UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB/A

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition Period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 000-19949

TORRENT ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

3400-666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2X8
(Address of principal executive offices)

(604) 639-3118
(Issuer's telephone number)

528-666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2X8
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section l2, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [X] No [ ]

As of November 5, 2004, 15,656,249 shares of Common Stock of the Issuer were outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

-2-

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Torrent Energy Corporation (the "Company") without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2004, and its results of operations for the six month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and its cash flows for the six month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. The results for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto filed as a part of the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB.

Note: EXCEPT WHERE AND AS OTHERWISE STATED TO THE CONTRARY IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT, ALL SHARE, PRICES PER SHARE AND EXERCISE PRICES HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO GIVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT TO THE CHANGE IN THE PRICE PER SHARE OF THE COMMON STOCK RESULTING FROM THE ONE-FOR-TEN SHARE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COMMON STOCK THAT TOOK EFFECT ON JANUARY 20, 2004.

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

-8-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

-9-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

-10-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

-11-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

-12-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

The gross proceeds of the Private Placement will be paid as follows:

-13-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and Prepared by Management)

-14-

The information in this discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding the Company's capital needs, business strategy and expectations. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "plan", "intend", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "predict", "potential" or "continue", the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various risk factors in other reports the Company files with the SEC, including the Company's Form SB-2 dated September 23, 2004 and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004. These factors may cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement. The Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update these statements, or disclose any difference between its actual results and those reflected in these statements. The information constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Torrent Energy Corporation is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and if and when warranted, development of natural gas and coalbed methane properties in the United States. Our current focus is on the development of the Coos Bay Basin project in Oregon.

We have been in the exploration or development stage since our inception. We have had no significant operating revenue to date, have accumulated losses of $2,001,143 and will require additional working capital to sustain our minimal operations and carry out our exploration objectives. These circumstances raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

We are currently reviewing various financing alternatives, including the possibility of an additional private equity offering. There can be no assurance, however, that such financings will be available to us or, if it is, that it will be available on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

We currently have no facilities and no employees.

On May 11, 2004, we entered into a Lease Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement") with GeoTrends-Hampton International LLC ("GHI") to purchase certain oil and gas leases for the Coos Bay Basin exploration prospect located onshore in the Coos Bay Basin of Oregon, through our subsidiary, Methane Energy Corp. ("Methane"). GHI is a Washington limited liability company that owned the rights to a coalbed methane gas exploration prospect in the Coos Bay Basin of Oregon, including technical information on this prospect, fee leases, State leases, lease options and agreements controlling oil and gas rights covering approximately 50,000 acres.

Pursuant to the Agreement, we, through Methane, have acquired all of GHI's petroleum and natural gas rights in and to a number of oil and gas leases (the "Leases") for the Coos Bay Basin exploration prospect. As consideration for the rights in and to the Leases, we paid to GHI an aggregate of $300,000 in cash and will issue 1,800,000 shares of our common stock in the following installments:

-15-

First common share installment: On the closing of the Agreement, we issued to GHI 450,000 and to Thomas Deacon 150,000 of our common shares. Thomas Deacon is an operator who worked with GHI in assembling the leases purchased by Methane and became the Vice President of Land of Methane in August of 2004.

Second common share installment: Upon Methane and/or our agents or contractors spudding of the initial well of exploration or core test program within, on or under the lands as permitted by the Leases, we will issue to GHI an additional 450,000 and to Thomas Deacon 150,000 of our common shares. However, if such drilling is not commenced by December 31, 2004, then the parties will have no further rights or obligations under the Agreement;

Third common share installment: Upon Methane and/or our agents or contractors spudding of the initial well of the state approved development drilling program within, on or under the lands as permitted by the Leases, we will issue to GHI the final 450,000 and to Thomas Deacon 150,000 of our common shares. However, if such drilling is not commenced by June 30, 2006, then the parties will have no further rights or obligations under the Agreement.

GHI delivered to us an assignment of 100% of the petroleum and natural gas lease rights it controlled subject only to royalty and overriding royalty interests of record on the closing date. GHI reserved to itself an undivided 4% of 8/8ths overriding royalty interest in the lands covered by the Leases, and all production therefrom. This reservation of overriding royalty interest will also apply to any oil and gas leases acquired within an area of mutual interest of both GHI and us and will be free and clear of any cost and expense of the development, operation and marketing of production from the Leases, except for taxes applicable.

On July 1, 2004, we leased an additional 10,400 acres within the Coos Bay Basin in Oregon. With this additional acreage the total land position held by us now exceeds 60,000 acres. We continue to identify and negotiate the leasing of additional acreage in the area.

On October 6, 2004, we signed a Drilling Services Agreement with a Utah based drilling company which has extensive drilling and consulting experience in coalbed methane in order to commence a six hole coring program on our Leases. The six hole coring program is expected to commence in early November and take approximately two to three weeks per hole in order to properly complete the coring and sampling process. The analysis of the coring samples should be complete within sixty days of the entire coring program being finished. The six locations were chosen in order to further confirm and delineate the gas content data in the Coos County coal beds and to assist us in determining the positioning of our potential pilot test well programs anticipated next year.

Coalbed methane is the natural gas that lies trapped in coal seams at shallow depths. It is different from other resources because it is both generated and stored within the actual coalbeds themselves. It is also an attractive resource because it occurs within coal, which is the most abundant fuel in the United States. Coal acts like a sponge, storing up to six times the amount of natural gas found in conventional reservoirs.

Over the past 20 years, coalbed methane production has increased steadily due to its abundance, relatively low cost of drilling at shallow depths, improved technology and the growing demand for natural gas.

The success of recent coalbed methane projects has been largely due to improved drilling and completion techniques, better hydraulic fracture designs and significant cost reductions as a result of highly dependable gas content and reservoir performance analysis. Also spurring the growth of this sector is the growing shortage of quality domestic conventional natural gas projects and production declines from existing conventional reservoirs.

-16-

The Coos Bay Basin is located along the Pacific coast in southwestern Oregon approximately 200 miles south of the Columbia River and 80 miles north of the California border. The onshore portion of the Coos Bay Basin is elliptical in outline covering over 250 square miles.

Based on existing data, it is estimated that up to 100,000 acres in the Coos Bay Basin are potentially prospective for coal bed methane and conventional natural gas production. The Leases acquired by us include oil and gas leases, lease option agreements or other exploration commitments covering over 60,000 net oil and gas acres within the primary Coos Bay Basin Exploration Prospect area of mutual interest.

Year-round access is excellent via logging and fire control roads maintained by the United States Forest Service and timber industry. Numerous potential drill site locations have already been constructed as timber recovery staging areas, and are available to be utilized in the initial testing phase of our planned 2004 drill program.

The Coos Bay Basin is a structural basin formed by folding and faulting that preserves a portion of coal-bearing sediments deposited on an extensive, middle Eocene-age, swampy coastal plain. The coal-bearing sandstones and siltstones of the Upper Eocene Coaledo formation are estimated to form a section approximately 6,600 feet thick. The Basin has multiple seams of coal, many of which contain coalbed methane. However, the state of Oregon has to date produced no commercial quantities of coalbed methane gas.

The Port of Coos Bay and surrounding area is one of the largest population centers on the west coast not currently served by natural gas. A project to bring natural gas into the region via pipeline is currently under construction and nearing completion. The local distribution company serving this market has already constructed mains and many services in the area. It is anticipated that this pipeline will provide a ready market for gas from the Coos Bay Basin project. The pipeline will be connected to the Northwest Pipeline system, allowing access to the potentially lucrative Pacific Northwest markets.

We currently lease approximately 60,000 acres in the Coos Bay Basin and have identified approximately 30,000 to 40,000 additional acres falling within the Coos Bay Basin Prospect. Our objective is to achieve a land lease position of over 100,000 acres before the end of 2004, although there is no assurance that we can reach that goal.

We are planning an aggressive drilling and exploration program in the Coos Bay Basin. Based on existing raw data, which provides substantial subsurface information, we believe we will begin a core hole drilling program in November of 2004. A total of four to six core holes will be drilled at depths ranging from 1,000 to 4,000 feet. It is expected to take approximately two to three weeks to drill each hole. If commercial gas resource estimates can be verified, production testing should follow with full pilot test well programs in mid 2005.

-17-

The continuation of our business is dependent upon obtaining further financing, a successful program of acquisition, positive results of exploration, and, finally, achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There are no assurances that we will be able to obtain further funds required for our continued operations. As noted herein, we are pursuing various financing alternatives to meet our immediate and long-term financial requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, we will be unable to conduct our operations as planned, and we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due. In such event, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations. Further, there can be no assurance that our exploration will result in any commercial findings of oil and gas, or any findings at all.

The results of operations include the results of Torrent and its wholly owned subsidiary, Methane, for the six months ended September 30, 2004 and Torrent and its wholly owned subsidiary, Catalyst, for the six months ended September 30, 2003. During the six months ended September 30, 2004, Torrent performed all of the administrative operations while the subsidiary, Methane, holds the interests in the leases and operates the Coos Bay project.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses rose considerably between the periods due to our increased activity compared to the prior period when we had no operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we concluded two financings and acquired additional oil and gas leases in the Coos Bay Basin of Oregon. Operating expenses consisted of consulting fees, investor relation's expenses, accounting and legal fees, stock based compensation and other general corporate expenses.

Operating expenses were $442,670 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared with $33,072 for the three months ended September 30, 2003. A significant portion of the increase in expenditures was due to investor relation's expenses of $148,932 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and shareholder relation's expenses of $43,293 for the three months ended September 30, 2004. Investor relations expenses consisted of fees of $148,932 for a mail distribution pursuant to an agreement to provide a shareholder awareness program. Shareholder relation expenses consisted of costs associated with disseminating press releases and the costs of designing and maintaining of our website, www.torrentenergy.com. This compares with no such investor relations or shareholder relations expenses for the comparative period in 2003 when we were relatively inactive.

Consulting fees were $12,977 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared with $19,566 for the three months ended September 30, 2003. During the current period, the consulting services related to the ongoing administration of our new office in Oregon for our Coos Bay project. During the comparative period in 2003, consultants were engaged to sustain our minimum operations.

During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we investigated a potential oil and gas property acquisition and made a $100,000 deposit and spent $1,651 on technical due diligence. We have since decided not to purchase the property and have written off the deposit for accounting purposes but continue to seek repayment of our deposit.

Net Loss for the Period. We recorded a net loss of $442,507 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared with a net loss of $33,072 for the three months ended September 30, 2003.

-18-

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $1,117,989 for the six months ended September 30, 2004, compared with $61,662 for the six months ended September 30, 2003 when we had no operations. A significant portion of the increase was attributable to the recording of $461,336 in stock based compensation during the six months ended September 30, 2004, compared with no such expense for the six months ended September 30, 2003. The stock based compensation expense consisted of a charge of $299,336 relating to the granting of 740,000 stock options to consultants and directors during the current period and a charge of $162,000 relating to the issuance of 300,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to an investor relations agreement to provide an investor awareness program for a period of one year.

Consulting fees were $115,187 for the six months ended September 30, 2004, compared with $46,039 for the six months ended September 30, 2003. During the current period, we recorded $80,000 in consulting services for the final restructuring efforts and for purchase investigation services. The balance of the consulting fees of $35,187 related to technical and administrative consulting services for our Coos Bay project. During the comparative period in 2003, consultants were engaged to sustain our minimum operations. Insurance expenses were $46,569 for the six months ended September 30, 2004 compared to no such expense for the six months ended September 30, 2003. We were required to have pollution liability coverage in order to secure certain leases.

Legal and accounting costs rose during the periods primarily as a result of increased legal fees to negotiate and close several financings and the acquisition of certain oil and gas leases. As a result, our legal and accounting costs rose to $60,589 for the six months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $13,262 for the six months ended September 30, 2003 which was largely the year end audit fees.

Net Loss for the Period. We recorded a net loss of $1,117,826 for the six months ended September 30, 2004, compared with a net loss of $61,662 for the six months ended September 30, 2003.

Our cash on hand was $1,149,571 as at September 30, 2004 compared to $12,621 at March 31, 2004. Our working capital improved to $990,691 as at September 30, 2004, compared to a working capital deficit of $15,261 as at March 31, 2004.

Our improved cash position and working capital was achieved though receipt of net proceeds of $769,025 from the issuance of common stock and net proceeds of $1,450,000 (gross proceeds of $1,650,000 less finders' fees of $165,000 and legal fees of $35,000) from the issuance of our preferred stock. This compares with no such capital proceeds during the six months ended September 30, 2003 when we were inactive.

During the six months ended September 30, 2004, we expended cash of $556,583 on our Coos Bay project. This included $305,562 in acquisition costs, including the $300,000 cash payments to GHI, $208,633 in lease costs to secure the oil and gas rights and $42,388 for the purchase of existing seismic data in Coos Bay. During the comparative period, we made no such investments as we were inactive.

We are not required to make any further lease payments pursuant to our oil and gas leases, until after our next year end of March 31, 2005.

We will require additional financing in order to complete our stated plan of operations for the next twelve months. We believe that we will require additional financing to carry out our intended objectives during the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that such financing will be available or, if it is available, that we will be able to structure such financing on terms acceptable to us and that it will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements until we can reach a level of profitable operations and positive cash flows. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern. We currently have no firm commitments for any additional capital.

-19-

Changes in internal controls: There were no changes in internal controls over financial reporting, known to the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is likely to materially effect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.