e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 0-21044
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
33-0204817 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6101 Gateway Drive |
|
|
Cypress, California
|
|
90630 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (714) 820-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to
submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Large accelerated filer
|
|
þ Accelerated filer
|
|
o Non-accelerated filer
|
|
o Smaller Reporting Company |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 13,616,847 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the
registrant were outstanding on May 5, 2009.
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share-related data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,357 |
|
|
$ |
75,238 |
|
Term deposit |
|
|
48,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
54,674 |
|
|
|
59,825 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
41,929 |
|
|
|
43,675 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
167,284 |
|
|
|
184,620 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
|
8,686 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13,555 |
|
|
|
10,757 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
12,014 |
|
|
|
5,637 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7,231 |
|
|
|
7,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
208,706 |
|
|
$ |
217,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
37,164 |
|
|
$ |
44,705 |
|
Accrued sales discounts, rebates and royalties |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
6,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
54,963 |
|
|
|
62,317 |
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
56,717 |
|
|
|
64,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000
shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 18,760,034 and 18,715,833 shares
issued at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
121,789 |
|
|
|
120,551 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
750 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
105,110 |
|
|
|
104,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,969 |
|
|
|
225,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less cost of common stock in treasury, 5,169,380
and 5,070,319 shares at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(73,980 |
) |
|
|
(72,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
151,989 |
|
|
|
153,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
208,706 |
|
|
$ |
217,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
71,126 |
|
|
$ |
61,191 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
49,689 |
|
|
|
39,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21,437 |
|
|
|
21,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
17,791 |
|
|
|
16,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
2,683 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
13,831 |
|
|
|
14,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Provision for inventory write-downs |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Benefit for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Shares issued for employee benefit plan |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(6,187 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(7,887 |
) |
|
|
(2,594 |
) |
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
|
5,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Deposit |
|
|
(48,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
(674 |
) |
|
|
(2,502 |
) |
Acquisition of intangible assets |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Acquisition of assets from Zilog, Inc. |
|
|
(9,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(59,330 |
) |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
(11,455 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
(11,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(57,881 |
) |
|
|
(3,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
75,238 |
|
|
|
86,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17,357 |
|
|
$ |
83,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Universal
Electronics Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries contain all the adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature and certain reclassifications have been made
to prior-year amounts in order to conform to the current-year presentation. Information and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements, which are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed
or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As used
herein, the terms Company, we, us and our refer to Universal Electronics Inc. and its
subsidiaries, unless the context indicates to the contrary.
Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Risk Factors, Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions
and Results of Operations, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, and the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Items 1A, 7, 7A, and 8,
respectively, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Estimates, Judgments and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition, allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, warranties,
inventory valuation, business combination purchase price allocations, impairment of long-lived
assets, intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes and stock-based compensation expense. Actual
results may differ from these judgments and estimates, and they may be adjusted as more information
becomes available. Any adjustment may be material.
See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 for a summary of our significant accounting policies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 applies to all assets and liabilities
within the scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements,
except as discussed in paragraphs 2 and 3 of Statement 157 Fair Value Measurements, providing
additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset
or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 emphasizes that even if there
has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and
regardless of the valuation technique(s) used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains
the same. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between
market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP 157-4 is effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and will be applied
prospectively. The implementation of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
6
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB
Statement No. 107 Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments to require disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28
Interim Financial Reporting to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. FSP 107-1and APB 28-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March
15, 2009. The implementation of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes
disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. The adoption of Statement 141R will affect the total purchase price of future
acquisitions, as acquisition costs will now be expensed, and the allocation of fair value to
specific assets and liabilities will be different. SFAS 141R was effective for us January 1, 2009.
As a result of adopting SFAS 141R we recognized $1.1 million of acquisition costs during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 related to our purchase of assets from Zilog, Inc. The acquisition
costs recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2009 included $0.1 million of acquisition
costs that were capitalized at December 31, 2008.
In addition to the recently adopted accounting standard above, we adopted the following accounting
standards during the first quarter of 2009, none of which had a material effect on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations:
|
|
FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets |
|
|
|
EITF Issue No. 08-7, Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
EITF Issue No. 08-6, Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees:
An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of
the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161 |
|
|
|
FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities |
|
|
|
EITF Issue No. 08-3, Accounting by Lessees for Nonrefundable Maintenance Deposits |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133 |
|
|
|
SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan amendment of
ARB No. 51 |
|
|
|
EITF Issue No. 07-1, Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements |
Note 2: Stock-Based Compensation
We account for our stock-based compensation plans under SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123R). Stock-based compensation expense for each employee and director is presented in the same
income statement caption as their cash compensation. We recorded $1.0 million and $1.2 million of
pre-tax stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
7
Stock-based compensation expense by income statement caption for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 was the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) includes stock-based compensation related to
restricted stock awards granted to outside directors of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and pre-tax stock-based compensation related to
stock option awards granted to outside directors of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The income tax benefit under SFAS 123R from the recognition of stock-based compensation for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Stock Option Grants
In accordance with SFAS 123R, compensation expense related to stock option awards is determined
based on the fair value of the shares awarded on the grant date. We recognize the compensation
expense related to stock option awards net of estimated forfeitures over the service period of the
award, which is the option vesting term ranging from three to four years. We estimated the annual
forfeiture rate based upon our historical forfeitures. The compensation expense recognized for
stock option awards at any date is equal to the portion of the grant-date fair value that is vested
on that date.
We estimate the fair value of stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
utilizing the following assumptions and weighted average fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
2008(1) |
Weighted average fair value of grants |
|
$ |
7.01 |
|
|
$ |
8.71 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
49.59 |
% |
|
|
40.70 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value calculation was based on stock options granted during each respective
period. |
During the first quarter of 2009, the Board of Directors granted our executives 185,900 stock
options under various stock incentive plans. The grants, dated March 10, 2009, are subject to a
four-year vesting period (one-sixteenth each quarter). The stock-based compensation expense
included in SG&A related to this award was $20 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, we granted a minimal amount of options to new hires.
8
Stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Price |
|
(in years) |
|
(in thousands) |
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
17.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
8.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
Forfeited/cancelled/ expired |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
26.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
$ |
17.56 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
$ |
4,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
$ |
4,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
$ |
15.82 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
$ |
4,348 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value that
option holders would have received had all option holders exercised their options on March 31,
2009. The aggregate intrinsic value is the difference between the closing price of Universal
Electronics Inc.s common stock on the last trading day of the first quarter of 2009 and the option
exercise price, multiplied by the number of the in-the-money options. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, was $0.2 million and $0.1
million, respectively.
At March 31, 2009, there was $3.9 million of unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense
related to non-vested stock options which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average life of
2.8 years.
Restricted Stock Grants
In accordance with SFAS 123R, compensation expense related to restricted stock awards is determined
based on the fair value of the shares awarded on the grant date. We determined the fair value of
the restricted stock utilizing the average of the high and low trade prices of our Companys shares
on the grant date. We recognize the employee compensation expense over the service period of the
award, which is the vesting term ranging from two to four years. The compensation expense
recognized for restricted stock awards at any date is equal to the portion of the grant-date fair
value that is vested on that date.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors granted 290,062
shares of restricted stock to employees under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. The first grant of
77,146 shares, dated February 12, 2009, is subject to a three-year vesting period (5% each quarter
during the first two years and 15% each quarter during the third year). The second grant of 24,723
shares, dated March 4, 2009, is subject to a two-year vesting period (12.5% each quarter). The
third grant of 147,693 shares, dated March 10, 2009, is subject to a three-year vesting period
(8.75% each quarter during the first two years and 7.5% each quarter during the third year). The
fourth grant of 40,500 shares, dated March 10, 2009, is subject to a four-year vesting period
(6.25% each quarter). The pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to these awards was $0.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Non-vested restricted stock awards activity during the three months ended and as of March 31, 2009,
was the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average |
|
|
Granted |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
$ |
23.23 |
|
Granted |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
15.03 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
20.50 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
$ |
16.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
As of March 31, 2009, we expect to recognize $6.0 million in unrecognized pre-tax compensation
expense related to non-vested restricted stock awards over a weighted-average life of 2.6 years.
Note 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Term Deposits
Cash and cash equivalents include cash accounts and all investments purchased with initial
maturities of three months or less. We maintain cash and cash equivalents with various financial
institutions located in many different geographic regions. As part of our cash and risk management
processes, we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of the financial
institutions. We attempt to mitigate our exposure to interest rate, liquidity, credit and other
relevant risks by placing our cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions we believe are
high quality. We have not sustained credit losses from instruments held at financial institutions.
At March 31, 2009, we had approximately $5.9 million, $8.7 million, and $2.8 million of cash and
cash equivalents in the United States, Europe, and Asia, respectively. In addition, we had a term
deposit of $48.9 million in Asia at March 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $8.4
million, $6.1 million, and $60.7 million of cash and cash equivalents in the United States, Europe,
and Asia, respectively.
At March 31, 2009 we had a six month term deposit cash account in Hong Kong with ABN Amro Bank. The
term began on January 13, 2009 and ends on July 13, 2009. The term deposit earns interest at a rate
of 1.05%. The interest is receivable on July 13, 2009. The deposit amount and accrued interest
related to this account as of March 31, 2009 was $48.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively. If
we withdraw the funds prior to the end of the term a penalty will be assessed only if the interest
rate on the date of withdrawal is higher than the rate on January 13, 2009. The penalty amount is
equal to the interest the bank will have to pay another depositor with the same principal balance
over the remaining term using the rate in effect on the withdrawal date, less the interest the bank
would have had to pay us.
Note 4: Accounts Receivable and Revenue Concentrations
Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Trade receivable, gross |
|
$ |
58,096 |
|
|
$ |
65,014 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
(2,439 |
) |
Allowance for sales returns |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
(2,823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trade receivable |
|
|
54,363 |
|
|
|
59,752 |
|
Other receivables (1) |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
54,674 |
|
|
$ |
59,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other receivables as of March 31, 2009 consisted of $237 thousand in sales tax and
VAT tax receivable. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $73 thousand of other
receivables related to a discount receivable from a vendor for tooling. |
Significant Customers
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we had net sales to two significant
customers that each amounted to more than 10% of our total net sales.
Net sales to the first significant customer, when combined with its sub-contractors, totaled $16.6
million and $9.3 million, accounting for 23.3% and 15.1% of our total net sales, for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Trade receivables with this customer and its
sub-contractors amounted to $12.5 million and $11.7 million, or 22.9% and 19.5% of our net trade
receivable at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Net sales to our second significant customer and its sub-contractors totaled $8.3 million and $6.4
million, accounting for 11.7% and 10.5% of our total net sales, for the three months ended March
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
10
Trade receivables with this customer amounted to $3.8 million and $9.1 million, or 7.0% and 15.3%
of our net trade receivable at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The loss of these customers, either in the United States or abroad, due to their financial weakness
or bankruptcy, or our inability to obtain orders or maintain order volume with them, may have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 5: Inventories and Significant Suppliers
Inventories
Inventories consist of remote controls, audio-video accessories and the related component parts.
Inventoriable costs include materials, labor, freight-in and manufacturing overhead related to the
purchase and production of inventories. We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market.
Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. We attempt to carry inventories in amounts
necessary to satisfy our customer requirements on a timely basis.
Product innovations and technological advances may shorten a given products life cycle. We
continually monitor our inventories to identify any excess or obsolete items on hand. We write down
our inventories for estimated excess and obsolescence in an amount equal to the difference between
the cost of the inventories and its estimated market value. These estimates are based upon
managements judgment about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are
less favorable than those projected by management, additional write-downs may be required.
Inventories, net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Components |
|
$ |
8,076 |
|
|
$ |
7,879 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
35,427 |
|
|
|
37,331 |
|
Reserve for inventory scrap |
|
|
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
41,929 |
|
|
$ |
43,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, inventory write-downs totaled $0.9 million
and $0.3 million, respectively. Inventory write-downs are a normal part of our business and result
primarily from product life cycle estimation variances.
Significant Suppliers
Most of the components used in our products are available from multiple sources. We have elected to
purchase integrated circuits (IC), used principally in our wireless control products, from two
main sources. Purchases from one of these suppliers amounted to more than 10% of total inventory
purchases. Purchases from this supplier amounted to $6.3 million and $6.7 million, representing
14.7% and 17.2% of total inventory purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Accounts payable with this supplier amounted to $3.7 million and $3.6 million,
representing 10.0% and 8.1% of total accounts payable at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, purchases from three of our component and finished
good suppliers amounted to more than 10% of total inventory purchases. Purchases from these three
suppliers amounted to $10.7 million, $9.2 million and $7.6 million, representing 24.9%, 21.5% and
17.7%, respectively, of total inventory purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2009. During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, purchases from these three suppliers amounted to $11.9
million, $6.6 million and $3.5 million, representing 30.7%, 17.0% and 9.1%, respectively, of total
inventory purchases. Accounts payable with these component and finished suppliers amounted to $7.6
million, $9.7 million and $7.3 million, representing 20.5%, 26.0% and 19.7%, respectively, of total
accounts payable at March 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, accounts payable with the same suppliers
amounted to $11.0 million, $15.6 million and $5.4 million, representing 24.7%, 35.0% and 12.0%,
respectively, of total accounts payable. No other suppliers accounted for more than 10% of total
inventory purchases during the quarters ended March 31, 2009 or 2008.
11
We have identified alternative sources of supply for these ICs, components, and finished goods;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to obtain these inventory
purchases on a timely basis. We generally maintain inventories of our integrated chips, which could
be used in part to mitigate, but not eliminate, delays resulting from supply interruptions. An
extended interruption, shortage or termination in the supply of any of the components used in our
products, or a reduction in their quality or reliability, or a significant increase in prices of
components, would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 6: Income Taxes
We use our estimated annual effective tax rate to determine our provision for income taxes for
interim periods. We recorded income tax expense of $0.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared to $1.3 million for the same period last year. Our estimated effective tax rate
was 39.1% and 34.3% during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
increase in our effective tax rate for the first quarter is due to
fixed interest expense on tax contingencies representing a higher
percentage of pre-tax income coupled with a higher percentage of
income earned in higher tax rate jurisdictions.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes- an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). At March 31,
2009, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $9.1 million, including interest and
penalties, of which approximately $8.3 million of this amount would affect the annual effective tax
rate, if these tax benefits are realized. Further, we are unaware of any positions for which it is
reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase
within the next twelve months. However, based on federal, state and foreign statute expirations in
various jurisdictions, we anticipate a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $0.1
million within the next twelve months.
In accordance with FIN 48, we have elected to classify interest and penalties as components of tax
expense. Accrued interest and penalties were $1.3 million at March 31, 2009 and $1.2 million at
December, 31, 2008 and are included in the unrecognized tax benefits.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and in various state and foreign
jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2009, the open statutes of limitations in our significant tax
jurisdictions are as follows: federal and state for 2004 through 2008, and non-U.S. for 2001
through 2008. Unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2009 of $6.0 million, including related
interest of $1.0 million, are classified as short term as we expect to settle certain foreign
audits during 2009. The remainder of the gross unrecognized tax benefits of $3.1 million are
classified as long term as prescribed by FIN 48 because we do not anticipate payment of cash
related to those unrecognized tax benefits within one year of the operating cycle.
Note 7: Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive
potential common shares, which includes the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock
grants. Dilutive potential common shares for all periods presented are computed utilizing the
treasury stock method. In the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we have excluded 1,219,237 and 356,700 stock options, respectively,
with exercise prices greater than the average market price of the underlying common stock, because
their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, we have excluded 183,104 and 90,503 of unvested shares of restricted stock,
respectively, whose combined unamortized fair value and excess tax benefits were greater in each of
those periods than the average market price for our common stock, as their effect would be
anti-dilutive.
12
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per- share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
BASIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding for basic |
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding on a diluted basis |
|
|
13,831 |
|
|
|
14,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8: Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The components of comprehensive (loss) income are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translations (1) |
|
|
(1,868 |
) |
|
|
7,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,072 |
) |
|
$ |
10,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The foreign currency translation loss of $1.9 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro. The foreign
currency translation gain of $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was due
to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro. The U.S. dollar/Euro spot rate was 1.33
and 1.39 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and 1.58 and 1.46 at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
Note 9: Revolving Credit Line
We have a $15 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (Credit Facility) with Comerica Bank,
which expires on August 31, 2009. Under the Credit Facility, the interest payable is variable and
is based on the banks cost of funds or 12-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin of 1.25%. The interest
rate in effect as of March 31, 2009 using 12-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin of 1.25% was 3.22%. We
pay a commitment fee ranging from zero to a maximum rate of 0.25% per year on the unused portion of
the credit line depending on the amount of cash investment retained with Comerica during each
quarter. At March 31, 2009, the commitment fee rate was 0.25%. Under the terms of the Credit
Facility, dividend payments are allowed for up to 100% of the prior fiscal years net income, to be
paid within 90 days of the current fiscal year end. We are subject to certain financial covenants
related to our net worth, quick ratio and net income. Amounts available for borrowing under the
Credit Facility are reduced by the outstanding balance of import letters of credit. As of March 31,
2009, we did not have any outstanding import letters of credit and the available balance on the
line of credit was $15 million. Furthermore, as of March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all
financial covenants required by the Credit Facility.
Under our Credit Facility, we were authorized to acquire up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock
in the open market. Effective February 26, 2009, Comerica amended our Credit Facility by
authorizing an additional 1,000,000 shares to be repurchased, capped at a maximum cost of $13.0
million. Given our closing stock price at March 31, 2009, we were authorized to repurchase
2,718,232 million shares. As of March 31, 2009, we have purchased 1,791,529 shares of our common
stock, leaving 926,703 shares available for purchase under the Credit Facility.
Presently, we have no borrowings under this Credit Facility, however we cannot make any assurances
that we will not need to borrow amounts under this facility or that this facility will be extended
to us beyond its expiration date of August 31, 2009 under comparable terms or at all. If this or
any other credit facility is not available to us at a time
13
when we need to borrow, we would have to use our cash reserves, which could have a material adverse
effect on our earnings, cash flow and financial position.
Note 10: Other Accrued Expenses
The components of other accrued expenses at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accrued freight |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
Accrued advertising and marketing |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
Accrued third-party commissions |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Accrued sales and VAT taxes |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other accrued expenses |
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
|
$ |
6,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11: Treasury Stock
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we repurchased 105,311 and 500,000 shares of
our common stock at a cost of $1.6 million and $11.5 million, respectively. Repurchased shares are
recorded as shares held in treasury at cost. We generally hold these shares for future use as our
management and Board of Directors deem appropriate, which may include compensating outside
directors and executives of the Company. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we
issued 6,250 and 5,000 shares, respectively, to outside directors for services performed (see Note
2).
Note 12: Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Under the requirements of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, the unit of accounting for
goodwill is at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. SFAS 142 defines a reporting
unit as either (1) an operating segment as defined in SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information or (2) one level below an operating segment referred to as a
component. Our domestic and international components are reporting units within our single
operating segment Core Business. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment as of December 31st of each
year and between annual evaluations, if events occur or circumstances change indicating that it is
more likely than not the fair value of a reporting unit has been reduced below its carrying amount.
Goodwill related to the domestic component was the result of our acquisition of a remote control
company in 1998, a software company (SimpleDevices, Inc.) in 2004 and certain assets and
intellectual property from Zilog, Inc. in the first quarter of 2009. Goodwill related to our
international component resulted from the acquisition of remote control distributors in the UK in
1998, Spain in 1999 and France in 2000.
The goodwill amounts related to our domestic and international components at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States (1) |
|
$ |
11,216 |
|
|
$ |
8,314 |
|
International (2) |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,555 |
|
|
$ |
10,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we acquired certain assets and intellectual property
from Zilog, Inc. which resulted in $2.9 million of goodwill. Refer to Note 16 for further
discussion related to the purchase. |
|
(2) |
|
The difference in international goodwill reported at March 31, 2009, as compared to the
goodwill reported at December 31, 2008, is the result of fluctuations in the foreign
currency exchange rates used to translate the balance into U.S. dollars. |
14
Our other intangible assets consist primarily of distribution rights, patents, trademarks,
purchased technologies and capitalized software development costs. Capitalized amounts related to
our patents represent external legal costs incurred for their applications and maintenance.
Intangible assets are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over our estimated period of
benefit, ranging from one to fifteen years.
Detailed information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
Carrying amount: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights (10 years) |
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
Patents (10 years) |
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
7,115 |
|
Trademark and trade names (10 years) |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
Developed and core technology (5-15 years) (2) |
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
Capitalized software development costs (1-2 years) |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
Customer relationships (15 years) (3) |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying amount |
|
$ |
17,811 |
|
|
$ |
11,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
Patents |
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
Trademark and trade names |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Developed and core technology |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated amortization |
|
$ |
5,797 |
|
|
$ |
5,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights |
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
Patents |
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
Trademark and trade names |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Developed and core technology |
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net carrying amount |
|
$ |
12,014 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This table excludes fully amortized intangible assets of $5.9 million as of March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we purchased core technology from Zilog, Inc. valued
at $3.5 million, which is being amortized ratably over 15 years. Refer to Note 16 for
further discussion regarding the purchase. |
|
(3) |
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we purchased customer relationships from Zilog, Inc.
valued at $3.1 million, which is being amortized ratably over 15 years. Refer to Note 16
for further discussion regarding the purchase. |
Amortization expense is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, except for
capitalized software development amortization which is recorded in cost of sales. Amortization
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $0.1 million and $0.4
million, respectively.
15
Estimated future amortization expense related to our other intangible assets at March 31, 2009 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2009 (remaining 9 months) |
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,664 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,315 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,294 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,294 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The fair value adjustments for intangibles measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during
the quarter ended March 31, 2009 were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
Total |
|
Description |
|
3/31/09 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
Patents |
|
$ |
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
In accordance with SFAS 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, two
patents with a carrying amount of $4 thousand were disposed of, resulting in impairment charges of
$4 thousand during the first quarter of 2009, which was included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. These assets no longer held any probable future economic benefits and were
written-off. For further information about the valuation methodology utilized, see Note 2 under the
caption Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 13: Business Segment and Foreign Operations
Business Segment
SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, defines an
operating segment, in part, as a component of an enterprise whose operating results are regularly
reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to
the segment and assess its performance. Operating segments may be aggregated only to the limited
extent permitted by the standard. We currently operate in one business segment Core Business.
16
Foreign Operations
Our sales to external customers by geographic area were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
46,723 |
|
|
$ |
32,359 |
|
International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia |
|
|
10,032 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
5,608 |
|
Germany |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
South Africa |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
Australia |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
France |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
Spain |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
Switzerland |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
2,923 |
|
All Other |
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
3,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
|
24,403 |
|
|
|
28,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
71,126 |
|
|
$ |
61,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific identification of the customers location was the basis used for attributing revenues from
external customers to individual countries.
Long-lived asset information by our domestic and international components is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Long-lived tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
5,846 |
|
|
$ |
6,525 |
|
International |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,622 |
|
|
$ |
9,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14: Derivatives
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements for assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 applies when other accounting
pronouncements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Accordingly,
SFAS 157 does not require new fair value measurements. Effective January 1, 2008, we implemented
the requirements of SFAS 157.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date
(exit price). SFAS 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following
hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or |
|
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, or |
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability |
17
Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
We are exposed to market risks from foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our
operating results and financial position. Our foreign currency exposures are primarily concentrated
in the Euro, British Pound, and Hong Kong dollar. We periodically enter into foreign currency
exchange contracts with terms normally lasting less than nine months to protect against the adverse
effects that exchange-rate fluctuations may have on our foreign currency-denominated receivables,
payables, cash flows and reported income. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk
and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes. We do not use leveraged derivative
financial instruments and these derivatives have not qualified for hedge accounting.
The gains and losses on both the derivatives and the foreign currency-denominated balances are
recorded as foreign exchange transaction gains or losses and are classified in other (expense)
income, net. Derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The estimated fair values
of our derivative financial instruments represent the amount required to enter into offsetting
contracts with similar remaining maturities based on quoted market prices.
We have determined that the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities are derived from
Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The following table sets forth our financial assets
that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Ended |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
3/31/09 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Foreign currency exchange futures contract |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We held foreign currency exchange contracts which resulted in a net pre-tax loss of approximately
$0.6 million and a net pre-tax gain of approximately $0.6 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Futures Contracts
We held one US dollar/Euro futures contract with a notional value of $4.0 million and a forward
rate of $1.3527 USD/Euro at March 31, 2009. We held the Euro position on this contract, which
settled on April 24, 2009. The loss on this contract as of March 31, 2009 was $73 thousand and is
included in accrued expenses. This contract was settled at a loss of $183 thousand resulting in an
incremental loss of $110 thousand in the month of April 2009.
We held one US dollar/Euro futures contract with a notional value of $9.0 million and a forward
rate of $1.277 USD/Euro at December 31, 2008. We held the Euro position on this contract, which
settled on January 7, 2009. The gain on this contract as of December 31, 2008 was $0.8 million and
was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. This contract was settled at $0.4
million, resulting in a loss of $0.4 million in January 2009.
Put Option
During the first quarter of 2009, we did not enter into any put option contracts.
In August 2008, we entered into a USD/GBP put option with a notional value of $5.0 million. That
contract expired on December 31, 2008 and settled on January 5, 2009. The fair value of this put
option was approximately $0.6 million at December 31, 2008, which was included in prepaid expenses
and other current assets.
Note 15: Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnities
We indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State
of Delaware and we have entered into Indemnification Agreements with each of our directors and
executive officers. In addition, we insure our individual directors and officers against certain
claims and attorneys fees and related expenses incurred in connection with the defense of such
claims. The amounts and types of coverage may vary from period to
18
period as dictated by market conditions. Management is not aware of any matters that require
indemnification of its officers or directors.
Product Warranties
We warrant our products against defects in materials and workmanship arising during normal use. We
service warranty claims directly through our customer service department or contracted third-party
warranty repair facilities. Our warranty period ranges up to three years. We provide for estimated
product warranty expenses, which are included in cost of sales, as we sell the related products.
Warranty expense is a forecast based on primarily historical claims experience. Actual claim costs
may differ from the amounts provided.
Changes in the liability for product warranty claim cost is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals for |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Warranties |
|
|
(in Cash or in |
|
|
Balance at |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning of |
|
|
Issued During |
|
|
Kind) During |
|
|
End of |
|
Description |
|
Period |
|
|
the Period |
|
|
the Period |
|
|
Period |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
86 |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
Purchase Obligations
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we entered into an agreement with a vendor to purchase a
minimum percentage of our total requirements for a component part over a five year period. The
contract allows a ramp-up period of one year. Based on our current volume, we estimate our total
financial commitment to be approximately $40 million over the five year period. As of March 31,
2009, we purchased $0.1 million in component parts from this vendor.
Litigation
In 2002, one of our subsidiaries (One For All S.A.S.) brought an action against a former
distributor of the subsidiarys products seeking a recovery of accounts receivable. The distributor
filed a counterclaim against our subsidiary seeking payment for amounts allegedly owed for
administrative and other services rendered by the distributor for our subsidiary. In January 2005,
the parties agreed to include in that action all claims between the distributor and two of our
other subsidiaries, Universal Electronics BV and One For All Iberia SL. As a result, the single
action covers all claims and counterclaims between the various parties. The parties further agreed
that, before any judgment is paid, all disputes between the various parties would be concluded.
These additional claims involve nonpayment for products and damages resulting from the alleged
wrongful termination of agency agreements. On March 15, 2005, the court in one of the litigation
matters brought by the distributor against one of our subsidiaries, rendered judgment against our
subsidiary and awarded damages and costs to the distributor in the amount of approximately
$102,000. The amount of this judgment was charged to operations during the second quarter of 2005
and has been paid. With respect to the remaining matters before the court, we are awaiting the
expert to finalize and file his pre-trial report with the court and when completed, we will
respond. Management is unable to estimate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, and the amount
of loss, if any, in the case of an unfavorable outcome.
On February 7, 2008, we filed suit against Gibson Audio, a Division of Gibson Guitar Corp., Gibson
Guitar Corp., and Gibson Musical Instruments, Inc. seeking payment of the remaining balance of a
minimum royalty fee due us under a software agreement. On March 10, 2008, the Gibson companies
answered our complaint with a general denial of all of our allegations. Also, the Gibson companies
counterclaimed that we breached various aspects of the software agreement and that they are seeking
unspecified damages. On January 6, 2009, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment which
remains pending. On March 27, 2009, we entered into a confidential Mutual Release and Covenant Not
To Sue Agreement with the Gibson Companies in which we were paid an immaterial amount and all
claims between the parties have been settled and release with prejudice. Due confidentiality, the
amount of payment to us by the Gibson companies and the other terms of the settlement and agreement
may not be disclosed.
On February 19, 2009, we filed suit against Warren Communications News, Inc. claiming that through
the unauthorized use of embedded email tracking and intercepting software and code, Warren has
violated the Computer
19
Fraud and Abuse Act, the Stored Communications Act, and various applicable California laws. In
addition we are asking for a declaration that we are not infringing Warrens copyright to a daily
electronic publication. On March 19, 2009, Warren answered our complaint with a general denial of
all of our allegations. On the same date as filing their answer, Warren counterclaimed alleging
copyright infringement seeking unspecified damages. On or about April 13, 2009, we answered
Warrens counterclaim denying their claim of copyright infringement and asserted numerous
affirmative defenses. In addition, the initial discovery has just commenced. Thus, at this time
we are unable to estimate the likely outcome of this matter and the amount, if any, of recovery to
be awarded to any party at this time.
There are no other material pending legal proceedings, other than litigation that is incidental to
the ordinary course of our business, to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which
our respective property is the subject. We do not believe that any of the claims made against us in
any of the pending matters have merit and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.
We maintain directors and officers liability insurance to insure our individual directors and
officers against certain claims and attorneys fees and related expenses incurred in connection
with the defense of such claims.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
During the second quarter of 2007, we adopted an Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan (ELTIP). The
ELTIP provided a bonus pool for our executive management team contingent on achieving certain
performance goals during a two-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2007 and ending on
December 31, 2008. The performance goals were based on the compound annual growth rate of net sales
and earnings per diluted share during the performance period. The ELTIP had a maximum pay out of
$12 million if the highest performance goals were met. Based on our performance during 2007,
management accrued $1.0 million for bonuses under the ELTIP, however, based on the 2008 results, it
was determined that no bonus was earned under the terms of the ELTIP. As a result, we lowered our
ELTIP accrual from $1.0 million at December 31, 2007 to $0 at December 31, 2008. This adjustment
resulted in a $1.0 million benefit to pre-tax income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.
Notwithstanding the ELTIP results, our Compensation Committee decided to award a discretionary
bonus of $1.0 million, to be paid out quarterly over the next two years (2009 and 2010). The
Compensation Committee came to this decision after reviewing the economic environment and our
relative financial and operating performance. The Compensation Committee believes this bonus is in
alignment with our stockholders interests as well as our performance, and retention objectives. As
a result, on December 31, 2008 we accrued $0.5 million for this discretionary bonus which is
included in accrued compensation. The amount of a participants earned award will be paid in cash.
A participants earned award will vest in eight equal quarterly installments beginning March 31,
2009 and ending December 31, 2010. In the event a participant terminates their employment during
the service period (January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010), they will forfeit their right to
any remaining installments where the payment date has not yet occurred. The amount expensed related
to this discretionary bonus in first quarter 2009 was $0.1 million.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Weve adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of a select group of
highly compensated employees. For each plan year a participant may elect to defer compensation in
fixed dollar amounts or percentages subject to the minimums and maximums established under the
plan. Generally, an election to defer compensation is irrevocable for the entire plan year. A
participant is always fully vested in their elective deferrals and may direct these funds into
various investment options available under the plan. These investment options are utilized for
measurement purposes only, and may not represent the actual investment made by us. In this respect,
the participant is an unsecured creditor of ours. At March 31, 2009, the amounts deferred under the
plan were immaterial to our financial statements.
Defined Benefit Plan
Our India subsidiary maintains a defined benefit pension plan (India Plan) for local employees,
which is consistent with local statutes and practices. As of March 31, 2009, based on its latest
actuarial report, the pension plan was
20
adequately funded. The India Plan has an independent external manager that advises us of the
appropriate funding contribution requirements to which we comply. At March 31, 2009, approximately
20 percent of our India subsidiary employees had qualified for eligibility. Generally, an employee
must be employed by the company for a minimum of five years before becoming eligible. At the time
of eligibility we are liable, on termination, resignation or retirement, to pay the employee an
effective amount of fifteen days salary for each full year of service completed. The total amount
of liability outstanding at March 31, 2009 for the India Plan is not material. During the three
months ended March 31, 2009 the net periodic benefit costs were also not material.
Note 16: Business Acquisition
On February 18, 2009, we acquired certain patents, intellectual property and other assets related
to the universal remote control business from Zilog, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZILG) for approximately $9.5
million in cash. The purchase included Zilogs full library and database of infrared codes,
software tools and certain fixed assets. We also hired 115 of Zilogs sales and engineering
personnel, including all 103 of Zilogs personnel located in India. In a related transaction, Maxim
Integrated Products (NASDAQ: MXIM) acquired two of Zilogs product lines, namely, the hardware
portion of Zilogs remote control business and Zilogs secured transaction product line.
We have crosslicensed the remote control technology and intellectual property with Maxim
Integrated Products for purpose of conducting our respective businesses. The arrangement involves
an agreement to source silicon chips from Maxim. For the first year we will be the exclusive sales
agent of universal remote control chips for Maxim, selling the Zilog designs to Zilogs former
customers. We expect this arrangement to be mildly accretive to our earnings in 2009. Beginning in
the second year, we will take over full sales and distribution rights to Zilogs former customers,
and we anticipate this position will lead to growth in revenue and earnings going forward. Our
consolidated financial statements include the operating results of the acquired assets, employees
hired, and the related agreement with Maxim from February 18, 2009. We recognized $0.6 million of
net revenue and earnings of $0.2 million related to the transaction during the quarter-ended March
31, 2009, excluding acquisition costs of $1.1 million.
The total purchase price of approximately $9.5 million has been allocated to the net assets
acquired based on their estimated fair values as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Database |
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
3,100 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,902 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
$ |
9,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization
Of the total purchase price, approximately $6.6 million was allocated to intangible assets subject
to amortization including the database and customer relationships.
The database intangible is composed of the estimated fair value of patents, intellectual property
and other assets related to Zilogs database of infrared codes, and software tools. When
determining the fair value of the database, we utilized the cost approach. In our valuation, we
estimated the total costs to recreate the database, including the associated opportunity costs (or
revenue lost while recreating). We discounted the after-tax cash flows to present value to arrive
at our estimate of the fair value of the database. We are amortizing the database on a
straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of approximately 15 years.
The customer relationship intangible is composed of the fair value of customer relationships
acquired as a result of the Zilog purchase. We utilized the income approach to estimate the fair
value of the customer relationships intangible. We developed after-tax cash flows based on
forecasted revenue from these customers assuming a customer attrition rate based on our analysis of
customer data for UEI and Zilog. We discounted the after-tax cash
21
flows to present value to arrive at our estimate of the fair value of the customer relationships
intangible. We are amortizing the customer relationships intangible on a straight-line basis over
an estimated useful life of approximately 15 years.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost (purchase price) over the estimated fair value of
identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill from this transaction of
$2.9 million will not be amortized, but will be analyzed for impairment at least on an annual basis
in accordance with SFAS No. 142. We review our goodwill for impairment annually as of December 31
and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred.
Of the total goodwill recorded, none is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The goodwill recognized is attributable to the following value we received from this acquisition:
|
|
|
This acquisition will expand the breadth and depth of our customer base in both
subscription broadcasting and original equipment manufacturing, particularly in Asia. |
|
|
|
|
We believe integrating Zilogs technologies with and into our own technology will reduce
design cycle times, lower costs, and lead to improvements in our integrated circuit design,
product quality and overall functional performance. |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of former Zilog employees will allow us to leverage their experience to our
advantage in the wireless control industry. |
Acquisition Costs
We recognized $1.1 million of total costs related to the Zilog transaction in selling, general and
administrative expenses during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The acquisition costs consisted of
primarily legal and investment banking services. Of the $1.1 million of transaction costs
recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, $0.1 million was capitalized at December 31,
2008.
Pro forma Results (Unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of our
operations and the operations of the acquisition from Zilog as if the acquisition had occurred at
the beginning of the periods presented. Adjustments of $0.1 million for the quarter-ended ended
March 31, 2009 have been made to the combined results of operations, reflecting primarily
amortization of purchased intangible assets, net of tax. Adjustments of $0.7 million for the
quarter-ended March 31, 2008 have been made to the combined results of operations, reflecting
primarily amortization of purchased intangible assets, net of tax and the acquisition costs, net of
tax.
Pro forma results were as follows for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Net Sales: |
|
$ |
71,613 |
|
|
$ |
62,316 |
|
Net income: |
|
$ |
757 |
|
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
Basic and diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the
consolidated results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisition actually been
completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as a projection of the future
consolidated results of our operations.
22
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
Overview
We have developed a broad line of pre-programmed universal wireless control products and
audio-video accessories that are marketed to enhance home entertainment systems. Our customers
operate in the consumer electronics market and include OEMs, MSOs (cable and satellite service
providers), international retailers, CEDIA (Custom Electronic Design and Installation Association),
U.S. retailers, private labels, and companies in the computing industry. We also sell integrated
circuits, on which our software and IR code database is embedded, to OEMs that manufacture wireless
control devices, cable converters or satellite receivers for resale in their products. We believe
that our universal remote control database contains device codes that are capable of controlling
virtually all infrared remote (IR) controlled TVs, VCRs, DVD players, cable converters, CD
players, audio components and satellite receivers, as well as most other infrared remote controlled
devices worldwide.
Beginning in 1986 and continuing today, we have compiled an extensive library that covers over
405,000 individual device functions and over 3,600 individual consumer electronic equipment brand
names. Our library is regularly updated with IR codes used in newly introduced video and audio
devices. All IR codes are captured from the original manufacturers remote control devices or
manufacturers specifications to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the database. We have also
developed patented technologies that provide the capability to easily upgrade the memory of the
wireless control device by adding IR codes from the library that were not originally included.
We have twelve subsidiaries located in Argentina, Cayman Islands, France, Germany (2), Hong Kong,
India, Italy, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain and the United Kingdom.
To recap our results for first quarter 2009:
|
|
|
Our revenue grew 16.2% from $61.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to $71.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
Our sales growth in the first quarter 2009 was the result of strong
demand from the customers in our business category, due in part to the
continuation of the upgrade cycle from analog to digital, consumer
demand for advanced-function offerings from subscription broadcasters,
increased share with existing customers, and new customer wins. |
|
|
|
|
Our operating income for the first three months of 2009 decreased
42.7% to $1.5 million from operating income of $2.7 million in the
first three months of 2008. Our operating margin percentage decreased
from 4.4% in the first three months of 2008 to 2.1% in the first three
months of 2009 due primarily to the decrease in our gross margin
percentage offset partially by the decrease in operating expenses as a
percentage of revenue. Our gross margin percentage decreased from
35.5% in the first three months of 2008 to 30.1% in the first three
months of 2009. The decrease in our gross margin rate was due
primarily to sales mix, as a higher percentage of our total sales was
comprised of our lower-margin Business category. In addition, sales
mix within our sales categories also contributed to the decrease in
our gross margin rate as consumers trended towards value-oriented
products. The weakening of the Euro and British pound also contributed
to the decline in our gross margin percentage. Operating expenses
decreased from 31.1% of revenue for the three months ended March 31,
2008 to 28.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2009, despite
incurring $1.1 million of deal related costs in the first quarter of
2009 relating to the acquisition of remote control related assets from
Zilog, Inc. |
23
Our strategic business objectives for 2009 include the following:
|
|
|
increase our share with existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
acquire new customers in historically strong regions; |
|
|
|
|
continue our expansion into new regions, Asia in particular; |
|
|
|
|
continue to develop industry-leading technologies and products; and |
|
|
|
|
continue to evaluate potential acquisition and joint venture opportunities that may enhance our business. |
We intend the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations to provide
information that will assist in understanding our consolidated financial statements, the changes in
certain key items in those financial statements from period to period, and the primary factors that
accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates
affect our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition, allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, warranties,
inventory valuation, business combination purchase price allocations, our review for impairment of
long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes and stock-based compensation
expense. Actual results may differ from these judgments and estimates, and they may be adjusted as
more information becomes available. Any adjustment may be significant.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made
based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if
different estimates reasonably may have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are
reasonably likely to occur may materially impact the financial statements. We do not believe that
there have been any significant changes during the three months ended March 31, 2009 to the items
that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting
pronouncements.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2008:
Net sales by our Business and Consumer lines for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
|
% of total |
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
|
% of total |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
% |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
71.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
61.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
Net sales for the first quarter of 2009 were $71.1 million, an increase of 16% compared to $61.2
million for the first quarter of 2008. Net income for the first quarter of 2009 was $0.8 million or
$0.06 per diluted share compared to $2.5 million or $0.17 per diluted share for the first quarter
of 2008.
Consolidated
Net sales in our Business lines (subscription broadcasting, OEM and computing companies) were
approximately 86% of net sales in the first quarter of 2009 compared to approximately 79% in the
first quarter of 2008. Net sales in our Business lines for the first quarter of 2009 increased by
26% to $60.9 million from $48.3 million in the first quarter of 2008. This increase in sales
resulted primarily from an increase in the volume of remote control sales, which was partially
offset by lower prices. The increase in remote control sales volume was attributable to the
continued deployment of advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators, market share
gains with a few key subscription broadcast customers and new customer wins. These advanced
functions include digital video recording (DVR), video-on-demand (VOD), and high definition
television (HDTV). We expect that the deployment of the advanced function set-top boxes by the
service operators will continue into the foreseeable future as penetration for each of the
functions cited continues to increase.
Net sales in our Consumer lines (One For All® retail, private label, custom installers and direct
import) were approximately 14% of net sales for the first quarter of 2009 compared to approximately
21% for the first quarter of 2008. Net sales in our Consumer lines decreased by 21% to $10.2
million for the first quarter of 2009, from $12.9 million in the first quarter of 2008. European
retail sales decreased by $3.0 million compared to the first quarter of 2008. Europe retail sales
were unfavorably impacted by the weakening of both the Euro and the British Pound compared to the
U.S. Dollar, which resulted in a decrease in net sales of approximately $2.0 million. Net of this
currency effect, European retail sales decreased $1.0 million, primarily due to the downturn of the
economy in the United Kingdom. Private label sales in the U.S. decreased $0.5 million, to $0.1
million in the first quarter of 2009 from $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. This was
driven by a decline in the volume of remote control sales to our private label partners. Partially
offsetting these decreases were the North American retail sales, which increased by $0.4 million
compared to the first quarter of 2008, as a result of a new partnership agreement with a
distributor in the U.S market. CEDIA sales increased by $0.4 million compared to the first quarter
of 2008, primarily due to the launch of a new product that occurred in the second quarter of 2008.
Gross profit for the first quarter of 2009 was $21.4 million compared to $21.7 million for the
first quarter of 2008. Gross profit as a percent of sales for the first quarter of 2009 was 30.1%
compared to 35.5% for the same period in the prior year, due primarily to the following reasons:
|
|
|
Sales mix, as a higher percentage of our total sales was comprised of our lower margin
Business category. In addition, sales mix within our sales categories also contributed to
the decrease in our gross margin rate as consumers trended towards value-oriented products.
Collectively, the aforementioned resulted in a decrease of 2.7% in the gross margin rate; |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency fluctuations caused a decrease of 1.8% in the gross margin rate; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in scrap expense caused a decrease of 0.8% in the gross margin rate. |
Research and development expenses decreased 4% from $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2008 to
$2.1 million in the first quarter of 2009, relatively consistent with prior year levels.
25
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 6% from $16.9 million in the first quarter
of 2008 to $17.8 million in the first quarter of 2009. The weakening of the Euro compared to the
U.S. Dollar resulted in a decrease of $1.0 million. Net of this favorable currency effect, expenses
increased by $1.9 million. Legal, accounting, and advisory professional service expense increased
by $1.1 million, due to the acquisition of assets from Zilog, Inc, which was completed during the
first quarter. Payroll and fringe expense increased by $0.6 million. Employee bonus expense
increased $0.2 million, and long-term incentive compensation expense increased $0.2 million. These
increases were partially offset by lower freight expense, which decreased by $0.2 million, and
commission expense, which decreased by $0.1 million.
In the first quarter of 2009, we recorded $0.1 million of net interest income compared to $0.9
million in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease is primarily due to significantly lower interest
rates.
In the first quarter of 2009, net other expense was $0.4 million as compared to net other income of
$0.2 million for the first quarter of 2008 which was driven by foreign exchange losses.
We recorded income tax expense of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to $1.3
million in the first quarter of 2008. Our effective tax rate was 39.1% in the first quarter of 2009
compared to 34.3% in the first quarter of 2008. The increase in our effective tax rate is due
to fixed interest expense on tax contingencies representing a higher
percentage of pre-tax income coupled with a higher percentage of
income earned in higher tax rate jurisdictions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
(Decrease)/ |
|
Three months ended |
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Increase in cash |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
3,395 |
|
|
$ |
(2,183 |
) |
|
$ |
5,578 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(59,330 |
) |
|
|
(56,616 |
) |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
9,824 |
|
|
|
(11,212 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
(5,682 |
) |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,357 |
|
|
$ |
(57,881 |
) |
|
$ |
75,238 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
112,321 |
|
|
|
(9,982 |
) |
|
|
122,303 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $2.2 million from $5.6 million in the first
quarter 2008 to $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in cash provided by
operating activities was primarily driven by the decrease in net income from approximately $2.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to approximately $0.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. Total working capital requirements were relatively consistent for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Net cash used for investing activities for the first three months of 2009 was $59.3 million
compared to $2.7 million for the first three months of 2008. The increase in cash used for
investing activities was primarily due to the acquisition of intangible assets and goodwill of $9.5
million from Zilog, Inc. and our term deposit of $48.9 million, offset by a decrease in the
acquisition of equipment, furniture, and fixtures. The purchase of equipment, furniture and
fixtures decreased as a result of the renovation of our corporate headquarters being completed
during the first quarter of 2008. Refer to Note 16 for further discussion about our purchase of
assets from Zilog, Inc.
We plan to make a significant investment to upgrade our information systems, which we expect to
cost approximately $1.0 million. We expect implementation to be completed in 2010. In addition, in
order to support our future sales growth, we expect annual purchases of tooling equipment to
increase.
Net cash used for financing activities for the first three months of 2009 was $1.4 million as
compared to $11.2 million in the first three months of 2008. We repurchased fewer shares of our
common stock during the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008. During the
first quarter of 2009 we repurchased 105,311 shares of our common stock for $1.6 million compared
to our repurchase of 500,000 shares of our common stock for $11.5
26
million during the first quarter of 2008. We hold repurchased shares as treasury stock and they are
available for reissue. Presently, except for using a small number of these treasury shares to
compensate our outside board members, we have no plans to distribute these shares. However, we may
change these plans if necessary to fulfill our on-going business objectives.
We have a Credit Facility with Comerica which expires on August 31, 2009. Under our Credit
Facility, we were authorized to acquire up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock in the open
market. Effective February 26, 2009, Comerica amended our Credit Facility by authorizing an
additional 1,000,000 shares to be repurchased, capped at a maximum cost of $13.0 million. Given our
closing stock price at March 31, 2009, we were authorized to repurchase 2,718,232 million shares.
As of March 31, 2009, we have purchased 1,791,529 shares of our common stock, leaving 926,703
shares available for purchase under the Credit Facility. During 2009 we may continue to purchase
shares of our common stock if we believe conditions are favorable and to offset the dilutive effect
of our equity compensation programs.
Presently, we have no borrowings under this Credit Facility, however we cannot make any assurances
that we will not need to borrow amounts under this facility or that this facility will continue to
be extended to us under comparable terms or at all. If this or any other credit facility is not
available to us at a time when we need to borrow, we would have to use our cash reserves which
could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, cash flow and financial position.
We have a six month term deposit cash account in Hong Kong with ABN Amro Bank. The term began on
January 13, 2009 and ends on July 13, 2009. The term deposit earns interest at a rate of 1.05%. The
interest is receivable on July 13, 2009. The deposit amount and accrued interest related to this
account as of March 31, 2009 was $48.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively. If we were to
withdraw the funds prior to the end of the term a penalty will be assessed only if the interest
rate on the date of withdrawal is higher than the rate on January 13, 2009. The penalty amount is
equal to the interest the bank will have to pay another depositor with the same principal balance
over the remaining term using the rate in effect on the withdrawal date, less the interest the bank
would have had to pay us.
Contractual Obligations
At March 31, 2009, our contractual obligations were $65.5 million compared to $66.0 million
reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008. The following table summarizes
our contractual obligations at March 31, 2009 and the effect these obligations are expected to have
on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
4-5 |
|
|
After |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
$ |
4,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
2,406 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase obligations(1) |
|
|
60,645 |
|
|
|
8,085 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
21,520 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
65,524 |
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
$ |
29,446 |
|
|
$ |
22,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchase obligations include contractual payments to purchase minimum quantities of
inventory under vendor agreements. |
Liquidity
Weve utilized cash provided from operations as our primary source of liquidity, since internally
generated cash flows have been sufficient to support our business operations, capital expenditures
and discretionary share repurchases. We are able to supplement this near term liquidity, if
necessary, with our Credit Facility, as discussed below.
Historically, our working capital needs have been greatest during the third and fourth quarters
when accounts receivable and inventories increase in connection with the fourth quarter holiday
selling season. At March 31, 2009, we had $112.3 million of working capital as compared to $122.3
million at December 31, 2008.
27
Our cash and cash equivalent balances are held in the United States, Europe and Asia. At March 31,
2009, we had approximately $5.9 million, $8.7 million, and $2.8 million of cash and cash
equivalents in the United States, Europe and Asia, respectively. In addition, we had a term deposit
of $48.9 million in Asia. We maintain our cash, cash equivalents, and term deposits with various
financial institutions located in many different geographic regions. We attempt to mitigate our
exposure to interest rate, liquidity, credit and other relevant risks by placing our cash and cash
equivalents with financial institutions we believe are high quality.
We have a $15 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (Credit Facility) with Comerica Bank,
which expires on August 31, 2009. Under the Credit Facility, the interest payable is variable and
is based on the banks cost of funds or 12-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin of 1.25%. The interest
rate in effect as of March 31, 2009 using 12-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin of 1.25% was 3.22%. We
pay a commitment fee ranging from zero to a maximum rate of 1/4 of 1% per year on the unused
portion of the credit line depending on the amount of cash investment retained with Comerica during
each quarter. At March 31, 2009, the commitment fee rate was 0.25%. Under the terms of the Credit
Facility, dividend payments are allowed for up to 100% of the prior fiscal years net income, to be
paid within 90 days of the current fiscal year end. We are subject to certain financial covenants
related to our net worth, quick ratio and net income. Amounts available for borrowing under the
Credit Facility are reduced by the outstanding balance of import letters of credit. As of March 31,
2009, we did not have any outstanding import letters of credit and the available balance on the
line of credit was $15 million. Furthermore, as of March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all
financial covenants required by the Credit Facility.
It is our policy to carefully monitor the state of our business, cash requirements and capital
structure. As previously mentioned, we believe that cash generated from our operations and, so long
as our Credit Facility is available, funds from our borrowing facility will be sufficient to fund
our current business operations and anticipated growth at least over the next twelve months;
however, there can be no assurance that such funds will be adequate for that purpose. In addition,
our Credit Facility is set to expire on August 31, 2009 and we cannot make any assurances that our
Credit Facility will be extended to us beyond its expiration date of August 31, 2009 under
comparable terms or at all. If this or any other credit facility is not available to us at a time
when we need to borrow, we would have to use our cash reserves which could have a material adverse
effect on our earnings, cash flow and financial position.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not participate in any off balance sheet arrangements.
Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results
Forward Looking Statements
We caution that the following important factors, among others (including but not limited to factors
discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, as well as those discussed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, or in our other
reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission), may affect our actual
results and may contribute to or cause our actual consolidated results to differ materially from
those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. The factors included here are not
exhaustive. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible
for management to predict all such factors, nor can we assess the impact of each such factor on the
business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Therefore,
forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual future results.
While we believe that the forward-looking statements made in this report are based on reasonable
assumptions, the actual outcome of such statements is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including the following:
28
|
|
|
the failure of our markets or customers to continue growing and expanding in the manner we
anticipated; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of natural or other events beyond our control, including the effects a war or
terrorist activities may have on us, the economy or our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the growth of, acceptance of and the demand for our products and technologies in various
markets and geographical regions, including cable, satellite, consumer electronics, retail,
digital media/technology, CEDIA, interactive TV, automotive, and cellular industries not
materializing or growing as we believed; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain orders or maintain our order volume with new and existing
customers; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to add profitable complementary products which are accepted by the
marketplace; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to continue selling our products or licensing our technologies at higher or
profitable margins; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to continue to maintain our operating costs at acceptable levels through our
cost containment efforts; |
|
|
|
|
the possible dilutive effect our stock incentive programs may have on our earnings per
share and stock price; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to continue to obtain adequate quantities of component parts or secure
adequate factory production capacity on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to successfully integrate any strategic business transaction; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors listed from time to time in our press releases and filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Outlook
Our focus is to build technology and products that make the consumers interaction with devices and
content within the home easier and more enjoyable. The pace of change in the home is increasing.
The growth of new devices, such as DVD players, PVR/DVR technologies, HDTV and home theater
solutions, to name only a few, has transformed control of the home entertainment center into a
complex challenge for the consumer. The more recent introduction and projected growth of digital
media technologies in the consumers life will further increase this complexity. We have set out to
create the interface for the connected home, building a bridge between the home devices of today
and the networked home of the future. We intend to invest in new products and technology,
particularly in the connected home space, which will expand our business beyond the control of
devices to the control of and access to content, such as digital media, to enrich the entertainment
experience.
We will continue enhancing our leadership position in our core business by developing custom
products for our subscription broadcasting, OEM, retail and computing customers, growing our
capture expertise in infrared technology and radio frequency standards, adding to our portfolio of
patented or patent pending technologies and developing new platform products. We are also
developing new ways to enhance remote controls and other accessory products.
We are continuing to seek ways to use our technology to make the set-up and use of control
products, and the access to and control of digital entertainment within the home entertainment
network, easier and more affordable. In addition, we are working on product line extensions to our
One For All® branded products which include digital antennas, signal boosters, and other
A/V accessories.
We are also seeking ways to increase our customer base worldwide, particularly in the areas of
subscription broadcasting, OEM and One For All® retail. We will continue to work on
strengthening existing relationships by working with customers to understand how to make the
consumer interaction with products and services within the home easier and more enjoyable. We
intend to invest in new products and technology to meet our customer needs now and into the future.
We will continue developing software and firmware solutions that can enable devices such as TVs,
set-top boxes, stereos, automotive audio systems and other consumer electronic products to
wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and interactive services to deliver digital
entertainment and information. This smart device category is emerging, and in the remainder of
2009 we look to continue to build relationships with our customers in this category.
Throughout 2009, we will continue to evaluate acceptable acquisition targets and strategic
partnership opportunities in our core business lines as well as in the networked home marketplace.
We caution, however, that no assurance can be made that any suitable acquisition target or
partnership opportunity will be identified and, if identified, that a transaction can be
consummated. Moreover, if consummated, no assurance can be made that any such acquisition or
partnership will profitably add to our operations.
29
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various market risks, including interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations. We have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our
management of these risks and the use of financial instruments to mitigate our risk exposure.
We have a Credit Facility expiring on August 31, 2009. The interest payable under our revolving
Credit Facility with our bank is variable and based on (i) the banks cost of funds or (ii) the
12-month LIBOR rate plus a fixed margin of 1.25%. The cost of the Credit Facility is affected by
changes in market interest rates, credit risk spreads and credit availability. The interest rate in
effect on the credit facility as of March 31, 2009 using the 12-month LIBOR Rate option plus a
fixed margin of 1.25% was 3.22%.
At March 31, 2009, we had no borrowings on our Credit Facility, however we cannot make any
assurances that we will not need to borrow amounts under this facility or that this facility will
be extended to us beyond its expiration date of August 31, 2009 under comparable terms or at all.
If this or any other credit facility is not available to us at a time when we need to borrow, we
would have to use our cash reserves which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings,
cash flow and financial position.
At March 31, 2009, we had wholly owned subsidiaries in the Argentina, Cayman Islands, France,
Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, and the United Kingdom. On
February 18, 2009, we acquired certain patents, intellectual property and other assets related to
the universal remote control business from Zilog, Inc. (Zilog NASDAQ: ZILG) for approximately
$9.5 million in cash. In connection with this transaction, we formed our Cayman Islands subsidiary.
Sales are typically denominated in local currencies, thereby creating exposure to changes in
exchange rates. Changes in local currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar and, in some
cases, to each other, may positively or negatively affect our sales, gross margins, operating
expenses and net income. The value of our net balance sheet positions held in foreign currencies
may also be impacted by fluctuating exchange rates.
From time to time, we enter into foreign currency exchange agreements to manage our exposure
arising from fluctuating exchange rates that affect cash flows and our reported income. Contract
terms for the foreign currency exchange agreements normally last less than nine months. We do not
enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. It is difficult to estimate the
impact of fluctuations on reported income, as it depends on the opening and closing rates, the
average net balance sheet positions held in a foreign currency and the amount of income generated
in local currency. We routinely forecast what these balance sheet positions and income generated in
local currency may be, and we take steps to minimize exposure as we deem appropriate.
Our foreign currency exposures are primarily concentrated in the Euro, British Pound and Hong Kong
Dollars. The sensitivity of earnings and cash flows to the variability in exchange rates is
assessed by applying an approximate range of potential rate fluctuations to our assets, obligations
and projected results of operations denominated in foreign currency. Based on our overall foreign
currency rate exposure at March 31, 2009, we believe that movements in foreign currency rates could
have a material affect on our financial position. We estimate that if the exchange rates for the
Euro and the British Pound relative to the U.S. Dollar fluctuate 10% from March 31, 2009, net
income and cash flows in the second quarter of 2009 would fluctuate by approximately $0.5 million
and $6.1 million, respectively.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) defines disclosure controls and procedures to mean controls and
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms. The
definition further states that disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
30
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our principal executive and principal financial officers, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officers
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the
period covered by this report, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth above under Note 15 contained in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The reader should carefully consider, in connection with the other information in this report, the
factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 9 through 16 of the Companys 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporated herein by reference. These factors could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those stated in forward-looking statements contained in this
document and elsewhere.
31
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we did not sell any equity securities that were not
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Under our Credit Facility, we were authorized to acquire up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock
in the open market. Effective February 26, 2009, Comerica amended our Credit Facility by
authorizing an additional 1,000,000 shares to be repurchased, capped at a maximum cost of $13.0
million. Given our closing stock price at March 31, 2009, we were authorized to repurchase
2,718,232 million shares. As of March 31, 2009, we have purchased 1,791,529 shares of our common
stock, leaving 926,703 shares available for purchase under the Credit
Facility.
We repurchased 105,311 shares during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and we may continue to
repurchase shares of our common stock during the remainder of the year, if we believe conditions
are favorable, or to manage dilution created by shares issued under our stock-based compensation
plans. Repurchase information for the first quarter of 2009 is set forth by month in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Be Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
January 1, 2009 January 31, 2009 |
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
$ |
16.33 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
February 1, 2009 February 28, 2009 |
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
15.53 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
March 1, 2009 March 31, 2009 |
|
|
92,798 |
|
|
|
15.38 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Q1 2009 |
|
|
105,311 |
|
|
$ |
15.44 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Bryan Hackworth, Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) of Universal Electronics Inc.,
and Bryan Hackworth, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer) of Universal Electronics
Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
32
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2009
|
|
Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bryan Hackworth
Bryan Hackworth
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(principal financial officer and |
|
|
|
|
principal accounting officer) |
|
|
33
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Bryan M. Hackworth, Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) of Universal Electronics
Inc., and Bryan M. Hackworth, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer) of Universal
Electronics Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
34