e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 |
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission File
Number: 001-16295
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
75-2759650 |
State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
777 Main Street, Suite 1400, Fort Worth, Texas |
|
76102 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(817) 877-9955
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is
not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2).
Yes o No þ
|
|
|
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity of the Registrant was last sold as of
June 30, 2006 (the last business day of
Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter) |
|
$1,324,038,526 |
Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding as of February 20, 2007 |
|
53,113,534 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts
of the definitive proxy statement for the Registrants 2007
annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this report on
Form 10-K.
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
INDEX
i
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
GLOSSARY OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS TERMS
The following are abbreviations and definitions of certain terms
commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry and this
annual report on
Form 10-K (the
Report):
|
|
|
|
|
Bbl. One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons
liquid volume, used in reference to oil or other liquid
hydrocarbons. |
|
|
|
Bcf. One billion cubic feet of natural gas. |
|
|
|
Bbl/ D. One Bbl per day. |
|
|
|
BOE. One barrel of oil equivalent, calculated by
converting natural gas to oil equivalent barrels at a ratio of
six Mcf to one Bbl of oil. |
|
|
|
BOE/ D. One BOE per day. |
|
|
|
Completion. The installation of permanent equipment for
the production of oil or natural gas. |
|
|
|
Delay Rentals. Fees paid to the lessor of the oil and
natural gas lease during the primary term of the lease prior to
the commencement of production from a well. |
|
|
|
Developed Acreage. The number of acres which are
allocated or assignable to producing wells or wells capable of
production. |
|
|
|
Development Well. A well drilled within the proved area
of an oil or natural gas reservoir to the depth of a
stratigraphic horizon known to be productive. |
|
|
|
Drill-to-Earn. The acquisition of an ownership interest
in the reserves and production found and developed on properties
in which no ownership interest exists prior to the onset of
drilling. |
|
|
|
Encore or the Company. Encore Acquisition Company, a
Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
Exploratory Well. A well drilled to find and produce oil
or natural gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir in a
field previously found to be productive of oil or natural gas in
another reservoir, or to extend a known reservoir. |
|
|
|
Farm-out. Transfer of all or part of the operating rights
from the working interest owner to an assignee, who assumes all
or some of the burden of development, in return for an interest
in the property. |
|
|
|
Gross Acres or Gross Wells. The total acres or wells, as
the case may be, in which we have a working interest. |
|
|
|
High-Pressure Air Injection (HPAI). HPAI
involves utilizing compressors to inject air into previously
produced oil and natural gas formations in order to displace
remaining resident hydrocarbons and force them under pressure to
a common lifting point for production. |
|
|
|
Horizontal Drilling. A drilling operation in which a
portion of the well is drilled horizontally within a productive
or potentially productive formation. This operation usually
yields a well which has the ability to produce higher volumes
than a vertical well drilled in the same formation. |
|
|
|
Lease Operations Expense (LOE). All direct
and allocated indirect costs of producing oil and natural gas
after completion of drilling and before removal of production
from the property. Such costs include labor, superintendence,
supplies, repairs, maintenance, and direct overhead charges. |
|
|
|
LIBOR. London Interbank Offered Rate. |
|
|
|
MBbl. One thousand Bbls. |
|
|
|
MBOE. One thousand BOE. |
ii
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
MBOE/ D. One thousand BOE per day. |
|
|
|
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet of natural gas. |
|
|
|
Mcf/ D. One Mcf per day. |
|
|
|
Mcfe. One Mcf equivalent, calculated by converting oil to
natural gas equivalent at a ratio of one Bbl of oil to six Mcf. |
|
|
|
Mcfe/ D. One Mcfe per day. |
|
|
|
MMBbl. One million Bbls. |
|
|
|
MMBOE. One million BOE. |
|
|
|
MMBtu. One million British thermal units. One British
thermal unit is the amount of heat required to raise the
temperature of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit. |
|
|
|
MMcf. One million Mcf. |
|
|
|
MMcf/ D. One MMcf per day. |
|
|
|
Net Acres or Net Wells. Gross acres or wells, as the case
may be, multiplied by the percentage working interest owned by
us. |
|
|
|
Net Production. Production that is owned by us less
royalties and production due others. |
|
|
|
NYMEX. New York Mercantile Exchange. |
|
|
|
Oil. Crude oil or condensate. |
|
|
|
Operating Income. Gross oil and natural gas revenue less
applicable production, ad valorem, and severance taxes and LOE. |
|
|
|
Operator. The individual or company responsible for the
exploration, exploitation, and production of an oil or natural
gas well or lease. |
|
|
|
Present Value of Future Net Revenues or Present Value or
PV-10. The pretax
present value of estimated future revenues to be generated from
the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production
and future development costs, using prices and costs as of the
date of estimation without future escalation, without giving
effect to hedging activities, non-property related expenses such
as general and administrative expenses, debt service and
depletion, depreciation, and amortization, and discounted using
an annual discount rate of 10 percent. |
|
|
|
Productive Well. A well that produces commercial
quantities of hydrocarbons, exclusive of its capacity to produce
at a reasonable rate of return. |
|
|
|
Proved Developed Reserves. Reserves that can be expected
to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment
and operating methods. |
|
|
|
Proved Reserves. The estimated quantities of oil, natural
gas, and natural gas liquids that geological and engineering
data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are recoverable in
future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions. |
|
|
|
Proved Undeveloped Reserves. Proved undeveloped reserves
are proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new
wells drilled to known reservoirs on acreage yet to be drilled
for which the existence and recoverability of such reserves can
be estimated with reasonable certainty, or from existing wells
where a relatively major expenditure is required to establish
production. Proved undeveloped reserves include unrealized
production response from fluid injection and other improved
recovery techniques, such as high-pressure air injection, where
such techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in
the area and in the same reservoir. |
iii
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve-To-Production Index (R/ P Index). An
estimate expressed in years of the total estimated proved
reserves attributable to a producing property divided by
production from the property for the 12 months preceding
the date as of which the proved reserves were estimated. |
|
|
|
Royalty. An interest in an oil and natural gas lease that
gives the owner of the interest the right to receive a portion
of the production from the leased acreage (or of the proceeds of
the sale thereof), but does not require the owner to pay any
portion of the costs of drilling or operating the wells on the
leased acreage. Royalties may be either landowners
royalties, which are reserved by the owner of the leased acreage
at the time the lease is granted, or overriding royalties, which
are usually reserved by an owner of the leasehold in connection
with a transfer to a subsequent owner. |
|
|
|
SEC. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
Standardized Measure. Future cash inflows from proved oil
and natural gas reserves, less future development and production
costs and future income tax expenses, discounted at
10 percent per annum to reflect the timing of future cash
flows. Standardized Measure differs from
PV-10 because
Standardized Measure includes the effect of future income taxes. |
|
|
|
Tertiary Recovery. An enhanced recovery operation that
normally occurs after waterflooding in which chemicals or
natural gasses are used as the injectant. HPAI is a form of
tertiary recovery. |
|
|
|
Unit. A specifically defined area within which acreage is
treated as a single consolidated lease for operations and for
allocations of costs and benefits without regard to ownership of
the acreage. Units are established for the purpose of recovering
oil and natural gas from specified zones or formations. |
|
|
|
Waterflood. A secondary recovery operation in which water
is injected into the producing formation in order to maintain
reservoir pressure and force oil toward and into the producing
wells. |
|
|
|
Working Interest. An interest in an oil and natural gas
lease that gives the owner of the interest the right to drill
for and produce oil and natural gas on the leased acreage and
requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and
production operations. |
iv
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
This Report contains forward-looking statements, which give our
current expectations and forecasts of future events. The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe
harbor for forward-looking statements made by us or on our
behalf. Please read Item 1A. Risk Factors for a
description of various factors that could materially affect our
ability to achieve the anticipated results described in the
forward-looking statements. Certain terms commonly used in the
oil and natural gas industry and in this Report are defined
above under the caption Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas
Terms. In addition, all production and reserve volumes
disclosed in this Report represent amounts net to us.
PART I
|
|
ITEMS 1 and 2. |
BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES |
General
Our Business. Our primary focus is the acquisition and
development of oil and natural gas reserves from onshore fields
in the United States. Since 1998, we have acquired producing
properties with proven reserves and leasehold acreage and grown
the production and proven reserves by drilling, exploring,
reengineering or expanding existing waterflood projects, and
applying tertiary recovery techniques. Our
properties and our oil and natural gas
reserves are located in four core areas:
|
|
|
|
|
the Cedar Creek Anticline (CCA) in the Williston
Basin of Montana and North Dakota; |
|
|
|
the Permian Basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico; |
|
|
|
the Rockies, which includes non-CCA assets in the Williston and
Powder River Basins of Montana and North Dakota and the Paradox
Basin of southeastern Utah; and |
|
|
|
the Mid-Continent area, which includes the Arkoma and Anadarko
Basins of Oklahoma, the North Louisiana Salt Basin, the East
Texas Basin, and the Barnett Shale of northern Texas. |
Proved Reserves. Our estimated total proved reserves at
December 31, 2006 were 153 MMbls of oil and
307 Bcf of natural gas, based on December 31, 2006
NYMEX prices of $61.06 per Bbl of oil and $5.48 per
Mcf of natural gas. On a BOE basis, our proved reserves were
205 MMBOE at December 31, 2006.
Most Valuable Asset. The CCA represented approximately
59 percent of our total proved reserves as of
December 31, 2006. The CCA is our most valuable asset today
and in the foreseeable future. A large portion of our future
success revolves around future exploitation of and production
from this property through primary, secondary, and tertiary
recovery techniques.
Drilling. In 2006, we drilled 91 gross operated
productive wells and participated in drilling another
162 gross non-operated productive wells for a total of
253 gross productive wells for the year. On a net basis, we
drilled 73.1 operated productive wells and participated in
drilling another 18.6 non-operated productive wells in
2006. In 2006, we drilled 10 gross operated non-productive
wells and participated in drilling another eight gross
non-operated non-productive wells for a total of 18 gross
non-productive wells for the year. On a net basis, we drilled
8.4 operated non-productive wells and participated in drilling
another 1.8 non-operated non-productive wells in 2006. We
invested $348.8 million in development and exploration
activities in 2006, of which $17.3 million related to
non-productive exploratory wells.
Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Replacement. During 2006, we
added 20.1 MMBOE of oil and natural gas to our existing
proved reserve base, which replaced 179 percent of the
11.2 MMBOE we produced in
1
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
2006. Our average reserve replacement ratio for the three years
ended December 31, 2006 is 308 percent. The following
table sets forth the calculation of our reserve replacement
ratios for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three-Year | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Average | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In MBOE, except percentages) | |
Acquisition Reserve Replacement Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Proved Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of minerals-in-place
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
|
|
22,239 |
|
|
|
12,366 |
|
|
Divided by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
9,027 |
|
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition reserve replacement ratio
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
142 |
% |
|
|
246 |
% |
|
|
121 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Reserve Replacement Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Proved Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extensions, discoveries, and improved recovery
|
|
|
27,504 |
|
|
|
19,158 |
|
|
|
20,580 |
|
|
|
22,414 |
|
|
|
Revisions of estimates
|
|
|
(7,461 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(3,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development program
|
|
|
20,043 |
|
|
|
18,230 |
|
|
|
18,951 |
|
|
|
19,075 |
|
|
Divided by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
9,027 |
|
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development reserve replacement ratio
|
|
|
178 |
% |
|
|
176 |
% |
|
|
210 |
% |
|
|
187 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserve Replacement Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Proved Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of minerals-in-place
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
|
|
22,239 |
|
|
|
12,366 |
|
|
|
Extensions, discoveries, and improved recovery
|
|
|
27,504 |
|
|
|
19,158 |
|
|
|
20,580 |
|
|
|
22,414 |
|
|
|
Revisions of estimates
|
|
|
(7,461 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(3,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserve additions
|
|
|
20,107 |
|
|
|
33,026 |
|
|
|
41,190 |
|
|
|
31,441 |
|
|
Divided by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
9,027 |
|
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserve replacement ratio
|
|
|
179 |
% |
|
|
318 |
% |
|
|
456 |
% |
|
|
308 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three years ended December 31, 2006, we invested
$517.6 million in acquiring proved oil and natural gas
properties and leasehold acreage, and we invested an incremental
$863.5 million on development, exploitation, and
exploration of these and our other existing properties.
Given the inherent decline of reserves resulting from
production, an oil and natural gas company must more than offset
produced volumes with new reserves in order to grow. Management
uses the reserve replacement ratio, as defined above, as an
indicator of our ability to replenish annual production volumes
and grow our reserves. Management believes that reserve
replacement is relevant and useful information that is commonly
used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in the
oil and gas industry as a means of evaluating the operational
performance and prospects of entities engaged in the production
and sale of depleting natural resources. It should be noted that
the reserve replacement ratio is a statistical indicator that
has limitations. As an annual measure, the ratio is limited
because it typically varies widely based on the extent and
timing of new discoveries and property acquisitions. Its
predictive and comparative value is also limited for the same
reasons. In addition, since the ratio does not consider the cost
or timing of future production of new reserves, it cannot be
used as a measure of value creation. The ratio does not
2
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
distinguish between changes in reserve quantities that are
developed and those that will require additional time and
funding to develop.
Recent Developments
|
|
|
Agreement to Acquire Big Horn Basin Assets |
On January 16, 2007, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire oil and natural gas producing properties
and related assets in the Big Horn Basin from certain
subsidiaries of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
(Anadarko), for a purchase price of
$400 million, subject to customary purchase price
adjustments and closing conditions. The properties are comprised
of the Elk Basin Unit and the Gooseberry Unit in Park County,
Wyoming. Our internal engineers have estimated that total proved
reserves from these properties are approximately 20 MMBOE,
which are 97 percent oil and 90 percent proved
developed producing. The Big Horn Basin properties currently
produce approximately 4 MBOE/ D net with an additional
350 BOE/ D net of natural gas liquids produced by the Elk
Basin Gas Plant. In connection with the acquisition, we
purchased put contracts on approximately two- thirds of the
acquisitions expected production volumes at
$65.00 per Bbl for the remainder of 2007 and all of 2008.
The Big Horn Basin acquisition is expected to close in March
2007.
|
|
|
Agreement to Acquire Williston Basin Assets |
On January 23, 2007, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire oil and natural gas producing properties in
the Williston Basin from certain subsidiaries of Anadarko for a
purchase price of $410 million, subject to customary
purchase price adjustments and closing conditions. The
properties are comprised of 50 different fields across Montana
and North Dakota. Our internal engineers have estimated that
total proved reserves from these properties are approximately
21 MMBOE, which are 90 percent oil and 81 percent
proved developed producing. The Williston Basin properties
currently produce approximately 5 MBOE/ D net, will be
85 percent operated by us and will complement our existing
Rockies oil portfolio. As part of this acquisition, we are also
acquiring approximately 70,000 net acres and 800 BOE/ D of
production in the Bakken play in Montana and North Dakota. In
connection with the acquisition, we purchased put contracts on
approximately 80 percent of the acquisitions expected
production volumes at an average price of $57.50 per Bbl
for the remainder of 2007 and all of 2008. The Williston Basin
acquisition is expected to close in April 2007.
|
|
|
Intention to Form a Master Limited Partnership |
On January 17, 2007, we announced our intention to form a
master limited partnership (MLP), that will engage
in an initial public offering of common units representing
limited partner interests. The MLP is expected to own certain
Big Horn Basin properties to be acquired from certain
subsidiaries of Anadarko and certain of our legacy oil and gas
properties. We expect that the MLP will file a registration
statement on
Form S-1 with the
SEC in the second quarter of 2007 with respect to an offering in
the range of $175 million to $225 million. Any sale of
common units of the MLP would be registered under the Securities
Act of 1933, and such common units would only be offered and
sold by means of a prospectus. This Report does not constitute
an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any
securities of the MLP, and there will not be any sale of any
such securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation,
or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification
under the securities laws of such state.
|
|
|
Potential Divestiture of Mid-Continent Assets |
We are evaluating the potential sale of certain natural gas
properties in Oklahoma during 2007. The properties currently
produce approximately 3,000 to 4,000 BOE/ D and have associated
reserves of 15 to 25 MMBOE. No assurance can be given that
a sale can be completed on terms acceptable to us.
3
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
However, if successfully completed, we plan to use the net
proceeds from the sale to reduce borrowings under our revolving
credit facility.
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to maximize shareholder value
by growing our asset base, prudently investing internally
generated cash flows, efficiently operating our properties, and
maximizing long-term profitability. In order to achieve our
objectives, we strive to:
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain an active development program. Our technological
expertise, combined with our proficient field operations and
reservoir engineering, has allowed us to increase production and
reserves on our properties through infill, offset, and re-entry
drilling, workovers, and recompletions. Our plan is to maintain
an inventory of exploitation and development projects that
provide a good source of future production. We also budget a
portion of internally generated cash flow to secondary and
tertiary recovery projects that are longer- term in nature, the
benefit from which is not seen until some point in the future. |
|
|
|
Maximize existing reserves and production through HPAI.
In addition to conventional development programs, we utilize
HPAI techniques on the CCA properties to enhance our growth.
HPAI involves using compressors to inject air into producing oil
and natural gas formations in order to displace remaining
resident hydrocarbons and force them under pressure to a common
lifting point for production. |
|
|
|
Utilize other improved recovery techniques to maximize
existing reserves and production. In addition to our HPAI
programs, we use secondary and other tertiary recovery
techniques to increase production and proved reserves on
existing properties. Throughout our CCA properties and Permian
Basin properties, we have successfully used waterflood
enhancement programs to increase production. Waterflood
enhancement is a secondary recovery operation in which water is
injected into the producing formation in order to maintain
reservoir pressure and force oil toward and into the producing
wells. On certain non-operated properties in the Rockies, a
similar tertiary recovery technique that uses carbon dioxide
instead of water is being used successfully. We believe that
these other improved recovery projects, including carbon dioxide
injection, will continue to be a source of reserve and
production growth. |
|
|
|
Expand our reserves, production, and drilling inventory
through a disciplined acquisition program. Using our
experience, we have developed and refined an acquisition program
designed to increase our reserves and complement our core
properties. We have a staff of engineering and geoscience
professionals who manage our core properties and use their
experience and expertise to target and evaluate attractive
acquisition opportunities. Following an acquisition, our
technical professionals seek to enhance the value of the new
assets through a proven development and exploitation program. We
will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities with the
same disciplined commitment to acquire assets that fit our
portfolio and create value for our shareholders. |
|
|
|
Explore for reserves. With the current commodity price
environment, we believe exploration programs can provide a rate
of return comparable to property acquisitions in certain areas.
We seek to acquire undeveloped acreage and/or enter into
drilling arrangements to explore in areas that complement our
portfolio of properties. In keeping with our exploitation focus,
the exploration projects expand existing fields or could set up
multi-well exploitation projects if successful. |
|
|
|
Operate in a cost effective, efficient, and safe manner.
As of December 31, 2006, we operated properties
representing approximately 84 percent of our proved
reserves, which allows us to control capital allocation, operate
in a safe manner, and control timing of investments. |
Challenges to Implementing Our Strategy. We face a number
of challenges to implementing our strategy and achieving our
goals. One challenge is to generate superior rates of return on
our investments
4
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
in a volatile commodity pricing environment, while replenishing
our drilling inventory. Changing commodity prices and increased
costs of goods and services affect the rate of return on a
property acquisition, and the amount of our internally generated
cash flow, and, in turn, can affect our capital budget. In
addition to commodity price risk, we face strong competition
from independents and major oil companies. Our views and the
views of our competitors about future prices affect our success
in acquiring properties and the expected rate of return on each
acquisition. For more information on the challenges to
implementing our strategy and achieving our goals, please read
Item 1A. Risk Factors below.
Operations
We were the operator of properties representing approximately
84 percent of our proved reserves at December 31,
2006. As operator, we are able to better control expenses,
capital allocation, and the timing of exploitation and
development activities on our properties. We also own properties
that are operated by third parties, and, as working interest
owners in those properties, we are required to pay our share of
operating, exploitation, and development costs. Please read
Properties Nature of Our
Ownership Interests below. During the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, our approximate costs
for development activities on non-operated properties were
$50.2 million, $28.2 million, and $10.9 million,
respectively. We also own royalty interests in wells operated by
third parties that are not burdened by lease operations expense
or capital costs; however, we have little control over the
implementation of projects on these properties.
Production and Price History
The following table sets forth information regarding net
production of oil and natural gas, certain price information,
including the effects of hedging, and average costs per BOE for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
|
6,679 |
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
23,456 |
|
|
|
21,059 |
|
|
|
14,089 |
|
|
Combined (MBOE)
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
9,027 |
|
Average Daily Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls/D)
|
|
|
20,096 |
|
|
|
18,826 |
|
|
|
18,249 |
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf/D)
|
|
|
64,262 |
|
|
|
57,696 |
|
|
|
38,493 |
|
|
Combined (BOE/D)
|
|
|
30,807 |
|
|
|
28,442 |
|
|
|
24,665 |
|
Average Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
47.30 |
|
|
$ |
44.82 |
|
|
$ |
33.04 |
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
Combined (per BOE)
|
|
|
43.87 |
|
|
|
44.05 |
|
|
|
33.07 |
|
Average Costs per BOE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations expense
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
$ |
6.72 |
|
|
$ |
5.30 |
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
Derivative fair value (gain) loss
|
|
|
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
Oil marketing, net
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Producing Wells
The following table sets forth information at December 31,
2006 relating to the producing wells in which we owned a working
interest as of that date. Wells are classified as oil or natural
gas wells according to their predominant production stream.
Gross wells are the total number of producing wells in which we
have an interest, and net wells are determined by multiplying
gross wells by our average working interest. As of
December 31, 2006, we owned a working interest in
5,775 gross wells. We also held royalty interests in units
and acreage beyond the wells in which we have a working interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Wells | |
|
Natural Gas Wells | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Working | |
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Working | |
|
|
Wells(a) | |
|
Wells | |
|
Interest | |
|
Wells(a) | |
|
Wells | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CCA
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Permian Basin
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Rockies
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
Mid-Continent
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Our total wells include 2,587 operated wells and 3,188
non-operated wells. At December 31, 2006, 61 of our
wells have multiple completions. |
Acreage
The following table sets forth information at December 31,
2006 relating to our acreage holdings. Developed acreage is
assigned to producing wells. Undeveloped acreage is acreage held
under lease, permit, contract, or option that is not in a
spacing unit for a producing well, including leasehold interests
identified for exploitation or exploratory drilling. Our
undeveloped acreage in the Rockies region represents
73 percent of our total net undeveloped acreage. Our
current leases expire at various dates ranging from 2007 to
2029, with leases representing $3.2 million of cost set to
expire in 2007 if not developed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
|
Acreage | |
|
Acreage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
CCA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
110,083 |
|
|
|
104,135 |
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
62,465 |
|
|
|
50,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,548 |
|
|
|
155,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permian:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
66,132 |
|
|
|
40,350 |
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
13,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,139 |
|
|
|
54,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
64,848 |
|
|
|
39,626 |
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
491,613 |
|
|
|
384,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,461 |
|
|
|
424,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Continent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
390,869 |
|
|
|
101,023 |
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
169,867 |
|
|
|
79,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,736 |
|
|
|
180,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
631,932 |
|
|
|
285,134 |
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
738,952 |
|
|
|
529,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,370,884 |
|
|
|
814,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Drilling Results
The following table sets forth information with respect to wells
drilled during 2006, 2005, and 2004. The information should not
be considered indicative of future performance, nor should a
correlation be assumed among the number of productive wells
drilled, quantities of reserves found, or economic value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Development Wells:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
Dry holes
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploratory Wells:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Dry holes
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
Dry holes
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Activities
As of December 31, 2006, we had a total of 12 gross
(5.0 net) wells that had begun drilling and were in varying
stages of drilling operations, of which 9 gross
(4.7 net) were development wells. Also, there were
55 gross (23.5 net) wells that had reached total depth
and were in varying stages of completion pending first
production, of which 19 gross (6.2 net) wells were
exploratory wells.
Delivery Commitments and Marketing
Our oil and natural gas production is principally sold to end
users, marketers, refiners, and other purchasers having access
to nearby pipeline facilities. In areas where there is no
practical access to pipelines, oil is trucked to central storage
facilities where the oil is aggregated and sold to markets out
of these facilities. While we typically market our oil and
natural gas production for a term of one year or less, we
entered into an agreement in 2004 to sell at least
4,500 Bbls/ D at a floating market price through 2009.
For 2006, our largest purchasers included Shell Trading Company
and ConocoPhillips Company, which accounted for 15 percent
and 12 percent of total 2006 revenue, respectively. Our
marketing of oil and natural gas can be affected by factors
beyond our control, the potential effects of which cannot be
accurately predicted. Management believes that the loss of any
one purchaser would not have a material adverse effect on our
ability to market our oil and natural gas production.
The marketing of our CCA oil production is mainly dependent on
transportation through the Bridger, Poplar, and Butte pipelines
to markets in the Guernsey, Wyoming area. Recently, alternative
transportation routes and markets have been developed by moving
a portion of the crude oil production through Enbridge pipeline
to the Clearbrook, Minnesota hub. In addition, new markets to
the west have been identified and a portion of our crude oil is
being moved that direction through the Rocky Mountain Pipeline.
To a lesser extent, our production also depends on
transportation through Platte Pipeline to Wood River, Illinois as
7
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
well as other pipelines connected to the Guernsey, Wyoming area.
While shipments on Platte Pipeline are currently oversubscribed
and subject to apportionment since December 2005, we were
allocated transportation effective January 1, 2007.
However, further restrictions on available capacity to transport
oil through any of the above mentioned pipelines, or any other
pipelines, or any interruption in refining throughput capacity
could have a material adverse effect on our production volumes
and the prices we receive for our production.
The difference between quoted market prices and the price
received at the wellhead for oil and natural gas production is
commonly referred to as a differential. We expect the
differential between the NYMEX price of crude oil and the
wellhead price we receive to slightly improve in the first
quarter of 2007 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2006. In
recent years, production increases from competing Canadian and
Rocky Mountain producers, in conjunction with limited refining
and pipeline capacity from the Rocky Mountain area, have
gradually widened this differential. We cannot accurately
predict crude oil differentials. Natural gas differentials are
expected to remain approximately constant in the first quarter
of 2007 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2006. Increases in
the differential between the NYMEX price for oil and natural gas
and the wellhead price we receive could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial position, and
cash flows.
Competition
The oil and natural gas industry is highly competitive. We
encounter strong competition from other independent operators
and from major oil companies in acquiring properties,
contracting for drilling equipment and securing trained
personnel. Many of these competitors have financial and
technical resources and staffs substantially larger than ours.
As a result, our competitors may be able to pay more for
desirable leases, or to evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater
number of properties or prospects than our financial or
personnel resources will permit.
We are also affected by competition for drilling rigs and the
availability of related equipment. In the past, the oil and
natural gas industry has experienced shortages of drilling rigs,
equipment, pipe and personnel, which has delayed development
drilling and other exploitation activities and has caused
significant price increases. We are unable to predict when, or
if, such shortages may occur or how they would affect our
development and exploitation program.
Competition is also strong for attractive oil and natural gas
producing properties, undeveloped leases and drilling rights,
and we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
satisfactorily when attempting to make further acquisitions.
Environmental Matters and Regulation
General. Our operations are subject to stringent and
complex federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing
environmental protection, including air emissions, water
quality, wastewater discharged, and solid waste management.
These laws and regulations may, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
require the acquisition of various permits before drilling
commences; |
|
|
|
require the installation of expensive pollution control
equipment; |
|
|
|
enjoin some or all of the operations of facilities deemed in
non-compliance with permits; |
|
|
|
restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various
substances that can be released into the environment in
connection with oil and natural gas drilling, production, and
transportation activities; |
|
|
|
restrict the way in which wastes are handled and disposed; |
|
|
|
limit or prohibit drilling activities on certain lands lying
within wilderness, wetlands, areas inhabited by threatened of
endangered species, and other protected areas; |
8
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former and
ongoing operations, such as requirements to close pits and plug
abandoned wells; |
|
|
|
impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from
operations; and |
|
|
|
require preparation of a Resource Management Plan, Environmental
Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement for
operations affecting federal lands or leases. |
These laws, rules, and regulations may also restrict the rate of
oil and natural gas production below the rate that would
otherwise be possible. The regulatory burden on the oil and
natural gas industry increases the cost of doing business in the
industry and consequently affects profitability. Additionally,
Congress and federal and state agencies frequently revise
environmental laws and regulations, and the clear trend in
environmental regulation is to place more restrictions and
limitations on activities that may affect the environment. Any
changes that result in increased compliance costs or additional
operating restrictions, including costly waste handling,
disposal, and cleanup requirements for the oil and natural gas
industry could have a significant impact on our operating costs.
The following is a discussion of relevant environmental and
safety laws and regulations that relate to our operations.
Waste Handling. The Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), and comparable state statutes, regulate
the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal,
and cleanup of hazardous and non-hazardous solid wastes. Under
the auspices of the federal Environmental Protection Agency (the
EPA), the individual states administer some or all
of the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their
own, more stringent requirements. Drilling fluids, produced
waters, and most of the other wastes associated with the
exploration, development, and production of crude oil or natural
gas are currently regulated under RCRAs non-hazardous
waste provisions. However, it is possible that certain oil and
natural gas exploration and production wastes now classified as
non-hazardous could be classified as hazardous wastes in the
future. Any such change could result in an increase in our costs
to manage and dispose of wastes, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
position. Also, in the course of our operations, we generate
some amounts of ordinary industrial solid wastes, such as paint
wastes, waste solvents, and waste oils that may be regulated as
hazardous wastes.
Site Remediation. The Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA),
also known as the Superfund law, imposes joint and several
liability, without regard to fault or legality of conduct, on
classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the
release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These
persons include the current and past owner or operator of the
site where the release occurred, and anyone who disposed or
arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance released at
the site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and
several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment, for
damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health
studies. CERCLA authorizes the EPA, and in some cases third
parties, to take actions in response to threats to the public
health or the environment and to seek to recover from the
responsible classes of persons the costs they incur. In
addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and
other third parties to file claims for personal injury and
property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances
released into the environment.
We currently own, lease, or operate numerous properties that
have been used for oil and natural gas exploration and
production for many years. Although petroleum, including crude
oil, and natural gas are excluded from CERCLAs definition
of hazardous substance, in the course of our
ordinary operations, we generate wastes that may fall within the
definition of a hazardous substance. We believe that
we have utilized operating and waste disposal practices that
were standard in the industry at the time, yet hazardous
substances, wastes, or hydrocarbons may have been released on or
under the properties owned or leased by us, or on or under other
locations, including off-site locations, where such substances
have been taken for disposal. In addition, some of our
properties have been operated by third parties or by
9
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
previous owners or operators whose treatment and disposal of
hazardous substances, wastes, or hydrocarbons was not under our
control. In fact, there is evidence that petroleum spills or
releases have occurred in the past at some of the properties
owned or leased by us. These properties and the substances
disposed or released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA, and
analogous state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to
remove previously disposed substances and wastes, remediate
contaminated property, or perform remedial plugging or pit
closure operations to prevent future contamination.
Water Discharges. The Clean Water Act and analogous state
laws impose strict controls against the discharge of pollutants,
including spills and leaks of oil and other substances, into
waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into
regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the
terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state
agency. The Clean Water Act regulates storm water run-off from
oil and gas facilities and requires a storm water discharge
permit for certain activities. Such a permit requires the
regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off
from its operations. The Clean Water Act and regulations
implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and
fill material in wetlands and other waters of the United States
unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. Spill
prevention, control, and countermeasure requirements of the
Clean Water Act require appropriate containment berms and
similar structures to help prevent the contamination of
navigable waters in the event of a petroleum hydrocarbon tank
spill, rupture, or leak. Federal and state regulatory agencies
can impose administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for
non-compliance with discharge permits or other requirements of
the Clean Water Act and analogous state laws and regulations.
The primary federal law for oil spill liability is the Oil
Pollution Act (OPA), which addresses three principal
areas of oil pollution prevention, containment, and
cleanup. OPA applies to vessels, offshore facilities, and
onshore facilities, including exploration and production
facilities that may affect waters of the United States. Under
OPA, responsible parties, including owners and operators of
onshore facilities, may be subject to oil cleanup costs and
natural resource damages as well as a variety of public and
private damages that may result from oil spills.
Air Emissions. Oil and gas exploration and production
operations are subject to the Federal Clean Air Act, and
comparable state laws and regulations. These laws and
regulations regulate emissions of air pollutants from various
industrial sources, including oil and natural gas exploration
and production facilities, and also impose various monitoring
and reporting requirements. Such laws and regulations may
require a facility to obtain pre-approval for the construction
or modification of certain projects or facilities expected to
produce air emissions or result in the increase of existing air
emissions, obtain and strictly comply with air permits
containing various emissions and operational limitations, or
utilize specific emission control technologies to limit
emissions.
Permits and related compliance obligations under the Clean Air
Act, as well as changes to state implementation plans for
controlling air emissions in regional non-attainment areas, may
require oil and natural gas exploration and production
operations to incur future capital expenditures in connection
with the addition or modification of existing air emission
control equipment and strategies. In addition, some oil and
natural gas facilities may be included within the categories of
hazardous air pollutant sources, which are subject to increasing
regulation under the Clean Air Act. Failure to comply with these
requirements could subject a regulated entity to monetary
penalties, injunctions, conditions or restrictions on
operations, and enforcement actions. Oil and natural gas
exploration and production facilities may be required to incur
certain capital expenditures in the future for air pollution
control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining
operating permits and approvals for air emissions.
Congress is currently considering proposed legislation directed
at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It is not
possible at this time to predict how legislation that may be
enacted to address greenhouse gas emissions would impact the oil
and gas exploration and production business. However, future
laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs
or additional operating restrictions,
10
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
and could have a material adverse effect on the business,
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Activities on Federal Lands. Oil and natural gas
exploration and production activities on federal lands are
subject to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
NEPA requires federal agencies, including the Department of
Interior, to evaluate major agency actions having the potential
to significantly impact the environment. In the course of such
evaluations, an agency will prepare an Environmental Assessment
that assesses the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts of a proposed project and, if necessary, will prepare a
more detailed Environmental Impact Statement that may be made
available for public review and comment. All of our current
exploration and production activities, as well as proposed
exploration and development plans, on federal lands require
governmental permits that are subject to the requirements of
NEPA. This process has the potential to delay the development of
oil and natural gas projects.
Occupational Safety and Health Act (the OSH Act)
and Other Laws and Regulation. We are subject to the
requirements of the OSH Act and comparable state statutes. These
laws and the implementing regulations strictly govern the
protection of the health and safety of employees. The
Occupational Safety and Health Administrations hazard
communication standard, EPA community
right-to-know
regulations under the Title III of CERCLA and similar state
statutes require that we organize and/or disclose information
about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations. We
believe that we are in substantial compliance with these
applicable requirements and with other OSH Act and comparable
requirements.
We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all
existing environmental laws and regulations applicable to our
current operations and that our continued compliance with
existing requirements will not have a material adverse impact on
our financial condition and results of operations. Accidental
spills or releases may occur in the course of our operations,
and we cannot assure you that we will not incur substantial
costs and liabilities as a result of such spills or releases,
including those relating to claims for damage to property and
persons. Moreover, we cannot assure you that the passage of more
stringent laws or regulations in the future will not have a
negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or ability to make distributions to you.
Other Regulation of the Oil and Natural Gas Industry
The oil and natural gas industry is extensively regulated by
numerous federal, state, and local authorities. Legislation
affecting the oil and natural gas industry is under constant
review for amendment or expansion, frequently increasing the
regulatory burden. Also, numerous departments and agencies, both
federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue rules and
regulations binding on the oil and natural gas industry and its
individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties
for failure to comply. Although the regulatory burden on the oil
and natural gas industry increases our cost of doing business
and, consequently, affects our profitability, these burdens
generally do not affect us any differently or to any greater or
lesser extent than they affect other companies in the industry
with similar types, quantities, and locations of production.
Legislation continues to be introduced in Congress and
development of regulations continues in the Department of
Homeland Security and other agencies concerning the security of
industrial facilities, including oil and natural gas facilities.
Our operations may be subject to such laws and regulations.
Presently, it is not possible to accurately estimate the costs
we could incur to comply with any such facility security laws or
regulations, but such expenditures could be substantial.
Drilling and Production. Our operations are subject to
various types of regulation at federal, state, and local levels.
These types of regulation include requiring permits for the
drilling of wells, drilling bonds,
11
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
and reports concerning operations. Most states, and some
counties and municipalities, in which we operate also regulate
one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the location of wells; |
|
|
|
the method of drilling and casing wells; |
|
|
|
the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells
are drilled; |
|
|
|
the plugging and abandoning of wells; and |
|
|
|
notice to surface owners and other third parties. |
State laws regulate the size and shape of drilling and spacing
units or proration units governing the pooling of oil and
natural gas properties. Some states allow forced pooling or
integration of tracts to facilitate exploration while other
states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In some
instances, forced pooling or unitization may be implemented by
third parties and may reduce our interest in the unitized
properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish
maximum rates of production from oil and natural gas wells,
generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and
impose requirements regarding the ratability of production.
These laws and regulations may limit the amount of oil and
natural gas we can produce from our wells or limit the number of
wells or the locations at which we can drill. Moreover, each
state generally imposes a production or severance tax with
respect to the production and sale of oil, natural gas, and
natural gas liquids within its jurisdiction.
Natural Gas Regulation. The availability, terms, and cost
of transportation significantly affect sales of natural gas. The
interstate transportation and sale for resale of natural gas is
subject to federal regulation, including regulation of the
terms, conditions and rates for interstate transportation,
storage and various other matters, primarily by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (the FERC). Federal and
state regulations govern the price and terms for access to
natural gas pipeline transportation. The FERCs regulations
for interstate natural gas transmission in some circumstances
may also affect the intrastate transportation of natural gas.
Although natural gas prices are currently unregulated, Congress
historically has been active in the area of natural gas
regulation. We cannot predict whether new legislation to
regulate natural gas might be proposed, what proposals, if any,
might actually be enacted by Congress or the various state
legislatures, and what effect, if any, the proposals might have
on the operations of the underlying properties. Sales of
condensate and natural gas liquids are not currently regulated
and are made at market prices.
State Regulation. The various states regulate the
drilling for, and the production, gathering and sale of, oil and
natural gas, including imposing severance taxes and requirements
for obtaining drilling permits. Reduced rates may apply to
certain types of wells and production methods, such as new
wells, renewed wells, and tertiary production.
States also regulate the method of developing new fields, the
spacing and operation of wells, and the prevention of waste of
oil and natural gas resources. States may regulate rates of
production and may establish maximum daily production allowables
from oil and natural gas wells based on market demand or
resource conservation, or both. States do not regulate wellhead
prices or engage in other similar direct economic regulation,
but there can be no assurance that they will not do so in the
future. The effect of these regulations may be to limit the
amounts of oil and natural gas that may be produced from our
wells, and to limit the number of wells or locations we can
drill.
Federal, State, or Native American Leases. Our operations
on federal, state, or Native American oil and natural gas leases
are subject to numerous restrictions, including
nondiscrimination statutes. Such operations must be conducted
pursuant to certain
on-site security
regulations and other permits and authorizations issued by the
Bureau of Land Management, Minerals Management Service, and
other agencies.
12
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Operating Hazards and Insurance
The oil and natural gas business involves a variety of operating
risks, including fires, explosions, blowouts, environmental
hazards, and other potential events that can adversely affect
our operations. Any of these problems could adversely affect our
ability to conduct operations and cause us to incur substantial
losses. Such losses could reduce or eliminate the funds
available for exploration, exploitation, or leasehold
acquisitions or result in loss of properties.
In accordance with industry practice, we maintain insurance
against some, but not all, potential risks and losses. We do not
carry business interruption insurance. We may not obtain
insurance for certain risks if we believe the cost of available
insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In
addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not
fully insurable at a reasonable cost. If a significant accident
or other event occurs that is not fully covered by insurance, it
could adversely affect us.
Employees
We had 236 employees as of December 31, 2006, 80 of which
were field personnel. None of the employees are represented by
any union. We consider our relations with our employees to be
good.
Principal Executive Office
We are a Delaware corporation with our headquarters in Texas.
Our principal executive offices are located at 777 Main
Street, Suite 1400, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. Our
main telephone number is
(817) 877-9955.
Available Information
We make available electronically, free of charge through our
website (www.encoreacq.com), our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current
reports on
Form 8-K, and
other items filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with or furnish such material
to the SEC. In addition, you may read and copy any materials
that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The
public may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC
maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers, like us, that file electronically with the
SEC.
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that
applies to all directors, officers, and employees, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The
code of business conduct and ethics is available on our Internet
website (www.encoreacq.com). In the event that we make
changes in, or provide waivers from, the provisions of this code
of business conduct and ethics that the SEC or the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) require us to disclose, we
intend to disclose these events on our website.
We have filed the required certifications under Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2
to this Report. In 2006, we submitted to the NYSE the CEO
certification required by Section 303A.12(a) of the
NYSEs Listed Company Manual. In 2007, we expect to submit
this certification to the NYSE after the annual meeting of
stockholders.
Our board of directors (the Board) currently has
four standing committees: (i) audit,
(ii) compensation, (iii) nominating and corporate
governance, and (iv) special stock award. The charters of
our audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance
committees are available on our website. Copies of the code of
business conduct and ethics and Board committee charters are
also available in print upon written request to the Corporate
Secretary, Encore Acquisition Company, 777 Main Street,
Suite 1400, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
13
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
The information on our website or any other website is not
incorporated by reference into this Report.
Properties
|
|
|
Nature of Our Ownership Interests |
The following table sets forth the net production, proved
reserve quantities, and
PV-10 values of our
properties in our principal areas of operation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserve Quantities | |
|
PV-10 | |
|
|
2006 Net Production | |
|
at December 31, 2006 | |
|
at December 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Natural | |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil | |
|
Gas | |
|
Total | |
|
Percent | |
|
Oil | |
|
Gas | |
|
Total | |
|
Amount(a) | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(MBbls) | |
|
(MMcf) | |
|
(MBOE) | |
|
|
|
(MBbls) | |
|
(MMcf) | |
|
(MBOE) | |
|
(in thousands) | |
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
117,868 |
|
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
120,493 |
|
|
$ |
1,113,352 |
|
|
|
57% |
|
Permian Basin
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
23,105 |
|
|
|
106,693 |
|
|
|
40,887 |
|
|
|
302,669 |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Rockies
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
8,716 |
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
9,198 |
|
|
|
426,160 |
|
|
|
22% |
|
Mid-Continent
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
15,925 |
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
181,426 |
|
|
|
33,983 |
|
|
|
119,035 |
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
23,456 |
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
153,434 |
|
|
|
306,764 |
|
|
|
204,561 |
|
|
$ |
1,961,216 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Calculated as the pretax present value of estimated future
revenues to be generated from the production of proved reserves,
net of estimated production and future development costs, using
prices and costs as of the date of estimation without future
escalation, without giving effect to hedging activities and
non-property related expenses such as general and administrative
expenses, debt service, and depletion, depreciation, and
amortization; and discounted using an annual discount rate of
10 percent. Giving effect to hedging transactions, our
PV-10 value would have
been decreased by $21.7 million at December 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
The Standardized Measure at December 31, 2006 is
$1.5 billion. Standardized Measure differs from
PV-10 by
$499.4 million because Standardized Measure includes the
effect of future income taxes. Since we are taxed at the
corporate level, future income taxes are determined on a
combined property basis and cannot be accurately subdivided
among our core areas. Therefore, we feel
PV-10 provides the best
method for assessing relative value of each of our areas. |
The estimates of our proved oil and natural gas reserves are
based on estimates prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd.
(Miller and Lents), independent petroleum engineers.
Guidelines established by the SEC regarding the present value of
future net revenues were used to prepare these reserve
estimates. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of
estimating recoverable amounts of underground accumulations of
oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact way. The
accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of
available data and the interpretation of that data by petroleum
engineers. In addition, the results of drilling, testing, and
production activities may require revisions of estimates that
were made previously. Accordingly, estimates of reserves and
their value are inherently imprecise and are subject to constant
revision and change, and they should not be construed as
representing the actual quantities of future production or cash
flows to be realized from oil and natural gas properties or the
fair market value of such properties.
14
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
During 2006, we filed estimates of oil and natural gas reserves
at December 31, 2005 with the U.S. Department of
Energy on
Form EIA-23. As
required for the EIA-23, the filing reflected only production
that comes from our operated wells at year end, and is reported
on a gross basis. Those estimates came directly from our reserve
report prepared by Miller and Lents.
|
|
|
CCA Properties Montana and North Dakota |
Our initial purchase of interests in the CCA was on June 1,
1999, and we have subsequently acquired additional working
interests from various owners. Presently, we operate
99.7 percent of our CCA properties with an average working
interest of approximately 89 percent in the oil wells and
31 percent in the gas wells. The average daily production
from our CCA properties during 2006 was 13,898 BOE/ D.
The CCA is a major structural feature of the Williston Basin in
southeastern Montana and northwestern North Dakota. Our acreage
is concentrated on the two to six mile wide crest of
the CCA, giving us access to the greatest accumulation of oil in
the structure. Our holdings extend for approximately
120 continuous miles along the crest of the CCA across five
counties in two states. Primary producing reservoirs are the Red
River, Stony Mountain, Interlake, and Lodgepole formations at
depths of between 7,000 and 9,000 feet.
Since taking over operations, our net production from the CCA
has increased by approximately 80 percent from 7,807 BOE/ D
(average for June 1999) to 14,032 BOE/ D (average for the
fourth quarter of 2006). We have accomplished ongoing production
growth through a combination of:
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition of additional interests; |
|
|
|
effective management of the existing wellbores; |
15
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
the addition of strategically positioned new horizontal and
vertical wellbores; |
|
|
|
re-entry horizontal drilling using existing wellbores; |
|
|
|
waterflood enhancements; and |
|
|
|
implementation of our HPAI program. |
In 2006, we drilled 33 gross wells on the CCA, of which 11
were horizontal re-entry wells that (i) reestablished
production from non-producing wells, (ii) added additional
production to existing producing wells, or (iii) served as
injection wells for secondary and tertiary recovery projects.
Including our HPAI project, we invested $103.9 million,
$121.7 million, and $116.5 million in capital projects
on the CCA during 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Our outlook for CCA production growth remains strong. We plan to
continue the development of the reserve base using the same
strategies that gave rise to our past success with this property.
As outlined above, the CCA represents approximately
59 percent of our total proved reserves as of
December 31, 2006. The CCA represents our most valuable
asset today and in the foreseeable future. A large portion of
our future success revolves around current and future projects
on these properties.
We began implementation of two new improved waterfloods in the
CCA in 2006. One in South Pine Unit in the Red River U4 and one
in the Coral Creek Unit in the Red River U4. We believe these
projects have added significant reserves in the Red River U4 and
expect to see results in early 2008.
HPAI. In 2002, we initiated a HPAI project on the CCA
that injects air into the Red River U4 zone. The Red River
U4 zone is the same zone where HPAI has been successfully
implemented by other operators in adjacent areas on the CCA. We
have seen positive results from this HPAI project at the Pennel
and Little Beaver units. We believe that HPAI technology can be
applied to other units in the CCA and that it may yield
significant new reserves.
In the Pennel unit, we are currently injecting 36 MMcf/ D
of high pressure from our new HPAI injection facility completed
in April 2005. The HPAI facility is capable of injecting
60 MMcf/ D of high pressure air into the Pennel unit,
giving us the capacity to complete the development of this unit
and potentially expand to the Coral Creek unit to the South. The
Pennel unit is responding to the air injection below our
original production expectations, with an increase of
approximately 400 BOE/ D over the expected production
decline prior to the initiation of the project. In the Little
Beaver unit of the CCA we are currently injecting 18 MMcf/
D of high pressure air. We continue to see positive production
response, with an increase of approximately 800 BOE/ D over the
expected production decline prior to the initiation of the
project.
We believe that much of our acreage in the CCA has potential
opportunities for utilizing HPAI recovery techniques at economic
rates of return. We continue to evaluate and perform engineering
studies on these projects. Over the next several years, we plan
to study, engineer, and implement these development projects
initially in the Red River U4 zone of the CCA.
Additionally, we have other zones in the CCA that currently
produce oil and may provide additional HPAI opportunities.
Net Profits Interests (NPI). A major portion
of our acreage position in the CCA is subject to NPI ranging
from one percent to 50 percent. The holders of these NPIs
are entitled to receive a fixed percentage of the cash flow
remaining after specified costs have been subtracted from net
revenue. The net profits calculations are contractually defined.
In general, net profits are determined after considering
operating expense, overhead expense, interest expense, and
drilling costs. The amounts of reserves and production
attributable to NPIs are deducted from our reserves and
production data, and our revenues are reported net of NPI
payments. The reserves and production attributed to NPIs are
calculated by dividing estimated future NPI payments (in the
case of reserves) or prior period actual NPI payments (in the
case of production) by commodity prices at the determination
date. Fluctuations in commodity prices and the
16
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
levels of development activities in the CCA from period to
period will impact the reserves and production attributed to the
NPIs and will have an inverse effect on our reported reserves
and production. For 2006, 2005, and 2004, we reduced revenue for
NPI payments by $23.4 million, $21.2 million, and
$12.6 million, respectively.
|
|
|
Permian Basin Properties West Texas and New
Mexico |
Average daily production for our Permian Basin properties in the
fourth quarter of 2006 was 5,940 BOE/ D. We believe these
properties will be an area of growth over the next several
years. During 2006, we invested approximately $63.8 million
of development capital on our Permian Basin properties.
Our Permian Basin properties include seventeen operated fields,
including the East Cowden Grayburg Unit, Fuhrman-Mascho,
Crockett County, Sand Hills, Howard Glasscock, Nolley, Deep
Rock, and others; and seven non-operated fields. Production from
the central portion of the Permian Basin comes from multiple
reservoirs, including the Grayburg, San Andres, Glorietta,
Clearfork, Wolfcamp, and Pennsylvanian zones. Production from
the southern portion of the Permian Basin comes mainly from the
Canyon and Strawn formations with multiple pay intervals.
Continued development opportunities remain on these properties.
During 2006, we drilled 43 gross wells on the West Texas
Permian properties.
In March 2006, we entered into a joint development agreement
with ExxonMobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) to develop
legacy natural gas fields in West Texas. The agreement covers
certain formations in the Parks, Pegasus, and Wilshire Fields in
Midland and Upton Counties, the Brown Bassett Field in Terrell
County, and Block 16, Coyanosa, and Waha Fields in Ward,
Pecos, and Reeves Counties. Targeted formations include the
Barnett, Devonian, Ellenberger, Mississippian, Montoya,
Silurian, Strawn, and Wolfcamp horizons.
Under the terms of the agreement, we will have the opportunity
to develop approximately 100,000 gross acres. We will earn
30 percent of ExxonMobils working interest and
22.5 percent of ExxonMobils net revenue interest in
each well drilled. We will operate each well during the drilling
and completion phase, after which ExxonMobil will assume
operational control of the well.
We will earn the right to participate in all fields by drilling
a total of 24 commitment wells. During the commitment
phase, ExxonMobil will have the option to receive non-recourse
advanced funds from us attributable to ExxonMobils
70 percent working interest in each commitment well. Once a
commitment well is producing, ExxonMobil will repay
95 percent of the advanced funds plus accrued interest
assessed on the unpaid balance through our monthly receipt of
future proceeds of oil and natural gas sales. As an alternative
to receiving advanced funds during the commitment phase,
ExxonMobil can elect to pay their share of capital costs for
each well. After we have fulfilled our obligations under the
commitment phase, we will be entitled to a 30 percent
working interest in future drilling locations. We will have the
right to propose and drill wells for as long as we are engaged
in continuous drilling operations.
In April 2006, we commenced drilling in the development areas
and by June 2006 operated four drilling rigs. A total of
24 wells were drilled during 2006, of which 12 were
commitment wells. By the end of the year, we had fulfilled our
obligation in two development areas (Brown Bassett Wolfcamp and
Wilshire Devonian).
In 2007, we intend to drill approximately 50 wells, 12 of
which are commitment wells, and invest approximately
$65 million of net capital in the development areas. We
anticipate operating six rigs in West Texas by the end of 2007.
17
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
The New Mexico region was established in May 2006 with the
strategy of deploying capital to develop low to medium risk
drilling projects in southeastern New Mexico where multiple
reservoir targets are available. The region expects to grow
reserves through:
|
|
|
|
|
Entering into joint ventures; |
|
|
|
Agreements with major oil and gas companies; |
|
|
|
Drill to earn agreements; |
|
|
|
Farm-outs of close-in exploitation opportunities; and |
|
|
|
Establish built-in partnerships with other independent
exploration companies. |
Since May 2006, we have acquired or farmed-in approximately
10,500 gross acres and identified and secured approximately
30 low-risk infill locations. In 2006, we drilled three operated
wells and participated in two non-operated wells. The first well
was drilled in August 2006 and it encountered three potential
pay intervals. We own an 85 percent working interest in
this well. The second well is 100 percent owned by us and
is currently waiting on pipeline connection.
We believe this region will be one of growth and opportunity. We
expect to increase the value of the New Mexico region through
conventional infill drilling opportunities throughout 2007.
|
|
|
Mid-Continent Properties Oklahoma, Arkansas,
East Texas, North Texas, Kansas, and North Louisiana |
|
|
|
Oklahoma, Arkansas, North Texas, and Kansas |
We own various interests, including operated, non-operated,
royalty, and mineral interests, on properties located in the
Anadarko Basin of western Oklahoma and the Arkoma Basin of
eastern Oklahoma and eastern Arkansas. These properties produce
primarily natural gas and, to a lesser extent, oil from various
horizons. We also have operated interests in properties
producing from the Barnett Shale in northern Texas and the
Hugoton Basin in Kansas.
Average daily production for these properties increased
approximately 20 percent from 25,317 Mcfe/ D in the
fourth quarter of 2005 to 30,430 Mcfe/ D for the fourth
quarter of 2006.
During 2006, we drilled 129 wells and invested
$125.5 million of development and exploration capital in
these properties.
We are planning to evaluate the potential sale of certain
natural gas properties in Oklahoma during 2007. The properties
currently produce approximately 3,000 to 4,000 BOE/ D and have
associated reserves of 15 to 25 MMBOE. No assurance can be
given that a sale can be completed on terms acceptable to the
Company. However, if successfully completed, we plan to use the
net proceeds from the sale to reduce borrowings under our
revolving credit facility.
|
|
|
North Louisiana Salt Basin and East Texas Basin |
The North Louisiana Salt Basin and East Texas Basin properties
consist of operated working interests, non-operated working
interests, and undeveloped leases acquired primarily in the Elm
Grove and Overton acquisitions in 2004. Our interests acquired
in the Elm Grove acquisition are located in the Elm Grove Field
in Bossier Parish, Louisiana, and include non-operated working
interests ranging from one percent to 47 percent across
1,800 net acres in 15 sections.
The Overton Field assets are in the same core area as our
interests in Elm Grove field and have similar geology. The
properties are producing primarily from multiple tight sandstone
reservoirs in the
18
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Travis Peak and Lower Cotton Valley formations at depths ranging
between 8,000 and 11,500 feet. Estimated proved reserves
are approximately 94 percent natural gas, and the
properties are 100 percent operated by us.
During 2006, we drilled 60 gross wells and invested
approximately $44.4 million of capital to develop these
properties. Average daily production for this region decreased
18 percent from 25,800 Mcfe/ D in the fourth quarter
of 2005 to 21,092 Mcfe/ D for the fourth quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
Rocky Mountain Properties North Dakota,
Montana, and Utah |
|
|
|
Williston Basin North Dakota and Montana |
The Williston Basin properties consist of working and overriding
royalty interests in several geographically concentrated fields.
The properties are located in the Williston Basin in western
North Dakota and eastern Montana, near our CCA properties. The
average daily production from the Williston Basin properties was
978 BOE/ D for the fourth quarter of 2006. During 2006, we
invested approximately $0.7 million of capital to develop
these properties.
The Bell Creek properties are located in the Powder River Basin
of southeastern Montana. We operate the seven production units
that comprise the Bell Creek properties, each with a
100 percent working interest. The shallow (less than
5,000 feet) Cretaceous-aged Muddy Sandstone reservoir
produces oil. We invested $2.8 million of capital in these
properties in 2006. The average daily production from the Bell
Creek properties was 453 BOE/ D during the fourth quarter
of 2006. We have initiated a pilot polymer injection program on
our Bell Creek properties. We inject a polymer into an injection
well to reduce the amount of water injection needed to recover
oil. The polymer injection process also redirects the injected
water into new pathways to produce oil previously by passed by
the original waterflood. This process, coupled with polymer
treatments to oil producers, makes for a more efficient recovery
of oil than standard waterflooding. Our polymer pilot, if
successful, will be expanded in phases. We expect to see results
from our pilot project by early 2008.
The Paradox Basin properties, located in southeast Utahs
Paradox Basin, are divided between two prolific oil producing
units: the Ratherford Unit and the Aneth Unit both operated by
Resolute Natural Resources Company. Our average net production
from the properties for the fourth quarter of 2006 was
approximately 704 BOE/ D. We believe these properties have
potential horizontal redevelopment, secondary development, and
tertiary recovery potential. Our development capital for these
properties was $5.0 million during 2006.
Title to Properties
We believe that we have satisfactory title to our oil and
natural gas properties in accordance with standards generally
accepted in the oil and natural gas industry.
Our properties are subject, in one degree or another, to one or
more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
royalties, overriding royalties, NPIs, and other burdens under
oil and natural gas leases; |
|
|
|
contractual obligations, including, in some cases, development
obligations arising under operating agreements, farmout
agreements, production sales contracts, and other agreements
that may affect the properties or their titles; |
|
|
|
liens that arise in the normal course of operations, such as
those for unpaid taxes, statutory liens securing unpaid
suppliers and contractors, and contractual liens under operating
agreements; |
19
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
pooling, unitization and communitization agreements,
declarations, and orders; and |
|
|
|
easements, restrictions,
rights-of-way, and
other matters that commonly affect property. |
We believe that the burdens and obligations affecting our
properties do not in the aggregate materially interfere with the
use of the properties. As indicated under Net Profits
Interests above, a major portion of our acreage position
in the CCA, our primary asset, is subject to NPIs.
We have granted mortgage liens on substantially all of our oil
and natural gas properties in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as
agent, to secure borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
These mortgages and the revolving credit facility contain
substantial restrictions and operating covenants that are
customarily found in loan agreements of this type.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should read carefully the following factors and all other
information contained in this Report. If any of the risks and
uncertainties described below or elsewhere in this Report
actually occur, our business, financial condition, or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case,
the trading price of our common stock could decline, and an
investor may lose all or part of his investment.
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas prices are volatile and sustained
periods of low prices could materially and adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows. |
The oil and natural gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot
predict future oil and natural gas prices. Prices for oil and
natural gas may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor
changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas,
market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are
beyond our control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign supply of and demand for oil and natural
gas; |
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
overall domestic and global economic conditions; |
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in oil and natural gas
producing countries, including those in the Middle East and
South America; |
|
|
|
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and
other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and
production controls; |
|
|
|
impact of the U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil and natural
gas prices; |
|
|
|
technological advances affecting energy consumption; |
|
|
|
armed conflict in oil and natural gas producing countries; |
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxation; |
|
|
|
the impact of energy conservation efforts; |
|
|
|
the proximity, capacity, cost and availability of oil and
natural gas pipelines and other transportation
facilities; and |
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels. |
20
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Our revenue, profitability, and cash flow depend upon the prices
and demand for oil and natural gas, and a drop in prices can
significantly affect our financial results and impede or stop
our growth. In particular, declines in commodity prices will:
|
|
|
|
|
negatively impact the value of our reserves, because declines in
oil and natural gas prices would reduce the amount of oil and
natural gas that we can produce economically; |
|
|
|
reduce the amount of cash flow available for capital
expenditures and repayment of indebtedness; |
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow money or raise additional
capital; and |
|
|
|
impair our ability to pay distributions. |
In addition, the prices that we receive for our oil and natural
gas production usually trade at a discount to the relevant
benchmark prices, such as NYMEX. In recent years, production
increases from competing Canadian and Rocky Mountain producers,
in conjunction with limited refining and pipeline capacity from
the Rocky Mountain area, have gradually widened this
differential. We cannot accurately predict future differentials.
|
|
|
Our estimated proved reserves are based on many
assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Any material
inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying
assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present
value of our reserves. |
It is not possible to measure underground accumulations of oil
or natural gas in an exact way. Oil and natural gas reserve
engineering requires subjective estimates of recoverable amounts
of underground accumulations of oil and natural gas and
assumptions concerning future oil and natural gas prices,
production levels, and operating and development costs. In
estimating our level of oil and natural gas reserves, we and our
independent reserve engineers make certain assumptions that may
prove to be incorrect, including assumptions relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
future oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
production levels; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
operating and development costs; |
|
|
|
the effects of regulation; and |
|
|
|
availability of funds. |
If these assumptions prove to be incorrect, our estimates of
reserves, the economically recoverable quantities of oil and
natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties,
the classifications of reserves based on risk of recovery and
our estimates of the future net cash flows from our reserves
could change significantly. Our standardized measure is
calculated using unhedged oil prices and is determined in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Over time,
we may make material changes to reserve estimates to take into
account changes in our assumptions and the results of actual
drilling and production.
The reserve estimates we make for fields that do not have a
lengthy production history are less reliable than estimates for
fields with lengthy production histories. A lack of production
history may contribute to inaccuracy in our estimates of proved
reserves, future production rates and the timing of development
expenditures.
The present value of future net cash flows from our estimated
proved reserves is not necessarily the same as the current
market value of our estimated proved oil and natural gas
reserves. We base the estimated discounted future net cash flows
from our estimated proved reserves on prices and costs in effect
21
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
on the day of estimate. However, actual future net cash flows
from our oil and natural gas properties also will be affected by
factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the actual prices we receive for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
our actual operating costs in producing oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
the amount and timing of actual production; |
|
|
|
the amount and timing of our capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
supply of and demand for oil and natural gas; and |
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or taxation. |
The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses
in connection with the development and production of oil and
natural gas properties will affect the timing of actual future
net cash flows from proved reserves, and thus their actual
present value. In addition, the 10 percent discount factor
we use when calculating discounted future net cash flows in
compliance with the Financial Accounting Standards Boards
(FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 69 may not be the most appropriate
discount factor based on interest rates in effect from time to
time and risks associated with us or the oil and natural gas
industry in general.
|
|
|
The failure to replace our reserves could adversely affect
our financial condition. |
Our future success depends upon our ability to find, develop, or
acquire additional oil and natural gas reserves that are
economically recoverable. Our proved reserves generally decline
when reserves are produced, unless we conduct successful
exploitation, development, or exploration activities or acquire
properties containing proved reserves, or both. We may not be
able to find, develop, or acquire additional reserves on an
economic basis.
Substantial capital is required to replace and grow reserves. If
lower oil and natural gas prices or operating difficulties
result in our cash flow from operations being less than expected
or limit our ability to borrow under our revolving credit
facility, we may be unable to expend the capital necessary to
find, develop, or acquire new oil and natural gas reserves.
|
|
|
The results of HPAI techniques are uncertain. |
We utilize HPAI techniques on some of our properties and plan to
use the techniques in the future on a portion of our properties,
including our CCA properties. The additional production and
reserves attributable to our use of HPAI techniques, if any, are
inherently difficult to predict. If our HPAI programs do not
allow for the extraction of residual hydrocarbons in the manner
or to the extent that we anticipate, or the cost of implementing
these techniques increases beyond our expectations, our future
results of operations and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
We may be required to write down our asset carrying
values. |
We may be required to write down the carrying value of our oil
and natural gas properties if:
|
|
|
|
|
oil and natural gas prices decrease; |
|
|
|
we make substantial downward adjustments to our estimated proved
reserves; |
|
|
|
our operating expenses or development costs increase
substantially; or |
|
|
|
we experience poor performance from our development and
exploitation activities. |
We capitalize the costs to acquire, find, and develop our oil
and natural gas properties under the successful efforts
accounting method. We review the carrying value of our
properties quarterly, based on
22
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
changes in expectations of future oil and natural gas prices,
expenses, tax rates, and other factors. To the extent such
reviews indicate a reduction of the estimated useful life or
estimated future cash flows of our assets, the carrying value
may not be recoverable and therefore require a write-down. We
may incur impairment charges in the future, which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations in the
period incurred and on our ability to borrow funds under our
revolving credit facility.
|
|
|
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable
terms, our future growth may be limited. |
Acquisitions are an essential part of our growth strategy, and
our ability to acquire additional properties on favorable terms
is important to our long-term growth. We may be unable to make
acquisitions because we are:
|
|
|
|
|
unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or
negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with them; |
|
|
|
unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on
economically acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
outbid by competitors; or |
|
|
|
unable to obtain necessary regulatory approvals. |
In making acquisitions, we must make a number of important
assumptions regarding, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
expected revenues; |
|
|
|
the level of recoverable reserves and production; |
|
|
|
future oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
operating costs; and |
|
|
|
the nature and amount of potential environmental and other
liabilities. |
The accuracy of these assessments is inherently uncertain. In
connection with these assessments, we perform a review of the
subject properties that we believe to be generally consistent
with industry practices. Our review will not reveal all existing
or potential problems nor will it permit us to become
sufficiently familiar with the properties to fully assess their
deficiencies and capabilities. Inspections may not always be
performed on every well, and structural and environmental
problems are not necessarily observable even when an inspection
is undertaken. Even when problems are identified, the seller may
be unwilling or unable to provide effective contractual
protection against all or part of the problems. We are often not
entitled to contractual indemnification for environmental
liabilities and acquire properties on an as is basis.
Future acquisitions, including the proposed Big Horn Basin and
Williston Basin acquisitions, could result in our incurring
additional debt, contingent liabilities, and expenses, all of
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and operating results. Furthermore, our financial
position and results of operations may fluctuate significantly
from period to period based on whether significant acquisitions
are completed in particular periods. Competition for
acquisitions is intense and may increase the cost of, or cause
us to refrain from, completing acquisitions.
23
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
The failure to properly manage growth through acquisitions
could adversely affect our results of operations. |
Growing through acquisitions and managing that growth will
require us to continue to invest in operational, financial, and
management information systems and to attract, retain, motivate,
and effectively manage our employees. Pursuing and integrating
acquisitions involves a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of management attention from existing operations; |
|
|
|
unexpected losses of key employees, customers, and suppliers of
the acquired business; |
|
|
|
conforming the financial, technological, and management
standards, processes, procedures, and controls of the acquired
business with those of our existing operations; and |
|
|
|
increasing the scope, geographic diversity, and complexity of
our operations. |
The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing
operations, including the proposed Big Horn Basin and Williston
Basin acquisitions, may result in unforeseen operating
difficulties and may require significant management attention
and financial resources that would otherwise be available for
the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations.
|
|
|
A substantial portion of our producing properties is
located in one geographic area. |
We have extensive operations in the Williston Basin of Montana
and North Dakota. As of December 31, 2006, our CCA
properties in the Williston Basin represented approximately
59 percent of our proved reserves and 45 percent of
our 2006 production. Any circumstance or event that negatively
impacts production or marketing of oil and natural gas in the
Williston Basin would materially reduce our earnings and cash
flow.
|
|
|
Derivative instruments expose us to risks of financial
loss in a variety of circumstances. |
We use derivative instruments in an effort to mitigate the
negative effects of declining commodity prices. Our actual
future production may be significantly higher or lower than we
estimate at the time we enter into derivative transactions for
such period. If the actual amount is higher than we estimate, we
will have greater commodity price exposure than we intended. If
the actual amount is lower than the nominal amount that is
subject to our derivative financial instruments, we might be
forced to satisfy all or a portion of our derivative
transactions without the benefit of the cash flow from our sale
or purchase of the underlying physical commodity, resulting in a
substantial diminution of our liquidity. As a result of these
factors, our derivative activities may not be as effective as we
intend in reducing the volatility of our cash flows, and in
certain circumstances may actually increase the volatility of
our cash flows. In addition, our derivative activities are
subject to the following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
a counterparty may not perform its obligation under the
applicable derivative instrument; and |
|
|
|
there may be a change in the expected differential between the
underlying commodity price in the derivative instrument and the
actual price received resulting in either a drop in the price we
receive for production that is not offset by an increase in cash
inflows from the derivative or vice versa. |
In addition, derivative instruments may limit our ability to
realize additional revenue from increases in the prices for oil
and natural gas.
During July 2006, we elected to discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively for all commodity derivatives which were
previously accounted for as hedges. While this change has no
effect on cash flows, results of operations are affected by
mark-to-market gains
and losses, which fluctuate with the swings in oil and natural
gas prices.
24
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
We have limited control over the activities on properties
we do not operate. |
Other companies operate some of the properties in which we have
an interest. We have limited ability to influence or control the
operation or future development of these non-operated properties
or the amount of capital expenditures that we are required to
fund with respect to them. Our dependence on the operator and
other working interest owners for these projects and our limited
ability to influence or control the operation and future
development of these properties could materially adversely
affect the realization of our targeted returns on capital in
drilling or acquisition activities and lead to unexpected future
costs.
|
|
|
Drilling for and producing oil and natural gas are costly
and high-risk activities with many uncertainties that could
adversely affect our financial condition or results of
operations. |
The cost of drilling, completing, and operating a well is often
uncertain, and many factors can adversely affect the economics
of a well. Our efforts will be uneconomical if we drill dry
holes or wells that are productive but do not produce enough oil
and natural gas to be commercially viable after drilling,
operating and other costs. Furthermore, our drilling and
producing operations may be curtailed, delayed, or canceled as a
result of other factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
high costs, shortages or delivery delays of drilling rigs,
equipment, labor, or other services; |
|
|
|
unexpected operational events and drilling conditions; |
|
|
|
reductions in oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
limitations in the market for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; |
|
|
|
facility or equipment malfunctions; |
|
|
|
equipment failures or accidents; |
|
|
|
title problems; |
|
|
|
pipe or cement failures; |
|
|
|
casing collapses; |
|
|
|
compliance with environmental and other governmental
requirements; |
|
|
|
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills,
pipeline ruptures, and discharges of toxic gases; |
|
|
|
lost or damaged oilfield drilling and service tools; |
|
|
|
unusual or unexpected geological formations; |
|
|
|
loss of drilling fluid circulation; |
|
|
|
pressure or irregularities in formations; |
|
|
|
fires; |
|
|
|
natural disasters; |
|
|
|
blowouts, surface craterings and explosions; and |
|
|
|
uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids. |
If any of these factors were to occur with respect to a
particular field, we could lose all or a part of our investment
in the field, or we could fail to realize the expected benefits
from the field, either of which could materially and adversely
affect our revenue and profitability.
25
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
Our operations are subject to operational hazards and
unforeseen interruptions for which we may not be adequately
insured. |
There are a variety of operating risks inherent in our wells,
gathering systems, pipelines and other facilities, such as
leaks, explosions, mechanical problems, and natural disasters,
all of which could cause substantial financial losses. Any of
these or other similar occurrences could result in the
disruption of our operations, substantial repair costs, personal
injury or loss of human life, significant damage to property,
environmental pollution, impairment of our operations and
substantial revenue losses. The location of our wells, gathering
systems, pipelines, and other facilities near populated areas,
including residential areas, commercial business centers and
industrial sites, could significantly increase the level of
damages resulting from these risks.
We do not maintain insurance against the loss of oil or natural
gas reserves as a result of operating hazards, nor do we
maintain business interruption insurance. In addition, pollution
and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. We
may experience losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks or
losses in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. The
occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance
could harm our financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Terrorist activities and the potential for military and
other actions could adversely affect our business. |
The threat of terrorism and the impact of military and other
action have caused instability in world financial markets and
could lead to increased volatility in prices for oil and natural
gas, all of which could adversely affect the markets for our
operations. Future acts of terrorism could be directed against
companies operating in the United States. The
U.S. government has issued public warnings that indicate
that energy assets might be specific targets of terrorist
organizations. These developments have subjected our operations
to increased risk and, depending on their ultimate magnitude,
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
|
|
|
Our development, exploitation, and exploration operations
require substantial capital, and we may be unable to obtain
needed financing on satisfactory terms. |
We make and will continue to make substantial capital
expenditures in development, exploitation, and exploration
projects. For example, our Board recently adopted a
$285 million capital budget for 2007, excluding
acquisitions. We intend to finance these capital expenditures
through a combination of cash flow from operations and external
financing arrangements. Additional financing sources may be
required in the future to fund our capital expenditures.
Financing may not continue to be available under existing or new
financing arrangements, or on acceptable terms, if at all. If
additional capital resources are not available, we may be forced
to curtail our drilling and other activities or be forced to
sell some of our assets on an untimely or unfavorable basis.
|
|
|
The loss of key personnel could adversely affect our
business. |
We depend to a large extent on the efforts and continued
employment of I. Jon Brumley, our Chairman of the Board, Jon S.
Brumley, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and other
key personnel. The loss of the services of Mr. I. Jon
Brumley, Mr. Jon S. Brumley, or other key personnel could
adversely affect our business, and we do not have employment
agreements with, and do not maintain key person insurance on the
lives of, any of these persons.
Our drilling success and the success of other activities
integral to our operations will depend, in part, on our ability
to attract and retain experienced geologists, engineers, and
other professionals. Competition for experienced geologists,
engineers, and some other professionals is extremely intense and
the cost of attracting and retaining technical personnel has
increased significantly in recent years. If we cannot retain our
technical personnel or attract additional experienced technical
personnel, our ability to compete could
26
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
be harmed. Furthermore, escalating personnel costs could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
|
|
|
Our business depends on gathering and transportation
facilities owned by others. Any limitation in the availability
of those facilities could interfere with our ability to market
our oil and natural gas production and could harm our
business. |
The marketability of our oil and natural gas production depends
in part on the availability, proximity, and capacity of
pipelines, oil and natural gas gathering systems, and processing
facilities. The amount of oil and natural gas that can be
produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain
circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled
and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical
damage, or lack of contracted capacity on such systems. The
curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may
last from a few days to several months. In many cases, we are
provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these
circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant
curtailment in gathering system or pipeline capacity could
reduce our ability to market our oil and natural gas production
and harm our business.
|
|
|
Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is
intense, and many of our competitors have greater financial,
technological, and other resources than we do. |
We operate in the highly competitive areas of oil and natural
gas acquisition, development, exploitation, and production. The
oil and natural gas industry is characterized by rapid and
significant technological advancements and introductions of new
products and services using new technologies. We face intense
competition from independent, technology-driven companies as
well as from both major and other independent oil and natural
gas companies in each of the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring desirable producing properties or new leases for
future exploration; |
|
|
|
marketing our oil and natural gas production; |
|
|
|
integrating new technologies; and |
|
|
|
acquiring the equipment and expertise necessary to develop and
operate our properties. |
Many of our competitors have financial, technological, and other
resources substantially greater than ours, which may adversely
affect our ability to compete with these companies. These
companies may be able to pay more for development prospects and
productive oil and natural gas properties and may be able to
define, evaluate, bid for, and purchase a greater number of
properties and prospects than our financial or human resources
permit. Further, these companies may enjoy technological
advantages and may be able to implement new technologies more
rapidly than we can. Our ability to develop and exploit our oil
and natural gas properties and to acquire additional properties
in the future will depend upon our ability to successfully
conduct operations, implement advanced technologies, evaluate
and select suitable properties, and consummate transactions in
this highly competitive environment.
|
|
|
We are subject to complex federal, state, and local laws
and regulations that could adversely affect our business. |
Exploration, development, production, and sale of oil and
natural gas in North America are subject to extensive federal,
state, and local laws and regulations. In order to conduct our
operations in compliance with these laws and regulations, we
must obtain and maintain numerous permits, approvals, and
certificates from various federal, state, and local governmental
authorities. We may be required to make large expenditures to
comply with applicable laws and regulations, which could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. Matters subject to regulation include discharge
permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds, spacing of
wells, unitization and pooling of properties, environmental
protection, reports concerning operations, and taxation.
27
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of
environmental and safety requirements applicable to our oil and
natural gas exploration and production activities. These costs
and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal,
state, and local environmental and safety laws and regulations,
including regulations and enforcement policies, which have
tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to
comply with these laws and regulations may result in the
assessment of administrative, civil, and criminal penalties,
imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, and
to a lesser extent, issuance of injunctions to limit or cease
operations. In addition, claims for damages to persons or
property may result from environmental and other impacts of our
operations. We do not believe that full insurance coverage for
all potential environmental damages is available at a reasonable
cost, and we may need to expend significant financial and
managerial resources to comply with environmental regulations
and permitting requirements. We could incur substantial
additional costs and liabilities in our oil and natural gas
operations as a result of stricter environmental laws,
regulations, and enforcement policies.
Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may
result in the suspension or termination of our operations and
subject us to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties.
Further, these laws and regulations could change in ways that
substantially increase our costs. Any of these liabilities,
penalties, suspensions, terminations, or regulatory changes
could make it more expensive for us to conduct our business or
cause us to limit or curtail some of our operations.
|
|
|
We have significant indebtedness and may incur significant
additional indebtedness, which could negatively impact our
financial condition, results of operations, and business
prospects. |
As of December 31, 2006, we had total debt of
$661.7 million and stockholders equity of
$816.9 million. Together with our subsidiaries, we may
incur substantially more debt in the future. Although our
revolving credit facility and the indentures governing our
senior subordinated notes contain restrictions on our incurrence
of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a
number of qualifications and exceptions, and under certain
circumstances, indebtedness incurred in compliance with these
restrictions could be substantial. Also, these restrictions do
not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute
indebtedness. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$460.9 million of available borrowing capacity under our
revolving credit facility, subject to specific requirements,
including compliance with financial covenants.
We recently announced agreements to acquire producing properties
and related assets in the Big Horn Basin and Williston Basin
from subsidiaries of Anadarko for an aggregate purchase price of
$810 million, subject to customary purchase price
adjustments. We initially intend to fund the acquisition of
these properties and related assets through additional
borrowings under one or more credit facilities. Our future debt
reduction efforts will be subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, and there can be no assurances that such efforts
will be successful.
Our debt level could have several important consequences to you,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
we may have difficulties borrowing money in the future for
acquisitions, to meet our operating expenses, or for other
purposes; |
|
|
|
the amount of our interest expense may increase because certain
of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest, which, if
interest rates increase, could result in higher interest expense; |
|
|
|
we will need to use a portion of the money we earn to pay
principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the amount
of money we have to finance our operations and other business
activities; |
|
|
|
we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse
developments in our industry; and |
|
|
|
our debt level could limit our flexibility in planning for, or
reacting to, changes in our business and industry. |
28
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Our ability to meet our expenses and debt obligations will
depend on our future performance, which will be affected by
financial, business, economic, regulatory, and other factors,
many of which are beyond our control. Our earnings may not be
sufficient to allow us to pay the principal and interest on our
debt and meet our other obligations. If we do not have enough
money to pay our debts, we may be required to refinance all or
part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money, or
raise equity, which we may not be able to do on terms acceptable
to us, if at all. Further, failing to comply with the financial
and other restrictive covenants in our debt agreements could
result in an event of default under such indebtedness, which
could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
There were no unresolved SEC staff comments as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are a party to ongoing legal proceedings in the ordinary
course of business. Management does not believe the result of
these legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect
on us.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
There were no matters submitted to stockholders during the
fourth quarter of 2006.
29
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES |
Our common stock, $0.01 par value, is listed on the NYSE
under the symbol EAC. The following table sets forth
quarterly high and low sales prices of our common stock for each
quarterly period of 2006 and 2005, as adjusted retroactively to
reflect a 3-for-2 stock split that occurred on July 12,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31
|
|
$ |
27.62 |
|
|
$ |
22.45 |
|
Quarter ended September 30
|
|
|
30.97 |
|
|
|
22.63 |
|
Quarter ended June 30
|
|
|
32.59 |
|
|
|
22.75 |
|
Quarter ended March 31
|
|
|
36.84 |
|
|
|
28.16 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31
|
|
$ |
39.37 |
|
|
$ |
29.69 |
|
Quarter ended September 30
|
|
|
39.48 |
|
|
|
28.63 |
|
Quarter ended June 30
|
|
|
29.63 |
|
|
|
22.12 |
|
Quarter ended March 31
|
|
|
30.48 |
|
|
|
21.44 |
|
On February 20, 2007, the closing sales price of our common
stock as reported by the NYSE was $24.99 per share. On
February 20, 2007, we had approximately
286 shareholders of record.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes purchases of our common stock
during the fourth quarter of 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Maximum Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
of Shares That May | |
|
|
Total Number | |
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly | |
|
Yet Be Purchased | |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Average Price | |
|
Announced Plans | |
|
Under the Plans or | |
Month |
|
Purchased | |
|
Paid per Share | |
|
or Programs | |
|
Programs | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
October
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
November(a)
|
|
|
17,809 |
|
|
$ |
25.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17,809 |
|
|
$ |
25.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
We do not have a formal common stock repurchase program. During
the fourth quarter of 2006, certain employees surrendered shares
of common stock to pay income tax withholding obligations in
conjunction with vesting of restricted shares under our 2000
Incentive Stock Plan. |
Dividends
No dividends have been declared or paid on our common stock. We
anticipate that we will retain all future earnings and other
cash resources for the future operation and development of our
business. Accordingly, we do not intend to declare or pay any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future
dividends will be at the discretion of the Board after taking
into account many factors, including our operating results,
financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs, and
plans for expansion. The declaration and payment of dividends is
restricted by our existing revolving credit facility and the
indentures governing our Notes. Future debt agreements may also
restrict our ability to pay dividends.
30
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares our cumulative total stockholder
return during the period from January 1, 2002 to
December 31, 2006 with total stockholder return during the
same period for the Independent Oil and Gas Index and the
Standard & Poors 500 Index. The graph assumes
that $100 was invested in our common stock and each index on
January 1, 2002 and that all dividends were reinvested. The
following graph is being furnished pursuant to SEC rules. It
will not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
we specifically incorporate it by reference.
Comparison of Total Return Since January 1, 2002 Among
Encore
Acquisition Company, the Standard & Poors 500
Index, and the
Independent Oil and Gas Index
31
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be
read in conjunction with Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(h) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and per unit data) | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$ |
346,974 |
|
|
$ |
307,959 |
|
|
$ |
220,649 |
|
|
$ |
176,351 |
|
|
$ |
134,854 |
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
146,325 |
|
|
|
149,365 |
|
|
|
77,884 |
|
|
|
43,745 |
|
|
|
25,838 |
|
|
|
Oil marketing(e)
|
|
|
147,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
640,862 |
|
|
$ |
457,324 |
|
|
$ |
298,533 |
|
|
$ |
220,096 |
|
|
$ |
160,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
92,398 |
|
|
$ |
103,425 |
(b) |
|
$ |
82,147 |
|
|
$ |
63,641 |
(c) |
|
$ |
37,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share(d):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding(d):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
51,865 |
|
|
|
48,682 |
|
|
|
47,090 |
|
|
|
45,153 |
|
|
|
45,047 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
52,736 |
|
|
|
49,522 |
|
|
|
47,738 |
|
|
|
45,500 |
|
|
|
45,242 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
297,333 |
|
|
$ |
292,269 |
|
|
$ |
171,821 |
|
|
$ |
123,818 |
|
|
$ |
91,509 |
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(397,430 |
) |
|
|
(573,560 |
) |
|
|
(433,470 |
) |
|
|
(153,747 |
) |
|
|
(159,316 |
) |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
99,206 |
|
|
|
281,842 |
|
|
|
262,321 |
|
|
|
17,303 |
|
|
|
80,749 |
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls)
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
|
6,679 |
|
|
|
6,601 |
|
|
|
6,037 |
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
23,456 |
|
|
|
21,059 |
|
|
|
14,089 |
|
|
|
9,051 |
|
|
|
8,175 |
|
|
Combined (BOE)
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
9,027 |
|
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
7,399 |
|
Average Sales Price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
47.30 |
|
|
$ |
44.82 |
|
|
$ |
33.04 |
|
|
$ |
26.72 |
|
|
$ |
22.34 |
|
|
Natural gas ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
Combined ($/BOE)
|
|
|
43.87 |
|
|
|
44.05 |
|
|
|
33.07 |
|
|
|
27.14 |
|
|
|
21.72 |
|
Average Costs per BOE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations(f)
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
$ |
6.72 |
|
|
$ |
5.30 |
|
|
$ |
4.70 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
Exploration(f)
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative(f)
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
Derivative fair value (gain) loss(g)
|
|
|
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
Oil marketing, net(e)
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(h) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and per unit data) | |
Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls)
|
|
|
153,434 |
|
|
|
148,387 |
|
|
|
134,048 |
|
|
|
117,732 |
|
|
|
111,674 |
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
306,764 |
|
|
|
283,865 |
|
|
|
234,030 |
|
|
|
138,950 |
|
|
|
99,818 |
|
|
Combined (BOE)
|
|
|
204,561 |
|
|
|
195,698 |
|
|
|
173,053 |
|
|
|
140,890 |
|
|
|
128,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
(40,745 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,566 |
) |
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
12,489 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,006,900 |
|
|
|
1,705,705 |
|
|
|
1,123,400 |
|
|
|
672,138 |
|
|
|
549,896 |
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
661,696 |
|
|
|
673,189 |
|
|
|
379,000 |
|
|
|
179,000 |
|
|
|
166,000 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
816,865 |
|
|
|
546,781 |
|
|
|
473,575 |
|
|
|
358,975 |
|
|
|
296,266 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003,
and 2002 we reduced revenue for NPI payments by
$23.4 million, $21.2 million, $12.6 million,
$5.8 million, and $2.0 million, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 includes an
after-tax loss on early redemption of debt of
$12.2 million, which affects its comparability with other
periods presented. |
|
(c) |
|
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes
$0.9 million income from the cumulative effect of
accounting change, net of tax, which affects its comparability
with other periods presented. |
|
(d) |
|
Net income per common share and the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding have been revised for years prior to
2005 for the effects of the 3-for-2 stock split in July 2005. |
|
(e) |
|
In 2006, we began purchasing third-party oil Bbls from a
counterparty other than to whom the Bbls were sold for
aggregation and sale with our own equity production. |
|
(f) |
|
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). Due to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, non-cash stock-based compensation expense in all
prior periods presented has been reclassified to allocate the
amount to the same respective income statement lines as the
employees salary, cash bonus, and benefits. This resulted
in increases in LOE of $1.3 million, $0.7 million, and
$0.2 million during 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively,
increases in general and administrative (G&A)
expense of $2.6 million, $1.1 million, and
$0.4 million during 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, and
increases in exploration expense of $41 thousand and $29
thousand during 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(g) |
|
During July 2006, we elected to discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively for all commodity derivatives which were
previously accounted for as hedges. From that point forward, all
mark-to-market gains or
losses on these derivative instruments are recorded in
Derivative fair value (gain) loss while in
periods prior to that point, only the ineffective portions of
hedges were recorded in Derivative fair value
(gain) loss. |
|
(h) |
|
We acquired Crusader Energy Corporation (Crusader)
in October 2005 and Cortez Oil & Gas, Inc.
(Cortez) in April 2004. The operating results or
these entities are included in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations from the date of acquisition forward. |
33
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION |
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated
financial position and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and notes and the
supplemental oil and natural gas disclosures included in
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data. The following discussion and analysis contains
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation,
statements relating to our plans, strategies, objectives,
expectations, intentions, and resources. The words
anticipate, estimate,
expect, project, intend,
plan, believe, should, and
similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Actual
results could differ materially from those stated in the
forward-looking statements. We do not undertake to update,
revise, or correct any of the forward-looking information unless
required to do so under federal securities laws. Readers are
cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in
conjunction with our disclosures under the headings:
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
below and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Introduction
In this managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations, the following will be
discussed and analyzed:
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of Business |
|
|
|
2006 Highlights |
|
|
|
2007 Outlook |
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of 2006 to 2005 |
|
|
|
Comparison of 2005 to 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Resources |
|
|
|
Capital Commitments |
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
|
|
|
Inflation and Changes in Prices |
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates |
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements |
Overview of Business
We engage in the acquisition, development, exploitation,
exploration, and production of oil and natural gas reserves from
onshore fields in the United States. Our business strategies
include:
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining an active development program; |
|
|
|
Maximizing existing reserves and production through HPAI; |
|
|
|
Utilizing other improved recovery techniques to maximize
existing reserves and production; |
|
|
|
Expanding our reserves, production, and drilling inventory
through a disciplined acquisition program; |
34
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
Exploring for reserves; and |
|
|
|
Operating in a cost effective, efficient, and safe manner. |
Our financial results and ability to generate cash depend upon
many factors, particularly the price of oil and natural gas. Oil
prices continued to strengthen in 2006, with average NYMEX
prices increasing in each of the past three years. However, our
oil wellhead differentials to NYMEX widened somewhat in 2006 as
we realized 82 percent of the average NYMEX oil price.
Natural gas prices deteriorated in 2006 as compared to 2005, but
average NYMEX prices remain higher than historical averages.
Natural gas prices were at an all-time high in 2005 with an
average front month NYMEX price of $8.96 per Mcf. The
market softened somewhat in 2006 with the average NYMEX price
for the year of $6.11 per Mcf, though our differentials
strengthened as we realized 94 percent of the average NYMEX
natural gas price. Commodity prices are influenced by many
factors that are outside of our control. We cannot predict
future commodity benchmark or wellhead prices. For this reason,
we attempt to mitigate the effect of commodity price risk by
entering into commodity derivative contracts for a portion of
our future production.
During 2006, we did not make a significant acquisition of proved
reserves. Instead, we acquired unproved acreage in our core
areas and continued to make significant investments within our
core areas to develop proved undeveloped reserves and increase
production from proved developed reserves through various
secondary and tertiary recovery techniques, including our HPAI
program in the CCA. See 2007 Outlook below for
discussion of significant acquisitions since year-end.
We continue to believe that a portfolio of long-lived quality
assets will position us for future success, and that reserve
replacement is a key statistical measure of our success in
growing our asset base. During 2006, we replaced
179 percent of our 2006 production primarily as a result of
drilling and improved recovery success. Please read
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties
General Oil and Natural Gas Reserve
Replacement for the calculation of our reserve replacement
ratios.
We continue to see positive results from our Phase 1 and 2
of our CCA HPAI project, although results were about
300 Bbls below our original expectations as a result of
(1) a lack of sustained air injection due to delays in
converting injection wells, (2) faulty seal assemblies in
injection wells, and (3) different reservoir qualities and
characteristics throughout the fields. Our independent reserve
engineers, Miller and Lents, estimated that we added
7.0 MMBbls, 3.2 MMBbls, and 9.1 MMBbls of proved
oil reserves associated with our HPAI program during 2006, 2005,
and 2004, respectively. Over the long term, we believe that HPAI
technology can be successfully applied throughout the CCA.
2006 Highlights
Our financial and operating results for 2006 include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas reserves increased five percent to
205 MMBOE. During 2006, we added 20.1 MMBOE, replacing
179 percent of the 11.2 MMBOE produced in 2006. Please
read Items 1 and 2. Business and
Properties General Oil and Natural Gas
Production and Reserves for the calculation of our reserve
replacement ratios. At December 31, 2006, oil reserves
accounted for 75 percent of total proved reserves, and
65 percent of proved reserves are developed. However,
primarily as a result of a decline in natural gas prices, the
estimated pretax present value of our reserves decreased by
27 percent to $2.0 billion (using a 10 percent
discount rate and constant year end prices of $61.06 for oil and
$5.48 for natural gas). The Standardized Measure at
December 31, 2006 was $1.5 billion. Standardized
Measure differs from
PV-10 by
$499.4 million, because Standardized Measure includes the
effect of future income taxes. |
|
|
|
During 2006, we had oil and natural gas revenues of
$493.3 million. This represents an eight percent increase
over the $457.3 million of oil and natural gas revenues
reported in 2005. |
35
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
Our realized average oil price for 2006, including the effects
of hedging, increased $2.48 per Bbl to $47.30 per Bbl
as compared to $44.82 per Bbl in 2005. Average oil
differentials more than doubled in 2006 to $11.80 per Bbl
as compared to $5.50 per Bbl in 2005, which somewhat offset
higher production volumes and higher wellhead prices. Our
realized average natural gas price for 2006, including the
effects of hedging, decreased $0.85 per Mcf to
$6.24 per Mcf as compared to $7.09 per Mcf in 2005. |
|
|
|
Production volumes for 2006 increased eight percent to
30,807 BOE/ D (11.2 MMBOE), compared with 2005
production volumes of 28,442 BOE/ D (10.4 MMBOE). The rise
in production volumes was attributable to our drilling program,
HPAI uplift, and acquisitions completed in the second half of
2005. Oil represented 65 percent and 66 percent of our
total production volumes in 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
During 2006, we generated cash flows from operating activities
of $297.3 million. This represents a five percent increase
over the $292.3 million of cash flows from operating
activities we reported for 2005. |
|
|
|
On April 4, 2006, we closed a public offering of
4.0 million shares of common stock at a price of
$32.00 per share. The net proceeds of the offering, after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and the
expenses of the offering, were $127.1 million. We used the
net proceeds to reduce the amounts outstanding under our
revolving credit facility, invest in oil and natural gas
activities, and to pay general corporate expenses. |
|
|
|
We reported net income of $92.4 million, or $1.75 per
diluted share, in 2006, as compared to $103.4 million, or
$2.09 per diluted share, for 2005. In addition to the
increase in the effective tax rate that decreased net income by
$4.7 million, the decrease in net income was primarily due
to the following pretax items: |
|
|
|
|
|
Our natural gas wellhead price was $1.28 per Mcf less in
2006 than 2005 which negatively impacted revenues and margins; |
|
|
|
Increased service costs, expensing of stock options, high
operating costs in the Mid-Continent area, and expensing of HPAI
costs for LOE in 2006 resulted in an increase of
$28.5 million, or $2.01 per BOE; |
|
|
|
DD&A per BOE increased to $10.09 per BOE as compared to
$8.25 per BOE in 2005 as a result of higher than historical
finding and development costs, which added $27.8 million to
total DD&A; |
|
|
|
Exploration expense was $16.1 million higher due to a
larger exploration program in 2006 than 2005; and |
|
|
|
Interest expense increased by $11.1 million in 2006 as
compared to 2005 as a result of higher average debt levels due
to financing acquisitions and our capital program. |
|
|
|
Partially offsetting the above items, the change in net income
was positively impacted by the following pretax items: |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value gain increased $29.8 million,
primarily as a result of our discontinuance of hedge accounting
in July 2006; and |
|
|
|
The recognition of a $19.5 million loss on the early
redemption of debt in 2005. |
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share were lower as a result of the above
items and the aforementioned public offering of common stock in
April. |
|
|
|
|
|
We entered into a joint development agreement with ExxonMobil to
develop seven natural gas fields in West Texas. Under the terms
of the agreement, we have the opportunity to develop |
36
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 100,000 gross acres and will earn
30 percent of ExxonMobils working interest in each
well drilled. We will operate each well during the drilling and
completion phase, after which ExxonMobil will assume operational
control of the well. In 2006, we drilled 24 wells, 12 of
which were commitment wells, with an investment of
$29.5 million under the joint development agreement. At
December 31, 2006, we had advanced $22.4 million to
ExxonMobil for its portion of drilling these commitment wells. |
|
|
|
We invested $377.6 million in oil and natural gas
activities during 2006 (excluding asset retirement obligations
of $0.9 million). Of this amount, we invested
$348.7 million in development, exploitation, HPAI
expansion, and exploration activities, which yielded
253 gross (91.6 net) productive wells, and
$28.9 million on acquisitions primarily of undeveloped
leases. We operated between 9 and 12 rigs during 2006, including
4 rigs related to our west Texas joint development
agreement. |
2007 Outlook
On January 16, 2007, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire oil and natural gas producing properties
and related assets in the Big Horn Basin from certain
subsidiaries of Anadarko, for a purchase price of
$400 million, subject to customary purchase price
adjustments and closing conditions. The properties are comprised
of the Elk Basin Unit and the Gooseberry Unit in Park County,
Wyoming. Our internal engineers have estimated that total proved
reserves from these properties are approximately 20 MMBOE,
which are 97 percent oil and 90 percent proved
developed producing. The Big Horn Basin properties currently
produce approximately 4 MBOE/ D net with an additional 350
BOE/ D net of natural gas liquids produced by the Elk Basin Gas
Plant. In connection with the acquisition, we purchased put
contracts on approximately two-thirds of the acquisitions
expected production volumes at $65.00 per Bbl for the
remainder of 2007 and all of 2008. The Big Horn Basin
acquisition is expected to close in March 2007.
On January 23, 2007, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire oil and natural gas producing properties in
the Williston Basin from certain subsidiaries of Anadarko for a
purchase price of $410 million, subject to customary
purchase price adjustments and closing conditions. The
properties are comprised of 50 different fields across Montana
and North Dakota. As part of this acquisition, we are also
acquiring approximately 70,000 net acres and 800 BOE/ D of
production in the Bakken play in Montana and North Dakota. Our
internal engineers have estimated that total proved reserves
from these properties are approximately 21 MMBOE, which are
90 percent oil and 81 percent proved developed
producing. The Williston Basin properties currently produce
approximately 5 MBOE/ D net, will be 85 percent operated by
us and will complement our existing Rockies oil portfolio. In
connection with the acquisition, we purchased put contracts on
approximately 80 percent of the acquisitions expected
production volumes at an average price of $57.50 per Bbl
for the remainder of 2007 and all of 2008. The Williston Basin
acquisition is expected to close in April 2007.
On January 17, 2007, we announced an intention to form a
MLP that will engage in an initial public offering of common
units representing limited partner interests. The MLP is
expected to own certain Big Horn Basin properties to be acquired
from certain subsidiaries of Anadarko and certain of our legacy
oil and gas properties. We expect that a registration statement
on Form S-1 for
the MLP will be filed with the SEC in the second quarter of 2007
with respect to an offering in the range of $175 million to
$225 million. Any sale of common units of the MLP would be
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, and such common
units would only be offered and sold by means of a prospectus.
This Report does not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of any offer to buy any securities of the MLP, and
there will not be any sale of any such securities in any state
in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful
prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws
of such state.
37
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
During 2007, we plan to reduce debt by implementing the
following initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
Invest an amount equal to or less than our cash flows from
operations; |
|
|
|
Evaluate the potential divestiture of certain Oklahoma natural
gas properties; and |
|
|
|
Raise capital through an initial public offering of limited
partnership interests in the MLP. |
Our debt reduction plans are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that such plans
will be successful.
For 2007, the Board has approved the following $285 million
capital budget for oil and natural gas related activities,
excluding proved property acquisitions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and exploitation
|
|
$ |
202,000 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
Acquisitions of leasehold acreage
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
285,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The prices we receive for our oil and natural gas production are
largely based on current market prices, which are beyond our
control. For comparability and accountability, we take a
constant approach to budgeting commodity prices. We presently
analyze our inventory of capital projects based on the current
NYMEX strip prices. If NYMEX prices trend downward for a
sustained period of time, we may reevaluate our capital
projects. If commodity prices are significantly lower than
current NYMEX strip prices, it could have a material effect on
our results of operations in 2007. In this case, we would have
to borrow additional money under our existing revolving credit
facility, attempt to access the capital markets, or curtail the
capital program. If drilling is curtailed or ended, future cash
flows could be materially negatively impacted.
38
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Results of Operations
Comparison of 2006 to 2005
Below is a comparison of our operations during 2006 with 2005.
Revenues and production. The following table illustrates
the primary components of revenues for 2006 and 2005, as well as
each years respective oil and natural gas production
volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and | |
|
|
per day amounts) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil wellhead
|
|
$ |
399,180 |
|
|
$ |
350,837 |
|
|
$ |
48,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil hedges
|
|
|
(52,206 |
) |
|
|
(42,878 |
) |
|
|
(9,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil revenues
|
|
$ |
346,974 |
|
|
$ |
307,959 |
|
|
$ |
39,015 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas wellhead
|
|
$ |
154,458 |
|
|
$ |
165,794 |
|
|
$ |
(11,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas hedges
|
|
|
(8,133 |
) |
|
|
(16,429 |
) |
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
146,325 |
|
|
$ |
149,365 |
|
|
$ |
(3,040 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined wellhead
|
|
$ |
553,638 |
|
|
$ |
516,631 |
|
|
$ |
37,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined hedges
|
|
|
(60,339 |
) |
|
|
(59,307 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total combined oil and natural gas revenues
|
|
|
493,299 |
|
|
|
457,324 |
|
|
|
35,975 |
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
Oil marketing revenues
|
|
|
147,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
640,862 |
|
|
$ |
457,324 |
|
|
$ |
183,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues ($/Unit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil wellhead
|
|
$ |
54.42 |
|
|
$ |
51.06 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil hedges
|
|
|
(7.12 |
) |
|
|
(6.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil revenues
|
|
$ |
47.30 |
|
|
$ |
44.82 |
|
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas wellhead
|
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
|
$ |
7.87 |
|
|
$ |
(1.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas hedges
|
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
6.24 |
|
|
$ |
7.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.85 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined wellhead
|
|
$ |
49.24 |
|
|
$ |
49.76 |
|
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Combined hedges
|
|
|
(5.37 |
) |
|
|
(5.71 |
) |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total combined oil and natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
43.87 |
|
|
$ |
44.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls)
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
23,456 |
|
|
|
21,059 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
Combined (BOE)
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
8% |
|
Daily production volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbl/ D)
|
|
|
20,096 |
|
|
|
18,826 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf/ D)
|
|
|
64,262 |
|
|
|
57,696 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
Combined (BOE/ D)
|
|
|
30,807 |
|
|
|
28,442 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
8% |
|
Average NYMEX prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
66.22 |
|
|
$ |
56.56 |
|
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
6.99 |
|
|
$ |
8.96 |
|
|
$ |
(1.97 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
)% |
39
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Oil revenues increased $39.0 million from
$308.0 million in 2005 to $347.0 million in 2006. The
increase is due primarily to higher realized average oil prices,
which contributed approximately $15.3 million in additional
oil revenues, and an increase in oil production volumes of
464 MBbls, which contributed approximately
$23.7 million in additional oil revenues. The increase in
production volumes is the result of our development program and
a full year of production on properties acquired during the
second half of 2005. The increase in revenues attributable to
higher realized average oil price consists of an increase
resulting from higher average wellhead oil price of
$24.7 million, or $3.36 per Bbl, partially offset by
an increased hedging charge of $9.3 million, or
$0.88 per Bbl. Our average oil wellhead price increased
$3.36 per Bbl in 2006 over 2005 as a result of increases in
the overall market price for oil as reflected in the increase in
the average NYMEX price from $56.56 in 2005 to $66.22 in 2006.
Please read the discussion below regarding the widening of our
oil wellhead price to average NYMEX price differential and its
related adverse impact on oil revenues for 2006.
Our oil wellhead revenue was reduced by $22.8 million and
$20.6 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, for the NPI
payments related to our CCA properties.
Natural gas revenues decreased $3.0 million from
$149.4 million in 2005 to $146.3 million in 2006. The
decrease is primarily due to lower realized average natural gas
prices, which reduced revenues by approximately
$21.9 million, partially offset by increased natural gas
production volumes of 2,397 MMcf, which contributed
approximately $18.9 million in additional natural gas
revenues. The decrease in revenues from lower realized average
natural gas prices consists of a decrease resulting from a lower
average wellhead natural gas price of $30.2 million,
$1.28 per Mcf, partially offset by a decreased hedging
charge of $8.3 million, or $0.43 per Mcf. Our average
natural gas wellhead price decreased $1.28 per Mcf in 2006
from 2005 due to a decrease in the overall market price of
natural gas as reflected in the decrease in the average NYMEX
price from $8.96 in 2005 to $6.99 in 2006.
The table below illustrates the relationship between oil and
natural gas wellhead prices as a percentage of average NYMEX
prices for 2006 and 2005. Management uses the wellhead to NYMEX
margin analysis to analyze trends in our oil and natural gas
revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Oil wellhead ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
54.42 |
|
|
$ |
51.06 |
|
Average NYMEX ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
66.22 |
|
|
$ |
56.56 |
|
|
Differential to NYMEX
|
|
$ |
(11.80 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.50 |
) |
|
Oil wellhead to NYMEX percentage
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
Natural gas wellhead ($/Mcf)
|
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
|
$ |
7.87 |
|
Average NYMEX ($/Mcf)
|
|
$ |
6.99 |
|
|
$ |
8.96 |
|
|
Differential to NYMEX
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
Natural gas wellhead to NYMEX percentage
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
In the first quarter of 2006, our oil wellhead price as a
percentage of the average NYMEX price percentage decreased to as
low as 65 percent. The widening of the differential was due
to market conditions in the Rocky Mountain refining area, which
has adversely affected the oil wellhead price we receive on our
CCA and Williston Basin production. Production increases from
competing Canadian and Rocky Mountain producers, in conjunction
with limited refining and pipeline capacity in the Rocky
Mountain area, created steep pricing discounts in the first
quarter of 2006. These discounts narrowed in the remainder of
2006, though they are still higher than our historical average.
The increase in the oil differential in 2006 as compared to 2005
adversely impacted oil revenues by $46.2 million. As Rocky
Mountain refiners have completed maintenance and increased their
demand for crude oil, our oil wellhead price as a percentage of
the average NYMEX price has improved from the first quarter of
2006, but still
40
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
remains wider than our historical average. We expect that our
oil wellhead differentials which averaged $10.06 per Bbl in
the fourth quarter of 2006 will improve slightly in the first
half of 2007.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, our natural gas wellhead price as
a percentage of the average NYMEX price percentage increased to
as high as 100 percent. This favorable variance is due to
our natural gas production in the North Louisiana Salt Basin and
Crockett County, Texas, which is sold at Katy, Houston Ship
Channel, and Henry Hub natural gas prices, which have recently
been higher than the average front-month NYMEX natural gas
price. The increase in the natural gas differential percentage
favorably impacted natural gas revenues by $16.2 million in
2006 as compared with 2005.
Marketing activities. In 2006, we began purchasing
third-party oil Bbls from a counterparty other than to whom the
Bbls were sold for aggregation and sale with our own equity
production. These purchases are conducted for strategic purposes
to assist us in marketing our production by decreasing our
dependence on individual markets. These activities allow us to
aggregate larger volumes, facilitate our efforts to maximize the
prices we receive for production, provide for a greater
allocation of future pipeline capacity in the event of
curtailments, and enable us to reach other markets.
The following table summarizes our oil marketing activities for
2006 (in thousands, except per BOE amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil marketing revenues
|
|
$ |
147,563 |
|
Oil marketing expenses
|
|
|
(148,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oil marketing, net
|
|
$ |
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Oil marketing revenues per BOE
|
|
$ |
13.12 |
|
Oil marketing expenses per BOE
|
|
|
(13.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oil marketing, net per BOE
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expenses. On January 1, 2006, we adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R), which requires that
companies recognize in their financial statements the cost of
employee services received in exchange for awards of equity
instruments based on the grant date fair value of those awards.
As a result, in 2006 we recognized expense associated with stock
options granted under our 2000 Incentive Stock Plan (the
Plan), which previously was only presented in pro
forma disclosures. Total non-cash stock-based compensation
expensed in 2006, consisting of expense associated with both
restricted stock and stock options, was $9.0 million. This
amount is not reported separately on the Consolidated Statements
of Operations but is allocated to LOE, exploration, and G&A
expense based on the allocation of employee payroll.
41
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
The following table summarizes our expenses for 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expenses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations
|
|
$ |
98,194 |
|
|
$ |
69,744 |
|
|
$ |
28,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
49,780 |
|
|
|
45,601 |
|
|
|
4,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production expenses
|
|
|
147,974 |
|
|
|
115,345 |
|
|
|
32,629 |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
113,463 |
|
|
|
85,627 |
|
|
|
27,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
30,519 |
|
|
|
14,443 |
|
|
|
16,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,194 |
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil marketing
|
|
|
148,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value (gain) loss
|
|
|
(24,388 |
) |
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
(29,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,477 |
|
|
|
(19,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
10,023 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
|
|
|
449,356 |
|
|
|
266,935 |
|
|
|
182,421 |
|
|
|
68% |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
45,131 |
|
|
|
34,055 |
|
|
|
11,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
55,406 |
|
|
|
53,948 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$ |
549,893 |
|
|
$ |
354,938 |
|
|
$ |
194,955 |
|
|
|
55% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses (per BOE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
$ |
6.72 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production expenses
|
|
|
13.16 |
|
|
|
11.11 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
18% |
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value (gain) loss
|
|
|
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
(2.68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
(1.88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
|
|
|
26.74 |
|
|
|
25.72 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$ |
35.68 |
|
|
$ |
34.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expenses. Total production expenses increased
$32.6 million from $115.3 million in 2005 to
$148.0 million in 2006. This increase resulted from an
increase in total production volumes, as well as a $2.05
increase in production expenses per BOE. Total production
expenses per BOE increased by 18 percent while total oil
and natural gas revenues per BOE remained virtually unchanged.
As a result of these changes, our production margin (defined as
oil and natural gas revenues less production expenses) for 2006
decreased seven percent to $30.71 per BOE as compared to
$32.94 per BOE for 2005.
42
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
The production expense attributable to LOE for 2006 increased
$28.5 million from $69.7 million in 2005 to
$98.2 million in 2006. The increase is due to higher
production volumes, which contributed approximately
$5.8 million of additional LOE, and an increase in the
average per BOE rate, which contributed approximately
$22.7 million of additional LOE. The increase in our
average LOE per BOE rate of $2.01 was attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in prices paid to oilfield service companies and
suppliers due to a current higher price environment; |
|
|
|
increased operational activity to maximize production; |
|
|
|
the operation of higher operating cost wells (which have offered
acceptable rates of return due to increases in oil and natural
gas prices); |
|
|
|
higher than expected operating costs in the Anadarko Basin and
Arkoma Basin of Oklahoma and the North Louisiana Salt Basin; |
|
|
|
higher salary levels for engineers and other technical
professionals; |
|
|
|
expensing HPAI costs associated with the Little Beaver
Phase 2 program; and |
|
|
|
increased stock-based compensation expense attributable to
equity instruments granted to employees under the Plan. |
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, non-cash stock-based
compensation expense was separately reported on the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Due to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, non-cash stock-based compensation expense in all
prior periods presented has been reclassified to allocate the
amount to the same respective income statement lines as the
employees salary, cash bonus, and benefits. As all
full-time employees, including field personnel, are eligible for
equity grants under the Plan, LOE, G&A expense, and
exploration expense have been changed to reflect the new
presentation. This change has resulted in additional LOE of
$2.4 million in 2006, or $0.22 per BOE, as compared to
$1.3 million in 2005, or $0.13 per BOE. The increase
in non-cash stock-based compensation expense allocated to LOE is
primarily due to new stock-based compensation awards granted to
employees in 2006 and expensing of stock options beginning
January 1, 2006 in accordance with SFAS 123R.
The production expense attributable to production, ad valorem,
and severance taxes (production taxes) increased
$4.2 million from $45.6 million in 2005 to
$49.8 million in 2006. The increase is due to higher
production volumes, which contributed approximately
$3.8 million of additional production taxes. As a
percentage of oil and natural gas revenues (excluding the
effects of hedges), production taxes remained constant at
approximately nine percent in 2006 and 2005. The effect of
hedges is excluded from oil and natural gas revenues in the
calculation of these percentages because this method more
closely reflects the method used to calculate actual production
taxes paid to taxing authorities.
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
(DD&A) expense. DD&A expense increased
$27.8 million from $85.6 million in 2005 to
$113.5 million in 2006 due to a higher per BOE rate and
increased production volumes. The per BOE rate in 2006 increased
$1.84 as compared to 2005 due to development of previously
undeveloped reserves and higher finding, development, and
acquisition costs. The higher finding, development, and
acquisition costs were a result of increases in rig rates,
oilfield services costs, and acquisition costs. These factors
resulted in additional DD&A expense of approximately
$20.7 million. The increase in production volumes resulted
in approximately $7.1 million of additional DD&A
expense.
Exploration expense. Exploration expense increased
$16.1 million in 2006 as compared to 2005. During 2006, we
expensed 14 exploratory dry holes totaling
$17.3 million. Of the 14 exploratory dry holes
expensed, seven were drilled in the Mid-Continent, six were
drilled in the CCA, and one was drilled in the Permian Basin.
During 2005, we expensed 47 exploratory dry holes totaling
$8.6 million. Of the 47 exploratory dry holes
expensed, 45 were drilled in the shallow gas area of Montana,
one was drilled in
43
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
the Permian Basin, and one was drilled in the CCA. In addition,
impairment of unproved acreage in 2006 increased
$8.8 million as we added $24.5 million in additional
leasehold costs, expanded our exploratory drilling efforts, and
wrote down the cost of unproved acreage in the shallow gas area
of Montana by $4.5 million based on drilling results in the
area. The following table details our exploration-related
expenses for 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Dry holes
|
|
$ |
17,257 |
|
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
$ |
8,625 |
|
Geological and seismic
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
Delay rentals
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Impairment of unproved acreage
|
|
|
10,872 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
8,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
30,519 |
|
|
$ |
14,443 |
|
|
$ |
16,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the current commodity price environment, we believe
exploration programs can provide a rate of return comparable to
property acquisitions in certain areas. We seek to acquire
undeveloped acreage and/or enter into drilling arrangements to
explore in areas that complement our portfolio of properties. In
keeping with our exploitation focus, the exploration projects
expand existing fields or could set up multi-well exploitation
projects if successful.
G&A expense. G&A expense increased
$5.9 million from $17.3 million in 2005 to
$23.2 million in 2006. The overall increase, as well as the
$0.39 increase in the per BOE rate, is primarily the result of
increased stock-based compensation expense attributable to
equity instruments granted to employees under the Plan.
The previously discussed adoption of SFAS 123R and change
in presentation of non-cash stock-based compensation expense
resulted in additional G&A expense of $6.5 million in
2006, or $0.58 per BOE, as compared to $2.6 million in
2005, or $0.25 per BOE. The increase in non-cash
stock-based compensation expense allocated to G&A expense is
primarily due to new stock-based compensation awards granted to
employees in 2006 and expensing of stock options beginning
January 1, 2006 in accordance with SFAS 123R.
As of December 31, 2006, we had $10.5 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested, outstanding
restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.8 years. Additionally, we had
$1.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options as of December 31, 2006,
which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.6 years.
Derivative fair value (gain) loss. To increase
clarity in our financial statements by accounting for all
contracts under the same method, we elected to discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively for all of our remaining commodity
derivatives beginning in July 2006. While this change has no
effect on our cash flows, results of operations are affected by
mark-to-market gains
and losses, which fluctuate with the swings in oil and natural
gas prices.
44
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
During 2006, we recorded a $24.4 million derivative fair
value gain as compared to a $5.3 million loss recorded in
2005. The components of the derivative fair value
(gain) loss reported in 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Designated cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffectiveness Derivative commodity contracts
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
$ |
8,371 |
|
|
$ |
(6,623 |
) |
Undesignated derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market loss (gain):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
(17,279 |
) |
|
|
(2,050 |
) |
|
|
(15,229 |
) |
|
Settlements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
(7,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value (gain) loss
|
|
$ |
(24,388 |
) |
|
$ |
5,290 |
|
|
$ |
(29,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt. In 2005, we recorded a
one-time $19.5 million loss on early redemption of debt
related to the redemption premium and the expensing of
unamortized debt issuance costs of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes (the
83/8% Notes).
We redeemed all $150 million of the
83/8 Notes
with proceeds received from the issuance of our
$300 million of 6% Senior Subordinated Notes (the
6% Notes).
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$11.1 million in 2006 as compared to 2005. The increase is
primarily due to additional debt used to finance acquisitions
and our capital program. We issued $150 million of
71/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes (the
71/4% Notes)
in November 2005, $300 million of 6% Notes in July
2005, and $150 million of
61/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes (the
61/4% Notes)
in April 2004. We also redeemed all $150 million of
83/8% Notes
in August 2005. The weighted average interest rate for all
long-term indebtedness, net of hedges, for 2006 was
6.1 percent as compared to 6.8 percent for 2005.
The following table illustrates the components of interest
expense for 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
83/8% Notes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,852 |
|
|
$ |
(7,852 |
) |
61/4% Notes
|
|
|
9,684 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
6% Notes
|
|
|
18,418 |
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
|
|
9,981 |
|
71/4% Notes
|
|
|
10,984 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
9,839 |
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
(945 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
45,131 |
|
|
$ |
34,055 |
|
|
$ |
11,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes. Income tax expense for 2006 increased
$1.5 million over 2005. This is due to higher pre-tax
income and an increase in our effective tax rate. Our effective
tax rate increased in 2006 to 37.5 percent from
34.3 percent in 2005 due to the absence of Section 43
income tax credits during 2006 and changes to the Texas
franchise tax. The Enhanced Oil Recovery credits available under
Section 43 are
45
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
fully phased out for the 2006 tax year due to high oil prices in
2005. Therefore, no credits were generated during 2006. We were
able to reduce our income tax provision in 2005 by
$3.2 million by using Section 43 credits. In addition,
a recently enacted Texas franchise tax reform measure caused us
to adjust our net deferred tax balances using the new higher
marginal tax rate we expect to be effective when those deferred
taxes become current. This resulted in a charge of
$1.1 million during 2006. The Texas margin tax was offset
by an overall reduction in the income tax rate of states other
than Texas due to higher sales in low or no tax states.
Comparison of 2005 to 2004
Below is a comparison of our operations for 2005 with 2004.
Revenues and production. The following table illustrates
the primary components of oil and natural gas revenues for 2005
and 2004, as well as each years respective oil and natural
gas volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and | |
|
|
|
|
per day amounts) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil wellhead
|
|
$ |
350,837 |
|
|
$ |
255,394 |
|
|
$ |
95,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil hedges
|
|
|
(42,878 |
) |
|
|
(34,745 |
) |
|
|
(8,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil revenues
|
|
$ |
307,959 |
|
|
$ |
220,649 |
|
|
$ |
87,310 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas wellhead
|
|
$ |
165,794 |
|
|
$ |
81,112 |
|
|
$ |
84,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas hedges
|
|
|
(16,429 |
) |
|
|
(3,228 |
) |
|
|
(13,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
149,365 |
|
|
$ |
77,884 |
|
|
$ |
71,481 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined wellhead
|
|
$ |
516,631 |
|
|
$ |
336,506 |
|
|
$ |
180,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined hedges
|
|
|
(59,307 |
) |
|
|
(37,973 |
) |
|
|
(21,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total combined oil and natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
457,324 |
|
|
$ |
298,533 |
|
|
$ |
158,791 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues ($/Unit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil wellhead
|
|
$ |
51.06 |
|
|
$ |
38.24 |
|
|
$ |
12.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil hedges
|
|
|
(6.24 |
) |
|
|
(5.20 |
) |
|
|
(1.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil revenues
|
|
$ |
44.82 |
|
|
$ |
33.04 |
|
|
$ |
11.78 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas wellhead
|
|
$ |
7.87 |
|
|
$ |
5.76 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas hedges
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
7.09 |
|
|
$ |
5.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined wellhead
|
|
$ |
49.76 |
|
|
$ |
37.28 |
|
|
$ |
12.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined hedges
|
|
|
(5.71 |
) |
|
|
(4.21 |
) |
|
|
(1.50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total combined oil and natural gas revenues
|
|
$ |
44.05 |
|
|
$ |
33.07 |
|
|
$ |
10.98 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and | |
|
|
|
|
per day amounts) | |
|
|
Total production volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls)
|
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
|
6,679 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
21,059 |
|
|
|
14,089 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
Combined (BOE)
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
9,027 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Daily production volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbl/ D)
|
|
|
18,826 |
|
|
|
18,249 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Natural gas (Mcf/ D)
|
|
|
57,696 |
|
|
|
38,493 |
|
|
|
19,203 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Combined (BOE/ D)
|
|
|
28,442 |
|
|
|
24,665 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Average NYMEX prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
56.56 |
|
|
$ |
41.26 |
|
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
8.96 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
|
|
$ |
2.85 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Oil revenues increased $87.3 million from
$220.6 million in 2004 to $308.0 million in 2005. The
increase is due primarily to higher realized average oil prices,
which contributed approximately $80.0 million in additional
oil revenues, and an increase in oil production volumes of
192 MBbls, which contributed approximately
$7.3 million in additional oil revenues. The
$80.0 million increase in oil revenues from higher realized
average oil prices consists of an $88.1 million increase
resulting from higher average oil wellhead prices, offset by
increased hedging payments of $8.1 million, or
$1.04 per Bbl. Our average oil wellhead price increased
$12.82 per Bbl in 2005 over 2004 as a result of increases
in the overall market price for oil, which is reflected in the
increase in the average NYMEX price from $41.26 per Bbl in
2004 to $56.56 per Bbl in 2005.
Our oil wellhead revenue was reduced by $20.6 million and
$12.3 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, for the NPI
payments related to our CCA properties.
Natural gas revenues increased $71.5 million from
$77.9 million in 2004 to $149.4 million in 2005. The
increase is due primarily to increased natural gas production
volumes of 6,970 MMcf, which contributed approximately
$40.1 million in additional natural gas revenues, and
higher realized average natural gas prices, which contributed
approximately $31.4 million in additional natural gas
revenues. The $31.4 million increase in natural gas
revenues from higher realized average natural gas prices
consists of a $44.6 million increase resulting from higher
average natural gas wellhead prices, offset by increased hedging
payments of $13.2 million, or $0.55 per Mcf. Our
average natural gas wellhead price increased $2.11 per Mcf
in 2005 over 2004 due to an increase in the overall market price
of natural gas, which is reflected in the increase in the
average NYMEX price from $6.11 in 2004 to $8.96 in 2005.
47
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
The table below illustrates the relationship between oil and
natural gas wellhead prices as a percentage of average NYMEX
prices for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Management uses the wellhead to NYMEX margin analysis to analyze
trends in our oil and natural gas revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Oil wellhead ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
51.06 |
|
|
$ |
38.24 |
|
Average NYMEX ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
56.56 |
|
|
$ |
41.26 |
|
|
Differential to NYMEX
|
|
$ |
(5.50 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.02 |
) |
|
Oil wellhead to NYMEX percentage
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
Natural gas wellhead ($/Mcf)
|
|
$ |
7.87 |
|
|
$ |
5.76 |
|
Average NYMEX ($/Mcf)
|
|
$ |
8.96 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
|
|
Differential to NYMEX
|
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
|
Natural gas wellhead to NYMEX percentage
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
In the fourth quarter of 2005, the oil wellhead to NYMEX price
percentage decreased to as low as 88 percent. In the fourth
quarter of 2005, the natural gas wellhead to NYMEX price
percentage decreased to as low as 75 percent due to
pipeline capacity constraints.
Expenses. The following table summarizes our expenses for
2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expenses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations
|
|
$ |
69,744 |
|
|
$ |
47,807 |
|
|
$ |
21,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
45,601 |
|
|
|
30,313 |
|
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production expenses
|
|
|
115,345 |
|
|
|
78,120 |
|
|
|
37,225 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
85,627 |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
|
|
37,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
14,443 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
10,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
12,059 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value loss
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt
|
|
|
19,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
4,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
|
|
|
266,935 |
|
|
|
152,675 |
|
|
|
114,260 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
Interest
|
|
|
34,055 |
|
|
|
23,459 |
|
|
|
10,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
53,948 |
|
|
|
40,492 |
|
|
|
13,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$ |
354,938 |
|
|
$ |
216,626 |
|
|
$ |
138,312 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expenses (per BOE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations
|
|
$ |
6.72 |
|
|
$ |
5.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production expenses
|
|
|
11.11 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value loss
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
|
|
|
25.72 |
|
|
|
16.93 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
Interest
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$ |
34.20 |
|
|
$ |
24.02 |
|
|
$ |
10.18 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expenses. Total production expenses increased
$37.2 million from $78.1 million in 2004 to
$115.3 million in 2005 primarily due to an increase in
total production volumes, as well as a $2.45 increase in
production expenses per BOE. The 28 percent increase in
total production expenses per BOE compares to a 33 percent
increase in revenues per BOE due to a higher production margin
(defined as revenues less production expenses) in 2005 as
compared to 2004.
The production expense attributable to LOE for 2005 increased as
compared to 2004 by $21.9 million due to an increase in
production volumes and an increase in the average per BOE rate.
The increase in production volumes was a result of our 2005
drilling program, the 2005 and 2004 acquisitions, and our
secondary and tertiary recovery programs, including the
waterflood enhancement program and the HPAI program. These
increased volumes resulted in approximately $7.2 million of
additional LOE. The increase in our average expense per BOE was
attributable to increases in prices paid to oilfield service
companies and suppliers due to a higher price environment,
increased operational activity to maximize production, and the
operation of higher operating cost wells, which became more
attractive due to increases in oil and natural gas prices. This
increased average per BOE rate resulted in approximately
$14.8 million of additional LOE for price escalation for
services. The previously discussed change in presentation of
non-cash stock-based compensation expense resulted in additional
LOE of $1.3 million in 2005, or $0.13 per BOE, as
compared to $0.7 million in 2004, or $0.07 per BOE.
The increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense
allocated to LOE is primarily due to new stock-based
compensation awards granted to employees in 2005.
The production expense attributable to production taxes for 2005
increased as compared to 2004 by $15.3 million due to an
increase in production volumes and an increase in the average
wellhead price we received for oil and natural gas production.
The increase in production volumes over 2004 resulted in
approximately $4.5 million of additional production taxes.
The average wellhead price we received for oil and natural gas
revenues increased $12.48 per BOE, resulting in additional
production taxes of approximately $10.8 million in 2005. As
a percentage of oil and natural gas revenues (excluding the
effect of hedges), production taxes for 2005 decreased slightly
from 9.0 percent for 2004 to 8.8 percent for 2005. The
effect of hedges is excluded from oil and natural gas revenues
in the calculation of these percentages
49
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
because this method more closely reflects the method used to
calculate actual production taxes paid to taxing authorities.
DD&A expense. DD&A expense increased
$37.1 million from $48.5 million in 2004 to
$85.6 million in 2005 due to a higher per BOE rate and
increased production volumes. The per BOE rate in 2005 increased
$2.87 as compared to 2004 due to the development of proved
undeveloped reserves from the 2004 acquisitions, which do not
increase total proved reserves, and higher drilling costs per
BOE of reserves than our historical DD&A rate in certain
areas. These factors resulted in additional DD&A expense of
$29.8 million. The increase in production volumes of
1,354 MBOE over 2004 resulted in $7.3 million of
additional DD&A expense.
Exploration expense. Exploration expense increased
$10.5 million in 2005 as compared to 2004. During 2005, we
expensed 47 exploratory dry holes totaling $8.6 million. Of
the 47 exploratory dry holes expensed, 45 were drilled in the
shallow gas area of Montana, one was drilled in the Permian
Basin, and one was drilled in the CCA. In 2004, we expensed four
exploratory dry holes at a cost of $2.0 million. In 2004,
three of the exploratory dry holes were drilled in our Montana
shallow gas area and one was drilled in the Barnett Shale in our
Mid-Continent area. The following table details our
exploration-related expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Dry holes
|
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
$ |
2,050 |
|
|
$ |
6,582 |
|
Geological and seismic
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
Delay rentals
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Impairment of unproved acreage
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
14,443 |
|
|
$ |
3,935 |
|
|
$ |
10,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G&A expense. G&A expense increased
$5.2 million from $12.1 million in 2004 to
$17.3 million in 2005. The overall increase, as well as the
$0.34 increase in the per BOE rate, is a result of increased
staffing to manage our larger asset base, higher activity
levels, and increased personnel costs due to intense competition
for human resources within the industry.
The previously discussed change in presentation of non-cash
stock-based compensation expense resulted in additional G&A
expense of $2.6 million in 2005, or $0.25 per BOE, as
compared to $1.1 million in 2004, or $0.12 per BOE.
The increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense
allocated to G&A expense is primarily due to new stock-based
compensation awards granted to employees in 2005.
Derivative fair value loss. During 2005, we recorded a
$5.3 million derivative fair value loss as compared to
$5.0 million in 2004. This derivative fair value loss
represents the ineffective portion of the
mark-to-market loss on
our derivative hedging instruments, settlements received on
fixed-to-floating
interest rate swaps, losses (gains) related to commodity
derivatives not designated as hedges, and changes
50
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
in the mark-to-market
value of
fixed-to-floating
interest rate swaps. The components of the derivative fair value
loss reported in 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Designated cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffectiveness Commodity contracts
|
|
$ |
8,371 |
|
|
$ |
5,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,353 |
|
Undesignated derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market loss Interest rate swap
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market gain Commodity contracts
|
|
|
(3,231 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(2,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value loss
|
|
$ |
5,290 |
|
|
$ |
5,011 |
|
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffectiveness loss related to our derivative commodity
contracts designated as hedges increased $3.4 million in
2005 as compared to 2004 due primarily to an increase in oil
wellhead differentials on our production in the CCA. The
interest rate swap loss in 2005 decreased as compared to 2004
due to the expiration of our
fixed-to-floating
interest rate swap in June 2005. The ineffectiveness loss is
offset by a $3.2 million gain related to undesignated
commodity contracts, which increased due to changes in the fair
value of certain natural gas basis swaps.
Loss on early redemption of debt. In 2005, we recorded a
one-time $19.5 million loss on early redemption of debt
related to the redemption premium and the write-off of
unamortized debt issuance costs of our
83/8% Notes.
We redeemed all $150 million of the
83/8% Notes
with proceeds received from the issuance of our
$300 million 6% Notes in July 2005.
Other operating expense. Other operating expense
increased $4.5 million from $5.0 million in 2004 to
$9.5 million in 2005. This increase is mainly due to an
increase in natural gas transportation costs attributable to
higher production volumes for 2005 as compared to 2004.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$10.6 million in 2005 as compared to 2004. The increase is
primarily due to additional debt used to finance acquisitions
and our capital program. We issued $150 million of
71/4% Notes
in November 2005, $300 million of 6% Notes in July
2005, and $150 million of
61/4% Notes
in April 2004. We also redeemed $150 million of
83/8% Notes
in August 2005. The weighted average interest rate, net of
hedges, for 2005 was 6.8 percent as compared to
7.7 percent for 2004. This lower weighted average interest
rate is the result of the debt issuances which have rates lower
than our historical average rate.
The following table illustrates the components of interest
expense for 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
83/8% Notes
|
|
$ |
7,852 |
|
|
$ |
12,563 |
|
|
$ |
(4,711 |
) |
61/4% Notes
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
6% Notes
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
71/4% Notes
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
34,055 |
|
|
$ |
23,459 |
|
|
$ |
10,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Income taxes. Income tax expense for 2005 increased
$13.5 million from 2004. This increase is due primarily to
an increase of $34.7 million in income before income taxes.
Our effective tax rate increased slightly in 2005 to
34.3 percent from 33.0 percent in 2004.
Our primary capital resources are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities; |
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities; and |
|
|
|
Current capitalization. |
Cash flows from operating activities. Cash provided by
operating activities increased $5.1 million from
$292.3 million in 2005 to $297.3 million in 2006.
Total oil and natural gas revenues in 2006 increased
$36.0 million, or eight percent, from 2005, which was
offset by an increase of $33.9 million, or 13 percent,
in total operating expenses (excluding oil marketing expenses)
in 2006 from 2005, which resulted in a $5.1 million
increase in cash provided by operating activities.
For 2005 as compared to 2004, cash provided by operating
activities increased $120.5 million from
$171.8 million in 2004 to $292.3 million in 2005. This
increase resulted mainly from an increase in revenues which
outpaced the increase in total operating expenses. Revenues
increased in 2005 as both production volumes and commodity
prices were higher than in 2004. Our production volumes
increased 1,354 MBOE from 9,027 MBOE in 2004 to
10,381 MBOE in 2005. Our average realized oil price
increased $11.78 per Bbl from $33.04 per Bbl in 2004
to $44.82 in 2005. Our average realized natural gas price
increased $1.56 per Mcf from $5.53 in 2004 to
$7.09 per Mcf in 2005. Total operating expenses increased
$114.3 million from $152.7 million in 2004 to
$266.9 million in 2005.
Cash flows from investing activities. Cash used in
investing activities decreased $176.1 million from
$573.6 million in 2005 to $397.4 million in 2006. The
decrease was primarily due to a $124.5 million decrease in
amounts paid for the acquisition of oil and natural gas
properties. Also, in 2005, we purchased all of the outstanding
capital stock of Crusader, a privately held, independent oil and
natural gas company, for a purchase price of approximately
$109.6 million. During 2006, we advanced $22.4 million
to ExxonMobil for their portion of costs incurred drilling the
commitment wells under the joint development agreement.
For 2005 as compared to 2004, cash used in operating activities
increased $140.1 million from $433.5 million in 2004
to $573.6 million in 2005. This increase was primarily due
to a $135.4 million increase in costs incurred for the
development of oil and natural gas properties. In 2004, we
purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of Cortez, a
privately held, independent oil and natural gas company, for a
total purchase price of $127.0 million.
Cash flows from financing activities. Our cash flows from
financing activities consist primarily of proceeds from and
payments on long-term debt and net proceeds from the sale of
additional common stock. During 2006, we received net cash of
$99.2 million from financing activities.
On April 4, 2006, we received net proceeds of
$127.1 million from a public offering of 4.0 million
shares of our common stock. The net proceeds, after underwriting
discounts and commissions and other expenses, were used to repay
outstanding balances under our revolving credit facility, invest
in oil and natural gas activities, and to pay general corporate
expenses.
We periodically draw on our revolving credit facility to fund
acquisitions and other capital commitments. Historically, we
have repaid large balances on our revolving credit facility with
proceeds from the issuance of senior subordinated notes in order
to extend the maturity date of the debt and fix the interest
rate. Our total borrowings less repayments on our revolving
credit facility, as described above,
52
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
resulted in a net decrease in outstanding borrowings under our
revolving credit facility of $12 million from
$80 million at December 31, 2005 to $68 million
at December 31, 2006.
During 2005, we received net cash of $281.8 million from
financing activities. In July 2005, we issued $300 million
of 6% Notes and received net proceeds of approximately
$294.5 million. In November 2005, we issued
$150 million of
71/4% Notes
and received net proceeds of approximately $148.5 million.
We used approximately $165.9 million of the net proceeds to
(i) redeem all of our outstanding
83/8% Notes,
(ii) pay the related early redemption premiums, and
(iii) reduce outstanding borrowings under our revolving
credit facility.
During 2004, we received net cash of $262.3 million from
financing activities. On April 2, 2004, we issued
$150 million of
61/4% Notes
and received net proceeds of approximately $146.4 million.
On June 10, 2004, we sold 3.0 million shares of our
common stock to the public at a price of $17.97 per share.
The net proceeds of the common stock offering, after
underwriting discounts and commissions and other expenses, were
approximately $52.9 million. We used the net proceeds of
the debt issuance and common stock offering to fund the 2004
acquisition of Cortez, repay indebtedness under our revolving
credit facility, and for general corporate purposes.
Current capitalization. At December 31, 2006, we had
total assets of $2.0 billion. Total capitalization as of
December 31, 2006 was $1.5 billion, of which
55 percent was represented by stockholders equity and
45 percent by long-term debt. At December 31, 2005, we
had total assets of $1.7 billion. Total capitalization as
of December 31, 2005 was $1.2 billion, of which
45 percent was represented by stockholders equity and
55 percent by long-term debt. The percentages of our
capitalization represented by stockholders equity and
long-term debt could vary in the future if debt is used to
finance future capital projects or potential acquisitions.
Our primary needs for cash are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Development, exploitation, and exploration of our existing oil
and natural gas properties; |
|
|
|
Acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties and leasehold
acreage; |
|
|
|
Other general property and equipment; |
|
|
|
Funding of necessary working capital; and |
|
|
|
Payment of contractual obligations. |
Development, exploitation, and exploration of existing
properties. The following table summarizes our costs
incurred (excluding asset retirement obligations) related to
development, exploitation, and exploration activities during
2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Development and exploitation
|
|
$ |
228,014 |
|
|
$ |
236,467 |
|
|
$ |
117,464 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
95,205 |
|
|
|
57,046 |
|
|
|
30,546 |
|
HPAI
|
|
|
25,470 |
|
|
|
32,053 |
|
|
|
39,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
348,689 |
|
|
$ |
325,566 |
|
|
$ |
187,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and exploitation. Our expenditures for
development and exploitation activities primarily relate to
drilling development and infill wells, workovers of existing
wells, and field related facilities. Our development and
exploitation capital for 2006 included a total of 182 gross
(72.3 net) successful wells and 4 gross (2.5 net)
developmental dry holes.
53
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
We currently have 13 operated rigs drilling on the onshore
continental United States with 3 rigs in the CCA, 2 rigs in
Oklahoma, 1 rig in North Texas, and 7 rigs in West Texas.
Exploration. Our expenditures for exploration investments
primarily relate to drilling exploratory wells, seismic costs,
delay rentals, and geological and geophysical costs. During
2006, our exploration capital was invested primarily in drilling
extension wells in the Mid-Continent area. In 2006, our
exploration capital yielded 71 gross (19.3 net)
successful wells and 14 gross (7.6 net) exploratory
dry holes.
HPAI programs. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company
invested $25.5 million, $32.1 million, and
$39.6 million on implementation of the HPAI programs in the
Pennel, Coral Creek, and Little Beaver units of the CCA.
Acquisitions of proved property and leasehold acreage.
The following table summarizes our costs incurred (excluding
asset retirement obligations) for oil and natural gas property
acquisitions during 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Acquisitions of proved property
|
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
$ |
224,469 |
|
|
$ |
204,907 |
|
Acquisitions of leasehold acreage
|
|
|
24,462 |
|
|
|
21,205 |
|
|
|
33,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
28,948 |
|
|
$ |
245,674 |
|
|
$ |
238,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Acquisitions. We invested $4.5 million during
2006 in additional working interests spread over our various
core areas.
2005 Acquisitions. On October 14, 2005, we completed
the acquisition of Crusader for a purchase price of
approximately $109.6 million, which includes acquired
working capital. The acquired properties are located primarily
in the western Anadarko Basin and the Golden Trend area of
Oklahoma. On November 30, 2005, we acquired oil and natural
gas properties from Kerr-McGee Corporation for a purchase price
of approximately $101.4 million. The acquired properties
are located in the Levelland-Slaughter, Howard Glasscock,
Nolley-McFarland, and Hutex fields in west Texas and the
Oakdale, Calumet, and Rush Springs fields in western Oklahoma.
On September 8, 2005, we acquired oil and natural gas
properties in the Williston Basin for a purchase price of
approximately $28.6 million. In addition to these
acquisitions, we invested approximately $12.2 million
during 2005 to acquire additional working interests in various
areas.
2004 Acquisitions. On April 14, 2004, we completed
the acquisition of Cortez for a purchase price of approximately
$127.0 million. The acquired properties are located in the
CCA of Montana, the Permian Basin of west Texas and southeastern
New Mexico, and in the Mid-Continent area. On June 17,
2004, we completed the acquisition of natural gas producing
properties and undeveloped leases in the Overton Field located
in Smith County, Texas for $83.1 million.
Leasehold acreage costs. Our capital expenditures for
leasehold acreage costs during 2006, 2005, and 2004 totaled
$24.5 million, $21.2 million, and $33.9 million,
respectively. Leasehold costs incurred in 2006 related to the
acquisition of unproved acreage in various areas. Leasehold
costs incurred in 2005 consist primarily of $14.3 million
to acquire undeveloped leasehold costs in various areas and
$6.9 million to acquire leases in the Crusader acquisition.
Leasehold costs incurred in 2004 relate primarily to the Cortez,
Overton, and Montana shallow gas acreage acquisitions. Of the
$33.9 million of capital expenditures for unproved property
in 2004, $3.0 million and $18.4 million relate to the
Cortez and Overton acquisitions, respectively, $7.9 million
relates to leases acquired in our Montana shallow gas area, and
the remaining $4.6 million relates to the acquisition of
unproved acreage in various areas.
54
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Other general property and equipment. Our capital
expenditures for other general property and equipment during
2006, 2005, and 2004 totaled $4.3 million,
$6.8 million, and $7.6 million, respectively. Capital
expenditures for other general property and equipment include
aircraft, corporate leasehold improvements, computers, and
various field equipment.
Funding of necessary working capital. At
December 31, 2006, our working capital (defined as total
current assets less total current liabilities) was negative
$40.7 million while at December 31, 2005, our working
capital was negative $56.8 million, an improvement of
$16.1 million. At December 31, 2004, our working
capital was negative $15.6 million. The improvement in 2006
is primarily attributable to decreases in the NYMEX price of
natural gas, which favorably impacted the fair value of
outstanding derivative contracts, net of deferred taxes, offset
by the decrease in accounts receivable from sales of natural gas
resulting from the lower price. The deterioration in 2005 was
primarily attributable to changes in the fair value of
outstanding derivative contracts, net of the deferred tax effect
of marking these contracts to market.
For 2007, we expect working capital to remain negative. Negative
working capital is expected mainly due to fair values of our
derivative contracts, the settlements of which will be offset by
cash flows from the hedged production, and deferred hedge
premiums. We anticipate cash reserves to be close to zero
because we intend to use any excess cash to fund capital
obligations and pay down any outstanding borrowings under our
revolving credit facility. We do not plan to pay cash dividends
in the foreseeable future. The overall 2007 commodity prices and
our related differentials for oil and natural gas will be the
largest variables affecting working capital. Our operating cash
flow is determined in large part by commodity prices. Assuming
moderate to high commodity prices, our operating cash flow
should remain positive in 2007.
The Board has approved a capital budget of approximately
$285 million for 2007. The level of these and other future
expenditures is largely discretionary, and the amount of funds
devoted to any particular activity may increase or decrease
significantly, depending on available opportunities, timing of
projects, and market conditions. We plan to finance our ongoing
expenditures using internally generated cash flow, cash on hand,
and borrowings under our existing revolving credit agreement.
Contractual obligations. The following table illustrates
our contractual obligations and commercial commitments
outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
Contractual Obligations and Commitments |
|
Total | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008-2009 | |
|
2010-2011 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
61/4% Notes(a)
|
|
$ |
220,313 |
|
|
$ |
9,375 |
|
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
|
$ |
173,438 |
|
6% Notes(a)
|
|
|
462,000 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
71/4% Notes(a)
|
|
|
269,625 |
|
|
|
10,875 |
|
|
|
21,750 |
|
|
|
21,750 |
|
|
|
215,250 |
|
Revolving credit facility(a)
|
|
|
80,212 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
6,106 |
|
|
|
71,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative obligations(b)
|
|
|
77,524 |
|
|
|
53,804 |
|
|
|
22,880 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Development commitments(c)
|
|
|
199,092 |
|
|
|
135,779 |
|
|
|
62,942 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases(d)
|
|
|
14,218 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
Asset retirement obligations(e)
|
|
|
134,103 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
130,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,457,087 |
|
|
$ |
233,340 |
|
|
$ |
174,005 |
|
|
$ |
154,236 |
|
|
$ |
895,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Amounts included in the table above include both principal and
projected interest payments. Please read Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional
information regarding our long-term debt. |
55
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
(b) |
Derivative obligations represent net liabilities for derivatives
that were valued as of December 31, 2006. With the
exception of $54.7 million of deferred premiums on
derivative contracts, the ultimate settlement amounts of the
remaining portions of our derivative obligations are unknown
because they are subject to continuing market risk. Please read
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk and Note 13 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional
information regarding our derivative obligations. |
|
(c) |
Development commitments include authorized purchases for work in
process of $46.7 million which is accrued at
December 31, 2006, future minimum payments for electricity,
seismic data analysis, and drilling rig operations of
$140.4 million, and $12.0 million for minimum capital
obligations associated with the remaining commitment wells to be
drilled under the ExxonMobil joint development agreement. Also
at December 31, 2006, we had $132.3 million of
authorized purchases not placed to vendors (authorized AFEs),
which were not accrued and are excluded from the above table but
are budgeted for and expected to be made unless circumstances
change. |
|
(d) |
Operating leases represent office space and equipment
obligations that have non-cancelable lease terms in excess of
one year. Please read Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data for additional
information regarding our operating leases. |
|
(e) |
Asset retirement obligations represent the undiscounted future
plugging and abandonment expenses on oil and natural gas
properties and related facilities disposal at the completion of
field life. Please read Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data for additional
information regarding our AROs. |
Other contingencies and commitments. In order to
facilitate ongoing sales of our oil production in the CCA, we
ship a portion of our production in pipelines downstream and
sell to purchasers at major U.S. market hubs. From time to
time, shipping delays, purchaser stipulations, or other
conditions may require that we sell our oil production in
periods subsequent to the period in which it is produced. In
such case, the deferred sale would have an adverse effect in the
period of production on reported production volumes, oil and
natural gas revenues, and costs as measured on a
unit-of-production
basis.
The marketing of our CCA oil production is mainly dependent on
transportation through the Bridger, Poplar, and Butte pipelines
to markets in the Guernsey, Wyoming area. Recently, alternative
transportation routes and markets have been developed by moving
a portion of the crude oil production through Enbridge to the
Clearbrook, Minnesota hub. In addition, new markets to the west
have been identified and a portion of our crude oil is being
moved that direction through the Rocky Mountain Pipeline. To a
lesser extent, our production also depends on transportation
through Platte Pipeline to Wood River, Illinois as well as other
pipelines connected to the Guernsey, Wyoming area. While
shipments on Platte Pipeline are currently oversubscribed and
subject to apportionment since December 2005, we were allocated
transportation effective January 1, 2007. However, further
restrictions on available capacity to transport oil through any
of the above mentioned pipelines, or any other pipelines, or any
refinery upsets could have a material adverse effect on our
production volumes and the prices we receive for our production.
We expect the differential between the NYMEX price of crude oil
and the wellhead price we receive to slightly improve in the
first half of 2007 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2006. In
recent years, production increases from competing Canadian and
Rocky Mountain producers, in conjunction with limited refining
and pipeline capacity from the Rocky Mountain area, have
gradually widened this differential. We cannot accurately
predict crude oil differentials. Natural gas differentials are
expected to remain approximately constant in the first half of
2007 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2006. Increases in the
differential between the NYMEX price for oil and natural gas and
the wellhead price we receive could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial position, and
cash flows.
56
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Letters of credit. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$21.1 million of outstanding letters of credit,
$20.0 million of which relates to the ExxonMobil joint
development agreement. As of February 20, 2007, we had
$20.0 million of outstanding letters of credit, all of
which relates to the ExxonMobil joint development agreement.
In prior years, we have had letters of credit with some of our
commodity derivative contract counterparties. At any point in
time, we had hedge margin deposits and letters of credit equal
to the amount by which the current
mark-to-market
liability of our commodity derivative contracts exceeded the
margin maintenance thresholds we have negotiated with our
counterparties. Once a margin threshold was reached, we were
required to maintain cash reserves in an account with the
counterparty or post letters of credit in lieu of cash to ensure
future settlement were made pursuant to our contracts. These
funds were released back to us as our
mark-to-market
liability decreases due to either a drop in the futures prices
of oil and natural gas or the passage of time as settlements are
made. During the third quarter of 2006, we negotiated with these
counterparties to remove the letter of credit requirements as
long as our senior subordinated notes maintain their current
rating.
Liquidity
Cash on hand, internally generated cash flows, and the borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility are our major
sources of liquidity. We also have the ability to adjust our
level of capital expenditures. We may use other sources of
capital, including the issuance of additional debt or equity
securities, to fund any major acquisitions we might secure in
the future and to maintain our financial flexibility. Because of
rig and lease commitments, the Company expects its capital
expenditures to exceed operating cash flows in the first and
second quarters of 2007, but to be below cash flows from
operations in the third and fourth quarters of 2007.
Internally generated cash flows. Our internally generated
cash flows, results of operations, and financing for our
operations are dependent on oil and natural gas prices. Realized
oil and natural gas prices for 2006 remained constant as
compared to 2005. These prices have historically fluctuated
widely in response to changing market forces. For 2006,
approximately 65 percent of our production was oil. As we
previously discussed, our oil wellhead differentials during 2006
increased significantly from 2005, adversely impacting the
amount of oil revenues we received on our oil production. To the
extent oil and natural gas prices decline or we continue to
experience significantly increased wellhead differentials, our
earnings, cash flows from operations, and availability under our
revolving credit facility may be adversely impacted. Prolonged
periods of low oil and natural gas prices or sustained wider
than historical wellhead differentials could cause us to not be
in compliance with financial covenants under our revolving
credit facility and thereby affect our liquidity. We believe
that our internally generated cash flows and unused availability
under our revolving credit facility are sufficient to fund our
planned capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.
Revolving credit facility. Our principal source of
short-term liquidity is our revolving credit facility, which
matures on December 29, 2010. The revolving credit facility
is with a bank syndicate comprised of Bank of America, N.A. and
other lenders. The borrowing base is determined semi-annually
and may be increased or decreased, up to a maximum of
$750 million. The borrowing base as of December 31,
2006 was $550 million.
Our obligations under the revolving credit facility are
guaranteed by our restricted subsidiaries and secured by a first
priority-lien on substantially all of our proved oil and natural
gas reserves and a pledge of the capital stock and equity
interests of our restricted subsidiaries.
Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are
subject to varying rates of interest based on (i) the
amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility in
relation to the borrowing base and
57
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
(ii) whether the loan is a Eurodollar loan or a Base Rate
loan. The following table summarizes the calculation of the
various interest rates for both Eurodollar and Base Rate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Total Outstandings to Borrowing Base |
|
Eurodollar Loans(a) | |
|
Base Rate Loans(b) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Less than .40 to 1
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.000 |
% |
|
|
Base Rate + 0.000 |
% |
From .40 to 1 but less than .75 to 1
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.250 |
% |
|
|
Base Rate + 0.000 |
% |
From .75 to 1 but less than .90 to 1
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.500 |
% |
|
|
Base Rate + 0.250 |
% |
.90 to 1 or greater
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.750 |
% |
|
|
Base Rate + 0.500 |
% |
|
|
(a) |
The LIBOR rate is equal to the rate determined by Bank of
America, N.A. to be the average British Bankers Association
Interest Settlement Rate for deposits in dollars for a similar
interest period (either one, two, three, or six months, or such
other period that is twelve months or less as selected by us and
consented to by each lender). |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The Base Rate is calculated as the higher of (i) the annual
rate of interest announced by Bank of America, N.A. as its
prime rate and (ii) the federal funds effective
rate plus 0.5 percent. |
The borrowing base is redetermined each April 1 and October
1. The bank syndicate has the ability to request one additional
borrowing base redetermination per year, and we are permitted to
request two additional borrowing base redeterminations per year.
Generally, if amounts outstanding ever exceed the borrowing
base, we must reduce the amounts outstanding to the redetermined
borrowing base within six months, provided that if amounts
outstanding exceed the borrowing base as a result of any sale of
our assets or permitted subordinated debt, we must reduce the
amounts outstanding immediately upon consummation of the sale.
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be repaid at
anytime without penalty.
Our revolving credit facility contains financial and other
restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in
activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our
ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility is subject
to financial covenants consisting of a current ratio and an
interest coverage ratio. Our revolving credit facility limits
our ability to effect mergers, asset sales, and change of
control events. These covenants also contain restrictions
regarding our ability to incur additional indebtedness in the
future.
On December 31, 2006, we had $68 million outstanding
under the revolving credit facility. On February 20, 2007,
we had $211 million outstanding under the revolving credit
facility.
In connection with our proposed acquisitions from Anadarko, we
expect to enter into a new $1.25 billion five-year
revolving credit facility in March 2007 with an initial
borrowing base of $650 million that will increase to
$950 million upon completion of the Williston Basin
acquisition, which is scheduled to close in April 2007. We also
expect that one of our subsidiaries will enter into a
$300 million five-year revolving credit facility in March
2007 with a $115 million borrowing base and a
$10 million overadvance feature, which will be non-recourse
to us.
Indentures governing our senior subordinated
notes. We and our restricted subsidiaries are subject to
certain negative and financial covenants under the indentures
governing our
61/4% Notes,
our 6% Notes, and our
71/4% Notes
due 2017 (collectively, the Notes). The provisions
of the indentures limit our and our restricted
subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
pay dividends on our capital stock or redeem, repurchase or
retire our capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; |
|
|
|
make investments; |
58
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
incur liens; |
|
|
|
create any consensual limitation on the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends, make loans or transfer
property to us; |
|
|
|
engage in transactions with our affiliates; |
|
|
|
sell assets, including capital stock of our subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer assets. |
During any period that the Notes have investment grade ratings
from both Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and Standard and
Poors Ratings Services and no default has occurred and is
continuing, the foregoing covenants will cease to be in effect
with the exception of covenants that contain limitations on
liens and on, among other things, certain consolidations,
mergers and transfers of assets.
If we experience a change of control (as defined in the
indentures), subject to certain conditions, we must give holders
of the Notes the opportunity to sell to us their Notes at
101 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest.
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are
material to our financial position or results of operations.
|
|
|
Inflation and Changes in Prices |
Our revenues, the value of our assets, and our ability to obtain
bank loans or additional capital on attractive terms have been
and will continue to be affected by changes in oil and natural
gas prices. Historically, significant fluctuations have occurred
in oil and natural gas prices. The following table indicates the
average oil and natural gas prices received for 2006, 2005, and
2004. Average equivalent prices for 2006, 2005, and 2004 were
decreased by $5.37, $5.71, and $4.21 per BOE, respectively,
as a result of our hedging activities. Average prices per BOE
indicate the composite impact of changes in oil and natural gas
prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Price Realization with Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
47.30 |
|
|
$ |
44.82 |
|
|
$ |
33.04 |
|
|
Natural gas ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
Combined ($/BOE)
|
|
|
43.87 |
|
|
|
44.05 |
|
|
|
33.07 |
|
Average Wellhead Price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$ |
54.42 |
|
|
$ |
51.06 |
|
|
$ |
38.24 |
|
|
Natural gas ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
7.87 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
Combined ($/BOE)
|
|
|
49.24 |
|
|
|
49.76 |
|
|
|
37.28 |
|
The increase in oil and natural gas prices may be accompanied by
or result in: (i) increased well drilling costs, as the
demand for well drilling operations continues to increase;
(ii) increased severance taxes, as we are subject to higher
severance taxes due to the increased value of oil and natural
gas extracted from the wells; (iii) increased LOE due to
increased demand for services related to operating our wells;
and (iv) increased electricity costs. We believe our risk
management program and available borrowing capacity under our
revolving credit facility provide means for us to manage
commodity price risks through our hedging program.
59
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
reported amounts and related disclosures. Management considers
an accounting estimate to be critical if it requires assumptions
to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was
made, and changes in the estimate or different estimates that
could have been selected could have a material impact on
Encores consolidated results of operations or financial
condition. Management has identified the following critical
accounting policies and estimates.
Oil and Natural Gas Properties
Successful efforts method. We use the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and natural gas properties
under SFAS No. 19, Financial Accounting and
Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive and nonproductive
development wells are capitalized. Exploration expenses,
including geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals,
are charged to expense as incurred. Costs associated with
drilling exploratory wells are initially capitalized pending
determination of whether the well is economically productive or
nonproductive.
If an exploratory well does not find reserves or does not find
reserves in a sufficient quantity as to make them economically
producible, the previously capitalized costs are expensed in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations and shown as a non-cash
adjustment to net income in the Operating activities
section of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the
period in which the determination was made. If a determination
cannot be made within one year of the exploration well being
drilled and no other drilling or exploration activities to
evaluate the discovery are firmly planned, all previously
capitalized costs associated with the exploratory well are
expensed and shown as a non-cash adjustment to net income at
that time. Thus, we might expense the costs of a given well if
firm plans do not exist after one year, but later complete the
well as a producing property. This could occur as the expected
rate of return to complete a marginal well often is less than
other projects. Should this occur, we do not reverse the
previously expensed costs. Re-drilling or directional drilling
in a previously abandoned well is classified as development or
exploratory based on whether it is in a proved or unproved
reservoir. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance to sustain
or increase production from the existing producing reservoir are
charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures to recomplete a
current well in a different unproved reservoir are capitalized
pending determination that economic reserves have been added. If
the recompletion is not successful, the expenditures are charged
to expense. All capitalized costs associated with both
development and exploratory wells are shown as Development
of oil and natural gas properties in the Investing
activities section of our Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
DD&A expense is directly affected by our reserve estimates.
Any change in reserves directly impacts the amount of DD&A
expense that we recognize in a given period. Assuming no other
changes, such as an increase in depreciable base, as our
reserves increase, the amount of DD&A expense in a given
period decreases and vice versa. Changes in future commodity
prices would likely result in increases or decreases in
estimated recoverable reserves. DD&A expense associated with
lease and well equipment and intangible drilling costs are based
upon only proved developed reserves, while DD&A expense for
capitalized leasehold costs is based upon total proved reserves.
As a result, changes in the classification of our reserves could
have a material impact on our DD&A expense. Additionally,
Miller & Lents, our independent reserve engineers,
estimate our reserves once a year at December 31. As a
result, quarterly reported DD&A expense is based on
internally prepared estimates of reserves additions and
reclassifications to the December 31 amounts prepared by
Miller & Lents.
Significant tangible equipment added or replaced is capitalized.
Expenditures to construct facilities or increase the productive
capacity from existing reserves are capitalized. Internal costs
directly associated with the development of proved properties
are capitalized as a cost of the property and are classified
60
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
accordingly in our consolidated financial statements.
Capitalized costs are amortized on a
unit-of-production
basis over the remaining life of total proved developed reserves
or proved reserves, as applicable. Natural gas volumes are
converted to equivalent barrels of oil at the rate of six Mcf to
one Bbl of oil. Significant revisions to reserve estimates can
be and are made by our reserve engineers each year. Mostly these
are the result of changes in price, but as reserve quantities
are estimates, they can also change as more or better
information is collected, especially in the case of estimates in
newer fields. Downward revisions have the effect of increasing
our DD&A rate, while upward revisions have the effect of
decreasing our DD&A rate.
The costs of retired, sold, or abandoned properties that
constitute part of an amortization base are charged or credited,
net of proceeds received, to the accumulated DD&A reserve.
Gains or losses from the disposal of other properties are
recognized in the current period.
The annual estimate of reserves by Miller & Lents
results in a new DD&A rate which we use for the preceding
fourth quarter after adjusting for fourth quarter production. We
internally estimates reserve additions and reclassifications of
reserves from proved undeveloped to proved developed for use in
determining a DD&A rate at the end of the first, second, and
third quarters. These internal estimates are based on expected
results from the capital projects completed during the quarter,
adjusted for any clear deviations from expectations. These
estimated results may differ from the reserve additions and
reclassifications estimated by Miller & Lents at the
end of the year. However, we feel that by estimating the results
of capital projects throughout the year, our quarterly DD&A
rate is more accurate.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we are
required to assess the need for an impairment of capitalized
costs of long-lived assets to be held and used, including proved
oil and natural gas properties, whenever events and
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may
not be recoverable. If impairment is indicated based on a
comparison of the assets carrying value to its
undiscounted expected future net cash flows, then it is
recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair
value. Expected future net cash flows are based on existing
proved reserve and production information and pricing
assumptions that management believes are reasonable. Any
impairment charge incurred is expensed and reduces our recorded
basis in the asset pool. Management aggregates proved property
for impairment testing the same way as for calculating DD&A.
The price assumptions used to calculate undiscounted cash flows
is based on judgment. We use prices consistent with the prices
used in bidding on acquisitions and/or assessing capital
projects. These price assumptions are critical to the impairment
analysis as lower prices could trigger impairment while higher
prices would have the opposite effect.
Unproved properties, the majority of the costs of which relates
to the acquisition of leasehold interests, are assessed for
impairment on a property-by-property basis for individually
significant balances and on an aggregate basis for individually
insignificant balances. If the assessment indicates an
impairment, a loss is recognized by providing a valuation
allowance at the level consistent with the level at which
impairment was assessed. The impairment assessment is affected
by economic factors such as the results of exploration
activities, commodity price outlooks, remaining lease terms, and
potential shifts in business strategy employed by management. In
the case of individually insignificant balances, the amount of
the impairment loss recognized is determined by amortizing the
portion of these properties costs which we feel will not
be transferred to proved over the life of the lease. One of the
primary factors in determining what portion will not be
transferred to proved is the relative proportion of such
properties on which proved reserves have been found in the past.
Since the wells drilled on unproved acreage are inherently
exploratory in nature, actual results could vary from estimates
especially in newer areas in which we do not have a long history
of drilling. Unproved properties had a net book value of
$47.5 million and $37.6 million as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We recorded
charges for unproved acreage impairment in the amounts of
$10.9 million, $2.0 million, and $0.7 million in
2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
61
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Oil and natural gas reserves. Assumptions used by the
independent reserve engineers in calculating reserves or
regarding the future cash flows or fair value of our properties
are subject to change in the future. The accuracy of reserve
estimates is a function of: (i) the quality and quantity of
available data; (ii) the interpretation of that data;
(iii) the accuracy of various mandated economic
assumptions; and (iv) the judgment of the independent
reserve engineer. Future prices received for production and
future production costs may vary, perhaps significantly, from
the prices and costs assumed for purposes of calculating reserve
estimates. We may not be able to develop proved reserves within
the periods estimated. Furthermore, prices and costs will not
remain constant. Actual production may not equal the estimated
amounts used in the preparation of reserve projections. As these
estimates change, the amount of calculated reserves change. Any
change in reserves directly impacts our estimate of future cash
flows from the property, the propertys fair value, and our
depletion rate.
Asset retirement obligations. We are required to estimate
our eventual obligations associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition,
construction, and development of our oil and natural gas wells
and related facilities. We recognize the fair value of a
liability for an ARO in the period in which the liability is
incurred. The ARO is capitalized as part of the carrying amount
of our oil and natural gas properties at its discounted fair
value. The liability is then accreted each period until it is
settled or the well is sold, at which time the liability is
reversed.
The fair value of the liability associated with the ARO is
determined using significant assumptions, including current
estimates of the plugging and abandonment costs, annual
inflation of these costs, the productive life of the asset and
our risk-adjusted costs to settle such obligations discounted
using our risk-adjusted interest rate, which is calculated based
on comparisons of our current borrowing rate to U.S. Treasury
rates of a similar maturity. Changes in any of these assumptions
can result in significant revisions to the estimated ARO.
Revisions to the obligation are recorded with an offsetting
change to the carrying amount of the related oil and natural gas
properties asset, resulting in prospective changes to DD&A
expense and accretion of the liability. Because of the
subjectivity of assumptions and the relatively long life of most
of our oil and natural gas assets, the costs to ultimately
retire these assets may vary significantly from previous
estimates.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair value of the net assets acquired in the purchases
of Cortez in April 2004 and of Crusader in October 2005. See
Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data for additional information regarding
these acquisitions. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis or whenever indicators of impairment exist. We performed
our annual impairment test at December 31, 2006, and
determined that no impairment existed. If impairment is
determined to exist, we will measure our impairment based on a
comparison of the carrying value of goodwill to the implied fair
value of the goodwill. We would recognize an impairment charge
for any amount by which the carrying value of goodwill exceeds
its fair value. The goodwill test is performed at the reporting
unit level. We have determined that we have only one reporting
unit, which is oil and natural gas production in the United
States.
We allocate the purchase price paid for the acquisition of a
business to the assets and liabilities acquired based on the
estimated fair values of those assets and liabilities. Estimates
of fair value are based upon, among other things, reserve
estimates, anticipated future prices and costs, and expected net
cash flows to be generated by a property. These estimates are
often highly subjective and may have a material impact on the
amounts recorded for acquired assets and liabilities.
62
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Net Profits Interests
A major portion of our acreage position in the CCA is subject to
NPI ranging from one percent to 50 percent. The holders of
these NPIs are entitled to receive a fixed percentage of the
cash flow remaining after specified costs have been deducted
from net revenue. The net profits calculations are contractually
defined. In general, net profits are determined after
considering operating expense, overhead expense, interest
expense, and drilling costs. The amounts of reserves and
production calculated to be attributable to these NPIs are
deducted from our reserves and production data, and our revenues
are reported net of NPI payments. The reserves and production
that are attributed to the NPIs are calculated by dividing
estimated future NPI payments (in the case of reserves) or prior
period actual NPI payments (in the case of production) by the
commodity prices current at the determination date. Fluctuations
in commodity prices and the levels of development activities in
the CCA from period to period will impact the reserves and
production attributed to the NPIs and will have an inverse
effect on our reported reserves and production. Based largely on
a continued increase in commodity prices and production volumes,
we expect to make higher NPI payments in 2007 and possibly
beyond than we have in previous years, which directly impacts
our oil and natural gas revenues, production, reserves, and net
income.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized for our share of jointly owned
properties as oil and natural gas is produced and sold, net of
royalties and NPI payments. Natural gas revenues are also
reduced by any processing and other fees paid except for
transportation costs paid to third parties, which are recorded
as expense. Natural gas revenue is recorded using the sales
method of accounting whereby revenue is recognized as natural
gas is sold rather than as it is produced. Royalties, NPIs, and
severance taxes are paid based upon the actual price received
from the sales. To the extent actual quantities and values of
oil and natural gas are unavailable for a given reporting period
because of timing or information not received from third
parties, we estimate and record the expected sales volumes and
price for those properties. If our underproduced imbalance
position (i.e., we have cumulatively been over-allocated
production) is greater than our share of remaining reserves, we
record a liability for the excess at year-end prices. We also do
not recognize revenue for the production in tanks, oil marketed
on behalf of third parties, or oil purchased in pipelines that
has not been delivered to the purchaser yet. Our net oil
inventories in pipelines were 146,284 Bbls and
49,543 Bbls at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Natural gas imbalances at December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005, were 188,757 MMBTU
under-delivered to us and 204,400 MMBTU over-delivered to
us, respectively.
Income Taxes
Effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate is subject to
variability from period to period as a result of factors other
than changes in federal and state tax rates and/or changes in
tax laws which can affect tax paying companies. Our effective
tax rate is affected by changes in the allocation of property,
payroll, and revenues between states in which we own property as
rates vary from state to state. Our deferred taxes are
calculated using rates we expect to be in effect when they
become current. As the mix of property, payroll, and sales
varies by state, our estimated tax rate changes. Due to the size
of our gross deferred tax balances, a small change in our
estimated future tax rate can have a material effect on current
period earnings.
|
|
|
Hedging and Related Activities |
During July 2006, we elected to discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively for all of our commodity derivatives which were
previously accounted for as hedges. While this change will have
no effect on our cash flows, future results of operations will
be affected by
mark-to-market gains
and losses, which fluctuate with the swings in oil and natural
gas prices. As of July 2006, all of our remaining derivative
contracts accounted for as hedges were dedesignated. At the
point of dedesignation, the gain (loss) to be
63
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
amortized to revenue was established and is deferred in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL). We are
recognizing prospective
mark-to-market gains
and losses in earnings rather than deferring such amounts in
AOCL.
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement
(SFAS 157) |
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157.
SFAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be
based on the assumptions market participants would use when
pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. Under SFAS 157, fair value measurements would
be separately disclosed by level within the fair value
hierarchy. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. Encore has not
yet determined the impact, if any, that the implementation of
SFAS 157 will have on its results of operations or
financial condition.
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) |
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is not expected
to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements, which give our
current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can
identify our forward-looking statements by the fact that they do
not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These
statements may include words such as anticipate,
estimate, expect, project,
intend, plan, believe,
should, and other words and terms of similar
meaning. In particular, forward-looking statements included in
this Report relate to, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
expected capital expenditures and the focus of our capital
program; |
|
|
|
areas of future growth; |
|
|
|
our drilling program; |
|
|
|
future horizontal development, secondary development, and
tertiary recovery potential; |
|
|
|
the implementation of our HPAI program, the ability to expand
the program to other parts of the CCA and the effects thereof; |
|
|
|
the completion of current HPAI projects and the effects thereof; |
|
|
|
anticipated prices for oil and natural gas and expectations
regarding differentials between wellhead prices received and
benchmark prices (including, without limitation, the effects of
increased Canadian oil production and refinery turnarounds); |
|
|
|
projected revenues, lifting costs, LOE; production taxes,
DD&A expense, G&A expenses, other operating expenses,
and taxes; |
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
the benefits to be derived from acquisitions and divestitures; |
64
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
availability of pipeline capacity; |
|
|
|
expected hedging positions and payments related to hedging
contracts; |
|
|
|
expectations regarding working capital, cash flow, and
anticipated liquidity; |
|
|
|
projected borrowings under our revolving credit facility and
expectations regarding a new revolving credit facility; |
|
|
|
plans regarding an MLP; |
|
|
|
expected reductions in our debt levels and the steps taken to
reduce our debt; and |
|
|
|
marketing of oil and natural gas. |
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this Report. Our actual results may differ significantly from
the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Such
statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not
limited to, the matters discussed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Report and in our other
filings with the SEC. If one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions
prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those
indicated. We undertake no responsibility to update
forward-looking statements for changes related to these or any
other factors that may occur subsequent to this filing for any
reason.
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
Derivative policy. The purpose of our derivative program
is to mitigate the negative effects of declining commodity
prices on our business. We plan to continue in the normal course
of business to manage our exposure to fluctuating commodity
prices through the use of derivatives. In very limited
circumstances, we may enter into derivative financial
instruments to achieve other goals. One such instrument we have
used in the past would be a fixed to floating interest rate swap
to offset interest expense on fixed rate debt. We weigh the
increased risk of the instrument versus the potential cash flow
savings before entering into any derivative instrument designed
to achieve any goal other than risk reduction.
Counterparties. Our counterparties to commodity
derivative contracts include: Bank of America, BNP Paribas,
BP Corporation, Calyon, Deutsche Bank,
J. Aron & Company, Morgan Stanley, and Wachovia.
At December 31, 2006, we had committed greater than
10 percent of either our outstanding oil contracts or
natural gas contracts to the following counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Hedged Oil | |
|
Hedged Natural Gas | |
Counterparty |
|
Production Committed | |
|
Production Committed | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
BNP Paribas
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
66.6 |
% |
Calyon
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
Deutsche Bank
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
J. Aron & Company
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Wachovia
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Performance on all of our contracts with J. Aron &
Company is guaranteed by its parent, Goldman Sachs &
Co. We feel the credit-worthiness of our current counterparties
is sound and we do not anticipate any non-performance of
contractual obligations. As long as each counterparty maintains
an investment grade credit rating, pursuant to our hedging
contracts, no collateral is required.
In order to mitigate the credit risk of financial instruments,
we enter into master netting agreements with significant
counterparties. The master netting agreement is a standardized,
bilateral contract between
65
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
a given counterparty and us. Instead of treating separately each
financial transaction between our counterparty and us, the
master netting agreement enables our counterparty and us to
aggregate all financial trades and treat them as a single
agreement. This arrangement benefits us in three ways. First,
the netting of the value of all trades reduces the requirements
of daily collateral posting by us. Second, default by
counterparty under one financial trade can trigger rights for us
to terminate all financial trades with such counterparty. Third,
netting of settlement amounts reduces our credit exposure to a
given counterparty in the event of close-out.
Commodity price sensitivity. The tables in this section
provide information about derivative financial instruments to
which we were a party as of December 31, 2006 that are
sensitive to changes in oil and natural gas commodity prices.
We manage commodity price risk with swap contracts, put
contracts, and collar contracts. Swap contracts provide a fixed
price for a notional amount of sales volumes. Put contracts
provide a fixed floor price on a notional amount of sales
volumes while allowing full price participation if the relevant
index price closes above the floor price. Collar contracts
provide a floor price on a notional amount of sales volumes
while allowing some additional price participation if the
relevant index price closes above the floor price. Additionally,
we may occasionally short sell put contracts with a strike price
well below the floor price of a floor or collar in order to
offset some of the cost of the contract. The unrealized
mark-to-market loss on
commodity derivatives at December 31, 2006 was
approximately $56.4 million and is reflected in AOCL in our
Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2006, the
fair market value of our oil derivative contracts was a net
$3.6 million asset and the fair market value of our natural
gas derivative contracts was a net $10.0 million asset.
Based on our open commodity derivative positions at
December 31, 2006, a $1.00 increase in the NYMEX prices for
oil and natural gas would result in a decrease to our net
derivative fair value asset of approximately $12.9 million,
while a $1.00 decrease in the NYMEX prices for oil and natural
gas would result in an increase to our net derivative fair value
asset of approximately $15.3 million. These amounts exclude
deferred hedge premiums of $54.7 million at
December 31, 2006 that is not subject to changes in
commodity prices.
|
|
|
Oil Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Floor | |
|
Floor | |
|
Short Floor | |
|
Short Floor | |
|
Swap | |
|
Swap | |
|
Fair Market | |
Period |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Bbl) | |
|
(Per Bbl) | |
|
(Bbl) | |
|
(Per Bbl) | |
|
(Bbl) | |
|
(Per Bbl) | |
|
(In thousands) | |
Jan. Dec. 2007
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
53.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
$ |
(26,347 |
) |
Jan. June 2008
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
64.17 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
58.59 |
|
|
|
9,536 |
|
July Dec. 2008
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
66.25 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
Jan. Dec. 2009
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
Daily | |
|
Average |
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Floor | |
|
Floor | |
|
Short Floor | |
|
Short Floor |
|
Swap | |
|
Swap | |
|
Fair Market | |
Period |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Volume | |
|
Price |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Mcf) | |
|
(Per Mcf) | |
|
(Mcf) | |
|
(Per Mcf) |
|
(Mcf) | |
|
(Per Mcf) | |
|
(In thousands) | |
Jan. Dec. 2007
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
6.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.99 |
|
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
Jan. Dec. 2008
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate sensitivity. At December 31, 2006, we
had total long-term debt of $661.7 million, which is
recorded net of discount of $6.3 million. Of this amount,
$150 million bears interest at a fixed rate of
66
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
61/4 percent,
$300 million bears interest at a fixed rate of
6 percent, and $150 million bears interest at a fixed
rate of
71/4 percent.
The remaining outstanding long-term debt balance of
$68 million is under our revolving credit facility and is
subject to floating market rates of interest that are linked to
LIBOR.
At this level of floating rate debt, if the LIBOR rate increased
one percent, we would incur an additional $0.7 million of
interest expense per year, and if the rate decreased one
percent, we would incur $0.7 million less. Additionally, if
the LIBOR rate increased one percent, we estimate the fair value
of our fixed rate debt at December 31, 2006 would decrease
from $561.4 million to $527.0 million, and if the rate
decreased one percent, we estimate the fair value would increase
to $598.7 million.
67
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
68
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of:
Encore Acquisition Company:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Encore Acquisition Company (the Company) as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As explained in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated
February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Fort Worth, Texas
February 28, 2007
69
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
share and per share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
81,470 |
|
|
|
76,960 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
18,170 |
|
|
|
11,231 |
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
17,349 |
|
|
|
8,826 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
24,978 |
|
|
|
29,030 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
145,718 |
|
|
|
133,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and equipment, at cost successful efforts
method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
|
2,033,914 |
|
|
|
1,691,175 |
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
47,548 |
|
|
|
37,646 |
|
|
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
(364,780 |
) |
|
|
(255,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,682 |
|
|
|
1,473,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
18,231 |
|
|
|
15,894 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(7,791 |
) |
|
|
(5,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
|
|
10,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
60,606 |
|
|
|
59,046 |
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
40,715 |
|
|
|
17,316 |
|
Other
|
|
|
32,739 |
|
|
|
12,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,006,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,705,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
18,204 |
|
|
$ |
27,281 |
|
|
Accrued lease operations expense
|
|
|
8,582 |
|
|
|
6,633 |
|
|
Accrued development capital
|
|
|
44,492 |
|
|
|
38,899 |
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
11,273 |
|
|
|
12,531 |
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes payable
|
|
|
10,915 |
|
|
|
12,566 |
|
|
Accrued oil purchases
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
60,448 |
|
|
|
76,515 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,358 |
|
|
|
15,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
186,463 |
|
|
|
190,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
38,688 |
|
|
|
66,563 |
|
Future abandonment cost
|
|
|
19,205 |
|
|
|
14,430 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
282,825 |
|
|
|
213,268 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
661,696 |
|
|
|
673,189 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,190,035 |
|
|
|
1,158,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 144,000,000 shares
authorized, 53,046,675 and 48,784,846 issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
457,201 |
|
|
|
316,619 |
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, of 17,809 and 11,169 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
394,917 |
|
|
|
302,875 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(35,327 |
) |
|
|
(72,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
816,865 |
|
|
|
546,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,006,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,705,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
70
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$ |
346,974 |
|
|
$ |
307,959 |
|
|
$ |
220,649 |
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
146,325 |
|
|
|
149,365 |
|
|
|
77,884 |
|
|
Oil marketing
|
|
|
147,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
640,862 |
|
|
|
457,324 |
|
|
|
298,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operations
|
|
|
98,194 |
|
|
|
69,744 |
|
|
|
47,807 |
|
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
49,780 |
|
|
|
45,601 |
|
|
|
30,313 |
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
113,463 |
|
|
|
85,627 |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
30,519 |
|
|
|
14,443 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,194 |
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
12,059 |
|
|
Oil marketing
|
|
|
148,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value (gain) loss
|
|
|
(24,388 |
) |
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
10,023 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
449,356 |
|
|
|
266,935 |
|
|
|
152,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
191,506 |
|
|
|
190,389 |
|
|
|
145,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
(45,131 |
) |
|
|
(34,055 |
) |
|
|
(23,459 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expenses)
|
|
|
(43,702 |
) |
|
|
(33,016 |
) |
|
|
(23,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
147,804 |
|
|
|
157,373 |
|
|
|
122,639 |
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(55,406 |
) |
|
|
(53,948 |
) |
|
|
(40,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
92,398 |
|
|
$ |
103,425 |
|
|
$ |
82,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
51,865 |
|
|
|
48,682 |
|
|
|
47,090 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
52,736 |
|
|
|
49,522 |
|
|
|
47,738 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
71
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Loss | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
45,351 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
251,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
117,365 |
|
|
$ |
(10,030 |
) |
|
$ |
358,975 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,121 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
52,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,929 |
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,147 |
|
|
|
Change in deferred hedge gain/loss, net of tax of $15,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,367 |
) |
|
|
(26,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
48,654 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
309,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,512 |
|
|
|
(36,397 |
) |
|
|
473,575 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
Cancellation of treasury stock
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,425 |
|
|
|
Change in deferred hedge gain/loss, net of tax of $21,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,429 |
) |
|
|
(36,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
48,785 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
316,619 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
302,875 |
|
|
|
(72,826 |
) |
|
|
546,781 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
Cancellation of treasury stock
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
127,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,101 |
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,398 |
|
|
|
Change in deferred hedge gain/loss, net of tax of $22,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,499 |
|
|
|
37,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
53,047 |
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
$ |
457,201 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
394,917 |
|
|
$ |
(35,327 |
) |
|
$ |
816,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
72
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
92,398 |
|
|
$ |
103,425 |
|
|
$ |
82,147 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
113,463 |
|
|
|
85,627 |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
|
|
Non-cash exploration expense
|
|
|
28,128 |
|
|
|
10,706 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
51,220 |
|
|
|
56,032 |
|
|
|
38,579 |
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
Non-cash derivative fair value
|
|
|
(10,434 |
) |
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash expense
|
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(30,192 |
) |
|
|
(10,719 |
) |
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4,945 |
) |
|
|
(6,096 |
) |
|
|
(7,220 |
) |
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(4,798 |
) |
|
|
(5,568 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
10,080 |
|
|
|
39,669 |
|
|
|
9,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
297,333 |
|
|
|
292,269 |
|
|
|
171,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of assets
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
Purchases of other property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,290 |
) |
|
|
(6,767 |
) |
|
|
(7,594 |
) |
|
Acquisition of oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
(30,119 |
) |
|
|
(154,615 |
) |
|
|
(116,316 |
) |
|
Acquisition of Cortez Oil & Gas, Inc., net of cash
acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,808 |
) |
|
Acquisition of Crusader Energy Corp., net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Development of oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
(340,582 |
) |
|
|
(321,836 |
) |
|
|
(186,455 |
) |
|
Advances to working interest partners
|
|
|
(22,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(397,430 |
) |
|
|
(573,560 |
) |
|
|
(433,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
128,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,900 |
|
|
Offering costs paid
|
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(4,808 |
) |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
282,000 |
|
|
|
997,980 |
|
|
|
478,500 |
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(294,000 |
) |
|
|
(719,852 |
) |
|
|
(278,500 |
) |
|
Payments of deferred commodity premiums
|
|
|
(7,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash overdrafts
|
|
|
(10,911 |
) |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
11,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
99,206 |
|
|
|
281,842 |
|
|
|
262,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
73
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 1. |
Formation of the Company and Basis of Presentation |
Encore Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation
(Encore or the Company), is a company
engaged in the development of onshore North American oil and
natural gas reserves. Since 1998, Encore has acquired
high-quality assets and grown them through drilling, waterflood,
and tertiary projects. Encores properties are currently
located in four core areas: the Cedar Creek Anticline
(CCA) in the Williston Basin of Montana and North
Dakota; the Permian Basin of west Texas and southeastern New
Mexico; the Mid-Continent area, which includes the Arkoma and
Anadarko Basins of Oklahoma, the North Louisiana Salt Basin, the
East Texas Basin, and the Barnett Shale of northern Texas; and
the Rockies, which includes non-CCA assets in the Williston and
Powder River Basins of Montana and North Dakota, and the Paradox
Basin of southeastern Utah.
|
|
Note 2. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All
material intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks, money market
accounts, and all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less. On a bank-by-bank basis, cash
accounts that are overdrawn are reclassified to current
liabilities and any change in cash overdrafts is shown as
Change in cash overdrafts in the Financing
activities section of the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
Inventories are comprised principally of materials and supplies
and oil in pipelines, which are stated at the lower of cost
(determined on an average basis) or market. Oil produced at the
lease which resides unsold in pipelines is carried at an amount
equal to its operating costs to produce. Oil in pipelines
purchased from third parties is carried at average purchase
price. The Companys inventories consisted of the following
as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Warehouse inventory
|
|
$ |
11,784 |
|
|
$ |
9,019 |
|
Oil in pipelines
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
18,170 |
|
|
$ |
11,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Natural Gas Properties. The Company adheres to
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and
Gas Producing Companies (SFAS 19),
utilizing the successful efforts method of accounting for its
oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, all costs
associated with productive and nonproductive development wells
are capitalized. Exploration expenses, including geological and
geophysical expenses and delay rentals, are charged to expense
as incurred. Costs associated with drilling exploratory wells
are initially capitalized pending determination of whether the
well is economically productive or nonproductive.
74
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
If an exploratory well does not find reserves or does not find
reserves in a sufficient quantity as to make them economically
producible, the previously capitalized costs are expensed in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations and shown
as a non-cash adjustment to net income in the Operating
activities section of the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows in the period in which the
determination was made. If a determination cannot be made within
one year of the exploration well being drilled and no other
drilling or exploration activities to evaluate the discovery are
firmly planned, all previously capitalized costs associated with
the exploratory well are expensed and shown as a non-cash
adjustment to net income at that time. Re-drilling or
directional drilling in a previously abandoned well is
classified as development or exploratory based on whether it is
in a proved or unproved reservoir. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance to sustain or increase production from the existing
producing reservoir are charged to expense as incurred.
Expenditures to recomplete a current well in a different
unproved reservoir are capitalized pending determination that
economic reserves have been added. If the recompletion is not
successful, the expenditures are charged to expense. All
capitalized costs associated with both development and
exploratory wells are shown as Development of oil and
natural gas properties in the Investing
activities section of the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
Significant tangible equipment added or replaced is capitalized.
Expenditures to construct facilities or increase the productive
capacity from existing reserves are capitalized. Internal costs
directly associated with the development of proved properties
are capitalized as a cost of the property and are classified
accordingly in the Companys consolidated financial
statements. Capitalized costs are amortized on a
unit-of-production
basis over the remaining life of proved developed reserves or
total proved reserves, as applicable. Natural gas volumes are
converted to equivalent barrels of oil at the rate of six
thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of natural gas to one
barrel (Bbl) of oil.
The costs of retired, sold, or abandoned properties that
constitute part of an amortization base are charged or credited,
net of proceeds received, to the accumulated depletion,
depreciation, and amortization (DD&A) reserve.
Gains or losses from the disposal of other properties are
recognized in the current period.
Additionally, independent reserve engineers estimate the
Companys reserves once a year on December 31. This
results in a new DD&A rate which the Company uses for the
preceding fourth quarter after adjusting for fourth quarter
production. The Company internally estimates reserve additions
and reclassifications of reserves from proved undeveloped to
proved developed at the end of the first, second, and third
quarters for use in determining a DD&A rate for the quarter.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the
Company is required to assess the need for an impairment of
capitalized costs of long-lived assets to be held and used,
including proved oil and natural gas properties, whenever events
and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset
may not be recoverable. If impairment is indicated based on a
comparison of the assets carrying value to its
undiscounted expected future net cash flows, then it is
recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair
value. Expected future net cash flows are based on existing
proved reserve and production information and pricing
assumptions that management believes are representative of
future economics. Any impairment charge incurred is expensed and
reduces the recorded basis in the pool.
Unproved properties, the majority of the costs of which relate
to the acquisition of leasehold interests, are assessed for
impairment on a property-by-property basis for individually
significant balances and on an aggregate basis for individually
insignificant balances. If the assessment indicates an
impairment, a loss is recognized by providing a valuation
allowance at the level consistent with the level at which
impairment was assessed. The impairment assessment is affected
by economic factors such as the results of exploration
activities, commodity price outlooks, remaining lease terms, and
potential shifts in business strategy employed by management. In
the case of individually insignificant balances, the amount of
the impairment
75
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
loss recognized is determined by amortizing the portion of these
properties costs which we feel will not be transferred to
proved over the average life of the lease.
Other Property and Equipment. Other property and
equipment is carried at cost. Depreciation is expensed on a
straight-line basis over estimated useful lives, which range
from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized
and depreciated over the remaining term of the lease, which
currently is through 2013 for the Companys corporate
headquarters.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair value of the net assets acquired in the purchases
of Crusader Energy Corporation (Crusader) in October
2005 and Cortez Oil & Gas, Inc. (Cortez) in
April 2004. See Note 3. Acquisitions for
additional information. The Company tests goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis or whenever indicators of
impairment exist. The Company performed its annual impairment
test at December 31, 2006, and determined that no
impairment existed. If impairment is determined to exist, the
impairment is measured based on a comparison of the carrying
value of goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. An
impairment charge would be recognized for any amount by which
the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value. The
goodwill test is performed at the reporting unit level. The
Company has determined that it has only one reporting unit,
which is oil and natural gas production in the United States.
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations requires that the fair value of a
liability for an asset retirement obligation (ARO)
be recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred.
For oil and natural gas properties, this is the period in which
an oil or natural gas well is acquired or drilled. The ARO is
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the Companys
oil and natural gas properties at its discounted fair value. The
liability is then accreted each period until it is settled or
the well is sold, at which time the liability is reversed.
Estimates are based on historical experience in plugging and
abandoning wells and estimated remaining field life based on
reserve estimates. The Company does not provide for a market
risk premium associated with ARO because a reliable estimate
cannot be determined. See Note 5. AROs for
additional information.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R) using the
modified prospective method. SFAS 123R is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123)
and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25). SFAS 123R
eliminates the option of using the intrinsic value method of
accounting previously available, and requires companies to
recognize in the financial statements the cost of employee
services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments
based on the grant date fair value of those awards. Under the
modified prospective method, compensation cost is
recognized in the financial statements beginning with the
effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R, for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and for all
unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of
SFAS 123R. The Company continues to utilize a standard
option pricing model (i.e., Black-Scholes) to measure the fair
value of employee stock options under SFAS 123R. Under
SFAS 123R, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted
under SFAS 123 are no longer be an alternative to financial
statement recognition.
SFAS 123R also requires that the benefits associated with
the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be
reported as a financing cash flow. This requirement reduces net
operating cash flows and increases net financing cash flows. The
Company recognizes compensation costs related to awards
76
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period for each separately vesting portion of the award
as if the award was, in-substance, multiple awards.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, employee stock options
and restricted stock awards were accounted for under the
provisions of APB 25. Accordingly, no compensation expense
was recorded for stock options that were granted to employees or
non-employee directors with an exercise price equal to or above
the common stock price on the grant date. However, expense was
recorded related to restricted stock granted to employees.
Compensation expense associated with awards to employees who
were eligible for retirement was recognized over the explicit
service period of the award. Compensation expense for such
awards that are granted subsequent to the adoption of
SFAS 123R are fully expensed on the date of grant. If the
Company had recognized compensation expense at the time an
employee became eligible for retirement and had satisfied all
performance requirements, non-cash stock-based compensation
expense would have increased by $1.0 million and
$0.3 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. See
Note 12. Employee Benefit Plans for additional
information.
During 2005 and 2004, if compensation expense for the
stock-based awards had been determined using the provisions of
SFAS 123R, the Companys net income and net income per
share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
per share amounts) | |
As Reported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation, net of tax
|
|
$ |
2,483 |
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
103,425 |
|
|
|
82,147 |
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
Pro Forma:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation, net of tax
|
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
102,817 |
|
|
|
80,966 |
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
Segment reporting is not applicable to the Company as it has a
single Company-wide management team that administers all
properties as a whole rather than by discrete operating
segments. The Company does not track all material costs to
develop and operate its properties at a level lower than the
total Company level, nor does its current internal reporting
structure allow for accurate tracking at a lower level.
Throughout the year, the Company allocates capital resources to
projects on a project-by-project basis, across its entire asset
base to maximize profitability without regard to individual
areas or segments.
In 2006, Shell Trading Company (Shell) and
ConocoPhillips Company (ConocoPhillips) accounted
for 15 percent and 12 percent, respectively, of total
sales of production. In 2005, 26 percent, 16 percent,
14 percent, and 10 percent of total oil and natural
gas production was sold to Shell, Eighty-Eight Oil, BP, and
Chevron, respectively. In 2004, 29 percent and
27 percent of total oil and natural gas production was sold
to Shell and ConocoPhillips, respectively.
77
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future
tax consequences attributable to differences between financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to
amounts expected to be realized. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Revenues are recognized for the Companys share of jointly
owned properties as oil and natural gas is produced and sold,
net of royalties and net profits interest payments. Revenues are
also reduced by any processing and other fees paid, except for
transportation costs paid to third parties which are recorded as
expense. Natural gas revenues are recorded using the sales
method of accounting, whereby revenue is recognized as natural
gas is sold rather than as produced. Royalties, net profits
interests, and severance taxes are paid based upon the actual
price received from the sales. To the extent actual quantities
and values of oil and natural gas are unavailable for a given
reporting period because of timing or information not received
from third parties, the Company estimates and records the
expected sales volumes and values for those properties. If the
Companys underproduced imbalance position (i.e., the
Company has cumulatively been over-allocated production) is
greater than the Companys share of remaining reserves, the
Company records a liability for the excess at year-end prices.
The Company also does not recognize revenue for the production
in tanks, oil marketed on behalf of joint owners in the
Companys oil and natural gas properties, or oil in
pipelines that has not been delivered to the purchaser. The
Companys net oil inventories in pipelines were
146,284 barrels (Bbls) and 49,543 Bbls at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Natural gas
imbalances at December 31, 2006 and 2005, were
188,757 million British thermal units (MMBTU)
under-delivered to the Company and 204,400 MMBTU
over-delivered to the Company, respectively.
|
|
|
Oil Marketing Revenues and Expenses and Buy/ Sell
Transactions |
In 2006, Encore began purchasing third-party oil Bbls from a
counterparty other than to whom the Bbls were sold for
aggregation and sale with our own equity production. These
purchases are conducted for strategic purposes to assist the
Company in marketing its production by decreasing its dependence
on individual markets. These activities allow the Company to
aggregate larger volumes, facilitate its efforts to maximize the
prices received for production, provide for a greater allocation
of future pipeline capacity in the event of curtailments, and
enable it to reach other markets.
Oil marketing revenues derived from sales of oil purchased from
third parties is recognized when persuasive evidence of a sales
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is
fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Oil marketing expenses includes the cost of oil volumes
purchased from third parties, as well as, transportation charges
related to the purchased volumes, mostly in the form of pipeline
tariffs. As the Company takes title to the oil and has risks and
rewards of ownership, these transactions are presented gross in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations, unless they meet the
criteria for netting as outlined in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 04-13,
Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the
Same Counterparty
(EITF 04-13).
Prior to 2006, oil marketing activities were not material.
EITF 04-13
requires that two or more inventory purchase and sale
transactions with the same counterparty that are entered into in
contemplation of one another be viewed as a single exchange
transaction and netted in accordance with the provisions of APB
Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions. These types of transactions are commonly
referred to as Buy/ Sell
78
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transactions in the oil and gas industry. The net gain/loss from
Buy/ Sell transactions with produced oil volumes is
recorded as an adjustment to Oil Revenues. The net gain/loss
from Buy/ Sell transactions with oil volumes
purchased from third parties is recorded as an adjustment to Oil
Marketing Revenues.
Shipping costs of our production in the form of pipeline fees
and trucking costs paid to third parties are incurred to
transport oil and natural gas production from certain properties
to a different market location for ultimate sale. These costs
are included in other operating expense and marketing costs, as
applicable, in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
|
|
|
Hedging and Related Activities |
Encore uses various financial instruments for non-trading
purposes to manage and reduce price volatility and other market
risks associated with the Companys oil and natural gas
production. These arrangements are structured to reduce the
Companys exposure to commodity price decreases, but they
can also limit the benefit the Company might otherwise receive
from commodity price increases. Encores risk management
activity is generally accomplished through
over-the-counter
forward derivative or option contracts with large financial
institutions.
During July 2006, the Company elected to discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively for all commodity derivatives which
were previously accounted for as hedges. From that point
forward, all
mark-to-market gains or
losses on these derivative instruments are recorded in
Derivative fair value (gain) loss in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net
deferred loss at the time of discontinuance of hedge accounting
is being amortized to oil and natural gas revenues over the
remaining term of the underlying contract.
Prior to July 2006, the Company used hedge accounting to account
for its commodity derivatives. If a derivative did not qualify
for hedge accounting, it was adjusted to fair value through
earnings. However, if a derivative qualified for hedge
accounting, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in
fair value could have been offset against the change in fair
value of the hedged item through earnings or recognized in other
comprehensive income until such time as the hedged item was
recognized in earnings.
To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, the cash flows from
the hedging instrument had to be highly effective in offsetting
changes in cash flows of the hedged item. In addition, all
hedging relationships had to be designated, documented, and
reassessed periodically.
The effective portion of the
mark-to-market gain or
loss on these derivative instruments was recorded in other
comprehensive income in stockholders equity and
reclassified into earnings in the same period in which the
hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of
the mark-to-market gain
or loss was recognized into earnings immediately.
Comprehensive income includes net income and other comprehensive
income, which includes the change in unrealized gains and losses
on derivative financial instruments. The Company chooses to show
comprehensive income annually as part of its Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity.
Preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make certain estimations and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the
consolidated
79
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses reported. Actual results could differ materially from
those estimates.
Estimates made in preparing these consolidated financial
statements include, among other things, the Companys
estimated proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes used in
calculating DD&A expense; the estimated future cash flows
and fair value of properties used in determining the need for
any impairment write-down; and the timing and amount of future
abandonment costs used in calculating the Companys AROs.
Future changes in the assumptions used could have a significant
impact on reported results in future periods.
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement
(SFAS 157) |
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 clarifies
the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions
market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability
and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
information used to develop those assumptions. Under
SFAS 157, fair value measurements would be separately
disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.
SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Encore has not yet determined
the impact, if any, that the implementation of SFAS 157
will have on its results of operations or financial condition.
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) |
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect, if any, FIN 48 will have,
but currently it is not expected to have a material impact on
the Companys financial condition, results of operations,
or cash flows.
Note 3. Acquisitions
Williston Basin Acquisition. On September 8, 2005,
the Company acquired oil and natural gas properties in the
Williston Basin for a purchase price of approximately
$28.6 million. Production from the properties, which are
concentrated primarily in the Crane Field in Montana and the
Tracy Mountain Field in North Dakota, is approximately
94 percent oil and 77 percent operated.
Crusader Acquisition. On October 14, 2005, the
Company purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of
Crusader, a privately held, independent oil and natural gas
company, for a purchase price of approximately
$109.6 million, which includes cash paid to Crusaders
former shareholders of $79.1 million, the repayment of
$29.7 million of Crusaders debt, and transaction
costs of $0.7 million.
The acquired properties are located primarily in the western
Anadarko Basin and the Golden Trend area of Oklahoma.
Crusaders operating results are included in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations beginning
in October 2005.
80
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The final calculation of the total purchase price and the
allocation to the fair value of net assets acquired from
Crusader are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of total purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to Crusaders former owners
|
|
$ |
79,142 |
|
|
Crusader debt repaid
|
|
|
29,732 |
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$ |
109,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of purchase price to the fair value of assets
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
18,592 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
Proved oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
85,388 |
|
|
Unproved oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
6,863 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
138,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(10,267 |
) |
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,190 |
) |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(17,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(29,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
109,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price allocation resulted in $22.7 million of
goodwill primarily as the result of the difference between the
fair value of acquired oil and natural gas properties and their
lower carryover tax basis, which resulted in deferred taxes of
$15.9 million. Management believes the goodwill will be
recovered through operating synergies resulting from the close
proximity of the properties acquired to existing operations.
None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.
Kerr-McGee Acquisition. On November 30, 2005, the
Company acquired oil and natural gas properties from Kerr-McGee
Corporation for a purchase price of approximately
$101.4 million. The acquired properties are located in the
Levelland-Slaughter, Howard Glasscock, Nolley-McFarland, and
Hutex fields in west Texas and the Oakdale, Calumet, and Rush
Springs fields in western Oklahoma. The operating results for
these properties are included in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations beginning in December 2005.
Cortez Acquisition. On April 14, 2004, the Company
purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of Cortez, a
privately held, independent oil and natural gas company, for a
total purchase price of $127.0 million, which includes cash
paid to Cortez former shareholders of $85.8 million,
the repayment of $39.4 million of Cortez debt, and
transaction costs of $1.8 million.
The acquired oil and natural gas properties are located
primarily in the CCA of Montana, the Permian Basin of west Texas
and southeastern New Mexico, and in the Mid-Continent area,
including the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins of Oklahoma and the
Barnett Shale of north Texas. Cortez operating results are
included in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Operations beginning in April 2004.
81
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The final calculation of the total purchase price and the
allocation to the fair value of net assets acquired from Cortez
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of total purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to Cortezs former owners
|
|
$ |
85,805 |
|
|
Cortez debt repaid
|
|
|
39,449 |
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$ |
127,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of purchase price to the fair value of assets
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
Proved oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
120,503 |
|
|
Unproved oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
37,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
170,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(5,673 |
) |
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(36,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(43,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
127,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price allocation resulted in $37.9 million of
goodwill primarily as the result of the difference between the
fair value of acquired oil and natural gas properties and their
lower carryover tax basis, which resulted in deferred taxes of
$36.9 million. Management believes the goodwill will be
recovered through operating synergies resulting from the close
proximity of the properties acquired to existing operations,
particularly the additional interest in the CCA and Permian
properties acquired through the Cortez acquisition. None of the
goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.
Overton. On June 17, 2004, the Company completed the
acquisition of natural gas producing properties and undeveloped
leases in the Overton Field located in Smith County, Texas for
$83.1 million. The Overton Field assets are in the same
core area as the Companys interests in Elm Grove Field and
have similar geology. The operating results for these properties
are included in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Operations beginning in July 2004.
|
|
Note 4. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company is a party to ongoing legal proceedings in the
ordinary course of business. Management does not believe the
result of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse
effect on the Company.
82
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Encore leases office space and equipment that have remaining
non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year. The following
table summarizes by year the remaining non-cancelable future
payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2006
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
2010
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
2011
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys operating lease rental expense was
approximately $4.5 million, $3.1 million, and
$3.5 million in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
In March 2006, Encore entered into a joint development agreement
with ExxonMobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) to develop
legacy natural gas fields in West Texas. Under the terms of the
agreement, Encore will have the opportunity to develop
approximately 100,000 gross acres. Encore will earn
30 percent of ExxonMobils working interest and
22.5 percent of ExxonMobils net revenue interest in
each well drilled. Encore will operate each well during the
drilling and completion phase, after which ExxonMobil will
assume operational control of the well.
Encore will earn the right to participate in all fields by
drilling a total of 24 commitment wells. During the
commitment phase, ExxonMobil will have the option to receive
non-recourse advanced funds from Encore attributable to
ExxonMobils 70 percent working interest in each
commitment well. Once a commitment well is producing, ExxonMobil
will repay 95 percent of the advanced funds plus accrued
interest assessed on the unpaid balance through Encores
monthly receipt of future proceeds of oil and natural gas sales.
As an alternative to receiving advanced funds during the
commitment phase, ExxonMobil can elect to pay their share of
capital costs for each well. After Encore has fulfilled its
obligations under the commitment phase, Encore will be entitled
to a 30 percent working interest in future drilling
locations. Encore will have the right to propose and drill wells
for as long as Encore is engaged in continuous drilling
operations.
In April 2006, Encore commenced drilling in the development
areas and by June 2006 operated four drilling rigs. A total of
24 wells were drilled during 2006, 12 of which were
commitment wells. By the end of the year Encore had fulfilled
its obligation in two development areas (Brown Bassett
Wolfcamp and Wilshire Devonian).
During 2006, we advanced $22.4 million to ExxonMobil for
their portion of capital on drilling the commitment wells, of
which $21.0 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. Of this
amount, $3.0 million is included in Accounts
receivable and $18.0 million is included in
Other assets on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets. During 2006, the Company wrote off
$1.9 million of ExxonMobils portion of capital costs
related to a dry hole in Other Operating on the
Companys 2006 Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of
December 31, 2006, Encore still had 12 wells to drill
in order to fulfill its obligation under the joint development
agreement.
83
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys primary AROs relate to future plugging and
abandonment expenses on oil and natural gas properties and
related facilities disposal. The Company does not include a
market risk premium in its risk estimates as the effect would
not be material. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had
$4.9 million held in an escrow account from which funds are
released only for reimbursement of plugging and abandonment
expenses on Encores Bell Creek property. This amount is
included in Other assets in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the
changes in the Companys future abandonment liability, the
long-term portion of which is recorded in Future
abandonment cost on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets for 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Future abandonment liability at January 1
|
|
$ |
14,430 |
|
|
$ |
6,601 |
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
Wells drilled
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
Plugging and abandonment costs incurred
|
|
|
(1,466 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
Revision of estimates
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future abandonment liability at December 31
|
|
$ |
19,841 |
|
|
$ |
14,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, the Company increased its discounted estimate of
future plugging liability by $5.2 million due to an
increase in estimated future plugging cost per well and
shortened field lives due to decreases in oil and natural gas
prices.
Note 6. Capitalization of
Exploratory Well Costs
The Company adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 19-1
Accounting for Suspended Well Costs
(FSP 19-1)
on July 1, 2005.
FSP 19-1 amends
SFAS 19 to permit the continued capitalization of
exploratory well costs beyond one year if the well found a
sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a
producing well and the Company is making sufficient progress
assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability
of the project. Upon the adoption of
FSP 19-1, the
Company evaluated all existing capitalized exploratory well
costs and determined that there was no impact on the
Companys results of operations, financial condition, or
cash flows. The Company drilled its first exploratory well in
the second quarter of 2004. The following table reflects the net
changes in capitalized exploratory well costs during 2006, 2005,
and 2004, and does not include amounts that were capitalized and
subsequently expensed in the same period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Beginning balance at January 1
|
|
$ |
6,560 |
|
|
$ |
3,242 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending the
determination of proved reserves
|
|
|
13,048 |
|
|
|
6,560 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
Reclassification to proved property and equipment based on the
determination of proved reserves
|
|
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense
|
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
(2,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13,048 |
|
|
$ |
6,560 |
|
|
$ |
3,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
All of the capitalized exploratory well costs at
December 31, 2006 related to wells in progress or wells for
which drilling had been completed for less than one year.
Note 7. Accounts Payable
and Other Current Liabilities
The Companys other current liabilities consisted of the
following as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Oil and natural gas revenues payable
|
|
$ |
8,612 |
|
|
$ |
4,544 |
|
Net profits payable
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
Acquired gas imbalances
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Accrued bonus
|
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
21,358 |
|
|
$ |
15,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Long-Term Debt
The Companys long-term debt consisted of the following as
of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$ |
68,000 |
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
61/4% Notes
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
6% Notes, net of unamortized discount of $4,892 and $5,317,
respectively
|
|
|
295,108 |
|
|
|
294,683 |
|
71/4% Notes,
net of unamortized discount of $1,412 and $1,494, respectively
|
|
|
148,588 |
|
|
|
148,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
661,696 |
|
|
$ |
673,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes |
61/4% Notes.
On April 2, 2004, the Company issued $150 million of
its 6 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due April 15,
2014 (the
61/4% Notes).
The Company received net proceeds of approximately
$146.4 million after paying all costs associated with the
offering. The net proceeds were used to fund the acquisition of
Cortez and to reduce outstanding borrowings under the
Companys revolving credit facility. Interest on the
61/4% Notes
is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15.
6% Notes. On July 13, 2005, the Company issued
$300 million of its 6% Senior Subordinated Notes due
July 15, 2015 (the 6% Notes). The Company
received net proceeds of approximately $294.5 million from
the private placement and used approximately $165.9 million
of the net proceeds to redeem all of the Companys
outstanding
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes. The remaining net proceeds from the issuance
were used to reduce outstanding borrowings under the
Companys revolving credit facility. Interest on the
6% Notes is due semi-annually on January 15 and
July 15.
71/4% Notes.
On November 23, 2005, the Company issued $150 million
of its
71/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2017 (the
71/4% Notes
and together with the
61/4% Notes
and the 6% Notes, the Notes). The net proceeds
of approximately $148.5 million were used to reduce
85
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
outstanding borrowings under the Companys revolving credit
facility. Interest on the 7 1/4% Notes is due semi-annually
on June 1 and December 1.
As of December 31, 2006 all of the Companys
subsidiaries are subsidiary guarantors of the Notes. Since
(i) each subsidiary guarantor is wholly owned by the
Company, (ii) the Company has no assets or operations that
are independent of its subsidiaries, (iii) the subsidiary
guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and
several, and (iv) all of the Companys subsidiaries
are subsidiary guarantors, the Company has not included the
financial statements of each subsidiary in this report. The
subsidiary guarantors may without restriction transfer funds to
the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans, and advances.
The indentures governing the Notes contain certain affirmative,
negative, and financial covenants, which include (as defined in
the indentures): (i) limitations on incurrence of
additional debt, restrictions on asset dispositions, and
restricted payments, (ii) maintenance of a 1.0 to 1.0
current ratio, and (iii) maintenance of EBITDA to interest
expense ratio of 2.5 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Notes.
If the Company experiences a change of control (as defined in
the indentures), subject to certain conditions, it must give
holders of the Notes the opportunity to sell their Notes to the
Company at 101 percent of the principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
On August 19, 2004, the Company entered into an amended and
restated five-year
senior secured revolving credit facility (the revolving
credit facility) with a bank syndicate comprised of Bank
of America, N.A. and other lenders. Availability under the
revolving credit facility is determined through semi-annual
borrowing base determinations and may be increased or decreased.
The initial borrowing base was $400 million and may be
increased to up to $750 million. The borrowing base as of
December 31, 2006 was $550 million. The revolving
credit facility matures on December 29, 2010. As of
December 31, 2006, the Company had $460.9 million of
available borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility.
The Companys obligations under the revolving credit
facility are guaranteed by its restricted subsidiaries and
secured by a first priority-lien on substantially all of its
proved oil and natural gas reserves and a pledge of the capital
stock and equity interests of the Companys restricted
subsidiaries.
Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are
subject to varying rates of interest based on (i) the
amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility in
relation to the borrowing base and (ii) whether the loan is
a Eurodollar loan or a base rate loan. The following table
summarizes the calculation of the various interest rates for
both Eurodollar and base rate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Total Outstandings to Borrowing Base |
|
Eurodollar Loans(a) | |
|
Base Rate Loans(b) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Less than .40 to 1
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.000% |
|
|
|
Base Rate + 0.000% |
|
From .40 to 1 but less than .75 to 1
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.250% |
|
|
|
Base Rate + 0.000% |
|
From .75 to 1 but less than .90 to 1
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.500% |
|
|
|
Base Rate + 0.250% |
|
.90 to 1 or greater
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.750% |
|
|
|
Base Rate + 0.500% |
|
|
|
(a) |
The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is equal
to the rate determined by Bank of America, N.A. to be the
average British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rate for
deposits in dollars for a similar interest period (either one,
two, three, or six months, or such other period that is twelve
months of less as selected by Encore and consented to by each
lender). |
|
(b) |
The Base Rate is calculated as the higher of (i) the annual
rate of interest announced by Bank of America, N.A. as its
prime rate and (ii) the federal funds effective
rate plus 0.5 percent. |
86
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The borrowing base is redetermined each April 1 and October
1. The bank syndicate has the ability to request one additional
borrowing base redetermination per year, and the Company is
permitted to request two additional borrowing base
redeterminations per year. Generally, if amounts outstanding
ever exceed the borrowing base, the Company must reduce the
amounts outstanding to the redetermined borrowing base within
six months, provided that if amounts outstanding exceed the
borrowing base as a result of any sale of the Companys
assets or permitted subordinated debt, the Company must reduce
the amounts outstanding immediately upon consummation of the
sale.
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be repaid
from time to time without penalty.
The revolving credit facility contains certain affirmative,
negative, and financial covenants, which include (as defined in
the revolving credit facility), but are not limited to:
(i) limitations on the incurrence of additional debt,
payment of dividends, repurchases of the Companys common
stock, asset dispositions, and restricted payments,
(ii) maintenance of at least a 1.0 to 1.0 current ratio,
and (iii) maintenance of consolidated EBITDAX to interest
expense ratio of at least 2.5 to 1.0. As of December 31,
2006, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the
revolving credit facility.
The Company incurs a commitment fee on the unused portion of the
revolving credit facility determined based on the ratio of
amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility to the
borrowing base in effect on such date. Any outstanding letters
of credit reduce the availability under the Companys
revolving credit facility. The following table summarizes the
calculation of the Companys commitment fee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment | |
Ratio of Total Outstandings to Borrowing Base |
|
Fee Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Less than .40 to 1
|
|
|
0.250% |
|
From .40 to 1 but less than .90 to 1
|
|
|
0.375% |
|
.90 to 1 or greater
|
|
|
0.500% |
|
During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the weighted average interest rates
for the Companys revolving credit facility were
4.5 percent, 6.5 percent, and 6.6 percent,
respectively.
On April 4, 2006, the Company closed a public offering of
its common stock for net proceeds of approximately
$127.1 million, a portion of which was used to reduce
borrowings under the revolving credit facility. See
Note 10. Stockholders Equity for
additional information.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had $21.1 million of
outstanding letters of credit, $20.0 million of which
related to the ExxonMobil joint development agreement. At
December 31, 2005, the Company had $50.0 million of
outstanding letters of credit at that were posted primarily with
two counterparties to the Companys commodity derivative
contracts and are used in lieu of cash margin deposits with
those counterparties.
87
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Maturities |
The following table illustrates the Companys long-term
debt maturities at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
2007 |
|
2008-2009 |
|
2010-2011 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
61/4% Notes
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
6% Notes
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
71/4% Notes
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
668,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated cash payments for interest were $46.4 million,
$24.2 million, and $21.4 million for 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively.
During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the weighted average interest rate
for total indebtedness, including the Notes, the revolving
credit facility, letters of credit, and related miscellaneous
fees was 6.1 percent, 6.8 percent, and
7.7 percent, respectively.
Note 9. Taxes
The components of the income tax provision are as follows for
2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
3,785 |
|
|
$ |
(2,084 |
) |
|
$ |
1,788 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
48,327 |
|
|
|
53,147 |
|
|
|
35,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federal
|
|
|
52,112 |
|
|
|
51,063 |
|
|
|
37,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State (net of federal benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total state
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision(a)
|
|
$ |
55,406 |
|
|
$ |
53,948 |
|
|
$ |
40,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
These amounts do not include the Companys excess tax
benefit related to stock option exercises and vesting of
restricted stock, which was recorded directly to additional
paid-in capital, of $1.3 million, $1.4 million, and $1.3 million
during 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. |
88
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reconciles income tax expense with income
tax at the Federal statutory rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
147,804 |
|
|
$ |
157,373 |
|
|
$ |
122,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
51,731 |
|
|
$ |
55,081 |
|
|
$ |
42,923 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
Section 43 credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,227 |
) |
|
|
(3,816 |
) |
Permanent and other
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$ |
55,406 |
|
|
$ |
53,948 |
|
|
$ |
40,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Enhanced Oil Recovery credits available under
Section 43 were fully phased out for the 2006 tax year due
to high oil prices in 2005. Therefore, no credits were generated
during 2006. In addition, a Texas franchise tax reform measure
was signed into law on May 18, 2006, which caused the Texas
franchise tax to be applicable to numerous types of entities
that previously were not subject to the tax, including several
of Encores subsidiaries. The Company adjusted its net
deferred tax balances using the new higher marginal tax rate it
expects to be effective when those deferred taxes reverse
resulting in a charge of $1.1 million during 2006.
Cash income tax payments in the amount of $0.5 million,
$0.2 million, and $3.7 million were made in 2006,
2005, and 2004, respectively. The Company recognized in equity a
benefit resulting from the reduction in income taxes payable
related to the exercise of employee stock options and the
vesting of restricted stock in the amount of $1.3 million,
$1.4 million, and $1.4 million in 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively.
The major components of the net current deferred tax asset and
net long-term deferred tax liability are as follows as of the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized hedge loss in other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
20,049 |
|
|
$ |
26,427 |
|
|
|
Derivative fair value loss
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
24,978 |
|
|
$ |
29,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative minimum tax carryforward
|
|
$ |
2,394 |
|
|
$ |
2,073 |
|
|
|
Unrealized hedge loss in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
16,964 |
|
|
|
Derivative fair value loss
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
Section 43 credits
|
|
|
13,227 |
|
|
|
13,227 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
24,911 |
|
|
|
36,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book basis of oil and natural gas properties in excess of tax
basis
|
|
|
(307,736 |
) |
|
|
(249,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
(282,825 |
) |
|
$ |
(213,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes Other than Income Taxes |
Taxes other than income taxes were comprised of the following
for 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Production and severance taxes
|
|
$ |
43,458 |
|
|
$ |
41,195 |
|
|
$ |
27,491 |
|
Property and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
6,322 |
|
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
Franchise, payroll, and other taxes
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
51,525 |
|
|
$ |
46,847 |
|
|
$ |
31,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
Public Offerings of Common Stock |
In April 2006, the Company closed a public offering of
4.0 million shares of the Companys common stock at a
price of $32.00 per share. The net proceeds of the
offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions
and expenses of the offering, were approximately
$127.1 million. The Company used the net proceeds of this
offering to reduce outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit facility, to invest in oil and natural gas activities,
and to pay general corporate expenses.
In June 2004, the Company closed a public offering of
3.0 million shares of common stock at a price to the public
of $17.97 per share. The net proceeds of the offering,
after underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses of the
offering, were approximately $52.9 million. The Company
used the net proceeds of this offering to reduce outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit facility and for general
corporate purposes.
|
|
|
Shelf Registration Statement on
Form S-3 |
On June 30, 2004, the Company filed a shelf
registration statement on
Form S-3 with the
Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). Using this
process, Encore may offer common stock, preferred stock, senior
debt, and/or subordinated debt in one or more offerings with a
total initial offering price of
90
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
up to $500 million. On November 23, 2005, the Company
issued $150 million of
71/4% Notes
under the shelf.
On June 15, 2005, the Company announced that its Board of
Directors (the Board) approved a three-for-two split
of the Companys outstanding common stock in the form of a
stock dividend. The dividend was distributed on July 12,
2005, to stockholders of record at the close of business on
June 27, 2005 (the Record Date). In lieu of
issuing fractional shares, the Company paid cash for such
fractional shares based on the closing price of the common stock
on the Record Date.
|
|
|
Common Stock Option Exercises |
During 2006, 2005, and 2004, employees of the Company exercised
178,174, 137,413, and 303,865 options, respectively, for which
the Company received proceeds of $2.3 million,
$1.5 million, and $2.8 million in 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively.
The Companys authorized capital stock includes
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, none of which were
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 or 2005. The
Company has no current plans to issue any shares of preferred
stock.
Note 11. Earnings Per Share
(EPS)
Under SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share, the Company must report basic EPS, which
excludes the effect of potentially dilutive securities, and
diluted EPS, which includes the effect of all potentially
dilutive securities. EPS for the periods presented is based on
the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period.
The following table reflects EPS data for 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
92,398 |
|
|
$ |
103,425 |
|
|
$ |
82,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
51,865 |
|
|
|
48,682 |
|
|
|
47,090 |
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive options and diluted restricted stock(a)
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted EPS
|
|
|
52,736 |
|
|
|
49,522 |
|
|
|
47,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
|
(a) |
Options to purchase 190,406 shares of common stock
were outstanding but not included in the above calculation of
2006 EPS because their effect would be antidilutive. There were
no antidilutive options or shares of restricted stock for 2005
or 2004. |
91
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 12. Employee Benefit
Plans
The Company made contributions to the Encore Acquisition Company
401(k) Plan, which is a voluntary and contributory plan for
eligible employees based on a percentage of employee
contributions, that totaled $1.1 million,
$0.8 million, and $0.6 million in 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively. The Companys 401(k) plan does not
currently allow employees to invest in securities of the
Company. Effective February 1, 2007, the Company increased
the percentage of employee contributions that will be matched.
During 2000, the Board and stockholders approved the 2000
Incentive Stock Plan (the Plan). The Plan was
amended and restated effective March 18, 2004. The purpose
of the Plan is to attract, motivate, and retain selected
employees of the Company and to provide the Company with the
ability to provide incentives more directly linked to the
profitability of the business and increases in shareholder
value. All directors and full-time regular employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to be
granted awards under the Plan. The total number of shares of
common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the Plan is
4,500,000. As of December 31, 2006, there were
1,307,467 shares available for issuance under the Plan.
Shares delivered or withheld for payment of the exercise price
of an option, shares withheld for payment of tax withholding, or
shares subject to options or other awards which expire or are
terminated and restricted shares that are forfeited will again
become available for issuance under the Plan. The Plan provides
for the granting of cash awards, incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and stock
appreciation rights at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee of the Board. The Board has also created a Restricted
Stock Award Committee having Jon S. Brumley, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and President, as its sole member. The
Restricted Stock Award Committee may grant certain awards of
restricted stock to non-executive employees at its discretion.
The Plan contains the following individual limits:
|
|
|
|
|
an employee may not be granted awards covering or relating to
more than 225,000 shares of common stock in any calendar
year; |
|
|
|
a non-employee director may not be granted awards covering or
relating to more than 15,000 shares of common stock in any
calendar year; and |
|
|
|
an employee may not receive awards consisting of cash (including
cash awards that are granted as performance awards) in respect
of any calendar year having a value determined on the grant date
in excess of $1.0 million. |
All options that have been granted under the Plan have a strike
price equal to the fair market value of the Companys
common stock on the date of grant. Additionally, all options
have a ten-year life and vest equally over a three-year period.
Restricted stock granted under the Plan vests over varying
periods from one to five years, subject to performance-based
vesting for certain members of senior management.
Adoption of SFAS 123R. As previously discussed, on
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R eliminates the option of using
the intrinsic value method of accounting previously available,
and requires companies to recognize in the financial statements
the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of
equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of those
awards.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R using the
modified prospective method, under which
compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements for
(i) share-based awards granted after
92
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
January 1, 2006 based on the requirements of
SFAS 123R, and (ii) all unvested awards granted prior
to January 1, 2006 based on criteria established in
SFAS 123. As a result, the Company did not record a
cumulative effect of accounting change related to the adoption.
Under SFAS 123R, equity instruments are not considered
issued until all vesting conditions lapse. This differs from
APB 25, which required the recording of restricted stock to
equity with an off-setting contra-equity account which was
amortized to expense over the vesting period. Because unvested
restricted stock is no longer considered issued, the
contra-equity account, Deferred compensation, is no
longer reported as a separate component of stockholders
equity. Certain equity balances as originally reported in the
Companys 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K have
been retroactively restated to reflect the change. The following
table summarizes the balances at December 31, 2005 as
originally reported and as restated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
As Originally | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
As Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
49,368 |
|
|
|
48,785 |
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
$ |
325,620 |
|
|
$ |
316,619 |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
$ |
(9,007 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
546,781 |
|
|
$ |
546,781 |
|
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, the Companys
income before income taxes and net income for 2006 are
$1.7 million and $1.2 million lower, respectively,
than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation
under APB 25. Basic and diluted EPS for 2006 are each
$0.02 per share lower than if the Company had continued to
account for share-based compensation under APB 25.
The compensation cost and income tax benefit related to the Plan
that has been recorded in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations for 2006 was $9.0 million and
$3.2 million, respectively. During 2006, the Company also
capitalized $1.1 million of stock-based compensation cost
as a component of Properties and equipment in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Stock-based
compensation expense has been allocated to lease operations
expense, general and administrative expense, and exploration
expense based on the allocation of the respective cash
compensation.
Stock Options. The fair value of each option award
granted during 2006, 2005, and 2004 was estimated on the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model based on the
assumptions noted in the following table. The expected
volatility is based on a combination of the historical
volatility of the Companys stock and the historical stock
volatility of certain peer companies for a period of time
commensurate with the expected term of the award. For options
granted in 2006, the Company used the simplified
method prescribed by SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 to estimate the expected term of the
options, which is calculated as the average midpoint between
each vesting date and the life of the option. The risk-free rate
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant for periods commensurate with the expected terms
of the options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
46.0 |
% |
|
|
34.8 |
% |
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
93
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the changes in the number of
outstanding options and their related weighted average strike
prices during 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Strike Price | |
|
Term | |
|
Value | |
|
Options | |
|
Strike Price | |
|
Options | |
|
Strike Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,440,812 |
|
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,520,586 |
|
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
1,444,431 |
|
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
Granted(a)
|
|
|
122,890 |
|
|
|
31.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,255 |
|
|
|
26.55 |
|
|
|
389,784 |
|
|
|
17.42 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(48,410 |
) |
|
|
24.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,616 |
) |
|
|
17.94 |
|
|
|
(9,764 |
) |
|
|
10.49 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(178,174 |
) |
|
|
13.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,413 |
) |
|
|
9.07 |
|
|
|
(303,865 |
) |
|
|
9.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
1,337,118 |
|
|
|
14.44 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
14,353 |
|
|
|
1,440,812 |
|
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
|
1,520,586 |
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
1,076,815 |
|
|
|
11.90 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
13,662 |
|
|
|
1,089,677 |
|
|
|
11.04 |
|
|
|
948,771 |
|
|
|
9.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
During 2004, there were 37,500 stock options granted to
non-employee directors. |
The weighted average fair value per share of individual options
granted during 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $14.96, $12.99, and
$6.87, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $2.4 million,
$2.6 million, and $3.1 million, respectively. During
2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company received proceeds from the
exercise of stock options of $2.3 million,
$1.5 million, and $2.8 million, respectively, and
realized tax benefits related to the exercises of
$0.9 million, $0.5 million, and $0.7 million,
respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Company had
$1.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
Additional information about common stock options outstanding
and exercisable at December 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
Range of Strike | |
|
Options | |
|
Life | |
|
Strike | |
|
Options | |
Year of Grant |
|
Prices Per Share | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
(Years) | |
|
Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2001
|
|
|
$8.33 to $9.33 |
|
|
|
482,325 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
|
|
482,325 |
|
2002
|
|
|
$8.50 to $12.40 |
|
|
|
332,903 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
11.65 |
|
|
|
332,903 |
|
2003
|
|
|
$11.49 to $13.61 |
|
|
|
41,289 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
12.46 |
|
|
|
41,289 |
|
2004
|
|
|
$17.17 to $19.77 |
|
|
|
290,195 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
17.51 |
|
|
|
191,807 |
|
2005
|
|
|
$26.55 |
|
|
|
84,931 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
26.55 |
|
|
|
28,491 |
|
2006
|
|
|
$31.10 |
|
|
|
105,475 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
31.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337,118 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
14.44 |
|
|
|
1,076,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, Encore issued 205,936
stock options to employees as part of the Companys annual
incentive program.
Restricted Stock. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the
Company recognized expense related to restricted stock of
$8.1 million, $4.0 million, and $1.8 million,
respectively, and realized tax benefits related thereto of
$0.4 million, $0.9 million, and $0.7 million,
respectively. A summary of the status of the
94
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Companys unvested restricted stock outstanding as of
December 31, 2006, and changes during the year then ended,
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
583,274 |
|
|
$ |
20.53 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
428,609 |
|
|
|
31.17 |
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(101,377 |
) |
|
|
15.49 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(81,887 |
) |
|
|
25.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
828,619 |
|
|
|
26.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company issued 277,162,
130,854, and 102,106 shares, respectively, of restricted
stock to employees which depend only on continued employment for
vesting. The following table illustrates by year of grant the
vesting of shares which remain outstanding at December 31,
2006 which depend only on continued employment for vesting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Vesting | |
|
|
| |
Year of Grant |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2002
|
|
|
48,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,275 |
|
2003
|
|
|
19,080 |
|
|
|
19,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,160 |
|
2004
|
|
|
55,039 |
|
|
|
26,582 |
|
|
|
26,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,203 |
|
2005
|
|
|
5,508 |
|
|
|
82,206 |
|
|
|
76,698 |
|
|
|
76,698 |
|
|
|
241,110 |
|
2006
|
|
|
34,935 |
|
|
|
34,935 |
|
|
|
153,338 |
|
|
|
34,935 |
|
|
|
258,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
162,837 |
|
|
|
162,803 |
|
|
|
256,618 |
|
|
|
111,633 |
|
|
|
693,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company issued 151,447,
155,190, and 86,537 shares of restricted stock to employees
that not only depend on the passage of time and continued
employment, but on certain performance measures, for their
vesting. The performance measures related to the 2004 and 2005
awards were met and therefore, vesting depends only on the
passage of time and therefore, were included in the table above.
The following table illustrates the vesting of shares which
remain outstanding at December 31, 2006 that not only
depend on the passage of time and continued employment, but on
certain performance measures, assuming the performance measures
are met, for their vesting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Vesting | |
|
|
| |
Year of Grant |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
134,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
33,682 |
|
|
|
134,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the performance measures
related to the 2006 awards were met and therefore, vesting
depends only on the passage of time.
As of December 31, 2006, there was $10.5 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested,
outstanding restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 2.8 years. During 2006
and 2005, there were 101,377 and 81,883, respectively, that
vested. Employees elected to satisfy minimum tax withholding
obligations related to the vested restricted stock by allowing
the Company to withhold 24,362 and 18,298 shares of common
stock during 2006 and 2005, respectively. These shares are
treated as treasury stock by the Company and have been reflected
in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements
of Cash Flows as such.
95
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, Encore issued
319,012 shares of restricted stock to employees as part of
the Companys annual incentive compensation program.
Note 13. Financial
Instruments
The following table sets forth the book value and estimated fair
value of the Companys financial instruments as of the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Book Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Book Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
81,470 |
|
|
|
81,470 |
|
|
|
76,960 |
|
|
|
76,960 |
|
Plugging bond
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
Bell Creek escrow
|
|
|
4,887 |
|
|
|
4,902 |
|
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(18,204 |
) |
|
|
(18,204 |
) |
|
|
(27,281 |
) |
|
|
(27,281 |
) |
61/4% Notes
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
(140,625 |
) |
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
(145,500 |
) |
6% Notes
|
|
|
(295,108 |
) |
|
|
(275,250 |
) |
|
|
(294,683 |
) |
|
|
(279,000 |
) |
71/4% Notes
|
|
|
(148,588 |
) |
|
|
(145,500 |
) |
|
|
(148,506 |
) |
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(68,000 |
) |
|
|
(68,000 |
) |
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
Commodity derivative contracts
|
|
|
13,599 |
|
|
|
13,599 |
|
|
|
(86,794 |
) |
|
|
(86,794 |
) |
Deferred premiums on derivative contracts
|
|
|
(54,671 |
) |
|
|
(54,671 |
) |
|
|
(30,141 |
) |
|
|
(30,141 |
) |
The fair values of senior subordinated notes were determined
using open market quotes as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The difference between book value and fair value represents the
premium or discount on that date. The book value of the
revolving credit facility approximates the fair value as the
interest rate is variable. The plugging bond and Bell Creek
escrow are included in Other assets on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets and are classified as
held to maturity and therefore, are recorded at
amortized cost, which at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was
less than fair value. Commodity contracts are
marked-to-market each
quarter in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 133.
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company manages commodity price risk with swap contracts,
put contracts, collars and floor spreads. Swap contracts provide
a fixed price for a notional amount of volume. Put contracts
provide a fixed floor price on a notional amount of volume while
allowing full price participation if the relevant index price
closes above the floor price. Collar contracts provide a floor
price for a notional amount of volume while allowing some
additional price participation if the relevant index price
closes above the floor price. Additionally, the Company
occasionally sells put contracts with a strike price well below
the floor price of an existing or new floor. Combined, the short
floor and long floor are called a floor spread.
The Company had $54.7 million of deferred premiums payable
recorded at December 31, 2006, of which $30.4 million
is considered long-term and is recorded in Derivative
liabilities in the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The premiums relate to various oil and natural gas floor
contracts and are payable on a monthly basis from January 2007
to January 2010. The Company recorded these amounts at their net
present value at the time the contract was entered into and
accretes them up to their eventual settlement price by recording
interest expense each period.
Commodity Contracts
Mark-to-Market
Accounting: Previously designated as hedges. Prior to July
2006, the Company used hedge accounting for certain of its
derivative contracts, whereby the
96
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
effective portion of changes in the fair value of the contract
was deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss
(AOCL) included in stockholders equity in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets rather than recognized
in current period earnings. During July 2006, the Company
elected to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively for all
commodity derivatives which were previously accounted for as
hedges. While this change has no effect on cash flows, results
of operations are affected by
mark-to-market gains
and losses, which fluctuate with the swings in oil and natural
gas prices. At the point of dedesignation, the gains and losses
to be amortized to oil and natural gas revenues as effective
hedges were established and deferred in AOCL. The amortization
of these amounts is included in oil and natural gas revenues
with the revenues from the hedged production. All
mark-to-market gains
and losses from July 2006 forward are recognized in earnings
through Derivative fair value (gain) loss in
the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations rather
than deferring such amounts in AOCL.
The following tables summarize the Companys open commodity
derivative instruments as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
Oil Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Floor | |
|
Floor | |
|
Short Floor | |
|
Short Floor | |
|
Swap | |
|
Swap | |
|
Fair | |
Period |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Market Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Bbl) | |
|
(Per Bbl) | |
|
(Bbl) | |
|
(Per Bbl) | |
|
(Bbl) | |
|
(Per Bbl) | |
|
(In thousands) | |
Jan. Dec. 2007
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
53.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
$ |
(26,347 |
) |
Jan. June 2008
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
64.17 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
58.59 |
|
|
|
9,536 |
|
July Dec. 2008
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
66.25 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
Jan. Dec. 2009
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
Daily | |
|
Average |
|
Daily | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Floor | |
|
Floor | |
|
Short Floor | |
|
Short Floor |
|
Swap | |
|
Swap | |
|
Fair | |
Period |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Volume | |
|
Price |
|
Volume | |
|
Price | |
|
Market Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Mcf) | |
|
(Per Mcf) | |
|
(Mcf) | |
|
(Per Mcf) |
|
(Mcf) | |
|
(Per Mcf) | |
|
(In thousands) | |
Jan. Dec. 2007
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
6.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.99 |
|
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
Jan. Dec. 2008
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Contracts
Mark-to-Market
Accounting: Floor Spreads. In order to partially finance the
cost of premiums on certain purchased floors, the Company may
sell floors with a strike price below the strike price of the
purchased floor. Together the two floors, known as a floor
spread or put spread, have a lower premium cost than a
traditional floor contract but provide price protection only
down to the strike price of the short floor. During 2006, the
Company entered into floor spreads with a $70 per Bbl
purchased floor and a $50 per Bbl short floor for
4,000 Bbls per day in 2008 and 5,000 Bbls per day in
2009. As with the Companys other derivative contracts,
these are
marked-to-market each
quarter through Derivative fair value (gain) loss in
the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the
above table, the purchased floor component of these floor
spreads has been included with the Companys other floor
contracts and the short floor component is shown separately as
negative volumes. The net cash flows per Bbl upon settlement of
the contracts and payment of the related premiums when viewed
together change depending on the New York Mercantile Exchange
(NYMEX) oil price as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
When the NYMEX oil price is greater than $70 per Bbl, the
Company pays the net purchased floor premium cost per Bbl. |
97
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
When the NYMEX oil price is greater than $50 per Bbl but
less than $70 per Bbl, the Company receives settlements of
$70 per Bbl less the NYMEX oil price and pays the net
purchased floor premium cost per Bbl. |
|
|
|
When the NYMEX oil price is below $50 per Bbl, the Company
receives $20 per Bbl less the net purchased floor premium
cost per Bbl. |
Commodity Contracts Current Period Impact. As
a result of derivative transactions for oil and natural gas, the
Company recognized a pre-tax reduction in oil and natural gas
revenues of approximately $60.3 million,
$59.3 million, and $38.0 million in 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively. The Company also recognized in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations derivative
fair value gains and losses related to (i) changes in the
market value since the date of dedesignation of derivative
contracts which were previously designated as hedges,
(ii) changes in the market value of certain other commodity
derivatives that were never designated as hedges,
(iii) settlements on derivative contracts not designated as
hedges, and (iv) ineffectiveness of derivative contracts
designated as hedges prior to July 2006. The following table
summarizes the components of derivative fair value gains and
losses for 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Designated cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffectiveness Derivative commodity contracts
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
$ |
8,371 |
|
|
$ |
5,018 |
|
Undesignated derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market loss (gain):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
(17,279 |
) |
|
|
(2,050 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
Settlements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value loss (gain)
|
|
$ |
(24,388 |
) |
|
$ |
5,290 |
|
|
$ |
5,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Contracts Future Period Impact. The
components of AOCL consisted of the following as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Deferred loss on commodity derivatives, net of tax
|
|
$ |
(35,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,918 |
) |
Deferred gain on interest rate swap, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(35,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2007, the Company expects to reclassify $53.6 million of
deferred losses associated with its dedesignated commodity
contracts from AOCL to oil and natural gas revenues. The
remaining pretax amount of AOCL will be reclassified to oil and
natural gas revenues in 2008. The Company also expects to
reclassify approximately $20.0 million of net deferred
income tax benefits during 2007 from AOCL to income tax benefit.
Counterparty Risk. Encores counterparties to
commodity derivative contracts include: Bank of America,
BNP Paribas, BP Corporation, Calyon, Deutsche Bank,
J. Aron & Company, Morgan Stanley,
98
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and Wachovia. At December 31, 2006, the Company had
committed greater than 10 percent of either its outstanding
oil contracts or natural gas contracts to the following
counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Hedged Oil | |
|
Hedged Natural Gas | |
Counterparty |
|
Production Committed | |
|
Production Committed | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
BNP Paribas
|
|
|
7.6% |
|
|
|
66.6% |
|
Calyon
|
|
|
17.0% |
|
|
|
14.3% |
|
Deutsche Bank
|
|
|
34.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Aron & Company
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
19.0% |
|
Wachovia
|
|
|
22.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance on all contracts with J. Aron &
Company are guaranteed by its parent, Goldman Sachs &
Co. The Company feels the credit-worthiness of the current
counterparties is sound and the Company does not anticipate any
non-performance of contractual obligations. As long as each
counterparty maintains an investment grade credit rating,
pursuant to Encores hedging contracts, no collateral is
required.
In order to mitigate the credit risk of financial instruments,
the Company enters into master netting agreements with
significant counterparties. The master netting agreement is a
standardized, bilateral contract between a given counterparty
and the Company. Instead of treating separately each financial
transaction between the counterparty and the Company, the master
netting agreement enables Encores counterparty and the
Company to aggregate all financial trades and treat them as a
single agreement. This arrangement benefits the Company in three
ways. First, the netting of the value of all trades reduces the
requirements of daily collateral posting by Encore. Second,
default by counterparty under one financial trade can trigger
rights to terminate all financial trades with such counterparty.
Third, netting of settlement amounts reduces the Companys
credit exposure to a given counterparty in the event of
close-out.
Note 14. Related Party
Transactions
The Company paid $3.3 million, $1.0 million, and
$0.3 million to affiliates of Hanover Compressor Company
(Hanover) in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, for
compressors and field compression services. Mr. I. Jon
Brumley, the Companys Chairman of the Board, also serves
as a director of Hanover.
The Company paid $0.4 million, $0.4 million, and
$0.2 million to affiliates of Kinder Morgan, Inc.
(Kinder Morgan) in 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively, for its portion of production costs of certain
non-operated wells. Mr. Ted A. Gardner, a member of
the Companys Board, also serves as a director of Kinder
Morgan.
Note 15. Subsequent
Events
On January 16, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase
and sale agreement to acquire oil and natural gas producing
properties and related assets in the Big Horn Basin from certain
subsidiaries of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
(Anadarko), for a purchase price of
$400 million, subject to customary purchase price
adjustments and closing conditions. The properties are comprised
of the Elk Basin Unit and the Gooseberry Unit in Park County,
Wyoming. The Big Horn Basin properties currently produce
approximately 4 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day
(MBOE/ D) net with an additional 350 BOE/ D net of
natural gas liquids produced by the Elk Basin Gas Plant. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company purchased put
contracts on approximately two-thirds of the acquisitions
99
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expected production volumes at $65.00 per Bbl for the
remainder of 2007 and all of 2008. The Big Horn Basin
acquisition is expected to close in March 2007.
On January 23, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase
and sale agreement to acquire oil and natural gas producing
properties in the Williston Basin from certain subsidiaries of
Anadarko for a purchase price of $410 million, subject to
customary purchase price adjustments and closing conditions. The
properties are comprised of 50 different fields across Montana
and North Dakota. As part of this acquisition, the Company is
also acquiring approximately 70,000 net acres and 800 BOE/ D of
production in the Bakken play in Montana and North Dakota. The
Williston Basin properties currently produce approximately
5 MBOE/ D net, will be 85 percent operated by Encore.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company purchased put
contracts on approximately 80 percent of the
acquisitions expected production volumes at an average
price of $57.50 per Bbl for the remainder of 2007 and all
of 2008. The Williston Basin acquisition is expected to close in
April 2007.
Encore intends to finance the combined acquisitions through cash
flows from operations and borrowings under one or more credit
facilities.
|
|
|
Master Limited Partnership (MLP) |
On January 17, 2007, the Company announced an intention to
form a master limited partnership (MLP) that will
engage in an initial public offering of common units
representing limited partner interests. The MLP is expected to
own certain Big Horn Basin properties to be acquired from
certain subsidiaries of Anadarko and certain of the
Companys legacy oil and gas properties. The Company
expects that a registration statement on
Form S-1 for the
MLP will be filed with the SEC in the second quarter of 2007
with respect to an offering of units representing limited
partnership interests in the MLP. Any sale of securities in the
MLP would be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, and
such units would only be offered and sold by means of a
prospectus. This Report does not constitute an offer to sell or
the solicitation of any offer to buy any securities of the MLP,
and there will not be any sale of any such securities in any
state in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be
unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the
securities laws of such state.
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
As a result of the proposed acquisitions from Anadarko, the
Company expects to enter into a new $1.25 billion five-year
revolving credit facility in March 2007 with a $650 million
initial borrowing base that will increase to $950 million
upon completion of the Williston Basin acquisition, which is
currently scheduled for April 2007. The Company also expects
that one of its subsidiaries will enter into a $300 million
five-year revolving credit facility in March 2007 with a
$115 million borrowing base and a $10 million
overadvance feature, which will be non-recourse to the Company.
100
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Capitalized Costs and Costs Incurred Relating to Oil and
Natural Gas Producing Activities
The capitalized cost of oil and natural gas properties was as
follows as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Properties and equipment, at cost successful efforts
method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
$ |
2,033,914 |
|
|
$ |
1,691,175 |
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
47,548 |
|
|
|
37,646 |
|
|
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
|
|
(364,780 |
) |
|
|
(255,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,716,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,473,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes costs incurred related to oil and
natural gas properties for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
$ |
224,469 |
|
|
$ |
204,907 |
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
24,462 |
|
|
|
21,205 |
|
|
|
33,926 |
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisitions
|
|
|
29,733 |
|
|
|
247,895 |
|
|
|
239,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling and exploitation
|
|
|
253,484 |
|
|
|
268,520 |
|
|
|
157,092 |
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development
|
|
|
253,631 |
|
|
|
269,474 |
|
|
|
157,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling and exploitation
|
|
|
92,839 |
|
|
|
53,316 |
|
|
|
29,363 |
|
|
Geological and seismic
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
Delay rentals
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exploration
|
|
|
95,205 |
|
|
|
57,046 |
|
|
|
30,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred
|
|
$ |
378,569 |
|
|
$ |
574,415 |
|
|
$ |
428,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Natural Gas Producing
Activities Unaudited
The estimates of the Companys proved oil and natural gas
reserves, which are located entirely within the United States,
were prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the
SEC and the FASB. Proved oil and natural gas reserve quantities
are based on estimates prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd., who
are independent petroleum engineers.
Future prices received for production and future production
costs may vary, perhaps significantly, from the prices and costs
assumed for purposes of these estimates. There can be no
assurance that the proved reserves will be developed within the
periods assumed or that prices and costs will remain constant.
Actual production may not equal the estimated amounts used in
the preparation of reserve projections. In accordance with SEC
guidelines, the Companys estimates of future net cash
flows from the properties and
101
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)
the representative value thereof are made using oil and natural
gas prices in effect as of the dates of such estimates and are
held constant throughout the life of the properties. Year-end
prices used in estimating net cash flows were as follows as of
the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
61.06 |
|
|
$ |
61.04 |
|
|
$ |
43.46 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
9.44 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
The Companys reserve and production quantities from the
CCA properties have been reduced by the amounts attributable to
the net profits interest. The net profits interest on the
Companys CCA properties has been deducted from future cash
inflows in the calculation of Standardized Measure. In addition,
net future cash inflows have not been adjusted for hedge
positions outstanding at the end of the year. The future cash
flows are reduced by estimated production costs and development
costs, which are based on year-end economic conditions and held
constant throughout the life of the properties, and by the
estimated effect of future income taxes. Future income taxes are
based on statutory income tax rates in effect at year-end, the
Companys tax basis in its proved oil and natural gas
properties, and the effect of net operating loss, alternative
minimum tax, and Section 43 tax credits.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating
quantities of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of
production and timing of development expenditures. Oil and
natural gas reserve engineering is and must be recognized as a
subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of
oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in any exact way,
and estimates of other engineers might differ materially from
those included in this Report. The accuracy of any reserve
estimate is a function of the quality of available data and
engineering, and estimates may justify revisions. Accordingly,
reserve estimates are often materially different from the
quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.
Reserve estimates are integral to managements analysis of
impairments of oil and natural gas properties and the
calculation of DD&A on these properties.
Estimated net quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves
of the Company were as follows as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
153,434 |
|
|
|
148,387 |
|
|
|
134,048 |
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
306,764 |
|
|
|
283,865 |
|
|
|
234,030 |
|
|
Combined (MBOE)
|
|
|
204,561 |
|
|
|
195,698 |
|
|
|
173,053 |
|
Proved developed reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
94,246 |
|
|
|
101,505 |
|
|
|
97,114 |
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
235,049 |
|
|
|
229,950 |
|
|
|
156,919 |
|
|
Combined (MBOE)
|
|
|
133,421 |
|
|
|
139,830 |
|
|
|
123,267 |
|
Encore is committed to sell at least 4,500 Bbls of oil per
day at a floating market price through 2009.
102
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)
The changes in proved reserves were as follows for 2006, 2005,
and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural | |
|
Oil | |
|
|
Oil | |
|
Gas | |
|
Equivalent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(MBbl) | |
|
(MMcf) | |
|
(MBOE) | |
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
117,732 |
|
|
|
138,950 |
|
|
|
140,890 |
|
|
Acquisitions of minerals-in-place
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
86,314 |
|
|
|
22,239 |
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
27,248 |
|
|
|
8,768 |
|
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
11,826 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
11,812 |
|
|
Revisions of estimates
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(4,313 |
) |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
Production
|
|
|
(6,679 |
) |
|
|
(14,089 |
) |
|
|
(9,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
134,048 |
|
|
|
234,030 |
|
|
|
173,053 |
|
|
Acquisitions of minerals-in-place
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
38,781 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
28,073 |
|
|
|
7,459 |
|
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
11,510 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
11,699 |
|
|
Revisions of estimates
|
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
Production
|
|
|
(6,871 |
) |
|
|
(21,059 |
) |
|
|
(10,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
148,387 |
|
|
|
283,865 |
|
|
|
195,698 |
|
|
Acquisitions of minerals-in-place
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
78,861 |
|
|
|
16,412 |
|
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
11,092 |
|
|
Revisions of estimates
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
(33,682 |
) |
|
|
(7,461 |
) |
|
Production
|
|
|
(7,335 |
) |
|
|
(23,456 |
) |
|
|
(11,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
153,434 |
|
|
|
306,764 |
|
|
|
204,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Standardized Measure of discounted estimated future net cash
flows related to proved oil and natural gas reserves was as
follows as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net future cash inflows
|
|
$ |
9,291,007 |
|
|
$ |
10,414,091 |
|
|
$ |
6,651,858 |
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(3,668,897 |
) |
|
|
(3,690,974 |
) |
|
|
(2,389,359 |
) |
Future development costs
|
|
|
(371,396 |
) |
|
|
(250,554 |
) |
|
|
(194,746 |
) |
Future abandonment costs
|
|
|
(134,103 |
) |
|
|
(121,553 |
) |
|
|
(49,859 |
) |
Future income tax expense
|
|
|
(1,499,290 |
) |
|
|
(1,934,504 |
) |
|
|
(1,221,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
3,617,321 |
|
|
|
4,416,506 |
|
|
|
2,795,961 |
|
10% annual discount
|
|
|
(2,155,514 |
) |
|
|
(2,498,035 |
) |
|
|
(1,630,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash
flows
|
|
$ |
1,461,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,918,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)
The primary changes in the Standardized Measure of discounted
estimated future net cash flows were as follows for 2006, 2005,
and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Standardized measure, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
1,918,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,619 |
|
|
$ |
736,939 |
|
|
Net change in sales price and production costs
|
|
|
(634,033 |
) |
|
|
531,793 |
|
|
|
430,310 |
|
|
Acquisitions of mineral-in-place
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
256,257 |
|
|
|
242,855 |
|
|
Extensions, discoveries, and improved recovery
|
|
|
141,211 |
|
|
|
229,929 |
|
|
|
150,112 |
|
|
Revisions of quantity estimates
|
|
|
(62,615 |
) |
|
|
(15,455 |
) |
|
|
(15,217 |
) |
|
Sales, net of production costs
|
|
|
(340,036 |
) |
|
|
(357,028 |
) |
|
|
(222,995 |
) |
|
Development costs incurred during the year
|
|
|
253,484 |
|
|
|
268,520 |
|
|
|
157,092 |
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
191,847 |
|
|
|
116,562 |
|
|
|
73,694 |
|
|
Change in estimated future development costs
|
|
|
(185,212 |
) |
|
|
(199,158 |
) |
|
|
(276,027 |
) |
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
248,491 |
|
|
|
(247,937 |
) |
|
|
(145,042 |
) |
|
Change in timing and other
|
|
|
(70,340 |
) |
|
|
169,369 |
|
|
|
33,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure, end of year
|
|
$ |
1,461,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,918,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data
for 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, as reported
|
|
$ |
116,216 |
|
|
$ |
133,471 |
|
|
$ |
177,697 |
|
|
$ |
157,710 |
|
|
Plus: change in marketing presentation
|
|
|
31,746 |
|
|
|
24,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, as restated
|
|
$ |
147,962 |
|
|
$ |
157,493 |
|
|
$ |
177,697 |
|
|
$ |
157,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
40,846 |
|
|
$ |
47,594 |
|
|
$ |
78,002 |
|
|
$ |
25,064 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
17,936 |
|
|
$ |
22,235 |
|
|
$ |
42,135 |
|
|
$ |
10,092 |
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
91,581 |
|
|
$ |
99,717 |
|
|
$ |
127,572 |
|
|
$ |
138,454 |
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
39,917 |
|
|
$ |
43,401 |
|
|
$ |
38,911 |
|
|
$ |
68,160 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
21,784 |
|
|
$ |
23,668 |
|
|
$ |
20,854 |
|
|
$ |
37,119 |
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company reclassified the
net gain/loss from the purchases and sales of third party oil
volumes from Oil Revenues to Oil Marketing Revenues and Oil
Marketing Expense and reclassified the related marketing
transportation costs from Other Operating Expense to Oil
Marketing Expense in the Companys Consolidated Statements
of Operations for the first and second quarters of 2006. These
are changes in presentation only and do not affect previously
reported net income or earnings per share for either period.
104
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded
that, as of December 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in applicable rules and forms.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
The Companys management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. The Companys internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
Companys financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
As of December 31, 2006, management assessed the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal
control over financial reporting established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework, issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on that assessment, management determined that
the Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on those criteria.
Ernst & Young, LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial
statements of the Company included in this Annual report on
Form 10-K, has
issued an attestation report on managements assessment of
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. The report,
which expresses unqualified opinions on managements
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, is included below under the heading
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
105
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Encore Acquisition Company:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that
Encore Acquisition Company (the Company) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
criteria). The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Encore
Acquisition Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria.
Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 28,
2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Fort Worth, Texas
February 28, 2007
106
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE |
The information required in response to this item will be set
forth in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covering
our directors, officers, and employees, which is available free
of charge on our Internet website (www.encoreacq.com). We
will post on our web site any amendments to the Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics for directors and executive officers.
|
|
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required in response to this item will be set
forth in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required in response to this item will be set
forth in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table sets forth information about our common
stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Securities to Be | |
|
|
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Issued upon Exercise | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
of Outstanding | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
(Excluding | |
|
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Securities Reflected | |
|
|
and Rights(2) | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
in Column(a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
1,337,118 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
|
1,307,467 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,337,118 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
|
1,307,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The 2000 Incentive Stock Plan is the Companys only equity
compensation plan. |
|
(2) |
Excludes 828,919 shares of restricted stock. |
107
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required in response to this item will be set
forth in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
FEES AND SERVICES
The information required in response to this item will be set
forth in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL
STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
69 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
70 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
|
|
|
71 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
|
|
|
72 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
|
|
|
73 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules: |
|
|
|
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they
are not applicable or the required information is presented in
the financial statements or the notes to the consolidated
financial statements. |
(b) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on the following page for a description of
the exhibits filed as a part of this Report.
108
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 16, 2007 among
Clear Fork Pipeline Company, Howell Petroleum Corporation,
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP, and the Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on January 17, 2007). |
|
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 23, 2007 among
Howell Petroleum Corporation and Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas
Onshore LP, as Sellers, and the Company, as Purchaser
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on January 26, 2007). |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company (incorporated by reference to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2001, filed with the SEC on November 7,
2001). |
|
3 |
.1.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by
reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005,
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005). |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated
by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2001, filed with the SEC on November 7, 2001). |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen certificate of the Company (incorporated by referenced
to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1,
Registration No. 333-47540, filed with the SEC on
December 15, 2000). |
|
|
4 |
.2.1 |
|
Indenture, dated as of April 2, 2004, among the Company,
the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, with respect to the 6.25% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-117025) filed with the
SEC on June 30, 2004). |
|
|
4 |
.2.2 |
|
Form of 6.25% Senior Subordinated Note to Cede &
Co. or its registered assigns (included as Exhibit A to
Exhibit 4.2.1 above). |
|
|
4 |
.3.1 |
|
Indenture, dated as of July 13, 2005, among the Company,
the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, with respect to the 6% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 14, 2005). |
|
|
4 |
.3.2 |
|
Form of 6% Senior Subordinated Note due 2015 (included as
Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.3.1 above). |
|
|
4 |
.4.1 |
|
Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2005, among the
Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association with respect to Subordinated Debt
Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on November 23, 2005). |
|
|
4 |
.4.2 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16,
2005, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, with respect to the
71/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2017 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 23, 2005). |
|
|
4 |
.4.3 |
|
Form of
71/4% Senior
Subordinated Note due 2017 (included as Exhibit A to
Exhibit 4.4.2 above). |
|
|
10 |
.1+ |
|
2000 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-120422), filed with the SEC on
November 12, 2004). |
109
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.2+ |
|
Employee Severance Protection Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003, filed with the SEC on May 8, 2003). |
|
|
10 |
.3+ |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Executive
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005). |
|
|
10 |
.4+ |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonqualified) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005). |
|
|
10 |
.5+ |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Incentive) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005). |
|
|
10 |
.6+ |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive
officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Companys 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004). |
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Management Directors
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
February 22, 2006). |
|
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 19,
2004, among the Company, Encore Operating, L.P., Bank of
America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Fotis Capital Corp. and
Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, BNP Paribas and
Citibank, N.A., as Co-Documentary Agents and the financial
institutions party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 25, 2004). |
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated April 29, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on May 4, 2005). |
|
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated November 14,
2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on November 18, 2005). |
|
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated December 29,
2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on January 5, 2006). |
|
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 18, 1998, by
and among the Company and the other parties thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-47540), filed with the SEC on October 6, 2000). |
|
|
12 |
.1* |
|
Statement showing computation of ratios of earnings to fixed
charges. |
|
|
21 |
.1* |
|
Subsidiaries of the Company as of February 1, 2007. |
|
|
23 |
.1* |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
23 |
.2* |
|
Consent of Miller and Lents, Ltd. |
|
|
24 |
.1* |
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page of this
report). |
|
|
31 |
.1* |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Executive
Officer). |
|
|
31 |
.2* |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Financial
Officer). |
|
32 |
.1* |
|
Section 1350 Certification (Principal Executive Officer). |
|
32 |
.2* |
|
Section 1350 Certification (Principal Financial Officer). |
+ Management contract or compensatory plan, contract, or
arrangement
110
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Encore Acquisition Company |
|
|
|
Date: February 28, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ Jon S.
Brumley
Jon
S. Brumley
Chief Executive Officer |
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jon S. Brumley
and Robert C. Reeves, and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents with full power of substitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this report,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all
documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact
and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or his or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title or Capacity |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Jon Brumley
I.
Jon Brumley |
|
Chairman of the Board and Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ Jon S. Brumley
Jon
S. Brumley |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ Robert C. Reeves
Robert
C. Reeves |
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ John A. Bailey
John
A. Bailey |
|
Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ Martin C. Bowen
Martin
C. Bowen |
|
Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ Ted
Collins, Jr.
Ted
Collins, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ Ted A. Gardner
Ted
A. Gardner |
|
Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
111
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title or Capacity |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John V. Genova
John
V. Genova |
|
Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
/s/ James A.
Winne III
James
A. Winne III |
|
Director |
|
February 28, 2007 |
112