e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
December 31,
2010
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156479
|
(State or Other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, Massachusetts
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
01803
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of January 31, 2011, was 300,573,739.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
1
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
133,856
|
|
|
$
|
113,227
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
122,820
|
|
|
|
103,695
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
47,153
|
|
|
|
46,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
303,829
|
|
|
|
262,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
17,146
|
|
|
|
12,591
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
78,212
|
|
|
|
61,996
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
8,273
|
|
|
|
7,990
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
13,291
|
|
|
|
11,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
116,922
|
|
|
|
93,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
186,907
|
|
|
|
169,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
41,381
|
|
|
|
36,950
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
78,344
|
|
|
|
65,562
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
31,182
|
|
|
|
27,451
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
22,677
|
|
|
|
22,126
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
3,001
|
|
|
|
12,805
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
178,636
|
|
|
|
165,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
8,271
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,227
|
)
|
|
|
(10,237
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
(3,938
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,021
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
298,633
|
|
|
|
279,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
298,633
|
|
|
|
279,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
554,389
|
|
|
$
|
516,630
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 9)
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
|
|
24,503
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
5,032
|
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$5,928 and $6,301
|
|
|
235,718
|
|
|
|
217,587
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
74,348
|
|
|
|
70,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
879,536
|
|
|
|
841,642
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
64,452
|
|
|
|
62,083
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
32,091
|
|
|
|
28,322
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,088,031
|
|
|
|
2,077,943
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
655,354
|
|
|
|
685,865
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
69,856
|
|
|
|
73,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,789,320
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$
|
7,443
|
|
|
$
|
7,764
|
|
Contingent and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
12,603
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
76,944
|
|
|
|
78,616
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
134,297
|
|
|
|
151,621
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
164,075
|
|
|
|
142,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
395,362
|
|
|
|
382,472
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
851,445
|
|
|
|
851,014
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
76,889
|
|
|
|
76,598
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
64,131
|
|
|
|
63,731
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
85,578
|
|
|
|
98,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,473,405
|
|
|
|
1,472,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
15,000 shares authorized; 3,562 shares issued and
outstanding (liquidation preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 560,000 shares
authorized; 303,936 and 301,623 shares issued and 300,185
and 297,950 shares outstanding
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,601,829
|
|
|
|
2,581,901
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,751 and 3,673 shares)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,303
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(281,364
|
)
|
|
|
(281,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,315,915
|
|
|
|
2,297,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,789,320
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
42,517
|
|
|
|
38,230
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
32,098
|
|
|
|
20,066
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
691
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(13,273
|
)
|
|
|
(6,267
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(4,996
|
)
|
|
|
475
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
|
(3,709
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(17,190
|
)
|
|
|
7,403
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
22,443
|
|
|
|
9,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
63,336
|
|
|
|
65,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(8,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,756
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(13,310
|
)
|
|
|
(141,721
|
)
|
Payments for equity investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,970
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(10,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash balances
|
|
|
17,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(9,145
|
)
|
|
|
(159,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(2,069
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
Payments on settlement of share-based derivatives
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(2,589
|
)
|
|
|
(2,256
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits on employee equity awards
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock plans
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
Cash used to net share settle employee equity awards
|
|
|
(18,403
|
)
|
|
|
(7,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(16,021
|
)
|
|
|
(6,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
37,759
|
|
|
|
(100,136
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
516,630
|
|
|
|
527,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
554,389
|
|
|
$
|
426,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Nuance Communications, Inc. (Nuance, we,
or the Company) and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We prepared these unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) for interim periods. In our
opinion, these financial statements reflect all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position for the periods
disclosed. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Although we believe the disclosures in these financial
statements are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, certain information normally included in the
footnotes prepared in accordance with GAAP has been omitted.
Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for a full year.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
We have made no material changes to the significant accounting
policies disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
Adoption
of new accounting standards
Effective October 1, 2010, we adopted the provisions in the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2009-14.
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements that
Include Software Elements and ASU
2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. As summarized in ASU
2009-14, ASC
Topic 985 has been amended to remove from the scope of industry
specific revenue accounting guidance for software and software
related transactions, tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to
deliver the products essential functionality. The
provisions of ASU
2009-13
apply to arrangements that are outside the scope of software
revenue recognition guidance and amend ASC Topic 605 to
(1) provide updated guidance on whether multiple
deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement
should be separated, and the consideration allocated;
(2) require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement
using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does
not have vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party
evidence of selling price; and (3) eliminate the use of the
residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using
the relative selling price method. The adoption of these
provisions did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
to add additional disclosures about the different classes of
assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation
techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements, and transfers between Levels 1, 2, and
3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value measurements are defined
in Note 8 below. ASU
2010-06 was
effective for us for the interim reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions related to
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. ASU
2010-06
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-28,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. ASU
2010-28 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or
negative carrying amounts and
5
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors indicate that
it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. We
do not believe that this will have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
The components of comprehensive loss are as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation losses, net
|
|
|
(1,671
|
)
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives, net
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
811
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of pension loss amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive loss adjustments
|
|
|
(1,202
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma
Results
On December 30, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SpinVox Limited (Spinvox), a
UK-based privately-held company engaged in the business of
providing
voicemail-to-text
services. The following table shows unaudited pro forma results
of operations as if we had acquired SpinVox on October 1,
2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
303,829
|
|
|
$
|
274,953
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,840
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
We have not furnished pro forma financial information related to
our other fiscal 2011 and 2010 acquisitions because such
information is not material, individually or in the aggregate,
to our financial results. The unaudited pro forma results of
operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results
that would have occurred had the transactions actually taken
place at the beginning of the periods indicated.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, net
The components of acquisition-related costs, net are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
957
|
|
|
$
|
3,453
|
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
|
$
|
12,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The decrease in acquisition-related costs, net for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by a
reduction in transition and integration costs and professional
service fees. For the three months ended December 31, 2009,
transition and integration costs consisted primarily of the
costs associated with transitional employees from our fiscal
2009 acquisitions; professional services consisted of expenses
related to our acquisition of SpinVox in December 2009 and
approximately $2.2 million that had been capitalized as of
September 30, 2009 related to transaction costs incurred in
prior periods that was required to be expensed upon our adoption
of ASC 805, Business Combinations, in fiscal 2010.
|
|
5.
|
Contingent
Acquisition Payments
|
Earn-out
Payments
For business combinations occurring subsequent to the adoption
of ASC 805 in fiscal 2010, the fair value of any contingent
consideration is established at the acquisition date and
included in the total purchase price. The contingent
consideration is then adjusted to fair value as an increase or
decrease in current earnings in each reporting period.
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions prior to our
adoption of ASC 805 have been and will continue to be
recorded as additional purchase price when the contingency is
resolved and additional consideration is attributable.
The changes in the fair value of contingent consideration during
the period are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
13,180
|
|
Charges to acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
10,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earn-out payments are generally payable based on achieving
certain financial targets during defined post-acquisition time
periods as specified in the purchase and sale agreement for each
acquisition. Changes in the fair value during the three months
ended December 31, 2010 resulted from improved revenue
performance together with an increase in our stock price during
the earn-out period. The prior year goodwill activity relates to
the earn-out consideration for our acquisition of SNAPin prior
to our adoption of ASC 805.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada) in November 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured over
defined periods through December 31, 2010, in accordance
with the merger agreement. We have notified the former
shareholders of Vocada that the financial targets were not
achieved. In December 2010, the former shareholders filed a
demand for arbitration in accordance with their rights under the
merger agreement. At December 31, 2010, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these earn-out provisions.
In connection with the acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure) in September 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $8.0 million payable
in stock or cash, solely at our discretion, upon the achievement
of certain financial targets for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and
2010. Earn-out payments, if any, will be recorded as incremental
purchase price and allocated to goodwill. We have provided the
following notices to the former shareholders of Comissure:
|
|
|
|
|
The financial targets for the fiscal year 2008 earnout were not
achieved and the related contingent earnout payment was not
earned;
|
7
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The financial targets for the fiscal year 2009 earnout were not
achieved and the related contingent earnout payment was not
earned; and
|
|
|
|
The financial targets for the fiscal year 2010 earnout were
partially achieved and, accordingly, a contingent earnout
payment of $1.0 million was earned.
|
We intend to pay the fiscal year 2010 earnout in cash on or
before February 7, 2011 and the earnout payment will be
recorded as incremental purchase price and allocated to goodwill.
Escrow
and Holdback Arrangements
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have placed
either cash or shares of our common stock in escrow to satisfy
any claims we may have. If no claims are made, the escrowed
amounts will be released to the former shareholders of the
acquired companies. Historically, under the previous accounting
guidance of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141), we could not make a
determination, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the escrow
would become payable to the former shareholders of these
companies until the escrow period had expired. Accordingly,
these amounts were treated as contingent purchase price until it
was determined that the escrow was payable, at which time the
escrowed amounts would be recorded as additional purchase price
and allocated to goodwill. Under the revised accounting guidance
of ASC 805, escrow payments are generally considered part
of the initial purchase consideration and accounted for as
goodwill.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the last
remaining escrowed amounts accounted for under previous
accounting guidance expired. Payments totaling $5.2 million
were released to former shareholders of
X-Solutions
Group B.V. and eCopy and were recorded as an increase to
goodwill during the period.
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and intangible
assets for the three months ended December 31, 2010, are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,077,943
|
|
|
$
|
685,865
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
7,860
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,968
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,088,031
|
|
|
$
|
655,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, we made an
immaterial acquisition of a business that provides voice
biometric products for total cash consideration of
$12.6 million. Purchase accounting adjustments to goodwill
recorded during the three months ended December 31, 2010,
consisted primarily of a $5.2 million release of escrow
cash related to our fiscal 2009 acquisitions. This increase in
goodwill was partially offset by a $1.1 million reduction
resulting from the finalization of the Spinvox purchase
accounting and a $0.9 million reduction due to an increase
in the fair value estimate of acquired intangible assets from a
fourth quarter fiscal 2010 acquisition.
|
|
7.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Cash
Flow Hedges
Forward
Currency Contracts
We enter into foreign currency contracts to hedge the
variability of cash flows in Canadian Dollars (CAD) and
Hungarian Forints (HUF) which are designated as cash flow
hedges. These contracts settle monthly through
8
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
October 2011. At December 31, 2010 and September 30,
2010, the notional value and the aggregate cumulative unrealized
gains on the outstanding contracts were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Cumulative
|
|
|
|
Notional Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Canadian Dollars
|
|
$
|
9,613
|
|
|
$
|
13,032
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
Hungarian Forints
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contracts designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
$
|
12,569
|
|
|
$
|
17,596
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
Forward
Currency Contracts
We operate our business in countries throughout the world and
transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign
currency exposures typically arise from transactions denominated
in currencies other than the local functional currency of our
operations. During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, we
established a program that primarily utilizes foreign currency
forward contracts to offset these risks associated with the
effect of certain foreign currency exposures. We commenced this
program so that increases or decreases in our foreign currency
exposures are offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency
forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks and volatility
associated with our foreign currency transactions. Generally, we
enter into contracts for less than 30 days, and at
December 31, 2010 we had outstanding contracts with a total
notional value of $127.6 million.
We have not designated these forward contracts as hedging
instruments pursuant to ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging
and accordingly, we recorded the fair value of these
contracts at the end of each reporting period in our
consolidated balance sheet, with changes in the fair value
recorded in earnings as other income (expense), net in our
consolidated statement of operations. During the three months
ended December 31, 2010, we recorded $1.9 million of
losses associated with these contracts.
During fiscal 2010, we entered into a Euro 18 million
foreign currency contract to offset the foreign currency
exposure on a fixed obligation assumed in connection with our
acquisition of SpinVox in December 2009.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we entered
into foreign currency forward contracts to offset foreign
currency exposure on the deferred acquisition payment of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS. The
foreign currency contracts matured and were settled on
October 22, 2009. The gain for the period from
September 30, 2009 to settlement on October 22, 2009
was $1.6 million, which was offset in other income
(expense), net by the loss resulting from the corresponding
change in the associated deferred acquisition payment liability.
Security
Price Guarantees
From time to time we enter into agreements that allow us to
issue shares of our common stock as part or all of the
consideration related to partnering and technology acquisition
activities. Generally these shares are issued subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives. We have determined that these instruments would not
be considered equity instruments if they were freestanding. The
security price guarantees require payment from either us to a
third party, or from a third party to us, based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. Changes in the fair value of
these security price guarantees are reported in earnings in each
period as other income (expense), net. During the three months
ended December 31, 2010, we recorded $7.2 million of
gains associated with these contracts and made cash payments
totaling $1.0 million upon the settlement of agreements
during the quarter.
9
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of the outstanding shares subject to
security price guarantees at December 31, 2010 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value of Shares
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Settlement Date(a)
|
|
on Issue Date
|
|
|
June 24, 2010
|
|
|
152,440
|
|
|
December 24, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
|
1,178,732
|
|
|
March 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,572,607
|
|
|
March 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
24,800
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The final cash payment is based on the weighted average stock
price for the 10 days following the settlement date and we
are subject to equity price risk during that time. |
The following table provides a quantitative summary of the fair
value of our hedged and non-hedged derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
7,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of non-hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,690
|
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value of hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the activity of derivative
instruments for the three months ended December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively (dollars in thousands):
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(158
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
10
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(2,671
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,614
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
7,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,072
|
|
Other
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments, including cash equivalents, restricted
cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and derivative
instruments, are carried in the consolidated financial
statements at amounts that approximate their fair value.
The fair value of our long-term debt was estimated to be
$928.7 million and $902.2 million at December 31,
2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. These fair value
amounts represent the value at which our lenders could trade our
debt within the financial markets, and do not represent the
settlement value of these long-term debt liabilities to us at
each reporting date. The fair value of the long-term debt issues
will continue to vary each period based on fluctuations in
market interest rates, as well as changes to our credit ratings.
These fluctuations may have little to no correlation to our
reported debt balances. The term loan portion of our Credit
Facility is traded and the fair values are based upon traded
prices as of the reporting dates. The fair values of the
2.75% Convertible Debentures at each respective reporting
date were estimated using the averages of the December 31,
2010 and September 30, 2010 bid and ask trading quotes. We
had no outstanding balance on the revolving credit line portion
of our Credit Facility. Our capital lease obligations and other
debt are not traded and the fair values of these instruments are
assumed to approximate their carrying values as of
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an
asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Valuation techniques must maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When determining
the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required
to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most
advantageous market in which we would transact and consider
assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the
asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer
restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measures and Disclosures, establishes
a value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the third is considered
unobservable:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than
those described as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.
|
11
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010
consisted of (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
480,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
480,021
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities, $37,172 at cost(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,123
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
481,021
|
|
|
$
|
45,009
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
526,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Contingent earn-out(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities, $33,337 at cost(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
471,845
|
|
|
$
|
34,862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
506,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
Interest rate swaps(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Contingent earn-out(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Money market funds and US government agency securities, included
in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet,
are valued at quoted market prices in active markets. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of our marketable securities and foreign currency
exchange contracts is based on the most recent observable inputs
for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active
or are directly or indirectly observable. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair values of the security price guarantees are determined
using a modified Black-Scholes model, derived from observable
inputs such as US treasury interest rates, our common stock
price, and the volatility of our common stock. The valuation
model values both the put and call components of the guarantees
simultaneously, with the net value of those components
representing the fair value of each instrument. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair value of our contingent consideration arrangement is
determined based on the Companys evaluation as to the
probability and amount of any earn-out that will be achieved
based on expected future performance by the acquired entity, as
well as our common stock price since the contingent
consideration arrangement is |
12
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
payable in shares of our common stock. Refer to Note 5 for
additional information including the summary of changes in fair
value during the period. |
|
(e) |
|
The fair values of the interest rate swaps are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses that factor in observable market
inputs such as LIBOR based yield curves, forward
rates, and credit spreads. |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
62,167
|
|
|
$
|
56,047
|
|
Sales and marketing incentives(a)
|
|
|
15,794
|
|
|
|
40,780
|
|
Cost of revenue related liabilities
|
|
|
10,694
|
|
|
|
10,028
|
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
|
|
10,197
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
9,354
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
Sales and other taxes payable
|
|
|
7,355
|
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
Acquisition costs and liabilities
|
|
|
4,886
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
Security price guarantee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11,581
|
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
134,297
|
|
|
$
|
151,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The decrease in accrued sales and marketing incentives was
driven by an EUR 18.0 million ($23.4 million
equivalent) payment in December 2010 for a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox. The
related EUR 18.0 million of restricted cash was placed in
an irrevocable standby letter of credit account at the end of
fiscal year 2010 and was released upon satisfaction of the
liability in December 2010. At December 31, 2010, we have
an additional EUR 5.0 million ($6.6 million
equivalent) of restricted cash that has been placed in an
irrevocable standby letter of credit for a related liability. |
Deferred revenue consisted of the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
93,737
|
|
|
$
|
90,969
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
70,338
|
|
|
|
51,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
164,075
|
|
|
$
|
142,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
13,537
|
|
|
$
|
12,902
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
63,352
|
|
|
|
63,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
76,889
|
|
|
$
|
76,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue consists of prepaid fees received
for post-contract customer support for our products, including
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
13
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
when-and-if-available
basis. Unearned revenue includes upfront fees for setup and
implementation activities related to hosted offerings; certain
software arrangements for which we do not have fair value of
post-contract customer support, resulting in ratable revenue
recognition for the entire arrangement on a straight-line basis;
and fees in excess of estimated earnings on
percentage-of-completion
service contracts.
|
|
11.
|
Business
Combination Costs
|
The activity for the three months ended December 31, 2010,
relating to all facilities and personnel recorded in accrued
business combination costs, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
23,871
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(2,881
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2,885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
21,356
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
21,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
10,049
|
|
|
$
|
10,197
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
11,462
|
|
|
|
13,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,511
|
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
The following table sets forth the three months ended
December 31, 2010 accrual activity relating to
restructuring and other charges (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
2,121
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,721
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(2,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded
net restructuring and other charges of $1.9 million, which
consisted primarily of $1.3 million related to facilities
that we no longer occupy.
|
|
13.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
We have $250 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures
due in August 2027. As of December 31, 2010, no conversion
triggers were met. If the conversion triggers were met, we could
be required to repay all or some of the principal amount in cash
prior to maturity.
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility which consists of a $75 million
revolving credit line, reduced by outstanding letters of credit,
a $355 million term loan entered into on March 31,
2006, a $90 million term loan entered into on April 5,
14
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2007 and a $225 million term loan entered into on
August 24, 2007 (collectively the Credit
Facility). The term loans are due March 2013 and the
revolving credit line is due March 2012. As of December 31,
2010, $641.9 million remained outstanding under the term
loans, there were $15.8 million of letters of credit issued
under the revolving credit line and there were no other
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit line. As of
December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with the covenants
under the Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2010, based on our leverage ratio, the
applicable margin for our term loan was 0.75% for base rate
borrowings and 1.75% for LIBOR-based borrowings. This results in
an effective interest rate of 2.01%. No payments under the
excess cash flow sweep provision were due in the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 as no excess cash flow, as defined, was generated
in fiscal 2010. At the current time, we are unable to predict
the amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future fiscal years pursuant to the excess
cash flow sweep provisions.
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of
diluted net loss per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares aggregating to
17.1 million and 24.4 million shares for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted
net loss per share because their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
We have, from time to time, entered into stock and warrant
agreements with Warburg Pincus. In connection with these
agreements, we granted Warburg Pincus the right to request that
we use commercially reasonable efforts to register some or all
of the shares of common stock issued to them pursuant to the
purchase agreements, including shares of common stock underlying
the warrants. At December 31, 2010, Warburg Pincus holds
the following warrants to purchase shares of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
3,862,422
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2013
|
|
May 20, 2008
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2012
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period. Our share-based awards are accounted for as
equity instruments. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to stock-based compensation
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting
|
|
|
5,688
|
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
4,867
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
8,519
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,098
|
|
|
$
|
20,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in stock-based compensation for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 is $6.2 million of expense related
to awards that will be made as part of the fiscal 2011 annual
bonus plan to employees. The annual bonus pool is
15
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determined by management and approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors based on financial
performance targets approved at the beginning of the year. If
these targets are achieved, the awards will be settled in shares
based on the total bonus earned and the grant date fair value of
the shares awarded to each employee.
Stock
Options
The table below summarizes activity relating to stock options
for the three months ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,703,237
|
|
|
$
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(678,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(27,319
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(22,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
10,974,822
|
|
|
$
|
9.27
|
|
|
|
3.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
97.9 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
8,591,537
|
|
|
$
|
7.77
|
|
|
|
2.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
89.6 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
9,774,756
|
|
|
$
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
3.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
89.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based
on the positive difference, if any, between the closing market
value of our common stock on December 31, 2010 ($18.18) and
the exercise price of the underlying options. |
As of December 31, 2010, the total unamortized fair value
of stock options was $10.7 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 1.3 years. A summary of
weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
and intrinsic value of stock options exercised is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.90
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. The fair value of the stock
options granted and unvested options assumed from acquisitions
during the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
|
|
51.0
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
16
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Units
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested and released. The table
below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units for the
three months ending December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
|
Contingent Awards
|
|
|
Time-Based Awards
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,867,840
|
|
|
|
7,795,114
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
894,450
|
|
|
|
2,388,248
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(1,188,803
|
)
|
|
|
(1,253,573
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(177,667
|
)
|
|
|
(134,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,395,820
|
|
|
|
8,794,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding
Restricted Units
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding Restricted Units(1)
|
|
$
|
43.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
159.9 million
|
|
Restricted Units vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
2,170,320
|
|
|
|
8,118,902
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of Restricted Units
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of Restricted Units vested and
expected to vest(1)
|
|
$
|
39.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
147.6 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
our common stock on December 31, 2010 ($18.18) and the
exercise price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is $0.001 per
share. As of December 31, 2010, unearned stock-based
compensation expense related to all unvested Restricted Units is
$151.8 million, which will, based on expectations of future
performance vesting criteria, where applicable, be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value, including
those assumed in respective periods, and intrinsic value of all
Restricted Units vested is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
17.00
|
|
|
$
|
14.58
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
25.3
|
|
The effective income tax rate was 100.1% and (8.6)% for the
three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Included in the tax provision for the three months
ended December 31, 2010 was a U.S tax provision of
$4.8 million and a foreign income tax provision of
$1.2 million. Included in the tax provision for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 was foreign income tax
provision, as well as a $1.5 million tax benefit resulting
from the favorable settlement of a state tax penalty related to
the eScription acquisition. No tax benefit was recognized on the
U.S. losses for the three months ended December 31,
2009 as the realization of such benefit was not more likely than
not.
17
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the
liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax
positions was $13.0 million and $12.8 million,
respectively. We do not expect a significant change in the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next
12 months.
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, we have, from time
to time, been notified of claims that we may be infringing, or
contributing to the infringement of, the intellectual property
rights of others. These claims have been referred to counsel,
and they are in various stages of evaluation and negotiation. If
it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses for
these intellectual property rights. There is no assurance that
licenses will be offered by all claimants, that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
Vianix LLC has filed three legal actions against us, consisting
of two breach of contract actions and a copyright infringement
claim. We believe that our maximum potential exposure related to
these claims is immaterial and we have not accrued any
settlement liability for these actions.
We do not believe that the final outcome of the above litigation
matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations. However, even if our defense
is successful, the litigation could require significant
management time and will be costly. Should we not prevail, our
operating results, financial position and cash flows could be
adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
We include indemnification provisions in the contracts we enter
into with customers and business partners. Generally, these
provisions require us to defend claims arising out of our
products infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights, breach of contractual obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct. The indemnity
obligations generally cover damages, costs and attorneys
fees arising out of such claims. In most, but not all, cases,
our total liability under such provisions is limited to either
the value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases our total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all cases, the term of the indemnity
provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential amount of
future payments we could be required to make under all the
indemnification provisions is unlimited, we believe the
estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal due to the
low frequency with which these provisions have been triggered.
We indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by law. These agreements, among other things,
indemnify directors and officers for expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlement amounts incurred by such persons in
their capacity as a director or officer of the company,
regardless of whether the individual is serving in any such
capacity at the time the liability or expense is incurred.
Additionally, in connection with certain acquisitions we have
agreed to indemnify the former officers and members of the
boards of directors of those companies, on similar terms as
described above, for a period of six years from the acquisition
date. In certain cases we purchase director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations, which fully
cover the six year periods. To the extent that we do not
purchase a director and officer insurance policy for the full
period of any contractual indemnification, we would be required
to pay for costs incurred, if any, as described above.
|
|
19.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
We follow the provisions of ASC 280, Segment
Reporting, which establishes standards for reporting
information about operating segments. ASC 280 also
established standards for disclosures about products, services
and geographic areas. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise for which separate financial
information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
18
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker (CODM) is the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company.
We have several customer-facing market groups that oversee the
core markets where we conduct business. These groups are
referred to as Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise and
Imaging. These groups do not directly manage centralized or
shared resources or make allocation decisions regarding the
activities related to these functions, which include sales and
sales operations, certain research and development initiatives,
business development and all general and administrative
activities. Our CODM oversees these groups as well as each of
the functions that provide the shared and centralized activities
noted above. To manage the business, allocate resources and
assess performance, the CODM regularly reviews revenue data by
market group, while reviewing gross margins, operating margins,
and other measures of income or loss on a consolidated basis.
Thus, we have determined that we operate in one segment.
The following table presents revenue information for our four
core markets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
117,437
|
|
|
$
|
105,526
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
86,115
|
|
|
|
64,093
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
71,048
|
|
|
|
75,365
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
29,229
|
|
|
|
17,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
303,829
|
|
|
$
|
262,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States provided greater than
10% of our total revenue. Revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, was as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
231,690
|
|
|
$
|
186,499
|
|
International
|
|
|
72,139
|
|
|
|
76,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
303,829
|
|
|
$
|
262,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States held greater than 10% of
our long-lived or total assets. Our long-lived assets, including
intangible assets and goodwill, were located as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,468,575
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,952
|
|
International
|
|
|
441,209
|
|
|
|
448,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,909,784
|
|
|
$
|
2,928,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenues, cost of revenues, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to our core markets;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
OVERVIEW
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used every
day by millions of people and thousands of businesses for tasks
and services such as requesting information from a phone-based
self-service solution, dictating medical records, searching the
mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a navigation
system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions help make
these interactions, tasks and experiences more productive,
compelling and efficient.
Our technologies address our four core markets:
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare. We provide comprehensive dictation
and transcription solutions and services that automate the input
and management of medical information. Our hosted and on-premise
solutions provide platforms to generate and distribute clinical
documentation through the use of advanced dictation and
transcription features, and allow us to deliver scalable, highly
productive medical transcription solutions. Our solutions also
enable us to accelerate future innovation to transform the way
healthcare providers document patient care, through improved
interface with electronic medical records and extraction of
clinical information to support the billing and insurance
reimbursement processes. We also offer speech recognition
solutions for radiology, cardiology, pathology and related
specialties, that help healthcare providers dictate, edit and
sign reports without manual transcription.
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer. Our portfolio of mobile
and consumer solutions and services includes an integrated suite
of voice control and
text-to-speech
solutions, dictation applications, predictive text technologies,
mobile messaging services and emerging services such as
dictation, Web search and
voicemail-to-text.
Our suite of Dragon general purpose desktop and portable
computer dictation applications increases productivity by using
speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex
tasks, input data, complete forms and automate manual
transcription processes. In particular, we have focused in
recent quarters on integrating our Dragon technology and brand
initiatives across mobile and consumer markets.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise. We deliver a portfolio of customer
service business intelligence and authentication solutions that
are designed to help companies better support, understand and
communicate with their customers. Our hosted and on-premise
solutions include the use of technologies such as speech
recognition, natural language understanding,
text-to-speech,
biometric voice recognition and analytics to automate caller
identification and authorization, call steering, completion of
tasks such as updates, purchases and information retrieval, and
automated outbound notifications. In addition, we offer
solutions that can meet customer care needs through direct
interaction with thin-client applications on cell phones,
enabling customers to very quickly retrieve relevant
information. Our solutions improve the customer experience,
increase the use of self-service and enable new revenue
opportunities.
|
|
|
|
Imaging. Our imaging solutions offer
comprehensive PDF applications designed specifically for
business users, optical character recognition technology to
deliver highly accurate document and PDF conversion, and
applications that combine PDF creation with network scanning to
quickly enable distribution of documents to users desktops
or to enterprise applications, as well as software development
toolkits for independent software vendors.
|
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website, and also through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors.
Confronted by dramatic increases in electronic information,
consumers, business personnel and healthcare professionals must
use a variety of resources to retrieve information, transcribe
patient records, conduct transactions and perform other
job-related functions. We believe that the power of our
solutions can transform the way people use the Internet,
telecommunications systems, electronic medical records, wireless
and mobile networks and related corporate infrastructure to
conduct business.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to broaden these assets and expand our customer
base through acquisitions. In evaluating the financial condition
and operating performance of our business, management focuses on
revenue, earnings, gross margins, operating margins and cash
flow from operations. A summary of these key financial metrics
for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as compared
to the three months ended December 31, 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased by $40.8 million to
$303.8 million;
|
|
|
|
Net loss decreased by $4.3 million;
|
|
|
|
Gross margins decreased by 2.9 percentage points to 61.5%;
|
|
|
|
Operating margins increased by 1.2 percentage points to
2.7%; and
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities decreased by
$1.7 million to $63.3 million.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(GAAP) require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to: revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; the costs to complete the development of
custom software applications; the valuation of goodwill,
intangible assets and tangible long-lived assets;
21
accounting for business combinations; share-based payments;
valuation of derivative instruments; accounting for income taxes
and related valuation allowances and loss contingencies. Our
management bases its estimates on historical experience, market
participant fair value considerations and various other factors
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Information about those accounting policies we deem to be
critical to our financial reporting may be found in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. There have
been no significant changes or additions to our critical
accounting policies from those disclosed in our annual report
other than those changes in our policies for the adoption of new
revenue accounting standards, as described in Note 2 to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements included in
Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Total
Revenues
The following tables show total revenue from our four core
market groups and revenue by geographic location, based on the
location of our customers, in dollars and percentage change
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
105.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
86.1
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
75.4
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
303.8
|
|
|
$
|
263.0
|
|
|
$
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
231.7
|
|
|
$
|
186.5
|
|
|
$
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
303.8
|
|
|
$
|
263.0
|
|
|
$
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total revenue for the three months ended
December 31, 2010, as compared to the three months ended
December 31, 2009, was driven by a combination of organic
growth and contributions from fiscal 2010 acquisitions.
Healthcare revenue increased primarily as a result of
contributions from our fourth quarter fiscal 2010 acquisitions
as well as growth in sales of our Dragon Medical solutions.
Mobile and Consumer revenue increased primarily driven by our
holiday campaign related to the new versions of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking for Windows and Dragon Dictate for Mac and
growth in our hosted mobile services, primarily related to
SpinVox. Enterprise revenue had decreases in both product and
licensing revenue as well as professional services and hosting
revenue. Imaging revenue increased primarily as a result of
contributions from our eCopy products.
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our technology. The following table shows product
and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
133.8
|
|
|
$
|
113.2
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in product and licensing revenue for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, consisted of a
$10.3 million increase in Mobile and Consumer revenue
primarily driven by growth in sales of our Dragon
NaturallySpeaking 11 for Windows and Dragon Dictate for Mac.
Imaging product and licensing revenue increased by
$10.3 million, which included $2.8 million from the
effect of our adoption of the new revenue recognition rules as
disclosed in Note 2 of our consolidated financial
statements. The remaining increase was primarily driven by sales
of our eCopy products.
Professional
Services and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering hosted
transcription and dictation services over a
23
specified term, as well as self-service, hosting offerings to
carriers and enterprises. The following table shows professional
services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of
total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
122.8
|
|
|
$
|
103.7
|
|
|
$
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
the three months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to
the three months ended December 31, 2009, consisted of a
$12.1 million increase in Mobile and Consumer revenue
primarily as a result of growth in our hosted mobile services,
driven by SpinVox. Healthcare revenue increased
$10.0 million primarily as a result of growth of our
hosting solutions, including the impact from our fourth quarter
fiscal 2010 acquisitions. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011,
the annualized line run-rate in our healthcare hosting business
was approximately 3.425 billion lines per year, up 14% from
3.010 billion lines per year during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010. The annualized line run-rate is determined by the
number of lines actually billed in a given quarter, multiplied
by four. Our backlog hours in enterprise professional services
were 335,000 hours as of December 31, 2010, compared
to 250,000 hours as of December 31, 2009. Enterprise
professional services backlog hours reflect the accumulated
estimated hours necessary to fulfill all of our existing,
executed professional services contracts within the enterprise
business, including those that are cancelable by customers,
based on the original estimate of hours sold.
The estimated
3-year value
of total on-demand contracts was $1,174.4 million at
December 31, 2010, up 21.2% from $968.6 million at
December 31, 2009. We determine this value by using our
best estimate of all anticipated future revenue streams under
signed on-demand contracts currently in place, whether or not
they are guaranteed through a minimum commitment clause. Our
best estimate is based on assumptions about launch dates,
volumes and renewal rates within the three year period. Most of
these contracts are priced by volume of usage and typically have
no or low minimum commitments. Actual revenue could vary from
our estimates due to factors such as cancellations, non-renewals
or volume fluctuations.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance services. The following table shows
maintenance and support revenue, in dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
47.2
|
|
|
$
|
46.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, consisted primarily of a
$1.0 million increase in Healthcare maintenance and support
revenue, driven by organic growth.
24
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
three months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the
three months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily due to
a $3.1 million increase in Mobile and Consumer costs driven
by sales growth related to the new versions of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking for Windows and Dragon Dictate for Mac. In
addition, Imaging costs increased $1.9 million as a result
of our eCopy products.
Cost of
Professional Services and Hosting Revenue
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue primarily
consists of compensation for consulting personnel, outside
consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our hosted, hosting solutions.
The following table shows cost of professional services and
hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of professional
services and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
78.2
|
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
$
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as
compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009, was
primarily due to a $7.3 million increase in Mobile and
Consumer costs which included the effect of our acquisition of
SpinVox, a $4.5 million increase in Healthcare costs and a
$3.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The overall increase of $0.3 million in cost of maintenance
and support revenue for the three months ended December 31,
2010, as compared to the three months ended December 31,
2009, is consistent with the growth in revenue for each of the
core businesses.
25
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries,
benefits and overhead relating to engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total research and development expense
|
|
$
|
41.4
|
|
|
$
|
37.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expense for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily attributable
to an increase in headcount as we continue to invest in our
research and development organization.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshow costs and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
78.3
|
|
|
$
|
65.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the three months
ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three months
ended December 31, 2009, was primarily attributable to an
$8.1 million increase in marketing and channel program
spending to drive overall revenue growth, as well as a
$4.0 million increase in compensation and other variable
costs, such as commissions and travel expenses. The increase in
compensation and other variable costs was attributable to the
additional headcount from our acquisitions during the second
half of fiscal 2010.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors including accountants and
attorneys, insurance, and provisions for doubtful accounts. The
following table shows general and administrative expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
31.2
|
|
|
$
|
27.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expense for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily attributable
to a $4.4 million increase in compensation expense from an
increase in stock-based compensation and partially offset by a
$0.9 million decrease in professional services expense as a
result of cost containment efforts.
26
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology are included in cost of revenue and the amortization
of acquired customer and contractual relationships, non-compete
agreements, acquired tradenames and trademarks, and other
intangibles are included in operating expenses. Customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis based upon
the pattern in which the economic benefits of the customer
relationships are being realized. Other identifiable intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was recorded as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of Revenue
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amortization expense
|
|
$
|
36.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily attributable
to the amortization of acquired intangible assets from our
business acquisitions during fiscal 2010 and our acquisitions of
patents and technology from other third-parties during fiscal
2010. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in
amortization of customer relationships that are recognized over
the period of expected economic benefit.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, Net
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each reporting period, such as contingent
consideration, and other items related to acquisitions for which
the measurement period has ended. Acquisition-related costs were
recorded as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(70.6
|
)%
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
(86.0
|
)%
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
600.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
$
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
(76.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in acquisition-related costs, net for the three
months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by a
reduction in transition and integration costs and professional
service fees. For the three months ended December 31, 2009,
transition and integration costs consisted primarily of the
costs associated with transitional employees from our fiscal
2009 acquisitions; professional services consisted of expenses
related to our acquisition of SpinVox in December 2009 and
approximately $2.2 million that had been capitalized as of
September 30, 2009 related to transaction costs incurred in
prior periods that was required to be expensed upon our adoption
of ASC 805, Business Combinations, in fiscal 2010.
27
Restructuring
and Other Charges, Net
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded
net restructuring and other charges of $1.9 million, which
consisted primarily of $1.3 million related to facilities
we no longer occupy.
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded
net restructuring and other charges of $0.6 million, which
consisted of $1.2 million related to the elimination of
approximately 40 personnel across multiple functions,
partially offset by $0.6 million reduction in expense
resulting from change in sublease income assumptions.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
205.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
70.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in other income (expense), net for the three months
ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the three months
ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by a
$7.2 million gain on our outstanding security price
guarantees derivatives, which was partially offset by a
$0.9 million of foreign exchange losses, including the
impact of our foreign exchange forward contracts.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes and the
effective income tax rate (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
1,900.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
100.1
|
%
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective income tax rate was 100.1% and (8.6)% for the
three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate
primarily relates to the $4.8 million U.S. tax
provision recognized in the three months ended December 31,
2010. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, no
U.S. tax benefit was recorded on the U.S. losses, as
the realization of such benefit was not more likely than not.
28
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $554.4 million as of
December 31, 2010, an increase of $37.8 million as
compared to $516.6 million as of September 30, 2010.
Our working capital was $484.2 million as of
December 31, 2010, as compared to $459.2 million as of
September 30, 2010. In addition, we had $32.1 million
of non-current marketable securities as of December 31,
2010, an increase of $3.8 million as compared to
$28.3 million as of September 30, 2010. Cash and
marketable securities held by our international operations
totaled $54.6 million and $40.5 million at
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010,
respectively. We expect the cash held overseas will continue to
be used for our international operations and therefore do not
anticipate repatriating these funds. If we were to repatriate
these funds, we do not believe there would be a material impact
to our liquidity. As of December 31, 2010, our total
accumulated deficit was $281.4 million. We do not expect
our accumulated deficit to impact our future ability to operate
the business given our strong cash and operating cash flow
positions, and believe our current cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities on-hand are sufficient to meet our
operating needs for at least the next twelve months.
Cash
Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 was $63.3 million, a decrease of
$1.8 million, or 2.8%, as compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $65.1 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily driven
by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $25.0 million from change in working
capital primarily driven by an EUR 18.0 million
($23.4 million equivalent) payment for a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash resulting from an increase in net income,
exclusive of non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$20.2 million; and
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash of $13.0 million from deferred revenue
primarily attributable to upfront billings for set-up and
implementation activities related to our hosted offerings.
|
Cash Used
in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 was $9.1 million, a decrease of
$150.3 million, or 94.3%, as compared to cash used in
investing activities of $159.4 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2009. The net decrease was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $128.4 million in cash payments related to
business acquisitions, primarily driven by the cash paid in the
acquisition of SpinVox and the PSRS deferred acquisition payment
during the three months ended December 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
A cash inflow of $17.2 million in restricted cash in
December 2010 related to the release of cash placed in an
irrevocable standby letter of credit account for payment of a
fixed obligation in connection with our acquisition of
SpinVox; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $15.0 million in cash payments for equity
investments in a non-public company made during the three months
ended December 31, 2009.
|
Cash Used
in Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 was $16.0 million, an increase of
$9.6 million, or 149.1%, as compared to cash used in
financing activities of $6.4 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2009. The net increase was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An $10.8 million decrease in cash as a result of the
increase in cash payments to net share settle employee equity
awards, due to an increase in intrinsic value of the shares
vested as a result of the overall increase in our stock price
during the three months ended December 31, 2010 as compared
to the same period in 2009; and
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
A $3.7 million cash inflow resulting from excess tax
benefits on employee equity awards during the first quarter of
2011
|
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
We have $250 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures
due in August 2027. As of December 31, 2010, no conversion
triggers were met. If the conversion triggers were met, we could
be required to repay all or some of the principal amount in cash
prior to maturity.
Credit
Facility
As of December 31, 2010, $641.9 million remained
outstanding under our term loan. There were $15.8 million
of letters of credit issued under the revolving credit line and
there were no other outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit line. As of December 31, 2010, we are in compliance
with the covenants under the Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2010, based on our leverage ratio, the
applicable margin for our term loan was 1.00% for base rate
borrowings and 1.75% for LIBOR-based borrowings. This results in
an effective interest rate of 2.01%. No payments under the
excess cash flow sweep provision were due in the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 as no excess cash flow, as defined, was generated
in fiscal 2010. At the current time, we are unable to predict
the amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future fiscal years pursuant to the excess
cash flow sweep provisions. If only the minimum required
repayments are made, the annual aggregate principal amount of
the term loans repaid would be as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
2011 (January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011)
|
|
$
|
5,025
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013 (maturity)
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
641,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities on-hand will
be sufficient to meet our working capital, investing, financing
and contractual obligations and the contingent payments for
acquisitions, if any are realized, as they become due for at
least the next twelve months. We also believe that in the event
future operating results are not as planned, that we could take
actions, including restructuring actions and other cost
reduction initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels
which, in combination with expected future revenue, will
continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the
event that these actions are not effective in generating
operating cash flows we may be required to issue equity or debt
securities on terms that may be less favorable.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have agreed
to make contingent cash payments to the former shareholders of
certain of the acquired companies. The following represents the
contingent cash payments that we may be required to make.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin Software, Inc.
(SNAPin), we agreed to make a contingent earn-out
payment of up to $45.0 million in cash to be paid, if at
all, based on the business achieving certain performance targets
that are measurable from the acquisition date to
December 31, 2009. In April 2010, the Company and the
former shareholders of SNAPin agreed on a final earn-out payment
of $21.2 million and we issued 593,676 shares of our
common stock, valued at $10.2 million, as our first payment
under the earn-out agreement. The remaining balance is payable
in cash or stock, solely at our option, on or before
October 1, 2011 and is included in short-term liabilities
as of December 31, 2010.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada) in November 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured
30
over defined periods through December 31, 2010, in
accordance with the merger agreement. We have notified the
former shareholders of Vocada that the financial targets were
not achieved. In December 2010, the former shareholders filed a
demand for arbitration in accordance with their rights under the
merger agreement. At December 31, 2010, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these earn-out provisions.
In connection with the acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $8.0 million, payable in stock, or cash,
solely at our discretion, upon the achievement of certain
financial targets for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Earn-out payments, if any, will be recorded as incremental
purchase price and allocated to goodwill. We have provided the
following notices to the former shareholders of Comissure:
|
|
|
|
|
The financial targets for the fiscal year 2008 earnout were not
achieved and the related contingent earnout payment was not
earned;
|
|
|
|
The financial targets for the fiscal year 2009 earnout were not
achieved and the related contingent earnout payment was not
earned; and
|
|
|
|
The financial targets for the fiscal year 2010 earnout were
partially achieved and, accordingly, a contingent earnout
payment of $1.0 million was earned.
|
We intend to pay the fiscal year 2010 earnout in cash on or
before February 7, 2011.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through December 31, 2010, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices which could
affect operating results, financial position and cash flows. We
manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular
operating and financing activities and, when appropriate,
through the use of derivative financial instruments.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee and
Hungarian Forint.
A hypothetical change of 10% in appreciation or depreciation in
foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency
exchange rates at December 31, 2010 would not have a
material impact on our revenue, operating results or cash flows
in the coming year.
Periodically, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
against foreign currency fluctuations. These contracts may or
may not be designated as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. At December 31, 2010, we have foreign currency
contracts with a total notional value of approximately
$12.6 million designated as cash flow hedges. These
contracts all mature within the next twelve months. During the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, we established a program
that primarily uses forward contracts to offset the risks
associated with foreign currency exposures that arise from
transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currencies of our worldwide operations. We commenced this
program so that increases or decreases in our foreign currency
exposures are offset by gain or losses on the foreign currency
forward contracts. These contracts are not designated
31
as accounting hedges and generally are for periods less than
30 days. The notional contract amount of outstanding
foreign currency exchange contracts not designated as cash flow
hedges was $127.6 million at December 31, 2010. Based
on the nature of the transaction for which the contracts were
purchased, a hypothetical change of 10% in exchange rates would
not have a material impact on our financial results.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the Credit Facility.
At December 31, 2010, we held approximately
$554.4 million of cash and cash equivalents primarily
consisting of cash and money-market funds. Due to the low
current market yields and the short-term nature of our
investments, a hypothetical change in market rates of one
percentage point would not have a material effect on the fair
value of our portfolio or results of operations.
At December 31, 2010, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $641.9 million. To
partially offset this variable interest rate exposure, we may
use interest rate swaps to convert specific variable-rate debt
into fixed-rate debt. During the three months ended
December 31, 2010, our two interest rate swaps designated
as cash flow hedges expired. A hypothetical change in market
rates would have a significant impact on interest expense and
amounts payable. Assuming a one percentage point increase in
interest rates, our interest expense relative to our outstanding
debt would increase $6.4 million per annum.
Equity
Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk as a result of security
price guarantees that we enter in to from time to time.
Generally, these price guarantees are for a period of six months
or less, and require payment from either us to a third party, or
from the third party to us, based upon changes in our stock
price during the contract term. As of December 31, 2010, we
have security price guarantees outstanding for approximately
2.9 million shares of our common stock. A 10% change in our
stock price during the next six months would result in a
reduction of cash inflows of up to $5.3 million for a
decrease in the stock price or additional cash inflows of up to
$5.3 million for an increase in the stock price.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a
system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) designed to ensure that information we are required
to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
issuers management, including its principal executive
officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision
of, and with the participation of, management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to meet the requirements of
Rule 13a-15
under the Exchange Act.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes to our internal controls over financial
reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required
by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15
that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
32
Part II.
Other Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
This information is included in Note 18, Commitments and
Contingencies, in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements and is incorporated herein by reference
from Item 1 of Part I.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our intellectual
property portfolio;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition, market conditions or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
delayed realization of synergies resulting from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce
33
our expenses quickly to respond to a shortfall in projected
revenue. Therefore, our failure to meet revenue expectations
would seriously harm our operating results, financial condition
and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions. We may continue to
issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would
dilute existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on
the terms of such acquisitions. We may also incur additional
debt in connection with future acquisitions, which, if available
at all, may place additional restrictions on our ability to
operate our business.
Our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions
will depend on successfully integrating the acquired
businesses.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect future acquisitions to require
similar efforts. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with
in-process research and development;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote business units both in the
United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
accurate projection of revenue plans of the acquired entity in
the due diligence process;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired business.
|
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Accounting
treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net income or
expected revenue in the foreseeable future, which could have a
material and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
the acquisition and, for transactions which closed prior to
October 1, 2009, the amount of direct transaction costs as
the cost of acquiring the company or
34
business. We have allocated that cost to the individual assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, including various identifiable
intangible assets such as acquired technology, acquired
tradenames and acquired customer relationships based on their
respective fair values. Intangible assets are generally
amortized over a five to ten year period. Goodwill and certain
intangible assets with indefinite lives, are not subject to
amortization but are subject to an impairment analysis, at least
annually, which may result in an impairment charge if the
carrying value exceeds its implied fair value. As of
December 31, 2010, we had identified intangible assets of
approximately $655.4 million, net of accumulated
amortization, and goodwill of approximately $2.1 billion.
In addition, purchase accounting limits our ability to recognize
certain revenue that otherwise would have been recognized by the
acquired company as an independent business. As a result, the
combined company may delay revenue recognition or recognize less
revenue than we and the acquired company would have recognized
as independent companies.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility and our convertible debentures.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of December 31,
2010, we had a total of $893.0 million of gross debt
outstanding, including $641.9 million in term loans due in
March 2013 and $250.0 million in convertible debentures
which investors may require us to redeem in August 2014. We also
have a $75.0 million revolving credit line available to us
through March 2012. As of December 31, 2010, there were
$15.8 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line but there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could
have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on debt, including the convertible
debentures and the credit facility, which will reduce the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, research and development
expenditures and other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
related to our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds,
dispose of assets or pay cash dividends.
|
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives,
we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the
convertible debentures and our other debt.
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flows. While we have entered into interest rate swap
agreements limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, the
agreements do not offer complete protection from this risk.
Our
debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our
ability to operate our business.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets;
|
|
|
|
redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any entity.
|
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt agreements, which could
permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the
debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds available to repay the accelerated debt.
We
have a history of operating losses, and may incur losses in the
future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of $19.1 million, $19.4 million
and $37.0 million for the fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. If we are unable to achieve and maintain
profitability, the market price for our stock may decline,
perhaps substantially. We cannot assure you that our revenue
will grow or that we will achieve or maintain profitability in
the future. If we do not achieve and maintain profitability, we
may be required to raise additional capital to maintain or grow
our operations. Additional capital, if available at all, may be
highly dilutive to existing investors or contain other
unfavorable terms, such as a high interest rate and restrictive
covenants.
Voice
and language technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance,
which could limit our ability to grow our voice and language
business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of voice and language
technologies. The market for voice and language technologies is
relatively new and rapidly evolving. Our ability to increase
revenue in the future depends in large measure on the acceptance
of these technologies in general and our products in particular.
The continued development of the market for our current and
future voice and language solutions will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer and business demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using voice
and language technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in voice and language technology.
|
Sales of our voice and language products would be harmed if the
market for these technologies does not continue to develop or
develops slower than we expect, and, consequently, our business
could be harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with
our investment in these technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within voice and language, we compete with
AT&T, Microsoft, Google, and other smaller providers.
Within healthcare, we compete with Medquist and other smaller
providers. Within imaging, we compete with ABBYY, Adobe,
I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. In voice and language, some of our
partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel develop
and market products that can be considered substitutes for our
solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in voice,
language and imaging produce technologies or products that are
in some markets competitive with our
36
solutions. Current and potential competitors have established,
or may establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or
with third parties to increase the ability of their technologies
to address the needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, Microsoft and Google, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as Microsoft and Google, have
developed or acquired products or technologies that compete with
our products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological enhancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include
a report of management on internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K
that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to
and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. Any failure in the effectiveness of our
system of internal control over financial reporting could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to report our financial
statements in an accurate and timely manner, could subject us to
regulatory actions, civil or criminal penalties, shareholder
litigation, or loss of customer confidence, which could result
in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a
loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, which ultimately could negatively impact our stock
price.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived, and a significant
portion of our research and development activities are based,
outside the United States. Our results could be harmed by
economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with
these international regions.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations could increase in the
future. Most of our international revenue is generated by sales
in Europe and Asia. In addition, some of our products are
developed and manufactured outside the United States and we have
a large number of employees in India that provide transcription
services. A significant portion of the development and
manufacturing of our voice and language products is conducted in
Belgium and Canada, and a significant portion of our imaging
research and development is conducted in Hungary. We also have
significant research and development resources in Aachen,
Germany, and Vienna, Austria. Accordingly, our future results
could be harmed by a variety of factors associated with
international sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property than in the
United States.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. In certain circumstances, we have entered into forward
exchange contracts to hedge against foreign currency
fluctuations. We use these contracts to reduce our risk
associated with exchange rate movements, as the gains or losses
on these contracts are intended to offset any exchange rate
losses or gains on the hedged transaction. We do not engage in
foreign currency speculation. Forward exchange contracts hedging
firm commitments qualify for hedge accounting when they are
designated as a hedge of the foreign currency exposure and they
are effective in minimizing such exposure. With our increased
international presence in a number of geographic locations and
with international revenue and costs projected to increase, we
are exposed to changes in foreign currencies including the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee,
Singapore Dollar, Australian Dollar, Chinese Yuan, Israel
Shekel, and the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value of the
Euro or other foreign currencies relative to the value of the
U.S. dollar could adversely affect future revenue and
operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
that would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period;
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization or management reporting structure
that could result in additional reporting units, which may
require alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting
unit; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
Our
sales to government clients subject us to risks, including early
termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and
penalties.
We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with the
United States government, as well as various state and local
governments, and their respective agencies. Government contracts
are generally subject to audits and investigations which could
identify violations of these agreements. Government contract
violations could result in a range of consequences including,
but not limited to, contract price adjustments, civil and
criminal penalties,
38
contract termination, forfeiture of profit
and/or
suspension of payment, and suspension or debarment from future
government contracts. We could also suffer serious harm to our
reputation if we were found to have violated the terms of our
government contracts.
We conducted an analysis of our compliance with the terms and
conditions of certain contracts with the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA). Based upon our
analysis, we voluntarily notified GSA of non-compliance with the
terms of two contracts. The final resolution of this matter may
adversely impact our financial position.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability. Although we have systems and
policies in place for safeguarding protected health information
from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not
preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable
requirements. There can be no assurance that we will not be
subject to liability claims that could have a material adverse
affect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Adverse
changes in general economic or political conditions in any of
the major countries in which we do business could adversely
affect our operating results.
As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject
to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global
economic and political conditions. For example, the direction
and relative strength of the U.S. and global economies have
recently been increasingly uncertain due to softness in housing
markets, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades
of certain investments and declining valuations of others and
continuing geopolitical uncertainties. If economic growth in the
United States and other countries in which we do business is
slowed, customers may delay or reduce technology purchases and
may be unable to obtain credit to finance the purchase of our
products. This could result in reduced sales of our products,
longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. Any of these events would likely
harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Political
39
instability in any of the major countries in which we do
business would also likely harm our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Current
uncertainty in the global financial markets and the global
economy may negatively affect our financial
results.
Current uncertainty in the global financial markets and economy
may negatively affect our financial results. These macroeconomic
developments could negatively affect our business, operating
results or financial condition in a number of ways which, in
turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A prolonged period
of economic decline could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition and exacerbate
some of the other risk factors described herein. Our customers
may defer purchases of our products, licenses, and services in
response to tighter credit and negative financial news or reduce
their demand for them. Our customers may also not be able to
obtain adequate access to credit, which could affect their
ability to make timely payments to us or ultimately cause the
customer to file for protection from creditors under applicable
insolvency or bankruptcy laws. If our customers are not able to
make timely payments to us, our accounts receivable could
increase.
Our investment portfolio, which includes short-term debt
securities, is generally subject to credit, liquidity,
counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be
exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the
banking system or the fixed income, credit or equity markets
deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be
impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could
be adversely affected.
In addition, our operating results and financial condition could
be negatively affected if, as a result of economic conditions,
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for, and prices of, our products, licenses, or
services are reduced as a result of actions by our competitors
or otherwise; or
|
|
|
|
our financial counterparties or other contractual counterparties
are unable to, or do not, meet their contractual commitments to
us.
|
Security
and privacy breaches in our systems may damage client relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures in our security and
privacy measures could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. If we are unable
to protect, or our clients perceive that we are unable to
protect, the security and privacy of our electronic information,
our growth could be materially adversely affected. A security or
privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause our clients to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
harm our reputation;
|
|
|
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe we use proven applications designed for data
security and integrity to process electronic transactions, there
can be no assurance that our use of these applications will be
sufficient to address changing market conditions or the security
and privacy concerns of existing and potential clients.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to
40
obtain, license, sell or otherwise use information that we
regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products
is difficult and we may not be able to protect our technology
from unauthorized use. Additionally, our competitors may
independently develop technologies that are substantially the
same or superior to our technologies and that do not infringe
our rights. In these cases, we would be unable to prevent our
competitors from selling or licensing these similar or superior
technologies. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do
not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the
laws of the United States. Although the source code for our
proprietary software is protected both as a trade secret and as
a copyrighted work, litigation may be necessary to enforce our
intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others, or to defend against claims of infringement or
invalidity. Litigation, regardless of the outcome, can be very
expensive and can divert management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
We may
incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual
property rights and defending against third-party claims as a
result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual
property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights, or disputes relating to the validity or alleged
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights,
including patent rights, we have been, are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to claims, negotiations or complex,
protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and
litigation are typically very costly and can be disruptive to
our business operations by diverting the attention and energy of
management and key technical personnel. Although we have
successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes,
we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and
disputes. In addition, we may incur significant costs in
acquiring the necessary third party intellectual property rights
for use in our products. Third party intellectual property
disputes could subject us to significant liabilities, require us
to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable
terms, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our
products, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the
markets in which we compete, or require us to satisfy
indemnification commitments with our customers including
contractual provisions under various license arrangements. Any
of these could seriously harm our business.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
41
Risks
Related to our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our largest stockholder may enable it to influence
matters requiring stockholder approval.
As of December 31, 2010, Warburg Pincus, a global private
equity firm, beneficially owned approximately 23% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,562,422 shares of our common stock, and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. Because of its large holdings of our capital stock
relative to other stockholders, this stockholder has a strong
influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations, and this may make it difficult for
you to resell the common stock when you want or at prices you
find attractive.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our
largest stockholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to
raise funds in new stock offerings.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. For example, we issued, and registered for resale,
approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock in
connection with our December 2009 acquisition of SpinVox. No
prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future
sales of shares of common stock, or the availability of shares
of common stock for future sale, will have on the trading price
of our common stock.
42
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are filed or
incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the Town of Burlington, Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, on February 9, 2011.
Nuance Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
L. Beaudoin
|
Thomas L. Beaudoin
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
44
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
S-3
|
|
333-142182
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Letter, dated September 9, 2010, to Bruce Bowden regarding
certain employment matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan, as amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
|
|
The following materials from Nuance Communications, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes of Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensatory plan or arrangement |
45