UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21348
Name of Fund: BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MUI)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 04/30/2011
Date of reporting period: 04/30/2011
Item 1 – Report to Stockholders
|
|
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Annual Report |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (MHD) |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. (MUH) |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc. (MUS) |
|
|
|
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MUI) |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. (MVT) |
|
|
Not FDIC Insured § No Bank Guarantee § May Lose Value |
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
3 |
|
Annual Report: |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
13 |
|
49 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
62 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Time and again, we have seen how various global events and developing trends can have significant influence on financial markets. I hope you find that the following review of recent market conditions provides additional perspective on the performance of your investments as you read this shareholder report.
Over the past 12 months, we have seen a sluggish, stimulus-driven economic recovery at long last gain real traction, accelerate, and transition into a consumption-driven expansion. For the most part, 2010 was plagued with widely fluctuating economic data, but as the year drew to a close, it became clear that cyclical stimulus had beaten out structural problems as economic data releases generally became more positive and financial markets showed signs of continuing improvement. Although the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and high inflation in developing markets that troubled the global economy in 2010 remain challenges today, overall investor confidence has improved considerably. During the first four months of 2011, that confidence was shaken by political turmoil in the Middle East/North Africa region, soaring prices of oil and other commodities, tremendous natural disasters in Japan and a change in the ratings outlook for US debt. However, strong corporate earnings prevailed and financial markets resumed their course while the global economy continued to garner strength.
Equity markets experienced uneven growth and high volatility in 2010, but ended the year with gains. Following a strong start to 2011, the series of confidence-shaking events brought spurts of heightened volatility to markets worldwide, but was not enough to derail the bull market. Overall, global equities posted strong returns over the past 12 months. Emerging market equities, which had outperformed developed markets earlier in the period, fell prey to heightened inflationary pressures and underperformed developed markets later in the period. In the United States, strong corporate earnings and positive signals from the labor market were sources of encouragement for equity investors, although the housing market did not budge from its slump. Early in 2011, the US Federal Reserve announced that it would continue its Treasury purchase program (QE2) through to completion and keep interest rates low for an extended period. This compelled investors to continue buying riskier assets, furthering the trend of small cap stocks outperforming large caps.
While fixed income markets saw yields trend lower (pushing bond prices higher) through most of 2010, the abrupt reversal in investor sentiment and risk tolerance in the fourth quarter drove yields sharply upward. Global credit markets were surprisingly resilient in the face of recent headwinds and yields regained relative stability as the period came to a close. Yield curves globally remained steep by historical standards and higher-risk sectors continued to outperform higher-quality assets. The tax-exempt municipal market enjoyed a powerful rally during the period of low yields in 2010, but when that trend reversed, the market was dealt an additional blow as it became evident that the Build America Bond program would not be extended. Meanwhile, municipal finance troubles raised credit concerns among investors and tax-exempt mutual funds experienced heavy outflows, resulting in wider spreads and falling prices. The new year brought relief from these headwinds and a rebound in the tax-exempt municipal market.
Cash investments, as represented by the 3-month Treasury bill, returned only a fraction over 0% for the 12-month period as short-term interest rates remained low. Yields on money market securities remain near all-time lows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Assets Rallied on Growing Investor Confidence: Total Returns as of April 30, 2011 |
|
6-month |
|
12-month |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
US large cap equities (S&P 500® Index) |
|
|
16.36 |
% |
|
17.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US small cap equities (Russell 2000® Index) |
|
|
23.73 |
|
|
22.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International equities (MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index) |
|
|
12.71 |
|
|
19.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging market equities (MSCI Emerging Markets Index) |
|
|
9.74 |
|
|
20.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-month Treasury bill (BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month Treasury Bill Index) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities (BofA Merrill Lynch 10-Year US Treasury Index) |
|
|
(3.85 |
) |
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US investment grade bonds (Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt municipal bonds (Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index) |
|
|
(1.68 |
) |
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US high yield bonds (Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index) |
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
13.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
While no one can peer into a crystal ball and eliminate the uncertainties presented by the economic landscape and financial markets, BlackRock can offer investors the next best thing: partnership with the worlds largest asset management firm that delivers consistent long-term investment results with fewer surprises. For additional market perspective and investment insight, visit www.blackrock.com/shareholdermagazine, where youll find the most recent issue of our award-winning Shareholder® magazine, as well as its quarterly companion newsletter, Shareholder Perspectives. As always, we thank you for entrusting BlackRock with your investments, and we look forward to your continued partnership in the months and years ahead.
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Kapito |
|
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period Ended April 30, 2011 |
|
Twelve months ago, the municipal yield curve was much flatter than it is today, as investor concerns were focused on the possibility of deflation and a double-dip in the US economy. From April through September 2010, rates moved lower (and prices higher) across the curve, reaching historic lows in August when the yield on 5-year issues touched 1.06%, the 10-year reached 2.18%, and the 30-year was 3.67%. The market took a turn in October, with yields drifting higher (and prices lower) amid a perfect storm of events that ultimately resulted in the worst quarterly performance the municipal market had seen since the Fed tightening cycle of 1994. Treasury yields lost their support as concerns over the US deficit raised the question whether foreign investors would continue to purchase Treasury securities at historically low yields. Municipal valuations also suffered a quick and severe setback as it became evident that the Build America Bond (BAB) program would expire at the end of 2010. The program opened the taxable market to municipal issuers, which had successfully alleviated supply pressure in the traditional tax-exempt marketplace, bringing down yields in that space.
The financial media has been replete with interviews, articles and presentations depicting the stress experienced in municipal finance. This has resulted in a loss of confidence among retail investors, the traditional buyers of individual municipal bonds and mutual funds. From the middle of November through year-end, mutual funds specializing in tax-exempt bonds witnessed weekly outflows averaging over $2.5 billion. Long-term and high-yield funds saw the greatest redemptions, followed by state-specific funds at a slower, yet still significant, pace. Political uncertainty surrounding the midterm elections and the approach taken by the new Congress on issues such as income tax rates, alternative minimum tax and the previously mentioned BAB expiration exacerbated the situation. All these conditions, combined with the seasonal illiquidity surrounding year-end holidays and dealers closing their fiscal books, sapped willing market participation from the trading community. December brought declining demand for municipal securities with no comparable reduction in supply. As it became evident that the BAB program would be retired, issuers rushed deals to market in the taxable and, to a lesser degree, traditional tax-exempt space. This imbalance in the supply/demand technicals provided the classic market reaction: wider quality spreads and higher bond yields.
Demand usually is strong at the beginning of a new year, but retail investors continued to move away from municipal mutual funds, with AMG Data Services showing $19.9 billion of redemptions in the first four months of 2011. Since mid-November, outflows persisted for 24 consecutive weeks, totaling $33.4 billion. Fortunately, lower supply in 2011 is offsetting the decline in demand. According to Thomson Reuters, through April, year-to-date new issuance was down 53% compared to the same period last year. Issuers have been reluctant to bring new deals to the market due to a number of factors, including higher interest rates, fiscal policy changes and a reduced need for municipal borrowing given the acceleration of some issuance into 2010 prior to the BAB programs expiration. Accordingly, estimates for 2011 issuance have ratcheted down more than $100 billion since the beginning of the year, when the initial consensus was $350 billion.
Overall, the municipal yield curve steepened during the period from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2011.As measured by Thomson Municipal Market Data, 30-year yields on AAA-rated municipals rose 53 basis points (bps) to 4.58%, while yields for 5-year maturities rallied by 22 bps to 1.50%, and 10-year maturities rallied by 9 bps to 2.85%.With the exception of the 2- to 5-year range, the spread between maturities increased over the past year, with the greatest increase seen in the 5- to 30-year range, where the spread widened by 75 bps, while overall the slope between 2- and 30-year maturities increased by 66 bps to 402 bps.
The fundamental picture for municipalities will be subject to scrutiny for months to come, as the challenges to state and local budgets are real and need to be addressed with significant cuts to expenses and tax revenue increases. The debates around austerity measures needed to succeed in balancing these budgets are not over whether action needs to be taken, but over the magnitude, approach and political will to accomplish these needs. The heightened attention on municipal finance has the potential to improve this market for the future, especially if these efforts result in greater means toward disclosure and accuracy (and timeliness) of reporting. Progress toward these fundamental changes may be tested in the near future, as California, Illinois and Puerto Rico will soon need to take austerity measures and access financing in the municipal market to address immediate-term fiscal imbalances before their new fiscal year begins in July. As the economy improves, tax receipts for states are rising and have begun to exceed budget projections. BlackRock maintains a constructive view of the municipal market as we look beyond the interim challenges faced by states working to close their June 30 year-end shortfalls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc.s (MUA) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide high current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of medium- to lower-grade or unrated municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel, is exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests at least 65% of its assets in municipal bonds that are rated in the medium to lower categories by nationally recognized rating services (for example, Baa or lower by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or BBB or lower by Standard & Poors Corporation) or non-rated securities which are of comparable quality. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned (5.17)% based on market price and 2.31% based on net asset value (NAV). For the same period, the closed-end Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of (1.08)% based on market price and 1.40% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a premium to NAV to a discount by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Funds concentrated holdings in corporate-related industrial development bonds and low exposure to the underperforming tobacco sector contributed positively to performance. Additional benefits were derived from seasoned portfolio holdings with shorter remaining terms to their maturity, which exhibited lower price volatility compared to longer-dated bonds during the period. As interest rates rose and the yield curve steepened in the later part of the period, holdings of longer-dated bonds detracted from performance. In addition, certain investments in development district (special district) bonds hurt returns as scheduled construction fell significantly below expectations due to the continuing slump in real estate values.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) |
|
|
MUA |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
June 25, 1993 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($11.27)1 |
|
|
6.65% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
10.23% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0625 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.7500 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents tender option bond trusts (TOBs) as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
11.27 |
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
|
(10.91 |
)% |
$ |
13.21 |
|
$ |
10.90 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
12.14 |
|
$ |
12.63 |
|
|
(3.88 |
)% |
$ |
13.12 |
|
$ |
11.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
27 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
22 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
15 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
14 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
8 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Education |
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Housing |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
State |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
1 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
3 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
8 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
A |
|
12 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
28 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
B |
|
5 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
CC/Ca |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
31 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of Standard & Poors (S&Ps) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2011 and April 30, 2010, the market value of these securities was $25,268,218 representing 6% and $15,867,930 representing 6%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc.s (MEN) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
Effective November 9, 2010, the Funds investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of its assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category into the Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category. For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned (1.44)% based on market price and 0.78% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (0.60)% based on market price and 0.10% based on NAV, and the closed-end Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 0.17% based on market price and 0.85% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Funds performance was positively impacted by its shorter duration holdings (those with lower sensitivity to interest rate movements) such as advanced refunded bonds and higher coupon bonds pricing to shorter call dates. Shorter duration securities performed well during the period as the shorter end of the yield curve rallied while long-term rates rose. The Fund also benefited from its exposure to the housing and corporate sectors, which performed well during the period. Detracting from performance was the Funds exposure to the long end of the yield curve, where interest rates rose sharply. Exposure to lower quality spread sectors also had a negative impact as credit spreads generally widened over the period. The Fund uses interest rate futures contracts to hedge portfolio risk related to movements in interest rates. This strategy had a modestly negative impact on performance during the period.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MEN |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
March 2, 1989 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($9.99)1 |
|
|
6.85% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
10.54% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$ 0.057 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$ 0.684 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Auction Market Preferred Shares (AMPS) and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to AMPS and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
9.99 |
|
$ |
10.81 |
|
|
(7.59 |
)% |
$ |
11.70 |
|
$ |
9.52 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
10.30 |
|
$ |
10.90 |
|
|
(5.50 |
)% |
$ |
11.47 |
|
$ |
9.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
29 |
% |
|
28 |
% |
|
Transportation |
|
23 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
State |
|
19 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
Health |
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Education |
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Housing |
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
12 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
59 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
A |
|
25 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc.s (MHD) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned (0.21)% based on market price and 0.57% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (0.60)% based on market price and 0.10% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. Security selection and sector allocation among corporates, transportation and education as well as tax-backed issues in the Great Lakes region drove the Funds positive performance. Additional benefits were derived from seasoned portfolio holdings with shorter remaining terms to their maturity, which exhibited lower price volatility compared to longer-dated bonds during the period. As interest rates rose and the yield curve steepened in the later part of the period, holdings of longer-dated bonds detracted from performance. In addition, the Funds high exposure to the health care sector and low exposure to tax-backed issues in the Far West and Mid-Atlantic regions had a negative impact on performance. The Fund uses interest rate futures contracts to hedge portfolio risk related to movements in interest rates. This strategy had a modestly negative impact on performance during the period.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MHD |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
May 2, 1997 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($14.51)1 |
|
|
7.48% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
11.51% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0905 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$1.0860 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents AMPS and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to AMPS and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
14.51 |
|
$ |
15.70 |
|
|
(7.58 |
)% |
$ |
17.05 |
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
14.67 |
|
$ |
15.75 |
|
|
(6.86 |
)% |
$ |
16.55 |
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
23 |
% |
|
23 |
% |
|
Transportation |
|
16 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
State |
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
12 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Education |
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Housing |
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
12 |
% |
|
19 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
40 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
A |
|
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
13 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
B |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2011 and April 30, 2010, the market value of these securities was $3,863,321 representing 1% and $2,973,600 representing 1%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc.s (MUH) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned (2.14)% based on market price and 0.92% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (0.60)% based on market price and 0.10% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a premium to NAV to a discount by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. Security selection and sector allocation among corporates, transportation and housing as well as tax-backed issues in the Great Lakes region drove the Funds positive performance. Additional benefits were derived from seasoned portfolio holdings with shorter remaining terms to their maturity, which exhibited lower price volatility compared to longer-dated bonds during the period. As interest rates rose and the yield curve steepened in the later part of the period, holdings of longer-dated bonds detracted from performance. In addition, the Funds high exposure to the health care sector and low exposure to tax-backed issues in the Far West and Mid-Atlantic regions had a negative impact on performance. The Fund uses interest rate futures contracts to hedge portfolio risk related to movements in interest rates. This strategy had a modestly negative impact on performance during the period.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MUH |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
February 27, 1998 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($13.35)1 |
|
|
7.33% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
11.28% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0815 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.9780 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
37% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents AMPS and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to AMPS and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
13.35 |
|
$ |
14.68 |
|
|
(9.06 |
)% |
$ |
16.48 |
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.74 |
|
$ |
14.65 |
|
|
(6.21 |
)% |
$ |
15.39 |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
22 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
|
Transportation |
|
14 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
13 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
State |
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Education |
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Housing |
|
5 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
13 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
42 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
A |
|
20 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
B |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2011 and April 30, 2010, the market value of these securities was $1,064,679 representing 0% and $4,406,945 representing 2%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
Effective November 9, 2010, BlackRock MuniHoldings Insured Fund, Inc. changed its name to BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc.
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc.s (MUS) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in investment grade municipal obligations with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
Effective November 9, 2010, the Funds investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of its assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category into the Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category. For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned (1.60)% based on market price and 0.21% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (0.60)% based on market price and 0.10% based on NAV, and the closed-end Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 0.17% based on market price and 0.85% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a premium to NAV to a discount by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Funds holdings of higher quality essential service bonds with high coupon rates (6% or higher) contributed positively to performance as interest rates rose during the period. Higher coupon bonds typically outperform lower coupon bonds in a rising interest rate environment as higher coupon bonds are priced to a shorter call date, while lower coupon bonds are priced to maturity. The Fund maintained a fully invested posture during the period, which enhanced the Funds total return by boosting its income accrual. Detracting from performance was the Funds exposure to long duration bonds (those with greater sensitivity to interest rate movements) and long-dated bonds as long-term interest rates rose sharply. The surprise non-extension of the Build America Bond (BAB) program at the end of 2010 put upward pressure on the long end of the yield curve, where most of the BAB supply was issued. Additionally, the yield curve steepened during the period as a result of the general perception among investors that the economy is improving, along with higher inflation expectations. The Fund uses interest rate futures contracts to hedge portfolio risk related to movements in interest rates. This strategy had a modestly negative impact on performance during the period.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MUS |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
May 1, 1998 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($12.31)1 |
|
|
7.21% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
11.09% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.074 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.888 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents AMPS and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to AMPS and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
$ |
13.40 |
|
|
(8.13 |
)% |
$ |
14.73 |
|
$ |
10.87 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
12.48 |
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
(6.45 |
)% |
$ |
13.94 |
|
$ |
11.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
26 |
% |
|
33 |
% |
|
Utilities |
|
24 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
21 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
State |
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Health |
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Housing |
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Education |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
9 |
% |
|
58 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
69 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
A |
|
18 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Not Rated |
|
|
|
|
1 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010, the market value of these securities was $2,342,435 representing 1% of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc.s (MUI) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide common shareholders with high current income exempt from federal income taxes taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds with a duration of three to ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned 2.41% based on market price and 3.86% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 3.14% based on market price and 3.98% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Fund benefited from its heavy weighting in the tax-backed sector, which was among the strongest performing sectors during the period. A significant exposure to the corporate sector also had a positive impact on performance. The Funds strong bias toward higher quality issues proved beneficial, as did its holdings issued by New York, which was one of the better performing states during the period. Detracting from performance was the Funds overexposure to hospital bonds, which underperformed the market, and underexposure to the strong-performing housing sector. Traditionally, municipal bonds issued in high-tax states tend to provide a better store of value and liquidity than lower-taxing states when markets are declining. However, under the current economic conditions, higher-taxing states are more severely impacted by heavy deficits and suffer the most credit deterioration. As a result, the Funds overexposure to California and New Jersey credits, and the traditionally higher-yielding state of Illinois, negatively impacted returns.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MUI |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
August 1, 2003 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($13.65)1 |
|
|
6.29% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
9.68% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0715 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.8580 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares (VRDP Shares) and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
13.65 |
|
$ |
14.13 |
|
|
(3.40 |
)% |
$ |
16.17 |
|
$ |
12.76 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
(2.03 |
)% |
$ |
15.59 |
|
$ |
13.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
State |
|
22 |
% |
|
23 |
% |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
21 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
Health |
|
15 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Education |
|
8 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
5 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Housing |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
14 |
% |
|
28 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
39 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
A |
|
25 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
B |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
8 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2011 and April 30, 2010, the market value of these securities was $21,293,420 representing 2% and $11,900,188 representing 1%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc.s (MVT) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2011, the Fund returned (1.04)% based on market price and 0.73% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (0.60)% based on market price and 0.10% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds premium to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Security selection and sector allocation among corporates and transportation as well as tax-backed issues in the Great Lakes region drove the Funds positive performance. Additional benefits were derived from seasoned portfolio holdings with shorter remaining terms to their maturity, which exhibited lower price volatility compared to longer-dated bonds during the period. As interest rates rose and the yield curve steepened in the later part of the period, holdings of longer-dated bonds detracted from performance. In addition, the Funds high exposure to the health care sector and low exposure to tax-backed issues in the Far West and Mid-Atlantic regions had a negative impact on performance. The Fund uses interest rate futures contracts to hedge portfolio risk related to movements in interest rates. This strategy had a modestly negative impact on performance during the period.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MVT |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
March 29, 1993 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2011 ($13.72)1 |
|
|
7.74% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
11.91% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0885 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$1.0620 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20114 |
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents AMPS and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to AMPS and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
$ |
14.94 |
|
|
(8.17 |
)% |
$ |
15.84 |
|
$ |
12.30 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.47 |
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
(6.52 |
)% |
$ |
15.12 |
|
$ |
12.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
25 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
16 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
15 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
State |
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Education |
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Housing |
|
3 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/11 |
|
4/30/10 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
10 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
45 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
A |
|
21 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2011 and April 30, 2010, the market value of these securities was $4,588,089 representing 1% and $5,505,082 representing 1%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
11 |
|
|
The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging
The Funds may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and NAV of their common shares (Common Shares). However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.
To leverage, all of the Funds, except MUA, issue AMPS or VRDP Shares (collectively Preferred Shares), which pay dividends at prevailing short-term interest rates, and invest the proceeds in long-term municipal bonds. In general, the concept of leveraging is based on the premise that the cost of assets to be obtained from leverage, which will be based on short-term interest rates, will normally be lower than the income earned by each Fund on its longer-term portfolio investments. To the extent that the total assets of each Fund (including the assets obtained from leverage) are invested in higher-yielding portfolio investments, each Funds holders of Common Shares (Common Shareholders) will benefit from the incremental net income.
To illustrate these concepts, assume a Funds Common Shares capitalization is $100 million and it issues Preferred Shares for an additional $50 million, creating a total value of $150 million available for investment in long-term municipal bonds. If prevailing short-term interest rates are 3% and long-term interest rates are 6%, the yield curve has a strongly positive slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the $50 million of Preferred Shares based on the lower short-term interest rates. At the same time, the securities purchased by the Fund with assets received from the Preferred Shares issuance earn the income based on long-term interest rates. In this case, the dividends paid to holders of Preferred Shares are significantly lower than the income earned on the Funds long-term investments, and therefore the Common Shareholders are the beneficiaries of the incremental net income.
If short-term interest rates rise, narrowing the differential between short-term and long-term interest rates, the incremental net income pickup on the Common Shares will be reduced or eliminated completely. Furthermore, if prevailing short-term interest rates rise above long-term interest rates of 6%, the yield curve has a negative slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the higher short-term interest rates whereas the Funds total portfolio earns income based on lower long-term interest rates.
Furthermore, the value of a Funds portfolio investments generally varies inversely with the direction of long-term interest rates, although other factors can influence the value of portfolio investments. In contrast, the redemption value of the Funds Preferred Shares does not fluctuate in relation to interest rates. As a result, changes in interest rates can influence the Funds NAV positively or negatively in addition to the impact on Fund performance from leverage from Preferred Shares discussed above.
The Funds may also leverage their assets through the use of TOBs, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. TOB investments generally will provide the Funds with economic benefits in periods of declining short-term interest rates, but expose the Funds to risks during periods of rising short-term interest rates similar to those associated with Preferred Shares issued by the Funds, as described above. Additionally, fluctuations in the market value of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB trust may adversely affect each Funds NAV per share.
The use of leverage may enhance opportunities for increased income to the Funds and Common Shareholders, but as described above, it also creates risks as short or long-term interest rates fluctuate. Leverage also will generally cause greater changes in the Funds NAVs, market prices and dividend rates than comparable portfolios without leverage. If the income derived from securities purchased with assets received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Funds net income will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the securities purchased is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, each Funds net income will be less than if leverage had not been used, and therefore the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be reduced. Each Fund may be required to sell portfolio securities at inopportune times or at distressed values in order to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to the use of leverage or as required by the terms of leverage instruments, which may cause a Fund to incur losses. The use of leverage may limit each Funds ability to invest in certain types of securities or use certain types of hedging strategies, such as in the case of certain restrictions imposed by ratings agencies that rate Preferred Shares issued by the Funds. Each Fund will incur expenses in connection with the use of leverage, all of which are borne by Common Shareholders and may reduce income to the Common Shares.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Funds are permitted to issue Preferred Shares in an amount up to 50% of their total managed assets at the time of issuance. Under normal circumstances, each Fund anticipates that the total economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs will not exceed 50% (45% for MUI) of its total managed assets at the time such leverage is incurred. As of April 30, 2011, the Funds had economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs as a percentage of their total managed assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUA |
|
5 |
% |
|
MEN |
|
40 |
% |
|
MHD |
|
38 |
% |
|
MUH |
|
37 |
% |
|
MUS |
|
42 |
% |
|
MUI |
|
39 |
% |
|
MVT |
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Funds may invest in various derivative financial instruments, including financial futures contracts, as specified in Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements, which may constitute forms of economic leverage. Such instruments are used to obtain exposure to a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities or to hedge market and/or interest rate risks. Such derivative financial instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of a derivative instrument and the underlying asset or illiquidity of the derivative instrument. The Funds ability to use a derivative instrument successfully depends on the investment advisors ability to predict pertinent market movements accurately, which cannot be assured. The use of derivative financial instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require the Funds to sell or purchase portfolio investments at inopportune times or for distressed values, may limit the amount of appreciation a Fund can realize on an investment, may result in lower dividends paid to shareholders or may cause the Funds to hold an investment that they might otherwise sell. The Funds investments in these instruments are discussed in detail in the Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama State Docks Department, Refunding RB, |
|
$ |
2,165 |
|
$ |
2,155,972 |
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
895 |
|
|
818,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,974,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.80%, 5/01/14 |
|
|
395 |
|
|
394,996 |
|
8.00%, 5/01/23 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,999,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,394,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 4.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County IDA Arizona, RB, Arizona Charter Schools |
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
1,774,498 |
|
Phoenix IDA Arizona, Refunding RB, America West Airlines |
|
|
7,750 |
|
|
6,426,067 |
|
Pima County IDA, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Charter Schools Project, Series E, 7.25%, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,200,157 |
|
Tucson Electric Power Co., Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
3,501,642 |
|
Pima County IDA, Refunding RB, Charter Schools II, |
|
|
670 |
|
|
605,559 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
1,584,958 |
|
5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
1,118,867 |
|
Show Low Improvement District, Special Assessment |
|
|
575 |
|
|
575,725 |
|
University Medical Center Corp. Arizona, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
820 |
|
|
839,918 |
|
6.50%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
511,055 |
|
Yavapai County IDA Arizona, RB, Yavapai Regional Medical |
|
|
500 |
|
|
482,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,621,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Little River Arkansas, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
1,599,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Statewide
Communities Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Baptist Homes of the West, 6.25%, |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
2,051,221 |
|
Senior Living, Southern California, 7.00%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,042,980 |
|
Senior Living, Southern California, 7.25%, 11/15/41 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,660,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Fontana California, Special Tax Bonds, Refunding, |
|
$ |
2,320 |
|
$ |
2,069,440 |
|
City of San Jose California, RB, Convention Center |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50%, 5/01/36 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
908,559 |
|
6.50%, 5/01/42 |
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
2,228,081 |
|
State of California, GO, Various Purpose, 6.00%, |
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
5,550,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,511,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
610 |
|
|
572,650 |
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Refunding RB, CAB, |
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
573,870 |
|
Plaza Metropolitan District No. 1 Colorado, Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Improvement Fee, 8.00%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
4,756,492 |
|
Subordinate Public Improvement Fee, 8.13%, |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
918,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,821,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut State Development Authority, RB, AFCO |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
2,244,570 |
|
Harbor Point Infrastructure Improvement District, Tax |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
1,949,522 |
|
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut, RB, Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 1/01/31 |
|
|
4,395 |
|
|
3,464,183 |
|
5.25%, 1/01/33 (b) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,017,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,675,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Sussex Delaware, RB, NRG Energy, Inc., |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
975,670 |
|
Delaware State EDA, RB, Exempt Facilities, Indian River |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
3,628,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,603,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Abbreviations |
|
To simplify the listings of portfolio holdings in the Schedules of Investments, the names and descriptions of many of the securities have been abbreviated according to the following list:
|
|
ACA |
ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. |
AGC |
Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AGM |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AMBAC |
American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
AMT |
Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to) |
ARB |
Airport Revenue Bonds |
BHAC |
Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. |
CAB |
Capital Appreciation Bonds |
COP |
Certificates of Participation |
EDA |
Economic Development Authority |
EDC |
Economic Development Corp. |
ERB |
Education Revenue Bonds |
FGIC |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHA |
Federal Housing Administration |
GARB |
General Airport Revenue Bonds |
GO |
General Obligation Bonds |
HDA |
Housing Development Authority |
HFA |
Housing Finance Agency |
HRB |
Housing Revenue Bonds |
HUD |
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development |
IDA |
Industrial Development Authority |
IDB |
Industrial Development Board |
IDRB |
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds |
ISD |
Independent School District |
LRB |
Lease Revenue Bonds |
M/F |
Multi-Family |
MRB |
Mortgage Revenue Bonds |
NPFGC |
National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
PSF-GTD |
Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
RB |
Revenue Bonds |
S/F |
Single-Family |
SAN |
State Aid Notes |
TE |
Tax Exempt |
TIF |
Tax Increment Financing |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
District of Columbia 2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Methodist Home District of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.38%, 1/01/30 |
|
$ |
1,665 |
|
$ |
1,632,566 |
|
7.50%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
2,662,543 |
|
District of Columbia, Refunding RB, Howard University, |
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
3,685,776 |
|
District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
1,744,105 |
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.55%, 10/01/30 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
2,002,000 |
|
6.77%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
733,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,460,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 10.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, Refunding RB, Miami |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
1,009,620 |
|
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Florida, RB, Special |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,105,129 |
|
Harbor Bay Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
455 |
|
|
426,954 |
|
Hillsborough County IDA, RB, AMT, National Gypsum Co.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 7.13%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
3,939,795 |
|
Series B, 7.13%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
2,714,081 |
|
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission, RB, |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
1,807,784 |
|
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission, |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
1,506,198 |
|
Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, RB, Series A, 7.25%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
4,530,981 |
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 5/01/24 |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
1,284,224 |
|
6.25%, 5/01/37 |
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
4,098,818 |
|
Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority, RB, Acts |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,103,800 |
|
Santa Rosa Bay Bridge Authority, RB, 6.25%, |
|
|
5,180 |
|
|
1,868,530 |
|
Sarasota County Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/27 |
|
|
955 |
|
|
833,018 |
|
5.50%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
1,126,142 |
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, Sarasota |
|
|
615 |
|
|
614,514 |
|
Sumter Landing Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
2,990,994 |
|
Tampa Palms Open Space & Transportation Community |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
1,904,771 |
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Special |
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
3,011,749 |
|
Village Community Development District No. 9, Special |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%, 5/01/31 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,021,700 |
|
7.00%, 5/01/41 |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
3,285,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,184,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, Princeton |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
871,366 |
|
Clayton County Development Authority, RB, Delta Air |
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
3,707,927 |
|
County of Clayton Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, |
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
2,532,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeKalb County Hospital Authority Georgia, RB, DeKalb |
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
$ |
2,629,693 |
|
Gainesville & Hall County Development Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.38%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
709,856 |
|
6.63%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
880 |
|
|
888,237 |
|
Rockdale County Development Authority, RB, Visy Paper |
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
3,572,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,911,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam Government Waterworks Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
1,197,904 |
|
Territory of Guam, GO, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 11/15/19 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
615,388 |
|
6.75%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
1,071,915 |
|
7.00%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
1,139,352 |
|
Territory of Guam, RB, Section 30, Series A, 5.63%, |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
2,389,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,414,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 5.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB, American |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
5,037,620 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roosevelt University Project, 6.50%, 4/01/44 |
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
4,152,861 |
|
Rush University Medical Center Obligation Group, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,158,060 |
|
Rush University Medical Center Obligation Group, |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
1,262,465 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Clare Water Tower, Series B, 0.04%, 5/15/50 (a) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
9,450 |
|
Clare Water Tower, Series A-7, 6.13%, 5/15/41 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
1,470,350 |
|
Friendship Village of Schaumburg, 7.25%, 2/15/45 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
3,747,480 |
|
Primary Health Care Centers Program, 6.60%, |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
998,915 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
912,938 |
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 6/01/23 |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,350,832 |
|
6.00%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
710 |
|
|
682,835 |
|
Village of Lincolnshire Illinois, Special Tax Bonds, |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
1,521,904 |
|
Village of Wheeling Illinois, Tax Allocation Bonds, North |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
1,304,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,609,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vigo County Hospital Authority Indiana, RB, Union |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70%, 9/01/37 |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
799,996 |
|
5.75%, 9/01/42 |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
976,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
1,499,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,093,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Maryland 2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland EDC, RB, Transportation Facilities Project, |
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
$ |
3,306,641 |
|
Maryland EDC, Refunding RB, CNX Marine |
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
3,932,571 |
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
399,530 |
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
2,534,059 |
|
Maryland State Energy Financing Administration, RB, |
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
2,579,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,752,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, RB, |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
1,022,284 |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Nazarene College, 5.63%, 4/01/19 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
38,023 |
|
Eastern Nazarene College, 5.63%, 4/01/29 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
66,231 |
|
Tufts Medical Center, Series I, 6.75%, 1/01/36 |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
1,475,681 |
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,809,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,411,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Technology Academy, RB, 6.00%, 11/01/37 |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
1,206,656 |
|
County of Wayne Michigan, GO, Building Improvement, |
|
|
900 |
|
|
909,846 |
|
Monroe County Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,482,500 |
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority Michigan, Refunding |
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
7,154,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,753,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis Minnesota, Refunding RB, Fairview |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
1,905,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirkwood IDA Missouri, RB, Aberdeen Heights, Series A, |
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
2,333,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-State 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 7.50%, |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
1,417,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Clark Nevada, Special Assessment Bonds, |
|
|
965 |
|
|
956,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,628,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New Jersey 6.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cigarette Tax, 5.75%, 6/15/29 |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
$ |
1,181,505 |
|
Continental Airlines Inc. Project, AMT, 6.63%, |
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
4,081,023 |
|
Continental Airlines Inc. Project, AMT, 6.25%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,891,420 |
|
Continental Airlines Inc. Project, AMT, 6.40%, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
942,800 |
|
Continental Airlines Inc. Project, AMT, 6.25%, |
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
3,946,752 |
|
Continental Airlines Inc. Project, AMT, 9.00%, |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,298,700 |
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding RB, Newark Airport Marriott |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,014,680 |
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13%, 12/01/23 |
|
|
670 |
|
|
763,585 |
|
7.50%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
3,953,485 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHS Hospital Corp., 5.50%, 7/01/31 (g) |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,230,425 |
|
Pascack Valley Hospital Association, 6.63%, |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
39 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
3,986,523 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
1,145,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,436,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 6.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
3,899,672 |
|
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
944,630 |
|
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,322,482 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series 2008C, |
|
|
5,685 |
|
|
6,389,940 |
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Airlines Inc., JFK International Airport, AMT, |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
1,809,619 |
|
British Airways Plc Project, AMT, 7.63%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
4,144,414 |
|
Series C, 6.80%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
886,737 |
|
Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series C-1, |
|
|
610 |
|
|
554,868 |
|
Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series C-1, |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
959,915 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
1,271,194 |
|
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, RB, JFK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
1,293,261 |
|
6.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
1,247,058 |
|
Yonkers Industrial Development Agency New York, RB, |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
2,109,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,833,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
North Carolina 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, RB, First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.75%, 3/01/31 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
998,840 |
|
7.75%, 3/01/41 |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
1,388,320 |
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Refunding RB, |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
4,380,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,767,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
2,579,332 |
|
State of Ohio, RB, Ford Motor Co. Project, AMT, 5.75%, |
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
4,493,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,072,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, |
|
|
5,345 |
|
|
3,972,457 |
|
Bucks County IDA, RB, Anns Choice Inc. Facility, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.13%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
1,275,503 |
|
6.25%, 1/01/35 |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
1,355,165 |
|
Cumberland County Municipal Authority, RB, Diakon |
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
5,996,572 |
|
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, RB, Brethren Village |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 7/01/26 |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
1,104,796 |
|
6.50%, 7/01/40 |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
1,548,234 |
|
Montgomery County IDA Pennsylvania, MRB, Whitemarsh |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
1,952,866 |
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
2,687,328 |
|
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Development, 7.75%, 12/01/17 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
8,003,840 |
|
Subordinate, Air Cargo, Series A, 7.50%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
3,599,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,496,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
2,764,745 |
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
4,445 |
|
|
683,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,448,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Falls Detention Facility Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
3,396,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-EDA, Refunding RB, Palmetto Health, |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
1,109,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knox County Health Educational & Housing Facilities |
|
|
5,820 |
|
|
1,010,410 |
|
Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities |
|
|
600 |
|
|
483,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,494,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 12.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bexar County Health Facilities Development Corp., RB, |
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
4,852,966 |
|
Brazos River Authority, Refunding RB, Texas Utility Co., |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
2,135,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Texas (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, 7.48%, 1/01/28 (a) |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
296,330 |
|
CAB, 7.56%, 1/01/29 (a) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
545,360 |
|
CAB, 7.65%, 1/01/30 (a) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
293,237 |
|
CAB, 7.71%, 1/01/31 (a) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
460,180 |
|
CAB, 7.77%, 1/01/32 (a) |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
737,030 |
|
CAB, 7.78%, 1/01/33 (a) |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
714,642 |
|
CAB, 7.79%, 1/01/34 (a) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
715,040 |
|
Senior Lien, 5.75%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
675 |
|
|
666,144 |
|
City of Houston Texas, RB, Special Facilities, Continental |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
4,457,908 |
|
Danbury Higher Education Authority Inc., RB, A.W. Brown |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,150,790 |
|
Harris County Health Facilities Development Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13%, 12/01/31 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,629,135 |
|
7.25%, 12/01/35 |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
1,204,061 |
|
La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp., RB, KIPP Inc., |
|
|
860 |
|
|
845,320 |
|
Love Field Airport Modernization Corp., RB, Southwest |
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
4,005,910 |
|
Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1 Texas, |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
2,172,492 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Special Projects System, Series B, 7.55%, |
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
345,091 |
|
Toll, 2nd Tier, Series F, 6.13%, 1/01/31 |
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
4,520,757 |
|
Sabine River Authority Texas, Refunding RB, TXU |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
3,652,976 |
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Young Memorial Home, , 8.00%, 2/15/38 |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
1,692,353 |
|
Senior Living Center Project, 8.25%, 11/15/44 |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
4,034,478 |
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC, LBJ Freeway Managed |
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
4,539,110 |
|
NTE Mobility Partners LLC, North Tarrant Express |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
4,036,917 |
|
Texas State Public Finance Authority, Refunding, ERB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/28 |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
2,492,893 |
|
5.00%, 2/15/36 |
|
|
850 |
|
|
698,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,895,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Virgin Islands 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Virgin Islands, Refunding RB, Senior |
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
4,933,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Carbon Utah, Refunding RB, Laidlaw |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
3,909,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont Economic Development Authority, Refunding |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,416,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
16 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Virginia 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dulles Town Center Community Development Authority, |
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
$ |
3,518,716 |
|
Fairfax County EDA, Refunding RB, Goodwin House Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 10/01/37 |
|
|
585 |
|
|
501,725 |
|
5.13%, 10/01/42 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
378,000 |
|
Lexington IDA, Refunding MRB, Kendal at Lexington, |
|
|
40 |
|
|
33,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,431,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Castle Place Project, Series A, 7.00%, |
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
2,524,792 |
|
Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare, 5.25%, 8/15/34 |
|
|
6,235 |
|
|
5,332,110 |
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
425 |
|
|
419,942 |
|
7.63%, 9/15/39 |
|
|
855 |
|
|
851,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,128,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 91.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
398,079,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, Series A, |
|
|
6,681 |
|
|
7,311,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB, Miami International |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
14,260,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & |
|
|
7,605 |
|
|
7,932,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (NPFGC), 5.38%, |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
14,406,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
43,910,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
441,990,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.23% (i)(j) |
|
|
1,560,240 |
|
|
1,560,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Michigan Finance Authority, RB, SAN, Detroit Schools, |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
3,421,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
4,981,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $467,993,458*) 103.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
446,972,314 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
10,036,880 |
|
Liability for
Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(23,118,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
433,890,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of April 30, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
444,123,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
14,160,930 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(34,423,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
$ |
(20,262,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(b) |
Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to qualified institutional investors. |
|
|
(c) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default of interest payments. |
|
|
(d) |
Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(e) |
Security represents a beneficial interest in a trust. The collateral deposited into the trust is federally tax-exempt revenue bonds issued by various state or local governments, or their respective agencies or authorities. The security is subject to remarketing prior to its stated maturity. |
|
|
(f) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date. |
|
|
(g) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Goldman Sachs |
|
$ |
1,230,425 |
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
(i) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Affiliate |
|
Shares |
|
Net |
|
Shares |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
|
149,925 |
|
|
1,410,315 |
|
|
1,560,240 |
|
$ |
4,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts sold as of April 30, 2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Issue |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Expiration |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
10-Year U.S. |
|
|
Chicago Board |
|
|
June 2011 |
|
$ |
13,747,592 |
|
$ |
(304,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs are summarized in three broad level for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments) |
|
|
|
|
The inputs or methodologies
used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk
associated with investing in those securities. For information about the
Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial
instruments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1
of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
$ |
441,990,756 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
441,990,756 |
|
Short-Term |
|
$ |
1,560,240 |
|
|
3,421,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,981,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,560,240 |
|
$ |
445,412,074 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
446,972,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
(304,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(304,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
18 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/22 |
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
$ |
2,414,940 |
|
4.75%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
1,771,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,186,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Housing Finance Corp., RB, General Housing, |
|
|
400 |
|
|
402,172 |
|
Borough of Matanuska-Susitna Alaska, RB, Goose Creek |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,330,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,732,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Arizona, COP, Department of Administration, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/27 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
3,296,735 |
|
5.25%, 10/01/28 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,026,650 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/29 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
401,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,725,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 23.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.65%, 10/01/24 |
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
8,160,833 |
|
5.57%, 10/01/25 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
4,717,260 |
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority California, RB, Senior, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,545,400 |
|
Antelope Valley Community College District, GO, Election |
|
|
600 |
|
|
585,792 |
|
Cabrillo Community College District, GO, CAB, Election of |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
384,888 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Joseph Health System, Series A, 5.75%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
514,404 |
|
Sutter Health, Series B, 5.88%, 8/15/31 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,228,776 |
|
California State University, RB, Systemwide, Series A |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
1,284,620 |
|
California State University, Refunding RB, Systemwide, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,817,360 |
|
Chino Valley Unified School District, GO, Election of 2002, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
859,614 |
|
City of Redding California, COP, Refunding, Series A |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
1,409,577 |
|
Fresno Unified School District California, GO, Election of |
|
|
900 |
|
|
869,697 |
|
Los Angeles Community College District California, GO, |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,289,808 |
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, RB, Series C |
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
5,233,633 |
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/29 |
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
3,011,491 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
1,659,799 |
|
Norco Redevelopment Agency California, Tax Allocation |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,312,400 |
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP, Series B (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/01/30 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,536,030 |
|
5.00%, 2/01/31 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
918,414 |
|
Poway Redevelopment Agency California, Tax Allocation |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,415,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacramento Unified School District California, GO, |
|
$ |
4,150 |
|
$ |
4,155,893 |
|
San Diego Unified School District California, GO, CAB, |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
253,280 |
|
San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, RB, |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
2,293,798 |
|
San Mateo County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
3,908,632 |
|
State of California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 6/01/27 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
20,003 |
|
5.13%, 6/01/31 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
59,737 |
|
Stockton Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
5,993,649 |
|
Ventura County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
2,324,814 |
|
West Basin Municipal Water District California, COP, |
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
5,028,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,793,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Covenant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/27 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,098,540 |
|
5.50%, 12/01/33 |
|
|
675 |
|
|
588,404 |
|
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, Refunding |
|
|
315 |
|
|
327,109 |
|
Regional Transportation District, COP, Series A, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,029,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,043,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Series B-1 (NPFGC), |
|
|
5,530 |
|
|
5,154,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 14.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward County School Board Florida, COP, Series A |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,579,248 |
|
City of Tallahassee Florida, RB (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
3,958,360 |
|
Collier County School Board, COP (AGM), 5.00%, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,080,640 |
|
County of Broward Florida, RB, Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
860,906 |
|
County of Duval Florida, COP, Master Lease Program |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,871,900 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, GO, Building Better |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,461,670 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB, Water & Sewer |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
4,803,678 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, Refunding RB, Miami |
|
|
9,900 |
|
|
8,625,078 |
|
County of Orange Florida, Refunding RB, Series B |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
4,139,142 |
|
Highlands County Health Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
1,482,987 |
|
Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Florida, RB, |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,691,322 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
||
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County School Board, COP, Refunding, |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
$ |
1,922,600 |
|
Orange County School Board, COP, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGC), 5.50%, 8/01/34 |
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
3,577,761 |
|
(NPFGC), 5.00%, 8/01/31 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,977,260 |
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, Sarasota |
|
|
275 |
|
|
274,783 |
|
South Florida Water Management District, COP (AGC), |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,081,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,389,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augusta-Richmond County Georgia, RB (AGM), 5.25%, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,312,765 |
|
Gwinnett County Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
825 |
|
|
793,262 |
|
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Refunding RB, |
|
|
7,475 |
|
|
9,384,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,490,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 22.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education Illinois, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGM), 5.50%, 12/01/31 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,231,600 |
|
Chicago School Reform Board, (NPFGC), 5.50%, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,008,140 |
|
Chicago Park District, GO, Harbor Facilities, Series C, |
|
|
550 |
|
|
547,536 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, ARB, General, Third Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGM), 5.75%, 1/01/23 |
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
5,813,167 |
|
(Syncora), 6.00%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,529,200 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, RB, Series A (AGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,906,460 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB, General Airport, |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
9,052,200 |
|
County of Cook Illinois, GO, Capital Improvement, |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
2,648,387 |
|
County of Cook Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
1,350,972 |
|
Illinois Municipal Electric Agency, RB, Series A (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
987,880 |
|
Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, RB, State Tax Supported |
|
|
20,120 |
|
|
20,000,890 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
9,950 |
|
|
2,274,271 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.83%, 6/15/27 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
498,693 |
|
6.25%, 6/15/44 |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
368,150 |
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, RB, 6.00%, |
|
|
675 |
|
|
649,174 |
|
Regional Transportation Authority, RB, Series A (AMBAC), |
|
|
9,480 |
|
|
11,238,540 |
|
State of Illinois, RB, Build Illinois, |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
4,256,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,361,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, RB, Series B, |
|
$ |
400 |
|
$ |
404,100 |
|
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
622,578 |
|
5.50%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
1,854,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,881,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, RB, Series A (AGC), 5.63%, |
|
|
5,725 |
|
|
5,756,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,349,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts HFA, RB, AMT (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Mortgage, Series F, 5.25%, 1/01/46 |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,611,753 |
|
S/F Housing, Series 128, 4.80%, 12/01/27 (d) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,509,664 |
|
Massachusetts HFA, Refunding RB, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Housing, Series A (AGM), 5.15%, 7/01/26 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
669,076 |
|
Series C, 5.35%, 12/01/42 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,050,640 |
|
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Refunding |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
2,747,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,588,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, RB, Series B: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien, (AGM), 6.25%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
425,720 |
|
Second Lien, (AGM), 7.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
224,126 |
|
Senior Lien, (AGM), 7.50%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
816,669 |
|
System, Second Lien, (NPFGC), 5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
3,203,496 |
|
City of Detroit Michigan, Refunding RB, Second Lien, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,555,725 |
|
Kalamazoo Hospital Finance Authority, RB, Bronson |
|
|
425 |
|
|
395,900 |
|
Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,507,710 |
|
Michigan State HDA, RB, Series C, AMT, 5.50%, |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
1,059,157 |
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Refunding RB, Detroit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.50%, 6/01/30 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,245,140 |
|
Series C, 5.45%, 12/15/32 |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
4,045,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,479,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis Minnesota, Refunding RB, Fairview |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,663,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 5.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Carson City Nevada, RB, Carson-Tahoe Hospital |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
2,675,052 |
|
City of Las Vegas Nevada, GO, Limited Tax, Performing |
|
|
850 |
|
|
902,717 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nevada (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Clark Nevada, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series A |
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
$ |
3,566,338 |
|
Southwest Gas Corp. Project, Series A, AMT (FGIC), |
|
|
75 |
|
|
60,991 |
|
Southwest Gas Corp. Project, Series D, AMT (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,060,992 |
|
Subordinate Lien, Series A-2 (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,421,925 |
|
Subordinate Lien, Series A-2 (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
2,898,304 |
|
System, Subordinate Lien, Series C (AGM), |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
1,471,784 |
|
Las Vegas Valley Water District, GO, Refunding, Series A |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,660,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,718,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 9.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cigarette Tax (Radian), 5.50%, 6/15/31 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
523,998 |
|
Cigarette Tax (Radian), 5.75%, 6/15/34 |
|
|
305 |
|
|
270,169 |
|
Motor Vehicle Surcharge, Series A (NPFGC), 5.25%, |
|
|
9,325 |
|
|
9,337,775 |
|
Motor Vehicle Surcharge, Series A (NPFGC), 5.25%, |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
7,748,910 |
|
School Facilities Construction, Series O, 5.13%, |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
2,258,010 |
|
School Facilities Construction, Series Z (AGC), |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,108,560 |
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding RB, School Facilities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,348,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,596,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erie County Industrial Development Agency, RB, City |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,615,680 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series 2008C, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,496,000 |
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB, Fiscal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/15/33 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,662,992 |
|
5.50%, 1/15/34 |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
2,852,905 |
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, ERB, Series B, |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,296,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,923,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, RB, Novant |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,375,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Lucas Ohio, Refunding RB, Promedica |
|
|
530 |
|
|
552,991 |
|
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, Refunding |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
964,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,517,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pennsylvania 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania HFA, Refunding RB, Series 99A, AMT, |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
$ |
1,458,585 |
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Sub-Series E, 6.48%, 12/01/38 (a) |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
1,899,040 |
|
Subordinate, Special Motor License Fund, 6.00%, |
|
|
575 |
|
|
617,895 |
|
Philadelphia School District, GO, Series E, 6.00%, |
|
|
400 |
|
|
413,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,388,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
3,316,864 |
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series A (NPFGC), 5.69%, 8/01/41 (b) |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
1,135,600 |
|
First Sub-Series C, 6.00%, 8/01/39 |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,183,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,635,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., |
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
2,548,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-EDA, Refunding RB, Palmetto |
|
|
240 |
|
|
243,557 |
|
South Carolina State Public Service Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,048,340 |
|
South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank, RB, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,960,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,251,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knox County Health Educational & Housing Facilities |
|
|
600 |
|
|
103,806 |
|
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,497,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,601,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 12.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Houston Texas, Refunding RB, Combined, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 11/15/35 |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
2,300,193 |
|
5.38%, 11/15/38 |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
1,391,270 |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Facilities |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
12,465,960 |
|
Lewisville ISD Texas, GO, Refunding, CAB, School |
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
2,339,664 |
|
Mansfield ISD Texas, GO, School Building (PSF-GTD), |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
1,775,543 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, RB (AGC), System, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series K-1, 5.75%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
3,841,914 |
|
Series K-2, 6.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
4,111,159 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Refunding RB, First Tier: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 6.00%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
2,951,017 |
|
System, (NPFGC), 5.75%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,553,936 |
|
Texas State Turnpike Authority, RB, First Tier, Series A |
|
|
5,150 |
|
|
4,827,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,558,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Utah 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah Transit Authority, RB, Series A (AGM), 5.00%, |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
$ |
5,056,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (NPFGC), 5.35%, |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
1,530,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
799,119 |
|
5.25%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
576,556 |
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Refunding |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
2,785,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,160,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
1,293,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 125.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
381,753,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp., RB, Junior Lien, |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,222,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 5.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
959 |
|
|
957,023 |
|
Los Angeles Community College District California, GO, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,480,400 |
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP (NPFGC), |
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
7,482,947 |
|
San Diego Community College District California, GO, |
|
|
404 |
|
|
410,538 |
|
San Diego County Water Authority, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
2,813,288 |
|
Tamalpais Union High School District California, GO, |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
1,608,290 |
|
University of California, RB, Series O, 5.75%, 5/15/34 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
893,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,646,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
900 |
|
|
900,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
1,093,058 |
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, Series A, |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
1,937,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,030,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 6.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Tallahassee Florida Energy System, RB (NPFGC), |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
7,285,500 |
|
Florida State Board of Education, GO, Series D, 5.00%, |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
1,361,360 |
|
Miami-Dade County School Board, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
9,613,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,259,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Georgia 5.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta Georgia, RB, General, Series B (AGM), |
|
$ |
17,356 |
|
$ |
17,369,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, RB, Series B, |
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
1,900,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Louisiana Gas & Fuels, RB, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
5,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts School Building Authority, RB, Series A |
|
|
10,600 |
|
|
10,857,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Las Vegas Nevada, GO, Limited Tax, Performing |
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
3,989,397 |
|
Clark County Water Reclamation District, GO, Series B: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
4,499 |
|
|
4,771,549 |
|
5.75%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
1,971,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,732,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority, |
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
7,557,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water & Sewer Finance Authority, |
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
1,351,563 |
|
New York State Thruway Authority, RB, Series G (AGM), |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
3,118,321 |
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, RB, General, |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,330,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,799,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Ohio, RB, Cleveland Clinic Health, Series B, |
|
|
580 |
|
|
576,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charleston Educational Excellence Finance Corp., RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 12/01/28 |
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
3,184,802 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/29 |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
2,812,171 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
1,023,080 |
|
South Carolina State Public Service Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
1,336,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,356,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Creek ISD Texas, GO, Refunding, School Building |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,296,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfax County IDA
Virginia, Refunding RB, Health Care, |
|
|
350 |
|
|
351,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, RB, |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
4,077,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
1,308,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
116,645,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
498,398,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.23% (g)(h) |
|
|
3,470,954 |
|
$ |
3,470,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $509,788,827*) 165.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
501,869,162 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
5,624,385 |
|
Liability
for Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(61,641,263 |
) |
AMPS, at Redemption Value (47.0)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(142,588,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
303,263,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of April 30, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
448,710,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
8,551,270 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(16,975,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
$ |
(8,423,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents a step-up bond that pays an initial coupon rate for the first period and then a higher coupon rate for the following periods. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(c) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
(d) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date. |
|
|
(e) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Merrill Lynch and Co., Inc. |
|
$ |
243,557 |
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
(g) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares |
|
Net |
|
Shares |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
|
7,207,423 |
|
|
(3,736,469 |
) |
|
3,470,954 |
|
$ |
9,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts sold as of April 30, 2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
Issue |
|
Exchange |
|
Expiration |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
170 |
|
10-Year U.S. |
|
Chicago Board |
|
June 2011 |
|
$ |
20,147,333 |
|
$ |
(446,573 |
) |
|
|
|
Treasury Note |
|
of Trade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments) |
The inputs or methodologies
used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk
associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Funds
policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments
and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes
to Financial Statements.
The following tables summarize the inputs used as of
April 30, 2011 in determining the fair valuation of the Funds investments and
derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
$ |
498,398,208 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
498,398,208 |
|
Short-Term |
|
$ |
3,470,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,470,954 |
|
$ |
498,398,208 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
501,869,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
(446,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(446,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2011 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (MHD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|||||||
Alabama 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A, 5.00%, |
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
$ |
3,878,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 4.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County IDA Arizona, RB, Arizona Charter |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
1,449,778 |
|
Phoenix IDA Arizona, Refunding RB, America West |
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
1,836,612 |
|
Pima County IDA, Refunding IDRB, Tucson Electric Power, |
|
|
770 |
|
|
767,682 |
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
1,381,508 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,722,780 |
|
5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
1,955,944 |
|
Show Low Improvement District, Special Assessment |
|
|
260 |
|
|
260,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,374,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Little River Arkansas, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
1,061,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 16.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, RB, 5.60%, |
|
|
255 |
|
|
248,640 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Joseph Health System, Series A, 5.75%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
1,430,978 |
|
Sutter Health, Series B, 6.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,231,042 |
|
California State Public Works Board, RB, Various Capital |
|
|
820 |
|
|
847,134 |
|
California Statewide Communities Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Facility, Memorial Health Services, Series A, |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
3,972,710 |
|
John Muir Health, 5.13%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
1,365,372 |
|
Los Angeles Department of Airports, RB, Series A, |
|
|
555 |
|
|
552,564 |
|
Los Angeles Department of Airports, Refunding RB, |
|
|
4,115 |
|
|