Futures Contract		Position Accountability Levels and Limits		Maximum Daily Price Fluctuation
NYMEX Natural Gas (physically settled)		Any one month: 6,000 net futures / all months: 12,000 net futures, but not to exceed 1,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month		$3.00 per mmBtu ($30,000 per contract) for all months. If any contract is traded, bid, or offered at the limit for five minutes, trading is halted for five minutes. When trading resumes, the limit is expanded by $3.00 per mmBtu in either direction. If another halt were triggered, the market would continue to be expanded by $3.00 per mmBtu in either direction after each successive five-minute trading halt. There will be no maximum price fluctuation limits during any one trading session.
ICE Natural Gas (cleared swaps)		Any one month: 6,000 net futures / all months: 12,000 net futures, but not to exceed 1,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month		There is no maximum daily price fluctuation limit
NYMEX Light, Sweet Crude Oil (physically settled)		Any one month: 10,000 net futures / all months: 20,000 net futures, but not to exceed 3,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month.		$10.00 per barrel ($10,000 per contract) for all months. If any contract is traded, bid, or offered at the limit for five minutes, trading is halted for five minutes. When trading resumes, the limit is expanded by $10.00 per barrel in either direction. If another halt were triggered, the market would continue to be expanded by $10.00 per barrel in either direction after each successive five-minute trading halt. There will be no maximum price fluctuation limits during any one trading session.
NYMEX Light, Sweet Crude Oil (financially settled)		Any one month: 20,000 net futures / all months: 20,000 net futures, but not to exceed 2,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month.		There is no maximum daily price fluctuation limit.
ICE West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) Crude Futures (financially settled)		Any one month: 10,000 net futures / all months: 20,000 net futures, but not to exceed 3,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month.		There is no maximum daily price fluctuation limit.
ICE Brent Crude Futures (physically settled)		There are no position limits.		There is no maximum daily price fluctuation limit.

 

10

---

 

NYMEX Heating Oil (physically settled)		Any one month: 5,000 net futures / all months: 7,000 net futures, but not to exceed 1,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month		$0.25 per gallon ($10,500 per contract) for all months. If any contract is traded, bid, or offered at the limit for five minutes, trading is halted for five minutes. When trading resumes, the limit is expanded by $0.25 per gallon in either direction. If another halt were triggered, the market would continue to be expanded by $0.25 per gallon in either direction after each successive five-minute trading halt. There will be no maximum price fluctuation limits during any one trading session.
NYMEX Gasoline (physically settled)		Any one month: 5,000 net futures / all months: 7,000 net futures, but not to exceed 1,000 contracts in the last three days of trading in the spot month.		$0.25 per gallon ($10,500 per contract) for all months. If any contract is traded, bid, or offered at the limit for five minutes, trading is halted for five minutes. When trading resumes, the limit is expanded by $0.25 per gallon in either direction. If another halt were triggered, the market would continue to be expanded by $0.25 per gallon in either direction after each successive five-minute trading halt. There will be no maximum price fluctuation limits during any one trading session.

 

Price Volatility. Despite daily price limits, the price volatility of Futures Contracts generally has been historically greater than that for traditional securities such as stocks and bonds. Price volatility often is greater day-to-day as opposed to intra-day. Futures Contracts tend to be more volatile than stocks and bonds because price movements for natural gas are more currently and directly influenced by economic factors for which current data is available and are traded by natural gas futures traders throughout the day. These economic factors include changes in interest rates; governmental, agricultural, trade, fiscal, monetary and exchange control programs and policies; weather and climate conditions; changing supply and demand relationships; changes in balances of payments and trade; U.S. and international rates of inflation; currency devaluations and revaluations; U.S. and international political and economic events; and changes in philosophies and emotions of market participants. Because US12NG invests a significant portion of its assets in Futures Contracts, the assets of US12NG, and therefore the prices of US12NG units, may be subject to greater volatility than traditional securities.

Marking-to-Market Futures Positions. Futures Contracts are marked to market at the end of each trading day and the margin required with respect to such contracts is adjusted accordingly. This process of marking-to-market is designed to prevent losses from accumulating in any futures account. Therefore, if US12NG’s futures positions have declined in value, US12NG may be required to post additional variation margin to cover this decline. Alternatively, if US12NG futures positions have increased in value, this increase will be credited to US12NG’s account.

 

What is the Natural Gas Market and the Petroleum-Based Fuel Market?

Natural Gas.  Natural gas accounts for almost a quarter of U.S. energy consumption. The price of natural gas is established by the supply and demand conditions in the North American market, and more particularly, in the main refining center of the U.S. Gulf Coast. The natural gas market essentially constitutes an auction, where the highest bidder wins the supply. When markets are “strong” (i.e., when demand is high and/or supply is low), the bidder must be willing to pay a higher premium to capture the supply. When markets are “weak” (i.e., when demand is low and/or supply is high), a bidder may choose not to outbid competitors, waiting instead for later, possibly lower priced, supplies. Demand for natural gas by consumers, as well as agricultural, manufacturing and transportation industries, determines overall demand for natural gas. Since the precursors of product demand are linked to economic activity, natural gas demand will tend to reflect economic conditions. However, other factors such as weather significantly influence natural gas demand.

 

11

---

 

Leverage

 

While US12NG’s historical ratio of initial margin to total assets has generally ranged from 5% to 10%, the General Partner endeavors to have the value of US12NG’s Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents, whether held by US12NG or posted as margin or collateral, at all times approximate the aggregate market value of its obligations under US12NG’s Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments. While the General Partner does not intend to leverage US12NG’s assets, it is not prohibited from doing so under the LP Agreement.

 

Borrowings

Borrowings are not used by US12NG, unless US12NG is required to borrow money in the event of physical delivery, US12NG trades in cash commodities, or for short-term needs created by unexpected redemptions. US12NG maintains the value of its Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents whether held by US12NG or posted as margin or collateral, to at all times approximate the aggregate market value of its obligations under its Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments. US12NG has not established and does not plan to establish credit lines.

 

Over-the-Counter Derivatives (Including Spreads and Straddles)

 

In addition to Futures Contracts, there are also a number of listed options on the Futures Contracts on the principal futures exchanges. These contracts offer investors and hedgers another set of financial vehicles to use in managing exposure to the natural gas market. Consequently, US12NG may purchase options on natural gas Futures Contracts on these exchanges in pursuing its investment objective.

In addition to the Futures Contracts and options on the Futures Contracts, there also exists an active non-exchange-traded market in derivatives tied to natural gas. These derivatives transactions (also known as over-the-counter contracts) are usually entered into between two parties. Unlike most of the exchange-traded Futures Contracts or exchange-traded options on the Futures Contracts, each party to such contract bears the credit risk that the other party may not be able to perform its obligations under its contract.

Some natural gas-based derivatives transactions contain fairly generic terms and conditions and are available from a wide range of participants. Other natural gas-based derivatives have highly customized terms and conditions and are not as widely available. Many of these over-the-counter contracts are cash-settled forwards for the future delivery of natural gas- or petroleum-based fuels that have terms similar to the Futures Contracts. Others take the form of “swaps” in which the two parties exchange cash flows based on pre-determined formulas tied to the natural gas spot price, forward natural gas price, the Benchmark Futures Contract price, or other natural gas futures contract price. For example, US12NG may enter into over-the-counter derivative contracts whose value will be tied to changes in the difference between the natural gas spot price, the Benchmark Futures Contract price, or some other futures contract price traded on the NYMEX or ICE Futures and the price of other Futures Contracts that may be invested in by US12NG.

To protect itself from the credit risk that arises in connection with such contracts, US12NG may enter into agreements with each counterparty that provide for the netting of its overall exposure to its counterparty, such as the agreements published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. US12NG also may require that the counterparty be highly rated and/or provide collateral or other credit support to address US12NG’s exposure to the counterparty.

The General Partner assesses or reviews, as appropriate, the creditworthiness of each potential or existing counterparty to an over-the-counter contract pursuant to guidelines approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors. Furthermore, the General Partner, on behalf of US12NG, only enters into over-the-counter contracts with counterparties who are, or affiliates of, (a) banks regulated by a United States federal bank regulator, (b) broker-dealers regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), (c) insurance companies domiciled in the United States, or (d) producers, users or traders of energy, whether or not regulated by the CFTC. Any entity acting as a counterparty shall be regulated in either the United States or the United Kingdom unless otherwise approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors after consultation with its legal counsel. Existing counterparties are also reviewed periodically by the General Partner.

 

15

---

 

US12NG may employ spreads or straddles in its trading to mitigate the differences in its investment portfolio and its goal of tracking the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract. US12NG would use a spread when it chooses to take simultaneous long and short positions in futures written on the same underlying asset, but with different delivery months. The effect of holding such combined positions is to adjust the sensitivity of US12NG to changes in the price relationship between futures contracts which will expire sooner and those that will expire later. US12NG would use such a spread if the General Partner felt that taking such long and short positions, when combined with the rest of its holdings, would more closely track the investment goals of US12NG, or if the General Partner felt it would lead to an overall lower cost of trading to achieve a given level of economic exposure to movements in natural gas prices. US12NG would enter into a straddle when it chooses to take an option position consisting of a long (or short) position in both a call option and put option. The economic effect of holding certain combinations of put options and call options can be very similar to that of owning the underlying futures contracts. US12NG would make use of such a straddle approach if, in the opinion of the General Partner, the resulting combination would more closely track the investment goals of US12NG or if it would lead to an overall lower cost of trading to achieve a given level of economic exposure to movements in natural gas prices.

US12NG has not employed any hedging methods since all of its investments have been made over an exchange. Therefore, US12NG has not been exposed to counterparty risk.

 

20

---

 

DTC has advised US12NG that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a unitholder (including, without limitation, the presentation of a global certificate for exchange) only at the direction of one or more DTC Participants in whose account with DTC interests in global certificates are credited and only in respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of the global certificate as to which such DTC Participant or Participants has or have given such direction.

 

Transfer/Application Requirements. All purchasers of US12NG’s units, and potentially any purchasers of units in the future, who wish to become limited partners or other record holders and receive cash distributions, if any, or have certain other rights, must deliver an executed transfer application in which the purchaser or transferee must certify that, among other things, he, she or it agrees to be bound by US12NG’s LP Agreement and is eligible to purchase US12NG’s securities. Each purchaser of units must execute a transfer application and certification. The obligation to provide the form of transfer application is imposed on the seller of units or, if a purchase of units is made through an exchange, the form may be obtained directly through US12NG. Further, the General Partner may request each record holder to furnish certain information, including that record holder’s nationality, citizenship or other related status. A record holder is a unitholder that is, or has applied to be, a limited partner. An investor who is not a U.S. resident may not be eligible to become a record holder or one of US12NG’s limited partners if that investor’s ownership would subject US12NG to the risk of cancellation or forfeiture of any of US12NG’s assets under any federal, state or local law or regulation. If the record holder fails to furnish the information or if the General Partner determines, on the basis of the information furnished by the holder in response to the request, that such holder is not qualified to become one of US12NG’s limited partners, the General Partner may be substituted as a holder for the record holder, who will then be treated as a non-citizen assignee, and US12NG will have the right to redeem those securities held by the record holder.

 

A transferee’s broker, agent or nominee may complete, execute and deliver a transfer application and certification. US12NG may, at its discretion, treat the nominee holder of a unit as the absolute owner. In that case, the beneficial holder’s rights are limited solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.

 

A person purchasing US12NG’s existing units, who does not execute a transfer application and certify that the purchaser is eligible to purchase those securities acquires no rights in those securities other than the right to resell those securities. Whether or not a transfer application is received or the consent of the General Partner obtained, US12NG’s units are securities and are transferable according to the laws governing transfers of securities.

Any transfer of units will not be recorded by the transfer agent or recognized by the General Partner unless a completed transfer application is delivered to the General Partner or the Administrator. When acquiring units, the transferee of such units that completes a transfer application will:

·

be an assignee until admitted as a substituted limited partner upon the consent and sole discretion of the General Partner and the recording of the assignment on the books and records of the partnership;

·

automatically request admission as a substituted limited partner;

·

agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and execute, US12NG’s LP Agreement;

·

represent that such transferee has the capacity and authority to enter into US12NG’s LP Agreement;

·

grant powers of attorney to US12NG’s General Partner and any liquidator of US12NG; and

·

make the consents and waivers contained in US12NG’s LP Agreement.

An assignee will become a limited partner in respect of the transferred units upon the consent of US12NG’s General Partner and the recordation of the name of the assignee on US12NG’s books and records. Such consent may be withheld in the sole discretion of US12NG’s General Partner.

 

21

---

 

 

Until a unit has been transferred on US12NG’s books, US12NG and the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise required by law or stock exchange regulations.

 

Withdrawal of Limited Partners

 

Calculating NAV

 

US12NG’s NAV is calculated by:

·

Taking the current market value of its total assets; and

·

Subtracting any liabilities.

 

Prior Performance of US12NG

 

US12NG’s units began trading on the NYSE Arca on November 18, 2009 and are offered on a continuous basis.  As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by US12NG from Authorized Purchasers was $40,652,357; the total number of Authorized Purchasers was 2; the number of baskets purchased by Authorized Purchasers was 8; the number of baskets redeemed by Authorized Purchasers was 1; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 800,000. For more information on the performance of US12NG, see the Performance Tables below.

Since its initial offering of 30,000,000 units, US12NG not made any subsequent offerings of its units.  As of December 31, 2009, there were 29,200,000 units registered but not yet issued.

Since the offering of US12NG units to the public on November 18, 2009 to December 31, 2009, the simple average daily change in its benchmark futures contract was 0.291%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of US12NG over the same time period was 0.287%. The average daily difference was -0.004 % (or -0.4 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the Benchmark Futures Contract, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was 0.089%, meaning that over this time period US12NG’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

 

27

---

 

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	1,500,000,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	40,652,357
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	82,445
FINRA registration fee:		$	75,500
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	2,500
Legal fees and expenses:		$	202,252
Printing expenses:		$	31,588
Length of US12NG Offering:		Continuous

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	These expenses were paid for by the General Partner.

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation US12NG:

Expenses paid by US12NG through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	16,490
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	9,284
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	141,553
Total Expenses Paid:		$	167,327
Expenses Waived**:		$	(136,678	)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		$	30,649

*	Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

**	The General Partner, though under no obligation to do so, agreed to pay certain expenses, to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of US12NG’s NAV, on an annualized basis. The General Partner has no obligation to continue such payment into subsequent periods.

Expenses paid by US12NG through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage  of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.60% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.34% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		5.15% annualized
Total Expenses Paid:		6.09% annualized
Expenses Waived:		(4.97)% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		1.12% annualized

 

28

---

 

US12NG Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		US12NG
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		November 18, 2009
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	40,652,357
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	37,637,148
Initial NAV per Unit as of Inception:		$	50.00
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	53.77
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		November 2009 (0.02)%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		November 2009 (0.02)%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			1,276

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR US12NG

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2009
January			-
February			-
March			-
April			-
May			-
June			-
July			-
August			-
September			-
October			-
November			(0.02	)%**
December			7.56	%
Annual Rate of Return			7.54	%**

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**	Partial from November 18, 2009.

Terms Used in Performance Tables

Draw-down: Losses experienced over a specified period. Draw-down is measured on the basis of monthly returns only and does not reflect intra-month figures.

Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down: The largest single month loss sustained since inception of trading.

 

29

---

 

Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down: The largest percentage decline in the NAV per unit over the history of the fund. This need not be a continuous decline, but can be a series of positive and negative returns where the negative returns are larger than the positive returns.  Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down represents the greatest percentage decline from any month-end NAV per unit that occurs without such month-end NAV per unit being equaled or exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the NAV per unit declined by $1 in each of January and February, increased by $1 in March and declined again by $2 in April, a “peak-to-trough drawdown” analysis conducted as of the end of April would consider that “drawdown” to be still continuing and to be $3 in amount, whereas if the NAV per unit had increased by $2 in March, the January-February drawdown would have ended as of the end of February at the $2 level.

Prior Performance of the Related Public Funds

The General Partner is also currently the general partner of the Related Public Funds. Each of the General Partner and the Related Public Funds is located in California.

USOF is a commodity pool and issues units traded on the NYSE Arca. The investment objective of USOF is for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to reflect the changes in percentage terms of the price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the changes in the price of the futures contract on light, sweet crude oil traded on the NYMEX, less USOF’s expenses. USOF’s units began trading on April 10, 2006 and are offered on a continuous basis. USOF may invest in a mixture of listed crude oil futures contracts, other non-listed oil related investments, Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by USOF from its authorized purchasers was $24,257,292,570; the total number of authorized purchasers of USOF was 17; the number of baskets purchased by authorized purchasers of USOF was 4,752; the number of baskets redeemed by authorized purchasers of USOF was 4,121; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 475,200,000. USOF employs an investment strategy in its operations that is similar to the investment strategy of US12NG, except that its benchmark is the near month contract to expire for light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma.

Since the offering of USOF units to the public on April 10, 2006 to December 31, 2009, the simple average daily change in its benchmark oil futures contract was -0.027%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of USOF over the same time period was -0.022%. The average daily difference was 0.005% (or 0.5 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the benchmark oil futures contract, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was 1.56%, meaning that over this time period USOF’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

USNG is a commodity pool and issues units traded on the NYSE Arca. The investment objective of USNG is for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to reflect the changes in percentage terms of the spot price of natural gas delivered at the Henry Hub, Louisiana as measured by the changes in the price of the futures contract for natural gas traded on the NYMEX, less USNG’s expenses. USNG’s units began trading on April 18, 2007 and are offered on a continuous basis. USNG may invest in a mixture of listed natural gas futures contracts, other non-listed natural gas related investments, Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by USNG from its authorized purchasers was $10,435,093,775; the total number of authorized purchasers of USNG was 14; the number of baskets purchased by authorized purchasers of USNG was 5,821; the number of baskets redeemed by authorized purchasers of USNG was 1,326; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 582,100,000. USNG employs an investment strategy in its operations that is similar to the investment strategy of US12NG, except its benchmark is the near month contract for natural gas delivered at the Henry Hub, Louisiana.

Since the offering of USNG units to the public on April 18, 2007 to December 31, 2009, the simple average daily change in its benchmark futures contract was -0.181%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of USNG over the same time period was -0.179%. The average daily difference was 0.002% (or 0.2 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the benchmark futures contract, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was 0.392%, meaning that over this time period USNG’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

 

30

---

 

US12OF is a commodity pool and issues units traded on the NYSE Arca. The investment objective of US12OF is for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to reflect the changes in percentage terms of the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the changes in the average of the prices of 12 futures contracts on light, sweet crude oil traded on the NYMEX, consisting of the near month contract to expire and the contracts for the following 11 months, for a total of 12 consecutive months’ contracts, less US12OF’s expenses. US12OF’s units began trading on December 6, 2007 and are offered on a continuous basis. US12OF invests in a mixture of listed crude oil futures contracts, other non-listed oil related investments, Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by US12OF from its authorized purchasers was $224,069,815; the total number of authorized purchasers of US12OF was 4; the number of baskets purchased by authorized purchasers of US12OF was 75; the number of baskets redeemed by authorized purchasers of US12OF was 34; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 7,500,000. US12OF employs an investment strategy in its operations that is similar to the investment strategy of US12NG, except that its benchmark is the average of the prices of the near month contract to expire and the following eleven months contracts for light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma.

Since the offering of US12OF units to the public on December 6, 2007 to December 31, 2009, the simple average daily change in its benchmark futures contracts was -0.004%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of US12OF over the same time period was -0.003%. The average daily difference was 0.001% (or 0.1 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the benchmark futures contracts, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was -0.107%, meaning that over this time period US12OF’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

UGA is a commodity pool and issues units traded on the NYSE Arca. The investment objective of UGA is for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to reflect the changes in percentage terms in the spot price of unleaded gasoline for delivery to the New York harbor, as measured by the changes in the price of the futures contract on gasoline traded on the NYMEX, less UGA’s expenses. UGA may invest in a mixture of listed gasoline futures contracts, other non-listed gasoline related investments, Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. UGA’s units began trading on February 26, 2008 and are offered on a continuous basis. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by UGA from its authorized purchasers was $126,263,653; the total number of authorized purchasers of UGA was 6; the number of baskets purchased by authorized purchasers of UGA was 42; the number of baskets redeemed by authorized purchasers of UGA was 23; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 4,200,000. UGA employs an investment strategy in its operations that is similar to the investment strategy of US12NG, except that its benchmark is the near month contract for unleaded gasoline delivered to the New York harbor.

Since the offering of UGA units to the public on February 26, 2008 to December 31, 2009, the simple average daily change in its benchmark futures contract was -0.011%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of UGA over the same time period was -0.012%. The average daily difference was -0.001% (or -0.1 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the benchmark futures contract, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was -0.674%, meaning that over this time period UGA’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

USHO is a commodity pool and issues units traded on the NYSE Arca. The investment objective of USHO is for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to reflect the changes in percentage terms of the spot price of heating oil for delivery to the New York harbor, as measured by the changes in the price of the futures contract on heating oil traded on the NYMEX, less USHO’s expenses. USHO may invest in a mixture of listed heating oil futures contracts, other non-listed heating oil-related investments, Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. USHO’s units began trading on April 9, 2008 and are offered on a continuous basis. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by USHO from its authorized purchasers was $27,750,399; the total number of authorized purchasers of USHO was 6; the number of baskets purchased by authorized purchasers of USHO was 8; the number of baskets redeemed by authorized purchasers of USHO was 2; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 800,000. USHO employs an investment strategy in its operations that is similar to the investment strategy of US12NG, except that its benchmark is the near month contract for heating oil delivered to the New York harbor.

Since the offering of USHO units to the public on April 9, 2008 to December 31, 2009, the simple average daily change in its benchmark futures contract was -0.093%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of USHO over the same time period was -0.093%. The average daily difference was 0%. As a percentage of the daily movement of the benchmark futures contract, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was -0.696%, meaning that over this time period USHO’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

 

31

---

USSO is a commodity pool and issues units traded on the NYSE Arca. The investment objective of USSO is for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to inversely reflect the changes in percentage terms of the price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma as measured by the changes in the price of the futures contract for light, sweet crude oil traded on the NYMEX, less USSO’s expenses.  USSO’s units began trading on September 24, 2009 and are offered on a continuous basis. USSO invests in short positions in listed crude oil futures contracts, other non-listed oil related investments, Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of money raised by USSO from its authorized purchasers was $14,290,534; the total number of authorized purchasers of USSO was 7; the number of baskets purchased by authorized purchasers of USSO was 3; no baskets were redeemed by authorized purchasers of USSO; and the aggregate amount of units purchased was 300,000. USSO employs an investment strategy in its operations that is similar to the investment strategy of US12NG, except that its benchmark is the inverse of the near month contract for light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma.

Since the offering of USSO units to the public on September 24, 2009 to December 31, 2009, the inverse of the simple average daily change in its benchmark futures contract was -0.164%, while the simple average daily change in the NAV of USSO over the same time period was -0.167%. The average daily difference was -0.003% (or -0.3 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the inverse of the daily movement of the benchmark futures contract, the average error in daily tracking by the NAV was -0.179%, meaning that over this time period USSO’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

The General Partner has filed a registration statement for two other exchange traded security funds, USBO and USCI. The investment objective of USBO will be for the daily changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the spot price of Brent crude oil, as measured by the changes in the price of the futures contract on Brent crude oil traded on the ICE Futures, less USBO’s expenses. The investment objective of USCI will be for the changes in percentage terms of its units’ NAV to reflect the changes in percentage terms of the SDCI, less USCI’s expenses.

There are significant differences between investing in US12NG and the Related Public Funds and investing directly in the futures market. The General Partner’s results with US12NG and the Related Public Funds may not be representative of results that may be experienced with a fund directly investing in futures contracts or other managed funds investing in futures contracts. Moreover, given the different investment objectives of US12NG and the Related Public Funds, the performance of US12NG may not be representative of results that may be experienced by the other Related Public Funds. For more information on the performance of the Related Public Funds, see the Performance Tables below. 

USOF:

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	71,257,630,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	24,257,292,570
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	2,480,174
FINRA registration fee:		$	603,500
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	495,850
Legal fees and expenses:		$	2,040,875
Printing expenses:		$	285,230
Length of USOF Offering:		Continuous

  

---

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	Through December 31, 2006, these expenses were paid for by an affiliate of the General Partner in connection with the initial public offering. Following December 31, 2006, USOF has recorded these expenses.

  

 

32

---

 

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation USOF:

Expenses Paid by USOF through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	20,842,027
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	7,159,498
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	8,770,873
Total Expenses Paid:		$	36,772,398

*	Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional units, legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

Expenses Paid by USOF through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.46% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.16% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		0.19% annualized
Total Expenses Paid:		0.81% annualized

 

USOF Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		USOF
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		April 10, 2006
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	24,257,292,570
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	2,471,252,817
Initial NAV Per Unit as of Inception:		$	67.39
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	39.16
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		October 2008 (31.57)		%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		June 2008 – February 2009 (75.84)		%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			84,835

 

 

33

---

 

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR USOF

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2006				2007				2008				2009
January			–				(6.55	)%			(4.00	)%			(14.60	)%
February			–				5.63	%			11.03	%			(6.55	)%
March			–				4.61	%			0.63	%			7.23	%
April			3.47	%**			(4.26	)%			12.38	%			(2.38	)%
May			(2.91	)%			(4.91	)%			12.80	%			26.69	%
June			3.16	%			9.06	%			9.90	%			4.16	%
July			(0.50	)%			10.57	%			(11.72	)%			(2.30	)%
August			(6.97	)%			(4.95	)%			(6.75	)%			(1.98	)%
September			(11.72	)%			12.11	%			(12.97	)%			0.25	%
October			(8.45	)%			16.98	%			(31.57	)%			8.43	%
November			4.73	%			(4.82	)%			(20.65	)%			(0.51	)%
December			(5.21	)%			8.67	%			(22.16	)%			(0.03	)%
Annual Rate of Return			(23.03	)%**			46.17	%			(54.75	)%			14.14	%

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**	Partial from April 10, 2006.

For a definition of draw-down, please see text below “Composite Performance Data for US12NG.”

USNG:

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	24,056,500,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	10,435,093,775
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	1,361,084
FINRA registration fee:		$	377,500
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	274,350
Legal fees and expenses:		$	1,614,956
Printing expenses:		$	73,270
Length of USNG Offering:		Continuous

 

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	Through April 18, 2007, these expenses were paid for by the General Partner. Following April 18, 2007, USNG has recorded these expenses.

 

34

---

 

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation USNG:

Expenses paid by USNG through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	19,802,761
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	12,603,078
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	8,074,997
Total Expenses Paid:		$	40,480,836

*	Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional units, legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

Expenses paid by USNG through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.55% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.35% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		0.23% annualized
Total Expenses Paid:		1.13% annualized

USNG Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		USNG
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		April 18, 2007
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	10,435,093,775
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	4,525,107,163
Initial NAV per Unit as of Inception:		$	50.00
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	10.07
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		July 2008 (32.13)		%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		June 2008 – November 2009 (85.89)		%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			203,277

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR USNG

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2007				2008				2009
January			–				8.87	%			(21.49	)%
February			–				15.87	%			(5.47	)%
March			–				6.90	%			(11.81	)%
April			4.30	%**			6.42	%			(13.92	)%
May			(0.84	)%			6.53	%			10.37	%
June			(15.90	)%			13.29	%			(4.63	)%
July			(9.68	)%			(32.13	)%			(8.70	)%
August			(13.37	)%			(13.92	)%			(27.14	)%
September			12.28	%			(9.67	)%			26.03	%
October			12.09	%			(12.34	)%			(13.31	)%
November			(16.16	)%			(6.31	)%			(11.86	)%
December			0.75	%			(14.32	)%			13.91	%
Annual Rate of Return			(27.64	)%**			(35.68	)%			(56.73	)%

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**	Partial from April 18, 2007.

 

For a definition of draw-down, please see text below “Composite Performance Data for US12NG.”

 

 

35

---

 

 

US12OF:

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	3,718,000,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	224,069,815
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	129,248
FINRA registration fee:		$	151,000
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	60,700
Legal fees and expenses:		$	301,279
Printing expenses:		$	44,402
Length of US12OF Offering:		Continuous

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	Through March 31, 2009, a portion of these expenses were paid for by an affiliate of the General Partner in connection with the initial public offering. Following March 31, 2009, US12OF has recorded these expenses.

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation US12OF:

Expenses paid by US12OF through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	922,534
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	52,790
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	798,777
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:		$	1,774,101
Expenses Waived**:		$	(108,246	)
Net Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		$	1,665,855

*	Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional units, legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

**

The General Partner, though under no obligation to do so, agreed to pay certain expenses, to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of US12OF’s NAV, on an annualized basis through March 31, 2009, after which date such payments were no longer necessary. The General Partner has no obligation to pay such expenses in subsequent periods.

 

 

36

---

 

Expenses paid by US12OF through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.60% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.03% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		0.52% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:		1.15% annualized
Expenses Waived:		(0.07)% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		1.08% annualized

US12OF Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		US12OF
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		December 6, 2007
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	224,069,815
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	165,523,309
Initial NAV per Unit as of Inception:		$	50.00
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	40.37
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		October 2008 (29.59)		%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		June 2008 –February 2009 (66.97)		%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			6,875

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR US12OF

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2007				2008				2009
January			–				(2.03	)%			(7.11	)%
February			–				10.48	%			(4.34	)%
March			–				(0.66	)%			9.22	%
April			–				11.87	%			(1.06	)%
May			–				15.47	%			20.40	%
June			–				11.59	%			4.51	%
July			–				(11.39	)%			1.22	%
August			–				(6.35	)%			(2.85	)%
September			–				(13.12	)%			(0.92	)%
October			–				(29.59	)%			8.48	%
November			–				(16.17	)%			2.31	%
December			8.46	%**			(12.66	)%			(1.10	)%
Annual Rate of Return			8.46	%**			(42.39	)%			29.23	%

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**	Partial from December 6, 2007.

For a definition of draw-down, please see text below “Composite Performance Data for US12NG.”

 

37

---

 

UGA:

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	1,500,000,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	126,263,653
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	184,224
FINRA registration fee:		$	151,000
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	27,500
Legal fees and expenses:		$	217,078
Printing expenses:		$	162,901
Length of UGA Offering:		Continuous

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	Through August 31, 2009, initial offering costs and a portion of ongoing expenses were paid for by the General Partner. Following August 31, 2009, UGA has paid the full portion of expenses related to registration of new units and a portion of the expenses related to regular operations.

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation UGA:

Expenses paid by UGA through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	474,543
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	90,757
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	529,839
Total Expenses Paid:		$	1,095,139
Expenses Waived**:		$	(382,703	)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		$	712,436

*	Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional units, legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

**	The General Partner, though under no obligation to do so, agreed to pay certain expenses, to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of UGA’s NAV, on an annualized basis. The General Partner has no obligation to continue such payment into subsequent periods.

Expenses paid by UGA through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.60% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.11% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		0.67% annualized
Total Expenses Paid:		1.38% annualized
Expenses Waived:		(0.48)% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		0.90% annualized

 

 

38

---

 

UGA Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		UGA
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		February 26, 2008
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	126,263,653
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	69,185,740
Initial NAV per Unit as of Inception:		$	50.00
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	36.41
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		October 2008 (38.48)		%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		June 2008 – December 2008 (69.02)		%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			5,131

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR UGA

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2008				2009
January			–				16.23	%
February			(0.56	)%**			0.26	%
March			(2.39	)%			2.59	%
April			10.94	%			2.07	%
May			15.60	%			30.41	%
June			4.80	%			1.65	%
July			(12.79	)%			6.24	%
August			(3.88	)%			(3.71	)%
September			(9.36	)%			(3.38	)%
October			(38.48	)%			10.96	%
November			(21.35	)%			1.00	%
December			(15.72	)%			0.55	%
Annual Rate of Return			(59.58	)%**			80.16	%

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**	Partial from February 26, 2008.

For a definition of draw-down, please see text below “Composite Performance Data for US12NG.”

 

39

---

 

USHO:

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	500,000,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	27,750,399
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	142,234
FINRA registration fee:		$	151,000
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	27,500
Legal fees and expenses:		$	121,321
Printing expenses:		$	106,584
Length of USHO Offering:		Continuous

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	Through August 31, 2009, initial offering costs and a portion of ongoing expenses were paid for by the General Partner. Following August 31, 2009, USHO has paid the full portion of expenses related to registration of new units and a portion of the expenses related to regular operations.

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation USHO:

Expenses paid by USHO through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	109,681
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	18,418
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	333,904
Total Expenses Paid:		$	462,003
Expenses Waived**:		$	(299,225	)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		$	162,778

*	Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional units, legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

**	The General Partner, though under no obligation to do so, agreed to pay certain expenses, to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USHO’s NAV, on an annualized basis. The General Partner has no obligation to continue such payment into subsequent periods.

Expenses paid by USHO through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.60% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.10% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		1.83% annualized
Total Expenses Paid:		2.53% annualized
Expenses Waived:		(1.64)% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		0.89% annualized

 

 

40

---

 

USHO Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		USHO
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		April 9, 2008
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	27,750,399
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	16,525,095
Initial NAV per Unit as of Inception:		$	50.00
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	27.54
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		October 2008 (28.63)		%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		June 2008 – February 2009 (69.17)		%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			1,154

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR USHO

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2008				2009
January			–				0.05	%
February			–				(11.34	)%
March			–				6.73	%
April			2.84	%**			(3.85	)%
May			15.93	%			23.13	%
June			5.91	%			4.55	%
July			(12.18	)%			0.39	%
August			(8.41	)%			(2.71	)%
September			(9.77	)%			(0.48	)%
October			(28.63	)%			7.60	%
November			(18.38	)%			0.19	%
December			(17.80	)%			2.23	%
Annual Rate of Return			(56.12	)%**			25.52	%

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**         Partial from April 9, 2008.

For a definition of draw-down, please see text below “Composite Performance Data for US12NG.”

 

41

---

 

USSO:

Experience in Raising and Investing in Funds through December 31, 2009

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Dollar Amount Offered*:		$	1,500,000,000
Dollar Amount Raised:		$	14,290,534
Organizational and Offering Expenses**:
SEC registration fee:		$	49,125
FINRA registration fee:		$	75,500
Listing fee:		$	5,000
Auditor’s fees and expenses:		$	0
Legal fees and expenses:		$	512,460
Printing expenses:		$	23,945
Length of USSO Offering:		Continuous

*	Reflects the offering price per unit set forth on the cover page of the registration statement registering such units filed with the SEC.

**	These expenses were paid for by the General Partner.

Compensation to the General Partner and Other Compensation USSO:

Expenses paid by USSO through December 31, 2009 in dollar terms:

Expenses:		Amount in Dollar Terms
Amount Paid to General Partner:		$	20,150
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		$	4,695
Other Amounts Paid*:		$	212,443
Total Expenses Paid:		$	237,288
Expenses Waived**:		$	(206,444	)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		$	30,844

*	Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees and tax reporting fees and fees paid to the independent directors of the General Partner.

**	The General Partner, though under no obligation to do so, agreed to pay certain expenses, to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USSO’s NAV, on an annualized basis. The General Partner has no obligation to continue such payment into subsequent periods.

Expenses paid by USSO through December 31, 2009 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:		Amount as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid to General Partner:		0.60% annualized
Amount Paid in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:		0.14% annualized
Other Amounts Paid:		6.33% annualized
Total Expenses Paid:		7.07% annualized
Expenses Waived:		(6.15)% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:		0.92% annualized

 

 

42

---

 

USSO Performance:
Name of Commodity Pool:		USSO
Type of Commodity Pool:		Exchange traded security
Inception of Trading:		September 24, 2009
Aggregate Subscriptions (from inception through December 31, 2009):		$	14,290,534
Total Net Assets as of December 31, 2009:		$	13,196,305
Initial NAV per Unit as of Inception:		$	50.00
NAV per Unit as of December 31, 2009:		$	43.99
Worst Monthly Percentage Draw-down:		October 2009 (8.65)		%
Worst Peak-to-Valley Draw-down:		September 2009-December 2009 (12.02)		%
Number of Unitholders (as of December 31, 2009)			185

COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE DATA FOR USSO

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

		Rates of return*
Month		2009
January			–
February			–
March			–
April			–
May			–
June			–
July			–
August			–
September			(2.90	)%**
October			(8.65	)%
November			(0.25	)%
December			(0.57	)%
Annual Rate of Return			(12.02	)%**

*	The monthly rate of return is calculated by dividing the ending NAV of a given month by the ending NAV of the previous month, subtracting 1 and multiplying this number by 100 to arrive at a percentage increase or decrease.

**	Partial from September 24, 2009.

For a definition of draw-down, please see text below “Composite Performance Data for US12NG.”

Other Related Commodity Trading and Investment Management Experience

Until December 31, 2009, Ameristock Corporation was an affiliate of the General Partner.  Ameristock Corporation is a California-based registered investment advisor registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, that has been sponsoring and providing portfolio management services to mutual funds since 1995. Ameristock Corporation is the investment adviser to the Ameristock Mutual Fund, Inc., a mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), that focuses on large cap U.S. equities that has $219,616,809 in assets as of December 31, 2009. Ameristock Corporation was also the investment advisor to the Ameristock ETF Trust, an open-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act that consisted of five separate investment portfolios, each of which sought investment results, before fees and expenses, that corresponded generally to the price and yield performance of a particular U.S. Treasury securities index owned and compiled by Ryan Holdings LLC and Ryan ALM, Inc.  The Ameristock ETF Trust has liquidated each of its investment portfolios and has wound up its affairs.

 

43

---

 

Investments 

The General Partner applies substantially all of US12NG’s assets toward trading in Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents. The General Partner has sole authority to determine the percentage of assets that are:

·

held on deposit with the futures commission merchant or other custodian,

·

used for other investments, and

·

held in bank accounts to pay current obligations and as reserves.

  

The General Partner deposits substantially all of US12NG’s net assets with the Custodian or other custodian for trading. When US12NG purchases a Futures Contract and certain exchange traded Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, US12NG is required to deposit with the selling futures commission merchant on behalf of the exchange a portion of the value of the contract or other interest as security to ensure payment for the obligation under natural gas interests at maturity. This deposit is known as “margin.” US12NG invests the remainder of its assets equal to the difference between the margin deposited and the market value of the futures contract in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

 

US12NG’s assets are held in segregated accounts pursuant to the CEA and CFTC regulations. The General Partner believes that all entities that hold or trade US12NG’s assets are based in the United States and are subject to United States regulations.

 

Approximately 5% to 10% of US12NG’s assets have normally been committed as margin for Futures Contracts. However, from time to time, the percentage of assets committed as margin may be substantially more, or less, than such range. The General Partner invests the balance of US12NG’s assets not invested in natural gas interests or held in margin as reserves to be available for changes in margin. All interest income is used for US12NG’s benefit.

 

The futures commission merchant, a government agency or a commodity exchange could increase margins applicable to US12NG to hold trading positions at any time. Moreover, margin is merely a security deposit and has no bearing on the profit or loss potential for any positions taken.

US12NG’s assets will be held in segregated accounts pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.

The Commodity Interest Markets

 

General

 

The CEA governs the regulation of commodity interest transactions, markets and intermediaries. In December 2000, the CEA was amended by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (the “CFMA”), which substantially revised the regulatory framework governing certain commodity interest transactions and the markets on which they trade. The CEA, as amended by the CFMA, now provides for varying degrees of regulation of commodity interest transactions depending upon the variables of the transaction. In general, these variables include (1) the type of instrument being traded (e.g., contracts for future delivery, options, swaps or spot contracts), (2) the type of commodity underlying the instrument (distinctions are made between instruments based on agricultural commodities, energy and metals commodities and financial commodities), (3) the nature of the parties to the transaction (retail, eligible contract participant, or eligible commercial entity), (4) whether the transaction is entered into on a principal-to-principal or intermediated basis, (5) the type of market on which the transaction occurs, and (6) whether the transaction is subject to clearing through a clearing organization. Information regarding commodity interest transactions, markets and intermediaries, and their associated regulatory environment, is provided below.

44

---

 

Futures Contracts

 

A futures contract is a standardized contract traded on, or subject to the rules of, an exchange that calls for the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of a commodity at a specified time and place. Futures contracts are traded on a wide variety of commodities, including agricultural products, bonds, stock indices, interest rates, currencies, energy and metals. The size and terms of futures contracts on a particular commodity are identical and are not subject to any negotiation, other than with respect to price and the number of contracts traded between the buyer and seller.

 

The contractual obligations of a buyer or seller may generally be satisfied by taking or making physical delivery of the underlying of commodity or by making an offsetting sale or purchase of an identical futures contract on the same or linked exchange before the designated date of delivery. The difference between the price at which the futures contract is purchased or sold and the price paid for the offsetting sale or purchase, after allowance for brokerage commissions, constitutes the profit or loss to the trader. Some futures contracts, such as stock index contracts, settle in cash (reflecting the difference between the contract purchase/sale price and the contract settlement price) rather than by delivery of the underlying commodity.

 

In market terminology, a trader who purchases a futures contract is long in the market and a trader who sells a futures contract is short in the market. Before a trader closes out his long or short position by an offsetting sale or purchase, his outstanding contracts are known as open trades or open positions. The aggregate amount of open positions held by traders in a particular contract is referred to as the open interest in such contract.

 

Forward Contracts

 

A forward contract is a contractual obligation to purchase or sell a specified quantity of a commodity at or before a specified date in the future at a specified price and, therefore, is economically similar to a futures contract. Unlike futures contracts, however, forward contracts are typically traded in the over-the-counter markets and are not standardized contracts. Forward contracts for a given commodity are generally available for various amounts and maturities and are subject to individual negotiation between the parties involved. Moreover, generally there is no direct means of offsetting or closing out a forward contract by taking an offsetting position as one would a futures contract on a U.S. exchange. If a trader desires to close out a forward contract position, he generally will establish an opposite position in the contract but will settle and recognize the profit or loss on both positions simultaneously on the delivery date. Thus, unlike in the futures contract market where a trader who has offset positions will recognize profit or loss immediately, in the forward market a trader with a position that has been offset at a profit will generally not receive such profit until the delivery date, and likewise a trader with a position that has been offset at a loss will generally not have to pay money until the delivery date. In recent years, however, the terms of forward contracts have become more standardized, and in some instances such contracts now provide a right of offset or cash settlement as an alternative to making or taking delivery of the underlying commodity.

The forward markets provide what has typically been a highly liquid market for foreign exchange trading, and in certain cases the prices quoted for foreign exchange forward contracts may be more favorable than the prices for foreign exchange futures contracts traded on U.S. exchanges. The forward markets are largely unregulated. Forward contracts are, in general, not cleared or guaranteed by a third party. Commercial banks participating in trading foreign exchange forward contracts often do not require margin deposits, but rely upon internal credit limitations and their judgments regarding the creditworthiness of their counterparties. In recent years, however, many over-the-counter market participants in foreign exchange trading have begun to require that their counterparties post margin.

 

Further, as the result of the CFMA, over-the-counter derivative instruments such as forward contracts and swap agreements (and options on forwards and physical commodities) may begin to be traded on lightly-regulated exchanges or electronic trading platforms that may, but are not required to, provide for clearing facilities. Exchanges and electronic trading platforms on which over-the-counter instruments may be traded and the regulation and criteria for that trading are more fully described below under “Futures Exchanges and Clearing Organizations.” Nonetheless, absent a clearing facility, US12NG’s trading in foreign exchange and other forward contracts is exposed to the creditworthiness of the counterparties on the other side of the trade.

 

45

---

 

Options on Futures Contracts

 

Options on futures contracts are standardized contracts traded on an exchange. An option on a futures contract gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price (the striking, strike, or exercise price) in the underlying futures contract or underlying interest. The buyer of a call option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or take a long position in the underlying interest, and the buyer of a put option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to sell or take a short position in the underlying interest.

 

The seller, or writer, of an option is obligated to take a position in the underlying interest at a specified price opposite to the option buyer if the option is exercised. Thus, the seller of a call option must stand ready to take a short position in the underlying interest at the strike price if the buyer should exercise the option. The seller of a put option, on the other hand, must stand ready to take a long position in the underlying interest at the strike price.

 

A call option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is below current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is above current market levels. Conversely, a put option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is above the current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is below current market levels.

 

Options have limited life spans, usually tied to the delivery or settlement date of the underlying interest. Some options, however, expire significantly in advance of such date. The purchase price of an option is referred to as its premium, which consists of its intrinsic value (which is related to the underlying market value) plus its time value. As an option nears its expiration date, the time value shrinks and the market and intrinsic values move into parity. An option that is out-of-the-money and not offset by the time it expires becomes worthless. On certain exchanges, in-the-money options are automatically exercised on their expiration date, but on others unexercised options simply become worthless after their expiration date.

 

Regardless of how much the market swings, the most an option buyer can lose is the option premium. The option buyer deposits his premium with his broker, and the money goes to the option seller. Option sellers, on the other hand, face risks similar to participants in the futures markets. For example, since the seller of a call option is assigned a short futures position if the option is exercised, his risk is the same as someone who initially sold a futures contract. Because no one can predict exactly how the market will move, the option seller posts margin to demonstrate his ability to meet any potential contractual obligations.

 

Options on Forward Contracts or Commodities

 

Options on forward contracts or commodities operate in a manner similar to options on futures contracts. An option on a forward contract or commodity gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price in the underlying forward contract or commodity. However, similar to forward contracts, options on forward contracts or on commodities are individually negotiated contracts between counterparties and are typically traded in the over-the-counter market. Therefore, options on forward contracts and physical commodities possess many of the same characteristics of forward contracts with respect to offsetting positions and credit risk that are described above.

 

Swap Contracts

 

Swap transactions generally involve contracts between two parties to exchange a stream of payments computed by reference to a notional amount and the price of the asset that is the subject of the swap. Swap contracts are principally traded off-exchange, although recently, as a result of regulatory changes enacted as part of the CFMA, certain swap contracts are now being traded in electronic trading facilities and cleared through clearing organizations.

 

Swaps are usually entered into on a net basis, that is, the two payment streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the agreement, with the parties receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Swaps do not generally involve the delivery of underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is generally limited to the net amount of payments that the party is contractually obligated to make. In some swap transactions one or both parties may require collateral deposits from the counterparty to support that counterparty’s obligation under the swap agreement. If the counterparty to such a swap defaults, the risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the party is contractually entitled to receive less any collateral deposits it is holding.

 

46

---

 

Some swap transactions are cleared through central counterparties.  These transactions, known as cleared swaps, involve two counterparties first agreeing to the terms of a swap transaction, then submitting the transaction to a clearing house that acts as the central counterparty.  Once submitted to the clearing house, the original swap transaction is novated and the central counterparty becomes the counterparty to a trade with each of the original parties based upon the trade terms determined in the original transaction.  In this manner each individual swap counterparty reduces its risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance because the clearing house acts as the counterparty to each transaction.

Participants

 

The two broad classes of persons who trade commodities are hedgers and speculators. Hedgers include financial institutions that manage or deal in interest rate-sensitive instruments, foreign currencies or stock portfolios, and commercial market participants, such as farmers and manufacturers, that market or process commodities. Hedging is a protective procedure designed to effectively lock in prices that would otherwise change due to an adverse movement in the price of the underlying commodity, for example, the adverse price movement between the time a merchandiser or processor enters into a contract to buy or sell a raw or processed commodity at a certain price and the time he must perform the contract. In such a case, at the time the hedger contracts to physically sell the commodity at a future date he will simultaneously buy a futures or forward contract for the necessary equivalent quantity of the commodity. At the time for performance of the contract, the hedger may accept delivery under his futures contract and sell the commodity quantity as required by his physical contract or he may buy the actual commodity, sell it under the physical contract and close out his position by making an offsetting sale of a futures contract.

The commodity interest markets enable the hedger to shift the risk of price fluctuations. The usual objective of the hedger is to protect the profit that he expects to earn from farming, merchandising, or processing operations rather than to profit from his trading. However, at times the impetus for a hedge transaction may result in part from speculative objectives and hedgers can end up paying higher prices than they would have, for example, if current market prices are lower than the locked in price.

Unlike the hedger, the speculator generally expects neither to make nor take delivery of the underlying commodity. Instead, the speculator risks his capital with the hope of making profits from price fluctuations in the commodities. The speculator is, in effect, the risk bearer who assumes the risks that the hedger seeks to avoid. Speculators rarely make or take delivery of the underlying commodity; rather they attempt to close out their positions prior to the delivery date. Because the speculator may take either a long or short position in commodities, it is possible for him to make profits or incur losses regardless of whether prices go up or down.

 

Futures Exchanges and Clearing Organizations

 

Futures exchanges provide centralized market facilities in which multiple persons have the ability to execute or trade contracts by accepting bids and offers from multiple participants. Futures exchanges may provide for execution of trades at a physical location utilizing trading pits and/or may provide for trading to be done electronically through computerized matching of bids and offers pursuant to various algorithms. Members of a particular exchange and the trades executed on such exchange are subject to the rules of that exchange. Futures exchanges and clearing organizations are given reasonable latitude in promulgating rules and regulations to control and regulate their members. Examples of regulations by exchanges and clearing organizations include the establishment of initial margin levels, rules regarding trading practices, contract specifications, speculative position limits, daily price fluctuation limits, and execution and clearing fees.

 

47

---

 

Clearing organizations provide services designed to mutualize or transfer the credit risk arising from the trading of contracts on an exchange or other electronic trading facility. Once trades made between members of an exchange or electronic trading facility have been confirmed, the clearing organization becomes substituted for the clearing member acting on behalf of each buyer and each seller of contracts traded on the exchange or trading platform and in effect becomes the other party to the trade. Thereafter, each clearing member party to the trade looks only to the clearing organization for performance. The clearing organization generally establishes some sort of security or guarantee fund to which all clearing members of the exchange must contribute; this fund acts as an emergency buffer that is intended to enable the clearing organization to meet its obligations with regard to the other side of an insolvent clearing member’s contracts. Furthermore, the clearing organization requires margin deposits and continuously marks positions to market to provide some assurance that its members will be able to fulfill their contractual obligations. Thus, a central function of the clearing organization is to ensure the integrity of trades, and members effecting transactions on an exchange need not concern themselves with the solvency of the party on the opposite side of the trade; their only remaining concerns are the respective solvencies of their own customers, their clearing broker and the clearing organization. The clearing organizations do not deal with customers, but only with their member firms and the guarantee of performance for open positions provided by the clearing organization does not run to customers.

 

U.S. Futures Exchanges

 

Futures exchanges in the United States are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the CFTC based on their designation as one of the following: a designated contract market, a derivatives transaction execution facility, an exempt board of trade or an electronic trading facility.

A designated contract market is the most highly regulated level of futures exchange. Designated contract markets may offer products to retail customers on an unrestricted basis. To be designated as a contract market, the exchange must demonstrate that it satisfies specified general criteria for designation, such as having the ability to prevent market manipulation, rules and procedures to ensure fair and equitable trading, position limits, dispute resolution procedures, minimization of conflicts of interest and protection of market participants. Among the principal designated contract markets in the United States are the Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the NYMEX. Each of the designated contract markets in the United States must provide for the clearance and settlement of transactions with a CFTC-registered derivatives clearing organization.

A derivatives transaction execution facility (a “DTEF”) is a new type of exchange that is subject to fewer regulatory requirements than a designated contract market but is subject to both commodity interest and participant limitations. DTEFs limit access to eligible traders that qualify as either eligible contract participants or eligible commercial entities for futures and option contracts on commodities that have a nearly inexhaustible deliverable supply, are highly unlikely to be susceptible to the threat of manipulation, or have no cash market, security futures products, and futures and option contracts on commodities that the CFTC may determine, on a case-by-case basis, are highly unlikely to be susceptible to the threat of manipulation. In addition, certain commodity interests excluded or exempt from the CEA, such as swaps, etc. may be traded on a DTEF. There is no requirement that a DTEF use a clearing organization, except with respect to trading in security futures contracts, in which case the clearing organization must be a securities clearing agency. However, if futures contracts and options on futures contracts on a DTEF are cleared, then it must be through a CFTC-registered derivatives clearing organization, except that some excluded or exempt commodities traded on a DTEF may be cleared through a clearing organization other than one registered with the CFTC.

An exempt board of trade is also a newly designated form of exchange. An exempt board of trade is substantially unregulated, subject only to CFTC anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority. An exempt board of trade is permitted to trade futures contracts and options on futures contracts provided that the underlying commodity is not a security or securities index and has an inexhaustible deliverable supply or no cash market. All traders on an exempt board of trade must qualify as eligible contract participants. Contracts deemed eligible to be traded on an exempt board of trade include contracts on interest rates, exchange rates, currencies, credit risks or measures, debt instruments, measures of inflation, or other macroeconomic indices or measures. There is no requirement that an exempt board of trade use a clearing organization. However, if contracts on an exempt board of trade are cleared, then it must be through a CFTC-registered derivatives clearing organization. A board of trade electing to operate as an exempt board of trade must file a written notification with the CFTC.

 

48

---

 

An electronic trading facility is a new form of trading platform that operates by means of an electronic or telecommunications network and maintains an automated audit trail of bids, offers, and the matching of orders or the execution of transactions on the electronic trading facility. The CEA does not apply to, and the CFTC has no jurisdiction over, transactions on an electronic trading facility in certain excluded commodities that are entered into between principals that qualify as eligible contract participants, subject only to CFTC anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority. In general, excluded commodities include interest rates, currencies, securities, securities indices or other financial, economic or commercial indices or measures.

The General Partner intends to monitor the development of and opportunities and risks presented by the new less-regulated exchanges and exempt boards as well as other trading platforms currently in place or that are being considered by regulators and may, in the future, allocate a percentage of US12NG’s assets to trading in products on these exchanges. Provided US12NG maintains assets exceeding $5 million, US12NG would qualify as an eligible contract participant and thus would be able to trade on such exchanges.

Non-U.S. Futures Exchanges

 

Non-U.S. futures exchanges differ in certain respects from their U.S. counterparts. Importantly, non-U.S. futures exchanges are not subject to regulation by the CFTC, but rather are regulated by their home country regulator. In contrast to U.S. designated contract markets, some non-U.S. exchanges are principals’ markets, where trades remain the liability of the traders involved, and the exchange or an affiliated clearing organization, if any, does not become substituted for any party. Due to the absence of a clearing system, such exchanges are significantly more susceptible to disruptions. Further, participants in such markets must often satisfy themselves as to the individual creditworthiness of each entity with which they enter into a trade. Trading on non-U.S. exchanges is often in the currency of the exchange’s home jurisdiction. Consequently, US12NG is subject to the additional risk of fluctuations in the exchange rate between such currencies and U.S. dollars and the possibility that exchange controls could be imposed in the future. Trading on non-U.S. exchanges may differ from trading on U.S. exchanges in a variety of ways and, accordingly, may subject US12NG to additional risks.

Accountability Levels and Position Limits

 

The CFTC and U.S. designated contract markets have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than a hedger, which US12NG is not) may hold, own or control. Among the purposes of accountability levels and position limits is to prevent a corner or squeeze on a market or undue influence on prices by any single trader or group of traders. The position limits currently established by the CFTC apply to certain agricultural commodity interests, such as grains (oats, barley, and flaxseed), soybeans, corn, wheat, cotton, eggs, rye, and potatoes, but not to interests in energy products. In addition, U.S. exchanges may set accountability levels and position limits for all commodity interests traded on that exchange. For example, the current accountability level for investments at any one time in natural gas Futures Contracts (including investments in the Benchmark Futures Contract) on the NYMEX is 12,000 contracts. The NYMEX also imposes position limits on contracts held in the last few days of trading in the near month contract to expire. The ICE Futures has recently adopted similar accountability levels and position limits for certain of its Futures Contracts that are traded on the ICE Futures and settled against the price of a contract listed for trading on a U.S. designated contract market such as NYMEX.  In particular, the Henry Hub natural gas contract on the ICE Futures is subjected to the same accountability levels and positions limits as the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas contract upon which it settles as a result of the CFTC’s determination in July 2009 that the ICE Futures Henry Hub contract was a significant price discovery contract.  Certain exchanges or clearing organizations also set limits on the total net positions that may be held by a clearing broker. In general, no position limits are in effect in forward or other over-the-counter contract trading or in trading on non-U.S. futures exchanges, although the principals with which US12NG and the clearing brokers may trade in such markets may impose such limits as a matter of credit policy. For purposes of determining accountability levels and position limits, US12NG’s commodity interest positions will not be attributable to investors in their own commodity interest trading.

 

 

49

---

 

On January 26, 2010, the CFTC published a proposed rule that, if implemented, would set fixed position limits on certain energy Futures Contracts, including the NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures contract, NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract, NYMEX Light Sweet crude oil futures contract and NYMEX New York Harbor No. 2 heating oil futures contract, along with any contract based upon these contracts.  The proposed position limits would be set as a percentage of the open interest in these contracts for the spot month, any single month, and all months combined.  Additionally, the proposed rule would aggregate positions in the enumerated contracts and those based upon such contracts, including contracts listed on separate exchanges.  This proposal is currently undergoing a 90-day public comment period.

 

Daily Price Limits

 

Most U.S. futures exchanges (but generally not non-U.S. exchanges) may limit the amount of fluctuation in some futures contract or options on a futures contract prices during a single trading day by regulations. These regulations specify what are referred to as daily price fluctuation limits or, more commonly, daily limits. The daily limits establish the maximum amount that the price of a futures or options on futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular futures or options on futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond the limit. Positions in the futures or options contract may then be taken or liquidated, if at all, only at inordinate expense or if traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit during the period for trading on such day. Because the daily limit rule governs price movement only for a particular trading day, it does not limit losses and may in fact substantially increase losses because it may prevent the liquidation of unfavorable positions. Futures contract prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days, thus preventing prompt liquidation of positions and subjecting the trader to substantial losses for those days. The concept of daily price limits is not relevant to over-the-counter contracts, including forwards and swaps, and thus such limits are not imposed by banks and others who deal in those markets.

 

In contrast, the NYMEX does not impose daily limits but rather limits the amount of price fluctuation for Futures Contracts. For example, the NYMEX imposes a $3.00 per mmBtu ($30,000 per contract) price fluctuation limit for the Benchmark Futures Contract. This limit is initially based off the previous trading day’s settlement price. If any Benchmark Futures Contract is traded, bid, or offered at the limit for five minutes, trading is halted for five minutes. When trading resumes it begins at the point where the limit was imposed and the limit is reset to be $3.00 per mmBtu in either direction of that point. If another halt were triggered, the market would continue to be expanded by $3.00 per mmBtu in either direction after each successive five-minute trading halt. There is no maximum price fluctuation limit during any one trading session.

 

Commodity Prices

 

Commodity prices are volatile and, although ultimately determined by the interaction of supply and demand, are subject to many other influences, including the psychology of the marketplace and speculative assessments of future world and economic events. Political climate, interest rates, treaties, balance of payments, exchange controls and other governmental interventions as well as numerous other variables affect the commodity markets, and even with comparatively complete information it is impossible for any trader to predict reliably commodity prices.

Regulation

 

Futures exchanges in the United States are subject to varying degrees of regulation under the CEA depending on whether such exchange is a designated contract market, DTEF, exempt board of trade or electronic trading facility. Derivatives clearing organizations are also subject to the CEA and CFTC regulation. The CFTC is the governmental agency charged with responsibility for regulation of futures exchanges and commodity interest trading conducted on those exchanges. The CFTC’s function is to implement the CEA’s objectives of preventing price manipulation and excessive speculation and promoting orderly and efficient commodity interest markets. In addition, the various exchanges and clearing organizations themselves exercise regulatory and supervisory authority over their member firms.

 

50

---

 

The CFTC possesses exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the activities of CPOs and commodity trading advisors and has adopted regulations with respect to the activities of those persons and/or entities. Under the CEA, a registered CPO, such as the General Partner, is required to make annual filings with the CFTC describing its organization, capital structure, management and controlling persons. In addition, the CEA authorizes the CFTC to require and review books and records of, and documents prepared by, registered CPOs. Pursuant to this authority, the CFTC requires CPOs to keep accurate, current and orderly records for each pool that they operate. The CFTC may suspend the registration of a CPO (1) if the CFTC finds that the operator’s trading practices tend to disrupt orderly market conditions, (2) if any controlling person of the operator is subject to an order of the CFTC denying such person trading privileges on any exchange, and (3) in certain other circumstances. Suspension, restriction or termination of the General Partner’s registration as a CPO would prevent it, until that registration were to be reinstated, from managing US12NG, and might result in the termination of US12NG. US12NG itself is not required to be registered with the CFTC in any capacity.

 

The CEA gives the CFTC similar authority with respect to the activities of commodity trading advisors. If a trading advisor’s commodity trading advisor registration were to be terminated, restricted or suspended, the trading advisor would be unable, until the registration were to be reinstated, to render trading advice to US12NG.

 

The CEA requires all futures commission merchants, such as US12NG’s clearing brokers, to meet and maintain specified fitness and financial requirements, to segregate customer funds from proprietary funds and account separately for all customers’ funds and positions, and to maintain specified books and records open to inspection by the staff of the CFTC. The CFTC has similar authority over introducing brokers, or persons who solicit or accept orders for commodity interest trades but who do not accept margin deposits for the execution of trades. The CEA authorizes the CFTC to regulate trading by futures commission merchants and by their officers and directors, permits the CFTC to require action by exchanges in the event of market emergencies, and establishes an administrative procedure under which customers may institute complaints for damages arising from alleged violations of the CEA. The CEA also gives the states powers to enforce its provisions and the regulations of the CFTC.

 

US12NG’s investors are afforded prescribed rights for reparations under the CEA. Investors may also be able to maintain a private right of action for violations of the CEA. The CFTC has adopted rules implementing the reparation provisions of the CEA, which provide that any person may file a complaint for a reparations award with the CFTC for violation of the CEA against a floor broker or a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, CPO, and their respective associated persons.

 

Pursuant to authority in the CEA, the NFA has been formed and registered with the CFTC as a registered futures association. At the present time, the NFA is the only self-regulatory organization for commodity interest professionals, other than futures exchanges. The CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for the registration of commodity trading advisors, CPOs, futures commission merchants, introducing brokers, and their respective associated persons and floor brokers. The General Partner, each trading advisor, the selling agents and the clearing brokers are members of the NFA. As such, they are subject to NFA standards relating to fair trade practices, financial condition and consumer protection. US12NG itself is not required to become a member of the NFA. As the self-regulatory body of the commodity interest industry, the NFA promulgates rules governing the conduct of professionals and disciplines those professionals that do not comply with these rules. The NFA also arbitrates disputes between members and their customers and conducts registration and fitness screening of applicants for membership and audits of its existing members.

The regulations of the CFTC and the NFA prohibit any representation by a person registered with the CFTC or by any member of the NFA, that registration with the CFTC, or membership in the NFA, in any respect indicates that the CFTC or the NFA, as the case may be, has approved or endorsed that person or that person’s trading program or objectives. The registrations and memberships of the parties described in this summary must not be considered as constituting any such approval or endorsement. Likewise, no futures exchange has given or will give any similar approval or endorsement.

 

The regulation of commodity interest trading in the United States and other countries is an evolving area of the law. The various statements made in this summary are subject to modification by legislative action and changes in the rules and regulations of the CFTC, the NFA, the futures exchanges, clearing organizations and other regulatory bodies.

 

51

---

 

The function of the CFTC is to implement the objectives of the CEA of preventing price manipulation and other disruptions to market integrity, avoiding systemic risk, preventing fraud and promoting innovation, competition and financial integrity of transactions. As mentioned above, this regulation, among other things, provides that the trading of commodity interest contracts generally must be upon exchanges designated as contract markets or DTEFs and that all trading on those exchanges must be done by or through exchange members. Under the CFMA, commodity interest trading in some commodities between sophisticated persons may be traded on a trading facility not regulated by the CFTC. As a general matter, trading in spot contracts, forward contracts, options on forward contracts or commodities, or swap contracts between eligible contract participants is not within the jurisdiction of the CFTC and may therefore be effectively unregulated. The trading advisors may engage in those transactions on behalf of US12NG in reliance on this exclusion from regulation. However, legislation currently under consideration by the U.S. Congress would remove the exclusion provided to these transactions and place them under federal regulation.  The proposed legislation would subject these contracts to new capital, margin, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.

 

In general, the CFTC does not regulate the interbank and forward foreign currency markets with respect to transactions in contracts between certain sophisticated counterparties such as US12NG or between certain regulated institutions and retail investors. Although U.S. banks are regulated in various ways by the Federal Reserve Board, the Comptroller of the Currency and other U.S. federal and state banking officials, banking authorities do not regulate the forward markets.

 

While the U.S. government does not currently impose any restrictions on the movements of currencies, it could choose to do so. The imposition or relaxation of exchange controls in various jurisdictions could significantly affect the market for that and other jurisdictions’ currencies. Trading in the interbank market also exposes US12NG to a risk of default since failure of a bank with which US12NG had entered into a forward contract would likely result in a default and thus possibly substantial losses to US12NG.

 

The CFTC is prohibited by statute from regulating trading on non-U.S. futures exchanges and markets. The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relating to the marketing of non-U.S. futures contracts in the United States. These regulations permit certain contracts traded on non-U.S. exchanges to be offered and sold in the United States.

 

Commodity Margin

 

Original or initial margin is the minimum amount of funds that must be deposited by a commodity interest trader with the trader’s broker to initiate and maintain an open position in futures contracts. Maintenance margin is the amount (generally less than the original margin) to which a trader’s account may decline before he must deliver additional margin. A margin deposit is like a cash performance bond. It helps assure the trader’s performance of the futures contracts that he or she purchases or sells. Futures contracts are customarily bought and sold on initial margin that represents a very small percentage (ranging upward from less than 2%) of the aggregate purchase or sales price of the contract. Because of such low margin requirements, price fluctuations occurring in the futures markets may create profits and losses that, in relation to the amount invested, are greater than are customary in other forms of investment or speculation. As discussed below, adverse price changes in the futures contract may result in margin requirements that greatly exceed the initial margin. In addition, the amount of margin required in connection with a particular futures contract is set from time to time by the exchange on which the contract is traded and may be modified from time to time by the exchange during the term of the contract.

Brokerage firms, such as US12NG’s clearing brokers, carrying accounts for traders in commodity interest contracts may not accept lower, and generally require higher, amounts of margin as a matter of policy to further protect themselves. The clearing brokers require US12NG to make margin deposits equal to exchange minimum levels for all commodity interest contracts. This requirement may be altered from time to time in the clearing brokers’ discretion.

 

Trading in the over-the-counter markets where no clearing facility is provided generally does not require margin but generally does require the extension of credit between counterparties.  This extension of credit generally takes the form of transfers of collateral and/or independent amounts. Collateral is transferred between counterparties during the term of an over-the-counter transaction based upon the changing value of the transaction, while independent amounts are fixed amounts posted by one or both counterparties at the start of an over-the-counter transaction.

 

52

---

 

When a trader purchases an option, there is no margin requirement; however, the option premium must be paid in full. When a trader sells an option, on the other hand, he or she is required to deposit margin in an amount determined by the margin requirements established for the underlying interest and, in addition, an amount substantially equal to the current premium for the option. The margin requirements imposed on the selling of options, although adjusted to reflect the probability that out-of-the-money options will not be exercised, can in fact be higher than those imposed in dealing in the futures markets directly. Complicated margin requirements apply to spreads and conversions, which are complex trading strategies in which a trader acquires a mixture of options positions and positions in the underlying interest.

 

Margin requirements are computed each day by a trader’s clearing broker. When the market value of a particular open commodity interest position changes to a point where the margin on deposit does not satisfy maintenance margin requirements, a margin call is made by the broker. If the margin call is not met within a reasonable time, the broker may close out the trader’s position. With respect to US12NG’s trading, US12NG (and not its investors personally) is subject to margin calls.

 

Finally, many major U.S. exchanges have passed certain cross margining arrangements involving procedures pursuant to which the futures and options positions held in an account would, in the case of some accounts, be aggregated and margin requirements would be assessed on a portfolio basis, measuring the total risk of the combined positions.

 

SEC Reports

 

US12NG makes available, free of charge, on its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after these forms are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These reports are also available from the SEC though its website at:  www.sec.gov.

CFTC Reports

US12NG also makes available its monthly reports and its annual reports required to be prepared and filed with the NFA under the CFTC regulations.

Intellectual Property

The General Partner has filed trademark applications for UNITED STATES 12 MONTH NATURAL GAS FUND (U.S. App. Serial No. 77881066) for “investment services in the field of natural gas futures contracts and other natural gas related investments,” in use since November 18, 2009, and UNL UNITED STATES 12 MONTH NATURAL GAS FUND, LP (and Flame Design) (U.S. App. Serial No. 77881087) for “investment services in the field of natural gas futures contracts and other natural gas related investments,” in use since November 18, 2009.  US12NG relies upon these trademarks through which it markets its services and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential investors.  So long as US12NG continues to use these trademarks to identify its services, without challenge from any third party, and properly maintains and renews the trademark registrations under applicable laws, rules and regulations, it will continue to have indefinite protection for these trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations.

 

53

---

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The risk factors should be read in connection with the other information included in this annual report on Form 10-K, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and US12NG’s financial statements and the related notes.
  

Risks Associated With Investing Directly or Indirectly in Natural Gas

Investing in Natural Gas Interests subjects US12NG to the risks of the natural gas industry and this could result in large fluctuations in the price of US12NG’s units.

 

US12NG is subject to the risks and hazards of the natural gas industry because it invests in Natural Gas Interests. The risks and hazards that are inherent in the natural gas industry may cause the price of natural gas to widely fluctuate. If the changes in percentage terms of US12NG’s units accurately track the percentage changes in the Benchmark Futures Contract or the spot price of natural gas, then the price of its units may also fluctuate. The exploration for, and production of, natural gas is an uncertain process with many risks. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells for natural gas is often uncertain, and a number of factors can delay or prevent drilling operations or production, including:

 

·

unexpected drilling conditions;

·

pressure or irregularities in formations;

·

equipment failures or repairs;

·

fires or other accidents;

·

adverse weather conditions;

·

pipeline ruptures or spills; and

·

shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs and the delivery of equipment.

Natural gas transmission, distribution, gathering, and processing activities involve numerous risks that may affect the price of natural gas.

There are a variety of hazards inherent in natural gas transmission, distribution, gathering, and processing, such as leaks, explosions, pollution, release of toxic substances, adverse weather conditions (such as hurricanes and flooding), pipeline failure, abnormal pressures, uncontrollable flows of natural gas, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, physical damage to the gathering or transportation system, and other hazards which could affect the price of natural gas. To the extent these hazards limit the supply or delivery of natural gas, natural gas prices will increase.

The price of natural gas may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis and this would result in fluctuations in the price of US12NG’s units.

Natural gas prices fluctuate seasonally. For example, in some parts of the United States and other markets, the natural gas demand for power peaks during the cold winter months, with market prices peaking at that time. As a result, in the future, the overall price of natural gas may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal and quarterly basis and thus make consecutive period to period comparisons less relevant.

Natural gas transmission and storage operations are subject to government regulations and rate proceedings which could have an impact on the price of natural gas.

Natural gas transmission and storage operations in North America are subject to regulation and oversight by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, various state regulatory agencies, and Canadian regulatory authorities. These regulatory bodies have the authority to effect rate settlements on natural gas storage, transmission and distribution services. As a consequence, the price of natural gas may be affected by a change in the rate settlements effected by one or more of these regulatory bodies.

 

54

---

 

The price of US12NG’s units may be influenced by factors such as the short-term supply and demand for natural gas and the short-term supply and demand for US12NG’s units. This may cause the units to trade at a price that is above or below US12NG’s NAV per unit. Accordingly, changes in the price of units may substantially vary from the changes in the spot price of natural gas. If this variation occurs, then investors may not be able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge against natural gas-related losses or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

While it is expected that the trading prices of the units will fluctuate in accordance with changes in US12NG’s NAV, the prices of units may also be influenced by other factors, including the short-term supply and demand for natural gas and the units. There is no guarantee that the units will not trade at appreciable discounts from, and/or premiums to, US12NG’s NAV. This could cause changes in the price of the units to substantially vary from changes in the spot price of natural gas. This may be harmful to investors because if changes in the price of units vary substantially from changes in the spot price of natural gas, then investors may not be able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge the risk of losses in their natural gas-related transactions or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

Changes in US12NG’s NAV may not correlate with changes in the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract. If this were to occur, investors  may not be able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge against natural gas-related losses or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

The General Partner endeavors to invest US12NG’s assets as fully as possible in short-term Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments so that the changes in percentage terms of the NAV closely correlate with the changes in percentage terms in the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract. However, changes in US12NG’s NAV may not correlate with the changes in the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract for several reasons as set forth below:

·

US12NG (i) may not be able to buy/sell the exact amount of Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments to have a perfect correlation with NAV; (ii) may not always be able to buy and sell Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments at the market price; (iii) may not experience a perfect correlation between the spot price of natural gas and the underlying investments in Futures Contracts, Other Natural Gas-Related Investments and Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents; and (iv) is required to pay fees, including brokerage fees and the management fee, which will have an effect on the correlation.

·

Short-term supply and demand for natural gas may cause the changes in the market price of the Benchmark Futures Contract to vary from the changes in US12NG’s NAV if US12NG has fully invested in Futures Contracts that do not reflect such supply and demand and it is unable to replace such contracts with Futures Contracts that do reflect such supply and demand. In addition, there are also technical differences between the two markets, e.g., one is a physical market while the other is a futures market traded on exchanges, that may cause variations between the spot price of natural gas and the prices of related futures contracts.

·

US12NG plans to sell and buy only as many Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments that it can to get the changes in percentage terms of the NAV as close as possible to the changes in percentage terms in the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract. The remainder of its assets will be invested in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents and will be used to satisfy initial margin and additional margin requirements, if any, and to otherwise support its investments in Natural Gas Interests. Investments in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents, both directly and as margin, will provide rates of return that will vary from changes in the value of the spot price of natural gas and the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract.

·

In addition, because US12NG incurs certain expenses in connection with its investment activities, and holds most of its assets in more liquid short-term securities for margin and other liquidity purposes and for redemptions that may be necessary on an ongoing basis, the General Partner is generally not able to fully invest US12NG’s assets in Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments and there cannot be perfect correlation between changes in US12NG’s NAV and changes in the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract.

 

55

---

 

·

As US12NG grows, there may be more or less correlation. For example, if US12NG only has enough money to buy three Benchmark Futures Contracts and it needs to buy four contracts to track the price of natural gas then the correlation will be lower, but if it buys 20,000 Benchmark Futures Contracts and it needs to buy 20,001 contracts then the correlation will be higher. At certain asset levels, US12NG may be limited in its ability to purchase the Benchmark Futures Contract or other Futures Contracts due to accountability levels imposed by the relevant exchanges. To the extent that US12NG invests in these other Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, the correlation with the Benchmark Futures Contract may be lower. If US12NG is required to invest in other Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments that are less correlated with the Benchmark Futures Contract, US12NG would likely invest in over-the-counter contracts to increase the level of correlation of US12NG’s assets. Over-the-counter contracts entail certain risks described below under “Over-the-Counter Contract Risk.”

·

US12NG may not be able to buy the exact number of Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments to have a perfect correlation with the Benchmark Futures Contract if the purchase price of Futures Contracts required to be fully invested in such contracts is higher than the proceeds received for the sale of a Creation Basket on the day the basket was sold. In such case, US12NG could not invest the entire proceeds from the purchase of the Creation Basket in such Futures Contracts (for example, assume US12NG receives $4,000,000 for the sale of a Creation Basket and assume that the price of a Futures Contract for natural gas is $59,950, then US12NG could only invest in only 66 Futures Contracts with an aggregate value of $3,956,700), US12NG would be required to invest a percentage of the proceeds in cash, Treasuries or other liquid securities to be deposited as margin with the futures commission merchant through which the contract was purchased. The remainder of the purchase price for the Creation Basket would remain invested in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents or other liquid securities as determined by the General Partner from time to time based on factors such as potential calls for margin or anticipated redemptions. If the trading market for Futures Contracts is suspended or closed, US12NG may not be able to purchase these investments at the last reported price for such investments.

If changes in US12NG’s NAV do not correlate with changes in the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract, then investing in US12NG may not be an effective way to hedge against natural gas-related losses or indirectly invest in natural gas.

The Benchmark Futures Contract may not correlate with the spot price of natural gas and this could cause changes in the price of the units to substantially vary from the changes in the spot price of natural gas. If this were to occur, then investors may not be able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge against natural gas-related losses or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

When using the Benchmark Futures Contract as a strategy to track the spot price of natural gas, at best the correlation between changes in prices of such Natural Gas Interests and the spot price of natural gas can be only approximate. The degree of imperfection of correlation depends upon circumstances such as variations in the speculative natural gas market, supply of and demand for such Natural Gas Interests and technical influences in futures trading. If there is a weak correlation between the Natural Gas Interests and the spot price of natural gas, then the price of units may not accurately track the spot price of natural gas and investors may not be able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge the risk of losses in their natural gas-related transactions or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

US12NG may experience a loss if it is required to sell Treasuries at a price lower than the price at which they were acquired.

The value of Treasuries generally moves inversely with movements in interest rates. If US12NG is required to sell Treasuries at a price lower than the price at which they were acquired, US12NG will experience a loss. This loss may adversely impact the price of the units and may decrease the correlation between the price of the units, the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, and the spot price of natural gas.

 

56

---

 

Certain of US12NG’s investments could be illiquid which could cause large losses to investors at any time or from time to time.

US12NG may not always be able to liquidate its positions in its investments at the desired price. It is difficult to execute a trade at a specific price when there is a relatively small volume of buy and sell orders in a market. A market disruption, such as a foreign government taking political actions that disrupt the market in its currency, its natural gas production or exports, or in another major export, can also make it difficult to liquidate a position. Alternatively, limits imposed by futures exchanges or other regulatory organizations, such as accountability levels, position limits and daily price fluctuation limits, may contribute to a lack of liquidity with respect to some commodity interests.

Unexpected market illiquidity may cause major losses to investors at any time or from time to time. In addition, US12NG has not and does not intend at this time to establish a credit facility, which would provide an additional source of liquidity and instead will rely only on the Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that it holds. The anticipated large value of the positions in Futures Contracts that the General Partner will acquire or enter into for US12NG increases the risk of illiquidity. The Other Natural Gas-Related Investments that US12NG invests in, such as negotiated over-the-counter contracts, may have a greater likelihood of being illiquid since they are contracts between two parties that take into account not only market risk, but also the relative credit, tax, and settlement risks under such contracts. Such contracts also have limited transferability that results from such risks and the contract’s express limitations.

Because both Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments may be illiquid, US12NG’s Natural Gas Interests may be more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices in periods of illiquid markets and losses may be incurred during the period in which positions are being liquidated.

If the nature of hedgers and speculators in futures markets has shifted such that natural gas purchasers are the predominant hedgers in the market, US12NG might have to reinvest at higher futures prices or choose Other Natural Gas-Related Investments.

The changing nature of the hedgers and speculators in the natural gas market influences whether futures prices are above or below the expected future spot price. In order to induce speculators to take the corresponding long side of the same futures contract, natural gas producers must generally be willing to sell futures contracts at prices that are below expected future spot prices. Conversely, if the predominant hedgers in the futures market are the purchasers of the natural gas who purchase futures contracts to hedge against a rise in prices, then speculators will only take the short side of the futures contract if the futures price is greater than the expected future spot price of natural gas. This can have significant implications for US12NG when it is time to reinvest the proceeds from a maturing Futures Contract into a new Futures Contract.

While US12NG does not intend to take physical delivery of natural gas under its Futures Contracts, physical delivery under such contracts impacts the value of the contracts.

While it is not the current intention of US12NG to take physical delivery of natural gas under its Futures Contracts, futures contracts are not required to be cash-settled and it is possible to take delivery under some of these contracts. Storage costs associated with purchasing natural gas could result in costs and other liabilities that could impact the value of Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments. Storage costs include the time value of money invested in natural gas as a physical commodity plus the actual costs of storing the natural gas less any benefits from ownership of natural gas that are not obtained by the holder of a futures contract. In general, Futures Contracts have a one-month delay for contract delivery and the back month (the back month is any future delivery month other than the spot month) includes storage costs. To the extent that these storage costs change for natural gas while US12NG holds Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, the value of the Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, and therefore US12NG’s NAV, may change as well.

 

57

---

 

The price relationship between the near month contract and the next month contract that compose the Benchmark Futures Contract will vary and may impact both the total return over time of US12NG’s NAV, as well as the degree to which its total return tracks other natural gas price indices’ total returns.

The design of US12NG’s Benchmark Futures Contract is such that every month it begins by using the near month contract to expire until the near month contract is within two weeks of expiration, when, over a four-day period, it transitions to the next month contract to expire as its benchmark contract and keeps that contract as its benchmark until it becomes the near month contract and close to expiration. In the event of a natural gas futures market where near month contracts trade at a higher price than next month to expire contracts, a situation described as “backwardation” in the futures market, then absent the impact of the overall movement in natural gas prices the value of the benchmark contract would tend to rise as it approaches expiration. As a result the total return of the Benchmark Futures Contract would tend to track higher. Conversely, in the event of a natural gas futures market where near month contracts trade at a lower price than next month contracts, a situation described as “contango” in the futures market, then absent the impact of the overall movement in natural gas prices the value of the benchmark contract would tend to decline as it approaches expiration. As a result, the total return of the Benchmark Futures Contract would tend to track lower. When compared to total return of other price indices, such as the spot price of natural gas, the impact of backwardation and contango may lead the total return of US12NG’s NAV to vary significantly. In the event of a prolonged period of contango, and absent the impact of rising or falling natural gas prices, this could have a significant negative impact on US12NG’s NAV and total return.

Regulation of the commodity interests and energy markets is extensive and constantly changing; future regulatory developments are impossible to predict but may significantly and adversely affect US12NG.

The futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations, and margin requirements. In addition, the CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading. The regulation of futures transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action.

The regulation of commodity interest transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to ongoing modification by governmental and judicial action. Considerable regulatory attention has been focused on non-traditional investment pools which are publicly distributed in the United States. There is a possibility of future regulatory changes altering, perhaps to a material extent, the nature of an investment in US12NG or the ability of US12NG to continue to implement its investment strategy. In addition, various national governments have expressed concern regarding the disruptive effects of speculative trading in the energy markets and the need to regulate the derivatives markets in general. The effect of any future regulatory change on US12NG is impossible to predict, but could be substantial and adverse.

In the wake of the economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, the Administration, federal regulators and Congress are revisiting the regulation of the financial sector, including securities and commodities markets. These efforts are likely to result in significant changes in the regulation of these markets.

Currently, a number of proposals that would alter the regulation of Natural Gas Interests are being considered by federal regulators and Congress. These proposals include the imposition of fixed position limits on energy-based commodity futures contracts, extension of position and accountability limits to futures contracts on non-U.S. exchanges previously exempt from such limits, and the forced use of clearinghouse mechanisms for all over-the-counter transactions. Certain proposals would aggregate and limit all positions in energy futures held by a single entity, whether such positions exist on U.S. futures exchanges, non-U.S. futures exchanges, or in over-the-counter contracts. While it cannot be predicted at this time what reforms will eventually be made or how they will impact US12NG, if any of the aforementioned proposals are implemented, US12NG’s ability to meet its investment objective may be negatively impacted and investors could be adversely affected.

 

58

---

 

Additionally, on January 26, 2010, the CFTC published a proposed rule that, if implemented, would set fixed position limits on certain energy Futures Contracts including the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract, NYMEX Light Sweet crude oil futures contract, NYMEX New York Harbor No. 2 heating oil futures contract, and NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures contract, along with any contract based upon these contracts.  The proposed position limits would be set as a percentage of the open interest in these contracts for the spot month, any single month, and all months combined.  Additionally, the proposed rule would aggregate positions in the enumerated contracts and those based upon such contracts, including contracts listed on separate exchanges.  This proposal is currently undergoing a 90-day public comment period.

Investing in US12NG for purposes of hedging may be subject to several risks including the possibility of losing the benefit of favorable market movement.

Participants in the natural gas or in other industries may use US12NG as a vehicle to hedge the risk of losses in their natural gas-related transactions. There are several risks in connection with using US12NG as a hedging device. While hedging can provide protection against an adverse movement in market prices, it can also preclude a hedger’s opportunity to benefit from a favorable market movement. In a hedging transaction, the hedger may be concerned that the hedged item will increase in price, but must recognize the risk that the price may instead decline and if this happens he will have lost his opportunity to profit from the change in price because the hedging transaction will result in a loss rather than a gain. Thus, the hedger foregoes the opportunity to profit from favorable price movements.

In addition, if the hedge is not a perfect one, the hedger can lose on the hedging transaction and not realize an offsetting gain in the value of the underlying item being hedged.

When using futures contracts as a hedging technique, at best, the correlation between changes in prices of futures contracts and of the items being hedged can be only approximate. The degree of imperfection of correlation depends upon circumstances such as: variations in speculative markets, demand for futures and for natural gas products, technical influences in futures trading, and differences between anticipated energy costs being hedged and the instruments underlying the standard futures contracts available for trading. Even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree because of unexpected market behavior as well as the expenses associated with creating the hedge.

In addition, using an investment in US12NG as a hedge for changes in energy costs (e.g., investing in natural gas, crude oil, gasoline, or other fuels, or electricity) may not correlate because changes in the spot price may vary from changes in energy costs because the spot price of natural gas may not be at the same rate as changes in the price of other energy products, and, in any case, the price of natural gas does not reflect the refining, transportation, and other costs that may impact the hedger’s energy costs.

An investment in US12NG may provide little or no diversification benefits. Thus, in a declining market, US12NG may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and an investor may suffer losses on an investment in US12NG while incurring losses with respect to other asset classes.

Historically, Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments have generally been non-correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Non-correlation means that there is a low statistically valid relationship between the performance of futures and other commodity interest transactions, on the one hand, and stocks or bonds, on the other hand. However, there can be no assurance that such non-correlation will continue during future periods. If, contrary to historic patterns, US12NG’s performance were to move in the same general direction as the financial markets, investors will obtain little or no diversification benefits from an investment in the units. In such a case, US12NG may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and investors may suffer losses on their investment in US12NG at the same time they incur losses with respect to other investments.

Variables such as drought, floods, weather, embargoes, tariffs and other political events may have a larger impact on natural gas prices and natural gas-linked instruments, including Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments, than on traditional securities. These additional variables may create additional investment risks that subject US12NG’s investments to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities.

 

59

---

 

Non-correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance of two asset classes would be opposite of each other. There is no historic evidence that the spot price of natural gas and prices of other financial assets, such as stocks and bonds, are negatively correlated. In the absence of negative correlation, US12NG cannot be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the stock market, or vice versa.

US12NG’s Operating Risks

 

US12NG is not a registered investment company so unitholders do not have the protections of the 1940 Act.

 

US12NG is not an investment company subject to the 1940 Act. Accordingly, investors do not have the protections afforded by that statute which, for example, requires investment companies to have a majority of disinterested directors and regulates the relationship between the investment company and its investment manager.

 

The General Partner is leanly staffed and relies heavily on key personnel to manage trading activities.

 

In managing and directing the day-to-day activities and affairs of US12NG, the General Partner relies heavily on Messrs. Howard Mah and John Hyland.  If Messrs. Mah or Hyland were to leave or be unable to carry out their present responsibilities, it may have an adverse effect on the management of US12NG. Furthermore, Messrs. Mah and Hyland are currently involved in the management of the Related Public Funds, and the General Partner has filed a registration statement for two other exchange traded security funds, USBO and USCI. Mr. Mah is also employed by Ameristock Corporation, a registered investment adviser that manages a public mutual fund. It is estimated that Mr. Mah will spend approximately 90% of his time on US12NG and Related Public Fund matters.  Mr. Hyland will spend approximately 85% of his time on US12NG and Related Public Fund matters. To the extent that the General Partner establishes additional funds, even greater demands will be placed on Messrs. Gerber, Mah and Hyland, as well as the other officers of the General Partner and its Board of Directors.

Accountability levels, position limits, and daily price fluctuation limits set by the exchanges have the potential to cause a tracking error, which could cause the price of units to substantially vary from the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract and prevent investors from being able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge against natural gas-related losses or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

 

U.S. designated contract markets such as the NYMEX have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which an investment by US12NG is not) may hold, own or control. For example, the current accountability level for investments at any one time in natural gas futures contracts (including investments in the Benchmark Futures Contract) is 12,000. While this is not a fixed ceiling, it is a threshold above which the NYMEX may exercise greater scrutiny and control over an investor, including limiting an investor to holding no more than 12,000 natural gas futures contracts. With regard to position limits, the NYMEX limits an investor from holding more than 1,000 net futures in the last 3 days of trading in the near month contract to expire.

In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX also sets daily price fluctuation limits on futures contracts. The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

For example, the NYMEX imposes a $3.00 per mmBtu ($30,000 per contract) price fluctuation limit for natural gas futures contracts. This limit is initially based off of the previous trading day’s settlement price. If any natural gas futures contract is traded, bid, or offered at the limit for five minutes, trading is halted for five minutes. When trading resumes it begins at the point where the limit was imposed and the limit is reset to be $3.00 per mmBtu in either direction of that point. If another halt were triggered, the market would continue to be expanded by $3.00 per mmBtu in either direction after each successive five-minute trading halt. There is no maximum price fluctuation limit during any one trading session.

 

60

---

 

U.S. futures exchanges, including the NYMEX, currently do not implement fixed position limits for Futures Contracts held outside of the last few days of trading in the near month contract to expire.  However, on January 26, 2010, the CFTC published a proposed rule that, if implemented, would set fixed position limits on energy Futures Contracts, including the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract, NYMEX Light Sweet crude oil futures contract, NYMEX New York Harbor No. 2 heating oil futures contract, and NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures contract, along with any contract based upon these contracts.  The proposed position limits would be set as a percentage of the open interest in these contracts for the spot month, any single month, and all months combined.  Additionally, the proposed rule would aggregate positions in the enumerated contracts and those based upon such contracts, including contracts listed on separate exchanges.  This proposal is currently undergoing a 90-day public comment period.

All of these limits may potentially cause a tracking error between the price of the units and the price of the Benchmark Futures Contract. This may in turn prevent investors from being able to effectively use US12NG as a way to hedge against natural gas-related losses or as a way to indirectly invest in natural gas.

US12NG has not limited the size of its offering and is committed to utilizing substantially all of its proceeds to purchase Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments. If US12NG encounters accountability levels, position limits, or price fluctuation limits for Futures Contracts on the NYMEX, it may then, if permitted under applicable regulatory requirements, purchase Futures Contracts and Other Natural Gas-Related Investments on the ICE Futures or other exchanges that trade listed natural gas futures. The Futures Contracts available on the ICE Futures are comparable to the contracts on the NYMEX, but they may have different underlying commodities, sizes, deliveries, and prices. In addition, certain of the Futures Contracts available on the ICE Futures are subject to accountability levels and position limits.

There are technical and fundamental risks inherent in the trading system the General Partner intends to employ.

 

The General Partner’s trading system is quantitative in nature and it is possible that the General Partner might make a mathematical error. In addition, it is also possible that a computer or software program may malfunction and cause an error in computation.

 

To the extent that the General Partner uses spreads and straddles as part of its trading strategy, there is the risk that the NAV may not closely track the changes in the Benchmark Futures Contract.

Spreads combine simultaneous long and short positions in related futures contracts that differ by commodity (e.g., long crude oil and short gasoline), by market (e.g., long WTI crude futures, short Brent crude futures), or by delivery month (e.g., long December, short November). Spreads gain or lose value as a result of relative changes in price between the long and short positions. Spreads often reduce risk to investors, because the contracts tend to move up or down together. However, both legs of the spread could move against an investor simultaneously, in which case the spread would lose value. Certain types of spreads may face unlimited risk, e.g., because the price of a futures contract underlying a short position can increase by an unlimited amount and the investor would have to take delivery or offset at that price.

A commodity straddle takes both long and short option positions in the same commodity in the same market and delivery month simultaneously. The buyer of a straddle profits if either the long or the short leg of the straddle moves further than the combined cost of both options. The seller of a straddle profits if both the long and short positions do not trade beyond a range equal to the combined premium for selling both options.

If the General Partner were to utilize a spread or straddle position and the spread performed differently than expected, the results could impact US12NG’s tracking error. This could affect US12NG’s investment objective of having its NAV closely track the changes in the Benchmark Futures Contract. Additionally, a loss on a spread position would negatively impact US12NG’s absolute return.

 

61

---

 

US12NG and the General Partner may have conflicts of interest, which may permit them to favor their own interests to the detriment of unitholders.

 

US12NG and the General Partner may have inherent conflicts to the extent the General Partner attempts to maintain US12NG’s asset size in order to preserve its fee income and this may not always be consistent with US12NG’s objective of having the value of its units’ NAV track changes in the Benchmark Futures Contract. The General Partner’s officers, directors and employees do not devote their time exclusively to US12NG. These persons are directors, officers or employees of other entities that may compete with US12NG for their services. They could have a conflict between their responsibilities to US12NG and to those other entities.

In addition, the General Partner’s principals, officers, directors or employees may trade futures and related contracts for their own account. A conflict of interest may exist if their trades are in the same markets and at the same time as US12NG trades using the clearing broker to be used by US12NG. A potential conflict also may occur if the General Partner’s principals, officers, directors or employees trade their accounts more aggressively or take positions in their accounts which are opposite, or ahead of, the positions taken by US12NG.

 

The General Partner has sole current authority to manage the investments and operations of US12NG, and this may allow it to act in a way that furthers its own interests which may create a conflict with the best interests of investors. Limited partners have limited voting control, which will limit the ability to influence matters such as amendment of the LP Agreement, change in US12NG’s basic investment policy, dissolution of this fund, or the sale or distribution of US12NG’s assets.

 

The General Partner serves as the general partner to each of US12NG and the Related Public Funds and will serve as the general partner for USBO and the sponsor for USCI, if such funds offer their securities to the public or begin operations. The General Partner may have a conflict to the extent that its trading decisions for US12NG may be influenced by the effect they would have on the other funds it manages. These trading decisions may be influenced since the General Partner also serves as the general partner for all of the funds and is required to meet all of the funds’ investment objectives as well as US12NG’s. If the General Partner believes that a trading decision it made on behalf of US12NG might (i) impede its other funds from reaching their investment objectives, or (ii) improve the likelihood of meeting its other funds’ objectives, then the General Partner may choose to change its trading decision for US12NG, which could either impede or improve the opportunity for US12NG to meet its investment objective. In addition, the General Partner is required to indemnify the officers and directors of its other funds if the need for indemnification arises. This potential indemnification will cause the General Partner’s assets to decrease. If the General Partner’s other sources of income are not sufficient to compensate for the indemnification, then the General Partner may terminate and investors could lose their investment.

 

Unitholders may only vote on the removal of the General Partner and limited partners have only limited voting rights. Unitholders and limited partners will not participate in the management of US12NG and do not control the General Partner so they will not have influence over basic matters that affect US12NG.

 

Unitholders that have not applied to become limited partners have no voting rights, other than to remove the General Partner. Limited partners will have limited voting rights with respect to US12NG’s affairs. Unitholders may remove the General Partner only if 66 2/3% of the unitholders elect to do so. Unitholders and limited partners will not be permitted to participate in the management or control of US12NG or the conduct of its business. Unitholders and limited partners must therefore rely upon the duties and judgment of the General Partner to manage US12NG’s affairs.

The General Partner may manage a large amount of assets and this could affect US12NG’s ability to trade profitably.

 

Increases in assets under management may affect trading decisions. In general, the General Partner does not intend to limit the amount of assets of US12NG that it may manage. The more assets the General Partner manages, the more difficult it may be for it to trade profitably because of the difficulty of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and performance and of managing risk associated with larger positions.

 

62

---

 

US12NG could terminate at any time and cause the liquidation and potential loss of an investor’s investment and could upset the overall maturity and timing of an investor’s investment portfolio.

 

US12NG may terminate at any time, regardless of whether US12NG has incurred losses, subject to the terms of the LP Agreement. In particular, unforeseen circumstances, including the death, adjudication of incompetence, bankruptcy, dissolution, or removal of the General Partner could cause US12NG to terminate unless a majority interest of the limited partners within 90 days of the event elects to continue the partnership and appoints a successor general partner, or the affirmative vote of a majority in interest of the limited partners subject to certain conditions. However, no level of losses will require the General Partner to terminate US12NG. US12NG’s termination would cause the liquidation and potential loss of an investor’s investment. Termination could also negatively affect the overall maturity and timing of an investor’s investment portfolio.

Limited partners may not have limited liability in certain circumstances, including potentially having liability for the return of wrongful distributions.

Under Delaware law, a limited partner might be held liable for US12NG’s obligations as if it were a General Partner if the limited partner participates in the control of the partnership’s business and the persons who transact business with the partnership think the limited partner is the General Partner.

 

A limited partner will not be liable for assessments in addition to its initial capital investment in any of US12NG’s capital securities representing units. However, a limited partner may be required to repay to US12NG any amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to it under some circumstances. Under Delaware law, US12NG may not make a distribution to limited partners if the distribution causes US12NG’s liabilities (other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and nonrecourse liabilities) to exceed the fair value of US12NG’s assets. Delaware law provides that a limited partner who receives such a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution violated the law will be liable to the limited partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years from the date of the distribution.

 

With adequate notice, a limited partner may be required to withdraw from the partnership for any reason.

 

If the General Partner gives at least fifteen (15) days’ written notice to a limited partner, then the General Partner may for any reason, in its sole discretion, require any such limited partner to withdraw entirely from the partnership or to withdraw a portion of its partner capital account. The General Partner may require withdrawal even in situations where the limited partner has complied completely with the provisions of the LP Agreement.

 

US12NG’s existing units are, and any units US12NG issues in the future will be, subject to restrictions on transfer. Failure to satisfy these requirements will preclude a transferee from being able to have all the rights of a limited partner.

 

No transfer of any unit or interest therein may be made if such transfer would (a) violate the then applicable federal or state securities laws or rules and regulations of the SEC, any state securities commission, the CFTC or any other governmental authority with jurisdiction over such transfer, or (b) cause US12NG to be taxable as a corporation or affect US12NG’s existence or qualification as a limited partnership. In addition, investors may only become limited partners if they transfer their units to purchasers that meet certain conditions outlined in the LP Agreement, which provides that each record holder or limited partner or unitholder applying to become a limited partner (each a record holder) may be required by the General Partner to furnish certain information, including that holder’s nationality, citizenship or other related status. A transferee who is not a U.S. resident may not be eligible to become a record holder or a limited partner if its ownership would subject US12NG to the risk of cancellation or forfeiture of any of its assets under any federal, state or local law or regulation. All purchasers of US12NG’s units, who wish to become limited partners or record holders, and receive cash distributions, if any, or have certain other rights, must deliver an executed transfer application in which the purchaser or transferee must certify that, among other things, he, she or it agrees to be bound by US12NG’s LP Agreement and is eligible to purchase US12NG’s securities. Any transfer of units will not be recorded by the transfer agent or recognized by US12NG unless a completed transfer application is delivered to the General Partner or the Administrator. A person purchasing US12NG’s existing units, who does not execute a transfer application and certify that the purchaser is eligible to purchase those securities acquires no rights in those securities other than the right to resell those securities. Whether or not a transfer application is received or the consent of the General Partner obtained, US12NG’s units will be securities and will be transferable according to the laws governing transfers of securities. See “Transfer of Units.”

 

63

---

 

 

US12NG does not expect to make cash distributions.

 

The General Partner has not previously made any cash distributions and intends to re-invest any realized gains in Natural Gas Interests rather than distributing cash to limited partners. Therefore, unlike mutual funds, commodity pools or other investment pools that actively manage their investments in an attempt to realize income and gains from their investing activities and distribute such income and gains to their investors, US12NG generally does not expect to distribute cash to limited partners. An investor should not invest in US12NG if it will need cash distributions from US12NG to pay taxes on its share of income and gains of US12NG, if any, or for any other reason. Although US12NG does not intend to make cash distributions, the income earned from its investments held directly or posted as margin may reach levels that merit distribution, e.g., at levels where such income is not necessary to support its underlying investments in Natural Gas Interests and investors adversely react to being taxed on such income without receiving distributions that could be used to pay such tax. If this income becomes significant then cash distributions may be made.

There is a risk that US12NG will not earn trading gains sufficient to compensate for the fees and expenses that it must pay and as such US12NG may not earn any profit.

 

US12NG pays brokerage charges of approximately 0.34%, based on futures commission merchant fees of $3.50 per buy or sell, management fees of 0.60% of NAV per annum on average net assets, and over-the-counter spreads and extraordinary expenses (e.g., subsequent offering expenses, other expenses not in the ordinary course of business, including the indemnification of any person against liabilities and obligations to the extent permitted by law and required under the LP Agreement and under agreements entered into by the General Partner on US12NG’s behalf and the bringing and defending of actions at law or in equity and otherwise engaging in the conduct of litigation and the incurring of legal expenses and the settlement of claims and litigation) that can not be quantified. These fees and expenses must be paid in all cases regardless of whether US12NG’s activities are profitable. Accordingly, US12NG must earn trading gains sufficient to compensate for these fees and expenses before it can earn any profit.

 

If offerings of the units do not raise sufficient funds to pay US12NG’s future expenses and no other source of funding of expenses is found, US12NG may be forced to terminate and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Prior to the offering of units that commenced on November 18, 2009, all of US12NG’s expenses were funded by the General Partner and its affiliates. These payments by the General Partner and its affiliates were designed to allow US12NG the ability to commence the public offering of its units. US12NG now directly pays certain of these fees and expenses. The General Partner will continue to pay other fees and expenses, as set forth in the LP Agreement. If the General Partner and US12NG are unable to raise sufficient funds to cover their expenses or locate any other source of funding, US12NG may be forced to terminate and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

US12NG may incur higher fees and expenses upon renewing existing or entering into new contractual relationships.

 

The clearing arrangements between the clearing brokers and US12NG generally are terminable by the clearing brokers once the clearing broker has given US12NG notice. Upon termination, the General Partner may be required to renegotiate or make other arrangements for obtaining similar services if US12NG intends to continue trading in Futures Contracts or Other Natural Gas-Related Investments at its present level of capacity. The services of any clearing broker may not be available, or even if available, these services may not be available on the terms as favorable as those of the expired or terminated clearing arrangements.

 

64

---

 

US12NG may miss certain trading opportunities because it will not receive the benefit of the expertise of independent trading advisors.

 

The General Partner does not employ trading advisors for US12NG; however, it reserves the right to employ them in the future. The only advisor to US12NG is the General Partner. A lack of independent trading advisors may be disadvantageous to US12NG because it will not receive the benefit of a trading advisor’s expertise.

 

An unanticipated number of redemption requests during a short period of time could have an adverse effect on the NAV of US12NG.

 

If a substantial number of requests for redemption of Redemption Baskets are received by US12NG during a relatively short period of time, US12NG may not be able to satisfy the requests from US12NG’s assets not committed to trading. As a consequence, it could be necessary to liquidate positions in US12NG’s trading positions before the time that the trading strategies would otherwise dictate liquidation.

 

The financial markets are currently in a period of disruption and US12NG does not expect these conditions to improve in the near future. 

Currently and throughout 2008 and 2009, the financial markets have experienced very difficult conditions and volatility as well as significant adverse trends. The conditions in these markets have resulted in a decrease in availability of corporate credit and liquidity and have led indirectly to the insolvency, closure or acquisition of a number of major financial institutions and have contributed to further consolidation within the financial services industry. A continued recession or a depression could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of US12NG’s service providers and Authorized Purchasers which would impact the ability of the General Partner to achieve US12NG’s investment objective.

The failure or bankruptcy of a clearing broker could result in a substantial loss of US12NG’s assets; the clearing broker could be subject to proceedings that impair its ability to execute US12NG’s trades.

 

Under CFTC regulations, a clearing broker maintains customers’ assets in a bulk segregated account. If a clearing broker fails to do so, or is unable to satisfy a substantial deficit in a customer account, its other customers may be subject to risk of a substantial loss of their funds in the event of that clearing broker’s bankruptcy. In that event, the clearing broker’s customers, such as US12NG, are entitled to recover, even in respect of property specifically traceable to them, only a proportional share of all property available for distribution to all of that clearing broker’s customers. The bankruptcy of a clearing broker could result in the complete loss of US12NG’s assets posted with the clearing broker; though the vast majority of US12NG’s assets are held in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents with US12NG’s custodian and would not be impacted by the bankruptcy of a clearing broker. US12NG also may be subject to the risk of the failure of, or delay in performance by, any exchanges and markets and their clearing organizations, if any, on which commodity interest contracts are traded.

From time to time, the clearing brokers may be subject to legal or regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of their business. A clearing broker’s involvement in costly or time-consuming legal proceedings may divert financial resources or personnel away from the clearing broker’s trading operations, which could impair the clearing broker’s ability to successfully execute and clear US12NG’s trades.

 

The failure or insolvency of US12NG’s custodian could result in a substantial loss of US12NG’s assets.

 

As noted above, the vast majority of US12NG’s assets are held in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents with US12NG’s custodian. The insolvency of the custodian could result in a complete loss of US12NG’s assets held by that custodian, which, at any given time, would likely comprise a substantial portion of US12NG’s total assets.

 

65

---

 

Third parties may infringe upon or otherwise violate intellectual property rights or assert that the General Partner has infringed or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights, which may result in significant costs and diverted attention.

 

Third parties may utilize US12NG’s intellectual property or technology, including the use of its business methods, trademarks and trading program software, without permission. The General Partner has a patent pending for US12NG’s business method and it is registering its trademarks. US12NG does not currently have any proprietary software. However, if it obtains proprietary software in the future, then any unauthorized use of US12NG’s proprietary software and other technology could also adversely affect its competitive advantage. US12NG may have difficulty monitoring unauthorized uses of its patents, trademarks, proprietary software and other technology. Also, third parties may independently develop business methods, trademarks or proprietary software and other technology similar to that of the General Partner or claim that the General Partner has violated their intellectual property rights, including their copyrights, trademark rights, trade names, trade secrets and patent rights. As a result, the General Partner may have to litigate in the future to protect its trade secrets, determine the validity and scope of other parties’ proprietary rights, defend itself against claims that it has infringed or otherwise violated other parties’ rights, or defend itself against claims that its rights are invalid. Any litigation of this type, even if the General Partner is successful and regardless of the merits, may result in significant costs, divert its resources from US12NG, or require it to change its proprietary software and other technology or enter into royalty or licensing agreements.

 

The success of US12NG depends on the ability of the General Partner to accurately implement trading systems, and any failure to do so could subject US12NG to losses on such transactions.

 

The General Partner uses mathematical formulas built into a generally available spreadsheet program to decide whether it should buy or sell Natural Gas Interests each day. Specifically, the General Partner uses the spreadsheet to make mathematical calculations and to monitor positions in Natural Gas Interests and Treasuries and correlations to the Benchmark Futures Contract. The General Partner must accurately process the spreadsheets’ outputs and execute the transactions called for by the formulas. In addition, US12NG relies on the General Partner to properly operate and maintain its computer and communications systems. Execution of the formulas and operation of the systems are subject to human error. Any failure, inaccuracy or delay in implementing any of the formulas or systems and executing US12NG’s transactions could impair its ability to achieve US12NG’s investment objective. It could also result in decisions to undertake transactions based on inaccurate or incomplete information. This could cause substantial losses on transactions.

 

US12NG may experience substantial losses on transactions if the computer or communications system fails.

 

US12NG’s trading activities, including its risk management, depend on the integrity and performance of the computer and communications systems supporting them. Extraordinary transaction volume, hardware or software failure, power or telecommunications failure, a natural disaster or other catastrophe could cause the computer systems to operate at an unacceptably slow speed or even fail. Any significant degradation or failure of the systems that the General Partner uses to gather and analyze information, enter orders, process data, monitor risk levels and otherwise engage in trading activities may result in substantial losses on transactions, liability to other parties, lost profit opportunities, damages to the General Partner’s and US12NG’s reputations, increased operational expenses and diversion of technical resources.

 

If the computer and communications systems are not upgraded, US12NG’s financial condition could be harmed.

 

The development of complex computer and communications systems and new technologies may render the existing computer and communications systems supporting US12NG’s trading activities obsolete. In addition, these computer and communications systems must be compatible with those of third parties, such as the systems of exchanges, clearing brokers and the executing brokers. As a result, if these third parties upgrade their systems, the General Partner will need to make corresponding upgrades to continue effectively its trading activities. US12NG’s future success will depend on US12NG’s ability to respond to changing technologies on a timely and cost-effective basis.

 

 

66

---

 

US12NG depends on the reliable performance of the computer and communications systems of third parties, such as brokers and futures exchanges, and may experience substantial losses on transactions if they fail.

 

US12NG depends on the proper and timely function of complex computer and communications systems maintained and operated by the futures exchanges, brokers and other data providers that the General Partner uses to conduct trading activities. Failure or inadequate performance of any of these systems could adversely affect the General Partner’s ability to complete transactions, including its ability to close out positions, and result in lost profit opportunities and significant losses on commodity interest transactions. This could have a material adverse effect on revenues and materially reduce US12NG’s available capital. For example, unavailability of price quotations from third parties may make it difficult or impossible for the General Partner to use its proprietary software that it relies upon to conduct its trading activities. Unavailability of records from brokerage firms may make it difficult or impossible for the General Partner to accurately determine which transactions have been executed or the details, including price and time, of any transaction executed. This unavailability of information also may make it difficult or impossible for the General Partner to reconcile its records of transactions with those of another party or to accomplish settlement of executed transactions.

 

The occurrence of a terrorist attack, or the outbreak, continuation or expansion of war or other hostilities could disrupt US12NG’s trading activity and materially affect US12NG’s profitability.

 

The operations of US12NG, the exchanges, brokers and counterparties with which US12NG does business, and the markets in which US12NG does business could be severely disrupted in the event of a major terrorist attack or the outbreak, continuation or expansion of war or other hostilities. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the war in Iraq, global anti-terrorism initiatives and political unrest in the Middle East and Southeast Asia continue to fuel this concern.

 

Risk of Leverage and Volatility

 

If the General Partner permits US12NG to become leveraged, investors could lose all or substantially all of their investment if US12NG’s trading positions suddenly turn unprofitable.

 

Commodity pools’ trading positions in futures contracts or other commodity interests are typically required to be secured by the deposit of margin funds that represent only a small percentage of a futures contract’s (or other commodity interests’) entire market value. This feature permits commodity pools to “leverage” their assets by purchasing or selling futures contracts (or other commodity interests) with an aggregate value in excess of the commodity pool’s assets. While this leverage can increase the pool’s profits, relatively small adverse movements in the price of the pool’s futures contracts can cause significant losses to the pool. While the General Partner has not and does not currently intend to leverage USN12G’s assets, it is not prohibited from doing so under the LP Agreement or otherwise.

 

The price of natural gas is volatile which could cause large fluctuations in the price of units.

 

Movements in the price of natural gas may be the result of factors outside of the General Partner’s control and may not be anticipated by the General Partner. Among the factors that can cause volatility in the price of natural gas are:

·

worldwide or regional demand for energy, which is affected by economic conditions;

·

the domestic and foreign supply and inventories of oil and gas;

·

weather conditions, including abnormally mild winter or summer weather, and abnormally harsh winter or summer weather;

·

availability and adequacy of pipeline and other transportation facilities;