e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 26, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-19528
QUALCOMM Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
95-3685934
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
92121-1714
(Zip Code) |
(858) 587-1121
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the
close of business on January 24, 2011, was as follows:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Number of Shares |
Common Stock, $0.0001 per share par value
|
|
1,643,746,036 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
3,547 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
5,798 |
|
|
|
6,732 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
12,331 |
|
|
|
12,133 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
8,598 |
|
|
|
8,123 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
31,291 |
|
|
$ |
30,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
Payroll and other benefits related liabilities |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
Unearned revenues |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
Loans payable |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
5,468 |
|
Unearned revenues |
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
|
9,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; issuable in series;
8 shares authorized; none outstanding at
December 26, 2010 and September 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 6,000 shares
authorized; 1,634 and 1,612 shares issued and
outstanding at December 26, 2010 and September 26, 2010,
respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
7,818 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
14,161 |
|
|
|
13,305 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
22,736 |
|
|
|
20,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
31,291 |
|
|
$ |
30,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and services |
|
$ |
2,213 |
|
|
$ |
1,663 |
|
Licensing and royalty fees |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income, net (Note 5) |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share announced |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Revenues related to non-monetary exchanges |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Income tax provision (less than) in excess of income tax payments |
|
|
(1,474 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Non-cash portion of share-based compensation expense |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Net realized gains on marketable securities and other investments |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
Net impairment losses on marketable securities and other investments |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
Payroll, benefits and other liabilities |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
Unearned revenues |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
Other investments and acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other items, net |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing under loans payable |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of loans payable |
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
Change in obligation under securities lending |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other items, net |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
3,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
Financial Statement Preparation. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by QUALCOMM Incorporated (collectively with its subsidiaries, the
Company or QUALCOMM), without audit, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and,
therefore, do not necessarily include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair
presentation of its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The condensed
consolidated balance sheet at September 26, 2010 was derived from the audited financial statements
at that date but may not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The Company operates and reports using a 52-53 week fiscal year
ending on the last Sunday in September. The three-month periods ended December 26, 2010 and
December 27, 2009 both included 13 weeks.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information for the interim periods
presented reflects all adjustments, which are only normal and recurring, necessary for a fair
statement of results of operations, financial position and cash flows. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2010.
Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an
entire fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted
earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of dilutive common
share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Companys share-based compensation plans
and shares subject to written put options, and the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive
effect of in-the-money share equivalents, which are calculated based on the average share price for
each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of
an award, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that the Company has not yet
recognized, and the estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when
an award is settled are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. The
incremental dilutive common share equivalents, calculated using the treasury stock method, for the
three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009
were 25,507,000 and 19,642,000,
respectively.
Employee stock options to purchase 60,792,000 and 121,849,000 shares of common stock during
the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, respectively, were outstanding but
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect would be
anti-dilutive. In addition, 467,000 and 419,000 shares of other common stock equivalents
outstanding during the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, respectively,
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect would
be anti-dilutive.
6
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Comprehensive Income. Total comprehensive income consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses and
subsequent changes in fair value related to certain
marketable debt securities, net of income taxes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Net unrealized gains on other marketable
securities and derivative instruments,
net of income taxes |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
Reclassification of net realized gains
on marketable securities and derivative instruments
included in net income, net of income taxes |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Reclassification of other-than-temporary losses on
marketable securities included in net income,
net of income taxes |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,230 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses
and subsequent changes in fair value related to certain
marketable debt securities, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Net unrealized gains on marketable
securities, net of income taxes |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
Net unrealized losses on derivative instruments,
net of income taxes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
757 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 26, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income included $23 million of
other-than-temporary losses on marketable debt securities related to factors other than credit, net
of income taxes.
7
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Share-Based Payments. Total share-based compensation expense was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense before income taxes |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Related income tax benefit |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded $13 million and $14 million in share-based compensation expense
during the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, respectively, related to
share-based awards granted during those periods. In addition, for the three months ended December
26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, $45 million and $13 million, respectively, were reclassified to
reduce net cash provided by operating activities with an offsetting increase in net cash provided
by financing activities to reflect the incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised in
those periods.
At December 26, 2010, total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock
options and restricted stock units granted prior to that date were $952 million and $402 million,
respectively, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 and 2.7
years, respectively. Net share-based awards, after forfeitures and cancellations, granted during
the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009 represented 0.4% and 1.2%,
respectively, of outstanding shares as of the beginning of each fiscal period. Total share-based
awards granted during the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009 represented
0.5% and 1.3%, respectively, of outstanding shares as of the end of each fiscal period.
Note 2. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date.
Applicable accounting guidance provides an established hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market
data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect
the Companys assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset
or liability. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 includes financial instruments for which quoted market prices for identical
instruments are available in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 includes financial instruments for which there are inputs other than quoted
prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 includes financial instruments for which fair value is derived from
valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable,
including the Companys own assumptions. |
Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurements. The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a
quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification
of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the Companys fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 26, 2010 (in millions):
8
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,983 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
government-related securities |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,885 |
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,614 |
|
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Debt mutual funds |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other investments (1) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
6,016 |
|
|
$ |
12,687 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
18,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Other liabilities (1) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised of the Companys deferred compensation plan liability and related assets which are invested in mutual funds. |
Marketable Securities. With the exception of auction rate securities, the Company obtains
pricing information from quoted market prices, recognized independent pricing vendors or multiple
pricing vendors, or quotes from brokers/dealers. The Company conducts reviews of its primary
pricing vendors to determine whether the inputs used in the vendors pricing processes are deemed
to be observable.
The fair value of other government-related securities and investment- and non-investment-grade
corporate bonds and notes is generally determined using standard observable inputs, including
matrix pricing or reported trades, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads,
two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids and/or offers.
The fair value of debt mutual funds is determined based on published net asset values. The
Company assesses the underlying assets to determine the funds valuation and whether fair value is
based on observable or unobservable inputs.
The fair value of mortgage- and asset-backed securities is derived from the use of matrix
pricing or cash flow pricing models in which inputs are observable, including contractual terms,
maturity, prepayment speeds, credit rating and securitization structure, to determine the timing
and amount of future cash flows. Certain mortgage- and asset-backed securities, principally those
that are rated below AAA, require use of significant unobservable inputs to estimate fair value,
including significant assumptions about prioritization of the payment schedule, default likelihood,
recovery rates and prepayment speed.
The fair value of auction rate securities is estimated by the Company using a discounted cash
flow model that incorporates transaction details such as contractual terms, maturity and timing and
amount of future cash flows, as well as assumptions related to liquidity and credit valuation
adjustments of market participants. Though the vast majority of the securities are pools of student
loans guaranteed by the U.S. government, prepayment speeds and illiquidity discounts are considered
significant unobservable inputs. Therefore, auction rate securities are included in Level 3.
Derivative Instruments. Derivative instruments include foreign currency option and forward
contracts to manage foreign exchange risk for certain foreign currency transactions and certain
balances denominated in a foreign currency. Derivative instruments are valued using standard
calculations/models that are primarily based on observable inputs, including foreign currency
exchange rates, volatilities and interest rates. Therefore, derivative instruments are included in
Level 2.
9
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Activity between Levels of the Fair Value Hierarchy. There were no significant transfers
between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three months ended December 26, 2010 or December 27, 2009.
When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within Level 3, the determination is
based upon the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. The
following table includes the activity for marketable securities classified within Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
Auction Rate |
|
|
Other Marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Beginning balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
Total unrealized gains included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
Auction Rate |
|
|
Other Marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Beginning balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
Total realized and unrealized (losses) gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in investment loss, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys policy is to recognize transfers into and out of levels within the fair
value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal month in which the actual event or change in circumstances
that caused the transfer occurs. Transfers into Level 3 during the three months ended December 27,
2009 primarily consisted of debt securities with significant inputs that became unobservable as a
result of an increased likelihood of a shortfall in contractual cash flows or a significant
downgrade in the credit ratings.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements. The Company measures certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. These assets include cost and equity method investments when they are deemed to
be other-than-temporarily impaired, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition or in
a nonmonetary exchange, and property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that are written
down to fair value when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired. During the three
months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, the Company did not have any significant
assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods
subsequent to initial recognition.
10
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3. Marketable Securities
Marketable securities were comprised as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury securities and government-related securities |
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
3,344 |
|
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
Debt mutual funds |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
5,798 |
|
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
7,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value option: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt mutual fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
5,798 |
|
|
$ |
6,732 |
|
|
$ |
8,598 |
|
|
$ |
8,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2010, the Company made an investment in a debt mutual fund for which the
Company elected the fair value option. The investment would have otherwise been recorded using the
equity method. The debt mutual fund has no single maturity date. At December 26, 2010, the Company
had an effective ownership interest in the debt mutual fund of 19%. Changes in fair value
associated with this investment are recognized in net investment income. The Company believes that
recording the investment at fair value and reporting the investment as a marketable security is
preferable to applying the equity method because the Company is able to redeem its shares at net
asset value, which is determined daily. At September 26, 2010, marketable securities included $400
million of time deposits that matured in December 2010.
At December 26, 2010, the contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities were as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
No Single |
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
One to |
|
|
Five to |
|
|
Greater Than |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
4,202 |
|
|
$ |
1,923 |
|
|
$ |
955 |
|
|
$ |
2,782 |
|
|
$ |
10,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with no single maturity date included mortgage- and asset-backed securities,
auction rate securities, non-investment-grade debt securities and debt mutual funds.
The Company recorded realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale marketable
securities as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Realized |
|
Gross Realized |
|
Net Realized |
For the three months ended |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Gains |
December 26, 2010 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
123 |
|
December 27, 2009 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
11
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Available-for-sale securities were comprised as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
December 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,419 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
2,931 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
10,538 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
10,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,957 |
|
|
$ |
999 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
2,701 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
10,795 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
11,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,104 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
13,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
investments in individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position deemed
to be temporary for less than 12 months and for more than 12 months, aggregated by investment
category (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
$ |
888 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Debt mutual funds |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,096 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,131 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 26, 2010, the Company concluded that the unrealized losses were temporary.
Further, for common and preferred stock with unrealized losses, the Company has the ability and the
intent to hold such securities until they recover, which is expected to be within a reasonable
period of time. For debt securities with unrealized losses, the Company does not have the intent to
sell, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell, such securities
before recovery or maturity.
The following table shows the activity for the credit loss portion of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt securities held by the Company (in millions):
12
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of credit losses |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Credit losses recognized on securities previously impaired |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Credit losses recognized on securities previously not impaired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Reductions in credit losses related to securities sold |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Accretion of credit losses due to an increase in cash flows expected
to be collected |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items
Accounts Receivable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Trade, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $2 and $3, respectively |
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
Long-term contracts |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current Liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Customer-related liabilities, including
incentives, rebates and other reserves |
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
Current portion of payable to Broadcom
for litigation settlement |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Payable for unsettled securities trades |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Other |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Investment Income, Net
13
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net realized gains on marketable securities |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Impairment losses on marketable securities |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Impairment losses on other investments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Equity in losses of investees |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Income Taxes
The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 14%
for fiscal 2011, compared to the 20% effective income tax rate in fiscal 2010. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, the United States government extended the federal research and development
tax credit to include qualified research expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2009 and
before January 1, 2012. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $32 million related to fiscal 2010 in
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 for the retroactive extension of this credit. The annual effective
tax rate for fiscal 2010 included tax expense of approximately $137 million that arose because
certain deferred revenue was taxable in fiscal 2010, but the resulting deferred tax asset will
reverse in future years when the Companys state tax rate will be lower as a result of California
tax legislation enacted in 2009.
The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 of 14% is less than the United States
federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of approximately 24% related to foreign earnings
taxed at less than the United States federal rate and benefits of approximately 3% related to the
research and development tax credit, partially offset by state taxes of approximately 5% and other
items of approximately 1%. The prior fiscal year rate was lower than the United States federal
statutory rate primarily due to benefits related to foreign earnings taxed at less than the United
States federal rate, partially offset by state taxes and tax expense related to the valuation of
deferred tax assets to reflect changes in California law.
Note 7 Stockholders Equity
Changes in stockholders equity for the three months ended December 26, 2010 were as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 26, 2010 |
|
$ |
20,858 |
|
Net income |
|
|
1,170 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
60 |
|
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans |
|
|
789 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
154 |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
18 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(314 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 26, 2010 |
|
$ |
22,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase Program. The Company did not repurchase any shares during the three
months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009. At December 26, 2010, approximately $1.7
billion remained authorized for repurchase under the Companys stock repurchase program. The stock
repurchase program has no expiration date.
Dividends. Cash dividends announced in the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December
27, 2009 were $0.19 and $0.17 per share, respectively. During the three months ended December 26,
2010 and December 27, 2009, dividends charged to retained earnings were $314 million and $284
million, respectively. On January 14, 2011, the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.19 per
share on the Companys common stock, payable on March 25, 2011 to stockholders of record as of
February 25, 2011, which will be recorded in the second fiscal quarter.
Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies
14
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Litigation. Tessera, Inc. v. QUALCOMM Incorporated: On April 17, 2007, Tessera filed a lawsuit
in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of Texas and a complaint with the
United States International Trade Commission (ITC) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930 against the Company and other companies, alleging infringement of two patents. The District
Court action is stayed pending resolution of the ITC proceeding, including all appeals. On May 20,
2009, the ITC issued a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order, both of which were
terminated when the patents expired on September 24, 2010. During the period of the exclusion
order, the Company shifted supply of accused chips for the United States market to a licensed
supplier of Tessera, and the Company continued to supply the United States market without
interruption. On December 21, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a
decision affirming the ITCs orders. The Company is considering further options on appeal. Tessera
may continue to seek back damages in the district court, but it may not seek injunctive relief due
to the expiration of the patents.
Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) Complaint: On January 4, 2010, the KFTC issued a written
decision, finding that the Company had violated South Korean law by offering certain discounts and
rebates for purchases of its CDMA chips and for including in certain agreements language requiring
the continued payment of royalties after all licensed patents have expired. The KFTC levied a fine,
which the Company paid in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company is appealing that decision
in the Korean courts. In fiscal 2006, two South Korean companies (Nextreaming and Thin Multimedia)
filed complaints with the KFTC alleging that certain of the Companys business practices with
respect to integration of multimedia functions in its chips violated South Korean antitrust
regulations. In December 2010, the KFTC announced that it has closed its investigation of those
allegations without further action.
Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) Complaint: The JFTC received unspecified complaints
alleging that the Companys business practices are, in some way, a violation of Japanese law. On
September 29, 2009, the JFTC issued a cease and desist order (CDO) concluding that the Companys
Japanese licensees were forced to cross-license patents to the Company on a royalty-free basis and
were forced to accept a provision under which they agreed not to assert their essential patents
against the Companys other licensees who made a similar commitment in their license agreements
with the Company. The CDO seeks to require the Company to modify its existing license agreements
with Japanese companies to eliminate these provisions while preserving the license of the Companys
patents to those companies. The Company disagrees with the conclusions that it forced its Japanese
licensees to agree to any provision in the parties agreements and that those provisions violate
Japans Anti-Monopoly Act. The Company has invoked its right under Japanese law to an
administrative hearing before the JFTC. In February 2010, the Tokyo High Court granted the
Companys motion and issued a stay of the CDO pending the administrative hearing before the JFTC.
The JFTC has had five hearing days to date, with an additional hearing day scheduled in February
2011, and additional hearing days yet to be scheduled.
Icera Complaint to the European Commission: On June 7, 2010, the European Commission (the
Commission) notified and provided the Company with a redacted copy of a complaint filed with the
Commission by Icera, Inc. alleging that the Company has engaged in anticompetitive activity. The
Company has been asked by the Commission to submit a preliminary response to the portions of the
Complaint disclosed to it, and the Company submitted its response in July 2010. The Company will
cooperate fully with the Commission.
Panasonic Arbitration: On August 5, 2009, Panasonic filed an arbitration demand alleging that
it does not owe royalties, or owes less royalties, on its WCDMA subscriber devices sold on or after
December 21, 2008, and that the Company breached the license agreement between the parties as well
as certain commitments to standards setting organizations. On January 31, 2010, Panasonic amended
the arbitration demand to include claims based on alleged misrepresentations and the Japanese
Antimonopoly Act and increased its claim for damages to include royalties it has paid on its WCDMA
subscriber devices sold prior to December 21, 2008. The arbitration demand seeks declaratory relief
regarding the amount of royalties due and payable by Panasonic, as well as the return of certain
royalties it had previously paid. The Company has responded to the arbitration demand, denying the
allegations and requesting judgment in its favor on all claims. The arbitration is
proceeding in phases. The first phase hearing was completed in July 2010. On October 15, 2010, the
arbitrator issued an interim order finding that the Company did not
breach the license agreement. The Company is now preparing for the
additional phases to address the other claims and allegations. Although the Company believes Panasonics claims are without merit, it has
deferred the recognition of revenue related to WCDMA subscriber unit royalties reported and paid by
Panasonic since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
15
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Formal Order of Private Investigation: On September 8, 2010, the Company was notified by the
Securities and Exchange Commissions Los Angeles Regional office (SEC) of a formal order of private
investigation. The Company understands that the investigation arose from a whistleblowers
allegations made in December 2009 to the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors and to
the SEC. The audit committee completed an internal review with the assistance of independent
counsel and independent forensic accountants. This internal review into the allegations and related
accounting practices did not identify any errors in the Companys financial statements. The Company
continues to cooperate with the SECs ongoing investigation.
Other: The Company has been named, along with many other manufacturers of wireless phones,
wireless operators and industry-related organizations, as a defendant in purported class action
lawsuits, and individually filed actions pending in federal court in Pennsylvania and Washington
D.C. superior court, seeking monetary damages arising out of its sale of cellular phones.
While there can be no assurance of favorable outcomes, the Company believes the claims made by
other parties in the foregoing matters are without merit and will vigorously defend the actions.
The Company has not recorded any accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the legal
proceedings described above based on the Companys belief that liabilities, while possible, are not
probable. Further, any possible range of loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The
Company is engaged in numerous other legal actions not described above arising in the ordinary
course of its business and, while there can be no assurance, believes that the ultimate outcome of
these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its operating results, liquidity or
financial position.
Litigation Settlement, Patent License and Other Related Items. On April 26, 2009, the Company
entered into a Settlement and Patent License and Non-Assert Agreement with Broadcom. The Company
agreed to pay Broadcom $891 million, of which $459 million was paid through December 26, 2010, and
the remainder will be paid ratably through April 2013. The Company recorded a pre-tax charge of
$783 million related to this agreement during fiscal 2009. At December 26, 2010, the carrying value
of the liability was $416 million, which also approximated the fair value of the contractual
liability, net of imputed interest.
India Spectrum Acquisition and Related Loans Payable. In June 2010, the Company won a 20 MHz
slot of Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) spectrum in four telecom circles in India as a result of
the completion of the BWA spectrum auction. The Company expects that licenses to operate wireless
networks on this spectrum will be assigned to the Company in the first half of calendar 2011 with
an initial license period of 20 years. At December 26, 2010 and September 26, 2010, the Company had
a $1.1 billion advance payment included in noncurrent other assets related to this spectrum. The
Company will amortize the spectrum licenses over the remaining license period commencing upon the
commercial launch of wireless services in India, which is expected to occur within five years of
the assignment date. The Companys goal is to attract one or more operator partners into a venture
(or ventures) for construction of an LTE network in compliance with the Indian governments rollout
requirement for the BWA spectrum, and then to exit the venture(s). The manner and timing of such
exit will be dependent upon a number of factors, such as market conditions and regulatory
considerations, among others.
In June 2010, in connection with the India BWA spectrum purchase, certain of the Companys
subsidiaries in India entered into a loan agreement with multiple lenders that was denominated in
Indian rupees. The loan had a fixed interest rate of 6.75% per year with interest payments due
monthly and was payable in full in December 2010. On December 13, 2010, the loan was refinanced
with new loan agreements that bear interest at an annual rate based on the highest base rate among
the bank lenders, which is reset quarterly, plus 0.25% (9.25% at December 26, 2010) with interest
payments due monthly. The new loans are due and payable in full in December 2012. However, each
lender has the right to demand prepayment of its portion of the outstanding loans on December 15,
2011 subject to sufficient prior written notice. As a result, the loans are classified as a
component of current liabilities. The loans can be prepaid without penalty on certain dates and are
guaranteed by QUALCOMM Incorporated and one of its subsidiaries. The loan agreements contain
standard covenants, which, among other things, limit actions by the subsidiaries that are party to
the loan agreements, including the incurrence of loans and equity investments, disposition of
assets, mergers and consolidations and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. At
December 26, 2010, the aggregate carrying value of the loans was $1.1 billion, which approximated
fair value.
Indemnifications. In general, the Company does not agree to indemnify its customers and
licensees for losses sustained from infringement of third-party intellectual property. However, the
Company is contingently liable under certain product sales, services, license and other agreements
to indemnify certain customers against certain types of liability and/or damages arising from
qualifying claims of patent infringement by products or services sold or provided by the Company.
The Companys obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time
16
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
and/or amount, and in some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties for
certain payments made by the Company. These indemnification arrangements are not initially measured
and recognized at fair value because they are deemed to be similar to product warranties in that
they relate to claims and/or other actions that could impair the ability of the Companys direct or
indirect customers to use the Companys products or services. Accordingly, the Company records
liabilities resulting from the arrangements when they are probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Reimbursements under indemnification arrangements have not been material to the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The Company has not recorded any accrual for contingent
liabilities at December 26, 2010 associated with these indemnification arrangements, other than
negligible amounts for reimbursement of legal costs, based on the Companys belief that additional
liabilities, while possible, are not probable. Further, any possible range of loss cannot be
estimated at this time.
Purchase Obligations. The Company has agreements with suppliers and other parties to purchase
inventory, other goods and services and long-lived assets. Noncancelable obligations under these
agreements at December 26, 2010 for the remainder of fiscal 2011 and for each of the subsequent
four years from fiscal 2012 through 2015 were approximately $1.4 billion, $153 million, $60
million, $19 million and $48 million, respectively, and $39 million thereafter. Of these amounts,
for the remainder of fiscal 2011 and for fiscal 2012, commitments to purchase integrated circuit
product inventories comprised $1.1 billion and $12 million, respectively.
Leases. The future minimum lease payments for all capital leases and operating leases at
December 26, 2010 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Total |
|
Remainder of fiscal 2011 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
2012 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
2013 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
2014 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
2015 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Amounts representing interest |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under noncancelable operating
leases, with terms ranging from less than one year to 35 years and with provisions in certain
leases for cost-of-living increases. The Company leases certain property under capital lease
agreements, primarily related to cell site leases that have an initial term of five to seven years
with renewal options of up to five additional renewal periods. In determining the capital lease
classification for the cell site leases upon commencement of each lease, the Company included all
renewal options. As a result of the restructuring plan (Note 10), the Company does not intend to
renew its existing site capital leases. As of December 26, 2010, the Company expects to write off
$186 million of cell site capital lease assets (which are included in buildings and improvements in
property, plant and equipment) and $215 million of its capital lease obligations (which are
included in other liabilities) at the end of the current contractual lease terms related to lease
renewal option periods thereafter. Any early terminations may impact the amounts that are written
off.
Note 9 Segment Information
The Company is organized on the basis of products and services. The Company aggregates four of
its divisions into the Qualcomm Wireless & Internet segment. Reportable segments are as follows:
|
|
|
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies (QCT) develops and supplies CDMA- and OFDMA-based
integrated circuits and system software for wireless voice and data communications,
multimedia functions and global positioning system products; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Technology Licensing (QTL) grants licenses or otherwise provides rights
to use portions of the Companys intellectual property portfolio, which includes certain
patent rights essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and sale of certain wireless
products, including, without limitation, products |
17
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
implementing cdmaOne, CDMA2000, WCDMA, CDMA TDD (including TD-SCDMA), GSM/GPRS/EDGE and/or
OFDMA standards, and collects license fees and royalties in partial consideration for
such licenses; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Wireless & Internet (QWI) comprised of: |
|
|
|
Qualcomm Internet Services (QIS) provides content enablement
services for the wireless industry and push-to-talk and other products and
services for wireless network operators; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Government Technologies (QGOV) provides development,
hardware and analytical expertise to United States government agencies involving
wireless communications technologies; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Enterprise Services (QES) provides satellite- and
terrestrial-based two-way data messaging, position reporting, wireless
application services and managed data services to transportation and logistics
companies and other enterprise companies; and |
|
|
|
|
Firethorn builds and manages software applications that enable
certain mobile commerce services. |
|
|
|
Qualcomm Strategic Initiatives (QSI) consists of the Companys strategic
investment activities, including FLO TV Incorporated (FLO TV), the Companys
wholly-owned wireless multimedia operator subsidiary. The Company has commenced a
restructuring plan under which it expects to shut down the FLO TV business and network
in March 2011 (Note 10). QSI makes strategic investments that the Company believes will
open new markets for CDMA and OFDMA technologies, support the design and introduction of
new CDMA and OFDMA products or possess unique capabilities or technology. Many of these
strategic investments are in early-stage companies and in wireless spectrum, such as the
BWA spectrum won in the auction in India. |
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on earnings (loss) before income
taxes (EBT). EBT includes the allocation of certain corporate expenses to the segments, including
depreciation and amortization expense related to unallocated corporate assets. Certain income and
charges are not allocated to segments in the Companys management reports because they are not
considered in evaluating the segments operating performance. Unallocated income and charges
include certain investment income (loss), certain share-based compensation and certain research and
development expenses and marketing expenses that were deemed to be not directly related to the
businesses of the segments. The table below presents revenues and EBT for reportable segments (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
QCT |
|
QTL |
|
QWI |
|
QSI |
|
Items |
|
Total |
For the three months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3,348 |
|
EBT |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
1,329 |
|
December 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,608 |
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,670 |
|
EBT |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
1,052 |
|
Reconciling items in the previous table were as follows (in millions):
18
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of intersegment revenues |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Other nonreportable segments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
Unallocated research and development expenses |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Unallocated selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Unallocated investment income, net |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Other nonreportable segments |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Intersegment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, unallocated
research and development expenses included $86 million and $72 million, respectively, and
unallocated selling, general and administrative expenses included $72 million and $68 million,
respectively, of share-based compensation expense. Unallocated cost of equipment and services
revenues was comprised entirely of share-based compensation expense.
Revenues from external customers and intersegment revenues were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QCT |
|
QTL |
|
QWI |
|
QSI |
For the three months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
2,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets are comprised of accounts receivable, finance receivables and inventories
for QCT, QTL and QWI. The QSI segment assets include certain marketable securities, notes
receivable, spectrum licenses, other investments and all assets of QSIs consolidated subsidiaries,
including FLO TV. QSI segment assets related to the FLO TV business totaled $1.3 billion at both
December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009. Reconciling items for total assets included $379 million
and $397 million at December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2009, respectively, of goodwill and other
assets related to the Companys QMT division, a nonreportable segment developing display technology
for mobile devices and other applications. Total segment assets differ from total assets on a
consolidated basis as a result of unallocated corporate assets primarily comprised of certain cash,
cash equivalents, marketable securities, property, plant and equipment, deferred tax assets,
goodwill and assets of nonreportable segments. Segment assets and reconciling items were as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QCT |
|
$ |
1,032 |
|
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
QTL |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
QWI |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
QSI |
|
|
2,718 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
Reconciling items |
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
26,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
31,291 |
|
|
$ |
30,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Restructuring
19
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
On December 20, 2010, the Company announced that it has agreed to sell substantially all of
the Companys 700 MHz spectrum for $1.9 billion, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing
conditions, including approval by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and clearance from the
U.S. Department of Justice. The agreement follows the Companys previously announced plan to
restructure and evaluate strategic options related to the FLO TV business and network. Under the
restructuring plan, the Company now expects that the FLO TV business and network will be shut down
in March 2011, and the Company is in the process of shutting down the MediaFLO Technologies
division. Restructuring activities under this plan were initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010 and are expected to be substantially complete by the end of fiscal 2012.
The Company estimates that it will incur future restructuring and restructuring-related
charges associated with this plan in the range of $300 million to $375 million, which consist of
asset impairments and accelerated depreciation of $250 million to $275 million and other costs of
$50 million to $100 million. Restructuring charges consist of lease exit costs, other contract
termination costs and certain severance costs. Restructuring-related charges include all other
charges associated with the execution of this plan and are expected to primarily consist of asset
impairment and accelerated depreciation. Future cash expenditures associated with this plan are
expected to be in the range of $135 million to $185 million. The restructuring charges will be
recorded in the QSI segment, and the restructuring-related charges will be recorded primarily in
the QSI segment.
During the three months ended December 26, 2010, the Company recorded restructuring and
restructuring-related costs of $68 million as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring-related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a rollforward of the restructuring accrual since inception of the plan,
which is reported as a component of accrued expenses (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Cash Payments |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract termination costs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Subsequent Event
On January 5, 2011, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement
under which it intends to acquire Atheros Communications, Inc. for $45 per share in cash, which
represented an enterprise value of approximately $3.1 billion on that date. The transaction has
been approved by the QUALCOMM and Atheros boards of directors and is subject to customary closing
conditions, including the receipt of domestic and foreign
regulatory approvals and the approval of Atheros stockholders. The transaction is expected to
close in the first half of calendar 2011.
20
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended September 26, 2010
contained in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially
from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks
described in the section entitled Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
Recent Developments
Revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $3.3 billion, with net income of $1.2
billion, which were impacted by the following key items:
|
|
|
We shipped approximately 118 million Mobile Station Modem (MSM) integrated circuits
for CDMA-based wireless devices, an increase of 28% compared to approximately 92 million
MSM integrated circuits in the year ago quarter. (1) |
|
|
|
Total reported device sales were approximately $34.0 billion, an increase of
approximately 39% compared to approximately $24.5 billion in the year ago quarter.
(2) |
Against this backdrop, the following recent developments occurred during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011with respect to key elements of our business or our industry:
|
|
|
Worldwide wireless subscriptions grew by approximately 4% to reach approximately 5.4
billion.(3) |
|
|
|
Worldwide 3G subscriptions (all CDMA-based) grew to approximately 1.2 billion,
approximately 23% of total wireless subscriptions, including approximately 510 million
CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO subscriptions and approximately 700 million WCDMA/HSPA/TD-SCDMA
subscriptions. (3) |
|
|
|
In the handset market, CDMA-based unit shipments grew an estimated 34% over the prior
year quarter, compared to an estimated increase of 13% across all technologies.
(4) |
|
|
|
We announced that we have agreed to sell substantially all of our 700 MHz spectrum
for $1.9 billion to AT&T, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions,
including approval by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and clearance from the
U.S. Department of Justice. The agreement follows our previously announced plan to
restructure and evaluate strategic options related to our FLO TV business and network. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, some customers built devices that incorporated
two MSMs. In such cases, which represent less than 1% of our gross volume, we count only
one MSM in reporting the MSM shipments. |
|
(2) |
|
Total reported device sales is the sum of all reported sales in U.S. dollars (as
reported to us by our licensees) of all licensed CDMA-based subscriber devices (including
handsets, modules, modem cards and other subscriber devices) by our licensees during a
particular period. Not all licensees report sales the same way (e.g., some licensees
report sales net of permitted deductions, such as transportation, insurance and packing
costs, while other licensees report sales and then identify the amount of permitted
deductions in their reports), and the way in which licensees report such information my
change from time to time. |
|
(3) |
|
According to Wireless Intelligence estimates as of January 24, 2011, for the quarter
ending December 31, 2010. Wireless Intelligence estimates for CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO
subscribers do not include Wireless Local Loop. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on current reports by Strategy Analytics, a global research and consulting firm,
in their November 2010 Global Handset Market Share Update. |
Our Business and Operating Segments
We design, manufacture, have manufactured on our behalf and market digital wireless
telecommunications products and services based on our CDMA technology and other technologies. We
derive revenues principally from sales of integrated circuit products, license fees and royalties
for use of our intellectual property, messaging and other services and related hardware sales,
software development and licensing and related services, software hosting services and services
related to delivery of multimedia content. Operating expenses primarily consist of cost of
equipment and services, research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses.
21
We conduct business primarily through four reportable segments. These segments are: Qualcomm
CDMA Technologies, or QCT; Qualcomm Technology Licensing, or QTL; Qualcomm Wireless & Internet, or
QWI; and Qualcomm Strategic Initiatives, or QSI.
QCT is a leading developer and supplier of CDMA- and OFMDA-based integrated circuits and
system software for wireless voice and data communications, multimedia functions and global
positioning system products. QCTs integrated circuit products and system software are used in
wireless devices, particularly mobile phones, tablets, laptops, data modules, handheld wireless
computers, data cards and infrastructure equipment. The integrated circuits for wireless devices
include the Mobile Station Modem (MSM), Mobile Data Modem (MDM), Qualcomm Single Chip (QSC),
Qualcomm Snapdragon (QSD), Radio Frequency (RF), Power Management (PM) and Bluetooth devices. The
baseband integrated circuits (MSM, MDM, QSC and OSD) for wireless devices and system software
perform voice and data communication, multimedia and global positioning functions, and our RF, PM
and Bluetooth devices perform radio conversion between RF and baseband signals, power management
and peripheral connectivity. QCTs system software enables the other device components to interface
with the integrated circuit products and is the foundation software enabling manufacturers to
develop devices utilizing the functionality within the integrated circuits. The infrastructure
equipment integrated circuits and system software perform the core baseband CDMA modem
functionality in the wireless operators base station equipment. QCT revenues comprised 63% and 60%
of total consolidated revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.
QCT utilizes a fabless production business model, which means that we do not own or operate
foundries for the production of silicon wafers from which our integrated circuits are made.
Integrated circuits are die cut from silicon wafers that have completed the assembly and final test
manufacturing processes. We rely on independent third-party suppliers to perform the manufacturing
and assembly, and most of the testing, of our integrated circuits. Our suppliers are also
responsible for the procurement of most of the raw materials used in the production of our
integrated circuits. We employ both turnkey and two-stage manufacturing business models to purchase
our integrated circuits. Turnkey is when our foundry suppliers are responsible for delivering fully
assembled and tested integrated circuits. Under the two-stage manufacturing business model, we
purchase die from semiconductor manufacturing foundries and contract with separate third-party
manufacturers for back-end assembly and test services. We refer to this two-stage manufacturing
business model as Integrated Fabless Manufacturing (IFM).
QTL grants licenses or otherwise provides rights to use portions of our intellectual property
portfolio, which includes certain patent rights essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and
sale of certain wireless products, including, without limitation, products implementing cdmaOne,
CDMA2000, WCDMA, CDMA TDD (including TD-SCDMA), GSM/GPRS/EDGE and/or OFDMA standards and their
derivatives. QTL receives license fees as well as ongoing royalties based on worldwide sales by
licensees of products incorporating or using our intellectual property. License fees are fixed
amounts paid in one or more installments. Ongoing royalties are generally based upon a percentage
of the wholesale (i.e., licensees) selling price of licensed products, net of certain permissible
deductions (e.g., certain shipping costs, packing costs, VAT, etc.). QTL revenues comprised 32% and
34% of total consolidated revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
vast majority of such revenues were generated through our licensees sales of cdmaOne, CDMA2000 and
WCDMA subscriber equipment products.
QWI, which includes Qualcomm Enterprise Services (QES), Qualcomm Internet Services (QIS),
Qualcomm Government Technologies (QGOV) and Firethorn, generates revenues primarily through mobile
information products and services and software and software development aimed at support and
delivery of wireless applications. QES sells equipment, software and services used by
transportation and other companies to connect wirelessly with their assets and workforce. Through
December 2010, QES has shipped approximately 1,446,000 terrestrial-based and satellite-based mobile
information units. QIS provides content enablement services for the wireless industry, including
Brew, the Plaza suite and other services. QIS also provides QChat push-to-talk, QPoint and other
products for wireless network operators. QGOV provides development, hardware and analytical
expertise involving wireless communications technologies to United States government agencies.
Firethorn builds and manages software applications that enable mobile commerce services. QWI
revenues comprised 5% of total consolidated revenues for the first quarter of both fiscal 2011 and
2010.
QSI consists of the Companys strategic investment activities, including FLO TV Incorporated
(FLO TV), our wholly-owned wireless multimedia operator subsidiary. QSI makes strategic investments
that we believe will open new markets for CDMA- and OFDMA-based technologies, support the design
and introduction of new CDMA and OFDMA products and services for wireless voice and internet data
communications or possess unique capabilities or technology. Many of these strategic investments
are in early-stage companies and in wireless spectrum, such as the BWA spectrum won in the auction
in India. On December 20, 2010, we announced that we have agreed to sell
22
substantially all of our 700 MHz spectrum for $1.9 billion, subject to the satisfaction of
customary closing conditions, including approval by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and
clearance from the U.S. Department of Justice. The agreement follows our previously announced plan
to restructure and evaluate strategic options related to our FLO TV business and network. Under the
restructuring plan, we now expect that our FLO TV business and network will be shut down in March
2011.
Nonreportable segments include: the Qualcomm MEMS Technologies division, which continues to
develop an interferometric modulator (IMOD) display technology based on
micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) structure combined with thin film optics; the MediaFLO
Technologies division, which we are in the process of shutting down; and other product initiatives.
Restructuring and Restructuring-Related Activities
We commenced a restructuring plan under which we now expect to shut down the FLO TV business
and network in March 2011 and are in the process of shutting down our MediaFLO Technologies
division. Restructuring activities were initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and are
expected to be substantially complete by fiscal 2012.
We estimate that we will incur restructuring and restructuring-related charges associated with
this plan in the range of $300 million to $375 million, which consist of asset impairment and
accelerated depreciation of $250 million to $275 million and other costs of $50 million to $100
million. Restructuring charges consist of lease exit costs, other contract termination costs and
certain severance costs. Restructuring-related charges include all other charges associated with
the execution of this plan and are expected to primarily consist of asset impairments and
accelerated depreciation. Future cash expenditures associated with this plan are expected to be in
the range of $135 million to $185 million. The restructuring charges will be recorded in the QSI
segment, and the restructuring-related charges will be recorded primarily in the QSI segment.
During the three months ended December 26, 2010, the Company recorded restructuring and
restructuring-related costs of $68 million as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring-related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looking Forward
The deployment of 3G networks enables increased voice capacity and higher data rates than
prior generation networks, thereby supporting more minutes of use and a wide range of mobile
broadband data applications for handsets, 3G connected computing devices and other consumer
electronics. Many wireless operators are also planning to complement their existing 3G networks by
deploying OFDMA-based technology, often called 4G, in new spectrum to gain additional capacity for
data services, such as in the recent launch of a LTE network by Verizon Wireless in the United
States. As a result, we expect continued growth in the coming years in consumer demand for 3G and
3G/4G multimode products and services around the world. As we look forward to the next several
months, the following items are likely to have an impact on our business:
|
|
|
The worldwide transition to 3G CDMA-based networks is expected to continue, including
the further expansion of 3G in China and India. |
23
|
|
|
We expect consumer demand for advanced 3G-based and 3G/4G multimode devices,
including smartphones, data-centric devices and new device categories, such as tablets and eBook
readers, to continue at a strong pace. We also expect growth in lower-end 3G devices as
3G expands in emerging regions. We still face significant competition in lower-end
devices from GSM-based products, particularly in emerging regions. |
|
|
|
We expect that CDMA-based device prices will continue to
segment into high, mid and low
end due to increased development of smartphones and the popularity of smartphone
applications on the high end and high volumes and active competition throughout the
world at all tiers. This, along with uneven economic growth and stronger
average growth in emerging regions, is expected to continue to impact the average
selling price of CDMA-based devices. |
|
|
|
We continue to invest significant resources toward the development of technology to
increase the data rates available with 3G and 4G networks, wireless baseband chips,
converged computing/communication chips, multimedia products, software and services for
the wireless industry. |
|
|
|
We continue to invest in the evolution of CDMA and a broad range of other
technologies, such as LTE, our IMOD display technology and our Snapdragon platform, as
part of our vision to enable a wide range of products and technologies. |
|
|
|
We resolved a licensee dispute which will be reflected in our
financial results beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
We commenced a restructuring plan under which we now expect to shut down our FLO TV
business and network in March 2011 and are in the process of shutting down our MediaFLO
Technologies division. We estimate that we will incur restructuring and
restructuring-related charges associated with this plan in the range of $300 million to
$375 million, and that approximately $135 million to $185 million will result in future
cash outlays. Restructuring activities were initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010 and are expected to be substantially complete by the end of fiscal 2012. |
|
|
|
On January 5, 2011, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement
under which we intend to acquire Atheros Communications, Inc. for $45 per share in cash,
which represented an enterprise value of approximately $3.1 billion on that date. The
transaction is expected to close in the first half of calendar 2011 subject to customary
closing conditions, including the receipt of domestic and foreign regulatory approvals
and the approval of Atheros stockholders. |
In addition to the foregoing business and market-based matters, we continue to devote
resources to working with and educating participants in the wireless value chain as to the benefits
of our business model in promoting a highly competitive and innovative wireless market. However,
we expect that certain companies may continue to be dissatisfied with the need to pay reasonable
royalties for the use of our technology and not welcome the success of our business model in
enabling new, highly cost-effective competitors to their products. We expect that such companies
will continue to challenge our business model in various forums throughout the world.
Further discussion of risks related to our business is presented in the Risk Factors included
in this Quarterly Report.
First Quarter of Fiscal 2011 Compared to First Quarter of Fiscal 2010
Revenues. Total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $3.35 billion, compared to
$2.67 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Revenues from sales of equipment and services for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $2.21
billion, compared to $1.66 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in revenues
from sales of equipment and services was primarily due to a $513 million increase in QCT equipment
and services revenues. Revenues from licensing and royalty fees for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 were $1.14 billion, compared to $1.01 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
increase in revenues from licensing and royalty fees was primarily due to a $139 million increase
in QTL revenues.
Cost of Equipment and Services. Cost of equipment and services revenues for the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 was $1.13 billion, compared to $816 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage of equipment and services revenues was 51%
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 49% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
decrease in margin percentage in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 was
primarily attributable to a decrease in QCT gross margin and the effect of an increase in costs
related to our FLO TV subsidiarys restructuring plan. Cost of equipment and services revenues in
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 included $14 million in share-based compensation, compared to $11
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Cost of equipment and services revenues as a
percentage of equipment and services revenues may
24
fluctuate in future quarters depending on the mix of products sold and services provided, competitive
pricing, new product introduction costs and other factors.
Research and Development Expenses. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, research and
development expenses were $671 million or 20% of revenues, compared to $596 million or 22% of
revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to a
$55 million increase in costs related to the development of integrated circuit products, next
generation CDMA and OFDMA technologies and other initiatives to support the acceleration of
advanced wireless products and services, including lower-cost devices, the integration of wireless
with consumer electronics and computing, the convergence of multiband, multimode, multinetwork
products and technologies, third-party operating systems and services platforms. The percentage
decrease was primarily attributable to a higher increase in revenues relative to the increase in
costs. Research and development expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 included share-based
compensation of $86 million, compared to $72 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, selling,
general and administrative expenses were $437 million or 13% of revenues, compared to $379 million
or 14% of revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The dollar increase was primarily
attributable to a $36 million increase in employee-related expenses and a $32 million increase in
patent-related costs and other professional fees, partially offset by a $17 million decrease in
selling and marketing expenses primarily related to our FLO TV subsidiary. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 included share-based compensation of
$72 million, compared to $68 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Net Investment Income (Loss). Net investment income was $219 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, compared to $173 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The net increase was
comprised as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, |
|
|
December 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Net realized gains on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
QSI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Net impairment losses on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
QSI |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Equity in losses of investees |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded lower impairment losses and higher
realized gains on marketable securities as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to
improvements in financial market conditions. The increase in interest expense is primarily
attributable to the loans related to the BWA spectrum won in the India auction in the third quarter
of fiscal 2010.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $159 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011,
compared to $211 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The effective tax rate for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 was 12%, compared to 20% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2011, the United States government extended the federal research and
development tax credit to include qualified research expenditures paid or incurred after December
31, 2009 and before January 1, 2012. We recorded a tax benefit of $32 million related to fiscal
2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the retroactive extension of this credit. The annual
effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 included tax expense of
approximately $137 million that arose
because certain deferred revenue was taxable in fiscal 2010, but the resulting deferred tax asset
will reverse in future years when the Companys state tax rate will be lower as a result of
California tax legislation enacted in 2009. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 of 12% was lower than the expected annual effective rate of 14% primarily as a result of the
benefit associated with the retroactive extension of the tax credit.
The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 of 14% is less than the United States
federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of approximately 24% related to foreign earnings
taxed at less than the United States
25
federal rate and benefits of approximately 3% related to the research and development tax
credit, partially offset by state taxes of approximately 5% and other items of approximately 1%.
Our Segment Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2011 Compared to the First Quarter of Fiscal
2010
The following should be read in conjunction with the first quarter financial results of fiscal
2011 for each reporting segment. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9
Segment Information.
QCT Segment. QCT revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $2.12 billion, compared to
$1.61 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Equipment and services revenues, mostly related
to sales of MSM and accompanying RF and PM integrated circuits, were $2.07 billion for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $1.55 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
increase in equipment and services revenues resulted primarily from a $550 million increase related
to higher unit shipments, partially offset by a decrease of $32 million related to the net effects
of changes in product mix and the average selling prices of such products. Approximately 118
million MSM integrated circuits were sold during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to
approximately 92 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.1
QCT earnings before taxes for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $640 million, compared to
$425 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. QCT operating income as a percentage of its
revenues (operating margin percentage) was 30% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 26%
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increases in QCT earnings before taxes and operating
margin percentage were primarily attributable to a higher increase in QCT revenues relative to the
increases in research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses, partially
offset by a decrease in gross margin percentage. QCT gross margin percentage decreased as a result
of the net effects of lower average selling prices, higher product support costs and a decrease in
average unit costs.
QCT inventories increased by 8% to $520 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from $481
million at September 26, 2010 primarily due to higher finished goods units on hand related to the
timing of inventory builds and changes in product mix.
QTL Segment. QTL revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $1.06 billion, compared to
$917 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. QTL revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2010
included $71 million attributable to fiscal 2009 that had previously not been recognized due to
discussions regarding a license agreement that was signed in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
$211 million increase in revenues without considering this amount was primarily due to an increase
in sales of CDMA-based devices by licensees. QTL earnings before taxes for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 were $892 million, compared to $772 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. QTL
operating margin percentage was 84% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 85% in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. The decrease in operating margin percentage was primarily
attributable to an increase in patent-related costs.
QWI Segment. QWI revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $172 million, compared to
$142 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Revenues increased primarily due to a $26
million increase in QES equipment and services revenues resulting primarily from higher unit
shipments of our asset-tracking products. QWI earnings before taxes for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 were negligible, compared to $9 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. QWI operating
margin percentage was less than 1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 6% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The decreases in QWI earnings before taxes and operating margin percentage
were primarily attributable to a decrease in QIS gross margin percentage and an increase in the
operating loss of Firethorn.
QSI Segment. QSI revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were negligible, compared to $2
million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. QSI loss before taxes for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 was $159 million, compared to $107 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. QSI loss
before taxes increased by $52 million primarily due to a $35 million increase in our FLO TV
subsidiarys loss before taxes and a $19 million increase in interest expense attributable to the
loans related to the BWA spectrum won in the India auction in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
We have commenced a restructuring plan under which we now expect to shut down the FLO TV
business and network in March 2011. QSI loss before taxes for the first quarter of 2011 included
$64 million related to this plan. In addition to our ongoing operating costs, we expect to incur
restructuring and restructuring-related charges associated with this plan in the range of $300
million to $375 million, which are primarily related to lease exit costs,
|
|
|
1 |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, some
customers built devices that incorporated two MSMs. In such cases, which
represent less than 1% of our gross volume, we count only one MSM in reporting
the MSM shipments. |
26
other contract termination costs and asset impairment and accelerated depreciation.
Restructuring activities were initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and are expected to be
substantially complete by the end of fiscal 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities, cash generated from operations and proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our
stock option and employee stock purchase plans. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
were $19.1 billion at December 26, 2010, an increase of $705 million from September 26, 2010. Our
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 26, 2010 consisted of $6.1 billion
held domestically and $13.0 billion held by foreign subsidiaries. Due to tax and accounting
considerations, we derive liquidity for operations primarily from domestic cash flow and
investments held domestically. Total cash provided by operating activities decreased to $48 million
during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $1.2 billion during the first quarter fiscal
2010. The decrease was primarily due to the payment of $1.5 billion to the United States tax
authorities in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
At December 26, 2010, approximately $1.7 billion remained authorized for repurchase under our
stock repurchase program. The stock repurchase program has no expiration date. While we did not
repurchase any of our common stock during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we continue to evaluate
repurchases under this program subject to capital availability and periodic determinations that
such repurchases are in the best interest of our stockholders.
We announced cash dividends totaling $309 million, or $0.19 per share, during the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, which were paid on December 22, 2010. On January 14, 2011, we announced a
cash dividend of $0.19 per share on our common stock, payable on March 25, 2011 to stockholders of
record as of February 25, 2011. We intend to continue to use cash dividends as a means of returning
capital to stockholders, subject to capital availability and periodic determinations that cash
dividends are in the best interests of our stockholders.
Accounts receivable decreased 10% during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Days sales
outstanding, on a consolidated basis, were 18 days at December 26, 2010, compared to 22 days at
September 26, 2010. The decreases in accounts receivable and the related days sales outstanding
were primarily due to the effects of timing of shipments and customer payments for receivables
related to integrated circuits. Shipments towards the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were
lower as a percentage of total shipments as compared to the prior quarter.
We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and our expected cash
flow generated from operations will provide us with flexibility and satisfy our working and other
capital requirements over the next fiscal year and beyond based on our current business plans. The
following working and other capital requirements are anticipated in fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
Our research and development expenditures were $671 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 and $2.5 billion in fiscal 2010, and we expect to continue to invest heavily
in research and development for new technologies, applications and services for the
wireless industry. |
|
|
|
Capital expenditures were $102 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and $426
million in fiscal 2010. We anticipate that capital expenditures will be more than three
times higher in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010, excluding the fiscal 2010 $1.1
billion advance payment on the BWA spectrum in India, primarily due to estimated capital
expenditures of $975 million related to the construction of a new manufacturing facility
in Taiwan for our QMT division, which is expected to be operational in fiscal 2012.
Future capital expenditures may also be impacted by transactions that are currently not
forecasted. |
|
|
|
Our purchase obligations for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, some of which relate
to research and development activities and capital expenditures, totaled $1.4 billion at
December 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
We anticipate incurring cash expenditures associated with the shut down of our FLO TV
business and network and our MediaFLO Technologies division in the range of $135 million
to $185 million, primarily related to lease exit costs and other contract termination
costs. Restructuring activities were initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and
are expected to be substantially complete by the end of fiscal 2012. We expect the
majority of the cash payments associated with this restructuring plan to be made by the
end of fiscal 2012. |
|
|
|
Cash used for strategic investments and acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was $66
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and $94 million in fiscal 2010. On January
5, 2011, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement under which we
intend to acquire Atheros Communications, Inc. for $45 per share in cash, which
represented an enterprise value of approximately $3.1 billion on that date.
|
27
|
|
|
We plan to use existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities to effect this
transaction, and we expect the transaction to close in the first half of calendar 2011.
We expect to continue making strategic investments and acquisitions to open new markets
for our technology, expand our technology, obtain development resources, grow our patent
portfolio or pursue new business opportunities. |
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the $1.1 billion short-term loan related to the
BWA spectrum purchase in India was refinanced with new loan agreements that bear
interest at an annual rate based on the highest base rate among the bank lenders, which
is reset quarterly, plus 0.25% with interest payments due monthly. The new loans are due
and payable in full in December 2012. However, each lender has the right to demand
prepayment of its portion of the outstanding loans on December 15, 2011 subject to
sufficient prior written notice. As a result, the loans are classified as a component of
current liabilities. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Settlement and Patent License and Non-Assert Agreement with Broadcom,
we are obligated to pay a remaining $432 million ratably through April 2013, including
imputed interest, of which $130 million is payable in the remainder of fiscal 2011. |
Contractual Obligations/Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no significant contractual obligations not fully recorded on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets or fully disclosed in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial
statements. Our consolidated balance sheet at December 26, 2010 includes an aggregate of $1.1
billion in loans that are payable in full in Indian rupees in December 2012. We have no material
off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in S-K 303(a)(4)(ii).
Additional information regarding our financial commitments at December 26, 2010 is provided in
the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, Note 6 Income Taxes, Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies and Note
11 Subsequent Event.
Risk Factors
You should consider each of the following factors as well as the other information in this
Quarterly Report in evaluating our business and our prospects. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be harmed. In
that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline. You should also refer to the other
information set forth in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 26, 2010, including our financial statements and the related notes.
Risks Related to Our Businesses
Our revenues are dependent on the commercial deployment of our CDMA- and OFDMA-based technologies
and upgrades of 3G and 3G/4G multimode wireless communications equipment, products and services
based on our technologies.
We develop, patent and commercialize CDMA- and OFDMA-based technologies. Our revenues are
dependent upon the commercial deployment of our technologies and upgrades of 3G and 3G/4G multimode
wireless communications equipment, products and services based on our technologies. Our business
may be harmed, and our investments in these technologies may not provide us an adequate return if:
|
|
|
wireless operators delay 3G and/or 3G/4G multimode deployments, expansions or upgrades; |
|
|
|
LTE, an OFDMA-based wireless standard, is not widely deployed or commercial deployment
is delayed; or |
|
|
|
wireless operators deploy other technologies. |
Our business is dependent on our ability to increase our market share and to continue to drive
the adoption of our products and services into 3G, 3G/4G multimode and 4G wireless device markets.
We are also dependent on the success of our customers, licensees and CDMA- and OFDMA-based wireless
operators, as well as the timing of their deployment of new services. Our licensees and CDMA- or
OFDMA-based wireless operators may incur lower gross margins on products or services based on our
technologies than on products using alternative technologies as a result of greater competition or
other factors. If commercial deployment of our technologies and upgrades to 3G, 3G/4G multimode or
4G wireless communications equipment, products and services based on our technologies do not
continue or are delayed, our revenues could be negatively impacted, and our business could suffer.
Our revenues can be impacted by the deployment of other technologies in place of CDMA- and/or
OFDMA-based technologies or by the need to extend certain existing license agreements to cover
additional later patents.
28
Although we own a very strong portfolio of issued and pending patents related to GSM,
GPRS, EDGE, OFDM, OFDMA and/or Multiple Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) technologies, our patent
portfolio licensing program in these areas is less established and might not be as successful in
generating licensing income as our CDMA portfolio licensing program. Many wireless operators are
investigating or have selected LTE (or to a lesser extent WiMax) as next-generation technologies
for deployment in existing or future spectrum bands as complementary to their existing CDMA-based
networks. Although we believe that our patented technology is essential and useful to
implementation of the LTE and WiMax industry standards and have granted royalty-bearing licenses to
nine companies to make and sell products implementing those standards but not implementing 3G
standards, we might not achieve the same royalty revenues on such LTE or WiMax products as on
CDMA-based or multimode CDMA/OFDMA-based products.
The licenses granted to and from us under a number of our license agreements include only
patents that are either filed or issued prior to a certain date and, in a small number of
agreements, royalties are payable on those patents for a specified time period. As a result, there
are agreements with some licensees where later patents are not licensed by or to us under our
license agreements. In order to license any such later patents, we will need to extend or modify
our license agreements or enter into new license agreements with such licensees. We might not be
able to modify such license agreements in the future to license any such later patents or extend
such date(s) to incorporate later patents without affecting the material terms and conditions of
our license agreements with such licensees, and such modifications may impact our revenues.
Global economic conditions that impact the wireless communications industry could negatively affect
the demand for our products and our customers products, which may negatively affect our revenues.
Despite the improvements in market conditions, a future decline in global economic conditions,
particularly in geographic regions with high customer concentrations, could have adverse,
wide-ranging effects on demand for our products and for the products of our customers, particularly
wireless communications equipment manufacturers or others in the wireless industry, such as
wireless operators. Other unexpected negative events may have adverse effects on the economy, on
demand for wireless device products or on wireless device inventories at equipment manufacturers
and wireless operators. In addition, our direct and indirect customers ability to purchase or pay
for our products and services, obtain financing and upgrade wireless networks could be adversely
affected by economic conditions, leading to cancellation or delay of orders for our products.
Our industry is subject to competition in an environment of rapid technological change that could
result in decreased demand for our products and the products of our customers and licensees,
declining average selling prices for our licensees products and our products and/or new
specifications or requirements placed upon our products, each of which could negatively affect our
revenues and operating results.
Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and we must make substantial
investments in new products, services and technologies to compete successfully. New technological
innovations generally require a substantial investment before they are commercially viable. We
intend to continue to make substantial investments in developing new products and technologies, and
it is possible that our development efforts will not be successful and that our new technologies
will not result in meaningful revenues. Our products, services and technologies face significant
competition, and we cannot assure you that the revenues generated or the timing of their
deployment, which may be dependent on the actions of others, will meet our expectations.
Competition in the telecommunications market is affected by various factors that include, among
others: evolving industry standards, evolving methods of transmission for wireless voice and data
communications; value-added features that drive replacement rates and selling prices; scalability
and the ability of the system technology to meet customers immediate and future network
requirements.
Our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to:
|
|
|
continue to keep pace with technological developments; |
|
|
|
|
drive adoption of our integrated circuit products across a broad spectrum of wireless
devices sold by our customers and licensees; |
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products, services, technologies and enhancements on a timely
basis; |
|
|
|
|
effectively develop and commercialize turnkey, integrated product offerings that
incorporate our integrated circuits, software, user interface and applications; |
|
|
|
|
become a preferred partner for operating system platforms, such as Android and Windows
Mobile; |
29
|
|
|
focus our service businesses on key platforms that create standalone value or contribute
to the success of our other businesses; and |
|
|
|
|
succeed in significant foreign markets, such as China, India and Europe. |
Companies that promote non-CDMA technologies (e.g., GSM, WiMax) and companies that design
CDMA-based integrated circuits are generally competitors or potential competitors. Examples (some
of whom are strategic partners of ours in other areas) include Broadcom, Freescale, Fujitsu, Icera,
Infineon, Intel, Marvell Technology, Mediatek, nVidia, Renesas Electronics, ST-Ericsson (a joint
venture between Ericsson Mobile Platforms and ST-NXP Wireless), Texas Instruments and VIA Telecom.
Many of these current and potential competitors have advantages over us that include, among others:
motivation by our customers in certain circumstances to find alternate suppliers; government
support of other technologies; and more extensive relationships with indigenous distribution and
original equipment manufacturer (OEM) companies in developing territories (e.g., China).
In addition to the foregoing, we have seen, and believe we will continue to see, an increase
in customers requesting that we develop products, including chipsets and associated software, that
will incorporate open source software elements and operate in an open source environment, which
may offer accessibility to a portion of a products source code and may expose related intellectual
property to adverse licensing conditions. Developing open source products, with regard to
adequately protecting the intellectual property rights upon which our licensing business depends,
may prove burdensome under certain circumstances, thereby placing us at a competitive disadvantage
for new product designs.
Competition may reduce average selling prices for our chipset products and the products of our
customers and licensees. Reductions in the average selling prices of our licensees products,
unless offset by an increase in volumes, generally result in reduced royalties payable to us. We
anticipate that additional competitors will enter our markets as a result of growth opportunities
in wireless telecommunications, the trend toward global expansion by foreign and domestic
competitors, technological and public policy changes and relatively low barriers to entry in
selected segments of the industry.
We derive a significant portion of our consolidated revenues from a small number of customers and
licensees. If revenues derived from these customers or licensees decrease, our operating results
could be negatively affected.
Our QCT segment derives a significant portion of revenues from a small number of customers.
The loss of any one of our QCT segments significant customers or the delay, even if only
temporary, or cancellation of significant orders from any of these customers would reduce our
revenues in the period of the deferral or cancellation and harm our ability to achieve or sustain
expected levels of operating results. Accordingly, unless and until our QCT segment diversifies and
expands its customer base, our future success will largely depend upon the timing and size of any
future purchase orders from these customers.
Although we have more than 190 licensees, our QTL segment derives a significant portion of
royalty revenues from a limited number of licensees. Our future success depends upon the ability of
our licensees to develop, introduce and deliver high-volume products that achieve and sustain
market acceptance. We have little or no control over the sales efforts of our licensees, and our
licensees might not be successful. Reductions in the average selling price of wireless
communications devices sold by our major licensees, without a sufficient increase in the volumes of
such devices sold, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.
Efforts by some telecommunications equipment manufacturers to avoid paying fair and reasonable
royalties for the use of our intellectual property may create uncertainty about our future business
prospects, may require the investment of substantial management time and financial resources, and
may result in legal decisions and/or actions by foreign governments, Standards Development
Organizations (SDOs) or other industry groups that harm our business.
A small number of companies have initiated various strategies in an attempt to renegotiate,
mitigate and/or eliminate their need to pay royalties to us for the use of our intellectual
property in order to negatively affect our business model and that of our other licensees. These
strategies have included (i) litigation, often alleging infringement of patents held by such
companies, patent misuse, patent exhaustion and patent and license unenforceability, or some form
of unfair competition, (ii) taking positions contrary to our understanding of their contracts with
us, (iii) appeals to governmental authorities, (iv) collective action, including working with
carriers, standards bodies, other like-minded companies and other organizations, on both formal and
informal bases, to adopt intellectual property policies and practices that could have the effect of
limiting returns on intellectual property innovations, and (v) lobbying with governmental
regulators and elected officials for the purpose of seeking the
30
imposition of some form of compulsory licensing and/or to weaken a patent holders ability to
enforce its rights or obtain a fair return for such rights. Some companies have proposed
significant changes to existing intellectual property policies for implementation by SDOs and other
industry organizations, some of which would require a maximum aggregate intellectual property
royalty rate for the use of all essential patents owned by all of the member companies to be
applied to the selling price of any product implementing the relevant standard. They have further
proposed that such maximum aggregate royalty rate be apportioned to each member company with
essential patents based upon the number of essential patents held by such company. A number of
these strategies are purportedly based on interpretations of the policies of certain standards
development organizations concerning the licensing of patents that are or may be essential to
industry standards and our alleged failure to abide by these policies. There is a risk that
relevant courts or governmental agencies will interpret those policies in a manner adverse to our
interests. If such proposals and strategies are successful in the future, our business model would
be harmed, either by artificially limiting our return on investment with respect to new
technologies or forcing us to work outside of the SDOs or such other industry groups to promote our
new technologies, and our results of operations could be negatively impacted. As well, the legal
and other costs associated with defending our position have been and continue to be significant. We
assume that such challenges regardless of their merits will continue into the foreseeable future
and may require the investment of substantial management time and financial resources to explain
and defend our position.
The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive, could fail to
prevent misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary intellectual property rights or
could result in the loss of our ability to enforce one or more patents.
We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary
information, technologies and processes, including our patent portfolio. Policing unauthorized use
of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. We cannot be certain that the
steps we have taken, or may take in the future, will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized
use of our proprietary information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the
laws may not protect our proprietary intellectual property rights as fully or as readily as United
States laws. We cannot be certain that the laws and policies of any country, including the United
States, or the practices of any of the standards bodies, foreign or domestic, with respect to
intellectual property enforcement or licensing, issuance of spectrum licenses or the adoption of
standards, will not be changed in a way detrimental to our licensing program or to the sale or use
of our products or technology. We may have difficulty in protecting or enforcing our intellectual
property rights and/or contracts in a particular foreign jurisdiction, including: challenges to our
licensing practices under such jurisdictions competition laws; adoption of mandatory licensing
provisions by foreign jurisdictions (either with controlled/regulated royalties or royalty free);
and challenges pending before foreign competition agencies to the pricing and integration of
additional features and functionality into our wireless chipset products.
A substantial portion of our patents and patent applications relate to our wireless
communications technology and much of the remainder of our patents and patent applications relate
to our other technologies and products. We may need to litigate to enforce our intellectual
property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary
rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our ability to enforce one or
more patents or incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Any action we take to enforce our
intellectual property rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and
attention, which, in turn, could negatively impact our operating results.
Claims by other companies that we infringe their intellectual property or that patents on which we
rely are invalid could adversely affect our business.
From time to time, companies have asserted, and may again assert, patent, copyright and other
intellectual property rights against our products or products using our technologies or other
technologies used in our industry. These claims have resulted and may again result in our
involvement in litigation. We may not prevail in such litigation given the complex technical issues
and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If any of our products were found
to infringe on another companys intellectual property rights, we could be subject to an injunction
or required to redesign our products, which could be costly, or to license such rights and/or pay
damages or other compensation to such other company. If we were unable to redesign our products,
license such intellectual property rights used in our products or otherwise distribute our products
through a licensed supplier, we could be prohibited from making and selling such products. In any
potential dispute involving other companies patents or other intellectual property, our chipset
foundries and customers could also become the targets of litigation. We are
31
contingently liable under certain product sales, services, license and other agreements to
indemnify certain customers against certain types of liability and/or damages arising from
qualifying claims of patent infringement by products or services sold or provided by us.
Reimbursements under indemnification arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations. Furthermore, any such litigation could severely disrupt the supply of our
products and the business of our chipset customers and their wireless operator customers, which in
turn could hurt our relationships with our chipset customers and wireless operators and could
result in a decline in our chipset sales and/or a reduction in our licensees sales to wireless
operators, causing a corresponding decline in our chipset and/or licensing revenues. Any claims,
regardless of their merit, could be time consuming to address, result in costly litigation, divert
the efforts of our technical and management personnel or cause product release or shipment delays,
any of which could have a material adverse effect upon our operating results.
We expect that we will continue to be involved in litigation and may have to appear in front
of administrative bodies (such as the U.S. International Trade Commission) to defend against patent
assertions against our products by companies, some of whom are attempting to gain competitive
advantage or leverage in licensing negotiations. We may not be successful in such proceedings, and
if we are not, the range of possible outcomes includes everything from a royalty payment to an
injunction on the sale of certain of our chipsets (and on the sale of our customers devices using
our chipsets) and the imposition of royalty payments that might make purchases of our chipsets less
economical for our customers. A negative outcome in any such proceeding could severely disrupt the
business of our chipset customers and their wireless operator customers, which in turn could hurt
our relationships with our chipset customers and wireless operators and could result in a decline
in our share of worldwide chipset sales and/or a reduction in our licensees sales to wireless
operators, causing a corresponding decline in our chipset and/or licensing revenues.
A number of other companies have claimed to own patents essential to various CDMA standards,
GSM standards and OFDMA standards or implementations of OFDM and OFDMA systems. If we or other
product manufacturers are required to obtain additional licenses and/or pay royalties to one or
more patent holders, this could have a material adverse effect on the commercial implementation of
our CDMA, GSM, OFDMA or multimode products and technologies, demand for our licensees products and
our profitability.
Other companies or entities also have commenced, and may again commence, actions seeking to
establish the invalidity of our patents. In the event that one or more of our patents are
challenged, a court may invalidate the patent(s) or determine that the patent(s) is not
enforceable, which could harm our competitive position. If our key patents are invalidated, or if
the scope of the claims in any of these patents is limited by court decision, we could be prevented
from licensing the invalidated or limited portion of such patents. Such adverse decisions could
negatively impact our revenues. Even if such a patent challenge is not successful, it could be
expensive and time consuming to address, divert management attention from our business and harm our
reputation.
Our earnings and stock price are subject to
substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market downturns.
The stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology-based and wireless
communications companies in particular, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated
to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock
has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future as well. Factors that may have
a significant impact on the market price of our stock include, among others:
|
|
|
announcements concerning us or our competitors, including the selection of wireless
communications technology by wireless operators and the timing of the roll-out of those
systems; |
|
|
|
|
international developments, such as technology mandates, political developments or
changes in economic policies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in recommendations of securities analysts; |
|
|
|
|
proprietary rights or product or patent litigation against us or against our
customers or licensees; |
|
|
|
|
strategic transactions, such as spin-offs, acquisitions and divestitures; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected and/or significant changes in the average selling price of our licensees
products and our products; |
|
|
|
|
unresolved disputes with licensees that result in non-payment and/or non-recognition
of royalty revenues that may be owed to us; or |
|
|
|
|
rumors or allegations regarding our financial disclosures or practices. |
32
In the past, securities class action litigation often has been brought against a company
following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. Due to changes in the
potential volatility of our stock price, we may be the target of securities litigation in the
future. Securities litigation could result in substantial uninsured costs and divert managements
attention and resources.
Any prolonged financial or economic crisis may result in a downturn in demand for our products
or technology; the insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays; delays in reporting
and/or payments from our licensees and/or customers; and counterparty failures negatively impacting
our treasury operations.
Financial market volatility has impacted, and could continue to impact, the value and
performance of our marketable securities. Net investment income could vary depending on the gains
or losses realized on the sale or exchange of securities, impairment charges related to marketable
securities and other investments, changes in interest rates and changes in fair values of
derivative instruments. Our cash equivalent and marketable securities investments represent
significant assets that may be subject to fluctuating or even negative returns depending upon
interest rate movements and financial market conditions in fixed income and equity securities.
These factors affecting our future earnings are difficult to forecast and could harm our
quarterly and/or annual operating results. If our earnings fail to meet the financial guidance we
provide to investors, or the expectations of investment analysts or investors in any period,
securities class action litigation could be brought against us and/or the market price of our
common stock could decline.
We depend upon a limited number of third-party suppliers to manufacture and test component parts,
subassemblies and finished goods for our products. If these third-party suppliers do not allocate
adequate manufacturing and test capacity in their facilities to produce products on our behalf, or
if there are any disruptions in the operations of, or a loss of, any of these third parties, it
could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers, reduce our revenues,
increase our cost of sales and harm our business.
Our ability to meet customer demand depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and
adequate delivery of parts and components from our suppliers. A reduction or interruption in our
product supply source, an inability of our suppliers to react to shifts in product demand or an
increase in component prices could have a material adverse effect on our business or profitability.
The loss of a significant supplier or the inability of a supplier to meet performance and quality
specifications or delivery schedules could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our
customers and negatively impact our revenues and business operations. In the event of a loss of, or
a decision to change, a supplier, qualifying a new foundry supplier and commencing volume
production or testing could involve delay and expense, resulting in possible loss of customers.
While our goal is to establish alternate suppliers for technologies that we consider critical,
we rely on sole- or limited-source suppliers for some products, subjecting us to significant risks,
including: possible shortages of manufacturing capacity; poor product performance; and reduced
control over delivery schedules, manufacturing capability and yields, quality assurance, quantity
and costs. Our arrangements with our suppliers may oblige us to incur costs to manufacture and test
our products that do not decrease at the same rate as decreases in pricing to our customers.
QCT Segment. Although we have entered into long-term contracts with our suppliers, most of
these contracts do not provide for long-term capacity commitments, except as may be provided in a
particular purchase order that has been accepted by our supplier. To the extent that we do not have
firm commitments from our suppliers over a specific time period, or for any specific quantity, our
suppliers may allocate, and in the past have allocated, capacity to the production and testing of
products for their other customers while reducing capacity to manufacture or test our products.
Accordingly, capacity for our products may not be available when we need it or available at
reasonable prices. We have experienced capacity limitations from our suppliers, which resulted in
supply constraints and our inability to meet certain customer demand. There can be no assurance
that we will not experience these or other supply constraints in the future, which could result in
our failure to meet customer demand. In addition, the timely readiness of our foundry suppliers to
support transitions to smaller geometry process technologies could impact our ability to meet
customer demand, revenues and cost expectations. The timing of acceptance of the smaller technology
designs by our customers may subject us to the risk of excess inventories of earlier designs.
QMT Division. Our QMT division needs to form and maintain reliable business relationships with
component supply partners to support the manufacture of interferometric modulator (IMOD) displays
and/or modules in commercial volumes. All of our current relationships have been for the
development and limited production of certain IMOD display panels and/or modules. Some or all of
these relationships may not succeed or, even if they are successful, may not result in the
component supply partners entering into material supply relationships with us.
33
Our suppliers may also be our competitors, putting us at a disadvantage for pricing and capacity
allocation.
One or more of our suppliers may obtain licenses from us to manufacture CDMA-based integrated
circuits that compete with our products. In this event, the supplier could elect to allocate raw
materials and manufacturing capacity to their own products and reduce deliveries to us to our
detriment. In addition, we may not receive reasonable pricing, manufacturing or delivery terms. We
cannot guarantee that the actions of our suppliers will not cause disruptions in our operations
that could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers or increase our cost
of sales.
Currency fluctuations could negatively affect future product sales or royalty revenues, harm
our ability to collect receivables or increase the U.S. dollar cost of the activities of our
foreign subsidiaries and international strategic investments.
Our international customers sell their products to markets throughout the world, including
China, India, Japan, South Korea, North America, South America and Europe. Consolidated revenues
from international customers as a percentage of total revenues were greater than 90% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 and in the last three fiscal years. We are exposed to risk from fluctuations
in currencies that could negatively affect our operating results. Adverse movements in currency
exchange rates may negatively affect our business due to a number of situations, including the
following, among others:
|
|
|
Our products and those of our customers and licensees that are sold into
foreign markets may become less price-competitive as a result of adverse currency
fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
Certain of our revenues, such as royalty revenues, are derived from licensee or
customer sales that are denominated in foreign currencies. Weakening of currency values
in selected regions could adversely affect our revenues and cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
We may engage in foreign exchange hedging transactions that could affect our cash
flows and earnings because they may require the payment of structuring fees, limit the
U.S. dollar value of royalties from licensees sales that are denominated in foreign
currencies, cause earnings volatility if the hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting
and expose us to counterparty risk if the counterparty fails to perform; |
|
|
|
|
Our loans payable are denominated in Indian rupees. If the U.S. dollar significantly
weakens, additional cash may be required to settle this obligation and the related
interest; and |
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may reduce the U.S. dollar value of our
marketable securities that are denominated directly or indirectly in foreign currencies. |
We may engage in acquisitions or strategic transactions or make investments that could result in
significant changes or management disruption and fail to enhance stockholder value.
From time to time, we engage in acquisitions or strategic transactions or make investments
with the goal of maximizing stockholder value. We acquire businesses and other assets, including
spectrum licenses, enter into joint ventures or other strategic transactions and purchase equity
and debt securities, including minority interests in publicly-traded and private companies. Many of
our strategic investments are in early-stage companies to support our business, including the
global adoption of CDMA- or OFDMA-based technologies and related services. Most of our acquisitions
or strategic investments entail a high degree of risk and will not become liquid until more than
one year from the date of investment, if at all. Our acquisitions or strategic investments (either
those we have completed or may undertake in the future) may not generate financial returns or
result in increased adoption or continued use of our technologies. In some cases, we may be
required to consolidate or record our share of the earnings or losses of companies in which we have
acquired ownership interests. Our share of any losses will adversely affect our financial results
until we exit from or reduce our exposure to these investments.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of business acquisitions depends in part upon our ability
to integrate the acquired businesses in an efficient and effective manner. The integration of
companies that have previously operated independently may result in significant challenges, and we
may be unable to accomplish the integration smoothly or successfully. The difficulties of
integrating companies include, among others: retaining key employees; maintaining important
relationships of Qualcomm and the acquired business; minimizing the diversion of managements
attention from ongoing business matters; coordinating geographically separate organizations;
consolidating research and development operations; and consolidating corporate and administrative
infrastructures.
We cannot assure you that the integration of acquired businesses with our business will result
in the realization of the full benefits anticipated by us to result from the acquisitions. We may
not derive any commercial value from
34
acquired technology, products and intellectual property or from future technologies and
products based on the acquired technology and/or intellectual property, and we may be subject to
liabilities that are not covered by indemnification protection we may obtain.
Defects or errors in our products and services or in the products of our customers could harm our
business. If we experience product liability claims or recalls, we may incur significant expenses
and experience decreased demand for our products.
Our products are inherently complex and may contain defects and errors that are detected only
when the products are in use. For example, as our chipset product complexities increase, we are
required to migrate to integrated circuit technologies with smaller geometric feature sizes. The
design process interface issues are more complex as we enter into these new domains of technology,
which adds risk to yields and reliability. Because our products and services are responsible for
critical functions in our customers products and/or networks, such defects or errors could have an
adverse impact on our customers, which could damage our reputation, harm our customer relationships
and expose us to liability. Defects or impurities in our components, materials or software or those
used by our customers or licensees, equipment failures or other difficulties could adversely affect
our ability, and that of our customers and licensees, to ship products on a timely basis, customer
or licensee demand for our products or the commitment of financial and/or engineering resources
that could reduce operating margins and affect future product release schedules. Additionally, a
defect or failure, including those related to security vulnerabilities, in our products or the
products of our customers or licensees could lead to liability claims, harm our reputation and/or
adversely affect the growth of 3G and 3G/4G multimode wireless markets.
Manufacturing, testing, marketing and use of our products and those of our licensees and
customers entail the risk of product liability. The use of wireless devices containing our products
to access untrusted content creates a risk of exposing the system software in those devices to
viral or malicious attacks. We continue to expand our focus on this issue and take measures to
safeguard the software from this threat. However, this issue carries the risk of general product
liability claims along with the associated impacts on reputation and demand. In addition, a product
liability claim or recall, whether against our licensees, customers or us, could harm our
reputation and result in decreased demand for our products.
Our Firethorn business does not currently generate operating income and may not succeed or its
operating results may not meet our expectations.
If our Firethorn business does not succeed, our investment in its technology may not provide
us an adequate return, and our business could be harmed. Consumer acceptance of our Firethorn
service offerings will continue to be affected by competition, technology-based differences and by
the operational performance, quality and reliability of our services platforms. Our Firethorn
business had $184 million in assets (including $154 million in goodwill) at December 26, 2010. If
we do not expect to achieve adequate market penetration with our mobile commerce products, our
assets may become impaired, which could negatively affect our operating results.
Our QMT divisions business does not currently generate operating income and may not succeed or its
operating results may not meet our expectations.
While we continue to believe our QMT divisions IMOD displays will offer compelling advantages
to users of displays, there can be no assurance that our IMOD product development efforts will be
successful, that we will be able to cost-effectively manufacture these new products, that we will
be able to successfully market these products or that other technologies will not continue to
improve in ways that reduce the advantages we anticipate from our IMOD displays. Sales of flat
panel displays are currently dominated, and we believe will likely continue to be dominated for
some time, by displays based on liquid crystal display (LCD) technology. Numerous companies are
making substantial investments in, and conducting research to improve characteristics of, LCDs.
Additionally, several other flat panel display technologies have been, or are being, developed,
including technologies for the production of organic light-emitting diode (OLED), field emission,
inorganic electroluminescence, gas plasma and vacuum fluorescent displays. In each case, advances
in LCD or other flat panel display technologies could result in technologies that are more cost
effective, have fewer display limitations or can be brought to market faster than our IMOD
technology. These advances in competing technologies might cause device manufacturers to avoid
entering into commercial relationships with us or to not renew planned or existing relationships
with us. Our QMT division had $379 million in assets (including $128 million in goodwill) at
December 26, 2010. If we do not expect to achieve adequate market penetration with our IMOD display
technology, our assets may become impaired, which could negatively impact our operating results.
35
Potential tax liabilities could adversely affect our results.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe
that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related
litigation could materially differ from amounts reflected in historical income tax provisions and
accruals. In such case, our income tax provision and net income in the period or periods in which
that determination is made could be negatively affected. In addition, tax rules may change that may
adversely affect our future reported financial results or the way we conduct our business. For
example, we consider the operating earnings of certain non-United States subsidiaries to be
indefinitely invested outside the United States based on estimates that future domestic cash
generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs. No provision has been made for
United States federal and state or foreign taxes that may result from future remittances of
undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. Our future financial results and liquidity may
be adversely affected if accounting rules regarding unrepatriated earnings change, if domestic cash
needs require us to repatriate foreign earnings, or if the United States international tax rules
change as part of comprehensive tax reform or other tax legislation.
If wireless devices pose safety risks, we may be subject to new regulations, and demand for our
products and those of our licensees and customers may decrease.
Concerns over the effects of radio frequency emissions may have the effect of discouraging the
use of wireless devices, which may decrease demand for our products and those of our licensees and
customers. Interest groups have requested that the FCC investigate claims that wireless
communications technologies pose health concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids
and medical devices. Concerns have also been expressed over the possibility of safety risks due to
a lack of attention associated with the use of wireless devices while driving. Any legislation that
may be adopted in response to these concerns could reduce demand for our products and those of our
licensees and customers in the United States as well as foreign countries.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a
Disaster Recovery Plan for our internal information technology networking systems, our systems are
vulnerable to damages from computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts and
telecommunication failures, among other factors. Any system failure, accident or security breach
that causes interruptions in our operations, or in our vendors, customers or licensees
operations, could result in a material disruption to our business. To the extent that any
disruption or security breach results in a loss or damage to our customers data or applications,
or inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. In
addition, we may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions or
security breaches.
From time to time, we install new or upgraded business management systems. To the extent such
systems fail or are not properly implemented, we may experience material disruptions to our
business, delays in our external financial reporting or failures in our system of internal
controls, that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are subject to government regulation pertaining to environmental and safety laws, to our
industry, products and services, to corporate governance and public disclosure and to health care.
National, state and local environmental laws and regulations affect our operations around the
world. These laws may make it more expensive to manufacture, have manufactured and sell products.
It may also be difficult to comply with laws and regulations in a timely manner, and we may not
have compliant products available in the quantities requested by our customers, which may have an
adverse impact on our results of operations. There is also the potential for higher costs driven by
climate change regulations. Our costs could increase if our vendors (e.g., third-party
manufacturers or utility companies) pass on their costs to us.
As part of the development and commercialization of our IMOD display technology, we are
operating both a development and a production fabrication facility. The development and
commercialization of IMOD display prototypes is a complex and precise process involving restricted
materials subject to environmental and safety regulations. Our failure or inability to comply with
existing or future environmental and safety regulations could result in significant remediation
liabilities, the imposition of fines and/or the suspension or termination of development and
production activities.
Our products and services, and those of our customers and licensees, are subject to various
regulations, including FCC regulations in the United States and other international regulations, as
well as the specifications of national,
36
regional and international standards bodies. The adoption of new laws or regulations, changes
in the regulation of our activities, or exclusion or limitation of our technology or products by a
government or standards body, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including,
among other factors, changes in laws, policies, practices or enforcement affecting trade, foreign
investments, licensing practices, spectrum license issuance, adoption of standards, the provision
of wireless device subsidies by wireless operators to their customers, taxation, environmental
protection, loans and employment.
We hold licenses to use spectrum in the United States and the United Kingdom, and we expect
that licenses to use the BWA spectrum won in the auction in India will be assigned to us in the
first half of calendar 2011. All of these licenses are subject to a variety of ongoing regulatory
proceedings in these respective countries. Additionally, certain of our licenses in the United
States are subject to minimum build-out requirements to be met at various dates beginning in June
2013. On December 20, 2010, we announced that we have agreed to sell substantially all of our
licenses in the United States, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions,
including approval by the FCC and clearance from the U.S. Department of Justice. If we do not
receive approval to sell these licenses pursuant to this agreement, there is no assurance that we
would be able to obtain a comparable price from another party or that we would be able to meet the
applicable build-out requirements for those licenses. The BWA spectrum licenses will be subject to
minimum build-out requirements to be met within five years of the effective date of the license. If
we do not meet these requirements, the relevant government authorities could impose a fine or could
rescind the license in the area(s) in which the build-out requirements are not met. Changes in the
allocation of available spectrum by the countries in which we hold licenses could have a material
adverse risk on our business and the value of our assets.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance, public disclosure
and health care may create uncertainty regarding compliance matters. New or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases. As a result, their
application in practice may evolve over time. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure and complying with laws and regulations. Evolving
interpretations of new or changed legal requirements may cause us to incur higher costs as we
revise current practices, policies, procedures, and/or health plans and may divert management time
and attention to compliance activities. Our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations
and standards may fail, particularly if there is ambiguity as to how such new or changed laws,
regulations and standards should be applied in practice. Further, our board members, chief
executive officer and chief financial officer could face an increased risk of personal liability in
connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and
retaining qualified board members and executive officers, which could harm our business.
We may not be able to attract and retain qualified employees.
Our future success depends largely upon the continued service of our board members, executive
officers and other key management and technical personnel. Our success also depends on our ability
to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. In addition, implementing our
product and business strategy requires specialized engineering and other talent, and our revenues
are highly dependent on technological and product innovations. The market for such specialized
engineering and other talented employees in our industry is extremely competitive. In addition,
existing immigration laws make it more difficult for us to recruit and retain highly skilled
foreign national graduates of U.S. universities, making the pool of available talent even smaller.
Key employees represent a significant asset, and the competition for these employees is intense in
the wireless communications industry. We do not have employment agreements with our key management
personnel. In the event of a labor shortage, or in the event of an unfavorable change in prevailing
labor and/or immigration laws, we could experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified
employees. We continue to anticipate increases in human resource needs, particularly in
engineering. If we are unable to attract and retain the qualified employees that we need, our
business may be harmed.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial market risks related to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity
prices are described in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. At December 26, 2010, there have been
no other material changes to the market risks described at September 26, 2010 except as described
below. Additionally, we do not anticipate any other near-term changes in the nature of our market
risk exposures or in managements objectives and strategies with respect to managing such
exposures.
Interest Rate Risk. The following table provides information about our interest-bearing cash
and cash equivalents, marketable securities and loans payable that are sensitive to changes in
interest rates. The table presents
37
principal cash flows, weighted-average yield at cost and
contractual maturity dates. Additionally, we have assumed that the interest-bearing securities are
similar enough within the specified categories to aggregate the securities for presentation
purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Principal Amount by Expected Maturity
Average Interest Rates
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Single |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Maturity |
|
Total |
Fixed interest-bearing securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,984 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
4,899 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
1,263 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating interest-bearing securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
2,481 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Loans payable(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
Floating interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Denominated in Indian rupees. |
Cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value.
The loans payable approximate fair value.
Foreign Exchange Risk. We manage our exposure to foreign exchange market risks, when deemed
appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments, including foreign currency
forward and option contracts with financial counterparties. At December 26, 2010, we had a
liability of $2 million related to a foreign currency forward contract that was designated as a net
investment hedge of our investment in a wholly-owned subsidiary in Australia. We are subject to
market risk on such contract. If the exchange rates relevant to that contract were to change
unfavorably by 20%, we would incur a loss of $19 million.
At December 26, 2010, we had variable-rate long-term loans in the aggregate of $1.1 billion,
which are payable in full in Indian rupees in December 2012. The loans are payable in the
functional currency of our consolidated subsidiaries that are party to the loans, however, we are
subject to foreign currency translation risk, which may impact our liability for principal
repayment and interest expense that we will record in the future. If the foreign currency exchange
rate were to change unfavorably by 20%, we would incur additional principal and interest expense of
$272 million and $50 million, respectively, through the remainder of the contractual terms of the
loans.
Our analysis methods used to assess and mitigate the risks discussed above should not be
considered projections of future risks.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, we conducted an evaluation of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this evaluation, our
principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report.
38
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A review of our current litigation is disclosed in the notes to our condensed consolidated
financial statements. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8
Commitments and Contingencies. We are also engaged in other legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of our business and believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We have provided updated Risk Factors in the section labeled Risk Factors in Part I, Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. To reflect
the anticipated sale of certain 700 MHz spectrum related to our decision to shut down the FLO TV
business and network, we revised the risk factor entitled:
|
|
|
We are subject to government regulation pertaining to environmental and safety
laws, to our industry, products and services, to corporate governance and public
disclosure and to health care. |
Other than with respect to that revision, we do not believe the updates to the Risk Factors
have materially changed the type or magnitude of the risks we face in comparison to the disclosure
provided in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On March 1, 2010, we announced that we had been authorized to repurchase up to $3.0 billion of
our common stock with no expiration date. At December 26, 2010, approximately $1.7 billion remained
authorized for repurchase. While we did not repurchase any of our common stock during the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, we continue to evaluate repurchases under this program subject to capital
availability and periodic determinations that such repurchases are in the best interest of our
stockholders.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (1) |
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Designation. (2) |
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. (3) |
10.91
|
|
2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended. (4) |
10.92
|
|
Executive Retirement Matching Contribution Plan, as amended. (4) |
10.93
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 5, 2011, among QUALCOMM Incorporated, T
Merger Sub, Inc. and Atheros Communications, Inc. (5) |
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Paul E. Jacobs. |
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for William E. Keitel. |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Paul E. Jacobs. |
39
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for William E. Keitel. |
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. (6) |
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. (6) |
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. (6) |
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase. (6) |
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. (6) |
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. (6) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended
December 27, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30,
2005. |
|
(3) |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 25,
2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Indicates management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified pursuant
to Item 15(a). |
|
(5) |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011. |
|
(6) |
|
Furnished, not filed. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUALCOMM Incorporated
|
|
|
/s/ William E. Keitel
|
|
|
William E. Keitel |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Dated: January 26, 2011
41