UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 |
AT&T Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:
| |||
| ||||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:
| |||
| ||||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
| ||||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:
| |||
| ||||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
| ||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
| ||||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
| ||||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
| ||||
(4) | Date Filed:
| |||
|
To Our Stockholders
AT&T Inc. One AT&T Plaza Whitacre Tower 208 S. Akard Street Dallas, TX 75202 |
NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING
OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Stacey Maris
Senior Vice President Assistant General Counsel and Secretary
March 12, 2018
| i | |
Information About the Meeting and Voting
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on April 27, 2018: The proxy statement and annual report to security holders are available at www.edocumentview.com/att.
|
Please sign, date and return your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by telephone or through the Internet promptly so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting. Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and stockholders who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person. |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 1 | |
Proxy Statement Summary
|
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Attending the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please bring the admission ticket (attached to the proxy card or the Annual Meeting Notice) to the Annual Meeting. If you do not have an admission ticket or if you hold your shares in the name of a bank, broker, or other institution, you may obtain admission to the meeting by presenting proof of your ownership of AT&T stock as of February 27, 2018 (the record date).
|
Agenda and Voting Recommendations
Item | Description | Board Recommendation | Page | |||
1 | FOR each nominee | 8 | ||||
2 | FOR | 18 | ||||
3 | FOR | 19 | ||||
4 | Approve Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan | FOR | 20 | |||
5 | Approve 2018 Incentive Plan | FOR | 23 | |||
6 | AGAINST | 25 | ||||
7 | AGAINST | 27 | ||||
8 | AGAINST | 29 | ||||
9 | Stockholder Proposal: Reduce Vote Required for Written Consent |
AGAINST | 30 |
Corporate Governance Highlights
We are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of stockholders, strengthens Board and management accountability, and helps build public trust in the Company. The Corporate Governance section beginning on page 32 describes our governance framework, which includes the following highlights:
Independent Lead Director | Adopted proxy access |
Stockholder right to call special meetings | ||||||
12 independent Director nominees |
Independent Audit, Human Resources, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees |
Directors required to hold shares until they leave the Board | ||||||
Demonstrated Board refreshment and diversity |
Robust Board, Committee, and Director evaluation process |
Clawback policy in place | ||||||
Annual election of Directors by majority vote |
Long-standing commitment to sustainability |
Regular sessions of non-management Directors |
| 2 | | www.att.com |
Proxy Statement Summary
|
Director Nominees*
Snapshot of 2018 Director Nominees
|
Our Director nominees exhibit an effective mix of skills, experience, diversity, and perspectives
| ||||
Name | Age | Director Since |
Principal Occupation | |||
Randall L. Stephenson |
57 | 2005 | Chairman, CEO, and President, AT&T Inc. | |||
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. |
67 | 2015 | Retired Global CEO, PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited | |||
Richard W. Fisher |
68 | 2015 | Former President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas | |||
Scott T. Ford |
55 | 2012 | Member and CEO, Westrock Group, LLC | |||
Glenn H. Hutchins |
62 | 2014 | Co-Founder, North Island and Co-Founder, Silver Lake | |||
William E. Kennard |
61 | 2014 | Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission | |||
Michael B. McCallister |
65 | 2013 | Retired Chairman and CEO, Humana Inc. | |||
Beth E. Mooney |
63 | 2013 | Chairman and CEO, KeyCorp | |||
Joyce M. Roché |
70 | 1998 | Retired President and CEO, Girls Inc. | |||
Matthew K. Rose |
58 | 2010 | Chairman and CEO, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC | |||
Cynthia B. Taylor |
56 | 2013 | President and CEO, Oil States International, Inc. | |||
Laura DAndrea Tyson |
70 | 1999 | Distinguished Professor of the Graduate School, Haas School of Business, and Chair of the Blum Center for Developing Economies Board of Trustees at the University of California at Berkley | |||
Geoffrey Y. Yang |
59 | 2016 | Founding Partner and Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures |
* All Director nominees are independent, except for Mr. Stephenson
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 3 | |
Proxy Statement Summary
|
Executive Compensation Highlights
Over the last few years, we have made several key enhancements to our compensation programs to continue to improve the link between compensation and the Companys business and talent strategies as well as the long-term interests of our stockholders:
Pay and Performance at a Glance*
|
| 4 | | www.att.com |
Information About the Meeting and Voting
|
Attending the Meeting
Only AT&T stockholders may attend the meeting.
Voting Results
| 6 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Name | Age | Director Since |
Principal Occupation | |||
Randall L. Stephenson |
57 | 2005 | Chairman, CEO, and President, AT&T Inc. | |||
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. |
67 | 2015 | Retired Global CEO, PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited | |||
Richard W. Fisher |
68 | 2015 | Former President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas | |||
Scott T. Ford |
55 | 2012 | Member and CEO, Westrock Group, LLC | |||
Glenn H. Hutchins |
62 | 2014 | Co-Founder, North Island and Co-Founder, Silver Lake | |||
William E. Kennard |
61 | 2014 | Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission | |||
Michael B. McCallister |
65 | 2013 | Retired Chairman and CEO, Humana Inc. | |||
Beth E. Mooney |
63 | 2013 | Chairman and CEO, KeyCorp | |||
Joyce M. Roché |
70 | 1998 | Retired President and CEO, Girls Inc. | |||
Matthew K. Rose |
58 | 2010 | Chairman and CEO, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC | |||
Cynthia B. Taylor |
56 | 2013 | President and CEO, Oil States International, Inc. | |||
Laura DAndrea Tyson |
70 | 1999 | Distinguished Professor of the Graduate School, Haas School of Business, and Chair of the Blum Center for Developing Economies Board of Trustees at the University of California at Berkley | |||
Geoffrey Y. Yang |
59 | 2016 | Founding Partner and Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures |
All Director nominees are independent, except for Mr. Stephenson
| 8 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Director Biographies
✓ |
The Board recommends you vote FOR each of the following candidates: |
Randall L. Stephenson
|
Age 57 Director since 2005 | |||||||||
|
Mr. Stephenson is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President of AT&T Inc. and has served in this capacity since 2007. He has held a variety of high-level finance, operational, and marketing positions with AT&T, including serving as Chief Operating Officer from 2004 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in 2007 and as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004. He began his career with the Company in 1982. Mr. Stephenson received his B.S. in accounting from Central State University (now known as the University of Central Oklahoma) and earned his Master of Accountancy degree from the University of Oklahoma.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Executive (Chair)
Past Directorships The Boeing Company (2016-2017); Emerson Electric Co. (2006-2017) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Stephensons qualifications to serve on the Board include his more than 35 years of experience in the telecommunications industry, his intimate knowledge of our Company and its history, his expertise in finance and operations management, and his years of executive leadership experience across various divisions of our organization, including serving as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, and Senior Vice President of Consumer Marketing.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Extensive Knowledge of the Companys Business and/or Industry | |||||||||
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
Public Company Board Service and Governance Experience
|
||||||||
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 9 | |
Voting Items
|
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.
|
Age 67 Director since 2015 | |||||||||
|
Mr. Di Piazza served as Global Chief Executive Officer of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (an international professional services firm) from 2002 until his retirement in 2009. Mr. Di Piazza began his 36-year career with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC, formerly Coopers & Lybrand) in 1973 and was named Partner in 1979 and Senior Partner in 2000. From 1979 to 2002, Mr. Di Piazza held various regional leadership positions with PwC. After his retirement from PwC, Mr. Di Piazza joined Citigroup where he served as Vice Chairman of the Global Corporate and Investment Bank from 2011 until 2014. Since 2010, Mr. Di Piazza has served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The Mayo Clinic. He received his B.S. in accounting from the University of Alabama and earned his M.S. in tax accounting from the University of Houston. He served as a Director of DIRECTV from 2010 until the company was acquired by AT&T Inc. in 2015.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Audit (Chair); Executive; Public Policy and Corporate Reputation
Other Public Company Directorships Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated; ProAssurance Corporation; Regions Financial Corporation
Past Directorships DIRECTV (2010-2015) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Di Piazzas qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive leadership skills, his vast experience in public accounting with a major accounting firm, and his experience in international business and affairs, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T. His qualifications also include his prior service as a Director of DIRECTV, a digital entertainment services company that we acquired.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience |
Extensive Knowledge of the Companys Business and/or Industry | |||||||||
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
|
Global Business/Affairs Experience
|
|||||||
Richard W. Fisher
|
Age 68 Director since 2015 | |||||||||
|
Mr. Fisher served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from 2005 until March
2015. He has been Senior Advisor to Barclays PLC (a financial services provider) since July 2015. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Fisher was Vice Chairman and Managing Partner of Kissinger McLarty Associates (a strategic advisory firm). From 1997 to 2001,
Mr. Fisher served as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative with the rank of Ambassador. Previously, he served as Managing Partner of Fisher Capital Management and Fisher Ewing Partners LP (investment advisory firms) and prior to that was Senior Manager
of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (a private banking firm). He is an Honorary Fellow of Hertford College, Oxford University, and a
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate
Development
Other Public Company Directorships PepsiCo, Inc.; Tenet Healthcare |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Fishers qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive financial, trade and regulatory expertise, and a deep understanding of Mexico and Latin America, all of which enable him to provide valuable financial and strategic insight to AT&T.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Government/Regulatory Expertise |
|||||||||
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
Global Business/Affairs Experience
|
||||||||
| 10 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Scott T. Ford
|
Age 55 Director since 2012 | |||||||||
|
Mr. Ford founded Westrock Group, LLC (a private investment firm in Little Rock, Arkansas) in 2013, where he has served as Member and Chief Executive Officer since its inception. Westrock Group operates Westrock Coffee Company, LLC (a fully integrated coffee company), which Mr. Ford founded in 2009, and where he has served as Chief Executive Officer since 2009. Westrock Group also operates Westrock Asset Management, LLC (a global alternative investment firm), which Mr. Ford founded in 2014, and where he has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer since 2014. Mr. Ford previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alltel Corporation (a provider of wireless voice and data communications services) from 2002 to 2009, and served as an executive member of Alltel Corporations board of directors from 1996 to 2009. He also served as Alltel Corporations President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Ford led Alltel through several major business transformations, culminating with the sale of the company to Verizon Wireless in 2009. Mr. Ford received his B.S. in finance from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate Development and Finance (Chair); Executive; Human Resources
Other Public Company Directorships Bear State Financial, Inc. |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Fords qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience and expertise in the telecommunications industry, his strong strategic focus, his leadership experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company, and his experience in international business and private equity, all of which bring valuable contributions to AT&Ts strategic planning and industry competitiveness.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Extensive Knowledge of the Companys Business and/or Industry | |||||||||
|
Public Company Board Service and Governance Experience | Investment/Private Equity Experience
|
||||||||
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 11 | |
Voting Items
|
Glenn H. Hutchins
|
Age 62 Director since 2014 |
|
Mr. Hutchins is Co-Founder of North Island (a financial services technology investment firm based in New York, New York) which was founded in 2017. Mr. Hutchins has served as Chairman of Tide Mill, LLC (the Hutchins family office, formerly North Island, LLC, in New York, New York) since 2004. He is also Co-Founder of Silver Lake (a technology investment firm based in New York, New York and Menlo Park, California) which was founded in 1999, and where Mr. Hutchins served as Co-CEO until 2011 and as Managing Director from 1999 until 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Hutchins was Senior Managing Director at The Blackstone Group (a global investment firm) from 1994 to 1999. Mr. Hutchins served as Chairman of the Board of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (a software and technology services company) from 2005 until 2015. He is a Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Vice Chairman of the Brookings Institution. Previously, Mr. Hutchins served as a Special Advisor in the White House on economic and health-care policy from 1993 to 1994 and as Senior Advisor on the transition of the Administration from 1992 to 1993. He holds an A.B. from Harvard College, an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate
Development
Other Public Company Directorships Virtu Financial, Inc.
Past Directorships Nasdaq, Inc. (2005-2017) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Hutchins qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive experience and expertise in the technology and financial sectors, his public policy experience, and his strong strategic focus, all of which enable him to provide valuable financial and strategic insight to AT&T.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Government/Regulatory Expertise
|
|||||||||
|
Technology Expertise
|
Investment/Private Equity Experience
|
||||||||
William E. Kennard
|
Age 61 Director since 2014 |
|
Mr. Kennard served as the United States Ambassador to the European Union from 2009 to 2013. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Kennard was Managing Director of The Carlyle Group (a global asset management firm) where he led investments in the telecommunications and media sectors. Mr. Kennard served as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission from 1997 to 2001. Before his appointment as FCC Chairman, he served as the FCCs General Counsel from 1993 until 1997. Mr. Kennard joined the FCC from the law firm of Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson and Hand (now DLA Piper) where he was a partner and member of the firms board of directors. Mr. Kennard received his B.A. in communications from Stanford University and earned his law degree from Yale Law School.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate Governance and Nominating; Public Policy and Corporate Reputation
Other Public Company Directorships Duke Energy Corporation; Ford Motor Company; MetLife, Inc. |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Kennards qualifications to serve on our Board include his expertise in the telecommunications industry, his understanding of public policy, and his international perspective, as well as his background and experience in law and regulatory matters, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Government/Regulatory Expertise |
|||||||||
|
Extensive Knowledge of the Companys Business and/or Industry
|
Legal Experience
|
||||||||
| 12 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Michael B. McCallister
|
Age 65 Director since 2013 | |||||||||
|
Mr. McCallister served as Chairman of Humana Inc. (a health care company in Louisville, Kentucky) from 2010 to 2013. He also served as Humanas Chief Executive Officer from 2000 until his retirement in 2012. During Mr. McCallisters tenure, he led Humana through significant expansion and growth, nearly quadrupling its annual revenues between 2000 and 2012, and led the company to become a FORTUNE 100 company. Mr. McCallister received his B.S. in accounting from Louisiana Tech University and earned his M.B.A. from Pepperdine University.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Audit; Human Resources
Other Public Company Directorships Fifth Third Bancorp; Zoetis Inc.
Past Directorships Humana Inc. (2000-2013) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. McCallisters qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive leadership experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company and his depth of experience in the health care sector, which is of increasing importance to a company like AT&T.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Public Company Board Service and Governance Experience
|
|||||||||
|
Healthcare Expertise
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
||||||||
Beth E. Mooney
|
Age 63 Director since 2013 | |||||||||
|
Ms. Mooney is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KeyCorp (a bank holding company in Cleveland, Ohio) and has served in this capacity since 2011. She previously served as KeyCorps President and Chief Operating Officer from 2010 to 2011. Ms. Mooney joined KeyCorp in 2006 as a Vice Chair and head of Key Community Bank. Prior to joining KeyCorp, beginning in 2000 she served as Senior Executive Vice President at AmSouth Bancorporation (now Regions Financial Corporation), where she also became Chief Financial Officer in 2004. Ms. Mooney served as a Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland in 2016 and was appointed to represent the Fourth Federal Reserve District on the Federal Advisory Council beginning in 2017. She received her B.A. in history from the University of Texas at Austin and earned her M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate
Development
Other Public Company Directorships KeyCorp |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Ms. Mooneys qualifications to serve on the Board include her executive leadership skills in the oversight of a large, publicly traded and highly-regulated company and her more than 30 years of experience in the banking and financial services industry, which bring valuable financial and strategic insight to AT&T.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Government/Regulatory Expertise
|
|||||||||
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
Public Company Board Service and Governance Experience
|
||||||||
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 13 | |
Voting Items
|
Joyce M. Roché
|
Age 70 Director since 1998 | |||||||||
|
Ms. Roché is an author and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Girls Incorporated (a national nonprofit research, education, and advocacy organization in New York, New York) from 2000 until her retirement in 2010. Ms. Roché was an independent marketing consultant from 1998 to 2000. She was President and Chief Operating Officer of Carson, Inc. from 1996 to 1998 and Executive Vice President of Global Marketing of Carson, Inc. from 1995 to 1996. Prior to that, Ms. Roché held various senior marketing positions, including Vice President of Global Marketing for Avon Products, Inc. from 1993 to 1994. Ms. Roché received her B.A. in math education from Dillard University and earned her M.B.A. in marketing from Columbia University. Ms. Roché served as a Director of Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation from 1997 until the company was acquired by AT&T (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 1998.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate Governance and Nominating; Executive; Human Resources (Chair)
Other Public Company Directorships Macys, Inc.; Tupperware Brands Corporation
Past Directorships Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (2011-2017) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Ms. Rochés qualifications to serve on the Board include her executive leadership experience and operations management skills in dealing with complex organizational issues. Her expertise in general management and consumer marketing are key benefits to AT&T. Her qualifications also include her prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Extensive Knowledge of the Companys Business and/or Industry | |||||||||
|
Marketing Expertise
|
|
Public Company Board Service and Governance Experience
|
|||||||
Matthew K. Rose
|
Age 58 Director since 2010 | |||||||||
|
Mr. Rose is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (a freight rail system based in Fort Worth, Texas and a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., formerly known as Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation) and has served in this capacity since 2002, having also served as President until 2010. Before serving as its Chairman, Mr. Rose held several leadership positions there and at its predecessors, including President and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2002, President and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2000, and Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Rose also serves as Executive Chairman of BNSF Railway Company (a subsidiary of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC), having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2002 to 2013. He earned his B.S. in marketing from the University of Missouri.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair); Executive; Human Resources
Other Public Company Directorships BNSF Railway Company; Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC; Fluor Corporation
Past Directorships AMR Corporation (2004-2013) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Roses qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience in the executive oversight of a large, complex and highly-regulated organization, his considerable knowledge of operations management and logistics, and his experience and skill in managing complex regulatory and labor issues comparable to those faced by AT&T.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Government/Regulatory Expertise | |||||||||
|
Labor Experience
|
|
Operations/Logistics Experience
|
|||||||
| 14 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Cynthia B. Taylor
|
Age 56 Director since 2013 | |||||||||
|
Ms. Taylor is President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Oil States International, Inc. (a diversified solutions provider for the oil and gas industry in Houston, Texas) and has served in this capacity since 2007. She previously served as Oil States International, Inc.s President and Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007 and as its Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2006. Ms. Taylor was Chief Financial Officer of L.E. Simmons & Associates, Inc. from 1999 to 2000 and Vice President-Controller of Cliffs Drilling Company from 1992 to 1999, and prior to that, held various management positions with Ernst & Young LLP, a public accounting firm. She received her B.B.A. in accounting from Texas A&M University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Audit; Public Policy and Corporate Reputation
Other Public Company Directorships Oil States International, Inc.
Past Directorships Tidewater Inc. (2008-2017) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Ms. Taylors qualifications to serve on the Board include her executive leadership skills in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company, her vast experience in finance and public accounting, and her experience in international business and affairs, all of which bring a broad spectrum of management experience to our Board.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Global Business/Affairs Experience | |||||||||
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
Operations/Logistics Experience
|
||||||||
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 15 | |
Voting Items
|
Laura DAndrea Tyson
|
Age 70 Director since 1999 | |||||||||
|
Dr. Tyson is Distinguished Professor of the Graduate School, Haas School of Business, at the University of California at Berkeley (UC Berkeley) and has served in this capacity since July 2016. She is also the Chair of the Blum Center for Developing Economies Board of Trustees, UC Berkeley, and has served in this capacity since 2007. She has also been Faculty Director of the Institute for Business and Social Impact at the Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, since 2013. Dr. Tyson was Professor of Business Administration and Economics at the Universitys Haas School of Business from 2007 until June 2016 and was Professor of Global Management at the Haas School of Business from 2008 until 2013. Prior to that, Dr. Tyson was Dean of London Business School, London, England, from 2002 until 2006. In her previous roles at UC Berkeley, Dr. Tyson served as Dean of the Haas School of Business from 1998 to 2001 and Professor of Economics and Business Administration from 1997 to 1998. Dr. Tyson has also served in various government roles, including serving as a member of the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Policy Board (2011-2013), the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness for the President of the United States (2011-2013), and the Economic Recovery Advisory Board to the President of the United States (2009-2011), and has also served as National Economic Adviser to the President of the United States (1995-1996) and as Chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers (1993-1995). Since 2007, Dr. Tyson has served as an adviser and faculty member of the World Economic Forum. Dr. Tyson received her B.A. in economics from Smith College and earned her Ph.D. in economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Tyson served as a Director of Ameritech Corporation from 1997 until the company was acquired by AT&T (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 1999.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Audit;
Executive; Public Policy and Corporate
Other Public Company Directorships CBRE Group, Inc.
Past Directorships Morgan Stanley (1997-2016); Silver Spring Networks, Inc. (2009-2018) |
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Dr. Tysons qualifications to serve on the Board include her expertise in economics and public policy, her experience as an advisor in various business and political arenas, and her vast knowledge of international business and affairs, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T. Her qualifications also include her prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Government/Regulatory Expertise | |||||||||
|
High Level of Financial Experience
|
|
Public Company Board Service and Governance Experience
|
|||||||
| 16 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Geoffrey Y. Yang
|
Age 59 Director since 2016 | |||||||||
|
Mr. Yang is a founding partner and Managing Director of Redpoint Ventures (a global private equity and venture capital firm based in Menlo Park, California) and has served in this capacity since 1999. Prior to founding Redpoint, Mr. Yang was a General Partner with Institutional Venture Partners (a private equity investment firm in Menlo Park, California), which he joined in 1987. Mr. Yang has over 30 years of experience in the venture capital industry and has helped found or served on the boards of a variety of consumer media, internet, and infrastructure companies. Mr. Yang holds a B.S.E. in engineering from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.
|
|||||||||
AT&T Board Committees Corporate
Development
Other Public Company Directorships Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills, and Experience |
|||||||||
Mr. Yangs qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience in technology and emerging forms of media and entertainment, his decades of experience and expertise in venture capital, his strong strategic focus, as well as his vast experience in serving on the boards of private and public technology companies, all of which enable him to provide valuable contributions to AT&Ts financial and strategic planning and industry competitiveness.
|
||||||||||
Senior Leadership/Chief Executive Officer Experience | Global Business/Affairs Experience | |||||||||
|
Investment/Private Equity Experience
|
Technology Expertise
|
||||||||
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 17 | |
Voting Items
|
Management Proposal
Item 3. Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
Guiding Pay Principles (discussed in detail on page 55)
Alignment with Stockholders |
Provide compensation elements and set performance targets that closely align executives interests with those of stockholders. For example, approximately 68% of target pay for NEOs is tied to stock price performance. In addition, we have executive stock ownership guidelines and stock holding requirements, as described on page 76. Each of the NEOs exceeds the minimum stock ownership guidelines.
|
Competitive and Market Based |
Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate peer company practices to ensure we are able to attract and retain world-class talent with the leadership abilities and experience necessary to develop and execute business strategies, obtain superior results, and build long-term stockholder value in an organization as large and complex as AT&T.
|
Pay for Performance |
Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of predetermined goals and recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to our success. For example, in 2017, 93% of the CEOs target compensation (and, on average, 89% for other NEOs) was variable and tied to short- and long-term performance incentives, including stock price performance.
|
Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus |
Ensure that the compensation program provides an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business and mitigating risk.
|
Alignment with Generally Accepted Approaches |
Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies.
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 19 | |
Voting Items
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 21 | |
Voting Items
|
| 22 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Certain stockholders have advised the Company that they intend to introduce at the 2018 Annual Meeting the proposals set forth below. The names and addresses of, and the number of shares owned by, each such stockholder will be provided upon request to the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T at 208 S. Akard Street, 29th floor, Dallas, Texas 75202.
| 24 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Stockholder Proposal
Item 6. Prepare Lobbying Report
Whereas, we believe in full disclosure of our companys direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our companys lobbying is consistent with AT&Ts expressed goals and in the best interests of shareholders.
Resolved, the stockholders of AT&T request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:
1. | Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications. |
2. | Payments by AT&T used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient. |
3. | AT&Ts membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation. |
4. | Description of managements and the Boards decision making process and oversight for making payments described in section 2 and 3 above. |
For purposes of this proposal, a grassroots lobbying communication is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. Indirect lobbying is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which AT&T is a member.
Both direct and indirect lobbying and grassroots lobbying communications include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.
The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant oversight committees and posted on AT&Ts website.
Supporting Statement
As stockholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in AT&Ts use of corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation, both directly and indirectly. According to Senate reports, AT&T spent $80.3 million between 2012 and 2016 on federal lobbying activities. This figure does not include lobbying expenditures to influence legislation in states where AT&T also lobbies, but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, AT&T spent $4.2 million lobbying in California in 2015 and 2016. (http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/).
AT&T does not disclose its memberships in, or payments to trade associations, or the portions of such amounts used for lobbying. Company assets could be used for objectives contrary to AT& Ts longterm interests. AT&T sits on the board of the Chamber of Commerce, which has spent approximately $1.3 billion on lobbying since 1998. While AT&T recognizes climate change is a serious concern warranting meaningful action, the Chamber publicly attacked the EPAs solutions addressing climate change.
AT&T is also actively involved in the Business Roundtable (BRT) which is lobbying and leading a campaign attacking investors righst to file shareholder resolutions. AT&Ts dues to the BRT help support questionable campaigns like the BRTs.
And AT&T does not disclose its membership in tax-exempt organizations that write and endorse model legislation, such as American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC has promoted legislation to repeal state renewable energy standards. More than 100 companies, including Emerson Electric, General Electric, Google, Sprint and T-Mobile, have publicly left ALEC because of their public policy advocacy
This resolution received over 35% vote in 2017.
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 25 | |
Voting Items
|
× |
The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal. |
| 26 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Stockholder Proposal
Item 7. Modify Proxy Access Requirements
Proposal 7Stockholder Proxy Access Amendments
RESOLVED: Stockholders of AT&T Inc. (the Company) ask the board of directors (the Board) to amend its proxy access bylaw provisions and any associated documents, to include the following changes for the purpose of (1) decreasing the average amount of Company common stock the average member of a nominating group would be required to hold for three years to satisfy the aggregate ownership requirements to form a nominating group, (2) decreasing the barriers for renomination, and (3) increasing the potential number of nominees:
1. | No limitation shall be placed on the number of stockholders that can aggregate their shares to achieve the 3% of common stock required to nominate directors under our Companys proxy access provisions. |
2. | No limitation shall be placed on the re-nomination of stockholder nominees based on the number or percentage of votes received in any election. |
3. | The number of stockholder nominees eligible to appear in proxy materials shall be one quarter of the directors then serving or two, whichever is greater. |
Supporting Statement:
Under current provisions, even if the 20 largest public pension funds were able to aggregate their shares, they would not meet the 3% holding criteria at most of companies examined by the Council of Institutional Investors. Allowing an unlimited number of shareholders to aggregate shares would facilitate greater participation by individuals and institutional investors in meeting the stock ownership requirements, 3% of the outstanding common stock entitled to vote.
The SECs universal proxy access Rule 14a-11 (https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2010/33-9136.pdf) was vacated after a court decision regarding the SECs cost-benefit analysis. Therefore, proxy access rights must be established on a company-by-company basis. Subsequently, a cost-benefit analysis by CFA Institute, Proxy Access in the United States: Revisiting the Proposed SEC Rule (http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/pdf/10.2469/ccb.v2014.n9.1), found proxy access would benefit both the markets and corporate boardrooms, with little cost or disruption, raising US market capitalization by up to $140.3 billion.
Proxy Access: Best Practices 2017 (http://www.cii.org/files/publications/misc/Proxy_Access_2017 FINAL.pdf) by the Council of Institutional Investors (CII), notes that while proxy access has gained broad acceptance, some adopting companies have included, or are considering including, provisions that could significantly impair shareholders ability to use it. The report highlights the best practices CII recommends for implementing proxy access.
Although the Companys Board adopted a proxy access bylaw, it contains troublesome provisions that significantly impair the ability of shareholders to participate because of the large average amount of common shares each is required to hold for three years given the current aggregation limit of 20, the ability of shareholder nominees to run again, and the ability of shareholder nominees to effectively serve if elected. Adoption of all the requested amendments would come closer to meeting best practices as described by CII. Last year dozens of funds voted FOR a similar proposal at our Company, including Wells Fargo Advisors, Invesco Advisors and PNC Capital Advisors.
Increase Stockholder Value
Vote for Stockholder Proxy Access AmendmentsProposal 7
× |
The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal. |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 27 | |
Voting Items
|
| 28 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
Stockholder Proposal
Proposal 8Independent Board Chairman
Shareholders request our Board of Directors to adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require henceforth that the Chair of the Board of Directors, whenever possible, to be an independent member of the Board. The Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next CEO transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement.
If the Board determines that a Chair who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chair who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chairman. This proposal requests that all the necessary steps be taken to accomplish the above.
Caterpillar is an example of a company recently changing course and naming an independent board chairman. Caterpillar had strongly opposed a shareholder proposal for an independent board chairman as recently as its 2016 annual meeting. Wells Fargo also reversed itself and named an independent board chairman in 2016.
According to Institutional Shareholder Services 53% of the Standard & Poors 1,500 firms separate these 2 positions- 2015 Board Practices, April 12, 2015. This proposal topic won 50%-plus support at 5 major U.S. companies in 2013 including 73%-support at Netflix.
Under the current AT&T structure Randall Stephenson, with the dual role of CEO and Chairman, received high negative votes in 2017 - 8% and running unopposed. Four AT&T directors proved it was possible to get less than 2% in negative votes in 2017.
Meanwhile Matthew Rose, our Lead Director, received 4% in negative votes. The AT&T Lead Director role may be weak because it does not appear that he can call a special meeting of shareholders according to our vague bylaws. It is not clear how many directors it would take to call a special shareholder meeting at AT&T.
An independent board chairman would have more time to devote to improving the qualifications of directors. Joyce Roché and Laura Tyson each had more than 18-years long-tenure. Longtenure can challenge the independence of any director no matter how qualified. Ms. Tyson was also tainted by her Kodak experience.
Cynthia Taylor received the highest 2017 negative votes 11 %. William Kennard was potentially distracted by work on 6 Boards.
Please vote to enhance Chairman of the Board oversight:
Independent Board ChairmanProposal 8
× |
The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal. |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 29 | |
Voting Items
|
Stockholder Proposal
Item 9. Reduce Vote Required for Written Consent
Proposal 9Right to Act by Written Consent
Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.
This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent. This proposal topic, sponsored by Kenneth Steiner of Great Neck, New York, received more than 40%-support at our 2014 annual meeting.
This vote would have been higher if small shareholders had the same access to corporate governance analytical information as large shareholders. Each shareholder proposal topic voted at our 2005 through 2017 annual meeting would have received a higher vote had our company printed the names of the proponents in the proxy. Shareholders appreciate knowing the specific proponent sponsoring each shareholder proposal.
Taking action by written consent in lieu of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. More than 100 Fortune 500 companies provide for shareholders to call special meetings and to act by written consent.
Adoption of this proposal can give shareholders greater standing to engage AT&T management in regard to board refreshment after the 2018 annual meeting. For instance Joyce Roché and Laura Tyson each had more than 18-years long-tenure. Long-tenure can detract from the independence of a director no matter how well qualified.
Please vote to increase our options to ensure board refreshment:
Right to Act by Written ConsentProposal 9
× |
The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal. |
| 30 | | www.att.com |
Voting Items
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 31 | |
Corporate Governance
|
Engaging with Stockholders
Communicating with your Board
Interested persons may contact the Lead Director or the non-management Directors by sending written comments through the Office of the Secretary of AT&T Inc., 208 S. Akard Street, 29th floor, Dallas, Texas 75202. The Office will either forward the original materials as addressed or provide Directors with summaries of the submissions, with the originals available for review at the Directors request.
|
The Role of the Board
Director Nomination Process
| 32 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
Board Composition and Refreshment
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 33 | |
Corporate Governance
|
Annual Multi-Step Board Evaluation
| 34 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
Director Independence
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 35 | |
Corporate Governance
|
Board Leadership Structure
Board Leadership Structure
| Chairman of the Board and CEO: Randall L. Stephenson |
| Lead Director: Matthew K. Rose |
| Audit, Human Resources, Corporate Governance and Nominating, Corporate Development and Finance, and Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committees composed entirely of independent Directors |
Duties and Responsibilities
|
Lead Independent Director
Randall Stephenson currently serves as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that having Mr. Stephenson serve in both capacities is in the best interests of AT&T and its stockholders because it enhances communication between the Board and management and allows Mr. Stephenson to more effectively execute the Companys strategic initiatives and business plans and confront its challenges. The Board believes that the appointment of a strong independent Lead Director and the use of regular executive sessions of the non-management Directors, along with the Boards strong committee system and substantial majority of independent Directors, allow it to maintain effective oversight of management.
| 36 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
From time to time the Board establishes permanent standing committees and temporary special committees to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. The Board has established six standing committees of Directors, the principal responsibilities of which are described below. The charters for each of these committees may be found on our website at www.att.com.
Audit Committee
| ||||
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 12
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr., Chair ∎ Michael B. McCallister Cynthia B. Taylor ∎ Laura D. Tyson
∎ Financial Expert
Consists of four independent Directors. |
Oversees:
- the integrity of our financial statements
- the independent auditors qualifications and independence
- the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors
- our compliance with legal and regulatory matters.
Responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditor.
The independent auditor audits the financial statements of AT&T and its subsidiaries.
|
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
| ||||
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 4
Matthew K. Rose, Chair Richard W. Fisher William E. Kennard Beth E. Mooney Joyce M. Roché
Consists of five independent Directors. |
Responsible for recommending candidates to be nominated by the Board for election by the stockholders, or to be appointed by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies, consistent with the criteria approved by the Board, and recommending committee assignments.
Periodically assesses AT&Ts Corporate Governance Guidelines and makes recommendations to the Board for amendments and also recommends to the Board the compensation of Directors.
Takes a leadership role in shaping corporate governance and oversees an annual evaluation of the Board.
|
Human Resources Committee
| ||||
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 5
Joyce M. Roché, Chair Scott T. Ford Michael B. McCallister Matthew K. Rose Geoffrey Y. Yang
Consists of five independent Directors. |
Oversees the compensation practices of AT&T, including the design and administration of employee benefit plans.
Responsible for:
- establishing the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers
- establishing stock ownership guidelines for officers and developing a management succession plan.
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 37 | |
Corporate Governance
|
Corporate Development and Finance Committee
| ||||
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 5
Scott T. Ford, Chair Richard W. Fisher Glenn H. Hutchins Beth E. Mooney Geoffrey Y. Yang
Consists of five independent Directors. |
Assists the Board in its oversight of our finances, including recommending the payment of dividends and reviewing the management of our debt and investment of our cash reserves.
Reviews mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and similar transactions; reviews corporate strategy and recommends or approves transactions and investments.
Reviews and makes recommendations about the capital structure of the Company, and the evaluation, development and implementation of key technology decisions.
|
Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee
| ||||
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 3
Laura D. Tyson, Chair Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. Glenn H. Hutchins William E. Kennard Cynthia B. Taylor
Consists of five independent Directors. |
Assists the Board in its oversight of policies related to corporate social responsibility including public policy issues affecting AT&T, its stockholders, employees, customers, and the communities in which it operates.
Oversees the Companys management of its brands and reputation.
Recommends to the Board the aggregate amount of contributions or expenditures for political purposes, and the aggregate amount of charitable contributions to be made to the AT&T Foundation.
Consults with the AT&T Foundation regarding significant grants proposed to be made by the Foundation. |
Executive Committee
| ||||
Randall L. Stephenson, Chair Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. Scott T. Ford Joyce M. Roché Matthew K. Rose Laura D. Tyson
Consists of the Chairman of the Board and the Chairmen of our five other standing committees. |
Established to assist the Board by acting upon urgent matters when the Board is not available to meet. No meetings were held in 2017.
Has full power and authority of the Board to the extent permitted by law, including the power and authority to declare a dividend or to authorize the issuance of common stock.
|
| 38 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
Corporate Social Responsibility
AT&Ts Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) approach is based on the foundational belief in the interconnection of our long-term business success and the strength of our communities and world.
CSR progress validated through listings on Dow Jones Sustainability North America Index, Bloomberg Gender Equality Index, FTSE4Good Index, Euronext Vigeo Eiris World 120 and US 50 Indices, and Climate Change Leadership Tier of the Carbon Disclosure Project. Our sustainability report at about.att.com/csr/reporting contains comprehensive goals, metrics and issue briefs which align to Global Reporting Initiative guidelines. More information at about.att.com/csr.
* 2016 actuals, but largely representative of annual impact.
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 39 | |
Corporate Governance
|
Public Policy Engagement
Boards Role in Risk Oversight
Ethics and Compliance Program
| 40 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominees
| 42 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
2017 Compensation
|
Amount ($)
|
|||
Annual Retainer
|
|
140,000
|
| |
Lead Director Retainer
|
|
60,000
|
| |
Audit Committee and Human Resources Committee Chairs Retainer
|
|
25,000
|
| |
All other Committee Chairs Retainer
|
|
15,000
|
| |
Annual Award (1)
|
|
170,000
|
| |
Communications Equipment and Services (2)
|
|
up to 25,000
|
|
1. | Under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan (the Director Plan) each non-employee Director annually receives a grant of deferred stock units. Each deferred stock unit is equivalent to a share of AT&T stock and earns dividend equivalents in the form of additional deferred stock units. The annual grants are fully earned and vested at issuance and are distributed beginning in the calendar year after the Director leaves the Board. At distribution, the deferred stock units are converted to cash based on the then price of AT&T stock and are paid either in a lump sum or in up to 15 annual installments. Beginning in 2016, the deferred stock units have a grant date value of $170,000. To determine the number of deferred stock units granted, we calculate the nominal value of the award, which is the value that would yield the grant date value after applying an illiquidity discount. We use the average remaining tenure of the non-employee Directors as the discount period. We then divide the nominal value by the price of AT&T stock on the grant date to determine the number of deferred stock units issued. |
Additionally, Directors may defer the receipt of their retainers into either additional deferred stock units or into a cash deferral account under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan. Directors purchase the deferred stock units at the fair market value of AT&T common stock. Deferrals into the cash deferral account under the plan earn interest during the calendar year at a rate equal to the Moodys Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for September of the preceding year (Moodys Rate). Directors may annually choose to convert their cash deferral accounts into deferred stock units at the fair market value of our stock at the time of the conversion. Directors may also use all or part of their retainers to purchase AT&T stock at fair market value under the Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan. |
To the extent earnings on cash deferrals under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan exceed the interest rate specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for disclosure purposes, they are included in the Director Compensation table on page 44 under the heading Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings.
2. | Non-employee Directors may receive communications equipment and services pursuant to the AT&T Board of Directors Communications Concession Program. The equipment and services that may be provided to a Director, other than at his or her primary residence, may not exceed $25,000 per year. All concession services must be provided by AT&T affiliates, except that the Director may use another provider for the Directors primary residence if it is not served by an AT&T affiliate. |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 43 | |
Corporate Governance
|
2017 Director Compensation Table
The following table contains information regarding compensation provided to each person who served as a Director during 2017 (excluding Mr. Stephenson, whose compensation is included in the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure).
Name
|
Fees Earned ($) (a)
|
Stock ($) (b)
|
Nonqualified ($) (c)
|
All Other ($) (d)
|
Total ($)
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.
|
$
|
165,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
$
|
360,000
|
| ||||||||||
Richard W. Fisher
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
$
|
325,678
|
| ||||||||||
Scott T. Ford
|
$
|
155,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
| ||||||||||
Glenn H. Hutchins
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
30,485
|
|
$
|
340,485
|
| ||||||||||
William E. Kennard
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
22,500
|
|
$
|
332,500
|
| ||||||||||
Michael B. McCallister
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
310,000
|
| ||||||||||
Beth E. Mooney
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
| ||||||||||
Joyce M. Roché
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
11,934
|
|
$
|
351,934
|
| ||||||||||
Matthew K. Rose
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
28,558
|
|
$
|
408,558
|
| ||||||||||
Cynthia B. Taylor
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
11,871
|
|
$
|
321,871
|
| ||||||||||
Laura DAndrea Tyson
|
$
|
155,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
10,065
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
335,065
|
| ||||||||||
Geoffrey Y. Yang
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
$
|
321,537
|
|
Note (a). Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
The table below shows the number of deferred stock units purchased in 2017 by each Director with their Board fees and/or retainers under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan.
Director
|
Deferred Stock Units
| ||||
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.
|
|
4,303
|
| ||
Glenn H. Hutchins
|
|
3,651
|
| ||
Beth E. Mooney
|
|
3,651
|
| ||
Joyce M. Roché
|
|
2,211
|
| ||
Matthew K. Rose
|
|
5,503
|
|
In addition, the following table shows the number of shares of AT&T common stock purchased in 2017 by each Director with their retainers under the Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan.
Director
|
Shares Purchased
| ||||
Michael B. McCallister
|
|
1,824
|
|
Note (b). Stock Awards
Amounts in this column represent the annual grant of deferred stock units that are immediately vested but are not distributed until after the retirement of the Director. The grant date value was determined by applying an illiquidity discount of 22%. The illiquidity discount was determined by taking the average expected remaining tenure of the Directors (9.0 years) and then using that average to calculate the illiquidity discount under FASB ASC Topic 718. The nominal value of each award (before applying the discount) was $217,949. The deferred stock units will be paid out in cash in the calendar year after the Director ceases his or her service with the Board, at the times elected by the Director. The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2017, for each Director can be found in the Common Stock Ownership section on page 45.
| 44 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
Note (c). Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
Amounts shown represent the excess earnings, if any, based on the actual rates used to determine earnings on deferred compensation over the market interest rates determined pursuant to SEC rules.
Note (d). All Other Compensation
Amounts in this column include personal benefits for Directors that in the aggregate equal or exceed $10,000, which for 2017 consisted of communications equipment and services provided under the AT&T Board of Directors Communications Concession Program (described on page 43) and holiday gifts, as follows: Mr. Hutchins ($15,031 and $454, respectively), Mr. Rose ($13,104 and $454, respectively), Ms. Taylor ($11,417 and $454, respectively) and Mr. Yang ($11,083 and $454, respectively).
All Other Compensation also includes charitable matching contributions of up to $15,000 per year made by the AT&T Foundation on behalf of Directors and employees under the AT&T Higher Education/Cultural Matching Gift Program. Charitable contributions were made on the Directors behalf under this program as follows:
Name
|
Matching Gifts
| ||||
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.*
|
|
$25,000
|
| ||
Richard W. Fisher
|
|
$15,000
|
| ||
Glenn H. Hutchins
|
|
$15,000
|
| ||
William E. Kennard*
|
|
$22,500
|
| ||
Beth E. Mooney
|
|
$15,000
|
| ||
Joyce M. Roché
|
|
$11,934
|
| ||
Matthew K. Rose
|
|
$15,000
|
|
* | For Messrs. Di Piazza and Kennard, $10,000 and $7,500, respectively, relate to contributions made in 2016. |
Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table lists the beneficial ownership of each person holding more than 5% of AT&Ts outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2017 (based on a review of filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedules 13D and 13G).
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature
|
Percent of Class
| ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10055
|
|
376,827,658
|
(1)
|
|
6.10
|
%
| ||||
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
439,421,300
|
(2)
|
|
7.15
|
%
|
1. | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 8, 2018, which reported the following: sole voting power of 322,053,134 shares; shared voting power of 0 shares; sole dispositive power of 376,827,658 shares, and shared dispositive power of 0 shares. |
2. | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 8, 2018, which reported the following: sole voting power of 8,615,524 shares; shared voting power of 1,362,157 shares; sole dispositive power of 429,664,340 shares, and shared dispositive power of 9,756,960 shares. |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 45 | |
Corporate Governance
|
Directors and Officers
The following table lists the beneficial ownership of AT&T common stock and non-voting stock units as of December 31, 2017, held by each Director, nominee, and officer named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 78. As of that date, each Director and officer listed below, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, owned less than 1% of our outstanding common stock. Except as noted below, the persons listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities indicated.
| 46 | | www.att.com |
Corporate Governance
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 47 | |
Audit Committee Report
|
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and discussed with management AT&Ts audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017; (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and (4) discussed with the auditors the auditors independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, be included in AT&Ts Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
February 12, 2018 | The Audit Committee | |||
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr., Chairman | Cynthia B. Taylor | |||
Michael B. McCallister | Laura DAndrea Tyson |
AT&T has a separately designated standing Audit Committee. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which may be viewed on the Companys web site at www.att.com. The Audit Committee performs a review and reassessment of its charter annually. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of AT&Ts financial statements, the independent auditors qualifications and independence, the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors, and AT&Ts compliance with legal and regulatory matters.
The Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors in accordance with the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and AT&T. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Di Piazza (Chairman), Mr. McCallister, Ms. Taylor, and Dr. Tyson, each of whom was appointed by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Di Piazza and Ms. Taylor are audit committee financial experts and are independent as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and in accordance with AT&Ts additional standards. Although the Board of Directors has determined that these individuals have the requisite attributes defined under the rules of the SEC, their responsibilities are the same as those of the other Audit Committee members. They are not AT&Ts auditors or accountants, do not perform field work and are not full-time employees. The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed to be an expert for any purpose as a result of being identified as an audit committee financial expert.
Primary Responsibilities
| 48 | | www.att.com |
Audit Committee Report
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 49 | |
Audit Committee Report
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Ernst & Young LLP acts as AT&Ts principal auditor and also provides certain audit-related, tax and other services. The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy for services to be performed by Ernst & Young. Under this policy, the Audit Committee approves specific engagements when the engagements have been presented in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee before services are undertaken.
This policy also allows for the approval of certain services in advance of the Audit Committee being presented details concerning the specific service to be undertaken. These services must meet service definitions and fee limitations previously established by the Audit Committee. Additionally, engagements exceeding $500,000 must receive advance concurrence from the Audit Committee Chairman. After an auditor is engaged under this authority, the services must be described in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee at the next meeting.
All pre-approved services must commence, if at all, within 14 months of the approval.
The fees for services provided by Ernst & Young (all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee) to AT&T in 2017 and 2016 are shown below.
Principal Accountant Fees (dollars in millions)
|
||||||||
Item
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||
Audit Fees (a)
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
$
|
30.7
|
| ||
Audit Related Fees (b)
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
3.3
|
| ||
Tax Fees (c)
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
11.4
|
| ||
All Other Fees (d)
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
| 50 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Committee Report
The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.
|
February 12, 2018 | The Human Resources Committee | |||
Joyce M. Roché, Chairman | Michael B. McCallister | |||
Scott T. Ford | Matthew K. Rose | |||
Geoffrey Y. Yang |
Topic
|
Page
|
|||
52 | ||||
55 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
57 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
Determination of Award Payouts for Performance Periods Ending December 31, 2017 |
61 | |||
66 | ||||
71 | ||||
73 | ||||
73 | ||||
73 | ||||
76 | ||||
76 | ||||
77 |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 51 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Executive Summary
|
Our Human Resources Committee (Committee) takes great care to develop and refine an executive compensation program that recognizes its stewardship responsibility to our stockholders while ensuring the availability of talent to support a culture of growth, innovation, and performance in an extraordinarily large and complex organization.
In this section, we summarize the elements of our compensation program, how our program supports pay for performance, and our key performance achievements.
Topic | Overview | More Information |
||||||
The foundation of our program | Our Committee believes that our programs should: |
Page 55 | ||||||
|
be aligned with stockholder interests, |
|||||||
|
be competitive and market-based, |
|||||||
|
pay for performance, |
|||||||
|
balance both short- and long- term focus, and |
|||||||
|
be aligned with generally accepted approaches. |
|||||||
To that end, we incorporate many best practices in our compensation program and avoid ones that are not aligned with our guiding pay principles. |
||||||||
Stockholder Engagement | Each year, we engage with large stockholders to understand their views on executive compensation. In light of their feedback, results of the
stockholder advisory vote on our executive compensation program, and market trends, the Committee adjusts our compensation program periodically as it determines to be appropriate. |
Page 57 | ||||||
Our compensation program elements and percentage of pay tied to performance and stock price |
|
Our program includes a number of different elements, from fixed compensation (base salaries) to performance-based variable compensation (short- and long-term incentives), to key benefits, which minimize distractions and allow our executives to focus on our success. | Page 57 | |||||
|
Each element is designed for a specific purpose, with an overarching goal of encouraging a high level of sustainable individual and Company performance well into the future. | |||||||
|
For Named Executive Officers (NEOs), the combination of short- and long- term incentives ranges from 87% to 93% of target pay. Payouts are formula-driven for: short-term incentives; and performance shares (which represent 75% of the long-term incentive). |
|||||||
|
All long-term grants are tied to our stock price performance. | |||||||
|
Our Committee retains the authority to increase or decrease final award payouts, after adjustment for financial performance, to ensure pay is aligned with performance. | |||||||
How we make compensation decisions | The starting point for determining Executive Officer compensation is an evaluation of market data. Our consultant compiles compensation information for our peer companies and then presents this information to our Committee for it to consider when making compensation decisions. Our peer companies were chosen based on their similarity to AT&T on a number of factors, including alignment with our business, scale, and/or complexity. | Page 59 |
| 52 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Executive Summary
|
2017 Company Performance Highlights
1 Among full service wireless providers, J.D. Power presents the Purchase
Experience award twice a year. The |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 53 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Executive Summary
|
Highlights of Incentive Payouts
2017 Short Term Award
Metric
|
Metric
|
Attainment
|
Payout%
|
|||||||||
2017 Earnings per Share (EPS)
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
84
|
%
| |||
2017 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
103
|
%
|
|
106
|
%
| |||
Weighted Average Payout
|
|
90
|
%
|
Long Term Award Performance Share Component
2015-2017 Performance Period
Metric
|
Metric
|
Attainment
|
Payout%
|
|||||||||
3-Year Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
7.75%
|
|
|
104
|
%
| |||
3-Year Relative Total Stockholder Return (TSR)
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
100
|
%
| |||
Weighted Average Payout
|
|
103
|
%
|
After the impact of change in stock price over the 2015 2017 performance period, our NEOs received approximately 122% of their original performance share grant value.
The narrative on the following pages more fully describes how the Committee, with the input of its consultant, has designed and evolved our Executive Officer compensation and benefits program using the Committees guiding pay principles as the pillars of the program. The narrative also outlines how we establish pay targets and how actual Executive Officer pay is determined. Finally, we provide a description of other benefits.
| 54 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Role of the Human Resources Committee
The Committees charter is available on our website at www.att.com. Our Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors. The current members of the Committee are: Ms. Roché (Chairman), Mr. Ford, Mr. McCallister, Mr. Rose, and Mr. Yang. Our Committee is responsible for:
Compensation-related Tasks
|
Organizational Tasks
| |
Determining the compensation for our Executive Officers, including salary and short- and long-term incentive opportunities; Reviewing, approving, and administering our executive compensation plans, including our stock plans; Establishing performance objectives under our short- and long-term incentive compensation plans; Determining the attainment of those performance objectives and the awards to be made to our Executive Officers; Evaluating Executive Officer compensation practices to confirm that these practices remain equitable and competitive; and Approving employee benefit plans, as needed. |
Evaluating the performance of the CEO; Reviewing the performance and capabilities of the other Executive Officers, based on input from the CEO; and Reviewing succession planning for Executive Officer positions including the CEOs position. |
Our Committee has designed an executive compensation program that encourages our leaders to produce outstanding financial and operational results, create sustainable long-term value for our stockholders, and lead the company with ethics and integrity. Our guiding pay principles are:
Alignment with Stockholders |
Provide compensation elements and set performance targets that closely align executives interests with those of stockholders. For example, approximately 69% of target pay for NEOs is tied to stock price performance. In addition, we have executive stock ownership guidelines and stock holding requirements, as described on page 76. |
Competitive and Market Based |
Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate peer company practices to ensure we are able to attract and retain world-class talent with the leadership abilities and experience necessary to develop and execute business strategies, obtain superior results, and build long-term stockholder value in an organization as large and complex as AT&T. |
Pay for Performance |
Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of predetermined goals and recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to our success. For example, in 2017, 93% of the CEOs target compensation (and, on average, 90% for other NEOs) was variable and tied to short- and long-term performance incentives, including stock price performance. |
Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus |
Ensure that the compensation program provides an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business and mitigating risk. |
Alignment with Generally Accepted Approaches |
Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies. |
These guiding pay principles serve as the pillars of our compensation and benefits program and any potential changes to the program are evaluated in light of their ability to help us meet these goals.
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 55 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Checklist of Compensation Practices
Our compensation program is designed around the following market-leading practices:
Practices We Use | Practices We Dont Use | |||
ü Pay for Performance: Tie compensation to performance by setting clear and challenging performance goals. The vast majority of Executive Officer compensation is tied to performance metrics and/or stock price performance.
ü Multiple Performance Metrics and Time Horizons: Use multiple performance metrics and multi-year vesting timeframes to discourage unnecessary short-term risk taking.
ü Stock Ownership and Holding Period Requirements: NEOs must comply with stock ownership guidelines and hold the equivalent of 25% of post-2015 stock distributions until retirement.
ü Regular Engagement with Stockholders: We engage with large stockholders no less than annually regarding executive compensation matters.
ü Dividend Equivalents: Paid at the end of the performance period on earned performance shares.
ü Annual Compensation-Related Risk Review: Performed annually to confirm that our programs do not encourage excessive risk taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
ü Clawback Policy: Provides for the recovery of previously paid executive compensation for any fraudulent or illegal conduct.
ü Severance Policy: Limits payments to 2.99 times salary and target bonus. |
û No Single Trigger Change in Control Provisions: No accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.
û No Tax Gross-Ups: No excise tax gross-up payments; no other tax gross-ups, except in extenuating circumstances.
û No Credit for Unvested Shares when determining compliance with stock ownership guidelines.
û No Repricing or Buy-Out of underwater stock options.
û No Hedging or Short Sales of AT&T stock.
û No Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits for officers promoted/hired after 2008.
û No Guaranteed Bonuses.
û No Excessive Dilution: Our annual equity grants represent 1% of the total outstanding Common Stock each year. As of July 31, 2017, our total dilution was 1.0% of outstanding Common Stock. |
| 56 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Executive Compensation Program Enhancements
The Committee took into account feedback from our 2016 outreach to large stockholders when making the following enhancements to our program:
2017 Program Enhancements
Changes | Rationale | |||
Replaced the three peer groups used to assess market-based compensation and benefits practices with a single peer group of 20 companies (shown on page 59). | ² | Simplifies our program. The new peer group consists of companies that better compare to our scale and complexity of business operations. | ||
Eliminated our historical practice of targeting Executive Officer pay at the 62nd percentile of market. | ² | Allows the Committee to more accurately target pay for each Executive Officer position based on the positions scope, complexity, and importance to the business. | ||
Changed long-term incentive pay mix: from 50% performance shares / 50% restricted stock units to 75% performance shares / 25% restricted stock units. |
² | A larger portion of long-term compensation is tied to performance, providing better alignment between pay and performance. | ||
Changed long-term incentive performance measures: from 75% ROIC and 25% relative TSR to 100% ROIC, with a relative TSR payout modifier, as described in the table on page 72. |
² | Long-term awards are designed to focus executives on ROIC. AT&T is a capital-intensive business; ROIC is an appropriate performance metric to ensure we effectively employ capital and provide a strong return on it to stockholders. However, we will use relative TSR as a performance metric (as a payout modifier) because it further aligns our executives interests with those of our stockholders. |
During 2017 and early 2018, we again met with large stockholders and stockholder advisory groups to discuss their perspectives on our compensation and benefits practices. The Committee considers these perspectives when making changes to our compensation program. Of the votes cast at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 90.88% were in favor of the advisory vote on executive compensation.
It is in our stockholders interest that our compensation program be structured to make attraction, retention, and motivation of the highest quality talent a reality. Our executive compensation and benefits program includes a number of different elements, designed for different purposes, with an overarching goal to encourage a high level of sustainable individual and Company performance well into the future:
Current Year Performance | + | Multi-Year Performance | + | Attraction & Retention | ||||||||||||
Salary and Short-Term Incentives |
Long-Term Incentives (75% Performance Shares and 25% Restricted Stock Units) |
Retirement, Deferral/Savings Plans, Benefits, and Personal Benefits |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 57 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
The chart below more fully describes the three elements of total direct compensation and their link to our business and talent strategies.
Weightings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reward Element |
Form | Link to Business and Talent Strategies |
CEO | Other NEOs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
| Provides compensation to assume the day-to-day responsibilities of the position. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A portion may be deferred into AT&T stock. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Pay |
| Pay level recognizes experience, skill, and performance, with the goal of being market-competitive.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary
|
7 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjustments may be made based on individual performance, pay relative to other executives, and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pay relative to market. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
| Aligns pay with the achievement of short-term objectives.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A portion may be deferred into AT&T stock. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Incentives (see page 61)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payouts based on achievement of predetermined goals, with potential for upward or downward adjustment by the Committee to align pay with performance. | 24 | % | 21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At Risk Pay |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives (see page 63) |
75% Performance Shares (paid 34% in stock, 66% in cash)
25% Restricted Stock Units (paid in stock) |
| Motivates and rewards the achievement of long-term performance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | % | 69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aligns executive and stockholder interests. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 58 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Determining 2017 Target Compensation
The starting point for determining Executive Officer compensation begins with an evaluation of market data. The consultant compiles this data from both proxy and compensation surveys conducted by third parties for companies in the peer group selected by the Committee.
How the peer group was chosen
|
The Committees compensation consultant developed the peer group with input from the Committee and from management based on the following criteria: similarityto AT&T in terms of size, organizational and business complexity, and/or industry, globalscope of operations and/or diversified product lines, abilityof the company to compete with AT&T for talent, and similarityto jobs at AT&T in terms of complexity and scope of officer positions.
|
Following is the peer group our consultant used to assess market-based compensation for Executive Officers in 2017.
2017 Peers
| ||||||
Alphabet Amazon Apple Boeing Chevron
|
Cisco Comcast Exxon Mobil General Electric HP Enterprise
|
Intel IBM Microsoft Oracle Sprint
|
Time Warner Inc. T-Mobile US Verizon Communications Wal-Mart Walt Disney
| |||
Note: These same 20 companies are also used to determine our relative TSR performance for the 2017 performance share grant.
|
The consultant reviewed the market data for the peer groups with members of management and the CEO (for officers other than himself) to obtain their views on the relative value of each position and differences in responsibilities between our jobs and those in the comparator groups.
The Committee reviewed the market data and the CEOs compensation recommendations for the other Executive Officers and then applied their judgment and experience to set Executive Officer compensation for the coming year. When setting compensation, the Committee may determine that Executive Officers with significant experience and responsibilities or who demonstrate exemplary performance have higher target compensation, while less experienced Executive Officers may have lower target compensation.
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 59 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
AT&T is a leading provider of communications and digital entertainment services in the United States and in the world. During 2017, we continued to successfully execute on our strategic goals, delivering strong operating and financial results while also making progress on our growth initiatives.
To put in perspective the scale, scope, and complexity of our business as compared to our 20 compensation benchmark companies (as shown on page 59), below is a comparison of Market Cap, Revenues, and Net Income:
Comparison of Scope and Scale
AT&T and Peer Companies2 ($M)
For more information on our financial and operational performance, please see our Annual Report at www.att.com.
| 60 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
We provide returns through both robust dividends and stock price appreciation. We continue to deliver consistent, positive returns to our stockholders over the long-term and have a long history of increasing dividends.
Determination of Award Payouts for Performance Periods Ending December 31, 2017
2017 Short-Term Incentive Plan Metrics and Performance Attainment
After reviewing our business plan and determining the business metrics on which our Executive Officers should focus, the Committee established the following performance targets applicable to payment of short-term awards for 2017:
2017 Short-Term Incentive Performance Metrics |
Relevance of Metric | Metric Weight |
Threshold Performance Payout% |
Target Performance Payout% |
Maximum Performance Payout% | |||||
Earnings per Share | Indicator of profitability and a window into our long-term sustainability | 70% | Performance achievement of 80% of target results in a 50% payout
No payout for
|
100%
|
Performance achievement of 130% of target results in a 150% payout
| |||||
Free Cash Flow | Important to continue to invest, pay down debt, and provide strong dividends to our stockholders | 30% | ||||||||
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 61 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
The following chart shows the: performance goals, actual performance attainment, payout percentage for each performance metric, and overall weighted average award payout for short-term awards.
* The Committee made certain discretionary adjustments that had the effect of reducing the short term award payout. The adjustments were made to exclude certain events that were not contemplated when the FCF performance target was set. Accordingly, the Committee excluded the FCF positive impacts of certain vendor financing and an amount equal to an expected tax payment that did not occur in 2017. In addition, although permitted by the terms of the award, the Committee determined not to adjust for other M&A transaction costs because they were already included in the FCF performance target. |
In accordance with our formulaic approach, the NEOs each received a performance-adjusted award payout of 90%. The Committee maintains the ability to make further adjustments to the formula-driven payout as it deems appropriate in order to ensure alignment of Executive Officer pay with performance. Adjustments may not exceed 200% of the Executive Officers performance-adjusted target award.
| 62 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics and Performance Attainment Performance/Restriction Periods Ending in 2017
Long-Term Incentive Plan Form |
Weight | Performance Metrics and Vesting Period | Description | |||||
Performance Shares Granted in 2015 | 50% | 3-year performance period (2015-2017)
Performancemetrics: 75% ROIC 25% Relative TSR
Payout value based on combination of performance attainment and stock price performance. |
Each performance share is equal in value to a share of stock, which causes the value of the award to fluctuate directly with changes in our stock price over the performance period.
The cash payment value of the performance shares is based on our stock price on the date an award payout is approved.
Because awards are based on a 3-year performance period, they maximize the leverage of both short- and long-term performance. The impact of a single years performance is felt in each of the three performance share grants that are outstanding at any given time, so that strong performance must be sustained every year in order to provide favorable payouts.
Dividend equivalents are paid at the end of the performance period, based on the number of performance shares earned. | |||||
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) Granted in 2014 | 50% | 4-year restriction period
Payout value based on stock price performance. |
We structure RSUs to be paid in stock at the end of the restriction period, regardless of whether they vest earlier. RSUs vest 100% after four years or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier. | |||||
ROIC Payout Table and Actual Performance Attainment 2015-2017 Performance Period
Determination of Performance Goal | ||
We established a performance target range of 6.75% to 7.5% at the beginning of the 3-year performance period. This target range does not penalize or reward Executive Officers for performance achievement within close proximity to the midpoint of the range. The lower end of the performance target range was set so that it exceeded our internally calculated cost of capital (determined, in part, based on input from banks) by 75 basis points, ensuring a reasonable return is delivered to stockholders before Executive Officers are eligible for full payout of their target award. | ||
Performance Below Target Range | ||
No payout is earned if less than 67% of the performance target range is achieved. Achievement below the target range results in decreasing levels of award payout. The payout drops to 0% of the performance shares tied to this metric if less than 67% of the low end of the target range is achieved. | ||
Performance within Target Range | ||
100% payout if performance falls within the target range. | ||
Performance Above Target Range | ||
Maximum payout of 150% is earned if 137% or more of the performance target range is achieved. Achievement above the target range provides for higher levels of award payout, up to the maximum payout. | ||
Actual Performance | ||
After conclusion of the performance period, the Committee determined (using the ROIC payout table) that we achieved a 7.75% ROIC, which was above the ROIC target range, and 175 basis points above the cost of capital we established based on input from banks. As a result, the Committee directed that 104% of the related performance shares be distributed. |
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 63 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
TSR Payout Table and Actual Performance Attainment 2015-2017 Performance Period
At the beginning of the performance period, the Committee established the following table for determining payout of the performance shares tied to the TSR metric. Our actual performance attainment is also shown:
As a result of the performance attainment achieved for the TSR performance metric, the Committee directed that 100% of the related performance shares be distributed.
| 64 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Percent of Grant Value Realized 2015 Performance Share Grant (2015-2017 Performance Period)
As a result of the combined ROIC and TSR performance attainment, each NEO received 103% of the number of shares granted.
75% of Performance Shares Granted |
Ó |
Payout Percentage of 104% for ROIC |
Ì | 25% of Performance Shares Granted |
Ó |
Payout Percentage of 100% for TSR |
= |
103% of Shares to be Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
However, the performance shares were also subject to stock price fluctuation over the 3-year performance period as another element of our long-term incentive pay-for-performance design. Based on the $6.20 change in our stock price from $32.96 at grant to $39.16 at payout, the value of the shares actually payable increased 18.8% over the 3-year performance period.
Ending Stock Price of $39.16* |
- |
Beginning Stock Price of $32.96** |
÷ |
Beginning Stock Price of $32.96** |
= |
18.8% Growth in Stock Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As a result of both ROIC and relative TSR performance and the absolute change in our stock price, our NEOs realized approximately 122% of their original performance share grant value.
NEOs Received 122% of Original Grant Value |
Percent of Grant Value Realized 2014 Restricted Stock Units
Our 2014 restricted stock units had a 4-year vesting period and were paid in early 2018. The final value delivered from these awards was based on our stock price. Over the 4-year restriction period, the stock price increased $4.09 per share, delivering 112% of the original grant value.
Ending Stock Price of $37.44* |
- |
Beginning Stock Price of $33.35** |
÷ |
Beginning Stock Price of $33.35** |
= |
12% Growth in Stock Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEOs Received 112% of Original Grant Value |
* Stock price when award payout is approved for performance shares (typically the first Committee meeting after the end of the performance period), or the stock price on the last date of the restriction period for RSU grants.
** Stock price used to determine the number of shares to be granted (target award value is divided by this stock price).
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 65 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
Named Executive Officer Compensation
In this section we detail how each NEOs compensation was impacted by performance attainment. The following tables summarize the compensation our NEOs realized in 2017. The long-term grant values below do not align to what is reported in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) because the SCT reflects long-term grant values for 2017, whereas these tables show the values of the long-term distributions for awards with performance/restriction periods ending in 2017 or early 2018.
Randall Stephenson Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President | ||||
|
Mr. Stephenson has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President since 2007. Throughout his career at the Company, he has held a variety of high-level finance, operational, and marketing positions, including serving as Chief Operating Officer from 2004 until his appointment to Chief Executive Officer in 2007, and as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004. He began his career with the Company in 1982. | |||
2017 Realized Compensation | ||||
Element of Compensation |
Compensation Amount |
Rationale | ||
2017 Base Salary |
$1,800,000
|
Mr. Stephensons salary did not increase in 2017. | ||
2017 Short Term Incentive Award (STIP) |
Target Award = $5,900,000
|
Mr. Stephensons STIP payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 90% of his target award based on EPS and FCF performance attainment. No discretionary adjustment was made by the Committee. | ||
Final Award Paid = $5,310,000
|
||||
90% of target award value realized
|
||||
Performance Share Payout (2015-2017 Performance Period) |
Target Award = $7,375,000 |
Mr. Stephensons performance share payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 103% of the 223,756 shares granted based on the Companys performance achievement for ROIC and relative TSR, plus The companys stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which increased the value of the shares earned by 18.8%.
Performance Shares were paid in cash. | ||
Final Award Paid = $9,025,154
|
||||
122% of grant value realized
|
||||
Restricted Stock Unit Payout (2014 Grant) |
Target Award = $7,250,000
|
The companys stock price change over the 4-year vesting period increased the value of the units granted by 12%.
Restricted Stock Units were paid in stock.
| ||
217,391 shares paid; valued at $8,139,119
|
||||
112% of grant value realized
|
| 66 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
John Stephens Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
|
John Stephens has 25 years of service with the Company. Mr. Stephens was appointed to his current position in 2011. He has responsibility for financial planning, corporate development, accounting, tax, auditing, treasury, investor relations, corporate real estate and shared services. Prior to his current position, Mr. Stephens held a series of successive positions in the finance department. Before joining the Company, Mr. Stephens held a variety of roles in public accounting. | |||
2017 Realized Compensation | ||||
Element of Compensation |
Compensation Amount* |
Rationale | ||
2017 Base Salary | $979,167 | Consistent with market-based data and his strong performance in 2016, Mr. Stephens received a 14.3% base salary increase to $1,000,000 effective March 1, 2017. | ||
2017 Short Term Incentive Award (STIP) |
Target Award = $1,900,000
|
Mr. Stephens STIP payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 90% of his target award based on EPS and FCF performance attainment. No discretionary adjustment was made by the Committee. | ||
Final Award Paid = $1,710,000
|
||||
90% of target award value realized
|
||||
Performance Share Payout (2015-2017 Performance Period) |
Target Award = $2,350,000
|
Mr. Stephens performance share payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 103% of the 71,299 shares granted based on the Companys performance achievement for ROIC and relative TSR, plus The companys stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which increased the value of the shares earned by 18.8%.
Performance Shares were paid in cash. | ||
Final Award Paid = $2,875,831
|
||||
122% of grant value realized
|
||||
Restricted Stock Unit Payout (2014 Grant) |
Target Award = $2,185,000
|
The companys stock price change over the 4-year vesting period increased the value of the units granted by 12%.
Restricted Stock Units were paid in stock.
| ||
65,517 shares paid; valued at $2,452,956
|
||||
112% of grant value realized
|
* Upon the completion of the Time Warner Inc. merger, the Committee intends to reevaluate Mr. Stephens compensation, as appropriate, to recognize new duties.
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 67 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
John Donovan Chief Executive Officer, AT&T Communications, LLC | ||||
|
John Donovan has 9 years of service with the Company, and is the head of AT&T Communications, LLC, where he is responsible for the AT&T Business, Entertainment, and Technology & Operations groups, providing mobile, broadband, and video services to U.S. consumers, including nearly 3.5 million businesses. Until August 1, 2017, he was Chief Strategy Officer and Group President, overseeing corporate strategy and our Technology and Operations groups. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Donovan was Executive Vice President of Product, Sales, Marketing, and Operations at Verisign, Inc. From 2000 to 2006 he was Chairman and CEO of inCode Telecom Group, Inc.; prior to that he was a partner with Deloitte Consulting.
| |||
2017 Realized Compensation | ||||
Element of Compensation |
Compensation Amount |
Rationale | ||
2017 Base Salary |
$1,035,833
|
Consistent with market data and his strong performance in 2016, Mr. Donovan received a 15.6% base salary increase to $1,000,000 effective March 1, 2017. Effective September 1, 2017, Mr. Donovans base salary was increased from $1,000,000 to $1,175,000, a 17.5% increase to reflect the increased scope and complexity of his new job running one of the largest mobile, broadband, and video service companies in the U.S. | ||
2017 Short Term Incentive Award (STIP) |
Target Award = $2,183,333
|
Mr. Donovans target STIP was increased to $1,900,000 effective January 1, 2017, and to $2,750,000 effective September 1, 2017. Mr. Donovans award targets were applied to the associated time periods and the resulting weighted STIP target award for 2017 was $2,183,333.
Mr. Donovans STIP payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 90% of his target award based on EPS and FCF performance attainment. No discretionary adjustment was made by the Committee. | ||
Final Award Paid = $1,965,000
|
||||
90% of target award value realized
|
||||
Performance Share Payout (2015-2017 Performance Period) |
Target Award = $1,950,000
|
Mr. Donovans performance share payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 103% of the 59,163 shares granted based on the Companys performance achievement for ROIC and relative TSR, plus The companys stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which increased the value of the shares earned by 18.8%.
Performance Shares were paid in cash. | ||
Final Award Paid = $2,386,328
|
||||
122% of grant value realized
|
||||
Restricted Stock Unit Payout (2014 Grant) |
Target Award = $1,575,000
|
The companys stock price change over the 4-year vesting period increased the value of the units granted by 12%.
Restricted Stock Units were paid in stock.
| ||
47,226 shares paid; valued at $1,768,141
|
||||
112% of grant value realized
|
| 68 | | www.att.com |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
David McAtee Senior Executive Vice President and General Counsel | ||||
|
David McAtee has served at AT&Ts General Counsel since 2015. He has responsibility for all legal matters affecting AT&T, including the Companys litigation, regulatory, and compliance matters before various judicial and regulatory agencies, as well as all merger agreements, dispositions of non-strategic assets, commercial agreements, and labor contracts. In 2017, Mr. McAtee and his team successfully managed thousands of litigation matters involving AT&T, including approximately 120 appeals to various federal and state courts of appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. McAtee joined the company in 2012 as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel after 18 years in government and private practice. | |||
2017 Realized Compensation | ||||
Element of Compensation |
Compensation Amount |
Rationale | ||
2017 Base Salary | $791,667 | Consistent with market-based pay increases and his strong performance in 2016, Mr. McAtee received a 6.7% base salary increase from $750,000 to $800,000 effective March 1, 2017. | ||
2017 Short Term Incentive Award (STIP) |
Target Award = $1,500,000
|
Mr. McAtees STIP payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 90% of his target award based on EPS and FCF performance attainment. No discretionary adjustment was made by the Committee. | ||
Final Award Paid = $1,350,000
|
||||
90% of target award value realized
|
||||
Performance Share Payout (2015-2017 Performance Period) |
Target Award = $1,000,000
|
Mr. McAtees performance share payout was based on: A formulaic payout of 104% of the 8,343 shares granted with the sole performance metric of the Companys ROIC, and 103% of the 21,996 shares granted based on the Companys ROIC and relative TSR performance achievement, plus The companys stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which increased the value of the shares earned by 18.8%.
Performance Shares were paid in cash. | ||
Final Award Paid = $1,226,985
|
||||
123% of grant value realized
|
||||
Restricted Stock Unit Payout (2014 Grant) |
Target Award = $262,500
|
The companys stock price change over the 4-year vesting period increased the value of the units granted by 12%.
Restricted Stock Units were paid in stock.
| ||
7,871 shares paid; valued at $294,690
|
||||
112% of grant value realized
|
AT&T 2018 Proxy Statement | | 69 | |
|