares,
reclassification of shares, spin-off or other similar change in
capitalization or event, or any distribution to holders of
Common Stock other than an ordinary cash dividend, (1) the
number and class of securities available under the Plan,
(2) the sub-limit set forth in Section 4(b),
(3) the number and class of securities and exercise price
per share of each outstanding Option, (4) the repurchase
price per share subject to each outstanding Restricted Stock
Award and (5) the share- and per-share-related provisions
of each outstanding SAR and Other Stock Unit Award, shall be
appropriately adjusted by the Company (or substituted Awards may
be made, if applicable) to the extent determined by the Board.
(b) Reorganization Events.
(1) Definition. A
Reorganization Event shall mean: (A) any merger
or consolidation of the Company with or into another entity as a
result of which all of the Common Stock of the Company is
converted into or exchanged for the right to receive cash,
securities or other property, (B) any exchange of all of
the Common Stock of the Company for cash, securities or other
property pursuant to a share exchange transaction or
(C) any liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
(2) Consequences of a Reorganization Event on Awards
Other than Restricted Stock Awards. In
connection with a Reorganization Event, the Board shall have the
authority to
A-6
take, in its discretion, any of the following actions as to all
or any outstanding Awards on such terms as the Board determines:
(A) provide that Awards shall be assumed, or substantially
equivalent Awards shall be substituted, by the acquiring or
succeeding corporation (or an affiliate thereof);
(B) upon written notice to a Participant, provide that the
Participants unexercised Options or other unexercised
Awards shall become exercisable in full and will terminate
immediately prior to the consummation of such Reorganization
Event unless exercised by the Participant within a specified
period following the date of such notice;
(C) provide that outstanding Awards shall become realizable
or deliverable, or restrictions applicable to an Award shall
lapse, in whole or in part prior to or upon such Reorganization
Event;
(D) in the event of a Reorganization Event under the terms
of which holders of Common Stock will receive upon consummation
thereof a cash payment for each share surrendered in the
Reorganization Event (the Acquisition Price), make
or provide for a cash payment to a Participant equal to
(i) the Acquisition Price times the number of shares of
Common Stock subject to the Participants Options or other
Awards (to the extent the exercise price does not exceed the
Acquisition Price) minus (ii) the aggregate exercise price
of all such outstanding Options or other Awards, in exchange for
the termination of such Options or other Awards;
(E) provide that, in connection with a liquidation or
dissolution of the Company, Awards shall convert into the right
to receive liquidation proceeds (if applicable, net of the
exercise price thereof); and
(F) any combination of the foregoing.
For purposes of clause (A) above, an Option shall be
considered assumed if, following consummation of the
Reorganization Event, the Option confers the right to purchase,
for each share of Common Stock subject to the Option immediately
prior to the consummation of the Reorganization Event, the
consideration (whether cash, securities or other property)
received as a result of the Reorganization Event by holders of
Common Stock for each share of Common Stock held immediately
prior to the consummation of the Reorganization Event (and if
holders were offered a choice of consideration, the type of
consideration chosen by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock); provided that if the
consideration received as a result of the Reorganization Event
is not solely common stock of the acquiring or succeeding
corporation (or an affiliate thereof), the Company may, with the
consent of the acquiring or succeeding corporation, provide for
the consideration to be received upon the exercise of Options to
consist solely of common stock of the acquiring or succeeding
corporation (or an affiliate thereof) equivalent in fair market
value to the per share consideration received by holders of
outstanding shares of Common Stock as a result of the
Reorganization Event.
A-7
To the extent all or any portion of an Option becomes
exercisable solely as a result of clause (B) above, the
Board may provide that upon exercise of such Option the
Participant shall receive shares subject to a right of
repurchase by the Company or its successor at the Option
exercise price; such repurchase right (i) shall lapse at
the same rate as the Option would have become exercisable under
its terms and (ii) shall not apply to any shares subject to
the Option that were exercisable under its terms without regard
to clause (B) above.
(3) Consequences of a Reorganization Event on Restricted
Stock Awards. Upon the occurrence of a Reorganization
Event other than a liquidation or dissolution of the Company,
the repurchase and other rights of the Company under each
outstanding Restricted Stock Award shall inure to the benefit of
the Companys successor and shall apply to the cash,
securities or other property that the Common Stock was converted
into or exchanged for pursuant to such Reorganization Event in
the same manner and to the same extent as they applied to the
Common Stock subject to such Restricted Stock Award. Upon the
occurrence of a Reorganization Event involving the liquidation
or dissolution of the Company, except to the extent specifically
provided to the contrary in the instrument evidencing any
Restricted Stock Award or any other agreement between a
Participant and the Company, all restrictions and conditions on
all Restricted Stock Awards then outstanding shall automatically
be deemed terminated or satisfied.
10. General Provisions Applicable to
Awards.
(a) Transferability of
Awards. Awards shall not be sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered by the person to
whom they are granted, either voluntarily or by operation of
law, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or,
other than in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, pursuant to
a qualified domestic relations order, and, during the life of
the Participant, shall be exercisable only by the Participant.
References to a Participant, to the extent relevant in the
context, shall include references to authorized transferees.
(b) Documentation. Each Award
shall be evidenced in such form (written, electronic or
otherwise) as the Board shall determine. Each Award may contain
terms and conditions in addition to those set forth in the Plan.
(c) Board Discretion. Except as
otherwise provided by the Plan, each Award may be made alone or
in addition or in relation to any other Award. The terms of each
Award need not be identical, and the Board need not treat
Participants uniformly.
(d) Termination of Status. The
Board shall determine the effect on an Award of the disability,
death, retirement, authorized leave of absence or other change
in the employment or other status of a Participant and the
extent to which, and the period during which, the Participant,
or the Participants legal representative, conservator,
guardian or Designated Beneficiary, may exercise rights under
the Award.
(e) Withholding. Each Participant
shall pay to the Company, or make provision satisfactory to the
Company for payment of, any taxes required by law to be withheld
in connection with an Award to such Participant. Except as the
Board may otherwise provide in an Award, for so long as
A-8
the Common Stock is registered under the Exchange Act,
Participants may satisfy such tax obligations in whole or in
part by delivery of shares of Common Stock, including shares
retained from the Award creating the tax obligation, valued at
their Fair Market Value; provided that the total tax withholding
where stock is being used to satisfy such tax obligations cannot
exceed the Companys minimum statutory withholding
obligations (based on minimum statutory withholding rates for
federal and state tax purposes, including payroll taxes, that
are applicable to such supplemental taxable income). Shares
surrendered to satisfy tax withholding requirements cannot be
subject to any repurchase, forfeiture, unfulfilled vesting or
other similar requirements. The Company may, to the extent
permitted by law, deduct any such tax obligations from any
payment of any kind otherwise due to a Participant.
(f) Amendment of Award. The Board
may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding Award, including
changing the date of exercise or realization, and converting an
Incentive Stock Option to a Nonstatutory Stock Option, provided
that the Participants consent to such action shall be
required unless the Board determines that the action, taking
into account any related action, would not materially and
adversely affect the Participant.
(g) Conditions on Delivery of
Stock. The Company will not be obligated to
deliver any shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan or to
remove restrictions from shares previously delivered under the
Plan until (1) all conditions of the Award have been met or
removed to the satisfaction of the Company, (2) in the
opinion of the Companys counsel, all other legal matters
in connection with the issuance and delivery of such shares have
been satisfied, including any applicable securities laws and any
applicable stock exchange or stock market rules and regulations,
and (3) the Participant has executed and delivered to the
Company such representations or agreements as the Company may
consider appropriate to satisfy the requirements of any
applicable laws, rules or regulations.
(h) Acceleration. The Board may at
any time provide that any Award shall become immediately
exercisable in full or in part, free of some or all restrictions
or conditions, or otherwise realizable in full or in part, as
the case may be.
(i) Performance Conditions.
(1) This Section 10(i) shall be administered by a
Committee approved by the Board, all of the members of which are
outside directors as defined by Section 162(m)
(the Section 162(m) Committee).
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, if the
Section 162(m) Committee determines at the time a
Restricted Stock Award or Other Stock Unit Award is granted to a
Participant who is then an officer, that such Participant is, or
is likely to be as of the end of the tax year in which the
Company would claim a tax deduction in connection with such
Award, a Covered Employee (as defined in Section 162(m)),
then the Section 162(m) Committee may provide that this
Section 10(i) is applicable to such Award.
(3) If a Restricted Stock Award or Other Stock Unit Award
is subject to this Section 10(i), than the lapsing of
restrictions thereon and the distribution of cash or Shares
A-9
pursuant thereto, as applicable, shall be subject to the
achievement of one or more objective performance goals
established by the Section 162(m) Committee, which:
(A) shall be set by the Section 162(m) Committee
within the time period prescribed by, and shall otherwise comply
with the requirements of, Section 162(m);
(B) shall be based on the attainment of specified levels of
one or any combination of the following: (i) earnings per
share; (ii) return on average equity or average assets with
respect to a pre-determined peer group; (iii) earnings;
(iv) earnings growth; (v) revenues;
(vi) expenses; (vii) stock price; (viii) market
share; (ix) return on sales, assets, equity or investment;
(x) regulatory compliance; (xi) improvement of
financial ratings; (xii) achievement of balance sheet or
income statement objectives; (xiii) total shareholder
return; (xiv) net operating profit after tax; (xv)pre-tax
or after-tax income; (xvi) cash flow; or (xvii) such
other objective goals as are established by the Board;
(C) may be absolute in their terms or measured against or
in relationship to other companies comparably, similarly or
otherwise situated;
(D) may be adjusted to exclude any one or more of
(i) extraordinary items, (ii) gains or losses on the
dispositions of discontinued operations, (iii) the
cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles,
(iv) the writedown of any asset and (v) charges for
restructuring and rationalization programs; and
(E) may vary by Participant and may be different for
different Awards.
(4) Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, with respect
to any Restricted Stock Award or Other Stock Unit Award that is
subject to this Section 10(i), the Section 162(m)
Committee:
(A) may adjust downwards, but not upwards, the cash or
number of Shares payable pursuant to such Award; and
(B) may not waive the achievement of the applicable
performance goals except in the case of the death or disability
of the Participant.
(5) The Section 162(m) Committee shall have the power
to impose such other restrictions on Awards subject to this
Section 10(i) as it may deem necessary or appropriate to
ensure that such Awards satisfy all requirements for
performance-based compensation within the meaning of
Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, or any successor
provision thereto.
11. Miscellaneous.
(a) No Right To Employment or Other
Status. No person shall have any claim or
right to be granted an Award, and the grant of an Award shall
not be construed as giving a Participant the right to continued
employment or any other relationship with the Company. The
Company expressly reserves the right at any time to dismiss or
otherwise terminate its relationship with a Participant free
from any liability or claim under the Plan, except as expressly
provided in the applicable Award.
A-10
(b) No Rights As
Stockholder. Subject to the provisions of the
applicable Award, no Participant or Designated Beneficiary shall
have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares of
Common Stock to be distributed with respect to an Award until
becoming the record holder of such shares. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in the event the Company effects a split of the
Common Stock by means of a stock dividend and the exercise price
of and the number of shares subject to such Option are adjusted
as of the date of the distribution of the dividend (rather than
as of the record date for such dividend), then an optionee who
exercises an Option between the record date and the distribution
date for such stock dividend shall be entitled to receive, on
the distribution date, the stock dividend with respect to the
shares of Common Stock acquired upon such Option exercise,
notwithstanding the fact that such shares were not outstanding
as of the close of business on the record date for such stock
dividend.
(c) Effective Date and Term of
Plan. The Plan shall become effective on the
date on which it is adopted by the Board, but no Award may be
granted unless and until the Plan has been approved by the
Companys stockholders. No Awards shall be granted under
the Plan after December 31, 2013, but Awards previously
granted may extend beyond that date.
(d) Amendment of Plan. The Board
may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof
at any time, provided that, to the extent determined by the
Board, no amendment requiring stockholder approval under any
applicable legal, regulatory or listing requirement shall become
effective until such stockholder approval is obtained. No Award
shall be made that is conditioned upon stockholder approval of
any amendment to the Plan.
(e) Provisions for Foreign
Participants. The Board may modify Awards or
Options granted to Participants who are foreign nationals or
employed outside the United States or establish subplans or
procedures under the Plan to recognize differences in laws,
rules, regulations or customs of such foreign jurisdictions with
respect to tax, securities, currency, employee benefit or other
matters.
(f) Governing Law. The provisions
of the Plan and all Awards made hereunder shall be governed by
and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware, without regard to any applicable conflicts of law.
(g) Effect of Amendment. All
Awards to Participants outstanding as of the date of any
amendment of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect
without modification by such amendment; provided that each
reference in any such Awards to a section of the Plan as in
effect prior to any amendment shall be deemed to refer to the
corresponding section of the Plan as amended unless the
reference to such corresponding section would have an adverse
impact on the Participant holding the applicable Award.
(h) Construction. The headings of
the Sections of the Plan are included only for convenience and
shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of the Plan.
Except as otherwise expressly provided, references herein to
Sections shall mean such Sections of the Plan.
The word including as used in the Plan shall not be
construed so as to exclude any other thing not referred to or
described.
A-11
. NNNNNNNNNNNN Art Technology Group, Inc. NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN C123456789 000004 000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY)
000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext ADD 1 Electronic Voting Instructions ADD 2 ADD 3 You
can vote by Internet or telephone! ADD 4 Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! ADD 5 Instead
of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting ADD 6 methods outlined below to vote
your proxy. NNNNNNNNN VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by
the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 22, 2008. Vote by
Internet Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com/ARTG Follow the steps
outlined on the secured website. Vote by telephone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within
the United States, Canada & Puerto Rico any time on a touch tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to
you for the call. Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in X Follow the
instructions provided by the recorded message. this example. Please do not write outside the
designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card 123456 C0123456789 12345 3 IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED
VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. 3 A Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the
nominees listed, FOR Proposal 2 and FOR Proposal 3. 1. Election of Class II Directors: For
Withhold For Withhold For Withhold + 01 Michael A. Brochu 02 Robert D. Burke 03 Mary E.
Makela For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. To approve the further amendment and
restatement of the 3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Amended and Restated
1996 Stock Option Plan. Public Accounting Firm. B Non-Voting Items Change of Address Please
print new address below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting. C Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be
counted. Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as your name is printed on this proxy. When
signing as attorney-in-fact, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or custodian, or in any
other representative capacity, please write title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below.
Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please keep signature within
the box. C 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A
SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND NNNNNNN3 2 C V 0 1 7 4
6 4 1 MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + |
3 IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND
RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. 3 Proxy Art Technology Group, Inc. The
Board of Directors Of Art Technology Group, Inc. Is Soliciting This Proxy The undersigned owns
shares of common stock of Art Technology Group, Inc. (the Company). The Companys 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Thursday, May 22, 2008, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local
time, at the offices of Foley Hoag LLP, Seaport World Trade Center West, 155 Seaport Boulevard,
Boston, Massachusetts 02210. The undersigned appoints each of Robert D. Burke and Julie M.B.
Bradley acting singly, with the power of substitution to each, as attorney, agent and proxy to vote
all shares of common stock that the undersigned is entitled to vote, at the meeting and at any
adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The individuals named above will vote these shares as
directed by the undersigned on this proxy. IF NO PROPER VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN, THE
INDIVIDUALS NAMED ABOVE WILL VOTE THE SHARES OF THE UNDERSIGNED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES
LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY AS DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY. If any other matters are
properly presented for consideration at the meeting, the individuals named above will have the
discretion to vote these shares on those matters. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.) |