UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ¨
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant x
Check the appropriate box:
| ¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement. |
| ¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). |
| ¨ | Definitive Proxy Statement. |
| ¨ | Definitive Additional Materials. |
| x | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12. |
NRG ENERGY, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
EXELON CORPORATION
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| x | No fee required. |
| ¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction: |
| (5) | Total fee paid: |
| ¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| ¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| (3) | Filing Party: |
| (4) | Date Filed: |
On February 10, 2009, Exelon began using the following slides in discussions with investors:
 Exelon + NRG: Committed, Moving Forward Investor Meetings February 2009 |
 Important Information This presentation relates to the offer (the “Offer”) by Exelon Corporation (“Exelon”) through its direct wholly-owned subsidiary, Exelon Xchange Corporation (“Xchange”), to exchange each issued and outstanding share of common stock (the “NRG shares”) of NRG Energy, Inc. (“NRG”) for 0.485 of a share of Exelon common stock. This presentation is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to exchange, or a solicitation of an offer to exchange, NRG shares, nor is it a substitute for the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO or the Prospectus/Offer to Exchange included in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333- 155278) (including the Letter of Transmittal and related documents and as amended from time to time, the “Exchange Offer Documents”) previously filed by Exelon and Xchange with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Offer is made only through the Exchange Offer Documents. Investors and security holders are urged to read these documents and other relevant materials as they become available, because they will contain important information. Exelon expects to file a proxy statement on Schedule 14A and other relevant documents with the SEC in connection with the solicitation of proxies (the “NRG Meeting Proxy Statement”) for the 2009 annual meeting of NRG stockholders (the “NRG Meeting”). Exelon will also file a proxy statement on Schedule 14A and other relevant documents with the SEC in connection with its solicitation of proxies for a meeting of Exelon shareholders (the “Exelon Meeting”) to be called in order to approve the issuance of shares of Exelon common stock pursuant to the Offer (the “Exelon Meeting Proxy Statement”). Investors and security holders are urged to read the NRG Meeting Proxy Statement and the Exelon Meeting Proxy Statement and other relevant materials as they become available, because they will contain important information. Investors and security holders can obtain copies of the materials described above (and all other related documents filed with the SEC) at no charge on the SEC’s website: www.sec.gov. Copies can also be obtained at no charge by directing a request for such materials to Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10022, toll free at 1-877-750-9501. Investors and security holders may also read and copy any reports, statements and other information filed by Exelon, Xchange or NRG with the SEC, at the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC- 0330 or visit the SEC’s website for further information on its public reference room. Exelon, Xchange and the individuals to be nominated by Exelon for election to NRG’s Board of Directors will be participants in the solicitation of proxies from NRG stockholders for the NRG Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Exelon and Xchange will be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Exelon shareholders for the Exelon Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. In addition, certain directors and executive officers of Exelon and Xchange may solicit proxies for the Exelon Meeting and the NRG Meeting. Information about Exelon and Exelon’s directors and executive officers is available in Exelon’s proxy statement, dated March 20, 2008, filed with the SEC in connection with Exelon’s 2008 annual meeting of shareholders. Information about Xchange and Xchange’s directors and executive officers is available in Schedule II to the Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. Information about any other participants will be included in the NRG Meeting Proxy Statement or the Exelon Meeting Proxy Statement, as applicable. 2 |
 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, for example, statements regarding benefits of the proposed merger, integration plans and expected synergies. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include Exelon’s ability to achieve the synergies contemplated by the proposed transaction, Exelon’s ability to promptly and effectively integrate the businesses of NRG and Exelon, and the timing to consummate the proposed transaction and obtain required regulatory approvals as well as those discussed in (1) Exelon’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K in (a) ITEM 1A. Risk Factors, (b) ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and (c) ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data: Note 18; (2) Exelon’s preliminary prospectus/offer to exchange that is contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333-155278) that Exelon has filed with the SEC in connection with the offer; and (3) other factors discussed in Exelon’s filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this filing. Exelon does not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revision to its forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing, except as required by law. Statements made in connection with the exchange offer are not subject to the safe harbor protections provided to forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All information in this presentation concerning NRG, including its business, operations, and financial results, was obtained from public sources. While Exelon has no knowledge that any such information is inaccurate or incomplete, Exelon has not had the opportunity to verify any of that information. 3 |
 Agenda
for Today’s Discussion • Full and Fair Offer • Capturing the Value of Growth Opportunities • Committed To Execution 4 |
 1. Full and Fair Offer
|
 Full
and Fair Offer • On November 12 th , Exelon launched an exchange offer for all of the outstanding shares of NRG common stock • Filed Form S-4 with the SEC • Fixed exchange ratio of 0.485 Exelon share for each NRG common share • Represents a 37% premium to the October 17 th NRG closing price 6 |
 7 Value Created for NRG Shareholders 1. IPP index includes CPN, DYN, MIR and RRI 2. Based upon a ~95% correlation between NRG and the IPP Index for 12 months prior to October 17, 2008 3. Calculated by multiplying the offer exchange ratio (0.485) times EXC’s daily closing stock price 4. Henry Hub forward gas for calendar year 2011 Source: FactSet. Closing prices as of January 29, 2009 Assuming that NRG’s stock price maintained its historic relationship to movement in the IPP index (1) , NRG stock would have declined ~16% since October 17, 2008 in the absence of the Exelon offer (2) ; with those assumptions, NRG’s implied stock price would have been ~$16 at January 29, 2009, compared with its actual closing price of $23.55. During the same period, EXC’s share price increased by ~3.4% to $56.38. • Since the announcement of EXC offer, NRG and EXC have outperformed the IPP index (1) • We believe NRG’s stock price is being supported
by EXC’s offer and is not reflective of NRG’s true stand alone value – we believe NRG’s “market
discovery” process will prove difficult given current commodity and credit conditions |
 2. Capturing the Value of Growth Opportunities
|
 Exelon
Offers Lower Risk Growth Opportunities 9 I/B/E/S ’09-’11 EBITDA 1 I/B/E/S ’09-’11 EPS 1 Growth Drivers “Cost to Achieve Growth” • Nuclear uprates • PA POLR roll-off • PJM capacity markets • Carbon upside • Ordinary business operations expense • STP nuclear expansion with sub-investment grade balance sheet • Other low carbon capital expenditure programs • Heavy capital expenditure investments • Dependence on new build construction including new nuclear 5.5% 15.6% 3.2% 7.4% We believe Exelon’s near- term growth drivers are more predictable and have dramatically less capital at risk than NRG’s 1. Based solely on I/B/E/S estimates for Exelon and NRG as of 1/27/09, representing annual growth rates. Not necessarily representative of either company’s internal forecasts. Provided for illustration only. Not intended as earnings guidance or as a forecast of expected results. |
 10 Exelon is Better Positioned to Capture the Value of Growth Opportunities • Need to find equity partners before starting; decreases flexibility • Sub-optimal power prices and hedges to secure financing • Covenant inflexibility • Cash sweeps to debt holders • Equity selldown before construction • Secure off-take agreements / hedges • Non-recourse, high yield financing • Largest market capitalization in the sector – allowing Exelon to keep proportionately more equity • Balance sheet flexibility to lock-in optimal off-take agreements / hedges when needed • Has option to raise corporate or project level debt depending on value to shareholders NRG’s Development Attributes (1) Implications Exelon Solution Lack of Balance Sheet Flexibility Balance Sheet Strength VS. 1. Per NRG December 1, 2008 investor presentation. • NRG’s development model requires external
solutions that as a standalone company it cannot implement on its own; and • The potential cost to finance its development projects and the availability of capital. We believe the market will likely discount NRG’s standalone growth prospects given: The combined company, given its stronger financial position, will be better positioned to realize the value of growth opportunities than NRG stand alone |
 3.
Committed to Execution |
 12 Committed to Execution 12 Q4 2008 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2009 Receive Regulatory Approvals * Notice filing only 10/19: Announce Offer NRG and Exelon Shareholder Meetings 2/25: Exchange Offer Expires 11/12: Exchange Offer Filed Make Filings and Work to Secure Regulatory Approvals (FERC, NRC, DOJ/FTC, PUCT, NYPSC, PAPUC, CPUC, ICC*) Proxy Solicitation Expected Transaction Close |
 13 Strong Initial Exchange Offer Results 13 • As of January 6 th , 45.6% of NRG shares had been tendered into the exchange offer • Many NRG shareholders have informed Exelon they want to see meaningful discussions sooner rather than later • NRG board and management continue to refuse to allow due diligence - designed to verify assumed values and identify additional value - that could lead to a negotiated transaction • Exchange offer extended until February 25 th • Seeking highest possible level of NRG shareholder support to facilitate a negotiated transaction between Exelon and NRG A strong tender result on February 25 th is the best way for NRG shareholders to facilitate a transaction We remain committed to and are moving forward with the transaction |
 Moving Forward with Proxy Solicitation • Pursuing, and soliciting proxies for, two shareholder actions at NRG annual meeting • Proposed an expansion of the NRG board from 12 to 19 directors • Nominated nine well-qualified, independent candidates who we believe will act in the best interests of NRG and the NRG shareholders • Encouraging NRG shareholders to support the proposed slate • Materials will be sent to NRG shareholders, including a proxy and instructions on how to vote for the slate of new directors • Vote will take place at the NRG annual shareholder meeting, likely to occur in May or June NRG shareholders deserve independent, well-qualified NRG directors to act in their best interest 14 |
 Making Progress on Regulatory Approvals • Initial filings have been made with the following (1) : • FERC (Docket #EC09-32-000) • Hart-Scott-Rodino (DOJ/FTC) • Request for additional information was issued by the DOJ on January 16 th , extending HSR waiting period • NRC • State regulatory commissions, including • Texas (Docket #36555) • New York (Docket #08 E 1486) • Filings will also be made with the following: • Pennsylvania and California state regulatory commissions • Various state siting commissions • Notice filing in Illinois 1. As of February 6, 2009 Regulatory hurdles are manageable 15 |
 Financing Is Not an Obstacle • Believe we can obtain committed financing for the entire ~$8 billion of NRG debt, if needed, at the appropriate time • Decision to defer commitments allows us to take advantage of improving credit markets • Exelon’s relationships with many of NRG’s banks should facilitate arrangements for new credit facilities when current conflicts are eliminated • Believe a negotiated combination can be structured in a way to reduce refinancing requirements to $4B or less • We believe that the contemplated structure would not trigger the change of control provision for NRG’s $4.7B of Senior Notes, and would substantially improve credit metrics for those bondholders • We have asked for approval of the contemplated structure in our regulatory filings 16 Reflecting our confidence that we can obtain committed financing at the appropriate time, our offer is not subject to a financing condition |
 • Full and generous price – upfront premium of 37% • Tax-free opportunity to participate in the future growth of the largest and most diversified US power company, with a substantially improved credit profile and access to liquidity • Requisite scope, scale and financial strength • Stronger credit metrics and investment grade balance sheet • Best-in-class nuclear and fossil operations • Low-cost generator, operating in the most attractive markets • Exelon 2020 principles will be adapted to the combined fleet • Potential for substantial synergies • Manageable regulatory hurdles to close Compelling Value for NRG Shareholders 17 |
 Appendix 18 |
 Without Premium 0 1,000 3,000 2,000 With Premium Conservative DCF Estimate Replacement Costs NRG Stock Value NRG Long-Term Value 975 1,350 2,050 3,000+ Price per Kilowatt Comparison for Texas Baseload Generation Less than 45% of replacement value Even with premium, purchase price is 66% of conservative long-term DCF value $/kW values are for 5,325 MW of Texas baseload which includes Parish coal, Limestone
and STP; values implied by NRG stock price are determined by subtracting
value of other NRG assets from NRG enterprise value based on October 17th close. Exelon Unlocks NRG Value Price ($/kilowatt) 19 |
 Combination Expected to Create Substantial Synergies Exelon Operations & Maintenance: $4,289 1 NRG Maintenance & Other Opex: $950 General & Admin Expenses: $309 Other COGS: $454 Pro Forma Combined Non-fuel Expenses: $6,002 Estimated Annual Cost Savings: $180 - $300 2 % of Combined Expenses: 3%-5% Costs to Achieve $100 NPV of Estimated Synergies: $1,500-$3,000 20 ($ in Millions) Transaction expected to create $1.5 – $3 billion of value through synergies – with opportunity for more Reflects no revenue or fuel cost synergies. Excludes transaction and other costs
of $654 million and excludes increased interest expense related to
refinancing of NRG debt. 1. Company 10-K for 2007 and investor
presentations. 2. Based on a preliminary analysis of publicly
available information. Subject to due diligence investigation. 1
|
 Market
capitalization as of 10/17/2008 $5.3 billion $0.4 Value to NRG Shareholders $2.4 billion $5.1 $2.0 Market cap as of 10/17/08 Premium to NRG Value of estimated synergies Market cap as of 10/17/08 + premium + synergies Additional upside to NRG shareholders Market capitalization as of 10/17/2008 $5.3 billion (1) (2) $7.7 billion (3) (4) $12.8 billion NRG Shareholders Capture Value Excludes transaction and other costs of $654 million and excludes increased interest
expense related to refinancing of NRG debt. 1. Assumes 275M diluted shares outstanding. 2. Assumes an offer price of $26.43; 37% premium to 10/17/08 close price; 275M
shares outstanding. 3. Value of synergies to NRG shareholders based on proportionate ownership of combined
entity. Synergies estimate based on mid point of $1.5 billion - $3.0 billion. 4. Additional upside defined as the value that is created if both companies’ stocks simultaneously reach their respective 52-week high prices (EXC: $92.13, NRG: $45.78). 21 Value Creation to NRG Shareholders ($ billions) Creates compelling value for NRG shareholders today and allows them to share in growth of Exelon stock. Value to NRG shareholders 44% of market cap $12.8 billion = $46.50 per NRG share > NRG’s 52-week high |
 Percent Contribution of Free Cash Flow 22 1. NRG’s 12/1/2008 “NRG’s Path to Shareholder Value” presentation, slide 4. Implied ownership based on a 0.485x exchange ratio 2. PECO PPA assumes market prices as of 11/30/2008. Assumes carbon at $10-20 per tonne. Not necessarily representative of either company’s internal forecast or indicative of results for
any other year. • NRG states they contribute 30% of the free cash flow while getting 17% ownership of the pro-forma company based on offer 1 • NRG’s position is only a single year (2008) calculation • Ignores PECO PPA roll-off in 2011 and Exelon carbon uplift • Factoring in these two omitted pieces for 2008, NRG’s free cash flow contribution of the pro-forma company would be 15-17% for 2008 2 |
 Pro
Forma Exelon 23 Combined company expected to have requisite scope, scale and financial strength to succeed in an increasingly volatile energy market Pro Forma Quick Stats ($s in millions) Combined assets 1 $68,900 LTM EBITDA 2 $9,400 Market cap (as of 1/27/2009) $41,800 Enterprise value 3 $62,500 Generating capacity 4 ~51,000 MWs Combination Will Result in Scope, Scale and Financial Strength 1. Reflects total assets (under GAAP) with no adjustments. Based upon 9/30/08 Form 10-Q. 2. Reflects Last Twelve Months EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) as of 9/30/08 with no adjustments. 3. Calculation of Enterprise Value = Market Capitalization (as of 1/27/09) + Total Debt (as of 9/30/08) + Preferred Securities (as of 9/30/08) + Minority Interest (as of 9/30/08) – Cash & Cash Equivalents (as of 9/30/08). Debt, Preferred Securities, Minority Interest and Cash & Cash Equivalents based upon 9/30/08 Form 10-Q. 4. Includes owned and contracted capacity after giving effect to planned divestitures after regulatory approvals. Enterprise Value Market Cap $0 $30 $50 $60 $40 $20 $70 $10 Southern Dominion Duke FPL First Energy Entergy |
 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 EXC D PEG PPL EIX NRG MIR DYN RRI 10/17/2007 10/17/2008 24 Credit Ratings Are a Valuation Differentiator 1-year Forward EV/EBITDA Investment Grade Non-Investment Grade Source: Bloomberg, FactSet as of 10/17/2008 Investment grade credit ratings provide access to capital markets for growth capital and minimize collateral requirements which maximizes liquidity and contributes to superior valuations in difficult markets Multiples of non-investment grade peers have fallen approximately 40%, whereas multiples of EXC and its investment grade peers have fallen less than 15% 5.6 9.6 Non-Investment Grade 6.8 7.7 Investment Grade 2008 2007 Average Multiples (x) |
 6.0% 8.0% 8.80% 12.10% Exelon Generation NRG 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 10/18/2007 12/30/2007 3/12/2008 5/24/2008 8/5/2008 10/17/2008 NRG Exelon 25 Stable, Predictable Cash Flow Is Awarded Premium Valuation Exelon’s strong, diversified cash flow streams have provided for a more stable valuation during periods of depressed commodity valuations and/or market turbulence. 4.6x 7.5x 1. Yield to maturity of weighted average of Exelon Generation outstanding publicly traded debt 2. Yield to maturity of weighted average of NRG outstanding publicly traded debt Source: Per NRG December 1, 2008 investor presentations, Company filings, Bloomberg Average EV / LTM EBITDA for last: Current 1 month 6 months 1 year NRG 4.6 5.8 8.2 8.3 Exelon 7.5 7.8 9.7 9.8 1 2 BBB+ B+ 7/1/08 10/17/08 7/1/08 10/17/08 We believe the market will likely discount NRG’s standalone growth prospects given the potential cost to finance its development projects. Credit Rating Exelon Debt (YTM) NRG Debt (YTM) Enterprise Value / LTM EBITDA Cost of Debt Source: FactSet as of 10/17/2008 6.7% 1/27/09 BBB 8.4% 1/27/09 BBB+ |
 World
Class Nuclear & Fossil Operations 26 NRG: High performing nuclear plant • Top quartile capacity factor: 94.9% • Large, well-maintained, relatively young units Fossil fleet • Half of >500 MW coal units are top quartile capacity factor • 90% of coal fleet lower-cost PRB and lignite Combined Company: • Largest U.S. power company in terms of generating capacity: ~51,000 MW fleet (18,000 MW nuclear) • Best-in-class nuclear and fossil operations • Second lowest carbon emitting intensity in the industry • Geographic and fuel diversification with an improved dispatch profile Exelon: Premier U.S. nuclear fleet • Best fleet capacity factor: ~ 94% • Lowest fleet production costs: ~ $15 / MWh • Shortest fleet average refueling outage duration: 24 days • Strong reputation for performance and safety |
 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Operator (# of Reactors) Range 5-Year Average Sources: Platt’s, Nuclear News, Nuclear Energy Institute and Energy Information Administration (Department of Energy). Sustained production excellence EXC: World-Class Nuclear Fleet Operator Average Capacity Factor Range of Fleet 2-Yr Avg Capacity Factor (2003-2007) EXC 93.5% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Exelon Industry 27 |
 1 st Quartile 2 nd Quartile 3 rd Quartile 4 th Quartile 2006-2007 Average Production Cost for Major Nuclear Operators (1) Average Among major nuclear plant fleet operators, Exelon is consistently the lowest-cost producer of electricity in the nation EXC: Lowest Cost Nuclear Fleet Operator 1. Source: 2007 Electric Utility Cost Group (EUCG) survey. Includes Fuel Cost plus Direct O&M divided by net generation. 28 |
 29 Operating in Most Attractive Markets • Geographically complementary generation asset base • Predominantly located in competitive markets • Strong presence in PJM (Mid-Atlantic and Midwest) and ERCOT 6,280 Contracted* 51,403 2,085 CAL ISO 13,027 ERCOT By RTO Combined¹ PJM 22,812 MISO 1,065 ISO NE 2,174 NYISO 3,960 SERC 2,405 WECC 45 Total 53,853 By Fuel Type Combined¹ Nuclear 18,144 Coal 8,986 Gas/Oil 18,801 Other 1,642 Contracted 6,280 *Contracted in various RTOs, mainly in PJM and ERCOT 1. Excludes international assets. Before any divestitures. Exelon NRG |
 <1% <1% 6% Coal Exelon ~150,000 GWh 1 Pro Forma Exelon ~198,000 GWh 1 Nuclear PRB & Lignite Coal Other Coal Gas/Oil Hydro/Other 2009 Historical Forward Coal Prices Combined Entity Will Continue to Benefit from Low Cost, Low Volatility Fuel Sources Powder River Basin and lignite coal supply (90% of NRG’s coal) provides low-sulfur at a relatively stable price as compared to northern and central Appalachian coal mines. 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Powder River Basin Northern Appalachian Central Appalachian Production Costs 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Nuclear Gas Coal Petroleum Combined fleet will continue to be predominantly low-cost fuel. 93% Nuclear 1% 3% 75% Nuclear 6% Other Coal 1. Based on 2007 data, does not include ~38,000 GWh of Exelon Purchased Power. Q1 2007 Q2 2007 Q3 2007 Q4 2007 Q1 2008 Q2 2008 Q3 2008 cents/Kwh $/mmbtu 30 15% PRB & Lignite Coal |
 0 50 100 150 50 100 150 200 250 2006 Electricity Generated (GWh, in thousands) NRG TVA AEP Duke FPL Southern Exelon + NRG Entergy Exelon Dominion Progress FirstEnergy Bubble size represents carbon intensity, expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 per MWh generated Source: EIA and EPA data as compiled by NRDC Exelon 2020 principles will be adapted to the combined fleet CO2 Emissions of Largest US Electricity Generators 2006 CO2 Emissions from Electricity Generation (in million metric tons) Largest Fleet, 2 nd Lowest Carbon Intensity Top Generators by CO2 Intensity 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 AEP NRG Southern Duke FirstEnergy TVA Progress Dominion FPL Exelon + NRG Entergy Exelon 0.83 0.80 0.74 0.66 0.64 0.64 0.57 0.50 0.35 0.31 0.26 0.07 31 |
 Exelon 2020 and NRG Offer more low carbon electricity in the marketplace Reduce emissions from coal/oil fired generation Help our customers and the communities we serve reduce their GHG emissions Reduce or offset our footprint by greening our operations Adapt Elements of Exelon 2020 to NRG • Expand internal energy efficiency, SF6, vehicle, and supply chain initiatives to NRG portfolio • Offset a portion of NRG’s GHG emissions • Expand energy efficiency program offerings • Add capacity to existing nuclear units through uprates • Add new renewable generation • Add new gas-fired capacity • Continue to explore new nuclear • Address older/higher emitting coal and oil units • Invest in clean coal technology R&D 32 Taking the next step in Exelon’s commitment to address climate change Options to Evaluate: Expand the 2020 Plan |
 Clear
Value under Multiple Scenarios Value Gas Prices New Build Costs Carbon Year/Price Recession $0 $6.50 $1,300 Moderate 2014/$22 $7.30 $1,100 Moderate 2020/$22 $7.10 $1,100 Severe 2014/$22 $7.30 $1,500 Moderate 2012/$12 $8.60 $1,500 Moderate 33 We look at fundamental value creation under a wide range of future commodity price scenarios and our analysis suggests $1-3 billion of value, possibly more. Gas price is long-term price in 2008 $/MMBtu; coal price is long-term price in 2008 $/ton for PRB8800 excluding transportation; new build cost is long-term combined cycle cost in PJM in 2008 overnight $/kW; carbon year is year in which national cap and trade starts; carbon price is in 2012 $/tonne assuming 7% escalation; moderate recession assumes conditions consistent with current forward prices; and severe recession assumes five years of no load growth. Coal Prices $11.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $11.00 |
 34 Exelon More Than Meets the “Five Imperatives” Outlined by NRG on May 28, 2008 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. NRG’s Stated Imperatives MUST accumulate generation at competitive cost This transaction accomplishes in one step what several transactions might have accomplished for NRG in these regards. Given the current difficulty in accessing capital markets, it is unclear whether NRG would have the ability to meet this objective without Exelon. Exelon provides NRG stakeholders with broad trading expertise and sound power marketing and risk management practices. Exelon’s significant experience in markets with locational prices is particularly relevant since ERCOT is moving to a PJM-type structure. Exelon’s breadth of operations and depth of service allows significant access to customers, retail providers, and other sales channels. NRG stakeholders become part of the most diversified and competitive generation portfolio operating in 12 different states and 6 different regional transmission organizations. Deal expected to provide NRG stakeholders with significant value and upside and a share of the largest unregulated generation fleet in the United States. MUST be geographically diversified in multiple markets MUST develop and expand our route to market through contracting with retail load providers, trading, direct sales, etc MUST have sophisticated ability to trade, procure, hedge, and originate for electricity and input fuels MUST develop depth and breadth in key markets, particularly across fuel types, transmission constraints and merit order Exelon Combination More than Meets These Imperatives |