UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-Q
QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY
Investment Company Act file number |
811-7362 |
|
||||
|
||||||
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc. |
||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
||||||
|
||||||
55 Water Street, New York, NY |
|
10041 |
||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
||||
|
||||||
Robert I. Frenkel, Esq. |
||||||
(Name and address of agent for service) |
||||||
|
||||||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
1-800-451-2010 |
|
||||
|
||||||
Date of fiscal year end: |
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Date of reporting period: |
September 30, 2008 |
|
||||
ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
WESTERN ASSET MUNICIPAL PARTNERS FUND INC.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
September 30, 2008
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amount |
|
|
|
Security |
|
Value |
|
||
MUNICIPAL BONDS 98.9% |
|
|
|
||||||
Arizona 1.3% |
|
|
|
||||||
$ |
2,855,000 |
|
|
|
Glendale, AZ, Transportation Excise Tax Revenue, MBIA, 5.000% due 7/1/28 |
|
$ |
2,683,129 |
|
California 8.2% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
California EFA Revenue, College & University Financing Program, 5.000% due 2/1/26 |
|
850,590 |
|
||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Finance Authority Revenue, Catholic Healthcare West, 5.625% due 7/1/32 |
|
4,527,100 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
California Housing Finance Agency Revenue, Home Mortgage, 4.800% due 8/1/37 (a) |
|
1,536,180 |
|
||
35,000 |
|
|
|
California State, GO, Unrefunded Balance, 5.125% due 6/1/24 |
|
34,061 |
|
||
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
California Statewide CDA Revenue, Insured Health Facility L.A., Jewish Home, CA Mortgage Insurance, 5.000% due 11/15/28 |
|
1,288,185 |
|
||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA, Department of Water & Power Revenue, Power Systems, Subordinated, FSA, 5.000% due 7/1/35 |
|
4,585,650 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Southern California Public Power Authority, Project Number 1, 5.250% due 11/1/26 |
|
1,640,980 |
|
||
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
Turlock, CA, Public Financing Authority, Tax Allocation Revenue, FSA, 5.000% due 9/1/30 |
|
2,270,850 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total California |
|
16,733,596 |
|
||
Colorado 5.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Revenue: |
|
|
|
||
2,850,000 |
|
|
|
Poudre Valley Health Care, 5.000% due 3/1/25 |
|
2,498,082 |
|
||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Refunding Adventist Health, Sunbelt, 5.250% due 11/15/35 (b) |
|
4,255,800 |
|
||
495,000 |
|
|
|
Colorado Springs, CO, Hospital Revenue, 6.375% due 12/15/30 (c)(d) |
|
537,798 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Public Authority for Colorado Energy, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue: |
|
|
|
||
500,000 |
|
|
|
5.750% due 11/15/18 |
|
455,015 |
|
||
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.500% due 11/15/38 |
|
3,442,400 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Colorado |
|
11,189,095 |
|
||
District of Columbia 2.0% |
|
|
|
||||||
4,600,000 |
|
|
|
District of Columbia, Hospital Revenue, Childrens Hospital Obligation Group, FSA, 5.250% due 7/15/45 |
|
4,102,326 |
|
||
Florida 4.3% |
|
|
|
||||||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Florida State Department of Environmental Protection, Preservation Revenue, Florida Forever, AMBAC, 5.000% due 7/1/21 |
|
1,975,740 |
|
||
4,950,000 |
|
|
|
Florida State Department of Transportation, Turnpike Revenue, FSA, 4.500% due 7/1/34 |
|
4,125,082 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Aviation Revenue, Miami International Airport, FSA, 5.000% due 10/1/41 |
|
1,781,900 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
Seminole Tribe Florida Special Obligation Revenue,
5.250% due |
|
860,840 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Florida |
|
8,743,562 |
|
||
Hawaii 1.0% |
|
|
|
||||||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Hawaii State Airport System Revenue, FGIC, 6.000% due 7/1/19 (a) |
|
1,964,120 |
|
||
Illinois 13.1% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Chicago, IL, Midway Airport Revenue, MBIA: |
|
|
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.500% due 1/1/29 |
|
2,013,900 |
|
||
3,750,000 |
|
|
|
5.625% due 1/1/29 (a) |
|
3,486,525 |
|
||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Chicago, IL, Park District, GO, Refunding, FGIC, 5.000% due 1/1/29 |
|
4,683,000 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
Chicago, IL, Public Building Commission, Building Revenue, Chicago School Reform, FGIC, 5.250% due 12/1/18 |
|
1,023,660 |
|
||
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
Cook County, IL, Community College District No. 524 Moraine Valley, GO, MBIA, 5.000% due 12/1/25 |
|
1,446,315 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Illinois EFA Revenue, Northwestern University, 5.500% due 12/1/13 |
|
2,160,380 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Illinois Health Facilities Authority Revenue: |
|
|
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
1
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued)
September 30, 2008
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amount |
|
|
|
Security |
|
Value |
|
||
Illinois 13.1% (continued) |
|
|
|
||||||
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
Refunding, Lutheran General Health System, 7.000% due 4/1/14 |
|
$ |
1,664,925 |
|
1,850,000 |
|
|
|
Refunding, SSM Health Care, MBIA, 6.550% due 6/1/13 (f) |
|
2,103,413 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Servantoor Project, FSA, 6.000% due 8/15/12 (f) |
|
2,136,800 |
|
||
605,000 |
|
|
|
South Suburban Hospital Project, 7.000% due 2/15/18 (f) |
|
699,174 |
|
||
4,145,000 |
|
|
|
Illinois Municipal Electric Agency Power Supply, FGIC, 5.250% due 2/1/28 |
|
3,812,405 |
|
||
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
Illinois State, GO, First Series, FSA, 5.500% due 5/1/16 |
|
1,634,535 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Illinois |
|
26,865,032 |
|
||
Indiana 3.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Indiana Bond Bank Revenue: |
|
|
|
||
1,285,000 |
|
|
|
5.000% due 8/1/23 |
|
1,278,254 |
|
||
715,000 |
|
|
|
5.000% due 8/1/23 (c) |
|
751,708 |
|
||
2,390,000 |
|
|
|
Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue, Community Hospital Project, AMBAC, 5.000% due 5/1/35 |
|
2,046,772 |
|
||
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
Indiana State DFA Environment Improvement Revenue, USX Corp. Project, 5.250% due 12/1/22 |
|
3,040,590 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Indiana |
|
7,117,324 |
|
||
Iowa 0.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Hospital Facility Revenue,
6.750% due |
|
1,066,100 |
|
||
Kansas 0.7% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,430,000 |
|
|
|
Kansas State Development Finance Authority, Health Facilities Revenue, Sisters of Charity, 6.250% due 12/1/28 |
|
1,470,512 |
|
||
Maryland 6.0% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Maryland State Health & Higher EFA Revenue: |
|
|
|
||
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
Carroll County General Hospital, 6.000% due 7/1/37 |
|
2,923,530 |
|
||
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
Suburban Hospital, 5.500% due 7/1/16 |
|
2,586,750 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
University of Maryland Medical Systems: |
|
|
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.750% due 7/1/30 (c) |
|
1,080,020 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.000% due 7/1/32 (c)(d) |
|
1,092,470 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Revenue, AMBAC: |
|
|
|
||
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
5.500% due 4/1/15 (a) |
|
2,550,750 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.500% due 4/1/16 (a) |
|
2,025,360 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Maryland |
|
12,258,880 |
|
||
Massachusetts 5.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority Education Loan Revenue, 6.125% due 1/1/22 (a) |
|
935,650 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts State HEFA Revenue, Partners Health: |
|
|
|
||
2,405,000 |
|
|
|
5.750% due 7/1/32 (c) |
|
2,604,687 |
|
||
95,000 |
|
|
|
5.750% due 7/1/32 |
|
96,911 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts State Water Pollution Abatement Trust Revenue, MWRA Program: |
|
|
|
||
4,665,000 |
|
|
|
5.750% due 8/1/29 |
|
4,711,230 |
|
||
1,155,000 |
|
|
|
5.750% due 8/1/29 (c) |
|
1,199,271 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts State Water Resources Authority: |
|
|
|
||
800,000 |
|
|
|
FSA, 5.250% due 8/1/32 |
|
793,488 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
MBIA, 5.000% due 8/1/34 |
|
941,900 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Massachusetts |
|
11,283,137 |
|
||
Michigan 2.3% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Michigan State, Hospital Finance Authority Revenue: |
|
|
|
||
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
Refunding, Sparrow Hospital Obligated, 5.000% due 11/15/36 |
|
2,017,400 |
|
||
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
Trinity Health, 5.375% due 12/1/30 |
|
2,698,560 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Michigan |
|
4,715,960 |
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
2
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued)
September 30, 2008
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amount |
|
|
|
Security |
|
Value |
|
||
Missouri 2.1% |
|
|
|
||||||
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Boone County, MO, Hospital Revenue, Boone Hospital Center, 5.375% due 8/1/38 |
|
$ |
1,731,440 |
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
Missouri State Highways & Transit Commission, State Road Revenue, Second Lien, 5.250% due 5/1/20 |
|
2,597,850 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Missouri |
|
4,329,290 |
|
||
New Hampshire 0.0% |
|
|
|
||||||
65,000 |
|
|
|
New Hampshire State HFA, Single-Family Residential Revenue, 6.800% due 7/1/15 (a) |
|
65,068 |
|
||
New Jersey 6.9% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA: |
|
|
|
||
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
Motor Vehicle Surcharges Revenue, MBIA, 5.250% due 7/1/16 |
|
2,591,250 |
|
||
5,150,000 |
|
|
|
PCR, Revenue, Public Service Electric and Gas Co. Project, MBIA, 6.400% due 5/1/32 (a) |
|
5,075,737 |
|
||
5,450,000 |
|
|
|
Water Facilities Revenue, New Jersey American Water Co. Inc. Project, FGIC, 6.875% due 11/1/34 (a) |
|
5,458,066 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority Revenue, Hackensack University Medical Center, 6.000% due 1/1/25 |
|
1,010,320 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total New Jersey |
|
14,135,373 |
|
||
New York 10.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
500,000 |
|
|
|
Nassau County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Revenue, Continuing Care Retirement, Amsterdam at Harborside, 6.700% due 1/1/43 |
|
471,235 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
New York City, NY: |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
GO: |
|
|
|
||
1,980,000 |
|
|
|
6.000% due 5/15/30 (c) |
|
2,110,700 |
|
||
20,000 |
|
|
|
6.000% due 5/15/30 |
|
20,192 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer Systems Revenue, 5.125% due 6/15/31 |
|
961,660 |
|
||
5,115,000 |
|
|
|
TFA Revenue, Unrefunded Balance, Future Tax Secured, 5.500% due 11/15/17 |
|
5,381,491 |
|
||
3,365,000 |
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue, Court Facilities Lease, NYC Issue, Non State Supported Debt, AMBAC, 5.500% due 5/15/30 |
|
3,298,104 |
|
||
4,700,000 |
|
|
|
New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, AMBAC, 5.000% due 4/1/26 |
|
4,519,755 |
|
||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
New York State Urban Development Corp. Revenue, State Personal Income Tax, 5.000% due 3/15/26 |
|
4,808,400 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total New York |
|
21,571,537 |
|
||
North Carolina 0.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission Health Care Facilities Revenue, Novant Health Obligation Group, 5.000% due 11/1/39 |
|
1,014,096 |
|
||
Oregon 0.6% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
Multnomah County, OR, Hospital Facilities Authority Revenue, Providence Health Systems, 5.250% due 10/1/18 |
|
1,278,350 |
|
||
Pennsylvania 2.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia, PA: |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Gas Works Revenue, 7th General Ordinance: |
|
|
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.000% due 10/1/23 |
|
1,826,860 |
|
||
2,685,000 |
|
|
|
AMBAC, 5.000% due 10/1/17 |
|
2,805,637 |
|
||
500,000 |
|
|
|
School District, GO, FSA, 5.500% due 2/1/31 (c) |
|
538,135 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Pennsylvania |
|
5,170,632 |
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
3
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued)
September 30, 2008
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amount |
|
|
|
Security |
|
Value |
|
||
Tennessee 2.2% |
|
|
|
||||||
$ |
4,700,000 |
|
|
|
Memphis-Shelby County, TN, Airport Authority Revenue, AMBAC, 6.000% due 3/1/24 (a) |
|
$ |
4,530,565 |
|
Texas 13.8% |
|
|
|
||||||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Aledo, TX, GO, ISD, School Building, PSF, 5.000% due 2/15/30 |
|
4,687,700 |
|
||
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
Beaumont, TX, ISD, GO, School Building, PSF, 5.000% due 2/15/33 |
|
1,033,604 |
|
||
250,000 |
|
|
|
Brazos River Authority Texas PCR, TXU Co., 8.250% due 5/1/33 (a)(e) |
|
234,330 |
|
||
4,750,000 |
|
|
|
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, Brazoria County Environmental, Dow Chemical Co. Project, 5.950% due 5/15/33 (a) |
|
4,035,363 |
|
||
3,125,000 |
|
|
|
Cypress-Fairbanks, TX, ISD, GO, School House, PSF, 5.000% due 2/15/30 |
|
2,959,875 |
|
||
2,960,000 |
|
|
|
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Revenue, Memorial Hermann Healthcare Systems, 5.250% due 12/1/18 |
|
2,962,871 |
|
||
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
Houston, TX, Utility System Revenue, Refunding, Combined First Lien, FSA, 5.250% due 5/15/20 |
|
3,030,300 |
|
||
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
Mesquite, TX, ISD No. 1, GO, Capital Appreciation, PSFG, zero coupon bond to yield 5.169% due 8/15/27 |
|
316,170 |
|
||
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority Revenue, 5.750% due 1/1/40 |
|
2,275,050 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue, Refunding, Texas Health Resources, 5.000% due 2/15/21 |
|
1,912,920 |
|
||
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Texas State Turnpike Authority Revenue, First Tier, AMBAC, 5.500% due 8/15/39 |
|
4,744,100 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Texas |
|
28,192,283 |
|
||
Virginia 1.5% |
|
|
|
||||||
2,915,000 |
|
|
|
Greater Richmond, VA, Convention Center Authority, Hotel Tax Revenue, Convention Center Expansion Project, 6.125% due 6/15/20 (c) |
|
3,109,022 |
|
||
Washington 4.4% |
|
|
|
||||||
2,900,000 |
|
|
|
Chelan County, WA, Public Utility District, Chelan Hydro System No.1, Construction Revenue, AMBAC, 5.450% due 7/1/37 (a) |
|
2,503,715 |
|
||
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Port of Seattle, WA, Revenue, Refunding, Intermediate Lien, MBIA, 5.000% due 3/1/30 |
|
1,732,200 |
|
||
4,650,000 |
|
|
|
Seattle, WA, GO, FSA, 5.750% due 12/1/28 (c) |
|
4,880,640 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Total Washington |
|
9,116,555 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS BEFORE
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
|
202,705,544 |
|
||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS 1.1% |
|
|
|
||||||
Alabama 0.8% |
|
|
|
||||||
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
Southeast Alabama Gas District, Alabama Revenue, SPA-Societe Generale, 4.500%, 10/1/08 (g) |
|
1,700,000 |
|
||
Massachusetts 0.2% |
|
|
|
||||||
300,000 |
|
|
|
Massachusetts State, GO, Consolidated Loan, SPA-Bank of America, 4.400%, 10/1/08 (g) |
|
300,000 |
|
||
Pennsylvania 0.1% |
|
|
|
||||||
300,000 |
|
|
|
Luzerne County, PA, GO, Notes, FSA, SPA-JPMorgan Chase, 8.300%, 10/2/08 (g) |
|
300,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHORT-TERM
INVESTMENTS |
|
2,300,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100.0% (Cost $216,424,771#) |
|
$ |
205,005,544 |
|
|
(a) |
Income from this issue is considered a preference item for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax (AMT). |
(b) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate disclosed is that which is in effect at September 30, 2008. |
(c) |
Pre-Refunded bonds are escrowed with U.S. government obligations and/or U.S. government agency securities and are considered by the manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings. |
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
4
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued) |
September 30, 2008 |
(d) |
All or a portion of this security is held at the broker as collateral for open futures contracts. |
||
(e) |
Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be resold in transactions that are exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. This security has been deemed liquid pursuant to guidelines approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise noted. |
||
(f) |
Bonds are escrowed to maturity by government securities and/or U.S. government agency securities and are considered by the manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings. |
||
(g) |
Variable rate demand obligations have a demand feature under which the Fund can tender them back to the issuer on no more than 7 days notice. Date shown is the date of the next interest rate change. |
||
# |
Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is substantially the same. |
||
|
|
||
|
Abbreviations used in this schedule: |
||
|
- |
Ambac Assurance Corporation - Insured Bonds |
|
|
CDA |
- |
Community Development Authority |
|
DFA |
- |
Development Finance Agency |
|
EDA |
- |
Economic Development Authority |
|
EFA |
- |
Educational Facilities Authority |
|
FGIC |
- |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company - Insured Bonds |
|
FSA |
- |
Financial Security Assurance - Insured Bonds |
|
GO |
- |
General Obligation |
|
HEFA |
- |
Health & Educational Facilities Authority |
|
HFA |
- |
Housing Finance Authority |
|
ISD |
- |
Independent School District |
|
MBIA |
- |
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation - Insured Bonds |
|
MWRA |
- |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority |
|
PCR |
- |
Pollution Control Revenue |
|
PSF |
- |
Permanent School Fund |
|
PSFG |
- |
Permanent School Fund Guaranty |
|
SPA |
- |
Standby Bond Purchase Agreement - Insured Bonds |
|
TFA |
- |
Transitional Finance Authority |
Summary of Investments by Industry *
Hospitals |
|
20.7 |
% |
Transportation |
|
14.3 |
|
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity |
|
11.7 |
|
Water & Sewer |
|
10.2 |
|
Special Tax |
|
9.6 |
|
Industrial Development |
|
9.3 |
|
Local General Obligation |
|
7.4 |
|
Electric |
|
7.2 |
|
Education |
|
2.3 |
|
Leasing |
|
2.1 |
|
Other Revenue |
|
1.5 |
|
Resource Recovery |
|
1.0 |
|
Utilities |
|
0.8 |
|
State General Obligation |
|
0.8 |
|
Housing |
|
0.8 |
|
General Obligation |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
*As a percentage of total investments. Please note that Fund holdings are as of September 30, 2008 and are subject to change.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
5
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (unaudited)(continued) |
September 30, 2008 |
Ratings Table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P/Moody |
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
35.0 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
34.8 |
|
A |
|
21.2 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
5.0 |
|
CCC/Caa |
|
0.1 |
|
A-1/VMIG1 |
|
1.0 |
|
NR |
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
As a percentage of total investments.
S&P primary rating; Moodys secondary.
See pages 7 and 8 for definitions of ratings.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
6
Bond Ratings (unaudited)
The definitions of the applicable rating symbols are set forth below:
Standard & Poors Ratings Service (Standard & Poors)Ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.
AAA |
|
Bonds rated AAA have the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poors. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong. |
AA |
|
Bonds rated AA have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differ from the highest rated issues only in a small degree. |
A |
|
Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher rated categories. |
BBB |
|
Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for bonds in this category than in higher rated categories. |
BB, B, |
|
Bonds rated BB, B, CCC, CC and C are regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. BB represents the lowest degree of speculation and C the highest degree of speculation. While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. |
D |
|
Bonds rated D are in default and payment of interest and/or repayment of principal is in arrears. |
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys)Numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 may be applied to each generic rating from Aa to Caa, where 1 is the highest and 3 the lowest ranking within its generic category.
Aaa |
|
Bonds rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as gilt edge. Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes can be visualized as most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues. |
Aa |
|
Bonds rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa securities. |
A |
|
Bonds rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper medium grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment some time in the future. |
Baa |
|
Bonds rated Baa are considered as medium grade obligations, i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well. |
Ba |
|
Bonds rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and therefore |
7
Bond Ratings (unaudited)(continued)
|
|
not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this class. |
B |
|
Bonds rated B generally lack characteristics of desirable investments. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small. |
Caa |
|
Bonds rated Caa are of poor standing. These may be in default, or present elements of danger may exist with respect to principal or interest. |
Ca |
|
Bonds rated Ca represent obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked short-comings. |
C |
|
Bonds rated C are the lowest class of bonds and issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing. |
|
|
|
Fitch Ratings Service (Fitch)Ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to |
||
|
|
show relative standings within the major rating categories. |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
Bonds rated AAA have the highest rating assigned by Fitch. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong. |
AA |
|
Bonds rated AA have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differ from the highest rated issues only in a small degree. |
A |
|
Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher rated categories. |
BBB |
|
Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for bonds in this category than in higher rated categories. |
BB, B, |
|
Bonds rated BB, B, CCC and CC are regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. BB represents a lower degree of speculation than B, and CC the highest degree of speculation. While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. |
NR |
|
Indicates that the bond is not rated by Standard & Poors, Moodys or Fitch. |
Short-Term Security Ratings (unaudited)
SP-1 |
|
Standard & Poors highest rating indicating very strong or strong capacity to pay principal and interest; those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus (+) sign. |
A-1 |
|
Standard & Poors highest commercial paper and variable-rate demand obligation (VRDO) rating indicating that the degree of safety regarding timely payment is either overwhelming or very strong; those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus (+) sign. |
VMIG 1 |
|
Moodys highest rating for issues having a demand feature VRDO. |
MIG1 |
|
Moodys highest rating for short-term municipal obligations. |
P-1 |
|
Moodys highest rating for commercial paper and for VRDO prior to the advent of the VMIG 1 rating. |
F1 |
|
Fitchs highest rating indicating the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; those issues determined to possess overwhelming strong credit feature are denoted with a plus (+) sign. |
8
Notes to Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc. (the Fund) was incorporated in Maryland on November 24, 1992 and is registered as a diversified, closed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Board of Directors authorized 100 million shares of $0.001 par value common stock. The Funds primary investment objective is to seek a high level of current income which is exempt from federal income taxes, consistent with the preservation of capital. As a secondary investment objective, the Fund intends to enhance portfolio value by purchasing tax exempt securities that, in the opinion of the investment manager may appreciate in value relative to other similar obligations in the marketplace.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
(a) Financial Futures Contracts. The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts typically to hedge a portion of the portfolio. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit cash or securities as initial margin, equal in value to a certain percentage of the contract amount (initial margin deposit). Additional securities are also segregated up to the current market value of the financial futures contracts. Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying financial instruments. When the financial futures contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recognized equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transactions and the Funds basis in the contracts.
The risks associated with entering into financial futures contracts include the possibility that a change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying financial instruments. In addition, investing in financial futures contracts involves the risk that the Fund could lose more than the initial margin deposit and subsequent payments required for a futures transaction. Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
(b) Security Transactions. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis.
2. Investment Valuation
Effective January 1, 2008, the Fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157). FAS 157 establishes a single definition of fair value, creates a three-tier hierarchy as a framework for measuring fair value based on inputs used to value the Funds investments, and requires additional disclosure about fair value. The hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
· |
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
· |
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
· |
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Securities are valued based on transactions in municipal obligations, quotations from municipal bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various other relationships between securities. When prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect fair value, the Fund may value these securities at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors. Short-term obligations with maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
9
Notes to Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued)
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Funds assets carried at fair value:
|
|
September 30, |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|||
Investments in Securities |
|
$ |
205,005,544 |
|
|
|
$ |
205,005,544 |
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Instruments* |
|
(159,875 |
) |
$ |
(159,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
204,845,669 |
|
$ |
(159,875 |
) |
$ |
205,005,544 |
|
|
|
* Other financial instruments includes futures contracts.
3. Investments
At September 30, 2008, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes were substantially as follows:
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
2,909,387 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
(14,328,614 |
) |
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
$ |
(11,419,227 |
) |
At September 30, 2008, the Fund had the following open futures contract:
Contracts to Sell |
|
Number of |
|
Expiration |
|
Basis |
|
Market |
|
Unrealized |
|
|||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
|
100 |
|
12/08 |
|
$ |
11,557,313 |
|
$ |
11,717,188 |
|
$ |
(159,875 |
) |
4. Recent accounting pronouncement
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161). FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about the Funds derivative and hedging activities, including how such activities are accounted for and their effect on the Funds financial position, performance and cash flows. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FAS 161 will have on the Funds financial statements and related disclosures.
10
ITEM 2. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrants last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 3. EXHIBITS.
Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are attached hereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund Inc.
By |
/s/ R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
||
R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
|||
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
Date: November 25, 2008 |
|
|
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By |
/s/ R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Kaprel Ozsolak |
|
|
Kaprel Ozsolak |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2008 |
|
|