UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED
SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number |
811-09153 |
||||||
|
|||||||
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust |
|||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
|||||||
|
|||||||
The Eaton Vance Building, 255 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts |
|
02109 |
|||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
|||||
|
|||||||
Maureen A. Gemma The Eaton Vance Building, 255 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|||||||
(Name and address of agent for service) |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
(617) 482-8260 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Date of fiscal year end: |
November 30 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Date of reporting period: |
May 31, 2008 |
|
|||||
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Semiannual Report May 31, 2008
EATON VANCE
MUNICIPAL
INCOME
TRUSTS
CLOSED-END FUNDS:
California
Florida Plus
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Jersey
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy ("Privacy Policy") with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.
None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer's account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers.
Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.
We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy only applies to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer's account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser's privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance's Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called "householding" and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio (if applicable) will file a schedule of its portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds' and Portfolios' Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Investment Update |
2 |
|
|
Performance Information and Portfolio Composition |
|
|
|
California Municipal Income Trust |
4 |
Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust |
5 |
Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust |
6 |
Michigan Municipal Income Trust |
7 |
New Jersey Municipal Income Trust |
8 |
New York Municipal Income Trust |
9 |
Ohio Municipal Income Trust |
10 |
Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust |
11 |
|
|
Financial Statements |
12 |
|
|
Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
71 |
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
72 |
|
|
Board of Trustees Annual Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreements |
74 |
|
|
Officers and Trustees |
77 |
1
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
INVESTMENT UPDATE
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts (the Trusts) are closed-end Trusts, traded on the American Stock Exchange, which are designed to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and state personal income taxes, as applicable. This income is earned by investing primarily in investment-grade municipal securities.
Economic and Market Conditions
Economic growth in the first quarter of 2008 measured 0.9%, according to Commerce Department data reported in May 2008, following the 0.6% growth rate achieved in the fourth quarter 2007. The housing sector continued to struggle in the first quarter due to market concerns related to subprime mortgages. Although the weaker dollar was having a beneficial effect on export-related industries, tourism, and U.S. based multinational companies, consumers started to curtail spending as food and energy costs continued to climb, according to the U.S. Commerce Department, and consumer confidence levels fell to 25-year lows, according to University of Michigan data.
On March 16, 2008, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) took extraordinary actions to support orderly market functioning after it learned that Bear Stearns faced a liquidity crisis which could have triggered a wider market crisis. In addition to approving a financing arrangement to support JPMorgan Chases acquisition of Bear Stearns, the Fed created a new lending facility that expanded the potential collateral it would accept from member banks and extended the new lending facility to securities firms. Through May 31, 2008, the Federal Funds Rate has been lowered by a total of 325 basis points (3.25%) since September 18, 2007, to 2.00% from 5.25%, and the Discount Rate, the rate at which the Fed lends to banks and securities firms, has been lowered by a total of 400 basis points (4.00%) since August 17, 2007, to 2.25% from 6.25%. Management believes that the Feds actions have been aimed at providing market liquidity during the period of extreme uncertainty and tight credit conditions that first surfaced in August 2007.
Management Discussion
The Trusts invest primarily in bonds with stated maturities of 10 years or longer, as longer-maturity bonds historically have provided greater tax-exempt income for investors than shorter-maturity bonds.
Relative to their benchmark, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index a broad-based, unmanaged index of municipal bonds the Trusts underperformed at net asset value (NAV) for the six months ended May 31, 2008.(1) Management believes that much of the underperformance at NAV can be attributed to the broader-based credit crisis that has shaken the fixed-income markets since August 2007, which led investors to move their capital into the Treasury market, particularly in shorter-maturity bonds. This move was originally driven by uncertainty surrounding financial companies exposure to mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). More recently, the municipal bond market has been impacted by the downgrade of major municipal bond insurers due to their exposure to mortgage-related CDO debt. As a result of an active management style that focuses on income and longer call protection, the Trusts generally hold longer-duration bonds. Although the municipal bond market stabilized and the Trusts performances improved from March 2008 through May 2008, management believes that investors flight to shorter- maturity uninsured bonds from longer-maturity insured bonds, which took place from September 2007 through February 2008, resulted in the Trusts relative underperformance at NAV for the period.
The ratio of yields on current coupon AAA-rated insured bonds to the yield on 30-year Treasury bonds was 98.2% as of May 31, 2008, with many individual bonds trading higher than 98.2%.(2) Management believes that this was the result of dislocation in the fixed-income marketplace caused by fears of subprime contagion, insurance companies mark-to-market risks and the decentralized nature of the municipal marketplace. Historically, this is a rare occurrence in the
(1) |
It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
|
|
(2) |
Source: Bloomberg L.P. Yields are a compilation of a representative variety of general obligations and are not necessarily representative of a Trusts yield. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Trusts current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Trust shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
2
municipal bond market and is generally considered a signal that municipal bonds are significantly undervalued compared to Treasuries.
With this backdrop, management continues to manage all of its municipal funds and trusts with the same relative value approach that it has traditionally employed maintaining a long-term perspective when markets exhibit extreme short-term volatility. We believe this approach has provided excellent long-term benefits to our investors over time.
A Note Regarding Auction Preferred Shares (APS)
As has been widely reported since mid-February 2008, the normal functioning of the auction market in the United States for certain types of auction rate securities has been disrupted by an imbalance between buy and sell orders. Consistent with patterns in the broader market for auction rate securities, the Trusts have, since mid-February, experienced unsuccessful APS auctions. In the event of an unsuccessful auction, the affected APS remain outstanding, and the dividend rate reverts to the specified maximum payable rate.
On June 23, 2008, after the end of the reporting period, management announced that it had secured new financing that the Trusts intend to use to redeem a portion of their outstanding APS, subject to satisfying the notice and other requirements that apply to APS redemptions. Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust plan to redeem approximately 6%, 36%, 7%, 3% and 15%, respectively, of their outstanding APS on or after July 7, 2008. Management is working diligently to provide liquidity solutions that will enable the Trusts to redeem their remaining outstanding APS. It is not certain when, or if, the Trusts remaining outstanding APS will be redeemed.
3
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
CEV |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
7.10 |
% |
One Year |
|
-7.17 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.89 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-1.60 |
% |
One Year |
|
-4.18 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.83 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.60 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.86 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
8.24 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-0.57 |
% |
One Year |
|
-0.40 |
|
Five Years |
|
4.33 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.93 |
|
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
49.6 |
% |
AA |
|
6.4 |
% |
A |
|
28.8 |
% |
BBB |
|
6.0 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
9.2 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
98 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
22.7 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
14.4 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
7.9 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$89.42 |
· |
Leverage:** |
36.2% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 41.05% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 24, 24, 24 and 13 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
|
Effective June 19, 2008, the name of Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust was changed to Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust. |
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
FEV |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
-8.12 |
|
Five Years |
|
1.25 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-2.23 |
% |
One Year |
|
-4.61 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.39 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.29 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
5.06 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
7.78 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper Florida Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-0.89 |
% |
One Year |
|
-0.70 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.59 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.68 |
|
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
53.3 |
% |
AA |
|
11.6 |
% |
A |
|
9.4 |
% |
BBB |
|
7.0 |
% |
BB |
|
1.0 |
% |
B |
|
2.4 |
% |
CCC |
|
1.3 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
14.0 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
96 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
26.8 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
17.3 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
8.6 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$91.81 |
· |
Leverage:** |
37.2% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 35.00% federal income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Florida Municipal Debt Funds (closed-end) Classification contained 8, 8, 7 and 5 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Subsequent to 5/31/08, the Trusts Lipper Classification was changed to the Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) Classification.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
5
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
MMV |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
9.11 |
% |
One Year |
|
-1.93 |
|
Five Years |
|
2.52 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-1.69 |
% |
One Year |
|
-4.66 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.23 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.60 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
7.47 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-0.32 |
% |
One Year |
|
0.84 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.75 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
5.01 |
|
Portfolio Manager: Robert B. MacIntosh, CFA
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
38.8 |
% |
AA |
|
15.2 |
% |
A |
|
27.3 |
% |
BBB |
|
8.0 |
% |
BB |
|
1.2 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
9.5 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
62 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
27.7 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
19.4 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
8.4 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$94.33 |
· |
Leverage:** |
35.7 % |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 38.45% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 43, 43, 43 and 20 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
6
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
EMI |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.66 |
% |
One Year |
|
-9.84 |
|
Five Years |
|
0.51 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-1.90 |
% |
One Year |
|
-2.64 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.38 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.07 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.91 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
7.90 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-0.69 |
% |
One Year |
|
0.47 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.61 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
5.12 |
|
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, CFA
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
43.1 |
% |
AA |
|
13.8 |
% |
A |
|
20.9 |
% |
BBB |
|
11.9 |
% |
BB |
|
3.1 |
% |
CCC |
|
0.9 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
6.3 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
59 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
22.6 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
12.3 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
5.4 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$95.59 |
· |
Leverage:** |
37.3% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 37.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 4, 4, 4, and 3 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year, and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
7
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
EVJ |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
3.36 |
% |
One Year |
|
-10.75 |
|
Five Years |
|
1.77 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
4.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-2.27 |
% |
One Year |
|
-5.30 |
|
Five Years |
|
4.30 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.44 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.73 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
7.99 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-1.23 |
% |
One Year |
|
-1.19 |
|
Five Years |
|
4.05 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.93 |
|
Portfolio Manager: Robert B. MacIntosh, CFA
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
45.0 |
% |
AA |
|
7.0 |
% |
A |
|
20.3 |
% |
BBB |
|
21.2 |
% |
BB |
|
0.4 |
% |
B |
|
1.3 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
4.8 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
74 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
25.3 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
17.7 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
9.0 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$90.81 |
· |
Leverage:** |
36.6% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 40.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 10, 10, 10 and 6 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
8
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
EVY |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
4.77 |
% |
One Year |
|
-4.49 |
|
Five Years |
|
4.11 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-1.39 |
% |
One Year |
|
-4.04 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.97 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.81 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.92 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
8.13 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
0.11 |
% |
One Year |
|
0.13 |
|
Five Years |
|
4.46 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
5.10 |
|
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
33.6 |
% |
AA |
|
27.7 |
% |
A |
|
16.0 |
% |
BBB |
|
10.3 |
% |
BB |
|
2.0 |
% |
B |
|
1.7 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
8.7 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
76 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
23.9 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
16.2 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
8.9 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$97.07 |
· |
Leverage:** |
36.1% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 39.45% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 16, 16, 16 and 6 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
9
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
EVO |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.92 |
% |
One Year |
|
-9.78 |
|
Five Years |
|
0.18 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-2.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
-2.94 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.93 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.18 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.78 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
7.87 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-0.32 |
% |
One Year |
|
0.84 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.75 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
5.01 |
|
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, CFA
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
46.1 |
% |
AA |
|
17.8 |
% |
A |
|
18.6 |
% |
BBB |
|
5.7 |
% |
B |
|
1.9 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
9.9 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
77 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
22.2 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
13.5 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
7.4 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$95.21 |
· |
Leverage:** |
37.0% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 39.26% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 43, 43, 43 and 20 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
10
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
pERFoRMANcE iNFoRMATioN AND poRTFoLio coMposiTioN
Trust Performance(1)
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
EVP |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
3.20 |
% |
One Year |
|
-6.80 |
|
Five Years |
|
2.23 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-0.55 |
% |
One Year |
|
-0.92 |
|
Five Years |
|
4.39 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
5.47 |
|
Market Yields
Market Yield(2) |
|
4.93 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield(3) |
|
7.83 |
|
Index Performance(4)
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index Average Annual Total Returns |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
1.44 |
% |
One Year |
|
3.87 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.67 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.85 |
|
Lipper Averages(5)
Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
-1.09 |
% |
One Year |
|
-0.84 |
|
Five Years |
|
3.17 |
|
Life of Trust (1/31/99) |
|
4.86 |
|
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
Rating Distribution*(6)
By total investments
* |
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2008, is as follows, and the average rating is AA: |
AAA |
|
53.1 |
% |
AA |
|
12.7 |
% |
A |
|
13.5 |
% |
BBB |
|
12.0 |
% |
BB |
|
0.8 |
% |
CCC |
|
1.6 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
6.3 |
% |
Trust Statistics(7)
· |
Number of Issues: |
74 |
· |
Average Maturity: |
22.1 years |
· |
Average Effective Maturity: |
10.9 years |
· |
Average Call Protection: |
6.1 years |
· |
Average Dollar Price: |
$97.77 |
· |
Leverage:** |
36.6% |
** |
The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus Auction Preferred Shares. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). |
(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of leverage resulting from the Trusts issuance of Auction Preferred Shares.
(2) The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and annualizing the result.
(3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 37.00% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure.
(4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indexs total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only.
(5) The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 7, 7, 7 and 4 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
(6) Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust.
(7) Portfolio holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial statements.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
11
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 164.8% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Education 11.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,770 |
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Lutheran University), 5.00%, 10/1/29 |
$ | 2,597,097 | |||||||
500 |
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pepperdine University), 5.00%, 11/1/29 |
507,350 | |||||||||
1,850 |
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 9/1/23 |
1,915,120 | |||||||||
4,000 |
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Stanford University), 5.125%, 1/1/31 |
4,028,200 | |||||||||
2,500 |
San Diego County, Certificates of Participation, (University of San Diego), 5.375%, 10/1/41 |
2,519,600 | |||||||||
$ | 11,567,367 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 3.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,500 | Chula Vista, (San Diego Gas), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | $ | 2,439,175 | |||||||
300 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/25(1)(2) |
302,247 | |||||||||
900 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/37(1)(2) |
835,218 | |||||||||
$ | 3,576,640 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 0.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 405 |
Santa Margarita Water District, Prerefunded to 9/1/09, 6.20%, 9/1/20 |
$ | 433,532 | |||||||
$ | 433,532 | ||||||||||
General Obligations 12.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,000 | California, 5.50%, 3/1/26 | $ | 3,202,740 | |||||||
3,500 | California, 5.50%, 11/1/33 | 3,615,535 | |||||||||
1,610 | California, (AMT), 5.05%, 12/1/36 | 1,539,756 | |||||||||
10 |
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, (Election of 2004), 4.75%, 8/1/37 |
10,029 | |||||||||
4,780 |
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, (Election of 2004), 4.75%, 8/1/37(3) |
4,793,814 | |||||||||
$ | 13,161,874 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 0.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 300 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 292,494 | |||||||
$ | 292,494 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Hospital 29.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,435 |
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 11/15/34 |
$ | 2,363,654 | |||||||
3,100 |
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 4/1/37 |
2,983,068 | |||||||||
870 |
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Sutter Health), Variable Rate, 15.14%, 11/15/46(1)(2) |
863,284 | |||||||||
750 |
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Kaiser Hospital), 5.50%, 8/1/31 |
760,875 | |||||||||
500 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.50%, 7/1/30 |
508,195 | |||||||||
670 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.50%, 7/1/31 |
679,527 | |||||||||
280 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.625%, 7/1/35 |
284,617 | |||||||||
3,900 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Huntington Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/35 |
3,781,674 | |||||||||
765 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/34 |
747,459 | |||||||||
1,750 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/36 |
1,713,582 | |||||||||
850 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 3/1/41 |
811,121 | |||||||||
1,650 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.50%, 11/1/32 |
1,661,484 | |||||||||
1,750 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sonoma County Indian Health), 6.40%, 9/1/29 |
1,793,207 | |||||||||
1,500 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.50%, 8/15/28 |
1,530,870 | |||||||||
1,500 |
Duarte, Hope National Medical Center, (City of Hope), 5.25%, 4/1/24 |
1,511,265 | |||||||||
410 | Tahoe Forest Hospital District, 5.85%, 7/1/22 | 415,670 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Torrance Hospital, (Torrance Memorial Medical Center), 5.50%, 6/1/31 |
2,014,260 | |||||||||
1,250 | Turlock, (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.), 5.375%, 10/15/34 | 1,137,875 | |||||||||
2,780 | Washington Township Health Care District, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 2,694,710 | |||||||||
2,000 | Washington Township Health Care District, 5.25%, 7/1/29 | 2,010,360 | |||||||||
$ | 30,266,757 | ||||||||||
Housing 2.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,750 | California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.75%, 8/1/42 | $ | 1,507,940 | |||||||
735 |
Commerce (Hermitage III Senior Apartments), 6.50%, 12/1/29 |
749,005 | |||||||||
426 |
Commerce (Hermitage III Senior Apartments), 6.85%, 12/1/29 |
430,266 | |||||||||
$ | 2,687,211 |
See notes to financial statements
12
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 1.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Anheuser Busch Project), 4.80%, 9/1/46 |
$ | 1,692,640 | |||||||
$ | 1,692,640 | ||||||||||
Insured-Education 6.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,270 |
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pooled College and University), (MBIA), 5.10%, 4/1/23 |
$ | 3,338,081 | |||||||
3,000 | California State University, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/33 | 3,015,210 | |||||||||
$ | 6,353,291 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 9.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,500 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Pacific Gas and Electric), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.35%, 12/1/16 |
$ | 2,596,125 | |||||||
3,250 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Southern California Edison Co.), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.55%, 9/1/31 |
3,279,477 | |||||||||
3,625 |
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Power System Revenue, (FSA), 4.625%, 7/1/37 |
3,599,045 | |||||||||
$ | 9,474,647 | ||||||||||
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded 4.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 5,130 |
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, (FSA), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 1/1/26 |
$ | 2,220,007 | |||||||
1,995 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/10, 5.25%, 7/1/29(3) |
2,135,940 | |||||||||
$ | 4,355,947 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 14.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 7,000 |
Coast Community College District, (Election of 2002), (FSA), 0.00%, 8/1/34 |
$ | 1,704,850 | |||||||
4,825 |
Coast Community College District, (Election of 2002), (FSA), 0.00%, 8/1/35 |
1,109,460 | |||||||||
2,500 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(1)(2) | 2,972,150 | |||||||||
4,800 |
San Diego Unified School District, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/24(3) |
5,463,696 | |||||||||
7,995 |
Sweetwater Union High School District, (Election 2000), (FSA), 0.00%, 8/1/25 |
3,424,338 | |||||||||
$ | 14,674,494 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 11.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,200 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Children's Hospital Los Angeles), (MBIA), 5.25%, 8/15/29(4) |
$ | 3,279,712 | |||||||
5,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/38 |
5,097,550 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Insured-Hospital (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 3,735 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (FSA), 5.75%, 8/15/27(3) |
$ | 3,858,815 | |||||||
$ | 12,236,077 | ||||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 11.9% |
|||||||||||
$ | 6,500 |
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, Lease Revenue, (Public Improvements), (FSA), 0.00%, 9/1/17 |
$ | 4,299,555 | |||||||
10,750 |
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, Lease Revenue, (Public Improvements), (FSA), 0.00%, 9/1/25 |
4,396,535 | |||||||||
3,600 | San Diego County Water Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 5/1/38 | 3,701,952 | |||||||||
$ | 12,398,042 | ||||||||||
Insured-Other Revenue 1.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,855 |
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., (FGIC), 5.00%, 6/1/38 |
$ | 1,790,743 | |||||||
$ | 1,790,743 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 5.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,185 |
Palm Springs Community Redevelopment Agency, Tax Allocation (Merged Project No. 1), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/30 |
$ | 1,194,516 | |||||||
24,800 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 1,782,872 | |||||||||
4,225 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 563,150 | |||||||||
8,380 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 1,053,031 | |||||||||
5,270 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 622,545 | |||||||||
$ | 5,216,114 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 6.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 5,000 |
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 10/1/29 |
$ | 1,577,650 | |||||||
8,000 |
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, (MBIA), 0.00%, 10/1/31 |
2,240,000 | |||||||||
740 |
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(3) |
809,283 | |||||||||
10,000 |
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, (MBIA), 0.00%, 1/15/32 |
2,451,600 | |||||||||
$ | 7,078,533 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 2.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,710 |
San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission, (FSA), 4.25%, 11/1/33 |
$ | 2,531,628 | |||||||
$ | 2,531,628 |
See notes to financial statements
13
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Insured-Water Revenue 3.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 4,400 |
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, (MBIA), 3.00%, 7/1/30 |
$ | 3,323,716 | |||||||
$ | 3,323,716 | ||||||||||
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 4.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 4,000 | Sacramento City Financing Authority, 5.40%, 11/1/20 | $ | 4,389,080 | |||||||
$ | 4,389,080 | ||||||||||
Other Revenue 2.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 385 |
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles), 5.00%, 12/1/32 |
$ | 389,647 | |||||||
580 |
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles), 5.00%, 12/1/37 |
584,802 | |||||||||
1,420 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., 5.75%, 6/1/47 | 1,239,291 | |||||||||
$ | 2,213,740 | ||||||||||
Senior Living / Life Care 0.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 175 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Senior Living - Presbyterian Homes), 4.75%, 11/15/26 |
$ | 156,349 | |||||||
700 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Senior Living - Presbyterian Homes), 4.875%, 11/15/36 |
596,505 | |||||||||
$ | 752,854 | ||||||||||
Special Tax Revenue 17.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,500 | Bonita Canyon Public Financing Authority, 5.375%, 9/1/28 | $ | 1,418,490 | |||||||
285 | Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/2/26 | 247,485 | |||||||||
460 | Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/2/34 | 380,346 | |||||||||
1,665 | Corona Public Financing Authority, 5.80%, 9/1/20 | 1,659,772 | |||||||||
200 |
Eastern California Municipal Water District, Special Tax Revenue, District No. 2004-27 Cottonwood, 5.00%, 9/1/27 |
180,604 | |||||||||
500 |
Eastern California Municipal Water District, Special Tax Revenue, District No. 2004-27 Cottonwood, 5.00%, 9/1/36 |
432,610 | |||||||||
1,590 |
Fontana Redevelopment Agency, (Jurupa Hills), 5.60%, 10/1/27 |
1,622,245 | |||||||||
1,305 |
Lincoln Public Financing Authority, Improvement Bond Act of 1915, (Twelve Bridges), 6.20%, 9/2/25 |
1,321,874 | |||||||||
420 |
Moreno Valley Unified School District, (Community School District No. 2003-2), 5.75%, 9/1/24 |
408,089 | |||||||||
750 |
Moreno Valley Unified School District, (Community School District No. 2003-2), 5.90%, 9/1/29 |
716,303 | |||||||||
2,450 | Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, 5.40%, 9/2/18 | 2,520,119 | |||||||||
995 | Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, 5.50%, 9/2/24 | 1,021,029 | |||||||||
1,325 | San Pablo Redevelopment Agency, 5.65%, 12/1/23 | 1,361,265 | |||||||||
1,095 | Santa Margarita Water District, 6.20%, 9/1/20 | 1,121,915 | |||||||||
250 | Santaluz Community Facilities District No. 2, 6.10%, 9/1/21 | 250,363 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Special Tax Revenue (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
Santaluz Community Facilities District No. 2, 6.20%, 9/1/30 |
$ | 500,295 | |||||||
250 | Temecula Unified School District, 5.00%, 9/1/27 | 223,103 | |||||||||
400 | Temecula Unified School District, 5.00%, 9/1/37 | 340,508 | |||||||||
500 | Turlock Public Financing Authority, 5.45%, 9/1/24 | 490,710 | |||||||||
500 | Tustin Community Facilities District, 6.00%, 9/1/37 | 475,855 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Whittier Public Financing Authority, (Greenleaf Avenue Redevelopment), 5.50%, 11/1/23 |
994,300 | |||||||||
$ | 17,687,280 | ||||||||||
Transportation 1.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,170 | Port of Redwood City, (AMT), 5.125%, 6/1/30 | $ | 1,108,692 | |||||||
$ | 1,108,692 | ||||||||||
Water and Sewer 1.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,840 | California Department of Water Resources, 5.00%, 12/1/29 | $ | 1,922,506 | |||||||
$ | 1,922,506 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 164.8% (identified cost $171,153,242) |
$ | 171,185,899 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (8.0)% | $ | (8,316,207 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (56.8)% |
$ | (59,004,012 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 103,865,680 |
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
DRIVERS - Derivative Inverse Tax-Exempt Receipts
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
See notes to financial statements
14
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 46.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.5% to 21.0% of total investments.
(1) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $4,972,899 or 4.8% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(2) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
(3) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
(4) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
See notes to financial statements
15
Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 166.1% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Education 3.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), 6.00%, 5/15/59 |
$ | 1,089,120 | |||||||
1,000 |
Volusia County Educational Facilities Authority, (Embry Riddle Aeronautical), 5.75%, 10/15/29 |
1,003,330 | |||||||||
$ | 2,092,450 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 0.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 435 |
Vista Lakes Community Development District, Prerefunded to 5/1/10, 7.20%, 5/1/32 |
$ | 474,533 | |||||||
$ | 474,533 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 0.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 147 |
Osceola County Industrial Development Authority, Community Provider Pooled Loan, 7.75%, 7/1/17 |
$ | 147,084 | |||||||
200 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
194,996 | |||||||||
$ | 342,080 | ||||||||||
Hospital 14.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 515 |
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 4/1/37 |
$ | 495,574 | |||||||
275 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.50%, 7/1/30 |
279,507 | |||||||||
365 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.50%, 7/1/31 |
370,190 | |||||||||
150 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.625%, 7/1/35 |
152,473 | |||||||||
350 |
Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35 |
309,585 | |||||||||
210 |
Highlands County Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/36 |
207,396 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/32 |
1,990,400 | |||||||||
2,500 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), 5.00%, 7/1/36 |
2,577,850 | |||||||||
315 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.125%, 12/1/29 |
316,720 | |||||||||
635 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.25%, 12/1/37 |
640,594 | |||||||||
1,400 | West Orange Health Care District, 5.80%, 2/1/31 | 1,425,466 | |||||||||
$ | 8,765,755 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Housing 15.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 330 |
California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.75%, 8/1/42 |
$ | 284,354 | |||||||
650 |
Capital Trust Agency, (Atlantic Housing Foundation), 5.30%, 7/1/35 |
566,390 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Delaware Housing Authority, (Senior Single Family Mortgage), (AMT), 5.30%, 1/1/49 |
1,879,880 | |||||||||
505 |
Escambia County Housing Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (Multi-County Program), (AMT), 5.50%, 10/1/31 |
506,055 | |||||||||
475 |
Florida Capital Projects Finance Authority, Student Housing Revenue, (Florida University), Prerefunded to 8/15/10, 7.75%, 8/15/20 |
531,629 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Maryland Community Development Authority, Multifamily Housing, (AMT), 4.85%, 9/1/47 |
1,747,300 | |||||||||
710 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.30%, 12/1/37 |
692,420 | |||||||||
3,000 |
Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 5.10%, 10/1/35 |
2,884,380 | |||||||||
$ | 9,092,408 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 16.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, (Dow Chemical Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33 |
$ | 1,019,260 | |||||||
754 |
Broward County, (Lynxs Cargoport), (AMT), 6.75%, 6/1/19 |
735,826 | |||||||||
1,060 |
Capital Trust Agency, (Fort Lauderdale Project), (AMT), 5.75%, 1/1/32 |
974,469 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Denver, CO, City and County Special Facilities, (United Airlines), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/32 |
1,384,400 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Houston, TX, Airport System, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 6.75%, 7/1/29 |
856,000 | |||||||||
2,250 |
Liberty Development Corp., NY, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35(1) |
2,353,874 | |||||||||
280 |
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (America West Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/19 |
240,643 | |||||||||
650 |
Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines), (AMT), 6.30%, 6/1/23 |
436,312 | |||||||||
2,000 |
St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.), 5.125%, 6/1/37 |
1,890,520 | |||||||||
$ | 9,891,304 | ||||||||||
Insured-Education 2.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,735 |
University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/40 |
$ | 1,759,134 | |||||||
$ | 1,759,134 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 2.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,600 |
Burke County, GA, Development Authority, (Georgia Power Co.), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.45%, 5/1/34(2) |
$ | 1,600,128 | |||||||
$ | 1,600,128 |
See notes to financial statements
16
Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded 1.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 650 |
Dade County, Professional Sports Franchise Facility, (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.25%, 10/1/30 |
$ | 708,071 | |||||||
$ | 708,071 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 9.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
King County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 1, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/37 |
$ | 1,276,650 | |||||||
1,500 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(3)(4) | 1,783,290 | |||||||||
5,040 | San Juan, CA, Unified School District, (FSA), 0.00%, 8/1/23 | 2,404,030 | |||||||||
$ | 5,463,970 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 15.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,500 |
Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center), (MBIA), 5.25%, 11/1/35 |
$ | 2,460,600 | |||||||
3,250 |
Indiana Health and Educational Facilities Finance Authority, (Sisters of St. Francis Health Services), (FSA), 5.25%, 5/15/41 |
3,302,618 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mayo Clinic Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 11/15/37 |
1,009,970 | |||||||||
2,500 |
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Lifebridge Health), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/47(1) |
2,473,200 | |||||||||
$ | 9,246,388 | ||||||||||
Insured-Housing 1.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,100 |
Broward County Housing Finance Authority, Multifamily Housing, (Venice Homes Apartments), (FSA), (AMT), 5.70%, 1/1/32 |
$ | 1,077,318 | |||||||
$ | 1,077,318 | ||||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 8.2% |
|||||||||||
$ | 1,795 |
Newberry, SC, (Newberry County School District), (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/30 |
$ | 1,829,859 | |||||||
3,000 |
San Diego County, CA, Water Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 5/1/38 |
3,084,960 | |||||||||
$ | 4,914,819 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 10.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 670 |
Baton Rouge, LA, Public Improvement, (FSA), 4.25%, 8/1/32 |
$ | 623,938 | |||||||
690 | Louisiana Gas and Fuels Tax, (FGIC), (FSA), 5.00%, 5/1/41 | 703,076 | |||||||||
3,040 |
Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA), 0.00%, 10/1/35 |
653,752 | |||||||||
5,000 |
Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA), 0.00%, 10/1/38 |
892,950 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 5,610 |
Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA), 0.00%, 10/1/40 |
$ | 877,909 | |||||||
14,850 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 1,067,567 | |||||||||
2,535 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 337,890 | |||||||||
5,030 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 632,070 | |||||||||
3,165 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 373,881 | |||||||||
$ | 6,163,033 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 18.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,960 |
Central Puget Sound Regional Transportation Authority, WA, Sales Revenue, (FSA), 5.00%, 11/1/34 |
$ | 2,019,310 | |||||||
670 |
Chicago, IL, (O'Hare International Airport), (FSA), 4.50%, 1/1/38 |
640,426 | |||||||||
240 |
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, International Airport, (MBIA), (AMT), 6.10%, 11/1/24 |
243,427 | |||||||||
200 |
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, International Airport, (MBIA), (AMT), 6.25%, 11/1/28 |
202,956 | |||||||||
2,250 |
Florida Ports Financing Commission, (FGIC), (AMT), 5.50%, 10/1/29 |
2,257,965 | |||||||||
650 |
Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, (FSA), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/34 |
623,597 | |||||||||
3,975 |
Miami-Dade County, Aviation Revenue, (Miami International Airport), (AGC), (CIFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/38 |
3,784,240 | |||||||||
1,415 |
San Antonio, TX, Airport System, (FSA), (AMT), 5.25%, 7/1/32 |
1,401,572 | |||||||||
$ | 11,173,493 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 22.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,755 |
Austin, TX, Water and Wastewater System Revenue, (FSA), 5.00%, 11/15/33 |
$ | 3,853,907 | |||||||
1,000 |
Emerald Coast, Utility Authority Revenue, (FGIC), 4.75%, 1/1/31 |
926,780 | |||||||||
3,335 | Fernley, NV, Water and Sewer (AGC), 5.00%, 2/1/38 | 3,422,244 | |||||||||
640 | Miami Beach, Storm Water, (FGIC), 5.375%, 9/1/30 | 651,680 | |||||||||
1,000 | Okeechobee Utility Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/25 | 1,026,660 | |||||||||
530 |
Pearland, TX, Waterworks and Sewer Systems, (FSA), 4.50%, 9/1/34 |
513,294 | |||||||||
1,156 | Tampa Bay Water Utility System, (FGIC), 4.75%, 10/1/27(1) | 1,158,368 | |||||||||
1,844 |
Tampa Bay Water Utility System, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 10/1/08, 4.75%, 10/1/27(1) |
1,879,792 | |||||||||
$ | 13,432,725 | ||||||||||
Nursing Home 1.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 265 |
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster Community Care), 6.60%, 4/1/24 |
$ | 267,889 |
See notes to financial statements
17
Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Nursing Home (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 735 |
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster Community Care), 6.75%, 4/1/34 |
$ | 745,172 | |||||||
$ | 1,013,061 | ||||||||||
Other Revenue 4.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 16,500 |
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, OH, 0.00%, 6/1/47 |
$ | 896,115 | |||||||
1,000 |
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.00%, 6/1/48 |
891,700 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Salt Verde, AZ, Financial Corporation, Senior Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/37 |
888,880 | |||||||||
$ | 2,676,695 | ||||||||||
Special Tax Revenue 15.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 85 |
Covington Park Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/21 |
$ | 85,887 | |||||||
500 |
Covington Park Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/31 |
485,375 | |||||||||
240 |
Dupree Lakes Community Development District, 5.00%, 11/1/10 |
231,864 | |||||||||
205 |
Dupree Lakes Community Development District, 5.00%, 5/1/12 |
191,577 | |||||||||
355 |
Dupree Lakes Community Development District, 5.375%, 5/1/37 |
283,652 | |||||||||
310 |
Heritage Harbor South Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 6.20%, 5/1/35 |
313,187 | |||||||||
230 |
Heritage Springs Community Development District, 5.25%, 5/1/26 |
213,468 | |||||||||
665 |
Heritage Springs Community Development District, 6.75%, 5/1/21 |
665,432 | |||||||||
340 |
New River Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/13 |
311,093 | |||||||||
140 |
New River Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.35%, 5/1/38 |
107,451 | |||||||||
340 |
North Springs Improvement District, (Heron Bay), 5.20%, 5/1/27 |
253,779 | |||||||||
595 |
North Springs Improvement District, (Heron Bay), 7.00%, 5/1/19 |
595,696 | |||||||||
985 |
River Hall Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.45%, 5/1/36 |
774,358 | |||||||||
475 |
Southern Hills Plantation I Community Development District, 5.80%, 5/1/35 |
417,454 | |||||||||
600 |
Sterling Hill Community Development District, 6.20%, 5/1/35 |
605,424 | |||||||||
500 |
Stoneybrook West Community Development District, 7.00%, 5/1/32 |
516,165 | |||||||||
990 |
Tisons Landing Community Development District, 5.625%, 5/1/37 |
696,604 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Special Tax Revenue (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 740 |
University Square Community Development District, 6.75%, 5/1/20 |
$ | 751,551 | |||||||
685 | Waterlefe Community Development District, 6.95%, 5/1/31 | 713,592 | |||||||||
175 |
West Palm Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, (Northwood Pleasant Community), 5.00%, 3/1/29 |
158,510 | |||||||||
1,270 |
West Palm Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, (Northwood Pleasant Community), 5.00%, 3/1/35 |
1,120,915 | |||||||||
$ | 9,493,034 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 166.1% (identified cost $100,505,319) |
$ | 99,380,399 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (6.8)% | $ | (4,043,649 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (59.3)% |
$ | (35,507,238 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 59,829,512 |
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
At May 31, 2008, the concentration of the Trust's investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of total investments, is as follows:
Florida | 33.2 | % | |||||
Others, representing less than 10% individually | 66.8 | % | |||||
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Florida and other state municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 55.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.1% to 23.2% of total investments.
See notes to financial statements
18
Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
(3) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $1,783,290 or 3.0% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(4) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
See notes to financial statements
19
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 156.7% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Education 20.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,790 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), 5.45%, 5/15/59 |
$ | 2,770,888 | |||||||
600 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Middlesex School), 5.00%, 9/1/33 |
602,706 | |||||||||
500 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Mount Holyoke College), 5.25%, 7/1/31 |
511,210 | |||||||||
1,500 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Wheeler School), 6.50%, 12/1/29 |
1,535,685 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Xaverian Brothers High School), 5.65%, 7/1/29 |
1,001,480 | |||||||||
1,500 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Berklee College of Music), 5.00%, 10/1/32 |
1,508,790 | |||||||||
$ | 7,930,759 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 9.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Devens Electric System), 6.00%, 12/1/30 |
$ | 1,039,520 | |||||||
1,870 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Dominion Energy Brayton Point), (AMT), 5.00%, 2/1/36 |
1,708,058 | |||||||||
275 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/25(1)(2) |
277,060 | |||||||||
825 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/37(1)(2) |
765,616 | |||||||||
$ | 3,790,254 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 9.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 400 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Western New England College), Prerefunded to 12/1/12, 6.125%, 12/1/32 |
$ | 454,840 | |||||||
235 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Healthcare System-Covenant Health), Prerefunded to 1/1/12, 6.00%, 7/1/31 |
261,202 | |||||||||
1,265 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (South Shore Hospital), Prerefunded to 7/1/09, 5.75%, 7/1/29 |
1,326,593 | |||||||||
980 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Winchester Hospital), Prerefunded to 7/1/10, 6.75%, 7/1/30 |
1,063,829 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Rail Connections, Inc., (Route 128 Parking), (ACA), Prerefunded to 7/1/09, 0.00%, 7/1/20 |
490,620 | |||||||||
$ | 3,597,084 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 3.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 510 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (MCHSP Human Services), 6.60%, 8/15/29 |
$ | 471,969 | |||||||
700 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Learning Center for Deaf Children), 6.125%, 7/1/29 |
684,173 | |||||||||
100 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
97,498 | |||||||||
$ | 1,253,640 | ||||||||||
Hospital 21.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Biomedical Research Corp.), 6.25%, 8/1/20 |
$ | 1,060,790 | |||||||
1,000 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Baystate Medical Center), 5.75%, 7/1/33 |
1,012,260 | |||||||||
400 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Berkshire Health System), 6.25%, 10/1/31 |
410,364 | |||||||||
330 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.), 5.125%, 7/1/38(3) |
322,073 | |||||||||
105 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Central New England Health Systems), 6.30%, 8/1/18 |
105,193 | |||||||||
1,575 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), 5.00%, 12/1/37 |
1,570,181 | |||||||||
865 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Healthcare System-Covenant Health), 6.00%, 7/1/31 |
891,659 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Partners Healthcare Systems), 5.00%, 7/1/32(4) |
2,034,990 | |||||||||
735 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (South Shore Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/29 |
743,849 | |||||||||
$ | 8,151,359 | ||||||||||
Housing 13.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,100 | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, 4.75%, 12/1/48 | $ | 1,812,321 | |||||||
1,000 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.85%, 6/1/40 |
871,870 | |||||||||
650 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/28 |
623,441 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.10%, 12/1/37 |
1,914,800 | |||||||||
$ | 5,222,432 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 1.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 695 |
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, (American Hingham Water Co.), (AMT), 6.60%, 12/1/15 |
$ | 696,251 | |||||||
$ | 696,251 |
See notes to financial statements
20
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Insured-Education 16.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority, (XLCA), 5.50%, 5/1/39 |
$ | 1,096,690 | |||||||
1,000 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), (XLCA), 5.375%, 5/15/39 |
1,030,970 | |||||||||
1,365 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (College of the Holy Cross), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 9/1/32(4) |
1,504,394 | |||||||||
1,600 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Franklin W. Olin College), (XLCA), 5.25%, 7/1/33 |
1,597,712 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Northeastern University), (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/29(5) |
1,007,870 | |||||||||
$ | 6,237,636 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 8.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,255 | Milford, (FSA), 4.25%, 12/15/46 | $ | 2,052,027 | |||||||
900 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(1)(2) | 1,069,974 | |||||||||
$ | 3,122,001 | ||||||||||
Insured-Other Revenue 3.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH Educational Foundation), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 1/1/42 |
$ | 1,478,888 | |||||||
$ | 1,478,888 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 7.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,500 | Martha's Vineyard Land Bank, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/1/32 | $ | 1,509,030 | |||||||
8,945 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 643,056 | |||||||||
1,520 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 202,601 | |||||||||
3,015 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 378,865 | |||||||||
1,905 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 225,038 | |||||||||
$ | 2,958,590 | ||||||||||
Insured-Student Loan 4.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,985 |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.70%, 1/1/33 |
$ | 1,699,359 | |||||||
$ | 1,699,359 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 15.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 800 |
Massachusetts Port Authority, (Bosfuel Project), (FGIC), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/32 |
$ | 755,064 | |||||||
2,000 |
Massachusetts Port Authority, (Bosfuel Project), (FGIC), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/38 |
1,861,940 | |||||||||
3,300 |
Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Metropolitan Highway System, (MBIA), 5.00%, 1/1/37 |
3,301,188 | |||||||||
$ | 5,918,192 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security |
Value |
|||||||||
Nursing Home 2.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
Boston Industrial Development Authority, (Alzheimer's Center), (FHA), 6.00%, 2/1/37 |
$ | 505,865 | |||||||
580 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Christopher House), 6.875%, 1/1/29 |
581,044 | |||||||||
$ | 1,086,909 | ||||||||||
Senior Living / Life Care 7.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 250 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Berkshire Retirement), 5.15%, 7/1/31 |
$ | 224,768 | |||||||
1,500 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Berkshire Retirement), 5.625%, 7/1/29 |
1,466,430 | |||||||||
140 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (First Mortgage VOA Concord), 5.125%, 11/1/27 |
117,813 | |||||||||
425 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (First Mortgage VOA Concord), 5.20%, 11/1/41 |
337,858 | |||||||||
910 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Linden Ponds, Inc.), 5.75%, 11/15/42 |
797,533 | |||||||||
$ | 2,944,402 | ||||||||||
Special Tax Revenue 4.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,665 | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 0.00%, 7/1/31 | $ | 498,568 | |||||||
5,195 | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 0.00%, 7/1/34 | 1,290,698 | |||||||||
$ | 1,789,266 | ||||||||||
Water and Sewer 7.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 100 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.00%, 8/1/32 |
$ | 101,496 | |||||||
965 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.375%, 8/1/27 |
991,296 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 4.00%, 8/1/46 |
1,704,420 | |||||||||
$ | 2,797,212 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 156.7% (identified cost $61,426,566) |
$ | 60,674,234 |
See notes to financial statements
21
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Short-Term Investments 2.8% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Description | Value | |||||||||
$ | 1,060 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Wentworth Institute), (AMBAC), (SPA: State Street Bank and Trust Co.), Variable Rate, 6.25%, 10/1/30(6) |
$ | 1,060,000 | |||||||
Total Short-Term Investments (identified cost $1,060,000) |
$ | 1,060,000 | |||||||||
Total Investments 159.5% (identified cost $62,486,566) |
$ | 61,734,234 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (3.9)% | $ | (1,515,973 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (55.6)% |
$ | (21,507,623 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 38,710,638 |
ACA - ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
DRIVERS - Derivative Inverse Tax-Exempt Receipts
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHA - Federal Housing Administration
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
SPA - Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Massachusetts municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 36.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 4.2% to 12.8% of total investments.
(1) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $2,112,650 or 5.5% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(2) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
(3) When-issued security.
(4) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
(5) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities.
(6) Variable rate demand obligation. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
See notes to financial statements
22
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 156.8% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Education 6.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Creative Studies), 5.90%, 12/1/27 |
$ | 1,275,375 | |||||||
540 |
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Hillsdale College), 5.00%, 3/1/35 |
530,572 | |||||||||
$ | 1,805,947 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 9.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Pollution Control), 5.45%, 9/1/29 |
$ | 1,262,487 | |||||||
375 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/25(1)(2) |
377,809 | |||||||||
1,125 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/37(1)(2) |
1,044,022 | |||||||||
$ | 2,684,318 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 11.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
Kent Hospital Finance Authority, (Spectrum Health), Prerefunded to 7/15/11, 5.50%, 1/15/31 |
$ | 543,685 | |||||||
750 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Ascension Health Care), Prerefunded to 11/15/09, 6.125%, 11/15/26 |
798,495 | |||||||||
750 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Sparrow Obligation Group), Prerefunded to 11/15/11, 5.625%, 11/15/36 |
822,532 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Prerefunded to 7/1/12, 5.25%, 7/1/31 |
1,096,170 | |||||||||
$ | 3,260,882 | ||||||||||
General Obligations 10.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 | East Grand Rapids Public School District, 5.00%, 5/1/25 | $ | 517,115 | |||||||
1,000 | Manistee Area Public Schools, 5.00%, 5/1/24 | 1,032,550 | |||||||||
345 |
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (Commonwealth Guaranteed), 5.25%, 7/1/29 |
344,110 | |||||||||
1,000 |
White Cloud Public Schools, Prerefunded to 5/1/11, 5.125%, 5/1/31 |
1,068,630 | |||||||||
$ | 2,962,405 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 0.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 100 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 97,498 | |||||||
$ | 97,498 | ||||||||||
Hospital 29.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
Allegan Hospital Finance Authority, (Allegan General Hospital), 7.00%, 11/15/21 |
$ | 516,380 | |||||||
185 |
Gaylord Hospital Finance Authority, (Otsego Memorial Hospital Association), 6.20%, 1/1/25 |
178,730 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Hospital (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 125 |
Gaylord Hospital Finance Authority, (Otsego Memorial Hospital Association), 6.50%, 1/1/37 |
$ | 121,904 | |||||||
275 |
Kent Hospital Finance Authority, (Spectrum Health), 5.50%, 1/15/47 |
294,605 | |||||||||
560 |
Macomb County Hospital Finance Authority, (Mount Clemens General Hospital), 5.875%, 11/15/34 |
528,702 | |||||||||
500 |
Mecosta County, (Michigan General Hospital), 6.00%, 5/15/18 |
500,985 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Central Michigan Community Hospital), 6.25%, 10/1/27 |
1,001,920 | |||||||||
750 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System), 5.00%, 11/15/38 |
711,277 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/46 |
976,250 | |||||||||
1,080 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (McLaren Healthcare), 5.00%, 8/1/35 |
1,023,138 | |||||||||
750 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Memorial Healthcare Center), 5.875%, 11/15/21 |
764,543 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Trinity Health), 6.00%, 12/1/27 |
1,059,430 | |||||||||
800 |
Saginaw Hospital Finance Authority, (Covenant Medical Center), 6.50%, 7/1/30 |
847,472 | |||||||||
$ | 8,525,336 | ||||||||||
Housing 3.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Michigan State Housing Development Authority, (Williams Pavilion), (AMT), 4.90%, 4/20/48 |
$ | 890,480 | |||||||
$ | 890,480 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 7.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Detroit Local Development Finance Authority, (Chrysler Corp.), 5.375%, 5/1/21 |
$ | 855,240 | |||||||
800 |
Dickinson County Electronic Development Corp., (International Paper Co.), 5.75%, 6/1/16 |
809,240 | |||||||||
625 |
Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 |
402,556 | |||||||||
$ | 2,067,036 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 6.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Co.), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.55%, 9/1/29 |
$ | 1,007,880 | |||||||
500 |
Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Co.), (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/15/32 |
478,075 | |||||||||
500 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 502,100 | |||||||||
$ | 1,988,055 |
See notes to financial statements
23
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded 14.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Central Montcalm Public Schools, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 5/1/09, 6.00%, 5/1/29 |
$ | 1,036,940 | |||||||
1,000 |
Detroit Sewer Disposal, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 7/1/11, 5.125%, 7/1/31 |
1,071,780 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Novi Building Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 10/1/10, 5.50%, 10/1/25 |
2,159,600 | |||||||||
$ | 4,268,320 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 8.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 650 | Detroit City School District, (FGIC), 4.75%, 5/1/28 | $ | 652,262 | |||||||
750 | Detroit City School District, (FSA), 5.25%, 5/1/32 | 828,345 | |||||||||
200 | Eaton Rapids Public Schools, (MBIA), 4.75%, 5/1/25 | 200,652 | |||||||||
700 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(1)(2) | 832,202 | |||||||||
$ | 2,513,461 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 6.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, (William Beaumont Hospital), (MBIA), 5.25%, 11/15/35 |
$ | 1,010,700 | |||||||
1,000 |
Saginaw Hospital Finance Authority, (Covenant Medical Center), (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/24 |
1,028,240 | |||||||||
$ | 2,038,940 | ||||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 5.2% |
|||||||||||
$ | 4,300 |
Michigan State Building Authority, (FGIC), 0.00%, 10/15/30 |
$ | 1,196,690 | |||||||
1,000 |
Michigan State Building Authority, (FGIC), (FSA), 0.00%, 10/15/29 |
316,840 | |||||||||
$ | 1,513,530 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 11.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 5,160 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 |
$ | 370,952 | |||||||
1,225 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 163,280 | |||||||||
2,430 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 305,354 | |||||||||
1,470 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 173,651 | |||||||||
2,250 |
Wayne Charter County, (Airport Hotel-Detroit Metropolitan Airport), (MBIA), 5.00%, 12/1/30 |
2,270,745 | |||||||||
$ | 3,283,982 | ||||||||||
Insured-Student Loan 6.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 3/1/31 |
$ | 941,640 | |||||||
1,000 |
Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.50%, 6/1/25(3) |
981,600 | |||||||||
$ | 1,923,240 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Transportation 6.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Wayne Charter County Airport, (AGC), (AMT), 5.375%, 12/1/32 |
$ | 1,001,190 | |||||||
1,000 |
Wayne Charter County Airport, (MBIA), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/28 |
968,840 | |||||||||
$ | 1,970,030 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 5.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,650 | Detroit Water Supply System, (FGIC), 5.00%, 7/1/30 | $ | 1,623,914 | |||||||
$ | 1,623,914 | ||||||||||
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 0.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 250 |
Puerto Rico, (Guaynabo Municipal Government Center Lease), 5.625%, 7/1/22 |
$ | 250,083 | |||||||
$ | 250,083 | ||||||||||
Other Revenue 3.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 12,500 |
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 0.00%, 6/1/52 |
$ | 457,500 | |||||||
500 |
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.00%, 6/1/48 |
445,850 | |||||||||
$ | 903,350 | ||||||||||
Transportation 5.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,500 | Kent County Airport Facility, 5.00%, 1/1/25(4) | $ | 1,510,388 | |||||||
$ | 1,510,388 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 156.8% (identified cost $46,129,252) |
$ | 46,081,195 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities 2.8% | $ | 819,382 | |||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (59.6)% |
$ | (17,503,568 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 29,397,009 |
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
DRIVERS - Derivative Inverse Tax-Exempt Receipts
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
See notes to financial statements
24
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Michigan municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 45.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.0% to 17.7% of total investments.
(1) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $2,254,033 or 7.7% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(2) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
(3) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
(4) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
See notes to financial statements
25
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 172.3% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Education 1.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 250 |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Georgian Court University), 5.00%, 7/1/27 |
$ | 245,465 | |||||||
250 |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Georgian Court University), 5.00%, 7/1/33 |
239,647 | |||||||||
220 |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Georgian Court University), 5.25%, 7/1/37 |
214,546 | |||||||||
$ | 699,658 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 2.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,500 |
Salem County Pollution Control Financing, (Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.), (AMT), 5.75%, 4/1/31 |
$ | 1,438,290 | |||||||
$ | 1,438,290 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 6.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 950 |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 6.75%, 6/1/39 |
$ | 1,103,482 | |||||||
2,500 |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 6.75%, 6/1/39(1) |
2,903,900 | |||||||||
$ | 4,007,382 | ||||||||||
General Obligations 2.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,595 |
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (Commonwealth Guaranteed), 5.25%, 7/1/29 |
$ | 1,590,885 | |||||||
$ | 1,590,885 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 0.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 300 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 292,494 | |||||||
$ | 292,494 | ||||||||||
Hospital 30.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 100 |
Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/25 |
$ | 94,887 | |||||||
90 |
Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35 |
79,608 | |||||||||
100 |
Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.25%, 2/15/27 |
96,302 | |||||||||
2,750 |
Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.75%, 2/15/34 |
2,702,618 | |||||||||
2,060 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (AHS Hospital Corp.), 5.00%, 7/1/27 |
2,062,328 | |||||||||
575 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Atlantic City Medical Center), 5.75%, 7/1/25 |
592,014 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Hospital (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 4,135 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Atlanticare Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/37 |
$ | 3,999,455 | |||||||
2,140 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Capital Health System), 5.25%, 7/1/27 |
2,111,987 | |||||||||
1,765 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Capital Health System), 5.375%, 7/1/33 |
1,693,376 | |||||||||
2,000 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), 6.00%, 1/1/34 |
2,035,960 | |||||||||
2,000 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/31 |
2,043,600 | |||||||||
2,930 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (South Jersey Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/46 |
2,827,948 | |||||||||
$ | 20,340,083 | ||||||||||
Housing 7.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 715 |
New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, (Single Family Housing), (AMT), 4.70%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 641,105 | |||||||
4,490 |
New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, (Single Family Housing), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/37 |
4,245,654 | |||||||||
$ | 4,886,759 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 15.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Gloucester County Improvements Authority, (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 7.00%, 12/1/29 |
$ | 1,042,620 | |||||||
3,000 |
Middlesex County Pollution Control Authority, (Amerada Hess), 6.05%, 9/15/34 |
3,004,320 | |||||||||
3,220 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT), 4.95%, 3/1/47 |
2,849,024 | |||||||||
750 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29 |
607,920 | |||||||||
750 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.00%, 6/1/33 |
781,890 | |||||||||
2,080 |
Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 |
1,798,597 | |||||||||
$ | 10,084,371 | ||||||||||
Insured-Education 5.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,365 |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (College of New Jersey), (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/35(1) |
$ | 3,483,535 | |||||||
$ | 3,483,535 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 3.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), 5.25%, 7/1/35 |
$ | 1,255,350 | |||||||
1,250 |
Vineland, (Electric Utility), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.25%, 5/15/26 |
1,254,038 | |||||||||
$ | 2,509,388 |
See notes to financial statements
26
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded 7.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 4,500 |
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 1/1/10, 5.50%, 1/1/30(1) |
$ | 4,723,290 | |||||||
$ | 4,723,290 | ||||||||||
Insured-Gas Utilities 7.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 5,000 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New Jersey Natural Gas Co.), (FGIC), (AMT), 4.90%, 10/1/40 |
$ | 4,792,700 | |||||||
$ | 4,792,700 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 4.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 635 |
Monroe Township Board of Education, Middlesex County, (AGC), 4.75%, 3/1/36 |
$ | 639,890 | |||||||
225 | Nutley School District, (MBIA), 4.50%, 7/15/29 | 225,659 | |||||||||
550 | Nutley School District, (MBIA), 4.75%, 7/15/30 | 560,582 | |||||||||
725 | Nutley School District, (MBIA), 4.75%, 7/15/31 | 736,774 | |||||||||
510 | Nutley School District, (MBIA), 4.75%, 7/15/32 | 517,864 | |||||||||
400 |
South Orange and Maplewood School District, (AGC), 4.625%, 1/15/26 |
406,980 | |||||||||
$ | 3,087,749 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 5.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 435 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/31 |
$ | 453,957 | |||||||
880 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/36 |
914,214 | |||||||||
1,325 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health System), Series II, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38 |
1,343,815 | |||||||||
550 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health System), Series V, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38 |
557,810 | |||||||||
$ | 3,269,796 | ||||||||||
Insured-Housing 5.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,390 |
New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, (FSA), (AMT), 5.05%, 5/1/34 |
$ | 3,243,552 | |||||||
205 |
New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, Multifamily Housing, (FSA), 5.75%, 5/1/25 |
209,121 | |||||||||
$ | 3,452,673 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 4.1% |
|||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities), (AMBAC), (FSA), 5.00%, 9/1/37 |
$ | 1,032,080 | |||||||
1,590 |
Newark Housing Authority, (Newark Marine Terminal), (MBIA), 5.00%, 1/1/32 |
1,620,973 | |||||||||
$ | 2,653,053 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 19.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 12,030 |
Garden Preservation Trust and Open Space and Farmland, (FSA), 0.00%, 11/1/24 |
$ | 5,450,793 | |||||||
6,000 |
Garden Preservation Trust and Open Space and Farmland, (FSA), 0.00%, 11/1/25 |
2,576,580 | |||||||||
4,315 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (XLCA), 0.00%, 7/1/26 |
1,648,977 | |||||||||
2,020 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (XLCA), 0.00%, 7/1/27 |
727,887 | |||||||||
16,115 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 1,158,507 | |||||||||
2,745 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 365,881 | |||||||||
5,445 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 684,219 | |||||||||
3,425 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 404,595 | |||||||||
$ | 13,017,439 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 13.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Delaware River Port Authority, (FSA), 5.625%, 1/1/26 | $ | 1,027,180 | |||||||
3,250 | Delaware River Port Authority, (FSA), 5.75%, 1/1/26 | 3,347,045 | |||||||||
2,130 |
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), (AMBAC), 4.75%, 12/15/37 |
2,131,576 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (FSA), 5.00%, 8/15/33 |
2,068,480 | |||||||||
$ | 8,574,281 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 4.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,195 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (United Water New Jersey, Inc.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.875%, 11/1/25 |
$ | 3,048,669 | |||||||
$ | 3,048,669 | ||||||||||
Nursing Home 3.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Masonic Charity Foundation), 5.50%, 6/1/31 |
$ | 1,025,440 | |||||||
930 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Victoria Health), 5.20%, 12/20/36(2) |
949,112 | |||||||||
$ | 1,974,552 |
See notes to financial statements
27
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Other Revenue 5.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 7,200 |
Children's Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 |
$ | 333,216 | |||||||
13,280 |
Children's Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55 |
371,973 | |||||||||
4,270 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 0.00%, 6/1/41 | 361,883 | |||||||||
2,925 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/41 | 2,270,297 | |||||||||
$ | 3,337,369 | ||||||||||
Senior Living / Life Care 4.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,700 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Fellowship Village), 5.50%, 1/1/25 |
$ | 1,687,131 | |||||||
1,175 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Seabrook Village), 5.25%, 11/15/36 |
1,002,369 | |||||||||
$ | 2,689,500 | ||||||||||
Special Tax Revenue 1.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 750 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax), 5.50%, 6/15/31 |
$ | 722,865 | |||||||
100 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.), 5.125%, 6/15/27 |
95,890 | |||||||||
175 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.), 5.125%, 6/15/37 |
157,484 | |||||||||
$ | 976,239 | ||||||||||
Transportation 13.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 4,800 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 5.375%, 3/1/28(1) |
$ | 5,239,584 | |||||||
2,000 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 5.75%, 3/15/35(1) |
2,117,712 | |||||||||
1,175 |
South Jersey Port Authority, (Marine Terminal), 5.10%, 1/1/33 |
1,186,903 | |||||||||
$ | 8,544,199 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 172.3% (identified cost $114,711,584) |
$ | 113,474,354 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (14.6)% | $ | (9,608,040 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (57.7)% |
$ | (38,000,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 65,866,314 |
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by New Jersey municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 46.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.1% to 19.8% of total investments.
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
(2) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $949,112 or 1.4% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
See notes to financial statements
28
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 172.0% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Cogeneration 1.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,150 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Nissequogue Cogeneration Partners Facility), (AMT), 5.50%, 1/1/23 |
$ | 1,021,441 | |||||||
$ | 1,021,441 | ||||||||||
Education 5.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency, (Marist College), 5.00%, 7/1/20 |
$ | 1,026,120 | |||||||
3,330 |
Hempstead Industrial Development Agency, (Hofstra University Civic Facilities), 5.00%, 7/1/33 |
3,347,649 | |||||||||
$ | 4,373,769 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 5.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,000 | New York Power Authority, 5.25%, 11/15/40 | $ | 2,039,120 | |||||||
2,100 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Keyspan-Port Jefferson), (AMT), 5.25%, 6/1/27 |
2,056,761 | |||||||||
$ | 4,095,881 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 7.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 200 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Ohel Children's Home), Escrowed to Maturity, 6.25%, 8/15/22 |
$ | 211,044 | |||||||
4,385 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Court Facility), Prerefunded to 5/15/10, 6.00%, 5/15/39 |
4,739,878 | |||||||||
955 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Jefferson's Ferry Project), Prerefunded to 11/1/09, 7.20%, 11/1/19 |
1,034,513 | |||||||||
$ | 5,985,435 | ||||||||||
General Obligations 8.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 6,000 | New York City, 5.25%, 9/15/33 | $ | 6,181,740 | |||||||
680 |
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (Commonwealth Guaranteed), 5.25%, 7/1/29 |
678,246 | |||||||||
$ | 6,859,986 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 6.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,115 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, (A Very Special Place, Inc.), 5.75%, 1/1/29 |
$ | 1,003,957 | |||||||
1,200 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Ohel Children's Home), 6.25%, 8/15/22 |
1,053,048 | |||||||||
200 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
194,996 | |||||||||
50 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Alliance of LI), Series A, Class H, 7.50%, 9/1/15 |
51,600 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 100 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Alliance of LI), Series A, Class I, 7.50%, 9/1/15 |
$ | 103,200 | |||||||
2,600 |
Westchester County Industrial Development Agency, (Children's Village), 5.375%, 3/15/19 |
2,493,114 | |||||||||
$ | 4,899,915 | ||||||||||
Hospital 27.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 205 |
Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, (Women's Christian Association), 6.35%, 11/15/17 |
$ | 207,515 | |||||||
485 |
Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, (Women's Christian Association), 6.40%, 11/15/29 |
477,264 | |||||||||
1,250 |
Fulton County Industrial Development Agency, (Nathan Littauer Hospital), 6.00%, 11/1/18 |
1,235,187 | |||||||||
2,500 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, (Highland Hospital), 5.00%, 8/1/25 |
2,437,950 | |||||||||
400 |
Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, (North Shore Health System), 6.25%, 11/1/21 |
418,904 | |||||||||
2,700 |
New York City Health and Hospital Corp., (Health Systems), 5.25%, 2/15/17 |
2,734,290 | |||||||||
300 |
New York City Health and Hospital Corp., (Health Systems), 5.375%, 2/15/26 |
303,843 | |||||||||
1,500 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Lenox Hill Hospital), 5.50%, 7/1/30 |
1,429,035 | |||||||||
4,000 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), 5.00%, 7/1/36 |
4,124,560 | |||||||||
2,000 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Methodist Hospital), 5.25%, 7/1/33 |
1,916,560 | |||||||||
1,250 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (NYU Hospital Center), 5.625%, 7/1/37 |
1,206,100 | |||||||||
415 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.125%, 12/1/29 |
417,266 | |||||||||
835 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.25%, 12/1/37 |
842,356 | |||||||||
1,250 |
Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (St. Elizabeth's Medical Center), 5.75%, 12/1/19 |
1,219,750 | |||||||||
650 |
Saratoga County Industrial Development Agency, (Saratoga Hospital Project), 5.25%, 12/1/32 |
628,270 | |||||||||
2,105 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility, (Huntington Hospital), 6.00%, 11/1/22 |
2,177,328 | |||||||||
$ | 21,776,178 | ||||||||||
Housing 18.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
New York City Housing Development Corp., (Multi-Family Housing), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/24 |
$ | 1,223,913 | |||||||
2,620 |
New York City Housing Development Corp., (Multi-Family Housing), (AMT), 5.20%, 11/1/40 |
2,543,994 | |||||||||
3,555 |
New York City Housing Development Corp., (Multi-Family Housing), (FNMA), (AMT), 4.60%, 1/15/26 |
3,288,162 |
See notes to financial statements
29
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Housing (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 3,125 |
New York Housing Finance Agency, (FNMA), (AMT), 5.40%, 11/15/42 |
$ | 3,053,250 | |||||||
1,500 | New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 4.875%, 10/1/30 | 1,415,130 | |||||||||
2,000 | New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 4.90%, 10/1/37 | 1,856,240 | |||||||||
1,000 | New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 5.125%, 10/1/37 | 968,240 | |||||||||
$ | 14,348,929 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 15.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,160 |
Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35 |
$ | 1,213,534 | |||||||
4,200 |
Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35(1) |
4,393,897 | |||||||||
1,500 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 8.00%, 8/1/12 |
1,506,825 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), 4.875%, 7/1/41 |
979,840 | |||||||||
2,500 |
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 12/1/34 |
2,529,550 | |||||||||
775 |
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, (Senior Air Cargo), (AMT), 6.125%, 1/1/32 |
763,081 | |||||||||
525 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.125%, 12/1/15 |
532,403 | |||||||||
$ | 11,919,130 | ||||||||||
Insured-Education 2.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,395 |
Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (Hamilton College), (MBIA), 0.00%, 7/1/31 |
$ | 704,537 | |||||||
5,460 |
Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (Hamilton College), (MBIA), 0.00%, 7/1/33 |
1,433,741 | |||||||||
$ | 2,138,278 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 3.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 3,000 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), 5.25%, 7/1/34 |
$ | 3,012,600 | |||||||
$ | 3,012,600 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 2.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,750 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(2)(3) | $ | 2,080,505 | |||||||
$ | 2,080,505 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 7.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 5,000 |
New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/23(4) |
$ | 5,537,300 | |||||||
$ | 5,537,300 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 3.8% |
|||||||||||
$ | 880 |
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., (FGIC), 5.00%, 2/15/47 |
$ | 864,116 | |||||||
2,300 |
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., (MBIA), 4.50%, 2/15/47 |
2,123,360 | |||||||||
$ | 2,987,476 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 8.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45 |
$ | 977,880 | |||||||
1,000 |
New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/44 |
1,003,740 | |||||||||
4,500 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 |
1,077,345 | |||||||||
19,745 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 1,419,468 | |||||||||
3,380 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 450,520 | |||||||||
6,705 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 842,550 | |||||||||
4,225 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 499,099 | |||||||||
$ | 6,270,602 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 10.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 6,235 |
Niagara Frontier Airport Authority, (Buffalo Niagara International Airport), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.625%, 4/1/29 |
$ | 6,292,112 | |||||||
2,030 |
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), 5.25%, 7/1/34 |
2,209,655 | |||||||||
$ | 8,501,767 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 1.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, (Water Services Corp.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/35 |
$ | 955,430 | |||||||
$ | 955,430 | ||||||||||
Other Revenue 6.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,285 |
Albany Industrial Development Agency Civic Facility, (Charitable Leadership), 5.75%, 7/1/26 |
$ | 1,225,916 | |||||||
3,750 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, 5.50%, 10/1/32(1) |
3,905,688 | |||||||||
$ | 5,131,604 | ||||||||||
Senior Living / Life Care 2.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,450 |
Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, (Wartburg Senior Housing, Inc.), 6.20%, 6/1/29 |
$ | 1,417,564 | |||||||
250 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Jefferson's Ferry Project), 5.00%, 11/1/28 |
229,880 | |||||||||
$ | 1,647,444 |
See notes to financial statements
30
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Transportation 24.4% | |||||||||||
$ 1,700 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.50%, 11/15/37 | $ | 1,619,981 | ||||||||
3,200 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.50%, 11/15/38 | 3,042,176 | |||||||||
1,900 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 5.00%, 11/15/37(1) |
1,954,787 | |||||||||
5,400 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 5.375%, 3/1/28(1) |
5,894,532 | |||||||||
1,190 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 4.75%, 6/15/33 |
1,131,440 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 5.75%, 3/15/35(1) |
1,058,856 | |||||||||
4,340 | Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5.00%, 11/15/37 | 4,487,864 | |||||||||
$ | 19,189,636 | ||||||||||
Water and Sewer 3.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 10 |
New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water, (Municipal Water Finance), 5.00%, 6/15/37 |
$ | 10,376 | |||||||
2,540 |
New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water, (Municipal Water Finance), 5.00%, 6/15/37(1) |
2,635,415 | |||||||||
$ | 2,645,791 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 172.0% (identified cost $135,404,347) |
$ | 135,379,097 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (15.4)% | $ | (12,149,967 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (56.6)% |
$ | (44,506,046 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 78,723,084 |
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by New York municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 23.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.5% to 13.2% of total investments.
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
(2) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $2,080,505 or 2.6% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(3) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
(4) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
See notes to financial statements
31
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 162.5% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Cogeneration 1.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 385 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Bay Shore Power), (AMT), 5.875%, 9/1/20 |
$ | 374,809 | |||||||
200 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Bay Shore Power), (AMT), 6.625%, 9/1/20 |
201,800 | |||||||||
$ | 576,609 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 2.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 410 | Clyde, Electric System Revenue, (AMT), 6.00%, 11/15/14 | $ | 420,008 | |||||||
125 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/25(1)(2) |
125,936 | |||||||||
375 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DRIVERS, Variable Rate, 11.25%, 7/1/37(1)(2) |
348,007 | |||||||||
$ | 893,951 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 20.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Delaware County, Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 6.00%, 12/1/25 |
$ | 1,095,360 | |||||||
1,000 |
Franklin County, (Cincinnati Children's Hospital), Prerefunded to 5/1/09, 5.20%, 5/1/29 |
1,048,020 | |||||||||
1,530 |
Hamilton City School District, Prerefunded to 12/1/09, 5.625%, 12/1/24 |
1,623,146 | |||||||||
575 |
Highland County, (Joint Township Hospital District), Prerefunded to 12/1/09, 6.75%, 12/1/29 |
621,322 | |||||||||
1,250 |
Parma, (Parma Community General Hospital Association), Prerefunded to 11/1/08, 5.35%, 11/1/18 |
1,280,012 | |||||||||
1,750 |
Parma, (Parma Community General Hospital Association), Prerefunded to 11/1/08, 5.375%, 11/1/29 |
1,792,193 | |||||||||
670 |
Richland County Hospital Facilities, (Medcentral Health Systems), Prerefunded to 11/15/10, 6.375%, 11/15/22 |
736,384 | |||||||||
$ | 8,196,437 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 0.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 100 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 97,498 | |||||||
$ | 97,498 | ||||||||||
Hospital 10.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 550 |
Cuyahoga County, (Cleveland Clinic Health System), 5.50%, 1/1/29 |
$ | 563,184 | |||||||
600 |
Erie County Hospital Facilities, (Firelands Regional Medical Center), 5.25%, 8/15/46 |
572,160 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Hospital (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 1,500 |
Erie County Hospital Facilities, (Firelands Regional Medical Center), 5.625%, 8/15/32 |
$ | 1,515,690 | |||||||
500 |
Miami County, (Upper Valley Medical Center), 5.25%, 5/15/26 |
489,185 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University Hospital Health Systems, Inc.), 4.75%, 1/15/46 |
860,220 | |||||||||
330 |
Richland County Hospital Facilities, (Medcentral Health Systems), 6.375%, 11/15/22 |
342,434 | |||||||||
$ | 4,342,873 | ||||||||||
Housing 9.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities), (AMT), 4.625%, 9/1/27 |
$ | 914,570 | |||||||
600 |
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities), (AMT), 5.00%, 9/1/31 |
572,964 | |||||||||
65 |
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities), (AMT), 5.00%, 9/1/36 |
60,891 | |||||||||
2,500 |
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Uptown Community Partners), (AMT), 5.25%, 4/20/48 |
2,365,400 | |||||||||
$ | 3,913,825 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 12.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,385 |
Cleveland Airport, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 5.375%, 9/15/27 |
$ | 1,002,048 | |||||||
1,300 |
Dayton Special Facilities Revenue, (Emery Air Freight), 5.625%, 2/1/18 |
1,327,703 | |||||||||
2,250 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT), 6.00%, 8/1/38 |
2,260,845 | |||||||||
225 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Allied Waste North America, Inc.), (AMT), 5.15%, 7/15/15 |
210,643 | |||||||||
$ | 4,801,239 | ||||||||||
Insured-Education 6.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 730 | Miami University, (AMBAC), 3.25%, 9/1/26 | $ | 592,870 | |||||||
1,500 | University of Akron, (FSA), Series A, 5.00%, 1/1/38 | 1,541,340 | |||||||||
500 | University of Akron, (FSA), Series B, 5.00%, 1/1/38 | 513,780 | |||||||||
$ | 2,647,990 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 11.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 2,000 |
Cleveland Public Power System, (MBIA), 0.00%, 11/15/38 |
$ | 395,800 | |||||||
2,000 |
Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (MBIA), 0.00%, 2/15/25 |
826,440 |
See notes to financial statements
32
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 3,000 |
Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (MBIA), 0.00%, 2/15/26 |
$ | 1,165,710 | |||||||
2,225 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, (Dayton Power & Light), (FGIC), 4.80%, 1/1/34 |
2,145,501 | |||||||||
$ | 4,533,451 | ||||||||||
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded 13.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 245 |
Cuyahoga County Hospital, (Cleveland Clinic), (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.125%, 1/1/29(3) |
$ | 248,376 | |||||||
1,595 |
Hamilton County, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 5.25%, 12/1/32 |
1,703,221 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Lima City School District, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 5.50%, 12/1/22 |
1,093,480 | |||||||||
495 |
Lima City School District, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 6.00%, 12/1/22 |
547,247 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Ohio Higher Educational Facilities, (University of Dayton), (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 5.50%, 12/1/30 |
1,083,290 | |||||||||
500 |
University of Cincinnati, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 6/1/11, 5.25%, 6/1/24 |
541,530 | |||||||||
$ | 5,217,144 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 13.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 600 |
Bowling Green City School District, (FSA), 5.00%, 12/1/34 |
$ | 617,526 | |||||||
200 | Brookfield Local School District, (FSA), 5.00%, 1/15/30 | 206,784 | |||||||||
2,455 |
Canal Winchester Local School District, (MBIA), 0.00%, 12/1/30 |
770,944 | |||||||||
500 |
Olmsted Falls City School District, (XLCA), 5.00%, 12/1/35 |
501,075 | |||||||||
1,000 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(1)(2) | 1,188,860 | |||||||||
1,200 | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | 1,284,840 | |||||||||
750 | St. Mary's School District, (FSA), 5.00%, 12/1/35 | 773,228 | |||||||||
$ | 5,343,257 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 7.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 255 |
Cuyahoga County, (Cleveland Clinic), (MBIA), 5.125%, 1/1/29 |
$ | 258,514 | |||||||
980 |
Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children's Hospital), (FGIC), 5.00%, 5/15/32 |
917,643 | |||||||||
1,500 |
Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children's Hospital), (FGIC), 5.125%, 5/15/28 |
1,448,175 | |||||||||
485 |
Lorain County, (Catholic Healthcare Partners), (FSA), Variable Rate, 14.358%, 2/1/29(1)(2) |
524,566 | |||||||||
$ | 3,148,898 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 4.2% |
|||||||||||
$ | 1,075 |
Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (Commonwealth Appropriation), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 6/1/24 |
$ | 1,160,387 | |||||||
500 |
Summit County, (Civic Theater Project), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/33 |
501,270 | |||||||||
$ | 1,661,657 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 5.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 405 |
Hamilton County, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 12/1/32 |
$ | 409,248 | |||||||
9,905 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 712,070 | |||||||||
1,690 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 225,260 | |||||||||
3,350 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 420,961 | |||||||||
2,100 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 248,073 | |||||||||
$ | 2,015,612 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 6.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 450 | Cleveland Airport System, (FSA), 5.00%, 1/1/31 | $ | 452,799 | |||||||
1,000 | Ohio Turnpike Commission, (FGIC), 5.50%, 2/15/24 | 1,120,110 | |||||||||
1,000 | Ohio Turnpike Commission, (FGIC), 5.50%, 2/15/26 | 1,118,490 | |||||||||
$ | 2,691,399 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 2.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 275 |
Marysville Wastewater Treatment System, (XLCA), 4.75%, 12/1/46 |
$ | 252,117 | |||||||
750 |
Marysville Wastewater Treatment System, (XLCA), 4.75%, 12/1/47 |
686,400 | |||||||||
$ | 938,517 | ||||||||||
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 3.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,230 |
Union County, (Pleasant Valley Joint Fire District), 6.125%, 12/1/19 |
$ | 1,253,801 | |||||||
$ | 1,253,801 | ||||||||||
Other Revenue 12.8% | |||||||||||
$ | 7,345 |
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 0.00%, 6/1/47 |
$ | 398,907 | |||||||
710 |
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 5.875%, 6/1/47 |
609,492 | |||||||||
3,000 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, 5.50%, 10/1/32(4) |
3,124,550 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Riversouth Authority, (Lazarus Building Redevelopment), 5.75%, 12/1/27 |
965,360 | |||||||||
$ | 5,098,309 |
See notes to financial statements
33
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Pooled Loans 13.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 530 |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, (Myers University), 5.60%, 5/15/25 |
$ | 520,603 | |||||||
550 |
Ohio Economic Development Commission, (Ohio Enterprise Bond Fund), (AMT), 4.85%, 6/1/25 |
560,725 | |||||||||
1,020 |
Ohio Economic Development Commission, (Ohio Enterprise Bond Fund), (AMT), 5.85%, 12/1/22 |
1,058,638 | |||||||||
1,245 |
Rickenbacker Port Authority, Oasbo Expanded Asset Pool Loan, 5.375%, 1/1/32(4) |
1,318,115 | |||||||||
325 |
Summit County Port Authority, (Twinsburg Township), 5.125%, 5/15/25 |
297,573 | |||||||||
750 | Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, 4.80%, 11/15/35 | 626,490 | |||||||||
1,100 | Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, 5.40%, 5/15/19 | 1,069,420 | |||||||||
$ | 5,451,564 | ||||||||||
Special Tax Revenue 5.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 600 |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, 7.00%, 12/1/18 |
$ | 637,554 | |||||||
1,400 |
Cuyahoga County Economic Development, (Shaker Square), 6.75%, 12/1/30 |
1,524,250 | |||||||||
$ | 2,161,804 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 162.5% (identified cost $64,579,583) |
$ | 64,985,835 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (3.7)% | $ | (1,496,648 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (58.8)% |
$ | (23,506,591 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 39,982,596 |
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
DRIVERS - Derivative Inverse Tax-Exempt Receipts
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Ohio municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 43.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various
financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.2% to 12.0% of total investments.
(1) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $2,187,369 or 5.5% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(2) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
(3) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
(4) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
See notes to financial statements
34
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments 168.6% |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Cogeneration 5.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 315 |
Carbon County Industrial Development Authority, (Panther Creek Partners), (AMT), 6.65%, 5/1/10 |
$ | 321,448 | |||||||
500 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.50%, 1/1/13 |
501,465 | |||||||||
500 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.60%, 1/1/19 |
500,085 | |||||||||
675 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Resource Recovery-Colver), (AMT), 5.125%, 12/1/15 |
645,421 | |||||||||
$ | 1,968,419 | ||||||||||
Electric Utilities 3.1% | |||||||||||
$ | 600 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Reliant Energy, Inc.), (AMT), 6.75%, 12/1/36 |
$ | 606,318 | |||||||
600 |
York County Industrial Development Authority, (Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.), 5.50%, 9/1/20 |
596,196 | |||||||||
$ | 1,202,514 | ||||||||||
Escrowed / Prerefunded 17.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 600 |
Allegheny County Industrial Development Authority, (Residential Resources, Inc.), Prerefunded to 9/1/11, 6.50%, 9/1/21 |
$ | 668,034 | |||||||
600 |
Bucks County Industrial Development Authority, (Pennswood), Prerefunded to 10/1/12, 6.00%, 10/1/27 |
674,658 | |||||||||
1,500 |
Chester County Health and Educational Facility Authority, (Devereux Foundation), Prerefunded to 11/1/09, 6.00%, 11/1/29 |
1,593,600 | |||||||||
500 |
Monroe County Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical Center), Prerefunded to 1/1/14, 6.00%, 1/1/43 |
568,205 | |||||||||
925 |
Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority, (Foulkeways at Gwynedd), Prerefunded to 11/15/09, 6.75%, 11/15/30 |
994,301 | |||||||||
1,500 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Drexel University), Prerefunded to 5/1/09, 6.00%, 5/1/29 |
1,554,720 | |||||||||
600 |
Philadelphia Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Chestnut Hill College), Prerefunded to 10/1/09, 6.00%, 10/1/29 |
640,206 | |||||||||
$ | 6,693,724 | ||||||||||
Health Care-Miscellaneous 0.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 100 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 97,498 | |||||||
$ | 97,498 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Hospital 10.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,250 |
Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), 5.25%, 7/1/32 |
$ | 1,254,337 | |||||||
1,500 |
Monroe County Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical Center), 5.25%, 1/1/43 |
1,368,450 | |||||||||
850 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (UPMC Health System), 6.00%, 1/15/31 |
900,668 | |||||||||
500 |
Washington County Hospital Authority, (Monongahela Hospital), 5.50%, 6/1/17 |
519,520 | |||||||||
$ | 4,042,975 | ||||||||||
Housing 14.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 520 |
Allegheny County Residential Finance Authority, (Single Family Mortgages), (AMT), 4.95%, 11/1/37 |
$ | 481,364 | |||||||
1,205 |
Allegheny County Residential Finance Authority, (Single Family Mortgages), (AMT), 5.00%, 5/1/35 |
1,130,459 | |||||||||
995 |
Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.70%, 10/1/37 |
882,834 | |||||||||
1,200 |
Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.875%, 4/1/26 |
1,146,876 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.90%, 10/1/37 |
932,290 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.15%, 10/1/37 |
961,900 | |||||||||
$ | 5,535,723 | ||||||||||
Industrial Development Revenue 7.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
New Morgan Industrial Development Authority, (Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.), (AMT), 6.50%, 4/1/19 |
$ | 494,025 | |||||||
1,000 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co.), (AMT), 5.375%, 3/1/31 |
1,043,580 | |||||||||
500 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.10%, 10/1/27 |
437,620 | |||||||||
1,550 |
Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 |
998,340 | |||||||||
$ | 2,973,565 | ||||||||||
Insured-Education 28.3% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
Lycoming County Authority, (Pennsylvania College of Technology), (AGC), 5.50%, 10/1/37 |
$ | 536,885 | |||||||
1,900 |
Lycoming County Authority, (Pennsylvania College of Technology), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 5/1/32(1) |
1,935,568 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Northampton County Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Lafayette College), (MBIA), 5.00%, 11/1/27 |
1,000,190 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Bryn Mawr College), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 12/1/29 |
1,014,420 |
See notes to financial statements
35
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Education (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 1,155 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Drexel University), (MBIA), 5.00%, 5/1/37 |
$ | 1,179,324 | |||||||
2,000 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (State System Higher Education), (FSA), 5.00%, 6/15/24 |
2,025,280 | |||||||||
1,000 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Temple University), (MBIA), 5.00%, 4/1/33 |
1,020,730 | |||||||||
500 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of the Sciences in Philadephia), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/1/37 |
514,720 | |||||||||
500 |
State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/27 |
522,495 | |||||||||
375 |
State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/29 |
389,445 | |||||||||
875 |
State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/32 |
903,788 | |||||||||
$ | 11,042,845 | ||||||||||
Insured-Electric Utilities 3.2% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,280 |
Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority, (PPL Electric Utilities Corp.), (FGIC), 4.75%, 2/15/27 |
$ | 1,258,112 | |||||||
$ | 1,258,112 | ||||||||||
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded 23.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 650 |
Berks County Municipal Authority, (Reading Hospital and Medical Center), (FSA), Prerefunded to 11/1/09, 6.00%, 11/1/29 |
$ | 697,724 | |||||||
2,600 |
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Oil Franchise Tax, (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 4.75%, 12/1/27(2) |
2,604,342 | |||||||||
1,801 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/10, 5.25%, 7/1/29(3) |
1,927,944 | |||||||||
2,500 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/10, 5.25%, 7/1/29(3) |
2,676,970 | |||||||||
2,000 |
Westmoreland Municipal Authority, (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/15/19 |
1,244,740 | |||||||||
$ | 9,151,720 | ||||||||||
Insured-General Obligations 3.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 9.90%, 7/1/27(4)(5) | $ | 1,188,860 | |||||||
$ | 1,188,860 | ||||||||||
Insured-Hospital 14.0% | |||||||||||
$ | 500 |
Delaware County, General Authority, (Catholic Health East), (AMBAC), 4.875%, 11/15/26 |
$ | 500,735 | |||||||
1,440 |
Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/35(6) |
1,439,417 |
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Insured-Hospital (continued) | |||||||||||
$ | 1,500 |
Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/29 |
$ | 1,531,215 | |||||||
2,000 |
Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority, (Abington Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/28 |
2,004,520 | |||||||||
$ | 5,475,887 | ||||||||||
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation 3.1% |
|||||||||||
$ | 1,195 |
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, (One Benjamin Franklin), (FSA), 4.75%, 2/15/27 |
$ | 1,201,381 | |||||||
$ | 1,201,381 | ||||||||||
Insured-Special Tax Revenue 6.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Public Auditorium Authority, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/1/24 |
$ | 1,017,990 | |||||||
9,870 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 709,554 | |||||||||
1,690 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 225,260 | |||||||||
3,350 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 420,961 | |||||||||
2,100 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 248,073 | |||||||||
$ | 2,621,838 | ||||||||||
Insured-Transportation 11.6% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 |
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/38 |
$ | 1,031,780 | |||||||
500 |
Philadelphia Airport Commission, (FSA), (AMT), 5.00%, 6/15/27 |
487,405 | |||||||||
1,005 |
Philadelphia Parking Authority, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 2/15/29 |
1,020,698 | |||||||||
1,800 |
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(3) |
1,968,525 | |||||||||
$ | 4,508,408 | ||||||||||
Insured-Water and Sewer 5.7% | |||||||||||
$ | 585 |
Chester County Industrial Development Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc.), (FGIC), (AMT), 5.00%, 2/1/40 |
$ | 547,121 | |||||||
875 |
Delaware County Industrial Development Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc.), (FGIC), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/36 |
823,191 | |||||||||
500 |
Delaware County Industrial Development Authority, (Water Facilities), (FGIC), (AMT), 6.00%, 6/1/29 |
505,715 | |||||||||
360 |
Philadelphia Water and Wastewater Revenue, (FGIC), 5.00%, 11/1/31 |
358,510 | |||||||||
$ | 2,234,537 |
See notes to financial statements
36
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2008
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Principal Amount (000's omitted) |
Security | Value | |||||||||
Senior Living / Life Care 5.4% | |||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Cliff House Trust, (AMT), 6.625%, 6/1/27(7) | $ | 644,120 | |||||||
500 |
Crawford County Hospital Authority, (Wesbury United Methodist Community), 6.25%, 8/15/29 |
479,290 | |||||||||
500 |
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, (Willow Valley Retirement Communities), 5.875%, 6/1/31 |
507,330 | |||||||||
200 |
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, (Foulkeways at Gwynedd), 5.00%, 12/1/24 |
187,286 | |||||||||
300 |
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, (Foulkeways at Gwynedd), 5.00%, 12/1/30 |
270,222 | |||||||||
$ | 2,088,248 | ||||||||||
Transportation 4.5% | |||||||||||
$ | 865 |
Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, 5.00%, 7/1/28 |
$ | 875,025 | |||||||
105 | Erie Municipal Airport Authority, (AMT), 5.50%, 7/1/09 | 105,780 | |||||||||
485 | Erie Municipal Airport Authority, (AMT), 5.875%, 7/1/16 | 485,121 | |||||||||
270 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Amtrak), (AMT), 6.25%, 11/1/31 |
271,982 | |||||||||
$ | 1,737,908 | ||||||||||
Water and Sewer 1.9% | |||||||||||
$ | 750 |
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc.), (AMT), 5.25%, 7/1/42 |
$ | 733,088 | |||||||
$ | 733,088 | ||||||||||
Total Tax-Exempt Investments 168.6% (identified cost $64,783,891) |
$ | 65,757,250 | |||||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities (10.9)% | $ | (4,245,272 | ) | ||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends (57.7)% |
$ | (22,507,977 | ) | ||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
$ | 39,004,001 |
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Pennsylvania municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at May 31, 2008, 58.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 3.0% to 20.5% of total investments.
(1) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities.
(3) Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.
(4) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the securities is $1,188,860 or 3.0% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.
(5) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at May 31, 2008.
(6) When-issued security.
(7) Security is in default with respect to scheduled principal payments.
See notes to financial statements
37
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
As of May 31, 2008
California Trust | Florida Plus Trust | Massachusetts Trust | Michigan Trust | ||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments | |||||||||||||||||||
Identified cost | $ | 171,153,242 | $ | 100,505,319 | $ | 62,486,566 | $ | 46,129,252 | |||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 32,657 | (1,124,920 | ) | (752,332 | ) | (48,057 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investments, at value | $ | 171,185,899 | $ | 99,380,399 | $ | 61,734,234 | $ | 46,081,195 | |||||||||||
Cash | $ | 844,669 | $ | 606,105 | $ | 148,428 | $ | 1,396,352 | |||||||||||
Receivable for investments sold | 9,000 | 1,480,334 | | | |||||||||||||||
Interest receivable | 2,105,694 | 1,038,633 | 1,096,334 | 667,360 | |||||||||||||||
Receivable for open interest rate swap contracts | 328,999 | 191,608 | 120,962 | 13,143 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 174,474,261 | $ | 102,697,079 | $ | 63,099,958 | $ | 48,158,050 | |||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Payable for floating rate notes issued | $ | 11,160,000 | $ | 5,175,000 | $ | 2,410,000 | $ | 1,125,000 | |||||||||||
Interest expense and fees payable | 82,275 | 30,946 | 15,384 | 12,465 | |||||||||||||||
Payable for investments purchased | | 1,930,341 | | | |||||||||||||||
Payable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts | 62,390 | 30,937 | | 6,187 | |||||||||||||||
Payable for open interest rate swap contracts | 113,328 | 66,016 | 40,710 | 12,103 | |||||||||||||||
Payable for when-issued securities | | | 318,470 | | |||||||||||||||
Payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee | 96,335 | 56,509 | 35,648 | 27,864 | |||||||||||||||
Payable to affiliate for administration fee | 27,524 | 16,145 | 10,185 | 7,961 | |||||||||||||||
Payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees | 67 | | | 407 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 62,650 | 54,435 | 51,300 | 65,486 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 11,604,569 | $ | 7,360,329 | $ | 2,881,697 | $ | 1,257,473 | |||||||||||
Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends | $ | 59,004,012 | $ | 35,507,238 | $ | 21,507,623 | $ | 17,503,568 | |||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | $ | 103,865,680 | $ | 59,829,512 | $ | 38,710,638 | $ | 29,397,009 | |||||||||||
Sources of Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized | $ | 71,815 | $ | 42,574 | $ | 27,141 | $ | 21,163 | |||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 106,450,842 | 63,254,539 | 40,196,540 | 31,450,960 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss (computed on the basis of identified cost) | (3,296,895 | ) | (2,583,935 | ) | (1,139,368 | ) | (2,161,623 | ) | |||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | 483,407 | 161,191 | 298,405 | 137,974 | |||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) (computed on the basis of identified cost) | 156,511 | (1,044,857 | ) | (672,080 | ) | (51,465 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | $ | 103,865,680 | $ | 59,829,512 | $ | 38,710,638 | $ | 29,397,009 | |||||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding (Liquidation preference of $25,000 per share) |
|||||||||||||||||||
2,360 | 1,420 | 860 | 700 | ||||||||||||||||
Common Shares Outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||
7,181,488 | 4,257,408 | 2,714,063 | 2,116,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Per Common Share | |||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued and outstanding | $ | 14.46 | $ | 14.05 | $ | 14.26 | $ | 13.89 |
See notes to financial statements
38
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
As of May 31, 2008
New Jersey Trust | New York Trust | Ohio Trust | Pennsylvania Trust | ||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments | |||||||||||||||||||
Identified cost | $ | 114,711,584 | $ | 135,404,347 | $ | 64,579,583 | $ | 64,783,891 | |||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (1,237,230 | ) | (25,250 | ) | 406,252 | 973,359 | |||||||||||||
Investments, at value | $ | 113,474,354 | $ | 135,379,097 | $ | 64,985,835 | $ | 65,757,250 | |||||||||||
Cash | $ | 146,593 | $ | | $ | 376,802 | $ | 579,272 | |||||||||||
Receivable for investments sold | 311,831 | | | 5,039 | |||||||||||||||
Interest receivable | 1,824,107 | 1,769,484 | 1,049,474 | 1,045,780 | |||||||||||||||
Receivable for open interest rate swap contracts | 210,913 | 249,727 | 81,121 | 44,978 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 115,967,798 | $ | 137,398,308 | $ | 66,493,232 | $ | 67,432,319 | |||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Payable for floating rate notes issued | $ | 11,742,000 | $ | 13,590,000 | $ | 2,830,000 | $ | 4,215,780 | |||||||||||
Interest expense and fees payable | 155,119 | 105,214 | 17,822 | 76,117 | |||||||||||||||
Payable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | 65,484 | 13,406 | 48,984 | |||||||||||||||
Payable for open interest rate swap contracts | 72,618 | 84,721 | 44,011 | 40,710 | |||||||||||||||
Payable for when-issued securities | | | | 1,440,000 | |||||||||||||||
Due to custodian | | 172,349 | | | |||||||||||||||
Payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee | 61,527 | 72,777 | 37,617 | 36,327 | |||||||||||||||
Payable to affiliate for administration fee | 17,579 | 20,793 | 10,748 | 10,379 | |||||||||||||||
Payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees | 36 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 52,605 | 57,840 | 50,441 | 52,044 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 12,101,484 | $ | 14,169,178 | $ | 3,004,045 | $ | 5,920,341 | |||||||||||
Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends | $ | 38,000,000 | $ | 44,506,046 | $ | 23,506,591 | $ | 22,507,977 | |||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | $ | 65,866,314 | $ | 78,723,084 | $ | 39,982,596 | $ | 39,004,001 | |||||||||||
Sources of Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized | $ | 46,215 | $ | 53,753 | $ | 28,293 | $ | 27,085 | |||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 68,598,222 | 79,783,608 | 42,034,341 | 39,802,504 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss (computed on the basis of identified cost) | (2,198,422 | ) | (1,715,536 | ) | (2,771,420 | ) | (1,951,396 | ) | |||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | 519,234 | 419,737 | 257,658 | 220,269 | |||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) (computed on the basis of identified cost) | (1,098,935 | ) | 181,522 | 433,724 | 905,539 | ||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | $ | 65,866,314 | $ | 78,723,084 | $ | 39,982,596 | $ | 39,004,001 | |||||||||||
Auction Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding (Liquidation preference of $25,000 per share) |
|||||||||||||||||||
1,520 | 1,780 | 940 | 900 | ||||||||||||||||
Common Shares Outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||
4,621,485 | 5,375,346 | 2,829,304 | 2,708,462 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Per Common Share | |||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued and outstanding | $ | 14.25 | $ | 14.65 | $ | 14.13 | $ | 14.40 |
See notes to financial statements
39
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Statements of Operations
For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2008
California Trust | Florida Plus Trust | Massachusetts Trust | Michigan Trust | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 4,487,577 | $ | 2,753,662 | $ | 1,712,553 | $ | 1,327,374 | |||||||||||
Total investment income | $ | 4,487,577 | $ | 2,753,662 | $ | 1,712,553 | $ | 1,327,374 | |||||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment adviser fee | $ | 570,203 | $ | 334,629 | $ | 210,602 | $ | 165,361 | |||||||||||
Administration fee | 162,915 | 95,608 | 60,172 | 47,246 | |||||||||||||||
Trustees' fees and expenses | 2,899 | 1,821 | 547 | 960 | |||||||||||||||
Legal and accounting services | 19,677 | 135,162 | 16,532 | 13,025 | |||||||||||||||
Printing and postage | 11,215 | 8,418 | 5,807 | 16,075 | |||||||||||||||
Custodian fee | 40,136 | 32,249 | 24,165 | 19,555 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense and fees | 115,126 | 133,179 | 41,897 | 25,367 | |||||||||||||||
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | 16,272 | 16,472 | 13,867 | 17,105 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred shares remarketing agent fee | 75,432 | 44,396 | 26,949 | 21,885 | |||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous | 31,624 | 23,931 | 21,072 | 25,131 | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses | $ | 1,045,499 | $ | 825,865 | $ | 421,610 | $ | 351,710 | |||||||||||
Deduct | |||||||||||||||||||
Reduction of custodian fee | 7,963 | 9,956 | 2,793 | 2,690 | |||||||||||||||
Total expense reductions | $ | 7,963 | $ | 9,956 | $ | 2,793 | $ | 2,690 | |||||||||||
Net expenses | $ | 1,037,536 | $ | 815,909 | $ | 418,817 | $ | 349,020 | |||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 3,450,041 | $ | 1,937,753 | $ | 1,293,736 | $ | 978,354 | |||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment transactions (identified cost basis) | $ | (269,720 | ) | $ | 212,771 | $ | 54,481 | $ | 93,116 | ||||||||||
Financial futures contracts | 408,703 | 233,522 | | 84,582 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts | (555,304 | ) | (323,419 | ) | (268,740 | ) | (32,545 | ) | |||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) | $ | (416,321 | ) | $ | 122,874 | $ | (214,259 | ) | $ | 145,153 | |||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments (identified cost basis) | $ | (5,173,421 | ) | $ | (3,504,173 | ) | $ | (1,867,671 | ) | $ | (1,524,411 | ) | |||||||
Financial futures contracts | (76,592 | ) | (40,168 | ) | | (4,448 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts | 951,495 | 554,168 | 411,641 | 51,831 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $ | (4,298,518 | ) | $ | (2,990,173 | ) | $ | (1,456,030 | ) | $ | (1,477,028 | ) | |||||||
Net realized and unrealized loss | $ | (4,714,839 | ) | $ | (2,867,299 | ) | $ | (1,670,289 | ) | $ | (1,331,875 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
$ | (1,045,197 | ) | $ | (644,101 | ) | $ | (387,109 | ) | $ | (318,578 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (2,309,995 | ) | $ | (1,573,647 | ) | $ | (763,662 | ) | $ | (672,099 | ) |
See notes to financial statements
40
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Statements of Operations
For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2008
New Jersey Trust | New York Trust | Ohio Trust | Pennsylvania Trust | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 2,996,399 | $ | 3,631,135 | $ | 1,825,741 | $ | 1,790,216 | |||||||||||
Total investment income | $ | 2,996,399 | $ | 3,631,135 | $ | 1,825,741 | $ | 1,790,216 | |||||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment adviser fee | $ | 364,469 | $ | 431,038 | $ | 223,558 | $ | 215,410 | |||||||||||
Administration fee | 104,134 | 123,154 | 63,874 | 61,546 | |||||||||||||||
Trustees' fees and expenses | 2,202 | 1,821 | 453 | 433 | |||||||||||||||
Legal and accounting services | 16,426 | 17,220 | 14,287 | 14,050 | |||||||||||||||
Printing and postage | 7,050 | 6,121 | 6,095 | 1,078 | |||||||||||||||
Custodian fee | 44,980 | 47,372 | 29,427 | 26,370 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense and fees | 150,706 | 202,451 | 64,483 | 78,741 | |||||||||||||||
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | 15,663 | 15,654 | 14,367 | 16,843 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred shares remarketing agent fee | 47,521 | 55,650 | 31,652 | 28,237 | |||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous | 21,071 | 21,946 | 20,823 | 24,200 | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses | $ | 774,222 | $ | 922,427 | $ | 469,019 | $ | 466,908 | |||||||||||
Deduct | |||||||||||||||||||
Reduction of custodian fee | 9,227 | 10,782 | 4,653 | 4,798 | |||||||||||||||
Total expense reductions | $ | 9,227 | $ | 10,782 | $ | 4,653 | $ | 4,798 | |||||||||||
Net expenses | $ | 764,995 | $ | 911,645 | $ | 464,366 | $ | 462,110 | |||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 2,231,404 | $ | 2,719,490 | $ | 1,361,375 | $ | 1,328,106 | |||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment transactions (identified cost basis) | $ | 536,169 | $ | 772,133 | $ | 82,580 | $ | 285,236 | |||||||||||
Financial futures contracts | | 333,480 | 148,165 | 349,425 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts | (471,948 | ) | (423,089 | ) | (101,704 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain | $ | 64,221 | $ | 682,524 | $ | 129,041 | $ | 634,661 | |||||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments (identified cost basis) | $ | (4,070,760 | ) | $ | (4,649,567 | ) | $ | (2,369,117 | ) | $ | (1,872,868 | ) | |||||||
Financial futures contracts | | 7,706 | (13,423 | ) | (89,367 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts | 722,103 | 722,661 | 216,312 | 84,178 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $ | (3,348,657 | ) | $ | (3,919,200 | ) | $ | (2,166,228 | ) | $ | (1,878,057 | ) | |||||||
Net realized and unrealized loss | $ | (3,284,436 | ) | $ | (3,236,676 | ) | $ | (2,037,187 | ) | $ | (1,243,396 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
$ | (671,906 | ) | $ | (785,678 | ) | $ | (430,491 | ) | $ | (402,720 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (1,724,938 | ) | $ | (1,302,864 | ) | $ | (1,106,303 | ) | $ | (318,010 | ) |
See notes to financial statements
41
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2008
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | California Trust | Florida Plus Trust | Massachusetts Trust | Michigan Trust | |||||||||||||||
From operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 3,450,041 | $ | 1,937,753 | $ | 1,293,736 | $ | 978,354 | |||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
(416,321 | ) | 122,874 | (214,259 | ) | 145,153 | |||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
(4,298,518 | ) | (2,990,173 | ) | (1,456,030 | ) | (1,477,028 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(1,045,197 | ) | (644,101 | ) | (387,109 | ) | (318,578 | ) | |||||||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (2,309,995 | ) | $ | (1,573,647 | ) | $ | (763,662 | ) | $ | (672,099 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (2,391,565 | ) | $ | (1,353,856 | ) | $ | (867,143 | ) | $ | (641,237 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (2,391,565 | ) | $ | (1,353,856 | ) | $ | (867,143 | ) | $ | (641,237 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in net assets | $ | (4,701,560 | ) | $ | (2,927,503 | ) | $ | (1,630,805 | ) | $ | (1,313,336 | ) | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
At beginning of period | $ | 108,567,240 | $ | 62,757,015 | $ | 40,341,443 | $ | 30,710,345 | |||||||||||
At end of period | $ | 103,865,680 | $ | 59,829,512 | $ | 38,710,638 | $ | 29,397,009 | |||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets applicable to common shares |
|||||||||||||||||||
At end of period | $ | 483,407 | $ | 161,191 | $ | 298,405 | $ | 137,974 |
See notes to financial statements
42
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2008
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | New Jersey Trust | New York Trust | Ohio Trust | Pennsylvania Trust | |||||||||||||||
From operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 2,231,404 | $ | 2,719,490 | $ | 1,361,375 | $ | 1,328,106 | |||||||||||
Net realized gain from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
64,221 | 682,524 | 129,041 | 634,661 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
(3,348,657 | ) | (3,919,200 | ) | (2,166,228 | ) | (1,878,057 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(671,906 | ) | (785,678 | ) | (430,491 | ) | (402,720 | ) | |||||||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (1,724,938 | ) | $ | (1,302,864 | ) | $ | (1,106,303 | ) | $ | (318,010 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (1,409,571 | ) | $ | (1,905,549 | ) | $ | (864,375 | ) | $ | (859,926 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (1,409,571 | ) | $ | (1,905,549 | ) | $ | (864,375 | ) | $ | (859,926 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in net assets | $ | (3,134,509 | ) | $ | (3,208,413 | ) | $ | (1,970,678 | ) | $ | (1,177,936 | ) | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
At beginning of period | $ | 69,000,823 | $ | 81,931,497 | $ | 41,953,274 | $ | 40,181,937 | |||||||||||
At end of period | $ | 65,866,314 | $ | 78,723,084 | $ | 39,982,596 | $ | 39,004,001 | |||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets applicable to common shares |
|||||||||||||||||||
At end of period | $ | 519,234 | $ | 419,737 | $ | 257,658 | $ | 220,269 |
See notes to financial statements
43
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the Year Ended November 30, 2007
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | California Trust | Florida Plus Trust | Massachusetts Trust | Michigan Trust | |||||||||||||||
From operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 6,721,579 | $ | 4,018,334 | $ | 2,481,917 | $ | 1,932,321 | |||||||||||
Net realized gain from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
1,212,305 | 806,170 | 1,482,005 | 612,556 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
(10,493,249 | ) | (5,256,087 | ) | (5,028,194 | ) | (2,484,463 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(2,014,092 | ) | (1,305,923 | ) | (734,875 | ) | (625,544 | ) | |||||||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (4,573,457 | ) | $ | (1,737,506 | ) | $ | (1,799,147 | ) | $ | (565,130 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (4,825,005 | ) | $ | (2,757,391 | ) | $ | (1,734,298 | ) | $ | (1,367,125 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (4,825,005 | ) | $ | (2,757,391 | ) | $ | (1,734,298 | ) | $ | (1,367,125 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in net assets | $ | (9,398,462 | ) | $ | (4,494,897 | ) | $ | (3,533,445 | ) | $ | (1,932,255 | ) | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
At beginning of year | $ | 117,965,702 | $ | 67,251,912 | $ | 43,874,888 | $ | 32,642,600 | |||||||||||
At end of year | $ | 108,567,240 | $ | 62,757,015 | $ | 40,341,443 | $ | 30,710,345 | |||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets applicable to common shares |
|||||||||||||||||||
At end of year | $ | 470,128 | $ | 221,395 | $ | 258,921 | $ | 119,435 |
See notes to financial statements
44
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the Year Ended November 30, 2007
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | New Jersey Trust | New York Trust | Ohio Trust | Pennsylvania Trust | |||||||||||||||
From operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 4,281,160 | $ | 5,325,083 | $ | 2,652,615 | $ | 2,581,747 | |||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
2,245,358 | 985,195 | 1,008,079 | (79,473 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and interest rate swap contracts |
(8,114,677 | ) | (7,930,136 | ) | (3,397,293 | ) | (1,711,887 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(1,262,219 | ) | (1,544,549 | ) | (839,516 | ) | (813,684 | ) | |||||||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (2,850,378 | ) | $ | (3,164,407 | ) | $ | (576,115 | ) | $ | (23,297 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (2,994,385 | ) | $ | (3,873,823 | ) | $ | (1,856,075 | ) | $ | (1,793,216 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (2,994,385 | ) | $ | (3,873,823 | ) | $ | (1,856,075 | ) | $ | (1,793,216 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in net assets | $ | (5,844,763 | ) | $ | (7,038,230 | ) | $ | (2,432,190 | ) | $ | (1,816,513 | ) | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
At beginning of year | $ | 74,845,586 | $ | 88,969,727 | $ | 44,385,464 | $ | 41,998,450 | |||||||||||
At end of year | $ | 69,000,823 | $ | 81,931,497 | $ | 41,953,274 | $ | 40,181,937 | |||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets applicable to common shares |
|||||||||||||||||||
At end of year | $ | 369,307 | $ | 391,474 | $ | 191,149 | $ | 154,809 |
See notes to financial statements
45
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
California Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 15.120 | $ | 16.430 | $ | 15.420 | $ | 15.070 | $ | 15.320 | $ | 14.590 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.480 | $ | 0.936 | $ | 0.962 | $ | 1.013 | $ | 1.079 | $ | 1.079 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.661 | ) | (1.294 | ) | 1.028 | 0.383 | (0.227 | ) | 0.682 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.146 | ) | (0.280 | ) | (0.239 | ) | (0.154 | ) | (0.079 | ) | (0.068 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.327 | ) | $ | (0.638 | ) | $ | 1.751 | $ | 1.242 | $ | 0.773 | $ | 1.693 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.333 | ) | $ | (0.672 | ) | $ | (0.741 | ) | $ | (0.892 | ) | $ | (1.023 | ) | $ | (0.963 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.333 | ) | $ | (0.672 | ) | $ | (0.741 | ) | $ | (0.892 | ) | $ | (1.023 | ) | $ | (0.963 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.460 | $ | 15.120 | $ | 16.430 | $ | 15.420 | $ | 15.070 | $ | 15.320 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 13.700 | $ | 13.160 | $ | 15.050 | $ | 13.650 | $ | 15.160 | $ | 14.950 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (1.60 | )%(9) | (3.65 | )% | 12.10 | % | 8.72 | % | 5.35 | % | 12.31 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 7.10 | %(9) | (8.44 | )% | 15.99 | % | (4.34 | )% | 8.60 | % | 17.06 | % |
46
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
California Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 103,866 | $ | 108,567 | $ | 117,966 | $ | 110,760 | $ | 108,193 | $ | 109,991 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.79 | %(4) | 1.78 | %(5) | 1.79 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.78 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.22 | %(4) | 0.34 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.23 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.01 | %(4) | 2.12 | %(5) | 2.28 | % | 2.11 | % | 1.98 | % | 2.01 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.78 | %(4) | 1.76 | %(5) | 1.77 | % | 1.76 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.78 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.64 | %(4) | 5.94 | % | 6.12 | % | 6.52 | % | 7.10 | % | 7.17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 16 | %(9) | 40 | % | 26 | % | 31 | % | 17 | % | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.14 | %(4) | 1.17 | %(5) | 1.18 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.14 | %(4) | 0.22 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.28 | %(4) | 1.39 | %(5) | 1.50 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.30 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.13 | %(4) | 1.16 | %(5) | 1.16 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.24 | %(4) | 3.90 | % | 4.03 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.61 | % | 4.64 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 2,360 | 2,360 | 2,360 | 2,360 | 2,360 | 2,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 69,013 | $ | 71,003 | $ | 74,997 | $ | 71,942 | $ | 70,849 | $ | 71,608 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
47
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Florida Plus Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.740 | $ | 15.800 | $ | 15.150 | $ | 15.040 | $ | 15.530 | $ | 14.730 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.455 | $ | 0.944 | $ | 0.970 | $ | 1.013 | $ | 1.082 | $ | 1.096 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.676 | ) | (1.049 | ) | 0.678 | 0.179 | (0.450 | ) | 0.775 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.151 | ) | (0.307 | ) | (0.270 | ) | (0.177 | ) | (0.087 | ) | (0.076 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.372 | ) | $ | (0.412 | ) | $ | 1.378 | $ | 1.015 | $ | 0.545 | $ | 1.795 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.318 | ) | $ | (0.648 | ) | $ | (0.728 | ) | $ | (0.905 | ) | $ | (1.035 | ) | $ | (0.995 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.318 | ) | $ | (0.648 | ) | $ | (0.728 | ) | $ | (0.905 | ) | $ | (1.035 | ) | $ | (0.995 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.050 | $ | 14.740 | $ | 15.800 | $ | 15.150 | $ | 15.040 | $ | 15.530 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 12.580 | $ | 12.720 | $ | 14.180 | $ | 14.180 | $ | 15.250 | $ | 15.455 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (2.23 | )%(9) | (2.26 | )% | 9.84 | % | 6.98 | % | 3.80 | % | 12.65 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 1.44 | %(9) | (6.02 | )% | 5.32 | % | (1.25 | )% | 5.76 | % | 14.67 | % |
See notes to financial statements
48
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Florida Plus Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 59,830 | $ | 62,757 | $ | 67,252 | $ | 64,501 | $ | 63,911 | $ | 65,902 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 2.30 | %(4) | 1.87 | %(5) | 1.87 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.84 | % | 1.83 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.44 | %(4) | 0.75 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.58 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.74 | %(4) | 2.62 | %(5) | 2.41 | % | 2.28 | % | 2.34 | % | 2.41 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 2.27 | %(4) | 1.86 | %(5) | 1.86 | % | 1.85 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.82 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.45 | %(4) | 6.16 | % | 6.33 | % | 6.65 | % | 7.09 | % | 7.20 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 73 | %(9) | 26 | % | 33 | % | 15 | % | 4 | % | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.45 | %(4) | 1.21 | %(5) | 1.21 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.28 | %(4) | 0.48 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.37 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.73 | %(4) | 1.69 | %(5) | 1.56 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.55 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.43 | %(4) | 1.20 | %(5) | 1.20 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.05 | %(4) | 3.99 | % | 4.10 | % | 4.30 | % | 4.58 | % | 4.64 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 1,420 | 1,420 | 1,420 | 1,420 | 1,420 | 1,420 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 67,139 | $ | 69,201 | $ | 72,363 | $ | 70,423 | $ | 70,011 | $ | 71,412 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
49
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Massachusetts Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.860 | $ | 16.170 | $ | 15.270 | $ | 15.090 | $ | 15.380 | $ | 14.350 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.477 | $ | 0.914 | $ | 0.931 | $ | 0.973 | $ | 1.054 | $ | 1.091 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.614 | ) | (1.314 | ) | 0.926 | 0.234 | (0.251 | ) | 0.982 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.143 | ) | (0.271 | ) | (0.243 | ) | (0.145 | ) | (0.070 | ) | (0.070 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.280 | ) | $ | (0.671 | ) | $ | 1.614 | $ | 1.062 | $ | 0.733 | $ | 2.003 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.320 | ) | $ | (0.639 | ) | $ | (0.714 | ) | $ | (0.882 | ) | $ | (1.023 | ) | $ | (0.973 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.320 | ) | $ | (0.639 | ) | $ | (0.714 | ) | $ | (0.882 | ) | $ | (1.023 | ) | $ | (0.973 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.260 | $ | 14.860 | $ | 16.170 | $ | 15.270 | $ | 15.090 | $ | 15.380 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 13.900 | $ | 13.050 | $ | 14.920 | $ | 14.800 | $ | 16.810 | $ | 15.400 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (1.69 | )%(9) | (3.94 | )% | 11.05 | % | 7.02 | % | 4.90 | % | 14.33 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 9.11 | %(9) | (8.57 | )% | 5.72 | % | (6.89 | )% | 16.71 | % | 5.91 | % |
See notes to financial statements
50
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Massachusetts Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 38,711 | $ | 40,341 | $ | 43,875 | $ | 41,395 | $ | 40,662 | $ | 41,035 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.96 | %(4) | 1.91 | %(5) | 1.88 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.87 | % | 1.86 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.22 | %(4) | 0.61 | % | 0.77 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.34 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.18 | %(4) | 2.52 | %(5) | 2.65 | % | 2.40 | % | 2.17 | % | 2.20 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.95 | %(4) | 1.89 | %(5) | 1.87 | % | 1.87 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.86 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.69 | %(4) | 5.90 | % | 6.01 | % | 6.29 | % | 6.97 | % | 7.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 11 | %(9) | 42 | % | 22 | % | 13 | % | 39 | % | 26 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.26 | %(4) | 1.26 | %(5) | 1.24 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.14 | %(4) | 0.40 | % | 0.51 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.22 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.40 | %(4) | 1.66 | %(5) | 1.75 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.43 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.25 | %(4) | 1.25 | %(5) | 1.24 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.30 | %(4) | 3.91 | % | 3.98 | % | 4.15 | % | 4.55 | % | 4.72 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 860 | 860 | 860 | 860 | 860 | 860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 70,021 | $ | 71,920 | $ | 76,024 | $ | 73,138 | $ | 72,281 | $ | 72,719 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
51
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Michigan Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.510 | $ | 15.420 | $ | 14.820 | $ | 14.860 | $ | 15.240 | $ | 14.400 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.462 | $ | 0.913 | $ | 0.950 | $ | 0.995 | $ | 1.072 | $ | 1.092 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.628 | ) | (0.881 | ) | 0.608 | 0.010 | (0.334 | ) | 0.802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.151 | ) | (0.296 | ) | (0.256 | ) | (0.172 | ) | (0.086 | ) | (0.072 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.317 | ) | $ | (0.264 | ) | $ | 1.302 | $ | 0.833 | $ | 0.652 | $ | 1.822 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.303 | ) | $ | (0.646 | ) | $ | (0.702 | ) | $ | (0.873 | ) | $ | (1.032 | ) | $ | (0.982 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.303 | ) | $ | (0.646 | ) | $ | (0.702 | ) | $ | (0.873 | ) | $ | (1.032 | ) | $ | (0.982 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 13.890 | $ | 14.510 | $ | 15.420 | $ | 14.820 | $ | 14.860 | $ | 15.240 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 12.330 | $ | 12.430 | $ | 14.110 | $ | 13.500 | $ | 16.600 | $ | 15.635 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (1.90 | )%(9) | (1.37 | )% | 9.38 | % | 5.62 | % | 4.36 | % | 13.07 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 1.66 | %(9) | (7.66 | )% | 9.88 | % | (13.87 | )% | 13.63 | % | 19.82 | % |
See notes to financial statements
52
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Michigan Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 29,397 | $ | 30,710 | $ | 32,643 | $ | 31,357 | $ | 31,363 | $ | 31,963 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 2.20 | %(4) | 2.03 | %(5) | 1.97 | % | 2.00 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.97 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.17 | %(4) | 0.32 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.43 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.37 | %(4) | 2.35 | %(5) | 2.43 | % | 2.40 | % | 2.38 | % | 2.40 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 2.18 | %(4) | 2.01 | %(5) | 1.96 | % | 1.99 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.97 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.58 | %(4) | 6.12 | % | 6.35 | % | 6.60 | % | 7.16 | % | 7.31 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 4 | %(9) | 22 | % | 22 | % | 14 | % | 5 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.38 | %(4) | 1.31 | %(5) | 1.27 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.11 | %(4) | 0.21 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.49 | %(4) | 1.52 | %(5) | 1.56 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.53 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.37 | %(4) | 1.29 | %(5) | 1.26 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.14 | %(4) | 3.94 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.60 | % | 4.69 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 67,001 | $ | 68,878 | $ | 71,635 | $ | 69,796 | $ | 69,810 | $ | 70,664 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
53
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
New Jersey Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.930 | $ | 16.200 | $ | 15.020 | $ | 14.810 | $ | 15.190 | $ | 14.060 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.483 | $ | 0.926 | $ | 0.953 | $ | 1.014 | $ | 1.082 | $ | 1.120 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.713 | ) | (1.275 | ) | 1.205 | 0.238 | (0.313 | ) | 1.099 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.145 | ) | (0.273 | ) | (0.253 | ) | (0.169 | ) | (0.081 | ) | (0.071 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.375 | ) | $ | (0.622 | ) | $ | 1.905 | $ | 1.083 | $ | 0.688 | $ | 2.148 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.305 | ) | $ | (0.648 | ) | $ | (0.725 | ) | $ | (0.873 | ) | $ | (1.068 | ) | $ | (1.018 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.305 | ) | $ | (0.648 | ) | $ | (0.725 | ) | $ | (0.873 | ) | $ | (1.068 | ) | $ | (1.018 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.250 | $ | 14.930 | $ | 16.200 | $ | 15.020 | $ | 14.810 | $ | 15.190 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 12.910 | $ | 12.790 | $ | 15.080 | $ | 14.030 | $ | 15.540 | $ | 15.415 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (2.27 | )%(9) | (3.59 | )% | 13.28 | % | 7.59 | % | 4.76 | % | 15.81 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 3.36 | %(9) | (11.28 | )% | 12.89 | % | (4.22 | )% | 8.31 | % | 14.75 | % |
See notes to financial statements
54
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
New Jersey Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 65,866 | $ | 69,001 | $ | 74,846 | $ | 69,375 | $ | 68,298 | $ | 69,500 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.89 | %(4) | 1.84 | %(5) | 1.85 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.85 | % | 1.84 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.46 | %(4) | 0.89 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.43 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.35 | %(4) | 2.73 | %(5) | 2.78 | % | 2.44 | % | 2.35 | % | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.86 | %(4) | 1.81 | %(5) | 1.83 | % | 1.84 | % | 1.84 | % | 1.84 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.75 | %(4) | 5.94 | % | 6.20 | % | 6.66 | % | 7.28 | % | 7.64 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 28 | %(9) | 42 | % | 23 | % | 46 | % | 52 | % | 28 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.20 | %(4) | 1.21 | %(5) | 1.20 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.29 | %(4) | 0.58 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.49 | %(4) | 1.79 | %(5) | 1.81 | % | 1.59 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.45 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.18 | %(4) | 1.19 | %(5) | 1.19 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.29 | %(4) | 3.89 | % | 4.04 | % | 4.33 | % | 4.68 | % | 4.87 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 1,520 | 1,520 | 1,520 | 1,520 | 1,520 | 1,520 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 68,333 | $ | 70,395 | $ | 74,250 | $ | 70,651 | $ | 69,935 | $ | 70,724 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
55
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
New York Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 15.240 | $ | 16.550 | $ | 15.660 | $ | 15.490 | $ | 15.810 | $ | 14.860 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.506 | $ | 0.991 | $ | 0.987 | $ | 1.070 | $ | 1.126 | $ | 1.108 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.596 | ) | (1.293 | ) | 0.932 | 0.243 | (0.332 | ) | 0.936 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.146 | ) | (0.287 | ) | (0.247 | ) | (0.163 | ) | (0.074 | ) | (0.068 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.236 | ) | $ | (0.589 | ) | $ | 1.672 | $ | 1.150 | $ | 0.720 | $ | 1.976 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.354 | ) | $ | (0.721 | ) | $ | (0.782 | ) | $ | (0.980 | ) | $ | (1.040 | ) | $ | (1.026 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.354 | ) | $ | (0.721 | ) | $ | (0.782 | ) | $ | (0.980 | ) | $ | (1.040 | ) | $ | (1.026 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.650 | $ | 15.240 | $ | 16.550 | $ | 15.660 | $ | 15.490 | $ | 15.810 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.400 | $ | 14.100 | $ | 15.700 | $ | 14.990 | $ | 15.370 | $ | 15.460 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (1.39 | )%(9) | (3.42 | )% | 11.28 | % | 7.61 | % | 4.91 | % | 13.94 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 4.77 | %(9) | (5.81 | )% | 10.28 | % | 3.81 | % | 6.46 | % | 18.34 | % |
See notes to financial statements
56
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
New York Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 78,723 | $ | 81,931 | $ | 88,970 | $ | 84,194 | $ | 83,044 | $ | 84,744 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.83 | %(4) | 1.80 | %(5) | 1.82 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.77 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.51 | %(4) | 0.98 | % | 1.03 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.40 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.34 | %(4) | 2.78 | %(5) | 2.85 | % | 2.38 | % | 2.10 | % | 2.17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.80 | %(4) | 1.78 | %(5) | 1.80 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.77 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.91 | %(4) | 6.23 | % | 6.22 | % | 6.72 | % | 7.23 | % | 7.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 20 | %(9) | 29 | % | 27 | % | 40 | % | 31 | % | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.17 | %(4) | 1.18 | %(5) | 1.19 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.33 | %(4) | 0.65 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.50 | %(4) | 1.83 | %(5) | 1.87 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.41 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.15 | %(4) | 1.17 | %(5) | 1.19 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.42 | %(4) | 4.10 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.42 | % | 4.71 | % | 4.68 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 1,780 | 1,780 | 1,780 | 1,780 | 1,780 | 1,780 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 69,230 | $ | 71,032 | $ | 74,983 | $ | 72,311 | $ | 71,659 | $ | 72,603 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
57
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Ohio Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.830 | $ | 15.690 | $ | 14.910 | $ | 15.040 | $ | 15.070 | $ | 14.150 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.481 | $ | 0.938 | $ | 0.958 | $ | 1.003 | $ | 1.081 | $ | 1.083 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.723 | ) | (0.845 | ) | 0.800 | (0.055 | ) | (0.011 | ) | 0.913 | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.152 | ) | (0.297 | ) | (0.264 | ) | (0.175 | ) | (0.091 | ) | (0.077 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.394 | ) | $ | (0.204 | ) | $ | 1.494 | $ | 0.773 | $ | 0.979 | $ | 1.919 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.306 | ) | $ | (0.656 | ) | $ | (0.714 | ) | $ | (0.903 | ) | $ | (1.009 | ) | $ | (0.999 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.306 | ) | $ | (0.656 | ) | $ | (0.714 | ) | $ | (0.903 | ) | $ | (1.009 | ) | $ | (0.999 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.130 | $ | 14.830 | $ | 15.690 | $ | 14.910 | $ | 15.040 | $ | 15.070 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 12.790 | $ | 12.850 | $ | 14.610 | $ | 14.170 | $ | 16.750 | $ | 15.715 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (2.44 | )%(9) | (1.06 | )% | 10.50 | % | 5.10 | % | 6.71 | % | 13.92 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 1.92 | %(9) | (7.93 | )% | 8.27 | % | (10.31 | )% | 13.96 | % | 14.12 | % |
See notes to financial statements
58
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Ohio Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 39,983 | $ | 41,953 | $ | 44,385 | $ | 42,193 | $ | 42,444 | $ | 42,304 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 2.00 | %(4) | 1.93 | %(5) | 1.92 | % | 1.91 | % | 1.91 | % | 1.90 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.32 | %(4) | 0.72 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.29 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.32 | %(4) | 2.65 | %(5) | 2.66 | % | 2.45 | % | 2.20 | % | 2.19 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.98 | %(4) | 1.91 | %(5) | 1.92 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.88 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.75 | %(4) | 6.17 | % | 6.31 | % | 6.57 | % | 7.23 | % | 7.37 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 9 | %(9) | 24 | % | 16 | % | 13 | % | 12 | % | 23 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.27 | %(4) | 1.25 | %(5) | 1.25 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.20 | %(4) | 0.46 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.19 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.47 | %(4) | 1.71 | %(5) | 1.73 | % | 1.59 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.40 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.25 | %(4) | 1.23 | %(5) | 1.24 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.20 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.26 | %(4) | 3.99 | % | 4.08 | % | 4.25 | % | 4.64 | % | 4.69 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 940 | 940 | 940 | 940 | 940 | 940 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 67,542 | $ | 69,640 | $ | 72,223 | $ | 69,888 | $ | 70,153 | $ | 70,007 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
59
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Pennsylvania Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.840 | $ | 15.510 | $ | 14.870 | $ | 14.890 | $ | 15.210 | $ | 14.260 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 0.490 | $ | 0.953 | $ | 0.983 | $ | 1.008 | $ | 1.076 | $ | 1.089 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.464 | ) | (0.661 | ) | 0.664 | 0.103 | (0.301 | ) | 0.884 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders From net investment income |
(0.149 | ) | (0.300 | ) | (0.274 | ) | (0.181 | ) | (0.092 | ) | (0.080 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from operations | $ | (0.123 | ) | $ | (0.008 | ) | $ | 1.373 | $ | 0.930 | $ | 0.683 | $ | 1.893 | |||||||||||||
Less distributions to common shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $ | (0.317 | ) | $ | (0.662 | ) | $ | (0.733 | ) | $ | (0.950 | ) | $ | (1.003 | ) | $ | (0.943 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions to common shareholders | $ | (0.317 | ) | $ | (0.662 | ) | $ | (0.733 | ) | $ | (0.950 | ) | $ | (1.003 | ) | $ | (0.943 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 14.400 | $ | 14.840 | $ | 15.510 | $ | 14.870 | $ | 14.890 | $ | 15.210 | |||||||||||||||
Market value End of period (Common shares) | $ | 12.880 | $ | 12.790 | $ | 14.560 | $ | 14.660 | $ | 15.540 | $ | 15.980 | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) | (0.55 | )%(9) | 0.27 | % | 9.68 | % | 6.27 | % | 4.77 | % | 13.73 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) | 3.20 | %(9) | (7.95 | )% | 4.44 | % | 0.39 | % | 4.07 | % | 22.05 | % |
See notes to financial statements
60
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
Pennsylvania Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 |
Year Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | 2005(1) | 2004(1) | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted) | $ | 39,004 | $ | 40,182 | $ | 41,998 | $ | 40,233 | $ | 40,023 | $ | 40,670 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.99 | %(4) | 1.95 | %(5) | 1.94 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.91 | % | 1.92 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.40 | %(4) | 0.70 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.19 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 2.39 | %(4) | 2.65 | %(5) | 2.87 | % | 2.41 | % | 2.15 | % | 2.11 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.96 | %(4) | 1.94 | %(5) | 1.93 | % | 1.95 | % | 1.91 | % | 1.92 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6.80 | %(4) | 6.28 | % | 6.53 | % | 6.69 | % | 7.18 | % | 7.35 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover | 16 | %(9) | 23 | % | 18 | % | 28 | % | 8 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.26 | %(4) | 1.27 | %(5) | 1.25 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.23 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.26 | %(4) | 0.45 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.12 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.52 | %(4) | 1.72 | %(5) | 1.85 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.35 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.25 | %(4) | 1.26 | %(5) | 1.24 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.23 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.31 | %(4) | 4.06 | % | 4.21 | % | 4.30 | % | 4.61 | % | 4.69 | % | |||||||||||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share(7) | $ | 68,347 | $ | 69,658 | $ | 71,672 | $ | 69,708 | $ | 69,471 | $ | 70,193 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Approximate market value per preferred share(8) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 |
(1) Net investment income per share was computed using average common shares outstanding.
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
(4) Annualized.
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Trust's operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended November 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(9) Not annualized.
See notes to financial statements
61
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (California Trust), Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust (Florida Plus Trust) (formerly, Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust (Massachusetts Trust), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust (Michigan Trust), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust (New Jersey Trust), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust (New York Trust), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust (Ohio Trust) and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust (Pennsylvania Trust), (each individually referred to as the Trust, and collectively, the Trusts), are Massachusetts business trusts registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies. Each Trust seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and taxes in its specified state, as applicable.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Trusts. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation Municipal bonds and taxable obligations, if any, are generally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing vendor, as derived from such vendor's pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer. The pricing vendor may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Financial futures contracts and options on financial futures contracts listed on commodity exchanges are valued based on the closing price on the primary exchange on which such contracts trade. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a pricing vendor. Such vendor valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap curves provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Short-term obligations, maturing in sixty days or less, are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available, and investments for which the price of a security is not believed to represent its fair market value, are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
B Investment Transactions and Related Income Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes Each Trust's policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by each Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At November 30, 2007, the following Trusts, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards which will reduce each Trust's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Trusts of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards are as follows:
Trust | Amount | Expiration Date | |||||||||
California | $ | 2,239,451 | November 30, 2008 | ||||||||
995,999 | November 30, 2012 | ||||||||||
Florida Plus | 936,795 | November 30, 2008 | |||||||||
160,909 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
1,495,013 | November 30, 2012 | ||||||||||
114,338 | November 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
Massachusetts | 594,169 | November 30, 2008 | |||||||||
39,627 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
343,176 | November 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
Michigan | 337,655 | November 30, 2008 | |||||||||
165,469 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
475,985 | November 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
443,883 | November 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
697,198 | November 30, 2012 | ||||||||||
224,050 | November 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
62
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Trust | Amount | Expiration Date | |||||||||
New Jersey | $ | 1,990,715 | November 30, 2008 | ||||||||
262,308 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
177,350 | November 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
New York | 1,621,946 | November 30, 2008 | |||||||||
70,059 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Ohio | 625,515 | November 30, 2008 | |||||||||
850,745 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
764,355 | November 30, 2012 | ||||||||||
588,403 | November 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 807,118 | November 30, 2008 | |||||||||
844,973 | November 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
41,331 | November 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
502,868 | November 30, 2012 | ||||||||||
389,289 | November 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109". FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective on the last business day of the first required financial reporting period for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management has concluded that as of May 31, 2008, there are no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Trust's federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended November 30, 2007 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expense Reduction State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Trusts. Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Trust maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Trust's custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.
E Legal Fees Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
F Use of Estimates The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications Under each Trust's organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to each Trust, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of each Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Trust's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Trust that have not yet occurred.
H Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held The Trusts may invest in inverse floating rate securities, whereby a Trust may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Trust buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold to the broker by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Trust (the Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The Trusts may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Trust agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Inverse Floater held by a Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes
63
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Trust, thereby collapsing the SPV. Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities" (FAS 140), the Trusts account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in their Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption "Payable for floating rate notes issued" in their Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related to the Trusts' liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. At May 31, 2008, the amounts of the Trusts' Floating Rate Notes and related interest rates and collateral were as follows:
Trust |
Floating Rate Notes Outstanding |
Interest Rate or Range of Interest Rates (%) |
Collateral for Floating Rate Notes Outstanding |
||||||||||||
California | $ | 11,160,000 | 1.59 1.67 | $ | 17,061,548 | ||||||||||
Florida Plus | 5,175,000 | 1.60 1.67 | 7,865,234 | ||||||||||||
Massachusetts | 2,410,000 | 1.60 2.11 | 3,539,384 | ||||||||||||
Michigan | 1,125,000 | 1.60 1.67 | 1,510,388 | ||||||||||||
New Jersey | 11,742,000 | 1.61 1.67 | 18,468,021 | ||||||||||||
New York | 13,590,000 | 1.60 1.67 | 19,843,175 | ||||||||||||
Ohio | 2,830,000 | 1.60 1.67 | 4,442,665 | ||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 4,215,780 | 1.60 1.63 | 6,573,439 |
The Trusts' investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. The Trusts' investment policies do not allow the Trusts to borrow money for purposes of making investments. Management believes that the Trusts' restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability on the Trusts' Statements of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Trusts' restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the Trusts are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
I Financial Futures Contracts The Trusts may enter into financial futures contracts. The Trusts' investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, a Trust is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Trust each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Trust. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Trust may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. In entering such contracts, the Trust bears the risk if the counterparties do not perform under the contracts' terms.
J Interest Rate Swaps The Trusts may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, a Trust makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. A Trust is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
K When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions The Trusts may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Trusts maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
L Interim Financial Statements The interim financial statements relating to May 31, 2008 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Trusts' management, reflect all
64
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
2 Auction Preferred Shares
Each Trust issued Auction Preferred Shares (APS) on March 1, 1999 in a public offering. The underwriting discounts and other offering costs incurred in connection with the offering were recorded as a reduction of the paid-in capital of the common shares of each respective Trust. Dividends on the APS, which accrue daily, are cumulative at rates which are reset every seven days by an auction, unless a special dividend period has been set. If the APS auctions do not successfully clear, the dividend payment rate over the next period for the APS holders is set at a specified maximum applicable rate until such time as the APS auctions are successful. The maximum applicable rate on the APS is 110% (150% for taxable distributions) of the greater of the 1) "AA" Financial Composite Commercial Paper Rate or 2) Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Obligation Rate on the date of the auction.
The number of APS issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2008 is as follows:
Trust |
APS Issued and Outstanding |
||||||
California | 2,360 | ||||||
Florida Plus | 1,420 | ||||||
Massachusetts | 860 | ||||||
Michigan | 700 | ||||||
New Jersey | 1,520 | ||||||
New York | 1,780 | ||||||
Ohio | 940 | ||||||
Pennsylvania | 900 |
The APS are redeemable at the option of each Trust at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, on any dividend payment date. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if a Trust is in default for an extended period on its asset maintenance requirements with respect to the APS. If the dividends on the APS remain unpaid in an amount equal to two full years' dividends, the holders of the APS as a class have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In general, the holders of the APS and the common shares have equal voting rights of one vote per share, except that the holders of the APS, as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two members of the Board of Trustees. The APS have a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. Each Trust is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the Trusts' By-Laws and the 1940 Act. Each Trust pays an annual fee equivalent to 0.25% of the liquidation value of the APS for the remarketing efforts associated with the APS auctions.
3 Distributions to Shareholders
Each Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders, after payment of any dividends on any outstanding APS. In addition, at least annually, the Trusts intend to distribute all or substantially all of their net realized capital gains, if any. Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and are payable at the end of each dividend period. The dividend rates for APS at May 31, 2008, and the amount of dividends paid (including capital gains, if any) to APS shareholders, average APS dividend rates, and dividend rate ranges for the six months then ended were as follows:
Trust |
APS Dividend Rates at May 31, 2008 |
Dividends Paid to APS Shareholders |
Average APS Dividend Rates |
Dividend Rate Ranges (%) |
|||||||||||||||
California | 2.59 | % | $ | 1,045,197 | 3.54 | % | 2.48 4.51 | ||||||||||||
Florida Plus | 2.48 | 644,101 | 3.63 | 2.48 4.60 | |||||||||||||||
Massachusetts | 2.59 | 387,109 | 3.60 | 2.59 4.45 | |||||||||||||||
Michigan | 2.48 | 318,578 | 3.64 | 2.48 6.00 | |||||||||||||||
New Jersey | 2.59 | 671,906 | 3.54 | 1.71 4.51 | |||||||||||||||
New York | 2.48 | 785,678 | 3.53 | 2.40 4.53 | |||||||||||||||
Ohio | 2.56 | 430,491 | 3.66 | 2.56 4.65 | |||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 2.59 | 402,720 | 3.58 | 2.59 4.36 |
Beginning February 13, 2008, and consistent with the patterns in the broader market for auction rate securities, APS of the Trusts were unsuccessful in clearing due to an imbalance of sell orders over bids to buy the APS. As a result, the dividend rates on the APS were reset to the maximum applicable rates. The table above reflects such maximum dividend rates for each Trust as of May 31, 2008.
The Trusts distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial
65
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital.
4 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to each Trust. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.70% of each Trust's average weekly gross assets and is payable monthly. During the six months ended May 31, 2008, average weekly gross assets as referred to herein exclude assets deemed held pursuant to FAS 140 (see Note 1H). The administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the business affairs of each Trust and is computed at an annual rate of 0.20% of each Trust's average weekly gross assets. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, the investment adviser fee and administration fee were as follows:
Trust |
Investment Adviser Fee |
Administration Fee |
|||||||||
California | $ | 570,203 | $ | 162,915 | |||||||
Florida Plus | 334,629 | 95,608 | |||||||||
Massachusetts | 210,602 | 60,172 | |||||||||
Michigan | 165,361 | 47,246 | |||||||||
New Jersey | 364,469 | 104,134 | |||||||||
New York | 431,038 | 123,154 | |||||||||
Ohio | 223,558 | 63,874 | |||||||||
Pennsylvania | 215,410 | 61,546 |
Except for Trustees of the Trusts who are not members of EVM's organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Trusts out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Trusts who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Trusts are officers of EVM.
Pursuant to FAS 140, an Inverse Floater sold by the Florida Plus Trust to an affiliated fund was deemed to be held by the Florida Plus Trust. Interest income of $5,835 paid by the SPV to the affiliated fund for the six months ended May 31, 2008 was deemed paid by the Florida Trust and is included in interest expense. The fixed rate bond was withdrawn from the SPV and subsequently sold during the six months ended May 31, 2008.
5 Purchase and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the six months ended May 31, 2008 were as follows:
Trust | Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
California | $ | 28,253,265 | $ | 26,824,579 | |||||||
Florida Plus | 74,843,262 | 82,251,691 | |||||||||
Massachusetts | 6,782,198 | 8,048,964 | |||||||||
Michigan | 2,103,200 | 3,966,218 | |||||||||
New Jersey | 30,942,306 | 33,131,745 | |||||||||
New York | 27,478,542 | 33,764,034 | |||||||||
Ohio | 5,744,979 | 9,561,020 | |||||||||
Pennsylvania | 10,423,730 | 11,888,960 |
6 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
There were no common shares issued pursuant to the Trusts' dividend reinvestment plan for the six months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended November 30, 2007.
7 Federal Income Tax Basis of Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Trust at May 31, 2008, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
California Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 159,584,917 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 4,336,638 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (3,895,656 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation | $ | 440,982 | |||||
Florida Plus Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 94,885,057 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 2,271,485 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,951,143 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation | $ | (679,658 | ) | ||||
Massachusetts Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 60,253,087 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 1,383,507 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,312,360 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation | $ | (928,853 | ) |
66
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Michigan Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 44,984,938 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 1,731,493 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (1,760,236 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation | $ | (28,743 | ) | ||||
New Jersey Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 102,802,541 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 2,544,167 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (3,614,354 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation | $ | (1,070,187 | ) | ||||
New York Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 121,853,244 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 3,310,911 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (3,375,058 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation | $ | (64,147 | ) | ||||
Ohio Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 61,824,060 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 2,095,712 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (1,763,937 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation | $ | 331,775 | |||||
Pennsylvania Trust | |||||||
Aggregate Cost | $ | 59,447,754 | |||||
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ | 2,497,248 | |||||
Gross unrealized depreciation | (1,483,532 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation | $ | 1,013,716 |
8 Overdraft Advances
Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT may, in its discretion, advance funds to the Trusts to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft, the Trusts are obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, a rate above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on a Trust's assets to the extent of any overdraft. At May 31, 2008, the New York Trust had a payment due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $172,349.
9 Financial Instruments
The Trusts may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities to assist in managing exposure to various market risks. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Trust has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at May 31, 2008 is as follows:
Futures Contracts
Trust |
Expiration Date |
Contracts |
Position |
Aggregate Cost |
Value |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
California | 09/08 |
121 U.S. Treasury Bond |
Short | $ | (13,641,683 | ) | $ | (13,733,500 | ) | $ | (91,817 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Florida Plus | 09/08 |
60 U.S. Treasury Bond |
Short | $ | (6,764,471 | ) | $ | (6,810,000 | ) | $ | (45,529 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Michigan | 09/08 |
12 U.S. Treasury Bond |
Short | $ | (1,357,552 | ) | $ | (1,362,000 | ) | $ | (4,448 | ) | |||||||||||||||
New York | 09/08 |
127 U.S. Treasury Bond |
Short | $ | (14,456,266 | ) | $ | (14,414,500 | ) | $ | 41,766 | ||||||||||||||||
Ohio | 09/08 |
26 U.S. Treasury Bond |
Short | $ | (2,941,362 | ) | $ | (2,951,000 | ) | $ | (9,638 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 09/08 |
95 U.S. Treasury Bond |
Short | $ | (10,710,412 | ) | $ | (10,782,500 | ) | $ | (72,088 | ) |
Interest Rate Swaps
California Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 4,250,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 104,742 | |||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
6,825,000 | 4.9025 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
224,257 | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
2,575,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(113,328 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 215,671 |
67
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
Florida Plus Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 2,475,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 60,997 | |||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
3,975,000 | 4.9025 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
130,611 | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
1,500,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(66,016 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 125,592 |
Massachusetts Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 1,575,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 38,816 | |||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
2,500,000 | 4.9025 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
82,146 | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
925,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(40,710 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 80,252 |
Michigan Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
$ | 400,000 | 4.9025 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
$ | 13,143 | |||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
275,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(12,103 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,040 |
New Jersey Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 2,725,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 67,158 | |||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
4,375,000 | 4.9025 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
143,755 | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
1,650,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(72,618 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 138,295 |
New York Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 3,200,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 78,865 | |||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
5,200,000 | 4.9025 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
170,862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
1,925,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(84,721 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 165,006 |
Ohio Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 1,625,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 40,049 | |||||||||||||||
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. |
1,250,000 | 4.9025 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
July 9, 2008/ July 9, 2038 |
41,072 | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(44,011 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 37,110 |
Pennsylvania Trust
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Annual Fixed Rate Paid By Trust |
Floating Rate Paid To Trust |
Effective Date/ Termination Date |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
Lehman Brothers, Inc. |
$ | 1,825,000 | 4.985 | % |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 28, 2008/ September 28, 2038 |
$ | 44,978 | |||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
925,000 | 5.428 |
3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA |
September 10, 2008/ September 10, 2038 |
(40,710 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 4,268 |
The effective date represents the date on which the Trust and the counterparty to the interest rate swap contract begin interest payment accruals.
At May 31, 2008, the Trusts had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
68
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
10 Fair Value Measurements
The Trusts adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), "Fair Value Measurements", effective December 1, 2007. FAS 157 established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
Level 2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs (including a fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
At May 31, 2008, the inputs used in valuing the Trusts' investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
California Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | (91,817 | ) | |||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 171,185,899 | 215,671 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 171,185,899 | $ | 123,854 |
Florida Plus Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | (45,529 | ) | |||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 99,380,399 | 125,592 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 99,380,399 | $ | 80,063 |
Massachusetts Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 61,734,234 | 80,252 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 61,734,234 | $ | 80,252 |
Michigan Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | (4,448 | ) | |||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 46,081,195 | 1,040 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 46,081,195 | $ | (3,408 | ) |
New Jersey Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 113,474,354 | 138,295 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 113,474,354 | $ | 138,295 |
New York Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | 41,766 | ||||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 135,379,097 | 165,006 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 135,379,097 | $ | 206,772 |
Ohio Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | (9,638 | ) | |||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 64,985,835 | 37,110 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 64,985,835 | $ | 27,472 |
Pennsylvania Trust
Valuation Inputs |
Investments in Securities |
Other Financial Instruments* |
|||||||||||||
Level 1 | Quoted Prices | $ | | $ | (72,088 | ) | |||||||||
Level 2 | Other Significant Observable Inputs | 65,757,250 | 4,268 | ||||||||||||
Level 3 | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 65,757,250 | $ | (67,820 | ) |
* Other financial instruments are futures and swap contracts not reflected in the Portfolio of Investments, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument.
The Trusts held no investments or other financial instruments as of November 30, 2007 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
69
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT'D
11 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FAS 161 will have on the Trusts' financial statement disclosures.
12 Name Changes
Effective January 1, 2008, the name of Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust was changed to Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust.
Effective June 19, 2008, the name of Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust was changed to Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust.
13 Subsequent Event
In June 2008, California Trust, Florida Plus Trust, Massachusetts Trust, New Jersey Trust and New York Trust (collectively, the Trusts) secured financing intended to partially redeem a proportionate amount of the Trusts' APS. The replacement financing is being provided through the creation of tender option bonds, whereby each Trust will transfer highly rated bonds held in its portfolio to a special purpose vehicle that issues floater and residual certificates. The Trusts will hold the residual certificates and use the proceeds from the sale of the floater certificates to replace a portion of the outstanding APS. The floaters have a liquidity backstop financing facility provided by a major financial institution. The California Trust, Florida Plus Trust, Massachusetts Trust, New Jersey Trust and New York Trust expect to redeem approximately 6%, 36%, 7%, 3% and 15%, respectively, of their outstanding APS at the next respective dividend payable date on or after July 7, 2008. As of July 11, 2008, 137, 517, 58, 48 and 275 shares of APS of California Trust, Florida Plus Trust, Massachusetts Trust, New Jersey Trust and New York Trust, respectively, were redeemed.
70
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of May 31, 2008
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
Each Trust held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on March 28, 2008. The following action was taken by the shareholders of each Trust:
Item 1: The election of Thomas E. Faust Jr. and Allen R. Freedman as Class II Trustees of each Trust for a term expiring in 2010 and William H. Park, Norton H. Reamer and Heidi L. Steiger as Class III Trustees of each Trust for a three-year term expiring in 2011. Mr. Reamer was elected solely by APS shareholders.
Trust |
Nominee for Class II Trustee Elected by All Shareholders: Thomas E. Faust Jr. |
Nominee for Class II Trustee Elected by All Shareholders: Allen R. Freedman |
Nominee for Class III Trustee Elected by All Shareholders: William H. Park |
Nominee for Class III Trustee Elected by APS Shareholders: Norton H. Reamer |
Nominee for Class III Trustee Elected by All Shareholders: Heidi L. Steiger |
||||||||||||||||||
California | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 6,786,954 | 6,783,807 | 6,780,954 | 1,620 | 6,786,121 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 110,531 | 113,678 | 116,531 | 6 | 111,364 | ||||||||||||||||||
Florida Plus | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 3,528,018 | 3,526,518 | 3,528,018 | 1,403 | 3,528,018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 596,869 | 598,369 | 596,869 | 0 | 596,869 | ||||||||||||||||||
Massachusetts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 2,439,738 | 2,438,738 | 2,438,738 | 859 | 2,437,817 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 110,821 | 111,821 | 111,821 | 0 | 112,742 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michigan | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 1,967,159 | 1,967,159 | 1,967,159 | 695 | 1,967,159 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 83,920 | 83,920 | 83,920 | 0 | 83,920 | ||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 4,262,768 | 4,262,162 | 4,262,989 | 1,489 | 4,262,976 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 159,547 | 160,153 | 159,326 | 12 | 159,339 | ||||||||||||||||||
New York | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 5,050,672 | 5,039,872 | 5,040,672 | 1,749 | 5,054,022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 60,280 | 71,080 | 70,280 | 1 | 56,930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ohio | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 2,493,547 | 2,497,047 | 2,497,047 | 939 | 2,497,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 179,506 | 176,006 | 176,006 | 0 | 176,006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For | 2,556,120 | 2,558,546 | 2,558,546 | 899 | 2,558,071 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withheld | 71,095 | 68,669 | 68,669 | 0 | 69,144 |
71
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
Each Trust offers a dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) pursuant to which shareholders automatically have dividends and capital gains distributions reinvested in common shares (the Shares) of the same Trust unless they elect otherwise through their investment dealer. On the distribution payment date, if the net asset value per Share is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the net asset value per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on the open market by the Plan Agent. Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.
If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you will need to request that your shares be re-registered in your name with each Trust's transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, or you will not be able to participate.
The Plan Agent's service fee for handling distributions will be paid by each Trust. Each participant will be charged their pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.
Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by writing to the Plan Agent at the address noted on the following page. If you withdraw, you will receive shares in your name for all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the Plan Agent to have the Plan Agent sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
If you wish to participate in the Plan and your shares are held in your own name, you may complete the form on the following page and deliver it to the Plan Agent.
Any inquires regarding the Plan can be directed to the Plan Agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, at 1-866-439-6787.
72
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on your behalf, you should request that your common shares be re-registered in your own name which will enable your participation in the Plan.
The following authorization and appointment is given with the understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and conditions of the Plan.
Please print exact name on account
Shareholder signature Date
Shareholder signature Date
Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.
YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE YOUR DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.
This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the following address:
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
c/o American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
P.O. Box 922
Wall Street Station
New York, NY 10269-0560
Number of Employees
Each Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end, nondiversified, management investment company and has no employees.
Number of Shareholders
As of May 31, 2008 our records indicate that there are 51, 36, 51, 25, 64, 48, 44 and 62 registered shareholders for California Municipal Income Trust, Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust, Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust, Michigan Municipal Income Trust, New Jersey Municipal Income Trust, New York Municipal Income Trust, Ohio Municipal Income Trust and Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust, respectively, and approximately 2,891, 2,302, 1,301, 1,402, 2,316, 2,543, 1,600 and 1,550 shareholders owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks, and financial intermediaries for California Municipal Income Trust, Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust, Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust, Michigan Municipal Income Trust, New Jersey Municipal Income Trust, New York Municipal Income Trust, Ohio Municipal Income Trust and Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust, respectively.
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust reports directly, which contain important information about a Trust, please write or call:
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
The Eaton Vance Building
255 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
1-800-225-6265
American Stock Exchange symbols
California Municipal Income Trust CEV
Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust FEV
Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust MMV
Michigan Municipal Income Trust EMI
New Jersey Municipal Income Trust EVJ
New York Municipal Income Trust EVY
Ohio Municipal Income Trust EVO
Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust EVP
73
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
BOARD OF TRUSTEES' ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund's board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not "interested persons" of the fund ("Independent Trustees"), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a "Board") of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the "Eaton Vance Funds") held on April 21, 2008, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2008. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;
An independent report comparing each fund's total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;
An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;
Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices;
Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund;
Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund;
Information about Portfolio Management
Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel;
Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through "soft dollar" benefits received in connection with the funds' brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds;
Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;
The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;
Information about each Adviser
Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;
Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;
Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;
Copies of or descriptions of each adviser's proxy voting policies and procedures;
Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions;
Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;
Other Relevant Information
Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;
Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds' administrator; and
The terms of each advisory agreement.
74
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
BOARD OF TRUSTEES' ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT'D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2008, the Board met eleven times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met twelve, seven and five times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund's investment objective. The Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee are newly established and did not meet during the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2008.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund's investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust (formerly, Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust)
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust
(the "Funds"), each with Eaton Vance Management (the "Adviser"), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser's management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds, and recent changes in the identity of such personnel with respect to certain Funds. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser's large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities.
75
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
BOARD OF TRUSTEES' ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT'D
The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Board also considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared each Fund's investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, and five-year periods ended September 30, 2007 for each Fund in operation over such periods. The Board concluded that the performance of each Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by each Fund (referred to collectively as "management fees"). The Board considered the financial resources committed by the Adviser in structuring each Fund at the time of its initial public offering. As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund's management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2007, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for each Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged to the Fund for advisory and related services and the total expense ratio of the Fund are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized with and without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser in connection with its relationship with the Funds.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board also considered the fact that the Funds are not continuously offered and concluded that, in light of the level of the Adviser's profits with respect to each Fund, the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is not appropriate at this time. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and each Fund.
76
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
Officers Cynthia J. Clemson President of CEV, FEV, EMI, EVY, EVO and EVP; Vice President of MMV and EVJ and Portfolio Manager of CEV and FEV Robert B. MacIntosh President of MMV and EVJ; Vice President of CEV, FEV, EMI, EVY, EVO and EVP and Portfolio Manager of MMV and EVJ William H. Ahern, Jr. Vice President and Portfolio Manager of EMI and EVO Craig R. Brandon Vice President and Portfolio Manager of EVY Thomas M. Metzold Vice President Adam A. Weigold Vice President and Portfolio Manager of EVP Barbara E. Campbell Treasurer Maureen A. Gemma Secretary Paul M. O'Neil Chief Compliance Officer |
Trustees Ralph F. Verni Chairman Benjamin C. Esty Thomas E. Faust Jr. Allen R. Freedman William H. Park Ronald A. Pearlman Heidi L. Steiger Lynn A. Stout |
||||||
American Stock Exchange symbols
California Municipal Income Trust Florida Plus Municipal Income Trust Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust Michigan Municipal Income Trust New Jersey Municipal Income Trust New York Municipal Income Trust Ohio Municipal Income Trust Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust |
CEV FEV MMV EMI EVJ EVY EVO EVP |
||||||
77
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
Eaton Vance Management
The Eaton Vance Building
255 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
The Eaton Vance Building
255 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
147-7/08 CE-MUNISRC
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrants Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty finance company). Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (UAM) (a holding company owning institutional investment management firms).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required in this filing
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the Fund Policy), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Funds investment adviser and adopted the investment advisers proxy voting policies and procedures (the Policies) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Funds proxy voting records from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the event that a conflict of interest arises between the Funds shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such conflict until it consults with the Boards Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund Policy. The Boards Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate course of action.
The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a companys management to its shareholders and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy voting service (Agent), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and recordkeeping and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent. The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer then back to the investment adviser pursuant to the Policies. It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible transactions, except in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from
exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of interest between the Funds shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and prospective corporate clients. The investment advisers personnel responsible for reviewing and voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from a company included on that list to the personal of the investment adviser identified in the Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material conflict of interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commissions website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrants current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commissions rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) |
|
Registrants Code of Ethics Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
(a)(2)(i) |
|
Treasurers Section 302 certification. |
(a)(2)(ii) |
|
Presidents Section 302 certification. |
(b) |
|
Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
By: |
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
July 14, 2008 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: |
/s/ Barbara E. Campbell |
|
||
|
Barbara E. Campbell |
|
||
|
Treasurer |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Date: |
July 14, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
||
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
||
|
President |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Date: |
July 14, 2008 |
|
||