o
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
o
|
Confidential,
for Use of The Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
o
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
x
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
x
|
No
fee required
|
|
o
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing
fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
(5)
|
Total
fee paid:
|
|
o
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
|
(4)
|
Date
Filed
|
·
|
THE
INTERESTS OF THE NANO GROUP’S SLATE OF DIRECTORS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE
ALIGNED WITH THOSE OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS. The slate they present is
hardly a
“blue ribbon” panel. Furthermore, Mr. Nano currently owns only
22
shares of CTT, and four of the other five proposed director nominees
do
not own any shares.
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano is a former President and CEO of CTT who was terminated by CTT
and is
currently in litigation with CTT. Among
other things, CTT believes that Mr. Nano misappropriated for his
own
benefit confidential CTT documents and CTT
monies.
|
·
|
The
Nano Group proxy
states that if the Nano Group were to prevail, Mr. Nano would get
his old
job back, drop CTT’s lawsuit against him and would immediately pay himself
at
least $2.5 million, including
alleged back salary, bonus and payment of substantial legal fees.
Is
this the real reason for this expensive proxy
contest?
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano’s thinly veiled attempt to use this proxy contest to resolve his
lawsuits with CTT for his own financial benefit is an insult to our
shareholders and a costly distraction to management at this critical
juncture. We believe that this is a flagrant attempt by Mr. Nano
to
circumvent his liabilities to CTT and we
do not think that paying Mr. Nano $2.5 million in cash is in our
shareholders’ best interests.
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano sold the majority of his shares during an 8-day period following
his
termination on June 14, 2005, and the stock price fell 20% from the
day
before he started selling, to the day after he finished.
During
that period, Mr. Nano sold more than 350,000 shares of CTT stock
worth
more than $2.3
million.
The volume was almost five times the average in the period immediately
prior to his trading.
We do not believe that this shows concern for our shareholders’
interests.
|
·
|
CTT’s
profitability during Mr. Nano’s tenure was the result of actions and
lawsuits initiated long before his arrival.
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano has made numerous inaccurate and often contradictory allegations
as
to the reasons for his termination. The truth is that Mr. Nano was
terminated in June 2005 because he had lost all credibility with
CTT’s
Board of Directors and management, in no small part because of his
inability to develop a coherent and credible long term strategic
plan to
build revenue, acquire new technologies and create shareholder value.
CTT
stands behind its reasons for termination and is fighting Mr. Nano’s
unfounded allegations and demands for
compensation.
|
·
|
The
Nano Group makes unfounded allegations of insider trading in its
proxy
statement. What they fail to mention is that your Audit Committee,
all of
whom were disinterested directors, undertook a full, impartial and
professional investigation and determined that no insider trading
occurred.
|
·
|
In
contrast to the allegations in the Nano Group proxy statement, CTT
believes that it compensates its employees fairly. Two individuals
did
send demand letters to CTT seeking additional commission payments
which
they claim are due to them based on
unauthorized oral promises made by Mr. Nano without consultation
with
CTT’s Compensation Committee. We
strongly believe that we have paid these employees what is due to
them.
|
·
|
Michael
Kiley, CTT’s former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer, resigned
in November 2006. Mr.
Nano hired Mr. Kiley and should have conducted a background check
at that
time, but apparently failed to do so. However,
to preserve the positive momentum driven by Mr. Kiley’s business
development efforts, CTT decided to retain him as an independent
consultant.
|
·
|
CTT’s
President and CEO, Dr. D.J. Freed, possesses over 30 years experience
in
global technology marketing and helping companies grow through technology
commercialization. Supporting Dr. Freed is a focused and energetic
management team that has recruited a talented group of business
professionals with the knowledge and hands on experience to execute
our
growth plans. Over
the past 18 months, CTT’s management team has created an infrastructure
for growth.
|
·
|
As
we have consistently reported to you during the past year, this will
take
time and effort, but CTT’s pipeline of technologies is starting to fill,
and we are encouraged by this progress. When
Dr. Freed became President and CEO there were approximately a half
dozen
commercially viable technologies in the pipeline - since then CTT
has
evaluated several thousand technologies and now has available several
times more technologies that we believe are commercially viable and
ready
for licensing.
|
·
|
We
believe that CTT is taking the appropriate steps to achieve sustainable
growth and profitability and, in turn, increase shareholder
value.
|
Richard
E. Carver
|
Maria
Maccecchini, Ph.D.
|
George
W. Dunbar, Jr.
|
Charles
J. Philippin
|
D.J.
Freed, Ph.D.
|
John.
M. Sabin
|
COMPANY
CONTACT:
|
Jennifer
Carberry, Director of Marketing
|
203-368-6044
|
|
jcarberry@competitivetech.net
|
|
www.competitivetech.net
|
·
|
THE
INTERESTS OF THE NANO GROUP’S SLATE OF DIRECTORS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE
ALIGNED WITH THOSE OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS. The slate they present is
hardly a
“blue ribbon” panel. Furthermore, Mr. Nano currently owns only
22
shares of CTT, and four of the other five proposed director nominees
do
not own any shares.
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano is a former President and CEO of CTT who was terminated by CTT
and is
currently in litigation with CTT. Among
other things, CTT believes that Mr. Nano misappropriated for his
own
benefit confidential CTT documents and CTT
monies.
|
·
|
The
Nano Group proxy
states that if the Nano Group were to prevail, Mr. Nano would get
his old
job back, drop CTT’s lawsuit against him and would immediately pay himself
at
least $2.5 million, including
alleged back salary, bonus and payment of substantial legal fees.
Is
this the real reason for this expensive proxy
contest?
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano’s thinly veiled attempt to use this proxy contest to resolve his
lawsuits with CTT for his own financial benefit is an insult to our
shareholders and a costly distraction to management at this critical
juncture. We believe that this is a flagrant attempt by Mr. Nano
to
circumvent his liabilities to CTT and we
do not think that paying Mr. Nano $2.5 million in cash is in our
shareholders’ best interests.
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano sold the majority of his shares during an 8-day period following
his
termination on June 14, 2005, and the stock price fell 20% from the
day
before he started selling, to the day after he finished.
During
that period, Mr. Nano sold more than 350,000 shares of CTT stock
worth
more than $2.3
million.
The volume was almost five times the average in the period immediately
prior to his trading.
We do not believe that this shows concern for our shareholders’
interests.
|
·
|
CTT’s
profitability during Mr. Nano’s tenure was the result of actions and
lawsuits initiated long before his arrival.
|
·
|
Mr.
Nano has made numerous inaccurate and often contradictory allegations
as
to the reasons for his termination. The truth is that Mr. Nano was
terminated in June 2005 because he had lost all credibility with
CTT’s
Board of Directors and management, in no small part because of his
inability to develop a coherent and credible long term strategic
plan to
build revenue, acquire new technologies and create shareholder value.
CTT
stands behind its reasons for termination and is fighting Mr. Nano’s
unfounded allegations and demands for
compensation.
|
·
|
The
Nano Group makes unfounded allegations of insider trading in its
proxy
statement. What they fail to mention is that your Audit Committee,
all of
whom were disinterested directors, undertook a full, impartial and
professional investigation and determined that no insider trading
occurred.
|
·
|
In
contrast to the allegations in the Nano Group proxy statement, CTT
believes that it compensates its employees fairly. Two individuals
did
send demand letters to CTT seeking additional commission payments
which
they claim are due to them based on
unauthorized oral promises made by Mr. Nano without consultation
with
CTT’s Compensation Committee. We
strongly believe that we have paid these employees what is due to
them.
|
·
|
Michael
Kiley, CTT’s former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer, resigned
in November 2006. Mr.
Nano hired Mr. Kiley and should have conducted a background check
at that
time, but apparently failed to do so. However,
to preserve the positive momentum driven by Mr. Kiley’s business
development efforts, CTT decided to retain him as an independent
consultant.
|
·
|
CTT’s
President and CEO, Dr. D.J. Freed, possesses over 30 years experience
in
global technology marketing and helping companies grow through technology
commercialization. Supporting Dr. Freed is a focused and energetic
management team that has recruited a talented group of business
professionals with the knowledge and hands on experience to execute
our
growth plans. Over
the past 18 months, CTT’s management team has created an infrastructure
for growth.
|
·
|
As
we have consistently reported to you during the past year, this will
take
time and effort, but CTT’s pipeline of technologies is starting to fill,
and we are encouraged by this progress. When
Dr. Freed became President and CEO there were approximately a half
dozen
commercially viable technologies in the pipeline - since then CTT
has
evaluated several thousand technologies and now has available several
times more technologies that we believe are commercially viable and
ready
for licensing.
|
·
|
We
believe that CTT is taking the appropriate steps to achieve sustainable
growth and profitability and, in turn, increase shareholder
value.
|
Richard
E. Carver
|
Maria
Maccecchini, Ph.D.
|
George
W. Dunbar, Jr.
|
Charles
J. Philippin
|
D.J.
Freed, Ph.D.
|
John.
M. Sabin
|