MOVADO GROUP, INC.
650 From Road, Ste. 375
Paramus, New Jersey 07652-3556

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

June 19, 2008

We will hold the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Movado Group, Inc. on Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., at the Company’s New York office and showrooms located at 25 West 39^th Street, 15^th Floor, New York, NY 10018 for the following purposes:

	1.		To elect nine directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified.
	2.		To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009.
	3.		To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Holders of the Company’s Common Stock and Class A Common Stock of record at the close of business on April 21, 2008 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any postponements or adjournments thereof.

This year, new Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow us to furnish proxy materials to our shareholders via the Internet. We are pleased to take advantage of these new rules and believe that this new e-proxy process will expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials while lowering the cost of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.

Accordingly, we are mailing to our shareholders of record and beneficial owners a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which provides instructions on how to access the attached proxy statement and our annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 via the Internet and how to vote online. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how to obtain the proxy materials in printed form.

Dated: May 5, 2008		By order of the Board of Directors
		Timothy F. Michno
		Secretary and General Counsel

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

     Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please follow the instructions you received to vote your shares as soon as possible, to ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record, or beneficial shareholders named as proxies by their shareholders of record, who attend the meeting may vote their shares personally, even though they have sent in proxies or voted online.

     Help us make a difference by eliminating paper proxy mailings to your home or business: with your consent, we will provide all future proxy voting materials and annual reports to you electronically. Instructions for consenting to electronic delivery can be found on your proxy card. Your consent to receive shareholder materials electronically will remain in effect until canceled.

MOVADO GROUP, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Movado Group, Inc. to be held Thursday, June 19, 2008

Some Questions You May Have Regarding This Proxy Statement

What is the purpose of these materials?

          The Board of Directors of Movado Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is soliciting proxies for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. at the Company’s New York office and showrooms located at 25 West 39^th Street, 15^th Floor, New York, NY 10018. The information included in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of Directors and our most highly paid executive officers, and other required information. Our annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 is available to review with this proxy statement. We are mailing a notice of the Annual Meeting (and, for those who request it, a paper copy of this proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy) to our shareholders on or about May 7, 2008.

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

          The two matters scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting are:

	1.		The election of nine directors to serve on the Board; and
	2.		The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009.

          In addition, such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof may be voted on.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

          Anyone owning shares of the Company’s Common Stock and/or its Class A Common Stock on April 21, 2008, the record date for this year’s Annual Meeting, is entitled to attend and to vote on all items properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

Who is asking me for my vote?

          The Company is soliciting your proxy on behalf of the Board and has retained Broadridge Investor Communications Solutions, Inc., professional proxy solicitors, to assist with the solicitation. We will pay the entire cost of this proxy solicitation, including Broadridge’s fee, which we expect to be approximately $13,500.

What are my voting rights?

          Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote and each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to 10 votes on each matter properly presented at the Annual Meeting. On April 21, 2008, there were 18,505,747 shares of Common Stock outstanding and 6,634,319 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding. A list of all shareholders as of the record date will be available during ordinary business hours at the Company’s principal place of business located at 650 From Road, Ste. 375, Paramus, NJ 07652-3556, from the Secretary of the Company, at least 10 days before the Annual Meeting and will also be available at the Annual Meeting.

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

          The Board recommends that you vote:

1.

FOR the election of each of the director nominees; and

2.

FOR the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full printed set?

          As outlined in the new rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company has elected to provide access to its proxy materials via the Internet. Accordingly, the Company is mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to shareholders of record and beneficial owners. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet or to request a printed set may be found on the Notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

Where can I view the proxy materials on the Internet?

          The Notice provides you with instructions on how to:

	•		view proxy materials for the Annual Meeting via the Internet; and
	•		instruct the Company to send future proxy materials to you by email.

You can view the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting online at www.movadogroup.com by clicking on Investor Center and then Annual Report & Proxy Materials.

How do I vote?

          If you are a shareholder on the record date, you may vote by following the instructions for voting on the Notice. If you receive paper copies of these proxy materials, you can vote by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed envelope. Alternatively, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person. If you vote online, by phone or mail in a proxy card, you may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person but in that case, only your in-person votes will count. If you wish to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting and they are held by your broker in “street name,” you must bring a letter from the broker to the Annual Meeting showing that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on April 21, 2008.

Can I change my vote after I have delivered my proxy?

          Yes. You may change your vote at any time before voting concludes at the Annual Meeting by:

	•		providing another proxy, using any of the available methods for voting, with a later date;
	•		notifying the Company’s Secretary in writing before the Annual Meeting that you wish to revoke your proxy; or
	•		voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

What is a quorum?

          For the purposes of the Annual Meeting, a “quorum” is a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock owned by shareholders on the record date who are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. There must be a quorum for the Annual Meeting to be held.

What is broker “discretionary” voting?

          Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), if you hold your shares through a broker, your broker is permitted to vote your shares on the election of directors and the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm in its discretion if it has transmitted the proxy materials to you and has not received voting instructions from you on how to vote your shares before the deadline set by your broker.

How are matters presented at the Annual Meeting approved?

          Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. The approval of the proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for fiscal 2009 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast in accordance with New York law. For this reason, abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors or the ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent public accounting firm for fiscal 2009.

May I vote confidentially?

          Yes. Our policy is to keep your vote confidential, except as otherwise legally required, to allow for the tabulation and certification of votes and to facilitate proxy solicitation.

Who will count the votes?

          A representative of Broadridge will count the votes and act as the inspector of election for the Annual Meeting.

What if additional matters are presented to the Annual Meeting?

          We do not know of any business to be considered at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals described in this proxy statement. If any other business is presented at the Annual Meeting, your properly executed proxy gives authority to each of Timothy F. Michno, our General Counsel and corporate Secretary, and to Tasha Cooper Coleman, our Assistant General Counsel, to vote on such matters at his or her discretion.

Where can I find the voting results from the Annual Meeting?

          We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and will publish final results in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

How can I obtain information about the Company?

          A copy of our fiscal 2008 Annual Report is available on our website at www.movadogroup.com. Shareholders may also obtain a free copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K by visiting our website or by sending a request in writing to Suzanne Rosenberg, Vice President of Corporate Communications at the Company’s address set forth in the Notice.

When are shareholder proposals due for consideration at next year’s annual meeting?

          Under the SEC rules, for shareholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting, they must be submitted in writing to our corporate Secretary, Movado Group, Inc., 650 From Road, Ste. 375, Paramus, NJ 07652-3556 on or before January 7, 2009. In addition, our bylaws provide that for directors to be nominated or other proposals to be properly presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting, an additional notice of any nomination or proposal must be received by us not less than 60 nor more than 90 days before the Annual Meeting. If less than 70 days’ notice of our 2009 Annual Meeting is given, then to be timely, the notice by the shareholder must be received by us not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the 2009 Annual Meeting was made or the notice of the meeting was mailed, whichever occurs first.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

          The following table shows the number of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and the Common Stock beneficially owned as of April 21, 2008 (except as otherwise noted in footnotes 3 and 9) by (i) each shareholder who is known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of either the Class A Common Stock or the Common Stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group.

										Percent of Outstanding
										Shares of Capital Stock
		Shares of
		Class A				Shares of
		Common				Common												Percent of
		Stock				Stock				Class A								Total
		Beneficially				Beneficially				Common				Common				Voting
Name of Beneficial Owner		Owned (1)				Owned (1)				Stock (1)				Stock (1)				Power (1)
Margaret Hayes Adame (2)			—				21,250				—				*				*
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (3)			—				1,136,459				—				6.1	%			1.3	%
Richard J. Coté (4)			—				1,242,380				—				6.7	%			1.5	%
Alexander Grinberg (5)			3,990,806				3,134				60.2	%			*				47.0	%
Efraim Grinberg (6)			5,333,874				1,012,789				80.4	%			5.5	%			64.1	%
Gedalio Grinberg (7)			437,670				21,450				6.6	%			*				5.2	%
Alan H. Howard (2)			—				19,374				—				*				*
Richard Isserman (2)			—				4,750				—				*				*
Eugene J. Karpovich (8)			—				41,640				—				*				*
Keeley Asset Management Corp. (9)			—				1,420,000				—				7.7	%			1.7	%
Nathan Leventhal (2)			—				5,500				—				*				*
Timothy F. Michno			—				842				—				*				*
Donald Oresman (2)			3,920				17,500				*				*				*
Miriam Phalen (10)			3,995,330				—				60.2	%			—				47.1	%
Leonard L. Silverstein (2)(11)			—				110,146				—				*				*
All executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons) (12)			6,450,320				2,500,755				97.2	%			13.5	%			79.0	%

The address for Messrs. Coté, A. Grinberg, E. Grinberg, G. Grinberg, Howard, Isserman, Karpovich, Leventhal, Michno, Oresman and Silverstein and Ms. Hayes Adame and Ms. Phalen is c/o Movado Group, Inc., 650 From Road, Ste. 375, Paramus, New Jersey 07652-3556.

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

          Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until the election and qualification of their successors. Under the Company’s by-laws, the Board of Directors can change the number of directors comprising the entire Board so long as the number is not less than three. The Board currently consists of nine directors. All of the nominees are members of the present Board of Directors. If any nominee for election to the Board of Directors should be unable to accept nomination or election as a director, which is not expected, your proxy may be voted for a substitute or substitutes designated by the Board of Directors or the number of directors constituting the Board may be reduced in accordance with the Company’s by-laws. Directors will be elected by the holders of a plurality of the voting power present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will not be counted for purposes of the election of directors. The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of the nominees listed below.

						Director
Name		Age				Since				Position
Margaret Hayes Adame			68				1993			Director
Richard J. Coté			53				2000			Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Director
Efraim Grinberg			50				1988			President and Chief Executive Officer; Director
Gedalio Grinberg			76				1967			Chairman of the Board of Directors
Alan H. Howard			48				1997			Director
Richard Isserman			73				2005			Director
Nathan Leventhal			65				2003			Director
Donald Oresman			82				1981			Director
Leonard L. Silverstein			86				1975			Director

          There are no family relationships between any of the Company’s directors, except for Efraim Grinberg who is the son of Gedalio Grinberg. There are no arrangements between any director and any other person pursuant to which any of them was elected a director.

          Ms. Hayes Adame is the President of Fashion Group International, Inc., a non-profit organization working with the fashion industry, which she joined in March 1993. From 1981 to March 1993, Ms. Hayes Adame was a Senior Vice President and general merchandise manager at Saks Fifth Avenue, a major retailer. She is also a member of the board of directors of International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.

          Mr. Coté joined the Company in January 2000 as Executive Vice President — Finance and Administration. In May 2001, Mr. Coté was promoted to Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Coté worked for Colgate-Palmolive, a consumer goods company, where, from 1998 to 2000, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for U.S. operations, and from 1993 to 1998, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Asia/Pacific operations.

          Mr. E. Grinberg joined the Company in June 1980 and served as the Company’s Vice President of Marketing from February 1985 until July 1986, at which time he was elected to the position of Senior Vice President of Marketing. From June 1990 to October 1995, Mr. E. Grinberg served as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer and since October 1995 served as the Company’s President. In May 2001, Mr. E. Grinberg was elected to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. E. Grinberg also serves on the board of directors of Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc., the American Watch Association and the Jeweler’s Fund for Children.

          Mr. G. Grinberg founded the Company’s predecessor in 1961 and the Company in 1967. He has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since then. Mr. G. Grinberg served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer until May 2001.

          Mr. Howard is the Managing Partner of Heathcote Advisors LLC, which he formed in March 2008. Previously, from July 2006 until July 2007, he was a Managing Director of Greenbriar Equity Group, LLC, a private equity firm which focuses on transportation and transportation related investments. Prior to July 2006, Mr. Howard was a Managing Director of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, an international provider of financial services. He had been with CSFB and its predecessor companies since 1986.

          Mr. Isserman was appointed to the Board in June 2005. In his nearly 40 year career with KPMG LLP, Mr. Isserman served as Audit Partner in KPMG’s New York office for 26 years. He also led KPMG’s real estate audit practice in New York and was a member of the firm’s SEC Reviewing Partner’s Committee. Mr. Isserman retired from KPMG in June 1995. A licensed New York state CPA, Mr. Isserman also serves as the chairman of the corporate compliance committee and a member of the audit committee for Federation Employment and Guidance Services, a social service agency in New York City.

          Mr. Leventhal served as Chief of Staff to Mayor John Lindsay, Deputy Mayor to Mayor Ed Koch, and Transition Chairman for both Mayors David Dinkins and Michael Bloomberg. He currently chairs Mayor

Bloomberg’s Committee on Appointments and is a Commissioner on the New York City Planning Commission. In the not-for-profit sector, Mr. Leventhal served for 17 years as President of Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, where he is now President Emeritus and Chairman of the Avery Fisher Artist Program. He currently serves on the boards of a number of equity and fixed income mutual funds managed by the Dreyfus Corporation, an investment advisor. Mr. Leventhal is a former partner of the law firm Poletti Freidin Prashker Feldman & Gartner.

          Mr. Oresman was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Paramount Communications, Inc., a publishing and entertainment company, from December 1983 until his retirement in March 1994. Prior to December 1983, Mr. Oresman was engaged in the practice of law as a partner of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, where he is now Of Counsel.

          Mr. Silverstein has been engaged in the practice of law at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney (formerly Silverstein and Mullens), in Washington, D.C., for over 40 years. Mr. Silverstein also serves as Vice President and Director of Tax Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of BNA, Inc., and a director of Chevy Chase FSB. He is an officer of the French Legion of Honor, a former Vice Chairman and currently an active honorary trustee of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Past President of the Alliance Francaise of Washington, formerly President and currently a director of the National Symphony Orchestra Association, Treasurer of the Madison Council of the Library of Congress and President, French-American Cultural Foundation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

          Board Meetings and Committees

          In fiscal 2008, the Board of Directors held seven meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served.

          The Board of Directors has three committees:

	•		Audit
	•		Compensation
	•		Nominating/Corporate Governance.

          The members of the committees and their chairs are appointed by the Board annually. Each committee is comprised entirely of independent directors in accordance with NYSE listing standards. Each committee operates under a written charter which is available at the Company’s website at www.movadogroup.com by clicking on “Investor Center”, “Corporate Governance”, “Committee Composition” and then the name of the respective committee. Committee charters are also available in print upon the written request of any shareholder. The current committee membership is as follows:

Audit		Compensation		Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee		Committee		Committee
Richard Isserman *		Alan H. Howard *		Nathan Leventhal *
Alan H. Howard		Margaret Hayes Adame		Margaret Hayes Adame
Donald Oresman		Donald Oresman		Leonard L. Silverstein
		Leonard L. Silverstein

          Audit Committee

          The Board of Directors believes that each member of the Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under the rules adopted by the SEC and, therefore, has accounting or related financial expertise in accordance with the NYSE listing standards. The Audit Committee held four meetings in fiscal 2008.

          The principal functions of the Audit Committee are to (i) appoint, approve the compensation of, terminate and oversee the work of the Company’s independent auditors; (ii) approve in advance all audit and permissible non-audit services provided to the Company by independent auditors; (iii) review, in consultation with the Company’s independent auditors, management and the Company’s internal auditors, the Company’s financial reporting process, including its internal controls; (iv) review with management and the Company’s independent auditors, the Company’s annual and quarterly financial statements before the same are publicly filed, and (v) report regularly to the Board with respect to any issues that arise concerning, among other things, the quality or integrity of the

Company’s financial statements, the performance of the internal audit function, the Company’s compliance with legal requirements and the performance and independence of the Company’s independent auditors.

          Compensation Committee

          The Compensation Committee held six meetings in fiscal 2008. The principal functions of the Compensation Committee are to (i) review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation, evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and set the CEO’s compensation level based on that evaluation; (ii) review and approve compensation levels for executive non-CEO officers and key employees of the Company; (iii) review significant employee benefit programs and (iv) establish and administer executive compensation programs, including bonus plans, stock option and other equity-based programs, deferred compensation plans and any other cash or stock incentive programs.

          For additional information concerning the operation of the Compensation Committee, including the role of outside compensation consultants and management in the process of determining the amount and form of executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

          Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

          The Company’s Compensation Committee was at all times during fiscal year 2008 comprised entirely of independent directors who at no time were executive officers or employees of the Company. Mr. Silverstein, a member of the committee, is a partner at the law firm of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C. That firm rendered legal services to the Company during fiscal 2008 for which it was paid $31,455. The Board of Directors determined that such relationship was immaterial. No executive officer of the Company has ever served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any company whose executive officers include a member of the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee.

          Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee

          The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings in fiscal 2008. The principal functions of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are to (i) identify individuals qualified to become directors, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommend director candidates to the Board of Directors; (ii) develop and recommend corporate governance principles to the Board of Directors; (iii) oversee the adoption of a code of ethics for directors, officers and employees of the Company and assure that procedures are in place for disclosure of any waivers of that code for directors or executive officers; and (iv) facilitate an annual assessment of the performance of the Board and each of its committees.

          Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for the Board

          In considering possible candidates to serve on the Board of Directors, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will take into account all appropriate qualifications, qualities and skills in the context of the current make-up of the Board and will consider the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. In addition, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate each nominee according to the following criteria: personal character, accomplishments, integrity, and reputation in the business community; knowledge of the industry in which the Company does business; sound business judgment; leadership ability and capacity for strategic thinking; experience working constructively with others; sufficient time to devote to Board matters; diversity of viewpoints and backgrounds and the absence of any conflict of interest that might interfere with performance as a director.

          Shareholders may recommend director candidates for consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. To have a candidate considered by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must include the following information:

•

The name and address of the shareholder and evidence of the shareholder’s ownership of Company stock, including the number and class of shares owned and the length of time of ownership;

	•		A description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each candidate pursuant to which the nomination is being made;
	•		The name of the candidate, the candidate’s resume or a listing of his or her qualifications to be a director of the Company and the person’s consent to be named as a director if nominated by the Board of Directors; and
	•		Such other information regarding each proposed candidate as would be required to be included in a proxy statement under the rules of the SEC if such candidate had been nominated by the Board of Directors.

          Each such recommendation must be sent to the Secretary of the Company at Movado Group, Inc., 650 From Road, Ste. 375, Paramus, New Jersey 07652-3556 and must be received within the time indicted above on page 3 under “When are shareholder proposals due for consideration at next year’s annual meeting?”. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate shareholder recommended director candidates in the same manner as it evaluates director candidates identified by other means.

          Corporate Governance Guidelines

          The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on the Company’s website at www.movadogroup.com by clicking on “Investor Center” and then “Corporate Governance”. The Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are also available in print upon the written request of any shareholder.

          Director Independence

          The listing standards of the NYSE require that a majority of the Board of Directors be independent. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company (directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). The Board of Directors broadly considers all relevant facts and circumstances relative to independence and considers the issue not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from the viewpoint of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. Material relationships can include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships (among others). In accordance with the NYSE listing standards, the Board has adopted categorical standards of director independence that provide that none of the following relationships will be considered a material relationship that would impair a director’s independence:

	•		A director who is a director, an executive officer or an employee, or whose immediate family member is a director, an executive officer or an employee, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for goods or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, is less than the greater of $1,000,000 and 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues; or
	•		A director who serves, or whose immediate family member serves, as an executive, officer, director, trustee or employee of a charitable organization and the Company’s discretionary charitable contributions to the organization are less than the greater of $1,000,000 and 2% of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues.

          The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Board of Directors, with the exception of those three members who are employees of the Company (namely Messrs. E. Grinberg, G. Grinberg and R. Coté), representing a majority of the entire Board, are independent under the NYSE listing standards and satisfy the Company’s categorical standards set forth above.

          In addition, in accordance with the NYSE listing standards, the Board of Directors has determined that the Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are composed entirely of independent directors. The Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the applicable rules of the SEC and under the NYSE listing standards.

          Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

          The non-management directors hold regular executive sessions without management at least once each quarter. The chairman of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is designated to chair these executive sessions under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

          Communications with the Board of Directors

          Shareholders and other interested parties desiring to communicate directly with the full Board of Directors, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the non-management directors as a group or with any individual director or directors may do so by sending such communication in writing addressed to the attention of the intended recipient(s), c/o Secretary and General Counsel, Movado Group, Inc., 650 From Road, Ste. 375, Paramus, NJ 07652-3556. Interested parties may communicate anonymously and/or confidentially if they desire. All communications received that relate to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to the chairman of the Audit Committee unless the communication is otherwise addressed. All other communications received will be forwarded to the appropriate director or directors.

          Director Attendance at Annual Meeting

          The Company encourages all of the directors to attend each annual meeting of shareholders. To the extent reasonably practicable, the Company regularly schedules a meeting of the Board of Directors on the same day as the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All members of the Board of Directors, except for Mr. G. Grinberg, attended the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     For detailed information concerning Richard Coté, Gedalio Grinberg and Efraim Grinberg, see the listing for each under the heading “Election of Directors” above. The names of the other executive officers of the Company (and their respective ages as of the date of this proxy statement) are set forth below, together with the positions held by each during the past five years.

Name		Age				Position
John C. Burns			46			Vice President and Treasurer
Sallie A. DeMarsilis			43			Chief Financial Officer; Principal Accounting Officer
Eugene J. Karpovich			61			Senior Vice President
Timothy F. Michno			51			Secretary and General Counsel

          Mr. Burns joined the Company as Vice President and Treasurer in November 2007. He served as Assistant Treasurer at D&B Corporation, a publicly traded business information company, from 2005 to 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Burns held several senior treasury positions with Formica Corporation, a company engaged in the design and manufacture of surfacing materials, from 1998 through 2004, including Vice President and Treasurer. Before joining Formica Corporation, Mr. Burns worked for twelve years at Leucadia National Corporation, a publicly listed investment holding company, after working for several years in banking at Manufacturer’s Hanover Trust (now JP Morgan Chase).

          Ms. DeMarsilis who was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer effective March 31, 2008, joined the Company in January 2008 as a Senior Vice President of Finance. From December 2004 through December 2007, she served as Senior Vice President of Finance with The Warnaco Group, Inc., a publicly traded global wholesaler and retailer of apparel. Prior to that, Ms. DeMarsilis held several senior financial positions with AnnTaylor Stores Corporation from November 1994 through December 2004, including Controller and Senior Vice President of Finance. AnnTaylor Stores Corporation is a publicly traded specialty retailer in the United States of women’s apparel, shoes and accessories. Ms. DeMarsilis is a certified public accountant and worked in public accounting with Deloitte & Touche LLP for eight years before joining AnnTaylor Stores Corporation.

          Mr. Karpovich began with the Company in 1998 as Chief Financial Officer for the Movado brand. From 2000 to 2001, he was Vice President, Financial Planning for the Company. He was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in October 2001 and, in February 2007, assumed the additional position of Principal Accounting Officer. Effective March 31, 2008, Mr. Karpovich resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer to focus on various corporate worldwide initiatives. Before joining the Company, Mr. Karpovich had been the Chief Financial Officer of the watch company Wittnauer International, Inc., a subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Inc., where he was employed for 23 years.

          Mr. Michno joined the Company in April 1992 and since then has served as its Secretary and General Counsel. He has been engaged in the practice of law since 1983. Immediately prior to joining the Company and since 1986, he was an associate at the New York firm of Chadbourne & Parke. From 1988 to 1991, he served as a resident outside counsel to Fortune Brands, Inc. (formerly known as American Brands, Inc.), a consumer products company.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Role of the Compensation Committee

          The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (for purposes of this analysis, the “Committee”) is responsible for reviewing and approving annually corporate goals relative to the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), evaluating the performance of the CEO against those goals and determining the CEO’s compensation based on that evaluation. In addition, the Committee also reviews and approves the structure and levels of compensation for the Company’s other executive officers and senior management; reviews and approves significant compensation programs generally, including performance goals under annual and long-term incentive plans; and reviews and administers the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan which, as amended and restated, was approved by the shareholders in 2004. Throughout this proxy statement, the individuals who served as the Company’s CEO or Chief Financial Officer during fiscal 2008, as well as the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 19, are referred to as the “named executive officers”.

Compensation Objectives

          The fundamental purpose served by every compensation decision made by the Company and approved by the Committee is to attract, retain, motivate and appropriately reward a group of highly qualified individuals who are expected to contribute to the Company’s continued success, with the ultimate objective of enhancing shareholder value. This is the underlying rationale for all of the Company’s compensation arrangements and is evident in its compensation programs that were in effect during fiscal year 2008. The three most significant elements of compensation used by the Company in fashioning specific compensation packages offered to its executives and management level employees generally are: (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive cash bonuses and (3) long term equity participation. Of these, the variable elements — incentive cash bonuses and equity compensation - are performance-based and, as such, most closely link executives’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders by rewarding performance meeting or exceeding the established goals. The Company and the Committee believe that the most effective executive compensation programs are those designed to reward the achievement of specific annual and long-term strategic goals set by the Company and therefore a significant portion of the total compensation that may be earned by the named executive officers is determined by these variable elements.

Setting Executive Compensation

          With the foregoing objectives in mind, the Company targets overall compensation levels for the named executive officers and senior management between the median and the 75^th percentile for similar positions. Exceptions to this may occur as dictated by Company performance, the experience level and performance of the individual and market factors. For example, for certain positions that are particularly important for the Company’s ability to achieve its strategic goals and for which the competition for experienced, highly successful executives is especially acute, the Committee targets compensation as high as the 75^th percentile.

          To assist it in assessing the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs, the Committee periodically engages the services of independent executive compensation and benefits consulting firms. In connection with its review of compensation for fiscal 2007, the Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) to evaluate the Company’s compensation programs for the named executive officers and to analyze the Company’s long-term equity incentive plans generally. FW Cook did not receive professional fees from

the Company in fiscal 2007 other than in connection with advising the Committee on executive compensation matters.

          As part of its analysis, FW Cook compared base salary levels, annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards paid by the Company to the named executive officers in fiscal 2005 and 2006 to data available from the following peer group of publicly-traded consumer products companies which are similar in size to the Company in terms of revenue, total employees and market capitalization:

°   Finlay Enterprises, Inc.		°   Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.		°   Steven Madden, Ltd.
°   Fossil, Inc.		°   K-Swiss, Inc.		°   Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc.
°   Guess?, Inc.		°   Oakley, Inc.
°   Hartmarx Corp.		°   Perry Ellis International, Inc.

          The Committee periodically reviews and updates the relevant peer group of companies against which it believes the Company competes for talent. The Committee also recognizes that the Company competes with these and many other, larger companies for top executive-level talent.

          Consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy, a significant percentage of total compensation, particularly in the case of the named executive officers, is allocated to variable incentive compensation. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews all information made available from FW Cook and the Company’s Senior Vice President of Human Resources to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation. In approving compensation for the CEO and the other named executive officers for fiscal 2008, the Committee considered the results of the FW Cook analysis from the prior year, projected increases in United States executive base salary levels based on published data obtained from Hewitt Associates, the Institute of Management and Administration and data provided by and the recommendations of the Company’s Senior Vice President of Human Resources.

          The Committee makes all compensation decisions in respect of the compensation awarded to the CEO. With respect to the compensation of the other named executive officers and other senior executives, the Committee considers the recommendations of the CEO and the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), including recommendations regarding salary adjustments and annual award amounts. Subject to any applicable plan limitations, the Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to executives. The Committee also reviews total compensation earned by and awarded to the named executive officers for the prior three years.

Fiscal 2008 Executive Compensation Components

          For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, the principal components of compensation for the named executive officers were:

	•		base salary;
	•		performance-based annual cash compensation;
	•		long-term equity incentive compensation;
	•		retirement and other post-employment benefits; and
	•		perquisites and other personal benefits.

          Base Salary

          The Company provides named executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. Base salaries for named executive officers are determined by the Committee for each individual in light of the Committee’s assessment of the responsibilities relative to the position under consideration, as well as each individual’s background, training, experience and by reference to the competitive marketplace for comparable talent. Annual increases in base salary levels, if warranted, are reviewed with reference to the individual’s performance, the performance of the Company as a whole and the prevailing rate of increase in base salary levels generally in the competitive marketplace with respect to similar executive positions. During its review of base salaries for executives, the Committee primarily considers:

	•		market data with respect to average merit and cost of living increases for similar positions;
	•		internal review of the executive’s compensation, both individually and relative to other executive officers; and
	•		individual performance of the executive.

          For fiscal 2008, the Committee approved a recommendation by management not to increase the base salaries of the CEO, COO or the Chairman and to increase by 4.0% and 9.1%, respectively, the base salary levels for Mr. Michno and Mr. Karpovich. The larger than average percentage increase in Mr. Karpovich’s base salary for fiscal 2008 was approved by the Committee to bring it more closely into line with base salary levels paid to chief financial officers by the peer group of companies with which the Company competes for executive talent.

          Performance-Based Annual Cash Compensation

          The Company has two plans under which it provides its named executive officers, other executives and key management level employees annual performance-based opportunities for cash bonuses: the Movado Group, Inc. Executive Performance Plan (the “EPP”) in which only the named executive officers participate (with the exception of the Chairman, who does not participate in any cash incentive plan), and the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, in which the remaining bonus-eligible employees (except the named executive officers) participate. Both plans are designed to tie a significant portion of participants’ annual cash compensation to the Company’s annual financial performance.

          Under the EPP and consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 162(m)”), within 90 days after the beginning of each fiscal year the Committee establishes target and maximum cash incentive levels for the named executive officers that are expressed as a percentage of their respective base salaries. At the same time it sets cash incentive targets, the Committee also establishes an earnings per share objective that must be met before any cash incentive payments can be made under the EPP to any of the named executive officers.

          For fiscal 2008, the Committee set the target cash incentive payments for each of the CEO and COO at 75% of their respective base salaries and set the target payments for Mr. Karpovich and for Mr. Michno at 50% and 30% of their respective base salaries. In addition, the Committee established the maximum cash incentives payable under the EPP to any of the named executive officers at 150% of their target cash incentive amounts. The EPP provides that total cash incentives payable thereunder to all the named executive officers in any year may not exceed $5 million. Please see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for the target and maximum cash incentive awards payable to each of the named executive officers in respect of fiscal 2008.

          No cash incentives are paid to any of the named executive officers under the EPP unless the threshold earnings per share objective for the year, as determined by the Committee in or before each April, is achieved. For fiscal 2008, the earnings per share goal under the EPP was set at $1.20. If the Company achieves the earnings per share goal set by the Committee under the EPP, the Committee then assesses the Company’s overall financial performance and the named executive officers’ individual performance in exercising its discretion to determine the cash incentive actually paid to any of them under the EPP, which may not, in any event, exceed the maximum set at the beginning of the year.

          To assess corporate performance for the fiscal year, the Committee considers the extent to which the Company met the criteria for funding the bonus pool under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and the other criteria for measuring corporate performance that are established as financial targets under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan as part of the annual budgeting process and approved by the Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year.

          In fiscal 2008, the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan provided for 100% funding of the bonus pool if the Company achieved earnings per share (“EPS”) of $1.75 and return on capital employed (“ROCE”) of 13.0% for the year, adjusting as the Committee deems appropriate for unusual and non-recurring items. The calculation for ROCE is operating margin times asset turnover, where operating margin is operating income ÷ sales, and asset turnover is sales ÷ capital employed. As in the prior year, these two funding criteria were weighted 75% for EPS and 25% for ROCE and were aligned with the Company’s financial objectives for the fiscal year. If the EPS goal and the ROCE goal are both met, the bonus pool is 100% funded. If either goal is exceeded, bonus pool funding based on that exceeded goal is increased up to a maximum of 150% of target funding, as illustrated in the following table.

Goal
Achieved (%)		Pool Funding (%)
125		150
110		120
105		110
100		100

If either of these two funding goals is not met, the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan provides that any funding of the bonus pool based on that goal is within the discretion of the Committee.

          If the bonus pool is funded, the Committee considers the extent to which the other financial criteria under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan have been met in determining the cash incentive amount, if any, to pay to each named executive officer under the EPP. The Committee has the discretion to decrease or eliminate, but not to increase, the maximum cash incentive payable to each named executive officer under the EPP. In fiscal 2008, the Committee approved the following corporate performance criteria under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan:

	•		Net Sales;
	•		Operating Expenses;
	•		Gross Margin (%);
	•		Net Income;
	•		Operating Cash Flow; and
	•		Inventory and accounts receivable.

          The Committee approved these measures and the level at which each was set to ensure an appropriate focus on growth and profitability consistent with the Company’s strategic plan. Each measure was set at a level requiring the successful execution of a number of initiatives to increase efficiency, reduce costs and continue to grow sales in the Company’s brands and business units. The relationship to prior year actual results varied by individual financial target. All targets, except for operating cash flow, were set at levels representing improvements from prior year results. The degree of improvement ranged from a 20 basis point improvement in gross margin percentage to a 17.1% improvement in net income. The operating cash flow target was set at $48.7 million which was equal to the net income target and a performance the Company and the Committee believed reflected the efficient management of the Company’s working capital.

          In fiscal 2008 the Company exceeded the earnings per share objective under the EPP but did not achieve the EPS and ROCE goals for full bonus pool funding under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. Therefore, funding of the bonus pool was discretionary on the part of the Committee. In determining whether to fund the bonus pool, and if so to what extent, the Committee considered management’s recommendation to partially fund the pool at a 60% level. The Committee considered specifically that, at that level of funding :

	•		the Company achieved over 95% of its net sales objective,
	•		operating expenses were within target;
	•		the Company exceeded its target for gross margin;
	•		the Company achieved over 96% of its net income target;
	•		operating cash flow target was exceeded; and
	•		the level of inventory and accounts receivable was better than targeted.

The Committee also took into account the fact that results for the year were adversely affected principally because of U.S. economic conditions in the fourth quarter. Based on this assessment, the Committee approved a discretionary 60% funding of the bonus pool. Accordingly and considering the individual performance by each of the named executive officers, the Committee approved the following bonus payments under the EPP. These payment amounts are also shown in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 19.

		Target as								Actual bonus				Actual bonus				Actual
		% of base				Target				as % of base				% of				Amount
Name		salary				($)				salary				Target				Earned ($)
Efraim Grinberg			75	%			712,500				45	%			60	%			427,500
Richard Coté			75	%			431,250				45	%			60	%			259,000
Eugene Karpovich			50	%			150,000				30	%			67	%			100,000
Timothy Michno			30	%			93,600				18	%			60	%			56,000

          Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

          Stock Incentive Plan

          Stock ownership is a key element of the Company’s compensation program for the named executive officers, senior management generally, as well as mid level managers throughout the Company. Under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, which was amended, restated and approved by the shareholders in 2004 (the “SIP”), the Committee may grant participants shares of the Company’s Common Stock, restricted stock, share units, stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units and/or performance bonuses. In granting these awards, the Committee may establish any conditions or restrictions it deems appropriate.

          Most grants under the SIP were in the form of stock options until March 2003. At that time, the Committee decided to utilize primarily time-vesting stock awards for most grants (pursuant to which, unrestricted shares of Common Stock are issued to the grantee when the award vests) and to use stock options primarily for grants to certain newly hired and/or newly promoted employees and to the CEO and the COO. The Committee believes that for the CEO and the COO stock options are an effective means to closely tie individual performance directly to the Company’s stock price performance, because stock options will have no value unless the Company’s share price has increased from the date of grant (unlike stock awards, which will have some value upon vesting even if the price of the Company’s stock has declined since the date of grant). Option grants to the CEO and COO last year are reflected on the Summary Compensation table on page 19 and the Grants of Plan Based Awards table on page 21. Newly hired and promoted employees who receive options are granted them by the Committee either prospectively, effective on the specified date of their hire or the date of their promotion, or after their hiring or promotion on the next regularly scheduled meeting date of the Committee.

          Beginning in fiscal 2007, the Committee decided to limit the grant of annual, time-vesting stock awards exclusively to the Company’s middle management and, except to reward specific, especially notable performance or in connection with promotions, to no longer grant such awards to the Company’s senior executives. Instead, the named executive officers and other senior executives are typically granted annual performance-based awards under the long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) component under the SIP. The Committee took this action because it believes that performance-based awards are a more effective means to focus executives’ efforts on the achievement of specific financial objectives. The LTIP is discussed below.

          The Committee makes annual grants under the SIP to the named executive officers and senior management within 30 days after the release of the Company’s fourth quarter and year-end earnings and generally grants annual time-vesting stock awards to the other SIP participants at its regularly scheduled meeting each March when it reviews prior year corporate performance and considers compensation levels for the new year.

          The number of stock options, stock awards and LTIP awards granted to SIP participants each year is designed to deliver relatively consistent value on a year-to-year basis. Therefore, the number of shares subject to awards is adjusted each year based primarily on changes in the Company’s stock price. In determining award levels, the Committee also looks to data relating to peer group companies obtained from FW Cook and general market data obtained by the Company’s Human Resources department. Award levels vary among participants and generally reflect the position held by the grantee, contributions made by the person in the prior fiscal year as well as expectations of future contributions. The Committee considers adjustments to award levels when appropriate based on changes in the executive’s performance, changes in the competitive marketplace, the financial accounting expense of the grant to the Company, or other factors. In determining equity grant amounts for certain newly hired employees, the Committee may also take into account any equity compensation that the individual is forfeiting from his or her former position.

          Options, time-vesting stock grants and performanced-based awards are designed to retain executive officers and management level employees by generally vesting either entirely on the third anniversary of the grant date (in the case of stock grants), incrementally over three years from the grant date (in the case of options) or upon the achievement of a predetermined performance goal after a specified period of time (i.e., three years) in the case of LTIP awards. All of these equity awards are designed to encourage recipients to focus on enhancing shareholder value over the long term by directly aligning the grantee’s financial interests with the interests of the Company’s

shareholders. All options granted under the SIP have an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date.

          Long-Term Incentive Plan

          Under the LTIP that was initially adopted in fiscal 2007, key employees of the Company (currently approximately 40 executives worldwide) have been granted “Performance Share Units” by the Committee for each of the three-year performance periods ending January 31, 2009 and January 31, 2010. Each Performance Share Unit represents the right to receive a share of Common Stock if the predetermined performance goal is satisfied in the applicable three-year period (“Award Period”). Under the LTIP, Performance Share Units vest based upon the Company’s achievement of a specified operating margin (calculated as operating profit ÷ net sales), adjusted to exclude the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, for the final fiscal year in the Award Period (the “Performance Goal”). The Committee established operating margin as the Performance Goal to support the Company’s strategic plan of increasing profitability.

          The objectives of the LTIP are to:

	•		link compensation directly to the achievement of specific corporate goals, namely improvement of operating margin;
	•		utilize best competitive practices in executive compensation to attract, retain and motivate key employees; and
	•		enhance the connection between the Company’s operating performance, creation of shareholder value and long-term executive compensation.

          The actual number of shares of Common Stock earned by a participant is based on the Company’s actual performance at the end of the Award Period relative to the Performance Goal and can range from 0% to 150% of the target award. No participant receives any Performance Share Units unless at least 89.5% of the Performance Goal (threshold performance) is achieved. Depending on the extent to which the Performance Goal is achieved, up to 50% of the shares of Common Stock equal to the target award will be distributed within 75 days after the completion of the Award Period and the remainder of the earned shares will be distributed on the second anniversary of the completion of the Award Period. Participants must be employed at the completion of the Award Period to receive any shares. The amount deferred to the second anniversary is subject to forfeiture only in the event of the participant’s voluntary resignation or termination of the participant’s employment for cause. A pro-rata payout will be made for “retirement” (as defined in the LTIP), permanent disability (as determined by the Committee) or death occurring during the Award Period based on actual performance at the end of the Award Period. The Committee retains the right, in its discretion, to modify, cancel or suspend the LTIP and to make exceptions to any of the provisions of the LTIP on a case-by-case basis.

          For further discussion of dividend rights and vesting of the Performance Share Units in the event of a change in control, see the discussion following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. LTIP grants to the named executive officers in fiscal 2008 are reflected in the Summary Compensation table on page 19 and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 21.

          Retirement and Other Post Employment Benefits

          401(k) Plan

          All employees in the United States including the named executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s Employee Savings and Investment Plan (“401(k) Plan”). In addition, the named executive officers as well as certain other executives selected by the Committee are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives.

          Deferred Compensation Plan

          The Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (“DCP”) was originally adopted effective June 1, 1995, and was approved by the Company’s shareholders on June 14, 1996. It was amended at the annual shareholders meeting in 2004 to extend its term through June 17, 2014. The plan is designed to offer retirement benefits to the named executive officers, senior management and key employees, consistent with overall market practices to attract and retain the talent needed in the Company. Under the DCP, participants may defer
up to 10%

of their base salary annually and the Company will credit to the account of each participant a matching contribution in an amount equal to one hundred percent of the salary deferral up to a maximum match equal to either 10% (for “group I” participants) or 5% (for “group II” participants) of the participant’s base salary. Of the named executive officers, Mr. E. Grinberg, Mr. G. Grinberg and Mr. Coté are group I participants and Messrs. Karpovich and Michno are group II participants. Twenty percent of the Company’s matching contribution is in the form of rights to Common Stock vesting ratably in annual installments over five years. Participants may direct the investment of amounts in their accounts (other than rights to Common Stock) among investment funds that are made available to them under the plan. Those funds and their returns for calendar year 2007 are shown on page 24 under the heading “NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION”. Further information regarding the participation by the named executive officers in the DCP is discussed in further detail under the heading “NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION” on page 24.

          Severance Agreements

          The Company has severance agreements with Mr. Coté, Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno in order to prohibit them from working in the watch or jewelry business for six months after the termination of their employment for any reason and to prevent them from soliciting Company employees for 12 months thereafter. Under the agreement with Mr. Coté, he will continue to be paid his then current base salary for 24 months after the termination of his employment following a change in control unless termination was by the Company for cause (or as a result of his death or disability) or was voluntary by Mr. Coté without good reason. Under their agreements, Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno will each continue to be paid their then current base salary plus costs for COBRA coverage for up to 12 months if the Company terminates their employment without cause. For a detailed description of the agreements between the Company and each of Mr. Coté, Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno, please refer to the discussion under the heading “Severance Agreements” on page 25.

          Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

          As part of providing a competitive executive compensation program, the Company provides the CEO, COO and Chairman of the Board with certain perquisites, described below, that the Company and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program. The Committee reviews annually the levels of perquisites provided to these named executive officers.

          The Company reimburses the CEO and COO for certain automobile-related expenses incurred by them in connection with their commuting to the Company’s offices.

          The Company has purchased life insurance policies insuring both the CEO and the Chairman of the Board and pays the premiums for that insurance. Under this arrangement, the named insureds are entitled to the cash surrender value in respect of these life insurance policies and their respective beneficiaries are entitled to the applicable death benefits without, in either event, reimbursement to the Company.

          Under a Death and Disability Benefit Plan agreement with Mr. G. Grinberg, dated September 23, 1994, in the event of Mr. G. Grinberg’s death or disability while employed by the Company, the Company will pay to his spouse, if she is then living, an annual benefit equal, as of fiscal 2008, to $388,083 (increased October 1 each year by an amount equal to two percent of the benefit that would have been payable in the prior year). Benefits are payable for the lesser of 10 years or the life of Mr. G. Grinberg’s spouse, and are payable only from the general assets of the Company. Neither Mr. G. Grinberg nor his spouse may assign the agreement or any of the benefits payable thereunder and none of the benefits are payable to the estates or any of the heirs of Mr. G. Grinberg or his spouse. The agreement provides that it automatically terminates in the event of the termination of Mr. G. Grinberg’s employment with the Company for any reason other than his death or disability. For purposes of the agreement, “disability” means the inability of Mr. G. Grinberg to perform the duties pertaining to his job because of accident, sickness or other illness as determined by a majority of disinterested directors.

          Attributed costs of the perquisites described above for the named executive officers for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, are included in column (i) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 19.

          Deductibility of Executive Compensation

          As part of its role, the Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m), which provides that the Company may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to the chief executive officer and the three other highest paid executives (other than our chief financial officer) unless the compensation meets certain requirements relating to performance-based compensation. The Company believes that compensation paid under the management incentive plans is generally fully deductible for federal income tax purposes. However, in certain situations, the Committee may approve compensation that may not meet these requirements in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for its executive officers.

          Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

          Beginning on February 1, 2006, the Company began accounting for stock-based payments in accordance with the requirements of FASB Statement 123(R). The Committee considers the expense implications of the equity compensation awards in determining the aggregate annual award levels.

          The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Alan H. Howard, Chairman		Donald Oresman
Margaret Hayes Adame		Leonard L. Silverstein

          The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth information about the compensation paid in respect of fiscal 2008 by the Company to the CEO, the Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”) and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (the “named executive officers”).

																										(h)
																										Change in
																						(g)				Pension Value
																						Non-Equity				and Nonquali-
														(e)				(f)				Incentive				fied Deferred				(i)
(a)						(c)				(d)				Stock				Option				Plan				Compensation				All Other				(j)
Name and		(b)				Salary				Bonus				Awards				Awards				Compensation				Earnings				Compensation				Total
Principal Position		Year				($)(1)				($)				($)(2)				($) (2)				($)(3)				($)				($)				($)
Efraim Grinberg,			2008				949,734				—				265,186				508,867				425,500				—				157,280	(4)			2,306,567
President and Chief			2007				941,346				—				97,013				342,989				675,000				—				148,588				2,204,936
Executive Officer
Eugene J. Karpovich			2008				295,673				—				82,529				23,895				100,000				—				24,712	(5)			526,809
Senior Vice President,			2007				270,674				—				65,854				19,530				131,000				—				22,500				509,558
Chief Financial Officer
Gedalio Grinberg ,			2008				650,000				—				—				—				—				—				585,996	(6)			1,235,996
Chairman of the Board			2007				650,000				—				—				—				—				—				492,625				1,142,625
Richard Coté,			2008				574,999				—				281,777				278,277				259,000				—				74,104	(7)			1,468,157
Executive			2007				566,346				—				231,893				178,750				410,000				—				70,501				1,457,490
Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
Timothy F. Michno			2008				309,462				—				35,798				31,860				56,000				—				24,862	(8)			457,982
Secretary and General			2007				295,672				—				23,435				26,040				90,000				—				23,150				458,297
Counsel

																																						Grant
																														All Other								Date
																														Option				Exercise				Fair
																														Awards:				or Base				Value of
																														Number of				Price				Stock
						Estimated Possible Payouts																								Securities				of				and
						Under Non-Equity												Estimate Future Payouts Under												Underlying				Option				Option
						Incentive Plan Awards												Equity Incentive Plan Awards												Options				Awards				Awards
		Grant				(c)				(d)				(e)				(f)				(g)				(h)				(#)				($/sh)				($)
Name		Date				Threshold				Target				Maximum				Threshold				Target				Maximum				(3)								(4)
(a)		(b)				($) (1)				($) (1)				($)(1)				(#) (2)				(#) (2)				(#) (2)				(j)				(k)				(l)
Efraim			04/30/07				—				712,500				1,068,750				9,375				18,750				28,125				40,000				32.92				617,250
Grinberg			04/30/07																																				518,400
Eugene							—				150,000				225,000																								123,450
Karpovich			04/30/07																1,875				3,750				5,625
Gedalio			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Grinberg (5)
Richard Coté			04/30/07				—				431,250				646,875				6,875				13,750				20,625				24,000				32.92				452,650
			04/30/07																																				311,040
Timothy							—				93,600				140,400
Michno			04/30/07																1,250				2,500				3,750												82,300

          Each Performance Share Unit, reflected in columns (f), (g) and (h) in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table above, is credited with dividend equivalents equal to the dividends paid on one share of Common Stock during the three-year Award Period and the subsequent two-year mandatory deferral period. Dividend equivalents are in the form of phantom stock units, with each unit representing one share of Common Stock. The

number of shares of Common Stock underlying the phantom stock units will be distributed at the same time as the distribution of earned shares in respect of the Performance Share Units.

          Upon the occurrence of a “Change in Control” (as defined in the SIP), all or a portion of the Performance Share Units awarded will be converted on a one-for-one basis to time-vesting phantom stock units without pro-ration based on the chart below, which will vest at the end of the Award Period. Upon vesting, one share of Common Stock will be distributed for each phantom stock unit not previously forfeited. The number of Performance Share Units that are converted into time-vesting phantom stock units depends on the time during an Award Period when the Change in Control occurs as follows:

Time of the Change in Control		Shares Converted Based on:
Months 1 through 12		Threshold performance (89.5%)
Months 13 through 24		Target performance (100%)
Months 25 through 36		Actual performance to date

If a participant’s employment is terminated without cause within 24 months after the Change in Control, any unvested phantom stock units will become immediately vested and payable.

																						Stock Awards
																																		(j)
																																		Equity
																																		Incentive
Option Awards																														(i)				Plan
										(d)																				Equity				Awards:
										Equity																				Incentive				Market or
										Incentive																				Plan				Payout
										Plan																(h)				Awards:				Value of
						(c)				Awards:												(g)				Market				Number of				Unearned
		(b)				Number of				Number of												Number of				Value of				Unearned				Shares,
		Number of				Securities				Securities												Shares or				Shares or				Shares, Units				Units or
		Securities				Underlying				Underlying				(e)								Units of				Units of				or Other				Other
		Underlying				Unexercised				Unexercised				Option				(f)				Stock that				Stock				Rights That				Rights
		Unexercised				Options (#)				Unearned				Exercise				Option				Have Not				That				Have Not				That Have
(a)		Options (#)				Unexercisable				Options				Price				Expiration				Vested				Have Not				Vested				Not Vested
Name		Exercisable				(1)				(#)				($)				Date				(2) (#)				Vested ($)				(3) (#)				(3) ($)
Efraim			100,000								—				12.00				3/30/09				—				—				39,375				953,663
Grinberg			303,898												15.02				3/16/11
			94,962												15.57				3/16/11
			177,542												18.48				3/16/11
			66,667				33,333								18.34				3/22/15
			16,667				33,333								18.41				5/31/16
			0				40,000								32.92				4/30/17
Eugene			15,000								—				12.50				3/11/12				3,500				84,770				7,875				190,733
Karpovich			1,312												11.92				3/16/11
			1,974												14.36				3/16/11
			3,233												18.48				3/16/11
			706												18.48				3/11/12
			5,000				10,000								14.05				8/27/14
Richard			400,000								—				10.50				1/06/10				10,000				242,200				29,375				711,463
Coté			60,000												4.25				5/17/10
			173,882												15.57				3/16/11
			105,050												18.47				3/16/11
			33,334				16,666								18.34				3/22/15
			10,000				20,000								18.41				5/31/16
			0				24,000								32.92				4/30/17
Gedalio			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Grinberg
Timothy			0				13,333				—				14.05				8/27/14				1,200				29,064				3,250				78,715
Michno

		Exercise
		Price				Vesting				Shares
Name		($/share)				Date				(#)
Efraim Grinberg			18.34				3/22/08				33,333
			18.41				5/31/08				16,667
			18.41				5/31/09				16,666
			32.92				4/30/08				13,333
			32.92				4/30/09				13,333
			32.92				4/30/10				13,334
Eugene Karpovich			14.05				8/27/08				5,000
			14.05				8/27/09				5,000
Richard Coté			18.34				3/22/08				16,666
			18.41				5/31/08				10,000
			18.41				5/31/09				10,000
			32.92				4/30/08				8,000
			32.92				4/30/09				8,000
			32.92				4/30/10				8,000
Timothy Michno			14.05				8/27/08				6,667
			14.05				8/27/09				6,666

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL 2008

		Option Awards								Stock Awards
		(b)				(c)				(d)				(e)
		Number of Shares				Value Realized				Number of Shares				Value Realized
(a)		Acquired on Exercise				on Exercise				Acquired on Vesting				on Vesting
Name		(#)				($)(1)				(#)				($) (2)
Efraim Grinberg			100,000				1,935,500				—				—
Eugene Karpovich			14,000				346,803				4,000				120,640
Gedalio Grinberg			—				—				—				—
Richard Coté			—				—				20,000				603,200
Timothy Michno			6,667				106,672				1,580				47,653

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

          Under the Company’s DCP, participants may defer up to 10% of their base salary annually and the Company will credit to the account of each participant a matching contribution in an amount equal to the salary deferral, up to a maximum match of either 10% or 5% of the participant’s base salary (depending on whether the participant is included in group I or group II). Of the named executive officers, Mr. E. Grinberg, Mr. G. Grinberg and Mr. Coté are in group I and Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno are in group II. Deferral elections must be made no later than December 31 of the year before the year in which the salary will be deferred. Twenty percent of the Company’s matching contribution is made in the form of rights to the Company’s Common Stock, vesting ratably in annual installments over five years, representing the number of shares (including fractional shares) of Common Stock that the matching contribution could purchase based upon the New York Stock Exchange’s closing price of the stock on the date when the matching contribution is made. Matching contributions are made on the last business day of each calendar quarter. Participants may direct the investment of amounts in their accounts (other than rights to Common Stock) among investment funds that are made available to them under the plan. The table below shows the funds available under the DCP and their annual rate of return for calendar 2007 as reported by the plan administrator.

		Rate of Return
Name of Fund		(%)
American Funds EuroPacific Growth-R4			18.87
American Funds Growth Fund of America- R4			10.88
Columbia Mid Cap Value-Z			7.65
Davis New York Venture-A			4.97
First Eagle Overseas-A			8.39
JPMorgan Equity Index-Select			5.28
JPMorgan Intrepid Value-Select			0.11
JPMorgan US Real Estate-Select			-17.45
Lazard Emerging Market-Open			32.71
Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap-A			-1.55
RiverSource Mid Cap Value-R4			-3.34
T Rowe Price Growth Stock-Adv			10.12
American Beacon Balanced- Plan Ahead			1.78
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2010-Select			5.07
JPMorgan SmartRetirement-2015-Select			5.32
JPMorgan SmartReturement2020-Select			5.38
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030-Select			6.30
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040-Select			6.37
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Income-Select			4.96
JPMorgan Prime Money Market-Morgan			4.90
JPMorgan High Yield Bond-A			1.92
PIMCO Total Return-Admin			8.84

          A participant’s salary deferrals and any earnings on those deferrals are immediately vested. Company matching contributions and any discretionary contributions vest at the rate of 20% per year so long as the participant remains employed by the Company. A participant who attains the age of 65 or whose employment terminates due to death or disability automatically vests in all amounts in such participant’s account. A participant whose employment terminates for other reasons forfeits unvested amounts. If there is a “change in control” (as defined in the DCP) of the Company, all amounts attributable to matching contributions (but not discretionary Company contributions) become fully vested on the date of such change in control.

          Distributions from the DCP commence in the January following termination of the participant’s employment, unless such termination was less than six months before January 1, in which case distributions commence the next following January 1. Vested benefits, including shares of Company Common Stock, are paid in

10 annual installments unless (i) the Company determines to pay the benefits in a lump sum or (ii) a participant who is a former employee provides services to a competitor within two years following termination of employment, in which case all remaining benefits will be paid to the participant in a lump sum. Common Stock is distributed by the Company issuing to each participant, or to his or her beneficiary, shares of Common Stock equal to the whole number of vested share units then credited in such participant’s account. Any credited dividend amounts and any fractional shares are paid in cash.

          The following table shows the deferrals made by the named executive officers and the contributions made by the Company under the DCP in fiscal 2008.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN FISCAL 2008

(a)		(b)				(c)				(d)				(e)				(f)
		Executive				Registrant				Aggregate				Aggregate				Aggregate
		Contributions				Contributions				Earnings in				Withdrawals/				Balance at
Name		in Last FY ($)(1)				in Last FY ($) (1)				Last FY ($)				Distributions ($)				Last FY ($) (2)
Efraim Grinberg			95,000				95,000				43,827				0				2,855,666
Eugene Karpovich			17,654				14,712				11,487				0				264,986
Gedalio Grinberg			65,000				65,000				(47,158	)			0				3,286,805
Richard Coté			422,500				57,500				36,360				0				3,100,066
Timothy Michno			15,462				15,462				5,537				1,486				376,429

		Cash				Non-Cash				Value of
		Contribution				Contribution				Share Units
Name		($)				(# share units)				($)
Efraim Grinberg			76,000				640.12				19,000
Eugene Karpovich			11,770				98.91				2,942
Gedalio Grinberg			52,000				437.98				13,000
Richard Coté			46,000				384.33				11,500
Timothy Michno			12,370				103.34				3,092

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS ON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

          None of the named executive officers have employment agreements. The Company has entered into severance agreements with Mr. Coté, Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno which are described below. In addition, the DCP and the SIP provide for accelerated vesting, respectively, of Company matching contributions and of equity compensation (stock options and stock awards) in the event of a change in control. The SIP also provides for accelerated vesting of equity awards in the event of a participant’s death, disability or retirement.

          Severance Agreements

          Mr. Coté’s agreement provides for the continuation of his then applicable annual base salary, paid bi-weekly for 24 months following the termination of his employment within two years after a change in control. (defined as the acquisition by a person or group of more than 50% of the combined aggregate voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding shares; or certain mergers and asset sales; or a liquidation or

dissolution), except that nothing is due if his termination is because of his death or disability, or is by the Company for cause or is by Mr. Coté other than because of an “adverse change” in the conditions of his employment. Mr. Coté’s agreement defines such an adverse change as any of the following by the Company:

	•		altering his duties or responsibilities so that his position becomes one of substantially less importance, dignity or scope;
	•		reducing his base salary;
	•		discontinuing his participation in any compensation or benefit plan in which (and on at least as favorable a basis as) he was participating before the change in control or barring him from participating in any other plan that may be adopted in which other key employees are entitled to participate;
	•		requiring that he be based more than 50 miles from the principal office location where he worked before the change in control.

“Cause” is defined as gross negligence or willful misconduct that has resulted in or is likely to result in material economic damage to the Company. The agreement also obligates Mr. Coté to keep confidential and to not use any confidential information pertaining to the Company obtained by him in the course of his employment.

          If there had been a change in control of the Company on January 31, 2008 and Mr. Coté’s employment had been terminated immediately thereafter by the Company without cause then he would have been entitled to the continuation of his then current annual base salary of $575,000 paid in bi-weekly installments through January 31, 2010.

          Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno each have a severance agreement with the Company providing that, although each is employed at will, he will be entitled to receive severance payments in the form of salary continuation upon termination of his employment by the Company without cause. For this purpose, “cause” is defined as conviction of a felony, the knowing violation of a material Company policy, the failure to perform any material obligation owed to the Company or the gross negligence in the performance of duties or breach of fiduciary duty as determined by the CEO. The severance payments will be paid for 12 months after termination, in bi-weekly installments. The employee will also be entitled to post-termination medical benefit coverage continuation under COBRA for the 12 month severance period or, if shorter, until becoming eligible for Medicare or accepting employment with another employer which provides medical benefits. The agreements also contain a non-competition clause which proscribes employment in the watch or jewelry industry for six months after termination of employment with the Company, a twelve month non-solicitation clause and a confidentiality provision. If the Company had terminated the employment of Mr. Karpovich and Mr. Michno without cause on January 31, 2008, then they would have been entitled to receive, respectively, $300,000 and $312,000 in severance paid in bi-weekly installments through January 31, 2009. Each of them also would have been entitled to maximum COBRA benefits, valued at $10,267 for Mr. Karpovich and $21,218 for Mr. Michno, representing total maximum COBRA payments the Company would be obligated to make for each of them through January 31, 2009.

          Change in Control

          In the event of a change in control of the Company, all unvested matching contributions under the DCP and all unvested options and time-vesting stock awards then outstanding under the SIP immediately vest. Both plans have similar definitions for what is considered a “change in control” including:

	•		(under both plans) dissolution or liquidation of the Company;
	•		(under both plans) sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets;
	•		a change in the composition of the Board of Directors such that: (under the SIP) individuals who were on the Board of Directors on April 8, 2004 (or their successors who were approved by at least two-thirds of the directors then on the Board) cease to constitute a majority; or (under the DCP) individuals who were on the Board on July 1, 2002 (or their successors who were approved by at least two-thirds of the directors then on the Board) cease to constitute at least two-thirds of the members of the Board;

•

a merger, consolidation or reorganization unless:

	ú		shareholders in the Company immediately before any such transaction control at least 50% (under the SIP) or 70% (under the DCP) of the total voting power in the resulting corporation immediately after any such transaction; and
	ú		no person (meaning an individual, entity or group acting in concert) acquires at least 20% (under the SIP) or 30% (under the DCP) of the voting power in the resulting corporation (unless, under the DCP, such person had 20% or more of the voting power before the transaction); and
	ú		a majority (under the SIP) or at least two-thirds (under the DCP) of the members of the Board after the transaction were members of the Board immediately before the transaction; and

•

the acquisition by any person (with certain exceptions) of 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding voting securities (or, under the DCP, the commencement of a tender offer for such securities).

          Under the Company’s LTIP, which was adopted by the Compensation Committee under the SIP and is discussed on page 16 under “Fiscal 2008 Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” and on page 21 following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table, Performance-based Share Units do not become immediately vested upon a change in control but, instead, convert one for one into time-vesting phantom stock units (without pro-ration) which vest at the end of the applicable Award Period. Upon vesting, one share of Common Stock is distributed for each phantom stock unit not previously forfeited.

          The following table shows the value of accelerated vesting of stock options and stock awards under the SIP and of Company contributions under the DCP that would have been provided to the named executive officers in the event that a change in control of the Company had occurred immediately after the close of business on January 31, 2008.

Vesting Upon Change in Control
With or Without Termination of Employment
		Early Vesting of				Early Vesting
		Deferred				of				Early Vesting
		Compensation				Stock Options				of Stock
Name		Plan ($)				($)(1)				Awards ($) (2)
Efraim Grinberg			196,029				389,663				—
Eugene Karpovich			28,830				101,700				84,770
Gedalio Grinberg			—				—				—
Richard Coté			114,298				214,196				242,200
Timothy Michno			26,570				135,597				29,064

          Death or Disability; Retirement

          If any of the named executive officers had died, become permanently disabled or retired on January 31, 2008, their unvested stock options and stock awards would have immediately vested on that date. Under the SIP, retirement triggers immediate vesting when an employee reaches the age of 65 or upon reaching the age of 55, provided, in that case, the employee has been employed continuously by the Company for at least 10 years and the Compensation Committee approves. As part of its approval, the Compensation Committee may impose any

conditions as it deems to be appropriate which are not inconsistent with the express terms of the SIP, including covenants dealing with non-competition, non-disparagement, non-solicitation and confidentiality. The values of such early vesting are shown in the table above under the columns “Early Vesting of Stock Options” and “Early Vesting of Stock Awards”.

          Under the LTIP, in the event of a participant’s death, permanent disability or retirement during any Award Period, his or her award is only determined at the end of that Award Period based on actual performance and will be prorated based on the time employed during the Award Period. After the prorated award is determined, it will be paid out within 75 days after the end of the Award Period. The definition of retirement under the LTIP is the same as the definition under the SIP.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

          No executive officer of the Company receives any additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. In fiscal 2008, we paid each director who was not an employee of the Company an annual retainer of $30,000. In addition, in fiscal 2008, we paid the Chair of the Audit Committee an annual fee of $10,000, and each of the Chairs of the Compensation and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees an annual fee of $5,000 for service in these capacities. Each committee member was also paid $1,500 for each committee meeting attended, and we reimbursed reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by directors in connection with attending meetings and performing other Board-related services for the Company in accordance with the same policies applicable to our employees generally.

          Also in fiscal 2008, we granted each non-employee director a stock option to purchase 1,500 shares of Common Stock and a time-vesting stock award for 750 shares of Common Stock under the Company’s 1996 SIP. The stock option and the stock award each vested on April 30, 2008, which was the one year anniversary of the grant date . The exercise price of each option is the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The option expires ten years from the grant date.

          The following chart shows the cash amounts and the value of other compensation paid to each non-employee director for their service in fiscal 2008:

		Fees Earned or				Stock				Option
		Paid in Cash				Awards(1)				Awards(2)				Total
Name		($)				($)				($)				($)
(a)		(b)				(c)				(d)				(h)
Margaret Hayes Adame			39,000				29,420				28,082				96,502
Alan H. Howard			50,000				29,420				28,082				107,502
Richard Isserman			36,000				29,420				28,082				93,502
Nathan Leventhal			36,500				29,420				28,082				94,002
Donald Oresman			55,000				29,420				28,082				112,502
Leonard L. Silverstein			40,500				29,420				28,082				98,002

          At its meeting on March 25, 2008, upon the advice of FW Cook, a nationally recognized executive compensation consulting firm, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors unanimously approved a recommendation to modify the compensation paid to the independent directors. The modifications, which were unanimously adopted and approved by the Board on March 25, 2008, eliminate the $1,500 fee paid per meeting attended, increase the annual fee paid to the chair of the Compensation Committee from $5,000 to $6,500 and establish the total annual retainer at a value of $100,000 comprised of a $50,000 cash component and a $50,000 equity component in the form of a stock award, vesting in one year. The changes will take effect on May 1, 2008.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

          The Company has a Death and Disability Benefit Plan Agreement with Mr. G. Grinberg, dated September 23, 1994. Under that agreement, in the event of Mr. G. Grinberg’s death or disability while employed by the Company, the Company will pay to his spouse, if she is then living, an annual benefit equal, as of fiscal 2008, to $388,083 (increased October 1 each year by an amount equal to two percent of the benefit that would have been payable in the prior year). Benefits are payable for the lesser of 10 years or the life of Mr. G. Grinberg’s spouse, and are payable only from the general assets of the Company. Neither Mr. G. Grinberg nor his spouse may assign the agreement or any of the benefits payable thereunder and none of the benefits are payable to the estates or any of the heirs of Mr. G. Grinberg or his spouse. The agreement also provides that it automatically terminates in the event of the termination of Mr. G. Grinberg’s employment with the Company for any reason other than his death or disability and further provides that it is not to be considered a contract of employment. For purposes of the agreement, “disability” means the inability of Mr. G. Grinberg to perform the duties pertaining to his job because of accident, sickness or other illness as determined by a majority of disinterested directors.

          In fiscal 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with a trust which, at that time, owned an insurance policy issued on the lives of Mr. G. Grinberg and his spouse. The insurance policy provides for a death benefit of $27 million. The trustees of the trust are the three children of Mr. G. Grinberg and his spouse, namely, Efraim Grinberg, Alexander Grinberg and Miriam Phalen. Under the agreement, the trust assigned the insurance policy to the Company as collateral to secure repayment by the trust of interest-free loans made by the Company to the trust in amounts equal to the premiums on the insurance policy (approximately $740,000 per annum). The agreement required the trust to repay the loans from the death benefit proceeds of the policy. At January 31, 2003, the Company had loaned the trust $5,186,860 under this agreement. On April 4, 2003, the agreement was amended and restated to transfer the policy (which at that time had a cash surrender value of $4,595,591) from the trust to the Company in partial repayment of the then outstanding loan balance which, as of that date, was reduced to $591,269. If the policy is terminated prior to the death of the insureds, the trust must repay the Company the amount of the accumulated premiums which the Company would also recover from the death benefit in the event it is paid.

          Mr. Alex Grinberg, a beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and the brother of Efraim Grinberg, is the President of the Company’s Concord brand in the United States and earned $314,509 in salary and annual cash incentive compensation in fiscal 2008. In addition, as a participant in the Company’s LTIP, Mr. Alex Grinberg received an award of 1,250 Performance Share Units last year, subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to similar awards made to the other participants in that plan.

          Mr. David Phalen is the spouse of Miriam Phalen, a beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, and the brother-in-law of Efraim Grinberg. Mr. Phalen is President of Movado Company Stores and earned $443,477 in salary and annual bonus in fiscal 2008. In addition, as a participant in the Company’s LTIP, Mr. Phalen received an award of 3,750 Performance Share Units last year, subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to similar awards made to the other participants in that plan.

          The Board of Directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which provides for the review, approval and ratification of transactions with the Company (or any of its subsidiaries) in which any officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any director has any direct or indirect material interest. Such transactions involving any executive officer of the Company or any member of the Board of Directors are referred to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Other transactions are referred to the Company’s General

Counsel. In each case, the standard applied under the Company’s code is whether the transaction, when considered in the context of all the relevant facts and circumstances, including the person’s position with the Company, the nature of the transaction and the amount involved, could reasonably appear to present a conflict of interest.

          See “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” for information regarding certain business relationships between the Company and Mr. Silverstein’s law firm.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

          The table below sets forth information with respect to shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans as of January 31, 2008.

Number of securities

Remaining Available For

Future Issuance Under

Number of Securities to be

Weighted-Average

Equity Compensation

Issued Upon Exercise Of

Exercise Price of

Plans (Excluding

Outstanding Options, Warrants

Outstanding Options,

securities Reflected in

and Rights

Warrants and Rights

Column (a))

Plan category

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

3,238,498

(2)

$

14.63

(3)

1,747,483

(4)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (5)

68,943

Not applicable

0

(5)

Total

3,307,441

$

14.63

1,747,483