e424b3
Filed
Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No.
333-176641
PROPOSED MERGER TRANSACTION
Dear Shareholders of OceanFreight Inc.:
I am pleased to inform you that OceanFreight Inc., or
OceanFreight, and DryShips Inc., or DryShips, have entered into
an agreement and plan of merger, or the merger agreement,
pursuant to which DryShips will acquire all of the outstanding
shares of OceanFreight Class A common stock, or
OceanFreight common stock. If the merger is completed,
OceanFreight will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips
and you will be entitled to receive $11.25 in cash and
0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock for each of your
shares of OceanFreight common stock.
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of our
shareholders, or the special meeting, which will be held at
OceanFreights offices located at 80 Kifissias Avenue, GR
151 25, Amaroussion, Athens, Greece, on November 3, 2011,
at 10:00 a.m. local time, to vote on the approval of the
merger agreement. As described in the accompanying proxy
statement / prospectus, a special committee of
independent directors established by the OceanFreight board of
directors, or the OceanFreight Special Committee, and the
OceanFreight board of directors have each unanimously approved
the merger agreement and declared that the merger, the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are in the
best interests of OceanFreights shareholders. The
OceanFreight Special Committee and the OceanFreight board of
directors each unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the adoption and approval of the
merger agreement.
OceanFreight cannot complete the merger unless
OceanFreights shareholders holding a majority of the
outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock approve the
merger agreement.
The notice of special meeting and the proxy
statement / prospectus that accompany this letter
provide you with extensive information about the merger
agreement, the merger and the special meeting. We encourage you
to read these materials carefully, including the section in the
proxy statement / prospectus entitled Risk
Factors beginning on page 29 of the proxy
statement / prospectus.
Approximately 50.5% of the outstanding shares of OceanFreight
common stock, which were held by certain entities controlled by
our Chief Executive Officer, Antonis Kandylidis, were purchased
by DryShips on August 24, 2011 for $11.25 in cash and
0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock for each share of
OceanFreight common stock pursuant to a separate purchase
agreement approved by the OceanFreight Special Committee and the
OceanFreight board of directors. DryShips has committed to vote
those shares in favor of the approval of the merger agreement.
Accordingly, approval of the merger agreement is assured.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the
special meeting, please read the enclosed proxy
statement / prospectus and promptly complete, sign,
date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid
envelope provided in accordance with the directions set forth on
the proxy card. Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
Professor John Liveris
Chairman of the Special Committee and
the Board of Directors
For a discussion of risk factors which you should consider in
evaluating the transaction, see Risk Factors
beginning on page 29.
THIS TRANSACTION HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, OR THE SEC, NOR
HAS THE SEC PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERITS OF THIS
TRANSACTION OR THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT / PROSPECTUS. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
This proxy statement / prospectus is dated
October 12, 2011, and is first being mailed, along with the
attached proxy card, to OceanFreight shareholders on or about
October 17, 2011.
NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2011
To Shareholders of OceanFreight Inc.:
The special meeting of shareholders of OceanFreight Inc., or
OceanFreight, will be held at OceanFreights principal
executive offices at 80 Kifissias Avenue, GR 151 25,
Amaroussion, Athens, Greece, on November 3, 2011, at
10:00 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 26, 2011, or
the merger agreement, by and among DryShips Inc., or DryShips,
Pelican Stockholdings Inc. and OceanFreight, pursuant to which
OceanFreight will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips.
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Only holders of record of OceanFreight Class A common
stock, or OceanFreight common stock, at the close of business on
October 7, 2011, the record date for the special meeting,
are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting
and any adjournments or postponements thereof. Each share of
OceanFreight common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all
matters that come before the special meeting.
A special committee of independent directors of OceanFreight
established to consider the proposed transaction and the
OceanFreight board of directors each unanimously recommends that
OceanFreights shareholders vote FOR
the approval of the merger agreement. Approval of the merger
agreement requires the affirmative vote by the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock
on the record date.
The merger is described in the accompanying proxy
statement / prospectus, which you are urged to read
carefully. A copy of the merger agreement is included in the
proxy statement / prospectus as Annex A.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please
complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the
enclosed envelope, which does not require postage if mailed in
the United States. If you do attend the special meeting and wish
to vote in person, you may do so notwithstanding the fact that
you previously submitted or appointed a proxy. Please note,
however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker,
bank, trustee or other nominee and you wish to vote at the
meeting, you must obtain from your nominee a proxy issued in
your name.
Please do not send your stock certificates at this time. If the
merger is completed, you will be sent instructions regarding the
surrender of your stock certificates.
Very truly yours,
Stefanos Delatolas
Corporate Secretary of OceanFreight Inc.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vi
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
|
|
ANNEXES
Annex D: OceanFreights Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
for the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Annex E: Updated information relating to
OceanFreight Inc., its fleet and recent developments and other
updates related to the passage of time, together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation and interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements and related information and data of
OceanFreight Inc. as of and for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011
v
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE VOTING PROCEDURES FOR
THE SPECIAL MEETING
The following are answers to some questions that you, as a
shareholder of OceanFreight, may have regarding the merger and
the other matters being considered at the shareholder meeting of
OceanFreight, or the special meeting or the OceanFreight special
meeting. OceanFreight urges you to read carefully the remainder
of this proxy statement / prospectus because the
information in this section does not provide all the information
that might be important to you with respect to the merger and
the other matters being considered at the special meeting.
Additional important information is also contained in the
Annexes to this proxy statement / prospectus.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote on? |
|
A: |
|
OceanFreight Inc., or OceanFreight, and DryShips Inc., or
DryShips, have entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated July 26, 2011, or the merger agreement, pursuant to
which DryShips has agreed to acquire OceanFreight. You are being
asked to vote to approve the merger agreement. Under the terms
of the merger agreement, a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary
of DryShips will merge with and into OceanFreight, with
OceanFreight continuing as the surviving corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive for my OceanFreight shares in the
merger? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, you will receive, with respect to
each share of OceanFreight Class A common stock, or
OceanFreight common stock, you own, $11.25 in cash and
0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock. |
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the OceanFreight special meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The special meeting of shareholders of OceanFreight will be held
on November 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. local time, at
OceanFreights principal executive offices at 80 Kifissias
Avenue, GR 151 25, Amaroussion, Athens, Greece, unless adjourned
or postponed to a later time. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can vote at the special meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Shareholders of record as of the close of business on
October 7, 2011, the record date for the special meeting,
are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the special
meeting. On the record date, there were 5,946,180 shares of
OceanFreight common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to
vote at the special meeting. You may vote all shares of
OceanFreight common stock you owned as of the close of business
on the record date. All shares of OceanFreight common stock that
were outstanding as of the close of business on the record date
are entitled to one vote per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
Some of OceanFreights shareholders hold their shares
through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee rather than
directly in their own names. As summarized below, there are some
distinctions between shares held of record and those owned
beneficially: |
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD If
your OceanFreight shares are registered directly in your name
with OceanFreights transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, then you are
considered the shareholder of record of those shares and these
proxy materials are being sent directly to you by OceanFreight.
As the shareholder of record, you have the right to grant a
proxy or vote in person at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
BENEFICIAL OWNER If your
OceanFreight shares are held in a stock brokerage account or
otherwise, by a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, then you
are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares held in
street name and these proxy materials are being
forwarded to you by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee
who is considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As
the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker,
bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares. You
are also invited to attend the special meeting. However, because
you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these
shares in person at the meeting unless you first obtain a legal
proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee holding
your shares.
|
vi
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
The merger agreement must be approved by a majority of the
outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock on the record
date for the special meeting. Approximately 50.5% of the
outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock, which were held
by certain entities controlled by OceanFreights Chief
Executive Officer, Antonis Kandylidis, were purchased by
DryShips on August 24, 2011 for $11.25 in cash and
0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock for each share of
OceanFreight common stock under a separate purchase agreement
approved by a special committee of independent directors
established by the OceanFreight board of directors, or the
OceanFreight Special Committee, and the OceanFreight board of
directors. DryShips has committed to vote those shares in favor
of the approval of the merger agreement. Accordingly, approval
of the merger agreement is assured. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I do not vote or do not fully complete my proxy
card? |
|
A: |
|
If you do not vote your shares of OceanFreight common stock with
respect to the proposal to approve the merger agreement, it will
have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. However, if
the proposal to approve the merger agreement is approved and the
merger is completed, your OceanFreight common stock will be
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration
even though you did not vote. |
|
|
|
If you submit a proxy without specifying the manner in which you
would like your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted
FOR approval of the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this document, please fill out, sign and date the
proxy card and then mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed
envelope, as soon as possible so that your shares may be voted
at the OceanFreight special meeting. See The Special
Meeting Voting; Proxies; Revocation. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my bank,
broker, trustee or other nominee, will my bank, broker, trustee
or other nominee vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
You should instruct your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee
to vote your shares. If you do not instruct your bank, broker,
trustee or other nominee, your bank, broker, trustee or other
nominee will not be able to vote your shares. Please check with
your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee and follow the
voting procedures your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee
provides. Your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee will
advise you whether you may submit voting instructions by
telephone or via the Internet. See The Special
Meeting Voting; Proxies; Revocation. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
|
|
|
We currently expect to complete the merger in the fourth quarter
of 2011. However, we cannot assure you when or if the merger
will be completed. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the material United States federal income tax
consequences of the merger to OceanFreight shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
For a U.S. Holder (as defined in Taxation
Certain Material Tax Consequences), the merger will be
treated for United States, or U.S., federal income tax purposes
as a taxable sale by such holder of the OceanFreight shares that
such holder surrenders in the merger for the shares of Ocean Rig
common stock and cash received in the merger. |
|
|
|
For a
Non-U.S.
Holder (as defined in Taxation Certain
Material Tax Consequences), any gain realized on the
receipt of shares of Ocean Rig common stock and cash in the
merger generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or
withholding tax unless such
Non-U.S.
Holder has certain connections to the United States. |
|
|
|
See Taxation Certain Material Tax
Consequences for a discussion of certain material U.S.
federal income tax consequences of (i) the merger and
(ii) owning and disposing of shares of Ocean common stock. |
vii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
May I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If your shares of OceanFreight common stock are registered
directly in your name, there are three ways you can change your
vote after you have submitted your proxy: |
|
|
|
First, you may complete and submit a signed written
notice of revocation to the Secretary of OceanFreight at the
address below:
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion 151 25
Athens, Greece |
|
|
|
Second, you may complete and submit a new proxy
card. Your latest vote actually received by OceanFreight before
the special meeting will be counted, and any earlier votes will
be revoked.
|
|
|
|
Third, you may attend the special meeting and vote
in person. Any earlier proxy will thereby be revoked. However,
simply attending the meeting without voting will not revoke any
earlier proxy you may have given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your OceanFreight shares are held in street name
by a bank, broker, trustee or other nominee, you must follow the
directions you receive from your bank, broker, trustee or other
nominee in order to change or revoke your vote and any deadlines
for the receipt of those instructions. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If I want to attend the special meeting, what do I do? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
You should come to OceanFreights principal executive
offices at 80 Kifissias Avenue, GR 151 25, Amaroussion, Athens,
Greece at 10:00 a.m. local time, on November 3, 2011.
If you hold your shares in street name, you will
need to bring proof of ownership (by means of a recent brokerage
statement, letter from your bank or broker or similar means) to
be admitted to the meeting. Shareholders of record as of the
record date for the special meeting can vote in person at the
special meeting. If your shares of OceanFreight common stock are
held in street name, then you are not the
shareholder of record and you must ask your bank, broker,
trustee or other nominee how you can vote at the special meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Should I send my stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. Shortly after the merger is completed, you will receive
a letter of transmittal with instructions informing you how to
send your OceanFreight stock certificates to the exchange agent
in order to receive the per share merger consideration. You
should use the letter of transmittal to exchange your
OceanFreight stock certificates for the per share merger
consideration to which you are entitled as a result of the
merger. Please do not send in your OceanFreight stock
certificates with your proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I cannot find my stock certificates? |
|
A: |
|
There will be a procedure for you to receive the merger
consideration in the merger, even if you have lost one or more
of your OceanFreight stock certificates. This procedure,
however, may take time to complete. In order to ensure that you
will be able to receive the merger consideration promptly after
the merger is completed, if you cannot locate your OceanFreight
stock certificates after looking for them carefully, we urge you
to contact OceanFreights transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as soon as
possible and follow the procedures they explain to you for
replacing your OceanFreight stock certificates. American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC can be reached at
1-800-937-5449
or on their website at www.amstock.com and at the email address
info@amstock.com, or you can write them at the following address: |
|
|
|
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219 |
|
Q: |
|
Are there risks I should consider in deciding whether to vote
for the merger agreement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. We have set forth a non-exhaustive list of risk factors
that you should consider carefully in connection with the
merger. See Risk Factors beginning on page 29. |
viii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will OceanFreight shareholders receive the merger
consideration? |
|
A: |
|
Following the merger, you will receive a letter of transmittal
and instructions on how to obtain the merger consideration in
exchange for your shares of OceanFreight common stock. You must
return the completed letter of transmittal and surrender your
OceanFreight stock certificates as described in the
instructions, and you will receive the merger consideration
after the exchange agent receives your completed letter of
transmittal, OceanFreight stock certificates and/or such other
documents that may be required by the exchange agent. See
The Transaction Procedures for Exchanging
Shares of OceanFreight Stock and Distribution of the Merger
Consideration. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my additional questions about the merger
or voting procedures? |
|
A: |
|
If you have more questions about the merger, including the
procedures to voting your shares you should contact OceanFreight: |
|
|
|
OceanFreight Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion 15125
Athens, Greece |
|
|
|
If your broker holds your shares, then you should also contact
your broker for additional information. |
ix
TRANSACTION
SUMMARY
This summary is not intended to be complete and is qualified
in all respects by the more detailed information appearing
elsewhere in this proxy statement / prospectus. You
should review carefully the entire proxy
statement / prospectus, including the Annexes. As used
throughout this proxy statement / prospectus,
(i) unless otherwise indicated, all references to
dollars and $ are to, and amounts are
presented in, U.S. Dollars, (ii) all references to
OceanFreight shares, OceanFreight common
shares, OceanFreight common stock and
shares of OceanFreight common stock refer to shares
of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
OceanFreight, (iii) all references to Ocean Rig
shares, Ocean Rig common shares, Ocean
Rig common stock and shares of Ocean Rig common
stock refer to shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of Ocean Rig and (iv) all references to the
SEC refer to the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Parties
to the Merger Agreement
DryShips
DryShips Inc., or DryShips, is an owner of drybulk carriers and
tankers that operate worldwide. Through its majority owned
subsidiary, Ocean Rig UDW Inc., or Ocean Rig, DryShips owns and
operates nine offshore ultra deepwater drilling units,
comprising of two ultra deepwater semisubmersible drilling rigs
and seven ultra deepwater drillships, three of which remain to
be delivered to Ocean Rig during 2013. DryShips owns a fleet of
35 drybulk carriers (including newbuildings), comprising
seven Capesize, 26 Panamax and two Supramax, with a combined
deadweight tonnage of over 3.3 million tons, and 12 tankers
(including newbuildings), comprising six Suezmax and six
Aframax, with a combined deadweight tonnage of over
1.6 million tons.
DryShips common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market where it trades under the symbol DRYS.
Pelican
Stockholdings Inc.
Pelican Stockholdings Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
DryShips. Pelican Stockholdings Inc. was organized on
July 22, 2011 solely for the purpose of effecting the
merger with OceanFreight. It has not carried on any activities
other than in connection with the transaction.
OceanFreight
OceanFreight Inc., or OceanFreight, is an owner and operator of
drybulk vessels that operate worldwide. OceanFreight owns a
fleet of six vessels, comprised of six drybulk vessels (four
Capesize and two Panamax) and has contracted to purchase five
newbuilding Very Large Ore Carriers, or VLOCs, currently under
construction, with a combined deadweight tonnage of about
1.9 million tons. Detailed information about OceanFreight
is included in Annexes D and E to this document.
OceanFreights common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global
Market where it trades under the symbol OCNF.
The
Merger
On July 26, 2011, DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings Inc. and
OceanFreight entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or
the merger agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the terms
and conditions of the merger agreement and in accordance with
the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or the MIBCA,
Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will merge with and into
OceanFreight. Following the merger, OceanFreight will continue
its corporate existence under the MIBCA as the surviving
corporation in the merger and will be a wholly-owned subsidiary
of DryShips. The merger agreement is included as Annex A to
this proxy statement / prospectus and you are
encouraged to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety because it is the legal agreement that governs the
merger. OceanFreight and Ocean Rig currently expect that the
merger will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2011.
However, OceanFreight and Ocean Rig cannot assure you when or if
the merger will occur.
1
Merger
Consideration
At the effective time of the merger, each share of OceanFreight
common stock outstanding (other than shares of OceanFreight
common stock held by DryShips or OceanFreight or any of their
respective direct or indirect subsidiaries) will be converted
into the right to receive:
|
|
|
|
|
$11.25 in cash; and
|
|
|
|
0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock.
|
OceanFreight shareholders will not receive fractional shares of
Ocean Rig common stock in the merger. Instead, each holder of
shares of OceanFreight common stock otherwise entitled to a
fraction of a share of Ocean Rig common stock will upon
surrender of the certificate representing such holders
shares of OceanFreight common stock, or the certificate, be
entitled to receive an amount of cash (without interest)
determined by multiplying $21.50 by the fractional share
interest to which the holder would otherwise be entitled.
Among certain other conditions (described below), the
obligations of OceanFreight and DryShips to complete the merger
are conditioned upon (i) the registration statement, of
which this proxy statement / prospectus forms a part,
having been declared effective and no stop order having been
issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or
the SEC, and (ii) the shares of Ocean Rig common stock
included in the merger consideration payable to the holders of
shares of OceanFreight common stock pursuant to the merger
agreement having been approved for listing on NASDAQ, subject to
the completion of the merger.
See The Merger Agreement Closing; Effective
Time Merger Consideration.
Purchase
and Sale Agreement
Concurrently with the execution of the merger agreement,
DryShips entered into a purchase and sale agreement, or the
purchase agreement, with Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel
Investments Limited and Haywood Finance Limited, or,
collectively, the Sellers (each of which is controlled by
Mr. Antonis Kandylidis, the Chief Executive Officer of
OceanFreight), and OceanFreight, pursuant to which DryShips
purchased from the Sellers, on August 24, 2011,
approximately 50.5% of the outstanding shares of OceanFreight
common stock, or the Seller Shares. The consideration paid by
DryShips for each share of OceanFreight common stock owned by
the Sellers consisted of (x) $11.25 in cash and
(y) 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock (with
cash paid in lieu of fractional shares). See The Purchase
and Sale Agreement.
Comparative
Market Prices and Share Information
OceanFreight common stock is listed and traded on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol OCNF. Ocean Rig
common stock currently trades on the OTC market maintained by
the Norwegian Association of Stockbroking Companies, or the
Norwegian OTC, under the symbol OCRG. Also, on
October 6, 2011, Ocean Rig common stock commenced trading
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
ORIG. On July 25, 2011, the last trading day in
the United States, or the U.S., before the announcement of
the transaction between OceanFreight and DryShips, the closing
price of OceanFreight common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market
was $9.47 per share and the last traded value of the Ocean Rig
common stock on the Norwegian OTC was NOK89.00 (or approximately
$16.44 based on the NOK / USD exchange rate of
NOK5.41 / $1 on July 25, 2011). Based on the
foregoing, the merger consideration of $11.25 and
0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock per share of
OceanFreight common stock reflected a value as of July 25,
2011 of $19.85 and a premium of approximately 109.6% over the
closing price of OceanFreight common stock on July 25, 2011.
On October 11, 2011, the most recent practicable trading
day prior to the printing of this proxy
statement / prospectus, the closing price of
OceanFreight common stock was $18.55 per share and the closing
price of Ocean Rig common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market was $15.75 per share.
See Comparative Per Share Market Price Information.
2
As discussed in detail elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus, a special committee of
independent directors established by the OceanFreight board of
directors, or the OceanFreight Special Committee, and the
OceanFreight board of directors have determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are in the best interests of OceanFreights
shareholders (other than DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings Inc.,
Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel Investments Limited and
Haywood Finance Limited) and have unanimously approved the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The
OceanFreight Special Committee and the OceanFreight board of
directors unanimously recommend that OceanFreights
shareholders vote FOR the approval of
the merger agreement.
In the course of reaching their decision to approve the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the
OceanFreight Special Committee and the OceanFreight board of
directors considered a number of factors in their deliberations.
Those factors are described in the section entitled The
Transaction OceanFreights Reasons for the
Merger; Recommendation of the OceanFreight Special Committee and
Board of Directors. Among others, the following factors
supported the decision of the OceanFreight Special Committee and
the OceanFreight board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
The current and historical prices of OceanFreights common
stock and the fact that the per share merger consideration of
$11.25 in cash and 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock
represents a premium of approximately 109.6% over the closing
price of $9.47 per share of OceanFreights common stock on
July 25, 2011, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the merger;
|
|
|
|
The OceanFreight Special Committees and the OceanFreight
board of directors view that the merger is more favorable
to OceanFreights shareholders than the possible
alternatives to the merger, including continuing to operate
OceanFreight as an independent publicly traded company or
pursuing other strategic alternatives, because of the uncertain
returns to such shareholders in light of OceanFreights
business, operations, financial condition and obligations
(including OceanFreights debt and newbuilding
obligations), strategy and prospects, as well as the risks
involved in achieving those returns, the uncertainties
surrounding the availability of future equity or debt financing,
the nature of the dry bulk shipping industry, and general
industry, economic and market conditions, both on a historical
and on a prospective basis; and
|
|
|
|
The fact that the merger consideration contains a significant
cash component, so that the transaction allows
OceanFreights shareholders to realize immediately a
considerable portion of their investment in cash and provides
such shareholders with a level of certainty as to the value of
their shares, while also providing such shareholders with the
opportunity to participate in the potential growth of Ocean Rig
following the merger.
|
See The Transaction OceanFreights
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the OceanFreight
Special Committee and Board of Directors.
The
OceanFreight Special Committee has Received an Opinion from
OceanFreights Financial Advisor
On July 25, 2011, Fearnley Fonds ASA, or Fearnley, rendered
its oral opinion to the OceanFreight Special Committee, which
was subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of the date of
the opinion, and based upon and subject to the considerations
and limitations set forth in its written opinion, its work
described in its written opinion and other factors it deemed
relevant, the merger consideration to be received by the holders
of OceanFreight common stock, was fair from a financial point of
view to such holders. The full text of the written opinion of
Fearnley, which sets forth the various assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is included as
Annex C to this proxy statement / prospectus.
Fearnleys opinion was provided for the benefit of the
OceanFreight Special Committee in connection with, and for the
purpose of, its evaluation of the merger. The opinion does not
constitute a recommendation as to how any holder of OceanFreight
common stock should vote with respect to the merger or any
matter related thereto. Holders of shares of OceanFreight common
stock are urged to read the opinion of Fearnley carefully and in
its entirety.
See The Transaction Opinion of
OceanFreights Financial Advisor.
3
Tax
Considerations
For a U.S. Holder (as defined in Taxation
Certain Material Tax Consequences), the merger will be
treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a taxable sale
by such holder of the OceanFreight shares that such holder
surrenders in the merger for the Ocean Rig shares and cash
received in the merger.
For a
Non-U.S. Holder
(as defined in Taxation Certain Material Tax
Consequences), any gain realized on the receipt of Ocean
Rig shares and cash in the merger generally will not be subject
to U.S. federal income or withholding tax unless such
Non-U.S. Holder
has certain connections to the United States.
See Taxation Certain Material Tax
Consequences for a discussion of certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of (i) the merger
and (ii) owning and disposing of Ocean Rig shares.
Some of the members of OceanFreights board of directors
and certain of OceanFreights executive officers have
financial interests in the merger that are in addition to,
and/or
different from, the interests of holders of OceanFreight common
stock. The independent members of OceanFreights board of
directors were aware of these additional
and/or
differing interests and potential conflicts and considered them,
among other matters, in evaluating, negotiating and approving
the merger agreement. These interests include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
As indicated above, entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis,
the Chief Executive Officer of OceanFreight, are parties to the
purchase agreement under which DryShips purchased the Seller
Shares owned by these entities at a per share purchase price
equal to the per share merger consideration on August 24,
2011. See The Purchase and Sale Agreement.
|
|
|
|
OceanFreights consultancy agreement with Steel Wheel
Investments Limited, a company wholly-owned by
Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief Executive Officer of
OceanFreight, as modified by an addendum dated July 25,
2011, entitles Steel Wheel Investments Limited to a change of
control payment of 2.7 million upon closing of the
merger and, pursuant to the addendum noted above, entitles Steel
Wheel Investments Limited to the continued payment of its
monthly consultancy fee of 75,000 until the later of
December 31, 2011 or the closing of the merger.
|
|
|
|
DryShips has agreed to use reasonable efforts to enter into
employment agreements with OceanFreights President and
Chief Operating Officer, Demetris Nenes and OceanFreights
Chief Financial Officer, Solon Dracoulis.
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement provides for director and officer
indemnification arrangements for each of OceanFreights
directors and officers and provides existing directors and
officers liability insurance to the OceanFreight directors
and officers that will continue for six years following
completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
All legal and advisory fees up to $1,500,000 incurred by
entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis in connection with
the sale of their shares of OceanFreight common stock to
DryShips will be paid for by OceanFreight.
|
|
|
|
The closing of the purchase agreement caused shares of
OceanFreight restricted stock (approximately 35,222 shares)
held by OceanFreights officers and directors and their
affiliates to vest.
|
See The Transaction Interests of
OceanFreights Directors and Officers in the Merger.
Key Terms
of the Merger Agreement
Conditions
to the Merger Agreement
As more fully described in this proxy
statement / prospectus and in the merger agreement,
the obligations of OceanFreight and DryShips to complete the
merger are conditioned upon:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the merger and the merger agreement by
OceanFreights shareholders in accordance with the MIBCA;
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
no law, rule or regulation or any order, injunction, judgment,
decree or similar requirement of any governmental authority to
which any of the parties or by which any of the parties is
subject or bound preventing or prohibiting the consummation of
the merger shall be in effect;
|
|
|
|
the registration statement, of which this proxy
statement / prospectus forms a part, having been
declared effective and no stop order having been issued by the
SEC; and
|
|
|
|
the shares of Ocean Rig common stock included in the merger
consideration payable to the holders of shares of OceanFreight
common stock pursuant to the merger having been approved for
listing on NASDAQ, subject to the completion of the merger.
|
Also, the obligations of OceanFreight and DryShips to complete
the merger are conditioned upon:
|
|
|
|
|
the other partys representations and warranties being true
and correct, except for failures that individually or in the
aggregate would not reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect on that party;
|
|
|
|
the other party having complied in all material respects with
its obligations under the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of any material adverse effect on the other
partys financial condition, business or results of
operations taken as a whole.
|
However, since the consummation of the purchase agreement
(described above), DryShips obligation to complete the
merger is no longer conditioned upon
(i) OceanFreights representations and warranties
being true or (ii) the absence of any material adverse
effect on OceanFreights financial condition, business or
results of operations.
No
Solicitation; Withdrawal of Board Recommendation
OceanFreight and its subsidiaries and representatives may not,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly take any action designed to
facilitate or encourage any acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations
with, furnish any information relating to OceanFreight or any of
its subsidiaries or provide access to the business, properties,
assets, books or records of OceanFreight or any of its
subsidiaries to any third party with respect to inquiries
regarding, or the making of, an acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
fail to make, withdraw, or modify or amend in a manner adverse
to DryShips the recommendation of either the OceanFreight
Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of directors, or
recommend any other acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
grant any waiver or release under any standstill or similar
agreement with respect to any class of equity securities of
OceanFreight or any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse, recommend, enter into, or make a public
proposal regarding, any agreement in principle, letter of
intent, term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement,
option agreement or other similar agreement relating to an
acquisition proposal, with the exception of a confidentiality
agreement with a permitted third party;
|
|
|
|
approve any transaction under Article K of
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation (which relates to business combinations); or
|
|
|
|
redeem the rights issued to holders of OceanFreights
common stock pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated
Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated as of April 8, 2011, or
OceanFreights rights plan, amend or modify or terminate
OceanFreights rights plan or exempt any person from, or
approve any transaction under, OceanFreights rights plan.
|
Notwithstanding these prohibitions:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to August 23, 2011, OceanFreight was permitted to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
engage in negotiations or discussions with any third party, that
made an unsolicited written acquisition proposal after the date
of the merger agreement if the OceanFreight Special Committee
reasonably
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
believed in good faith, after consulting with external legal and
financial advisors, that the proposal would reasonably have been
expected to lead to a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter furnish to such third party non-public information
relating to OceanFreight or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to
a confidentiality agreement; and
|
|
|
|
if, in the case of the actions described in the two subbullets
above, the OceanFreight Special Committee determined in good
faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the
failure to take such action would have been reasonably likely to
result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law
and OceanFreight had provided DryShips two business days notice
of its intention to take any action discussed in the two
subbullets above; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to OceanFreights shareholders approving the merger,
the OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of
directors may withdraw its recommendation in favor of the
proposed merger in response to a material fact, event, change,
development or set of circumstances (other than an acquisition
proposal) arising during the period after the date of the merger
agreement and before the approval of OceanFreight shareholders,
which was not known or reasonably foreseeable by the
OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of
directors on the date of the merger agreement, if the failure to
withdraw, modify or amend the recommendation would be reasonably
likely to result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under
applicable law; however, DryShips must be given at least five
business days prior written notice by OceanFreight and, if
requested by DryShips, OceanFreight must engage in good faith
negotiations with DryShips to amend the merger agreement in such
a manner that obviates the need for a withdrawal of the
recommendation in favor of the proposed merger.
|
In addition, prior to August 23, 2011, OceanFreight had the
right to terminate the merger agreement to enter into a
definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal or make
a recommendation in connection with a superior proposal if the
superior proposal did not result from a breach of the
non-solicitation provisions of the merger agreement, and the
OceanFreight Special Committee reasonably determined in good
faith after consultation with its outside counsel and financial
advisors that the failure to take any such action would have
breached its fiduciary duties to OceanFreight shareholders,
subject to certain conditions.
For additional information on limitations on solicitation and
withdrawal of board recommendations, see The Merger
Agreement No Solicitation.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights for
OceanFreight and DryShips (even after the vote of the
OceanFreight shareholders), including the right of:
|
|
|
|
|
both parties to terminate the merger agreement by mutual
agreement;
|
|
|
|
either party to terminate the merger agreement if the merger has
not become effective by March 26, 2012 or applicable law
prohibits the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight to terminate the merger agreement if either
DryShips or Pelican Stockholdings Inc. has materially breached
the merger agreement, including by failing to perform covenants
or obligations under the merger agreement or because certain of
its representations and warranties have become untrue, or upon
certain other events, and that breach has not been
cured; and
|
|
|
|
DryShips to terminate the merger agreement if OceanFreight has
materially breached the merger agreement by failing to perform
covenants or obligations under the merger agreement, and that
breach has not been cured.
|
Additionally, DryShips or OceanFreight had the right to
terminate the merger agreement in two additional circumstances
that are no longer applicable. First, DryShips had the right to
terminate the merger agreement prior to the purchase agreement
closing date, which occurred on August 24, 2011, if: the
OceanFreight Special Committee made an adverse recommendation in
respect of the merger; OceanFreight entered into a binding
agreement (other than a confidentiality agreement contemplated
by the merger agreement) with a third party relating to any
6
acquisition proposal; the OceanFreight Special Committee or the
OceanFreight board of directors failed publicly to reaffirm its
recommendation of the merger agreement or the merger within five
business days of receipt of a written request by DryShips or
Pelican Stockholdings Inc. to provide such reaffirmation
following an acquisition proposal from a third party; or
OceanFreight or any of its representatives materially breached
any of its obligations under the non-solicitation provisions
under the merger agreement.
Second, OceanFreight had the right to terminate the merger
agreement, prior to August 23, 2011, in relation to a
superior proposal (in accordance with the requirements set out
above), provided that OceanFreight paid to DryShips the
termination fee described below, and immediately following
termination of the merger agreement, OceanFreight entered into a
definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal.
For additional information on OceanFreights and
DryShips rights to terminate the merger agreement, see
The Merger Agreement Termination.
Termination
Fee
If (i) the merger agreement is terminated by DryShips
(i) as a result of a material breach by OceanFreight of its
covenants or obligations, (ii) an acquisition proposal is
made prior to termination of the merger agreement, and
(iii) prior to the first anniversary of the date of
termination, OceanFreight enters into a definitive agreement
with respect to or recommends to its shareholders any
acquisition proposal or any such acquisition proposal shall have
been consummated, then OceanFreight will be required to pay a
termination fee of $4.5 million in cash to DryShips.
Additionally, a termination fee would have been payable in two
additional circumstances that are no longer applicable. First,
if the merger agreement was terminated by DryShips prior to the
closing of the purchase agreement, which occurred on
August 24, 2011, and pursuant to the merger agreement, in
the event that (i) prior to the purchase agreement closing
date, the OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight
board of directors made an adverse recommendation,
(ii) OceanFreight entered into a binding agreement (other
than a confidentiality agreement contemplated by the merger
agreement) relating to any third-party acquisition proposal,
(iii) the OceanFreight Special Committee or the
OceanFreight board of directors failed publicly to reaffirm its
recommendation of the merger agreement or the transaction
contemplated thereby within five business days of receipt of a
written request by DryShips or Pelican Stockholdings Inc. to
provide such a reaffirmation following any third-party
acquisition proposal, or (iv) OceanFreight or any of its
representatives materially breached any of its obligations
relating to the prohibition on solicitation under the merger
agreement, then OceanFreight would have been required to pay to
DryShips in immediately available funds a termination fee of
$4.5 million in cash.
Second, if the merger agreement was terminated by OceanFreight
prior to August 23, 2011 after receipt of a superior
proposal (and in accordance with the provisions set out above),
then OceanFreight would have been required to pay to DryShips in
immediately available funds a termination fee of
$4.5 million in cash.
For additional information on the termination fee and
reimbursement of expenses, see The Merger
Agreement Termination Fee and Expenses.
Risk
Factors
In evaluating the transaction, the merger agreement or the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, you should
carefully read this proxy statement / prospectus and
especially consider the factors discussed in the section
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 29.
7
OCEAN RIG
SUMMARY
Ocean
Rig
Ocean Rig is an international offshore drilling contractor
providing oilfield services for offshore oil and gas
exploration, development and production drilling and
specializing in the ultra-deepwater and harsh-environment
segment of the offshore drilling industry. Ocean Rig seeks to
utilize its high-specification drilling units to the maximum
extent of their technical capability and Ocean Rig believes that
it has earned a reputation for operating performance excellence.
Ocean Rig currently owns and operates two modern, fifth
generation ultra-deepwater semi-submersible offshore drilling
rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude, and
four sixth generation, advanced capability ultra-deepwater
drillships, the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, delivered in January 2011, March 2011, July 2011
and September 2011, respectively, by Samsung Heavy Industries
Co. Ltd., or Samsung.
Ocean Rig has additional newbuilding contracts with Samsung for
the construction of three seventh generation newbuilding
drillships, or Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls. These
three newbuilding drillships are currently scheduled for
delivery in July 2013, September 2013 and November 2013,
respectively. The Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos are sister-ships constructed by the same
shipyard to the same high-quality vessel design and
specifications and are capable of drilling in water depths of
10,000 feet. The design of Ocean Rigs seventh
generation hulls reflects additional enhancements that, with the
purchase of additional equipment, will enable the drillship to
drill in water depths of 12,000 feet.
Ocean Rig also has options with Samsung for the construction of
up to three additional seventh generation ultra-deepwater
drillships at an estimated total project cost, excluding
financing costs, of $638.0 million per drillship, based on
a shipyard contract price of $570.0 million, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses of
$30.0 million. These options are exercisable by Ocean Rig
at any time on or prior to January 31, 2012.
Ocean Rig believes that the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos, as well as its three newbuilding
drillships, will be among the most technologically advanced
drillships in the world. The S10000E design, used for the
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos, was
originally introduced in 1998 and according to Fearnley Offshore
AS, including these four drillships, a total of 45 drillships
have been ordered using this base design, which has been widely
accepted by customers, of which 24 had been delivered as of July
2011, including the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean
Rig Olympia. Among other technological enhancements, Ocean
Rig drillships are equipped with dual activity drilling
technology, which involves two drilling systems using a single
derrick that permits two drilling-related operations to take
place simultaneously. Ocean Rig estimates this technology saves
between 15% and 40% in drilling time, depending on the well
parameters. The Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos are capable of drilling 40,000 feet at water
depths of 10,000 feet and Ocean Rigs seventh
generation hulls will have the capacity to drill
40,000 feet at water depths of 12,000 feet. Ocean Rig
currently has a team of its employees at Samsung overseeing the
construction of the three newbuilding drillships to help ensure
that those drillships are built on time, to Ocean Rigs
exact vessel specifications and on budget, as was the case for
the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia,
the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos.
The total cost of construction and construction-related expenses
for the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos amounted to approximately $755.7 million,
$756.9 million, $791.8 million and $784.4 million,
respectively. Construction-related expenses include equipment
purchases, commissioning, supervision and commissions to related
parties, excluding financing costs and fair value adjustments.
As of September 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had made an aggregate
of $726.7 million of construction and construction-related
payments for its three seventh generation hulls and have
remaining total construction and construction-related payments
relating to these drillships of approximately $1.2 billion
in the aggregate.
Ocean Rigs revenue, earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, and net income for the
twelve-months ended June 30, 2011 were $452.4 million,
$242.2 million and $114.0 million, respectively. Ocean
Rig believes EBITDA provides useful information to investors
because it is a basis upon which it measures its operations and
efficiency. Please see Selected Historical Consolidated
Financial and Other Data of Ocean Rig for a reconciliation
of EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or
U.S. GAAP, financial measure.
8
Ocean
Rigs Fleet
Set forth below is summary information concerning Ocean
Rigs offshore drilling units as of September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Built or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled
|
|
|
Water Depth
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery/
|
|
|
to the
|
|
|
Depth to the
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling
|
Unit
|
|
Generation
|
|
|
Wellhead (ft)
|
|
|
Oil Field (ft)
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Dayrate
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Existing Drilling Rigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leiv Eiriksson
|
|
|
2001 / 5th
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
Cairn Energy plc
|
|
|
Q2 2011 Q4 2011
|
|
|
$
|
560,000
|
|
|
Greenland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borders &
Southern plc
|
|
|
Q4 2011 Q2 2012
|
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
Falkland Islands
|
Eirik Raude
|
|
|
2002 / 5th
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
Tullow Oil plc
|
|
|
Q4 2008 Q4 2011
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
665,000
|
|
|
Ghana
|
Existing Drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig Corcovado(A)
|
|
|
2011 / 6th
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Cairn Energy plc
|
|
|
Q1 2011 Q4 2011
|
|
|
$
|
560,000
|
|
|
Greenland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.
|
|
|
Q4 2011 Q4 2014
|
|
|
$
|
460,000
|
|
|
Brazil
|
Ocean Rig Olympia(A)
|
|
|
2011 / 6th
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Vanco Cote
dIvoire Ltd.
and Vanco
Ghana Ltd.
|
|
|
Q2 2011 Q2 2012
|
|
|
$
|
415,000
|
|
|
West Africa
|
Ocean Rig Poseidon(A)
|
|
|
2011 / 6th
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Petrobras
Tanzania
Limited
|
|
|
Q3 2011 Q3 2013
|
|
|
$
|
632,000*
|
|
|
Tanzania and
West Africa
|
Ocean Rig Mykonos(A)
|
|
|
2011 / 6th
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.
|
|
|
Q4 2011 Q4 2014
|
|
|
$
|
455,000
|
|
|
Brazil
|
Newbuilding Drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB #1 (TBN)(A)
|
|
|
Q3 2013 / 7th
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB #2 (TBN)(A)
|
|
|
Q3 2013 / 7th
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB #3 (TBN)(A)
|
|
|
Q4 2013 / 7th
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional Newbuilding Drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB Option #1(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB Option #2(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB Option #3(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents sister ship vessels built to the same or
similar design and specifications. |
|
(B) |
|
On October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into drilling
contracts for the Eirik Raude with two independent oil
operators based in the United Kingdom and the United States that
are expected to commence after completion of the existing Tullow
Oil contract around mid-October. |
|
* |
|
Maximum Dayrate |
Employment
of Ocean Rigs Fleet
In April 2011, the Leiv Eiriksson commenced a contract
with a term of approximately six months with Cairn Energy plc,
or Cairn, for drilling operations in Greenland at a maximum
operating dayrate of $560,000 and a mobilization fee of
$7.0 million plus fuel costs. The contract period is
scheduled to expire on October 31, 2011, subject to Ocean
Rigs customers option to extend the contract period
through November 30, 2011. Following the expiration of its
contract with Cairn, the Leiv Eiriksson is scheduled to
commence a contract with Borders & Southern for
drilling operations offshore the Falkland Islands at a maximum
operating dayrate of $530,000 and a $3.0 million fee
payable upon commencement of mobilization as well as
mobilization and demobilization fees, including fuel costs, of
$15.4 million and $12.6 million, respectively. The
contract was originally a two-well program at a maximum dayrate
of $540,000; however, on May 19, 2011, Borders &
Southern exercised its option to extend the contract to drill an
additional two wells, which it assigned to Falkland Oil and Gas
Limited, or Falkland Oil and Gas, and the maximum dayrate
decreased to $530,000. Borders & Southern has the
option to further extend this contract to drill an additional
fifth well, in which case the dayrate would increase to
$540,000. The estimated duration for the four-well contract,
including mobilization/demobilization periods, is approximately
230 days, and Ocean Rig estimates that the optional period
to drill the additional fifth well would extend the contract
term by approximately 45 days.
The Eirik Raude is employed under a contract, or the
Tullow Oil contract, with Tullow Oil plc, or Tullow Oil, for
development drilling offshore of Ghana at a weighted average
dayrate of $637,000, based upon 100% utilization. On
February 15, 2011, the dayrate increased to a maximum of
$665,000, which rate will be effective until expiration of the
contract in October 2011. On October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig
entered into drilling contracts for the Eirik Raude for
three additional wells offshore of West Africa, with two
independent oil operators based in the
9
United Kingdom and the United States. The total revenue backlog,
excluding mobilization cost, to complete the three wells program
is estimated at $96 million for a period of approximately
175 days. The new contracts are expected to commence after
completion of the existing Tullow Oil contract around
mid-October.
The Ocean Rig Corcovado is employed under a contract with
Cairn for a period of approximately ten months, under which the
drillship commenced drilling and related operations in Greenland
in May 2011 at a maximum operating dayrate of $560,000. In
addition, Ocean Rig is entitled to a mobilization fee of
$17.0 million, plus fuel costs, and winterization upgrading
costs of $12.0 million, plus coverage of yard stay costs at
$200,000 per day during the winterization upgrade. The contract
period is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2011, subject
to Ocean Rigs customers option to extend the
contract period through November 30, 2011. On July 20,
2011, Ocean Rig entered into a three-year contract with
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., or Petrobras Brazil, for the
Ocean Rig Corcovado for drilling operations offshore
Brazil at a maximum dayrate of $460,000, plus a mobilization fee
of $30.0 million. The contract is scheduled to commence
upon the expiration of the drillships contract with Cairn.
The Ocean Rig Olympia is employed under contracts to
drill a total of five wells with Vanco Cote dIvoire Ltd.
and Vanco Ghana Ltd., or, collectively, Vanco, for exploration
drilling offshore of Ghana and Cote dIvoire at a maximum
operating dayrate of $415,000 and a daily mobilization rate of
$180,000, plus fuel costs. The aggregate contract term is for
approximately one year, subject to Ocean Rigs
customers option to extend the term at the same dayrate
for (i) one additional well, (ii) one additional year
or (iii) one additional well plus one additional year.
Vanco is required to exercise the option no later than the date
on which the second well in the five-well program reaches its
target depth.
The Ocean Rig Poseidon commenced a contract with
Petrobras Tanzania Limited, or Petrobras Tanzania, a company
related to Petrobras Oil & Gas B.V., or Petrobras
Oil & Gas, on July 29, 2011 for drilling
operations in Tanzania and West Africa for a period of
544 days, plus a mobilization period, at a maximum dayrate
of $632,000, including a bonus of up to $46,000. In addition,
Ocean Rig is entitled to receive a separate dayrate of $422,500
for up to 60 days during relocation and a mobilization
dayrate of $317,000, plus the cost of fuel. The Ocean Rig
Poseidon is currently earning mobilization fees under the
contract. Drilling operations commenced on August 28, 2011.
On July 20, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into a three-year
contract with Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Mykonos
for drilling operations offshore Brazil at a maximum dayrate
of $455,000, plus a mobilization fee of $30.0 million. The
contract is scheduled to commence in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Ocean Rig has not arranged employment for its three seventh
generation hulls, which are scheduled to be delivered in July
2013, September 2013 and November 2013, respectively.
Option to
Purchase Additional New Drillships
On November 22, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into a contract with Samsung that granted
DryShips options for the construction of up to four additional
ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos with certain upgrades to vessel design
and specifications. The option agreement required DryShips to
pay a non-refundable slot reservation fee of $24.8 million
per drillship. The option agreement was novated by DryShips to
Ocean Rig on December 30, 2010, at a cost of
$99.0 million, which Ocean Rig paid from the net proceeds
of a private offering of its common shares that Ocean Rig
completed in December 2010. In addition, Ocean Rig paid
additional deposits totaling $20.0 million to Samsung in
the first quarter of 2011 to maintain favorable costs and yard
slot timing under the option contract.
On May 16, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an addendum to the
option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which Samsung granted
Ocean Rig the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to its drillships and its seventh
generation hulls, with certain upgrades to vessel design and
specifications. Ocean Rig did not pay slot reservation fees in
connection with its entry into this addendum.
As of the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
Ocean Rig has exercised three of the six options and, as a
result, has entered into shipbuilding contracts for its seventh
generation hulls with deliveries scheduled in July 2013,
September 2013 and November 2013, respectively. Ocean Rig made
payments of $632.4 million to the shipyard in the second
quarter of 2011 in connection with its exercise of the three
newbuilding drillship options. The estimated total project cost
per drillship is $638.0 million, which consists of
$570.0 million of construction costs, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses
10
of $30.0 million. These upgrades include a 7 ram blowout
preventer, or BOP, a dual mud system and, with the purchase of
additional equipment, the capability to drill up to
12,000 feet water depth.
Ocean Rig may exercise the three remaining newbuilding drillship
options at any time on or prior to January 31, 2012, with
vessel deliveries ranging from the first to the third quarter of
2014, depending on when the options are exercised. Ocean Rig
estimates the total project cost, excluding financing costs, for
the remaining three optional drillships to be
$638.0 million per drillship, based on the construction and
construction-related expenses for its seventh generation hulls
described above.
As part of the novation of the contract described above, the
benefit of the slot reservation fees passed to Ocean Rig. The
amount of the slot reservation fees for the seventh generation
hulls has been applied towards the drillship contract prices and
the amount of the slot reservation fees applicable to one of the
remaining three newbuilding drillship options will be applied
towards the drillship contract price if the option is exercised.
Management
of Ocean Rigs Drilling Units
Ocean Rigs existing drilling rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson
and the Eirik Raude, are managed by Ocean Rig AS,
Ocean Rigs wholly-owned subsidiary. Ocean Rig AS also
provides supervisory management services, including onshore
management, to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the Ocean Rig
Mykonos and Ocean Rigs newbuilding drillships pursuant
to separate management agreements entered into with each of the
drillship-owning subsidiaries. Under the terms of these
management agreements, Ocean Rig AS, through its offices in
Stavanger, Norway, Aberdeen, United Kingdom and Houston, Texas,
is responsible for, among other things, (i) assisting in
construction contract technical negotiations, (ii) securing
contracts for the future employment of the drillships, and
(iii) providing commercial, technical and operational
management for the drillships.
Pursuant to the Global Services Agreement between DryShips and
Cardiff Marine Inc., or Cardiff, a related party, effective
December 21, 2010, DryShips has engaged Cardiff to act as
consultant on matters of chartering and sale and purchase
transactions for the offshore drilling units operated by Ocean
Rig. Under the Global Services Agreement, Cardiff, or its
subcontractor, will (i) provide consulting services related
to identifying, sourcing, negotiating and arranging new
employment for offshore assets of DryShips and its subsidiaries,
including Ocean Rigs drilling units and
(ii) identify, source, negotiate and arrange the sale or
purchase of the offshore assets of DryShips and its
subsidiaries, including Ocean Rigs drilling units. The
services provided by Ocean Rig AS and Cardiff overlap mainly
with respect to negotiating shipyard orders and providing
marketing for potential contractors. Cardiff has an established
reputation within the shipping industry, and has developed
expertise and a network of strong relationships with
shipbuilders and oil companies, which supplement the management
capabilities of Ocean Rig AS. Ocean Rig may benefit from
services provided in accordance the Global Services Agreement.
See Business Management of Ocean Rigs
Drilling Units Global Services Agreement.
Ocean
Rigs Competitive Strengths
Ocean Rig believes that its prospects for success are enhanced
by the following aspects of its business:
Proven track record in ultra-deepwater drilling
operations. Ocean Rig has a well-established
record of operating drilling equipment with a primary focus on
ultra-deepwater offshore locations and harsh environments.
Established in 1996, Ocean Rig employed 1,093 people as of
September 30, 2011, and has gained significant experience
operating in challenging environments with a proven track record
for operations excellence through Ocean Rigs completion of
105 wells. Ocean Rig capitalizes on its high-specification
drilling units to the maximum extent of their technical
capability, and Ocean Rig believes that it has earned a
reputation for operating performance excellence. Ocean Rig has
operated the Leiv Eiriksson since 2001 and the Eirik
Raude since 2002. From February 24, 2010 through
February 3, 2011, the Leiv Eiriksson performed
drilling operations in the Black Sea under its contract with
Petrobras Oil & Gas, or the Petrobras contract, and
achieved a 91% earnings efficiency. The Eirik Raude has
been operating in deep water offshore of Ghana under the Tullow
Oil contract and achieved a 98% earnings efficiency for the
period beginning October 2008, when the rig commenced the
contract, through June 30, 2011.
Technologically advanced deepwater drilling
units. According to Fearnley Offshore AS, the
Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude are two of only
15 drilling units worldwide as of July 2011 that are
technologically equipped to operate in both ultra-deepwater and
harsh environments. Additionally, each of Ocean Rigs
drillships will be either a sixth or seventh generation,
advanced capability, ultra-deepwater drillship built based on a
proven design that features full dual derrick enhancements. The
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig
11
Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos have the
capacity to drill 40,000 feet at water depths of
10,000 feet and Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls
will have the capacity to drill 40,000 feet at water depths of
12,000 feet. One of the key benefits of each of Ocean
Rigs drillships is its dual activity drilling
capabilities, which involves two drilling systems that use a
single derrick and which permits two drilling-related operations
to take place simultaneously. Ocean Rig estimates that this
capability reduces typical drilling time by approximately 15% to
40%, depending on the well parameters, resulting in greater
utilization and cost savings to Ocean Rigs customers.
According to Fearnley Offshore AS, of the 34 ultra-deepwater
drilling units to be delivered worldwide in 2011, only 11 are
expected to have dual activity drilling capabilities, including
Ocean Rigs four drillships. As a result of the
Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling accident in the Gulf
of Mexico in April 2010, in which Ocean Rig was not involved,
Ocean Rig believes that independently and nationally owned oil
companies and international governments will increase their
focus on safety and the prevention of environmental disasters
and, as a result, Ocean Rig expects that high quality and
technologically advanced drillships such as Ocean Rigs
will be in high demand and at the forefront of ultra-deepwater
drilling activity.
Long-term blue-chip customer
relationships. Since the commencement of its
operations, Ocean Rig has developed relationships with large
independent oil producers such as Chevron Corporation, or
Chevron, Exxon Mobil Corporation, or ExxonMobil, Petrobras
Oil & Gas, Royal Dutch Shell plc, or Shell, BP plc, or
BP, Total S.A., or Total, Statoil ASA, or Statoil, and Tullow
Oil. Together with its predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, Ocean Rig has
drilled 105 wells in 15 countries for 22 clients, including
those listed above. Currently, Ocean Rig has employment
contracts with Petrobras Oil & Gas, Petrobras
Tanzania, Petrobras Brazil, Tullow Oil, Borders &
Southern, Cairn and Vanco. Ocean Rig believes these strong
customer relationships stem from its proven track record for
dependability and for delivering high-quality drilling services
in the most extreme operating environments. Although Ocean
Rigs former clients are not obligated to use its services,
it expects to use its relationships with its current and former
customers to secure attractive employment contracts for its
drilling units.
High barriers to entry. There are significant
barriers to entry in the ultra-deepwater offshore drilling
industry. Given the technical expertise needed to operate
ultra-deepwater drilling rigs and drillships, operational
know-how and a track record of safety play an important part in
contract awards. The offshore drilling industry in some
jurisdictions is highly regulated, and compliance with
regulations requires significant operational expertise and
financial and management resources. With the negative press
around the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig accident, Ocean
Rig expects regulators worldwide to implement more stringent
regulations and oil companies to place a premium on drilling
firms with a proven track record for safety. There are also
significant capital requirements for building ultra-deepwater
drillships. Further, there is limited shipyard availability for
new drillships and required lead times are typically in excess
of two years. Additionally, due to the recent financial crisis,
access to bank lending, the traditional source for ship and
offshore financing, has become constrained. According to
Fearnley Offshore AS, as of July 2011, there were 85
ultra-deepwater drilling units in operation with another 62
under construction, including the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the
Ocean Rig Mykonos and Ocean Rigs three newbuilding
drillships.
Anticipated strong free cash flow
generation. Based on current and expected supply
and demand dynamics in ultra-deepwater drilling, Ocean Rig
expects dayrates to be above its estimated daily cash breakeven
rate, based on estimated daily operating costs, general and
administrative costs and debt service requirements, thereby
generating substantial free cash flow going forward. According
to Fearnley Offshore AS, the most recent charterhire in the
industry for a modern ultra-deepwater drillship or rig (June
2011) was at a gross dayrate of $450,000 for a two-year
contract commencing in the third quarter of 2012. As of
September 30, 2011, Ocean Rigs
five-unit
fleet generated a maximum average dayrate of $560,000.
Leading shipbuilder constructing Ocean Rigs
newbuildings. Only a limited number of
shipbuilders possess the necessary construction and underwater
drilling technologies and experience to construct drillships.
The Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia,
the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
were, and Ocean Rigs three newbuilding drillships are
being, built by Samsung, which is one of the worlds
largest shipbuilders in the high-tech and high-value
shipbuilding sectors, which include drillships, ultra-large
container ships, liquefied natural gas carriers and floating
production storage and offshore units, or FPSOs. According to
Fearnley Offshore AS, of the 74 drillships ordered on a global
basis since 2005, Samsung has delivered or will deliver 40,
representing a 54% market share. To date, construction of Ocean
Rigs newbuilding drillships has progressed on time and on
budget.
12
Experienced management and operations
team. Ocean Rig has an experienced management and
operations team with a proven track record and an average of
24 years of experience in the offshore drilling industry.
Many of the core members of Ocean Rigs management team
have worked together since 2006, and certain members of Ocean
Rigs management team have worked at leading oil-related
and shipping companies such as ExxonMobil, Statoil, Transocean
Ltd., ProSafe and Smedvig (acquired by Seadrill Limited). In
addition to the members of the management team, Ocean Rig had at
September 30, 2011, 39 employees of Ocean Rig
overseeing construction of its newbuilding drillships and will
have highly trained personnel operating the drillships once they
are delivered from the yard. Ocean Rig also had at
September 30, 2011, an onshore team of 116 people in
management functions as well as administrative and technical
staff and support functions, ranging from marketing, human
resources, accounting, finance, technical support and health,
environment, safety and quality, or HES&Q. Ocean Rig
believes the focus and dedication of its personnel in each step
of the process, from design to construction to operation, has
contributed to its track record of safety and consistently
strong operational performance.
Business
Strategy
Ocean Rigs business strategy is predicated on becoming a
leading company in the offshore ultra-deepwater drilling
industry and providing customers with safe, high quality service
and
state-of-the-art
drilling equipment. The following outlines the primary elements
of this strategy:
Create a pure play model in the ultra-deepwater
and harsh environment markets. Ocean Rigs
mission is to become the preferred offshore drilling contractor
in the ultra-deepwater and harsh environment regions of the
world and to deliver excellent performance to its clients by
exceeding their expectations for operational efficiency and
safety standards. Ocean Rig believes the Ocean Rig
Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig
Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos are, and its three
newbuilding drillships will be, among the most technologically
advanced in the world. Ocean Rig currently has an option to
purchase up to three additional newbuilding drillships and it
intends to grow its fleet over time in order to continue to meet
its customers demands while optimizing its fleet size from
an operational and logistical perspective.
Capitalize on the operating capabilities of Ocean Rigs
drilling units. Ocean Rig plans to capitalize on
the operating capabilities of its drilling units by entering
into attractive employment contracts. The focus of its marketing
effort is to maximize the benefits of the drilling units
ability to operate in ultra-deepwater drilling locations. As
described above, the Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude
are two of only 15 drilling units worldwide as of July 2011
that are technologically equipped to operate in both
ultra-deepwater and harsh environments, and its drillships will
have the capacity to drill 40,000 feet at water depths of
10,000 feet or, in the case of Ocean Rigs seventh
generation hulls, 12,000 feet with dual activity drilling
capabilities. Ocean Rig aims to secure firm employment contracts
for the drilling units at or near the highest dayrates available
in the industry at that time while balancing appropriate
contract lengths. As Ocean Rig works towards its goal of
securing firm contracts for its drilling units at attractive
dayrates, Ocean Rig believes it will be able to differentiate
itself based on its prior experience operating drilling rigs and
its safety record.
Maintain high drilling units utilization and
profitability. Ocean Rig has a proven track
record of optimizing equipment utilization. Until February 2011,
the Leiv Eiriksson was operating in the Black Sea under
the Petrobras contract and maintained a 91% earnings efficiency
from February 24, 2010 through February 3, 2011, for
the period it performed drilling operations under the contract.
The Eirik Raude has been operating offshore of Ghana
under the Tullow Oil contract and maintained a 98% earnings
efficiency from October 2008, when it commenced operations under
the contract, through March 31, 2011. Ocean Rig aims to
maximize the revenue generation of its drilling units by
maintaining its track record of high drilling unit utilization
as a result of the design capabilities of its drilling units
that can operate in harsh environmental conditions.
Capitalize on favorable industry
dynamics. Ocean Rig believes the demand for
offshore deepwater drilling units will be positively affected by
increasing global demand for oil and gas and increased
exploration and development activity in deepwater markets. The
International Energy Agency, or the IEA, projected that oil
demand for 2010 increased by 3.4% compared to 2009 levels, and
that oil demand will further increase to 89.2 million
barrels per day in 2011, an increase of 1.5% compared to 2010
levels. As the Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development, or OECD, countries resume their growth and the
major non-OECD countries continue to develop, led by China and
India, oil demand is expected to grow. Ocean Rig believes it
will become increasingly difficult to find the incremental
barrels of oil needed, due to depleting existing oil reserves.
This is expected to force
13
oil companies to continue to explore for oil farther offshore
for growing their proven reserves. According to Fearnley
Offshore AS, from 2005 to 2010, the actual spending directly
related to ultra-deepwater drilling units increased from
$4.7 billion to $19.0 billion, a compound average
growth rate, or CAGR, of 32.2%.
Continue to prioritize safety as a key focus of Ocean
Rigs operations. Ocean Rig believes safety
is of paramount importance to its customers and a key
differentiator for Ocean Rig when securing drilling contracts
from its customers. Ocean Rig has a zero incident philosophy
embedded in its corporate culture, which is reflected in its
policies and procedures. Despite operating under severely harsh
weather conditions, Ocean Rig has a proven track record of high
efficiency deepwater and ultra-deepwater drilling operations.
Ocean Rig employed 1,093 people as of September 30,
2011 and has been operating ultra-deepwater drilling rigs since
2001. Ocean Rig has extensive experience working in varying
environments and regulatory regimes across the globe, including
Eastern Canada, Angola, Congo, Ireland, the Gulf of Mexico, the
U.K., West of Shetlands, Norway, including the Barents Sea,
Ghana and Turkey.
Both of Ocean Rigs drilling rigs and one of its
drillships, the Ocean Rig Corcovado, have a valid and
updated safety case under U.K. Health and Safety Executive, or
HSE, regulations, and both of Ocean Rigs drilling rigs
hold a Norwegian sector certificate of compliance (called an
Acknowledgement of Compliance), which evidences that the rigs
and Ocean Rigs management system meet the requirements set
by the U.K. and Norwegian authorities.
Ocean Rig believes that this safety record has enabled it to
hire and retain highly-skilled employees, thereby improving its
overall operating and financial performance. Ocean Rig expects
to continue its strong commitment to safety across all of its
operations by investing in the latest technologies, performing
regular planned maintenance on its drilling units and investing
in the training and development of new safety programs for its
employees.
Implement and sustain a competitive cost
structure. Ocean Rig believes that it has a
competitive cost structure due to its operating experience and
successful employee retention policies and that its retention of
highly-skilled personnel leads to significant transferable
experience and knowledge of drilling rig operation through
deployment of seasoned crews across its fleet. By focusing on
the ultra-deepwater segment, Ocean Rig believes that it is able
to design and implement
best-in-class
processes to streamline its operations and improve efficiency.
As Ocean Rig grows, it hopes to benefit from significant
economies of scale due to an increased fleet size and a fleet of
sister-ships to its drillships, where Ocean Rig
expects to benefit from the standardization of these drilling
units, resulting in lower training and operating costs. In
addition, Ocean Rigs drillships have high-end
specifications, including advanced technology and safety
features, and, therefore, Ocean Rig expects that the need for
upgrades will be limited in the near term. Ocean Rig expects the
increase from six to nine drilling units to enable it to bring
more than one unit into a drilling region in which it operates.
To the extent Ocean Rig operates more than one drilling unit in
a drilling region, Ocean Rig expects to benefit from economies
of scale and improved logistic coordination managing more units
from the same onshore bases.
Risk
Factors
Ocean Rig faces a number of risks associated with its business
and industry and must overcome a variety of challenges to
utilize its strengths and implement its business strategy. These
risks include, among others, changes in the offshore drilling
market, including supply and demand, utilization rates,
dayrates, customer drilling programs, and commodity prices; a
downturn in the global economy; hazards inherent in the drilling
industry and marine operations resulting in liability for
personal injury or loss of life, damage to or destruction of
property and equipment, pollution or environmental damage;
inability to comply with loan covenants; inability to finance
shipyard and other capital projects; and inability to
successfully employ its drilling units.
This is not a comprehensive list of risks to which Ocean Rig is
subject, and you should carefully consider all the information
in this proxy statement / prospectus in connection
with its common shares. In particular, Ocean Rig urges you to
carefully consider the risk factors set forth in the section of
this proxy statement / prospectus entitled Risk
Factors beginning on page 29.
Industry
Overview
In recent years, the international drilling market has seen an
increasing trend towards deep and ultra-deepwater oil and gas
exploration. As shallow water resources mature, deep and
ultra-deepwater regions are expected to play an
14
increasing role in offshore oil and gas production. According to
Fearnley Offshore AS, the ultra-deepwater market has seen rapid
development over the last six years, with dayrates increasing
from approximately $180,000 in 2004 to above $600,000 in 2008,
before declining to a level of approximately $453,000 in July
2011. The ultra-deepwater market rig utilization rate has been
stable above 80% since 2000 and above 97% since 2006. The
operating units capable of drilling in ultra-deepwater depths of
greater than 7,500 feet consist mainly of fifth- and
sixth-generation units, but also include certain older upgraded
units. The in-service fleet as of July 2011 totaled
85 units, and is expected to grow to 147 units upon
the scheduled delivery of the current newbuild orderbook by the
middle of 2014. Historically, an increase in supply has caused a
decline in utilization and dayrates until drilling units are
absorbed into the market. Accordingly, dayrates have been very
cyclical. Ocean Rig believes that the largest undiscovered
offshore reserves are mostly located in ultra-deepwater fields
and primarily located in the golden triangle between
West Africa, Brazil and the Gulf of Mexico. The location of
these large offshore reserves has resulted in more than 90% of
the floater orderbook being represented by ultra-deepwater
units. Furthermore, due to increased focus on technically
challenging operations and the inherent risk of developing
offshore fields in ultra-deepwater, particularly in light of the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, oil
companies have already begun to show a preference for modern
units more capable of drilling in these harsh environments. See
The Offshore Drilling Industry.
Dividend
Policy
Ocean Rigs long-term objective is to pay a regular
dividend in support of its main objective to maximize
shareholder returns. However, Ocean Rig has not paid any
dividends in the past and it is currently focused on the
development of capital intensive projects in line with its
growth strategy and this focus will limit any dividend payment
in the medium-term. Furthermore, since Ocean Rig is a holding
company with no material assets other than the shares of its
subsidiaries through which it conducts its operations, Ocean
Rigs ability to pay dividends will depend on its
subsidiaries distributing their earnings and cash flow to it.
Some of Ocean Rigs other loan agreements limit or prohibit
its subsidiaries ability to make distributions without the
consent of its lenders.
Any future dividends declared will be at the discretion of Ocean
Rigs board of directors and will depend upon its financial
condition, earnings and other factors, including the financial
covenants contained in Ocean Rigs loan agreements and its
9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016. Ocean Rigs
ability to pay dividends is also subject to Marshall Islands
law, which generally prohibits the payment of dividends other
than from operating surplus or while a company is insolvent or
would be rendered insolvent upon the payment of such dividend.
In addition, under Ocean Rigs $800.0 million senior
secured term loan agreement, which matures in 2016, Ocean Rig is
prohibited from paying dividends without the consent of its
lenders.
Corporate
Structure
Ocean Rig is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the
Republic of the Marshall Islands on December 10, 2007 under
the name Primelead Shareholders Inc. Primelead Shareholders Inc.
was formed in December 2007 for the purpose of acquiring the
shares of Ocean Rigs predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, which was
incorporated in September 1996 under the laws of Norway. Ocean
Rig acquired control of Ocean Rig ASA on May 14, 2008.
Prior to the private placement of Ocean Rigs common shares
in December 2010, it was a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips.
As of the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
DryShips owns approximately 75% of Ocean Rigs outstanding
common shares. Each of Ocean Rigs drilling units is owned
by a separate wholly-owned subsidiary. For further information
concerning Ocean Rigs organizational structure, please see
Business Corporate Structure.
Ocean Rig maintains its principal executive offices at 10 Skopa
Street, Tribune House, 2nd Floor, Office 202, CY 1075, Nicosia,
Cyprus and Ocean Rigs telephone number at that address is
011 357 22767517. Ocean Rigs website is located at
www.ocean-rig.com. The information on Ocean Rigs website
is not a part of this proxy statement / prospectus.
Private
Offering of Common Shares
On December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig completed the sale of an
aggregate of 28,571,428 of its common shares (representing
approximately 22% of its outstanding common stock) in an
offering made to both
non-U.S.
persons in Norway in reliance on Regulation S under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and
to
15
qualified institutional buyers in the U.S. in reliance on
Rule 144A under the Securities Act, or the private
offering. A company controlled by Ocean Rigs Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. George Economou,
purchased 2,869,428 common shares, or 2.38% of its outstanding
common shares, in the private offering at the offering price of
$17.50 per share. Ocean Rig received approximately
$488.3 million of net proceeds from the private offering,
of which it used $99.0 million to purchase an option
contract from DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent company, for the
construction of up to four additional ultra-deepwater drillships
as described above. Ocean Rig applied the remaining proceeds to
partially fund remaining installment payments for its
newbuilding drillships and for general corporate purposes.
On August 26, 2011, Ocean Rig commenced an offer to exchange an
aggregate of 28,571,428 registered shares of common stock for an
equivalent number of unregistered common shares issued in the
private offering, or the Exchange Offer. On September 29,
2011, an aggregate of 28,505,786 common shares were exchanged in
the Exchange Offer.
Recent
Developments
During April 2011, Ocean Rig borrowed an aggregate of
$48.1 million from DryShips through shareholder loans for
capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. On
April 20, 2011, these intercompany loans, along with
shareholder loans of $127.5 million that Ocean Rig borrowed
from DryShips in March 2011, were fully repaid.
On April 15, 2011, Ocean Rig held a special shareholders
meeting at which its shareholders approved proposals (i) to
adopt Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation and (ii) to designate the class of each
member of Ocean Rigs board of directors and related
expiration of term of office.
On April 18, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an
$800 million senior secured term loan agreement to
partially finance the construction costs of the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia. On
April 20, 2011, Ocean Rig drew down the full amount of this
facility and prepaid its $325.0 million short-term loan
agreement.
On April 18, 2011, Ocean Rig exercised the first of its six
newbuilding drillship options under its option contract with
Samsung and, as a result, entered into a shipbuilding contract
for one of Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls and paid
$207.6 million to the shipyard on April 20, 2011.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an agreement with
the lenders under its two $562.5 million loan agreements,
or the Deutsche Bank credit facilities, to restructure these
facilities. As a result of this restructuring (i) the
maximum amount permitted to be drawn is reduced from
$562.5 million to $495.0 million under each facility,
(ii) in addition to the guarantee already provided by
DryShips, Ocean Rig provided an unlimited recourse guarantee
that includes certain financial covenants, and (iii) Ocean
Rig is permitted to draw under the facility with respect to the
Ocean Rig Poseidon based upon the employment of the
drillship under its drilling contract with Petrobras Tanzania,
and on April 27, 2010, the cash collateral deposited for
this vessel was released. On August 10, 2011, Ocean Rig
amended the terms of the credit facility for the construction of
the Ocean Rig Mykonos to allow for full drawdowns to
finance the remaining installment payments for this drillship
based on the Petrobras Brazil contract and on August 10,
2011, the cash collateral deposited for the drillship was
released. The amendment also requires that the Ocean Rig
Mykonos be re-employed under a contract acceptable to the
lenders meeting certain minimum terms and dayrates at least six
months, in lieu of 12 months, prior to the expiration of
the Petrobras Brazil contract. All other material terms of the
credit facility were unchanged.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig issued $500.0 million
aggregate principal amount of its 9.5% senior unsecured
notes due 2016 offered in a private placement. The net proceeds
of the offering of approximately $487.5 million are
expected to be used to finance Ocean Rigs newbuilding
drillships program and for general corporate purposes.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig exercised the second of six
newbuilding drillship options under its option contract with
Samsung and, as a result, entered into a shipbuilding contract
for the second of Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls and
paid $207.4 million to the shipyard on May 5, 2011.
On May 3, 2011, following the approval by Ocean Rigs
board of directors and shareholders, Ocean Rig amended and
restated its amended and restated articles of incorporation to,
among other things, increase its authorized share capital to
1,000,000,000 common shares and 500,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, each with a par value of $0.01 per share.
16
On May 5, 2011, Ocean Rig terminated its contract with
Borders & Southern for the Eirik Raude for
drilling operations offshore the Falkland Islands and entered
into a new contract with Borders & Southern for the
Leiv Eiriksson on the same terms as the original contract
for the Eirik Raude with exceptions for the fees payable
upon mobilization and demobilization and certain other terms
specific to the Leiv Eiriksson, including off-hire dates,
period surveys and technical specifications.
On May 16, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an addendum to its
option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which Samsung granted
Ocean Rig the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, for a total of up to six
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to its drillships and its seventh
generation hulls, with certain upgrades to vessel design and
specifications. Pursuant to the addendum, the two additional
newbuilding drillship options and the remaining drillship option
under the original contract may be exercised at any time on or
prior to January 31, 2012.
On May 19, 2011, Borders & Southern exercised its
option to drill an additional two wells under its contract with
Ocean Rig for the Leiv Eiriksson. Borders &
Southern assigned the two optional wells to Falkland Oil and
Gas. The maximum operating dayrate under the contract, which was
originally $540,000, decreased to $530,000 as a result of the
exercise of the optional wells. Borders & Southern has
a further option under the contract to drill a fifth well, for
which, if exercised, the dayrate would be $540,000.
On May 20, 2011, Ocean Rig paid $10.0 million to
Samsung in exchange for Samsungs agreement to deliver the
third optional newbuilding drillship by November 2013 if Ocean
Rig exercises its option to construct the drillship by
November 22, 2011 under its contract with Samsung.
On June 23, 2011, Ocean Rig exercised the third of Ocean
Rigs six newbuilding drillship options under its option
contract with Samsung and, as a result, entered into a
shipbuilding contract for the third of its seventh generation
hulls and paid $207.4 million to the shipyard.
On July 20, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into contracts with
Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos for drilling operations offshore
Brazil. The term of each contract is 1,095 days, with a
total combined value of $1.1 billion. The contract for the
Ocean Rig Mykonos is scheduled to commence in the fourth
quarter of 2011, and the contract for the Ocean Rig Corcovado
is scheduled to commence upon the expiration of the
drillships current contract with Cairn.
On July 26, 2011, DryShips and OceanFreight entered into
the merger agreement described in this proxy statement
/prospectus, pursuant to which DryShips agreed to acquire the
outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock for
consideration per share consisting of $11.25 in cash and 0.52326
of a share of Ocean Rig common stock. The Ocean Rig common
shares that will be received by the OceanFreight shareholders
will be from currently outstanding shares held by DryShips.
Based on the July 25, 2011 closing price of NOK89.00 (or
approximately $16.44 based on the NOK/USD exchange rate of
NOK5.41/$1 on July 25, 2011) for the shares of Ocean Rig common
stock on the Norwegian OTC market, the transaction consideration
reflects a total equity value for OceanFreight of approximately
$118 million and a total enterprise value of approximately
$239 million, including the assumption of debt. The
transaction has been approved by the boards of directors of
DryShips and OceanFreight, by the audit committee of the board
of directors of DryShips, which negotiated the proposed
transaction on behalf of DryShips, and by the OceanFreight
Special Committee. The shareholders of OceanFreight, other than
the entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief
Executive Officer of OceanFreight, will receive the
consideration for their shares pursuant to a merger of
OceanFreight with a subsidiary of DryShips.
Simultaneously with the execution of the merger agreement,
DryShips, entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis and
OceanFreight, entered into a separate purchase agreement. Under
the purchase agreement, DryShips acquired from the entities
controlled by Mr. Kandylidis all their OceanFreight shares,
representing a majority of the outstanding shares of
OceanFreight, for the same consideration per share that the
OceanFreight shareholders will receive in the merger. This
acquisition closed on August 24, 2011. DryShips has
committed to vote the OceanFreight shares it acquired in favor
of the merger, which requires approval by a majority vote.
Mr. Kandylidis is the son of one of the directors of
DryShips and the nephew of Mr. Economou. The Ocean Rig
shares paid by DryShips to the entities controlled by
Mr. Kandylidis are subject to a six-month
lock-up
period.
17
On July 28, 2011, Ocean Rig took delivery of its
newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the third
of Ocean Rigs four sixth-generation, advanced capability
ultra-deepwater sister drillships that are being constructed by
Samsung. In connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig
Poseidon, the final yard installment of $309.3 million
was paid, which was financed with additional drawdowns in July
2011 under the Deutsche Bank credit facility.
On August 26, 2011, Ocean Rig commenced an offer to
exchange up to 28,571,428 shares of its new common stock
that have been registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a
registration statement on
Form F-4
(Registration no. 333-175940),
or the Exchange Shares, for an equivalent number of its common
shares previously sold in a private offering in December 2010,
or the Original Shares. On September 29, 2011, an aggregate
of 28,505,786 common shares were exchanged in the Exchange Offer.
On September 12, 2011, Ocean Rig appointed a new
independent director, Mr. Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis, to
its board of directors to fill the vacancy resulting from the
resignation of Mr. Pankaj Khanna as a director. On the same
date, the Ocean Rig board of directors approved other changes to
Ocean Rigs corporate governance in connection with the
application to list Ocean Rigs common shares on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. Specifically, the Ocean Rig board of
directors approved (1) an increase in the size of the audit
committee to three members; (2) the establishment of a
compensation committee comprised of independent directors;
(3) the establishment of a nominating and corporate
governance committee comprised of independent directors;
(4) the adoption of written committee charters for each of
the audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance
committees; and (5) the adoption of a Code of Ethics that
applies to all officers, directors and employees of Ocean Rig.
The Ocean Rig board of directors has determined that each of
Mr. Akis Tsirigakis, Mr. Trygve Arnesen and
Mr. Michael Gregos are independent under the rules of the
Nasdaq Stock Market.
On September 30, 2011, Ocean Rig took delivery of its
newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Mykonos, the fourth
of its four sixth-generation, advanced capability
ultra-deepwater sister drillships that were constructed by
Samsung. In connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, the final yard installment of $305.7 million
was paid, which was financed with additional drawdowns in
September 2011 under the Deutsche Bank credit facility for the
construction of the Ocean Rig Mykonos totaling
$277.6 million.
On October 5, 2011, DryShips completed the partial spin off
of Ocean Rig by distributing an aggregate of 2,967,291 common
shares of Ocean Rig, after giving effect to the treatment of
fractional shares, on a pro rata basis to DryShips
shareholders as of the record date of September 21, 2011,
or the Spin Off. In lieu of fractional shares, DryShips
transfer agent aggregated all fractional shares that would
otherwise be distributable to DryShips shareholders and
sold a total of 105 common shares on behalf of those
shareholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a
fractional share of Ocean Rig. Following the distribution, each
such shareholder received a cash payment in an amount equal to
its pro rata share of the total net proceeds of the sale of
fractional shares.
Ocean Rig has been advised that DryShips completed the Spin Off
in order to satisfy the initial listing criteria of the NASDAQ
Global Select Market, which require that Ocean Rig have a
minimum number of round lot shareholders (shareholders who own
100 or more shares), and thereby increase the liquidity of its
shares of common stock. Ocean Rig believes that listing its
shares of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and
thereby increasing the liquidity of its shares of common stock
will benefit its shareholders by improving the ability of its
shareholders to monetize their investment by selling its common
shares, reducing volatility in the market price of its common
shares, enhancing its ability to access the capital markets and
increasing the likelihood of attracting coverage by research
analysts which, in turn, would provide additional information to
shareholders upon which to base an investment decision. In
connection with the Spin Off, Ocean Rig applied to have its
common shares listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market and on September 19, 2011, Ocean Rigs common
shares commenced when issued trading on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the ticker symbol ORIGV.
Ocean Rigs common shares commenced regular way
trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker
symbol ORIG on October 6, 2011.
On October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into drilling
contracts for the Eirik Raude for three additional wells
offshore of West Africa, with two independent oil operators
based in the United Kingdom and the United States. The total
revenue backlog, excluding mobilization cost, to complete the
three wells program is estimated at $96 million for a
period of approximately 175 days. The new contracts are
expected to commence after completion of the existing Tullow Oil
contract around mid-October.
18
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
OCEANFREIGHT
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
and other data of OceanFreight for the period from
September 11, 2006 (date of inception) through
December 31, 2006 and for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 as well as for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. You should read the notes to
OceanFreights consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of the basis on which OceanFreights
consolidated financial statements are presented. The information
provided below should be read in conjunction with Item 5
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and the
consolidated financial statements, related notes and other
financial information included in OceanFreights
Form 20-F
included as Annex D to this proxy
statement / prospectus and the other financial
information included in Annex E to this proxy statement /
prospectus.
Following the 3:1 and the 20:1 reverse stock splits effected on
June 17, 2010 and July 6, 2011, respectively, pursuant
to which every three and twenty shares, respectively, of
OceanFreights common stock issued and outstanding were
converted into one share of common stock, all share and per
share amounts in the selected consolidated financial and other
data of OceanFreight in the following table have been
retroactively restated to reflect these changes in capital
structure.
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data and average daily results)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Month Period
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenue and imputed deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
41,133
|
|
|
|
157,434
|
|
|
|
132,935
|
|
|
|
102,190
|
|
|
|
54,377
|
|
|
|
30,963
|
|
Gain/(loss) on forward freight agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
|
|
(4,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
(14,275
|
)
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
|
|
(2,616
|
)
|
|
|
(2,206
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,208
|
)
|
|
|
(28,980
|
)
|
|
|
(43,915
|
)
|
|
|
(41,078
|
)
|
|
|
(21,551
|
)
|
|
|
(12,091
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(3,460
|
)
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
(8,540
|
)
|
|
|
(8,264
|
)
|
|
|
(2,687
|
)
|
|
|
(3,903
|
)
|
Survey and drydocking costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,685
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
(5,570
|
)
|
|
|
(1,784
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,210
|
)
|
|
|
(43,658
|
)
|
|
|
(48,272
|
)
|
|
|
(24,853
|
)
|
|
|
(13,581
|
)
|
|
|
(8,253
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,176
|
)
|
|
|
(62,929
|
)
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
11,612
|
|
|
|
60,658
|
|
|
|
(164,217
|
)
|
|
|
(46,256
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,671
|
)
|
|
|
(16,528
|
)
|
|
|
(12,169
|
)
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
|
|
(3,086
|
)
|
|
|
(1,888
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,184
|
)
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
(8,713
|
)
|
|
|
(6,671
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
Net Income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
Earnings/(losses) per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
|
|
(136.4
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Earnings/(losses) per subordinated share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,221
|
|
|
|
238,691
|
|
|
|
1,309,272
|
|
|
|
3,524,427
|
|
|
|
3,155,041
|
|
|
|
4,951,336
|
|
Weighted average number of subordinated shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
102,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
184.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
23,069
|
|
|
|
37,272
|
|
|
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
11,895
|
|
|
|
19,275
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
20,711
|
|
|
|
28,677
|
|
|
|
100,299
|
|
|
|
109,754
|
|
|
|
46,001
|
|
|
|
24,237
|
|
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280
|
|
|
|
587,189
|
|
|
|
423,242
|
|
|
|
311,144
|
|
|
|
459,855
|
|
|
|
303,010
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
507,925
|
|
|
|
625,570
|
|
|
|
549,272
|
|
|
|
478,863
|
|
|
|
568,542
|
|
|
|
423,617
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
33,884
|
|
|
|
116,381
|
|
|
|
73,328
|
|
|
|
111,311
|
|
|
|
67,791
|
|
|
|
43,539
|
|
Long-term imputed deferred revenue including current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,349
|
|
|
|
16,031
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sellers credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt including current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,600
|
|
|
|
308,000
|
|
|
|
265,674
|
|
|
|
209,772
|
|
|
|
235,761
|
|
|
|
142,843
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
213,410
|
|
|
|
246,961
|
|
|
|
256,611
|
|
|
|
235,236
|
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
260,398
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Month Period
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24,434
|
|
|
|
81,369
|
|
|
|
26,552
|
|
|
|
28,449
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
Net cash flow provided by/(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(467,216
|
)
|
|
|
(120,665
|
)
|
|
|
(130,786
|
)
|
|
|
(42,678
|
)
|
|
|
(53,299
|
)
|
|
|
68,793
|
|
Net cash flow provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
461,327
|
|
|
|
42,381
|
|
|
|
118,437
|
|
|
|
(13,494
|
)
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
|
|
(64,869
|
)
|
Cash dividends per common and subordinated share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
154.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for common and subordinated stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,048
|
|
|
|
47,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,841
|
|
|
|
96,699
|
|
|
|
55,502
|
|
|
|
41,032
|
|
|
|
21,013
|
|
|
|
14,204
|
|
Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of vessels(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Number of vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Average age of fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Total calendar days for fleet(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Total voyage days for fleet(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
4,466
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
Fleet utilization(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
99.1
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
|
|
95.3
|
%
|
|
|
97.6
|
%
|
Average Daily Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter equivalent (TCE) rate(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,558
|
|
|
|
34,705
|
|
|
|
28,523
|
|
|
|
23,022
|
|
|
|
22,479
|
|
|
|
21,254
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
6,960
|
|
|
|
9,444
|
|
|
|
9,397
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
8,724
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation, loss on sale of vessels and impairment charges on
vessels. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from
operations, as determined by U.S. GAAP. OceanFreights
calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that
reported by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is included herein
because it is a basis upon which OceanFreight assesses its
liquidity position, because it is used by OceanFreights
lenders as a measure of OceanFreights compliance with
certain loan covenants and because OceanFreight believes that it
presents useful information to investors regarding its ability
to service and/or incur indebtedness. The table reconciles net
cash from operating activities, as reflected in the consolidated
statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2011, to Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
24,434
|
|
|
|
81,369
|
|
|
|
26,552
|
|
|
|
28,449
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in operating assets
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
4,881
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
(6,966
|
)
|
Net (increase)/decrease in operating liabilities
|
|
|
(7,556
|
)
|
|
|
(5,865
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
|
|
10,293
|
|
Net interest expense(*)
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
16,789
|
|
|
|
19,563
|
|
|
|
14,816
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
5,314
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,159
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
20,841
|
|
|
|
96,699
|
|
|
|
55,502
|
|
|
|
41,032
|
|
|
|
21,013
|
|
|
|
14,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Net interest expense includes the realized loss of interest rate
swaps included in Loss on derivative instrument in
the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Average number of vessels is the number of vessels that
constituted the fleet for the relevant period, as measured by
the sum of the number of days each vessel was a part of the
fleet during the period divided by the number of calendar days
in the related period. |
|
(3) |
|
Calendar days are the total days the vessels were in
OceanFreights possession for the relevant period including
off-hire and drydock days. |
20
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Total voyage days for the fleet are the total days during which
the vessels were in OceanFreights possession for the
relevant period, net of off-hire days. |
|
(5) |
|
Fleet utilization is the percentage of time that the vessels
were available for revenue generating voyage days, and is
determined by dividing voyage days by fleet calendar days for
the relevant period. |
|
(6) |
|
Time charter equivalent, or TCE, is a measure of the average
daily revenue performance of a vessel on a per voyage basis.
OceanFreights method of calculating TCE is consistent with
industry standards and is determined by dividing voyage
revenues (net of voyage expenses) by voyage days for the
relevant time period. Voyage expenses primarily consist of port,
canal and fuel costs that are unique to a particular voyage,
which would otherwise be paid by the charterer under a time
charter contract, as well as commissions. TCE is a standard
shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare
period-to-period
changes in a shipping companys performance despite changes
in the mix of charter types (i.e., spot charters, time charters
and bareboat charters) under which the vessels may be employed
between the periods. |
|
(7) |
|
Daily vessel operating expenses, which include vessel management
fees, crew costs, provisions, deck and engine stores,
lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs, are
calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by fleet
calendar days for the relevant time period. |
21
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF OCEAN
RIG
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial and other data of Ocean Rig, at the dates and for the
periods indicated. Ocean Rig was incorporated on
December 10, 2007 under the name Primelead Shareholders
Inc. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of
June 30, 2011 and for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 and as of and for Ocean Rigs
fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is
derived from the unaudited and audited financial statements and
related notes of Ocean Rig and its subsidiaries
(successor) appearing elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus. The selected historical
consolidated financial and other data of Ocean Rig ASA and its
subsidiaries (predecessor) as of and for the period
from January 1 to May 14, 2008 is derived from the audited
financial statements of Ocean Rig ASA appearing elsewhere in
this proxy statement / prospectus. Included elsewhere
in this proxy statement / prospectus is Ocean
Rigs unaudited pro forma condensed statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The selected
historical consolidated financial data as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2007 is derived from the audited
financial statements of Ocean Rig ASA not included in this proxy
statement / prospectus. In accordance with
Item 3.A.1 of
Form 20-F,
Ocean Rig is omitting fiscal year 2006 from the selected
historical consolidated financial data as Ocean Rig did not
report consolidated financial statements in compliance with
U.S. GAAP for 2006 and such information cannot be provided
without unreasonable effort or expense.
You should read the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of the basis on which the
consolidated financial statements are presented. The selected
historical consolidated financial and other data should be read
in conjunction with the sections of this proxy
statement / prospectus entitled
Business History of Ocean Rig and
Ocean Rig Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Ocean
Rigs unaudited and audited consolidated financial
statements, the related notes thereto and other Ocean Rig
financial information appearing elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus. The consolidated financial
statements of Ocean Rig as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009 were restated, which impacted interest
and finance cost, income before taxes, net income, earnings per
common share, basic and diluted, rigs under construction, total
assets, stockholders equity and net cash provided by
operating and financing activities. See Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements.
(U.S.
Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig ASA
|
|
|
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009, as
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income statement data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and service revenue
|
|
$
|
209,095
|
|
|
$
|
99,172
|
|
|
$
|
202,110
|
|
|
$
|
373,525
|
|
|
$
|
403,162
|
|
|
$
|
189,838
|
|
|
$
|
236,657
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,553
|
|
|
|
14,597
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
209,095
|
|
|
|
99,172
|
|
|
|
218,663
|
|
|
|
388,122
|
|
|
|
405,712
|
|
|
|
189,228
|
|
|
|
235,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
123,543
|
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
86,229
|
|
|
|
133,256
|
|
|
|
119.369
|
|
|
|
59,508
|
|
|
|
104,137
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,239
|
|
|
|
19,367
|
|
|
|
45,432
|
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
75,092
|
|
|
|
37,966
|
|
|
|
64,908
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14,062
|
|
|
|
12,140
|
|
|
|
14,462
|
|
|
|
17,955
|
|
|
|
19,443
|
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
190,844
|
|
|
|
79,651
|
|
|
|
907,852
|
|
|
|
226,559
|
|
|
|
215,362
|
|
|
|
107,979
|
|
|
|
184,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig ASA
|
|
|
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009, as
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
18,251
|
|
|
|
19,521
|
|
|
|
(689,189
|
)
|
|
|
161,563
|
|
|
|
190,350
|
|
|
|
81,249
|
|
|
|
51,093
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(60,630
|
)
|
|
|
(41,661
|
)
|
|
|
(71,692
|
)
|
|
|
(46,120
|
)
|
|
|
(8,418
|
)
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(22,214
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
|
|
(34,501
|
)
|
|
|
(18,616
|
)
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
(3,752
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance expenses, net
|
|
|
(58,955
|
)
|
|
|
(41,280
|
)
|
|
|
(70,959
|
)
|
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
|
|
(35,153
|
)
|
|
|
(38,166
|
)
|
|
|
(30,882
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before taxes
|
|
|
(40,704
|
)
|
|
|
(21,759
|
)
|
|
|
(760,148
|
)
|
|
|
128,551
|
|
|
|
155,197
|
|
|
|
43,083
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
Income/(loss) taxes
|
|
|
(6,683
|
)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
(2,844
|
)
|
|
|
(12,797
|
)
|
|
|
(20,436
|
)
|
|
|
(11,938
|
)
|
|
|
(9,778
|
)
|
Equity in income/(loss) of investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(47,387
|
)
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
(764,047
|
)
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
31,145
|
|
|
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(47,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
134,761
|
|
|
$
|
31,145
|
|
|
$
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig ASA
|
|
|
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009, as
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
272,940
|
|
|
$
|
234,195
|
|
|
$
|
95,707
|
|
|
$
|
191,744
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
62,646
|
|
|
|
96,471
|
|
|
|
93,379
|
|
|
|
324,363
|
|
|
|
576,299
|
|
|
|
252,251
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
93,648
|
|
|
|
96,471
|
|
|
|
366,319
|
|
|
|
558,558
|
|
|
|
672,006
|
|
|
|
443,995
|
|
Drilling rigs, machinery and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,141,771
|
|
|
|
1,132,867
|
|
|
|
1,377,359
|
|
|
|
1,317,607
|
|
|
|
1,249,333
|
|
|
|
2,940,888
|
|
Intangibles, asset, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,391
|
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
Other non current assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
43,480
|
|
|
|
523,363
|
|
|
|
221,011
|
|
Rigs under construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178,392
|
|
|
|
1,888,490
|
|
|
|
1,704,350
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,235,426
|
|
|
|
1,229,338
|
|
|
|
1,760,681
|
|
|
|
3,109,985
|
|
|
|
4,343,698
|
|
|
|
5,320,028
|
|
Current liabilities, including current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
147,810
|
|
|
|
538,679
|
|
|
|
885,039
|
|
|
|
682,287
|
|
|
|
667,918
|
|
|
|
434,591
|
|
Total long term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
656,548
|
|
|
|
281,307
|
|
|
|
788,314
|
|
|
|
662,362
|
|
|
|
697,797
|
|
|
|
1,891,319
|
|
Other non current liabilities
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
63,697
|
|
|
|
64,219
|
|
|
|
96,901
|
|
|
|
89,128
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
805,538
|
|
|
|
822,456
|
|
|
|
1,737,050
|
|
|
|
1,408,868
|
|
|
|
1,462,616
|
|
|
|
2,415,038
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
429,888
|
|
|
|
406,882
|
|
|
|
23,631
|
|
|
|
1,701,117
|
|
|
|
2,881,082
|
|
|
|
2,904,990
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,235,426
|
|
|
$
|
1,229,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,760,681
|
|
|
$
|
3,109,985
|
|
|
$
|
4,343,698
|
|
|
$
|
5,320,028
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig ASA
|
|
|
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009, as
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except for operating data)
|
|
|
Cash flow data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
35,455
|
|
|
$
|
(29,089
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,119
|
|
|
$
|
211,075
|
|
|
$
|
221,798
|
|
|
$
|
99,055
|
|
|
$
|
93,915
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(48,507
|
)
|
|
|
(10,463
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020,673
|
)
|
|
|
(146,779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,441,347
|
)
|
|
|
(521,161
|
)
|
|
|
(850,837
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(47,611
|
)
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
1,257,390
|
|
|
|
(103,041
|
)
|
|
|
1,081,061
|
|
|
|
341,710
|
|
|
|
852,959
|
|
Other financial data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1) (unaudited)
|
|
|
69,931
|
|
|
|
38,888
|
|
|
|
(648,912
|
)
|
|
|
243,760
|
|
|
|
226,243
|
|
|
|
80,962
|
|
|
|
96,939
|
|
Cash paid for interest (unaudited)
|
|
|
55,524
|
|
|
|
22,628
|
|
|
|
23,103
|
|
|
|
51,093
|
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
|
|
16,511
|
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
Capital expenditures (unaudited)
|
|
|
(48,507
|
)
|
|
|
(10,463
|
)
|
|
|
(16,584
|
)
|
|
|
(14,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,834
|
)
|
|
|
(3,671
|
)
|
|
|
(10,009
|
)
|
Payments for drillships under construction (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,896
|
)
|
|
|
(705,022
|
)
|
|
|
(483,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,187,747
|
)
|
Operating data, when on hire (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating units
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Average earning efficiency %
|
|
|
88.0
|
%
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
|
|
88.7
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
92.7
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
92.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is a
non-U.S.
GAAP measure and does not represent and should not be considered
as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations, as
determined by GAAP, and Ocean Rigs calculation of EBITDA
may not be comparable to that reported by other companies.
EBITDA is included herein because it is a basis upon which Ocean
Rig measures its operations and efficiency. EBITDA is also used
by Ocean Rigs lenders as a measure of its compliance with
certain loan covenants and because Ocean Rig believes that it
presents useful information to investors regarding a
companys ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig ASA
|
|
|
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
Six-Month
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009, as
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted financial data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA reconciliation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(47,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
(765,047
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
134,761
|
|
|
$
|
31,145
|
|
|
$
|
10,433
|
|
Add: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,239
|
|
|
|
19,367
|
|
|
|
45,432
|
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
75,092
|
|
|
|
37,966
|
|
|
|
64,908
|
|
Add: Net interest expense
|
|
|
57,396
|
|
|
|
41,280
|
|
|
|
68,659
|
|
|
|
39,861
|
|
|
|
(4,046
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
11,820
|
|
Add: Income taxes
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
20,436
|
|
|
|
11,938
|
|
|
|
9,778
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
69,931
|
|
|
$
|
38,888
|
|
|
$
|
(648,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
243,760
|
|
|
$
|
226,243
|
|
|
$
|
80,962
|
|
|
$
|
96,939
|
|
24
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The following tables present, as at the dates and for the
periods indicated, selected historical per share financial
information of OceanFreight and Ocean Rig.
You should read this information in conjunction with, and the
information is qualified in its entirety by, the respective
audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes of OceanFreight and Ocean Rig included
elsewhere in this proxy statement / prospectus and the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and
accompanying notes related to such combined financial statements
included elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus.
OceanFreight
and Ocean Rig Historical Common Share Data
The following table presents the earnings per share, dividends
per share and book value per share with respect to OceanFreight
and Ocean Rig respectively on a historical basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the
|
|
As at and for the
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Basic Earnings (Losses) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight historical
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17.40
|
)
|
Ocean Rig historical
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Losses) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight historical
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17.40
|
)
|
Ocean Rig historical
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
Dividends Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight historical
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Ocean Rig historical
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Book Value Per Share at Period End:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight historical
|
|
$
|
43.79
|
|
|
$
|
56.50
|
|
Ocean Rig historical
|
|
$
|
22.06
|
|
|
$
|
21.88
|
|
25
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE MARKET PRICE INFORMATION
OceanFreight common shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the trading symbol OCNF. Ocean Rig
common stock is traded over the Norwegian OTC market under the
trading symbol OCRG. Also, on October 6, 2011,
Ocean Rig common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol ORIG. The following
table sets forth, for the respective calendar year and quarters
indicated, the high and low sale prices of Ocean Rig common
shares and the high and low sale prices per share of
OceanFreight common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
|
Common Stock*
|
|
Common Stock**
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
Quarterly for 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
Quarterly for 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.67
|
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.86
|
|
|
$
|
17.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.13
|
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
18.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
The table below sets forth the high and low sale prices for each
of the respective calendar months indicated for Ocean Rig common
stock and OceanFreight common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
|
Common Stock*
|
|
Common Stock**
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
November 2010
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
December 2010
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
January 2011
|
|
$
|
20.28
|
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
February 2011
|
|
$
|
21.30
|
|
|
$
|
19.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
March 2011
|
|
$
|
22.67
|
|
|
$
|
20.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
April 2011
|
|
$
|
21.86
|
|
|
$
|
20.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
May 2011
|
|
$
|
21.62
|
|
|
$
|
19.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
June 2011
|
|
$
|
19.64
|
|
|
$
|
17.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
July 2011
|
|
$
|
18.13
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
17.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
August 2011
|
|
$
|
16.69
|
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
17.01
|
|
|
$
|
11.46
|
|
September 2011
|
|
$
|
16.78
|
|
|
$
|
14.66
|
|
|
$
|
18.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.17
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As reported in U.S. Dollars by Bloomberg, which reports are
based upon the historical NOK/USD rate (see Currency
Exchange Rate Data). |
|
** |
|
OceanFreight conducted 1 for 3 and 1 for 20 reverse stock splits
on June 17, 2010 and July 6, 2011, respectively. The
figures set forth in this table have not retroactively been
adjusted to reflect these stock splits. |
Following the completion of the merger, there will be no further
market for shares of OceanFreight common stock.
The table below sets forth the closing prices of OceanFreight
common stock and Ocean Rig common stock and the implied per
share value in the merger to holders of OceanFreight common
stock, on July 25, 2011, the last trading day before the
public announcement of the merger, and on October 11, 2011,
the last practicable trading day before the distribution of this
proxy statement / prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
Implied Value of One
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Common
|
|
Share of OceanFreight
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Common Stock(1)
|
|
July 25, 2011
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.44(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
19.85
|
|
October 11, 2011
|
|
$
|
18.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.75(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
19.49
|
|
26
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The implied value per share reflects the value of shares of
Ocean Rig common stock that holders of OceanFreight common stock
would receive in exchange for each share of OceanFreight common
stock if the merger were completed on the date indicated. Such
price reflects the 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock
that OceanFreight stockholders will be entitled to receive for
each share of OceanFreight common stock in the merger and a cash
payment in the amount of $11.25 per share. Holders of
OceanFreight common stock will also receive cash in lieu of any
fractional share interests. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Last traded value on the Norwegian OTC market, as converted to
U.S. Dollars based on the NOK / USD exchange rate on
July 25, 2011. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. |
27
CURRENCY
EXCHANGE RATE DATA
The following tables show, for the date or periods indicated,
certain information regarding the
U.S. Dollar / Norwegian Kroner exchange rate and
the Norwegian Kroner / U.S. Dollar exchange rate
as reported by Bloomberg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK per USD$1
|
|
USD$ per NOK1
|
|
July 25, 2011
|
|
NOK5.4154
|
|
USD$0.1847
|
(closing price as of the last trading date before public
announcement of the transaction between OceanFreight and
DryShips)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average*
|
|
|
NOK per USD$1
|
|
USD$ per NOK1
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
NOK6.4107
|
|
USD$0.1562
|
2007
|
|
5.8587
|
|
0.1712
|
2008
|
|
5.6488
|
|
0.1796
|
2009
|
|
6.2861
|
|
0.1600
|
2010
|
|
6.0448
|
|
0.1656
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
5.7196
|
|
0.1749
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
5.5782
|
|
0.1794
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
5.5531
|
|
0.1802
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The average rate means the average of the daily closing prices
during the relevant period as reported by Bloomberg. |
The following tables, for the months indicated, shows the high
and low U.S. Dollar/ Norwegian Kroner exchange rate and
Norwegian Kroner / U.S. Dollar exchange rate as
reported by Bloomberg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK per USD$1
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
January 2011
|
|
NOK6.0056
|
|
NOK5.7319
|
February 2011
|
|
5.8848
|
|
5.5604
|
March 2011
|
|
5.7234
|
|
5.5081
|
April 2011
|
|
5.5639
|
|
5.2304
|
May 2011
|
|
5.6302
|
|
5.2174
|
June 2011
|
|
5.5964
|
|
5.3235
|
July 2011
|
|
5.6318
|
|
5.3358
|
August 2011
|
|
5.5807
|
|
5.3309
|
September 2011
|
|
5.9130
|
|
5.3144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD$ per NOK1
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
January 2011
|
|
USD$0.1745
|
|
USD$0.1665
|
February 2011
|
|
0.1798
|
|
0.1699
|
March 2011
|
|
0.1816
|
|
0.1747
|
April 2011
|
|
0.1912
|
|
0.1797
|
May 2011
|
|
0.1917
|
|
0.1776
|
June 2011
|
|
0.1878
|
|
0.1787
|
July 2011
|
|
0.1874
|
|
0.1776
|
August 2011
|
|
0.1876
|
|
0.1792
|
September 2011
|
|
0.1882
|
|
0.1691
|
28
RISK
FACTORS
The merger, the drilling industry, the Ocean Rig business and
holding shares of Ocean Rig common stock involve a high degree
of risk. By voting in favor of the proposals submitted to
current OceanFreight shareholders, you will be choosing to
invest in shares of Ocean Rig common stock. An investment in
shares of Ocean Rig common stock involves a high degree of risk.
In addition to the other information contained in this proxy
statement / prospectus, including the matters under
the section entitled Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements, you should carefully consider
all of the following risk factors relating to the proposed
merger, the drilling industry, the Ocean Rig business and shares
of Ocean Rig common stock.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Merger
Because
the market price of shares of Ocean Rig common stock may
fluctuate, you cannot be certain of the precise value of the
merger consideration that you will receive in the
merger.
The value of the portion of the merger consideration comprised
of shares of Ocean Rig common stock to be received at closing
will vary depending on the market price of shares of Ocean Rig
common stock on the date of the closing of the merger.
In addition, the prices of shares of Ocean Rig common stock and
shares of OceanFreight common stock at the closing of the merger
may vary from their respective prices on the date the merger
agreement was executed, on the date of this proxy
statement / prospectus and on the date of the special
meeting.
See Comparative Per Share Market Price Information
for certain historical market price information of the shares of
Ocean Rig common stock and OceanFreight common stock.
These variations in stock prices may be the result of various
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the dry bulk charter market and in values of dry bulk
vessels;
|
|
|
|
changes in the international offshore drilling or offshore oil
and gas exploration, development and production drilling
industry (for additional risk factors relating to Ocean
Rigs industry see Risk Factors Risk
Factors Relating to the Drilling Industry).
|
|
|
|
changes in the business prospects of OceanFreight or Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
governmental, regulatory
and/or
litigation developments;
|
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when the merger will be
consummated;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
increased competition in the respective markets; and
|
|
|
|
general market, economic and political conditions.
|
At the time of the special meeting, holders of OceanFreight
common stock will not know the precise value of the merger
consideration they will be entitled to receive for their shares
of OceanFreight common stock on the day the merger closes.
Holders of OceanFreight common stock are urged to obtain a
current market quotation for OceanFreight common stock and Ocean
Rig common stock.
The
market price for OceanFreight common stock may be affected by
factors different from those affecting the shares of Ocean Rig
common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, holders of shares of OceanFreight
common stock will be entitled to become holders of shares of
Ocean Rig common stock. OceanFreights businesses differ
from those of Ocean Rig, and accordingly the results of
operations of Ocean Rig will be affected by factors different
from those currently affecting the results of operations of
OceanFreight. For a discussion of the businesses of OceanFreight
and Ocean Rig and of other factors to consider in connection
with those businesses, you should carefully review this document
and the documents included as Annexes to this proxy
statement / prospectus.
29
Certain
of OceanFreight executive officers have interests in the merger
that differ from, or are in addition to, the interests of
holders of shares of OceanFreight common stock.
Certain of OceanFreights executive officers and directors
have financial interests in the merger that are different from,
or in addition to, the interests of OceanFreight shareholders.
In particular, companies owned by OceanFreights Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Kandylidis, which held approximately
50.5% of the common stock of OceanFreight, agreed to sell their
shares to DryShips in advance of the merger, and
Mr. Kandylidis and other officers are entitled to
compensation on a change of control of OceanFreight on
completion of the merger. For a detailed discussion of the
interests that OceanFreights directors and executive
officers may have in the merger, please see The
Transaction Interests of OceanFreights
Directors and Officers in the Merger.
The
merger agreement contains provisions that could discourage a
potential competing acquirer of OceanFreight or could result in
any competing proposal being at a lower price than it might
otherwise be.
The merger agreement contains no shop provisions
that, subject to certain exceptions, restrict
OceanFreights ability to solicit, encourage, facilitate or
discuss competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a
significant part of OceanFreight. Further, even if the
OceanFreight board of directors withdraws or qualifies its
recommendation in favor of adopting the merger agreement,
OceanFreight will still be required to submit the matter to a
vote of the OceanFreight shareholders at the OceanFreight
special meeting, unless the merger agreement is terminated. In
addition, DryShips generally has an opportunity to offer to
modify the terms of the proposed merger in response to any
competing acquisition proposal that may be made before the
OceanFreight board of directors may withdraw or qualify its
recommendation. In some circumstances upon termination of the
merger agreement, OceanFreight may be required to pay to
DryShips a termination fee of $4.5 million. Since
August 23, 2011, OceanFreight is prohibited from responding
to any competing third-party proposals and is not permitted to
terminate the merger agreement to enter into a definitive
agreement with respect to any superior proposal.
These provisions could discourage a potential competing acquirer
that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant
part of OceanFreight from considering or proposing that
acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with
a higher per share cash or market value than that market value
proposed to be received or realized in the merger, or might
result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a
lower price than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because
of the added expense of the termination fee that may become
payable in certain circumstances.
OceanFreight
shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest
in Ocean Rig after the merger and will exercise less influence
over management.
OceanFreight shareholders currently have the right to vote in
the election of directors of OceanFreight and on certain other
matters affecting OceanFreight. Following the merger, each
holder of shares of OceanFreight common stock will be entitled
to become a shareholder of Ocean Rig with a percentage ownership
of Ocean Rig that is much smaller than the shareholders
percentage ownership of OceanFreight. It is expected that the
former shareholders of OceanFreight as a group will own
approximately 2.3% of the outstanding shares of Ocean Rig common
stock immediately after the completion of the merger. Because of
this, OceanFreights shareholders will have substantially
less influence on the management and policies of Ocean Rig than
they now have with respect to the management and policies of
OceanFreight.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Drilling Industry
The
Ocean Rig business in the offshore drilling sector depends on
the level of activity in the offshore oil and gas industry,
which is significantly affected by, among other things, volatile
oil and gas prices and may be materially and adversely affected
by a decline in the offshore oil and gas industry.
The offshore contract drilling industry is cyclical and
volatile. Ocean Rigs business in the offshore drilling
sector depends on the level of activity in oil and gas
exploration, development and production in offshore areas
worldwide. The availability of quality drilling prospects,
exploration success, relative production costs, the stage of
reservoir development and political and regulatory environments
affect customers drilling programs. Oil and gas
30
prices and market expectations of potential changes in these
prices also significantly affect this level of activity and
demand for drilling units.
Oil and gas prices are extremely volatile and are affected by
numerous factors beyond Ocean Rigs control, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
worldwide production and demand for oil and gas;
|
|
|
|
the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering
oil and gas;
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding future energy prices;
|
|
|
|
advances in exploration, development and production technology;
|
|
|
|
the ability of OPEC to set and maintain levels and pricing;
|
|
|
|
the level of production in non-OPEC countries;
|
|
|
|
government regulations;
|
|
|
|
local and international political, economic and weather
conditions;
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign tax policies;
|
|
|
|
development and exploitation of alternative fuels;
|
|
|
|
the policies of various governments regarding exploration and
development of their oil and gas reserves; and
|
|
|
|
the worldwide military and political environment, including
uncertainty or instability resulting from an escalation or
additional outbreak of armed hostilities, insurrection or other
crises in the Middle East or other geographic areas or further
acts of terrorism in the United States, or elsewhere.
|
Declines in oil and gas prices for an extended period of time,
or market expectations of potential decreases in these prices,
could negatively affect Ocean Rigs business in the
offshore drilling sector. Crude oil inventories remain at high
levels compared to historical levels, which may place downward
pressure on the price of crude oil and demand for offshore
drilling units. Sustained periods of low oil prices typically
result in reduced exploration and drilling because oil and gas
companies capital expenditure budgets are subject to their
cash flow and are therefore sensitive to changes in energy
prices. These changes in commodity prices can have a dramatic
effect on rig demand, and periods of low demand can cause excess
rig supply and intensify the competition in the industry which
often results in drilling units, particularly lower
specification drilling units, being idle for long periods of
time. Ocean Rig cannot predict the future level of demand for
its services or future conditions of the oil and gas industry.
Any decrease in exploration, development or production
expenditures by oil and gas companies could reduce Ocean
Rigs revenues and materially harm its business and results
of operations.
In addition to oil and gas prices, the offshore drilling
industry is influenced by additional factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of competing offshore drilling vessels;
|
|
|
|
the level of costs for associated offshore oilfield and
construction services;
|
|
|
|
oil and gas transportation costs;
|
|
|
|
the discovery of new oil and gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
the cost of non-conventional hydrocarbons, such as the
exploitation of oil sands; and
|
|
|
|
regulatory restrictions on offshore drilling.
|
Any of these factors could reduce demand for Ocean Rigs
services and adversely affect Ocean Rigs business and
results of operations.
31
Any
renewal of the recent worldwide economic downturn could have a
material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs revenue,
profitability and financial position.
There is considerable instability in the world economy and in
the economies of countries such as Greece, Spain, Portugal,
Ireland and Italy which could initiate a new economic downturn,
or introduce volatility in the global markets. A decrease in
global economic activity would likely reduce worldwide demand
for energy and result in an extended period of lower crude oil
and natural gas prices. In addition, continued hostilities and
insurrections in the Middle East and the occurrence or threat of
terrorist attacks against the United States or other countries
could adversely affect the economies of the United States and of
other countries. Any prolonged reduction in crude oil and
natural gas prices would depress the levels of exploration,
development and production activity. Moreover, even during
periods of high commodity prices, customers may cancel or
curtail their drilling programs, or reduce their levels of
capital expenditures for exploration and production for a
variety of reasons, including their lack of success in
exploration efforts. These factors could cause Ocean Rigs
revenues and margins to decline, decrease daily rates and
utilization of Ocean Rigs drilling units and limit its
future growth prospects. Any significant decrease in daily rates
or utilization of Ocean Rig drilling units could materially
reduce its revenues and profitability. In addition, any
instability in the financial and insurance markets, as
experienced in the recent financial and credit crisis, could
make it more difficult for Ocean Rig to access capital and to
obtain insurance coverage that Ocean Rig considers adequate or
are otherwise required by its contracts.
The
offshore drilling industry is highly competitive with intense
price competition, and as a result, Ocean Rig may be unable to
compete successfully with other providers of contract drilling
services that have greater resources than Ocean Rig
has.
The offshore contract drilling industry is highly competitive
with several industry participants, none of which has a dominant
market share, and is characterized by high capital and
maintenance requirements. Drilling contracts are traditionally
awarded on a competitive bid basis. Price competition is often
the primary factor in determining which qualified contractor is
awarded the drilling contract, although drilling unit
availability, location and suitability, the quality and
technical capability of service and equipment, reputation and
industry standing are key factors which are considered. Mergers
among oil and natural gas exploration and production companies
have reduced, and may from time to time further reduce, the
number of available customers, which would increase the ability
of potential customers to achieve pricing terms favorable to
them.
Many of Ocean Rigs competitors in the offshore drilling
industry are significantly larger than Ocean Rig are and have
more diverse drilling assets and significantly greater financial
and other resources than Ocean Rig has. In addition, because of
the relatively small size of its drilling segment, Ocean Rig may
be unable to take advantage of economies of scale to the same
extent as some of its larger competitors. Given the high capital
requirements that are inherent in the offshore drilling
industry, Ocean Rig may also be unable to invest in new
technologies or expand its drilling segment in the future as may
be necessary for it to succeed in this industry, while Ocean
Rigs larger competitors with superior financial resources,
and in many cases less leverage than Ocean Rig, may be able to
respond more rapidly to changing market demands and compete more
efficiently on price for drillship and drilling rig employment.
Ocean Rig may not be able to maintain its competitive position,
and Ocean Rig believes that competition for contracts will
continue to be intense in the future. Ocean Rigs inability
to compete successfully may reduce its revenues and
profitability.
An
over-supply of drilling units may lead to a reduction in
dayrates and therefore may materially impact Ocean Rigs
profitability in its offshore drilling segment.
During the recent period of high utilization and high dayrates,
industry participants have increased the supply of drilling
units by ordering the construction of new drilling units.
Historically, this has resulted in an over-supply of drilling
units and has caused a subsequent decline in utilization and
dayrates when the drilling units enter the market, sometimes for
extended periods of time until the units have been absorbed into
the active fleet. According to Fearnley Offshore AS, the
worldwide fleet of ultra-deepwater drilling units as of July
2011 consisted of 85 units, comprised of 44
semi-submersible rigs and 41 drillships. An additional 17
semi-submersible rigs and 45 drillships are under construction
or on order as of July 2011, which would bring the total fleet
to 147 drilling units by the middle of 2014. A relatively large
number of the drilling units currently under construction have
been contracted for
32
future work, which may intensify price competition as scheduled
delivery dates occur. The entry into service of these new,
upgraded or reactivated drilling units will increase supply and
has already led to a reduction in dayrates as drilling units are
absorbed into the active fleet. In addition, the new
construction of high-specification rigs, as well as changes in
its competitors drilling rig fleets, could require Ocean
Rig to make material additional capital investments to keep its
fleet competitive. Lower utilization and dayrates could
adversely affect Ocean Rigs revenues and profitability.
Prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates could also
result in the recognition of impairment charges on its drilling
units if future cash flow estimates, based upon information
available to Ocean Rigs management at the time, indicate
that the carrying value of these drilling units may not be
recoverable.
Consolidation
of suppliers may increase the cost of obtaining supplies, which
may have a material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs results
of operations and financial condition.
Ocean Rig relies on certain third parties to provide supplies
and services necessary for its offshore drilling operations,
including but not limited to drilling equipment suppliers,
catering and machinery suppliers. Recent mergers have reduced
the number of available suppliers, resulting in fewer
alternatives for sourcing key supplies. Such consolidation,
combined with a high volume of drilling units under
construction, may result in a shortage of supplies and services
thereby increasing the cost of supplies
and/or
potentially inhibiting the ability of suppliers to deliver on
time. These cost increases or delays could have a material
adverse effect on Ocean Rigs results of operations and
result in rig downtime, and delays in the repair and maintenance
of its drilling rigs.
Ocean
Rigs international operations in the offshore drilling
sector involve additional risks, including piracy, which could
adversely affect Ocean Rigs business.
Ocean Rig operates in various regions throughout the world.
Ocean Rigs two existing drilling rigs, the Leiv
Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude, are currently
operating offshore of Greenland and Ghana, respectively, and
Ocean Rigs drillship, the Ocean Rig Corcovado,
commenced drilling and related operations in Greenland in May
2011 and is scheduled to commence a contract for drilling
operations offshore Brazil upon the expiration of the
drillships current contract. On March 31, 2011,
directly upon its delivery, the Ocean Rig Olympia
commenced contracts for exploration drilling offshore of
Ghana and Cote DIvoire. In addition, the Ocean Rig
Poseidon commenced a contract on July 29, 2011,
directly upon its delivery, for drilling offshore of Tanzania
and West Africa and the Ocean Rig Mykonos is scheduled to
commence a contract in the fourth quarter of 2011 for drilling
operations offshore Brazil. In the past Ocean Rig has operated
the Eirik Raude in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore of
Canada, Norway, the U.K., and Ghana, while the Leiv Eiriksson
has operated offshore of West Africa, Turkey, Ireland, west
of the Shetland Islands and in the North Sea. As a result of
Ocean Rigs international operations, Ocean Rig may be
exposed to political and other uncertainties, including risks of:
|
|
|
|
|
terrorist acts, armed hostilities, war and civil disturbances;
|
|
|
|
acts of piracy, which have historically affected ocean-going
vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China
Sea and in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and which
have increased significantly in frequency since 2008,
particularly in the Gulf of Aden and off the west coast of
Africa;
|
|
|
|
significant governmental influence over many aspects of local
economies;
|
|
|
|
seizure, nationalization or expropriation of property or
equipment;
|
|
|
|
repudiation, nullification, modification or renegotiation of
contracts;
|
|
|
|
limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage, in
certain areas;
|
|
|
|
political unrest;
|
|
|
|
foreign and U.S. monetary policy and foreign currency
fluctuations and devaluations;
|
|
|
|
the inability to repatriate income or capital;
|
|
|
|
complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment
in remote locations;
|
|
|
|
import-export quotas, wage and price controls, imposition of
trade barriers;
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign
bureaucratic actions;
|
|
|
|
changing taxation policies, including confiscatory taxation;
|
|
|
|
other forms of government regulation and economic conditions
that are beyond its control; and
|
|
|
|
governmental corruption.
|
In addition, international contract drilling operations are
subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which
Ocean Rig operates, including laws and regulations relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
the equipping and operation of drilling units;
|
|
|
|
repatriation of foreign earnings;
|
|
|
|
oil and gas exploration and development;
|
|
|
|
taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate
personnel; and
|
|
|
|
use and compensation of local employees and suppliers by foreign
contractors.
|
Some foreign governments favor or effectively require
(i) the awarding of drilling contracts to local contractors
or to drilling rigs owned by their own citizens, (ii) the
use of a local agent or (iii) foreign contractors to employ
citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular
jurisdiction. These practices may adversely affect Ocean
Rigs ability to compete in those regions. It is difficult
to predict what governmental regulations may be enacted in the
future that could adversely affect the international drilling
industry. The actions of foreign governments, including
initiatives by OPEC, may adversely affect Ocean Rigs
ability to compete. Failure to comply with applicable laws and
regulations, including those relating to sanctions and export
restrictions, may subject Ocean Rig to criminal sanctions or
civil remedies, including fines, denial of export privileges,
injunctions or seizures of assets.
Ocean
Rigs business and operations involve numerous operating
hazards.
Ocean Rigs operations are subject to hazards inherent in
the drilling industry, such as blowouts, reservoir damage, loss
of production, loss of well control, lost or stuck drill
strings, equipment defects, punch throughs, craterings, fires,
explosions and pollution, including spills similar to the events
on April 20, 2010 related to the Deepwater Horizon,
in which Ocean Rig was not involved. Contract drilling and well
servicing require the use of heavy equipment and exposure to
hazardous conditions, which may subject Ocean Rig to liability
claims by employees, customers and third parties. These hazards
can cause personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or
destruction of property and equipment, pollution or
environmental damage, claims by third parties or customers and
suspension of operations. Ocean Rigs offshore drilling
segment is also subject to hazards inherent in marine
operations, either while
on-site or
during mobilization, such as capsizing, sinking, grounding,
collision, damage from severe weather and marine life
infestations. Operations may also be suspended because of
machinery breakdowns, abnormal drilling conditions, and failure
of subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services, or
personnel shortages. Ocean Rig customarily provides contract
indemnity to its customers for claims that could be asserted by
Ocean Rig relating to damage to or loss of its equipment,
including rigs and claims that could be asserted by Ocean Rig or
its employees relating to personal injury or loss of life.
Damage to the environment could also result from Ocean
Rigs operations, particularly through spillage of fuel,
lubricants or other chemicals and substances used in drilling
operations, leaks and blowouts or extensive uncontrolled fires.
Ocean Rig may also be subject to property, environmental and
other damage claims by oil and gas companies. Ocean Rigs
insurance policies and contractual indemnity rights with its
customers may not adequately cover losses, and Ocean Rig does
not have insurance coverage or rights to indemnity for all
risks. Consistent with standard industry practice, Ocean
Rigs clients generally assume, and indemnify Ocean Rig
against, well control and subsurface risks under dayrate
contracts. These are risks associated with the loss of control
of a well, such as blowout or cratering, the cost to regain
control of or re-drill a well and associated pollution. However,
there can be no assurance that these clients will be willing or
financially able to indemnify Ocean Rig against all these risks.
Ocean Rig has no insurance coverage for named storms in the Gulf
of Mexico and war risk worldwide. Furthermore, pollution and
environmental risks generally are not totally insurable.
34
Ocean
Rigs insurance coverage may not adequately protect it from
certain operational risks inherent in the drilling
industry.
Ocean Rigs insurance is intended to cover normal risks in
its current operations, including insurance against property
damage, occupational injury and illness, loss of hire, certain
war risk and third-party liability, including pollution
liability.
Insurance coverage may not, under certain circumstances, be
available, and if available, may not provide sufficient funds to
protect Ocean Rig from all losses and liabilities that could
result from its operations. Ocean Rig has also obtained loss of
hire insurance which becomes effective after 45 days of
downtime with coverage that extends for approximately one year,
except for its operations offshore Greenland under its contracts
with Cairn, where the loss of hire insurance becomes effective
after 60 days. Ocean Rig received insurance payments under
this policy when, in the first quarter of 2007, the Eirik
Raude experienced 62 days of downtime operating
offshore Newfoundland due to drilling equipment failure and hull
structure repair that were the result of design issues. The
principal risks which may not be insurable are various
environmental liabilities and liabilities resulting from
reservoir damage caused by Ocean Rigs gross negligence.
Moreover, Ocean Rigs insurance provides for premium
adjustments based on claims and is subject to deductibles and
aggregate recovery limits. In the case of pollution liabilities,
Ocean Rigs deductible is $10,000 per event and $250,000
for protection and indemnity claims brought before any
U.S. jurisdiction. Ocean Rigs aggregate recovery
limits are $625.0 million for oil pollution, or
$750.0 million for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the
Leiv Eiriksson under the contracts with Cairn, and
$500.0 million for all other claims under its protection
and indemnity insurance which is provided by mutual protection
and indemnity associations. Ocean Rigs deductible is
$1.5 million per hull and machinery insurance claim, except
for its operations offshore Greenland under its contracts with
Cairn, where the deductible is $3.0 million for the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and $4.5 million for the Leiv
Eiriksson. In addition, insurance policies covering physical
damage claims due to a named windstorm in the Gulf of Mexico
generally impose strict recovery limits, which may result in
losses on any damage to Ocean Rigs drilling units that may
be operated in that region in the future. Ocean Rigs
insurance coverage may not protect fully against losses
resulting from a required cessation of rig operations for
environmental or other reasons. Insurance may not be available
to Ocean Rig at all or on terms acceptable to Ocean Rig, Ocean
Rig may not maintain insurance or, if Ocean Rig is so insured,
its policy may not be adequate to cover its loss or liability in
all cases. The occurrence of a casualty, loss or liability
against which Ocean Rig may not be fully insured could
significantly reduce its revenues, make it financially
impossible for it to obtain a replacement rig or to repair a
damaged rig, cause it to pay fines or damages which are
generally not insurable and that may have priority over the
payment obligations under its indebtedness or otherwise impair
Ocean Rigs ability to meet its obligations under its
indebtedness and to operate profitably.
Governmental
laws and regulations, including environmental laws and
regulations, may add to Ocean Rigs costs or limit its
drilling activity.
Ocean Rigs business in the offshore drilling industry is
affected by laws and regulations relating to the energy industry
and the environment in the geographic areas where it operates.
The offshore drilling industry is dependent on demand for
services from the oil and gas exploration and production
industry, and, accordingly, Ocean Rig is directly affected by
the adoption of laws and regulations that, for economic,
environmental or other policy reasons, curtail exploration and
development drilling for oil and gas. Ocean Rig may be required
to make significant capital expenditures to comply with
governmental laws and regulations. It is also possible that
these laws and regulations may, in the future, add significantly
to Ocean Rigs operating costs or significantly limit
drilling activity. Ocean Rigs ability to compete in
international contract drilling markets may be limited by
foreign governmental regulations that favor or require the
awarding of contracts to local contractors or by regulations
requiring foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase
supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Governments in some
countries are increasingly active in regulating and controlling
the ownership of concessions, the exploration for oil and gas,
and other aspects of the oil and gas industries. Offshore
drilling in certain areas has been curtailed and, in certain
cases, prohibited because of concerns over protection of the
environment. Operations in less developed countries can be
subject to legal systems that are not as mature or predictable
as those in more developed countries, which can lead to greater
uncertainty in legal matters and proceedings.
35
To the extent new laws are enacted or other governmental actions
are taken that prohibit or restrict offshore drilling or impose
additional environmental protection requirements that result in
increased costs to the oil and gas industry, in general, or the
offshore drilling industry, in particular, Ocean Rigs
business or prospects could be materially adversely affected.
The operation of Ocean Rigs drilling units will require
certain governmental approvals, the number and prerequisites of
which cannot be determined until Ocean Rig identifies the
jurisdictions in which it will operate on securing contracts for
the drilling units. Depending on the jurisdiction, these
governmental approvals may involve public hearings and costly
undertakings on Ocean Rigs part. Ocean Rig may not obtain
such approvals or such approvals may not be obtained in a timely
manner. If Ocean Rig fails to timely secure the necessary
approvals or permits, its customers may have the right to
terminate or seek to renegotiate their drilling contracts to
Ocean Rigs detriment. The amendment or modification of
existing laws and regulations or the adoption of new laws and
regulations curtailing or further regulating exploratory or
development drilling and production of oil and gas could have a
material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs business, operating
results or financial condition. Future earnings may be
negatively affected by compliance with any such new legislation
or regulations.
Ocean
Rig is subject to complex laws and regulations, including
environmental laws and regulations, that can adversely affect
the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.
Ocean Rigs operations are subject to numerous laws and
regulations in the form of international conventions and
treaties, national, state and local laws and national and
international regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which
its vessels operate or are registered, which can significantly
affect the ownership and operation of its vessels. These
requirements include, but are not limited to, the International
Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969,
the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping
of Wastes and Other Matter of 1975, the International Convention
for the Prevention of Marine Pollution of 1973, the
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1974,
the International Convention on Load Lines of 1966, the
U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, the U.S. Clean
Air Act, U.S. Clean Water Act and the U.S. Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002. Compliance with such laws,
regulations and standards, where applicable, may require
installation of costly equipment or operational changes and may
affect the resale value or useful lives of Ocean Rigs
vessels. Ocean Rig may also incur additional costs in order to
comply with other existing and future regulatory obligations,
including, but not limited to, costs relating to air emissions,
including greenhouse gases, the management of ballast waters,
maintenance and inspection, development and implementation of
emergency procedures and insurance coverage or other financial
assurance of Ocean Rigs ability to address pollution
incidents. These costs could have a material adverse effect on
Ocean Rigs business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition. A failure to comply with applicable laws
and regulations may result in administrative and civil
penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination
of Ocean Rigs operations. Environmental laws often impose
strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of oil
and hazardous substances, which could subject Ocean Rig to
liability without regard to whether it was negligent or at
fault. Under OPA, for example, owners, operators and bareboat
charterers are jointly and severally strictly liable for the
discharge of oil in U.S. waters, including the 200-nautical
mile exclusive economic zone around the United States. An oil
spill could result in significant liability, including fines,
penalties and criminal liability and remediation costs for
natural resource damages under other international and
U.S. federal, state and local laws, as well as third-party
damages. Ocean Rig is required to satisfy insurance and
financial responsibility requirements for potential oil
(including marine fuel) spills and other pollution incidents and
its insurance may not be sufficient to cover all such risks. As
a result, claims against Ocean Rig could result in a material
adverse effect on its business, results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition.
Ocean Rigs drilling units are separately owned by its
subsidiaries and, under certain circumstances, a parent company
and all of the ship-owning affiliates in a group under common
control engaged in a joint venture could be held liable for
damages or debts owed by one of the affiliates, including
liabilities for oil spills under OPA or other environmental
laws. Therefore, it is possible that Ocean Rig could be subject
to liability upon a judgment against it or any one of its
subsidiaries.
Ocean Rig drilling units could cause the release of oil or
hazardous substances, especially as Ocean Rigs drilling
units age. Any releases may be large in quantity, above its
permitted limits or occur in protected or sensitive areas where
public interest groups or governmental authorities have special
interests. Any releases of oil or
36
hazardous substances could result in fines and other costs to
Ocean Rig, such as costs to upgrade its drilling rigs, clean up
the releases, and comply with more stringent requirements in its
discharge permits. Moreover, these releases may result in Ocean
Rigs customers or governmental authorities suspending or
terminating its operations in the affected area, which could
have a material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs business,
results of operation and financial condition.
If Ocean Rig is able to obtain from its customers some degree of
contractual indemnification against pollution and environmental
damages in its contracts, such indemnification may not be
enforceable in all instances or the customer may not be
financially able to comply with its indemnity obligations in all
cases. And, Ocean Rig may not be able to obtain such
indemnification agreements in the future.
Ocean Rigs insurance coverage may not be available in the
future or Ocean Rig may not obtain certain insurance coverage.
If it is available and Ocean Rig has the coverage, it may not be
adequate to cover its liabilities. Any of these scenarios could
have a material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs business,
operating results and financial condition.
Regulation
of greenhouse gases and climate change could have a negative
impact on Ocean Rigs business.
In 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, which establishes a binding set of
targets for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, became
binding on all those countries that had ratified it.
International discussions are currently underway to develop a
treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol after its expiration in
2012. Although the United States is not a party to the Kyoto
Protocol, it has taken a number of steps to limit emissions of
greenhouse gas emissions, including imposing reporting and
permitting requirements on certain categories of sources.
Because Ocean Rigs business depends on the level of
activity in the offshore oil and gas industry, existing or
future laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements
related to greenhouse gases and climate change, including
incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources,
could have a negative impact on Ocean Rigs business if
such laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements
reduce the worldwide demand for oil and gas. In addition, such
laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements could
result in increased compliance costs or additional operating
restrictions, which may have a negative impact on Ocean
Rigs business.
The
Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico may result in
more stringent laws and regulations governing deepwater
drilling, which could have a material adverse effect on Ocean
Rigs business, operating results or financial
condition.
On April 20, 2010, there was an explosion and a related
fire on the Deepwater Horizon, an ultra-deepwater
semi-submersible drilling unit that is not connected to Ocean
Rig, while it was servicing a well in the Gulf of Mexico. This
catastrophic event resulted in the death of 11 workers and the
total loss of that drilling unit, as well as the release of
large amounts of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, severely impacting
the environment and the regions key industries. This event
is being investigated by several federal agencies, including the
U.S. Department of Justice, and by the U.S. Congress
and is also the subject of numerous lawsuits. On May 30,
2010, the U.S. Department of the Interior issued a
six-month moratorium on all deepwater drilling in the outer
continental shelf regions of the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific
Ocean.
On October 12, 2010, the U.S. government lifted the
drilling moratorium, subject to compliance with enhanced safety
requirements, including those set forth in Notices to Lessees
2010-N05 and 2010-N06, both of which were implemented during the
drilling ban. Additionally, all drilling in the Gulf of Mexico
will be required to comply with the Interim Final Rule to
Enhance Safety Measures for Energy Development on the Outer
Continental Shelf (Drilling Safety Rule) and the Workplace
Safety Rule on Safety and Environmental Management Systems, both
of which were issued on September 30, 2010. On
January 11, 2011, the National Commission on the BP
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling released its
final report, with recommendations for new regulations.
Ocean Rig does not currently operate its drilling rigs in these
regions but may do so in the future. In any event, those
developments could have a substantial impact on the offshore oil
and gas industry worldwide. The ongoing
37
investigations and proceedings may result in significant changes
to existing laws and regulations and substantially stricter
governmental regulation of Ocean Rigs drilling units. For
example, Norways Petroleum Safety Authority is assessing
the results of the investigations into the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill and has issued a preliminary report of its recommendations
on June 9, 2011, and Oil & Gas UK has established
the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Advisory Group to review
industry practices in the UK. In addition, BP plc, the rig
operator of the Deepwater Horizon, has reached an agreement with
the U.S. government to establish a claims fund of
$20 billion, which far exceeds the $75 million strict
liability limit set forth under OPA. Amendments to existing laws
and regulations or the adoption of new laws and regulations
curtailing or further regulating exploratory or development
drilling and production of oil and gas, may be highly
restrictive and require costly compliance measures that could
have a material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs business,
operating results or financial condition. Ocean Rigs
future earnings may be negatively affected by compliance with
any such amended or new legislation or regulations.
Failure
to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could
result in fines, criminal penalties, drilling contract
terminations and an adverse effect on Ocean Rigs
business.
Ocean Rig currently operates, and historically has operated, its
drilling units outside of the United States in a number of
countries throughout the world, including some with developing
economies. Also, the existence of state or government-owned
shipbuilding enterprises puts Ocean Rig in contact with persons
who may be considered foreign officials under the
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. Ocean Rig is
committed to doing business in accordance with applicable
anti-corruption laws and has adopted a code of business conduct
and ethics which is consistent and in full compliance with the
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Ocean Rig is subject,
however, to the risk that it, its affiliated entities or its or
their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may
take actions determined to be in violation of such
anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. Any such violation could result in substantial
fines, sanctions, civil
and/or
criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain
jurisdictions, and might adversely affect Ocean Rigs
business, results of operations or financial condition. In
addition, actual or alleged violations could damage Ocean
Rigs reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore,
detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged
violations is expensive and can consume significant time and
attention of its senior management.
Acts
of terrorism and political and social unrest could affect the
markets for drilling services, which may have a material adverse
effect on Ocean Rigs results of operations.
Acts of terrorism and political and social unrest, brought about
by world political events or otherwise, have caused instability
in the worlds financial and insurance markets in the past
and may occur in the future. Such acts could be directed against
companies such as Ocean Rigs. Ocean Rigs drilling
operations could also be targeted by acts of piracy. In
addition, acts of terrorism and social unrest could lead to
increased volatility in prices for crude oil and natural gas and
could affect the markets for drilling services and result in
lower dayrates. Insurance premiums could increase and coverage
may be unavailable in the future. U.S. government
regulations may effectively preclude Ocean Rig from actively
engaging in business activities in certain countries. These
regulations could be amended to cover countries where Ocean Rig
currently operates or where it may wish to operate in the
future. Increased insurance costs or increased cost of
compliance with applicable regulations may have a material
adverse effect on Ocean Rigs results of operations.
Hurricanes
may impact Ocean Rigs ability to operate its drilling
units in the Gulf of Mexico or other U.S. coastal waters, which
could reduce Ocean Rigs revenues and
profitability.
Hurricanes Ivan, Katrina, Rita, Gustav and Ike caused damage to
a number of drilling units in the Gulf of Mexico. Drilling units
that were moved off their locations during the hurricanes
damaged platforms, pipelines, wellheads and other drilling
units. The Minerals Management Service of the
U.S. Department of the Interior, now known as the Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, or BOEMRE,
issued guidelines for tie-downs on drilling units and permanent
equipment and facilities attached to outer continental shelf
production platforms, and moored drilling rig fitness that apply
through the 2013 hurricane season. These guidelines effectively
impose new requirements on the offshore oil and natural gas
industry in an attempt to improve the stations that house the
moored units and increase the likelihood of survival of offshore
drilling units during a hurricane. The
38
guidelines also provide for enhanced information and data
requirements from oil and natural gas companies operating
properties in the Gulf of Mexico. BOEMRE may issue similar
guidelines for future hurricane seasons and may take other steps
that could increase the cost of operations or reduce the area of
operations for Ocean Rigs ultra-deepwater drilling units,
thus reducing their marketability. Implementation of new BOEMRE
guidelines or regulations that may apply to ultra-deepwater
drilling units may subject Ocean Rig to increased costs and
limit the operational capabilities of its drilling units. Ocean
Rigs drilling units do not currently operate in the Gulf
of Mexico or other U.S. Coastal waters but may do so in the
future.
Any
failure to comply with the complex laws and regulations
governing international trade could adversely affect Ocean
Rigs operations.
The shipment of goods, services and technology across
international borders subjects Ocean Rigs offshore
drilling segment to extensive trade laws and regulations. Import
activities are governed by unique customs laws and regulations
in each of the countries of operation. Moreover, many countries,
including the United States, control the export and re-export of
certain goods, services and technology and impose related export
recordkeeping and reporting obligations. Governments also may
impose economic sanctions against certain countries, persons and
other entities that may restrict or prohibit transactions
involving such countries, persons and entities.
The laws and regulations concerning import activity, export
recordkeeping and reporting, export control and economic
sanctions are complex and constantly changing. These laws and
regulations may be enacted, amended, enforced or interpreted in
a manner materially impacting Ocean Rigs operations.
Shipments can be delayed and denied export or entry for a
variety of reasons, some of which are outside Ocean Rigs
control and some of which may result from failure to comply with
existing legal and regulatory regimes. Shipping delays or
denials could cause unscheduled operational downtime. Any
failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory trading
obligations also could result in criminal and civil penalties
and sanctions, such as fines, imprisonment, debarment from
government contracts, seizure of shipments and loss of import
and export privileges.
New
technologies may cause Ocean Rigs current drilling methods
to become obsolete, resulting in an adverse effect on its
business.
The offshore contract drilling industry is subject to the
introduction of new drilling techniques and services using new
technologies, some of which may be subject to patent protection.
As competitors and others use or develop new technologies, Ocean
Rig may be placed at a competitive disadvantage and competitive
pressures may force it to implement new technologies at
substantial cost. In addition, competitors may have greater
financial, technical and personnel resources that allow them to
benefit from technological advantages and implement new
technologies before Ocean Rig can. Ocean Rig may not be able to
implement technologies on a timely basis or at a cost that is
acceptable to Ocean Rig.
Risk
Factors Relating to Ocean Rig
Ocean
Rig may be unable to comply with covenants in its credit
facilities or any future financial obligations that impose
operating and financial restrictions on it.
Ocean Rigs credit facilities impose, and future financial
obligations may impose, operating and financial restrictions on
it. These restrictions may prohibit or otherwise limit Ocean
Rigs ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
enter into other financing arrangements;
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
create or permit liens on its assets;
|
|
|
|
sell its drilling units or the shares of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
make investments;
|
|
|
|
change the general nature of its business;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends to its shareholders;
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
change the management
and/or
ownership of the drilling units;
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
compete effectively to the extent its competitors are subject to
less onerous restrictions.
|
In addition, certain of Ocean Rigs current loan agreements
and related guarantees contain restrictions requiring it to
maintain a minimum amount of total available cash ranging from
$5.0 million to $100.0 million and also impose maximum
capital expenditure restrictions, such that expenditures over
$30.0 million require consent of the lender. These
restrictions could limit Ocean Rigs ability to fund its
operations or capital needs, make acquisitions or pursue
available business opportunities. Furthermore, under the terms
of its $800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement,
which matures in 2016, Ocean Rig is not permitted to pay
dividends without the consent of a majority of the lenders.
Ocean Rigs credit facilities require (i) Ocean Rig to
maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy financial
covenants, including covenants related to the market value of
its drilling units and (ii) DryShips, because it is a
guarantor of certain of Ocean Rigs facilities, to comply
with financial covenants relating to liquidity, equity ratios,
interest coverage ratios and net worth. As of June 30,
2011, Ocean Rig was in compliance with all of these ratios and
covenants. Events beyond its control, including changes in the
economic and business conditions in the deepwater offshore
drilling market in which Ocean Rig operates, may affect its
ability to comply with these ratios and covenants. Ocean Rig
cannot assure you that it will continue to meet these ratios or
satisfy these covenants. A breach of any of the covenants in, or
its inability to maintain the required financial ratios under,
the credit facilities would prevent Ocean Rig from borrowing
additional amounts under the credit facilities and could result
in a default under the credit facilities. In addition, each of
Ocean Rigs loan agreements also contains a cross-default
provision which can be triggered by a default under one of its
other loan agreements. A violation of these covenants
constitutes an event of default under its credit facilities,
which, unless waived by Ocean Rigs lenders, would provide
its lenders with the right to accelerate the outstanding debt,
together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately
due and payable and proceed against the collateral securing that
debt, which could constitute all or substantially all of Ocean
Rigs assets. A default by DryShips under one of its loan
agreements would trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs
Deutsche Bank credit facilities and would provide its lenders
with the right to accelerate the outstanding debt under these
facilities. Further, if DryShips defaults under one of its loan
agreements, and the related debt is accelerated, this would
trigger a cross-default under its $1.04 billion credit
facility and its $800.0 million secured term loan agreement
and would provide its lenders with the right to accelerate the
outstanding debt under these facilities. Ocean Rigs
lenders interests are different from Ocean Rigs, and
Ocean Rig cannot guarantee that it will be able to obtain its
lenders waiver or consent with respect to any
noncompliance with the specified financial ratios and financial
covenants under its credit facilities or future financial
obligations. Any such non-compliance may prevent Ocean Rig from
taking business actions that are otherwise in its best interest.
Ocean
Rigs parent company, DryShips, has obtained waiver
agreements for violations of various covenants under certain of
its loan agreements. Due to the cross-default provisions in
Ocean Rig loan agreements that are triggered in the event of a
default by Ocean Rig under one of its other loan agreements or,
in certain cases, a default by DryShips under one of its loan
agreements, when those waivers expire, Ocean Rigs lenders
could accelerate its indebtedness if DryShips fails to
(i) successfully extend the existing waiver agreements or
(ii) comply with the applicable covenants in the original
loan agreements.
Ocean Rigs loan agreements, which are secured by mortgages
on its drilling units, require Ocean Rig to (i) comply with
specified financial ratios and (ii) satisfy certain
financial and other covenants. As of June 30, 2011, Ocean
Rig had (i) $597.1 million outstanding under its
$1.04 billion credit facility (Ocean Rig has repaid
approximately $57.1 million in the third quarter of 2011);
(ii) a total of $272.6 million outstanding under its
Deutsche Bank credit facilities; (iii) $800.0 million
outstanding under its $800 million Nordea senior secured
term loan agreement; and (iv) $500.0 million
outstanding under its $500 million of aggregate principal
amount of 9.5% senior unsecured notes due in 2016.
DryShips currently provides guarantees under Ocean Rigs
Deutsche Bank credit facilities and Ocean Rigs
$800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement, which
require DryShips to comply with certain financial covenants,
including covenants to maintain minimum liquidity, equity ratio,
interest coverage, net worth and debt
40
service coverage ratio. All of Ocean Rigs loan agreements
contain a cross-default provision that may be triggered by a
default under one of its other loan agreements. A cross-default
provision means that a default on one loan would result in a
default on all of Ocean Rigs other loans. A default by
DryShips under one of its loan agreements would trigger a
cross-default under Ocean Rigs Deutsche Bank credit
facilities and would provide its lenders with the right to
accelerate the outstanding debt under these facilities. Further,
if DryShips defaults under one of its loan agreements, and the
related debt is accelerated, this would trigger a cross-default
under Ocean Rigs $1.04 billion credit facility and
its $800.0 million secured term loan agreement and would
provide Ocean Rigs lenders with the right to accelerate
the outstanding debt under these facilities.
DryShips and its shipping subsidiaries have several secured term
loan agreements totaling $959.1 million of gross
indebtedness outstanding at June 30, 2011. Due to the
decline in vessel values in the drybulk shipping sector,
DryShips was in breach of certain of its financial covenants as
of December 31, 2008 and, as a result, obtained waiver
agreements from its lenders waiving the violations of such
covenants. Certain of these waiver agreements expire during 2011
and 2012, at which time the original covenants under the loan
agreements come back into effect. As of June 30, 2011,
DryShips had either regained compliance with the covenants under
its loan agreements or had the ability to remedy shortfalls in
collateral maintenance requirements within specified grace
periods.
If DryShips is not in compliance with all of the covenants under
its loan agreements, there can be no assurance that it will be
successful in obtaining additional waivers or amendments to the
credit facilities or that the lenders will extend their waivers
(which under each loan agreement requires the unanimous consent
of the applicable lenders) prior to their expiration. Absent a
waiver or amendment, a default by DryShips under one of its loan
agreements would trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs
Deutsche Bank credit facilities and would provide its lenders
with the right to accelerate the outstanding debt under these
facilities and if DryShips defaults under one of its loan
agreements, and the related debt is accelerated, this would
trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs $1.04 billion
credit facility and Ocean Rigs $800.0 million secured
term loan agreement and would provide its lenders with the right
to accelerate the outstanding debt under these facilities, even
if Ocean Rig were otherwise in compliance with its loan
agreements. Ocean Rigs management does not expect that
cash on hand and cash generated from operations will be
sufficient to repay those loans with cross-default provisions if
such debt is accelerated by the lenders. In such a scenario,
Ocean Rig would have to seek to access the capital markets to
fund the mandatory payments, although such financing may not be
available on attractive terms or at all. In addition, if Ocean
Rig otherwise fails to comply with the covenants applicable to
its operations in its secured loan agreements, its lenders could
accelerate its indebtedness and foreclose their liens on its
drilling units, which would impair its ability to continue its
operations.
Ocean
Rig will need to procure significant additional financing, which
may be difficult to obtain on acceptable terms, in order to
complete the construction of its seventh generation hulls and
any of the three additional newbuilding drillships for which
Ocean Rig may exercise its option.
In April 2011, Ocean Rig exercised two of its options for the
construction of two newbuild drillships by Samsung, which are
scheduled to be delivered in July 2013 and September 2013,
respectively, and in June 2011, Ocean Rig exercised a third
option with Samsung for the construction of a newbuild drillship
to be delivered in November 2013. The estimated total project
cost of its seventh generation hulls is $638.0 million per
drillship, which consists of $570.0 million of construction
costs, costs of approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to
the existing drillship specifications and construction-related
expenses of $30.0 million. Ocean Rig also completed the
issuance of $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016 in April 2011. Ocean
Rig intends to apply the net proceeds of the notes issuance to
partially finance the construction of its seventh generation
hulls. In order to complete the construction of its seventh
generation hulls, Ocean Rig will need to procure additional
financing and, if Ocean Rig fails to take delivery of one or
more of the seventh generation hulls for any reason, it will be
prevented from realizing potential revenues from the applicable
drillship and it could lose its deposit money, which amounted to
$726.7 million in the aggregate, as of September 30,
2011. Ocean Rig may also incur additional costs and liability to
the shipyards, which may pursue claims against Ocean Rig under
its newbuilding construction contract and retain and sell its
seventh generation hulls to third parties.
The remaining three optional newbuilding drillships have an
estimated total project cost of $638.0 million each,
excluding financing costs. The options may be exercised by Ocean
Rig at any time on or prior to January 31,
41
2012, with vessel deliveries ranging from the first to the
third quarter of 2014, depending on when the options are
exercised. To the extent Ocean Rig exercises any of the three
newbuilding options, which have an estimated aggregate cost of
$1.9 billion, Ocean Rig will incur additional payment
obligations for which Ocean Rig has not arranged financing. If,
on the other hand, Ocean Rig does not exercise any of the
remaining options, Ocean Rig will sacrifice the corresponding
deposits, for which it paid approximately $24.8 million in
the aggregate as of September 30, 2011.
Ocean
Rig may be unable to meet its capital expenditure
requirements.
As of September 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had substantial
purchase commitments mainly representing remaining yard
installments for the three newbuilding drillships. The total
estimated yard cost is $608.0 million for each of the three
newbuilding drillships, of which Ocean Rig paid an aggregate
amount of $632.4 million in the second quarter of 2011, not
including the $94.3 million it paid in slot reservation
fees relating to these drillships prior to the second quarter of
2011. The remaining amount is payable on delivery of each
drillship, which is scheduled to be in July 2013, September 2013
and November 2013, respectively, for which Ocean Rig has not
arranged financing.
Ocean Rig expects to finance the delivery payments due in 2013
for its seventh generation hulls with cash on hand, operating
cash flow and bank debt that Ocean Rig intends to arrange.
Should Ocean Rig exercise the remaining three newbuilding
drillship options under its contract with Samsung, Ocean Rig
would expect to incur additional capital commitments of at least
$701.8 million payable at the time of exercise, for which
Ocean Rig would be dependent upon obtaining additional
financing, which it has not yet arranged. Should such financing
not be available, this could severely impact Ocean Rigs
ability to satisfy its liquidity requirements, meet its
obligations and finance future obligations.
Ocean
Rig may be unable to secure ongoing drilling contracts,
including for its three uncontracted seventh generation hulls
under construction, due to strong competition, and the contracts
that Ocean Rig enters into may not provide sufficient cash flow
to meet its debt service obligations with respect to its
indebtedness.
Ocean Rig has not yet secured drilling contracts for its three
seventh generation hulls under construction, scheduled to be
delivered to Ocean Rig in July 2013, September 2013 and November
2013, respectively. The existing drilling contracts for Ocean
Rigs drilling units currently employed are scheduled to
expire from the fourth quarter of 2011 through the fourth
quarter of 2014. Ocean Rig cannot guarantee that Ocean Rig will
be able to obtain contracts for its three uncontracted
newbuilding drillships or, upon the expiration or termination of
the current contracts, for its drilling units currently employed
or that there will not be a gap in employment between current
contracts and subsequent contracts. In particular, if the price
of crude oil is low, or it is expected that the price of crude
oil will decrease in the future, at a time when Ocean Rig is
seeking to arrange employment contracts for its drilling units,
Ocean Rig may not be able to obtain employment contracts at
attractive rates or at all.
If the rates which Ocean Rig receives for the reemployment of
its current drilling units are reduced, Ocean Rig will recognize
less revenue from their operations. In addition, delays under
existing contracts could cause Ocean Rig to lose future
contracts if a drilling unit is not available to start work at
the agreed date. Ocean Rigs ability to meet its cash flow
obligations will depend on its ability to consistently secure
drilling contracts for its drilling units at sufficiently high
dayrates. Ocean Rig cannot predict the future level of demand
for its services or future conditions in the oil and gas
industry. If the oil and gas companies do not continue to
increase exploration, development and production expenditures,
Ocean Rig may have difficulty securing drilling contracts,
including for the three newbuilding drillships Ocean Rig has
agreed to acquire, or it may be forced to enter into contracts
at unattractive dayrates. Either of these events could impair
Ocean Rigs ability to generate sufficient cash flow to
make principal and interest payments under its indebtedness and
meet its capital expenditure and other obligations.
Ocean
Rig has a substantial amount of debt, and Ocean Rig may lose the
ability to obtain future financing and suffer competitive
disadvantages.
Ocean Rig had outstanding indebtedness of $2.2 billion as
of June 30, 2011. Ocean Rig expects to incur substantial
additional indebtedness in order to fund the remaining
$16.8 million of construction-related expenses
42
for the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia,
the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
the total estimated project costs of $1.9 billion for
its seventh generation hulls, of which $726.7 million
amounted to previously-funded construction installment payments
as of September 30, 2011, and any further growth of Ocean
Rigs fleet. This substantial level of debt and other
obligations could have significant adverse consequences on Ocean
Rigs business and future prospects, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig may not be able to obtain financing in the future for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt
service requirements or other purposes;
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig may not be able to use operating cash flow in other
areas of its business because Ocean Rig must dedicate a
substantial portion of these funds to service the debt;
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig could become more vulnerable to general adverse
economic and industry conditions, including increases in
interest rates, particularly given its substantial indebtedness,
some of which bears interest at variable rates;
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig may not be able to meet financial ratios included in
its loan agreements due to market conditions or other events
beyond its control, which could result in a default under these
agreements and trigger cross-default provisions in Ocean
Rigs other loan agreements and debt instruments;
|
|
|
|
less leveraged competitors could have a competitive advantage
because they have lower debt service requirements; and
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig may be less able to take advantage of significant
business opportunities and to react to changes in market or
industry conditions than its competitors.
|
Ocean Rigs ability to service its debt will depend upon,
among other things, its future financial and operating
performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic
conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other
factors, some of which are beyond Ocean Rigs control. If
Ocean Rigs operating income is not sufficient to service
its current or future indebtedness, Ocean Rig will be forced to
take actions such as reducing or delaying its business
activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures,
selling assets, restructuring or refinancing its debt or seeking
additional equity capital. Ocean Rig may not be able to affect
any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all. In
addition, a lack of liquidity in the debt and equity markets
could hinder Ocean Rigs ability to refinance its debt or
obtain additional financing on favorable terms in the future.
Ocean
Rig may be unable to pay dividends.
As a result of various covenant restrictions imposed by its
lenders, Ocean Rig may be unable to pay dividends to its
shareholders. Under the terms of Ocean Rigs
$800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement, which
matures in 2016, Ocean Rig is not permitted to pay dividends
without the consent of a majority of the lenders. In addition,
the payment of any future dividends will be subject at all times
to the discretion of Ocean Rigs board of directors. The
timing and amount of dividends will depend on Ocean Rigs
earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and
availability, fleet renewal and expansion, restrictions in its
loan agreements, the provisions of Marshall Islands law
affecting the payment of dividends and other factors. Marshall
Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other
than from surplus or while a company is insolvent or would be
rendered insolvent upon the payment of such dividends, or if
there is no surplus, dividends may be declared or paid out of
net profits for the fiscal year.
Construction
of drillships is subject to risks, including delays and cost
overruns, which could have an adverse impact on Ocean Rigs
available cash resources and results of
operations.
Ocean Rig has entered into contracts with Samsung for the
construction of three ultra-deepwater newbuilding drillships,
which Ocean Rig expects to take delivery of in July 2013,
September 2013 and November 2013, respectively.
From time to time in the future, Ocean Rig may undertake new
construction projects and conversion projects. In addition,
Ocean Rig makes significant upgrade, refurbishment, conversion
and repair expenditures for its fleet from time to time,
particularly as its drilling units become older. Some of these
expenditures are unplanned. These
43
projects together with Ocean Rigs existing construction
projects and other efforts of this type are subject to risks of
cost overruns or delays inherent in any large construction
project as a result of numerous factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
shipyard unavailability;
|
|
|
|
shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor;
|
|
|
|
unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and
equipment;
|
|
|
|
local customs strikes or related work slowdowns that could delay
importation of equipment or materials;
|
|
|
|
engineering problems, including those relating to the
commissioning of newly designed equipment;
|
|
|
|
latent damages or deterioration to the hull, equipment and
machinery in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions;
|
|
|
|
work stoppages;
|
|
|
|
client acceptance delays;
|
|
|
|
weather interference or storm damage;
|
|
|
|
disputes with shipyards and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
shipyard failures and difficulties;
|
|
|
|
failure or delay of third-party equipment vendors or service
providers;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated cost increases; and
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining necessary permits or approvals or in
meeting permit or approval conditions.
|
These factors may contribute to cost variations and delays in
the delivery of Ocean Rigs ultra-deepwater newbuilding
drillships. Delays in the delivery of these newbuilding
drillships or the inability to complete construction in
accordance with their design specifications may, in some
circumstances, result in a delay in contract commencement,
resulting in a loss of revenue to Ocean Rig, and may also cause
customers to renegotiate, terminate or shorten the term of a
drilling contract for the drillship pursuant to applicable late
delivery clauses. In the event of termination of one of these
contracts, Ocean Rig may not be able to secure a replacement
contract on as favorable terms. Additionally, capital
expenditures for drillship upgrades, refurbishment and
construction projects could materially exceed Ocean Rigs
planned capital expenditures. Moreover, Ocean Rigs
drillships that may undergo upgrade, refurbishment and repair
may not earn a dayrate during the periods they are out of
service. In addition, in the event of a shipyard failure or
other difficulty, Ocean Rig may be unable to enforce certain
provisions under its newbuilding contracts such as its refund
guarantee, to recover amounts paid as installments under such
contracts. The occurrence of any of these events may have a
material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs results of
operations, financial condition or cash flows.
As its
current operating fleet is comprised of two ultra-deepwater
drilling rigs and four drillships, Ocean Rig relies heavily on a
small number of customers and the loss of a significant customer
could have a material adverse impact on Ocean Rigs
financial results.
Ocean Rig has three customers for its current operating fleet of
two ultra-deepwater drilling rigs and four drillships and it is
subject to the usual risks associated with having a limited
number of customers for its services. If these customers
terminate, suspend or seek to renegotiate the contracts for
these drilling units, as they are entitled to do under various
circumstances, or cease doing business Ocean Rigs results
of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Although Ocean Rig expects that a limited number of customers
will continue to generate a substantial portion of its revenues,
Ocean Rig will have to expand its pool of customers as it takes
delivery of its three newbuilding drillships and further grow
its business.
44
Currently,
Ocean Rigs revenues depend on two ultra-deepwater drilling
rigs and four drillships, which are designed to operate in harsh
environments. The damage or loss of either of these drilling
rigs could have a material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs
results of operations and financial condition.
Ocean Rigs revenues are dependent on the drilling rig
Eirik Raude, which is currently operating offshore of
Ghana, the drilling rig Leiv Eiriksson and the drillship
Ocean Rig Corcovado, which are currently operating
offshore of Greenland since May 2011, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, which commenced contracts to drill five exploration
wells with Vanco off the coast of Ghana and Cote dIvoire
directly upon its delivery on March 31, 2011, the Ocean
Rig Poseidon, which commenced a contract for drilling
operations in Tanzania and West Africa in July 2011, and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos, which is currently mobilizing for the
Petrobras Brazil contract scheduled to commence in the fourth
quarter of 2011. Ocean Rigs drilling units may be exposed
to risks inherent in deepwater drilling and operating in harsh
environments that may cause damage or loss. The drilling of oil
and gas wells, particularly exploratory wells where little is
known of the subsurface formations involves risks, such as
extreme pressure and temperature, blowouts, reservoir damage,
loss of production, loss of well control, lost or stuck drill
strings, equipment defects, punch throughs, craterings, fires,
explosions, pollution and natural disasters such as hurricanes
and tropical storms. In addition, offshore drilling operations
are subject to perils peculiar to marine operations, either
while
on-site or
during mobilization, including capsizing, sinking, grounding,
collision, marine life infestations, and loss or damage from
severe weather. The replacement or repair of a rig or drillship
could take a significant amount of time, and Ocean Rig may not
have any right to compensation for lost revenues during that
time. As long as Ocean Rig has only six drilling units in
operation, loss of or serious damage to one of the drilling
units could materially reduce its revenues in its offshore
drilling segment for the time that a rig or drillship is out of
operation. In view of the sophisticated design of the drilling
units, Ocean Rig may be unable to obtain a replacement unit that
could perform under the conditions that its drilling units are
expected to operate, which could have a material adverse effect
on Ocean Rigs results of operations and financial
condition.
Ocean
Rig is subject to certain risks with respect to its
counterparties on drilling contracts, and failure of these
counterparties to meet their obligations could cause Ocean Rig
to suffer losses or otherwise adversely affect its
business.
Ocean Rig enters into drilling services contracts with its
customers, newbuilding contracts with shipyards, interest rate
swap agreements and forward exchange contracts, and has employed
and may employ its drilling rigs and newbuild drillships on
fixed-term and well contracts. Ocean Rigs drilling
contracts, newbuilding contracts, and hedging agreements subject
Ocean Rig to counterparty risks. The ability of each of Ocean
Rigs counterparties to perform its obligations under a
contract with it will depend on a number of factors that are
beyond Ocean Rigs control and may include, among other
things, general economic conditions, the condition of the
offshore contract drilling industry, the overall financial
condition of the counterparty, the dayrates received for
specific types of drilling rigs and drillships and various
expenses. In addition, in depressed market conditions, Ocean
Rigs customers may no longer need a drilling unit that is
currently under contract or may be able to obtain a comparable
drilling unit at a lower dayrate. As a result, customers may
seek to renegotiate the terms of their existing drilling
contracts or avoid their obligations under those contracts.
Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under an
agreement with Ocean Rig, Ocean Rig could sustain significant
losses which could have a material adverse effect on its
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
If
Ocean Rigs drilling units fail to maintain their class
certification or fail any annual survey or special survey, that
drilling unit would be unable to operate, thereby reducing Ocean
Rigs revenues and profitability and violating certain
covenants under its credit facilities.
Every drilling unit must be classed by a
classification society. The classification society certifies
that the drilling unit is in-class, signifying that
such drilling unit has been built and maintained in accordance
with the rules of the classification society and complies with
applicable rules and regulations of the drilling units
country of registry and the international conventions of which
that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are
required by international conventions and corresponding laws and
ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will
undertake them on application or by official order, acting on
behalf of the authorities concerned. All four of Ocean
Rigs drilling rigs are certified as being in
class by Det Norske Veritas. Both of Ocean Rigs
operating drillships
45
are certified as being in class by American Bureau
of Shipping. The Leiv Eiriksson was credited with
completing its last Special Periodical Survey in April 2011 and
the Eirik Raude completed the same in 2007. The Eirik
Raude is due for its next Special Periodical Survey in the
third quarter 2012, while Ocean Rigs four drillships are
due for their first Special Periodical Survey in 2016. Ocean
Rigs seventh generation hulls are due for their first
Special Periodical Survey in 2018. If any drilling unit does not
maintain its class
and/or fails
any annual survey or special survey, the drilling unit will be
unable to carry on operations and will be unemployable and
uninsurable which could cause Ocean Rig to be in violation of
certain covenants in its credit facilities. Any such inability
to carry on operations or be employed, or any such violation of
covenants, could have a material adverse impact on Ocean
Rigs financial condition and results of operations. That
status could cause Ocean Rig to be in violation of certain
covenants in its credit facilities.
Ocean
Rigs drilling rigs and its drillships following their
delivery to Ocean Rig may suffer damage and it may face
unexpected yard costs, which could adversely affect Ocean
Rigs cash flow and financial condition.
If Ocean Rigs drilling rigs and Ocean Rigs
drillships following their delivery to Ocean Rig suffer damage,
they may need to be repaired at a yard. The costs of yard
repairs are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of
earnings while Ocean Rigs drilling rigs and drillships are
being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of
these repairs, would decrease its earnings. Ocean Rig may not
have insurance that is sufficient to cover all or any of these
costs or losses and may have to pay dry docking costs not
covered by its insurance.
Ocean
Rig may not be able to maintain or replace its drilling units as
they age.
The capital associated with the repair and maintenance of Ocean
Rigs fleet increases with age. Ocean Rig may not be able
to maintain its existing drilling units to compete effectively
in the market, and Ocean Rigs financial resources may not
be sufficient to enable it to make expenditures necessary for
these purposes or to acquire or build replacement drilling units.
Ocean
Rig may have difficulty managing its planned growth
properly.
Ocean Rig intends to continue to grow its fleet and Ocean Rig
may exercise one or more of its purchase options to purchase up
to an additional three newbuilding drillships. Ocean Rigs
future growth will primarily depend on its ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
locate and acquire suitable drillships;
|
|
|
|
identify and consummate acquisitions or joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
enhance its customer base;
|
|
|
|
manage its expansion; and
|
|
|
|
obtain required financing on acceptable terms.
|
Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks,
such as undisclosed liabilities and obligations, the possibility
that indemnification agreements will be unenforceable or
insufficient to cover potential losses and difficulties
associated with imposing common standards, controls, procedures
and policies, obtaining additional qualified personnel, managing
relationships with customers and integrating newly acquired
assets and operations into existing infrastructure. Ocean Rig
may experience operational challenges as it begins operating its
new drillships which may result in low earnings efficiency
and/or
reduced dayrates compared to maximum dayrates. Ocean Rig may be
unable to successfully execute its growth plans or Ocean Rig may
incur significant expenses and losses in connection with its
future growth which would have an adverse impact on its
financial condition and results of operations.
46
The
market value of Ocean Rigs current drilling units and
drilling units Ocean Rig may acquire in the future may decrease,
which could cause Ocean Rig to incur losses if it decides to
sell them following a decline in their values or accounting
charges that may affect Ocean Rigs ability to comply with
its loan agreement covenants.
If the offshore contract drilling industry suffers adverse
developments in the future, the fair market value of Ocean
Rigs drilling units may decline. The fair market value of
the drilling units Ocean Rig currently owns or may acquire in
the future may increase or decrease depending on a number of
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing level of drilling services contract dayrates;
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions affecting the offshore
contract drilling industry, including competition from other
offshore contract drilling companies;
|
|
|
|
types, sizes and ages of drilling units;
|
|
|
|
supply and demand for drilling units;
|
|
|
|
costs of newbuildings;
|
|
|
|
governmental or other regulations; and
|
|
|
|
technological advances.
|
In the future, if the market values of the Ocean Rig drilling
units deteriorate significantly, Ocean Rig may be required to
record an impairment charge in its financial statements, which
could adversely affect Ocean Rigs results of operations.
If Ocean Rig sells any drilling unit when drilling unit prices
have fallen and before Ocean Rig has recorded an impairment
adjustment to its financial statements, the sale may be at less
than the drilling units carrying amount on Ocean
Rigs financial statements, resulting in a loss.
Additionally, any such deterioration in the market values of
Ocean Rigs drilling units could trigger a breach of
certain financial covenants under its credit facilities and its
lenders may accelerate loan repayments. Such charge, loss or
repayment could materially and adversely affect Ocean Rigs
business prospects, financial condition, liquidity, and results
of operations.
Because
Ocean Rig generates all of its revenues in U.S. Dollars, but
incurs a significant portion of its employee salary and
administrative and other expenses in other currencies, exchange
rate fluctuations could have an adverse impact on its results of
operations.
Ocean Rigs principal currency for its operations and
financing is the U.S. Dollar. The dayrates for the drilling
rigs, its principal source of revenues, are quoted and received
in U.S. Dollars. The principal currency for operating
expenses is also the U.S. Dollar; however, a significant
portion of employee salaries and administration expenses, as
well as parts of the consumables and repair and maintenance
expenses for the drilling rigs, may be paid in Norwegian Kroner
(NOK), Great British Pound (GBP), Canadian dollar (CAD), Euro
(EUR) or other currencies depending in part on the location of
its drilling operations. This could lead to fluctuations in net
income due to changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar
relative to the other currencies. Expenses incurred in foreign
currencies against which the U.S. Dollar falls in value can
increase, resulting in higher U.S. Dollar denominated
expenses. Ocean Rig employs derivative instruments in order to
economically hedge its currency exposure; however, Ocean Rig may
not be successful in hedging its currency exposure and its
U.S. Dollar denominated results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected upon exchange rate
fluctuations determined by events outside of Ocean Rigs
control.
Ocean
Rig is dependent upon key management personnel.
Ocean Rigs operations depend to a significant extent upon
the abilities and efforts of its key management personnel. The
loss of Ocean Rigs key management personnels service
to Ocean Rig could adversely affect its efforts to obtain
employment for Ocean Rigs drillships and discussions with
its lenders and, therefore, could adversely affect its business
prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Ocean
Rig does not currently, nor does it intend to, maintain
key man life insurance on any of its personnel.
47
Failure
to attract or retain key personnel, labor disruptions or an
increase in labor costs could adversely affect Ocean Rigs
operations.
Ocean Rig requires highly skilled personnel to operate and
provide technical services and support for its business in the
offshore drilling sector worldwide. As of September 30,
2011, Ocean Rig employed 1,093 employees, the majority of
whom are full-time crew employed on its drilling units. Ocean
Rig will need to recruit additional qualified personnel as Ocean
Rig takes delivery of its newbuilding drillships. Competition
for the labor required for drilling operations has intensified
as the number of rigs activated, added to worldwide fleets or
under construction has increased, leading to shortages of
qualified personnel in the industry and creating upward pressure
on wages and higher turnover. If turnover increases, Ocean Rig
could see a reduction in the experience level of its personnel,
which could lead to higher downtime, more operating incidents
and personal injury and other claims, which in turn could
decrease revenues and increase costs. In response to these labor
market conditions, Ocean Rig is increasing efforts in its
recruitment, training, development and retention programs as
required to meet its anticipated personnel needs. If these labor
trends continue, Ocean Rig may experience further increases in
costs or limits on its offshore drilling operations.
Currently, none of Ocean Rigs employees are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. In the future, some of Ocean
Rigs employees or contracted labor may be covered by
collective bargaining agreements in certain jurisdictions such
as Brazil, Nigeria, Norway and the U.K. As part of the legal
obligations in some of these agreements, Ocean Rig may be
required to contribute certain amounts to retirement funds and
pension plans and have restricted ability to dismiss employees.
In addition, many of these represented individuals could be
working under agreements that are subject to salary negotiation.
These negotiations could result in higher personnel costs, other
increased costs or increased operating restrictions that could
adversely affect Ocean Rigs financial performance. Labor
disruptions could hinder Ocean Rigs operations from being
carried out normally and if not resolved in a timely
cost-effective manner, could have a material impact its
business. If Ocean Rig chooses to cease operations in one of
those countries or if market conditions reduce the demand for
Ocean Rigs drilling services in such a country, Ocean Rig
would incur costs, which may be material, associated with
workforce reductions.
Ocean
Rigs operating and maintenance costs with respect to its
offshore drilling rigs will not necessarily fluctuate in
proportion to changes in operating revenues, which may have a
material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Operating revenues may fluctuate as a function of changes in
dayrates. However, costs for operating a rig are generally fixed
regardless of the dayrate being earned. Therefore, Ocean
Rigs operating and maintenance costs with respect to its
offshore drilling rigs will not necessarily fluctuate in
proportion to changes in operating revenues. In addition, should
Ocean Rigs drilling units incur idle time between
contracts, Ocean Rig typically will not de-man those drilling
units but rather use the crew to prepare the rig for its next
contract. During times of reduced activity, reductions in costs
may not be immediate, as portions of the crew may be required to
prepare rigs for stacking, after which time the crew members are
assigned to active rigs or dismissed. In addition, as Ocean
Rigs drilling units are mobilized from one geographic
location to another, labor and other operating and maintenance
costs can vary significantly. In general, labor costs increase
primarily due to higher salary levels and inflation. Equipment
maintenance expenses fluctuate depending upon the type of
activity the unit is performing and the age and condition of the
equipment. Contract preparation expenses vary based on the scope
and length of contract preparation required and the duration of
the firm contractual period over which such expenditures are
incurred. If Ocean Rig experiences increased operating costs
without a corresponding increase in earnings, this may have a
material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In the
event Samsung does not perform under its agreements with Ocean
Rig and Ocean Rig is unable to enforce certain refund
guarantees, Ocean Rig may lose all or part of its investment,
which would have a material adverse effect on Ocean Rigs
results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
Ocean Rig took delivery of its newbuilding drillships, the
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos, on
January 3, 2011, March 30, 2011, July 28, 2011
and September 30, 2011, respectively, from Samsung, which
is located in South Korea.
48
Ocean Rig paid $632.4 million in the second quarter of 2011
in connection with its exercise of three of the drillship
newbuilding options under Ocean Rigs contract with Samsung
and, as a result, has entered into shipbuilding contracts for
three seventh generation, advanced capability ultra-deepwater
drillships, scheduled to be delivered in July 2013, September
2013 and November 2013, respectively, for a total estimated
project cost, excluding financing costs, of $638.0 million
per drillship. In addition, Ocean Rig has additional options
under its contract with Samsung to construct up to three
additional seventh generation, ultra-deepwater drillships, with
an estimated total project cost, excluding financing costs, of
$638.0 million per drillship. These options may be
exercised at any time by Ocean Rig on or prior to
January 31, 2012, with vessel deliveries ranging between
the first and third quarter of 2014, depending on when the
options are exercised. DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, paid a non-refundable deposit of $99.2 million in
the aggregate to secure this contract. Ocean Rig paid
$99.0 million to DryShips when the contract was novated to
Ocean Rig. In addition, Ocean Rig paid deposits totaling
$20.0 million to Samsung in the first quarter of 2011 to
maintain favorable costs and yard slot timing under the option
contract.
In the event Samsung does not perform under its agreements with
Ocean Rig and Ocean Rig is unable to enforce certain refund
guarantees with third-party bankers due to an outbreak of war,
bankruptcy or otherwise, Ocean Rig may lose all or part of its
investment, which would have a material adverse effect on Ocean
Rigs results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
Military
action, other armed conflicts, or terrorist attacks have caused
significant increases in political and economic instability in
geographic regions where Ocean Rig operates and where the
newbuilding drillships are being constructed.
Military tension involving North and South Korea, the Middle
East, Africa and other attacks, threats of attacks, terrorism
and unrest, have caused instability or uncertainty in the
worlds financial and commercial markets and have
significantly increased political and economic instability in
some of the geographic areas where Ocean Rig (i) operates
and (ii) has contracted with Samsung to build its four
newbuilding drillships. Acts of terrorism and armed conflicts or
threats of armed conflicts in these locations could limit or
disrupt Ocean Rigs operations, including disruptions
resulting from the cancellation of contracts or the loss of
personnel or assets. In addition, any possible reprisals as a
consequence of ongoing military action in the Middle East, such
as acts of terrorism in the United States or elsewhere, could
materially and adversely affect Ocean Rig in ways it cannot
predict at this time.
The
derivative contracts Ocean Rig has entered into to hedge its
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates could result in
higher than market interest rates and charges against Ocean
Rigs income.
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig has entered into interest
rate swaps for the purpose of managing its exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates applicable to indebtedness under
its credit facilities, which was drawn at a floating rate based
on LIBOR. Ocean Rigs hedging strategies, however, may not
be effective and it may incur substantial losses if interest
rates move materially differently from Ocean Rigs
expectations. Ocean Rigs existing interest rate swaps do
not, and future derivative contracts may not, qualify for
treatment as hedges for accounting purposes. Ocean Rig
recognizes fluctuations in the fair value of these contracts in
its income statement. In addition, Ocean Rigs financial
condition could be materially adversely affected to the extent
it does not hedge its exposure to interest rate fluctuations
under its financing arrangements, under which loans have been
advanced at a floating rate based on LIBOR and for which it has
not entered into an interest rate swap or other hedging
arrangement. Any hedging activities Ocean Rig engages in may not
effectively manage its interest rate exposure or have the
desired impact on its financial conditions or results of
operations. At June 30, 2011, the fair value of Ocean
Rigs interest rate swaps was a liability of
$93.4 million.
A
change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their
interpretation, of any country in which Ocean Rig operates could
result in a higher tax rate on its worldwide earnings, which
could result in a significant negative impact on Ocean
Rigs earnings and cash flows from
operations.
Ocean Rig conducts its worldwide drilling operations through
various subsidiaries. Tax laws and regulations are highly
complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, Ocean Rig
is subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and
between countries in which it operates. Ocean Rigs income
tax expense is based upon its
49
interpretation of tax laws in effect in various countries at the
time that the expense was incurred. A change in these tax laws,
treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, or in
the valuation of Ocean Rigs deferred tax assets, could
result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective
tax rate on its worldwide earnings, and such change could be
significant to its financial results. If any tax authority
successfully challenges Ocean Rigs operational structure,
inter-company pricing policies or the taxable presence of its
operating subsidiaries in certain countries; or if the terms of
certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is
adverse to Ocean Rigs structure; or if it loses a material
tax dispute in any country, particularly in the U.S., Canada,
the U.K., Turkey, Angola, Cyprus, Korea, Ghana or Norway, Ocean
Rigs effective tax rate on its worldwide earnings could
increase substantially and Ocean Rigs earnings and cash
flows from these operations could be materially adversely
affected.
Ocean Rigs subsidiaries may be subject to taxation in the
jurisdictions in which its offshore drilling activities are
conducted. Such taxation would result in decreased earnings
available to its shareholders. In the fourth quarter of 2008,
Ocean Rig ASA initiated the process of transferring the domicile
of its Norwegian entities that owned, directly or indirectly,
the Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude to the
Republic of the Marshall Islands and to liquidate the four
companies in the Norwegian rig owning structure. The Leiv
Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude were transferred to
Marshall Islands corporations in December 2008. The present
status of the four companies of the former Norwegian rig owning
structure is that two of the companies were formally liquidated
during December 2010 and the two remaining companies were
formally liquidated during the second quarter of 2011.
OceanFreight shareholders are encouraged to consult their own
tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences of the
ownership of the Ocean Rig shares arising in its particular
situation under U.S. federal, state, local or foreign law.
United
States tax authorities may treat Ocean Rig as a passive
foreign investment company for United States federal
income tax purposes, which may reduce Ocean Rigs ability
to raise additional capital through the equity
markets.
A foreign corporation will be treated as a passive foreign
investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income
tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income
for any taxable year consists of certain types of passive
income or (2) at least 50% of the average value of
the corporations assets produce or are held for the
production of those types of passive income. For
purposes of these tests, passive income includes
dividends, interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of
investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and
royalties which are received from unrelated parties in
connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For
purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of
services does not constitute passive income.
U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a
disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect
to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they
receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the
sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.
Ocean Rig does not believe that it is currently a PFIC, although
certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries may be or have been
classified as PFICs at any time through the conclusion of the
2008 taxable year. Based on Ocean Rigs current operations
and future projections, it does not believe that it or any of
Ocean Rigs subsidiaries have been, are or will be a PFIC
with respect to any taxable year beginning with the 2009 taxable
year.
However, no assurance can be given that the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service, or IRS, or a court of law will accept Ocean
Rigs position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court
of law could determine that Ocean Rig or one of its subsidiaries
is a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance can be given that Ocean Rig or
one of its subsidiaries would not constitute a PFIC for any
future taxable year if there were to be changes in the nature
and extent of its operations.
If the IRS were to find that Ocean Rig is or has been a PFIC for
any taxable year, Ocean Rigs U.S. shareholders will
face adverse U.S. tax consequences. Under the PFIC rules,
unless those shareholders make an election available under the
Code (which election could itself have adverse consequences for
such shareholders, as discussed below under
Taxation Certain Material Tax
Consequences Material Tax Considerations with
Respect to the Ownership and Disposition of Ocean Rig Common
Stock), such shareholders would be liable to pay
U.S. federal income tax at the then prevailing income tax
rates on ordinary income plus interest upon excess distributions
and upon any gain from the disposition of the Ocean Rig shares,
as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized
ratably over the shareholders holding period of the Ocean
Rig shares. In the event Ocean Rigs U.S. shareholders
50
face adverse U.S. tax consequences as a result of investing
in shares of Ocean Rig common stock, this could adversely affect
Ocean Rigs ability to raise additional capital through the
equity markets. See Taxation Certain Material
Tax Consequences Material Tax Considerations with
Respect to the Ownership and Disposition of Ocean Rig Common
Stock for a more comprehensive discussion of the
U.S. federal income tax consequences to
U.S. shareholders if Ocean Rig was treated as a PFIC.
Ocean
Rig may be subject to litigation that, if not resolved in its
favor and not sufficiently insured against, could have a
material adverse effect on Ocean Rig.
Ocean Rig may be, from time to time, involved in various
litigation matters. These matters may include, among other
things, contract disputes, personal injury claims, environmental
claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims,
employment matters, governmental claims for taxes or duties, and
other litigation that arises in the ordinary course of Ocean
Rigs business. Ocean Rig cannot predict with certainty the
outcome or effect of any claim or other litigation matter, and
the ultimate outcome of any litigation or the potential costs to
resolve them may have a material adverse effect on it. Insurance
may not be applicable or sufficient in all cases, insurers may
not remain solvent and policies may not be located.
Ocean
Rig has restated its previously reported financial statements
for 2009. Investor confidence may be adversely impacted if Ocean
Rig is unable to remediate the material weakness for the
assessment under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
As an operating subsidiary of DryShips, Ocean Rig has
implemented procedures in order to meet the evaluation
requirements of
Rules 13a-15(c)
and 15d-15
(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the
Exchange Act, for the assessment under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Following the effectiveness on
August 26, 2011 of the registration statement on
Form F-4
that Ocean Rig filed in connection with the Exchange Offer,
Ocean Rig became a public company and Ocean Rig will be required
to include in its annual report on
Form 20-F
its managements report on, and assessment of, the
effectiveness of Ocean Rigs internal controls over
financial reporting. In addition, Ocean Rigs independent
registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to
and report on managements assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal controls over financial reporting. These
management assessment and auditor attestation requirements will
first apply to Ocean Rigs annual report on
Form 20-F
for the year ending December 31, 2012. Ocean Rig restated
its previously-reported consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2009 to reflect the correction
of errors due to a material weakness in its internal control
over financial reporting. For additional information see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Restatement of
previously-issued financial statements for 2009 and
Note 3 to Ocean Rigs consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus. If Ocean Rig fails to
remediate the material weakness and therefore its internal
controls over financial reporting remain ineffective, this could
result in an adverse perception of Ocean Rig in the financial
marketplace and cause Ocean Rig investors to lose confidence in
its reported results.
Risk
Factors Relating to Ocean Rigs Common Stock
The
market value for shares of Ocean Rig common stock may be highly
volatile and subject to wide fluctuations.
Ocean Rigs common stock currently trades on the Norwegian
OTC market. Ocean Rigs common stock commenced trading on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol
ORIG on October 6, 2011. Holders of Ocean Rig
common stock therefore have limited access to information about
prior market history on which to base their investment decision.
The market value for shares of Ocean Rig common stock may be
highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Some
of the factors that could negatively affect the share price of
Ocean Rig common stock include:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in Ocean Rigs operating
results;
|
|
|
|
changes in Ocean Rigs cash flow, EBITDA or earnings
estimates;
|
|
|
|
publication of research reports about Ocean Rig or the industry
in which Ocean Rig operates;
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
increases in market interest rates that may lead purchasers of
common stock to demand a higher expected yield which, if Ocean
Rig distributions are not expected to rise, will mean Ocean Rig
share price will fall;
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings and
enforcement and legal actions;
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
|
|
adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness Ocean Rig
incurs in the future;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of Ocean Rig key personnel;
|
|
|
|
actions by institutional shareholders;
|
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community; and
|
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions.
|
Future
sales of Ocean Rigs common stock could have an adverse
effect on Ocean Rigs share price.
In order to finance the currently contracted and future growth
of its fleet, Ocean Rig will have to incur substantial
additional indebtedness and possibly issue additional equity
securities. Additional common share issuances, directly or
indirectly through convertible or exchangeable securities,
options or warrants, will generally dilute the ownership
interests of Ocean Rigs existing common shareholders,
including their relative voting rights, and could require
substantially more cash to maintain the then existing level, if
any, of Ocean Rigs dividend payments to its common
shareholders, as to which no assurance can be given. Preferred
shares, if issued, will generally have a preference on dividend
payments, which could prohibit or otherwise reduce Ocean
Rigs ability to pay dividends to its common shareholders.
Ocean Rigs debt will be senior in all respects to its
shares of common stock, will generally include financial and
operating covenants with which Ocean Rig must comply and will
include acceleration provisions upon defaults thereunder,
including Ocean Rigs failure to make any debt service
payments, and possibly under other debt. Because Ocean
Rigs decision to issue equity securities or incur debt in
the future will depend on a variety of factors, including market
conditions and other matters that are beyond Ocean Rigs
control, Ocean Rig cannot predict or estimate the timing, amount
or form of its capital raising activities in the future. Such
activities could, however, cause the price of Ocean Rigs
shares of common stock to decline significantly.
As of September 30, 2011, DryShips owned
98,587,878 shares of Ocean Rig common stock. Following the
merger of DryShips and OceanFreight, DryShips is expected to
continue to own a majority of Ocean Rigs outstanding
shares of common stock. The shares of Ocean Rig common stock
held by DryShips are restricted securities within
the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act and may
not be transferred unless they have been registered under the
Securities Act or an exemption from registration is available.
Upon satisfaction of certain conditions, Rule 144 permits
the sale of certain amounts of restricted securities six months
following the date of acquisition of the restricted securities
from us. As shares of Ocean Rig common stock become eligible for
sale under Rule 144, the volume of sales of Ocean Rig
common stock on applicable securities markets may increase,
which could reduce the market value of shares of Ocean Rig
common stock.
At the closing of the purchase agreement, which occurred on
August 24, 2011, the transferee of the Sellers acquired
1,570,226 shares of Ocean Rig common stock. Pursuant to the
terms of the purchase agreement the shares acquired by such
transferee are subject to a six-month restriction on
post-acquisition transfer, or lock up. As shares of Ocean Rig
common stock become eligible for sale, the volume of sales of
Ocean Rig common stock on applicable securities markets may
increase, which could reduce the market value of Ocean Rig
common stock.
Ocean
Rig is incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands,
which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law, and
as a result, shareholders may have fewer rights and protections
under Marshall Islands law than under a typical jurisdiction in
the U.S.
Ocean Rigs corporate affairs are governed by its second
amended and restated articles of incorporation and second
amended and restated bylaws and by the MIBCA. The provisions of
the MIBCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a
number of states in the U.S. However, there have been few
judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands
interpreting the MIBCA. The rights and fiduciary
responsibilities of directors under the law of the
52
Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established
as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under
statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain
U.S. jurisdictions. Shareholder rights may differ as well.
While the MIBCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory
law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other
states with substantially similar legislative provisions, Ocean
Rig public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting
their interests in the face of actions by management, directors
or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a
corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction.
It may
not be possible for investors to enforce U.S. judgments against
Ocean Rig.
Ocean Rig and all of its subsidiaries are incorporated in
jurisdictions outside the U.S. and a substantial portion of
Ocean Rigs assets and those of its subsidiaries are
located outside the U.S. In addition, a majority of Ocean
Rigs directors and officers and the experts named in this
proxy statement / prospectus reside outside the
U.S. and a substantial portion of the assets of its
directors and officers and such experts are located outside the
U.S. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for
U.S. investors to serve process within the U.S. upon
Ocean Rig, its subsidiaries or its directors and officers and
such experts or to enforce a judgment against Ocean Rig for
civil liabilities in U.S. courts. In addition, you should
not assume that courts in the countries in which Ocean Rig or
its subsidiaries are incorporated or where Ocean Rigs
assets or the assets of its subsidiaries, directors or officers
and such experts are located (i) would enforce judgments of
U.S. courts obtained in actions against Ocean Rig or its
subsidiaries, directors or officers and such experts based upon
the civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal
and state securities laws or (ii) would enforce, in
original actions, liabilities against Ocean Rig or its
subsidiaries, directors or officers and such experts based on
those laws.
DryShips,
Ocean Rigs parent company, controls the outcome of matters
on which Ocean Rigs shareholders are entitled to
vote.
DryShips owns approximately 75% of Ocean Rigs outstanding
common shares as of the date of this proxy statement /
prospectus. Following the merger of DryShips and OceanFreight,
DryShips is expected to continue to own a majority of Ocean
Rigs outstanding shares of common stock. DryShips will
control the outcome of matters on which Ocean Rigs
shareholders are entitled to vote, including the election of
directors and other significant corporate actions.
DryShips interests may be different from the interests of
holders of Ocean Rig common stock and the commercial goals of
DryShips as a shareholder, and Ocean Rigs goals, may not
always be aligned. The substantial equity interests held by
DryShips may make it more difficult for Ocean Rig to maintain
its business independence from other companies owned by DryShips
and DryShips affiliates.
Ocean
Rig depends on a director who is associated with affiliated
companies which may create conflicts of interest.
Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Economou, is also the Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of DryShips, its parent company, and has
significant shareholdings in DryShips. Mr. Economou owes
fiduciary duties to DryShips and its shareholders and may have
conflicts of interest in matters involving or affecting Ocean
Rig and Ocean Rigs customers. In addition Mr. Economou may
have conflicts of interest when faced with decisions that could
have different implications for DryShips than they do for Ocean
Rig.
In addition, Cardiff provides services relating to Ocean
Rigs drilling units, under the Global Services Agreement.
70% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Cardiff is
owned by a foundation which is controlled by Mr. Economou.
The remaining 30% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
Cardiff is owned by a company controlled by the sister of
Mr. Economou, who is also a director of DryShips. Vivid
Finance Ltd., a company controlled by Mr. Economou, has
been engaged by DryShips to act as a consultant on financing
matters for DryShips and its subsidiaries, including Ocean Rig.
See Ocean Rig Related Party Transactions. If any of
these conflicts of interest are not resolved in Ocean Rigs
favor, the result could have a material adverse effect on Ocean
Rigs business.
53
Ocean
Rig expects to incur increased costs as a result of becoming a
public company.
On August 26, 2011, the SEC declared effective Ocean Rigs
registration statement on
Form F-4
relating to the Exchange Offer. From the date that the
registration statement has been declared effective, Ocean Rig
has been a public reporting company. As a public company, Ocean
Rig will incur significant legal, accounting, investor relations
and other expenses that Ocean Rig did not incur prior to such
date. In addition, Ocean Rig has become subject to the
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, SEC rules and
stock exchange requirements. Ocean Rig expects these rules and
regulations to increase its legal and financial compliance costs
and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
Ocean Rig estimates that it will have increased costs of
approximately $0.7 million per year as a public company.
Anti-takeover
provisions contained in Ocean Rigs organizational
documents could make it difficult for Ocean Rig shareholders to
replace or remove Ocean Rigs current board of directors or
have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger
or acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of
Ocean Rigs securities.
Several provisions of Ocean Rigs second amended and
restated articles of incorporation and second amended and
restated bylaws could make it difficult for Ocean Rigs
shareholders to change the composition of Ocean Rigs board
of directors in any one year, preventing them from changing the
composition of management. In addition, the same provisions may
discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that
shareholders may consider favorable.
These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorizing Ocean Rigs board of directors to issue
blank check preferred stock without shareholder
approval;
|
|
|
|
providing for a classified board of directors with staggered,
three-year terms;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
authorizing the removal of directors only for cause and only
upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Ocean Rigs common stock entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the persons who may call special meetings of
shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for
election to Ocean Rigs board of directors or for proposing
matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder
meetings.
|
In addition, Ocean Rig entered into an Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement that makes it more difficult for a
third party to acquire Ocean Rig without the support of Ocean
Rigs board of directors. Under the Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement, Ocean Rigs board of
directors has declared a dividend of one preferred share
purchase right, or a right, to purchase one one-thousandth of a
share of Ocean Rigs Series A Participating Preferred
Stock for each outstanding share of Ocean Rigs common
stock. Each right entitles the registered holder, upon the
occurrence of certain events, to purchase from Ocean Rig one
one-thousandth of a share of Series A Participating
Preferred Stock. The rights may have anti-takeover effects. The
rights will cause substantial dilution to any person or group
that attempts to acquire Ocean Rig without the approval of Ocean
Rigs board of directors. As a result, the overall effect
of the rights may be to render more difficult or discourage any
attempt to acquire Ocean Rig. Because Ocean Rigs board of
directors will be able to approve a redemption of the rights or
a permitted offer, the rights should not interfere with a merger
or other business combination approved by Ocean Rigs board
of directors.
Although the MIBCA does not contain specific provisions
regarding business combinations between corporations
organized under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands and
interested shareholders, Ocean Rigs second
amended and restated articles of incorporation include
provisions that prohibit Ocean Rig from
54
engaging in a business combination with an interested
shareholder for a period of three years after the date of the
transaction in which the person became an interested
shareholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
shareholder becoming an interested shareholder, the interested
shareholder owned at least 85% of Ocean Rigs voting stock
outstanding at the time the transaction commenced;
|
|
|
|
at or subsequent to the date of the transaction that resulted in
the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder, the business
combination is approved by Ocean Rigs board of directors
and authorized at an annual or special meeting of Ocean
Rigs shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding Ocean Rig voting stock that is not owned by
the interested shareholder; or
|
|
|
|
the shareholder became an interested shareholder prior to the
consummation of Ocean Rigs initial public offering under
the Securities Act.
|
For purposes of these provisions, a business
combination includes mergers, consolidations, exchanges,
asset sales, leases and other transactions resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested shareholder and an
interested shareholder is any person or entity that
beneficially owns 15% or more of Ocean Rigs outstanding
voting stock and any person or entity affiliated with or
controlling or controlled by that person or entity, other than
DryShips, provided, however, that the term interested
shareholder does not include any person whose ownership of
shares in excess of the 15% limitation is the result of action
taken solely by Ocean Rig; provided that such person shall be an
interested shareholder if thereafter such person acquires
additional shares of Ocean Rigs voting shares, except as a
result of further action by Ocean Rig not caused, directly or
indirectly, by such person. Further, the term business
combination, when used in reference to Ocean Rig and any
interested shareholder does not include any
transactions for which definitive agreements were entered into
prior to May 3, 2011, the date the second amended and
restated articles of incorporation were filed with the Republic
of the Marshall Islands.
55
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans,
objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and
underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other
than statements of historical or present facts or conditions.
This proxy statement / prospectus and any other
written or oral statements made by OceanFreight, Ocean Rig or on
behalf of OceanFreight or Ocean Rig may include forward-looking
statements which reflect OceanFreights or Ocean Rigs
current views and assumptions with respect to future events and
financial performance and are subject to risks and
uncertainties. The words believe,
anticipate, intend,
estimate, forecast, project,
plan, potential, may,
should, expect and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements in this document are based upon
various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon
further assumptions, including without limitation, Ocean
Rigs managements or OceanFreights
managements examination of historical operating trends,
data contained in OceanFreight or Ocean Rig records and other
data available from third parties. Although OceanFreight or
Ocean Rig, as applicable, believe that these assumptions were
reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently
subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are
difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond
OceanFreights or Ocean Rigs control, OceanFreight
and Ocean Rig cannot assure you that OceanFreight or Ocean Rig,
as applicable, will achieve or accomplish these expectations,
beliefs or projections. Without limiting the foregoing,
statements contained in the sections The
Transaction OceanFreights Reasons for the
Merger; Recommendation of the OceanFreight Special Committee and
Board of Directors and The Transaction
Opinion of OceanFreights Financial Advisor include
forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts but
instead represent only OceanFreights expectations,
estimates and projections regarding future events.
In addition to these important factors and matters discussed
elsewhere in this proxy statement / prospectus,
important factors that, in OceanFreights, and Ocean
Rigs view, could cause actual results to differ materially
from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include
factors related to:
|
|
|
|
|
the offshore drilling market, including supply and demand,
utilization rates, dayrates, customer drilling programs,
commodity prices, effects of new rigs on the market and effects
of declines in commodity prices and downturn in global economy
on market outlook for Ocean Rigs various geographical
operating sectors and classes of rigs;
|
|
|
|
hazards inherent in the drilling industry and marine operations
causing personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or
destruction of property and equipment, pollution or
environmental damage, claims by third parties or customers and
suspension of operations;
|
|
|
|
customer contracts, including contract backlog, contract
commencements, contract terminations, contract option exercises,
contract revenues, contract awards and rig mobilizations,
newbuildings, upgrades, shipyard and other capital projects,
including completion, delivery and commencement of operations
dates, expected downtime and lost revenue;
|
|
|
|
political and other uncertainties, including political unrest,
risks of terrorist acts, war and civil disturbances, piracy,
significant governmental influence over many aspects of local
economies, seizure, nationalization or expropriation of property
or equipment;
|
|
|
|
repudiation, nullification, modification or renegotiation of
contracts;
|
|
|
|
limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage, in
certain areas;
|
|
|
|
foreign and U.S. monetary policy and foreign currency
fluctuations and devaluations;
|
|
|
|
the inability to repatriate income or capital;
|
|
|
|
complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment
in remote locations;
|
|
|
|
import-export quotas, wage and price controls imposition of
trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign
bureaucratic actions;
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
changing taxation policies and other forms of government
regulation and economic conditions that are beyond Ocean
Rigs control;
|
|
|
|
the level of expected capital expenditures and the timing and
cost of completion of capital projects;
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rigs ability to successfully employ its drilling
units, procure or have access to financing, comply with loan
covenants, liquidity and adequacy of cash flow for Ocean
Rigs obligations;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting Ocean Rigs results of operations and
cash flow from operations, including revenues and expenses, uses
of excess cash, including debt retirement, timing and proceeds
of asset sales, tax matters, changes in tax laws, treaties and
regulations, tax assessments and liabilities for tax issues,
legal and regulatory matters, including results and effects of
legal proceedings, customs and environmental matters, insurance
matters, debt levels, including impacts of the financial and
credit crisis;
|
|
|
|
the effects of accounting changes and adoption of accounting
policies;
|
|
|
|
recruitment and retention of personnel; and
|
|
|
|
other important factors described in this proxy
statement / prospectus under Risk Factors.
|
OceanFreight and Ocean Rig caution readers of this proxy
statement / prospectus not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their
dates. Ocean Rig and OceanFreight undertake no obligation to
update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether
as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
57
THE
SPECIAL MEETING
This proxy statement / prospectus is being provided to
OceanFreight shareholders as part of a solicitation of proxies
by the OceanFreight board of directors for use at the
OceanFreight special meeting.
Date,
Time and Place
The special meeting will be held at OceanFreights offices
located at 80 Kifissias Avenue, GR 151 25, Amaroussion, Athens,
Greece on November 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. local time.
Purpose
of the Special Meeting
The purpose of the special meeting is to:
|
|
|
|
|
consider and vote upon the approval of the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of July 26, 2011, among DryShips, Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., and OceanFreight, as it may be amended or
supplemented from time to time, pursuant to which Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips, will
merge with and into OceanFreight, the separate corporate
existence of Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will cease and
OceanFreight will continue its corporate existence as the
surviving corporation in the merger; and
|
|
|
|
transact such other business as may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment thereof.
|
Record
Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of shares of OceanFreight common stock at
the close of business on the record date, October 7, 2011,
are entitled to notice of and to vote at the OceanFreight
special meeting. As of the record date, there were
5,946,180 shares of OceanFreight common stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at the OceanFreight special
meeting. Each holder of OceanFreight common stock is entitled to
one vote for each share of OceanFreight common stock owned as of
the record date.
Upon the request of any shareholder at the special meeting or
prior thereto, OceanFreight will provide at the special meeting
a list of registered shareholders as of the record date, and of
holders of bearer shares who as of the record date have
qualified for voting.
Recommendation
of the OceanFreight Special Committee
The OceanFreight Special Committee has:
|
|
|
|
|
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are
fair to and in the best interests of OceanFreight and
OceanFreights shareholders (other than DryShips, Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel
Investments Limited and Haywood Finance Limited);
|
|
|
|
unanimously approved, adopted and declared advisable the merger
agreement and purchase agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger;
|
|
|
|
unanimously recommended that the adoption of the merger
agreement be submitted to OceanFreights special meeting to
consummate the merger; and
|
|
|
|
unanimously adopted the recommendation for approval and adoption
of the merger agreement by the shareholders of OceanFreight.
|
Approval
and Recommendation of the OceanFreight Board of
Directors
The OceanFreight board of directors has:
|
|
|
|
|
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are
fair to and in the best interests of OceanFreight and
OceanFreights shareholders (other than DryShips, Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel
Investments Limited and Haywood Finance Limited);
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
unanimously approved, adopted and declared advisable the merger
agreement and purchase agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger;
|
|
|
|
unanimously directed that the adoption of the merger agreement
be submitted to OceanFreights special meeting to
consummate the merger; and
|
|
|
|
unanimously adopted the recommendation by the OceanFreight board
of directors for approval and adoption of the merger agreement
by the shareholders of OceanFreight.
|
Quorum
and Vote Required
One-third of the shares of OceanFreight common stock entitled to
vote at any meeting of shareholders must be present in person or
represented by proxy at the OceanFreight special meeting to
constitute a quorum. A quorum must be present before a vote can
be taken on the proposal to approve the merger agreement or any
other matter except adjournment of the meeting due to the
absence of a quorum.
The approval of the proposal to approve the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock entitled to
vote thereon.
Simultaneously with the execution of the merger agreement,
DryShips; Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel Investments Limited
and Haywood Finance Limited, entities controlled by
Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief Executive Officer of
OceanFreight; and OceanFreight entered into a purchase
agreement. Under the purchase agreement, DryShips acquired from
the entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis, on
August 24, 2011, all their OceanFreight shares,
representing a majority of the outstanding shares of
OceanFreight, for the same consideration per share that the
OceanFreight shareholders will receive in the merger. DryShips
has agreed to vote the OceanFreight shares it acquired
FOR the approval of the merger agreement.
Accordingly, approval of the merger agreement is assured.
If you do not vote, or you abstain from voting your shares
with respect to the proposal to approve the merger agreement, it
will have the same effect as a vote against the approval of the
merger agreement.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the
holders of OceanFreight common stock at the special meeting is
required to approve the proposal to adjourn or postpone the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to
solicit additional proxies. If you do not vote, or you abstain
from voting, your shares with respect to the proposal to approve
such adjournment or postponement, it will have no effect on such
proposal.
Broker non-votes are shares held by a broker or other nominee
that are represented at the meeting, but with respect to which
the broker or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner
of such shares to vote on the particular proposal and the broker
does not have discretionary voting power on the proposal. If an
OceanFreight shareholders broker holds such
shareholders OceanFreight common stock in street
name, the broker will vote such shareholders shares
only if the shareholder provides instructions on how to vote by
filling out the voter instruction form sent to the shareholder
by his or her broker with this proxy
statement / prospectus. Brokers and other nominees
will not have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement. A broker non-vote will have the same
effect as a vote against the adoption of the merger
agreement. Abstentions also will have the same effect as a vote
against the proposal to approve the plan of merger
contained in the merger agreement.
Voting;
Proxies; Revocation
Holders of OceanFreights common stock as of the record
date may submit a proxy or vote in person at the special meeting.
Voting
in Person
OceanFreight shareholders who plan to attend the special meeting
and wish to vote in person will be given a ballot at the special
meeting. Please note, however, that OceanFreight shareholders
who hold their shares in street name, and who wish
to vote in person at the special meeting, must bring to the
special meeting a proxy from the record holder of the shares
authorizing such OceanFreight shareholder to vote at the special
meeting.
59
Voting
by Proxy
The vote of each OceanFreight shareholder is very important.
Accordingly, OceanFreight shareholders who hold their shares as
a record holder should complete, sign and return the enclosed
proxy card whether or not they plan to attend the special
meeting in person. OceanFreight shareholders should submit their
proxy even if they plan to attend the special meeting.
OceanFreight shareholders can always change their vote prior to
the vote being taken at the special meeting. Voting instructions
are included on the enclosed proxy card. If an OceanFreight
shareholder properly gives his or her proxy, and submits it to
OceanFreight in time to vote, one of the individuals named as
such OceanFreight shareholders proxy will vote the shares
as such OceanFreight shareholder has directed. A proxy card is
enclosed for use by OceanFreight shareholders of record.
The method of voting by proxy differs for shares held as a
record holder and shares held in street name. If an
OceanFreight shareholder holds shares of OceanFreight common
stock as a record holder, he or she may submit a proxy by
completing, dating and signing the enclosed proxy card and
promptly returning it in the enclosed, pre-addressed,
postage-paid envelope or otherwise mailing it to OceanFreight.
If an OceanFreight shareholder holds shares of OceanFreight
common stock in street name, the OceanFreight
shareholder will receive instructions from his or her broker,
bank or other nominee that the OceanFreight shareholder must
follow in order to vote his or her shares. OceanFreight
shareholders who hold their shares in street name
should refer to the voting instructions from their broker, bank
or nominee that accompany this proxy
statement / prospectus.
All properly signed proxies that are received prior to the
special meeting and that are not revoked will be voted at the
special meeting according to the instructions indicated on the
proxies or, if no direction is indicated, they will be voted
FOR the proposal to approve and adopt the plan of
merger contained in the merger agreement and FOR the
proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting, if
necessary or appropriate.
Revocation
of Proxies
An OceanFreight shareholder may revoke his or her proxy, and
change his or her vote at any time before the proxy is voted at
the special meeting. If you are a holder of record, you can
change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the
special meeting by:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering a signed written notice of revocation to the
Secretary of OceanFreight at:
|
OceanFreight Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion, 15125
Athens, Greece
Attn.: Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
submitting another proxy bearing a later date (in any of the
permitted forms); or
|
|
|
|
attending and casting a ballot in person at the special meeting,
although your attendance alone will not revoke your proxy.
|
If you hold your shares in street name, contact your
broker, bank or other nominee regarding how to instruct your
broker, bank or other nominee to revoke your proxy and change
your vote and any deadlines for the receipt of these
instructions.
Delivery
of Proxy Materials
To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials
to OceanFreight shareholders, OceanFreight is relying upon SEC
rules that permit OceanFreight to deliver only one proxy
statement / prospectus to multiple shareholders who
share an address unless OceanFreight receives contrary
instructions from any shareholder at that address. If you share
an address with another shareholder and have received only one
proxy statement / prospectus,
60
you may call or write OceanFreight as specified below to request
a separate copy of this document and OceanFreight will promptly
send it to you at no cost to you:
OceanFreight Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion, 15125
Athens, Greece
+30-210-6140283
Solicitation
of Proxies
The enclosed proxy is being solicited by or on behalf of the
OceanFreight board of directors. In addition to solicitation of
proxies by mail, OceanFreight will request that banks, brokers
and other record holders send proxies and proxy materials to the
beneficial owners of OceanFreight common stock and secure their
voting instructions, if necessary. OceanFreight will reimburse
the record holders for their reasonable expenses in taking those
actions.
Proxies may be solicited by directors, officers and employees of
OceanFreight in person or by telephone or other means, for which
such persons will receive no special compensation.
Dissenters
Rights of Appraisal
Under the MIBCA, a shareholder of a corporation has the right to
vote against any plan of merger to which the corporation is a
party. If such shareholders vote against the plan of merger,
they may have the right to seek payment from their corporation
of the appraised fair value of their shares (instead of the
contractual merger consideration). However, the right of a
dissenting shareholder under the MIBCA to receive payment of the
appraised fair value of his shares is not available for
the shares of any class or series of stock, which shares or
depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed
to determine the shareholders entitled to receive notice of and
to vote at the meeting of the shareholders to act upon the
agreement of merger or consolidation, were either
(i) listed on a securities exchange or admitted for trading
on an interdealer quotation system or (ii) held of record
by more than 2,000 holders. It is the view of OceanFreight
that since shares of OceanFreight common stock are listed on the
NASDAQ Global Market, a dissenting holder of shares of
OceanFreight common stock has no right under the MIBCA to
receive payment for the appraised fair value of the shares.
61
THE
TRANSACTION
The following discussion contains material information about
the merger. The discussion is subject, and qualified in its
entirety by reference, to the merger agreement and the purchase
agreement included as Annex A and Annex B to this
proxy statement / prospectus, respectively. Ocean Rig
and OceanFreight urge you to read carefully this entire proxy
statement / prospectus, including the merger agreement
and the purchase agreement included as Annex A and
Annex B to this proxy statement / prospectus, for
a more complete understanding of the transaction.
General
Description of the Transaction
The boards of directors of DryShips and OceanFreight, the Audit
Committee of the board of directors of DryShips, and the
OceanFreight Special Committee have approved the merger
agreement and the purchase agreement.
The merger agreement provides that Pelican Stockholdings Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips formed for the purpose of
effecting the merger, will merge with and into OceanFreight.
Following the merger, OceanFreight will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of DryShips and will continue its corporate existence
under the laws of the Marshall Islands. Concurrently, the
separate corporate existence of Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will
terminate.
In the merger, each outstanding share of OceanFreight common
stock (other than shares owned by OceanFreight, DryShips,
Pelican Stockholdings Inc., or any of their respective direct or
indirect subsidiaries, which will be cancelled) will be
converted at the effective time of the merger into the right to
receive (i) $11.25 in cash and
(ii) 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock. Based
on the last traded price as of July 25, 2011 of NOK89.00
(approximately $16.44 based on an exchange ratio of
NOK5.41 / USD$1 as of July 25, 2011) for the
shares of Ocean Rig on the Norwegian OTC, the transaction
consideration reflects a total equity value for OceanFreight of
approximately $118 million and a total enterprise value of
approximately $239 million, including the assumption of
debt.
Under a purchase and sale agreement with entities controlled by
Mr. Kandylidis, DryShips acquired from the entities
controlled by Mr. Kandylidis all their OceanFreight shares,
representing a majority of the outstanding shares of
OceanFreight, for the same consideration per share that the
OceanFreight shareholders will receive in the merger. This
acquisition closed on August 24, 2011.
DryShips has committed to vote the OceanFreight shares it
acquired in favor of the merger, which requires approval by a
majority vote.
For additional and more detailed information regarding the legal
documents that govern the transaction, including information
about the conditions to the completion of the transaction and
the provisions for terminating or amending the merger agreement
and the purchase agreement, see The Merger Agreement
and The Purchase and Sale Agreement.
Background
of the Transaction
On May 23, 2011, Pankaj Khanna, the Chief Operating Officer
of DryShips, informed Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief Executive
Officer of OceanFreight, that DryShips was interested in
investigating possible strategic transactions between DryShips
and OceanFreight.
On May 27, 2011, OceanFreight held a board meeting during
which Mr. Kandylidis informed the OceanFreight board of
directors that he received an expression of interest from
DryShips and the OceanFreight board of directors constituted a
special committee comprised of its independent members,
Messrs. John Liveris, George Biniaris and Panagiotis
Korakas to evaluate, discuss and negotiate any proposal by
DryShips for a strategic transaction and to make a
recommendation to the OceanFreight board of directors at the
appropriate time. Mr. John Liveris was appointed chairman
of the OceanFreight Special Committee.
On June 1, 2011, Mr. Liveris sent a letter to
Mr. Khanna requesting that all future communications be
directed to him and that further clarification be provided on
the type and nature of the strategic alternatives
transaction that DryShips wished to pursue with OceanFreight.
Mr. Liveris further asked what type of information DryShips
wished
62
to receive in connection with any further discussions and
expressed the OceanFreight Special Committees preparedness
to engage appropriate advisors and sign a non-disclosure
agreement to facilitate an exchange of information and further
discussions.
On June 8, 2011, Mr. Khanna sent a letter to the
OceanFreight Special Committee outlining a proposed transaction.
Pursuant to the proposal, DryShips would acquire a majority
interest in OceanFreight held directly or indirectly by
Mr. Kandylidis, and DryShips, as the new controlling
shareholder of OceanFreight, would support its prospects by,
among other things, offering to replace the existing credit
facilities with new facilities or amend and guarantee the
existing credit facilities. According to Mr. Khanna,
DryShips guarantee would enable OceanFreight to borrow on
modified terms that would enhance OceanFreights financial
flexibility. Mr. Khanna stated that he believed that the
DryShips investment and sponsorship, along with the
flexibility created by the restructured credit facilities, would
be perceived positively by OceanFreight investors, and that
OceanFreight would have the opportunity to reintroduce itself to
the public markets with the benefit of a high-profile strategic
investor, solidified capital structure, and increased financial
flexibility. Mr. Khanna noted that, although OceanFreight
had improved its prospects over the last year by significantly
lowering its average fleet age, lowering its leverage profile
and expanding its charter coverage, it faced significant
challenges. At the same time, Mr. Khanna provided a high
priority due diligence list to the OceanFreight Special
Committee and asked that OceanFreight enter into a
non-disclosure
agreement with DryShips.
On June 15, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee
responded to Mr. Khannas letter acknowledging the
benefits of a potential transaction with DryShips but stated its
strong preference that all shareholders of OceanFreight
participate in the transaction and receive the same
consideration. The OceanFreight Special Committee requested that
DryShips consider acquiring all the shares of OceanFreight,
thereby potentially gaining full ownership of OceanFreight.
Mr. Liveris noted that the OceanFreight Special Committee
could not proceed with the execution of a non-disclosure
agreement until a revised offer was received.
On June 17, 2011, Mr. Khanna sent a response to the
OceanFreight Special Committee reiterating the rationale and
benefits of the proposed transaction and, in addition, offering
for DryShips to acquire, at a mutually acceptable price,
OceanFreights newbuild contracts for its five VLOCs, of
which two are unfinanced.
On June 21, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee
responded to Mr. Khanna reiterating its preference for a
transaction on equal terms for all OceanFreight shareholders
either in the form of an offer being made for all shares on
equal terms or in the form of an undertaking by
Mr. Kandylidis whereby he would commit to extend
DryShips offer for the shares held directly or indirectly
by Mr. Kandylidis on a pro-rata basis to the remaining
shareholders. The OceanFreight Special Committee informed
Mr. Khanna that it may consider other alternatives to
realize the value of OceanFreights stock for all
shareholders. The OceanFreight Special Committee however
indicated its willingness to sign a non-disclosure agreement and
exchange due diligence material with DryShips.
On June 28, 2011, Mr. Khanna informed the OceanFreight
Special Committee that DryShips was willing to proceed with a
transaction which would involve an acquisition of all of the
outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock in which all
shareholders would receive the same consideration per share, and
that DryShips was willing to acquire all of the outstanding
common stock of OceanFreight for $0.60 per share (or $12 per
share on a
1-for-20
reverse stock split adjustment) in an all cash transaction,
subject to satisfactory due diligence. A non-disclosure
agreement was executed on the same day and on June 29,
2011, a full due diligence request list was provided to the
OceanFreight Special Committee by DryShips.
On June 30, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee began
to provide due diligence material to DryShips.
On July 1, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee held a
meeting by telephone, attended by its financial advisor,
Fearnley, and its legal advisor, Seward & Kissel LLP,
to discuss various matters, including (i) informal
discussions between Mr. Liveris and Mr. Khanna of
DryShips concerning the terms of the indicative expression of
interest contained in DryShips June 28, 2011 letter
to the OceanFreight Special Committee, and (ii) the general
process, securities law and other considerations to be taken
into account in connection with the proposed transaction,
including Fearnleys views on possible alternatives to the
proposed transaction.
On July 4, 2011, Mr. Khanna requested that the
OceanFreight Special Committee make management available for a
due diligence call to review outstanding diligence items, which
occurred on July 13, 2011.
63
On July 5, 2011, OceanFreight announced a
1-for-20
reverse stock split.
On July 8, 2011, DryShips held a Board Meeting where the
OceanFreight transaction was discussed and the DryShips board of
directors authorized the Audit Committee to negotiate the
purchase of OceanFreight. The Audit Committee of independent
directors of DryShips chaired by Harry Kerames was authorized by
the board of directors of DryShips to formally review the terms
and conditions of any proposed transaction and make its
recommendation to the board of directors of DryShips at the
appropriate time.
On July 11, 2011, Mr. Khanna informed the OceanFreight
Special Committee that DryShips had reviewed the diligence
materials that had been made available to it and had revised its
proposal to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
OceanFreight. Mr. Khanna noted that DryShips proposed to
acquire (i) the approximately 50.5% ownership interest in
OceanFreight held directly or indirectly by Mr. Kandylidis
for $14 per share in cash and (ii) the remaining
OceanFreight shares for shares of Ocean Rig presently owned by
DryShips with an implied value of $16 per OceanFreight share.
Mr. Khanna noted that the transaction would provide
OceanFreight public shareholders with consideration reflecting a
148% premium to the then current trading price of OceanFreight
shares as well as the opportunity to benefit from the potential
upside in the Ocean Rig shares, and that DryShips believed that
the shares of Ocean Rig were undervalued due to their lack of a
public listing. Mr. Khanna offered to provide the
OceanFreight Special Committee with any required diligence
materials on Ocean Rig so that it could develop its own view on
the value of the Ocean Rig shares. Mr. Khanna further noted
that Ocean Rig was in the final stage of registering its shares
with the SEC, and that DryShips management expected the
Ocean Rig shares to begin trading on NASDAQ within the following
months. Mr. Khanna suggested that the transaction be
structured as a two-step transaction as follows:
(i) acquisition of the shares held directly or indirectly
by Mr. Kandylidis concurrently with the execution of a
merger agreement between DryShips and OceanFreight and
(ii) acquisition of the remaining OceanFreight shares after
SEC registration of the Ocean Rig shares. The acquisition of
these remaining OceanFreight shares would be completed either
via an exchange offer or a one-step merger.
On July 12, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee
informed DryShips that it could not recommend DryShips
offer and that, in light of the underlying values of
OceanFreight, the OceanFreight Special Committee deemed the
offer price as insufficient. The OceanFreight Special Committee
indicated that it believed an offer of at least $22.50 per share
was warranted. The OceanFreight Special Committee also noted
that it was not willing to present or recommend to the
OceanFreight shareholders an offer which would preclude possible
third-party offers. Therefore, Mr. Liveris suggested that
the shares held directly or indirectly by Mr. Kandylidis be
released to DryShips 60 days after the execution of the
merger agreement, during which period the OceanFreight Special
Committee should have the right to solicit and accept potential
higher offers by third parties.
On July 13, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee made
OceanFreight management available for a due diligence call to
review outstanding diligence items.
On July 14, 2011, Mr. Khanna informed the OceanFreight
Special Committee that DryShips had further revised its proposal
and was willing to proceed with a transaction in which DryShips
would acquire the shares held directly or indirectly by
Mr. Kandylidis for $16 per share in cash and all other
OceanFreight shares for shares of Ocean Rig in an offer which
DryShips believed reflected an implied value of $18 per
OceanFreight share.
On July 14, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee
reiterated the position set out in its
July 12th correspondence that the proposed offer did
not reflect the underlying value of OceanFreight and that the
offer did not address the OceanFreight Special Committees
desire for equal treatment of all of OceanFreights
shareholders. The OceanFreight Special Committee proposed that
50% of the consideration to all shareholders be paid in cash and
the remaining 50% in the form of Ocean Rig shares valued at
$17.50 per Ocean Rig share (the then trading level). The
OceanFreight Special Committee communicated its view that an
offer on this basis should be priced at $26 per OceanFreight
share and all shareholders should be paid at the same time. The
OceanFreight Special Committee indicated that it would want to
seek third-party offers for a period of three weeks.
On July 15, 2011, Mr. Khanna informed the OceanFreight
Special Committee that DryShips was willing to modify the
proposed terms of the acquisition so that all shareholders of
OceanFreight would receive the same cash and stock
consideration. DryShips also proposed that while OceanFreight
would not be permitted to solicit third-party acquisition
proposals, in the event that the OceanFreight Special Committee
were to receive an unsolicited
64
superior proposal before the closing of the Exchange Offer, the
OceanFreight Special Committee would be permitted to terminate
the merger agreement with DryShips to accept the superior
proposal after giving DryShips a customary opportunity to match
the superior proposal. DryShips stated that it would expect to
sign an agreement with Mr. Kandylidis in which he would
agree to support the transaction, and that the agreement would
terminate in the event the OceanFreight Special Committee
terminated the merger agreement to accept an unsolicited
superior proposal. In connection with the termination of the
merger agreement, OceanFreight would be required to pay DryShips
an agreed customary termination fee based on an enterprise value
of OceanFreight reflecting the value of DryShips offer.
Mr. Khanna noted that DryShips continued to review the
diligence materials and would revert to the OceanFreight Special
Committee in the following days to propose an aggregate
cash and share purchase price.
On July 15, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee
agreed, in light of the revised proposal from DryShips, to meet
in person with DryShips and its advisors in Athens the following
week to further discuss the transaction.
On July 19, 2011, the Audit Committee chairman of DryShips,
Mr. Kerames, along with Mr. Khanna and the DryShips
advisors, met with members of the OceanFreight Special Committee
and its advisors to discuss the potential transaction. At the
conclusion of the negotiations, the parties agreed in principle,
subject to negotiation of definitive agreements reflecting other
terms of the proposed transaction, DryShips completion of
its due diligence review and board approval, on a transaction
that would occur in two stages: (i) no less than four weeks
after signing, DryShips would acquire the approximately 50.5%
equity interest in OceanFreight held directly or indirectly by
Mr. Kandylidis at a price per OceanFreight share equal to
$11.25 in cash and 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig and
(ii) DryShips would acquire all other shares of
OceanFreight for the same consideration by means of a one-step
merger of a newly-formed subsidiary of DryShips with
OceanFreight.
On July 20, 2011, OceanFreight requested certain due
diligence material regarding Ocean Rig, which was thereafter
provided.
On July 20, 2011, a meeting of the Audit Committee of
DryShips was held at which the Audit Committee of DryShips
indicated its preliminary approval to certain key proposed
business terms of the transaction, subject to further advice
from its advisors and final agreement on the terms and
documentation.
On July 22, 2011, OceanFreight reached an agreement,
subject to the negotiation of satisfactory documentation, with
its lenders under its senior credit facility to waive the
change of control event of default that the
transaction would have triggered.
On July 25, 2011, the DryShips board of directors met to
consider the transaction. After discussions by the DryShips
board of directors with its advisors, the Audit Committee of
DryShips recommended the transaction to the board of directors
of DryShips. The board of directors of DryShips approved the
transaction on the same date.
On July 25, 2011, the OceanFreight Special Committee met to
approve the transaction. Fearnley, which acted as the financial
advisor to the OceanFreight Special Committee, delivered its
fairness opinion at the meeting by presenting its conclusion
that the merger consideration to be received by the holders of
OceanFreight common stock was fair from a financial point of
view to such holders. Fearnley also delivered its written
fairness opinion to the OceanFreight Special Committee on the
same date. Subsequently, Seward & Kissel LLP, the
legal advisor to OceanFreight, presented the structure of the
transaction and discussed the duties and obligations applicable
to the OceanFreight Special Committee. After the presentations,
the OceanFreight Special Committee, among other things,
unanimously approved and recommended the transaction to the
board of directors of OceanFreight and unanimously approved and
recommended that the merger agreement be submitted to the
OceanFreight shareholders for their approval and that
OceanFreights rights plan, the interested shareholder
provisions of OceanFreights third amended and restated
articles of incorporation, and the standstill provisions
contained in its non-disclosure agreement with DryShips, be
modified
and/or
waived in order to permit the consummation of the transaction.
After reviewing the OceanFreight Special Committees
recommendations, the OceanFreight board of directors, among
other things, unanimously approved the transaction, unanimously
directed that the merger agreement be submitted to the
OceanFreight shareholders for their approval, and unanimously
approved the foregoing modifications
and/or
waivers to OceanFreights rights plan, the interested
shareholder provisions of OceanFreights third amended and
restated articles of incorporation, and the standstill
provisions contained in its non-disclosure agreement with
DryShips, on the same date.
65
On July 26, 2011, the parties signed the merger agreement
and the purchase agreement and announced the transaction.
On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the terms of the purchase
agreement, DryShips acquired the OceanFreight shares held by the
entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis, representing a
majority of the outstanding shares of OceanFreight. The
consideration paid by DryShips for each OceanFreight share
consisted of (x) $11.25 in cash and
(y) 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock, with
cash paid in lieu of fractional shares.
OceanFreights
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the OceanFreight
Special Committee and Board of Directors
OceanFreight
Special Committee
On May 27, 2011, following the receipt by
Mr. Kandylidis of an expression of interest from DryShips,
the OceanFreight board of directors constituted a special
committee comprised of its independent members,
Messrs. John Liveris, George Biniaris and Panagiotis
Korakas, and authorized the OceanFreight Special Committee to
review the transactions proposed by DryShips and alternatives
thereto, and to evaluate, negotiate and make recommendations to
the OceanFreight board of directors in connection with any
proposed transaction. The OceanFreight Special Committee, with
the advice and assistance of its legal and financial advisors,
evaluated and negotiated the transaction, including the terms
and conditions of the merger agreement and the related
agreements, with DryShips. Following the negotiations, the
OceanFreight Special Committee, among other things,
(i) unanimously determined that the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are fair and reasonable to,
and in the best interests of, the OceanFreight shareholders
(other than DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings Inc., Basset
Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel Investments Limited and Haywood
Finance Limited) and (ii) unanimously approved and
recommended to the OceanFreight board of directors that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, be submitted to the OceanFreight
shareholders for their approval.
In the course of reaching its determination and making the
recommendation described above, the OceanFreight Special
Committee considered a number of factors and a significant
amount of information, including substantial discussions with
its legal and financial advisors. The principal factors and
benefits that the OceanFreight Special Committee believes
support its conclusion are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
The current and historical prices of OceanFreights common
stock and the fact that the per share merger consideration of
$11.25 in cash and 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock
represents a premium of approximately 109.6% over the closing
price of $9.47 per share of OceanFreights common stock on
July 25, 2011, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the merger.
|
|
|
|
The OceanFreight Special Committees familiarity with the
business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects
and competitive position of OceanFreight, including the
challenges faced by OceanFreight in the international dry bulk
shipping industry and the prospects and challenges for continued
growth and profitability of OceanFreight.
|
|
|
|
The OceanFreight Special Committees view that the merger
is more favorable to OceanFreights shareholders than the
possible alternatives to the merger, including continuing to
operate OceanFreight as an independent publicly traded company
or pursuing other strategic alternatives, because of the
uncertain returns to such shareholders in light of
OceanFreights business, operations, financial condition
and obligations (including OceanFreights debt and
newbuilding obligations), strategy and prospects, as well as the
risks involved in achieving those returns, the uncertainties
surrounding the availability of future equity or debt financing,
the nature of the dry bulk shipping industry, and general
industry, economic and market conditions, both on a historical
and on a prospective basis.
|
|
|
|
The fact that the merger consideration contains a significant
cash component, so that the transaction allows
OceanFreights shareholders to realize immediately a
considerable portion of their investment in cash and provides
such shareholders with a level of certainty as to the value of
their shares.
|
|
|
|
OceanFreights shareholders ability to participate in
the potential growth of Ocean Rig following the merger, with the
added condition that if the merger is not completed by
January 26, 2012, due to delays with
|
66
respect to the registration of the Ocean Rig shares with the
SEC or the NASDAQ listing of such shares, the merger
consideration payable for each OceanFreight share will be
converted into $22.50 in cash.
|
|
|
|
|
The terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including
(i) the limited conditions to DryShips obligations to
close the merger, (ii) the ability of OceanFreight under
certain conditions to consider unsolicited alternative
acquisition proposals prior to August 23, 2011, and
(iii) the restrictions on the conduct of Ocean Rigs
business prior to the completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Prior to the effective time of the merger, DryShips will not
vote any shares of OceanFreight common stock owned beneficially
or of record by it, Pelican Stockholdings Inc. or any of
DryShips other subsidiaries in favor of the removal of any
OceanFreight director or in favor of the election of any
director not approved by the OceanFreight Special Committee.
|
|
|
|
The opinion of Fearnley, dated July 25, 2011, to the
OceanFreight Special Committee as to the fairness as of such
date, from a financial point of view, of the merger
consideration to the holders of OceanFreights common
stock, based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions,
limitations, qualifications and other matters set forth in the
written opinion. See Opinion of
OceanFreights Financial Advisor and Annex C to
this proxy statement prospectus.
|
The OceanFreight Special Committee also considered a variety of
risks and other potential negative factors concerning the merger
agreement, the merger and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The risks and costs associated with the merger not being
completed in a timely manner or at all, including the diversion
of management and employee attention, potential employee
attrition, the potential effect on business and customer
relationships and potential litigation arising from the merger
agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby.
|
|
|
|
The recent decline in dry bulk charter rates and the uncertainty
as to whether and to what extent the dry bulk charter market
would recover, including the impact that this decline may have
had on the price that DryShips was willing to pay to acquire
OceanFreight.
|
|
|
|
DryShips would acquire the OceanFreight shares held by entities
controlled by Mr. Kandylidis, representing a majority of
the outstanding shares of OceanFreight, prior to the merger.
DryShips would commit to vote the OceanFreight shares so
acquired FOR the approval of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the merger agreement, (i) OceanFreight
may not solicit other acquisition proposals and
(ii) OceanFreight, in certain circumstances, may be
required to pay DryShips a $4.5 million termination fee if
the merger agreement is terminated.
|
|
|
|
The risk that, while the merger is expected to be completed,
there can be no assurance that all conditions to the
parties obligations to consummate the merger will be
satisfied, and, as a result, it is possible that the merger may
not be completed even if approved by OceanFreights
shareholders.
|
|
|
|
The restrictions on the conduct of OceanFreights business
prior to the completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
The fact that the OceanFreight Special Committee did not solicit
alternative proposals prior to executing the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
That the merger consideration was fixed and therefore the value
of the consideration payable to OceanFreight shareholders would
decrease in the event that the value of Ocean Rig shares
decreased prior to closing.
|
|
|
|
That OceanFreight shareholders will not be entitled to appraisal
rights under Marshall Islands law.
|
|
|
|
The substantial transactional costs and expenses expected to be
incurred by OceanFreight in connection with the proposed
transaction.
|
|
|
|
The interests of OceanFreights directors and management in
the merger, including those described under the section entitled
Interests of OceanFreights Directors and
Officers in the Merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various other applicable risks associated with OceanFreight and
the merger, including those described under the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 29.
|
67
The above discussion is not exhaustive, but it addresses the
material factors considered by the OceanFreight Special
Committee in connection with the proposed transaction. In view
of the variety of factors and the amount of information
considered, as well as the complexity of that information, the
OceanFreight Special Committee does not find it practicable to,
and did not, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights
to the specific factors it considered in reaching its decision.
In addition, individual members of the OceanFreight Special
Committee may have given different weight to different factors.
This explanation of the OceanFreight Special Committees
reasoning, and all other information presented in this section,
is forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be read in
light of the factors discussed under the section entitled
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
The OceanFreight Special Committee unanimously recommends that
OceanFreights shareholders vote FOR the
approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and to
approve the merger.
OceanFreight
Board of Directors
The OceanFreight board of directors met on July 25, 2011,
to consider the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby. On the basis of the OceanFreight Special
Committees recommendations and the other factors described
below, the OceanFreight board of directors, among other things,
(i) determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are
fair and reasonable to, and in the best interests of,
OceanFreight and its shareholders (other than DryShips, Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel
Investments Limited and Haywood Finance Limited),
(ii) adopted and approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and
(iii) resolved to recommend to the OceanFreight
shareholders that they approve the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. See
Background of the Transaction.
In determining that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair and
reasonable to, and in the best interests of OceanFreight and its
shareholders (other than DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings Inc.,
Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel Investments Limited and
Haywood Finance Limited), the OceanFreight board of directors
considered:
|
|
|
|
|
the unanimous determination and recommendation of the
OceanFreight Special Committee; and
|
|
|
|
the factors considered by the OceanFreight Special Committee as
described in OceanFreights Reasons for
the Merger; Recommendation of the OceanFreight Special Committee
and Board of Directors OceanFreight Special
Committee, including the positive factors and potential
benefits of the merger agreement and the merger and the risks
and potentially negative factors relating to the merger
agreement and the merger.
|
The above discussion is not exhaustive, but it addresses the
material factors considered by the OceanFreight board of
directors in connection with the proposed transaction. In view
of the variety of factors and the amount of information
considered, as well as the complexity of that information, the
OceanFreight board of directors does not find it practicable to,
and did not, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights
to the specific factors it considered in reaching its decision.
The OceanFreight board of directors discussed the factors
described above and asked questions of OceanFreights
management and its advisors. This determination was made after
the OceanFreight board of directors considered all of the
factors as a whole. In addition, individual members of the
OceanFreight board of directors may have given different weight
to different factors. This explanation of the OceanFreight board
of directors reasoning, and all other information
presented in this section, is forward-looking in nature and,
therefore, should be read in light of the factors discussed
under the section entitled Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.
Based in part on the recommendation of the OceanFreight Special
Committee, the OceanFreight board of directors, by the unanimous
vote of the directors, recommends that OceanFreights
shareholders vote FOR the approval of the proposal
to adopt the merger agreement and to approve the merger.
68
Opinion
of OceanFreights Financial Advisor
On July 25, 2011, at a meeting of the OceanFreight Special
Committee held to evaluate the proposed transaction, Fearnley
delivered to the OceanFreight Special Committee an oral opinion,
which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion
dated July 25, 2011, to the effect that, as of that date
and based upon and subject to various assumptions, matters
considered and limitations described in its opinion, the merger
consideration to be received by the holders of OceanFreight
common stock was fair from a financial point of view to such
holders.
The full text of Fearnleys opinion describes the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by Fearnley. This opinion
is included as Annex C to this proxy
statement / prospectus. Fearnleys opinion was
provided for the benefit of the OceanFreight Special Committee
in connection with, and for the purpose of, its evaluation of
the merger, and addresses only the fairness of the merger
consideration to be received by the holders of OceanFreight
common stock from a financial point of view. The opinion does
not address any other aspect of the proposed transaction, and
does not constitute a recommendation as to how any holder of
OceanFreight common stock should vote with respect to the merger
or any matter related thereto. The summary of Fearnleys
opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion. Holders of shares of
OceanFreight common stock are urged to read Fearnleys
opinion carefully and in its entirety.
In arriving at its opinion, Fearnley, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial and other
information about OceanFreight, and held discussions with
members of senior management of OceanFreight concerning such
matters;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain information furnished to Fearnley by the
management of OceanFreight, including financial forecasts and
analyses, relating to the business, operations and prospects of
OceanFreight, and held discussions with members of senior
management of OceanFreight concerning such matters;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the share trading price history and valuation multiples
for OceanFreight common stock and Ocean Rig common stock and
compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies
that Fearnley deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that Fearnley
deemed relevant; and
|
|
|
|
conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as Fearnley deemed appropriate.
|
In connection with its review and analysis and in rendering its
opinion, Fearnley assumed and relied upon, but did not assume
any responsibility to independently investigate or verify, the
accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information
that was supplied or otherwise made available by OceanFreight
and DryShips or that was publicly available (including, without
limitation, the information described above), or that was
otherwise reviewed by Fearnley. Fearnley relied upon the
assurances of the respective managements of OceanFreight and
DryShips that they were not aware of any facts or circumstances
that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. In
connection with its review, Fearnley did not obtain any
independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or
liabilities of, nor did it conduct a physical inspection of any
of the properties or facilities of, OceanFreight or DryShips,
nor did Fearnley assume any responsibility to obtain any such
evaluations or appraisals.
Projecting future results of any company is inherently subject
to uncertainty. With respect to the financial forecasts provided
to and examined by Fearnley, OceanFreight informed Fearnley, and
Fearnley assumed, that such financial forecasts were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and good faith judgments of the management of
OceanFreight as to the future financial performance of
OceanFreight. Fearnley expressed no opinion as to the financial
forecasts provided to it by OceanFreight or the assumptions on
which they were made.
Fearnleys opinion was based on economic, monetary,
regulatory, market and other conditions existing and which could
be evaluated as of the date of the opinion. Fearnley expressly
disclaimed any undertaking or obligation
69
to advise any person of any change in any fact or matter
affecting its opinion of which it became aware after the date of
the opinion.
Fearnley made no independent investigation of any legal or
accounting matters affecting OceanFreight or DryShips, and
Fearnley assumed the correctness in all respects material to its
analysis of all legal and accounting advice given to
OceanFreight, the OceanFreight Special Committee and the
OceanFreight board of directors, including, without limitation,
advice as to the legal, accounting and tax consequences of the
terms of, and transactions contemplated by, the merger agreement
to OceanFreight and its shareholders. In addition, in preparing
its opinion, Fearnley did not take into account any tax
consequences of the transaction to any holder of OceanFreight
common stock. Fearnley also assumed that in the course of
obtaining the necessary regulatory or third-party approvals,
consents and releases for the merger, no delay, limitation,
restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on OceanFreight, DryShips, Ocean Rig or the
contemplated benefits of the merger.
Fearnleys opinion does not address the relative merits of
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement as
compared to any alternative transaction or opportunity that
might be available to OceanFreight, nor does it address the
underlying business decision by OceanFreight to engage in the
merger or the terms of the merger agreement or the documents
referred to therein. In addition, Fearnley was not asked to
address, and its opinion does not address, the fairness to, or
any other consideration of, the holders of any class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of OceanFreight,
other than the holders of shares of OceanFreight common stock.
Fearnley expressed no opinion as to the price at which shares of
OceanFreight common stock or Ocean Rig common stock would trade
at any time. Furthermore, Fearnley did not express any view or
opinion as to the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the
amount or nature of any compensation payable or to be received
by any of OceanFreights officers, directors or employees,
or any class of such persons, in connection with the merger.
The following is a brief summary of the material financial
analyses presented to the OceanFreight Special Committee in
connection with Fearnleys opinion on July 25, 2011.
The financial analyses summarized below include information
presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand
Fearnleys financial analyses, the tables must be read
together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the data below without considering the full
narrative description of the financial analyses, including the
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of Fearnleys
financial analyses. Quantitative information set forth below, to
the extent it is based on market data, is, except as otherwise
indicated, based on market data as it existed at or prior to
July 25, 2011, and is not necessarily indicative of current
or future market conditions. Financial data of OceanFreight set
forth below was based on OceanFreight public filings and certain
financial forecasts and estimates prepared by
OceanFreights management that the OceanFreight Special
Committee directed Fearnley to utilize for purposes of its
analyses.
Analysis
Calculation
of offer value
Fearnley assumed that the offer value to the holders of
OceanFreight common stock corresponded to approximately $20.14
per share of OceanFreight as of July 22, 2011, the last
trading day prior to the release of Fearnleys opinion.
This offer value would consist of the cash consideration of
$11.25 and the assumed market value of the Ocean Rig settlement
shares which would amount to approximately $8.89 per share of
OceanFreight.
Fearnley noted that there was considerable uncertainty in the
valuation of the Ocean Rig settlement shares, as these were at
the relevant time only traded in the
over-the-counter
market in Oslo, Norway. The assumed value of the Ocean Rig
settlement shares was based on the trading price on the
over-the-counter
market as of July 22, 2011, which was approximately $17 per
share. Fearnley noted that Ocean Rig had undertaken a
$500 million share placement in December 2010 at $17.50 per
share, and also noted that the trading price had fluctuated
since that placement. Fearnley further noted that a contemplated
listing of Ocean Rigs shares on NASDAQ could have a
positive impact on the trading volume and investor
attractiveness and potentially on the pricing of Ocean
Rigs shares.
70
Comparison
of offer value to share price
Fearnley noted that the closing price of OceanFreight common
stock on July 22, 2011, the last trading day prior to the
release of Fearnleys opinion was $7.06. Based on this
closing price and the offer value as set out above, the offer
value represented a premium of approximately 185%.
Fearnley also noted that the trading price of the OceanFreight
common stock had been subject to a significant decline over a
period of at least 36 months. Similar declines have been
experienced for many other companies in the maritime sector, and
may be a reflection of declines in underlying ship values.
Net asset
value analysis
Fearnley performed a net asset value analysis for
OceanFreights fleet using two alternative valuation
estimates that OceanFreight management had received from outside
ship valuation companies. The estimates included fair market
value estimates for each vessel in OceanFreights fleet as
well as fair market value estimates of each of
OceanFreights contracted vessels under construction
(referred to as new-build vessels), as if each such
new-build vessel was a readily delivered vessel.
Fearnley subtracted OceanFreights net debt and remaining
new-build commitments, as estimated by OceanFreights
management as of June 2011, from the total fair market value of
OceanFreights fleet, to arrive at a Steel Net Asset
Value.
As the fair market value estimates assume that each vessel can
be chartered at prevailing market rates, to the extent
applicable, Fearnley adjusted values to reflect the anticipated
cash flows over the life of the vessels existing charter.
Fearnley added these values to the Steel Net Asset Value to
arrive at an implied net asset value for OceanFreights
owned fleet. In the calculation of such charter values, Fearnley
discounted the difference between actual rates under the
respective charters and the assumed market rates for similar
charters, with a discount rate of 8% p.a. The assumed market
rates were based on available market sources, in-house
assessments and discussions with OceanFreight management.
The fair market value estimates provided were, as is customary
in ship valuation, based on an assessment of the values that
could be achieved in transactions involving a willing buyer and
a willing seller. There can be no assurance that these values
can be realized in actual transactions. Fearnley noted, in
particular, that current sale and purchase activity in the
maritime market is limited and that the valuations must
therefore be regarded as uncertain. In order to reflect this
uncertainty, Fearnley provided calculations of alternative net
asset values if the aggregate value of vessels and charters were
to be reduced by 10% and 20%.
71
The results of these analyses were as follows:
Value in $ millions
except per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate 1
|
|
Estimate 2
|
|
Fair market of sailing vessels
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Fair market value of new-build vessel
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Other fixed assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Less: Net debt
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Less: New-build commitments
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
Steel net asset value
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Plus: Charter rate impact
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Net asset value
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
23.03
|
|
|
$
|
21.85
|
|
Impact of 10% reduction in value of vessels, new-build vessels
and charters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
14.31
|
|
|
$
|
13.25
|
|
Impact of 20% reduction in value of vessels, new-build vessels
and charters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
5.60
|
|
|
$
|
4.66
|
|
Based on these analyses, Fearnley derived an implied net asset
value per share range for OceanFreights common stock of
$21.85 to $23.03, before application of any adjustments to
reflect the uncertainty of such valuations. Fearnleys
calculations of alternative net asset values based on such
adjustments resulted in a significantly lower implied net asset
value per share range for OceanFreights common stock.
Fearnley further noted that OceanFreight has large new-build
obligations that are partially unfunded. While part of the
funding requirements can be assumed to be available in the debt
market, there is also a strong likelihood that such funding will
also require additional equity. Fearnley noted that in its view,
equity raising is challenging at present and may therefore be
dilutive to shareholders. Such dilution is not taken into
account in the calculation of net asset value above.
Fearnleys opinion was provided for the information of
the OceanFreight Special Committee in its evaluation of the
merger and did not constitute a recommendation of the merger to
OceanFreight or a recommendation to any holder of OceanFreight
common stock as to how that holder should vote on any matters
relating to the merger.
The preceding discussion is a summary of the material financial
analyses furnished by Fearnley to the OceanFreight Special
Committee, but does not purport to be a complete description of
the analyses performed by Fearnley or of its presentation to the
OceanFreight Special Committee. The preparation of financial
analyses and fairness opinions is a complex process involving
subjective judgments and is not necessarily susceptible to
partial analysis or summary description. Fearnley made no
attempt to assign specific weights to particular analyses or
factors considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to
the significance and relevance of all the analyses and factors
considered and determined to give its fairness opinion as
described above. Accordingly, Fearnley believes that its
analyses, and the summary set forth above, must be considered as
a whole, and that selecting portions of the analyses and of the
factors considered by Fearnley, without considering all of the
analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete
view of the processes underlying the analyses conducted by
Fearnley and its opinion.
In its analyses, Fearnley made numerous assumptions with respect
to OceanFreight, DryShips, Ocean Rig, industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the control of
OceanFreight, DryShips and Ocean Rig. Any estimates contained in
Fearnleys
72
analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or
predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by
these analyses. Estimates of values of companies do not purport
to be appraisals or to necessarily reflect the prices at which
companies may actually be sold. Because these estimates are
inherently subject to uncertainty, none of OceanFreight,
DryShips, Ocean Rig, the OceanFreight Special Committee or board
of directors, the DryShips board of directors, Ocean Rig or any
other person assumes responsibility if future results or actual
values differ materially from the estimates.
Fearnleys analyses were prepared solely as part of
Fearnleys analysis of the fairness of the merger
consideration and were provided to the OceanFreight Special
Committee in that connection. The opinion of Fearnley was only
one of the factors taken into consideration by the OceanFreight
Special Committee in making its determination to approve the
merger agreement and the merger. See the section of this proxy
statement / prospectus entitled
OceanFreights Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendation of the OceanFreight Special Committee and Board
of Directors.
Miscellaneous
Under the terms of Fearnleys engagement, OceanFreight has
agreed to pay Fearnley for its financial advisory services in
connection with the proposed transaction an aggregate fee of
approximately $501,709, of which approximately $351,709 is
contingent upon the consummation of the merger. In addition,
OceanFreight has agreed to reimburse Fearnley for its reasonable
and documented
out-of-pocket
expenses, and to indemnify Fearnley and related parties against
liabilities relating to or arising out of its engagement.
In the ordinary course of its business, Fearnley and its
affiliates may trade or hold securities of OceanFreight,
DryShips, Ocean Rig
and/or their
respective affiliates for its own account and for the accounts
of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold long or
short positions in those securities. In addition, Fearnley may
seek to, in the future, provide financial advisory and financing
services to OceanFreight, DryShips, Ocean Rig or entities that
are affiliated with OceanFreight, DryShips or Ocean Rig, for
which Fearnley would expect to receive compensation. Fearnley
has in the past provided services to Ocean Rig, including as a
lead manager in its $500 million private placement of
equity in December 2010 and as a lead manager in its
$500 million private placement of unsecured bonds in April
2011.
Interests
of OceanFreights Directors and Officers in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of the OceanFreight board of
directors to vote for the approval of the merger agreement,
OceanFreights shareholders should be aware that certain
members of the OceanFreight board of directors and executive
officers have interests that are different from,
and/or in
addition to, the interests of OceanFreights shareholders
generally. These interests, to the extent material, are
described below. The independent members of the OceanFreight
board of directors were aware of these differing interests and
potential conflicts and considered them, among other matters, in
evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement, the merger, and
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and in
recommending to OceanFreights shareholders that the merger
agreement be approved.
Purchase
and Sale Agreement
Entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief Executive
Officer of OceanFreight, are parties to the purchase agreement
under which DryShips purchased on August 24, 2011 the
Seller Shares owned by these entities for consideration per
share equal to (x) $11.25 in cash and
(y) 0.52326 shares of Ocean Rig common stock (with
cash paid in lieu of fractional shares). See The Purchase
and Sale Agreement.
Consultancy
Agreement
OceanFreight and Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a company
wholly-owned by Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief Executive Officer
of OceanFreight, entered into a consultancy agreement, effective
January 1, 2008, which granted Steel Wheel Investments
Limited the right, upon a change of control of OceanFreight, to
cease providing services to OceanFreight and collect from
OceanFreight a change of control payment equal to three times
the annual base fee under the consultancy agreement. The
consultancy agreement, as subsequently amended, provided for an
annual
73
base fee payable to Steel Wheel Investments Limited of
900,000. Pursuant to an addendum to the consultancy
agreement dated July 25, 2011, OceanFreight and Steel Wheel
Investments Limited modified the consultancy agreement to
provide that the consultancy agreement would terminate upon the
closing of the merger (rather than upon the earlier change of
control resulting from DryShips acquisition of
OceanFreight shares pursuant to the purchase agreement) at which
time Steel Wheel Investments Limited would receive its
2.7 million change of control payment (3x the
900,000 annual base fee). Under the addendum, OceanFreight
and Steel Wheel Investments Limited agreed that
Mr. Kandylidis will continue to provide his services as
Chief Executive Officer and member of the OceanFreight board of
directors, and Steel Wheel Investments Limited is entitled to
the continued payment of its base fee, until the later of
December 31, 2011 or the closing of the merger.
Employment
Agreements
Under the terms of the merger agreement, DryShips has agreed to
use its reasonable best efforts to enter into employment
agreements with OceanFreights President and Chief
Operating Officer, Demetris Nenes, and Chief Financial Officer,
Solon Dracoulis.
Director
and Officer Indemnification and Insurance
Under the terms of the merger agreement, from the effective time
of the merger through the sixth anniversary of the effective
time of the merger, DryShips will cause OceanFreight, as the
surviving corporation, to indemnify and hold harmless to the
fullest extent permitted by law each current and former director
and officer of OceanFreight and its subsidiaries against all
claims, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, inquiries,
fines and reasonable fees, costs and expenses, including
attorneys fees and disbursements, incurred in connection
with any litigation, claim, actions, proceedings, arbitrations,
mediations or investigations, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to
the fact that such person was a director, officer or fiduciary
agent of OceanFreight or its subsidiaries, whether such fact
existed or occurred at or prior to the effective time of the
merger.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, for six years after the
effective date of the merger, DryShips must cause OceanFreight,
as the surviving corporation, to maintain provisions in the
articles of incorporation and bylaws of OceanFreight or any
successor regarding elimination of liability of directors and
officers of OceanFreight, indemnification of directors and
officers of OceanFreight and advancement of expenses that are no
less advantageous to the intended beneficiaries than the
provisions existing on the date of the merger agreement.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, either OceanFreight
must obtain and fully pay the premium for the non-cancellable
extension of directors and officers insurance
policies and OceanFreights existing fiduciary liability
insurance policies for a discovery period of at least six years
for claims relating to any time before the effective time of the
merger or DryShips must cause OceanFreight, as the surviving
corporation, to maintain OceanFreights existing cover or
equivalent cover for at least six years, subject to a cap on the
cost of such cover.
Legal
and Advisory Fees
Under the purchase agreement, all legal fees and other advisory
fees up to an aggregate of $1,500,000 incurred by entities
controlled by Mr. Kandylidis in connection with the sale of
their shares of OceanFreight common stock to DryShips will be
paid by OceanFreight upon the consummation of the merger.
Restricted
Stock
In connection with the closing of the purchase agreement, which
occurred on August 24, 2011, restricted OceanFreight stock
held by certain of OceanFreights officers and directors
and their affiliates vested.
74
The table below sets forth the restricted OceanFreight common
stock held by certain of OceanFreights directors and
officers and their affiliates and the amount of stock that
vested in connection with the closing of the purchase agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Shares of
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
that Vested in Connection
|
|
|
|
with the Closing of the
|
|
Name
|
|
Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
Steel Wheel Investments Limited (a company controlled by
Mr. Kandylidis)
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
Tsunami Shipping Inc. (a company controlled by Demetris Nenes)
|
|
|
556
|
|
Waylon International Limited (a company controlled by Solon
Dracoulis)
|
|
|
222
|
|
Sturgeon International Corp. (a company controlled by Konstandia
Papaefthymiou)
|
|
|
111
|
|
John Liveris
|
|
|
778
|
|
Panagiotis Korakas
|
|
|
111
|
|
Konstantinos Kandylidis
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL:
|
|
|
35,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures
for Exchanging Shares of OceanFreight Stock and Distribution of
the Merger Consideration
Prior to the completion of the merger, DryShips will deposit or
cause to be deposited with an exchange agent, which will be
appointed by DryShips, the cash portion of the merger
consideration and shares of Ocean Rig common stock to be issued
in the merger. DryShips will make available to the exchange
agent, from time to time, additional cash sufficient to pay cash
in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFreight common stock that
would be issued in the merger and any dividends or other
distributions with respect to the shares of Ocean Rig common
stock to which holders of shares of unsurrendered shares of
OceanFreight common stock after the completion of the merger may
be entitled.
Shortly after the completion of the merger, the exchange agent
will send a letter of transmittal and instructions to each
OceanFreight shareholder for use in effecting the surrender of
the OceanFreight stock certificates in exchange for the merger
consideration. Upon proper surrender of an OceanFreight stock
certificate for exchange and cancellation to the exchange agent,
together with a letter of transmittal and such other documents
as may be specified in the instructions, an OceanFreight
shareholder will be entitled to receive the merger consideration.
Six months after the completion of the merger, DryShips may
require the exchange agent to deliver to it the remaining cash
and shares of Ocean Rig common stock held by the exchange agent.
Any OceanFreight shareholder who has not by that time exchanged
the shares of OceanFreight common stock may be entitled to look
to DryShips for the merger consideration. DryShips, Pelican
Stockholdings Inc. or the exchange agent will not be liable to
any person in the event that any merger consideration is
delivered to a public official pursuant to abandoned property,
escheat and other similar laws.
Until an OceanFreight shareholder exchanges its OceanFreight
stock certificates for merger consideration, such shareholder
will not receive any dividends or other distributions in respect
of any shares of Ocean Rig common stock to which the
OceanFreight shareholder is entitled in connection with that
exchange. Once an OceanFreight shareholder exchanges its
OceanFreight stock certificates, such shareholder will receive,
without interest, any dividends or distributions with a record
date after the completion of the merger and payable with respect
to the shares of Ocean Rig common stock such shareholder
received.
If an OceanFreight shareholders OceanFreight stock
certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, such shareholder
may receive the merger consideration upon the making of an
affidavit of that fact. Such shareholder may be required to post
a bond in a reasonable amount as an indemnity against any claim
that may be made with respect to the lost, stolen or destroyed
OceanFreight stock certificate.
75
After the completion of the merger, there will be no further
transfer on the stock transfer books of OceanFreight and any
certificated shares of OceanFreight common stock presented to
the exchange agent or OceanFreight for any reason will be
cancelled and exchanged for the merger consideration.
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger
DryShips intends to account for the merger under the
acquisition method as defined under ASC 805
Business Combinations. Under the acquisition method, the
aggregate consideration paid by DryShips in connection with the
transaction will be allocated to OceanFreights net assets
based on their estimated fair values as of the completion of the
merger. The excess of the total purchase consideration over the
fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired will be
allocated to goodwill. This method may result in the carrying
value of assets, including goodwill, acquired from OceanFreight
being substantially different from the former carrying values of
those assets. The purchase price allocation is subject to
refinement as DryShips completes the valuation of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. The results of operations of
OceanFreight will be included in DryShips consolidated
results of operations only for periods subsequent to the
completion of the acquisition.
Delisting
and Deregistration of OceanFreight Common Stock
Shares of OceanFreight common stock currently trade on the
NASDAQ Global Market under the stock symbol OCNF.
When the merger is completed, the OceanFreight common stock
currently listed on the NASDAQ Global Market will cease to be
quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market and will be deregistered
under the Exchange Act.
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of the
merger agreement. The description may not contain all of the
information that is important to you. This summary is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is
included as Annex A to this document. Ocean Rig urges you
to read the entire merger agreement carefully.
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
that each of DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings Inc. and
OceanFreight have made as of specific dates. The assertions made
in those representations and warranties were made solely for
purposes of the contract among DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings
Inc. and OceanFreight and may be subject to important
qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in
connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement.
In addition, some of those representations and warranties may
not be accurate or complete as of any specified date, may be
subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from
what might be viewed as material to shareholders, or may have
been used for purposes of allocating risk between the respective
parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Shareholders
and other investors are not third-party beneficiaries under the
merger agreement and should not rely on the representations,
warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as
characterizations of the actual state of facts or conditions of
DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings Inc. and OceanFreight or any of
their respective subsidiaries or affiliates.
The
Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and
in accordance with the MIBCA, Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will
merge with and into OceanFreight. Following the merger, the
separate existence of Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will cease and
OceanFreight will continue its corporate existence under the
MIBCA as the surviving corporation in the merger.
Closing;
Effective Time
Closing
Unless the parties agree otherwise, the closing of the merger
will occur no later than the third business day after the
satisfaction or waiver of all of the closing conditions (other
than conditions that, by their nature, cannot be satisfied until
the closing). See Conditions to the
Merger for a description of the conditions that must be
satisfied or waived prior to the closing of the merger.
76
Effective
Time
The merger will become effective when the articles of merger
have been duly filed with the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of
Corporations of the Marshall Islands or such time as DryShips,
OceanFreight and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. may agree and
specify in the articles of merger in accordance with the MIBCA.
OceanFreight and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will cause the
articles of merger to be filed at the closing of the merger.
Merger
Consideration
Except as described in the following paragraph, each share of
OceanFreight common stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger will be converted into
the right to receive $11.25 in cash and 0.52326 shares of
Ocean Rig common stock, less any applicable withholding taxes;
provided, however, if the closing of the merger occurs at any
time after 5:30 p.m. New York time on January 26,
2012, at the effective time of the merger, each share of
OceanFreight common stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger will be converted into
the right to receive $22.50 in cash.
Each share of OceanFreight common stock held by OceanFreight as
treasury stock immediately prior to the effective time will be
canceled, and no payment will be made with respect thereto. Each
share of OceanFreight common stock held by DryShips or any
subsidiary of either OceanFreight or DryShips (including but not
limited to Pelican Stockholdings Inc.) immediately prior to the
effective time will be canceled, and no payment will be made
with respect thereto.
Each share of Pelican Stockholdings Inc. common stock
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be
converted into and become one share of OceanFreight common stock
with the same rights, powers and privileges as the shares so
converted and will constitute the only outstanding shares of
OceanFreight capital stock.
Exchange
and Payment Procedures
Prior to the effective time of the merger, DryShips will deliver
to an exchange agent reasonably acceptable to OceanFreight, for
purposes of exchanging for the OceanFreight common stock, the
appropriate amount of cash and certificates representing the
appropriate number of shares of Ocean Rig common stock
comprising the merger consideration. As soon as practicable
after the effective time of the merger, the exchange agent will
mail a letter of transmittal and instructions to the
shareholders, which will explain how to surrender OceanFreight
common stock certificates in exchange for the merger
consideration.
Shareholders will not be entitled to receive the merger
consideration until the OceanFreight stock certificate or
certificates are surrendered to the exchange agent, together
with a duly completed and executed letter of transmittal.
The merger consideration may be paid to a person other than the
person in whose name the corresponding OceanFreight certificate
is registered if the certificate is properly endorsed or is
otherwise in the proper form for transfer. In addition, the
person who surrenders such certificate or book-entry share must
either pay any transfer or other applicable taxes or establish
to the satisfaction of the exchange agent that such taxes have
been paid or are not applicable.
No interest will be paid or will accrue on the cash payable upon
surrender of the OceanFreight certificates. The exchange agent
will be entitled to deduct and withhold, and pay to the
appropriate taxing authorities, any applicable taxes from the
merger consideration. Any sum which is withheld and paid to a
taxing authority by the exchange agent will be deemed to have
been paid to the person with regard to whom it is withheld.
No fractions of a share of Ocean Rig common stock will be paid
in the merger, but each holder of shares of OceanFreight common
stock otherwise entitled to a fraction of a share of Ocean Rig
common stock will upon surrender of the certificate be entitled
to receive an amount of cash (without interest) determined by
multiplying $21.50 by the fractional share interest to which the
holder would otherwise be entitled.
There will be no further registration of transfers of shares of
OceanFreight common stock after the effective time of the
merger. If, after the effective time of the merger, certificates
are presented to OceanFreight, they will be canceled and
exchanged for the merger consideration, except as otherwise
required by applicable law.
77
DryShips and OceanFreight will not be liable to any OceanFreight
shareholder for cash or shares of Ocean Rig common stock
(including dividends or distributions) delivered to a public
official as required by any applicable abandoned property,
escheat or similar law.
Any portion of the cash or shares of Ocean Rig common stock made
available to the exchange agent (and any interest or other
income earned thereon) that remains unclaimed by shareholders of
OceanFreight common stock six months after the effective time
will be returned to DryShips, on demand, and any holder who has
not exchanged shares of OceanFreight common stock for the merger
consideration will thereafter look only to DryShips for payment
of the merger consideration without any interest thereon.
The exchange agent will invest any cash in the exchange fund as
directed by DryShips. Any interest and other income resulting
from such investments will be paid to DryShips.
Representations
and Warranties
OceanFreight made customary representations and warranties,
generally qualified by, among other things, filings since
January 1, 2010, by OceanFreight with the SEC. Some of
these representations and warranties were made to DryShips as of
specified dates. OceanFreights representations and
warranties in the merger agreement include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization and authority to enter into, and carry
out the obligations under, the merger agreement and
enforceability of the merger agreement and related filing
obligations;
|
|
|
|
noncontravention and absence of a breach of organizational
documents, law or material agreements;
|
|
|
|
capitalization and indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
status and ownership of subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
filing, and accuracy of documents filed and to be filed with,
the SEC, securities law compliance and disclosure controls and
procedures and NASDAQ stock market compliance;
|
|
|
|
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
taxes and tax returns;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws, orders and permits;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes and undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
|
tangible personal assets;
|
|
|
|
real property;
|
|
|
|
vessels and maritime matters;
|
|
|
|
material contracts;
|
|
|
|
absence of litigation which would challenge or delay the merger,
or had had or would reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
employee benefits;
|
|
|
|
labor and employment matters;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of the OceanFreight Special Committees
financial advisor;
|
|
|
|
fees and commissions in connection with the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
|
|
|
non-application of OceanFreights rights plan and
anti-takeover laws and corporate provisions;
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed interested party transactions;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain business practices; and
|
|
|
|
absence of existing discussions with respect to acquisition.
|
DryShips also made customary representations and warranties,
generally qualified by, among other things, filings since
January 1, 2010, by DryShips with the SEC. Some of the
representations and warranties were made to OceanFreight as of
specified dates. DryShips representations and warranties
in the merger agreement, which, as applicable, relate to
DryShips, Ocean Rig and Pelican Stockholdings Inc., include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization and authority to enter into, and carry
out the obligations under, the merger agreement and
enforceability of the merger agreement and related filing
obligations;
|
|
|
|
noncontravention and absence of a breach of organizational
documents, law or material agreements;
|
|
|
|
filing, and accuracy of documents filed and to be filed with,
the SEC, securities law compliance and disclosure controls and
procedures;
|
|
|
|
fees and commissions in connection with the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
|
|
|
capitalization and indebtedness of Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
status and ownership of subsidiaries of Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
financial statements of Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
compliance of Ocean Rig with laws, orders and permits;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes and undisclosed liabilities of Ocean
Rig;
|
|
|
|
material contracts of Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
tangible personal assets of Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
labor and employment matters of Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters of Ocean Rig; and
|
|
|
|
absence of litigation which would challenge or delay the merger,
or had had or would reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect on Ocean Rig.
|
For purposes of the merger agreement, a material adverse
effect with respect to OceanFreight means (i) a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, business,
assets (including vessels), liabilities, or results of
operations of OceanFreight and OceanFreights subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, other than an effect that arises or results
from any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable law or changes in GAAP;
|
|
|
|
changes in global political financial or securities markets or
general global economic or political conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes or conditions generally affecting the industry in which
OceanFreight and its subsidiaries operate;
|
|
|
|
acts of war, sabotage, terrorism or natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
other than for purposes of noncontravention and employee
benefits compliance, the announcement or consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the
purchase agreement;
|
except, in the case of the first four points above, to the
extent such matter has a disproportionate effect on OceanFreight
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, compared with other
companies operating in the same industry; or (ii) any
event, circumstance or effect that materially impairs the
ability of OceanFreight to perform its obligations under the
merger agreement or materially delays the consummation of the
merger.
79
For purposes of the merger agreement, a material adverse
effect with respect to Ocean Rig means a material adverse
effect on the financial condition, business, assets,
liabilities, or results of operations of Ocean Rig and Ocean
Rigs subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than an effect
that arises or results from any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable law or changes in GAAP;
|
|
|
|
changes in global political financial or securities markets or
general global economic or political conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes or conditions generally affecting the industry in which
Ocean Rig and its subsidiaries operate;
|
|
|
|
acts of war, sabotage, terrorism or natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
the announcement or consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and the purchase agreement;
|
except, in the case of the first four points above, to the
extent such matter has a disproportionate effect on Ocean Rig
and its subsidiaries, taken as whole, compared with other
companies operating in the same industry.
For purposes of the merger agreement, a material adverse
effect with respect to DryShips means any event,
circumstance or effect that (i) materially impairs the
ability of DryShips or Pelican Stockholdings Inc. to perform its
obligations under the merger agreement or (ii) materially
delays the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement.
The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do
not survive the effective time of the merger. If the merger
agreement is validly terminated, there will be no liability
under the representations and warranties of the parties, or
otherwise under the merger agreement, except as described below
under Effect of Termination and
Termination Fee and Expenses.
Conduct
of OceanFreights Business Pending the Merger
Under the merger agreement, OceanFreight has agreed to, during
the period from the date of the merger agreement until the
effective time of the merger, except as expressly contemplated
or permitted by the merger agreement, carry on its business in
the ordinary course and in a manner consistent with past
practice and to use its reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
preserve intact its present business organization, goodwill and
material assets;
|
|
|
|
maintain in effect all governmental authorizations required to
carry on its business as now conducted;
|
|
|
|
keep available the services of its present officers and other
employees (provided that OceanFreight will not be required to
increase the compensation of present officers and
employees); and
|
|
|
|
preserve its present relationships with customers, suppliers and
others with which it has a business relationship.
|
OceanFreight has also agreed to comply with a series of negative
covenants.
Conduct
of Ocean Rigs Business Pending the Merger; Conduct of
DryShips
Under the merger agreement, DryShips has agreed that, except as
expressly required by the merger agreement or with
OceanFreights prior written consent, during the period
from the date of the merger agreement until the effective time
of the merger, DryShips will cause Ocean Rig and each of Ocean
Rigs subsidiaries to carry on its business in the ordinary
course and to use reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
preserve intact its business organization, goodwill and material
assets;
|
|
|
|
maintain all required governmental authorizations;
|
|
|
|
keep available the services of its present officers and other
employees, with certain exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
preserve present customer, supplier and other business
relationships.
|
80
No
Solicitation
OceanFreight and its subsidiaries have agreed to (and
OceanFreight has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to
cause its or any of its subsidiaries representatives to)
cease immediately any existing activities, solicitations,
encouragements, discussions or negotiations with any party
regarding an acquisition proposal.
During the period between the date of the merger agreement and
the earlier of the termination of the merger agreement or the
effective time of the merger, OceanFreight and its subsidiaries
have agreed not to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit or encourage any acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations
with, furnish any information relating to OceanFreight or any of
its subsidiaries or provide access to the business, properties,
assets, books or records of OceanFreight or any of its
subsidiaries to any third party with respect to inquiries
regarding, or the making of, an acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
fail to make, withdraw, or modify or amend in a manner adverse
to DryShips the recommendation of either the OceanFreight
Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of directors, or
recommend any other acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
grant any waiver or release under any standstill or similar
agreement with respect to any class of equity securities of
OceanFreight or any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse, recommend, enter into, or make a public
proposal regarding, any agreement in principle, letter of
intent, term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement,
option agreement or other similar agreement relating to an
acquisition proposal, with the exception of a confidentiality
agreement with a permitted third party;
|
|
|
|
approve any transaction under Article K of
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation (which relates to business combinations); or
|
|
|
|
redeem the rights issued to holders of OceanFreights
common stock pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated
Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated as of April 8, 2011,
amend or modify or terminate OceanFreights rights plan or
exempt any person from, or approve any transaction under,
OceanFreights rights plan. On August 22, 2011
OceanFreight entered into the Third Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement pursuant to which the definition
of Acquiring Person was amended in connection with
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the
purchase agreement.
|
Any failure by a representative of OceanFreight and its
subsidiaries to comply with the above restrictions is a breach
by OceanFreight regardless of whether OceanFreight used its
reasonable best efforts to cause compliance.
Notwithstanding these restrictions:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to August 23, 2011, OceanFreight was permitted to:
(i) engage in negotiations or discussions with any third
party, that made an unsolicited written acquisition proposal
after the date of the merger agreement that did not otherwise
result from a breach of the merger agreement if the OceanFreight
Special Committee reasonably believed in good faith, after
consulting with external legal and financial advisors, that the
proposal would reasonably have been expected to lead to a
superior proposal (as defined below) and (ii) thereafter
furnished to such third party non-public information relating to
OceanFreight or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to a
confidentiality agreement, if, in the case of the actions
described in clauses (i) or (ii) above, the
OceanFreight Special Committee determined in good faith, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to
take such action would have been reasonably likely to result in
a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law and
OceanFreight had provided DryShips two business days notice of
its intention to take any action discussed in (i) or
(ii) above; provided that all such information provided or
made available to such third party (to the extent that such
information had not been previously provided or made available
to DryShips) was provided or made available to DryShips, as the
case may have been, prior to or substantially concurrently with
the time it was provided or made available to such third
party; and
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to OceanFreights shareholders approving the merger,
the OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of
directors may withdraw its recommendation in favor of the
proposed merger in response to a material fact, event, change,
development or set of circumstances (other than an acquisition
proposal) arising during the period after the date of the merger
agreement and before the approval of OceanFreight shareholders,
which was not known or reasonably foreseeable by the
OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of
directors on the date of the merger agreement, if the failure to
withdraw, modify or amend the recommendation would be reasonably
likely to result in a breach of their fiduciary duties under
applicable law; however, DryShips must be given at least five
business days prior written notice by OceanFreight and, if
requested by DryShips, OceanFreight will engage in good faith
negotiations with DryShips during such five business day period
to amend the agreement in such a manner that obviates the need
for a withdrawal of the recommendation in favor of the proposed
merger.
|
In addition, prior to August 23, 2011, OceanFreight had the
right to terminate the merger agreement to enter into a
definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal or make
an adverse recommendation in connection with a superior proposal
if the superior proposal did not result from a breach of the
non-solicitation provisions of the merger agreement, and the
OceanFreight Special Committee reasonably determined in good
faith after consultation with its outside counsel and financial
advisors that the failure to take any such action would have
breached its fiduciary duty to OceanFreight shareholders,
provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight provided at least five business days written notice
to DryShips prior to any such action, which notice would have
had to satisfy certain requirements;
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight attached a copy of the current version of the
proposed agreement relating to the superior proposal and
disclosed the identity of the party making the superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
if requested by DryShips, OceanFreight would have been obligated
to enter into good faith negotiations with DryShips during such
five business day period to amend the merger agreement so that
the superior proposal ceased to constitute a superior
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
following the five business days notice to DryShips, the
OceanFreight Special Committee determined in good faith, taking
into account any changes to the DryShips/OceanFreight merger
agreement proposed by DryShips, that the superior proposal
continued to be a superior proposal. OceanFreight would have
been required to provide a new written notice period of five
business days to DryShips in the event of any financial or other
material amendment to the superior proposal.
|
A superior proposal means a bona fide, unsolicited
written acquisition proposal to acquire all of
OceanFreights assets or common stock that:
|
|
|
|
|
is not subject to any financing condition and for which
financing has been fully committed or is on hand or the
OceanFreight Special Committee determines in good faith after
considering the advice of its financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation is reasonably capable of being fully
financed;
|
|
|
|
the OceanFreight Special Committee determines in good faith by a
majority vote, after consultation with its outside counsel and
its financial advisor, is reasonably likely to be consummated in
accordance with its terms, taking into account all aspects of
the proposal and the identity of the person making the
acquisition proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the OceanFreight Special Committee determines in good faith by a
majority vote, after considering the advice of its financial
advisor, would result in a transaction more financially
favorable to OceanFreights shareholders than the merger
contemplated by the merger agreement (after taking into account
any amendment of the merger agreement or proposed increase to
the merger consideration proposed by DryShips).
|
The OceanFreight Special Committee and the OceanFreight board of
directors are not prohibited from complying with
Rule 14e-2(a)
under the Exchange Act, consistent with the requirements set
forth above, or issuing a stop, look and listen
disclosure of the type contemplated by
Rule 14d-9(f)
under the Exchange Act.
82
OceanFreight and the OceanFreight board of directors shall not
take any of the actions described in the exceptions to the
non-solicitation provisions described above unless OceanFreight:
|
|
|
|
|
first notifies DryShips promptly (but in no event later than
24 hours) after receipt by OceanFreight (or any of its
representatives) of any third-party acquisition proposal,
including the material terms and conditions thereof and the
identity of the person making such acquisition proposal and its
proposed financing sources, and shall keep DryShips reasonably
informed on a prompt basis (but in any event no later than
24 hours) as to the status (including changes or proposed
changes to the material terms) of such acquisition
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
notifies DryShips promptly (but in no event later than
24 hours) after receipt by OceanFreight of any request for
non-public information relating to OceanFreight or any of its
subsidiaries or for access to the business, properties, assets,
books or records of OceanFreight or any of its subsidiaries by
any third party that has informed OceanFreight that it is
considering making, or has made, an acquisition proposal.
|
Litigation
OceanFreight will promptly advise DryShips of any litigation,
claim, action, suit, hearing, proceeding, arbitration, audit,
inspection or other investigation involving OceanFreight or any
of its officers or directors, or the OceanFreight Special
Committee, relating to the merger agreement or the purchase
agreement or the transactions contemplated thereunder and will
keep DryShips informed and consult with DryShips regarding the
status of any litigation, claim, action, suit, hearing,
proceeding, arbitration, audit, inspection or other
investigation on an ongoing basis. OceanFreight will cooperate
with and give DryShips the opportunity to consult with respect
to any defense or settlement relating thereto, and such
settlement will not be agreed to without the prior written
consent of DryShips.
DryShips will promptly advise OceanFreight of any litigation,
claim, action, suit, hearing, proceeding, arbitration, audit,
inspection or other investigation involving DryShips or Ocean
Rig or any of its officers or directors, relating to the merger
agreement or the purchase agreement or the transactions
thereunder and will keep OceanFreight informed and consult with
OceanFreight regarding the status of any litigation, claim,
action, suit, hearing, proceeding, arbitration, audit,
inspection or other investigation on an ongoing basis. DryShips
will cooperate with and give OceanFreight the opportunity to
consult with respect to the defense or settlement relating
thereto.
Employee
and Director Matters
Prior to the closing of the merger, DryShips will use reasonable
efforts to enter into employment agreements, effective as of the
closing of the merger, with Demetris Nenes and Solon Dracoulis
in form and substance acceptable to DryShips and those employees.
Immediately prior to the closing of the merger, OceanFreight
will pay all employment-related payments due in connection with,
or as a result of, the closing of the merger. If the closing of
the merger occurs prior to December 31, 2011, OceanFreight
shall pay directors fees for the directors of OceanFreight
through December 31, 2011.
Ocean Rig
Common Stock
DryShips shall cause the shares of Ocean Rig common stock that
are to be delivered to the holders of OceanFreight common stock
pursuant to the surrender and payment provisions under the
merger agreement to be free of any mortgage, lien, pledge,
hypothecation, charge, security interest, infringement,
interference, right of first refusal, right of first offer,
preemptive right, option, community property right or other
adverse claim or encumbrance and restrictions on transfer,
except those imposed by applicable law, and preemptive rights at
the time of such delivery.
Covenants
of DryShips
Obligations
of Pelican Stockholdings Inc.
DryShips has agreed that it will take all necessary action to
cause its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pelican Stockholdings Inc.,
to perform its obligations under the merger agreement.
83
Voting
of DryShips Shares
DryShips has agreed that it will cause all shares of
OceanFreight common stock owned beneficially or of record by it,
Pelican Stockholdings Inc. or any of DryShips other
subsidiaries to be voted in favor of adopting the merger
agreement. Prior to the effective time of the merger, DryShips
will not vote any such shares in favor of the removal of any
OceanFreight director or in favor of the election of any
director not approved by the OceanFreight Special Committee.
Indemnification
and Director and Officer Liability
DryShips has agreed that it will cause OceanFreight, and
OceanFreight has agreed that:
|
|
|
|
|
for six years after the effective time of the merger,
OceanFreight will indemnify and hold harmless the present and
former officers and directors of OceanFreight and its
subsidiaries in respect of acts or omissions in their capacities
as officers or directors prior to the effective time of the
merger to the fullest extent permitted by the MIBCA or any other
applicable law or provided under OceanFreights articles of
incorporation and bylaws in effect on the date of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
for six years after the effective date of the merger, DryShips
will maintain provisions in the articles of incorporation and
bylaws of OceanFreight or any successor regarding elimination of
liability of directors, indemnification and advancement of
expenses that are no less advantageous to the intended
beneficiaries than the provisions existing on the date of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
prior to the effective time of the merger, OceanFreight will
obtain and fully pay the premium for the non-cancellable
extension of directors and officers insurance
policies and OceanFreights existing fiduciary liability
insurance policies for a discovery period of at least six years
for claims relating to any time before the effective time of the
merger, or, OceanFreight shall, and DryShips shall cause
OceanFreight to, maintain OceanFreights existing cover or
equivalent cover for at least six years, subject to a cap on the
cost of such cover;
|
|
|
|
if DryShips, OceanFreight or any of its successors or assigns
consolidates or merges into any other entity or transfers or
conveys substantially all its properties and assets, the
surviving entity will assume the directors and officers
liability provisions laid out in the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the rights of any indemnified person will survive consummation
of the merger and will be enforceable by each indemnified person.
|
Stock
Exchange Listing
DryShips will use its reasonable best efforts to cause Ocean Rig
to take all necessary actions under applicable laws and the
rules of NASDAQ to ensure that the shares of Ocean Rig common
stock comprising the merger consideration are listed on NASDAQ
prior to or as of the effective time of the merger.
Covenants
of DryShips and OceanFreight
DryShips and OceanFreight have agreed that:
|
|
|
|
|
as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the merger
agreement, DryShips and OceanFreight shall prepare, and DryShips
shall cause Ocean Rig to file with the SEC, a registration
statement on
Form F-4
to register under the Securities Act the shares of Ocean Rig
common stock to be distributed in the merger, which will include
a prospectus with respect to the shares of Ocean Rig common
stock and a proxy statement to be sent to OceanFreights
shareholders relating to the OceanFreight shareholders
meeting;
|
|
|
|
they will cooperate in the processing of the
Form F-4
in order to cause the
Form F-4
to be declared and remain effective under the Securities Act and
comply with other applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
if prior to the effective time of the merger, any event or
change occurs that requires an amendment or supplement to the
Form F-4,
they will inform the other thereof and cooperate in the filing
of any amendment
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
to the F-4 or the proxy statement required by law, and, if
required disseminate such information to OceanFreights
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the merger
agreement, OceanFreight will give notice of, convene and hold a
shareholders meeting to seek approval of the merger
agreement, which approval shall be recommended by the
OceanFreight Special Committee and the OceanFreight board of
directors, except as set forth above, and which meeting shall be
held, even if an adverse recommendation has been made;
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight and DryShips will use reasonable best efforts to
take all actions necessary, proper or advisable under applicable
law to consummate the merger including promptly preparing and
filing any required documentation and obtaining and maintaining
all approvals, consents, registrations, permits authorization
and other required confirmations. However, DryShips, Pelican
Stockholdings Inc. and OceanFreight will not be required,
without DryShips prior written consent, to consent to any
sale or disposal of, or material restriction on, any material
portion of the assets or business of the business of DryShips,
OceanFreight, Pelican Stockholdings Inc. or any of their
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
DryShips and OceanFreight will consult with each other before
making any press release or communication with the press or
public;
|
|
|
|
at and after the effective time of the merger,
OceanFreights officers and directors will be authorized to
execute and deliver on behalf of OceanFreight and Pelican
Stockholdings Inc. any required deeds, bills of sale,
assignments or assurances, and to take any actions to vest,
perfect or confirm of record any and all right, title and
interest in, to and under any of the rights, properties or
assets of OceanFreight acquired as a result of or in connection
with the merger;
|
|
|
|
prior to the effective time of the merger, OceanFreight will
cooperate with DryShips and use reasonable best efforts to
enable the de-listing of OceanFreight common stock from the
NASDAQ Global Market and deregistration of OceanFreight common
stock under the Exchange Act as promptly as practicable, and not
more than ten days after the effective time of merger;
|
|
|
|
DryShips, OceanFreight and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. will each
use reasonable best efforts to grant any approvals and take any
actions reasonably necessary with relation to any antitakeover
or similar statute or antitakeover provisions of their articles
of incorporation or bylaws so that the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement may be consummated as promptly as
practicable; and
|
|
|
|
DryShips and OceanFreight will promptly notify each other of any
notice relating to (i) alleged consent required,
(ii) any governmental notice or communication,
(iii) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or
proceedings affecting or relating to OceanFreight, DryShips, or
any of either of their respective subsidiaries, if notification
would have been required pursuant to the merger agreement,
(iv) any inaccuracy of any representation or warranty
contained in the merger agreement that could reasonably be
expected to cause closing of the merger not to occur, and
(v) any failure of DryShips or OceanFreight to comply with
any covenant, condition or agreement under the merger agreement.
|
Conditions
to the Merger
Each partys obligation to complete the merger is subject
to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement shall have been approved by a majority of
the outstanding OceanFreight common stock in accordance with the
MIBCA;
|
|
|
|
no law, rule or regulation or any order, injunction, judgment,
decree or similar requirement of any governmental authority to
which any of the parties or by which any of the parties is
subject or bound preventing or prohibiting the consummation of
the merger shall be in effect;
|
|
|
|
the
Form F-4
registration statement as to which this proxy
statement / prospectus forms a part shall have become
effective under the Securities Act and shall not be the subject
of any stop order suspending or seeking to suspend the
effectiveness of the statement; provided this condition need not
be satisfied after 5:30 p.m. New York time on
January 26, 2012; and
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
the shares of Ocean Rig common stock included in the merger
consideration shall have been approved for listing on NASDAQ,
subject to the completion of the merger; provided this condition
need not be satisfied after 5:30 p.m. New York time on
January 26, 2012.
|
The obligations of OceanFreight to effect the merger are also
subject to the satisfaction by DryShips of the following
conditions (as of the purchase agreement closing date, the
merger closing date,
and/or a
specified date as set forth in the representation and warranty):
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of DryShips set forth in the
merger agreement regarding organization and existence and
authority to enter into the agreement being true and correct in
all material respects (disregarding materiality and material
adverse effect qualifications relating to DryShips and Ocean
Rig); the representations and warranties of DryShips regarding
capitalization of Ocean Rig set forth in the merger agreement
shall be true and correct; and the other representations and
warranties of DryShips set forth in the merger agreement or any
other writing delivered by DryShips pursuant to the merger
agreement shall be true and correct (disregarding materiality
and material adverse effect qualifications relating to DryShips
and Ocean Rig), except as, individually or in the aggregate, has
not had or would not reasonably be expected to result in a
material adverse effect of DryShips or Ocean Rig;
|
|
|
|
the performance by DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. in
all material respects of the obligations required to be
performed by them under the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
since the date of the merger agreement, there shall not have
been any event, change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or
state of facts that, individually or in the aggregate, has had
or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on DryShips or Ocean Rig; and
|
|
|
|
DryShips shall have delivered to OceanFreight a certificate,
executed by an executive officer of DryShips to the effect that
the conditions set out above have been satisfied.
|
The obligations of DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. to
effect the merger are also subject to the satisfaction by
OceanFreight of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
as of the earlier of the purchase agreement closing date, which
occurred on August 24, 2011, or the merger closing date, or
as of a specified date set forth in the representation and
warranty, the representations and warranties of OceanFreight set
forth in the merger agreement regarding organization, existence
and authority to enter into the agreement, and non-compete
arrangements being true and correct in all material respects
(disregarding materiality and material adverse effect
qualifications relating to OceanFreight); the representations
and warranties of OceanFreight set forth in the merger agreement
regarding capitalization being true and correct, and the other
representations and warranties of OceanFreight set forth in the
merger agreement or other writing delivered by OceanFreight
pursuant to the merger agreement (disregarding materiality and
OceanFreight material adverse effect qualifications) shall be
true and correct, except where, individually or in the
aggregate, it would not reasonably be expected to have an
OceanFreight material adverse effect, and the receipt of an
officers certificate to that effect;
|
|
|
|
the performance by OceanFreight in all material respects of the
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement, and the receipt of an officers certificate to
that effect;
|
|
|
|
as of the earlier of the purchase agreement closing date, which
occurred on August 24, 2011, or the merger closing date, or
as of a specified date set forth in the representation and
warranty, there shall not have been any event, change,
circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of facts that,
individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on
OceanFreight; and
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight shall have delivered to DryShips a certificate,
executed by an executive officer of OceanFreight to the effect
that the conditions set out above have been satisfied.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the closing of the purchase
agreement occurs prior to the merger, as it did, the only
condition OceanFreight will be required to satisfy is
OceanFreights performance in all material respects of the
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement, and the delivery of an officers certificate to
that effect.
86
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger, notwithstanding the approval of
the merger agreement by the OceanFreight shareholders (provided
that a majority vote of the OceanFreight Special Committee shall
be necessary for termination by OceanFreight and the
OceanFreight Special Committee may prosecute any action related
to the merger agreement and the purchase agreement on behalf of
OceanFreight):
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written agreement of OceanFreight and DryShips;
|
|
|
|
by either OceanFreight or DryShips, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effective time of merger shall not have occurred on or
before March 26, 2012; or
|
|
|
|
there shall be any applicable law that prohibits OceanFreight,
DryShips, or Pelican Stockholdings Inc. from consummating the
merger and such prohibition shall have become final and
nonappealable;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by OceanFreight, if DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc.
shall have breached or failed to perform any of their respective
covenants or obligations required to be performed by each of
them under the merger agreement, if any representation or
warranty of DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. shall have
become untrue or if any other event, change, circumstance,
occurrence, effect or state of facts shall have occurred, in
each case which breach or failure to perform or to be true or
event, change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of
facts, individually or in the aggregate, has resulted or would
reasonably be expected to result in material breach by DryShips,
and such material breach by DryShips cannot be or, to the extent
curable by DryShips or Pelican Stockholdings Inc., has not been
cured by the earlier of March 26, 2012, and twenty days
after giving written notice to DryShips of such breach or
failure;
|
|
|
|
by OceanFreight, prior to August 23, 2011, in relation to a
superior proposal (in accordance with the requirements set out
above), provided that OceanFreight paid to DryShips the
termination fee described below, and immediately following
termination of the merger agreement OceanFreight entered into a
definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
by DryShips:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if OceanFreight shall have breached or failed to perform any of
its covenants or obligations required under the merger agreement
(other than the covenants or obligations relating to the
prohibition on solicitation which are addressed above) which
breach or failure to perform, individually or in the aggregate
has resulted or would reasonably be expected to result in a
material breach of covenant by OceanFreight, which cannot be or,
to the extent curable by OceanFreight, has not been cured by the
earlier of March 26, 2012 and twenty days after giving
written notice to OceanFreight of such breach or failure; or
|
|
|
|
On or prior to the purchase agreement closing date, which
occurred on August 24, 2011, if any representation or
warranty of OceanFreight became untrue or if any other event,
change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of facts
occurred, in each case which failure to be true or any event,
change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of facts,
individually or in the aggregate, had resulted in or had
reasonably been expected to result in the failure of a condition
to DryShips obligation to close; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
by DryShips prior to the purchase agreement closing date, which
occurred on August 24, 2011, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the OceanFreight Special Committee made an adverse
recommendation in respect of the merger;
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight entered into a binding agreement (other than a
confidentiality agreement contemplated by the merger agreement)
with a third party relating to any acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
the OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight board of
directors failed publicly to reaffirm its recommendation of the
merger agreement or the merger within five business days of
receipt of a written request by DryShips or Pelican
Stockholdings Inc. to provide such reaffirmation following an
acquisition proposal from a third party; or
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight or any of its representatives materially breached
any of its obligations under the non-solicitation provisions
under the merger agreement.
|
87
The party desiring to terminate the merger agreement as
described above shall give written notice of such termination to
the other party.
Effect of
Termination
If the merger agreement is terminated as described above, the
merger agreement shall become void and of no effect without
liability of any party (or any shareholder, director, officer,
employee, agent, consultant or representative of such party),
except that certain provisions of the merger agreement
(including the provision for a termination fee) will remain in
full force and effect and if the termination shall result from
the intentional breach (meaning a material breach that is a
consequence of an act undertaken by the breaching party with the
intention of breaching the applicable obligation), such party
shall be fully liable for any and all liabilities and damages
incurred or suffered by the other party as a result of such
failure.
Termination
Fee and Expenses
If (i) the merger agreement is terminated by DryShips as a
result of a material breach by OceanFreight of its covenants or
obligations, (ii) an acquisition proposal to acquire at
least 45% of the assets or common stock of OceanFreight is made
prior to termination of the merger agreement, and
(iii) prior to the first anniversary of the date of
termination, OceanFreight enters into a definitive agreement
with respect to or recommends to its shareholders any
acquisition proposal involving 45% or more of the assets or
common stock of OceanFreight or any such acquisition proposal
shall have been consummated, then OceanFreight will be required
to pay a termination fee of $4.5 million to DryShips in
immediately available funds within two business days after the
occurrence of the last of the events described in this paragraph.
Additionally, a termination fee would have been payable in two
additional circumstances that are no longer applicable. First,
if the merger agreement was terminated by DryShips prior to the
closing of the purchase agreement, which occurred on
August 24, 2011, and pursuant to the merger agreement in
the event that (i) prior to the purchase agreement closing
date, the OceanFreight Special Committee or the OceanFreight
board of directors made an adverse recommendation,
(ii) OceanFreight entered into a binding agreement (other
than a confidentiality agreement contemplated by the merger
agreement) relating to any third-party acquisition proposal,
(iii) the OceanFreight Special Committee or the
OceanFreight board of directors failed publicly to reaffirm its
recommendation of the merger agreement or the transaction
contemplated thereby within five business days of receipt of a
written request by DryShips or Pelican Stockholdings Inc. to
provide such a reaffirmation following any third-party
acquisition proposal, or (iv) OceanFreight or any of its
representatives materially breached any of its obligations
relating to the prohibition on solicitation under the merger
agreement, then OceanFreight would have been required to pay to
DryShips in immediately available funds a termination fee of
$4.5 million in cash within two business days after such
termination.
Second, if the merger agreement was terminated by OceanFreight
prior to August 23, 2011 after receipt of a superior
proposal (and in accordance with the provisions set out above),
then OceanFreight would have been required to pay to DryShips in
immediately available funds a termination fee of
$4.5 million in cash at the time of such termination.
OceanFreight acknowledges that the provisions relating to a
termination fee are an integral part of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and that, without these
termination fee provisions, DryShips would not have entered into
the merger agreement. Accordingly, if OceanFreight fails
promptly to pay any amount due to DryShips pursuant to the
merger agreement, it shall also pay any costs and expenses
incurred by DryShips or Pelican Stockholdings Inc. in connection
with a legal action to enforce the merger agreement that results
in a judgment against OceanFreight for such amount, together
with interest on the amount of any unpaid fee, cost or expense
at the publicly announced prime rate of Citibank, N.A. from the
date such fee, cost or expense was required to be paid to (but
excluding) the payment date.
DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. agree that, upon any
termination of the merger agreement under circumstances where
the termination fee is payable by OceanFreight pursuant to the
merger agreement and such termination fee is paid in full,
DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. shall be precluded from
any other remedy against OceanFreight, at law or in equity or
otherwise, and neither DryShips nor Pelican Stockholdings Inc.
shall seek to obtain any recovery, judgment, or damages of any
kind, including consequential, indirect, or punitive
88
damages, against OceanFreight or any of OceanFreights
subsidiaries or any of their respective directors, officers,
employees, partners, managers, members, shareholders or
affiliates or their respective representatives in connection
with the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated
thereby.
Specific
Performance
The parties to the merger agreement agree that irreparable
damage would occur if any provision of the merger agreement were
not performed in accordance with the terms provided and that the
parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of the merger agreement or to enforce
specifically the performance of the terms and provisions in any
federal court located in the State of New York or any New York
state court, in addition to any other remedy to which they are
entitled at law or in equity.
Amendment
and Waiver
Any provision of the merger agreement may be amended or waived
prior to the effective time of the merger only if such amendment
or waiver is in writing and is signed, in the case of an
amendment, by each party to the merger agreement or, in the case
of a waiver, by each party against whom the waiver is to be
effective; provided that (i) any such amendment shall
require the approval of a majority of the OceanFreight Special
Committee and (ii) after approval of the merger by
OceanFreight shareholders, no amendment or waiver that would
require the further approval of the OceanFreight shareholders
under the MIBCA may be made without such further shareholder
approval.
No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power
or privilege under the merger agreement will operate as a waiver
thereof nor will any single or partial exercise thereof preclude
any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any
other right, power or privilege. The rights and remedies
provided under the merger agreement will be cumulative and not
exclusive of any rights or remedies provided by applicable law.
Governing
Law and Jurisdiction
The merger agreement is governed by New York law except to the
extent that the law of the Marshall Islands is mandatorily
applicable to the merger. The parties have consented to the
jurisdiction of certain federal and state courts sitting in New
York.
89
THE
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the
purchase agreement. The description may not contain all of the
information that may be important to you and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the purchase agreement, which is
included as Annex B to this document. Ocean Rig and
OceanFreight urge you to read the entire purchase agreement
carefully.
The purchase agreement contains representations and
warranties that each of DryShips, the Sellers (defined below)
and OceanFreight made as of specific dates. The assertions made
in those representations and warranties were made solely for
purposes of the contract among DryShips, the Sellers and
OceanFreight and may be subject to important qualifications and
limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with
negotiating the terms of the purchase agreement. In addition,
some of those representations and warranties may not be accurate
or complete as of any specified date, may be subject to a
contractual standard of materiality different from what might be
viewed as material to shareholders, or may have been used for
purposes of allocating risk between the respective parties
rather than establishing matters as facts. Shareholders and
other investors are not third-party beneficiaries under the
purchase agreement and should not rely on the representations,
warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as
characterizations of the actual state of facts or conditions of
DryShips, the Sellers or OceanFreight or any of their respective
subsidiaries or affiliates.
The
Purchase
On July 26, 2011, DryShips entered into a purchase
agreement with Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel Investments
Limited and Haywood Finance Limited, or collectively, the
Sellers (each of which is controlled by Mr. Kandylidis) and
OceanFreight, pursuant to which DryShips acquired approximately
50.5% of the shares of OceanFreight, or the Seller Shares.
Closing
The closing of the purchase and sale of the Seller Shares took
place on August 24, 2011.
Purchase
Consideration
The consideration paid by DryShips for each share of
OceanFreight owned by the Sellers consisted of
(x) $11.25 in cash and (y) 0.52326 shares of
Ocean Rig common stock (with cash paid in lieu of fractional
shares). If the merger converts into an all-cash transaction
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the Sellers or
their designees will be entitled to require DryShips to purchase
the shares of Ocean Rig common stock that the Sellers or their
designees received pursuant to the purchase agreement for a
price of $21.50 per share of Ocean Rig common stock in cash, and
DryShips will have a reciprocal right to acquire those shares at
the same price.
Voting
Agreement; Irrevocable Proxy
For the term of the purchase agreement, each of the Sellers had
agreed that at any shareholder meeting it would vote (or cause
to be voted) all of its Seller Shares in favor of the approval
and adoption of the merger agreement and the merger, and only as
directed by DryShips with respect to any action that would
reasonably be expected to (i) frustrate the purposes of the
purchase or sale or the merger or any other transactions
contemplated by the purchase agreement and the merger agreement,
(ii) breach any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement in the purchase agreement or the merger agreement or
result in any of their conditions not being satisfied,
(iii) result in any extraordinary transaction involving
OceanFreight (other than the merger) or (iv) result in
certain changes of the business, management or the board of
directors of OceanFreight. Each of the Sellers had further
appointed DryShips as attorney-in-fact and proxy for and on
behalf of such Seller, to attend any and all shareholder
meetings and vote in accordance with the voting agreement.
90
Representations
and Warranties
DryShips made customary representations and warranties to the
Sellers. DryShips representations and warranties in the
purchase agreement relate to:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization, due authorization to enter into,
deliver, and carry out the obligations under, the purchase
agreement and the enforceability of the purchase agreement;
|
|
|
|
valid issuance and freedom from liens, encumbrances and certain
restrictions on transfer of the Ocean Rig common stock that was
delivered to the Sellers;
|
|
|
|
absence of any claims for fees, commissions or compensation
against the Sellers as a result of the purchase and sale;
|
|
|
|
non-contravention, as a result of the execution of the purchase
agreement or implementation of the transactions contemplated
thereby, of laws, regulations or orders to which DryShips is
subject, or of contracts or other arrangements by which DryShips
is bound; and
|
|
|
|
sophistication of DryShips as an investor and certain
representations relating to compliance with the federal
securities laws.
|
The Sellers also made customary representations and warranties
to DryShips. The Sellers representations and warranties in
the purchase agreement relate to:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization and due authorization to enter into,
deliver, and carry out the obligations under, the purchase
agreement, and the enforceability of the purchase agreement;
|
|
|
|
Mr. Kandylidis status as the controlling shareholder
of each Seller, and each Sellers ownership of the Seller
Shares free from liens and encumbrances and with the ability to
deliver the Seller Shares with good title and free from liens
and encumbrances;
|
|
|
|
non-ownership of OceanFreight common stock (other than the
Seller Shares), options, warrants or other rights to acquire
OceanFreight common stock;
|
|
|
|
non-contravention, as a result of the execution of the purchase
agreement or implementation of the transactions contemplated
thereby, of laws, regulations or orders to which the Sellers or
Mr. Kandylidis are subject, or of contracts or other
arrangements by which the Sellers or Mr. Kandylidis are
bound;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain restrictions on, or prerequisites to,
transfer of the Seller Shares;
|
|
|
|
absence of claims for fees, commissions or compensation against
DryShips as a result of the purchase and sale, except as
described below under fees and expenses; and
|
|
|
|
sophistication of the Sellers as investors and certain
representations relating to compliance with the federal
securities laws.
|
OceanFreight also made certain representations and warranties to
DryShips in the purchase agreement. Specifically, OceanFreight
represented and warranted that it had irrevocably taken all
actions required to:
|
|
|
|
|
exempt the transactions contemplated by the purchase agreement
from all anti-takeover laws and provisions in the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws;
|
|
|
|
avoid distribution and exercise of rights under
OceanFreights rights plan; and
|
|
|
|
vest all of the Seller Shares and eliminate restrictions on
their transfer.
|
Covenants
The purchase agreement contains certain covenants, including
covenants relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
refraining from certain actions that are inconsistent with the
purchase agreement or the merger agreement, and taking of
certain actions to implement the same;
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
public announcements;
|
|
|
|
notification to DryShips in the case of acquisition by the
Sellers of new shares of OceanFreight;
|
|
|
|
absence of any obligation to disclose material non-public
information;
|
|
|
|
six-month restriction on post-acquisition transfer, or lock up,
for the Ocean Rig shares acquired in the transaction by the
Sellers or any of their assignees; and
|
|
|
|
undertaking of DryShips to cause Ocean Rig to provide customary
registration rights at the end of the
lock-up
period in the event that the shares are not readily transferable
on a basis exempt from registration under the
U.S. securities laws.
|
Non-Solicitation
Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Sellers agreed to cease
all existing discussions and negotiations with any person with
respect to any acquisition proposal with respect to OceanFreight
as described in The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation, or any offer, proposal or indication of
interest by a third party to purchase the Seller Shares. The
Sellers agreed that they would not, and would use their
reasonable best efforts to cause their officers, directors,
agents or representatives not to, solicit, initiate or knowingly
take any action to facilitate or encourage the submission of any
acquisition proposal with respect to OceanFreight or an offer,
proposal or indication of interest by a third party to purchase
the Seller Shares. The Sellers further agreed to notify the
OceanFreight Special Committee upon receipt of any such proposal
or upon receipt of a request for non-public information relating
to the Seller Shares or OceanFreight and its subsidiaries.
Waivers
Each of the Sellers has irrevocably waived rights, if any, of
dissenting shareholders in respect of the Seller Shares that may
arise with respect to the merger or the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
Conditions
to the Closing of the Purchase and Sale
Each partys obligation to complete the sale of shares was
subject to the satisfaction of the condition that no law, rule
or regulation or any order, injunction, judgment decree or
similar requirement of any governmental authority to which any
of the parties or by which any of the parties was subject or
bound, preventing or prohibiting the consummation of the
purchase and sale, was in effect.
The obligation of DryShips to consummate the purchase was also
subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the satisfaction of the conditions to the obligations of
DryShips and Pelican Stockholdings Inc. to consummate the merger
as set forth in the merger agreement (except that those
conditions that by their terms apply at the time the merger
becomes effective shall be measured as if they applied as of the
closing date of the purchase and sale, which occurred on
August 24, 2011). See The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Merger for a
description of the conditions that have to be satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the performance by the Sellers in all material respects of their
obligations required to be performed by them under the purchase
agreement at or prior to the closing date of the purchase and
sale, which occurred on August 24, 2011;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of the Sellers and
OceanFreight set forth in the purchase agreement being true and
correct in all material respects as of the date of the purchase
agreement and as of the closing date of the purchase and sale,
which occurred on August 24, 2011, except for
representations and warranties made as of a specified date which
are being measured only as of such specified date.
|
92
The obligation of the Sellers to consummate the sale was also
subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the satisfaction of the conditions to the obligations of
OceanFreight to consummate the merger set forth in the merger
agreement (except that those conditions that by their terms
apply at the effective time of the merger shall be measured as
if they applied as of the closing date of the purchase and sale,
which occurred on August 24, 2011). See The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Merger for a
description of the conditions that have to be satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the performance by DryShips in all material respects of its
obligations required to be performed by it under the purchase
agreement at or prior to the closing date of the purchase and
sale, which occurred on August 24, 2011;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of DryShips set forth in the
purchase agreement being true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of the purchase agreement and as of the
closing date of the purchase and sale, which occurred on
August 24, 2011, except for representations and warranties
made as of a specified date which are being measured only as of
such specified date.
|
Termination;
Effect of Termination
Prior to the closing date of the purchase and sale, which
occurred on August 24, 2011, DryShips and the Sellers had
the right to terminate the purchase agreement by mutual written
consent. The purchase agreement also would have terminated
automatically as of the earlier of the termination of the merger
agreement or the time the merger becomes effective.
If the purchase agreement had terminated, it would have become
void and neither party would have had any liability to the other
party, except that certain provisions of the purchase agreement
would have remained in full force and effect and no party would
have been released from any liabilities arising from its willful
breach of any provision of the purchase agreement.
Expenses;
Fees
The purchase agreement provides that all costs, fees and
expenses incurred in connection with the purchase agreement will
be paid by or on behalf of the party incurring such cost or
expense, except for legal fees and advisory fees up to an
aggregate maximum amount of $1,500,000 incurred in connection
with the purchase agreement by the Sellers, which will be paid
by OceanFreight upon consummation of the merger.
Assigns
Prior to the closing of the purchase and sale, which occurred on
August 24, 2011, each Seller had the right to designate up
to three persons to receive the purchase consideration in lieu
of such Seller. In order to transfer the share portion of the
purchase consideration to any such designee, the Seller was
required to comply with various restrictions under the
U.S. securities laws, including requirements relating to
the exemption from registration under Regulation S for
offshore transactions. Each of the Sellers designated an
affiliate, Skidrow Investments Limited, to receive that part of
the purchase consideration comprised of Ocean Rig common stock.
Governing
Law and Jurisdiction
The purchase agreement is governed by New York law except to the
extent that the law of the Republic of the Marshall Islands
mandatorily applies to the documents relating to the transfer of
the shares. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of certain
federal and state courts sitting in New York.
93
OCEAN RIG
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth Ocean Rigs cash position
and consolidated capitalization as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to:
|
(i) a net increase in bank debt, net of
financing fees, of $641.3 million as a result of:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
proceeds, less financing fees, of $308.2 million under the
Deutsche Bank credit facilities to fund construction costs of
the Ocean Rig Poseidon;
|
|
|
2.
|
the repayment of $57.0 million under Ocean Rigs
$1.04 billion credit facility and the repayment of
$16.7 million under the $800.0 million credit
facility; and
|
|
|
3.
|
The drawdown of $406.8 million under the Deutsche Bank
credit facilities to fund construction costs of the Ocean Rig
Mykonos;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the payment of $309.3 million to fund the final
construction costs of the Ocean Rig Poseidon;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
the payment of $305.7 million to fund the final
construction costs of the Ocean Rig Mykonos;
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) the payment of $4.7 million to fund the upgraded costs
to the Ocean Rig Mykonos; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
a net decrease in restricted cash of $53.7 million as a
result of:
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
the restriction of $8.9 million due to the restructuring of
the Deutsche Bank credit facilities; and
|
|
|
2.
|
the release of $62.6 million in cash collateral due to the
restructuring of the Deutsche Bank credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
191,744
|
|
|
$
|
267,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash(1)
|
|
$
|
220,192
|
|
|
$
|
166,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured bank debt, including current portion
|
|
|
1,622,537
|
|
|
|
2,263,833
|
|
9.5% senior unsecured notes
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Total debt(2)
|
|
$
|
2,122,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,763,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized (actual and as adjusted); 131,696,928 shares
issued and outstanding (actual and as adjusted)
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares
authorized (actual and as adjusted); 0 shares issued and
outstanding (actual and as adjusted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,467,301
|
|
|
|
3,467,301
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(57,103
|
)
|
|
|
(57,103
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(506,525
|
)
|
|
|
(506,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,904,990
|
|
|
|
2,904,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
5,027,527
|
|
|
$
|
5,668,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restricted cash represents bank deposits to be used to fund loan
installments coming due and minimum cash deposits required to be
maintained with certain banks under Ocean Rigs borrowing
arrangements. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $1.6 billion of secured and guaranteed debt and
$0.5 billion of unsecured debt as of June 30, 2011 and
$1.6 billion of secured and guaranteed debt and
$0.5 billion of unsecured debt, which is not guaranteed, as
of June 30, 2011, as so adjusted. As of June 30, 2011,
DryShips provided guarantees under the two Deutsche Bank credit
facilities. Ocean Rigs $1.04 billion credit facility
is guaranteed by certain of its subsidiaries. |
94
OCEAN RIG
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OCEAN RIGS
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of the financial condition and
results of operations of Ocean Rig and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries for the years and periods referenced below. You
should read this section together with the historical
consolidated financial statements, including the notes to those
historical consolidated financial statements, for those same
years and periods included in this document. All of the
consolidated financial statements included herein have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See
Results of Operations.
This proxy statement / prospectus contains
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
based on Ocean Rigs current expectations and observations.
Included among the factors that, in Ocean Rigs view, could
cause actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements contained in this proxy
statement / prospectus are those discussed in sections
entitled Risk Factors and Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
Ocean Rig is an international offshore drilling contractor
providing oilfield services and drilling vessels for offshore
oil and gas exploration, development and production drilling,
and specializing in the ultra-deepwater and harsh-environment
segment of the offshore drilling industry. Ocean Rig currently
owns and operates two modern, fifth generation ultra-deepwater
semi-submersible offshore drilling rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson
and the Eirik Raude, and four sixth generation,
advanced capability ultra-deepwater drillships, the Ocean Rig
Corcovado, which was delivered to Ocean Rig on
January 3, 2011, the Ocean Rig Olympia, which was
delivered to Ocean Rig on March 30, 2011, the Ocean Rig
Poseidon, which was delivered to Ocean Rig on July 28,
2011, and the Ocean Rig Mykonos, which was delivered to
Ocean Rig on September 30, 2011. Ocean Rig has newbuilding
contracts with Samsung for the construction of three seventh
generation, advanced capability ultra-deepwater drillships.
These newbuilding drillships are currently scheduled for
delivery in July 2013, September 2013 and November 2013,
respectively.
History
of Ocean Rig
Ocean Rig was formed under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands on December 10, 2007, under the name
Primelead Shareholders Inc. and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
DryShips.
Ocean Rigs predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, was incorporated on
September 26, 1996 under the laws of Norway and contracted
for the construction of its two operating drilling rigs, the
Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude. The shares of
Ocean Rig ASA traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange from January
1997 to July 2008.
In December 2007, Primelead Limited, Ocean Rigs
wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired approximately 30.4% of the
outstanding capital stock of Ocean Rig ASA from Cardiff, a
company controlled by the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of DryShips and Ocean Rig. After acquiring
more than 33% of Ocean Rig ASAs outstanding shares through
a series of transactions through April 2008, Ocean Rig launched
a mandatory offer for the remaining shares of Ocean Rig ASA at a
price of NOK45 per share, or $8.89 per share, as required by
Norwegian law. In May 2008, Ocean Rig concluded a guarantee
facility of NOK5.0 billion, or $974.5 million, and a
term loan facility of $800 million, which Ocean Rig refers
to collectively as the Acquisition Facility, in order to
guarantee the purchase price of the shares of Ocean Rig ASA
acquired through the mandatory offer. Ocean Rig gained control
over Ocean Rig ASA on May 14, 2008. The results of
operations related to the acquisition are included in Ocean
Rigs consolidated financial statements as of May 15,
2008. As of July 10, 2008, Ocean Rig held 100% of the
shares of Ocean Rig ASA, or 163.6 million shares, which it
acquired at a total cost of $1.4 billion.
With respect to the acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA, discussed
above, DryShips purchased 4.4% of the share capital of Ocean Rig
ASA from companies affiliated with its Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer. In March 2009, DryShips contributed to
Ocean Rig all of its equity interests in the newbuilding
vessel-owning companies of the Ocean Rig Poseidon and
Ocean Rig Mykonos. In May 2009, Ocean Rig acquired the
equity interests of Drillships Holdings Inc., the owner of the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia,
from third parties and entities affiliated with Ocean Rigs
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and, in
exchange, Ocean Rig issued to the sellers common shares equal to
25% of its total issued and outstanding common shares as of
95
May 15, 2009. In connection with the acquisition the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia,
Ocean Rig incurred debt obligations of $230.0 million,
which have been repaid in full. In July 2009, DryShips acquired
the remaining 25% of its total issued and outstanding capital
stock from the minority interests held by third parties and
entities controlled by Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer for a $50.0 million cash payment
and the issuance of DryShips Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock with an aggregate face value of $280.0 million,
following which Ocean Rig became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
DryShips.
On December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig completed the sale of an
aggregate of 28,571,428 of its common shares (representing
approximately 22% of Ocean Rigs outstanding common stock)
in the private offering. A company controlled by Ocean
Rigs Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. George Economou, purchased 2,869,428 shares, or 2.38%
of Ocean Rigs outstanding common stock, in the private
offering at the offering price of $17.50 per share. Ocean Rig
received approximately $488.3 million of net proceeds from
the private offering, of which Ocean Rig used $99.0 million
to purchase an option contract from DryShips, its parent
company, for the construction of up to four ultra-deepwater
drillships, as discussed below. Ocean Rig applied the remaining
proceeds to partially fund remaining installment payments for
its newbuilding drillships and for general corporate purposes.
Following the completion of Ocean Rigs private offering on
December 21, 2010, DryShips owned approximately 78% of
Ocean Rigs outstanding common stock. As of the date of
this proxy statement / prospectus, DryShips owns approximately
75% of Ocean Rigs outstanding common stock.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig completed the issuance of
$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of
9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016 offered in a private
placement. The net proceeds from the notes offering of
approximately $487.5 million are expected to be used to
finance Ocean Rigs newbuilding drillships program and for
general corporate purposes. See Business
Description of Indebtedness.
Drilling
Rigs
Ocean Rig drilling rigs are marketed for offshore exploration
and development drilling programs worldwide, with particular
focus on drilling operations in ultra-deepwater and harsh
environments. The Leiv Eiriksson, delivered in 2001, has
a water depth drilling capacity of 7,500 feet. Since 2001,
it has drilled 35 deepwater and ultra-deepwater wells in a
variety of locations, including Angola, Congo, Norway, the U.K.
and Ireland in addition to five shallow-water wells. In October
2009, the Leiv Eiriksson completed the Shell contract. In
April 2009, the Leiv Eiriksson entered into a three-year
contract with Petrobras Oil & Gas for drilling
operations in the Black Sea, offshore of Turkey, which was
originally scheduled to expire in October 2012, but pursuant to
an agreement with Petrobras Oil & Gas, the contract
terminated on April 10, 2011.
The Eirik Raude, delivered in 2002, has a water depth
drilling capacity of 10,000 feet. Since 2002, it has
drilled 47 deepwater and ultra-deepwater wells in countries such
as Canada, Ghana, Norway and the U.K., and the Gulf of Mexico,
in addition to six shallow-water wells. In October 2008, the
Eirik Raude commenced a three-year contract with Tullow
Oil. The contract is scheduled to expire in October 2011. On
October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into drilling contracts
for the Eirik Raude for three additional wells offshore
of West Africa, with two independent oil operators based in the
United Kingdom and the United States. The total revenue backlog,
excluding mobilization cost, to complete the three wells program
is estimated at $96 million for a period of approximately
175 days. The new contracts are expected to commence after
completion of the existing Tullow Oil contract around
mid-October.
Drillships
Ocean Rig took delivery of the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos, its four sixth generation, advanced
capability ultra-deepwater drillships on January 3, 2011,
March 30, 2011, July 28, 2011 and September 30,
2011, respectively. In addition, Ocean Rig has entered into
contracts with Samsung for the construction of three seventh
generation advanced capability ultra-deepwater drillships, Ocean
Rigs seventh generation hulls, which are scheduled for
delivery in July 2013, September 2013 and November 2013,
respectively.
96
Ocean Rig drillships are sister-ships constructed by
the same shipyard to the same or similar design and
specifications. Ocean Rig has secured employment for the
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos but
not for its seventh generation hulls.
The total cost of construction and construction-related expenses
for the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia,
the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
amounted to approximately $755.7 million,
$756.9 million, $791.8 million and
$784.4 million, respectively. Construction-related expenses
include equipment purchases, commissioning, supervision and
commissions to related parties, excluding financing costs and
fair value adjustments. As of September 30, 2011, Ocean Rig
had made an aggregate of $726.7 million of construction and
construction-related payments for its three seventh generation
hulls and has remaining total construction and
construction-related payments relating to these drillships of
approximately $1.2 billion in the aggregate.
On November 22, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into a contract with Samsung that granted
DryShips options for the construction of up to four additional
ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos with certain upgrades to vessel design
and specifications. The option agreement was novated by DryShips
to Ocean Rig on December 30, 2010, at a cost of
$99.0 million, which Ocean Rig paid from the net proceeds
of a private offering of its common shares that Ocean Rig
completed in December 2010. In addition, Ocean Rig paid
additional deposits totaling $20.0 million to Samsung in
the first quarter of 2011 to maintain favorable costs and yard
slot timing under the option contract.
On May 16, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an addendum to the
option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which Samsung granted
Ocean Rig the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to its drillships and its seventh
generation hulls, with certain upgrades to vessel design and
specifications. Ocean Rig did not pay slot reservation fees in
connection with its entry into this addendum.
As of the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
Ocean Rig has exercised three of the six options and, as a
result, has entered into shipbuilding contracts for its three
seventh generation hulls with deliveries scheduled in July 2013,
September 2013 and November 2013, respectively. Ocean Rig has
made payments of $632.4 million to the shipyard in the
second quarter of 2011 in connection with its exercise of the
three newbuilding drillship options. The estimated total project
cost per drillship is $638.0 million, which consists of
$570.0 million of construction costs, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses of
$30.0 million. These upgrades include a 7 ram BOP, a dual
mud system and, with the purchase of additional equipment, the
capability to drill up to 12,000 feet water depth.
Ocean Rig may exercise its three newbuilding drillship options
at any time on or prior to January 31, 2012, with vessel
deliveries ranging from the first to the third quarter of 2014,
depending on when the options are exercised. Ocean Rig estimates
the total project cost, excluding financing costs, for the
remaining three optional drillships to be $638.0 million
per drillship, based on the construction and
construction-related expenses for its seventh generation hulls
described above.
As part of the novation of the contract described above, the
benefit of the slot reservation fees passed to Ocean Rig. The
amount of the slot reservation fees for its seventh generation
hulls has been applied towards the drillship contract prices and
the amount of the slot reservation fees applicable to one of the
remaining three newbuilding drillship options will be applied
towards the drillship contract price if the option is exercised.
Recent
Employment Contracts
On October 11, 2010, Ocean Rig entered into contracts with
Vanco for the Ocean Rig Olympia to drill a total of five
wells for exploration drilling offshore of Ghana and Cote
dIvoire at a maximum operating dayrate of $415,000 and a
daily mobilization rate of $180,000, plus fuel costs. The
drillship commenced the contracts upon its delivery on
March 31, 2011. The aggregate contract term is for
approximately one year, subject to Ocean Rigs
customers option to extend the term at the same dayrate
for (i) one additional well, (ii) one additional year,
or (iii) one additional well plus one additional year.
Vanco is required to exercise the option no later than the date
on which the second well in the five well program reaches its
target depth.
97
On December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig entered into an agreement
with Petrobras Oil & Gas pursuant to which the Leiv
Eiriksson was released from the Petrobras contract on
April 10, 2011 and, after its release, the rig commenced a
contract with Cairn, which is described below.
In connection with the agreement described above, Ocean Rig
entered into a
544-day
contract, plus a mobilization period, with Petrobras Tanzania
for the Ocean Rig Poseidon, which the drillship commenced
in July 2011, for drilling operations offshore of Tanzania and
West Africa at a maximum dayrate of $632,000, including a bonus
of up to $46,000. In addition, Ocean Rig is entitled to receive
a separate dayrate of $422,500 for up to 60 days during
relocation and a mobilization dayrate of $317,000, plus fuel
costs.
On January 3, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into a contract with
Cairn for the Leiv Eiriksson for drilling operations in
Greenland at a maximum operating dayrate of $560,000 and a
mobilization fee of $7.0 million, plus fuel costs. The
contract period will expire on October 31, 2011, subject to
Ocean Rigs customers option to extend the contract
period through November 30, 2011.
On January 3, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into and commenced a
contract of approximately ten months with Cairn for the Ocean
Rig Corcovado for drilling operations in Greenland at a
maximum operating dayrate of $560,000. In addition, Ocean Rig is
entitled to a mobilization fee of $17.0 million, plus fuel
costs and winterization upgrading costs of $12.0 million,
plus coverage of yard stay costs at $200,000 per day for the
winterization upgrade. The Ocean Rig Corcovado commenced
drilling and related operations under this contract in May 2011.
The contract period is scheduled to expire on October 31,
2011, subject to Ocean Rigs customers option to
extend the contract period through November 30, 2011.
On May 5, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into a contract with
Borders & Southern for the Leiv Eiriksson for
drilling operations offshore the Falkland Islands at a maximum
operating dayrate of $530,000, plus a $3.0 million fee
payable upon commencement of mobilization and mobilization and
demobilization fees, including fuel costs, of $15.4 million
and $12.6 million, respectively. The contract was
originally a two-well program at a maximum dayrate of $540,000,
but on May 19, 2011, Borders & Southern exercised
its option to extend the contract to drill an additional two
wells, which it assigned to Falkland Oil and Gas, and the
maximum dayrate decreased to $530,000. Borders &
Southern has the option to further extend this contract to drill
an additional fifth well, in which case the dayrate would
increase to $540,000. The estimated duration for the four-well
contract, including mobilization/demobilization periods, is
approximately 230 days, and Ocean Rig estimates that the
optional period to drill the additional fifth well would extend
the contract term by approximately 45 days. The Leiv
Eiriksson is scheduled to commence this contract in the
fourth quarter of 2011, following the expiration of its contract
with Cairn described above. This contract replaced the contract
Ocean Rig entered into with Borders & Southern for the
Eirik Raude on November 26, 2010, which was
terminated on May 5, 2011.
On July 20, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into contracts with
Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos for drilling operations offshore
Brazil. The term of each contract is 1,095 days, with a
total combined value of $1.1 billion. The contract for the
Ocean Rig Mykonos is scheduled to commence in the fourth
quarter of 2011, and the contract for the Ocean Rig Corcovado
is scheduled to commence upon the expiration of the
drillships current contract with Cairn.
Management
of Drilling Units
Ocean Rigs existing drilling rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson
and the Eirik Raude, are managed by Ocean Rig AS,
Ocean Rigs wholly-owned subsidiary. Ocean Rig AS also
provides supervisory management services including onshore
management, to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the Ocean Rig
Mykonos and its newbuilding drillships pursuant to separate
management agreements entered into with each of the
drillship-owning subsidiaries. Under the terms of these
management agreements, Ocean Rig AS, through its offices in
Stavanger, Norway, Aberdeen, United Kingdom and Houston,
Texas, is responsible for, among other things,
(i) assisting in construction contract technical
negotiations, (ii) securing contracts for the future
employment of the drillships, and (iii) providing
commercial, technical and operational management for the
drillships.
Pursuant to the Global Services Agreement between DryShips and
Cardiff, a related party, effective December 21, 2010,
DryShips has engaged Cardiff to act as consultant on matters of
chartering and sale and
98
purchase transactions for the offshore drilling units operated
by Ocean Rig. Under the Global Services Agreement, Cardiff, or
its subcontractor, will (i) provide consulting services
related to identifying, sourcing, negotiating and arranging new
employment for offshore assets of DryShips and its subsidiaries,
including Ocean Rigs drilling units; and
(ii) identify, source, negotiate and arrange the sale or
purchase of the offshore assets of DryShips and its
subsidiaries, including Ocean Rigs drilling units. In
consideration for such services, DryShips will pay to Cardiff a
fee of 1% in connection with employment arrangements and 0.75%
in connection with sale and purchase activities. The services
provided by Ocean Rig AS and Cardiff overlap mainly with respect
to negotiating shipyard orders and providing marketing for
potential contractors. Cardiff has an established reputation
within the shipping industry, and has developed expertise and a
network of strong relationships with shipbuilders and oil
companies, which supplement the management capabilities of Ocean
Rig AS. Ocean Rig does not pay or reimburse DryShips or its
affiliates for services provided under the Global Services
Agreement. Ocean Rig will, however, record expenses incurred
under the Global Services Agreement in its income statement and
as a shareholders contribution (additional paid-in
capital) to capital when they are incurred. See
Business Management of Ocean Rigs
Drilling Units Global Services Agreement.
Previously, Ocean Rig had management agreements with Cardiff
pursuant to which Cardiff provided supervisory services in
connection with the construction of the Ocean Rig Corcovado
and the Ocean Rig Olympia. These agreements were
terminated effective December 21, 2010. See
Management Fees to Related Party below.
Corporate
Structure
Please see the section of this proxy
statement / prospectus entitled
Business Corporate Structure.
Market
Overview
Ocean Rigs customers include oil super-majors and major
integrated oil and gas companies, state-owned national oil
companies and independent oil and gas companies. These customers
have experienced higher oil prices and significantly increased
revenues over the last decade. The increase has been related to
higher demand for oil and limited increases in available oil
production to offset the growth in demand. Over the same period,
the depletion rate for existing oil production has risen and
replacement rates for oil reserves have fallen for most oil
producers, highlighting the shortfall in exploration and
production spending to meet future demand and replace existing
reserves. In response to this development, oil producers,
particularly super-majors, majors and national oil companies,
have devoted more of their activities to identifying
replacements for existing production in new geographical areas
at increasing water depths. According to Fearnley Offshore AS,
this has translated into an increased focus on frontier
deepwater and ultra-deepwater areas, not only in existing
offshore regions such as Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico, Europe and
West Africa but also in India, Southeast Asia, China, East
Africa, Australasia and the Mediterranean. These developments
have resulted in a strong increase in demand for offshore
drilling services, resulting in materially increased dayrates
for drilling units. Dayrates increased from approximately
$180,000 in 2004 to above $600,000 in 2008, before declining to
a level of just above $410,000 in mid-2010 as a result of the
effects of the worldwide financial turmoil on the ultra-deep
water drilling market. Since then, the dayrates have increased
to approximately $453,000 in the current market.
Factors
Affecting Results of Operations
Ocean Rig charters its drilling units to customers primarily
pursuant to long-term drilling contracts. Under the drilling
contracts, the customer typically pays Ocean Rig a fixed daily
rate, depending on the activity and up-time of the drilling
unit. The customer bears all fuel costs and logistics costs
related to transport to and from the unit. Ocean Rig remains
responsible for paying the units operating expenses,
including the cost of crewing, catering, insuring, repairing and
maintaining the unit, the costs of spares and consumable stores
and other miscellaneous expenses.
Ocean Rig believes that the most important measures for
analyzing trends in the results of its operations consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Days: Ocean Rig defines
employment days as the total number of days the drilling units
are employed on a drilling contract.
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
Dayrates or maximum dayrates: Ocean Rig
defines drilling dayrates as the maximum rate in
U.S. Dollars possible to earn for drilling services for one
24 hour day at 100% efficiency under the drilling contract.
Such dayrate may be measured by
quarter-hour,
half-hour or
hourly basis and may be reduced depending on the activity
performed according to the drilling contract.
|
|
|
|
Earnings efficiency / Earnings efficiency on
hire: Earnings efficiency measures the
effective earnings ratio, expressed as a percentage of the full
earnings rate, after reducing for certain operations paid at a
reduced rate, non-productive time at zero rate, or off hire
without dayrates. Earnings efficiency on hire measures the
earning efficiency only for the period during which the drilling
unit is on contract and does not include off-hire periods.
|
|
|
|
Mobilization / demobilization
fees: In connection with drilling contracts,
Ocean Rig may receive revenues for preparation and mobilization
of equipment and personnel or for capital improvements to the
drilling vessels, dayrate or fixed price mobilization and
demobilization fees.
|
|
|
|
Revenue: For each contract, Ocean Rig
determines whether the contract, for accounting purposes, is a
multiple element arrangement, meaning it contains both a lease
element and a drilling services element, and, if so, identify
all deliverables (elements). For each element Ocean Rig
determines how and when to recognize revenue.
|
|
|
|
Term contracts: These are contracts
pursuant to which Ocean Rig agrees to operate the unit for a
specified period of time. For these types of contracts, Ocean
Rig determines whether the arrangement is a multiple element
arrangement. For revenues derived from contracts that contain a
lease, the lease elements are recognized as Leasing
revenues in the statement of operations on a basis
approximating straight line over the lease period. The drilling
services element is recognized as Service revenues
in the period in which the services are rendered at fair value
rates. Revenues related to the drilling element of mobilization
and direct incremental expenses of drilling services are
deferred and recognized over the estimated duration of the
drilling period.
|
|
|
|
Well contracts: These are contracts
pursuant to which Ocean Rig agrees to drill a certain number of
wells. Revenue from dayrate based compensation for drilling
operations is recognized in the period during which the services
are rendered at the rates established in the contracts. All
mobilization revenues, direct incremental expenses of
mobilization and contributions from customers for capital
improvements are initially deferred and recognized as revenues
over the estimated duration of the drilling period.
|
Revenue
from Drilling Contracts
Ocean Rigs drilling revenues are driven primarily by the
number of drilling units in its fleet, the contractual dayrates
and the utilization of the drilling units. This, in turn, is
affected by a number of factors, including the amount of time
that Ocean Rigs drilling units spend on planned off-hire
class work, unplanned off-hire maintenance and repair, off-hire
upgrade and modification work, reduced dayrates due to reduced
efficiency or non-productive time, the age, condition and
specifications of Ocean Rigs drilling units, levels of
supply and demand in the rig market, the price of oil and other
factors affecting the market dayrates for drilling units.
Historically, industry participants have increased supply of
drilling units in periods of high utilization and dayrates. This
has resulted in an oversupply and caused a decline in
utilization dayrates. Therefore, dayrates have historically been
very cyclical.
Rig
Operating Expenses
Rig operating expenses include crew wages and related costs,
catering, the cost of insurance, expenses relating to repairs
and maintenance, the costs of spares and consumable stores,
shore based costs and other miscellaneous expenses. Ocean
Rigs rig operating expenses, which generally represent
fixed costs, have historically increased as a result of the
business climate in the offshore drilling sector. Specifically,
wages and vendor supplied spares, parts and services have
experienced a significant price increase over the previous two
to three years. Other factors beyond Ocean Rigs control,
some of which may affect the offshore drilling industry in
general, including developments relating to market prices for
insurance, may also cause these expenses to increase. In
addition, these rig operating
100
expenses are higher when operating in harsh environments, though
an increase in expenses is typically offset by the higher
dayrates Ocean Rig receives when operating in these conditions.
Depreciation
Ocean Rig depreciates its drilling units on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. Specifically, Ocean Rig
depreciates bare-decks over 30 years and other asset parts
over five to 15 years. Ocean Rig expenses the costs
associated with a five-year periodic class work.
Management
Fees to Related Party
From October 19, 2007 to December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig
was party to, with respect to the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Ocean Rig Olympia, separate management agreements
with Cardiff pursuant to which Cardiff provided additional
supervisory services in connection with these drillships
including, among other things: (i) assisting in securing
the required equity for the construction; (ii) negotiating,
reviewing and proposing finance terms; (iii) assisting in
marketing towards potential contractors; (iv) assisting in
arranging, reviewing and supervising all aspects of building,
equipment, financing, accounting, record keeping, compliance
with laws and regulations; (v) assisting in procuring
consultancy services from specialists; and (vi) assisting
in finding prospective joint-venture partners and negotiating
any such agreements. Pursuant to the management agreements,
Ocean Rig paid Cardiff a management fee of $40,000 per month per
drillship plus (i) a chartering commission of 1.25% on
revenue earned; (ii) a commission of 1.0% on the shipyard
payments or purchase price paid for drillships; (iii) a
commission of 1.0% on loan financing; and (iv) a commission
of 2.0% on insurance premiums. In accordance with the Addenda
No. 1 to the above management agreements, dated as of
December 1, 2010, these management agreements were
terminated effective December 21, 2010; however, all
obligations to pay for services rendered by Cardiff prior to
termination remain in effect. As of December 31, 2010,
these obligations totaled $5.8 million. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, total charges from Cardiff under the
management agreement amounted to $4.0 million. This was
capitalized as drillship under construction cost, being a cost
directly attributable to the construction of the two drillships,
the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia.
See Management of Drilling Units.
General
and Administrative Expenses
Ocean Rigs general and administrative expenses mainly
include the costs of its offices, including salary and related
costs for members of senior management and its shore-side
employees.
Interest
and Finance Costs
In 2008, Ocean Rig completed a refinancing of Ocean Rig ASA,
which was later reorganized into Drill Rigs Holdings Inc., to
replace its secured bank debt and two bond issuances with
secured bank debt only. Please see Business
Description of Indebtedness Existing Credit
Facilities $1.04 billion senior secured credit
facility. As of December, 31, 2009 and after the
completion of the acquisitions of the four newbuilding
drillships in March and May 2009, Ocean Rig had total
indebtedness of $1.2 billion. As of December 31, 2010,
Ocean Rig had indebtedness of $1.26 billion. Ocean Rig
capitalizes its interest on the debt Ocean Rig has incurred in
connection with its drillships under construction.
Results
of Operations
Included in this document are Ocean Rigs unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and Ocean Rigs audited
consolidated historical financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Also included in this
document are Ocean Rigs unaudited pro forma condensed
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2008 and the audited consolidated historical financial
statements of Ocean Rig ASA (our predecessor) as of May 14,
2008 and for the period from January 1 to May 14, 2008.
101
Ocean Rig acquired 30.4% of the shares in Ocean Rig ASA on
December 20, 2007. Ocean Rig acquired additional shares of
Ocean Rig ASA during 2008. After acquiring more than 33% of
Ocean Rig ASAs outstanding shares, Ocean Rig, as required
by Norwegian Law, launched a mandatory bid for the remaining
shares of Ocean Rig ASA at a price of NOK45 per share ($8.89 per
share). Ocean Rig gained control over Ocean Rig ASA on
May 14, 2008. Up to May 14, 2008, Ocean Rig recorded
its minority share of Ocean Rig ASAs results of operations
under the equity method of accounting. The results of operations
related to Ocean Rig ASA are consolidated in Ocean Rigs
financial statements starting May 15, 2008. The mandatory
bid expired on June 11, 2008. As of July 10, 2008,
Ocean Rig had acquired 100% of the shares in Ocean Rig ASA.
During the period between May 15, 2008 and July 10,
2008, Ocean Rig reflected the minority shareholders interests in
net income of Ocean Rig ASA on the line Net income attributable
to non controlling interest in its consolidated statement of
operations. The step acquisition was accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting.
Ocean Rigs results of operations for the full year ended
December 31, 2008 are presented because Ocean Rig was
formed in December 2007. However, Ocean Rig did not have any
meaningful operations prior to the acquisition of control of
Ocean Rig ASA on May 14, 2008. The pro forma 2008 financial
results included herein gives effect to the acquisition of Ocean
Rig ASA as if the transactions had occurred on January 1,
2008. Please see the unaudited pro forma statement of operations
included elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus that was derived from, and
should be read in conjunction with, Ocean Rigs historical
consolidated financial statements for the period January 1,
2008 to December 31, 2008 and the historical consolidated
financial statements of Ocean Rig ASA for the period
January 1, 2008 to May 14, 2008, which are included
elsewhere in this proxy statement / prospectus. The
unaudited pro forma condensed pro forma statement of operations
has been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP consistent
with those used in Ocean Rigs historical consolidated
financial statements.
Restatement
of Previously Issued Financial Statements for 2009
Ocean Rig restated its previously-reported consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009,
to reflect the correction of an error in computing capitalized
interest expense for rigs under construction and to correct an
error to reverse the reclassification into earnings of that
portion of interest that should have remained in accumulated
other comprehensive loss. For additional information see
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
The misstatements for 2009 were not detected by Ocean Rigs
internal control over financial reporting because of the absence
of an effectively-designed control to verify that the entire
population of borrowings and borrowing costs was captured in
Ocean Rigs calculation. There was also the absence of an
effectively-designed control to identify those cash flow hedges
for which the interest on the associated borrowings was
capitalized. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of Ocean Rigs annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. As a result of the errors, Ocean Rig has concluded
that Ocean Rig had a material weakness in its internal controls
over financial reporting.
To remediate the material weakness in Ocean Rigs internal
control over financial reporting as described above, Ocean
Rigs management is designing and implementing additional
controls to remediate this material weakness, specifically by
adding additional procedures over the relevant computations
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Implementing a new process and control over the determination of
the completeness of the population of borrowings used in the
determination of Ocean Rigs capitalization rate; and
|
|
|
|
Implementing a new process and control over the identification
of derivative hedging instruments associated with borrowings
used in determining Ocean Rigs capitalization rate.
|
Ocean Rig anticipates that the actions described above will
remediate the material weakness. The material weakness will only
be considered remediated when the revised internal controls are
operational for a period of time and are tested and Ocean
Rigs management has concluded that the controls are
operating effectively.
102
Six-Month
Period Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six-Month Period
Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 to
|
|
|
2011 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(U.S. Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and service revenues
|
|
$
|
189,838
|
|
|
$
|
236,657
|
|
|
$
|
46,819
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
189,228
|
|
|
|
235,955
|
|
|
|
46,727
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
59,938
|
|
|
|
104,224
|
|
|
|
44,286
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37,966
|
|
|
|
64,908
|
|
|
|
26,942
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
107,979
|
|
|
|
184,862
|
|
|
|
76,883
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income / (loss)
|
|
|
81,249
|
|
|
|
51,093
|
|
|
|
(30,156
|
)
|
|
|
(37.1
|
)%
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(22,214
|
)
|
|
|
(16,476
|
)
|
|
|
287.1
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
78.4
|
%
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(34,501
|
)
|
|
|
(18,616
|
)
|
|
|
15,885
|
|
|
|
(46.0
|
)%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3,752
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
3,306
|
|
|
|
(88.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance expenses, net
|
|
|
(38,166
|
)
|
|
|
(30,882
|
)
|
|
|
7,284
|
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before taxes
|
|
|
43,083
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
(22,872
|
)
|
|
|
(53.1
|
)%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(11,938
|
)
|
|
|
(9,778
|
)
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
31,145
|
|
|
$
|
10,433
|
|
|
$
|
(20,712
|
)
|
|
|
(66.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Revenues from leasing and service activities under Ocean
Rigs drilling contracts increased by $46.8 million,
or 24.7%, to $236.7 million for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, compared to $189.8 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the
Leiv Eiriksson was employed under the Petrobras contract
at a maximum dayrate of $583,000, including a maximum 8% bonus
until April 10, 2011. The earnings efficiency during
drilling operations in the period from January 1, 2011 to
February 3, 2011, when demobilization commenced was 99.9%.
The earnings efficiency during demobilization from February 3 to
April 10, 2011 was 97.0%. On April 19, 2011 the rig
commenced mobilization under the Cairn contract for drilling
offshore Greenland at a maximum dayrate of $550,000 plus a
mobilization fee. The mobilization was completed on May 25,
2011. During the mobilization period the rig earned a
mobilization fee of $7.0 million, which was deferred to be
recognized over the drilling period. The earnings efficiency
during the period from May 25, 2011 to June 30, 2011
was 95.5%. The earnings efficiency during the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011 was 92.7%. From January 1 to
February 24, 2010, the rig was mobilized for drilling
operations in the Black Sea, and $26.5 million of revenue
related to this period was deferred. The earnings efficiency for
this period was 90.4% and the earnings efficiency during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was 93.2%. The
deferred revenue was amortized over the drilling period under
the contract, starting on February 24, 2010 with
$8.4 million amortized to revenue in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $3.6 million
amortized to revenue in the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, representing $2.1 million under the Petrobras
contract and $1.5 million under the Cairn contract.
103
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, while
employed under the Tullow Oil contract, the Eirik Raude
earned a maximum dayrate of $647,000 for the period from
January 1 to February 15, 2011, after which the maximum
dayrate increased to $665,000. During the six-month period ended
June 30, 2010, while employed under the Tullow Oil
contract, the Eirik Raude earned a maximum dayrate of
$629,000 for the period from January 1 to February 15,
2010, after which the maximum dayrate on the same contract
increased to $647,000. The earnings efficiency for the Erik
Raude was 95.5% for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, compared to an earnings efficiency of 97.2% for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010. Deferred revenue was
amortized over the drilling period under the contract, with
$1.5 million amortized to revenue in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1.5 million
amortized to revenue in the six-month period ended June 30,
2011.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the
Ocean Rig Corcovado was employed under the Cairn contract
at a maximum dayrate of $560,000. The rig completed a
winterization upgrade from January 3, 2011 to
February 3, 2011, as requested by the client, while earning
a reduced day rate of $200,000 in addition to being reimbursed
$12 million cost for the upgrade. The rig commenced
mobilization February 3, 2011 at a fixed mobilization fee
of $17 million in addition to fuel. All revenue, as well as
reimbursement of winterization costs, has been deferred and will
be amortized over the drilling period under the contract. The
rig commenced drilling operations offshore Greenland on
May 20, 2011. During the period May 20 to June 30,
2011 $12.4 million of deferred revenue was amortized to
revenue. The earnings efficiency in the six month period ending
June 30, 2011 was 93.2%. The vessel did not generate any
revenue in 2010 as it was still under construction.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the
Ocean Rig Olympia was employed from April 1, 2011
under the Vanco contract at a maximum dayrate of $415,000. The
rig commenced mobilization April 1, 2011 at a mobilization
day rate of $180,000 in addition to fuel. Such mobilization fee
has been deferred and will be amortized over the drilling period
under the contract. The rig commenced drilling operations
offshore Ghana on May 14, 2011. During the period May 14 to
June 30, 2011 $1.1 million of deferred revenue was
amortized to revenue. The earnings efficiency in the period
ending June 30, 2011 was 88.65%. The vessel did not
generate any revenue in 2010 as it was still under construction.
The increase in revenue in 2011 of $46.8 million was mainly
due to the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig
Olympia
start-ups
that contributed $28.5 million and $16.8 million of
revenue respectively. Deferral of $26.5 million of revenue
under the Petrobras contract for the Leiv Eiriksson for
the period from January 1, 2010 to February 24, 2010
was basically offset by absence of revenue recognition during
the period between the Petrobras contract demobilization ended
April 10, 2010 and the Greenland mobilization completion on
May 25, 2011.
Other revenues include amortization of the fair value of
contracts from the purchase price allocation of Ocean Rig ASA.
Other revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011
was a reduction to revenue of $0.7 million which was
largely unchanged from the six-month period ended June 30,
2010 when the reduction to revenue $0.6 million. The amount
in both periods relates to the amortization of the fair value
above the market value for the acquired Tullow drilling contract.
Drilling
Rigs Operating Expenses
Drilling rigs operating expenses increased by
$44.3 million, or 73.9%, to $104.2 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to
$59.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2010. The increase in operating expenses was mainly due to
$17.8 million related to the 10 year class survey of
Leiv Eiriksson,
start-up
of operations of the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean
Rig Olympia with $13.9 million and $8.4 million
respectively. In addition, for the period from January 1 to
February 24, 2010, the Leiv Eiriksson was mobilized
for drilling operations in the Black Sea and $9.2 million
of operating expenses related to this period was deferred. These
effects were partly offset by deferral of $7.0 million of
Leiv Eiriksson operating expenses during the period
between the Petrobras contract demobilization ended
April 10, 2010 and the Greenland mobilization completion on
May 25, 2011. The deferred operating expenses in 2010 are
amortized over the Petrobras contract drilling period under the
contract, which began on February 24, 2010 with
$4.5 million in the six-month period ended June 30,
2010, compared to $2.7 million amortized in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011, representing $1.1 million
of costs amortized in the period January 1 to February 3,
2011 under the Petrobras contract and representing
$1.6 million of costs amortized in the period May 25 to
June 30, 2011 under the Cairn contract. The operating
expenses related to the Ocean Rig
104
Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia operations,
excluding insurance and onshore base operations, during their
respective mobilizations amounted in total to
$26.1 million, have been deferred and will be amortized
over the drilling period under the contract. Amortizations to
operating expenses amounted in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011 to $4.9 million and $0.9 million
for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia
respectively.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization increased by $26.9 million,
or 71.0%, to $64.9 million for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, compared to $38.0 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
mainly due to $18.1 million of depreciation related to the
Ocean Rig Corcovado that Ocean Rig took delivery of on
January 3, 2011 and $9.0 million of depreciation
related to the Ocean Rig Olympia that Ocean Rig took
delivery of on March 30, 2011.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by
$5.7 million, or 56.1%, to $15.7 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to
$10.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2010, primarily due
build-up of
the organization to manage a higher number of drilling units, as
well as advisory costs related to Ocean Rigs initial
public offering.
Interest
and Finance Costs
Interest and finance costs increased by $16.5 million, or
278,1%, to $22.2 million for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, compared to $5.7 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
mainly due to higher average debt level, new debt financing
costs, and higher interest rates.
Interest
Income
Interest income increased by $4.6 million, or 78.4%, to
$10.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, compared to $5.8 million for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010. The increase was mainly due to higher
average bank deposits.
Gain/(Loss)
on Interest Rate Swaps
We recorded a loss related to interest swaps of
$18.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, compared to a loss of $34.5 million in the comparable
period in 2010, on interest rate swaps that did not qualify for
hedge accounting. As of June 30, 2010, 3 of total 11 swaps
qualified for hedge swap accounting. As of January 1, 2011,
Ocean Rig removed the designation of the cash flow hedges and
discontinued hedge accounting.
The loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, was
due to mark to market losses from a decreasing interest rate
level for the applicable interest swap durations.
Other,
Net
Other, net increased by $3.3 million, or 88.1%, to a loss
of $0.4 million for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, compared to a loss of $3.8 million for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2010. The decrease is
due to lower net losses on currency forward contracts.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes decreased by $2.2 million, or 18.1%, to
$9.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, compared to $11.9 million for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, primarily reflecting a shorter period
of Leiv Eiriksson operations in Turkey under the 5% withholding
tax regime. Since the drilling rigs operate in international
waters around the world, they may become subject to taxation in
many different jurisdictions. The basis for such taxation
depends on the relevant regulation in the countries in which
Ocean Rig operates. Consequently, there is no expected
relationship between the income tax expense or benefit for the
period and the income or loss before taxes.
105
Net
Income
Net income decreased by $20.7 million to
$10.4 million, or 66.5%, for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, compared to $31.1 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily reflecting
$76.9 million higher operating expenses, $11.9 million
higher total net financing cost, partly offset by
$46.7 million higher revenues, $15.9 million lower
loss interest rate swaps, $3.3 million lower loss from
unrealized forex contracts and $2.2 million lower taxes.
Year
Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2009, as Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 to
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
(As Restated)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(U.S. Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and service revenues
|
|
$
|
373,525
|
|
|
$
|
403,162
|
|
|
$
|
29,637
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
14,597
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
(12,047
|
)
|
|
|
(82.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
388,122
|
|
|
|
405,712
|
|
|
|
17,590
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
133,256
|
|
|
|
119,369
|
|
|
|
(13,887
|
)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)%
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
75,092
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Loss on sale of equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
17,955
|
|
|
|
19,443
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
226,559
|
|
|
|
215,362
|
|
|
|
11,197
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
161,563
|
|
|
|
190,350
|
|
|
|
28,787
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(46,120
|
)
|
|
|
(8,418
|
)
|
|
|
37,702
|
|
|
|
(81.7
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
6,205
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
%
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
|
|
(45,129
|
)
|
|
|
(935.1
|
)%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(45.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance expenses, net
|
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
|
|
(35,153
|
)
|
|
|
(2,141
|
)
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before taxes and equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
128,551
|
|
|
|
155,197
|
|
|
|
26,646
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(12,797
|
)
|
|
|
(20,436
|
)
|
|
|
(7,639
|
)
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
Equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss),
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
19,007
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
134,761
|
|
|
$
|
19,007
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Ocean Rigs revenues from leasing and service activities
under its drilling contracts increased by $29.6 million net
of agent fees of 1% applicable during the period under the
Petrobras contract, or 7.9%, to $403.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, compared to $373.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
106
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Leiv
Eiriksson was employed under the Petrobras contract at a
maximum dayrate of $583,000, including a maximum 8% bonus. The
earnings efficiency during the period from February 24,
2010, when drilling operations commenced, to December 31,
2010 was 89.8%. The earnings efficiency during mobilization from
January 1 to February 24, 2010 was 90.4%, and thus the
earnings efficiency during the year ended December 31, 2010
was 90.0%. From January 1 to February 24, 2010, the rig was
mobilized for drilling operations in the Black Sea, and
$26.5 million of revenue related to this period was
deferred. The deferred revenue is amortized over the drilling
period under the contract, starting on February 24, 2010,
of which $19.6 million was recognized in the year ended
2010. During 2009, the Leiv Eiriksson was employed under
the Shell contract in Norway and in the UK until
October 26, 2009, at a maximum dayrate of $511,000 and had
an earning efficiency of 90.4%. On October 27, 2009 it
commenced the Petrobras contract and started mobilization for
the Black Sea operations. Revenue of $33.2 million for
October 27, 2009 to December 31, 2009 was deferred to
be amortized over the drilling period under the contract, which
began on February 24, 2010. The earnings efficiency from
October 27, 2009 to December 31, 2009 was 93.9%, and
therefore, the earnings efficiency during the year ended
December 31, 2009 was 90.8%.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, while employed
under the Tullow Oil contract, the Eirik Raude earned a
maximum dayrate of $629,000 for the period from January 1 to
February 15, 2010, after which the maximum dayrate
increased to $647,000. During the year ended December 31,
2009, while employed under the Tullow Oil contract, the Eirik
Raude earned a maximum dayrate of $611,000 for the period
from January 1 to February 15, 2009, after which the
maximum dayrate on the same contract increased to $629,000. The
earnings efficiency for the Eirik Raude was 95.5% for the
year ended December 31, 2010, compared to an earnings
efficiency of 99.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The increase in Ocean Rigs revenue was mainly due to the
deferral of $59.7 million of revenue under the Petrobras
contract for the Leiv Eiriksson for the period from
October 27, 2009 to February 24, 2010 which resulted
in $19.6 million of the deferred revenue being recognized
in 2010, compared to $3.5 million of deferred revenue under
the Shell contract being recognized in 2009. In addition, higher
day rates for the rigs in 2010 resulted in increased revenue of
$13.6 million in 2010 compared to 2009.
Other Ocean Rig revenues include amortization of the fair value
of contracts from the purchase price allocation of Ocean Rig ASA
and a settlement of litigation. Other revenues decreased by
$12.0 million, or 82.5%, to $2.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, compared to $14.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009. Amortization of the fair
value of the drilling contracts from the acquisition of Ocean
Rig ASA decreased by $15.8 million, which was partly offset
by the settlement in the third quarter of 2010 of a legal
dispute in Ocean Rigs favor of $3.8 million.
Drilling
Rigs Operating Expenses
Ocean Rigs drilling rigs operating expenses decreased by
$13.9 million, or 10.4%, to $119.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
$133.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The decrease in operating expenses was mainly due to lower crew
costs of $6.0 million and catering costs of
$3.4 million from 2010, the result of operations in Turkey
in 2010, where costs are lower than they were in Norway, where
Ocean Rig operated in 2009, and higher maintenance activity in
2009 compared to 2010 of $2.8 million.
From January 1 to February 24, 2010, the Leiv Eiriksson
was mobilized for drilling operations in the Black Sea and
$9.2 million of deferred operating expenses related to this
period was deferred. The deferred operating expenses are
amortized over the drilling period under the contract, which
began on February 24, 2010, of which $10.7 million has
been recognized as cost in 2010 compared to $2.8 million
recognized as deferred cost in 2009.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Ocean Rigs depreciation and amortization expense of
$75.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
materially unchanged from 2009.
107
Loss
on Disposal of Assets
Ocean Rig recorded a loss on sale of assets of $1.5 million
as a result of the disposal of various drilling rig equipment
for the year ended December 31, 2010. There was no such
gain or loss for the year ended December 31, 2009.
General
and Administrative Expenses
Ocean Rigs general and administrative expenses increased
by $1.5 million, or 8.3%, to $19.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
$18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
primarily due to higher consulting fees.
Interest
and Finance Costs
Ocean Rigs interest and finance costs decreased by
$37.7 million, or 81.7%, to $8.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, compared to $46.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was due to a
higher level of capitalization of interest expense and lower
average debt levels.
Interest
Income
Ocean Rigs interest income increased by $6.2 million,
or 99.1%, to $12.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010, compared to $6.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was mainly due
to higher interest rates on bank deposits and higher average
bank deposits included in restricted cash.
Gain/(loss)
on Interest Rate Swaps
Ocean Rig recorded an unrealized loss of $40.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to an unrealized
gain of $4.8 million in 2009, on interest rate swaps that
did not qualify for hedge accounting. The loss for the year
ended December 31, 2010 was due to
mark-to-market
losses from a decreasing interest rate level for the applicable
interest swap durations.
Other,
Net
Ocean Rigs other, net decreased by $0.9 million, or
45.4%, to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2010, compared to $2.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The decrease is due to lower gains on
currency forward contracts.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes increased by $7.6 million, or 59.7%, to
$20.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to $12.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, mainly due to withholding tax of
$7.9 million for operations in Turkey in 2010 for the
Leiv Eiriksson, which was not applicable for 2009. Since
the drilling rigs operate in international waters around the
world, they may become subject to taxation in many different
jurisdictions. The basis for such taxation depends on the
relevant regulation in the countries in which Ocean Rig
operates. Consequently, there is no expected relationship
between the income tax expense or benefit for the period and the
income or loss before taxes. In 2009, the internal
reorganization continued and certain entities ceased to be
taxable in Norway, resulting in the reversal of remaining net
deferred tax assets and the associated valuation allowance. As a
result, there was no impact on deferred tax expense due to the
change in the tax status of the entities. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, the income taxes primarily represent
withholding taxes for the operations of the Eirik Raude
in Ghana and the Leiv Eiriksson in Turkey of
$11.4 million and $7.9 million, respectively, while
for the year ended December 31, 2009, the taxes primarily
represented withholding tax for the operations of the Eirik
Raude in Ghana of $11.4 million. During the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Leiv Eiriksson was operating
in the U.K. and Norway and incurred an immaterial amount of tax
charges in the U.K. and no tax charges in Norway due to tax loss
carry forward.
108
Net
Income
Ocean Rigs net income increased by $19.0 million to
$134.8 million, or 16.4%, for the year ended
December 31, 2010, compared to $115.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, primarily reflecting
$43.9 million lower net financing cost, $17.6 million
higher revenues and $11.2 million lower total operating
expenses, partly offset by a $45.1 million negative
variance due to the loss on interest rate swaps in the year
ended December 31, 2010 and $7.6 million higher taxes.
Year
Ended December 31, 2009, as Restated, Compared to Year
Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
2009 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(As Restated)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(U.S. Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and service revenues
|
|
$
|
202,110
|
|
|
$
|
373,525
|
|
|
$
|
171,415
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
16,553
|
|
|
|
14,597
|
|
|
|
(1,956
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
218,663
|
|
|
|
388,122
|
|
|
|
169,459
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
86,229
|
|
|
|
133,256
|
|
|
|
47,027
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
%
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(761,729
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
45,432
|
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
29,916
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,462
|
|
|
|
17,955
|
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
907,852
|
|
|
|
226,559
|
|
|
|
(681,293
|
)
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(689,189
|
)
|
|
|
161,563
|
|
|
|
850,752
|
|
|
|
(123.4
|
)%
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(71,692
|
)
|
|
|
(46,120
|
)
|
|
|
25,572
|
|
|
|
(35.7
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
%
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
4,323
|
|
|
|
(188.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance expenses, net
|
|
|
(70,959
|
)
|
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
|
|
26,758
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes and equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
(760,148
|
)
|
|
|
128,551
|
|
|
|
877,517
|
|
|
|
(115.4
|
)%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(2,844
|
)
|
|
|
(12,797
|
)
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
350.0
|
%
|
Equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(764,047
|
)
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
879,801
|
|
|
|
(115.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non controlling interest
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
(113.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
$
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
881,601
|
|
|
|
(115.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rigs results of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 are presented because Ocean Rig was
formed in December 2007; however, Ocean Rig did not have any
meaningful operations prior to the acquisition of control of
Ocean Rig ASA on May 14, 2008. The successor financial
statements for 2008 include the parent company activities for
January 1 to December 31, 2008, loss under the equity
method for the investment in Ocean Rig ASA up to May 14,
2008 and the consolidated results of Ocean Rig ASA since the
acquisition date.
109
Revenues
Ocean Rigs total revenues increased by
$169.5 million, or 77.5%, to $388.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
$218.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Of the increase, $99.2 million was due to the
12 months earnings contribution in 2009 compared to a
7.5 month contribution in 2008. Deferred revenue was
recognized with $6.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Leiv
Eiriksson worked under the Shell contract at a maximum
dayrate of $512,000 and under the Petrobras contract at a
maximum dayrate of $583,000. The Leiv Eiriksson commenced
the Petrobras contract on October 27, 2009 and during the
mobilization period from October 27, 2009 to
December 31, 2009, revenues of $33.2 million were
deferred and will be amortized to revenue as wells are drilled.
The mobilization period under the Petrobras contract continued
until drilling commenced on February 24, 2010. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Leiv Eiriksson
earned maximum dayrates of $511,000 and $476,000 under the
Shell contract in Norway and the Shell contract in the U.K.,
respectively. The earnings efficiency for the Leiv Eiriksson
was 90.8% for 2009 compared to 83.2% for 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, under the Tullow
Oil contract, the Eirik Raude earned a maximum dayrate of
$611,000 that increased to $629,000 on February 15, 2009.
Under the ExxonMobil contract for the year ended 2008, the
Eirik Raude earned a maximum dayrate of $395,000. The
earnings efficiency for the Eirik Raude was 99.7% for
2009 compared to an earnings efficiency of 94.1% for 2008.
Drilling
Rigs Operating Expenses
Ocean Rigs drilling rigs operating expenses increased by
$47.0 million, or 54.5%, to $133.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
$86.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The increase was mainly due to the 12 months of expenses in
2009 compared to the 7.5 months in 2008, partly offset by
the deferral of $21.8 million of the Leiv
Eirikssons operating expenses from October 27,
2009 to December 31, 2009, under the Petrobras contract
during the mobilization period. Deferred cost recognized in the
year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.4 million compared
to $1.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2008.
Goodwill
Impairment
An impairment charge of $761.7 million was recognized in
2008, as a result of the impairment testing performed on
goodwill at December 31, 2008 following the acquisition of
Ocean Rig ASA. Following the impairment charge, all goodwill was
impaired. From the date of the acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA in
May 2008 through the annual goodwill impairment test performed
on December 31, 2008, the market declined significantly and
various factors negatively affected industry trends and
conditions, which resulted in the revision of certain key
assumptions used in determining the fair value of Ocean
Rigs investment and, therefore, the implied fair value of
goodwill. During the second half of 2008, the credit markets
tightened, driving up the cost of capital and long-term weighted
average cost of capital increased. In addition, the economic
downturn and volatile oil prices resulted in a downward revision
of projected cash flows in Ocean Rigs discounted cash
flows analysis for Ocean Rigs 2008 impairment testing.
Furthermore, the decline in the global economy negatively
impacted publicly traded company multiples used when estimating
fair value under the market approach. Based on results of its
annual goodwill impairment analysis, Ocean Rig determined that
the carrying value of its goodwill was impaired.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Ocean Rigs depreciation and amortization expense increased
by $29.9 million, or 65.8%, to $75.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
$45.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The increase was mainly due to the increased period of
consolidation of Ocean Rigs drilling rigs in 2009.
General
and Administrative Expenses
Ocean Rigs general and administrative expenses increased
by $3.5 million, or 24.0%, to $18.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
$14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The increase
110
was mainly due to the fact that Ocean Rig ASAs results
were only consolidated for 7.5 months in 2008, partly
offset by the change in control related costs from Ocean
Rigs acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA, described in the
paragraph below.
Interest
and Finance Costs
Ocean Rigs interest and finance costs decreased by
$25.6 million, or 35.7%, to $46.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $71.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease is mainly
due to the repayment of the Acquisition Facility in first half
2009, as well as the absence of the $26.9 million
refinancing costs in 2008. These effects were partly offset by
the Ocean Rig ASA and related interest and finance costs being
consolidated for 12 months in 2009 as compared to
7.5 months in 2008.
Interest
Income
Ocean Rigs interest income amounted to $6.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
$3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, due
to interest income for 12 months in 2009 compared to
7.5 months in 2008.
Gain/(loss)
on Interest Rate Swaps
Ocean Rig recognized a gain on interest rate swaps, which did
not qualify for hedge accounting, of $4.8 million during
2009. Ocean Rig did not hold these swaps in 2008.
Other,
Net
A gain of $2.0 million was recognized during 2009 compared
to a loss of $2.3 million during 2008. This was mainly due
to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar and a corresponding
gain on currency forward contracts to sell U.S. Dollars.
Ocean Rig enters into currency forward contracts to hedge
against currency exposure related to operating expense in
currencies other than U.S. Dollars. The company typically
hedges a percentage of next 12 months currency exposure.
Income
Taxes
Ocean Rigs income taxes increased by $10.0 million to
$12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $2.8 million for the 7.5 month period
ended December 31, 2008. The taxes for 2009 primarily
represent withholding taxes for the operations of the Eirik
Raude in Ghana. In December 2008, the ownership of the
drilling rigs were redomiciled to the Marshall Islands, which
has no corporate income taxes. In 2008, the drilling rigs were
domiciled in Norway, which has a 28% tax rate. However, Ocean
ASA and its subsidiaries had built up a large deferred tax asset
in Norway related to net loss carry forwards, which were fully
offset by a valuation allowance since it was not deemed more
likely that not that such assets would be realized. Subsequent
to the acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA in May 2008, Ocean Rig began
an internal reorganization to redomicile its activities outside
of Norway. This created a taxable gain in 2008 that utilized a
portion of the existing net loss carry forwards in Norway with a
corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance. As a result,
the reorganization had no impact on total income tax expense for
the period. In addition, nontaxable goodwill was impaired in
2008 for which there was no tax deduction. In 2009, the internal
reorganization continued and certain entities ceased to be
taxable in Norway resulting in the reversal of remaining net
deferred tax assets and the associated valuation allowance. As a
result, there was no impact on deferred tax expense due to the
change in the tax status of the entities. Since the drilling
rigs operate in international waters around the world, they may
become subject to taxation in many different jurisdictions. The
basis for such taxation depends upon the relevant regulation in
that country. Consequently, there is not an expected
relationship between the income tax expense or benefit for the
period and the income or loss before taxes. In 2008, the largest
part of the income tax expense related to operations in the
U.S. while for 2009, the income tax related to activities
in Ghana.
111
Equity
in Loss of Investee
Equity in loss of investee amounted to $1.1 million in the
year ended December 31, 2008. This represents the amount of
loss that was attributable to the holding of Ocean Rigs
shares prior to obtaining control of Ocean Rig ASA for the
period from January 1, 2008 to May 14, 2008. There was
no such income/loss for the year ended December 31, 2009
since Ocean Rig ASAs results were consolidated for the
entire period.
Net
Income/(Loss)
Ocean Rigs net income increased by $879.8 million to
$115.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to a loss of $765.8 million for the for the
7.5 month period ended December 31, 2008, reflecting
$169.5 million higher revenue, $681.2 million lower
operating expenses mainly due to the impairment of goodwill in
2008, $26.8 million lower financing costs, partly offset by
$10.0 million higher taxes, as discussed above.
Non-Controlling
Interest
Ocean Rigs net income allocated to non-controlling
interest amounted to a loss of $1.8 million in the year
ended December 31, 2008 and $0 for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This represents the amount of
consolidated income that is not attributable to Ocean Rig from
May 14, 2008 until July 10, 2008, when Ocean Rig
acquired 100% of Ocean Rig ASA.
112
Year
Ended December 31, 2009, as Restated, Compared to Pro Forma
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Pro forma)
|
|
|
UDW Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
2009 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(As Restated)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(U.S. Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and service revenues
|
|
$
|
301,282
|
|
|
$
|
373,525
|
|
|
$
|
72,243
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
25,363
|
|
|
|
14,597
|
|
|
|
(10,766
|
)
|
|
|
(42.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
326,645
|
|
|
|
388,122
|
|
|
|
61,477
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
134,373
|
|
|
|
133,256
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(761,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
71,708
|
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,602
|
|
|
|
17,955
|
|
|
|
(8,647
|
)
|
|
|
(32.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
994,412
|
|
|
|
226,559
|
|
|
|
(767,853
|
)
|
|
|
77.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(667,767
|
)
|
|
|
161,563
|
|
|
|
829,330
|
|
|
|
(124.2
|
)%
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(124,669
|
)
|
|
|
(46,120
|
)
|
|
|
78,549
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,414
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
4,323
|
|
|
|
(188.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(123,555
|
)
|
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
|
|
90,543
|
|
|
|
(73.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before taxes and equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
(791,322
|
)
|
|
|
128,551
|
|
|
|
919,873
|
|
|
|
(116.2
|
)%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
|
(12,797
|
)
|
|
|
(8,316
|
)
|
|
|
185.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
$
|
(795,803
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
911,557
|
|
|
|
(114.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion gives effect to the acquisition of
Ocean Rig ASA as if the transactions had occurred on
January 1, 2008. Please see the unaudited pro forma
statement of operations included elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus that was derived from, and
should be read in conjunction with, the historical consolidated
financial statements of Ocean Rig for the period January 1,
2008 to December 31, 2008 and Ocean Rig ASA for the period
January 1, 2008 to May 14, 2008, which are included
elsewhere in this proxy statement / prospectus. See
Results of Operations.
Revenues
Ocean Rigs revenues from leasing and service activities
under Ocean Rigs drilling contracts were
$373.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $301.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This was an increase of
$72.2 million, or 24%. The increase was mainly due to a
higher dayrate of $611,000 for the Eirik Raude in 2008
and 2009 under the Tullow Oil contract, which the rig commenced
in 2008 after the termination of its contract with ExxonMobil,
compared to a dayrate of $395,000 in 2008 under the ExxonMobil
contract, but was also due in part to higher earnings
efficiencies for both rigs. This was partly offset by the
deferral of revenue of $33.2 million during the period from
October 27, 2009 to December 31, 2009 during the
mobilization of the Leiv Eiriksson to the Black Sea.
Deferred revenue was recognized with $6.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $5.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
113
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Leiv
Eiriksson worked under the Shell contract at a maximum
dayrate of $512,000 and under the Petrobras contract at a
maximum dayrate of $583,000. The Leiv Eiriksson commenced
the Petrobras contract on October 27, 2009. During the
mobilization period from October 27, 2009 to
December 31, 2009, revenues of $33.2 million were
deferred and will be amortized to revenue as wells are drilled.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Leiv
Eiriksson earned maximum dayrates of $511,000 and $476,000
under the Shell contract in Norway and the Shell contract in the
U.K., respectively. The earnings efficiency for the Leiv
Eiriksson was 90.8% for 2009 compared to 83.2% for 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, under the Tullow
Oil contract, the Eirik Raude earned a maximum dayrate of
$611,000 for the period from January 1 to February 14, when
the rate increased to $629,000. Under the ExxonMobil contract
for the year ended 2008, the Eirik Raude earned a maximum
dayrate of $395,000. The Eirik Raude commenced the Tullow
Oil contract October 9, 2008, at a maximum dayrate of
$611,000. The earnings efficiency for the Eirik Raude was
99.8% for 2009 compared to an earnings efficiency of 94.1% for
2008.
Other revenues decreased by $10.8 million to
$14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $25.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, reflecting amortization of the fair
value of the drilling contracts from the purchase price
allocation. The decrease is primarily attributable to the fact
that amortization of one contract was completed after eight
months in 2009, but was amortized throughout the entire year
ended 2008.
Drilling
Rigs Operating Expenses
Ocean Rigs drilling rigs operating expenses of
$133.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
were relatively unchanged from the year ended December 31,
2008.
The Leiv Eiriksson commenced the Petrobras contract on
October 27, 2009. During the mobilization period from
October 27, 2009 to December 31, 2009, costs of
$21.8 million were deferred and will be amortized to rig
operating expense as wells are drilled.
Deferred cost recognized in the year ended December 31,
2009 was $4.4 million compared to $0.5 million in the
year ended December 31, 2008.
Goodwill
Impairment
An impairment charge of $761.7 million was recognized in
2008 as a result of the impairment testing performed on goodwill
at December 31, 2008, following the acquisition of Ocean
Rig ASA. Following the impairment charge, all goodwill was
impaired. From May 14, 2008, the date the Ocean Rig
acquired Ocean Rig ASA, through the annual goodwill impairment
test performed on December 31, 2008, the offshore drilling
market declined significantly and various factors negatively
affected industry trends and conditions, which resulted in the
revision of certain key assumptions used in determining the fair
value of Ocean Rigs investment and therefore the implied
fair value of goodwill. During the second half of 2008, the
credit markets tightened, driving up the cost of capital.
Therefore, Ocean Rig increased the rate of long-term weighted
average cost of capital. In addition, the economic downturn and
volatile oil prices resulted in a downward revision of projected
cash flows in Ocean Rigs forecasted discounted cash flows
analysis for its 2008 impairment testing. Furthermore, the
decline in the global economy negatively impacted publicly
traded company multiples used when estimating fair value under
the market approach. Based on results of Ocean Rigs annual
goodwill impairment analysis, Ocean Rig determined that the
carrying value of its goodwill was impaired.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Ocean Rigs depreciation and amortization expense increased
by $3.6 million, or 5.1%, to $75.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$71.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The increase was mainly due to the higher depreciation and
amortization basis arising from capital expenditures during 2009.
General
and Administrative Expenses
Ocean Rigs general and administrative expenses decreased
by $8.6 million, or 32.5%, to $18.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$26.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The decrease was mainly
114
due to the fact that general and administrative expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2008 included a provision of
$3.1 million related to an investment bank claim for
financial advisory fees and the
change-of-control-related
costs triggered by Ocean Rigs acquisition of control of
Ocean Rig ASA in May 2008. The
change-of-control
costs mainly related to increased employee compensation expenses
of $2.7 million due to stock-based compensation becoming
immediately vested as a result of
change-of-control
provisions in the employee option agreements and
$1.3 million due to costs incurred under the management
retention bonus program.
Interest
and Finance Costs
Ocean Rigs interest and finance costs decreased by
$78.5 million, or 63.0%, to $46.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $124.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was
mainly due to the incurrence of $26.9 million of expenses
in 2008 related to the refinancing of the notes issued in 2005
and 2006 with the $1.04 billion credit facility. In
addition, the interest and finance costs in 2009 from the
$1.04 billion credit facility declined compared to the
financing in 2008 under the notes issued in 2005 and 2006. The
refinancing resulted in expenses of $26.9 million in 2008
related to redemption costs and accelerated amortization of debt
issuance costs. The level of outstanding debt in 2009 was
impacted by debt related to the four drillships under
construction, which were acquired in March and May 2009. At year
end 2009, the balance of the debt incurred in connection with
the acquisition of the drillships was $416.3 million.
However, $24.4 million of the related interest expense was
capitalized as part of the construction costs for the
drillships. During 2008 the drillships under construction were
not yet acquired and consequently there was no related interest
expense or capitalized interest.
On May 9, 2008, Ocean Rig concluded a guarantee facility of
NOK5.0 billion (approximately $974,500) and a term loan of
$800,000 in order to guarantee the purchase price of the Ocean
Rig ASA shares to be acquired through the mandatory offering and
to finance the acquisition cost of the Ocean Rig ASA shares. The
loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin. For purposes of the
pro forma information, it is assumed that the loan was drawn
down from January 1, 2008 and therefore had interest
expense for the whole year. The interest rate assumed was based
upon the LIBOR in effect at the actual acquisition date of
May 14, 2008. The total pro forma adjustment for interest
expense for the period from January 1, 2008 to May 15,
2008 amounted to $11,316.
Interest
Income
Interest income amounted to $6.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, compared to $3.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to the impact
of higher cash balances and restricted cash in 2009 partly
offset by higher interest rate levels in 2008 compared to 2009.
Gain/(Loss)
on Interest Rate Swaps
Ocean Rig recognized a gain on interest rate swaps, which did
not qualify for hedge accounting, of $4.8 million during
the year ended December 31, 2009. There was no such gain or
loss for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Other,
Net
A gain of $2.0 million was recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2009, compared to a loss of $2.3 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008, principally for
currency forward contracts. The main reason for the 2008 loss
was a substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar, and a
corresponding loss on currency forward contracts for
U.S. Dollars sales. The main reason for the 2009 gain was a
substantial depreciation of the U.S. Dollar, and a
corresponding gain on currency forward contracts for
U.S. Dollars sales.
Income
Taxes
Ocean Rigs income taxes increased by $8.3 million, to
$12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $4.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The taxes for 2009 and 2008 primarily
represent withholding taxes for drilling. In December 2008, the
ownership of the drilling rigs had been redomiciled to the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, which has no corporate income
taxes. In 2008, the drilling rigs were domiciled in Norway with
a 28% tax rate. However, Ocean Rig ASA and its subsidiaries had
historically built up a large deferred tax asset in Norway
related to net loss carry forwards which were fully offset by a
valuation allowance since it was
115
not deemed more likely than not that such assets would be
realized. Subsequent to the acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA in May
2008, Ocean Rig began an internal reorganization to redomicile
that companys activities outside of Norway. This created a
taxable gain in 2008 that utilized a portion of the existing net
loss carry forwards in Norway with a corresponding reduction in
the valuation allowance. As a result, this had no impact on
total income tax expense for the period. In addition, nontaxable
goodwill was impaired in 2008 for which there was no tax
deduction. In 2009, the internal reorganization continued and
certain entities ceased to be taxable in Norway resulting in the
reversal of remaining net deferred tax assets and the associated
valuation allowance. As a result, there was no impact on
deferred tax expense due to the change in the tax status of the
entities. Since the drilling rigs operate in international
waters around the world, they may become subject to taxation in
many different jurisdictions. The basis for such taxation
depends on the relevant regulation in the country. Consequently,
there is no expected relationship between the income tax expense
or benefit for the period and the income or loss before taxes.
The 2009 taxes primarily represent withholding taxes for the
operations of the Eirik Raude in Ghana that commenced in
November 2008 of $11.4 million. In 2008, income taxes
primarily related to drilling operations in Ghana, the U.K., the
United States and Ireland.
Net
Income/(Loss)
Ocean Rigs net income increased by $911.6 million, to
$115.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to a loss of $795.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, reflecting $61.5 million higher
revenue, $767.9 million lower operating expenses mainly due
to the impairment of goodwill in 2008 and $81.4 million
lower financing costs, which were partly offset by
$8.3 million higher taxes, as discussed above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $191.7 million and
$220.2 million of restricted cash related mainly to
collateral or minimum liquidity covenants contained in its loan
agreements. As of December 31, 2010, Ocean Rig had cash and
cash equivalents of approximately $95.7 million and
$562.8 million of restricted cash related mainly to
collateral or minimum liquidity covenants contained in Ocean
Rigs loan agreements. Furthermore, as of June 30,
2011, Ocean Rig had total bank debt of $2.12 billion. As of
December 31, 2010, Ocean Rig had total bank debt of
$1.26 billion.
On January 3, 2011, in connection with the delivery of the
Ocean Rig Corcovado, Ocean Rig paid the final shipyard
installment of $289.0 million. On January 4, 2011,
Ocean Rig repaid its $300 million short term overdraft
facility from the restricted cash from the escrow account
securing the loan. On January 5, 2011, Ocean Rig drew down
the full amount of the $325 million short term loan
facility. On March 18, 2011, Ocean Rig repaid the
outstanding amount of $115.0 million under its
$230.0 million loan agreement. On March 30, 2011,
Ocean Rig took delivery of the Ocean Rig Olympia and paid
$288.4 million as the final construction installment
payment to the shipyard. During March and April 2011, Ocean Rig
borrowed an aggregate of $175.5 million from DryShips
through shareholder loans for capital expenditures and general
corporate purposes. On April 20, 2011, these intercompany
loans were repaid. On April 18, 2011, in connection with
the exercise of the first of the six newbuilding drillship
options, Ocean Rig entered into a shipbuilding contract for the
first of its seventh generation hulls and paid
$207.6 million to the shipyard. On April 19, 2011,
Ocean Rig repaid an amount of $24.9 million under its
Deutsche Bank credit facilities and during 2011 to the date of
this proxy statement / prospectus, Ocean Rig paid an
aggregate amount of $135.8 million under its
$1.04 billion credit facility. On April 20, 2011,
Ocean Rig drew down the full amount of its $800.0 million
senior secured term loan agreement and repaid its
$325.0 million short-term credit facility. On
April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig issued $500.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of its 9.5% senior unsecured
notes due 2016, from which Ocean Rig received net proceeds of
$487.5 million. On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig entered
into an agreement with the lenders to restructure the Deutsche
Bank credit facilities. The principal terms of the restructuring
are as follows: (i) the maximum amount permitted to be
drawn under each facility was reduced from $562.5 million
to $495.0 million; (ii) in addition to the guarantee
already provided by DryShips, Ocean Rig provided an unlimited
recourse guarantee that includes certain financial covenants,
which are discussed below; and (iii) Ocean Rig is permitted
to draw under the facility with respect to the Ocean Rig
Poseidon based upon the fixture of the drillship under its
drilling contract with Petrobras Tanzania, and on April 27,
2010, the cash collateral deposited for this vessel was
released. On August 10, 2011, Ocean Rig amended the terms
of the
116
credit facility for the construction of the Ocean Rig Mykonos
to allow for full drawdowns to finance the remaining
installment payments for this drillship based on the Petrobras
Brazil contract and on August 10, 2011, the cash collateral
deposited for the drillship was released.
Ocean Rigs cash and cash equivalents increased by
$96.0 million to $191.7 million as of June 30,
2011, compared to $95.7 million as of December 31,
2010. As of December 31, 2010, Ocean Rigs cash and
cash equivalents decreased by $138.5 million to
$95.7 million, compared to $234.2 million as of
December 31, 2009. Working capital is defined as current
assets minus current liabilities (including the current portion
of long-term debt).
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had a working capital
surplus of $9.4 million, compared to a working capital
surplus of $4.1 million as of December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, Ocean Rigs working capital
surplus was $4.1 million, compared to a working capital
deficit of $123.7 million, as of December 31, 2009.
The increase in Ocean Rigs working capital position was
primarily due to the number of loans classified as long term
debt for 2010 compared to 2009 when a greater number of loans
were classified as current due to the breach of covenants by
DryShips and cross-default provisions in its loan agreements,
which resulted in a technical cross-default under Ocean
Rigs loan agreements.
If Ocean Rig does not strengthen its working capital surplus, or
if Ocean Rig returns to a working capital deficit and such a
working capital deficit continues to grow, lenders may be
unwilling to provide future financing or will provide future
financing at significantly increased interest rates, which will
negatively affect Ocean Rigs earnings, liquidity and
capital position, and its ability to make timely payments on its
newbuilding purchase contracts and to meet its debt repayment
obligations. Ocean Rig expects that the lenders will not demand
payment of loans before their maturity, provided that Ocean Rig
pays loan installments and accumulated accrued interest as they
come due under the existing facilities. Ocean Rig plans to
settle the loan interest and scheduled loan repayments with cash
generated from operations.
Ocean Rigs principal use of funds has been capital
expenditures to establish and grow its fleet, maintain the
quality of its drilling units, comply with international
standards, environmental laws and regulations, fund working
capital requirements and make principal repayments on
outstanding loan facilities. Since its formation, Ocean
Rigs principal source of funds has been equity provided by
its shareholders through their equity offerings or at the market
sales, operating cash flows and long-term borrowings. From
January 1, 2009 to December 3, 2010, Ocean Rig
received $1.3 billion in cash from its parent company,
DryShips, in the form of capital contributions to meet
obligations for capital expenditures on Ocean Rigs
drillships under construction and debt repayments during the
period. In 2011 year to date, Ocean Rig has not received
cash capital contributions from DryShips. As Ocean Rig is no
longer a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips, even if it is able
to do so, DryShips may be unwilling to provide continued funding
for Ocean Rigs capital expenditure requirements or only
provide such funding in return for market rate repayment and
interest rates or issuances of equity securities, which could be
significantly dilutive to other shareholders. In March and April
2011, Ocean Rig borrowed an aggregate amount of
$175.5 million from DryShips through shareholder loans,
which Ocean Rig repaid in full in April 2011.
Based on its current liquidity position, Ocean Rig does not
expect to require funding from DryShips over the next
12 months. Excluding its three recently-exercised
newbuilding drillship options, its newbuilding program is fully
financed with bank debt and anticipated internal cash flow.
Further, all pre-delivery payments have been made under Ocean
Rigs three recently-exercised drillship options. The
delivery payments for each of these drillships is due in 2013
and Ocean Rig expects to finance these payments with cash on
hand, operating cash flow and bank debt that Ocean Rig intends
to arrange.
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had aggregate debt
outstanding of $2.12 billion, inclusive of deferred
financing costs amounting to $47.1 million, of which
$231.2 million was classified as current on Ocean
Rigs balance sheet. As of December 31, 2010, Ocean
Rig had aggregate debt outstanding of $1.26 billion,
inclusive of deferred financing costs amounting to
$27.8 million, of which $560.6 million, was classified
as current on its balance sheet. As of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, Ocean Rig had $717.4 million and
$928.3 million, respectively, of unutilized credit
facilities for the construction of the Ocean Rig Poseidon
and the Ocean Rig Mykonos. The credit facility for
the Ocean Rig Mykonos requires that any drawdowns under
the facility be
117
collateralized with an equivalent deposit to restricted cash
until Ocean Rig finds suitable employment for that drillship.
While the contract with Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig
Mykonos does not satisfy the minimum dayrates and terms
required under this credit facility, on August 10, 2011,
Ocean Rig and its lenders amended the credit facility based on
the Petrobras Brazil contract to allow for drawdowns and the
release of collateral deposited for the Ocean Rig Mykonos.
As of December 31, 2010, Ocean Rig had purchase commitments
of approximately $1.37 billion, which represented the
remaining construction and construction-related payments for the
Ocean Rig Olympia, which was delivered on March 30,
2011, the Ocean Rig Poseidon, which was delivered on
July 28, 2011, and the Ocean Rig Mykonos, which was
delivered on September 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2011,
Ocean Rig had substantial purchase commitments mainly
representing the remaining yard installments of
$614.7 million for the Ocean Rig Poseidon, which was
delivered on July 28, 2011, and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, which was delivered on September 30, 2011. In
addition, in the second quarter of 2011, Ocean Rig exercised
three of its options with Samsung for the construction of three
additional ultra-deepwater drillships and, accordingly, entered
into shipbuilding contracts for its seventh generation hulls,
which are scheduled to be delivered in July 2013, September 2013
and November 2013, respectively, for a total estimated project
cost per drillship of $638.0 million, consisting of
$570.0 million of construction costs, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses of
$30.0 million. In connection with the exercise of these
options, Ocean Rig paid $207.6 million, $207.4 million
and $217.4 million, respectively, to the shipyard in the
second quarter of 2011. Ocean Rig intends to apply a portion of
the proceeds from its 9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016
to fund the construction of its seventh generation hulls.
However, Ocean Rig will have remaining construction and
construction-related payments of approximately $1.2 billion
coming due in 2013 for which it has not yet arranged financing.
The remaining three optional drillships have an estimated total
project cost, excluding financing costs, of $638.0 million
each. To the extent Ocean Rig exercises any of the three options
it has with Samsung for the construction of three additional
newbuilding drillships, with an estimated cost of
$1.9 billion in the aggregate, Ocean Rig will incur
additional payment obligations for which it has not arranged
financing. These options are exercisable by Ocean Rig any time
on or prior to January 31, 2012; their exercise would
result in payment at the time of the exercise of an aggregate of
$701.8 million if the options are exercised at the same
specifications as the first three options.
Ocean Rig drew down the Deutsche Bank credit facility for the
construction of the Ocean Rig Poseidon based upon the
employment of the drillship under its drilling contract with
Petrobras Tanzania, and on April 27, 2011, the cash
collateral deposited for this vessel was released. On
August 10, 2011, Ocean Rig amended the terms of the
Deutsche Bank credit facility for the construction of the
Ocean Rig Mykonos to allow for full drawdowns to finance
the remaining installment payments for this drillship based on
the Petrobras Brazil contract and on August 10, 2011, the
cash collateral deposited for the drillship was released. The
amendment also requires that the Ocean Rig Mykonos be
re-employed under a contract acceptable to the lenders meeting
certain minimum terms and dayrates at least six months, in lieu
of 12 months, prior to the expiration of the Petrobras
Brazil contract. All other material terms of the credit facility
were unchanged.
Ocean Rig expects that its existing cash balances, internally
generated cash flows, drawdowns under the credit facilities for
the construction of the Ocean Rig Mykonos and proceeds
from the issuance of new debt or equity will fulfill anticipated
obligations such as scheduled debt maturities, committed capital
expenditures and working capital needs. Additionally, DryShips
has committed to provide cash to meet Ocean Rigs liquidity
needs throughout 2011. See note 1.b. to the consolidated
financial statements. However, as discussed above, due to Ocean
Rigs current liquidity position, which is mainly driven by
transactions concluded in April 2011, including its entry into
the $800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement and
its issuance of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount
of 9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016, Ocean Rig does not
expect to require funding from DryShips over the next
12 months. If Ocean Rig requires financing from DryShips
over the next 12 months and such financing is not
available, Ocean Rig does not expect the lack of financing from
DryShips to have a material impact on its ability to satisfy its
liquidity requirements and to finance future operations over the
next 12 months and intend to cover any shortfalls with new
bank debt that Ocean Rig would seek to obtain.
Ocean Rigs internally generated cash flow is directly
related to its business and the market sectors in which Ocean
Rig operates. Should the drilling market deteriorate, or should
Ocean Rig experience poor results in its
118
operations, cash flow from operations may be reduced. As of the
date of this proxy statement / prospectus, Ocean Rig
believes that amounts available under its existing credit
facilities, current cash balances, as well as operating cash
flow, together with any debt or equity issuances in the future,
will be sufficient to meet its liquidity needs for the next
12 months, including minimum cash requirements under its
loan agreements, and payment obligations for its newbuilding
drillships, assuming the drilling or financing markets do not
deteriorate. Ocean Rigs access to debt and equity markets
may be reduced or closed due to a variety of events, including a
credit crisis, credit rating agency downgrades of its debt,
industry conditions, general economic conditions, market
conditions and market perceptions of Ocean Rig and its industry.
Ocean Rig partially funded the construction costs of the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia with
borrowings under the $800.0 million senior secured term
loan agreement. In July 2011, Ocean Rig funded
$308.2 million and $309.3 million remaining
construction costs for the Ocean Rig Poseidon with
borrowings under the Deutsche Bank credit facility for the
construction of the drillship. In September 2011, Ocean Rig
funded the remaining construction and construction-related costs
of the Ocean Rig Mykonos, which amounted to
$305.7 million, with borrowings under its credit facilities.
Compliance
with Financial Covenants under Secured Credit
Facilities
Ocean Rigs secured credit facilities impose operating and
financial restrictions on it. These restrictions generally limit
Ocean Rigs subsidiaries ability to, among other
things (i) pay dividends, (ii) incur additional
indebtedness, (iii) create liens on their assets,
(iv) change the management
and/or
ownership of the drilling units, and (v) change the general
nature of their business. For example, Ocean Rig is prohibited
from paying dividends under its $800 million secured term
loan agreement without the lenders consent.
In addition, Ocean Rigs existing secured credit facilities
require Ocean Rig and certain of its subsidiaries to maintain
specified financial ratios and satisfy financial covenants,
mainly to ensure that the market value of the mortgaged drilling
unit under the applicable credit facility, determined in
accordance with the terms of that facility, does not fall below
a certain percentage of the outstanding amount of the loan, or a
value maintenance clause (which becomes applicable upon the
completion of construction and following the delivery of the
applicable drillship to Ocean Rig). In general, these financial
covenants relate to the maintenance of (i) minimum amount
of free cash; (ii) leverage ratio not to exceed specified
levels; (iii) minimum interest coverage ratio;
(iv) minimum current ratio (the ratio of current assets to
current liabilities); and (v) minimum equity ratio (the
ratio of value adjusted equity to value adjusted total assets).
In addition, DryShips, because it guarantees Ocean Rigs
Deutsche Bank credit facilities and Ocean Rigs
$800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement, is
required to maintain certain financial covenants, as guarantor
under the facilities. In general, these financial covenants
require DryShips to maintain (i) minimum liquidity;
(ii) a minimum market adjusted equity ratio; (iii) a
minimum interest coverage ratio; (iv) a minimum market
adjusted net worth; and (v) a minimum debt service coverage
ratio.
Furthermore, all of Ocean Rigs loan agreements also
contain a cross-default provision that may be triggered by
either a default under one of its other loan agreements or a
default by DryShips under one of its loan agreements. A
cross-default provision means that a default on one loan would
result in a default on all of Ocean Rigs other loans. A
default by DryShips under one of its loan agreements would
trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs Deutsche Bank
credit facilities and would provide Ocean Rigs lenders
with the right to accelerate the outstanding debt under these
facilities. Further, if DryShips defaults under one of its loan
agreements, and the related debt is accelerated, this would
trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs
$1.04 billion credit facility and its $800.0 million
secured term loan agreement and would provide Ocean Rigs
lenders with the right to accelerate the outstanding debt under
these facilities.
In general, a violation of financial covenants constitutes a
breach under Ocean Rigs credit facilities and its lenders
may declare an event of default, which would, unless waived by
Ocean Rigs lenders, provide its lenders with the right to
require Ocean Rig to post additional collateral, enhance its
equity and liquidity, increase its interest payments, pay down
its indebtedness to a level where Ocean Rig is in compliance
with its loan covenants, sell assets, reclassify Ocean
Rigs indebtedness as current liabilities and accelerate
its indebtedness, which would impair its ability to continue to
conduct its business.
119
Due to the decline in vessel values in the drybulk shipping
sector, DryShips was in breach of certain of its financial
covenants as of December 31, 2008 and, as a result,
obtained waiver agreements from its lenders waiving the
violations of such covenants. As of June 30, 2010, DryShips
had either regained compliance with the covenants under its loan
agreements or had the ability to remedy shortfalls in value
maintenance requirements within specified grace periods. Some of
these waiver agreements expire during 2011 and 2012, at which
time the original covenants come back into effect.
If Ocean Rigs indebtedness is accelerated pursuant to the
cross-default provisions, it will be very difficult in the
current financing environment for Ocean Rig to refinance its
debt or obtain additional financing and Ocean Rig could lose its
drilling rigs if Ocean Rigs lenders foreclose their liens.
Ocean Rig does not expect that cash on hand and cash generated
from operations would be sufficient to repay its loans that have
cross-default provisions, which aggregated approximately
$1.62 billion June 30, 2011, if that debt were to be
accelerated by the lenders. In such a scenario, Ocean Rig would
be required to raise additional funds of approximately
$2.23 billion through debt or equity issuances in order to
repay such debt and meet its capital expenditure requirements as
of June 30, 2011, although such financing may not be
available on attractive terms or at all.
Credit
Facilities
For a description of Ocean Rigs credit facilities, see
Business Description of Indebtedness
Cash
Flows
Six-month
period ended June 30, 2011 compared to period ended
June 30, 2010
Ocean Rigs cash and cash equivalents increased to
$191.7 million as of June 30, 2011, compared to
$95.7 million as of December 31, 2010, primarily due
to cash provided by new financing and operating activities
partly offset by cash used in investing activities.
Working capital is equal to current assets minus current
liabilities, including the current portion of long-term debt.
Ocean Rigs working capital surplus was $9.4 million
as of June 30, 2011, compared to a $211.0 million
working capital deficit as of June 30, 2010.
The change in working capital is primarily due to a
$320.7 million lower current interest bearing debt balance
partly offset by $124.0 million lower cash balance
including restricted cash.
Net cash
used in operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $93.9 million
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to
$99.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2010, primarily reflecting lower profitability of the operations
and higher trade related working capital partly offset by return
of margin calls.
Net cash
used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $850.8 million
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. Net cash used
in investing activities was $521.2 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2010. Ocean Rig made
shipyard payments and project capital expenditures of
approximately $1,187.7 million for six-month period ended
June 30, 2011. This compares to $483.3 million for
advances for drillships for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2010. The decrease in restricted cash was
$346.9 million during six-month period ended June 30,
2011, reflecting primarily repayment of the $300.0 million
Credit Facility with related restricted cash, compared to an
increase of $34.2 million in the corresponding period of
2010.
Net cash
provided by financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was
$853.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, consisting of $1,682.1 million in net proceeds from
new long term debt largely offset by repayments of short term
debt and the current portion of long term debt of
$829.2 million. This compares to net cash provided by
financing activities of $341.7 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 2010, mainly consisting of
$402.6 million of
120
shareholders contribution for investments partly offset by
repayment of current portion of long term debt of
$61.1 million.
Year
ended December 31, 2010 compared to year ended
December 31, 2009
Ocean Rigs cash and cash equivalents decreased to
$95.7 million as of December 31, 2010, compared to
$234.2 million as of December 31, 2009, primarily due
to cash used in investing activities which was partly offset by
cash provided by operating activities and financing activities.
Working capital is equal to current assets minus current
liabilities, including the current portion of long-term debt.
Ocean Rigs working capital surplus was $4.1 million
as of December 31, 2010, compared to a $123.7 million
working capital deficit as of December 31, 2009. The
movement from a deficit to a surplus is due to the
reclassification of long-term debt from current liabilities to
non-current liabilities due to DryShips compliance with
its covenants, which removed the technical cross-default under
Ocean Rigs loan agreements.
Net cash
used in operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$221.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to $211.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase is mainly due to increased
operational profitability during 2010.
Net cash
used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.4 billion for
the year ended December 31, 2010. Net cash used in
investing activities was $146.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Ocean Rig made shipyard payments of
approximately $999.6 million for advances for drillships
for the year ended December 31, 2010. This compares to
$130.8 million for advances for drillships for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The increase in restricted cash
was $335.9 million during 2010 and was mainly driven by a
$300.0 million short-term credit facility, which was fully
cash collateralized and was repaid in January 2011, compared to
$185.6 million in the corresponding period of 2009. The
increase in the cash used in investing activities for year ended
December 31, 2010 was mainly due to yard installments.
Net cash
provided by financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.08 billion
for the year ended December 31, 2010, consisting mainly of
shareholders contribution to fund investments of
$540.3 million, net proceeds from the private offering of
$488.3 million, proceeds from bank debt of
$308.2 million and the repayment of bank debt of
$247.7 million. Net cash used in by financing activities
was $103.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2009, consisting of shareholders contribution of
$753.4 million, proceeds from credit facilities of
$150.0 million and debt repayments of $1.0 billion.
Year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended
December 31, 2008
Ocean Rigs cash and cash equivalents decreased to
$234.2 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to
$272.9 million as of December 31, 2008, primarily due
to increased use of cash in investing and financing activities,
which was partly offset by increased cash provided by operating
activities, which was more than offset by cash used in investing
and financing activities. Working capital is equal to current
assets minus current liabilities, including the current portion
of long-term debt. Ocean Rigs working capital deficit was
$123.7 million as of December 31, 2009 compared to a
working capital deficit of $518.7 million as of
December 31, 2008. The deficit decrease mainly due to the
increase in Ocean Rigs current assets as a result of
equity issuances in 2009, a portion of which Ocean Rig used to
repay short-term credit facilities. Ocean Rigs working
capital deficit of $123.7 million at December 31, 2009
included indebtedness of $285.6 million, which had been
classified as current as a result of breach of its loan
covenants.
121
Net cash
provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by
$190.0 million to $211.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, compared to $21.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily
attributable to the contribution of drill rigs income for the
entire year of 2009 due to increased day rates.
Net cash
used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $146.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Ocean Rig made
payments of $145.0 million for asset acquisitions and
improvements, and it received $183.8 million in cash from
the acquisition of drillships and the increase for restricted
cash was $185.6 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately
$1.02 billion during 2008 consisting of $972.8 million
paid to acquire Ocean Rig ASA, $16.6 million in payments
for rig improvements and $31.3 million in the increase of
restricted cash.
Net cash
provided by financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $103.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009, consisting mainly of
net proceeds of $753.3 million from equity contributions
and the drawdown of an additional $150.0 million under the
credit facilities. This was more than offset by the repayment of
$1.0 billion of debt under its long and short-term credit
facilities.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 billion
for the year ended December 31, 2008, consisting mainly of
a $2.1 billion drawdown under short-term and long-term
facilities and $650.2 million of equity contributions,
partly offset by payments under short-term and long-term credit
facilities in the aggregate amount of $1.4 billion.
Swap
Agreements
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had 7 interest rate swap and
cap and floor agreements outstanding, with a notional amount of
$1,024.2 million, maturing from September 2011 through
November 2017. These agreements were entered into in order to
economically hedge Ocean Rigs exposure to interest rate
fluctuations with respect to its borrowings. As of
January 1, 2011, Ocean Rig discontinued hedge accounting
and, as such, changes in their fair values are included in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the six
month period ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2011,
the fair value of all of the above agreements was a liability of
$93.4 million. This fair value equates to the amount that
would be paid by Ocean Rig if the agreements were cancelled at
the reporting date, taking into account current interest rates
and Ocean Rigs creditworthiness.
As of June 30, 2011, security deposits (margin calls) of
$59.3 million were paid and were recorded as Other
non current assets in Ocean Rigs consolidated
balance sheet. These deposits are required by the counterparty
due to the market loss in the swap agreements.
As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 Ocean Rig had
outstanding 11 interest rate swap and cap and floor agreements,
with a notional amount of $733 million, $768.1 million
and $908.5 respectively, maturing from September 2011 through
November 2017. These agreements are entered into in order to
economically hedge Ocean Rigs exposure to interest rate
fluctuations with respect to its borrowings. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2009, eight of these agreements did
not qualify for hedge accounting and, as such, changes in their
fair values are included in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations. As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010 three agreements qualified for and were designated for
hedge accounting and, as such, changes in their fair values are
included in other comprehensive loss. The fair value of these
agreements equates to the amount that would be paid by Ocean Rig
if the agreements were cancelled at the reporting date, taking
into account current interest rates and Ocean Rigs
creditworthiness.
As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010,
security deposits (margin calls) of $40.7 million and
$78.6 million, respectively, were paid and were recorded as
Other non current assets in Ocean Rigs
consolidated balance sheet. These deposits are required by the
counterparty due to the market loss in the swap agreements.
122
Currency
Forward Sale Exchange Contracts
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig had currently forward sale
exchange contracts for the future sales of U.S. Dollars at
fixed rates of $7.0 million outstanding with a fair market
value of $1.1 million recorded in Financial
instruments in its consolidated balance sheet. For the
relevant period, Ocean Rig did not designate currency forward
sale exchange contracts as hedges under U.S. GAAP, and
realized and unrealized gains are included as Other, net in its
consolidated statement of operations. See note 11 to the
audited consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig.
As of December 31, 2010, Ocean Rig had currently forward
sale exchange contracts for the future sales of
U.S. Dollars at fixed rates of $28.0 million
outstanding with a fair market value of $1.5 million
recorded in Financial instruments in its
consolidated balance sheet. For the relevant period, Ocean Rig
did not designate currency forward sale exchange contracts as
hedges under U.S. GAAP, and realized and unrealized gains
are included as Other, net in Ocean Rigs consolidated
statement of operations. See note 11 to the audited
consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig.
As of December 31, 2009, Ocean Rig had currency forward
sale exchange contracts for the future sales of
U.S. Dollars at fixed rates of $20.0 million
outstanding with a fair market value of $0.4 million
recorded in Financial instruments in Ocean
Rigs consolidated balance sheet. For the relevant period,
Ocean Rig did not designate currency forward sale exchange
contracts as hedges under US GAAP, and realized and unrealized
gains and losses are included as Other, net in its consolidated
statement of operations. See note 11 to the audited
consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Ocean Rig does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Drilling units under construction: This
represents amounts Ocean Rig expends in accordance with the
terms of the construction contracts for its drillships as well
as expenses incurred directly or under a management agreement
with a related party in connection with on site supervision. In
addition, interest costs incurred during the construction (until
the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended
use) are capitalized and depreciated over the useful life of the
asset upon delivery. The carrying value of drillships under
construction, referred to as newbuildings, represents the
accumulated costs at the balance sheet date. Cost components
include payments for yard installments and variation orders,
commissions to related party, construction supervision,
equipment, spare parts, capitalized interest, costs related to
first time mobilization and not covered by the client or the
contract and commissioning costs. No charge for depreciation is
made until commissioning of the newbuilding has been completed
and it is ready for its intended use.
Capitalized interest: Interest expenses are
capitalized during the construction period of drilling units
under construction based on accumulated expenditures for the
applicable project at Ocean Rigs current rate of
borrowing. The amount of interest expense capitalized in an
accounting period is determined by applying an interest rate
(the capitalization rate) to the average amount of
accumulated expenditures for the asset during the period. The
capitalization rates used in an accounting period are based on
the actual interest rates applicable to borrowings outstanding
during the period. Ocean Rig does not capitalize amounts beyond
the actual interest expense incurred in the period.
If Ocean Rigs financing plans associate a specific new
borrowing with a qualifying asset, Ocean Rig uses the rate on
that borrowing as the capitalization rate to be applied to that
portion of the average accumulated expenditures for the asset
that does not exceed the amount of that borrowing. If average
accumulated expenditures for the asset exceed the amounts of
specific new borrowings associated with the asset, the
capitalization rate applied to such excess is a weighted average
of the rates applicable to other of Ocean Rigs borrowings.
Drilling Unit Machinery and Equipment,
Net: Drilling units are stated at historical cost
less accumulated depreciation. Such costs include the cost of
adding or replacing parts of drilling unit machinery and
equipment when that cost is incurred, if the recognition
criteria are met. The recognition criteria require that the cost
incurred
123
extends the useful life of a drilling unit. The carrying amounts
of those parts that are replaced are written off and the cost of
the new parts is capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on a
straight- line basis over the useful life of the assets as
follows: bare-deck, 30 years and other asset parts, 5 to
15 years.
Drilling unit machinery and equipment, information technology
and office equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated on
a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, for
drilling unit machinery and equipment over 5 to 15 years
and for information technology and office equipment over
5 years.
Goodwill and intangible assets: Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated
fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate possible impairment. Ocean Rig tests
goodwill for impairment annually. Goodwill is not amortized.
Ocean Rig has no other intangible assets with an indefinite
life. Ocean Rig tests for impairment each year on
December 31.
Ocean Rig tests goodwill for impairment by first comparing the
carrying value of the reporting unit, which is defined as an
operating segment or a component of an operating segment that
constitutes a business for which financial information is
available and is regularly reviewed by management, to its fair
value. Ocean Rig estimates the fair value of the reporting unit
by weighting the combination of generally accepted valuation
methodologies, including both income and market approaches.
For the income approach, Ocean Rig applies un-discounted
projected cash flows. To develop the projected net cash flows
from its reporting unit, which are based on estimated future
utilization, dayrates, projected demand for its services, and
rig availability, Ocean Rig considers key factors that include
assumptions regarding future commodity prices, credit market
uncertainties and the effect these factors may have on its
contract drilling operations and the capital expenditure budgets
of its customers.
For the market approach, Ocean Rig derives publicly traded
company multiples from companies with operations similar to its
reporting unit by using information publicly disclosed by other
publicly traded companies and, when available, analyses of
recent acquisitions in the marketplace.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying
value, no further testing is required. This is referred to as
Step 1. If the fair value is determined to be less than the
carrying value, a second step, Step 2, is performed to compute
the amount of the impairment, if any. In this process, an
implied fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on
the fair value of the operations, and is compared to its
carrying value. The shortfall of the implied fair value of
goodwill below its carrying value represents the amount of
goodwill impairment.
All of Ocean Rigs goodwill was impaired as at
December 31, 2008.
Ocean Rigs finite-lived acquired intangible assets are
recorded at historical cost less accumulated amortization.
Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the intangibles as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets/Liabilities
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
10
|
|
Software
|
|
|
10
|
|
Fair value of above market acquired time charters over remaining
contract term
Trade names and software constitute the item Intangible
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
amortization of these items are included in the line
Depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets: Ocean Rig
reviews for impairment long-lived assets and intangible
long-lived assets held and used whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets
may not be recoverable. In this respect, Ocean Rig reviews its
assets for impairment on a rig by rig and asset by asset basis.
When the estimate of undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest
charges, expected to be generated by the use of the asset is
less than its carrying amount, Ocean Rig evaluates the asset for
impairment loss. The impairment loss is determined by the
difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the fair
value of the asset.
124
As at December 31, 2009 and 2010, Ocean Rig performed an
impairment review of its long-lived assets due to the global
economic downturn, the significant decline in drilling rates in
the rig industry and the outlook of the oil services industry.
Ocean Rig compared undiscounted cash flows with the carrying
values of its long-lived assets to determine if the assets were
impaired. In developing estimates of future cash flows, Ocean
Rig relied upon assumptions made by management with regard to
its rigs, including future drilling rates, utilization rates,
operating expenses, future dry docking costs and the estimated
remaining useful lives of the rigs. These assumptions are based
on historical trends as well as future expectations in line with
Ocean Rigs historical performance and its expectations for
future fleet utilization under its current fleet deployment
strategy, and are consistent with the plans and forecasts used
by management to conduct its business. The variability of these
factors depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainty
about future events and general economic conditions; therefore,
Ocean Rigs accounting estimates might change from period
to period. As a result of the impairment review, Ocean Rig
determined that the carrying amounts of its assets held for use
were recoverable, and therefore, concluded that no impairment
loss was necessary for 2009 and 2010.
Fair value of above/below market acquired drilling contract: In
a business combination, Ocean Rig identifies assets acquired or
liabilities assumed and records all such identified assets or
liabilities at fair value. Favorable or unfavorable drilling
contracts exist when there is a difference between the
contracted dayrate and the dayrates prevailing at the
acquisition date. The amount to be recorded as an asset or
liability at the acquisition date is based on the difference
between the then-current fair values of a charter with similar
characteristics as the time charter assumed and the net present
value of future contractual cash flows from the time charter
contract assumed. When the present value of the time charter
assumed is greater than the then-current fair value of such
charter, the difference is recorded as Fair value of above
market acquired time charter. When the opposite situation
occurs, the difference is recorded as Fair value of
below-market acquired time charter. Such assets and
liabilities are amortized as a reduction of or an increase in
Other revenue, over the period of the time charter
assumed.
Deferred financing costs: Deferred financing
costs include fees, commissions and legal expenses associated
with Ocean Rigs long-term debt and are capitalized and
recorded net with the underlying debt. These costs are amortized
over the life of the related debt using the effective interest
method and are included in interest expense. Unamortized fees
relating to loans repaid or refinanced as debt extinguishments
are expensed as interest and finance costs in the period the
repayment or extinguishment is made.
Revenue
and Related Expenses
Revenues: Ocean Rigs services and
deliverables are generally sold based upon contracts with its
customers that include fixed or determinable prices. Ocean Rig
recognizes revenue when delivery occurs, as directed by Ocean
Rigs customer, or the customer assumes control of physical
use of the asset and collectability is reasonably assured. Ocean
Rig evaluates if there are multiple deliverables within its
contracts and whether the agreement conveys the right to use the
drill rigs for a stated period of time and meet the criteria for
lease accounting, in addition to providing a drilling services
element, which are generally compensated for by dayrates. In
connection with drilling contracts, Ocean Rig may also receive
revenues for preparation and mobilization of equipment and
personnel or for capital improvements to the drilling rigs and
dayrate or fixed price mobilization and demobilization fees.
Revenues are recorded net of agents commissions. There are
two types of drilling contracts: well contracts and term
contracts.
Well contracts: Well contracts are contracts
under which the assignment is to drill a certain number of
wells. Revenue from dayrate-based compensation for drilling
operations is recognized in the period during which the services
are rendered at the rates established in the contracts. All
mobilization revenues, direct incremental expenses of
mobilization and contributions from customers for capital
improvements are initially deferred and recognized as revenues
over the estimated duration of the drilling period. To the
extent that expenses exceed revenue to be recognized, they are
expensed as incurred. Contingent demobilization revenues are
recognized as the amounts become known over the demobilization
period. Non-contingent demobilization revenues are recognized
over the estimated duration of the drilling period. All costs of
demobilization are expensed as incurred. All revenues for well
contracts are recognized as Service revenues in the
statement of operations.
Term contracts: Term Contracts are contracts
under which the assignment is to operate the drilling unit for a
specified period of time. For these types of contracts Ocean Rig
determines whether the arrangement is a multiple
125
element arrangement containing both a lease element and drilling
services element. For revenues derived from contracts that
contain a lease, the lease elements are recognized as
Leasing revenues in the statement of operations on a
basis approximating straight line over the lease period. The
drilling services element is recognized as Service
revenues in the period in which the services are rendered
at fair value. Revenues related to the drilling element of
mobilization and direct incremental expenses of drilling
services are deferred and recognized over the estimated duration
of the drilling periods. To the extent that expenses exceed
revenue to be recognized, they are expensed as incurred.
Contingent demobilization revenues are recognized as the amounts
become known over the demobilization period. Non-contingent
demobilization revenues are recognized over the estimated
duration of the drilling period. All costs of demobilization are
expensed as incurred. Contributions from customers for capital
improvements are initially deferred and recognized as revenues
over the estimated duration of the drilling contract.
Income taxes: Income taxes have been provided
for based upon the tax laws and rates in effect in the countries
in which Ocean Rigs operations are conducted and income is
earned. There is no expected relationship between the provision
for/or benefit from income taxes and income or loss before
income taxes because the countries in which Ocean Rig operates
have taxation regimes that vary not only with respect to the
nominal rate, but also in terms of the availability of
deductions, credits and other benefits. Variations also arise
because income earned and taxed in any particular country or
countries may fluctuate from year to year. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax
effects of temporary differences between the financial statement
basis and the tax basis of Ocean Rigs assets and
liabilities using the applicable jurisdictional tax rates in
effect at the year end. A valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or
all of the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be
realized. Ocean Rig accrues interest and penalties related to
its liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
income tax expense.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, clarifying guidance was issued on
multiple-element revenue arrangements. The revised guidance
primarily provides two significant changes: (i) it
eliminates the need for objective and reliable evidence of the
fair value of the undelivered element in order for a delivered
item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting; and
(ii) it eliminates the residual method to allocate the
arrangement consideration. In addition, the guidance also
expands the disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. The
new guidance will be effective for the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early
adoption permitted provided that the revised guidance is
retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption.
Ocean Rig implemented the new guidance on January 1, 2011
on a prospective basis. The revisions to the criteria for
separating consideration did not and will not impact its
accounting for revenue recognition because the guidance for
allocating arrangement consideration between leasing and
non-leasing elements is unchanged.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-01,
Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of
Stock and Cash which amends FASB ASC 505, Equity in order
to clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to
shareholders that allows the shareholder to elect to receive
cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of
cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate
is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per
share prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of
applying FASB ASC 505, Equity and FASB ASC 260,
Earnings Per Share. Ocean Rig has not been involved in any such
distributions and thus, the impact to Ocean Rig cannot be
determined until any such distribution occurs.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)-Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU
2010-06
amends ASC 820 to add new requirements for disclosures
about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies
existing fair value disclosures about the level of
disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. The ASU also amends guidance on
employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan
assets under ASC 715 to require that disclosures be
provided by classes of assets instead of by major categories of
assets. The guidance in the ASU was effective for the first
reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide
the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal
126
years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any
impact on Ocean Rigs financial position and results of
operation.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-09,
Subsequent Events (Topic 855). ASU
2010-09
amends ASC 855 to clarify which entities are required to
evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial
statements are issued and the scope of the disclosure
requirements related to subsequent events. The amendments remove
the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through
which management evaluated subsequent events in both issued and
revised financial statements. Revised financial statements
include financial statements revised as a result of either
correction of an error or retrospective application of
U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the FASB has clarified that if the
financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is
not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the
financial statements were issued or available to be issued and
the date the revised financial statements were issued or
available to be issued. Those amendments remove potential
conflicts with the SECs literature. All of the amendments
in this update are effective upon its issuance, except for the
use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment
is effective for interim or annual periods ending after
June 15, 2010. The adoption of the above amendments of ASU
2010-09
require Ocean Rig to disclose the date through which management
evaluated subsequent events in its consolidated financial
statements until it becomes a public company.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-11,
Derivatives and Hedging- Scope Exception Related to Embedded
Credit Derivatives (Topic 815) which addresses application
of the embedded derivative scope exception in
ASC 815-15-15-8
and 15-9.
The ASU primarily affects entities that hold or issue
investments in financial instruments that contain embedded
credit derivative features, however, other entities may also
benefit from the ASUs transition provisions, which permit
entities to make a special one-time election to apply the fair
value option to any investment in a beneficial interest in
securitized financial assets, regardless of whether such
investments contain embedded derivative features. The ASU is
effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its
first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted at the beginning of any fiscal quarter
beginning after March 5, 2010. Ocean Rig has not engaged in
any such contracts and thus, the impact to Ocean Rig cannot be
determined until any such contact is entered.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-13,
Compensation-Stock Compensation, Effect of Denominating the
Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of
the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades a
consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (Topic
718) which Update addresses the classification of a
share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in
the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security
trades. Topic 718 is amended to clarify that a share-based
payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency
of a market in which a substantial portion of the entitys
equity securities trades shall not be considered to contain a
market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, such an
award is not to be classified as a liability if it otherwise
qualifies as equity classification. The amendments in this
Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2010. The amendments in this update should be
applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of retained earnings. The cumulative-effect
adjustment should be calculated for all awards outstanding as of
the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendments are
initially applied, as if the amendments had been applied
consistently since the inception of the award. The
cumulative-effect adjustment should be presented separately.
Earlier application is permitted. Ocean Rig does not have such
share-based payments and thus Ocean Rig does not expect the
guidance to have any impact on its financial position and
results of operation.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-04,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in
U.S. GAAP and IFRSs
(ASU 2011-04).
This newly issued accounting standard clarifies the application
of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands
the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated
using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This
ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011,
which for Ocean Rig means January 1, 2012. Ocean Rig does
not expect that adoption of this standard will have a material
impact on its financial position or results of operations.
127
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated (ASU)
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) (ASU
2011-05).
This newly issued accounting standard (1) eliminates the
option to present the components of other comprehensive income
as part of the statement of changes in stockholders
equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the
statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and
(3) requires an entity to present reclassification
adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other
comprehensive income to net income. The amendments in this ASU
do not change the items that must be reported in other
comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive
income must be reclassified to net income nor do the amendments
affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This
ASU is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods within those three years
beginning after December 15, 2011, which for Ocean Rig
means January 1, 2012. As this accounting standard only
requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will
not impact Ocean Rigs financial position or results of
operation.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table sets forth Ocean Rigs contractual
obligations and their maturity dates as of December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1st Year
|
|
|
2nd Year
|
|
|
3rd Year
|
|
|
4th Year
|
|
|
5th Year
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
1,285,357
|
|
|
|
568,333
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
522,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases(2)
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan(3)
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1279
|
|
Drillships under construction/ Ocean Rig Corcovado and
Ocean Rig Olympia(4)
|
|
|
576,513
|
|
|
|
576,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drillships under construction/ Ocean Rig Poseidon and
Ocean Rig Mykonos(5)
|
|
|
765,955
|
|
|
|
765,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and borrowing fees(5)
|
|
|
84,335
|
|
|
|
43,093
|
|
|
|
27,035
|
|
|
|
14,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations to Cardiff(6)
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,721,052
|
|
|
|
1,960,684
|
|
|
|
222,487
|
|
|
|
536,329
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The outstanding balance of Ocean Rigs long-term debt at
December 31, 2010 was $1,285 million (gross of
unamortized deferred financing fees and bond redemption costs of
$27 million). Ocean Rigs loans bear interest at LIBOR
plus a margin. The amounts in the table above do not include
interest payments. |
|
(2) |
|
Ocean Rig has entered into a new five year office lease
agreement with Vestre Svanholmen 6 AS which commenced on
July 1, 2007. This lease includes an option for an
additional five year term, which must be exercised at least six
months prior to the end of the term of the contract which
expires in June 2012. The lease agreements relating to office
space are considered to be operational lease contracts. The
figures also include minor operating lease agreements. |
|
(3) |
|
Ocean Rig has three defined benefit plans for employees managed
and funded through Norwegian life insurance companies at
December 31, 2010. The pension plans covered
55 employees by year end 2010. Pension liabilities and
pension costs are calculated based on the actuarial cost method
as determined by an independent third-party actuary. |
|
(4) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, an amount of $1,512.7 million
was paid to the shipyard representing the first, second, third
and fourth installments for Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
first, second, third and fourth installments for the Ocean
Rig Olympia, the first, second, third and fourth
installments for the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the first,
second and third installments for the Ocean Rig Mykonos. |
|
(5) |
|
Ocean Rigs long-term debt outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 bears variable interest at a margin over
LIBOR, but to some extent such variable interest is fixed by
Ocean Rigs existing interest rate swaps. The calculation
of interest payments is based on the weighted average interest
rate including hedge accounting |
128
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate swaps of 4.39% as of December 31, 2010. Ocean
Rigs $325.0 million loan, drawn down on
January 5, 2011 and repaid in April 2011, has been included
in the Interest and borrowing fee calculation. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents amounts earned by Cardiff under management agreements
terminated on December 21, 2010 which become due in 2011. |
Derivative
Instruments
Ocean Rig is exposed to a number of different financial market
risks arising from Ocean Rigs normal business activities.
Financial market risk is the possibility that fluctuations in
currency exchange rates and interest rates will affect the value
of Ocean Rigs assets, liabilities or future cash flows.
To reduce and manage these risks, management periodically
reviews and assesses its primary financial market risks. Once
risks are identified, appropriate action is taken to mitigate
the specific risks. The primary strategy used to reduce Ocean
Rigs financial market risks is the use of derivative
financial instruments where appropriate. Derivatives are used
periodically in order to hedge Ocean Rigs ongoing
operational exposures as well as transaction-specific exposures.
When the use of derivatives is deemed appropriate, only
conventional derivative instruments are used. These may include
interest rate swaps, forward contracts and options.
It is Ocean Rigs policy to enter into derivative financial
instruments only with highly rated financial institutions. Ocean
Rig uses derivatives only for the purposes of managing risks
associated with interest rate and currency exposure.
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably
possible change in the U.S. Dollar exchange rate, with all
other variables held constant, of Ocean Rigs profit before
tax and its equity (due to changes in the fair value of
financial instruments).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on Profit
|
|
Effect
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Decrease in
|
|
(in millions of
|
|
(in millions of
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars
|
|
U.S. Dollars)
|
|
U.S. Dollars)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
+10
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2010
|
|
|
−10
|
%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
2009
|
|
|
+10
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
2009
|
|
|
−10
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2008
|
|
|
+20
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2008
|
|
|
−20
|
%
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
At December 31, 2010, after taking into account the effect
the interest swaps that qualify for hedge accounting,
approximately 75% of Ocean Rigs loans have fixed interest
rate (2009: 54%, 2008: 45%). The following table demonstrates
the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in interest
rates, with all other variables held constant, of Ocean
Rigs profit before tax (through the impact on the floating
rate borrowings and interest swaps that do not qualify for hedge
accounting as per year end) and of Ocean Rigs equity
(through the impact on interest swaps that qualify for hedge
accounting as per year end).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on
|
|
Effect
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
Profit Before Tax
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Decrease in
|
|
(in millions of
|
|
(in millions of
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars
|
|
U.S. Dollars)
|
|
U.S. Dollars)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
2010
|
|
|
−100
|
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
2009
|
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
2009
|
|
|
−100
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
2008
|
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
2008
|
|
|
−100
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
(27.1
|
)
|
129
THE
OFFSHORE DRILLING INDUSTRY
All of the information and data presented in this section has
been provided by Fearnley Offshore AS. Fearnley Offshore AS has
advised that the statistical and graphical information contained
herein is drawn from its database and other sources. In
connection therewith, Fearnley Offshore AS has advised that:
(a) certain information in Fearnley Offshore ASs
database is derived from estimates or subjective judgments;
(b) the information in the databases of other offshore
drilling data collection agencies may differ from the
information in Fearnley Offshores database; (c) while
Fearnley Offshore AS has taken reasonable care in the
compilation of the statistical and graphical information and
believes it to be accurate and correct, data compilation is
subject to limited audit and validation procedures.
Summary
The international offshore drilling market has seen an increased
trend towards deepwater and ultra deepwater exploration and
subsequent development drilling. Due to the BP Macondo/Deepwater
Horizon incident, there will be an increased focus on technical
and operational issues and the inherent risk of developing
offshore fields in ultra deepwater. This may result in the
expectation that oil companies will show a higher preference for
modern, more technologically advanced units capable of drilling
in these environments. Given the increasingly ageing floater
fleet, Fearnley Offshore AS believes a sustained demand in the
market in the longer term will result in the need for
replacements.
Fearnley Offshore AS foresees an increase of drilling activity
in the medium to long term, from mid/end 2011 and onwards,
possibly eliminating the gap between supply and demand in the
ultra deepwater market. Such increased activity and balance in
the supply and demand picture will result in higher dayrates.
This is based on the assumption that the oil price is maintained
above $70 per barrel.
Since the drilling moratorium in the US Gulf of Mexico ended in
October 2010, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation
and Enforcement (BOEMRE) has been granting permits with all of
the 18 post-moratorium permits issued in 2011. The halt in all
drilling operations due to the moratorium has postponed more
than 30 rig-years of planned activity. During the moratorium,
nine rigs left the US Gulf of Mexico with only three currently
slated to return. Approximately 50% of the 26 deepwater rigs on
contract in the US Gulf of Mexico are currently operating while
the rest are waiting for permits. A further two deepwater rigs
are stacked in the Gulf. Fearnley Offshore AS expects that
further permits will be granted, however it could be 2012 before
all the units on contract are back in operating mode.
Fearnley Offshore AS foresees that tightening of regulatory
regimes will occur especially in the US Gulf of Mexico, but
these changes may also be implemented across the industry
globally. More controls and systems will be implemented to
ensure safer operations, and better plans and responses to
accidents must be developed. In the longer term, this could
prove to be an advantage for owners of the newest and best
equipped units in the ultra deepwater market segment. Fearnley
Offshore AS expects the implementation of stricter rules,
regulations and requirements for safer well design and
engineering and, therefore, higher technical requirements and
procedures for the drilling units and contractors. As a result,
wells will be more work intensive, thus necessitating more rig
time.
Oil &
Gas Fundamentals
Oil
Price and Consumption
Exploration and production (E&P) spending by
oil and gas companies generally creates the demand for oil
service companies, of which offshore drilling contracting is a
significant part.
Global E&P spending is now forecasted to increase
substantially in 2011, as compared to the increase in 2010 and
the increase is expected to be driven by the six super majors;
BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Shell and Total. All
the big groups are expected to produce strong results due to the
current high oil price. The increase is mainly due to spending
gains in Latin America, the Middle East, West Africa and
Southeast Asia to boost production growth and further capitalize
on high crude prices.
130
In Latin/South America, PEMEX and Petrobras are also expected to
drive the E&P spending, and Petrobras will significantly
expand their deepwater activity with the development of its
several new large offshore fields off Brazil.
There is a strong relationship between E&P spending and oil
companies earnings, where the oil price is the most
important parameter. Fearnley Offshore AS therefore believes
that the determining factor influencing the demand for drilling
units going forward is the price of oil. Since 2007, the price
of oil has been highly volatile, reaching a peak of $147 per
barrel in July 2008 and a low of $40 per barrel in January 2009.
Over the past 12 months the price of oil stayed at levels
above $70 per barrel, with the current Brent blend oil price
trading around $110 per barrel.
Though a lower oil price can temporarily discourage exploration
and development drilling, it is generally acknowledged that oil
consumption will continue to grow for many decades to come based
on increasing demand from developing countries. The changing
dynamics of demand, such as stagnating growth in developed
countries, rate of field decline, and the changing nature of the
worlds oil reserves, quality, area of origin, refinery
capability and ownership, will all affect the price of oil and
gas.
The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects a
tightening of the world oil markets over the next two years and
consumption is expected to grow by an annual average of
1.5 million barrels per day (bbl/d) through 2012. The EIA
expects the growth in supply from non OPEC countries to average
less than 0.1 million bbl/d each year in 2011 and 2012 and
the market will rely on both inventories and significant
increases in production of crude oil within OPEC member
countries to meet world demand growth. Maturing fields in
countries such as UK, Norway
131
and Mexico are causing production declines at a rate around 4-6%
per year for these countries and oil companies need to develop
fields discovered over the last few years and explore in new
areas to replace depleting reserves.
source: OECD/IEA - 2008/2010
The graph above shows the International Energy Agencys
(IEA) forecast from 2008 (the latest comprehensive forecast
available) for world oil & gas supply and consumption.
In the total consumption forecast, the IEA anticipates an
increase in oil consumption going forward. This should encourage
oil companies to engage in further exploration and development
to meet the increasing global demand for oil. It should be
noted, however, that there is a significant time gap between the
oil companies commitment to secure rig time and the actual
production of oil and gas. It should also be noted that most of
recent major new discoveries of offshore oil and gas are in deep
waters and in deep structure, which are rig-intensive, and will
likely need more rig time per produced barrel than more
traditional developments onshore or in shallow and non-harsh
waters
Rig
Market Fundamentals
The worldwide fleet of mobile offshore drilling rigs today
totals 663 units. Of these, 408 are
Jack-up
rigs, 192 are Semi-submersible rigs and 63 are Drillships. With
522 of these employed as of July 2011, the fleet utilization is
79%. However, the effective utilization for the mobile drilling
rigs being marketed is 90%, as 86 units remain cold-stacked
while the remaining number of unemployed units are either at
shipyard for repairment/upgrade/classing, warm stacked/idle or
are en-route between contracts.
Jack-up
rigs
Jack-up rigs
are mobile, bottom-supported self-elevating drilling platforms
that stand on three or four legs on the seabed. When the rig is
to move from one location to another, it will jack its platform
down on the water until it floats, and will then be towed by a
supply vessel or similar to its next location, where it will
lower the legs to the sea bottom and elevate the platform above
sea level. A modern
Jack-up rig
will normally have the ability to move its drill floor aft of
its own hull (cantilever), so that multiple wells can be drilled
at open water locations or over wellhead platforms without
re-positioning the rig. The general water depth capability of a
Jack-up rig
is 300-375
feet, while premium
Jack-up rigs
have operational capabilities enabling them to work in water
depths in excess of 400 ft.
132
Semi-submersible
rigs
Semi-submersible rigs are floating platforms, with columns and
pontoons and feature a ballasting system that can vary the draft
of the partially submerged hull from a shallow transit draft, to
a predetermined operational
and/or
survival draft
(50-80 feet)
when drilling operations are underway at a well location. This
reduces the rigs exposure to weather and ocean conditions
(waves, winds, and currents) and increases its stability.
Semi-submersible rigs maintain their position above the wellhead
either by means of a conventional mooring system, consisting of
anchors and chains
and/or
cables, or by a computerized dynamic positioning (DP) system.
Propulsion capabilities of Semi-submersible rigs range from
having no propulsion capability or propulsion assistance (and
thereby requiring the use of supply vessel or similar for
transits between locations) through to self-propelled whereby
the rig has the ability to relocate independently of a towing
vessel.
Drillships
Drillships are ships with on-board propulsion machinery, often
constructed for drilling in deep water. They are based on
conventional ship hulls, but have certain modifications.
Drilling operations are conducted through openings in the hull
(moon pools). Drillships normally have a higher load
capacity than semi-submersible rigs and are well suited to
offshore drilling in remote areas due to their mobility and high
load capacity. Like semi-submersible rigs, drillships can be
equipped with conventional mooring systems or DP systems.
The Semi-submersible rigs and Drillships are often categorized
collectively as Floaters.
The
Jack-Up
Market
The total jackup fleet currently has 408 units in
operation/available in the market with 59 more units under
construction. Since the beginning of 2006, 95 newbuild jackups
have been delivered. These new units, along with those still
under construction, are mainly what Fearnley Offshore AS
describes as Special Capability Jackups (SCJU) i.e. larger
jackups with
Þ=300ft
water depth capability, 30,000ft drilling depth capability, 3
mud pumps and
Þ=1,500
kips hook load.
As jackups contract lead time (time from contracting to
anticipated commencement) is generally short and units often are
on short contracts, they are easier for operators to let go of
and are more sensitive towards market fluctuations than, for
example, deepwater floaters.
Worldwide
Jack-up
Market
In 2004, contractors realized that demand for jackups was
increasing and that the age structure of the existing fleet was
old and getting technically obsolete for many of the new market
plays. However, generally risk adverse established contractors
were not willing to order newbuilds, nor were operators willing
to assist contractors ordering newbuilds on contract. This
situation resented opportunities for new investors who saw to
profit from taking on yard risk and, based on the belief that
the existing old units would be obsolete in the near future. As
the early newbuilds under construction obtained contracts with
favorable day rates, other orders followed and a newbuilding
boom began.
Until recently, and as with all other segments in the mobile
offshore drilling market, jackups have enjoyed a relatively high
utilization during the last several years hovering between 90
and 100%. During the same period, there has also been a
geographical shift in the market for jackups. A combination of
low gas prices and increased operating costs linked to higher
insurance fees in US Gulf of Mexico led to units leaving the US
Gulf of Mexico market for other areas, a move which allowed for
higher rates and longer contract terms in general. The booming
economy in Eastern Hemisphere countries, combined with their
desire to create a viable energy market of their own,
133
resulted in increasing demand for jackups in this area. Due to
gas being the main source of energy, the earlier described
Special Capability Jackups (SCJU) were the preferred type of
units.
134
As illustrated by the following graph, worldwide active
utilization is currently 81% . Units located in Gulf of Mexico
account for the majority of this decline as only 50 of
105 units currently are on contract in this area.
At present, the SCJU fleet consists of 122 units with 52
more to be delivered from yard within mid 2014.
Based on the expectations for increased activity, 46 new units
have been ordered for delivery in 2012, 2013 and 2014 (see table
below for current order book).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
Contractor
|
|
Unit
|
|
Yard
|
|
Delivery
|
|
1 Rowan
|
|
Rowan Norway
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jul-11
|
|
2 Seadrill
|
|
West Elara
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Jul-11
|
|
3 Swecomex
|
|
Independencia 1
|
|
Operadora Cicsa
|
|
|
Jul-11
|
|
4 Rowan
|
|
Joe Douglas
|
|
LeTourneau
|
|
|
Sep-11
|
|
5 Great Offshore
|
|
JU V351
|
|
Bharati
|
|
|
Sep-11
|
|
6 Transocean
|
|
Transocean Honor
|
|
PPL
|
|
|
Nov-11
|
|
7 Rowan
|
|
Rowan EXL 4
|
|
AMFELS
|
|
|
Nov-11
|
|
8 PV Drilling
|
|
PV Drill 4
|
|
PV Shipyard
|
|
|
Dec-11
|
|
9 NDC Abu Dhabi
|
|
NDC Abu Dhabi TBA 1
|
|
Lamprell, UAE
|
|
|
Feb-12
|
|
10 Essar
|
|
Essar 1
|
|
AGB Shipyard
|
|
|
Apr-12
|
|
11 Standard Drilling
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 1
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jul-12
|
|
12 NDC Abu Dhabi
|
|
NDC Abu Dhabi TBA 2
|
|
Lamprell, UAE
|
|
|
Aug-12
|
|
13 Essar
|
|
Essar 2
|
|
AGB Shipyard
|
|
|
Aug-12
|
|
14 Atwood
|
|
Atwood Mako
|
|
PPL
|
|
|
Sep-12
|
|
15 Saudi Aramco
|
|
Saudi Aramco TBA
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Oct-12
|
|
16 Transocean
|
|
Transocean TBA 2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Nov-12
|
|
17 Transocean
|
|
Transocean TBA 3
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Nov-12
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
Contractor
|
|
Unit
|
|
Yard
|
|
Delivery
|
|
18 Prospector
|
|
POD TBA I
|
|
Dalian
|
|
|
Nov-12
|
|
19 Jasper
|
|
Jasper TBA I
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Nov-12
|
|
20 Noble
|
|
Noble TBA 1
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Dec-12
|
|
21 Atwood
|
|
Atwood Manta
|
|
PPL
|
|
|
Dec-12
|
|
22 Seadrill
|
|
West Castor
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Dec-12
|
|
23 Seadrill
|
|
West Telesto
|
|
Dalian
|
|
|
Dec-12
|
|
24 Mermaid Drilling
|
|
Mermaid TBA 1
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Dec-12
|
|
25 Greatship
|
|
Greatship TBA
|
|
Lamprell, UAE
|
|
|
Dec-12
|
|
26 Dynamic Drilling
|
|
Dynamic Drilling TBA
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Feb-13
|
|
27 Standard Drilling
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
28 Noble
|
|
Noble TBA 2
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
29 Seadrill
|
|
West Tucana
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
30 Prospector
|
|
POD TBA II
|
|
Dalian
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
31 Seadrill
|
|
West Oberon
|
|
Dalian
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
32 Mermaid Drilling
|
|
Mermaid TBA 2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
33 Perforadora Central
|
|
Perforadora Central TBA
|
|
AMFELS
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
34 Japan Drilling Company
|
|
JDC TBA
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Mar-13
|
|
35 Discovery Offshore
|
|
Discovery Offshore TBA 1
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Apr-13
|
|
36 Atwood
|
|
Atwood Orca
|
|
PPL
|
|
|
Jun-13
|
|
37 Clearwater
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 3
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jun-13
|
|
38 Ensco
|
|
Ensco TBA1
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jun-13
|
|
39 Jasper
|
|
Jasper TBA II
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jun-13
|
|
40 Standard Drilling
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 4
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jul-13
|
|
41 Noble
|
|
Noble TBA 3
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Sep-13
|
|
42 Seadrill
|
|
West CJ70 TBN
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Sep-13
|
|
43 Prospector
|
|
POD TBA III
|
|
Dalian
|
|
|
Sep-13
|
|
44 Prospector
|
|
POD TBA IV
|
|
Dalian
|
|
|
Sep-13
|
|
45 Gulf Drilling International
|
|
GDI TBA 1
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Sep-13
|
|
46 Discovery Offshore
|
|
Discovery Offshore TBA 2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Oct-13
|
|
47 Standard Drilling
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 5
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Nov-13
|
|
48 Ensco
|
|
Ensco TBA2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Dec-13
|
|
49 Standard Drilling
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 6
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Dec-13
|
|
50 Maersk Contractors
|
|
Maersk TBA 1
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Dec-13
|
|
51 Noble
|
|
Noble TBA 4
|
|
Jurong
|
|
|
Mar-14
|
|
52 Standard Drilling
|
|
Standard Drilling TBA 7
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
May-14
|
|
53 Maersk Contractors
|
|
Maersk TBA 2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Jul-14
|
|
54 Gulf Drilling International
|
|
GDI TBA 2
|
|
KFELS
|
|
|
Sep-14
|
|
136
The
Floater Market
The total existing fleet of floaters includes 192
Semi-submersible rigs and 63 Drillships.
As can be seen from the above graph, there is almost full
utilization for the floater market. Fearnley Offshore AS notes
that reduced demand can be attributed to the lower activity in
the shallow market segment.
Generations
The Floater fleet is often divided into generations; basically
referring to the period in which the rigs were built. There are
so called
2nd,
3rd,
4th,
5th and
6th
generation floaters.
The 2nd
generation consists primarily of semi-submersible rigs built in
the seventies, an enhancement of the 1st generation Gulf of
Mexico semi. The
3rd
generation was created based on the experience drawn from the
2nd generation with better capacities, all built in the early
eighties. A small number of 4th generation floaters were built
in mid eighties, which focused more on operation in even harsher
environment and arctic conditions.
The next generation
(5th) was
launched in 1996. These units focused on working in deep water.
Including conversions, 46 units were delivered between 1998
and 2005, representing roughly 20% of the total floater fleet
today. Out of these, 24 are defined as 5th generation units
capable of working in water depths of 7,500 feet or deeper.
The remaining units are mainly older units having been fully
refurbished and some newbuilds with less advanced capabilities.
Since October 2010, a total of 28 floaters have been ordered,
scheduled for delivery in 2012, 2013 and 2014. Taking these
orders together with the previously existing orders, there are
now 67 new units on order. Current newbuild orderbook thus
represents approximately 25% of the total floater fleet 63 of
the ordered units are ultra deepwater rigs capable of drilling
at 7,500 feet or deeper. There are currently several other
newbuilding projects under consideration and it is likely that
the newbuilding activity will continue, although available yard
capacity is
137
scarce and new orders, beyond current newbuild options, will
probably be scheduled for 2014 delivery (see table below for
current order book).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
#
|
|
Owner
|
|
Unit
|
|
Yard
|
|
Delivery
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Seadrill
|
|
West Pegasus
|
|
Vyborg/Jurong
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Schahin
|
|
Schahin TBA 1
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Gazflot
|
|
Severnoye Siyanie
|
|
Vyborg/Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Noble
|
|
Noble Bully 1
|
|
COSCO/Keppel
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
CNOOC
|
|
Hai Yang Shi You 981
|
|
Shanghai Waigaoqiao
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Delba Perforadora
|
|
Delba III
|
|
GPC, Abu Dhabi
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Songa
|
|
Songa Eclipse
|
|
Jurong
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Ensco
|
|
Ensco 8504
|
|
KFELS
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Odebrecht
|
|
Norbe VIII
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
OCR
|
|
Ocean Rig Poseidon
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Pacific Drilling
|
|
Pacific Santa Ana
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Vantage
|
|
Dragon Quest
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Saipem
|
|
Scarabeo 9
|
|
Yantai Raffles/KFELS
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
OCR
|
|
Ocean Rig Mykonos
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
La Muralla IV
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Saipem
|
|
Scarabeo 8
|
|
Severodvinsk/Fincantie
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Odfjell
|
|
Deepsea Metro 2
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Seadrill
|
|
West Leo
|
|
Sevmarsh/Jurong
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Stena
|
|
Stena IceMax
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Seadrill
|
|
West Capricorn
|
|
Jurong
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Noble
|
|
Noble Globetrotter 1
|
|
STX Dalian/Huisman
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
Pride
|
|
Deep Ocean Molokai
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Schahin
|
|
Schahin TBA 2
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
COSL Europe
|
|
COSLInnovator
|
|
Yantai Raffles
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
Noble
|
|
Noble Bully 2
|
|
COSCO/Keppel
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Petroserv
|
|
Carolina
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Ensco
|
|
Ensco 8505
|
|
KFELS
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Odebrecht
|
|
ODN-1
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Odebrecht
|
|
ODN-2
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Sevan Drilling
|
|
Sevan Brasil
|
|
Cosco Qidong Shipyar
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Etesco
|
|
Etesco TBA
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
COSL Europe
|
|
COSLPromoter
|
|
Yantai Raffles
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
MarAcc
|
|
Island Innovator
|
|
Cosco Zhoushan/Nym
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Ensco
|
|
Ensco 8506
|
|
KFELS
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Atw ood
|
|
Atw ood Condor
|
|
Jurong
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Petroserv
|
|
Catarina
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Queiroz Galvao
|
|
QG TBA I
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Queiroz Galvao
|
|
QG TBA II
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
DVB Bank
|
|
Dalian Developer
|
|
COSCO Dalian
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Seadrill
|
|
West Auriga
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Pacific Drilling
|
|
Pacific Khamsin
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Vantage
|
|
Tungsten Explorer
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
#
|
|
Owner
|
|
Unit
|
|
Yard
|
|
Delivery
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Seadrill
|
|
West Vela
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Pride
|
|
Deep Ocean Marquesas
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Diamond
|
|
Ocean BlackHaw k
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Noble
|
|
Noble DS TBA I
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
OCR
|
|
Ocean Rig DS TBA I
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Noble
|
|
Noble Globetrotter 2
|
|
STX Dalian/Huisman
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Odebrecht
|
|
Odebrech DS 5
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Odebrecht
|
|
Odebrecht SS 1
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Atwood
|
|
Atw ood Advantage
|
|
DSME
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Pacific Drilling
|
|
Pacific Sharav
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Maersk Drilling
|
|
Maersk DS TBA 1
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
OCR
|
|
Ocean Rig DS TBA II
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Seadrill
|
|
West Tellus
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
FOE
|
|
FOE DS TBA I
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Row an
|
|
Row an DS TBA 1
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Noble
|
|
Noble DS TBA II
|
|
Hyundai
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Shallow
and deep water
As discussed above, the floater market is also broken down by
water depth capability in the following manner:
|
|
|
Shallow Water Drilling Rigs
|
|
<3000 ft (915m) water depth
|
Deepwater Drilling Rigs
|
|
>3000ft (915m) water depth
|
Ultra Deepwater Drilling Rigs
|
|
>7500ft (2286 m) water depth
|
The breakdown of the floater market is further divided between
drillships and semi-submersibles, where Fearnley Offshore AS
notes that the focus from both contractors and operators in the
last market upturn was towards ultra deepwater drilling.
Worldwide
Shallow Water Market
After a strong recovery of the global drilling market in 2004,
the shallow water floater fleet experienced close to full
effective utilization from 2005 until the last quarter of 2008.
This fleet consists of just over 90 units, although some
units have been upgraded to deepwater capacity and will leave
the segment. The shallow water fleet will see the addition of
newbuilds scheduled for delivery during 2011 and 2012, but these
newbuilds are units designed for harsh environment; for
operation in the North Sea including the Norwegian Continental
Shelf.
The shallow water fleet is relatively old, with a large number
of units constructed in the mid 1970s and 1980s. Many of these
units will need considerable investments to maintain and renew
their class and enhance their life expectancy over the next
several years. Substantial investments may be postponed until
new contracts have been secured, and units will be stacked or
even retired from the active fleet. With a theoretical average
technical life expectancy of 35 years, 63 units could
potentially be retired from the active fleet by the end of 2013
should the
139
drilling contractors not see possibilities of charter contracts
justifying life enhancing upgrades. Please see the graph below.
The above graph shows historical supply and demand and future
supply for all floaters (both shallow and deepwater floaters).
The grey line shows theoretical future supply assuming all
drilling units older than 35 years leave the active market
(by being scrapped, cold stacked or converted into a
non-drilling unit). Most of these units are in the shallow water
category.
The average age of the existing floater fleet today is
21 years. However, none of the competitive floaters have
been retired during the last 5 years due to the strong
market conditions, which have provided sufficient earnings to
maintain and upgrade the older units. In the preceding period
(1995-2005),
the average age of units being retired from the fleet was
21.5 years.
It is also noteworthy that the shallow water floater market has
a scattered ownership structure, which makes market discipline
more difficult, and some of the smaller contractors will strive
to maintain high utilization levels. This is resulting in a
downward pressure on dayrates in such an unbalanced market,
where the supply is greater than demand in the short term.
The
Deepwater Floater Market
This market has proven less susceptible to volatility in the
market than the
jack-up and
shallow water floater segments.
63 deepwater floaters are currently under construction for
delivery between now and mid 2014. Notably, only one of these
units under construction is a moored unit and most have ultra
deepwater capability. Deepwater, more specifically ultra
deepwater, has been the major focus for operators in the last
upswing from 2005. Upon completion of the current order book,
the ultra deepwater fleet alone will consist of 147 rigs.
Dynamically- positioned drillships, as opposed to semi
submersibles, have seen a rise in popularity and represent over
half of the new construction.
In the deepwater market segment there are 75 existing units with
an average age of 24 years. For ultra deepwater units there
are 85 existing units at an average age of 7 years. For
drillships, the age profile is skewed
140
towards younger units, with 41 units in the ultra deepwater
category with an average age of 5 years. In light of the
Macondo/Deepwater Horizon accident, operators are showing a
preference for newer equipment. Given the ageing deepwater
fleet, Fearnley Offshore AS sees some oil companies contracting
ultra deepwater units even for their deepwater and shallow water
wells.
It is widely believed that the more easily extractable oil
fields in shallow water have been found, and that the activity
has moved towards deeper waters and, to a certain extent,
harsher environments. The shallow water still represents the
majority of the offshore drilling activity. However, the wells
in shallow water are maturing and reserves are being depleted
rapidly. New oil and gas production is more likely to be
developed in deeper waters.
Although fewer charter contracts have been entered into in the
deepwater market after the downturn at the end of 2008 compared
to before the downturn, the deepwater market has proven less
susceptible to fluctuations than the
jack-up and
shallow water floater segments. The deepwater market is
characterized by longer visibility with several long term
charters entered into.
Up until the recent financial turmoil, the deepwater floater
market experienced high levels of utilization and record-high
dayrates, in excess of $600,000 for some longer term contracts
in 2008, sparking an increase in newbuildings. At present, the
utilization for the deepwater market is approximately 94%. The
number of backlog months for deepwater contracts was at record
highs in 2009 at 702 rig years, however, this number decreased
over the past year to 618 rig years as of July 1, 2011.
Demand
During 2009, only 12 long term (longer than six months)
contracts were entered into in the deepwater market, compared to
57 such contracts during 2008. During 2010 and 2011, demand
recovered with 53 long term deepwater contracts having been
entered into.
With the current high oil price, there are numerous potential
fields worldwide that are considered economically viable.
However, due to the uncertain economic climate during the last
couple of years, oil companies have been
141
holding back on new investments and decision making has been
slow. However, with sustained high oil price, this trend is now
changing.
The above graph represents Fearnley Offshores forecasted
supply and demand for the deepwater fleet world-wide through
2012. The possible demand is based on a higher than 50%
probability, while the requirements has a 70% or higher
probability of being accomplished.
In the forecast model Fearnley Offshore AS has accounted for the
effect of the drilling ban in the US Gulf of Mexico by deferring
certain programs with expected startup from the middle to end of
2011.
Brazil is one of the most promising offshore deepwater drilling
regions, and Petrobras has high ambitions going forward. In
order to achieve its goal, Petrobras has been active in securing
ultra deepwater drilling capacity. However, with political
pressure for building up a national Brazilian oil service
industry, Petrobras is pushing forward with offshore drilling
units built in Brazil. The price and cost for such newbuilding
plans are significantly above current international market
levels, which is approximately $600-$650 million cost for
an ultra deepwater drillship. It is clear that Petrobras, with
their significant new fields to be developed, are potentially
short of high capability ultra deepwater floaters. Some may be
new constructions with
back-to-back
contracts, but as the most urgent need for additional units seem
to be in
2012-2013,
existing rigs will have to be the main consideration.
142
Supply
As of July 2011 there were 63 deepwater units under
construction, of which 62 are ultra deepwater units. Of these 62
newbuilds, 35 do not have a charter contract in place. When all
newbuilds are delivered the worldwide deepwater fleet will
consist of 223 competitive units, of which 147 will be rated for
ultra deepwater drilling.
143
The following graph shows the geographical areas were the
deepwater floaters are available and in operation, where Brazil
is now the dominant area in which almost one-third of the fleet
is operating.
144
The
Ultra Deepwater Floater Market
This market has enjoyed full utilization from 2005, however one
unit was available in West Africa in the first quarter of 2011.
Demand
The ultra deepwater market evolved with 5 years of
intensive exploration activity starting in 1999. Exploration
proved to be successful and resulted in significant projects
being materialized in this market. The majority of the ultra
deepwater units are now involved in development work. Many of
the recent long term contracts have been geared towards new
areas of exploration, and Fearnley Offshore AS foresees that
this will continue in years to come.
145
The ultra deepwater market still has a high backlog of
contracts, enjoying almost full utilization of the fleet. Within
the last 12 months, 27 long term charter contracts have
been entered into in the ultra deepwater market, compared to 6
and 13 charter contracts for the same period in the two previous
years, respectively.
The graph above shows that there is a limited availability of
units over the next year. Even though there are few new programs
added by independent and smaller operators, there are
substantial programs being planned by national oil companies
(particularly from Petrobras) and most of the major oil
companies (Chevron, Total and ExxonMobil). This could have a
positive effect on the market in 2011. Traditionally deepwater
activity has been seen in the following geographical regions:
West Africa, Brazil and Gulf of Mexico. A new positive shift in
this market is that there has been increased demand in all areas
worldwide, such as East Africa, Greenland, China, New Zealand,
Falkland and the Mediterranean. In addition some of the national
oil companies, primarily Petrobras, are struggling with severe
delays of scheduled newbuildings already committed for work,
which may impact their short to medium term requirements leading
to further demand.
Supply
Ultra Deepwater
Currently there are 44 semisubmersibles and 41 drillships
working in the ultra deepwater segment, with an additional 17
semis and 45 drillships under construction. Of the future fleet
of 147 units, almost 35% are contracted into 2015 and
beyond.
146
The ultra deepwater contract status through 2012 is presented in
the graph below.
Fearnley Offshore AS predicts a balanced market in 2011
and emphasizes that there is only 1 available rig year in 2011.
With approximately 52 operators active in the market segment,
the excess rig capacity could quickly disappear. However, oil
companies have implemented their drilling plans slowly, which
may defer the timing of their projects, which again will be
offset by the commissioning and delivery of the newbuildings.
Current
Dayrate Level
In 2008 the international offshore drilling industry experienced
record dayrates for the ultra deepwater floater fleet. There
have been 36 long term ultra deepwater fixtures since the last
record high fixture in October 2008. As seen from the graph
below, the ultra deepwater dayrate has come down from its peak
at $624,000/day to a level of $453,000/day. Though the rates in
the various deepwater segments have been almost parallel in the
past, operators see added value in newer and more capable units
with higher capacities for their deepwater requirements, both
for exploration (which is spreading to more remote areas and
deeper waters) and for technically challenging developments.
This trend is expected to become even more pronounced going
forward due to the Macondo
147
incident in the US Gulf of Mexico. Fearnley Offshore AS expects
the gap between the various segments to sustain or even increase.
Even after the recent US Gulf of Mexico incident, there has not
been any major deterioration in the dayrates obtained for new
contracts, although new contract lengths have been shorter. With
the price of oil remaining above $70 per barrel for a sustained
period, it is worthwhile to note that the rates for all
deepwater segments has flattened out and rates for the ultra
deepwater segments are trending upwards for the first time since
2008.
148
BUSINESS
Ocean
Rig
Ocean Rig is an international offshore drilling contractor
providing oilfield services for offshore oil and gas
exploration, development and production drilling and
specializing in the ultra-deepwater and harsh-environment
segment of the offshore drilling industry. Ocean Rig seeks to
utilize its high-specification drilling units to the maximum
extent of their technical capability and Ocean Rig believes that
it has earned a reputation for operating performance excellence.
Ocean Rig currently owns and operates two modern, fifth
generation ultra-deepwater semi-submersible offshore drilling
rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude, and
four sixth generation, advanced capability ultra-deepwater
drillships, the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, delivered in January 2011, March 2011, July 2011
and September 2011, respectively, by Samsung Heavy
Industries Co. Ltd., or Samsung.
Ocean Rig has additional newbuilding contracts with Samsung for
the construction of three seventh generation newbuilding
drillships, or its seventh generation hulls. These three
newbuilding drillships are currently scheduled for delivery in
July 2013, September 2013 and November 2013, respectively. The
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos are
sister-ships constructed by the same shipyard to the
same high-quality vessel design and specifications and are
capable of drilling in water depths of 10,000 feet. The
design of Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls reflects
additional enhancements that, with the purchase of additional
equipment, will enable the drillship to drill in water depths of
12,000 feet.
Ocean Rig also has options with Samsung for the construction of
up to three additional seventh generation ultra-deepwater
drillships at an estimated total project cost, excluding
financing costs, of $638.0 million per drillship, based on
a shipyard contract price of $570.0 million, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses of
$30.0 million. These options are exercisable by Ocean Rig
at any time on or prior to January 31, 2012.
Ocean Rig believes that the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos, as well as its three newbuilding
drillships, will be among the most technologically advanced
drillships in the world. The S10000E design, used for the
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos was
originally introduced in 1998 and according to Fearnley Offshore
AS, including these four drillships, a total of 45 drillships
have been ordered using this base design, which has been widely
accepted by customers, of which 24 had been delivered as of July
2011, including the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean
Rig Olympia. Among other technological enhancements, Ocean
Rigs drillships are equipped with dual activity drilling
technology, which involves two drilling systems using a single
derrick that permits two drilling-related operations to take
place simultaneously. Ocean Rig estimates this technology saves
between 15% and 40% in drilling time, depending on the well
parameters. Each of its newbuilding drillships will be capable
of drilling 40,000 feet at water depths of
12,000 feet. Ocean Rig currently has a team of its
employees at Samsung overseeing the construction of the three
newbuilding drillships to help ensure that those drillships are
built on time, to its exact vessel specifications and on budget,
as was the case for the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean
Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean
Rig Mykonos.
The total cost of construction and construction-related expenses
for the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos amounted to approximately $755.7 million,
$756.9 million, $791.8 million and
$784.4 million, respectively. Construction-related expenses
include equipment purchases, commissioning, supervision and
commissions to related parties, excluding financing costs and
fair value adjustments. As of September 30, 2011, Ocean Rig
had made an aggregate of $726.7 million of construction and
construction-related payments for its three seventh generation
hulls. Construction-related expenses include equipment
purchases, commissioning, supervision and commissions to related
parties, excluding financing costs and fair value adjustments.
As of
149
September 30, 2011, the remaining total construction and
construction-related payments for Ocean Rigs three seventh
generation hulls was approximately $1.2 billion in the
aggregate, consisting of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
NB #1 (TBN)
|
|
|
|
|
Construction payments
|
|
$
|
365.6
|
|
Other construction-related expenses (excluding financing costs)
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
NB #2 (TBN)
|
|
|
|
|
Construction payments
|
|
$
|
365.6
|
|
Other construction-related expenses (excluding financing costs)
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
NB #3 (TBN)
|
|
|
|
|
Construction payments
|
|
$
|
365.6
|
|
Other construction-related expenses (excluding financing costs)
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
Ocean Rigs revenue, EBITDA and net income for the
twelve-months ended June 30, 2011 was $452.4 million,
$242.2 million and $114.0 million, respectively. Ocean
Rig believes EBITDA provides useful information to investors
because it is a basis upon which Ocean Rig measures its
operations and efficiency. Please see Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial and Other Data of Ocean Rig for a
reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, the most directly
comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure.
History
of Ocean Rig
Ocean Rig is a corporation formed under the laws of the Marshall
Islands on December 10, 2007 under the name Primelead
Shareholders Inc. and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips.
DryShips is a global provider of marine transportation services
for drybulk cargoes and offshore contract drilling oil services.
DryShips owns approximately 75% of Ocean Rigs outstanding
common stock as of the date of this proxy statement /
prospectus. Ocean Rig acquired all of the outstanding shares of
Primelead Limited in December 2007.
Ocean Rigs predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, was incorporated on
September 26, 1996 under the laws of Norway and contracted
for the construction of Ocean Rigs two existing drilling
rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude, as
well as two other newbuilding drilling rigs that were
subsequently sold. The Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik
Raude commenced operations in 2001 and 2002, respectively,
under contracts with leading oil and gas companies. The shares
of Ocean Rig ASA traded on the Oslo Børs from January 1997
to July 2008.
Ocean Rigs wholly-owned subsidiary, Primelead Limited, a
corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus,
was formed on November 16, 2007 for the purpose of
acquiring shares of Ocean Rig ASA. On December 20, 2007,
Primelead Limited, acquired 51,778,647 shares, or
approximately 30.4% of the outstanding capital stock of Ocean
Rig ASA, following its nomination as a buyer from Cardiff Marine
Inc., or Cardiff, a company controlled by Mr. Economou,
Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
and the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent company. After acquiring more
than 33% of Ocean Rig ASAs outstanding shares on
April 22, 2008, Ocean Rig launched a mandatory offer for
the remaining shares of Ocean Rig ASA at a price of NOK45 per
share, or $8.89 per share, as required by Norwegian law. On
May 9, 2008, Ocean Rig concluded a guarantee facility of
NOK5.0 billion, or approximately $974.5 million, and a
senior secured term loan of $800.0 million in order to
guarantee the purchase price of the Ocean Rig ASA shares to be
acquired through the mandatory offer, to finance the acquisition
cost of the Ocean Rig ASA shares and to refinance existing debt.
Ocean Rig gained control over Ocean Rig ASA on May 14,
2008. The results of operations related to the acquisition are
included in Ocean Rigs consolidated financial statements
as of May 15, 2008. Ocean Rig held 100% of the shares of
Ocean Rig ASA, or 163.6 million shares, as of July 10,
2008, which Ocean Rig acquired at a total cost of
$1.4 billion. With respect to the transaction described
above, DryShips purchased 4.4% of the share capital of Ocean Rig
ASA from companies affiliated with Mr. Economou, the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of DryShips and
of Ocean Rig. On March 5, 2009, DryShips contributed all of
its equity interests in the newbuilding vessel-owning companies
of the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
to Ocean Rig. On May 15, 2009, Ocean Rig closed a
transaction to acquire the equity interests of the newbuilding
vessel-owning companies of the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Ocean Rig Olympia,
150
which were owned by clients of Cardiff, including certain
entities affiliated with Mr. Economou. As part of this
transaction, Ocean Rig assumed the liabilities for two
$115.0 million secured loan facilities, which were repaid
in connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig Corcovado
and the Ocean Rig Olympia. As consideration for the
acquisition of the newbuilding vessel-owning companies of the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia,
Ocean Rig issued to the sellers, including entities related to
Mr. Economou, a number of common shares equal to 25% of its
total issued and outstanding common shares as of May 15,
2009.
On July 15, 2009, DryShips acquired the remaining 25% of
Ocean Rigs total issued and outstanding capital stock from
the minority interests held by certain unrelated entities and
certain parties related to Mr. Economou. The consideration
paid for the 25% interest consisted of a one-time
$50.0 million cash payment and the issuance of DryShips
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with an aggregate face
value of $280.0 million. Following such acquisition, Ocean
Rig became a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips.
On December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig completed the sale of an
aggregate of 28,571,428 of Ocean Rigs common shares
(representing 22% of Ocean Rigs outstanding common stock)
in an offering made to both
non-United
States persons in Norway in reliance on Regulation S under
the Securities Act and to qualified institutional buyers in the
United States in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities
Act. Ocean Rig refers to this offering, which includes the sale
of 1,871,428 common shares pursuant to the managers
exercise of their option to purchase additional shares, as the
private offering. A company controlled by Ocean Rigs
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Economou, purchased 2,869,428 common shares, or 2.38%
of Ocean Rigs outstanding common shares, in the private
offering at the offering price of $17.50 per share. Ocean Rig
received approximately $488.3 million of net proceeds from
the private offering, of which it used $99.0 million to
purchase an option contract from DryShips, Ocean Rigs
parent company, for the construction of up to four additional
ultra-deepwater drillships as described below. Ocean Rig applied
the remaining proceeds to partially fund remaining installment
payments for its newbuilding drillships and for general
corporate purposes.
Recent
Developments
During April 2011, Ocean Rig borrowed an aggregate of
$48.1 million from DryShips through shareholder loans for
capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. On
April 20, 2011, these intercompany loans, along with
shareholder loans of $127.5 million that Ocean Rig borrowed
from DryShips in March 2011, were fully repaid.
On April 15, 2011, Ocean Rig held a special shareholders
meeting at which its shareholders approved proposals (i) to
adopt its second amended and restated articles of incorporation;
and (ii) to designate the class of each member of the board
of directors and related expiration of term of office.
On April 18, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an
$800 million senior secured term loan agreement to
partially finance the construction costs of the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia. On
April 20, 2011, Ocean Rig drew down the full amount of this
facility and prepaid its $325.0 million short-term loan
agreement.
On April 18, 2011, Ocean Rig exercised the first of its six
newbuilding drillship options under its option contract with
Samsung and, as a result, entered into a shipbuilding contract
for one of its seventh generation hulls and paid
$207.6 million to the shipyard on April 20, 2011.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an agreement with
the lenders under its two $562.5 million loan agreements,
or its two Deutsche Bank credit facilities, to restructure these
facilities. As a result of this restructuring: (i) the
maximum amount permitted to be drawn is reduced from
$562.5 million to $495.0 million under each facility;
(ii) in addition to the guarantee already provided by
DryShips, Ocean Rig provided an unlimited recourse guarantee
that includes certain financial covenants; and (iii) Ocean
Rig is permitted to draw under the facility with respect to the
Ocean Rig Poseidon based upon the employment of the
drillship under its drilling contract with Petrobras Tanzania,
and on April 27, 2010, the cash collateral deposited for
this vessel was released. On August 10, 2011, Ocean Rig
amended the terms of the credit facility for the construction of
the Ocean Rig Mykonos to allow for full drawdowns to
finance the remaining installment payments for this drillship
based on the Petrobras Brazil contract and on August 10,
2010, the cash collateral deposited for the drillship was
released. The amendment also requires that the Ocean Rig
Mykonos be re-employed under a contract acceptable to the
lenders meeting certain
151
minimum terms and dayrates at least six months, in lieu of
12 months, prior to the expiration of the Petrobras Brazil
contract. All other material terms of the credit facility were
unchanged.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig issued $500.0 million
aggregate principal amount of its 9.5% senior unsecured
notes due 2016 offered in a private placement. The net proceeds
of the offering of approximately $487.5 million are
expected to be used to finance Ocean Rigs newbuilding
drillships program and for general corporate purposes.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig exercised the second of its
six newbuilding drillship options under its option contract with
Samsung, and, as a result, entered into a shipbuilding contract
for the second of its seventh generation hulls and paid
$207.4 million to the shipyard on May 5, 2011.
On May 3, 2011, following the approval by Ocean Rigs
board of directors and shareholders, Ocean Rig amended and
restated its amended and restated articles of incorporation,
among other things, to increase Ocean Rigs authorized
share capital to 1,000,000,000 common shares and
500,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each with a par
value of $0.01 per share.
On May 5, 2011, Ocean Rig terminated its contract with
Borders & Southern for the Eirik Raude for
drilling operations offshore the Falkland Islands and entered
into a new contract with Borders & Southern for the
Leiv Eiriksson on the same terms as the original contract
for the Eirik Raude with exceptions for the fees payable
upon mobilization and demobilization and certain other terms
specific to the Leiv Eiriksson, including off-hire dates,
period surveys and technical specifications.
On May 16, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an addendum to its
option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which Samsung granted
Ocean Rig the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, for a total of up to six
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to its drillships and Ocean Rigs
seventh generation hulls, with certain upgrades to vessel design
and specifications. Pursuant to the addendum, the two additional
newbuilding drillship options and the remaining drillship option
under the original contract may be exercised at any time on or
prior to January 31, 2012.
On May 19, 2011, Borders & Southern exercised its
option to drill an additional two wells under its contract with
Ocean Rig for the Leiv Eiriksson. Borders &
Southern assigned the two optional wells to Falkland Oil and
Gas. The maximum operating dayrate under the contract, which was
originally $540,000, decreased to $530,000 as a result of the
exercise of the optional wells. Borders & Southern has
a further option under the contract to drill a fifth well, for
which, if exercised, the dayrate would be $540,000.
On May 20, 2011, Ocean Rig paid $10.0 million to
Samsung in exchange for Samsungs agreement to deliver the
third optional newbuilding drillship by November 2013 if Ocean
Rig exercises its option to construct the drillship by
November 22, 2011, under Ocean Rigs contract with
Samsung.
On June 23, 2011, Ocean Rig exercised the third of six
newbuilding drillship options under its option contract with
Samsung and, as a result, entered into a shipbuilding contract
for the third of Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls and
paid $207.4 million to the shipyard.
On July 20, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into contracts with
Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos for drilling operations offshore
Brazil. The term of each contract is 1,095 days, with a
total combined value of $1.1 billion. The contract for the
Ocean Rig Mykonos is scheduled to commence in the fourth
quarter of 2011, and the contract for the Ocean Rig Corcovado
is scheduled to commence upon the expiration of the
drillships current contract with Cairn.
On July 26, 2011, DryShips and OceanFreight, entered into a
definitive agreement for DryShips to acquire the outstanding
shares of OceanFreight for consideration per share of $19.85,
consisting of $11.25 in cash and 0.52326 of a share of common
stock of Ocean Rig. The Ocean Rig common shares that will be
received by the OceanFreight shareholders will be from currently
outstanding shares held by DryShips. Based on the July 25,
2011 closing price of NOK89.00 ($16.44) for the common shares of
Ocean Rig on the Norwegian OTC market, the transaction
consideration reflects a total equity value for OceanFreight of
approximately $118 million and a total enterprise value of
approximately $239 million, including the assumption of
debt. The transaction has been approved by the boards of
directors of DryShips and OceanFreight, by the audit committee
of the board of directors of DryShips, which negotiated the
proposed transaction on behalf of DryShips, and by a special
committee of independent
152
directors of OceanFreight established to negotiate the proposed
transaction on behalf of OceanFreight. The shareholders of
OceanFreight, other than entities controlled by
Mr. Kandylidis, the Chief Executive Officer of
OceanFreight, will receive the consideration for their shares
pursuant to a merger of OceanFreight with a subsidiary of
DryShips. The merger is expected to close in the fourth quarter
of 2011. Simultaneously with the execution of the definitive
merger agreement described above, DryShips, entities controlled
by Mr. Kandylidis and OceanFreight, entered into a separate
purchase agreement. Under this agreement, DryShips acquired from
the entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis all their
OceanFreight shares, representing a majority of the outstanding
shares of OceanFreight, for the same consideration per share
that the OceanFreight shareholders will receive in the merger.
This acquisition closed on August 24, 2011. DryShips has
committed to vote the OceanFreight shares it acquired in favor
of the merger, which requires approval by a majority vote.
Mr. Kandylidis is the son of one of the directors of
DryShips and the nephew of Mr. George Economou. The Ocean
Rig shares paid by DryShips to the entities controlled by
Mr. Kandylidis are subject to a six-month
lock-up
period.
On July 28, 2011, Ocean Rig took delivery of its
newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the third
of its four sixth-generation, advanced capability
ultra-deepwater sister drillships that were constructed by
Samsung. In connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig
Poseidon, the final yard installment of $309.3 million
was paid, which was financed with additional drawdowns in July
2011 under the Deutsche Bank credit facility for the
construction of the Ocean Rig Poseidon totaling
$308.2 million.
On August 26, 2011, Ocean Rig commenced an offer to
exchange up to 28,571,428 shares of its new common stock
that have been registered under the Securities Act, pursuant to
a registration statement on Form F-4 (Registration No.
333-175940), or the Exchange Shares, for an equivalent number of
its common shares previously sold in a private offering in
December 2010, or the Original Shares. On September 29,
2011, an aggregate of 28,505,786 common shares were exchanged in
the Exchange Offer.
On September 12, 2011, Ocean Rig appointed a new
independent director, Mr. Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis, to
its board of directors to fill the vacancy resulting from the
resignation of Mr. Pankaj Khanna as a director. On the same
date, the Ocean Rig board of directors approved other changes to
Ocean Rigs corporate governance in connection with the
application to list Ocean Rigs common shares on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. Specifically, the Ocean Rig board of
directors approved (1) an increase in the size of the audit
committee to three members; (2) the establishment of a
compensation committee comprised of independent directors;
(3) the establishment of a nominating and corporate
governance committee comprised of independent directors;
(4) the adoption of written committee charters for each of
the audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance
committees; and (5) the adoption of a Code of Ethics that
applies to all officers, directors and employees of Ocean Rig.
The Ocean Rig board of directors has determined that each of
Mr. Akis Tsirgakis, Mr. Trygve Arnesen and
Mr. Michael Gregos are independent under the rules of the
Nasdaq Stock Market.
On September 30, 2011, Ocean Rig took delivery of its
newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Mykonos, the fourth
of its four sixth-generation, advanced capability
ultra-deepwater sister drillships that were constructed by
Samsung. In connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, the final yard installment of $305.7 million was
paid, which was financed with additional drawdowns in September
2011 under the Deutsche Bank credit facility for the
construction of the Ocean Rig Mykonos totaling
$277.6 million.
On October 5, 2011, DryShips completed the partial spin off
of Ocean Rig by distributing an aggregate of 2,967,291 common
shares of Ocean Rig, after giving effect to the treatment of
fractional shares, on a pro rata basis to DryShips
shareholders as of the record date of September 21, 2011,
or the Spin Off. In lieu of fractional shares, DryShips
transfer agent aggregated all fractional shares that would
otherwise be distributable to DryShips shareholders and
sold a total of 105 common shares on behalf of those
shareholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a
fractional share of Ocean Rig. Following the distribution, each
such shareholder received a cash payment in an amount equal to
its pro rata share of the total net proceeds of the sale of
fractional shares.
Ocean Rig has been advised that DryShips completed the Spin Off
in order to satisfy the initial listing criteria of the NASDAQ
Global Select Market, which require that Ocean Rig have a
minimum number of round lot shareholders (shareholders who own
100 or more shares), and thereby increase the liquidity of its
shares of common stock. Ocean Rig believes that listing its
shares of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and
thereby increasing the liquidity of its shares of common stock
will benefit its shareholders by improving the ability
153
of its shareholders to monetize their investment by selling its
common shares, reduce volatility in the market price of its
common shares, enhance its ability to access the capital markets
and increase the likelihood of attracting coverage by research
analysts which, in turn, would provide additional information to
shareholders upon which to base an investment decision. In
connection with the Spin Off, Ocean Rig applied to have its
common shares listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market and on September 19, 2011, Ocean Rigs common
shares commenced when issued trading on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the ticker symbol ORIGV.
Ocean Rigs common shares commenced regular way
trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker
symbol ORIG on October 6, 2011, the next
trading day after the distribution date for the Spin Off of
October 5, 2011.
On October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into drilling contracts
for the Eirik Raude for three additional wells offshore of West
Africa, with two independent oil operators based in the United
Kingdom and the United States. The total revenue backlog,
excluding mobilization cost, to complete the three wells program
is estimated at $96 million for a period of approximately 175
days. The new contracts are expected to commence after
completion of the existing Tullow Oil contract around
mid-October.
Ocean
Rigs Fleet
Set forth below is summary information concerning Ocean
Rigs offshore drilling units as of September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled
|
|
Water
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery/
|
|
Depth to the
|
|
|
Depth to the
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling
|
Unit
|
|
Generation
|
|
Wellhead(ft)
|
|
|
Oil Field(ft)
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
Term
|
|
Dayrate
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Existing Drilling Rigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leiv
|
|
2001/5th
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
Cairn Energy plc
|
|
Q2 2011 Q4 2011
|
|
$
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
Greenland
|
Eiriksson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borders &
Southern plc
|
|
Q4 2011 Q2 2012
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
|
Falkland Islands
|
Eirik Raude
|
|
2002/5th
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
Tullow Oil plc
|
|
Q4 2008 Q4 2011(B)
|
|
$
|
665,000
|
|
|
|
Ghana
|
Existing Drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig Corcovado (A)
|
|
2011/6th
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Cairn
Energy plc
|
|
Q1 2011 Q4 2011
|
|
$
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
Greenland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.
|
|
Q4 2011 Q4 2014
|
|
$
|
460,000
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
Ocean Rig Olympia (A)
|
|
2011/6th
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Vanco Cote
dIvoire Ltd. and
Vanco Ghana Ltd.
|
|
Q2 2011 Q2 2012
|
|
$
|
415,000
|
|
|
|
West Africa
|
Ocean Rig Poseidon (A)
|
|
2011/6th
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Petrobras
Tanzania Limited
|
|
Q3 2011 Q1 2013
|
|
$
|
632,000
|
|
*
|
|
Tanzania and
West Africa
|
Ocean Rig Mykonos (A)
|
|
2011/6th
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.
|
|
Q4 2011 Q4 2014
|
|
$
|
455,000
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
Newbuilding Drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB #1 (TBN) (A)
|
|
Q3 2013/ 7th
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB #2 (TBN) (A)
|
|
Q3 2013/7th
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB #3 (TBN) (A)
|
|
Q4 2013/7th
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional Newbuilding Drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB Option #1 (A)
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB Option #2 (A)
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB Option #3 (A)
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents sister ship vessels built to the same or
similar design and specifications. |
|
(B) |
|
On October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into drilling contracts
for the Eirik Raude with two independent oil operators based in
the United Kingdom and the United States that are expected to
commence after completion of the existing Tullow Oil contract
around mid-October. |
|
* |
|
Maximum Dayrate |
Employment
of Ocean Rigs Fleet
In April 2011, the Leiv Eiriksson commenced a contract
with a term of approximately six months with Cairn Energy plc,
or Cairn, for drilling operations in Greenland at a maximum
operating dayrate of $560,000 and a mobilization fee of
$7.0 million plus fuel costs. The contract is scheduled to
expire on October 31, 2011, subject to Ocean Rigs
customers option to extend the contract period through
November 30, 2011. Following the expiration of its contract
with Cairn, the Leiv Eiriksson is scheduled to commence a
contract with Borders & Southern for drilling
operations offshore the Falkland Islands at a maximum operating
dayrate of $530,000 and a $3.0 million fee
154
payable upon commencement of mobilization as well as
mobilization and demobilization fees, including fuel costs, of
$15.4 million and $12.6 million, respectively. The
contract was originally a two-well program at a maximum dayrate
of $540,000; however, on May 19, 2011, Borders &
Southern exercised its option to extend the contract to drill an
additional two wells, which it assigned to Falkland Oil and Gas
Limited, or Falkland Oil and Gas, and the maximum dayrate
decreased to $530,000. Borders & Southern has the
option to further extend this contract to drill an additional
fifth well, in which case the dayrate would increase to
$540,000. The estimated duration for the four-well contract,
including mobilization/demobilization periods, is approximately
230 days, and Ocean Rig estimates that the optional period
to drill the additional fifth well would extend the contract
term by approximately 45 days.
The Eirik Raude is employed under the Tullow Oil contract
for development drilling offshore of Ghana at a weighted average
dayrate of $637,000, based upon 100% utilization. On
February 15, 2011, the dayrate increased to a maximum of
$665,000, which rate will be effective until expiration of the
contract in October 2011. On October 12, 2011, Ocean Rig
entered into drilling contracts for the Eirik Raude for
three additional wells offshore of West Africa, with two
independent oil operators based in the United Kingdom and the
United States. The total revenue backlog, excluding mobilization
cost, to complete the three wells program is estimated at
$96 million for a period of approximately 175 days.
The new contracts are expected to commence after completion of
the existing Tullow Oil contract around mid-October.
The Ocean Rig Corcovado is employed under a contract with
Cairn for a period of approximately ten months, under which the
drillship commenced drilling and related operations in Greenland
in May 2011 at a maximum operating dayrate of $560,000. In
addition, Ocean Rig is entitled to a mobilization fee of
$17.0 million, plus fuel costs, and winterization upgrading
costs of $12.0 million, plus coverage of yard stay costs at
$200,000 per day during the winterization upgrade. The contract
period is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2011, subject
to Ocean Rigs customers option to extend the
contract period through November 30, 2011. On July 20,
2011, Ocean Rig entered into a three-year contract with
Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Corcovado for drilling
operations offshore Brazil at a maximum dayrate of $460,000,
plus a mobilization fee of $30.0 million. The contract is
scheduled to commence upon the expiration of the
drillships contract with Cairn.
The Ocean Rig Olympia is employed under contracts to
drill a total of five wells with Vanco for exploration drilling
offshore of Ghana and Cote dIvoire at a maximum operating
dayrate of $415,000 and a daily mobilization rate of $180,000,
plus fuel costs. The aggregate contract term is for
approximately one year, subject to Ocean Rigs
customers option to extend the term at the same dayrate
for (i) one additional well, (ii) one additional year
or (iii) one additional well plus one additional year.
Vanco is required to exercise the option no later than the date
on which the second well in the five-well program reaches its
target depth.
The Ocean Rig Poseidon commenced a contract with
Petrobras Tanzania, a company related to Petrobras
Oil & Gas, on July 29, 2011 for drilling
operations in Tanzania and West Africa for a period of
544 days, plus a mobilization period, at a maximum dayrate
of $632,000, including a bonus of up to $46,000. In addition,
Ocean Rig is entitled to receive a separate dayrate of $422,500
for up to 60 days during relocation and a mobilization
dayrate of $317,000, plus the cost of fuel. The Ocean Rig
Poseidon is currently earning mobilization fees under the
contract. Drilling operations commenced on August 28, 2011.
On July 20, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into a three-year
contract with Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Mykonos
for drilling operations offshore Brazil at a maximum dayrate
of $455,000, plus a mobilization fee of $30.0 million. The
contract is scheduled to commence in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Ocean Rig has not arranged employment for Ocean Rigs three
seventh generation hulls, which are scheduled to be delivered in
July 2013, September 2013 and November 2013, respectively.
Option to
Purchase Additional New Drillships
On November 22, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into a contract with Samsung that granted
DryShips options for the construction of up to four additional
ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos with certain upgrades to vessel design
and specifications. The option agreement required DryShips to
pay a non-refundable slot reservation fee of $24.8 million
per drillship. The option agreement was novated by DryShips to
Ocean Rig on December 30, 2010, at a cost of
$99.0 million, which Ocean Rig paid from the net proceeds
of a
155
private offering of its common shares that Ocean Rig completed
in December 2010. In addition, Ocean Rig paid additional
deposits totaling $20.0 million to Samsung in the first
quarter of 2011 to maintain favorable costs and yard slot timing
under the option contract.
On May 16, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an addendum to the
option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which Samsung granted
Ocean Rig the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to Ocean Rigs drillships and its
seventh generation hulls, with certain upgrades to vessel design
and specifications. Ocean Rig did not pay slot reservation fees
in connection with its entry into this addendum.
As of the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
Ocean Rig has exercised three of the six options and, as a
result, has entered into shipbuilding contracts for its seventh
generation hulls with deliveries scheduled in July 2013,
September 2013 and November 2013, respectively. Ocean Rig made
payments of $632.4 million to the shipyard in the second
quarter of 2011 in connection with Ocean Rigs exercise of
the three newbuilding drillship options. The estimated total
project cost per drillship is $638.0 million, which
consists of $570.0 million of construction costs, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses of
$30.0 million. These upgrades include a 7 ram BOP, a dual
mud system and, with the purchase of additional equipment, the
capability to drill up to 12,000 feet water depth.
Ocean Rig may exercise three remaining newbuilding drillship
options at any time on or prior January 31, 2012, with
vessel deliveries ranging from the first to the third quarter of
2014, depending on when the options are exercised. Ocean Rig
estimates the total project cost, excluding financing costs, for
the remaining three optional drillships to be
$638.0 million per drillship, based on the construction and
construction-related expenses for Ocean Rigs seventh
generation hulls described above.
As part of the novation of the contract described above, the
benefit of the slot reservation fees passed to Ocean Rig. The
amount of the slot reservation fees for the seventh generation
hulls has been applied towards the drillship contract prices and
the amount of the slot reservation fees applicable to one of the
remaining three newbuilding drillship options will be applied
towards the respective drillship contract price if the options
are exercised.
Management
of Ocean Rigs Drilling Units
Ocean Rigs existing drilling rigs, the Leiv Eiriksson
and the Eirik Raude, are managed by Ocean Rig AS,
Ocean Rigs wholly-owned subsidiary. Ocean Rig AS also
provides supervisory management services including onshore
management, to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig
Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the Ocean Rig
Mykonos and Ocean Rigs newbuilding drillships pursuant
to separate management agreements entered into with each of the
drillship-owning subsidiaries. Under the terms of these
management agreements, Ocean Rig AS, through its offices in
Stavanger, Norway, Aberdeen, United Kingdom and Houston, Texas,
is responsible for, among other things, (i) assisting in
construction contract technical negotiations, (ii) securing
contracts for the future employment of the drillships, and
(iii) providing commercial, technical and operational
management for the drillships.
Global
Services Agreement
On December 1, 2010, DryShips entered into a Global
Services Agreement with Cardiff, a related party, effective
December 21, 2010, pursuant to which DryShips has engaged
Cardiff to act as consultant on matters of chartering and sale
and purchase transactions for the offshore drilling units
operated by us. Under the Global Services Agreement, Cardiff, or
its subcontractor, will (i) provide consulting services
related to identifying, sourcing, negotiating and arranging new
employment for offshore assets of DryShips and its subsidiaries,
including Ocean Rigs drilling units and
(ii) identify, source, negotiate and arrange the sale or
purchase of the offshore assets of DryShips and its
subsidiaries, including Ocean Rigs drilling units. Ocean
Rig may benefit from services provided in accordance with Global
Services Agreement.
The Global Services Agreement does not apply to the agreement
with Petrobras Oil & Gas regarding the early
termination of the Petrobras contract for the Leiv Eiriksson
and the employment of the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
contracts with Cairn and Borders & Southern for the
Leiv Eiriksson. Except as otherwise described, the Global
Services Agreement applies to all contracts entered into after
December 21, 2010 as well as the contract with Cairn for
the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the contract with Vanco for
the Ocean Rig Olympia. Ocean Rig does not pay or
156
reimburse DryShips or its affiliates for services provided under
the Global Services Agreement. Ocean Rig will, however, record
expenses incurred under the Global Services Agreement in its
income statement and as a shareholders contribution
(additional paid-in capital) to capital when they are incurred.
The services described above provided by Ocean Rig AS and
Cardiff overlap mainly with respect to negotiating shipyard
orders and providing marketing for potential contractors.
Cardiff has an established reputation within the shipping
industry, and has developed expertise and a network of strong
relationships with shipbuilders and oil companies, which
supplement the management capabilities of Ocean Rig AS.
For a discussion of Ocean Rigs management agreements with
Cardiff that terminated on December 21, 2010, please see
Ocean Rig Related Party Transactions Ocean Rig
Related Party Agreements Management agreements with
Cardiff Management fees to related party.
Potential
Conflicts of Interest
Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Economou, is also the Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company. Ocean Rigs officers and directors have fiduciary
duties to manage Ocean Rigs business in a manner
beneficial to Ocean Rig and its shareholders. Mr. Economou
has fiduciary duties to manage the business of DryShips and its
affiliates in a manner beneficial to such entities and their
shareholders. Consequently, Mr. Economou may encounter
situations in which his fiduciary obligations to DryShips and
Ocean Rig are in conflict. Any proposed transaction with a
related party is subject to the review and approval of the
independent members of Ocean Rigs board of directors.
Ocean
Rigs Competitive Strengths
Ocean Rig believes that its prospects for success are enhanced
by the following aspects of its business:
Proven track record in ultra-deepwater drilling
operations. Ocean Rig has a well-established
record of operating drilling equipment with a primary focus on
ultra-deepwater offshore locations and harsh environments.
Established in 1996, Ocean Rig employed 1,093 people as of
September 30, 2011, and have gained significant experience
operating in challenging environments with a proven track record
for operations excellence through its completion of
105 wells. Ocean Rig capitalizes on its high-specification
drilling units to the maximum extent of their technical
capability, and Ocean Rig believes that it has earned a
reputation for operating performance excellence. Ocean Rig has
operated the Leiv Eiriksson since 2001 and the Eirik
Raude since 2002. From February 24, 2010 through
February 3, 2011, the Leiv Eiriksson performed
drilling operations in the Black Sea under the Petrobras
contract and achieved a 91% earnings efficiency. The Eirik
Raude has been operating in deep water offshore of Ghana
under the Tullow Oil contract and achieved a 98% earnings
efficiency for the period beginning October 2008, when the rig
commenced the contract, through June 30, 2011.
Technologically advanced deepwater drilling
units. According to Fearnley Offshore AS, the
Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude are two of only
15 drilling units worldwide as of July 2011 that are
technologically equipped to operate in both ultra-deepwater and
harsh environments. Additionally, each of Ocean Rigs
drillships will be either a sixth or seventh generation,
advanced capability, ultra-deepwater drillship built based on a
proven design that features full dual derrick enhancements. The
Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos have the
capacity to drill 40,000 feet at water depths of
10,000 feet and Ocean Rigs three seventh generation
hulls will have the capacity to drill 40,000 feet at water
depths of 12,000 feet. One of the key benefits of each of
Ocean Rigs drillships is its dual activity drilling
capabilities, which involves two drilling systems that use a
single derrick and which permits two drilling-related operations
to take place simultaneously. Ocean Rig estimates that this
capability reduces typical drilling time by approximately 15% to
40%, depending on the well parameters, resulting in greater
utilization and cost savings to Ocean Rigs customers.
According to Fearnley Offshore AS, of the 34 ultra-deepwater
drilling units to be delivered worldwide in 2011, only 11 are
expected to have dual activity drilling capabilities, including
Ocean Rigs four drillships. As a result of the
Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling accident in the Gulf
of Mexico in April 2010, in which Ocean Rig was not involved,
Ocean Rig believes that independently and nationally owned oil
companies and international governments will increase their
focus on safety and the prevention of environmental disasters
and, as a result, Ocean Rig
157
expects that high quality and technologically advanced
drillships such as Ocean Rigs will be in high demand and
at the forefront of ultra-deepwater drilling activity.
Long-term blue-chip customer
relationships. Since the commencement of Ocean
Rigs operations, Ocean Rig has developed relationships
with large independent oil producers such as Chevron,
ExxonMobil, Petrobras Oil & Gas, Shell, BP, Total,
Statoil, and Tullow Oil. Together with Ocean Rigs
predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, it has drilled 105 wells in 15
countries for 22 clients, including those listed above.
Currently, Ocean Rig has employment contracts with Petrobras
Oil & Gas, Petrobras Tanzania, Petrobras Brazil,
Tullow Oil, Borders & Southern, Cairn and Vanco. Ocean
Rig believes these strong customer relationships stem from its
proven track record for dependability and for delivering
high-quality drilling services in the most extreme operating
environments. Although Ocean Rigs former clients are not
obligated to use its services, Ocean Rig expects to use its
relationships with its current and former customers to secure
attractive employment contracts for its drilling units.
High barriers to entry. There are significant
barriers to entry in the ultra-deepwater offshore drilling
industry. Given the technical expertise needed to operate
ultra-deepwater drilling rigs and drillships, operational
know-how and a track record of safety play an important part in
contract awards. The offshore drilling industry in some
jurisdictions is highly regulated, and compliance with
regulations requires significant operational expertise and
financial and management resources. With the negative press
around the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig accident, Ocean
Rig expects regulators worldwide to implement more stringent
regulations and oil companies to place a premium on drilling
firms with a proven track record for safety. There are also
significant capital requirements for building ultra-deepwater
drillships. Further, there is limited shipyard availability for
new drillships and required lead times are typically in excess
of two years. Additionally, due to the recent financial crisis,
access to bank lending, the traditional source for ship and
offshore financing, has become constrained. According to
Fearnley Offshore AS, as of July 2011 there were 85
ultra-deepwater drilling units in operation with another 62
under construction, including Ocean Rigs the Ocean Rig
Poseidon, the Ocean Rig Mykonos and its three
newbuilding drillships.
Anticipated strong free cash flow
generation. Based on current and expected supply
and demand dynamics in ultra-deepwater drilling, Ocean Rig
expects dayrates to be above Ocean Rigs estimated daily
cash breakeven rate, based on estimated daily operating costs,
general and administrative costs and debt service requirements,
thereby generating substantial free cash flow going forward.
According to Fearnley Offshore AS, the most recent charterhire
in the industry for a modern ultra-deepwater drillship or rig
(June 2011) was at a gross dayrate of $450,000 for a
two-year contract commencing in the third quarter of 2012. As of
September 30, 2011, Ocean Rigs
five-unit
fleet generated a maximum average dayrate of $560,000.
Leading shipbuilder constructing its
newbuildings. Only a limited number of
shipbuilders possess the necessary construction and underwater
drilling technologies and experience to construct drillships.
The Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia,
the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
were, and Ocean Rigs three newbuilding drillships are
being, built by Samsung, which is one of the worlds
largest shipbuilders in the high-tech and high-value
shipbuilding sectors, which include drillships, ultra-large
container ships, liquefied natural gas carriers and floating
production storage and offshore units, or FPSOs. According to
Fearnley Offshore AS, of the 74 drillships ordered on a global
basis since 2005, Samsung has delivered or will deliver 40,
representing a 54% market share. To date, construction of Ocean
Rigs newbuilding drillships has progressed on time and on
budget.
Experienced management and operations
team. Ocean Rig has an experienced management and
operations team with a proven track record and an average of
24 years of experience in the offshore drilling industry.
Many of the core members of Ocean Rigs management team
have worked together since 2006, and certain members of its
management team have worked at leading oil-related and shipping
companies such as ExxonMobil, Statoil, Transocean, ProSafe and
Smedvig (acquired by Seadrill Limited). In addition to the
members of the management team, Ocean Rig had at
September 30, 2011, 39 employees of the Company
overseeing construction of Ocean Rigs newbuilding
drillships and will have highly trained personnel operating the
drillships once they are delivered from the yard. Ocean Rig also
had at September 30, 2011, an onshore team of
116 people in management functions as well as
administrative and technical staff and support functions,
ranging from marketing, human resources, accounting, finance,
technical support and health, environment, safety and quality,
or HES&Q. Ocean Rig believes
158
the focus and dedication of its personnel in each step of the
process, from design to construction to operation, has
contributed to its track record of safety and consistently
strong operational performance.
Business
Strategy
Ocean Rigs business strategy is predicated on becoming a
leading company in the offshore ultra-deepwater drilling
industry and providing customers with safe, high quality service
and
state-of-the-art
drilling equipment. The following outlines the primary elements
of this strategy:
Create a pure play model in the ultra-deepwater
and harsh environment markets. Ocean Rigs
mission is to become the preferred offshore drilling contractor
in the ultra-deepwater and harsh environment regions of the
world and to deliver excellent performance to Ocean Rigs
clients by exceeding their expectations for operational
efficiency and safety standards. Ocean Rig believes the Ocean
Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean
Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos are, and Ocean
Rigs three newbuilding drillships will be, among the most
technologically advanced in the world. Ocean Rig currently has
an option to purchase up to three additional newbuilding
drillships and Ocean Rig intends to grow its fleet over time in
order to continue to meet its customers demands while
optimizing its fleet size from an operational and logistical
perspective.
Capitalize on the operating capabilities of its drilling
units. Ocean Rig plans to capitalize on the
operating capabilities of its drilling units by entering into
attractive employment contracts. The focus of its marketing
effort is to maximize the benefits of the drilling units
ability to operate in ultra-deepwater drilling locations. As
described above, the Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude are
two of only 15 drilling units worldwide as of July 2011 that are
technologically equipped to operate in both ultra-deepwater and
harsh environments, and Ocean Rigs drillships will have
the capacity to drill 40,000 feet at water depths of
10,000 feet or, in the case of Ocean Rigs seventh
generation hulls, 12,000 feet with dual activity drilling
capabilities. Ocean Rig aims to secure firm employment contracts
for the drilling units at or near the highest dayrates available
in the industry at that time while balancing appropriate
contract lengths. As Ocean Rig works towards its goal of
securing firm contracts for its drilling units at attractive
dayrates, Ocean Rig believes it will be able to differentiate
itself based on its prior experience operating drilling rigs and
its safety record.
Maintain high drilling units utilization and
profitability. Ocean Rig has a proven track
record of optimizing equipment utilization. Until February 2011,
the Leiv Eiriksson was operating in the Black Sea under
the Petrobras contract and maintained a 91% earnings efficiency
from February 24, 2010 through February 3, 2011, for
the period it performed drilling operations under the contract.
The Eirik Raude has been operating offshore of Ghana
under the Tullow Oil contract and maintained a 98% earnings
efficiency from October 2008, when it commenced operations under
the contract, through March 31, 2011. Ocean Rig aims to
maximize the revenue generation of its drilling units by
maintaining its track record of high drilling unit utilization
as a result of the design capabilities of its drilling units
that can operate in harsh environmental conditions.
Capitalize on favorable industry
dynamics. Ocean Rig believes the demand for
offshore deepwater drilling units will be positively affected by
increasing global demand for oil and gas and increased
exploration and development activity in deepwater markets. The
IEA projected that oil demand for 2010 increased by 3.4%
compared to 2009 levels, and that oil demand will further
increase to 89.2 million barrels per day in 2011, an
increase of 1.5% compared to 2010 levels. As the OECD countries
resume their growth and the major non-OECD countries continue to
develop, led by China and India, oil demand is expected to grow.
Ocean Rig believes it will become increasingly difficult to find
the incremental barrels of oil needed, due to depleting existing
oil reserves. This is expected to force oil companies to
continue to explore for oil farther offshore for growing their
proven reserves. According to Fearnley Offshore AS, from 2005 to
2010, the actual spending directly related to ultra-deepwater
drilling units increased from $4.7 billion to
$19.0 billion, a CAGR of 32.2%.
Continue to prioritize safety as a key focus of Ocean
Rigs operations. Ocean Rig believe safety
is of paramount importance to its customers and a key
differentiator for Ocean Rig when securing drilling contracts
from its customers. Ocean Rig has a zero incident philosophy
embedded in its corporate culture, which is reflected in its
policies and procedures. Despite operating under severely harsh
weather conditions, Ocean Rig has a proven track record of high
efficiency deepwater and ultra-deepwater drilling operations.
Ocean Rig employed 1,093 people as of September 30,
2011, and has been operating ultra-deepwater drilling rigs since
2001. Ocean Rig has extensive
159
experience working in varying environments and regulatory
regimes across the globe, including Eastern Canada, Angola,
Congo, Ireland, the Gulf of Mexico, the U.K., West of Shetlands,
Norway, including the Barents Sea, Ghana and Turkey.
Both of Ocean Rigs drilling rigs and one of its
drillships, the Ocean Rig Corcovado, have a valid and
updated safety case under U.K. Health and Safety Executive, or
HSE, regulations, and both of Ocean Rigs drilling rigs
hold a Norwegian sector certificate of compliance (called an
Acknowledgement of Compliance), which evidences that the rigs
and Ocean Rigs management system meet the requirements set
by the U.K. and Norwegian authorities.
Ocean Rig believes that this safety record has enabled it to
hire and retain highly-skilled employees, thereby improving its
overall operating and financial performance. Ocean Rig expects
to continue its strong commitment to safety across all of its
operations by investing in the latest technologies, performing
regular planned maintenance on its drilling units and investing
in the training and development of new safety programs for its
employees.
Implement and sustain a competitive cost
structure. Ocean Rig believes that it has a
competitive cost structure due to its operating experience and
successful employee retention policies and that its retention of
highly-skilled personnel leads to significant transferable
experience and knowledge of drilling rig operation through
deployment of seasoned crews across its fleet. By focusing on
the ultra-deepwater segment, Ocean Rig believes that it is able
to design and implement
best-in-class
processes to streamline its operations and improve efficiency.
As Ocean Rig grows, it hopes to benefit from significant
economies of scale due to an increased fleet size and a fleet of
sister-ships to Ocean Rigs drillships, where
Ocean Rig expects to benefit from the standardization of these
drilling units, resulting in lower training and operating costs.
In addition, Ocean Rigs drillships have high-end
specifications, including advanced technology and safety
features, and, therefore, Ocean Rig expects that the need for
upgrades will be limited in the near term. Ocean Rig expects the
increase from six to nine drilling units to enable it to bring
more than one unit into a drilling region in which Ocean Rig
operates. To the extent Ocean Rig operates more than one
drilling unit in a drilling region, Ocean Rig expects to benefit
from economies of scale and improved logistic coordination
managing more units from the same onshore bases.
Risk
Factors
Ocean Rig faces a number of risks associated with its business
and industry and must overcome a variety of challenges to
utilize Ocean Rigs strengths and implement its business
strategy. These risks include, among others, changes in the
offshore drilling market, including supply and demand,
utilization rates, dayrates, customer drilling programs, and
commodity prices; a downturn in the global economy; hazards
inherent in the drilling industry and marine operations
resulting in liability for personal injury or loss of life,
damage to or destruction of property and equipment, pollution or
environmental damage; inability to comply with loan covenants;
inability to finance shipyard and other capital projects; and
inability to successfully employ Ocean Rigs drilling units.
This is not a comprehensive list of risks to which Ocean Rig is
subject, and you should carefully consider all the information
in this proxy statement / prospectus. In particular,
Ocean Rig urges you to carefully consider the risk factors set
forth in the section of this proxy
statement / prospectus entitled Risk
Factors beginning on page 29.
Industry
Overview
In recent years, the international drilling market has seen an
increasing trend towards deep and ultra-deepwater oil and gas
exploration. As shallow water resources mature, deep and
ultra-deepwater regions are expected to play an increasing role
in offshore oil and gas production. According to Fearnley
Offshore AS, the ultra-deepwater market has seen rapid
development over the last six years, with dayrates increasing
from approximately $180,000 in 2004 to above $600,000 in 2008,
before declining to a level of approximately $453,000 in July
2011. The ultra-deepwater market rig utilization rate has been
stable above 80% since 2000 and above 97% since 2006. The
operating units capable of drilling in ultra-deepwater depths of
greater than 7,500 feet consist mainly of fifth- and
sixth-generation units, but also include certain older upgraded
units. The in-service fleet as of July 2011 totaled
85 units, and is expected to grow to 147 units upon
the scheduled delivery of the current newbuild orderbook by the
middle of 2014. Historically, an increase in supply has caused a
decline in utilization and dayrates until drilling units are
absorbed into the market. Accordingly, dayrates have been very
cyclical. Ocean Rig believes that the largest undiscovered
offshore reserves are mostly located in ultra-deepwater fields
and primarily located in the golden
160
triangle between West Africa, Brazil and the Gulf of
Mexico. The location of these large offshore reserves has
resulted in more than 90% of the floater orderbook being
represented by ultra-deepwater units. Furthermore, due to
increased focus on technically challenging operations and the
inherent risk of developing offshore fields in ultra-deepwater,
particularly in light of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
in the Gulf of Mexico, oil companies have already begun to show
a preference for modern units more capable of drilling in these
harsh environments. See The Offshore Drilling
Industry.
Corporate
Structure
Ocean Rig is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the
Marshall Islands on December 10, 2007 under the name
Primelead Shareholders Inc. Primelead Shareholders Inc. was
formed in December 2007 for the purpose of acquiring the shares
of Ocean Rigs predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, which was
incorporated in September 1996 under the laws of Norway. Ocean
Rig acquired control of Ocean Rig ASA on May 14, 2008.
Prior to the private placement of its common shares in December
2010, Ocean Rig was a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips. As of
the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
DryShips owns approximately 75% of Ocean Rigs outstanding
common shares. Each of its drilling units is owned by a separate
wholly-owned subsidiary. Ocean Rig is the owner, directly or
indirectly, of all the issued and outstanding shares of the
subsidiaries listed in Exhibit 21.1 to the registration
statement on
Form F-4,
of which this proxy statement / prospectus is a part.
Ocean Rig maintains its principal executive offices at 10 Skopa
Street, Tribune House, 2nd Floor, Office 202, CY 1075, Nicosia,
Cyprus and its telephone number at that address is 011 357
22767517. Ocean Rigs website is located at
www.ocean-rig.com. The information on Ocean Rigs website
is not a part of this proxy statement / prospectus.
Customers
Ocean Rigs prospective customers generally fall within
three categories: national oil companies, large integrated major
oil companies and medium to smaller independent exploration and
production companies. Ocean Rig, together with its predecessor,
Ocean Rig ASA, have an established history with 105 wells
drilled in 15 countries for 22 different customers. During 2010,
Ocean Rigs drilling contracts with Petrobras and Tullow
Oil accounted for 43% and 57% of the total consolidated annual
revenues, respectively. During 2009, Ocean Rigs drilling
contracts with Shell and Tullow Oil accounted for 38% and 62% of
the total consolidated annual revenues, respectively. During the
period from May 14, 2008 through December 31, 2008,
Ocean Rigs drilling contracts with Shell accounted for
54%, Exxon for 26% and Tullow Oil for 20% of the total
consolidated annual revenues.
Contract
Drilling Services
Ocean Rigs contracts to provide offshore drilling services
and drilling units are individually negotiated and vary in their
terms and provisions. Ocean Rig generally obtains its contracts
through competitive bidding against other contractors. The
contracts for Ocean Rigs drilling units typically provide
for compensation on a dayrate basis under which
Ocean Rig is paid a fixed amount for each day that the vessel is
operating under a contract at full efficiency, with higher rates
while the drilling unit is operating and lower rates for periods
of mobilization or when drilling operations are interrupted or
restricted by equipment breakdowns, adverse environmental
conditions or other conditions beyond Ocean Rigs control.
Under most dayrate contracts, Ocean Rig pays the operating
expenses of the rig or drillship, including planned rig
maintenance, crew wages, insurance and the cost of supplies.
A dayrate drilling contract generally extends over a period of
time covering either the drilling of a single well or group of
wells or covering a stated term, as do the current contracts for
Ocean Rigs drilling rigs. Currently, there is no spot
market for offshore drilling units. The length of shorter-term
contracts is typically from 60 to 365 days and the
longer-term contracts are typically from two to five years. From
time to time contracts with customers in the offshore drilling
industry may contain terms whereby the customer has an option to
cancel upon payment of an early termination payment, but where
such payments may not fully compensate for the loss of the
contract. Contracts also customarily provide for either
automatic termination or termination at the option of the
customer typically without the payment of any termination fee,
under various circumstances such as major nonperformance, in the
event of substantial downtime or impaired performance caused by
equipment or operational issues, or sustained periods of
161
downtime due to force majeure events. Many of these events are
beyond Ocean Rigs control. The contract term in some
instances may be extended by the client exercising options for
the drilling of additional wells or for an additional term.
Ocean Rigs contracts also typically include a provision
that allows the client to extend the contract to finish drilling
a
well-in-progress.
Ocean Rig expects that provisions of future contracts will be
similar to those in Ocean Rigs current contracts for its
drilling units.
In October 2009, the Leiv Eiriksson commenced the
Petrobras contract for exploration drilling in the Black Sea at
a maximum dayrate rate of $583,000, expiring in October 2012.
Pursuant to an agreement, dated as of December 21, 2010, by
and between Petrobras Oil & Gas and Ocean Rig 1 Inc.,
the owner of the Leiv Eiriksson, the Leiv Eiriksson
was released from the Petrobras contract on April 10,
2011 and was replaced by the Ocean Rig Poseidon. On
April 21, 2011, the Leiv Eiriksson commenced a
contract with a term of approximately six months Cairn, which
was entered into in January 2011, for drilling operations in
Greenland at a maximum operating dayrate of $560,000 and a
mobilization fee of $7.0 million plus fuel costs. The
contract period is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2011,
subject to Ocean Rigs customers option to extend the
contract period through November 30, 2011. Following the
expiration of its contract with Cairn, the Leiv Eiriksson
is scheduled to commence a contract with Borders &
Southern for drilling operations offshore the Falkland Islands
at a maximum operating dayrate of $530,000 and a
$3.0 million fee payable upon commencement of mobilization
as well as mobilization and demobilization fees, including fuel
costs, of $15.4 million and $12.6 million,
respectively. The contract was originally a two-well program at
a maximum dayrate of $540,000; however, on May 19, 2011,
Borders & Southern exercised its option to extend the
contract to drill an additional two wells, which it assigned to
Falkland Oil and Gas Limited, or Falkland Oil and Gas, and the
maximum dayrate decreased to $530,000. Borders &
Southern has the option to further extend this contract to drill
an additional fifth well, in which case the dayrate would
increase to $540,000. The estimated duration for the four-well
contract, including mobilization/demobilization periods, is
approximately 230 days, and Ocean Rig estimates that the
optional period to drill the additional fifth well would extend
the contract term by approximately 45 days. The Eirik
Raude was originally scheduled to commence this contract
with Borders & Southern; however on May 5, 2011,
Ocean Rig terminated the contract for the Eirik Raude and
entered into a new contract for the Leiv Eiriksson on the
same terms as the original contract for the Eirik Raude,
with the exception of the fees payable upon mobilization and
demobilization and certain other terms specific to the Leiv
Eiriksson, including off-hire dates, period surveys and
technical specifications.
In October 2008, the Eirik Raude commenced the Tullow Oil
contract for development drilling offshore of Ghana at an
average dayrate of $637,000, based upon 100% utilization,
expiring in October 2011. Under the Tullow Oil contract, the
dayrate is escalated each year by $18,000. Beginning on
February 15, 2011, the dayrate increased to a maximum of
$665,000 and will be effective until expiration of the contract.
From October 9, 2008 through December 31, 2010, the
rig had an earnings efficiency of 98%. On October 12, 2011,
Ocean Rig entered into drilling contracts for the Eirik Raude
for three additional wells offshore of West Africa, with two
independent oil operators based in the United Kingdom and the
United States. The total revenue backlog, excluding mobilization
cost, to complete the three wells program is estimated at
$96 million for a period of approximately 175 days.
The new contracts are expected to commence after completion of
the existing Tullow Oil contract around mid-October.
In January 2011, Ocean Rig commenced a contract with a term of
approximately ten months with Cairn for the Ocean Rig
Corcovado, under which the Ocean Rig Corcovado
commenced drilling and related operations in Greenland in
May 2011 at a maximum operating dayrate of $560,000. In
addition, Ocean Rig is entitled to a mobilization fee of
$17.0 million plus fuel costs and winterization upgrading
costs of $12.0 million plus coverage of yard stay costs at
$200,000 per day during the winterization upgrade. The contract
period is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2011, subject
to Ocean Rigs customers option to extend the
contract period through November 30, 2011. On July 20,
2011, Ocean Rig entered into a three-year contract with
Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Corcovado for drilling
operations offshore Brazil at a maximum dayrate of $460,000,
plus a mobilization fee of $30.0 million. The contract is
scheduled to commence upon the expiration of the
drillships contract with Cairn.
In October 2010, Ocean Rig entered into contracts with Vanco for
the Ocean Rig Olympia to drill a total of five wells for
exploration drilling offshore of Ghana and Cote dIvoire at
a maximum operating dayrate of $415,000 and a daily mobilization
rate of $180,000 plus fuel costs. The Ocean Rig Olympia
commenced the contracts directly
162
upon delivery on March 30, 2010. The aggregate contract
term is for approximately one year, subject to Ocean Rigs
customers option to extend the term for (i) one
additional well, (ii) one additional year, or
(iii) one additional well plus one additional year. Vanco
is required to exercise the option no later than the date on
which the second well in the five well program reaches its
target depth.
Pursuant to the agreement described above and a contract entered
into with Petrobras Tanzania in December 2010, the Ocean Rig
Poseidon commenced a
544-day
contract, plus a mobilization period, with Petrobras Tanzania on
July 29, 2011 for exploration drilling in West Africa and
Tanzania at a maximum dayrate of $632,000, including a bonus of
up to $46,000. In addition, Ocean Rig is entitled to receive a
separate dayrate of $422,500 for up to 60 days during
relocation and a mobilization dayrate of $317,000 plus the cost
of fuel. The Ocean Rig Poseidon is currently earning
mobilization fees under the contract. Drilling operations
commenced on August 28, 2011.
On July 20, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into a three-year
contract with Petrobras Brazil for the Ocean Rig Mykonos
for drilling operations offshore Brazil at a maximum dayrate
of $455,000, plus a mobilization fee of $30.0 million. The
contract is scheduled to commence in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Competition
The offshore contract drilling industry is competitive with
numerous industry participants, few of which at the present time
have a dominant market share. The drilling industry has
experienced consolidation in recent years and may experience
additional consolidation, which could create additional large
competitors. Many of Ocean Rigs competitors have
significantly greater financial and other resources, including
more drilling units, than Ocean Rig. Ocean Rig competes with
offshore drilling contractors that together have approximately
156 deepwater and ultra-deepwater drilling units worldwide,
defined as units with water depth capacity of 3,000 feet or
more.
The offshore contract drilling industry is influenced by a
number of factors, including global demand for oil and natural
gas, current and anticipated prices of oil and natural gas,
expenditures by oil and gas companies for exploration and
development of oil and natural gas and the availability of
drilling rigs. In addition, mergers among oil and natural gas
exploration and production companies have reduced, and may from
time to time reduce, the number of available customers.
Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded on a competitive
bid basis. Intense price competition is often the primary factor
in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a job.
Customers may also consider unit availability, location and
suitability, a drilling contractors operational and safety
performance record, and condition and suitability of equipment.
Ocean Rig believes that it competes favorably with respect to
these factors.
Ocean Rig competes on a worldwide basis, but competition may
vary significantly by region at any particular time. Competition
for offshore units generally takes place on a global basis, as
these units are highly mobile and may be moved, at a cost that
may be substantial, from one region to another. Competing
contractors are able to adjust localized supply and demand
imbalances by moving units from areas of low utilization and
dayrates to areas of greater activity and relatively higher
dayrates. Significant new unit construction and upgrades of
existing drilling units could also intensify price competition.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, Ocean Rigs management
subsidiaries had approximately 564 employees, of which
approximately 445 were employed by Ocean Rigs management
subsidiaries and 119 were full-time crew engaged through
third-party crewing agencies. Of the total number of employees,
approximately 160 were assigned to the Eirik Raude,
approximately 143 were assigned to the Leiv Eiriksson,
approximately 139 were assigned to the Ocean Rig Corcovado
and 50 were assigned to the Ocean Rig Olympia. These
numbers include shore-based support teams in Turkey and Ghana.
The newbuild drillship project team, located in Korea and
Norway, employed 50 employees, while the management and
staff positions at the Stavanger office consisted of
59 employees. In addition, there were four employees based
at the London office and two employees based in other locations.
As of September 30, 2011, the total number of employees
increased to 1,093, of which 778 are Ocean Rigs employees
and 315 are provided by third-party companies. The increase is
primarily due to the increase in manning levels on four of Ocean
Rigs
163
drillships as follows: 175 to Ocean Rig Corcovado, 199 to
Ocean Rig Olympia, 131 to Ocean Rig Poseidon and
89 to Ocean Rig Mykonos.
Recruitment
for Drillship Operations
Ocean Rig will have 90 employees per drillship as base crew
and the remainder will be recruited according to contract,
location and the availability of quality personnel in that area.
The Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean Rig Olympia,
the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
are fully crewed and Ocean Rig is engaged in hiring crew for
its three drillships under construction, which Ocean Rig expects
to complete prior to the delivery of the applicable drillship.
Properties
Ocean Rig maintains its principal executive offices in Nicosia,
Cyprus and principally markets its services to clients and
potential clients worldwide out of its subsidiaries located in
Stavanger, Norway, Houston, Texas and Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Ocean Rig provides technical and administrative support
functions from these offices with support from its other offices
in Accra, Ghana, Edinburgh, United Kingdom and Geoje, Korea.
Environmental
and Other Regulations
Ocean Rigs offshore drilling operations include activities
that are subject to numerous international, federal, state and
local laws and regulations, including the International
Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, or
MARPOL, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil
Pollution Damage of 1969, generally referred to as CLC, the
International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil
Pollution Damage, or Bunker Convention, the U.S. Oil
Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, the
U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, and Brazils
National Environmental Policy Law (6938/81), Environmental
Crimes Law (9605/98) and Law 9966/2000 relating to pollution in
Brazilian waters. These laws govern the discharge of materials
into the environment or otherwise relate to environmental
protection. In certain circumstances, these laws may impose
strict liability, rendering Ocean Rig liable for environmental
and natural resource damages without regard to negligence or
fault on its part.
For example, the United Nations International Maritime
Organization, or IMO, adopted MARPOL and Annex VI to MARPOL
to regulate the discharge of harmful air emissions from ships,
which include rigs and drillships. Rigs and drillships must
comply with MARPOL limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide
emissions, chlorofluorocarbons, and the discharge of other air
pollutants, except that the MARPOL limits do not apply to
emissions that are directly related to drilling, production, or
processing activities.
Ocean Rigs drilling units are subject not only to MARPOL
regulation of air emissions, but also to the Bunker
Conventions strict liability for pollution damage caused
by discharges of bunker fuel in ratifying states. Ocean Rig
believes that all of its drilling units are currently compliant
in all material respects with these regulations. In October
2008, IMOs Maritime Environment Protection Committee, or
MEPC, adopted amendments to the Annex VI regulations which
entered into force on July 1, 2010, that will require a
progressive reduction of sulfur oxide levels in heavy bunker
fuels and create more stringent nitrogen oxide emissions
standards for marine engines in the future. Ocean Rig may incur
costs to comply with these revised standards.
Furthermore, any drillships that Ocean Rig may operate in United
States waters, including the U.S. territorial sea and the
200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone around the United
States, would have to comply with OPA and CERCLA requirements
that impose liability (unless the spill results solely from the
act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of
war) for all containment and
clean-up
costs and other damages arising from discharges of oil or other
hazardous substances, other than discharges related to drilling.
The U.S. BOEMRE periodically issues guidelines for rig
fitness requirements in the Gulf of Mexico and may take other
steps that could increase the cost of operations or reduce the
area of operations for Ocean Rigs units, thus reducing
their marketability. Implementation of BOEMRE guidelines or
regulations may subject the Company to increased costs or limit
the operational capabilities of its units and could materially
and adversely affect the Companys operations and financial
condition.
164
Numerous governmental agencies issue regulations to implement
and enforce the laws of the applicable jurisdiction, which often
involve lengthy permitting procedures, impose difficult and
costly compliance measures, particularly in ecologically
sensitive areas, and subject operators to substantial
administrative, civil and criminal penalties or may result in
injunctive relief for failure to comply. Some of these laws
contain criminal sanctions in addition to civil penalties.
Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently,
and any changes that result in more stringent and costly
compliance or limit contract drilling opportunities, including
changes in response to a serious marine incident that results in
significant oil pollution or otherwise causes significant
adverse environmental impact, such as the April 2010
Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, could
adversely affect Ocean Rigs financial results. While Ocean
Rig believes that it is in substantial compliance with the
current laws and regulations, there is no assurance that
compliance can be maintained in the future.
In addition to the MARPOL, OPA, and CERCLA requirements
described above, Ocean Rigs international operations in
the offshore drilling segment are subject to various laws and
regulations in countries in which it operates, including laws
and regulations relating to the importation of and operation of
drilling units and equipment, currency conversions and
repatriation, oil and gas exploration and development,
environmental protection, taxation of offshore earnings and
earnings of expatriate personnel, the use of local employees and
suppliers by foreign contractors and duties on the importation
and exportation of drilling units and other equipment. New
environmental or safety laws and regulations could be enacted,
which could adversely affect Ocean Rigs ability to operate
in certain jurisdictions. Governments in some countries have
become increasingly active in regulating and controlling the
ownership of concessions and companies holding concessions, the
exploration for oil and gas and other aspects of the oil and gas
industries in their countries. In some areas of the world, this
governmental activity has adversely affected the amount of
exploration and development work done by major oil and gas
companies and may continue to do so. Operations in less
developed countries can be subject to legal systems that are not
as mature or predictable as those in more developed countries,
which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal matters and
proceedings.
Implementation of new environmental laws or regulations that may
apply to ultra-deepwater drilling units may subject Ocean Rig to
increased costs or limit the operational capabilities of Ocean
Rigs drilling units and could materially and adversely
affect Ocean Rigs operations and financial condition.
Insurance
for Ocean Rigs Offshore Drilling Units
Ocean Rig maintains insurance for its drilling units in
accordance with industry standards. Ocean Rigs insurance
is intended to cover normal risks in its current operations,
including insurance against property damage, loss of hire, war
risk and third-party liability, including pollution liability.
The insurance coverage is established according to the Norwegian
Marine Insurance Plan of 1996, version 2010, which together with
the London Drilling Standard Form Plan is the industry
standard. Ocean Rig has obtained insurance for the full assessed
market value of Ocean Rigs drilling units, as assessed by
rig brokers. Ocean Rigs insurance provides for premium
adjustments based on claims and is subject to deductibles and
aggregate recovery limits. In the case of pollution liabilities,
Ocean Rigs deductible is $10,000 per event and in the case
of other hull and machinery claims, Ocean Rigs deductible
is $1.5 million per event, except in the case of its
operations offshore Greenland under its contracts with Cairn,
where the deductible is $3.0 million for the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and $4.5 million for the Leiv
Eiriksson. However, for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Leiv Eiriksson, the aggregate recovery limits under
the Cairn contracts offshore of Greenland are $750 million
for oil pollution. Ocean Rigs insurance coverage may not
protect fully against losses resulting from a required cessation
of drilling unit operations for environmental or other reasons.
Ocean Rig also has loss of hire insurance which becomes
effective after 45 days of off-hire and coverage extends
for approximately one year, except for Ocean Rigs
operations offshore Greenland under its contracts with Cairn,
where the loss of hire insurance becomes effective after
60 days. The principal risks which may not be insurable are
various environmental liabilities and liabilities resulting from
reservoir damage caused by Ocean Rigs negligence. In
addition, insurance may not be available to Ocean Rig at all or
on terms acceptable to Ocean Rig, and there is no guarantee that
even if Ocean Rig is insured, its policy will be adequate to
cover its loss or liability in all cases. Ocean Rig maintains
insurance for its drillships in accordance with the Norwegian
Marine Insurance Plan of 1996, version 2010. This insurance
would also be intended to cover normal risks in its current
operations, including insurance against property damage, loss of
hire, war risk, third-party liability, including pollution
liability and loss of hire.
165
Legal
Proceedings
Import/export
duties in Angola
The Leiv Eiriksson operated in Angola during the period
from 2002 to 2007. Ocean Rig understands that the Angolan
government has retroactively levied import/export duties for two
importation events in the period 2002 to 2007. As Ocean Rig has
formally disputed all claims in relation to the potential
duties, no provision has been made. The maximum amount is
estimated to be between $5 million and $10 million.
Other
legal proceedings
With the exception of the matters discussed above, Ocean Rig is
not involved in any legal proceedings or disputes that it
believes will have a significant effect on its business,
financial position, and results of operations or liquidity. From
time to time, Ocean Rig may be subject to legal proceedings and
claims in the ordinary course of business. It is expected that
these claims would be covered by insurance if they involved
liabilities such as those that arise from a collision, other
marine casualty, damage to cargoes, oil pollution, death or
personal injuries to crew, subject to customary deductibles.
Those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the
expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Exchange
Controls
Under Republic of the Marshall Islands law, there are currently
no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including
foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the
remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to
non-resident holders of Ocean Rigs common stock.
Description
of Indebtedness
As of June 30, 2011, Ocean Rigs outstanding debt
totaled $2.2 billion, consisting of bank debt under its
various secured credit facilities described below. As of
June 30, 2011, Ocean Rig also had $0.7 billion
available for drawdown under Ocean Rigs credit facilities,
subject to restrictions, as described below. The table below
reflects its outstanding indebtedness as of June 30, 2011,
as adjusted for scheduled payments under Ocean Rigs credit
facilities up to July 31, 2011. The table below has not
been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP as a result of
the adjustments described above and does not reconcile to its
consolidated audited financial statements included in this
document.
Outstanding
Indebtedness on Existing Credit Facilities and Senior Unsecured
Notes as of June 30, 2011, as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
Amount(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment
|
|
Facility
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Amounts in $000
|
|
|
$1.04 billion credit facility
|
|
$
|
1,040,000
|
|
|
$
|
597,051
|
|
|
|
Q3 2013
|
|
|
$
|
74,551
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
452,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
$495.0 million loan agreement with Drillship Kithira Owners
Inc.
|
|
$
|
495,000
|
|
|
$
|
185,821
|
|
|
|
Q3 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
$495.0 million loan agreement with Drillship Skopelos
Owners Inc.
|
|
$
|
495,000
|
|
|
$
|
86,770
|
|
|
|
Q4 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
31,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
$800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
Q2 2016
|
|
|
$
|
33,333
|
|
|
$
|
66,666
|
|
|
$
|
66,666
|
|
|
$
|
66,666
|
|
$500.0 million of aggregate principal amount of
9.5% senior unsecured notes
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
Q2 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts in table exclude deferred financing costs as of
June 30, 2011 as follows: (a) $3.7 million for
the $1.04 billion credit facility;
(b) $9.9 million for the Deutsche bank loan agreement
with Drillship Kithira Owners Inc.; (c) $7.1 million
for the Deutsche Bank loan agreement with Drillship Skopelos
Owners Inc.; (d) $15.2 million for the
$800 million Nordea credit facility and
(e) $11.2 million for the $500 million of
aggregate principal amount of 9.5% senior unsecured notes. |
166
All of Ocean Rigs various loan agreements contain
covenants, including restrictions without the lenders
prior consent, as to changes in management and ownership of the
drilling units, additional indebtedness and mortgaging of
drilling units and change in the general nature of Ocean
Rigs business.
Existing
Credit Facilities
$1.04 billion
senior secured credit facility
On September 17, 2008, Ocean Rigs wholly-owned
subsidiaries Ocean Rig ASA and Ocean Rig Norway AS entered into
a revolving credit and term loan facility with a syndicate of
lenders that was amended and restated on November 19, 2009,
to, among other things, add Drill Rigs Holdings Inc. as a
borrower. The $1.04 billion credit facility consists of a
guarantee facility, which provides Ocean Rig with a letter of
credit of up to $20.0 million, which has been drawn, three
revolving credit facilities in the amounts of
$350.0 million, $250.0 million and $20.0 million,
respectively, and a term loan in the amount of up to
$400.0 million. This credit facility is in the aggregate
amount of approximately $1.04 billion. On September 30 and
October 10, 2008, Ocean Rig ASA drew down
$750.0 million and $250.0 million, respectively, under
this facility for the repayment of approximately
$776.0 million under a previous credit facility and for
general corporate purposes. Amounts outstanding under the
$1.04 billion credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a
margin and the loan is repayable in 20 quarterly installments
plus a balloon payment of $400.0 million payable together
with the last installment, on September 17, 2013. As of
June 30, 2011 the outstanding balance under this loan
agreement was $597.1 million. Ocean Rig has repaid
approximately $57.1 million under this credit facility in
the third quarter of 2011.
The $1.04 billion credit facility is secured by, among
other things, (i) first and second priority mortgages over
the Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude;
(ii) first and second priority assignment of all insurances
and earnings of the Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik
Raude; (iii) pledges of shares in each of Primelead
Ltd., Ocean Rig 2 AS, Ocean Rig North Sea AS, Ocean Rig Ghana
Limited, Ocean Rig Limited, Ocean Rig 1 Inc., Ocean Rig 2 Inc.,
Ocean Rig 1 Shareholders Inc. and Ocean Rig
2 Shareholders Inc.; and (iv) first and second
mortgages over the machinery and plant of Ocean Rig 1 Inc. and
Ocean Rig 2 Inc.
Under the $1.04 billion credit facility, Drill Rigs
Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries are subject to certain
covenants requiring, among other things, the maintenance of
(i) a minimum amount of free cash; (ii) a leverage
ratio not to exceed specified levels; (iii) a minimum
interest coverage ratio; (iv) a minimum current ratio (the
ratio of current assets to current liabilities); and (v) a
minimum equity ratio (the ratio of value adjusted equity to
value adjusted total assets).
In addition, capital expenditures must not exceed
$50.0 million in any fiscal year and capital expenditures
in excess of $30.0 million require the prior consent of the
lender. Further, the aggregate market value of the Eirik
Raude and the Leiv Eiriksson be at least equal to
135% of the principal amount of the borrowings outstanding under
the term loan facility and of the $350.0 million and
$20.0 million revolving credit facilities.
Furthermore, pursuant to the terms of the $1.04 billion
credit facility, if any person or persons acting in concert
(other than DryShips or other companies controlled by
Mr. Economou, Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of DryShips) obtains either direct or indirect
control of one-third or more of the shares in Drill Rigs
Holdings Inc., notice must be provided to the Agent, who may,
upon the instruction of any lender, cancel all commitments and
declare outstanding loans and accrued interest due and payable.
The $1.04 billion credit facility also contains
restrictions on the ability of Drill Rigs Holdings Inc. to pay
dividends, make distributions to its shareholders, and reduce
share capital without the prior written consent of the lenders
if fewer than six months (excluding options) remains on the term
of the Tullow Oil contract for the Eirik Raude unless
such contract has been replaced with a comparable drilling
services contract for the Eirik Raude with a counterparty
that has a financial standing equal to that of Tullow Oil at the
time the Tullow Oil contract was entered into. As a result,
Drill Rigs Holdings Inc. would not be able to pay dividends
beginning April 2011 unless a suitable replacement contract is
in place at that time.
This loan agreement contains other customary restrictive
covenants and events of default, including non-payment of
principal or interest, breach of covenants or material
representations, bankruptcy and imposes insurance requirements
and restrictions on the employment of the vessels.
167
This credit facility contains a cross-default provision that
applies to Ocean Rig and DryShips. This means that if Ocean Rig
or DryShips default, by way of non-payment of principal and
interest or by way of acceleration or cancellation of debt,
Ocean Rig will be in default of this loan. Ocean Rigs
wholly-owned subsidiary Drill Rigs Holdings Inc. has entered
into three interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest
rate on the principal amounts outstanding under this loan
agreement. See the section of this proxy
statement / prospectus entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Swap
agreements for a description of these interest rate swap
agreements.
Two
$562.5 million senior secured credit facilities, amended to
$495.0 million each (the Deutsche Bank credit
facilities)
On July 18, 2008, Drillship Kithira Owners Inc. and
Drillship Skopelos Owners Inc., Ocean Rigs wholly-owned
subsidiaries and the owners of Ocean Rigs newbuilding
drillships, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, respectively, each entered into separate loan
agreements with a syndicate of lenders, including Deutsche Bank
AG, London Branch, in the amount of $562.5 million to
partially finance (70%) the construction cost of the Ocean
Rig Poseidon and the Ocean Rig Mykonos, including
payment of the loan financing fees, incidental drillship costs,
commitment fees, loan interest, and a portion of the second yard
installments. Ocean Rig refers to these credit facilities as the
Deutsche Bank credit facilities. Both of the loans bear interest
at a rate that is in part fixed and in part based on LIBOR plus
an applicable margin and are repayable in 18 semi-annual
installments of $31.25 million through September 2020 and
November 2020, respectively. These agreements and the waivers
and consents contained therein were terminated pursuant to the
terms of the Supplemental Agreement No. 3, dated
January 29, 2010, to each of these credit facilities
because Ocean Rig, including DryShips, were in compliance with
all of the covenants contained in this loan agreement.
On June 5, 2009, Ocean Rig entered into agreements with the
facility agent and certain other lenders with respect to each of
these credit facilities providing for a waiver of certain
financial covenants through January 31, 2010. These
agreements and the waivers and consents contained therein were
terminated pursuant to the terms of the Supplemental Agreement
No. 3, dated January 29, 2010, to each of these credit
facilities because Ocean Rig and DryShips were in compliance
with all of the covenants contained in this loan agreement. This
credit facility contains a cross-default provision that applies
to Ocean Rig and DryShips. This means that if Ocean Rig or
DryShips default under any of Ocean Rigs other loan
obligations, Ocean Rig will be in default of this loan.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an agreement with
the lenders under its two Deutsche Bank credit facilities to
restructure these facilities. As a result of this restructuring,
(i) the maximum amount permitted to be drawn was reduced
from $562.5 million to $495.0 million under each
facility; (ii) in addition to the guarantee already
provided by DryShips, Ocean Rig provided an unlimited recourse
guarantee that includes certain financial covenants; and
(iii) Ocean Rig is permitted to draw under the facility
with respect to the Ocean Rig Poseidon based upon the
employment of the drillship under its drilling contract with
Petrobras Tanzania, and on April 27, 2010, the cash
collateral deposited for this vessel was released. On
August 10, 2011, Ocean Rig amended the terms of the credit
facility for the construction of the Ocean Rig Mykonos to
allow for full drawdowns to finance the remaining installment
payments for the drillship based on the Petrobras Brazil
contract and on August 10, 2011, the cash collateral
deposited for the drillship was released. The amendment also
requires that the Ocean Rig Mykonos be re-employed under
a contract acceptable to the lenders meeting certain minimum
terms and dayrates at least six months, in lieu of
12 months, prior to the expiration of the Petrobras Brazil
contract. All other material terms of the credit facility were
unchanged.
Each Deutsche Bank loan agreement is secured by, among other
things, a first priority mortgage on the relevant vessel and a
reserve account pledge. Each loan agreement contains a loan to
value covenant relating to the post-delivery market value of the
relevant vessel.
As of June 30, 2011, the outstanding balance under the
Deutsche Bank credit facilities was $272.6 million.
These loan agreements are guaranteed by DryShips. The guarantee
covers the initial equity contribution and each other equity
contribution, the equity collateral, amounts to be paid into the
debt service reserve account and each payment of the loan
balance. The guarantee by DryShips contains certain financial
covenants measured on the DryShips financial accounts requiring
the maintenance of (i) a minimum market adjusted equity
ratio; (ii) a
168
minimum interest coverage ratio; (iii) a minimum market
value adjusted net worth of DryShips and its subsidiaries; and
(iv) a minimum amount of free cash and cash equivalents.
In addition, as noted above, Ocean Rig provided an unlimited
recourse guarantee under the terms of the restructuring of these
loan agreements whereby Ocean Rig is required to comply with
certain financial covenants requiring that Ocean Rig maintains
(i) a minimum equity ratio; (ii) a minimum amount of
working capital; (iii) a maximum leverage ratio;
(iv) a minimum interest coverage ratio; and (v) a
minimum amount of free cash.
The loan agreements contain customary restrictive covenants and
events of default, including non-payment of principal or
interest, minimum insurance requirements, breach of covenants or
material misrepresentations, bankruptcy, and change of control
and impose restrictions on the payments of dividends and
employment of the vessels.
In addition, due to the cross-default provisions in these credit
facilities, a default by DryShips under one of its loan
agreements would trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs
Deutsche Bank credit facilities and would provide its lenders
with the right to accelerate the outstanding debt under these
facilities. Further, if DryShips defaults under one of its loan
agreements, and the related debt is accelerated, this would
trigger a cross-default under Ocean Rigs
$1.04 billion credit facility and Ocean Rigs
$800.0 million secured term loan agreement and would
provide Ocean Rigs lenders with the right to accelerate
the outstanding debt under these facilities.
Ocean Rig has entered into eight interest rate swap agreements
to fix the interest rate payable on the principal amounts
outstanding under the Deutsche Bank credit facilities. See the
section of this proxy statement / prospectus entitled
Ocean Rig Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Swap
Agreements for a description of these interest rate swap
agreements.
$800.0 million
senior secured term loan agreement
On April 15, 2011, Ocean Rigs wholly-owned subsidiary
Drillships Holdings Inc., or Drillships Holdings, entered into a
$800 million senior secured term loan agreement with a
syndicate of lenders to fund a portion of the construction of
the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia.
The $800 million senior secured term loan agreement
consists of four term loans, which were all fully drawn in April
2011. A portion of the loans was used to refinance the
$325 million short term loan facility, as discussed below.
Amounts outstanding under the $800 million senior secured
term loan agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin and the
loan is repayable in 20 quarterly installments plus a balloon
payment of $488.3 million payable together with the last
installment payment.
The $800 million senior secured term loan agreement is
secured by, among other things, the first priority rights to
(i) the mortgages over the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Ocean Rig Olympia, (ii) the assignment of
earnings, (iii) the assignment of earnings accounts,
(iv) the minimum cash accounts, (v) the insurances,
and (vi) the share charges.
Under the $800 million senior secured term loan agreement,
Ocean Rig and certain of its subsidiaries, as guarantors, are
subject to certain covenants requiring among other things, the
maintenance of (i) a minimum amount of free cash;
(ii) a leverage ratio not to exceed specified levels;
(iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio; (iv) a
minimum current ratio; and (v) a minimum equity ratio. In
addition, DryShips, as guarantor, must maintain (i) minimum
liquidity; (ii) a minimum interest coverage ratio;
(iii) a minimum market adjusted equity ratio; and
(iv) a minimum market value adjusted net worth. Further,
the aggregate market value of the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Ocean Rig Olympia must be greater than 140% of the
borrowings outstanding under the senior secured term loan.
Also, the $800 million senior secured term loan agreement
restricts Ocean Rigs and Drillships Holdings ability
to pay dividends, make any distribution to its shareholders or
buy-back common stock, except for dividends paid by Drillships
Holdings to Ocean Rig from the first distribution and relating
to the refinancing of capital expenditures for the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia. Furthermore,
pursuant to the terms of the $800 million senior secured
term loan agreement, if, after an initial public offering, any
person or group (other than Mr. Economou and DryShips)
acquire beneficial ownership of more than 50% of Ocean
Rigs equity, or, if Mr. Economou and DryShips fails
(i) prior to an initial public offering, to hold 65% of the
aggregate ordinary voting power and economic interest in us; or
(ii) after an initial public offering, to hold 15%
aggregate ordinary voting
169
power and economic interest in Ocean Rig, then all outstanding
amounts under the $800 million senior secured term loan
agreement are required to be prepaid within 60 days.
The $800 million senior secured term loan agreement
contains other customary restrictive covenants and events of
default, including non-payment of principal or interest, breach
of covenants or material representations, bankruptcy and imposes
insurance requirements and restrictions on the employment of the
vessels.
The $800 million senior secured term loan agreement
contains a cross-default provision that applies to Ocean Rig and
DryShips, as guarantor. This means that if Ocean Rig or DryShips
default, by way of non-payment of principal or interest or by
way of acceleration or cancellation of debt, Ocean Rig will be
in default of this loan.
9.5% senior
unsecured notes due 2016
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig completed the issuance of
$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of its
9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016 in an offering made to
both
non-United
States persons in Norway in reliance on Regulation S under
the Securities Act and to qualified institutional buyers in the
U.S. in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act, or
the notes offering. Ocean Rig received net proceeds from the
notes offering of approximately $487.5 million, which Ocean
Rig expects to use to finance a portion of the remaining
payments under its newbuiliding program and for general
corporate purposes. DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent company,
purchased $75.0 million of Ocean Rigs
9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016 from a third party on
May 18, 2011.
Under the terms of the bond agreement, dated April 14,
2011, Ocean Rig will pay interest on the notes at a rate of 9.5%
per annum. Ocean Rig will make interest payments on the notes
semi-annually in arrears on October 27 and April 27 of each
year, beginning October 27, 2011 until the notes
final maturity on April 27, 2016. Interest will accrue from
the issue date of the notes. The notes will not be guaranteed by
any of Ocean Rigs subsidiaries. The notes will be Ocean
Rigs unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of
payment to any of Ocean Rigs future subordinated
indebtedness and equally in right of payment to all of its
existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness. Ocean Rig may
redeem some or all of the notes as follows: (i) at any time
and from time to time from April 27, 2014 to April 26,
2015, at a redemption price equal to 104.5% of the aggregate
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date
of redemption; or (ii) at any time and from time to time
from April 27, 2015 at a redemption price equal to 102.5%
of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption. Upon a change of control,
which occurs if 50% or more of Ocean Rigs shares are
acquired by any person or group other than DryShips or its
affiliates, the noteholders will have an option to require Ocean
Rig to purchase all outstanding notes at a redemption price of
100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of purchase.
Subject to a number of limitations and exceptions, the bond
agreement governing the notes contains covenants limiting, among
other things, Ocean Rigs ability to: (i) create
liens; or (ii) merge, or consolidate or transfer, sell or
lease all or substantially all of its assets. Furthermore, the
bond agreement contains financial covenants requiring Ocean Rig,
among other things, to ensure that it maintains: (i) a
consolidated equity ratio of minimum 35%; (ii) free cash of
minimum $50 million; (iii) current ratio of minimum
1-to-1; and (iv) an interest coverage ratio of 2.5x
calculated on a 12 month rolling basis.
The notes are a new issue of securities. In connection with the
issue, Ocean Rig has agreed to apply to list the notes on a
securities exchange or other regulated market by
December 1, 2011 and to list its common shares on a
recognized exchange by the end of the third quarter of 2011.
Ocean Rig has obtained a credit rating on the company and the
notes in compliance with the loan agreement. If Ocean Rig had
failed to obtain the required credit ratings, the interest rate
on the notes would have increased by 0.25% annually.
Repaid
Credit Facilities
$325.0 million
short-term loan facility
On December 21, 2010, Drillship Hydra Owners Inc. entered
into a $325.0 million short-term loan facility with a
syndicate of lenders for the purpose of (i) meeting the
ongoing working capital needs of Drillships Hydra Owners Inc.;
(ii) financing the partial repayment of existing debt in
relation to the purchase of the Ocean Rig Corcovado; and
(iii) financing the payment of the final installment
associated with the purchase of said drillship. This loan
170
facility was repayable in full in June 2011 and bore interest at
a rate of LIBOR plus a margin. Ocean Rig drew down the full
amount of this loan on January 5, 2011 and Ocean Rig repaid
the full amount of this loan on April 20, 2011 with
borrowings under the $800.0 million senior secured term
loan agreement.
This loan agreement was secured by, among other things, a first
priority mortgage on the Ocean Rig Corcovado. This loan
agreement was guaranteed by DryShips and by Ocean Rig and
contained certain financial covenants measured on the DryShips
financial accounts. The loan agreement contained customary
restrictive covenants and events of default, including
non-payment of principal or interest, breach of covenants or
material misrepresentations, bankruptcy, change of control and
imposes restrictions on the payments of dividends and employment
of the vessels.
$230.0 million
loan facilities, dated September 10, 2007, as
amended
In connection with the acquisition of Drillships Holdings on
May 15, 2009, Ocean Rig assumed two $115 million loan
facilities that were entered into in September 2007, in order to
finance the construction of the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Ocean Rig Olympia. The loans bore interest at LIBOR
plus margin. Ocean Rig repaid one $115.0 million term loan
facility in December 2010 in connection with the delivery of the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and repaid the other
$115.0 million facility in March 2011 upon the delivery of
the Ocean Rig Olympia. In addition to the customary
security and guarantees issued to the borrower, these facilities
were collateralized by certain vessels owned by certain related
parties, corporate guarantees of certain related parties, and a
personal guarantee from Mr. Economou.
As of December 31, 2010 Ocean Rig had outstanding
borrowings in the amount of $115.0 million under these loan
facilities, which were repaid on March 18, 2011, as
described above.
$300.0 million
short-term facility
On December 28, 2010, Ocean Rig entered into a
$300 million short-term overdraft facility with a lender,
which Ocean Rig drew down in full on December 28, 2010. The
proceeds of this loan were blocked as security for the loan. The
loan was repaid on January 3, 2011 with the cash
collateral. The short-term overdraft facility cannot be re-drawn.
Shareholder
loans from DryShips
During April 2011, Ocean Rig borrowed an aggregate of
$48.1 million from DryShips through shareholder loans for
capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. On
April 20, 2011, these intercompany loans, along with
shareholder loans of $127.5 million that Ocean Rig borrowed
from DryShips in March 2011, were fully repaid. As of the date
of this proxy statement / prospectus, no loan balance
exists between Ocean Rig and DryShips.
171
OCEAN RIG
MANAGEMENT
Ocean Rig
Directors and Senior Management
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of Ocean
Rigs directors and executive officers and the principal
officers of certain of Ocean Rigs operating subsidiaries.
Members of Ocean Rigs board of directors are elected
annually on a staggered basis. Each director elected holds
office for a three-year term and until his successor shall have
been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of his
death, resignation, removal, or the earlier termination of his
term of office. The initial term of office of each director is
as follows: Ocean Rigs Class A director serves for a
term expiring at the 2011 annual general meeting of
shareholders, Ocean Rigs two Class B directors serve
for a term expiring at the 2012 annual general meeting of
shareholders and Ocean Rigs two Class C directors
serve for a term expiring at the 2013 annual general meeting of
shareholders. Officers are appointed from time to time by Ocean
Rigs board of directors, or Ocean Rigs relevant
subsidiary, as applicable, and hold office until a successor is
appointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers of Ocean Rig
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
George Economou
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Class A Director
|
Michael Gregos
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Class B Director
|
Trygve Arnesen
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Class C Director
|
Savvas D. Georghiades
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Class C Director
|
Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Class B Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Officers of Operating Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Paul Carsten Pedersen
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Acting Chief Executive Officer
|
Jan Rune Steinsland
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Frank Tollefsen
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Officer
|
John Rune Hellevik
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Marketing & Contracts
|
Ronald Coull
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
|
Rolf Håkon Holmboe
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Vice President, Quality, Health, Safety, Environment &
Training
|
The business address of each of Ocean Rigs directors and
principal officers is 10 Skopa Street, Tribune House,
2nd Floor, Office 202, CY 1075, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Biographical information with respect to the above individuals
is set forth below.
George Economou was appointed as Ocean Rigs
President and Chief Executive Officer on September 2, 2010,
and Chairman and director in December 2010. Mr. Economou
has over 25 years of experience in the maritime industry.
He has served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of DryShips since January 2005. He successfully took DryShips
public in February 2005, on NASDAQ under the trading symbol
DRYS. Mr. Economou has overseen the growth of
DryShips into one of the largest
U.S.-listed
dry bulk companies in fleet size and revenue and one of the
largest Panamax owners in the world. Mr. Economou began his
career in 1976 when he commenced working as a Superintendent
Engineer in Thenamaris Ship Management in Greece. From
1981-1986 he
held the position of General Manager of Oceania Maritime Agency
in New York. Between 1986 and 1991 he invested and participated
in the formation of numerous individual shipping companies and
in 1991 he founded Cardiff Marine Inc., Group of Companies.
Mr. Economou is a member of ABS Council, Intertanko
Hellenic Shipping Forum, and Lloyds Register Hellenic Advisory
Committee. Mr. Economou is a graduate of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and holds both a Bachelor of Science and
a Master of Science degree in Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering and a Master of Science in Shipping and Shipbuilding
Management.
172
Michael Gregos was appointed to Ocean Rigs
board of directors in December 2010. Mr. Gregos is Project
Manager for Dynacom Tankers Management Ltd. which he joined in
2001. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Gregos was employed as Chief
Operating Officer by OceanFreight Inc. Prior to that period, he
worked for a shipping concern based in Athens and New York for
five years and the Corporate Finance arm of a Greek bank for one
year. He is a graduate of Queen Mary University in London and
holds an M.Sc. in Shipping, Trade and Finance from City
University.
Trygve Arnesen was appointed to Ocean Rigs
board of directors in December 2010. Mr. Arnesen is a
director for Aftermarket Eastern Region with FMC Technologies, a
position he has held since August 2010. Mr. Arnesen holds
an M.Sc. in petroleum engineering and applied geophysics from
the Norwegian University of Science and Technology from 1980. He
has worked in the drilling and oil service industry since 1982,
and has held a broad range of positions with various companies
including Wilhelmsen
(1982-1984),
Morco&Ross
(1984-1985),
Norcem / Aker Drilling
(1985-1989),
Saga (1989), Transocean / Procon / Prosafe
(1990-1992
and
1994-2005),
Shell
(1992-1994),
and Odfjell
(2005-2006).
From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Arnesen was the Chief Executive
Officer of Ocean Rig ASA, Ocean Rigs predecessor, and he
worked as Chief Executive Officer for Norwind from 2008 until
2010.
Savvas Georghiades was appointed to Ocean
Rigs board of directors in December 2010.
Mr. Georghiades has been a practicing lawyer in Cyprus
since 1976. He is a graduate of the Aristotle University in
Thessaloniki.
Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis has been appointed to
serve on Ocean Rigs board of directors effective
September 12, 2011. Mr. Tsirigakis serves as Chairman
of the Board of Directors, President and Co-Chief Executive
Officer of Nautilus Marine Acquisition Corp., a newly-organized
blank check company formed for the purpose of acquiring one or
more operating businesses or assets. In November 2007 he
founded, and until February 2011 was the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Star Bulk Carriers Corp. a dry-bulk
shipping company listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ:
SBLK) that owns and manages vessels aggregating in excess of
1.2 million deadweight tons of cargo capacity. He has
served as a director of Star Bulk Carriers Corp. since November
2007. From May 2005 till November 2007 he founded and served as
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
Star Maritime Acquisition Corp. (AMEX: SEA). Mr. Tsirigakis
is experienced in ship ownership, ship management and new
shipbuilding projects. Mr. Tsirigakis formerly served on
the board of directors of DryShips. Since November 2003, he
served as Managing Director of Oceanbulk Maritime S.A., a dry
cargo shipping company that has operated and managed vessels.
From November 1998 till November 2007, Mr. Tsirigakis
served as the Managing Director of Combine Marine Inc., a
company which he founded and that is providing ship management
services to third parties. From 1991 to 1998,
Mr. Tsirigakis was the Vice-President and Technical
Director of Konkar Shipping Agencies S.A. of Athens, after
having served as Konkars Technical Director from 1984 to
1991; the company at the time managed 16 dry bulk carriers,
multi-purpose vessels and tanker/combination carriers. From 1982
to 1984, Mr. Tsirigakis was the Technical Manager of
Konkars affiliate, Arkon Shipping Agencies Inc. of New
York. He is a life-member of The Propeller Club of the United
States, a member of the Technical Committee (CASTEC) of
Intercargo, the International Association of Dry Cargo
Shipowners, President of the Hellenic Technical Committee of
RINA, the Italian Classification Society and member of the
Technical Committees of various Classification Societies.
Mr. Tsirigakis received his Masters and B.Sc. in Naval
Architecture from The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and has
seagoing experience.
Paul Carsten Pedersen has been the Acting Chief
Executive Officer of Ocean Rig AS since February 2011. Prior to
joining Ocean Rig AS, Mr. Pedersen spent 29 years at
A.P. Moeller-Maersk, where he held a series of positions with
increasing responsibilities in the offshore drilling and
corporate mergers and acquisitions areas. From 1994 to 1996,
Mr. Pedersen served as director of Maersk Tankers, where he
focused on the development of floating production storage and
offloading, or FPSO, activities. From 1996 to 1998,
Mr. Pedersen served as director of Maersk Contractors,
where he was involved in the commercial operations of FPSO
activities. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Pedersen served as Vice
President and Chief Commercial Officer of Maersk Contractors and
from 2000 to 2003, Mr. Pedersen served as Vice President of
Maersk Corporate. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Pedersen served as
the Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Deputy
Chief Executive Officer, where he managed drilling and FPSO
activities, and from 2009 to 2010, he served as the Senior Vice
President and Chief Executive Officer for Maersk FPSOs and
Maersk LNG. Mr. Pedersen holds a masters degree in
mechanical engineering from The Technical University of Denmark
and has supplemented his education with executive management
courses in
173
Denmark and in the United States at Columbia Business School and
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Jan Rune Steinsland is the Chief Financial Officer
of Ocean Rig AS and joined the Ocean Rig group of companies in
2006. Mr. Steinsland has 17 years of experience from
various positions in the energy and drilling industry and eight
years of experience in the finance and technology industries.
From 2000 to 2006, Mr. Steinsland was Chief Financial
Officer of the Oslo Børs-listed Acta Holding ASA. From 1988
to 2000, Mr. Steinsland held several management positions
in Esso Norge AS/Exxon Company International, including
Financial Analyst, Financial Reporting Manager, Vice President
Accounting, Project Controller and Audit Advisor.
Mr. Steinsland has a Master of Business Administration from
the University of St. Gallen Switzerland and is a Certified
European Financial Analyst (AFA) from The Norwegian Society of
Financial Analysts/Norwegian School of Economics and Business
Administration.
Frank Tollefsen has been with Ocean Rig since
January 2004 and served as the Senior Vice President Operations
of Ocean Rig AS from March 2007 to January 2011.
Mr. Tollefsen was promoted Chief Operating Officer (COO)
and Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Ocean Rig AS as of
February 1, 2011. Mr. Tollefsen has 26 years of
experience from various positions in the drilling contracting
business. From 1990 Mr. Tollefsen has had leading positions
in the North Sea, Nigeria, Houston, Texas, Brazil, Canada, and
the Middle East region as well as India and the Mediterranean.
Prior to joining Ocean Rig AS, he spent 13 years with
Transocean Ltd. Prior to that, Mr. Tollefsen served six
years with Dolphin Drilling. Mr. Tollefsen is a mechanical
engineer.
John Rune Hellevik has served as the Senior Vice
President Marketing and Contracts of Ocean Rig AS since 2007.
Mr. Hellevik has 30 years experience in the offshore
business, both from oil companies and contractors. From 1986 to
1995, Mr. Hellevik held various management positions within
procurement and marketing in Smedvig Offshore ASA and Scana
Offshore Technology. During the period from 1995 to 2006,
Mr. Hellevik held management positions within procurement,
marketing and contracts of Transocean ASA and Prosafe ASA.
Mr. Hellevik received a degree in Business Administration
from Bedriftsøkonomisk Institutt (BI), Norway.
Ronald Coull has served as the Senior Vice
President Human Resources of the Ocean Rig group of companies
since June 2009. He has worked in the oil and gas sector for
over 20 years with extensive experience in both generalist
human resources management and recruitment. Prior to joining
Ocean Rig, Mr. Coull worked for Petrofac facilities
management for ten years where his roles included Operations
Director of Atlantic Resourcing Ltd, which is a part of the
Petrofac group of companies, where Mr. Coull was
responsible for the operational and financial performance of
this business. This included working with a number of external
companies delivering innovative recruitment solutions to the
drilling, marine and operations business. Prior to this, he was
Human Resources Director & Head of Human Resources for
Petrofac Facilities Management in Aberdeen, which had a global
workforce of 4,500 employees, with responsibility for
providing full human resource support to the business in the
North Sea, and for international contracts in Europe, Middle
East and Africa and Asia Pacific. Prior to that, Mr. Coull
spent three years with Kvaerner Oil & Gas as Human
Resources Manager providing HR support to a workforce of
approximately 1,800 employees. In addition, he held Senior
HR roles in the offshore oil and gas industry at Trafalger House
Offshore Holdings (two years) and Vauldale Engineering (ten
years).
Rolf Håkon Holmboe has served as the Vice
President Quality, Health, Safety, Environment &
Training of Ocean Rig AS since January 2010 and has worked in
the area of health, safety, environment and quality in the oil
and gas sector for 19 years. From 1991 to 1997,
Mr. Holmboe worked for Det Norske Veritas before joining
Statoil, where he was employed for 12 years from 1997 to
2009. Mr. Holmboes areas of experience include
emergency preparedness, risk analyses, health, safety and
environment management, operational safety and incident
investigations. Mr. Holmboe is a Chemical Engineer,
graduated from Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, in 1990.
Compensation
of Directors and Senior Management
The aggregate annual compensation paid by Ocean Rig to the
members of the senior management of its subsidiaries (six
individuals) was $2.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010, consisting of $2.7 million in
salary and bonus, pension contribution of $0.2 million and
other benefits. Ocean Rigs non-employee directors are each
entitled to receive annual directors fees of $20,000, such
amount to be pro-rated for any portion of a full calendar year
that a non-employee director is a member of Ocean Rigs
board of directors, plus reimbursement for
174
actual expenses incurred while acting in their capacity as
director. In addition, the chairmen of the committees of Ocean
Rigs board of directors receive annual fees of $10,000,
such amount to be pro-rated for any portion of the full calendar
year that the director is chairman of the committee, plus
reimbursement for actual expenses incurred while acting in their
capacity as chairman. Ocean Rig does not maintain a medical,
dental, or retirement plan for its directors. Members of Ocean
Rigs senior management who also serve as directors will
not receive additional compensation for their services as
directors.
Board of
Directors and Committees
The board of directors of Ocean Rig consists of five directors,
three of whom Ocean Rigs board of directors has determined
to be independent under
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act and the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market:
Messrs. Gregos, Arnesen, and Tsirigakis. Under the NASDAQ
corporate governance rules, a director is not considered
independent unless the board of directors of Ocean Rig
affirmatively determines that the director has no direct or
indirect material relationship with Ocean Rig or its affiliates
that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the exercise
of such directors independent judgment. In making this
determination, the Ocean Rig board of directors broadly
considers all facts and circumstances it deems relevant from the
standpoint of the director and from that of persons or
organizations with which the director has an affiliation.
Ocean Rigs board of directors has established an audit
committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and
corporate governance committee, in each case comprised of
independent directors.
Ocean Rigs audit committee, among other things, reviews
Ocean Rigs external financial reporting, engages its
external auditors and oversees its internal audit activities,
procedures and the adequacy of its internal accounting controls.
Messrs. Gregos, Arnesen and Tsirigakis serve as members of
the audit committee. Mr. Tsirigakis serves as Chairman of
the audit committee.
Ocean Rigs compensation committee is responsible for
establishing directors and executive officers compensation
and benefits and reviewing and making recommendations to the
board of directors regarding Ocean Rigs compensation
policies. Messrs. Gregos, Arnesen and Tsirigakis serve as
members of the compensation committee. Mr. Gregos serves as
Chairman of the compensation committee.
Ocean Rigs nominating and corporate governance committee
is responsible for recommending to the board of directors
nominees for director and directors for appointment to
committees of the board of directors and advising the board of
directors with regard to corporate governance practices.
Shareholders may also nominate directors in accordance with
procedures set forth in Ocean Rigs second amended and
restated bylaws. Messrs. Gregos, Arnesen and Tsirigakis
serve as members of the nominating and corporate governance
committee. Mr. Arnesen serves as Chairman of the nominating
and corporate governance committee.
Ocean Rig
Employment Agreements
Ocean Rigs predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, entered into an
employment agreement, dated as of May 15, 2006, with
Mr. Jan Rune Steinsland for his services as Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to which Mr. Steinsland receives a fixed
annual salary and may receive a bonus through the management
bonus plan. The agreement continues until terminated by either
party on six-months notice. In addition,
Mr. Steinsland is entitled to participation in Ocean
Rigs pension scheme. In the case of his termination,
except for reasons of gross breach of contract,
Mr. Steinsland is entitled to twelve months salary,
payable in monthly installments following termination. As of
December 1, 2008, Mr. Steinslands employment
contract was amended to transfer Mr. Steinslands
employment from Ocean Rig ASA to Ocean Rig AS pursuant to the
same terms and conditions described above.
Ocean Rigs predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, entered into an
employment agreement, dated January 8, 2004, with
Mr. Frank Tollefsen for his services as Senior Vice
President Operations from January 19, 2004. The agreement
continues until terminated by either party on three months
notice. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Tollefsen receives a
fixed annual salary and may receive a bonus through the Ocean
Rig management bonus plan as well as a stay on bonus
of six-months salary paid every three years. In addition
Mr. Tollefsen is entitled to participation in Ocean
Rigs pension scheme.
175
Ocean Rig AS entered into an employment agreement, dated
September 15, 2007, with Mr. John Rune Hellevik for
his services as Senior Vice President Contracts and Procurement
from January 1, 2007. The agreement continues until
terminated by either party on three-months notice.
Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Hellevik receives a fixed
annual salary and may receive a bonus through the Ocean Rig
management bonus plan. In addition Mr. Hellevik is entitled
to participation in Ocean Rigs pension scheme.
Ocean Rig Ltd entered into an employment agreement, dated
February 8, 2010, with Mr. Ronald Coull for his
services as Senior Vice President Human Resources from
June 15, 2009. The agreement continues until terminated by
either party on six-months notice. Pursuant to the
agreement, Mr. Coull receives a fixed annual salary and may
receive a bonus through the Ocean Rig management bonus plan. In
addition Mr. Coull is entitled to participation in Ocean
Rigs pension scheme. In the case of his termination,
Mr. Coull is entitled to six months notice and six
months salary, which will increase by one month per year
of service up to a maximum of 12 months salary.
Ocean Rig AS entered into an employment agreement, dated
September 28, 2009, with Mr. Rolf Håkon Holmboe
for his services as Vice President Health, Safety,
Environment & Quality from January 1, 2010. The
agreement continues until terminated by either party on
three-months notice. Pursuant to the agreement,
Mr. Holmboe receives a fixed annual salary and may receive
a bonus through the Ocean Rig management bonus program. In
addition Mr. Holmboe is entitled to participation in Ocean
Rigs pension scheme.
OCEAN RIG
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
All Ocean Rig related party transactions will be subject to the
review and approval of the independent members of Ocean
Rigs board of directors.
Ocean Rig
Related Party Agreements
Ocean
Rig Management Agreements with Cardiff Management
Fees to Related Party
From October 19, 2007 to December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig
was party to, with respect to the Ocean Rig Corcovado and
the Ocean Rig Olympia, separate management agreements
with Cardiff, a party affiliated with Ocean Rigs Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Office, Mr. Economou,
pursuant to which Cardiff provided additional supervisory
services in connection with said drillships including, among
other things: (i) assisting in securing the required equity
for the construction; (ii) negotiating, reviewing and
proposing finance terms; (iii) assisting in marketing
towards potential contractors; (iv) assisting in arranging,
reviewing and supervising all aspects of building, equipment,
financing, accounting, record keeping, compliance with laws and
regulations; (v) assisting in procuring consultancy
services from specialists; and (vi) assisting in finding
prospective joint-venture partners and negotiating any such
agreements. Pursuant to the management agreements, Ocean Rig
paid Cardiff a management fee of $40,000 per month per drillship
plus (i) a chartering commission of 1.25% on revenue
earned; (ii) a commission of 1.0% on the shipyard payments
or purchase price paid for drillships; (iii) a commission
of 1.0% on loan financing; and (iv) a commission of 2.0% on
insurance premiums. During the six-months ended June 30,
2010 and 2011, total charges from Cardiff under the management
agreements amounted to $2.6 million and $5.8 million,
respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009
and 2010, total charges incurred by Ocean Rig from Cardiff under
the management agreements amounted to $0.0 million,
$1.9 million and $4.0 million, respectively. This was
capitalized as drillship under construction cost, being a cost
directly attributable to the construction of the two drillships,
the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia.
In accordance with the Addenda No. 1 to the above
management agreements, dated as of December 1, 2010, by and
between Cardiff and Ocean Rigs respective drillship-owning
subsidiaries, the management agreements were terminated
effective December 21, 2010; however, all obligations to
pay for services rendered by Cardiff prior to termination remain
in effect. As of December 31, 2010, these obligations
totaled $5.8 million.
Acquisition
of Ocean Rig ASA
Ocean Rigs wholly-owned subsidiary, Primelead Limited, a
corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus,
was formed on November 16, 2007 for the purpose of
acquiring shares of Ocean Rig ASA. On December 20, 2007,
Primelead Limited acquired 51,778,647 shares, or
approximately 30.4% of the outstanding
176
capital stock of Ocean Rig ASA following its nomination as a
buyer from Cardiff, for which Cardiff received a commission of
$4.1 million on February 1, 2008. Ocean Rig was formed
under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on
December 10, 2007 under the name Primelead Shareholders
Inc. Ocean Rig acquired all of the outstanding shares of
Primelead Limited in December 2007 in a transaction under common
control, which was accounted for as a pooling of interests. In
April 2008, 7,546,668 shares, representing 4.4% of the
share capital of Ocean Rig ASA, were purchased from companies
controlled by Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Economou, for consideration of
$66.8 million, which is the U.S. Dollar equivalent of
NOK45 per share and was the price offered to all shareholders in
the mandatory offering. After acquiring more than 33% of Ocean
Rig ASAs outstanding shares on April 22, 2008, Ocean
Rig launched a mandatory bid for the remaining shares of Ocean
Rig ASA at a price of NOK45 per share, or $8.89 per share, as
required by Norwegian law. Ocean Rig gained control over Ocean
Rig ASA on May 14, 2008. The results of operations related
to the acquisition are included in the consolidated financial
statements as of May 15, 2008. Ocean Rig held 100% of the
shares of Ocean Rig ASA, or 163.6 million shares, as of
July 10, 2008. A commission of $9.9 million was paid
to Cardiff on December 5, 2008 for services rendered in
relation to Ocean Rigs acquisition of the remaining shares
in Ocean Rig ASA.
Acquisition
of the owning companies for the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the
Ocean Rig Olympia
On October 3, 2008, Ocean Rig entered into a share purchase
agreement to acquire the equity interests of the companies
owning the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig
Olympia, which were controlled by clients of Cardiff,
including certain entities affiliated with Mr. Economou. As
part of this transaction, Ocean Rig assumed the liabilities for
two $115.0 million loan facilities which, in addition to
the customary security and guarantees issued to the borrower,
were collateralized by certain vessels owned by certain parties
affiliated with Mr. Economou, corporate guarantees of
certain entities affiliated with Mr. Economou and a
personal guarantee from Mr. Economou. Ocean Rig repaid one
of the $115.0 million loan facilities in December 2010 in
connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig Corcovado.
On May 15, 2009, the acquisition described above closed. As
consideration for this acquisition, Ocean Rig issued to the
sellers the number of common shares equal to 25% of its total
issued and outstanding common shares as of May 15, 2009.
On July 15, 2009, DryShips acquired the remaining 25% of
Ocean Rigs total issued and outstanding capital stock from
the minority interests held by certain unrelated entities and
certain parties related to Mr. Economou. The consideration
paid for the 25% interest consisted of a one-time
$50.0 million cash payment and the issuance of DryShips
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with an aggregate face
value of $280.0 million. Following such acquisition, Ocean
Rig became a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips until December
2010 when Ocean Rig offered and sold an aggregate of 28,571,428
of its common shares in the private offering.
Purchase
of Drillship Options from DryShips
On November 22, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into a contract with Samsung that granted
DryShips options for the construction of up to four additional
ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos with certain upgrades to vessel design
and specifications. The option agreement required DryShips to
pay a non-refundable slot reservation fee of $24.8 million
per drillship. The option agreement was novated by DryShips to
Ocean Rig on December 30, 2010, at a cost of
$99.0 million, which Ocean Rig paid from the net proceeds
of a private offering of its common shares that Ocean Rig
completed in December 2010. In addition, Ocean Rig paid
additional deposits totaling $20.0 million to Samsung in
the first quarter of 2011 to maintain favorable costs and yard
slot timing under the option contract.
On May 16, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an addendum to the
option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which Samsung granted
Ocean Rig the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to Ocean Rigs drillships and
Ocean Rigs seventh generation hulls, with certain upgrades
to vessel design and specifications. Ocean Rig did not make slot
reservation payments in connection with its entry into this
addendum.
177
As of the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
Ocean Rig has exercised three of the six options and, as a
result, has entered into shipbuilding contracts for its seventh
generation hulls with deliveries scheduled in July 2013,
September 2013 and November 2013, respectively. Ocean Rig made
payments of $632.4 million to the shipyard in the second
quarter of 2011 in connection with its exercise of the two
newbuilding drillship options. The estimated total project cost
per drillship is $638.0 million, which consists of
$570.0 million of construction costs, costs of
approximately $38.0 million for upgrades to the existing
drillship specifications and construction-related expenses of
$30.0 million. These upgrades include a 7 ram BOP, a dual
mud system and, with the purchase of additional equipment, the
capability to drill up to 12,000 feet water depth.
Ocean Rig may exercise the three remaining newbuilding drillship
options at any time on or prior to January 31, 2012, with
vessel deliveries ranging from the first to the third quarter of
2014, depending on when the options are exercised. Ocean Rig
estimates the total project cost, excluding financing costs, for
the remaining three optional drillships to be
$638.0 million per drillship, based on the construction and
construction-related expenses for Ocean Rigs seventh
generation hulls described above.
As part of the novation of the contract described above, the
benefit of the slot reservation fees passed to Ocean Rig. The
amount of the slot reservation fees for the seventh generation
hulls has been applied towards the drillship contract prices and
the amount of the slot reservation fees applicable to one of the
remaining three newbuilding drillship options will be applied
towards the drillship contract price if the option is exercised.
Ocean
Rig Legal Services
Mr. Savvas D. Georghiades, a member of Ocean Rigs
board of directors, provides legal services to Ocean Rig and to
its predecessor, Primelead Limited, through his law firm, Savvas
D. Georghiades, Law Office. In the six-months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, Ocean Rig paid a fee of
33,145 and 47,390, respectively, for the legal
services provided by Mr. Georghiades. For the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, Ocean Rig paid a fee of
94,235, 0 and 0, respectively, for the legal
services provided by Mr. Georghiades.
Ocean
Rig Loans and Guarantees
During March and April 2011, Ocean Rig borrowed an aggregate of
$175.5 million from DryShips through shareholder loans for
capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. On
April 20, 2011, these intercompany loans were repaid. As of
the date of this proxy statement / prospectus, no
balance exists between Ocean Rig and DryShips.
$230.0 million
credit facility
On January 23, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into a guarantee and indemnity in connection
with Ocean Rigs $230.0 million credit facility. Under
the DryShips guarantee, DryShips is required to meet financial
covenants requiring DryShips to maintain a minimum
(i) market adjusted equity ratio; (ii) interest
coverage ratio; and (iii) market value adjusted net worth.
Ocean Rig repaid this facility in March 2011.
$562.5 million
loan agreements, amended to $495.0 million (the Deutsche
Bank credit facilities)
On July 18, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into guarantees in connection with Ocean
Rigs Deutsche Bank credit facilities. The guarantees by
DryShips cover the initial equity contribution and each other
equity contribution, the equity collateral, amounts to be paid
into the debt service reserve account and each payment of the
loan balance. In addition, the guarantees by DryShips contain
certain financial covenants measured on the DryShips financial
accounts requiring the maintenance of (i) minimum market
adjusted equity ratio; (ii) minimum interest coverage
ratio; (iii) minimum market value adjusted net worth of
DryShips and its subsidiaries; and (iv) minimum amount of
free cash and cash equivalents.
On April 27, 2011, Ocean Rig entered into an amendment
agreement with all lenders to restructure the Deutsche Bank
credit facilities. Under the terms of the amendment agreement,
in addition to the guarantee provided by DryShips discussed
above, Ocean Rig provided an unlimited recourse guarantee that
includes certain financial
178
covenants requiring Ocean Rig to maintain (i) a minimum
equity ratio; (ii) a minimum amount of working capital;
(iii) a maximum leverage ratio; (iv) a minimum
interest coverage ratio; and (v) a minimum amount of free
cash.
$800.0 million
senior secured term loan agreement
Ocean Rigs $800.0 million senior secured term loan
agreement is guaranteed by Ocean Rig and by DryShips. Under the
loan agreement, Ocean Rig is subject to certain covenants
requiring, among other things, the maintenance of (i) a
minimum amount of free cash; (ii) a leverage ratio not to
exceed specified levels; (iii) a minimum interest coverage
ratio; (iv) a minimum current ratio; and (v) a minimum
equity ratio. In addition, under the loan agreement, DryShips
must maintain (i) minimum liquidity; (ii) a minimum
interest coverage ratio; (iii) a minimum market adjusted
equity ratio; and (iv) a minimum market value adjusted net
worth.
$325.0 million
short-term loan facility
Ocean Rigs $325.0 million short-term loan facility
was guaranteed by DryShips. Under the loan agreement, DryShips
was required to meet certain financial covenants measured on the
DryShips financial accounts requiring the maintenance of
(i) minimum market adjusted equity ratio; (ii) minimum
market value adjusted net worth of DryShips and its
subsidiaries; and (iii) minimum amount of free cash and
cash equivalents. Ocean Rig repaid this facility in April 2011.
Ocean
Rig Global Services Agreement
On December 1, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into a Global Services Agreement with Cardiff,
a company controlled by Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Economou, effective
December 21, 2010, pursuant to which DryShips has engaged
Cardiff to act as consultant on matters of chartering and sale
and purchase transactions for the offshore drilling units
operated by us. Under the Global Services Agreement, Cardiff, or
its subcontractor, will (i) provide consulting services
related to identifying, sourcing, negotiating and arranging new
employment for offshore assets of DryShips and its subsidiaries,
including Ocean Rigs drilling units; and
(ii) identify, source, negotiate and arrange the sale or
purchase of the offshore assets of DryShips and its
subsidiaries, including Ocean Rigs drilling units. In
consideration of such services, DryShips will pay Cardiff a fee
of 1.0% in connection with employment arrangements and 0.75% in
connection with sale and purchase activities. Ocean Rig does not
pay or reimburse DryShips or its affiliates for services
provided in accordance with the Global Services Agreement. Ocean
Rig will, however, record expenses incurred under the Global
Services Agreement in Ocean Rigs income statement and as a
shareholders contribution (additional paid-in capital) to
capital when they are incurred.
The Global Services Agreement does not apply to the agreement
with Petrobras Oil & Gas regarding the early
termination of the Petrobras contract for the Leiv Eiriksson
and the employment of the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
contracts with Cairn and Borders & Southern for the
Leiv Eiriksson. Except as otherwise described, the Global
Services Agreement applies to all contracts entered into after
December 21, 2010 as well as the contract with Cairn for
the Ocean Rig Corcovado and the contract with Vanco for
the Ocean Rig Olympia.
Ocean
Rig Consultancy Agreement
As of September 1, 2010, DryShips, Ocean Rigs parent
company, entered into an agreement with Vivid Finance, a company
controlled by Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Economou, whereby Vivid Finance has
been engaged by DryShips to act as a consultant on financing
matters for DryShips and its affiliates, subsidiaries or holding
companies, including Ocean Rig, as directed by DryShips. Under
this agreement, Vivid Finance provides consulting services
relating to (i) the identification, sourcing, negotiation
and arrangement of new loan and credit facilities, interest swap
agreements, foreign currency contracts and forward exchange
contracts; (ii) the raising of equity or debt in the public
capital markets; and (iii) the renegotiation of existing
loan facilities and other debt instruments. In consideration for
these services, Vivid Finance is entitled to a fee of twenty
basis points, or 0.20%, on the total transaction amount. Ocean
Rig does not pay or reimburse DryShips or its affiliates for
services provided in accordance with this agreement. Ocean Rig
will, however, record expenses incurred under this agreement in
its income statement and as a shareholders contribution
(additional paid-in
179
capital) to capital when they are incurred. During 2011 to the
date of this proxy statement / prospectus, Ocean Rig
expects to record expenses of a total of approximately
$5.2 million in fees from Vivid Finance with respect to
Ocean Rigs financing arrangements, including its issuance
of $500.0 million of its 9.5% senior unsecured notes,
the entry into its $800.0 senior secured term loan agreement,
the restructuring of its Deutsche Bank credit facilities and the
$325.0 million short-term loan facility.
Ocean
Rig Employment Agreements
See Ocean Rig Management Ocean Rig Employment
Agreements.
OCEAN RIG
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial owners of more than five percent of shares of Ocean
Rig common stock and of Ocean Rigs officers and directors
as a group as of the date of this proxy
statement / prospectus. All of Ocean Rigs
shareholders, including the shareholders listed in this table,
are entitled to one vote for each common share held.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the
SECs rules. In computing percentage ownership of each
person, common shares subject to options held by that person
that are currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or
convertible within 60 days of the date of this proxy
statement / prospectus, are deemed to be beneficially
owned by that person. These shares, however, are not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
of Class
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Beneficially
|
Identity of Person or Group
|
|
Owned
|
|
Owned
|
|
DryShips Inc.
|
|
|
98,587,878
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
George Economou(1)
|
|
|
2,869,428
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
Other directors and principal officers as a group
|
|
|
34,400
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% of Ocean Rigs issued and outstanding common
shares. |
|
(1) |
|
George Economou, Ocean Rigs Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer may be deemed to beneficially own these shares
through Sphinx Investment Corp., a Marshall Islands corporation
controlled by Mr. Economou. |
OCEAN RIG
DIVIDEND POLICY
Ocean Rigs long-term objective is to pay a regular
dividend in support of its main objective to maximize
shareholder returns. However, Ocean Rig has not paid any
dividends in the past and Ocean Rig is currently focused on the
development of capital intensive projects in line with its
growth strategy and this focus will limit any dividend payment
in the medium term. Furthermore, since Ocean Rig is a holding
company with no material assets other than the shares of its
subsidiaries through which Ocean Rig conducts its operations,
Ocean Rigs ability to pay dividends will depend on its
subsidiaries distributing their earnings and cash flow to Ocean
Rig. Some of Ocean Rigs other loan agreements limit or
prohibit its subsidiaries ability to make distributions
without the consent of its lenders.
Any future dividends declared will be at the discretion of Ocean
Rigs board of directors and will depend upon Ocean
Rigs financial condition, earnings and other factors,
including the financial covenants contained in its loan
agreements and its 9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016.
Ocean Rigs ability to pay dividends is also subject to
Marshall Islands law, which generally prohibits the payment of
dividends other than from operating surplus or while a company
is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent upon the payment of
such dividend. In addition, under its $800.0 million senior
secured term loan agreement, which matures in 2016, Ocean Rig is
prohibited from paying dividends without the consent of its
lenders.
180
DESCRIPTION
OF OCEAN RIGS CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a description of the material terms of Ocean
Rigs second amended and restated articles of incorporation
and Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws, which
are filed as exhibits to the registration statement on
Form F-4,
of which this proxy statement / prospectus forms a
part.
Purpose
Ocean Rigs purpose, as stated in its second amended and
restated articles of incorporation, is to engage in any lawful
act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be
organized under the Business Corporations Act of the Marshall
Islands, or the MIBCA. Ocean Rigs second amended and
restated articles of incorporation and its second amended and
restated bylaws do not impose any limitations on the ownership
rights of Ocean Rigs shareholders.
Authorized
Capitalization
Under Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation, its authorized capital stock consists of
1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and 500,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share.
As of the date of this proxy statement / prospectus,
131,696,928 common shares were issued and outstanding. All of
Ocean Rigs shares of common stock are in registered form.
Share
History
On December 24, 2007, Ocean Rig issued 500 shares of
its capital stock, par value $20.00 per share, to DryShips,
constituting all of the shares of its authorized capital stock.
On May 15, 2009, Ocean Rig closed a transaction to acquire
the equity interests of the newbuilding vessel-owning companies
of the Ocean Rig Corcovado and Ocean Rig Olympia,
which were owned by clients of Cardiff, including certain
entities affiliated with Mr. Economou. As consideration for
the acquisition of the newbuilding vessel-owning companies of
the Ocean Rig Corcovado and Ocean Rig Olympia,
Ocean Rig issued to the sellers, including entities related to
Mr. Economou, a number of shares equal to 25% of its issued
and outstanding capital stock as of May 15, 2009.
On July 15, 2009, DryShips acquired the remaining 25% of
Ocean Rigs issued and outstanding capital stock from the
minority interests held by certain unrelated entities and
certain parties related to Mr. Economou. Following such
acquisition, Ocean Rig became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
DryShips.
On December 7, 2010, following the approval by its board of
directors and sole shareholder, Ocean Rig amended and restated
its articles of incorporation, among other things, to increase
its authorized share capital to 250,000,000 common shares and to
change the par value to $0.01 per share.
On December 21, 2010, Ocean Rig completed the sale of an
aggregate of 28,571,428 shares of its common stock in a
offering made to
non-U.S. persons
in Norway in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities
Act and to qualified institutional buyers in the U.S. in
reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act, which
included the sale of 1,871,428 common shares pursuant to Ocean
Rigs managers exercise of their option to purchase
additional shares. Concurrently with such offering, Ocean Rig
paid a stock dividend to DryShips of 103,125,500 common shares.
Following this transaction, DryShips owned approximately 78% of
Ocean Rigs outstanding common shares. As of the date of
this proxy statement / prospectus, DryShips owns
approximately 75% of Ocean Rigs outstanding common stock.
On May 3, 2011, following the approval by Ocean Rigs
board of directors and shareholders, Ocean Rig amended and
restated its amended and restated articles of incorporation,
among other things, to increase its authorized share capital to
1,000,000,000 shares of common stock and
500,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each with a par
value of $0.01 per share.
181
Description
of Ocean Rig Common Stock
Under Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation and its second amended and restated bylaws, each
outstanding share of Ocean Rig common stock entitles the holder
to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders.
Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding
shares of preferred stock, holders of shares of Ocean Rigs
common stock will be entitled to receive ratably all dividends,
if any, declared by the Ocean Rig board of directors out of
funds legally available for dividends. Holders of Ocean
Rigs common shares do not have conversion, redemption or
pre-emptive rights to subscribe to any of its securities. The
rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Ocean
Rigs common shares will be subject to the rights of the
holders of any shares of preferred stock, which Ocean Rig may
issue in the future.
Description
of Ocean Rig Preferred Stock
Under its second amended and restated articles of incorporation,
Ocean Rig is authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Ocean Rigs
second amended and restated articles of incorporation authorizes
its board of directors to establish one or more series of
preferred stock and to determine, with respect to any series of
preferred stock, the terms and rights of that series, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation of the series;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of the series;
|
|
|
|
the preferences and relative, participating, option or other
special rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or
restrictions of such series; and
|
|
|
|
the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series.
|
Ocean Rig has designated 8,000,000 shares of its preferred
stock as Series A Participating Preferred Stock in
connection with the adoption of its Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement described under
Ocean Rigs Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement.
Directors
of Ocean Rig
Ocean Rigs directors are elected by a plurality of the
votes cast by Ocean Rig shareholders entitled to vote in an
election. There is no provision for cumulative voting. Ocean
Rigs second amended and restated articles of incorporation
provide that Ocean Rigs board of directors must consist of
at least one member, with the exact number to be fixed by a vote
of at least two-thirds of the entire board of directors. Ocean
Rig directors are elected annually on a staggered basis, whereby
each director will be divided into one of three classes,
Class A, Class B and Class C, which shall be as
nearly equal in number as possible. Each director shall serve
for a three-year term and until his successor shall have been
duly elected and qualified. See Ocean Rig
Classified Board of Directors. Ocean Rigs board of
directors has the authority to fix the amounts which shall be
payable to the members of its board of directors for attendance
at any meeting or for services rendered to Ocean Rig.
Ocean Rig
Shareholder Meetings
Under Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws,
annual shareholder meetings are held at a time and place
selected by its board of directors. The meetings may be held in
or outside of the Marshall Islands. Ocean Rigs board of
directors may set a record date between 15 and 60 days
before the date of any meeting to determine the Ocean Rig
shareholders that will be eligible to receive notice and vote at
the meeting. One or more Ocean Rig shareholders representing at
least one-third of the total voting rights of the total issued
and outstanding shares present in person or by proxy at a
shareholder meeting shall constitute a quorum for the purposes
of the meeting.
Dissenters
Rights of Appraisal and Payment under the MIBCA
Under the MIBCA, Ocean Rigs shareholders have the right to
dissent from various corporate actions, including any merger or
consolidation and the sale of all or substantially all of Ocean
Rigs assets not made in the usual course of its business,
and receive payment of the fair value of their shares. However,
the right of a dissenting shareholder under the MIBCA to receive
payment of the appraised fair value of his shares is not
available for the
182
shares of any class or series of stock, which shares or
depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed
to determine the shareholders entitled to receive notice of and
to vote at the meeting of shareholders to act upon the agreement
of merger or consolidation, were either (i) listed on a
securities exchange or admitted for trading on an interdealer
quotation system or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000
holders. In the event of any amendment of Ocean Rigs
second amended and restated articles of incorporation, an Ocean
Rig shareholder also has the right to dissent and receive
payment for his shares if the amendment alters certain rights in
respect of those shares. The dissenting Ocean Rig shareholder
must follow the procedures set forth in the MIBCA to receive
payment. In the event that Ocean Rig and any dissenting Ocean
Rig shareholder fail to agree on a price for the shares, the
MIBCA procedures involve, among other things, the institution of
proceedings in the high court of the Marshall Islands or in any
appropriate court in any jurisdiction in which Ocean Rig shares
are primarily traded on a local or national securities exchange.
Shareholders
Derivative Actions under the MIBCA
Under the MIBCA, any of Ocean Rigs shareholders may bring
an action in Ocean Rigs name to procure a judgment in
Ocean Rigs favor, also known as a derivative action,
provided that the shareholder bringing the action is a holder of
Ocean Rig common shares both at the time the derivative action
is commenced and at the time of the transaction to which the
action relates.
Limitations
on Liability and Indemnification of Ocean Rig Directors and
Officers
The MIBCA authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the
personal liability of directors and officers to corporations and
their shareholders for monetary damages for breaches of
directors and officers fiduciary duties. Ocean
Rigs second amended and restated articles of incorporation
provide that no director or officer shall be personally liable
to Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs shareholders for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director or officer except to the extent
such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not
permitted under the MIBCA as the same may exist or be amended.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws include a
provision that entitles any of its directors or officers to be
indemnified by Ocean Rig upon the same terms, under the same
conditions and to the same extent as authorized by the MIBCA if
he acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be
in and not opposed to Ocean Rigs best interests, and with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws also
authorize Ocean Rig to carry directors and officers
insurance as a protection against any liability asserted against
its directors and officers acting in their capacity as directors
and officers regardless of whether Ocean Rig would have the
power to indemnify such director or officer against such
liability by law or under the provisions of its second amended
and restated bylaws. Ocean Rig believes that these
indemnification provisions and insurance will be useful to
attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.
The indemnification provisions included in Ocean Rigs
second amended and restated bylaws may discourage shareholders
from bringing a lawsuit against its directors for breach of
fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of
reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against
directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit Ocean Rig and its
shareholders.
As of September 30, 2011, there was no pending material
litigation or proceeding involving any of Ocean Rigs
directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is
sought.
Anti-takeover
Effect of Certain Provisions of Ocean Rigs Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws
Several provisions of Ocean Rigs second amended and
restated articles of incorporation and second amended and
restated bylaws may have anti-takeover effects. These provisions
will be intended to avoid costly takeover battles, lessen Ocean
Rigs vulnerability to a hostile change of control and
enhance the ability of Ocean Rigs board of directors to
maximize shareholder value in connection with any unsolicited
offer to acquire Ocean Rig. However, these anti-takeover
provisions, which are summarized below, could also discourage,
delay or prevent (1) the merger
183
or acquisition of Ocean Rig by means of a tender offer, a proxy
contest or otherwise that a shareholder may consider in its best
interest and (2) the removal of incumbent officers and
directors.
Ocean Rig
Blank Check Preferred Stock
Under the terms of Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
articles of incorporation, its board of directors will have the
authority, without any further vote or action by its
shareholders, to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of blank
check preferred stock. Ocean Rigs board of directors will
be entitled to issue shares of preferred stock on terms
calculated to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control
of Ocean Rig or the removal of its management.
Ocean Rig
Classified Board of Directors
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide that its board of directors serve
staggered, three-year terms. Approximately one-third of Ocean
Rigs board of directors will be elected each year. The
classified board provision could discourage a third party from
making a tender offer for Ocean Rigs shares or attempting
to obtain control of Ocean Rig. It could also delay shareholders
who do not agree with the policies of Ocean Rigs board of
directors from removing a majority of its board of directors for
two years.
Election
and Removal of Ocean Rig Directors
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation prohibit cumulative voting in the election of
directors and Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
bylaws require Ocean Rig shareholders to give advance written
notice of nominations for the election and removal of directors.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation also provide that Ocean Rigs directors may
be removed only for cause upon the affirmative vote of not less
than two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the capital stock
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. These
provisions may discourage, delay or prevent the removal of
incumbent Ocean Rig officers and directors.
Limited
Actions by Ocean Rig Shareholders
Under the MIBCA, Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
articles of incorporation and second amended and restated
bylaws, any action required or permitted to be taken by Ocean
Rigs shareholders must be effected at an annual or special
meeting of shareholders or by the unanimous written consent of
Ocean Rigs shareholders. Ocean Rigs second amended
and restated bylaws provide that, unless otherwise prescribed by
law, only a majority of Ocean Rigs board of directors, the
Chairman of Ocean Rigs board of directors or Ocean
Rigs executive officers who are also directors may call
special meetings of Ocean Rigs shareholders, and the
business transacted at the special meeting is limited to the
purposes stated in the notice. Accordingly, an Ocean Rig
shareholder may be prevented from calling a special meeting for
shareholder consideration of a proposal over the opposition of
Ocean Rigs board of directors, and shareholder
consideration of a proposal may be delayed until the next annual
meeting.
Advance
Notice Requirements for Ocean Rig Shareholder Proposals and
Director Nominations
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws provide that
shareholders seeking to nominate candidates for election as
directors or to bring business before an annual meeting of
shareholders must provide timely notice of their proposal in
writing to Ocean Rigs corporate secretary. Generally, to
be timely, a shareholders notice must be received at Ocean
Rigs principal executive offices not less than
150 days nor more than 180 days prior to the one year
anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting of
shareholders. Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
bylaws also specify requirements as to the form and content of a
shareholders notice. These provisions may impede the
ability of Ocean Rig shareholders to bring matters before an
annual meeting of shareholders or make nominations for directors
at an annual meeting of shareholders.
Ocean
Rigs Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights
Agreement
Ocean Rig has entered into an Amended and Restated Stockholders
Rights Agreement with American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent. Under this agreement,
Ocean Rig declared a dividend payable to shareholders of record
on May 23, 2011 of one preferred share purchase right, or
right, to purchase one one-
184
thousandth of a share of Series A Participating Preferred
Stock for each outstanding share of its common stock, par value
$0.01 per share. The right will separate from the common stock
and become exercisable after (1) a person or group, other
than DryShips, acquires ownership of 15% or more of Ocean
Rigs common stock or (2) the 10th business day
(or such later date as determined by Ocean Rigs board of
directors) after a person or group, other than DryShips,
announces a tender or exchange offer which would result in that
person or group holding 15% or more of the Ocean Rigs
common stock. On the distribution date, each holder of a right
will be entitled to purchase for $100.00 a fraction (1/1000th)
of one share of Series A Participating Preferred Stock which has
similar economic terms as one share of common stock.
If an acquiring person, or an Acquiring Person, acquires more
than 15% of Ocean Rigs common stock then each holder of a
right (except that Acquiring Person) will be entitled to buy at
the exercise price, a number of shares of Ocean Rigs
common stock which has a market value of twice the exercise
price. Any time after the date an Acquiring Person obtains more
than 15% of Ocean Rigs common stock and before that
Acquiring Person acquires more than 50% of Ocean Rigs
outstanding common stock, Ocean Rig will be able to exchange
each right owned by all other rights holders, in whole or in
part, for one share of Ocean Rigs common stock. The rights
will expire on the earliest of (1) May 20, 2021 or
(2) the exchange or redemption of the rights as described
above. Ocean Rig is able to redeem the rights at any time prior
to a public announcement that a person has acquired ownership of
15% or more of Ocean Rigs common stock. Ocean Rig will be
able to amend the terms of the rights and the Shareholders
Rights Agreement without the consent of the rights holders at
any time on or prior to the distribution date. After the
distribution date, the terms of the rights and the Amended and
Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement may be amended to make
changes, which do not adversely affect the rights of the rights
holders (other than the Acquiring Person). The rights do not
have any voting rights. The rights have the benefit of certain
customary anti-dilution protections.
Ocean
Rigs Transfer Agent
The U.S. transfer agent for Ocean Rigs common stock
is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.
The registrar and transfer agent for Ocean Rigs common
stock held through the Norwegian VPS is Nordea Bank Norge ASA.
185
COMPARISON
OF SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
As a result of the merger, OceanFreight shareholders will
receive shares of Ocean Rig common stock in exchange for their
shares of OceanFreight common stock. OceanFreight is
incorporated under the laws of the Marshall Islands and subject
to the laws of the Marshall Islands, including the MIBCA, and
Ocean Rig is also incorporated under the laws of the Marshall
Islands and subject to the laws of the Marshall Islands,
including the MIBCA. The rights of OceanFreight shareholders are
governed by the Marshall Islands law and the articles of
incorporation and bylaws of OceanFreight, while the rights of
Ocean Rig shareholders are governed by the Marshall Islands law
and the articles of incorporation and bylaws of Ocean Rig.
Following the merger, the rights of OceanFreight shareholders
who become Ocean Rig shareholders in the merger will be governed
by the laws of the Marshall Islands law, Ocean Rigs
articles of incorporation and Ocean Rigs bylaws, both as
currently in effect and as will be in effect at the completion
of the merger.
The following is a summary comparison of material differences
between the rights of an OceanFreight shareholder and the rights
of an Ocean Rig shareholder. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of Ocean Rigs
articles of incorporation and bylaws, OceanFreights
articles of incorporation and bylaws, both as currently in
effect and as will be in effect at the completion of the merger,
and the full text of the MIBCA.
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock
|
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation authorize the issuance of up to
(i) 333,333,333 shares of OceanFreight Class A
common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
(ii) 10,000,000 shares of OceanFreight Class B
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, or subordinated
shares, and (iii) 5,000,000 shares of OceanFreight
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Following the conversion of all of OceanFreights
subordinated shares on August 15, 2008, OceanFreight now
has only Class A Common Stock, or the OceanFreight common
stock, issued and outstanding.
As of October 7, 2011, OceanFreight had
5,946,180 common shares issued and outstanding.
The OceanFreight common shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol OCNF.
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation authorizes the board of directors to establish one
or more series of preferred stock and to determine, with respect
to any series of preferred stock, the terms and rights of that
series, including (i) the designation of the series;
(ii) the number of shares of the series; (iii) the
preferences and relative, participating, option or other special
rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or
restrictions of such series; and (iv) the voting rights, if
any, of the holders of the series.
|
|
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation authorize the issuance of up to
1,000,000,000 shares of Ocean Rig common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, and up to 500,000,000 shares of Ocean
Rig preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Ocean Rig has designated 8,000,000 shares of Ocean Rig
preferred stock as Series A Participating Preferred Stock in
connection with the adoption of its Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement. See Description of Ocean
Rigs Capital Stock Ocean Rigs Amended
and Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement.
As of September 30, 2011, 131,696,928 shares of Ocean
Rig common stock were issued and outstanding.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation authorizes the board of directors to establish one
or more series of preferred stock and to determine, with respect
to any series of preferred stock, the terms and rights of that
series, including (i) the designation of the series; (ii) the
number of shares of the series; (iii) the preferences and
relative, participating, option or other special rights, if any,
and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such
series; and (iv) the voting rights, if any, of the holders of
the series.
|
|
|
The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Ocean Rig
common shares will be subject to the rights of the holders of
any shares of preferred stock, which Ocean Rig may issue in the
future.
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
Voting Rights
|
OceanFreights bylaws provide that if a quorum is present,
and except as otherwise expressly provided by law, the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of stock
represented at the meeting shall be the act of the shareholders.
Under OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation and its amended and restated bylaws, each
outstanding share of OceanFreight common stock entitles its
holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of
OceanFreight shareholders.
|
|
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws provide that
if a quorum is present, and except as otherwise expressly
provided by law, Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
articles of incorporation or Ocean Rigs second amended and
restated bylaws, the affirmative vote of a majority of votes of
the shares of Ocean Rig stock at the meeting shall be the act of
the Ocean Rig shareholders. Under Ocean Rigs second
amended and restated bylaws, each outstanding share of Ocean Rig
common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters
submitted to a vote of Ocean Rig shareholders.
|
|
Directors
|
OceanFreights directors are elected by a plurality of the
votes cast at a meeting of the OceanFreight shareholders by the
holders of shares entitled to vote in the election. There is no
provision for cumulative voting.
The OceanFreight board of directors may change the number of
directors only by a vote of at least
662/3%
of the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve
until his successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.
OceanFreights board of directors has the authority to fix
the amounts which shall be payable to the members of the
OceanFreight board of directors for attendance at any meeting or
for services rendered to OceanFreight.
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws also provide that
OceanFreights directors may be removed only for cause and
only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66
2/3% of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors.
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide for a board of directors serving
staggered, three-year terms. Approximately one-third of the
OceanFreight board of directors are elected each year.
|
|
Ocean Rigs directors are elected by a plurality of the
votes cast by the Ocean Rig shareholders entitled to vote in an
election. There is no provision for cumulative voting.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide that its board of directors must consist
of at least one member, with the exact number to be fixed by a
vote of at least two-thirds of the entire board of directors.
Each director shall serve for a three-year term and until his
successor shall have been duly elected and qualified. Ocean
Rigs board of directors has the authority to fix the
amounts which shall be payable to the members of Ocean
Rigs board of directors for attendance at any meeting or
for services rendered to Ocean Rig.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide that directors may be removed only for
cause upon the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of
the outstanding shares of the capital stock entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors. These provisions may
discourage, delay or prevent the removal of incumbent officers
and directors.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide that Ocean Rigs board of directors
serve staggered, three-year terms. Approximately one-third of
Ocean Rigs board of directors are elected each year.
|
|
Quorum and action by the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
A majority of the OceanFreight directors at the time in office,
present in person or by proxy or by
|
|
A majority of the Ocean Rig directors at the time in office,
present in person or by proxy or by conference
|
187
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
communication equipment, shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. The vote of the majority of the
directors, present in person, by proxy or by conference
telephone, at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be
the act of the directors.
|
|
telephone, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business. The vote of the majority of the directors, present in
person, by proxy or by conference telephone, at a meeting at
which quorum is present shall be the act of the directors.
|
|
Director and Officer Limitation on Liability and
Indemnification
|
|
|
|
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide that no OceanFreight director or officer
shall be personally liable to Ocean Rig or any of its
shareholders for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or
officer except to the extent such exemption from liability or
limitation thereof is not permitted under the MIBCA as the same
may exist or be amended.
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation include a provision that entitles any of
OceanFreights directors or officers to be indemnified by
OceanFreight to the full extent permitted by the MIBCA if he
acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in
or not opposed to the best interests of OceanFreight, and with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reason to
believe his conduct was unlawful; provided that, with respect to
actions or suits by or in the right of OceanFreight to procure a
judgment in its favor no indemnification shall be made in
respect of any claim as to which such director or officer shall
have been adjudged to be liable to OceanFreight unless and only
to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was
properly brought shall determine that such person is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for any such expenses.
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation authorize OceanFreight to purchase and maintain
directors and officers insurance as a protection
against any liability asserted against OceanFreights
directors and officers acting in their capacity as directors and
officers regardless of whether OceanFreight would have the power
to indemnify such director or officer against such liability
under the provisions of OceanFreights third amended and
restated articles of incorporation.
|
|
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated articles of
incorporation provide that no Ocean Rig director or officer
shall be personally liable to Ocean Rig or any of its
shareholders for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or
officer except to the extent such exemption from liability or
limitation thereof is not permitted under the MIBCA as the same
may exist or be amended.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws include a
provision that entitles any of Ocean Rigs directors or
officers to be indemnified by Ocean Rig upon the same terms,
under the same conditions and to the same extent as authorized
by the MIBCA if he acted in good faith and in a manner
reasonably believed to be in and not opposed to Ocean Rigs
best interests, and with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was
unlawful.
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws also
authorize Ocean Rig to carry directors and officers
insurance as a protection against any liability asserted against
Ocean Rig directors and officers acting in their capacity as
directors and officers regardless of whether Ocean Rig would
have the power to indemnify such director or officer against
such liability by law or under the provisions of its second
amended and restated bylaws.
|
|
Shareholder Meetings
|
|
|
|
Annual Meetings. OceanFreights
amended and restated bylaws provide that annual shareholder
|
|
Annual Meetings. Ocean Rigs
second amended and restated bylaws provide that annual
shareholder
|
188
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
meetings will be held at a time and place selected by
OceanFreights board of directors. The meetings may be held
in or outside of the Marshall Islands. OceanFreights board
of directors may set a record date between 15 and 60 days before
the date of any meeting to determine the shareholders that will
be eligible to receive notice and vote at the meeting.
Special Meetings. OceanFreights
amended and restated bylaws provide that special meetings of its
shareholders may be called for any purpose by the order of the
OceanFreight board of directors, OceanFreights chairman of
the board or OceanFreights president. No other person or
persons are permitted to call a special meeting and no business
may be conducted at the OceanFreight special meeting other than
business brought before the meeting by the OceanFreight board of
directors. Such meetings shall be held at such place and on a
date and at such time as may be designated in the notice thereof
by the officer of OceanFreight designated by the OceanFreight
board of directors to deliver the notice of such meeting. The
business transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to
the purposes stated in the notice.
|
|
meetings will be held at a time and place selected by Ocean
Rigs board of directors. The meetings may be held in or
outside of the Marshall Islands. Ocean Rigs board of
directors may set a record date between 15 and 60 days
before the date of any meeting to determine the shareholders
that will be eligible to receive notice and vote at the
meeting.
Special Meetings. Ocean Rigs
second amended and restated bylaws provide that special meetings
of its shareholders may be called for any purpose at any time by
Ocean Rigs chairman of the board, a majority of the board
of directors, or any Ocean Rig officer who is also a director.
No other person or persons are permitted to call a special
meeting and no business may be conducted at the special meeting
other than business brought before the meeting by the Ocean Rig
board of directors. Such meetings shall be held at such place
and on a date and at such time as may be designated in the
notice thereof by the Ocean Rig officer designated by the board
of directors to deliver the notice of such meeting. The business
transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to the
purposes stated in the notice.
|
|
Quorum of Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, shareholders
representing at least one-third of the total voting rights of
the total issued and outstanding shares of OceanFreight common
stock present in person or by proxy at a shareholder meeting
shall constitute a quorum for the purposes of the meeting.
|
|
Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, shareholders
representing at least one-third of the total voting rights of
the total issued and outstanding shares of Ocean Rig common
stock present in person or by proxy at a shareholder meeting
shall constitute a quorum for the purposes of the meeting.
|
|
Shareholder Proposals and Nominations
|
OceanFreights amended and restated bylaws provide that
shareholders seeking to nominate candidates for election as
directors, to bring business before an annual meeting of
shareholders or proposing to remove a director must provide
timely notice of their proposal in writing to the corporate
secretary. Generally, to be timely a shareholders notice
must be received at OceanFreights principal executive
offices not less than 120 days nor more than 180 days prior to
the one year anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting of shareholders.
|
|
Ocean Rigs second amended and restated bylaws provide that
shareholders seeking to nominate candidates for election as
directors, to bring business before an annual meeting of
shareholders or proposing to remove a director must provide
timely notice of their proposal in writing to the corporate
secretary. Generally, to be timely, a shareholders notice
must be received at Ocean Rigs principal executive offices
not less than 150 days nor more than 180 days prior to
the one year anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting of shareholders.
|
|
Shareholder Action Without a Meeting
|
|
|
|
Any action required to be or permitted to be taken at a meeting
may be taken without a meeting if a consent in
|
|
Any action required to be or permitted to be taken at a meeting,
may be taken without a meeting if a consent in
|
189
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by all of
the shareholders entitled to vote with respect to the subject
matter thereof.
|
|
writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by all of
the shareholders entitled to vote with respect to the subject
matter thereof.
|
|
Amendments of Governing Instruments
|
|
|
|
Amendments of Articles of
Incorporation. Any amendment to
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation that would increase or decrease the aggregate
number of authorized Class A common stock or Class B
common stock, increase or decrease the par value of the
Class A common stock or Class B common stock, or alter
or change the powers, preferences or rights of the Class A
common stock or Class B common stock so as to affect them
adversely, must be approved by the holders of not less than a
majority of the Class A common stock or Class B common
stock, as applicable.
Notwithstanding any other provision in OceanFreights
third amended and restated articles of incorporation or its
amended and restated bylaws (and notwithstanding the fact that
some lesser percentage may be specified by law), the affirmative
vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding shares of OceanFreight common stock entitled
to vote generally in the election of directors shall be required
to amend, alter, change or repeal provisions dealing with
directors, anti-takeover and director and officer
indemnification.
Amendments of Bylaws. The board of
directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the
bylaws by a vote of not less than a majority of the entire board
of directors, unless otherwise provided in the amended and
restated bylaws; provided however, that the board of directors
is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal certain
provisions in the amended and restated bylaws only by a vote of
not less than
662/3%
of the board of directors. Shareholders may not make, alter or
repeal any bylaw. Notwithstanding any other provisions of
OceanFreights third amended and restated articles of
incorporation or its amended and restated bylaws (and
notwithstanding the fact that some lesser percentage may be
specified by law), the affirmative vote of the holders of
662/3%
or more of OceanFreights outstanding shares of common
stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors
shall be required to amend, alter, change or repeal the
provision dealing with amendments to the bylaws.
|
|
Amendments of Articles of
Incorporation. Notwithstanding any other
provision in Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
articles of incorporation or its second amended and restated
bylaws (and notwithstanding the fact that some lesser percentage
may be specified by law), the affirmative vote of the holders of
two- thirds or more of the outstanding shares of Ocean Rig
common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors shall be required to amend, alter, change or repeal
provisions dealing with directors, amendments to Ocean
Rigs bylaws and anti-takeover.
Amendments of Bylaws. The board of
directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the
bylaws by a vote of not less than a majority of the entire board
of directors, unless otherwise provided in the second amended
and restated bylaws.
|
190
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
Preemptive Rights
|
|
|
|
Holders of OceanFreight shares will not have preferential or
preemptive rights to subscribe to any of OceanFreights
shares or securities convertible or exchangeable into such
shares.
|
|
Holders of Ocean Rig common shares do not have conversion,
redemption or pre-emptive rights to subscribe to any of Ocean
Rigs securities.
|
|
Derivative Actions
|
|
|
|
Under the MIBCA, any OceanFreight shareholder may bring an
action in OceanFreights name to procure a judgment in
OceanFreights favor, also known as a derivative action,
provided that the shareholder bringing the action is a holder of
OceanFreight common shares both at the time the derivative
action is commenced and at the time of the transaction to which
the action relates.
|
|
Under the MIBCA, any Ocean Rig shareholder may bring an action
in Ocean Rigs name to procure a judgment in Ocean
Rigs favor, also known as a derivative action, provided
that the shareholder bringing the action is a holder of Ocean
Rig common shares both at the time the derivative action is
commenced and at the time of the transaction to which the action
relates.
|
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions
|
|
|
|
Although the MIBCA does not contain specific provisions
regarding business combinations between corporations
organized under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands and
interested shareholders, OceanFreight has included
these provisions in its third amended and restated articles of
incorporation. OceanFreights third amended and restated
articles of incorporation contain provisions which prohibit it
from engaging in a business combination with an interested
shareholder for a period of three years after the date of the
transaction in which the person became an interested
shareholder, unless (i) prior to the date of the
transaction that resulted in the shareholder becoming an
interested shareholder, OceanFreights board of directors
approved either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder;
(ii) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in
the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder, the
interested shareholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of
OceanFreight outstanding at the time the transaction commenced;
(iii) at or subsequent to the date of the transaction that
resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder,
the business combination is approved by the board of directors
and authorized at an annual or special meeting of shareholders
by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested shareholder; and (iv) the shareholder became an
interested shareholder prior to the consummation of the initial
public offering.
For purposes of these provisions, a business
combination includes mergers, consolidations, exchanges,
asset sales, leases and other transactions resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested shareholder and an
interested
|
|
Although the MIBCA does not contain specific provisions
regarding business combinations between corporations
organized under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands and
interested shareholders, Ocean Rig has included
these provisions in its second amended and restated articles of
incorporation. Ocean Rigs second amended and restated
articles of incorporation contain provisions which prohibit it
from engaging in a business combination with an interested
shareholder for a period of three years after the date of the
transaction in which the person became an interested
shareholder, unless (i) prior to the date of the transaction
that resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested
shareholder, Ocean Rigs board of directors approved either
the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the
shareholder becoming an interested shareholder; (ii) upon
consummation of the transaction that resulted in the shareholder
becoming an interested shareholder, the interested shareholder
owned at least 85% of the voting stock of Ocean Rig outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced; (iii) at or subsequent to
the date of the transaction that resulted in the shareholder
becoming an interested shareholder, the business combination is
approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual
or special meeting of shareholders by the affirmative vote of at
least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not
owned by the interested shareholder; and (iv) the shareholder
became an interested shareholder prior to the consummation of
the initial public offering.
For purposes of these provisions, a business
combination includes mergers, consolidations, exchanges,
asset sales, leases and other transactions resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested shareholder and an
interested
|
191
|
|
|
OceanFreight
|
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
shareholder is any person or entity that beneficially
owns 20% or more of OceanFreights outstanding voting stock
and any person or entity affiliated with or controlling or
controlled by that person or entity, provided, however, that the
term interested shareholder does not include any
person whose ownership of shares in excess of the 20% limitation
is the result of action taken solely by OceanFreight; provided
that such person shall be an interested shareholder if
thereafter such person acquires additional shares of
OceanFreights voting shares, except as a result of further
action by OceanFreight not caused, directly or indirectly, by
such person.
|
|
shareholder is any person or entity that beneficially
owns 15% or more of Ocean Rigs outstanding voting stock
and any person or entity affiliated with or controlling or
controlled by that person or entity, other than DryShips,
provided, however, that the term interested
shareholder does not include any person whose ownership of
shares in excess of the 15% limitation is the result of action
taken solely by Ocean Rig; provided that such person shall be an
interested shareholder if thereafter such person acquires
additional shares of Ocean Rigs voting shares, except as a
result of further action by Ocean Rig not caused, directly or
indirectly, by such person.
|
|
Shareholder Rights Plans
|
|
|
|
OceanFreight has entered into a Third Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement with American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent.
The terms of the Third Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights
Agreement are substantially similar to the terms of
OceanFreights Second Amended and Restated Stockholders
Rights Agreement which is described in OceanFreights
Form 20-F
included as Annex D to this document. The Third Amended and
Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement modified the definition
of the term Acquiring Person in connection
with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and
the purchase agreement.
|
|
Ocean Rig has entered into an Amended and Restated Stockholders
Rights Agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC, as Rights Agent. See Description of Ocean
Rigs Capital Stock Ocean Rigs Amended
and Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement.
|
192
REPUBLIC
OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS COMPANY CONSIDERATIONS
Ocean Rigs corporate affairs are governed by its articles
of incorporation and bylaws, and by the MIBCA. The provisions of
the MIBCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a
number of states in the United States. While the MIBCA also
provides that it is to be interpreted according to the laws of
the State of Delaware and other states with substantially
similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any,
court cases interpreting the MIBCA in the Marshall Islands and
Ocean Rig shareholders cannot predict whether Marshall Islands
courts would reach the same conclusions as courts in the
U.S. Thus, Ocean Rig shareholders may have more difficulty
in protecting their interests in the face of actions by the
management, directors or controlling shareholders than would
shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a
U.S. jurisdiction which has developed a substantial body of
case law. The following table provides a comparison between the
statutory provisions of the MIBCA and the Delaware General
Corporation Law relating to shareholders rights.
|
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
Shareholder Meetings
|
Held at a time and place as designated in the bylaws.
|
|
May be held at such time or place as designated in the
certificate of incorporation or the bylaws, or if not so
designated, as determined by the board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the board
of directors or by such person or persons as may be authorized
by the articles of incorporation or by the bylaws.
|
|
Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the board
of directors or by such person or persons as may be authorized
by the certificate of incorporation or by the bylaws.
|
|
|
|
May be held within or without the Marshall Islands.
|
|
May be held within or without Delaware.
|
|
|
|
Notice:
|
|
Notice:
|
|
|
|
Whenever shareholders are required to take any action at a
meeting, written notice of the meeting shall be given which
shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting and, unless
it is an annual meeting, indicate that it is being issued by or
at the direction of the person calling the meeting.
|
|
Whenever shareholders are required to take any action at a
meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given which
shall state the place, if any, date and hour of the meeting, and
the means of remote communication, if any.
|
A copy of the notice of any meeting shall be given personally or
sent by mail not less than 15 nor more than 60 days before
the meeting.
|
|
Written notice shall be given not less than 10 nor more than
60 days before the meeting.
|
|
Shareholders Voting Rights
|
|
|
|
Any action required to be taken by a meeting of shareholders may
be taken without meeting if consent is in writing and is signed
by all the shareholders entitled to vote.
|
|
Any action required to be taken at a meeting of shareholders may
be taken without a meeting if a consent for such action is in
writing and is signed by shareholders having not fewer than the
minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or
take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to
vote thereon were present and voted.
|
|
|
|
Any person authorized to vote may authorize another person or
persons to act for him by proxy.
|
|
Any person authorized to vote may authorize another person or
persons to act for him by proxy.
|
Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, a
majority of shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. In no
event shall a quorum consist of fewer than one- third of the
shares entitled to vote at a meeting.
|
|
For stock corporations, the certificate of incorporation or
bylaws may specify the number of shares required to constitute a
quorum but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one-
third of shares entitled to vote at a meeting. In the absence of
such specifications, a
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
|
majority of shares entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum.
|
|
|
|
When a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, it is not
broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any shareholders.
|
|
When a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, it is not
broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any shareholders.
|
|
|
|
The articles of incorporation may provide for cumulative voting
in the election of directors.
|
|
The certificate of incorporation may provide for cumulative
voting in the election of directors.
|
|
|
|
Any two or more domestic corporations may merge into a single
corporation if approved by the board and if authorized by a
majority vote of the holders of outstanding shares at a
shareholder meeting.
|
|
Any two or more corporations existing under the laws of the
state may merge into a single corporation pursuant to a board
resolution and upon the majority vote by shareholders of each
constituent corporation at an annual or special meeting.
|
|
|
|
Any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or
substantially all the assets of a corporation, if not made in
the corporations usual or regular course of business, once
approved by the board, shall be authorized by the affirmative
vote of two-thirds of the shares of those entitled to vote at a
shareholder meeting.
|
|
Every corporation may at any meeting of the board sell, lease or
exchange all or substantially all of its property and assets as
its board deems expedient and for the best interests of the
corporation when so authorized by a resolution adopted by the
holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of the
corporation entitled to vote.
|
|
|
|
Any domestic corporation owning at least 90% of the outstanding
shares of each class of another domestic corporation may merge
such other corporation into itself without the authorization of
the shareholders of any corporation.
|
|
Any corporation owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of
each class of another corporation may merge the other
corporation into itself and assume all of its obligations
without the vote or consent of shareholders; however, in case
the parent corporation is not the surviving corporation, the
proposed merger shall be approved by a majority of the
outstanding stock of the parent corporation entitled to vote at
a duly called shareholder meeting.
|
|
|
|
Any mortgage, pledge of or creation of a security interest in
all or any part of the corporate property may be authorized
without the vote or consent of the shareholders, unless
otherwise provided for in the articles of incorporation.
|
|
Any mortgage or pledge of a corporations property and
assets may be authorized without the vote or consent of
shareholders, except to the extent that the certificate of
incorporation otherwise provides.
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
The board of directors must consist of at least one member.
|
|
The board of directors must consist of at least one member.
|
|
|
|
The number of board members may be changed by an amendment to
the bylaws, by the shareholders, or by action of the board under
the specific provisions of a bylaw.
|
|
The number of board members shall be fixed by, or in a manner
provided by, the bylaws, unless the certificate of incorporation
fixes the number of directors, in which case a change in the
number shall be made only by an amendment to the certificate of
incorporation.
|
|
|
|
If the board is authorized to change the number of directors, it
can only do so by a majority of the entire board and so long as
no decrease in the number shall shorten the term of any
incumbent director.
|
|
If the number of directors is fixed by the certificate of
incorporation, a change in the number shall be made only by an
amendment of the certificate.
|
194
|
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Removal:
|
|
Removal:
|
|
|
|
Any or all of the directors may be removed for cause by vote of
the shareholders.
|
|
Any or all of the directors may be removed, with or without
cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to
vote unless the certificate of incorporation otherwise provides.
|
If the articles of incorporation or the bylaws so provide, any
or all of the directors may be removed without cause by vote of
the shareholders.
|
|
In the case of a classified board, shareholders may effect
removal of any or all directors only for cause.
|
|
Dissenters Rights of Appraisal
|
|
|
|
Shareholders have a right to dissent from any plan of merger,
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all assets not
made in the usual course of business, and receive payment of the
fair value of their shares. However, the right of a dissenting
shareholder under the MIBCA to receive payment of the appraised
fair value of his shares is not available for the shares
of any class or series of stock, which shares or depository
receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to
determine the shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the meeting of the shareholders to act upon the
agreement of merger or consolidation, were either
(i) listed on a securities exchange or admitted for trading
on an interdealer quotation system or (ii) held of record
by more than 2,000 holders.
|
|
Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class
or series of stock of a corporation in a merger or
consolidation, subject to limited exceptions, such as a merger
or consolidation of corporations listed on a national securities
exchange in which listed stock is the offered consideration.
|
A holder of any adversely affected shares who does not vote on
or consent in writing to an amendment to the articles of
incorporation has the right to dissent and to receive payment
for such shares if the amendment:
|
|
|
Alters or abolishes any preferential right of any outstanding
shares having preference; or
|
|
|
Creates, alters, or abolishes any provision or right in respect
to the redemption of any outstanding shares; or
|
|
|
Alters or abolishes any preemptive right of such holder to
acquire shares or other securities; or
|
|
|
Excludes or limits the right of such holder to vote on any
matter, except as such right may be limited by the voting rights
given to new shares then being authorized of any existing or new
class.
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Derivative Actions
|
An action may be brought in the right of a corporation to
procure a judgment in its favor, by a holder of shares or of
voting trust certificates or of a beneficial interest in such
shares or certificates. It shall be made to appear that the
plaintiff is such a holder at the time of bringing the action
and that he was such a holder at the time of the transaction of
which he complains, or that his shares or
|
|
In any derivative suit instituted by a shareholder of a
corporation, it shall be averred in the complaint that the
plaintiff was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of
the transaction of which he complains or that such
shareholders stock thereafter devolved upon such
shareholder by operation of law.
|
195
|
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
Delaware
|
|
his interest therein devolved upon him by operation of law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A complaint shall set forth with particularity the efforts of
the plaintiff to secure the initiation of such action by the
board or the reasons for not making such effort.
|
|
Other requirements regarding derivative suits have been created
by judicial decision, including that a shareholder may not bring
a derivative suit unless he or she first demands that the
corporation sue on its own behalf and that demand is refused
(unless it is shown that such demand would have been futile).
|
|
|
|
Such action shall not be discontinued, compromised or settled,
without the approval of the High Court of the Republic of The
Marshall Islands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reasonable expenses including attorneys fees may be
awarded if the action is successful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A corporation may require a plaintiff bringing a derivative suit
to give security for reasonable expenses if the plaintiff owns
less than 5% of any class of stock and the shares have a value
of less than $50,000.
|
|
|
196
TAXATION
Certain
Material Tax Consequences
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. Holder
is a beneficial owner of OceanFreight shares or Ocean Rig
shares, other than an entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership or other type of pass-through entity for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is (i) an
individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States,
(ii) a corporation (or other entity taxable as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created
or organized under the laws of the United States or any state
thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of the source of
that income or (iv) a trust if it (A) is subject to
the primary supervision of a court within the United States and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (B) was in existence
on August 20, 1996 and has properly elected under
applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person. A
Non-U.S. Holder
is a beneficial owner of OceanFreight shares or Ocean Rig shares
that is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership or other
type of pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership
or other type of pass-through entity for U.S. federal
income tax purposes holds OceanFreight shares or Ocean Rig
shares, the tax treatment of a partner or beneficial owner of
such entity or arrangement may depend on the status of the
partner or beneficial owner and the activities of the
partnership or entity. Partners and beneficial owners in such
entities or arrangements holding OceanFreight shares or Ocean
Rig shares are urged to consult their own advisors as to the
particular U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable
to them.
Unless otherwise noted, this discussion is based upon the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code,
applicable United States Treasury Regulations, Internal Revenue
Service rulings and judicial decisions, all as in effect as of
the date hereof. Subsequent developments in the tax laws of the
United States, including changes in or differing interpretations
of the foregoing authorities, which may be applied
retroactively, could have a material effect on the tax
consequences described below. This discussion only applies to
shareholders who hold their OceanFreight and Ocean Rig shares as
a capital asset. This is not a complete description
of all the tax consequences of the merger and may not address
U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to
OceanFreight shareholders subject to special treatment under
U.S. federal income tax law. Shareholders subject to
special treatment include, for example, financial institutions,
dealers in securities, traders in securities who elect to apply
a
mark-to-market
method of accounting, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities,
entities or arrangements treated as partnerships and other
pass-through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes
and holders who hold OceanFreight shares as part of a
hedge, straddle, conversion
or constructive sale transaction.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
The following discussion summarizes certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a
U.S. Holder (defined above) and a
Non-U.S. Holder
(defined above) of OceanFreight shares. This discussion applies
only to OceanFreight shares owned as capital assets within the
meaning of the Code.
OceanFreight did not obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service or an opinion of counsel with respect to the tax
consequences of the merger. This summary is not binding upon the
Internal Revenue Service, and no assurance can be given that the
Internal Revenue Service would not assert, or that a court would
not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax aspects set
forth herein. In addition, this discussion does not address the
tax consequences of these transactions under applicable
U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum tax laws,
or any U.S. state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws.
Each OceanFreight shareholder is urged to consult with its
own tax advisors to determine the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to it of the merger, as well as the effects of
U.S. state, local and
non-U.S. tax
laws.
U.S.
Holder
The merger will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes
as a taxable sale by a U.S. Holder of the OceanFreight
shares that such holder surrenders in the merger. As a result of
the merger,
197
|
|
|
|
|
A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference between (1) the sum of the cash consideration
(including any cash received in lieu of fractional shares) and
the fair market value of the Ocean Rig shares (at the time the
merger is completed) received in the merger and (2) such
holders adjusted tax basis in the OceanFreight shares
surrendered in the merger;
|
|
|
|
A U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the Ocean Rig
shares that such holder receives in the merger will equal the
fair market value of the Ocean Rig shares at the time the merger
is completed; and
|
|
|
|
A U.S. Holders holding period for the Ocean Rig
shares that such holder receives in the merger should generally
begin on the day after the completion of the merger.
|
Because the merger consideration consists of Ocean Rig shares in
addition to cash, a U.S. Holder of OceanFreight shares may
need to sell a portion of the Ocean Rig shares received in the
merger, or raise cash from other sources, to pay any tax
obligations resulting from the merger.
If a U.S. Holder acquired different blocks of OceanFreight
stock at different times and at different prices, any gain or
loss will be determined separately with respect to each such
block of OceanFreight stock surrendered, and the cash and Ocean
Rig shares that such holder receives will be allocated pro rata
to each such block of OceanFreight stock.
Unless OceanFreight is a passive foreign investment company, or
PFIC, any gain or loss that a U.S. Holder recognizes in
connection with the merger will generally be capital gain or
loss. Please read Taxation United States
Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders United
States Federal Income Tax Treatment of Common Shares
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences in
OceanFreights Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2010, included as
Annex D to this proxy statement / prospectus, for
a discussion of OceanFreights view that it was not a PFIC
during the 2010 taxable year and it does not expect to be a PFIC
for any future taxable year. Gain or loss will be long-term
capital gain or loss provided that such shareholders
holding period for such shares is more than 12 months at
the effective time of the merger. If an individual
shareholders holding period for the OceanFreight shares is
one year or less at the effective time of the merger, any gain
will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the same rate as
ordinary income. The deductibility of capital losses is subject
to limitations under the Code.
For corporations, capital gain is taxed at the same rate as
ordinary income, and capital losses in excess of capital gains
are not deductible. Corporations, however, generally may carry
back and carry forward capital losses for certain periods.
A holder of OceanFreight shares may be subject to
backup withholding at a rate of 28% with respect to
the amount of cash received in the merger, unless such holder
provides proof of an applicable exemption or a correct taxpayer
identification number, and otherwise complies with the
requirements of the backup withholding rules. Corporations
and
Non-U.S. Holders
will generally be exempt from backup withholding, but may be
required to provide a certification to establish their
entitlement to the exemption. Backup withholding does not
constitute an additional tax, but is merely an advance payment
that may be refunded or credited against a holders
U.S. federal income tax liability if the required
information is supplied to the Internal Revenue Service in a
timely manner.
Non-U.S.
Holder
Any gain realized on the receipt of Ocean Rig shares and cash in
the merger by a
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or
withholding tax unless: (i) such gain is effectively
connected with the conduct by such
Non-U.S. Holder
of a trade or business in the United States, or (ii) in the
case of any gain realized by an individual
Non-U.S. Holder,
such holder is present in the United States for 183 days or
more in the taxable year in which the merger is completed and
certain other conditions are met.
This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to
be, nor should it be construed to be, tax-advice to any
particular holder of OceanFreight shares. This summary does not
purport to be a complete analysis or discussion of all potential
tax consequences relevant to OceanFreight shareholders. Each
OceanFreight
198
shareholder is urged to consult with its own tax advisors to
determine the U.S. federal income tax consequences to it of
the merger, as well as the effects of U.S. state, local and
non-U.S. tax
laws.
Material
Tax Considerations with Respect to the Ownership and Disposition
of Ocean Rig Common Stock
The following is a discussion of the material Marshall Islands
and U.S. federal income tax considerations relevant to an
investment decision by a U.S. Holder and a Non
U.S. Holder, each as defined above, with respect to the
ownership and disposition of Ocean Rig common stock to be
delivered as part of the merger consideration.
Marshall
Islands Tax Considerations
In the opinion of Seward & Kissel LLP, Ocean
Rigs Marshall Islands counsel, the following are the
material Marshall Islands tax consequences of Ocean Rigs
activities to Ocean Rig and Ocean Rigs shareholders. Ocean
Rig is incorporated in the Marshall Islands. Under current
Marshall Islands law, Ocean Rig is not subject to tax on income
or capital gains, and no Marshall Islands withholding tax will
be imposed upon payments of dividends by Ocean Rig to its
shareholders.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations
In the opinion of Seward & Kissel LLP, Ocean
Rigs U.S. counsel, the following are the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to the
ownership of and disposition by a U.S. Holder of Ocean Rig
common stock received as part of the merger consideration. The
following discussion of U.S. federal income tax matters is
based on the Code, judicial decisions, administrative
pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by
the U.S. Department of the Treasury, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.
Distributions
Subject to the discussion of PFICs below, any distributions made
by Ocean Rig with respect to its common shares to a
U.S. Holder, will generally constitute dividends, to the
extent of Ocean Rigs current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles. Distributions in excess of Ocean Rigs earnings
and profits will be treated first as a nontaxable return of
capital to the extent of the U.S. Holders tax basis
in his Ocean Rig common shares on a
dollar-for-dollar
basis and thereafter as capital gain. Because Ocean Rig is not a
U.S. corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations
will not be entitled to claim a dividends received deduction
with respect to any distributions they receive from Ocean Rig.
Dividends paid with respect to the Ocean Rig common shares will
generally be treated as passive category income or,
in the case of certain types of U.S. Holders, general
category income for purposes of computing allowable
foreign tax credits for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
Until the Ocean Rig common shares are traded on a established
securities market in the United States, Ocean Rig does not
anticipate that any dividends paid on the Ocean Rig common
shares will be treated as qualified dividend income
which is taxable (through December 31, 2012 under current
law) at preferential rates to U.S. Holders who are
individuals, trusts or estates.
Sale,
Exchange or other Disposition of Ocean Rig Common
Shares
Assuming Ocean Rig does not constitute a PFIC for any taxable
year, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain
or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of the Ocean
Rig common shares in an amount equal to the difference between
the amount realized by the U.S. Holder from such sale,
exchange or other disposition and the U.S. Holders
tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be treated as
long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holders
holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale,
exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will
generally be treated as U.S. source income or loss, as
applicable, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. A
U.S. Holders ability to deduct capital losses is
subject to certain limitations.
199
Passive
Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax
Consequences
Special U.S. federal income tax rules apply to a
U.S. Holder that holds stock in a foreign corporation
classified as a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In general, a foreign corporation will be treated as a PFIC with
respect to a U.S. shareholder in such foreign corporation,
if, for any taxable year in which such shareholder holds stock
in such foreign corporation, either:
|
|
|
|
|
at least 75% of the corporations gross income for such
taxable year consists of passive income (e.g., dividends,
interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the
active conduct of a rental business); or
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the average value of the assets held by the
corporation during such taxable year produce, or are held for
the production of, passive income.
|
For purposes of determining whether a foreign corporation is a
PFIC, it will be treated as earning and owning its proportionate
share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of its
subsidiary corporations in which it owns at least 25% of the
value of the subsidiarys stock. If Ocean Rig is treated as
a PFIC, then a U.S. person would be treated as indirectly
owning shares of its foreign corporate subsidiaries for purposes
of the PFIC rules.
Income earned by a foreign corporation in connection with the
performance of services would not constitute passive income. By
contrast, rental income would generally constitute passive
income unless the foreign corporation is treated under
specific rules as deriving its rental income in the active
conduct of a trade or business.
Ocean Rig does not believe that it is currently a PFIC, although
it may have been a PFIC for certain prior taxable years. Based
on Ocean Rigs current operations and future projections,
Ocean Rig does not believe that it has been, is, or will be a
PFIC with respect to any taxable year beginning with the 2009
taxable year. Although Ocean Rig intends to conduct its affairs
in the future in a manner to avoid being classified as a PFIC,
Ocean Rig cannot assure you that the nature of its operations
will not change in the future.
Special U.S. federal income tax elections have been made or
will be made in respect of certain of Ocean Rigs
subsidiaries. The effect of these special U.S. tax
elections is to ignore or disregard the subsidiaries for which
elections have been made as separate taxable entities and to
treat them as part of their sole shareholder. Therefore, for
purposes of the following discussion, for each subsidiary for
which such an election has been made, the shareholder of such
subsidiary, and not the subsidiary itself, will be treated as
the owner of the subsidiarys assets and as receiving the
subsidiarys income.
As discussed more fully below, if Ocean Rig were to be treated
as a PFIC for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be
subject to different taxation rules depending on whether the
U.S. Holder makes an election to treat Ocean Rig as a
Qualified Electing Fund, which election Ocean Rig
refers to as a QEF election. In addition, if Ocean
Rig were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year after
2010, a U.S. Holder would be required to file an annual
report with the Internal Revenue Service for that year with
respect to such holders Ocean Rig common shares.
A U.S. Holder who owns shares in a PFIC is permitted to
make a
mark-to-market
election with respect to such stock if the stock is treated as
marketable stock. Ocean Rig does not anticipate that
its stock will be treated as marketable stock for
purposes of the PFIC rules and the remainder of this discussion
assumes that a U.S. Holder of Ocean Rig common shares will
not be able to make a
mark-to-market
election.
Taxation
of U.S. Holders Making a Timely QEF Election
If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election, which
U.S. Holder is referred to as an Electing
Holder, the Electing Holder must report each year for
U.S. federal income tax purposes his pro rata share of
Ocean Rigs ordinary earnings and net capital gain, if any,
for Ocean Rigs taxable year that ends with or within the
taxable year of the Electing Holder, regardless of whether or
not distributions were received from Ocean Rig by the Electing
Holder. The Electing Holders adjusted tax basis in his
Ocean Rig common shares will be increased to reflect taxed but
undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings
and profits that had been previously taxed will result in a
corresponding reduction in the adjusted tax basis in his Ocean
Rig common shares and will not be taxed again once distributed.
An Electing Holder would generally recognize capital gain or
loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of Ocean Rig
common shares. A U.S. Holder would make a QEF election with
respect to any year that Ocean Rig is a PFIC by filing Internal
Revenue Service Form 8621 with his U.S. federal income
tax return. If
200
Ocean Rig was aware that it was to be treated as a PFIC for any
taxable year, Ocean Rig would, if possible, provide each
U.S. Holder with all necessary information in order to make
the QEF election described above. It should be noted that Ocean
Rig may not be able to provide such information if it did not
become aware of its status as a PFIC in a timely manner.
Taxation
of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF Election
Finally, if Ocean Rig was to be treated as a PFIC for any
taxable year, a U.S. Holder who does not make a QEF
election for that year, whom Ocean Rig refers to as a
Non-Electing Holder, would be subject to special
rules with respect to (1) any excess distribution (i.e.,
the portion of any distributions received by the Non-Electing
Holder on the Ocean Rig common shares in a taxable year in
excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by
the Non-Electing Holder in the three preceding taxable years,
or, if shorter, the Non-Electing Holders holding period
for the Ocean Rig common shares) and (2) any gain realized
on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Ocean Rig
common shares. Under these special rules:
|
|
|
|
|
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over
the Non-Electing Holders aggregate holding period for his
Ocean Rig common shares;
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable
year before Ocean Rig became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary
income; and
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be
subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the
applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest
charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with
respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other
taxable year.
|
These penalties would not apply to a pension or profit sharing
trust or other tax-exempt organization that did not borrow funds
or otherwise utilize leverage in connection with its acquisition
of Ocean Rig common shares. If a Non-Electing Holder who is an
individual dies while owning Ocean Rig common shares, such
holders successor generally would not receive a
step-up in
tax basis with respect to such stock.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, dividend payments, or other taxable distributions,
made within the United States to a U.S. Holder will be subject
to information reporting requirements. Such payments will also
be subject to backup withholding tax if paid to a non-corporate
U.S. Holder who:
|
|
|
|
|
fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number;
|
|
|
|
is notified by the Internal Revenue Service that he has failed
to report all interest or dividends required to be shown on his
federal income tax returns; or
|
|
|
|
in certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable
certification requirements.
|
Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Rather, a
taxpayer generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld
under backup withholding rules that exceed the taxpayers
income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the Internal
Revenue Service.
Other Tax
Considerations
In addition to the tax consequences discussed above, Ocean Rig
may be subject to tax in one or more other jurisdictions where
Ocean Rig conducts activities. The amount of any such tax
imposed upon Ocean Rigs operations may be material.
ENFORCEABILITY
OF OCEAN RIG CIVIL LIABILITIES
Ocean Rig is a Marshall Islands company and Ocean Rigs
principal administrative offices are located outside the United
States in Nicosia, Cyprus. A majority of Ocean Rigs
directors, officers and the experts named in this proxy
statement / prospectus reside outside the United
States. In addition, a substantial portion of Ocean Rigs
assets
201
and the assets of Ocean Rigs subsidiaries, directors,
officers and experts are located outside of the United States.
As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for
U.S. investors to serve process within the United States
upon Ocean Rig or any of these persons. U.S. investors may also
have difficulty enforcing, both in and outside the United
States, judgments they may obtain in United States courts
against Ocean Rig or these persons in any action, including
actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S.
federal or state securities laws.
Furthermore, there is substantial doubt that courts in the
countries in which Ocean Rig or its subsidiaries are
incorporated or where Ocean Rigs assets or the assets of
its subsidiaries, directors or officers and such experts are
located (i) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts
obtained in actions against Ocean Rig or its subsidiaries,
directors or officers and such experts based upon the civil
liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state
securities laws or (ii) would enforce, in original actions,
liabilities against Ocean Rig or its subsidiaries, directors or
officers and such experts based on those laws.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of Ocean Rig common stock offered
hereby and other matters relating to Marshall Islands and U.S.
law will be passed upon for Ocean Rig by Seward &
Kissel LLP, One Battery Park Plaza, New York, New York 10004.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of OceanFreight as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, appearing in
OceanFreights
Form 20-F
included as Annex D to this proxy
statement / prospectus have been audited by
Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants
S.A., independent registered public accounting firm, as set
forth in their report thereon, appearing elsewhere herein, and
are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority
of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig UDW at
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, appearing in this proxy
statement / prospectus have been audited by
Ernst & Young AS, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon, appearing
elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report
given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig ASA at
May 14, 2008, and for the period from January 1, 2008
to May 14, 2008, appearing in this proxy
statement / prospectus have been audited by
Ernst & Young AS, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing
elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report
given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The sections in this proxy statement / prospectus
entitled Ocean Rig Summary, Risk
Factors, Ocean Rig Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Ocean Rigs Financial Condition and Results of
Operation and Business have been reviewed by
Fearnley Offshore AS and the section entitled The Offshore
Drilling Industry has been supplied by Fearnley Offshore
AS, which has confirmed to Ocean Rig that such sections
accurately describe, to the best of its knowledge, the offshore
drilling industry.
INFORMATION
PROVIDED BY OCEAN RIG
Ocean Rig will furnish holders of Ocean Rigs common shares
with annual reports containing audited financial statements and
a report by Ocean Rigs independent registered public
accounting firm. The audited financial statements will be
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As a foreign
private issuer, Ocean Rig is exempt from the rules under
the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy
statements to shareholders. While Ocean Rig furnishes proxy
statements to shareholders in accordance with the rules of any
stock exchange on which Ocean Rigs common shares may be
listed in the future, those proxy statements will not conform to
Schedule 14A of the proxy rules promulgated under the
Exchange Act. In addition, as a foreign private
issuer, Ocean Rigs officers and directors are exempt
from the rules under the Exchange Act relating to short swing
profit reporting and liability.
202
OCEAN RIG
ASA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Ocean Rig ASA (the Company) as of May 14, 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows for the period
January 1, 2008 through May 14, 2008. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Ocean Rig ASA at May 14, 2008, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows
for the period January 1, 2008 through May 14, 2008,
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Ernst & Young AS
Stavanger, Norway
February 3, 2011
F-2
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except for
share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 4)
|
|
|
31,110
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
40,188
|
|
Due from related parties (Note 3)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 7)
|
|
|
923
|
|
Deferred operating expenses
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
Prepayments and advances
|
|
|
18,670
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
96,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS, NET:
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs, machinery and equipment, net (Note 5)
|
|
|
1,132,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets, net
|
|
|
1,132,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,229,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 6)
|
|
|
490,198
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
9,399
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
27,528
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 7)
|
|
|
621
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
538,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 6)
|
|
|
281,307
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability (Note 8)
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
283,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,374,980 shares
authorized at December 31, 2007 and May 14,
2008;170,374,980 shares issued and 162,171,380 outstanding
at December 31, 2007 and May 14, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
132,109
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
618,131
|
|
Treasury stock, 8,203,600 common shares, at par value, at
December 31, 2007 and May 14, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(6,361
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
105,447
|
|
(Accumulated deficit)/Retained earnings
|
|
|
(442,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
406,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,229,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing revenues
|
|
$
|
60,078
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
39,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses exclusive of items shown
separately below (Note 9)
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 5)
|
|
|
19,367
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
19,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME / (EXPENSES):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs (Note 10)
|
|
|
(41,661
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
381
|
|
Other, net (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses, net
|
|
|
(41,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(21,759
|
)
|
Income taxes (Note 13)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED
(Note 12)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES, BASIC AND DILUTED
|
|
|
162,171,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
# of Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,374,980
|
|
|
|
132,109
|
|
|
|
615,453
|
|
|
|
(6,361
|
)
|
|
|
107,735
|
|
|
|
(419,048
|
)
|
|
|
429,888
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
Option program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in defined benefit plan
adjustment, net of tax of $0 (Note 13)
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
Interest swap loss , net of tax of $0 (Note 13)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
25,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,374,980
|
|
|
|
132,109
|
|
|
|
618,131
|
|
|
|
(6,361
|
)
|
|
|
105,447
|
|
|
|
(442,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
406,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1 -
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19,367
|
|
Amortization, write off of financing costs and premium paid over
withdrawn loans
|
|
|
22,680
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation costs related to share option program
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
Difference between pension cost and pension paid
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Net unrealized foreign currency exchange gain / loss
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivable
|
|
|
(27,413
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,429
|
|
Due from related parties
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(4,271
|
)
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
546
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(918
|
)
|
Other prepaid/ Pension liability
|
|
|
611
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(19,228
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
(9,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by/(Used in) Operating Activities
|
|
|
(29,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs, equipment and other improvements
|
|
|
(10,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(10,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term credit facility
|
|
|
193,500
|
|
Payments of short-term credit facility
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
Principal payments and repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(167,920
|
)
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(7,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used in) /Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(31,002
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange difference
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year/period for:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of amount capitalized
|
|
|
(22,628
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
OCEAN RIG
ASA
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
1.
|
Basis of
Presentation and General Information:
|
Ocean Rig ASA, a Norwegian registered entity incorporated on
September 26, 1996, was a public limited company whose
shares were traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange from 1997 until
July 21, 2008. On December 20, 2007, Primelead
Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of DryShips, a company listed
on NASDAQ, acquired 30.4% of the issued shares of Ocean Rig ASA.
On May 14, 2008, Primelead Ltd. obtained control of Ocean
Rig and Ocean Rig ASA became a consolidated subsidiary of
DryShips Inc. Effective July 10, 2008, Primelead Ltd. owned
100% of the shares in Ocean Rig ASA. Subsequently, the
operations of Ocean Rig ASA have been internally reorganized and
in some cases re-domiciled as part of the DryShips Inc. group.
As a result, Ocean Rig ASA filed for liquidation in January 2009
and distributed of all significant assets to Primelead Ltd., as
a liquidation dividend, including the shares in all its
subsidiaries on December 15, 2009. In 2009, it was also
resolved to liquidate several other subsidiaries as a part of a
restructuring of the DryShips Inc. group.
Ocean Rig ASA has its origins from 1996, when Ocean Rig ASA
ordered four hulls. The 5th generation drilling rigs
Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude were delivered in
2001 and 2002, while two remaining hulls were sold. Ocean Rig
UDW owns and operates two semi-submersible offshore drilling
rigs that are among the worlds largest drilling rigs, built for
ultra deep-waters and extreme weather conditions.
Basis
of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig ASA comprise
the financial statements of Ocean Rig ASA and its subsidiaries
(the Company or the Group) as of the
balance sheet date. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the
date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains
control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that
such control ceases. The financial statements of the
subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting year as the
parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting policies:
|
(a) Principles
of Consolidation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America (US GAAP)
and include the accounts and operating results of Ocean Rig ASA
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
(b) Use
of Estimates:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Current
and non-current
classification:
Receivables and liabilities are classified as current assets and
current liabilities, respectively, if their maturity is within
one year of the balance sheet date. Otherwise, they are
classified as non-current assets and non-current liabilities.
F-7
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
(d) Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
The Company considers highly liquid investments such as time
deposits and certificates of deposit with an original maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
(e) Restricted
Cash:
Restricted cash may include (i) retention accounts which
can only be used to fund the loan installments coming due;
(ii) minimum liquidity requirements under the loan
facilities; (iii) taxes withheld from employees and
deposited in designated bank accounts; and (iv) amounts
pledged as collateral for bank guarantees to suppliers.
In terms of the loan agreements, restricted cash includes
additional minimum cash deposits required to be maintained with
certain banks under the Companys borrowing arrangements.
(f) Trade
Accounts Receivable:
The amount shown as accounts receivable, trade, at each balance
sheet date, includes receivables from charterers for hire of
drilling rigs and related billings, net of a provision for
doubtful accounts. At each balance sheet date, all potentially
uncollectible accounts are assessed individually for purposes of
determining the appropriate provision for doubtful accounts.
There were no provisions for doubtful debt at May 14, 2008.
(g) Related
parties:
Parties are related if one party has the ability, directly or
indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant
influence over the other party in making financial and operating
decisions. Parties are also related if they are subject to
common control or common significant influence. Related parties
also include members of the Companys or its parent
companys management or owners and their immediate families
(Note 4).
(h) Derivatives:
The Companys derivatives include interest rate swaps and
foreign currency forward contracts. The guidance on accounting
for certain derivative instruments and certain hedging
activities requires all derivative instruments to be recorded on
the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at
its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
(i) Hedge
Accounting:
At the inception of a hedge relationship, the Company formally
designates and documents the hedge relationship to which the
Company wishes to apply hedge accounting and the risk management
objective and strategy undertaken for the hedge. The
documentation includes identification of the hedging instrument,
hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged
and how the entity will assess the hedging instruments
effectiveness in offsetting exposure to changes in the hedged
items cash flows attributable to the hedged risk. Such
hedges are expected to be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in cash flows and are assessed on an ongoing
basis to determine whether they actually have been highly
effective throughout the financial reporting periods for which
they were designated. The Company is party to interest swap
agreements where it receives a floating interest rate and pays a
fixed interest rate for a certain period in exchange. Certain
contracts which meet the criteria for hedge accounting are
accounted for as cash flow hedges.
A cash flow hedge is a hedge of the exposure to variability in
cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated
with a recognized asset or liability, or a highly probable
forecasted transaction that could affect profit or loss.
F-8
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging
instrument is recognized directly as a component of other
comprehensive income in equity, while any ineffective portion,
if any, is recognized immediately in current period earnings.
The Company discontinues cash flow hedge accounting if the
hedging instrument expires and it no longer meets the criteria
for hedge accounting or designation is revoked by the Company.
At that time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging
instrument recognized in equity is kept in equity until the
forecasted transaction occurs. When the forecasted transaction
occurs, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument is
recognized in profit or loss. If a hedged transaction is no
longer expected to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss
recognized in equity is transferred to net profit or loss for
the year as financial income or expense.
(ii) Other
Derivatives:
Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that have
not been designated as hedging instruments are reported in
current period earnings under Gain/(loss) on interest rate
swaps and Other income/ (expenses).
(i) Guidance
Fair Value Measurements:
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the guidance
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. In
addition, on January 1, 2008, the Company made no election
to account for its monetary assets and liabilities at fair
values as allowed by ASU guidance for financial instruments
(Note 8).
(j) Concentration
of Credit Risk:
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally
of cash and cash equivalents; trade accounts receivable and
derivative contracts (interest rate swaps and foreign currency
contracts). The Company places its cash and cash equivalents,
consisting mostly of deposits, with qualified financial
institutions. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the
relative credit standing of those financial institutions. The
Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of
non-performance by counter parties to derivative instruments;
however, the Company limits its exposure by diversifying among
counter parties. The Companys customers are mainly major
oil companies. The credit risk has therefore determined by the
Company to be low. When considered necessary, additional
arrangements are put in place to minimize credit risk, such as
letters of credit or other forms of payment guarantees. The
Company limits its credit risk with trade accounts receivable by
performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers
financial condition and generally does not require collateral
for its trade accounts receivable.
(k) Capitalized
interest:
Interest expenses are capitalized during construction of
newbuildings based on accumulated expenditures for the
applicable project at the Companys current rate of
borrowing. The amount of interest expense capitalized in an
accounting period is determined by applying an interest rate
(the capitalization rate) to the average amount of
accumulated expenditures for the asset during the period. The
capitalization rates used in an accounting period are based on
the rates applicable to borrowings outstanding during the
period. The Company does not capitalize amounts beyond the
actual interest expense incurred in the period.
If the Companys financing plans associate a specific new
borrowing with a qualifying asset, the Company uses the rate on
that borrowing as the capitalization rate to be applied to that
portion of the average accumulated expenditures for the asset
that does not exceed the amount of that borrowing. If average
accumulated expenditures for the asset exceed the amounts of
specific new borrowings associated with the a asset, the
capitalization rate to be applied to such excess shall be a
weighted average of the rates applicable to other borrowings of
the Company.
F-9
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
(l) Drilling
Rigs, Machinery and Equipment, Net:
Drilling rigs are stated at historical cost less accumulated
depreciation. Such costs include the cost of adding or replacing
parts of drilling rig machinery and equipment when that cost is
incurred, if the recognition criteria are met. The recognition
criteria require that the cost incurred extends the useful life
of a drilling rig. The carrying amounts of those parts that are
replaced are written off and the cost of the new parts is
capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis
over the useful life of the assets as follows: bare deck
30 years and other asset parts 5 to 15 years.
Drilling rig machinery and equipment, IT and office equipment,
are recorded at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives, for Drilling rig
machinery and equipment over 5-15 years and for IT and
office equipment over 5 years.
(m) Leases:
The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains a
lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception
date and considers whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is
dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or the
arrangement conveys a right to use the asset. A reassessment is
made after inception of the lease only if one of the following
applies:
a) There is a change in contractual terms, other than a
renewal or extension of the arrangement;
b) A renewal option is exercised or extension granted,
unless the term of the renewal or extension was initially
included in the lease term;
c) There is a change in the determination of whether
fulfillment is dependent on a specified asset; or
d) There is a substantial change of asset.
Where a reassessment is made, lease accounting commences or
ceases from the date when the change in circumstances gives rise
to the reassessment for scenarios a), c) or d) and the
date of renewal or extension period for scenario b).
(n) Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets:
The Company reviews for impairment long-lived assets held and
used whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. In
this respect, when required, the Company reviews its assets for
impairment on drilling rig by drilling rig basis. When the
estimate of undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges,
expected to be generated by the use of the asset is less than
its carrying amount, the Company evaluates the asset for
impairment loss. The impairment loss is determined by the
difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the fair
value of the asset.
As at May 14, 2008, the Company performed an
impairment review of the Companys long-lived assets due to
the global economic downturn, the significant decline in charter
rates in the drillship industry and the outlook of the oil
services industry. The Company compared undiscounted cash flows
with the carrying values of the Companys long-lived assets
to determine if the assets were impaired. In developing
estimates of future cash flows, the Company relied upon
assumptions made by management with regard to the Companys
drilling rigs, including future charter rates, utilization
rates, operating expenses, future dry docking costs and the
estimated remaining useful lives of the drilling rigs.
These assumptions are based on historical trends as well as
future expectations in line with the Companys historical
performance and the Companys expectations for future fleet
utilization under its current fleet deployment strategy, and are
consistent with the plans and forecasts used by management to
conduct its business. The
F-10
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions,
including uncertainty about future events and general economic
conditions; therefore, the Companys accounting estimates
might change from period to period. As a result of the
impairment review, the Company determined that the carrying
amounts of its assets held for use were recoverable, and
therefore, concluded that no impairment loss was necessary for
2008.
(o) Deferred
Financing Costs:
Deferred financing costs include fees, commissions and legal
expenses associated with the Companys long- term debt and
are recorded net with the underlying debt. These costs are
amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective
interest method and are included in interest expense.
Unamortized fees relating to loans repaid or refinanced as debt
extinguishments are expensed as interest and finance costs in
the period the repayment or extinguishment is made.
(p) Pension
and retirement benefit obligation:
The Company has five retirement benefit plans for employees,
which are managed and funded through Norwegian life insurance
companies. The projected benefit obligations are calculated
based on projected unit credit method, and compared with the
fair value of pension assets.
Because a significant portion of the pension liability will not
be paid until well into the future, numerous assumptions have to
be made when estimating the pension liability at the balance
sheet date. The assumption may be split into two categories;
actuarial assumptions and financial assumptions. The actuarial
assumptions are unbiased, mutually compatible and represent the
Companys best estimates of the variables. The financial
assumptions are based on market expectations at the balance
sheet date, for the period over which the obligations are to be
settled. Due to the long-term nature of the pension obligations,
they are discounted to present value.
The funded status or net amount of the projected benefit
obligations and pension asset (net pension liability or net
pension asset) of each defined of its defined benefit plans, is
recorded in the balance sheet under the captions long-term
liabilities and non-current assets with an offsetting amount in
accumulated other comprehensive income for any amounts of
actuary gains of losses or prior service cost that has not been
amortized to income.
Net pension costs (benefit earned during the period including
interest on the projected benefit obligation, less estimated
return on pension assets and amortization of accumulated changes
in estimates) are included in General and administrative
expenses (administrative employees) and Rig operating
expenses (rig employees).
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized as income or expense
when the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses
for each individual plan at the end of the previous reporting
year exceed 10% of the higher of the present value of the
defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at
that date. These gains and losses are recognized over the
expected average remaining working lives of the employees
participating in the plans.
(q) Provisions:
A provision is recognized in the balance sheet when the Company
has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a
past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic
benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a
reliable estimate of the amount can be made. If the effect is
material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected
future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate,
the risks specific to the liability.
F-11
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
(r)
|
Revenue
and Related Expenses:
|
Revenues: The Companys services and
deliverables are generally sold based upon contracts with its
customers that include fixed or determinable prices. The Company
recognizes revenue when delivery occurs as directed by our
customer or the customer assumes control of physical use of the
asset and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company
evaluates if there are multiple-deliverables within its
contracts and whether the agreement conveys the right to use the
drill rigs for a stated period of time and meet the criteria for
lease accounting, in addition to providing a drilling services
element, which are generally compensated for by day rates. In
connection with drilling contracts, the Company may also receive
revenues for preparation and mobilization of equipment and
personnel or for capital improvements to the drilling rigs and
day rate or fixed price mobilization and demobilization fees.
There are two types of drilling contracts: well contracts and
term contracts.
Well contracts: These are contracts where the
assignment is to drill a certain number of wells. Revenue from
day rate based compensation for drilling operations is
recognized in the period during which the services are rendered
at the rates established in the contracts. All mobilization
revenues, direct incremental expenses of mobilization and
contributions from customers for capital improvements initially
deferred and recognized as revenues over the estimated duration
of the drilling period. To the extent that expenses exceed
revenue to be recognized, it is expensed as incurred.
Demobilization revenues and expenses are recognized over the
demobilization period. All revenues for well contracts are
recognized as Service revenues in the statement of
operations.
Term contracts: These are contracts where the
assignment is to operate the unit for a specified period of
time. For these types of contracts the Company determines
whether the arrangement is a multiple element arrangement
containing both a lease element and drilling services element.
For revenues derived from contracts that contain a lease, the
lease elements are recognized as Leasing revenues in
the statement of operations on a basis approximating straight
line over the lease period. The drilling services element is
recognized as Service revenues in the period in
which the services are rendered at rates at fair value. Revenues
related to the drilling element of mobilization and direct
incremental expenses of drilling services are deferred and
recognized over the estimated duration of the drilling period.
To the extent that expenses exceed revenue to be recognized, it
is expensed as incurred. Demobilization fees and expenses are
recognized over the demobilization period. Contributions from
customers for capital improvements are initially deferred and
recognized as revenues over the estimated duration of the
drilling contract.
(s) Class
costs:
The Company follows the direct expense method of accounting for
periodic class costs incurred during special surveys of drilling
rigs, normally every five years. Class costs and other
maintenance costs are expensed in the period incurred and
included in drilling rigs operating expenses.
(t) Foreign
Currency Translation:
The functional currency of the Company is the U.S. Dollar
since the Company operates in international shipping and
drilling markets, and therefore primarily transacts business in
U.S. Dollars. The Companys accounting records are
maintained in U.S. Dollars. Transactions involving other
currencies during the year are converted into U.S. Dollars
using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the
transactions. At the balance sheet dates, monetary assets and
liabilities, which are denominated in other currencies, are
translated into U.S. Dollars at the year-end exchange
rates. Resulting gains or losses are included in General
and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
F-12
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
(u) Income
Taxes:
Income taxes have been provided for based upon the tax laws and
rates in effect in the countries in which the Companys
operations are conducted and income is earned. There is no
expected relationship between the provision for/or benefit from
income taxes and income or loss before income taxes because the
countries in which the Company operates have taxation regimes
that vary not only with respect to the nominal rate, but also in
terms of the availability of deductions, credits and other
benefits. Variations also arise because income earned and taxed
in any particular country or countries may fluctuate from year
to year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences
between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of the
Company assets and liabilities using the applicable
jurisdictional tax rates in effect at the year end. A valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more
likely than not that some or all of the benefit from the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company accrues
interest and penalties related to its liabilities for
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
(v) Stock-based
compensation:
Stock-based compensation represents non-vested common stock
granted to employees and directors, for their services. The
Company calculates total compensation expense for the award
based on its fair value on the grant date and amortizes the
total compensation on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period of the award or service period.
(w) Earnings/(loss)
per Common Share:
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by
dividing net income available to common stockholder s by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the year. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised. Dilution has
been computed using the treasury stock method.
(x) Business
segment:
Offshore drilling operations represent the Companys only
segment.
(y) Treasury
Stock:
The Company accounts for treasury stock using the par-value
method, whereby only the par value of acquired treasury shares
is reflected as a separate component of stockholders
equity.
(z) Recent
accounting pronouncements:
In December 2007, new guidance, an amendment of ARB No. 51,
established accounting and reporting standards for ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The new
guidance also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The above-mentioned
guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and will be adopted by the Company in
the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The new guidance related to presentation
and disclosure was retroactively applied to the consolidated
statements as required.
F-13
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
3.
|
Transactions
with Related Parties:
|
As of May 14, 2008, the Company had an account receivable
of $15 due from DryShips. The amount was related to certain
reimbursable expenses. There were no transactions between the
Company and DryShips that had an impact on the statement of
operations.
Restricted cash includes cash pledged as collateral for bank
guarantees to suppliers and to employee tax withholding amounts,
as well as minimum cash requirement under the facility at
May 14, 2008.
The amounts included in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
Amount pledged as collateral for bank guarantees to suppliers
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Taxes withheld from employees
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
Minimum cash requirement
|
|
|
29,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are
analyzed as follows:
Drilling
rigs, machinery and equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,388,484
|
|
|
|
(246,714
|
)
|
|
|
1,141,771
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
10,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,463
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,367
|
)
|
|
|
(19,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance May 14, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,398,947
|
|
|
|
(266,081
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,132,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 14, 2008, all of the Companys drilling rigs
have been pledged as collateral to secure the bank loans
(Note 6).
The amount of long-term debt shown in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets is analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Loan Facilities
|
|
$
|
776,000
|
|
Less: Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(4,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
771,505
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(490,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
281,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
Loan
Facilities
a) 450,000
Credit Facility
On June 13, 2005, the Company entered into a 450,000
Credit Facility agreement with a bank to refinance
outstanding debt and for general corporate purposes.
The facility includes a reducing revolving credit facility of
$430,000 and a non-reducing $20,000 guarantee and hedging
facility. The reducing revolving credit facility consists of
three tranches of $280,000 (tranche A), $100,000
(tranche B) and $50,000 (tranche C). A
tranche D of $60,000 was established in February 2007.
The table below shows the current commitment and utilization of
the facility as per May 14, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment
|
|
|
Utilization
|
|
|
Tranche A
|
|
$
|
227,500
|
|
|
$
|
227,500
|
|
Tranche B
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Tranche C
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Tranche D
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Tranche E
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Facility
|
|
$
|
526,000
|
|
|
$
|
526,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted guarantee and hedging facility
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 17, 2008, $171,000 was drawn as short- term debt
on the facility (Tranche E) to refinance the 2005
Notes described below.
The facility includes covenants typical for bank loans,
including inter-alia restrictions on additional indebtedness,
creation of liens, sale of assets, payments of dividends,
minimum unrestricted cash and certain financial covenants such
as interest cover ratio, gearing ratio, maintaining a positive
working capital and minimum value adjusted equity. The Company
was in compliance with all financial covenants at May 14,
2008.
The borrower under the loan agreement is Ocean Rig Norway AS. In
addition Ocean Rig ASA and the two rig companies owning Leiv
Eiriksson and Eirik Raude have fully and
unconditionally guaranteed the Facility on a joint and several
basis. The facility is secured by a first priority mortgage in
respect of Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude and
related assets.
Interest is payable at the end of each interest period, at least
semi-annually in arrears.
Interest on the facility accrues at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a
variable margin, which will be calculated quarterly based on the
aggregate value of the Companys contract backlog as of the
end of the previous quarter. Interest is payable at the end of
each interest period, at least semi-annually in arrears.
b) 1,040,000
Credit Facility
On December 7, 2007, the Company received a $1,020,000
Credit Facility commitment from a Bank. The new facility was
planned to refinance outstanding debt and is also for general
corporate purposes. The refinancing was executed with a
five-year secured credit facility for a final amount of up to
$1,040,000 (1,040,000 Credit Facility) on
September 17, 2008. In September and October 2008, Ocean
Rig drew down $1,020, 000 of the new credit facility. The
drawdown proceeds were used to repay all other Ocean Rig
outstanding debt at the date of the drawdown, amounting $776,000.
The new 1,040,000 Credit Facility includes covenants typical for
bank loans, including inter alia restrictions on additional
indebtedness, creation of liens, sale of assets, payments of
dividends, minimum unrestricted cash and
F-15
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
certain financial covenants such as interest cover ratio,
gearing ratio, maintaining a positive working capital and
minimum value adjusted equity.
c) 2005
Notes
At December 31, 2007, the Company had long-term 8.375%
fixed rate notes outstanding with a face value of
$150 million. The 2005 Notes were issued in June 2005. The
2005 Notes mature in June 2013.
The 2005 Notes, contain covenants typical in bond financing
(including inter alia restrictions on additional indebtedness,
creation of liens, sale of assets and payments of dividends) and
are fully redeemable from July 2, 2009 at redemption price
of 104.2%, reducing to 102.1% from July, 2010 and at par from
July 1, 2011.
The borrower, under the loan agreement, is Ocean Rig Norway AS.
In addition, Ocean Rig ASA and the two subsidiary companies
owning Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude have fully
and unconditionally guaranteed the 2005 Notes on a joint and
several basis. The 2005 Notes are secured by a
second priority charge in respect of Leiv Eiriksson and
Eirik Raude and related assets (subordinated to the loan
facility, described above).
On March 18, 2008, the Company launched a tender offer for
the notes. On April 17, 2008, the Company repaid the notes,
including accrued interests and redemption costs, with
$171 million of financing raised under the existing
facility.
d) 2006
Notes
The long-term floating rate notes had a face value of
$250 million. The 2006 Notes were issued in March 2006. The
2006 Notes matured in April 2011.
Interest on the 2006 Notes accrues at a rate equal to Libor plus
a margin. The 2006 Notes contain covenants typical in bond
financing (including inter alia restrictions on additional
indebtedness, creation of liens, sale of assets and payments of
dividends) and are fully redeemable at a redemption price of
101.25% of par value (plus accrued interest) until April 3,
2008, and will thereafter in six months intervals gradually be
reduced to 100.25% (plus accrued interest) from October 4,
2009. The bonds mature in April 2011.
The Notes are senior unsecured and callable.
The 2006 Notes contained a provision allowing noteholders to
require the repayment of bonds at par value when there is change
of control in the Company. Further, there is a mandatory
redemption clause requiring the repayment of bonds at 101% of
the face value if the shares of Company were delisted from the
Oslo Stock Exchange. As a result of the acquisition of Ocean Rig
shares by Primelead Ltd., $16,000 of the bonds were repaid at
par, during the third quarter of 2008. On July 29, 2008
$234,000 of bonds were redeemed at 101% of face value as a
result of the de-listing from the Oslo Stock Exchange. The bonds
were repaid by drawing a total of $250,000 from the existing
450,000 credit Facility.
Total interest incurred on long-term debt, including accrued
interest, for the period ended May 14, 2008 amounted to
$18,360. This amount is included in Interest and finance
costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. The Companys weighted average interest rate
(including the margin) as of May 14, 2008 was 5.12%.
F-16
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
The principal payments to be made after May 14, 2008, for
the loans discussed above, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
488,500
|
|
2009
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
2010
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
207,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
|
776,000
|
|
Less: Financing fees
|
|
|
(4,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
771,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No interest was capitalized in either period as there were no
qualifying assets under construction.
|
|
7.
|
Financial
Instruments and Fair Value Measurements:
|
All derivatives are carried at fair value on the consolidated
balance sheet at each period end. Balances as of May 14,
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Swaps
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
Non current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 Interest
rate swaps:
As of May 14, 2008, the Company had outstanding two
interest rate swap agreements with nominal amount of $140,000,
maturing in August 2008. This agreement was entered into in
order to hedge the Companys exposure to interest rate
fluctuations with respect to the Companys borrowings. This
contract is designated for hedge accounting and as such changes
in its fair values are included in other comprehensive loss. The
fair value of this agreement equates to the amount that would be
paid by the Company if the agreements was cancelled at the
reporting date, taking into account current interest rates and
creditworthiness of the Company.
7.2 Foreign
currency forward contracts:
As of May 14, 2008, the Company had outstanding 24 forward
contracts, to sell $31,000 for NOK174,910. These agreements are
entered into in order to hedge its exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations. Such fair value at May 14, 2008 was an asset
of $923.
The change in the fair value of such agreements for the period
ended May 14, 2008 amounted to a loss of $0 and is
reflected under Other, net in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations.
F-17
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
Tabular disclosure of financial instruments is as follows:
Fair
Values of Derivative Instruments in the Statement of Financial
Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
Derivatives Designated as
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments non current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments current liabilities
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
Financial instruments-current assets
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
Financial instruments-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement to
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
|
|
in OCI on Derivative
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Derivatives Designated for Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
No portion of the cash flow hedges shown above was ineffective
during the year. In addition, the Company did not transfer any
gains/losses on the hedges from accumulated OCI into statement
of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
(Loss) for the
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either
assets or liabilities at fair value on its consolidated balance
sheet. The Company has designated all qualifying interest rate
swap contracts as cash flow hedges, with the last qualifying
contract expiring in September 2013.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on
the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative
F-18
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in
the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments that have not been
designated as hedging instruments are reported in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
The Company enters into interest rate swap transactions to
manage interest costs and risk associated with changing interest
rates with respect to its variable interest rate loans and
credit facilities. The Company enters into foreign currency
forward contracts in order to manage risks associated with
future hire rates and fluctuations in foreign currencies,
respectively. All of the Companys derivative transactions
are entered into for risk management purposes.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash and trade accounts receivable reported in the consolidated
balance sheets approximate their respective fair values because
of the short term nature of these accounts. The fair value of
the interest rate swaps was determined using a discounted cash
flow method based on market-based LIBOR swap yield curves,
taking into account current interest rates and the
creditworthiness of both the financial instrument counterparty
and the Company. The fair value of foreign currency forward
contracts was based on the forward exchange rates.
Fair value measurements are classified based upon inputs used to
develop the measurement under the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs
or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not
corroborated by market data.
The following table summarizes the valuation of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
the valuation date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps-liability position
|
|
$
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts asset position
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has five retirement benefit plans for employees
managed and funded through Norwegian life insurance companies.
As of May 14, 2008, the pension plans cover
115 employees. The pension scheme is in compliance with the
Norwegian law on required occupational pension.
The Company uses a January 1 measurement date for net periodic
benefit cost and a December 31 or period end measurement date
for benefit obligations and plan assets.
For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the
projected benefit obligation, the actuarial present value, as of
the Companys December 31 measurement data, of all benefits
attributed by the pension benefit
F-19
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
formula to employee service rendered to that date. The amount
for benefit to be paid depends on a number of future events
incorporated into the pension benefit formula, including
estimates of the average life of employees/survivors and average
years of service rendered. It is measured based on assumptions
concerning future interest rates and future employee
compensation levels.
The following table presents this reconsolidation and shows the
change in the projected benefit obligation for the periods ended
May 14, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Change in pension benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefits earned at beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
7,234
|
|
Service cost for benefits earned
|
|
|
884
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
120
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
547
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
190
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Payroll tax of employer contribution
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the change in the value of plan
assets and the plans funded status at May 14, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
6,376
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
140
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
543
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Unfunded status at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unfunded projected benefit obligation is reflected in
Pension liability in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets as of May 14, 2008.
F-20
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
Amounts including in accumulated other comprehensive income that
have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost at
May 14, 2008, are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
6,130
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(2,746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan adjustment, before tax effect
|
|
$
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans
represents the actuarial present value of benefit based on
employee service and compensation as of a certain date and does
not include an assumption about future compensation levels. The
accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $4,526
at May 14, 2008.
The net pension cost recognized in consolidated statements of
income was $1,130 for May 14, 2008.
The following table presents the components of net periodic
pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
Service cost
|
|
|
883
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
120
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
190
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
77
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents the components of changes in Plan
Assets and Benefit Obligations recognized in Other Comprehensive
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
2,679
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net pension cost and other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss for pension benefits that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into the
periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year is $0.
Pension obligations are actuarially determined and are affected
by assumptions including expected return on plan assets. As of
May 14, 2008, contributions amounting to $543 in total have
been made to the pension plan.
The Company evaluates assumptions regarding the estimated
long-term rate of return on plan assets based on historical
experience and future expectations on investment returns, which
are calculated by an unaffiliated investment advisor utilizing
the asset allocation classes held by the plans portfolios.
Changes in these and other
F-21
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
assumptions used in the actuarial computations could impact the
Companys projected benefit obligations, pension
liabilities, pension expense and other comprehensive income.
The Company bases its determination of pension expense on a
market-related valuation of assets that reduces
year-to-year
volatility. This market-related valuation recognizes investment
gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which
they occur. Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the
difference between the expected return calculated using the
market-related value of assets and the actual return based on
the market-related value of assets.
The following are the weighted average assumptions
used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Compensation increases
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
The Company reviews its investments and policies annually. In
determining its asset allocation strategy, the Company reviews
models presenting many different asset allocation scenarios to
assess the most appropriate target allocation to produce
long-term gains without taking on undue risk. GAAP standards
require disclosures for financial assets and liabilities that
are remeasured at fair value at least annually.
The following table set forth the pension assets at fair value
as of May 14, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Share and other equity investments
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
Properties and real estate
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total plan net assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
6,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys pension funds are managed by an independent
life-insurance company that invests the Companys funds
according to Norwegian law. The law requires a low-risk profile;
hence the majority of the funds are invested in government bonds
and high-rated corporate bonds. The major categories of plan
assets as a percentage of the fair value of plan assets are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Shares and other equity instruments
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Bonds
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Properties and real estate
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
The US GAAP standards require disclosures for financial assets
and liabilities that are remeasured at fair value at least
annually. The US GAAP standards establish a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value. Tiers include three levels which is explained below:
Level 1:
Financial instruments valued on the basis of quoted priced for
identical assets in active markets. This category encompasses
listed equities that over the previous six months have
experienced a daily average turnover equivalent to approximately
$3,462 or more. Based on this, the equities are regarded as
sufficiently liquid to be encompassed by this level. Bonds,
certificates or equivalent instruments issued by national
governments are generally classified as level 1. In the
case of derivatives, standardized equity-linked and interest
rate futures will be encompassed by this level.
Level 2:
Financial instruments valued on the basis of observable market
information not covered by level 1. This category
encompasses financial instruments that are valued on the basis
of market information that can be directly observable or
indirectly observable. Market information that is indirectly
observable means that prices can be derived from observable,
related markets. Level 2 encompasses equities or equivalent
equity instruments for which market prices are available, but
where the turnover volume is too limited to meet the criteria in
level 1. Equities on this level will normally have been
traded during the last month. Bonds and equivalent instruments
are generally classified as level 2. Interest rate and
currency swaps, non-standardized interest rate and currency
derivatives, and credit default swaps are also classified as
level 2. Funds are generally classified as level 2,
and encompass equity, interest rate, and hedge funds.
Level 3:
Financial instruments valued on the basis of information that is
not observable pursuant to by level 2. Equities classified
as level 3 encompass investments in primarily
unlisted/private companies. These include investments in
forestry, real estate and infrastructure. Private equity is
generally classified as level 3 through direct investments
or investments in funds. Asset backed securities (ABS),
residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) and commercial
mortgage backed securities (CMBS) are classified as level 3
due to their generally limited liquidity and transparency in the
market. Storebrand is of the opinion that the valuation method
used represents a best estimate of the mutual funds market
value.
F-23
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value
hierarchy, the pension asset at fair value as of May 14,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Equities
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Non-US Equities
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
Fixed Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Bonds
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Alternative Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge funds and limited partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Other
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Plan Net Assets
|
|
$
|
4,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
1,161
|
|
|
$
|
6,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below set forth a summary of changes in the fair
value of the pension assets level 3 investment assets for
the period ended May 14, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
Actual return on plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets sold during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets still held at reporting date
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (net)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Plan Net Assets
|
|
$
|
1,161
|
|
|
$
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following pension benefits are expected to be paid by the
Company during the years ending:
|
|
|
|
|
The period from May 14, to December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
42
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
82
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
76
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
77
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
58
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension payments
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys estimated contribution to the pension plans
for the period from May, 15 to December, 31 2008 and for the
fiscal year 2009 is $3,880.
F-24
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
9.
|
Drilling
Rig Operating Expenses:
|
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2008 to
|
|
|
|
May, 2008
|
|
|
Crew wages and related costs
|
|
$
|
30,723
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
3,989
|
|
Deferred rig operating cost
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
12,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Interest
and Finance Cost:
|
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
$
|
18,360
|
|
Bank charges
|
|
|
753
|
|
Amortization of financing fees
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Stock-based
compensation:
|
The Companys Extraordinary General Meeting on
March 22, 2006, approved establishment of a new
5-year
equity settled stock option program for employees and members of
the Board of the Company and its subsidiaries comprising up to
5,000,000 Shares (The
2006-2011
Stock Option Program). Of the total number of options
granted, one third vested at each anniversary of the initial
grant date, assuming the employee had not resigned or otherwise
breached the vesting conditions of the option agreement. It was
therefore a program with graded vesting where each of the three
vesting steps was treated as separate programs. Awarded options
must be exercised no later than the fifth anniversary of the
grant date.
When DryShips Inc. acquired over 50% of the shares in Ocean Rig
ASA on May 14, 2008 a change of control occurred and this
had the implication that all options immediately became vested
and exercisable.
On June 5, 2008, members of the Board and employees
exercised a total of 1,440,000 options in Ocean Rig ASA at a
volume weighted average strike price of NOK 40.62.
As a result of this exercise, Ocean Rig sold 1,440,000 Ocean Rig
shares at a volume weighted average price of NOK 40.62 per share
to members of the Board and employees. Following the exercise of
options there were no options outstanding.
F-25
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
The following table summarizes activity for the Companys
outstanding stock options from December 31, 2006 through
May 14, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price Equal to or Greater than Grant
|
|
|
|
Date Share Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,742,500
|
|
|
|
45.52
|
|
Exercised during 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
365,000
|
|
|
|
39.06
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,667,500
|
)
|
|
|
46.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 14, 2008
|
|
|
1,440,000
|
|
|
|
40.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2008, the following options had been granted
and were vested:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(NOK)
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
233,333
|
|
|
|
46.25
|
|
Members of the Board
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
233,333
|
|
|
|
44.34
|
|
Management
|
|
|
2,737,500
|
|
|
|
1,167,500
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
Others
|
|
|
605,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
43.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,742,500
|
|
|
|
1,764,166
|
|
|
|
45.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value is calculated using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model and is expensed evenly over the vesting
period for the share options and is included in salaries and
other personnel expenses. However, when all options became
vested on May 14, 2008 the remaining fair value was
expensed immediately. Share option expense in 2008 was $2,675
and this was expensed in the period ended May 14, 2008.
|
|
12.
|
Earnings/(loss)
per share
|
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net profit/
(loss) for the year by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net
profit/(loss) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding during the year plus the weighted average number of
ordinary shares that would have been issued on the conversion of
options into ordinary shares.
The following reflects the income and the share data used in the
basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(Loss)
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
|
Applicable to
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Basic Earnings/
|
|
|
Applicable to
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
(Loss) per
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
(Loss) per
|
|
|
Diluted Shares
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share Amount
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
For the year ended May 14, 2008:
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
162,171,380
|
|
|
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
162,171,380
|
|
|
|
(0.14
|
)
|
F-26
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
Ocean Rig, the holding company of the drilling segment and some
of its subsidiaries are incorporated and domiciled in Norway,
and as such, are in general subject to Norwegian income tax of
28%. Participation exemption normally applies to equity
investments in the EEA (European Economic Area) except
investments in low-tax countries. The model may also apply to
investments outside of the EEA (except low-tax countries) to the
extent the investment for the last two years have constituted at
least 10% of the capital and votes in the entity in question.
The Norwegian entities are subject to the Norwegian
participation exemption model which implies that only 3% of
dividend income and capital gains that are received by Norwegian
companies are subject to tax. In effect this gives an effective
tax of total income under the participation exemption for
Norwegian companies of 0.84% (3% * 28%).
Ocean Rig ASA operates through its various subsidiaries in a
number of countries throughout the world. Income taxes have been
provided based upon the tax laws and rates in the countries in
which operations are conducted and income is earned. The
countries in which Ocean Rig ASA operates have taxation regimes
with varying nominal rates, deductions, credits and other tax
attributes. Consequently, there is not expected relationship
between the provision for/or benefit from income taxes and
income or loss before income taxes.
A summary of income/(loss) before tax, annual tax expense, the
tax effects of temporary and permanent differences and the
calculation of deferred tax are presented below.
Allocation of income/(loss) before tax are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Norway
|
|
$
|
(17,146
|
)
|
UK
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Canada
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
USA
|
|
|
(4,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(21,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below shows for each entitys total income tax
expense and provision/(benefit) for income taxes for the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Norway (28%)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
UK (28%)
|
|
|
772
|
|
Canada (10% 19%)
|
|
|
|
|
USA (15% 35%)
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax expense
|
|
$
|
1, 637
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
$
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes have not been calculated on OCI items as valuation
allowances would result in no recognition of deferred tax.
F-27
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
Reconciliation of total tax cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Tax rate of 28% (Norwegian tax rate) multiplied by profit/(loss)
before tax
|
|
$
|
(6,093
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
25,082
|
|
Differences in tax rates
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
Effect of permanent differences
|
|
|
18,162
|
|
Changes in assessment of tax loss carry forward and other
differences
|
|
|
(41,286
|
)
|
Withholding tax
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the completion of the Eirik Raude operations in
Canada 2002 2004, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)
has suggested changing the Canadian 2002 2005 tax
returns for Ocean Rig 2 AS. This may reduce the tax loss carry
forward in Canada. However, it will not impact the tax loss
carry forward in Norway. There is no indication that there will
be any tax payable to Canada resulting from such changes.
Ocean Rig is subject to changes in tax laws, treaties,
regulations and interpretations in and between the countries in
which its subsidiaries operate. A material change in these tax
laws, treaties, regulations and interpretations could result in
a higher or lower effective tax rate on worldwide earnings.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between
the financial statement basis and the tax basis of the
Companys assets and liabilities at the applicable tax
rates in effect. The significant components of deferred tax
assets and liabilities are as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
Temporary Differences Tax Effects
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
Tax loss carry forwards
|
|
|
296,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
297,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation of assets for tax purposes
|
|
|
(198,134
|
)
|
Pension assets
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(197,370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
99,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(99,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
374
|
|
Short-term portion of valuation allowance
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
Long-term net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
99,560
|
|
Long-term portion of valuation allowance
|
|
|
(99,560
|
)
|
F-28
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
Based on the Companys historical taxable losses and the
lack of certainty regarding the size of future taxable profits,
the realization of the deferred tax assets is uncertain.
Accordingly, no deferred tax asset has been included in the
balance sheet as a valuation allowance has been recorded as of
May 14, 2008.
Deferred taxes have not been provided for in circumstances where
the Company does not expect the operations in a jurisdiction to
give rise to future tax consequences, due to the structure of
operations and applicable law. Should its expectations change
regarding the expected future tax consequences, the Company may
be required to record additional deferred taxes that could have
a material adverse effect on its consolidated statement of
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when
it is more likely than not that some or all of the benefit from
the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company
provides a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets for
net operating losses (NOL) incurred during the year
in certain jurisdictions and for other deferred tax assets
where, in the Companys opinion, it is more likely than not
that the financial statement benefit of these losses will not be
realized. The Company provides a valuation allowance for foreign
tax loss carry forward to reflect the possible expiration of
these benefits prior to their utilization.
The Company has tax losses, which arose in Norway of $1,023,253
at May 14, 2008, that are available indefinitely for offset
against future taxable profits of the companies in which the
losses arose. All of these amounts are related to Ocean Rig ASA,
Ocean Rig Norway AS, Ocean Rig 1 AS and Ocean Rig 2 AS.
The Company had tax losses, which arose in Canada of $28,846 at
May 14, 2008, that are available indefinitely for offset
against future taxable profits of the company in which the
losses arose. The tax loss in Canada may be deducted in the
future only against income and proceeds of disposition derived
from resource properties owned at the time of the acquisition of
control, or the Weymouth well. Thus the possibility for
utilization of this tax position is in practice expired for the
period after the change of control in Ocean Rig on May 14,
2008.
The Companys income tax returns are subject to review and
examination in the various jurisdictions in which the Company
operates. Currently one tax audit is open. The Company may
contest any tax assessment that deviates from its tax filing.
However, this review is not expected to incur any tax payables.
The Company accrues for income tax contingencies that it
believes are more likely than not exposures in accordance with
the provisions of guidance related to accounting for uncertainty
in income taxes.
The Company accrues interest and penalties related to its
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
income tax expense. During the period ended May 14, 2008,
the Company did not incur any interest or penalties.
Ocean Rig ASA,
and/or one
of its subsidiaries, filed federal and local tax returns in
several jurisdictions throughout the world.
The Company has one operating segment which is offshore drilling
operations and this is consistent with management reporting and
decision making.
For the period ended May 14, 2008, all of the consolidated
revenues related to the operations of the Companys two
drilling rigs.
|
|
14.1
|
Products
and services
|
The Leiv Eiriksson commenced drilling in January 2008 in
the North Sea under the Shell contract. The Shell contract was
accounted for as Term Contract as described in Note 2 (r).
Revenues derived from the contract are
F-29
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
partly accounted for as a lease, where the lease of the
applicable rig is recognized to the statement of
operation as Leasing revenue on a straight line basis over the
lease period, while the drilling services element is recognized
in the period when drilling services are rendered as Service
revenue.
Eirik Raude operated in the US Gulf of Mexico under a
contract with Exxon Mobil from 2007 until October 9, 2008,
when it commenced a three-year contract with Tullow Oil to drill
offshore Ghana. Both, the ExxonMobil and the Tullow contracts
qualify as Term Contracts, as described in Note 2 (r).
Accounting for the contract follows the same principles as
described for the Shell contract as outlined above.
As of May 15, 2008, the estimated future minimum lease
payment is $926,000 based upon an estimated 95% earnings
efficiency and the contract expires in 2011. The estimated
minimum lease payment is distributed over 2008, 2009, 2010 and
2011 with $232,000, $341,000, $224,000 and $129,000 respectively.
|
|
14.2
|
Geographic
segment information for offshore drilling
operations
|
The revenue shown in the table below is revenue per country
based upon the location that the drilling takes place related to
the Offshore Drilling Operation segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
50,922
|
|
Norway
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
UK
|
|
|
39,897
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
0
|
|
Angola
|
|
|
101
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
99,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The drilling rigs Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude
constitute the Companys long lived assets. As of
May 14, 2008, the rigs were owned by Norwegian entities.
|
|
14.3
|
Information
about Major customers:
|
The Companys customers are oil and gas exploration and
production companies, including major integrated oil companies,
independent oil and gas producers and government-owned oil and
gas companies.
Drilling contracts individually accounted for more than 10% of
the Companys drilling rig revenues during the period ended
May 14, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
|
|
Customer C
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
The loss of any of these significant customers could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations if they were not replaced by other customers.
F-30
OCEAN RIG
ASA
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of and for the period ended May 14, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
Various claims, suits, and complaints, including those involving
government regulations and product liability, arise in the
ordinary course of the shipping business.
The Company has obtained insurance for the assessed market value
of the rigs. However, such insurance coverage may not provide
sufficient funds to protect the Company from all liabilities
that could result from its operations in all situations. Risks
against which the Company may not be fully insured or insurable
for include environmental liabilities, which may result from a
blow-out or similar accident, or liabilities resulting from
reservoir damage alleged to have been caused by the negligence
of the Company.
The Companys
loss-of-hire
insurance coverage does not protect against loss of income from
day one, but will be effective after 45 days
off-hire. The occurrence of casualty or loss, against which the
Company is not fully insured, could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition. The insurance covers approximately one year with loss
of hire.
As part of the Companys normal course of operations, its
customers may disagree on amounts due to us under the provision
of the contracts which are normally settled though negotiations
with the customer. Disputed amounts are normally reflected in
revenues at such time as we reach agreement with the customer on
the amounts due. Except for the matters discussed below, the
Company is not a party to any material litigation where claims
or counterclaims have been filed against the Company other than
routine legal proceedings incidental to its business.
In the period ended May 14, 2008, the Company recognized a
provision of $3,100 for a claim that was subsequently settled in
July, from an investment bank in relation to DryShips
acquisition of Ocean Rig. Maximum exposure related to the claim
was $24,000. On July 21, 2009 Ocean Rig ASA made a
settlement with the investment bank equivalent to the provision.
Ocean Rig entered into a five year office lease agreement with
Vestre Svanholmen 6 AS which commenced on July 1, 2007.
This lease includes an option for an additional five years term
which must be exercised at least six months prior to the end of
the term of the contract which expires in June 2012. As of
May 14, 2008, the future obligations amount to $900 for
2008, $1,500 for 2009, $1,400 for 2010, $1,200 for 2011 and $700
for 2012.
F-31
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
|
|
F-32
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except for
share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
95,707
|
|
|
$
|
191,744
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
512,793
|
|
|
|
95,183
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
73,202
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 8)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
|
|
82,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
672,006
|
|
|
|
443,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS, NET:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rigs under construction (Note 5)
|
|
|
1,888,490
|
|
|
|
1,704,350
|
|
Drilling rigs, machinery and equipment, net (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,249,333
|
|
|
|
2,940,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets, net
|
|
|
3,137,823
|
|
|
|
4,645,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NON CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
125,009
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
Above market acquired time charter
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
472,193
|
|
|
|
95,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non current assets, net
|
|
|
533,869
|
|
|
|
230,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,343,698
|
|
|
$
|
5,320,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7)
|
|
$
|
560,561
|
|
|
$
|
231,218
|
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
36,676
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
45,631
|
|
|
|
76,059
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
40,205
|
|
|
|
85,194
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 8)
|
|
|
12,503
|
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
667,918
|
|
|
|
434,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, net of current portion (Note 7)
|
|
|
696,986
|
|
|
|
1,891,319
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 8)
|
|
|
96,901
|
|
|
|
87,953
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non current liabilities
|
|
|
794,698
|
|
|
|
1,980,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 0 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010
and June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized, 131,696,928 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(60,722
|
)
|
|
|
(57,103
|
)
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
3,457,444
|
|
|
|
3,467,301
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(516,957
|
)
|
|
|
(506,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,881,082
|
|
|
|
2,904,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,343,698
|
|
|
$
|
5,320,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing revenues
|
|
$
|
70,731
|
|
|
$
|
71,357
|
|
Service revenues and amortization
|
|
|
118,497
|
|
|
|
164,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
189,228
|
|
|
|
235,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
59,508
|
|
|
|
104,137
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37,966
|
|
|
|
64,908
|
|
Loss on disposals
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
81,249
|
|
|
|
51,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs (Note 9)
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(22,214
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps (Note 8)
|
|
|
(34,501
|
)
|
|
|
(18,616
|
)
|
Other, net (Note 8)
|
|
|
(3,752
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses net
|
|
|
(38,166
|
)
|
|
|
(30,882
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
43,083
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (Note 10)
|
|
|
(11,938
|
)
|
|
|
(9,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
31,145
|
|
|
$
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES, BASIC AND DILUTED
(Note 3)
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
131,696,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income (Note 12)
|
|
|
9,601
|
|
|
|
14,052
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended 30 June
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
99,055
|
|
|
|
93,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances for rigs under construction
|
|
|
(483,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,187,747
|
)
|
Drilling rigs, equipment and other improvements
|
|
|
(3,671
|
)
|
|
|
(10,009
|
)
|
Decrease/(Increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(34,178
|
)
|
|
|
346,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(521,161
|
)
|
|
|
(850,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution by stockholders
|
|
|
402,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from credit facilities
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
1,713,456
|
|
Payments of credit facilities
|
|
|
(61,119
|
)
|
|
|
(829,170
|
)
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
(31,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
341,710
|
|
|
|
852,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(80,396
|
)
|
|
|
96,037
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
234,195
|
|
|
|
95,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
153,799
|
|
|
|
191,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-35
|
|
1.
|
Basis of
Presentation and General Information:
|
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company,
Ocean Rig UDW or Group). Ocean Rig UDW
was formed under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands on December 10, 2007 under the name Primelead
Shareholders Inc.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information.
Accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes
required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
These statements and the accompanying notes should be read in
conjunction with the Companys Annual Consolidated
Financial Statements.
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual
consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal
recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the Companys financial position, results
of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Operating results for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be
expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting policies and Recent Accounting
Pronouncements:
|
A discussion of the Companys significant accounting
policies can be found in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.
There have been no material changes to these policies in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2011-04,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in
U.S. GAAP and IFRSs
(ASU 2011-04).
This newly issued accounting standard clarifies the application
of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands
the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated
using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This
ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011,
which for the Company means January 1, 2012. The Company
does not expect that adoption of this standard will have a
material impact on its financial position or results of
operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) (ASU
2011-05).
This newly issued accounting standard (1) eliminates the
option to present the components of other comprehensive income
as part of the statement of changes in stockholders
equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the
statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and
(3) requires an entity to present reclassification
adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other
comprehensive income to net income. The amendments in this ASU
do not change the items that must be reported in other
comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive
income must be reclassified to net income nor do the amendments
affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This
ASU is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods within those years
beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the Company
means January 1, 2012. As this accounting standard only
requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will
not impact the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
There is one class of common shares, and each common share is
entitled to one vote at the General Meeting.
F-36
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Prior to December 8, 2010, the Companys authorized
capital stock consisted of 500 common shares, par value $20.00
per shares. During December 2010, the Company adopted, amended
and restated articles of incorporation pursuant to which its
authorized capital stock now consists of 250,000,000 common
shares, par value $0.01 per share; and (ii) declared and
paid a stock dividend of 103,125,000 shares of its common
stock to its sole shareholder, DryShips. On December 21,
2010 the Company completed through a private placement the sale
of an aggregated of 28,571,428 common shares at $17.50 per
share. The proceeds from the private placement net of directly
attributable costs of $11,699 were $488,301. The stock dividend
has been accounted for as a stock split. As a result, the
Company reclassified approximately $1,021 from APIC to common
stock, which represents the par value per share of the shares
issued. All previously reported share and per share amounts have
been restated to reflect the stock dividend.
On April 15, 2011 the Companys Special Meeting of
Shareholders approved an increase in the Companys
authorized share capital to 1,000,000,000 common shares, and
500,000,000 preferred shares.
|
|
4.
|
Transactions
with Related Parties:
|
Drillship Management Agreements with
Cardiff: Effective December 21, 2010, the
Company terminated its management agreements with Cardiff
pursuant to which Cardiff provided supervisory services in
connection with the construction of the drillships Ocean Rig
Corcovado and Ocean Rig Olympia. The Company paid
Cardiff a management fee of $40 per month per drillship for
Ocean Rig Corcovado and Ocean Rig Olympia. The
management agreements also provided for: (i) a chartering
commission of 1.25% on revenue earned; (ii) a commission of
1% on the shipyard payments or purchase price paid for
drillships; (iii) a commission of 1% on loan financing or
refinancing; and (iv) a commission of 2% on insurance
premiums. These agreements were replaced with the Global
Services Agreement discussed below. For the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 the Company paid $5,774 and
$2,586 respectively, as fees related to the Management
Agreement. All incurred costs from management service agreements
are directly attributable cost to the construction and are
capitalized as a component of Rigs under
construction.
Global Services Agreement: On December 1,
2010, the Company entered into a Global Services Agreement with
Cardiff, effective December 21, 2010, pursuant to which the
Company has engaged Cardiff to act as consultant on matters of
chartering and sale and purchase transactions for the offshore
drilling units operated by the Company. Under the Global
Services Agreement, Cardiff, or its subcontractor,
(i) provides consulting services related to identifying,
sourcing, negotiating and arranging new employment for offshore
assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the
Companys drilling units; and (ii) identifies,
sources, negotiates and arranges the sale or purchase of the
offshore assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, including
the Companys drilling units. In consideration of such
services, the Company pays Cardiff a fee of 1.0% in connection
with employment arrangements and 0.75% in connection with sale
and purchase activities. For the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011 the Company incurred cost of $5,694 as fees
related to the Global Services Agreement of which $800 regarding
employment arrangements and $4,894 regarding sale and purchase
activities. The Company does not pay for services provided in
accordance with this agreement since equal equity contribution
are made by its parent company. Costs from the Global Services
Agreement are charged to consolidated statement of operations or
capitalized as a component of Rigs under
construction, being directly attributable cost to the
construction, as applicable, and as a shareholders contribution
to capital.
Vivid Finance Limited: Under the consultancy
agreement effective from September 1, 2010 between the
Company and Vivid Finance Limited (Vivid), a related
party entity incorporated in Cyprus, Vivid provides the Company
with financing-related services such as (i) negotiating and
arranging new loan and credit facilities, interest rate swap
agreements, foreign currency contracts and forward exchange
contracts, (ii) renegotiating
F-37
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
existing loan facilities and other debt instruments and
(iii) the raising of equity or debt in the capital markets.
In exchange for its services, Vivid is entitled a fee equal to
0.20% on the total transaction amount. The consultancy agreement
has a term of five years and may be terminated (i) at the
end of its term unless extended by mutual agreement of the
parties; (ii) at any time by the mutual agreement of the
parties; and (iii) by the Company after providing written
notice to Vivid at least 30 days prior to the actual
termination date.
In the period from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011,
total charges from Vivid Finance were $4,240 and charged to
statement of operations and as a shareholders contribution to
capital.
Legal
services
Mr. Savvas D. Georghiades, a member of the Companys
board of directors, provides legal services to the Company
through his law firm, Savvas D. Georghiades, Law Office. In the
period January 1 to June 30, 2010 and January 1 to
June 30, 2011, the Company and the subsidiary Primelead
Limited paid a fee of Euro 33,149 and Euro 47,390
respectively for the legal services provided by
Mr. Georghiades.
Related
party transactions on the balance sheet
Dryships, makes a number of payments towards yard installments,
loan installments, loan interest and interest rate swap payments
on behalf of Ocean Rig UDW. The amount payable/receivable
to/from Dryships Inc. included in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010 amounted to $0. As of December 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2011, $0 and $0 were outstanding to Cardiff
respectively.
|
|
5.
|
Advances
for Rigs under Construction:
|
The amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets include milestone payments relating to the shipbuilding
contracts with the shipyards, supervision costs and any material
related expenses incurred during the construction periods, all
of which are capitalized in accordance with the accounting
policy discussed in Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year/period
|
|
$
|
1,178,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,888,490
|
|
Advances for drillships under construction and related costs
|
|
|
710,098
|
|
|
|
1,561,475
|
|
Drillships delivered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,745,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year/period
|
|
$
|
1,888,490
|
|
|
$
|
1,704,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 3, 2011 the Company took delivery of its
newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Corcovado, and the
final yard installment of $289,000 was paid.
On March 30, 2011 the Company took delivery of its
newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Olympia, and the
final yard installment of $288,400 was paid.
On April 18, 2011, April, 27 and June 23, 2011,
pursuant to the drillship master agreement (Note 7), the
Company exercised three of its four newbuilding drillship
options under its contract with Samsung Heavy Industries Co.,
Ltd. (Samsung), dated November 22, 2010 and
entered into shipbuilding contracts for three seventh generation
ultra-deepwater drillships namely NB#1, NB#2 and NB#3, for a
total yard cost of $608,000, per
F-38
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
drillship. The Company paid $622,413 to the shipyard in
connection with the exercise of these options. Delivery of these
hulls is scheduled for July 2013, September 2013 and November
2013, respectively.
On May 16, 2011, the Company entered into an addendum to
its option contract with Samsung, pursuant to which the Company
was granted the option for the construction of up to two
additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would be
sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia, the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the
Ocean Rig Mykonos and the seventh generation
ultra-deepwater drillships described above, with certain
upgrades to vessel design and specifications. Pursuant to the
addendum, the two additional newbuilding drillship options and
the remaining option under the original contract may be
exercised at any time on or prior to January 31, 2012.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the
Company also paid an amount of $156,061 to the yard for the
construction of the Ocean Rig Poseidon and the Ocean
Rig Mykonos.
|
|
6.
|
Drilling
Rigs, machinery and equipment:
|
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,440,118
|
|
|
|
(190,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,249,333
|
|
Additions/Transfer in from rigs under construction
|
|
|
1,755,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,755,634
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,910
|
)
|
|
|
(63,910
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
3,195,583
|
|
|
|
(254,695
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,940,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, all of the Companys drilling
rigs and drillships under construction have been pledged as
collateral to secure the bank loans (Note 7).
The amount of long-term debt shown in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets is analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Loan Facilities
|
|
$
|
1,285,357
|
|
|
$
|
1,669,643
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Less: Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(27,810
|
)
|
|
|
(47,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,257,547
|
|
|
|
2,122,537
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
$
|
560,561
|
|
|
$
|
231,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
696,986
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The principal payments, excluding deferred financing costs, to
be made during each of the twelve-month periods subsequent to
June 30, 2011 for the loan payments as classified in the
balance sheet, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
231,219
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
246,667
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
543,437
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
|
114,988
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
1,033,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
|
2,169,643
|
|
Less: Financing fees
|
|
|
(47,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
2,122,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Notes
On April 27, 2011, the Company issued $500.0 million
aggregate principal amount of its 9.5% senior unsecured
notes due 2016 (the Senior Notes) offered in a
private placement resulting in net proceeds of approximately
$487.5 million.
The total interest expense related to the Senior Notes in the
Companys unaudited interim condensed consolidated
statement of operations for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 was $8,313. The contractual semi-annual
coupon interest rate is 9.5% per year.
Credit
facilities
Please refer to Note 10 to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010
for a discussion of the Companys various credit facilities
and material loan covenants contained therein.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had two open credit
facilities, which are reduced in quarterly and semi-annual
installments or bullets. The aggregate available unused amounts
under these facilities, provided completion of definitive
documentation of the amended loan agreement for the Ocean Rig
Mykonos, as of June 30, 2011 were $717.4 million.
The Company is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee of
0.60% per annum of the unutilized portion of the line of credit.
Interest is payable at a rate based on LIBOR plus a margin. The
Company signed definitive documentation to amend this facility
on August 10, 2011.
On December 21, 2010, Drillship Hydra Owners Inc. entered
into a $325.0 million short-term loan facility with a
syndicate of lenders for the purpose of (i) meeting the
ongoing working capital needs of Drillships Hydra Owners Inc.;
(ii) financing the partial repayment of existing debt in
relation to the purchase of the Ocean Rig Corcovado; and
(iii) financing the payment of the final installment
associated with the purchase of said drillship. This loan
facility was repayable in full in June 2011 and bore interest at
a rate of LIBOR plus a margin. The Company drew down the full
amount of this loan on January 5, 2011 and repaid the full
amount of this loan on April 20, 2011 with borrowings under
the $800.0 million senior secured term loan agreement
discussed below.
On April 18, 2011, the Company entered into an
$800 million syndicated secured term loan facility to
partially finance the construction costs of the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia. This facility
has a five year term and is repayable in 20 quarterly
installments plus a balloon payment payable with the last
installment. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin.
The facility is guaranteed by DryShips and Ocean Rig UDW and
imposes certain financial covenants on both entities. On
April 20, 2011, the Company drew down the full amount of
this facility and prepaid the outstanding of balance its
existing $325 million Bridge Loan Facility.
F-40
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
On April 27, 2011, the Company entered into an amended
agreement with all lenders under the Two $562,000 Loan
Agreements to restructure the original agreements. The principal
terms of the restructuring are as follows: (i) the maximum
amount permitted to be drawn is reduced from $562.5 million
to $495.0 million under each facility; (ii) in
addition to the guarantee already provided by DryShips, the
Company provided an unlimited recourse guarantee that will
include certain financial covenants that will apply quarterly to
Ocean Rig UDW; (iii) the Company is permitted to draw under
the facility with respect to the Ocean Rig Poseidon based upon
the employment of the drillship under its drilling contract with
Petrobras Tanzania, and on April 27, 2011, the cash
collateral deposited for this vessel was released; and
(iv) the Company will be permitted to draw under the
facility with respect to the Ocean Rig Mykonos provided
it has obtained suitable employment for such drillship no later
than August 2011 at specified minimum dayrates and for specified
minimum terms,with charterers that are satisfactory to such
lenders. These minimum dayrates are above current dayrates
available in the market and the rates the Company received in
certain of the Companys latest contract awards. In the
event the Company is unable to secure suitable employment for
the Ocean Rig Mykonos by that date, the Company would be
required to repay all outstanding amounts under the agreement
with cash collateral held with the lenders. The Companys
lenders have agreed to amend the terms of the credit facility
based on the Petrobras Brazil contract to allow for full draw
downs to finance the remaining installment payments for the
Ocean Rig Mykonos and the release of the cash collateral
deposited for the drillship. The Company signed definitive
documentation to amend this facility on August 10, 2011.
Total interest and debt issuance amortization cost incurred on
long-term debt for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2011, amounted to $18,653 and $44,997, respectively, of
which $17,234 and $30,939 respectively, were capitalized as part
of the cost of the Drill Rigs under construction.
Total interest incurred on long-term debt, net of capitalized
interest, is included in Interest and finance costs
in the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated
statement of operations (Note 9).
The weighted-average interest rates on the above outstanding
loans and credit facilities for the applicable periods were
4.73% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 and
4.50% for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The outstanding loans above, except for the senior notes
discussed in section below, are secured by a first priority
mortgage over the drillships/drill rigs or assignment of
shipbuilding contracts, corporate guarantee, and a first
assignment of all freights, earnings, insurances and requisition
compensation. The loans contain covenants including
restrictions, without the banks prior consent, as to
changes in management and ownership of the vessels, additional
indebtedness and mortgaging of vessels, change in the general
nature of the Companys business, and maintaining an
established place of business in the United States or the United
Kingdom. The loans also contain certain financial covenants
relating to the Companys financial position and the
consolidated financial position of DryShips Inc., operating
performance and liquidity. A default situation in DryShips could
have a substantial effect on the Company. Should DryShips fail
to pay loan installments as they fall due, this would result in
a cross-default on the Companys facilities. As per
December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011 there was no
default situation in DryShips and therefore no cross-default for
the Companys loans.
The $500.0 million 9.5% senior unsecured notes due
2016 are unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of
payment to any of the Companys future subordinated
indebtedness and equally in right of payment to all of the
Companys existing and future unsecured senior
indebtedness. The notes will not be guaranteed by any of the
Companys subsidiaries. The Company may redeem some or all
of the notes as follows: (i) at any time and from time to
time from April 27, 2014 to April 26, 2015, at a
redemption price equal to 104.5% of the aggregate principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption; or (ii) at any time and from time to time from
April 27, 2015 at a redemption price equal to 102.5% of the
aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the date of redemption. Upon a change of control, which occurs
if 50% or more of the Companys shares
F-41
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
are acquired by any person or group other than DryShips or its
affiliates, the noteholders will have an option to require the
Company to purchase all outstanding notes at a redemption price
of 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of purchase. Subject to a number of
limitations and exceptions, the bond agreement governing the
notes contains covenants limiting, among other things, the
Companys ability to: (i) create liens; or
(ii) merge, or consolidate or transfer, sell or lease all
or substantially all of the Companys assets. Furthermore,
the bond agreement contains financial covenants requiring the
Company, among other things, to ensure that the Company
maintains: (i) a consolidated equity ratio of minimum 35%;
(ii) free cash of minimum $50 million;
(iii) current ratio of minimum 1-to-1; and (iv) an
interest coverage ratio of 2.5x calculated on a 12 month
rolling basis. As per June 30, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the bond agreement financial covenants.
|
|
8.
|
Financial
Instruments and Fair Value Measurements:
|
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding seven
interest rate swap (IRS), cap and floor agreements, with a
notional amount of $1.0 billion. All derivatives are
carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets at each
period end. Balances as of December 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2011, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Swaps
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Rate Swaps
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
$
|
1,092
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(12,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,503
|
)
|
|
|
(5,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,443
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(96,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,901
|
)
|
|
|
(87,953
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,953
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
(107,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,396
|
)
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
$
|
(92,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Derivatives Designated as
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(36,523
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Derivatives Designated as
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial Instruments current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments current liabilities
|
|
|
(12,503
|
)
|
|
|
(5,443
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial Instruments non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(60,378
|
)
|
|
|
(87,953
|
)
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
Financial instruments current assets
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
Financial instruments current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,881
|
)
|
|
|
(93,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
1,092
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
$
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the unaudited interim
condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period
|
|
|
Six-Month Period
|
|
Derivatives Designated for Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps unrealized gains/(losses)
|
|
$
|
(9,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(9,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No portion of the cash flow hedges shown above was ineffective
during 2010. Effective January 1, 2011 the Company removed
the designation of the cash flow hedges and discontinued hedge
accounting for the associated interest rate swaps.
During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011,
$0 and $3,479, respectively, of existing losses were transferred
from Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) to the statement of
operations. The estimated net amount of existing losses at
June 30, 2011 that will be reclassified to earnings within
the next twelve months is $14,061.
The effects of derivative instruments not designated or
qualifying as hedging instruments on the unaudited interim
condensed consolidated statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Six-Month Period
|
|
|
Six-Month Period
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Recognized
|
|
Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$
|
(3,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
(446
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(34,501
|
)
|
|
|
(18,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(37,819
|
)
|
|
|
(19,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging requires companies
to recognize all derivatives instruments as either assets or
liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial
position. Effective January 1, 2011 the Company removed the
designation of the cash flow hedges and discontinued hedge
accounting for the associated interest rate swaps.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on
the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge
ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment
of effectiveness are recognized in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations. Changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments that have not been designated as hedging instruments
are reported in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations.
The Company enters into interest rate swap transactions to
manage interest costs and risk associated with changing interest
rates with respect to its variable interest rate loans and
credit facilities. The Company enters into foreign currency
forward contracts in order to manage risks associated with
future hire rates and fluctuations in foreign currencies,
respectively.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash and trade accounts receivable reported in the consolidated
balance sheets approximate their respective fair values because
of the short term nature of these accounts. The fair value of
the interest rate swaps was determined using a discounted cash
flow method based on market-based LIBOR swap yield curves,
taking into account current interest rates and the
creditworthiness of both the financial instrument counterparty
and the Company. The fair value of foreign currency forward
contracts was based on the forward exchange rates.
The guidance for fair value measurements applies to all assets
and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair
value basis. This guidance enables the reader of the financial
statements to assess the inputs used to develop those
measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality
and reliability of the information used to determine fair
values. The statement requires that assets and liabilities
carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the
following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market- based inputs
or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not
corroborated by market data.
The following table summarizes the valuation of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
the valuation date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps-liability position
|
|
$
|
(93,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts-position
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(92,304
|
)
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
(93,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
9.
|
Interest
and Finance costs:
|
The amounts in the accompanying unaudited interim condensed
consolidated statements of operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt, incl amortization financing fee(*)
|
|
$
|
18,653
|
|
|
$
|
44,997
|
|
Amortization unrealized OCI hedge reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
(17,236
|
)
|
|
|
(30,939
|
)
|
Long-term debt commitment fees and Bank charges
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,738
|
|
|
$
|
22,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
In addition, realized losses on certain IRS associated with
capitalized interest on drillships under construction were
stored in OCI waiting to be reclassified into earnings together
with the depreciation of the vessels. The amounts recorded were
$0 and $11,178 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. |
Ocean Rig UDW operates through its various subsidiaries in a
number of countries throughout the world. Income taxes have been
provided based upon the tax laws and rates in the countries in
which operations are conducted and income is earned. The
countries in which Ocean Rig UDW operates have taxation regimes
with varying nominal rates or no system of corporate taxation,
as well differing deductions, credits and other tax attributes.
Consequently, there is not an expected relationship between the
provision for/or benefit from income taxes and income or loss
before income taxes.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
11.1 Legal
proceedings
Various claims, suits, and complaints, including those involving
government regulations and product liability, arise in the
ordinary course of the offshore drilling business.
The Company has obtained insurance for the assessed market value
of the rigs. However, such insurance coverage may not provide
sufficient funds to protect the Company from all liabilities
that could result from its operations in all situations. Risks
against which the Company may not be fully insured or insurable
for include environmental liabilities, which may result from a
blow-out or similar accident, or liabilities resulting from
reservoir damage alleged to have been caused by the negligence
of the Company.
The Companys loss of hire insurance coverage does not
protect against loss of income from day one, but will be
effective after 45 days off-hire. The occurrence of
casualty or loss, against which the Company is not fully
insured, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The insurance covers approximately one year with loss of hire.
As part of the Companys normal course of operations, the
Companys customer may disagree on amounts due to the
Company under the provision of the contracts which are normally
settled though negotiations with the customer. Disputed amounts
are normally reflected in revenues at such time as the Company
reaches an agreement with the customer on the amounts due.
Except for the matter discussed below, the Company is not a
party to any
F-45
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
material litigation where claims or counterclaims have been
filed against the Company other than routine legal proceedings
incidental to the Companys business.
Ocean Rigs Leiv Eiriksson operated in Angola in the period
2002 to 2007. Ocean Rig understands that the Angolan government
has retroactively levied import/export duties for two
importation events in the period 2002 to 2007. As Ocean Rig has
formally disputed all claims in relation to the potential
duties, no provision has been made. The maximum amount is
estimated to be between $5.0 and $10.0 million. The Company
believes that the assessment of duties is without merit and that
the Company will not be required to pay any material amount.
11.2
Contractual revenue
Future minimum contractual revenue, based on vessels and rigs
committed to long-term contracts as of June 30, 2011,
amount to $396.9 million during 2011, $720.1 million
during 2012, and $387.1 million during 2013.
11.3
Purchase obligations
As of June 30, 2011, the future obligations in relation to
the drillships under construction amounted to
$673.3 million for the next 12 months thereafter. As
of August 19, 2011, the Company made an aggregate of
$726.7 million of construction and construction-related
payments for the Companys seventh generation drillships
and have remaining total construction and construction-related
payments of approximately $1,186.9 million in the aggregate.
11.4
Rental payments
Ocean Rig entered into a five year office lease agreement with
Vestre Svanholmen 6 AS which commenced on July 1, 2007.
This lease includes an option for an additional five year term
which must be exercised at least six months prior to the end of
the term of the initial contract which expires in June 2012. As
of June 30, 2011, the future obligations amount to
$0.5 million for 2011 and $0.4 million for 2012.
|
|
12.
|
Total
Comprehensive Income:
|
The Total Comprehensive Income is analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
31,145
|
|
|
$
|
10,433
|
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(20,886
|
)
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Increase / (Decrease) in defined benefit plan adjustments
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
9,601
|
|
|
$
|
14,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 On July 20, 2011 the Company signed the
Ocean Rig Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Mykonos
drilling contract offshore Brazil with Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A (Petrobras). The term of each
contract is 1095 days, with a total combined value of
$1.1 billion.
13.2 On July 28, 2011 the Company took delivery of
its newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig
Poseidon, the third to be delivered of the four sister
drillships being constructed by Samsung. In connection with the
delivery of the Ocean Rig Poseidon, the final
yard installment of $309.3 million was paid, which was
financed with
F-46
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2011
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
additional drawdowns in July under the Companys credit
facility for the construction of the Ocean Rig
Poseidon, totaling $308.2 million.
13.3 On August 4, 2011, the board of directors of
DryShips announced that it approved the partial spin-off, or the
Spin Off, of its interest in Ocean Rig, of which it owned, as of
such date, approximately 78% of the issued and outstanding
common stock. DryShips will distribute approximately
2,967,359 shares of common stock of Ocean Rig to existing
shareholders, which will reduce DryShips ownership
interest in Ocean Rig by approximately 2%. The number of shares
of common stock of Ocean Rig to be distributed for each share of
common stock of DryShips will be determined by dividing
2,967,359 by the aggregate number of issued and outstanding
shares of common stock of DryShips on September 21, 2011,
the record date for the distribution. As of August 4, 2011,
DryShips had outstanding 399,151,783 common shares, which would
have resulted in the distribution of 0.007434 shares of
common stock of Ocean Rig for every one share of common stock of
DryShips. Ocean Rig has been advised that DryShips intends to
conduct the Spin Off in order to satisfy the initial listing
criteria of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, which require that
Ocean Rig have a minimum number of round lot shareholders
(shareholders who own 100 or more shares), and thereby increase
the liquidity of its shares of common stock. Ocean Rig believes
that listing its shares of common stock on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market and thereby increasing the liquidity of its shares
of common stock will benefit its shareholders by improving the
ability of its shareholders to monetize their investment by
selling its common shares, reduce volatility in the market price
of its common shares, enhance its ability to access the capital
markets and increase the likelihood of attracting coverage by
research analysts which, in turn, would provide additional
information to shareholders upon which to base an investment
decision. The Spin Off will not require any action on the part
of DryShips shareholders. In connection with the Spin Off,
Ocean Rig have applied to have its common shares listed for
trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market; however Ocean Rig
cannot assure you that the Spin Off will be completed or that
its common shares will be approved for listing on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.
13.4 On August 10, 2011, the Company amended the
terms of its $495.0 million credit facility for the
construction of the Ocean Rig Mykonos to allow for full
draw downs to finance the remaining installment payments for the
Ocean Rig Mykonos based on the Petrobras Brazil contract
and on August 10, 2011, the cash collateral deposited for
the drillship was released. The amendment also requires that the
Ocean Rig Mykonos be re-employed under a contract
acceptable to the lenders meeting certain minimum terms and
dayrates at least six months, in lieu of 12 months, prior
to the expiration of the Petrobras Brazil contract. All other
material terms of the credit facility were unchanged.
13.5 On August 26, 2011, the Company commenced an
offer to exchange up to 28,571,428 new common shares that have
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act), for an equivalent number of
common shares of Ocean Rig UDW, previously sold in a private
offering made in December 2010 to both
non-U.S. persons
in Norway in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities
Act and to qualified institutional buyers in the United States
in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act, pursuant
to a registration statement on
Form F-4
(File
No. 333-175940)
of Ocean Rig UDW filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Commission) on
August 1, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to
Form F-4
and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Form F-4
filed with the Commission on August 17, 2011 and
August 30, 2011, respectively.
F-47
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Ocean Rig UDW Inc. at December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2009 have been restated to correct
errors in the application of
ASC 835-20,
Capitalization of Interest and
ASC 815-30,
Cash Flow Hedges.
Ernst & Young AS
Stavanger, Norway
April 29, 2011
F-48
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except for
share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
234,195
|
|
|
$
|
95,707
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 6)
|
|
|
220,690
|
|
|
|
512,793
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
65,486
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
Due from related parties (Note 4)
|
|
|
4,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 11)
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
32,819
|
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
558,558
|
|
|
|
672,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS, NET:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rigs under construction (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,178,392
|
|
|
|
1,888,490
|
|
Drilling rigs, machinery and equipment, net (Note 8)
|
|
|
1,317,607
|
|
|
|
1,249,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets, net
|
|
|
2,495,999
|
|
|
|
3,137,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NON CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Intangible assets, net (Note 9)
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
Above market acquired time charter (Note 9)
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
Pensions (Note 12)
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets (Note 13)
|
|
|
40,700
|
|
|
|
472,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non current assets, net
|
|
|
55,428
|
|
|
|
533,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,109,985
|
|
|
$
|
4,343,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 10)
|
|
$
|
537,668
|
|
|
$
|
560,561
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
13,591
|
|
|
|
6,189
|
|
Due to related parties (Note 4)
|
|
|
48,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
34,235
|
|
|
|
45,631
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
38,400
|
|
|
|
40,205
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 11)
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
|
|
12,503
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
682,287
|
|
|
|
667,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, net of current portion (Note 10)
|
|
|
662,362
|
|
|
|
696,986
|
|
Financial instruments (Note 11)
|
|
|
64,219
|
|
|
|
96,901
|
|
Deferred tax liability (Note 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Pensions (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non current liabilities
|
|
|
726,581
|
|
|
|
794,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0,01 par value; 250,000,000 shares
authorized, 131,696,928 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2010 (Note 14)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
2,386,953
|
|
|
|
3,457,444
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensiveloss
|
|
|
(34,128
|
)
|
|
|
(60,722
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(651,718
|
)
|
|
|
(516,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,701,117
|
|
|
|
2,881,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,109,985
|
|
|
$
|
4,343,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-49
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the periods ended December 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except for
share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing revenues
|
|
$
|
116,859
|
|
|
$
|
223,774
|
|
|
$
|
141,211
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
85,251
|
|
|
|
149,751
|
|
|
|
261,951
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
16,553
|
|
|
|
14,597
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
218,663
|
|
|
|
388,122
|
|
|
|
405,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses (Note 16)
|
|
|
86,229
|
|
|
|
133,256
|
|
|
|
119,369
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 8 and 9)
|
|
|
45,432
|
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
75,092
|
|
Gain/(loss) of sale assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,458
|
)
|
Goodwill Impairment (Note 17)
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,462
|
|
|
|
17,955
|
|
|
|
19,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(689,189
|
)
|
|
|
161,563
|
|
|
|
190,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs (Note 18)
|
|
|
(71,692
|
)
|
|
|
(46,120
|
)
|
|
|
(8,418
|
)
|
Interest income (Note 19)
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
Other, net (Note 11)
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses/ income, net
|
|
|
(70,959
|
)
|
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
|
|
(35,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN LOSS OF
INVESTEE
|
|
|
(760,148
|
)
|
|
|
128,551
|
|
|
|
155,197
|
|
Income taxes (Note 20)
|
|
|
(2,844
|
)
|
|
|
(12,797
|
)
|
|
|
(20,436
|
)
|
Equity in loss of investee (Note 5.1)
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME/(LOSS)
|
|
|
(764,047
|
)
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non controlling interest
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME/(LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO OCEAN RIG UDW INC.
|
|
$
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per common share attributable to Ocean Rig
UDW inc., basic and diluted (Note 15)
|
|
|
(7.43
|
)
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, basic and
diluted
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
103,908,279
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Actuarial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Hedge
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
162,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,425
|
)
|
|
|
158,642
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
|
(765,847
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on cash flows hedges, net of tax of $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
(46,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,637
|
)
|
Increase in defined benefit plan adjustments, net of tax of $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
Option costs
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
Capital contribution from DryShips Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,164
|
|
Capital contribution due to retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,582
|
|
Capital contribution for subsidiary due to stock option program
employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
Retained earnings acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Redemption adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
(810,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,637
|
)
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
835,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,585
|
)
|
|
|
(767,472
|
)
|
|
|
23,631
|
|
Net income- As restated (Note 3)
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
Realized expense on Cash flow hedges, net of tax $0
(Note 20) - As restated(Note 3)
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on cash flows hedges, net of tax of $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
16,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,140
|
|
Increase in defined benefit plan adjustments, net of tax of $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Contribution of net assets in Drillships Investments
Inc.(Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,900
|
|
Cancellation of shares in relation to acquisition of Drillship
Holding (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,781,375
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Acquisition of Drillships Holdings Inc. (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,781,375
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
358,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,003
|
|
Capital contribution from DryShips Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
126,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,750
|
)
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2009 As restated
(Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,386,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,128
|
)
|
|
|
(651,718
|
)
|
|
|
1,701,117
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
Realized expense on Cash flow hedges, net of tax $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
(21,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,523
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on cash flows hedges, net of tax of $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
(5,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,495
|
)
|
Increase in defined benefit plan adjustments, net of tax of $0
(Note 20)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
Share dividend (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Placement (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,571,428
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
488,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488,301
|
|
Capital contribution from DryShips Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
108,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,768
|
)
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,696,928
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
3,457,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,722
|
)
|
|
|
(516,957
|
)
|
|
|
2,881,082
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
$
|
134,761
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
45,432
|
|
|
|
75,348
|
|
|
|
75,092
|
|
Loss from disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
Commitments fees on undrawn line of credit
|
|
|
6,188
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
6,375
|
|
Amortization and premium paid over withdrawn loans
|
|
|
14,062
|
|
|
|
10,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of fair value of acquired drilling contracts
|
|
|
(16,553
|
)
|
|
|
(14,597
|
)
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Payments for Cash flow hedge not included in expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
(21,523
|
)
|
Interest income on restricted cash related to drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
(6,205
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from associated companies
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
31,654
|
|
|
|
33,119
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,569
|
)
|
|
|
(23,626
|
)
|
|
|
41,200
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
|
(17,521
|
)
|
|
|
(4,863
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
(7,402
|
)
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
(26,797
|
)
|
|
|
48,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
(3,207
|
)
|
|
|
(1,988
|
)
|
Pension liability
|
|
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(869
|
)
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
26,732
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
Payment of margin call for derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,700
|
)
|
|
|
(37,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
21,119
|
|
|
|
211,075
|
|
|
|
221,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in Ocean Rig ASA, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(972,802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances for vessels under construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,832
|
)
|
|
|
(705,022
|
)
|
Down payment for vessels under construction and other
improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294,569
|
)
|
Drillship options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,024
|
)
|
Drilling rigs, equipment and other improvements
|
|
|
(16,584
|
)
|
|
|
(14,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,834
|
)
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(31,287
|
)
|
|
|
(185,565
|
)
|
|
|
(335,898
|
)
|
Cash from acquisition of drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,020,673
|
)
|
|
|
(146,779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,441,347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution by DryShips Inc
|
|
|
650,161
|
|
|
|
753,375
|
|
|
|
540,321
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of common shares of subsidiary
|
|
|
11,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488,301
|
|
Proceeds from long-term credit facility
|
|
|
2,050,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
8,250
|
|
Proceeds from short term credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Principal payments and repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,438,941
|
)
|
|
|
(650,000
|
)
|
|
|
(132,717
|
)
|
Principal payments and repayments of short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(355,052
|
)
|
|
|
(115,000
|
)
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(15,136
|
)
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
(8,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
1,257,390
|
|
|
|
(103,041
|
)
|
|
|
1,081,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
257,836
|
|
|
|
(38,745
|
)
|
|
|
(138,488
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
15,104
|
|
|
|
272,940
|
|
|
|
234,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
272,940
|
|
|
|
234,195
|
|
|
$
|
95,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year/period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of amount capitalized
|
|
|
23,103
|
|
|
|
51,093
|
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
13,233
|
|
|
|
19,803
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-52
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
1a.
|
Basis of
Presentation and General Information:
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Ocean Rig UDW Inc. and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company, Ocean Rig
UDW or Group). Ocean Rig UDW was formed under
the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on
December 10, 2007 under the name Primelead Shareholders
Inc. The Company was established by DryShips Inc. for the
purpose of being the holding company of its drilling rig
segment. Ocean Rig UDW Inc. acquired all of the outstanding
shares of Primelead Limited in December 2007 in a reverse
acquisition transaction under common control, which was
accounted for as a pooling of interests. As a result, the
consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations of Primelead Limited since the date of its inception
on November 16, 2007. In 2007, DryShips Inc. through its
subsidiary, Primelead Limited of Cyprus, purchased approximately
30% of the shares in Ocean Rig ASA which was accounted for as an
equity method investment. In 2008, the remainder of the shares
in Ocean Rig ASA were acquired and Ocean Rig ASA was delisted
from Oslo Stock Exchange. The transactions were accounted for as
a step acquisition under the purchase method of accounting and
the results of operations were consolidated subsequent to the
date control was achieved on May 14, 2008. On
November 24, 2010, Ocean Rig UDW established an office and
was registered with the Cyprus Registrar of Companies as an
overseas company.
The Company is controlled by DryShips Inc., a publicly listed
company on NASDAQ exchange listed under the symbol
DRYS.
Through Ocean Rig ASA, the predecessor of the Group, the Company
was organized in 1996, when Ocean Rig ASA ordered four Hulls.
The 5th generation drilling rigs Leiv Eiriksson and
Eirik Raude were delivered in 2001 and 2002, while two
remaining Hulls were sold. Ocean Rig UDW owned and operated as
of December 31, 2010 the two semi-submersible rigs that are
among the worlds largest drilling rigs, built for ultra
deep-waters and extreme weather conditions.
Further, the Group has acquired companies holding contracts for
four drillships which are currently under construction, two of
which were originally ordered in 2007 and the other two in 2008
(Note 5). Two drillships (Hulls 1837 and 1838) were
ordered by certain entities including entities affiliated with
the CEO of DryShips Inc, George Economou. Hulls 1865 and 1866,
were ordered by DryShips Inc. which subsequently contributed all
its equity interests in the companies holding these contracts to
Ocean Rig UDW on 5 March 2009. The Company acquired all of
the shares in Drillships Holding Inc., being the holding company
of the companies holding contracts for Hull Nos. 1837 and 1838,
on 15 May 2009. The two other drillships, Hull 1837, which
was named Ocean Rig Corcovado, was delivered on January 3,
2011. Hull 1838 which was named Ocean Rig Olympia was delivered
on March 30, 2011. The other Hulls are scheduled to be
delivered in 2011.
|
|
1b.
|
Liquidity
and Management Plans:
|
At December 31, 2010, the Companys short-term
contractual obligations to fund the construction installments
under the drillship shipbuilding contracts in 2011 amount to
$1,374 million. Cash expected to be generated from
operations is not anticipated to be sufficient to cover the
Companys capital commitments, current loan obligations and
maintain compliance with minimum cash balance covenants. In
April 2011, the Company entered into a $800.0 million
senior secured term loan agreement and drew down the full amount
of the loan. Furthermore, in April 2011, the Company entered
into definitive loan documentation that allows it to draw an
amount of $495.0 million to cover obligations falling due
within 2011. Finally, in April 2011, the Company completed the
issuance of $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
9.50% Senior Unsecured Bonds Due 2016. Additionally,
DryShips Inc. has committed to provide cash to meet the
Companys liquidity needs over the next twelve months. The
Company believes that the above financing and support from
Dryships Inc. will be sufficient to meet its working capital
needs, capital commitments (including two newbuilding drillship
options exercised in 2011
F-53
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
(see Note 23.10)), loan obligations and maintain compliance
with its minimum cash balance and other loan covenants
throughout 2011. In addition, should the Company exercise its
options to construct two new drillships, the Company would
expect to be required to pay additional cash payments of
approximately $415 million in 2011, for which it would be
dependent upon obtaining additional financing. However, should
such financing and support from DryShips not be available when
required due to unexpected events, this could severely impact
the Companys ability to satisfy future liquidity
requirements and its ability to finance future operations.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting policies:
|
(a) Principles
of Consolidation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America (US GAAP)
and include the accounts and operating results of Ocean Rig UDW
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(b) Equity
method investments:
Investments in entities that the Company does not control, but
has the ability to exercise significant influence over the
operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the
equity method.
(c) Business
Combinations:
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance
(guidance) related to business combinations, the
purchase price of acquired businesses is allocated to tangible
and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their respective fair values. The excess of the
purchase price over the respective fair value of net assets
acquired is recorded as goodwill. Incremental costs incurred in
relation to a business combination were capitalized until the
adoption of the new guidance for business combinations on
January 1, 2009 that requires all costs related to business
combinations to be expensed. However, associated costs to obtain
related debt financing are an element of the effective interest
cost of the debt. Therefore they are capitalized and amortized
over the term of the related debt an included as interest
expense using the effective interest method.
(d) Use
of Estimates:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(e) Current
and non-current classification:
Assets and liabilities are classified as current assets and
current liabilities, respectively, if their maturity is within
one year of the balance sheet date. Otherwise, they are
classified as non-current assets and non-current liabilities.
(f) Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
The Company considers highly liquid investments such as time
deposits and certificates of deposit with an original maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
F-54
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
(g) Restricted
Cash:
Restricted cash may include (i) retention accounts which
can only be used to fund the loan installments coming due;
(ii) minimum liquidity collateral requirements under the
loan facilities; (iii) taxes withheld from employees and
deposited in designated bank accounts; and (iv) amounts
pledged as collateral for bank guarantees to suppliers; and
(v) amounts pledged as collateral for credit facilities.
Restricted cash balances include minimum required cash deposits,
as defined in the loan agreements, and are classified as of
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 as either current or
non-current depending on the individual deposit (note 6).
(h) Trade
Accounts Receivable:
The amount shown as trade accounts receivable at each balance
sheet date includes receivables from charterers for hire of
drilling rigs and related billings, net of a provision for
doubtful accounts. At each balance sheet date, all potentially
uncollectible accounts are assessed individually for purposes of
determining the appropriate provision for doubtful accounts.
There were no provisions for doubtful accounts at
December 31, 2009 or 2010.
(i) Related
parties:
Parties are related if one party has the ability, directly or
indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant
influence over the other party in making financial and operating
decisions. Parties are also related if they are subject to
common control or common significant influence. Related parties
also include members of the Companys or its parent
companys management or owners and their immediate families
(Note 4).
(j) Derivatives:
The Companys derivatives include interest rate swaps and
foreign currency forward contracts. The guidance on accounting
for certain derivative instruments and certain hedging
activities requires all derivative instruments to be recorded on
the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at
its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
(i) Hedge
Accounting:
At the inception of a hedge relationship, the Company formally
designates and documents the hedge relationship to which the
Company wishes to apply hedge accounting and the risk management
objective and strategy undertaken for the hedge. The
documentation includes identification of the hedging instrument,
hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged
and how the entity will assess the hedging instruments
effectiveness in offsetting exposure to changes in the hedged
items cash flows attributable to the hedged risk. Such
hedges are expected to be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in cash flows and are assessed on an ongoing
basis to determine whether they actually have been highly
effective throughout the financial reporting periods for which
they were designated.
The Company is party to interest swap agreements where it
receives a floating interest rate and pays a fixed interest rate
for a certain period in exchange. Certain contracts which meet
the criteria for hedge accounting are accounted for as cash flow
hedges.
A cash flow hedge is a hedge of the exposure to variability in
cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated
with a recognized asset or liability, or a highly probable
forecasted transaction that could affect profit or loss.
F-55
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The effective portion of the gain or loss on the fair value of
the hedging instrument is recognized directly as a component of
Other comprehensive income in equity, while any ineffective
portion is recognized, immediately, in current period earnings.
The Company discontinues cash flow hedge accounting if the
hedging instrument expires and it no longer meets the criteria
for hedge accounting or designation is revoked by the Company.
At that time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging
instrument recognized in equity is kept in equity until the
forecasted transaction occurs. When the forecasted transaction
occurs, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument is
recognized in profit or loss. If a hedged transaction is no
longer expected to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss
recognized in equity is transferred to net profit or loss for
the year as financial income or expense.
(ii) Other
Derivatives:
Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that have
not been designated as hedging instruments are reported in
current period earnings under Gain/(loss) on interest rate
swaps and Other net.
(k) Guidance
Fair Value Measurements:
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the guidance
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. In
addition, on January 1, 2008, the Company made no election
to account for its monetary assets and liabilities at fair
values as allowed by FASB guidance for financial instruments
(Note 11).
(l) Concentration
of Credit Risk:
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally
of cash and cash equivalents; trade accounts receivable and
derivative contracts (interest rate swaps and foreign currency
contracts. The maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is
the book value at the balance sheet date. The Company places its
cash and cash equivalents, consisting mostly of deposits, with
qualified financial institutions. The Company performs periodic
evaluations of the relative credit standing of those financial
institutions. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event
of non-performance by counter parties to derivative instruments;
however, the Company limits its exposure by diversifying among
counter parties. The Companys customers are mainly major
oil companies. The credit risk has therefore determined by the
Company to be low. When considered necessary, additional
arrangements are put in place to minimize credit risk, such as
letters of credit or other forms of payment guarantees. The
Company limits its credit risk with trade accounts receivable by
performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers
financial condition and generally does not require collateral
for its trade accounts receivable. The Company has made
drillships prepayments to Samsung Heavy Industries. The
ownership of the drillships is transferred from the yard to the
Company at delivery. The credit risk of the prepayments is to a
large extent reduced through refund guarantees by highly rated
banks.
As of December 31, 2010, cumulative installment payments
made to Samsung Heavy Industries amounts to approximately
$1,512,655 for the four units contracted. These installment
payments are, to a large extent, secured with irrevocable
letters of guarantee, covering pre-delivery installments if the
contract is rescinded in accordance with the terms of the
contract. The irrevocable letters of guarantee are issued by
high quality banks.
The coverage ratios (letter of credit to total Samsung payments)
as per December 31, 2010, are 95%, 94% and 94% for Hulls
1838, 1865 and 1866, respectively. As a result, the open risk is
$19,000 for Hull 1838 and $30,000 for the Hulls 1865 and 1866.
The open risk (prepayments less letters of guarantee) is
considered to be within acceptable levels given Samsung Heavy
Industries financial position and position as key company
for South Korea. The drillships, while under construction, will
be insured by Samsung Heavy Industries from the time of the
keel-laying until delivery.
F-56
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
(m) Rigs
under construction:
This represents amounts expended by the Company in accordance
with the terms of the construction contracts for drillships as
well as expenses incurred directly or under a management
agreement with a related party in connection with on sight
supervision. In addition, interest costs incurred during the
construction (until the asset is substantially complete and
ready for its intended use) are capitalized. The carrying value
of rigs under construction (Newbuildings) represents
the accumulated costs at the balance sheet date. Cost components
include payments for yard installments and variation orders,
commissions to related party, construction supervision,
equipment, spare parts, capitalized interest, costs related to
first time mobilization and commissioning costs. No charge for
depreciation is made until commissioning of the newbuilding has
been completed and it is ready for its intended use.
(n) Capitalized
interest:
Interest expenses are capitalized during construction of rigs
under construction based on accumulated expenditures for the
applicable project at the Companys current rate of
borrowing. The amount of interest expense capitalized in an
accounting period is determined by applying an interest rate
(the capitalization rate) to the average amount of
accumulated expenditures for the asset during the period. The
capitalization rates used in an accounting period are based on
the rates applicable to borrowings outstanding during the
period. The Company does not capitalize amounts beyond the
actual interest expense incurred in the period.
If the Companys financing plans associate a specific new
borrowing with a qualifying asset, the Company uses the rate on
that borrowing as the capitalization rate to be applied to that
portion of the average accumulated expenditures for the asset
that does not exceed the amount of that borrowing. If average
accumulated expenditures for the asset exceed the amounts of
specific new borrowings associated with the asset, the
capitalization rate applied to such excess is a weighted average
of the rates applicable to other borrowings of the Company.
(o) Drilling
Rigs machinery and equipment, Net:
(i) Drilling rigs are stated at historical cost less
accumulated depreciation. Such costs include the cost of adding
or replacing parts of drilling rig machinery and equipment when
that cost is incurred, if the recognition criteria are met. The
recognition criteria require that the cost incurred extends the
useful life of a drilling rig. The carrying amounts of those
parts that are replaced are written off and the cost of the new
parts is capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-
line basis over the useful life of the assets as follows: bare
deck 30 years and other asset parts 5 to 15 years.
(ii) Drilling rig machinery and equipment, IT and
office equipment, are recorded at cost and are depreciated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, for
Drilling rig machinery and equipment over 5-15 years and
for IT and office equipment over 5 years.
(p) Goodwill
and Intangible assets:
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair value of net assets acquired in a business
combination. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever events
or circumstances indicate possible impairment. The Company tests
goodwill for impairment annually. Goodwill is not amortized. The
Company has no other intangible assets with an indefinite life.
The Company tests for impairment each year on December 31.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment by first comparing the
carrying value of the reporting unit, which is defined as an
operating segment or a component of an operating segment that
constitutes a business for which
F-57
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
financial information is available and is regularly reviewed by
management, to its fair value. The Company estimates the fair
value of the reporting unit by weighting the combination of
generally accepted valuation methodologies, including both
income and market approaches.
For the income approach, the Company applies undiscounted
projected cash flows. To develop the projected net cash flows
from the Companys reporting unit, which are based on
estimated future utilization, day rates, projected demand for
its services, and rig availability, the Company considers key
factors that include assumptions regarding future commodity
prices, credit market uncertainties and the effect these factors
may have on the Companys contract drilling operations and
the capital expenditure budgets of its customers.
For the market approach, the Company derives publicly traded
company multiples from companies with operations similar to the
Companys reporting unit by using information publicly
disclosed by other publicly traded companies and, when
available, analyses of recent acquisitions in the marketplace.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying
value, no further testing is required. This is referred to as
Step 1. If the fair value is determined to be less than the
carrying value, a second step, Step 2, is performed to compute
the amount of the impairment, if any. In this process, an
implied fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on
the fair value of the operations, and is compared to its
carrying value. The shortfall of the implied fair value of
goodwill below its carrying value represents the amount of
goodwill impairment.
All of the Companys goodwill was impaired for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (Note 17).
The Companys finite-lived acquired intangible assets are
recorded at historical cost less accumulated amortization.
Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives of the intangibles as follows:
|
|
|
Intangible Assets/Liabilities
|
|
Years
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
10
|
Software
|
|
10
|
Fair value of above/below market acquired time charters
|
|
Over remaining contract term
|
Tradenames and software constitute the item Intangible
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
amortization of these items are included in the line
Depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
(q) Impairment
of Long-lived assets:
The Company reviews for impairment long-lived assets and
intangible long-lived assets held and used whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the assets may not be recoverable. In this respect, the Company
reviews its assets for impairment on a rig by rig and asset by
asset basis. When the estimate of undiscounted cash flows,
excluding interest charges, expected to be generated by the use
of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company
evaluates the asset for impairment loss. The impairment loss is
determined by the difference between the carrying amount of the
asset and the fair value of the asset.
As at December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Company performed an
impairment review of the Companys long-lived assets due to
the global economic downturn, the significant decline in
drilling rates in the rig industry and the outlook of the oil
services industry. The Company compared undiscounted cash flows
with the carrying values of the Companys long-lived assets
to determine if the assets were impaired. In developing
estimates of future cash flows, the Company relied upon
assumptions made by management with regard to the Companys
rigs, including future drilling rates, utilization rates,
operating expenses, future dry docking costs and the estimated
remaining
F-58
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
useful lives of the rigs. These assumptions are based on
historical trends as well as future expectations in line with
the Companys historical performance and the Companys
expectations for future fleet utilization under its current
fleet deployment strategy, and are consistent with the plans and
forecasts used by management to conduct its business. The
variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions,
including uncertainty about future events and general economic
conditions; therefore, the Companys accounting estimates
might change from period to period. As a result of the
impairment review, the Company determined that the carrying
amounts of its assets held for use were recoverable, and
therefore, concluded that no impairment loss was necessary for
2009 and 2010.
(r) Fair
value of above/below market acquired time charter:
In a business combination, the Company identifies assets
acquired or liabilities assumed and records all such identified
assets or liabilities at fair value. Favorable or unfavorable
drilling contracts exist when there is a difference between the
contracted dayrate and the dayrates prevailing at the
acquisition date. The amount to be recorded as an asset or
liability at the acquisition date is based on the difference
between the then-current fair values of a charter with similar
characteristics as the time charter assumed and the net present
value of future contractual cash flows from the time charter
contract assumed. When the present value of the time charter
assumed is greater than the then-current fair value of such
charter, the difference is recorded as Fair value of above
market acquired time charter. When the opposite situation
occurs, the difference is recorded as Fair value of
below-market acquired time charter. Such assets and
liabilities are amortized as a reduction of or an increase in
Other revenue, over the period of the time charter
assumed.
(s) Deferred
financing costs:
Deferred financing costs include fees, commissions and legal
expenses associated with the Companys long- term debt and
are capitalized and recorded net with the underlying debt. These
costs are amortized over the life of the related debt using the
effective interest method and are included in interest expense.
Unamortized fees relating to loans repaid or refinanced as debt
extinguishments are expensed as interest and finance costs in
the period the repayment or extinguishment is made.
(t) Pension
and retirement benefit obligation:
For employees, the Company has five retirement benefit plans,
which are managed and funded through Norwegian life insurance
companies. The projected benefit obligations are calculated
based on projected unit credit method and compared with the fair
value of pension assets.
Because a significant portion of the pension liability will not
be paid until well into the future, numerous assumptions have to
be made when estimating the pension liability at the balance
sheet date. The assumption may be split into two categories;
actuarial assumptions and financial assumptions. The actuarial
assumptions are unbiased, mutually compatible and represent the
Companys best estimates of the variables. The financial
assumptions are based on market expectations at the balance
sheet date, for the period over which the obligations are to be
settled. Due to the long-term nature of the pension obligations,
they are discounted to present value.
The funded status or net amount of the projected benefit
obligation and pension asset (net pension liability or net
pension asset) of each of its defined benefit plans, is recorded
in the balance sheet under the captions Non-current
liabilities and Non-current assets with an
offsetting amount in Accumulated other comprehensive
income for any amounts of actuary gains of losses or prior
service cost that has not been amortized to income.
F-59
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Net pension costs (benefit earned during the period including
interest on the projected benefit obligation, less estimated
return on pension assets and amortization of accumulated changes
in estimates) are included in General and administrative
expenses (administration employees) and Rig
operating expenses (rig employees).
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized as income or expense
when the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses
for each individual plan at the end of the previous reporting
year exceed 10% of the higher of the present value of the
defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at
that date. These gains and losses are recognized over the
expected average remaining working lives of the employees
participating in the plans.
(u) Provisions:
A provision is recognized in the balance sheet when the Company
has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a
past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic
benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a
reliable estimate of the amount can be made.
(v) Revenue
and Related Expenses:
Revenues: The Companys services and
deliverables are generally sold based upon contracts with its
customers that include fixed or determinable prices. The Company
recognizes revenue when delivery occurs, as directed by its
customer, or the customer assumes control of physical use of the
asset and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company
evaluates if there are multiple deliverables within its
contracts and whether the agreement conveys the right to use the
drill rigs for a stated period of time and meet the criteria for
lease accounting, in addition to providing a drilling services
element, which are generally compensated for by day rates. In
connection with drilling contracts, the Company may also receive
revenues for preparation and mobilization of equipment and
personnel or for capital improvements to the drilling rigs and
day rates or fixed price non-contingent demobilization fees.
Revenues are recorded net of agents commissions which may
range from one to three percent of gross revenues. There are two
types of drilling contracts: well contracts and term contracts.
Well contracts: Well contracts are contracts
under which the assignment is to drill a certain number of
wells. Revenue from dayrate based compensation for drilling
operations is recognized in the period during which the services
are rendered at the rates established in the contracts. All
mobilization revenues, direct incremental expenses of
mobilization and contributions from customers for capital
improvements are initially deferred and recognized as revenues
over the estimated duration of the drilling period. To the
extent that expenses exceed revenue to be recognized, they are
expensed as incurred. Contingent demobilization revenues are
recognized as the amounts become known over the demobilization
period. Non-contingent demobilization revenues are recognized
over the estimated duration of the drilling period. All costs of
demobilization are expensed as incurred. All revenues for well
contracts are recognized as Service revenues in the
statement of operations.
Term contracts: Term Contracts are contracts
under which the assignment is to operate the unit for a
specified period of time. For these types of contracts the
Company determines whether the arrangement is a multiple element
arrangement containing both a lease element and drilling
services element. For revenues derived from contracts that
contain a lease, the lease elements are recognized as
Leasing revenues in the statement of operations on a
basis approximating straight line over the lease period. The
drilling services element is recognized as Service
revenues in the period in which the services are rendered
at estimated fair value. Revenues related to the drilling
element of mobilization and direct incremental expenses of
drilling services are deferred and recognized over the estimated
duration of the drilling period. To the extent that expenses
exceed revenue to be recognized, they are expensed as incurred.
Contingent demobilization fees are recognized as the amounts
become known over the demobilization period. Non-contingent
demobilization revenues for the drilling services element are
recognized
F-60
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
over the estimated duration of the drilling period. All costs of
demobilization are expensed as incurred. Contributions from
customers for capital improvements are initially deferred and
recognized as revenues over the estimated duration of the
drilling contract.
See (r) Fair value of above/ below market acquired time
charter, for an explanation of Other
revenues.
(w) Class
costs:
The Company follows the direct expense method of accounting for
periodic class costs incurred during special surveys of drilling
rigs, normally every five years. Class costs and other
maintenance costs are expensed in the period incurred and
included in drilling rigs operating expenses.
(x) Foreign
Currency Translation:
The functional currency of the Company is the U.S. Dollar
since the Company operates in international drilling markets,
and therefore primarily transacts business in U.S. Dollars.
The Companys accounting records are maintained in
U.S. Dollars. Transactions involving other currencies
during the year are converted into U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. At the
balance sheet dates, monetary assets and liabilities, which are
denominated in other currencies, are translated into
U.S. Dollars at the year-end exchange rates. Resulting
gains or losses are included in General and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
(y) Income
Taxes:
Income taxes have been provided for based upon the tax laws and
rates in effect in the countries in which the Companys
operations are conducted and income is earned. There is no
expected relationship between the provision for/or benefit from
income taxes and income or loss before income taxes because the
countries in which the Company operates have taxation regimes
that vary not only with respect to the nominal rate, but also in
terms of the availability of deductions, credits and other
benefits. Variations also arise because income earned and taxed
in any particular country or countries may fluctuate from year
to year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences
between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of the
Company assets and liabilities using the applicable
jurisdictional tax rates in effect at the year end. A valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more
likely than not that some or all of the benefit from the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company accrues
interest and penalties related to its liabilities for
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
(z) Earnings/(loss)
per common share:
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated
by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
year. Diluted EPS reflect the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock
were exercised. Dilution has been computed using the treasury
stock method.
(aa) Other
comprehensive income/(loss):
The Company records certain transactions directly as
Comprehensive income/(loss) which is shown as a
separate component of Stockholders equity.
(ab) Business
segment:
Offshore drilling operations represent the Companys only
segment.
F-61
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
(ac) Recent
accounting pronouncements:
In September 2009, clarifying guidance was issued on
multiple-element revenue arrangements. The revised guidance
primarily provides two significant changes: 1) eliminates
the need for objective and reliable evidence of the fair value
for the undelivered element in order for a delivered item to be
treated as a separate unit of accounting, and 2) eliminates
the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration.
In addition, the guidance also expands the disclosure
requirements for revenue recognition. The new guidance will be
effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted provided
that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the
beginning of the year of adoption. The Company is currently
assessing the future impact of this new accounting pronouncement
to its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-01,
Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of
Stock and Cash which amends FASB ASC 505, Equity in order
to clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to
shareholders that allows the shareholder to elect to receive
cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of
cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate
is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per
share prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of
applying FASB ASC 505, Equity and FASB ASC 260, The Company
has not been involved in any such distributions and thus, the
impact to the Company cannot be determined until any such
distribution occurs.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)-Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU
2010-06
amends ASC 820 to add new requirements for disclosures
about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies
existing fair value disclosures about the level of
disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. The ASU also amends guidance on
employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan
assets under ASC 715 to require that disclosures be
provided by classes of assets instead of by major categories of
assets. The guidance in the ASU was effective for the first
reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide
the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance
did not have any impact on its financial position and results of
operation, but the required note disclosures have been included
in the financials.
|
|
3.
|
Restatement
of Previously Issued Financial Statements:
|
The Company restated its previously reported consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
to reflect the correction of an error in computing capitalized
interest expense for rigs under construction. Management
concluded that the amortization of and the deferred financing
cost should have been included in the capitalized rate affecting
the capitalization of interest.
Additionally, the Company considered
ASC 835-20,
Capitalization of Interest, and
ASC 815-30,Cash
Flow Hedges, and restated its previously reported financial
statements for 2009 to reflect the correction of an error to
reverse the reclassification into earnings of that portion of
interest that should have remained in accumulated other
comprehensive loss since it related to cash flow hedges of the
variability of interest on borrowings that was capitalized as
part of rigs under construction. Such accumulated other
comprehensive loss should be reclassified into earnings in the
same periods during which the hedged transactions affect
earnings.
The Companys management determined that the Interest and
finance costs were overstated by $11,189, rigs under
construction were understated by $6,253, accumulated other
comprehensive loss was understated by $4,936 and retained
earnings was understated by $11,189.
F-62
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The following tables reflect the impacts on the financial
statement line items of the accounting adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Errors
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
$
|
(57,309
|
)
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
|
$
|
(46,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit attributable to Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
|
|
|
104,565
|
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Errors
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rigs under construction
|
|
$
|
1,173,456
|
|
|
|
4,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,178,392
|
|
Total Fixed Assets, net
|
|
|
2,491,063
|
|
|
|
4,936
|
|
|
|
2,495,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,105,049
|
|
|
|
4,936
|
|
|
|
3,109,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(27,875
|
)
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
(34,128
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(662,907
|
)
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
|
|
(651,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,696,181
|
|
|
|
4,936
|
|
|
|
1,701,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,105,049
|
|
|
|
4,936
|
|
|
|
3,109,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Errors
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Consolidated Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
104,565
|
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
|
$
|
115,754
|
|
Interest income on restricted cash related to drillships(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
Payments for Cash flow hedge not included in expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
209,976
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
211,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances for vessels under construction
|
|
|
(125,896
|
)
|
|
|
(4,936
|
)
|
|
|
(130,832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash *)
|
|
|
(189,403
|
)
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
(185,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(145,681
|
)
|
|
|
(1,099
|
)
|
|
|
(146,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(38,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(38,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Interest income on restricted cash related to drillships has
been reclassified from Increase in restricted cash, as included
in the section Net Cash Used in Investing Activities, to
Interest income on restricted cash related to drillships, as
included in Net Cash provided by Operating Activities. |
F-63
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
4.
|
Transactions
with Related Parties:
|
Purchase
of Ocean Rig ASA shares from a Related Party in 2007 and
2008
On December 20, 2007, for consideration of $406,024, the
Company acquired 51,778,647 shares in Ocean Rig ASA from
Cardiff Marine Inc.(5). This represented 30.4% of the issued
shares in Ocean Rig ASA. A commission was paid to Cardiff
amounting to $4,050. The above commission was paid on
February 1, 2008. The commission was expensed and presented
as part of Interest and finance costs in 2007.
In April 2008, 7,546,668 shares, representing 4.4% of the
share capital of Ocean Rig ASA were purchased from companies
controlled by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
DryShips Inc for a consideration of $66,800, which is the
U.S. dollar equivalent NOK 45 per share, which is the price
that was offered to all shareholders in a mandatory offering.
In addition, a commission was paid to Cardiff amounting to
$9,900 for services rendered in relation to the acquisition of
the remaining shares in 2008 of Ocean Rig ASA. This commission
was paid on December 5, 2008 and was expensed and presented
as part of Interest and finance costs in 2008.
Acquisition
of Drillship Hulls 1837 and 1838
On October 3, 2008, the Company entered into a share
purchase agreement with certain unrelated parties and certain
entities affiliated with the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of DryShips Inc. to acquire the new build contracts for
the drillship Hulls 1837 and 1838, which were under
construction, and the associated debt, included in Drillships
Holdings Inc. (Drillships Holdings) (Note 1).
On May 15, 2009, the transaction closed. Since the
investment did not meet the definition of a business, it was
accounted for as a net asset acquisition on the closing date. As
consideration for this asset acquisition, Ocean Rig UDW
cancelled 25% of the shares held by DryShips Inc. as of
May 15, 2009 and simultaneously reissued the same number of
shares to the sellers. Consequently, following this transaction
the sellers held shares equal to 25% of the Companys total
issued and outstanding common shares. The value of the shares
issued was determined based on the fair value of the net assets
acquired of $358,000 and was recorded as an increase in the paid
in capital in stockholders equity. The fair values of
individual assets and liabilities acquired by the Company were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Contracts for construction of drillship Hulls 1837 and 1838
|
|
$
|
625,400
|
|
Cash deposits
|
|
|
200
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
(259,900
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(7,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
358,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Drillships Hulls 1865 and 1866
On March 5, 2009, DryShips Inc. contributed to the Company
the new build contracts for the drillship Hulls 1865 and 1866
under construction and other associated assets and debt included
in Drillships Investments Inc. Since the transfer did not meet
the definition of a business, it was not an exchange of a
business under common control. Therefore, it was accounted for
prospectively as a net asset acquisition under common control
and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at
the historical cost of DryShips Inc. in the period in which the
transfer occurred. The contribution of shares is recorded as an
increase in paid in capital in stockholders equity at the
historical cost of net assets of $439,900.
F-64
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The carryover basis of individual assets and liabilities
received by the Company were the construction contracts for
Hulls 1865 and 1866 at an aggregate of $422,100, cash deposits
of $183,500, other receivables of $40,700, intercompany
receivables of $1,300, bank borrowings of $161,900, other
liabilities of $100 and financial instruments with a negative
fair value of $45,700.
Management
Agreements with Cardiff Marine Inc. (Cardiff) and Vivid Finance
Ltd.
Cardiff engages primarily in the management of ocean-going
vessels, including but not limited to vessels owned by DryShips
Inc. Cardiff is beneficially majority-owned by the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of DryShips, Mr. George Economou.
In addition, Cardiff has management agreements in place with the
Company relating to Hulls 1837 and 1838 for a management fee of
$40 per month per hull.
The management agreements also provide for: (i) chartering
commission of 1.25% on the revenue earned; (ii) a
commission of 1.00% on all gross shipyards payments or sale
proceeds for drillships; (iii) a commission of 1% on loan
financing or refinancing; and (iv) a commission of 2% on
insurance premiums. The management agreements were terminated
effective December 21, 2010 and replaced by Vivid Finance
and Global service agreements; however all obligations to pay
for services rendered by Cardiff prior to termination remain in
full effect, which amounted to $5.8 million as of
December 31, 2010 and is due and payable in 2011. During
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, total
charges from Cardiff under the management agreements amounted to
$0.0 million, $1.9 million and $4.0 million,
respectively. This was capitalized as drillship under
construction cost, being a cost directly attributable to the
construction of the two drillships, the Ocean Rig Corcovado
and the Ocean Rig Olympia.
Under this agreement Vivid Finance Ltd, a company controlled by
the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. George Economou, provides consultancy services on
financing matters for DryShips and its affiliates, subsidiaries
or holding companies, including the Company, as directed by
DryShips. Under this agreement, Vivid Finance provides
consulting services relating to (i) the identification,
sourcing, negotiation and arrangement of new loan and credit
facilities, interest swap agreements, foreign currency contracts
and forward exchange contracts; (ii) the raising of equity
or debt in the public capital markets; and (iii) the
renegotiation of existing loan facilities and other debt
instruments. In consideration for these services, Vivid Finance
is entitled to a fee of twenty basis points, or 0.20%, on the
total transaction amount. The Company does not pay for services
provided in accordance with this agreement. DryShips Inc. pays
for the services. Accordingly, these expenses are recorded in
the consolidated statement of operations (or as otherwise
required by US GAAP) and as a shareholders contribution to
capital (additional paid-in capital).
Under the Global Services Agreement with DryShips, Cardiff, a
company controlled by Mr. George Economou, or its
subcontractor, will (i) provide consulting services related
to identifying, sourcing, negotiating and arranging new
employment for offshore assets of DryShips and its subsidiaries,
including our drilling units; and (ii) identify, source,
negotiate and arrange the sale or purchase of the offshore
assets of DryShips and its subsidiaries, including our drilling
units. In consideration of such services, DryShips will pay
Cardiff a fee of 1.0% in connection with employment arrangements
and 0.75% in connection with sale and purchase activities. The
Company does not pay for services provided in accordance with
this agreement, these expenses will however be recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations and as a shareholders
contribution to capital (additional paid-in capital).
In the period from acquisition of Hulls 1837 and 1838 on
May 15, 2009 to December 31, 2009, and January 1 to
December 31, 2010 total charges from Cardiff under the
management agreements amounted to $1,868 and $3,983
respectively. Costs from management service agreements are
capitalized as a component of Rigs under
F-65
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
construction, being directly attributable cost to the
construction. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, no balances
were outstanding to Cardiff.
In the period from September 1, 2010 to
December 31,2010, total charges from Vivid Finance was
$1,000 and charged to equity (additional paid-in capital) in
relation to the private placement as cost directly attributable
to the offering and reflected as an increase in shareholder
contribution to capital, see note 14.
Private
offering
A company controlled by our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. George Economou, purchased 2,869,428
common shares, or 2.38% of our outstanding common shares, in the
private offering that was completed on December 21, 2010.
The offering price was $17.50 per share. The price per share
paid was the same as that paid by other investors taking part in
the private offering. See note 14.
Purchase
of drillship options from DryShips
On November 22, 2010, DryShips entered into an option
contract with Samsung for the construction of up to four
ultra-deepwater drillships. The new orders would be
sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the Ocean
Rig Olympia and the two drillships under construction and would
have the same specifications as the Ocean Rig Poseidon. Each of
the four options to build a drillship may be exercised on or
prior to November 22, 2011 with vessel deliveries ranging
from 2013 until 2014 depending on when the options are
exercised. The total construction cost, excluding financing
costs, is estimated to be about $600 million per drillship.
The agreement includes a non-refundable slot reservation fee of
$24.8 million per drillship, which was paid by DryShips,
which will be applied towards the drillship contract price if
the options are exercised. This agreement was novated to the
Company by DryShips on December 30, 2010 at a cost of
$99.0 million. In addition, the Company paid deposits
totaling $20.0 million to Samsung in the first quarter of
2011 to maintain favorable costs and yard slot timing under the
option contract.
Legal
services
Mr. Savvas D. Georghiades, a member of the Companys
board of directors, provides legal services to the Company and
to its predecessor, Primelead Limited through his law firm,
Savvas D. Georghiades, Law Office. In the year ended
December 31, 2010, the Company and Primelead Limited paid a
fee of Euro 94,235 for the legal services provided by
Mr. Georghiades.
Related
party transactions on the balance sheet
DryShips, makes a number of payments towards yard installments,
loan installments, loan interest and interest rate swap payments
on behalf of Ocean Rig UDW. The receivable from or payable to
DryShips Inc. included in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets amounted to receivables of $4,934 and payables of $48,110
as of December 31, 2009. There were no receivables or
payables as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
5.
|
Acquisition
of Ocean Rig:
|
5.1
Initial investment in 2007 using the equity
method:
On December 20, 2007, the Company acquired
51,778,647 shares or 30.4% of the issued shares in Ocean
Rig ASA from a related party (Note 4). Ocean Rig ASA,
incorporated on September 26, 1996 and at that time
domiciled in Norway, was a public limited company whose shares
previously traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
F-66
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The Company accounted for its investment in Ocean Rig for the
year ended December 31, 2007, and for the period from
January 1, 2008 to May 14, 2008 using the equity
method of accounting. The Companys proportionate share in
the loss of Ocean Rig ASA and related amortization of purchase
price allocation adjustments is shown in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as Equity in loss of investee
and amounted to a loss of $1,055.
Summarized financial information of the Companys equity
method investees that represent 100% of the investees
financial information, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2008
|
|
|
Result of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
99,172
|
|
Operating income/ (loss)
|
|
$
|
19,521
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(23,396
|
)
|
5.2
Subsequent step transactions in 2008 to acquire
100%
After acquiring more than 33% of Ocean Rig ASAs
outstanding shares on April 22, 2008, the Company, as
required by Norwegian Law, launched a mandatory bid for the
remaining shares of Ocean Rig at a price of NOK45 per share
($8.89 per share). The Company acquired control over Ocean Rig
ASA on May 14, 2008. The results of operations related to
the acquisition are included in the consolidated financial
statements since May 15, 2008. The mandatory bid expired on
June 11, 2008. As of July 10, 2008, the total shares
held by the Company in Ocean Rig amounted to 100%
(163.6 million shares). Out of the total shares acquired as
discussed above, 5.4% of the share capital of Ocean Rig was
purchased from companies controlled by George Economou
(Note 4).
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a
non-controlling minority interest on its balance sheet in
accordance with guidance related to classification and
measurement of redeemable equity securities. The resulting
non-controlling interest was recorded at its fair value based
upon the bid price in NOK which exceeded it carrying value with
a reduction in paid in capital. When the non-controlling
interest was purchased the adjustment to the carrying amount was
eliminated in the manner it was initially recorded by increasing
paid in capital with a resulting exchange rate difference of
$212.
As a result of the change of control provisions in Ocean Rig
ASAs employee stock option program, employee options
became immediately vested and Ocean Rig ASA sold shares for cash
to certain employees. The resulting gain of $7,087 for Ocean Rig
UDW was recorded as equity transaction in consolidation and
increased consolidated paid in capital. These shares were
subsequently acquired by the Company through the public
mandatory bid discussed in the paragraph above. Subsequent to
the Company obtaining control of Ocean Rig ASA, Ocean Rig ASA
retired treasury shares increasing the relative book value owned
by the Company which was recorded as an increase in consolidated
paid in capital of $16,852.
F-67
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
5.3
Purchase price allocation
The purchase price of Ocean Rig for each step of the acquisition
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
July 10,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$
|
405,168
|
|
|
|
682,427
|
|
|
|
288,978
|
|
|
|
21,283
|
|
|
$
|
1,397,856
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
3,510
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
10,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
406,024
|
|
|
|
688,581
|
|
|
|
292,488
|
|
|
|
21,523
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the aggregate fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Company as of the
dates of the step acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
May 14,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
July 10,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
28,469
|
|
|
|
43,179
|
|
|
|
25,029
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
$
|
98,572
|
|
Drilling rigs, machinery and equipment
|
|
|
386,080
|
|
|
|
664,659
|
|
|
|
288,981
|
|
|
|
21,976
|
|
|
|
1,361,696
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
14,434
|
|
Above market acquired time charter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
252,070
|
|
|
|
358,146
|
|
|
|
141,515
|
|
|
|
9,998
|
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$
|
670,985
|
|
|
|
1,075,286
|
|
|
|
459,636
|
|
|
|
34,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,240,094
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(45,439
|
)
|
|
|
(238,944
|
)
|
|
|
(108,629
|
)
|
|
|
(8,223
|
)
|
|
|
(401,235
|
)
|
Total non current liabilities
|
|
|
(207,632
|
)
|
|
|
(130,127
|
)
|
|
|
(52,506
|
)
|
|
|
(3,975
|
)
|
|
|
(394,241
|
)
|
Below market acquired time charter
|
|
|
(11,890
|
)
|
|
|
(17,633
|
)
|
|
|
(6,013
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
(36,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
(264,961
|
)
|
|
|
(386,705
|
)
|
|
|
(167,148
|
)
|
|
|
(12,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(831,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
406,024
|
|
|
|
688,581
|
|
|
|
292,488
|
|
|
|
21,525
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contingent liability that was settled during the allocation
period of $3,143 was recognized, based on a claim from an
investment bank in relation to DryShips acquisition of Ocean Rig
ASA.
Goodwill included in the Companys single segment
constitutes a premium paid by the Company over the fair value of
the net assets of Ocean Rig ASA, which was attributable to the
anticipated benefits from Ocean Rig ASAs unique position
to take advantage of the fundamentals of the ultra deep water
drilling market at the acquisition date. Goodwill is not
deductible for income tax purposes. Goodwill was subsequently
impaired as of December 31, 2008 (Note 17).
In connection with the acquisition, the Company acquired
drilling contracts for the future contract drilling services of
Ocean Rig ASA, some of which extend through 2011. These
contracts include fixed day rates that were above or below day
rates available as of the acquisition date. After determining
the aggregate fair values of these drilling contracts as of the
acquisition, the Company recorded the respective contract fair
values on the consolidated balance sheet as non-current
liabilities and non-current assets under Fair value of
below/above market acquired time charters. These are being
amortized into revenues using the straight-line method over the
respective contract periods (1 and 3 years for the
respective contracts). The amount amortized for the period from
May 15, 2008 to December 31, 2008 amounted to $16,553.
For 2009 the amount amortized was $14,597. For 2010 the amount
amortized was $(1,221).
F-68
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Additionally, the Company identified finite-lived intangible
assets associated with the trade names and software that will be
amortized over their useful life which is determined to be
10 years. The fair value of the intangible assets acquired
related to Trade names and Software were $8,774 and $5,659,
respectively and are included in Intangible assets,
net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization as of
|
|
|
Amount to be Amortized as of December 31
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014-18
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
$
|
8,774
|
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
$
|
3,759
|
|
Software
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,434
|
|
|
|
3,928
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
$
|
6,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the amount amortized to December 31, 2008 was
$97 and $67 related to Trade names and Software, respectively,
that was recorded in the Equity in (loss)/income of
investee.
Pro forma results of operations (unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma financial data for the periods
ended December 31, 2008, give effect to the acquisition of
Ocean Rig ASA, as though the business combination had been
completed at the beginning of the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pro forma:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
317,835
|
|
Net Operating Income/(loss)
|
|
|
(669,675
|
)
|
Net Income/(loss)
|
|
|
(789,250
|
)
|
Earnings per Shares, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(7.65
|
)
|
The unaudited pro forma financial information includes
adjustments for additional depreciation based on the fair market
value of the drilling rigs, amortization of intangibles arising
from the step acquisitions and amortization of the fair value
above and below market with respect to the time charters
acquired and increased interest expense and financing fees
related to debt incurred to finance the acquisition of Ocean Rig
ASA. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not
necessarily indicative of the result of operations for any
future periods. The pro forma information does not give effect
to any potential revenue enhancement cost synergies or other
operational efficiencies that could result from the
acquisitions. The actual results of the operations of Ocean Rig
ASA are consolidated since May 15, 2008, the date when
control was obtained.
Restricted cash balances include minimum required cash deposits,
as defined in the loan agreements, are classified as both
current and non-current assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
F-69
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Restricted cash as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 amounted
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amount pledged as collateral for bank loans (Note 10 b and
e)
|
|
$
|
187,389
|
|
|
$
|
529,815
|
|
Amounts pledged as collateral to customer
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Amounts representing minimum liquidity requirements under the
loan facilities (Note 10)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Taxes withheld from employees
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted cash
|
|
$
|
220,690
|
|
|
$
|
562,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash of $50,000 of total $562,793 has been classified
as non-current as of December 31, 2010. As of
December 31, 2009 total of $220,690 restricted cash was
classified as current.
|
|
7.
|
Rigs
under Construction:
|
The amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets include the fair value at acquisition, milestone payments
relating to the shipbuilding contracts with the shipyards,
supervision costs and any material related expenses incurred
during the construction periods including 1% commissions to
related parties for Hulls 1837 and 1838, all of which are
capitalized in accordance with the accounting policy discussed
in Note 2. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010 the
advances for rigs under construction and acquisitions are set
forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Adjustments at
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Expected Delivery
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated).
|
|
|
H1837
|
|
January 2011
|
|
$
|
691,008
|
|
|
|
254,346
|
|
|
|
27,178
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
$
|
370,524
|
|
H1838
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
690,758
|
|
|
|
254,346
|
|
|
|
26,041
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
369,387
|
|
H1865
|
|
July 2011
|
|
|
715,541
|
|
|
|
205,940
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,767
|
|
H1866
|
|
September 2011
|
|
|
715,541
|
|
|
|
205,940
|
|
|
|
12,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,812,848
|
|
|
|
920,572
|
|
|
|
79,820
|
|
|
|
178,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,178,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Adjustments at
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Expected Delivery
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
H1837
|
|
January 2011
|
|
$
|
696,524
|
|
|
|
407,505
|
|
|
|
78,031
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
$
|
574,536
|
|
H1838
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
695,000
|
|
|
|
407,505
|
|
|
|
55,670
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
552,175
|
|
H1865
|
|
July 2011
|
|
|
731,987
|
|
|
|
374,833
|
|
|
|
33,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,866
|
|
H1866
|
|
September 2011
|
|
|
731,614
|
|
|
|
322,812
|
|
|
|
31,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,855,125
|
|
|
|
1,512,655
|
|
|
|
197,835
|
|
|
|
178,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,888,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 the
Contract amount increased from $2,812,848 to $2,855,125 from
scope changes.
F-70
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 the
movement of the advances for drillships under construction and
acquisitions was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
Acquisitions of Hulls 1837/ 1838 (May 15, 2009)
|
|
|
625,445
|
|
Acquisitions of Hulls 1865/ 1866 (March 5, 2009)
|
|
|
422,114
|
|
Advances for drillships under construction
|
|
|
95,673
|
|
Capitalized interest (as restated)
|
|
|
24,457
|
|
Capitalized expenses
|
|
|
8,834
|
|
Related Parties
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at, December 31, 2009 (as restated)
|
|
$
|
1,178,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,178,392
|
|
Advances for drillships under construction
|
|
|
592,085
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
35,781
|
|
Capitalized expenses
|
|
|
78,249
|
|
Related Parties
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,888,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are
analyzed as follows:
Drilling
Rigs, machinery and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance on acquisition May 14, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,405,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,405,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
16,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,584
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,571
|
)
|
|
|
(44,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,421,930
|
|
|
|
(44,571
|
)
|
|
|
1,377,359
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
14,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,152
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,905
|
)
|
|
|
(73,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,436,082
|
|
|
|
(118,476
|
)
|
|
|
1,317,607
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
6,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,835
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(2,800
|
)
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
(1,458
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,651
|
)
|
|
|
(73,651
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,440,117
|
|
|
|
( 190,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,249,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, all of the Companys
drilling rigs and drillships under construction have been
pledged as collateral to secure the bank loans (Note 10).
F-71
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
9.
|
Intangible
Assets and Liabilities:
|
The Company identified, in connection with the acquisition of
Ocean Rig, finite-lived intangible assets associated with the
trade names, software, and above market acquired time charters
that are being amortized over their useful lives. In the case of
the trade names and software, the useful lives are estimated to
be ten years. The useful lives of above market acquired time
charters depend on the contract term remaining at the date of
acquisition. Trade names and software are included in
Intangible assets, net in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets net of accumulated amortization.
Above-market acquired time charters are presented separately in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, net of accumulated
amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
for the Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
$
|
8,774
|
|
|
|
(1,507
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,005
|
)
|
Software
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(1,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets, net
|
|
$
|
14,433
|
|
|
|
(2,485
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,296
|
)
|
Above market time charters
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of long-term debt shown in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets is analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Two 562,500 Loan Agreements
|
|
$
|
186,274
|
|
|
$
|
194,524
|
|
1,040,000 Credit Facility
|
|
|
808,550
|
|
|
|
675,833
|
|
230,000 Credit Facility
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
300,000 Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan Facilities outstanding
|
|
|
1,224,824
|
|
|
|
1,285,357
|
|
Less: Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(24,794
|
)
|
|
|
(27,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt reflected in balance sheet
|
|
|
1,200,030
|
|
|
|
1,257,547
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(537,668
|
)
|
|
|
(560,561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
662,362
|
|
|
$
|
696,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The principal payments, excluding deferred financing costs, to
be made during each of the twelve-month periods subsequent to
December 31, 2010 for the loan payments as classified in
the balance sheet in, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
568,333
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
522,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
|
1,285,357
|
|
Less: Financing fees
|
|
|
(27,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt reflected in balance sheet
|
|
$
|
1,257,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Total interest and debt amortization cost incurred on long-term
debt for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010
amounted to $63,407 and $57,350, respectively, of which $24,457
and $35,780 respectively, were capitalized as part of the cost
of the rigs under construction. Total interest incurred and
amortization of debt issuance cost on long-term debt, net of
capitalized interest, are included in Interest and finance
costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations.
Total interest incurred on the Companys long-term debt,
including accrued interest, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to $55,165 ,
$57,154 and $35,827 respectively. These amounts are included in
Interest and finance costs in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. The Companys
weighted average interest rate (including the margin) as of
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was 5.0%, 4.2% and 4.5%,
respectively. The stated interest rates on the debt is variable,
based on LIBOR plus a margin. At December 31, 2008, 2009
and 2010, the margin ranged from 4.3% to 7.9%, 3.5% to 4.8% and
4.3% to 4.6%, respectively.
On May 9, 2008, the Company concluded a guarantee facility
of NOK 5.0 billion (approximately $974,500) and a term loan
of $800,000 in order to guarantee the purchase price of the
Ocean Rig shares to be acquired through the mandatory offering,
to finance the acquisition cost of the Ocean Rig shares and to
refinance existing debt. The term loan was repayable in four
quarterly installments of $75,000 followed by four quarterly
installments of $50,000 plus a balloon payment payable together
with the last installment on May 12, 2010. As of
December 31, 2008 the Company drew down the total amount of
$800,000 and repaid $150,000. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company had fully repaid it. The facility contained various
covenants measured on a consolidated DryShips Inc. level,
including a minimum market-adjusted equity ratio.
During the first quarter of 2009 and in April 2009, the Company
repaid $190,000 and $160,000, respectively, of its existing
$800,000 facility. The remaining outstanding balance of $300,000
was fully repaid in May 2009, of which $150,000 was paid with
the Companys new credit facility discussed in the
following paragraph below.
On May 13, 2009, the Company entered into a new one-year
credit facility with the same lender as above for an amount of
up to $300,000 in order to refinance the Companys existing
loan indebtedness discussed in the above paragraph. In May 2009,
the Company drew down $150,000 of the loan in order to refinance
the $150,000 outstanding debt at the date of the drawdown of the
above facility. The loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin.
This new credit facility was fully repaid in May 2009 using
proceeds from an increase in paid in capital from DryShips.
DryShips financed the capital contribution to the Company
from its
at-the-market
offerings. The undrawn amount of the facility was fully
cancelled.
b) Two
562,500 Loan Agreements (the Two Deutsche Bank
Facilities):
On March 5, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of
Drillships Investment Inc. including the two companies owning
drillship Hulls 1865 and 1866, as further described in
Note 5, the Company assumed two facility agreements for an
aggregate amount of $1,125,000 in order to partly finance the
construction cost of Drillship Hulls 1865 and 1866. The Two
562,500 Loan Agreements bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin and
are repayable in eighteen semi-annual installments through
November 2020. The first installment is payable six months after
the delivery of the vessels, which is expected to be in the
third quarter of 2011. The Two 562,500 Loan Agreements contains
various covenants measured on a consolidated DryShips Inc.
level, including: (i) a minimum market-adjusted equity
ratio; and (ii) a minimum market value adjusted net worth.
F-73
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
On June 5, 2009, the Company entered into agreements with a
bank, as facility agent, and certain other lenders on waiver and
amendment terms with respect to the Two 562,500 Loan Agreements
providing for a waiver of certain financial covenants through
January 31, 2010. These agreements provide for, among other
things; (i) a waiver of the required market adjusted equity
ratio; (ii) a waiver of the required market value adjusted
net worth; and (iii) a required payment from us to each
lender and the facility agent.
On January 28, 2010, the Company signed two supplemental
agreements that provided for certain non-financial covenant
amendments to the Two 562,500 Loan Agreements. In addition these
agreements revoked all waivers previously obtained related to
the Two 562,500 Loan Agreements.
A basic principle of the two credit facilities is that any
drawdown on the credit facility, prior to securing certain
drilling contracts at acceptable terms is subject to cash
deposit collateral of an equivalent amount to any drawdown.
As of December 31, 2010, the amount outstanding under the
Two 562,500 Loan Agreements was $194,524. Cash deposits
equivalent to the drawdowns on the Two 562,500 Loan Agreements
are included as restricted cash (note 6).
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had an unutilized line
of credit totaling $930,476. Drawdowns under this line of credit
must be matched with corresponding cash collateral until the
drillships enter into employment contracts for both vessels at
specified minimum dayrates and for specified minimum terms with
a charterer that is satisfactory to such lenders by the earlier
of (i) April 30, 2011 or (ii) the delivery of the
Ocean Rig Poseidon, at which point no cash collateral is
needed. The Company is required to pay a quarterly commitment
fee of 0.60% per annum of the unutilized portion of the
unutilized line of credit.
On March 28, 2011 the company restructured these
facilities, see note 23.8.
|
|
c)
|
1,040,000
Credit Facility:
|
On September 17, 2008, the Company entered into a new
five-year secured credit facility for the amount of up to
$1,040,000 in order to refinance the Companys existing
loan indebtedness in relation to the drilling units Leiv
Eiriksson and Eirik Raude and for general corporate purposes.
The 1,040,000 Credit Facility consists of a guarantee facility,
three revolving credit facilities (a, b and c) and a term
loan. The aggregate amount of the term loan is up to $400,000
and the aggregate amount under the revolving credit facility A
is up to $350,000. The aggregate amount under the revolving
credit facility b is up to $250,000 and under the revolving
credit facility c is up to $20,000. The guarantee facility
provides the Company with a credit facility of up to $20,000.
In September and October, 2008, the Company drew down $1,020,000
of the new credit facility. The drawdown proceeds were used to
repay all other Ocean Rig outstanding debt at the date of the
drawdown amounting to $776,000.
The commitment under 1,040,000 Credit Facilitys Revolving
Credit Facility A was reduced by $17,500 on December 17,
2008 and will continue to be reduced by $17,500 quarterly
thereafter until September 17, 2013, which is
60 months after the date of the agreement. Further, the
commitment under 1,040,000 Credit Facilitys Revolving
Credit Facility B is reduced quarterly by 12 unequal quarterly
installments with a final maturity date of not later than the
earlier of a) the expiry of the time charter of the
drilling rig the Eirik Raude, which is scheduled to expire in
October 2011 or b) September, 2011. This loan bears
interest at LIBOR plus a margin and is repayable in twenty
quarterly installments. The term loan will be repaid by one
balloon payment of $400,000 on September 17, 2013.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the outstanding balances
under the 1,040,000 Credit Facility were $808,550 and $675,833,
respectively.
F-74
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
d)
|
230,000
Credit Facility:
|
In connection with the acquisition of Drillships Holdings on
May 15, 2009, the Company assumed the $230,000 loan
facility that was entered into in September 2007, in order to
finance the construction of Hulls 1837 and 1838. The 230,000
Credit Facility bear interest at the lenders funding cost
a margin, and are repayable upon the delivery of Hull 1837 in
January 2011, and Hull 1838 in March 2011. Borrowings under the
230,000 Credit Facility are subject to certain financial
covenants and restrictions on dividend payments, assignment of
the relevant shipbuilding contracts, refund guarantees and other
related items. In addition to the customary security and
guarantees issued to the borrower, the 230,000 Credit Facility
was collateralized by certain vessels owned by certain related
parties, corporate guarantees of certain related parties and a
personal guarantee from George Economou. The Company repaid
$115.0 million of the loan facility on December 22,
2010 in connection with the delivery of the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and the remaining $115.0 million of the loan
facility on March 18, 2011 in connection with the delivery
of the Ocean Rig Olympia.
In connection with the acquisition of Drillships Holdings on
May 15, 2009, the Company also assumed two $15,551
fixed-rate term notes that were entered into in January 2009, in
order to finance the construction of Hulls 1837 and 1838. The
term notes were fully repaid in July 2010.
e) 300,000
Credit Facility:
On December 28, 2010 the Company concluded a $300,000 loan
facility to be repaid during 2011 which was callable by the bank
at anytime and could be repaid without prepayment penalties. The
loan was fully drawn on December 28, 2010 and fully repaid
on January 3, 2011, see note 23.3. The loan cannot be
redrawn. A corresponding amount was deposited on a required
escrow account as required by the loan agreement as security for
the loan, which is classified as restricted cash. Interest on
the facility is LIBOR plus a margin while the borrowed funds are
held with the bank earning LIBOR plus a margin.
|
|
f)
|
325,000
Credit Facility:
|
On December 21, 2010 the Company concluded a $325,000
bridge term loan facility, with its subsidiary Drillships Hydra
Owners Inc. as intended borrower, for the purpose of
(i) meeting the ongoing working capital needs of Drillships
Hydra Owners Inc, (ii) financing the partial repayment of
existing debt in relation to the purchase of the drillship
identified as Samsung Hull 1837, or Ocean Rig Corcovado, and
(iii) financing the payment of the final installment
associated with the purchase of said drillship. Dry Ships Inc.,
Drillships Holdings Inc. and Ocean Rig UDW Inc. will act as
joint guarantors and guarantee all obligations and liabilities
of Drillships Hydra Owners Inc. The loan was drawn in full on
January 5, 2011 and matures July 5, 2011.
The loans above (a-f) are secured by a first priority mortgage
over the drillships/drill rigs or assignment of shipbuilding
contracts, corporate guarantee, and a first assignment of all
freights, earnings, insurances and requisition compensation. The
loans contain covenants including restrictions, without the
banks prior consent, as to changes in management and
ownership of the vessels, additional indebtedness and mortgaging
of vessels, change in the general nature of the Companys
business, and maintaining an established place of business in
the United States or the United Kingdom. The loan described
under the 1,040,000 Credit Facility also contains certain
financial covenants relating to the Companys financial
position, operating performance and liquidity. The loans
described under the Two 562,500 Loan Agreements, the 230,000
Credit Facility and the 325,000 Credit Facility above also
contain certain financial covenants relating to the consolidated
financial position of DryShips Inc., operating performance and
liquidity.
F-75
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
A default situation in DryShips could have a substantial effect
on the Company. Should DryShips fail to pay loan installments as
they fall due, this would result in a cross-default on the
Companys facilities. As of December 31, 2008 and
2009, DryShips was deemed to be in theoretical default of all
its bank facilities. Due to the cross-default situation and
breach of certain financial covenants both for the Company and
for DryShips, the loan balances under the Companys
affected facilities was fully classified as current. The cross
default provisions of the Companys credit facility
1,040,000 is only triggered by the actual default on other
indebtedness and was therefore classified as non-current except
for repayments due in the next twelve months. In accordance with
guidance related to classification of obligation that are
callable by the creditor, the Company has as per
December 31, 2009 classified all of its affected long-term
debt in breach due to cross-default clauses of the credit
facility agreements amounting to $400,036 as current at
December 31, 2009. As per December 31, 2010 there was
no default situation in DryShips and therefore no cross-default
for the Companys loans.
|
|
11.
|
Financial
Instruments and Fair Value Measurements:
|
All derivatives are carried at fair value on the consolidated
balance sheets at each period end. Balances as of
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(5,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,467
|
)
|
|
|
(12,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,503
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(64,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,219
|
)
|
|
|
(96,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(69,686
|
)
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
(69,252
|
)
|
|
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
(107,866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
Interest
rate swaps and cap and floor agreements:
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Company had
outstanding eleven interest rate swap and cap and floor
agreements, with a notional amount of $1,285,000 and $908,468
respectively, maturing from September 2011 through November
2017. These agreements are entered into in order to economically
hedge its exposure to interest rate fluctuations with respect to
the Companys borrowings. As of December 31, 2009 and
2010, eight of these agreements do not qualify for hedge
accounting and, as such, changes in their fair values are
included in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, three
agreements qualify for and are designated for hedge accounting
and, as such, changes in their fair values are included in other
comprehensive loss. The fair value of these agreements equates
to the amount that would be paid by the Company if the
agreements were cancelled at the reporting date, taking into
account current interest rates and creditworthiness of the
Company.
As of December 31, 2010, security deposits (margin calls)
of $78,600 were paid by the Company and were recorded as
Other non-current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. These deposits are required by the
counterparty due to the market loss in the swap agreements.
|
|
11.2
|
Foreign
currency forward contracts:
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Company had
outstanding ten forward contracts to sell $20 million for
NOK 119 million and twelve forward contracts to sell
$28 million for NOK 174 million. These agreements are
F-76
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
entered into in order to hedge its exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations. The fair value of these contracts at
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 was an asset
of $434 and an asset of $1,538 respectively.
The change in the fair value of such agreements for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 amounted to a gain of
$2,023 and a gain of $1,104 respectively and is reflected under
Other, net in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Derivatives Designated as
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(31,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,028
|
)
|
|
|
(36,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial Instruments current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments current liabilities
|
|
|
(5,467
|
)
|
|
|
(12,503
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Financial Instruments non- current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments-non current liabilities
|
|
|
(33,191
|
)
|
|
|
(60,378
|
)
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
Financial instruments current assets
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
Financial instruments current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,658
|
)
|
|
|
(72,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
(69,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of Derivative Instruments on Accumulated other
comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Derivatives Designated for Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
9,887
|
|
|
$
|
(27,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,887
|
|
|
$
|
(27,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No portion of the cash flow hedges shown above was ineffective
during the year. In addition, the Company did not transfer any
gains/losses on the hedges from accumulated OCI into the
consolidated statement of operations.
F-77
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
Recognized
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Gain/(loss) interest rate swaps
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
|
$
|
(39,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either
assets or liabilities at fair value on its consolidated balance
sheet. The Company has designated all qualifying interest rate
swap contracts as cash flow hedges, with the last qualifying
contract expiring in September 2013.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on
the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge
ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment
of effectiveness are recognized in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations. Changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments that have not been designated as hedging instruments
are reported in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations.
The Company enters into interest rate swap transactions to
manage interest costs and risk associated with changing interest
rates with respect to its variable interest rate loans and
credit facilities. The Company enters into foreign currency
forward contracts in order to manage risks associated with
future hire rates and fluctuations in foreign currencies,
respectively. All of the Companys derivative transactions
are entered into for risk management purposes.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash and trade accounts receivable reported in the consolidated
balance sheets approximate their respective fair values because
of the short term nature of these accounts. The fair value of
the interest rate swaps was determined using a discounted cash
flow method based on market-based LIBOR swap yield curves,
taking into account current interest rates and the
creditworthiness of both the financial instrument counterparty
and the Company. The fair value of foreign currency forward
contracts was based on the forward exchange rates.
Fair value measurements are classified based upon inputs used to
develop the measurement under the following hierarchy:
Level 1 Quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable market-based inputs
or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are not
corroborated by market data.
F-78
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The following table summarizes the valuation of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
the valuation date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps-liability position
|
|
$
|
(69,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts asset position
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(69,252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,252
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps-liability position
|
|
$
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts asset position
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(107,886
|
)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
(109,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
Amortization
plan deferred OCI Cash flow hedge financing cost:
|
In 2011 the drillships will be delivered and put into operation.
As the depreciation of the drillships will start in 2011, a
portion of the net amount of the existing gains or losses on
cash flow hedges reported in accumulated other comprehensive
income will need to be reclassified into earnings. The estimated
net amount of such existing gains or losses at December 31,
2010 that will be reclassified into earnings within the next
12 months is $694.
The following table summarizes the accumulated cash flow hedge
interest expense in Other Comprehensive Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Accumulated Cash flow interest expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,776
|
)
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Pensions in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Pension benefit obligation/ (asset)
|
|
$
|
(388
|
)
|
|
$
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has three pension benefit plans for employees
managed and funded through Norwegian life insurance companies.
As of December 31, 2010 the pension plans cover
55 employees. The pension scheme is in compliance with the
Norwegian law on required occupational pension.
The Company uses a January 1 measurement date for net periodic
pension cost and a December 31 measurement date for benefit
obligations and plan assets.
For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the
projected benefit obligation, the actuarial present value, as of
our December 31 measurement data, of all benefits attributed by
the pension benefit formula to employee service rendered to that
date. The amount for benefit to be paid depends on a number of
future events incorporated into the pension benefit formula,
including estimates of the average life of employees/survivors
and average years of service rendered. It is measured based on
assumptions concerning future interest rates and future employee
compensation levels.
The following table presents this reconsolidation and shows the
change in the projected benefit obligation for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at January 1
|
|
$
|
7,032
|
|
|
$
|
8,897
|
|
Service cost for benefits earned
|
|
|
4,121
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(2,985
|
)
|
Actuarial gains/(losses)
|
|
|
(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
149
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Payroll tax of employer contribution
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,897
|
|
|
$
|
8,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-80
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The following table presents the change in the value of plan
assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and
the plans funded status at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at January 1,
|
|
$
|
6,320
|
|
|
$
|
9,284
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
(1,986
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
9,284
|
|
|
$
|
7,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded/(unfunded) status at end of year
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive incomes that
have not yet been recognized in net periodic benefit cost at
December 31 are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
3,337
|
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan adjustment, before tax effect
|
|
$
|
3,524
|
|
|
$
|
3,730
|
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans
represents the actuarial present value of benefit based on
employee service and compensation as of a certain date and does
not include an assumption about future compensation levels. The
accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $2,995
at December 31, 2010 and $6,265 at December 31, 2009.
The net periodic pension cost recognized in consolidated
statements of income was $2,981, 3,652 and 2,008 for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
The following table presents the components of net periodic
pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
$
|
(410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(378
|
)
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
4,121
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
2,981
|
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The table below presents the components of changes in Plan
Assets and Benefit Obligations recognized in Other Comprehensive
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,101
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(1,511
|
)
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net pension cost and other comprehensive
income, before tax effects
|
|
$
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
(570
|
)
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss for pension benefits that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into the
periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year is $112.
Pension obligations are actuarially determined and are affected
by assumptions including expected return on plan assets. As of
December 31, 2010 contributions amounting to $741 in total,
have been made to the defined benefit pension plan.
The Company evaluates assumptions regarding the estimated
long-term rate of return on plan assets based on historical
experience and future expectations on investment returns, which
are calculated by an unaffiliated investment advisor utilizing
the asset allocation classes held by the plans portfolios.
Changes in these and other assumptions used in the actuarial
computations could impact the Companys projected benefit
obligations, pension liabilities, pension cost and other
comprehensive income.
The Company bases its determination of pension cost on a
market-related valuation of assets that reduces
year-to-year
volatility. This market-related valuation recognizes investment
gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which
they occur. Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the
difference between the expected return calculated using the
market-related value of assets and the actual return based on
the market-related value of assets.
The following are the weighted average assumptions
used to determine net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Weighted average assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
5.40
|
%
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Compensation increases
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
The Companys investments are managed by the insurance
company Storebrand by using models presenting many different
asset allocation scenarios to assess the most appropriate target
allocation to produce long-term gains without taking on undue
risk. US GAAP standards require disclosures for financial assets
and liabilities that are re-
F-82
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
measured at fair value at least annually. The following table
set forth the pension assets at fair value as of
December 31, 2009 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Share and other equity investments
|
|
$
|
1,086
|
|
|
$
|
1,214
|
|
Bonds and other security fixed yield
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
Bonds held to maturity
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
Properties and real estate
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
Other
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total plan net assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
9,284
|
|
|
$
|
7,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The law requires a low risk profile; hence the majority of the
funds are invested in government bonds and high-rated corporate
bonds.
Investments are stated at fair value. Fair value is the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. Investments in securities traded on a
national securities exchange are valued at the last reported
sales price on the last business day of the year. If no sale was
reported on that date, they are valued at the last reported bid
price. Investments in securities not traded on a national
securities exchange are valued using pricing models, quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted
cash flows.
Alternative investments, binding investment in private equity,
private bonds, hedge funds, and real assets, do not have readily
available marked values. These estimated fair values may differ
significantly from the values that would have been used had a
ready market for these investments existed, and such differences
could be material. Private equity, private bonds, hedge funds
and other investments not having an established market are
valued at net assets values as determined by the investment
managers, which management had determined approximates fair
value. Investments in real assets funds are stated at the
aggregate net asset value of the units of these funds, which
management has determined approximate fair value. Real assets
are valued either at amounts based upon appraisal reports
prepared by appraisal performed by the investment manager, which
management has determined approximates.
Purchases and sales of securities are recorded as of the trade
date. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are
determined on the basis of average cost. Interest income is
recognized on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recognized
on the ex-dividend date.
The major categories of plan assets as a percentage of the fair
value of plan assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Shares and other equity instruments
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Bonds
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Properties and real estate
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-83
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The US GAAP standards require disclosures for financial assets
and liabilities that are re-measured at fair value at least
annually. The US GAAP standards establish a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value. Tiers include three levels which are explained below:
Level 1:
Financial instruments valued on the basis of quoted priced for
identical assets in active markets. This category encompasses
listed equities that over the previous six months have
experienced a daily average turnover equivalent to approximately
$3,462 or more. Based on this, the equities are regarded as
sufficiently liquid to be encompassed by this level. Bonds,
certificates or equivalent instruments issued by national
governments are generally classified as level 1. In the
case of derivatives, standardized equity-linked and interest
rate futures will be encompassed by this level.
Level 2:
Financial instruments valued on the basis of observable market
information not covered by level 1. This category
encompasses financial instruments that are valued on the basis
of market information that can be directly observable or
indirectly observable. Market information that is indirectly
observable means that prices can be derived from observable,
related markets. Level 2 encompasses equities or equivalent
equity instruments for which market prices are available, but
where the turnover volume is too limited to meet the criteria in
level 1. Equities on this level will normally have been
traded during the last month. Bonds and equivalent instruments
are generally classified as level 2. Interest rate and
currency swaps, non-standardized interest rate and currency
derivatives, and credit default swaps are also classified as
level 2. Funds are generally classified as level 2,
and encompass equity, interest rate, and hedge funds.
Level 3:
Financial instruments valued on the basis of information that is
not observable pursuant to by level 2. Equities classified
as level 3 encompass investments in primarily
unlisted/private companies. These include investments in
forestry, real estate and infrastructure. Private equity is
generally classified as level 3 through direct investments
or investments in funds. Asset backed securities (ABS),
residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) and commercial
mortgage backed securities (CMBS) are classified as level 3
due to their generally limited liquidity and transparency in the
market.
F-84
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value
hierarchy, the pension asset at fair value as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Equities
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
Non-US Equities
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
Fixed Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Bonds
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Alternative Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge funds and limited partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Plan Net Assets
|
|
$
|
5,089
|
|
|
$
|
1,067
|
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
$
|
7,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value
hierarchy, the pension asset at fair value as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Equities
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
Non-US Equities
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
Fixed Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Bonds
|
|
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
Alternative Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge funds and limited partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Other
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Plan Net Assets
|
|
$
|
6,304
|
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
9,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The tables below set forth a summary of changes in the fair
value of the pension assets level 3 investment assets for
the years ended December 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,161
|
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
Actual return on plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets sold during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets still held at reporting date
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (net)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Plan Net Assets
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following pension benefits contributions are expected to be
paid by the Company during the years ending:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
84
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
66
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
106
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
107
|
|
December 31, 2016 2021
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension payments
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys estimated employer contribution to the define
benefit pension plan for the fiscal year 2011 is $678.
The Company has a defined contribution pension plan that
includes 354 employees. The contribution to the defined
contribution pension plan for the year 2010 was $1,775. The
contribution to the defined contribution pension plan for the
years 2009 and 2008 was $104 and $54 respectively.
|
|
13.
|
Other
non-current assets
|
The amount of other non-current assets shown in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets is analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Margin calls
|
|
|
40,700
|
|
|
|
78,600
|
|
Advance payments drillships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,569
|
|
Drillship options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
40,700
|
|
|
|
472,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 22, 2010, the Company, entered into a contract
with Samsung that granted DryShips options for the construction
of up to four additional ultra-deepwater drillships, which would
be sister-ships to the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
Ocean Rig Olympia and the two drillships currently under
construction and would have the same specifications as the Ocean
Rig Poseidon with certain upgrades to vessel design and
specifications. Each of the four options may be exercised at any
time on or prior to November 22, 2011, with vessel
deliveries ranging from 2013 to
F-86
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
2014 depending on when the options are exercised. The total
construction cost is estimated to be $638.0 million per
drillship. The option agreement required the Company to pay a
non-refundable slot reservation fee of $24,756 per drillship,
which fee will be applied towards the drillship contract price
if the options are exercised. The cost of the option agreements
of $99,024 was paid on December 30, 2010 and is recorded in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as Other
non-current assets. On December 30, 2010 DryShips
entered into a novation agreement with Ocean Rig UDW and
transferred these options to its subsidiary. As of
December 31, 2010, none of these options have been
exercised.
There is one class of common shares, and each common share is
entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of
shareholders.
Prior to December 8, 2010, the Companys authorized
capital stock consisted of 500 common shares, par value $20.00
per shares. During December 2010, the Company adopted, amended
and restated articles of incorporation pursuant to which its
authorized capital stock will consist of 250,000,000 common
shares, par value $0.01 per share; and (ii) declared and
paid a stock dividend of 103,125,000 shares of its common
stock to its sole shareholder, DryShips. On December 21,
2010 the Company completed through a private placement the sale
of an aggregated of 28,571,428 common shares at $17.50 per
share. Net proceeds from the private placement was $488,301
including $11,699 in attributable costs. The stock dividend has
been accounted for as a stock split. As a result, we
reclassified approximately $1,021 from APIC to common stock,
which represents the par value per share of the shares issued.
All previously reported share and per share amounts have been
restated to reflect the stock dividend.
At December 31, 2010 the Companys authorized capital
stock consisted of 250,000,000 common shares, par value $0.01
per shares, of which 131,696,928 common shares were issued and
outstanding.
|
|
15.
|
Earnings/(loss)
per share
|
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net profit/
(loss) for the year by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net
profit/(loss) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding during the year plus the weighted average number of
ordinary shares that would have been issued on the conversion of
options into ordinary shares.
The Company increased the number of authorized shares to
250,000,000 with par value of $0.01 on December 7, 2010. On
December 8, 2010, the Company declared a stock dividend of
103,125,000 shares to its sole shareholder, DryShips. On
December 21, 2010, the company completed the sale of an
aggregate of 28,571,428 of the Companys common shares
(representing a 22% ownership interest) in an offering made to
both
non-United
States persons in Norway in reliance on Regulation S under
the Securities Act and to qualified institutional buyers in the
United States in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities
Act. We refer to this offering as the private
offering. A company controlled by our Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. George Economou, purchased
2,869,428 common shares, or 2.38% of our outstanding common
shares, in the private offering at the offering price of $17.50
per share. After the completion of the private offering the
Companys common stock issued is 131,696,928 shares
with par value $0.01.
The following reflects the income and the share data used in the
basic and diluted earnings per share computations under
ASC 260-10-55-12,
which states that if the number of common shares outstanding
increases as
F-87
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
a result of a stock dividend prior to the private offering, the
computations of basic and diluted EPS shall be adjusted
retroactively for all periods presented to reflect that change
in capital structure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(Loss)
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable to
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Basic Earnings/
|
|
Applicable to
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
Diluted Earnings/
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
(Loss) per Share
|
|
Diluted Shares
|
|
Diluted
|
|
(Loss) per Share
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
Amount
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
Amount
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
103,908,279
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
134,761
|
|
|
|
103,908,279
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
115,754
|
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
(7.43
|
)
|
|
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
|
103,125,500
|
|
|
|
(7.43
|
)
|
|
|
16.
|
Drilling
rig operating expenses:
|
The amounts of drilling rig operating expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations are analyzed
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Crew wages and related costs
|
|
$
|
46,951
|
|
|
|
76,628
|
|
|
$
|
69,994
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
12,686
|
|
|
|
7,869
|
|
|
|
7,918
|
|
Deferred rig operating cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,361
|
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
26,592
|
|
|
|
44,398
|
|
|
|
37,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
86,229
|
|
|
|
133,256
|
|
|
$
|
119,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the date the Company acquired Ocean Rig ASA in May 2008
through the annual goodwill impairment test performed on
December 31, 2008, the market declined significantly and
various factors negatively affected industry trends and
conditions, which resulted in the revision of certain key
assumptions used in determining the fair value of the
Companys single reporting unit (see Note 21) and
therefore the implied fair value of goodwill. During the second
half of 2008, the credit markets tightened, driving up the cost
of capital and therefore the Company increased the rate of a
long-term weighted average cost of capital. In addition, the
economic downturn and volatile oil prices resulted in a downward
revision of projected cash flows from the Companys
reporting unit in the Companys forecasted discounted cash
flows analysis for its 2008 impairment testing. Furthermore, the
decline in the global economy negatively impacted publicly
traded company multiples used when estimating fair value under
the market approach. Based on results of the Companys
annual goodwill impairment analysis, the Company determined that
the carrying value of the Companys goodwill was impaired.
The Company recognized an impairment charge in the amount of
$761,729 for the full carrying amount of Goodwill which had no
tax effect.
F-88
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The Goodwill balance and changes in the Goodwill is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
Goodwill from acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
(761,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Interest
and Finance Cost:
|
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
Interest costs on long-term debt(*)
|
|
$
|
55,165
|
|
|
|
57,154
|
|
|
$
|
35,827
|
|
Capitalized interest (see note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,457
|
)
|
|
|
(35,780
|
)
|
Bank charges
|
|
|
6,024
|
|
|
|
6,269
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
Commissions and commitment fees
|
|
|
10,503
|
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
46,120
|
|
|
$
|
8,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
In addition, a portion of interest was recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss related to cash flow hedges of the
variability of interest on borrowings that was capitalized as
part of rigs under construction. The amounts recorded were
$21,523 and $6,253 for 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Bank Interest Income
|
|
$
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
6,254
|
|
|
$
|
12,464
|
|
Other Financial Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
$
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig UDW operates through its various subsidiaries in a
number of countries throughout the world. Income taxes have been
provided based upon the tax laws and rates in the countries in
which operations are conducted and income is earned. The
countries in which Ocean Rig UDW operates have taxation regimes
with varying nominal rates, deductions, credits and other tax
attributes. Consequently, there is not an expected relationship
between the provision for/or benefit from income taxes and
income or loss before income taxes.
F-89
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The components of Ocean Rigs income/(losses) before taxes
by country are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
$
|
(40,599
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,438
|
)
|
Norway
|
|
|
(747,018
|
)
|
|
|
499,879
|
|
|
|
14,811
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
|
12,883
|
|
|
|
(370,007
|
)
|
|
|
174,794
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(485
|
)
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
USA
|
|
|
13,820
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Ghana
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
21,628
|
|
|
|
(2,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income/(loss) before taxes and equity in loss of investee
|
|
$
|
(760,148
|
)
|
|
$
|
128,551
|
|
|
$
|
155,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows for each entitys total income tax
expense for the period and statutory tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Cyprus (10.0%)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
Norway (28.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Marshall Islands (0.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turkey(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,950
|
|
Korea (24.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK (28.0%)
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
Ireland (25.0%)
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada (10% 19%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
USA (15.0%-35.0%)
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ghana(**)
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
11,445
|
|
|
|
11,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Tax expense
|
|
$
|
2,844
|
|
|
$
|
12,797
|
|
|
$
|
20,227
|
|
Deferred Tax expense/(benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
$
|
12,797
|
|
|
$
|
20,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Ocean Rig 1 Inc. paid in 2010 withholding tax to Turkey
authorities, based upon 5% of total contract revenues. |
|
(**) |
|
Tax in Ghana is a withholding tax, based upon 5% of total
contract revenues. |
Taxes have not been reflected in Other Comprehensive income
since the valuation allowances would result in no recognition of
deferred tax.
Up to December 15, 2009, when a corporate reorganization
occurred, Ocean Rigs drilling operations were consolidated
in Ocean Rig ASA, a company incorporated and domiciled in
Norway. Subsequently, many of the activities and assets have
moved to jurisdictions that do not have corporate taxation. As a
result, net deferred tax
F-90
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
assets were reversed in 2009. The net deferred tax assets of
$91.6 million consisted of gross deferred tax assets of
$105.1 million net of gross deferred tax liabilities of
$13.5 million. However, a corresponding amount
($91.6 million) of valuation allowance was also reversed.
As a result, there was no impact on deferred tax expense for the
change of tax status of these entities in 2009.
Reconciliation of total tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate multiplied by profit/(loss) before tax*
|
|
$
|
(212,816
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
115 407
|
|
|
|
(93,358
|
)
|
|
|
(14,922
|
)
|
Differences in tax rates
|
|
|
135,908
|
|
|
|
138,865
|
|
|
|
14,177
|
|
Effect of permanent differences
|
|
|
(74,929
|
)
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Adjustments in respect to current income tax of previous years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Effect of exchange rate differences
|
|
|
39,274
|
|
|
|
(65,472
|
)
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
Withholding tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,445
|
|
|
|
19,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,844
|
|
|
$
|
12,797
|
|
|
$
|
20,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Ocean Rig has for 2008 and 2009 elected to use the statutory tax
rate for each year based upon the location where the largest
parts of its operations were domiciled. During 2008 most of its
activities were domiciled in Norway with tax rate 28%. During
2009 and 2010, most of its activities were re-domiciled to
Marshall Islands with tax rate of zero. |
|
|
|
Ocean Rig is subject to changes in tax laws, treaties,
regulations and interpretations in and between the countries in
which its subsidiaries operate. A material change in these tax
laws, treaties, regulations and interpretations could result in
a higher or lower effective tax rate on worldwide earnings. |
F-91
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between
the financial statement basis and the tax basis of the
Companys assets and liabilities at the applicable tax
rates in effect. The significant components of deferred tax
assets and liabilities are as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
65,045
|
|
|
$
|
49,707
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
Accelerated depreciation of assets
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
65,782
|
|
|
$
|
50,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(65,552
|
)
|
|
|
(50,630
|
)
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
Pension
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts above are reflected in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets /(liability)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term net deferred tax assets(liabilities)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Rig ASA filed for liquidation in 2008 and on
December 15, 2009 it distributed all significant assets to
Primelead Ltd., a subsidiary of Dryships, as a liquidation
dividend, including the shares in all its subsidiaries. The
statute of limitation under Norwegian tax law is two years after
the fiscal year, if correct and complete information is
disclosed in the tax return. The tax treatment of the
liquidation is therefore subject to audit by the tax authorities
until the end of 2011. The company does not expect any adverse
tax effects from this transaction.
A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when
it is more likely than not that some or all of the benefit from
the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company
provides a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets for
net operating losses (NOL) incurred during the year
in certain jurisdictions and for other deferred tax assets
where, in the Companys opinion, it is more likely than not
that the financial statement benefit of these losses will not be
realized. The Company provides a valuation allowance for foreign
tax loss carry forward to reflect the possible expiration of
these benefits prior to their utilization. As of
December 31, 2010, the valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets is reduced from $65,552 in 2009 to $50,630 in 2010
reflecting a reduction in net deferred tax assets during the
period. The decrease is primarily a result of the reduction of
deferred tax asset due to utilization of tax loss carry forwards
in Norway and in Cyprus in 2010.
The table below explains the Net operations loss carry
forward in 2010 and 2009 for the countries the Company is
operating in.
F-92
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Norway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
183,998
|
|
|
$
|
144,189
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Net operations loss carry forward, tax effect
|
|
|
51,520
|
|
|
|
40,373
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
57,112
|
|
|
$
|
89,832
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Net operations loss carry forward, tax effect
|
|
|
5,711
|
|
|
|
8,983
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
24,419
|
|
|
$
|
879
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Net operations loss carry forward, tax effect
|
|
|
7,814
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Net operations loss carry forward, tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
265,529
|
|
|
$
|
235,106
|
|
Net operations loss carry forward, tax effect
|
|
|
65,045
|
|
|
|
49,707
|
|
The Company has tax losses, which arose in Norway of $183,998
and $144,146 at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively,
that are available indefinitely for offset against future
taxable profits of the companies in which the losses arose.
However, all of these amounts are related to Ocean Rig ASA,
Ocean Rig Norway AS, Ocean Rig 1 AS and Ocean Rig 2 AS that are
under liquidation. Upon liquidation the tax losses will not be
available.
The Company had tax losses, which arose in Cyprus of $57,112 and
$89,832 at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively that
are available indefinitely for offset against future taxable
profits of the company in which the losses arose. A 100%
valuation allowance in the assets resulting from the loss carry
forward has been provided for as the Company is not profitable.
The Company had tax losses, which arose in Canada of $24,419 and
$879 at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, that are
available indefinitely for offset against future taxable profits
of the company in which the losses arose. The tax loss in Canada
may be deducted in the future only against income and proceeds
of disposition derived from resource properties owned at the
time of the acquisition of control, or the Weymouth well. The
possibility for utilization of this tax position for the period
after the change of control in Ocean Rig on May 14, 2008,
is in practice expired with an amount of $23,540. The tax loss
carry forward per December 31, 2010 therefore only reflects
tax losses after May 14, 2008.
The Company had tax losses, which arose in UK of $249 at
December 31, 2010 that are available indefinitely for
offset against future taxable profits of the company in which
the losses arose. A 100% valuation allowance in the assets
resulting from the loss carry forward has been provided for as
the Company is not profitable.
F-93
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The Companys income tax returns are subject to review and
examination in the various jurisdictions in which the Company
operates. Currently one tax audit is open. The Company may
contest any tax assessment that deviates from its tax filing.
However, this review is not expected to incur any tax payables.
The Company accrues for income tax contingencies that it
believes are more likely than not exposures in accordance with
the provisions of guidance related to accounting for uncertainty
in income taxes.
The Company accrues interest and penalties related to its
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
income tax expense. During the year ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not incur any interest or
penalties. Ocean Rig UDW,
and/or one
of its subsidiaries, filed federal and local tax returns in
several jurisdictions throughout the world. The amount of
current tax benefit recognized during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 from the settlement of
disputes with tax authorities and the expiration of statute of
limitations was insignificant.
Ocean Rig UDW is incorporated in Marshall Island and
headquartered in Cyprus. Some of its subsidiaries are
incorporated and domiciled in Norway, and as such, are in
general subject to Norwegian income tax of 28%. Participation
exemption normally applies to equity investments in the EEA
(European Economic Area) except investments in low-tax
countries. The model may also apply to investments outside of
the EEA (except low-tax countries) to the extent the investment
for the last two years have constituted at least 10% of the
capital and votes in the entity in question. The Norwegian
entities are subject to the Norwegian participation exemption
model which provides that only 3% of dividend income and capital
gains that are received by Norwegian companies are subject to
tax. In effect this gives an effective tax of total income under
the participation exemption for Norwegian companies of 0.84% (3%
x 28%). After a restructuring of the Norwegian entities late in
2009, all Norwegian companies are owned directly by Primelead
Ltd in Cyprus and the participation exemption model is therefore
not relevant for 2010.
The Company has one operating segment which is offshore drilling
operations and this is consistent with management reporting and
decision making. The operating segment is the Companys
primary segment as the Group has only one segment. Therefore,
the company only reports the entity wide information on products
and services, geographical information and major customers.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, all
of the consolidated revenues related to the operations of the
Companys two drilling rigs.
21.1
Products and services
In October 2009, the Leiv Eiriksson commenced the three
year Petrobras contract to drill in the Black Sea. The Petrobras
contract is accounted for as a Well Contract based on the terms
of the contract as described in Note 2 (v). Revenues are
recognized as the wells are drilled and recorded as Service
revenues in the consolidated statement of operations. Leiv
Eiriksson has operated under drilling contracts with Shell
in the North Sea commencing on January 8, 2008 until
October 2009. The Shell contract was accounted for as Term
Contract as described in Note 2 (v). Revenues derived from
the contract are partly accounted for as a lease, where the
lease of the rig is recognized to the statement of operation as
Leasing revenue on a straight line basis over the lease period,
while the drilling services element is recognized in the period
when drilling services are rendered as Service revenue. During
2007, the rig completed the Total contract on September 11,
2007 and underwent its five year class work prior to beginning
the Shell contract. The Total contract was accounted for as a
Term Contract as described for the Shell contract above.
F-94
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
During 2010 and 2009, Eirik Raude worked under the
three-year Tullow Oil contract which commenced in October 2008.
Eirik Raude operated in the US Gulf of Mexico under a
contract with Exxon Mobil from 2007 until October 9, 2008.
Both, the ExxonMobil and the Tullow contracts qualify as Term
Contracts, as described in Note 2 (v). Accounting for the
contract follows the same principles as described for the Shell
contract as outlined above.
As of December 31,2010, the estimated future minimum
revenue is $1,091 million based on 100% earning efficiency
and maximum bonuses. The estimated minimum revenue is
distributed over 2011, 2012 and 2013 with $696 million,
$335 million and $60 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2010, a total of $40,205 of revenue are
deferred and will be recognized as revenue over the remaining
contracts terms. As of December 31, 2009, a total of
$38,400 of revenue was deferred.
See Note 2 (v) for a discussion of Other revenues.
21.2
Geographic segment information for offshore drilling
operations
The revenue shown in the table below is revenue per country
based upon the location that the drilling takes place related to
the Offshore Drilling Operation segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Ghana
|
|
$
|
40,120
|
|
|
|
230,815
|
|
|
$
|
227,649
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,228
|
|
Norway
|
|
|
74,725
|
|
|
|
123,306
|
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
53,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
33,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total leasing and service revenues
|
|
$
|
202,110
|
|
|
|
373,525
|
|
|
$
|
403,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The drilling rigs Leiv Eiriksson and Eirik Raude
constitute the Companys long lived assets. Until
December 22, 2008, the rigs were owned by Norwegian
entities when ownership was transferred to Marshall Island
entities.
21.3
Information about Major customers
Our customers are oil and gas exploration and production
companies, including major integrated oil companies, independent
oil and gas producers and government-owned oil and gas
companies. In the year ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010 our customers have been:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Customer C
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Customer D
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss of any of these significant customers could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations if they
were not replaced by other customers.
F-95
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
|
|
22.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
22.1
Legal proceedings
Various claims, suits, and complaints, including those involving
government regulations and product liability, arise in the
ordinary course of the shipping business.
The Company has obtained insurance for the assessed market value
of the rigs. However, such insurance coverage may not provide
sufficient funds to protect the Company from all liabilities
that could result from its operations in all situations. Risks
against which the Company may not be fully insured or insurable
for include environmental liabilities, which may result from a
blow-out or similar accident, or liabilities resulting from
reservoir damage alleged to have been caused by the negligence
of the Company.
The Companys loss of hire insurance coverage does not
protect against loss of income from day one, but will be
effective after 45 days off-hire. The occurrence of
casualty or loss, against which the Company is not fully
insured, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The insurance covers approximately one year with loss of hire.
As part of our normal course of operations, our customer may
disagree on amounts due to us under the provision of the
contracts which are normally settled though negotiations with
the customer. Disputed amounts are normally reflected in
revenues at such time as we reach agreement with the customer on
the amounts due. Except for the matter discussed below in 22.2,
the Company is not a party to any material litigation where
claims or counterclaims have been filed against the Company
other than routine legal proceedings incidental to our business.
22.2
Potential Angolan Import-/Export duties
Ocean Rigs Leiv Eiriksson operated in Angola in the period
2002 to 2007. Ocean Rig understands that the Angolan government
has retroactively levied import/export duties for two
importation events in the period 2002 to 2007. As Ocean Rig has
formally disputed all claims in relation to the potential duties
and does not believe it is probable that the duties will be
upheld, no provision has been made. The maximum amount is
estimated to be between $5-10 million.
22.3
Purchase obligations:
The following table sets forth the Companys contractual
purchase obligations as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Obligations to Cardiff under management agreements terminated
effective December 21, 2010 (Note 4)
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
Drillships shipbuilding contracts and owner furnished equipment
|
|
|
1,374,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations
|
|
|
1,379,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.4
Rental payments
Ocean Rig entered into a five year office lease agreement with
Vestre Svanholmen 6 AS which commenced on July 1, 2007.
This lease includes an option for an additional five years term
which must be exercised at least six months prior to the end of
the term of the contract which expires in June 2012. As of
December 31, 2010, the future obligations amount to $646
for 2011 and $323 for 2012.
F-96
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
We have evaluated all subsequent events through April 29,
2011, the date the financial statements were available to be
issued.
23.1 On January 3, 2011 the Company took delivery of
its newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Corcovado, the
first to be delivered of the four sister drillship vessels that
are being constructed at Samsung Heavy Industries. In connection
with the delivery of Ocean Rig Corcovado, the final yard
installment of $289.0 million was paid and the pre-delivery
loan from DVB Bank of $115.0 million was repaid in full on
December 22, 2010.
23.2 On January 4, 2011 the Company announced that
it had entered into firm contracts with Cairn Energy PLC for the
Leiv Eiriksson and the Ocean Rig Corcovado for a
period of approximately 6 months each. The total contract
value including mobilization for the Leiv Eiriksson is
approximately $95 million. The mobilization period began in
direct continuation from April 10, 2011, the agreed release
date from the Petrobras contract, and the rig has been earning a
reduced stand-by rate from that date. The total contract value
including mobilization and winterization of the Ocean Rig
Corcovado is approximately $142 million.
23.3 On January 4, 2011 the Company repaid the
$300 million short term overdraft facility with EFG
Eurobank from restricted cash, which was drawn down in full on
December 28, 2010.
23.4 On January 4, 2011 the Company announced that
it had entered into a firm contract with Petrobras Tanzania for
its 3rd drillship newbuilding the Ocean Rig
Poseidon. As part of this agreement the Leiv Eiriksson
will be released early from the existing contract and will
be made available in second quarter 2011. The firm contract
period is for about 600 days plus a mobilization period.
The total contract value including mobilization is
$353 million.
23.5 On January 5, 2011 the Company drew down the
full amount of the $325 million Deutsche Bank term loan
facility, with its subsidiary Drillships Hydra Owners Inc. as
borrower, for the purpose of (i) meeting the ongoing
working capital needs of Drillships Hydra Owners Inc,
(ii) financing the partial repayment of existing debt in
relation to the purchase of the drillship identified as Samsung
Hull 1837, or Ocean Rig Corcovado, and
(iii) financing the payment of the final installment
associated with the purchase of said drillship. Dry Ships Inc.,
Drillships Holdings Inc and Ocean Rig UDW Inc. are joint
guarantors and guarantee all obligations and liabilities of
Drillships Hydra Owners Inc.
23.6 On March 18, 2011, the Company repaid the
second and final $115 million tranche of the predelivery
financing for hulls 1837 and 1838.
23.7 On March 30, 2011, the Company took delivery of
its newbuilding drillship, the Ocean Rig Olympia, the
second to be delivered of the four sister drillship vessels that
are being constructed at Samsung Heavy Industries. The rig has
been earning a mobilization rate under the Vanco contract from
that date.
23.8 On April 18, 2010, pursuant to the drillship
master agreement, the Company exercised the first of its four
newbuilding drillship options and entered into a shipbuilding
contract for drillship NB #1 (TBN) for a total yard cost of
$608 million. The Company paid $207.6 million to the
shipyard in connection with the exercise of the option. Delivery
of this hull is scheduled for July 2013. The estimated total
yard cost of $608 million includes $38 million of
specification upgrades agreed on April 13, 2011, including
a 7 ram BOP, a dual mud system and, with the purchase of
additional equipment, the capability to drill in water depths of
12,000 feet.
23.9 On April 18, 2011, the Company entered into an
$800 million Syndicated Secured Term Loan Facility to
partially finance the construction costs of the Ocean Rig
Corcovado and the Ocean Rig Olympia. This facility
has a five year term and is repayable in 20 quarterly
installments plus a balloon payment payable with the last
installment.
F-97
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statement (Continued)
As of and for periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars
except for share and per share data,
unless otherwise stated)
The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. The facility
is guaranteed by DryShips and Ocean Rig UDW and imposes certain
financial covenants on both entities. On April 20, 2011,
the Company drew down the full amount of this facility and
prepaid its $325 million Bridge Loan Facility.
23.10 During March and April 2011, we borrowed an
aggregate of $175.5 million from DryShips through
shareholder loans for capital expenditures and general corporate
purposes. On April 20, 2011, these intercompany loans were
repaid. As of the date of this proxy
statement / prospectus, no balance exists between us
and DryShips.
23.11 On April 27, 2011, the Company entered into an
agreement with all lenders under the Two $562,000 Loan
Agreements to restructure the Two $562,000 Loan Agreements. The
principal terms of the restructuring are as follows:
(i) the maximum amount permitted to be drawn is reduced
from $562.5 million to $495.0 million under each
facility; (ii) in addition to the guarantee already
provided by DryShips, we provided an unlimited recourse
guarantee that will include certain financial covenants that
will apply quarterly to Ocean Rig UDW; (iii) the Company is
permitted to draw under the facility with respect to the
Ocean Rig Poseidon based upon the employment of the
drillship under its drilling contract with Petrobras Tanzania,
and on April 27, 2010, the cash collateral deposited for
this vessel was released; and (iv) the Company is permitted
to draw under the facility with respect to the Ocean Rig
Mykonos provided the Company has obtained suitable
employment for such drillship no later than August 2011.
23.12 On April 27, 2011, the Company completed the
issuance of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of
9.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016 offered in a private
placement. The net proceeds from the notes offering of
approximately $487.5 million are expected to be used to
finance the Companys newbuilding drillships program and
for general corporate purposes.
23.13 On April 27, 2011, pursuant to the drillship
master agreement, the Company exercised the second of its four
newbuilding drillship options and entered into a shipbuilding
contract for drillship NB #2 (TBN) for a total yard cost of
$608.0 million. The Company paid $207.4 million to the
shipyard in the second quarter of 2011 in connection with the
exercise of the option. Delivery of this hull is scheduled for
September 2013. The estimated total yard cost of
$608.0 million includes $38 million of specification
upgrades agreed on April 27, 2011, including a 7 ram BOP, a
dual mud system and, with the purchase of additional equipment,
the capability to drill in water depths of 12,000 feet.
23.14 On April 27, 2011, and subsequent to the
signing of the Two $562,000 Loan Agreements (see 23.11 above), a
net amount of $88.7 million was released by the lenders to
the Company, which was previously held by the lenders as cash
collateral.
F-98
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (the Company or OCR
UDW) was formed under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands on December 10, 2007, under the name
Primelead Shareholders Inc., and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
DryShips Inc., a publicly traded company whose shares are listed
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
DRYS.
The Companys predecessor, Ocean Rig ASA, was incorporated
on September 26, 1996 under the laws of Norway and operated
two drilling rigs. The Leiv Eiriksson and the Eirik Raude
commenced operations in 2001 and 2002, respectively, under
contracts with oil and gas companies. The shares of Ocean Rig
ASA traded on Oslo Børs from January 1997 to July 2008.
OCR UDW acquired 30.4% of the shares in Ocean Rig ASA (OCR
ASA) on December 20, 2007. The Company acquired
additional shares of Ocean Rig ASA during 2008. After acquiring
more than 33% of Ocean Rig ASAs outstanding shares, the
Company, as required by Norwegian Law, launched a mandatory bid
for the remaining shares of Ocean Rig at a price of NOK 45 per
share ($8.89 per share). The Company gained control over Ocean
Rig ASA on May 14, 2008. Up to May 14, 2008, the
Company recorded its minority share of OCR ASAs results of
operations under the equity method of accounting. The results of
operations related to OCR ASA are consolidated in the financial
statements of OCR UDW starting May 15, 2008. The mandatory
bid expired on June 11, 2008. As of July 10, 2008, the
Company had acquired 100% of the shares in Ocean Rig ASA. During
the period between May 15, 2008 and July 10, 2008, the
Company reflected the minority shareholders interests in net
income of OCR ASA on the line Net income attributable to non
controlling interest in its consolidated statement of
operations. The step acquisition was accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed statement of
operations gives effect to the acquisition of Ocean Rig ASA as
if the transactions had occurred on January 1, 2008. The
unaudited pro forma statement of operations was derived from,
and should be read in conjunction with, the historical
consolidated financial statements of Ocean Rig UDW Inc. for the
period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 and Ocean
Rig ASA for the period January 1, 2008 to May 14, 2008
which are included elsewhere in this proxy
statement / prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed pro forma statement of
operations has been prepared in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) consistent with those used in OCR UDWs
historical consolidated financial statements.
The adjustments reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed
statement of operations are principally related to the pro forma
amortization of the purchase price adjustments to the statement
of operations for the period from January 1, 2008 to
May 14, 2008. These net incremental adjustments are based
upon the fair value from the step acquisition reflected in
Note 5.3 to the consolidated financial statements of OCR
UDW. All pro forma adjustments related to the purchase price
allocation have recurring effects.
The unaudited pro forma condensed statement of operations does
not purport to present the OCR UDW Inc.s results of
operations had the acquisition actually been completed at the
date indicated. In addition, they do not project the OCR
UDWs results of operations for any future period.
F-99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCR UDW
|
|
OCR ASA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/01
|
|
01/01
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
05/14/2008
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Forma
|
|
Condensed Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and service revenues
|
|
|
202,110
|
|
|
|
99,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,282
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
16,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,810
|
(a)
|
|
|
25,363
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
218,663
|
|
|
|
99,172
|
|
|
|
8,810
|
|
|
|
326,645
|
|
Drilling rigs operating expenses
|
|
|
86,229
|
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,373
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,729
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
45,432
|
|
|
|
19,367
|
|
|
|
6,909
|
(b)
|
|
|
71,708
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14,462
|
|
|
|
12,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,602
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
907,852
|
|
|
|
79,651
|
|
|
|
6,909
|
|
|
|
994,412
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(689,189
|
)
|
|
|
19,521
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
(667,767
|
)
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(71,692
|
)
|
|
|
(41,661
|
)
|
|
|
(11,316
|
)(c)
|
|
|
(124,669
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,414
|
|
Gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
Total expenses, net
|
|
|
(70,959
|
)
|
|
|
(41,280
|
)
|
|
|
(11,316
|
)
|
|
|
(123,555
|
)
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(760,148
|
)
|
|
|
(21,759
|
)
|
|
|
(9,415
|
)
|
|
|
(791,322
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(2,844
|
)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
Equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(764,047
|
)
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
(8,360
|
)
|
|
|
(795,803
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to non controlling interest
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(765,847
|
)
|
|
|
(23,396
|
)
|
|
|
(6,560
|
)
|
|
|
(795,803
|
)
|
F-100
OCEAN RIG
UDW INC.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Operations
For the period ended December 31, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars)
Pro Forma
Adjustments and Assumptions
The unaudited pro forma condensed statement of operations give
pro forma effect to the following:
(a) In connection with the acquisition, the Company
acquired drilling contracts for the future contract drilling
services of Ocean Rig ASA, some of which extend through 2011.
These contracts include fixed day rates that were above or below
day rates available as of the acquisition date. After
determining the aggregate fair values of these drilling
contracts as of the acquisition, the Company recorded the
respective contract fair values on the consolidated balance
sheet as non-current liabilities and non-current assets under
Fair value of below/above market acquired time
charters. These are being amortized into revenues using
the straight-line method over the respective contract periods (1
and 3 years for the respective contracts). The pro forma
amount that was amortized to income for the period from
January 1, 2008 to May 15, 2008 amounted to $8,810.
(b) The Company adjusted the carrying value of drilling
rigs, machinery and equipment to its fair value that will be
amortized over their useful life which was determined to be
30 years. Additionally, the Company identified finite-lived
intangible assets associated with the trade names and software
that will be amortized over their useful life which is
determined to be 10 years. The pro forma amount of
incremental depreciation of the fair value adjustment to
drilling rigs, machinery and equipment for the period from
January 1, 2008 to May 15, 2008 amounted to $6,404.
The pro forma amount of amortization for identified finite-lived
intangible assets for the period from January 1, 2008 to
May 15, 2008 amounted to $505. The total pro forma
adjustment for depreciation and amortization for the period from
January 1, 2008 to May 15, 2008 amounted to $6,909.
(c ) On May 9, 2008, the Company concluded a guarantee
facility of NOK 5.0 billion (approximately $974,500) and a
term loan of $800,000 in order to guarantee the purchase price
of the Ocean Rig shares to be acquired through the mandatory
offering, to finance the acquisition cost of the Ocean Rig
shares. The loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a
margin. For purposes of the pro forma information it
is assumed that loan drawn down from January 1, 2008 and
therefore had interest expense for the whole year. The interest
rate assumed was based upon the LIBOR in effect at the actual
acquisition date of May 14, 2008. The total pro forma
adjustment for interest expense for the period from
January 1, 2008 to May 15, 2008 amounted to $11,316.
(d) There were no tax effects on amortization of the fair
values for contracts, amortization and depreciation of tangible
and intangible assets or interest expense because the tax
effects were offset by changes in valuation allowance.
(e) For the period of January 1, 2008 to May 14,
2008, the Company recorded its minority share of OCR ASAs
results of operations under the equity method of accounting on
the line Equity in loss of investee. Since the unaudited pro
forma condensed statement of operations includes 100% of OCR
ASAs results of operations from January 1, 2008 to
May 14, 2008, the minority share in the historical
financial statements is reversed since this would include a
portion of the results twice.
(f) During the period between May 15, 2008 and
July 10, 2008, the Company reflected the minority
shareholders interests in net income of OCR ASA on the line Net
income attributable to non controlling interest in its
consolidated statement of operations. Since the unaudited pro
forma condensed statement of operations includes 100% of OCR
ASAs results of operations as if the acquisition occurred
on January 1, 2008, the non controlling interest in the
historical financial statements is reversed.
F-101
Annex A
Execution
Version
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER,
dated as of July 26, 2011,
among
DRYSHIPS INC.,
PELICAN STOCKHOLDINGS INC.,
and
OCEANFREIGHT INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
Section 1.1.
|
|
|
Certain Definitions
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
ARTICLE II THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
Section 2.1.
|
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
ARTICLE III EFFECT ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT
ENTITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
Section 3.1.
|
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
Section 3.2.
|
|
|
Surrender and Payment
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
Section 3.3.
|
|
|
[Intentionally Omitted]
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 3.4.
|
|
|
Withholding Rights
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 3.5.
|
|
|
Lost Certificates
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
ARTICLE IV [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 5.1.
|
|
|
Organization, Qualification and Corporate Power
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 5.2.
|
|
|
Authorization
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 5.3.
|
|
|
Noncontravention
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 5.4.
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 5.5.
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 5.6.
|
|
|
Indebtedness
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 5.7.
|
|
|
SEC Filings and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
Section 5.8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
Section 5.9.
|
|
|
Disclosure Documents
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
Section 5.10.
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 5.11.
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws; Orders; Permits
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 5.12.
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes; No Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 5.13.
|
|
|
Tangible Personal Assets
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 5.14.
|
|
|
Real Property
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 5.15.
|
|
|
Vessels; Maritime Matters
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 5.16.
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
Section 5.17.
|
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
Section 5.18.
|
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 5.19.
|
|
|
Labor and Employment Matters
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 5.20.
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.21.
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.22.
|
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.23.
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.24.
|
|
|
Takeover Statutes; Rights Plan
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.25.
|
|
|
Interested Party Transactions
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 5.26.
|
|
|
Certain Business Practices
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 5.27.
|
|
|
No Existing Discussions
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 5.28.
|
|
|
No Other Representations or Warranties
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
ARTICLE VI REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER
SUB
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 6.1.
|
|
|
Organization, Qualification and Corporate Power
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 6.2.
|
|
|
Authorization
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 6.3.
|
|
|
Noncontravention
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 6.4.
|
|
|
Disclosure Documents
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 6.5.
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 6.6.
|
|
|
Organization, Qualification and Corporate Power of Ocean Rig
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 6.7.
|
|
|
Capitalization of Ocean Rig
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 6.8.
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.9.
|
|
|
Ocean Rig SEC Filings
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.10.
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 6.11.
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws; Orders; Permits
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 6.12.
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes; No Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 6.13.
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 6.14.
|
|
|
Tangible Personal Assets
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 6.15.
|
|
|
Labor and Employment Matters
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 6.16.
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 6.17.
|
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 6.18.
|
|
|
No Other Representations or Warranties
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
ARTICLE VII CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 7.1.
|
|
|
Operation of the Companys Business
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 7.2.
|
|
|
Operation of Ocean Rigs Business
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 7.3.
|
|
|
[Intentionally Omitted]
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 7.4.
|
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 7.5.
|
|
|
Notice of Developments
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 7.6.
|
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
Section 7.7.
|
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 7.8.
|
|
|
Employee Matters
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 7.9.
|
|
|
Ocean Rig Common Stock
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
ARTICLE VIII COVENANTS OF PARENT
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
Section 8.1.
|
|
|
Obligations of Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
Section 8.2.
|
|
|
Voting of Shares
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
Section 8.3.
|
|
|
Director and Officer Liability
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
Section 8.4.
|
|
|
Stock Exchange Listing
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
ARTICLE IX COVENANTS OF PARENT AND THE COMPANY
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 9.1.
|
|
|
Company Stockholder Meeting; Proxy Statement; Registration
Statement
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 9.2.
|
|
|
Regulatory Undertaking
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
Section 9.3.
|
|
|
Certain Filings
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 9.4.
|
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 9.5.
|
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 9.6.
|
|
|
Stock Exchange De-listing
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 9.7.
|
|
|
Takeover Provisions
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 9.8.
|
|
|
Notices of Certain Events
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
ARTICLE X CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
Section 10.1.
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Each Party
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 10.2.
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Company
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
Section 10.3.
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
ARTICLE XI TERMINATION; AMENDMENT; WAIVER
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
Section 11.1.
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
Section 11.2.
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
ARTICLE XII MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
|
Section 12.1.
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
|
Section 12.2.
|
|
|
Survival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 12.3.
|
|
|
Amendments and Waivers
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 12.4.
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 12.5.
|
|
|
Disclosure Schedules
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 12.6.
|
|
|
Waiver
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 12.7.
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 12.8.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 12.9.
|
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.10.
|
|
|
Counterparts; Effectiveness
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.11.
|
|
|
Entire Agreement
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.12.
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.13.
|
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.14.
|
|
|
Headings
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.15.
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 12.16.
|
|
|
Binding Effect; Benefit; Assignment
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
A-iii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of July 26, 2011
(this Agreement), among DryShips Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands (Parent), Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
the Republic of the Marshall Islands and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent (Merger Sub), and
OceanFreight Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
Republic of the Marshall Islands (the
Company).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, simultaneously herewith, Parent; Basset Holdings Inc.,
Steel Wheel Investments Limited and Haywood Finance Limited
(collectively, the Seller Group); and the
Company are entering into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the
Purchase Agreement), pursuant to which,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, the
Seller Group has agreed to sell to Parent, and Parent has agreed
to purchase from the Seller Group, no sooner than
August 23, 2011 (the Scheduled Seller Group Share
Purchase Date), a total of 3,000,856 shares of
Class A common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, of the
Company (the Company Common Stock) for
consideration per share consisting of (x) $11.25 in cash
and (y) a number of shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock (as
defined below) owned by Parent equal to the Exchange Ratio (the
date on which such purchase is consummated, the Seller
Group Share Purchase Date);
WHEREAS, Parent owns 103,125,500, comprising approximately 78%,
of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value of $0.01
per share (Ocean Rig Common Stock), of Ocean
Rig UDW Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
Republic of the Marshall Islands (Ocean Rig);
WHEREAS, each of the board of directors of the Company (the
Company Board) and a special committee of
independent directors established by the Company Board (the
Special Committee), the board of directors of
the Parent (the Parent Board) (on its own
behalf and as the sole stockholder of Merger Sub) and the board
of directors of Merger Sub (the Merger Sub
Board) has approved the merger of Merger Sub with and
into the Company (the Merger) on the terms
and subject to the conditions provided for in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
representations and warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1. Certain
Definitions.
(a) When used in this Agreement, the following terms will
have the meanings assigned to them in this
Section 1.1(a):
1933 Act means the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
1934 Act means the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Acquisition Proposal means any offer,
proposal or indication of interest by a Third Party relating to
any transaction or series of transactions involving (i) any
acquisition or purchase, direct or indirect, of 15% or more of
the consolidated assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
assets of the Company
and/or any
of its Subsidiaries that represented, individually or in the
aggregate, 15% or more of the consolidated net income or
revenues of the Company for the then most recently completed
four quarter period, or 15% or more of any class of equity or
voting securities of the Company or any one or more of its
Subsidiaries whose assets (or whose net income or revenues for
the then most recently completed four quarter period),
individually or in the aggregate, constitute (or represented)
15% or more of the consolidated assets (or of the consolidated
net income or revenues for the then most recently completed four
quarter period) of the Company, (ii) any tender offer
(including a self-tender offer) or exchange offer that, if
consummated, would result in a Third Party beneficially owning
15% or more of any class of equity or voting securities of the
Company or any one
A-1
or more of its Subsidiaries whose assets (or net income or
revenues for the then most recently completed four quarter
period), individually or in the aggregate, constitute (or
represented) 15% or more of the consolidated assets (or of the
consolidated net income or revenues for the most recently
completed four quarter period) of the Company, or (iii) a
merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
sale of substantially all the assets, reorganization,
recapitalization, liquidation, extraordinary dividend,
dissolution or other similar transaction involving the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries whose assets (or whose net income or
revenues for the then most recently completed four quarter
period), individually or in the aggregate, constitute (or
represented) 15% or more of the consolidated assets (or of the
consolidated net income or revenues for the then most recently
completed four quarter period) of the Company.
Action means any litigation, claim,
action, suit, hearing, proceeding, arbitration, audit,
inspection or other investigation (whether civil, criminal,
administrative, labor or investigative).
Affiliate means, with respect to a
Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, through
one or more intermediaries, Controls, is Controlled by or is
under common Control with, such Person. For purposes of this
definition and as used otherwise in this Agreement,
Control (including the terms Controlled
by and under common Control with) means the
possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or
cause the direction of the management or policies of a Person,
whether through the ownership of securities or partnership or
other ownership interests, as trustee or executor, by Contract
or otherwise.
Applicable Law means, with respect to
any Person, any foreign, supranational, federal, state,
provincial or local law (statutory, common or otherwise),
constitution, treaty, convention, ordinance, code, rule,
regulation, order, injunction, judgment, decree, ruling or other
similar requirement enacted, adopted, promulgated or applied by
a Governmental Authority that is binding upon or applicable to
such Person, as amended unless expressly specified otherwise.
Business Day means (except as
otherwise expressly set forth herein) a day other than Saturday,
Sunday or other day on which commercial banks located in New
York, New York are authorized or required by Applicable Law to
close.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.
Company Balance Sheet means the
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of
December 31, 2010, and the footnotes thereto, set forth in
the Company 20-F.
Company Balance Sheet Date means
December 31, 2010.
Company Benefit Plan means any
employee benefit plan, including any (i) deferred
compensation or retirement plan or arrangement,
(ii) defined contribution retirement plan or arrangement,
(iii) defined benefit retirement plan or arrangement,
(iv) employee welfare benefit plan or material fringe
benefit plan or program, or (v) stock purchase, stock
option, severance pay, employment,
change-in-control,
vacation pay, salary continuation, sick leave, excess benefit,
bonus or other incentive compensation, life insurance, or other
employee benefit plan, contract, program, policy or other
arrangement, under which any present or former employee of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries has any present or future
right to compensation, payments or benefits sponsored or
maintained or contributed to by the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company.
Company Disclosure Schedule means the
disclosure schedule dated the date hereof regarding this
Agreement that has been provided by the Company to Parent and
Merger Sub.
Company Material Adverse Effect means
(i) a material adverse effect on the financial condition,
business, assets (including Vessels), liabilities or results of
operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, excluding any effect resulting from (A) changes in
Applicable Law or GAAP, (B) changes in the global financial
or securities markets or general global economic or political
conditions, (C) changes or conditions generally affecting
the industry in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate,
(D) acts of war, sabotage or terrorism or natural
disasters, or (E) other than for purposes of
Section 5.3 and Section 5.18(g), the
announcement or consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and the Purchase Agreement; provided that
the effect of any matter referred to in clauses (A), (B), (C),
or (D) shall only be excluded to the extent that such
matter does not disproportionately affect the Company and its
Subsidiaries,
A-2
taken as a whole, relative to other entities operating in the
industry in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate, or
(ii) any event, circumstance or effect that materially
impairs the ability of the Company to perform its obligations
under this Agreement or materially delays the consummation of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Company 20-F means the Companys
annual report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, in the form
publicly filed by the Company with the SEC prior to the date
hereof.
Contract means any contract,
agreement, note, bond, indenture, mortgage, guarantee, option,
lease, license, sales or purchase order, warranty, commitment or
other instrument, obligation or binding arrangement or
understanding of any kind, whether written or oral.
Environmental Laws means Applicable
Laws, any agreement with any Governmental Authority and Maritime
Guidelines relating to human health and safety, the environment
or to pollutants, contaminants, wastes or chemicals or any
toxic, radioactive, ignitable, corrosive, reactive or otherwise
hazardous substances, wastes or materials.
Exchange Ratio means 0.52326.
GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States.
Governmental Authority means any
entity or body exercising executive, legislative, judicial,
regulatory or administrative functions of or pertaining to
United States federal, state or local government or other
non-United
States (including the Marshall Islands), international,
multinational or other government, including any department,
commission, board, agency, instrumentality, political
subdivision, bureau, official or other regulatory,
administrative or judicial authority thereof and any self
regulatory organization.
Governmental Authorizations means,
with respect to any Person, all licenses, permits (including
construction permits), certificates, waivers, consents,
franchises, exemptions, variances, expirations and terminations
of any waiting period requirements and other authorizations and
approvals issued to such Person by or obtained by such Person
from any Governmental Authority, or of which such Person has the
benefit under any Applicable Law.
Indebtedness means, with respect to
any Person, without duplication, any (i) obligation of such
Person with respect to any indebtedness for borrowed money
(including all obligations for principal, interest, premiums,
penalties, fees, expenses and breakage costs),
(ii) obligation of such Person with respect to any
indebtedness evidenced by any bond, debenture, note, mortgage,
indenture or other debt instrument or debt security (including
all obligations for principal, interest, premiums, penalties,
fees, expenses and breakage costs), (iii) commitments of
such Person for which it assures a financial institution against
loss (including contingent reimbursement obligations with
respect to bankers acceptances or letters of credit),
(iv) liability of such Person with respect to interest rate
or currency exchange swaps, collars, caps or similar hedging
obligations, and (v) responsibility or liability of such
Person directly or indirectly as obligor, guarantor, surety or
otherwise of any of the foregoing.
Knowledge of Parent or any similar
phrase means the knowledge of the following persons: Pankaj
Khanna, George Economou and Ziad Nakhleh.
Knowledge of the Company or any
similar phrase means the knowledge of the following persons:
Antonis Kandylidis, Demetris Nenes and Solon Dracoulis.
Law means any statute, law, ordinance,
rule or regulation of any Governmental Authority.
Lien means, with respect to any
property or asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, hypothecation,
charge, security interest, infringement, interference, right of
first refusal, right of first offer, preemptive right, option,
community property right or other adverse claim or encumbrance
of any kind in respect of such property or asset.
Maritime Guidelines means any United
States, international or
non-United
States (including the Marshall Islands and Greece) rule, code of
practice, convention, protocol, guideline or similar requirement
or
A-3
restriction concerning or relating to a Vessel, and to which a
Vessel, is subject and required to comply with, imposed,
published or promulgated by any relevant Governmental Authority,
the International Maritime Organization, such Vessels
classification society or the insurer(s) of such Vessel.
Material Contracts means each Contract
set forth on, or required to be set forth on,
Section 5.16(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
Nasdaq means the NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC.
Newbuildings means vessels under
construction or newly constructed for the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, other than Owned Vessels.
Ocean Rig Balance Sheet means the
consolidated balance sheet of Ocean Rig as of December 31,
2010, and the footnotes thereto, set forth in the Ocean Rig
Disclosure Document.
Ocean Rig Balance Sheet Date means
December 31, 2010.
Ocean Rig Disclosure Document means
the confidential draft disclosure document regarding Ocean Rig.
Ocean Rig Material Adverse Effect
means (i) a material adverse effect on the financial
condition, business, assets, liabilities or results of
operations of Ocean Rig and Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, excluding any effect resulting from (A) changes
in Applicable Law or GAAP, (B) changes in the global
financial or securities markets or general global economic or
political conditions, (C) changes or conditions generally
affecting the industry in which the Company and its Subsidiaries
operate, (D) acts of war, sabotage or terrorism or natural
disasters, or (E) the announcement or consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Purchase
Agreement; provided that the effect of any matter
referred to in clauses (A), (B), (C), or (D) shall only be
excluded to the extent that such matter does not
disproportionately affect Ocean Rig and Ocean Rigs
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to other entities
operating in the industry in which Ocean Rig and Ocean
Rigs Subsidiaries operate.
Ocean Rig Permitted Liens means
(i) Liens disclosed on the Ocean Rig Balance Sheet,
(ii) Liens for Taxes that are not yet due and payable or
that may hereafter be paid without material penalty or that are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings (and
for which adequate accruals or reserves have been established on
the Ocean Rig Balance Sheet), (iii) statutory Liens of
landlords and workers, carriers and mechanics
or other like Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practices for amounts that are not yet due
and payable or that are being contested in good faith, or
(iii) Liens and encroachments which do not materially
interfere with the present or proposed use of the properties or
assets to which such Lien relates.
Order means any award, injunction,
judgment, decree, order, ruling, subpoena or verdict or other
decision issued, promulgated or entered by or with any
Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction.
Parent Material Adverse Effect means
any event, circumstance or effect that (a) materially
impairs the ability of Parent or Merger Sub to perform its
obligations under this Agreement, or (b) materially delays
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
Per Share Merger Consideration means
cash equal to $11.25 and a number of shares of Ocean Rig Common
Stock owned by Parent equal to the Exchange Ratio;
provided, however, that, if the Closing shall
occur at any time after the Share Condition Waiver Time, the
term Per Share Merger Consideration shall
mean cash equal to $22.50.
Permit means any authorization,
approval, consent, easement, variance, exception, accreditation,
certificate, license, permit or franchise of or from any
Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction or pursuant to
any Law.
Permitted Liens means (i) Liens
disclosed on the Company Balance Sheet, (ii) Liens for
Taxes that are not yet due and payable or that are being
contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings (and for
which adequate accruals or reserves have been established on the
Company Balance Sheet), (iii) statutory Liens of
A-4
landlords and workers, carriers and mechanics
or other like Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practices for amounts that are not yet due
and payable or that are being contested in good faith,
(iv) Liens and encroachments which do not materially
interfere with the present or proposed use of the properties or
assets to which such Lien relates, or (v) other maritime
liens, charges and encumbrances incidental to the conduct of the
business of each such party, the ownership of any such
partys property and assets and which do not in the
aggregate materially detract from the value of each such
partys property or assets or materially impair the use
thereof in the operation of its business.
Person means an individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, a trust, an
unincorporated association, or other entity or organization,
including a Governmental Authority.
Representatives means, with respect to
any Person, the respective directors, officers, employees,
counsel, accountants, agents, advisors and other representatives
of such Person.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act means the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SEC means the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Share Condition Waiver Time means 5:30
pm New York time on January 26, 2012 so long as at such
time all of the conditions to the obligations of the parties set
forth in Article X (other than the conditions set
forth in Section 10.1(c)) that are required by their
terms to be satisfied shall be then satisfied or waived. In the
event all of the conditions to the obligations of the parties
set forth in Article X (other than the conditions
set forth in Section 10.1(c)) that are required by
their terms to be satisfied shall not be then satisfied or
waived, the Share Condition Waiver Time shall
be the first time thereafter at which all of the conditions to
the obligations of the parties set forth in
Article X (other than the conditions set forth in
Section 10.1(c)) that are required by their terms to
be satisfied shall be satisfied or waived.
Subsidiary means, with respect to any
Person, any corporation, limited liability company, partnership,
joint venture or other legal entity of which such Person (either
alone or through or together with any other Subsidiary), owns,
directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the stock or other
equity interests, the holders of which are generally entitled to
vote for the election of the board of directors or other
governing body of a non-corporate Person.
Tax Returns means any return,
declaration, report, claim for refund, election, disclosure,
estimate or information return or statement relating to Taxes,
including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any
amendment thereof.
Taxes means all federal, state, local
and foreign income, profits, franchise, gross receipts,
environmental, customs duty, capital stock, severance, stamp,
payroll, sales, transfer, employment, unemployment, disability,
use, property, withholding, excise, production, value added,
occupancy and other taxes, duties or assessments of any nature
whatsoever (whether payable directly or by withholding and
whether or not requiring the filing of a Tax Return), including
all estimated taxes, deficiency assessments, additions to tax,
penalties and interest, whether disputed or not and including
any obligations to indemnify or otherwise assume or succeed to
the Tax liability of any other Person.
Third Party means any Person,
including as defined in Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act,
other than Parent or any of its Affiliates.
Vessels means Owned Vessels and Leased
Vessels.
(b) For purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise
expressly provided herein or unless the context otherwise
requires: (i) the meaning assigned to each term defined
herein will be equally applicable to both the singular and the
plural forms of such term and vice versa, and words denoting any
gender will include all genders as the context requires;
(ii) where a word or phrase is defined herein, each of its
other grammatical forms will have a corresponding meaning;
(iii) the terms hereof, herein,
hereunder, hereby and
herewith and words of similar import will, unless
otherwise stated, be construed to refer to this Agreement as a
whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement;
(iv) when a reference is made in this Agreement to an
Article, Section, paragraph, Exhibit or Schedule without
reference to a document, such reference is to an Article,
Section, paragraph,
A-5
Exhibit or Schedule to this Agreement; (v) a reference to a
subsection without further reference to a Section is a reference
to such subsection as contained in the same Section in which the
reference appears, and this rule will also apply to paragraphs
and other subdivisions; (vi) the word include,
includes or including when used in this
Agreement will be deemed to include the words without
limitation, unless otherwise specified; (vii) a
reference to any party to this Agreement or any other agreement
or document will include such partys predecessors,
successors and permitted assigns; (viii) a reference to any
Law means such Law as amended, modified, codified, replaced or
reenacted, and all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;
(ix) all accounting terms used and not defined herein have
the respective meanings given to them under GAAP; and
(x) any references in this Agreement to dollars
or $ shall be to U.S. dollars.
(c) Additional Terms. Each of the following terms is
defined in the Section set forth opposite such term:
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
Section 7.6(a)
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Articles of Merger
|
|
Section 2.1(c)
|
Certificates
|
|
Section 3.2(a)
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
Section 5.4(a)
|
Closing
|
|
Section 2.1(b)
|
Closing Date
|
|
Section 2.1(b)
|
Company
|
|
Preamble
|
Company Board
|
|
Recitals
|
Company Board Recommendation
|
|
Section 5.2(b)
|
Company Charter Documents
|
|
Section 5.1
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
Recitals
|
Company Disclosure Documents
|
|
Section 5.9(a)
|
Company Rights
|
|
Section 5.4(a)
|
Company SEC Documents
|
|
Section 5.7(a)
|
Company Securities
|
|
Section 5.4(d)
|
Company Stockholder Approval
|
|
Section 5.2(a)
|
Company Stockholders Meeting
|
|
Section 9.1(d)
|
Company Subsidiary Securities
|
|
Section 5.5(c)
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
Section 7.4
|
D&O Insurance
|
|
Section 8.3(c)
|
Effective Time
|
|
Section 2.1(c)
|
Employment-Related Closing Payments
|
|
Section 7.8(b)
|
End Date
|
|
Section 11.1(b)
|
ERISA
|
|
Section 5.18(e)
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
Section 3.2(a)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
Section 3.2(a)
|
Form F-4
|
|
Section 9.1(a)
|
Indemnified Person
|
|
Section 8.3(a)
|
Interested Party Transaction
|
|
Section 5.25
|
Internal Controls
|
|
Section 5.7(e)
|
Intervening Event
|
|
Section 7.6(b)
|
Leased Vessels
|
|
Section 5.15(a)
|
Material Company Breach
|
|
Section 11.1(f)
|
Material Company Breach of Covenant
|
|
Section 11.1(f)
|
A-6
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Material Parent Breach
|
|
Section 11.1(e)
|
Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
Merger Sub
|
|
Preamble
|
Merger Sub Board
|
|
Recitals
|
MIBCA
|
|
Section 2.1(a)
|
Non-Compete Arrangement
|
|
Section 5.16(a)
|
Notice Period
|
|
Section 7.6(b)
|
Ocean Rig
|
|
Recitals
|
Ocean Rig Common Stock
|
|
Recitals
|
Ocean Rig Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 6.7(a)
|
Ocean Rig SEC Documents
|
|
Section 6.9(a)
|
Ocean Rig Securities
|
|
Section 6.7(d)
|
Ocean Rig Subsidiary Securities
|
|
Section 6.8(b)
|
Owned Vessels
|
|
Section 5.15(a)
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent Board
|
|
Recitals
|
Policies
|
|
Section 5.21
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 5.4(a)
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 9.1(a)
|
Purchase Agreement
|
|
Recitals
|
Real Property Leases
|
|
Section 5.14(b)
|
Rights Plan
|
|
Section 5.4(a)
|
Scheduled Seller Group Share Purchase Date
|
|
Recitals
|
Seller Group
|
|
Recitals
|
Seller Group Share Purchase Date
|
|
Recitals
|
Special Committee
|
|
Recitals
|
Special Committee Recommendation
|
|
Section 5.2(b)
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 7.6(d)
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
Section 2.1(a)
|
Termination Fee
|
|
Section 12.4(b)
|
ARTICLE II
THE MERGER
Section 2.1. The
Merger.
(a) The Merger. At the Effective
Time and upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this
Agreement and in accordance with the Marshall Islands Business
Corporations Act (the MIBCA), Merger Sub
shall be merged with and into the Company. Following the Merger,
the separate existence of Merger Sub will cease and the Company
will continue its corporate existence under the MIBCA as the
surviving corporation in the Merger (the Surviving
Corporation).
(b) Closing. Subject to the
provisions of Article X, the closing of the Merger
(the Closing) shall take place in New York
City at the offices of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &
Jacobson LLP, One New York Plaza, New York, NY 10004 as soon as
possible, but in any event no later than three (3) Business
Days after the date the conditions set forth in
Article X (other than conditions that by their
nature are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the
satisfaction or, to the extent permissible, waiver of those
conditions at the Closing) have been satisfied or, to the
A-7
extent permissible, waived by the party or parties entitled to
the benefit of such conditions, or at such other place, at such
other time or on such other date as Parent and the Company may
mutually agree. The date on which the Closing actually takes
place is referred to as the Closing Date.
(c) Effective Time. At the
Closing, the Company and Merger Sub shall cause to be filed
articles of merger (the Articles of Merger)
with the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of Corporations of the
Marshall Islands and make all other filings or recordings
required by the MIBCA in connection with the Merger. The Merger
shall become effective at such time as the Articles of Merger
are duly filed with the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of
Corporations of the Marshall Islands (or at such later time as
may be mutually agreed upon by Parent, Merger Sub and the
Company and specified in the Articles of Merger in accordance
with the MIBCA) (the time the Merger becomes effective, the
Effective Time).
(d) Effects of the Merger. The
Merger will have the effects set forth in this Agreement and in
the MIBCA. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing and
subject thereto, at the Effective Time, all the properties,
rights, privileges, immunities, powers and purposes of the
Company and Merger Sub shall vest in the Surviving Corporation
and all liabilities, obligations and penalties of the Company
and Merger Sub shall become the debts, obligations, liabilities,
restrictions and duties of the Surviving Corporation.
(e) Articles of Incorporation. At
the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger, the articles of
incorporation of the Company shall be amended so as to read in
its entirety as the articles of incorporation of Merger Sub,
until thereafter amended in accordance with such articles of
incorporation and Applicable Law.
(f) By-Laws. The Company Board
shall take such action as is necessary so that, at the Effective
Time, the bylaws of the Merger Sub in effect immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be the bylaws of the Surviving
Corporation until amended in accordance with Applicable Law.
(g) Directors. The Company Board
shall take such action as is necessary so that, at the Effective
Time, the directors of Surviving Corporation shall be such
persons as shall be designated by Parent prior to the Effective
Time.
(h) Officers. The Company Board
shall take such action as is necessary so that, at the Effective
Time, the officers of Surviving Corporation shall be such
persons as shall be designated by Parent prior to the Effective
Time.
ARTICLE III
EFFECT ON
THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT ENTITIES;
EXCHANGE OF
CERTIFICATES
Section 3.1. Effect
on Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by
virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the
Company, Parent, Merger Sub or the holder of any shares of
Company Common Stock or shares of common stock of Merger Sub:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in
Section 3.1(b) or Section 3.1(c), each
share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of Merger Sub, Parent, the
Company or the holder thereof, be converted into the right to
receive the Per Share Merger Consideration, less any applicable
withholding Taxes. As of the Effective Time, all such shares of
Company Common Stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall
automatically be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist,
and shall thereafter represent only the right to receive the Per
Share Merger Consideration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if,
between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, the
outstanding shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock or the shares of
Company Common Stock shall have changed into a different number
of shares or a different class by reason of any stock dividend,
subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split or stock
combination then, the Exchange Ratio shall be correspondingly
adjusted to reflect such stock dividend, subdivision,
reclassification, recapitalization, split or stock combination.
(b) Each share of Company Common Stock held by the Company
as treasury stock or owned by Parent or Merger Sub immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall be canceled, and no payment
shall be made with respect thereto.
A-8
(c) Each share of Company Common Stock held by Parent or
any Subsidiary of either the Company or Parent immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be canceled, and no payment shall be
made with respect thereto.
(d) Each share of common stock of Merger Sub outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into
and become one share of common stock of the Surviving
Corporation with the same rights, powers and privileges as the
shares so converted and shall constitute the only outstanding
shares of capital stock of the Surviving Corporation.
Section 3.2. Surrender
and Payment.
(a) Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall appoint a
bank or trust company or similar entity reasonably acceptable to
the Company which is authorized to exercise corporate trust or
stock powers to act as Exchange Agent in the Merger (the
Exchange Agent) for the purpose of exchanging
for the Per Share Merger Consideration certificate or
certificates that immediately prior to the Effective Time
represented outstanding shares of Company Common Stock (the
Certificates). Parent shall deliver to the
Exchange Agent for the benefit of the holders of shares of
Company Common Stock for exchange in accordance with this
Article III the appropriate amount of cash and
certificates representing the appropriate number of shares of
Ocean Rig Common Stock, if any, payable pursuant to
Section 3.1 hereof (such cash and shares of Ocean
Rig Common Stock, if any, the Exchange Fund),
in exchange for outstanding shares of Company Common Stock.
(b) As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, the
Exchange Agent shall mail to each holder of Certificates whose
shares of Company Common Stock were converted into the right to
receive the Per Share Merger Consideration, pursuant to
Section 3.1 hereof: (i) a letter of transmittal
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected and risk of
loss and title to the certificates shall be effected and risk of
loss and title to the Certificates shall pass only upon delivery
of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent and shall be in such
form and have such other customary provisions as Parent and the
Company may reasonably specify), and (ii) instructions for
use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange
for the Per Share Merger Consideration. Upon surrender of a
Certificate for cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together
with such letter of transmittal duly executed, the holder of
such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange
therefor a check representing the cash consideration to which
such holder may be entitled and a certificate representing that
number of whole shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock, if any, and
the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. If
any portion of the Per Share Merger Consideration is to be paid
to a Person other than the Person in whose name the surrendered
Certificate is registered, it shall be a condition to such
payment that (i) either such Certificate shall be properly
endorsed or shall otherwise be in proper form for transfer, and
(ii) the Person requesting such payment shall pay to the
Exchange Agent any transfer or other Taxes required as a result
of such payment to a Person other than the registered holder of
such Certificate or establish to the satisfaction of the
Exchange Agent that such Tax has been paid or is not payable.
Until surrendered as contemplated by this
Section 3.2, each Certificate shall be deemed at any
time after the Effective Time to represent only the right of the
holder thereof to receive upon such surrender cash and the Per
Share Merger Consideration to which such holder is entitled as
contemplated by this Section 3.2.
(c) No dividends or other distributions declared or made
after the Effective Time with respect to shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time shall
be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate with
respect to the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock represented
thereby, if any, and no cash payment shall be paid to any such
holder, until the holder of record of such Certificate shall
surrender such Certificate. Subject to the effect of Applicable
Laws, following surrender of any such Certificate there shall be
paid to the record holder of the Certificates representing whole
shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock delivered in exchange therefore
without interest (i) the amount of cash payable hereunder
in respect of the shares of Company Common Stock represented by
such Certificate and the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time
theretofore paid with respect to such number of whole shares of
Ocean Rig Common Stock, and (ii) at the appropriate payment
date the amount of dividends or other distributions with a
record date after the Effective Time but prior to the surrender
and a payment date subsequent to surrender payable with respect
to such whole shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock.
A-9
(d) All cash and shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock delivered
upon the surrender for exchange of shares of Company Common
Stock in accordance with the terms hereof shall be deemed to
have been delivered in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to such shares of Company Common Stock.
(e) No fractions of a share of Ocean Rig Common Stock shall
be paid in the Merger, but in lieu thereof each holder of shares
of Company Common Stock otherwise entitled to a fraction of a
share of Ocean Rig Common Stock shall upon surrender of his or
her Certificate or Certificates be entitled to receive an amount
of cash (without interest) determined by multiplying $21.50 by
the fractional share interest to which such holder would
otherwise be entitled. The parties acknowledge that payment of
the cash consideration in lieu of delivering fractional shares
was not separately bargained for consideration, but merely
represents a mechanical rounding off for purposes of simplifying
the corporate and accounting complexities that would otherwise
be caused by the delivery of fractional shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock.
(f) After the Effective Time, there shall be no further
registration of transfers of shares of Company Common Stock. If,
after the Effective Time, Certificates are presented to the
Surviving Corporation, they shall be canceled and exchanged for
the Per Share Merger Consideration provided for, and in
accordance with the procedures set forth in, this
Article III, except as otherwise required by
Applicable Law.
(g) Any portion of the cash or shares of Ocean Rig Common
Stock comprising the Exchange Fund made available to the
Exchange Agent pursuant to Section 3.2(a) (and any
interest or other income earned thereon) that remains unclaimed
by the holders of shares of Company Common Stock six months
after the Effective Time shall be returned to Parent, upon
demand, and any such holder who has not exchanged such shares of
Company Common Stock for the Per Share Merger Consideration in
accordance with this Section 3.2 prior to that time
shall thereafter look only to Parent for payment of the Per
Share Merger Consideration in respect of such shares of Company
Common Stock without any interest thereon.
(h) Neither Parent nor the Company shall be liable to any
holder of shares of Company Common Stock for cash or shares of
Ocean Rig Common Stock (including dividends or distributions
with respect thereto) from the Exchange Fund delivered to a
public official pursuant to and as required by any applicable
abandoned property, escheat or similar law.
(i) The Exchange Agent shall invest any cash in the
Exchange Fund as directed by Parent. Any interest and other
income resulting from such investments shall be paid to Parent.
Section 3.3. [Intentionally
Omitted]
Section 3.4. Withholding
Rights. Notwithstanding any provision
contained herein to the contrary, each of the Exchange Agent,
the Surviving Corporation and Parent shall be entitled to deduct
and withhold from any consideration otherwise payable under this
Agreement to any Person such amounts as it is required to deduct
and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under
the Code, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder or
any provision of applicable state, local or foreign Law and
shall timely pay such withholding amount to the appropriate
Governmental Authority. If the Exchange Agent, the Surviving
Corporation or Parent, as the case may be, so withholds amounts,
such amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement
as having been paid to such Person in respect of which the
Exchange Agent, the Surviving Corporation or Parent, as the case
may be, made such deduction and withholding.
Section 3.5. Lost
Certificates. If any Certificate shall have
been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the Person claiming such Certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed (in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to the Surviving Corporation) and, if required by
the Surviving Corporation, the posting by such Person of a bond,
in such reasonable amount as the Surviving Corporation may
direct, as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
it or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, with respect to
such Certificate, the Exchange Agent shall pay, in exchange for
such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate, the Per Share Merger
Consideration to be paid in respect of the shares of Company
Common Stock represented by such Certificate, as contemplated by
this Article III.
A-10
ARTICLE IV
[INTENTIONALLY
OMITTED]
ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
Except as set forth in reasonable detail in the Company
Disclosure Schedule or accurately disclosed in any report,
schedule, form or document filed with, or furnished to, the SEC
by the Company and publicly available on or after
January 1, 2010 (other than any risk factor disclosure or
forward-looking statements disclosing potential adverse future
developments included in such reports, schedules, forms or
documents), the Company represents and warrants to Parent and
Merger Sub that:
Section 5.1. Organization,
Qualification and Corporate Power. The
Company is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in
good standing under the Laws of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands, and has all requisite corporate power and authority and
all Governmental Authorizations, directly or indirectly, to own,
lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as it is now being conducted. The Company is duly
qualified or licensed as a foreign corporation to do business,
and is in good standing (where applicable) or has equivalent
status, in each jurisdiction where the character of its
properties or assets owned, leased or operated by it or the
nature of its activities makes such qualification or licensing
necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified or
licensed and in good standing or to have equivalent status has
not had and would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect. The Company has heretofore made available to Parent true
and complete copies of the articles of incorporation and bylaws
of the Company (the Company Charter
Documents) as currently in effect.
Section 5.2. Authorization.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by the Company
of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the
transactions contemplated hereby are within the Companys
corporate powers and, except for the approval of the
Companys stockholders in connection with the consummation
of the Merger, have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of the Company. The affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Company Common Stock is the only vote of the holders of any of
the Companys capital stock necessary in connection with
the transactions contemplated hereby (the Company
Stockholder Approval). This Agreement constitutes a
valid and binding agreement of the Company enforceable against
the Company in accordance with its terms.
(b) At a meeting duly called and held, the Special
Committee has (i) unanimously determined that this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including
the Merger, are fair to and in the best interests of the Company
and the Companys stockholders (other than Parent, Merger
Sub, and the Seller Group), (ii) unanimously approved,
adopted and declared advisable this Agreement and the Purchase
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby,
including the Merger, (iii) unanimously recommended that
the adoption of this Agreement be submitted to the Company
Stockholder Meeting to consummate the Merger under the MIBCA,
and (iv) unanimously adopted the recommendation by the
Special Committee for approval and adoption of this Agreement by
the stockholders of the Company (such recommendation, the
Special Committee Recommendation) (subject to
Section 7.6(b)), which resolutions have not been
subsequently rescinded, modified or amended in any respect
except to the extent occurring after the date of this Agreement.
At a meeting duly called and held, the Company Board has
(i) unanimously determined that this Agreement and the
Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby, including the Merger, are fair to and in the best
interests of the Company and the Companys stockholders
(other than Parent, Merger Sub, and the Seller Group),
(ii) unanimously approved, adopted and declared advisable
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby,
including the Merger, (iii) unanimously directed that the
adoption of this Agreement be submitted to the Company
Stockholder Meeting, to consummate the Merger under the MIBCA,
and (iv) unanimously adopted the recommendation by the
Company Board for approval and adoption of this Agreement by the
stockholders of the Company (such recommendation, the
Company Board Recommendation) (subject to
Section 7.6(b)), which resolutions have not been
subsequently rescinded, modified or amended in any respect
except to the extent occurring after the date of this Agreement.
A-11
(c) The execution, delivery and performance by the Company
of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the
transactions contemplated hereby require no action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any Governmental Authority, other
than (i) the filing and recordation of appropriate merger
or other documents as required by the MIBCA and by relevant
authorities of other jurisdictions in which the Company is
qualified to do business (including the Articles of Merger),
(ii) compliance with any applicable requirements of the
1933 Act, the 1934 Act, any other applicable
U.S. state or federal securities laws and the rules and
requirements of Nasdaq, and (iii) any actions or filings
the absence of which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect.
Section 5.3. Noncontravention. Except
as set forth in Section 5.3 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, the execution, delivery and performance by the
Company of this Agreement and the Purchase Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby
do not and will not (i) violate any provision of the
articles of incorporation or bylaws (or comparable organization
documents, as applicable) of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, (ii) assuming compliance with the matters
referred to in Section 5.2(c), contravene, conflict
with or result in a violation or breach of any provision of any
Applicable Law, (iii) assuming compliance with the matters
referred to in Section 5.2(c), require any consent
or other action by any Person under, constitute a default, or an
event that, with or without notice or lapse of time or both,
would constitute a default under, or cause or permit the
termination, cancellation, acceleration or other change of any
right or obligation or the loss of any benefit of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries under any provision of any agreement or
other Contract binding upon the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any Governmental Authorization of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, (iv) result in the loss of, or
creation or imposition of any Lien on, any asset of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, or (v) result in a violation or
breach of, conflict with, constitute a default under or
otherwise violate any Material Contract, except in the case of
clauses (ii) through (v) to the extent that any such
violation has not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 5.4. Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of
(i) 333,333,333 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 10,000,000 shares of Class B common stock,
par value $0.01 per share (Class B Common
Stock), and (iii) 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (Preferred
Stock), a portion of which the Company has reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of rights distributed to the
holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Second Amended
and Restated Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated as of
April 8, 2011, by and between the Company and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as rights
agent (the Rights Plan) (the rights issued to
the holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Rights Plan
are referred to as the Company Rights). As of
the date of this Agreement, (i) 5,946,182 shares of
Company Common Stock (including 3,334 shares of restricted
Company Common Stock) are issued and outstanding, and
(ii) no shares of Company Common Stock are held in the
treasury of the Company. No shares of Class B Common Stock
or Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. All outstanding
shares of capital stock of the Company have been duly authorized
and validly issued and fully paid and nonassessable, and are
free of preemptive or similar rights under any provision of the
MIBCA and the Company Charter Documents or any agreement to
which the Company is a party or otherwise bound.
(b) [Intentionally Omitted]
(c) There is no outstanding Indebtedness of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries having the right to vote (or convertible
into or exchangeable for securities having the right to vote) on
any matters on which stockholders of the Company may vote.
(d) Except as set forth in this Section 5.4,
there are no issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding
(i) shares of capital stock of or other voting securities
of or ownership interests in the Company, (ii) securities
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other
voting securities of or ownership interests in the Company,
(iii) warrants, calls, options or other rights to acquire
from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or other obligation
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, any capital
stock or other voting securities or ownership interests in or
any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable
for capital stock or other voting securities or ownership
interests in the Company, or (iv) restricted shares, stock
appreciation rights, performance units, contingent value rights,
phantom stock or similar securities
A-12
or rights that are derivative of, or provide economic benefits
based, directly or indirectly, on the value or price of, any
capital stock or voting securities of the Company (the items in
clauses (i) through (iv) being referred to
collectively as the Company Securities).
There are no outstanding obligations of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
of the Company Securities. The Company and its Subsidiaries are
not a party to any voting agreements, voting trusts, proxies or
other similar agreements or understandings with respect to the
voting of any shares of Company Common Stock or other Company
Securities. Except as may be required by applicable securities
laws and regulations, the Company and its Subsidiaries are not
bound by any obligations or commitments of any character
restricting the transfer of, or requiring the registration for
sale of, any shares of Company Common Stock or other Company
Securities.
(e) Except as set forth in this Section 5.4,
none of (i) the shares of Company Common Stock, or
(ii) any Company Securities is owned by any Subsidiary of
the Company.
Section 5.5. Subsidiaries.
(a) Section 5.5(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule sets forth a complete and correct list of each
Subsidiary of the Company, together with the jurisdiction of
incorporation or formation of each such Subsidiary, the form of
organization of each such Subsidiary, the authorized and issued
capital stock or other ownership interest of each such
Subsidiary and the name of each holder thereof.
(b) Each Subsidiary of the Company has been duly organized,
is validly existing and in good standing (except with respect to
jurisdictions that do not recognize the concept of good
standing) under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its
incorporation or formation, and has all requisite power,
Governmental Authorizations and authority to own, lease and
operate its properties and to carry on its business as now
conducted, except where the failure to be in good standing or
possess such Governmental Authorizations would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Each such Subsidiary of the Company is
duly qualified or licensed as a foreign corporation to do
business, and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the
character of its properties or assets owned, leased or operated
by it or the nature of its activities makes such qualification
or licensing necessary, except where the failure to be so
qualified or licensed and in good standing has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) All of the outstanding shares of capital stock of, or
voting securities of, or other ownership interests in, each
Subsidiary of the Company, are owned by the Company directly or
indirectly, free and clear of any Liens (other than Permitted
Liens). There are no issued, reserved for issuance or
outstanding (i) securities of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries convertible into, or exchangeable or exercisable
for, shares of capital stock or other voting securities of, or
ownership interests in, any Subsidiary of the Company,
(ii) warrants, calls, options or other rights to acquire
from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or other
obligations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to issue,
any capital stock or other voting securities of, or ownership
interests in, or any securities convertible into, or
exchangeable or exercisable for, any capital stock or other
voting securities of, or ownership interests in, any Subsidiary
of the Company, or (iii) restricted shares, stock
appreciation rights, performance units, contingent value rights,
phantom stock or similar securities or rights that
are derivative of, or provide economic benefits based, directly
or indirectly, on the value or price of, any capital stock or
other voting securities of, or ownership interests in, any
Subsidiary of the Company (the items in clauses (i) through
(iii), together with all of the outstanding capital stock of, or
other voting securities of, or ownership interests in, each
Subsidiary of the Company, being referred to collectively as the
Company Subsidiary Securities). Neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries owns, directly or
indirectly, any equity or other ownership interests in any
Person, except for the Subsidiaries of the Company. There are no
outstanding obligations of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of
the Company Subsidiary Securities. The Company is not subject to
any obligation or requirement to provide funds to or make any
investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or
otherwise) in any Subsidiary of the Company.
Section 5.6. Indebtedness. As
of the date of this Agreement, outstanding Indebtedness of the
Company and each of its Subsidiaries is set forth in
Section 5.6 of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
A-13
Section 5.7. SEC
Filings and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(a) The Company has filed with or furnished to the SEC, all
reports, schedules, forms, statements, prospectuses,
registration statements and other documents required to be filed
with or furnished to the SEC by the Company since
January 1, 2008 (collectively, together with any exhibits
and schedules thereto and other information incorporated
therein, the Company SEC Documents), except where
such failure to file with or furnish to the SEC such reports,
schedules, forms, statements, prospectuses, registration
statements or other documents required to be filed with or
furnished to the SEC has not had or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material
and adverse effect on the Company.
(b) As of its filing date (or, if amended, by a filing
prior to the date hereof, on the date of such filing), each
Company SEC Document complied, and each Company SEC Document
filed subsequent to the date hereof and prior to the earlier of
the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement will
comply, as to form in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of the 1933 Act and the 1934 Act, as the
case may be.
(c) As of its filing date (or, if amended or superseded by
a filing prior to the date hereof, on the date of such filing),
each Company SEC Document filed pursuant to the 1934 Act
did not, and each Company SEC Document filed subsequent to the
date hereof and prior to the earlier of the Effective Time and
the date of the termination of this Agreement will not, contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(d) Each Company SEC Document that is a registration
statement, as amended or supplemented, if applicable, filed
pursuant to the 1933 Act, as of the date such registration
statement or amendment became effective, did not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein not misleading. The Company has made
available to Parent copies of all comment letters received by
the Company from the SEC prior to the date of this Agreement
relating to the Company SEC Documents, together with all written
responses of the Company thereto. As of the date of this
Agreement, there are no outstanding unresolved comments received
from the staff of the SEC with respect to the Company SEC
Documents. To the Knowledge of the Company, as of the date of
this Agreement, none of the Company SEC Documents is the subject
of ongoing SEC review or investigation.
(e) The Company and each of its officers are in compliance
in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The management of the Company established
and maintains a system (Internal Controls) of
internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f) of
the 1934 Act) that is sufficient to provide reasonable
assurance (i) regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with GAAP, (ii) that
receipts and expenditures of the Company and its Subsidiaries
are being made in accordance with managements general or
specific authorizations, and (iii) regarding prevention or
timely detection of the unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the Companys and its Subsidiaries
assets that could have a material effect on the Companys
financial statements. The Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the 1934 Act) are designed to ensure that all material
information (both financial and non-financial) required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits
under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the SEC, and that all such material information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure and to make the certifications of the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer of the Company required
under the 1934 Act with respect to such reports. The
management of the Company has disclosed, based on its most
recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Company
Board (A) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of the Companys
Internal Controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information, and (B) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys
Internal Controls. True and correct copies of any such
disclosures made in writing (and the substance of all such
disclosures made orally) have been made available to Parent.
A-14
(f) Except as set forth in Section 5.7(f) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, since January 1, 2008, the
Company has complied in all material respects with the
applicable listing and corporate governance rules and
regulations of Nasdaq.
(g) Each of the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company (or each former principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the
Company, as applicable) have made all certifications required by
Rule 13a-14
and 15d-14
under the 1934 Act and Sections 302 and 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any related rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC and Nasdaq, and the statements contained
in any such certifications are complete and correct.
Section 5.8. Financial
Statements.
(a) The audited consolidated financial statements
(including the related notes and schedules) included or
incorporated by reference in the Company SEC Documents complied,
and audited consolidated financial statements (including the
related notes and schedules) included or incorporated by
reference in the Company SEC Documents filed after the date
hereof will comply, in all material respects with applicable
accounting requirements and the published regulations of the
SEC, have been prepared in all material respects in accordance
with GAAP applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto) and
fairly present or will fairly present, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company and its Subsidiaries as of the
indicated dates and for the indicated periods.
(b) The unaudited consolidated interim financial
information (including the related schedules) included or
incorporated by reference in the Company SEC Documents complied,
and unaudited consolidated interim financial information
(including the related schedules) included or incorporated by
reference in the Company SEC Documents filed after the date
hereof will comply, in all material respects with applicable
accounting requirements and the published regulations of the
SEC, have been prepared or will be prepared in all material
respects in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis
throughout the periods involved, subject to normal and recurring
year-end adjustments, the effect of which will not be materially
adverse and fairly present or will fairly present, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Company and its Subsidiaries
as of the indicated dates and for the indicated periods subject
to normal year-end audit adjustments in amounts that are
immaterial in nature and amounts consistent with past experience
and the absence of full footnote disclosure.
Section 5.9. Disclosure
Documents.
(a) Each document required to be filed by the Company with
the SEC or distributed or otherwise disseminated to the
Companys stockholders in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (the Company Disclosure
Documents), including the Proxy Statement (defined
below), to be filed with the SEC or distributed or otherwise
disseminated to the Company stockholders in connection with the
Merger, and any amendments or supplements thereto, when filed,
distributed or disseminated, as applicable, will comply as to
form in all material respects with the requirements of
Applicable Law, including the 1934 Act, to the extent
applicable.
(b) (i) The Proxy Statement, as supplemented or
amended, at the time such Proxy Statement or any amendment or
supplement thereto is first mailed to stockholders of the
Company and at the time such stockholders vote on adoption of
this Agreement, and (ii) any Company Disclosure Document
(other than the Proxy Statement), at the time of the filing of
such Company Disclosure Document or any supplement or amendment
thereto and at the time of any distribution or dissemination
thereof, will not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
(c) The information with respect to the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries that the Company supplies to Parent
specifically for use in the
Form F-4
(as defined below), at the time of the filing of the
Form F-4
or any amendment or supplement thereto, at the time of any
distribution or dissemination of the
Form F-4
and at the time that the
Form F-4
is declared effective, will not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. The representations and warranties
contained in this
A-15
Section 5.9 will not apply to statements or
omissions included or incorporated by reference in the Company
Disclosure Documents based upon information supplied by Parent
or Merger Sub or any of their Representatives specifically for
use or incorporation by reference therein.
Section 5.10. Taxes.
(a) All material Tax Returns required by applicable Law to
have been filed by the Company and each of its Subsidiaries have
been filed when due (taking into account any extensions), and
each such Tax Return is complete and accurate and correctly
reflects the liability for Taxes in all material respects. All
material Taxes that are due and payable have been paid.
(b) There is no audit or other proceeding pending against
or with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, with
respect to any material amount of Tax. There are no material
Liens on any of the assets of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries that arose in connection with any failure (or
alleged failure) to pay any Tax, other than Liens for Taxes not
yet due and payable.
(c) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have withheld
and paid all material Taxes required to have been withheld and
paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to any third-party.
(d) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
waived any statute of limitations in respect of Taxes or agreed
to any extension of time with respect to any Taxes.
(e) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to any Tax allocation or sharing agreement.
(f) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
been included in any consolidated,
unitary or combined Tax Return provided
for under the Law with respect to Taxes for any taxable period
for which the statute of limitations has not expired (other than
a group of which the Company
and/or its
Subsidiaries are the only members).
(g) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than any of the
Company or its Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any similar provision of any state, local, or foreign Law),
as a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise.
(h) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is or
has been a party to any listed transaction as
defined in Section 6707A(c)(2) of the Code and Treasury
Regulations
Section 1.6011-4(b)(2).
(i) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
been either a distributing corporation or a
controlled corporation in a distribution in which
the parties to such distribution treated the distribution as one
to which Section 355 of the Code is applicable within the
prior three (3) years.
(j) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has, or
since January 1, 2007 has had, a permanent
establishment in any country other than the country of its
organization.
(k) The Company and its Subsidiaries have complied in all
material respects with the intercompany transfer pricing
provisions of each applicable Law relating to Taxes, including
the contemporaneous documentation and disclosure requirements
thereunder.
(l) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is, and has
been for the last five (5) years, exempt from
U.S. federal income taxation on its
U.S.-source
shipping income under Section 883 of the Code.
(m) No written claim has ever been made by any Governmental
Authority in a jurisdiction where the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries does not file Tax Returns that the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries is or may be subject to taxation by that
jurisdiction.
Section 5.11. Compliance
with Laws; Orders; Permits.
(a) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries is, and has
been, in compliance with all Laws, Orders and Permits to which
the Company or such Subsidiary, or any of its or their Vessels
or other material assets, is subject (including Maritime
Guidelines), except where such failure to comply has not had or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
A-16
(b) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries owns, holds,
possesses or lawfully uses in the operation of its business all
Permits (including those required by Maritime Guidelines) that
are necessary or required for it to conduct its business as now
conducted, except where the failure to own, hold, possess or
lawfully use such Permit has not had or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 5.12. Absence
of Certain Changes; No Undisclosed Liabilities.
(a) Since the Company Balance Sheet Date, the Company and
its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only
in the ordinary course of business and there has not been any
change, event, circumstance, occurrence state of facts,
development or effect that has had, or is reasonably likely to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Other than as expressly required by this Agreement or
the Purchase Agreement, from the Company Balance Sheet Date
until the date hereof, there has not been any action taken by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or event that had such
action or event occurred after the date of this Agreement
without Parents consent, would constitute a breach of
Section 7.1.
(c) There are no liabilities of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued,
contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or otherwise,
other than: (i) liabilities disclosed and provided for in
the Company Balance Sheet or in the notes thereto,
(ii) liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of
business since the Company Balance Sheet Date and which are not,
individually or in the aggregate, material to the Company and
its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (iii) liabilities
incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby, and (iv) liabilities that would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to, nor do the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries have any commitment to become a party to, any joint
venture, off-balance sheet partnership or any similar Contract
(including any Contract relating to any transaction or
relationship between the Company, on the one hand, and any
unconsolidated Affiliate, including any structured finance,
special purpose or limited purpose entity or Person, on the
other hand, or any off-balance sheet arrangements
(as defined in Item 303(a) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC)), where the results, purpose or effect of such
Contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction
involving, or material liabilities of, the Company in the
Company SEC Documents.
Section 5.13. Tangible
Personal Assets. The Company and its
Subsidiaries, in the aggregate, have good and valid title to, or
a valid interest in, all of their respective tangible personal
assets, free and clear of all Liens, other than Permitted Liens
or (ii) Liens that individually or in the aggregate, do not
materially interfere with the ability of the Company or any
Subsidiary to conduct its business as currently conducted.
Section 5.14. Real
Property.
(a) Owned Real Property. Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries owns any real property.
(b) Leased Real Property. All
leases under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is
either lessor or lessee (collectively, the Real
Property Leases) are valid and binding Contracts of
the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, and are in full force
and effect (except for those that have terminated or will
terminate by their own terms), in each case, except where such
failure to be valid, binding or in full force and effect would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, and
(ii) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor
any other party thereto, is in violation or breach of or default
(or with notice or lapse of time, or both, would be in violation
or breach of or default) under the terms of any such Contract,
in each case, except where such default would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 5.15. Vessels;
Maritime Matters.
(a) Section 5.15(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule contains a list of all vessels owned by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries (the Owned
Vessels) or chartered-in by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries pursuant to charter arrangements (the
Leased Vessels), including the name,
registered owner, capacity (gross tonnage or deadweight tonnage,
as specified therein), year built, classification society,
official number, flag state, whether such Vessel is currently
operating in the spot market or time chartered market, of each
Owned Vessel and Leased Vessel.
A-17
Each Vessel is operated in compliance with all applicable
Maritime Guidelines and Laws, except where such failure to be in
compliance has not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries are
qualified to own and operate the Owned Vessels under applicable
Laws, including the Laws of each Owned Vessels flag state,
except where such failure to be qualified would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Each Vessel is seaworthy and in good
operating condition, has all national and international
operating and trading certificates and endorsements, each of
which is valid, that are required for the operation of such
Vessel in the trades and geographic areas in which it is
operated, except where such failure to be qualified would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Each Vessel is classed by a classification society
which is a member of the International Association of
Classification Societies and is materially in class with all
class and trading certificates valid through the date of this
Agreement and, to the Knowledge of the Company, (i) no
event has occurred and no condition exists that would cause such
Vessels class to be suspended or withdrawn, and
(ii) is free of average damage affecting its class.
(c) With respect to each of the Owned Vessels, either the
Company or one of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, is the sole
owner of each such Vessel and has good title to such Vessel free
and clear of all Liens other than Permitted Liens. Prior to the
date of this Agreement, the Company has delivered and made
available to the Company accurate, complete and correct copies
of the most recent inspection reports relating to each Vessel.
Section 5.16. Contracts.
(a) Section 5.16(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule lists the following Contracts to which the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries is a party:
(i) each material contract (as such term is
defined in Item 10.C and in Instructions As To
Exhibits of
Form 20-F)
to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or
bound;
(ii) each Contract not contemplated by this Agreement that
materially limits the ability of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or Affiliates to engage or compete in any manner
(each such Contract, a Non-Compete
Arrangement);
(iii) each Contract that creates a partnership, joint
venture or any strategic alliance with respect to the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries;
(iv) each indenture, credit agreement, loan agreement,
security agreement, guarantee, note, mortgage or other evidence
of indebtedness or agreement providing for indebtedness in
excess of $100,000;
(v) each Contract that relates to the acquisition or
disposition, directly or indirectly, of any material business
(whether by merger, sale of stock, sale of assets or otherwise)
or material asset, including any vessel, other than this
Agreement;
(vi) each Contract that relates to the acquisition or
disposition of, directly or indirectly (whether by merger, sale
of stock, sale of assets or otherwise) by the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries after the date of this Agreement of assets or
any business for consideration with a fair market value in
excess of $100,000;
(vii) any Contract related to the acquisition or
disposition, directly or indirectly (by merger, sale of stock,
sale of assets or otherwise), by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries prior to the date of this Agreement that include
provisions that are in effect in respect of
earn-outs or deferred or contingent consideration;
(viii) each ship-sales, memorandum of agreement or other
vessel acquisition Contract for Newbuildings and secondhand
vessels contracted for by the Company (other than Owned Vessels)
and other Contracts with respect to Newbuildings and the
financing thereof, including performance guarantees, refund
guarantees and future charters;
(ix) each operating agreement, management agreement,
crewing agreement, Contract of affreightment or financial lease
(including sale/leaseback or similar arrangements) with respect
to any Vessel;
(x) each Contract, including any option, with respect to
the purchase or sale of any vessel;
A-18
(xi) any Contract with a Third Party for the charter of any
Vessel;
(xii) each Contract that grants any right of first refusal
or right of first offer or similar right or that limits or
purports to limit the ability of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to own, operate, sell, transfer, pledge or
otherwise dispose of any material amount of assets or businesses;
(xiii) each voting agreement or registration rights
agreement;
(xiv) each management service, consulting, financial
advisory or other similar type Contract with any investment or
commercial bank;
(xv) each Contract that would or would reasonably be
expected to prevent or materially delay or impede the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the
consummation of the transactions described in the Purchase
Agreement or the Merger;
(xvi) each collective bargaining agreement or other
Contract with a labor union to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or otherwise bound;
(xvii) each Contract pursuant to which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries spent or received, in the aggregate, more
than $100,000 during the 12 months prior to the date hereof
or could reasonably be expected to spend or receive, in the
aggregate, more than $100,000 during the 12 months
immediately after the date hereof;
(xviii) each Contract that provides for indemnification by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any Person other than
a Contract entered into in the ordinary course of business or
that is not material to the Company;
(xix) each Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or otherwise bound that contains a
so-called most favored nations provision or similar
provisions requiring the Company or its Affiliates (including,
after the Seller Group Share Purchase Date, Parent or any of its
Affiliates) to offer to a Person any terms or conditions that
are at least as favorable as those offered to one or more other
Persons;
(xx) each Contract that includes a guarantee of obligations
of any other Person that is not the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries;
(xxi) each engagement and retention agreement between the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any investment bank or
financial advisor currently in effect;
(xxii) each Contract under which the execution or delivery
of this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement or the consummation
of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby would result
in a default, or an event that, with or without notice or lapse
of time or both, would constitute a default under, or cause or
permit the termination, cancellation, acceleration or other
change of any right or obligation thereunder or the loss of any
benefit of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries thereunder
under; and
(xxiii) each Contract involving a standstill or similar
obligation of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(b) The Company has heretofore made available to Parent
true and complete copies of the Material Contracts. Except for
breaches, violations or defaults which would not be reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect, each of the Material Contracts is
valid, binding, enforceable and in full force and effect and
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor to the
Knowledge of the Company any other party to a Material Contract
has violated any provision of, or taken or failed to take any
act which, with or without notice, lapse of time, or both, would
constitute a breach or default under, or give rise to any right
of cancellation or termination of or consent under, such
Material Contract, and neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received notice that it has breached, violated
or defaulted under any Material Contract.
Section 5.17. Litigation. There
is no Action pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that
(a) challenges or seeks to enjoin, alter, prevent or
materially delay the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, or (b) has had or would reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect. No officer or director of the Company or any
A-19
of its Subsidiaries is a defendant in any Action commenced by
any stockholder of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with
respect to the performance of his duties as an officer or a
director of the Company or any such Subsidiary under any
Applicable Law. There is no material unsatisfied judgment,
penalty or award against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to
any Orders that have had or would, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 5.18. Employee
Benefits.
(a) Section 5.18(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule includes a list of all Company Benefit Plans. The
Company has delivered or made available to Parent copies of each
Company Benefit Plan or, in the case of any unwritten Company
Benefit Plans, a summary thereof.
(b) Section 5.18(b) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule includes a list of all employees of the Company and
its Subsidiaries and independent contractors who perform
substantially all of their personal services for the Company and
its Subsidiaries pursuant to agreements to which the Company and
its Subsidiary are parties and the amount of wages earned by
each such individual and their place of employment, in each case
as of the date of this Agreement.
(c) Each Company Benefit Plan has been administered in
accordance with its terms and is in compliance with all
Applicable Laws, except for instances that would not reasonably
be expected to result in, individually or in the aggregate, a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
(d) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) each Company
Benefit Plan that is intended to qualify for favorable tax
benefits under the Laws of any jurisdiction is so qualified, and
(ii) to the Knowledge of the Company, no condition exists
and no event has occurred that could reasonably be expected to
result in the loss or revocation of such status. Except as would
not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect, all benefits, contributions and premiums
relating to each Company Benefit Plan have been timely paid or
made in accordance with the terms of such Company Benefit Plan
and the terms of all Applicable Laws and any related agreement.
(e) None of the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has,
within the preceding six month period, ever maintained or
contributed to, or had any obligation to contribute to any
employee benefit plan, within the meaning of
Section 3(3) of the U.S. Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA),
that is covered by ERISA.
(f) None of the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
incurred, and no event has occurred and no condition or
circumstance exists that could reasonably be expected to result
in, any unsatisfied liability of the Company and its
Subsidiaries under Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of
the Code or Section 302 of ERISA arising in connection with
any employee benefit plan covered or previously covered by
Title IV of ERISA or such sections of the Code or ERISA.
(g) Except as set forth in Section 5.18(g) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule the execution of, and
performance of the transactions contemplated in, this Agreement
and the Purchase Agreement will not (either alone or upon the
occurrence of any additional or subsequent events)
(i) constitute an event under any Company Benefit Plan or
related trust or related loan that will or may result in any
payment (whether of severance pay or otherwise), acceleration,
forgiveness of indebtedness, vesting, distribution, increase in
benefits or obligation to fund benefits with respect to any
employee or consultant or trigger the right of any employee to
terminate any employment relationship with the Company and its
Subsidiaries, or (ii) result in the triggering or
imposition of any restrictions or limitations on the right of
the Company, or any of its Subsidiaries to amend or terminate
any Company Benefit Plan.
Section 5.19. Labor
and Employment Matters. The Company and all
of its Subsidiaries have complied with all labor and employment
Laws, including, all labor and employment provisions included in
the Maritime Guidelines, and those relating to wages, hours,
workplace safety and health, immigration, individual and
collective termination, discrimination and data privacy, except
where failure to comply has not had or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. To the Knowledge of the Company, there
are no material pending, threatened, labor disputes, work
stoppages, requests for representation,
A-20
pickets, work slow-downs due to labor disagreements or any legal
actions or arbitrations that involve the labor or employment
relations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. There has
been no labor strike, dispute, work stoppage, request for
representation, picket or work slow-down within the past three
years in respect of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
except where such strike, dispute, work stoppage, request,
picket or work slow-down has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is party to any collective bargaining agreement or
any other type of collective agreement with any type of local,
national or supranational workers representatives. To the
Knowledge of the Company there is not pending or underway any
union, or any other type of workers representatives,
organizational activities or requests or elections for
representation with respect to employees of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries.
Section 5.20. Environmental. Except
for any matter that would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect, (a) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries is in
compliance with all Environmental Laws, (b) the Company and
each of its Subsidiaries possesses and is in compliance with all
Permits required under Environmental Law for the conduct of
their respective operations, and (c) there are no actions
pending against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries alleging
a violation of any Environmental Law.
Section 5.21. Insurance. The
Company and its Subsidiaries maintain (i) insurance
policies and fidelity bonds covering the Company, its
Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, properties, assets,
directors, officers or employees, and (ii) protection and
indemnity, hull and machinery and war risks insurance policies
and club entries covering the Vessels in such amounts and types
as are customary in the shipping industry (collectively, the
Policies). Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is in violation or breach of or default under any
of its obligations under any such Policy, except where such
default would not reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written
notice that any Policy has been cancelled. There are no material
claims individually or in the aggregate by the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries pending under any of the Policies as to which
coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed by the
underwriters of such Policy, as applicable, in writing or in
respect of which such underwriters have reserved their rights in
writing.
Section 5.22. Opinion
of Financial Advisor. The Special Committee
has received the written opinion of Fearnley, financial advisor
to the Special Committee, to the effect that, as of the date of
this Agreement, the Per Share Merger Consideration to be paid
pursuant to the Merger is fair to the Companys
stockholders (other than Parent, Merger Sub and the Seller
Group) from a financial point of view. The Company has made
available to Parent a true and complete copy of such opinion and
any engagement or retention agreement (and any amendments,
supplements or side letters thereto) between Fearnley and the
Company as in effect as of the date hereof.
Section 5.23. Fees.
(a) Except as set forth in Section 5.23(a) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries has any liability to pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, finder or agent with respect to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. The Company
has furnished to Parent true, correct and complete copies of
engagement letters relating to any such services, and there have
been no amendments or revisions to such engagement letters.
(b) Section 5.23(b) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule sets forth the Companys good faith estimate
of the maximum amount of fees and commissions (but not
out-of-pocket
expenses or disbursements) for which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries will be liable in connection with the Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby to any accountant, broker,
financial advisor, consultant or legal counsel retained by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 5.24. Takeover
Statutes; Rights Plan.
(a) The Company has taken all action required to be taken
by it in order to exempt this Agreement, and the transactions
contemplated hereby from, and this Agreement and the Purchase
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby
are exempt from, the requirements of any moratorium,
control share, fair
A-21
price, affiliate transaction, business
combination or other anti-takeover laws and regulations of
any Governmental Authority or contained in the Companys
articles of incorporation.
(b) The Company has taken all action, if any, necessary or
appropriate so that the execution of this Agreement and the
Purchase Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not result in
the distribution of the Company Rights under the Rights Plan or
the ability of any Person to exercise any Company Rights under
the Rights Plan.
Section 5.25. Interested
Party Transactions. Except as set forth in
Section 5.25 of the Company Disclosure Schedule,
(a) there are no Contracts or arrangements between the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any
current or former officer or director of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or any of such officers or
directors immediate family members or Affiliates, or any
current or former record or beneficial owners of 3% or more of
the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock or any of such
owners Affiliates, on the other hand (any such Contract or
arrangement, an Interested Party
Transaction), and (b) neither any Affiliate of
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries possesses, directly or
indirectly, any material financial interest in, or is a
director, officer or employee of, any Person which is a
supplier, customer, lessor, lessee or competitor of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
except as disclosed in any report, schedule, form or document
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC in respect of the Company
pursuant to
Rule 13d-1
of the 1934 Act by reporting persons any Person that is the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of Company Common Stock. Since
December 31, 2010, no event has occurred that would be
required to be reported by the Company under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC which has not been so reported.
Section 5.26. Certain
Business Practices. Neither the Company nor
any of its Subsidiaries nor (to the Knowledge of the Company),
any director, officer, agent or employee of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries (a) used any funds for unlawful
contributions, gifts, entertainment or other expenses relating
to political activity or for the business of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, (b) made any bribe or kickback,
illegal political contribution, payment from corporate funds
which was incorrectly recorded on the books and records of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, unlawful payment from
corporate funds to foreign or domestic government officials or
employees or to foreign or domestic political parties or
campaigns or violated any provision of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act of 1977 or other anti-corruption laws, or
(c) made any other unlawful payment.
Section 5.27. No
Existing Discussions. As of the date hereof,
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is engaged,
directly or indirectly, in any discussions or negotiations with
any party other than Parent with respect to an Acquisition
Proposal.
Section 5.28. No
Other Representations or Warranties. Except
for the representations and warranties contained in this
Article V, each of Parent and Merger Sub
acknowledges that neither the Company nor any other Person on
behalf of the Company makes any other express or implied
representation or warranty with respect to the Company or its
Subsidiaries or with respect to any other information provided
to Parent or Merger Sub in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Except in the case of fraud or
willful misconduct, neither the Company nor any other Person
will have or be subject to any liability or indemnification
obligation to Parent, Merger Sub or any other Person resulting
from the distribution to Parent or Merger Sub, or Parents
or Merger Subs use of, any such information, including any
information, documents, projections, forecasts or other material
made available to Parent or Merger Sub in certain data
rooms or management presentations or in any other form in
expectation of, or in connection with, the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Except as set forth in the Ocean Rig Disclosure Document, or
accurately disclosed in any report, schedule, form or document
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC by Parent and publicly
available on or after January 1, 2010 (other than any risk
factor disclosure or forward-looking statements disclosing
potential adverse future
A-22
developments included in such reports, schedules, forms or
documents), Parent and Merger Sub, jointly and severally,
represent and warrant to the Company that:
Section 6.1. Organization,
Qualification and Corporate Power. Each of
Parent and Merger Sub is a corporation duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of the Republic of
the Marshall Islands. Each of Parent and Merger Sub has all
requisite corporate power and authority and all Governmental
Authorizations, directly or indirectly, to carry on its business
as it is now being conducted. Parent and each of its
Subsidiaries is duly qualified or licensed as a foreign
corporation to do business, and is in good standing (where
applicable) or has equivalent status, in each jurisdiction where
the character of its properties or assets owned, leased or
operated by it or the nature of its activities makes such
qualification or licensing necessary, except where the failure
to be so qualified or licensed and in good standing or to have
equivalent status has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 6.2. Authorization.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by Parent and
Merger Sub of this Agreement and the consummation by Parent and
Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby are within
the corporate powers of Parent and Merger Sub and have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate action of Parent and
Merger Sub. This Agreement constitutes a valid and binding
agreement of each of Parent and Merger Sub enforceable against
each of them in accordance with its terms.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance by Parent and
Merger Sub of this Agreement and the consummation by Parent and
Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby require no
action by or in respect of, or filing with, any Governmental
Authority, other than (i) the filing and recordation of
appropriate merger or other documents as required by the MIBCA
and by relevant authorities of other jurisdictions in which the
Company is qualified to do business (including the Articles of
Merger), (ii) compliance with any applicable requirements
of the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, any other state or
federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of any
national securities exchange which are applicable to Parent,
Merger Sub or Ocean Rig, and (iii) any actions or filings
the absence of which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
(c) The preparation and filing by Ocean Rig of the
Form F-4
is within the corporate powers of Ocean Rig and has been or will
be duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of Ocean
Rig.
Section 6.3. Noncontravention. The
execution, delivery and performance by Parent and Merger Sub of
this Agreement, and the consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of
the transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not
(i) contravene, conflict with, or result in any violation
or breach of any provision of the articles of incorporation or
bylaws (or comparable organization documents, as applicable) of
Parent, Merger Sub or Ocean Rig, (ii) assuming compliance
with the matters referred to in Section 6.2(b),
contravene, conflict with, or result in a violation or breach of
any provision of any Applicable Law, (iii) assuming
compliance with matters referred to in
Section 6.2(b), require any consent or other action
by any Person, constitute a default or an event that, with or
without notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a
default under or cause or permit the termination, cancellation,
acceleration or other change of any right or obligation or the
loss of any benefit to Parent, Merger Sub or Ocean Rig under any
provision of any agreement or other instrument binding Parent,
Merger Sub or Ocean Rig or any Governmental Authorization of
Parent, Merger Sub or Ocean Rig, or (iv) result in the loss
of, or creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of the
Parent, Merger Sub or Ocean Rig with only such exceptions in the
case of clauses (ii) through (iv) as would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate
a Parent Material Adverse Effect or an Ocean Rig Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 6.4. Disclosure
Documents.
(a) The information with respect to Parent, Ocean Rig and
any of its Subsidiaries that Parent supplies to the Company
specifically for use in any Company Disclosure Document will not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading
(i) in the case of the Proxy Statement, as supplemented or
amended, if applicable, at the time such Proxy Statement or any
amendment or supplement thereto is first mailed to stockholders
of the Company and at the time such stockholders vote on
A-23
adoption of this Agreement, and (ii) in the case of any
Company Disclosure Document other than the Proxy Statement, at
the time of the filing of such Company Disclosure Document or
any supplement or amendment thereto and at the time of any
distribution or dissemination thereof.
(b) The
Form F-4,
when filed, will comply as to form in all material respects with
the applicable requirements of the 1933 Act and, at the
time of such filing or the filing of any amendment or supplement
thereto and at the time of such distribution or dissemination,
will not contain any untrue material misstatement of material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
The representations and warranties in this
Section 6.4 will not apply to statements or
omissions included or incorporated by reference in the
Form F-4
based upon information supplied to Parent, Merger Sub or Ocean
Rig by the Company or any of its Representatives specifically
for use or incorporation by reference therein.
Section 6.5. Fees. Except
for Evercore Group L.L.C., whose fees will be paid by Parent,
there is no investment banker, broker, finder or other
intermediary that has been retained by or is authorized to act
on behalf of Parent who might be entitled to any fee or
commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
Section 6.6. Organization,
Qualification and Corporate Power of Ocean
Rig. Ocean Rig is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws
of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and has all requisite
corporate power and authority and all Governmental
Authorizations, directly or indirectly, to own, lease and
operate its properties and assets and to carry on its business
as it is now being conducted. Ocean Rig is duly qualified or
licensed as a foreign corporation to do business, and is in good
standing (where applicable) or has equivalent status, in each
jurisdiction where the character of its properties or assets
owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of its activities
makes such qualification or licensing necessary, except where
the failure to be so qualified or licensed and in good standing
or to have equivalent status has not had and would not be
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate,
an Ocean Rig Material Adverse Effect. Parent has heretofore made
available to the Company true and complete copies of the
articles of incorporation and bylaws of Ocean Rig.
Section 6.7. Capitalization
of Ocean Rig.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Ocean Rig consists of
(i) 1,000,000,000 shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock and
(ii) 500,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share (Ocean Rig Preferred Stock).
As of the date of this Agreement,
(i) 131,696,928 shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock are
issued and outstanding, and (ii) no shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock are held in the treasury of Ocean Rig. As of the
date hereof, no shares of Ocean Rig Preferred Stock are issued
and outstanding. All outstanding shares of capital stock of
Ocean Rig have been duly authorized and validly issued and fully
paid and nonassessable, and free of preemptive or similar rights
under any provision of the MIBCA and the articles of
incorporation or bylaws of Ocean Rig or any agreement to which
Ocean Rig is a party or otherwise bound.
(b) [Intentionally Omitted]
(c) As of the date hereof, there is no outstanding
Indebtedness of Ocean Rig or any of its Subsidiaries having the
right to vote (or convertible into or exchangeable for
securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which
stockholders of Ocean Rig may vote.
(d) Except as set forth in this Section 6.7, as
of the date hereof, there are no issued, reserved for issuance
or outstanding (i) shares of capital stock of or other
voting securities of or ownership interests in Ocean Rig,
(ii) securities of Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs
Subsidiaries convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
shares of capital stock or other voting securities of or
ownership interests in Ocean Rig, (iii) warrants, calls,
options or other rights to acquire from Ocean Rig or any of
Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries, or other obligation of Ocean Rig
or any of Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries to issue, any capital
stock or other voting securities or ownership interests in or
any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable
for capital stock or other voting securities or ownership
interests in Ocean Rig, or (iv) restricted shares, stock
appreciation rights, performance units, contingent value rights,
phantom stock or similar securities or rights that
are derivative of, or provide economic benefits based, directly
or indirectly, on the value or price of, any capital stock or
voting securities of Ocean Rig (the items in clauses (i)
through (iv) being referred to collectively as the
Ocean Rig Securities). There are no
outstanding
A-24
obligations of Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries
to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of the Ocean Rig
Securities. Ocean Rig and Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries are not
a party to any voting agreements, voting trusts, proxies or
other similar agreements or understandings with respect to the
voting of any shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock or other Ocean
Rig Securities. Except as may be required by applicable
securities laws and regulations, as of the date hereof, Ocean
Rig and Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries are not bound by any
obligations or commitments of any character restricting the
transfer of, or requiring the registration for sale of, any
shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock or other Ocean Rig Securities.
Section 6.8. Subsidiaries.
(a) Each Subsidiary of Ocean Rig has been duly organized,
is validly existing and in good standing (except with respect to
jurisdictions that do not recognize the concept of good
standing) under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its
incorporation or formation, and has all requisite power,
Governmental Authorizations and authority to own, lease and
operate its properties and to carry on its business as now
conducted, except where the failure to be in good standing or
possess such Governmental Authorizations would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect. Each such Subsidiary of Ocean Rig is
duly qualified or licensed as a foreign corporation to do
business, and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the
character of its properties or assets owned, leased or operated
by it or the nature of its activities makes such qualification
or licensing necessary, except where the failure to be so
qualified or licensed and in good standing has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material Adverse Effect.
(b) As of the date hereof, all of the outstanding shares of
capital stock of, or voting securities of, or other ownership
interests in, each Subsidiary of Ocean Rig, is owned by Ocean
Rig directly or indirectly, free and clear of any Liens (other
than Ocean Rig Permitted Liens). As of the date hereof, there
are no issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding
(i) securities of Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs
Subsidiaries convertible into, or exchangeable or exercisable
for, shares of capital stock or other voting securities of, or
ownership interests in, any Ocean Rig Subsidiary,
(ii) warrants, calls, options or other rights to acquire
from Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries, or other
obligations of Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs
Subsidiaries, or other obligations of Ocean Rig or any of Ocean
Rigs Subsidiaries to issue, any capital stock or other
voting securities of, or ownership interests in, or any
securities convertible into, or exchangeable or exercisable for,
any capital stock or other voting securities of, or ownership
interests in, any Subsidiary of Ocean Rig, or
(iii) restricted shares, stock appreciation rights,
performance units, contingent value rights, phantom
stock or similar securities or rights that are derivative of, or
provide economic benefits based, directly or indirectly, on the
value or price of, any capital stock or other voting securities
of, or ownership interests in, any Subsidiary of Ocean Rig (the
items in clauses (i) through (iii), together with all of
the outstanding capital stock of, or other voting securities of,
or ownership interests in, each Subsidiary of Ocean Rig, being
referred to collectively as the Ocean Rig Subsidiary
Securities). As of the date hereof, there are no
outstanding obligations of Ocean Rig or any of its Subsidiaries
to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of the Ocean Rig
Securities.
Section 6.9. Ocean
Rig SEC Filings.
(a) Ocean Rig will file with or furnish to the SEC all
reports, schedules, forms, statements, prospectuses,
registration statements and other documents required to be filed
with or furnished to the SEC by it from and after the date
hereof (collectively, together with any exhibits and schedules
thereto and other information incorporated therein, and the
Ocean Rig Disclosure Document (including all amendments
thereto), the Ocean Rig SEC Documents),
except where such failure to file with or furnish to the SEC
such reports, schedules, forms, statements, prospectuses,
registration statements or other documents required to be filed
with or furnished to the SEC has not had or would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
material and adverse effect on Ocean Rig.
(b) As of its filing date (or, if amended, by a filing
prior to the date hereof, on the date of such filing), each
Ocean Rig SEC Document complied, and each Ocean Rig SEC Document
filed subsequent to the date hereof and prior to the earlier of
the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement will
comply, as to form in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of the 1933 Act and the 1934 Act, as the
case may be.
A-25
(c) As of its filing date (or, if amended or superseded by
a filing prior to the date hereof, on the date of such filing),
each Ocean Rig SEC Document filed pursuant to the 1934 Act
did not, and each Ocean Rig SEC Document filed pursuant to the
1934 Act subsequent to the date hereof and prior to the
earlier of the Effective Time and the date of the termination of
this Agreement will not, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made
therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. Ocean Rig has not been subject to the
periodic reporting requirements of the 1934 Act prior to
the date hereof.
(d) Each Ocean Rig SEC Document that is a registration
statement, as amended or supplemented, if applicable, filed
pursuant to the 1933 Act, as of the date such registration
statement or amendment became effective, did not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein not misleading. To the Knowledge of
Parent, as of the date of this Agreement, none of the Ocean Rig
SEC Documents is the subject of ongoing SEC review or
investigation.
(e) Each of the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of Ocean Rig (or each former principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of Ocean Rig,
as applicable) have made all certifications required by
Rule 13a-14
and 15d-14
under the 1934 Act and Sections 302 and 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any related rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC and Nasdaq, and the statements contained
in any such certifications are complete and correct.
Section 6.10. Financial
Statements.
(a) The audited consolidated financial statements
(including the related notes and schedules) included or
incorporated by reference in the Ocean Rig SEC Documents
complied, and audited consolidated financial statements
(including the related notes and schedules) included or
incorporated by reference in the Ocean Rig SEC Documents filed
after the date hereof will comply, in all material respects with
applicable accounting requirements and the published regulations
of the SEC, have been prepared in all material respects in
accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis throughout
the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the notes
thereto) and fairly present or will fairly present, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of Ocean Rig and its Subsidiaries
as of the indicated dates and for the indicated periods.
(b) The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
(including the related notes and schedules) included or
incorporated by reference in the Ocean Rig SEC Documents
complied, and unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements (including the related notes and schedules) included
or incorporated by reference in the Ocean Rig SEC Documents
filed after the date hereof will comply, in all material
respects with applicable accounting requirements and the
published regulations of the SEC, have been prepared or will be
prepared in all material respects in accordance with GAAP
applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods involved,
subject to normal and recurring year-end adjustments, the effect
of which will not be materially adverse (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto) and fairly present or will
fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company and its Subsidiaries as of the indicated dates and for
the indicated periods subject to normal year-end audit
adjustments in amounts that are immaterial in nature and amounts
consistent with past experience and the absence of full footnote
disclosure.
Section 6.11. Compliance
with Laws; Orders; Permits.
(a) Ocean Rig and each of its Subsidiaries is in compliance
with all Laws, Orders and Permits to which Ocean Rig or such
Subsidiary, or other material assets, is subject (including
Maritime Guidelines), except where such failure to comply has
not had or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material Adverse
Effect.
(b) Ocean Rig and each of its Subsidiaries owns, holds,
possesses or lawfully uses in the operation of its business all
Permits (including those required by Maritime Guidelines) that
are necessary or required for it to conduct its business as now
conducted, except where the failure to own, hold, possess or
lawfully use such Permit has not had or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect.
A-26
Section 6.12. Absence
of Certain Changes; No Undisclosed Liabilities.
(a) Since the Ocean Rig Balance Sheet Date, Ocean Rig and
its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only
in the ordinary course of business and there has not been any
change, event, circumstance, occurrence state of facts,
development or effect that has had, or is reasonably likely to
have, individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) There are no liabilities of Ocean Rig or any of its
Subsidiaries of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued,
contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or otherwise,
other than: (i) liabilities disclosed and provided for in
the Ocean Rig Balance Sheet or in the notes thereto,
(ii) liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of
business since the Ocean Rig Balance Sheet Date and which are
not, individually or in the aggregate, material to Ocean Rig and
its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (iii) liabilities
incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby, and (iv) liabilities that would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect. Ocean Rig is not a party to, nor does
Ocean Rig have any commitment to become a party to, any joint
venture, off-balance sheet partnership or any similar Contract
(including any Contract relating to any transaction or
relationship between Ocean Rig on the one hand, and any
unconsolidated Affiliate, including any structured finance,
special purpose or limited purpose entity or Person on the other
hand, or any off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined in
Item 303(a) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC), where the results, purpose or effect of such
Contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction
involving, or material liabilities of, Ocean Rig in the Ocean
Rig SEC Documents.
Section 6.13. Contracts. Except
for breaches, violations or defaults which would not be
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material Adverse Effect, (i) each
of Ocean Rigs material contracts is valid, binding,
enforceable and in full force and effect and neither Ocean Rig,
nor to the Knowledge of Parent any other party to a material
contract has violated any provision of, or taken or failed to
take any act which, with or without notice, lapse of time, or
both, would constitute a breach or default under, or give rise
to any right of cancellation or termination of or consent under,
such material contract, and (ii) Ocean Rig has not received
notice that it has breached, violated or defaulted under any
material contract.
Section 6.14. Tangible
Personal Assets. Ocean Rig and its
Subsidiaries, in the aggregate, have good and valid title to, or
a valid interest in, all of their respective tangible personal
assets, free and clear of all Liens, other than Ocean Rig
Permitted Liens or (ii) Liens that individually or in the
aggregate, do not materially interfere with the ability of Ocean
Rig or any of its Subsidiaries to conduct its business as
currently conducted.
Section 6.15. Labor
and Employment Matters. Ocean Rig has
complied with all labor and employment Laws, including all labor
and employment provisions included in the Maritime Guidelines,
and those relating to wages, hours, workplace safety and health,
immigration, individual and collective termination,
discrimination and data privacy, except where failure to comply
has not had or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material Adverse
Effect.
Section 6.16. Environmental. Except
for any matter that would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material Adverse
Effect, (a) Ocean Rig is in compliance with all
Environmental Laws, (b) Ocean Rig possesses and is
compliance with all Permits required under Environmental Law for
the conduct of its operations, and (c) there are no actions
pending against Ocean Rig alleging a violation of any
Environmental Law.
Section 6.17. Litigation. There
is no Action pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened
against Ocean Rig or any of its Subsidiaries that
(a) challenges or seeks to enjoin, alter, prevent or
materially delay the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, or (b) has had or would reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Ocean Rig Material
Adverse Effect. No officer or director of Ocean Rig or any of
its Subsidiaries is a defendant in any Action commenced by any
stockholder of Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries
with respect to the performance of his duties as an officer or a
director of Ocean Rig or any such Subsidiary under any
Applicable Law. There is no material unsatisfied judgment,
penalty or award against Ocean Rig or any of Ocean Rigs
Subsidiaries. Neither Ocean Rig nor any of its Subsidiaries is
subject to any Orders that have had or would, individually or in
the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have an Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect.
A-27
Section 6.18. No
Other Representations or Warranties. Except
for the representations and warranties contained in this
Article VI, the Company acknowledges that neither
Parent nor Merger Sub nor any other Person on behalf of Parent
or Merger Sub makes any other express or implied representation
or warranty with respect to Parent, Ocean Rig or any of their
respective Subsidiaries or with respect to any other information
provided to the Company in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Except in the case of fraud or
willful misconduct, neither Parent nor any other Person will
have or be subject to any liability or indemnification
obligation to the Company or any other Person resulting from the
distribution to the Company, or the Companys use of, any
such information, including any information, documents,
projections, forecasts or other material made available to the
Company in certain data rooms or management
presentations or in any other form in expectation of, or in
connection with, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE VII
CONDUCT OF
BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
Section 7.1. Operation
of the Companys Business.
(a) Except (A) as set forth in Section 7.1(a)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule, (B) as expressly
required by this Agreement or permitted pursuant to
Section 7.6 of this Agreement, or (C) with the
prior written consent of Parent, from the date hereof until the
Effective Time, the Company shall, and shall cause each of its
Subsidiaries to, carry on its business in the ordinary course
and in a manner consistent with past practice and to use its
reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve intact its present
business organization, goodwill and material assets,
(ii) maintain in effect all Governmental Authorizations
required to carry on its business as now conducted,
(iii) keep available the services of its present officers
and other employees (provided that the Company shall not
be obligated to increase the compensation of, or make any other
payments to, such officers and employees), and
(iv) preserve its present relationships with customers,
suppliers and other Persons with which it has a business
relationship.
(b) Without limiting the generality of
Section 7.1(a), except (A) as set forth in
Section 7.1(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule,
(B) as expressly required by this Agreement or permitted
pursuant to Section 7.6 of this Agreement, or
(C) with the prior written consent of Parent, from the date
hereof until the Effective Time, the Company shall not, nor
shall it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, do any of the
following:
(i) amend its articles of incorporation, bylaws or other
comparable charter or organizational documents (whether by
merger, consolidation or otherwise);
(ii) (A) declare, set aside or pay any dividends on,
or make any other distributions (whether in cash, stock,
property or otherwise) in respect of, any shares of Company
Common Stock, other Company Securities or Company Subsidiary
Securities, other than dividends and distributions by a direct
or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company to its
parent, (B) split, combine or reclassify any shares of
Company Common Stock, other Company Securities or Company
Subsidiary Securities, (C) issue or authorize the issuance
of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in
substitution for, any shares of Company Common Stock, other
Company Securities or Company Subsidiary Securities
(D) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of
Company Common Stock, other Company Securities or Company
Subsidiary Securities, or (E) take any action that would
result in any amendment, modification or change of any term of,
or material default under, any Indebtedness of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries;
(iii) (A) issue, deliver, sell, grant, pledge,
transfer, subject to any Lien or otherwise encumber or dispose
of any shares of Company Common Stock, shares of Class B
Common Stock, shares of Preferred Stock, other Company
Securities or Company Subsidiary Securities, or (B) amend
any term of any Company Securities or any Company Subsidiary
Securities (in each case, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
(iv) incur more than $50,000 of capital expenditures, in
the aggregate;
(v) acquire or commit to acquire (A) all or any
substantial portion of a business or Person or division thereof
(whether by purchase of stock, purchase of assets, merger,
consolidation, or otherwise), or (B) any assets or
properties involving a price in excess of $50,000 individually
or $100,000 in the aggregate;
A-28
(vi) enter into or materially amend, modify, extend or
terminate any Material Contact or any Interested Party
Transaction;
(vii) sell, lease, license, pledge, transfer, subject to
any Lien or otherwise dispose of, any of its assets or
properties except (A) sales of used equipment in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
(B) Permitted Liens incurred in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
(viii) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, or enter into any agreement with respect to
the voting of its capital stock or other securities held by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries;
(ix) (A) grant to any current or former director,
officer, employee or consultant of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries any increase or enhancement in compensation, bonus
or other benefits, (B) grant to any current or former
director or executive officer or employee of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries any severance, change in control, retention
or termination pay or benefits or any increase in severance,
change of control or termination pay or benefits, except in
connection with actual termination in the ordinary course of any
such Person to the extent required under Applicable Law or
existing Company Benefit Plans or existing policy, or
(C) adopt, enter into or amend or commit to adopt, enter
into or amend any Company Benefit Plan except for amendments as
required under Applicable Law (subject to approval of Parent,
not to be unreasonably withheld) or pursuant to the terms of
such plan;
(x) except as required by GAAP or
Regulation S-X
under the 1934 Act, make any change in any method of
accounting principles, method or practices;
(xi) (A) incur or issue any Indebtedness, or
(B) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to,
or investments in, any other Person, other than to the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries;
(xii) change any method of Tax accounting, make or change
any material Tax election, file any material amended return,
settle or compromise any material Tax liability, fail to
complete and file, consistent with past practice, all Tax
Returns required to be filed by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, fail to pay all amounts shown due on such Tax
Returns, agree to an extension or waiver of the statute of
limitations with respect to the assessment or determination of
material Taxes, enter into any closing agreement with respect to
any material Tax, surrender any right to claim a material Tax
refund, offset or otherwise reduce Tax liability or take into
account on any Tax Return required to be filed prior to the
Closing any adjustment or benefit arising from the transactions
contemplated hereby;
(xiii) institute, settle, or agree to settle any action,
suit, litigation, investigation or proceeding pending or
threatened before any arbitrator, court or other Governmental
Authority;
(xiv) disclose, or consent to the disclosure of, any of its
trade secrets or other proprietary information, other than in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
and pursuant to an appropriate non-disclosure agreement;
(xv) waive, release or assign any claims or rights having a
value of $50,000 individually or $100,000 in the aggregate;
(xvi) fail to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause
the current insurance (or re-insurance) policies maintained by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, including
directors and officers insurance, not to be
cancelled or terminated or any of the coverage thereunder to
lapse, unless simultaneously with such termination, cancellation
or lapse, replacement policies underwritten by insurance or
re-insurance companies of nationally recognized standing having
comparable deductions and providing coverage equal to or greater
than the coverage under the cancelled, terminated or lapsed
policies for substantially similar premiums or less are in full
force and effect; provided that neither the Company nor
any of its Subsidiaries shall obtain or renew any insurance (or
reinsurance) policy for a term exceeding twelve (12) months;
(xvii) knowingly or intentionally take, or agree in writing
or otherwise to take, any action that would or is reasonably
likely to result in any of the conditions to the Merger set
forth in Article X not being satisfied, or would
make any representation or warranty of the Company contained
herein inaccurate in any material
A-29
respect at, or as of any time prior to, the Effective Time, or
that would materially impair the ability of the Company to
consummate the Merger in accordance with the terms hereof or
materially delay such consummation;
(xviii) take any action which would, directly or
indirectly, restrict or impair the ability of Parent or Merger
Sub to vote, or otherwise to exercise the rights and receive the
benefits of a stockholder with respect to, securities of the
Company acquired or controlled or to be acquired or controlled
by Parent or Merger Sub;
(xix) directly or indirectly (A) purchase or construct
any vessel or enter into any Contract for the purchase or
construction of any vessel, (B) sell or otherwise dispose
of any Vessel or enter into any contract for the sale or
disposal of any Vessel, (C) enter into any contract for the
bareboat or time charter-out of any Vessel (including any Vessel
owned or chartered-in by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries), (D) defer scheduled maintenance of any
Vessel, (E) depart from any normal drydock and maintenance
practices or discontinue replacement of spares in operating the
Vessels, provided that the Company will not, and will
cause its Subsidiaries not to enter into any contract for the
drydocking or repair of any Vessel where the estimated cost
thereof is in excess of $100,000 unless, in the case of this
clause (E), such work cannot prudently be deferred and is
required to preserve the safety and seaworthiness of such
Vessel, or
(xx) except as permitted in Section 7.4,
authorize or enter into a Contract or arrangement to take any of
the actions described in clauses (i) through (xix) of
this Section 7.1.
Section 7.2. Operation
of Ocean Rigs Business. Except
(A) as expressly required by this Agreement, or
(B) with the prior written consent of the Company, from the
date hereof until the Effective Time, Parent shall cause Ocean
Rig and each of Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries to, carry on its
business in the ordinary course and to use its reasonable best
efforts to (i) preserve intact its present business
organization, goodwill and material assets, (ii) maintain
in effect all Governmental Authorizations required to carry on
its business as now conducted, (iii) keep available the
services of its present officers and other employees
(provided that Parent shall not be obligated to cause
Ocean Rig or Ocean Rigs Subsidiaries to increase the
compensation of, or make any other payments to, such officers
and employees), and (iv) preserve its present relationships
with customers, suppliers and other Persons with which it has a
business relationship. Parent shall not knowingly or
intentionally take or agree in writing or otherwise to take, any
action that would or is reasonably likely to result in any of
the conditions to the Merger set forth in Article X
not being satisfied, or that would materially impair the ability
of Parent to consummate the Merger in accordance with the terms
hereof (including disposition of such quantity of Ocean Rig
Common Stock as would result in their having insufficient shares
to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby) or materially
delay such consummation.
Section 7.3. [Intentionally
Omitted]
Section 7.4. Access
to Information. After the date hereof until
the Effective Time and subject to Applicable Law and the
Confidentiality Agreement dated as of June 28, 2011 between
the Company and Parent (the Confidentiality
Agreement), the Company and Parent shall (i) give
each other and their respective counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives, upon reasonable
notice, reasonable access to the offices, properties, books and
records of the Company, the Subsidiaries, Parent, Merger Sub and
Ocean Rig, as applicable, (ii) furnish to each other and
their respective counsel, financial advisors, auditors and other
authorized representatives such financial and operating data and
other information as such Persons may reasonably request, and
(iii) instruct the employees, counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives of the Company,
the Subsidiaries, Parent, Merger Sub and Ocean Rig, as
applicable, to cooperate with Parent and the Company in the
matters described in clauses (i) and (ii) above.
Section 7.5. Notice
of Developments. The Company will give prompt
written notice to the Parent of any event that has had or would
reasonably be expected to give rise to, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. The delivery of
any notice pursuant to this Section 7.5 will not
limit, expand or otherwise affect the remedies available
hereunder (if any) to the party receiving such notice.
A-30
Section 7.6. No
Solicitation.
(a) General Prohibitions. Subject
to Section 7.6(b) after the date hereof and prior to
the earlier of the termination of this Agreement in accordance
with Section 11.1 and the Effective Time, the
Company and its Subsidiaries shall not (and the Company shall
use its reasonable best efforts to cause its or any of its
Subsidiaries Representatives not to), directly or
indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly take any
action to facilitate or encourage the submission of any
Acquisition Proposal, (ii) enter into or participate in any
discussions or negotiations with, furnish any information
relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or afford
access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any Third Party with
respect to inquiries regarding, or the making of, an Acquisition
Proposal, (iii) fail to make, withdraw, or modify or amend
in a manner adverse to Parent the Special Committee
Recommendation or the Company Board Recommendation (or recommend
an Acquisition Proposal) (any of the foregoing in this clause
(iii), an Adverse Recommendation Change),
(iv) grant any waiver or release under any standstill or
similar agreement with respect to any class of equity securities
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (v) approve,
endorse, recommend or enter into (or publicly propose to do any
of the foregoing) any agreement in principle, letter of intent,
term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option
agreement or other similar instrument relating to an Acquisition
Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement with a Third
Party to whom the Company is permitted to provide information in
accordance with Section 7.6(b)(i)),
(vi) approve any transaction under Article K of the
Companys articles of incorporation; or (vii) redeem
the Company Rights, amend or modify or terminate the Rights Plan
or exempt any Person from, or approve any transaction under, the
Rights Plan. The Company and its Subsidiaries shall (and the
Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its or
any of its Subsidiaries Representatives to) cease
immediately and cause to be terminated any and all existing
activities, solicitations, encouragements, discussions or
negotiations, if any, with any Third Party and its
Representatives and its financing sources conducted prior to the
date hereof with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or efforts
to obtain an Acquisition Proposal and require the destruction or
return of all non-public materials, documents and information
concerning the Company and its Subsidiaries provided to any such
Third Party or its Representatives or financing sources. Any
failure of any Representative of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to comply with this Section 7.6 shall
constitute a breach by the Company of this
Section 7.6, regardless of whether the Company used
its reasonable best efforts to cause its or any of its
Subsidiaries Representatives to comply with this
Section 7.6.
(b) Exceptions.
(i) Prior to (but not at any time after) the Scheduled
Seller Group Purchase Date, the Company, directly or indirectly
through its Representatives, may (A) engage in negotiations
or discussions with any Third Party and its Representatives or
financing sources that has made (and not withdrawn) after the
date of this Agreement a bona fide, written Acquisition Proposal
that (x) did not result from a breach or violation of the
provisions of Section 7.6(a), and (y) the
Special Committee reasonably believes in good faith, after
consulting with its outside legal and financial advisors, would
reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, and
(B) thereafter furnish to such Third Party or its
Representatives or its financing sources non-public information
relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to a
confidentiality agreement (a copy of which shall be provided for
informational purposes only to Parent) with such Third Party
with terms no less favorable to the Company than those contained
in the Confidentiality Agreement and containing additional
provisions that expressly permit the Company to comply with the
terms of this Section 7.6 if, in the case of either
clause (A) or (B), the Special Committee determines in good
faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the
failure to take such action is reasonably likely to result in a
breach of its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law and the
Company shall have provided Parent and Merger Sub two
(2) Business Days notice of its intention to take any
action discussed in clause (A) or (B); provided that
all such information provided or made available to such Third
Party (to the extent that such information has not been
previously provided or made available to Parent) is provided or
made available to Parent, as the case may be, prior to or
substantially concurrently with the time it is provided or made
available to such Third Party.
(ii) At any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder
Approval, in response to a material fact, event, change,
development, or set of circumstances (other than an Acquisition
Proposal) occurring or arising after the date of this Agreement
that was not known or reasonably foreseeable by the Special
Committee or the Company Board as of or prior to the date of
this Agreement (such material fact, event, change development or
set of circumstances, an Intervening Event),
if the Special Committee or the Company Board reasonably
determines in good faith, after
A-31
consultation with outside legal and financial advisors, that in
light of such Intervening Event, the failure of the Special
Committee or the Company Board, as applicable, to effect an
Adverse Recommendation Change is reasonably likely to result in
a breach of its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law, the
Special Committee or the Company Board, as applicable, may make
an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided,
however, that the Company shall not be entitled to
exercise its right to make an Adverse Recommendation Change
pursuant to this Section 7.6(b)(ii) unless the
Company has (A) provided to Parent at least five
(5) Business Days prior written notice advising
Parent that the Special Committee or the Company Board intends
to take such action and specifying the facts underlying the
Special Committee or the Company Boards determination that
an Intervening Event has occurred, and the reasons for the
Adverse Recommendation Change, in reasonable detail, and
(B) during such five (5) Business Day period, if
requested by Parent, engaged in good faith negotiations with
Parent to amend this Agreement in such a manner that obviates
the need for an Adverse Recommendation Change as a result of the
Intervening Event.
(iii) Prior to (but not at any time from or after) the
Scheduled Seller Group Share Purchase Date, the Company may,
following receipt of and on account of a Superior Proposal,
terminate this Agreement to enter into a definitive agreement
with respect to, a Superior Proposal in accordance with
Section 11.1, or make an Adverse Recommendation
Change in connection with such Superior Proposal, if such
Superior Proposal did not result from a breach or violation of
the provisions of Section 7.6 and the Special
Committee reasonably determines in good faith, after
consultation with outside legal and financial advisors, that in
light of such Superior Proposal, the failure of the Special
Committee to take such action is reasonably likely to result in
a breach of its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law;
provided, however, the Company shall not be
entitled to terminate this Agreement or effect an Adverse
Recommendation Change in connection with a Superior Proposal
unless (A) the Company promptly notifies Parent, in
writing, at least five (5) Business Days (the
Notice Period) before making an Adverse
Recommendation Change or terminating this Agreement to enter
into (or causing a Subsidiary to enter into) a definitive
agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, of its intention
to take such action with respect to such Superior Proposal,
which notice shall state expressly that the Company has received
an Acquisition Proposal that the Special Committee has
determined to be a Superior Proposal and that the Special
Committee intends to make an Adverse Recommendation Change
and/or the
Company intends to terminate this Agreement to enter into a
definitive agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal;
(B) the Company attaches to such notice the most current
version of the proposed agreement and the identity of the Third
Party making such Superior Proposal; (C) during the Notice
Period, if requested by Parent, the Company has, and has
directed its Representatives to, engaged in negotiations with
Parent in good faith to amend this Agreement or increase the Per
Share Merger Consideration in such a manner that such Superior
Proposal ceases to constitute a Superior Proposal; and
(D) following the Notice Period, the Special Committee
shall have determined in good faith, taking into account any
changes to this Agreement or increase to the Per Share Merger
Consideration made or proposed in writing by Parent and Merger
Sub, that such Superior Proposal continues to constitute a
Superior Proposal; provided, however that with
respect to any applicable Superior Proposal, any amendment to
the financial terms or any other material amendment to a term of
such Superior Proposal shall require a new written notice by the
Company and a new Notice Period, and no such termination of this
Agreement by the Company or Adverse Recommendation Change in
connection with such Superior Proposal may be made during any
Notice Period.
In addition, nothing contained herein shall prevent the Special
Committee or the Company Board from (i) complying with
Rule 14e-2(a)
under the 1934 Act with regard to an Acquisition Proposal
so long as any action taken or statement made to so comply is
consistent with this Section 7.6; provided
that any such action taken or statement made that relates to an
Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be an Adverse
Recommendation Change unless the Special Committee and the
Company Board reaffirms the Company Board Recommendation in such
statement or in connection with such action, or
(ii) issuing a stop, look and listen disclosure
or similar communication of the type contemplated by
Rule 14d-9(f)
under the 1934 Act (which it is agreed shall not constitute
an Adverse Recommendation Change).
(c) Required Notices. The Company
and the Company Board shall not take any of the actions referred
to in Section 7.6(b) unless the Company shall have
first complied with the applicable requirements of this
Section 7.6(c). The Company shall notify
Parent promptly (but in no event later than 24 hours) after
receipt by the Company (or any of its Representatives) of any
Acquisition Proposal, including the material terms and
conditions thereof and the
A-32
identity of the Person making such Acquisition Proposal and its
proposed financing sources, and shall keep Parent reasonably
informed on a prompt basis (but in any event no later than
24 hours) as to the status (including changes or proposed
changes to the material terms) of such Acquisition Proposal. The
Company shall also notify Parent promptly (but in no event later
than 24 hours) after receipt by the Company of any request
for non-public information relating to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or for access to the business, properties, assets,
books or records of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by
any Third Party that has informed the Company that it is
considering making, or has made, an Acquisition Proposal.
(d) Definition of Superior
Proposal. For purposes of this Agreement,
Superior Proposal means a bona fide,
unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal (provided that,
for the purposes of this definition, references to
15% in the definition of Acquisition Proposal shall
be deemed replaced with references to 100%) that
(i) is not subject to any financing condition and for which
financing has been fully committed or is on hand or the Special
Committee determines in good faith after considering the advice
of its financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation is
reasonably capable of being fully financed, (ii) the
Special Committee determines in good faith by a majority vote,
after considering the advice of its outside counsel and its
financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, is
reasonably likely to be consummated in accordance with its
terms, taking into account all aspects of the proposal and the
identity of the Person making the Acquisition Proposal, and
(iii) the Special Committee determines in good faith by a
majority vote, after considering the advice of its financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation, would result in a
transaction more favorable, from a financial point of view to
the Companys stockholders than the Merger provided
hereunder (after taking into account any amendment to this
Agreement or increase the Per Share Merger Consideration
proposed by Parent).
Section 7.7. Litigation.
(a) The Company shall promptly advise Parent of any Action
involving the Company or any of its officers or directors, or
the Special Committee, relating to this Agreement or the
Purchase Agreement or the transactions thereunder and shall keep
Parent informed and consult with Parent regarding the status of
the Action on an ongoing basis. The Company shall cooperate with
and give Parent the opportunity to consult with respect to the
defense or settlement of any such Action, and such settlement
shall not be agreed to without the prior written consent of
Parent.
(b) Parent shall promptly advise the Company of any Action
involving Parent or Ocean Rig or any of its officers or
directors, relating to this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement
or the transactions thereunder and shall keep the Company
informed and consult with the Company regarding the status of
the Action on an ongoing basis. Parent shall cooperate with and
give the Company the opportunity to consult with respect to the
defense or settlement of any such Action.
Section 7.8. Employee
Matters.
(a) Employment Agreements. Prior
to the Closing Date, Parent shall use reasonable efforts to
enter into employment agreements effective as of the Closing
Date, with Demetris Nenes and Solon Dracoulis in form and
substance acceptable to Parent and such employees.
(b) Severance. Section 7.8(b)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true and
complete list of all severance payments and other
employment-related payments due to any officer, director or
employee of the Company in connection with, or as a result of,
the Closing (the Employment-Related Closing
Payments). Immediately prior to the Closing, the
Company shall pay all Employment-Related Closing Payments. If
the Closing occurs prior to December 31, 2011, the Company
shall pay directors fees for the directors of the Company
through December 31, 2011.
Section 7.9. Ocean
Rig Common Stock. Parent shall cause the
shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock that are to be delivered to the
holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to
Section 3.2(b) to be free of any Liens and
restrictions on transfer, except those imposed by Applicable
Law, and preemptive rights at the time of such delivery.
A-33
ARTICLE VIII
COVENANTS OF
PARENT
Section 8.1. Obligations
of Merger Sub. Parent shall take all action
necessary to cause Merger Sub to perform its obligations under
this Agreement and to consummate the Merger on the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Section 8.2. Voting
of Shares.
(a) Parent shall cause all shares of Company Common Stock
owned beneficially or of record by it, Merger Sub or any of its
other Subsidiaries to be voted in favor of adoption of this
Agreement at the Company Stockholder Meeting or any postponement
or adjournment thereof.
(b) Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall not vote any
of the shares of Company Common Stock owned beneficially or of
record by it, Merger Sub or any of its other Subsidiaries in
favor of the removal of any director of the Company or in favor
of the election of any director not approved by the Special
Committee.
Section 8.3. Director
and Officer Liability. Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation, and the Surviving Corporation hereby
agrees, to do the following:
(a) For six years after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless the present and
former officers and directors of the Company and its
Subsidiaries (each, an Indemnified Person) in
respect of acts or omissions in their capacities as officers or
directors occurring at or prior to the Effective Time to the
fullest extent permitted by the MIBCA or any other Applicable
Law or provided under the Companys articles of
incorporation and bylaws in effect on the date hereof;
provided that such indemnification shall be subject to
any limitation imposed from time to time under Applicable Law.
(b) For six years after the Effective Time, Parent shall
cause to be maintained in effect provisions in the Surviving
Corporations articles of incorporation and bylaws (or in
such documents of any successor to the business of the Surviving
Corporation) regarding elimination of liability of directors,
indemnification of officers, directors and employees and
advancement of expenses that are no less advantageous to the
intended beneficiaries than the corresponding provisions in
existence on the date of this Agreement.
(c) Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall (subject
to the approval of Parent not to be unreasonably withheld or
delayed) or, if the Company is unable to, Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation as of the Effective Time to, obtain and
fully pay the premium for the non-cancellable extension of the
directors and officers liability coverage of the
Companys existing directors and officers
insurance policies and the Companys existing fiduciary
liability insurance policies (collectively, D&O
Insurance), in each case for a claims reporting or
discovery period of at least six years from and after the
Effective Time with respect to any claim related to any period
or time at or prior to the Effective Time from an insurance
carrier with the same or better credit rating as the
Companys current insurance carrier with respect to
D&O Insurance with terms, conditions, retentions and limits
of liability that are no less favorable in the aggregate than
the coverage provided under the Companys existing policies
with respect to any actual or alleged error, misstatement,
misleading statement, act, omission, neglect, breach of duty or
any matter claimed against a current or former director or
officer of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by reason of
him or her serving in such capacity that existed or occurred at
or prior to the Effective Time (including in connection with
this Agreement or the transactions or actions contemplated
hereby). If the Company or the Surviving Corporation for any
reason fail to obtain such tail insurance policies
as of the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall, and
Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, continue to
maintain in effect, for a period of at least six years from and
after the Effective Time, the D&O Insurance in place as of
the date hereof with the Companys current insurance
carrier or with an insurance carrier with the same or better
credit rating as the Companys current insurance carrier
with respect to D&O Insurance with terms, conditions,
retentions and limits of liability that are no less favorable in
the aggregate than the coverage provided under the
Companys existing policies as of the date hereof, or the
Surviving Corporation shall purchase from the Companys
current insurance carrier or from an insurance carrier with the
same or better credit rating as the Companys current
insurance carrier with respect to D&O Insurance comparable
D&O Insurance for such six-year period with
A-34
terms, conditions, retentions and limits of liability that are
no less favorable than as provided in the Companys
existing policies as of the date hereof; provided that in
no event shall Parent or the Surviving Corporation be required
to expend for such policies pursuant to this sentence an annual
premium amount in excess of 200% of the amount per annum the
Company paid in its last full fiscal year, which amount is set
forth in Section 8.3(c) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule; and provided further that if the
aggregate premiums of such insurance coverage exceed such
amount, the Surviving Corporation shall be obligated to obtain a
policy with the greatest coverage available, with respect to
matters occurring prior to the Effective Time, for a cost not
exceeding such amount.
(d) If Parent, the Surviving Corporation or any of its
successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into
any other Person and shall not be the continuing or surviving
corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger, or
(ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any Person, then, and in each such
case, to the extent necessary, proper provision shall be made so
that the successors and assigns of Parent or the Surviving
Corporation, as the case may be, shall assume the obligations
set forth in this Section 8.3.
(e) The rights of each Indemnified Person under this
Section 8.3 shall be in addition to any rights such
Person may have under the articles of incorporation or bylaws of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, under the MIBCA or any
other Applicable Law or under any agreement of any Indemnified
Person with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. These rights
shall survive consummation of the Merger and are intended to
benefit, and shall be enforceable by, each Indemnified Person.
Section 8.4. Stock
Exchange Listing. Parent shall use its
reasonable best efforts to cause Ocean Rig to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions, and do or cause to be done all things,
reasonably necessary, proper or advisable on its part under
Applicable Laws and rules and policies of Nasdaq to ensure that
the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock comprising the Per Share
Merger Consideration are listed on Nasdaq prior to or as of the
Effective Time.
ARTICLE IX
COVENANTS OF
PARENT AND THE COMPANY
Section 9.1. Company
Stockholder Meeting; Proxy Statement; Registration
Statement.
(a) As soon as reasonably practicable following the date of
this Agreement, Parent and the Company shall jointly prepare,
and Parent shall cause Ocean Rig to file with the SEC a
registration statement on
Form F-4
to register, under the 1933 Act, the shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock to be distributed in the Merger (together with all
amendments supplements and exhibits thereto, the
Form F-4),
which shall include a prospectus with respect to the shares of
Ocean Rig Common Stock to be distributed in the Merger and a
proxy statement to be sent to the stockholders of the Company
relating to the Company Stockholders Meeting (together with any
amendments or supplements thereto, the Proxy
Statement). Parent and the Company shall use their
respective reasonable best efforts to cause the
Form F-4
to be declared effective under the 1933 Act as soon as
reasonably practicable after such filing. Each of the Company
and Parent shall furnish all information concerning such Person
and its Affiliates to the other, and provide such other
assistance, as may be reasonably requested in connection with
the preparation, filing and distribution of the
Form F-4
and Proxy Statement, and the
Form F-4
and the Proxy Statement shall include all information reasonably
requested by such other party to be included therein. Each of
the Company and Parent shall promptly notify the other upon the
receipt of any comments from the SEC or any request from the SEC
for amendments or supplements to the
Form F-4
or the Proxy Statement and shall provide the other with copies
of all correspondence between it and its Representatives, on the
one hand, and the SEC, on the other hand. The Company shall, and
Parent shall cause Ocean Rig to, use its reasonable best efforts
to respond as promptly as reasonably practicable to any comments
from the SEC with respect to the
Form F-4.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to filing the
Form F-4
(or any amendment or supplement thereto) or mailing the Proxy
Statement (or any amendment or supplement thereto) or responding
to any comments of the SEC with respect thereto, the Company
shall, and Parent shall cause Ocean Rig to, (i) provide the
other an opportunity to review and comment on such document or
response (including the proposed final version of such document
or response), (ii) consider in good faith all comments
reasonably proposed by the other and (iii) not file or mail
such document or respond to the SEC prior to
A-35
receiving the approval of the other, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Company
shall, and Parent shall cause Ocean Rig to, advise the other,
promptly after receipt of notice thereof, of the time of
effectiveness of the
Form F-4,
the issuance of any stop order relating thereto or the
suspension of the qualification of the shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock for offering or sale in any jurisdiction, and each
of the Company and Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts
to have any such stop order or suspension lifted, reversed or
otherwise terminated. Each of the Company and Parent shall also
take any other action (other than qualifying to do business in
any jurisdiction in which it is not now so qualified) required
to be taken under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, any
applicable foreign or state securities or blue sky
laws and the rules and regulations thereunder in connection with
the Merger and the delivery of any shares of Ocean Rig Common
Stock that comprise the Per Share Merger Consideration, if any.
(b) If prior to the Effective Time, any event occurs with
respect to Parent, Ocean Rig or any of their respective
Subsidiaries, or any change occurs with respect to other
information supplied by Parent for inclusion in the Proxy
Statement or the
Form F-4,
which is required to be described in an amendment of, or a
supplement to, the Proxy Statement or the
Form F-4,
Parent shall promptly notify the Company of such event, and
Parent shall cause Ocean Rig to, and the Company shall,
cooperate in the prompt filing with the SEC of any necessary
amendment or supplement to the
Form F-4
and, as required by Law, in disseminating the information
contained in such amendment or supplement to the Companys
stockholders. Nothing in this Section 9.1(b) shall
limit the obligations of any party under
Section 9.1(a).
(c) If prior to the Effective Time, any event occurs with
respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or any change
occurs with respect to other information supplied by the Company
for inclusion in the Proxy Statement or the
Form F-4,
which is required to be described in an amendment of, or a
supplement to, the Proxy Statement or the
Form F-4,
the Company shall promptly notify Parent of such event, and the
Company shall, and Parent shall cause Ocean Rig to, cooperate in
the prompt filing with the SEC of any necessary amendment or
supplement to the
Form F-4
and, as required by Law, in disseminating the information
contained in such amendment or supplement to the Companys
stockholders. Nothing in this Section 9.1(c) shall
limit the obligations of any party under
Section 9.1(a).
(d) The Company shall, as soon as reasonably practicable
following the date of this Agreement, duly call, give notice of,
convene and hold (no earlier than the Scheduled Seller Group
Share Purchase Date) a meeting of the stockholders (the
Company Stockholders Meeting) for the sole
purpose of seeking the Company Stockholder Approval. The Company
shall use its reasonable best efforts to (i) cause the
Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Companys stockholders
as promptly as practicable after the
Form F-4
is declared effective under the 1933 Act and to hold the
Company Stockholders Meeting as soon as practicable after the
Form F-4
becomes effective and (ii) subject to
Section 7.6(b), solicit the Company Stockholder
Approval. The Special Committee and the Company Board shall
recommend to the holders of shares of Company Common Stock that
they give the Company Stockholder Approval and shall include
such recommendation in the Proxy Statement, except to the extent
that the Special Committee or the Company Board shall have made
an Adverse Recommendation Change as permitted by
Section 7.6(b). The Company agrees that its
obligations to hold the Company Stockholders Meeting pursuant to
this Section 9.1 shall not be affected by the
commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or
communication to the Company of any Acquisition Proposal or by
the making of any Adverse Recommendation Change.
Section 9.2. Regulatory
Undertaking.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
the Company and Parent shall use their respective reasonable
best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to
do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or
advisable under Applicable Law to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including (i) preparing and
filing as promptly as practicable with any Governmental
Authority or other Third Party all documentation to effect all
necessary filings, notices, petitions, statements,
registrations, submissions of information, applications and
other documents, and (ii) obtaining and maintaining all
approvals, consents, registrations, permits, authorizations and
other confirmations required to be obtained from any
Governmental Authority or other Third Party that are necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement; provided that the obligations set
forth in this sentence shall not be deemed to have been breached
as a result of actions by the Company or its Subsidiaries
permitted by Section 7.6(b).
A-36
(b) Notwithstanding anything in this
Section 9.2 or otherwise in this Agreement, none of
Parent, Merger Sub or the Company shall be required, without the
prior written consent of Parent, to consent to any requirement,
condition, limitation, understanding, agreement or order
(x) to sell, divest, license, assign, transfer, hold
separate or otherwise dispose of any material portion of the
assets or business of the Company, the Surviving Corporation,
Parent or Merger Sub or any of their respective Subsidiaries, or
(y) that materially limits the freedom of action with
respect to, or ability to retain, any of the businesses,
services, or assets of the Company, the Surviving Corporation,
Parent or Merger Sub or any of their respective Subsidiaries.
Section 9.3. Certain
Filings. The Company and Parent shall
cooperate with one another (i) in connection with the
preparation of the Company Disclosure Documents and the
Form F-4,
(ii) in determining whether any action by or in respect of,
or filing with, any Governmental Authority is required, or any
actions, consents, approvals or waivers are required to be
obtained from parties to any material contracts, in connection
with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and (iii) in taking such actions or making any
such filings, furnishing information required in connection
therewith or with the Company Disclosure Documents or the
Form F-4
and seeking timely to obtain any such actions, consents,
approvals or waivers.
Section 9.4. Public
Announcements. Parent and the Company shall
consult with each other before issuing any press release, having
any communication with the press (whether or not for
attribution) or making any other public statement, or scheduling
any press conference or conference call with investors or
analysts, with respect to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby and, except in respect of any public
statement or press release as may be required by Applicable Law
or any listing agreement with or rule of any national securities
exchange or association, neither the Company nor Parent shall
issue any such press release or make any such other public
statement (including statements to the employees of the Company
or Parent, as the case may be, or any of their respective
Subsidiaries) or schedule any such press conference or
conference call without the consent of Parent.
Section 9.5. Further
Assurances. At and after the Effective Time,
the officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation shall be
authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Sub, any deeds, bills of sale, assignments
or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Sub, any other actions and things to vest,
perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving
Corporation any and all right, title and interest in, to and
under any of the rights, properties or assets of the Company
acquired or to be acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a
result of, or in connection with, the Merger.
Section 9.6. Stock
Exchange De-listing. Prior to the Effective
Time, the Company shall cooperate with Parent and use its
reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions, and do or cause to be done all things, reasonably
necessary, proper or advisable on its part under Applicable Laws
and rules and policies of Nasdaq to enable the de-listing by the
Surviving Corporation of the shares of Company Common Stock from
Nasdaq and the deregistration of the shares of Company Common
Stock under the 1934 Act as promptly as practicable after
the Effective Time, and in any event no more than ten days
thereafter.
Section 9.7. Takeover
Provisions. If any control share
acquisition, fair price,
moratorium or other antitakeover or similar statute
or regulation or provision of the articles of incorporation of
the Company shall become applicable to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement, each
of the Company, Parent and Merger Sub and the respective members
of their boards of directors and the Special Committee shall, to
the extent permitted by Applicable Law, use reasonable best
efforts to grant such approvals and to take such actions as are
reasonably necessary so that the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement may be consummated as
promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated herein and
otherwise to take all such other actions as are reasonably
necessary to eliminate or minimize the effects of any such
statute or regulation on the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 9.8. Notices
of Certain Events. Each of the Company and
Parent shall promptly notify the other of:
(a) any notice or other communication from any Person
alleging that the consent of such Person is or may be required
in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement;
(b) any notice or other communication from any Governmental
Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement;
A-37
(c) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or
proceedings commenced or, to its knowledge, threatened against,
relating to or involving or otherwise affecting the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries or Parent and any of its Subsidiaries,
as the case may be, that, if pending on the date of this
Agreement, would have been required to have been disclosed
pursuant to any Section of this Agreement;
(d) any inaccuracy of any representation or warranty
contained in this Agreement at any time during the term hereof
that could reasonably be expected to cause any of the conditions
set forth in Article X not to be satisfied; and
(e) any failure of that party to comply with or satisfy any
covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or
satisfied by it hereunder.
ARTICLE X
CONDITIONS
TO THE MERGER
Section 10.1. Conditions
to Obligations of Each Party. The respective
obligations of each party hereto to effect the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
(a) the Company Stockholder Approval shall have been
obtained in accordance with the MIBCA;
(b) no Applicable Law preventing or prohibiting the
consummation of the Merger shall be in effect; and
(c) (i) the
Form F-4
shall have become effective under the 1933 Act and shall
not be the subject of any stop order suspending the
effectiveness thereof or any proceedings seeking any such stop
order; and (ii) the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock
included in the Per Share Merger Consideration payable to the
holders of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger
shall have been approved for listing on Nasdaq, subject to the
completion of the Merger.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the conditions set forth in
clause (c) above need not be satisfied in connection with
any Closing after the Share Condition Waiver Time.
Section 10.2. Conditions
to Obligations of the Company. The
obligations of the Company to effect the Merger are further
subject to the satisfaction by Parent of the following
conditions:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of Parent
contained in Section 6.1, and
Section 6.2 of this Agreement (disregarding all
materiality, Parent Material Adverse Effect and Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect qualifications contained therein) shall
be true and correct in all material respects as of the Seller
Group Share Purchase Date (in connection with the Seller Group
Share Purchase Date) or the Closing Date (in connection with the
Closing), as applicable, as if made at and as of such time
(except to the extent any such representation and warranty by
its terms addresses matters only as of another specified time,
in which case such representation and warranty will be true and
correct in all material respects as of such other time),
(ii) the representations and warranties of Parent contained
in Section 6.7 of this Agreement shall be true and
correct as of the Seller Group Share Purchase Date (in
connection with the Seller Group Share Purchase Date) or the
Closing Date (in connection with the Closing), as applicable, as
if made at and as of such time (except to the extent any such
representation and warranty by its terms addresses matters only
as of another specified time, in which case such representation
and warranty will be true and correct as of such other time),
and (iii) all of the other representations and warranties
of Parent contained in this Agreement or in any certificate or
other writing delivered by Parent pursuant hereto (disregarding
all materiality, Parent Material Adverse Effect and Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect qualifications contained therein) shall
be true and correct as of the Seller Group Share Purchase Date
(in connection with the Seller Group Share Purchase Date) or the
Closing Date (in connection with the Closing), as applicable, as
if made at and as of such time (except to the extent any such
representation and warranty by its terms addresses matters only
as of another specified time, in which case such representation
and warranty will be true and correct as of such other time),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties
to be so true and correct does not have, and would be not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect or an Ocean Rig
Material Adverse Effect;
A-38
(b) Parent and Merger Sub shall have performed in all
material respects all of the obligations required to be
performed by them under this Agreement on or prior to the Seller
Group Share Purchase Date (in connection with the Seller Group
Share Purchase Date) or the Closing Date (in connection with the
Closing), as applicable;
(c) from the date hereof and through the Seller Group Share
Purchase Date (in connection with the Seller Group Share
Purchase Date) or the Closing Date (in connection with the
Closing), as applicable, there shall not have occurred any
event, change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of
facts that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse
Effect or an Ocean Rig Material Adverse Effect; and
(d) Parent shall have delivered to the Company as of the
Closing Date, a certificate, dated as of such date, executed by
an executive officer of Parent to the effect that the conditions
set forth in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of this
Section 10.2 have been satisfied as of the Closing
Date.
Section 10.3. Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. The
obligations of the Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger is
further subject to the satisfaction by the Company of the
following conditions:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of the
Company contained in Section 5.1,
Section 5.2, and Section 5.16 (relating
to Non-Compete Arrangements) of this Agreement (disregarding all
materiality and Company Material Adverse Effect qualifications
contained therein) shall be true and correct in all material
respects as of the Seller Group Share Purchase Date (or, if the
Seller Group Share Purchase Date shall not have previously
occurred, the Closing Date) as if made at and as of such time
(except to the extent any such representation and warranty by
its terms addresses matters only as of another specified time,
in which case such representation and warranty will be true and
correct in all material respects as of such other time),
(ii) the representations and warranties of the Company
contained in Section 5.4 of this Agreement shall be
true and correct as of the Seller Group Share Purchase Date (or,
if the Seller Group Share Purchase Date shall not have
previously occurred, the Closing Date) as if made at and as of
such time (except to the extent any such representation and
warranty by its terms addresses matters only as of another
specified time, in which case such representation and warranty
will be true and correct as of such other time), and
(iii) all of the other representations and warranties of
the Company contained in this Agreement or in any certificate or
other writing delivered by the Company pursuant hereto
(disregarding all materiality and Company Material Adverse
Effect qualifications contained therein) shall be true and
correct as of the Seller Group Share Purchase Date (or, if the
Seller Group Share Purchase Date shall not have previously
occurred, the Closing Date) as if made at and as of such time
(except to the extent any such representation and warranty by
its terms addresses matters only as of another specified time,
in which case such representation and warranty will be true and
correct as of such other time), except where the failure of such
representations and warranties to be so true and correct does
not have, and would be not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect;
(b) the Company shall have performed in all material
respects all of the obligations required to be performed by it
under this Agreement on or prior to the Seller Group Share
Purchase Date (in connection with the Seller Group Share
Purchase Date) or Closing Date (in connection with the Closing),
as applicable; and the Company shall have delivered to Parent on
the Closing Date a certificate, dated as of such date, executed
by an executive officer of the Company to the effect that the
condition set forth in this clause (b) shall be then
satisfied;
(c) from the date hereof through the Seller Group Share
Purchase Date (or, if the Seller Group Share Purchase Date shall
not have previously occurred, through the Closing Date), there
shall not have occurred any event, change, circumstance,
occurrence, effect or state of facts that has had, or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect; and
(d) the Company shall have delivered to Parent as of the
Seller Group Share Purchase Date (or, if the Seller Group Share
Purchase Date shall not have previously occurred, the Closing
Date) a certificate, dated as of such date, executed by an
executive officer of the Company to the effect that the
conditions set forth in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of
this Section 10.3 have been satisfied.
A-39
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the conditions set forth in this
Section 10.3 (other than clause (b)) need not be
satisfied in connection with any Closing after the Seller Group
Share Purchase Date.
ARTICLE XI
TERMINATION;
AMENDMENT; WAIVER
Section 11.1. Termination. This
Agreement may be terminated any time prior to the Effective Time
(notwithstanding the receipt of the Company Stockholder
Approval); provided that a majority vote of the Special
Committee shall be necessary for termination by the Company and
the Special Committee may prosecute any action related to this
Agreement and the Purchase Agreement on behalf of the Company:
(a) by mutual written agreement of the Company and
Parent; or
(b) by either the Company or Parent, if:
(i) the Effective Time shall not have occurred on or before
March 26, 2012 (the End Date); or
(ii) there shall be any Applicable Law that prohibits the
Company, Parent, or Merger Sub from consummating the Merger and
such prohibition shall have become final and
nonappealable; or
(c) by Parent, prior to the Seller Group Share Purchase
Date, if:
(i) an Adverse Recommendation Change shall have occurred;
(ii) the Company shall have entered into a binding
agreement (other than a confidentiality agreement contemplated
by Section 7.6(b)(i)) relating to any Acquisition
Proposal;
(iii) the Special Committee or the Company Board fails
publicly to reaffirm its recommendation of this Agreement or the
Merger within five (5) Business Days of receipt of a
written request by Parent or Merger Sub to provide such
reaffirmation following an Acquisition Proposal; or
(iv) the Company or any of its Representatives shall have
materially breached (or deemed pursuant to the terms thereof to
have materially breached) any of its obligations under
Section 7.6;
(d) by the Company, prior to the Scheduled Seller Group
Share Purchase Date, in accordance with
Section 7.6(b)(iii), provided that the
Company pays to Parent the amount due pursuant to
Section 12.4(b) in accordance with the terms
specified therein, and immediately following termination of this
Agreement the Company enters into a definitive agreement with
respect to a Superior Proposal;
(e) by the Company, if Parent and Merger Sub shall have
breached or failed to perform any of its covenants or
obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement,
if any representation or warranty of Parent and Merger Sub shall
have become untrue or if any other event, change, circumstance,
occurrence, effect or state of facts shall have occurred, in
each case which breach or failure to perform or to be true or
any events, changes, circumstances, occurrences, effects or
states of facts, individually or in the aggregate has resulted
or would reasonably be expected to result in a failure of a
condition set forth in Section 10.2 (such
circumstance, a Material Parent Breach), and
such Material Parent Breach cannot be or, to the extent curable
by Parent or Merger Sub, has not been cured by the earlier of
(1) the End Date and (2) twenty (20) days after
the giving of written notice to Parent of such breach or
failure; and
(f) by Parent,
(i) if the Company shall have breached or failed to perform
any of its covenants or obligations required to be performed by
it under this Agreement (other than the covenants or obligations
set forth in Section 7.6, in respect of which
Section 11.1(c)(iv) shall apply), which breach or
failure to perform, individually or in the aggregate has
resulted or would reasonably be expected to result in a failure
of a condition set forth in Section 10.3(b) (such
circumstance, a Material Company Breach of
Covenant), and such Material Company Breach of
Covenant cannot be or, to the extent curable by the Company, has
not been cured by the earlier of (1) the End Date and
(2) twenty (20) days after the giving of written
notice to the Company of such breach or failure, or
A-40
(ii) on or prior to the Seller Group Share Purchase Date,
if any representation or warranty of the Company shall have
become untrue or if any other event, change, circumstance,
occurrence, effect or state of facts shall have occurred, in
each case which failure to be true or any events, changes,
circumstances, occurrences, effects or states of facts,
individually or in the aggregate has resulted or would
reasonably be expected to result in a failure of a condition set
forth in Section 10.3 (such circumstance, a
Material Company Breach), and such Material
Company Breach cannot be or, to the extent curable by the
Company, has not been cured by the earlier of (1) the End
Date and (2) twenty (20) days after the giving of
written notice to the Company of such failure.
The party desiring to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 11.1 (other than pursuant to
Section 11.1(a)) shall give written notice of such
termination to the other party.
Section 11.2. Effect
of Termination. If this Agreement is
terminated pursuant to Section 11.1, this Agreement
shall become void and of no effect without liability of any
party (or any stockholder, director, officer, employee, agent,
consultant or representative of such party) to the other party
hereto; provided that, if such termination shall result
from the intentional breach by a party of its obligations
hereunder, such party shall be fully liable for any and all
liabilities and damages incurred or suffered by the other party
as a result of such failure. For purposes hereof, an
intentional breach means a material breach that is a
consequence of an act undertaken by the breaching party with the
intention of breaching the applicable obligation. The provisions
of this Section 11.2 and Sections 12.1,
12.4, 12.7, 12.8 and 12.9 shall
survive any termination hereof pursuant to
Section 11.1.
ARTICLE XII
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 12.1. Notices. All
notices, requests and other communications to any party
hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile transmission)
and shall be given,
if to Parent or Merger Sub, to:
DryShips Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion 15125
Athens Greece
Attention: Pankaj Khanna
Facsimile No.: 30 2108090577
with a copy to:
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
One New York Plaza
New York, New York 10004
Attention: Philip Richter, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
(212) 859-4000
and
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
99 City Road
London, EC1Y 1AX, England
Attention: Robert Mollen, Esq.
Facsimile No.: 011.44.20.7972.9602
A-41
if to the Company, to:
Special Committee
Attention: John Liveris
c/o Oceanfreight
Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion 15125
Athens Greece
Facsimile No.: 302106140284
with a copy to:
Seward & Kissel LLP
One Battery Park Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attention: James Abbott, Esq. / Gary J. Wolfe, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
(212) 480-8421
or to such other address or facsimile number as such party may
hereafter specify for the purpose by notice to the other parties
hereto. All such notices, requests and other communications
shall be deemed received on the date of receipt by the recipient
thereof if received prior to 5:00 p.m. on a business day in
the place of receipt. Otherwise, any such notice, request or
communication shall be deemed to have been received on the next
succeeding business day in the place of receipt.
Section 12.2. Survival
of Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties contained herein and in any
certificate or other writing delivered pursuant hereto shall not
survive the Effective Time.
Section 12.3. Amendments
and Waivers.
(a) Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or
waived prior to the Effective Time if, but only if, such
amendment or waiver is in writing and is signed, in the case of
an amendment, by each party to this Agreement or, in the case of
a waiver, by each party against whom the waiver is to be
effective; provided that (i) any such amendment
shall require the approval of a majority of the Special
Committee, and (ii) after the Company Stockholder Approval
has been obtained there shall be no amendment or waiver that
would require the further approval of the stockholders of the
Company under the MIBCA unless such amendment is subject to
stockholder approval.
(b) No failure or delay by any party in exercising any
right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver
thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right, power or privilege. The rights and remedies
herein provided shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any
rights or remedies provided by Applicable Law.
Section 12.4. Expenses.
(a) General. Except as otherwise
provided herein, all costs and expenses incurred in connection
with this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such
cost or expense.
(b) Termination Fee.
(i) If this Agreement is terminated by Parent pursuant to
Section 11.1(c) or by the Company pursuant to
Section 11.1(d), then the Company shall pay to
Parent in immediately available funds the Termination Fee, in
the case of a termination by Parent, within two Business Days
after such termination and, in the case of a termination by the
Company, at the time of such termination. Termination
Fee means $4.5 million in cash.
(ii) If (A) this Agreement is terminated by Parent
pursuant to Section 11.1(f), (B) prior to
termination of this Agreement an Acquisition Proposal (with 45%
being substituted for references to 15% in the definition
thereof for the purposes of this
Section 12.4(b)(ii)) shall have been made, and
(C) prior to the first anniversary of the date of such
termination, the Company enters into a definitive agreement with
respect to or recommends to its shareholders any Acquisition
Proposal or any Acquisition Proposal shall have been
consummated, then
A-42
the Company shall pay the Termination Fee to Parent in
immediately available funds within two Business Days after the
occurrence of the last of the events described in clauses (A),
(B) and (C) of this Section 12.4(b)(ii).
(c) Other Costs and Expenses. The
Company acknowledges that the agreements contained in this
Section 12.4 are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that, without
these agreements, Parent and Merger Sub would not enter into
this Agreement. Accordingly, if the Company fails promptly to
pay any amount due to Parent pursuant to this
Section 12.4, it shall also pay any costs and
expenses incurred by Parent or Merger Sub in connection with a
legal action to enforce this Agreement that results in a
judgment against the Company for such amount, together with
interest on the amount of any unpaid fee, cost or expense at the
publicly announced prime rate of Citibank, N.A. from the date
such fee, cost or expense was required to be paid to (but
excluding) the payment date.
(d) Parent and Merger Sub agree that, upon any termination
of this Agreement under circumstances where the Termination Fee
is payable by the Company pursuant to this Section and such
Termination Fee is paid in full, Parent and Merger Sub shall be
precluded from any other remedy against the Company, at law or
in equity or otherwise, and neither Parent nor Merger Sub shall
seek to obtain any recovery, judgment, or damages of any kind,
including consequential, indirect, or punitive damages, against
the Company or any of the Companys Subsidiaries or any of
their respective directors, officers, employees, partners,
managers, members, shareholders or Affiliates or their
respective Representatives in connection with this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 12.5. Disclosure
Schedules. The parties hereto agree that any
reference in a particular Section of the Company Disclosure
Schedule shall be deemed to be an exception to (or, as
applicable, a disclosure for purposes of) the representations
and warranties (or covenants, as applicable) of the Company that
are contained in the corresponding Section of this Agreement and
any other representations and warranties of the Company that are
contained in this Agreement to which the relevance of such item
thereto is reasonably apparent. The mere inclusion of an item in
the Company Disclosure Schedule as an exception to (or, as
applicable, a disclosure for purposes of) a representation or
warranty shall not be deemed an admission that such item
represents a material exception or material fact, event or
circumstance or that such item has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 12.6. Waiver. At
any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after
the Company Stockholder Meeting, Parent (on behalf of itself and
Merger Sub) may (a) extend the time for the performance of
any of the covenants, obligations or other acts of the Company,
or (b) waive any inaccuracy of any representations or
warranties or compliance with any of the agreements, covenants
or conditions of the Company or with any conditions to its own
obligations. Any agreement on the part of Parent (on behalf of
itself and Merger Sub) to any such extension or waiver will be
valid only if such waiver is set forth in an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of Parent by its duly authorized
officer. At any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before
or after the Company Stockholder Meeting, the Company may
(a) extend the time for the performance of any of the
covenants, obligations or other acts of Parent or Merger Sub, or
(b) waive any inaccuracy of any representations or
warranties or compliance with any of the agreements, covenants
or conditions of Parent or Merger Sub, or with any conditions to
its own obligations. Any agreement on the part of the Company to
any such extension or waiver will be valid only if such waiver
is set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of the
Company by its duly authorized officer. The failure of any party
to this Agreement to assert any of its rights under this
Agreement or otherwise will not constitute a waiver of such
rights. The waiver of any such right with respect to particular
facts and other circumstances will not be deemed a waiver with
respect to any other facts and circumstances, and each such
right will be deemed an ongoing right that may be asserted at
any time and from time to time.
Section 12.7. Governing
Law. This Agreement will be deemed to be made
in and in all respects will be interpreted, construed and
governed by and in accordance with the Laws of the State of New
York without giving effect to any choice of Law or conflict of
Law provision or rule that would cause the application of the
Laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York,
except to the extent that the law of the Marshall Islands is
mandatorily applicable to the Merger.
Section 12.8. Jurisdiction. EACH
OF THE PARTIES HERETO CONSENTS TO THE JURISDICTION OF ANY STATE
OR FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN MANHATTAN IN NEW YORK CITY OR IN THE
FEDERAL SOUTHERN DISTRICT IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND ANY
APPELLATE COURT
A-43
THEREFROM LOCATED IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK AND IRREVOCABLY AGREES
THAT ALL ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE
MERGER OR THE OTHER TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT
MAY BE LITIGATED IN SUCH COURTS. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO
ACCEPTS FOR ITSELF AND IN CONNECTION WITH ITS RESPECTIVE
PROPERTIES, GENERALLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY, THE JURISDICTION OF
THE AFORESAID COURTS AND WAIVES ANY DEFENSE OF FORUM NON
CONVENIENS, AND IRREVOCABLY AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ANY FINAL AND
NONAPPEALABLE JUDGMENT RENDERED THEREBY IN CONNECTION WITH THIS
AGREEMENT, THE MERGER OR THE OTHER TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY
THIS AGREEMENT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER IRREVOCABLY
CONSENTS TO THE SERVICE OF PROCESS OUT OF ANY OF THE
AFOREMENTIONED COURTS IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING BY THE
MAILING OF COPIES THEREOF BY REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL,
POSTAGE PREPAID, TO SUCH PARTY AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED IN THIS
AGREEMENT, SUCH SERVICE TO BECOME EFFECTIVE 15 CALENDAR DAYS
AFTER SUCH MAILING. NOTHING HEREIN WILL IN ANY WAY BE DEEMED TO
LIMIT THE ABILITY OF ANY PARTY HERETO TO SERVE ANY SUCH LEGAL
PROCESS, SUMMONS, NOTICES AND DOCUMENTS IN ANY OTHER MANNER
PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR TO OBTAIN JURISDICTION OVER OR TO
BRING ACTIONS, SUITS OR PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ANY OTHER PARTY
HERETO IN SUCH OTHER JURISDICTIONS, AND IN SUCH MANNER, AS MAY
BE PERMITTED BY ANY APPLICABLE LAW.
Section 12.9. WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO
HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN
ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT
OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
Section 12.10. Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be signed
in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an
original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and
hereto were upon the same instrument. This Agreement shall
become effective when each party hereto shall have received a
counterpart hereof signed by all of the other parties hereto.
Until and unless each party has received a counterpart hereof
signed by the other party hereto, this Agreement shall have no
effect and no party shall have any right or obligation hereunder
(whether by virtue of any other oral or written agreement or
other communication).
Section 12.11. Entire
Agreement. This Agreement and the
Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement
between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this
Agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings, both oral and written, between the parties with
respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
Section 12.12. Severability. If
any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Agreement
is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or other
Governmental Authority to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the
remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions
of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and
shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated so long as
the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated
hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any
party. Upon such a determination, the parties shall negotiate in
good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original
intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable
manner in order that the transactions contemplated hereby be
consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent
possible.
Section 12.13. Specific
Performance. The parties hereto agree that
irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this
Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof
and that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce
specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof
in any federal court located in the State of New York or any New
York state court, in addition to any other remedy to which they
are entitled at law or in equity.
Section 12.14. Headings. The
descriptive headings contained in this Agreement are included
for convenience of reference only and will not affect in any way
the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Section 12.15. Construction. The
parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and
drafting of this Agreement, and, in the event an ambiguity or
question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement will
be
A-44
construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no
presumption or burden of proof will arise favoring or
disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the
provisions of this Agreement.
Section 12.16. Binding
Effect; Benefit; Assignment.
(a) The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon
and, except as provided in Section 8.3, shall inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns. Except as provided in
Section 8.3, no provision of this Agreement is
intended to confer any rights, benefits, remedies, obligations
or liabilities hereunder upon any Person other than the parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
(b) No party may assign, delegate or otherwise transfer any
of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the
consent of each other party hereto, except that Parent or Merger
Sub may transfer or assign its rights and obligations under this
Agreement, in whole or from time to time in part, to one or more
of its Affiliates at any time and, after the Effective Time, to
any Person.
[REMAINDER
OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
A-45
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed by their respective authorized
officers as of the date first above written.
DRYSHIPS INC.
Name: Pankaj Khanna
PELICAN STOCKHOLDINGS INC.
Name: Pankaj Khanna
OCEANFREIGHT INC.
Name: Demetris Nenes
[Signature
Page to the Agreement and Plan of Merger]
A-46
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
DISCLOSURE SCHEDULES
(the Company Disclosure Schedules)
[SCHEDULE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK]
A-47
Annex B
Execution Version
PURCHASE
AND SALE AGREEMENT
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this Agreement),
is made and entered into as of July 26, 2011, by and among
Basset Holdings Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
the Republic of the Marshall Islands
(Basset), Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a
corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands (Steel Wheel), Haywood
Finance Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the
Republic of the Marshall Islands (Haywood
and, together with Basset and Steel Wheel, the
Sellers), OceanFreight Inc., a corporation
organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands
(the Company) and DryShips Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands (the Purchaser).
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings
assigned to them in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as
of the date of this Agreement (together with any amendments or
supplements thereto, the Merger Agreement),
by and among the Company, the Purchaser and Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
the Republic of the Marshall Islands that is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Purchaser (Merger Sub).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, (i) Basset owns 866,666 shares (the
Basset Shares) of common stock, par value
$0.01 of the Company (Common Stock);
(ii) Steel Wheel owns 351,333 shares (the
Steel Wheel Shares) of Common Stock; and
(iii) Haywood owns 1,782,857 shares (the
Haywood Shares and, together with the Steel
Wheel Shares and the Basset Shares, the Seller
Shares) of Common Stock;
WHEREAS, Basset, Steel Wheel and Haywood are each Controlled by
Mr. Antonis Kandylidis
(Mr. Kandylidis);
WHEREAS, the Purchaser wishes to purchase from the Sellers, and
the Sellers wish to sell to the Purchaser, all of the Seller
Shares on the terms and subject to the conditions of this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, simultaneously herewith, the Company, the Purchaser and
Merger Sub, are entering into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to
which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof,
Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, and the
Company will be the surviving corporation in accordance with the
Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act (the
Merger).
ACCORDINGLY, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Sale and Purchase of Shares. On
the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this
Agreement, the Purchaser shall purchase from each of the
Sellers, and each of the Sellers shall sell to the Purchaser,
free and clear of any pledges, liens, claims, security
interests, encumbrances, options, proxies, voting agreements or
any other rights of third parties of any kind
(Liens), all of the Seller Shares owned by
such Seller, for consideration per share consisting of
(x) $11.25 net to the Sellers in cash without interest
(less any applicable withholding taxes) and
(y) 0.52326 shares of common stock (the Ocean
Rig Common Stock) of Ocean Rig UDW Inc.
(Ocean Rig), (such consideration, with
respect to the Seller Shares of each Seller, the
Purchase Consideration). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no fractions of a share of Ocean Rig Common Stock
shall be paid to a Seller, but in lieu thereof each Seller
otherwise entitled to a fraction of a share of Ocean Rig Common
Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount of cash (without
interest) determined by multiplying $21.50 by the fractional
share interest to which such Seller would otherwise be entitled.
2. Payment; Delivery of
Shares. The Purchase Consideration payable to
each Seller for its Seller Shares shall be paid by the Purchaser
to the applicable Seller at the Seller Closing (as herein after
defined) (x) with respect to the cash portion, by wire
transfer of immediately available funds from the Purchaser to
one or more bank accounts of the Sellers for which wiring
instructions shall be provided by such Seller to the Purchaser
at least two (2) business
B-1
days prior to the Seller Closing, and (y) with respect to
the share portion, by delivery by the Purchaser to such Seller
of stock certificate or certificates (endorsed to such Seller)
representing the applicable number of shares of Ocean Rig Common
Stock, together with any documents that, in the reasonable
judgment of each Seller, are necessary to transfer and convey
to, and vest in, the Seller such number of shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock, free and clear of all Liens (other than
restrictions under the securities laws (including the
restrictions described in Section 7.9 hereof) and the
restriction under Section 9.8 hereof). At the Seller
Closing, each of the Sellers shall deliver to the Purchaser a
stock certificate or certificates (endorsed to the Purchaser)
representing the Seller Shares of such Seller, together with any
documents that, in the reasonable judgment of the Purchaser, are
necessary to transfer and convey to, and vest in, the Purchaser
good and valid title to such Seller Shares, free and clear of
all Liens (other than restrictions under the securities laws).
The Purchaser shall not be obligated to purchase any of the
Seller Shares at the Seller Closing unless all of the Seller
Shares have been delivered by the Sellers in accordance with
this Section 2.
3. Seller Closing; Mutual Option.
(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 12, the
closing of the purchase and sale of the Seller Shares hereunder
(the Seller Closing) shall take place one
(1) Business Day after the date the conditions set forth in
Section 12 (other than conditions that by their nature are
to be satisfied at the Seller Closing, but subject to the
satisfaction or, to the extent permissible, waiver of those
conditions at the Seller Closing) have been satisfied or, to the
extent permissible, waived by the party or parties entitled to
the benefit of such conditions. The Seller Closing shall occur
at the headquarters of the Purchaser, 80 Kifissias Avenue,
Amaroussion, 15125 Athens, Greece or such other location as
shall be agreed by the Purchaser and the Sellers. The date on
which the Seller Closing occurs in accordance with this
Agreement is referred to in this Agreement as the
Seller Closing Date. Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary in this Agreement, the Seller Closing Date shall
not be prior to 5:00 P.M. Greece time on August 23,
2011.
(b) In the event the Share Condition Waiver Time shall
occur and the Per Share Merger Consideration shall be converted
to $22.50 in cash, (i) each of the Sellers or its Designee
(as defined in Section 14 below) shall have the option,
exercisable on and from the Effective Time until 25 days
after the Effective Time, to sell to the Purchaser for a price
of $21.50 in cash per share all or part of the shares of Ocean
Rig Common Stock delivered to such Seller pursuant to
Section 2 hereof, and such Seller or its Designee shall
transfer such shares to the Purchaser, and the Purchaser shall
purchase such shares, promptly, and in any event within three
(3) Business Days of receipt of written notice from such
Seller or such Sellers Designee of the exercise of such
Sellers or Designees option under this
Section 3(b)(i); and (ii) the Purchaser shall have the
option, exercisable on and from the Effective Time until
25 days after the Effective Time, to acquire for a price of
$21.50 in cash per share from each of the Sellers or its
Designee all or part of the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock
delivered to such Seller pursuant to Section 2 hereof, and
such Seller or its Designee shall transfer such shares to the
Purchaser, and the Purchaser shall purchase such shares,
promptly, and in any event within three (3) Business Days
of receipt of written notice from the Purchaser of the exercise
of the Purchasers option under this Section 3(b)(ii).
In case any of the Sellers or its Designee or the Purchaser
exercises its respective right, such Seller or its Designee, as
applicable shall deliver to the Purchaser a stock certificate or
certificates (endorsed to the Purchaser) representing the shares
of Ocean Rig Common Stock of such Seller or its Designee, as
applicable, together with any documents that, in the reasonable
judgment of the Purchaser, are necessary to transfer and convey
to, and vest in, the Purchaser good and valid title to such
shares, free and clear of all Liens (other than restrictions
under the securities laws), and the Purchaser shall,
simultaneously with the delivery of such shares, pay the
consideration to such Seller or its Designee, as applicable, by
wire transfer of immediately available funds to one or more bank
accounts of such Seller or its Designee, as applicable, for
which wiring instructions shall be provided by such Seller or
its Designee, as applicable, to the Purchaser.
4. Documentation and
Information. Each party (a) consents to
and authorizes the publication and disclosure by the other
parties of the other parties identity and holding of
Seller Shares, Mr. Kandylidis identity and beneficial
ownership of the capital stock of the Sellers, the nature of the
other parties commitments, arrangements and understandings
under this Agreement (including, for the avoidance of doubt, the
disclosure of this Agreement) and any information that each
other party reasonably determines is required to be disclosed by
such party under Applicable Law in any press release and any
disclosure documents in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby or by the Merger Agreement and
(b) agree to promptly give to the other parties any
information such other parties may reasonably require for the
preparation of any such disclosure documents. Each party agrees
to
B-2
promptly notify the other parties of any required corrections
with respect to any information supplied by such party
specifically for use in any such disclosure document, if and to
the extent that any such information shall be or have become
false or misleading in any material respect.
5. Voting Agreement; Irrevocable Proxy
5.1 From the date hereof until termination of this
Agreement in accordance with Section 13 hereof, each of the
Sellers hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that at
any meeting (whether annual or special and whether or not an
adjourned or postponed meeting) of the holders of Common Stock,
however called (each, a Stockholder Meeting),
or in any other circumstance in which the vote, consent or other
approval of the holders of Common Stock is sought (in writing or
otherwise), such Seller, as applicable, shall:
(a) be present, in person or represented by proxy, or
otherwise cause its Seller Shares or any other shares of Common
Stock that it or any of its Affiliates may at any time
beneficially own directly or indirectly to be counted for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at such meeting
to the fullest extent that its Seller Shares (or such other
shares) shall be entitled to be present at such meeting; and
(b) vote (or cause to be voted) all of its Seller Shares or
any other shares of Common Stock that it or any of its
Affiliates may at any time beneficially own directly or
indirectly, or execute and deliver a written consent (or cause a
written consent to be executed and delivered) with respect to
all of its Seller Shares or any such other shares of Common
Stock that it or any of its Affiliates may at any time
beneficially own directly or indirectly, in connection with any
meeting of the stockholders of the Company or any action by
written consent in lieu of a meeting of stockholders of the
Company, in each case, to the fullest extent that its Seller
Shares or such other shares shall be entitled to be voted at the
time of any vote or action by written consent:
(i) in favor of (A) approval and adoption of the
Merger Agreement, the Merger and each of the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement and, (B) without
limiting the preceding clause (A), the approval of any proposal
to adjourn or postpone the Stockholder Meeting at which such
approval and adoption is to be sought at a later date if there
are not sufficient votes for approval and adoption of the Merger
Agreement on the date on which such Stockholder Meeting (or any
adjournment or postponement thereof) is held; and
(ii) only as directed by the Purchaser with respect to
(A) any proposal, action, transaction or contract that
would reasonably be expected to (x) frustrate the purposes
of, impede, hinder, interfere with, nullify, prevent, delay or
adversely affect the purchase or sale of the Seller Shares
hereunder, the Merger or any other transactions contemplated
hereby or by the Merger Agreement, (y) result in a breach
of any covenant, representation or warranty or any other
obligation or agreement of the Company or the Sellers under this
Agreement or the Merger Agreement (including, in the case of any
representation or warranty, as if such representation or
warranty was repeated at all times up to and including the
Effective Time), or (z) result in any of the conditions set
forth in Article X of the Merger Agreement not being
fulfilled or satisfied, (B) any Acquisition Proposal and
any action in furtherance of any Acquisition Proposal,
(C) any merger, acquisition, sale, consolidation,
reorganization, recapitalization, dissolution, liquidation or
winding up of or by the Company, or any other extraordinary
transaction involving the Company, and (D) subject to
compliance with Section 8.2(b) of the Merger Agreement, any
change in the business, management or the board of directors of
the Company.
5.2 Each of the Sellers hereby revokes (or agrees to cause
to be revoked) any proxies that it or he may have heretofore
granted and hereby irrevocably appoints the Purchaser as
attorney-in-fact and proxy for and on behalf of such Seller, for
and in the name, place and stead of such Seller, to
(a) attend any and all Stockholder Meetings, (b) vote,
express consent or dissent or issue instructions to the record
holder to vote its Seller Shares, or any other shares of Common
Stock that it or any of its Affiliates may at any time
beneficially own directly or indirectly, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 5.1 (b) hereof at any such
meeting and (c) grant or withhold, or issue instructions to
the record holder to grant or withhold, consistent with the
provisions of Section 5.1, all written consents with
respect to its Seller Shares or any other shares of Common Stock
that it or any of its Affiliates may at any time beneficially
own directly or indirectly. The foregoing proxy shall be deemed
to be a proxy coupled with an interest, is irrevocable and shall
not be terminated by operation of Applicable Law or upon the
occurrence of any
B-3
other event other than the termination of this Agreement in
accordance with Section 13 hereof. Each of the Sellers
authorizes such attorney and proxy to substitute any other
person to act hereunder, to revoke any substitution and to file
this proxy and any substitution or revocation with the Secretary
of the Company. Each of the Sellers hereby affirms that the
irrevocable proxy set forth in this Section 5.2 is given in
connection with and granted in consideration of and as an
inducement to the Purchaser and Merger Sub to enter into the
Merger Agreement and that such irrevocable proxy is given to
secure the obligations of the Sellers under Section 5.1.
The Purchaser covenants and agrees with the Sellers that the
Purchaser will exercise the foregoing proxy consistent with the
provisions of Section 5.1.
5.3 The parties hereto hereby agree and acknowledge that
neither any other party hereto, nor such partys respective
successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees,
officers, directors, shareholders, agents or affiliates shall
owe any duty to, whether in law or otherwise, or incur any
liability of any kind whatsoever, including without limitation,
with respect to any and all claims, losses, demands, causes of
actions, costs, expenses (including attorneys fees) and
compensation of any kind or nature whatsoever to any other party
hereto or its affiliates in connection with or as a result of
any voting by the Purchaser of the Seller Shares, or any other
shares of Common Stock that the Sellers or their affiliates may
at any time beneficially own directly or indirectly, as
contemplated hereby. The parties hereto acknowledge that,
pursuant to the authority hereby granted under the proxy, the
Purchaser may vote the Seller Shares, or any other shares of
Common Stock that the Sellers or their Affiliates may at any
time beneficially own directly or indirectly, in furtherance of
its own interests, and the Purchaser is not acting as a
fiduciary of the Sellers, any affiliates of any Seller, or the
Company.
6. Representations and Warranties of the
Purchaser. The Purchaser represents and
warrants to each of the Sellers as follows:
6.1 The Purchaser is duly organized, validly existing and
in good standing under the applicable laws of the Republic of
the Marshall Islands;
6.2 The Purchaser has the power and authority to execute,
deliver and carry out the terms and provisions of this Agreement
and consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, and has
taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery
and performance of this Agreement;
6.3 This Agreement has been duly and validly authorized,
executed and delivered by the Purchaser and, assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by and on behalf of each
the other parties hereto, constitutes a legal, valid and binding
agreement of the Purchaser, enforceable in accordance with its
terms;
6.4 The Ocean Rig Common Stock to be delivered to the
Sellers hereunder has been duly and validly issued and will be
delivered to the Sellers free of any Liens and restrictions on
transfer (except as provided hereunder and under the securities
laws) and preemptive rights;
6.5 No Person will have, as a result of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, any right, interest or claim
against or upon the Sellers for any commission, fee or other
compensation pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or
understanding entered into by or on behalf of the Purchaser;
6.6 The execution and delivery of this Agreement do not,
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
will not, (i) result in the imposition of any Liens under,
cause or permit the acceleration of any obligation under, or
violate or conflict with the terms, conditions or provisions of,
any note, indenture, security agreement, lease, guaranty, joint
venture agreement, or other contract, agreement or instrument to
which the Purchaser or Ocean Rig is a party or by which it,
Ocean Rig or any of the Ocean Rig Common Stock to be delivered
hereunder is subject or bound, or (ii) result in a breach
or violation by the Purchaser or Ocean Rig of any law, rule or
regulation or any order, injunction, judgment or decree of any
Governmental Authority to which Purchaser or Ocean Rig is a
party or by which either the Purchaser or Ocean Rig or any of
the Ocean Rig Common Stock to be delivered hereunder is subject
or bound, except as would not reasonably be expected to
materially impair the ability of the Purchaser to perform its
obligations under this Agreement.
6.7 The Purchaser has such knowledge and experience in
financial and business matters and in buying equity securities
that it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the
acquisition of the Seller Shares in exchange for Ocean Rig
Common Stock pursuant to Section 2 hereof, and it is able
to bear the economic risk of
B-4
such acquisition and is able to sustain a complete loss with
regard to such acquisition. The Purchaser acknowledge that
(x) it has had access to all such information regarding the
Company and the Seller Shares and has made all such
investigation with respect thereto as it deems necessary or
appropriate to make the decision to enter into this Agreement,
and it has satisfied itself concerning the relevant tax, legal,
currency and other economic considerations relevant to the
acquisition of the Seller Shares, (y) it has had the
opportunity to ask questions to the Sellers and the Company
concerning the Company and the Seller Shares and (z) in
making its decision to enter into this Agreement, it has relied
and will rely on its own investigation and, to the extent it
deems appropriate, on consultations with its independent
advisors. The Purchaser is an accredited investor
within the meaning of Rule 501 under the 1933 Act. The
Purchaser is acquiring the Seller Shares for its own the account
only for investment purposes and not with a view to any resale
or distribution, within the meaning of the U.S. securities
laws, of such shares. The Purchaser understands that the Seller
Shares delivered to it pursuant to Section 1 hereof are
restricted securities as defined in
Rule 144(a)(3) under the 1933 Act. The Purchaser
agrees that so long as such shares are restricted securities,
such shares may not be reoffered, resold, pledged or otherwise
transferred except (i) to the Company, (ii) pursuant
to a registration statement that has been declared effective
under the 1933 Act, (iii) outside the United States in
an offshore transaction in accordance with Rule 903 or 904
of Regulation S under the 1933 Act or
(iv) pursuant to any other available exemption from the
registration requirements of the 1933 Act, and, in each
case, such offer, sale, pledge or transfer must be made in
accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, including
any applicable securities laws of any state of the United
States. The Company has the right to place legends on the stock
certificates to the effect that the shares delivered to The
Purchaser are subject to the restrictions of this
Section 6.7.
7. Representations and Warranties of the
Sellers. The Sellers, jointly and severally,
represent and warrant to the Purchaser as follows:
7.1 Each of the Sellers is duly organized, validly existing
and in good standing under the applicable laws of the
jurisdiction in which it is incorporated or constituted;
7.2 Each of the Sellers has the necessary legal capacity,
power and authority to execute, deliver and carry out the terms
and provisions of this Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby and has taken all necessary
action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement;
7.3 This Agreement has been duly and validly authorized,
executed and delivered by each of the Sellers and, assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by and on behalf of the
Purchaser, constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of
each of the Sellers, enforceable in accordance with its terms;
7.4 Mr. Kandylidis is the Controlling stockholder of
each Seller; Basset owns, beneficially and of record, all of the
Basset Shares; Steel Wheel owns, beneficially and of record, all
of the Steel Wheel Shares; and Haywood owns, beneficially and of
record, all of the Haywood Shares; in each case, free and clear
of any Liens, and each of the Sellers will transfer to the
Purchaser good and valid title to the Seller Shares free and
clear of any Liens at the Seller Closing;
7.5 Neither the Sellers nor any Affiliates of any Seller
own beneficially or otherwise, directly or indirectly, any
shares of Common Stock (other than the Seller Shares) or any
options, warrants or other rights to acquire, currently, in the
future or upon the occurrence of certain events shares of Common
Stock;
7.6 The execution and delivery of this Agreement do not,
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
will not, (i) result in the imposition of any Liens under,
cause or permit the acceleration of any obligation under, or
violate or conflict with the terms, conditions or provisions of,
any note, indenture, security agreement, lease, guaranty, joint
venture agreement, or other contract, agreement or instrument to
which any of the Sellers or Mr. Kandylidis is a party or by
which any of the Sellers or Mr. Kandylidis or any of the
Seller Shares is subject or bound, or (ii) result in a
breach or violation by any of the Sellers or Mr. Kandylidis
of any law, rule or regulation or any order, injunction,
judgment or decree of any court, regulatory agency or other
governmental authority (individually and collectively, a
Governmental Authority) to which any of the
Sellers or Mr. Kandylidis is a party or by which any of the
Sellers or Mr. Kandylidis or any of the Seller Shares is
subject or bound;
B-5
7.7 Except in respect of the matters addressed in
Sections 8.1 and 8.2 hereof, there exists no restriction
upon the sale and delivery to the Purchaser of the Seller Shares
by any of the Sellers, nor are any of the Sellers required to
obtain the approval of any person or entity or any court,
governmental authority or regulatory agency to effect the sale
of the Seller Shares in accordance with the terms hereof;
7.8 Except as set forth in Section 22 hereof, no
Person will have, as a result of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement, any right, interest or claim against or upon
the Purchaser or the Company for any commission, fee or other
compensation pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or
understanding entered into by or on behalf of any of the Sellers
or Mr. Kandylidis; and
7.9 Each of the Sellers has such knowledge and experience
in financial and business matters and in buying equity
securities that each is capable of evaluating the merits and
risks of the acquisition of shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock in
exchange for Seller Shares pursuant to Section 2 hereof,
and each is able to bear the economic risk of such acquisition
and is able to sustain a complete loss with regard to such
acquisition. The Sellers acknowledge that (x) they have had
access to all such information regarding Ocean Rig and Ocean Rig
Common Stock and have made all such investigation with respect
thereto as they deem necessary or appropriate to make the
decision to enter into this Agreement, and they have satisfied
themselves concerning the relevant tax, legal, currency and
other economic considerations relevant to the acquisition of
shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock, (y) they have had the
opportunity to ask questions to the Purchaser concerning Ocean
Rig and Ocean Rig Common Stock and (z) in making their
decision to enter into this Agreement, they have relied and will
rely on their own investigation and, to the extent they deem
appropriate, on consultations with their independent advisors.
Each of the Sellers is an accredited investor within
the meaning of Rule 501 under the 1933 Act. The
Sellers are acquiring the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock for
their own account only for investment purposes and not with a
view to any resale or distribution, within the meaning of the
U.S. securities laws, of such shares. The Sellers
understand that the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock delivered
to them pursuant to Section 2 hereof are restricted
securities as defined in Rule 144(a)(3) under the
1933 Act. The Sellers agree that so long as such shares are
restricted securities, such shares may not be reoffered, resold,
pledged or otherwise transferred except (i) to Ocean Rig,
(ii) pursuant to a registration statement that has been
declared effective under the 1933 Act, (iii) outside
the United States in an offshore transaction in accordance with
Rule 903 or 904 of Regulation S under the
1933 Act or (iv) pursuant to any other available
exemption from the registration requirements of the
1933 Act, and, in each case, such offer, sale, pledge or
transfer must be made in accordance with all applicable laws and
regulations, including any applicable securities laws of any
state of the United States. The Purchaser may place (or cause to
be placed) legends on the stock certificates representing the
shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock being delivered to the Sellers
hereunder to the effect that the shares delivered to the Sellers
are subject to the restrictions of this Section 7.9 and
Section 9.7 hereof.
8. Representations of the Company.
8.1 The Company has irrevocably taken all action required
to be taken by it in order to exempt this Agreement and
completion of the transactions contemplated hereby from, and
this Agreement is and the transactions contemplated hereby will
be, exempt from the requirements of any moratorium,
control share, fair price,
affiliate transaction, business
combination or other anti-takeover laws and regulations of
any Governmental Authority or contained in the Companys
articles of incorporation or by-laws.
8.2 The Company has irrevocably taken all action necessary
or appropriate so that the execution of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby do not and
will not result in the distribution of the Company Rights
(defined below) under the Second Amended and Restated
Stockholders Rights Agreement, dated as of April 8, 2011 as
amended (the Rights Plan), by and between the
Company and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC, as rights agent (the rights issued to
the holders of Common Stock pursuant to the Rights Plan are
referred to as the Company Rights) or the
ability of any Person to exercise any Company Rights under the
Rights Plan.
8.3 The Company has taken all action to vest any unvested
Seller Shares, and eliminate any restriction on transfer
applicable to any of the Seller Shares, effective as of
immediately prior to the Seller Closing.
B-6
9. Covenants
9.1 From the date hereof until the termination of this
Agreement in accordance with Section 13 hereof, the Sellers
will not, except as expressly required hereby, offer, sell,
contract to sell, announce the intention to sell, pledge, grant
any option to purchase, enter into any derivative transaction
(including, without limitation, any short sale or swap) with
respect to, grant any proxy with respect to, lend, or otherwise
transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, the Seller
Shares or any other shares of Common Stock that the Sellers may
at any time beneficially own directly or indirectly or any other
rights or interests arising out of or associated with the Seller
Shares or such other shares, or take any other action that would
breach any of their or the Companys covenants or
agreements hereunder or under the Merger Agreement or make any
of their respective representations or warranties to be untrue
or incorrect or in any way interfere with the performance of
their or the Companys obligations hereunder or under the
Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement.
9.2 Upon the terms and subject to the conditions hereof,
each of the parties hereto shall use its reasonable best efforts
to take, or cause to be taken, all appropriate action, and to
do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or
advisable under applicable laws and regulations to consummate
and make effective the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
9.3 The parties will consult with one another before
issuing any press release or otherwise making any public
statement with respect to this Agreement, and shall not issue
any such press release or make any such public statement absent
mutual agreement thereon, provided, however, that each
party hereto shall be entitled to make such press release,
announcement or filing as it deems, in its reasonable
discretion, to be necessary or appropriate under applicable law
or stock exchange requirement.
9.4 The Company hereby agrees to take all actions necessary
so that, upon consummation of the purchase and sale of the
Seller Shares contemplated hereby, the Purchaser shall be the
record owner of the Seller Shares and the Company shall list the
Purchaser as the owner of record of the Seller Shares on the
books and records of the Company.
9.5 The Sellers hereby agree that they will promptly notify
the Purchaser in writing of any new shares of Common Stock or
other shares of capital stock or securities of the Company
directly or indirectly acquired by the Sellers or any Affiliate
of any Seller, or of which the Sellers or any Affiliate of any
Seller become directly or indirectly the beneficial owner, if
any, after the date hereof.
9.6 This Agreement shall not be deemed to create any
contractual duty to disclose any material, nonpublic,
confidential information regarding Ocean Rig or the Company,
including Ocean Rigs or the Companys financial
condition, results of operations, businesses, properties,
assets, liabilities, management, projections, appraisals, plans
(including potential acquisitions and sales of assets and debt
and equity financing activities) and prospects (collectively,
the Information). Each of the parties hereto
acknowledges and agrees that (i) each other party hereto
and its subsidiaries and affiliates currently may have access to
and/or be in
the possession of, and later may come into possession of,
Information that is not known to the other parties hereto and
that may be material to a decision to acquire shares of Common
Stock or Ocean Rig Common Stock, (ii) each party hereto has
no duty (fiduciary or otherwise) to disclose to the other
parties hereto or their respective affiliates any of the
Information, (iii) the parties have determined to enter
into this Agreement and to purchase and sell the Seller Shares
and acquire and sell the shares of the Ocean Rig Common Stock on
the terms and conditions set forth herein notwithstanding their
lack of knowledge of the Information and notwithstanding that
such Information, if known to the other parties, might affect
their decision to, and the price at which such parties would be
willing to, purchase and sell the Seller Shares and acquire and
sell shares of the Ocean Rig Common Stock, (iv) each party
hereto has not requested, and will not request, from the other
parties hereto any of the Information that such other parties
may now have or of which such other party may later come into
possession, (v) each party hereto has not relied in any way
upon any act, statement or omission of any other party hereto or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliates with respect to the
Company, the Common Stock, Ocean Rig or the Ocean Rig Common
Stock, (vi) the parties hereto are experienced,
sophisticated and knowledgeable in trading in securities of
private and public companies and understand the disadvantage to
which they are subject on account of the possible disparity of
information between each such party, on the one hand, and each
other party, on the other and (vii) each party has
conducted its own investigation, to the extent that the Sellers
or the Purchaser, as applicable, has determined necessary or
desirable regarding the Company and Ocean
B-7
Rig, and each party has determined to enter into this Agreement
and complete the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based on, among other things, such investigation.
9.7 [Reserved.]
9.8 For a period of six months starting from the Seller
Closing Date, the Sellers will not offer, sell, contract to
sell, announce the intention to sell, pledge, grant any option
to purchase, enter into any derivative transaction (including,
without limitation, any short sale or swap) with respect to,
grant any proxy with respect to, lend, or otherwise transfer or
dispose of, directly or indirectly, the shares of Ocean Rig
Common Stock delivered to the Sellers pursuant to Section 2
hereof, or any other rights or interests arising out of or
associated with such shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock,
provided, however, that each Seller may, prior to
the Seller Closing, transfer its rights to receive shares of
Ocean Rig Common Stock hereunder, subject to the restrictions
set forth above and in Section 14 below. The restrictions
on transfer contained herein may be enforced by the Special
Committee.
9.9 The Purchaser agrees to cause Ocean Rig to provide
customary registration rights to the Sellers or their Designees
at the end of the
lock-up
period set forth in Section 9.8 so long as: (i) the
shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock transferred by Purchaser to the
Sellers or their Designees have at all times been and are held
by persons who are not affiliates of Ocean Rig or DryShips,
(ii) the Sellers and their Designees have complied with the
terms of this Agreement, including without limitation
Sections 9.8 and 14, and (iii) the
representations and warranties of the Sellers were true and
correct as of the Seller Closing Date; provided,
however, that if at the end of the
lock-up
period, all of the shares of Ocean Rig Common Stock held by a
Seller or its Designees may be sold within any 90 day
period under Rule 144 and the holder is not subject to the
manner of sale requirements of Rule 144, that holder shall
not have registration rights.
10. Acquisition Proposals; Non-Solicitation.
10.1 The Sellers shall, and shall cause their respective
Representatives to, immediately cease and cause to be terminated
any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any
person conducted prior to the date hereof with respect to any
Acquisition Proposal or any offer, proposal or indication of
interest by a Third Party to purchase or otherwise acquire any
of the Seller Shares. The Sellers shall not, and shall use
reasonable best efforts to cause their respective
Representatives not to, directly or indirectly,
(i) solicit, initiate or knowingly take any action to
facilitate or encourage the submission of any Acquisition
Proposal or any offer, proposal or indication of interest by a
Third Party to purchase or otherwise acquire any of the Seller
Shares, (ii) enter into or participate in any discussions
or negotiations with, furnish any information relating to the
Seller Shares or the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or
records of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to, any Third
Party with respect to inquiries regarding, or the making of, an
Acquisition Proposal or offer, proposal or indication of
interest to purchase or otherwise acquire any of the Seller
Shares, or (iii) approve, endorse, recommend or enter into
(or publicly propose to do any of the foregoing) any agreement
in principle, letter of intent, term sheet, merger agreement,
acquisition agreement, option agreement or other similar
instrument relating to an Acquisition Proposal or the sale,
transfer or other disposition of any the Seller Shares other
than pursuant to this Agreement.
10.2 The Sellers shall notify the Special Committee
promptly (but in no event later than 24 hours) after
receipt by any of them (or any of their respective
Representatives or Affiliates) of any Acquisition Proposal or
any offer, proposal or indication of interest by a Third Party
to purchase or otherwise acquire any of the Seller Shares,
including the material terms and conditions thereof and the
identity of the Person making such Acquisition Proposal or
offer, proposal or indication of interest to purchase or
otherwise acquire any of the Seller Shares and its proposed
financing sources, and shall keep the Special Committee
reasonably informed on a prompt basis (but in any event no later
than 24 hours) as to the status (including changes or
proposed changes to the material terms) of such Acquisition
Proposal or offer, proposal or indication of interest to
purchase or otherwise acquire any of the Seller Shares. The
Sellers shall also notify the Special Committee promptly (but in
no event later than 24 hours) after receipt by any of them
(or any of their respective Representatives or Affiliates) of
any request for non-public information relating to the Seller
Shares or the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or for access
to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries by any Third Party that has
informed the Sellers (or any of their respective Representatives
or Affiliates) that it is considering making, or has made, an
B-8
Acquisition Proposal or an offer, proposal or indication of
interest to purchase or otherwise acquire any of the Seller
Shares.
11. Waiver of Dissenting
Rights. Each of the Sellers hereby
irrevocably waives any and all rights it may have as to
appraisal, dissent or any similar or related matter with respect
to the Seller Shares (or other shares of Common Stock that it or
he may at any time beneficially own) that may arise with respect
to the Merger or any of the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement.
12. Closing Conditions
12.1 Conditions to Parties Obligations.
(a) The obligations of the parties to consummate the
purchase and sale of the Seller Shares contemplated hereby are
subject to the satisfaction of the following condition:
(i) No Applicable Law preventing or prohibiting the
consummation of the purchase or sale of any of the Seller Shares
hereunder shall be in effect.
(b) The obligation of the Purchaser to consummate the
purchase of the Seller Shares contemplated hereby is also
subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth in Section 10.3 of the
Merger Agreement shall have been satisfied (except that those
conditions that by their terms apply at the Effective Time shall
be measured as if they applied as of the Seller Closing Date);
(ii) The Sellers shall have complied in all material
respects with their obligations required to be performed by them
under this Agreement at or prior to the Seller Closing; and
(iii) The representations and warranties of the Sellers and
the Company in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all
material respects as of the date when made and as of the Seller
Closing Date, except for representations and warranties made as
of a specified date, which shall be measured only as of such
specified date.
(c) The obligation of the Sellers to consummate the sale of
the Seller Shares contemplated hereby is also subject to the
satisfaction of the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth in Section 10.2 of the
Merger Agreement shall have been satisfied (except that those
conditions that by their terms apply at the Effective Time shall
be measured as if they applied as of the Seller Closing Date);
(ii) The Purchaser shall have complied in all material
respects with the obligations required to be performed by it
under this Agreement at or prior to the Seller Closing; and
(iii) The representations and warranties of the Purchaser
in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material
respects as of the date when made and as of the Seller Closing
Date, except for representations and warranties made as of a
specified date, which shall be measured only as of such
specified date.
13. Termination.
13.1 This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to
the Seller Closing Date by mutual written consent of the
Purchaser and all the Sellers.
13.2 This Agreement shall automatically terminate as of the
earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement and the
Effective Time.
13.3 If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, no
party hereto shall have any liability or further obligation to
any other party to this Agreement; provided,
however, that (A) Sections 11 and 13 through 24
(inclusive) of this Agreement shall survive any termination
hereof in the event the Effective Time shall have occurred and
(B) no such termination shall relieve or release the
Company, the Sellers or the Purchaser from any obligations or
liabilities arising out of its breach of this Agreement prior to
its termination.
B-9
14. Successors and Assigns. This
Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective successors, permitted assigns, heirs
and personal representatives. None of the Sellers may assign its
obligations hereunder.
Subject to the conditions set forth below, each Seller shall
have the right, no later than seven Business Days prior to the
Seller Closing, to designate a maximum of three (3) Persons
to receive all or any portion of the Purchase Consideration
payable to such Seller hereunder (each such transferee, a
Designee). In arranging for such transfers of that
portion of the Purchase Consideration that is comprised of Ocean
Rig Common Stock, the Sellers shall engage in no directed
selling efforts (as that term is defined in
Regulation S of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) or general
solicitation (as that term is used in Regulation D of
the SEC), and shall make offers to transfer Purchase
Consideration, and actual transfers, only to Persons with whom
it has an existing relationship and who satisfy the criteria set
forth below. Additionally, all offering materials shall include
statements to the effect that the securities have not been
registered under the 1933 Act and may not be offered or
sold in the United States or to U.S. persons (as defined in
Regulation S of the SEC) unless the securities are
registered under the Act, or an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Act is available. In addition, each Person
invited to become a Designee shall satisfy the following
criteria: (a) such Person shall not be an affiliate (as
that term is defined in Rule 144 of the SEC) of Ocean Rig
or DryShips or any of their affiliates; (b) such Person
shall not be a U.S. person, shall not receive the offer to
become a Designee or any materials related thereto while in the
United States, and shall accept the offer from outside of
the United States; (c) such Person shall execute such
documentation as DryShips may require for purposes of
establishing to DryShips satisfaction that such Person has
appropriate wealth, sophistication and experience to invest in
the securities that comprise the Purchase Consideration,
understands the risks of the investment in such securities, is
able to bear the loss of its entire investment, is acquiring the
securities solely for purposes of investment, and otherwise is
able to receive the offer and sale of the securities under
applicable securities laws; (d) such Person understands and
agrees that the shares will be legended with a legend to be
determined by DryShips that will restrict the resales of such
securities, including resales in the United States or to
U.S. Persons; (e) such Person will be subject to all
of the commitments, obligations and restrictions of the Sellers
under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the
prohibition on resales for six months provided for in
Section 9.8 hereof and the provisions of Section 3(b);
and (f) such Person shall comply with such other
requirements as DryShips may reasonably require for purposes of
satisfying applicable U.S. federal and state and other
applicable securities laws. Each Designee shall execute and
deliver to the Purchaser, Ocean Freight and the Company such
agreements and documentation as they may require for purposes of
establishing the Designees agreement to, and compliance
with, all of the foregoing.
The Purchaser may at its option assign its rights under this
Agreement to any of its affiliates, but no such assignment shall
relieve the Purchaser of its obligations hereunder.
15. Entire Agreement. This
Agreement contains the entire agreement among the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior
and contemporaneous arrangements or understandings with respect
thereto.
16. Amendments. The terms and
provisions of this Agreement may only be modified or amended by
a written instrument executed and delivered by the Company
(through the Special Committee) the Purchaser and each Seller.
17. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in any number of counterparts, and each such
counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument,
but all such counterparts together shall constitute one
agreement.
18. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of New York without giving effect to the principles
of conflicts of law, except to the extent that the law of
Marshall Islands is mandatorily applicable to the Transfer
Documents.
19. Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury
Trial. EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY
CONSENTS AND AGREES THAT ANY LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING AGAINST
IT OR ANY OF ITS ASSETS WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE OBLIGATIONS
ARISING UNDER OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE BROUGHT BY
ANY PARTY IN ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN
B-10
MANHATTAN IN NEW YORK CITY OR IN THE FEDERAL SOUTHERN DISTRICT
IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND BY EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THIS
AGREEMENT, EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO AND
ACCEPTS WITH REGARD TO ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, FOR ITSELF
AND IN RESPECT OF ITS PROPERTY, THE JURISDICTION OF THE
AFORESAID COURTS AND IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PERMITTED BY LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE
MAINTENANCE OF ANY ACTION THEREIN. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT
THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT OR ANY OTHER PROCESS IN ANY ACTION MAY
BE SERVED BY NOTICE GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGREEMENT, OR
AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY LAW. EACH PARTY HERETO IRREVOCABLY
WAIVES THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.
20. Third Parties. This Agreement
is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and then
permitted assigns and no other party shall have any rights or
remedies with respect hereto.
21. Specific Performance. Each of
the parties hereto agrees that irreparable damage would occur in
the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties
hereto shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement in any court
specified in Section 19 hereof, without bond or other
security being required, this being in addition to any other
remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. Except as
otherwise provided herein, any and all rights and remedies
herein expressly conferred upon a party will be deemed
cumulative with and not exclusive of any other right or remedy
conferred hereby, or by law or equity upon such party, and the
exercise by a party of any one right or remedy will not preclude
the exercise of any other right or remedy.
22. Expenses; Fees. All costs,
fees and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement
shall be paid by or on behalf of the party incurring such cost
or expense, except for legal fees and other advisory fees up to
an aggregate of $1,500,000 incurred in connection with this
Agreement by the Sellers, which shall be paid by the Company
upon consummation of the Merger.
23. Severability. If any term or
other provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or incapable of
being enforced by any rule of applicable law or public policy,
all other terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement
shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect. Upon such
determination that any term or other provision is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall
negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect
the original intent of the parties as closely as possible to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law in an acceptable
manner to the end that the original intent of the parties are
fulfilled to the extent possible.
24. Notices. All notices and other
communications to any party hereunder shall be in writing and
shall be deemed duly given if delivered personally (notice
deemed given upon receipt), sent by telecopier or facsimile
(notice deemed given upon confirmation of receipt), sent by
nationally recognized overnight courier or by electronic mail
(notice deemed given upon receipt of proof of delivery) or sent
by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
postage prepaid (notice deemed given upon receipt of proof of
delivery), in each case, to the parties at the following
addresses or facsimile numbers (or at such other address or
facsimile number for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
If to the Purchaser, to:
DryShips Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion 15125
Athens Greece
Attention: Pankaj Khanna
Facsimile No.: + 30 210 80 90 577
B-11
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
One New York Plaza
New York, New York 10004
Attention: Philip Richter, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
(212) 859-4000
and
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
99 City Road
London, EC1Y 1AX, England
Attention: Robert Mollen, Esq.
Facsimile No.: +44.20.7972.9602
If to the Sellers to:
c/o Orrick,
Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP
51 W. 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
Attention: William Haft, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
(212) 506-5160
If to the Company to:
Special Committee
Attention: John Liveris
c/o Oceanfreight
Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Amaroussion 15125
Athens Greece
Facsimile No.: +30 210 61 40 284
cc:
Seward & Kissel LLP
One Battery Park Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attention: James Abbott, Esq. / Gary J. Wolfe, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
(212) 480-8421
or to such other address or facsimile number as such party may
hereafter specify for the purpose by notice to the other parties
hereto. All such notices, requests and other communications
shall be deemed received on the date of receipt by the recipient
thereof if received prior to 5:00 p.m. on a Business Day in
the place of receipt. Otherwise, any such notice, request or
communication shall be deemed to have been received on the next
succeeding business day in the place of receipt.
[Signature
Page Follows]
B-12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this
Purchase and Sale Agreement as of the date first above written.
DRYSHIPS INC.
Name: Pankaj Khanna
BASSET HOLDINGS INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Anthony
Kandylidis
|
Name: Anthony Kandylidis
STEEL WHEEL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Anthony
Kandylidis
|
Name: Anthony Kandylidis
HAYWOOD FINANCE LIMITED
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Anthony
Kandylidis
|
Name: Anthony Kandylidis
OCEANFREIGHT INC.
Name: Demetris Nenes
B-13
Annex C
July 25,
2011
Special Committee of the Board of Directors
OceanFreight Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue
Athens 15125
Greece
Members of the Special Committee:
We understand that OceanFreight Inc. (the Company),
DryShips Inc. (the Merger Partner), and Pelican
Stockholdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Merger
Partner (Merger Sub), propose to enter into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement),
pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the
Company (the Merger) in a transaction in which each
outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
the Company (the Company Common Stock), except
shares of the Company Common Stock held by the Merger Partner or
Merger Sub, will be converted into the right to receive from the
Merger Partner $11.25 in cash (the Cash
Consideration) and 0.52326 of a share (the Share
Consideration) of Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (Settlement
Sub), with the Cash Consideration and the Share
Consideration jointly referred to as the Exchange
Consideration. The terms and conditions of the Merger are
more fully set forth in the Merger Agreement. Concurrently with
the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company, the Merger
Partner and Basset Holdings, Inc. (Basset), Steel
Wheel Investments Limited (Steel Wheel) Haywood
Finance Limited (Haywood, together with Basset and
Steel Wheel, the Sellers), will enter into a
Purchase and Sale Agreement, whereby, inter alia,
the Merger Partner will purchase for the Exchange Consideration,
an aggregate of 3,000,856 shares of the Company Common
Stock, held by the Sellers.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Exchange
Consideration pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of the Company Common
Stock.
In arriving at our opinion, we have, among other things:
(i) reviewed the Merger Agreement;
(ii) reviewed certain publicly available financial and
other information about the Company;
(iii) reviewed certain information furnished to us by the
management of the Company, including financial forecasts and
analyses, relating to the business, operations and prospects of
the Company;
(iv) held discussions with members of senior management of
the Company concerning the matters described in
clauses (ii) and (iii) above;
(v) reviewed the share trading price history and valuation
multiples for the Company Common Stock and the Settlement Sub
Common Stock and compared them with those of certain publicly
traded companies that we deemed relevant;
(vi) compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger
with the financial terms of certain other transactions that we
deemed relevant;
(vii) reviewed appraisals dated July 25, 2011 and
June 30, 2011 respectively prepared by
[ * ](
and
[ * ]
with regard to the vessels owned by the Company (the
Appraisals);
(viii) conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In our review and analysis and in rendering this opinion, we
have assumed and relied upon, but have not assumed any
responsibility to independently investigate or verify, the
accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information
that was supplied or otherwise made available by the Company and
the Merger Partner or that was publicly available (including,
without limitation, the Appraisals and the other information
described above), or
(* name omitted.
C-1
that was otherwise reviewed by us. We have relied on assurances
of the managements of the Company and the Merger Partner that
they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make
such information inaccurate or misleading. In our review, we did
not obtain any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the
assets or liabilities of, nor did we conduct a physical
inspection of any of the properties or facilities of, the
Company or the Merger Partner, nor have we been furnished with
any such evaluations or appraisals, other than the Appraisals,
nor do we assume any responsibility to obtain any such
evaluations or appraisals.
With respect to the financial forecasts provided to and examined
by us, we note that projecting future results of any company is
inherently subject to uncertainty. The Company has informed us,
however, and we have assumed, that such financial forecasts were
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and good faith judgments of the management
of the Company as to the future financial performance of the
Company. We express no opinion as to the financial forecasts
provided to us by the Company or the assumptions on which they
are made.
Our opinion is based on economic, monetary, regulatory, market
and other conditions existing and which can be evaluated as of
the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any undertaking or
obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or
matter affecting our opinion of which we become aware after the
date hereof.
We have made no independent investigation of any legal or
accounting matters affecting the Company or the Merger Partner,
and we have assumed the correctness in all respects material to
our analysis of all legal and accounting advice given to the
Company, the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company (the Special Committee) and the Board of
Directors of the Company, including, without limitation, advice
as to the legal, accounting and tax consequences of the terms
of, and transactions contemplated by, the Merger Agreement to
the Company and its stockholders. In addition, in preparing this
opinion, we have not taken into account any tax consequences of
the transaction to any holder of Company Common Stock. We have
also assumed that in the course of obtaining the necessary
regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for
the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will
be imposed that would have an adverse effect on the Company, the
Merger Partner, the Settlement Sub or the contemplated benefits
of the Merger.
We were not authorized to and did not solicit any expressions of
interest from any other parties with respect to the sale of all
or any part of the Company or any other alternative transaction.
It is understood that our opinion is for the use and benefit of
the Special Committee in its consideration of the Merger, and
our opinion does not address the relative merits of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement as compared to
any alternative transaction or opportunity that might be
available to the Company, nor does it address the underlying
business decision by the Company to engage in the Merger or the
terms of the Merger Agreement or the documents referred to
therein. Our opinion does not constitute a recommendation as to
how any holder of shares of Company Common Stock should vote on
the Merger or any matter related thereto. In addition, you have
not asked us to address, and this opinion does not address, the
fairness to, or any other consideration of, the holders of any
class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the
Company, other than the holders of shares of Company Common
Stock. We express no opinion as to the price at which shares of
Company Common Stock or the Settlement Sub Common Stock will
trade at any time. Furthermore, we do not express any view or
opinion as to the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the
amount or nature of any compensation payable or to be received
by any of the Companys officers, directors or employees,
or any class of such persons, in connection with the Merger,
whether relative to the Exchange Ratio or otherwise.
We have been engaged by the Special Committee to act as its
financial advisor in connection with the Merger and will receive
a fee for our services. We also will be reimbursed for expenses
incurred. The Company has agreed to indemnify us against
liabilities arising out of or in connection with the services
rendered and to be rendered by us under such engagement. In the
ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may trade
or hold securities of the Company, the Merger Partner, the
Settlement Sub
and/or their
respective affiliates for our own account and for the accounts
of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold long or
short positions in those securities. In addition, we may seek
to, in the future, provide financial advisory and financing
services to the Company, the Merger Partner, the Settlement Sub
or entities that are affiliated with the Company, the Merger
Partner or the Settlement Sub, for which we would expect to
receive compensation. We have in the past provided services to
the Settlement Sub, including as a lead manager in its
$500 million private placement of equity in December 2010
and
C-2
as a lead manager in its $500 million private placement of
unsecured bonds in April 2011. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in our engagement letter with the Special Committee and
the Company, our opinion may not be used or referred to by the
Company, or quoted or disclosed to any person in any manner,
without our prior written consent.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Consideration pursuant
to the Merger Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view,
to the holders of the Company Common Stock.
Very truly yours,
for Fearnley Fonds ASA
Petter Skar, head of corporate finance
Annex D
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 20-F
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
OR
|
o
|
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Date of event requiring this
shell company report: Not applicable
Commission file number:
001-33416
OCEANFREIGHT INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
(Translation of
Registrants name into English)
Republic of the Marshall
Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
80 Kifissias Avenue, Athens
15125, Greece
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Mr. Antonis
Kandylidis
OceanFreight Inc.
80 Kifissias Avenue, Athens
15125, Greece
Phone: +30-210-6140283, Fax:
+30-210-6140284
E-mail:
management@oceanfreightinc.com
(Name, Telephone,
E-mail
and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact
Person)
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
Nasdaq Global Market
Nasdaq Global Market
|
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a
reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report:
As of December 31, 2010, the registrant had 83,266,655
common shares, $0.01 par value per share outstanding.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. o Yes þ No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934. o Yes þ No
Note-Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under
those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
U.S. GAAP þ International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards
o
Other
o
If Other has been checked in response to the
previous question, indicate by check mark which financial
statement item the registrant has elected to
follow. o Item 17 o Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). o Yes þ No
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Matters discussed in this annual report may constitute
forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor protections for
forward-looking statements in order to encourage companies to
provide prospective information about their business.
Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans,
objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and
underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other
than statements of historical facts.
OceanFreight Inc., or the Company, desires to take
advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this
cautionary statement in connection with the safe harbor
legislation. This document and any other written or oral
statements made by the Company or on its behalf may include
forward-looking statements, which reflect its current views with
respect to future events and financial performance. The words
believe, anticipate, intend,
estimate, forecast, project,
plan, potential, may,
should, expect and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements.
Please note in this annual report, we,
us, our, and the Company,
all refer to OceanFreight Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The forward-looking statements in this document are based upon
various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon
further assumptions, including, without limitation,
managements examination of historical operating trends,
data contained in our records and other data available from
third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were
reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently
subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are
difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control,
we cannot ensure that we will achieve or accomplish these
expectations, beliefs or projections.
In addition to these important factors and matters discussed
elsewhere in this report, and in our filings with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission), important factors that, in our view,
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength
of world economies and currencies, general market conditions,
including changes in charterhire rates and vessel values,
changes in demand in the drybulk carrier and tanker markets,
changes in the Companys operating expenses, including
bunker prices, drydocking and insurance costs, changes in
governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by
regulatory authorities including those that may limit the
commercial useful lives of drybulk carriers and tankers,
potential liability from pending or future litigation, general
domestic and international political conditions, potential
disruption of shipping routes due to accidents and political
events, or acts of terrorists and other important factors
described from time to time in the reports we file with the
Commission and the Nasdaq Global Market. We caution readers of
this report not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of their dates. We undertake no
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
These forward looking statements are not guarantees of our
future performance, and actual results and future developments
may vary materially from those projected in the forward looking
statements.
D-1
PART I
Not Applicable
Item 2. Offer
Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not Applicable
Item 3. Key
Information
|
|
A.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data
|
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
financial and other data as of December 31, 2006, 2007,
2008, 2009 and 2010 and for the period from September 11,
2006 (date of inception) through December 31, 2006 and for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010. We
refer you to the notes to our consolidated financial statements
for a discussion of the basis on which our consolidated
financial statements are presented. The information provided
below should be read in conjunction with Item 5
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and the
consolidated financial statements, related notes and other
financial information included herein.
Following the 3:1 reverse stock split effected on June 17,
2010, pursuant to which every three shares of our common stock
issued and outstanding were converted into one share of common
stock, all share and per share amounts in this annual report
have been retroactively restated to reflect this change in
capital structure. Please refer to Item 3.D. Industry
Specific Risk Factors and Item 4.A History and
Development of the Company.
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data and average daily results)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 11,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenue and imputed deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
41,133
|
|
|
|
157,434
|
|
|
|
132,935
|
|
|
|
102,190
|
|
Gain/(loss) on forward freight agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
(14,275
|
)
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,208
|
)
|
|
|
(28,980
|
)
|
|
|
(43,915
|
)
|
|
|
(41,078
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(3,460
|
)
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
(8,540
|
)
|
|
|
(8,264
|
)
|
Survey and drydocking costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,685
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
(5,570
|
)
|
|
|
(1,784
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,210
|
)
|
|
|
(43,658
|
)
|
|
|
(48,272
|
)
|
|
|
(24,853
|
)
|
Loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,176
|
)
|
|
|
(62,929
|
)
|
Operating income/(loss )
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
11,612
|
|
|
|
60,658
|
|
|
|
(164,217
|
)
|
|
|
(46,256
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,671
|
)
|
|
|
(16,528
|
)
|
|
|
(12,169
|
)
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,184
|
)
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
(8,713
|
)
|
Net Income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Earnings/(losses) per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
(6.82
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Earnings/(losses) per subordinated share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,784,423
|
|
|
|
4,773,824
|
|
|
|
26,185,442
|
|
|
|
70,488,531
|
|
Weighted average number of subordinated shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,042,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 11,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
23,069
|
|
|
|
37,272
|
|
|
|
9,549
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
20,711
|
|
|
|
28,677
|
|
|
|
100,299
|
|
|
|
109,754
|
|
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280
|
|
|
|
587,189
|
|
|
|
423,242
|
|
|
|
311,144
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
507,925
|
|
|
|
625,570
|
|
|
|
549,272
|
|
|
|
478,863
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
33,884
|
|
|
|
116,381
|
|
|
|
73,328
|
|
|
|
111,311
|
|
Long-term imputed deferred revenue including current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,349
|
|
|
|
16,031
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sellers credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt including current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,600
|
|
|
|
308,000
|
|
|
|
265,674
|
|
|
|
209,772
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
213,410
|
|
|
|
246,961
|
|
|
|
256,611
|
|
|
|
235,236
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24,434
|
|
|
|
81,369
|
|
|
|
26,552
|
|
|
|
28,449
|
|
Net cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(467,216
|
)
|
|
|
(120,665
|
)
|
|
|
(130,786
|
)
|
|
|
(42,678
|
)
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
461,327
|
|
|
|
42,381
|
|
|
|
118,437
|
|
|
|
(13,494
|
)
|
Cash dividends per common and subordinated share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
7.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for common and subordinated stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,048
|
|
|
|
47,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,841
|
|
|
|
96,699
|
|
|
|
55,502
|
|
|
|
41,032
|
|
Fleet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of vessels(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Number of vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Average age of fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Total calendar days for fleet(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
Total voyage days for fleet(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
4,466
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
Fleet utilization(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
99.1
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
Average Daily Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter equivalent (TCE) rate(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,558
|
|
|
|
34,705
|
|
|
|
28,523
|
|
|
|
23,022
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
6,960
|
|
|
|
9,444
|
|
|
|
9,397
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation, loss on sale of vessels and impairment charges on
vessels. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from
operations, as determined by U.S. GAAP Our calculation of
Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other
companies. Adjusted EBITDA is included in this annual report
because it is a basis upon which we assess our liquidity
position, because it is used by our lenders as a measure of our
compliance with certain loan covenants and because we believe
that it presents useful information to investors regarding our
ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. The following
table |
D-3
|
|
|
|
|
reconciles net cash from operating activities, as reflected in
the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 consolidated statements of cash
flows, to Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
24,434
|
|
|
|
81,369
|
|
|
|
26,552
|
|
|
|
28,449
|
|
Net increase in operating assets
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
4,881
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
Net increase in operating liabilities
|
|
|
(7,556
|
)
|
|
|
(5,865
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
Net interest expense(*)
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
16,789
|
|
|
|
19,563
|
|
|
|
14,816
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,159
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
20,841
|
|
|
|
96,699
|
|
|
|
55,502
|
|
|
|
41,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Net interest expense includes the realized loss of interest rate
swaps included in Loss on derivative instrument in
the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Average number of vessels is the number of vessels that
constituted the fleet for the relevant period, as measured by
the sum of the number of days each vessel was a part of the
fleet during the period divided by the number of calendar days
in the related period. |
|
(3) |
|
Calendar days are the total days the vessels were in the
Companys possession for the relevant period including
off-hire and drydock days. |
|
(4) |
|
Total voyage days for the fleet are the total days during which
the vessels were in the Companys possession for the
relevant period, net of off-hire days. |
|
(5) |
|
Fleet utilization is the percentage of time that the vessels
were available for revenue generating voyage days, and is
determined by dividing voyage days by fleet calendar days for
the relevant period. |
|
(6) |
|
Time charter equivalent, or TCE, is a measure of the average
daily revenue performance of a vessel on a per voyage basis. The
Companys method of calculating TCE is consistent with
industry standards and is determined by dividing voyage
revenues (net of voyage expenses) by voyage days for the
relevant time period. Voyage expenses primarily consist of port,
canal and fuel costs that are unique to a particular voyage,
which would otherwise be paid by the charterer under a time
charter contract, as well as commissions. TCE is a standard
shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare
period-to-period
changes in a shipping companys performance despite changes
in the mix of charter types (i.e., spot charters, time charters
and bareboat charters) under which the vessels may be employed
between the periods. |
|
(7) |
|
Daily vessel operating expenses, which include vessel management
fees, crew costs, provisions, deck and engine stores,
lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs, are
calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by fleet
calendar days for the relevant time period. |
|
|
B.
|
Capitalization
and Indebtedness
|
Not applicable.
|
|
C.
|
Reasons
for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not applicable.
Some of the following risks relate principally to the sectors of
the seaborne transportation industry in which we operate and our
business in general. Other risks relate principally to the
securities market and ownership of our common stock. The
occurrence of any of the events described in this section could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, operating results and cash flows and the trading
price of our securities could decline.
D-4
Industry
Specific Risk Factors
Charterhire
rates for drybulk carriers and tanker vessels have been very
volatile, which may adversely affect our earnings
The drybulk and tanker shipping industries are cyclical with
attendant volatility in charterhire rates and profitability. The
degree of charterhire rate volatility among different types of
drybulk and tanker carriers has varied widely. For example after
reaching historical highs in mid-2008, charterhire rates for
Panamax and Capesize drybulk carriers reached near historically
low levels in 2009 and thereafter recovered considerably in
2010. We currently employ our drybulk carriers on long term time
charters. We cannot ensure that we will be able to successfully
charter our vessels in the future or renew existing charters at
rates sufficient to allow us to meet our obligations in the
future. Because the factors affecting the supply and demand for
vessels are outside of our control and are unpredictable, the
nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry
conditions are also unpredictable.
Factors that influence demand for vessel capacity include:
|
|
|
|
|
supply and demand for refined petroleum products and crude oil
for tankers and drybulk commodities for drybulk carriers;
|
|
|
|
changes in crude oil production and refining capacity for
tankers and drybulk commodity production for drybulk carriers
and resulting shifts in trade flows for crude oil, petroleum
products and drybulk commodities;
|
|
|
|
the location of regional and global exploration, production and
manufacturing facilities;
|
|
|
|
the location of consuming regions for energy resources and
commodities;
|
|
|
|
the globalization of production and manufacturing;
|
|
|
|
competition from alternative sources of energy;
|
|
|
|
global and regional economic and political conditions, including
armed conflicts, terrorist activities; and piracy;
nationalizations, sanctions, embargoes and strikes;
|
|
|
|
developments in international trade and fluctuations in
industrial and agricultural production;
|
|
|
|
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including
the distance cargo is transported by sea;
|
|
|
|
environmental and other legal and regulatory developments;
|
|
|
|
currency exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
weather and acts of God and natural disasters, including
hurricanes and typhoons.
|
The factors that influence the supply of vessel capacity include:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of newbuilding deliveries;
|
|
|
|
current and expected purchase orders for vessels;
|
|
|
|
port and canal congestion;
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit
the useful lives of vessels;
|
|
|
|
the scrapping rate of older vessels;
|
|
|
|
vessel freight rates;
|
|
|
|
the price of steel and vessel equipment;
|
|
|
|
vessel casualties; and
|
|
|
|
the number of vessels that are out of service or converted to
other use.
|
D-5
We anticipate that the future demand for our vessels will be
dependent upon continued economic growth in the worlds
economies, including China and India, seasonal and regional
changes in demand, changes in the capacity of the global drybulk
carrier and tanker fleets and the sources and supply of drybulk
cargo and oil and oil products to be transported by sea. The
capacity of the global drybulk carrier and tanker fleet seems
likely to increase and there can be no assurance that economic
growth will continue. Adverse economic, political, social or
other developments could have a material adverse effect on our
business and operating results.
The
downturns in the drybulk carrier and tanker charter markets and
related declines in vessel values may have an adverse effect on
our earnings, affect compliance with our loan covenants, require
us to raise additional capital in order to comply with our loan
covenants, and affect our ability to pay dividends if reinstated
in the future.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI), an average daily index of charter
rates in 26 shipping routes measured on a time charter and
voyage basis covering Supramax, Panamax and Capesize drybulk
carriers, recovered significantly in 2010 as compared to the low
of the fourth quarter of 2008. The 2010 average of the BDI was
2,761, which is about 8.1% lower than the 2009 average of 3,005
and 287% higher than the December 2008 average of 743. However,
this is still below the BDIs high of 10,844 reached in May
2008. As of April 7, 2011, the BDI stands at 1,401.
A decline in the drybulk market will result in lower charter
rates for vessels exposed to the spot market and time charters
linked to the BDI. Our drybulk carriers are presently employed
under time charters that are not directly linked to the BDI.
Drybulk vessel values have also rebounded in part since
2008s steep decline. Charter rates and vessel values were
severely affected in 2008, in part by the lack of availability
of credit to finance both vessel purchases and purchases of
commodities carried by sea, resulting in a decline in cargo
shipments, and the excess supply of iron ore in China that
resulted in falling iron ore prices and increased stockpiles in
Chinese ports. The increase in drybulk vessel values in 2009
resulted primarily from cheaper prices for raw materials from
producing countries like Brazil and Australia compared to raw
materials produced domestically in Asia; consequently China has
increased its imports of raw materials. In 2008, Chinas
iron ore imports comprised about 65% of the total volume of iron
transported by sea. In 2009, this number increased to about 80%
and in 2010 this number dropped slightly due to the global
recovery of the steel industry. There can be no assurance as to
how long charter rates and vessel values will remain at their
current levels or whether they will experience significant
volatility.
The decline in vessel values in the drybulk carrier and tanker
markets resulted in an impairment loss of $52.7 million
that we recorded in 2009 due to the impairment of the M/T
Pink Sands and the M/T Tamara. In addition, the
decline resulted in a loss from sale of vessels and vessels held
for sale we recorded in 2009 of $133.2 million, and a loss
from sale of vessels and vessels held for sale in 2010 of
$62.9 million. The losses in 2010 were recorded as a result
of the sale of the M/V Pierre, M/T Tigani and M/T
Pink Sands and the classification of the M/T
Tamara, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton and M/V
Augusta as vessels held for sale. The losses in 2009 were
recorded as a result of the sale of the M/V Lansing, M/V
Richmond and M/V Juneau and the classification of
the M/V Pierre, M/T Olinda and M/T Tigani
as vessels held for sale.
The tanker industry has an inherent volatility caused by
seasonal demand fluctuations. During the fall, refineries
typically build stockpiles to cover demand for heating
distillates during the winter. Early in the spring the
refineries move into a maintenance period in order to switch
production to gasoline instead of heavy distillates. This
results in the reduction of required seaborne transportation of
oil. As a general pattern, demand for petroleum products during
the summer is less than the demand for such products during the
winter. This seasonality is reflected in the time charter
equivalent rate for a Suezmax tanker route loading in West
Africa and discharging in the U.S. Atlantic Coast, where
the average rate was $18,796 per day during August, 2010
compared to $32,503 per day during September 2010.
In response to a significant decline in oil prices during 2008,
OPEC significantly reduced oil supply, causing WTI oil prices to
recover from a low of $34 per barrel in December 2008 to an
average WTI oil price of approximately $62 per barrel in 2009
and approximately $80 per barrel in 2010. During the last OPEC
meeting, the ministers agreed to leave existing output targets
unchanged in order to help economic recovery by avoiding further
increases of oil prices during the economic recession. The
decline in oil supply had an adverse effect on the demand
D-6
for tankers and tanker charter rates. Consistent with this
trend, the value of the tankers in our fleet has declined,
resulting in the impairment loss recorded in 2009 of
$116.6 million.
On December 12, 2008, our Board of Directors determined,
after careful consideration of various factors, including the
recent decline in charter rates and vessel values in the drybulk
sector, to suspend the payment of cash dividends until such time
as the Board of Directors shall determine in its discretion, in
order to preserve capital.
On January 9, 2009, we entered into an amendment to our
Nordea credit facility that waived the December 9, 2008
breach of the collateral maintenance coverage ratio contained in
such credit facility resulting from the decrease in the market
value of our vessels and reducing the level of the collateral
maintenance coverage ratio for the remaining term of the
agreement. Please see Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects B. Liquidity and Capital
Resources Long Term Debt Obligations and Credit
Arrangements and Note 7 to our financial statements.
On November 24, 2009, DVB consented to a reduction of the
collateral maintenance coverage ratio to 125% for the period
from November 24, 2009 to December 17, 2010 and the
deposit of $2.5 million in the retention account that was
blocked during the above period was classified in restricted
cash in current assets in the 2009 consolidated balance sheet.
As of December 31, 2010 we were in compliance with the
collateral maintenance ratio contained in our DVB credit
facility.
If the current low charter rates in the drybulk market continue
through any significant period during which time charters for
our vessels expire and we consequently become exposed to
then-prevailing charter rates, our earnings may be adversely
affected. If these trends continue, in order to remain viable,
we may have to extend the period in which we suspend dividend
payments or reinstate dividend payments at a reduced level
(subject to restrictions in our credit facility, including a
prohibition on dividend payments set forth in our amended Nordea
credit facility, which matures in October 2015), sell vessels in
our fleet
and/or seek
to raise additional capital in the equity markets. If we are
able to sell additional shares at a time when the charter rates
in the drybulk and tanker charter markets are low, such sales
could be at prices below those at which shareholders had
purchased their shares, which could, in turn, result in
significant dilution of our then existing shareholders and
affect our ability to pay dividends if reinstated in the future
and our earnings per share. During the period from
February 6, 2009 to the termination of the Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement on March 28, 2010, we issued a total
of 53.3 million common shares pursuant to our Standby
Equity Purchase Agreement (SEPA) and Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement (SEDA), with YA Global Master
SPV Ltd., or YA Global, resulting in net proceeds of
$208.1 million. Even if we are able to raise additional
capital in the equity markets, there is no assurance we will be
able to comply with our loan covenants.
An
over-supply of drybulk carrier and/or tanker capacity may lead
to reductions in charterhire rates and
profitability.
The market supply of drybulk carriers has been increasing, and
the number of drybulk carriers on order is near historic highs.
These newbuildings were delivered in significant numbers
starting at the beginning of 2006 and continuing through 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, newbuilding orders had been placed
for an aggregate of approximately 51.9% of the existing global
drybulk fleet in terms of deadweight tonnage, or dwt, with
deliveries expected during the next 36 months. The market
supply of tankers is affected by a number of factors such as
demand for energy resources, oil, and petroleum products, as
well as strong overall economic growth in part of the world
economy, including Asia. As of December 31, 2010
newbuilding orders have been placed for an aggregate of
approximately 27.6% of the existing global tanker fleet in terms
of dwt, with deliveries expected during the next 36 months.
An over-supply of drybulk carrier
and/or
tanker capacity may result in a reduction of charterhire rates.
If such a reduction occurs, upon the expiration or termination
of our vessels current charters we may only be able to
re-charter our vessels at reduced or unprofitable rates or we
may not be able to charter these vessels at all.
Declines
in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause us
to incur impairment charges.
We evaluate the carrying amounts of our vessels in order to
determine if events have occurred that would require an
impairment of their carrying amounts. The recoverable amount of
vessels is reviewed based on events and changes in circumstances
that would indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might
not be recovered. The
D-7
review for potential impairment indicators and projection of
future cash flows related to the vessels is complex and requires
us to make various estimates including future freight rates,
earnings from the vessels and discount rates. All of these items
have been historically volatile.
We evaluate an assets recoverable amount as the sum of its
future undiscounted cash flows generated through the
assets remaining useful life . If the recoverable amount
is less than net book value of the vessel, the vessel is deemed
to be impaired. The carrying values of our vessels may not
represent their fair market value at any point in time because
the new market prices of secondhand vessels tend to fluctuate
with changes in charter rates and the cost of newbuildings. In
the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, charter rates in
the drybulk and tanker markets declined significantly and vessel
values also declined. As a result, we recorded an impairment
loss of $52.7 million that we recorded in 2009 due to the
impairment of the M/T Pink Sands and the M/T
Tamara. In addition, the decline resulted in a loss from
sale of vessels or vessels held for sale we recorded in 2009 of
$133.2 million, and a loss from sale of vessels or vessels
held for sale in 2010 of $62.9 million, respectively. The
losses in 2010 were recorded as a result of the sale of the M/V
Pierre, M/T Tigani and M/T Pink Sands and
the classification of the M/T Tamara, M/V Austin,
M/V Trenton and M/V Augusta as vessels held for
sale. The losses in 2009 were recorded as a result of the sale
of the M/V Lansing, M/V Richmond and M/V Juneau
and the classification of the M/V Pierre, M/T
Olinda and M/T Tigani as vessels held for sale in
2009. Any additional impairment charges incurred as a result of
further declines in charter rates could negatively affect our
business, financial condition, operating results or the trading
price of our common shares.
Because
the market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, we
may incur losses when we sell vessels or we may be required to
write down their carrying value, which would adversely affect
our earnings.
The fair market value of our vessels may increase or decrease
depending on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions affecting the
international tanker and drybulk shipping industries;
|
|
|
|
prevailing level of charter rates;
|
|
|
|
competition from other shipping companies;
|
|
|
|
types, sizes and ages of vessels;
|
|
|
|
other modes of transportation;
|
|
|
|
cost of newbuildings;
|
|
|
|
price of steel;
|
|
|
|
governmental or other regulations; and
|
|
|
|
technological advances.
|
If we sell vessels at a time when vessel prices have fallen the
sale may be at less than the vessels carrying amount in
our financial statements in which case we will realize a loss.
Vessel prices can fluctuate significantly, and in the case where
the market value falls below the carrying amount we evaluate the
asset for a potential impairment and may be required to write
down the carrying amount of the vessel on our financial
statements and incur a loss and a reduction in earnings, if the
estimate of undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges,
expected to be generated by the use of the asset is less than
its carrying amount.
Changes
in the economic and political environment in China and policies
adopted by the government to regulate its economy may have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most countries
that belong to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, or OECD, in such respects as structure, government
involvement, level of development, growth rate, capital
reinvestment, allocation of resources, rate of inflation and
balance of payments position. Prior to 1978, the Chinese economy
was a planned economy. Since 1978, increasing emphasis has been
D-8
placed on the utilization of market forces in the development of
the Chinese economy. Annual and five year State Plans are
adopted by the Chinese government in connection with the
development of the economy. Although state-owned enterprises
still account for a substantial portion of the Chinese
industrial output, in general, the Chinese government is
reducing the level of direct control that it exercises over the
economy through State Plans and other measures. There is an
increasing level of freedom and autonomy in areas such as
allocation of resources, production, pricing and management and
a gradual shift in emphasis to a market economy and
enterprise reform. Limited price reforms were undertaken, with
the result that prices for certain commodities are principally
determined by market forces. Many of the reforms are
unprecedented or experimental and may be subject to revision,
change or abolition based upon the outcome of such experiments.
If the Chinese government does not continue to pursue a policy
of economic reform, the level of imports to and exports from
China could be adversely affected by changes to these economic
reforms by the Chinese government, as well as by changes in
political, economic and social conditions or other relevant
policies of the Chinese government, such as changes in laws,
regulations or export and import restrictions, all of which
could adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Disruptions
in world financial markets and the resulting governmental action
in the United States and in other parts of the world, could have
a material adverse impact on our ability to obtain financing,
our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows,
and could cause the market price of our common shares to
decline.
Although the world economy is currently recovering from the
second-worst downturn in the last 100 years, the future of
this recovery still remains fragile. The effects of the downturn
are still lingering as credit remains tight, demand for goods
and services has not yet fully recovered and unemployment is
high. The credit markets worldwide and in the United States have
experienced significant contraction, de-leveraging and reduced
liquidity, and the United States federal government, state
governments and foreign governments have implemented a broad
variety of governmental action
and/or new
regulation of the financial markets.
Securities and futures markets and the credit markets are
subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and other
requirements. The Commission, other regulators, self-regulatory
organizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary
actions in the event of market emergencies, and may effect
changes in law or interpretations of existing laws.
A number of financial institutions have experienced serious
financial difficulties and, in some cases, have entered
bankruptcy proceedings or are in regulatory enforcement actions.
The uncertainty surrounding the recovery of the credit markets
in the United States and the rest of the world has resulted in
reduced access to credit worldwide that is especially evident in
our industry. Over the last few years, certain banking
institutions have been forced to record heavy losses from
troubled shipping loans. As of the date of this Annual Report,
we had total outstanding indebtedness of $153.6 million
under our existing credit facility.
We face risks attendant to changes in economic environments,
changes in interest rates, and instability in certain securities
markets, among other factors. Major market disruptions and
adverse changes in market conditions and the regulatory climate
worldwide may adversely affect our business or impair our
ability to borrow amounts under our credit facility or any
future financial arrangements. The current market conditions may
last longer than we anticipate. These recent and developing
economic and governmental factors may have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash
flows, have caused the price of our common shares to decline and
could cause the price of our common shares to decline further.
The
recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan may have an adverse
affect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and ability to pay dividends.
Japan is one of the worlds leading importers of dry bulk
commodities. The severe earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan
on March 11, 2011 have caused an estimated
$180 billion of damage and has threatened to send the
Japanese economy into a recession. As of the date of this annual
report, the extent to which the earthquake and tsunami and the
pollution from the emitted radiation from the damaged nuclear
reactors will affect the international economies and shipping
industry is unclear. A prolonged recovery period with a
relatively stagnant Japanese
D-9
economy could decrease dry bulk imports to that country. This,
in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business
and results of operations.
Acts
of piracy on ocean-going vessels have recently increased in
frequency, which could adversely affect our
business.
Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels
trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea and
in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia extending
throughout the Indian Ocean. Throughout 2008, 2009 and 2010, the
frequency of piracy incidents against commercial shipping
vessels increased significantly, particularly in the Gulf of
Aden off the coast of Somalia. Drybulk vessels and tankers are
particularly vulnerable to such attacks. For example, on
January 15, 2010, the M/V Samho Jewelry, a tanker
vessel not affiliated with us, was seized by pirates while
transporting chemicals 800 miles off the Somali coast. If
these piracy attacks result in regions in which our vessels are
deployed being characterized as war risk zones by
insurers, as the Gulf of Aden has been since May 2008, or Joint
War Committee (JWC) war and strikes listed areas,
premiums payable for such insurance coverage could increase
significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult
to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including costs related to
the employment of onboard security guards, could increase in
such circumstances. We may not be adequately insured to cover
losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse
effect on us. In addition, any detention hijacking as a result
of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost,
or unavailability, of insurance for our vessels, could have a
material adverse impact on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and ability to reinstate the payment of
dividends.
Fuel,
or bunker prices, may adversely affect profits.
While we generally do not bear the cost of fuel, or bunkers,
under our time charters, fuel is a significant factor in
negotiating charter rates. As a result, an increase in the price
of fuel beyond our expectations may adversely affect our
profitability at the time of charter negotiation or when our
vessels trade in the spot market. Fuel is also a significant, if
not the largest, expense in our shipping operations when vessels
are under voyage charter. Increases in the price of fuel may
adversely affect our profitability. The price and supply of fuel
is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our
control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand
for oil and gas, actions by OPEC and other oil and gas
producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and
regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns.
We are
subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental
regulations that can adversely affect the cost, manner or
feasibility of doing business.
Our operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations in
the form of international conventions and treaties, national,
state and local laws and national and international regulations
in force in the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or
are registered, which can significantly affect the ownership and
operation of our vessels. These requirements include, but are
not limited to, the International Convention on Civil Liability
for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, the International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1975, the
International Maritime Organization, or IMO, the International
Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution of 1973, the
IMO International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of
1974, the International Convention on Load Lines of 1966, the
U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, the U.S. Clean
Air Act, the U.S. Clean Water Act and the U.S. Marine
Transportation Security Act of 2002. Compliance with such laws,
regulations and standards, where applicable, may require
installation of costly equipment or operational changes and may
affect the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. We may
also incur additional costs in order to comply with other
existing and future regulatory obligations, including, but not
limited to, costs relating to air emissions, the management of
ballast waters, maintenance and inspection, development and
implementation of emergency procedures and insurance coverage or
other financial assurance of our ability to address pollution
incidents. These costs could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition. A failure to comply with applicable laws and
regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties,
criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our
operations. Environmental laws often impose strict liability for
remediation of spills and releases of oil and hazardous
substances, which could subject us to liability without regard
to whether we were negligent or at fault. Under OPA, for
example, owners, operators and bareboat charterers are jointly
and severally
D-10
strictly liable for the discharge of oil within the
200-mile
exclusive economic zone around the United States. An oil spill
could result in significant liability, including fines,
penalties and criminal liability and remediation costs for
natural resource damages under other federal, state and local
laws, as well as third-party damages. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico may also result in additional
regulatory initiatives or statutes or changes to existing laws
that may affect our operations or require us to incur additional
expenses to comply with such regulatory initiatives, statutes or
laws. We are required to satisfy insurance and financial
responsibility requirements for potential oil (including marine
fuel) spills and other pollution incidents. Although we have
arranged insurance to cover certain environmental risks, there
can be no assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to
cover all such risks or that any claims will not have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition.
We are
subject to international safety regulations and the failure to
comply with these regulations may subject us to increased
liability, may adversely affect our insurance coverage and may
result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain
ports.
The operation of our vessels is affected by the requirements set
forth in the IMOs International Management Code for the
Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code.
The ISM Code requires shipowners, ship managers and bareboat
charterers to develop and maintain an extensive Safety
Management System that includes the adoption of a safety
and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions
and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for
dealing with emergencies. The failure of a shipowner or bareboat
charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject it to
increased liability, may invalidate existing insurance or
decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels
and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in,
certain ports. As of the date of this Annual Report, each of our
vessels is ISM code-certified.
Compliance
with safety and other vessel requirements imposed by
classification societies may be very costly and may adversely
affect our business.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be
classed by a classification society authorized by its country of
registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is
safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and
regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the
Safety of Life at Sea Convention.
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and
special surveys. In lieu of a special survey, a vessels
machinery may be placed on a continuous survey cycle, under
which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a
five-year period.
Our vessels are on special survey cycles for hull inspection and
continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every vessel
is also required to be dry docked every two to three years for
inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel.
If a vessel does not maintain its class
and/or fails
any annual survey, intermediate survey or special survey, the
vessel will be unable to trade between ports and will be
unemployable, which will negatively impact our revenues and
results from operations.
Our
vessels may suffer damage due to the inherent operational risks
of the seaborne transportation industry and we may experience
unexpected drydocking costs, which may adversely affect our
business and financial condition.
Our vessels and their cargoes will be at risk of being damaged
or lost because of events such as marine disasters, bad weather,
business interruptions caused by mechanical failures, grounding,
fire, explosions and collisions, human error, war, terrorism,
piracy and other circumstances or events. These hazards may
result in death or injury to persons, loss of revenues or
property, environmental damage, higher insurance rates, damage
to our customer relationships, delay or rerouting. If our
vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a
drydocking facility. The costs of drydock repairs are
unpredictable and may be substantial. We may have to pay
drydocking costs that our insurance does not cover in full. The
loss of earnings while these vessels are being repaired and
repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, would
decrease our earnings. In addition, space at drydocking
facilities is sometimes limited and not all drydocking
facilities are conveniently located. We may be
D-11
unable to find space at a suitable drydocking facility or our
vessels may be forced to travel to a drydocking facility that is
not conveniently located to our vessels positions. The
loss of earnings while these vessels are forced to wait for
space or to steam to more distant drydocking facilities would
decrease our earnings.
Maritime
claimants could arrest our vessels, which would interrupt our
business.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel,
shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a
maritime lien against that vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims
or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may
enforce its lien by arresting a vessel through foreclosure
proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our
vessels could interrupt our business or require us to pay large
sums of funds to have the arrest lifted, which would have a
negative effect on our cash flows.
In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under
the sister ship theory of liability, a claimant may
arrest both the vessel which is subject to the claimants
maritime lien and any associated vessel, which is
any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants
could try to assert sister ship liability against
one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another one of
our ships.
Governments
could requisition our vessels during a period of war or
emergency, resulting in loss of earnings.
A government could requisition for title or seize our vessels.
Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of
a vessel and becomes the owner. Also, a government could
requisition our vessels for hire. Requisition for hire occurs
when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively
becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally,
requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency.
Government requisition of one or more of our vessels may
negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of
operations and ability to pay dividends if reinstated in the
future.
We
operate our vessels worldwide and as a result, our vessels are
exposed to international risks which may reduce revenue and/or
increase expenses.
The international shipping industry is an inherently risky
business involving global operations. Our vessels are at a risk
of damage or loss because of events such as mechanical failure,
collision, human error, war, terrorism, piracy, cargo loss and
bad weather. In addition, changing economic, regulatory and
political conditions in some countries, including political and
military conflicts, have from time to time resulted in attacks
on vessels, mining of waterways, piracy, terrorism, labor
strikes and boycotts. These sorts of events could interfere with
shipping routes and result in market disruptions, which may
reduce our revenue
and/or
increase our expenses.
International shipping is subject to various security and
customs inspections and related procedures in countries of
origin and destination and at trans-shipment points. Inspection
procedures can result in the seizure of cargo
and/or our
vessels, delays in loading, offloading or delivery and the
levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against us.
It is possible that changes to inspection procedures could
impose additional financial and legal obligations on us.
Furthermore, changes to inspection procedures could also impose
additional costs and obligations on our customers and may, in
certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo
uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments
may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, cash flows, financial condition, available cash and
ability to pay dividends if reinstated in the future.
If our
vessels call on ports located in countries that are subject to
sanctions and embargoes imposed by the U.S. or other
governments, that could adversely affect our reputation and the
market for our common stock.
From time to time on charterers instructions, our vessels
may call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and
embargoes imposed by the United States government and countries
identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of
terrorism. The U.S. sanctions and embargo laws and
regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply
to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities,
and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be
amended or strengthened over time. In 2010, the
U.S. enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions
Accountability and Divestment Act (CISADA), which
expanded the scope of the former Iran Sanctions
D-12
Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the
prohibitions to
non-U.S. companies,
such as our company, and introduces limits on the ability of
companies and persons to do business or trade with Iran when
such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of
refined petroleum or petroleum products. Although we believe
that we are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and
embargo laws and regulations, and intend to maintain such
compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in
compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain
laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing
interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines or
other penalties and could result in some investors deciding, or
being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in
our company.
Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their
interest, or not to invest, in our company simply because we do
business with companies that do business in sanctioned
countries, even if we have not violated any laws. Moreover, our
charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and
regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our
vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect
our reputation. Investor perception of the value of our common
stock may also be adversely affected by the consequences of war,
the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions
in these and surrounding countries.
Political
instability, terrorist attacks and international hostilities can
affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could
adversely affect our business.
We conduct most of our operations outside of the United States,
and our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial
condition and ability to pay dividends if reinstated in the
future may be adversely affected by changing economic, political
and government conditions in the countries and regions where our
vessels are employed or registered. Moreover, we operate in a
sector of the economy that is likely to be adversely impacted by
the effects of political instability, terrorist or other
attacks, war or international hostilities. Terrorist attacks
such as the attacks on the United States on September 11,
2001, the bombings in Spain on March 11, 2004, in London on
July 7, 2005 and in Mumbai on November 26, 2008 and
the continuing response of the world community to these attacks,
as well as the threat of future terrorist attacks, continue to
contribute to world economic instability and uncertainty in
global financial markets. Future terrorist attacks could result
in increased volatility of the financial markets in the United
States and globally and could result in an economic recession in
the United States or worldwide. These uncertainties could also
adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing on
terms acceptable to us or at all.
Company
Specific Risk Factors
We may
not be able to comply with the collateral maintenance coverage
ratio covenants in our credit facility, which may affect our
ability to conduct our business if we are unable to obtain
waivers or covenant modifications from our
lenders.
Our credit facility with Nordea Bank Norge ASA, or Nordea,
requires us to maintain a minimum ratio of the fair market value
of our vessels mortgaged thereunder to our aggregate outstanding
balance under the credit facility (please see Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources Long-Term Debt
Obligations and Credit Arrangements). The market value of
drybulk and tanker vessels is sensitive to, among other things,
changes in the drybulk and tanker charter markets, respectively,
with vessel values deteriorating in times when drybulk and
tanker charter rates, as applicable, are falling and improving
when charter rates are anticipated to rise. The current decline
in charter rates in the drybulk market coupled with the
prevailing difficulty in obtaining financing for vessel
purchases have adversely affected drybulk vessel values. The
recent fall in oil prices has also led to lower tanker charter
rates and tanker vessel values. These conditions have led to a
significant decline in the fair market values of our vessels
since December 31, 2008, particularly with respect to our
drybulk carriers.
On January 9, 2009, we entered into an amendatory agreement
to our Nordea credit facility, or the Nordea Amendatory
Agreement, which became effective on January 23, 2009. The
Nordea Amendatory Agreement waives the breach of the collateral
maintenance coverage ratio covenant contained in such credit
facility resulting from the decrease in the market value of our
vessels and reduces the level of the collateral maintenance
coverage ratio to a level between 90% and 125% for the remaining
term of the agreement, with such waiver taking effect from the
date
D-13
of prior breach to the effective date of the Nordea Amendatory
Agreement. Although we are currently in compliance with the
collateral maintenance coverage ratio covenants under our credit
facility, in the future we may fall out of compliance if our
vessel values experience further declines. If this were to
occur, under the terms of our credit facility, our lenders could
require us to post additional collateral or pay down our
indebtedness to a level at which we are in compliance with our
loan covenants and, if we are unable to post this collateral,
make these prepayments or obtain a waiver, our lenders could
accelerate our indebtedness, which would impair our ability to
continue to conduct our business. In such an event, our auditors
may give either an unqualified opinion with an explanatory
paragraph relating to the disclosure in the notes to our
financial statements as to the substantial doubt of our ability
to continue as a going concern, or a qualified, adverse or
disclaimer of opinion, which could lead to additional defaults
under our loan agreement.
If the current low charter rates in the drybulk market and the
tanker market and low vessel values continue or decrease
further, our ability to comply with various other covenants in
our loan agreement may be adversely affected. In such event, we
may have to seek additional covenant modifications or waivers.
Any default by or the failure of our charterers to honor their
obligations to us under our charter agreements would reduce the
likelihood that our lenders would be willing to provide waivers
or covenant modifications or other accommodations. If our
indebtedness is accelerated in full or in part, it would be very
difficult in the current financing environment for us to
refinance our debt or obtain additional financing and we could
lose our vessels if our lenders foreclose their liens.
Furthermore, as a result of the decline in our vessel values, we
recorded an impairment loss of $52.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (please see Impairment on
Vessels in this Annual Report and Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets in Note 2(l) to the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010
included herein) and if the current low charter rates in the
drybulk market and the tanker market continue or decrease
further, we may have to record further impairment adjustments to
our financial statements which would adversely affect our
financial results and further hinder our ability to raise
capital. Also, because we sold certain of our vessels at prices
lower than their book values, we incurred a loss of
$133.2 million and $62.9 million in 2009 and 2010,
respectively. If we find it necessary to sell additional vessels
under the same circumstances, we will recognize losses and a
reduction in our earnings which could affect our ability to
raise additional capital that may be necessary to comply with
our loan covenants.
We
depend upon a few significant customers for a large part of our
revenues and the loss of one or more of these customers could
adversely affect our financial performance.
We derive a significant part of our revenue from a small number
of customers, with 55.0% of our revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2010 generated from two charterers. Our fleet
is currently employed under fixed rate period charter
arrangements to three charterers. If one or more of these
customers is unable to perform under one or more charters with
us and we are not able to find a replacement charter, or if a
customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter, we
could suffer a loss of revenues that could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We could lose a customer or the benefits of a time charter if,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the customer fails to make charter payments because of its
financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver
the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or
damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the
vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or if we are otherwise
in default under the charter; or
|
|
|
|
the customer terminates the charter because the vessel has been
subject to seizure for more than a specified number of days.
|
If we lose a key customer, we may be unable to obtain charters
on comparable terms or may become subject to the volatile spot
market, which is highly competitive and subject to significant
price fluctuations. The time charters on which we currently
deploy six of the vessels in our fleet provide for charter rates
that are significantly above current market rates, particularly
spot market rates that most directly reflect the current
depressed levels of the drybulk and tanker charter markets. If
it were necessary to secure substitute employment, in the spot
market or on
D-14
time charters, for any of these vessels due to the loss of a
customer in these market conditions, such employment would be at
a significantly lower charter rate than the charter rate
currently generated by such vessel, or we may be unable to
secure a charter at all, in either case, resulting in a
significant reduction in revenues. The loss of any of our
customers, time charters or vessels, or a decline in payments
under our charters, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to pay dividends, if reinstated, in the future. For
example, in January 2010, we terminated the time charter
agreement for the M/V Pierre as a result of the
charterers insolvency and failure to perform, and
rechartered the vessel with a new charterer at the same gross
daily hire rate of $23,000.
If we
do not adequately manage the construction of our newbuilding
vessels, the vessels may not be delivered on time or in
compliance with their specifications.
We have agreed to acquire five newbuilding vessels through
wholly owned subsidiaries. We are obliged to supervise the
construction of these vessels. If we are denied supervisory
access to the construction of these vessels by the relevant
shipyard or otherwise fail to adequately manage the shipbuilding
process, the delivery of the vessels may be delayed or the
vessels may not comply with their specifications, which could
compromise their performance. Both delays in delivery and
failure to meet specifications could result in lower revenues
from the operations of the vessels, which could reduce our
earnings.
We do
not have financing arranged to fully cover the remaining yard
obligations due for the construction of our five newbuilding
VLOCs.
We own contracts for the construction of five newbuilding VLOCs
scheduled to be delivered in the first, second, and third
quarters of 2012, and the second and fourth quarters of 2013,
respectively. As of March 31, 2011, $68.8 million was
paid in yard installments for these hulls, which was partially
financed by SEDA proceeds and an equity issuance in April 2011
of 35,657,142 of our common shares. The remaining yard
obligations amount to $254.3 million as of the date of this
report, of which $40.9 million, $148.1 million and
$65.3 million are payable in 2011, 2012 and 2013,
respectively. We expect the remaining yard obligations to be
financed by (1) a new facility with a major Chinese bank
for which we have entered into a commitment letter but not yet
entered into definitive documentation, which we expect will
finance 60% of the cost of three of the VLOCs, (2) other
forms of external financing; (3) equity offerings and
(4) cash from operations. However, we have not yet obtained
such financing. In the current challenging financing
environment, it may be difficult to obtain secured debt to
finance these purchases or raise debt or equity in the capital
markets. If we fail to secure financing for the remaining
payments due on these five newbuilding VLOCs, we could also lose
our deposit money, which as of March 31, 2011 amounted to
$68.8 million, and we may incur additional liability and
costs.
The
failure of our counterparties to meet their obligations under
our time charter agreements could cause us to suffer losses or
otherwise adversely affect our business.
Six of our vessels are currently employed under time charters
with two customers, with 55.0% of our revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2010 generated from two customers
chartering our drybulk carriers. The ability and willingness of
each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a
time charter agreement with us will depend on a number of
factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other
things, general economic conditions, the condition of the
drybulk shipping and tanker industries and the overall financial
condition of the counterparty. In addition, in depressed market
conditions, there have been reports of charterers renegotiating
their charters or defaulting on their obligations under charters
and our customers may fail to pay charterhire or attempt to
renegotiate charter rates. For example, we agreed to reduce the
contracted charter rate for one of our drybulk vessels, the M/V
Augusta, from $42,100 per day to $16,000 per day upon its
commencement in November 2008.
The time charters on which we are currently deploying six of the
vessels in our fleet provide for charter rates that are above
current market rates. If our charterers fail to meet their
obligations to us or attempt to renegotiate our charter
agreements, we could sustain significant losses which could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows, as well as our ability to
pay dividends, if reinstated, in the future, and comply with
covenants in our credit facility. For example, in January 2010,
we terminated the time
D-15
charter agreement for the M/V Pierre as a result of the
charterers insolvency and failure to perform, and
rechartered the vessel with a new charterer at the same gross
daily hire rate of $23,000.
The
market price of our common shares has fluctuated widely and the
market price of our common shares may fluctuate in the future.
We are currently not in compliance with the minimum bid price
rule of the Nasdaq Global Market and therefore we may need to
take further action in order to maintain our
listing.
The market price of our common shares has fluctuated widely
since our initial public offering in April 2007 and may continue
to do so as a result of many factors, including our actual
results of operations and perceived prospects, the prospects of
our competition and of the shipping industry in general and in
particular the drybulk and tanker sectors, differences between
our actual financial and operating results and those expected by
investors and analysts, changes in analysts
recommendations or projections, changes in general valuations
for companies in the shipping industry, particularly the drybulk
and tanker sectors, changes in general economic or market
conditions and broad market fluctuations.
Since January 12, 2009, the market price of our common
shares has dropped below $5.00 per share, and the last reported
closing price on The Nasdaq Global Market on April 13, 2011
was $0.59 per share. If the market price of our common shares
remains below $5.00 per share, under stock exchange rules, our
shareholders will not be able to use such shares as collateral
for borrowing in margin accounts. This inability to continue to
use our common shares as collateral may lead to sales of such
shares, thereby creating downward pressure on and increased
volatility in the market price of our common shares.
In addition, under the rules of the Nasdaq Global Market, listed
companies are required to maintain a share price of at least
$1.00 per share and if the closing share price stays below $1.00
for a period of 30 consecutive business days, then the listed
company would have a cure period of at least 180 days for
the purpose of regaining compliance with the $1.00 per share
minimum. On March 1, 2010 we received notice from the
Nasdaq Global Market that we were not in compliance with the
minimum bid price rule, and we carried out a
1-for-3
reverse stock split on June 17, 2010 in order to regain
compliance with Nasdaq rules. Our stock price has again declined
below $1.00 per share for a period of 30 consecutive business
days, and on January 25, 2011, we received notice from The
Nasdaq Stock Market that we were not in compliance with the
minimum bid price rule and as a result, we are required to take
action during the relevant cure period ending in July 2011, such
as another reverse stock split, in order to comply with Nasdaq
rules. We are considering various options that will enable us to
regain compliance within the cure period.
Our
earnings may be adversely affected if we do not successfully
employ our vessels.
Our strategy is to employ our vessels on fixed rate period
charters, three of which are scheduled to expire in 2012 under
the earliest re-delivery dates. Current charter rates have
sharply declined from historically high levels and the charter
market remains volatile. In the past, the charter rates for
vessels have declined below the operating costs of vessels. If
our vessels become available for employment in the spot market
or under new period charters during periods when charter rates
are at depressed levels, we may have to employ our vessels at
depressed charter rates which would lead to reduced or volatile
earnings. We cannot ensure that future charter rates will be at
a level that will enable us to operate our vessels profitably or
to reinstate dividend payments or repay our debt.
The
aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in
the future, which could adversely affect our
earnings.
In general, the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating
condition increase with the age of the vessel. As of the date of
this Annual Report, our fleet has a weighted average age of
7.7 years. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient
and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed
vessels due to newer vessels improvements in engine
technology. Cargo insurance rates increase with the age of a
vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers.
Governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards
related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for
alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and
may restrict the type of activities in
D-16
which our vessels may engage. We cannot ensure that, as our
vessels age, market conditions will justify those expenditures
or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the
remainder of their useful lives.
Purchasing
and operating previously owned, or secondhand, vessels may
result in increased drydocking costs and vessels off-hire, which
could adversely affect our earnings.
Even following a physical inspection of secondhand vessels prior
to purchase, we do not have the same knowledge about their
condition and cost of any required (or anticipated) repairs that
we would have had if these vessels had been built for and
operated exclusively by us. Accordingly, we may not discover
defects or other problems with such vessels prior to purchase.
Defects or problems discovered after purchase may be expensive
to repair, and if not detected, may result in accidents or other
incidents for which we may become liable to third parties.
Generally, we do not receive the benefit of warranties on
secondhand vessels. Increased drydocking costs or vessels
off-hire may adversely affect our earnings.
Unless
we set aside reserves or are able to borrow funds for vessel
replacement, at the end of a vessels useful life our
revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Unless we maintain reserves or are able to borrow or raise funds
for vessel replacement we will be unable to replace the vessels
in our fleet upon the expiration of their remaining useful
lives, which we expect to range from 25 years to
30 years, depending on the type of vessel. Our cash flows
and income are dependent on the revenues earned by the
chartering of our vessels to customers. If we are unable to
replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their
useful lives, our business, results of operations, financial
condition and ability to pay dividends, if reinstated, will be
materially and adversely affected. Any reserves set aside for
vessel replacement may not be available for dividends if
reinstated in the future.
Investors
may experience significant dilution as a result of future
offerings and issuances of shares.
On July 24, 2009, we entered into the SEDA, which is
described under Note 8(c) to our consolidated financial
statements. The SEDA commenced on September 28, 2009 and
was terminated on March 18, 2010. Under the SEDA we issued
and sold an aggregate of 29,401,836 (88,208,508 before the
reverse stock split) common shares with net proceeds of
$98.2 million.
On January 12, 2010, we filed a shelf registration
statement on
Form F-3,
which was declared effective on January 21, 2010, pursuant
to which we may sell up to $400 million of an
undeterminable number of securities. No shares had been issued
under this shelf registration statement as of the date of this
Annual Report.
On January 14, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted and
approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, under which 10,000,000
(30,000,000 before the reverse stock split) common shares were
reserved for issuance. On January 18, 2010, our Board of
Directors approved the award of 1,000,000 (3,000,000 before the
reverse stock split) common shares to Steel Wheel Investments
Limited, a company controlled by the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and 66,667 (200,000 before the reverse stock
split) common shares to the Companys Directors and
officers. On December 17, 2010, our Board of Directors
approved the award of 6,000,000 common shares to Steel Wheel
Investments Limited, a company controlled by the Companys
Chief Executive Officer.
On May 25, 2010, our Board of Directors approved an equity
infusion of $20 million by Basset Holdings Inc., or Basset,
a company controlled by the Companys Chief Executive
Officer, in order to fund the Companys capital needs for
the purchase of M/V Montecristo. On May 28, 2010,
Basset paid the amount of $20 million in exchange for
approximately 16.7 million (50 million before the
reverse stock split) of the Companys common shares at a
price of $0.40 per share before the reverse stock split.
On June 10, 2010, our stockholders approved a 3:1 reverse
stock split, pursuant to which every three shares, of our common
stock issued and outstanding, were converted into one share of
common stock. The reverse stock split took effect as of the
start of trading on the Nasdaq Global Market on June 17,
2010 and reduced the number of the then issued and outstanding
common shares from 231,800,001 common shares to 77,266,655
common shares.
D-17
Accordingly, all share and per share amounts in this report have
been retroactively restated to reflect this change in capital
structure.
On April 1, 2011, we entered into two agreements to
purchase two Capesize vessels under construction of 206,000 DWT
each, through the acquisition of the shares of the relevant
owning companies for a company ultimately controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer in exchange for an
aggregate of 35,657,142 common shares of the Company. The
vessels are scheduled to be delivered in the second and fourth
quarter of 2013. The total outstanding yard payments amount to
$96.24 million, of which $29.7 million is payable in
2012 and the balance is payable in 2013.
As our loan agreement contains provisions providing that a
change-of-control
will be deemed to have occurred if a person or entity, that was
not a beneficial owner of our capital stock at the respective
times of our entry into such agreements, becomes the beneficial
owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 20% of the voting or
ownership interest in the Company, such issuances of common
shares could result in a change of control, thereby constituting
an event of default under this loan agreement that entitles our
lenders to declare all of our indebtedness thereunder
immediately due and payable. Similar provisions may arise in our
new loan agreement with a Chinese bank, to partially finance
three VLOCs whose shipbuilding contracts we have acquired, once
we enter into definitive documentation for such loan.
In addition, we may have to attempt to sell additional shares in
the future in order to satisfy our capital needs; however there
can be no assurance that we will be able to do so. Lenders may
be unwilling to provide future financing or will provide future
financing at significantly increased rates. If we are able to
sell shares in the future, the prices at which we sell these
future shares will vary, and these variations may be
significant. Our existing shareholders will experience
significant dilution if we sell these future shares at prices
significantly below the price at which previous shareholders
invested.
We
intend to expand our operations into other sectors and own and
operate a diversified fleet of vessels which will expose us to a
greater number of risks.
Our current fleet is comprised of six secondhand drybulk
carriers that mainly transport iron ore, coal, grains and
minerals, fertilizers and one secondhand tanker vessel that
transports crude oil. We intend to grow our fleet and expand our
operations into other sectors, as well. Operating a diversified
fleet of vessels as opposed to a fleet concentrated in one
sector of the seaborne transportation industry requires
expertise in multiple sectors and the ability to avoid a greater
variety of vessel management risks in order to maintain
effective operations.
Until June 15, 2010, Cardiff Marine Inc., or Cardiff,
provided technical and commercial vessel management services for
our fleet. Subsequent to June 15, 2010, the management of
our fleet was contracted to TMS Dry Ltd and TMS Tankers Ltd. We
refer to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd as our Fleet Managers.
We cannot ensure that we or our Fleet Managers will have the
requisite expertise to address the greater variety of vessel
management risks to which we expect to be exposed as we expand
into other sectors.
We are
entirely dependent on our Fleet Managers to perform the
day-to-day
management of our fleet.
Our executive management team consists of our Chief Executive
Officer, our President and Chief Operating Officer, our Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer and our Chief Accounting
Officer. As we subcontract the
day-to-day
vessel management of our fleet, including crewing, maintenance
and repair to our Fleet Managers, we are dependent on our Fleet
Managers and the loss of our Fleet Managers services or
failure to perform obligations to us could materially and
adversely affect the results of our operations. Although we may
have rights against our Fleet Managers if they default on their
obligations to us, you will have no recourse directly against
our Fleet Managers. Further, we expect that we will need to seek
approval from our lenders to change our Fleet Managers. If our
Fleet Managers suffer material damage to their reputation or
relationships, such material damage may harm our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
continue to operate our vessels and service our customers;
|
|
|
|
renew existing charters upon their expiration;
|
D-18
|
|
|
|
|
obtain new charters;
|
|
|
|
obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms;
|
|
|
|
obtain insurance on commercially acceptable terms;
|
|
|
|
maintain satisfactory relationships with our customers and
suppliers; and
|
|
|
|
successfully execute our growth strategy.
|
Our
Fleet Managers are privately held companies and there may be
limited or no publicly available information about
them.
Our Fleet Managers are privately held companies. The ability of
our Fleet Managers to continue providing services for our
benefit will depend in part on their own financial strength.
Circumstances beyond our control could impair our Fleet
Managers financial strength, and there may be limited
publicly available information about their financial strength.
As a result, an investor in our common shares might have little
advance warning of problems affecting our Fleet Managers, even
though these problems could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our
Fleet Managers may have conflicts of interest between us and
other clients of our Fleet Managers.
We have subcontracted the
day-to-day
technical and commercial management of our fleet, including
crewing, maintenance, supply provisioning and repair to our
Fleet Managers. Our contracts with our Fleet Managers have an
initial term of one year which will automatically extend for
successive one year terms, unless, in each case, at least two
months advance notice of termination is given by either
party. Our Fleet Managers will be providing similar services for
vessels owned by other shipping companies including companies
with which they are affiliated. These responsibilities and
relationships could create conflicts of interest between our
Fleet Managers performance of their obligations to us, on
the one hand, and our Fleet Managers performance of their
obligations to their other clients on the other hand. These
conflicts may arise in connection with the crewing, supply
provisioning and operations of the vessels in our fleet versus
vessels owned by other clients of our Fleet Managers. In
particular, our Fleet Managers may give preferential treatment
to vessels owned by other clients whose arrangements provide for
greater economic benefit to our Fleet Managers. These conflicts
of interest may have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Companies
affiliated with our Fleet Managers own, and will acquire vessels
that compete with our fleet.
Our Fleet Managers provide commercial and technical management
for the vessels in our fleet. Both companies are beneficially
owned (a) 30% by a company the beneficial owner of which is
Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis, the mother of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and (b) 70% by a
foundation controlled by Mr. George Economou. Mrs. C.
Kandylidis is also the sister of Mr. G. Economou and the
wife of one of the Companys directors,
Mr. Konstandinos Kandylidis. Our Fleet Managers currently
manage 31 tankers and 27 drybulk carriers and supervise the
construction of 16 crude oil tankers, and four drybulk carriers
with scheduled delivery dates in 2011 and 2012 on behalf of
companies controlled by members of the Economou family and the
construction of four ultra deep water drilling rigs. Moreover,
Mr. Economou, members of his family and companies
affiliated with our Fleet Managers, own and will acquire
additional vessels in the future. These vessels could be in
competition with our fleet. Our Fleet Managers may be faced with
conflicts of interest with respect to their interests and their
obligations to us.
In the
highly competitive international shipping industry, we may not
be able to compete for charters with new entrants or established
companies with greater resources.
We employ our vessels in a highly competitive market that is
capital intensive and highly fragmented. Competition arises
primarily from other vessel owners, some of whom have
substantially greater resources than we do. Competition for the
transportation of drybulk cargo by sea is intense and depends on
price, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of
the vessel and its operators to the charterers. Due in part to
the highly fragmented market, competitors with greater resources
could enter the drybulk shipping industry and operate larger
fleets
D-19
through consolidations or acquisitions and may be able to offer
lower charter rates and higher quality vessels than we are able
to offer.
We may
be unable to effectively manage our growth.
We intend to continue to grow our fleet. Our growth will depend
on:
|
|
|
|
|
locating and acquiring suitable vessels;
|
|
|
|
identifying and consummating acquisitions or joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate excess cash flow so that we can invest
without jeopardizing our ability to cover current and
foreseeable working capital needs (including debt service);
|
|
|
|
obtaining required financing;
|
|
|
|
integrating any acquired business successfully with our existing
operations;
|
|
|
|
enlarging our customer base;
|
|
|
|
hiring additional shore-based employees and seafarers; and
|
|
|
|
managing our expansion.
|
We intend to finance our growth with the net proceeds of future
debt and equity offerings. Growing any business by acquisition
presents numerous risks such as undisclosed liabilities and
obligations, difficulty in obtaining additional qualified
personnel and managing relationships with customers and
suppliers and integrating newly acquired operations into
existing infrastructures. The expansion of our fleet may impose
significant additional responsibilities on our management and
staff, and the management and staff of our Fleet Manager, and
may necessitate that we, and they, increase the number of
personnel. We cannot give any assurance that we will be
successful in executing our growth plans or that we will not
incur significant expenses and losses in connection therewith.
If our
Fleet Managers are unable to recruit suitable seafarers for our
fleet or as we expand our fleet, our results of operations may
be adversely affected.
We rely on our Fleet Managers to recruit suitable senior
officers and crews for our fleet. In addition, as we expand our
fleet, we will have to rely on our Fleet Managers to recruit
suitable additional seafarers. We cannot ensure that our Fleet
Managers will be able to continue to hire suitable employees as
we expand our fleet. If our Fleet Managers crewing agents
encounter business or financial difficulties, they may not be
able to adequately staff our vessels. The seafarers who are
employed on the ships in our fleet are covered by industry-wide
collective bargaining agreements that set basic standards. We
cannot ensure that these agreements will prevent labor
interruptions. If our Fleet Managers are unable to recruit
suitable seafarers as we expand our fleet, our business, results
of operations, cash flows, financial condition and our ability
to pay dividends if reinstated in the future may be materially
adversely affected.
Labor
interruptions could disrupt our business.
Our vessels are manned by masters, officers and crews that are
employed by our shipowning subsidiaries. If not resolved in a
timely and cost-effective manner, industrial action or other
labor unrest could prevent or hinder our operations from being
carried out normally and could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial
condition and ability to pay dividends if reinstated in the
future.
We may
be unable to attract and retain key senior management personnel
and other employees in the seaborne transportation industry,
which may negatively affect the effectiveness of our management
and our results of operations.
Our success depends upon our ability to hire and retain key
members of our senior management team. The loss of any of these
individuals could adversely affect our business prospects and
financial condition. Difficulty in hiring
D-20
and retaining personnel could adversely affect our business,
results of operations and ability to pay dividends if reinstated
in the future. We do not intend to maintain key man
life insurance on any of our officers.
The
operation of drybulk carriers and tankers each involve certain
unique operational risks.
The operation of drybulk carriers has certain unique operational
risks. With a drybulk carrier, the cargo itself and its
interaction with the ship can be a risk factor. By their nature,
drybulk cargoes are often heavy, dense, easily shifted, and
react badly to water exposure. In addition, drybulk carriers are
often subjected to battering treatment during unloading
operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out
of the hold), and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause
damage to the drybulk carrier. Drybulk carriers damaged due to
treatment during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to
a breach to the sea. Hull breaches in drybulk carriers may lead
to the flooding of their holds. If a drybulk carrier suffers
flooding in its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so
dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the drybulk
carriers bulkheads leading to the loss of the drybulk
carrier.
The operation of tankers has unique operational risks associated
with the transportation of oil. An oil spill may cause
significant environmental damage, and a catastrophic spill could
exceed the insurance coverage available. Compared to other types
of vessels, tankers are exposed to a higher risk of damage and
loss by fire, whether ignited by a terrorist attack, collision,
or other cause, due to the high flammability and high volume of
the oil transported in tankers.
If we are unable to adequately maintain or safeguard our vessels
we may be unable to prevent these events. Any of these
circumstances or events could negatively impact our business,
financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay
dividends if reinstated in the future. In addition, the loss of
any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and
reliable vessel owner and operator.
Our
insurance may not be adequate to cover our losses that may
result from our operations due to the inherent operational risks
of the seaborne transportation industry.
We carry insurance to protect us against most of the
accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our business,
including marine hull and machinery insurance, protection and
indemnity insurance, which includes pollution risks, crew
insurance and war risk insurance. However, we may not be
adequately insured to cover losses from our operational risks,
which could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally,
our insurers may refuse to pay particular claims and our
insurance may be voidable by the insurers if we take, or fail to
take, certain action, such as failing to maintain certification
of our vessels with applicable maritime regulatory
organizations. Any significant uninsured or under-insured loss
or liability could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition
and our ability to pay dividends if reinstated in the future. In
addition, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance
coverage at reasonable rates in the future during adverse
insurance market conditions.
As a result of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the
U.S. response to the attacks and related concern regarding
terrorism, insurers have increased premiums and reduced or
restricted coverage for losses caused by terrorist acts
generally. Accordingly, premiums payable for terrorist coverage
have increased substantially and the level of terrorist coverage
has been significantly reduced.
In addition, we may not carry
loss-of-hire
insurance, which covers the loss of revenue during extended
vessel off-hire periods, such as those that occur during an
unscheduled drydocking due to damage to the vessel from
accidents. Accordingly, any loss of a vessel or extended vessel
off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition and our ability to pay dividends if
reinstated in the future.
We may
be subject to calls because we obtain some of our insurance
through protection and indemnity associations.
We may be subject to increased premium payments, or calls, in
amounts based on our claim records and the claim records of our
Fleet Managers as well as the claim records of other members of
the protection and indemnity
D-21
associations through which we receive insurance coverage for
tort liability, including pollution-related liability. In
addition, our protection and indemnity associations may not have
enough resources to cover claims made against them. Our payment
of these calls could result in significant expense to us, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay
dividends if reinstated in the future.
Servicing
our debt limits funds available for other purposes and if we
cannot service our debt, we may lose our vessels.
Borrowing under our credit facility requires us to dedicate a
part of our cash flow from operations to paying interest on our
indebtedness. These payments limit funds available for working
capital and capital expenditures. We expect our earnings and
cash flow to vary from year to year due to the cyclical nature
of the drybulk carrier and tanker industries. If we do not
generate or reserve enough cash flow from operations to satisfy
our debt obligations, we may have to undertake alternative
financing plans, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
seeking to raise additional capital;
|
|
|
|
refinancing or restructuring our debt;
|
|
|
|
selling vessels; or
|
|
|
|
reducing or delaying capital investments.
|
However, these alternative financing plans, if necessary, may
not be sufficient to allow us to meet our debt obligations. If
we are unable to meet our debt obligations or if some other
default occurs under our credit facility, our lenders could
elect to declare that debt, together with accrued interest and
fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed against the
collateral vessels securing that debt, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We
cannot ensure that we will be able to borrow amounts under our
senior secured credit facility and restrictive covenants in our
senior secured credit facility may impose financial and other
restrictions on us.
Our senior credit facility, as amended, imposes operating and
financial restrictions on us. These restrictions may limit our
ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness, including through the issuance of
guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create or permit liens on our assets;
|
|
|
|
sell our vessels or the capital stock of our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
make investments;
|
|
|
|
change the flag or classification society of our vessels;
|
|
|
|
reinstate the payment of dividends (as described under
Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects-B, Liquidity and Capital Resources);
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
compete effectively to the extent our competitors are subject to
less onerous financial restrictions; and
|
|
|
|
change the management of our vessels or terminate or materially
amend the management agreement relating to each vessel.
|
These restrictions could limit our ability to finance our
operations or capital needs, make acquisitions or pursue
available business opportunities. In addition, as discussed
above, our credit facility requires us to maintain specified
financial ratios and satisfy financial covenants. We expect to
be able to comply with all of these specified financial ratios
and financial covenants. However, should our charter rates or
vessel values further decline in the future due to any of the
reasons discussed in the industry specific risk factors set
forth above or otherwise, we may be required to
D-22
take action to reduce our debt or to act in a manner contrary to
our business objectives to meet these ratios and satisfy these
covenants. Events beyond our control, including changes in the
economic and business conditions in the shipping markets in
which we operate, may affect our ability to comply with these
covenants. We cannot ensure that we will meet these ratios or
satisfy these covenants or that our lenders will waive any
failure to do so. A breach of any of the covenants in, or our
inability to maintain the required financial ratios under, our
senior secured credit facility would prevent us from borrowing
additional money under our credit facility agreements and could
result in a default under this agreement. If a default occurs
under our credit facility agreement, the lenders could elect to
declare the outstanding debt, together with accrued interest and
other fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed
against the collateral securing that debt, which could
constitute all or substantially all of our assets.
Therefore, our discretion is limited because we may need to
obtain consent from our lenders in order to engage in certain
corporate actions. Our lenders interests may be different
from ours, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to
obtain our lenders consent when needed. This may prevent
us from taking actions that are in our best interest.
Our ability to obtain additional debt financing may be dependent
on the performance of our then existing charters and the
creditworthiness of our charterers.
The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, and
any defaults by them, may materially affect our ability to
obtain the additional capital resources required to purchase
additional vessels or may significantly increase our costs of
obtaining such capital. Our inability to obtain additional
financing, whether at anticipated costs or at all may materially
affect our results of operation and our ability to implement our
business strategy.
We have entered into a commitment letter with a major Chinese
bank, and the above considerations are expected to apply to our
loan agreement with this lender upon our entry into definitive
documentation.
We
cannot ensure that we will be able to refinance any indebtedness
incurred under our credit facility.
We have partially financed the acquisition of our vessels with
secured indebtedness drawn under our credit facility. We cannot
ensure that we will be able to refinance amounts drawn under our
credit facility at an interest rate or on terms that are
acceptable to us or at all. If we are not able to refinance
these amounts with the net proceeds of debt and equity offerings
at an interest rate or on terms acceptable to us or at all, we
will have to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations
to pay the principal and interest of this indebtedness. If we
are not able to satisfy these obligations, we may have to
undertake alternative financing plans.
The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, any
defaults by them, and the market value of our fleet, among other
things, may materially affect our ability to obtain alternative
financing. In addition, debt service payments under our credit
facility or alternative financing may limit funds otherwise
available for working capital, capital expenditures, the payment
of dividends and other purposes. If we are unable to meet our
debt obligations, or if we otherwise default under our credit
facility or an alternative financing arrangement, our lenders
could declare the debt, together with accrued interest and fees,
to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on our fleet,
which could result in the acceleration of other indebtedness
that we may have at such time and the commencement of similar
foreclosure proceedings by other lenders.
We have entered into a commitment letter with a major Chinese
bank, and the above considerations are expected to apply to our
loan agreement with this lender upon our entry into definitive
documentation.
Trading
and complementary hedging activities in Forward Freight
Agreements (FFAs) subject us to trading risks, and we may suffer
trading losses which could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
Due to drybulk shipping market volatility, success in this
shipping industry requires constant adjustment of the balance
between chartering-out vessels for long periods of time and
trading them on a spot basis. A long term contract to charter a
vessel might lock us into a profitable or unprofitable situation
depending on the direction of freight rates over the term of the
contract. From time to time and as our management sees fit, we
may seek to manage and mitigate that risk through trading and
complementary hedging activities in forward freight agreements,
or FFAs. We are exposed to market risk in relation to our FFAs
and could suffer losses from these activities in the event
D-23
that our expectations are incorrect. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to successfully protect ourselves from
volatility in the shipping market at all times. We may not
successfully mitigate our risks, leaving us exposed to
unprofitable contracts, and may suffer trading losses resulting
from these hedging activities.
The FFA market has experienced significant volatility in the
past few years and, accordingly, recognition of the changes in
the fair value of FFAs has caused, and could in the future
cause, significant volatility in earnings.
The
derivative contracts into which we have entered to hedge our
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates could result in
higher than market interest rates and charges against our
income.
We have entered into two interest rate swaps for purposes of
managing our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates
applicable to indebtedness under our Nordea credit facility
which was advanced at a floating rate based on LIBOR. Our
hedging strategies, however, may not be effective and we may
incur substantial losses if interest rates move materially
differently from our expectations. Since our existing interest
rate swaps do not, and future derivative contracts may not,
qualify for treatment as hedges for accounting purposes we
recognize fluctuations in the fair value of such contracts in
our income statement. In addition, our financial condition could
be materially adversely affected to the extent we do not hedge
our exposure to interest rate fluctuations under our financing
arrangements.
Any hedging activities we engage in may not effectively manage
our interest rate exposure or have the desired impact on our
financial conditions or results of operations. At
December 31, 2010, the fair value of our interest rate
swaps was at a loss position (liability) of $11.6 million
(excluding accrued interest payable of $1.9 million). See
Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
We may
be subject to tax on United States source income, which would
reduce our earnings.
Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code, 50% of the gross shipping
income of a vessel owning or chartering foreign corporation,
such as ourselves and our subsidiaries, that is attributable to
transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin
and end, in the United States is characterized as United States
source income and as such is subject to a 4% United States
federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that
corporation qualifies for exemption from United States federal
income tax under Section 883 of the Code and regulations
promulgated thereunder by the United States Department of the
Treasury.
We expect that we and each of our subsidiaries will qualify for
this statutory tax exemption and we intend to take this position
for United States federal income tax return purposes for the
2010 taxable year. However, there are factual circumstances
beyond our control that could cause us to lose the benefit of
this tax exemption and thereby become subject to United States
federal income tax on our United States source shipping income.
For example, if shareholders each owning 5% or more of our
common shares, or 5% Shareholders, together owned
50% or more of our outstanding common shares for more than half
the days of a taxable year, then we would not be eligible for
this statutory tax exemption unless we were able to establish
that among our 5% Shareholders, there are sufficient 5%
Shareholders that are qualified shareholders for purposes of
Section 883 to preclude non-qualified 5% Shareholders from
owning 50% or more of our common shares for more than half the
number of days during the taxable year and we are able to
satisfy certain substantiation requirements regarding the
identity of our 5% Shareholders. Due to the factual nature of
the issues involved, we can give no assurances on our future
tax-exempt status or that of any of our subsidiaries.
If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to exemption under
Section 883 of the Code for any taxable year, we or our
subsidiaries would be subject during those years to a 4% United
States federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income on
a gross basis. The imposition of this taxation could have a
negative effect on our business and would result in decreased
earnings available for distribution to our shareholders.
D-24
United
States tax authorities could treat us as a passive foreign
investment company, which could have adverse United States
federal income tax consequences to U.S.
shareholders.
A foreign corporation will be treated as a passive foreign
investment company, or PFIC, for United States federal
income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross
income for any taxable year consists of certain types of
passive income or (2) at least 50% of the
average value of the corporations assets produce or are
held for the production of those types of passive
income. For purposes of these tests, cash is treated as an
asset that produces passive income and passive
income includes dividends, interest, and gains from the
sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties
other than rents and royalties which are received from unrelated
parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or
business. On the other hand, income derived from the performance
of services does not constitute passive income.
U.S. shareholders of a PFIC may be subject to a
disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect
to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they
receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the
sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.
We do not believe that we were a PFIC during the 2010 taxable
year or that we will be a PFIC with respect to any future
taxable year. In this regard, we intend to treat the gross
income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time
chartering activities as services income, rather than rental
income. Accordingly, we believe that our income from our time
chartering activities does not constitute passive
income, and the assets that we own and operate in
connection with the production of that income do not constitute
assets that produce or are held for the production of passive
income.
There is substantial legal authority supporting this position
consisting of case law and United States Internal Revenue
Service, or IRS, pronouncements concerning the characterization
of income derived from time charters and voyage charters as
services income for other tax purposes. However, it should be
noted that there is also authority which characterizes time
charter income as rental income rather than services income for
other tax purposes. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that
the IRS or a court of law will accept our position, and there is
a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we
are a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance can be given that we would
not constitute a PFIC for any future taxable year if there were
to be changes in the nature and extent of our operations.
If the IRS or court of law were to find that we are or have been
a PFIC for any taxable year, our U.S. shareholders would
face adverse U.S. federal tax consequences. Under the PFIC
rules, unless those shareholders make an election available
under the Code (which election could itself have adverse
U.S. federal tax consequences for such shareholders), such
shareholders would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at
the then highest rates on ordinary income plus interest upon
excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of
our common shares, as if the excess distribution or gain had
been recognized ratably over the shareholders holding
period of our common shares. Please read
Taxation United States Federal Income Taxation
of U.S. Holders United States Federal Income
Tax Treatment of Common Shares Passive Foreign
Investment Company Status and Significant United States Federal
Income Tax Consequences for a more comprehensive
discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to
U.S. shareholders if we are treated as a PFIC.
Obligations
associated with being a public company require significant
company resources and management attention.
We completed our initial public offering in April 2007 and are
subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the other
rules and regulations of the SEC, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires
that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. If we have a material weakness
in our internal control over financial reporting, we may not
detect errors on a timely basis and our financial statements may
be materially misstated. We will continue to need to dedicate a
significant amount of time and resources to ensure compliance
with these regulatory requirements.
We will continue to work with our legal, accounting and
financial advisors to identify any areas in which changes should
be made to our financial and management control systems to
manage our growth and our obligations as a public company. We
will evaluate areas such as corporate governance, corporate
control, internal audit,
D-25
disclosure controls and procedures as well as financial
reporting and accounting systems. We will make changes in any of
these and other areas, including our internal control over
financial reporting, that we believe are necessary. However,
these and other measures that we may take may not be sufficient
to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a
timely and reliable basis. In addition, compliance with
reporting and other requirements applicable to public companies
will create additional costs for us and will require the time
and attention of management. Our limited management resources
may exacerbate the difficulties in complying with these
reporting and other requirements while focusing on executing our
business strategy. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of
the additional costs we may incur, the timing of such costs or
the degree of impact that our managements attention to
these matters will have on our business.
Because
we generate all of our revenues in dollars but incur a
significant portion of our expenses in other currencies,
exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse impact on our
results of operations.
We generate all of our revenues in dollars but we incur a
portion of our expenses in currencies other than the dollar.
This difference could lead to fluctuations in net income due to
changes in the value of the dollar relative to the other
currencies, particularly relative to the Euro. Expenses incurred
in foreign currencies against which the dollar falls in value
can increase, thereby decreasing our revenues. Further declines
in the value of the dollar could lead to higher expenses payable
by us.
We are
a holding company, and we depend on the ability of our
subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our
financial obligations.
We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our
operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no
significant assets other than the equity interests in our
subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to satisfy our financial
obligations depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to
distribute funds to us. If we are unable to obtain funds from
our subsidiaries, we may not be able to satisfy our financial
obligations.
There
is no guarantee that there will continue to be an active and
liquid public market for shareholders to resell our common stock
in the future.
The price of our common stock may be volatile and may fluctuate
due to factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly and annual
results and those of other public
|
|
|
|
companies in our industry;
|
|
|
|
mergers and strategic alliances in the shipping industry;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in segments of the shipping industry in which
we operate;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulation;
|
|
|
|
shortfalls in our operating results relative to levels forecast
by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
announcements concerning us or our competitors; and
|
|
|
|
the general state of the securities market.
|
The drybulk and tanker industries have been highly unpredictable
and volatile. The market for our common stock may be equally
volatile.
Our
Board of Directors has determined to suspend the payment of cash
dividends as a result of market conditions in the international
shipping industry and until such market conditions significantly
improve, it is unlikely that we will reinstate the payment of
dividends and if reinstated, it is likely that any dividend
payments would be at reduced levels.
We previously paid regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis
from our operating surplus, in amounts substantially equal to
our available cash from operations in the previous quarter, less
any cash reserves for drydockings and working capital, as
determined by our Board of Directors.
D-26
Our Board of Directors has determined to suspend the payment of
cash dividends as a result of market conditions in the
international shipping industry and in particular the sharp
decline in charter rates and vessel values in the drybulk
sector. Until such market conditions significantly improve, it
is unlikely that we will reinstate the payment of dividends and
if reinstated, it is likely that any dividend payments would be
at reduced levels. Furthermore, the amendatory agreement to our
Nordea credit facility, which matures in October 2015, prohibits
us from paying dividends.
As a result of deteriorating market conditions and restrictions
imposed by our lenders, we will not reinstate the payment of
dividends until our Nordea credit facility matures in October
2015 or the prohibition on our payment of dividends is removed
from our amended Nordea credit facility agreement. If
reinstated, any dividend payments would likely be at reduced
levels.
Future
sales of shares by our major shareholder could cause the market
price of our common shares to decline.
Companies controlled by Mr. Antonis Kandylidis,
beneficially own an aggregate of 60,017,141 common shares, which
represent approximately 50.5% of our outstanding common shares
as of the date of this Annual Report. These common shares may be
sold in registered transactions and may also be resold subject
to the holding period, volume, manner of sale and notice
requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Sales or
the possibility of sales of substantial amounts of our common
shares by these shareholders in the public markets could
adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
We are
incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does
not have a well-developed body of corporate law and as a result,
shareholders may have fewer rights and protections under
Marshall Islands law than under a typical jurisdiction in the
United States.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation and by-laws and by the Marshall
Islands Business Corporations Act, or BCA. The provisions of the
BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of
states in the United States. However, there have been few
judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands
interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities
of directors under the law of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and
fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or
judicial precedent in existence in certain United States
jurisdictions. Shareholder rights may differ as well. While the
BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, or
judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states
with substantially similar legislative provisions, our public
shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their
interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or
controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a
corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction.
It may
not be possible for investors to enforce U.S. judgments against
us.
We and all of our subsidiaries are incorporated in jurisdictions
outside the U.S. and substantially all of our assets and
those of our subsidiaries are located outside the U.S. In
addition, most of our directors and officers are non-residents
of the U.S., and all or a substantial portion of the assets of
these non-residents are located outside the U.S. As a
result, it may be difficult or impossible for
U.S. investors to serve process within the U.S. upon
us, our subsidiaries or our directors and officers or to enforce
a judgment against us for civil liabilities in U.S. courts.
In addition, you should not assume that courts in the countries
in which we or our subsidiaries are incorporated or where our
assets or the assets of our subsidiaries are located
(1) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in
actions against us or our subsidiaries based upon the civil
liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state
securities laws or (2) would enforce, in original actions,
liabilities against us or our subsidiaries based on those laws.
D-27
Anti-takeover
provisions in our organizational documents could make it
difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current
board of directors or have the effect of discouraging, delaying
or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely
affect the market price of our common shares.
Several provisions of our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our
shareholders to change the composition of our board of directors
in any one year, preventing them from changing the composition
of management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage,
delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that shareholders may
consider favorable.
These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorizing our board of directors to issue blank
check preferred stock without shareholder approval;
|
|
|
|
providing for a classified board of directors with staggered,
three-year terms;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
authorizing the removal of directors only for cause and only
upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a two-thirds
majority of the outstanding shares of our common and
subordinated shares, voting as a single class, entitled to vote
for the directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the persons who may call special meetings of
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for election to our
board of directors or proposing matters that can be acted on by
shareholders at shareholder meetings; and
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to enter into business combination
transactions with certain shareholders.
|
In addition, we have adopted a stockholder rights plan or
poison pill. These anti-takeover provisions could
substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to
benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely
affect the market price of our common shares and your ability to
realize any potential change of control premium.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Information
on the Company
|
|
|
A.
|
History
and Development of the Company
|
OceanFreight Inc. was incorporated on September 11, 2006
under the laws of the Marshall Islands. Our principal executive
offices are at 80 Kifissias Avenue, Athens 15125, Greece. Our
telephone number at that address is +30 210 614 0283. Our
website is www.oceanfreightinc.com. The information on our
website or accessible through our website shall not be deemed a
part of this report. Our agent and authorized representative in
the United States is Puglisi & Associates,
located at 850 Library Ave, Newark, DE 19711.
In April 2007; we completed our initial public offering in the
United States under the United States Securities Act of
1933, as amended, the net proceeds of which amounted to
$216.8 million. The Companys common shares are listed
on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol OCNF.
We are a global provider of shipping transportation services. We
specialize in transporting drybulk cargoes, including such
commodities as iron ore, coal, grain and other materials and
crude oil cargoes through the ownership and operation of six
drybulk carriers and one tanker vessels as of the date of this
report. As of December 31, 2010, our fleet consisted of
five Panamax and four Capesize drybulk carriers, one Aframax and
one Suezmax tanker vessels with a total capacity of
1.3 million dead weight tons (dwt) and a weighted average
age of 9.7 years. In addition, we have agreed to acquire
five newbuilding Very Large Ore Carriers with deliveries
expected between 2012 and 2013.
From January 2009 through July 2009, Cardiff assumed the
technical and commercial management of the eight Panamax drybulk
carriers previously under the commercial management of Wallem
Ship Management Ltd., or Wallem.
On January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Standby
Equity Purchase Agreement, or the SEPA, with YA Global Master
SPV Ltd., or YA Global, for the offer and sale of up to
$147,885,850 of our common shares, par value
D-28
$0.01 per share. Until May 21, 2009, when the SEPA was
terminated, we had sold 71,850,000 common shares with net
proceeds amounting to $109.9 million, of which
$25 million was used to fully repay the sellers
credit of the
M/T
Tamara and M/T Tigani. YA Global received a
discount equal to 1.5% of the gross proceeds or
$1.7 million.
In May 2009, we signed a memorandum of agreement with a third
party to sell the M/V Lansing at a price of
$21.95 million, which resulted in a loss of approximately
$14.77 million. The vessel was delivered to its new owners
on July 1, 2009.
In May 2009, we engaged in Forward Freight Agreement, or FFA,
trading activities. As of December 31, 2010, the Company
had no open positions.
On June 26, 2009, we agreed to acquire the M/V Partagas
for a purchase price of $56 million. The vessel was
delivered to the Company on July 30, 2009. The vessel is
employed under a three-year time charter that commenced upon the
vessels delivery at a gross daily rate of $27,500.
On July 8, 2009, we agreed to acquire the M/V Robusto
for a purchase price of $61.25 million. We took
delivery of the vessel on October 19, 2009. Upon delivery
to the Company, the vessel commenced a time charter employment
for a minimum period of five years at a gross rate of $26,000
per day.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a memorandum of
agreement with a third party for the sale of the M/V Juneau
for a sale price of $19.9 million. The vessel was
delivered to its new owners on October 23, 2009. The sale
resulted in a loss of approximately $16.3 million.
On July 13, 2009, during the Companys annual general
meeting of shareholders, the Companys shareholders
approved an amendment to the Companys articles of
incorporation to increase the Companys authorized common
shares from 31,666,667 (95,000,000 before the reverse stock
split, which took effect June 17, 2010) common shares
to 333,333,333 (1,000,000,000 before the reverse stock split)
common shares. In connection with the reverse stock split, our
shareholders approved another amendment to the Companys
articles of incorporation, effective June 10, 2010, to
decrease the Companys authorized shares in the same 3:1
ratio as the reverse stock split, which reduced the
1,000,000,000 authorized common shares on a pre-reverse stock
split basis to 333,333,333 authorized common shares after giving
effect to the reverse stock split.
On July 18, 2009, we agreed to acquire the M/V Cohiba
for a purchase price of $61.25 million. The vessel was
delivered on December 9, 2009 and commenced a minimum five
year time charter at a gross daily rate of $26,250.
On July 24, 2009, we entered into a Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement, or the SEDA, with YA Global, for the
offer and sale of up to $450 million of the Companys
common shares to YA Global. The SEDA commenced on
September 28, 2009 and had an available duration of three
years. Upon termination of the SEDA on March 18, 2010, we
had sold 29,401,836 (88,205,508 before the reverse stock split)
common shares with net proceeds amounting to $98.2 million.
YA Global received a discount equal to 1.5% of the gross
proceeds or $1.5 million.
On August 7, 2009, we entered into a memorandum of
agreement with a third party for the sale of M/V Richmond
for a sale price of $20.6 million. The vessel was
delivered to its new owners on September 30, 2009. The sale
of the vessel resulted in a loss of approximately
$20.8 million.
On September 30, 2009, we agreed to acquire the M/V
Montecristo for a purchase price of $49.5 million.
The vessel was delivered to us on June 28, 2010 and
commenced a minimum four-year time charter employment at a gross
rate of $23,500 per day.
On November 24, 2009, DVB consented to a reduction of the
collateral maintenance coverage ratio in our DVB loan to 125%
for the period from November 24, 2009 to December 17,
2010 and the deposit of $2.5 million in the retention
account that was restricted during the above period. As of
December 31, 2010, following the sale of the M/T Tigani,
the Company met the collateral ratio requirement and the bank
released the $2.5 million from restricted cash.
On November 26, 2009, we contracted to sell the M/T
Olinda for a gross sale price of $19.0 million with
expected delivery between May 1, 2010 and December 31,
2010. In December 2010 the vessels delivery period changed
to between December 1, 2010 and April 30, 2011.
D-29
On December 11, 2009, we contracted to sell the M/V
Pierre to a third party for a gross sale price of
$22.6 million, which resulted in a loss of approximately
$17.4 million. The vessel was delivered to its new owners
on April 14, 2010.
On January 12, 2010, we filed a shelf registration
statement on
Form F-3,
which was declared effective on January 21, 2010, pursuant
to which we may sell up to $400 million of an
undeterminable number of securities. No shares have been issued
under this registration statement as of the date of this Annual
Report.
On January 14, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, under which
30,000,000 common shares were reserved for issuance. On
January 18, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved the award of an aggregate of 1,066,666
(3,200,000 before the reverse stock split) common shares to the
Companys Directors and management. Please refer to
Item 7 below Major Shareholders and related Party
Transactions.
On January 16, 2010 we terminated the time charter of the
M/V Pierre due to the charterers insolvency and failure to
perform, which termination took effect on January 27, 2010,
upon the vessels delivery to a new charterer at the same
gross daily hire rate of $23,000 for the balance of the original
time charter ending in June 2010.
On February 20, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/T Tigani
for a gross sale price of $12.25 million. The vessel was
delivered to its new owners on May 4, 2010. In November
2009 we had previously recognized an estimated loss of
$25.4 million based on an estimated sale price of
$9.6 million, which had been determined in sale
negotiations which were ultimately unsuccessful. Following the
sale in 2010, we recognized a gain of $2.5 million, which
represents the increase from the estimated sale price of
$9.6 million in 2009 to its actual sale price of
$12.25 million in 2010.
On March 4, 2010, we entered into an agreement with a
shipyard for the construction of three Capesize Very Large Ore
Carriers (VLOCs) for an aggregate price of $204.3 million.
The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the first, second and
third quarters of 2012.
On May 28, 2010, Basset Holding Inc., a company controlled
by Mr. Antonis Kandylidis, our Chief Executive Officer,
made an equity contribution of $20.0 million in exchange of
approximately 16,666,667 (50,000,000 before the reverse stock
split) of the Companys common shares. Please refer to
Item 7 below Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions.
On June 10, 2010, our stockholders approved a 3:1 reverse
stock split, pursuant to which every three shares, of our common
stock issued and outstanding, were converted into one share of
common stock. The reverse stock split took effect as of the
start of trading on the Nasdaq Global Market on June 17,
2010 and reduced the number of the then issued and outstanding
common shares from 231,800,001 common shares to 77,266,655
common shares. Accordingly, all share and per share amounts in
this annual report have been retroactively restated to reflect
this change in capital structure.
On June 10, 2010, at the Annual General Meeting of the
Shareholders, Mr. George Biniaris was elected to serve as
Director of the Company for a term of three years. On
June 10, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
designated Mr. George Biniaris as the Chairman of the Audit
Committee and determined that he qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert as defined under Commission rules.
Mr. George Biniaris replaced Mr. Stephen Souras, whose
term expired and who did not stand for re-election at the Annual
General Meeting of the Shareholders.
On June 15, 2010, the technical and commercial management
of our drybulk and the tanker fleets as well as the supervision
of the construction of the three VLOCs were contracted under
separate management agreements to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers
Ltd., respectively, which are related technical and commercial
management companies. Until June 15, 2010, the technical
and commercial management of the Companys fleet was
contracted under separate management agreements to Cardiff
Marine Inc. (or Cardiff), a related technical and
commercial management company. Until July 2009, the technical
management of the drybulk carriers was performed by Wallem and
the technical management of the tanker vessels and the
commercial management of all vessels were performed by Cardiff.
On August 13, 2010, our Board of Directors approved the
termination of the FFA service agreement that the Company
entered into with Cardiff in May 2009, with termination
effective on June 15, 2010.
D-30
On October 4, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/T Pink
Sands and M/V Augusta for $11.1 million and
$20.0 million, respectively. The M/T Pink Sands was
delivered to its new owners on November 4, 2010 and the M/V
Augusta on January 6, 2011. The sale of the vessels
resulted in a total loss of $31.1 million. Furthermore, as
provided by our loan agreement we made a loan prepayment of
$17.4 million.
On November 19, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/V Austin
and M/V Trenton for $22.25 million each. Based on an
addendum signed February 11, 2011, the selling price was
reduced to $21.0 million for each vessel. The vessels were
delivered to their new owners on March 10 and 11, 2011,
respectively. The sale of the vessels resulted in a total loss
of $34.1 million. Furthermore, as provided by our loan
agreement we made a loan prepayment of $24.7 million.
On December 12, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/T
Tamara for $8.6 million. The vessel was delivered to
its new owners on January 13, 2011. Following the sale of
the vessel, our loan with DVB was fully repaid.
On December 17, 2010, our Board of Directors approved the
award of an aggregate of 6,000,000 common shares under the 2010
Equity Incentive Plan to Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a
company controlled by our Chief Executive Officer. Please refer
to Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions below.
Our stock price declined below $1.00 per share for a period of
30 consecutive business days, and on January 25, 2011 we
received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market that we are not in
compliance with the minimum bid price rule and as a result, we
are required to take action during the relevant cure period
ending in July 2011, such as a reverse stock split, in order to
comply with Nasdaq rules.
On February 24, 2011, we accepted a commitment letter with
a major Chinese bank for the financing of up to 60% of the
aggregate contract cost of the three VLOCs discussed above.
On April 1, 2011, we entered into two agreements to
purchase two VLOC vessels under construction of 206,000 DWT
each, through the acquisition of the shares of the relevant
owning companies for a company ultimately controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer in exchange for an
aggregate of 35,657,142 common shares of the Company. The
vessels are scheduled to be delivered in the second and fourth
quarter of 2013. The total outstanding yard payments amount to
$95.04 million, of which $29.7 million is payable in
2012 and the balance is payable in 2013.
OceanFreights
Strategy and Business Model.
Our strategy is to be a reliable and responsible provider of
seaborne transportation services and to manage and expand our
company in a manner that we believe will enable us to enhance
shareholder value by increasing long-term cash flow. We intend
to realize these objectives by adhering to the following:
Strategic Fleet Expansion. We intend to grow
our fleet using our managements knowledge of the seaborne
transportation industry to make accretive, timely and selective
acquisitions of vessels in different sectors based on a number
of financial and operational criteria. We will consider and
analyze our expectation of fundamental developments in the
particular industry sector, the level of liquidity in the resale
and charter market, the cash flow earned by the vessel in
relation to its value, its condition and technical
specifications, expected remaining useful life, the credit
quality of the charterer and duration and terms of charter
contracts for vessels acquired with charters attached, as well
as the overall diversification of our fleet and customers. We
believe that secondhand vessels approximately in the middle of
their useful economic life when operated in a cost efficient
manner often provide better value to our shareholders and return
on capital as compared with more expensive newer vessels.
Tailored Fleet Composition. Our current fleet
consists of six drybulk carriers and one tanker, which we have
agreed to sell. In addition, we have agreed to acquire five VLOC
newbuilding drybulk carriers with deliveries expected between
2012 and 2013. We primarily focus on the drybulk and tanker
segments because the acquisition and employment contracts of
these vessels satisfy our financial and operating criteria. As
we grow our fleet over time, we intend to explore acquisitions
in other seaborne transportation sectors, as opportunities
arise, that also meet our financial and operating criteria. We
believe that monitoring
D-31
developments in multiple sectors will position us to
opportunistically select vessels in different sectors for
acquisition and vessel employment opportunities as conditions in
those sectors dictate. We also believe that this outlook enables
us to lower our dependence on any one shipping sector as we seek
to generate revenues and find attractive acquisition
opportunities.
Fixed Rate Charters. With the exception of the
M/T Olinda, which is employed in a tanker pool, we have
entered into fixed rate period charters for all of our drybulk
carriers and tanker vessels with an average remaining duration
of approximately 42.2 months as of the date of this Annual
Report. We believe these charters will provide us with stable
cash flow and high vessel utilization rates and also limit our
exposure to charter rate volatility. In the future we will
continue to seek fixed rate period charter contracts for our
vessels, which include time and bareboat charters, pursuant to
which the charterer pays a fixed daily charter rate over a
specified period of time. Period charter contracts may include
profit sharing arrangements whereby we receive additional
charterhire when spot charter rates exceed the fixed daily rate
under the period charter. We may also enter into period charters
that afford some exposure to the spot market through floating
rate period charters where the daily charter rate fluctuates in
line with spot rates but cannot fluctuate below a minimum rate,
or floor, or above a maximum rate, or ceiling. We may enter into
short-term spot charters or place additional vessels in pools
which enable participating vessels to combine revenues.
Staggered Charter Renewals. We seek employment
for our vessels based on our analysis and assessment of
fundamental developments in each particular sector of the
industry and the difference in rates for
short-,
medium- and long-term charters. Renewing our period charters at
different times enables us to reduce our exposure to market
conditions prevailing at any one time.
Diversified Charter Counterparties. Our
vessels are chartered to two different charterers operating in
the drybulk carrier sector and our tanker is employed in a spot
market pool. We believe that chartering our vessels to well
established and reputable charterers reduces counterparty risk.
As we grow our fleet over time, we may invest in other seaborne
transportation sectors and seek to further diversify the
end-users of our vessels, thereby enhancing the overall credit
quality of our charter portfolio.
Quality Fleet Managers. Our Fleet Managers
have established a reputation in the international shipping
industry for high standards of performance, reliability and
safety. We believe that contracting with fleet managers that
have achieved this reputation will create greater opportunities
for us to seek employment contracts with well established
charterers, many of whom consider the reputation of the fleet
manager when entering into charters. We believe we derive
important benefits from our Fleet Managers experience,
which enables them to achieve significant economies of scale and
scalability in areas such as crewing, supply procurement, and
insurance which in addition to other benefits, are passed to us
as the vessel owner. We intend to maintain the quality of our
fleet through our Fleet Managers rigorous maintenance
programs. We believe that owning a fleet of well-maintained
vessels will enable us to operate our vessels with lower
operating costs, maintain their resale value and secure
employment for our vessels with high quality charterers.
Shipping
Operations
OceanFreights Fleet. We operate a
diversified fleet in order to reduce our dependency on any one
shipping sector and to capitalize on opportunities for upside
potential in both the drybulk and tanker markets. As of the date
of this Annual Report, our fleet has a weighted average age of
7.7 years and is comprised of the vessels listed in the
table below.
D-32
With the exception of the M/T Olinda, which is employed
in a spot pool, all of our existing vessels are chartered under
long term contracts expiring at various dates, with the latest
possible expiration in 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Built
|
|
Deadweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In metric tons)
|
|
Drybulk Carriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Robusto
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
173,949
|
|
M/V Cohiba
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
174,200
|
|
M/V Montecristo
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
180,263
|
|
M/V Partagas
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
173,880
|
|
M/V Topeka
|
|
|
Panamax
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
74,710
|
|
M/V Helena
|
|
|
Panamax
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
73,744
|
|
Tanker Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/T Olinda
|
|
|
Suezmax
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
149,085
|
|
Dry bulk Carriers to be Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VLOC#1(1)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
VLOC#2(1)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
VLOC#3(1)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
VLOC#4(2)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
VLOC#5(2)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 4, 2010, we entered into an agreement with a
shipyard for the construction of three Capesize Very Large Ore
carriers (VLOCs) for an aggregate price of $204.3 million.
The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the first, second and
third quarters of 2012. |
|
(2) |
|
On April 1, 2011, we entered into two agreements to
purchase two Capesize vessels under construction of 206,000 DWT
each, through the acquisition of the shares of the relevant
owning companies for a company ultimately controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer in exchange for an
aggregate of 35,657,142 common shares of the Company. The
vessels are scheduled to be delivered, upon payment of the
outstanding yard payments, in the second and fourth quarter of
2013. The total outstanding yard payments amount to
$95.04 million, of which $29.7 million is payable in
2012 and the balance is payable in 2013. |
Each of our vessels is owned through a separate wholly-owned
subsidiary. Our vessels operate worldwide within the trading
limits imposed by our insurance terms and do not operate in
areas where sanctions of the United States, the European
Union or the United Nations have been imposed.
Vessel
Management
We have contracted the
day-to-day
vessel management of our fleet, which includes performing the
day-to-day
operations and maintenance of the vessels to two management
companies, which we refer to as our Fleet Managers, who are
engaged under separate vessel management agreements directly by
our respective wholly-owned subsidiaries. In 2008, our eight
Panamax drybulk carriers were managed by Wallem an unrelated
third party technical and commercial management company and our
five remaining vessels were managed by Cardiff Marine Inc., or
Cardiff, a related party. During the period from January 2009 to
July 2009, the management of our drybulk vessels (previously
under Wallem) was progressively assumed by Cardiff. Effective
June 15, 2010, we have contracted the
day-to-day
management of our drybulk and tanker fleets, which includes
performing the
day-to-day
operations and maintenance of the vessels, to TMS Dry Ltd., or
TMS Dry, and TMS Tankers Ltd., or TMS Tankers, respectively.
Both TMS Dry and TMS Tankers, or our Fleet Managers, are related
party management companies engaged under separate vessel
management agreements directly by our respective wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Please see Note 3(a) to our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Previously the management of our fleet was performed by Cardiff
Marine Inc., or Cardiff, a related party management company. In
2010, Cardiff proceeded with an internal restructuring for the
purpose of enhancing its efficiency and the quality of its ship
management services. As part of this restructuring our Fleet
Managers were established as two different
D-33
management companies to undertake the management of part of the
fleet previously managed by Cardiff. Our Fleet Managers utilize
the same experienced personnel previously utilized by Cardiff.
We believe that our Fleet Managers maintain high standards of
operation, vessel technical condition, safety and environmental
protection and control operating expenses through comprehensive
planned maintenance systems, preventive maintenance programs and
by retaining and training qualified crew members. We further
believe that the scale and scope of our Fleet Managers enables
them to achieve significant economies of scale when procuring
supplies and insurance. These economies of scale, as well as our
Fleet Managers ability to spread their operating costs
over a larger number of vessels in conjunction with their cost
containment programs, are expected to result in cost savings to
us. We intend to rely on our Fleet Managers established
operations to help us manage our growth without having to
integrate additional resources since we will rely on their
resources to manage additional vessels we may acquire in the
future.
Our Fleet Managers provide comprehensive vessel management
services including technical supervision, such as repairs,
maintenance and inspections, safety and quality, crewing and
training, supply provisioning as well as vessel accounting.
Our Fleet Managers have implemented the International Maritime
Organization, or IMO, International Management Code for the Safe
Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code. It
also has obtained documents of compliance for their offices and
safety management certificates for their vessels as required by
the ISM Code, as well as certificates for vessels under the
International Ship and Port Security Code, or ISPS Code, as
required by the International Convention for the Safety of Life
at Sea, or SOLAS, and the Maritime Transportation Security Act
Code, or MTSA Code.
Our Fleet Managers have the following departments:
|
|
|
|
|
Operations,
|
|
|
|
Technical,
|
|
|
|
Accounting,
|
|
|
|
Crewing,
|
|
|
|
Insurance,
|
|
|
|
Purchasing,
|
|
|
|
Safety and Quality,
|
|
|
|
Sale and Purchase, and
|
|
|
|
Chartering.
|
Our Fleet Managers provide, under the separate vessel management
agreements, specific
day-to-day
vessel management functions including:
|
|
|
|
|
monitoring the quality and safety of vessel operations;
|
|
|
|
performing general vessel maintenance and inspections;
|
|
|
|
arranging and supervising special surveys, drydockings, vessel
reconditioning and repair work;
|
|
|
|
appointing supervisors, surveyors and technical consultants;
|
|
|
|
ensuring compliance with all country of registry, classification
society and port state rules and regulations;
|
|
|
|
implementing of the Safety Management System (SMS) in accordance
with the ISM code;
|
|
|
|
providing employment, training and performance reviews of
qualified officers and crew;
|
|
|
|
arranging for transportation, repatriation, payroll, pensions
and insurance of seafarers;
|
|
|
|
purchasing of stores, supplies, spares, lubricating oil and new
equipment for vessels;
|
|
|
|
maintaining vessel condition acceptable to charterers and
arranging for physical inspections by charterers;
|
D-34
|
|
|
|
|
providing vessel operating expense budgets and monthly vessel
working capital requirements; and
|
|
|
|
providing vessel accounting and reporting.
|
Vessel Management Agreements. We do not employ
personnel to run our
day-to-day
vessel management activities. Our Fleet Managers are responsible
for all
day-to-day
vessel management functions pursuant to separate vessel
management agreements. Our senior management team, under the
supervision of our Board of Directors, manages our business as a
holding company, including our administrative functions, and we
monitor our Fleet Managers performance under our vessel
management agreements. The vessel management agreements have a
one-year term and are automatically extended for successive one
year terms, unless in each case, advance notice of termination
is given by either party under the terms of the respective
vessel management agreements.
In the event that the management agreement is terminated for any
reason other than a Fleet Managers default, we will be
required to pay (a) management fees for a further period of
three (3) calendar months as from the date of termination
and (b) an equitable proportion of any severance crew costs
which materialize as per the applicable Collective Bargaining
Agreement, or CBA.
Pursuant to the management agreements, we are obligated to pay
our Fleet Managers a daily management fee per vessel of
1,500 ($1,988 based on the exchange rate of
December 31, 2010) and 1,700 ($2,253 based on
the exchange rate of December 31, 2010) for the
drybulk carriers and tanker vessels, respectively. The Fleet
Managers are also entitled to (a) a discretionary incentive
fee, (b) extra superintendents fee of 500 ($676
based on the exchange rate of December 31, 2010) per
day (c) a commission of 1.25% on charterhire agreements
that are arranged by the Fleet Managers and (d) a
commission of 1% of the purchase price on sales or purchases of
vessels in our fleet that are arranged by the Fleet Managers.
Furthermore, the Fleet Managers are entitled to a supervision
fee payable upfront for vessels under construction equal to 10%
of the approved annual budget for supervision cost.
Vessel Employment. We are responsible for all
commercial management decisions for our fleet. We use the global
network of chartering brokers and industry contacts to provide
us with information on charter markets and possible employment
opportunities for our vessels. With the exception of the M/T
Olinda, which is currently employed in a spot market
pool, and which we expect to deliver to its new owners in April
2011, our remaining vessels are presently operating under
long-term time charter agreements as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Estimated Expiration of Charter (*)
|
|
Daily Rate
|
|
Drybulk Carriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Robusto
|
|
August 2014 to March 2018
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
M/V Cohiba
|
|
October 2014 to May 2018
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
M/V Partagas
|
|
July 2012 to December 2012
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
M/V Montecristo
|
|
May 2014 to January 2018
|
|
|
23,500
|
|
M/V Topeka
|
|
January 2012 to April 2013
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
M/V Helena
|
|
May 2012 to October 2016
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
Drybulk Carriers to be Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VLOC#1(1)
|
|
April 2015 to April 2020
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
VLOC#2(2)
|
|
August 2017 to August 2022
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
VLOC#3(3)
|
|
October 2019 to October 2026
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
VLOC#4
|
|
Spot
|
|
|
|
|
VLOC#5
|
|
Spot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The estimated expiration of charter provides the estimated
latest redelivery dates at the end of any redelivery optional
periods not yet exercised. |
|
(1) |
|
Upon delivery of VLOC#1, which is expected in the first quarter
of 2012, the vessel is scheduled to commence time charter
employment for a minimum period of three years at a gross daily
rate of $25,000. |
|
(2) |
|
Upon delivery of VLOC#2, which is expected in the second quarter
of 2012, the vessel is scheduled to commence time charter
employment for a minimum period of five years at a gross daily
rate of $23,000. In |
D-35
|
|
|
|
|
addition the time charter contract provides for a 50% profit
sharing arrangement when the daily Capesize average time charter
rate, as defined in the charter agreement, is between $23,000
and $40,000 per day. |
|
(3) |
|
Upon delivery of VLOC#3, which is expected in the third quarter
of 2012, the vessel is scheduled to commence time charter
employment for a minimum period of seven years at a gross daily
rate of $21,500. In addition the time charter contract provides
for a 50% profit sharing arrangement when the daily Capesize
average time charter rate, as defined in the charter agreement,
is between $21,500 and $38,000 per day. |
We believe that these charters will provide us with stable cash
flow and high vessel utilization rates and also limit our
exposure to freight rate volatility. In addition, renewing our
period charters at different times enables us to reduce our
exposure to market conditions prevailing at any one time.
Spot Charters. Spot charters generally refer
to voyage charters and trip time charters, which generally last
from ten days to three months. A voyage charter is generally a
contract to carry a specific cargo from a load port to a
discharge port for an agreed upon total amount. Under voyage
charters, we pay voyage expenses such as port, canal and fuel
costs. A trip time charter is generally a contract for a trip to
carry a specific cargo from a load port to a discharge port at a
set daily rate. Under time charters, including trip time
charters, the charterer pays voyage expenses such as port, canal
and fuel costs. Under both types of spot charters, we would pay
for vessel operating expenses, which include vessel management
fees, crew costs, provisions, deck and engine stores,
lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs, and for
commissions on gross revenues. We would also be responsible for
each vessels intermediate and special survey costs.
Charterers. We believe that chartering our
vessels to a number of well established and reputable charterers
reduces the risk of default under our charter contracts. As we
grow our fleet over time, we may invest in other seaborne
transportation sectors and seek to further diversify the
end-users of our vessels thereby enhancing the overall credit
quality of our charter portfolio. Our assessment of a
charterers financial condition and reliability is an
important factor in negotiating employment for our vessels. We
generally charter our vessels to major corporations,
publicly-traded shipping companies, reputable vessel owners and
operators, trading houses (including commodities traders), major
producers and government-owned entities.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, 55% of the
Companys voyage revenues were earned from two charterers,
who individually accounted for 44.7%, and 10.3% of such
revenues, respectively.
Competition. We operate in markets that are
highly competitive and based primarily on supply and demand. We
compete for charters on the basis of price, vessel location,
size, age and condition of the vessel, as well as on our
reputation. We arrange our charters (whether period charters or
spot charters) through the use of brokers, who negotiate the
terms of the charters based on market conditions.
Currently, we compete with other owners of vessels in the
drybulk carrier and tanker sectors. Ownership of vessels is
highly fragmented in all sectors of the seaborne transportation
industry.
The
International Drybulk Shipping Industry.
We currently employ each of our six drybulk carriers under time
charter agreements with an average remaining duration of
approximately 42.2 months as of the date of this Annual
Report.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI), a daily average of charter rates in
26 shipping routes measured on a time charter and voyage basis
covering Supramax, Panamax and Capesize drybulk carriers,
recovered significantly in 2010 as compared to the low of the
fourth quarter of 2008. The 2010 average of the BDI was 2,761,
which is about 5.6% higher than 2009 average and 272% higher
than the December 2008 average of 743. However, this is still
below the BDIs high of 11,844 reached in May 2008.
The decline in the drybulk market since its peak in 2008 has
resulted in lower charter rates for vessels exposed to the spot
market and time charters linked to the BDI. Our drybulk carriers
are presently employed under time charters and are not directly
linked to the BDI. Drybulk vessel values have also rebounded in
part since 2008s steep decline. Charter rates and vessel
values were affected in 2008 in part by the lack of availability
of credit to finance both vessel purchases and purchases of
commodities carried by sea, resulting in a decline in cargo
shipments, and the excess supply of iron ore in China which
resulted in falling iron ore prices and increased stockpiles in
Chinese
D-36
ports. The increase in drybulk vessel values in 2009 resulted
primarily from cheaper prices for raw materials from producing
countries like Brazil and Australia compared to raw materials
produced domestically in Asia; consequently China has increased
its imports of raw materials. In 2008, Chinas iron ore
imports comprised about 65% of the total volume of iron
transported by sea. In 2009, this number has increased to about
80%, while in 2010 this number dropped slightly due to global
recovery of the steel industry. There can be no assurance as to
how long charter rates and vessel values will remain at their
current levels or whether they will experience significant
volatility. Average daily Capesize rates improved significantly
to approximately $42,600 for the year ended December 31,
2009, but declined to approximately $33,000 per day in the year
ended December 31, 2010.
The global drybulk carrier fleet may be divided into four
categories based on a vessels carrying capacity. These
categories consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Capesize vessels, which have carrying capacities of more than
85,000 dwt. These vessels generally operate along long haul iron
ore and coal trade routes. There are relatively few ports around
the world with the infrastructure to accommodate vessels of this
size.
|
|
|
|
Panamax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 60,000 and
85,000 dwt. These vessels carry coal, grains, and, to a lesser
extent, minor bulks, including steel products, forest products
and fertilizers. Panamax vessels are able to pass through the
Panama Canal, thereby making them more versatile than larger
vessels.
|
|
|
|
Handymax vessels, which have a carrying capacity of between
35,000 and 60,000 dwt. These vessels operate along a large
number of geographically dispersed global trade routes mainly
carrying grains and minor bulks. Vessels below 60,000 dwt are
sometimes built with on-board cranes, thereby enabling them to
load and discharge cargo in countries and ports with limited
infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Handysize vessels, which have a carrying capacity of up to
35,000 dwt. These vessels carry exclusively minor bulk cargo.
Increasingly, these vessels have operated along regional trading
routes. Handysize vessels are well suited for small ports with
length and draft restrictions that may lack the infrastructure
for cargo loading and unloading.
|
As of January 1, 2011, total newbuilding orders had been
placed for an aggregate of about 51.9% of the existing global
drybulk fleet, with deliveries expected during the next
36 months. According to market sources about 50% of the
drybulk fleet is contracted at established yards, while the
other 50% is contracted at yards that are less established and
whose viability may be uncertain. Many analysts expect that
newbuilding orders may experience significant cancellations
and/or
slippage, defined as the difference between newbuilding
deliveries ordered versus actually delivered, in each case due
to a lack of financing in the industry. Market sources indicate
that slippage in the Handysize sector is about 50% and about 20%
in the Capesize sector. The supply of drybulk carriers is
dependent on the delivery of new vessels and the removal of
vessels from the global fleet, either through scrapping or
accidental losses. The level of scrapping activity is generally
a function of scrapping prices in relation to current and
prospective charter market conditions, as well as operating
repair and survey costs. Scrapping in 2009 had been significant
compared to the previous two years, while in 2010 it slowed down
due to the recovery of the drybulk market. In 2009, about
10 million dwt was removed from the global drybulk fleet
representing 30% of the carrying capacity of the total fleet
delivered during the same year. Total drybulk scrapping during
2008 was 5.5 million dwt. As of the end of December 2010,
about 24% of the total dry bulk fleet is 20 years old or
older. Many analysts expect scrapping to continue to be a
significant factor in offsetting the total supply of the drybulk
fleet.
The
International Tanker Industry.
We currently operate one tanker that we have agreed to sell. In
the future, we may purchase additional tankers. The tanker
industry has an inherent volatility that is caused by seasonal
demand fluctuations. During the fall, refineries typically build
stockpiles to cover demand for heating distillates during the
winter. Early in the spring the refineries move into a
maintenance period in order to switch production to gasoline
instead of heavy distillates. This results in the reduction of
required seaborne transportation of oil. As a general pattern,
demand for petroleum products during the summer is less than the
demand for such products during the winter. This seasonality is
reflected in the time charter equivalent rate for Suezmax tanker
route loading in West Africa and discharging in the
D-37
U.S. Atlantic Coast. This rate averaged $18,796 per day
during August 2010 compared to $32,503 per day during December
2010.
In response to a significant decline in oil prices during 2008,
OPEC significantly reduced oil supply, causing WTI oil prices to
recover from a low of $34 per barrel in December 2008 to an
average WTI oil price of approximately $62 per barrel in 2009
and approximately $80 per barrel in 2010. During the last OPEC
meeting, the ministers agreed to leave existing output targets
unchanged in order to help economic recovery by avoiding further
increases of oil prices during the economic recession. The
decline in oil supply had an adverse effect on the demand for
tankers and tanker charter rates.
For 2010, newbuilding deliveries for Suezmax vessels amounted to
about 6.2 million dwt tons or 25.2% of the total Suezmax
orderbook of 24.6 million dwt tons. During the same period
the newbuilding deliveries for Aframax vessels amounted to
7.5 million dwt tons or 48.1% of the total Aframax
orderbook of 15.6 million dwt tons. As of January 1,
2011, the total tanker newbuilding orderbook stood at about
124.6 million dwt. It is expected that about
62.8 million dwt of tankers in excess of 10,000 dwt will be
delivered in 2011.
Tanker vessels generally fall into one of seven major types of
vessel classifications based upon carrying capacity:
ULCCs (Ultra Large Crude Carriers), with a cargo carrying
capacity of 320,000 dwt or more;
VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers), with a cargo carrying
capacity of approximately 200,000 to 320,000 dwt;
Suezmax tankers, with a cargo carrying capacity of
approximately 120,000 to 200,000 dwt;
Aframax tankers, with a cargo carrying capacity of
approximately 80,000 to 120,000 dwt;
Panamax tankers, with a cargo carrying capacity of
approximately 60,000 to 80,000 dwt;
Handymax tankers, with a cargo carrying capacity of
approximately 30,000 to 60,000 dwt; and
Handysize tankers, with a cargo carrying capacity of
approximately 10,000 to 30,000 dwt.
Additionally, tankers are differentiated by the type of cargo
that they carry. The industry identifies tankers as either
product tankers or crude oil tankers on the basis of various
factors including technical specifications and trading
histories. Crude oil tankers carry crude oil and so-called
dirty products such as fuel oils. Product tankers
carry refined petroleum products such as gasoline, jet fuel,
kerosene, naphtha and gas oil, which are often referred to as
clean products.
Product tankers are tankers that typically have cargo handling
systems that are designed to transport several different refined
products simultaneously, such as gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene,
naphtha and heating oil, from refineries to the ultimate
consumer. Product tankers generally have coated cargo tanks that
assist in tank cleaning between voyages involving different
cargoes. This coating also protects the steel in the tanks from
corrosive cargoes.
Product tankers generally range in size from 10,000 dwt to
80,000 dwt, although there are some larger product carriers
designed for niche long-range trades like the Middle East to
Southeast Asia.
Although product tankers can carry dirty products, they
generally do not switch between clean and dirty cargoes because
a vessel carrying dirty cargo must undergo a cleaning process
prior to loading clean cargo. In addition, specified design,
outfitting and technical factors tend to make some vessels
better suited to handling the physical properties of distinct
cargoes.
ULCCs and VLCCs carry the largest percentage of crude oil
transported by sea. These large tankers are typically on
long-haul voyages, but port constraints limit their trading
routes. For example, only a few U.S. ports, such as the
Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, are capable of handling a fully
laden VLCC.
Suezmax tankers engage in a range of crude oil trades, usually
from West Africa to the United States, the Gulf of Mexico, the
Caribbean or Europe, within the Mediterranean, or within Asia.
Most Aframax tankers carry dirty products in short regional
trades, mainly within Northwest Europe, within the Caribbean,
within the Mediterranean
D-38
or within Asia. Panamax tankers, which are the largest tankers
that can pass fully-loaded through the Panama Canal, take
advantage of size restrictions on larger vessels in South and
North American terminals. Three-quarters of the worlds
Panamax fleet transports dirty products and the remainder
transports clean products.
Handymax and Handysize tankers carry the vast majority of clean
products, comprising 90% of all product tankers. Handymax
tankers comprise the largest concentration of product tankers
because smaller tankers have the greatest flexibility in trade
routes and port access. They can service many ports and utilize
berthing facilities, which cannot accommodate larger tankers due
to size limitations or because those tankers require deeper
water in which to operate. Also, port facilities may lack
sufficient storage capacity to unload the large loads carried by
larger tankers. At the same time, Handymax tankers can load a
variety of different cargoes and thereby operate in a number of
international oil and oil product trading routes.
Charterhire Rates. Charterhire rates paid for
drybulk carriers are primarily a function of the underlying
balance between vessel supply and demand, although at times
other factors may play a role. Furthermore, the pattern seen in
charter rates is broadly mirrored across the different charter
types and among the different drybulk carrier categories.
However, because demand for larger drybulk carriers is affected
by the volume and pattern of trade in a relatively small number
of commodities, charterhire rates (and vessel values) of larger
ships tend to be more volatile than those for smaller vessels.
In the time charter market, rates vary depending on the length
of the charter period and vessel specific factors such as age,
speed and fuel consumption. In the voyage charter market, rates
are influenced by cargo size, commodity, port dues and canal
transit fees, as well as delivery and redelivery regions. In
general, a larger cargo size is quoted at a lower rate per ton
than a smaller cargo size. Routes with costly ports or canals
generally command higher rates than routes with low port dues
and no canals to transit.
Voyages with a load port within a region that includes ports
where vessels usually discharge cargo or a discharge port within
a region with ports where vessels load cargo also are generally
quoted at lower rates, because such voyages generally increase
vessel utilization by reducing the unloaded portion (or ballast
leg) that is included in the calculation of the return charter
to a loading area.
Within the drybulk shipping industry, the charterhire rate
references most likely to be monitored are the freight rate
indices issued by the Baltic Exchange. These references are
based on actual charterhire rates under charter entered into by
market participants as well as daily assessments provided to the
Baltic Exchange by a panel of major shipbrokers. The Baltic
Panamax Index is the index with the longest history.
Vessel Prices. Drybulk vessel prices, both for
newbuildings and secondhand vessels, have also rebounded in part
in 2010 following 2008s steep decline. The decrease from
the peak prices seen in 2008 is a result of the reduction in
drybulk freight rates, which occurred during the fourth quarter
of 2008.
Vessel values have also declined as a result of a slowdown in
the availability of global credit. The lack of credit has
resulted in the restriction to fund both vessel purchases and
purchases of commodities carried by sea.
As a result of the decline in oil demand and commensurate
decline in tanker charter rates, tanker vessel values have also
declined significantly, especially for the older vessels since
competition is more evidenced in depressed markets where the
charterers will choose younger vessels over older or single hull
vessels.
There can be no assurance as to how long charterhire rates and
vessel values will remain depressed or whether they will drop
any further. Should charterhire rates remain at these depressed
levels for some time our revenue and profitability will be
adversely affected.
Crewing
and Shore-based Employees
We, through our vessel-owning subsidiaries, currently employ 162
seafarers onboard our vessels. OceanFreight Inc. employs five
persons: our Chief Executive Officer; our Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and interim Chief Accounting Officer; our
President and Chief Operating Officer and two other employees.
Pursuant to our management agreements we utilize TMS Dry Ltd and
TMS Tankers Ltd, with approximately 73 shore-based employees,
for commercial management services and supervisory services in
connection with the technical and commercial management of our
vessels.
D-39
As is common practice in the shipping industry, our Fleet
Managers are responsible for identifying, screening and
recruiting directly or through a crewing agent, the officers and
all other crew members for our vessels who are employed by our
vessel owning subsidiaries.
Permits
and Authorizations
We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental
agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates
with respect to our vessels. The kinds of permits, licenses and
certificates required depend upon several factors, including the
commodity transported, the waters in which the vessel operates,
the nationality of the vessels crew and the age of a
vessel. We have been able to obtain all permits, licenses and
certificates currently required to permit our vessels to
operate. Additional laws and regulations, environmental or
otherwise, may be adopted which could limit our ability to do
business or increase cost of our doing business.
ENVIRONMENTAL
AND OTHER REGULATIONS
Government regulations and laws significantly affect the
ownership and operation of our vessels, which consist of both
drybulk carriers and tankers. We are subject to various
international conventions, laws and regulations in force in the
countries in which our vessels may operate or are registered.
Compliance with such laws, regulations and other requirements
entails significant expense, including vessel modification and
implementation of certain operating procedures.
A variety of government, quasi-governmental and private
organizations subject our vessels to both scheduled and
unscheduled inspections. These organizations include the local
port authorities, national authorities, harbor masters or
equivalent, classification societies, relevant flag state and
charterers, particularly terminal operators and oil companies.
Some of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses,
certificates and approvals for the operation of our vessels. Our
failure to maintain necessary permits, licenses, certificates or
approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or
temporarily suspend operation of one or more of the vessels in
our fleet, or lead to the invalidation or reduction of our
insurance coverage.
We believe that the heightened levels of environmental and
quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators and
charterers have led to greater inspection and safety
requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of
older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental
concerns have created a demand for tankers that conform to
stricter environmental standards. We are required to maintain
operating standards for all of our vessels that emphasize
operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of
our officers and crews and compliance with applicable local,
national and international environmental laws and regulations.
We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial
compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations
and that our vessels have all material permits, licenses,
certificates or other authorizations necessary for the conduct
of our operations; however, because such laws and regulations
are frequently changed and may impose increasingly stricter
requirements, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying
with these requirements, or the impact of these requirements on
the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. In addition, a
future serious marine incident that results in significant oil
pollution, such as the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill, or
otherwise causes significant adverse environmental impact could
result in additional legislation or regulation that could
negatively affect our profitability.
Our vessels are subject to both scheduled and unscheduled
inspections by a variety of governmental and private entities,
each of which may have unique requirements. These entities
include the local port authorities (U.S. Coast Guard,
harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag
state administration (country of registry) and charterers,
particularly terminal operators and oil companies. Failure to
maintain necessary permits or approvals could require us to
incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one
or more of our vessels.
International
Maritime Organization
The International Maritime Organization, or IMO (the United
Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of
pollution by ships), has adopted the International Convention
for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, 1973, as
modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, which has
been updated through various
D-40
amendments, or the MARPOL Convention. The MARPOL Convention
implements environmental standards including oil leakage or
spilling, garbage management, as well as the handling and
disposal of noxious liquids, harmful substances in packaged
forms, sewage and air emissions.
Air
Emissions
In September 1997, the IMO adopted Annex VI to MARPOL to
address air pollution from ships. Effective May 2005,
Annex VI sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide
emissions from all commercial vessel exhausts and prohibits
deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances (such as
halons and chlorofluorocarbons), emissions of volatile organic
compounds from cargo tanks, and the shipboard incineration of
specific substances. Annex VI also includes a global cap on
the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to
be established with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions.
Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may be
adopted that could require the installation of expensive
emission control systems and that could adversely affect our
business, cash flows, results of operations and financial
condition. In October 2008, the IMO adopted amendments to
Annex VI regarding emissions of sulfur oxide, nitrogen
oxide, particulate matter and ozone-depleting substances, which
amendments entered into force on July 1, 2010. The amended
Annex VI is expected to reduce air pollution from vessels
by, among other things, (i) implementing a progressive
reduction of sulfur oxide, emissions from ships by reducing the
global sulfur fuel cap reduced initially to 3.50% (from the
current cap of 4.50%), effective from January 1, 2012, then
progressively to 0.50%, effective from January 1, 2020,
subject to a feasibility review to be completed no later than
2018; and (ii) establishing new tiers of stringent nitrogen
oxide emissions standards for new marine engines, depending on
their date of installation. The United States ratified the
Annex VI amendments in October 2008, and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, promulgated
equivalent emissions standards in late 2009.
On March 26, 2010, the IMO amended MARPOL to designate
areas extending up to 200 nautical miles from the Atlantic/Gulf
and Pacific coasts of the United States and Canada, the Hawaiian
Islands and certain portions of French waters, as Emission
Control Areas under the MARPOL Annex VI amendments. Once
the designations take effect in August 2012, ocean-going vessels
in these areas will be subject to stringent emission controls.
As a result of these designations or similar future
designations, we may be required to incur additional or other
costs.
Safety
Requirements
The IMO has also adopted the International Convention for the
Safety of Life at Sea, or SOLAS Convention, and the
International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, or LL Convention,
which impose a variety of standards to regulate design and
operational features of ships. SOLAS Convention and LL
Convention standards are revised periodically. We believe that
all our vessels are in substantial compliance with SOLAS
Convention and LL Convention standards.
Under Chapter IX of SOLAS, the requirements contained in
the International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation
of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code, promulgated
by the IMO, also affect our operations. The ISM Code requires
the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an
extensive safety management system that includes, among other
things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection
policy setting forth instructions and procedures for operating
its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to
emergencies.
The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a safety
management certificate for each vessel they operate. This
certificate evidences compliance by a vessels management
with code requirements for a safety management system. No vessel
can obtain a certificate unless its manager has been awarded a
document of compliance, issued by each flag state, under the ISM
Code. We have obtained documents of compliance for our offices
and safety management certificates for all of our vessels for
which the certificates are required by the IMO. We renew these
documents of compliance and safety management certificates
annually.
Noncompliance with the ISM Code and other IMO regulations may
subject the shipowner or bareboat charterer to increased
liability, may lead to decreases in, or invalidation of,
available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result
in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. The
U.S. Coast Guard and European
D-41
Union authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance
with the ISM Code by the applicable deadlines will be prohibited
from trading in U.S. and European Union ports, as the case
may be.
The IMO has negotiated international conventions that impose
liability for pollution in international waters and a
signatorys territorial waters. Additional or new
conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted which could
limit our ability to do business and which could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Ballast
Water Requirements
The IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and
Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments, or the
BWM Convention, in February 2004. The BWM Conventions
implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of
mandatory ballast water exchange requirements (beginning in
2009), to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration
limits. The BWM Convention will not enter into force until
12 months after it has been adopted by 30 states, the
combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of
the gross tonnage of the worlds merchant shipping. To
date, there has not been sufficient adoption of this standard
for it to take force. However, the IMOs Marine Environment
Protection Committee passed a resolution in March 2010
encouraging the ratification of the Convention and calling upon
those countries that have already ratified to encourage the
installation of ballast water management systems. If ballast
water treatment becomes mandatory, the cost of compliance could
be significant.
Oil
Pollution Liability
IMO has negotiated international conventions that impose
liability for pollution in international waters and the
territorial waters of the signatory nations to such conventions.
For example, many countries have ratified and follow the
liability plan adopted by the IMO and set out in the
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution
Damage, or the CLC, although the United States is not a party.
Under this convention and depending on whether the country in
which the damage results is a party to the 1992 Protocol to the
CLC, a vessels registered owner is strictly liable,
subject to certain affirmative defenses, for pollution damage
caused in the territorial waters of a contracting state by
discharge of persistent oil. The limits on liability outlined in
the 1992 Protocol use the International Monetary Fund currency
unit of Special Drawing Rights, or SDR. The right to limit
liability is forfeited under the CLC where the spill is caused
by the shipowners actual fault and under the 1992 Protocol
where the spill is caused by the shipowners intentional or
reckless conduct. Vessels trading with states that are parties
to these conventions must provide evidence of insurance covering
the liability of the owner. In jurisdictions where the CLC has
not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law
govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or
in a manner similar to that of the CLC. We believe that our
protection and indemnity insurance will cover the liability
under the plan adopted by the IMO.
The IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability
for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, to
impose strict liability on ship owners for pollution damage in
jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges
of bunker fuel. The Bunker Convention, which became effective on
November 21, 2008, requires registered owners of ships over
1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance or other financial
security for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits
of liability under the applicable national or international
limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in
accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for
Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended). With respect to
non-ratifying states, liability for spills or releases of oil
carried as fuel in ships bunkers typically is determined
by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where
the events or damages occur.
The IMO continues to review and introduce new regulations. It is
impossible to predict what additional regulations, if any, may
be passed by the IMO and what effect, if any, such regulations
might have on our operations.
United
States Requirements
In 1990, the United States Congress enacted OPA to establish an
extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental
protection and cleanup of oil spills. OPA affects all owners and
operators whose vessels trade with the United States or its
territories or possessions, or whose vessels operate in the
waters of the United States, which
D-42
include the U.S. territorial sea and the 200 nautical mile
exclusive economic zone around the United States. The
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, or CERCLA, imposes liability for cleanup and natural
resource damage from the release of hazardous substances (other
than oil) whether on land or at sea. Both OPA and CERCLA impact
our operations.
Under OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are
responsible parties who are jointly, severally and strictly
liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission
of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all
containment and
clean-up
costs and other damages arising from oil spills from their
vessels. These other damages are defined broadly to include:
|
|
|
|
|
natural resource damages and related assessment costs;
|
|
|
|
real and personal property damages;
|
|
|
|
net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, profits or earnings
capacity;
|
|
|
|
net cost of public services necessitated by a spill response,
such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards; and loss
of subsistence use of natural resources.
|
Effective July 31, 2009, the U.S. Coast Guard adjusted
the limits of OPA liability to the greater of $2,000 per gross
ton or $17.088 million for any double-hull tanker that is
over 3,000 gross tons and to the greater of $1,000 per
gross ton or $854,400 for non-tank vessels (subject to possible
adjustment for inflation). and our fleet is entirely composed of
vessels of such classes. CERCLA, which applies to owners and
operators of vessels, contains a similar liability regime and
provides for cleanup, removal and natural resource damages.
Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per
gross ton or $5 million for vessels carrying a hazardous
substance as cargo and the greater of $300 per gross ton or
$0.5 million for any other vessel. These OPA and CERCLA
limits of liability do not apply if an incident was directly
caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety,
construction or operating regulations, or by the responsible
partys gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the
responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to
cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities.
OPA and the U.S. Coast Guard also require owners and
operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the
U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility
sufficient to meet the limit of their potential liability under
OPA and CERCLA. Vessel owners and operators may satisfy their
financial responsibility obligations by providing a proof of
insurance, a surety bond, self-insurance or a guaranty. We plan
to comply with the U.S. Coast Guards financial
responsibility regulations by providing a certificate of
responsibility evidencing sufficient self-insurance.
We insure each of our vessels with pollution liability insurance
in the maximum commercially available amount of
$1.0 billion. A catastrophic spill could exceed the
insurance coverage available, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Owners or operators of tankers operating in the waters of the
United States must file vessel response plans with the
U.S. Coast Guard, and their tankers are required to operate
in compliance with their U.S. Coast Guard approved plans.
These response plans must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
address a worst case scenario and identify and ensure, through
contract or other approved means, the availability of necessary
private response resources to respond to a worst case discharge;
|
|
|
|
describe crew training and drills; and
|
|
|
|
identify a qualified individual with full authority to implement
removal actions.
|
We have obtained vessel response plans approved by the
U.S. Coast Guard for our vessels operating in the waters of
the United States. In addition, the U.S. Coast Guard has
announced it intends to propose similar regulations requiring
certain vessels to prepare response plans for the release of
hazardous substances.
The U.S. Clean Water Act, or CWA, prohibits the discharge
of oil or hazardous substances in U.S. navigable waters
unless authorized by a duly-issued permit or exemption, and
imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any
unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial
liability for the costs of removal, and remediation and damages
and complements the remedies available under OPA and CERCLA. The
EPA regulates the discharge of ballast water and other
substances in U.S. waters under the CWA. Effective
February 6, 2009, EPA
D-43
regulations require vessels 79 feet in length or longer
(other than commercial fishing recreational vessels) to comply
with a Vessel General Permit authorizing ballast water
discharges and other discharges incidental to the operation of
vessels. The Vessel General Permit imposes technology and
water-quality based effluent limits for certain types of
discharges and establishes specific inspection, monitoring,
recordkeeping and reporting requirements to ensure the effluent
limits are met. U.S. Coast Guard regulations adopted under
the U.S. National Invasive Species Act, or NISA, also
impose mandatory ballast water management practices for all
vessels equipped with ballast water tanks entering or operating
in U.S. waters, and in 2009 the Coast Guard proposed new
ballast water management standards and practices, including
limits regarding ballast water releases. Compliance with the EPA
and the U.S. Coast Guard regulations could require the
installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water
before it is discharged or the implementation of other port
facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially
substantial cost,
and/or
otherwise restrict our vessels from entering U.S. waters.
Other
Regulations
In addition, most U.S. states that border a navigable
waterway have enacted environmental pollution laws that impose
strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages
resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous
substance. These laws may be more stringent than
U.S. federal law.
The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended by the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1977 and 1990, or the CAA, requires the EPA to
promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic
compounds and other air contaminants. Our vessels are subject to
vapor control and recovery requirements for certain cargoes when
loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning and conducting other
operations in regulated port areas. Our vessels that operate in
such port areas with restricted cargoes are equipped with vapor
recovery systems that satisfy these requirements. The CAA also
requires states to draft State Implementation Plans, or SIPs,
designed to attain national health-based air quality standards
in primarily major metropolitan
and/or
industrial areas. Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from
vessel loading and unloading operations by requiring the
installation of vapor control equipment. As indicated above, our
vessels operating in covered port areas are already equipped
with vapor recovery systems that satisfy these requirements.
Although a risk exists that new regulations could require
significant capital expenditures and otherwise increase our
costs, based on the regulations that have been proposed to date,
we believe that no material capital expenditures beyond those
currently contemplated and no material increase in costs are
likely to be required.
European
Union Regulations
In October 2009, the European Union amended a directive to
impose criminal sanctions for illicit ship-source discharges of
polluting substances, including minor discharges, if committed
with intent, recklessly or with serious negligence and the
discharges individually or in the aggregate result in
deterioration of the quality of water. Criminal liability for
pollution may result in substantial penalties or fines and
increased civil liability claims.
Greenhouse
Gas Regulation
The IMO is evaluating mandatory measures to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions from international shipping, which may include
market-based instruments or a carbon tax. The European Union has
indicated that it intends to propose an expansion of the
existing European Union emissions trading scheme to include
emissions of greenhouse gases from marine vessels. In the United
States, the EPA has issued a proposed finding that greenhouse
gases threaten the public health and safety. In addition,
climate change initiatives are being considered in the
U.S. Congress. Any passage of climate control legislation
or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, EU, the U.S. or
other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the
international level to succeed the Kyoto Protocol, that restrict
emissions of greenhouse gases could require us to make
significant financial expenditures that we cannot predict with
certainty at this time.
Vessel
Security Regulations
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there
have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel
security. On November 25, 2002, the U.S. Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002, or MTSA, came
D-44
into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July
2003, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the
implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels
operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created
a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with
maritime security. The new chapter became effective in July 2004
and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and
port authorities, most of which are contained in the
International Ship and Port Facilities Security Code, or the
ISPS Code. The ISPS Code is designed to protect ports and
international shipping against terrorism. After July 1,
2004, to trade internationally, a vessel must attain an
International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) from a recognized
security organization approved by the vessels flag state.
Among the various requirements are:
|
|
|
|
|
on-board installation of automatic identification systems to
provide a means for the automatic transmission of safety-related
information from among similarly equipped ships and shore
stations, including information on a ships identity,
position, course, speed and navigational status;
|
|
|
|
on-board installation of ship security alert systems, which do
not sound on the vessel but only alert the authorities on shore;
|
|
|
|
the development of vessel security plans;
|
|
|
|
ship identification number to be permanently marked on a
vessels hull;
|
|
|
|
a continuous synopsis record kept onboard showing a
vessels history including, name of the ship and of the
state whose flag the ship is entitled to fly, the date on which
the ship was registered with that state, the ships
identification number, the port at which the ship is registered
and the name of the registered owner(s) and their registered
address; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with flag state security certification requirements.
|
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with
international maritime security standards, exempt from MTSA
vessel security measures
non-U.S. vessels
that have on board, as of July 1, 2004, a valid ISSC
attesting to the vessels compliance with SOLAS security
requirements and the ISPS Code. We have implemented the various
security measures addressed by MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS Code,
and our fleet is in compliance with applicable security
requirements.
Inspection
by Classification Societies
The classification society certifies that the vessel is
in-class, signifying that the vessel has been built
and maintained in accordance with the rules of the
classification society and complies with applicable rules and
regulations of the vessels country of registry and the
international conventions of which that country is a member. In
addition, where surveys are required by international
conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag
state, the classification society will undertake them on
application or by official order, acting on behalf of the
authorities concerned.
The classification society also undertakes on request other
surveys and checks that are required by regulations and
requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to
agreements made in each individual case
and/or to
the regulations of the country concerned.
For maintenance of the class, regular and extraordinary surveys
of hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any
special equipment classed are required to be performed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Surveys. For seagoing ships, annual
surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery, including
the electrical plant and where applicable for special equipment
classed, at intervals of 12 months from the date of
commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate.
|
|
|
|
Intermediate Surveys. Extended annual surveys
are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically are
conducted two and a-half years after commissioning and each
class renewal. Intermediate surveys may be carried out on the
occasion of the second or third annual survey.
|
D-45
|
|
|
|
|
Class Renewal Surveys. Class renewal
surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out for the
ships hull, machinery, including the electrical plant and
for any special equipment classed, at the intervals indicated by
the character of classification for the hull. At the special
survey the vessel is thoroughly examined, including
audio-gauging to determine the thickness of the steel structures.
|
Should the thickness be found to be less than class
requirements, the classification society would prescribe steel
renewals. The classification society may grant a one year grace
period for completion of the special survey. Substantial amounts
of money may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a
special survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and
tear. In lieu of the special survey every four or five years,
depending on whether a grace period was granted, a ship owner
has the option of arranging with the classification society for
the vessels hull or machinery to be on a continuous survey
cycle, in which every part of the vessel would be surveyed
within a five year cycle. At an owners application, the
surveys required for class renewal may be split according to an
agreed schedule to extend over the entire period of class. This
process is referred to as continuous class renewal.
All areas subject to survey as defined by the classification
society are required to be surveyed at least once per class
period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed
elsewhere. The period between two subsequent surveys of each
area must not exceed five years.
Most vessels are also drydocked every 30 to 36 months for
inspection of the underwater parts and for repairs related to
inspections. If any defects are found, the classification
surveyor will issue a recommendation which must be rectified by
the ship owner within prescribed time limits.
Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance
coverage that a vessel be certified as in-class by a
classification society which is a member of the International
Association of Classification Societies. All our vessels are
certified as being in-class by Det Norske Veritas.
All new and secondhand vessels that we purchase must be
certified prior to their delivery under our standard purchase
contracts and memoranda of agreement. If the vessel is not
certified on the scheduled date of closing, we have no
obligation to take delivery of the vessel.
In addition to the classification inspections, many of our
customers regularly inspect our vessels as a precondition to
chartering them for voyages. We believe that our
well-maintained, high-quality vessels provide us with a
competitive advantage in the current environment of increasing
regulation and customer emphasis on quality.
Risk
of Loss and Liability Insurance
General. The operation of any cargo vessel
includes risks such as mechanical failure, physical damage,
collision, property loss, and cargo loss or damage and business
interruption due to political circumstances in foreign
countries, hostilities, and labor strikes. In addition, there is
always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil
spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities
arising from owning and operating vessels in international
trade. OPA, which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon
owners, operators and demise charterers of any vessel trading in
the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil
pollution accidents in the United States, has made
liability insurance more expensive for ship owners and operators
trading in the United States market. While management
believes that OceanFreights present insurance coverage is
adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no
guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that
OceanFreight will always be able to obtain adequate insurance
coverage at reasonable rates.
Hull and Machinery and War Risk
Insurances. OceanFreight has marine hull and
machinery and war risk insurance, which includes the risk of
actual or constructive total loss, for all of the seven owned
vessels. Each of the owned vessels is covered up to at least
fair market value, with a deductible for the hull and machinery
insurance ranging from $100,000 to $125,000. OceanFreight has
also arranged increased value insurance for all of the owned
vessels.
Under the increased value insurance, in case of total loss of
the vessel, OceanFreight will be able to recover the sum insured
under the increased value policy in addition to the sum insured
under the hull and machinery policy. Increased value insurance
also covers excess liabilities that are not recoverable in full
by the hull and machinery policies by reason of under insurance.
D-46
Protection and Indemnity Insurance. Protection
and indemnity insurance is provided by mutual protection and
indemnity associations, or P&I Associations, which covers
OceanFreights third party liabilities in connection with
its shipping activities. This includes third-party liability and
other related expenses of injury or death of crew, passengers
and other third parties, loss or damage to cargo, claims arising
from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party
property, pollution arising from oil or other substances, and
salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck
removal. Protection and indemnity insurance is a form of mutual
indemnity insurance, extended by protection and indemnity mutual
associations, or clubs. Subject to the
capping discussed below, OceanFreights
coverage, except for pollution, is unlimited.
OceanFreights current protection and indemnity insurance
coverage for pollution is $1.0 billion per vessel per
incident. The 13 P&I Associations that comprise the
International Group insure approximately 90% of the worlds
commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to
reinsure each associations liabilities. As a member of a
P&I Association, which is a member of the International
Group, OceanFreight is subject to calls payable to the
associations based on its claim records as well as the claim
records of all other members of the individual associations, and
members of the pool of P&I Associations comprising the
International Group.
Risk
Management
Risk management in the shipping industry involves balancing a
number of factors in a cyclical and potentially volatile
environment. Fundamentally, the challenge is to appropriately
allocate capital to competing opportunities of owning or
chartering vessels. In part, this requires a view of the overall
health of the market, as well as an understanding of capital
costs and return. Thus, stated simply, one may charter part of a
fleet as opposed to owning the entire fleet to maximize risk
management and economic results. This is coupled with the
challenge posed by the complex logistics of ensuring that the
vessels controlled by OceanFreight are fully employed.
|
|
C.
|
Organizational
structure
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company is the sole owner of
all of the outstanding shares of the subsidiaries, listed in
Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements under
item 18, and in exhibit 8.1.
|
|
D.
|
Property,
plants and equipment
|
We do not own real estate property. We lease office space in
Athens, Greece, as disclosed in Notes 3, 13 and 16 of our
consolidated financial statements under item 18. Our
interests in the vessels in our fleet are our only material
properties. See OceanFreights Fleet in this
section.
|
|
Item 4A.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects
|
The following managements discussion and analysis is
intended to discuss our financial condition, changes in
financial condition and results of operations, and should be
read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial
statements and their notes included in this report.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect
our current views with respect to future events and financial
performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of
certain factors, such as those set forth in the section entitled
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report.
D-47
Factors
Affecting our Results of Operations
Charters
We generate revenues by charging customers for the
transportation of drybulk and crude oil cargoes using our
vessels. With the exception of the tanker M/T Olinda
which is employed in the Blue Fin Tankers Inc. spot market
pool, we employ our vessels to reputable charterers primarily
pursuant to long-term time charters. As of the date of this
annual report, our charters have remaining terms ranging between
26.4 months and 58.1 months. We may employ vessels
under spot-market charters in the future. A time charter is a
contract for the use of a vessel for a specific period of time
during which the charterer pays substantially all of the voyage
expenses, including port and canal charges and the cost of
bunkers (fuel oil), but the vessel owner pays the vessel
operating expenses, including the cost of vessel management
fees, crewing, insuring, repairing and maintaining the vessel,
the costs of spares and consumable stores and tonnage taxes.
Under a spot-market charter, the vessel owner pays both the
voyage expenses (less specified amounts covered by the voyage
charterer) and the vessel operating expenses. Under both types
of charters we pay commissions to ship brokers and to in-house
brokers associated with the charterer, depending on the number
of brokers involved with arranging the charter. Vessels
operating in the spot-charter market generate revenues that are
less predictable than time charter revenues but may enable us to
capture increased profit margins during periods of improvements
in charter rates. However, we are exposed to the risk of
declining charter rates when operating in the spot market, which
may have a materially adverse impact on our financial
performance.
We believe that the important measures for analyzing future
trends in our results of operations consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar days. Calendar days are the total
days the vessels were in our possession for the relevant period
including off hire and drydock days.
|
|
|
|
Voyage days. Total voyage days are the total
days the vessels were in our possession for the relevant period
net of off hire.
|
|
|
|
Fleet utilization. Fleet utilization is the
percentage of time that our vessels were available for revenue
generating voyage days, and is determined by dividing voyage
days by fleet calendar days for the relevant period.
|
|
|
|
TCE rates. Time charter equivalent, or TCE, is
a measure of the average daily revenue performance of a vessel
on a per voyage basis. TCE is a non-GAAP measure. Our method of
calculating TCE is consistent with industry standards and is
determined by dividing voyage revenue (net of voyage expenses)
by voyage days for the relevant time period. Voyage expenses
primarily consist of port, canal and fuel costs that are unique
to a particular voyage, which would otherwise be paid by the
charterer under a time charter contract, as well as commissions.
TCE is a standard shipping industry performance measure used
primarily to compare
period-to-period
changes in a shipping companys performance despite changes
in the mix of charter types (i.e., spot charters, time charters
and bareboat charters) under which the vessels may be employed
between the periods.
|
|
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses, which include vessel
management fees, crew costs, provisions, deck and engine stores,
lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs, are
calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by fleet
calendar days for the relevant time period.
|
D-48
The following table reflects our calendar days, fleet
utilization and daily TCE rate for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Year
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
Tanker
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Vessels
|
|
Fleet
|
|
Calendar Days
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
96.5
|
%
|
|
|
96.6
|
%
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
Time Charter Equivalent
|
|
|
23,194
|
|
|
|
22,544
|
|
|
|
23,022
|
|
Year
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
Tanker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
|
Fleet
|
|
|
Calendar Days
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
94.2
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
Time Charter Equivalent
|
|
|
29,881
|
|
|
|
25,471
|
|
|
|
28,523
|
|
Year
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
Tanker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
|
Fleet
|
|
|
Calendar Days
|
|
|
3,294
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
98.9
|
%
|
|
|
99.8
|
%
|
|
|
99.1
|
%
|
Time Charter Equivalent
|
|
|
33,561
|
|
|
|
38,997
|
|
|
|
34,705
|
|
The following table reflects the calculation of our TCE daily
rates for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
(Dollars
in thousands except for Daily TCE rate)
Year
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
Tanker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
|
Fleet
|
|
|
Voyage revenues and imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
76,186
|
|
|
|
26,004
|
|
|
|
102,190
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(4,329
|
)
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Charter equivalent revenues
|
|
|
71,857
|
|
|
|
25,137
|
|
|
|
96,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total voyage days for fleet
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
Daily TCE rate
|
|
|
23,194
|
|
|
|
22,544
|
|
|
|
23,022
|
|
Year
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
Tanker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
|
Fleet
|
|
|
Voyage revenues and imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
96,672
|
|
|
|
36,263
|
|
|
|
132,935
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(4,309
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Charter equivalent revenues
|
|
|
92,363
|
|
|
|
35,023
|
|
|
|
127,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total voyage days for fleet
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
4,466
|
|
Daily TCE rate
|
|
|
29,881
|
|
|
|
25,471
|
|
|
|
28,523
|
|
D-49
Year
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
Tanker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
|
Fleet
|
|
|
Voyage revenues and imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
114,758
|
|
|
|
42,676
|
|
|
|
157,434
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(5,449
|
)
|
|
|
(8,826
|
)
|
|
|
(14,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Charter equivalent revenues
|
|
|
109,309
|
|
|
|
33,850
|
|
|
|
143,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total voyage days for fleet
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
Daily TCE rate
|
|
|
33,561
|
|
|
|
38,997
|
|
|
|
34,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Charter Rates. Spot charterhire rates are
volatile and fluctuate on a seasonal and year to year basis. The
fluctuations are caused by imbalances in the availability of
cargoes for shipment and the number of vessels available at any
given time to transport these cargoes.
|
|
|
|
Voyage and Time Charter Revenue. Our revenues
are driven primarily by the number of vessels in our fleet, the
number of days during which our vessels operate and the amount
of daily charterhire rates that our vessels earn under charters,
which, in turn, will be affected by a number of factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the duration of our charters;
|
|
|
|
our decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and disposals;
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that we spend positioning our vessels;
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that our vessels spend in drydock undergoing
repairs;
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that our vessels spend in connection with
maintenance and upgrade work;
|
|
|
|
the age, condition and specifications of our vessels;
|
|
|
|
levels of supply and demand in the drybulk and crude oil
shipping industries; and
|
|
|
|
other factors affecting spot market charterhire rates for
drybulk carriers and tanker vessels.
|
As of December 31, 2010, with the exception of M/T
Olinda, M/T Tamara, M/V Augusta, M/V
Austin and M/V Trenton, all of our vessels were
employed under time charter contracts, which had a remaining
duration of a minimum of 30 months and a maximum of
62 months. We believe that these long-term charters provide
better stability of earnings and consequently increase our cash
flow visibility to our shareholders compared to short-term
charters.
The M/T Olinda is employed in a spot market pool. Under
the pooling agreement, the vessel will earn charterhire in
accordance with the pool point formula as defined in the pool
agreement. The pooling agreement provides that charterhire will
be paid 30 days in arrears and bunkers on board at the time
of delivery will be paid with the first hire payment.
Preliminary charterhire will be based on the pools then
current earnings, and is not a guaranteed minimum rate
obligation of the pool company. Hire is inclusive of overtime,
communication, and victualling. The preliminary charterhire may
be adjusted either up or down as necessary by the pool committee
depending on the prevailing market condition of the pool. Each
vessels earnings will be adjusted quarterly according to
their actual operating days in the pool with surplus funds, if
any, distributed based on each vessels rating as defined
in the pool point formula. This vessel is scheduled to be
delivered to its new owners in April 2011.
Lack
of Historical Operating Data for Vessels Before Their
Acquisition
Consistent with shipping industry practice, other than
inspection of the physical condition of the vessels and
examinations of classification society records, there is no
historical financial due diligence process when we acquire
vessels. Accordingly, we do not obtain the historical operating
data for the vessels from the sellers because that information
is not material to our decision to make acquisitions, nor do we
believe it would be helpful to potential investors in our common
shares in assessing our business or profitability. Most vessels
are sold under a standardized agreement, which, among other
things, provides the buyer with the right to inspect the vessel
and the vessels classification society records. The
standard agreement does not give the buyer the right to inspect,
or receive copies
D-50
of, the historical operating data of the vessel. Prior to the
delivery of a purchased vessel, the seller typically removes
from the vessel all records, including past financial records
and accounts related to the vessel. In addition, the technical
management agreement between the sellers technical manager
and the seller is automatically terminated and the vessels
trading certificates are revoked by its flag state following a
change in ownership.
Consistent with shipping industry practice, we treat the
acquisition of a vessel (whether acquired with or without
charter) as the acquisition of an asset rather than a business.
Although vessels are generally acquired free of charter, we have
acquired four vessels with existing time charters and we may do
so in the future. We view acquiring a vessel that has been
entered in a spot market related pool, whether through a pooling
agreement or pool time charter arrangement, as equivalent to
acquiring a vessel that has been on a voyage charter. Where a
vessel has been under a voyage charter, the vessel is delivered
to the buyer free of charter, and it is rare in the shipping
industry for the last charterer of the vessel in the hands of
the seller to continue as the first charterer of the vessel in
the hands of the buyer. In most cases, when a vessel is under
time charter and the buyer wishes to assume that charter, the
vessel cannot be acquired without the charterers consent
and the buyers entering into a separate direct agreement
with the charterer to assume the charter. The purchase of a
vessel itself does not transfer the charter, because it is a
separate service agreement between the vessel owner and the
charterer.
When we purchase a vessel and assume or renegotiate a related
time charter, we must take the following steps before the vessel
will be ready to commence operations:
|
|
|
|
|
obtain the charterers consent to us as the new owner;
|
|
|
|
obtain the charterers consent to a new technical manager;
|
|
|
|
obtain the charterers consent to a new flag for the vessel;
|
|
|
|
arrange for a new crew for the vessel;
|
|
|
|
replace all hired equipment on board, such as gas cylinders and
communication equipment;
|
|
|
|
negotiate and enter into new insurance contracts for the vessel
through our own insurance brokers;
|
|
|
|
register the vessel under a flag state and perform the related
inspections in order to obtain new trading certificates from the
flag state;
|
|
|
|
implement a new planned maintenance program for the
vessel; and
|
|
|
|
ensure that the new technical manager obtains new certificates
for compliance with the safety and vessel security regulations
of the flag state.
|
The following discussion is intended to help you understand how
acquisitions of vessels affect our business and results of
operations.
Our business is comprised of the following main elements:
|
|
|
|
|
employment and operation of our vessels; and
|
|
|
|
management of the financial, general and administrative elements
involved in the conduct of our business and ownership of our
vessels.
|
The employment and operation of our vessels require the
following main components:
|
|
|
|
|
vessel maintenance and repair;
|
|
|
|
crew selection and training;
|
|
|
|
vessel spares and stores supply;
|
|
|
|
contingency response planning;
|
|
|
|
on board safety procedures auditing;
|
|
|
|
accounting;
|
D-51
|
|
|
|
|
vessel insurance arrangement;
|
|
|
|
vessel chartering;
|
|
|
|
vessel hire management;
|
|
|
|
vessel surveying; and
|
|
|
|
vessel performance monitoring.
|
The management of financial, general and administrative elements
involved in the conduct of our business and ownership of our
vessels requires the following main components:
|
|
|
|
|
management of our financial resources, including banking
relationships, i.e., administration of bank loans and bank
accounts;
|
|
|
|
management of our accounting system and records and financial
reporting;
|
|
|
|
administration of the legal and regulatory requirements
affecting our business and assets; and
|
|
|
|
management of the relationships with our service providers and
customers.
|
The principal factors that affect our profitability, cash flows
and shareholders return on investment include:
|
|
|
|
|
rates and periods of charterhire;
|
|
|
|
levels of vessel operating expenses;
|
|
|
|
depreciation expenses;
|
|
|
|
financing costs; and
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States,
or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of those financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant
judgments or uncertainties, and potentially result in materially
different results under different assumptions and conditions. We
have described below what we believe are our most critical
accounting policies that involve a high degree of judgment and
the methods of their application. For a description of all of
the companys significant accounting policies, see
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Vessel Lives and Impairment: The carrying
value of each of our vessels represents its original cost at the
time it was delivered or purchased less depreciation calculated
using an estimated useful life of 25 years from the date
such vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard. The
actual life of a vessel may be different. We depreciate our
vessels based on a straight-line basis over the expected useful
life of each vessel, based on the cost of the vessel less its
estimated residual value, which is estimated at $200 per
lightweight ton at the date of the vessels acquisition,
which we believe is common in the drybulk and tanker shipping
industries.
Secondhand vessels are depreciated from the date of their
acquisition through their remaining estimated useful life.
However, when regulations place limitations over the ability of
a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is
adjusted to end at the date such regulations become effective.
The carrying values of our vessels may not represent their fair
market value at any point in time since the market prices of
second hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter
rates and the cost of newbuildings. Historically, both charter
rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical. We record
impairment losses only when events
D-52
occur that cause us to believe that future cash flows for any
individual vessel will be less than its carrying value. The
carrying amounts of vessels held and used are reviewed for
potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of a particular vessel may not
be fully recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge
would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted
projected net operating cash flows expected to result from the
use of the vessel and its eventual disposition is less than the
vessels carrying amount. This assessment is made at the
individual vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow
information for each vessel is available. Measurement of the
impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. We
determine the fair value of our assets based on management
estimates and assumptions and by making use of available market
data and taking into consideration third party valuations.
We determine undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for
each vessel and compare it to the vessels carrying value.
In developing estimates of future cash flows, we must make
assumptions about future charter rates, vessel operating
expenses, fleet utilization, and the estimated remaining useful
lives of the vessels. These assumptions are based on historical
trends as well as future expectations. The projected net
operating cash flows are determined by considering the charter
revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days
and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed
days (based on the most recent 10 year historical average
of the six month, one year and three year time charter rates for
drybulk vessels, the three year projected time charter rate for
the first three years and the 10 year historical average of
the one year and three year time charter rates thereafter for
the Suezmax tanker vessel), over the remaining estimated life of
each vessel assuming an annual growth rate of 3.0%, net of
brokerage commission for drybulk vessels and no growth rate for
the tanker vessels. Expected outflows for scheduled
vessels maintenance and vessel operating expenses are
based on historical data, and adjusted annually assuming an
average annual inflation rate of 3%. Effective fleet utilization
is assumed to be 99% and 97% for drybulk carriers and tanker
vessels, respectively, taking into account the period(s) each
vessel is expected to undergo her scheduled maintenance
(drydocking and special surveys), as well as an estimate of 1%
off hire days each year for drybulk carriers and 3% for tanker
vessels. We have assumed no change in the remaining estimated
useful lives of the current fleet, and scrap values based on
$200 per Light Weight ton, or LWT, at disposal.
The current assumptions used and the estimates made are highly
subjective, and could be negatively impacted by further
significant deterioration in charter rates or vessel utilization
over the remaining life of the vessels which could require us to
record a material impairment charge in future periods.
In 2009 and 2010, in assessing our exposure to impairment risks
for our fleet, we considered the current conditions of the
international drybulk and tanker industry, the decline of the
market values of our vessels, the deterioration of the
charterhires and the expected slow recovery of the market, the
age of our vessels and the increased costs for their maintenance
and upgrading. As a result we determined that the utilization of
our tanker vessels over their remaining useful lives has been
negatively impacted by the market conditions with low
possibilities for recovery. The assumptions used and the
estimates made are highly subjective, and could be negatively
impacted by further significant deterioration in charter rates
or vessel utilization over the remaining life of the vessels
which could require us to record a material impairment charge in
future periods.
Our impairment analysis as of December 31, 2009 indicated
that the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows of each
of our tanker vessels the M/T Pink Sands and M/T
Tamara were below their carrying value and an impairment
loss was recognized (see Note 2(l) to our consolidated
financial statements). As of December 31, 2010, our
impairment analysis did not indicate any impairment issues on
our vessels.
Vessels held for sale: It is our policy to
dispose of vessels or other fixed assets when suitable
opportunities arise and not necessarily to keep them until the
end of their useful life. We classify assets and disposal groups
of assets as being held for sale in accordance with
ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, when the following
criteria are met: (i) management possessing the necessary
authority has committed to a plan to sell the asset (disposal
group); (ii) the asset (disposal group) is immediately
available for sale on an as is basis; (iii) an
active program to find the buyer and other actions required to
execute the plan to sell the asset (disposal group) have been
initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset (disposal group) is
probable, and transfer of the asset (disposal group) is expected
to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year;
(v) the asset (disposal group) is being actively marketed
for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its
current fair value and (vi) actions required to complete
the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes
to the plan will be made or that the plan will be
D-53
withdrawn. Long-lived assets or disposal groups classified as
held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount
or fair value less cost to sell. These assets are not
depreciated once they meet the criteria to be held for sale and
are classified in current assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet (see Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements).
Imputed Prepaid/Deferred Revenue: Our records
identified assets or liabilities associated with the acquisition
of a vessel at fair value, determined by reference to market
data. The Company values any asset or liability arising from the
market value of assumed time charters as a condition of the
original purchase of a vessel at the date when such vessel is
initially deployed on its charter. The value of the asset or
liability is based on the difference between the current fair
value of a charter with similar characteristics as the time
charter assumed and the net present value of contractual cash
flows of the time charter assumed, to the extent the vessel
capitalized cost does not exceed its fair value without a time
charter contract. When the present value of contractual cash
flows of the time charter assumed is greater than its current
fair value, the difference is recorded as imputed prepaid
revenue. When the opposite situation occurs, the difference is
recorded as imputed deferred revenue. Such assets and
liabilities are amortized as a reduction of, or an increase in,
revenue respectively, during the period of the time charter
assumed. In developing estimates of the net present value of
contractual cash flows of the time charters assumed the Company
must make assumptions about the discount rate that reflect the
risks associated with the assumed time charter and the fair
value of the assumed time charter at the time the vessel is
acquired. Although management believes that the assumptions used
to evaluate present and fair values discussed above are
reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly
subjective.
Voyage Revenue: The Company generates its
revenues from charterers for the charterhire of its vessels.
Vessels are chartered using either voyage charters, where a
contract is made in the spot market for the use of a vessel for
a specific voyage for a specified charter rate, or time
charters, where a contract is entered into for the use of a
vessel for a specific period of time and a specified daily
charterhire rate. If a charter agreement exists and collection
of the related revenue is reasonably assured, revenue is
recognized as it is earned ratably during the duration of the
period of each voyage or time charter. A voyage is deemed to
commence upon the completion of discharge of the vessels
previous cargo and is deemed to end upon the completion of
discharge of the current cargo. Demurrage income represents
payments by a charterer to a vessel owner when loading or
discharging time exceeds the stipulated time in the voyage
charter and is recognized ratably as earned during the related
voyage charters duration period. Unearned revenue includes
cash received prior to the balance sheet date and is related to
revenue earned after such date. For vessels operating in pooling
arrangements, the Company earns a portion of total revenues
generated by the pool, net of expenses incurred by the pool. The
amount allocated to each pool participant vessel, including the
Companys vessels, is determined in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula, which is determined by points awarded to each vessel in
the pool based on the vessels age, design and other
performance characteristics. Revenue under pooling arrangements
is accounted for on the accrual basis and is recognized when an
agreement with the pool exists, price is fixed, service is
provided and collectability has been reasonably assured. The
allocation of such net revenue may be subject to future
adjustments by the pool; however historically such changes have
not been material.
Revenue is based on contracted charter parties and although our
business is with customers who are believed to be of the highest
standard, there is always the possibility of dispute over the
terms. In such circumstances, we will assess the recoverability
of amounts outstanding and a provision is estimated if there is
a possibility of non-recoverability. Although we may believe
that our provisions are based on fair judgment at the time of
their creation, it is possible that an amount under dispute will
not be recovered and the estimated provision of doubtful
accounts would be inadequate. If any of our revenues become
uncollectible these amounts would be written-off at that time.
Accounting for Voyage Expenses and Vessel Operating
Expenses: Voyage related and vessel operating
costs are expensed as incurred. Under a time charter, specified
voyage costs, such as fuel and port charges are paid by the
charterer and other non-specified voyage expenses, such as
commissions, are paid by the Company. Vessel operating costs
including vessel management fees, crews, maintenance and
insurance are paid by the Company. Under a bareboat charter, the
charterer assumes responsibility for all voyage and vessel
operating expenses and risk of operation.
D-54
For vessels employed on spot market voyage charters, we incur
voyage expenses that include port and canal charges and bunker
expenses, unlike under time charter employment, where such
expenses are assumed by the charterers.
As is common in the drybulk and crude oil shipping industries,
we pay commissions ranging from 1.25% to 6.25% of the total
daily charterhire rate of each charter to ship brokers
associated with the charterers.
Depreciation: We depreciate our vessels based
on a straight line basis over the expected useful life of each
vessel, which is 25 years from the date of their initial
delivery from the shipyard. Depreciation is based on the cost of
the vessel less its estimated residual value at the date of the
vessels acquisition, which is estimated at $200 per
lightweight ton, which we believe is common in the drybulk and
tanker shipping industries. Secondhand vessels are depreciated
from the date of their acquisition through their remaining
estimated useful lives. When regulations place limitations over
the ability of a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its
useful life is adjusted to end at the date such regulations
become effective.
Accounting for Derivatives: ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, requires all derivative contracts to be
recorded at fair value, as determined in accordance with
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which is
more fully discussed in Note 10 to our consolidated
financial statements. The changes in fair value of the
derivative contract are recognized in earnings unless specific
hedging criteria are met. The Companys derivative
contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore changes
in fair values have been accounted for as increases or decreases
to earnings.
On January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest swap
agreements with Nordea Bank Finland Plc to partially hedge our
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on
$316.5 million ($236.2 million as of December 31,
2010) of our long term debt discussed in Note 7 to the
consolidated financial statements, by converting our variable
rate debt to fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the interest
swap agreement we and the bank agreed to exchange, at specified
intervals, the difference between paying a fixed rate at 3.55%
and a floating rate interest amount calculated by reference to
the agreed principal amounts and maturities. The gain derived
from the derivative valuation movement is separately reflected
in the consolidated statement of income.
Our forward freight agreements or FFAs did not qualify for hedge
accounting and therefore changes in their value were reflected
in earnings. As of December 31, 2010, we did not have any
open positions.
Segment Disclosures: ASC 280, Segment
Reposting, requires descriptive information about its reportable
operating segments. Operating segments, as defined, are
components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. The Company reports
financial information and evaluates its operations and operating
results by type of vessel and not by the length or type of ship
employment for its customers. The Company does not use discrete
financial information to evaluate the operating results for each
such type of charter. Although revenue can be identified for
different types of charters or for charters with different
duration, management cannot and does not identify expenses,
profitability or other financial information for these charters.
Furthermore, when the Company charters a vessel to a charterer,
the charterer is free to trade the vessel worldwide and, as a
result, the disclosure of geographic information is
impracticable. Accordingly, the reportable segments of the
company are the tankers segment and the drybulk carriers
segment. See Segment Information in Note 15 to our
consolidated financial statements included herein for further
analysis of our two reportable segments.
New Accounting Pronouncements: Please see
Note 2(x) to our consolidated financial statements included
herein for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, none
of which had a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Illustrative
Comparison of Possible Excess of Carrying Value Over Estimated
Charter-Free Market Value of Certain Vessels
In Critical Accounting Policies
Vessel Lives and Impairment, we discuss our policy for
impairing the carrying values of our vessels. During the past
few years, the market values of vessels have experienced
particular
D-55
volatility, with substantial declines in many vessel classes. As
a result, the charter-free market value, or basic market value,
of certain of our vessels may have declined below those
vessels carrying value, even though we would not impair
those vessels carrying value under our accounting
impairment policy, due to our belief that future undiscounted
cash flows expected to be earned by such vessels over their
operating lives would exceed such vessels carrying
amounts. The table set forth below indicates (i) the
carrying value of each of our vessels as of December 31,
2010, (ii) which of our vessels we believe has a basic
market value below its carrying value, and (iii) the
aggregate difference between carrying value and market value
represented by such vessels. This aggregate difference
represents the approximate analysis of the amount by which we
believe we would have to reduce our net income if we sold all of
such vessels in the current environment, on industry standard
terms, in cash transactions, and to a willing buyer where we are
not under any compulsion to sell, and where the buyer is not
under any compulsion to buy. For purposes of this calculation,
we have assumed that the vessels would be sold at a price that
reflects our estimate of their current basic market values.
However, we are not holding our vessels for sale, except as
otherwise noted in this report.
Our estimates of basic market value assume that our vessels are
all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and
if inspected would be certified in class without notations of
any kind. Our estimates are based on information available from
various industry sources, including:
|
|
|
|
|
reports by industry analysts and data providers that focus on
our industry and related dynamics affecting vessel values;
|
|
|
|
news and industry reports of similar vessel sales;
|
|
|
|
news and industry reports of sales of vessels that are not
similar to our vessels where we have made certain adjustments in
an attempt to derive information that can be used as part of our
estimates;
|
|
|
|
approximate market values for our vessels or similar vessels
that we have received from shipbrokers, whether solicited or
unsolicited, or that shipbrokers have generally disseminated;
|
|
|
|
offers that we may have received from potential purchasers of
our vessels; and
|
|
|
|
vessel sale prices and values of which we are aware through both
formal and informal communications with shipowners, shipbrokers,
industry analysts and various other shipping industry
participants and observers.
|
D-56
As we obtain information from various industry and other
sources, our estimates of basic market value are inherently
uncertain. In addition, vessel values are highly volatile; as
such, our estimates may not be indicative of the current or
future basic market value of our vessels or prices that we could
achieve if we were to sell them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dwt
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Drybulk Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trenton
|
|
|
75,229
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
.0 million(1
|
)
|
Austin
|
|
|
75,229
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
.0 million(1
|
)
|
Helena
|
|
|
73,744
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
.9 million *
|
|
Topeka
|
|
|
74,710
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
.4 million*
|
|
Augusta
|
|
|
69,053
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
.0 million(2
|
)
|
Partagas
|
|
|
173,880
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
.9 million*
|
|
Robusto
|
|
|
173,949
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
.8 million*
|
|
Cohiba
|
|
|
174,200
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
.1 million*
|
|
Montecristo
|
|
|
180,263
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
.9 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Drybulk dwt
|
|
|
1,070,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olinda
|
|
|
149,085
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
.0 million(3
|
)
|
Tamara
|
|
|
95,793
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
.3 million(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tanker dwt
|
|
|
244,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL DWT
|
|
|
1,315,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates drybulk carriers for which we believe, as of
December 31, 2010, the aggregate basic charter-free market
value is lower than the vessels aggregate carrying value
by approximately $53.7 million. |
|
(1) |
|
On November 19, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/V Austin
and M/V Trenton for $22.25 million each. Based on an
addendum signed February 11, 2011, the selling price was
reduced to $21.0 million for each vessel. The vessels were
delivered to their new owners on March 10 and 11, 2011,
respectively. The sale of the vessels resulted in a total loss
of $34.1 million. Furthermore, as provided by our Nordea
loan agreement we made a loan prepayment of $24.7 million. |
|
(2) |
|
On October 4, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/V Augusta
for $20.0 million. The M/V Augusta was delivered to its new
owners on January 6, 2011. The sale of the vessel resulted
in a loss of $31.6 million. Furthermore, as provided by our
Nordea loan agreement, we made a loan prepayment of
$11.6 million in connection with this sale. |
|
(3) |
|
On November 26, 2009, we contracted to sell the M/T Olinda
for a gross sale price of $19.0 million with expected
delivery between May 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. In
December 2010 the vessels delivery period changed to
between December 1, 2010 and April 30, 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
On December 12, 2010, we contracted to sell the M/T Tamara
for $8.6 million. The vessel was delivered to its new
owners on January 13, 2011. Following the sale of the
vessel, our loan with DVB was fully repaid. |
We note that six of our drybulk vessels are currently employed
under long-term, above-market time charters. We believe that if
the vessels were sold with those charters attached, we would
receive a premium for those vessels over their basic market
value.
We refer you to the risk factor entitled Because the
market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, we may
incur losses when we sell vessels or we may be required to write
down their carrying value, which would adversely affect our
earnings and the discussion herein under the heading
D. Risk Factors Industry Specific Risk
Factors.
D-57
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
As discussed in Notes 2(t) and 15 to our consolidated
financial statements included herein, we have two reportable
segments, the drybulk carriers segment and the tankers segment.
The table below presents information about the Companys
reportable segments as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010
and for the years then ended, and is expressed in thousands of
U.S. Dollars. The accounting policies followed in the
preparation of the reportable segments are the same as those
followed in the preparation of the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
74,628
|
|
|
$
|
26,004
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,632
|
|
Imputed revenue
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Gain on forward freight agreements
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(4,328
|
)
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
(27,476
|
)
|
|
|
(13,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,078
|
)
|
Survey and dry docking costs
|
|
|
(1,784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,784
|
)
|
Interest expense and finance costs, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
(2,461
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(7,202
|
)
|
|
|
(1,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,713
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(23,252
|
)
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(24,853
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) on vessels sold and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
(65,711
|
)
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,929
|
)
|
Segment (loss)/gain
|
|
|
(62,193
|
)
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
(8,408
|
)
|
|
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
428,187
|
|
|
|
33,588
|
|
|
|
17,088
|
|
|
|
478,863
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
82,199
|
|
|
$
|
36,263
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
118,462
|
|
Imputed revenue
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
Gain on forward freight agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(4,309
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
(27,067
|
)
|
|
|
(16,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,915
|
)
|
Survey and dry docking costs
|
|
|
(2,845
|
)
|
|
|
(2,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,570
|
)
|
Interest expense and finance costs
|
|
|
(7,333
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(12,169
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(30,100
|
)
|
|
|
(18,080
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(48,272
|
)
|
Impairment on vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
Loss from sale of vessels
|
|
|
(69,250
|
)
|
|
|
(63,926
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,176
|
)
|
Segment loss
|
|
|
(46,248
|
)
|
|
|
(124,865
|
)
|
|
|
(7,569
|
)
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
444,180
|
|
|
|
56,253
|
|
|
|
48,839
|
|
|
|
549,272
|
|
D-58
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
104,440
|
|
|
$
|
42,676
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,116
|
|
Imputed revenue
|
|
|
10,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,318
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(5,449
|
)
|
|
|
(8,826
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,275
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
(20,662
|
)
|
|
|
(8,318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,980
|
)
|
Survey and dry docking costs
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
Interest expense and finance costs
|
|
|
(11,173
|
)
|
|
|
(5,316
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(16,528
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(12,076
|
)
|
|
|
(5,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,184
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(32,865
|
)
|
|
|
(10,762
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(43,658
|
)
|
Segment profit/(loss)
|
|
|
31,766
|
|
|
|
4,260
|
|
|
|
(8,304
|
)
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
408,680
|
|
|
|
184,753
|
|
|
|
32,137
|
|
|
|
625,570
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2009
Voyage
Revenues
Voyage revenue decreased by $17.9 million, or 15.1%, to
$100.6 million for 2010 as compared to $118.5 million
for 2009. The decrease in revenues is mainly attributable to the
net decrease in voyage days by 253 days representing
1,224 days lost due to the sale of vessels and 52 off-hire
days which were mitigated by the 1,024 additional days of
operations of the new acquisitions. Furthermore, revenue was
adversely affected by the decline in the charter rates of M/T
Tigani, M/V Topeka, M/V Austin, M/V
Trenton and M/T Olinda and the sale of M/V
Richmond, M/V Lansing, M/V Juneau, M/V
Pierre, M/T Tigani and M/T Pink Sands which
were replaced by M/V Partagas, M/V Robusto, M/V
Cohiba and M/V Montecristo, which earned a lower
average charter rate. The average TCE rate for 2010 was $23,022
per day as compared to $28,523 in 2009, and the fleet
utilization was 96.4% in 2009 as compared to 96.1% in 2009. See
above under Factors Affecting our Results of
Operations TCE Rates for information
concerning our calculation of TCE rates.
Imputed
Deferred Revenue
M/V Trenton, M/V Austin, M/V Pierre and M/V
Topeka were each acquired in 2007 with an existing time
charter at a below market rate. The Company adds the fair value
of the time charters in the purchase price of the vessels and
allocates it to a deferred liability which is amortized over the
remaining period of the time charters as an increase of hire
revenue. The amortization of imputed deferred revenue for 2010
and 2009 amounted to $1.6 million and $14.5 million,
respectively. Imputed deferred revenue has been fully amortized
as of December 31, 2010; see Note 6 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Gain/(loss)
on Forward Freight Agreements
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the loss on FFAs
amounted to $4.3 million as compared to a gain of
$0.6 million in 2009. Such agreements did not qualify for
hedge accounting and therefore changes in their fair value were
reflected in earnings. As of December 31, 2010, there were
no open FFA positions.
Voyage
Expenses
Voyage expenses decreased by $0.3 million, or 5.5%, to
$5.2 million in 2010 as compared to $5.5 million in
2009. The decrease is mainly due to (a) lower port and
bunker costs as a result of the reduced number of off hire days
in 2010 of 157 days (including 88 drydocking days) as
compared to off hire days in 2009 of 184 days (including
144 drydocking days) and (b) to reduced commissions on
revenues as a result of the decrease in revenues.
D-59
Vessel
Operating Expenses
Vessel operating expenses include crew wages and related costs,
the cost of insurance, expenses relating to repairs and
maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores,
management fees, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses.
Vessel operating expenses for 2010 were $41.1 million as
compared to $43.9 million for 2009. Excluding the effect of
expenses related to drydocking activities of $1.0 million
in 2010 and $2.7 million in the same period of 2009, there
was decrease in operating expenses of 2.7%. The decrease is
mainly due to the sale of vessels in 2010 which was partially
mitigated by the additional voyage days of the new acquisitions
and the increased management fees due to the change of managers.
The calendar days in 2010 were 4,371 days as compared to
4,650 days in 2009. The daily operating expenses on a fleet
basis in 2010 were $9,397 per vessel as compared to $9,444 per
vessel in 2009.
General
and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses include the salaries and
other related costs of the executive officers and other
employees, our office rents, legal and auditing costs,
regulatory compliance costs, other miscellaneous office
expenses, long-term compensation costs, and corporate overhead.
General and administrative expenses for 2010 were
$8.3 million as compared to $8.5 million for 2009. The
decrease of $0.2 million is the net effect of (a) the
decrease in office payroll and related cost of
$0.5 million, (b) the increase in compensation cost of
$1.0 million, (c) the net decrease in legal and audit
fees of $0.6 million, and (d) net decrease of
$0.1 million in all other expenses.
Depreciation
Depreciation for 2010 amounted to $24.9 million as compared
to $48.3 million in 2009. The decrease of
$23.4 million in vessel depreciation charges is
attributable to (a) the discontinuance of taking
depreciation on
M/T Olinda,
M/V Augusta, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton and M/T
Tamara due to their classification as vessels held for
sale resulting in a reduction of $11.7 million,
(b) the sale of M/V Richmond, M/V Lansing,
M/V Juneau,
M/V Pierre,
M/T Pink Sands and M/T Tigani and their
replacement by M/V Partagas, M/V Robusto, M/V
Cohiba and M/V Montecristo in 2010 resulting in a
net reduction of depreciation of $11.7 million.
Drydocking
We incurred scheduled drydocking costs in 2010 of
$1.8 million related to M/V Trenton, M/V Austin and
M/V Topeka.
In 2009 we incurred scheduled drydocking costs of
$5.6 million related to M/V Helena, M/V
Pierre, M/T Tamara and M/T Tigani.
Impairment
on Vessels
The carrying value of each of the Companys vessels
represents its original cost at the time it was delivered or
purchased less depreciation calculated using an estimated useful
life of 25 years from the date such vessel was originally
delivered from the shipyard. The actual life of a vessel may be
different. We depreciate our vessels based on a straight-line
basis over the expected useful life of each vessel, based on the
cost of the vessel less its estimated residual value, which is
estimated at $200 per lightweight ton at the date of the
vessels acquisition, which we believe is common in the
drybulk and tanker shipping industries.
Secondhand vessels are depreciated from the date of their
acquisition through their remaining estimated useful life.
However, when regulations place limitations over the ability of
a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is
adjusted to end at the date such regulations become effective.
The carrying values of the Companys vessels may not
represent their fair market value at any point in time since the
market prices of second hand vessels tend to fluctuate with
changes in charter rates and the cost of newbuildings.
Historically, both charter rates and vessel values tend to be
cyclical. The Company records impairment losses only when events
occur that cause the Company to believe that future cash flows
for any individual vessel will be less than its carrying value.
The carrying amounts of vessels held and used by the Company are
reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular
vessel may not be fully recoverable. In such instances, an
impairment charge would be
D-60
recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted projected net
operating cash flows expected to result from the use of the
vessel and its eventual disposition is less than the
vessels carrying amount. This assessment is made at the
individual vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow
information for each vessel is available. Measurement of the
impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. The
Company determines the fair value of its assets based on
management estimates and assumptions and by making use of
available market data and taking into consideration third party
valuations.
Our impairment analysis as of December 31, 2009 indicated
that the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows of each
of our tanker vessels the M/T Pink Sands and M/T
Tamara were below their carrying value and an impairment
loss was recognized (see Note 2(l) to our consolidated
financial statements). As of December 31, 2010, our
impairment analysis did not indicate any impairment issues on
our vessels.
Loss
on Sale of Vessels and Vessels Held for Sale
As of December 31, 2010, we had contracted to sell, on a
charter free basis, the M/T Olinda, M/T Tamara,
the M/V Augusta, the M/V Austin and the M/V
Trenton for an aggregate price of $89.6 million. The
M/V Augusta was delivered to its new owners on
January 6, 2011, the M/T Tamara on January 13,
2011, the M/V Austin on March 10, 2011 and the M/V
Trenton on March 11, 2011. We expect to deliver M/T
Olinda to its new owners in April 2011. We have classified the
above five vessels as held for sale in the
accompanying December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet
at their estimated sale proceeds as all criteria required for
their classification as Held for Sale were met. The
estimated loss of approximately $65.9 million is included
in Loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations.
As of December 31, 2009, vessels held for sale consisted of
the M/T Olinda (see above) and M/V Pierre and
M/T
Tigani, of which the latter two were delivered to their
new owners on April 14, 2010 and May 4, 2010,
respectively, resulting in a gain of $2.5 million included
in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations
under Loss on vessels sold and vessels held for sale.
Vessels held for sale are stated at their fair values. The fair
values were determined based on the memorandum of agreement
prices less cost to sell (Level 1).
Interest
and Finance Costs
Interest and finance costs decreased by $5.4 million, or
44.3%, to $6.8 million in 2010 as compared to
$12.2 million in 2009. The decrease is attributable to the
prepayment of our long term debt by $14.4 million related
to the sale of M/T Pink Sands and M/T Tigani. Financing costs
include amortization of costs incurred in connection with the
issuance of long-term debt of $0.5 million in 2010 as
compared to $0.7 million in 2009. In 2010 interest was
further reduced by $1.0 million representing capitalized
imputed interest relating to the construction of the new
buildings.
The realized loss of 2009 for the swap agreements discussed
further below of $7.7 million previously included in
Interest and finance costs were reclassified to
Loss on derivative instruments to conform to the
December 31, 2010, presentation.
Derivative
Instruments
Swap Agreements: We entered into two interest
rate swap agreements on January 29, 2008 to partially hedge
the interest rate exposure on our variable rate debt. At
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair values of the
derivative contracts amounted to $11.6 million and
$11.0 million in liability, respectively. The decrease in
fair values of $0.6 million is included in Loss on
derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of
operations. The current portion of the total fair value of
$6.7 million is included in current liabilities as
Derivative liability, while the non-current portion of
$4.9 million is included in other non-current liabilities
as Derivative liability in the December 31, 2010
consolidated balance sheet. The realized swap interest for 2010
amounted to $8.1 million.
FFAs: In 2010, the loss on FFAs amounted to
$4.3 million. As of December 31, 2010 we had no open
FFA positions. In 2009, the gain from FFAs amounted to
$0.6 million. There were no open positions as of
December 31, 2009.
D-61
Year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008
Voyage
Revenues
Voyage revenue decreased by $28.6 million, or 19.4%, to
$118.5 million for 2009 as compared to $147.1 million
for 2008. The decrease is mainly attributable to (a) the
sale of three vessels which were replaced by new vessels
chartered at lower hire rates resulting in $11,050 lower daily
hire rate, (b) the employment of the M/T Olinda in a
spot pool in October 2008 resulting in reduction of its daily
TCE rate from $57,176 to $21,600, (c) the early termination
of the charter party of M/V Augusta in November 2008 and
its re-employment at lower daily hire rate resulting in the
reduction of daily hire from $42,100 per day to $16,000 per day,
(d) the early termination of the charter party of M/V
Topeka in July 2009 and its re-employment at lower daily
hire rate resulting in the reduction of daily hire from $23,100
per day to $18,000 per day and (e) the scheduled
drydockings which resulted in 145 off hire days in 2009 as
compared to no days in 2008. The effect of the decrease in hire
rates was mitigated by the increase of voyage days from 4,125 in
2008 to 4,466 in 2009 mainly due to the operation the of M/T
Olinda, M/T Tigani and
M/T Tamara
for the full year in 2009. The average TCE rate for 2009 was
$28,523 per day as compared to $34,705 in 2008, and the fleet
utilization was 96.1% in 2009 as compared to 99.1% in 2008. See
above under Factors Affecting our Results of
Operations TCE Rates for information
concerning our calculation of TCE rates.
Imputed
Deferred Revenue
M/V Trenton, M/V Austin, M/V Pierre and M/V
Topeka were each acquired in 2007 with an existing time
charter at a below market rate. The Company adds the fair value
of the time charters in the purchase price of the vessels and
allocates it to a deferred liability which is amortized over the
remaining period of the time charters as an increase of hire
revenue. For cash flow purposes (excluding the amortization of
the fair value of the time charters) the Company received a TCE
rate of $25,283 and $32,204 per day, in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The amortization for 2009 and 2008 amounted to
$14.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively. The
amount in 2009 includes $6.7 million of accelerated
amortization due to the early termination of the time charter of
M/V Topeka in July 2009.
Voyage
Expenses
Voyage expenses decreased by $8.8 million, or 61.5%, to
$5.5 million in 2009 as compared to $14.3 million in
2008, including commissions which totaled $4.6 million and
$6.5 million, in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease
is attributable to the employment of the
M/T Olinda
in the spot market from her acquisition in January 2008
until late October 2008 with voyage expenses amounting to
$8.3 million. We had no vessels employed in the spot market
in 2009.
When we employ vessels on spot market voyage charters, we incur
voyage expenses that include port and canal charges and bunker
expenses, unlike under time charter employment, where such
expenses are assumed by the charterers.
As is common in the drybulk and crude oil shipping industries,
we pay commissions ranging from 1.63% to 6.25% of the total
daily charterhire rate of each charter to ship brokers
associated with the charterers.
Vessel
Operating Expenses
Vessel operating expenses include crew wages and related costs,
the cost of insurance, expenses relating to repairs and
maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores,
management fees, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses.
Vessel operating expenses for 2009 increased by
$15.0 million, or 51.9%, to $43.9 million in 2009 as
compared to $28.9 million in 2008. The increase is mainly
attributable to (a) the increase in calendar days as a
result of the fact that the vessels were acquired at various
dates in the fourth quarter of 2008 while the same vessels were
operated for the full year in 2009, (b) the additional
running costs incurred as a result of the scheduled drydockings
of four vessels of $2.7 million and (c) the increase
in repairs and maintenance expenses. The daily operating
expenses in 2009 were $9,444 as compared to $6,960 in 2008.
D-62
General
and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses include the salaries and
other related costs of the executive officers and other
employees, our office rents, legal and auditing costs,
regulatory compliance costs, other miscellaneous office
expenses, long-term compensation costs, and corporate overhead.
General and administrative expenses for 2009 decreased by
$0.6 million, or 6.6% to $8.5 million as compared to
$9.1 million in 2008. The decrease is the net effect of the
decrease in office payroll and related cost of $5.6 million
in 2009 from $6.6 million in 2008, which was mitigated by
the increase in legal and audit fees, and other expenses of
$3.1 million in 2009 as compared to $2.7 million in
2008. The 2009 payroll and related costs of $5.6 million
includes $1.96 million payroll cost, $3.6 million
bonuses and $0.04 million compensation costs, while the
2008 amount of $6.6 million includes $1.7 million
payroll cost, $2.2 million bonuses and $2.7 million
compensation costs.
Depreciation
Depreciation in 2009 increased by $4.6 million, or 10.5% to
$48.3 million as compared to $43.7 million in 2008.
The increase is mainly attributable to the increase of calendar
days to 4,650 days in 2009 as compared to 4,164 days
in 2008 due to the ownership of
M/T Olinda,
M/T Tigani
and
M/T Tamara
for the full year in 2009 which was partially mitigated by
the calendar days lost as a result of the purchase and sale
transactions.
Impairment
on Vessels
We wrote down our tankers
M/T Pink
Sands and
M/T Tamara
to their market values by recording an impairment charge of
$52.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2009.
There was no impairment charge in 2008.
Loss
on Sale of Vessels and Vessels Held for Sale
The loss of $133.2 million consists of $51.9 million
representing the loss incurred from the sale of
M/V Lansing,
M/V Richmond
and
M/V Juneau
and from $81.3 million representing the estimated loss
to be incurred from vessels
M/V Pierre,
M/T Olinda
and
M/T Tigani
classified as vessels held for sale.
Drydocking
We expense the total costs associated with a drydocking and
special surveys in the period that they are incurred.
Regulations or incidents may change the estimated dates of the
next drydocking for our vessels. For 2009 and 2008, the expense
related to drydocking totaled $5.6 and $0.7 million,
respectively. Four vessels were drydocked in 2009 as compared to
one vessel in 2008.
Interest
and Finance Costs
Interest and finance costs decreased by $4.3 million, or
26.1%, to $12.2 million in 2009 as compared to
$16.5 million in 2008. Interest expenses in 2009 amounted
to $10.6 million as compared to $14.8 million in 2008.
The decrease is mainly attributable to the loan prepayment of
$25 million made in early 2009 under our amendatory
agreement to our Nordea credit facility, as discussed elsewhere
in this annual report. Financing costs include amortization of
costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt
of $0.7 million in 2009 as compared to $0.5 million in
2008.
The realized loss of the swap agreements discussed further below
for 2008 ($1.0 million) and 2009 ($7.7 million)
previously included in Interest and finance costs
were reclassified to Loss on derivative instruments
to make these prior years comparable with the presentation for
December 31, 2010.
Financing
Costs
Fees incurred for obtaining new loans or refinancing existing
ones, including related legal and other professional fees, are
deferred and amortized to interest expense over the life of the
related debt. Unamortized fees relating to loans repaid or
refinanced are expensed in the period the repayment or
refinancing occurs. The total amortization cost for 2009 and
2008 amounted to $0.7 million and $0.5 million,
respectively.
D-63
Derivative
Instruments
Swap Agreements: We have entered into two
interest rate swap agreements on January 28, 2008 to
partially hedge the interest rate exposure on our variable rate
debt. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the fair values of the
derivative contracts amounted to $11.0 million and
$16.1 million in liability, respectively. The decrease in
fair values of $5.1 million is reflected in Gain on
derivative instruments in the consolidated statement of
operations. The current portion of the total fair value of
$7.4 million is included in current liabilities as
Derivative liability, while the non-current portion of
$3.6 million is included in other non-current liabilities
as Derivative liability in the December 31, 2009
consolidated balance sheet. The realized swap interest for 2009
amounted to $7.7 million.
FFAs: During the year ended December 31,
2009, the gain on FFAs amounted to $0.6 million. Such
agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting and therefore
changes in their fair value were reflected in earnings. As of
December 31, 2009, there were no open FFA positions.
Inflation
Inflation does not have significant impact on vessel operating
or other expenses. We may bear the risk of rising fuel prices if
we enter into spot-market charters or other contracts under
which we bear voyage expenses. We do not consider inflation to
be a significant risk to costs in the current and foreseeable
future economic environment. However, should the world economy
be affected by inflationary pressures this could result in
increased operating and financing costs.
Foreign
Currency Risk
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars, but incur
approximately 2.88% of our expenses in currencies other than
U.S. dollars. For accounting purposes, expenses incurred in
Euros are converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate
prevailing on the date of each transaction. At December 31,
2010, the outstanding accounts payable balance denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar was not material.
|
|
B.
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
Our principal sources of funds are equity provided by our
shareholders, operating cash flows and long-term borrowings. Our
principal use of funds has been capital expenditures to
establish and grow our fleet, maintain the quality of our fleet,
comply with international shipping standards and environmental
laws and regulations, fund working capital requirements, make
principal repayments on outstanding loan facility, and
historically, to pay dividends.
We expect to rely upon operating cash flows, long-term
borrowings, as well as equity financings to implement our growth
plan and our capital commitments discussed in Note 5 to the
December 31, 2010 consolidated financial statements. We
have financed our capital requirements with the issuance of
equity in connection with our initial public offering, our
controlled equity offering and the Standby Equity Purchase
Agreement, or SEPA, the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement,
or SEDA, and the equity contribution from Basset Holding Inc.
discussed in Note 8 to the December 31, 2010
consolidated financial statements, cash from operations and
borrowings under our long-term arrangements, discussed in
Note 7 to the December 31, 2010 consolidated financial
statements. Under the SEPA, SEDA and the contribution from
Basset we issued an aggregate of 70,018,503 of our common shares
(210,055,508 common shares before the reverse stock split
effect) with total net proceeds of $228.1 million. The SEPA
and SEDA were terminated on May 21, 2009 and on
March 18, 2010, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, we had an outstanding indebtedness
of $209.8 million and our aggregate payments of principal
due within one year amounted to $82.3 million. Our loans
contained a minimum cash requirement of $500,000 per vessel,
which, on our fleet of 11 vessels, amounted to
$5.5 million.
As of December 31, 2010, our capital commitments in
connection with the construction of the three VLOCs were
$159.3 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2010, our
capital commitments increased by $95.0 million due to the
acquisition of two additional VLOCs. We intend to partially
finance our capital requirements with external bank financing,
equity offerings and cash from operations.
D-64
Our practice has been to acquire drybulk and tanker carriers
using a combination of funds received from equity investors and
bank debt secured by mortgages on our vessels. Our business is
capital intensive and its future success will depend on our
ability to maintain a high-quality fleet through the acquisition
of newer vessels and the selective sale of older vessels. These
acquisitions will be principally subject to managements
expectation of future market conditions as well as our ability
to acquire drybulk carriers or tankers on favorable terms.
Long
Term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements:
On September 18, 2007, the Company entered into a loan
agreement with Nordea Bank Norge ASA, for a $325 million
senior secured credit facility, or the Nordea credit facility,
for the purpose of refinancing the existing term loan facility
with Fortis Bank of $118 million and financing the
acquisition of additional vessels. The Company and Nordea
completed the syndication of the Nordea credit facility on
February 12, 2008 which resulted in certain amendments to
repayment terms and financial covenants, increased interest
margins and commitment fees on the undrawn portion of the Nordea
credit facility.
The amended syndicated Nordea credit facility is comprised of
the following two Tranches and bears interest at LIBOR plus a
margin:
Tranche A is a reducing revolving credit facility in a
maximum amount of $200 million of which the Company
utilized $199 million to repay the outstanding balance of
the credit facility with Fortis of $118 million, to
partially finance the acquisition of vessels and for working
capital purposes. As of December 31, 2010, following the
mandatory prepayment of $24.7 million, due to the sale of
M/V Augusta,
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton
the balance of Tranche A of $110.5 million will be
reduced or repaid in nine semi-annual equal installments in the
amount of $8.75 million each and a balloon installment in
an amount of $31.75 million.
Tranche B is a term loan facility in a maximum amount of
$125 million which was fully utilized to partially finance
the acquisition of vessels. As of December 31, 2010,
following the mandatory prepayment of $11.6 million due to
the sale of
M/V Augusta,
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton,
the balance of Tranche B of $58.5 million is repayable
in one installment of $6.8 million followed by nine equal
consecutive semi-annual installments in the amount of
$5.5 million each and a balloon installment in the amount
of $2.2 million. As of the December 31, 2010, we were
in compliance with the loan covenants.
The Nordea credit facility is secured with first priority
mortgages over the vessels, first priority assignment of
vessels insurances and earnings, specific assignment of
the time charters, first priority pledges over the operating and
retention accounts, corporate guarantee and pledge of shares.
The Company is required to pay a commitment fee of 0.45% per
annum payable quarterly in arrears on the un-drawn portion of
the Nordea credit facility.
The loan agreement includes among other covenants, financial
covenants requiring (i) the ratio of funded debt to the sum
of funded debt plus shareholders equity not to be greater
than 0.70 to 1.00; (ii) effective July 1, 2008, the
liquidity must not be less than $0.5 million multiplied by
the number of vessels owned (iii) effective
December 31, 2007, the ratio of EBITDA to net interest
expense at each quarter end must not be less than 2.50 to 1;
(iv) the aggregate fair market value of the vessels must
not be less than 100% of the aggregate outstanding balance under
the loan plus any unutilized commitment under Tranche A. As
of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with above
mentioned covenants.
On December 23, 2008, we entered into a loan agreement with
DVB Bank SE for a new secured term loan facility for an amount
of $29.56 million, which was fully drawn on
January 14, 2009 (see Note 7 to our consolidated
financial statements). We used $25 million of the proceeds
of the loan to make the prepayment in the amount of
$25.0 million under its amendatory agreement to the Nordea
credit facility described below. On May 4, 2010, the
M/T Tigani
was sold and as provided in the loan agreement a mandatory
prepayment of the loan of $8.6 million was made, which
reduced the outstanding loan balance. The balance of the loan at
December 31, 2010 of $4.4 million was fully repaid
following the sale of
M/T Tamara
in 2011.
As provided in the Nordea credit facility, in the case of a sale
of a vessel, the Company has the option of either using the sale
proceeds for the prepayment of the loan or depositing such
proceeds in an escrow account pledged in favor of Nordea and
using the funds to finance the purchase of a new vessel of the
same type or better within 90 days.
D-65
The Company made use of this option and used the sale proceeds
of the
M/V Pierre,
M/V Lansing
M/V Richmond
and
M/V Juneau
to partially finance the acquisition of
M/V Partagas,
M/V Robusto,
M/V Cohiba
and
M/V Montecristo
respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, we were in full compliance with
our Nordea loan covenants.
On February 24, 2011, the Company accepted a commitment
letter from a major Chinese bank for the financing of up to 60%
of the aggregate contract cost of the three VLOCs discussed
above.
Cash
Flows
Cash and cash equivalent are primarily held in U.S. dollars.
The following table presents cash flow information for the year
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010. The information was
derived from the audited consolidated statements of cash flows
of OceanFreight and is expressed in thousands of
U.S. Dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
81,369
|
|
|
$
|
26,552
|
|
|
$
|
28,449
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(120,665
|
)
|
|
|
(130,786
|
)
|
|
|
(42,678
|
)
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
43,321
|
|
|
|
118,437
|
|
|
|
(13,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
14,203
|
|
|
|
(27,723
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
23,069
|
|
|
|
37,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$
|
23,069
|
|
|
$
|
37,272
|
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 increased by
$1.9 million or 7.1% as compared to 2009, due to the
decrease in operating losses. Net cash provided by operating
activities in 2009 decreased by $54.8 million or 67.4% due
to the decrease in our vessels revenue and the scheduled
drydocking of four vessels as compared to one in 2008.
Net cash
used in investing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities in 2010 was
$42.7 million, which represents $46.6 million paid in
connection with the vessels under construction,
$40.2 million paid for the acquisition of
M/V Montecristo
and $44.1 million of net proceeds collected from the
sale of
M/V Pierre,
M/T Tigani
and
M/T Pink
Sands. Net cash used in investing activities in 2009 was
$130.8 million, which represents $9.9 million of
initial deposits made in connection with the acquisition of
M/V Montecristo,
$180.5 million paid for the acquisition of
M/V Robusto,
M/V Cohiba
and
M/V Partagas,
$0.8 million paid for the acquisition of two automobiles
used for corporate purposes and $60.4 million proceeds from
the sale of
M/V Lansing,
M/V Juneau
and
M/V Richmond.
Net cash
provided by/(used in) financing activities:
Net cash used in financing activities in 2010 was
$13.5 million and consists of (a) $39.2 million
of net proceeds from our SEDA equity offering and capital
contribution from Basset, (b) $41.5 million of
repayment of long-term debt, (c) $14.4 million of
prepayment of long term debt due to the sale of
M/T Tigani
and
M/T Pink
Sands, (d) $3.5 million representing decrease in
restricted cash required under our loan agreements and
(e) $0.3 million of financing costs.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2009 was
$118.4 million and consists of (a) $188.3 million
of net proceeds from our SEPA and SEDA equity offerings,
(b) $29.6 million of proceeds drawn under our secured
long-term debt, (c) $71.9 million of repayment of long
term debt, (d) $25 million of repayment of
sellers credit and (e) $2.5 million representing
restricted cash required under our loan agreements.
D-66
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2008 was
$43.3 million and consists of (a) $50.9 million
of net proceeds from our controlled equity offering,
(b) $63.4 million of proceeds drawn under our
long-term debt, (c) $16.0 million of repayment of long
term debt, (d) $47.8 million of dividends paid,
(e) $6.5 million representing restricted cash required
under our loan agreements and (f) $0.7 million in
financing fees paid in connection with our DVB loan.
Adjusted
EBITDA:
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and excludes loss on sale of
vessels and impairment charges on vessels. Adjusted EBITDA does
not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to
net income or cash flow from operations, as determined by
U.S. GAAP and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be
comparable to that reported by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA
is included in this Annual Report because it is a basis upon
which we assess our liquidity position, because it is used by
our lenders as a measure of our compliance with certain loan
covenants and because we believe that Adjusted EBITDA presents
useful information to investors regarding our ability to service
and/or incur
indebtedness.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures and have
limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for analysis of OceanFreights
results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these
limitations are: (i) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not
reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital
needs, and (ii) although depreciation and amortization are
non-cash charges, the assets that are depreciated and amortized
may need to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirement for such capital
expenditures. Because of these limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA should not be considered as a principal indicator of
OceanFreights performance.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating
activities to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
81,369
|
|
|
$
|
26,552
|
|
|
$
|
28,449
|
|
Net increase in current and non-current assets
|
|
|
4,881
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
Net increase in current liabilities, excluding current portion
of long term debt
|
|
|
(5,865
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
Net Interest expense(1)
|
|
|
16,789
|
|
|
|
19,563
|
|
|
|
14,816
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest
expense
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
96,699
|
|
|
$
|
55,502
|
|
|
$
|
41,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net Interest expense includes the realized interest on Interest
Rate Swaps. |
Working
Capital Position
On December 31, 2010, our current assets totaled
$109.8 million while current liabilities totaled
$111.3 million, resulting in a negative working capital
position of $1.5 million. We believe we will generate
sufficient cash during 2011 to make the required principal and
interest payment on our indebtedness and provide for our normal
working capital requirements and remain in a positive cash
position in 2011. Furthermore, as explained under Item 4.A
in this report we have secured external financing that will
enable us to meet our predelivery commitments under the
shipbuilding contracts of the three VLOCs. Item 4.A. also
describes the shipbuilding contracts for the additional two
VLOCs which we agreed to acquire in April 2011 but we have not
yet secured financing to satisfy the remaining payments. The
total outstanding yard payments amount to $95.0 million, of
which $29.7 million is payable in 2012 and the balance is
payable in 2013. We expect that for these two VLOCs and for any
additional vessels that we acquire, we will rely on new debt,
proceeds from future offerings and revenues from our operations
to meet our liquidity needs going forward.
D-67
Interest
Rate Risk:
We are subject to market risks relating to changes in interest
rates, because of our floating rate debt outstanding. During
2007, we paid interest on our debt based on LIBOR plus a margin.
On January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest rate swap
agreements to partially hedge our exposure to variability in
LIBOR rates. Under the terms of our loan agreement, we have
fixed our interest rate at 6.05% inclusive of margin.
The table below provides information about our long-term debt
and derivative financial instruments and other financial
instruments at December 31, 2010 that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates. See notes 7 and 10 to our
consolidated financial statements, which provide additional
information with respect to our existing debt agreements and
derivative financial instruments. For debt obligations, the
table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average
interest rates by expected maturity dates. For derivative
financial instruments, the table presents average notional
amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected maturity
dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual
payments to be exchanged under the contracts. Weighted average
interest rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield
curve at the reporting date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Onwards
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment amount
|
|
|
65,991
|
|
|
|
28,528
|
|
|
|
110,847
|
|
Variable interest rate
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap notional amount(2)
|
|
|
214,932
|
|
|
|
179,053
|
|
|
|
157,651
|
|
Average pay rate(2)
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
Average receive rate(2)
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for a
description of our Nordea credit facility. |
|
(2) |
|
On January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest rate swap
agreements with Nordea Bank Norge ASA, our lending bank, to
partially hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates
on an aggregate notional amount of $316.5 million,
decreasing in accordance with the debt repayments, by converting
the variable rate of our debt to fixed rate for a period for
five years, effective April 1, 2008. Under the terms of the
interest rate swap agreements, the Company and the bank agreed
to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between
paying a fixed rate at 3.55% and a floating rate interest amount
calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts and
maturities. These instruments have not been designated as cash
flow hedges, under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and
consequently, the changes in fair value of these instruments are
recorded through earnings. The swap agreements expire in April
2013. |
|
|
C.
|
Research
and development, patents and licenses
|
We incur from time to time expenditures relating to inspections
for acquiring vessels that meet our standards. Such expenditures
are insignificant and they are expensed as they incur.
Please see The International Drybulk Industry and
The International Tanker Industry sections in
Item 4.B.
|
|
E.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements:
|
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
D-68
|
|
F.
|
Tabular
Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and
their maturity dates as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
One to
|
|
|
Three to
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Long term debt(1)
|
|
|
70,397
|
|
|
|
57,056
|
|
|
|
82,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,772
|
|
Vessels under construction
|
|
|
40,860
|
|
|
|
118,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,300
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
|
|
11,923
|
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,048
|
|
Office Lease(2)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
115,897
|
|
|
|
187,451
|
|
|
|
91,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As further discussed in our December 31, 2010 consolidated
financial statements the outstanding balance of our long-term
debt at December 31, 2010, was $209.8 million. The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. Estimated interest
payments are not included in the table above. See
Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Long-Term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements and
Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
As further explained in our December 31, 2010 consolidated
financial statements, the two lease agreements we had for our
office facilities in Athens expired on December 31, 2010.
On January 1, 2011 we entered into a new lease agreement
for the current office space leased from a family member of
Mr. George Economou, which terminates on December 31,
2015. |
See Forward-Looking Statements at the beginning of
this annual report.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Directors,
Senior Management and Employees
|
|
|
A.
|
Directors
and Senior Management
|
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of our
directors, executive officers and key employees. Our Board of
Directors is elected annually on a staggered basis, and each
director elected holds office until his successor shall have
been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of his
death, resignation, removal or the earlier termination of his
term of office. Officers are elected from time to time by vote
of our Board of Directors and hold office until a successor is
elected. Antonis Kandylidis is the son of Konstandinos
Kandylidis. There are no Directors service contracts with
the Company or any if its subsidiaries providing for benefits
upon termination of employment.
On June 10, 2010, at the Annual General Meeting of the
Shareholders, Mr. George Biniaris was elected to serve as
Director of the Company for a term of three years. On
June 10, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
designated Mr. George Biniaris as the Chairman of the Audit
Committee and determined that he qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert as defined under Commission rules.
Mr. George Biniaris replaced Mr. Stephen Souras, whose
term expired and who did not stand for re-election at the Annual
General Meeting of the Shareholders.
D-69
In December 2010, our Chief Accounting Officer
Mrs. Konstandia Papaefthymiou submitted her resignation for
personal reasons and effective February 1, 2011, her duties
were temporarily assumed by our Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Antonis Kandylidis
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Class B Director
|
Demetris Nenes
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
President Chief Operating Officer
|
Solon Dracoulis
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
Konstandia Papaefthymiou
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
Professor John Liveris
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Chairman and Class A Director
|
Konstandinos Kandylidis
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Class C Director
|
Panagiotis Korakas
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Class B Director
|
George Biniaris
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Class C Director
|
Antonis Kandylidis has served as our Chief Executive
Officer since December 2007, has served as a member of our Board
of Directors since September 2007 and served as our Interim
Chief Financial Officer from April 2008 to January 2010.
Mr. A. Kandylidis started his career at OMI
Corporations commercial department. During his tenure at
OMI Corporation he gained significant experience in the tanker
vessel business and held various positions with responsibilities
spanning Sale and Purchase, Time Charters, FFA Trading,
Corporate Finance and Strategic Planning. In the spring of 2006,
he returned to Greece where he provided consultancy services to
companies affiliated with ship-owner Mr. George Economou.
In September of 2006, Mr. Kandylidis founded OceanFreight
Inc. and in April of 2007 he took the Company public.
Mr. Kandylidis graduated Magna Cum Laude from Brown
University and continued his studies at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology where he graduated with a Masters degree
of Science in Ocean Systems Management.
Demetris Nenes was appointed Vice President
Business Development on February 8, 2009 following the
resignation of Mr. M. Gregos who had served as our Chief
Operating Officer since January 2008. Effective January 2010,
Mr. D Nenes was appointed President and Chief Operating
Officer. Mr. D. Nenes began his professional career working
at Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation as a Design Engineer working in
various positions, with the most significant being Head of the
Transmission Design Team for the Navy version of the S92.
Mr. Nenes began his shipping career in 2005, joining OMI
Corporations Vetting / Safety &
Quality department. During his career at OMI he moved in the
commercial side of the business being involved in Forward
Freight Agreements (FFA) Trading and Sales and Purchase. After
the sale of OMI to Teekay Shipping and Torm, Mr. Nenes
joined Ospraie Management LLC. Ospraie is a commodity hedge fund
based in New York. At Ospraie Mr. Nenes was involved in
both FFA trading and Market Research and Intelligence.
Mr. Nenes holds a diploma in Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering from the National Technical University of Athens and
a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the
University of Connecticut.
Solon Dracoulis has served as our Treasurer since April
2007 and had served as our Chief Accounting Officer from April
2007 until his promotion to Chief Financial Officer effective
January 2010. During 2006 and 2007, Mr. Dracoulis was a
consultant to Navios Maritime Holdings and assumed the
responsibilities of financial reporting and filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Prior to that period he held
the position of Chief Financial Officer of Stelmar Shipping,
Inc. following the acquisition of the company by Overseas
Shipholding Group in early 2005 and as a Financial Controller
Budget and Reporting Officer since 2001. During that time he was
responsible for the preparation of Stelmars financial
statements, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the implementation of accounting procedures and controls
administration of the financial and accounting management and
information system, preparation of annual operating budgets,
quarterly projections and monthly cash flow statements. During
the period starting in 1980. Mr. Dracoulis worked for
Arthur Andersen & CO., KPMG and
PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he commenced his career as an
auditor analyst and later became a Principal in the
shipping audit division where he conducted financial audits in
accordance with International Standards on Auditing (I.S.A.) and
U.S. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (G.A.A.S),
evaluation of internal controls and internal audit procedures.
He has a degree in Accounting and Business Administration from
the Business Administration and Commercial Studies branch of the
University of Athens and is a
D-70
member of the Association of Certified Accountants and Auditors
of Greece. He is also a graduate of the Merchant Marine Academy
at Aspropyrgos and has a five year service at sea as a Radio
Officer.
Konstandinos Kandylidis has served as a member of our
Board of Directors since April 2007. He is the main shareholder
and Managing Director of Lapapharm Trade &
Distribution Company Inc. (Lapapharm), a private
business operating since 1962 in the fields of pharmaceuticals,
crop protection and veterinary products, representing in Greece,
mainly U.S. multinational corporations in the field
including Gilead Sciences, Pharmion and Fort Dodge among
others and in the past the American Cyanamid Company until 1994.
Mr. Kandylidis joined Lapapharm in 1975 and served in
several positions until 1990, when he became a member of the
Board of Directors and in 1996 when he became the Managing
Director. He was also member of the Board of Directors for the
Hellenic Association of Crop Protection Products and has served
as a member in several committees for the Hellenic Association
of Pharmaceutical Companies. Mr. Kandylidis is a graduate
of the Athens University of Economics and Business and he has a
certificate in Marketing from the College for the Distributive
Trades in England.
Panagiotis A. Korakas was appointed to our Board of
Directors in December 2008 following the resignation of
Mr. H. Kerames in November 2008. He was born in 1950 in
Athens, Greece. Mr. Korakas has had an extensive career in
the construction and construction materials industry, both as an
executive and an entrepreneur. For almost ten years,
Mr. Korakas was the General Manager of Korakas &
Partners, a commercial construction entity, while during the
last 15 years he has run a business enterprise specializing
in advanced composite metal construction.
Professor John Liveris has served as a member of our
Board of Directors since April 2007, has served as our Chairman
since December 2007 and is a consultant in the technology and
defense industries based in Athens, Greece. His most recent
affiliations include Contour Global LLC, Scientific Games
Corporation, Hellenic Telecommunications Organization (OTE),
Motorola, EADS Eurofighter, the Monitor Company and Northrop
Grumman Corporation. Prior to his current activities, Professor
Liveris was, until 1999, the Group Senior Advisor at Intracom,
the leading Greek telecommunications and electronics
manufacturer where he was responsible for developing thrusts
into new markets, including the establishment of a Defense
division, and new technologies, for revamping Intracoms
image and for all relations with the multi-lateral funding
institutions. Mr. Liveris studied Mechanical Engineering at
Tufts University in Boston, Mass. He did his graduate and
doctoral studies in Engineering Management at the George
Washington University in Washington, DC. There he taught from
1979 to 1996, attaining Professorial rank. Prof. Liveris has had
a twenty-year professional experience in Washington, DC in
various Greek government and private sector managerial and
consulting positions. He has also had an extensive career as a
journalist.
George Biniaris has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since June 2010. He served as Chief Financial Officer
of Lapapharm, a private equity business, from 1995 until his
retirement in 2010. Prior to this, he served as Chief Accountant
of Lapapharm from 1990 to 1995, having initially joined
Lapapharm, as an assistant to the Chief Accountant in 1986.
Mr. Biniaris started his career working at the Greek
Ministry of Agriculture and later worked for a law firm in the
division of mergers and acquisitions. Prior to this, he
graduated from the Athens University for Economics and Business
in 1983.
Stephen Souras has served as a member of our Board of
Directors from April 2007 until June 2010 when his term expired.
He is also a director of Investment Yard Management Limited, a
Cayman Islands investment manager, overseeing a portfolio of
alternative investments. Prior to employment at Investment Yard
Management Limited Mr. Souras worked at Goldman Sachs
International in the Investment Management Division advising and
managing the portfolios of high net worth clients. Prior to
Goldman Sachs, Mr. Souras started his career in business
development for a consumer goods company in Asia.
Mr. Souras was also employed at UBS Warburg in equity sales
and then research where he advised institutional investors.
Mr. Souras is a graduate of Imperial College in London,
where he obtained a Bachelor of Engineering degree in
Information Systems Engineering in 1992 and M.Sc. with
Distinction, in Applications of Electronics in Medicine in 1993.
He also holds a MBA from INSEAD in Fontainebleau, France.
Konstandia Papaefthymiou has served as our Chief
Accountant since June 2007 and as our Chief Accounting Officer
since January 2010 and until January 2011 when she submitted her
resignation. For the period from 2005 to 2007,
Ms. Papaefthymiou was the chief accountant of Navios
Maritime Holdings. Ms. Papaefthymiou has a long experience
in the shipping industry and has served as Chief Accountant and
Financial Controller in Private and
D-71
Public shipping companies since 1992. During the last five
years, Ms. Papaefthymiou has been involved in various
projects including M&A transactions, the designing and
implementation of corporate internal controls and setup of IT
integrated infrastructure for Shipping Companies. She holds a
Bachelor Degree from the Law School of the University of Athens,
Political and Economic Studies. She also holds an MBA in
shipping from ALBA Business School.
We paid an aggregate amount of $3.8 million and
$3.9 million as annual compensation and cash bonus to our
chief executive director officer for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Non-executive
directors and officers other than our Chief Executive Officer
received annual compensation and cash bonus in the aggregate
amount of $1.2 million and $1.6 million for fiscal
years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, plus reimbursement of their
out-of-pocket
expenses. We do not have a retirement plan for our officers or
directors.
On December 24, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
approved the amendment of the consultancy agreement for the
services to the Company of the Chief Executive Officer and
increased the annual base consulting fee from $0.66 million
(Euro 0.5 million) to $0.93 million (Euro
0.7 million) with effect January 1, 2009. All other
terms of the consultancy agreement remained unchanged. The
duration of the agreement will be for five years beginning
January 1, 2009, and ending, unless terminated earlier on
the basis of any other provision as may be defined in the
agreement, on the day before the fifth anniversary of such date.
In addition, 80,000 subordinated shares were issued to our Chief
Executive Officer and 5,150 common shares were issued to our
former Chief Operating Officer. The aggregate of 696,050
(2,085,150 before the reverse stock split effect) subordinated
shares were converted into common shares on August 15, 2008
following the satisfaction of conditions contained in our
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.
Pursuant to the Companys 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
described below, in January 2010, an aggregate of 1,066,667
(3,200,000 before the reverse stock split) common shares were
awarded to the Companys directors and officers. In
December 2010, 6,000,000 common shares were awarded to Steel
Wheel Investments Limited, a company controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer. These shares vest
ratably over a three year period commencing on the date of
issuance.
Equity
Incentive Plan
2010
Equity Incentive Plan
In January 2010, we adopted an equity incentive plan which we
refer to as the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Plan, under
which officers, key employees, directors and consultants of us
and our subsidiaries will be eligible to receive options to
acquire common shares, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, dividend participation rights and other stock-based or
stock-denominated awards. We have reserved a total of 10,000,000
(30,000,000 before the reverse stock split) common shares for
issuance under the Plan, subject to adjustment for changes in
capitalization as provided in the Plan. The Plan will be
administered by our Compensation Committee, or such other
committee of our Board of Directors as may be designated by the
board to administer the Plan.
Under the terms of the Plan, stock options and stock
appreciation rights granted under the Plan will have an exercise
price per common share equal to the fair market value of a
common share on the date of grant, unless otherwise determined
by the Plan administrator, but in no event will the exercise
price be less than the fair market value of a common share on
the date of grant. Options and stock appreciation rights will be
exercisable at times and under conditions as determined by the
Plan administrator, but in no event will they be exercisable
later than ten years from the date of grant.
The Plan administrator may grant shares of restricted stock and
awards of restricted stock units subject to vesting and
forfeiture provisions and other terms and conditions as
determined by the Plan administrator. Upon the vesting of a
restricted stock unit, the award recipient will be paid an
amount equal to the number of restricted stock units that then
vest multiplied by the fair market value of a common share on
the date of vesting, which payment
D-72
may be paid in the form of cash or common shares or a
combination of both, as determined by the Plan administrator.
The Plan administrator may grant dividend equivalents with
respect to grants of restricted stock units.
Adjustments may be made to outstanding awards in the event of a
corporate transaction or change in capitalization or other
extraordinary event. In the event of a change in
control (as defined in the Plan), unless otherwise
provided by the Plan administrator in an award agreement, awards
then outstanding will become fully vested and exercisable in
full.
Our Board of Directors may amend or terminate the Plan and may
amend outstanding awards, provided that no such amendment or
termination may be made that would materially impair any rights,
or materially increase any obligations, of a grantee under an
outstanding award. Shareholder approval of Plan amendments will
be required under certain circumstances. Unless terminated
earlier by our Board of Directors, the Plan will expire ten
years from the date the Plan was adopted.
On January 18, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved in all respect the resolutions of the
meetings of the Compensation Committee held on January 15,
2010, pursuant to which 1,000,000 (3,000,000 before the reverse
stock split) common shares were awarded to Steel Wheel
Investments Limited, a company controlled by our Chief Executive
Officer, and an aggregate of 66,667 (200,000 before the reverse
stock split) common shares were awarded to the Companys
Directors and officers. On December 17, 2010,
Companys Board of Directors adopted and approved in all
respect the resolutions of the meetings of the Compensation
Committee held on December 17, 2010, pursuant to which
6,000,000 common shares were awarded to Steel Wheel Investments
Limited.
Our Board of Directors is elected annually on a staggered basis,
and each director elected holds office for a three year term or
until his successor shall have been duly elected and qualified,
except in the event of his death, resignation, removal or the
earlier termination of his term of office. The current term of
office of each director is as follows: our Class A
directors will serve for a term expiring at the 2011 annual
meeting of shareholders, our Class B directors will serve
for a term expiring at the 2012 annual meeting, and our
Class C directors will serve for a term expiring at the
2013 annual meeting.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
We have established an audit committee comprised of three
independent members of our Board of Directors who are
responsible for reviewing our accounting controls and
recommending to the Board of Directors the engagement of our
outside auditors. Our audit committee is responsible for
reviewing all related party transactions for potential conflicts
of interest and all related party transactions are subject to
the approval of the audit committee. We have established a
compensation committee comprised of independent directors which
is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors our
senior executive officers compensation and benefits. We
have also established a nominating and corporate governance
committee which is responsible for recommending to the Board of
Directors nominees for director and directors for appointment to
board committees and advising the board with regard to corporate
governance practices. Shareholders may also nominate directors
in accordance with procedures set forth in our bylaws. The
members of the audit, compensation and nominating committees are
Mr. G. Biniaris, who also serves as the chairman of our
audit and compensation committees, Mr. Liveris who also
acts as the chairman of our Board of Directors and corporate
governance committee, and Mr. P. Korakas. Our Board of
Directors has determined that Mr. G. Biniaris qualifies as
financial expert under the Commissions rules.
As of December 31, 2010 the Company employed six persons,
namely Antonis Kandylidis, our Chief Executive Officer, Demetris
Nenes, our President and Chief Operating Officer, Solon
Dracoulis, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Konstandia
Papaefthymiou, our Chief Accounting Officer and two other
employees, all of whom are located in Athens. Effective
February 1, 2011, the duties of our Chief Accounting
Officer were temporarily assumed by our Chief Financial Officer
following the resignation of Ms. Papaefthymiou.
D-73
The shares beneficially owned by our directors and officers
and/or
companies affiliated with these individuals are disclosed in
Item 7A Major Shareholders below.
|
|
Item 7.
|
Major
Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
The following table sets forth current information regarding
(i) the owners of more than five percent of our voting
securities of which we are aware, of which there were none as of
the date of this Annual Report; and (ii) the total amount
of common shares owned by all of our officers and directors,
individually and as a group. All of our shareholders are
entitled to one vote for each share held.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Identity of Person or Group
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01
|
|
Antonis Kandylidis(1)
|
|
|
60,017,141
|
(1)
|
|
|
50.5
|
%
|
|
|
All other Directors and officers as a group
|
|
|
118,481
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Antonis Kandylidis may be deemed to beneficially own
(a) 17,333,333 of these common shares through Basset
Holdings Inc., a company of which he is the controlling person,
(b) 7,026,666 of these common shares through Steel Wheel
Investments Ltd., a company of which he is the controlling
person and (c) 35,657,142 of these common shares through
Haywood Finance Limited, a company of which he is the
controlling person. |
|
* |
|
Less than 1% of our issued and outstanding common stock. |
|
|
B.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Registration
Rights Agreement
On September 3, 2008, we filed a resale shelf registration
statement on
Form F-3
to register 695,050 (2,085,150 before the reverse stock split)
common shares on behalf of Basset Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel
Investments Ltd. and Seabert Shipping Co., a company controlled
by our former Chief Operating Officer. This resale shelf
registration statement was amended on October 30, 2009 and
has not yet been declared effective.
Cardiff
Marine Inc. (Cardiff)
Until June 15, 2010, we used the services of Cardiff, a
ship management company with offices in Greece, for the
technical and commercial management of the Companys fleet.
The issued and outstanding capital stock of Cardiff is
beneficially owned (a) 30% by a company the beneficial
owner of which is Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis, the mother of
the Companys CEO and (b) 70% by a foundation
controlled by Mr. George Economou. Mrs. C Kandylidis
is the sister of Mr. G Economou and the wife of one of the
Companys directors, Mr. Konstandinos Kandylidis.
Prior to June 15, 2010, Cardiff was engaged under separate
vessel management agreements directly by the Companys
respective wholly owned vessel owning subsidiaries. Under the
vessel management agreements Cardiff was entitled to a daily
management fee per vessel of 764 ($1,013) and 870
($1.153) for the drybulk carriers and tanker vessels,
respectively. Cardiff also provided, other services pursuant to
a services agreement, which was terminated on June 15,
2010, under which the Company paid additional fees, including
(1) a financing fee of 0.2% of the amount of any loan,
credit facility, interest rate swap agreement, foreign currency
contract and forward exchange contract arranged by Cardiff,
(2) a commission of 1% of the purchase price on sales or
purchases of vessels in the Companys fleet that are
arranged by Cardiff, (3) a commission of 1.25% of
charterhire agreements arranged by Cardiff, (4) an
information technology fee of 26,363 ($34,939) per quarter
and (5) a fee of 527 ($698) per day for
superintendent inspection services in connection with the
possible purchase of a vessel. The U.S. dollar exchange
figures above are based on the exchange rate at
December 31, 2010. At the beginning of each calendar year,
these fees were adjusted upwards according to the Greek consumer
price index. We were also reimbursed Cardiff for any
out-of-pocket
expenses at cost plus 10%.
D-74
In May 2009, we entered into a service agreement with Cardiff
whereby Cardiff is entitled to a 0.15% brokerage commission on
the Companys FFA trading transactions. The agreement was
terminated on June 15, 2010.
Until July 2009, when Cardiff assumed the management of all of
our vessels, it was providing supervisory services for the
vessels whose technical manager at the time was Wallem Ship
Management Ltd. in exchange for a daily fee of 105 ($140
based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2010) per
vessel.
Furthermore, based on the management agreements with Cardiff we,
as of June 15, 2010, had made a security payment of $6,486,
representing managed vessels estimated operating expenses
and management fees for three months. Following the termination
of the agreements on June 15, 2010, the security payment
was reimbursed to us in September 2010.
The fees charged by Cardiff for 2008, 2009 and 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of Charge
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
Management fees
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
4,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,275
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Commission on charterhire agreements
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
Voyage expenses Statement of Operations
|
Commission on FFA trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Gain on forward freight agreements Statement of
Operations
|
Commission on vessels under construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Vessels under construction Balance Sheet
|
Commissions on purchase of vessels
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, net Balance Sheet
|
Commissions on sale of vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels Statement of Operations
|
Financing fees
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs Statement of Operations
|
IT related fees
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fixed assets, net Balance Sheet
|
IT related fees
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Financing fees
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing fees, net Balance Sheet
|
Legal Attendance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Mark up on reimbursement of out of pocket expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
At December 31, 2009 and 2010, $0.79 million and $nil
million, respectively, are payable to Cardiff, and are reflected
in the consolidated balance sheets as Due to related
parties. In addition, $0.34 million due from and
$0.3 million due to Cardiff as at December 31, 2009
and 2010, respectively, relating to the operations of the
vessels under Cardiffs management, are included in
Prepayments and other and Accounts
Payable in the consolidated balance sheets.
TMS
Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd.
Following termination of the management agreements with Cardiff
discussed above, effective June 15, 2010, we contracted the
technical and commercial management of our drybulk and tanker
fleet as well as the supervision of the construction of the
newbuildings to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd., respectively,
which we refer to as our Fleet Managers. Both companies are
beneficially owned by (a) 30% by a company the beneficial
owner of which is Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis, the mother of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and (b) 70% by a
D-75
foundation controlled by Mr. George Economou. Mrs. C.
Kandylidis is also the sister of Mr. G. Economou and the
wife of one of the Companys directors,
Mr. Konstandinos Kandylidis
The Fleet Managers are engaged under separate vessel management
agreements directly by the Companys respective
wholly-owned vessel owning subsidiaries. Under the vessel
management agreements we pay a daily management fee per vessel,
which includes budgeted superintendents fees per vessel
plus expenses for any services performed relating to evaluation
of the vessels physical condition, supervision of
shipboard activities or attendance upon repairs and drydockings.
At the beginning of each calendar year, these fees are adjusted
upwards according to the Greek consumer price index. Such
increase cannot be less than 3% and more than 5%. In the event
that the management agreement is terminated for any reason other
than Fleet Managers default, we will be required
(a) to pay management fees for a further period of three
(3) calendar months as from the date of termination and
(b) to pay an equitable proportion of any severance crew
costs which materialize as per applicable the Collective
Bargaining Agreement (CBA). In this respect, we will have to pay
approximately $942 due to the expected sale of the
M/T Olinda,
M/T Tamara,
M/V Augusta,
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton.
The Fleet Managers are also entitled to a daily management fee
per vessel of 1,500 ($1,988 based on the exchange rate of
December 31, 2010 and 1,700 ($2,253 based on the
exchange rate of December 31, 2010) for the drybulk
carriers and tanker vessels, respectively. The Fleet Managers
are also entitled to (a) a discretionary incentive fee,
(b) extra superintendents fee of 500 ($663
based on the exchange rate of December 31, 2010) per
day (c) a commission of 1.25% on charterhire agreements
that are arranged by the Fleet Managers and (d) a
commission of 1% of the purchase price on sales or purchases of
vessels in our fleet that are arranged by the Fleet Managers.
Furthermore, the Fleet Managers are entitled to a supervision
fee payable upfront for vessels under construction equal to 10%
of the approved annual budget for supervision cost.
Furthermore, based on the management agreements, as of
December 31, 2010, we made a security payment of
$4.1 million to TMS Dry Ltd, representing managed
vessels estimated operating expenses and management fees
for three months which will be settled when the agreements
terminate; however, in case of a change of control the amount of
the security is not refundable. The amounts have been classified
under Other non-current assets in the accompanying
2010 consolidated balance sheet.
The fees charged by TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. during the
period from June 15, 2010 to December 31, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TMS
|
|
TMS
|
|
|
Nature of Charge
|
|
Dry LTD
|
|
Tankers Ltd
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
Management fees
|
|
$
|
3,496
|
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Commission on charterhire agreements
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
Voyage expenses Statement of Operations
|
Commissions on acquisition of vessels
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, net Balance Sheet
|
Commissions on sale of vessels
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels Statement of Operations
|
Termination fees
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels Statement of Operations
|
Supervision fee on vessels under construction
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fixed assets, net Balance Sheet
|
At December 31, 2010, $1.4 million and
$0.4 million is payable to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers
Ltd., respectively, and are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as Due to related
parties. In addition, $1.1 million and
$2.0 million due from TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. as
at December 31, 2010, respectively, relating to the
security payment as discussed above and the operations of the
vessels under TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. management are
included in Prepayments and other in the
accompanying 2010 consolidated balance sheet.
D-76
Vivid
Finance Limited (Vivid)
On August 13, 2010, we entered into a consultancy agreement
(the Agreement) with Vivid, a related company
organized under the laws of Cyprus, which is controlled by
Mr. George Economou and of which he may be deemed the
beneficial owner. Vivid serves as our financial consultant on
matters related to (i) new loans and credit facilities with
lenders and financial institutions, (ii) the raising of
equity or debt from capital markets, (iii) interest rate
swaps agreements, foreign currency contracts and forward
exchange contracts and (iv) the renegotiation of existing
loans and credit facilities. In consideration of these services
we will pay Vivid a fee of 0.20% on the total transaction amount.
The agreement has a duration of five years and may be terminated
(i) at the end of its term unless extended by mutual
agreement of the parties; (ii) at any time by the mutual
agreement of the parties; and (iii) by the Company after
providing written notice to Vivid at least 30 days prior to
the actual termination date. As defined in the Agreement, in the
event of a Change of Control Vivid has the option to
terminate the Agreement and cease providing the aforementioned
service within three months from the Change of Control.
Vivid did not provide any services in 2010 and, accordingly, no
fees were billed to the Company.
Transbulk
1904 AB (Transbulk)
The vessel
M/V Richmond
was employed on a time charter with Transbulk for a period
of 24 to 28 months at gross charter rate of $29,100 per
day. On August 1, 2009, the vessel was redelivered to the
Company due to early termination of the charter party at the
charterers request. The vessel
M/V Lansing
was employed under a time charter with Transbulk until
June 29, 2009 (the vessel was sold on July 1,
2009) at a gross charterhire of $24,000 per day. Transbulk
is a company based in Gothenburg, Sweden. Transbulk has been in
the drybulk cargo chartering business for a period of
approximately 30 years. Mr. George Economou serves on
its Board of Directors.
Heidmar
Trading LLC
On October 14, 2008, the
M/T Tigani
commenced her time charter employment with Heidmar Trading
LLC, for a period of approximately one year at a gross daily
rate of $29,800, the vessel was redelivered to the Company in
December 2009. Mr. George Economou is the chairman of the
Board of Directors of the company and the Companys Chief
Executive Officer is a member of its Board of Directors. The
vessel was redelivered on December 22, 2009.
Tri-Ocean
Heidmar Tankers LLC
On October 17, 2008, the
M/T Tamara,
concurrently with her delivery commenced her time charter
employment with Tri-Ocean Heidmar Tankers LLC for a period of
approximately 25 to 29 months at a gross daily rate of $27.
Tri-Ocean Heidmar Tankers LLC is owned by Heidmar Inc.
Mr. George Economou is the chairman of the Board of
Directors of Heidmar Inc. and our Chief Executive Officer is a
member of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. The vessel was
redelivered on November 6, 2010. At December 31, 2010,
$1.0 million and $0.1 million are due to the Tri-Ocean
Heidmar and are included in Accounts Payable and
Accrued Liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet.
Blue
Fin Tankers Inc. pool (Blue Fin)
On October 29, 2008 the
M/T Olinda
was employed in the Blue Fin tankers spot pool for a minimum
period of twelve months. Blue Fin is a spot market pool managed
by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George Economou is the chairman of the
Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. and our Chief Executive
Officer is a member of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc.
The vessel, as a pool participant, is allocated part of the
pools revenues and voyage expenses, on a time charter
basis, in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula. In October 2008, the Company made an initial advance to
the pool for working capital purposes of $1.0 million. As
of December 31, 2009 and 2010 we had a receivable from the
pool, including advances made to the pool for working capital
purposes, of $1.9 million (of which $0.1 million is
included in receivables and $1.8 is included in
Prepayments and other) and $2.2 million (of
which $0.1 million is included in Receivables
and $2.1 million is included in Prepayments and
other),
D-77
respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The revenue of
M/T Olinda
deriving from the pool amounted to $2.6 million,
$8.0 million and $7.2 million for 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively and is included in Voyage revenue in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Sigma
Tankers Inc. pool (Sigma)
On December 22, 2009 and November 6, 2010, the
M/T Tigani
and the
M/T Tamara
were both employed in the Sigma Tankers Inc. pool for a
minimum period of twelve months. Sigma is a spot market pool
managed by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George Economou is the chairman
of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. and our Chief
Executive Officer is a member of the Board of Directors of
Heidmar Inc. The vessels, as pool participants, are allocated
part of the pools revenues and voyage expenses, on a time
charter basis, in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula. The vessels were redelivered from the Pool on
April 28, 2010 and January 6, 2011, respectively, due
to their sale on May 4, 2010 and January 13, 2011,
respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Company
had a receivable from the pool of $1.0 million and
$1,5 million, respectively, which is included in
Receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. The revenue of the
M/T Tigani
and the
M/T Tamara
deriving from the pool for 2009 amounted to $0.2 million
and nil, respectively, and for 2010 to $2.0 million and
$0.7 million, respectively, and is included in Voyage
revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Lease
Agreement
We have leased office space in Athens, Greece, from
Mr. George Economou. The lease commenced on April 24,
2007, with a duration of six months and the option for the
Company to extend it for another six months. The monthly rental
amounts to Euro 680 ($901 at the December 31, 2010
exchange rate). This agreement was terminated on
December 31, 2010. The rent charged for each of the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to
$0.01 million, respectively and is included in General and
Administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. On January 1, 2011 we entered
into a new lease agreement for the current office space leased
from a family member of Mr. George Economou, which
terminates on December 31, 2015.
Capital
infusion
On May 28, 2010, Basset Holding Inc., a company controlled
by Mr. Anthony Kandylidis, made an equity contribution of
$20 million in exchange for approximately 16,666,667
(50,000,000 before the reverse stock split effect, discussed in
Note 8(f)) to the consolidated financial statements, of the
Companys common shares at $0.40 per share before the
reverse stock split effect.
Vessels
Under Construction
On April 1, 2011, we entered into two agreements to
purchase two Capesize vessels under construction of 206,000 DWT
each, through the acquisition of the shares of the relevant
owning companies for a company ultimately controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer in exchange for an
aggregate of 35,657,142 common shares of the Company. The
vessels are scheduled to be delivered in the second and fourth
quarter of 2013. The total outstanding yard payments amount to
$96.24 million, of which $29.7 million is payable in
2012 and the balance is payable in 2013.
Consultancy
Agreement
Under an agreement between the Company and Steel Wheel
Investments Limited (Steel Wheel), a company
controlled by the our Chief Executive Officer, Steel Wheel
provides consulting services to the Company in connection with
the duties of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, for an
annual fee plus a discretional cash bonus as approved by the
Compensation Committee. Such fees and bonuses for 2008, 2009 and
2010 totaled $2.6 million, $4.0 million and
$3.8 million, respectively and are included in
General and administrative expenses, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Furthermore,
in 2009 and 2010 certain compensation in stock was granted to
Steel Wheel. Please see Note 11 to our accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
D-78
|
|
C.
|
Interests
of experts and counsel
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Information
|
|
|
A.
|
Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information
|
See Item 18.
Legal
Proceedings
OceanFreight is not currently involved in any legal proceedings
which may have a significant effect on its business, financial
position, and results of operations or liquidity. The
Companys former Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer had previously asserted a claim for breach of his
employment agreement and for unidentified post-employment
conduct by the Company. On April 7, 2008, the Company and
the former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
reached a settlement agreement resolving all claims asserted by
him.
In connection with this agreement, the Company issued to the
former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 21,053
common shares in exchange for 21,053 restricted subordinated
shares, plus an additional 52,105 common shares both of which
took effect on April 22, 2008. The related expense was
approximately $1,100,000 and is included in General and
Administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The Company also granted to Mr. Cowen certain registration
rights for the 52,105 common shares held by him.
From time to time, OceanFreight may be subject to legal
proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business,
involving principally commercial charter party disputes. It is
expected that these claims would be covered by insurance if they
involve liabilities arising from incidents such as a collision,
other marine casualty, damage to cargoes, oil pollution and
death or personal injuries to crew and are subject to customary
deductibles. Those claims, even if lacking merit, could result
in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial
resources.
Dividend
Policy
See discussion under Item 10.B
See discussion under Item 4.A. which includes disclosure of
significant changes since December 31, 2010.
D-79
|
|
Item 9.
|
The
Offer and Listing
|
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol OCNF. Since our initial public offering in
April 2007, the price history of our common stock is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter ended June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
19.67
|
|
|
$
|
19.14
|
|
3rd Quarter ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
23.54
|
|
|
|
22.67
|
|
4th Quarter ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
30.48
|
|
|
|
14.10
|
|
2007 Annual
|
|
|
30.48
|
|
|
|
14.10
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
24.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.71
|
|
2nd Quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
26.96
|
|
|
|
20.52
|
|
3rd Quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
23.23
|
|
|
|
11.87
|
|
4th Quarter ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
14.12
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
2008 Annual
|
|
|
26.96
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
5.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
2nd Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
3rd Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
4th Quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
2009 Annual
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
2nd Quarter ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
3rd Quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
4th Quarter ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
2010 Annual
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
Most Recent Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2010
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
November 2010
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
December 2010
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
January 2011
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
February 2011
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
Additional
Information
|
Not applicable.
|
|
B.
|
Memorandum
and articles of association
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-laws
Our purpose as set forth in Section B of our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation is to engage in any lawful
act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be
organized under the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act,
or BCA. Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and
by-laws do not impose any limitations on the ownership rights of
our shareholders.
D-80
Under our by-laws, annual shareholder meetings will be held at a
time and place selected by our Board of Directors. The meetings
may be held in or outside of the Marshall Islands. Special
meetings may be called by the Board of Directors, or by the
Chairman, or by our President. Our Board of Directors may set a
record date between 15 and 60 days before the date of any
meeting to determine the shareholders that will be eligible to
receive notice and vote at the meeting.
Directors
Our directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a
meeting of the shareholders by the holders of shares entitled to
vote in the election. There is no provision for cumulative
voting.
The Board of Directors may change the number of directors only
by a vote of at least
662/3%
of the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve
until his successor shall have been duly elected and qualified,
except in the event of his death, resignation, removal, or the
earlier termination of his term of office. The Board of
Directors has the authority to fix the amounts which shall be
payable to the members of our Board of Directors for attendance
at any meeting or for services rendered to the Company.
Subordinated
Shares
Following the dividend payment on August 14, 2008 in the
amount of $0.77 per share in respect of the second quarter of
2008, the Company satisfied the provisions under its Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation for the early conversion of
all of its issued and outstanding subordinated shares into
common shares on a
one-for-one
basis. Accordingly, on August 15, 2008 the then issued and
outstanding 2,085,150 subordinated shares, including 2,000,000
subordinated shares owned by Basset, a company controlled by
Mr. Antonis Kandylidis, our Chief Executive Officer, were
converted into common shares on a
one-for-one
basis.
Dividends
On December 12, 2008, our Board of Directors determined,
after careful consideration of various factors, including the
recent sharp decline in charter rates and vessel values in the
drybulk sector, to suspend the payment of cash dividends until
such time as the Board of Directors shall determine in its
discretion, in order to preserve capital. In addition, under the
January 9, 2009 amendatory agreement to our Nordea credit
facility which matures in October 2015, we are prohibited from
paying dividends during the term of such credit facility.
Dividend payments that would require use of the remaining 50% of
our quarterly net profits would be subject to our lenders
consent.
Prior to this suspension of dividend payments, our policy was to
declare and pay regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis from
our operating surplus, in amounts substantially equal to our
available cash from operations in the previous quarter, less any
cash reserves for drydockings and working capital, as our Board
of Directors might determine. Our target base dividend was $0.77
per common share, although the Board of Directors may change
this amount in its sole discretion. In May 2008, we paid a
dividend in the amount of $0.77 per share in respect of the
first quarter of 2008, in August 2008, we paid a dividend in the
amount of $0.77 per share in respect of the second quarter of
2008 and in November 2008, we paid a dividend in the amount of
$0.77 per share in respect of the third quarter of 2008.
Declaration and payment of any dividend is subject to the
discretion of our Board of Directors. The timing and amount of
dividend payments, if reinstated in the future, will be
dependent upon our earnings, financial condition, cash
requirements and availability, restrictions in our credit
agreement, the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the
payment of distributions to shareholders and other factors. The
payment of dividends, even if reinstated in the future, is not
guaranteed or assured, and may be discontinued at any time at
the discretion of our Board of Directors. Because we are a
holding company with no material assets other than the stock of
our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends will depend on
the earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries and their ability
to pay dividends to us. Marshall Islands law generally prohibits
the payment of dividends other than from our operating surplus
or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent
upon the payment thereof; but in
D-81
case there is no such surplus, dividends may be declared or paid
out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is
declared and for the preceding fiscal year.
Although the subordination period, as defined in our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation, terminated and all of our
outstanding subordinated shares converted into common shares on
a
one-for-one
basis following our dividend payment in the amount of $0.77 per
share in respect of the second quarter of 2008, if we reinstate
dividend payments in the future, we intend to pay such dividends
out of operating surplus only. Our Board of Directors will treat
all dividends as coming from operating surplus until the sum of
all dividends paid since the closing of our initial public
offering equals the amount of operating surplus as of the most
recent date of determination. Our undistributed operating
surplus at any point in time will be our operating surplus
accumulated since the closing of our initial public offering
less all dividends from operating surplus paid since the closing
of our initial public offering. We will treat dividends paid
from any amount in excess of our operating surplus, if any, as
liquidating dividends. The classification of dividends as
liquidating dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes
is governed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
and may be different than the classification of dividends under
the Companys Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation.
Operating
Surplus
Operating surplus means the greater of zero and the amount equal
to:
|
|
|
|
|
$5.0 million (which may be increased to $10.0 million
as described below); plus
|
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the completion of our initial
public offering, excluding cash receipts reorganizations or
restructurings, (5) the termination of interest rate swap
agreements, (6) sales or other dispositions of vessels
(except to the extent the proceeds from such dispositions exceed
the initial purchase price or contributed value of the vessel
subject to the disposition, which excess amount shall be treated
as operating surplus) and (7) sales or other dispositions
of other assets other than in the normal course of business; plus
|
|
|
|
interest paid on debt incurred and cash dividends paid on equity
securities issued by us, in each case, to finance all or any
portion of the construction, replacement or improvement of a
capital asset such as vessels during the period from such
financing until the earlier to occur of the date the capital
asset is put into service or the date that it is abandoned or
disposed of; plus
|
|
|
|
interest paid on debt incurred and cash dividends paid on our
equity securities issued by us, in each case, to pay the
construction period interest on debt incurred, or to pay
construction period dividends on our equity issued, to finance
the construction projects described in the immediately preceding
bullet; less
|
|
|
|
all of our cash expenditures after the completion of our initial
public offering, including, but not limited to operating
expenses, interest payments and taxes, but not (1) the
repayment of borrowings, (2) the repurchase of debt and
equity securities, (3) interest rate swap termination
costs, (4) expenses and taxes related to borrowings, sales
of equity and debt securities, capital contributions, corporate
reorganizations or restructurings, the termination of interest
rate swap agreements, sales or other dispositions of vessels,
and sales or dispositions of other assets other than in the
normal course of business, (5) capital expenditures and
(6) payment of dividends, such expenditures are hereinafter
referred to as Operating Expenditures; less
|
|
|
|
cash capital expenditures incurred after the completion of our
initial public offering to maintain our vessels and other assets
including drydocking, replacement of equipment on the vessels,
repairs and similar expenditures, but excluding capital
expenditures for or related to the acquisition of additional
vessels, and including capital expenditures for replacement of a
vessel as a result of damage or loss prior to normal retirement,
net of any insurance proceeds, warranty payments or similar
property not treated as cash receipts for this purpose, such
capital expenditures are hereinafter referred to as Maintenance
Capital Expenditures; less
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our Board of
Directors for future (1) Operating Expenditures and
(2) Maintenance Capital Expenditures.
|
D-82
The $5.0 million amount in the first bullet point above may
be increased by our Board of Directors to $10.0 million
only if our board determines such increase is necessary to allow
it to pay all or part of the base dividend on our common shares.
As described above, our operating surplus, for determining
whether we are paying ordinary dividends or liquidating
dividends, does not reflect only cash on hand that is generated
from our operations. For example, it includes a provision that
will enable us to pay, under circumstances described above, a
dividend from our operating surplus of up to $10.0 million
of cash we receive from non-operating sources, such as asset
sales, issuances of securities and borrowings. In addition, the
effect of including, as described above, certain dividends on
equity securities or interest payments on debt, related to the
construction, replacement or improvement of an asset in
operating surplus would be to increase our operating surplus by
the amount of any such dividends or interest payments. As a
result, we may also pay dividends from our operating surplus up
to the amount of any such dividends or interest payments from
cash we receive from non-operating sources.
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that
the construction or application of the definition of operating
surplus may be adjusted in the case of any particular
transaction or matter or type of transaction or matter if our
Board of Directors, with the concurrence of our audit committee,
is of the opinion that the adjustment is necessary or
appropriate to further the overall purpose and intent of the
definition of operating surplus.
Liquidating
Dividends
We do not expect to pay liquidating dividends.
Adjustment
of Base Dividend
The base dividend is subject to downward adjustment in the case
of liquidating dividends. The base dividend amount will be
reduced in the same proportion that the liquidating dividend had
to the fair market value of the common shares prior to the
payment of the liquidating dividend. So long as the common
shares are publicly traded on a national securities exchange or
market, that price will be the average closing sale price on
each of the five trading days before the dividend date. If the
shares are not publicly traded, the price will be determined by
our Board of Directors.
In addition to the adjustment for liquidating dividends, if we
combine our shares into fewer shares or subdivide our shares
into a greater number of shares, we will proportionately adjust
the base dividend level.
Voting
Rights
The holders of the common shares are entitled to one vote per
share on each matter requiring the approval of the holders of
our common shares, whether pursuant to our Articles, our Bylaws,
the Marshall Islands Business Corporation Act or otherwise. Our
directors shall be elected by a plurality vote of the common
shares. A majority of the common shares in the aggregate shall
constitute a quorum. Any preferred shares shall have whatever
voting rights are provided on their issuance.
Upon our dissolution or liquidation or the sale of all or
substantially all of our assets, after payment in full of all
amounts required to be paid to creditors and to any holders of
preferred shares having liquidation preferences, the holders of
all classes of our common shares will be entitled to receive pro
rata our remaining assets available for distribution. Holders of
our common shares do not have conversion, redemption or
pre-emptive rights to subscribe to any of our securities. The
powers, preferences and rights of holders of all classes of our
common shares are subject to the rights of the holders of any
preferred shares that we may issue in the future.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions of Our Charter Documents
Several provisions of our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation and by-laws may have anti-takeover effects. These
provisions are intended to avoid costly takeover battles, lessen
our vulnerability to a hostile change of control and enhance the
ability of our Board of Directors to maximize shareholder value
in connection with any unsolicited offer to acquire us. However,
these anti-takeover provisions, which are summarized below,
could also
D-83
discourage, delay or prevent (1) the merger or acquisition
of our company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or
otherwise, that a shareholder may consider in its best interest
and (2) the removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Blank
Check Preferred Stock
Under the terms of our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation, our Board of Directors has authority, without any
further vote or action by our shareholders, to issue up to
5,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock. Our Board
of Directors may issue shares of preferred stock on terms
calculated to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control
of our company or the removal of our management.
Stockholders
Rights Agreement
We entered into a Stockholders Rights Agreement with American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent,
effective as of April 30, 2008, which has since been
amended. Under this Agreement, we declared a dividend payable of
one preferred share purchase right, or Right, to purchase one
one-thousandth of a share of the Companys Series A
Participating Preferred Stock for each outstanding share of
OceanFreight Inc. common stock, par value U.S.$0.01 per share.
The Rights will separate from the common stock and become
exercisable after (1) the 10th day after public
announcement that a person or group acquires ownership of 20% or
more of the companys common stock or (2) the
10th business day (or such later date as determined by the
companys board of directors) after a person or group
announces a tender or exchange offer which would result in that
person or group holding 20% or more of the companys common
stock. On the distribution date, each holder of a Right will be
entitled to purchase for $100 (the Exercise Price) a
fraction (1/1000th) of one share of the companys preferred
stock which has similar economic terms as one share of common
stock. If an acquiring person (an Acquiring Person)
acquires more than 20% of the companys common stock then
each holder of a Right (except that Acquiring Person) will be
entitled to buy at the exercise price, a number of shares of the
companys common stock which has a market value of twice
the exercise price. Any time after the date an Acquiring Person
obtains more than 20% of the companys common stock and
before that Acquiring Person acquires more than 50% of the
companys outstanding common stock, the company may
exchange each Right owned by all other rights holders, in whole
or in part, for one share of the companys common stock. We
amended the definition of Acquiring Person to exempt
the May 2010 share purchase by Basset and the April
2011 share purchase by Haywood Finance Limited, both of
which are companies owned and controlled by our Chief Executive
Officer, Anthony Kandylidis. The Rights expire on the earliest
of (1) May 12, 2018 or (2) the exchange or
redemption of the Rights as described above. The company can
redeem the Rights at any time on or prior to the earlier of a
public announcement that a person has acquired ownership of 20%
or more of the companys common stock, or the expiration
date. The terms of the Rights and the Stockholders Rights
Agreement may be amended without the consent of the Rights
holders at any time on or prior to the Distribution Date. After
the Distribution Date, the terms of the Rights and the
Stockholders Rights Agreement may be amended to make changes
that do not adversely affect the rights of the rights holders
(other than the Acquiring Person). The Rights do not have any
voting rights. The rights have the benefit of certain customary
anti-dilution protections.
Classified
Board of Directors
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation provide for a
Board of Directors serving staggered, three-year terms.
Approximately one-third of our Board of Directors will be
elected each year. This classified board provision could
discourage a third party from making a tender offer for our
shares or attempting to obtain control of our company. It could
also delay shareholders who do not agree with the policies of
the Board of Directors from removing a majority of the Board of
Directors for two years.
Election
and Removal of Directors
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and by-laws
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors. Our
by-laws require parties other than the Board of Directors to
give advance written notice of nominations for the election of
directors. Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
and by-laws also provide that our directors may be removed only
for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of
at least
D-84
662/3%
of the outstanding common shares and subordinated shares
entitled to vote for those directors considered for this purpose
as one class. These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent
the removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Limited
Actions by Shareholders
Our by-laws provide that any action required or permitted to be
taken by our shareholders must be effected at an annual or
special meeting of shareholders or by the unanimous written
consent of our shareholders. Our Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation and our by-laws provide that only our Board of
Directors, or our Chairman, or our President may call special
meetings of our shareholders and the business transacted at the
special meeting is limited to the purposes stated in the notice.
Business
Combinations
Although the BCA does not contain specific provisions regarding
business combinations between corporations organized
under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands and
interested shareholders, we have included these
provisions in our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation. Our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation contain provisions which prohibit us from engaging
in a business combination with an interested shareholder for a
period of three years after the date of the transaction in which
the person became an interested shareholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the date of the transaction that resulted in the
shareholder becoming an interested shareholder, our Board of
Directors approved either the business combination or the
transaction that resulted in the shareholder becoming an
interested shareholder;
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
shareholder becoming an interested shareholder, the interested
shareholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced;
|
|
|
|
at or subsequent to the date of the transaction that resulted in
the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder, the business
combination is approved by the Board of Directors and authorized
at an annual or special meeting of shareholders by the
affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested shareholder; and
|
|
|
|
the shareholder became an interested shareholder prior to the
consummation of our initial public offering.
|
For purposes of these provisions, a business
combination includes mergers, consolidations, exchanges,
asset sales, leases and other transactions resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested shareholder and an
interested shareholder is any person or entity that
beneficially owns 20% or more of our outstanding voting stock
and any person or entity affiliated with or controlling or
controlled by that person or entity.
Other
Matters
Dissenters Rights of Appraisal and
Payment. Under the BCA, our shareholders have the
right to dissent from various corporate actions, including any
merger or sale of all or substantially all of our assets not
made in the usual course of our business, and receive payment of
the fair value of their shares. In the event of any further
amendment of the articles, a shareholder also has the right to
dissent and receive payment for his or her shares if the
amendment alters certain rights in respect of those shares. The
dissenting shareholder must follow the procedures set forth in
the BCA to receive payment. In the event that we and any
dissenting shareholder fail to agree on a price for the shares,
the BCA procedures involve, among other things, the institution
of proceedings in the circuit court in the judicial circuit in
the Marshall Islands in which our Marshall Islands office is
situated. The value of the shares of the dissenting shareholder
is fixed by the court after reference, if the court so elects,
to the recommendations of a court-appointed appraiser.
Shareholders Derivative Actions. Under
the BCA, any of our shareholders may bring an action in our name
to procure a judgment in our favor, also known as a derivative
action, provided that the shareholder bringing the
D-85
action is a holder of common shares both at the time the
derivative action is commenced and at the time of the
transaction to which the action relates.
Attached as exhibits to this annual report are the contracts we
consider to be both material and not entered into in the
ordinary course of business.
For a description of our credit facility and commitment letter,
see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Liquidity and Capital Resources. For
a description of our Stockholders Rights Agreement, see
Item 10.B Memorandum and articles of
association. For a description of our agreements with
related parties, see Item 7.B Related Party
Transactions.
We have no other material contracts, other than contracts
entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which the
Company or any member of the group is a party.
Under the laws of the countries of incorporation of the Company
and its subsidiaries, there are currently no restrictions on the
export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls
or restrictions that affect the remittance of dividends,
interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common
stock.
Marshall
Islands Tax Considerations
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands. Under current
Marshall Islands law, we are not be subject to tax on income or
capital gains, and no Marshall Islands withholding tax will be
imposed upon distributions to our shareholders.
United
States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a discussion of the material United States
federal income tax considerations with respect to the Company
and to U.S. Holders and
Non-U.S. Holders,
each as defined below, of the ownership of common shares. The
following discussion of United States federal income tax matters
is based on the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or
the Code, judicial decisions, administrative
pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations
promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, or
the Treasury Regulations, all of which are subject
to change, possibly with retroactive effect.
United
States Federal Income Taxation of Operating Income: In
General
Unless exempt from United States federal income taxation under
the rules discussed below, a foreign corporation is subject to
United States federal income taxation in respect of any income
that is derived from the use of vessels, from the hiring or
leasing of vessels for use on a time, voyage or bareboat charter
basis, from the participation in a pool, partnership, strategic
alliance, joint operating agreement, code sharing arrangements
or other joint venture it directly or indirectly owns or
participates in that generates such income, or from the
performance of services directly related to those uses, which we
refer to as shipping income, to the extent that the
shipping income is derived from sources within the United
States. For these purposes, 50% of shipping income that is
attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that
does not both begin and end, in the United States constitutes
income from sources within the United States, which we refer to
as
U.S.-source
shipping income.
Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins
and ends in the United States is considered to be 100% from
sources within the United States. We are not permitted by law to
engage in transportation that produces shipping income which is
considered to be 100% from sources within the United States.
Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively
between
non-U.S. ports
will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the
United States. Shipping income derived from sources outside the
United States will not be subject to any United States federal
income tax.
D-86
Exemption
of Operating Income from United States Federal Income
Taxation
Under Section 883 of the Code, we will be exempt from
United States federal income taxation on our
U.S.-source
shipping income if:
(1) we are organized in a foreign country (our
country of organization) that grants an
equivalent exemption to corporations organized in
the United States in respect of each category of shipping income
for which exemption is being claimed under Section 883 of
the Code; and
(2) either:
(A) more than 50% of the value of our stock is owned,
directly or indirectly, by individuals who are
residents of our country of organization or of
another foreign country that grants an equivalent
exemption to corporations organized in the United States,
which we refer to as the 50% Ownership Test, or
(B) a class of our stock representing more than 50% of the
vote and value of our outstanding stock is primarily and
regularly traded on an established securities market in
our country of organization, in another country that grants an
equivalent exemption to United States corporations,
or in the United States, which we refer to as the
Publicly-Traded Test.
The Republic of the Marshall Islands, the jurisdiction where we
and our ship-owning subsidiaries are incorporated, grants an
equivalent exemption to United States
corporations. Therefore, we will be exempt from
United States federal income taxation with respect to our
U.S.-source
shipping income if we satisfy either the 50% Ownership Test or
the Publicly-Traded Test.
Publicly-Traded
Test
The Treasury Regulations under Section 883 of the Code
provide, in pertinent part, that shares of a foreign corporation
will be considered to be primarily traded on an
established securities market in a country if the
number of shares of each class of stock that are traded during
any taxable year on all established securities markets in that
country exceeds the number of shares in each such class that are
traded during that year on established securities markets in any
other single country. Our common shares, which constitute our
sole class of issued and outstanding stock, are primarily
traded on the Nasdaq Global Market, which is an
established securities market in the
United States.
Under the Treasury Regulations, our common shares will be
considered to be regularly traded on an established
securities market if one or more classes of our stock
representing more than 50% of our outstanding stock, by both
total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to
vote and total value, are listed on such market, to which we
refer as the Listing Threshold. Since our common
shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, we expect to have
satisfied the Listing Threshold.
It is further required that with respect to each class of stock
relied upon to meet the Listing Threshold, (1) such class
of stock is traded on the market, other than in minimal
quantities, on at least 60 days during the taxable year or
one-sixth of the days in a short taxable year, or the
Trading Frequency Test; and (ii) the aggregate
number of shares of such class of stock traded on such market
during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of
shares of such class of stock outstanding during such year or as
appropriately adjusted in the case of a short taxable year, or
the Trading Volume Test. We expect to have satisfied
the Trading Frequency Test and Trading Volume Test.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasury Regulations provide,
in pertinent part, that a class of stock will not be considered
to be regularly traded on an established securities
market for any taxable year during which 50% or more of the vote
and value of the outstanding shares of such class are owned,
actually or constructively under specified attribution rules, on
more than half the days during the taxable year by persons who
each own 5% or more of the vote and value of such class of
outstanding shares, which persons we refer to as 5%
Shareholders and rule as the 5% Override Rule.
In the event the 5% Override Rule is triggered, the Treasury
Regulations provide that the 5% Override Rule will nevertheless
not apply if it can be established that, within the group of 5%
Shareholders, there are sufficient qualified shareholders for
purposes of Section 883 of the Code to preclude
D-87
non-qualified
shareholders in such group from owning 50% or more of the value
of the outstanding shares of such class for more than half the
number of days during the taxable year and certain
substantiation requirements are satisfied. For purposes of
identifying our 5% Shareholders, the Treasury Regulations permit
us to rely on Schedule 13G and Schedule 13D filings
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Company believes that the 5% Override Rule was not triggered
during the 2010 taxable year.
Accordingly, we believe that we satisfied the Publicly-Traded
Test for the 2010 taxable year and, consequently, were eligible
for exemption from U.S. federal income tax under
Section 833 of the Code, and we intend to take this
position on our United States federal income tax returns
for the 2010 taxable year. Although we expect to continue
qualifying for exemption under Section 883 of the Code,
there are circumstances beyond our control which could cause us
to lose the benefits of the exemption in any future taxable
year. For example, if the 5% Override Rule is triggered, there
is no assurance that we will have sufficient qualified 5%
Shareholders to satisfy the exception to the 5% Override Rule,
nor that we will be able to satisfy the onerous substantiation
requirements associated with such exception.
United States
Federal Income Taxation in Absence of Exemption
To the extent the benefits of Section 883 of the Code are
unavailable, our U.S. source shipping income, to the
extent not considered to be effectively connected
with the conduct of a United States trade or business, as
described below, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by
Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without the
benefit of deductions, which we refer to as the 4% gross
basis tax regime. Since under the sourcing rules described
above, no more than 50% of our shipping income would be treated
as being derived from United States sources, the maximum
effective rate of U.S. federal income tax on our shipping
income would never exceed 2% under the 4% gross basis tax regime.
To the extent the benefits of the exemption under
Section 883 of the Code are unavailable and our
U.S.-source
shipping income is considered to be effectively
connected with the conduct of a United States trade
or business, as described below, any such effectively
connected
U.S.-source
shipping income, net of applicable deductions, would be subject
to United States federal income tax currently imposed at
corporate rates of up to 35%. In addition, we may be subject to
the 30% branch profits tax on earnings effectively
connected with the conduct of such trade or business, as
determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and on
certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct
of such United States trade or business.
Our
U.S.-source
shipping income would be considered effectively
connected with the conduct of a United States trade
or business only if:
|
|
|
|
|
We have, or are considered to have, a fixed place of business in
the United States involved in the earning of shipping
income; and
|
|
|
|
substantially all of our
U.S.-source
shipping income is attributable to regularly scheduled
transportation, such as the operation of a vessel that follows a
published schedule with repeated sailings at regular intervals
between the same points for voyages that begin or end in the
United States.
|
We do not intend to have, or permit circumstances that would
result in having any vessel operating to the United States
on a regularly scheduled basis. Based on the foregoing and on
the expected mode of our shipping operations and other
activities, we believe that none of our
U.S.-source
shipping income will be effectively connected with
the conduct of a United States trade or business.
United States
Federal Income Taxation of Gain on Sale of Vessels
If, as we believe, we qualify for exemption from
United States federal income tax under Section 883 of
the Code in respect of the shipping income derived from the
international operation of our vessels, then gain from the sale
of any such vessel should likewise be exempt from tax under
Section 883 of the Code. If, however, our shipping income
does not for whatever reason qualify for exemption under
Section 883 of the Code, then any gain on the sale of a
vessel will be subject to U.S. federal income tax if such
sale occurs in the United States. To the extent possible,
we intend to structure our sales of vessels so that the gain
therefrom is not subject to U.S. federal income tax.
However, there is no assurance we will be able to do so.
D-88
United States
Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders
The following is a discussion of the material United States
federal income tax considerations relevant to an investment
decision by a U.S. Holder, as defined below, with respect
to our common shares. This discussion does not purport to deal
with the tax consequences of owning common shares to all
categories of investors, some of which, such as dealers in
securities, investors whose functional currency is not the
United States dollar and investors that own, actually or
under applicable constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of
our common shares, may be subject to special rules. This
discussion deals only with investors that hold our common shares
as a capital asset. Investors are encouraged to consult their
own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences arising
in their own particular situations under United States
federal, state, local or foreign law of the ownership of common
shares.
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a
beneficial owner of common shares that
|
|
|
|
|
is an individual United States citizen or resident, a
United States corporation or other United States
entity taxable as a corporation, an estate the income of which
is subject to United States federal income taxation
regardless of its source, or a trust if a court within the
United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the
administration of the trust and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust; and
|
|
|
|
owns less than ten percent (10%) of our common shares as a
capital assets for United States federal income tax
purposes.
|
If a partnership holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a
partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and
upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in
a partnership holding our common shares, you are encouraged to
consult your tax advisor.
United States
Federal Income Tax Treatment of Common Stock
Distributions
Subject to the discussion of passive federal foreign investment
companies below, distributions made by us with respect to our
common shares to a U.S. Holder will generally constitute
dividends to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings
and profits, as determined under United States federal
income tax principles, and will be included in the
U.S. Holders gross income. Distributions in excess of
such earnings and profits are treated first a nontaxable return
of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holders tax
basis in his common shares on a dollar
for dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain.
Because we are not a United States corporation,
U.S. Holders that are corporations will not be entitled to
claim a dividends reduction with respect to any distributions it
receives from the Company. Dividends paid with respect to our
common shares will generally be treated as passive
category income for purposes of computing allowable
foreign tax credits for United States foreign tax credit
purposes.
Dividends paid on our common shares to a U.S. Holder who is
an individual, trust or estate, a
U.S. Non Corporate Holder, will,
under current law, generally be treated as qualified
dividend income that is taxable to such
U.S. Non Corporate Holder at preferential
U.S. federal income tax rates (through 2012), provided that
(1) the common shares are readily tradable on an
established securities market in the United States (such as
the Nasdaq National Market on which our common shares are
listed); (2) the Company is not a passive foreign
investment company for the taxable year during which the
dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year
(which the Company does not believe it has been, is or will be,
as discussed in more detail below); (3) the
U.S. Non Corporate Holder has owned the common
shares for more than 60 days in the 121 day
period beginning 60 days before the date on which the
common shares becomes ex-dividend; and (4) the
U.S. Non Corporate Holder is under no
obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in
substantially similar or related property. Special rules may
apply to any extraordinary dividend generally, a
dividend paid by the Company in an amount equal to or in excess
of 10% of a shareholders adjusted tax basis in his common
shares. If the Company pays an extraordinary
dividend on its common shares that is treated as
qualified dividend income, then any loss derived by
a U.S. Non Corporate Holder from the sale or
exchange of such common shares will be treated as
long term capital loss to the extent of such
dividend.
D-89
Legislation has previously been introduced in the
U.S. Congress which, if enacted in its present form would
preclude our dividends from qualifying for such preferential tax
rates prospectively from the date of its enactment. In addition
in the absence of legislation extending the term of the
preferential tax rates for qualified dividend income, all
dividends received by a taxpayer after 2012 will be taxed at
ordinary graduated rates. Accordingly, there is no assurance
that any dividends paid on our common shares will be eligible
for these preferential tax rates in the hands of a
U.S. Non-Corporate Holder. Any dividends, which the Company
pays which are not eligible for these preferential tax rates,
will be taxed as ordinary income to a U.S. Non-Corporate
Holder.
Sale,
Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Shares
Assuming the Company does not constitute a passive foreign
investment company for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder
generally will recognize taxable gain or loss up on a sale,
exchange or other disposition of our common shares in an amount
equal to the difference between the amount realized by the
U.S. Holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition
and the U.S. Holders tax basis in such shares. Such
gain or loss will be treated as long term capital
gain or loss if the U.S. Holders holding period is
greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other
disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated
as United States source income or loss, as applicable, for
United States foreign tax credit purposes. Long
term capital gains of U.S. Non Corporate
Holders are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. A
U.S. Holders ability to deduct capital losses is
subject to certain limitations.
Passive
Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
A foreign corporation will be treated as a passive foreign
investment company, or a PFIC, for United States
federal income tax purposes, during any taxable year if
(1) 75% or more of its gross income for such taxable year
consists of certain types of passive income or
(2) 50% or more of the average value of its assets for such
taxable year produce or are held for the production of such
types of passive income.
For purposes of determining whether the Company is a PFIC, the
Company will be treated as earning and owning its proportionate
share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of its
subsidiary corporations in which it owns at least 25% of the
value of the subsidiarys stock. Income earned, or deemed
earned, by us in connection with the performance of services
would not constitute passive income. By contrast,
rental income would generally constitute passive
income unless the Company was treated under specific rules
as deriving its rental income in the active conduct of a trade
or business.
The Company does not believe that it was a PFIC during the 2010
taxable year. In addition, based on present operations and
future projections, the Company does not expect to become a PFIC
for any future taxable year. Although there is no legal
authority directly on point, and the Company is not relying upon
an opinion of counsel on this issue, this belief is based
principally on the position that, for purposes of determining
whether the Company is a PFIC, the gross income the Company
derives or is deemed to derive from the time chartering and
voyage chartering activities of its wholly owned subsidiaries
should constitute services income, rather than rental income.
Correspondingly, such income should not constitute passive
income, and the assets that the Company or its wholly owned
subsidiaries own and operate in connection with the production
of such income, in particular, the vessels, should not
constitute passive assets that produce or are held for the
production of for purposes of determining whether the Company is
a PFIC. There is substantial legal authority supporting this
position consisting of case law and United States Internal
Revenue Service or IRS pronouncements concerning the
characterization of income derived from time charters as
services income for other tax purposes. However, there is also
authority which characterizes time charter income as rental
income rather than services income for other tax purposes. It
should be noted that in the absence of any legal authority
specifically relating to the statutory provisions governing
PFICs, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position.
Furthermore, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a
manner to avoid being classified as a PFIC with respect to any
taxable year, we cannot assure that the nature of our operations
will not change in the future.
If the Company was to be classified as a PFIC in any taxable
year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to different
United States federal income taxation rules depending on
whether the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a
D-90
Qualified Electing Fund, which election we refer to
as a QEF election. As an alternative to making a QEF
election, a U.S. Holder should be able to make a
mark-to-market
election with respect to our common shares, as discussed below.
In addition, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable
year after 2010, a U.S. Holder would be required to file an
annual report with the IRS for that year with respect to such
U.S. Holders common shares.
U.S.
Holders Making a Timely QEF Election
If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election, which
U.S. Holder we refer to as an Electing Holder,
the Electing Holder must report for United States federal
income tax purposes his pro rata share of our ordinary earnings
and net capital gain, if any, for each taxable year of the
Company during which it is a PFIC that ends with or within the
taxable year of the Electing Holder, regardless of whether
distributions were received from us by the Electing Holder. The
Electing Holders adjusted tax basis in the common shares
would be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings
and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that had been
previously taxed would result in a corresponding reduction in
the adjusted tax basis in the common shares and would not be
taxed again once distributed. An Electing Holder would not,
however, be entitled to a deduction for his pro rata share of
any losses that we incur with respect to any taxable year. An
Electing Holder would generally recognize capital gain or loss
on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares.
U.S.
Holders Making a
Mark-to-Market
Election
Alternatively, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any
taxable year and, as we anticipate will be the case, our common
shares are treated as marketable stock, a
U.S. Holder would be permitted to make a
mark-to-market
election with respect to our common shares. If that election is
made, the U.S. Holder generally would include as ordinary
income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair
market value of the common shares at the end of the taxable year
over such U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the
common shares. The U.S. Holder would also be permitted an
ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the common shares
over its fair market value at the end of the taxable year, but
only to the extent of the net amount previously included in
income as a result of the
mark-to-market
election. A U.S. Holders tax basis in his common
shares would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss
amount. Gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition
of our common shares would be treated as ordinary income, and
any loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of
the common shares would be treated as ordinary loss to the
extent that such loss does not exceed the net
mark-to-market
gains previously included by the U.S. Holder.
U.S.
Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or
Mark-to-Market
Election
Finally, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable
year, a U.S. Holder who does not make either a QEF election
or a
mark-to-market
election for that year, whom we refer to as a Non-Electing
Holder, would be subject to special rules with respect to
(1) any excess distribution (i.e., the portion of any
distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder on the common
shares in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual
distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder in the three
preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing
Holders holding period for the common shares), and
(2) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other
disposition of our common shares. Under these special rules:
|
|
|
|
|
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over
the Non-Electing Holders aggregate holding period for the
common shares;
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any
taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a
PFIC, would be taxed as ordinary income; and
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be
subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the
applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest
charge for the deemed tax deferral benefit would be imposed with
respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other
taxable year.
|
D-91
United States
Federal Income Taxation of
Non-U.S.
Holders
A beneficial owner of common stock (other than a partnership)
that is not a U.S. Holder is referred to herein as a
Non-U.S. Holder.
Dividends
on Common Shares
Non- U.S Holders generally will not be subject to
United States federal income tax or withholding tax on
dividends received with respect to our common shares, unless
that income is effectively connected with the Non
U.S. Holders conduct of a trade or business in the
United States. If the Non U.S. Holder is
entitled to the benefits of a United States income tax
treaty with respect to those dividends, that income is subject
to United States federal income only if attributable to a
permanent establishment maintained by the Non
U.S. Holder in the United States. See discussion above
under United States Tax Consequences
Taxation of Operating Income: In General.
Sale,
Exchange or other Disposition of Common Shares
Non-U.S. Holders
generally will not be subject to United States federal
income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the
sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the
Non-U.S. Holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and,
if the
Non-U.S. Holder
is entitled to the benefits of a United States income tax
treaty with respect to that gain, the gain is attributable to a
permanent establishment maintained by the
Non-U.S. Holder
in the United States); or
|
|
|
|
the
Non-U.S. Holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and
other conditions are met.
|
If the Non U.S. Holder is engaged in a
United States trade or business for United States
federal income tax purposes, the income from the common shares,
including dividends and the gain from the sale, exchange or
other disposition of the common shares, that is effectively
connected with the conduct of that trade or business, will
generally be subject to regular United States federal
income tax in the same manner as discussed in the previous
section relating to the taxation of U.S. Holders. In
addition, in the case of a corporate Non
U.S. Holder, the
Non-U.S. Holders
earnings and profits that are attributable to the effectively
connected income, subject to certain adjustments, may be subject
to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or at a
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable
United States income tax treaty.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, dividend payments or other distributions, made
within the United States to a shareholder, will be subject
to information reporting requirements if the shareholder is a
U.S. Non-Corporate Holder. Such payments or distributions
may also be subject to backup withholding tax if such
shareholder:
|
|
|
|
|
fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number;
|
|
|
|
is notified by the IRS that the shareholder failed to report all
interest or dividends required to be shown on the
shareholders United States federal income tax
returns; or
|
|
|
|
in certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable
certification requirements.
|
Non-U.S. Holders
may be required to establish their exemption from information
reporting and backup withholding by certifying their status on
IRS
Form W-8B
or W-8IMY,
as applicable.
If a
Non-U.S. Holder
sells common shares to or through a United States office of
a broker, the payment of the proceeds is subject to both
United States backup withholding and information reporting
unless the
Non-U.S. Holder
certifies that the
Non-U.S. Holder
is a
non-United States
person, under penalties of perjury, or otherwise establishes an
exemption. If the
Non-U.S. Holder
sells common shares through a
non-United States
office of a
non-United States
broker and the sales proceeds are paid to the
Non-U.S. Holder
outside the United States, then information reporting and
backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment.
United States information reporting requirements, but not
backup withholding, however, will apply to a payment of sales
proceeds, even if that
D-92
payment is made to the
Non-U.S. Holder
outside the United States, if the
Non-U.S. Holder
sells common shares through a
non-United States
office of a broker that is a United States person or has
some other contacts with the United States. Such
information reporting requirements will not apply, however, if
the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the
Non-U.S. Holder is a
non-United States
person and certain other conditions are met, or the
Non-U.S. Holder
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, you
generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under
backup withholding rules that exceed your United States
federal income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the
IRS.
|
|
F.
|
Dividends
and paying agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We file reports and other information with the SEC. These
materials, including this annual report and the accompanying
exhibits, may be inspected and copied at the public reference
facilities maintained by the Commission at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, or
from the SECs website
http://www.sec.gov.
You may obtain information on the operation of the public
reference room by calling 1 (800) SEC-0330 and you may
obtain copies at prescribed rates.
|
|
I.
|
Subsidiary
information
|
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk:
For fiscal years 2009 and 2010, the interest rate we paid under
all of our long-term debt was LIBOR plus a margin. Amounts drawn
under our long-term arrangements are secured by the assets of
the Company. Because the interest on the debt was at a floating
rate, changes in interest rates would have no effect on the
value of the debt. Under the terms of our loan agreements a
change in the LIBOR rate of 100 basis points would have
changed interest expense for year 2010 by $2.3 million.
On January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest swap
agreements to partially hedge our exposure to variability in
LIBOR rates. Under the terms of the agreements we have fixed our
interest rate at 6.05% inclusive of margin. a change in the
LIBOR rate of 100 basis points would have changed interest
expense for year 2010 by $2.4 million.
Currency
and Exchange Rates:
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but
currently incur approximately 27.4% of our operating expenses
and the majority of our administration expenses in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro. For
accounting purposes, expenses incurred in Euros are converted
into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the
date of each transaction. Because a significant portion of our
expenses are incurred in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, our expenses may from time to time increase
relative to our revenues as a result of fluctuations in exchange
rates, particularly between the U.S. dollar and the Euro,
which could affect our net income. As of December 31, 2010,
the effect of a 1% adverse movement in U.S. dollar/Euro
exchange rates would not have a material effect on our results
of operations. While we historically have not mitigated the risk
associated with exchange rate fluctuations through the use of
financial derivatives, we may determine to employ such
instruments from time to time in the future in order to minimize
this risk. Our use of financial derivatives, including interest
rate
D-93
swaps, would involve certain risks, including the risk that
losses on a hedged position could exceed the nominal amount
invested in the instrument and the risk that the counterparty to
the derivative transaction may be unable or unwilling to satisfy
its contractual obligations, which could have an adverse effect
on our results.
Item 12. Description
of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13. Defaults,
Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Please see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.
Item 14. Material
Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of
Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 15. Controls
and Procedures
|
|
a)
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
|
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports that it files or submits to the SEC
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
|
|
b)
|
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act. The Companys internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision
of the Companys Chief Executive Officer to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of the Companys financial
statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States.
Management has conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on
this assessment, management has determined that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010 is effective.
|
|
c)
|
Attestation
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
The registered public accounting firm that audited the
consolidated financial statements, Ernst &
Young (Hellas), Certified Auditors Accountants S.A., has issued
an attestation report on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting,
appearing under Item 18, and is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
d)
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
None.
D-94
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls
or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or
detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there
are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due
to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been
detected.
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments
in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in
part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls
effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
Item 16A. Audit
Committee Financial Expert
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. George
Biniaris, who serves on the Audit Committee, qualifies as an
audit committee financial expert and that he is
independent according to Securities and Exchange
Commission rules.
Item 16B. Code
of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to officers,
directors and employees. Our code of ethics complies with
applicable guidelines issued by the SEC and is available for
review on our website:
http://www.oceanfreightinc.com.
Item 16C. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Our principal accountants for the years ended December 31,
2010 and 2009 were Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified
Auditors Accountants S.A. The Audit Fees for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were
Euro 295,000 ($390,963) and Euro 409,500 ($542,710),
respectively, with dollar values based in the currency exchange
rate as at December 31, 2010. There were no additional
Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees or
Other Fees billed in 2010 and 2009. Audit fees in
2010 relate to audit services provided in connection with SAS
100 reviews, the audit of our consolidated financial statements,
the audit of internal control over financial reporting, as well
as audit services performed in connection with the
Companys equity offerings.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment,
replacement, compensation, evaluation and oversight of the work
of the independent auditors. As part of this responsibility, the
Audit Committee pre- approves the audit and non-audit services
performed by the independent auditors in order to assure that
they do not impair the auditors independence from the
Company. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy which sets
forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which
services proposed to be performed by the independent auditors
may be pre-approved.
All audit services and other services provided by Ernst and
Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A. were
pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Item 16D. Exemptions
from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
None.
D-95
Item 16E. Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
The below discloses purchases of our equity securities by our
affiliated purchasers since January 1, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer or Affiliated Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Amount in
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Average
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
U.S.$ That May Yet
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Price
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
Be Expected on
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Paid per
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
Share Repurchases
|
Period
|
|
Affiliated Purchaser(1)
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Shares*
|
|
Announced Programs
|
|
Under Programs
|
|
May 2010
|
|
Basset Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
16,666,667
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
April 2011
|
|
Haywood Finance Limited
|
|
|
35,657,142
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Both of these affiliated purchasers are companies beneficially
owned by our chief executive officer. |
|
(2) |
|
This figure gives effect to the 3:1 reverse stock split in 2010. |
Item 16F. Change
in Registrants Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16G. Corporate
Governance
We have certified to Nasdaq that our corporate governance
practices are in compliance with, and are not prohibited by, the
laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Therefore, we are
exempt from many of Nasdaq corporate governance practices other
than the requirements regarding the disclosure of a going
concern audit opinion, submission of a listing agreement,
notification of material non-compliance with Nasdaq corporate
governance practices and the establishment of an audit committee
in accordance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rules 4350(d)(3) and
4350(d)(2)(A)(ii). The practices we follow in lieu of Nasdaq
corporate governance rules are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors is comprised of a majority of independent
directors which holds at least one annual meeting at which only
independent directors are present, consistent with Nasdaq
corporate governance requirements; however we are not required
under Marshall Islands law to maintain a majority independent
Board of Directors and we cannot guarantee that we will always
in the future maintain a Board of Directors with a majority of
independent members.
|
|
|
|
In lieu of obtaining shareholder approval prior to the issuance
of designated securities, we will comply with provisions of the
Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, which allows the
Board of Directors to approve share issuances.
|
|
|
|
As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to solicit
proxies or provide proxy statements to Nasdaq pursuant to Nasdaq
corporate governance rules or Marshall Islands law. Consistent
with Marshall Islands law and as provided in our bylaws, we will
notify our shareholders of meetings between 15 and 60 days
before the meeting. This notification will contain, among other
things, information regarding business to be transacted at the
meeting. In addition, our bylaws provide that shareholders must
give us between 150 and 180 days advance notice to properly
introduce any business at a meeting of shareholders.
|
Other than as noted above, we are in full compliance with all
other Nasdaq corporate governance standards applicable to
U.S. domestic issuers.
D-96
PART III
Item 17. Financial
Statements
See Item 18
Item 18. Financial
Statements
The following financial statements beginning on
page F-1
are filed as a part of this annual report.
Item 19. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company(1)
|
|
1
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company(2)
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of Share Certificate(3)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement dated
April 8, 2011, as amended(4)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement(5)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan(11)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with Nordea Bank Finland
Plc(6)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Amendatory Agreement to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with
Nordea Bank Finland Plc(7)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of TMS Management Agreement Drybulk Carrier
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of TMS Management Agreement Tanker
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement between OceanFreight Inc. and Haywood
Finance Limited dated April 1, 2011, relating to Amazon
Shareholders Limited
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement between OceanFreight Inc. and Haywood
Finance Limited dated April 1, 2011, relating to Pasifai
Shareholders Limited
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
12
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
13
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
13
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
15
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys report on
Form 6-K
filed on June 11, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys report on
Form 6-K
filed on June 19, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Amended Registration
Statement on
Form F-1/A
(Amendment No. 1) (File
No. 333-141958
) on April 18, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form 8-A/A
filed April 8, 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Amended Registration
Statement on
Form F-1/A
(Amendment No. 3) (File
No. 333-141958
) on April 20, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2007 on March 7, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys report on
Form 6-K
filed on February 2, 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys report on
Form 6-K
filed on February 13, 2009. |
|
(9) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys report on
Form 6-K
filed on July 24, 2009. |
|
(10) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2008 on March 23, 2009. |
|
(11) |
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2009 on March 9, 2010. |
D-97
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this
annual report on its behalf.
OceanFreight Inc.
(Registrant)
Antonis Kandylidis
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: April 14, 2011
D-98
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
DF-2
|
|
|
|
|
DF-3
|
|
|
|
|
DF-4
|
|
|
|
|
DF-5
|
|
|
|
|
DF-6
|
|
|
|
|
DF-7
|
|
|
|
|
DF-8
|
|
DF-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of OCEANFREIGHT INC.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
OceanFreight Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of OceanFreight Inc. at December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
OceanFreight Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated April 14, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors
Accountants S.A.
Athens, Greece
April 14, 2011
DF-2
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of OCEANFREIGHT INC.
We have audited OceanFreight Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). OceanFreight
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 15.b in the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, OceanFreight Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheets of OceanFreight Inc. as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010, of OceanFreight Inc. and our report
dated April 14, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors
Accountants S.A.
Athens, Greece
April 14, 2011
DF-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars-except for share and
per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
37,272
|
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
6,035
|
|
|
|
7,925
|
|
Vessels held for sale
|
|
|
51,080
|
|
|
|
88,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
100,299
|
|
|
|
109,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS, NET:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances for vessel acquisition
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels under construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,618
|
|
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation of $43,486 and $32,284,
respectively
|
|
|
423,242
|
|
|
|
311,144
|
|
Other fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $123 and
$382, respectively
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets, net
|
|
|
433,998
|
|
|
|
358,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing fees, net of accumulated amortization of
$2,378 and $2,916, respectively
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
6,511
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
7,102
|
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
549,272
|
|
|
$
|
478,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,053
|
|
|
$
|
2,161
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
16,693
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
7,443
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
Imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
49,947
|
|
|
|
82,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
73,328
|
|
|
|
111,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability, net of current portion
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
215,727
|
|
|
|
127,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
219,333
|
|
|
|
132,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, par value $0.01; 5,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares, par value $0.01; 333,333,333 shares
authorized, 52,816,667 and 83,266,655 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Subordinated Shares, par value $0.01; 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
458,757
|
|
|
|
499,758
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(203,730
|
)
|
|
|
(265,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
256,611
|
|
|
|
235,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
549,272
|
|
|
$
|
478,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
DF-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars-except for share and
per share data)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenue
|
|
$
|
147,116
|
|
|
$
|
118,462
|
|
|
$
|
100,632
|
|
Gain/(loss) on forward freight agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
Imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,318
|
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,434
|
|
|
|
133,505
|
|
|
|
97,848
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(14,275
|
)
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
(28,980
|
)
|
|
|
(43,915
|
)
|
|
|
(41,078
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
(8,540
|
)
|
|
|
(8,264
|
)
|
Survey and drydocking costs
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
(5,570
|
)
|
|
|
(1,784
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(43,658
|
)
|
|
|
(48,272
|
)
|
|
|
(24,853
|
)
|
Impairment on vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels and vessel held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,176
|
)
|
|
|
(62,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss )
|
|
|
60,658
|
|
|
|
(164,217
|
)
|
|
|
(46,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(16,528
|
)
|
|
|
(12,169
|
)
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
Loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(17,184
|
)
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
(8,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expenses)
|
|
|
(32,936
|
)
|
|
|
(14,465
|
)
|
|
|
(15,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
27,722
|
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
5.82
|
|
|
$
|
(6.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per subordinated share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
4,773,824
|
|
|
|
26,185,442
|
|
|
|
70,488,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of subordinated shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
DF-5
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
For
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Subordinated Shares
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars-except for share and
per share data)
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,131,360
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
2,063,158
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
218,346
|
|
|
$
|
(4,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
213,410
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
27,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
Proceeds from Controlled Equity Offering, net of
related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333,333
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,900
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,368
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
85,150
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
Cancellation of common and subordinated stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of subordinated stock to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702,068
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(2,106,203
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,772
|
)
|
|
|
(47,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
27,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181,498
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
271,947
|
|
|
$
|
(25,048
|
)
|
|
$
|
246,961
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
Proceeds from standby equity purchase and
distribution agreements, net of related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,635,169
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,288
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,816,667
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
459,813
|
|
|
$
|
(203,730
|
)
|
|
$
|
256,611
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Proceeds from equity Offering, net of related
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,716,654
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,242
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,066,667
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
Equity contribution, net of related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,666,667
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,266,655
|
|
|
$
|
833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
499,758
|
|
|
$
|
(265,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
235,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
DF-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss):
|
|
$
|
27,722
|
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
43,658
|
|
|
|
48,272
|
|
|
|
24,853
|
|
Amortization of financing costs
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
Amortization of imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
(10,318
|
)
|
|
|
(14,473
|
)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
Amortization of stock based compensation
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
(Gain)/Loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
16,147
|
|
|
|
(5,098
|
)
|
|
|
553
|
|
Impairment on vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels and vessel held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,176
|
|
|
|
62,929
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(1,847
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
|
(3,838
|
)
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
|
|
(6,149
|
)
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Due to/(from) related parties
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,822
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
(1,185
|
)
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
81,369
|
|
|
|
26,552
|
|
|
|
28,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances for vessels acquisition and vessels under construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,900
|
)
|
|
|
(46,618
|
)
|
Additions to vessel cost (excluding sellers credit)
|
|
|
(120,537
|
)
|
|
|
(180,501
|
)
|
|
|
(40,196
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sale of vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,404
|
|
|
|
44,136
|
|
Other fixed assets
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(120,665
|
)
|
|
|
(130,786
|
)
|
|
|
(42,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity offerings and contributions, net of related
costs
|
|
|
50,900
|
|
|
|
188,288
|
|
|
|
39,186
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
63,400
|
|
|
|
29,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(16,000
|
)
|
|
|
(71,889
|
)
|
|
|
(55,902
|
)
|
Repayment of sellers credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
(47,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(6,511
|
)
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by/(used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
43,321
|
|
|
|
118,437
|
|
|
|
(13,494
|
)
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
14,203
|
|
|
|
(27,723
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
23,069
|
|
|
|
37,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
23,069
|
|
|
$
|
37,272
|
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
11,044
|
|
|
$
|
13,339
|
|
|
$
|
7,175
|
|
Sellers credit
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
DF-7
|
|
1.
|
Basis
of Presentation and General Information:
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of OceanFreight Inc. (OceanFreight) and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company). OceanFreight was incorporated on
September 11, 2006 under the laws of the Marshall Islands.
In late April 2007, OceanFreight completed its Initial Public
Offering in the United States under the United States
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the net proceeds of which
amounted to $216,794. The Companys common shares are
listed on the Nasdaq Global Market.
The Company is engaged in the marine transportation of drybulk
and crude oil cargoes through the ownership and operation of
drybulk and tanker vessels. Effective May 2009, the Company is
also engaged in Forward Freight Agreements (FFA) trading
activities.
On May 28, 2010, Basset Holding Inc. (Basset),
a company controlled by Mr. Antonis Kandylidis, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer, made an equity
contribution of $20,000 in exchange of 16,666,667 (50,000,000
before the reverse stock split) of the Companys common
shares Note 8(f).
On June 10, 2010, the Companys stockholders approved
a 3:1 reverse stock split, pursuant to which every three shares,
of the Companys common stock issued and outstanding were
converted into one share of common stock. The reverse stock
split took effect as of the start of trading on the NASDAQ Stock
Market on June 17, 2010 and reduced the number of the then
issued and outstanding common shares from 231,800,001 common
shares to 77,266,655 common shares. Accordingly, all share and
per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect
this change in capital structure discussed in Note 8(g)
On June 15, 2010, the technical and commercial management
of the drybulk and the tanker fleets as well as the supervision
of the construction of the three newbuildings Very Large Ore
Carriers (VLOCs) were contracted under separate
management agreements to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd.,
respectively, both related technical and commercial management
companies (Note 3). Until June 15, 2010, the technical
and commercial management of the Companys fleet was
contracted under separate management agreements to Cardiff
Marine Inc. (Cardiff), a related technical and
commercial management company (Note 3). Until July 2009,
the technical management of the drybulk carriers was performed
by Wallem Ship Management Ltd. (Wallem) and the
technical management of the tanker vessels and the commercial
management of all vessels were performed by Cardiff.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company is the ultimate owner
of all outstanding shares of the following shipowning
subsidiaries, each of which is domiciled in the Republic of the
Marshall Islands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Deadweight Tonnage
|
|
|
YearBuilt
|
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
|
|
|
(In metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries established in the Republic of Marshall
Islands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceanship Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Trenton
|
|
|
75,229
|
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
June 4, 2007
|
Oceanventure Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Austin
|
|
|
75,229
|
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
June 6, 2007
|
Oceanenergy Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Helena
|
|
|
73,744
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
July 30, 2007
|
Oceantrade Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Topeka
|
|
|
74,710
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
August 2, 2007
|
Kifissia Star Owners Inc.
|
|
M/V Augusta
|
|
|
69,053
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
December 17, 2007
|
Oceanfighter Owners Inc.
|
|
M/T Olinda
|
|
|
149,085
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
January 17, 2008
|
Ocean Blue Spirit Owners Inc.
|
|
M/T Tamara
|
|
|
95,793
|
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
October 17, 2008
|
Oceanwave Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Partagas
|
|
|
173,880
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
July 30, 2009
|
Oceanrunner Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Robusto
|
|
|
173,949
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
October 19, 2009
|
Oceanfire Owners Inc.
|
|
M/V Cohiba
|
|
|
174,200
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
December 9, 2009
|
Oceanpower Owners Inc.
|
|
M/V Montecristo
|
|
|
180,263
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 28, 2010
|
Oceanview Owners Limited(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceansurf Owners Limited(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceancentury Owners Limited(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freightwise Investments Ltd(ii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DF-8
|
|
|
|
Companies with vessels sold
|
|
|
Oceanstrength Owners Limited
|
|
Owner of
M/V Lansing
sold on July 1, 2009
|
Oceanprime Owners Limited
|
|
Owner of
M/V Richmond
sold on September 30, 2009
|
Oceanresources Owners Limited
|
|
Owner of
M/V Juneau
sold on October 23, 2009
|
Oceanwealth Owners Limited
|
|
Owner of
M/V Pierre
sold on April 14, 2010
|
Ocean Faith Owners Inc.
|
|
Owner of
M/T Tigani
sold on May 4, 2010
|
Oceanclarity Owners Limited
|
|
Owner of
M/T Pink
Sands sold on November 4, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries established in the republic of Liberia
|
|
|
Oceanview Owners Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#1
|
Oceansurf Owners Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#2
|
Oceancentury Owners Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#3
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Subsidiaries established for Companys general purposes. |
|
(ii) |
|
Freightwise Investments Ltd was established in 2009 to engage in
Freight Forward Agreements (FFA) trading activities
Note 10. |
Voyage revenues for 2008, 2009 and 2010 included revenues
derived from the following significant charterers (in
percentages of total voyage revenues):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
Charterer
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
(Note 15)
|
|
A
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
B
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
C
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
D
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies:
|
(a) Principles of Consolidation: The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and include the accounts of OceanFreight
Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries referred to in
Note 1 above. All significant inter-company balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
(b) Use of Estimates: The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Foreign Currency Translation: The
functional currency of the Company is the U.S. Dollar
because the Company operates in international shipping markets,
and therefore primarily transacts business in U.S. Dollars.
The Companys accounting records are maintained in
U.S. Dollars. Transactions involving other currencies
during the periods presented are converted into
U.S. Dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the time
of the transactions. At the balance sheet date, monetary assets
and liabilities, which are denominated in other currencies, are
translated into U.S. Dollars at the period-end exchange
rates. Resulting translation gains or losses are included in
General and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
DF-9
(d) Concentration of Credit
Risk: Financial instruments, which potentially
subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit
risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade
accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash
equivalents, consisting mostly of deposits, with qualified
financial institutions with high creditworthiness. The Company
performs periodic evaluations of the relative creditworthiness
of those financial institutions that are considered in the
Companys investment strategy. The Company limits its
credit risk with accounts receivable by performing ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers financial condition
and generally does not require collateral for its accounts
receivable.
(e) Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted
Cash: The Company considers highly liquid
investments such as time deposits and certificates of deposit
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Restricted cash concerns funds deposited in
retention accounts for the payment of loan installments and
minimum liquidity requirements under the loan facilities.
(f) Receivables: The amount shown as
receivables, at each balance sheet date, includes receivables
from charterers for hire, freight and demurrage billings, net of
a provision for doubtful accounts, if any. At each balance sheet
date, all potentially uncollectible accounts are assessed
individually for purposes of determining the appropriate
provision for doubtful accounts. There were no doubtful
receivables for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
(g) Inventories: Inventories consist of
consumable bunkers and lubricants which are stated at the lower
of cost or market value. Cost is determined by the first
in-first out method.
(h) Insurance Claims: The Company records
insurance claim recoveries for insured losses incurred on damage
to fixed assets and for insured crew medical expenses. Insurance
claim recoveries are recorded, net of any deductible amounts, at
the time the Companys fixed assets suffer insured damages
or when crew medical expenses are incurred, recovery is probable
under the related insurance policies, and the Company makes an
estimate of the amount to be reimbursed following the insurance
claim.
(i) Vessels Under Construction: This
represents amounts expended by the Company in accordance with
the terms of the related shipbuilding contracts. Interest costs
incurred during the construction period (until the asset is
complete and ready for its intended use) are capitalized.
Capitalized interest for the year ended December 31, 2010
amounted to $964.
(j) Vessels, Net: Vessels are stated at
cost, which consists of the contract price and any material
expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition (initial
repairs, improvements, delivery expenses and other expenditures
to prepare the vessel for her initial voyage as well as
professional fees directly associated with the vessel
acquisition). Subsequent expenditures for major improvements are
also capitalized when they appreciably extend the life, increase
the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety of the
vessels; otherwise, these amounts are charged to expense as
incurred.
The cost of each of the Companys vessels is depreciated
from the date of its acquisition on a straight-line basis during
the vessels remaining economic useful life, after
considering the estimated residual value (vessels residual
value is equal to the product of its lightweight tonnage and
estimated scrap rate of $200 per lwt). Management estimates the
useful life of the Companys vessels to be 25 years
from the date of initial delivery from the shipyard. When
regulations place limitations over the ability of a vessel to
trade on a worldwide basis, its remaining useful life is
adjusted at the date such regulations are adopted.
(k) Vessels Held for Sale: It is the
Companys policy to dispose of vessels and other fixed
assets when suitable opportunities arise and not necessarily to
keep them until the end of their useful life. The Company
classifies assets and disposal groups as being held for sale in
accordance with the ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment,
when the following criteria are met: (i) management
possessing the necessary authority has committed to a plan to
sell the asset (disposal group); (ii) the asset (disposal
group) is immediately available for sale on an as is
basis; (iii) an active program to find the buyer and other
actions required to execute the plan to sell the asset (disposal
group) have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset
(disposal group) is probable, and transfer of the asset
(disposal group) is expected to qualify for recognition as a
completed sale within one year; and (v) the asset (disposal
group) is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is
reasonable in relation to its current fair value and actions
required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that
significant changes to the plan will be made
DF-10
or that the plan will be withdrawn. Long-lived assets or
disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the
lower of their carrying amount or fair value. These assets are
not depreciated once they meet the criteria to be held for sale
and are classified in current assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet.
(l) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: The
Company uses ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, which
addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment
or disposal of long-lived assets. The standard requires that
long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and
used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the assets may not be recoverable. When the estimate of
undiscounted projected net operating cash flows, excluding
interest charges, expected to be generated by the use of the
asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company evaluates
the asset for an impairment loss.
Carrying values of Companys vessels may not represent
their fair market value at any point in time since the market
prices of second hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in
charter rates and the cost of newbuildings. Historically, both
charter rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical. The Company
records impairment losses only when events occur that cause the
Company to believe that future cash flows for any individual
vessel will be less than its carrying value. The carrying
amounts of vessels held and used by the Company are reviewed for
potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of a particular vessel may not
be fully recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge
would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future
cash flows expected to result from the use of the vessel and its
eventual disposition is less than the vessels carrying
amount. This assessment is made at the individual vessel level
as separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel
is available. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the
fair value of the asset.
The Company determines undiscounted projected net operating cash
flows for each vessel and compares it to the vessels
carrying value. In developing estimates of future cash flows,
the Company must make assumptions about future charter rates,
vessel operating expenses, fleet utilization, and the estimated
remaining useful lives of the vessels. These assumptions are
based on historical trends as well as future expectations. The
projected net operating cash flows are determined by considering
the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed
fleet days and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for
the unfixed days (based on the most recent 10 year
historical average of the six month, one year and three year
time charter rates for drybulk vessels, the three year projected
time charter rate for the first three years and the 10 year
historical average of the one year and three year time charter
rates thereafter for the Suezmax tanker vessel), over the
remaining estimated life of each vessel assuming an annual
growth rate of 3.0%, net of brokerage commission for drybulk
vessels and no growth rate for the tanker vessels. Expected
outflows for scheduled vessels maintenance and vessel
operating expenses are based on historical data, and adjusted
annually assuming an average annual inflation rate of 3%.
Effective fleet utilization is assumed to be 99% and 97% for
drybulk carriers and tanker vessels, respectively, taking into
account the period(s) each vessel is expected to undergo her
scheduled maintenance (drydocking and special surveys), as well
as an estimate of 1% off hire days each year for drybulk
carriers and 3% for tanker vessels. The Company has assumed no
change in the remaining estimated useful lives of the current
fleet, and scrap values based on $200 per lwt at disposal.
In 2010 and 2009, the Company in assessing its exposure to
impairment risks for its fleet, has considered the current
conditions of the of international drybulk and tanker industry,
the decline of the market values, the deterioration of the
charter hires and the expected slow recovery of the market, the
age of its tanker vessels and the increased costs for their
maintenance and upgrading. As a result it has determined that
the utilization of its tanker vessels over their remaining
useful lives has been negatively impacted by the market
conditions with low possibilities for recovery and, accordingly,
has decided to write down two of its tanker vessels to their
market values by recording an impairment charge of $52,700 in
its 2009 consolidated financial statements (Note 6). No
impairment loss was identified or recorded for 2008 or 2010 and
the Company has not identified any other facts or circumstances
that would require the write down of vessel values.
The current assumptions used and the estimates made are highly
subjective, and could be negatively impacted by further
significant deterioration in charter rates or vessel utilization
over the remaining life of the vessels which could require the
Company to record a material impairment charge in future periods.
DF-11
(m) Accounting for Survey and Drydocking
Costs: Special survey and drydocking costs are
expensed in the period they are incurred.
(n) Financing Costs: Costs associated
with new loans or refinancing of existing ones including fees
paid to lenders or required to be paid to third parties on the
lenders behalf for obtaining new loans or refinancing
existing ones are recorded as deferred charges. Such fees are
deferred and amortized to interest and finance costs during the
life of the related debt using the effective interest method.
Unamortized fees relating to loans repaid or refinanced, meeting
the criteria of debt extinguishment, are expensed in the period
the repayment or refinancing is made.
(o) Imputed Prepaid/Deferred Revenue: The
Company records identified assets or liabilities associated with
the acquisition of a vessel at fair value, determined by
reference to market data. We value any asset or liability
arising from the market value of assumed time charters as a
condition of the original purchase of a vessel at the date when
such vessel is initially deployed on its charter. The value of
the asset or liability is based on the difference between the
current fair value of a charter with similar characteristics as
the time charter assumed and the net present value of
contractual cash flows of the time charter assumed, to the
extent the vessel capitalized cost does not exceed its fair
value without a time charter contract. When the present value of
contractual cash flows of the time charter assumed is greater
than its current fair value, the difference is recorded as
imputed prepaid revenue. When the opposite situation occurs, the
difference is recorded as imputed deferred revenue. Such assets
and liabilities are amortized as a reduction of, or an increase
in, revenue respectively, during the period of the time charter
assumed. In developing estimates of the net present value of
contractual cash flows of the time charters assumed we must make
assumptions about the discount rate that reflect the risks
associated with the assumed time charter and the fair value of
the assumed time charter at the time the vessel is acquired.
Although management believes that the assumptions used to
evaluate present and fair values discussed above are reasonable
and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective.
(p) Accounting for Voyage Revenue: The
Company generates its revenues from charterers for the charter
hire of its vessels. Vessels are chartered using either voyage
charters, where a contract is made in the spot market for the
use of a vessel for a specific voyage for a specified charter
rate, or timecharters, where a contract is entered into for the
use of a vessel for a specific period of time and a specified
daily charter hire rate. If a charter agreement exists and
collection of the related revenue is reasonably assured, revenue
is recognized as it is earned ratably during the duration of the
period of each voyage or timecharter. A voyage is deemed to
commence upon the completion of discharge of the vessels
previous cargo and is deemed to end upon the completion of
discharge of the current cargo. Demurrage income represents
payments by a charterer to a vessel owner when loading or
discharging time exceeds the stipulated time in the voyage
charter and is recognized ratably as earned during the related
voyage charters duration period. Unearned revenue includes
cash received prior to the balance sheet date and is related to
revenue earned after such date. For vessels operating in pooling
arrangements, the Company earns a portion of total revenues
generated by the pool, net of expenses incurred by the pool. The
amount allocated to each pool participant vessel, including the
Companys vessels, is determined in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula, which is determined by points awarded to each vessel in
the pool based on the vessels age, design and other
performance characteristics. Revenue under pooling arrangements
is accounted for on the accrual basis and is recognized when an
agreement with the pool exists, price is fixed, service is
provided and collectability has been reasonably assured. The
allocation of such net revenue may be subject to future
adjustments by the pool; however historically such changes have
not been material.
Revenue is based on contracted charter parties and although the
Companys business is with customers who are believed to be
of the highest standard, there is always the possibility of
dispute over the terms. In such circumstances, the Company will
assess the recoverability of amounts outstanding and a provision
is estimated if there is a possibility of non-recoverability.
Although the Company may believe that its provisions are based
on fair judgment at the time of their creation, it is possible
that an amount under dispute will not be recovered and the
estimated provision of doubtful accounts would be inadequate. If
any of our revenues become uncollectible these amounts would be
written-off at that time.
(q) Accounting for Voyage Expenses and Vessel Operating
Expenses: Voyage related and vessel operating
expenses are expensed as incurred. Under a time charter,
specified voyage expenses, such as fuel and port charges are
paid by the charterer and other non-specified voyage expenses,
such as commissions, are paid by the Company.
DF-12
Vessel operating expenses including vessel management fees,
crews, maintenance and insurance are paid by the Company. Under
a bareboat charter, the charterer assumes responsibility for all
voyage and vessel operating expenses and risk of operation.
For vessels employed on spot market voyage charters, we incur
voyage expenses that include port and canal charges and bunker
expenses, unlike under time charter employment, where such
expenses are assumed by the charterers.
As is common in the drybulk and crude oil shipping industries,
we pay commissions ranging from 1.25% to 6.25% of the total
daily charter hire rate of each charter to ship brokers
associated with the charterers. Commissions are deferred and
amortized over the related voyage charter period to the extend
revenue has been deferred since commissions are earned as the
Companys revenues are earned.
(r) Earnings/(loss) per Common
Share: Basic earnings (loss) per common share is
computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the year. Diluted earnings (losses) per common share reflect the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised. In June 2010,
the Company effected a 3:1 reverse stock split (Note 8(g)).
(s) Accounting for Financial
Instruments: ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging,
requires all derivative contracts to be recorded at fair value,
as determined in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. The changes in fair value of
the derivative contract are recognized in earnings unless
specific hedging criteria are met. The Companys derivative
contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore changes
in fair value have been accounted for as increases or decreases
to earnings.
(t) Segment Reporting: ASC 280, Segment
Reporting, requires descriptive information about its reportable
operating segments. Operating segments, as defined, are
components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. The Company reports
financial information and evaluates its operations and operating
results by type of vessel and not by the length or type of ship
employment for its customers. The Company does not use discrete
financial information to evaluate the operating results for each
such type of charter. Although revenue can be identified for
different types of charters or for charters with different
duration, management cannot and does not identify expenses,
profitability or other financial information for these charters.
Furthermore, when the Company charters a vessel to a charterer,
the charterer is free to trade the vessel worldwide and, as a
result, the disclosure of geographic information is
impracticable. The reportable segments of the company are the
tankers segment and the drybulk carriers segment.
(u) Stock Based Compensation: In addition
to cash compensation, the Company provides for the grant of
restricted and subordinated shares to key employees. In
accordance with ASC 718, Compensation Stock
Compensation, the Company measures the cost of employee services
received in exchange for these awards based on the fair value of
the Companys shares at the grant date (measurement date).
The cost is recognized over the requisite service period, or
vesting period. If these equity awards are modified after the
grant date, incremental compensation cost is recognized in an
amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified
award over the fair value of the original award immediately
before the modification.
(v) Income taxation: The Company is not
liable for any income tax on its income derived from shipping
operations. Instead, a tax is levied based on the tonnage of the
vessels, which is included in vessel operating expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company
anticipates its income will continue to be exempt in the future,
including U.S. federal income tax. However, in the future,
the Company may not continue to satisfy certain criteria in the
U.S. tax laws and as such, may become subject to
U.S. federal income tax on future U.S. source shipping
income.
(w) Commitments and
Contingencies: Commitments are recognized when
the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a
result of past events and it is probable that an outflow of
resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle
this obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of the
obligation can be made. Provisions are reviewed at each balance
sheet date.
DF-13
(x) New Accounting Pronouncements:
In January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820):
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The
updated guidance requires new disclosures to separately disclose
the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1
and 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the
transfers; and in the reconciliation for fair value measurements
using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a
reporting entity should present separately information about
purchases, sales, issuances, settlements. The updated guidance
also clarifies existing disclosures related to the level of
disaggregation, and disclosures about inputs and valuation
techniques. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing
disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods
with those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not
have any impact on Companys financial position or results
of operations.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-09,
Subsequent Events (Topic 855). ASU
2010-09
amends ASC 855 to clarify which entities are required to
evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial
statements are issued and the scope of the disclosure
requirements related to subsequent events. The amendments remove
the requirement for a SEC filer to disclose the date through
which management evaluated subsequent events in both issued and
revised financial statements. Revised financial statements
include financial statements revised as a result of either
correction of an error or retrospective application of
U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the FASB has clarified that if the
financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is
not a SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial
statements were issued or available to be issued and the date
the revised financial statements were issued or available to be
issued. Those amendments remove potential conflicts with the
SECs literature. All of the amendments in this update are
effective upon its issuance, except for the use of the issued
date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The
adoption of the above amendments of ASU
2010-09 did
not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-20,
Receivables (topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit
Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses. The updated guidance requires entities to provide
extensive new disclosures about their financing receivables,
including credit risk exposures and the allowance for credit
losses and the quality of financing receivables. The amendments
in this update enhance disclosures about the credit quality of
financing receivables and the allowance from credit losses.
Entities with financing receivables will be required to
disclose, among other things: (a) a roll forward of the
allowance for credit losses, (b) credit quality information
such as credit risk scores or external credit agency ratings,
(c) impaired loan information, (d) modification
information and (d) non accrual and past due information.
Trade receivables with maturities of one year or less that arose
from sales of goods or services are excluded from the scope of
the new disclosures. For public entities, the enhanced
disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The
disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period
are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this
guidance will not have any impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
|
|
3.
|
Transactions
with Related Parties:
|
(a) TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers
Ltd.: Following termination of the management
agreements with Cardiff discussed in Note 3(b), effective
June 15, 2010, the Company contracted the technical and
commercial management of its drybulk and tanker fleet as well as
the supervision of the construction of the newbuildings to TMS
Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. (the Managers). Both
companies are beneficially owned (a) 30% by a company the
beneficial owner of which is Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis,
the mother of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
(b) 70% by a foundation controlled by Mr. George
Economou. Mrs. C. Kandylidis is also the sister of
Mr. G. Economou and the wife of one of the Companys
directors, Mr. Konstandinos Kandylidis.
The Managers are engaged under separate vessel management
agreements directly by the Companys respective
wholly-owned vessel owning subsidiaries. Under the vessel
management agreements the Company pays a daily management fee
per vessel, covering also superintendents fee per vessel
plus expenses for any services
DF-14
performed relating to evaluation of the vessels physical
condition, supervision of shipboard activities or attendance
upon repairs and drydockings. At the beginning of each calendar
year, these fees are adjusted upwards according to the Greek
consumer price index. Such increase cannot be less than 3% nor
more than 5%. In the event that the management agreement is
terminated for any reason other than Managers default, the
Company will be required (a) to pay management fees for a
further period of three (3) calendar months as from the
date of termination and (b) to pay an equitable proportion
of any severance crew costs which materialize as per applicable
Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). In this respect, the
Company will have to pay approximately $942 due to the sale of
M/T Tamara
and
M/V Augusta
in January 2011 and the expected sale of
M/T Olinda,
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton
(Note 4).
The Managers, for the services discussed above, are entitled to
a daily management fee per vessel of 1,500 ($2.0 based on
the exchange rate of December 31, 2010) and
1,700 ($2.3 based on the exchange rate of
December 31, 2010) for the drybulk carriers and tanker
vessels, respectively. The Managers are also entitled to
(a) a discretionary incentive fee, (b) extra
superintendents fee of 500 ($0.7 based on the
exchange rate of December 31, 2010) per day (c) a
commission of 1.25% on charter hire agreements that are arranged
by the Managers and (d) a commission of 1% of the purchase
price on sales or purchases of vessels in the Companys
fleet that are arranged by the Managers. Furthermore, the
Managers are entitled to a supervision fee payable upfront for
vessels under construction equal to 10% of the approved annual
budget for supervision cost.
Furthermore, based on the management agreements, as of
December 31, 2010, the Company made a security payment of
$4,137 to TMS Dry Ltd. representing managed vessels
estimated operating expenses, including management fees, for
three months which will be settled when the agreements
terminate; however, in case of a change of control the amount of
the security is not refundable. The amount has been classified
under Other non-current assets in the accompanying
2010 consolidated balance sheet.
The fees charged by TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. during the
period from June 15, 2010 to December 31, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TMS
|
|
|
|
|
TMS
|
|
Tankers
|
|
|
Nature of Charge
|
|
Dry LTD
|
|
Ltd
|
|
Included in
|
|
Management fees
|
|
$
|
3,496
|
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Commission on charter hire agreements
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
Voyage expenses Statement of Operations
|
Commissions on acquisition of vessels
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, net Balance Sheet
|
Commissions on sale of vessels
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels Statement of Operations
|
Termination fees
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels Statement of Operations
|
Supervision fee on vessels under construction
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fixed assets, net Balance Sheet
|
At December 31, 2010, $1,434 and $433 is payable to TMS Dry
Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd., respectively, and are reflected in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as Due to
related parties. In addition, as at December 31,
2010, $1,092 and $1,908 due from TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers
Ltd. respectively, relating to the security payment as discussed
above and the operations of the vessels under TMS Dry Ltd. and
TMS Tankers Ltd. management are included in Prepayments
and other, in the accompanying 2010 consolidated balance
sheet.
(b) Cardiff Marine Inc.
(Cardiff): Until June 15, 2010,
the Company used the services of Cardiff, a ship management
company with offices in Greece, for the technical and commercial
management of the Companys fleet. The issued and
outstanding capital stock of Cardiff is beneficially owned
(a) 30% by a company the beneficial owner of which is
Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis, the mother of the
Companys CEO and (b) 70% by a foundation controlled
by Mr. George Economou. Mrs. C. Kandylidis is the
sister of Mr. G. Economou and the wife of one of the
Companys directors, Mr. Konstantinos Kandylidis.
DF-15
Prior to June 15, 2010, Cardiff was engaged under separate
vessel management agreements directly by the Companys
respective wholly owned vessel owning subsidiaries. Under the
vessel management agreements Cardiff was entitled to a daily
management fee per vessel of 764 ($1.0) and 870
($1.2) for the drybulk carriers and tanker vessels,
respectively. Cardiff also provided, other services pursuant to
a services agreement, which was terminated on June 15,
2010, under which the Company paid additional fees, including
(1) a financing fee of 0.2% of the amount of any loan,
credit facility, interest rate swap agreement, foreign currency
contract and forward exchange contract arranged by Cardiff,
(2) a commission of 1% of the purchase price on sales or
purchases of vessels in the Companys fleet that are
arranged by Cardiff, (3) a commission of 1.25% of charter
hire agreements arranged by Cardiff, (4) an information
technology fee of 26,363 ($34.9) per quarter and
(5) a fee of 527 ($0.7) per day for superintendent
inspection services in connection with the possible purchase of
a vessel. The U.S. $ figures above are based on the
exchange rate at December 31, 2010. At the beginning of
each calendar year, these fees were adjusted upwards according
to the Greek consumer price index. The Company was also
reimbursing Cardiff for any
out-of-pocket
expenses at cost plus 10%.
In May 2009, the Company entered into a service agreement with
Cardiff whereby Cardiff is entitled to a 0.15% brokerage
commission on the Companys FFA trading transactions. The
agreement was terminated on June 15, 2010.
Until July 2009, when Cardiff assumed the management of all of
the Companys vessels, Cardiff was providing supervisory
services for the vessels whose technical manager was Wallem Ship
Management Ltd. in exchange for a daily fee of 105 ($0.14
based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2010) per
vessel.
Furthermore, based on the management agreements with Cardiff the
Company, as of June 15, 2010, had made a security payment
of $6,486, representing managed vessels estimated
operating expenses, including management fees, for three months.
Following the termination of the agreements on June 15,
2010, the security payment was reimbursed to the Company in
September 2010.
DF-16
The fees charged by Cardiff for 2008, 2009 and 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of Charge
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Included in
|
|
Management fees
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
4,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,275
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Commission on charter hire agreements
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
Voyage expenses Statement of Operations
|
Commission on FFA trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) on forward freight agreements Statement
of Operations
|
Commission on vessels under construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Vessels under construction Balance Sheet
|
Commissions on purchase of vessels
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, net Balance Sheet
|
Commissions on sale of vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels Statement of Operations
|
Financing fees
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs Statement of Operations
|
IT related fees
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fixed assets, net Balance Sheet
|
IT related fees
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Financing fees
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing fees, net Balance Sheet
|
Legal Attendance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Mark up on reimbursement of out of pocket expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
At December 31, 2009 and 2010, $785 and $0, respectively,
were payable to Cardiff, and are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as Due to related
parties. In addition, $344 due from and $279 due to
Cardiff as at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively,
relating to the operations of the vessels under Cardiffs
management, are included in Prepayments and other
and Accounts Payable, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(c) Vivid Finance Limited
(Vivid): On August 13, 2010, the
Company entered into a consultancy agreement (the
Agreement) with Vivid, a related company organized
under the laws of Cyprus, which is controlled by Mr. George
Economou and of which he may be deemed the beneficial owner.
Vivid serves as the Companys financial consultant on
matters related to (i) new loans and credit facilities with
lenders and financial institutions, (ii) the raising of
equity or debt from capital markets, (iii) interest rate
swaps agreements, foreign currency contracts and forward
exchange contracts and (iv) the renegotiation of existing
loans and credit facilities. In consideration of these services
the Company will pay Vivid a fee of 0.20% on the total
transaction amount. Vivid did not provide any services in 2010
and, accordingly, no fees were billed to the Company.
The agreement has a duration of five years and may be terminated
(i) at the end of its term unless extended by mutual
agreement of the parties; (ii) at any time by the mutual
agreement of the parties; and (iii) by the Company after
providing written notice to Vivid at least 30 days prior to
the actual termination date. As defined in the Agreement, in the
event of a Change of Control Vivid has the option to
terminate the Agreement and cease providing the aforementioned
service within three months from the Change of
Control.
(d) Transbulk 1904 AB
(Transbulk): The vessel
M/V Richmond
was employed on a time charter with Transbulk for a period of 24
to 28 months at gross charter rate of $29.1 per day. On
August 1, 2009, the vessel was redelivered to the Company
due to early termination of the charter party. The vessel
M/V Lansing
was employed
DF-17
under a time charter with Transbulk until June 29, 2009
(the vessel was sold on July 1, 2009) at a gross
charter hire of $24 per day. Transbulk is a company based in
Gothenburg, Sweden. Transbulk has been in the drybulk cargo
chartering business for a period of approximately 30 years.
Mr. George Economou serves on its Board of Directors.
(e) Heidmar Trading LLC (Heidmar
Trading): On October 14, 2008, the
M/T Tigani
commenced her time charter employment with Heidmar Trading
LLC, for a period of approximately one year at a gross daily
rate of $29.8 and it was redelivered to the Company in December
2009. Mr. George Economou is the chairman of the Board of
Directors of the company and the Companys Chief Executive
Officer is a member of its Board of Directors. The vessel was
redelivered on December 22, 2009.
(f) Tri-Ocean Heidmar Tankers LLC(Tri-Ocean
Heidmar): On October 17, 2008, the
M/T Tamara,
concurrently with her delivery commenced her time charter
employment with Tri-Ocean Heidmar Tankers LLC for a period of
approximately 25 to 29 months at a gross daily rate of $27.
Tri-Ocean Heidmar Tankers LLC is owned by Heidmar Inc.
Mr. George Economou is the chairman of the Board of
Directors of Heidmar Inc. and the Companys Chief Executive
Officer is a member of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc.
The vessel was redelivered on November 6, 2010. At
December 31, 2010, $998 and $123 are due to the Tri-Ocean
Heidmar and are included in Accounts Payable and
Accrued Liabilities in the accompanying
December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet.
(g) Blue Fin Tankers Inc. pool (Blue
Fin): On October 29, 2008 the
M/T Olinda
was employed in the Blue Fin tankers spot pool for a minimum
period of twelve months. Blue Fin is a spot market pool managed
by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George Economou is the chairman of the
Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. and the Companys Chief
Executive Officer is a member of the Board of Directors of
Heidmar Inc. The vessel, as a pool participant, is allocated
part of the pools revenues and voyage expenses, on a time
charter basis, in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula. In October 2008, the Company made an initial advance to
the pool for working capital purposes of $928.4. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2010 the Company had a receivable
from the pool, including advances made to the pool for working
capital purposes, of $1,856 (of which $63 is included in
receivables and $1,793 is included in Prepayments and
other) and $2,198 (of which $63 is included in
Receivables and $2,135 is included in
Prepayments and other), respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The revenue of
M/V Olinda
deriving from the pool amounted to $2,627, $8,021 and 7,172
for 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively and is included in
Voyage revenue in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
(h) Sigma Tanker Pool
(Sigma): On December 22, 2009
and November 6, 2010, the
M/T Tigani
and the
M/T Tamara
were both employed in the Sigma Tankers Inc. pool for a
minimum period of twelve months. Sigma is a spot market pool
managed by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George Economou is the chairman
of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. and the Companys
Chief Executive Officer is a member of the Board of Directors of
Heidmar Inc. The vessels, as pool participants, are allocated
part of the pools revenues and voyage expenses, on a time
charter basis, in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula. The vessels were redelivered from the Pool on
April 28, 2010 and January 6, 2011, respectively, due
to their sale on May 4, 2010 and January 13, 2011,
respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Company
had a receivable from the pool of $933 and $1,480, respectively,
which is included in Receivables in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. The revenue of the
M/T Tigani
and the
M/T Tamara
deriving from the pool for 2009 amounted to $178 and nil,
respectively, and for 2010 to $2,000 and $651, respectively, and
is included in Voyage revenue in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
(i) Acquisition of Vessels: In October
2008, the Company took delivery of the tanker vessels
M/T Tigani
and
M/T Tamara
from interests associated with Mr. George Economou for an
aggregate consideration of $79,000. The purchase price was
financed by a sellers unsecured credit of $25,000 ($12,000
for the
M/T Tamara
and $13,000 for the
M/T Tigani)
and the Companys own funds. The sellers credit was
payable 18 months after the physical delivery of the vessel
and bore interest at 9.0% per annum for the amount relating to
the
M/T Tamara
and 9.5% per annum for the amount relating to the
M/T Tigani.
The total interest charged in this respect for 2008 and 2009
amounted to $500 and $639, respectively and is included in
Interest and finance costs in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. The Company also paid
Cardiff $1,440 representing a 1% commission on the vessels
purchase price.
As provided in the Memorandum of Agreements, or MOA, of
M/T Tigani
and
M/T Tamara,
following the resignation of one of the Companys
directors on November 25, 2008, the sellers of the vessels
had the right to demand the immediate payment of the
Sellers Credit of $25,000. The sellers of the above
vessels on December 9,
DF-18
2008, waived their contractual right to demand prompt prepayment
of the Sellers Credit until the amendment of the Nordea
credit facility became effective (the Amendatory
Agreement). On February 6, 2009, following the
effectiveness of the Amendatory Agreement with Nordea, the
sellers of the
M/T Tigani
and
M/T Tamara
exercised their option and requested the repayment of the
sellers credit to be made in cash from the proceeds of the
Standby Equity Purchase Agreement discussed in Note 8 as
also provided in the Amendatory Agreement, and waived their
option for the settlement of the Sellers Credit of $25,000
in the form of the Companys common stock at any date,
effective December 9, 2008. As of December 31, 2009,
the Company had fully repaid the Sellers Credit.
(j) Lease agreement: The Company has
leased office space in Athens, Greece, from Mr. George
Economou. The lease commenced on April 24, 2007, with a
duration of six months and the option for the Company to extend
it for another six months. The monthly rental amounts to
Euro 680 ($0.90 at the December 31, 2010 exchange
rate). This agreement was terminated on December 31, 2010.
The rent charged for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2009 and 2010 amounted to $12.1, $11.4 and $11.0, respectively
and is included in General and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
(k) Capital infusion: On May 28,
2010, Basset Holding Inc., a company controlled by
Mr. Anthony Kandylidis, made an equity contribution of
$20,000 in exchange for approximately 16,666,667 (50,000,000
common shares at $0.40 per share before the reverse stock split
effect discussed in Note 8(f)) of the Companys common
shares .
(l) Steel Wheel Investments
Limited.: Under an agreement between the Company
and Steel Wheel Investments Limited (Steel Wheel), a
company controlled by the Companys Chief Executive
Officer, Steel Wheel provides consulting services to the Company
in connection with the duties of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, for an annual fee plus a discretional cash bonus as
approved by the Compensation Committee. Such fees and bonuses
for 2008, 2009 and 2010 totaled $2,601, $3,987 and $3,837,
respectively and are included in General and
administrative expenses, in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Furthermore, as further discussed in
Note 11, in 2008 and 2010 certain compensation in stock was
granted to Steel Wheel.
|
|
4.
|
Vessels
held for sale:
|
The Company has contracted to sell, on a charter free basis, the
M/T Olinda,
the
M/T Tamara,
the
M/V Augusta,
the
M/V Austin
and the
M/V Trenton
for an aggregate price of $89,600. The
M/V Augusta
was delivered to its new owners on January 6, 2011 and
the
M/T Tamara
on January 13, 2011. The Company has classified the
above five vessels as Held for sale in the
accompanying December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet
at their estimated sale proceeds as all criteria required for
their classification as Held for Sale were met. The
estimated loss of approximately $65,913 is included in
Loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale in
the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations.
As of December 31, 2009, vessels held for sale consisted of
the
M/T Olinda,
the
M/V Pierre
and the
M/T Tigani,
of which the latter two were delivered to their new owners on
April 14, 2010 and May 4, 2010, respectively and
M/T Olindas
delivery was rescheduled in December 2010 to take place in April
2011. In 2009 the Company recognized an estimated loss of
$81,293 and in 2010 a gain of $2,487 due to the change of the
sale price of
M/T Tigani,
included in the accompanying 2009 and 2010 consolidated
statements of operations under Loss on sale of vessels and
vessels held for sale.
Vessels held for sale are stated at their fair values less cost
to sell. The fair values were determined based on the MOA prices
(Level 1).
|
|
5.
|
Vessels
under construction:
|
On March 8, 2010, the Company concluded three shipbuilding
contracts with China Shipbuilding Trading Company, Limited (the
Shipyard), for the constructions of three Capesize
VLOCs with a dwt of 206,000 tons each at a total contract price
of $204,300. The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the
first, second and third quarters of 2012. The advances paid to
the Shipyard as of December 31, 2010, have partially been
financed by the
DF-19
SEDA proceeds (Note 8(c)). Upon their delivery, the vessels
are scheduled to commence fixed rate employment as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the first vessel at a gross daily hire rate of $25 for a minimum
period of three years;
|
|
|
|
the second vessel at a gross daily hire rate of $23 for a
minimum period of five years. The time charter agreement also
provides for 50% profit sharing arrangement when the daily
Capesize average time charter rate, as defined in the charter
party, is between $23 and $40 per day; and
|
|
|
|
the third vessel at a gross daily hire rate of $21.5 for a
period of seven years. The time charter agreement also provides
for a 50% profit sharing arrangement when the daily Capesize
average time charter rate, as defined in the charter party, is
between $21.5 and $38 per day.
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had paid $45,000 as
provided in the shipbuilding contracts, which together with
other related costs of $1,618, including capitalized interest of
$964 (Note 14) and commissions and supervision fees of
$450 and $195 paid to Cardiff and TMS Dry Ltd, respectively
(Note 3), is included in Vessels under
construction in the accompanying December 31, 2010
consolidated balance sheet.
The amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
644,027
|
|
|
$
|
(56,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
587,189
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
180,501
|
|
|
|
(48,180
|
)
|
|
|
132,321
|
|
Impairment ( Note 2(l))
|
|
|
(67,903
|
)
|
|
|
15,203
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
Vessel held for sale
|
|
|
(153,622
|
)
|
|
|
22,341
|
|
|
|
(131,281
|
)
|
Vessels sold
|
|
|
(136,275
|
)
|
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
|
(112,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
466,728
|
|
|
$
|
(43,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
423,242
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
40,196
|
|
|
|
(24,594
|
)
|
|
|
15,602
|
|
Transfer from advances for vessel acquisitions
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
Vessel sold
|
|
|
(10,750
|
)
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
(10,134
|
)
|
Vessels held for sale
|
|
|
(162,646
|
)
|
|
|
35,180
|
|
|
|
(127,466
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
343,428
|
|
|
$
|
(32,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
311,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Memoranda of Agreement associated with the acquisition of
the vessels,
M/V Austin,
M/V Pierre,
M/V Trenton
and
M/V Topeka
in 2007 stipulated that the vessels were delivered to the
Company with charter parties attached, which expired in 2010.
The assumed charters were below market charter rates at the time
of the delivery and, accordingly, a portion of the consideration
paid for the vessels was allocated to the assumed charters to
the extent the vessel capitalized cost would not exceed its fair
value without a time charter contract. The Company recorded
imputed deferred revenue totaling $31,347, with a corresponding
increase in the vessels purchase price, which is being
amortized to revenue on a straight-line basis during the
remaining duration of the corresponding charter. The
amortization of imputed deferred revenue for 2008, 2009 and
2010, amounted to $10,318, 14,473 and $1,558, respectively and
is separately reflected in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
On May 21, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party for the sale of
M/V Lansing
at a price of $21,950. The vessel was delivered to its new
owners on July 1, 2009. The sale of the vessel resulted in
a loss of $14,770 and is included in Loss on sale of
vessels and vessels held for sale in the accompanying 2009
consolidated statement of operations.
On June 26, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party to purchase the 2004 Capesize bulk carrier (173,880 dwt)
M/V Partagas
for an aggregate price of $56,647 including $560 of
commissions paid to Cardiff and pre-delivery expenses of $87.
The vessel was delivered on July 30, 2009 and commenced a
three year time charter at a gross daily rate of $27.5. The
purchase price of the vessel was financed by equity raised under
the Companys
DF-20
Standby Equity Purchase Agreement or SEPA (Note 8(a)) and
using the existing Nordea revolving credit facility
(Note 7).
On July 8, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party to purchase the 2006 Capesize bulk carrier (173,949 dwt)
M/V Robusto
for an aggregate price of $61,945 including $612.5 of
commissions paid to Cardiff and pre-delivery expenses of $82.5.
The vessel was delivered on October 19, 2009 and commenced
a minimum five year time charter at a gross daily rate of $26.
The purchase price of the vessel was financed by equity raised
under the Companys SEPA (Note 8(a)) and using the
existing Nordea revolving credit facility (Note 7).
On July 10, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party for the sale of
M/V Juneau
at a price of $19,900. The vessel was delivered to its new
owners charter free on October 23, 2009. The sale of the
vessel resulted in a loss of $16,270 and is included in
Loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale in
the accompanying 2009 consolidated statements of operation.
On July 18, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party to purchase a 2006 Capesize bulk carrier (174,200 dwt)
M/V Cohiba
for an aggregate price of $61,909 including $612.5 of
commissions paid to Cardiff and pre-delivery expenses of $46.3.
The vessel was delivered on December 9, 2009 and commenced
a minimum five year time charter at a gross daily rate of
$26.25. The purchase price of the vessel was financed by equity
raised under the Companys (Note 8(a)) and using the
existing Nordea revolving credit facility (Note 7).
On August 7, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party for the sale of
M/V Richmond
at a price of $20.6 million. The vessel was delivered
to her new owners on September 30, 2009. The sale of the
vessel resulted in a loss of $20,842 and is included in
Loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale in
the accompanying 2009 consolidated statements of operation.
On September 30, 2009, the Company signed a MOA with a
third party to purchase the 2005 Capesize bulk carrier (180,263
dwt)
M/V Montecristo
for an aggregate price of $50,096 including commissions paid
to TMS Dry of $495 and pre-delivery expenses of $101. The vessel
was delivered to the Company on June 28, 2010. Following
its delivery the vessel commenced a time charter for a minimum
period of four years at a gross daily rate of $23.50. The
charterer has the option to extend the charter period for an
additional four years escalated to a maximum gross daily rate of
$24.5. The purchase price of the vessel was partially financed
by the equity contribution of Basset (Note 8(f)) and using
the Nordea existing revolving credit facility (Note 7).
On October 4, 2010, the Company signed a MOA with a third
party for the sale of
M/T Pink
Sands at a price of $11.1 million. The vessel was
delivered to its new owners on November 4, 2010. The sale
resulted in a gain of $511.
The Companys vessels have been pledged as collateral to
secure the bank loans discussed in Note 7.
As of December 31, 2010, except for the
M/T Olinda
and the
M/T Tamara
that are employed in separate tanker pools, and
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton
that are both employed in the spot market, the remaining
vessels were operating under time charters, the last of which
expires in May 2018. Contracts with expected duration in excess
of one year as of December 31, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Time Charter
|
|
Estimated Expiration of
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Gross Rate
|
|
Charter*
|
|
|
(In U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
Drybulk Carriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Robusto
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
|
August 2014 March 2018
|
M/V Cohiba
|
|
$
|
26,250
|
|
|
October 2014 May 2018
|
M/V Partagas
|
|
$
|
27,500
|
|
|
July 2012 December 2012
|
M/V Montecristo
|
|
$
|
23,500
|
|
|
May 2014 January 2018
|
M/V Topeka
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
January 2012 April 2013
|
M/V Helena
|
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
|
May 2012 October 2016
|
Drybulk Carrier Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Augusta
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
January 2011 (Note 16(a))
|
DF-21
|
|
|
* |
|
The Estimated Expiration of Charter provides the estimated
latest redelivery dates presented above, except for
M/V Augusta,
at the end of any redelivery optional periods. |
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys long-term debt
totaled $209,772 ($265,674 as of December 31,
2009) relating to a credit facility with Nordea Bank Norge
ASA (Facility or Nordea Credit Facility)
and a term loan with DVB Bank SE (loan or DVB
loan).
Nordea
Credit Facility
On September 18, 2007, the Company entered into an
agreement with Nordea Bank Norge ASA (Nordea), for a
$325,000 Senior Secured Credit Facility for the purpose of
refinancing the then outstanding balance of $118,000 of a
facility with Fortis Bank concluded in June 2007, to partially
finance the acquisition cost of vessels
M/V Trenton,
M/V Pierre,
M/V Austin,
M/V Juneau,
M/V Lansing,
M/V Helena,
M/V Topeka,
M/V Richmond
and
M/T Pink
Sands and financing the acquisition of additional vessels.
The Company and Nordea completed the syndication of the Nordea
credit facility on February 12, 2008 which resulted in
certain amendments to repayment terms and financial covenants,
increased interest margins and commitment fees on the undrawn
portion of the Facility.
On January 9, 2009, the Company entered into an amendatory
agreement to the Nordea credit facility which became effective
on January 23, 2009 and waived the breach of the collateral
maintenance coverage ratio covenant contained in such credit
facility resulting from the decrease in the market value of the
Companys vessels and reduced the level of the collateral
maintenance coverage ratio for the remaining term of the
agreement. The waiver was effective from the date the breach
occurred, which was December 9, 2008. Under the terms of
the amendatory agreement the Company on January 23, 2009,
made a prepayment of $25,000 and, among other requirements, is
also required (i) to ensure that under the reduced
collateral maintenance coverage ratio, the aggregate fair market
value of the vessels in the Companys fleet other than the
M/T Tamara
and
M/T Tigani,
plus proceeds from a vessels sale or insurance proceeds
from a vessels loss, and the excess of the fair market
value of each of the
M/T Tamara
and
M/T Tigani
over the recorded amount of the first priority ship mortgage
over each such vessel under the Companys DVB loan,
described below, be not less than (a) 90% of the aggregate
outstanding balance under the Nordea credit facility plus any
unutilized commitment in respect of Tranche A until
June 30, 2009, (b) 100% of the aggregate outstanding
balance under the Nordea credit facility plus any unutilized
commitment in respect of Tranche A from July 1, 2009
to December 31, 2009, (c) 110% of the aggregate
outstanding balance under the Nordea credit facility plus any
unutilized commitment in respect of Tranche A from
January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010, (d) 115% of
the aggregate outstanding balance under the Nordea credit
facility plus any unutilized commitment in respect of
Tranche A from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010,
and (e) 125% of the aggregate outstanding balance under the
Nordea credit facility plus any unutilized commitment in respect
of Tranche A at all times thereafter; (ii) to pay
interest at an increased margin over LIBOR; (iii) to
suspend the payment of dividends; and (iv) to pay the
sellers credit only with the proceeds of new equity
offerings or, common shares, which the seller may request at any
time, (v) from the closing date and until all commitments
are terminated and all amounts due under the Facility have been
repaid, the weighted average age of the vessels (weighted by the
fair market value of the vessels) shall not exceed
18 years; if any vessel reaches the age of 21 years or
more during this period, such vessel shall be assigned no value
in the calculation of the aggregate fair market value of the
vessels and (vi) liquidity must be at least $500 multiplied
by the number of vessels owned.
As provided in the first amendatory agreement to the Nordea
credit facility, in the case of a sale of a vessel the Company
has the option of either using the sale proceeds for the
prepayment of the facility or depositing such proceeds in an
escrow account pledged in favor of Nordea and using the funds to
finance the purchase of a new vessel of the same type or better
within 90 days. The Company made use of this option and
used the sale proceeds of the
M/V Lansing,
M/V Richmond,
M/V Juneau
and
M/V Pierre
to partially finance the acquisition of
M/V Partagas,
M/V Robusto,
M/V Cohiba
and
M/V Montecristo,
respectively.
DF-22
On November 4, 2010, following the sale of
M/T Pink
Sands, the Company decided not to exercise its option to use
the proceeds for a replacement vessel and accordingly made a
mandatory prepayment of the loan of $5,856 ($3,854 and $2,002
for Tranch A and Tranch B, respectively).
The amended Nordea credit facility is comprised of the following
two Tranches and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin:
Tranche A is a reducing revolving credit facility in a
maximum amount of $200,000 of which the Company utilized
$199,000 to repay the outstanding balance of the credit facility
with Fortis of $118,000, to partially finance the acquisition of
vessels and for working capital purposes. As of
December 31, 2010, following the mandatory prepayment of
$24,654 in 2011, due to the sale of
M/V Augusta,
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton
(Note 16) the balance of Tranche A of
$110,493 will be reduced or repaid in nine semi-annual equal
installments in the amount of $8,744 each and a balloon
installment in an amount of $31,797.
Tranche B is a term loan facility in a maximum amount of
$125,000 which was fully utilized to partially finance the
acquisition of vessels. As of December 31, 2010, following
the mandatory prepayment of $11,577 due to the sale of
M/V Augusta,
M/V Austin
and
M/V Trenton
(Note 16), the balance of Tranche B of $58,643 is
repayable in one installment of $6,752 followed by nine equal
consecutive semi-annual installments in the amount of $5,520
each and a balloon installment in the amount of $2,211.
The Facility is secured with first priority mortgages over the
vessels, first priority assignment of vessels insurances
and earnings, specific assignment of the time charters, first
priority pledges over the operating and retention accounts,
corporate guarantee and pledge of shares.
DVB
Loan agreement
On December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a loan
agreement with DVB Bank SE (DVB) for a new secured
term loan facility for an amount of $29.56 million, which
was fully drawn in January 2009. The Company used the proceeds
of the loan to make the prepayment in the amount of
$25.0 million under its amendatory agreement to its Nordea
credit facility. On May 4, 2010, the
M/T Tigani
was sold and as provided in the loan agreement a mandatory
prepayment of the loan of $8,562 was made, which proportionally
reduced the then outstanding loan installments. As a result the
balance of the loan at December 31, 2010 of $4,406 is
repayable in eight equal quarterly installments of $517.5 each,
plus a balloon installment of $266 payable together with the
last installment. The loan bears interest at 3.0% over LIBOR.
The loan is secured with first preferred mortgage on the
M/T Tamara,
a corporate guarantee by the Company, assignment of earnings and
insurances and a pledge of shares of the borrower. The loan
agreement includes, among other covenants, financial covenants
requiring that (i) liquidity must be at least $500
multiplied by the number of vessels owned, (ii) total
interest bearing liabilities over the sum of total interest
bearing liabilities plus shareholders equity adjusted to
account for the market value of the vessel must not exceed 90%
up to June 30, 2010, 80% up to December 31, 2010 and
70% thereafter; (iii) the ratio of EBITDA to net interest
expense of any accounting period must not be less than 2.50 to
1; and (iv) the aggregate charter free fair market value of
the vessel must not be less than 140% (increasing by five
percentage points each year, reaching 155% in the last year) of
the aggregate outstanding balance. The Company is permitted to
pay dividends under the loan of up to 50% of quarterly net
profits. The loan agreement contains certain events of default,
including a change of control, a cross-default with respect to
other financial indebtedness and a material adverse change in
the financial position or prospects of the borrowers or the
Company. Upon signing the loan agreement, the Company paid an
upfront fee of $443.5, which was included in Deferred
Financing fees in the accompanying December 31, 2009
and 2010 consolidated balance sheets and is amortized in
accordance with the policy discussed in Note 2(n).
On December 17, 2010, the Company signed a MOA for the sale
of
M/T Tamara.
The vessel was delivered to its new owners on January 13,
2011 Accordingly the balance of the loan as of December 31,
2010, of $4,406 has been classified as current (Note 16(b)).
DF-23
The principal payments required to be made after
December 31, 2010 for the long-term debt discussed above
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nordea
|
|
|
Nordea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Tranche A(1)
|
|
|
Tranche B(1)
|
|
|
DVB
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
42,140
|
|
|
$
|
23,849
|
|
|
$
|
4,406
|
|
|
$
|
70,397
|
|
2012
|
|
|
17.488
|
|
|
|
11,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,528
|
|
2013
|
|
|
17,488
|
|
|
|
11,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,528
|
|
2014
|
|
|
17,488
|
|
|
|
11,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,528
|
|
2015
|
|
|
40,540
|
|
|
|
13,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,146
|
|
|
$
|
70,220
|
|
|
$
|
4,406
|
|
|
$
|
209,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The current portion of the long term debt on the
December 31, 2010, Consolidated Balance Sheet has further
been adjusted to reflect the estimated amount of $11,934 to be
prepaid as a result of the contemplated sale of
M/T Olinda. |
Total interest expense for 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to
$14,836, $10,561 and 6,856, respectively, and is included in
Interest and finance costs in the accompanying 2008,
2009 and 2010 consolidated statements of operations
(Note 14). The Companys weighted average interest
rate (including the margin) for 2008, 2009 and 2010 was 4.49%,
3.41% and 2.88%, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Common
Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital:
|
(a) Stockholders Rights
Agreement: On April 17, 2008, the
Company approved a Stockholders Rights Agreement with
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent, effective as of April 30, 2008. Under this
Agreement, the Company declared a dividend payable of one
preferred share purchase right, or Right, to purchase one
one-thousandth of a share of the Companys Series A
Participating Preferred Stock for each outstanding share of
OceanFreight Inc. Class A common stock, par value
U.S. $0.01 per share. The Rights will separate from the
common stock and become exercisable after (1) the
10th day after public announcement that a person or group
acquires ownership of 20% or more of the Companys common
stock or (2) the 10th business day (or such later date
as determined by the Companys board of directors) after a
person or group announces a tender or exchange offer which would
result in that person or group holding 20% or more of the
Companys common stock. On the distribution date, each
holder of a Right will be entitled to purchase for $100 (the
Exercise Price) a fraction (1/1000th) of one share
of the Companys preferred stock which has similar economic
terms as one share of common stock. If an acquiring person (an
Acquiring Person) acquires more than 20% of the
Companys common stock then each holder of a Right (except
an Acquiring Person) will be entitled to buy at the exercise
price, a number of shares of the Companys common stock
which has a market value of twice the exercise price. Any time
after the date an Acquiring Person obtains more than 20% of the
Companys common stock and before that Acquiring Person
acquires more than 50% of the Companys outstanding common
stock, the Company may exchange each Right owned by all other
Rights holders, in whole or in part, for one share of the
Companys common stock. The Company can redeem the Rights
at any time on or prior to the earlier of a public announcement
that a person has acquired ownership of 20% or more of the
Companys common stock, or the expiration date. The Rights
expire on the earliest of (1) May 12, 2018 or
(2) the exchange or redemption of the Rights as described
above. The terms of the rights and the Stockholders Rights
Agreement may be amended without the consent of the Rights
holders at any time on or prior to the Distribution Date. After
the Distribution Date, the terms of the rights and the
Stockholders Rights Agreement may be amended to make changes
that do not adversely affect the rights of the Rights holders
(other than the Acquiring Person). The Rights do not have any
voting rights. The Rights have the benefit of certain customary
anti-dilution protections.
Under the Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement
effective May 26, 2010, the purchase by Basset Holdings
Inc. (Basset) of shares of the Companys Common
Stock directly from the Company in a transaction approved by the
Companys Board of Directors in May 2010, shall not cause
Basset Holdings Inc., or any beneficial owner or Affiliate or
Associate thereof, to be considered an Acquiring
Person; provided, however, that should Basset or any
Affiliate or Associate of Basset thereafter acquire additional
shares of Common Stock
DF-24
constituting 1% or more of the Companys Common Stock then
outstanding, and thereby beneficially own 20% or more of the
Companys Common Stock then outstanding, other than by
reason of an equity incentive award issued to Basset or such
Affiliate or Associate by the Companys Board of Directors
or a duly constituted committee thereof, then such Person shall
be deemed an Acquiring Person for purposes of this
Agreement.
(b) Standby Equity Purchase Agreement
(SEPA): On January 30, 2009, the
Company entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement, or the
SEPA, with YA Global Master SPV Ltd., or YA Global, for the
offer and sale of up to $147.9 million of its common
shares, par value $0.01 per share. In accordance with the terms
of the SEPA, the Company sold 23,950,000 (71,850,000 before the
reverse stock split effect) common shares with net proceeds
amounting to $109,909. YA Global received a discount equal to
1.5% of the gross proceeds or $1,674. The SEPA was terminated on
May 21, 2009. Of the SEPA proceeds, $25,000 was used to
fully repay the sellers credit of the
M/T Tamara
and
M/T Tigani.
(c) Amendment of the Companys Articles of
Incorporation: On July 13, 2009, during the
Companys annual general meeting of shareholders, the
Companys shareholders approved an amendment to the
Companys articles of incorporation to increase the
Companys authorized common shares from 31,666,667
(95,000,000 before the reverse stock split effect)) common
shares to 333,333,333 (1,000,000,000 before the reverse stock
split effect) common shares.
(c) Standby Equity Distribution Agreement
(SEDA): On July 24, 2009, the
Company entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, or
the SEDA, with YA Global, pursuant to which the Company may
offer and sell up to $450,000 of the Companys common
shares to YA Global. The SEDA commenced on September 28,
2009 and terminated on March 18, 2010. YA Global was
entitled to receive a discount equal to 1.5%. As of
December 31, 2009, 22,685,169 (68,055,508 before the
reverse stock split) common shares had been sold with net
proceeds amounting to $78,970. During the period from
January 1, 2010 to March 18, 2010, 6,717,667
(20,150,000 before the reverse stock split) common shares were
sold with net proceeds of $19,257. During the period from the
commencement of the offering on September 28, 2009 to the
termination of the offering on March 18, 2010, the Company
sold 29,401,836 (88,205,508 before the reverse stock split)
common shares with net proceeds amounting to $98,227, and YA
Global received a discount equal to 1.5% of the gross proceeds
or $1,496.
(d) Shelf Registration Statement: On
January 12, 2010, the Company filed a shelf registration
statement on
Form F-3,
which was declared effective on January 21, 2010, pursuant
to which it may sell up to $400,000 of an undeterminable number
of securities.
(e) Equity Incentive Plan (2010 Equity
Incentive Plan): On January 14, 2010,
the Companys Board of Directors adopted and approved the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan, under which 10,000,000 (30,000,000
before the reverse stock split) common shares were reserved for
issuance. On January 18, 2010, the Companys Board of
Directors adopted and approved in all respects the resolutions
of the meetings of the Compensation Committee held on
January 15, 2010, pursuant to which 1,000,000 (3,000,000
before the reverse stock split) common shares were awarded to
Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a company controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and 66,667 (200,000
before the reverse stock split) common shares were awarded to
the Companys Directors and officers. On December 17,
2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved in all
respects the resolutions of the meetings of the Compensation
Committee held on December 17, 2010, pursuant to which
6,000,000 were awarded to Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a
company controlled by the Companys Chief Executive Officer.
(f) Equity Infusion: On May 25,
2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved an equity
infusion of $20,000 by Basset Holdings Inc.
(Basset), a company controlled by Mr. Anthony
Kandylidis the Companys CEO, in order to fund the
Companys capital needs for the purchase of
M/V Montecristo.
On May 28, 2010, Basset paid the amount of $20,000 in
exchange for approximately 16,666,667 (50,000,000 before the
reverse stock split at a price of $0.40 per share) of the
Companys common shares.
In determining the fair value of the shares to be issued in
connection with the equity infusion, the Company used multiple
inputs from different sources, including: (a) analyst
target prices, (b) multiples-based valuation and
(c) net asset value method. The Company considered the
results of such analyses, together with: (1) the importance
of the equity infusion, (2) the size of the equity infusion
versus the limited market liquidity, and (3) the
opportunity cost of the capital contribution for other similar
investment opportunities. Given the specific circumstances of
the
DF-25
equity infusion, the results of the analysis and the factors
described above, the Company approved the equity infusion of
$20,000 in exchange of approximately 16,666,667 (50,000,000
before the reverse stock split effect) of the Companys
common shares at a price of $0.40 per share before the reverse
stock split effect.
On May 26, 2010, the Stockholders Right Agreement that the
Company entered into on April 30, 2008, was amended and
restated in connection with the above transaction such that
Basset would not fall within the definition of Acquiring
Person under the agreement.
(g) Share Price and Reverse Stock
Split: Under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock
Market, listed companies are required to maintain a share price
of at least $1.00 per share and if the closing share price stays
below $1.00 for a period of 30 consecutive business days, then
the listed company would have a cure period of at least
180 days to regain compliance with the $1.00 per share
minimum. In the event the Company does not regain compliance
within the period of 180 days, its securities will be
subject to delisting. In addition if the market price of the
common shares remains below $5.00 per share, under stock
exchange rules, the Companys shareholders will not be able
to use such shares as collateral for borrowing in margin
accounts. The Companys stock price declined below $1.00
per share for a period of 30 consecutive business days, and on
March 1, 2010 the Company received notice from the NASDAQ
Stock Market that it is not in compliance with the minimum bid
price rule. In order for the Company to regain compliance, its
Board of Directors proposed a 3:1 reverse stock split, which
automatically converted three current shares of the
Companys class A common shares into one new share of
common stock. The reverse stock split was approved by the
Companys shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held
on June 10, 2010. The reverse stock split took effect on
June 17, 2010, and accordingly, the Companys
authorized Class A common stock was converted to
333,333,333 shares, and the then issued and outstanding
common stock of 231,800,001 common shares was converted to
77,266,655 common shares. Following the reverse stock split the
Companys stock remained above $1.00 for a period of 10
consecutive business days and, as a result, on August 6,
2010, the Company received notice from the NASDAQ Stock market
that it had regained compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement and the compliance matter was closed
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys issued and
outstanding stock amounted to 83,266,655 common shares. Common
share shareholders are entitled to one vote on all matters
submitted to a vote of shareholders and to receive interest, if
any.
|
|
9.
|
Earnings/
(losses) per Share:
|
The components for the calculation of earnings/(losses) per
common and subordinated share, basic and diluted, for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
27,722
|
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Less dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
(47,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed losses
|
|
$
|
(20,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of undistributed losses Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181,498, 52,816,667 and 83,266,655,as of
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively
|
|
$
|
(19,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Subordinated shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nil as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(178,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DF-26
Basic
and diluted per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Distributed earnings
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Undistributed losses
|
|
|
(4.20
|
)
|
|
|
(6.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5.82
|
|
|
$
|
(6.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares basic and diluted
|
|
|
4,773,824
|
|
|
|
26,185,442
|
|
|
|
70,488,531
|
|
Due to the conversion of the subordinated shares into common
shares during August 2008, the basic and diluted per share
amounts are presented only for common shares for the year ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
|
|
10.
|
Derivatives
and Fair Value Measurements:
|
Interest
rate swaps
On January 29, 2008, the Company entered into two interest
rate swap agreements with Nordea, the Companys lending
bank, to partially hedge its exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates on a notional amount of $316,500 ($236,222 as of
December 31, 2010), decreasing in accordance with the debt
repayments, by converting the variable rate of its debt to fixed
rate for a period for 5 years, effective April 1,
2008. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement the
Company and the bank agreed to exchange at specified intervals,
the difference between paying a fixed rate at 3.55% and a
floating rate interest amount calculated by reference to the
agreed notional amounts and maturities. These instruments have
not been designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging and, consequently, the changes in fair
value of these instruments are recorded through earnings. The
fair value of these instruments at December 31, 2010, is
determined based on observable Level 2 inputs, as defined
in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets, liabilities
(risk adjusted) and market-corroborated inputs, such as market
comparables, interest rates, yield curves and other items that
allow value to be determined. The fair value of these
instruments at December 31, 2009 amounted to a liability of
$11,049 (excluding accrued interest receivable of $2,243), of
which the current and non-current portions of $7,443 and $3,606,
respectively, are included in current and non-current derivative
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009. The fair value of these instruments at
December 31, 2010 amounted to a liability of $11,602
(excluding accrued interest payable of $1,947), of which the
current and non-current portions of $6,727 and $4,875,
respectively, are included in current and non-current derivative
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2010. The unrealized result of the change in
the fair value of these instruments for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, was a loss of $16,147, a
gain of $5,098 and an a loss of $553, respectively, and are
included in Loss on derivative instruments in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The realized
loss of these instruments for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010, was $1,037, $7,665 and $8,160,
respectively, and is included in Loss on derivative
instruments in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
The amounts for 2008 ($1,037) and 2009 ($7,665) previously
included in Interest and finance costs
(Note 14) were reclassified to Loss on
derivative instruments to conform to the December 31,
2010, presentation.
Forward
Freight Agreements (FFAs)
In May 2009, the Company engaged in Forward Freight Agreements
(FFA) trading activities. The Company trades in the FFAs market
with both an objective to utilize them as economic hedging
instruments in reducing the risk on specific vessel(s), freight
commitments, or the overall fleet or operations, and to take
advantage of short term fluctuations in the market prices. FFAs
trading generally have not qualified as hedges for accounting
purposes and as such, the trading of FFAs could lead to material
fluctuations in the Companys reported results from
operations on a period to period basis. The open positions of
FFAs are marked to market quarterly, using quoted
prices in active markets for identical instruments (Level 1
inputs), to determine the fair values. As of December 31,
2009 and 2010, all FFA positions had been closed.
DF-27
The net realized gain/(loss) from FFAs for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010 amounted to $570 and $(4,342),
respectively, and is separately reflected in the accompanying
2009 and 2010 consolidated statements of operations.
Fair
value measurements
The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets of financial assets and accounts payable
approximate their respective fair values due to the short
maturity of these instruments. The fair value of long-term bank
loans with variable interest rates approximate the recorded
values, generally due to their variable interest rates.
The following tables set forth by level our assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and
non-recurring basis. As required by the fair value guidance,
assets and liabilities and are categorized in their entirety
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
Recurring Measurements
|
|
Total
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Interest rate swaps liability position
|
|
$
|
11,602
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,602
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,602
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,602
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
Non-Recurring Measurements
|
|
Total
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Long lived assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
88,274
|
|
|
$
|
88,274
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
88,274
|
|
|
$
|
88,274
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Stock
based compensation:
|
On February 12, 2008, the Company granted 26,667 (80,000
before the reverse stock split effect) restricted subordinated
shares, vesting 25% annually, to Steel Wheel Investments
Limited, a company providing consulting services to the Company
in connection with the duties of the Chief Executive Officer,
which is controlled by the Chief Executive Officer, subject to
contractual restrictions, including applicable vesting period.
The shares were issued on March 27, 2008. Following the
conversion of the Companys subordinated shares into common
shares on August 15, 2008, the aggregate of 26,667 (80,000
before the reverse stock split effect) restricted subordinated
shares mentioned above vested immediately as provided in the
related agreements. In addition, in March 2008, the Company
issued 1,716 (5,150 before the reverse stock split effect) )
shares to Sebert Shipping Co. a company providing consulting
services to the Company and was controlled by the former Chief
Operating Officer of the Company. Following the resignation of
the former Chief Operating Officer in March 2009, the shares
vested immediately pursuant to a resolution of the
Companys Board of Directors.
Following the conversion of the Companys subordinated
shares into common shares, the aggregate of 28,383 (85,150
before the reverse stock split effect) restricted subordinated
shares mentioned above vested immediately as provided in the
related agreements.
On January 14, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, under which
10,000,000 (30,000,000 before the reverse stock split) common
shares were reserved for issuance. On January 18, 2010, the
Companys Board of Directors adopted and approved in all
respects the resolutions of the meetings of the Compensation
Committee held on January 15, 2010, pursuant to which
1,000,000 (3,000,000 before the reverse stock split) common
shares were awarded to Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a
company controlled by the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and 66,667 (200,000 before the reverse stock split) common
shares were
DF-28
awarded to the Companys Directors and officers. On
December 17, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved in all respects the resolutions of the
meeting of the Compensation Committee held on December 17,
2010, pursuant to which 6,000,000 common shares were awarded to
Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a company controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer.
There were 7,056,667 unvested shares as of December 31,
2010. Compensation cost recognized in the years 2008, 2009 and
2010 amounted to $2,701, $44 and $1,064, respectively. The
compensation cost related to non-vested shares amounts to $7,676
with a weighted average remaining contractual life of
32 months.
Under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands, Cyprus,
Liberia and Malta, the companies are not subject to tax on
international shipping income; however, they are subject to
registration and tonnage taxes, which have been included in
vessel operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.
Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of the United States
(the Code), U.S. source income from the
international operations of ships is generally exempt from
U.S. tax if the company operating the ships meets both of
the following requirements: (a) the Company is organized in
a foreign country that grants an equivalent exemption to
corporations organized in the United States and
(b) either (i) more than 50% of the value of the
Companys stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by
individuals who are residents of the Companys
country of organization or of another foreign country that
grants an equivalent exemption to corporations
organized in the United States (50% Ownership Test) or
(ii) the Companys stock is primarily and
regularly traded on an established securities market in
its country of organization, in another country that grants an
equivalent exemption to United States
corporations, or in the United States (Publicly-Traded
Test).
Under the regulations, the Companys stock will be
considered to be regularly traded on an established
securities market if (i) one or more classes of its stock
representing 50 percent or more of its outstanding shares,
by voting power and value, is listed on the market and is traded
on the market, other than in minimal quantities, on at least
60 days during the taxable year; and (ii) the
aggregate number of shares of our stock traded during the
taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of shares of
the stock outstanding during the taxable year. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the regulations provide, in pertinent part, that
each class of the Companys stock will not be considered to
be regularly traded on an established securities
market for any taxable year in which 50% or more of the vote and
value of the outstanding shares of such class are owned,
actually or constructively under specified stock attribution
rules, on more than half the days during the taxable year by
persons who each own 5% or more of the value of such class of
the Companys outstanding stock (5 Percent
Override Rule).
In the event the 5 Percent Override Rule is triggered, the
regulations provide that the 5 Percent Override Rule will
nevertheless not apply if the Company can establish that among
the closely-held group of 5% Stockholders, there are sufficient
5% Stockholders that are considered to be qualified
stockholders for purposes of Section 883 to preclude
non-qualified 5% Stockholders in the closely-held group from
owning 50% or more of each class of the Companys stock for
more than half the number of days during the taxable year.
Treasury regulations are effective for calendar year taxpayers,
like the Company, beginning with the calendar year 2005. All the
Companys ship-operating subsidiaries currently satisfy the
50% Ownership Test. In addition, following the completion of the
Initial Public Offering of the Companys shares, the
management of the Company believes that by virtue of a special
rule applicable to situations where the ship operating companies
are beneficially owned by a publicly traded company like the
Company, the Publicly Traded Test can be satisfied based on the
trading volume and the widely-held ownership of the
Companys shares, but no assurance can be given that this
will remain so in the future, since continued compliance with
this rule is subject to factors outside the Companys
control.
|
|
13.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies:
|
Various claims, suits, and complaints, including those involving
government regulations and product liability, arise in the
ordinary course of shipping business. In addition, losses may
arise from disputes with charterers, agents, insurance and other
claims with suppliers relating to the operations of the
Companys vessels. Currently
DF-29
management is not aware of any such claims or contingent
liabilities which should be disclosed, or for which a provision
should be established in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
The Company accrues for the cost of environmental liabilities
when management becomes aware that a liability is probable and
is able to reasonably estimate the probable exposure. Currently,
management is not aware of any such claim or contingent
liabilities which should be disclosed, or for which a provision
should be established in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. Up to $1 billion of the liabilities associated
with the individual vessels actions, mainly for sea
pollution, are covered by the Protection and Indemnity
(P&I) Club Insurance.
On August 13, 2007, the Company entered into a six-year
lease for office facilities in Athens, which expires in August
2013 with the Companys option to extend the agreement
through October 1, 2017. The monthly lease payment is
Euro 5,175 ($6.85 based on the Euro to USD exchange rate at
December 31, 2010) and is adjusted on
August 1st of each year based on the inflation rate
announced by the Greek State as defined in the agreement. On
September 30, 2010, the Company gave notice to the owner
for the termination of the lease agreement as of
December 31, 2010. Based on the provisions of Greek law,
the Company paid the owner a penalty equal to one month rental
and the lease obligation up to December 31, 2010 and the
lease agreement was terminated.
As further disclosed in Note 5 the Company has signed three
shipbuilding contracts for the construction of three VLOCs. As
of December 31, 2010, the amounts due until delivery of the
vessels are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
40,860
|
|
2012
|
|
|
118,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
159,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum contractual charter revenue deriving from
vessels long-term charter contracts represents revenue
until the earliest redelivery of each vessel and includes also
the revenue to be earned from vessels under construction. As of
December 31, 2010, future contractual revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
54,877
|
|
2012
|
|
|
51,077
|
|
2013
|
|
|
53,016
|
|
2014
|
|
|
42,044
|
|
2015
|
|
|
18,518
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
42,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
262,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue amounts do not include any assumed off-hires.
As further disclosed in Note 3 the Company has contracted
the commercial and technical management of its vessels to TMS
Dry Ltd and TMS Tankers Ltd. For these services it pays a
monthly management fee. Such management fees until the
expiration of the agreements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
4,624
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
2014
|
|
|
6,531
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DF-30
|
|
14.
|
Interest
and Finance Costs:
|
The amounts included in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
$
|
14,836
|
|
|
$
|
10,561
|
|
|
$
|
6,856
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
Amortization and write-off of financing fees
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
Long-term debt commitment fees
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Other
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,528
|
|
|
$
|
12,169
|
|
|
$
|
6,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The realized result (loss) of the change in the fair value of
the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 10 for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, of $1,037 and $7,665,
respectively, previously included in Interest and finance
costs were reclassified to Loss on derivative
instruments to conform with the December 31, 2010
presentation. In addition as a result of the above
reclassification the amounts of interest paid in the
consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, were changed from $12,340 and
$18,509, respectively, to $11,044 and $13,339, respectively.
The table below presents information about the Companys
reportable segments as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010
and for the years then ended. The accounting policies followed
in the preparation of the reportable segments are the same as
those followed in the preparation of the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
114,758
|
|
|
$
|
42,676
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,434
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(11,173
|
)
|
|
|
(5,316
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(16,528
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(12,076
|
)
|
|
|
(5,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,184
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(32,865
|
)
|
|
|
(10,762
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(43,658
|
)
|
Segment profit/(loss)
|
|
|
31,766
|
|
|
|
4,260
|
|
|
|
(8,304
|
)
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
408,680
|
|
|
$
|
184,753
|
|
|
$
|
32,137
|
|
|
$
|
625,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
96,672
|
|
|
$
|
36,263
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
133,505
|
|
Loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
(69,250
|
)
|
|
|
(63,926
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,176
|
)
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(7,333
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(12,169
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(30,100
|
)
|
|
|
(18,080
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(48,272
|
)
|
Impairment on vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,700
|
)
|
Segment loss
|
|
|
(46,248
|
)
|
|
|
(124,865
|
)
|
|
|
(7,569
|
)
|
|
|
(178,682
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
444,180
|
|
|
$
|
56,253
|
|
|
$
|
48,839
|
|
|
$
|
549,272
|
|
DF-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
71,844
|
|
|
$
|
26,004
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,848
|
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
(65,711
|
)
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,929
|
)
|
Interest and finance costs, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
(2,461
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(7,202
|
)
|
|
|
(1,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,713
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(23,252
|
)
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(24,853
|
)
|
Segment profit/(loss)
|
|
|
(62,193
|
)
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
(8,408
|
)
|
|
|
(61,625
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
428,187
|
|
|
$
|
33,588
|
|
|
$
|
17,088
|
|
|
$
|
478,863
|
|
(a) On October 4, 2010, the Company contracted to sell
the
M/V Augusta
(Note 4). The vessel was delivered to its new owners on
January 6, 2011. Of the sale proceeds an amount of $11,580
was used to partially repay the Nordea credit facility
(Note 7). The sale resulted in a loss of $31,628 reflected
as an impairment loss and is included in Loss on sale of
vessels and vessels held for sale in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010
(b) On December 17, 2010, the Company contracted to
sell the
M/T Tamara
(Note 4). The vessel was delivered to its new owners on
January 13, 2011. Of the sale proceed an amount of $4,406
was used to fully repay the DVB term loan (Note 7). The
sale resulted in a gain of $858 recorded in 2011.
(c) Under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, listed
companies are required to maintain a share price of at least
$1.00 per share and if the closing share price stays below $1.00
for a period of 30 consecutive business days, then the listed
company would have a cure period of at least 180 days to
regain compliance with the $1.00 per share minimum. The
Companys stock price has declined below $1.00 per share
for a period of 30 consecutive business days, and on
January 25, 2011 the Company received notice from the
Nasdaq Stock Market that it is not in compliance with the
minimum bid price rule.
(d) On January 1, 2011, the Company leased office
space in Athens, Greece, from a family member of Mr. George
Economou. The lease has a duration of five years. The monthly
rental for the first two years amounts to Euro 1,000 ($1.33
at the December 31, 2010 exchange rate) and thereafter is
annually adjusted based on the annual inflation rate announced
by the Greek State.
(e) On February 24, 2011, the Company signed a letter
of commitment with a major Chinese bank for the financing of up
to 60% of the aggregate construction cost of the three VLOCs
discussed in Note 5.
(f) On November 19, 2010, the Company contracted to
sell the
M/V Austin
(Note 4). The vessel was delivered to its new owners on
March 10, 2011. Of the sale proceeds an amount of $12,325
was used to partially repay the Nordea credit facility
(Note 7). The sale resulted in a loss of $17,184 reflected
as an impairment loss and is included in Loss on sale of
vessels and vessels held for sale in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
(g) On November 19, 2010, the Company contracted to
sell the
M/V Trenton
(Note 4). The vessel was delivered to its new owners on
March 11, 2011. Of the sale proceeds an amount of $12,325
was used to partially repay the Nordea credit facility
(Note 7). The sale resulted in a loss of $16,882 reflected
as an impairment loss and is included in Loss on sale of
vessels and vessels held for sale in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
(h) On April 1, 2011, the Company entered into two
agreements to purchase two capesize vessels under construction
of 206,000 DWT each, through the acquisition of the shares of
their owning companies (the Owners). The Owners are
fully owned subsidiaries of a company (the Sellers)
ultimately controlled by the Companys CEO Mr. Anthony
Kandylidis. The Sellers will receive in exchange of the selling
price of both vessels a total number of 35,657,142 common shares
of the Company and the Company will perform the shipbuilding
contracts. The vessels are scheduled to be delivered in the
second and fourth quarter of 2013. The total outstanding yard
payments amount to $95,040 of which $29,700 is payable in 2012
and the balance in 2013.
DF-32
Annex E
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this report,
the terms Company, we, us,
and our refer to OceanFreight Inc. and all of its
subsidiaries. OceanFreight Inc. refers only to
OceanFreight Inc. and not its subsidiaries.
We use the term deadweight tons, or dwt, in describing the size
of vessels. Dwt expressed in metric tons, each of which is
equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to the maximum weight of
cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry.
Our
Company
We are a Marshall Islands company with our principal executive
offices located in Athens, Greece. As of August 22, 2011 we
owned and operated, through our subsidiaries, a fleet of six
vessels, consisting of two Panamax and four Capesize drybulk
carriers, with a total carrying capacity of approximately
0.9 million dwt and a weighted average age of approximately
6.7 years. Our vessels are chartered under long term time
charter contracts expiring at various dates, the latest through
2018. In March 2010, we entered into shipbuilding contracts for
the construction of three Capesize Very Large Ore Carriers
(VLOCs). In April 2011 we entered into two agreements to
purchase two additional VLOCs under construction.
As further discussed under Recent Developments, on
July 26, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement for
DryShips Inc. to acquire our outstanding shares.
Our
Fleet
The following table presents summary information concering our
fleet as of August 22, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Vessel Type
|
|
Year Built
|
|
Deadweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in metric tons)
|
|
Drybulk Carriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robusto
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
173,949
|
|
Cohiba
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
174,200
|
|
Montecristo
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
180,263
|
|
Partagas
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
173,880
|
|
Topeka
|
|
|
Panamax
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
74,710
|
|
Helena
|
|
|
Panamax
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
73,744
|
|
Drybulk Carriers to be Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Building VLOC#1(1)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
New Building VLOC#2(1)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
New Building VLOC#3(1)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
New Building VLOC#4(2)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
New Building VLOC#5(2)
|
|
|
Capesize
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
206,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 4, 2010, we entered into an agreement with a
shipyard for the construction of three VLOCs for an aggregate
price of $204.3 million. The vessels are scheduled for
delivery in the first, second and fourth quarters of 2012. |
|
(2) |
|
On April 1, 2011, we entered into two agreements to
purchase two VLOCs currently under construction through the
acquisition of the shares of the construction agreement owning
companies that were indirectly controlled by our Chief Executive
Officer in exchange for an aggregate of 1,782,849 common shares
(35,657,142 common shares before the second reverse stock split)
of the Company. The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the
fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013, respectively. |
The total outstanding shipyard payments owed by us amount to
$240.7 million, of which $26.4 million is payable in
2011, $184.6 million is payable in 2012 and the balance is
payable in 2013.
E-1
Effective June 15, 2010, we have contracted the
day-to-day
management of our drybulk and tanker fleets, which includes
performing the
day-to-day
operations and maintenance of the vessels, to TMS Dry Ltd., or
TMS Dry, and TMS Tankers Ltd., or TMS Tankers, respectively.
Both TMS Dry and TMS Tankers, or our Fleet Managers, are related
party management companies engaged under separate vessel
management agreements directly by our respective wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Previously the management of our fleet was
performed by Cardiff Marine Inc., or Cardiff, a related party
management company. In 2010, Cardiff completed an internal
restructuring for the purpose of enhancing its efficiency and
the quality of its ship management services. As part of this
restructuring our Fleet Managers were established as two
different management companies that provide the same vessel
management services previously provided by Cardiff. Our Fleet
Managers utilize the same experienced personnel previously
utilized by Cardiff and provide comprehensive vessel management
services including technical supervision, such as repairs,
maintenance and inspections, safety and quality, crewing and
training, supply provisioning as well as vessel accounting. We
believe that our Fleet Managers maintain high standards of
operation, vessel technical condition, safety and environmental
protection and control operating expenses through comprehensive
planned maintenance systems, preventive maintenance programs and
by retaining and training qualified crew members. We further
believe that the scale and scope of our Fleet Managers enables
them to achieve significant economies of scale when procuring
supplies and insurance. These economies of scale, as well as our
Fleet Managers ability to spread their operating costs
over a larger number of vessels in conjunction with their cost
containment programs, are expected to result in cost savings to
us. We intend to rely on our Fleet Managers established
operations to help us manage our growth without having to
integrate additional resources since we will rely on their
resources to manage additional vessels we may acquire in the
future.
Our vessels are presently operating under long term fixed rate
time charter agreements as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Daily
|
Vessel Name
|
|
Estimated Expiration Range of Charter
|
|
Rate
|
|
Drybulk Carriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robusto
|
|
August 2014 to March 2018
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
Cohiba
|
|
October 2014 to May 2018
|
|
$
|
26,250
|
|
Partagas
|
|
July 2012 to Dec 2012
|
|
$
|
27,500
|
|
Montecristo
|
|
May 2014 to Jan 2018
|
|
$
|
23,500
|
|
Topeka
|
|
January 2012 to April 2013
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
Helena
|
|
May 2012 to October 2016
|
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
Drybulk Carriers to be Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Building VLOC#1(1)
|
|
April 2015 to April 2020
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
New Building VLOC#2(2)
|
|
August 2017 to August 2022
|
|
$
|
23,000
|
|
New Building VLOC#3(3)
|
|
October 2019 to October 2026
|
|
$
|
21,500
|
|
New Building VLOC#4
|
|
Spot
|
|
|
|
|
New Building VLOC#5
|
|
Spot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Upon delivery of New Building VLOC#1, which is expected
in the first quarter of 2012, the vessel is scheduled to
commence time charter employment for a minimum period of three
years at a gross daily rate of $25,000. |
|
(2) |
|
Upon delivery of New Building VLOC#2, which is expected
in the second quarter of 2012, the vessel is scheduled to
commence time charter employment for a minimum period of five
years at a gross daily rate of $23,000. In addition the time
charter contract provides for a 50% profit sharing arrangement
when the daily Capesize average time charter rate, as defined in
the charter agreement, is between $23,000 and $40,000 per day. |
|
(3) |
|
Upon delivery of New Building VLOC#3, which is expected
in the fourth quarter of 2012, the vessel is scheduled commence
time charter employment for a minimum period of seven years at a
gross daily rate of $21,500. In addition the time charter
contract provides for a 50% profit sharing arrangement when the
daily Capesize average time charter rate, as defined in the
charter agreement, is between $21,500 and $38,000 per day. |
E-2
We believe these charters will provide us with stable cash flows
as well as upside potential under our profit sharing agreements.
In addition, renewing our period charters at different times
enables us to reduce our exposure to market conditions
prevailing at any one time.
OceanFreights
strategy and business model
Our strategy is to be a reliable and responsible provider of
seaborne transportation services and to manage and expand our
company in a manner that we believe will enable us to enhance
shareholder value by increasing long term cash flow. We intend
to realize these objectives by adhering to the following:
Strategic Fleet Expansion. We intend to grow
our fleet using our managements knowledge of the seaborne
transportation industry to make accretive, timely and selective
acquisitions of vessels in different sectors based on a number
of financial and operational criteria. We will consider and
analyze our expectations of fundamental developments in the
particular industry sector, the level of liquidity in the resale
and charter market, the cash flows earned by the vessels in
relation to their values, their conditions and technical
specifications, expected remaining useful life, the credit
quality of the charterer and duration and terms of charter
contracts for vessels acquired with charters attached, as well
as the overall diversification of our fleet and customers.
Tailored Fleet Composition. Our current fleet
consists of six drybulk carriers. In addition, we have agreed to
acquire five VLOC newbuilding drybulk carriers that are expected
to be delivered in 2012 and 2013. We primarily focus on the
drybulk and tanker segments because the acquisition and
employment contracts of these vessels satisfy our financial and
operating criteria. As we grow our fleet over time, we intend to
explore acquisitions in other seaborne transportation sectors,
as opportunities arise, that also meet our financial and
operating criteria. We believe that monitoring developments in
multiple sectors will position us to opportunistically select
vessels in different sectors for acquisition and vessel
employment opportunities as conditions in those sectors dictate.
We also believe that this outlook enables us to lower our
dependence on any one shipping sector as we seek to generate
revenues and find attractive acquisition opportunities.
Fixed Rate Charters. We have entered into
fixed rate period charters for all of our drybulk carrier
vessels with an average remaining duration of approximately
39.3 months as of the date of this Report. We believe these
charters will provide us with stable cash flow and high vessel
utilization rates and also limit our exposure to charter rate
volatility. In the future we will continue to seek fixed rate
period charter contracts for our vessels, which include time and
bareboat charters, pursuant to which the charterer pays a fixed
daily charter rate over a specified period of time. Period
charter contracts may include profit sharing arrangements
whereby we receive additional charterhire when spot charter
rates exceed the fixed daily rate under the period charter. We
may also enter into period charters that afford some exposure to
the spot market through floating rate period charters where the
daily charter rate fluctuates in line with spot rates but cannot
fluctuate below a minimum rate, or floor, or above a maximum
rate, or ceiling. We may enter into short-term spot charters or
place additional vessels in pools which enable participating
vessels to combine revenues.
Staggered Charter Renewals. We seek employment
for our vessels based on our analysis and assessment of
fundamental developments in each particular sector of the
industry and the difference in rates for short-, medium- and
long-term charters. Renewing our period charters at different
times enables us to reduce our exposure to market conditions
prevailing at any one time.
Diversified Charter Counterparties. Our
vessels are chartered to two different charterers operating in
the drybulk carrier sector. We believe that chartering our
vessels to well established and reputable charterers reduces
counterparty risk. As we grow our fleet over time, we may invest
in other seaborne transportation sectors and seek to further
diversify the end-users of our vessels, thereby enhancing the
overall credit quality of our charter portfolio.
Quality Fleet Managers. As discussed above,
our Fleet Managers have established a reputation in the
international shipping industry for high standards of
performance, reliability and safety. We believe that contracting
with fleet managers that have achieved this reputation will
create greater opportunities for us to seek employment contracts
with well established charterers, many of whom consider the
reputation of the fleet
E-3
manager when entering into charters. We believe we derive
important benefits from our Fleet Managers experience,
which enables them to achieve significant economies of scale and
scalability in areas such as crewing, supply procurement, and
insurance which in addition to other benefits, are passed to us
as the vessel owner. We intend to maintain the quality of our
fleet through our Fleet Managers rigorous maintenance
programs. We believe that owning a fleet of well-maintained
vessels will enable us to operate our vessels with lower
operating costs, maintain their resale value and secure
employment for our vessels with high quality charterers.
Corporate
Structure
OceanFreight Inc. was incorporated on September 11, 2006
under the laws of the Marshall Islands. Our principal executive
offices are at 80 Kifissias Avenue, GR 151 25
Amaroussion, Athens, Greece. Our telephone number at that
address is +30 210 614 0283. Our common shares are listed on The
Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol OCNF. Our
website is www.oceanfreightinc.com. The information on our
website shall not be deemed a part of this document. Our agent
and authorized representative in the United States is
Puglisi & Associates, located at 850 Library Ave,
Newark, DE 19711.
On April 30, 2007, we completed our initial public offering
in the United States the net proceeds of which amounted to
$216.8 million.
Recent
Developments
Our stock price declined below $1.00 per share for a period of
30 consecutive business days, and on January 25, 2011 The
Nasdaq Stock Market notified us that we are not in compliance
with the minimum bid price rule and as a result, we are required
to take action, such as a reverse stock split, prior to
July 25, 2011, in order to comply with this rule. To regain
compliance, our Board of Directors proposed a 20:1 reverse stock
split of our issued and outstanding shares of class A
common stock, which was approved by our shareholders at their
Annual General Meeting held on June 15, 2011. As a result
of the reverse stock split, which was effected on July 6,
2011, every 20 common shares issued and outstanding were
converted into one share. On July 20, 2011, we received
notice from the Nasdaq Stock market that we regained compliance
with the minimum bid price and this noncompliance matter is now
closed.
On July 25, 2011, we signed an addendum to the initial
consultancy agreement with Steel Wheel Investment Limited, or
Steel Wheel, providing for the termination of the agreement upon
completion of the the merger with Dryships Inc., or DryShips,
discussed below. Following the termination of the agreement
Steel Wheel will be entitled to receive $3.9 million (Euro
2.7 million) as provided in the related change of control
clause. The Companys Chief Executive Officer will continue
to provide his services on behalf of Steel Wheel under its
current remuneration fee until the closing of the merger or
December 31, 2011 whichever is latest.
On July 25, 2011we entered into an agreement with TMS Dry
Ltd, or TMS Dry, and TMS Bulkers Ltd., or TMS Bulkers, providing
for the termination of the management agreements with TMS Dry
upon completion of the merger discussed below and TMS Dry will
receive (a) $6.6 million due to the change of control
and waive its contractual entitlement to seek fees for three
years and (b) $2.4 million commission due to the
merger transaction. Following the completion of the merger the
we will enter into ship management agreements for each of the
eleven owned vessels and hulls with TMS Bulkers on terms
identical to those in the management agreements with TMS Dry.
On July 25, 2011, we signed an addendum to the initial
agreement with Vivid Finance Limited, or Vivid, whereas upon
completion of the merger discussed below the agreement will
terminate and we will not be liable to any indemnification to
Vivid.
On July 26, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement
for DryShips to acquire our outstanding shares for a
consideration per share of $19.85, consisting of $11.25 in cash
and 0.52326 of a share of common stock of Ocean Rig UDW Inc., or
Ocean Rig, a global provider of offshore ultra deepwater
drilling services that is 78% owned by DryShips, or Ocean Rig.
The Ocean Rig shares that will be received by our shareholders
will be from currently outstanding shares held by DryShips.
Under the terms of the transaction, the Ocean Rig shares will be
listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market upon the closing of
the merger.
E-4
Based on the July 25, 2011 closing price of 89.00 NOK
($16.44) for the shares of Ocean Rig on the Norwegian OTC, the
transaction consideration reflects a total equity value for us
of approximately $118 million and a total enterprise value
of approximately $239 million, including the assumption of
debt.
The transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of
DryShips and OceanFreight, by the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors of DryShips, which negotiated the proposed
transaction on behalf of DryShips, and by a Special Committee of
independent directors of OceanFreight established to negotiate
the proposed transaction on behalf of OceanFreight.
The public shareholders of OceanFreight will receive the
consideration for their shares pursuant to a merger of
OceanFreight with a subsidiary of DryShips. The completion of
the merger is subject to customary conditions, including
clearance by the Commission of a registration statement to be
filed by Ocean Rig to register the shares being paid by DryShips
in the merger and the listing of those shares on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market. The cash portion of the consideration is
to be financed from DryShips existing cash resources and
is not subject to any financing contingency. The merger is
expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Simultaneously with the execution of the definitive merger
agreement, DryShips, entities controlled by Mr. Anthony
Kandylidis and OceanFreight, entered into a separate purchase
agreement. Under this agreement, DryShips will acquire from the
entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis all their
OceanFreight shares, representing a majority of the outstanding
shares of OceanFreight, for the same consideration per share
that the OceanFreight stockholders will receive in the merger.
This acquisition is scheduled to close four weeks from the
execution of the merger agreement, subject to satisfaction of
certain conditions. DryShips intends to vote the OceanFreight
shares so acquired in favor of the merger, which requires
approval by a majority vote. The Ocean Rig shares to be paid by
DryShips to the entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis will
be subject to a
6-month
lock-up.
On August 22, 2011, the Stockholders Right Agreement that
the Company entered into on April 30, 2008, as amended and
restated on May 26, 2010 and April 8, 2011, was
further amended and restated in connection with the above
transaction such that the acquisition by DryShips of shares of
the Companys Common Stock or interest therein pursuant to
the terms and subject to the conditions of both the Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated July 26, 2011, by and among Basset
Holdings Inc., Steel Wheel, Haywood Finance Limited, the Company
and DryShips and the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
July 26, 2011, by and among DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings
Inc. and the Company, which agreements were unanimously approved
by our Board of Directors in July 2011, shall not cause
DryShips, or any beneficial owner or Affiliate or Associate
thereof, to be considered an Acquiring Person.
The
International Drybulk Shipping Industry
We currently employ each of our six drybulk carriers under time
charter agreements with an average remaining duration of
approximately 39.3 months as of the date of this Report.
The Baltic Dry Index (or BDI), a daily average of charter rates
in 26 shipping routes measured on a time charter and voyage
basis covering Supramax, Panamax and Capesize drybulk carriers,
recovered significantly in 2010 as compared to the low of the
fourth quarter of 2008. For the first six months of 2011 the
average of the BDI was 1,372, which has significantly declined
as compared to the 2010 average of 2,758 and the 2009 average of
2,614.
The decline in the drybulk market since its peak in 2008 has
resulted in lower charter rates for vessels exposed to the spot
market and time charters linked to the BDI. Our drybulk carriers
are presently employed under time charters that are not directly
linked to the BDI. Drybulk vessel values have also rebounded in
part since the steep decline in such vessel value in 2008.
Charter rates and vessel values were affected in 2008 in part by
the lack of availability of credit to finance both vessel
purchases and purchases of commodities carried by sea, resulting
in a decline in cargo shipments, and the excess supply of iron
ore in China which resulted in falling iron ore prices and
increased stockpiles in Chinese ports. The increase in drybulk
vessel values in 2009 resulted primarily from cheaper prices for
raw materials from producing countries like Brazil and Australia
compared to raw materials produced domestically in Asia;
consequently China has increased its imports of raw materials.
In 2008, Chinas iron ore imports comprised approximately
65% of the total volume of iron transported by sea. In 2009,
that number increased to approximately 80%, while in 2010 it
dropped slightly due to global recovery of the steel industry.
There can be no assurance as to how long charter rates and
vessel values will remain at their current levels or whether
they
E-5
will experience significant volatility. Average daily Capesize
rates improved significantly to approximately $42,656 for the
year ended December 31, 2009, but declined to approximately
$33,300 per day in the year ended December 31, 2010 and to
$8,546 in the six month period ended June 30, 2011.
The global drybulk carrier fleet may be divided into four
categories based on a vessels carrying capacity. These
categories consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Capesize vessels, which have carrying capacities of more than
85,000 dwt. These vessels generally operate along long haul iron
ore and coal trade routes. There are relatively few ports around
the world with the infrastructure to accommodate vessels of this
size.
|
|
|
|
Panamax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 60,000 and
85,000 dwt. These vessels carry coal, grains, and, to a lesser
extent, minor bulks, including steel products, forest products
and fertilizers. Panamax vessels are able to pass through the
Panama Canal making them more versatile than larger vessels.
|
|
|
|
Handymax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 35,000 and
60,000 dwt. These vessels operate along a large number of
geographically dispersed global trade routes mainly carrying
grains and minor bulks. Vessels below 60,000 dwt are sometimes
built with on-board cranes enabling them to load and discharge
cargo in countries and ports with limited infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Handysize vessels have a carrying capacity of up to 35,000 dwt.
These vessels carry exclusively minor bulk cargo. Increasingly,
these vessels have operated along regional trading routes.
Handysize vessels are well suited for small ports with length
and draft restrictions that may lack the infrastructure for
cargo loading and unloading.
|
As of July 1, 2011, total newbuilding orders had been
placed for an aggregate of approximately 43.0% of the existing
global drybulk fleet, with deliveries expected during the next
36 months. According to market sources about 50% of the
drybulk fleet is contracted at established yards, while the
other 50% is contracted at yards that are less established and
whose viability may be uncertain. Many analysts expect that
newbuilding orders may experience significant cancellations
and/or
slippage, defined as the difference between newbuilding
deliveries ordered versus actually delivered, in each case due
to a lack of financing in the industry. Market sources indicate
that slippage in the Handysize sector is about 18.4% and about
28.0% in the Capesize sector. The supply of drybulk carriers is
dependent on the delivery of new vessels and the removal of
vessels from the global fleet, either through scrapping or
accidental losses. The level of scrapping activity is generally
a function of scrapping prices in relation to current and
prospective charter market conditions, as well as operating
repair and survey costs. Scrapping in 2009 had been significant
compared to the previous two years, while in 2010 it decreased
due to the recovery of the drybulk market. In 2010, about
5.8 million dwt was removed from the global drybulk fleet
representing 7.3% of the carrying capacity of the total fleet
delivered during the same year. In the first six months of 2011,
approximately 13.0 million dwt was removed from the global
drybulk-fleet representing approximately 27.5% of the carrying
capacity of the total fleet delivered during the same period. As
of the end of December 2010 and June 2011, approximately 22% and
19%, respectively, of the total dry bulk fleet was 20 years
old or older. Many analysts expect scrapping to continue to be a
significant factor in offsetting the total supply of the drybulk
fleet.
Our Loan
Agreements Covenants
As of August 22, 2011, we had a $137.7 million senior
secured credit facility with Nordea Bank Norge ASA, or Nordea,
consisting of Tranche A, a reducing revolving credit
facility of $94.6 million, and Tranche B, a term loan
facility of $43.1 million.
Our existing credit facility agreement contains certain events
of default, such as a change of control, a cross-default with
respect to financial indebtedness or a material adverse effect
on our ability to perform our obligations under the loan or on
any collateral thereunder. Our existing credit facility
agreement also includes, among other covenants, financial
covenants requiring:
|
|
|
|
|
the ratio of funded debt to the sum of funded debt plus
shareholders equity at the end of each fiscal quarter to
be no greater than 0.70 to 1.00;
|
E-6
|
|
|
|
|
liquidity of at least $500,000 per vessel owned. Liquidity is
defined as cash, cash equivalents with maturity of less than
12 months and undrawn availability under Tranche A;
|
|
|
|
the ratio of EBITDA to net interest expense at the end of each
fiscal quarter of at least 2.50 to 1; and
|
|
|
|
the aggregate fair market value of the vessels pledged as
security for this credit facility of at least 125% of the
aggregate outstanding balance of the credit facility
|
This credit facility also contains provisions that prohibit us
from paying dividends. Our board of directors determined in
December 2008 to suspend the payment of dividends in order to
preserve capital.
As at June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the
covenants contained in our senior secured credit facility.
E-7
RISK
FACTORS
Set forth below are updated or additional risk factors which
should be read together with the risk factors contained in our
Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2011.
Company
Specific Risk Factors
Any
delay of or the failure to complete the proposed merger
transaction may significantly reduce the benefits expected to be
obtained from the proposed merger transaction or could adversely
affect the market price of the common shares of the Company or
DryShips Inc. or their future business and financial
results.
The proposed transaction is subject to a number of conditions,
including approval of the Companys shareholders, which is
beyond the control of Company and which may prevent, delay or
otherwise materially and adversely affect completion of the
proposed transaction. Simultaneously with the execution of the
definitive merger agreement, DryShips Inc., entities controlled
by Mr. Anthony Kandylidis and the Company, entered into a
separate purchase agreement. Under this agreement, DryShips Inc.
will acquire from the entities controlled by Mr. Kandylidis
all their OceanFreight Inc. shares, representing a majority of
the outstanding shares of OceanFreight, for the same
consideration per share that the OceanFreight stockholders will
receive in the merger. This acquisition is scheduled to close
four weeks from the execution of the merger agreement, subject
to satisfaction of certain conditions. DryShips Inc. intends to
vote the OceanFreight shares so acquired in favor of the merger,
which requires approval by a majority vote. We cannot predict
whether and when this and other conditions will be satisfied.
Failure to complete the proposed transaction would prevent the
Company and DryShips Inc. from realizing the anticipated
benefits of the proposed transaction. Each company would also
remain liable for significant transaction costs, including
legal, accounting and financial advisory fees. Any delay in
completing the proposed transaction may significantly reduce the
synergies and other benefits that the Company and DryShips Inc.
expect to achieve if they successfully complete the proposed
transaction within the expected timeframe and integrate their
respective businesses.
In addition, the market price of each companys common
stock may reflect various market assumptions as to whether and
when the proposed transaction will be completed. Consequently,
the completion of, the failure to complete, or any delay in the
completion of the proposed transaction could result in a
significant change in the market price of the common shares of
the Company and DryShips Inc.
Fluctuations
in market prices may cause the value of the shares of Ocean Rig
that you receive to be less than the value of your shares of the
Companys common shares.
Upon completion of the proposed transaction, all shares of the
Company will be converted into cash and shares of Ocean Rig. The
ratios at which the shares will be converted are fixed, and
there will be no adjustment for changes in the market price of
either the Companys common shares or Ocean Rigs
common shares. Any change in the price of the Companys
common shares and Ocean Rigs common shares will affect the
value that the Companys shareholders will receive in the
proposed transaction. The common shares of both the Company and
Ocean Rig have historically experienced significant volatility,
and the value of the shares of stock received in the proposed
transaction may go up or down as the market price of the
Companys common shares goes up or down. Stock price
changes may result from a variety of factors that are beyond the
control of the Company and DryShips Inc., including changes in
their businesses, operations and prospects, regulatory
considerations and general market and economic conditions.
Neither party is permitted to walk away from the
proposed transaction or resolicit the vote of its shareholders
solely because of changes in the market prices of common shares
of the Company or Ocean Rig.
The prices of common stock of the Company and Ocean Rig at the
closing of the proposed transaction may vary from their
respective prices on the date of this merger agreement. Because
the date the proposed transaction is completed will be later
than the dates of the merger agreements, the prices of the
common shares of the Company and Ocean Rig on the date of the
merger agreements may not be indicative of their respective
prices on the date the proposed transaction is completed.
E-8
We may
fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger, and the
integration process could adversely impact our ongoing
operations.
We and DryShips Inc. entered into the agreement and plan of
merger with the expectation that the merger would result in
various benefits, including, among other things, improved
purchasing and placing power, an expanded customer base and
ongoing cost savings and operating efficiencies. The success of
the merger will depend, in part, on DryShips Inc.s ability
to realize such anticipated benefits from combining our
businesses with their business. The anticipated benefits and
cost savings of the merger may not be realized fully, or at all,
or may take longer to realize than expected. Failure to achieve
anticipated benefits could result in increased costs and
decreases in the amounts of expected revenues of the combined
company.
We and DryShips Inc. operated independently until the completion
of the merger. It is possible that the integration process could
result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each
companys ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in
standards, controls, procedures or policies that adversely
affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and
employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert
management attention and resources. These integration matters
could have an adverse effect on us and DryShips Inc. during the
transition period. The integration may take longer than
anticipated and may have unanticipated adverse results relating
to our existing business.
A drop
in spot charter rates may provide an incentive for some
charterers to default on their charters.
When we enter into a time or bareboat charter, charter rates
under that charter are fixed for the term of the charter. If the
spot charter rates in the tanker or drybulk shipping industry,
as applicable, become significantly lower than the time charter
equivalent rates that some of our charterers are obligated to
pay us under our existing charters, the charterers may have
incentive to default under that charter or attempt to
renegotiate the charter. If our charterers fail to pay their
obligations, we would have to attempt to re-charter our vessels
at potentially lower charter rates, which may affect our ability
to comply with our loan covenants and operate our vessels
profitably. If we are not able to comply with our loan covenants
and our lenders choose to accelerate our indebtedness and
foreclose their liens, we could be required to sell vessels in
our fleet and our ability to continue to conduct our business
would be impaired.
The
market price of our common shares has fluctuated widely and the
market price of our common shares may fluctuate in the
future.
The market price of our common shares has fluctuated widely
since our initial public offering in April 2007 and may continue
to do so as a result of many factors, including our actual
results of operations and perceived prospects, the prospects of
our competition and of the shipping industry in general and in
particular the drybulk and tanker sectors, differences between
our actual financial and operating results and those expected by
investors and analysts, changes in analysts
recommendations or projections, changes in general valuations
for companies in the shipping industry, particularly the drybulk
and tanker sectors, changes in general economic or market
conditions and broad market fluctuations.
If the market price of our common shares falls below $5.00 per
share, under stock exchange rules, our shareholders will not be
able to use such shares as collateral for borrowing in margin
accounts. This inability to continue to use our common shares as
collateral may lead to sales of such shares creating downward
pressure on and increased volatility in the market price of our
common shares.
In addition, under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, listed
companies are required to maintain a share price of at least
$1.00 per share and if the share price declines below $1.00 for
a period of 30 consecutive business days, then the listed
company would have a cure period of at least 180 days to
regain compliance with the $1.00 per share minimum. If at any
time during this cure period the bid price of the listed
security closes at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum
of ten consecutive business days, the Company would regain
compliance with the minimum bid price requirement.
The Companys stock price declined below $1.00 per share
for a period of 30 consecutive business days, and on
March 1, 2010 the Company received notice from The Nasdaq
Stock Market that it was not in compliance with the
E-9
minimum bid price rule. In order for the Company to regain
compliance, our Board of Directors proposed a 3:1 reverse stock
split, which was approved by the Companys shareholders at
their Annual General Meeting held on June 10, 2010. As a
result of the reverse stock split, which was effected on
June 17, 2010, every three common shares issued and
outstanding were converted into one common share. On
August 6, 2010, the Company received notice from The Nasdaq
Stock Market that it has regained compliance with the minimum
bid price and the noncompliance matter is now closed.
Our stock price declined again below $1.00 per share for a
period of 30 consecutive business days, and on January 25,
2011 we received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market that we are
not in compliance with the minimum bid price rule and as a
result, we are required to take action during the relevant cure
period ending in July 2011, such as a reverse stock split, in
order to comply with Nasdaq rules. In the annual meeting of the
Shareholders to be held on June 15, 2011, the Company
intends to propose an amendment to the Companys Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock
split at a ratio of not less than
one-for-three
and not more than
one-for-twenty.
As a result of the reverse stock split, which was effected on
July 6, 2011, every 20 common shares issued and outstanding
were converted into one common share. On July 20, 2011, we
received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market that it has
regained compliance with the minimum bid price and the
noncompliance matter is now closed.
We do
not have financing arranged to fully cover our remaining
shipyard obligations due for the construction of our five
newbuilding VLOCs.
We own contracts for the construction of five newbuilding VLOCs
scheduled to be delivered to us in the first, second, and fourth
quarters of 2012, and the first quarter of 2013, respectively.
As of June 30, 2011, $82.4 million was paid in
shipyard installments for these hulls, which was partially
financed by the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement
(SEDA) proceeds and an equity issuance in April 2011
of 1,782,849 (35,657,142 before the second reverse stock split)
of our common shares. The remaining shipyard obligations amount
to $234 million as of the date of this report, of which
$19.6 million, $184.7 million and $29.7 million
are payable in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. We expect the
remaining shipyard obligations to be financed by (1) a new
credit facility with a major Chinese bank for which we have
received a commitment letter that contains terms acceptable to
us but not yet entered into definitive documentation, which we
expect will finance up to 60% of the aggregate contract cost of
three of the VLOCs, (2) other forms of external financing;
(3) equity offerings and (4) cash from operations.
However, we have not yet obtained such financing. In the current
challenging financing environment, it may be difficult to obtain
secured debt to finance these purchases or raise debt or equity
in the capital markets. If we fail to secure financing for the
remaining payments due on these five newbuilding VLOCs, we could
also lose all or a portion of our deposit money, which as of
August 22, 2011 amounted to $89.2 million, and we may
incur additional liability and costs.
E-10
PER SHARE
MARKET PRICE INFORMATION
Our common shares have traded on The Nasdaq Global Market under
the symbol OCNF since April 30, 2007.
The table below sets forth the high and low closing prices for
each of the periods indicated for our common shares.
Quoted prices as of July 5, 2011, are prior to our reverse
stock split that went effective on July 6, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2008 Annual
|
|
|
26.70
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
1st
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
5.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
2nd
Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
3rd
Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
4th Quarter
ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
2009 Annual
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
1st
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
2nd
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
3rd
Quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
4th Quarter
ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
2010 Annual
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Six Months
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
February 2011
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
April 2011
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
May 2011
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
June 2011
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
July 1, 2011 to July 5, 2011
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
July 6, 2011 to July 31, 2011
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
E-11
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our financial condition and
results of operations for the six months ended June 30,
2011. Unless otherwise specified herein, references to
OceanFreight Inc. or the Company or
we shall include OceanFreight Inc. and its
applicable subsidiaries. The following managements
discussion and analysis is intended to discuss our financial
condition, changes in financial condition and results of
operations, and should be read in conjunction with our interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements and their notes
included therein.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Reform Act of 1995, as codified in Section 27A of the
U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These forward looking statements reflect our current
views with respect to future events and financial performance.
Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated
in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain
factors among which are the following: (i) charter demand
and/or
charter rates, (ii) production or demand for the types of
drybulk and petroleum products that are transported by the
Companys vessels, or (iii) operating costs including
but not limited to changes in crew salaries, insurance,
provisions, repairs, maintenance and overhead expenses. For
additional information on the Companys financial condition
and results of operation please refer to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2011.
Operating
results
We generate revenues by charging customers for the
transportation of drybulk and crude oil cargoes using our
vessels. We employ our drybulk carriers to reputable charterers
pursuant to long-term time charters, other than the M/T Olinda
which was employed in a spot pool until May 25, 2011 when
it was sold and delivered to its new owners. A time charter is a
contract for the use of a vessel for a specific period of time
during which the charterer pays substantially all of the voyage
expenses, including port and canal charges and the cost of
bunkers (fuel oil), but the vessel owner pays the vessel
operating expenses, including the cost of crewing, insuring,
repairing and maintaining the vessel, the costs of spares and
consumable stores and tonnage taxes. Under a spot-market
charter, the vessel owner pays both the voyage expenses (less
specified amounts covered by the voyage charterer) and the
vessel operating expenses. Under both types of charters we pay
commissions to ship brokers and to in-house brokers associated
with the charterer, depending on the number of brokers involved
with arranging the charter. Vessels operating in the
spot-charter market or under index related time charters can
generate revenues that are less predictable than fixed rate time
charter revenues but may enable us to capture increased profit
margins during periods of improvements in drybulk and tanker
rates. However, we are exposed to the risk of declining drybulk
and tanker rates when operating in the spot market, which may
have a materially adverse impact on our financial performance.
As of August 22, 2011, our charters had remaining terms of
an average of 39 months.
Furthermore, effective May 2009, we engaged in Forward Freight
Agreements (FFA) trading activities. Please see Note 9 to
the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements. As of June 30, 2011, we had no open positions.
As of the date of this report we do not have any open positions.
Factors
Affecting our Results of Operations
We believe that the important measures for analyzing future
trends in our results of operations consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar days. Calendar days are the total
days the vessels were in our possession for the relevant period
including off hire days.
|
|
|
|
Voyage days. Total voyage days are the total
days the vessels were in our possession for the relevant period
net of off hire days.
|
|
|
|
Fleet utilization. Fleet utilization is the
percentage of time that our vessels were available for revenue
generating voyage days, and is determined by dividing voyage
days by fleet calendar days.
|
E-12
|
|
|
|
|
TCE rates. Time charter equivalent, or TCE, is
a measure of the average daily revenue performance of a vessel
on a per voyage basis. TCE is a non-GAAP measure. Our method of
calculating TCE is consistent with industry standards and is
determined by dividing gross revenues (net of voyage expenses)
by voyage days for the relevant time period. Voyage expenses
primarily consist of port, canal and fuel costs that are unique
to a particular voyage, which would otherwise be paid by the
charterer under a time charter contract, as well as commissions.
TCE is a standard shipping industry performance measure used
primarily to compare
period-to-period
changes in a shipping companys performance despite changes
in the mix of charter types (i.e., spot charters, time charters
and bareboat charters) under which the vessels may be employed
between the periods.
|
|
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses, which include crew
costs, provisions, deck and engine stores, lubricating oil,
insurance, maintenance and repairs, are calculated by dividing
vessel operating expenses by fleet calendar days for the
relevant time period.
|
The following table reflects our calendar days, voyage days,
fleet utilization and daily TCE rate for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
Tankers
|
|
Fleet
|
|
Calendar days
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Voyage days
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
Fleet utilization
|
|
|
98.9
|
%
|
|
|
87.9
|
%
|
|
|
97.6
|
%
|
Time charter equivalent (TCE) daily rate
|
|
$
|
21,921
|
|
|
$
|
15,384
|
|
|
$
|
21,254
|
|
The following table reflects the calculation of our TCE daily
rates for the six-month period ended Jun 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Tankers
|
|
|
Fleet
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except for
|
|
|
|
Daily TCE rate)
|
|
|
Voyage revenues
|
|
$
|
28,438
|
|
|
$
|
2,525
|
|
|
$
|
30,963
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(1,804
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(2,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter equivalent revenues
|
|
$
|
26,634
|
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
$
|
28,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total voyage days for fleet
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily TCE rate
|
|
$
|
21,921
|
|
|
$
|
15,384
|
|
|
$
|
21,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Charter Rates. Spot charterhire rates are
volatile and fluctuate on a seasonal and year to year basis. The
fluctuations are caused by imbalances in the availability of
cargoes for shipment and the number of vessels available at any
given time to transport these cargoes.
|
|
|
|
Voyage and Time Charter Revenue. Our revenues
are driven primarily by the number of vessels in our fleet, the
number of days during which our vessels operate and the amount
of daily charterhire rates that our vessels earn under charters,
which, in turn, are affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the duration of our charters;
|
|
|
|
our decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and disposals;
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that we spend positioning our vessels;
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that our vessels spend in drydock undergoing
repairs;
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that our vessels spend in connection with the
maintenance and upgrade work;
|
|
|
|
the age, condition and specifications of our vessels;
|
|
|
|
levels of supply and demand in the drybulk and crude oil
shipping industries; and
|
|
|
|
other factors affecting spot market charterhire rates for
drybulk and tanker vessels.
|
E-13
As of August 22, 2011, we employed our six drybulk carriers
under fixed rate time charter contracts, which had a remaining
duration of a minimum of 22 months and a maximum of
56 months. We believe that these long-term charters provide
better stability of earnings and consequently increase our cash
flow visibility to our shareholders compared to short-term
charters.
Accounting
Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our interim consolidated
unaudited financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States, or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of those
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities,
revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant
judgments or uncertainties, and potentially result in materially
different results under different assumptions and conditions. We
have described below what we believe are our most critical
accounting policies that involve a high degree of judgment and
the methods of their application.
Vessel
Lives and Impairment
The carrying value of each of our vessels represents its
original cost at the time it was delivered or purchased less
depreciation calculated using an estimated useful life of
25 years from the date such vessel was originally delivered
from the shipyard. The actual life of a vessel may be different.
We depreciate our vessels based on a straight-line basis over
the expected useful life of each vessel, based on the cost of
the vessel less its estimated residual value, which is estimated
at $200 per lightweight ton at the date of the vessels
acquisition, which we believe is common in the drybulk and
tanker shipping industries.
Secondhand vessels are depreciated from the date of their
acquisition through their remaining estimated useful life.
However, when regulations place limitations over the ability of
a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is
adjusted to end at the date such regulations become effective.
The carrying values of our vessels including those under
construction may not represent their fair market value at any
point in time since the market prices of second hand vessels
tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and the cost of
newbuildings. Historically, both charter rates and vessel values
tend to be cyclical. We record impairment losses only when
events occur that cause us to believe that future cash flows for
any individual vessel will be less than its carrying value. The
carrying amounts of vessels held and used are reviewed for
potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of a particular vessel may not
be fully recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge
would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted
projected net operating cash flows expected to result from the
use of the vessel and its eventual disposition is less than the
vessels carrying amount. This assessment is made at the
individual vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow
information for each vessel is available. Measurement of the
impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. We
determine the fair value of our assets based on management
estimates and assumptions and by making use of available market
data and taking into consideration third party valuations.
We determine undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for
each vessel and compare it to the vessels carrying value.
In developing estimates of future cash flows, we must make
assumptions about future charter rates, vessel operating
expenses, fleet utilization, and the estimated remaining useful
lives of the vessels. These assumptions are based on historical
trends as well as future expectations. The projected net
operating cash flows are determined by considering the charter
revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days
and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed
days (based on the most recent 10 year historical average
of the six month, one year and three year time charter rates for
drybulk vessels, the three year projected time charter rate for
the first three years and the 10 year historical average of
the one year and three year time charter rates thereafter for
the Suezmax tanker vessel), over the remaining estimated life of
each vessel assuming an annual growth rate of 3.0%, net of
brokerage commission for drybulk vessels and no growth rate for
the tanker vessels. Expected outflows for scheduled
vessels maintenance and vessel operating expenses are
based on historical data,
E-14
and adjusted annually assuming an average annual inflation rate
of 3%. Effective fleet utilization is assumed to be 99% and 97%
for drybulk carriers and tanker vessels, respectively, taking
into account the period(s) each vessel is expected to undergo
her scheduled maintenance (drydocking and special surveys), as
well as an estimate of 1% off hire days each year for drybulk
carriers and 3% for tanker vessels. We have assumed no change in
the remaining estimated useful lives of the current fleet, and
scrap values based on $200 per Light Weight ton, or LWT, at
disposal.
The current assumptions used and the estimates made are highly
subjective, and could be negatively impacted by further
significant deterioration in charter rates or vessel utilization
over the remaining life of the vessels which could require the
Company to record a material impairment charge in future periods.
Acquisition
of vessels
When the Company enters into an acquisition transaction, it
determines whether the acquisition transaction was the purchase
of an asset or a business based on the facts and circumstances
of the transaction. As is customary in the shipping industry,
the purchase of a vessel is normally treated as a purchase of an
asset as the historical operating data for the vessel is not
reviewed nor is material to the Companys decision to make
such acquisition.
Vessels
held for sale
It is the Companys policy to dispose of vessels and other
fixed assets when suitable opportunities arise and not
necessarily to keep them until the end of their useful life. The
Company classifies assets and disposal groups as being held for
sale in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 360,
or ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, when the
following criteria are met: (i) management possessing the
necessary authority has committed to a plan to sell the asset
(disposal group); (ii) the asset (disposal group) is
immediately available for sale on an as is basis;
(iii) an active program to find the buyer and other actions
required to execute the plan to sell the asset (disposal group)
have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset (disposal
group) is probable, and transfer of the asset (disposal group)
is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale
within one year; and (v) the asset (disposal group) is
being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable
in relation to its current fair value and actions required to
complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant
changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be
withdrawn. Long-lived assets or disposal groups classified as
held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount
or fair value. These assets are not depreciated once they meet
the criteria to be held for sale and are classified in current
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet (see Note 4 to our
interim consolidated unaudited financial statements).
Voyage
Revenues
The Company generates its revenues from charterers for the
charter hire of its vessels. Vessels are chartered using either
voyage charters, where a contract is made in the spot market for
the use of a vessel for a specific voyage for a specified
charter rate, or timecharters, where a contract is entered into
for the use of a vessel for a specific period of time and a
specified daily charter hire rate. If a charter agreement exists
and collection of the related revenue is reasonably assured,
revenue is recognized as it is earned ratably during the
duration of the period of each voyage or timecharter. A voyage
is deemed to commence upon the completion of discharge of the
vessels previous cargo and is deemed to end upon the
completion of discharge of the current cargo. Demurrage income
represents payments by a charterer to a vessel owner when
loading or discharging time exceeds the stipulated time in the
voyage charter and is recognized ratably as earned during the
related voyage charters duration period. Unearned revenue
includes cash received prior to the balance sheet date and is
related to revenue earned after such date. For vessels operating
in pooling arrangements, the Company earns a portion of total
revenues generated by the pool, net of expenses incurred by the
pool. The amount allocated to each pool participant vessel,
including the Companys vessels, is determined in
accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula, which is determined by points awarded to each vessel in
the pool based on the vessels age, design and other
performance characteristics. Revenue under pooling arrangements
is accounted for on the accrual basis and is recognized when an
agreement with the pool exists, price is fixed, service is
provided and collectability has been reasonably assured. The
allocation of such net revenue may be subject to future
adjustments by the pool; however historically such changes have
not been material.
E-15
Revenue is based on contracted charter parties and although our
business is with customers who are believed to be of the highest
standard, there is always the possibility of dispute over the
terms. In such circumstances, we will assess the recoverability
of amounts outstanding and a provision is estimated if there is
a possibility of non-recoverability. Although we may believe
that our provisions are based on fair judgment at the time of
their creation, it is possible that an amount under dispute will
not be recovered and the estimated provision of doubtful
accounts would be inadequate. If any of our revenues become
uncollectible these amounts would be written-off at that time.
Accounting
for Voyage Expenses and Vessel Operating Expenses
Voyage related and vessel operating costs are expensed as
incurred. Under a time charter, specified voyage costs, such as
fuel and port charges are paid by the charterer and other
non-specified voyage expenses, such as commissions, are paid by
the Company. Vessel operating costs including crews, vessel
management fees, maintenance and insurance are paid by the
Company. Under a bareboat charter, the charterer assumes
responsibility for all voyage and vessel operating expenses and
risk of operation.
For vessels employed on spot market voyage charters, we incur
voyage expenses that include port and canal charges and bunker
expenses, unlike under time charter employment, where such
expenses are assumed by the charterers.
As is common in the drybulk and crude oil shipping industries,
we pay commissions ranging from 1.25% to 6.25% of the total
daily charter hire rate of each charter to ship brokers
associated with the charterers.
Accounting
for Financial Instruments
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires all derivative
contracts to be recorded at fair value, as determined in
accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, which is more fully discussed in Note 9 to the
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements. The changes in fair value of the derivative contract
are recognized in earnings unless specific hedging criteria are
met. The Company has elected not to apply hedge accounting, but
to account for the change in fair value as an increase or
decrease in earnings.
On January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest swap
agreements with Nordea Bank Finland Plc to partially hedge our
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on
$316.5 million of our long term debt discussed in
Note 7 to the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements, by converting our variable rate debt to
fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the interest swap agreement
we and the bank agreed to exchange, at specified intervals, the
difference between paying a fixed rate at 3.55% and a floating
rate interest amount calculated by reference to the agreed
principal amounts and maturities. The gain or loss derived from
the change in fair value is separately reflected in the
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited statements of
operations.
As of June 30, 2011 and the date of this report, we had no
open FFA positions.
Segment
Disclosures
ASC 280, Segment Reporting, requires descriptive information
about its reportable operating segments. Operating segments, as
defined, are components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly
by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company
reports financial information and evaluates its operations and
operating results by type of vessel and not by the length or
type of ship employment for its customers. The Company does not
use discrete financial information to evaluate the operating
results for each such type of charter. Although revenue can be
identified for different types of charters or for charters with
different duration, management cannot and does not identify
expenses, profitability or other financial information for these
charters.
Furthermore, when the Company charters a vessel to a charterer,
the charterer is free to trade the vessel worldwide and, as a
result, the disclosure of geographic information is
impracticable. Accordingly, the reportable segments of the
company are the tankers segment and the drybulk carriers
segment. See Segment Information in Note 14 to our interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements included herein for
further analysis of our two reportable segments.
E-16
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Please see Note 2 to the accompanying interim consolidated
unaudited financial statements included herein for a discussion
of new accounting pronouncements, which did not have a material
impact on our interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements.
Fleet
employment profile
Please see the information under Our Fleet on
page 2 of this report.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Six-Month
Period Ended June 30, 2011 compared to the Six-Month Period
Ended June 30, 2010
Voyage
Revenue
Voyage revenues for the first six months of 2011 were
$31.0 million, of which, $28.5 million was earned from
our drybulk carriers and $2.5 million was earned from our
tanker vessel. For the same period of 2010, voyage revenues were
$52.8 million of which $36.6 million was earned by our
drybulk carriers and $16.2 million from our tanker vessels.
The decrease in revenues is mainly due to the sale of M/V
Pierre, M/V Augusta, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton, M/T Pink Sands,
M/T Tigani, M/T Tamara and M/T Olinda, which resulted in the
decrease of voyage days from 2,115 days in the first six
months of 2010 to 1,353 days in the same period of 2011.
Furthermore, revenues were further adversely affected by the
decrease of the charter rate of M/V Topeka.
Imputed
Deferred Revenue
The amortization of imputed deferred revenue for the first six
months of each of 2011 and 2010 amounted to $0 and
$1.6 million respectively. Imputed deferred revenue has
fully been amortized as of June 30, 2011 as discussed in
Note 6 to the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements.
Voyage
Expenses
For each of the first six months of 2011 and 2010, our voyage
expenses amounted to $2.2 million and $2.6 million,
respectively. Voyage expenses include bunkers cost to our
charterers for off-hire, brokerage commissions on revenues and
port expenses. The decrease in voyage expense is due to less off
hire days.
Vessel
Operating Expenses
Vessel operating expenses include crew wages and related costs,
the cost of insurance, expenses relating to repairs and
maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores,
management fees, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses.
Vessel operating expenses for the first six months of 2011 were
$12.1 million as compared to $21.6 million for the
same period in 2010. The decrease is mainly due the sale of the
vessels M/V Pierre, M/V Augusta, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton, M/T
Pink Sands, M/T Tigani, M/T Tamara and M/T Olinda, which
resulted in the decrease of calendar days from 2,220 days
in the first six months of 2010 to 1,386 days in the same
period of 2011. The decrease was mitigated by the increase in
management fees due to the change of the fleet managers
resulting in a daily increase from $1,180 per vessel in 2010 to
$2,120 per vessel in 2011. The daily operating expenses on a
fleet basis for the first six months of 2011 were $8,724 per
vessel as compared to $9,708 per vessels for the same period of
2010.
General
and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses include the salaries and
other related costs of the executive officers and other
employees, our office rents, legal and auditing costs,
regulatory compliance costs, other miscellaneous office
expenses, long-term compensation costs, and corporate overhead.
General and administrative expenses for the first six months of
2011 were $3.9 million as compared to $2.7 million for
the same period of 2010. The increase is mainly due to increased
share based compensation cost. Although we report our general
and administrative expenses in U.S. Dollars, some of these
expenses are denominated in other currencies.
E-17
Depreciation
Depreciation for the first six months of 2011 amounted to
$8.3 million as compared to $13.6 million in the same
period of 2010. The decrease in vessel depreciation charges is
attributable to the discontinuance of depreciating the M/V
Augusta, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton, M/T Pink Sands and M/T Tamara,
which were classified as held for sale subsequent to
June 30, 2010 due to their contemplated sale. This decrease
was mitigated by the depreciation of M/V Montecristo which was
acquired in late June 2010 and therefore did not affect the
first six months of 2011.
Drydocking
We did not incur any drydocking costs in the first six months of
2011. In the same period of 2010 we incurred scheduled
drydocking costs of $1.3 million related to M/V Trenton and
M/V Topeka.
Vessel
Lives and Impairment:
The carrying value of each of the Companys vessels
represents its original cost at the time it was delivered or
purchased less depreciation calculated using an estimated useful
life of 25 years from the date such vessel was originally
delivered from the shipyard. The actual useful life of a vessel
may be different. We depreciate our vessels based on a
straight-line basis over the expected useful life of each
vessel, based on the cost of the vessel less its estimated
residual value, which is estimated at $200 per lightweight ton
at the date of the vessels acquisition, which we believe
is common in the drybulk and tanker shipping industries.
Secondhand vessels are depreciated from the date of their
acquisition through their remaining estimated useful life.
However, when regulations place limitations over the ability of
a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is
adjusted to end at the date such regulations become effective.
The carrying values of the Companys vessels including
those under construction may not represent their fair market
value at any point in time since the market prices of second
hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and
the cost of newbuildings. Historically, both charter rates and
vessel values tend to be cyclical. The Company records
impairment losses only when events occur that cause the Company
to believe that future cash flows for any individual vessel will
be less than its carrying value. The carrying amounts of vessels
held and used by the Company are reviewed for potential
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of a particular vessel may not be fully
recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge would be
recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the vessel and its eventual
disposition is less than the vessels carrying amount. This
assessment is made at the individual vessel level as separately
identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available.
Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of
the asset. The Company determines the fair value of its assets
based on management estimates and assumptions and by making use
of available market data and taking into consideration third
party valuations.
In developing estimates of future cash flows, the Company must
make assumptions about future charter rates, ship operating
expenses, vessels residual value and the estimated
remaining useful lives of the vessels. These assumptions are
based on historical trends as well as future expectations.
Although management believes that the assumptions used to
evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate,
such assumptions are highly subjective.
As of June 30, 2011 our impairment analysis did not
indicate any impairment loss on our vessels including those
under construction.
Vessels
held for sale
As of December 31, 2010, vessels held for sale consisted of
M/V Augusta, M/T Tamara, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton and M/T Olinda.
All vessels were delivered to their new owners in the first and
second quarters of 2011. Vessels held for sale are stated at the
prices set forth in the relevant memorandum of agreements or
fair market values less cost to sell (Levels 1 and 2).
E-18
Interest
and finance costs
For the first six months of 2011, interest and finance costs
amounted to $1.9 million. This amount consists of interest
expense of $2.3 million, less capitalized imputed interest
of $0.8 million relating to the construction of the three
VLOCs, amortization and write-off of financing fees of
$0.2 million and other charges of $0.2 million. The
interest paid (excluding swap interest) during the period
amounted to $2.8 million. Effective April 1, 2008, we
have fixed the rates applicable to our outstanding borrowings to
6.05% inclusive of margin (see Quantitative and
Qualitative disclosures about Market Risk-Interest Rate
Risk below). For the same period in 2010, interest and
finance costs amounted to $3.1 million. The interest paid
(excluding swap interest) during the respective period of 2010
amounted to $3.8 million.
Derivative
instruments
Interest Rate Swap Agreements: As of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values
of the derivative contracts amounted to $9.7 million and
$11.6 million in liability, respectively. The decrease in
fair values of $1.9 million is included in Loss on
interest rate swaps in the accompanying 2011 interim
consolidated unaudited statement of operations. The current
portion of the total fair value of $6.3 million (excluding
accrued interest of $1.8 million) is included in current
liabilities as Derivative liability, while the
non-current portion of the total fair value of $3.4 million
is included in non-current liabilities as Derivative
liability in the June 30, 2011, interim consolidated
unaudited balance sheet.
FFAs: During the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, we did not engage in any FFA trading
transactions. For the same period in 2010, the gain on FFAs
amounted to $4.2 million. As of June 30, 2010, we had
no open FFA positions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of funds are equity provided by our
shareholders, operating cash flows and long-term borrowings. Our
principal use of funds has been capital expenditures to
establish and grow our fleet, maintain the quality of our fleet,
comply with international shipping standards and environmental
laws and regulations, fund working capital requirements, make
principal repayments on outstanding loan facilities, and
historically, to pay dividends.
We expect to rely upon operating cash flows, long-term
borrowings, as well as equity financings to implement our growth
plan and our capital commitments discussed in Note 5 to the
accompanying June 30, 2011 interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements. We have financed our capital requirements
with the issuance of equity in connection with our initial
public offering, our controlled equity offering and the Standby
Equity Purchase Agreement, or SEPA, the Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement, or SEDA, and the equity contribution
from Basset Holding Inc. discussed in Note 8 to the
accompanying June 30, 2011 interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements, cash from operations and borrowings under
our long-term arrangements, discussed in Note 7 to the
accompanying June 30, 2011 interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements. Under the SEPA, SEDA and the contribution
from Basset we issued an aggregate of 3,500,925 (70,018,503
before the second reverse stock split) of our common shares with
total net proceeds of $228.1 million. The SEPA and SEDA
were terminated on May 21, 2009 and on March 18, 2010,
respectively.
As of June 30, 2011, we had an outstanding indebtedness of
$142.8 million and our aggregate payments of principal due
within one year amounted to $26.5 million. Our credit
facility contains a minimum cash requirement of $500,000 per
vessel, or $3 million on our current fleet of six vessels,
amounts to $3 million.
As of June 30, 2011, our capital commitments in connection
with the construction of the five VLOCs were
$240.7 million. On February 24, 2011, we signed a
commitment letter with a major Chinese bank for the financing of
up to 60% of the aggregate contract cost for VLOC#1, VLOC#2 and
VLOC#3. We intend to partially finance our capital requirements
with external bank financing, equity offerings and cash from
operations.
Our practice has been to acquire drybulk and tanker carriers
using a combination of funds received from equity investors and
bank debt secured by mortgages on our vessels. Our business is
capital intensive and its future success will depend on our
ability to maintain a high-quality fleet through the acquisition
of newer vessels and the selective
E-19
sale of older vessels. These acquisitions will be principally
subject to managements expectation of future market
conditions as well as our ability to acquire drybulk carriers or
tankers on favorable terms.
Cash
Flows
The following table presents cash flow information for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011. The
information was derived from our interim consolidated unaudited
statements of cash flows and is expressed in thousands of
U.S. Dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
16,433
|
|
|
$
|
5,802
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(53,299
|
)
|
|
|
68,793
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
|
|
(64,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(25,377
|
)
|
|
|
9,726
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
37,272
|
|
|
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
11,895
|
|
|
$
|
19,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011, was $5.8 million as
compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$16.4 million in the same period of 2010. Substantially all
our cash from operating activities is from revenues generated
under our charter agreements. Income from operating activities ,
excluding non cash items, in 2011 was $9.1 million as
compared to $14.1 million in 2010 due to the to the sale of
the M/V Augusta, M/V Trenton, M/V Austin, M/T Pink Sands, M/T
Tigani and M/T Tamara.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011 was $68.8 million which
includes proceeds from the sale of vessels of $85.0 million
and costs in connection with the construction of the three VLOCs
of $16.3 million. Net cash used in investing activities for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was
$53.3 million which includes costs in connection with the
construction of the VLOC#1, VLOC#2 and VLOC#3 of
$46.6 million, payment for the acquisition of M/V
Montecristo of $40.2 million and and net proceeds from the
sale of M/V Pierre and M/V Tigani of $33.5 million.
Net cash used in financing activities for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011 was $64.9 million. During the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011, we (a) paid the
installments due under our senior secured credit facility of
$15.5 million, (b) repaid $51.4 million of our
senior secured credit facility due to the sale of the vessels
M/V Augusta, M/T Tamara, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton and M/T Olinda,
(c) decreased restricted cash by $2.5 million due to
the sale of the above vessels and (d) paid financing costs
of $0.4 million. Net cash provided by financing activities
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was
$11.5 million. During the six-month period ended
June 30, 2010, we (a) generated $19.1 million
from the sale of common shares pursuant to our SEDA and
$20.0 million from the capital contribution of Basset
Holding Inc., (b) paid the installments due under our
senior secured credit facility of $21.3 million,
(c) prepaid the outstanding loan balance of M/T Tigani of
$8.6 million due to its sale, (d) decreased restricted
cash by $2.6 million and (e) paid financing costs of
$0.3 million.
Adjusted
EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and excludes loss on sale of
vessels. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from
operations, as determined by U.S. GAAP and our calculation
of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by
other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is included in this report
because it is a basis upon which we assess our liquidity
position, because it is used by our lenders as a measure of our
compliance with certain loan covenants and because we believe
that adjusted EBITDA presents useful information to investors
regarding our ability to service
and/or incur
indebtedness.
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures and have
limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as
reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
(i) EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in,
or cash requirements for, working capital needs, and
(ii) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash
charges, the assets that are
E-20
depreciated and amortized may need to be replaced in the future,
and EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash
requirement for such capital expenditures. Because of these
limitations, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA should not be considered
as a principal indicator of OceanFreights performance.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating
activities to adjusted EBITDA for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
16,433
|
|
|
$
|
5,802
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in current assets, excluding cash and
cash equivalents and vessel held for sale
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
(6,966
|
)
|
Net (increase)/decrease in current liabilities, excluding
derivative liability, current portion of long term debt and
current portion of imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
|
|
10,293
|
|
Net interest expense(*)
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
5,314
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs included in Net
Interest expense
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
21,013
|
|
|
$
|
14,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Net interest expense includes the realized loss of interest rate
swaps included in Loss on interest rate swaps in the
interim consolidated unaudited statements of operations. |
Working
Capital Position
On June 30, 2011, our current assets totaled
$24.2 million while current liabilities totaled
$43.5 million, resulting in negative working capital
position of $19.3 million. We believe we will generate
sufficient cash and secure the necessary financing during the
next 12 months to make the required principal and interest
payment on our indebtedness, our commitments under the
shipbuilding contracts, provide for our normal working capital
requirements and remain in a positive cash position for at least
one year after June 30, 2011.
Quantitative
and Qualitative disclosures about market risk
Foreign
Currency Risk
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars, but incur
approximately 30.8% of our expenses in currencies other than
U.S. dollars. For accounting purposes, expenses incurred in
Euros are converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate
prevailing on the date of each transaction. At June 30,
2011, the outstanding accounts payable balance denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar was not material.
Inflation
Risk
Inflation does not have significant impact on vessel operating
or other expenses. We may bear the risk of rising fuel prices if
we enter into spot-market charters or other contracts under
which we bear voyage expenses. We do not consider inflation to
be a significant risk to costs in the current and foreseeable
future economic environment. However, should the world economy
be affected by inflationary pressures this could result in
increased operating and financing costs.
Interest
Rate Risk
We are subject to market risks relating to changes in interest
rates, because of our floating rate debt outstanding. On
January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest rate swap
agreements to partially hedge our exposure to variability in
LIBOR rates. Under the terms of our senior secured credit
facility we have fixed our interest rate at 6.05% inclusive of
margin.
The table below provides information about our long-term debt
and derivative financial instruments and other financial
instruments at June 30, 2011 that are sensitive to changes
in interest rates. See Notes 7 and 9 to the
E-21
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements, which provide additional information with respect to
our existing debt agreements and derivative financial
instruments. For debt obligations, the table presents principal
cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by
expected maturity dates. For derivative financial instruments,
the table presents average notional amounts and weighted average
interest rates by expected maturity dates. Notional amounts are
used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under
the contracts. Weighted average interest rates are based on
implied forward rates in the yield curve at the reporting date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars except for percentages)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment amount
|
|
|
26,524
|
|
|
|
116,319
|
|
Variable interest rate
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
Interest rate derivatives(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap notional amount
|
|
|
197,136
|
|
|
|
165,937
|
|
Average pay rate
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
Average receive rate
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See note 7 to our interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements. |
|
(2) |
|
On January 29, 2008, we entered into two interest rate swap
agreements with Nordea Bank Norge ASA, our lending bank, to
partially hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates
on an aggregate notional amount of $316.5 million
($218.3 million as of June 30, 2011), decreasing in
accordance with the debt repayments, by converting the variable
rate of our debt to fixed rate for a period for five years,
effective April 1, 2008. Under the terms of the interest
rate swap agreement, the Company and the bank agreed to
exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between paying
a fixed rate at 3.55% and a floating rate interest amount
calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts and
maturities. These instruments have not been designated as cash
flow hedges, under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and
consequently, the changes in fair value of these instruments are
recorded through earnings. The swap agreements expire in April
2013. |
Research
and development, patents and licenses
We incur from time to time expenditures relating to inspections
for acquiring new vessels that meet our standards. Such
expenditures are insignificant and they are expensed as they
incur.
Concentration
of credit risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally
of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and
derivative contracts (interest rate swaps). The Company places
its cash and cash equivalents, consisting mostly of deposits,
with high credit qualified financial institutions. The Company
performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of
those financial institutions. The Company limits its credit risk
with accounts receivable by performing ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers financial condition. The
Company does not obtain rights to collateral to reduce its
credit risk. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event
of non-performance by counter parties to derivative instruments;
however, the Company limits its exposure by diversifying among
counter parties with high credit ratings.
E-22
Contractual
obligations:
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and
their maturity date going forward as of June 30, 2011 on a
calendar year-end basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
One to
|
|
|
Three to
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
13,262
|
|
|
$
|
53,048
|
|
|
$
|
76,533
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
142,843
|
|
Vessels under construction(2)
|
|
|
26,370
|
|
|
|
214,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,720
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
14,912
|
|
|
|
12,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,904
|
|
Office lease(3)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,023
|
|
|
$
|
282,344
|
|
|
$
|
89,176
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
413,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As further discussed in the June 30, 2011 accompanying
interim consolidated unaudited financial statements the
outstanding balance of our long-term debt at June 30, 2011,
was $142.8 million. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a
margin. Estimated interest payments are not included in the
table above. |
|
(2) |
|
As further discussed in the accompanying June 30, 2011,
interim consolidated unaudited financial statements on
March 4, 2010, we entered into three shipbuilding contracts
with China Shipbuilding Trading Company, Limited, for the
construction of three VLOCs for an aggregate contract price of
$204.3 million. On April 1, 2011, we entered into
additional agreements to purchase, through the acquisition of
their owning companies, two additional VLOCs under construction
at China Shipbuilding Trading Company Limited for an aggregate
contract price of $118.8 million. These vessels are
scheduled for delivery in the first, second and fourth quarters
of 2012 and first quarter of 2013. |
|
(3) |
|
As further explained in our June 30, 2011 interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements, the two lease
agreements for our office facilities in Athens expired on
December 31, 2010. On January 1, 2011 we entered into
a new lease agreement for the current office space with a family
member of Mr. George Economou, which expires on
December 31, 2015. |
E-23
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
INDEX TO
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
E-25
|
|
|
|
|
E-26
|
|
|
|
|
E-27
|
|
|
|
|
E-28
|
|
|
|
|
E-29
|
|
E-24
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
December 31,
2010 and June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
|
$
|
19,275
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
7,925
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
Vessels held for sale
|
|
|
88,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
109,754
|
|
|
|
24,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS, NET:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels under construction
|
|
|
46,618
|
|
|
|
87,438
|
|
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation of $32,284 and $40,418,
respectively
|
|
|
311,144
|
|
|
|
303,010
|
|
Other, net of accumulated depreciation of $382 and $501,
respectively
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets, net
|
|
|
358,359
|
|
|
|
390,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NON CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing fees, net of accumulated amortization of
$2,916 and $3,155, respectively
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
4,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
478,863
|
|
|
$
|
423,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
82,331
|
|
|
$
|
26,524
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
16,693
|
|
|
|
7,377
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
Derivative liability, current portion
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
111,311
|
|
|
|
43,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability, net of current portion
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
3,361
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
127,441
|
|
|
|
116,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
132,316
|
|
|
|
119,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, par value $0.01; 5,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, par value $0.01; 333,333,333 shares
authorized, 4,163,333 and 5,946,182 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011,
respectively
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Subordinated Shares, par value $0.01; 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
500,549
|
|
|
|
526,574
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(265,355
|
)
|
|
|
(266,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
235,236
|
|
|
|
260,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
478,863
|
|
|
$
|
423,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements.
E-25
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenue
|
|
$
|
52,819
|
|
|
$
|
30,963
|
|
Loss on forward freight agreements
|
|
|
(4,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,159
|
|
|
|
30,963
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses
|
|
|
(2,616
|
)
|
|
|
(2,206
|
)
|
Vessels operating expenses
|
|
|
(21,551
|
)
|
|
|
(12,091
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(2,687
|
)
|
|
|
(3,903
|
)
|
Survey and dry-docking costs
|
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(13,581
|
)
|
|
|
(8,253
|
)
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Interest and finance costs
|
|
|
(3,086
|
)
|
|
|
(1,888
|
)
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(6,671
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses, net
|
|
|
(9,647
|
)
|
|
|
(3,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, basic and diluted
|
|
|
3,155,041
|
|
|
|
4,951,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements.
E-26
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except
for share and per share data)
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,640,833
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
460,315
|
|
|
$
|
(203,730
|
)
|
|
$
|
256,611
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
Proceeds from equity offerings, net of related
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335,833
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
19,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,105
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,333
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
Equity contribution, net of related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,334
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,863,333
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
499,846
|
|
|
$
|
(202,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,163,333
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
500,549
|
|
|
$
|
(265,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
235,236
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
Issuance of shares for acquisition of subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782,849
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,603
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,946,182
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
526,574
|
|
|
$
|
(266,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
260,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements.
E-27
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss):
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(881
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
8,253
|
|
Amortization of financing costs
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Amortization of imputed deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of stock based compensation
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
(Gain)/loss on sale of vessels and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
(Gain)/loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
(Increase)/Decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
(4,839
|
)
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(902
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Increase/(Decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
8,470
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(1,715
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(8,045
|
)
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances for vessels under construction and other related costs
|
|
|
(46,623
|
)
|
|
|
(16,217
|
)
|
Advances for vessel acquisition
|
|
|
(40,166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of vessels
|
|
|
33,490
|
|
|
|
85,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by/(used in) Investing Activities
|
|
|
(53,299
|
)
|
|
|
68,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity offerings and contribution, net of related
expenses
|
|
|
39,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long term debt
|
|
|
(21,351
|
)
|
|
|
(15,496
|
)
|
Prepayment of long term debt
|
|
|
(8,562
|
)
|
|
|
(51,433
|
)
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by/(used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
|
|
(64,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(25,377
|
)
|
|
|
9,726
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
37,272
|
|
|
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
11,895
|
|
|
$
|
19,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts
capitalized
|
|
$
|
2,818
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
consolidated unaudited financial statements.
E-28
|
|
1.
|
Basis of
Presentation and General Information:
|
The accompanying interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements include the accounts of OceanFreight Inc.
(OceanFreight) and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company). OceanFreight was
incorporated on September 11, 2006 under the laws of the
republic of the Marshall Islands. In late April 2007,
OceanFreight completed its initial public offering in the United
States under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the net proceeds of which amounted to $216,794. The
Companys common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbol OCNF.
The Company is engaged in the marine transportation of drybulk
and crude oil cargoes through the ownership and operation of
drybulk and tanker vessels. Effective May 2009, the Company is
also engaged in forward freight agreements (FFA) trading
activities.
On June 15, 2010, the technical and commercial management
of the drybulk and the tanker fleets as well as the supervision
of the construction of the five newbuildings Very Large Ore
Carriers (VLOCs) were contracted under separate management
agreements to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd., respectively,
both related technical and commercial management companies
(Note 3). Until June 15, 2010, the technical and
commercial management of the Companys fleet was contracted
under separate management agreements to Cardiff Marine Inc.
(Cardiff), a related technical and commercial
management company (Note 3).
On June 15, 2011, the Companys stockholders approved
a 20:1 reverse stock split, pursuant to which every twenty
shares, of the Companys common stock issued and
outstanding were converted into one share of common stock. The
reverse stock split took effect as of the start of trading on
the NASDAQ Stock Market on July 6, 2011 and reduced the
number of the then issued and outstanding common shares from
118,823,797 common shares to 5,946,182 common shares.
Accordingly, all share and per share amounts have been
retroactively restated to reflect the above changes in capital
structure discussed in Note 8(f).
The accompanying interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the
information and notes required by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. These
statements and the accompanying notes should be read in
conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in
the Companys Annual Report on
Form 20-F
filed with the Securities Exchange and Commission on
April 14, 2011. These interim consolidated unaudited
financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the
annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal
recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the Companys financial position, results
of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Operating results for the six-month period ended June 30,
2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be
expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
E-29
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of June 30, 2011, the Company is the ultimate owner of
all outstanding shares of the following shipowning subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deadweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
(in metric tons)
|
|
Year Built
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Subsidiaries established in the Republic of Marshall
Islands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceanenergy Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Helena
|
|
73,744
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
July 30, 2007
|
Oceantrade Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Topeka
|
|
74,710
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
August 2, 2007
|
Oceanwave Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Partagas
|
|
173,880
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
July 30, 2009
|
Oceanrunner Owners Limited
|
|
M/V Robusto
|
|
173,949
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
October 19, 2009
|
Oceanfire Owners Inc.
|
|
M/V Cohiba
|
|
174,200
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
December 9, 2009
|
Oceanpower Owners Inc
|
|
M/V Montecristo
|
|
180,263
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 28, 2010
|
Amazon Owning Company Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pasifai Owning Company Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceanview Owners Limited(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceansurf Owners Limited(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oceancentury Owners Limited(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freightwise Investment Ltd.(ii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies
with vessels sold
|
|
|
Oceanstrength Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/V Lansing sold on July 1, 2009)
|
Oceanprime Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/V Richmond sold on September 30, 2009)
|
Oceanresources Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/V Juneau sold on October 23, 2009)
|
Oceanwealth Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/V Pierre sold on April 14, 2010)
|
Ocean Faith Owners Inc.
|
|
(owner of M/T Tigani sold on May 4, 2010)
|
Oceanclarity Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/T Pink Sands sold on November 4, 2010)
|
Kifissia Star Owners Inc.
|
|
(owner of M/V Augusta sold on January 6, 2011)
|
Ocean Blue Spirit Owners Inc.
|
|
(owner of M/T Tamara sold on January 13, 2011)
|
Oceanventure Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/V Austin sold on March 10, 2011)
|
Oceanship Owners Limited
|
|
(owner of M/V Trenton sold on March 11, 2011)
|
Oceanfighter Owners Inc.
|
|
(owner of M/T Olinda sold on May 25, 2011)
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries established in the
Republic of Liberia
|
|
|
Oceancentury Owners Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#1
|
Oceansurf Owners Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#2
|
Oceanview Owners Limited
|
|
New Building VLOC#3
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Subsidiaries established for Companys general purposes. |
|
(ii) |
|
Freightwise Investment Ltd. was established in 2009 to engage in
FFA trading activities (Note 9). |
E-30
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 the
following charterers accounted for 10% or more of the
Companys revenues as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Reportable
|
Charterer
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
Segment (Note 14)
|
|
A
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
B
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
A discussion of the Companys significant accounting
policies can be found in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no
material changes to these policies in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2011, except for the following:
Acquisition of vessels: When the Company
enters into an acquisition transaction, it determines whether
the acquisition transaction was the purchase of an asset or a
business based on the facts and circumstances of the
transaction. As is customary in the shipping industry, the
purchase of a vessel is normally treated as a purchase of an
asset as the historical operating data for the vessel is not
reviewed nor is material to the Companys decision to make
such acquisition.
New Accounting Pronouncement: In June 2011,
the FASB issued ASU
2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).The amendments in
this Update require that all nonowner changes in
stockholders equity be presented either in a single
continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate
but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the
first statement should present total net income and its
components followed consecutively by a second statement that
should present total other comprehensive income, the components
of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive
income. For public entities, the amendments are effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted,
because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The
amendments do not require any transition disclosures.
|
|
3.
|
Transactions
with Related Parties:
|
(a) TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers
Ltd.: Following the termination of the management
agreements with Cardiff discussed in Note 3(b), the
Company, effective June 15, 2010, contracted the technical
and commercial management of its drybulk and tanker fleet as
well as the supervision of the construction of the newbuildings
to TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. (the Managers),
respectively. Both companies are beneficially owned by
(a) 30% by a company the beneficial owner of which is
Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis, the mother of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and (b) 70% by a
foundation controlled by Mr. George Economou.
Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis is also the sister of
Mr. George Economou and the wife of one of the
Companys directors, Mr. Konstandinos Kandylidis.
The Managers are engaged under separate vessel management
agreements directly by the Companys respective
wholly-owned vessel owning subsidiaries. Under the vessel
management agreements the Company pays a daily management fee
per vessel, covering also superintendents fee per vessel
plus expenses for any services performed relating to evaluation
of the vessels physical condition, supervision of
shipboard activities or attendance upon repairs and drydockings.
At the beginning of each calendar year, these fees are adjusted
upwards according to the Greek consumer price index. Such
increase cannot be less than 3% and more than 5%. In the event
that the management agreement is terminated for any reason other
than Managers default, the Company will be required
(a) to pay management fees for a further period of three
(3) calendar months as from the date of termination and
(b) to pay an equitable proportion of any severance crew
costs which materialize as per applicable Collective Bargaining
Agreement (CBA).
E-31
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Managers are also entitled to a daily management fee per
vessel of 1,500 ($2.1) and 1,700 ($2.4) for the
drybulk carriers and tanker vessels, respectively. The Managers
are also entitled to (a) a discretionary incentive fee,
(b) extra superintendents fee of 500 ($0.7) per
day (c) a commission of 1.25% on charter hire agreements
that are arranged by the Managers and (d) a commission of
1% of the purchase price on sales or purchases of vessels in the
Companys fleet that are arranged by the Managers. The
U.S. $ figures above are based on the exchange rate at
June 30, 2011. Furthermore, the Managers are entitled to a
supervision fee payable upfront for vessels under construction
equal to 10% of the approved annual budget for supervision cost.
Furthermore, based on the management agreements, as of
June 30, 2011, the Company had made a security payment of
$4,140, representing managed vessels estimated operating
expenses and management fees for three months which will be
settled when the agreements terminate; however, in case of a
change of control of the Company the amount of the security
related to management fees is not refundable. The security
payments to TMS Dry Ltd. have been classified under Other
non-current assets in the accompanying 2011 interim
consolidated unaudited balance sheet.
The fees charged by TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. during the
six month period ended June 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TMS
|
|
|
TMS Tankers
|
|
|
|
Nature of Charge
|
|
Dry Ltd
|
|
|
Ltd.
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
Management fees
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses Statement of
Operations
|
Commission on charterhire agreements
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Voyage expenses Statement of Operations
|
Supervision fee on vessels under construction
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels under construction Balance Sheet
|
At June 30, 2011, $127 and $25 is payable to TMS Dry Ltd.
and TMS Tankers Ltd., respectively, and are reflected in
Due to related parties in the accompanying 2011
interim consolidated unaudited balance sheet. In addition as at
June 30, 2011, $979 and $529 were due to TMS Dry Ltd. and
due from TMS Tankers Ltd., respectively, relating to the
security payment as discussed above and the operations of the
vessels under TMS Dry Ltd. and TMS Tankers Ltd. management are
included in Accounts payable and Prepayments
and other current assets, respectively, in the
accompanying 2011 interim consolidated unaudited balance sheet.
(b) Cardiff Marine Inc.
(Cardiff): Until June 15, 2010,
the Company used the services of Cardiff, a ship management
company with offices in Greece, for the technical and commercial
management of its fleet. The issued and outstanding capital
stock of Cardiff is beneficially owned by (a) 30% by a
company the beneficial owner of which is Mrs. Chryssoula
Kandylidis, the mother of the Companys CEO and
(b) 70% by a foundation controlled by Mr. George
Economou. Mrs. Chryssoula Kandylidis is the sister of
Mr. George Economou and the wife of one of the
Companys directors, Mr. Konstandinos Kandylidis.
Prior to June 15, 2010, Cardiff was engaged under separate
vessel management agreements directly by the Companys
respective wholly-owned vessel owning subsidiaries. Under the
vessel management agreements Cardiff was entitled to a daily
management fee per vessel of 764 ($1.1) and 870
($1.3) for the drybulk carriers and tanker vessels,
respectively. Cardiff also provided, other services pursuant to
a services agreement, which was terminated on June 15,
2010, under which the Company paid fees, including (1) a
financing fee of 0.2% of the amount of any loan, credit
facility, interest rate swap agreement, foreign currency
contract and forward exchange contract arranged by Cardiff,
(2) a commission of 1% of the purchase price on sales or
purchases of vessels in the Companys fleet that are
arranged by Cardiff, (3) a commission of 1.25% of charter
hire agreements arranged by Cardiff, (4) an information
technology fee of 26,363 ($37.9) per quarter and
(5) a fee of 527 ($0.7) per day for superintendent
inspection services in connection with the possible purchase of
a vessel. The U.S. $ figures above are based on the
exchange rate at June 30, 2011. At the beginning of each
calendar year, these fees are adjusted upwards according to the
Greek consumer price index. The Company was also reimbursing
Cardiff for any
out-of-pocket
expenses at cost plus 10%.
E-32
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
In May 2009, the Company entered into a FFA service agreement
with Cardiff, which was terminated on June 15, 2010,
whereby Cardiff was entitled to a 0.15% brokerage commission on
the Companys FFA trading transactions.
Furthermore, based on the management agreements with Cardiff,
the Company, as of June 15, 2010, had made a security
payment of $6,486, representing managed vessels estimated
operating expenses and management fees for three months.
Following the termination of the agreements on June 15,
2010, the security payment was reimbursed to the Company in
September 2010.
The fees charged by Cardiff during the six month period ended
June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of Charge
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
Management fees
|
|
$
|
2,281
|
|
|
Vessels operating expenses - Statement of Operations
|
Commission on charterhire agreements
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
Voyage expenses Statement of Operations
|
Commission on FFA trading
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Loss on forward freight agreements Statement of
Operations
|
Commissions on vessels under construction
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Vessels under construction Balance Sheet
|
Commission on sale of vessel
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of vessels and vessels held for
sale Statement of Operations
|
Mark up upon reimbursement of out of pocket expenses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses Statement of
Operations
|
At December 31, 2010 and June 30 2011, $279 and $690,
respectively were due to Cardiff, relating to the operations of
the vessels under Cardiffs management and are included in
Accounts Payable in the accompanying interim
consolidated unaudited balance sheets.
(c) Vivid Finance Limited
(Vivid): On August 13, 2010, the
Company entered into a consultancy agreement (the
Agreement) with Vivid, a related company organized
under the laws of Cyprus, which is controlled by Mr. George
Economou and of which he may be deemed the beneficial owner.
Vivid serves as the Companys financial consultant on
matters related to (i) new loans and credit facilities with
lenders and financial institutions, (ii) raise of equity or
debt from capital markets, (iii) interest rate swaps
agreements, foreign currency contracts and forward exchange
contracts and (iv) renegotiation of existing loans and
credit facilities. In consideration of these services the
Company will pay Vivid a fee of 0.20% on the total transaction
amount.
The agreement has duration of five years and may be terminated
(i) at the end of its term unless extended by mutual
agreement of the parties; (ii) at any time by the mutual
agreement of the parties; and (iii) by the Company after
providing written notice to Vivid at least 30 days prior to
the actual termination date. As defined in the Agreement, in the
event of a Change of Control Vivid has the option to
terminate the Agreement and cease providing the aforementioned
service within three months from the Change of
Control.
(d) Tri-Ocean Heidmar Tankers LLC (Tri-Ocean
Heidmar): On October 17, 2008, the M/T
Tamara, concurrently with its delivery commenced its time
charter employment with Tri-Ocean Heidmar for a period of
approximately 25 to 29 months at a gross daily rate of $27.
Tri-Ocean Heidmar is owned by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George
Economou is the chairman of the Board of Directors of Heidmar
Inc. and the Companys Chief Executive Officer is a member
of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. The vessel was
redelivered on November 6, 2010. At December 31, 2010
and June 30, 2011, $998 and $68, respectively, included in
Accounts Payable and $123 and nil, respectively,
included in Accrued Liabilities in the accompanying
December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, consolidated
balance sheets are due to the Tri-Ocean Heidmar.
(e) Blue Fin Tankers Inc. pool (Blue
Fin): On October 29, 2008 the M/T
Olinda was employed in the Blue Fin tankers spot pool for
a minimum period of twelve months. Blue Fin is a spot market
pool managed by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George Economou is the
chairman of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. and the
Companys Chief Executive Officer is a member of the Board
of Directors of Heidmar Inc. The vessel, as a pool participant,
is
E-33
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
allocated part of the pools revenues and voyage expenses
on a time charter basis in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula. In October 2008, the Company made an initial advance to
the pool for working capital purposes of $928.4. The vessel was
redelivered from the Pool on May 16, 2011 due to its sale
on May 25, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2011, the Company had a receivable from the pool,
including advances made to the pool for working capital purposes
of $2,198 (of which $63 is included in Receivables
and $2,135 is included in Prepayments and other current
assets) and $1,110 included in Prepayments and other
current assets), respectively, in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. The revenue of M/T Olinda
derived from the pool amounted to $4,379 and $2,417 for the
six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011,
respectively and is included in Voyage revenue in
the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited statements of
operations.
(f) Sigma Tanker Pool
(Sigma): On December 22, 2009
and November 6, 2010, the M/T Tigani and the M/T
Tamara were both employed in the Sigma Tankers Inc. pool
for a minimum period of twelve months each. Sigma is a spot
market pool managed by Heidmar Inc. Mr. George Economou is
the chairman of the Board of Directors of Heidmar Inc. and the
Companys Chief Executive Officer is a member of the Board
of Directors of Heidmar Inc. The vessels, as pool participants,
are allocated part of the pools revenues and voyage
expenses, on a time charter basis, in accordance with an
agreed-upon
formula. The vessels were redelivered from the pool on
April 28, 2010 and January 6, 2011, due to their sale
on May 4, 2010 and January 13, 2011, respectively. As
of December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, the Company
had a receivable from and a payable to the pool of $1,480 and
$64, respectively, which is included in Receivables
and Accounts payable, respectively in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The revenue of the M/T
Tigani and the M/T Tamara derived from the pool
for 2010 amounted to $1,990 and nil, respectively and for 2011
amounted to $54 for each vessel, and is included in Voyage
revenue in the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited
statements of operations.
(g) Lease agreement: The Company had
leased an office space in Athens, Greece from Mr. George
Economou. The lease commenced on April 24, 2007, with a
duration of six months and an option for the Company to extend
it for a further six months. The monthly rental amounted to
Euro 680 ($1.0 at the June 30, 2011 exchange rate).
This agreement was terminated on December 31, 2010. The
rent charged for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010
amounted to $5.4 and is included in General and
Administrative expenses in the accompanying interim
consolidated unaudited statements of operations.
On January 1, 2011, the Company leased an office space in
Athens, Greece, from a family member of Mr. George
Economou. The lease has duration of five years. The monthly
rental for the first two years amounts to Euro 1,000 ($1.44
at the June 30, 2011 exchange rate) and thereafter is
annually adjusted based on the annual inflation rate announced
by the Greek State The rent charged for the six-month period
ended June 30 2011 amounted to $8.4 and is included in
General and Administrative expenses in the
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited statements of
operations.
(h) Capital infusion: On May 28,
2010, Basset Holding Inc., a company controlled by
Mr. Anthony Kandylidis, made an equity contribution of
$20,000 in exchange for approximately 833,334 (50,000,000 before
the reverse stock splits at a price of $0.40 per share) of the
Companys common shares (Note 8(e)).
(i) Steel Wheel Investments
Limited: Under an agreement between the Company
and Steel Wheel Investments Limited (Steel Wheel), a
company controlled by the Companys Chief Executive
Officer, Steel Wheel provides consulting services to the Company
in connection with the duties of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company for an annual fee plus a discretional cash bonus as
approved by the Compensation Committee. Such fees and bonuses
for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011
amounted to $591 and $662 respectively and are included in
General and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Furthermore,
as further discussed in Note 10, certain compensation in
stock was granted to Steel Wheel.
(j) Haywood Finance Limited: On
April 1, 2011 (the acquisition date), the
Company entered into two Share Purchase Agreements
(SPAs) with Haywood Finance Limited
(Haywood or the seller), a company
controlled by the Companys Chief Executive Officer, for
the acquisition of 100% of the share capital of Amazon
E-34
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
Shareholders Limited (Amazon), the direct owner of
all the outstanding shares of Amazon Owning Company Limited
owner of one VLOC (206,000 dwt) under construction (Hull
1239) and Pasifai Shareholders Limited
(Pasifai), the direct owner of all the outstanding
shares of Pasifai Owning Company Limited, owner of one VLOC
(206,000 dwt) under construction (Hull 1240), in exchange of
1,782,849 of Companys common shares (35,657,142 before the
second reverse stock split).
Following the issuance of shares mentioned above the
Companys Chief Executive Officers shareholding in
the Companys common stock increased to 50.5% (30%, 14.6%
and 5.9% through Haywood Finance Limited, Basset Holdings Inc.
and Steel Wheel Investments Limited, respectively).
On the acquisition date, the advances paid to the yard in
respect of the two VLOCs under construction amounted to $23,760
(representing 20% of the total contract cost of $118,800
(Note 5)), while the combined net assets of the entities
acquired amounted to $24,242. The fair value of the shares
issued on the acquisition date was estimated as $24,603 based on
the market closing price of the Companys shares of $0,69
(Level 1 input) as of April, 1, 2011. In determining the
appropriateness of the fair value of the shares issued in
connection with the aforementioned acquisition, the Company
considered the fair value of the two VLOCs under construction
based on independent brokers valuations (Level 2
inputs) amounting to $24,800 (representing 20% of the total
contract fair value of $124,000).
The difference between the net assets of the entities acquired
($24,242) and the fair value of the shares issued ($24,603)
amounted to $361 and is included as an addition to the cost of
vessels under construction in the accompanying interim
consolidated unaudited balance sheet as of June 30, 2011,
in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
805-50-30
Business Combinations, Acquisition of Assets rather than a
Business.
|
|
4.
|
Vessels
held for sale:
|
As of December 31, 2010, vessels held for sale consisted of
the M/T Olinda, the M/T Tamara, the M/V
Augusta, the M/V Austin and the M/V
Trenton. The M/V Augusta was delivered to its new
owners on January 6, 2011, the M/T Tamara on
January 13, 2011, the M/V Austin on March 10,
2011, the M/V Trenton on March 11, 2011 and the M/T
Olinda on May 25, 2011.
|
|
5.
|
Vessels
under construction:
|
On March 8, 2010, the Company concluded three shipbuilding
contracts with China Shipbuilding Trading Company, Limited, for
the constructions of three Capesize Very Large Ore Carriers
(VLOC) with a dwt of 206,000 tons each at a total
contract price of $204,300. The vessels are scheduled for
delivery in the first, second and fourth quarters of 2012. The
construction has been partially financed by the Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement (SEDA) proceeds
(Note 8(b)). Upon delivery the vessels are scheduled to
commence fixed rate employment as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the first vessel at a gross daily hire rate of $25 for a minimum
period of three years;
|
|
|
|
the second vessel at a gross daily hire rate of $23 for a
minimum period of five years. The time charter agreement also
provides for 50% profit sharing arrangement when the daily
Capesize average time charter rate, as defined in the charter
party, is between $23 and $40 per day; and
|
|
|
|
the third vessel at a gross daily hire rate of $21.5 for a
period of seven years. The time charter agreement also provides
for a 50% profit sharing arrangement when the daily Capesize
average time charter rate, as defined in the charter party, is
between $21.5 and $38 per day.
|
On February 24, 2011, the Company accepted a commitment
letter with a major Chinese bank for the financing of up to 60%
of the aggregate contract cost of the three VLOCs discussed above
E-35
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
On April 1, 2011, the Company entered into two agreements
to purchase two VLOC vessels under construction of 206,000 DWT
each, through the acquisition of the shares of Amazon and
Pasifai, the relevant owning companies, from Haywood in exchange
for an aggregate of 1,782,849 (35,657,142 common shares before
the second reverse stock split) common shares of the Company.
The shipbuilding contracts are with China Shipbuilding Trading
Company and total contract price for both vessels is $118,800
(Note 3(j)). The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the
fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013.
As of June 30, 2011, the amounts paid to the yard, as
provided in the shipbuilding agreements, amounted to $82,380,
which together with other related costs of $5,058, including
commissions and supervision cost of $450 and $2,324,
respectively paid to Cardiff and TMS Dry Ltd (Note 3), are
included in Vessels under construction in the
accompanying June 30, 2011 interim consolidated unaudited
balance sheet. As of June 30, 2011, the total outstanding
yard payments amount to $240.7 million (Note 12).
The amount in the accompanying June 30, 2011 interim
consolidated unaudited balance sheet is analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
343,428
|
|
|
$
|
(32,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
311,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,134
|
)
|
|
|
(8,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
343,428
|
|
|
$
|
(40,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
303,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The memoranda of agreement associated with the acquisition of
vessels, M/V Austin, M/V Pierre, M/V Trenton
and M/V Topeka in 2007 stipulated that the vessels
were delivered to the Company with their current charter parties
expiring in 2010. The assumed charters were below market charter
rates at the time of the delivery and, accordingly, a portion of
the consideration paid for the vessels was allocated to the
assumed charters to the extent that each vessels
capitalized cost would not exceed its fair value without a time
charter contract.
The Company recorded imputed deferred revenue totaling $31,346,
with a corresponding increase in the vessels purchase
price, which is being amortized to revenue on a straight-line
basis during the remaining duration of the corresponding
charter. The amortization of imputed deferred revenue for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 amounted to
$1,558 and nil, respectively and is separately reflected in the
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited statements of
operations. As of June 30, 2011, the imputed deferred
revenue was fully amortized.
All the Companys vessels, except for the five new-building
VLOCs discussed in Note 5, have been pledged as collateral
to secure the bank loans discussed in Note 7.
E-36
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of June 30, 2011, the vessels were operating under time
charters, the last of which expires in May 2018. Contracts with
expected duration in excess of one year as of June 30,
2011, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Time Charter
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Rate
|
|
|
Vessel Name
|
|
(in U.S. Dollars)
|
|
Estimated Expiration of Charter*
|
|
Drybulk Carriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Robusto
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
|
August 2014 March 2018
|
M/V Cohiba
|
|
$
|
26,250
|
|
|
October 2014 May 2018
|
M/V Partagas
|
|
$
|
27,500
|
|
|
July 2012 December 2012
|
M/V Montecristo
|
|
$
|
23,500
|
|
|
May 2014 January 2018
|
M/V Topeka
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
January 2012 April 2013
|
M/V Helena
|
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
|
May 2012 October 2016
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Estimated Expiration of Charter provides the estimated
latest redelivery dates presented above at the end of any
redelivery optional periods. |
As of June 30, 2011, the Companys long-term debt
totaled $142,843 ($209,772 as of December 31,
2010) relating to a credit facility with Nordea Bank Norge
ASA (Facility or Nordea Credit Facility)
and a term loan with DVB Bank SE (loan or DVB
loan) which was fully repaid on January 5, 2011.
Credit
Facility with Nordea Bank Norge ASA
On September 18, 2007, the Company entered into an
agreement with Nordea Bank Norge ASA (Nordea) for a
$325,000 Senior Secured Credit Facility for the purpose of
refinancing the then outstanding balance of $118,000 of a
facility with Fortis Bank concluded in June 2007, to partially
finance the acquisition cost of vessels M/V Trenton, M/V
Pierre, M/V Austin, M/V Juneau, M/V
Lansing, M/V Helena, M/V Topeka, M/V
Richmond and M/T Pink Sands and financing the
acquisition of additional vessels. On January 9, 2009, the
Company entered into an amendatory agreement to the Nordea
credit facility which became effective on January 23, 2009
and waived the breach of the collateral maintenance coverage
ratio covenant contained in such credit facility resulting from
the decrease in the market value of the Companys vessels
and reduced the level of the collateral maintenance coverage
ratio for the remaining term of the agreement. The waiver was
effective from the date the breach occurred, which was
December 9, 2008. Under the terms of the amendatory
agreement the Company on January 23, 2009, made a
prepayment of $25,000 and, among other requirements, is also
required (i) to ensure that under the reduced collateral
maintenance coverage ratio, the aggregate fair market value of
the vessels in the Companys fleet other than the M/T
Tamara and M/T Tigani, plus proceeds from a
vessels sale or insurance proceeds from a vessels
loss, and the excess of the fair market value of each of the M/T
Tamara and M/T Tigani over the recorded amount of
the first priority ship mortgage over each such vessel under the
Companys DVB loan, described below, be not less than
(a) 90% of the aggregate outstanding balance under the
Nordea credit facility plus any unutilized commitment in respect
of Tranche A until June 30, 2009, (b) 100% of the
aggregate outstanding balance under the Nordea credit facility
plus any unutilized commitment in respect of Tranche A from
July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, (c) 110% of
the aggregate outstanding balance under the Nordea credit
facility plus any unutilized commitment in respect of
Tranche A from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010,
(d) 115% of the aggregate outstanding balance under the
Nordea credit facility plus any unutilized commitment in respect
of Tranche A from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010,
and (e) 125% of the aggregate outstanding balance under the
Nordea credit facility plus any unutilized commitment in respect
of Tranche A at all times thereafter; (ii) to pay
interest at an increased margin over LIBOR; (iii) to
suspend the payment of dividends; and (iv) to pay the
sellers credit for M/T Tigani and M/T Tamara acquisition
only with the proceeds of new equity offerings or, common
shares, which the seller may request at any time, (v) from
the closing date and until all commitments are terminated and
all amounts due under the Facility have been repaid, the
E-37
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
weighted average age of the vessels (weighted by the fair market
value of the vessels) shall not exceed 18 years; if any
vessel reaches the age of 21 years or more during this
period, such vessel shall be assigned no value in the
calculation of the aggregate fair market value of the vessels
and (vi) liquidity must be at least $500 multiplied by the
number of vessels owned.
As provided in the amendatory agreement to the Nordea Credit
Facility, in the case of a sale of a vessel the Company has the
option of either using the sale proceeds for the prepayment of
the facility or depositing such proceeds in an escrow account
pledged in favor of Nordea and using the funds to finance the
purchase of a new vessel of the same type or better within
90 days. The Company made use of this option and used the
sale proceeds of the M/V Lansing, M/V Richmond,
M/V Juneau and M/V Pierre to partially finance
the acquisition of M/V Partagas, M/V Robusto, M/V
Cohiba and M/V Montecristo, respectively.
The amended Facility is comprised of the following two Tranches
and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin.
Tranche A is a reducing revolving credit facility in a
maximum amount of $200,000 of which the Company utilized
$199,000 to repay the outstanding balance of the credit facility
with Fortis of $118,000 to partially finance the acquisition of
vessels and for working capital purposes. As of June 30,
2011, following the mandatory prepayment of $31,803 due to the
sale of M/V Augusta, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton
and M/T Olinda (Note 4), the balance of
Tranche A of $94,599 will be reduced or repaid in eight
semi-annual equal installments in the amount of $8,130 each and
a balloon installment in an amount of $29,559.
Tranche B is a Term Loan Facility in a maximum amount of
$125,000 which was fully utilized to partially finance the
acquisition of vessels. As of June 30, 2011, following the
mandatory prepayment of $15,224 due to the sale of M/V
Augusta, M/V Austin, M/V Trenton and M/T
Olinda (Note 4), the balance of Tranche B of
$48,244 is repayable in nine equal consecutive semi-annual
installments in the amount of $5,132 each and a balloon
installment in the amount of $2,056.
The Facility is secured with first priority mortgages over the
vessels, first priority assignment of vessels insurances
and earnings, specific assignment of the time-charters, first
priority pledges over the operating and retention accounts,
corporate guarantee and pledge of shares.
Term
Loan with DVB Bank SE
On December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a loan
agreement with DVB Bank SE (DVB) for a new secured
term loan facility for an amount of $29.56 million, which
was fully drawn in January 2009. The Company used the proceeds
of the loan to make the prepayment in the amount of
$25.0 million under its amendatory agreement to its Nordea
credit facility. On May 4, 2010, the M/T Tigani was
sold and as provided in the loan agreement a mandatory
prepayment of the loan of $8,562 was made, which proportionally
reduced the then outstanding loan installments. On
December 17, 2010, the Company signed a Memorandum of
Agreement for the sale of M/T Tamara. The vessel was
delivered to its new owners on January 13, 2011. The
balance of the loan at December 31, 2010 of $4,406 was
fully repaid following the sale of M/T Tamara.
E-38
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
The principal payments required to be made after June 30,
2011 for the long-term debt discussed above are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nordea
|
|
|
Nordea
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Tranche A
|
|
|
Tranche B
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,130
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
13,262
|
|
2012
|
|
|
16,259
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
|
|
26,524
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16,259
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
|
|
26,524
|
|
2014
|
|
|
16,259
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
|
|
26,524
|
|
2015
|
|
|
37,692
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
50,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,599
|
|
|
$
|
48,244
|
|
|
$
|
142,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on long-term debt for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 amounted to $3,536 and
$2,341, respectively, and is included in Interest and
finance costs (Note 13) in the accompanying
interim consolidated unaudited statements of operations. The
Companys weighted average interest rates (including the
margin) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2011 were 2.82% and 2.80%, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Common
Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital:
|
(a) Stockholders Rights
Agreement: On April 17, 2008, the
Company approved a Stockholders Rights Agreement with
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent, effective as of April 30, 2008. Under this
Agreement, the Company declared a dividend payable of one
preferred share purchase right, or Right, to purchase one
one-thousandth of a share of the Companys Series A
Participating Preferred Stock for each outstanding share of
OceanFreight Inc. Class A common stock, par value
U.S. $0.01 per share. The Rights will separate from the
common stock and become exercisable after (1) the
10th day after public announcement that a person or group
acquires ownership of 20% or more of the Companys common
stock or (2) the 10th business day (or such later date
as determined by the Companys board of directors) after a
person or group announces a tender or exchange offer which would
result in that person or group holding 20% or more of the
Companys common stock. On the distribution date, each
holder of a Right will be entitled to purchase for $100 (the
Exercise Price) a fraction (1/1000th) of one share
of the Companys preferred stock which has similar economic
terms as one share of common stock. If an acquiring person (an
Acquiring Person) acquires more than 20% of the
Companys common stock then each holder of a Right (except
an Acquiring Person) will be entitled to buy at the exercise
price, a number of shares of the Companys common stock
which has a market value of twice the exercise price. Any time
after the date an Acquiring Person obtains more than 20% of the
Companys common stock and before that Acquiring Person
acquires more than 50% of the Companys outstanding common
stock, the Company may exchange each Right owned by all other
Rights holders, in whole or in part, for one share of the
Companys common stock. The Company can redeem the Rights
at any time on or prior to the earlier of a public announcement
that a person has acquired ownership of 20% or more of the
Companys common stock, or the expiration date. The Rights
expire on the earliest of (1) May 12, 2018 or
(2) the exchange or redemption of the Rights as described
above. The terms of the rights and the Stockholders Rights
Agreement may be amended without the consent of the Rights
holders at any time on or prior to the Distribution Date. After
the Distribution Date, the terms of the rights and the
Stockholders Rights Agreement may be amended to make changes
that do not adversely affect the rights of the Rights holders
(other than the Acquiring Person). The Rights do not have any
voting rights. The Rights have the benefit of certain customary
anti-dilution protections.
Under the Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement
effective May 26, 2010, the purchase by Basset Holdings
Inc. (Basset), a company controlled by
Mr. Anthony Kandylidis, the Companys CEO, of shares
of the Companys Common Stock directly from the Company in
a transaction approved by the Companys Board of Directors
in May 2010, shall not cause Basset Holdings Inc., or any
beneficial owner or Affiliate or Associate thereof, to be
considered an Acquiring Person; provided, however,
that should Basset or any Affiliate or Associate
E-39
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
of Basset thereafter acquire additional shares of Common Stock
constituting 1% or more of the Companys Common Stock then
outstanding, and thereby beneficially own 20% or more of the
Companys Common Stock then outstanding, other than by
reason of an equity incentive award issued to Basset or such
Affiliate or Associate by the Companys Board of Directors
or a duly constituted committee thereof, then such Person shall
be deemed an Acquiring Person for purposes of this
Agreement.
On April 8, 2011, the Stockholders Right Agreement that the
Company entered into on April 30, 2008, was amended and
restated in connection with the above transaction such that
Haywood would not fall within the definition of Acquiring
Person under the agreement.
(b) Standby Equity Distribution Agreement
(SEDA): On July 24, 2009, the
Company entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, or
the SEDA, with YA Global, pursuant to which the Company may
offer and sell up to $450,000 of the Companys common
shares to YA Global. The SEDA commenced on September 28,
2009 and terminated on March 18, 2010. YA Global was
entitled to receive a discount equal to 1.5%. As of
December 31, 2009, 1,134,258 (68,055,508 before the two
reverse stock splits) common shares had been sold with net
proceeds amounting to $78,970. During the period from
January 1, 2010 to March 18, 2010, 335,883 (20,150,000
before the two reverse stock splits) common shares were sold
with net proceeds of $19,257. During the period from the
commencement of the offering on September 28, 2009 to the
termination of the offering on March 18, 2010, the Company
sold 1,470,092 (88,205,508 before the two reverse stock splits)
common shares with net proceeds amounting to $98,227 and YA
Global received a discount equal to 1.5% of the gross proceeds
or $1,496.
(c) Shelf Registration Statement: On
January 12, 2010, the Company filed a shelf registration
statement on
Form F-3,
which was declared effective on January 21, 2010, pursuant
to which it may sell up to $400,000 of an undeterminable number
of securities.
(d) Equity Incentive Plan (2010 Equity
Incentive Plan): On January 14, 2010,
the Companys Board of Directors adopted and approved the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan, under which 500,000 (30,000,000
before the two reverse stock splits) common shares were reserved
for issuance. On January 18, 2010, the Companys Board
of Directors adopted and approved in all respects the
resolutions of the meetings of the Compensation Committee held
on January 15, 2010, pursuant to which 50,000 (3,000,000
before the two reverse stock splits) common shares were awarded
to Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a company controlled by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and 3,333 (200,000 before
the two reverse stock splits) common shares were awarded to the
Companys Directors and officers. On December 17,
2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved in all
respects the resolutions of the meetings of the Compensation
Committee held on December 17, 2010, pursuant to which
300,000 (6,000,000 before the second reverse stock split) were
awarded to Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a company controlled
by the Companys Chief Executive Officer.
(e) Equity Infusion: On May 25,
2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved an equity
infusion of $20,000 by Basset Holdings Inc.
(Basset), a company controlled by Mr. Anthony
Kandylidis the Companys CEO, in order to fund the
Companys capital needs for the purchase of M/V
Montecristo. On May 28, 2010, Basset paid the amount
of $20,000 in exchange for approximately 833,333 (50,000,000
before the two reverse stock splits at a price of $0.40 per
share) of the Companys common shares. In determining the
fair value of the shares to be issued in connection with the
equity infusion, the Company used multiple inputs from different
sources, including: (a) analyst target prices,
(b) multiples-based valuation and (c) net asset value
method. The Company considered the results of such analyses,
together with: (1) the importance of the equity infusion,
(2) the size of the equity infusion versus the limited
market liquidity, and (3) the opportunity cost of the
capital contribution for other similar investment opportunities.
Given the specific circumstances of the equity infusion, the
results of the analysis and the factors described above, the
Company approved the equity infusion of $20,000 in exchange of
approximately 833,333 (50,000,000 before the two reverse stock
splits effect) of the Companys common shares at a price of
$0.40 per share before the reverse stock split effect.
E-40
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
On May 26, 2010, the Stockholders Right Agreement that the
Company entered into on April 30, 2008, was amended and
restated in connection with the above transaction such that
Basset would not fall within the definition of Acquiring
Person under the agreement.
(f) Share Price and Reverse Stock
Split: Under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock
Market, listed companies are required to maintain a share price
of at least $1.00 per share and if the closing share price stays
below $1.00 for a period of 30 consecutive business days, then
the listed company would have a cure period of at least
180 days to regain compliance with the $1.00 per share
minimum. In the event the Company does not regain compliance
within the period of 180 days, its securities will be
subject to delisting. In addition if the market price of the
common shares remains below $5.00 per share, under stock
exchange rules, the Companys shareholders will not be able
to use such shares as collateral for borrowing in margin
accounts. The Companys stock price declined below $1.00
per share for a period of 30 consecutive business days, and on
March 1, 2010 the Company received notice from the Nasdaq
Stock Market that it was not in compliance with the minimum bid
price rule. In order for the Company to regain compliance, its
Board of Directors proposed a 3:1 reverse stock split, which
automatically converted three current shares of the
Companys class A common shares into one new share of
common stock. The reverse stock split was approved by the
Companys shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held
on June 10, 2010. The reverse stock split took effect on
June 17, 2010 and accordingly, the Companys
authorized Class A common stock was converted to
333,333,333 shares, and the then issued and outstanding
common stock of 231,800,001 common shares was converted to
77,266,655 common shares. Following the reverse stock split the
Companys stock remained above $1.00 for a period of 10
consecutive business days and, as a result, on August 6,
2010, the Company received notice from the Nasdaq Stock market
that it had regained compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement and the compliance matter was closed.
The Company on January 25, 2011, received again notice from
the Nasdaq Stock Market that it was not in compliance with the
minimum bid price rule. Accordingly, as explained above the
Company must regain compliance within a period of 180 days.
In order for the Company to regain compliance, its Board of
Directors proposed a 20:1 reverse stock split of the
Companys issued and outstanding shares of class A
common stock, which automatically converted 20 current shares of
the Companys class A common shares into one new share
of common stock. The reverse stock split was approved by the
Companys shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held
on June 15, 2011. The reverse stock split took effect on
July 6, 2011 and accordingly, the then Companys then
issued and outstanding common stock of 118,823,797 common shares
was converted to 5,946,182 common shares, with the
Companys authorized Class A common stock remaining
unchanged. Following the reverse stock split the Companys
stock remained above $1.00 for a period of 10 consecutive
business days and, as a result, on July 20, 2011, the
Company received notice from the Nasdaq Stock market that it had
regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement and
the compliance matter was closed.
(g) Haywood shares: On April 1,
2011, the Company entered into two agreements to purchase two
VLOC vessels under construction of 206,000 DWT each, through the
acquisition of the shares of Amazon and Pasifai, the relevant
owning companies, from Haywood in exchange for an aggregate of
1,782,857 (35,657,142 common shares before the second reverse
stock split) common shares of the Company (Notes 1, 3(j)
and 5).
On April 8, 2011, the Stockholders Right Agreement that the
Company entered into on April 30, 2008, was amended and
restated in connection with the above transaction such that
Haywood would not fall within the definition of Acquiring
Person under the agreement.
As of June 30, 2011, the Companys issued and
outstanding stock amounted to 5,946,182 (118,823,797 before the
second reverse stock split) common shares. Common share
shareholders are entitled to one vote on all matters submitted
to a vote of shareholders and to receive interest, if any.
E-41
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Derivatives
and Fair Value Measurements:
|
Interest
rate swaps
On January 29, 2008, the Company entered into two interest
rate swap agreements with Nordea, the Companys lending
bank, to partially hedge its exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates on a notional amount of $316,500 ($218,278 as of
June 30, 2011), decreasing in accordance with the debt
repayments, by converting the variable rate of its debt to fixed
rate for a period for 5 years, effective April 1,
2008. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement the
Company and the bank agreed to exchange at specified intervals,
the difference between paying a fixed rate at 3.55% and a
floating rate interest amount calculated by reference to the
agreed notional amounts and maturities. These instruments have
not been designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging and, consequently, the changes in fair
value of these instruments are recorded through earnings. The
fair value of these instruments at June 30, 2011, was
determined based on observable Level 2 inputs, as defined
in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data. Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets,
liabilities (risk adjusted) and market-corroborated inputs, such
as market comparables, interest rates, yield curves and other
items that allow value to be determined.
The fair value of these instruments at June 30, 2011
amounted to a liability of $9,687 (excluding accrued interest
payable of $1,771), of which the current and non-current
portions of $6,326 and $3,361, respectively, are included in
current and non-current derivative liabilities in the
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited balance sheet as of
June 30, 2011. The fair value of these instruments at
December 31, 2010 amounted to a liability of $11,602
(excluding accrued interest of $1,947), of which the current and
non-current portions of $6,727 and $4,875, respectively, are
included in current and noncurrent derivative liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2010. The unrealized result of the change in the fair value of
these instruments for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2011, resulted in an unrealized loss of $2,388 and an
unrealized gain of $1,915, respectively, and are included in
Loss on interest rate swaps in the accompanying
interim consolidated unaudited statements of operations. The
realized interest expense on the swap for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 amounted to $4,284 and $3,656,
respectively, and is included in Loss on interest rate
swaps in the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited
statements of operations.
The realized loss as of June 31, 2010, amounting to $4,284
previously included in Interest and finance costs
(Note 13) was reclassified to Loss on interest
rate swaps to conform to the June 30, 2011
presentation.
Forward
Freight Agreements (FFAs)
In May 2009, the Company engaged in forward freight agreements
(FFA) trading activities. The Company trades in the FFAs market
with both an objective to utilize them as economic hedging
instruments in reducing the risk on specific vessel(s), freight
commitments, or the overall fleet or operations, and to take
advantage of short term fluctuations in the market prices. FFAs
trading generally have not qualified as hedges for accounting
purposes and as such, the trading of FFAs could lead to material
fluctuations in the Companys reported results from
operations on a period to period basis. The open positions of
FFAs are marked to market quarterly, using quoted
prices in active markets for identical instruments (Level 1
inputs), to determine the fair values, which on June 30,
2010, generated unrealized losses of $116 and are included in
Loss on forward freight agreements in the
accompanying 2010 consolidated unaudited statement of
operations. As of June 30, 2011 all FFA positions had been
closed.
Fair
value measurements
The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying interim
consolidated unaudited balance sheet of financial assets and
accounts payable approximate their respective fair values due to
the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of
long-term bank loans with variable interest rates approximate
the recorded values, generally due to their variable interest
rates.
E-42
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables set forth by level our assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and
non-recurring basis. As required by the fair value guidance,
assets and liabilities and are categorized in their entirety
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
Recurring Measurements
|
|
Total
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Interest rate swaps liability position
|
|
$
|
9,687
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,687
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,687
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,687
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Stock
based compensation:
|
On January 14, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, under which
166,667 (10,000,000 before the reverse stock splits) common
shares were reserved for issuance. On January 18, 2010, the
Companys Board of Directors adopted and approved in all
respects the resolutions of the meetings of the Compensation
Committee held on January 15, 2010, pursuant to which
50,000 (3,000,000 before the reverse stock splits) common shares
were awarded to Steel Wheel Investments Limited, a company
controlled by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
3,333 (200,000 before the reverse stock splits) common shares
were awarded to the Companys Directors and officers. On
December 17, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted and approved the resolutions of the meeting of the
Compensation Committee held on December 17, 2010, pursuant
to which 300,000 (6,000,000 before the second reverse stock
split) common shares were awarded to Steel Wheel Investments
Limited, a company controlled by the Companys Chief
Executive Officer.
There were 335,222 (6,704,445 before the second reverse stock
split) unvested shares as of June 30, 2011. Compensation
cost recognized in the six-month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2011, amounted to $485, and $1,440, respectively. As of
June 30, 2011, the compensation cost related to non-vested
shares amounted to $7,708 with a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 26 months.
Under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands, Cyprus,
Liberia and Malta, the companies are not subject to tax on
international shipping income; however, they are subject to
registration and tonnage taxes, which have been included in
vessel operating expenses in the accompanying interim
consolidated unaudited statement of operations.
Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of the United States (the
Code), U.S. source income from the
international operations of ships is generally exempt from
U.S. tax if the company operating the ships meets both of
the following requirements: (a) the Company is organized in
a foreign country that grants an equivalent exemption to
corporations organized in the United States and (b) either
(i) more than 50% of the value of the Companys stock
is owned, directly or indirectly, by individuals who are
residents of the Companys country of
organization or of another foreign country that grants an
equivalent exemption to corporations organized in
the United States (50% Ownership Test) or (ii) the
Companys stock is primarily and regularly traded on
an established securities market in its country of
organization, in another country that grants an equivalent
exemption to United States corporations, or in the United
States (Publicly-Traded Test).
Under the regulations, the Companys stock will be
considered to be regularly traded on an established
securities market if (i) one or more classes of its stock
representing 50 percent or more of its outstanding shares,
by voting power and value, is listed on the market and is traded
on the market, other than in minimal quantities, on at least
60 days during the taxable year; and (ii) the
aggregate number of shares of our stock traded during the
taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of shares of
the stock outstanding during the taxable year. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the regulations provide, in pertinent part, that
each class of the Companys stock will not be
E-43
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
considered to be regularly traded on an established
securities market for any taxable year in which 50% or more of
the vote and value of the outstanding shares of such class are
owned, actually or constructively under specified stock
attribution rules, on more than half the days during the taxable
year by persons who each own 5% or more of the value of such
class of the Companys outstanding stock
(5 Percent Override Rule).
In the event the 5 Percent Override Rule is triggered, the
regulations provide that the 5 Percent Override Rule will
nevertheless not apply if the Company can establish that among
the closely-held group of 5% Stockholders, there are sufficient
5% Stockholders that are considered to be qualified
stockholders for purposes of Section 883 to preclude
non-qualified 5% Stockholders in the closely-held group from
owning 50% or more of each class of the Companys stock for
more than half the number of days during the taxable year.
Treasury regulations are effective for calendar year taxpayers,
like the Company, beginning with the calendar year 2005. All the
Companys ship-operating subsidiaries currently satisfy the
50% Ownership Test. In addition, following the completion of the
Initial Public Offering of the Companys shares, the
management of the Company believes that by virtue of a special
rule applicable to situations where the ship operating companies
are beneficially owned by a publicly traded company like the
Company, the Publicly Traded Test can be satisfied based on the
trading volume and the widely-held ownership of the
Companys shares, but no assurance can be given that this
will remain so in the future, since continued compliance with
this rule is subject to factors outside the Companys
control.
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies:
|
Various claims, suits, and complaints, including those involving
government regulations and product liability, arise in the
ordinary course of shipping business. In addition, losses may
arise from disputes with charterers, agents, insurance and other
claims with suppliers relating to the operations of the
Companys vessels. Currently management is not aware of any
such claims or contingent liabilities which should be disclosed,
or for which a provision should be established in the
accompanying interim consolidated unaudited financial statements.
The Company accrues for the cost of environmental liabilities
when management becomes aware that a liability is probable and
is able to reasonably estimate the probable exposure. Currently,
management is not aware of any such claim or contingent
liabilities which should be disclosed, or for which a provision
should be established in the accompanying interim consolidated
unaudited financial statements. Up to $1 billion of the
liabilities associated with the individual vessels
actions, mainly for sea pollution, are covered by the Protection
and Indemnity (P&I) Club Insurance.
As further disclosed in Note 5 the Company has signed five
shipbuilding contracts for the construction of five VLOCs. As of
June 30, 2011, the amounts due until delivery of the
vessels are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
26,370
|
|
2012
|
|
|
184,650
|
|
2013
|
|
|
29,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
240,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-44
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
Future minimum contractual charter revenue deriving from
vessels long-term charter contracts represents revenue
until the earliest redelivery of each vessel and includes also
the revenue to be earned from vessels under construction. As of
June 30, 2011, future contractual revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
27,646
|
|
2012
|
|
|
51,077
|
|
2013
|
|
|
53,016
|
|
2014
|
|
|
42,044
|
|
2015
|
|
|
18,518
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
42,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
235,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue amounts do not include any assumed off-hires.
As further disclosed in Note 3 the Company has contracted
the commercial and technical management of its vessels to TMS
Dry Ltd. For these services it pays a monthly management fee.
Such management fees until the expiration of the agreements are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
2,383
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,598
|
|
2014
|
|
|
8,667
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Interest
and Finance Costs:
|
The amounts in the accompanying interim consolidated unaudited
statements of operations are analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3,536
|
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
Amortization and write-off of financing fees
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Other
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,086
|
|
|
$
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The realized result (loss) of the change in the fair value of
the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 9 for the six
month period ended June 30, 2010, of $4,284, previously
included in Interest and finance costs was
reclassified to Loss on interest rate swaps to
conform with the June 30, 2011 presentation. In addition as
a result of the above reclassification the amounts of interest
paid in the interim consolidated unaudited statements of cash
flows for six month period ended June 30, 2010, was changed
from $8,245 to $3,789.
The table below includes information about the Companys
reportable segments as of and for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2011. The accounting policies followed in
the preparation of the reportable
E-45
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
segments are the same as those followed in the preparation of
the Companys interim consolidated unaudited financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Tankers
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
36,648
|
|
|
$
|
16,171
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,819
|
|
Gain/(loss) on vessels sold and vessels held for sale
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
Interest and finance costs, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
|
(1,468
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(3,086
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(4,830
|
)
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,671
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(12,576
|
)
|
|
|
(877
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(13,581
|
)
|
Segment profit/(loss)
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
|
|
(7,079
|
)
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
503,845
|
|
|
$
|
43,878
|
|
|
$
|
20,819
|
|
|
$
|
568,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drybulk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
Carriers
|
|
|
Tankers
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
28,438
|
|
|
$
|
2,525
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,963
|
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of vessels held for sale
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(2,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
Interest and finance costs, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
(1,090
|
)
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1,888
|
)
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(8,253
|
)
|
Segment profit/(loss)
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
(3,352
|
)
|
|
|
(3,599
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
397,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
24,484
|
|
|
$
|
423,617
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As discussed in Note 8(f), the Companys stock price
had declined below $1.00 per share for a period of 30
consecutive business days, and on January 25, 2011, it
received notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market that it is not in
compliance with the minimum bid price rule. Following the
reverse stock split took effect on July 6, 2011, and
accordingly, the Companys then issued and outstanding
common stock remained above $1.00 for a period of 10 consecutive
business days and, as a result, on July 20, 2011, the
Company received notice from the Nasdaq Stock market that it had
regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement and
the noncompliance matter was closed. |
|
(b) |
|
On July 25, 2011, the Company and Steel Wheel
(Note 3(i)) signed an addendum to the initial consultancy
agreement providing for the termination of the agreement upon
completion of the Companys merger with Dryships discussed
below. Following the termination of the agreement Steel Wheel
will be entitled to receive $3,890 (Euro 2.7 million) as
provided in the related change of control clause. The
Companys Chief Executive Officer will continue to provide
his services on behalf of Steel Wheel under its current
remuneration fee until the closing of the merger or
December 31, 2011 whichever is latest. |
|
(c) |
|
On July 25, 2011, the Company, TMS Dry Ltd and TMS Bulkers
Ltd. entered into an agreement providing for the termination of
the management agreements with TMS Dry (Note 3(a)) upon
completion of the merger discussed below and TMS Dry Ltd will
receive (a) $6.6 million due to the change of control
and waive its contractual entitlement to seek fees for three
year and (b) $2.4 million commission due to the merger
transaction. Following the completion of the merger the Company
will enter into ship management agreements for each of the
eleven owned vessels and hulls with TMS Bulkers Ltd. on terms
identical to those in the management agreements with TMS Dry Ltd. |
E-46
OCEANFREIGHT
INC.
Notes to
Interim Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(d) |
|
On July 25, 2011, the Company and Vivid (Note 3(c)),
signed an addendum to the initial agreement whereas upon
completion of the merger discussed below the agreement will
terminate and the Company will not be liable to any
indemnification to Vivid. |
|
(e) |
|
On July 26, 2011, the Company and DryShips Inc.
(Dryships) announced that they have entered into a
definitive agreement for DryShips to acquire the outstanding
shares of the Company for a consideration per share of $11.25 in
cash and 0.52326 shares of common stock of Ocean Rig UDW
Inc., or Ocean Rig, a global provider of offshore ultra
deepwater drilling services that is 78% owned by DryShips. The
Ocean Rig shares that will be received by the Companys
shareholders will be from currently outstanding shares held by
DryShips. Under the terms of the transaction, the Ocean Rig
shares will be listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market upon
the closing of the merger, expected in the fourth quarter of
2011. The transaction has been approved by the Boards of
Directors of DryShips and OceanFreight, by the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors of DryShips, which negotiated the
proposed transaction on behalf of DryShips, and by a Special
Committee of independent directors of OceanFreight established
to negotiate the proposed transaction on behalf of OceanFreight.
In connection with the merger the Company is expected to pay
consulting and legal fees of approximately $2.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simultaneously with the execution of the definitive merger
agreement, DryShips, entities controlled by the Companys
CEO and OceanFreight, entered into a separate purchase
agreement. Under this agreement, DryShips will acquire from the
entities controlled by the Companys CEO all their
OceanFreight shares, representing a majority of the outstanding
shares of the Company, for the same consideration per share that
the OceanFreight stockholders will receive in the merger. This
acquisition is scheduled to close four weeks from the execution
of the merger agreement, subject to satisfaction of certain
conditions. DryShips intends to vote the OceanFreight shares so
acquired in favor of the merger, which requires approval by a
majority vote. The Ocean Rig shares to be paid by DryShips to
the entities controlled by the Companys CFO will be
sybject to a
6-month
lock-up. |
|
(f) |
|
On August 22, 2011, the Stockholders Right Agreement that
the Company entered into on April 30, 2008, as amended and
restated on May 26, 2010 and April 8, 2011, was
further amended and restated in connection with the above merger
transaction such that the acquisition by DryShips of shares of
the Companys Common Stock or interest therein pursuant to
the terms and subject to the conditions of both the Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated July 26, 2011, by and among Basset,
Steel Wheel Investments Limited, Haywood, the Company and
DryShips and the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
July 26, 2011, by and among DryShips, Pelican Stockholdings
Inc. and the Company, which agreements were unanimously approved
by our Board of Directors in July 2011, shall not cause
DryShips, or any beneficial owner or Affiliate or Associate
thereof, to be considered an Acquiring Person. |
E-47