UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21517
----------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
1001 Warrenville Road
Suite 300
LISLE, IL 60532
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
W. Scott Jardine
First Trust Portfolios L.P.
1001 Warrenville Road
Suite 300
LISLE, IL 60532
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name and address of agent for service)
registrant's telephone number, including area code: 630-241-4141
-------------
Date of fiscal year end: MAY 31
-------
Date of reporting period: MAY 31, 2006
-------------
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with
the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of
any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may
use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review,
inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR,
and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not
required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR
unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the
information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the
burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under
the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
The Report to Shareholders is attached herewith.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND (FVI)
ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND (FVI)
MAY 31, 2006
Shareholder Letter.......................................................... 1
Portfolio Commentary........................................................ 2
Portfolio Components........................................................ 4
Portfolio of Investments.................................................... 5
Statement of Assets and Liabilities......................................... 11
Statement of Operations..................................................... 12
Statements of Changes in Net Assets......................................... 13
Financial Highlights........................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements............................................... 15
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm..................... 18
Additional Information...................................................... 19
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
Portfolio Holdings
Tax Information
By-Law Amendments
Advisory Agreement
Board of Trustees and Officers.............................................. 22
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. Forward-looking statements
include statements regarding the goals, beliefs, plans or current expectations
of First Trust Advisors L.P. (the "Advisor") and its representatives, taking
into account the information currently available to them. Forward-looking
statements include all statements that do not relate solely to current or
historical fact. For example, forward-looking statements include the use of
words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "expect," "believe," "plan,"
"may," "should," "would" or other words that convey uncertainty of future events
or outcomes.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause the First Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity
Allocation Fund's (the "Fund") actual results, performance or achievements to be
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. When evaluating the
information included in this Annual Report, you are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect the judgment of the
Advisor and its representatives only as of the date hereof. We undertake no
obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to
reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT
This report contains information that can help you evaluate your investment. It
includes details about the Fund and presents data and analysis that provide
insight into the Fund's performance and investment approach.
By reading the letter from the Fund's President, James A. Bowen, together with
the commentary by Robert F. Carey, who is the Chief Investment Officer of the
Advisor, you will obtain an understanding of how the market environment affected
the Fund's performance. The statistical information that follows can help you
understand the Fund's performance compared to that of relevant market
benchmarks.
It is important to keep in mind that the opinions expressed by Mr. Bowen, Mr.
Carey and personnel of the Advisor are just that: informed opinions. They should
not be considered to be promises or advice. The opinions, like the statistics,
cover the period through the date on the cover of this report. Of course, the
risks of investing in the Fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHAREHOLDER LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND (FVI)
ANNUAL REPORT
MAY 31, 2006
Dear Shareholders:
We are pleased to present you with this annual report of the First Trust/Value
Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund (the "Fund") (AMEX Symbol: FVI). Over
the one-year period ended May 31, 2006, the Fund continued to outperform its
benchmark, more than doubling the performance of the S&P 500 Index in both
market value and net asset value ("NAV") total returns. This report includes a
portfolio commentary, including the Fund's performance results, a listing of the
Fund's investments, and other financial statements for the reporting period.
The Fund seeks to provide capital appreciation utilizing an equity asset
allocation model provided by Ibbotson Associates to determine the optimal equity
allocations among the six asset classes: large-cap growth and value; mid-cap
growth and value and small-cap growth and value. The portfolio is selected from
those stocks ranked #1 or #2 in the Value Line(R) Timeliness(TM) Ranking System,
Value Line(R) Safety(TM) Ranking System or Value Line(R) Technical(TM) Ranking
System. The top 25 ranked stocks within each of the six asset classes are then
selected for the FVI portfolio, which results in approximately 150 stocks.
First Trust Advisors L.P. ("First Trust"), the Fund's advisor, serves as
investment advisor or portfolio supervisor to investment portfolios with
approximately $25 billion in assets which it managed or supervised as of May 31,
2006. Robert Carey is the Chief Investment Officer for First Trust. I encourage
you to read the portfolio commentary, which includes a review of the Fund's
performance and Robert's outlook for the markets.
We thank you for your continued confidence in First Trust and will work
diligently to keep earning it.
Sincerely,
/s/ James A. Bowen
James A. Bowen
President of the First Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund
July 14, 2006
Page 1
[PHOTO OF ROBERT F. CAREY]
ROBERT F. CAREY, CFA
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
FIRST TRUST ADVISORS L.P.
Mr. Carey is responsible for the overall management of research and analysis of
the First Trust product line. Mr. Carey has over 20 years of experience as an
Equity and Fixed-Income Analyst and is a recipient of the Chartered Financial
Analyst (CFA) designation. He is a graduate of the University of Illinois at
Champaign-Urbana with a B.S. in Physics. He is also a member of the Investment
Analysts Society of Chicago and the CFA Institute. Mr. Carey has appeared as a
guest on such programs as Bloomberg TV and CNBC and has been quoted by several
publications, including THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE WALL STREET REPORTER,
BLOOMBERG NEWS SERVICE, and REGISTERED REP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PORTFOLIO COMMENTARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERVIEW
The First Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund ("FVI" or the
"Fund") posted a market price total return of 26.3% and a net asset value
("NAV") total return of 21.5% for the one-year period ended May 31, 2006. Over
the same one-year period, the S&P 500 Index and S&P 1500 Super Composite Index,
which have exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks, gained 8.6% and 9.6%,
respectively. The Fund distributed $0.04 per share in net investment income
distributions, $3.80 per share in short-term capital gain distributions, and
$0.63 per share in long-term capital gain distributions for the 12-month period
ended May 31, 2006. The Fund's distribution rate, based on market price, was
0.2% as of May 31, 2006. FVI carried a beta of 1.06 as of May 31, 2006,
according to Bloomberg, which indicates that the Fund has slightly more price
volatility than the stocks in the S&P 500 Index. FVI traded at a 10.5% discount
to its NAV on May 31, 2006. Its daily share volume throughout the period
averaged 23,001 shares.
Following is a review of the portfolio strategy and composition, investment
environment and performance results of FVI for the one-year period ended May 31,
2006.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
The Fund's investment objective is to provide capital appreciation. Under normal
market conditions, the Fund will invest substantially all of its net assets in
common stocks that are selected through the application of a top-down asset
allocation strategy and a bottom-up stock selection methodology, in each case
implemented by First Trust Advisors L.P. (the "Advisor"). The Advisor utilizes
the Strategic Equity Asset Allocation Model of Ibbotson Associates (top-down) to
determine the optimal equity allocations among the following six U.S. equity
asset classes: (1) Large-Cap Growth, (2) Large-Cap Value, (3) Mid-Cap Growth,
(4) Mid-Cap Value, (5) Small-Cap Growth and (6) Small-Cap Value.
To select the stocks within each of the six U.S. equity classes, the Advisor
begins with the universe of stocks that Value Line(R) Publishing, Inc. gives a
Timeliness(TM), Safety(TM) or Technical(TM) Ranking of #1 or #2 using the Value
Line(R) Ranking Systems. The Advisor then applies a proprietary model to rank
the stocks contained in that universe to determine which stocks will be selected
for each of the six different U.S. equity asset classes. The Advisor then
selects the top 25 ranked stocks for each of the six asset classes for a total
of approximately 150 stocks in the portfolio.
The Advisor rebalances the Fund's portfolio holdings on a semi-annual basis and
adjusts the portfolio to reflect changes in the Ibbotson Strategic Equity Asset
Allocation Model on an annual basis. On a more frequent basis, the Advisor may
sell stocks that are no longer within the Value Line(R) universe of #1 and #2
rankings and replace them with new stocks. The Fund does not employ leverage.
DISTRIBUTIONS
The Fund distributed $0.04 per share in net investment income dividends for the
12-month period ended May 31, 2006. The Fund distributed a short-term capital
gain of $1.25 per share in June 2005. In December 2005, the Fund distributed a
short-term capital gain of $2.55 per share and a long-term capital gain of $0.63
per share. The distribution rate of the Fund was 0.2%, as of May 31, 2006, based
on market price.
COMPOSITION OF THE FUND
The Fund is usually comprised of 150 equity holdings. Over the past twelve
months, 265 stocks were sold and 264 were bought. As of May 31, 2006, the
weighted average market capitalization of the stocks in the portfolio was $25.6
billion, down slightly from $26.7 billion a year ago. The average market
capitalization was $14.3 billion, down from $15.7 billion a year ago. The
largest market capitalization holding in the portfolio was $368.5 billion, up
from $358.9 billion a year ago. The smallest market capitalization holding was
$646.0 million, up from $407.0 million a year ago.
As of May 31, 2006, the Strategic Equity Asset Allocation Model of Ibbotson
Associates, Inc. set the allocations among the six U.S. equity asset classes as
follows: Large-Cap Growth (31%), Large-Cap Value (33%), Mid-Cap Growth (8%),
Mid-Cap Value (10%), Small-Cap Growth (9%) and Small-Cap Value (9%).
Page 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PORTFOLIO COMMENTARY - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the 12-month period ended May 31, 2006, these six major U.S. equity asset
classes posted the following returns (as measured by Standard & Poor's &
Russell): S&P/Citigroup Growth Index (+3.6%), S&P/Citigroup Value Index
(+13.8%), S&P400/Citigroup (Mid-Cap) Growth Index (+13.3%), S&P 400/Citigroup
(Mid-Cap) Value Index (+17.8%), Russell 2000 (Small-Cap) Growth Index (+18.3%)
and Russell 2000 (Small-Cap) Value Index (+18.2%).
SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION
The following breakdown illustrates the major economic sector weightings
according to S&P's Global Industry Classification Standard for FVI as of May 31,
2005 and MAY 31, 2006: Basic Materials (5.0%; 11.1%); Consumer Discretionary
(16.1%; 14.9%); Consumer Staples (10.4%; 6.3%); Energy (19.7%; 14.6%); Financial
Services (11.0%; 6.7%); Health Care (9.0%; 1.7%); Industrials (7.5%; 18.2%);
Information Technology (12.9%; 19.7%); Telecommunications (2.4%; 3.8%);
Utilities (5.1%; 2.4%); and Cash & Equivalents (0.9%; 0.6%).
PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND
The Fund posted some impressive returns for the one-year period. Based on market
price, the Fund's total return was 26.3% for the 12-month period ended May 31,
2006. Its NAV total return was 21.5%. Over the same period, the S&P 500 Index
and S&P 1500 Super Composite Index, which have exposure to large-, mid-, and
small-cap stocks, gained 8.6% and 9.6%, respectively.
Over the 12-month period ended May 31, 2006, an overweight position in energy
and basic materials shares, relative to the benchmarks, contributed to the
positive performance of the Fund. Over the period, these were the two best
performing sectors in the S&P 500 Index. An underweight position in health care
stocks, the worst performing sector of the benchmark, also contributed to the
positive performance of the Fund over the 12-month period. Fund performance was
hindered by an underweight position, relative to the benchmark, in financial
shares. Financial shares were among the best performers in the benchmarks,
returning 14.6% and 14.9% for the S&P 500 Index and S&P 1500 Super Composite
Index, respectively.
We are pleased that our strategy continues to outperform its benchmark indexes -
returning substantially more than the two benchmarks mentioned based on the
Fund's market price and net asset value. The market price of FVI closed at
$21.20 per share on May 31, 2006, above its $20.00 IPO price. Despite the strong
NAV performance of FVI, the Fund traded at a 10.5% discount to its NAV on May
31, 2006.
MARKET AND ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
Overall, for the year ended May 31, 2006, stock markets performed in line with
or above long-term averages, with particular strength in small and mid-cap
stocks. The S&P 500 (large-cap), S&P 400 (mid-cap), and S&P 600 (small-cap)
indexes increased, including dividends, with returns of 8.6%, 15.5% and 17.6%,
respectively, for the 12-month period ended May 31, 2006. After lagging behind
large cap stocks in the 1990s, small and mid-cap stocks have substantially
outperformed their large-cap counterparts so far this decade.
In our opinion, the equity market conditions remained favorable throughout most
of the period, with particular strength from late October 2005 through early May
2006, as economic conditions improved from the lower expectations brought about
by severe weather conditions in the Gulf Region. However, starting in early May
2006, stock markets began to experience meaningful weakness, particularly the
shares of those companies that had experienced the greatest increase in price
leading up to that point. May 2006 saw the S&P small and mid-cap stock indexes
decline by approximately 4.5%, considerably higher than the 2.5% decline for the
S&P 500 large-cap index.
The Federal Open Market Committee raised interest rates steadily during the
period from 3% to 5% due to increased inflation expectations. The inflation
rate, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, increased from 2.8% to 3.5% on an
annualized basis. Most of the increase in interest rates was likely due to the
strong recovery in capacity utilization and sharply higher commodity prices as
evidenced by the price of gold. According to Bloomberg, gold reached a 26-year
high of $732 an ounce on May 12, 2006.
Typically, higher interest rates put pressure on equity valuations and so the
positive performance of equities for the one-year period ended May 31, 2006 is
notable and can most likely be explained by strong earnings performance.
Earnings for the S&P 500 in the first quarter of 2006 were 19.4% higher than the
same period a year earlier, with 67.6% of companies beating consensus earnings
estimates. Consensus earnings estimates in April and May continued to increase
according to the Institutional Broker's Estimate System. The S&P 500 has posted
double-digit earnings growth for the past 16 consecutive quarters.
IN CLOSING
It is a bit unusual to see stock prices rise as strongly as they have over the
last year given higher interest rates. We believe the best explanation is that
profits have increased fast enough to offset the negative impact that rising
rates can have on equity valuations. As investors look to minimize the guesswork
associated with investing in stocks, multi-cap equity portfolios are rapidly
gaining in popularity. In 2005, multi-cap equity mutual funds reported net
inflows totaling $94.3 billion, up from $69.8 billion in 2004, according to
Lipper. The cash flows for the rest of the major categories in 2005, according
to Lipper, were as follows: Mid-Cap funds (+$19.3 billion); Small-Cap funds
(-$1.74 billion); and Large-Cap funds (-$106.2 billion). Multi-Cap funds are
sneaking up on Large-Cap funds in terms of total assets ($1.03 trillion vs.
$1.14 trillion). The First Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund
continues to provide a diversified portfolio for investors within a closed-end
fund seeking a multi-cap portfolio allocation.
Page 3
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO COMPONENTS+
MAY 31, 2006
[THE FOLLOWING TABLE WAS REPRESENTED BY A BAR CHART IN THE PRINTED MATERIAL.]
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 14.0%
Metals & Mining 7.4%
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 5.2%
Machinery 4.7%
Road & Rail 4.6%
Communications Equipment 4.1%
Media 3.1%
Computers & Peripherals 3.1%
Aerospace & Defense 2.9%
Electrical Equipment 2.7%
Personal Products 2.7%
Software 2.7%
IT Services 2.6%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure 2.6%
Diversified Telecommunication Services 2.5%
Specialty Retail 2.5%
Diversified Financial Services 2.3%
Food Products 2.1%
Multi-Utilities 2.0%
Capital Markets 2.0%
Chemicals 1.9%
Electronic Equipment & Instruments 1.8%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods 1.8%
Construction Materials 1.8%
Auto Components 1.8%
Insurance 1.7%
Household Durables 1.6%
Commercial Services & Supplies 1.5%
Wireless Telecommunication Services 1.3%
Household Products 1.2%
Life Sciences Tools & Services 0.8%
Industrial Conglomerates 0.8%
Airlines 0.7%
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITS) 0.7%
Energy Equipment & Services 0.7%
Pharmaceuticals 0.6%
Internet Software & Services 0.4%
Diversified Consumer Services 0.4%
Gas Utilities 0.4%
Internet & Catalog Retail 0.4%
Automobiles 0.4%
Health Care Providers & Services 0.3%
Distributors 0.3%
Trading Companies & Distributors 0.3%
Tobacco 0.3%
Leisure Equipment & Products 0.3%
+ Percentages are based on total investments. Please note that the
percentages shown on the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets.
Page 4 See Notes to Financial Statements.
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
MAY 31, 2006
MARKET
SHARES VALUE
----------- --------------
COMMON STOCKS - 99.5%
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE - 2.9%
9,706 Ceradyne, Inc.*................................. $ 423,861
30,427 Northrop Grumman Corp........................... 1,968,018
45,500 Raytheon Company................................ 2,086,175
--------------
4,478,054
--------------
AIRLINES - 0.7%
18,300 AMR Corp.*...................................... 451,278
10,350 British Airways PLC, Sponsored ADR*............. 661,675
--------------
1,112,953
--------------
AUTO COMPONENTS - 1.8%
27,466 Magna International, Inc. ...................... 2,131,087
24,387 Tenneco Automotive Inc.*........................ 581,386
--------------
2,712,473
--------------
AUTOMOBILES - 0.3%
11,178 Thor Industries, Inc. .......................... 537,438
--------------
CAPITAL MARKETS - 2.0%
14,896 Bear Stearns Companies (The), Inc............... 1,992,340
16,473 Eaton Vance Corp................................ 436,864
43,805 Knight Capital Group, Inc., Class A*............ 675,473
--------------
3,104,677
--------------
CHEMICALS - 1.9%
22,578 A. Schulman, Inc................................ 545,259
9,207 Ashland Inc..................................... 575,437
20,499 Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc. ............. 1,871,559
--------------
2,992,255
--------------
COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - 1.5%
58,116 Allied Waste Industries, Inc.*.................. 693,324
15,853 Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.*....... 559,928
8,053 HNI Corp........................................ 420,367
34,863 Steelcase Inc., Class A......................... 646,360
--------------
2,319,979
--------------
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT - 4.1%
130,603 3Com Corp.*..................................... 589,020
146,415 Alcatel SA, Sponsored ADR*...................... 1,942,927
21,325 Belden CDT Inc.................................. 678,775
95,324 Cisco Systems, Inc.*............................ 1,875,976
32,042 Polycom, Inc.*.................................. 691,787
111,726 Sycamore Networks, Inc.*........................ 493,829
--------------
6,272,314
--------------
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS - 3.1%
31,342 Palm, Inc.*..................................... 516,516
68,619 Seagate Technology*............................. 1,602,254
467,496 Sun Microsystems, Inc.*......................... 2,178,531
20,349 Western Digital Corp.*.......................... 414,102
--------------
4,711,403
--------------
See Notes to Financial Statements. Page 5
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS - (CONTINUED)
MAY 31, 2006
MARKET
SHARES VALUE
----------- --------------
COMMON STOCKS - CONTINUED
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - 1.8%
8,790 Eagle Materials Inc. ........................... $ 428,337
8,435 Florida Rock Industries, Inc. .................. 443,681
23,600 Vulcan Materials Company........................ 1,841,980
--------------
2,713,998
--------------
DISTRIBUTORS - 0.3%
12,625 Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc.*........... 509,040
--------------
DIVERSIFIED CONSUMER SERVICES - 0.4%
13,534 Education Management Corp.*..................... 581,285
--------------
DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES - 2.3%
48,817 JPMorgan Chase & Company........................ 2,081,557
28,000 Moody's Corp. .................................. 1,464,400
--------------
3,545,957
--------------
DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES - 2.5%
297,678 Qwest Communications International Inc.*........ 2,086,723
57,842 Verizon Communications, Inc. ................... 1,805,249
--------------
3,891,972
--------------
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT - 2.7%
13,649 Acuity Brands, Inc.............................. 544,595
17,262 Baldor Electric Company ........................ 513,890
20,017 General Cable Corp.*............................ 645,748
13,483 Regal-Beloit Corp. ............................. 646,240
26,717 Rockwell Automation, Inc. ...................... 1,824,237
--------------
4,174,710
--------------
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT & INSTRUMENTS - 1.8%
37,583 AVX Corp. ...................................... 615,234
22,786 Benchmark Electronics, Inc.*.................... 551,649
22,585 Brightpoint, Inc.*.............................. 482,872
32,540 Ingram Micro Inc., Class A*..................... 561,640
22,912 Orbotech Ltd.*.................................. 575,549
--------------
2,786,944
--------------
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES - 0.7%
10,282 Lone Star Technologies, Inc.*................... 498,677
10,870 Tidewater Inc................................... 551,326
--------------
1,050,003
--------------
FOOD PRODUCTS - 2.1%
63,702 Archer-Daniels-Midland Company.................. 2,648,092
23,000 Hain Celestial Group (The), Inc.*............... 590,410
--------------
3,238,502
--------------
GAS UTILITIES - 0.4%
16,390 Laclede Group Inc............................... 551,524
--------------
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES - 0.3%
9,695 LCA-Vision, Inc. ............................... 526,826
--------------
Page 6 See Notes to Financial Statements.
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS - (CONTINUED)
MAY 31, 2006
MARKET
SHARES VALUE
----------- --------------
COMMON STOCKS - CONTINUED
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE - 2.6%
18,583 Bob Evans Farms Inc............................. $ 518,280
32,623 CKE Restaurants, Inc............................ 547,088
11,542 Darden Restaurants, Inc......................... 408,702
52,223 International Game Technology .................. 1,944,262
16,875 Papa John's International, Inc.*................ 530,888
--------------
3,949,220
--------------
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES - 1.6%
24,201 Blyth, Inc...................................... 511,851
60,117 Koninklijke (Royal) Philips Electronics N.V. .. 1,900,298
--------------
2,412,149
--------------
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS - 1.2%
30,182 Clorox (The) Company............................ 1,907,201
--------------
INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES - 0.7%
9,444 McDermott International, Inc.*.................. 619,621
6,750 Sequa Corp., Class A*........................... 545,063
--------------
1,164,684
--------------
INSURANCE - 1.7%
123,904 Aegon N.V. ..................................... 2,067,958
13,049 Hanover Insurance Group (The), Inc.............. 617,870
--------------
2,685,828
--------------
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES - 0.4%
68,418 RealNetworks, Inc.*............................. 647,234
--------------
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL - 0.3%
19,750 Netflix Inc.*................................... 546,878
--------------
IT SERVICES - 2.6%
57,713 Accenture Ltd., Class A ........................ 1,624,621
74,442 Electronic Data Systems Corp.................... 1,825,318
36,318 MPS Group, Inc.*................................ 546,223
--------------
3,996,162
--------------
LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS - 0.3%
9,521 Polaris Industries, Inc. ....................... 423,970
--------------
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES - 0.8%
9,841 Dionex Corp.*................................... 530,036
17,300 Thermo Electron Corp.*.......................... 635,602
--------------
1,165,638
--------------
MACHINERY - 4.7%
14,725 Astec Industries, Inc.*......................... 508,601
25,712 Caterpillar, Inc................................ 1,875,690
16,233 CLARCOR, Inc.................................... 510,528
12,297 Crane Company................................... 494,093
5,730 Cummins, Inc. .................................. 631,503
11,734 Graco, Inc. ................................... 539,412
See Notes to Financial Statements. Page 7
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS - (CONTINUED)
MAY 31, 2006
MARKET
SHARES VALUE
----------- --------------
COMMON STOCKS - CONTINUED
MACHINERY - (CONTINUED)
6,007 Harsco Corp..................................... $ 486,687
11,736 Nordson Corp.................................... 547,484
8,590 Oshkosh Truck Corp. ............................ 453,982
10,383 Toro (The) Company.............................. 501,187
11,686 Trinity Industries, Inc. ....................... 728,505
--------------
7,277,672
--------------
MEDIA - 3.1%
66,826 EchoStar Communications Corp., Class A*......... 2,000,102
124,023 News Corp., Class A............................. 2,365,119
54,350 Radio One, Inc., Class D*....................... 398,386
--------------
4,763,607
--------------
METALS & MINING - 7.4%
47,700 AK Steel Holding Corp.*......................... 641,565
9,506 Allegheny Technologies, Inc. ................... 604,867
19,936 AMCOL International Corp. ...................... 538,870
50,308 BHP Billiton Ltd., Sponsored ADR................ 2,177,330
26,154 Commercial Metals Company....................... 643,650
23,619 Nucor Corp. .................................... 2,486,372
7,151 Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company............... 576,442
19,633 Ryerson Inc. ................................... 512,421
39,237 Stillwater Mining Company*...................... 538,724
31,267 Teck Cominco Ltd., Class B...................... 1,989,847
10,882 United States Steel Corp. ...................... 722,347
--------------
11,432,435
--------------
MULTI-UTILITIES - 2.0%
69,886 Duke Energy Corp................................ 1,972,183
24,083 Energy East Corp................................ 574,139
14,804 Wisconsin Energy Corp........................... 590,235
--------------
3,136,557
--------------
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS - 13.9%
38,662 Anadarko Petroleum Corp......................... 1,920,342
7,430 Berry Petroleum Company, Class A................ 461,403
7,422 CONSOL Energy Inc. ............................. 654,991
25,698 EOG Resources, Inc.............................. 1,687,331
30,718 Exxon Mobil Corp................................ 1,871,033
11,012 Frontier Oil Corp............................... 616,672
56,415 Imperial Oil Ltd................................ 2,045,044
27,984 Marathon Oil Corp............................... 2,100,199
21,634 Occidental Petroleum Corp. ..................... 2,143,713
22,064 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A., ADR .................. 1,916,258
52,573 Shell Canada Ltd. .............................. 1,910,574
102,066 Talisman Energy Inc. ........................... 1,876,994
36,500 Valero Energy Corp.............................. 2,239,275
--------------
21,443,829
--------------
Page 8 See Notes to Financial Statements.
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS - (CONTINUED)
MAY 31, 2006
MARKET
SHARES VALUE
----------- --------------
COMMON STOCKS - CONTINUED
PERSONAL PRODUCTS - 2.7%
66,327 Avon Products, Inc.............................. $ 2,102,566
48,796 Estee Lauder Companies (The), Class A .......... 1,997,708
--------------
4,100,274
--------------
PHARMACEUTICALS - 0.6%
7,423 Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.*..................... 391,192
31,309 King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.*..................... 556,674
--------------
947,866
--------------
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS) - 0.7%
24,277 New Plan Excel Realty Trust .................... 573,180
13,130 Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust ...... 489,749
--------------
1,062,929
--------------
ROAD & RAIL - 4.6%
12,717 Arkansas Best Corp.............................. 524,068
36,396 CSX Corp. ...................................... 2,435,620
39,579 Norfolk Southern Corp. ......................... 2,088,188
22,000 Union Pacific Corp. ............................ 2,041,600
--------------
7,089,476
--------------
SEMICONDUCTORS &
SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT - 5.2%
159,000 Applied Micro Circuits Corp.*................... 467,460
67,819 Cirrus Logic, Inc.*............................. 554,759
183,064 Conexant Systems, Inc.*......................... 536,378
42,800 Integrated Device Technology, Inc.*............. 613,752
20,009 Intersil Corp., Class A ........................ 536,441
10,804 Lam Research Corp.*............................. 483,911
80,346 NVIDIA Corp.*................................... 1,846,351
20,817 OmniVision Technologies, Inc.*.................. 609,938
184,979 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Company Ltd., Sponsored ADR ................. 1,751,751
35,521 Teradyn Inc.*................................... 553,062
--------------
7,953,803
--------------
SOFTWARE - 2.6%
46,038 Mentor Graphics Corp.*.......................... 578,698
65,372 Novell, Inc.* .................................. 505,326
38,760 RSA Security Inc.*.............................. 582,563
36,915 SAP AG, Sponsored ADR .......................... 1,942,836
63,200 TIBCO Software, Inc.*........................... 484,744
--------------
4,094,167
--------------
SPECIALTY RETAIL - 2.5%
15,204 Claire's Stores, Inc............................ 413,093
25,000 Dress Barn (The), Inc.*......................... 584,750
14,649 Guess?, Inc.* ................................. 607,348
9,162 Sherwin-Williams (The) Company.................. 443,166
76,150 TJX Companies (The), Inc. ...................... 1,805,517
--------------
3,853,874
--------------
See Notes to Financial Statements. Page 9
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS - (CONTINUED)
MAY 31, 2006
MARKET
SHARES VALUE
----------- --------------
COMMON STOCKS - CONTINUED
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS - 1.8%
10,030 Gildan Activewear Inc.*......................... $ 420,859
21,937 Nike Inc., Class B.............................. 1,761,760
15,208 Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. ...................... 539,124
--------------
2,721,743
--------------
TOBACCO - 0.3%
12,908 Universal Corp.................................. 475,789
--------------
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS - 0.3%
10,640 MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc., Class A.... 491,887
--------------
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES - 1.3%
62,677 American Tower Corp., Class A*.................. 1,941,107
--------------
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS............................. 153,498,286
--------------
(Cost $142,686,269)
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.5%....................... 153,498,286
(Cost $142,686,269)**
NET OTHER ASSETS & LIABILITIES - 0.5%........... 698,422
--------------
NET ASSETS - 100.0%............................. $ 154,196,708
==============
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Non-income producing security.
** Aggregate cost for federal income tax and financial reporting purposes.
ADR American Depository Receipt
Page 10 See Notes to Financial Statements.
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
MAY 31, 2006
ASSETS:
Investments, at value
(Cost $142,686,269) ........................................................................ $153,498,286
Cash .......................................................................................... 960,221
Prepaid expenses .............................................................................. 4,432
Receivables:
Investment securities sold ............................................................... 1,839,159
Dividends ................................................................................ 214,548
Interest ................................................................................. 3,440
------------
Total Assets ............................................................................. 156,520,086
------------
LIABILITIES:
Payables:
Investment securities purchased .......................................................... 2,006,613
License fees ............................................................................. 132,638
Investment advisory fees ................................................................. 87,881
Audit and legal fees ..................................................................... 39,537
Printing fees ............................................................................ 24,239
Administrative fees ...................................................................... 13,520
Custodian fees ........................................................................... 5,844
Accrued expenses .............................................................................. 13,106
------------
Total Liabilities ........................................................................ 2,323,378
------------
NET ASSETS .................................................................................... $154,196,708
============
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF:
Undistributed net investment income ...................................................... $ 94,546
Accumulated net realized gain on investments sold ........................................ 19,358,215
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and foreign currencies ........................ 10,812,015
Par value ................................................................................ 65,052
Paid-in capital .......................................................................... 123,866,880
------------
Total Net Assets ......................................................................... $154,196,708
============
NET ASSET VALUE, per Common Share (par value $0.01 per Common Share) .......................... $ 23.70
============
Number of Common Shares outstanding (unlimited number of Common Shares has been authorized) ... 6,505,236
============
See Notes to Financial Statements. Page 11
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2006
INVESTMENT INCOME:
Dividends (net of foreign withholding tax of $7,771) ........... $ 1,976,558
------------
Total investment income ................................... 1,976,558
------------
EXPENSES:
Investment advisory fees .................................. 1,023,710
License fees .............................................. 319,568
Administration fees ....................................... 157,494
Audit and legal fees ...................................... 62,740
Trustees' fees and expenses ............................... 39,224
Printing fees ............................................. 32,712
Transfer agent fees ....................................... 31,452
Custodian fees ............................................ 29,011
Other ..................................................... 47,153
------------
Total expenses ............................................ 1,743,064
Fees waived by the investment advisor ..................... (99,851)
------------
Net expenses .............................................. 1,643,213
------------
NET INVESTMENT INCOME .......................................... 333,345
------------
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS:
Net realized gain on:
Securities transactions ................................... 31,601,542
Foreign currency transactions ............................. 106
------------
Net realized gain on investments during the year ............... 31,601,648
------------
Net change in unrealized depreciation of:
Investments ............................................... (4,023,787)
Foreign currencies ........................................ (2)
------------
Net change in unrealized depreciation of investments
during the year .............................................. (4,023,789)
------------
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments ................ 27,577,859
------------
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS ........... $ 27,911,204
============
Page 12 See Notes to Financial Statements.
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
YEAR YEAR
ENDED ENDED
5/31/2006 5/31/2005
------------- --------------
OPERATIONS:
Net investment income ................................................................. $ 333,345 $ 230,420
Net realized gain on investments during the year ...................................... 31,601,648 16,621,050
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of investments during the year ... (4,023,789) 14,213,786
------------- -------------
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations .................................. 27,911,204 31,065,256
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM:
Net investment income ................................................................. (260,210) (130,104)
Net realized gains .................................................................... (28,818,195) --
------------- -------------
Total distributions to shareholders ................................................... (29,078,405) (130,104)
------------- -------------
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets ................................................. (1,167,201) 30,935,152
NET ASSETS:
Beginning of year ..................................................................... 155,363,909 124,428,757
------------- -------------
End of year ........................................................................... $ 154,196,708 $ 155,363,909
============= =============
Undistributed net investment income at end of year .................................... $ 94,546 $ 98,729
============= =============
See Notes to Financial Statements. Page 13
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
FOR A COMMON SHARE OUTSTANDING THROUGHOUT EACH PERIOD
YEAR YEAR PERIOD
ENDED ENDED ENDED
5/31/2006 5/31/2005 5/31/2004*
----------- ----------- -----------
Net asset value, beginning of period ............................ $ 23.88 $ 19.13 $ 19.10
----------- ----------- -----------
INCOME FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS:
Net investment income/(loss) .................................... 0.05 0.04 (0.01)
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments ................. 4.24 4.73 0.08
----------- ----------- -----------
Total from investment operations ................................ 4.29 4.77 0.07
----------- ----------- -----------
DISTRIBUTIONS PAID TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM:
Net investment income ........................................... (0.04) (0.02) --
Net realized gains .............................................. (4.43) -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total from distributions ........................................ (4.47) (0.02) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Common Shares offering costs charged to paid-in capital ......... -- -- (0.04)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net asset value, end of period .................................. $ 23.70 $ 23.88 $ 19.13
=========== =========== ===========
Market value, end of period ..................................... $ 21.20 $ 20.54 $ 17.20
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL RETURN BASED ON NET ASSET VALUE (A)+ ...................... 21.48% 24.96% 0.16%
=========== =========== ===========
TOTAL RETURN BASED ON MARKET VALUE (B)+ ......................... 26.33% 19.54% (14.00)%
=========== =========== ===========
RATIOS TO AVERAGE NET ASSETS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Net assets, end of period (in 000's) ............................ $ 154,197 $ 155,364 $ 124,429
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets ..................... 1.04% 1.05% 1.68%**
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets ................... 1.11% 1.13% 1.68%**
Ratio of net investment income/(loss) to average net assets ..... 0.21% 0.16% (0.52)%**
Portfolio turnover rate ......................................... 164% 163% 3%
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* The Fund commenced operations on April 16, 2004.
** Annualized.
(a) Total return based on net asset value is the combination of reinvested
dividend distributions and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any,
at prices obtained by the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, and changes in net
asset value per share and does not reflect sales load.
(b) Total return based on market value is the combination of reinvested
dividend distributions and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any,
at prices obtained by the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, and changes in
Common Share market price per share, all based on Common Share market
price per share.
+ Total return is not annualized for periods less than one year.
Page 14 See Notes to Financial Statements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
1. Fund Description
First Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund (the "Fund") is a
diversified, closed-end management investment company organized as a
Massachusetts business trust on February 20, 2004, and is registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The Fund trades under the ticker symbol FVI
on the American Stock Exchange.
The Fund's investment objective is to provide capital appreciation. The Fund
seeks to outperform the Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the
"S&P 500 Index") by investing in a diversified portfolio of the common stocks
selected through the application of a disciplined investment strategy
implemented by the Fund's investment advisor, First Trust Advisors L.P. ("First
Trust"). There can be no assurance that the Fund's investment objective will be
achieved.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently
followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A. PORTFOLIO VALUATION:
The Fund determines the net asset value ("NAV") of its shares daily, as of the
close of regular session trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"),
normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, on each day the NYSE is open for trading. The
NAV is computed by dividing the value of all assets of the Fund (including
accrued interest and dividends), less all liabilities (including accrued
expenses and dividends declared but unpaid), by the total number of shares
outstanding.
The Fund's investments are valued at market value or, in the absence of market
value with respect to any portfolio securities, at fair value according to
procedures adopted by the Fund's Board of Trustees. Portfolio securities listed
on any exchange other than the NASDAQ National Market ("NASDAQ") are valued at
the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is being
determined. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at
the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices on such day. Securities traded
on the NASDAQ are valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price as determined by
NASDAQ. Portfolio securities traded on more than one securities exchange are
valued at the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is
being determined at the close of the exchange representing the principal market
for such securities. Portfolio securities traded in the over-the-counter market,
but excluding securities traded on the NASDAQ, are valued at the closing bid
prices. Short-term investments that mature in less than 60 days are valued at
amortized cost.
Foreign securities traded outside the United States are generally valued as of
the time their trading is complete, which is usually different from the close of
the NYSE. Occasionally, events affecting the value of such securities may occur
between such times and the close of the NYSE that will not always be reflected
in such securities' value. If events materially affecting the value of such
securities occur during such period, these securities will be valued at their
fair value according to procedures adopted by the Fund's Board of Trustees. All
securities and other assets of the Fund denominated in foreign currencies will
be converted to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the time of
valuation.
B. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS AND INVESTMENT INCOME:
Securities transactions are recorded as of the trade date. Realized gains and
losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis.
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded
on the accrual basis.
Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis may be
settled a month or more after the trade date; interest income on such securities
is not accrued until settlement date. The Fund instructs the Custodian to
segregate assets of the Fund with a current value at least equal to the amount
of its when-issued purchase commitments.
C. FOREIGN CURRENCY:
The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign
currencies, investments and other assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period.
Purchases and sales of investment securities and items of income and expense are
translated on the respective dates of such transactions. Unrealized gains and
losses which result from changes in foreign currency exchange rates have been
included in "Net change in unrealized depreciation of foreign currencies" on the
Statement
Page 15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
of Operations. Net realized foreign currency gains and losses include the effect
of changes in exchange rates between trade date and settlement date on
investment security transactions, foreign currency transactions and interest and
dividends received. The portion of foreign currency gains and losses related to
fluctuation in exchange rates between the initial purchase trade date and
subsequent sale trade date is included in "Net realized gain on foreign currency
transactions" on the Statement of Operations.
D. DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS:
Dividends from net investment income, if any, of the Fund are declared and paid
semi-annually or as the Board of Trustees may determine from time to time.
Distributions of any net capital gains earned by the Fund are distributed at
least annually. Distributions will automatically be reinvested into additional
Common Shares pursuant to the Fund's Dividend Reinvestment Plan unless cash
distributions are elected by the shareholder.
Distributions from income and capital gains are determined in accordance with
income tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to
differing treatments of income and gains on various investment securities held
by the Fund, timing differences and differing characterization of distributions
made by the Fund. Permanent differences incurred during the year ended May 31,
2006, resulting in book and tax accounting differences, have been reclassified
at year end to reflect a decrease to undistributed net investment income by
$77,318 and an increase in accumulated net realized gain on investments by
$77,318. Net assets were not affected by this reclassification.
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended May 31,
2006 and May 31, 2005 is as follows:
Distributions paid from:
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Ordinary Income................................ $ 24,980,107 $ 130,104
Long-Term Capital Gains........................ $ 4,098,298 $ --
As of May 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were
as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income.................. $ 10,106,877
Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains ......... $ 9,346,075
Net Unrealized Appreciation.................... $ 10,812,015
E. INCOME TAXES:
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by
complying with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, and by distributing substantially all of its net investment
income and net realized gains to shareholders. Accordingly, no provision has
been made for federal or state income taxes.
Certain losses were incurred after October 31 within the Fund's fiscal year. For
tax purposes, these losses are considered to be realized on the first day of the
Fund's following fiscal year. For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, the Fund
incurred and elected to defer $191 in currency losses.
F. EXPENSES:
The Fund pays all expenses directly related to its operations. First Trust has
entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with Value Line(R) Publishing,
Inc. which allows for the use by First Trust of the Value Line(R)
Timeliness(TM), Safety(TM) and Technical(TM) Ranking Systems and certain
trademarks and trade names of Value Line(R) Publishing, Inc. The Fund is a
sub-licensee to this license agreement. In exchange, Value Line(R) Publishing,
Inc. receives an annual fee, payable on a quarterly basis, equal to 0.15% of the
Fund's gross daily assets. This license fee is paid by the Fund to First Trust,
which in turn pays Value Line(R) Publishing, Inc. The terms of the license
agreement provide that it will be automatically renewed for successive one year
terms unless either party elects not to renew the agreement.
First Trust has entered into a non-exclusive licensing and services agreement
and a related work order with Ibbotson Associates, Inc. ("Ibbotson") which
allows for the use by First Trust of the Ibbotson name for inclusion in the name
of the Fund and in connection with the promotion, offering, operation and
marketing of the Fund. In addition, Ibbotson performs certain other services for
First Trust under the terms of the agreement. In exchange, Ibbotson receives an
annual fee, payable quarterly, based upon the aggregate net assets under
management of the Fund. The annual fee is 0.05% of all assets under management
of the Fund, with a minimum annual fee of $50,000
Page 16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
for services rendered. The annual fee is paid by the Fund to First Trust, which
in turn pays Ibbotson. The terms of the agreement provide that it shall remain
in effect for a minimum of twenty-four (24) months from the date of execution of
the agreement unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the
agreement.
3. INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER AFFILIATED TRANSACTIONS
First Trust is a limited partnership with one limited partner, Grace Partners of
DuPage L.P., and one general partner, The Charger Corporation. First Trust
serves as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to an Investment Management
Agreement. First Trust is responsible for the ongoing monitoring of the Fund's
investment portfolio, managing the Fund's business affairs and certain
administrative services necessary for the management of the Fund. For these
services, First Trust is entitled to a monthly fee calculated at an annual rate
of 0.65% of the Fund's average daily net assets.
First Trust agreed to waive fees in an amount equal to 0.07% of the average
daily net assets of the Fund through April 27, 2006. Waivers are reported as
"Fees waived by the investment advisor" on the Statement of Operations.
PFPC Inc. ("PFPC"), an indirect, majority-owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc., serves as the Fund's Administrator and Transfer Agent in
accordance with certain fee arrangements. PFPC Trust Company, also an indirect,
majority-owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., serves as
the Fund's Custodian in accordance with certain fee arrangements.
The Fund pays each Trustee who is not an officer or employee of First Trust or
any of their affiliates ("Disinterested Trustees") an annual retainer of
$10,000, which includes compensation for all board and committee meetings. Until
December 31, 2005, additional fees of $1,000 and $500 were paid to Disinterested
Trustees for special board meetings and non-regular committee meetings,
respectively. These additional fees were shared by the funds in the First Trust
fund complex that participated in the particular meeting and are not per fund
fees. Trustees are also reimbursed for travel and out-of-pocket expenses in
connection with all meetings. Effective January 1, 2006, the Disinterested
Trustees are no longer paid additional fees for special board meetings and
non-regular committee meetings.
4. PURCHASES AND SALES OF SECURITIES
Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, excluding
short-term investments, for the year ended May 31, 2006, were $256,111,176 and
$284,432,023, respectively.
As of May 31, 2006, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all
securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost was $14,714,284,
and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which
there was an excess of tax cost over value was $3,902,267.
5. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 22, 2006, the Fund declared distributions totalling $1.27 per share which
represents a dividend from net investment income of $0.02 and short-term capital
gain of $1.25 to Common Shareholders of record June 5, 2006, payable June 15,
2006.
Page 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) &
IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of First
Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund (the "Fund"), including
the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2006, the related statement of
operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for
each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for
the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are
the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund
is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation
of securities owned as of May 31, 2006, by correspondence with the Fund's
custodian and broker. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Fund as of May 31, 2006, the results of its operations, the changes in its net
assets, and the financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
July 14, 2006
Page 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
If your Common Shares are registered directly with the Fund or if you hold your
Common Shares with a brokerage firm that participates in the Fund's Dividend
Reinvestment Plan (the "Plan"), unless you elect, by written notice to the Fund,
to receive cash distributions, all dividends, including any capital gain
distributions, on your Common Shares will be automatically reinvested by PFPC
Inc. (the "Plan Agent"), in additional Common Shares under the Plan. If you
elect to receive cash distributions, you will receive all distributions in cash
paid by check mailed directly to you by PFPC Inc., as dividend paying agent.
If you decide to participate in the Plan, the number of Common Shares you will
receive will be determined as follows:
(1) If Common Shares are trading at or above net asset value ("NAV") at
the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at a price
equal to the greater of (i) NAV per Common Share on that date or
(ii) 95% of the market price on that date.
(2) If Common Shares are trading below NAV at the time of valuation, the
Plan Agent will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and
will purchase Common Shares in the open market, on the American
Stock Exchange or elsewhere, for the participants' accounts. It is
possible that the market price for the Common Shares may increase
before the Plan Agent has completed its purchases. Therefore, the
average purchase price per share paid by the Plan Agent may exceed
the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the purchase
of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid
in Common Shares issued by the Fund. The Plan Agent will use all
dividends and distributions received in cash to purchase Common
Shares in the open market within 30 days of the valuation date
except where temporary curtailment or suspension of purchases is
necessary to comply with federal securities laws. Interest will not
be paid on any uninvested cash payments.
You may elect to opt-out of or withdraw from the Plan at any time by giving
written notice to the Plan Agent, or by telephone at (800) 331-1710, in
accordance with such reasonable requirements as the Plan Agent and Fund may
agree upon. If you withdraw or the Plan is terminated, you will receive a
certificate for each whole share in your account under the Plan and you will
receive a cash payment for any fraction of a share in your account. If you wish,
the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send you the proceeds, minus brokerage
commissions.
The Plan Agent maintains all Common Shareholders' accounts in the Plan and gives
written confirmation of all transactions in the accounts, including information
you may need for tax records. Common Shares in your account will be held by the
Plan Agent in non-certificated form. The Plan Agent will forward to each
participant any proxy solicitation material and will vote any shares so held
only in accordance with proxies returned to the Fund. Any proxy you receive will
include all Common Shares you have received under the Plan.
There is no brokerage charge for reinvestment of your dividends or distributions
in Common Shares. However, all participants will pay a pro rata share of
brokerage commissions incurred by the Plan Agent when it makes open market
purchases.
Automatically reinvesting dividends and distributions does not mean that you do
not have to pay income taxes due upon receiving dividends and distributions.
Capital gains and income are realized, although cash is not received by you.
Consult your financial advisor for more information.
If you hold your Common Shares with a brokerage firm that does not participate
in the Plan, you will not be able to participate in the Plan and any dividend
reinvestment may be effected on different terms than those described above.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan if in the judgment of
the Board of Trustees the change is warranted. There is no direct service charge
to participants in the Plan; however, the Fund reserves the right to amend the
Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants. Additional
information about the Plan may be obtained by writing PFPC Inc., 301 Bellevue
Parkway, Wilmington, Delaware 19809.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how
to vote proxies and information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to
portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is
available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling (800) 988-5891; (2) on
the Fund's website located at http://www.ftportfolios.com; and (3) on the
Securities and Exchange Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.
Page 19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for the first and third quarters of each fiscal
year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Forms N-Q are available (1) by calling (800)
988-5891; (2) on the Fund's website located at http://www.ftportfolios.com; (3)
on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov; and (4) for review and copying at
the SEC's Public Reference Room ("PRR") in Washington, DC. Information regarding
the operation of the PRR may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
TAX INFORMATION
Of the ordinary income (including short-term capital gain) distributions made by
the Fund during the year ended May 31, 2006, 69.59% qualify for the corporate
dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
The Fund hereby designates as qualified dividend income distributions 7.15% of
the ordinary income distributions (including short-term capital gain), for the
year ended May 31, 2006.
For the year ended May 31, 2006, the amount of long-term capital gain designated
by the Fund was $13,442,661, which is taxable at a maximum federal rate of 15%.
This designated amount may include distributions that are to be paid during the
fiscal year ended May 31, 2007.
BY-LAW AMENDMENTS
On December 12, 2005 and again on June 12, 2006, the Board of Trustees of the
Fund approved certain changes to the By-Laws of the Fund which may have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Fund. To receive a
copy of the revised By-Laws, investors may call the Fund at (800) 988-5891.
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
BOARD CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING CONTINUATION OF ADVISORY CONTRACT:
The Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the Investment Advisory
Agreement (the "AGREEMENT") between First Trust Advisors L.P. ("FIRST TRUST")
and First Trust/Value Line(R) & Ibbotson Equity Allocation Fund (the "FUND") at
a meeting held on March 13, 2006. The Board of Trustees determined that the
Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund and that the compensation
arrangement set forth in the Agreement is fair and reasonable in light of the
nature, extent and quality of the services provided by First Trust and such
other matters as the Trustees considered to be relevant in the exercise of their
reasonable business judgment.
To reach this determination, the Trustees considered their duties under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 ACT") as well as under the
general principles of state law in reviewing and approving advisory contracts;
the requirements of the 1940 Act in such matters; the fiduciary duty of
investment advisers with respect to advisory agreements and compensation; the
standards used by courts in determining whether investment company boards have
fulfilled their duties; and the factors to be considered by the Trustees in
voting on such agreements. The Independent Trustees received advice from
independent legal counsel. The Trustees also applied their business judgment to
determine whether the arrangement between the Fund and First Trust was a
reasonable business arrangement from the Fund's perspective as well as from the
perspective of its shareholders. In reviewing such arrangement, the Board of
Trustees considered factors such as the nature, quality and extent of services
provided by First Trust under the Agreement and the fairness of the fee charged,
whether the fee level reflects any economies of scale, and profitability
realized by First Trust under the Agreement.
The Trustees considered the nature, quality and extent of services provided by
First Trust, including the experience and skills of the personnel primarily
responsible for providing services to the Fund. The Board noted the compliance
program that had been developed by First Trust. In light of these considerations
and their overall familiarity with First Trust, the Trustees concluded that the
nature, quality and extent of services provided by First Trust to the Fund have
been and are expected to remain satisfactory.
The Trustees reviewed data prepared by Lipper Inc. ("LIPPER"), an independent
source, showing the advisory fee and expense ratio of the Fund compared to those
of a peer group of similar non-leveraged closed-end funds. The Trustees also
considered the Fund's advisory fee and expense ratio as compared to a second
peer group of similar funds, including three leveraged funds, as selected by
First Trust using data compiled by Lipper. The Trustees noted that First Trust
had agreed to waive its advisory fee in an amount equal to .07% of the average
daily net assets of the Fund through April 27, 2006 and that the Fund's advisory
fee and expense ratio with and without the waiver were near or below the median
of both the Lipper peer group and the First Trust-selected peer group. The
Trustees also considered the advisory fees paid to First Trust by other funds
with investment objectives and policies similar to the Fund's, noting that
Page 20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
those fees generally were similar, except for those funds for which First Trust
served as sub-adviser, for which the annual fee was lower. The Trustees noted
that First Trust told them that the nature of the services provided to those
clients may not be comparable to those provided to the Fund. The Trustees also
considered the Fund's performance for the one year and since-inception periods
ended December 31, 2005 as compared to that of other closed-end funds in the
peer group and performance universe selected by Lipper and the peer group and
performance universe selected by First Trust. In addition, the Trustees
considered the market price and net asset value performance of the Fund since
inception, and compared the Fund's discount as of December 31, 2005 to the
average and median discount of a peer group selected by an independent source,
noting that the Fund's discount was indicative of the asset class. The Trustees
noted the strong performance of the Fund over both periods as compared to the
peer groups and performance universes and concluded that the Fund's performance
was reasonable. On the basis of the information provided, the Trustees concluded
that the Fund's advisory fee was reasonable and appropriate in light of the
nature, quality and extent of services provided by First Trust.
The Trustees noted that First Trust has continued to invest in personnel and
infrastructure but had not identified any economies of scale realized by the
Fund and had indicated that, because the Fund is a closed-end fund that is not
issuing more shares other than pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan, First
Trust believed that any discussion of economies of scale was not meaningful. The
Trustees concluded that the advisory fee reflects an appropriate level of
sharing of any economies of scale. The Trustees also considered the costs of the
services provided and profits realized by First Trust from its relationship with
the Fund for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, as set forth in the
materials provided to the Board. The Trustees noted the inherent limitations in
the profitability analysis, and concluded that First Trust's profitability
appeared to be not unreasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered and discussed any ancillary benefits
derived by First Trust from its relationship with the Fund and noted that First
Trust receives no brokerage or soft dollars from the Fund and therefore the
typical fall out benefits are not present. The Trustees concluded that any other
fall out benefits received by First Trust or its affiliates would appear to be
attenuated.
Based on all of the factors considered, the Trustees concluded that it was in
the best interests of the Fund to approve the continuation of the Agreement,
including the fees to be charged for services thereunder. No single factor was
determinative in the Board's analysis.
Page 21
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS (UNAUDITED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
Information pertaining to the Trustees and officers* of the Fund is set forth
below.
NUMBER OF OTHER
PORTFOLIOS TRUSTEESHIPS/
NAME, D.O.B., ADDRESS AND TERM OF OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) IN FUND COMPLEX DIRECTORSHIPS
POSITION(S) WITH TRUST LENGTH OF TIME SERVED DURING PAST 5 YEARS OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE HELD BY TRUSTEE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard E. Erickson, Trustee o One year term Physician; President, 29 portfolios None
D.O.B. 04/51 o 2 years served Wheaton Orthopedics;
c/o First Trust Advisors L.P. Co-owner and Co-
1001 Warrenville Road Director, Sports Med
Suite 300 Center for Fitness;
Lisle, IL 60532 Limited Partner,
Gundersen Real Estate
Partnership
Thomas R. Kadlec, Trustee o One year term Vice President and Chief 29 portfolios None
D.O.B. 11/57 o 2 years served Financial Officer (1990
c/o First Trust Advisors L.P. to present); ADM
1001 Warrenville Road Investor Services, Inc.
Suite 300 (Futures Commission
Lisle, IL 60532 Merchant); Registered
Representative (2000 to
present), Segerdahl &
Company, Inc., an
NASD member (Broker-
Dealer); President,
ADM Derivatives, Inc.
(May 2005 to present)
Robert F. Keith+ o One year term President, Hibs 17 portfolios None
D.O.B. 11/56 o 1 month served Enterprises Financial and
c/o First Trust Advisors L.P. Management Consulting
1001 Warrenville Road, (2003 to Present);
Suite 300 Aramark Service Master
Lisle, IL 60532 Management (2001 to
2003); President and
Chief Operating Officer,
Service Master
Management Services
(1998 to 2003)
Niel B. Nielson, Trustee o One year term President, Covenant 29 portfolios Director of Good
D.O.B. 03/54 o 2 years served College (June 2002 to News Publishers-
c/o First Trust Advisors L.P. present); Pastor, College Crossway Books;
1001 Warrenville Road Church in Wheaton Covenant Transport,
Suite 300 (1997 to June 2002) Inc.
Lisle, IL 60532
Page 22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS (UNAUDITED) - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
NUMBER OF OTHER
PORTFOLIOS TRUSTEESHIPS/
NAME, D.O.B., ADDRESS AND TERM OF OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) IN FUND COMPLEX DIRECTORSHIPS
POSITION(S) WITH TRUST LENGTH OF TIME SERVED DURING PAST 5 YEARS OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE HELD BY TRUSTEE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James A. Bowen, Trustee o One year Trustee President, First Trust 29 portfolios Trustee of Wheaton
President, Chairman of the term and indefinite Advisors L.P. and First College
Board and CEO officer term Trust Portfolios L.P.;
D.O.B. 09/55 o 2 years served Chairman of the Board,
1001 Warrenville Road BondWave LLC
Suite 300 (software development
Lisle, IL 60532 company/Broker-Dealer)
and Stonebridge
Advisors LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark R. Bradley, Treasurer, o Indefinite term Chief Financial Officer, N/A N/A
Controller, Chief Financial o 2 years served Managing Director,
Officer, Chief Accounting First Trust Advisors L.P.
Officer and First Trust
D.O.B. 11/57 Portfolios L.P.; Chief
1001 Warrenville Road Financial Officer,
Suite 300 BondWave LLC and
Lisle, IL 60532 Stonebridge Advisors
LLC
Susan M. Brix o Indefinite term Representative, First N/A N/A
Assistant Vice President o 2 years served Trust Portfolios L.P.;
D.O.B. 01/60 Assistant Portfolio
1001 Warrenville Road Manager, First Trust
Suite 300 Advisors L.P.
Lisle, IL 60532
Robert F. Carey, o Indefinite term Senior Vice President, N/A N/A
Vice President o 2 years served First Trust Advisors L.P.
D.O.B. 07/63 and First Trust
1001 Warrenville Road Portfolios L.P.
Suite 300
Lisle, IL 60532
Page 23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS (UNAUDITED) - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
NUMBER OF OTHER
PORTFOLIOS TRUSTEESHIPS/
NAME, D.O.B., ADDRESS AND TERM OF OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) IN FUND COMPLEX DIRECTORSHIPS
POSITION(S) WITH TRUST LENGTH OF TIME SERVED DURING PAST 5 YEARS OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE HELD BY TRUSTEE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES -- (CONTINUED)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James M. Dykas o Indefinite term Vice President, First N/A N/A
Assistant Treasurer o 6 months served Trust Advisors L.P. and
D.O.B. 01/66 First Trust Portfolios
1001 Warrenville Road L.P. (January 2005 to
Suite 300 present); Executive
Lisle, IL 60532 Director, Van Kampen
Asset Management and
Morgan Stanley
Investment Management
(1999-2005)
W. Scott Jardine, Secretary o Indefinite term General Counsel, First N/A N/A
and Chief Compliance o 2 years served Trust Advisors L.P. and
Officer First Trust Portfolios
D.O.B. 05/60 L.P.; Secretary,
1001 Warrenville Road BondWave LLC and
Suite 300 Stonebridge Advisors
Lisle, IL 60532 LLC
Daniel J. Lindquist o Indefinite term Senior Vice President, N/A N/A
Vice President o 6 months served First Trust Advisors L.P.
D.O.B. 02/70 andFirst Trust Portfolios
1001 Warrenville Road L.P. (April 2004 to
Suite 300 present); Chief Operating
Lisle, IL 60532 Officer, Mina Capital
Management, LLC
(January 2004-April
2004); Chief Operating
Officer, Samaritan Asset
Management Services,
Inc. (April 2000-January
2004)
Kristi A. Maher o Indefinite term Assistant General N/A N/A
Assistant Secretary o 2 years served Counsel, First Trust
D.O.B. 12/66 Advisors L.P. and First
1001 Warrenville Road Trust Portfolios L.P.
Suite 300 (March 2004 to present);
Lisle, IL 60532 Associate, Chapman and
Cutler LLP (1995-2004)
Page 24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS (UNAUDITED) - (CONTINUED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
MAY 31, 2006
NUMBER OF OTHER
PORTFOLIOS TRUSTEESHIPS/
NAME, D.O.B., ADDRESS AND TERM OF OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) IN FUND COMPLEX DIRECTORSHIPS
POSITION(S) WITH TRUST LENGTH OF TIME SERVED DURING PAST 5 YEARS OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE HELD BY TRUSTEE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES -- (CONTINUED)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger F. Testin o Indefinite term Senior Vice President, N/A N/A
Vice President o 2 years served First Trust Advisors L.P.
D.O.B. 06/66 and First Trust
1001 Warrenville Road Portfolios L.P. (August
Suite 300 2001 to present);
Lisle, IL 60532 Analyst, Dolan Capital
Management (1998-
2001)
----------------------------------------------
* The term "officer" means the president, vice president, secretary,
treasurer, controller or any other officer who performs a policy making
function.
+ Effective June 12, 2006, the Board of Trustees of the Fund unanimously
appointed Robert F. Keith to the Board of Trustees and as a member of the
Fund's Audit Committee, Valuation Committee and Nominating and Governance
Committee.
Page 25
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
(a) The registrant, as of the end of the period covered by this report, has
adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions,
regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant
or a third party.
(c) There have been no amendments, during the period covered by this
report, to a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the
registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing
similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed
by the registrant or a third party, and that relates to any element of
the code of ethics description.
(d) The registrant has not granted any waivers, including an implicit
waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the
registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing
similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed
by the registrant or a third party, that relates to one or more of the
items set forth in paragraph (b) of this item's instructions.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
As of the end of the period covered by the report, the registrant's board of
trustees has determined that Thomas R. Kadlec is qualified to serve as an audit
committee financial expert serving on its audit committee and that he is
"independent," as defined by Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
(a) AUDIT FEES (REGISTRANT) -- The aggregate fees billed for each of the
last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the
principal accountant for the audit of the registrant's annual financial
statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for
those fiscal years are $27,975 for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005
and $27,600 for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2006.
(b) AUDIT-RELATED FEES (REGISTRANT) -- The aggregate fees billed in each of
the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the
principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of
the audit of the registrant's financial statements and are not reported
under paragraph (a) of this Item are $0 for the fiscal year ending May
31, 2005 and $0 for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2006.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES (INVESTMENT ADVISOR) -- The aggregate fees billed in
each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by
the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance
of the audit of the registrant's financial statements and are not
reported under paragraph (a) of this Item are $20,000 for the fiscal
year ending May 31, 2005 and $6,500 for the fiscal year ending May 31,
2006. These fees were for AIMR - PPS verification services.
(c) TAX FEES (REGISTRANT) -- The aggregate fees billed in each of the last
two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal
accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning are $3,500
for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005 and $3,675 for the fiscal year
ending May 31, 2006. These fees were for tax return preparation.
TAX FEES (INVESTMENT ADVISOR) -- The aggregate fees billed in each of
the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the
principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning
are $6,000 for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005 and $6,175 for the
fiscal year ending May 31, 2006. These fees were for tax return
preparation.
(d) ALL OTHER FEES (REGISTRANT) -- The aggregate fees billed in each of the
last two fiscal years ending May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2006 for products
and services provided by the principal accountant to the Registrant,
other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
Item were $0 and $3,258, respectively. These fees were for services
related to compliance program evaluation.
ALL OTHER FEES (INVESTMENT ADVISER) The aggregate fees billed in each
of the last two fiscal years ending May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2006 for
products and services provided by the principal accountant to the
Registrant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through
(c) of this Item were $35,450 and $77,927, respectively. These fees
were for services related to compliance program evaluation.
(e)(1) Disclose the audit committee's pre-approval policies and procedures
described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
Pursuant to its charter and its Audit and Non-Audit Services
Pre-Approval Policy adopted December 12, 2005, the Audit Committee (the
"COMMITTEE") is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit services and
permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be
performed for the Registrant by its independent auditors. The Chairman of the
Committee is authorized to give such pre-approvals on behalf of the Committee up
to $25,000 and report any such pre-approval to the full Committee.
The Committee is also responsible for the pre-approval of the
independent auditor's engagements for non-audit services with the Registrant's
adviser (not including a sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio
management and is sub-contracted or overseen by another investment adviser) and
any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the
investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, if the
engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the
Registrant, subject to the DE MINIMIS exceptions for non-audit services
described in Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. If the independent auditor has
provided non-audit services to the Registrant's adviser (other than any
sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is sub-contracted
with or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling,
controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides
ongoing services to the Registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to the DE
MINIMIS exception, the Committee will consider whether the provision of such
non-audit services is compatible with the auditor's independence.
(e)(2) The percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b)
through (d) for the Registrant and the Registrant's investment adviser
of this Item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to
the pre-approval exceptions included in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(c) or
paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X are as follows:
(b) 0%
(c) 0%
(d) 0%
(f) The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's
engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most
recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons
other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees
was less than fifty percent.
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant's accountant for
services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to the Registrant's
investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is
primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by
another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by,
or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services
to the Registrant for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005 and May 31,
2006 were $3,500 and $6,933 respectively for the Registrant and $61,450
and $90,602, respectively for the Registrant's investment adviser.
(h) Not applicable. The audit committee pre-approved all non-audit services
rendered to the Registrant's investment adviser and any entity
controlling, controlled by or under common control with the adviser
that provides ongoing services to the Registrant.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
The registrant has a separately designated audit committee consisting of all the
independent directors of the registrant. The members of the audit committee are:
Thomas R. Kadlec, Niel B. Nielson, Richard E. Erickson and Robert F. Keith.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of
the reporting period is included as part of the report to shareholders filed
under Item 1 of this form.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
The Proxy Voting Policies are attached herewith.
FIRST TRUST ADVISORS, L.P.
FIRST TRUST FUNDS
PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES
First Trust Advisors, L.P. (the "ADVISER") serves as investment adviser
providing discretionary investment advisory services for several open or
closed-end investment companies (the "FUNDS"). As part of these services, the
Adviser has full responsibility for proxy voting and related duties. In
fulfilling these duties, the Adviser and Funds have adopted the following
policies and procedures:
1. It is the Adviser's policy to seek to ensure that proxies for
securities held by a Fund are voted consistently and solely in the
best economic interests of the respective Fund.
2. The Adviser shall be responsible for the oversight of a Fund's
proxy voting process and shall assign a senior member of its staff
to be responsible for this oversight.
3. The Adviser has engaged the services of Institutional Shareholder
Services, Inc. ("ISS") to make recommendations to the Adviser on
the voting of proxies related to securities held by a Fund. ISS
provides voting recommendations based on established guidelines
and practices. The Adviser has adopted these ISS Proxy Voting
Guidelines.
4. The Adviser shall review the ISS recommendations and generally
will vote the proxies in accordance with such recommendations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Adviser may not vote in
accordance with the ISS recommendations if the Adviser believes
that the specific ISS recommendation is not in the best interests
of the respective Fund.
5. If the Adviser manages the assets or pension fund of a company and
any of the Adviser's clients hold any securities in that company,
the Adviser will vote proxies relating to such company's
securities in accordance with the ISS recommendations to avoid any
conflict of interest. In addition, if the Adviser has actual
knowledge of any other type of material conflict of interest
between itself and the respective Fund with respect to the voting
of a proxy, the Adviser shall vote the applicable proxy in
accordance with the ISS recommendations to avoid such conflict of
interest.
6. If a Fund requests the Adviser to follow specific voting
guidelines or additional guidelines, the Adviser shall review the
request and follow such guidelines, unless the Adviser determines
that it is unable to follow such guidelines. In such case, the
Adviser shall inform the Fund that it is not able to follow the
Fund's request.
7. The Adviser may have clients in addition to the Funds which have
provided the Adviser with discretionary authority to vote proxies
on their behalf. In such cases, the Adviser shall follow the same
policies and procedures.
Dated: September 15, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISS 2006 US PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES
SUMMARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[LOGO] ISS
INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
2099 GAITHER ROAD
SUITE 501
ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-4045
(301) 556-0500
FAX (301) 556-0486
WWW.ISSPROXY.COM
Copyright (C) 2005 by Institutional Shareholder Services.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher.
Requests for permission to make copies of any part of this work should be sent
to:
Institutional Shareholder Services
Marketing Department
2099 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850
ISS is a trademark used herein under license.
================================================================================
ISS 2006 PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES SUMMARY
EFFECTIVE FOR MEETINGS FEB 1, 2006
UPDATED DEC 19, 2005
The following is a condensed version of the proxy voting recommendations
contained in the ISS Proxy Voting Manual.
1. OPERATIONAL ITEMS ........................................................ 6
Adjourn Meeting ....................................................... 6
Amend Quorum Requirements ............................................. 6
Amend Minor Bylaws .................................................... 6
Change Company Name ................................................... 6
Change Date, Time, or Location of Annual Meeting ...................... 6
Ratifying Auditors .................................................... 6
Transact Other Business ............................................... 6
2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ...................................................... 7
Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections .................. 7
2006 Classification of Directors ...................................... 9
Age Limits ............................................................ 10
Board Size ............................................................ 10
Classification/Declassification of the Board .......................... 10
Cumulative Voting ..................................................... 10
Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection ......... 11
Establish/Amend Nominee Qualifications ................................ 11
Filling Vacancies/Removal of Directors ................................ 11
Independent Chair (Separate Chair/CEO) ................................ 11
Majority of Independent Directors/Establishment of Committees ......... 12
Majority Vote Shareholder Proposals ................................... 12
Office of the Board ................................................... 13
Open Access ........................................................... 13
Stock Ownership Requirements .......................................... 13
Term Limits ........................................................... 13
3. PROXY CONTESTS ........................................................... 14
Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections ................... 14
Reimbursing Proxy Solicitation Expenses ............................... 14
Confidential Voting ................................................... 14
4. ANTITAKEOVER DEFENSES AND VOTING RELATED ISSUES .......................... 15
Advance Notice Requirements for Shareholder Proposals/Nominations ..... 15
Amend Bylaws without Shareholder Consent .............................. 15
Poison Pills .......................................................... 15
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent ......................... 15
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings .......................... 15
Supermajority Vote Requirements ....................................... 15
5. MERGERS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURINGS ..................................... 16
Overall Approach ...................................................... 16
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2
================================================================================
Appraisal Rights ...................................................... 16
Asset Purchases ....................................................... 16
Asset Sales ........................................................... 17
Bundled Proposals ..................................................... 17
Conversion of Securities .............................................. 17
Corporate Reorganization/Debt Restructuring/Prepackaged Bankruptcy
Plans/Reverse Leveraged Buyouts/Wrap Plans ............................ 17
Formation of Holding Company .......................................... 17
Going Private Transactions (LBOs, Minority Squeezeouts, and
Going Dark) .......................................................... 18
Joint Ventures ....................................................... 18
Liquidations ......................................................... 18
Mergers and Acquisitions/ Issuance of Shares to Facilitate Merger
or Acquisition ....................................................... 18
Private Placements/Warrants/Convertible Debentures ................... 18
Spinoffs ............................................................. 19
Value Maximization Proposals ......................................... 19
6. STATE OF INCORPORATION .................................................. 20
Control Share Acquisition Provisions ................................. 20
Control Share Cash-out Provisions .................................... 20
Disgorgement Provisions .............................................. 20
Fair Price Provisions ................................................ 20
Freeze-out Provisions ................................................ 20
Greenmail ............................................................ 20
Reincorporation Proposals ............................................ 21
Stakeholder Provisions ............................................... 21
State Antitakeover Statutes .......................................... 21
7. CAPITAL STRUCTURE ....................................................... 22
Adjustments to Par Value of Common Stock ............................. 22
Common Stock Authorization ........................................... 22
Dual-Class Stock ..................................................... 22
Issue Stock for Use with Rights Plan ................................. 22
Preemptive Rights .................................................... 22
Preferred Stock ...................................................... 22
Recapitalization ..................................................... 23
Reverse Stock Splits ................................................. 23
Share Repurchase Programs ............................................ 23
Stock Distributions: Splits and Dividends ............................ 23
Tracking Stock ....................................................... 23
8. EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ...................................... 24
Equity Compensation Plans ................................................ 24
Cost of Equity Plans .................................................. 24
Repricing Provisions .................................................. 24
Pay-for Performance Disconnect ........................................ 24
Three-Year Burn Rate/Burn Rate Commitment ............................. 26
Poor Pay Practices .................................................... 27
Specific Treatment of Certain Award Types in Equity Plan Evaluations:..... 28
Dividend Equivalent Rights ............................................ 28
Liberal Share Recycling Provisions .................................... 28
Transferable Stock Option Awards ...................................... 28
Other Compensation Proposals and Policies ................................ 28
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans ......................................... 28
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3
================================================================================
Director Compensation ................................................. 28
Director Retirement Plans ............................................. 29
Disclosure of CEO Compensation-Tally Sheet ............................ 29
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) ................................ 30
Employee Stock Purchase Plans-- Qualified Plans ....................... 30
Employee Stock Purchase Plans-- Non-Qualified Plans ................... 31
Incentive Bonus Plans and Tax Deductibility Proposals (OBRA-Related ... 31
Compensation Proposals) ............................................... 31
Option Exchange Programs/Repricing Options ............................ 31
Stock Plans in Lieu of Cash ........................................... 32
Transfer Programs of Stock Options .................................... 32
Shareholder Proposals on Compensation .................................... 32
Disclosure/Setting Levels or Types of Compensation for Executives
and Directors ......................................................... 32
Option Expensing ...................................................... 33
Option Repricing ...................................................... 33
Pension Plan Income Accounting ........................................ 33
Performance-Based Awards .............................................. 33
Severance Agreements for Executives/Golden Parachutes ................. 33
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs) ....................... 33
9. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY ................................................. 34
Consumer Issues and Public Safety ........................................ 34
Animal Rights ......................................................... 34
Drug Pricing .......................................................... 34
Drug Reimportation .................................................... 34
Genetically Modified Foods ............................................ 34
Handguns .............................................................. 35
HIV/AIDS .............................................................. 35
Predatory Lending ..................................................... 35
Tobacco ............................................................... 36
Toxic Chemicals ....................................................... 36
Environment and Energy ................................................... 37
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ....................................... 37
CERES Principles ...................................................... 37
Concentrated Area Feeding Operations (CAFOs) .......................... 37
Environmental-Economic Risk Report .................................... 37
Environmental Reports ................................................. 37
Global Warming ........................................................ 37
Kyoto Protocol Compliance ............................................. 38
Land Use .............................................................. 38
Nuclear Safety ........................................................ 38
Operations in Protected Areas ......................................... 38
Recycling ............................................................. 38
Renewable Energy ...................................................... 38
Sustainability Report ................................................. 39
General Corporate Issues ................................................. 39
Charitable/Political Contributions .................................... 39
Link Executive Compensation to Social Performance ..................... 39
Outsourcing/Offshoring ................................................ 40
Labor Standards and Human Rights ......................................... 40
China Principles ...................................................... 40
Country-specific Human Rights Reports ................................. 40
International Codes of Conduct/Vendor Standards ....................... 40
MacBride Principles ................................................... 41
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4
================================================================================
Military Business ....................................................... 41
Foreign Military Sales/Offsets ....................................... 41
Landmines and Cluster Bombs .......................................... 41
Nuclear Weapons ...................................................... 41
Operations in Nations Sponsoring Terrorism (e.g., Iran) .............. 42
Spaced-Based Weaponization ........................................... 42
Workplace Diversity ..................................................... 42
Board Diversity ..................................................... 42
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) ................................... 42
Glass Ceiling ........................................................ 42
Sexual Orientation ................................................... 43
10. MUTUAL FUND PROXIES .................................................... 44
Election of Directors ................................................ 44
Converting Closed-end Fund to Open-end Fund .......................... 44
Proxy Contests ....................................................... 44
Investment Advisory Agreements ....................................... 44
Approving New Classes or Series of Shares ............................ 44
Preferred Stock Proposals ............................................ 44
1940 Act Policies .................................................... 44
Changing a Fundamental Restriction to a Nonfundamental Restriction ... 45
Change Fundamental Investment Objective to Nonfundamental ............ 45
Name Change Proposals ................................................ 45
Change in Fund's Subclassification ................................... 45
Disposition of Assets/Termination/Liquidation ........................ 45
Changes to the Charter Document ...................................... 45
Changing the Domicile of a Fund ...................................... 46
Authorizing the Board to Hire and Terminate Subadvisors Without
Shareholder Approval ................................................. 46
Distribution Agreements .............................................. 46
Master-Feeder Structure .............................................. 46
Mergers .............................................................. 46
Shareholder Proposals for Mutual Funds ..................................... 46
Establish Director Ownership Requirement ............................. 46
Reimburse Shareholder for Expenses Incurred .......................... 46
Terminate the Investment Advisor ..................................... 46
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5
================================================================================
1. OPERATIONAL ITEMS
ADJOURN MEETING
Generally vote AGAINST proposals to provide management with the authority to
adjourn an annual or special meeting absent compelling reasons to support the
proposal.
Vote FOR proposals that relate specifically to soliciting votes for a merger or
transaction if supporting that merger or transaction. Vote AGAINST proposals if
the wording is too vague or if the proposal includes "other business."
AMEND QUORUM REQUIREMENTS
Vote AGAINST proposals to reduce quorum requirements for shareholder meetings
below a majority of the shares outstanding unless there are compelling reasons
to support the proposal.
AMEND MINOR BYLAWS
Vote FOR bylaw or charter changes that are of a housekeeping nature (updates or
corrections).
CHANGE COMPANY NAME
Vote FOR proposals to change the corporate name.
CHANGE DATE, TIME, OR LOCATION OF ANNUAL MEETING
Vote FOR management proposals to change the date/time/location of the annual
meeting unless the proposed change is unreasonable.
Vote AGAINST shareholder proposals to change the date/time/location of the
annual meeting unless the current scheduling or location is unreasonable.
RATIFYING AUDITORS
Vote FOR proposals to ratify auditors, unless any of the following apply:
o An auditor has a financial interest in or association with the
company, and is therefore not independent,
o There is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered
an opinion which is neither accurate nor indicative of the company's
financial position, or
o Fees for non-audit services ("Other" fees) are excessive.
Non-audit fees are excessive if:
Non-audit ("other") fees >audit fees + audit-related fees + tax
compliance/preparation fees
Tax compliance and preparation include the preparation of original and amended
tax returns, refund claims and tax payment planning. All other services in the
tax category, such as tax advice, planning or consulting should be added to
"Other" fees. If the breakout of tax fees cannot be determined, add all tax fees
to "Other" fees.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals asking companies to prohibit or limit
their auditors from engaging in non-audit services.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals asking for audit firm rotation,
taking into account the tenure of the audit firm, the length of rotation
specified in the proposal, any significant audit-related issues at the company,
the number of Audit Committee meetings held each year, the number of financial
experts serving on the committee, and whether the company has a periodic renewal
process where the auditor is evaluated for both audit quality and competitive
price.
TRANSACT OTHER BUSINESS
Vote AGAINST proposals to approve other business when it appears as voting item.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6
================================================================================
2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
VOTING ON DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN UNCONTESTED ELECTIONS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on director nominees, examining, but not limited to, the
following factors:
o Composition of the board and key board committees;
o Attendance at board and committee meetings;
o Corporate governance provisions and takeover activity;
o Disclosures under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
o Long-term company performance relative to a market and peer index;
o Extent of the director's investment in the company;
o Existence of related party transactions;
o Whether the chairman is also serving as CEO;
o Whether a retired CEO sits on the board;
o Number of outside boards at which a director serves.
WITHHOLD from individual directors who:
o Attend less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings
without a valid excuse (such as illness, service to the nation, work
on behalf of the company);
o Sit on more than six public company boards;
o Are CEOs of public companies who sit on the boards of more than two
public companies besides their own-- withhold only at their outside
boards.
WITHHOLD from the entire board of directors, (excepting new nominees, who should
be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis) if:
o The company's poison pill has a dead-hand or modified dead-hand
feature. Withhold every year until this feature is removed;
o The board adopts or renews a poison pill without shareholder
approval since the beginning of 2005, does not commit to putting it
to shareholder vote within 12 months of adoption or reneges on a
commitment to put the pill to a vote and has not yet been withheld
from for this issue;
o The board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received
approval by a majority of the shares outstanding the previous year;
o The board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received
approval of the majority of shares cast for the previous two
consecutive years;
o The board failed to act on takeover offers where the majority of the
shareholders tendered their shares;
o At the previous board election, any director received more than 50
percent withhold votes of the shares cast and the company has failed
to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold rate;
o A Russell 3000 company underperformed its industry group (GICS
group). The test will consist of the bottom performers within each
industry group (GICS) based on a weighted average TSR. The
weightings are as follows: 20 percent weight on 1-year TSR; 30
percent weight on 3-year TSR; and 50 percent weight on 5-year TSR.
Company's response to performance issues will be considered before
withholding.
WITHHOLD from Inside Directors and Affiliated Outside Directors (per the
Classification of Directors below) when:
o The inside or affiliated outside director serves on any of the three
key committees: audit, compensation, or nominating;
o The company lacks an audit, compensation, or nominating committee so
that the full board functions as that committee;
o The full board is less than majority independent.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7
================================================================================
WITHHOLD from the members of the Audit Committee if:
o The non -audit fees paid to the auditor are excessive (see
discussion under Ratifying Auditors);
o A material weakness identified in the Section 404 Sarbanes-Oxley Act
disclosures rises to a level of serious concern; there are chronic
internal control issues and an absence of established effective
control mechanisms.
WITHHOLD from the members of the Compensation Committee if:
o There is a negative correlation between chief executive pay and
company performance (see discussion under Equity Compensation
Plans);
o The company fails to submit one-time transfers of stock options to a
shareholder vote;
o The company fails to fulfill the terms of a burn rate commitment
they made to shareholders;
o The company has poor compensation practices, which include, but are
not limited to:
- Egregious employment contracts including excessive severance
provisions;
- Excessive perks that dominate compensation;
- Huge bonus payouts without justifiable performance linkage;
- Performance metrics that are changed during the performance
period;
- Egregious SERP (Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans)
payouts;
- New CEO with overly generous new hire package;
- Internal pay disparity;
- Other excessive compensation payouts or poor pay practices at
the company.
WITHHOLD from directors, individually or the entire board, for egregious actions
or failure to replace management as appropriate.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8
================================================================================
2006 CLASSIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSIDE DIRECTOR (I)
o Employee of the company or one of its affiliates; 1
o Non-employee officer of the company if among the five most highly
paid individuals (excluding interim CEO);
o Listed as a Section 16 officer; 2
o Current interim CEO;
o Beneficial owner of more than 50 percent of the company's voting
power (this may be aggregated if voting power is distributed among
more than one member of a defined group).
AFFILIATED OUTSIDE DIRECTOR (AO)
o Board attestation that an outside director is not independent;
o Former CEO of the company;
o Former CEO of an acquired company within the past five years;
o Former interim CEO if the service was longer than 18 months. If the
service was between twelve and eighteen months an assessment of the
interim CEO's employment agreement will be made; 3
o Former executive of the company, an affiliate or an acquired firm
within the past five years;
o Executive of a former parent or predecessor firm at the time the
company was sold or split off from the parent/predecessor within the
past five years;
o Executive, former executive, general or limited partner of a joint
venture or partnership with the company;
o Relative 4 of a current employee of company or its affiliates;
o Relative 4 of former executive, including CEO, of company or its
affiliate within the last five years;
o Currently provides (or a relative provides) professional services
directly to the company, to an affiliate of the company or an
individual officer of the company or one of its affiliates;
o Employed by (or a relative is employed by) a significant customer or
supplier; 5
o Has (or a relative has) any transactional relationship with the
company or its affiliates excluding investments in the company
through a private placement; 5
o Any material financial tie or other related party transactional
relationship to the company;
o Party to a voting agreement to vote in line with management on
proposals being brought to shareholder vote;
o Has (or a relative has) an interlocking relationship as defined by
the SEC involving members of the board of directors or its
Compensation and Stock Option Committee; 6
o Founder 7 of the company but not currently an employee;
o Is (or a relative is) a trustee, director or employee of a
charitable or non-profit organization that receives grants or
endowments 5 from the company or its affiliates. 1
INDEPENDENT OUTSIDE DIRECTOR (IO)
o No material 8 connection to the company other than a board seat.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOOTNOTES:
1 "Affiliate" includes a subsidiary, sibling company, or parent company. ISS
uses 50 percent control ownership by the parent company as the standard
for applying its affiliate designation.
2 "Executives" (officers subject to Section 16 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934) include the chief executive, operating, financial,
legal, technology, and accounting officers of a company (including the
president, treasurer, secretary, controller, or any vice president in
charge of a principal business unit, division or policy function).
3 ISS will look at the terms of the interim CEO's employment contract to
determine if it contains severance pay, long-term health and pension
benefits or other such standard provisions typically contained in
contracts of permanent, non-temporary CEOs. ISS will also consider if a
formal search process was underway for a full-time CEO at the time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9
================================================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 "Relative" follows the NYSE definition of "immediate family members" which
covers: spouses, parents, children, siblings, in-laws, and anyone sharing
the director's home.
5 If the company makes or receives annual payments exceeding the greater of
$200,000 or five percent of the recipient's gross revenues. (The recipient
is the party receiving the financial proceeds from the transaction).
6 Interlocks include: (a) executive officers serving as directors on each
other's compensation or similar committees (or, in the absence of such a
committee, on the board) or (b) executive officers sitting on each other's
boards and at least one serves on the other's compensation or similar
committees (or, in the absence of such a committee, on the board).
7 The operating involvement of the Founder with the company will be
considered. Little to no operating involvement may cause ISS to deem the
Founder as an independent outsider.
8 For purposes of ISS' director independence classification, "material" will
be defined as a standard of relationship (financial, personal or
otherwise) that a reasonable person might conclude could potentially
influence one's objectivity in the boardroom in a manner that would have a
meaningful impact on an individual's ability to satisfy requisite
fiduciary standards on behalf of shareholders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGE LIMITS
Vote AGAINST shareholder or management proposals to limit the tenure of outside
directors through mandatory retirement ages.
BOARD SIZE
Vote FOR proposals seeking to fix the board size or designate a range for the
board size. Vote AGAINST proposals that give management the ability to alter the
size of the board outside of a specified range without shareholder approval.
CLASSIFICATION/DECLASSIFICATION OF THE BOARD
Vote AGAINST proposals to classify the board.
Vote FOR proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors
annually.
CUMULATIVE VOTING
Generally vote AGAINST proposals to eliminate cumulative voting. Vote
CASE-BY-CASE if the company has in place one of the three corporate governance
structures that are listed below.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to restore or permit cumulative voting. If one of
these three structures is present, vote AGAINST the proposal:
o the presence of a majority threshold voting standard;
o a proxy access provision in the company's bylaws or governance
documents; or
o a counterbalancing governance structure coupled with acceptable
relative performance.
The counterbalancing governance structure coupled with acceptable relative
performance should include all of the following:
o Annually elected board;
o Two-thirds of the board composed of independent directors;
o Nominating committee composed solely of independent directors;
o Confidential voting; however, there may be a provision for
suspending confidential voting during proxy contests;
o Ability of shareholders to call special meetings or act by written
consent with 90 days' notice;
o Absence of superior voting rights for one or more classes of stock;
o Board does not have the right to change the size of the board beyond
a stated range that has been approved by shareholders;
o The company has not under-performed its peers and index on a
one-year and three-year basis, unless there has been a change in the
CEO position within the last three years;
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10
================================================================================
o No director received WITHHOLD votes of 35% or more of the votes cast
in the previous election.
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION AND LIABILITY PROTECTION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals on director and officer indemnification and
liability protection using Delaware law as the standard.
Vote AGAINST proposals to eliminate entirely directors' and officers' liability
for monetary damages for violating the duty of care.
Vote AGAINST indemnification proposals that would expand coverage beyond just
legal expenses to acts, such as negligence, that are more serious violations of
fiduciary obligation than mere carelessness.
Vote FOR only those proposals providing such expanded coverage in cases when a
director's or officer's legal defense was unsuccessful if both of the following
apply:
o The director was found to have acted in good faith and in a manner
that he reasonably believed was in the best interests of the
company; and
o If only the director's legal expenses would be covered.
ESTABLISH/AMEND NOMINEE QUALIFICATIONS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals that establish or amend director qualifications.
Votes should be based on how reasonable the criteria are and to what degree they
may preclude dissident nominees from joining the board.
Vote AGAINST shareholder proposals requiring two candidates per board seat.
FILLING VACANCIES/REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
Vote AGAINST proposals that provide that directors may be removed only for
cause.
Vote FOR proposals to restore shareholders' ability to remove directors with or
without cause.
Vote AGAINST proposals that provide that only continuing directors may elect
replacements to fill board vacancies.
Vote FOR proposals that permit shareholders to elect directors to fill board
vacancies.
INDEPENDENT CHAIR (SEPARATE CHAIR/CEO)
Generally vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring the position of chair be
filled by an independent director unless there are compelling reasons to
recommend against the proposal, such as a counterbalancing governance structure.
This should include all of the following:
o Designated lead director, elected by and from the independent board
members with clearly delineated and comprehensive duties. (The role
may alternatively reside with a presiding director, vice chairman,
or rotating lead director; however the director must serve a minimum
of one year in order to qualify as a lead director.) At a minimum
these should include:
- Presides at all meetings of the board at which the chairman is
not present, including executive sessions of the independent
directors,
- Serves as liaison between the chairman and the independent
directors,
- Approves information sent to the board,
- Approves meeting agendas for the board,
- Approves meetings schedules to assure that there is sufficient
time for discussion of all agenda items,
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11
================================================================================
- Has the authority to call meetings of the independent
directors,
- If requested by major shareholders, ensures that he is
available for consultation and direct communication;
o Two-thirds independent board;
o All-independent key committees;
o Established governance guidelines;
o The company does not under-perform its peers.
MAJORITY OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS/ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMITTEES
Vote FOR shareholder proposals asking that a majority or more of directors be
independent unless the board composition already meets the proposed threshold by
ISS's definition of independence.
Vote FOR shareholder proposals asking that board audit, compensation, and/or
nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors if they
currently do not meet that standard.
MAJORITY VOTE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Generally vote FOR reasonably crafted shareholders proposals calling for
directors to be elected with an affirmative majority of votes cast and/or the
elimination of the plurality standard for electing directors (including binding
resolutions requesting that the board amend the company's bylaws), provided the
proposal includes a carve-out for a plurality voting standard when there are
more director nominees than board seats (e.g. contested elections).
Consider voting AGAINST the shareholder proposal if the company has adopted
formal corporate governance principles that present a meaningful alternative to
the majority voting standard and provide an adequate response to both new
nominees as well as incumbent nominees who fail to receive a majority of votes
cast.
Policies should address the specific circumstances at each company. At a
minimum, a company's policy should articulate the following elements to
adequately address each director nominee who fails to receive an affirmative of
majority of votes cast in an election:
o Established guidelines disclosed annually in the proxy statement
concerning the process to follow for nominees who receive majority
withhold votes;
o The policy needs to outline a clear and reasonable timetable for all
decision-making regarding the nominee's status;
o The policy needs to specify that the process of determining the
nominee's status will be managed by independent directors and must
exclude the nominee in question;
o An outline of a range of remedies that can be considered concerning
the nominee needs to be in the policy (for example, acceptance of
the resignation, maintaining the director but curing the underlying
causes of the withheld votes, etc.);
o The final decision on the nominee's status should be promptly
disclosed via an SEC filing. The policy needs to include the
timeframe in which the decision will be disclosed and a full
explanation of how the decision was reached.
In addition, the company should articulate to shareholders why this alternative
to a full majority threshold voting standard is the best structure at this time
for demonstrating accountability to shareholders. Also evaluate the company's
history of accountability to shareholders in its governance structure and in its
actions. In particular, a classified board structure or a history of ignoring
majority supported shareholder proposals will be considered at a company which
receives a shareholder proposal requesting the elimination of plurality voting
in favor of majority threshold for electing directors.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12
================================================================================
OFFICE OF THE BOARD
Generally vote FOR shareholders proposals requesting that the board establish an
Office of the Board of Directors in order to facilitate direct communications
between shareholders and non-management directors, unless the company has all of
the following:
o Established a communication structure that goes beyond the exchange
requirements to facilitate the exchange of information between
shareholders and members of the board;
o Effectively disclosed information with respect to this structure to
its shareholders;
o Company has not ignored majority supported shareholder proposals or
a majority WITHHOLD on a director nominee; and
o The company has an independent chairman or a lead/presiding
director, according to ISS' definition. This individual must be made
available for periodic consultation and direct communication with
major shareholders.
OPEN ACCESS
Generally vote FOR reasonably crafted shareholder proposals providing
shareholders with the ability to nominate director candidates to be included on
management's proxy card, provided the proposal substantially mirrors the SEC's
proposed two-trigger formulation (see the proposed "Security Holder Director
Nominations" rule (HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV/RULES/PROPOSED/34-48626.HTM) or ISS'
comment letter to the SEC dated 6/13/2003, available on ISS website under
Governance Center- ISS Position Papers).
STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS
Generally vote AGAINST shareholder proposals that mandate a minimum amount of
stock that directors must own in order to qualify as a director or to remain on
the board. While stock ownership on the part of directors is desired, the
company should determine the appropriate ownership requirement.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals asking that the company adopt a
holding or retention period for its executives (for holding stock after the
vesting or exercise of equity awards), taking into account any stock ownership
requirements or holding period/retention ratio already in place and the actual
ownership level of executives.
TERM LIMITS
Vote AGAINST shareholder or management proposals to limit the tenure of outside
directors through term limits. However, scrutinize boards where the average
tenure of all directors exceeds 15 years for independence from management and
for sufficient turnover to ensure that new perspectives are being added to the
board.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 13
================================================================================
3. PROXY CONTESTS
VOTING FOR DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN CONTESTED ELECTIONS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on the election of directors in contested elections,
considering the following factors:
o Long-term financial performance of the target company relative to
its industry;
o Management's track record;
o Background to the proxy contest;
o Qualifications of director nominees (both slates);
o Strategic plan of dissident slate and quality of critique against
management;
o Likelihood that the proposed goals and objectives can be achieved
(both slates);
o Stock ownership positions.
REIMBURSING PROXY SOLICITATION EXPENSES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to reimburse proxy solicitation expenses. When
voting in conjunction with support of a dissident slate, vote FOR the
reimbursement of all appropriate proxy solicitation expenses associated with the
election.
CONFIDENTIAL VOTING
Vote FOR shareholder proposals requesting that corporations adopt confidential
voting, use independent vote tabulators, and use independent inspectors of
election, as long as the proposal includes a provision for proxy contests as
follows: In the case of a contested election, management should be permitted to
request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the
dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents will not agree,
the confidential voting policy is waived.
Vote FOR management proposals to adopt confidential voting.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 14
================================================================================
4. ANTITAKEOVER DEFENSES AND VOTING RELATED ISSUES
ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS/NOMINATIONS
Votes on advance notice proposals are determined on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, giving
support to those proposals which allow shareholders to submit proposals as close
to the meeting date as reasonably possible and within the broadest window
possible.
AMEND BYLAWS WITHOUT SHAREHOLDER CONSENT
Vote AGAINST proposals giving the board exclusive authority to amend the bylaws.
Vote FOR proposals giving the board the ability to amend the bylaws in addition
to shareholders.
POISON PILLS
Vote FOR shareholder proposals requesting that the company submit its poison
pill to a shareholder vote or redeem it UNLESS the company has: (1) A
shareholder approved poison pill in place; or (2) The company has adopted a
policy concerning the adoption of a pill in the future specifying that the board
will only adopt a shareholder rights plan if either:
o Shareholders have approved the adoption of the plan; or
o The board, in its exercise of its fiduciary responsibilities,
determines that it is in the best interest of shareholders under the
circumstances to adopt a pill without the delay in adoption that
would result from seeking stockholder approval (i.e. the "fiduciary
out" provision). A poison pill adopted under this fiduciary out will
be put to a shareholder ratification vote within twelve months of
adoption or expire. If the pill is not approved by a majority of the
votes cast on this issue, the plan will immediately terminate.
Vote FOR shareholder proposals calling for poison pills to be put to a vote
within a time period of less than one year after adoption. If the company has no
non-shareholder approved poison pill in place and has adopted a policy with the
provisions outlined above, vote AGAINST the proposal. If these conditions are
not met, vote FOR the proposal, but with the caveat that a vote within twelve
months would be considered sufficient.
Vote CASE-by-CASE on management proposals on poison pill ratification, focusing
on the features of the shareholder rights plan. Rights plans should contain the
following attributes:
o No lower than a 20% trigger, flip-in or flip-over;
o A term of no more than three years;
o No dead-hand, slow-hand, no-hand or similar feature that limits the
ability of a future board to redeem the pill;
o Shareholder redemption feature (qualifying offer clause); if the
board refuses to redeem the pill 90 days after a qualifying offer is
announced, ten percent of the shares may call a special meeting or
seek a written consent to vote on rescinding the pill.
SHAREHOLDER ABILITY TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT
Vote AGAINST proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to take
action by written consent.
Vote FOR proposals to allow or make easier shareholder action by written
consent.
SHAREHOLDER ABILITY TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS
Vote AGAINST proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to call
special meetings.
Vote FOR proposals that remove restrictions on the right of shareholders to act
independently of management.
SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENTS
Vote AGAINST proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote.
Vote FOR proposals to lower supermajority vote requirements.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 15
================================================================================
5. MERGERS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURINGS
OVERALL APPROACH
For mergers and acquisitions, review and evaluate the merits and drawbacks of
the proposed transaction, balancing various and sometimes countervailing factors
including:
o VALUATION - Is the value to be received by the target shareholders
(or paid by the acquirer) reasonable? While the fairness opinion may
provide an initial starting point for assessing valuation
reasonableness, emphasis is placed on the offer premium, market
reaction and strategic rationale.
o MARKET REACTION - How has the market responded to the proposed deal?
A negative market reaction should cause closer scrutiny of a deal.
o STRATEGIC RATIONALE - Does the deal make sense strategically? From
where is the value derived? Cost and revenue synergies should not be
overly aggressive or optimistic, but reasonably achievable.
Management should also have a favorable track record of successful
integration of historical acquisitions.
o NEGOTIATIONS AND PROCESS - Were the terms of the transaction
negotiated at arm's-length? Was the process fair and equitable? A
fair process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders.
Significant negotiation "wins" can also signify the deal makers'
competency. The comprehensiveness of the sales process (e.g., full
auction, partial auction, no auction) can also affect shareholder
value.
o CONFLICTS OF INTEREST - Are insiders benefiting from the transaction
disproportionately and inappropriately as compared to non-insider
shareholders? As the result of potential conflicts, the directors
and officers of the company may be more likely to vote to approve a
merger than if they did not hold these interests. Consider whether
these interests may have influenced these directors and officers to
support or recommend the merger. The CIC figure presented in the
"ISS Transaction Summary" section of this report is an aggregate
figure that can in certain cases be a misleading indicator of the
true value transfer from shareholders to insiders. Where such figure
appears to be excessive, analyze the underlying assumptions to
determine whether a potential conflict exists.
o GOVERNANCE - Will the combined company have a better or worse
governance profile than the current governance profiles of the
respective parties to the transaction? If the governance profile is
to change for the worse, the burden is on the company to prove that
other issues (such as valuation) outweigh any deterioration in
governance.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Vote FOR proposals to restore, or provide shareholders with, rights of
appraisal.
ASSET PURCHASES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on asset purchase proposals, considering the following
factors:
o Purchase price;
o Fairness opinion;
o Financial and strategic benefits;
o How the deal was negotiated;
o Conflicts of interest;
o Other alternatives for the business;
o Non-completion risk.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16
================================================================================
ASSET SALES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on asset sales, considering the following factors:
o Impact on the balance sheet/working capital;
o Potential elimination of diseconomies;
o Anticipated financial and operating benefits;
o Anticipated use of funds;
o Value received for the asset;
o Fairness opinion;
o How the deal was negotiated;
o Conflicts of interest.
BUNDLED PROPOSALS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on bundled or "conditional" proxy proposals. In the case of
items that are conditioned upon each other, examine the benefits and costs of
the packaged items. In instances when the joint effect of the conditioned items
is not in shareholders' best interests, vote AGAINST the proposals. If the
combined effect is positive, support such proposals.
CONVERSION OF SECURITIES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals regarding conversion of securities. When
evaluating these proposals the investor should review the dilution to existing
shareholders, the conversion price relative to market value, financial issues,
control issues, termination penalties, and conflicts of interest.
Vote FOR the conversion if it is expected that the company will be subject to
onerous penalties or will be forced to file for bankruptcy if the transaction is
not approved.
CORPORATE REORGANIZATION/DEBT RESTRUCTURING/PREPACKAGED BANKRUPTCY PLANS/REVERSE
LEVERAGED BUYOUTS/WRAP PLANS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to
issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan, taking into consideration the
following:
o Dilution to existing shareholders' position;
o Terms of the offer;
o Financial issues;
o Management's efforts to pursue other alternatives;
o Control issues;
o Conflicts of interest.
Vote FOR the debt restructuring if it is expected that the company will file for
bankruptcy if the transaction is not approved.
FORMATION OF HOLDING COMPANY
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals regarding the formation of a holding company,
taking into consideration the following:
o The reasons for the change;
o Any financial or tax benefits;
o Regulatory benefits;
o Increases in capital structure;
o Changes to the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the company.
Absent compelling financial reasons to recommend the transaction, vote
AGAINST the formation of a holding company if the transaction would
include either of the following:
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17
================================================================================
o Increases in common or preferred stock in excess of the allowable
maximum (see discussion under "Capital Structure");
o Adverse changes in shareholder rights.
GOING PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS (LBOS, MINORITY SQUEEZEOUTS, AND GOING DARK)
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on going private transactions, taking into account the
following: offer price/premium, fairness opinion, how the deal was negotiated,
conflicts of interest, other alternatives/offers considered, and non-completion
risk.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on "going dark" transactions, determining whether the
transaction enhances shareholder value by taking into consideration:
o Whether the company has attained benefits from being publicly-traded
(examination of trading volume, liquidity, and market research of
the stock);
o Cash-out value;
o Whether the interests of continuing and cashed-out shareholders are
balanced; and
o The market reaction to public announcement of transaction.
JOINT VENTURES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to form joint ventures, taking into account the
following:
o Percentage of assets/business contributed;
o Percentage ownership;
o Financial and strategic benefits;
o Governance structure;
o Conflicts of interest;
o Other alternatives;
o Noncompletion risk.
LIQUIDATIONS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on liquidations, taking into account the following:
o Management's efforts to pursue other alternatives;
o Appraisal value of assets; and
o The compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.
Vote FOR the liquidation if the company will file for bankruptcy if the proposal
is not approved.
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS/ ISSUANCE OF SHARES TO FACILITATE MERGER OR ACQUISITION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on mergers and acquisitions, determining whether the
transaction enhances shareholder value by giving consideration to items listed
under "Mergers and Corporate Restructurings: Overall Approach."
PRIVATE PLACEMENTS/WARRANTS/CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals regarding private placements, taking into
consideration:
o Dilution to existing shareholders' position;
o Terms of the offer;
o Financial issues;
o Management's efforts to pursue other alternatives;
o Control issues;
o Conflicts of interest.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 18
================================================================================
Vote FOR the private placement if it is expected that the company will file for
bankruptcy if the transaction is not approved.
SPINOFFS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on spin-offs, considering:
o Tax and regulatory advantages;
o Planned use of the sale proceeds;
o Valuation of spinoff;
o Fairness opinion;
o Benefits to the parent company;
o Conflicts of interest;
o Managerial incentives;
o Corporate governance changes;
o Changes in the capital structure.
VALUE MAXIMIZATION PROPOSALS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals seeking to maximize shareholder value
by hiring a financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives, selling the
company or liquidating the company and distributing the proceeds to
shareholders. These proposals should be evaluated based on the following
factors:
o Prolonged poor performance with no turnaround in sight;
o Signs of entrenched board and management;
o Strategic plan in place for improving value;
o Likelihood of receiving reasonable value in a sale or dissolution;
and
o Whether company is actively exploring its strategic options,
including retaining a financial advisor.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 19
================================================================================
6. STATE OF INCORPORATION
CONTROL SHARE ACQUISITION PROVISIONS
Control share acquisition statutes function by denying shares their voting
rights when they contribute to ownership in excess of certain thresholds. Voting
rights for those shares exceeding ownership limits may only be restored by
approval of either a majority or supermajority of disinterested shares. Thus,
control share acquisition statutes effectively require a hostile bidder to put
its offer to a shareholder vote or risk voting disenfranchisement if the bidder
continues buying up a large block of shares.
Vote FOR proposals to opt out of control share acquisition statutes unless doing
so would enable the completion of a takeover that would be detrimental to
shareholders.
Vote AGAINST proposals to amend the charter to include control share acquisition
provisions.
Vote FOR proposals to restore voting rights to the control shares.
CONTROL SHARE CASH-OUT PROVISIONS
Control share cash-out statutes give dissident shareholders the right to
"cash-out" of their position in a company at the expense of the shareholder who
has taken a control position. In other words, when an investor crosses a preset
threshold level, remaining shareholders are given the right to sell their shares
to the acquirer, who must buy them at the highest acquiring price.
Vote FOR proposals to opt out of control share cash-out statutes.
DISGORGEMENT PROVISIONS
Disgorgement provisions require an acquirer or potential acquirer of more than a
certain percentage of a company's stock to disgorge, or pay back, to the company
any profits realized from the sale of that company's stock purchased 24 months
before achieving control status. All sales of company stock by the acquirer
occurring within a certain period of time (between 18 months and 24 months)
prior to the investor's gaining control status are subject to these
recapture-of-profits provisions.
Vote FOR proposals to opt out of state disgorgement provisions.
FAIR PRICE PROVISIONS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to adopt fair price provisions (provisions that
stipulate that an acquirer must pay the same price to acquire all shares as it
paid to acquire the control shares), evaluating factors such as the vote
required to approve the proposed acquisition, the vote required to repeal the
fair price provision, and the mechanism for determining the fair price.
Generally, vote AGAINST fair price provisions with shareholder vote requirements
greater than a majority of disinterested shares.
FREEZE-OUT PROVISIONS
Vote FOR proposals to opt out of state freeze-out provisions. Freeze-out
provisions force an investor who surpasses a certain ownership threshold in a
company to wait a specified period of time before gaining control of the
company.
GREENMAIL
Greenmail payments are targeted share repurchases by management of company stock
from individuals or groups seeking control of the company. Since only the
hostile party receives
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 20
================================================================================
payment, usually at a substantial premium over the market value of its shares,
the practice discriminates against all other shareholders.
Vote FOR proposals to adopt anti-greenmail charter or bylaw amendments or
otherwise restrict a company's ability to make greenmail payments.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on anti-greenmail proposals when they are bundled with other
charter or bylaw amendments.
REINCORPORATION PROPOSALS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to change a company's state of incorporation,
taking into consideration both financial and corporate governance concerns,
including the reasons for reincorporating, a comparison of the governance
provisions, comparative economic benefits, and a comparison of the
jurisdictional laws.
Vote FOR re-incorporation when the economic factors outweigh any neutral or
negative governance changes.
STAKEHOLDER PROVISIONS
Vote AGAINST proposals that ask the board to consider non-shareholder
constituencies or other non-financial effects when evaluating a merger or
business combination.
STATE ANTITAKEOVER STATUTES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes
(including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes,
freezeout provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill
endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions, anti-greenmail
provisions, and disgorgement provisions).
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 21
================================================================================
7. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
ADJUSTMENTS TO PAR VALUE OF COMMON STOCK
Vote FOR management proposals to reduce the par value of common stock.
COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZATION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock
authorized for issuance using a model developed by ISS.
Vote FOR proposals to approve increases beyond the allowable increase when a
company's shares are in danger of being delisted or if a company's ability to
continue to operate as a going concern is uncertain.
In addition, for capital requests less than or equal to 300 percent of the
current authorized shares that marginally fail the calculated allowable cap
(i.e., exceed the allowable cap by no more than 5 percent), on a CASE-BY-CASE
basis, vote FOR the increase based on the company's performance and whether the
company's ongoing use of shares has shown prudence. Factors should include, at a
minimum, the following:
o Rationale;
o Good performance with respect to peers and index on a five-year
total shareholder return basis;
o Absence of non-shareholder approved poison pill;
o Reasonable equity compensation burn rate;
o No non-shareholder approved pay plans; and
o Absence of egregious equity compensation practices.
DUAL-CLASS STOCK
Vote AGAINST proposals to create a new class of common stock with superior
voting rights.
Vote AGAINST proposals at companies with dual-class capital structures to
increase the number of authorized shares of the class of stock that has superior
voting rights.
Vote FOR proposals to create a new class of nonvoting or sub-voting common stock
if:
o It is intended for financing purposes with minimal or no dilution to
current shareholders;
o It is not designed to preserve the voting power of an insider or
significant shareholder.
ISSUE STOCK FOR USE WITH RIGHTS PLAN
Vote AGAINST proposals that increase authorized common stock for the explicit
purpose of implementing a non-shareholder approved shareholder rights plan
(poison pill).
PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals that seek preemptive rights, taking
into consideration: the size of a company, the characteristics of its
shareholder base, and the liquidity of the stock.
PREFERRED STOCK
Vote AGAINST proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred
stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend distribution, and other
rights ("blank check" preferred stock).
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 22
================================================================================
Vote FOR proposals to create "declawed" blank check preferred stock (stock that
cannot be used as a takeover defense).
Vote FOR proposals to authorize preferred stock in cases where the company
specifies the voting, dividend, conversion, and other rights of such stock and
the terms of the preferred stock appear reasonable.
Vote AGAINST proposals to increase the number of blank check preferred stock
authorized for issuance when no shares have been issued or reserved for a
specific purpose.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to increase the number of blank check preferred
shares after analyzing the number of preferred shares available for issue given
a company's industry and performance in terms of shareholder returns.
RECAPITALIZATION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on recapitalizations (reclassifications of securities), taking
into account the following:
o More simplified capital structure;
o Enhanced liquidity;
o Fairness of conversion terms;
o Impact on voting power and dividends;
o Reasons for the reclassification;
o Conflicts of interest; and
o Other alternatives considered.
REVERSE STOCK SPLITS
Vote FOR management proposals to implement a reverse stock split when the number
of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced.
Vote FOR management proposals to implement a reverse stock split to avoid
delisting.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to implement a reverse stock split that do not
proportionately reduce the number of shares authorized for issue based on the
allowable increased calculated using the Capital Structure model.
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAMS
Vote FOR management proposals to institute open-market share repurchase plans in
which all shareholders may participate on equal terms.
STOCK DISTRIBUTIONS: SPLITS AND DIVIDENDS
Vote FOR management proposals to increase the common share authorization for a
stock split or share dividend, provided that the increase in authorized shares
would not result in an excessive number of shares available for issuance as
determined using a model developed by ISS.
TRACKING STOCK
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on the creation of tracking stock, weighing the strategic
value of the transaction against such factors as:
o Adverse governance changes;
o Excessive increases in authorized capital stock;
o Unfair method of distribution;
o Diminution of voting rights;
o Adverse conversion features;
o Negative impact on stock option plans; and
o Alternatives such as spin-off.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 23
================================================================================
8. EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on equity-based compensation plans. Vote AGAINST the equity
plan if any of the following factors apply:
o The total cost of the company's equity plans is unreasonable;
o The plan expressly permits the repricing of stock options without
prior shareholder approval;
o There is a disconnect between CEO pay and the company's performance;
o The company's three year burn rate exceeds the greater of 2% and the
mean plus 1 standard deviation of its industry group; or
o The plan is a vehicle for poor pay practices.
Each of these factors is further described below:
COST OF EQUITY PLANS
Generally, vote AGAINST equity plans if the cost is unreasonable. For
non-employee director plans, vote FOR the plan if certain factors are met (see
Director Compensation section).
The cost of the equity plans is expressed as Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT),
which is measured using a binomial option pricing model that assesses the amount
of shareholders' equity flowing out of the company to employees and directors.
SVT is expressed as both a dollar amount and as a percentage of market value,
and includes the new shares proposed, shares available under existing plans, and
shares granted but unexercised. All award types are valued. For omnibus plans,
unless limitations are placed on the most expensive types of awards (for
example, full value awards), the assumption is made that all awards to be
granted will be the most expensive types. See discussion of specific types of
awards.
The Shareholder Value Transfer is reasonable if it falls below the
company-specific allowable cap. The allowable cap is determined as follows: The
top quartile performers in each industry group (using the Global Industry
Classification Standard GICS) are identified. Benchmark SVT levels for each
industry are established based on these top performers' historic SVT. Regression
analyses are run on each industry group to identify the variables most strongly
correlated to SVT. The benchmark industry SVT level is then adjusted upwards or
downwards for the specific company by plugging the company-specific performance
measures, size and cash compensation into the industry cap equations to arrive
at the company's allowable cap.
REPRICING PROVISIONS
Vote AGAINST plans that expressly permit the repricing of stock options without
prior shareholder approval, even if the cost of the plan is reasonable.
Vote AGAINST plans if the company has a history of repricing options without
shareholder approval, and the applicable listing standards would not preclude
them from doing so.
PAY-FOR PERFORMANCE DISCONNECT
Generally vote AGAINST plans in which:
o there is a disconnect between the CEO's pay and company performance
(an increase in pay and a decrease in performance);
o the main source of the pay increase (over half) is equity-based, and
o the CEO is a participant of the equity proposal.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 24
================================================================================
Performance decreases are based on negative one- and three-year total
shareholder returns. CEO pay increases are based on the CEO's total direct
compensation (salary, cash bonus, present value of stock options, face value of
restricted stock, face value of long-term incentive plan payouts, and all other
compensation) increasing over the previous year.
WITHHOLD votes from the Compensation Committee members when the company has a
pay for performance disconnect.
On a CASE-BY-CASE basis, vote for equity plans and FOR compensation committee
members with a pay-for-performance disconnect if compensation committee members
can present strong and compelling evidence of improved committee performance.
This evidence must go beyond the usual compensation committee report disclosure.
This additional evidence necessary includes all of the following:
o The compensation committee has reviewed all components of the CEO's
compensation, including the following:
- Base salary, bonus, long-term incentives;
- Accumulative realized and unrealized stock option and
restricted stock gains;
- Dollar value of perquisites and other personal benefits
to the CEO and the total cost to the company;
- Earnings and accumulated payment obligations under the
company's nonqualified deferred compensation program;
- Actual projected payment obligations under the company's
supplemental executive retirement plan (SERPs).
A tally sheet setting forth all the above components was prepared and reviewed
affixing dollar amounts under the various payout scenarios. (A complete
breakdown of pay components also can be found in Disclosure of CEO Compensation
- Tally Sheet.)
o A tally sheet with all the above components should be disclosed for
the following termination scenarios:
- Payment if termination occurs within 12 months: $_____;
- Payment if "not for cause" termination occurs within 12
months: $_____;
- Payment if "change of control" termination occurs within
12 months: $_____.
o The compensation committee is committed to providing additional
information on the named executives' annual cash bonus program
and/or long-term incentive cash plan for the current fiscal year.
The compensation committee will provide full disclosure of the
qualitative and quantitative performance criteria and hurdle rates
used to determine the payouts of the cash program. From this
disclosure, shareholders will know the minimum level of performance
required for any cash bonus to be delivered, as well as the maximum
cash bonus payable for superior performance.
The repetition of the compensation committee report does not meet ISS'
requirement of compelling and strong evidence of improved disclosure. The level
of transparency and disclosure is at the highest level where shareholders can
understand the mechanics of the annual cash bonus and/or long-term incentive
cash plan based on the additional disclosure.
o The compensation committee is committed to granting a substantial
portion of performance-based equity awards to the named executive
officers. A substantial portion of performance-based awards would be
at least 50 percent of the shares awarded to each of the named
executive officers. Performance-based equity awards are earned or
paid out based on the achievement of company performance targets.
The company will disclose the details of the performance criteria
(e.g., return on equity) and the hurdle
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 25
================================================================================
rates (e.g., 15 percent) associated with the performance targets.
From this disclosure, shareholders will know the minimum level of
performance required for any equity grants to be made. The
performance-based equity awards do not refer to non-qualified stock
options 1 or performance-accelerated grants. 2 Instead,
performance-based equity awards are performance-contingent grants
where the individual will not receive the equity grant by not
meeting the target performance and vice versa.
The level of transparency and disclosure is at the highest level where
shareholders can understand the mechanics of the performance-based equity awards
based on the additional disclosure.
o The compensation committee has the sole authority to hire and fire
outside compensation consultants. The role of the outside
compensation consultant is to assist the compensation committee to
analyze executive pay packages or contracts and understand the
company's financial measures.
THREE-YEAR BURN RATE/BURN RATE COMMITMENT
Generally vote AGAINST plans if the company's most recent three-year burn rate
exceeds one standard deviation in excess of the industry mean (per the following
Burn Rate Table) and is over two percent of common shares outstanding. The
three-year burn rate policy does not apply to non-employee director plans unless
outside directors receive a significant portion of shares each year.
However, vote FOR equity plans if the company fails this burn rate test but the
company commits in a public filing to a three-year average burn rate equal to
its GICS group burn rate mean plus one standard deviation, assuming all other
conditions for voting FOR the plan have been met. If a company fails to fulfill
its burn rate commitment, vote to WITHHOLD from the compensation committee.
----------
1 Non-qualified stock options are not performance-based awards unless the
grant or the vesting of the stock options is tied to the achievement of a
pre-determined and disclosed performance measure. A rising stock market
will generally increase share prices of all companies, despite of the
company's underlying performance.
2 Performance-accelerated grants are awards that vest earlier based on the
achievement of a specified measure. However, these grants will ultimately
vest over time even without the attainment of the goal(s).
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26
================================================================================
2006 PROXY SEASON BURN RATE TABLE
RUSSELL 3000 NON-RUSSELL 3000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STANDARD STANDARD
GICS DESCRIPTION MEAN DEVIATION MEAN+STDEV MEAN DEVIATION MEAN+STDEV
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1010 Energy 1.53% 0.96% 2.50% 2.03% 2.53% 4.56%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1510 Materials 1.37% 0.74% 2.11% 2.15% 2.01% 4.16%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 Capital Goods 1.84% 1.09% 2.93% 2.74% 2.63% 5.37%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020 Commercial Services & Supplies 2.73% 1.60% 4.33% 3.43% 4.18% 7.61%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2030 Transportation 1.76% 1.71% 3.47% 2.18% 2.12% 4.30%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2510 Automobiles & Components 1.97% 1.27% 3.24% 2.23% 2.29% 4.51%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2520 Consumer Durables & Apparel 2.04% 1.22% 3.26% 2.86% 2.48% 5.35%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2530 Hotels Restaurants & Leisure 2.22% 1.09% 3.31% 2.71% 2.46% 5.17%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2540 Media 2.14% 1.24% 3.38% 3.26% 2.52% 5.77%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2550 Retailing 2.54% 1.59% 4.12% 4.01% 4.03% 8.03%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3010, 3020,
3030 Food & Staples Retailing 1.82% 1.31% 3.13% 2.20% 2.79% 4.99%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3510 Health Care Equipment & Services 3.20% 1.71% 4.91% 4.33% 3.20% 7.53%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3520 Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 3.70% 1.87% 5.57% 5.41% 4.74% 10.15%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4010 Banks 1.46% 1.00% 2.46% 1.38% 1.42% 2.79%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4020 Diversified Financials 3.00% 2.28% 5.28% 4.46% 4.01% 8.47%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4030 Insurance 1.52% 1.04% 2.56% 2.25% 2.85% 5.10%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4040 Real Estate 1.30% 1.01% 2.31% 1.12% 1.67% 2.79%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4510 Software & Services 5.02% 2.98% 8.00% 6.92% 6.05% 12.97%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4520 Technology Hardware & Equipment 3.64% 2.48% 6.11% 4.73% 4.02% 8.75%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4530 Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equip. 4.81% 2.86% 7.67% 5.01% 3.06% 8.07%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5010 Telecommunication Services 2.31% 1.61% 3.92% 3.70% 3.41% 7.11%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5510 Utilities 0.94% 0.62% 1.56% 2.11% 4.13% 6.24%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For companies that grant both full value awards and stock options to their
employees, apply a premium on full value awards for the past three fiscal years
as follows:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHARACTERISTICS ANNUAL STOCK PRICE PREMIUM
VOLATILITY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High annual volatility 53% and higher 1 full-value award for 1.5 option shares
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderate annual volatility 25% - 52% 1 full-value award for 2.0 option shares
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low annual volatility Less than 25% 1 full-value award for 4.0 option shares
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POOR PAY PRACTICES
Vote AGAINST equity plans if the plan is a vehicle for poor compensation
practices.
WITHOLD from compensation committee members if the company has poor compensation
practices.
Poor compensation practices include, but are not limited to, the following:
o Egregious employment contracts including excessive severance
provisions;
o Excessive perks that dominate compensation;
o Huge bonus payouts without justifiable performance linkage;
o Performance metrics that are changed during the performance period;
o Egregious SERP (Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans) payouts;
o New CEO with overly generous hiring package;
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 27
================================================================================
o Internal pay disparity;
o Other excessive compensation payouts or poor pay practices at the
company.
SPECIFIC TREATMENT OF CERTAIN AWARD TYPES IN EQUITY PLAN EVALUATIONS:
DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT RIGHTS
Equity plans that have Dividend Equivalent Rights (DERs) associated with them
will have a higher calculated award value than those without DERs under the
binomial model, based on the value of these dividend streams. The higher value
will be applied to new shares, shares available under existing plans, and shares
awarded but not exercised per the plan specifications. DERS transfer more
shareholder equity to employees and non-employee directors and this cost should
be captured.
LIBERAL SHARE RECYCLING PROVISIONS
Under net share counting provisions, shares tendered by an option holder to pay
for the exercise of an option, shares withheld for taxes or shares repurchased
by the company on the open market can be recycled back into the equity plan for
awarding again. All awards with such provisions should be valued as full-value
awards. Stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) will also be considered
as full-value awards if a company counts only the net shares issued to employees
towards their plan reserve.
TRANSFERABLE STOCK OPTION AWARDS
For transferable stock option award types within a new equity plan, calculate
the cost of the awards by setting their forfeiture rate to zero when comparing
to the allowable cap. In addition, in order to vote FOR plans with such awards,
the structure and mechanics of the ongoing transferable stock option program
must be disclosed to shareholders; and amendments to existing plans that allow
for introduction of transferability of stock options should make clear that only
options granted post-amendment shall be transferable.
OTHER COMPENSATION PROPOSALS AND POLICIES
401(K) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Vote FOR proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on compensation plans for non-employee directors, based on the
cost of the plans against the company's allowable cap.
On occasion, director stock plans that set aside a relatively small number of
shares when combined with employee or executive stock compensation plans exceed
the allowable cap. Vote for the plan if ALL of the following qualitative factors
in the board's compensation are met and disclosed in the proxy statement:
o Director stock ownership guidelines with a minimum of three times
the annual cash retainer.
o Vesting schedule or mandatory holding/deferral period:
- A minimum vesting of three years for stock options or
restricted stock; or
- Deferred stock payable at the end of a three-year deferral
period.
o Mix between cash and equity:
- A balanced mix of cash and equity, for example 40% cash/60%
equity or 50% cash/50% equity; or
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 28
================================================================================
- If the mix is heavier on the equity component, the vesting
schedule or deferral period should be more stringent, with the
lesser of five years or the term of directorship.
o No retirement/benefits and perquisites provided to non-employee
directors; and
o Detailed disclosure provided on cash and equity compensation
delivered to each non- employee director for the most recent fiscal
year in a table. The column headers for the table may include the
following: name of each non-employee director, annual retainer,
board meeting fees, committee retainer, committee-meeting fees, and
equity grants.
DIRECTOR RETIREMENT PLANS
Vote AGAINST retirement plans for non-employee directors.
Vote FOR shareholder proposals to eliminate retirement plans for non-employee
directors.
DISCLOSURE OF CEO COMPENSATION-TALLY SHEET
Encourage companies to provide better and more transparent disclosure related to
CEO pay. Consider withhold votes in the future from the compensation committee
and voting against equity plans if compensation disclosure is not improved and a
tally sheet is not provided.
In addition to the current SEC requirements, the following table sets forth the
current minimum standard on CEO pay disclosure according to ISS's guidelines:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPONENT AMOUNT EARNED/GRANTED DESCRIPTION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Salary Current figure Explanation of any increase in
base salary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Incentive Target: Explanation of specific
Actual earned: performance measures and
actual deliverables.
State amount tied to actual
performance.
State any discretionary bonus.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock Options Number granted: Rationale for determining the
Exercise price: number of stock options
Vesting: issued to CEO.
Grant value:
Accumulated dividend
equivalents (if any).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restricted Stock Number granted: Performance based or time
Vesting: based.
Grant value:
Rationale for determining the
number of restricted stock
issued to CEO.
Accumulated dividends on
vested and unvested portion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance Shares Minimum: Explanation of specific
Target: performance measures and
Maximum: actual deliverables.
Actual earned:
Grant value: Any dividends on unearned
performance shares.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 29
================================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPONENT AMOUNT EARNED/GRANTED DESCRIPTION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred compensation Executive portion: Provide structure and terms of
Company match (if any): program.
Accumulated executive Explanation of interest,
portion: formulas, minimum
Accumulated company match guarantees or multipliers on
(if any): deferred compensation.
Any holding periods on the
company match portion.
Funding mechanism
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental retirement Actual projected payment Provide structure and terms of
benefit obligations program.
Explanation of formula,
additional credits for years not
worked, multipliers or interest
on SERPs.
Funding mechanism.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive perquisites Breakdown of the market The types of perquisites
value of various perquisites provided. Examples: company
aircraft, company cars, etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross-ups (if any) Breakdown of gross-ups for
any pay component
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severance associated with Estimated payout amounts for Single trigger or double
change-in-control cash, equity and benefits trigger.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severance (Termination Estimated payout amounts for
scenario under "for cause" and cash, equity and benefits
"not for cause") under different scenarios
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post retirement package Estimated value of consulting
agreement and continuation of
benefits
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED TOTAL PACKAGE $
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See the remedy for Pay for Performance disconnect for a more qualitative
description of certain pay components.
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLANS (ESOPS)
Vote FOR proposals to implement an ESOP or increase authorized shares for
existing ESOPs, unless the number of shares allocated to the ESOP is excessive
(more than five percent of outstanding shares).
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLANS-- QUALIFIED PLANS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on qualified employee stock purchase plans. Vote FOR employee
stock purchase plans where all of the following apply:
o Purchase price is at least 85 percent of fair market value;
o Offering period is 27 months or less; and
o The number of shares allocated to the plan is ten percent or less of
the outstanding shares.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 30
================================================================================
Vote AGAINST qualified employee stock purchase plans where any of the following
apply:
o Purchase price is less than 85 percent of fair market value; or
o Offering period is greater than 27 months; or
o The number of shares allocated to the plan is more than ten percent
of the outstanding shares.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLANS-- NON-QUALIFIED PLANS
Vote CASE-by-CASE on nonqualified employee stock purchase plans. Vote FOR
nonqualified employee stock purchase plans with all the following features:
o Broad-based participation (i.e., all employees of the company with
the exclusion of individuals with 5 percent or more of beneficial
ownership of the company);
o Limits on employee contribution, which may be a fixed dollar amount
or expressed as a percent of base salary;
o Company matching contribution up to 25 percent of employee's
contribution, which is effectively a discount of 20 percent from
market value;
o No discount on the stock price on the date of purchase since there
is a company matching contribution.
Vote AGAINST nonqualified employee stock purchase plans when any of the plan
features do not meet the above criteria. If the company matching contribution
exceeds 25 percent of employee's contribution, evaluate the cost of the plan
against its allowable cap.
INCENTIVE BONUS PLANS AND TAX DEDUCTIBILITY PROPOSALS (OBRA-RELATED COMPENSATION
PROPOSALS)
Vote FOR proposals that simply amend shareholder-approved compensation plans to
include administrative features or place a cap on the annual grants any one
participant may receive to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m).
Vote FOR proposals to add performance goals to existing compensation plans to
comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) unless they are clearly
inappropriate.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on amendments to existing plans to increase shares reserved
and to qualify for favorable tax treatment under the provisions of Section
162(m) as long as the plan does not exceed the allowable cap and the plan does
not violate any of the supplemental policies.
Generally vote FOR cash or cash and stock bonus plans that are submitted to
shareholders for the purpose of exempting compensation from taxes under the
provisions of Section 162(m) if no increase in shares is requested.
OPTION EXCHANGE PROGRAMS/REPRICING OPTIONS
Vote CASE-by-CASE on management proposals seeking approval to exchange/reprice
options taking into consideration:
o Historic trading patterns;
o Rationale for the repricing;
o Value-for-value exchange;
o Treatment of surrendered options;
o Option vesting;
o Term of the option;
o Exercise price;
o Participation.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 31
================================================================================
If the surrendered options are added back to the equity plans for re-issuance,
then also take into consideration the company's three-year average burn rate.
Vote FOR shareholder proposals to put option repricings to a shareholder vote.
STOCK PLANS IN LIEU OF CASH
Vote CASE-by-CASE on plans which provide participants with the option of taking
all or a portion of their cash compensation in the form of stock.
Vote FOR non-employee director only equity plans which provide a
dollar-for-dollar cash for stock exchange.
Vote CASE-by-CASE on plans which do not provide a dollar-for-dollar cash for
stock exchange. In cases where the exchange is not dollar-for-dollar, the
request for new or additional shares for such equity program will be considered
using the binomial option pricing model. In an effort to capture the total cost
of total compensation, ISS will not make any adjustments to carve out the
in-lieu-of cash compensation.
TRANSFER PROGRAMS OF STOCK OPTIONS
One-time Transfers: WITHHOLD votes from compensation committee members if they
fail to submit one-time transfers for to shareholders for approval.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on one-time transfers. Vote FOR if:
o Executive officers and non-employee directors are excluded from
participating;
o Stock options are purchased by third-party financial institutions at
a discount to their fair value using option pricing models such as
Black-Scholes or a Binomial Option Valuation or other appropriate
financial models;
o There is a two-year minimum holding period for sale proceeds (cash
or stock) for all participants.
Additionally, management should provide a clear explanation of why options are
being transferred and whether the events leading up to the decline in stock
price were beyond management's control. A review of the company's historic stock
price volatility should indicate if the options are likely to be back
"in-the-money" over the near term.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS ON COMPENSATION
DISCLOSURE/SETTING LEVELS OR TYPES OF COMPENSATION FOR EXECUTIVES AND DIRECTORS
Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals seeking additional disclosure of
executive and director pay information, provided the information requested is
relevant to shareholders' needs, would not put the company at a competitive
disadvantage relative to its industry, and is not unduly burdensome to the
company.
Vote AGAINST shareholder proposals seeking to set absolute levels on
compensation or otherwise dictate the amount or form of compensation.
Vote AGAINST shareholder proposals requiring director fees be paid in stock
only.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on all other shareholder proposals regarding executive and
director pay, taking into account company performance, pay level versus peers,
pay level versus industry, and long term corporate outlook.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 32
================================================================================
OPTION EXPENSING
Generally vote FOR shareholder proposals asking the company to expense stock
options, unless the company has already publicly committed to expensing options
by a specific date.
OPTION REPRICING
Vote FOR shareholder proposals to put option repricings to a shareholder vote.
PENSION PLAN INCOME ACCOUNTING
Generally vote FOR shareholder proposals to exclude pension plan income in the
calculation of earnings used in determining executive bonuses/compensation.
PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
Generally vote FOR shareholder proposals advocating the use of performance-based
awards like indexed, premium-priced, and performance-vested options or
performance-based shares, unless:
o The proposal is overly restrictive (e.g., it mandates that awards to
all employees must be performance-based or all awards to top
executives must be a particular type, such as indexed options);
o The company demonstrates that it is using a substantial portion of
performance-based awards for its top executives, where substantial
portion would constitute 50 percent of the shares awarded to those
executives for that fiscal year.
SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVES/GOLDEN PARACHUTES
Vote FOR shareholder proposals to require golden parachutes or executive
severance agreements to be submitted for shareholder ratification, unless the
proposal requires shareholder approval prior to entering into employment
contracts.
Vote on a CASE-BY-CASE basis on proposals to ratify or cancel golden parachutes.
An acceptable parachute should include, but is not limited to, the following:
o The triggering mechanism should be beyond the control of management;
o The amount should not exceed three times base amount (defined as the
average annual taxable W-2 compensation during the five years prior
to the year in which the change of control occurs;
o Change-in-control payments should be double-triggered, i.e., (1)
after a change in control has taken place, and (2) termination of
the executive as a result of the change in control. Change in
control is defined as a change in the company ownership structure.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLANS (SERPS)
Generally vote FOR shareholder proposals requesting to put extraordinary
benefits contained in SERP agreements to a shareholder vote unless the company's
executive pension plans do not contain excessive benefits beyond what is offered
under employee-wide plans.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 33
================================================================================
9. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
CONSUMER ISSUES AND PUBLIC SAFETY
ANIMAL RIGHTS
Generally vote AGAINST proposals to phase out the use of animals in product
testing unless:
o The company is conducting animal testing programs that are
unnecessary or not required by regulation;
o The company is conducting animal testing when suitable alternatives
are accepted and used at peer firms;
o The company has been the subject of recent, significant controversy
related to its testing programs.
Generally vote FOR proposals seeking a report on the company's animal welfare
standards unless:
o The company has already published a set of animal welfare standards
and monitors compliance;
o The company's standards are comparable to or better than those of
peer firms; and
o There are no serious controversies surrounding the company's
treatment of animals.
DRUG PRICING
Generally vote AGAINST proposals requesting that companies implement specific
price restraints on pharmaceutical products unless the company fails to adhere
to legislative guidelines or industry norms in its product pricing.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals requesting that the company evaluate their
product pricing considering:
o The existing level of disclosure on pricing policies;
o Deviation from established industry pricing norms;
o The company's existing initiatives to provide its products to needy
consumers;
o Whether the proposal focuses on specific products or geographic
regions.
DRUG REIMPORTATION
Generally vote FOR proposals requesting that companies report on the financial
and legal impact of their policies regarding prescription drug reimportation
unless such information is already publicly disclosed.
Generally vote AGAINST proposals requesting that companies adopt specific
policies to encourage or constrain prescription drug reimportation.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
Vote AGAINST proposals asking companies to voluntarily label genetically
engineered (GE) ingredients in their products or alternatively to provide
interim labeling and eventually eliminate GE ingredients due to the costs and
feasibility of labeling and/or phasing out the use of GE ingredients.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals asking for a report on the feasibility of
labeling products containing GE ingredients taking into account:
o The relevance of the proposal in terms of the company's business and
the proportion of it affected by the resolution;
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 34
================================================================================
o The quality of the company's disclosure on GE product labeling and
related voluntary initiatives and how this disclosure compares with
peer company disclosure;
o Company's current disclosure on the feasibility of GE product
labeling, including information on the related costs;
o Any voluntary labeling initiatives undertaken or considered by the
company.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals asking for the preparation of a report on the
financial, legal, and environmental impact of continued use of GE
ingredients/seeds. Evaluate the following:
o The relevance of the proposal in terms of the company's business and
the proportion of it affected by the resolution;
o The quality of the company's disclosure on risks related to GE
product use and how this disclosure compares with peer company
disclosure;
o The percentage of revenue derived from international operations,
particularly in Europe, where GE products are more regulated and
consumer backlash is more pronounced.
Vote AGAINST proposals seeking a report on the health and environmental effects
of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Health studies of this sort are better
undertaken by regulators and the scientific community.
Vote AGAINST proposals to completely phase out GE ingredients from the company's
products or proposals asking for reports outlining the steps necessary to
eliminate GE ingredients from the company's products. Such resolutions
presuppose that there are proven health risks to GE ingredients (an issue better
left to federal regulators) that outweigh the economic benefits derived from
biotechnology.
HANDGUNS
Generally vote AGAINST requests for reports on a company's policies aimed at
curtailing gun violence in the United States unless the report is confined to
product safety information. Criminal misuse of firearms is beyond company
control and instead falls within the purview of law enforcement agencies.
HIV/AIDS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on requests for reports outlining the impact of the health
pandemic (HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis) on the company's Sub-Saharan
operations and how the company is responding to it, taking into account:
o The nature and size of the company's operations in Sub-Saharan
Africa and the number of local employees;
o The company's existing healthcare policies, including benefits and
healthcare access for local workers;
o Company donations to healthcare providers operating in the region.
Vote AGAINST proposals asking companies to establish, implement, and report on a
standard of response to the HIV/AIDS, TB, and malaria health pandemic in Africa
and other developing countries, unless the company has significant operations in
these markets and has failed to adopt policies and/or procedures to address
these issues comparable to those of industry peers.
PREDATORY LENDING
Vote CASE-BY CASE on requests for reports on the company's procedures for
preventing predatory lending, including the establishment of a board committee
for oversight, taking into account:
o Whether the company has adequately disclosed mechanisms in place to
prevent abusive lending practices;
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 35
================================================================================
o Whether the company has adequately disclosed the financial risks of
its subprime business;
o Whether the company has been subject to violations of lending laws
or serious lending controversies;
o Peer companies' policies to prevent abusive lending practices.
TOBACCO
Most tobacco-related proposals should be evaluated on a CASE-BY-CASE basis,
taking into account the following factors:
Second-hand smoke:
o Whether the company complies with all local ordinances and
regulations;
o The degree that voluntary restrictions beyond those mandated by law
might hurt the company's competitiveness;
o The risk of any health-related liabilities.
Advertising to youth:
o Whether the company complies with federal, state, and local laws on
the marketing of tobacco or if it has been fined for violations;
o Whether the company has gone as far as peers in restricting
advertising;
o Whether the company entered into the Master Settlement Agreement,
which restricts marketing of tobacco to youth;
o Whether restrictions on marketing to youth extend to foreign
countries.
Cease production of tobacco-related products or avoid selling products to
tobacco companies:
o The percentage of the company's business affected;
o The economic loss of eliminating the business versus any potential
tobacco-related liabilities.
Spin-off tobacco-related businesses:
o The percentage of the company's business affected;
o The feasibility of a spin-off;
o Potential future liabilities related to the company's tobacco
business.
Stronger product warnings:
Vote AGAINST proposals seeking stronger product warnings. Such decisions are
better left to public health authorities.
Investment in tobacco stocks:
Vote AGAINST proposals prohibiting investment in tobacco equities. Such
decisions are better left to portfolio managers.
TOXIC CHEMICALS
Generally vote FOR resolutions requesting that a company discloses its policies
related to toxic chemicals.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on resolutions requesting that companies evaluate and disclose
the potential financial and legal risks associated with utilizing certain
chemicals, considering:
o Current regulations in the markets in which the company operates;
o Recent significant controversy, litigation, or fines stemming from
toxic chemicals or ingredients at the company; and
o The current level of disclosure on this topic.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 36
================================================================================
Generally vote AGAINST resolutions requiring that a company reformulate its
products within a certain timeframe unless such actions are required by law in
specific markets.
ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY
ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
Generally vote AGAINST request for reports outlining potential environmental
damage from drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) unless:
o New legislation is adopted allowing development and drilling in the
ANWR region;
o The company intends to pursue operations in the ANWR; and
o The company does not currently disclose an environmental risk report
for their operations in the ANWR.
CERES PRINCIPLES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to adopt the CERES Principles, taking into
account:
o The company's current environmental disclosure beyond legal
requirements, including environmental health and safety (EHS) audits
and reports that may duplicate CERES;
o The company's environmental performance record, including violations
of federal and state regulations, level of toxic emissions, and
accidental spills;
o Environmentally conscious practices of peer companies, including
endorsement of CERES;
o Costs of membership and implementation.
CONCENTRATED AREA FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFOS)
Vote FOR resolutions requesting that companies report to shareholders on the
risks and liabilities associated with CAFOs unless:
o The company has publicly disclosed guidelines for its corporate and
contract farming operations, including compliance monitoring; or
o The company does not directly source from CAFOs.
ENVIRONMENTAL-ECONOMIC RISK REPORT
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals requesting an economic risk assessment of
environmental performance considering:
o The feasibility of financially quantifying environmental risk
factors;
o The company's compliance with applicable legislation and/or
regulations regarding environmental performance;
o The costs associated with implementing improved standards;
o The potential costs associated with remediation resulting from poor
environmental performance; and
o The current level of disclosure on environmental policies and
initiatives.
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
Generally vote FOR requests for reports disclosing the company's environmental
policies unless it already has well-documented environmental management systems
that are available to the public.
GLOBAL WARMING
Generally vote FOR proposals requesting a report on greenhouse gas emissions
from company operations and/or products unless this information is already
publicly disclosed or such factors are not integral to the company's line of
business.
Generally vote AGAINST proposals that call for reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions by specified amounts or within a restrictive time frame unless the
company lags industry standards
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 37
================================================================================
and has been the subject of recent, significant fines or litigation resulting
from greenhouse gas emissions.
KYOTO PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE
Generally vote FOR resolutions requesting that companies outline their
preparations to comply with standards established by Kyoto Protocol signatory
markets unless:
o The company does not maintain operations in Kyoto signatory markets;
o The company already evaluates and substantially discloses such
information; or,
o Greenhouse gas emissions do not significantly impact the company's
core businesses.
LAND USE
Generally vote AGAINST resolutions that request the disclosure of detailed
information on a company's policies related to land use or development unless
the company has been the subject of recent, significant fines or litigation
stemming from its land use.
NUCLEAR SAFETY
Generally vote AGAINST resolutions requesting that companies report on risks
associated with their nuclear reactor designs and/or the production and interim
storage of irradiated fuel rods unless:
o The company does not have publicly disclosed guidelines describing
its policies and procedures for addressing risks associated with its
operations;
o The company is non-compliant with Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) requirements; or
o The company stands out amongst its peers or competitors as having
significant problems with safety or environmental performance
related to its nuclear operations.
OPERATIONS IN PROTECTED AREAS
Generally vote FOR requests for reports outlining potential environmental damage
from operations in protected regions, including wildlife refuges unless:
o The company does not currently have operations or plans to develop
operations in these protected regions; or,
o The company provides disclosure on its operations and environmental
policies in these regions comparable to industry peers.
RECYCLING
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to adopt a comprehensive recycling strategy,
taking into account:
o The nature of the company's business and the percentage affected;
o The extent that peer companies are recycling;
o The timetable prescribed by the proposal;
o The costs and methods of implementation;
o Whether the company has a poor environmental track record, such as
violations of federal and state regulations.
RENEWABLE ENERGY
In general, vote FOR requests for reports on the feasibility of developing
renewable energy sources unless the report is duplicative of existing disclosure
or irrelevant to the company's line of business.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 38
================================================================================
Generally vote AGAINST proposals requesting that the company invest in renewable
energy sources. Such decisions are best left to management's evaluation of the
feasibility and financial impact that such programs may have on the company.
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Generally vote FOR proposals requesting the company to report on policies and
initiatives related to social, economic, and environmental sustainability,
unless:
o The company already discloses similar information through existing
reports or policies such as an Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS)
report; a comprehensive Code of Corporate Conduct; and/or a
Diversity Report; or
o The company has formally committed to the implementation of a
reporting program based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
guidelines or a similar standard within a specified time frame.
GENERAL CORPORATE ISSUES
CHARITABLE/POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Generally vote AGAINST proposals asking the company to affirm political
nonpartisanship in the workplace so long as:
o The company is in compliance with laws governing corporate political
activities; and
o The company has procedures in place to ensure that employee
contributions to company-sponsored political action committees
(PACs) are strictly voluntary and not coercive.
Vote AGAINST proposals to publish in newspapers and public media the company's
political contributions as such publications could present significant cost to
the company without providing commensurate value to shareholders.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to improve the disclosure of a company's
political contributions considering:
o Recent significant controversy or litigation related to the
company's political contributions or governmental affairs; and
o The public availability of a policy on political contributions.
Vote AGAINST proposals barring the company from making political contributions.
Businesses are affected by legislation at the federal, state, and local level
and barring contributions can put the company at a competitive disadvantage.
Vote AGAINST proposals restricting the company from making charitable
contributions. Charitable contributions are generally useful for assisting
worthwhile causes and for creating goodwill in the community. In the absence of
bad faith, self-dealing, or gross negligence, management should determine which
contributions are in the best interests of the company.
Vote AGAINST proposals asking for a list of company executives, directors,
consultants, legal counsels, lobbyists, or investment bankers that have prior
government service and whether such service had a bearing on the business of the
company. Such a list would be burdensome to prepare without providing any
meaningful information to shareholders.
LINK EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TO SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to review ways of linking executive compensation
to social factors, such as corporate downsizings, customer or employee
satisfaction, community involvement, human rights, environmental performance,
predatory lending, and executive/employee pay disparities. Such resolutions
should be evaluated in the context of:
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 39
================================================================================
o The relevance of the issue to be linked to pay;
o The degree that social performance is already included in the
company's pay structure and disclosed;
o The degree that social performance is used by peer companies in
setting pay;
o Violations or complaints filed against the company relating to the
particular social performance measure;
o Artificial limits sought by the proposal, such as freezing or
capping executive pay
o Independence of the compensation committee;
o Current company pay levels.
OUTSOURCING/OFFSHORING
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals calling for companies to report on the risks
associated with outsourcing, considering:
o Risks associated with certain international markets;
o The utility of such a report to shareholders;
o The existence of a publicly available code of corporate conduct that
applies to international operations.
LABOR STANDARDS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
CHINA PRINCIPLES
Vote AGAINST proposals to implement the China Principles unless:
o There are serious controversies surrounding the company's China
operations; and
o The company does not have a code of conduct with standards similar
to those promulgated by the International Labor Organization (ILO).
COUNTRY-SPECIFIC HUMAN RIGHTS REPORTS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on requests for reports detailing the company's operations in
a particular country and steps to protect human rights, based on:
o The nature and amount of company business in that country;
o The company's workplace code of conduct;
o Proprietary and confidential information involved;
o Company compliance with U.S. regulations on investing in the
country;
o Level of peer company involvement in the country.
INTERNATIONAL CODES OF CONDUCT/VENDOR STANDARDS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to implement certain human rights standards at
company facilities or those of its suppliers and to commit to outside,
independent monitoring. In evaluating these proposals, the following should be
considered:
o The company's current workplace code of conduct or adherence to
other global standards and the degree they meet the standards
promulgated by the proponent;
o Agreements with foreign suppliers to meet certain workplace
standards;
o Whether company and vendor facilities are monitored and how;
o Company participation in fair labor organizations;
o Type of business;
o Proportion of business conducted overseas;
o Countries of operation with known human rights abuses;
o Whether the company has been recently involved in significant labor
and human rights controversies or violations;
o Peer company standards and practices;
o Union presence in company's international factories.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 40
================================================================================
Generally vote FOR reports outlining vendor standards compliance unless any of
the following apply:
o The company does not operate in countries with significant human
rights violations;
o The company has no recent human rights controversies or violations;
or
o The company already publicly discloses information on its vendor
standards compliance.
MACBRIDE PRINCIPLES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to endorse or increase activity on the MacBride
Principles, taking into account:
o Company compliance with or violations of the Fair Employment Act of
1989;
o Company antidiscrimination policies that already exceed the legal
requirements;
o The cost and feasibility of adopting all nine principles;
o The cost of duplicating efforts to follow two sets of standards
(Fair Employment and the MacBride Principles);
o The potential for charges of reverse discrimination;
o The potential that any company sales or contracts in the rest of the
United Kingdom could be negatively impacted;
o The level of the company's investment in Northern Ireland;
o The number of company employees in Northern Ireland;
o The degree that industry peers have adopted the MacBride Principles;
o Applicable state and municipal laws that limit contracts with
companies that have not adopted the MacBride Principles.
MILITARY BUSINESS
FOREIGN MILITARY SALES/OFFSETS
Vote AGAINST reports on foreign military sales or offsets. Such disclosures may
involve sensitive and confidential information. Moreover, companies must comply
with government controls and reporting on foreign military sales.
LANDMINES AND CLUSTER BOMBS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals asking a company to renounce future involvement
in antipersonnel landmine production, taking into account:
o Whether the company has in the past manufactured landmine
components;
o Whether the company's peers have renounced future production.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals asking a company to renounce future involvement
in cluster bomb production, taking into account:
o What weapons classifications the proponent views as cluster bombs;
o Whether the company currently or in the past has manufactured
cluster bombs or their components;
o The percentage of revenue derived from cluster bomb manufacture;
o Whether the company's peers have renounced future production.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Vote AGAINST proposals asking a company to cease production of nuclear weapons
components and delivery systems, including disengaging from current and proposed
contracts. Components and delivery systems serve multiple military and
non-military uses, and withdrawal from these contracts could have a negative
impact on the company's business.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 41
================================================================================
OPERATIONS IN NATIONS SPONSORING TERRORISM (E.G., IRAN)
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on requests for a board committee review and report outlining
the company's financial and reputational risks from its operations in a
terrorism-sponsoring state, taking into account current disclosure on:
o The nature and purpose of the operations and the amount of business
involved (direct and indirect revenues and expenses) that could be
affected by political disruption;
o Compliance with U.S. sanctions and laws.
SPACED-BASED WEAPONIZATION
Generally vote FOR reports on a company's involvement in spaced-based
weaponization unless:
o The information is already publicly available; or
o The disclosures sought could compromise proprietary information.
WORKPLACE DIVERSITY
BOARD DIVERSITY
Generally vote FOR reports on the company's efforts to diversify the board,
unless:
o The board composition is reasonably inclusive in relation to
companies of similar size and business; or
o The board already reports on its nominating procedures and diversity
initiatives.
Generally vote AGAINST proposals that would call for the adoption of specific
committee charter language regarding diversity initiatives unless the company
fails to publicly disclose existing equal opportunity or non-discrimination
policies.
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals asking the company to increase the representation
of women and minorities on the board, taking into account:
o The degree of board diversity;
o Comparison with peer companies;
o Established process for improving board diversity;
o Existence of independent nominating committee;
o Use of outside search firm;
o History of EEO violations.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO)
Generally vote FOR reports outlining the company's affirmative action
initiatives unless all of the following apply:
o The company has well-documented equal opportunity programs;
o The company already publicly reports on its company-wide affirmative
initiatives and provides data on its workforce diversity; and
o The company has no recent EEO-related violations or litigation.
Vote AGAINST proposals seeking information on the diversity efforts of suppliers
and service providers, which can pose a significant cost and administration
burden on the company.
GLASS CEILING
Generally vote FOR reports outlining the company's progress towards the Glass
Ceiling Commission's business recommendations, unless:
o The composition of senior management and the board is fairly
inclusive;
o The company has well-documented programs addressing diversity
initiatives and leadership development;
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 42
================================================================================
o The company already issues public reports on its company-wide
affirmative initiatives and provides data on its workforce
diversity; and
o The company has had no recent, significant EEO-related violations or
litigation.
SEXUAL ORIENTATION
Vote FOR proposals seeking to amend a company's EEO statement in order to
prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, unless the change would
result in excessive costs for the company.
Vote AGAINST proposals to ext end company benefits to or eliminate benefits from
domestic partners. Benefits decisions should be left to the discretion of the
company.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 43
================================================================================
10. MUTUAL FUND PROXIES
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on the election of directors and trustees, following the same
guidelines for uncontested directors for public company shareholder meetings.
However, mutual fund boards do not usually have compensation committees, so do
not withhold for the lack of this committee.
CONVERTING CLOSED-END FUND TO OPEN-END FUND
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on conversion proposals, considering the following factors:
o Past performance as a closed-end fund;
o Market in which the fund invests;
o Measures taken by the board to address the discount; and
o Past shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related
proposals.
PROXY CONTESTS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proxy contests, considering the following factors:
o Past performance relative to its peers;
o Market in which fund invests;
o Measures taken by the board to address the issues;
o Past shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related
proposals;
o Strategy of the incumbents versus the dissidents;
o Independence of directors;
o Experience and skills of director candidates;
o Governance profile of the company;
o Evidence of management entrenchment.
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on investment advisory agreements, considering the following
factors:
o Proposed and current fee schedules;
o Fund category/investment objective;
o Performance benchmarks;
o Share price performance as compared with peers;
o Resulting fees relative to peers;
o Assignments (where the advisor undergoes a change of control).
APPROVING NEW CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES
Vote FOR the establishment of new classes or series of shares.
PREFERRED STOCK PROPOSALS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on the authorization for or increase in preferred shares,
considering the following factors:
o Stated specific financing purpose;
o Possible dilution for common shares;
o Whether the shares can be used for antitakeover purposes.
1940 ACT POLICIES
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on policies under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940,
considering the following factors:
o Potential competitiveness;
o Regulatory developments;
o Current and potential returns; and
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 44
================================================================================
o Current and potential risk.
Generally vote FOR these amendments as long as the proposed changes do not
fundamentally alter the investment focus of the fund and do comply with the
current SEC interpretation.
CHANGING A FUNDAMENTAL RESTRICTION TO A NONFUNDAMENTAL RESTRICTION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to change a fundamental restriction to a
non-fundamental restriction, considering the following factors:
o The fund's target investments;
o The reasons given by the fund for the change; and
o The projected impact of the change on the portfolio.
CHANGE FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE TO NONFUNDAMENTAL
Vote AGAINST proposals to change a fund's fundamental investment objective to
non-fundamental.
NAME CHANGE PROPOSALS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on name change proposals, considering the following factors:
o Political/economic changes in the target market;
o Consolidation in the target market; and
o Current asset composition.
CHANGE IN FUND'S SUBCLASSIFICATION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on changes in a fund's sub-classification, considering the
following factors:
o Potential competitiveness;
o Current and potential returns;
o Risk of concentration;
o Consolidation in target industry.
DISPOSITION OF ASSETS/TERMINATION/LIQUIDATION
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to dispose of assets, to terminate or liquidate,
considering the following factors:
o Strategies employed to salvage the company;
o The fund's past performance;
o The terms of the liquidation.
CHANGES TO THE CHARTER DOCUMENT
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on changes to the charter document, considering the following
factors:
o The degree of change implied by the proposal;
o The efficiencies that could result;
o The state of incorporation;
o Regulatory standards and implications.
Vote AGAINST any of the following changes:
o Removal of shareholder approval requirement to reorganize or
terminate the trust or any of its series;
o Removal of shareholder approval requirement for amendments to the
new declaration of trust;
o Removal of shareholder approval requirement to amend the fund's
management contract, allowing the contract to be modified by the
investment manager and the trust management, as permitted by the
1940 Act;
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 45
================================================================================
o Allow the trustees to impose other fees in addition to sales charges
on investment in a fund, such as deferred sales charges and
redemption fees that may be imposed upon redemption of a fund's
shares;
o Removal of shareholder approval requirement to engage in and
terminate subadvisory arrangements;
o Removal of shareholder approval requirement to change the domicile
of the fund.
CHANGING THE DOMICILE OF A FUND
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on re-incorporations, considering the following factors:
o Regulations of both states;
o Required fundamental policies of both states;
o The increased flexibility available.
AUTHORIZING THE BOARD TO HIRE AND TERMINATE SUBADVISORS WITHOUT SHAREHOLDER
APPROVAL
Vote AGAINST proposals authorizing the board to hire/terminate subadvisors
without shareholder approval.
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on distribution agreement proposals, considering the following
factors:
o Fees charged to comparably sized funds with similar objectives;
o The proposed distributor's reputation and past performance;
o The competitiveness of the fund in the industry;
o The terms of the agreement.
MASTER-FEEDER STRUCTURE
Vote FOR the establishment of a master-feeder structure.
MERGERS
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on merger proposals, considering the following factors:
o Resulting fee structure;
o Performance of both funds;
o Continuity of management personnel;
o Changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder
rights.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR MUTUAL FUNDS
ESTABLISH DIRECTOR OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT
Generally vote AGAINST shareholder proposals that mandate a specific minimum
amount of stock that directors must own in order to qualify as a director or to
remain on the board.
REIMBURSE SHAREHOLDER FOR EXPENSES INCURRED
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals to reimburse proxy solicitation
expenses. When supporting the dissidents, vote FOR the reimbursement of the
proxy solicitation expenses.
TERMINATE THE INVESTMENT ADVISOR
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to terminate the investment advisor, considering
the following factors:
o Performance of the fund's Net Asset Value (NAV);
o The fund's history of shareholder relations;
o The performance of other funds under the advisor's management.
================================================================================
(C) 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. 46
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
(A)(1) IDENTIFICATION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGER(S) OR MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS AND
DESCRIPTION OF ROLE OF PORTFOLIO MANAGER(S) OR MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS
First Trust Advisors L.P. ("First Trust") is the investment adviser of
the registrant. As of May 31, 2006, the Investment Committee of First Trust is
primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant. There is
no one individual primarily responsible for the portfolio management decisions
for the Registrant. As of May 31, 2006, there are five members of the Investment
Committee, as follows:
POSITION LENGTH OF SERVICE PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
NAME WITH FIRST TRUST WITH FIRST TRUST DURING PAST FIVE YEARS
Daniel J. Chairman of the 2 years Senior Vice President
Lindquist Investment Committee of First Trust and
and Senior Vice First Trust Portfolios
President L.P., Chief Operating
Officer of Mina
Capital Management
from 2000 to 2003
Robert F. Chief Investment 15 years Chief Investment
Carey Officer and Senior Officer and Senior
Vice President Vice President of
First Trust; Senior
Vice President of
First Trust
Portfolios L.P.
Jon C. Senior Vice President 12 years Senior Vice President
Erickson of First Trust and
First Trust Portfolios
L.P. (August 2002 to
present); Vice
President of First
Trust and First Trust
Portfolios L.P. (March
1994 to August 2002)
David G. Senior Vice President 9 years Senior Vice President
McGarel of First Trust and
First Trust Portfolios
L.P. (August 2002 to
present); Vice
President of First
Trust and First Trust
Portfolios L.P.
(August 1997 to August
2002)
Roger F. Senior Vice President 5 years Senior Vice President
Testin of First Trust and
First Trust Portfolios
L.P. (August 2004 to
present) Vice
President (August 2001
through August 2004);
Analyst, Dolan Capital
Management (1998-2001)
(A)(2) ACCOUNTS MANAGED BY PORTFOLIO MANAGER(S) OR MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBER AND
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Investment Committee manages the investment vehicles with the
number of accounts and assets, as of May 31, 2006, set forth in the table below:
TYPE OF INVESTMENT VEHICLE NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS TOTAL ASSETS IN
ACCOUNTS
Registered Investment Companies 41 $4,400,000,000
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles 3124 $700,000,000
Other Accounts 0 $0
None of the accounts managed by the Investment Committee pay an
advisory fee that is based upon the performance of the account. In addition,
First Trust believes that there are no material conflicts of interest that may
arise in connection with the Investment Committee's management of the
registrant's investments and the investments of the other accounts managed by
the Investment Committee. However, because the investment strategies of the
registrant and other accounts managed by the Investment Committee are based on
fairly mechanical investment processes, the Investment Committee may recommend
that certain clients sell and other clients buy a given security at the same
time. In addition, because the investment strategies of the registrant and other
accounts managed by the Investment Committee result in the clients investing in
readily available securities, First Trust believes that there should not be
material conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities between the
registrant and other accounts managed by the Investment Committee.
(A)(3) COMPENSATION STRUCTURE OF PORTFOLIO MANAGER(S) OR MANAGEMENT TEAM
MEMBERS
The compensation structure for each member of the Investment Committee
is based upon a fixed salary as well as a discretionary bonus determined by the
management of First Trust. Salaries are determined by management and are based
upon an individual's position and overall value to the firm. Bonuses are also
determined by management and are based upon an individual's overall contribution
to the success of the firm and the profitability of the firm. Salaries and
bonuses for members of the Investment Committee are not based upon criteria such
as performance of the registrant or the value of assets of the registrant. In
addition, Mr. Carey, Mr. Erickson, Mr. McGarel and Mr. Lindquist also have an
indirect ownership stake in the firm and will therefore receive their allocable
share of ownership related distributions.
(A)(4) DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES OWNERSHIP
As of May 31, 2006, one Portfolio Manager held the following shares of
the registrant:
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Name of Portfolio Manager or Dollar ($) Range of Fund Shares Beneficially
TEAM MEMBER OWNED
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Roger F. Testin $1 - $10,000
--------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
(B) Not applicable.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the
shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's board of directors,
where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided
disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 7(d)(2)(ii)(G) of Schedule
14A (17 CFR 240.14a-101), or this Item. A copy of the amended Nominating and
Governance Committee Charter is available on the Registrant's website at
www.ftportfolios.com.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
"1940 Act") (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within
90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure
required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of these controls
and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR
270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or
240.15d-15(b)).
(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17
CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the registrant's second fiscal
quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
(a)(1) Code of ethics, or any amendment thereto, that is the subject of
disclosure required by Item 2 is attached hereto.
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act and
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(registrant) FIRST TRUST/VALUE LINE(R) & IBBOTSON EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By (Signature and Title)* /S/ JAMES A. BOWEN
-------------------------------------------------------
James A. Bowen, Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date AUGUST 14, 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* /S/ JAMES A. BOWEN
-------------------------------------------------------
James A. Bowen, Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date AUGUST 14, 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By (Signature and Title)* /S/ MARK R. BRADLEY
-------------------------------------------------------
Mark R. Bradley, Treasurer, Controller, Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
(principal financial officer)
Date AUGUST 14, 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.