Edgar Filing: REVLON INC /DE/

DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨	Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x	Definitive Proxy Statement

¨	Definitive Additional Materials

¨	Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

REVLON, INC.

(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x	No fee required.

¨	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

REVLON, INC.

237 PARK AVENUE

NEW YORK, NY 10017

April 25, 2013

Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Revlon, Inc., which will be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 6, 2013, at Revlon’s Research Center at 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818. The matters to be acted upon at the meeting are described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Please also see the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement for important information that you will need in order to pre-register for admission to the meeting, if you plan to attend in person.

While stockholders may exercise their right to vote their shares in person, we recognize that many stockholders may not be able to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting. In accordance with rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we are mailing to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (instead of a paper copy of the Proxy Statement and our 2012 Annual Report) which contains instructions on how stockholders can access the proxy materials over the Internet and vote electronically. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how stockholders can receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including the Proxy Statement, the 2012 Annual Report and a form of proxy card. Our proxy materials are being furnished to stockholders on or about April 25, 2013.

Whether or not you plan to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares, regardless of the number of shares you hold, by utilizing the voting options available to you as described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and our Proxy Statement. This will not restrict your right to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person, should you wish to change your prior vote.

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

Alan T. Ennis

President and Chief Executive Officer

REVLON, INC.

237 PARK AVENUE

NEW YORK, NY 10017

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders of Revlon, Inc.

The 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Revlon, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 6, 2013, at Revlon’s Research Center at 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818. The following proposals will be voted on at the 2013 Annual Meeting:

1. the election of the following persons as members of the Company’s Board of Directors to serve until the next annual stockholders’ meeting and until such directors’ successors are elected and shall have been qualified: Ronald O. Perelman, Alan S. Bernikow, Diana F. Cantor, Viet D. Dinh, Alan T. Ennis, Meyer Feldberg, David L. Kennedy, Cecelia Kurzman, Debra L. Lee, Tamara Mellon, Barry F. Schwartz and Kathi P. Seifert;

2. the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013; and

3. the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the 2013 Annual Meeting.

A Proxy Statement describing the matters to be considered at the 2013 Annual Meeting accompanies this notice. Only stockholders of record at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 12, 2013 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2013 Annual Meeting and at any adjournments thereof. For at least ten days prior to the 2013 Annual Meeting, a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting will be available for inspection during normal business hours at the offices of the Company’s Secretary at 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, and such list also will be available at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the June 6, 2013 Annual

Stockholders’ Meeting:

We are delivering our Proxy Statement and 2012 Annual Report under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules that require companies to make proxy materials available to their stockholders over the Internet and to furnish notice of Internet access to such materials. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to all of our stockholders (stockholders who have a request for paper copies on file with our transfer agent or their broker will receive paper copies of our proxy materials in the mail). A paper copy of our proxy materials may be requested through one of the methods described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Our Proxy Statement, including the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and our 2012 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com (where stockholders may also vote their shares, over the Internet) and at www.revloninc.com.

Whether or not you plan to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting, your vote is important. Please promptly submit your proxy by Internet, telephone or mail by following the instructions found on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card. Your proxy can be withdrawn by you at any time before it is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

If you plan to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting in person, you should check the appropriate box on your proxy card (or indicate that you will attend when prompted by electronic voting means which you may access) indicating that you intend to do so. You will need to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, in order to be admitted to the meeting. If your shares are held other than as a stockholder of

record (such as beneficially through a brokerage, bank or other nominee account), you will need to present original documents (copies will not be accepted) to evidence your stock ownership as of the April 12, 2013 record date, such as an original of a legal proxy from your bank or broker (“Requests for Admission” will not be accepted), your brokerage account statement demonstrating that you held Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock (“voting capital stock”) in your account on the April 12, 2013 record date, or, if you did not already return it to your bank or broker, an original voting instruction form issued by your bank or broker, demonstrating that you held Revlon, Inc. voting capital stock in your account on the April 12, 2013 record date. Please see our Proxy Statement for information on how to pre-register for the meeting, should you wish to attend.

As previously disclosed, in September 2008, the Company completed a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of its Class A and Class B Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”) pursuant to which each ten (10) shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A and Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to 11:59 p.m. on September 15, 2008 were automatically combined into one (1) share of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, respectively, subject to the elimination of fractional shares. The Company has determined that stockholders who have not yet surrendered their shares to the Company’s transfer agent for exchange in connection with the Reverse Stock Split will be considered stockholders of record and will be permitted to receive these proxy materials, vote their shares (after giving effect to the 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split) and attend the 2013 Annual Meeting.

In order to expedite the admission registration process, we encourage stockholders to pre-register in accordance with the pre-registration procedures set forth in our Proxy Statement.

Thank you.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Michael T. Sheehan

Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel

and Secretary

April 25, 2013

PLEASE PROMPTLY SUBMIT YOUR VOTE BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS FOUND ON YOUR NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS, VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM OR PROXY CARD. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR WISHES.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY			S-i
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING			i
PROXY STATEMENT			1
Required Identification and Other Instructions for Attendees at the 2013 Annual Meeting			1
Solicitation and Voting of Proxies; Revocation			2
Record Date; Voting Rights			3
Distribution of Proxy Materials; Costs of Distribution and Solicitation			4
Householding of Stockholder Materials			4
PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			4
Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation (Proposal No. 1)			4
Nominees for Election as Directors			5
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			9
Board of Directors and its Committees			9
Standing Committees			9
Controlled Company Exemption			9
Number of Board and Committee Meetings			9
Director Attendance at Annual Stockholders’ Meeting			10
Board Leadership Structure			10
Audit Committee			12
Composition of the Audit Committee			12
Audit Committee Charter			12
Audit Committee Responsibilities			12
Audit Committee Complaint Procedures			12
Audit Committee Report			13
Compensation Committee			14
Composition of the Compensation Committee			14
Compensation Committee Charter			14
Compensation Committee’s Responsibilities			14
Compensation Committee’s Delegation of Authority			14
Role of Officers and Consultants in the Compensation Committee’s Deliberations			14
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			15
Compensation Committee Report			15
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee			15
Composition of the Governance Committee			15
Governance Committee Charter			15
Governance Committee Responsibilities			15
Director Nominating Processes; Diversity			15
Stockholder Process for Submitting Director Nominees			16
Stockholder-Director Communications			16
Non-Management Executive Sessions			17
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			18
RISK MANAGEMENT			19
Relationship of Compensation Practices to Risk Management			19
Risk Oversight			19


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS			19
Overview of 2012 Compensation Events			19
Objectives of the Company’s Compensation Program and What it is Designed to Reward			21
Each Element of Compensation and Why the Company Chooses to Pay It			21
Setting Pay; Market References			22
Total Compensation			22
Base Salary			22
Incentive Compensation; Generally			22
Incentive Compensation; Annual Cash Bonus			25
Incentive Compensation; Long-Term Compensation			26
Other Compensation and Benefit Programs			27
How the Company Determines the Amount (and, Where Applicable, the Formula) for Each Element of Compensation to Pay and How Each Compensation Element and the Company’s Decisions Regarding that Element Fit into the Company’s Overall Compensation Objectives and May Affect Decisions Regarding Other Elements of Compensation			27
Role of the Compensation Committee			27
Whether and, if so, How the Company has Considered the Results of the Most Recent Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation in Determining its Compensation Policies and Decisions.			28
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation			28
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			30
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE			30
Employment Agreements and Payments Upon Termination and Change of Control			32
Termination Payments			32
Change of Control Payments			36
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS			39
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END			41
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED			42
PENSION BENEFITS			43
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION			45
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION			47
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			48
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION			50
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS			50
Transfer Agreements			50
Reimbursement Agreements			51
Tax Sharing Agreements			52
Registration Rights Agreement			53
Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan			53
Contribution and Stockholder Agreement			55
Fidelity Stockholders’ Agreement			56
Other			56
Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons			57
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICER CODE OF ETHICS			57
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE			58


PROPOSAL NO. 2 — RATIFICATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE’S SELECTION OF KPMG LLP			58
Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation (Proposal No. 2)			59
AUDIT FEES			59
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS			60
VOTING THROUGH THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE			60
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION			61
OTHER BUSINESS			61
2012 COMPARISON GROUP			Annex A-1
REVLON, INC. 2013 AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICY			Annex B-1

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The following description is only a summary; for more information, you should carefully read and consider the entire Proxy Statement, as well as the Company’s 2012 Annual Report, before voting on the matters presented in this Proxy Statement.


2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Time & Date		10:00 a.m., June 6, 2013
Place		Revlon Research Center 2121 Route 27 Edison, NJ 08818
Record Date		April 12, 2013
Voting		Each share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of the Company’s Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes.
Admission		Stockholders of record on the Record Date may attend the 2013 Annual Meeting upon presentation of appropriate admission materials; pre-registration is encouraged; see the “Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting” section of this Proxy Statement for more information.
Meeting Agenda		1. Election of Directors. 2. Ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. 3. Transact such other business that may properly be brought before the meeting.
Voting Matters
Item		Board Vote Recommendation
1. Election of Directors		For each Director nominee.
2. Ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013		For.

Board Nominees

The following table provides summary information about each Director nominee. Each Director nominee is a current standing Director of the Company (other than Ms. Cantor, who is a new nominee). Each Director is elected annually by a plurality of votes cast.


Name	Revlon Director Since	Independent	Committee Memberships	Committee Chairman

Ronald O. Perelman (Chairman)	1992

Alan S. Bernikow	2003	X	Audit; Compensation	Audit; Compensation

Diana F. Cantor	—	X

Viet D. Dinh	2012	X	Nominating & Corporate Governance

Alan T. Ennis	2009

Meyer Feldberg	1997	X	Audit; Nominating & Corporate Governance	Nominating & Corporate Governance

David L. Kennedy	2006

Cecelia Kurzman	2013	X

Debra L. Lee	2006	X	Nominating & Corporate Governance

Tamara Mellon	2008	X

Barry F. Schwartz	2007		Compensation

Kathi P. Seifert	2006	X	Audit; Compensation

Auditors

As a matter of good corporate practice, the Company is asking its stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. Set forth below is a summary of information with respect to KPMG LLP’s fees for services provided in 2012 and 2011 (dollars are in millions).


Types of Fees	2012		2011
Audit Fees	$	3.9	$	3.8
Audit-Related Fees		0.2		0.2
Tax Fees		0.2		0.2
All Other Fees		—		—

TOTAL FEES	$	4.3	$	4.2

S-ii

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Q.	*Why am I receiving these proxy materials?*

Our Board of Directors is providing this Proxy Statement and other materials to you in connection with the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This Proxy Statement describes the matters proposed to be voted on at the 2013 Annual Meeting, including the election of directors, the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013, and such other business as may properly come before the 2013 Annual Meeting. The approximate date when these proxy materials are being made available to you is April 25, 2013.

Q.	*Why did I receive a notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?*

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to all stockholders entitled to vote at our 2013 Annual Meeting, we are making the proxy materials and our 2012 Annual Report available to our stockholders electronically via the Internet. On or about April 25, 2013, we are sending to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”). The Internet Notice contains instructions on how stockholders may access and review our proxy materials and our 2012 Annual Report over the Internet and vote electronically, as well as instructions on how stockholders can request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including the 2013 Proxy Statement, the 2012 Annual Report and a form of proxy card. Otherwise, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials (unless you already had a request for paper copies on file with our transfer agent or your broker). Instead, the Internet Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials and submit your vote via the Internet. If you would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Internet Notice for requesting printed materials.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the June 6, 2013 Annual

Stockholders’ Meeting:

Our 2013 Proxy Statement, including the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and 2012 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com (where stockholders may also vote their shares, via the Internet) and at www.revloninc.com.

Q.	How can I request paper copies of proxy materials?

You will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request them. There is no charge imposed by the Company for requesting a copy. To request paper copies, stockholders can (i) go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions posted for requesting materials, (ii) call 1-800-579-1639 or (iii) send an email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If you request materials by email, send a blank email with your Control Number(s) (located in the Internet Notice) in the subject line. To facilitate timely delivery of paper copies of requested materials, please make your paper copy request no later than May 23, 2013.

Q.	When and where is the 2013 Annual Meeting?

A.	The 2013 Annual Meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 6, 2013, at Revlon’s Research Center at 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818.

Q.	*What is the purpose of the 2013 Annual Meeting?*

A.	At the 2013 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders will act upon the following matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

•

the election of the following persons as members of the Company’s Board of Directors to serve until the next annual stockholders’ meeting and until such directors’ successors are elected and shall have

been qualified: Ronald O. Perelman, Alan S. Bernikow, Diana F. Cantor, Viet D. Dinh, Alan T. Ennis, Meyer Feldberg, David L. Kennedy, Cecelia Kurzman, Debra L. Lee, Tamara Mellon, Barry F. Schwartz and Kathi P. Seifert (if any nominee is unable or declines unexpectedly to stand for election as a director at the 2013 Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors may by resolution provide for a lesser number of directors or designate substitute nominees and proxies will be voted for any such substitute nominee);

•

the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013; and

•

the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Q.	*What are the voting recommendations of the Board?*

A.	The Board recommends the following votes:

•

FOR each of the director nominees; and

•

FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013.

Q.	*What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?*

Many holders of the Company’s voting capital stock hold such shares through a broker or other nominee (i.e., a beneficial owner) rather than directly in their own name (i.e., a stockholder of record). As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

•

Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being made available, electronically or otherwise, directly to you by the Company. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the Company or a third party, or to vote in person at the 2013 Annual Meeting. The Company has made available a proxy card or electronic voting means for you to use for voting purposes.

•

Reverse Stock Split. As previously disclosed, in September 2008, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of its Class A and Class B Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”) pursuant to which each ten (10) shares of Revlon Class A and Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to 11:59 p.m. on September 15, 2008 were automatically combined into one (1) share of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, respectively, subject to the elimination of fractional shares. The Company has determined that stockholders who have not yet surrendered their shares to the Company’s transfer agent for exchange in connection with the Reverse Stock Split will be considered stockholders of record and will be permitted to receive these proxy materials, vote their shares (after giving effect to the 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split) and attend the 2013 Annual Meeting.

•

Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being made available, electronically or otherwise, by the Company to your broker, nominee or trustee and they should forward these materials to you, together with a voting instruction form if furnished via paper copy to your broker, trustee or nominee.

Q.	*How do I vote?*

A.	You may vote using one of the following methods:

Internet. For all holders of our voting capital stock (whether a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner), to vote through the Internet, log on to the Internet and go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the steps on the secure website (have your Internet Notice or your proxy card available as you will need to reference your assigned Control Number(s)). You may vote on the Internet up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 5, 2013, which is the day before the June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting. If you vote by the Internet, you need not return your proxy card (if you received one), unless you wish to change your Internet vote.

Telephone. You may vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number on your proxy card up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 5, 2013, which is the day before the June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting, and following the pre-recorded instructions (have your Internet Notice or your proxy card available when you call as you will need to reference your assigned Control Number(s)). If you vote by telephone, you should not return your proxy card (if you received one), unless you wish to change your telephone vote.

Mail. If you received your proxy materials by mail, due to having a request for paper copies on file with our transfer agent or your broker, you may vote by mail by appropriately marking your proxy card, dating and signing it, and returning it in the postage-prepaid envelope provided, or to Vote Processing (Revlon), c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NJ 11717, for receipt prior to the closing of the voting polls for the June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting.

In Person. You may vote your shares in person by attending the 2013 Annual Meeting and submitting a valid proxy at the 2013 Annual Meeting. If you are a “registered owner” or “record holder” (i.e., you are listed as a stockholder on the books and records of our transfer agent), you may vote in person by submitting your previously furnished proxy or casting a voting capital stock ballot furnished by the Company at the Meeting prior to the closing of the polls; if you are a “beneficial owner” (i.e., your shares are held by a nominee, such as a bank or broker or in “street name”), you may not vote your shares in person at the 2013 Annual Meeting unless you obtain and present to the Company an original (copies will not be accepted) legal proxy from your bank or broker authorizing you to vote the shares (“Requests for Admission” will not be accepted).

Voting, Generally. All shares that have been voted properly by an unrevoked proxy will be voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. In relation to how your proxy will be voted, see “How will my proxy be voted?” below.

If you are a “beneficial owner” because your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization is the holder of record of your shares (i.e., your shares are held in “street name”), you will receive instructions on how to vote from your bank, broker or other record holder. You must follow these instructions in order for your shares to be voted. You should instruct your nominee on how to vote your shares. Your broker is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your broker, the broker may vote your shares only with respect to Proposal No. 2 (the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm), which is considered a “routine” matter, and not with respect to Proposal No. 1 (the election of directors).

Q.	*Who can vote?*

Only stockholders of record of Revlon, Inc. Class A and Class B Common Stock and Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 12, 2013, the record date for the 2013 Annual Meeting, or those who have been granted and present an original, signed, valid legal proxy in appropriate form from a holder of record of Revlon, Inc. Class A or Class B Common Stock or Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 12, 2013, are entitled to vote. Each share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes.

iii

As noted above, the Company has determined that stockholders who have not yet surrendered their old shares of Class A Common Stock to the Company’s transfer agent for exchange in connection with the Reverse Stock Split will be considered stockholders of record and will be permitted to receive these proxy materials, vote their shares (after giving effect to the 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split) and attend the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Q.	*How will my proxy be voted?*

Your proxy, when properly submitted to us, and not revoked, will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how you would like your shares to be voted, the persons designated by the Company as proxies will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors on Proposal No. 1 (the election of directors) and Proposal No. 2 (the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm).

Although we are not aware of any other matter that may be properly presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting, if any other matter is properly presented, the persons designated by the Company as proxies may vote on such matters in their discretion.

Q.	*Can I change or revoke my vote?*

A.	Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change or revoke your vote at any time before it is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting by:

•

executing and delivering a proxy bearing a later date, which must be received by the Company’s Secretary at 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Michael T. Sheehan, before the original proxy is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting;

•

filing a written revocation or written notice of change, as the case may be, which must be received by the Company’s Secretary at 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Michael T. Sheehan, before the original proxy is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting; or

•

attending the 2013 Annual Meeting and voting in person.

If you are a beneficial owner, please follow the voting instructions sent to you by your broker, trustee or nominee to change or revoke your vote.

To revoke a vote previously submitted electronically through the Internet or by telephone, you may simply vote again at a later date, using the same procedures, in which case the later submitted vote will be recorded and the earlier vote revoked.

Q.	*What if I am a participant in the Revlon 401(k) Plan?*

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to you if Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock is allocated to your account within the Revlon Employees’ Savings, Investment and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). The trustee of the 401(k) Plan, as the record holder of the Company’s shares held in the 401(k) Plan, will vote the shares allocated to your account under the 401(k) Plan in accordance with your instructions. If the trustee of the 401(k) Plan does not otherwise receive voting instructions for shares allocated to your 401(k) Plan Account, the trustee, in accordance with the 401(k) Plan trust agreement, will vote any such shares in the same proportion as it votes those shares allocated to 401(k) Plan participants’ accounts for which voting instructions were received by the trustee. 401(k) Plan participants must submit their voting instructions to the trustee of our 401(k) Plan in accordance with the instructions included with the proxy card or Internet Notice so that they are received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2013 to allow the trustee time to receive such voting instructions and vote on behalf of participants in the 401(k) Plan. Voting instructions received from 401(k) Plan participants after this deadline, under any method, will not be considered timely and will be voted by the trustee at the 2013 Annual Meeting in the manner described in this paragraph above for non-votes.

Q.	*Who can attend the 2013 Annual Meeting?*

Anyone who was a stockholder of the Company as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 12, 2013, the record date for the 2013 Annual Meeting, and who provides the necessary identification may attend the 2013 Annual Meeting. Directions to the address for the 2013 Annual Meeting are available on various Internet travel sites, or you may seek assistance from the Company when pre-registering.

To attend the 2013 Annual Meeting, please follow these instructions:

•

If you are a stockholder of record on the April 12, 2013 record date, check the appropriate box on the proxy card (or indicate that you will attend when prompted by electronic voting means which you may access) indicating that you plan on attending the 2013 Annual Meeting, and please present at the meeting a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport.

•

If you are a stockholder whose shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, please present at the meeting valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, as well as original proof of ownership of shares of Revlon, Inc. voting capital stock as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date, in order to be admitted to the 2013 Annual Meeting. As noted, you will need to present original evidence of stock ownership, such as an original of a legal proxy from your bank or broker (“Requests for Admission” will not be accepted), your brokerage account statement, demonstrating that you held Revlon, Inc. voting capital stock in your account as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date, or, if you did not already return it to your bank or broker, an original voting instruction form issued by your bank or broker, demonstrating that you held Revlon, Inc. voting capital stock in your account as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date.

In order to ensure the safety and security of our meeting attendees, packages and bags may be inspected and may have to be checked and, in some cases, may not be permitted. We thank you in advance for your cooperation with these security measures.

Q.	*Should I pre-register for the 2013 Annual Meeting?*

In order to expedite the admission registration process required for you to enter the 2013 Annual Meeting, we encourage stockholders to pre-register by phone by calling Amy Heidingsfelder, Associate Director, Legal Services, at (212) 527-5628, Meaghan Connerty, Senior Legal Assistant, Corporate and Budgeting, at (212) 527-5528, or Trevor Ezell, Corporate Legal Assistant, at (212) 527-5672, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, up until 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 (the day prior to the 2013 Annual Meeting). Stockholders pre-registering by phone will be admitted to the 2013 Annual Meeting by presenting valid picture identification and, if your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, original evidence of your stock ownership as of the April 12, 2013 record date.

Q.	*Can I bring a guest to the 2013 Annual Meeting?*

Yes. If you plan to bring a guest to the 2013 Annual Meeting, please provide us with advance notice of that pursuant to the pre-registration procedures for stockholders set forth in this Proxy Statement. When you go through the registration area at the 2013 Annual Meeting, please be sure your guest is with you. Guests must also present valid picture identification to gain access to the 2013 Annual Meeting. We reserve the right to limit guest attendance due to space limitations.

Q.	*Can I still attend the 2013 Annual Meeting if I have previously voted or returned my proxy?*

A.	Yes. Attending the 2013 Annual Meeting does not revoke a previously submitted valid proxy. See, “Can I Change or Revoke My Vote?” above.

Q.	*What shares are covered by my proxy card or electronic voting form?*

The shares covered by your proxy card or electronic voting form represent all of the shares of the Company’s voting capital stock that you own in the account referenced on the proxy card. Any shares that may be held for your account by the 401(k) Plan or another account will be represented on a separate proxy card and/or by a separate Control Number.

Q.	*What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?*

A.	It means you have multiple accounts at our transfer agent and/or with banks or stockbrokers. Please vote all of your shares.

REVLON, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on June 6, 2013

This Proxy Statement is being furnished on or about April 25, 2013 by and on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of Revlon, Inc. (the “Company” or “Revlon”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2013 Annual Meeting”) to be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 6, 2013, at Revlon’s Research Center at 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818, and at any adjournments thereof. The 2012 Annual Report furnished with our Proxy Statement does not form any part of the material for the solicitation of proxies.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are required to provide our stockholders with access to our proxy materials over the Internet, rather than only in paper form. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”), rather than a printed copy of the proxy materials, to our stockholders of record as of April 12, 2013. You will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you already had a request for paper copies on file with our transfer agent or your broker. If you want to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, you must request them through one of the methods identified elsewhere in this Proxy Statement or in the Internet Notice. There is no charge imposed by the Company for requesting paper copies. Our proxy materials, including the Internet Notice, are being made available to stockholders entitled to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

At the 2013 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders will be asked to: (1) elect the following persons as directors of the Company until the Company’s next annual stockholders’ meeting and until each such director’s successor is duly elected and has been qualified: Ronald O. Perelman, Alan S. Bernikow, Diana F. Cantor, Viet D. Dinh, Alan T. Ennis, Meyer Feldberg, David L. Kennedy, Cecelia Kurzman, Debra L. Lee, Tamara Mellon, Barry F. Schwartz and Kathi P. Seifert; (2) ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013; and (3) take such other action as may properly come before the 2013 Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, and its main telephone number is (212) 527-4000.

Required Identification and Other Instructions for Attendees at the 2013 Annual Meeting

In order to be admitted to the 2013 Annual Meeting in person, you should check the appropriate box on your proxy card (or indicate that you will attend when prompted by electronic voting means which you may access) indicating that you intend to attend in person and you will need to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, as well as original proof of ownership of shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date. If your shares are held other than as a stockholder of record (such as beneficially through a brokerage, bank or other nominee account), you will need to present original documents (copies will not be accepted) to evidence your stock ownership as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date, such as an original of a legal proxy from your bank or broker (“Requests for Admission” will not be accepted) or your brokerage account statement demonstrating that you held Revlon, Inc. voting capital stock in your account as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date, or, if you did not already return it to your bank or broker, an original voting instruction form issued by your bank or broker, demonstrating that you held Revlon, Inc. voting capital stock in your account as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the April 12, 2013 record date.

In order to expedite the admission registration process, we encourage stockholders to pre-register by phone by calling Amy Heidingsfelder, Associate Director, Legal Services, at (212) 527-5628, Meaghan Connerty, Senior Legal Assistant, Corporate and Budgeting, at (212) 527-5528, or Trevor Ezell, Corporate Legal Assistant, at (212) 527-5672, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, up until 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 (the day before the 2013 Annual Meeting). Stockholders pre-registering by phone will be admitted to the meeting by presenting valid picture identification and, if your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, original evidence of your stock ownership as of the April 12, 2013 record date. Directions to the address for the 2013 Annual Meeting are available on various Internet travel sites, or you may seek assistance from any of the above individuals when pre-registering.

In order to ensure the safety and security of our 2013 Annual Meeting attendees, packages and bags may be inspected and may have to be checked and, in some cases, may not be permitted. We thank you in advance for your cooperation with these security measures.

Solicitation and Voting of Proxies; Revocation

All proxies properly submitted to the Company, unless such proxies are properly revoked before they are voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting, will be voted on all matters presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions given by the person executing (or electronically submitting) the proxy or, in the absence of instructions, will be voted (1) FOR the election to the Board of Directors of each of the 12 nominees identified in this Proxy Statement; and (2) FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013 (see below for discussion of broker non-votes). The Company has no knowledge of any other matters to be brought before the meeting. The deadline for receipt by the Company of stockholder proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials for presentation at the 2013 Annual Meeting was December 25, 2012. The Company did not receive any proposals required to be included in these proxy materials.

Additionally, pursuant to the Company’s By-laws, in order for business to be properly brought before the 2013 Annual Meeting (other than stockholder proposals included in the proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and business specified in this Proxy Statement), notice of such business must have been received by the Company between March 9, 2013 and April 8, 2013 (and not subsequently withdrawn) and such notice must have included, among other things: (i) information regarding the proposed business to be brought before such meeting; (ii) the identity of the stockholder proposing the business; and (iii) the class of the Company’s shares which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder. The Company did not receive notification of any such matters. If any other matters are properly presented before the 2013 Annual Meeting for action, however, in the absence of other instructions, it is intended that the persons named by the Company and acting as proxies will vote in accordance with their discretion on such matters.

The submission of a signed or validly submitted electronic proxy will not affect a stockholder’s right to change his, her or its vote, attend and/or vote in person at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Stockholders who execute a proxy or validly submit an electronic vote may revoke it at any time before it is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting by: (i) filing a written revocation or written notice of change, as the case may be, which must be received by the Company’s Secretary at 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Michael T. Sheehan, before the original proxy is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting; (ii) executing and delivering a proxy bearing a later date, which must be received by the Company’s Secretary at 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Michael T. Sheehan, before the original proxy is voted at the 2013 Annual Meeting; or (iii) attending the 2013 Annual Meeting and voting in person. To revoke a proxy previously submitted electronically through the Internet or by telephone, you may simply vote again at a later date, using either of those electronic procedures, in which case the later submitted vote will be recorded and the earlier vote revoked.

Record Date; Voting Rights

Only holders of record of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Class B Common Stock” and, together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), and Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock” and, together with the Common Stock, the “Voting Capital Stock”), at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 12, 2013 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. On the Record Date, there were issued and outstanding: (i) 49,231,798 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, each of which is entitled to one vote, (ii) 3,125,000 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock, each of which is entitled to 10 votes, and (iii) 9,336,905 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock, each of which is entitled to one vote. Mr. Ronald O. Perelman, Chairman of the Board of Directors, directly and indirectly through MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc., of which Mr. Perelman is the sole stockholder (together with certain of its affiliates (other than the Company or its subsidiaries), “MacAndrews & Forbes”), beneficially owned approximately 77% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Voting Capital Stock as of the Record Date that are entitled to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

The presence, in person or by duly submitted proxy, of the holders of a majority in total number of votes of the issued and outstanding shares of Voting Capital Stock entitled to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum in order to transact business at such meeting. Abstentions and, as there is at least one “routine” matter (under applicable NYSE rules) for consideration at the 2013 Annual Meeting, “broker non-votes,” if any, will be included in the calculation of the number of shares present at the 2013 Annual Meeting for the purposes of determining a quorum. “Broker non-votes” are shares held by a broker, trustee or nominee that are not voted because the broker, trustee or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular proposal and does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokers will not be allowed to vote shares as to which they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner with respect to Proposal No. 1 (the election of directors). Accordingly, broker non-votes will not be counted as a vote for or against this proposal. For shares as to which they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner, brokers will be able to vote on Proposal No. 2 (ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of its independent registered public accounting firm for 2013), as this is considered a “routine” matter under applicable NYSE rules for which brokers have discretionary voting power.

MacAndrews & Forbes has informed the Company that it will duly submit proxies (1) FOR the election to the Board of Directors of each of the 12 nominees identified in this Proxy Statement; and (2) FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. Accordingly, there will be a quorum and the affirmative vote of MacAndrews & Forbes is sufficient, without the concurring vote of any of the Company’s other stockholders, to approve and adopt Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 to be considered at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

If shares of Class A Common Stock are held as of the Record Date for the account of participants under the Revlon Employees’ Savings, Investment and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), the trustee for the 401(k) Plan will vote those shares pursuant to the instructions given by the 401(k) Plan participants on their respective voting instruction forms. If the trustee does not otherwise receive voting instructions for shares held on account of a 401(k) Plan participant, the trustee, in accordance with the 401(k) Plan trust agreement, will vote any such unvoted shares in the same proportion as it votes those shares allocated to 401(k) Plan participants’ accounts for which voting instructions were received by the trustee. 401(k) Plan participants must cast their votes in accordance with the instructions provided in the proxy materials so that they are received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2013 to allow the trustee time to receive such voting instructions and vote on behalf of participants in the 401(k) Plan. Voting instructions received from 401(k) Plan participants after this deadline, under any method, will not be considered timely and will be voted by the trustee at the 2013 Annual Meeting in the manner described in this paragraph above.

Only holders of record of shares of the Company’s Voting Capital Stock on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. Stockholders will be entitled to vote the number of voting shares held by them on the Record Date.

Distribution of Proxy Materials; Costs of Distribution and Solicitation

The accompanying form of proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company will bear all costs in connection with preparing, assembling and furnishing this Proxy Statement and related materials, including reimbursing banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, agents and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders. The Company has hired Broadridge to assist in the distribution and on-line hosting of proxy materials (including the provision of electronic voting methods) for the 2013 Annual Meeting. The estimated fee is approximately $11,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, such as postage.

Householding of Stockholder Materials

Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” stockholder materials, such as proxy statements, information statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our Internet Notice or proxy materials, as the case may be, may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of our Internet Notice or the 2013 proxy materials, as the case may be, to you if you write us at the following address: Revlon, Inc., Investor Relations Department, 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017; or our proxy distributor at the following address: Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NJ 11717. If you want to receive separate copies of the stockholder materials in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address. In the interest of reducing costs and promoting environmental responsibility, we encourage our stockholders to review electronic versions of our proxy materials, via the Internet.

PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s Board of Directors, pursuant to the Company’s By-laws, has fixed the number of directors at 12, effective as of the date of the 2013 Annual Meeting. The 12 directors nominated for election by the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will be elected at the 2013 Annual Meeting to serve until the Company’s next annual stockholders’ meeting and until their successors are duly elected and shall have been qualified. All of the nominees currently are members of the Board of Directors (other than Ms. Cantor who is a new director nominee for the Company). All director nominees, if elected, are expected to serve until the next annual stockholders’ meeting. The Company has been advised that, for personal reasons and not as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to its operations, policies or practices, each of Messrs. Paul Bohan and Richard Santagati will not stand for re-election at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors has been informed that all of the nominees are willing to serve as directors, but if any of them should decline or be unable to serve, the Board of Directors may by resolution provide for a lesser number of directors or designate substitute nominees, in which event the individuals appointed as proxies will vote as directed as to the election of any such substitute nominee. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve.

Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation (Proposal No. 1)

The election to the Board of Directors of each of the 12 nominees identified in this Proxy Statement requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Voting Capital Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the 2013 Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. With respect to Proposal No. 1, all proxies properly submitted to the Company, unless such proxies are revoked, will be voted in accordance with the instructions given by the person submitting such proxy or, in the absence of such instructions, will be voted FOR the election to the Board of Directors of each of the 12 nominees identified in this Proxy Statement. Brokers do not have the ability to vote on “non-routine” matters, including the election of directors, as to shares

for which they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. In light of the application of plurality voting to the election of Directors, when tabulating the vote and determining whether the Director has received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as a vote for or against a Director. MacAndrews & Forbes has informed the Company that it will vote FOR the election to the Board of Directors of each of the 12 nominees identified in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the affirmative vote of MacAndrews & Forbes is sufficient, without the concurring vote of the Company’s other stockholders, to effect the election of each of the director nominees by the necessary plurality vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election to the Board of Directors of each of the 12 nominees identified below.

Nominees for Election as Directors

The name, age (as of December 31, 2012), principal occupation for the last five years, public company board service for the last five years, selected biographical information and period of service as a Director of the Company of each of the nominees for election as a director are set forth below.

Mr. Perelman (69) has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, the Company’s wholly-owned operating subsidiary (“Products Corporation”), since June 1998 and a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since their respective formations in 1992. Mr. Perelman has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MacAndrews & Forbes, a diversified holding company, and certain of its affiliates since 1980. Mr. Perelman has served on the Boards of Directors of the following companies which were required to file reports under the Exchange Act or were registered investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) (in either case, referred to herein as “public reporting companies”) within the last five years: the Company (1992 — present); Products Corporation (1992 — present); Scientific Games Corporation (“Scientific Games”) (2003 — present); Allied Security Holdings LLC (“Allied Security”) (2004 — 2008); and M & F Worldwide Corp. (1995 — present), a holding company that owns and operates various businesses (“M & F Worldwide”), for which Mr. Perelman has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since 2007 and as a director since 1995 (note, M & F Worldwide ceased being a public reporting company under the Exchange Act in December 2011).

Mr. Bernikow (72) has been a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since September 2003. Mr. Bernikow has served on the Board of Directors of Premier American Bank, N.A. since January 2010 as well as on the Board of Directors of such bank’s parent holding company, Bond Street Holdings, Inc., since October 2010. From 1998 until his retirement in May 2003, Mr. Bernikow served as the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”). Prior to that, Mr. Bernikow held various senior executive positions at D&T and various of its predecessor companies, which he joined in 1977. Previously, Mr. Bernikow was the National Administrative Partner in Charge for the accounting firm, J.K. Lasser & Company, which he joined in 1966. Mr. Bernikow serves as Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee and Chairman of the Company’s Compensation Committee. Mr. Bernikow has served on the Boards of Directors or Trustees of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: the Company (2003 — present); Products Corporation (2003 — present); Casual Male Retail Group, Inc. (“Casual Male”) (2003 — present), for which he also currently serves as a member of its audit committee; Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (“Mack-Cali”) (2004 — present), for which he also currently serves as chairman of its audit committee; and certain funds (the “UBS Funds”) for which UBS Global Asset Management (US) Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of UBS AG, or one of its affiliates, serves as investment advisor, sub-advisor or manager (2005 — present), and for which he serves as Chairman of its audit committee.

Ms. Cantor (55), who is a new director nominee for the Company, is a Partner of Alternative Investment Management, LLC, an independent privately-held investment management firm (“Alternative Investment Management”), a position she has held since January 2010. In addition, Ms. Cantor is the co-founder and Managing Director of Hudson James Group LLC, a strategic advisory firm providing consulting services in the public and private sectors. Ms. Cantor also serves as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Virginia Retirement System,

for which she is a member of its Audit and Compliance Committee. Ms. Cantor served as a Managing Director of the New York Private Bank & Trust (the wealth management division of Emigrant Bank) from January 2008 through December 2009. From 1996 to January 2008, she served as the Founder and Executive Director of the Virginia College Savings Plan, an independent agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Ms. Cantor served from 1990 to 1997 as Vice President of Richmond Resources, Ltd. and from 1985 to 1990 as Vice President of Goldman, Sachs & Co. She previously was an associate at Kaye Scholer LLP from 1983 to 1985. Ms. Cantor has served on the boards of directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five (5) years: Media General, Inc. (“Media General”) (2005 — present), for which she also currently serves as chair of its audit committee; Domino’s Pizza, Inc. (“Domino’s Pizza”) (2005 — present), for which she also currently serves as chair of its audit committee; The Edelman Financial Group Inc. (2011 — 2012); and Universal Corporation (2012 — present), for which she also currently serves as a member of its audit committee.

Mr. Dinh (44) has been a Director of the Company since June 2012. Mr. Dinh is the founding partner of Bancroft PLLC, a law and strategic consulting firm which he founded in 2003, and a tenured law professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, where he has taught since 1996. In addition, Mr. Dinh serves as the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Strayer Education, Inc., an education services holding company that owns Strayer University, which holding company he joined in 2010. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Dinh served as Assistant Attorney General for Legal Policy at the U.S. Department of Justice. Mr. Dinh serves as a member of the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Dinh has served on the Boards of Directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: News Corporation (2004 — present); M & F Worldwide (2007 — 2011 (note, M & F Worldwide ceased being a public reporting company under the Exchange Act in December 2011)); The Orchard, Inc. (2007 — 2010); and the Company (2012 — present).

Mr. Ennis (42) has served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2009. Mr. Ennis has served as a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since March 2009. Mr. Ennis served as President, Revlon International from May 2008 to March 2009. Mr. Ennis served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from November 2006 to May 2009, Treasurer from June 2008 to May 2009, and Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from September 2006 to March 2007. From March 2005 to September 2006, Mr. Ennis served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Internal Audit. From 1997 through 2005, Mr. Ennis held several senior financial positions with Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, a NYSE-listed company, where his duties included regional responsibility for Internal Audit in Europe and global responsibility for financial planning and analysis. Mr. Ennis began his career in 1991 with Arthur Andersen in Ireland. Mr. Ennis is a Chartered Accountant and member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland. Mr. Ennis has served as a director of the Ireland — U.S. Council, a non-profit organization that seeks to build business links between America and Ireland, since November 2009. Mr. Ennis has a Bachelor of Commerce Degree from University College, Dublin, Ireland, and a Master of Business Administration Degree from New York University, New York, NY. Mr. Ennis has served on the Boards of Directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: the Company (2009 — present) and Products Corporation (2009 — present).

Professor Feldberg (70) has been a Director of the Company since February 1997. Professor Feldberg has been a Senior Advisor with Morgan Stanley since March 2005 and has been the Dean Emeritus and the Professor of Leadership and Ethics at Columbia Business School, New York City, since July 2004. Professor Feldberg also serves as an Advisory Director of Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a private equity investment firm. He was the Dean of Columbia Business School from July 1989 through June 2004. Since 2007, Professor Feldberg has served as the President of NYC Global Partners, an office in the New York City Mayor’s office that manages the relationships between New York City and other cities around the world. Professor Feldberg serves as Chairman of the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Company’s Audit Committee. Professor Feldberg has served on the Boards of Directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: Macy’s, Inc. (“Macy’s”) (1992 — present); the Company (1997 — present); PRIMEDIA Inc. (“PRIMEDIA”) (1997 — 2011); UBS Funds (2001 — present); and Sappi Limited (“Sappi”) (2002 — 2012).

Mr. Kennedy (66) has been the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors since May 2009. Mr. Kennedy has served as a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since September 2006. Mr. Kennedy has also served as Senior Executive Vice President of MacAndrews & Forbes since May 2009. Mr. Kennedy served as Chief Administrative Officer of Scientific Games from April 2011 to March 2012. Mr. Kennedy has served as Vice Chairman of Scientific Games since October 2009. Mr. Kennedy served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer from September 2006 to May 2009, and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from March 2006 to September 2006, and as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Products Corporation’s President, International from June 2002 until March 2006. From 1998 until 2001, Mr. Kennedy was Managing Director (CEO) and a member of the Board of Directors of Coca-Cola Amatil Limited, a publicly-traded company headquartered in Sydney, Australia and listed on the Sydney Stock Exchange (“Coca-Cola Amatil”). From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Kennedy served as General Manager of the Coca-Cola USA Fountain Division, a unit of The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”), which he joined in 1980. Mr. Kennedy has served on the Boards of Directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: the Company (2006 — present); Products Corporation (2006 — present); and Scientific Games (2009 — present).

Ms. Kurzman (43) has been a Director of the Company since February 2013. Ms. Kurzman serves as President of Nexus Management Group, Inc. (“Nexus Management”), a talent representation and consulting group which she founded in 2004. Prior to founding Nexus Management, Ms. Kurzman joined Epic/Sony Music in 1997 as Vice President of Worldwide Marketing and held positions of increasing responsibility there until 2004. From 1992 to 1997, Ms. Kurzman held positions of increasing responsibility at Arista Records, including serving as Director of Artist Development.

Ms. Lee (58) has been a Director of the Company since January 2006. Ms. Lee is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BET Networks (“BET”), a division of Viacom Inc., a global media and entertainment company, that owns and operates Black Entertainment Television. Ms. Lee has held executive management positions of increasing responsibility with BET since joining that company in 1986. Prior to joining BET, Ms. Lee was an attorney with the Washington, D.C.-based law firm of Steptoe & Johnson. Ms. Lee serves as a member of the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Lee has served on the Boards of Directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) (1999 — 2011); WGL Holdings, Inc. (“WGL”) (2000 — present), for which she also serves as a member of the audit committee; Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”) (2004 — present); and the Company (2006 — present).

Ms. Mellon (45) has been a Director of the Company since August 2008. Ms. Mellon is the President of TMellon Enterprises LLC. In 1996, Ms. Mellon founded, and thereafter until November 2011 served in a senior executive capacity with, J. Choo Limited (“Jimmy Choo”), a leading manufacturer and international retailer of glamorous, ready-to-wear women’s shoes and accessories based in London, England, including serving most recently as Chief Creative Officer. Prior to that, Ms. Mellon served as accessories editor for British Vogue magazine, since 1990, and previously held positions at Mirabella magazine and Phyllis Walters Public Relations. Ms. Mellon also serves on the Board of Directors and on the Creative Advisory Board of The H Company Holdings, LLC, a privately held holding company which owns and manages the Halston fashion design company. Ms. Mellon has served on the Board of Directors of the following public reporting company within the last five years: the Company (2008 — present).

Mr. Schwartz (63) has been a Director of the Company since November 2007 and a Director of Products Corporation since March 2004. Mr. Schwartz has served as Executive Vice Chairman of MacAndrews & Forbes since October 2007. Mr. Schwartz served as Senior Vice President of MacAndrews & Forbes from 1989 to 1993 and as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of MacAndrews & Forbes and various of its affiliates from 1993 to 2007. Mr. Schwartz serves as the Chairperson of the Board of Trustees of Kenyon College. Mr. Schwartz is also a member of the Board of Visitors of the Georgetown University Law Center. Mr. Schwartz serves as a member of the Company’s Compensation Committee. Mr. Schwartz has served on the Boards of Directors of the

following public reporting companies within the last five years: Scientific Games (2003 — present); Products Corporation (2004 — present); Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (2005 — present); Allied Security (2007 — 2008); the Company (2007 — present); and M & F Worldwide (2008 — present; note, M & F Worldwide ceased being a public reporting company under the Exchange Act in December 2011).

Ms. Seifert (63) has been a Director of the Company since January 2006. Ms. Seifert has been President of Katapult, LLC, a business consulting company, since July 2004. Ms. Seifert served as Corporate Executive Vice President — Personal Care of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, a global health and hygiene company (“Kimberly-Clark”), from 1999 until her retirement in June 2004. Ms. Seifert joined Kimberly-Clark in 1978 and, prior to her retirement, served in several senior executive positions in connection with Kimberly-Clark’s domestic and international consumer products businesses. Prior to joining Kimberly-Clark, Ms. Seifert held management positions at The Procter & Gamble Company, Beatrice Foods, Inc. and Fort Howard Paper Company. Ms. Seifert serves as a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and its Compensation Committee. Ms. Seifert has served on the Boards of Directors of the following public reporting companies within the last five years: Eli Lilly & Company (1995 — present), for which she also currently serves as a member of its audit committee (“Eli Lilly”); Paperweight Development Corp. (2004 — present) (“Paperweight Development”); Appleton Papers Inc. (2004 — present) (“Appleton”); the Company (2006 — present); Lexmark International, Inc. (2006 — present) (“Lexmark”); and Supervalu Inc. (2006 — 2013) (“Supervalu”).

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors and its Committees

Standing Committees

The Board of Directors currently has the following standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”). Each of these committees and their functions are described in further detail below.

Controlled Company Exemption

The Company is a “controlled company” (i.e., one in which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group or another company) within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). Accordingly, the Company is not required under the NYSE rules to have a majority of independent directors, a nominating and corporate governance committee or a compensation committee (each of which, under the NYSE’s rules, would otherwise be required to be comprised entirely of independent directors).

While the Company is not required under NYSE rules to satisfy the above-listed NYSE corporate governance requirements due to its “controlled company” status, the Board has determined that more than a majority of its current directors (including Messrs. Bernikow, Bohan, Dinh, Feldberg and Santagati and Mses. Kurzman, Lee, Mellon and Seifert), as well as Ms. Cantor, a new director nominee, qualify as independent directors within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and under the Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence, which the Board adopted in accordance with Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence are available at www.revloninc.com under the heading Investor Relations (Corporate Governance).

Notwithstanding the fact that the Company qualifies for the “controlled company” exemption, the Company maintains the Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Company maintains the Governance Committee (comprised of Messrs. Feldberg (Chairman), Bohan, Dinh and Santagati and Ms. Lee), and the Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Governance Committee qualify as independent directors within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and under the Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence. The Company also maintains the Compensation Committee (comprised of Messrs. Bernikow (Chairman), Santagati and Schwartz and Ms. Seifert), and the Board has determined that three of the four directors on the Compensation Committee (Mr. Bernikow, Mr. Santagati and Ms. Seifert) qualify as independent directors within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and under the Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence and also qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and as “outside directors” under Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

In October 2009, the Company consummated a voluntary exchange offer transaction, pursuant to which Revlon, Inc. issued to stockholders (other than MacAndrews & Forbes and certain of its affiliates) 9,336,905 shares of Preferred Stock (the “2009 Exchange Offer”). In connection with the 2009 Exchange Offer, the Company entered into a Contribution and Stockholder Agreement, dated August 9, 2009, as amended, with MacAndrews & Forbes, pursuant to which the parties agreed, among other things, that, until October 8, 2013, the Company will continue to maintain a majority of independent directors on its Board of Directors, each of whom meets the “independence” criteria as set forth in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Contribution and Stockholder Agreement”).

Number of Board and Committee Meetings

During 2012, the Board of Directors held ten meetings and acted six times by unanimous written consent; the Audit Committee held six meetings; the Compensation Committee held four meetings and acted once by unanimous written consent; and the Governance Committee held five meetings and acted once by unanimous written consent.

Director Attendance at Annual Stockholders’ Meeting

While the Board has not adopted a formal policy regarding directors’ attendance at the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting, directors are invited to attend such meeting. One member of the Company’s Board of Directors attended the Company’s 2012 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting.

Board Leadership Structure

The Company believes that its board leadership structure is appropriate given the specific circumstances of the Company, as its Board continues to function effectively and efficiently. Notwithstanding the fact that the Company is a “controlled” company, more than a majority of the Company’s Directors are independent under applicable SEC and NYSE rules. The Board has established audit, governance and compensation committees, each operating under written charters, to assist the Board in its oversight functions, and in each case those committees are comprised of at least a majority of independent Directors (with each of the Board’s Audit Committee and Governance Committee being comprised entirely of independent directors and three of the four members of the Compensation Committee being independent directors). The qualifications and experience of nominees for board service and committee membership are reviewed annually by the Governance Committee. Nominees for board membership are then recommended by such committee for appointment by the Board. Respective committee chairmen lead each committee. The Company has not established a “lead director” role. At Board and committee meetings, the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of each such committee, as applicable, presides for the purpose of conducting an orderly and efficient meeting. Independent directors or any other director may lead or initiate discussion, in the interest of promoting thorough consideration of any issue before the Board or any of its committees. The Company has historically maintained separate positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Perelman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MacAndrews & Forbes, has held the position of Chairman of the Company’s Board since June 1998 and Mr. Ennis has held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 2009. The Chairman provides overall leadership to the Board in its oversight function, while the Chief Executive Officer provides leadership in respect to the day-to-day management and operation of the Company’s business. The Board and each of its committees conduct annual self-assessments to review and monitor their respective continued effectiveness. As part of its 2012 self-assessment exercise, the Board determined, among other things, that its size, composition and structure were appropriate. The Company believes that its separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions and its overall board leadership structure are appropriate.

Set forth below is a summary of the respective nominees’ experience, qualifications (including management experience, education and professional training) and background (including public company board experience and familiarity with the Company, including past service on the Company’s Board of Directors), which, among other factors, including as summarized in each individual’s biographical information presented above in this Proxy Statement, and as set forth below, support their respective qualifications to continue to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors, or in the case of Ms. Cantor, to be elected to the Board of Directors. Without limiting the foregoing —

•

Mr. Bernikow: Mr. Bernikow’s accounting experience and financial expertise (including having served for 26 years at D&T and its predecessors), his public-company board and audit committee experience (including at UBS Funds, Casual Male and Mack-Cali) and his familiarity with the Company, as well as his prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify him to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Ms. Cantor: Ms. Cantor’s senior executive experience in the areas of legal, investment and financial management (including currently serving as Partner of Alternative Investment Management and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Virginia Retirement System), her accounting experience and financial expertise, and her significant public company directorship and committee experience (including at Media General, Domino’s Pizza and Universal Corporation) qualify her to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Mr. Dinh: Mr. Dinh’s academic experience (including serving as Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center), his government experience (including having served as Assistant Attorney

General for Legal Policy for the U.S. Department of Justice), his business experience (including serving as a partner of Bancroft PLLC, which he founded, and as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Strayer Education, Inc.), as well as his public company board experience (including at News Corporation and formerly at each of M & F Worldwide, which ceased to be a public reporting company in December 2011, and The Orchard, Inc.), as well as his prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify him to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Mr. Ennis: Mr. Ennis’ experience as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as his prior experience as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, President, Revlon International, and Chief Accounting Officer, and his familiarity with the Company, as well as his prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify him to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Professor Feldberg: Professor Feldberg’s academic experience (including having served for 15 years as Dean of the Columbia Business School), his civic experience (including serving as President of NYC Global Partners), his business experience (including serving as Senior Advisor at Morgan Stanley and as Advisory Director of Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe), as well as his public company board experience (including at Macy’s and UBS Funds and formerly at each of PRIMEDIA and Sappi) and his familiarity with the Company, as well as his prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify him to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Mr. Kennedy: Mr. Kennedy’s senior executive, international business and financial experience (including that gained in positions of increasing responsibility at the Company since 2002 (including serving as the Company’s Vice Chairman and previously having served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President, Revlon International) and in several senior executive management positions at Coca-Cola, and also including his former service as Chief Administrative Officer at Scientific Games), his public company board experience (including formerly at Coca-Cola Amatil), and his familiarity with the Company, as well as his prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify him to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Ms. Kurzman: Ms. Kurzman’s senior executive experience in the areas of talent representation and talent-related brand-to-brand business development strategies (including serving as President of Nexus Management, a talent representation and consulting group which she founded in 2004) and marketing (including serving in senior marketing positions at Epic/Sony Music and Arista Records, respectively), as well as her prior experience as a Director of the Company, qualify her to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Ms. Lee: Ms. Lee’s senior executive experience (including serving in various senior executive roles at BET, including currently serving as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), her legal experience (including having practiced as an attorney at the law firm of Steptoe & Johnson and then as General Counsel of BET), her public company board experience (including at Marriott and WGL and formerly at Kodak,) and her familiarity with the Company, as well as her prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify her to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Ms. Mellon: Ms. Mellon’s experience in the fashion industry and marketing of women’s retail products (including serving as President of TMellon Enterprises LLC and having served as founder and Chief Creative Officer of Jimmy Choo) and her familiarity with the Company, as well as her prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify her to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Mr. Perelman: Mr. Perelman’s extensive business and financial experience (including managing diverse businesses within the MacAndrews & Forbes group of companies), his public company board experience (including at Scientific Games and at M & F Worldwide, which ceased to be a public reporting company in December 2011) and his knowledge of the Company and his long-standing service as a Director of the Company, together with his being the Company’s controlling stockholder, qualify him to continue to serve on the Company’s Board, including continuing to serve as the Chairman of the Board.

•

Mr. Schwartz: Mr. Schwartz’s senior executive experience (including serving as Executive Vice Chairman of MacAndrews & Forbes), his legal experience (including having served as General Counsel

at M & F Worldwide), his public company board experience (including at Scientific Games, Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and M & F Worldwide, which ceased to be a public reporting company in December 2011) and his familiarity with the Company, as well as his prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify him to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

•

Ms. Seifert: Ms. Seifert’s senior executive experience (including having served as Corporate Executive Vice President — Personal Care at Kimberly-Clark, a major consumer products company), her public company board experience (including at Eli Lilly, Appleton, Paperweight Development and Lexmark and formerly at Supervalu) and her familiarity with the Company, as well as her prior service as a Director of the Company, qualify her to continue to serve on the Company’s Board.

Audit Committee

Composition of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Bernikow (Chairman), Bohan and Feldberg and Ms. Seifert, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined satisfies the NYSE’s and the SEC’s audit committee independence and financial experience requirements. Each of these directors served as a member of the Audit Committee during all of 2012 and each of these directors remained a member of the Audit Committee as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

The Company has determined that Mr. Bernikow qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” under applicable SEC rules. In accordance with applicable NYSE listing standards, the Company’s Board of Directors has considered Mr. Bernikow’s simultaneous service on the audit committees of more than three public companies, namely the audit committees of the Company, Casual Male, Mack-Cali and the UBS Funds, and has determined that such service does not impair his ability to effectively serve on the Company’s Audit Committee as, among other things, Mr. Bernikow is retired and, accordingly, has a flexible schedule and time to commit to service as an Audit Committee and Board member, including on a full-time basis, if necessary; he has significant professional accounting experience and expertise, which renders him highly qualified to effectively and efficiently serve on multiple audit committees; the audit committees of the UBS Funds effectively function as a single, consolidated audit committee; and Mr. Bernikow has served as a member of the Company’s Audit Committee since 2003 and his service on the other audit committees noted has not impaired his ability to effectively serve on the Company’s Audit Committee during this period.

Audit Committee Charter

The Audit Committee operates under a comprehensive written charter, a printable and current copy of which is available at www.revloninc.com under the heading, Investor Relations (Corporate Governance).

Audit Committee Responsibilities

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to, among other things, the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and disclosures; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors, as well as their qualifications, independence and performance; and the performance of the Company’s internal audit functions. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the annual Audit Committee Report, which is required under SEC rules to be included in this Proxy Statement (see “Audit Committee Report,” below).

Audit Committee Complaint Procedures

The Audit Committee has established procedures for (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; and (b) the

confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. These complaint procedures are described in the Audit Committee’s charter, a printable and current copy of which is available at www.revloninc.com under the heading, Investor Relations (Corporate Governance).

Audit Committee Report

Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed such audited consolidated financial statements with management and KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T, including information concerning the scope and results of the audit and information relating to KPMG LLP’s judgments about the quality, and not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles. These communications and discussions are intended to assist the Audit Committee in overseeing the Company’s financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that firm’s independence.

The Audit Committee also reviewed, among other things, the amount of fees paid to the independent registered public accounting firm for audit and permissible non-audit services (see “Audit Fees” in this Proxy Statement, below). The Audit Committee has satisfied itself that KPMG LLP’s provision of audit and non-audit services to the Company is compatible with KPMG LLP’s independence.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review of and discussions regarding the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting with management, the Company’s internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm and the other reviews and discussions with the independent registered public accounting firm referred to in the preceding paragraph, subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s roles and responsibilities described above and in the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted,

Audit Committee

Alan S. Bernikow, Chairman

Paul J. Bohan

Meyer Feldberg

Kathi P. Seifert

Compensation Committee

Composition of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Bernikow (Chairman), Santagati and Schwartz and Ms. Seifert. Each of these directors served as a member of the Compensation Committee during all of 2012 and each of these directors remained a member of the Compensation Committee as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee Charter

The Compensation Committee operates under a comprehensive written charter, a printable and current copy of which is available at www.revloninc.com under the heading, Investor Relations (Corporate Governance).

Compensation Committee’s Responsibilities

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), evaluates the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and determines, either as a committee or together with the Board of Directors, the CEO’s compensation level based on such evaluation. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves compensation and incentive arrangements for the Company’s executive officers and such other employees of the Company as the Compensation Committee may determine to be necessary or desirable from time to time. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves awards pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (the “Stock Plan”) and the Revlon Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Compensation Plan”) and administers such plans. The Company did not implement any equity award program for 2012.

The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing and discussing with the Company’s appropriate officers the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by the SEC’s rules and, based on such review and discussion, (i) determining whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K or in the annual proxy statement (and incorporated by reference into the annual report on Form 10-K) and (ii) producing the annual Compensation Committee Report and approving its inclusion in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K or in the annual proxy statement. The Compensation Committee also considers any potential conflicts of interest with its outside compensation advisor, and determined that there are none.

Compensation Committee’s Delegation of Authority

Pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee may delegate to an administrator (who must be an employee or officer of the Company) the power and authority to administer the Incentive Compensation Plan for the Company’s employees, other than its Chief Executive Officer and certain other officers who constitute “covered employees” as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.162-27(c)(2) (“Section 162(m) Officers”). Section 157(c) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) provides that the Company’s Board of Directors (or the Compensation Committee acting on behalf of the Board) may delegate authority to any officer of the Company to designate grantees of equity awards under the Stock Plan other than himself or herself and to determine the number of such equity awards to be issued. The Compensation Committee did not delegate any such authority for 2012.

Role of Officers and Consultants in the Compensation Committee’s Deliberations

For a discussion of the role of the Company’s executive officers and compensation consultants in recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation, and the consideration of any possible conflicts of interest with the Compensation Committee’s outside compensation advisor, see “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Role of the Compensation Committee.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee does not have any interlocks or insider participation requiring disclosure under the SEC’s executive compensation rules.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth below in this Proxy Statement with the Company’s appropriate officers. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement, as well as in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, including by incorporation by reference to this 2013 Proxy Statement.

Respectfully submitted,

Compensation Committee

Alan S. Bernikow, Chairman

Richard J. Santagati

Barry F. Schwartz

Kathi P. Seifert

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Composition of the Governance Committee

The Governance Committee is comprised of Messrs. Feldberg (Chairman), Bohan, Dinh and Santagati and Ms. Lee. Each of these Directors served as a member of the Governance Committee during all of 2012 (other than Mr. Dinh, who served on such committee from and after his appointment in June 2012, upon his election to the Board at the 2012 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting) and each of these Directors remained a member of the Governance Committee as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Governance Committee Charter

The Governance Committee operates under a comprehensive written charter, a printable and current copy of which is available at www.revloninc.com under the heading, Investor Relations (Corporate Governance).

Governance Committee Responsibilities

Pursuant to its charter, the functions of the Governance Committee include, among other things: identifying individuals qualified to become Board members; selecting or recommending to the Board proposed nominees for Board membership; recommending directors to the Board to serve on the Board’s standing committees; overseeing the evaluation of the Board’s performance; evaluating the CEO’s and senior management’s performance; overseeing the Revlon, Inc. Related Party Transaction Policy; overseeing the Company’s processes for succession planning for the CEO and other senior management positions; and periodically reviewing the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence and recommending changes, if any, to the Board.

Director Nominating Processes; Diversity

The Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board when any vacancy occurs by reason of disqualification, resignation, retirement, death or an increase in the size of the Board, and selects or recommends that the Board select director nominees for each annual meeting of stockholders and director nominees to fill vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of stockholders.

In evaluating director nominees, the Governance Committee is guided by, among other things, the principles for Board membership expressed in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available at www.revloninc.com under the heading, Investor Relations (Corporate Governance). The Governance Committee, in identifying and considering candidates for nomination to the Board, considers, in addition to the requirements set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Governance Committee’s charter, the quality of the candidate’s experience, the Company’s needs and the range of talent and experience represented on the Board. In its assessment of each potential candidate, the Governance Committee will consider the nominee’s reputation, judgment, accomplishments in present and prior positions, independence, knowledge and experience that may be relevant to the Company, and such other factors as the Governance Committee determines to be pertinent in light of the Board’s needs over time, including, without limitation, education, diversity, race, gender and other individual qualities and attributes that are expected to contribute to the Board having an appropriate mix of viewpoints. The Governance Committee identifies potential nominees from various sources, such as officers, directors and stockholders, and from time to time retains the services of third party consultants to assist it in identifying and evaluating director nominees.

Stockholder Process for Submitting Director Nominees

The Governance Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. The process the Governance Committee follows to evaluate candidates submitted by stockholders does not differ from the process it follows for evaluating other director nominees. The Governance Committee may also take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholder, the length of time that such shares have been held and the number of candidates submitted by each stockholder or group of stockholders over the course of time. Stockholders desiring to submit director candidates must submit their recommendation in writing (certified mail — return receipt requested) to the Company’s Secretary, at Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, attention: Michael T. Sheehan.

The Governance Committee will accept recommendations for director candidates throughout the year; however, in order for a recommended director candidate to be considered by the Governance Committee for nomination to stand for election at an upcoming annual meeting of stockholders, the recommendation must be received by the Company, as set forth above, not less than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the date of the Company’s most recent proxy statement, which, for recommendations for the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting, was December 25, 2012. No such recommendations were received for the 2013 Annual Meeting. To have a candidate considered by the Governance Committee, a stockholder must, subject to further requests for information from the Governance Committee, initially provide the following information:

•

the stockholder’s name and address, evidence of such stockholder’s ownership of the Company’s Voting Capital Stock, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of ownership, and a statement as to the number of director candidates such stockholder has submitted to the Governance Committee during the period that such stockholder has owned shares of the Company’s Voting Capital Stock, including the names of any candidates previously submitted by such stockholder;

•

the name of the candidate;

•

the candidate’s resume or a listing of his or her qualifications to be a director of the Company;

•

any other information regarding the candidate that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement filed with the SEC if the candidate were nominated for election to the Board; and

•

the candidate’s consent to be named as a director, if selected by the Governance Committee and nominated by the Board.

Stockholder-Director Communications

The Board of Directors has established a process to receive communications from stockholders and other interested parties. Any stockholder or other interested party desiring to communicate with the Board or individual

directors (including, without limitation, the non-management directors) regarding the Company may contact either the Board or such director by sending such communication to the attention of the Board or such director, in each case in care of the Company’s Secretary, who is responsible to ensure that all such communications are promptly provided to the Board or such director. Any such communication may be sent by: (i) emailing it to Michael T. Sheehan, Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary, at michael.sheehan@revlon.com; or (ii) mailing it to Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, attention: Michael T. Sheehan. Communications that consist of stockholder proposals must instead follow the procedures set forth under “General Rules Applicable to Stockholder Proposals” in this Proxy Statement, below, and, in the case of recommendations of director candidates, “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee — Stockholder Process for Submitting Director Nominees,” in this Proxy Statement, above.

Non-Management Executive Sessions

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Company’s Board of Directors will regularly meet in executive session without any member of the Company’s management being present and that the Company’s independent directors will also meet in at least one non-management executive session per year attended only by independent directors. The non-management directors’ and independent directors’ meeting may be a single combined meeting, if the non-management directors are comprised entirely of independent directors. A non-management director will preside over each non-management executive session of the Board, and an independent director will preside over each independent executive session of the Board, although the same director is not required to preside at all such non-management or independent executive sessions. The presiding director at such non-management and independent executive sessions of the Board is determined in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Company’s By-laws, such that the Chairman of the Board of Directors or, in his absence (as is the case with independent executive sessions), a director chosen by a majority of the directors present will preside at such meetings. The Board of Directors met in at least one executive session, attended by only independent directors (all of whom constituted non-management directors), during 2012.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth each of the executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2012, and their respective current positions with the Company as of the date hereof (each of whom constitutes a “Named Executive Officer” under this Proxy Statement):


Name		Position
Alan T. Ennis		President and Chief Executive Officer
Steven Berns		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Chris Elshaw		Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
David L. Kennedy		Vice Chairman
Robert K. Kretzman		Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

The following sets forth the age (as of December 31, 2012), positions held with the Company and selected biographical information for the Company’s executive officers whose biographical information is not otherwise included in this Proxy Statement, above, with the Company’s Directors:

Mr. Berns (48) has served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2009. Mr. Berns formerly served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Treasurer from May 2009 to February 2010. Mr. Berns previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Tradeweb, LLC from November 2007 to May 2009. From November 2005 until July 2007, Mr. Berns served as President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of MDC Partners Inc. From September 2004 to November 2005, Mr. Berns served as Vice Chairman and Executive Vice President of MDC Partners. Prior to that, Mr. Berns was the Senior Vice President and Treasurer of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. from August 1999 until September 2004. Before that, Mr. Berns held a variety of positions in finance with the Company from April 1992 until August 1999, becoming Senior Vice President and Treasurer in 1996, after having served as the Company’s Vice President, Corporate Finance, Investor Relations. Prior to joining the Company in 1992, Mr. Berns worked at Paramount Communications Inc. and at a predecessor public accounting firm of D&T. Mr. Berns has served as a Director of Shutterstock, Inc. since March 2012 and he currently serves as chairman of that company’s audit committee and as a member of its compensation committee. Mr. Berns served as a Director and member of the audit and compensation committees for LivePerson, Inc. from April 2002 until June 2011. Mr. Berns is a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Elshaw (52) has served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2009. Mr. Elshaw previously served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Manager, U.S. Region, from October 2007 until May 2009. From July 2002 until September 2007, Mr. Elshaw held several leadership roles within Revlon International, including Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Europe, Middle East and Canada from May 2006 to October 2007; Managing Director of Europe and the Middle East from December 2003 to May 2006; General Manager of the U.K., Ireland and European Distributor Markets from February 2003 to December 2003; and General Manager of the U.K. and Ireland from July 2002 to February 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Elshaw held several senior management sales and marketing positions at Bristol-Myers Squibb (Clairol Division) from 1996 until 2002, including serving as General Manager of the U.K. and Ireland from 2000 until 2002. From 1983 to 1995, Mr. Elshaw served in various European senior sales and marketing positions at Alberto Culver. Mr. Elshaw is a board member of the Personal Care Products Council, a cosmetic and personal care products industry association.

Mr. Kretzman (61) has served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since November 2010. Formerly, he served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s General Counsel from January 2000 to March 2011 and Chief Legal Officer from December 2003 to November 2010, and also as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Executive Vice President, Human Resources from October 2006 to November 2010. Mr. Kretzman formerly served as the Company’s and Products

Corporation’s Secretary from September 1992 to June 2009. Mr. Kretzman served as the Company’s and Products Corporation’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel from January 2000 until December 2003. Prior to becoming General Counsel, Mr. Kretzman served as Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel from March 1998 to January 2000, as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel from January 1997 to March 1998, and as Vice President, Law from September 1992 to January 1997. Mr. Kretzman joined the Company in 1988 as Senior Counsel responsible for mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Kretzman also served as the Company’s Corporate Compliance Officer from January 2000 through March 2012.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Relationship of Compensation Practices to Risk Management

The Company has reviewed and considered all of its compensation plans and practices and does not believe that its compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Risk Oversight

The Company’s senior management is responsible for identifying and managing risks to the Company’s business and the Board’s Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing that process with management. In accordance with applicable NYSE rules for listed issuers, the Audit Committee maintains an Audit Committee charter that addresses the duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee, including the requirement that such committee discuss the Company’s guidelines, policies and processes with respect to risk assessment and risk management. As part of the Company’s enterprise risk management function, management identifies internal and external risk factors, monitors identified risks and takes appropriate action to mitigate such identified risks. Specifically, the Company’s internal audit group, with input from the Company’s senior management, leads a comprehensive enterprise risk assessment annually using an established risk management framework. This process identifies and characterizes risks based on the possible impact to the Company’s business and likelihood of occurrence. The Company’s management puts in place appropriate plans to mitigate the risks identified. The risk assessment is also taken into account in the formulation of the internal audit plan for the ensuing year. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses the Company’s risk assessment and risk management guidelines, policies and processes at least annually. Further, the Board reviews the Company’s business plan and receives regular business and financial updates, including progress against the Company’s business plan, at Board meetings, enabling the Board to understand, and remain updated regarding, the business risks faced by the Company and the Company’s management of those risks.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Set forth below is a discussion and analysis of all material elements of the Company’s compensation of its Named Executive Officers, including: (i) the objectives of the Company’s compensation program; (ii) what the compensation program is designed to reward; (iii) each element of compensation; (iv) why the Company chooses to pay each element; (v) how the Company determines the amount (and, where applicable, the formula) for each element to pay; (vi) how each compensation element and the Company’s decisions regarding that element fit into the Company’s overall compensation objectives and may affect decisions regarding other elements of compensation; and (vii) whether and, if so, how the Company has considered the results of the most recent stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation in determining its compensation policies and decisions.

Overview of 2012 Compensation Events

A summary of the key actions which the Company took in respect to its 2012 compensation programs follows:

•

For 2012, the Company’s incentive compensation programs were comprised of an annual cash bonus program (the “2012 Annual Bonus Program”) and a long-term cash incentive compensation (“LTIP”)

program (the “2012 LTIP;” and, together with the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, referred to herein collectively as the “2012 Incentive Compensation Programs”), each of which was approved by the Compensation Committee and is governed by the terms of the Incentive Compensation Plan.

•

The Company’s corporate performance targets under the 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs were the Company’s achievement of two equally-weighted performance targets, namely, $290.2 million of “Adjusted EBITDA” for 2012 (the “2012 EBITDA Performance Target”)¹ and $71.7 million of “Free Cash Flow” for 2012 (the “2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target”),² in each case measured after all incentive compensation accruals (collectively, the “2012 Performance Targets”).

•

Based on the Company’s 2012 financial results, in February 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company had achieved 99.5% of its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target and 124.6% of its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, after all accruals for incentive compensation actually paid at the funding level authorized below, and after adjusting, pursuant to its authority under and in accordance with the terms of the Incentive Compensation Plan, for the impact of certain extraordinary items which were not included in the Company’s budget when such targets were established (including, without limitation, certain restructuring charges, costs incurred in connection with resolving certain litigation, increased insurance premiums, receipt of insurance proceeds relating to the June 2011 fire at the Company’s Venezuela operating facility and results of the Company’s acquisition of certain assets from Bari Cosmetics, Ltd. in July 2012). Taking into account the Company’s 2012 Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow performance, the fact that there were certain extraordinary and unbudgeted items for which adjustments were made, as noted above, and recognizing that, while the Company’s net sales increased by 4.8% (excluding the impact of foreign currency) from the prior year, the Company’s net sales performance fell slightly short of the Company’s 2012 budget for such item, the Compensation Committee determined, upon management’s recommendation, to fund the 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs at 105%.

•

In March 2013, the Company paid annual cash bonuses under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program to eligible employees, including its Named Executive Officers, based upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of the extent of the Company’s achievement of its performance targets under such program, individual performance ratings and the degree of achievement by bonus program participants of their individual performance objectives for 2012, subject to the terms of such program.

•

As has been the case since 2009, the Company does not have an equity award program. In lieu of equity awards, commencing in 2010, the Compensation Committee implemented an LTIP program, and it approved the 2012 LTIP under the Incentive Compensation Plan. In March 2013, the Company paid one-third of the LTIP award earned under its 2012 LTIP to eligible employees, including its Named Executive Officers, based upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of the extent of achievement of the performance targets under the 2012 LTIP and the 3-year payout terms of such program authorized by the

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure which the Company defines as income from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, gains/losses on foreign currency fluctuations, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt and miscellaneous expenses. In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, the Company excludes the effects of gains/losses on foreign currency fluctuations, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, results of and gains/losses on discontinued operations and miscellaneous expenses because the Company’s management believes that some of these items may not occur in certain periods, the amounts recognized can vary significantly from period to period and these items do not facilitate an understanding of the Company’s operating performance.

Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure which the Company defines as net cash provided by operating activities, less capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment, plus proceeds from the sale of certain assets. Free Cash Flow excludes proceeds on sale of discontinued operations. Free Cash Flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures, as it excludes certain expenditures such as mandatory debt service requirements, which for the Company are significant.

Compensation Committee. The remaining two-thirds of the 2012 LTIP award will be paid out in equal one-third amounts in March 2014 and 2015, provided the grantee remains employed with the Company on the respective payout dates.

•

The Company provided merit salary increases in March 2012.

•

At the Company’s 2011 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting, approximately 99% of the stockholders who voted on the “say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, which the Company has considered in determining its compensation policies and decisions and which vote the Company believes provides an endorsement of the Company’s compensation philosophy, processes and practices, which have not varied in any meaningful way since such vote.

Objectives of the Company’s Compensation Program and What it is Designed to Reward

The Company’s philosophy is to provide compensation programs that are reasonably designed to satisfy the following objectives:

•

to pay for performance (by basing salary increases upon individual performance and basing incentive compensation payouts upon the achievement of corporate and individual performance targets and objectives);

•

to align the interests of management and employees with corporate performance and shareholder interests, by rewarding performance that is directly linked to achieving the Company’s business plan and strategic goals; and

•

to retain, attract and motivate exceptional performers and key contributors with the skills and experience necessary for the Company to achieve its business plan and strategic goals, which requires that the Company’s compensation programs be competitive with the compensation practices of other companies, as discussed in further detail below.

Each Element of Compensation and Why the Company Chooses to Pay It

In order to achieve the objectives discussed above, the Company maintains a simple compensation program which consists principally of:

(i) base salary;

(ii) eligibility for performance-based, annual cash bonuses under the Incentive Compensation Plan, contingent upon the Company achieving specific performance targets and participants achieving individual performance objectives, with exact bonus payouts based upon the extent of achievement by participants of their respective individual performance objectives (as noted below, under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, depending on the assessment of individual performance, participants could receive between 25% and 150% of their target award, to enable comparatively higher-performing employees to be rewarded, as long as the overall compensation budget was not exceeded); and

(iii) eligibility for performance-based, long-term incentive compensation under the Incentive Compensation Plan, contingent upon the Company achieving specific performance targets and participants achieving “target” performance objectives (the above-described elements of compensation, namely, base salary, annual performance-based cash bonus and performance-based long-term incentive compensation are referred to, collectively, in this Proxy Statement, as “total compensation,” unless otherwise noted).

Prior to 2009, the Company’s long-term incentive compensation had been comprised of annual equity grants (principally, restricted stock and/or stock options) under the Company’s Stock Plan. Since 2009 the Company has not implemented an annual equity award program under its Stock Plan. As of December 31, 2012, none of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Kennedy held any outstanding stock options (Mr. Kennedy’s

remaining stock options expired on April 22, 2013). Based on the $14.50 NYSE closing price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2012, all of Mr. Kennedy’s now-expired stock options were “out-of-the-money” on such date, as the $30.60 per share exercise price of his stock options exceeded the NYSE closing price at year end.

To enable the Company to maintain total compensation at competitive levels, in 2012 the Company granted LTIP awards under its Incentive Compensation Plan as it has done since 2010.

A history of the Company’s annual cash bonus and LTIP accruals, expressed as a percentage of target, is provided below, reflecting the Company’s improved financial performance over the period:


Incentive Compensation Program:	2008			2009			2010			2011			2012
Annual Cash Bonus		75	%		50	%		100	%		98	%		105	%
LTIP		—			—			100	%		98	%		105	%

Setting Pay; Market References

The Company’s Human Resources department and the Compensation Committee, with input from the Compensation Committee’s outside compensation consultant, consider the compensation of the Named Executive Officers in order to reward and retain the Company’s high-performing executives and incent them to maximize their performance in furtherance of the execution of the Company’s business plan.

As part of its assessment of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, the Company also compares each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation to the total compensation for executives at comparison group companies, both within and outside of the consumer products industry. The Company seeks to design its total compensation opportunity to be competitive with these comparison group companies, as the Company believes that the market for certain executive talent is broader than the consumer products field. When reviewing and setting Named Executive Officer compensation for 2012, the Company compared the total compensation of its executive officers to market compensation data for certain groups of companies in Towers Watson’s U.S. compensation data banks for similarly situated executives (sometimes referred to herein as “competitive benchmark norms” or “competitive benchmarks,” with such companies being referred to herein as the “Comparison Group”). The Comparison Group for 2012 consisted of the companies listed on Annex A.

Total Compensation

For 2012, the Named Executive Officers’ total compensation, compared against the 50^th and the 75^th percentiles of total compensation in the relevant Comparison Group, was as follows: (i) Mr. Ennis was below both the 50^th and the 75^th percentiles; (ii) Mr. Berns was at approximately the 50^th percentile and was below the 75^th percentile; (iii) Mr. Elshaw was above the 50^th percentile and below the 75^th percentile; and (iv) Mr. Kretzman was above both the 50^th and the 75^th percentiles. Given the nature of Mr. Kennedy’s role at the Company, which is not a full-time position, there is very limited comparable data available for 2012.

Base Salary

Base salary adjustments are considered annually and may be based on individual performance, assumption of new responsibilities, competitive data from the Comparison Group, employee retention efforts and the Company’s overall compensation guidelines and annual salary budget guidelines. Higher annual increases may be made to higher performers and key contributors, provided that the overall increases are within budgeted guidelines.

Incentive Compensation; Generally

Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and establishes the corporate performance targets for the Company’s incentive compensation programs, which are intended to have the effect of fostering shareholder

value creation, to ensure that the program design appropriately motivates executives to achieve the Company’s financial and operational performance goals, which are designed to be challenging and linked directly to the Company’s business plan. As more fully described below, the components of the Company’s 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs were a cash bonus under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, payable in March 2013, to the extent performance targets were achieved, and a cash LTIP award under the 2012 LTIP, payable in three equal annual installments beginning in March 2013, to the extent performance targets were achieved.

Payouts under the 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs were contingent upon the achievement of identified corporate performance targets and, for the individual, receipt of a performance rating of “target” or higher under the Company’s 2012 Performance Management Review process. Additionally, the exact payout to a participant under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program was based upon such individual’s degree of achievement of his or her own individual performance objectives.

The 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs featured a payout curve, to account for the extent to which the Company achieved the Company’s 2012 Performance Targets.

Under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, depending on the assessment of individual performance, participants could receive between 25% and 150% of their target award as long as the overall compensation budget was not exceeded.

The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and its Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer develop, for review and approval by the Compensation Committee, the objectives against which each Named Executive Officer’s performance is assessed. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer in conjunction with the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer and the Company’s Vice Chairman, develop, for review and approval by the Compensation Committee, the CEO’s objectives to support and drive the execution of the Company’s business strategy. These objectives are derived from the Company’s business plan and/or long-range plan and are established by the Compensation Committee at the start of the performance period and then reviewed after the end of the performance period to assess and certify the extent to which they have been achieved.

For 2012, the Named Executive Officers’ objectives included both quantitative financial measures and strategic and operational objectives linked directly to achieving the Company’s business strategy. When assessing the Named Executive Officers’ 2012 performance, in February 2013 the Compensation Committee reviewed and analyzed detailed and comprehensive documentary support for each Named Executive Officer’s accomplishments against his respective 2012 performance objectives, including the following (after adjustments for certain unbudgeted and extraordinary items, as previously noted):

Mr. Ennis — President and Chief Executive Officer:

•

the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Ennis’ target award was based, and the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Ennis’ target award was based;

•

the Company’s achievement of a 4.8% increase in net sales (excluding the impact of foreign currency), on which 20% of Mr. Ennis’ target award was based;

•

the continued development of the Company’s integrated business planning process and global portfolio planning process and the achievement of inventory management objectives, on which 10% of Mr. Ennis’ target award was based;

•

the continued improvement of the Company’s organizational capabilities through recruitment, succession planning and development planning, and the continued improvement in the execution of the Company’s performance management process, on which 10% of Mr. Ennis’ target award was based; and

•

the development of a 3-year strategic plan, the execution of identified global growth initiatives, the continued evaluation of acquisition opportunities to complement the Company’s portfolio (including, without limitation, the Company’s consummation of the acquisition of the Pure Ice color cosmetics business in July 2012), the achievement of cost saving opportunities, including the Company’s restructuring announced on September 5, 2012, and the establishment of orderly succession for certain management responsibilities, on which 10% of Mr. Ennis’ target award was based.

Mr. Berns — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:

•

the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Berns’ target award was based, and the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Berns’ target award was based;

•

the Company’s achievement of a 4.8% increase in net sales (excluding the impact of foreign currency), on which 20% of Mr. Berns’ target award was based;

•

the achievement of key functional objectives within the Finance area, including the development of a 3-year strategic plan; the continued evaluation of acquisition opportunities to complement the Company’s portfolio (including, without limitation, the Company’s consummation of the acquisition of the Pure Ice color cosmetics business in July 2012); the achievement of cost saving opportunities, including the restructuring announced on September 5, 2012; continued improvements within the information management function to enable a more efficient and effective business application environment; and continued improvements in the Company’s financial closing process, on which 10% of Mr. Berns’ target award was based.

Mr. Elshaw — Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer:

•

the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Elshaw’s target award was based, and the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Elshaw’s target award was based;

•

the Company’s achievement of a 4.8% increase in net sales (excluding the impact of foreign currency), on which 20% of Mr. Elshaw’s target award was based;

•

the development of a 3-year strategic plan, the execution of identified global growth initiatives, the continued evaluation of acquisition opportunities to complement the Company’s portfolio (including, without limitation, the Company’s consummation of the acquisition of the Pure Ice color cosmetics business in July 2012), and the achievement of cost saving opportunities, including the Company’s restructuring announced on September 5, 2012, on which 10% of Mr. Elshaw’s target award was based.

Mr. Kennedy — Vice Chairman:

•

the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target, on which 50% of Mr. Kennedy’s target award was based, and the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, on which 50% of Mr. Kennedy’s target award was based.

Mr. Kretzman — Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer:

•

the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Kretzman’s target award was based, and the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, on which 25% of Mr. Kretzman’s target award was based;

•

the Company’s achievement of a 4.8% increase in net sales (excluding the impact of foreign currency), on which 20% of Mr. Kretzman’s target award was based;

•

the achievement of key functional objectives within the Human Resource, Real Estate and Facilities Management and Security functions, including the provision of comprehensive support in all aspects of the Company’s business strategy; recruitment of key senior executives globally; implementing cost savings in the Company’s healthcare programs; the achievement of cost saving opportunities, including the restructuring announced on September 5, 2012; negotiating real estate and facility cost savings; the development and preparation of succession plans; and the continued evaluation of acquisition opportunities to complement the Company’s portfolio (including, without limitation, the Company’s consummation of the acquisition of the Pure Ice color cosmetics business in July 2012), on which 10% of Mr. Kretzman’s target award was based.

As noted above, based on the extent of the Company’s achievement of its 2012 Performance Targets, in February 2013, the Compensation Committee, applying the formulae set forth in, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of, the 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs, determined that such programs would be funded at 105%. Additionally, in February 2013, based upon a comprehensive review of each Named Executive Officer’s 2012 performance, the Compensation Committee determined that “target” performance or better had been achieved by each Named Executive Officer and also determined the extent to which the Named Executive Officers had achieved and in certain cases exceeded their respective individual performance objectives (including objectives for 2012 established in compliance with Section 162(m)). Based upon the foregoing determinations, bonuses and LTIP payouts were earned by each of the Named Executive Officers in respect of 2012 (see the “Summary Compensation Table,” below).

The Company’s confidentiality and non-competition agreement (which all employees, including the Named Executive Officers, are required to execute), Stock Plan and Incentive Compensation Plan condition each employee’s eligibility for benefits (including 2012 LTIP awards and 2012 annual cash bonuses) upon compliance with confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation obligations.

Incentive Compensation; Annual Cash Bonus

Approximately 430 employees, including the Named Executive Officers, were eligible to participate in the 2012 Annual Bonus Program. As noted above, the performance objectives for all employees in the 2012 Annual Bonus Program included the Company’s achievement of two equally-weighted performance targets (namely, its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target and its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target). Receipt of a bonus award

was further conditioned upon the participant’s achievement of a performance rating of “target” or higher under the Company’s 2012 Performance Management Review process, with the exact payout amount being subject to the degree of achievement of individual performance objectives linked directly to executing the Company’s 2012 business plan. As approved by the Compensation Committee, under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, management (or, in the case of the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee) had discretion to award between 25% and 150% of the target bonuses as long as the Company’s overall compensation budget was not exceeded.

Per the terms of their respective employment agreements, for 2012, each of Messrs. Ennis and Kennedy was eligible for a target bonus of 100% of his respective base salary, and each of Messrs. Berns, Elshaw and Kretzman was eligible for a target bonus of 75% of his respective base salary.

As discussed above, under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Overview of 2012 Compensation Events,” the Compensation Committee, applying the formula set forth in, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of, the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, determined to fund such program at 105%, and, based upon its determinations as to the Named Executive Officers’ respective performance ratings and the degree of achievement of their respective performance objectives, awarded Messrs. Ennis, Berns, Elshaw, Kennedy and Kretzman 105%, 102%, 102%, 105% and 105%, respectively, of their target bonuses for 2012.

The Summary Compensation Table, below, reflects the bonus award amounts that were earned for 2012 by the Named Executive Officers under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program.

Incentive Compensation; Long-Term Compensation

The third principal component of total compensation for the Company’s key employees is long-term incentive compensation awards. Prior to 2009, this had taken the form of an annual grant of equity awards, usually in the form of restricted stock and/or stock options, under the Stock Plan.

Since 2009, the Company has not implemented an annual equity award program under its Stock Plan as a component of long-term compensation. To enable the Company to maintain a competitive total compensation opportunity, the Company adopted a cash LTIP component under its Incentive Compensation Plan, effective from and after 2010. 2012 was the third year that the Company granted LTIP awards.

Approximately 60 senior employees, including the Named Executive Officers, were eligible to participate in the 2012 LTIP. Funding of the 2012 LTIP was based on the Company’s degree of achievement of two equally-weighted performance targets (namely, its 2012 EBITDA Performance Target and its 2012 Free Cash Flow Performance Target, as more fully described above).

Awards under the 2012 LTIP were structured as flat dollar amounts, tiered to levels of responsibility within the organization, and were approved by the Compensation Committee in December 2011. Once earned, based upon the degree of achievement of the Company’s 2012 Performance Targets, the award amount would be paid out in equal one-third amounts in March 2013, March 2014 and March 2015, provided the participant received a “target” or better performance rating under the Company’s Performance Management Review process for 2012 and remains employed with the Company on the applicable payment date. By deferring payments over three years for the 2012 performance period, the program’s structure is intended to have a retentive effect on the key personnel expected to implement the Company’s business plan and/or long-range plan.

In accordance with the Incentive Compensation Plan, as discussed above, under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Overview of 2012 Compensation Events,” the Compensation Committee determined to fund such program at 105% and, based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination as to each of the Named Executive Officers’ performance of their individual performance objectives at least at “target” during 2012, LTIP awards were earned by each of the Named Executive Officers in respect of 2012 in corresponding amounts as prescribed by the terms of the 2012 LTIP.

The Summary Compensation Table, below, reflects the 2012 LTIP awards that were earned for 2012 by the eligible Named Executive Officers under the 2012 LTIP, at their full, 3-year payout values, respectively.

Other Compensation and Benefit Programs

The Company also maintains standard benefits that are consistent with those offered by other major corporations and which are generally available to all of the Company’s full-time employees (subject to meeting basic eligibility requirements). These plans include medical, dental, vision and life insurance coverages that are available to all U.S.-based, non-union employees.

The Company also maintains a limited number of benefit programs that are available to the Named Executive Officers and other senior employees qualifying for eligibility based on salary grade level. These benefits and perquisites include an automobile allowance or use of a Company automobile and limited reimbursement of certain costs for financial counseling, tax preparation and life insurance premiums. These types of benefits are commonly made available to senior executives at other major corporations and assist the Company in retaining and attracting key talent.

How the Company Determines the Amount (and, Where Applicable, the Formula) for Each Element of Compensation to Pay and How Each Compensation Element and the Company’s Decisions Regarding that Element Fit into the Company’s Overall Compensation Objectives and May Affect Decisions Regarding Other Elements of Compensation

The Company focuses annually on developing a total compensation opportunity that is intended to be competitive such that the level of total compensation (i.e., base salary, annual cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation, combined) is targeted to be positioned at or about the 50th to 75th percentile of competitive benchmark norms. Salary ranges, annual cash bonus plan targets and long-term incentive compensation targets are reviewed using a “total compensation” perspective under which total remuneration is targeted to be within certain ranges compared to the Comparison Group. Values and targets of each element may change from performance period to performance period.

The Company designs its compensation programs such that there is a correlation between the level of position and the degree of risk in compensation. Based on that guiding principle, the Company’s more senior executives with the highest levels of responsibility and accountability have a higher percentage of their total potential remuneration at risk (in the form of performance-based annual cash bonuses and performance-based LTIP awards), than do employees with lower levels of responsibility and accountability. This means that a higher proportion of the Company’s more senior executives’ total potential compensation is based upon variable elements, than is the case with the Company’s employees with lower levels of responsibility and accountability.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves, among other things, compensation for the Company’s Named Executive Officers; the structure of the Company’s annual bonus program under the Incentive Compensation Plan, including setting annual performance objectives for the Named Executive Officers and annually assessing the extent to which those objectives have been achieved; and the structure of the Company’s long-term incentive programs under the Incentive Compensation Plan, including setting performance-based objectives and actual grants under the Company’s long-term incentive compensation award programs for the Named Executive Officers and assessing the extent to which those objectives have been achieved.

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves objectives relevant to the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, evaluates, together with the Governance Committee, the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in respect of those objectives and determines, either as a committee or together with the Governance Committee and/or the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation level based on that evaluation process. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves compensation and incentive arrangements for the Company’s other Named Executive Officers.

The Compensation Committee reviews key components of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation, which enables the Compensation Committee to make informed decisions regarding future elements of compensation.

The Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, in consultation with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, works with the Company’s Human Resources Department to recommend: (i) merit increase guidelines under the Company’s salary administration program; (ii) the structure of the Company’s annual bonus program under the Incentive Compensation Plan; and (iii) the structure of the Company’s long-term incentive compensation programs under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

As part of the Company’s processes and procedures for determining the amount and form of executive officer and director compensation, the Company’s Compensation Committee relies in part upon informed proposals and information provided by management, as well as market data, analysis and guidance provided by its outside compensation consultant. During 2012, the Compensation Committee consulted with and/or considered advice provided by its outside compensation advisor (Compensation Advisory Partners LLC (“CAP”)) with respect to the structure and components of the Company’s incentive compensation programs, as well as the total direct compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, inclusive of the March 2012 merit salary increases for the Named Executive Officers. CAP performed no services for the Company or the Compensation Committee during 2012 other than providing compensation advice to the Compensation Committee (or to the Company’s Human Resources Department in respect to routine compensation survey data analysis); without limiting the foregoing, CAP did not provide services such as benefits administration, human resources consulting or actuarial services. The Compensation Committee approved CAP’s engagement, upon management’s recommendation, and based upon CAP’s experience and qualifications. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all invoices from the outside compensation consultant prior to payment. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed whether there are any conflicts of interest with CAP or CAP’s compensation advisor to the Compensation Committee, and has determined that there are none.

As there has never been a restatement of the Company’s financial results, the Company has not considered any policy in respect of adjustment or recovery of amounts paid under its compensation plans.

Whether and, if so, How the Company has Considered the Results of the Most Recent Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation in Determining its Compensation Policies and Decisions

On June 2, 2011, the Company held its 2011 annual stockholders’ meeting at which approximately 99% of the stockholders who voted on the given items (i) approved, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the Company’s executive compensation, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including as disclosed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” compensation tables and accompanying narrative set forth in the 2011 proxy statement (“say-on-pay”), and (ii) recommended, on an advisory, non-binding basis, that the Company conduct future “say-on-pay” votes every three (3) years (which is the Company’s current intention). Although such advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation is non-binding, management has considered the results of such advisory vote when determining the Company’s compensation policies and decisions and believes that the above-referenced stockholder vote endorses the Company’s compensation philosophy, processes and practices, which have not varied in any meaningful way since such vote.

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that the Company may deduct, for tax purposes, in any one year for certain officers who constitute “covered employees” under the rule, unless such amounts are determined to be “qualified performance-based compensation” meeting certain requirements. Generally, the Company’s provision of cash incentive compensation under the Incentive Compensation Plan, stock option awards and performance-based stock awards is intended to meet the requirements for qualified

performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and thus, generally, those items are intended to be fully deductible. Salary, perquisites, discretionary bonuses and restricted stock that have time-based vesting generally are not considered performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and are generally subject to Section 162(m) limitations on deductibility. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible and retains discretion to award compensation that may not constitute qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). The 2012 annual bonus and LTIP performance objectives for the Company’s Named Executive Officers were approved under Section 162(m)’s guidelines for deductibility. Certain amounts of compensation for the Company’s officers do not meet Section 162(m)’s performance-based requirements and therefore are not deductible by the Company.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information for the years indicated concerning the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the persons who served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer during 2012 and the three other most highly paid executive officers who served as executive officers of the Company during 2012 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during such periods. The “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table, below, presents bonus and LTIP payments earned under the Incentive Compensation Plan. As discussed above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Overview of 2012 Compensation Events,” the 2012 Annual Bonus Program and the 2012 LTIP were each funded at 105% of target amounts by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the formulae set forth in such programs. Although 2012 LTIP awards have been listed in the table below at their full-value, which reflects funding such program at 105% of target for 2012 LTIP awards, only one-third of such amounts has actually been paid (in March 2013); the remaining two-thirds of such 2012 LTIP awards are payable in March 2014 and March 2015, if the executive remains employed with the Company on each respective payout date, unless provided otherwise in the executive’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements and Payments upon Termination and Change of Control”).

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(a)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(b)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(c)		All Other Compensation ($)(d)		Total ($)
Alan T. Ennis		2012		921,235		—		2,226,000		25,410		65,989		3,238,634
President and Chief Executive Officer		2011		910,000		—		2,067,800		34,632		65,523		3,077,955
President and Chief Executive Officer		2010		907,980		—		2,075,000		19,557		91,777		3,094,314

Steven Berns		2012		482,069		—		892,500		32,257		49,849		1,456,675
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2011		469,560		227		837,673		42,971		48,797		1,399,228
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2010		448,211		22,125		837,875		18,098		62,393		1,388,702

Chris Elshaw		2012		758,312		—		1,102,500		5,263		220,121		2,086,196
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		2011		746,355		—		1,024,100		8,598		209,697		1,988,750
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		2010		729,346		—		1,025,000		5,394		226,382		1,986,122

David L. Kennedy		2012		150,576		—		420,000		11,664		24,000		606,240
Vice Chairman		2011		150,000		—		—		37,933		24,000		211,933
Vice Chairman		2010		614,038		—		—		23,949		52,984		690,971

Robert K. Kretzman		2012		770,272		—		1,130,850		1,210,262		95,227		3,206,611
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer		2011		758,134		—		1,049,090		1,309,330		81,810		3,198,364
		2010		740,857		17,716		1,057,284		612,947		77,794		2,506,598

(a)

The amounts set forth under the “Bonus” column reflect the portion of any annual bonus amount paid to the Named Executive Officer based upon such executive’s performance, pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s authority under the Incentive Compensation Plan, in excess of such executive’s target bonus for the year, as adjusted for bonus program funding levels (see “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in this table for bonuses earned pursuant to bonus program formulas under such Plan).

(b)

The amounts set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflect the portion of the bonus amount paid to the Named Executive Officer based on the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of specific performance factors, pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s authority under the Incentive Compensation Plan, plus, for 2010, 2011 and 2012, the full, 3-year payout value of the executive’s annual LTIP award earned. Note that, although 2010, 2011 and 2012 LTIP awards

have been listed in the table above at their full, 3-year payout value per SEC interpretative rules, two-thirds of the 2012 LTIP awards remain payable in March 2014 and March 2015, and one-third of the 2011 LTIP awards remains payable in March 2014, if the executive remains employed with the Company on each respective payout date, unless provided otherwise in the executive’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements and Payments upon Termination and Change of Control”).

For Mr. Ennis, for 2012, the amount set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflects $966,000 in cash bonus plus $1,260,000 in LTIP, of which LTIP amount only one-third has been paid in respect to 2012 (the remaining two-thirds of such 2012 LTIP award are to be paid out in equal amounts in March 2014 and March 2015).

For Mr. Berns, for 2012, the amount set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflects $367,500 in cash bonus plus $525,000 in LTIP, of which LTIP amount only one-third has been paid in respect to 2012 (the remaining two-thirds of such 2012 LTIP award are to be paid out in equal amounts in March 2014 and March 2015).

For Mr. Elshaw, for 2012, the amount set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflects $577,500 in cash bonus plus $525,000 in LTIP, of which LTIP amount only one-third has been paid in respect to 2012 (the remaining two-thirds of such 2012 LTIP award are to be paid out in equal amounts in March 2014 and March 2015).

For Mr. Kennedy, for 2012, the amount set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflects $157,500 in cash bonus plus $262,500 in LTIP, of which LTIP amount only one-third has been paid in respect to 2012 (the remaining two-thirds of such 2012 LTIP award are to be paid out in equal amounts in March 2014 and March 2015).

For Mr. Kretzman, for 2012, the amount set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflects $605,850 in cash bonus plus $525,000 in LTIP, of which LTIP amount only one-third has been paid in respect to 2012 (the remaining two-thirds of such 2012 LTIP award are to be paid out in equal amounts in March 2014 and March 2015).

(c)

The amounts under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column have been calculated based on the aggregate change in actuarial present value of the Named Executive Officers’ accumulated benefit under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan from January 1 to December 31 of each reported year and based on, with respect to 2012, the assumptions as set forth in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 Form 10-K”); with respect to 2011, the assumptions as set forth in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”); and with respect to 2010, the assumptions as set forth in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These amounts have been calculated based on normal retirement age of 65 as specified in the Retirement Plan and Pension Equalization Plan. The Pension Equalization Plan is a non-qualified and unfunded plan. In May 2009, the Company amended the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan to cease future benefit accruals under such plans after December 31, 2009.

•

For Mr. Ennis, who has over 7 years of service with the Company, this amount includes $11,463, $15,624 and $8,823 under the Retirement Plan and $13,947, $19,008 and $10,734 under the Pension Equalization Plan for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

•

For Mr. Berns, who has over 10 years of service with the Company (due to credited service during his period of employment with the Company from April 1992 to August 1999), this amount includes $22,331, $29,749 and $12,529 under the Retirement Plan and $9,926, $13,222, and $5,569 under the Pension Equalization Plan for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

•

For Mr. Elshaw, who has over 11 years of service with the Company, this amount includes $2,664, $4,352 and $2,730 under the Retirement Plan and $2,599, $4,246 and $2,664 under the Pension Equalization Plan for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

•

For Mr. Kennedy, who has over 10 years of service with the Company, this amount includes $2,638, $8,580 and $5,417 under the Retirement Plan and $9,026, $29,353 and $18,532 under the Pension Equalization Plan for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

•

For Mr. Kretzman, who has over 24 years of service with the Company, this amount includes $103,031, $171,179 and $74,057 under the Retirement Plan, and $316,783, $526,311 and $227,706 under the Pension Equalization Plan for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $790,448, $611,840 and $311,184 under his employment agreement for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The pension plans were frozen on December 31, 2009. Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement provides that he continues to accrue retirement benefits through his retirement date, and that he is entitled to a retirement benefit at and after age 60. The aggregate change in the actuarial present value of Mr. Kretzman’s accumulated benefit calculated under the Retirement Plan, the Pension Equalization Plan and his employment agreement for 2012 is, respectively, $88,551, $272,263 and $1,083,373, based on retirement at age 60.

(d)

Mr. Ennis. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for Mr. Ennis for 2012 consists of a car allowance; tax preparation services; life insurance premiums; profit sharing contributions (including $41,181 of profit sharing contributions under the Amended and Restated Revlon Excess Savings Plan (the “Excess Savings Plan”) and the 401(k) Plan); and matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

Mr. Berns. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for Mr. Berns for 2012 consists of a car allowance; life insurance premiums; tax preparation services; profit sharing contributions (including $21,502 of profit sharing contributions under the Excess Savings Plan and the 401(k) Plan); and matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

Mr. Elshaw. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for Mr. Elshaw for 2012 consists of $150,000 in housing allowance (as Mr. Elshaw relocated to the U.S. from the U.K. at the Company’s request in connection with his promotion in 2007 to Executive Vice President and General Manager, U.S. Region, prior to his being appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2009; such allowance expired on December 31, 2012); a car allowance; tax preparation services and financial counseling; life insurance premiums; profit-sharing contributions (including $33,898 of profit sharing contributions under the Excess Savings Plan and the 401(k) Plan); and matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

Mr. Kennedy. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for Mr. Kennedy for 2012 consists of a car allowance; profit sharing contributions; and matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

Mr. Kretzman. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for Mr. Kretzman for 2012 consists of $21,378 in tax gross ups in respect of imputed income arising from use of a Company automobile and life insurance premiums; and other compensation in respect of use of a Company automobile; life insurance and medical plan premiums; tax preparation services and financial counseling; and matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

Employment Agreements and Payments Upon Termination and Change of Control

Termination Payments

Each of Messrs. Ennis, Berns, Elshaw, Kennedy and Kretzman, who were the Company’s Named Executive Officers during 2012, has an executive employment agreement with Products Corporation.

Mr. Ennis

Mr. Ennis’ employment agreement provides that Mr. Ennis will serve as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, at an annual base salary of not less than $919,100 (which was his base salary as of December 31, 2012), with a target bonus of 100% of his base salary.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Ennis is eligible to participate in fringe benefit programs and perquisites as may be generally made available to other senior executives of Products Corporation, including a

car allowance and financial planning and tax preparation assistance. The employment agreement for Mr. Ennis also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Ennis’ employment agreement effective 24 months after written notice of non-extension of the agreement, and Mr. Ennis may terminate his employment agreement upon 60 days’ prior written notice following a material uncured breach by Products Corporation of its obligations to Mr. Ennis under such agreement. Mr. Ennis’ employment agreement provides that, in the event of termination of employment by Mr. Ennis for any material breach by Products Corporation of any of its obligations under his employment agreement or by Products Corporation (other than for “cause” as defined in Mr. Ennis’ employment agreement or disability), Mr. Ennis would be entitled to continued payments of base salary throughout the 24-month severance period, payment of a prorated target bonus, if and to the extent bonuses are payable to executives under the Incentive Compensation Plan for that year based upon achievement of objectives, and continued participation in Products Corporation’s life insurance plan, subject to a limit of two years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans, throughout the severance period or until Mr. Ennis is covered by like plans of another company and continued participation during the severance period in the other perquisites of Products Corporation for which he was eligible on the termination date.

The estimated aggregate total of termination benefits during the 24-month severance period if Mr. Ennis had been terminated without “cause” on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $2,845,906, consisting of the following: (a) two times Mr. Ennis’ annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) $919,100, representing Mr. Ennis’ 2012 target bonus; (c) 24 months of life insurance coverage at a cost of approximately $8,430; (d) 24 months of medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $33,176; (e) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000; and (f) 24 months of car allowance, at a cost of approximately $30,000. All of Mr. Ennis’ severance payments are conditional on his full compliance with the Company’s comprehensive agreement as to confidentiality and non-competition during any severance period.

Mr. Berns

Mr. Berns’ employment agreement provides that Mr. Berns will serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, at an annual base salary of not less than $481,525 (which was his base salary as of December 31, 2012), with a target bonus of 75% of his base salary.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Berns is eligible to participate in fringe benefit programs and perquisites as may be generally made available to other senior executives of Products Corporation, including a car allowance and financial planning and tax preparation assistance. The employment agreement for Mr. Berns also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Berns’ employment agreement effective 24 months after written notice of non-extension of the agreement and Mr. Berns may terminate his employment agreement upon 60 days’ prior written notice following a material uncured breach by Products Corporation of its obligations to Mr. Berns under such agreement. Mr. Berns’ employment agreement provides that, in the event of termination of employment by Mr. Berns for any material uncured breach by Products Corporation of any of its obligations under his employment agreement, or by Products Corporation (other than for “cause” as defined in Mr. Berns’ employment agreement or disability), Mr. Berns would be entitled to continued payments of base salary throughout the 24-month severance period, payment of a prorated target bonus, if and to the extent bonuses are payable to executives under the Incentive Compensation Plan for that year based upon achievement of objectives, continued participation in Products Corporation’s life insurance plan, subject to a limit of two years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans, throughout the severance period or until Mr. Berns is covered by like plans of another company, and continued participation during the severance period in the other perquisites of Products Corporation for which he was eligible on the termination date.

The estimated aggregate total of termination benefits during the 24-month severance period if Mr. Berns had been terminated without “cause” on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $1,408,789, consisting of the following: (a) two times Mr. Berns’ annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) $361,144, representing Mr. Berns’ 2012 target bonus; (c) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $4,419; (d) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $33,176; (e) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000; and (f) 24 months of car allowance, at a cost of approximately $30,000. All of Mr. Berns’ severance payments are conditional on his full compliance with the Company’s comprehensive agreement as to confidentiality and non-competition during any severance period.

Mr. Elshaw

Mr. Elshaw’s employment agreement provides that Mr. Elshaw will serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, at an annual base salary of not less than $756,556 (which was his base salary as of December 31, 2012), with a target bonus of 75% of his base salary.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Elshaw, who relocated to the U.S. from the U.K. at the Company’s request in connection with his promotion in 2007 to Executive Vice President and General Manager, U.S. Region, prior to his being appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2009, receives a $150,000 annual housing allowance through December 31, 2012, and is eligible to participate in fringe benefit programs and perquisites as may be generally made available to other senior executives of Products Corporation, including a car allowance and financial planning and tax preparation assistance. The employment agreement for Mr. Elshaw also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Elshaw’s employment agreement effective 24 months after written notice of non-extension of the agreement. Mr. Elshaw’s employment agreement provides that, in the event of termination of employment by Products Corporation (other than for “cause” as defined in Mr. Elshaw’s employment agreement or disability), Mr. Elshaw would be entitled to continued payments of base salary throughout the 24-month severance period, payment of a prorated target bonus, if and to the extent bonuses are payable to executives under the Incentive Compensation Plan for that year based upon achievement of objectives, continued participation in Products Corporation’s life insurance plan, subject to a limit of two years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans, throughout the severance period or until Mr. Elshaw is covered by like plans of another company, and repatriation to the U.K.

The estimated aggregate total of termination benefits during the 24-month severance period if Mr. Elshaw had been terminated without “cause” on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $2,109,948, consisting of the following: (a) two times Mr. Elshaw’s annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) $567,417, representing Mr. Elshaw’s 2012 target bonus; (c) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $6,940; (d) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $9,479; and (e) repatriation from the U.S. to the U.K, at a cost of approximately $13,000. All of Mr. Elshaw’s severance payments are conditional on his full compliance with the Company’s comprehensive agreement as to confidentiality and non-competition during any severance period.

Mr. Kennedy

Mr. Kennedy’s employment agreement provides that he will serve as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors at an annual base salary of not less than $150,000 (which was his base salary as of December 31, 2012), with a target bonus of 100% of his base salary.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Kennedy is eligible to participate in fringe benefit programs and perquisites as may be generally made available to senior executives of Products Corporation of Mr. Kennedy’s

level, including a car allowance and financial planning and tax preparation assistance. Mr. Kennedy’s employment agreement also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Kennedy’s employment agreement effective 24 months after written notice of non-extension of the agreement, and Mr. Kennedy may terminate his employment agreement at any time upon 60 days’ prior written notice following a material uncured breach by Products Corporation of its obligations to Mr. Kennedy under such agreement. Mr. Kennedy’s employment agreement provides that, in the event of termination of employment by Mr. Kennedy for any material breach by Products Corporation of any of its obligations under his employment agreement, or by Products Corporation (other than for “cause” as defined in the employment agreement or for disability), Mr. Kennedy would be entitled to continued payments of base salary throughout the 24-month severance period, payment of a prorated target bonus, if and to the extent bonuses are payable to executives under the Incentive Compensation Plan for that year based upon achievement of objectives, continued participation in Products Corporation’s life insurance plan, subject to a limit of two years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans, throughout the severance period or until Mr. Kennedy is covered by like plans of another company, and continued participation during the severance period in the other perquisites of Products Corporation for which he was eligible on the termination date. Pursuant to his current employment agreement, in the event Mr. Kennedy’s employment is terminated by Products Corporation without “cause” or by Mr. Kennedy for “good reason,” or upon his retirement, the unpaid portion of all previously-earned LTIP awards would continue to remain payable, in accordance with their terms (in consideration for which, the non-competition covenants referred to in Mr. Kennedy’s employment agreement would remain in effect until the date that all earned LTIP awards are paid).

The estimated aggregate total of termination benefits during the 24-month severance period if Mr. Kennedy had been terminated without “cause” on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $501,230, consisting of the following: (a) two times Mr. Kennedy’s annual base salary on December 31, 2012 (his base salary on December 31, 2012 was $150,000); (b) $150,000, representing Mr. Kennedy’s 2012 target bonus; (c) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $230; (d) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $4,000; (e) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a total cost of approximately $17,000; and (f) 24 months of car allowance, at a cost of approximately $30,000. Mr. Kennedy does not currently participate in the Company’s standard group medical and dental plans. Under such circumstances, pursuant to his current employment agreement, Mr. Kennedy would also be entitled to the continued payout, on the respective annual payout dates in March 2013, March 2014 and March 2015, as applicable, of the remaining unpaid portion of his $262,500 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012). All of Mr. Kennedy’s severance payments are conditional on his full compliance with the Company’s comprehensive agreement as to confidentiality and non-competition during any severance period.

Mr. Kretzman

Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement provides that he will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, at an annual base salary of not less than $768,487 (which was his base salary as of December 31, 2012), with a target bonus of 75% of his base salary.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Kretzman is eligible for participation in fringe benefit programs and perquisites as may be generally made available to senior executives of Products Corporation of Mr. Kretzman’s level, including financial planning and tax preparation assistance; use of an automobile; supplemental term life insurance coverage of two times Mr. Kretzman’s base salary; executive medical plan coverage; continued accrual of retirement benefits until his retirement date (in lieu of any discretionary profit sharing contributions); and a retirement benefit at and after age 60 without regard to the early retirement reductions he would otherwise be subject to under the Retirement Plan and Pension Equalization Plan and giving effect to his years of service and compensation through his retirement date. Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement also provides for protection of Company confidential information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement effective 24 months after written notice of non-extension of the agreement. Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement provides that, in the event of termination of employment by Mr. Kretzman for any material breach by Products Corporation of any of its obligations under his employment agreement or for “good reason” (as set forth in Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement), or by Products Corporation (other than for “cause,” as defined in the employment agreement, or for disability), Mr. Kretzman would be entitled to continued payments of base salary throughout the 24-month severance period, payment of a prorated target bonus, if and to the extent bonuses are payable to executives under the Incentive Compensation Plan for that year based upon achievement of objectives, continued participation in Products Corporation’s life insurance plan, subject to a limit of two years, and medical, dental and executive medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans, throughout the severance period or until Mr. Kretzman is covered by like plans of another company, and continued participation during the severance period in the other perquisites of Products Corporation for which he was eligible on the termination date. In the event Mr. Kretzman’s employment is terminated by Products Corporation without “cause” or by Mr. Kretzman for “good reason,” or upon his retirement, all restricted stock and stock option awards held by Mr. Kretzman would continue to vest and remain exercisable, and the unpaid portion of all previously-earned LTIP awards would continue to remain payable, in accordance with their terms (in consideration for which, the non-competition covenants referred to in Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement would remain in effect until the date that all existing equity awards are fully vested and all earned LTIP awards are paid). As of December 31, 2012, all of Mr. Kretzman’s restricted stock awards had fully vested and all of his stock option awards had expired.

The estimated aggregate total of termination benefits during the 24-month severance period if Mr. Kretzman had been terminated without “cause” on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $2,296,029, consisting of the following: (a) two times Mr. Kretzman’s annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) $576,365, representing his 2012 target bonus; (c) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $42,476; (d) 24 months of medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $52,398; (e) 24 months of use of an automobile, at a cost of approximately $70,816; and (f) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000. Under such circumstances, Mr. Kretzman would also be entitled to the continued payout, on the respective annual payout dates in March 2013, March 2014 and March 2015, as applicable, of the remaining unpaid portion of his $500,000 2010 LTIP award (one-third of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), his $490,000 2011 LTIP award (two-thirds of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012) and his $525,000 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012). Mr. Kretzman’s severance payments are conditional on his full compliance with the Company’s comprehensive agreement as to confidentiality and non-competition during any severance period.

Change of Control Payments

Each of Messrs. Ennis’, Berns’, Elshaw’s, Kennedy’s and Kretzman’s employment agreements provides that, in the event of any “change of control,” the terms of their employment agreements would be extended for an additional 24 months from the effective date of any such “change of control.” Each of their employment agreements also provides that if, within this 24-month period, the executive were to terminate his employment with the Company for “good reason” or if the Company were to terminate the executive’s employment other than for “cause,” he would receive: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to two times the sum of (a) the executive’s base salary and (b) the executive’s average gross bonus earned over the five calendar years prior to termination; and (ii) 24 months of continuation of all fringe benefits in which the executive participated on the “change of control” effective date or, in lieu of such benefits, a lump-sum cash payment equal to the value of such benefits. Each of their employment agreements also provides that, in the event of a “change of control,” all then-unvested stock options and restricted shares held by them shall immediately vest and become fully exercisable.

Under the Incentive Compensation Plan, if, in connection with a “change of control,” a successor entity assumes the LTIP, does not terminate the LTIP or provides participants with comparable LTIP benefits, then the LTIP awards remain payable in accordance with their terms. Otherwise, upon a “change of control,” LTIP awards related to the performance period when the event occurred are to be paid at target on a pro-rated basis

(based on the number of days elapsed) within 60 days following such “change of control,” and (ii) LTIP awards related to prior performance periods as to which the respective performance objectives were achieved, but for which payments remain outstanding, are to be paid within 60 days following such “change of control.”

The estimated aggregate total of benefits upon a “change of control” and subsequent termination if Mr. Ennis had been terminated on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $3,398,886, consisting of the following: (a) two times his annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) two times his average 5-year bonus of $687,180; (c) two years of contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (d) approximately $82,720 in respect of two years of profit sharing contributions under the 401(k) Plan; (e) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $8,430; (f) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $33,176; (g) 24 months of car allowance at a total cost of approximately $30,000; and (h) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000. Upon a “change of control” without the successor entity assuming or otherwise continuing the terms of the LTIP, Mr. Ennis also would be entitled to the payout of the remaining unpaid portion of his $1,200,000 2010 LTIP award (one-third of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), the remaining unpaid portion of his $1,176,000 2011 LTIP award (two-thirds of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), and the remaining unpaid portion of his $1,260,000 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), which was earned for each of 2010, 2011 and 2012 based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination that the Company had achieved its 2010, 2011 and 2012 performance targets and that the executive had earned a “target” or better performance rating for each such year.

The estimated aggregate total of benefits upon a “change of control” and subsequent termination if Mr. Berns had been terminated on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $1,725,505, consisting of the following: (a) two times his annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) two times his 5-year average bonus of $309,761; (c) two years of contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (d) approximately $43,338 in respect of two years of profit sharing contributions under the 401(k) Plan; (e) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $4,419; (f) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $33,176; (g) 24 months of car allowance at a cost of approximately $30,000; and (h) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000. Upon a “change of control” without the successor entity assuming or otherwise continuing the terms of the LTIP, Mr. Berns also would be entitled to the payout of the remaining unpaid portion of his $500,000 2010 LTIP award (one-third of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), the remaining unpaid portion of his $490,000 2011 LTIP award (two-thirds of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), and the remaining unpaid portion of his $525,000 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), which was earned for each of 2010, 2011 and 2012 based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination that the Company had achieved its 2010, 2011 and 2012 performance objectives and that the executive had earned a “target” or better performance rating for each such year.

The estimated aggregate total of benefits upon a “change of control” and subsequent termination if Mr. Elshaw had been terminated on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $2,589,228, consisting of the following: (a) two times his annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) two times his average 5-year bonus of $455,303; (c) two years of contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (d) approximately $68,090 in respect of two years of profit sharing contributions under the 401(k) Plan; (e) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $6,940; (f) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $9,479; (g) 24 months of car allowance, at a cost of approximately $30,000; (h) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000; and (i) the cost of two annual trips to the U.K. and airfare to repatriate Mr. Elshaw back to the U.K., as he relocated to the U.S. from the U.K. at the Company’s request in connection with his promotion in 2007 to Executive Vice President and General Manager, U.S. Region, prior to his being appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2009, at a total cost of approximately $19,000. Upon a “change of control” without the successor entity assuming or otherwise continuing the terms of the LTIP, Mr. Elshaw also would be entitled to the payout of the remaining unpaid portion of his $500,000 2010 LTIP award (one-third of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), the remaining unpaid portion of his $490,000 2011 LTIP award (two-thirds of which

remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), and the remaining unpaid portion of his $525,000 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), which was earned for each of 2010, 2011 and 2012 based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination that the Company had achieved its 2010, 2011 and 2012 performance targets and that the executive had earned a “target” or better performance rating for each such year.

The estimated aggregate total of benefits upon a “change of control” and subsequent termination if Mr. Kennedy had been terminated on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $823,730, consisting of the following: (a) two times his annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) two times his 5-year average bonus of $225,000 as of December 31, 2012; (c) two years of contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (d) two years of profit sharing contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (e) 24 months of life insurance coverage, at a cost of approximately $230; (f) 24 months of group medical and dental insurance coverage, at a total cost of approximately $4,000; (g) 24 months of car allowance at a cost of approximately $30,000; and (h) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000. Upon a “change of control” without the successor entity assuming or otherwise continuing the terms of the LTIP, Mr. Kennedy also would be entitled to the payout of the remaining unpaid portion of his $262,500 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid on December 31, 2012), which was earned for 2012 based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination that the Company had achieved its 2012 performance targets and that the executive had earned a “target” or better performance rating for such year.

The estimated aggregate total of benefits upon a “change of control” and subsequent termination if Mr. Kretzman had been terminated on December 31, 2012 would have been approximately $3,261,846, consisting of the following: (a) two times his annual base salary on December 31, 2012; (b) two times his 5-year average bonus of $481,091; (c) two years of contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (d) approximately $565,000 in respect of two additional years of service credit for purposes of his retirement benefit; (e) 24 months of life insurance coverage at a cost of approximately $42,476; (f) 24 months of medical and dental insurance coverage at a total cost of approximately $52,398; (g) 24 months of use of a Company automobile at a cost of approximately $70,816; and (h) 24 months of tax preparation and financial counseling, at a cost of approximately $17,000. Upon a “change of control” without the successor entity assuming or otherwise continuing the terms of the LTIP, Mr. Kretzman also would be entitled to the payout of the remaining unpaid portion of his $500,000 2010 LTIP award (one-third of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), the remaining unpaid portion of his $490,000 2011 LTIP award (two-thirds of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), and the remaining unpaid portion of his $525,000 2012 LTIP award (all of which remained unpaid as of December 31, 2012), which was earned for each of 2010, 2011 and 2012 based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination that the Company had achieved its 2010, 2011 and 2012 performance targets and that the executive had earned a “target” or better performance rating for each such year.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table presents information about the non-equity, plan-based awards that were granted to Named Executive Officers in the last completed fiscal year. During 2012, none of the Named Executive Officers received any equity awards from the Company.

The Compensation Committee granted, and authorized the payment of, performance-based LTIP awards and annual cash bonuses to eligible Named Executive Officers in respect to 2012 under the 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs, the structure and design of, and performance factors for, which were adopted, ratified and approved by the Compensation Committee pursuant to its authority under the Incentive Compensation Plan. In all cases, amounts earned were based upon the Company’s degree of achievement of its 2012 Performance Targets, which was reviewed and certified by the Compensation Committee, which also reviewed and made determinations in respect to the Named Executive Officers’ respective achievement of their personal objectives. For amounts actually awarded in respect to 2012, see the “Summary Compensation Table,” above, and for additional factors relevant to an understanding of the 2012 Incentive Compensation Programs, and the below table, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” above.


Name	Estimated Possible Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
	2012 LTIP(1)								2012 Annual Bonus Program(2)
	Threshold		Target		Maximum		LTIP Payout Dates		Threshold		Target		Maximum
							(in each case, as to one-third of award amount)
Alan Ennis President and Chief Executive Officer	$	0	$	1,200,000	$	1,800,000		March 2013, 2014 & 2015	$	0	$	919,100	$	1,378,650
Steven Berns EVP and Chief Financial Officer	$	0	$	500,000	$	750,000		March 2013, 2014 & 2015	$	0	$	361,144	$	541,716
Chris Elshaw EVP and Chief Operating Officer	$	0	$	500,000	$	750,000		March 2013, 2014 & 2015	$	0	$	567,417	$	851,126
David Kennedy Vice Chairman	$	0	$	250,000	$	375,000		March 2013, 2014 & 2015	$	0	$	150,000	$	225,000
Robert Kretzman EVP and Chief Administrative Officer	$	0	$	500,000	$	750,000		March 2013, 2014 & 2015	$	0	$	576,365	$	864,548

(1)

Awards under the 2012 LTIP were structured as flat dollar amounts that could be earned upon achievement of the Company’s 2012 Performance Targets, subject to the grantee achieving at least target performance on his 2012 Performance Management Review. Payouts to grantees of earned awards under the 2012 LTIP are to be made in equal one-third amounts over three years, one-third of which was paid in March 2013, with the remaining two-thirds payable in equal installments in March 2014 and March 2015, if the grantee is employed with the Company on the remaining payout dates, unless provided otherwise in the executive’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements and Payments upon Termination and Change of Control”). Pursuant to its terms, the 2012 LTIP would not be funded, and no award would be payable, if the Company were to achieve less than 85% of its 2012 Performance Targets (represented by the “Threshold” column, above); the 2012 LTIP could have been funded at the “Target” level if the Company achieved 100% of its 2012 Performance Targets; and the 2012 LTIP could have been funded at 150% of the “Target” level for achievement by the Company of 120% of its 2012 Performance Targets (represented by the “Maximum” column, above). As discussed above under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis —

Overview of 2012 Compensation Events,” the Compensation Committee determined to fund the 2012 LTIP at 105% of the “Target” level, in accordance with the Incentive Compensation Plan and pursuant to the formula set forth in the 2012 LTIP. The actual amounts awarded are included in the “Summary Compensation Table,” above, in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” For additional information about the 2012 LTIP, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” above.

(2)

The amounts under this column represent the possible payout under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program under the Incentive Compensation Plan. The amounts shown represent the threshold, target, and maximum payouts for annual cash bonuses under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program with respect to services in 2012, based on performance against pre-established performance measures. The amount under the “Target” column represents the target award opportunity, which is set as a percentage of base salary under the Named Executive Officers’ respective employment agreements. Pursuant to its terms, the 2012 Annual Bonus Program would not be funded, and no award would be payable, if the Company were to achieve less than 85% of its 2012 Performance Targets (represented by the “Threshold” column, above); the 2012 Annual Bonus Program could have been funded at the “Target” level if the Company achieved 100% of its 2012 Performance goals; and the 2012 Annual Bonus Program could have been funded at 150% of the “Target” level for achievement by the Company of 120% of its 2012 Performance Targets (represented by the “Maximum” column, above). In addition, under the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, managers (or, for Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee) retained the discretion to award between 25% and 150% of target awards, to reward comparative performance, provided the overall bonus pool was not exceeded. As discussed above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Overview of 2012 Compensation Events,” the Compensation Committee determined to fund the 2012 Annual Bonus Program at 105% of the “Target” level, in accordance with the Incentive Compensation Plan and pursuant to the formula set forth in the 2012 Annual Bonus Program. The actual amounts awarded are included in the “Summary Compensation Table,” above, in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” For additional information about the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” above.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table sets forth certain information regarding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s Stock Plan which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2012. The Company last implemented an annual equity award program under the Stock Plan in 2008. As of December 31, 2012, all restricted stock awards previously granted under the Stock Plan to any Named Executive Officer had fully vested. As of December 31, 2012, the only Named Executive Officer to hold Company stock options was Mr. Kennedy, as all other stock options previously granted under the Stock Plan to Named Executive Officers had expired by that date (Mr. Kennedy’s remaining stock options expired on April 22, 2013). As the $14.50 per share NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2012 was lower than the exercise price for Mr. Kennedy’s stock options outstanding on December 31, 2012, all of Mr. Kennedy’s now-expired stock options had no realizable monetary value as of December 31, 2012. As the NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the Record Date was $22.10 per share, all of such options remained as of such date “out-of-the-money.”


	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable (a)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (a)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Alan T. Ennis President and Chief Executive Officer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Steven Berns Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Chris Elshaw Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
David L. Kennedy Vice Chairman		5,000		—		—		30.60		4/22/2013		—		—		—		—
Robert K. Kretzman Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

(a)	Grant dates and vesting for options listed in the table are as follows:

•

Mr. Kennedy was granted 5,000 stock options at an exercise price of $30.60 per share on April 22, 2003. The options vested 25% on each anniversary of the grant date and were fully vested on April 22, 2007. As noted in the above table, this option grant expired, unexercised, after December 31, 2012 and prior to the date of this Proxy Statement.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth the value of restricted stock held by the Named Executive Officers which vested during 2012, with the value determined by multiplying the number of shares that vested during 2012 by the NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the vesting date. None of the Named Executive Officers sold any of their shares of formerly restricted stock that vested during 2012.


	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)(a)
Alan T. Ennis President and Chief Executive Officer		—		—		16,200		229,716
Steven Berns Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		—		—		8,334		120,426
Chris Elshaw Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		—		—		16,201		229,730
David L. Kennedy Vice Chairman		—		—		28,084		398,231
Robert K. Kretzman Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer		—		—		12,867		182,454

(a)	The aggregate dollar amount realized upon the vesting of restricted shares was computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock that vested during 2012 by the NYSE closing price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the respective vesting dates.

•

Mr. Ennis had 16,200 shares of restricted stock vest on January 10, 2012. Of this amount, 6,064 shares were withheld by the Company to cover tax withholding obligations; such withheld shares were not sold on the open market and became treasury shares. The NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on January 10, 2012 was $14.18 per share.

•

Mr. Berns had 8,334 shares of restricted stock vest on July 2, 2012. Of this amount, 3,007 shares were withheld by the Company to cover tax withholding obligations; such withheld shares were not sold on the open market and became treasury shares. The NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on July 2, 2012 was $14.45 per share.

•

Mr. Elshaw had 16,201 shares of restricted stock vest on January 10, 2012. Of this amount, 6,772 shares were withheld by the Company to cover tax withholding obligations; such withheld shares were not sold on the open market and became treasury shares. The NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on January 10, 2012 was $14.18 per share.

•

Mr. Kennedy had 28,084 shares of restricted stock vest on January 10, 2012. Of this amount, 10,438 shares were withheld by the Company to cover tax withholding obligations; such withheld shares were not sold on the open market and became treasury shares. The NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on January 10, 2012 was $14.18 per share.

•

Mr. Kretzman had 12,867 shares of restricted stock vest on January 10, 2012. Of this amount, 4,880 shares were withheld by the Company to cover tax withholding obligations; such withheld shares were not sold on the open market and became treasury shares. The NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on January 10, 2012 was $14.18 per share.

PENSION BENEFITS

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2012, the number of years of credited service under the plans, and the present value of accumulated benefit and payments during the last fiscal year, with respect to each Named Executive Officer under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan, as described below.


Name	Plan Name	Number of Years of Credited Service (#)		Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(a)		Payments During 2012 ($)
Alan T. Ennis	Retirement Plan		4.75		85,882		—
President and Chief Executive Officer	Pension Equalization Plan		4.75		104,485		—

Steven Berns	Retirement Plan		7.33		125,655		—
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	Pension Equalization Plan		7.33		55,849		—

Chris Elshaw	Retirement Plan		2.00		31,784		—
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	Pension Equalization Plan		0.67		31,013		—

David L. Kennedy	Retirement Plan		7.50		116,634		—
Vice Chairman	Pension Equalization Plan		7.50		399,029		—

Robert K. Kretzman	Retirement Plan		21.42		902,393		—
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer	Pension Equalization Plan Employment Agreement		21.42 24.42		2,774,526 1,713,472		—

(a)

The amounts set forth in the Pension Benefits Table are based on the assumptions set forth in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2012 Form 10-K. These amounts have been calculated based on the normal retirement age of 65 as specified in the Retirement Plan and Pension Equalization Plan. Mr. Kretzman’s employment agreement provides that he is entitled to accrue retirement benefits through his retirement date and that he is entitled to receive a retirement benefit commencing with his retirement at age 60, or any time thereafter, unadjusted for early retirement. The aggregate present value of Mr. Kretzman’s accumulated retirement benefit based on retirement at age 61 and two months, his age on 12/31/2012, calculated under the Retirement Plan, the Pension Equalization Plan and his employment agreement is $887,408, $2,728,455 and $3,231,822, respectively.

The Retirement Plan is intended to be a tax qualified defined benefit plan. The Pension Equalization Plan is a non-qualified and unfunded benefit plan. In May 2009, the Company amended the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan to cease future benefit accruals under such plans after December 31, 2009. Prior to such amendments, benefits under the non-cash balance program of the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan (the “Non-Cash Balance Program”) were a function of service and final average compensation. The Non-Cash Balance Program was designed to provide an employee having 30 years of credited service with an annuity generally equal to 52% of final average compensation less 50% of estimated individual Social Security benefits. Final average compensation is defined as average annual base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) during the five consecutive calendar years in which base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) were highest out of the last 10 years prior to retirement or earlier termination. Participants in the Non-Cash Balance Program are eligible for early retirement upon the later of the date that they reach age 55 or complete 10 years of service. The amount payable upon early retirement is calculated based on the normal retirement benefit calculation under the Non-Cash Balance Program, reduced by ¹/₂% for each month that benefits start before the normal retirement date of age 65 (or 6% for each full year of early retirement). Messrs. Ennis, Elshaw and Kennedy, each of whom joined the Company after the implementation of the Cash Balance Program (as discussed below), did not participate in the Non-Cash Balance Program.

Effective January 1, 2001, Products Corporation amended the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan to provide for a cash balance program under such plans (the “Cash Balance Program”). Prior to ceasing future benefit accruals under such plans after December 31, 2009, under the Cash Balance Program, eligible employees received quarterly pay credits to an individual cash balance bookkeeping account equal to 5% of their base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) for the previous quarter. Interest credits, which commenced June 30, 2001, were and will continue to be allocated quarterly (based on the yield of the 30-year Treasury bill for November of the preceding calendar year).

Messrs. Ennis, Elshaw and Kennedy participated in the Cash Balance Program prior to the cessation of future benefit accruals after December 31, 2009. Employees who as of January 1, 2001 were at least age 45, had 10 or more years of service with the Company and whose age and years of service totaled at least 60, including Mr. Kretzman, were “grandfathered” and continued to participate in the Non-Cash Balance Program under the same retirement formula described in the preceding paragraph, prior to ceasing future benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan after December 31, 2009. All eligible employees had their benefits earned (if any) under the Non-Cash Balance Program “frozen” on December 31, 2000 and began to participate in the Cash Balance Program on January 1, 2001, prior to ceasing future benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan after December 31, 2009. The “frozen” benefits will be payable at normal retirement age and will be reduced if the employee elects early retirement. Mr. Berns’ retirement benefits listed in the table above were all earned during his first period of employment with the Company, which spanned from April 1992 to August 1999, under the Non-Cash Balance Program. Upon his re-employment with the Company in May 2009, he was not eligible for any additional benefit under either the Non-Cash Balance Program or the Cash Balance Program, because (i) he did not complete a full year of re-employment prior to the freezing of the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan as of December 31, 2009, and (ii) under the provisions of the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan, a vested participant would only have become eligible for additional benefits upon completing one year of service from their re-employment date.

The Retirement Plan and Pension Equalization Plan each provide that employees vest in their benefits after they have completed three years of service with the Company or an affiliate of the Company. Each of the Named Executive Officers is fully vested in his respective benefits under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan as of December 31, 2009. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, places certain maximum limitations under ERISA and the Code upon the annual benefit payable under all qualified plans of an employer to any one individual. In addition, the Code limits the annual amount of compensation that can be considered in determining the level of benefits under qualified plans. As noted above, the Pension Equalization Plan is a non-qualified and unfunded benefit plan that was designed to provide for the payment by the Company of the difference, if any, between the amount of such maximum limitations and the annual benefit that would otherwise be payable under the Retirement Plan but for such limitations, up to a combined maximum annual straight life annuity benefit at age 65 under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan of $500,000. Benefits provided under the Pension Equalization Plan are conditioned on the participant’s compliance with his or her non-competition agreement and on the participant not competing with Products Corporation for one year after termination of employment.

Based upon the application of IRS rules and the retirement programs’ respective terms, Messrs. Ennis, Elshaw and Kennedy will be paid out their “frozen” vested accrued benefit under the Cash Balance Program, at termination or retirement, as a lump sum or in the form of a monthly annuity payment, as they elect; Mr. Kretzman will be paid out his accrued benefit under the Non-Cash Balance Program, at termination or retirement, in the form of a monthly annuity payment; and Mr. Berns will be paid out his “frozen” accrued benefit under the Non-Cash Balance Program, at retirement, in the form of a monthly annuity payment.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

Prior to December 31, 2004, employees were able to make contributions to the Company’s Excess Savings Plan, a non-qualified, defined contribution, deferred compensation plan, and the Company matched 50% of those contributions up to 6% of pay contributed. New contributions by employees to the Excess Savings Plan were frozen on December 31, 2004. Mr. Kretzman is the only Named Executive Officer who contributed to the Company’s Excess Savings Plan before it was frozen.

As previously noted, the Company “froze” its U.S. qualified and non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans (namely, the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan) so that no further benefits would accrue thereunder after December 31, 2009. The Company also amended its qualified and non-qualified savings plans effective January 1, 2010 to enable the Company, on a discretionary basis, to make profit-sharing contributions (equal to 5%, 3% and 3% of eligible compensation for 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively) to the qualified plan and, to the extent eligible compensation exceeds IRS limits, to the Excess Savings Plan (i.e., the non-qualified savings plan).

The Excess Savings Plan provides for substantially the same investment choices as are available in the Company’s qualified 401(k) Plan. The Excess Savings Plan does not provide for above-market returns. Payments of participant balances under the Excess Savings Plan commence in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Excess Savings Plan after termination of a participant’s employment and may be paid in either annual installments over a period of no more than 10 years or as a single lump-sum payment, as elected by the participant.

Amounts shown in the table below reflect amounts deferred from compensation and Company matching contributions prior to December 31, 2004, plus discretionary Company contributions made under the discretionary employer profit-sharing provisions of the Excess Savings Plan during 2012, as well as total account balances, inclusive of investment returns, as of December 31, 2012. Mr. Kretzman has waived his eligibility to receive profit sharing contributions, as he has a retirement benefit under his employment agreement.


Name	Executive Contributions in 2012 ($)		Registrant Contributions for 2012 ($)(a)		Aggregate Earnings in 2012 ($)(b)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at 12/31/12 ($)(c)
Alan T. Ennis		—		33,681		16,824		—		132,204
President and Chief Executive Officer

Steven Berns		—		14,002		5,850		—		48,460
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Chris Elshaw		—		26,398		9,249		—		95,620
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

David Kennedy		—		—		1,989		—		21,121
Vice Chairman

Robert K. Kretzman		—		—		9,096		—		74,330
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

(a)	These amounts represent discretionary employer contributions credited under the profit-sharing provisions of the Excess Savings Plan in respect to 2012 (including those credited during January 2013).

(b)

Amounts reported under Aggregate Earnings in 2012 are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table. For Mr. Kretzman, his amount represents the appreciation in market returns on his investments under the Excess Savings Plan which he made prior to December 31, 2004, when the employee contribution feature was frozen. See the “Pension Benefits Table” and the “Summary Compensation Table,” above, for a discussion of the Pension Equalization Plan, a non-qualified, deferred compensation plan.

(c)

These amounts represent actual account balances at year end, and do not reflect the portion of the 2012 discretionary employer contributions credited during 2013, nor the earnings thereon. The Company has contributed funds to a rabbi trust equal to the Excess Savings Plan’s liabilities. For Mr. Kretzman, who waived his eligibility to receive profit sharing contributions, as he has a retirement benefit under his employment agreement, his amount represents amounts deferred from compensation and Company matching contributions prior to December 31, 2004, when the employee contribution feature was frozen, plus market returns.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following Director Compensation table shows all compensation paid by the Company to its Directors in respect of 2012.


Name (a)	Fiscal Year		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(b)		All Other Compensation ($)(c)		Total ($)
Alan S. Bernikow		2012		181,000		25,000		206,000
Paul J. Bohan		2012		162,500		25,000		187,500
Viet D. Dinh(d)		2012		78,267		—		78,267
Meyer Feldberg		2012		172,500		—		172,500
Debra L. Lee		2012		142,000		—		142,000
Tamara Mellon		2012		131,500		—		131,500
Richard J. Santagati		2012		148,000		—		148,000
Kathi P. Seifert		2012		159,500		—		159,500

(a)

See “Summary Compensation Table” regarding compensation paid during the fiscal year to each of Messrs. Ennis and Kennedy in his role as an executive officer. Messrs. Ennis, Kennedy, Perelman and Schwartz did not receive any compensation for their service as Directors for 2012. Ms. Kurzman was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors in February 2013 and thus received no compensation from the Company for Board service during 2012. Ms. Cantor, a new director nominee, also did not serve as a Director of the Company at any time during 2012.

(b)

During 2012, the Company’s Board compensation structure was comprised of the following components: (i) an annual Board retainer of $115,000; (ii) Board and Committee meeting fees of $1,500 per meeting; (iii) an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each Committee chairman; and (iv) an additional annual Audit Committee membership retainer of $10,000.

(c)

The amounts shown under the “All Other Compensation” column reflect fees received by Messrs. Bernikow and Bohan during 2012 as members of the Board of Directors of Products Corporation (the Company’s wholly-owned operating subsidiary). Products Corporation’s non-employee directors (i.e., those Directors who were not receiving compensation as officers or employees of the Company or any of its affiliates) are paid an annual retainer fee of $25,000 per annum and are entitled to a meeting fee of $1,500 for each meeting of Products Corporation’s Board of Directors that they attend. Messrs. Ennis, Kennedy, Perelman and Schwartz also served as members of Products Corporation’s Board of Directors during 2012, but received no fees for such service.

(d)	Mr. Dinh was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors at the Company’s 2012 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting, in June 2012.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2013, the number of shares of each class of the Company’s Voting Capital Stock beneficially owned, and the percent so owned, by (i) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities; (ii) each director of the Company; (iii) the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other Named Executive Officers during 2012; and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company during 2012 as a group. The number of shares owned are those beneficially owned, as determined under the applicable rules of the SEC for the purposes of this Proxy Statement, and such information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares of Voting Capital Stock as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and any shares of Voting Capital Stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any option, warrant or right, through conversion of any security or pursuant to the automatic termination of a power of attorney or revocation of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. Certain of the shares listed as beneficially owned are pursuant to stock options which were all “out-of-the-money” as of such date.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (Class A Common Stock Unless Otherwise Noted)			Percentage of Class(5)
Ronald O. Perelman c/o MacAndrews and Forbes Holdings Inc., 35 E. 62nd St., New York, NY 10065		37,544,640 3,125,000 (Class B Common Stock)	(1) (1)		76.3% (Class A Common Stock) 100% (Class B Common Stock)

Alan S. Bernikow c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		14,000 2,499 (Preferred Stock)	(2) (4)		* *

Steven Berns c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		15,955			*

Paul J. Bohan c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		13,250 22,499 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

Viet D. Dinh c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		0			* *

Chris Elshaw c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		44,407 11,618 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

Alan T. Ennis c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		45,304 23,648 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

Meyer Feldberg c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		13,250 2,499 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

David L. Kennedy c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		116,550 127,001 (Preferred Stock)	(3) (4)		* 1.4% (Preferred Stock)

Cecelia Kurzman c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		0			*

Robert K. Kretzman c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		46,592 49,209 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

Debra L. Lee c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		13,250 2,499 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

Tamara Mellon c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		10,750			*

Richard J. Santagati c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		680 (Preferred Stock)			*

Barry F. Schwartz c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		22,014 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		*

Kathi P. Seifert c/o Revlon, 237 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017		13,250 14,807 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		* *

Wells Fargo & Company 420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA 94104		472,720 (Preferred Stock)	(6)		5.06% (Preferred Stock)

All Directors and Executive Officers, as a Group (16 Persons)		37,891,198 (Class A Common Stock) 3,125,000 (Class B Common Stock) 278,973 (Preferred Stock)	(4)		76.96% (Class A Common Stock) 100% (Class B Common Stock) 3.0% (Preferred Stock)

*	Less than one percent.

(1)

Mr. Perelman beneficially owned, directly and indirectly through MacAndrews & Forbes, as of March 31, 2013, 37,544,640 shares of Class A Common Stock (of which, (a) 25,264,938 shares were beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes; (b) 7,718,092 shares were owned by a holding company, RCH Holdings One Inc. (of which each of Mr. Perelman and The Ronald O. Perelman 2008 Trust owns 50% of the shares); and (c) 4,561,610 shares were beneficially owned by a family member of Mr. Perelman with respect to which shares MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy). Mr. Perelman, through MacAndrews & Forbes, also beneficially owned, as of March 31, 2013, all of the outstanding 3,125,000 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class B Common Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock. Such Common Stock share ownership represented approximately 77% of the Voting Capital Stock as of March 11, 2013. MacAndrews & Forbes has advised the Company that it has pledged shares of Class A Common Stock to secure certain obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes. Additional shares of Revlon, Inc., and shares of common stock of intermediate holding companies between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes, may from time to time be pledged to secure obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes. A default under any of these obligations that are secured by the pledged shares could cause a foreclosure with respect to such shares of Class A Common Stock, Products Corporation’s common stock or stock of intermediate holding companies between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes. A foreclosure upon any such shares of common stock or dispositions of shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock, Products Corporation’s common stock or stock of intermediate holding companies between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes which are beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes could, in a sufficient amount, constitute a “change of control” under the 2011 Credit Agreements, the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement and the indenture governing the 5³/₄% Senior Notes (each as hereinafter defined). A change of control constitutes an event of default under the 2011 Credit Agreements, which would permit Products Corporation’s lenders to accelerate amounts outstanding under such facilities. In addition, holders of the 5³/₄% Senior Notes may require Products Corporation to repurchase their respective notes under those circumstances. Upon a change of control, Products Corporation would also be required, after fulfilling its repayment obligations under the 5³/₄% Senior Notes indenture, to repay in full the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan, provided that Revlon, Inc. at such time has redeemed or is then concurrently redeeming the Preferred Stock.

(2)

Includes 13,250 shares of Class A Common Stock held directly by Mr. Bernikow (representing formerly restricted shares that vested after the closing date of the 2009 Exchange Offer in accordance with the terms of the award agreements and were not eligible to be exchanged in the 2009 Exchange Offer) and 750 shares that Mr. Bernikow may acquire under vested options, all of which options are out-of-the-money.

(3)

Includes 91,550 shares of Class A Common Stock held directly by Mr. Kennedy (representing formerly restricted shares that vested after the closing date of the 2009 Exchange Offer in accordance with the terms of the award agreements, net of shares withheld for taxes, and were not eligible to be exchanged in the 2009 Exchange Offer), 20,000 shares of Class A Common Stock purchased by Mr. Kennedy through his Company 401(k) plan account (which shares were not eligible to be exchanged in the 2009 Exchange Offer), and 5,000 shares that Mr. Kennedy may acquire under vested options, all of which options are out-of-the-money (and expired after the above-referenced date, on April 22, 2013).

(4)

The referenced Executive Officers and Directors, each of whom was a director, officer and/or employee of the Company at the time of the Company’s 2009 Exchange Offer, fully participated in the 2009 Exchange Offer, by exchanging in the 2009 Exchange Offer all of their respective eligible shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock held by them on October 8, 2009 (the closing date of the 2009 Exchange Offer) for a like number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

(5)

In November 2009, affiliates of Fidelity filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC disclosing that they ceased to own any shares of Class A Common Stock. In 2010, Fidelity advised the Company that, as of the April 8, 2010 record date for Revlon, Inc.’s 2010 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting, FMR LLC (singly or together with other affiliates of Fidelity) owned 8,233,526 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding Class A Common Stock

and Preferred Stock, in the aggregate, representing 9.2% of Revlon, Inc.’s issued and outstanding shares of voting capital stock at such date. Subsequently, however, Fidelity filed a Schedule 13F-HR with the SEC on February 14, 2013, indicating that it owned 1,013,000 shares of Class A Common Stock as of December 31, 2012. The Company does not know how many shares of Preferred Stock Fidelity currently owns, and there is no public record of such ownership.

(6)

On February 13, 2013, Wells Fargo & Company filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing that it owned 472,720 shares of Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock, as of December 31, 2012, representing approximately 5.06% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Preferred Stock. As Revlon, Inc.’s Series A Preferred Stock is not registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, ownership of such shares does not require any such Schedule 13G filing obligation.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2012, with respect to all equity compensation plans of the Company previously approved and not previously approved by its stockholders: (i) the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights; (ii) the weighted-average exercise price of such outstanding options, warrants and rights; and (iii) the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under such equity compensation plans, excluding securities reflected in column (a).


	(a)			(b)		(c)
Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Previously Approved by Stockholders:
Stock Plan		8,105	(1)	$	29.91		4,628,351	(2)
Not Previously Approved by Stockholders:		—			—		—

(1)

Represents stock options issued and outstanding under the Stock Plan; note, as of December 31, 2012, there were no unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units issued and outstanding under the Stock Plan. In all cases, stock option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2012 were “out-of-the-money,” in that in each case they had exercise prices that were above the $14.50 per share NYSE closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2012 and therefore had no realizable monetary value on such date.

(2)	As of December 31, 2012, all of these shares remained available for issuance as awards of any kind under the Stock Plan, including awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

As of December 31, 2012, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Voting Capital Stock having approximately 77% of the combined voting power of such outstanding shares. As a result, MacAndrews & Forbes is able to elect Revlon, Inc.’s entire Board of Directors and control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.’s stockholders. MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, Chairman of Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors.

Transfer Agreements

In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with Revlon Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and formerly a Delaware corporation known as Revlon Holdings Inc. (“Revlon Holdings”), and which is an affiliate and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of

MacAndrews & Forbes, and certain of Revlon Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiaries. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation also entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Revlon Holdings. Pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992, Revlon Holdings transferred certain assets to Products Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all of the liabilities of Revlon Holdings, other than certain specifically excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the “Excluded Liabilities”). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator-assisted distribution channels considered not integral to the Company’s business and that historically had not been profitable and certain other assets and liabilities were retained by Revlon Holdings. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Revlon Holdings against losses arising from the liabilities assumed by Products Corporation. The amounts reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation for the Excluded Liabilities was $0.3 million for 2012.

Reimbursement Agreements

Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (“MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings”) have entered into reimbursement agreements (the “Reimbursement Agreements”) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. is obligated to provide (directly or through its affiliates) certain professional and administrative services, including without limitation employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including without limitation Products Corporation, and to purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance, legal, accounting and air transportation services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent requested by Products Corporation, and (ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain professional and administrative services, including without limitation employees, to MacAndrews & Forbes and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance, legal and accounting services, on behalf of MacAndrews & Forbes to the extent requested by MacAndrews & Forbes, provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause an unreasonable burden to MacAndrews & Forbes or Products Corporation, as the case may be.

The Company reimburses MacAndrews & Forbes for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided by MacAndrews & Forbes to the Company and its subsidiaries and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews & Forbes reimburses Products Corporation for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided by Products Corporation to MacAndrews & Forbes and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Products Corporation in connection with the purchase or provision of such services. Each of the Company, on the one hand, and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., on the other, has agreed to indemnify the other party for losses arising out of the services provided by it under the Reimbursement Agreements, other than losses resulting from its willful misconduct or gross negligence.

The Reimbursement Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days’ notice. The Company does not intend to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs would be at least as favorable to the Company as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

The Company participates in MacAndrews & Forbes’ directors’ and officers’ liability insurance program (the “D&O Insurance Program”), as well as its other insurance coverages, such as property damage, business interruption, liability and other coverages, which cover the Company as well as MacAndrews & Forbes and its subsidiaries. The limits of coverage for certain of the policies are available on an aggregate basis for losses to any or all of the participating companies and their respective directors and officers. The Company reimburses MacAndrews & Forbes from time to time for their allocable portion of the premiums for such coverage or the Company pays the insurers directly, which premiums the Company believes are more favorable than the premiums the Company would pay were it to secure stand-alone coverage. Any amounts paid by the Company directly to MacAndrews & Forbes in respect of premiums are included in the amounts paid under the Reimbursement Agreements.

The net activity related to services provided and/or purchased under the Reimbursement Agreements during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $3.3 million, which primarily includes $18.0 million of costs incurred by the Company that were reimbursed by MacAndrews & Forbes from proceeds received from the D&O Insurance Program, partially offset by a $14.6 million partial pre-payment made by the Company to MacAndrews & Forbes during the first quarter of 2012 for premiums related to the Company’s allocable portion of the 5-year renewal of the D&O Insurance Program (for the period from January 31, 2012 through January 31, 2017).

Tax Sharing Agreements

As a result of a debt-for-equity exchange transaction completed in March 2004 (the “2004 Revlon Exchange Transactions”), as of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the affiliated group of which MacAndrews & Forbes was the common parent (the “MacAndrews & Forbes Group”) for federal income tax purposes.

Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the “MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement”) for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 through and including March 25, 2004, during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products Corporation was a member of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income and loss were included in such group’s consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation remain liable under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, for all such taxable periods through and including March 25, 2004 for amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise, equal to the taxes that Revlon, Inc. or Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if it were to have filed separate federal, state or local income tax returns for such periods.

Following the closing of the 2004 Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income and loss are included in such group’s consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a tax sharing agreement (the “Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement”) pursuant to which Products Corporation is required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities.

There were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes from Revlon, Inc. to Revlon Holdings pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in 2012 with respect to periods covered by the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement, and the Company expects that there will not be any such payments in 2013. During 2012, there was $0.3 million in federal tax payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement with respect to 2011 and $1.8 million with respect to 2012. The Company expects that there will be $0.1 million in federal tax payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement during 2013 with respect to 2012.

Pursuant to the asset transfer agreement referred to above, Products Corporation assumed all tax liabilities of Revlon Holdings other than (i) certain income tax liabilities arising prior to January 1, 1992 to the extent such liabilities exceeded the reserves on Revlon Holdings’ books as of January 1, 1992 or were not of the nature reserved for and (ii) other tax liabilities to the extent such liabilities are related to the business and assets retained by Revlon Holdings.

Registration Rights Agreement

Prior to the consummation of Revlon, Inc.’s initial public equity offering in February 1996, Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Worldwide Corporation (which subsequently merged into REV Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (formerly a Delaware corporation) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes (“REV Holdings”), the then direct parent of Revlon, Inc.) entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), and in February 2003, MacAndrews & Forbes executed a joinder agreement to the Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which REV Holdings, MacAndrews & Forbes and certain transferees of Revlon, Inc.’s Common Stock held by REV Holdings (the “Holders”) have the right to require Revlon, Inc. to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, all or part of the Class A Common Stock owned by such Holders, including, without limitation, shares of Class A Common Stock purchased by MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with the $50.0 million equity rights offering consummated by Revlon, Inc. in 2003 and shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Revlon, Inc.’s Class B Common Stock owned by such Holders (a “Demand Registration”). In connection with the closing of the 2004 Revlon Exchange Transactions and pursuant to an Investment Agreement entered into in connection with such transactions (the “2004 Investment Agreement”), MacAndrews & Forbes executed a joinder agreement that provided that MacAndrews & Forbes would also be a Holder under the Registration Rights Agreement and that all shares acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement are deemed to be registrable securities under the Registration Rights Agreement. This included all of the shares of Class A Common Stock acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with Revlon, Inc.’s $110 million rights offering of shares of its Class A Common Stock and related private placement to MacAndrews & Forbes, which was consummated in March 2006, and the Company’s $100 million rights offering of shares of its Class A Common Stock and related private placement to MacAndrews & Forbes, which was consummated in January 2007.

Revlon, Inc. may postpone giving effect to a Demand Registration for a period of up to 30 days if Revlon, Inc. believes such registration might have a material adverse effect on any plan or proposal by Revlon, Inc. with respect to any financing, acquisition, recapitalization, reorganization or other material transaction, or if Revlon, Inc. is in possession of material non-public information that, if publicly disclosed, could result in a material disruption of a major corporate development or transaction then pending or in progress or could result in other material adverse consequences to Revlon, Inc. In addition, the Holders have the right to participate in registrations by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock (a “Piggyback Registration”). The Holders will pay all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with any Demand Registration. Revlon, Inc. will pay any expenses incurred in connection with a Piggyback Registration, except for underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses attributable to the shares of Class A Common Stock sold by such Holders.

Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan

Upon consummation of the 2009 Exchange Offer in October 2009, MacAndrews & Forbes contributed to Revlon, Inc. $48.6 million of the $107 million aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Term Loan (the “Senior Subordinated Term Loan;” the agreement in respect to such loan is referred to as the “Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement”) made in January 2008 by MacAndrews & Forbes to Products Corporation (the “Contributed Loan”), representing $5.21 of outstanding principal amount for each of the 9,336,905 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock exchanged in the 2009 Exchange Offer, and Revlon, Inc. issued to MacAndrews & Forbes 9,336,905 shares of Class A Common Stock at a ratio of one share of Class A Common Stock for each $5.21 of outstanding principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Term Loan contributed to Revlon, Inc. Upon consummation of the 2009 Exchange Offer, the terms of the Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement were amended to (i) extend the maturity date of the Contributed Loan from August 2010 to October 8, 2013, and to change the annual interest rate on the Contributed Loan from 11% to 12.75%; and (ii) extend the maturity date of the $58.4 million principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Loan which, at December 31, 2011, remained owing from Products Corporation to MacAndrews & Forbes (the “Non-Contributed Loan”) from August 2010 to October 8, 2014 and to change the annual interest rate on the Non-Contributed Loan from 11% to 12%.

On April 30, 2012, MacAndrews & Forbes exercised its right to assign its interest in the Non-Contributed Loan. In connection with such assignment, Products Corporation entered into an Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes and a related Administrative Letter was entered into with Citibank, N.A. and MacAndrews & Forbes, to among other things:

(i)

modify the interest rate on the Non-Contributed Loan from its prior 12% fixed rate to a floating rate of LIBOR plus 7%, with a 1.5% LIBOR floor, resulting in an interest rate of approximately 8.5% per annum through December 31, 2012 (or a 3.5% reduction per annum) upon the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement. Interest under the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement is payable quarterly in arrears in cash;

(ii)

insert prepayment premiums such that Products Corporation may optionally prepay the Non-Contributed Loan (i) through October 31, 2013 with a prepayment premium based on a formula designed to provide the assignees of the Non-Contributed Loan with the present value, using a discount rate of 75 basis points over U.S. Treasuries, of the principal, premium and interest that would have accrued on the Non-Contributed Loan from any such prepayment date through October 31, 2013 (provided that, pursuant to the loan’s terms (both before and after giving effect to these amendments), no portion of the principal amount of the Non-Contributed Loan may be repaid prior to its October 8, 2014 maturity date unless and until all shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Preferred Stock have been or are being concurrently redeemed and all payments due thereon are paid in full or are concurrently being paid in full), (ii) from November 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014 with a 2% prepayment premium on the aggregate principal amount of the Non-Contributed Loan being prepaid, and (iii) from May 1, 2014 through maturity on October 8, 2014 with no prepayment premium; and

(iii)

designate Citibank, N.A. as the administrative agent for the Non-Contributed Loan.

Concurrent with the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes assigned its entire interest in the Non-Contributed Loan to several third parties.

Pursuant to the terms of the Contributed Loan, Products Corporation may, at its option, prepay such loan, in whole or in part (together with accrued and unpaid interest), at any time prior to its maturity date without premium or penalty, provided that prior to such loan’s maturity date all shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Preferred Stock have been or are being concurrently redeemed and all payments due thereon are paid in full or are concurrently being paid in full.

The Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan is an unsecured obligation of Products Corporation and is subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt of Products Corporation, currently including indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2011 Credit Agreements and its 5³/₄% Senior Notes. The Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan has the right to payment equal in right of payment with any present and future senior subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation.

The Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement contains covenants (other than the subordination provisions discussed above) that limit the ability of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase stock, engage in certain asset sales, make certain types of investments and other restricted payments, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, restrict dividends or payments from subsidiaries and create liens on their assets. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions.

The Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement includes a cross acceleration provision which provides that it shall be an event of default under such agreement if any debt (as defined in such agreement) of Products Corporation or any of its significant subsidiaries (as defined in such agreement) is not paid within any applicable grace period after final maturity or is accelerated by the holders of such debt because

of a default and the total principal amount of the portion of such debt that is unpaid or accelerated exceeds $25.0 million and such default continues for 10 days after notice from the holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan (provided that if Revlon, Inc. or Products Corporation held such majority, notice would be required from the holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan not held by Revlon, Inc. or Products Corporation at the time of any such decision). If any such event of default occurs, such requisite holders of the Non-Contributed and Contributed Loans may declare the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan to be due and payable immediately.

The Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement also contains other customary events of default for loan agreements of such type, including, subject to applicable grace periods, nonpayment of any principal or interest when due under such agreement, non-compliance with any of the material covenants in such agreement, any representation or warranty being incorrect, false or misleading in any material respect, or the occurrence of certain bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings by or against Products Corporation or any of its significant subsidiaries.

Upon any change of control (as defined in the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement), Products Corporation is required to repay the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan in full, provided that prior to such loan’s respective maturity dates all shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Preferred Stock have been or are being concurrently redeemed and all payments due thereon are paid in full or are concurrently being paid in full, after fulfilling an offer to repay Products Corporation’s 5³/₄% Senior Secured Notes and to the extent permitted by Products Corporation’s 2011 Credit Agreements.

In connection with the closing of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into a letter agreement in January 2008 pursuant to which Revlon, Inc. agreed that if Revlon, Inc. conducts any equity offering before full payment of the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan, and, if MacAndrews & Forbes and/or its affiliates elects to participate in any such offering, MacAndrews & Forbes and/or its affiliates may pay for any shares it acquires in such offering either in cash or by tendering debt valued at its face amount under the Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Term Loan, if any, including any accrued but unpaid interest, on a dollar for dollar basis, or in any combination of cash and such debt. Revlon, Inc. is under no obligation to conduct an equity offering and MacAndrews & Forbes and its affiliates are under no obligation to subscribe for shares should Revlon elect to conduct an equity offering.

Contribution and Stockholder Agreement

In connection with consummating the 2009 Exchange Offer, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into a Contribution and Stockholder Agreement (as amended, the “Contribution and Stockholder Agreement”), pursuant to which through October 8, 2013:

•

During any period in which Revlon, Inc. may not be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, Revlon, Inc. will file or furnish, as appropriate, with the SEC on a voluntary basis all periodic and other reports that are required of a company that is subject to such reporting requirements;

•

Revlon, Inc. will maintain a majority of independent directors on its Board of Directors, each of whom meets the “independence” criteria as set forth in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, as it currently does; and

•

Revlon, Inc. will not engage in any transaction with any affiliate, other than Revlon, Inc.’s subsidiaries, or with any legal or beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of Revlon, Inc.’s voting stock, unless, in each case subject to certain exceptions (i) any such transaction or series of related transactions involving aggregate payments or other consideration in excess of $5 million has been approved by all of Revlon, Inc.’s independent directors and (ii) any such transaction or series of related transactions

involving aggregate payments or other consideration in excess of $20 million has been determined, in the written opinion of a nationally recognized investment banking firm, to be fair, from a financial point of view, to Revlon, Inc., and in each case subject to certain exceptions.

MacAndrews & Forbes agreed that it will not complete certain short-form mergers under Section 253 of the DGCL unless either (i) such transaction has been approved in advance by a majority of the independent directors of Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as satisfying certain other conditions; or (ii) the short-form merger is preceded by a “qualifying tender offer” (as defined in the Contribution and Stockholder Agreement) for the shares of Class A Common Stock held by persons other than MacAndrews & Forbes, subject to certain other conditions. In any such merger, the holders of Preferred Stock would retain their shares of Preferred Stock, or receive shares of preferred stock in the surviving corporation of such merger with terms identical to, or no less favorable than, the terms of the Preferred Stock (with, for the avoidance of doubt, the same terms as though issued on the date of original issuance of the Preferred Stock).

Fidelity Stockholders’ Agreement

In connection with the 2004 Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Co. (“Fidelity”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC (“FMR”), entered into a stockholders agreement (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, Revlon, Inc. (i) agreed to continue to maintain a majority of independent directors (as defined by NYSE listing standards) on its Board of Directors, as it currently does; (ii) established and maintains the Governance Committee of its Board of Directors; and (iii) agreed to certain restrictions with respect to its conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions with any of its affiliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any affiliates of such holders (in each case, other than its subsidiaries). This Stockholders’ Agreement terminates, by its terms, when Fidelity ceases to be the beneficial holder of at least 5% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock. In November 2009, affiliates of Fidelity filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC disclosing that they ceased to own any shares of Class A Common Stock. In 2010, Fidelity advised the Company that, as of the April 8, 2010 record date for Revlon, Inc.’s 2010 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting, FMR (singly or together with other affiliates of Fidelity) owned 8,233,526 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding Class A Common Stock and Preferred Stock, in the aggregate, representing 9.2% of Revlon, Inc.’s issued and outstanding shares of voting capital stock at such date. Subsequently, however, Fidelity filed a Schedule 13F-HR with the SEC on February 14, 2013, indicating that it owned 1,013,000 shares of Class A Common Stock as of December 31, 2012. The Company does not know how many shares of Preferred Stock Fidelity currently owns, and there is no public record of such ownership.

Other

In the second and third quarters of 2012, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into settlement agreements, including without limitation a stipulation and settlement agreement with Fidelity, in connection with the previously disclosed litigation actions related to the 2009 Exchange Offer that would result, if the settlements are approved by the applicable courts, in total cash payments of approximately $36.9 million to settle all actions and related claims by Revlon, Inc.’s stockholders, including Fidelity, of which $23.5 million have been paid from insurance proceeds. As previously disclosed, as part of the settlement, Fidelity agreed, among other things, to accept a cash payment from Revlon, Inc., Revlon, Inc.’s then directors and MacAndrews & Forbes (collectively, the “Defendants”) of $22.5 million, which amount was paid from insurance proceeds in July 2012, in exchange for Fidelity’s opting out with respect to the 6,933,526 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock that Fidelity exchanged in the 2009 Exchange Offer of any purported class action related to the 2009 Exchange Offer and Fidelity’s release of all related potential claims. The Defendants also agreed with Fidelity that, in the event a settlement is reached with the purported class action plaintiffs, or an award of damages is issued following a trial in any of the actions, and that settlement amount or damage award exceeds the settlement amounts on a per share basis received by Fidelity, Fidelity would receive additional consideration subject to certain parameters.

There can be no assurance as to the amount, if any, of additional insurance proceeds that Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes may receive in connection with the resolution of these actions, including the Fidelity settlement. In any event, at least $5 million of future payments relating to these matters, including expenses, will not be covered by insurance. Therefore, the Company recorded a cumulative charge of $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 which represents Revlon, Inc.’s allocable portion of the total settlement payments not currently covered by insurance.

Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the “Edison Lease”), Revlon Holdings leased to Products Corporation the Edison, NJ research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual rent of $1.4 million and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation which, together with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 million per year. In August 1998, Revlon Holdings sold the Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed substantially all liability for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with such sale Products Corporation terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation through September 1, 2013 (the original term of the new lease) to the extent that rent under the new lease exceeds the rent that would have been payable under the terminated Edison Lease had it not been terminated. Effective October 2010, Products Corporation entered into a renewal of the lease with the owner through September 2025. The Revlon Holdings indemnification obligation will terminate on September 1, 2013. The net amount reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation with respect to the Edison facility for 2012 was $0.1 million.

Certain of Products Corporation’s debt obligations, including its amended and restated bank term loan agreement and its multi-currency revolving credit agreement (the “2011 Credit Agreements”) and its 9³/₄% Senior Secured Notes (which notes, as previously disclosed, were completely refinanced by Products Corporation in February 2013 with its unsecured 5³/₄% Senior Notes due 2021), have been, and may in the future be, supported by, among other things, guarantees from the Company and, subject to certain limited exceptions, all of the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations under such guarantees are and were secured by, among other things, the capital stock of Products Corporation and, subject to certain limited exceptions, the capital stock of all of Products Corporation’s domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the capital stock of Products Corporation’s and its domestic subsidiaries’ first-tier foreign subsidiaries.

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Revlon, Inc. Related Party Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) serves as a set of guidelines for the approval of interested transactions with related parties. Under the Policy, related party transactions are subject to the review, approval and/or ratification of the Governance Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors. The Policy also pre-approves a series of related party transactions including, among others: (i) certain employment relationships and related compensatory arrangements with executive officers, which are either approved by the Compensation Committee or disclosed in the Company’s annual proxy statement, if so required; (ii) transactions related to the ownership of the Company’s common stock where all stockholders are receiving the same or substantially the same pro rata benefit; (iii) competitively-bid transactions; (iv) transactions permitted under Products Corporation’s indentures, credit agreements and other debt instruments (copies of each of which are on file with the SEC); and (v) transactions described in the Company’s proxy statements or other SEC reports filed with or furnished to the SEC on or before the adoption of the Policy in March 2007. The Policy also delegates to the Chair of the Governance Committee the authority to approve certain related party transactions.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICER CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has a written Code of Business Conduct (the “Code of Business Conduct”) that includes a code of ethics (the “Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics”) that applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers, including the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Controller and persons

performing similar functions (collectively, the “Senior Financial Officers”). Printable copies of the Code of Business Conduct and the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics are available at www.revloninc.com under the heading Investor Relations (Corporate Governance). If the Company changes the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics in any material respect or waives any provision of the Code of Business Conduct for its executive officers or Directors, including waivers of the Senior Financial Officer Code of Ethics for any of its Senior Financial Officers, the Company expects to provide the public with notice of any such change or waiver by publishing an appropriate description of such event on its corporate website, www.revloninc.com, or by other appropriate means as required or permitted under applicable rules of the SEC. The Company does not currently expect to make any such waivers.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

The Company’s executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders may be required under the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the NYSE and the SEC. The Company makes such SEC filings available on its corporate website, www.revloninc.com, under the heading Investor Relations (SEC Filings). Copies of these reports also must be furnished to the Company by such filers.

Based solely upon a review of copies of such reports furnished to the Company through the date hereof and written representations as to transactions consummated by the Company’s executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders during the year, if any, the Company believes that all Section 16 filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders were complied with during 2012.

PROPOSAL NO. 2 — RATIFICATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE’S SELECTION OF KPMG LLP

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected, subject to ratification by the Company’s stockholders, KPMG LLP to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 10A of the Exchange Act require that the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the audit work of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Ratification by the stockholders of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP is not required by law, the Company’s By-laws or otherwise. However, the Board of Directors is submitting the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP for stockholder ratification to ascertain stockholders’ views on the matter.

KPMG LLP has audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its predecessors for more than the past five consecutive years. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the 2013 Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

The Audit Committee reviews audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG LLP, as well as the fees charged by KPMG LLP for such services. In its review of non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee received and discussed with KPMG LLP their annual written report on KPMG LLP’s independence from the Company and its management, as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee has satisfied itself that KPMG LLP’s provision of audit and non-audit services to the Company is compatible with KPMG LLP’s independence. Additional information concerning the Audit Committee and its activities with KPMG LLP can be found in the following sections of this Proxy Statement: “Board of Directors and its Committees” and “Audit Committee Report.” Information regarding the aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for services rendered to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 can be found below under “Audit Fees.”

Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation (Proposal No. 2)

The ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of votes of Voting Capital Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting, voting as a single class. With respect to Proposal No. 2, all proxies properly submitted to the Company, unless such proxies are revoked prior to their being voted on, will be voted in accordance with the instructions given by the person submitting such proxy or, in the absence of such instructions, will be voted FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. In determining whether Proposal No. 2 has received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal No. 2. Brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on Proposal No. 2 (ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of its independent registered public accounting firm for 2013) absent instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares, as this is a “routine” proposal. MacAndrews & Forbes has informed the Company that it will vote FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. Accordingly, the affirmative vote of MacAndrews & Forbes is sufficient, without the concurring vote of any other stockholder of the Company, to approve and adopt Proposal No. 2.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013.

AUDIT FEES

The Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. maintains its Audit Committee in accordance with applicable SEC rules and the NYSE’s listing standards. In accordance with its charter, a printable and current copy of which is available at www.revloninc.com under the heading Investor Relations (Corporate Governance), the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the audit work of Revlon, Inc.’s independent auditors for the purpose of preparing and issuing its audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for Revlon, Inc. The independent auditors, KPMG LLP, report directly to the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee is directly responsible for, among other things, reviewing in advance, and granting any appropriate pre-approvals of, (a) all auditing services to be provided by the independent auditor and (b) all non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor (as permitted by the Exchange Act), and in connection therewith to approve all fees and other terms of engagement, as required by the applicable rules of the Exchange Act and subject to the exemptions provided for in such rules. The Audit Committee has an Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for pre-approving all permissible audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee also has the authority to approve services to be provided by KPMG LLP at its meetings and by unanimous written consents.

For each year since 2005, the Audit Committee has approved an Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy. During 2012, an electronic printable copy of the 2012 Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy was available at www.revloninc.com under the heading Investor Relations (Corporate Governance). A copy of the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy in effect for 2013 is attached as Annex B and an electronic printable copy of such policy is currently available at www.revloninc.com under the heading Investor Relations (Corporate Governance).

The aggregate fees billed for professional services by KPMG LLP in 2012 and 2011 for these various services for Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation in the aggregate were (in millions):


Types of Fees	2012		2011
Audit Fees	$	3.9	$	3.8
Audit-Related Fees		0.2		0.2
Tax Fees		0.2		0.2
All Other Fees		—		—

Total Fees	$	4.3	$	4.2

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC definitions and rules, (a) “audit fees” are fees the Company paid KPMG LLP for professional services rendered for (i) the audit of Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s annual financial statements; (ii) the audit of Revlon, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) the review of financial statements included in Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided by the auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; (b) “audit-related fees” are fees billed by KPMG LLP for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the auditor, including services performed by KPMG LLP related to employee benefit plan audits and certain transactions, as well as attestation services not required by statute or regulation; (c) “tax fees” are fees for permissible tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning; and (d) “all other fees” are fees billed by KPMG LLP to the Company for any permissible services not included in the first three categories.

All of the services performed by KPMG LLP for the Company during 2012 and 2011 were either expressly pre-approved by the Audit Committee or were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, and the Audit Committee was provided with regular updates as to the nature of such services and fees paid for such services.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder proposals intended for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must be received by the Company’s Secretary, at Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, attention: Michael T. Sheehan, no later than December 26, 2013 (provided, however, if the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year’s meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials). The Company’s By-laws require that proposals of stockholders made outside of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (i.e., proposals that are not to be included in the proxy statement, but to be otherwise considered at the annual stockholders’ meeting) must comply with the requirements of Article II, Section 3 of the Company’s By-laws and must be received by the Company’s Secretary by no earlier than March 8, 2014 and by no later than April 7, 2014 (provided, however, that if the 2014 annual stockholders’ meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after the 1-year anniversary of the 2013 Annual Meeting date, the stockholder’s notice in order to be timely must be received by the Company’s Secretary not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the 2014 annual stockholders’ meeting is mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the 2014 annual stockholders’ meeting is made).

VOTING THROUGH THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE

Our stockholders voting through the Internet or telephone should understand that there may be costs associated with such voting methods, such as usage charges from Internet access providers or telephone companies, which must be borne by the stockholder. To vote by telephone if you are a stockholder of record of our Voting Capital Stock as of the Record Date, call toll free 1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message. To vote by telephone if you are a beneficial owner of our Voting Capital

Stock as of the Record Date (i.e., your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee), call the toll free number listed on your voting instruction form or follow the instructions provided by your broker. To vote through the Internet, log on to the Internet and go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the steps on the secure website. In either case, have your Control Number(s) listed on your Internet Notice or proxy available for voting.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Company will provide shareholders with a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC on February 13, 2013, including financial statements and financial statement schedules, without charge, upon written request to the Company’s Secretary, at Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, attention: Michael T. Sheehan (or via email to michael.sheehan@revlon.com). In order to ensure timely delivery of such documents prior to the 2013 Annual Meeting, any request should be sent to the Company promptly.

For your convenience, please note that current electronic printable copies of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well as a copy of our Internet Notice and this Proxy Statement, are available on the Company’s website at www.revloninc.com under the heading SEC Filings, as well as the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov through the Filings and Forms (EDGAR) pages. In addition, electronic printable copies of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence, Code of Business Conduct, Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and the current charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance Committee are available at www.revloninc.com under the heading Corporate Governance. Any person wishing to receive an electronic copy of Revlon’s 2012 Form 10-K, without charge, may send an email making such a request and including a return email address to michael.sheehan@revlon.com (note that the Company’s ability to respond may be subject to file size limitations imposed by Internet service providers and e-mail services).

OTHER BUSINESS

Management does not intend to present any other items of business and is not aware of any matters other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement that will be presented for action at the 2013 Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the 2013 Annual Meeting, the persons designated by the Company as proxies may vote the shares of Voting Capital Stock that they represent in their discretion.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Michael T. Sheehan

Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and

Secretary

New York, New York

April 25, 2013

Annex A

2012 Comparison Group

Towers Watson U.S. General Industry Executive Database — Total Sample*


3M	Boehringer Ingelheim	Curtiss-Wright(1)
A.O. Smith	Boeing	CVS Caremark
Abbott Laboratories	Booz Allen Hamilton	Daiichi Sankyo
Accenture	BorgWarner	Daimler Trucks North America
ACH Food	Boston Scientific	Danaher
Acxiom	Brady	Darden Restaurants
Adecco	Bristol-Myers Squibb	Dean Foods
Aerojet	Brunswick	Deckers Outdoor(1)
Agilent Technologies	Bunge	Dell
Agrium	Burlington Northern Santa Fe	Delta Air Lines
Air Liquide	Bush Brothers	Deluxe(1)
Air Products and Chemicals	CA, Inc.	Dentsply(1)
Alcatel-Lucent	Cardinal Health	Dex One(1)
Alcoa	CareFusion	DIRECTV Group
Allergan	Cargill	Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group(1)
AMC Entertainment	Carlson	Dollar Tree
American Crystal Sugar	Carmeuse North America Group	Domtar
American Sugar Refining	Carnival	Donaldson(1)
Americas Styrenics	Carpenter Technology	Dow Corning
AmerisourceBergen	Catalent Pharma Solutions	DuPont
AMETEK	Catalyst Health Solutions	E.W. Scripps
Amgen	Caterpillar	Eastman Chemical
AMSTED Industries	Celanese Americas	Eaton
Anixter International	Celestica	eBay
APL	Century Aluminum(1)	Ecolab
Appleton Papers	CEVA Logistics	Eisai, Inc.
ARAMARK	CGI Technologies & Solutions	Eli Lilly
Arby’s Restaurant Group	CH2M Hill	EMC
Archer Daniels Midland	Chemtura(1)	Emerson Electric
Arctic Cat	Chiquita Brands(1)	EnCana Oil & Gas USA
Aricent Group	CHS	Endo Health Solutions(1)
Arkema	Cintas	EnPro Industries(1)
Armstrong World Industries	Cisco Systems	Equifax(1)
Arrow Electronics	Clear Channel Communications	Equity Office Properties(1)
Ashland	Cliffs Natural Resources	Ericsson
AstraZeneca	Cloud Peak Energy(1)	ESRI
AT&T	Coach	Essilor of America
Atos IT Solutions and Services	Coca-Cola	Estee Lauder
Automatic Data Processing	Coca-Cola Enterprises	Esterline Technologies(1)
Avaya	Coinstar(1)	Euro-Pro Operating
Avis Budget Group	Colgate-Palmolive	Exelis
BAE Systems	Columbia Sportswear(1)	Expedia(1)
Ball	Comcast	Experian Americas
Barnes Group	Compass Group	Express Scripts
BASF	ConAgra Foods	Exterran(1)
Baxter International	Continental Automotive Systems	Federal-Mogul
Bayer AG	ConvaTec(1)	Fidessa Group
Bayer Business & Technology Services	Convergys(1)	Fluor
Bayer CropScience	Cooper Industries	Ford
Bayer HealthCare	Corning	Forest Laboratories
BD — Becton Dickinson	Covance(1)	Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold
Beam	Covidien	GAF Materials
Bechtel Systems & Infrastructure Inc.	Crown Castle(1)	Gap
Best Buy	CSC	Gates
Big Lots	CSX	GATX(1)
Bob Evans Farms	Cummins	Gavilon

A-1


GenCorp(1)	Kaman Industrial Technologies(1)	NBTY(1)
General Atomics(1)	Kansas City Southern(1)	Neoris USA
General Dynamics	Kao Brands	Nestle USA
General Mills	KB Home(1)	NeuStar
General Motors	KBR	Newmont Mining
Gilead Sciences	Kellogg	NewPage
GlaxoSmithKline	Kelly Services	Nissan North America
Globecomm Systems	Kennametal(1)	Nokia
Goodrich	Keystone Foods(1)	Norfolk Southern
Graco(1)	Kimberly-Clark	Northrop Grumman
Green Mountain(1)	Kimco Realty(1)	Novartis Consumer Health
GROWMARK	Kinross Gold	Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals
GTECH	Koch Industries	Novus International(1)
H.B. Fuller(1)	Kohler	Nu Skin Enterprises(1)
Hanesbrands	Kyocera Corporation	Nypro(1)
Hanger Orthopedic Group(1)	L-3 Communications	Occidental Petroleum
Harland Clarke(1)	Land O’Lakes	Office Depot
Harman International Industries	Leggett and Platt	Omnicare
Harsco(1)	Lend Lease	OMNOVA Solutions(1)
Hasbro	Lenovo	OSI Restaurant Partners
Herman Miller(1)	Leprino Foods(1)	Owens Corning
Hershey	Level 3 Communications	Pall Corporation(1)
Hertz	Lexmark International	Parker Hannifin
Hewlett-Packard	Life Technologies	Parsons(1)
Hexcel(1)	LifeCell	PCL Constructors
Hilton Worldwide	Limited	Performance Food Group
Hitachi Data Systems	Lincoln Electric(1)	Pfizer
HNI(1)	L’Oreal	Pitney Bowes
HNTB(1)	Lorillard Tobacco	Plexus(1)
Hoffmann-La Roche	LSG Sky Chefs	Polaris Industries(1)
Honeywell	LyondellBasell	Polymer Group(1)
Hormel Foods	Magellan Midstream Partners(1)	PolyOne(1)
Hostess Brands(1)	Makino(1)	Potash
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing(1)	Manitowoc	PPG Industries
Hovnanian Enterprises(1)	Marriott International	Praxair
HTC Corporation	Martin Marietta Materials(1)	Pulte Homes
Hunt Consolidated	Mary Kay(1)	Purdue Pharma(1)
Hutchinson Technology	Mattel	Quest Diagnostics
IBM	Matthews International(1)	Quintiles(1)
IDEXX Laboratories(1)	McDonald’s	R.R. Donnelley
Illinois Tool Works	McGraw-Hill	Ralcorp Holdings
Ingersoll-Rand	MeadWestvaco	Rayonier(1)
Intel	Medicines Company	Regency Centers
Intercontinental Hotels(1)	Medtronic	Research in Motion
International Data Group(1)	Merck & Co	Revlon(1)
International Flavors & Fragrances(1)	Meredith(1)	Ricardo
International Game Technology(1)	Micron Technology	Rio Tinto
International Paper	Microsoft	Roche Diagnostics
ION Geophysical	Milacron(1)	Rockwell Automation
Irvine Company(1)	MillerCoors	Rockwell Collins
Itron(1)	Mohegan Sun Casino(1)	Rohm Semiconductor USA
ITT — Corporate(1)	Molson Coors Brewing	Rolls-Royce North America
J.M. Smucker	Monsanto	S.C. Johnson & Son
J.R. Simplot	Mosaic	Sabre(1)
Jabil Circuit	Motorola Mobility	SAIC
Jack-in-the-Box(1)	Motorola Solutions	Sanofi-Aventis
Jacobs Engineering	Murphy Oil	SAS Institute(1)
JetBlue Airways	Mylan	SCA Americas
Johns-Manville	Nash-Finch	Schlumberger
Johnson & Johnson	Navigant Consulting	Schreiber Foods
Johnson Controls	Navistar International	Schwan’s(1)

A-2


Scientific Research Corporation	Sysco	United Rentals(1)
Scotts Miracle-Gro(1)	Target	United States Cellular
Seagate Technology	Taubman Centers	United Technologies
Sealed Air	TE Connectivity Tech Data	UPS
ServiceMaster Company(1)	TeleTech Holdings(1)	URS
ShawCor(1)	Teradata(1)	Valero Energy
Sherwin-Williams	Terex	Valmont Industries(1)
Shire Pharmaceuticals	Textron	Verizon
Siemens AG	Thermo Fisher Scientific	Vertex Pharmaceuticals(1)
Sigma-Aldrich(1)	Thomson Reuters	Viacom
Snap-on(1)	Time Warner	Viad(1)
Sodexo	Time Warner Cable	VistaPrint
Solvay America	T-Mobile USA	Vulcan Materials(1)
Sonoco Products	Toro(1)	VWR International
Sony Corporation	Tower International(1)	Walt Disney
Space Systems Loral(1)	Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America	Warner Chilcott(1)
Sprint Nextel	Transocean	Waste Management
SPX	Trepp(1)	Watson Pharmaceuticals
Staples	Trident Seafoods(1)	Wendy’s Group(1)
	Trinity Industries(1)	Westlake Chemical
Starbucks Coffee Company	Tronox(1)	Weyerhaeuser
Starwood Hotels & Resorts	TRW Automotive	Whirlpool
Statoil	Tupperware Brands(1)	Wm. Wrigley Jr.
Stepan Company(1)	Tyson Foods	Xerox
Stryker	Underwriters Laboratories(1)	Xylem
Sundt Construction(1)	Unilever United States	YRC Worldwide
Swagelok(1)	Union Pacific Corporation	Yum! Brands
Syngenta Crop Protection	Unisys	Zebra Technologies(1)

The Towers Watson “Total Sample” executive database of companies reflected in this Annex A was used to benchmark Named Executive Officers’ 2012 total compensation. In cases where sub-categories of this database provided more comparable roles and responsibilities against which to benchmark, those more comparable sectors were used. Given the nature of Mr. Kennedy’s role at the Company, which is not a full-time position, there is very little comparable data available for 2012. Messrs. Ennis’, Berns’ and Kretzman’s compensation was benchmarked against the Towers Watson executive database sector of $1 — $3 billion revenue companies; Mr. Elshaw’s total compensation was benchmarked against the Towers Watson executive database of $800 million — $2 billion revenue groups (e.g., multiple profit centers or business units) within the Total Sample.

(1)	These companies are within the sub-category of $1 — $3 billion revenue companies.

A-3

Annex B

REVLON, INC.

2013 AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICY

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES

The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the Company’s independent auditor, KPMG LLP (“KPMG LLP” or the “independent auditor”), in order to assure that KPMG LLP’s provision of such services does not impair its independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditor is within the pre-approved services and dollar limits set forth in the appendices attached to this Policy, the provision of such service by the independent auditor will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

The appendices to this Policy describe the Audit Services, Audit-Related Services, Tax Services and All Other Services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee for 2013, as well as the applicable dollar limits for the particular services. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.

II.

DELEGATION

The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members for Audit-Related, Tax Services or All Other Services (each as defined below) to be provided by the independent auditor (but excluding Annual Audit Services referred to in Section III below and prohibited services referred to in Section VII below). Specifically, the Chairman of the Audit Committee may approve services which are not Annual Audit Services referred to in Section III below or prohibited services referred to in Section VII below if the fees as to any applicable project will not exceed $35,000, provided that the independent auditor complies with any applicable rules or requirements of this Policy to document the services to the Audit Committee and to discuss such services with the Audit Committee. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at least quarterly on the services provided by KPMG LLP and the approximate fees paid or payable to KPMG LLP for such services during the preceding quarter, including a report on any services pre-approved during such quarter by the Chairman of the Audit Committee pursuant to this Section II.

III.

AUDIT SERVICES

The terms and fees of the annual Audit Services engagement, including, without limitation, the independent auditor’s services in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and the independent auditor’s review of the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will also approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope or other matters.

In addition to the foregoing annual Audit Services engagement, the Audit Committee may grant pre-approval for other Audit Services, which are those services that are normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years and other services that generally only the independent auditor reasonably can provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. The Audit Committee has

B-1

pre-approved the other Audit Services listed in Appendix A, provided that such services do not exceed the pre-approved fees set forth on Appendix A. All other Audit Services not listed in Appendix A must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

IV.

AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES

Audit-Related Services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor, and in each case which are not covered by the Audit Services described in Section III. Such services could include, among other things, employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, accounting consultations and audits in connection with acquisitions, attest services and internal control reviews that are not required by statute and regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. The Audit Committee believes that the provision of Audit-Related Services does not impair the independence of the auditor, and has pre-approved the Audit-Related Services listed in Appendix B, provided that such services do not exceed the pre-approved fees set forth on Appendix B. All other Audit-Related Services not listed in Appendix B must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee, except to the extent covered by the delegation of authority under Section II above. As to all non-audit internal control services for the Company, the independent auditor must — (1) describe in writing to the Audit Committee the scope of the proposed non-audit internal control service; (2) discuss with the Audit Committee any potential effects on the independent auditor’s independence that could be caused by the independent auditor’s performance of the proposed non-audit internal control service; and (3) document the substance of such discussions with the Audit Committee.

TAX SERVICES

The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide certain Tax Services to the Company, such as (i) tax compliance (e.g., preparing original and amended state and federal corporate tax returns, planning for estimated tax payments and preparation of tax return extensions); (ii) tax advice; and (iii) tax planning, without impairing the auditor’s independence. Tax advice and tax planning could include, without limitation, assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions and employee benefit plans and request for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities. However, the Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor (or any affiliate of the independent auditor) in connection with the provision of any prohibited tax service listed in Exhibit 1 to the Company or its affiliates, as the PCAOB has determined that such prohibited tax services would impair the independent auditor’s independence.

The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Tax Services listed in Appendix C, provided that such services do not exceed the pre-approved fees set forth on Appendix C. All other Tax Services for the Company not listed in Appendix C must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee, except to the extent covered by the delegation of authority under Section II above, provided that the independent auditor complies with any applicable rules and the following requirements to document the applicable Tax Services to the Audit Committee and to discuss such services with the Audit Committee.

As to all Tax Services for the Company, the independent auditor must — (1) describe in writing to the Audit Committee the scope of the proposed Tax Service, the proposed fee structure for the engagement and any agreement between the independent auditor and the Company and its affiliates relating to the proposed Tax Service; (2) describe in writing to the Audit Committee any compensation arrangement or other agreement, such as a referral agreement, a referral fee or fee-sharing arrangement, between the independent auditor or any of its affiliates and any person (other than the Company and its affiliates) with respect to the promoting, marketing or recommending of any transaction covered by the Tax Service; (3) discuss with the Audit Committee any potential effects of the proposed Tax Services on the independence of the independent auditor; and (4) document the substance of such discussions with the Audit Committee.

B-2

VI.

ALL OTHER SERVICES

The Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to those permissible non-audit services classified as All Other Services that it believes are routine and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the auditor, provided such All Other Services may not include Audit Services referred to in Section III above or prohibited services referred to in Section VII below. The Audit Committee has pre-approved the All Other Services listed in Appendix D, provided that such services do not exceed the pre-approved fees set forth on Appendix D. Permissible All Other Services other than those listed in Appendix D must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee, except to the extent covered by the delegation of authority under Section II above.

VII.

PROHIBITED SERVICES

The Company will not retain its independent auditors for any services that are “prohibited services” as defined by applicable statutes or regulations, as may be in effect from time to time, including, without limitation, those services prohibited by Section 201(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC’s or the PCAOB’s rules and regulations and such other rules and regulations as may be promulgated thereunder from time to time. Attached to this policy as Exhibit 1 is a current list of the SEC’s and PCAOB’s prohibited non-audit services, including prohibited tax services.

VIII. PRE-APPROVAL

FEE LEVELS

Pre-approval fee levels for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any services proposed to be provided by the independent auditors during a fiscal year exceeding these levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

IX.

PROCEDURES

Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee may be submitted to the Audit Committee by the independent auditor and any of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller or General Counsel.

B-3

Appendix A

Pre-Approved Audit Services for Fiscal Year 2013

Dated: October 24, 2012


Service	Total Pre-Approved Annual Fees for Pre-Approved Audit Services:
1. Statutory audits or financial audits for subsidiaries of the Company	$	50,000
2. Services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings (e.g., comfort letters, consents), and assistance in responding to SEC comment letters
3. Consultations by the Company’s management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard setting bodies

B-4

Appendix B

Pre-Approved Audit-Related Services for Fiscal Year 2013

Dated: October 24, 2012


Service	Total Pre-Approved Annual Fees for Pre-Approved Audit-Related Services:
1. Due diligence services pertaining to potential business acquisitions/dispositions	$	200,000
2. Financial statement audits of employee benefit plans
3. Agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters
4. Attest services and internal control reviews not required by statute or regulation
5. Audit work in connection with liquidations and contract terminations; legal entity dissolution/restructuring assistance; and inventory audits

The foregoing pre-approval of non-audit internal control services identified on this Appendix B is subject in all cases to compliance with Section IV of this Pre-Approval Policy, including without limitation, compliance with applicable rules to document the services to the Audit Committee and to discuss such services with the Audit Committee.

B-5

Appendix C

Pre-Approved Tax Services for Fiscal Year 2013*

Dated: October 24, 2012


Service	Total Pre-Approved Annual Fees for Pre-Approved Tax Services:
1. U.S. federal, state and local tax compliance, including, without limitation, review of income, franchise and other tax returns	$	400,000
2. International tax compliance, including, without limitation, review of income, franchise and other tax returns
3. U.S. federal, state and local tax advice, including, without limitation, general tax advisory services
4. International tax advice, including, without limitation, intercompany pricing and advanced pricing agreement services, general tax advisory services and tax audits and appeals services

The foregoing pre-approval of Tax Services identified on this Appendix C is subject in all cases to compliance with Section V of this Pre-Approval Policy, including without limitation, compliance with applicable rules to document the services to the Audit Committee and to discuss such services with the Audit Committee.

B-6

Appendix D

Pre-Approved All Other Services for Fiscal Year 2013

Dated: October 24, 2012


Service	Total Pre-Approved Annual Fees for Pre-Approved All Other Services:
All Other Services approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee pursuant to Section II of this policy, provided that the independent auditor complies with any applicable rules and requirements of this Policy to document the services to the Audit Committee and to discuss such services with the Audit Committee (and in each case excluding Audit Services described in Section III and prohibited services described in Section VII).	$	35,000 per project

B-7

Exhibit 1

I.	PROHIBITED NON-AUDIT SERVICES

•

Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client

•

Financial information systems design and implementation^*

•

Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports^*

•

Actuarial services^*

•

Internal audit outsourcing services^*

•

Management functions

•

Human resources

•

Broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services

•

Legal services

•

Expert services unrelated to the audit

Each of these prohibited services is subject to applicable exceptions under the SEC’s rules.

*	Unless it is reasonable to conclude that the results of these services will not be subject to audit procedures during an audit of the audit client’s financial statements.

II.

PROHIBITED TAX SERVICES

The PCAOB has determined the following services to be “Prohibited Tax Services” for the independent auditor (including any affiliate of the independent auditor, as defined in PCAOB Rule 3501(a)(i)):

•

any service or product by the independent auditor or any of its affiliates for the Company and its affiliates for a contingent fee or a commission, including any fee established for the sale of a product or the performance of any service pursuant to an arrangement in which no fee would be payable unless a specified finding or result is attained or the amount of the fee is otherwise dependent on the finding or result of such product or service, taking into account any rights to reimbursements, refunds or other repayments that could modify the amount received in a manner that make it contingent on a finding or result (excluding fees where the amount is fixed by courts or other public authorities and is not dependent on a finding or result), or the independent auditor or any of its affiliates receives, directly or indirectly, a contingent fee or commission;

•

non-audit services by the independent auditor or any of its affiliates for the Company and its affiliates related to marketing, planning or opining in favor of the tax treatment of a “confidential transaction” as defined under PCAOB Rule 3501(c)(i) or an “aggressive tax position transaction” (including, without limitation, any transaction that is a “listed transaction” under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations) that was (i) initially recommended, directly or indirectly, by the independent auditor or another tax advisor with which the independent auditor has a formal agreement or other arrangement related to the promotion of such transactions, and (ii) a significant purpose of which is tax avoidance, unless the proposed tax treatment is at least more likely than not to be allowable under applicable tax laws; and

•

tax services by the independent auditor or any of its affiliates for persons that serve in a financial reporting oversight role at the Company or its affiliates, including any employee who is in a position to, or does, exercise influence over the contents of the Company’s financial statements or any employee who prepares the financial statements, including, without limitation, the Company’s chief executive officer, president, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, general counsel, chief accounting officer, controller, director of internal audit, director of financial reporting, treasurer or any equivalent position, including for any immediate family member of such employees (being such employee’s spouse, spousal

B-8

equivalent and dependents), but excluding tax services for (i) any person who serves in a financial reporting oversight role for the Company or its affiliates solely because such person serves as a member of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee, any other Board committee or similar management or governing body of the Company or its affiliates (in each case who do not otherwise occupy an employment position in a financial oversight role), (ii) any person serving in a financial reporting oversight role at the Company or its affiliates only because of such person’s relationship to an affiliate of the Company if such affiliate’s financial statements (1) are not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements or (2) are audited by an auditor other than the Company’s independent auditor or its associated persons and (iii) employees who were not in a financial reporting oversight role for the Company or its affiliates before a hiring, promotion or other change in employment event and the tax services were provided by the independent auditor or any of its affiliates to such person pursuant to an engagement in process before the hiring, promotion or other change in employment event, provided that such tax services are completed on or before 180 days after the hiring or promotion event.

Last reviewed and updated as of October, 2012

B-9

LOGO

1 1 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 000000000000 NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC.—COMMON 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS A 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS B 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS C 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS D 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS E 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS F 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—401 K 123,456,789,012.12345 ? x 02 0000000000 JOB # 1 OF 2 1 OF 2 PAGE SHARES CUSIP # SEQUENCE # THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date CONTROL # SHARES To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark ?For All Except? and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000173445_1 R1.0.0.51160 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Ronald O. Perelman 02 Alan S. Bernikow 03 Alan T. Ennis 04 Meyer Feldberg 05 David L. Kennedy 06 Debra L. Lee 07 Tamara Mellon 08 Barry F. Schwartz 09 Kathi P. Seifert 10 Viet D. Dinh 11 Cecelia Kurzman 12 Diana F. Cantor REVLON, INC. ATTN: Investor Relations PO BOX 6114 OXFORD,NC27565 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 2 Proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. NOTE: Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Yes No Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting

LOGO

0000173445_2 R1.0.0.51160 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF REVLON, INC. To be held on June 6, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) at the Revlon Research Center, 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818 Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/ are available at www.proxyvote.com . REVLON, INC. Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders CLASS A COMMON STOCK Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders The undersigned hereby appoints Lauren Goldberg, Esq., Michael T. Sheehan, Esq., and Marc R. Esterman, Esq. as proxies, each with the full power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side of this card, all shares of Class A Common Stock of Revlon, Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 12, 2013, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on June 6, 2013 or any postponement or adjournment thereof. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION, THIS PROXY (IF OTHERWISE VALIDLY SUBMITTED) WILL BE VOTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR EACH PROPOSAL, AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Address change/comments: Continued and to be signed on reverse side

LOGO

1 1 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 000000000000 NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC.—COMMON 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS A 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS B 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS C 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS D 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS E 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS F 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—401 K 123,456,789,012.12345 ? x 02 0000000000 JOB # 1 OF 2 1 OF 2 PAGE SHARES CUSIP # SEQUENCE # THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date CONTROL # SHARES To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark ?For All Except? and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000173446_1 R1.0.0.51160 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Ronald O. Perelman 02 Alan S. Bernikow 03 Alan T. Ennis 04 Meyer Feldberg 05 David L. Kennedy 06 Debra L. Lee 07 Tamara Mellon 08 Barry F. Schwartz 09 Kathi P. Seifert 10 Viet D. Dinh 11 Cecelia Kurzman 12 Diana F. Cantor REVLON, INC. ATTN: Investor Relations PO BOX 6114 OXFORD,NC27565 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 2 Proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. NOTE: Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Yes No Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting

LOGO

0000173446_2 R1.0.0.51160 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF REVLON, INC. To be held on June 6, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) at the Revlon Research Center, 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818 Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/ are available at www.proxyvote.com . REVLON, INC. Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders CLASS B COMMON STOCK Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders The undersigned hereby appoints Lauren Goldberg, Esq., Michael T. Sheehan, Esq., and Marc R. Esterman, Esq. as proxies, each with the full power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side of this card, all shares of Class B Common Stock of Revlon, Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 12, 2013, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on June 6, 2013 or any postponement or adjournment thereof. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION, THIS PROXY (IF OTHERWISE VALIDLY SUBMITTED) WILL BE VOTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR EACH PROPOSAL, AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Address change/comments: Continued and to be signed on reverse side

LOGO

1 1 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 000000000000 NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC.—COMMON 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS A 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS B 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS C 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS D 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS E 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS F 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—401 K 123,456,789,012.12345 ? x 02 0000000000 JOB # 1 OF 2 1 OF 2 PAGE SHARES CUSIP # SEQUENCE # THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date CONTROL # SHARES To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark ?For All Except? and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000173613_1 R1.0.0.51160 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Ronald O. Perelman 02 Alan S. Bernikow 03 Alan T. Ennis 04 Meyer Feldberg 05 David L. Kennedy 06 Debra L. Lee 07 Tamara Mellon 08 Barry F. Schwartz 09 Kathi P. Seifert 10 Viet D. Dinh 11 Cecelia Kurzman 12 Diana F. Cantor REVLON, INC. ATTN: Investor Relations PO BOX 6114 OXFORD,NC27565 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 2 Proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. NOTE: Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Yes No Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting

LOGO

0000173613_2 R1.0.0.51160 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF REVLON, INC. To be held on June 6, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) at the Revlon Research Center, 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818 Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/ are available at www.proxyvote.com . REVLON, INC. Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Series A Preferred Stock Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders The undersigned hereby appoints Lauren Goldberg, Esq., Michael T. Sheehan, Esq., and Marc R. Esterman, Esq. as proxies, each with the full power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side of this card, all shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Revlon, Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 12, 2013, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on June 6, 2013 or any postponement or adjournment thereof. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION, THIS PROXY (IF OTHERWISE VALIDLY SUBMITTED) WILL BE VOTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR EACH PROPOSAL, AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Address change/comments: Continued and to be signed on reverse side

LOGO

1 1 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 000000000000 NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC.—COMMON 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS A 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS B 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS C 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS D 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS E 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—CLASS F 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC.—401 K 123,456,789,012.12345 ? x 02 0000000000 JOB # 1 OF 2 1 OF 2 PAGE SHARES CUSIP # SEQUENCE # THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date CONTROL # SHARES To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark ?For All Except? and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000173447_1 R1.0.0.51160 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Ronald O. Perelman 02 Alan S. Bernikow 03 Alan T. Ennis 04 Meyer Feldberg 05 David L. Kennedy 06 Debra L. Lee 07 Tamara Mellon 08 Barry F. Schwartz 09 Kathi P. Seifert 10 Viet D. Dinh 11 Cecelia Kurzman 12 Diana F. Cantor REVLON, INC. ATTN: Investor Relations PO BOX 6114 OXFORD,NC27565 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on the day before the meeting date (or, if the 401(k) Plan holds voting capital stock for your account, by May 24, 2013). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 2 Proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. NOTE: Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Yes No Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting

LOGO

0000173447_2 R1.0.0.51160 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF REVLON, INC. To be held on June 6, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) at the Revlon Research Center, 2121 Route 27, Edison, NJ 08818 Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/ are available at www.proxyvote.com . REVLON, INC. Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Revlon Employees’ Savings, Investment and Profit Sharing Plan (The “Plan”) Participants Proxy for June 6, 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders The undersigned hereby appoints Lauren Goldberg, Esq., Michael T. Sheehan, Esq., and Marc R. Esterman, Esq. as proxies, each with the full power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side of this card, all shares of Class A Common Stock of Revlon, Inc. held of record by the Plan for the account of the undersigned at the close of business on April 12, 2013, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on June 6, 2013 or any postponement or adjournment thereof. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION, THIS PROXY (IF OTHERWISE VALIDLY SUBMITTED) WILL BE VOTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR EACH PROPOSAL, AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Address change/comments: Continued and to be signed on reverse side