UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34385
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 26-2749336 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800 Atlanta, Georgia |
30309 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(404) 892-0896
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-Accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 4, 2011, there were 115,390,095 outstanding shares of common stock of Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||
1 | ||||||
Item 1. |
1 | |||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010 |
1 | |||||
2 | ||||||
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
3 | |||||
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
26 | ||||
Item 3. |
44 | |||||
Item 4. |
46 | |||||
48 | ||||||
Item 1. |
48 | |||||
Item 1A. |
48 | |||||
Item 2. |
49 | |||||
Item 3. |
49 | |||||
Item 4. |
49 | |||||
Item 5. |
50 | |||||
Item 6. |
52 |
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
$ in thousands, except per share amounts | As of | |||||||
September 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value |
14,336,951 | 5,578,333 | ||||||
Cash |
56,914 | 63,552 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
254,587 | 101,144 | ||||||
Investment related receivable |
430,053 | 7,601 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated ventures, at fair value |
110,907 | 54,725 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
55,713 | 22,503 | ||||||
Derivative assets, at fair value |
1,580 | 33,255 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,812 | 1,287 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
15,248,517 | 5,862,400 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
12,181,845 | 4,344,659 | ||||||
Derivative liability, at fair value |
388,886 | 37,850 | ||||||
Dividends and distributions payable |
93,449 | 49,741 | ||||||
Investment related payable |
640,766 | 372,285 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
10,780 | 2,579 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
916 | 1,065 | ||||||
Due to affiliate |
8,092 | 3,407 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
13,324,734 | 4,811,586 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred Stock: par value $0.01 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common Stock: par value $0.01 per share; 450,000,000 shares authorized, 115,387,548 and 49,854,196 shares issued and outstanding, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
1,154 | 499 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
2,299,309 | 1,002,809 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(386,187 | ) | 24,015 | |||||
Distributions in excess of earnings |
(15,648 | ) | (8,173 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total shareholders equity |
1,898,628 | 1,019,150 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
25,155 | 31,664 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
1,923,783 | 1,050,814 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and equity |
15,248,517 | 5,862,400 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months
Ended September 30, |
Nine Months
Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
$ in thousands, except per share data | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
138,291 | 36,067 | 315,808 | 83,284 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
50,452 | 8,873 | 100,237 | 18,904 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net interest income |
87,839 | 27,194 | 215,571 | 64,380 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other income |
||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of investments |
3,637 | (311 | ) | 8,442 | 1,064 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) and fair value change in unconsolidated ventures |
(993 | ) | 3,793 | 2,738 | 5,888 | |||||||||||
Loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
| (124 | ) | | (510 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps |
(453 | ) | (9 | ) | (655 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||
Realized and unrealized credit default swap income |
858 | | 4,649 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other income |
3,049 | 3,349 | 15,174 | 6,398 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Management fee related party |
7,884 | 2,039 | 17,612 | 5,094 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
829 | 885 | 2,855 | 2,839 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total expenses |
8,713 | 2,924 | 20,467 | 7,933 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
82,175 | 27,619 | 210,278 | 62,845 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
1,091 | 1,433 | 3,948 | 3,860 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
81,084 | 26,186 | 206,330 | 58,985 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders (basic/diluted) |
0.79 | 1.01 | 2.70 | 2.74 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
0.80 | 1.00 | 2.77 | 2.52 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average number of shares of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
103,028 | 26,047 | 76,311 | 21,552 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
104,472 | 27,478 | 77,750 | 22,981 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Attributable to Common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ in thousands, except per share |
Common Stock | Additional Paid in Capital |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) |
Distributions
in excess of earnings |
Total Shareholders Equity |
Non- Controlling Interest |
Total Equity |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
49,854,196 | 499 | 1,002,809 | 24,015 | (8,173 | ) | 1,019,150 | 31,664 | 1,050,814 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 206,330 | 206,330 | 3,948 | 210,278 | 210,278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities |
| | | (33,016 | ) | | (33,016 | ) | (62 | ) | (33,078 | ) | (33,078 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives |
| | | (377,186 | ) | | (377,186 | ) | (6,450 | ) | (383,636 | ) | (383,636 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
(206,436 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs |
65,527,839 | 655 | 1,296,364 | | | 1,297,019 | | 1,297,019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock awards |
5,513 | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends |
| | | | (213,805 | ) | (213,805 | ) | | (213,805 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common unit dividends |
| | | | | | (3,947 | ) | (3,947 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of equity-based compensation |
| | 136 | | | 136 | 2 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
115,387,548 | 1,154 | 2,299,309 | (386,187 | ) | (15,648 | ) | 1,898,628 | 25,155 | 1,923,783 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.
3
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
$ in thousands | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
210,278 | 62,845 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Amortization of mortgage-backed securities premiums and discounts, net |
25,195 | (9,827 | ) | |||||
Unrealized loss on interest swap |
655 | 44 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on credit default swap |
(1,580 | ) | | |||||
Gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities |
(8,442 | ) | (1,064 | ) | ||||
Loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
| 510 | ||||||
Equity in earnings and fair value change in unconsolidated limited partnerships |
(2,738 | ) | (5,888 | ) | ||||
Amortization of equity-based compensation |
138 | 85 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Increase in accrued interest |
(33,210 | ) | (7,432 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(525 | ) | 330 | |||||
Increase in accrued interest payable |
8,201 | 1,003 | ||||||
Increase in due to affiliate |
4,685 | 1,385 | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(208 | ) | 570 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
202,449 | 42,561 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
||||||||
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities |
(10,720,992 | ) | (2,022,403 | ) | ||||
Contributions to Investment in PPIP, net |
(52,013 | ) | (50,890 | ) | ||||
Principal payments from mortgage-backed securities |
936,444 | 265,904 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of mortgage-backed securities |
1,180,416 | 216,104 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(8,656,145 | ) | (1,591,285 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
1,297,079 | 341,986 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
(144,615 | ) | (25,802 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from repurchase agreements |
63,074,773 | 11,092,883 | ||||||
Principal repayments of repurchase agreements |
(55,606,134 | ) | (9,889,889 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from TALF financing |
| 71,525 | ||||||
Principal payments of TALF financing |
| (146 | ) | |||||
Payments of dividends and distributions |
(174,045 | ) | (45,480 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
8,447,058 | 1,545,077 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash |
(6,638 | ) | (3,647 | ) | ||||
Cash, beginning of period |
63,552 | 24,041 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash, end of period |
56,914 | 20,394 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplement disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Interest paid |
92,036 | 17,831 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities information |
||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities and derivatives |
(416,714 | ) | 3,834 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in investment in PPIP |
(1,431 | ) | 384 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in restricted cash |
(8,828 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dividends and distributions declared not paid |
43,708 | 27,473 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Payable for mortgage-backed securities purchased |
(204,317 | ) | 57,016 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Repurchase agreements, not settled |
368,547 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1 Organization and Business Operations
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (the Company) is a Maryland corporation focused on investing in, financing and managing residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans. The Company invests in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) for which a U.S. Government Agency such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) guarantees payments of principal and interest on the securities (collectively Agency RMBS). The Companys Agency RMBS investments include mortgage pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). The Company also invests in RMBS that are not issued or guaranteed by a U.S. government Agency (non-Agency RMBS), commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), and residential and commercial mortgage loans. The Company is externally managed and advised by Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the Manager), a registered investment adviser and an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. (Invesco), a global investment management company.
The Company conducts its business through IAS Operating Partnership LP (the Operating Partnership) as its sole general partner. As of September 30, 2011, the Company owned 98.8% of the Operating Partnership and Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Invesco, owned the remaining 1.2%.
The Company finances its Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS investments through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. The Manager has secured commitments for the Company with a number of repurchase agreement counterparties. In addition, the Company had financed its CMBS portfolio with financings under the U.S. governments Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) which were repaid and replaced with repurchase agreements during 2010. The Company has also financed its investments in certain non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and residential and commercial mortgage loans by contributing capital to a partnership that invests in the public private investments funds (the PPIF) managed by the Companys Manager. In addition, the Company may use other sources of financing including committed borrowing facilities and other private financing.
The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), commencing with the Companys taxable year ended December 31, 2009. To maintain the Companys REIT qualification, the Company is generally required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders annually.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Quarterly Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations of the Company for the interim periods presented have been included. Certain disclosures included in the Companys annual report are not required to be included on an interim basis in the companys quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q. The Company has condensed or omitted these disclosures. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 14, 2011. The results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other future period.
5
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to U.S. GAAP. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Examples of estimates include, but are not limited to, estimates of the fair values of financial instruments, interest income on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and other-than-temporary impairment charges. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments that have original or remaining maturity dates of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At September 30, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, including amounts restricted, in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, deposit insurance limit of $250,000 per institution. The Company mitigates its risk of loss by placing cash and cash equivalents with numerous major financial institutions.
Deferred Offering Costs
The Company records costs associated with stock offerings as a reduction in additional paid in capital. The Company includes deferred offering costs in other assets.
Underwriting Commissions and Costs
Underwriting commissions and direct costs incurred in connection with the Companys initial public offering (IPO) and subsequent follow-on common stock offerings are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital.
Repurchase Agreements
The Company finances its Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and its CMBS investment portfolio through the use of repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements.
In instances where the Company acquires Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS or CMBS through repurchase agreements with the same counterparty from whom the Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS or CMBS were purchased, the Company accounts for the purchase commitment and repurchase agreement on a net basis and records a forward commitment to purchase Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS or CMBS as a derivative instrument if the transaction does not comply with the criteria for gross presentation. All of the following criteria must be met for gross presentation in the circumstance where the repurchase assets are financed with the same counterparty:
| the initial transfer of and repurchase financing cannot be contractually contingent; |
| the repurchase financing entered into between the parties provides full recourse to the transferee and the repurchase price is fixed; |
| the financial asset has an active market and the transfer is executed at market rates; and |
| the repurchase agreement and financial asset do not mature simultaneously. |
6
If the transaction complies with the criteria for gross presentation, the Company records the assets and the related financing on a gross basis on its balance sheet, and the corresponding interest income and interest expense in its statements of operations. Such forward commitments are recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in income. Additionally, the Company records the cash portion of its investment in Agency RMBS and non-Agency RMBS as a mortgage related receivable from the counterparty on its balance sheet.
For assets representing available-for-sale investment securities any change in fair value is reported through consolidated other comprehensive income (loss) with the exception of impairment losses, which are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB updated guidance entitled, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The guidance required a number of additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, entities should disclose: (1) the amount of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers; (2) the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3; and (3) information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. Except for the requirement to disclose information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements on a gross basis, all the amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company adopted these provisions in preparing its Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2010. The adoption of these provisions only affected the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and as a result had no impact on the Companys consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets.
The Company discloses the fair value of its financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy (Levels 1, 2, and 3, as defined). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company is required to provide enhanced disclosures regarding instruments in the Level 3 category (which require significant management judgment), including a separate reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for each major category of assets and liabilities.
Additionally, U.S. GAAP permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value (the fair value option). Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are irrevocably recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
During 2009 and 2011, the Company elected the fair value option for its investments in unconsolidated ventures. The Company has the one-time option to elect fair value for these financial assets on the election date. The changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in equity in earnings and fair value change in unconsolidated ventures in the consolidated statements of operations.
Securities
The Company designates securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading depending on its ability and intent to hold such securities to maturity. Trading and securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value, while securities held-to-maturity are reported at amortized cost. Although the Company generally intends to hold most of its RMBS and CMBS until maturity, the Company may, from time to time, sell any of its RMBS or CMBS as part of its overall management of its investment portfolio and as such will classify its RMBS and CMBS as available-for-sale securities.
All securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, based on market prices from third-party sources, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders equity. When applicable, included with available-for-sale securities are forward purchase commitments on to be announced securities (TBA). The Company records TBA purchases on the trade date and the corresponding payable is recorded as an outstanding liability as a payable for investments purchased until the settlement date of the transaction. This is presented in the Investment related payable line item on the consolidated balance sheet.
7
The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. The determination of whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired involves judgments and assumptions based on subjective and objective factors. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of recovery, in fair value of the security, and (iii) the Companys intent and ability to retain its investment in the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
For debt securities, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to a credit loss or impairments on securities that the Company has the intent or for which it is more likely than not that the Company will need to sell before recovery are recognized in earnings and reflected as a reduction in the cost basis of the security. The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities related to other factors is recorded consistent with changes in the fair value of all other available-for-sale securities as a component of consolidated shareholders equity in other comprehensive income or loss with no change to the cost basis of the security.
Interest Income Recognition
Interest income on available-for-sale MBS, which includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on such MBS, is recognized over the life of the investment using the effective interest method. Management estimates, at the time of purchase, the future expected cash flows and determines the effective interest rate based on these estimated cash flows and the Companys purchase price. As needed, these estimated cash flows are updated and a revised yield is computed based on the current amortized cost of the investment. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number of assumptions subject to uncertainties and contingencies, including the rate and timing of principal payments (prepayments, repurchases, defaults and liquidations), the pass through or coupon rate and interest rate fluctuations. In addition, management must use its judgment to estimate interest payment shortfalls due to delinquencies on the underlying mortgage loans. These uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may impact managements estimates and its interest income. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based upon the specific identification method and recorded as gain (loss) on sale of available-for-sale securities in the consolidated statement of operations.
Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures
The Company has investments in unconsolidated ventures. In circumstances where the Company has a non-controlling interest but is deemed to be able to exert significant influence over the affairs of the enterprise the Company utilizes the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the initial investment is increased each period for additional capital contributions and a proportionate share of the entitys earnings and decreased for cash distributions and a proportionate share of the entitys losses.
The Company elected the fair value option for its investments in unconsolidated ventures. The election for investments in unconsolidated ventures was made upon their initial recognition in the financial statements. The Company has elected the fair value option for the investments in unconsolidated ventures for the purpose of enhancing the transparency of its financial condition.
The Company measures the fair value of the investments in unconsolidated ventures on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investments as permitted in guidance effective for the interim and annual periods ended after December 15, 2009.
Dividends and Distributions Payable
Dividends and distributions payable represent dividends declared at the balance sheet date which are payable to common shareholders and distributions declared at the balance sheet date which are payable to non-controlling interest common unit holders of the Operating Partnership, respectively.
8
Earnings per Share
The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income for the period by weighted-average shares of the Companys common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted income per share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (OP Units), and unvested restricted stock, but uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, as presented in the consolidated statements of operations, adjusted for changes in unrealized gains or losses on available for sale securities and changes in the fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments
U.S. GAAP provides disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. U.S. GAAP requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts, such as credit default swaps, that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP.
Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with the Companys taxable year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, the Company will generally not be subject to U.S. federal and applicable state and local corporate income tax to the extent that the Company makes qualifying distributions to its shareholders, and provided the Company satisfies on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, the REIT requirements including certain asset, income, distribution and stock ownership tests. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year in which the Company lost its REIT qualification. Accordingly, the Companys failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse impact on its results of operations and amounts available for distribution to its shareholders.
A REITs dividend paid deduction for qualifying dividends to the Companys shareholders is computed using its taxable income as opposed to net income reported on the consolidated financial statements. Taxable income, generally, will differ from net income reported on the consolidated financial statements because the determination of taxable income is based on tax regulations and not financial accounting principles.
9
The Company may elect to treat certain of its future subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS). In general, a TRS may hold assets and engage in activities that the Company cannot hold or engage in directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate-related business. A TRS is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
While a TRS will generate net income, a TRS can declare dividends to the Company which will be included in its taxable income and necessitate a distribution to its shareholders. Conversely, if the Company retains earnings at a TRS level, no distribution is required and the Company can increase book equity of the consolidated entity. The Company has no adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment of any uncertainties. The Company expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which will be included in general and administrative expense.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has adopted an equity incentive plan under which its independent directors, as part of their compensation for serving as directors, are eligible to receive quarterly restricted stock awards. In addition, the Company may compensate the officers and employees of the Manager under this plan pursuant to the management agreement.
Share-based compensation arrangements include share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions are recognized in the consolidated financial statements, based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued on the date of grant, for awards to the Companys independent directors. Compensation related to stock awards to officers and employees of the Manager are recorded at the estimated fair value of the award during the vesting period. The Company makes an upward or downward adjustment to compensation expense for the difference in the fair value at the date of grant and the date the award was earned.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Company has implemented a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (the Plan). Under the terms of the Plan, shareholders who participate in the Plan may purchase shares of common stock directly from the Company. Plan participants may also automatically reinvest all or a portion of their dividends for additional shares of stock.
Reclassifications
The presentation of certain prior period reported amounts has been reclassified to be consistent with the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or equity attributable to common shareholders.
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities
All of the Companys MBS are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are reported at fair value, which is determined by obtaining valuations from an independent source. If the fair value of a security is not available from a dealer or third-party pricing service, or such data appears unreliable, the Company may estimate the fair value of the security using a variety of methods including other pricing services, repurchase agreement pricing, discounted cash flow analysis, matrix pricing, option adjusted spread models and other fundamental analysis of observable market factors. At September 30, 2011, all of the Companys MBS values were based on values obtained from third-party pricing services. The following tables present certain information about the Companys investment portfolio at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
10
September 30, 2011
$ in thousands | Principal Balance |
Unamortized Premium (Discount) |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) |
Fair Value |
Net Weighted Average Coupon (1) |
Average Yield (2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate |
2,360,188 | 128,782 | 2,488,970 | 43,399 | 2,532,369 | 4.33 | % | 3.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
30 year fixed-rate |
5,701,102 | 400,866 | 6,101,968 | 110,900 | 6,212,868 | 5.17 | % | 3.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ARM |
92,785 | 1,850 | 94,635 | 2,087 | 96,722 | 3.53 | % | 3.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Hybrid ARM |
1,267,544 | 28,045 | 1,295,589 | 23,359 | 1,318,948 | 3.31 | % | 2.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Agency |
9,421,619 | 559,543 | 9,981,162 | 179,745 | 10,160,907 | 4.69 | % | 3.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
MBS-CMO |
629,502 | (487,871 | ) | 141,631 | 1,769 | 143,400 | 3.30 | % | 6.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS(3) |
3,061,712 | (316,705 | ) | 2,745,007 | (79,399 | ) | 2,665,608 | 5.84 | % | 6.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||
CMBS |
1,492,384 | (21,422 | ) | 1,470,962 | (103,926 | ) | 1,367,036 | 5.48 | % | 5.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
14,605,217 | (266,455 | ) | 14,338,762 | (1,811 | ) | 14,336,951 | 4.70 | % | 4.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Net weighted average coupon (WAC) is presented net of servicing and other fees. |
(2) | Average yield incorporates future prepayment and loss assumptions. |
(3) | The non-Agency RMBS held by the Company is 84.3% fixed rate and 15.7% floating rate, based on fair value. |
December 31, 2010
$ in thousands | Principal Balance |
Unamortized Premium (Discount) |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) |
Fair Value |
Net Weighted Average Coupon (1) |
Average Yield (2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate |
1,789,891 | 99,611 | 1,889,502 | (8,688 | ) | 1,880,814 | 4.49 | % | 2.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
30 year fixed-rate |
2,059,475 | 163,332 | 2,222,807 | 6,771 | 2,229,578 | 5.54 | % | 3.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ARM |
21,926 | 1,080 | 23,006 | (494 | ) | 22,512 | 4.23 | % | 2.55 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Hybrid ARM |
70,253 | 1,612 | 71,865 | 448 | 72,313 | 3.68 | % | 2.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Agency |
3,941,545 | 265,635 | 4,207,180 | (1,963 | ) | 4,205,217 | 5.03 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
MBS-CMO |
57,232 | (30,248 | ) | 26,984 | 1,821 | 28,805 | 4.92 | % | 3.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS:(3) |
1,168,797 | (339,501 | ) | 829,296 | 17,072 | 846,368 | 4.83 | % | 5.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
CMBS |
488,246 | (4,640 | ) | 483,606 | 14,337 | 497,943 | 5.35 | % | 5.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
5,655,820 | (108,754 | ) | 5,547,066 | 31,267 | 5,578,333 | 5.01 | % | 3.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Net weighted average coupon (WAC) is presented net of servicing and other fees. |
(2) | Average yield incorporates future prepayment and loss assumptions. |
(3) | The non-Agency RMBS held by the Company is 75.8% fixed rate and 24.2% floating rate, based on fair value. |
The components of the carrying value of the Companys investment portfolio at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are presented below.
$ in thousands | September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Principal balance |
14,605,217 | 5,655,820 | ||||||
Unamortized premium |
589,517 | 271,728 | ||||||
Unamortized discount |
(855,972 | ) | (380,482 | ) | ||||
Gross unrealized gains |
221,213 | 75,231 | ||||||
Gross unrealized losses |
(223,024 | ) | (43,964 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fair value |
14,336,951 | 5,578,333 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Companys investment portfolio, at fair value, according to estimated weighted average life classifications as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
$ in thousands |
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Less than one year |
82,942 | 26,214 | ||||||
Greater than one year and less than five years |
12,098,705 | 3,304,668 | ||||||
Greater than or equal to five years |
2,155,304 | 2,247,451 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
14,336,951 | 5,578,333 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
11
The following tables present the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of the Companys MBS by length of time that such securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:
September 30, 2011 | Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ in thousands | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate |
295,092 | (1,179 | ) | | | 295,092 | (1,179 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
30 year fixed-rate |
796,362 | (5,540 | ) | | | 796,362 | (5,540 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
ARM |
13,363 | (85 | ) | 7,126 | (198 | ) | 20,489 | (283 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Hybrid ARM |
50,825 | (259 | ) | | | 50,825 | (259 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Agency |
1,155,642 | (7,063 | ) | 7,126 | (198 | ) | 1,162,768 | (7,261 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
MBS-CMO |
42,091 | (2,894 | ) | | | 42,091 | (2,894 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS |
2,264,648 | (89,337 | ) | 36,000 | (5,879 | ) | 2,300,648 | (95,216 | ) | |||||||||||||||
CMBS |
1,083,808 | (117,653 | ) | | | 1,083,808 | (117,653 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
4,546,189 | (216,947 | ) | 43,126 | (6,077 | ) | 4,589,315 | (223,024 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 | Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ in thousands | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate |
1,039,444 | (17,284 | ) | | | 1,039,444 | (17,284 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
30 year fixed-rate |
802,118 | (10,885 | ) | | | 802,118 | (10,885 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
ARM |
14,911 | (251 | ) | 7,601 | (244 | ) | 22,512 | (495 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Hybrid ARM |
10,912 | (17 | ) | | | 10,912 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Agency |
1,867,385 | (28,437 | ) | 7,601 | (244 | ) | 1,874,986 | (28,681 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
MBS-CMO |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS |
370,839 | (13,242 | ) | | | 370,839 | (13,242 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
CMBS |
138,037 | (2,041 | ) | | | 138,037 | (2,041 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
2,376,261 | (43,720 | ) | 7,601 | (244 | ) | 2,383,862 | (43,964 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on the Companys Agency RMBS were $7.3 million at September 30, 2011. Due to the inherent credit quality of Agency RMBS, the Company determined that at September 30, 2011, any unrealized losses on its Agency RMBS portfolio were temporary.
Gross unrealized losses on the Companys MBS-CMO, non-Agency RMBS, and CMBS were $215.8 million at September 30, 2011. The Company does not consider these unrealized losses to be credit related, but rather due to non-credit related factors such as interest rates spreads, prepayment speeds, and market fluctuations. These investment securities are included in the Companys assessment for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis.
The following table presents the impact of the Companys MBS on its accumulated other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
$ in thousands |
Three Months ended September 30, 2011 |
Three Months ended September 30, 2010 |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income from investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on MBS at beginning of period |
32,110 | 33,921 | 31,267 | 12,741 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on MBS |
(33,921 | ) | 25,093 | (33,078 | ) | 46,273 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at the end of period |
(1,811 | ) | 59,014 | (1,811 | ) | 59,014 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company reclassified $3.1 million of net unrealized gains from other comprehensive income into gain on sale of investments as a result of the Company selling certain investments.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company reclassified $11.2 million of net unrealized gains from other comprehensive income into gain on sale of investments as a result of the Company selling certain investments.
The Company assesses its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis. When the fair value of an investment is less than its amortized cost at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which impairment is assessed, the impairment is designated as either temporary or other-than-temporary. In deciding on whether or not a security is other than temporarily impaired, the Company considers several factors, including the nature of the investment, communications from the trustees of securitizations regarding the credit quality of the security, the severity and duration of the impairment, the cause of the impairment, and the Companys intent that it is more likely than not that the Company can hold the security until recovery of its cost basis.
The following table presents the other-than-temporary impairments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
$ in thousands |
Three Months ended September 30, 2011 |
Three Months ended September 30, 2010 |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Credit related other-than-temporary impairments included in earnings |
| 124 | | 510 | ||||||||||||
Non-credit related other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
| 124 | | 510 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component of other-than-temporary impairments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
$ in thousands |
Three Months ended September 30, 2011 |
Three Months ended September 30, 2010 |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Cumulative credit loss amount at the beginning of the period |
510 | 386 | 510 | | ||||||||||||
Additions for credit losses for which other-than-temporary impairment had not been previously recognized |
| 124 | | 510 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative credit loss amount at end of period |
510 | 510 | 510 | 510 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents components of interest income on the Companys Agency and non-Agency portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
For the three months ended September 30, 2011 |
Net (Premium | |||||||||||
$ in thousands |
Coupon Interest |
Amortization)/Discount Accretion |
Interest Income |
|||||||||
Agency |
102,444 | (24,229 | ) | 78,215 | ||||||||
Non-Agency |
31,312 | 10,193 | 41,505 | |||||||||
CMBS |
18,634 | (8 | ) | 18,626 | ||||||||
Other |
(55 | ) | | (55 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
152,335 | (14,044 | ) | 138,291 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Net (Premium | |||||||||||
$ in thousands |
Coupon Interest |
Amortization)/Discount Accretion |
Interest Income |
|||||||||
Agency |
232,756 | (54,358 | ) | 178,398 | ||||||||
Non-Agency |
72,270 | 29,125 | 101,395 | |||||||||
CMBS |
36,012 | 38 | 36,050 | |||||||||
Other |
(35 | ) | | (35 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
341,003 | (25,195 | ) | 315,808 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 |
Net (Premium | |||||||||||
$ in thousands |
Coupon Interest |
Amortization)/Discount Accretion |
Interest Income |
|||||||||
Agency |
17,330 | (4,304 | ) | 13,026 | ||||||||
Non-Agency |
11,868 | 8,637 | 20,505 | |||||||||
CMBS |
2,458 | 69 | 2,527 | |||||||||
Other |
9 | | 9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
31,665 | 4,402 | 36,067 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
Net (Premium | |||||||||||
$ in thousands |
Coupon Interest |
Amortization)/Discount Accretion |
Interest Income |
|||||||||
Agency |
41,328 | (12,518 | ) | 28,810 | ||||||||
Non-Agency |
25,049 | 22,106 | 47,155 | |||||||||
CMBS |
7,059 | 239 | 7,298 | |||||||||
Other |
21 | | 21 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
73,457 | 9,827 | 83,284 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures
Invesco Mortgage Recovery Feeder Fund, L.P. and Invesco Mortgage Recovery Loans AIV, L.P.
The Company invested in certain non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and residential and commercial mortgage loans by contributing equity capital to a legacy securities PPIF managed by the Manager, Invesco Mortgage Recovery Feeder Fund, L.P. (the Invesco PPIP Fund) that receives financing under the U.S. governments Public Private Investment Program (PPIP). In addition, the Manager identified a whole loan transaction for the Company, which resulted in the Companys admission into an alternative investment vehicle, the Invesco Mortgage Recovery Loans AIV, L.P. (AIV). The Companys initial commitment in the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV was $25.0 million. During 2009 and 2010, the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV accepted additional subscriptions and the Company increased its overall commitment to $100.0 million which effectively increased the Companys initial ownership interest in the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV. As of March 31, 2010, the Invesco PPIP Fund stopped accepting investment subscriptions and was deemed closed. The Company made its first contributions to the Invesco PPIP Fund in October 2009. The Company is committed to fund approximately $4.7 million in aggregate of additional capital at September 30, 2011 for the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV. The Company realized approximately $823,000 and $6.4 million of equity in earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $2.0 million and $3.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company also realized $1.8 million and $3.7 million of unrealized loss from these investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $1.8 million and $2.1 million of unrealized appreciation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
The Companys non-controlling, unconsolidated ownership interests in these entities are accounted for under the equity method. Capital contributions, distributions, profits and losses of the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV are allocated in accordance with the terms of the entities limited partnership agreements. Such allocations may differ from the stated percentage interests, if any, as a result of preferred returns and allocation formulas as described in such agreements. The Company has made the fair value election for its investment in both unconsolidated ventures. The fair value measurement for the investment in unconsolidated ventures is based on the net asset value per share of the investment, or its equivalent.
14
IMRF Loan Portfolio Member LLC
On September 30, 2011, the Company invested in a portfolio of commercial mortgage loans by contributing $40 million of equity capital to IMRF Loan Portfolio Member LLC (IMRF), a limited partnership managed by AIV. IMRF acquired the mortgage portfolio on the same day. The Company has fully funded its commitment to IMRF. The Company recognized no income or loss in respect of its ownership interests in IMRF for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
The Companys non-controlling, unconsolidated ownership interest in IMRF is accounted for under the equity method. Capital contributions, distributions, profits and losses of IMRF are allocated in accordance with the terms of the entitys operating agreement. Such allocations may differ from the stated percentage interests, if any, as a result of preferred returns and allocation formulas as described in the agreement. The Company has made the fair value election for its investment in IMRF. The fair value measurement for the investment in unconsolidated limited liability companies is based on the net asset value per share of the investment, or its equivalent.
Note 5 Borrowings
Repurchase Agreements
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements to finance the majority of its portfolio of investments. The repurchase agreements bear interest at a contractually agreed rate. The repurchase obligations mature and typically reinvest every thirty days to one year and have a weighted average aggregate interest rate of 0.60% and 0.57% at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company entered into a repurchase agreement with a one year maturity. The facility was subsequently amended and expires in April 2012. These repurchase agreements are being accounted for as secured borrowings since the Company maintains effective control of the financed assets. The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Companys repurchase agreements at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
$ in thousands |
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Amount Outstanding |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Amount Outstanding |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
|||||||||||||
Agency RMBS |
9,044,073 | 0.29 | % | 3,483,440 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||||
Non-Agency RBS |
2,114,019 | 1.51 | % | 459,979 | 1.76 | % | ||||||||||
CMBS |
1,023,753 | 1.44 | % | 401,240 | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
12,181,845 | 0.60 | % | 4,344,659 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the repurchase agreements, the respective lender retains the right to mark the underlying collateral to fair value. A reduction in the value of pledged assets would require the Company to provide additional collateral or fund margin calls. In addition, the repurchase agreements are subject to certain financial covenants. The Company is in compliance with these covenants at September 30, 2011.
15
The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Companys repurchase agreements at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
September 30, 2011 $ in thousands Repurchase Agreement Counterparties |
Amount Outstanding |
Percent of
Total Amount Outstanding |
Company MBS Held as Collateral |
|||||||||
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
1,890,903 | 15.6 | % | 2,150,849 | ||||||||
Nomura Securities International, Inc. |
1,053,730 | 8.8 | % | 1,121,073 | ||||||||
South Street Securities LLC |
806,376 | 6.6 | % | 843,063 | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated |
770,108 | 6.3 | % | 817,329 | ||||||||
JP Morgan Securities Inc. |
717,926 | 5.9 | % | 806,086 | ||||||||
RBS Securities Inc. |
716,336 | 5.9 | % | 806,244 | ||||||||
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
661,223 | 5.4 | % | 703,328 | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
622,058 | 5.1 | % | 679,397 | ||||||||
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Financial Services LLC |
562,799 | 4.6 | % | 592,198 | ||||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Securities (USA), Inc. |
550,717 | 4.5 | % | 578,523 | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
527,256 | 4.3 | % | 570,577 | ||||||||
Barclays Capital Inc. |
521,437 | 4.3 | % | 583,016 | ||||||||
BNP Paribas Securities Corp. |
453,996 | 3.7 | % | 481,039 | ||||||||
Banc of America Securities LLC |
395,888 | 3.2 | % | 429,473 | ||||||||
CitiGroup Global Markets Inc. |
379,069 | 3.1 | % | 414,258 | ||||||||
Royal Bank of Canada |
345,173 | 2.8 | % | 367,478 | ||||||||
UBS Securities Inc. |
295,987 | 2.4 | % | 311,443 | ||||||||
Guggenheim Liquidity Services, LLC |
240,085 | 2.0 | % | 252,820 | ||||||||
Mizuho Securities USA Inc. |
172,289 | 1.4 | % | 189,794 | ||||||||
ING Financial Market LLC |
161,437 | 1.3 | % | 165,683 | ||||||||
Jefferies & Company, Inc |
129,899 | 1.1 | % | 138,011 | ||||||||
Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc |
116,077 | 1.0 | % | 122,061 | ||||||||
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. |
91,076 | 0.7 | % | 94,932 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
12,181,845 | 100.0 | % | 13,218,675 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 $ in thousands Repurchase Agreement Counterparties |
Amount Outstanding |
Percent of
Total Amount Outstanding |
Company MBS Held as Collateral |
|||||||||
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
974,369 | 22.4 | % | 1,072,719 | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
614,365 | 14.1 | % | 710,529 | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated |
468,748 | 10.8 | % | 511,022 | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
463,087 | 10.7 | % | 493,533 | ||||||||
Barclays Capital Inc. |
287,469 | 6.6 | % | 322,035 | ||||||||
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
273,369 | 6.4 | % | 291,512 | ||||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Securities (USA), Inc. |
261,594 | 6.0 | % | 273,131 | ||||||||
BNP Paribas Securities Corp. |
228,566 | 5.3 | % | 239,218 | ||||||||
JP Morgan Securities Inc. |
227,261 | 5.2 | % | 255,403 | ||||||||
RBS Securities Inc. |
210,332 | 4.8 | % | 241,331 | ||||||||
Banc of America Securities LLC |
200,081 | 4.6 | % | 220,018 | ||||||||
Nomura Securities International, Inc. |
135,418 | 3.1 | % | 144,586 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
4,344,659 | 100.0 | % | 4,775,037 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company MBS held by counterparties as security for repurchase agreements was $13.2 billion and $4.8 billion at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This represents a collateral ratio (Company MBS Held as Collateral/Amount Outstanding) of 109% and 110% respectively. The decline in the collateral ratio was due to the change in asset mix as the Company had a higher percentage of credit assets that generally have lower advance rates.
Cash collateral held by the counterparties at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $215.1 million and $81.3 million, respectively. In addition, cash collateral held by the Company at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $18.4 million and $11.1 million, respectively.
16
Note 6 Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its investments, debt funding, and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Companys derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Companys known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Companys investments and borrowings.
The Company also utilizes credit derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDS) to provide credit event protection based on a financial index or specific security in exchange for receiving a fixed-rate fee or premium over the term of the contract. These instruments enable the Company to synthetically assume the credit risk of a reference security, portfolio of securities or index of securities. The counterparty pays a premium to the Company and the Company agrees to make a payment to compensate the counterparty for losses upon the occurrence of a specified credit event.
Although contract-specific, credit events generally include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium. Upon the occurrence of a defined credit event, the difference between the value of the reference obligation and the CDSs notional amount is recorded as a realized loss in the statement of operations.
Our only CDS contract was entered into on December 31, 2010 where the Company sold protection on a specific pool of non-Agency RMBS that exceed a specified loss limit of 25% for a stated fixed rate fee of 3%. The Companys maximum exposure is the unpaid principal balance of the underlying RMBS that exceeds the specified loss limit. The Company is required to post cash collateral to secure potential loss payments.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the open CDS sold by the Company is summarized as follows:
$ in thousand |
September 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Fair value amount |
1,580 | | ||||||
Notional amount |
120,647 | 149,964 | ||||||
Maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments |
90,486 | 112,500 | ||||||
Recourse provisions with third parties |
| | ||||||
Collateral held by counterparty |
18,531 | |
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company finances its activities primarily through repurchase agreements, which are generally settled on a short-term basis, usually from one to three months. At each settlement date, the Company refinances each repurchase agreement at the market interest rate at that time. Since the interest rate on its repurchase agreements change on a one to twelve month basis, the Company is exposed to changing interest rates. The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the
17
period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded $453,000 of unrealized swap losses in earnings as hedge ineffectiveness attributable primarily to differences in the reset dates on the Companys swaps versus the refinancing dates of certain of its repurchase agreements. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded $9,000 of unrealized swap losses in earnings.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded $655,000 of unrealized swap losses in earnings as hedge ineffectiveness attributable primarily to differences in the reset dates on the Companys swaps versus the refinancing dates of certain of its repurchase agreements. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded $44,000 of unrealized swap losses in earnings.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest is accrued and paid on the Companys repurchase agreements. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $128.2 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 116 months.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had the following interest rate derivatives outstanding, that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
Counterparty |
Notional | Maturity Date | Fixed Interest Rate in Contract |
|||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
175,000 | 8/5/2012 | 2.07 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
100,000 | 5/24/2013 | 1.83 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
200,000 | 6/15/2013 | 1.73 | % | ||||||||
SunTrust Bank |
100,000 | 7/15/2014 | 2.79 | % | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
200,000 | 1/15/2015 | 1.08 | % | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
250,000 | 2/15/2015 | 1.14 | % | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International |
100,000 | 2/24/2015 | 3.26 | % | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International |
100,000 | 3/24/2015 | 2.76 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
100,000 | 7/15/2015 | 2.85 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
50,000 | 7/15/2015 | 2.44 | % | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
300,000 | 1/24/2016 | 2.12 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
300,000 | 1/24/2016 | 2.13 | % | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
300,000 | 4/5/2016 | 2.48 | % | ||||||||
Citibank, N.A. |
300,000 | 4/15/2016 | 1.67 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
500,000 | 4/15/2016 | 2.24 | % | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International |
500,000 | 4/15/2016 | 2.27 | % | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
500,000 | 5/16/2016 | 2.31 | % | ||||||||
Goldman Sachs Bank USA |
500,000 | 5/24/2016 | 2.34 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
250,000 | 6/15/2016 | 2.67 | % | ||||||||
Goldman Sachs Bank USA |
250,000 | 6/15/2016 | 2.67 | % | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
500,000 | 6/24/2016 | 2.51 | % | ||||||||
Citibank, N.A. |
500,000 | 10/15/2016 | 1.93 | % | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
150,000 | 2/5/2018 | 2.90 | % | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
100,000 | 4/5/2018 | 3.10 | % | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
200,000 | 5/15/2018 | 2.93 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
200,000 | 3/15/2021 | 3.14 | % | ||||||||
Citibank, N.A. |
200,000 | 5/25/2021 | 2.83 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
6,925,000 | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, the Companys counterparties held approximately $20.9 million of cash margin deposits and approximately $446.7 million in Agency RMBS as collateral against its swap contracts. The cash is classified as restricted cash and the Agency RMBS is included in the total mortgage-backed securities on our consolidated balance sheet.
18
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments, as well as their classification on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
$ in thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives |
Liability Derivatives |
|||||||||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2011 |
As of December 31, 2010 |
As of September 30, 2011 |
As of December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet |
Fair Value | Balance Sheet |
Fair Value | Balance Sheet |
Fair Value | Balance Sheet |
Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap asset | | Interest rate swap asset | 33,255 | Interest rate swap liability | 388,886 | Interest rate swap liability | 37,850 |
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Income Statement
The table below presents the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on the statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three months ended September 30, 2011
$ in thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative type for cash flow hedge |
Amount of loss
recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion) |
Location of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Amount of
loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Location of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion) |
Amount of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion |
|||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap |
301,503 | Interest Expense | 34,753 | Other Expense | 453 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011
$ in thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative type for cash flow hedge |
Amount of loss
recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion) |
Location of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Amount of
loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Location of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion) |
Amount of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion) |
|||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap | 450,545 | Interest Expense | 66,909 | Other Expense | 655 |
Three months ended September 30, 2010
$ in thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative type for cash flow hedge |
Amount of loss
recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion) |
Location of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Amount of
loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Location of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion) |
Amount of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion |
|||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap | 19,663 | Interest Expense | 4,702 | Other Expense | 9 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
$ in thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative type for cash flow hedge |
Amount of loss recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion) |
Location of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Amount of
loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) |
Location of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion) |
Amount of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion |
|||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap | 52,010 | Interest Expense | 9,572 | Other Expense | 44 |
19
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative | ||||||||||
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument |
Location of gain recognized in income on derivative |
Three months
ended September 30, 2011 |
Three months
ended September 30, 2010 |
|||||||
CDS Contract | Realized and unrealized credit default swap income | (105 | ) | |
Amount of gain recognized in income on derivative | ||||||||||
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument |
Location of gain recognized in income on derivative |
Nine months
ended September 30, 2011 |
Nine months
ended September 30, 2010 |
|||||||
CDS Contract | Realized and unrealized credit default swap income | 1,580 | |
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties. Some of those agreements contain a provision where if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
The Company has an agreement with one of its derivative counterparties that contains a provision where if the Companys net asset value declines by certain percentages over specified time periods, then the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Company also has an agreement with one of its derivative counterparties that contains a provision where if the Companys shareholders equity declines by certain percentages over specified time periods, then the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
The Company has an agreement with one of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company fails to maintain a minimum shareholders equity or market value of $100 million and $80 million, respectively, then the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $393.9 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and has posted collateral of approximately $20.9 million of cash and $446.7 million of Agency RMBS. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at September 30, 2011, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value. The Company was in compliance with all of the financial provisions of these agreements through September 30, 2011.
Note 7 Financial Instruments
U.S. GAAP defines fair value, provides a consistent framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820 expands fair value financial statement disclosure requirements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements and only applies to accounting pronouncements that already require or permit fair value measures, except for standards that relate to share-based payments.
Valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Companys market assumptions. The three levels are defined as follows:
| Level 1 Inputs Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
| Level 2 Inputs Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. |
20
| Level 3 Inputs Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers. |
The fair values on a recurring basis of the Companys MBS and interest rate hedges based on the level of inputs at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below:
September 30, 2011 Fair Value Measurements Using: |
||||||||||||||||
$ in thousands | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total at Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities(1) |
| 14,336,951 | | 14,336,951 | ||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated ventures |
| | 110,907 | 110,907 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
| | 1,580 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
| 14,336,951 | 112,487 | 14,449,438 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
| 388,886 | | 388,886 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
| 388,886 | | 388,886 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 Fair Value Measurements Using: |
||||||||||||||||
$ in thousands | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total at Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities(1) |
| 5,578,333 | | 5,578,333 | ||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated ventures |
| | 54,725 | 54,725 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
| 33,255 | | 33,255 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
| 5,611,588 | 54,725 | 5,666,313 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
| 37,850 | | 37,850 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
| 37,850 | | 37,850 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | For more detail about the fair value of our MBS and type of securities, see Note 3 in the unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
The following table presents additional information about the Companys investments in unconsolidated ventures which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
$ in thousands |
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Beginning balance |
54,725 | 4,128 | ||||||
Purchases |
74,366 | 56,357 | ||||||
Sales and settlements |
(20,922 | ) | (14,036 | ) | ||||
Total net gains / (losses) included in net income |
||||||||
Realized gains/(losses), net |
6,424 | 4,780 | ||||||
Unrealized gains/(losses), net |
(3,686 | ) | 3,496 | |||||
Unrealized gain/(losses), net included in other comprehensive income |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance |
110,907 | 54,725 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the repurchase agreements is based on an expected present value technique. This method discounts future estimated cash flows using rates the Company determined best reflect current market interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar characteristics and credit quality. At September 30, 2011 the repurchase agreements had a fair value of $12.2 billion and a carrying value of $12.2 billion. At December 31, 2010 the repurchase agreements had a fair value of $4.3 billion and a carrying value of $4.3 billion.
21
Note 8 Related Party Transactions
The Company is externally managed and advised by the Manager. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, the Manager provides the Company with its management team, including its officers, along with appropriate support personnel. Each of the Companys officers is an employee of Invesco or one of Invescos affiliates. The Company does not have any employees. With the exception of the Companys Chief Financial Officer, the Manager is not obligated to dedicate any of its employees exclusively to the Company, nor is the Manager or its employees obligated to dedicate any specific portion of its or their time to the Companys business. The Manager is at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of the Companys board of directors and has only such functions and authority as the Company delegates to it.
Management Fee
The Company pays the Manager a management fee equal to 1.50% of the Companys shareholders equity per annum, which is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears. For purposes of calculating the management fee, shareholders equity is equal to the sum of the net proceeds from all issuances of equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less any amount paid to repurchase common stock since inception, and excluding any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income). This amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in U.S. GAAP, and certain non-cash items after discussions between the Manager and the Companys independent directors and approval by a majority of the Companys independent directors.
The Manager has agreed to reduce (but not below zero) the management fee payable by the Company under the management agreement with respect to any equity investment the Company may make in the Invesco PPIP Fund managed by the Manager. The fee reduction occurs at the PPIP level.
For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred management fees of approximately $7.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively of which approximately $7.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, was accrued but had not been paid.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred management fees of approximately $17.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
Expense Reimbursement
Pursuant to the management agreement, the Company is required to reimburse the Manager for operating expenses related to the Company incurred by the Manager, including certain salary expenses and other expenses related to legal, accounting, due diligence and other services. The Companys reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation.
The Company incurred costs, originally paid by Invesco, of approximately $1.6 million and $4.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to approximately $629,000 and $2.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Approximately $1.3 million and $3.5 million was expensed for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $558,000 and $1.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Approximately $285,000 and $810,000 was charged against equity as a cost of raising capital for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $70,000 and $926,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
22
Termination Fee
A termination fee is due to the Manager upon termination of the management agreement by the Company equal to three times the sum of the average annual management fee earned by the Manager during the 24-month period prior to such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter.
Note 9 Shareholders Equity
Securities Convertible into Shares of Common Stock
The limited partner who holds units of the Operating Partnership (OP Units) has the right to cause the Operating Partnership to redeem their OP Units for cash equal to the market value of an equivalent number of shares of common stock, or at the Companys option, the Company may purchase their OP Units by issuing one share of common stock for each OP Unit redeemed. The Company has also adopted an equity incentive plan which includes the ability of the Company to grant securities convertible into the Companys common stock to the independent directors and the executive officers of the Company and the personnel of the Manager.
Registration Rights
The Company entered into a registration rights agreement with regard to the common stock and OP Units owned by the Manager and Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd., respectively, upon completion of the Companys IPO and any shares of common stock that the Manager may elect to receive under the management agreement or otherwise. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the Company has granted to the Manager and Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd., (i) unlimited demand registration rights to have the shares purchased by the Manager or granted to it in the future and the shares that the Company may issue upon redemption of the OP Units purchased by Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd. registered for resale, and (ii) in certain circumstances, the right to piggy-back these shares in registration statements the Company might file in connection with any future public offering so long as the Company retains the Manager under the management agreement.
Public Offerings
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 1,389,200 shares of common stock at an average price of $18.90 under the Companys Direct Stock Purchase Plan (DSPP) with total proceeds to the Company of approximately $26.1 million, net of issuance costs.
On August 23, 2011, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 20,000,000 shares of common stock at $18.37 per share. Net proceeds to the Company were $362.2 million, net of issuance costs of approximately $5.2 million.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company established the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan for grants of restricted common stock and other equity based awards to the independent directors and the executive officers of the Company and personnel of the Manager (the Incentive Plan). Under the Incentive Plan, a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock are currently reserved for issuance. Unless terminated earlier, the Incentive Plan will terminate in 2019, but will continue to govern the unexpired awards. The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $38,000 and approximately $19,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $105,000 and approximately $71,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued 1,722 and 915 shares, respectively, of restricted stock pursuant to the Incentive Plan to the Companys non-executive directors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued 4,617 and 2,670 shares, respectively, of restricted stock pursuant to the Incentive Plan to the Companys non-executive directors. The fair market value of the shares granted was determined by the closing stock market price on the date of the grant.
23
Compensation related to stock awards to officers and employees of the Manager are recorded at the estimated fair value of the award during the vesting period. The Company makes an upward or downward adjustment to compensation expense for the difference in the fair value at the date of grant and the date the award was earned. The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $8,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 related to awards to officers and employees of the Manager. The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $44,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to awards to officers and employees of the Manager.
Dividends
On September 8, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.80 per share of common stock. The dividend was paid on October 27, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 19, 2011.
Note 10 Earnings per Share
Earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is computed as follows:
$ in thousands | Three Months
Ended September 30, |
Nine Months
Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerator (Income) |
||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings |
||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
81,084 | 26,186 | 206,330 | 58,985 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Income allocated to non-controlling interest |
1,091 | 1,433 | 3,948 | 3,860 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dilutive net income available to shareholders |
82,175 | 27,619 | 210,278 | 62,845 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator (Weighted Average Shares) |
||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
Shares available to common shareholders |
103,028 | 26,047 | 76,311 | 21,552 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Awards |
19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | ||||||||||||
OP Units |
1,425 | 1,425 | 1,425 | 1,425 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dilutive Shares |
104,472 | 27,478 | 77,750 | 22,981 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Non-controlling Interest - Operating Partnership
Non-controlling interest represents the aggregate OP Units in the Operating Partnership held by limited partners (the Unit Holders). Income allocated to the non-controlling interest is based on the Unit Holders ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. The ownership percentage is determined by dividing the number of OP Units held by the Unit Holders by the total number of dilutive shares of common stock. The issuance of common stock (Share or Shares) or OP Units changes the percentage ownership of both the Unit Holders and the holders of common stock. Since an OP unit is generally redeemable for cash or Shares at the option of the Company, it is deemed to be equivalent to a Share. Therefore, such transactions are treated as capital transactions and result in an allocation between shareholders equity and non-controlling interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet to account for the change in the ownership of the underlying equity in the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, non-controlling interest related to the outstanding 1,425,000 OP units represented a 1.2% and 5.2% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively. Income allocated to the Operating Partnership non-controlling interest for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Income allocated to the Operating Partnership non-controlling interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $3.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, distributions paid to the non-controlling interest were $1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, distributions paid to the non-controlling interest were $4.2 million and $3.7 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, distributions payable to the non-controlling interest were approximately $1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
24
Note 12 Subsequent Events
The Company has reviewed subsequent events occurring through the date that these consolidation financial statements were issued, and determined that no subsequent events occurred that would require accrual or additional disclosure.
25
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, or this Report, we refer to Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries as we, us, our Company, or our, unless we specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise. We refer to our external manager, Invesco Advisers, Inc., as our Manager, and we refer to the indirect parent company of our Manager, Invesco Ltd. (NYSE:IVZ,) together with its consolidated subsidiaries (other than us), as Invesco.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 1 of this report, as well as the information contained in our most recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Forward-Looking Statements
We make forward-looking statements in this Report and other filings we make with the SEC within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the same. Forward-looking statements are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives. When we use the words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, plan, continue, intend, should, may or similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as will, may, could, should, and would, and any other statement that necessarily depends on future events, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed in the Companys forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| the impact of any deficiencies in foreclosure practices of third parties and related delays in the foreclosure process; |
| our business and investment strategy; |
| our investment portfolio; |
| our projected operating results; |
| actions and initiatives of the U.S. government, including the impact of the final agreement on the U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit; and changes to U.S. government policies, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) and our ability to respond to and comply with such actions, initiatives and changes; |
| our ability to obtain additional financing arrangements and the terms of such arrangements; |
| financing and advance rates for our target assets; |
| changes to our expected leverage; |
| general volatility of the securities markets in which we invest; |
| interest rate mismatches between our target assets and our borrowings used to fund such investments; |
| the adequacy of our cash flow from operations and borrowings to meet our short-term liquidity needs; |
26
| our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet any margin calls; |
| changes in interest rates and the market value of our target assets; |
| changes in prepayment rates on our target assets; |
| effects of hedging instruments on our target assets; |
| rates of default or decreased recovery rates on our target assets; |
| modifications to whole loans or loans underlying securities; |
| the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate volatility; |
| changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates, and similar matters and our ability to respond to such changes; |
| our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
| our ability to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act); |
| availability of investment opportunities in mortgage-related, real estate-related and other securities; |
| availability of U.S. government Agency guarantees with regard to payments of principal and interest on securities; |
| estimates relating to our ability to continue to make distributions to our shareholders; |
| availability of qualified personnel; |
| our understanding of our competition; |
| changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP); and |
| market trends in our industry, interest rates, real estate values, the debt securities markets or the general economy. |
These forward-looking statements are based upon information presently available to our management and are inherently subjective, uncertain and subject to change. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. We caution investors not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements and urge you to carefully consider the risks identified under the captions Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Report and our most recent Form 10-K and subsequent Forms 10-Q, which are available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
All written or oral forward-looking statements that we make, or that are attributable to us, are expressly qualified by this cautionary notice. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update the information in any public disclosure if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate, except as may otherwise be required by law.
27
Overview
We are a Maryland corporation primarily focused on investing in, financing and managing residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol IVR. We are externally managed and advised by Invesco Advisers, Inc., our Manager, which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. We elected to qualify to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income that we distribute currently to our shareholders as long as we maintain our qualification as a REIT. We operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act.
Our objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to our shareholders, primarily through dividends and secondarily through capital appreciation. To achieve this objective, we primarily invest in the following:
| Agency RMBS, which are residential mortgage-backed securities, for which a U.S. government Agency such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) or a federally chartered corporation such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) guarantees payments of principal and interest on the securities; |
| Non-Agency RMBS, which are RMBS that are not issued or guaranteed by a U.S. government agency or a federally chartered corporation; |
| CMBS, which are commercial mortgage-backed securities; and |
| Residential and commercial mortgage loans. |
We finance our investments in Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. We have also financed our investments in certain non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and residential and commercial mortgage loans by contributing capital to one or more of the legacy securities public-private investment funds (PPIFs) that receive financing under the U.S. governments Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), established and managed by our Manager (the Invesco PPIP Fund), which, in turn, invests in our target assets.
Recent Developments
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we issued 1,389,200 shares of common stock at an average price of $18.90 under the Companys Direct Stock Purchase Plan with total proceeds to us of approximately $26.1 million, net of issuance costs.
On September 8, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.80 per share of common stock. The dividend was paid on October 27, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 19, 2011.
On August 23, 2011, we completed a follow-on public offering of 20,000,000 shares of common stock at $18.37 per share. Net proceeds to us were approximately $362.2 million, net of issuance costs of approximately $5.2 million.
Factors Impacting Our Operating Results
Our operating results can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, and primarily depend on, among other things, the level of our net interest income, the market value of our assets and the supply of, and demand for, the target assets in which we invest. Our net interest income, which includes the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of purchase discounts, varies primarily as a result of changes in market interest rates and prepayment speeds, as measured by the constant prepayment rate (CPR) on our target assets. Interest rates and prepayment speeds vary according to the type of investment, conditions in the financial markets, competition and other factors, none of which can be predicted with any certainty.
28
Market Conditions
Beginning in the summer of 2007, significant adverse changes in financial market conditions resulted in a deleveraging of the entire global financial system. As part of this process, residential and commercial mortgage markets in the United States experienced a variety of difficulties, including loan defaults, credit losses and reduced liquidity. As a result, many lenders tightened their lending standards, reduced lending capacity, liquidated significant portfolios or exited the market altogether, and therefore, financing with attractive terms was generally unavailable. It remains unclear when the economy will fully recover. Further volatility and deterioration in the residential and commercial mortgage markets could adversely impact the performance and market value of our target assets and interest rate swaps.
The Dodd-Frank Act enacted on July 21, 2010, contains numerous provisions affecting the financial and mortgage industries, many of which may have an impact on our operating environment and the target assets in which we invest. Consequently, the Dodd-Frank Act may affect our cost of doing business, may limit our investment opportunities and may affect the competitive balance within our industry and market areas.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and the Department of the Treasury introduced the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) in early 2009. HARP provides borrowers, who may not otherwise qualify for refinancing because of declining home values or reduced access to mortgage insurance, the ability to refinance their mortgages into a lower interest rate and/or more stable mortgage product. On October 24, 2011, the FHFA announced a series of changes to the rules regarding the HARP with intent of increasing the number of borrowers eligible to refinance their mortgage under this program. While final guidance is not due until November 15, 2011, the FHFA announced the changes to the guidelines, related to loan-to-value, appraisals, and certain fees, among other things, subject to a variety of qualifications and the extension of the end date for the HARP until December 31, 2013. It does not change the time period which these loans were originated, maintaining the requirement that the loans must have been guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or before May 31, 2009. We do not expect the current HARP or future modifications to have a material impact on our results of operations in future periods.
Investment Activities
As of September 30, 2011, 50.8% of our equity was invested in Agency RMBS, 29.9% in non-Agency RMBS, 13.6% in CMBS, and 5.7% in the Invesco PPIP Fund and other investments in unconsolidated ventures. We use leverage on our target assets to achieve our return objectives. For our total investment portfolio, we focus on securities we believe provide attractive returns when levered approximately 3 to 7 times. The leverage on classes of assets may periodically exceed the stated ranges as we adjust our borrowings to obtain the best available source and minimize total interest expense, while maintaining our overall portfolio leverage guidelines.
As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately $6.2 billion in 30-year fixed rate securities that offered higher coupons and call protection based on the collateral attributes. We balanced this with approximately $2.5 billion in 15-year fixed rate securities, approximately $1.3 billion in hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) and approximately $96.7 million in ARMs we believe to have similar durations based on prepayment speeds. As of September 30, 2011, we had purchased approximately $2.2 billion non-Agency RMBS fixed rate mortgages and $418.3 million non-Agency RMBS ARMs.
Initially, we focused on CMBS that could be financed under the TALF. In November 2010, the Company exercised its right to prepay the TALF loans secured by CMBS. The purpose for the prepayment was to obtain lower borrowing costs. The Company obtained additional advances under existing repurchase agreement financing arrangements. As of September 30, 2011, we owned approximately $1.4 billion in CMBS and financed $1.0 billion in repurchase agreements. In addition, as of September 30, 2011, we had purchased approximately $143.4 million in CMOs.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we purchased approximately $3.5 billion of mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these purchases as of September 30, 2011 is 4.40%.
29
Investment Portfolio
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2011:
$ in thousands | Principal Balance |
Unamortized Premium (Discount) |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) |
Fair Value |
Net Weighted Average Coupon (1) |
Average Yield (2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate |
2,360,188 | 128,782 | 2,488,970 | 43,399 | 2,532,369 | 4.33 | % | 3.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
30 year fixed-rate |
5,701,102 | 400,866 | 6,101,968 | 110,900 | 6,212,868 | 5.17 | % | 3.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ARM |
92,785 | 1,850 | 94,635 | 2,087 | 96,722 | 3.53 | % | 3.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Hybrid ARM |
1,267,544 | 28,045 | 1,295,589 | 23,359 | 1,318,948 | 3.31 | % | 2.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Agency |
9,421,619 | 559,543 | 9,981,162 | 179,745 | 10,160,907 | 4.69 | % | 3.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
MBS-CMO |
629,502 | (487,871 | ) | 141,631 | 1,769 | 143,400 | 3.30 | % | 6.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS(3) |
3,061,712 | (316,705 | ) | 2,745,007 | (79,399 | ) | 2,665,608 | 5.84 | % | 6.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||
CMBS |
1,492,384 | (21,422 | ) | 1,470,962 | (103,926 | ) | 1,367,036 | 5.48 | % | 5.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
14,605,217 | (266,455 | ) | 14,338,762 | (1,811 | ) | 14,336,951 | 4.70 | % | 4.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Net weighted average coupon (WAC) is presented net of servicing and other fees. |
(2) | Average yield incorporates future prepayment and loss assumptions. |
(3) | The non-Agency RMBS held by the Company is 84.3% fixed rate and 15.7% floating rate, based on fair value. |
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of our investment portfolio, at fair value, according to their estimated weighted average life classifications as of September 30, 2011:
$ in thousands |
September 30, 2011 | |||
Less than one year |
82,942 | |||
Greater than one year and less than five years |
12,098,705 | |||
Greater than or equal to five years |
2,155,304 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
14,336,951 | |||
|
|
The following table presents certain information about the carrying value of our available for sale MBS at September 30, 2011:
$ in thousands | September 30, 2011 | |||
Principal balance |
14,605,217 | |||
Unamortized premium |
589,517 | |||
Unamortized discount |
(855,972 | ) | ||
Gross unrealized gains |
221,213 | |||
Gross unrealized losses |
(223,024 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Fair value |
14,336,951 | |||
|
|
The following table summarizes our non-Agency RMBS portfolio by asset type as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively:
$ in thousands | September 30, 2011 | % of Non-Agency | June 30, 2011 | % of Non-Agency | ||||||||||||
Re-REMIC Senior |
1,640,916 | 61.6 | % | 1,074,303 | 46.3 | % | ||||||||||
Prime |
708,575 | 26.6 | % | 820,792 | 35.4 | % | ||||||||||
Alt-A |
304,551 | 11.4 | % | 412,640 | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||
Subprime |
11,566 | 0.4 | % | 12,686 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Non-Agency |
2,665,608 | 100.0 | % | 2,320,421 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A re-securitization of a real estate mortgage investment conduit (re-REMIC) is a re-securitization of an existing bond or bonds in which the bonds are transferred to a securitization trust. These transactions will create a subordinated interest in the underlying bond which will absorb any losses prior to the senior tranche.
30
Prime mortgage loans are mortgage loans that generally require borrower credit histories, debt-to-income ratios and loan-to-value ratios similar to those dictated by U.S. government agency underwriting guidelines, though in certain cases they may not meet the same income documentation or other requirements.
Alt-A mortgage loans are mortgage loans made to borrowers whose qualifying mortgage characteristics do not conform to U.S. government agency underwriting guidelines, but whose borrower characteristics may conform. Generally, Alt-A mortgage loans allow homeowners to qualify for a mortgage loan with reduced or alternative forms of documentation. The credit quality of Alt-A borrowers generally exceeds the credit quality of subprime borrowers.
Subprime mortgage loans are loans that do not conform to U.S. government agency underwriting guidelines. Subprime borrowers generally have imperfect or impaired credit histories and/or low credit scores.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company increased the portfolio of non-Agency RMBS by $345.2 million and adjusted its non-Agency RMBS asset allocation. With the completion of the August follow-on offering, the Company increased the percentage of its non-Agency RMBS portfolio allocated to re-REMIC Senior RMBS to 61.6% from 46.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.
Financing and Other Liabilities. We enter into repurchase agreements to finance the majority of our Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS. These agreements are secured by our Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS and bear interest at rates that have historically moved in close relationship to the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR). As of September 30, 2011, we had entered into repurchase agreements totalling $12.2 billion. We also committed to invest up to $100.0 million in the Invesco PPIP Fund, which, in turn, invests in our target assets. As of September 30, 2011, approximately $95.3 million of our commitment to the Invesco PPIP Fund has been called. In addition, we committed to invest up to $40.0 million in IMRF Loan Portfolio Member LLC. As of September 30, 2011, our commitment was fully funded.
The Company records the liability for mortgage-backed securities purchased for which settlement has not taken place as an investment related payable. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had investment related payables of $640.8 million and $372.3 million, respectively, of which no items were outstanding greater than thirty days. The change in balance was primarily due to an increase in mortgage-backed security purchases and unsettled repurchase agreements at quarter end related to our follow-on common stock issuance on August 23, 2011.
Hedging Instruments. We generally hedge as much of our interest rate risk as we deem prudent in light of market conditions. No assurance can be given that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Our investment policies do not contain specific requirements as to the percentages or amount of interest rate risk that we are required to hedge.
Interest rate hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:
| available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought; |
| the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability; |
| the party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay; |
| the credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction; and |
| the value of derivatives used for hedging may be adjusted from time to time in accordance with accounting rules to reflect changes in fair value. Downward adjustments or mark-to-market losses would reduce our shareholders equity. |
31
As of September 30, 2011, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements designed to mitigate the effects of increases in interest rates under a portion of our repurchase agreements. These swap agreements provide for fixed interest rates indexed off of one-month LIBOR and effectively fix the floating interest rates on $6.9 billion of borrowings under our repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2011. We intend to continue to add interest rate hedge positions according to our hedging strategy.
The following table summarizes our hedging activity as of September 30, 2011:
Counterparty |
Notional | Maturity Date | Fixed Interest Rate in Contract |
|||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
175,000 | 8/5/2012 | 2.07 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
100,000 | 5/24/2013 | 1.83 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
200,000 | 6/15/2013 | 1.73 | % | ||||||||
SunTrust Bank |
100,000 | 7/15/2014 | 2.79 | % | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
200,000 | 1/15/2015 | 1.08 | % | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
250,000 | 2/15/2015 | 1.14 | % | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International |
100,000 | 2/24/2015 | 3.26 | % | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International |
100,000 | 3/24/2015 | 2.76 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
100,000 | 7/15/2015 | 2.85 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
50,000 | 7/15/2015 | 2.44 | % | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
300,000 | 1/24/2016 | 2.12 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
300,000 | 1/24/2016 | 2.13 | % | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
300,000 | 4/5/2016 | 2.48 | % | ||||||||
Citibank, N.A. |
300,000 | 4/15/2016 | 1.67 | % | ||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon |
500,000 | 4/15/2016 | 2.24 | % | ||||||||
Credit Suisse International |
500,000 | 4/15/2016 | 2.27 | % | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
500,000 | 5/16/2016 | 2.31 | % | ||||||||
Goldman Sachs Bank USA |
500,000 | 5/24/2016 | 2.34 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
250,000 | 6/15/2016 | 2.67 | % | ||||||||
Goldman Sachs Bank USA |
250,000 | 6/15/2016 | 2.67 | % | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
500,000 | 6/24/2016 | 2.51 | % | ||||||||
Citibank, N.A. |
500,000 | 10/15/2016 | 1.93 | % | ||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
150,000 | 2/5/2018 | 2.90 | % | ||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
100,000 | 4/5/2018 | 3.10 | % | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
200,000 | 5/15/2018 | 2.93 | % | ||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
200,000 | 3/15/2021 | 3.14 | % | ||||||||
Citibank, N.A. |
200,000 | 5/25/2021 | 2.83 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
6,925,000 | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
Approximately $500.0 million of the total $6.9 billion of the swap notional amount on September 30, 2011 were forward-starting interest rate swaps with effective dates beyond September 30, 2011.
With the recent Federal Reserve action to contain short-term rates low through 2013, we have added duration assets from the August 2011 follow-on public offering and have not added any additional interest rate swaps. At September 30, 2011, the average maturity of our interest rate swaps is 4.7 years compared to 4.9 years at June 30, 2011.
Credit Default Swap Agreement
We entered into a credit default swap (CDS) on December 31, 2010 with a $150.0 million notional balance and a fair value of $0. Under this CDS, we sold protection (and receive premium payments of 3% on the outstanding notional amount) on a specific pool of non-Agency RMBS that exceed a specified loss limit of 25%. Our maximum exposure is the unpaid principal balance of the underlying RMBS that exceeds the specified loss limit. The CDS is not designated as a hedging instrument therefore the unrealized loss of $105,000 and an unrealized gain of $1.6 million is included in the gain on credit default swap in the statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
32
At September 30, 2011, the open CDS sold by us is summarized as follows:
$ in thousand |
September 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Fair value amount |
1,580 | | ||||||
Notional amount |
120,647 | 149,964 | ||||||
Maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments |
90,486 | 112,500 | ||||||
Recourse provisions with third parties |
| | ||||||
Collateral held by counterparty |
18,531 | |
Book Value per Share
Our book value per share was $16.47 and $20.49 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, on a fully diluted basis, after giving effect to our units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership, which may be converted to common shares at the sole election of the Company. The decline in our book value was primarily due to the change in valuation of our investment portfolio and our interest rate hedges that is recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on our balance sheet. The value of our assets and liabilities change daily based on market conditions. Refer to Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks for interest rate risk and its impact on fair value.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions that involve the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and assessments that could affect our reported assets and liabilities, as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our consolidated financial statements are based are reasonable at the time made and based upon information available to us at that time. We rely upon independent pricing of our assets at each quarters end to arrive at what we believe to be reasonable estimates of fair market value. The complete listing of our Critical Accounting Policies was disclosed in our 2010 annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2011, and there have been no material changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as disclosed therein.
Results of Operations
The table below presents certain information from our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three Months
ended September 30, |
Nine Months
ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
$ in thousands, except per share data | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
138,291 | 36,067 | 315,808 | 83,284 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
50,452 | 8,873 | 100,237 | 18,904 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net interest income |
87,839 | 27,194 | 215,571 | 64,380 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other income |
3,049 | 3,349 | 15,174 | 6,398 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Management fee related party |
7,884 | 2,039 | 17,612 | 5,094 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
829 | 885 | 2,855 | 2,839 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total expenses |
8,713 | 2,924 | 20,467 | 7,933 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
82,175 | 27,619 | 210,278 | 62,845 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
1,091 | 1,433 | 3,948 | 3,860 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
81,084 | 26,186 | 206,330 | 58,985 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders (basic/diluted) |
0.79 | 1.01 | 2.70 | 2.74 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
0.80 | 1.00 | 2.77 | 2.52 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average number of shares of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
103,028 | 26,047 | 76,311 | 21,552 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
104,472 | 27,478 | 77,750 | 22,981 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents certain information for our portfolio for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three Months ended | Nine Months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
$ in thousands | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Average Balances*: |
||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate, at fair value (Including CMOs) |
2,483,276 | 683,692 | 2,185,511 | 522,204 | ||||||||||||
30 year fixed-rate, at fair value |
5,594,412 | 701,684 | 4,025,616 | 544,444 | ||||||||||||
ARM, at fair value |
111,690 | 8,280 | 81,816 | 8,911 | ||||||||||||
Hybrid ARM, at fair value |
1,315,546 | 42,644 | 901,972 | 96,340 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS, at fair value |
2,505,260 | 732,920 | 1,893,772 | 557,729 | ||||||||||||
CMBS, at fair value |
1,314,045 | 211,815 | 904,505 | 200,931 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average MBS portfolio |
13,324,229 | 2,381,035 | 9,993,192 | 1,930,559 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average Portfolio Yields (1): |
||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS: |
||||||||||||||||
15 year fixed-rate, (Including CMOs) |
2.86 | % | 3.18 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.18 | % | ||||||||
30 year fixed-rate |
3.66 | % | 4.17 | % | 3.59 | % | 3.82 | % | ||||||||
ARM |
3.11 | % | 2.56 | % | 3.01 | % | 2.45 | % | ||||||||
Hybrid ARM |
2.57 | % | 2.04 | % | 2.60 | % | 0.84 | % | ||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS |
6.63 | % | 11.19 | % | 7.14 | % | 11.27 | % | ||||||||
CMBS |
5.67 | % | 4.77 | % | 5.31 | % | 4.84 | % | ||||||||
Average MBS portfolio |
4.15 | % | 6.06 | % | 4.21 | % | 5.75 | % | ||||||||
Average Borrowings*: |
||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS |
8,399,111 | 1,295,270 | 6,468,159 | 1,067,201 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS |
1,998,255 | 409,786 | 1,383,534 | 276,797 | ||||||||||||
CMBS |
1,069,243 | 157,870 | 737,356 | 154,112 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
11,466,609 | 1,862,926 | 8,589,049 | 1,498,110 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average Cost of Funds (2): |
||||||||||||||||
Agency RMBS |
0.25 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS |
1.39 | % | 1.76 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.60 | % | ||||||||
CMBS |
1.35 | % | 3.52 | % | 1.28 | % | 3.38 | % | ||||||||
Unhedged cost of funds |
0.55 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.83 | % | ||||||||
Hedged cost of funds |
1.76 | % | 1.91 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.68 | % | ||||||||
Average Equity (3): |
1,847,320 | 560,437 | 1,526,080 | 478,853 | ||||||||||||
Average debt/equity ratio (average during period) |
6.21 | x | 3.32 | x | 5.63 | x | 3.13 | x | ||||||||
Debt/equity ratio (as of period end) |
6.33 | x | 3.41 | x | 6.33 | x | 3.41 | x |
* | Average amounts for each period are based on weighted month end balances, all percentages are annualized. |
(1) | Average portfolio yield for the period was calculated by dividing interest income, including amortization of premiums and discounts, by our average of the investment balance at fair value. |
(2) | Average cost of funds is calculated by dividing interest expense, by our average borrowings. |
(3) | Average equity is calculated based on a weighted balance basis. |
34
Net Income Summary
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, our net income was $82.2 million or $0.79 basic and diluted income per weighted average share available to common shareholders compared to $27.6 million or $1.01 basic and diluted income per weighted average share available to common shareholders for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our net income was $210.3 million or $2.70 basic and diluted income per weighted average share available to common shareholders compared to $62.8 million or $2.74 basic and diluted income per weighted average share available to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The increase to net income for the three and nine month periods is primarily attributable to the growth in our investment portfolio resulting from our follow-on common stock offerings. The average MBS portfolio increased approximately $10.9 million and $8.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Since September 30, 2010, we completed five follow-on common stock offerings raising approximately $1.8 billion in equity.
Interest Income and Average Earning Asset Yield
Our primary source of income is interest earned on our investment portfolio. We had average earning assets of $13.3 billion and $2.4 billion and earned interest income of $138.3 million and $36.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The yield on our average investment portfolio was 4.15% and 6.06% for the respective periods. The change in our average assets and the portfolio yield was primarily the result of the change in our portfolio composition as we have allocated a higher amount of equity to Agency RMBS at lower yields and higher leverage.
We had average earning assets of $10.0 billion and $1.9 billion and earned interest income of $315.8 million and $83.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The yield on our average investment portfolio was 4.21% and 5.75% for the respective periods. The change in our average assets and the portfolio yield was primarily the result of the change in our portfolio composition as we have allocated a higher amount of equity to Agency RMBS at lower yields and higher leverage.
Our interest income is subject to interest rate risk. Refer to Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for more information relating to interest rate risk and its impact on our operating results.
The CPR of our portfolio impacts the amount of premium and discount on the purchase of securities that is recognized into income. Our Agency and non-Agency RMBS had a weighted average CPR of 8.7 and 8.1 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The table below shows the three month CPR for our RMBS compared to bonds with similar characteristics (Cohorts):
September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Company | Cohort | Company | Cohort | |||||||||||||
15 year Agency RMBS |
9.1 | 20.5 | 7.7 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||
30 year Agency RMBS |
9.8 | 16.2 | 9.2 | 13.0 | ||||||||||||
Agency Hybrid ARM RMBS |
14.9 | NA | 5.6 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency RMBS |
8.1 | NA | 11.5 | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Overall |
8.7 | NA | 8.1 | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Interest Expense and the Cost of Funds
Our largest expense is the interest expense on borrowed funds. We had average borrowed funds of $11.5 billion and $1.9 billion and total interest expense of $50.5 million and $8.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in average borrowed funds and interest expense was primarily the result of increasing the size of our investment portfolio.
We had average borrowed funds of $8.6 billion and $1.5 billion and total interest expense of $100.2 million and $18.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in average borrowed funds and interest expense was primarily the result of increasing the size of our investment portfolio and hedging costs from additional interest rate swaps.
Our average cost of funds was 1.76% and 1.91% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Since a substantial portion of our repurchase agreements are short term, changes in market rates are directly reflected in our interest expense. Interest expense includes borrowing costs, as well as any hedging costs.
Our average cost of funds was 1.56% and 1.68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Since a substantial portion of our repurchase agreements are short term, changes in market rates are directly reflected in our interest expense. Interest expense includes borrowing costs, as well as any hedging costs.
Net Interest Income
Our net interest income, which equals interest income less interest expense, totaled $87.8 million and $27.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our net interest rate margin, which equals the yield on our average assets for the period less the average cost of funds for the period, was 2.39% and 4.15% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of increasing our investment portfolio while the decrease in our net interest margin was a direct result of our change in asset mix and the impact of additional cost of funds related to our interest rate hedges.
Our net interest income totaled $215.6 million and $64.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our net interest rate margin was 2.65% and 4.07% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of increasing our investment portfolio while the decrease in our net interest margin was a direct result of our change in asset mix between Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS. Refer to the average balance table in the Results of Operations section above for changes in average portfolio balance and asset mix.
Other Income
As part of our credit process, all of our MBS are reviewed on a monthly basis to determine if they continue to meet our risk and return targets. This process involves looking at changing market assumptions and the impact those assumptions will have on the individual securities. As a result of our change in market assumptions, we sold securities and recognized net gain of approximately $3.6 million and a net loss of $311,000 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
As a result of our change in market assumptions, we sold securities and recognized net gain of approximately $8.4 million and $1.1 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized equity in earnings of approximately $823,000 and $2.0 million, respectively, and unrealized loss on the change in fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $1.8 million and unrealized income on the change in fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $1.8 million, respectively. The net decrease in equity in earnings is attributed to a reduction to the underlying investments through dispositions by the PPIP Fund, and the net unrealized loss on the change in fair value was primarily the result of a decrease in the fair value of the remaining underlying investments held by the PPIP Fund.
36
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized equity in earnings of approximately $6.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and unrealized loss on the change in fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $3.7 million and unrealized income on the change in fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $2.1 million, respectively. The net earnings from the unconsolidated limited partnership were primarily the result of a gain realized offset by a decrease in the fair value of the PPIP Fund.
For the three months ended September 30, 2011 we recognized income of $858,000 on our investment in a CDS of which $105,000 is an unrealized loss based on change in the fair market value of the CDS and $1.0 million represents premium payments we receive for providing protection.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 we recognized income of $4.6 million on our investment in a CDS of which $1.6 million is an unrealized gain based on change in the fair market value of the CDS and $3.0 million represents premium payments we receive for providing protection.
Expenses
We incurred management fees of $7.9 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively, which are payable to our Manager under our management agreement. The increase in management fees is attributable to an increase in shareholders equity resulting from our follow-on common stock offerings in 2010 and 2011. This management fee and the relationship between the Company and the Manager are discussed further in our discussion of related party relationships.
We incurred management fees of $17.6 million and $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively, which are payable to our Manager under our management agreement. The increase in management fees is attributable to an increase in shareholders equity resulting from our follow-on common stock offerings in 2010 and 2011. This management fee and the relationship between the Company and the Manager are discussed further in our discussion of related party relationships.
Our general and administrative expenses include the estimated salary and bonus of our Controller, amortization of equity based compensation related to anticipated quarterly grants of our stock to our independent directors, payable subsequent to each calendar quarter, cash-based payments to our independent directors, derivative transaction fees, filing fees, and other miscellaneous general and administrative costs. These costs are generally fixed in nature and are generally not dependent on the size of the Company.
Our general and administrative expenses were approximately $829,000 and $885,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Our general and administrative expenses were approximately $2.9 million and $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Net Income and Return on Average Equity
Our net income was $82.2 million and $27.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our annualized return on average equity was 17.79% and 19.71% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net income was primarily the result of an increase in our net interest income following our portfolio growth. The decrease in return on average equity was primarily the result of a decrease in asset yields of our investment portfolio.
37
Our net income was $210.3 million and $62.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our annualized return on average equity was 18.37% and 17.50% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net income and return on average equity was primarily the result of an increase in our net interest income following our portfolio growth.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to pay dividends, fund investments, repayment of borrowings and other general business needs. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of the net proceeds from our common equity offerings, net cash provided by operating activities, cash from repurchase agreements and other financing arrangements and future issuances of equity and/or debt securities.
We currently believe that we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources available for the acquisition of additional investments, repayments on borrowings and the payment of cash dividends as required for continued qualification as a REIT. We generally maintain liquidity to pay down borrowings under repurchase arrangements to reduce borrowing costs and otherwise efficiently manage our long-term investment capital. Because the level of these borrowings can be adjusted on a daily basis, the level of cash and cash equivalents carried on our balance sheet is significantly less important than our potential liquidity available under borrowing arrangements.
We held cash and cash equivalents of approximately $56.9 million and $20.4 million at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents increased due to normal fluctuations in cash balances related to the timing of principal and interest payments, repayments of debt, and asset purchases and sales.
Our operating activities provided net cash of approximately $202.4 million and $42.6 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cash provided by operating activities increased due to the increase in net interest income earned by the portfolio which resulted from the increase in average interest earning assets of $10.0 billion in investments at September 30, 2011 as compared to $1.9 billion at September 30, 2010.
Our investing activities used net cash of $8.7 billion and $1.6 billion for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 we utilized cash to purchase $10.7 billion in securities which were offset by proceeds from asset sales of $1.2 billion and principal payments of $936.4 million. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 we utilized cash to purchase $2.0 billion in securities and sold $216.1 million and received principal payments of $265.9 million. The increase in principal payments resulted from the larger portfolio at September 30, 2011 as compared to 2010.
Our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 consisted of net proceeds from our March, June and August 2011 follow-on public offerings in which we raised approximately $1.3 billion and from our repurchase agreements.
Our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 consisted of net proceeds from our January and May 2010 follow-on public offerings in which we raised approximately $342.0 million and from our repurchase agreements.
38
The table below shows the allocation of our equity and debt-to-equity ratio as of September 30, 2011. The leverage on each class of assets may periodically exceed the stated ranges as we adjust our borrowings to obtain the best available source and minimize total interest expense while maintaining our overall portfolio leverage guidelines.
$ in thousands |
Agency | Non-Agency | CMBS | Unconsolidated Ventures |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
9,044,073 | 2,114,019 | 1,023,753 | | 12,181,845 | |||||||||||||||
Equity allocation |
976,692 | 574,549 | 261,635 | 110,907 | 1,923,783 | |||||||||||||||
Debt / Equity Ratio |
9.3 | 3.7 | 3.9 | | 6.3 | |||||||||||||||
% of Total Equity |
50.8 | % | 29.9 | % | 13.6 | % | 5.7 | % | 100.0 | % |
We enter into repurchase agreements with various counterparties to fund our purchases of MBS. The following table summarizes our total borrowings by type of investment as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
$ in thousands |
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Amount Outstanding |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Amount Outstanding |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
|||||||||||||
Agency RMBS |
9,044,073 | 0.29 | % | 3,483,440 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||||
Non-Agency RBS |
2,114,019 | 1.51 | % | 459,979 | 1.76 | % | ||||||||||
CMBS |
1,023,753 | 1.44 | % | 401,240 | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
12,181,845 | 0.60 | % | 4,344,659 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, the weighted average margin requirement, or the percentage amount by which the collateral value must exceed the loan amount, which we also refer to as the haircut, under our repurchase agreements for Agency RMBS was approximately 4.78% (weighted by borrowing amount), under our repurchase agreements for non-Agency RMBS was approximately 19.20% and under our repurchase agreements for CMBS was approximately 18.97%. Across our repurchase facilities for Agency RMBS, the haircuts range from a low of 3% to a high of 7%, for non-Agency RMBS range from a low of 10% to a high of 40% and for CMBS range from a low of 12% to a high of 30%. Our hedged cost of funds was approximately 1.56% and 0.89% as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Declines in the value of our securities portfolio can trigger margin calls by our lenders under our repurchase agreements. An event of default or termination event would give some of our counterparties the option to terminate all repurchase transactions existing with us and require any amount due by us to the counterparties to be payable immediately.]
As discussed above under Market Conditions, the residential mortgage market in the United States has experienced difficult economic conditions including:
| increased volatility of many financial assets, including agency securities and other high-quality RMBS assets, due to potential security liquidations; |
| increased volatility and deterioration in the broader residential mortgage and RMBS markets; and |
| significant disruption in financing of RMBS. |
If these conditions persist, then our lenders may be forced to exit the repurchase market, become insolvent or further tighten lending standards or increase the amount of required equity capital or haircut, any of which could make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain financing. In addition, because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are in conservatorship of the U.S. government, if the U.S.s credit rating is downgraded, it may impact the credit risk associated with Agency RMBS and other assets, and, therefore, decrease the value of the Agency RMBS, non-Agency RBMS and CMBS in our portfolio, which could cause our repurchase counterparties to make margin calls on our borrowings and swaps, if our collateral is insufficient to cover the debt secured by our assets.
Effective as of August 27, 2010, we implemented a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (the DRIP), pursuant to which we registered and reserved for issuance 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. Under the terms of the DRIP, shareholders who participate in the DRIP may purchase shares of our common stock directly from us, in cash investments up to $10,000. At our sole discretion, we may accept optional cash investments in
39
excess of $10,000 per month, which may qualify for a discount from the market price of 0% to 3%. The DRIP participants may also automatically reinvest all or a portion of their dividends for additional shares of our stock. We expect to use the proceeds from any dividend reinvestments or stock purchases for general corporate purposes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we issued a total of 6,201 common shares pursuant to the plan.
Effects of Margin Requirements, Leverage and Credit Spreads
Our securities have values that fluctuate according to market conditions and, as discussed above, the market value of our securities will decrease as prevailing interest rates or credit spreads increase. When the value of the securities pledged to secure a repurchase loan decreases to the point where the positive difference between the collateral value and the loan amount is less than the haircut, our lenders may issue a margin call, which means that the lender will require us to pay the margin call in cash or pledge additional collateral to meet that margin call. Under our repurchase facilities, our lenders have full discretion to determine the value of the securities we pledge to them. Most of our lenders will value securities based on recent trades in the market. Lenders also issue margin calls as the published current principal balance factors change on the pool of mortgages underlying the securities pledged as collateral when scheduled and unscheduled paydowns are announced monthly.
We experience margin calls in the ordinary course of our business. In seeking to effectively manage the margin requirements established by our lenders, we maintain a position of cash and unpledged securities. We refer to this position as our liquidity. The level of liquidity we have available to meet margin calls is directly affected by our leverage levels, our haircuts and the price changes on our securities. If interest rates increase as a result of a yield curve shift or for another reason or if credit spreads widen, then the prices of our collateral (and our unpledged assets that constitute our liquidity) will decline, we will experience margin calls, and we will use our liquidity to meet the margin calls. There can be no assurance that we will maintain sufficient levels of liquidity to meet any margin calls. If our haircuts increase, our liquidity will proportionately decrease. In addition, if we increase our borrowings, our liquidity will decrease by the amount of additional haircut on the increased level of indebtedness.
We intend to maintain a level of liquidity in relation to our assets that enables us to meet reasonably anticipated margin calls but that also allows us to be substantially invested in securities. We may misjudge the appropriate amount of our liquidity by maintaining excessive liquidity, which would lower our investment returns, or by maintaining insufficient liquidity, which would force us to liquidate assets into unfavorable market conditions and harm our results of operations and financial condition.
Forward-Looking Statements Regarding Liquidity
Based upon our current portfolio, leverage rate and available borrowing arrangements, we believe that the net proceeds of our common equity offerings, combined with cash flow from operations and available borrowing capacity, will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated short-term (one year or less) liquidity requirements to fund our investment activities, pay fees under our management agreement, fund our distributions to shareholders and for other general corporate expenses.
Our ability to meet our long-term (greater than one year) liquidity and capital resource requirements will be subject to obtaining additional debt financing and equity capital. We may increase our capital resources by obtaining long-term credit facilities or through public or private offerings of equity or debt securities, possibly including classes of preferred stock, common stock, and senior or subordinated notes. Such financing will depend on market conditions for capital raises and our ability to invest such offering proceeds. If we are unable to renew, replace or expand our sources of financing on substantially similar terms, it may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Contractual Obligations
On July 1, 2009, we entered into an agreement with our Manager pursuant to which our Manager is entitled to receive a management fee and the reimbursement of certain expenses, which was amended on May 24, 2011. The management fee will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in an amount equal to 1.50% of our shareholders equity, per annum, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears. Our Manager uses the proceeds from its management fee in part to pay compensation to its officers and personnel who, notwithstanding that certain of
40
those individuals are also our officers, receive no cash compensation directly from us. We are required to reimburse our Manager for operating expenses related to us incurred by our Manager, including certain salary expenses and other expenses relating to legal, accounting, due diligence and other services. Expense reimbursements to our Manager are made in cash on a monthly basis following the end of each month. Our reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation. Refer to Note 8 Related Party Transactions for details of our reimbursements to our Manager.
Contractual Commitments
As of September 30, 2011, we had the following contractual commitments and commercial obligations:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ in thousands | Total | Less than 1 year |
1-3 years | 3-5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
12,181,845 | 12,181,845 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Invesco PPIP Fund investment |
4,675 |