UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21348
Name of Fund: BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MUI)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: Anne F. Ackerley, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 04/30/2010
Date of reporting period: 04/30/2010
Item 1 – Report to Stockholders
|
|
Annual Report |
|
|
|
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX)
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA)
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN)
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (MHD)
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. (MUH)
BlackRock MuniHoldings Insured Fund, Inc. (MUS)
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MUI)
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. (MVT)
NOT FDIC INSURED
MAY LOSE VALUE
NO BANK GUARANTEE
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Annual Report: |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
||
2 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Although overall global economic and financial conditions have generally improved over the past year, the period ended with high levels of market volatility and diminishing investor confidence sparked by the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, concerns over the strength of the economic recovery and uncertainty surrounding the future of interest rate policies. Additionally, as the period drew to a close, the increasing likelihood of more stringent financial market regulations added to the overall sense of investment uncertainty. Despite the uneven nature of recent market conditions, we continue to believe that the Great Recession likely ended at some point last summer, thanks primarily to massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, and that the global economy remains in recovery mode.
Global equity markets bottomed in early 2009 and since that time have moved unevenly higher as investors were lured back into the markets by depressed valuations, desire for higher yields and improvements in corporate earnings prospects. There have been several corrections along the way and volatility levels have remained elevated reflections of mixed economic data, lingering deflation issues (especially in Europe) and uncertainty surrounding financial regulations. On balance, however, improving corporate revenues and profits and a positive macro backdrop helped push stock prices higher over the last twelve and six months. From a geographic perspective, US equities have outpaced their international counterparts in recent months, as the domestic economic recovery has been more pronounced and as credit-related issues have held European markets down.
Within fixed income markets, yields have been moving unevenly as improving economic conditions have been acting to push Treasury yields higher (and prices correspondingly lower), while concerns over ongoing deflation threats have acted as a counterweight. As the period drew to a close, Treasury yields were falling as investors flocked to the safe haven asset class in the face of escalating uncertainty. Over the course of the last twelve and six months, however, Treasuries underperformed other areas of the bond market, particularly the high yield sector, which has been benefiting from increased investor demand. Meanwhile, municipal bonds slightly outperformed taxable sectors over both the six- and twelve-month periods thanks to continued high demand levels, but have continued to face the headwinds of ongoing state and local budget problems. As in the taxable arena, high yield municipals have been outperforming the rest of the market.
Regarding cash investments, yields on money market securities remain near all-time lows (producing returns only marginally above zero percent), with the Federal Open Market Committee reiterating that economic circumstances are likely to necessitate an accommodative interest rate stance for an extended period.
Against this backdrop, the major market averages posted the following returns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 |
|
6-month |
|
12-month |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US equities (S&P 500 Index) |
|
|
15.66 |
% |
|
38.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small cap US equities (Russell 2000 Index) |
|
|
28.17 |
|
|
48.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International equities (MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index) |
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
34.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-month Treasury bill (BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month Treasury Bill Index) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities (BofA Merrill Lynch 10-Year US Treasury Index) |
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
(1.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable fixed income (Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index) |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
8.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt fixed income (Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index) |
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
8.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High yield bonds (Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index) |
|
|
11.60 |
|
|
42.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
Global financial markets continue to show signs of improvement, but questions about the strength and sustainability of the recovery abound. Through periods of uncertainty, as ever, BlackRocks full resources are dedicated to the management of our clients assets. For additional market perspective and investment insight, visit www.blackrock.com/shareholdermagazine, where youll find the most recent issue of our award-winning Shareholder® magazine, as well as its quarterly companion newsletter, Shareholder Perspectives. As always, we thank you for entrusting BlackRock with your investments, and we look forward to your continued partnership in the months and years ahead.
|
Sincerely, |
Rob Kapito |
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with high current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of medium- to lower-grade or unrated municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 22.73% based on market price and 27.99% based on net asset value (NAV). For the same period, the closed-end Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 34.42% on a market price basis and 31.62% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a premium to NAV to a discount by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Positive performance was derived primarily from sector allocation decisions and included concentrations in transportation, health care and corporate-related debt, which continue to benefit from the relative outperformance of these sectors. In light of positive returns in the municipal market, portfolio duration positioning has also proven beneficial, reflecting recent moves to modestly increase the portfolios sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations. Negative factors included underweight positioning in the tax-backed, public utility and the county/city/special district/school district sectors, which staged a modest rebound late in the reporting period. In addition, the ongoing compression in credit spreads remains pronounced with respect to non-rated bonds, in which the Fund maintains below market weight exposure. More significantly, a majority of peers within the Lipper category employ a higher degree of leverage, which can enhance both returns and distribution yields.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) |
|
|
APX |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
July 25, 1989 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($8.87)1 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
9.15% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.044 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.528 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents tender option bond trusts (TOBs) as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
8.87 |
|
$ |
7.72 |
|
|
14.90 |
% |
$ |
9.29 |
|
$ |
7.46 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
9.19 |
|
$ |
7.67 |
|
|
19.82 |
% |
$ |
9.19 |
|
$ |
7.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
29 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
20 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
16 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Education |
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
State |
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Housing |
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
7 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
A |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
26 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
8 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
B |
|
7 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
35 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of Standard & Poors (S&Ps) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $14,523,630 representing 8% and $8,923,111 representing 6%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of medium- to lower-grade or unrated municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 24.17% based on market price and 27.72% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 34.42% on a market price basis and 31.62% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds premium to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Positive performance was derived primarily from sector allocation decisions and included concentrations in transportation, health care and corporate-related debt, which continue to benefit from the relative outperformance of these sectors. In light of positive returns in the municipal market, portfolio duration positioning has also proven beneficial, reflecting recent moves to modestly increase the portfolios sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations. Negative factors included underweight positioning in the tax-backed, public utility and the county/city/special district/school district sectors, which staged a modest rebound late in the reporting period. In addition, the ongoing compression in credit spreads remains pronounced with respect to non-rated bonds, in which the Fund maintains below market weight exposure. More significantly, a majority of peers within the Lipper category employ a higher degree of leverage, which can enhance both returns and distribution yields.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MUA |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
June 25, 1993 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($12.65)1 |
|
|
5.93% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
9.12% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0625 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.7500 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
$ |
10.91 |
|
|
15.95 |
% |
$ |
12.78 |
|
$ |
10.64 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
12.63 |
|
$ |
10.59 |
|
|
19.26 |
% |
$ |
12.63 |
|
$ |
10.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
29 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
24 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
13 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Education |
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
5 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
State |
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
4 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Housing |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
6 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
A |
|
14 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
26 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
B |
|
7 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
CC/Ca |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
32 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $15,867,930 representing 6% and $12,884,659 representing 6%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 29.59% based on market price and 18.76% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 24.79% on a market price basis and 15.40% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Among the factors that contributed to Fund performance during the reporting period were the Funds constructive position toward the market during a period of declining yields; exposure to the long end of the yield curve during a period of curve flattening; a general tightening of credit spreads, which drove performance in the Funds holdings of insured bonds with weaker underlying credits; and the Funds concentration in the transportation and housing sectors, which outperformed during the period. Conversely, lower relative exposure to the public utility and education sectors detracted from Fund performance as both segments performed well. The Funds holdings of zero-coupon bonds also detracted from performance as spreads in this sector generally underperformed relative to spreads on coupon bonds.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MEN |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
March 2, 1989 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($10.81)1 |
|
|
6.33% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
9.74% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.057 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.684 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
|
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Auction Market Preferred Shares (Preferred Shares) and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
10.81 |
|
$ |
8.88 |
|
|
21.73 |
% |
$ |
10.85 |
|
$ |
8.59 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
10.90 |
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
|
11.57 |
% |
$ |
11.16 |
|
$ |
9.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
28 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
Transportation |
|
24 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
State |
|
19 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
14 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Health |
|
7 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Housing |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Education |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
46 |
% |
|
45 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
23 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
A |
|
26 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (MHD) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuers, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 40.68% based on market price and 27.31% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 28.13% on a market price basis and 22.67% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Positive performance was attributable in part to sector allocation decisions and included concentrations in health care, housing, county/city/special district/school district and corporate-related debt, which all performed well. Increasing risk appetite has also proven beneficial given the portfolios focus on lower-rated credits. Additionally, portfolio positioning with respect to a modestly long duration stance and an emphasis on longer-dated bonds was additive in an environment where yields on the long end of the curve fell substantially. Negative factors included underweight positioning in the tax-backed, public utilities and tobacco sectors, portions of which have performed well on a relative basis.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
MHD |
Initial Offering Date |
|
May 2, 1997 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($15.70)1 |
|
6.57% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
10.11% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.086 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$1.032 |
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
36% |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Market Price |
|
|
$ |
15.70 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.97 |
|
|
|
|
31.16 |
% |
|
|
$ |
15.90 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.88 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
|
$ |
15.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
|
|
|
18.69 |
% |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
23 |
% |
|
19 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
State |
|
12 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
11 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
11 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Education |
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Housing |
|
7 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
19 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
32 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
A |
|
23 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
11 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
B |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
9 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $2,973,600 representing 1% and $6,532,075 representing 2%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. (MUH) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 38.64% based on market price and 25.71% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 28.13% on a market price basis and 22.67% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a discount to NAV to a premium by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Positive performance was attributable in part to sector allocation decisions and included concentrations in health care, housing, county/city/special district/school district and corporate-related debt, which all performed well. Increasing risk appetite has also proven beneficial given the portfolios focus on lower-rated credits. Additionally, portfolio positioning with respect to a modestly long duration stance and an emphasis on longer-dated bonds was additive in an environment where yields on the long end of the curve fell substantially. Negative factors included underweight positioning in the tax-backed, public utilities and tobacco sectors, portions of which have performed well on a relative basis.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
MUH |
Initial Offering Date |
|
February 27, 1998 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($14.68)1 |
|
6.58% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
10.12% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0805 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.9660 |
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
35% |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Market Price |
|
|
$ |
14.68 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.33 |
|
|
29.57 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14.69 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.27 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
|
$ |
14.65 |
|
|
|
$ |
12.47 |
|
|
17.48 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14.72 |
|
|
|
$ |
12.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
21 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
15 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
State |
|
12 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Education |
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
10 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Housing |
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
18 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
37 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
A |
|
20 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
12 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
B |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $4,406,945 representing 2% and $4,974,331 representing 2%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Insured Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Insured Fund, Inc. (MUS) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuers, is exempt from federal income taxes. Under normal circumstances, the Fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in municipal bonds that are covered by insurance.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 31.59% based on market price and 16.05% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 24.79% on a market price basis and 15.40% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a discount to NAV to a premium by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Notable positions in health care and housing bonds enhanced the Funds performance for the period. In both sectors, the maturity range of the Funds holdings was 20 years and longer, and they subsequently benefited from the flattening of the yield curve during the past 12 months. Conversely, the Funds insured holdings, with weak underlying credits, detracted from performance for the period.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
MUS |
Initial Offering Date |
|
May 1, 1998 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($13.40)1 |
|
6.63% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
10.20% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.074 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.888 |
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
41% |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Market Price |
|
|
$ |
13.40 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.87 |
|
|
23.28 |
% |
|
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.73 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
|
8.72 |
% |
|
|
$ |
13.81 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
33 |
% |
|
42 |
% |
|
Utilities |
|
22 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
State |
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Health |
|
9 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Housing |
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
58 |
% |
|
50 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
16 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
A |
|
24 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $2,342,435 representing 1% and $3,333,138 representing 1%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MUI) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with high current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 27.29% based on market price and 19.85% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 22.05% on a market price basis and 15.50% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The Fund benefited from a tightening of credit spreads, specifically within the corporate high yield sector, which helped the Funds lower-quality holdings outperform. In addition, we actively structured new-issue deals with discounted coupons at the longer end of the Funds duration range. These holdings benefited from the outperformance of the new-issue market, the flattening of the yield curve and the reduced supply of tax-exempt issuance due to Build America Bonds (BAB) issuance. We also diversified the Funds holdings to increase exposure to specialty-state paper, which outperformed as a result of increased demand by retail buyers. Finally, the Fund benefited from an above-average yield relative to its Lipper group peers. Conversely, the Funds shorter maturity holdings, as well as its bonds with greater negative convexity, underperformed the market.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MUI |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
August 1, 2003 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($14.13)1 |
|
|
5.56% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
8.55% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.0655 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.7860 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
3 |
The Monthly Distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2010, was increased to $0.0680. The Yield on Closing Market Price, Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share and Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to further change in the future. |
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Market Price |
|
|
$ |
14.13 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.77 |
|
|
20.05 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.51 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
13.05 |
|
|
13.03 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14.79 |
|
|
|
$ |
13.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
State |
|
23 |
% |
|
23 |
% |
|
City/County/Special District/School District |
|
21 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
12 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Health |
|
12 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
8 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
8 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Education |
|
6 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Housing |
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
28 |
% |
|
36 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
25 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
A |
|
23 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
7 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $11,900,188 representing 1% and $16,548,864 representing 2%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. (MVT) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuers, is exempt from federal income taxes.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
Performance |
|
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2010, the Fund returned 37.99% based on market price and 29.75% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 28.13% on a market price basis and 22.67% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a discount to NAV to a premium by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Positive performance was attributable in part to sector allocation decisions and included concentrations in health care, housing, development districts and corporate-related debt, which all performed well. Increasing risk appetite has also proven beneficial given the portfolios focus on lower-rated credits. Additionally, portfolio positioning with respect to a modestly long duration stance and an emphasis on longer-dated bonds was additive in an environment where yields on the long end of the curve fell substantially. Negative factors included underweight positioning in the tax-backed, public utilities and education sectors, all of which have performed well on a relative basis.
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
|
MVT |
|
Initial Offering Date |
|
|
March 29, 1993 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2010 ($14.94)1 |
|
|
6.91% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
|
10.63% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$0.086 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
|
$1.032 |
|
Leverage as of April 30, 20104 |
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 12. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Market Price |
|
|
$ |
14.94 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.65 |
|
|
28.24 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14.94 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.54 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.95 |
|
|
20.59 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14.55 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health |
|
22 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
18 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
State |
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
10 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Education |
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Housing |
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AAA/Aaa |
|
18 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
39 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
A |
|
18 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
B |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
10 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities to be of investment grade quality. As of April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $5,505,082 representing 1% and $10,825,769 representing 3%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
11 |
|
|
|
The Funds may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and NAV of their Common Shares. However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.
To leverage, all of the Funds, except APX and MUA, issue Preferred Shares, which pay dividends at prevailing short-term interest rates, and invest the proceeds in long-term municipal bonds. In general, the concept of leveraging is based on the premise that the cost of assets to be obtained from leverage will be based on short-term interest rates, which normally will be lower than the income earned by each Fund on its longer-term portfolio investments. To the extent that the total assets of each Fund (including the assets obtained from leverage) are invested in higher-yielding portfolio investments, each Funds Common Shareholders will benefit from the incremental net income.
To illustrate these concepts, assume a Funds Common Shares capitalization is $100 million and it issues Preferred Shares for an additional $50 million, creating a total value of $150 million available for investment in long-term municipal bonds. If prevailing short-term interest rates are 3% and long-term interest rates are 6%, the yield curve has a strongly positive slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the $50 million of Preferred Shares based on the lower short-term interest rates. At the same time, the securities purchased by the Fund with assets received from the Preferred Shares issuance earn the income based on long-term interest rates. In this case, the dividends paid to Preferred Shareholders are significantly lower than the income earned on the Funds long-term investments, and therefore the Common Shareholders are the beneficiaries of the incremental net income.
If short-term interest rates rise, narrowing the differential between short-term and long-term interest rates, the incremental net income pickup on the Common Shares will be reduced or eliminated completely. Furthermore, if prevailing short-term interest rates rise above long-term interest rates of 6%, the yield curve has a negative slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the higher short-term interest rates whereas the Funds total portfolio earns income based on lower long-term interest rates.
Furthermore, the value of a Funds portfolio investments generally varies inversely with the direction of long-term interest rates, although other factors can influence the value of portfolio investments. In contrast, the redemption value of the Funds Preferred Shares does not fluctuate in relation to interest rates. As a result, changes in interest rates can influence the Funds NAV positively or negatively in addition to the impact on Fund performance from leverage from Preferred Shares discussed above.
The Funds may also leverage their assets through the use of tender option bond (TOB) programs, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. TOB investments generally will provide the Funds with economic benefits in periods of declining short-term interest rates, but expose the Funds to risks during periods of rising short-term interest rates similar to those associated with Preferred Shares issued by the Funds, as described above. Additionally, fluctuations in the market value of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB trust may adversely affect each Funds NAV per share.
The use of leverage may enhance opportunities for increased income to the Funds and Common Shareholders, but as described above, it also creates risks as short- or long-term interest rates fluctuate. Leverage also will generally cause greater changes in the Funds NAV, market price and dividend rate than a comparable portfolio without leverage. If the income derived from securities purchased with assets received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Funds net income will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the securities purchased is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, each Funds net income will be less than if leverage had not been used, and therefore the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be reduced. The Funds may be required to sell portfolio securities at inopportune times or at distressed values in order to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to the use of leverage or as required by the terms of leverage instruments, which may cause a Fund to incur losses. The use of leverage may limit each Funds ability to invest in certain types of securities or use certain types of hedging strategies, such as in the case of certain restrictions imposed by ratings agencies that rate preferred shares issued by the Funds. Each Fund will incur expenses in connection with the use of leverage, all of which are borne by Common Shareholders and may reduce income to the Common Shares.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Funds are permitted to issue Preferred Shares in an amount up to 50% of their total managed assets at the time of issuance. Under normal circumstances, each Fund anticipates that the total economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs will not exceed 50% of its total managed assets at the time such leverage is incurred. As of April 30, 2010, the Funds had economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs as a percentage of their total managed assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Percent
of |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
APX |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
MUA |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
MEN |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
MHD |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
MUH |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
MUS |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
MUI |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
MVT |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Funds may invest in various derivative instruments, including financial futures contracts, as specified in Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements, which may constitute forms of economic leverage. Such instruments are used to obtain exposure to a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities or to hedge market and/or interest rate risks. Such derivative instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of a derivative instrument and the underlying asset to the transaction or illiquidity of the derivative instrument. Each Funds ability to successfully use a derivative instrument depends on the investment advisors ability to accurately predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. The use of derivative instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require a Fund to sell or purchase portfolio securities at inopportune times or for distressed values, may limit the amount of appreciation a Fund can realize on an investment or may cause a Fund to hold a security that it might otherwise sell. The Funds investments in these instruments are discussed in detail in the Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 1/01/13 |
|
$ |
435 |
|
$ |
412,328 |
|
5.25%, 1/01/17 |
|
|
365 |
|
|
330,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, RB, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,925,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County IDA Arizona, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Charter Schools Project, 6.63%, 7/01/20 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
847,495 |
|
Sun King Apartments Project, 6.00%, 11/01/10 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4,969 |
|
Phoenix IDA Arizona, Refunding RB, America West |
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
2,306,988 |
|
Pima County IDA, RB, Arizona Charter Schools Project, |
|
|
960 |
|
|
963,571 |
|
Pima County IDA, Refunding IDRB, Tucson Electric Power, |
|
|
460 |
|
|
468,087 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior, 5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
1,768,533 |
|
University Medical Center Corp. Arizona, RB, 6.25%, |
|
|
540 |
|
|
574,814 |
|
Yavapai County IDA Arizona, RB, Yavapai Regional |
|
|
500 |
|
|
502,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,437,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 4.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Baptist Homes of the West, 6.25%, |
|
|
885 |
|
|
879,053 |
|
Senior Living, Southern California, 7.00%, |
|
|
400 |
|
|
429,628 |
|
Senior Living, Southern California, 7.25%, |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
1,561,651 |
|
City of Fontana California, Special Tax Bonds, Refunding, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
955,630 |
|
State of California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
1,572,585 |
|
Various Purpose, 6.00%, 3/01/33 |
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
2,333,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,732,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elk Valley Public Improvement Corp., RB, Public |
|
$ |
2,800 |
|
$ |
2,737,896 |
|
Plaza Metropolitan District No. 1 Colorado, Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Improvement Fee, 8.00%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,002,240 |
|
Subordinate Public Improvement Fee, 8.13%, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
476,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,217,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harbor Point Infrastructure Improvement District, Tax |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
1,686,298 |
|
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut, RB, Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 1/01/31 |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
1,434,890 |
|
5.25%, 1/01/33 (a) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,072,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,193,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Methodist Home District of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.38%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
689,377 |
|
7.50%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
1,126,351 |
|
District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., |
|
|
730 |
|
|
716,305 |
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
9,770 |
|
|
1,691,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,223,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 9.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Region Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
630 |
|
|
590,852 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, Refunding RB, Miami |
|
|
360 |
|
|
364,136 |
|
Hillsborough County IDA, RB, AMT, National Gypsum Co.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 7.13%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,177,525 |
|
Series B, 7.13%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
1,358,776 |
|
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission, RB, |
|
|
900 |
|
|
695,916 |
|
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission, |
|
|
840 |
|
|
856,876 |
|
Lee County IDA Florida, RB, Series A, Lee Charter |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
1,385,247 |
|
|
|
Portfolio Abbreviations |
|
To simplify the listings of portfolio holdings in the Schedules of Investments, the names and descriptions of many of the securities have been abbreviated according to the following list:
|
|
ACA |
American Capital Access Corp. |
AGC |
Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AGM |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AMBAC |
American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
AMT |
Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to) |
ARB |
Airport Revenue Bonds |
BHAC |
Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. |
CAB |
Capital Appreciation Bonds |
COP |
Certificates of Participation |
EDA |
Economic Development Authority |
EDC |
Economic Development Corp. |
ERB |
Education Revenue Bonds |
FGIC |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHA |
Federal Housing Administration |
GNMA |
Government National Mortgage Association |
GO |
General Obligation Bonds |
HDA |
Housing Development Authority |
HFA |
Housing Finance Agency |
HRB |
Housing Revenue Bonds |
HUD |
US Department of Housing and |
|
Urban Development |
IDA |
Industrial Development Authority |
IDB |
Industrial Development Board |
IDRB |
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds |
ISD |
Independent School District |
M/F |
Multi-Family |
MRB |
Mortgage Revenue Bonds |
NPFGC |
National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
PSF-GTD |
Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
RB |
Revenue Bonds |
S/F |
Single-Family |
TE |
Tax-Exempt |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Florida (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Community Development District, Special |
|
$ |
345 |
|
$ |
323,724 |
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 5/01/24 |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
1,313,707 |
|
6.25%, 5/01/37 |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
1,266,651 |
|
Santa Rosa Bay Bridge Authority, RB, 6.25%, 7/01/28 |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
1,165,337 |
|
Sarasota County Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/27 |
|
|
590 |
|
|
536,003 |
|
5.50%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
487,652 |
|
Sumter Landing Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
1,264,222 |
|
Tampa Palms Open Space & Transportation Community |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
1,905,152 |
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Special |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
1,472,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,164,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, Princeton |
|
|
395 |
|
|
346,731 |
|
Clayton County Development Authority, RB, Delta Air |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
1,466,877 |
|
County of Clayton Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
1,558,836 |
|
DeKalb County Hospital Authority Georgia, RB, |
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
1,805,505 |
|
Gainesville & Hall County Development Authority, |
|
|
645 |
|
|
670,142 |
|
Rockdale County Development Authority, RB, Visy Paper |
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
1,549,330 |
|
Thomasville Hospital Authority, RB, Anticipation |
|
|
210 |
|
|
208,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,605,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam Government Waterworks Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/01/25 |
|
|
515 |
|
|
526,170 |
|
5.88%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
800 |
|
|
784,776 |
|
Territory of Guam, GO, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 11/15/19 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
258,803 |
|
6.75%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
467,966 |
|
7.00%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
485,867 |
|
Territory of Guam, RB, Section 30, Series A, 5.63%, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,018,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,542,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB, American |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
2,124,694 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clare at Water Tower Project, Series A, 6.13%, |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
817,806 |
|
Roosevelt University Project, 6.50%, 4/01/44 |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,782,807 |
|
Rush University Medical Center Obligation Group, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,277,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Illinois (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friendship Village of Schaumburg, 7.25%, 2/15/45 |
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
$ |
1,617,465 |
|
Primary Health Care Centers Program, 6.60%, |
|
|
490 |
|
|
435,968 |
|
Village of Lincolnshire Illinois, Special Tax Bonds, |
|
|
755 |
|
|
609,783 |
|
Village of Wheeling Illinois, Tax Allocation Bonds, North |
|
|
750 |
|
|
684,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,350,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Improvement, |
|
|
620 |
|
|
624,625 |
|
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Financing |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
1,723,856 |
|
Vigo County Hospital Authority Indiana, RB, Union |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70%, 9/01/37 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
382,167 |
|
5.75%, 9/01/42 |
|
|
545 |
|
|
466,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,197,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 6.38%, 6/01/40 |
|
|
645 |
|
|
663,060 |
|
Series B, 6.38%, 3/01/40 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
632,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,295,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,056,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland EDC, RB, Transportation Facilities Project, |
|
|
420 |
|
|
429,001 |
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
410 |
|
|
176,308 |
|
Maryland State Energy Financing Administration, RB, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,500,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,105,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, RB, |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
1,584,597 |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Refunding |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
975,519 |
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
832,813 |
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
444,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,837,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Technology Academy, RB, 6.00%, 11/01/37 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
558,200 |
|
County of Wayne Michigan, GO, Building Improvement, |
|
|
375 |
|
|
395,531 |
|
Monroe County Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
1,037,975 |
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority Michigan, |
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
3,039,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,031,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Missouri 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas City IDA Missouri, RB, First Mortgage, Bishop |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
887,200 |
|
Kirkwood IDA Missouri, RB, Aberdeen Heights, Series A, |
|
|
945 |
|
|
940,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,828,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-State 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 7.50%, |
|
|
672 |
|
|
623,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Clark Nevada, Special Assessment Bonds, |
|
|
380 |
|
|
359,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority, |
|
|
835 |
|
|
709,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Continental Airlines Inc. Project, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.63%, 9/15/12 |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
3,081,537 |
|
6.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
938,100 |
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding RB, Newark Airport Marriott |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,501,920 |
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13%, 12/01/23 |
|
|
670 |
|
|
774,078 |
|
7.50%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
1,219,755 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
19 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
1,722,873 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
591,827 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. New Jersey, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 6/01/23 |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
1,958,037 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/41 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
594,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,382,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., RB, Barclays |
|
|
685 |
|
|
701,591 |
|
Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
1,738,506 |
|
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
993,870 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series 2008-C, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,322,580 |
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Airlines Inc., JFK International Airport, |
|
|
720 |
|
|
750,146 |
|
British Airways Plc Project, AMT, 7.63%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
1,710,555 |
|
Series C, 6.80%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
367,993 |
|
Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series C-1, |
|
|
830 |
|
|
771,178 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, National Sports |
|
|
630 |
|
|
6 |
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, North Shore-Long |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,024,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New York (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yonkers Industrial Development Agency New York, RB, |
|
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
886,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,267,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
3,206,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 6/01/24 |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
1,030,635 |
|
6.50%, 6/01/47 |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
2,203,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,234,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania 6.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, |
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
1,914,034 |
|
Bucks County IDA, RB, Anns Choice Inc. Facility, |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
1,098,184 |
|
Cumberland County Municipal Authority, RB, Diakon |
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
2,528,800 |
|
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, RB, Brethren |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 7/01/26 |
|
|
475 |
|
|
474,468 |
|
6.50%, 7/01/40 |
|
|
410 |
|
|
397,839 |
|
Montgomery County IDA Pennsylvania, MRB, Whitemarsh |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,260,176 |
|
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
470 |
|
|
453,400 |
|
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Development, 7.75%, 12/01/17 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,003,270 |
|
Subordinate, Air Cargo, Series A, 7.50%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,524,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,654,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
985 |
|
|
1,005,784 |
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,129,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Falls Detention Facility Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,501,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connector 2000 Association Inc., RB, CAB, Senior |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
177,375 |
|
South Carolina Jobs, EDA, Refunding RB, Palmetto |
|
|
670 |
|
|
664,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities |
|
|
245 |
|
|
209,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Texas 10.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bexar County Health Facilities Development Corp., RB, |
|
$ |
2,055 |
|
$ |
2,074,831 |
|
Brazos River Authority, Refunding RB, Texas Utility Co., |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
1,506,615 |
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, 7.48%, 1/01/28 (b) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
282,670 |
|
CAB, 7.78%, 1/01/33 (b) |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
410,435 |
|
CAB, 7.79%, 1/01/34 (b) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
708,200 |
|
Senior Lien, 5.75%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
454,612 |
|
City of Houston Texas, RB, Special Facilities, Continental |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
1,858,566 |
|
Danbury Higher Education Authority Inc., RB, A.W. Brown |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,133,290 |
|
Harris County Health Facilities Development Corp., |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
1,251,159 |
|
Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1 Texas, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
920,142 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, RB, Toll, 2nd Tier, Series F, |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
1,759,791 |
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Young Memorial Home, 8.00%, 2/15/38 |
|
|
710 |
|
|
702,218 |
|
Senior Living Center Project, 8.25%, 11/15/44 |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
1,692,541 |
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
1,676,776 |
|
Texas State Public Finance Authority, Refunding ERB, |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
2,068,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,499,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Virgin Islands 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Virgin Islands, Refunding RB, Senior |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
2,127,384 |
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, RB, Senior Lien, |
|
|
340 |
|
|
321,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,449,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Carbon Utah, Refunding RB, Laidlaw |
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
2,244,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dulles Town Center Community Development Authority, |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
2,206,627 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Virginia, Refunding |
|
|
4,040 |
|
|
2,780,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,987,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Castle Place Project, Series A, 7.00%, |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
1,270,262 |
|
Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare, 5.25%, 8/15/34 |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
2,303,805 |
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
178,980 |
|
7.63%, 9/15/39 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
363,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,116,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Sweetwater Wyoming, Refunding RB, FMC Corp. |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,401,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 94.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
173,311,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, |
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
$ |
3,075,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB, Miami International |
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
6,113,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 3.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (NPFGC), 5.38%, |
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
5,753,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal
Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
14,942,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
188,254,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.25% (i)(j) |
|
|
648,958 |
|
|
648,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
648,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $191,685,224*) 102.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
188,903,320 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
2,009,210 |
|
Liability for Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense and Fees Payable (4.0)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(7,290,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
183,622,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of April 30, 2010, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
183,704,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
9,676,376 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(11,762,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
$ |
(2,086,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to qualified institutional investors. |
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(c) |
When-issued security. Net unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Counterparty |
|
Value |
Unrealized |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
BB&T Capital Markets |
|
$ |
208,289 |
|
$ |
313 |
|
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
624,625 |
|
$ |
4,625 |
|
Raymond C. Forbes |
|
$ |
1,805,505 |
|
$ |
31,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default of interest payments. |
|
|
(e) |
Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(f) |
Security represents a beneficial interest in a trust. The collateral deposited into the trust is federally tax-exempt revenue bonds issued by various state or local governments, or their respective agencies or authorities. The security is subject to remarketing prior to its stated maturity. |
|
|
(g) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock Apex Municipal Fund, Inc. (APX) |
|
|
(h) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a tender option bond trust in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
(i) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Affiliate |
|
Shares |
|
Net |
|
Shares |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
|
100,006 |
|
|
548,952 |
|
|
648,958 |
|
$ |
2,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments, which are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including,but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments) |
|
|
|
|
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the inputs used as of April 30, 2010 in determining the fair valuation of the Funds investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Investments in Securities |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
188,254,362 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
188,254,362 |
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
648,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
648,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
648,958 |
|
$ |
188,254,362 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
188,903,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
||
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 1/01/13 |
|
$ |
635 |
|
$ |
601,904 |
|
5.25%, 1/01/17 |
|
|
530 |
|
|
480,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,082,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, RB, |
|
|
395 |
|
|
389,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 6.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coconino County Pollution Control Corp. Arizona, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,001,380 |
|
Maricopa County IDA Arizona, RB, Arizona Charter |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
1,251,981 |
|
Phoenix IDA Arizona, Refunding RB, America West Airlines |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
3,753,744 |
|
Pima County IDA, RB, Arizona Charter Schools Project, |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
1,380,115 |
|
Pima County IDA, Refunding IDRB, Tucson Electric Power, |
|
|
670 |
|
|
681,779 |
|
Pima County IDA, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Charter Schools Project, Series O, 5.25%, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
398,950 |
|
Charter Schools II, Series A, 6.75%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
670 |
|
|
646,195 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
2,575,709 |
|
5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
1,640,487 |
|
Show Low Improvement District, Special Assessment |
|
|
745 |
|
|
745,477 |
|
University Medical Center Corp. Arizona, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
280 |
|
|
298,052 |
|
6.50%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
532,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,906,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 4.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
640 |
|
|
618,938 |
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Baptist Homes of the West, 6.25%, |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
1,281,331 |
|
Senior Living, Southern California, 7.00%, |
|
|
600 |
|
|
644,442 |
|
Senior Living, Southern California, 7.25%, |
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
2,234,029 |
|
City of Fontana California, Special Tax Bonds, Refunding, |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
1,261,432 |
|
State of California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
2,289,433 |
|
Various Purpose, 6.00%, 3/01/33 |
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
3,384,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,714,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elk Valley Public Improvement Corp., RB, Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 7.10%, 9/01/14 |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
1,424,532 |
|
Series A, 7.30%, 9/01/22 |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
2,048,533 |
|
Series B, 7.45%, 9/01/31 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
186,542 |
|
Plaza Metropolitan District No. 1 Colorado, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Improvement Fee, 8.00%, |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
2,853,192 |
|
Subordinate Public Improvement Fee, |
|
|
525 |
|
|
500,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,013,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut 2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut State Development Authority, RB, AFCO |
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
$ |
3,297,945 |
|
Harbor Point Infrastructure Improvement District, |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
2,450,893 |
|
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut, RB, Public |
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
2,098,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,846,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Methodist Home District of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.38%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
985 |
|
|
998,583 |
|
7.50%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
1,638,789 |
|
District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
1,035,208 |
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
2,126,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,799,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 9.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Region Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
945 |
|
|
886,278 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, Refunding RB, Miami |
|
|
705 |
|
|
713,100 |
|
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Florida, RB, Special |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,102,887 |
|
Harbor Bay Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
455 |
|
|
455,332 |
|
Hillsborough County IDA, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Gypsum Co., Series A, AMT, 7.13%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,742,020 |
|
National Gypsum Co., Series B, AMT, 7.13%, |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
1,341,355 |
|
Tampa General Hospital Project, 5.00%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
2,492,071 |
|
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission, RB, |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,005,212 |
|
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
867,077 |
|
Lee County IDA Florida, RB, Series A, Lee Charter |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
2,005,165 |
|
Main Street Community Development District, Special |
|
|
500 |
|
|
469,165 |
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, |
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
3,054,036 |
|
Santa Rosa Bay Bridge Authority, RB, 6.25%, 7/01/28 |
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
1,655,432 |
|
Sarasota County Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/27 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
781,293 |
|
5.50%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
795 |
|
|
704,879 |
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, Sarasota |
|
|
695 |
|
|
720,374 |
|
Sumter Landing Community Development District Florida, |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
1,863,064 |
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Special |
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
2,132,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,991,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Georgia 4.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, Princeton |
|
$ |
640 |
|
$ |
561,792 |
|
Clayton County Development Authority, RB, Delta Air |
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
2,122,972 |
|
County of Clayton Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, |
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
2,257,461 |
|
DeKalb County Hospital Authority Georgia, RB, DeKalb |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
2,625,735 |
|
Gainesville & Hall County Development Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.38%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
727,076 |
|
6.63%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
244,160 |
|
Rockdale County Development Authority, RB, Visy Paper |
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
2,245,606 |
|
Thomasville Hospital Authority, RB, Anticipation |
|
|
300 |
|
|
297,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,082,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam Government Waterworks Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/01/25 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
766,267 |
|
5.88%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,128,115 |
|
Territory of Guam, GO, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 11/15/19 |
|
|
365 |
|
|
377,852 |
|
6.75%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
635 |
|
|
675,361 |
|
7.00%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
660 |
|
|
704,774 |
|
Territory of Guam, RB, Section 30, Series A, 5.63%, |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
1,487,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,139,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB, American |
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
3,075,606 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clare at Water Tower Project, Series A, 6.13%, |
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
1,176,843 |
|
Roosevelt University Project, 6.50%, 4/01/44 |
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
2,590,314 |
|
Rush University Medical Center Obligation Group, |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
1,332,279 |
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friendship Village of Schaumburg, 7.25%, 2/15/45 |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
2,351,775 |
|
Primary Health Care Centers Program, 6.60%, |
|
|
685 |
|
|
609,465 |
|
Village of Lincolnshire Illinois, Special Tax Bonds, |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
864,196 |
|
Village of Wheeling Illinois, Tax Allocation Bonds, North |
|
|
825 |
|
|
752,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,753,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Improvement, |
|
|
900 |
|
|
906,714 |
|
Vigo County Hospital Authority Indiana, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70%, 9/01/37 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
534,164 |
|
5.75%, 9/01/42 |
|
|
765 |
|
|
655,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Kentucky 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 6.38%, 6/01/40 |
|
$ |
935 |
|
$ |
961,180 |
|
Series B, 6.38%, 3/01/40 |
|
|
885 |
|
|
909,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,084,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland EDC, RB, Transportation Facilities Project, |
|
|
615 |
|
|
628,179 |
|
Maryland EDC, Refunding RB, Health & Mental Hygiene |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
1,495,570 |
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
590 |
|
|
253,712 |
|
Maryland State Energy Financing Administration, RB, |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
1,080,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,457,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Refunding |
|
|
500 |
|
|
402,565 |
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,126,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,529,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Technology Academy, RB, 6.00%, 11/01/37 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
803,808 |
|
County of Wayne Michigan, GO, Building Improvement, |
|
|
545 |
|
|
574,839 |
|
Monroe County Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
1,433,395 |
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority Michigan, Refunding |
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
4,408,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,220,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis Minnesota, Refunding RB, Fairview |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
1,992,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas City IDA Missouri, RB, First Mortgage, Bishop |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
887,200 |
|
Kirkwood IDA Missouri, RB, Aberdeen Heights, Series A, |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
1,363,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-State 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 7.50%, |
|
|
960 |
|
|
890,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Clark Nevada, Special Assessment Bonds, |
|
|
610 |
|
|
576,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority, |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
990,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
||
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Continental Airlines Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 9/15/19 |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
$ |
1,921,780 |
|
6.40%, 9/15/23 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
959,630 |
|
6.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
3,123,873 |
|
9.00%, 6/01/33 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,315,862 |
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding RB, Newark Airport Marriott |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,503,200 |
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
2,874,728 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
20 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
2,471,503 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
739,784 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. New Jersey, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 6/01/23 |
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
2,817,663 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/41 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
864,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,592,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 6.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., RB, Barclays |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,024,220 |
|
Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
2,526,425 |
|
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,391,418 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series 2008-C, |
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
4,279,354 |
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Airlines Inc., JFK International Airport, AMT, |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
1,088,754 |
|
British Airways Plc Project, AMT, 7.63%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,373,024 |
|
Series C, 6.80%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
510 |
|
|
536,219 |
|
Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series C-1, |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
1,358,546 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, National Sports |
|
|
870 |
|
|
9 |
|
Yonkers Industrial Development Agency New York, RB, |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
1,292,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,870,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
2,317,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 6/01/24 |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
2,084,276 |
|
6.50%, 6/01/47 |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
3,229,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,313,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pennsylvania 9.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, |
|
$ |
3,960 |
|
$ |
3,178,019 |
|
Bucks County IDA, RB, Anns Choice Inc. Facility, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.13%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
189,342 |
|
6.25%, 1/01/35 |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
1,410,794 |
|
Cumberland County Municipal Authority, RB, Diakon |
|
|
3,655 |
|
|
3,682,376 |
|
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, RB, Brethren Village |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 7/01/26 |
|
|
685 |
|
|
684,233 |
|
6.50%, 7/01/40 |
|
|
590 |
|
|
572,501 |
|
Montgomery County IDA Pennsylvania, MRB, Whitemarsh |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
1,870,524 |
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Gypsum Co., Series A, 6.25%, 11/01/27 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
2,594,572 |
|
Reliant Energy, Series B, 6.75%, 12/01/36 |
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
2,104,770 |
|
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
1,586,899 |
|
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Development, 7.75%, 12/01/17 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,005,450 |
|
Subordinate, Air Cargo, Series A, 7.50%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
2,163,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,042,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
1,684,815 |
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
1,864,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,548,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Falls Detention Facility Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
2,140,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connector 2000 Association Inc., RB, CAB, Senior |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
245,025 |
|
South Carolina Jobs, EDA, Refunding RB, Palmetto |
|
|
975 |
|
|
967,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,212,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knox County Health Educational & Housing Facilities |
|
|
6,480 |
|
|
1,263,794 |
|
Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities |
|
|
355 |
|
|
302,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,566,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 8.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bexar County Health Facilities Development Corp., RB, |
|
$ |
2,985 |
|
$ |
3,013,805 |
|
Brazos River Authority, Refunding RB, Texas Utility Co., |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
1,518,525 |
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, 7.56%, 1/01/29 (a) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
525,380 |
|
CAB, 7.65%, 1/01/30 (a) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
283,409 |
|
CAB, 7.71%, 1/01/31 (a) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
447,180 |
|
CAB, 7.77%, 1/01/32 (a) |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
723,310 |
|
CAB, 7.78%, 1/01/33 (a) |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
293,986 |
|
Senior Lien, 5.75%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
650 |
|
|
656,663 |
|
City of Houston Texas, RB, Special Facilities, Continental |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
2,675,737 |
|
Harris County Health Facilities Development Corp., |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,686,780 |
|
La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp., RB, KIPP Inc., |
|
|
860 |
|
|
887,253 |
|
Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1 Texas, |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
1,342,325 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, RB, Toll, 2nd Tier, Series F, |
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
2,959,648 |
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Young Memorial Home, 8.00%, 2/15/38 |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
1,023,656 |
|
Senior Living Center Project, 8.25%, 11/15/44 |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
2,464,577 |
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
2,434,198 |
|
Texas State Public Finance Authority, Refunding ERB, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
919,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,855,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Virgin Islands 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Virgin Islands, Refunding RB, Senior |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,039,120 |
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, RB, Senior Lien, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
473,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,512,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Carbon Utah, Refunding RB, Laidlaw |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
1,663,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dulles Town Center Community Development Authority, |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
1,335,340 |
|
Fairfax County EDA, Refunding RB, Goodwin House Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 10/01/37 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
724,792 |
|
5.13%, 10/01/42 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
430,475 |
|
Lexington IDA, Refunding MRB, Kendal at Lexington, |
|
|
540 |
|
|
453,298 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Virginia, |
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
4,043,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,987,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Wisconsin 2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Castle Place Project, Series A, 7.00%, |
|
$ |
1,855 |
|
$ |
1,785,104 |
|
Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare, 5.25%, 8/15/34 |
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
3,351,402 |
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
255,685 |
|
7.63%, 9/15/39 |
|
|
505 |
|
|
523,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,916,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Sweetwater Wyoming, Refunding RB, FMC Corp. |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
3,458,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 94.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
251,680,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, |
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
4,450,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB, Miami International |
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
8,845,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (NPFGC), 5.38%, |
|
|
8,690 |
|
|
8,756,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
22,052,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
273,732,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.25% (i)(j) |
|
|
149,925 |
|
|
149,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
149,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $278,498,455*) 102.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
273,882,637 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
3,711,696 |
|
Liability
for Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(10,763,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,831,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of April 30, 2010, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
267,163,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
12,828,567 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(16,865,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
$ |
(4,037,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(b) |
When-issued security. Net unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Raymond C. Forbes |
|
$ |
2,625,735 |
|
$ |
45,412 |
|
|
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
906,714 |
|
$ |
6,714 |
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets |
|
$ |
297,555 |
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default of interest payments. |
|
|
(d) |
Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(e) |
Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to qualified institutional investors. |
|
|
(f) |
Security represents a beneficial interest in a trust. The collateral deposited into the trust is federally tax-exempt revenue bonds issued by various state or local governments, or their respective agencies or authorities. The security is subject to remarketing prior to its stated maturity. |
|
|
(g) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date. |
|
|
(h) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a tender option bond trust in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
(i) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares |
|
Net |
|
Shares |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
2,001,534 |
|
(1,851,609) |
|
149,925 |
|
$ |
4,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments, which are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the inputs used as of April 30, 2010 in determining the fair valuation of the Funds investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in Securities |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,732,712 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,732,712 |
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
149,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
149,925 |
|
$ |
273,732,712 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,882,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2010 |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/22 |
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
$ |
2,368,218 |
|
4.75%, 1/01/25 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
1,739,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,107,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borough of Matanuska-Susitna Alaska, RB, Goose Creek |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,379,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Arizona, COP, Department of Administration, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/27 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
3,330,860 |
|
5.25%, 10/01/28 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,037,580 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/29 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
405,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,773,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 23.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.64%, 10/01/24 |
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
8,227,443 |
|
5.57%, 10/01/25 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
4,810,980 |
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,697,300 |
|
Antelope Valley Community College District, GO, |
|
|
600 |
|
|
617,436 |
|
Arcadia Unified School District California, GO, CAB, |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
262,224 |
|
Cabrillo Community College District California, GO, CAB, |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
419,208 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
550 |
|
|
571,797 |
|
California State University, RB, Systemwide, Series A |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,609,296 |
|
Chino Valley Unified School District, GO, Election of 2002, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
864,348 |
|
City of Redding California, COP, Refunding, Series A |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
1,448,329 |
|
Fresno Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
900 |
|
|
918,324 |
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, RB, Series C |
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
5,316,090 |
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/29 |
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
3,057,834 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
1,690,367 |
|
Norco Redevelopment Agency California, Tax Allocation |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,740,250 |
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(NPFGC), 5.00%, 2/01/33 |
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
7,579,648 |
|
Series B (AGM), 5.00%, 2/01/30 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,576,125 |
|
Series B (AGM), 5.00%, 2/01/31 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
943,515 |
|
Poway Redevelopment Agency California, Tax Allocation |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,573,810 |
|
Sacramento Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
4,221,504 |
|
San Mateo County Community College District, GO, CAB, |
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
4,072,214 |
|
State of California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 6/01/27 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
20,067 |
|
5.13%, 6/01/31 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
60,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockton Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
$ |
6,145 |
|
$ |
6,159,932 |
|
Ventura County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
2,381,963 |
|
West Basin Municipal Water District California, COP, |
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
5,140,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,980,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Covenant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/27 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,104,720 |
|
5.50%, 12/01/33 |
|
|
675 |
|
|
605,286 |
|
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
375 |
|
|
398,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,108,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Series B-1 (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
9,400 |
|
|
8,810,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 12.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward County School Board Florida, COP, Series A |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,651,344 |
|
City of Tallahassee Florida, RB (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,079,320 |
|
Collier County School Board, COP (AGM), 5.00%, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,095,280 |
|
County of Broward Florida, RB, Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
886,967 |
|
County of Duval Florida, COP, Master Lease Program |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,008,760 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, GO, Building Better |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,510,488 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB, Water & Sewer |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
5,071,027 |
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, Refunding RB, Miami |
|
|
9,900 |
|
|
9,424,602 |
|
County of Orange Florida, Refunding RB, Series B |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
4,240,866 |
|
Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Florida, RB, |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,762,285 |
|
Miami-Dade County School Board, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 5/01/31 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,859,328 |
|
5.00%, 5/01/33 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,997,280 |
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, Sarasota |
|
|
275 |
|
|
285,040 |
|
South Florida Water Management District, COP (AGC), |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,136,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,008,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augusta-Richmond County Georgia, RB (AGM), 5.25%, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,391,701 |
|
Gwinnett County Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
825 |
|
|
838,596 |
|
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Refunding RB, |
|
|
7,475 |
|
|
9,437,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,667,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
||
ANNUAL REPORT |
APRIL 30, 2010 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Illinois 19.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education Illinois, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGM), 5.50%, 12/01/31 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
$ |
3,344,940 |
|
Chicago School Reform Board (NPFGC), 5.50%, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,120,870 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, ARB, General, 3rd Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGM), 5.75%, 1/01/23 |
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
5,887,445 |
|
(Syncora), 6.00%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,599,650 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
500 |
|
|
529,010 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, RB, Series A (AGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,042,000 |
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB, General Airport, |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
9,241,110 |
|
County of Cook Illinois, GO, Capital Improvement, |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
2,741,399 |
|
Illinois Municipal Electric Agency, RB, Series A (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,020,410 |
|
Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, RB, State Tax |
|
|
20,120 |
|
|
20,327,437 |
|
Regional Transportation Authority, RB, Series A |
|
|
10,115 |
|
|
12,394,213 |
|
State of Illinois, RB, Build Illinois, Series B, 5.25%, |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
1,328,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,576,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, RB, Indiana Municipal |
|
|
400 |
|
|
422,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, RB, Series A (AGC), 5.63%, |
|
|
5,725 |
|
|
6,110,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,404,813 |
|
Louisiana State Transportation Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
432,242 |
|
Rapides Finance Authority Louisiana, RB, Cleco |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
1,947,015 |
|
State of Louisiana, RB, Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
1,761,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,545,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
1,273,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts HFA, RB, AMT (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Mortgage, Series F, 5.25%, 1/01/46 |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
5,291,096 |
|
S/F Housing, Series 128, 4.80%, 12/01/27 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,564,624 |
|
Massachusetts HFA, Refunding RB, Rental Housing, |
|