e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-31828
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
06-1694835 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
101 California Street, Suite 1350, San Francisco, California
|
|
94111 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(415) 217-4500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non- accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act ).
Yes
o. No þ.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding on April 30, 2007 was 46,822,244.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements under the Private Securities
litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements convey our current expectations or
forecasts of future events. All statements contained in this Form 10-Q other than statements of
historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements
regarding our financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, plans and objectives
of management for future operations. The words may continue, estimate, intend, project,
believe, expect, plan, anticipate and similar terms may identify forward-looking
statements, but the absence of such words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not
forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements about:
|
|
our ability to purchase sufficient mortgages for our securitization business; |
|
|
the flattening of, or other changes in the yield curve, on our investment strategies; |
|
|
changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment rates; |
|
|
our ability to obtain or renew sufficient funding to maintain our leverage strategies; |
|
|
continued creditworthiness of the holders of mortgages underlying our mortgage-related assets; |
|
|
the possible effect of negative amortization of mortgages on our financial condition and REIT qualification; |
|
|
potential impacts of our leveraging policies on our net income and cash available for distribution; |
|
|
the power of our board of directors to change our operating policies and strategies without
stockholder approval; |
|
|
the effects of interest rate caps on our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate loans
and mortgage-backed securities; |
|
|
the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate
volatility; |
|
|
our ability to invest up to 10% of our investment portfolio in residuals, leveraged
mortgage derivative securities and shares of other REITs as well as other investments; |
|
|
volatility in the timing and amount of our cash distributions; and |
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q may turn out to be inaccurate
and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied by our forward-looking
statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and
projections about future events and future trends that we believe may affect our financial
condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. They may be affected by
inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties.
You should not rely unduly on those forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this Form 10-Q. Unless required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation
to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information or future
events.
This Form 10-Q contains market data, industry statistics and other data that have been
obtained from, or compiled from, information made available by third parties. We have not
independently verified any third party data.
ii
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
|
7 |
|
1
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
60,343 |
|
|
$ |
5,902 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
57,445 |
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net of allowance for loan losses of $8,262 at March 31, 2007
and
$5,020 at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
5,569,169 |
|
|
|
5,591,717 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (including $65,880 of trading securities
at March 31, 2007) at fair value |
|
|
200,918 |
|
|
|
141,556 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities pledged as collateral (including $70,609 of trading securities
at March 31, 2007) at fair value |
|
|
3,052,451 |
|
|
|
2,789,382 |
|
Debt securities, at fair value |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, at fair value |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
38,117 |
|
|
|
36,736 |
|
Principal receivable |
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Derivatives, fair value |
|
|
19,401 |
|
|
|
13,021 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
52,072 |
|
|
|
25,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,053,566 |
|
|
$ |
8,613,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed notes |
|
$ |
4,273,596 |
|
|
$ |
3,917,677 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,880,678 |
|
|
|
2,707,915 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
619,022 |
|
|
|
637,677 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
270,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
403,232 |
|
|
|
752,777 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
92,788 |
|
Unsettled security purchases |
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions payable |
|
|
14,418 |
|
|
|
14,343 |
|
Accrued interest expense |
|
|
9,340 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
14,885 |
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,580,243 |
|
|
|
8,142,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
shares authorized; 47,958,510 and 47,808,510 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
584,204 |
|
|
|
583,492 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
(115,858 |
) |
|
|
(115,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
473,323 |
|
|
|
471,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
9,053,566 |
|
|
$ |
8,613,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
2
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan and securitization portfolio |
|
$ |
98,690 |
|
|
$ |
22,611 |
|
Spread portfolio |
|
|
30,376 |
|
|
|
30,965 |
|
Credit sensitive bond portfolio |
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
145,566 |
|
|
|
61,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
115,204 |
|
|
|
46,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
30,362 |
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on derivatives, net |
|
|
15,264 |
|
|
|
8,694 |
|
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1,717 |
) |
Gains (losses) on sales of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(15,453 |
) |
|
|
2,063 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
8,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
Servicing expense |
|
|
5,986 |
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due diligence expense |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
Board of directors expense |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Insurance expense |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Custody expense |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Management compensation expense to related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
Incentive compensation expense to related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
Other general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
15,242 |
|
|
|
6,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
14,847 |
|
|
|
17,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,387 |
|
|
$ |
17,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
47,316,058 |
|
|
|
39,491,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
47,427,502 |
|
|
|
39,718,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend declared per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
in Excess of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
47,809 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
583,492 |
|
|
$ |
3,842 |
|
|
$ |
(115,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
471,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,387 |
|
|
$ |
14,387 |
|
|
|
14,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale,
fair value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of derivative
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance and amortization of
restricted common stock |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
|
|
47,959 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
584,204 |
|
|
$ |
4,929 |
|
|
$ |
(115,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
473,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,387 |
|
|
$ |
17,779 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium/(discount) on loans held-for-investment and
mortgage-backed securities and depreciation |
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
Negative amortization of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(35,466 |
) |
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
(4,550 |
) |
|
|
(5,209 |
) |
Net gain (losses) on sales of mortgage-backed-securities available-for-sale |
|
|
15,453 |
|
|
|
(2,063 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable, net of purchased interest |
|
|
(1,251 |
) |
|
|
6,106 |
|
(Increase) in other assets |
|
|
(18,492 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
7,485 |
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest expense |
|
|
(2,754 |
) |
|
|
(14,774 |
) |
Increase in management compensation payable, incentive compensation
payable and other related-party payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(16,485 |
) |
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(461,640 |
) |
|
|
(1,079,321 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
14,887 |
|
|
|
3,151,447 |
|
Principal payments of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
115,838 |
|
|
|
201,647 |
|
Purchases of loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
(414,262 |
) |
|
|
(1,671,093 |
) |
Principal payments of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
460,433 |
|
|
|
21,744 |
|
Purchases of derivative instruments |
|
|
(8,880 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Proceeds from derivative instruments |
|
|
6,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in restricted cash |
|
|
(49,947 |
) |
|
|
777 |
|
Other |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(337,006 |
) |
|
|
625,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,008 |
) |
Capitalized financing costs |
|
|
(4,414 |
) |
|
|
(3,902 |
) |
Borrowings under repurchase agreements |
|
|
11,312,497 |
|
|
|
12,975,841 |
|
Principal payments on repurchase agreements |
|
|
(11,139,734 |
) |
|
|
(14,946,878 |
) |
Borrowings under warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
834,153 |
|
|
|
1,634,658 |
|
Paydown of warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
(1,183,515 |
) |
|
|
(1,375,181 |
) |
Borrowings under commercial paper facility |
|
|
1,840,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paydown of commercial paper facility |
|
|
(1,859,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders |
|
|
(14,343 |
) |
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
718,451 |
|
|
|
1,283,630 |
|
Principal payments on mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
(362,535 |
) |
|
|
(26,060 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
266,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on margin debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
407,932 |
|
|
|
(470,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
54,441 |
|
|
|
153,477 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
$ |
60,343 |
|
|
$ |
164,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
122,217 |
|
|
$ |
48,795 |
|
Taxes paid |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in unsettled security purchases |
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
$ |
179,773 |
|
(Increase) decrease in principal receivable |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
9,215 |
|
Transfer of loans held-for-investment to real estate owned |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale through collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
(3,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paydown of warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash distributions payable to stockholders |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
6
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc., or the Company, was organized as a Maryland corporation on
April 25, 2003. The Company commenced its operations on June 11, 2003 upon completion of a private
placement offering. On December 18, 2003, the Company completed the initial public offering of its
shares of common stock and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the trading
symbol LUM on December 19, 2003. On March 29, 2004 and October 12, 2006, the Company completed
follow-on public offerings of its common stock.
The Company is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, which, together with its subsidiaries,
invests in two core mortgage investment strategies. Under its Residential Mortgage Credit strategy,
the Company invests in mortgage loans purchased from selected high-quality providers within certain
established criteria as well as subordinated mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed
securities that have credit ratings below AAA. Under its Spread strategy, the Company invests
primarily in U.S. agency and other highly-rated single-family, adjustable-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. The Company operates as only one reportable segment as
defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information.
The information furnished in these unaudited condensed consolidated interim statements
reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of
the results for the periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless
otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. The results of operations in the interim statements do not
necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year. The interim financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2006 Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 16, 2007.
Descriptions of the significant accounting policies of the Company are included in Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements in the Companys 2006 Form 10-K. There have been no
significant changes to these policies during 2007 with the exception of the required adoption of
SFAS No. 155 Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 and 140. See the description of recent accounting pronouncements below.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has placed an item on its SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, project agenda relating to the treatment of
transactions where mortgage-backed securities purchased from a particular counterparty are financed
via a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty. Currently, the Company records such assets
and the related financing gross on its consolidated balance sheet, and the corresponding interest
income and interest expense gross on its consolidated statement of operations. Any change in fair
value of the security is reported through other comprehensive income or current period income,
depending on its classification under SFAS No. 115.
However, in a transaction where the mortgage-backed securities are acquired from and financed
under a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, the acquisition may not qualify as a sale
from the sellers perspective under the provisions of SFAS No. 140. In such cases, the seller may
be required to continue to consolidate the assets sold to the Company, based on the sellers
continuing involvement with such investments. Depending on the ultimate outcome of the FASB deliberations, the Company may be precluded from
presenting the assets gross on its balance sheet and may instead be required to treat its net
investment in such assets as a derivative.
This potential change in accounting treatment does not affect the economics of the
transactions but does affect how the transactions would be reported in the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The Companys cash flows, liquidity and ability to pay a dividend would be
unchanged, and it is expected that its REIT taxable income and its qualification as a REIT would
not be affected. Also, net equity would not be materially affected.
7
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement provides entities
with relief from having to separately determine the fair value of an embedded derivative that would
otherwise be required to be bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The
Statement allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid financial
instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. The
election may be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and can be made only when a hybrid
financial instrument is initially recognized or when certain events occur that constitute a
remeasurement (i.e., new basis) event for a previously recognized hybrid financial instrument. An
entity must document its election to measure a hybrid financial instrument at fair value, either
concurrently or via a pre-existing policy for automatic election. Once the fair value election has
been made, that hybrid financial instrument may not be designated as a hedging instrument pursuant
to SFAS No. 133. The Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or
subject to a remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
that begins after September 15, 2006. In January 2007, the FASB released Statement 133
Implementation Issue No. B40, Embedded Derivatives: Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized
Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets (B40). B40 provides a narrow scope exception for certain
securitized interests from the tests required under paragraph 13(b) of SFAS No. 133. Those tests
are commonly referred to in practice as the double-double test. B40 represents the culmination of
the FASB staffs consideration of the need for further guidance for securitized interests,
following the issuance in February 2006 of SFAS No. 155. B40 is applicable to securitized interests
issued after June 30, 2007. The Company reviewed all securities that were purchased from January
1, 2007 to March 31, 2007. The adoption of this statement as of January 1, 2007 did not have a
material effect on the Companys financial statements; however, this review is required to be
performed on an ongoing basis. From January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007, the Company purchased
certain hybrid securities which require bifurcation. The Company has elected to carry these
securities at fair value as trading securities, although these securities were not acquired for
resale. See Note 2 for further discussion. Changes in fair value of these securities will be
recognized in other income.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN
48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Companys adoption of this interpretation did not have a
material impact on its financial statements.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This Statement allows entities to make an election to record financial
assets and liabilities, with limited exceptions, at fair value on the balance sheet, with changes
in fair value recorded in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 17, 2007. Early adoption of SFAS No. 159 was permitted as of
the beginning of the fiscal year ending after November 17, 2007. The Company elected not to
early adopt the Statement and is still evaluating the impact of this Statement on its consolidated
financial statements.
8
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 2SECURITIES
Mortgage-backed securities
The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed securities including securities
classified as available-for-sale and hybrid securities classified as trading at March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, which are carried at fair value (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
3,251,597 |
|
|
$ |
2,930,878 |
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
7,549 |
|
Unrealized losses |
|
|
(8,279 |
) |
|
|
(7,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
3,253,369 |
|
|
$ |
2,930,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, mortgage-backed securities had a
weighted-average amortized cost, excluding residual interests, of 99.1% and 99.0% of face amount,
respectively.
The Company purchased securities in the three months ended March 31, 2007 with an amortized
cost basis of $136.4 million at March 31, 2007, which are hybrid securities under the definition of
SFAS No. 155. The Company elected to account for these securities as trading securities for which
changes in fair value will be recognized in income. The change in fair value for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 was $59 thousand.
Actual maturities of mortgage-backed securities are generally shorter than stated contractual
maturities. Actual maturities of the Companys mortgage-backed securities are affected by the
contractual lives of the underlying mortgages, periodic payments of principal and prepayments of
principal.
The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2007,
according to their estimated weighted-average life classifications (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted-Average Life |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Coupon |
|
Less than one year |
|
$ |
297,025 |
|
|
$ |
296,494 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
% |
Greater than one year and less than five years |
|
|
2,905,998 |
|
|
|
2,900,655 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
Greater than five years |
|
|
50,346 |
|
|
|
54,448 |
|
|
|
6.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,253,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,251,597 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2006,
according to their estimated weighted-average life classifications (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted-Average Life |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Coupon |
|
Less than one year |
|
$ |
235,186 |
|
|
$ |
234,932 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
% |
Greater than one year and less than five years |
|
|
2,612,020 |
|
|
|
2,608,627 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
Greater than five years |
|
|
83,732 |
|
|
|
87,319 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,930,938 |
|
|
$ |
2,930,878 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006 in the tables above are based upon data provided through subscription-based financial
information services, assuming constant prepayment rates to the balloon or reset date for each
security. The prepayment model considers current yield, forward yield, steepness of the yield
curve, current mortgage rates, mortgage rates of the outstanding loans, loan age, margin and
volatility.
The actual weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities could be longer or shorter
than the estimates in the table above depending on the actual prepayment rates experienced over the
lives of the applicable securities and are sensitive to changes in both prepayment rates and
interest rates.
The following table shows the Companys mortgage-backed securities fair value and gross
unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
5,986 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
7,196 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,109,960 |
|
|
|
(3,321 |
) |
|
|
180,997 |
|
|
|
(4,912 |
) |
|
|
1,290,957 |
|
|
|
(8,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,115,946 |
|
|
$ |
(3,350 |
) |
|
$ |
182,207 |
|
|
$ |
(4,929 |
) |
|
$ |
1,298,153 |
|
|
$ |
(8,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the Companys mortgage-backed securities fair value and gross
unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
8,850 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,850 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
971,034 |
|
|
|
(3,058 |
) |
|
|
138,210 |
|
|
|
(4,365 |
) |
|
|
1,109,244 |
|
|
|
(7,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
979,884 |
|
|
$ |
(3,124 |
) |
|
$ |
138,210 |
|
|
$ |
(4,365 |
) |
|
$ |
1,118,094 |
|
|
$ |
(7,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007, the Company held $3.3 billion of mortgage-backed securities at fair
value, comprised of $2.3 billion in the Spread portfolio and $1.0 billion in the Residential
Mortgage Credit portfolio, net of unrealized gains of $7.7 million and unrealized losses of $7.4
million. At December 31, 2006, the Company held approximately $2.9 billion of mortgage-backed
securities at fair value, comprised of approximately $2.1 billion in the Spread portfolio and $0.8
billion in the Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio, net of unrealized gains of $7.5 million and
unrealized losses of $7.5 million.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized total impairment losses
on mortgage-backed securities in the Spread portfolio of $1.7 million. The impairment loss
recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2006 was due to the Companys decision to reposition
the Spread portfolio. The Company did not intend to hold certain mortgage-backed securities in the
Spread portfolio that were at unrealized loss positions for a period of time sufficient to allow
for recovery in fair value. The Company determined that the unrealized losses on these
mortgage-backed securities reflected at March 31, 2006 were other-than-temporary impairments as
defined in SFAS No. 115, and therefore the Company recognized impairment losses in its consolidated
statement of operations. No impairment losses were recognized in mortgage-backed securities in the
Spread portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2007
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Spread portfolio contained mortgage-backed
securities with unrealized losses of $0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The Company
intends to hold the mortgage-backed securities in the Spread portfolio for a period of time, to
maturity if necessary, sufficient to allow for the anticipated recovery in fair value of the
securities held. The temporary impairment of these mortgage-backed securities results from the
fair value of the mortgage-backed securities falling below their amortized cost basis and is solely
attributable to changes in interest rates. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, none of the
securities held had been downgraded by a credit rating agency since their purchase and all of the
securities were AAA-rated non-agency-backed or agency-backed mortgage-backed securities. As such,
the Company does not believe any of these securities are other-than-temporarily impaired at March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Certain of the mortgage-backed securities in the Companys Residential Mortgage Credit
portfolio are accounted for in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF 99-20,
Recognition of interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in
Securitized Financial Assets,. Under EITF 99-20, the Company evaluates whether there is
other-than-temporary impairment by discounting projected cash flows using credit, prepayment and
other assumptions compared to prior period projections. If the discounted projected cash flows have
decreased due to a change in the credit, prepayment and other assumptions, then the mortgage-backed
security must be written down to market value if the market value is below the amortized cost
basis. If there have
been no changes to the Companys assumptions and the change in value is solely due to interest
rate changes, the Company does not recognize an impairment of a mortgage-backed security in its
consolidated statement of
11
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
operations. It is difficult to predict the timing or magnitude of these other-than-temporary
impairments and impairment losses could be substantial. During the three months ended March 31,
2007, the Company recorded losses due to other-than-temporary impairments of $4 thousand in the
Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio due to changes in loss assumptions on certain Residential
Mortgage Credit securities.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Residential Mortgage Portfolio contained
mortgage-backed securities with unrealized losses of $7.4 million and $7.1 million in
mortgage-backed securities held in the Companys Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio. The
Company has the intent to hold these mortgage-backed securities for a period of time, to maturity
if necessary, sufficient to allow for the anticipated recovery in fair value. The temporary
impairment of these mortgage-backed securities results from the fair value of the mortgage-backed
securities falling below their amortized cost basis and is solely attributable to changes in
interest rates. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, none of the securities held had been
downgraded by a credit rating agency since their purchase. As such, the Company does not believe
any of these securities are other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company had realized losses of $15.5 million
on the sale of securities in its Residential Mortgage credit portfolio. These securities were
selected for sale due to their rising level of delinquencies in the underlying loan collateral
which was noted in the first quarter of 2007, as well as to reduce the Companys exposure to
certain mortgage-backed asset issuers. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company
had realized gains of $9.6 million and realized losses of $7.6 million on the sale of mortgage
backed securities. Securities were sold during the first quarter of 2006 in order to reposition
the portfolio.
Other securities
The following table summarizes the Companys other securities classified as available-for-sale
at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, which are carried at fair value (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Unrealized losses |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
1,263 |
|
|
$ |
2,188 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3LOANS HELD-FOR-INVESTMENT
The following table summarizes the Companys residential mortgage loans classified as
held-for-investment at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, which are carried at amortized cost,
net of allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Principal |
|
$ |
5,452,591 |
|
|
$ |
5,472,325 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
124,840 |
|
|
|
124,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
5,577,431 |
|
|
|
5,596,737 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,262 |
) |
|
|
(5,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential loans,
net of allowance for
loan losses |
|
$ |
5,569,169 |
|
|
$ |
5,591,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, residential mortgage loans had a weighted-average
amortized cost of 102.3% and 102.3% of face amount, respectively.
The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the Companys
residential mortgage loan portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
5,020 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,543 |
|
Usage of allowance |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
8,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the adequacy of its allowance for loan
losses. Based on this analysis, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $3.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 on the residential mortgage loan portfolio. At March 31,
2006, the Company had not recorded an allowance for loan losses because none of the loans held in
the portfolio were considered impaired. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $51.8 million and
$33.9 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans were 90 days or more past due all of
which were on non-accrual status. Net of delinquent loans which are 90 days or more past due which we believe will be repurchased, our allowance for loan losses represent 21.6% of our loans 90 days or more past due.
NOTE 4BORROWINGS
The Company leverages its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and loans
held-for-investment through the use of various financing arrangements.
The following table presents summarized information with respect to the Companys borrowings
at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
Outstanding(1) |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Collateral(2) |
|
|
Outstanding(1) |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Collateral(2) |
|
Mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
4,270,888 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
$ |
4,270,739 |
|
|
$ |
3,914,932 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
$ |
3,919,354 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,880,678 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
3,046,210 |
|
|
|
2,707,915 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
2,909,895 |
|
Commercial paper facility |
|
|
619,022 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
625,041 |
|
|
|
637,677 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
643,823 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
271,000 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
268,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
403,232 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
420,925 |
|
|
|
752,777 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
794,420 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
none |
|
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,537,608 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
$ |
8,631,305 |
|
|
$ |
8,104,089 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
$ |
8,267,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Outstanding balances for mortgage-backed notes exclude $2.7 million in
unamortized premium at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Outstanding balances of collateralized debt obligations exclude
unamortized discounts of $1.0 million at March 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Collateral for borrowings consists of mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale and loans held-for-investment. |
Mortgage-backed Notes
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had mortgage-backed notes with an
outstanding balance of $4.3 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, and with a weighted-average
borrowing rate of 5.56% and
13
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5.60%, respectively, per annum. The borrowing rates of the mortgage-backed notes reset
monthly based on LIBOR except for $0.2 billion of the notes which, like the underlying loan
collateral, are fixed for a period of three to five years then become variable based on the average
rates of the underlying loans which will adjust based on LIBOR. Unpaid interest on the
mortgage-backed notes was $5.0 million and $4.5 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. The stated maturities of the mortgage-backed notes at March 31, 2007 were between
2035 and 2047. The stated maturities of the mortgage-backed notes at December 31, 2006 were
between 2035 and 2046. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, residential mortgage loans with an
estimated fair value of $4.3 billion and $3.9 billion were pledged as collateral for
mortgage-backed notes issued.
Each series of mortgage-backed notes issued by the Company consists of various classes of
securities which bear interest at varying spreads to the underlying interest rate index. The
maturity of each class of securities is directly affected by the rate of principal repayments on
the associated residential mortgage loan collateral. As a result, the actual maturity of each
series of mortgage-backed notes may be shorter than the stated maturity.
The following table presents the outstanding balance and weighted-average interest rate of
each series of mortgage-backed notes issued by the Company at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding(1) |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Outstanding(1) |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
LUM 2005-1 |
|
$ |
343,966 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
$ |
368,203 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
LUM 2006-1 |
|
|
421,909 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
|
|
|
495,453 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
LUM 2006-2 |
|
|
581,403 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
|
|
668,049 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
LUM 2006-3 |
|
|
548,254 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
588,999 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
|
LUM 2006-4 |
|
|
292,568 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
|
|
324,819 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
LUM 2006-6 |
|
|
664,131 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
|
|
712,959 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
LUM 2006-7 |
|
|
752,061 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
756,450 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
LUM 2007-1 |
|
|
666,596 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,270,888 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
$ |
3,914,932 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Outstanding balances for mortgage-backed notes
exclude $2.7 million in unamortized premium as of March 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006. Collateral for borrowings consists of loans
held-for-investment. |
Repurchase Agreements
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements with third-party financial institutions to
finance the purchase of most of its mortgage-backed securities. The repurchase agreements are
short-term borrowings that bear interest rates that have historically moved in close relationship
to the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. At March 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006, the Company had repurchase agreements with an outstanding balance of $2.9 billion and $2.7
billion, respectively, and with weighted-average interest rates of 5.42% and 5.45%, respectively.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, mortgage-backed securities and loans held-for-investment
pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements had estimated fair values of $3.0 billion and $2.9
billion, respectively.
At March 31, 2007, repurchase agreements had the following remaining maturities (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight 1 day or less |
|
$ |
|
|
Between 2 and 30 days |
|
|
2,377,123 |
|
Between 31 and 90 days |
|
|
60,800 |
|
Between 91 and 1,094 days |
|
|
442,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,880,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
At December 31, 2006, repurchase agreements had the following remaining maturities (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight 1 day or less |
|
$ |
|
|
Between 2 and 30 days |
|
|
2,070,939 |
|
Between 31 and 90 days |
|
|
201,976 |
|
Between 91 and 636 days |
|
|
435,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,707,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper Facility
In August 2006, the Company established a $1.0 billion commercial paper facility, Luminent
Star Funding I, to fund its mortgage-backed security portfolio. Luminent Star Funding I is a
single-seller commercial paper program that provides a financing alternative to repurchase
agreement financing by issuing asset-backed secured liquidity notes that are rated by the rating
agencies Standard & Poors and Moodys. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the outstanding
balance on the commercial paper facility was $619.0 million and $637.7 million, respectively. The
weighted-average interest rate was 5.36% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Collateralized Debt Obligations
In March 2007, the Company issued $400.0 million of collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs,
from Charles Fort CDO I, Ltd., a qualified REIT subsidiary of the Company. The CDOs were in the
form of floating-rate pass-through certificates collateralized by
$289.1 million of the Companys
mortgage-backed securities and $59.1 million of mortgage-backed securities that the Company
retained from prior whole loan securitizations. Of the $400.0 million of CDOs issued, $271.0
million were purchased by third party investors and the Company retained $129.0 million of
certificates including subordinated certificates, which provide credit support to the certificates
issued to third party investors. The interest rates on the floating-rate pass-through certificates
reset quarterly and are indexed to three-month LIBOR. The entity has an uninvested cash balance at
March 31, 2007 of $51.4 million which will be used to purchase additional mortgage-backed
securities as collateral for the CDOs. This securitization transaction was accounted for as a
financing of the mortgage-backed securities. At March 31, 2007, the Companys CDOs had a balance of
$271.0 million, the weighted-average interest rate was 6.44%. See Note 11, Subsequent Events for
further detail of CDOs.
Warehouse Lending Facilities
Mortgage
Loan Financing. The Company has established warehouse lending facilities which are
structured as repurchase agreements. These facilities are the Companys primary source of funding
for acquiring mortgage loans. These warehouse lending facilities are short-term borrowings that
are secured by the loans and bear interest based on LIBOR. In general, the warehouse lending
facilities provide financing for loans for a maximum of 120 days.
The Company acquires residential mortgage loans with the intention of securitizing them and
retaining the securitized mortgage loans in the Companys portfolio to match the income earned on
mortgage assets with the cost of the related liabilities, also referred to as match-funding the
balance sheet. In order to facilitate the securitization or financing of its loans, the Company
generally creates subordinate certificates, providing a specified amount of credit
enhancement, which the Company intends to retain in its investment portfolio. Proceeds from
securitizations are used to pay down the outstanding balance of warehouse lending facilities.
Asset-backed Securities Financing. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
established a $500 million warehouse lending facility with Greenwich Capital Financial Products,
Inc. The facility was used to
15
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
purchase mortgage-backed securities rated below AAA until the Company financed the securities
permanently through CDOs. This warehouse lending facility was a short-term borrowing arrangement
that was secured by asset-backed securities, bearing interest based on LIBOR. The facility was
terminated in March 2007 concurrently with the permanent financing of the asset-backed securities
by the CDOs.
The total borrowing capacity under the Companys warehouse lending facilities was $2.5 billion
and $3.0 billion at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. At March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, $0.4 billion and $0.8 billion, respectively, were outstanding under the
Companys warehouse lending facilities.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Companys warehouse lending facilities included
the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 |
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Borrowing |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Borrowing |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
Counterparty |
|
Capacity |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Mortgage loan financing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwich Capital Financial
Products, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
403.2 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
$ |
1,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
455.2 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
Barclays Bank plc |
|
|
1,000.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000.0 |
|
|
|
290.1 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
Bear Stearns Mortgage Capital Corp. |
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
Asset-backed securities financing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwich Capital Financial
Products, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,500.0 |
|
|
$ |
403.2 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
$ |
3,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
752.8 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants for all
borrowing arrangements and credit facilities.
Junior Subordinated Notes
Junior subordinated notes consist of 30-year notes issued in March and December 2005 to Diana
Statutory Trust I, or DST I, and Diana Statutory Trust II, or DST II, respectively, unconsolidated
affiliates of the Company formed to issue $2.8 million of the trusts common securities to the
Company and to place $90.0 million of preferred securities privately with unrelated third-party
investors. The note balances and related weighted-average interest rates listed by trust were as
follows at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
Junior subordinated notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DST I |
|
$ |
51,550 |
|
|
|
8.16 |
% |
|
$ |
51,550 |
|
|
|
8.16 |
% |
DST II |
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
9.10 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
92,788 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
% |
|
$ |
92,788 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company pays interest to the trusts quarterly. The DST I notes bear interest at a fixed
rate of 8.16% per annum through March 30, 2010 and, thereafter, at a variable rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum through maturity. The DST II notes bear interest at a
variable rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum through maturity. The trusts remit
dividends pro rata to the common and preferred trust securities based on the same terms as the
junior subordinated notes. The DST I notes and trust securities mature in March 2035 and are
redeemable on any interest payment date at the option of the Company in whole, but not in part, on
or after March 30, 2010 at the redemption rate of 100% plus accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to
March 30, 2010, upon the occurrence of a special event relating to certain federal income tax or
investment company events, the Company
16
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
may redeem the DST I notes in whole, but not in part, at the redemption rate of 107.5% plus
accrued and unpaid interest. The DST II notes and trust securities mature in December 2035 are
redeemable on any interest payment date at the option of the Company in whole, but not in part at
the redemption rate of 100% plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Margin Lending Facility
The Company has a margin lending facility with its primary custodian from which the Company
may borrow money in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The terms of the
borrowings, including the rate of interest payable, are agreed to with the custodian for each
amount borrowed. Borrowings are repayable immediately upon demand by the custodian. No borrowings
were outstanding under the margin lending facility at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Capitalized Financing Costs
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had unamortized capitalized financing
costs of $20.7 million and $15.9 million, respectively, related to the Companys borrowings, which
were deferred at the issuance date of the related borrowing and are being amortized using the
effective yield method over the estimated life of the borrowing.
NOTE 5CAPITAL STOCK AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Companys charter authorized the issuance of
100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, 47,958,510 and
47,808,510 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding and no shares of preferred stock
were outstanding.
On November 7, 2005, the Company announced that its board of directors had authorized a share
repurchase program that permits the Company to repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares of its common
stock at prevailing prices through open market transactions subject to the provisions of SEC Rule
10b-18 and in privately negotiated transactions. On February 9, 2006, the Company announced the
initiation of an additional share repurchase program to acquire an incremental 3,000,000 shares.
Through March 31, 2007, the Company had repurchased 2,594,285 shares at a weighted-average price of
$8.00 and was authorized to acquire up to 2,405,715 more common shares.
The Company calculates basic net income per share by dividing net income for the period by the
weighted-average shares of its common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted net income per
share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as stock options and unvested
restricted common stock, but uses the average share price for the period in determining the number
of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
17
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per share for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
Net income (in thousands) |
|
$ |
14,387 |
|
|
$ |
14,387 |
|
|
$ |
17,779 |
|
|
$ |
17,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number
of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
47,316,058 |
|
|
|
47,316,058 |
|
|
|
39,491,786 |
|
|
|
39,491,786 |
|
Additional shares due to
assumed conversion of
dilutive instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
weighted-average number
of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
47,316,058 |
|
|
|
47,427,502 |
|
|
|
39,491,786 |
|
|
|
39,718,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 62003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company adopted a 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 4, 2003, and a 2003 Outside
Advisors Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 4, 2003, pursuant to which up to 1,000,000 shares of
the Companys common stock are authorized to be awarded at the discretion of the compensation
committee of the board of directors. On May 25, 2005, these plans were amended to increase the
total number of shares reserved for issuance from 1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares and to set
the share limits at 1,850,000 shares for the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and 150,000 shares for the
2003 Outside Advisors Stock Incentive Plan. The plans provide for the grant of a variety of
long-term incentive awards to employees and officers of the Company or individual consultants or
advisors who render or have rendered bona fide services as an additional means to attract,
motivate, retain and reward eligible persons. These plans provide for the grant of awards that meet
the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, of non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units and other stock-based awards and
dividend equivalent rights. The maximum term of each grant is determined on the grant date by the
compensation committee and may not exceed 10 years. The exercise price and the vesting requirement
of each grant are determined on the grant date by the compensation committee. The Company uses
historical data to estimate stock option exercises and employee termination in its calculations of
stock-based employee compensation expense and expected terms.
The following table illustrates the common stock available for grant at March 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Outside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Stock |
|
|
Advisors Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Total |
|
Shares reserved for issuance |
|
|
1,850,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
931,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931,166 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for grant |
|
|
918,834 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
1,068,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
At March 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding stock options under the plans with
expiration dates of 2013. The following table summarizes all stock option transactions during the
three months ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
55,000 |
|
$ |
14.82 |
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period |
|
|
55,000 |
|
$ |
14.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes certain information about stock options outstanding at
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted- |
Exercise |
|
Number of |
|
Life |
|
Average |
|
Number of |
|
Life |
|
Average |
Prices |
|
Options |
|
(in years) |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Options |
|
(in years) |
|
Exercise Price |
$13.00-$14.00 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
6.6 |
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
6.6 |
|
$ |
13.00 |
$14.01-$15.00 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$13.00-$15.00 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.82 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options
at March 31, 2007 was zero. All outstanding stock options were fully vested at March 31, 2007.
The following table illustrates the changes in common stock awards during the three months
ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
Issue Price |
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
721,329 |
|
$ |
9.13 |
Issued |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
9.71 |
Repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period |
|
|
871,329 |
|
$ |
9.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of common stock awards is determined on the grant date using the closing
stock price on the NYSE that day.
The following table illustrates the changes in nonvested common stock awards during the three
months ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
Value |
Nonvested, beginning of the period |
|
|
555,923 |
|
$ |
9.20 |
Granted |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
9.71 |
Vested |
|
|
(133,316 |
) |
|
8.68 |
Repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, end of the period |
|
|
572,607 |
|
$ |
9.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based employee compensation expense related to common stock awards for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively. At
March 31, 2007, stock-based
19
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
employee compensation expense of $4.7 million related to nonvested common stock awards is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.
NOTE 7FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the
fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The fair
value of securities is equal to their carrying value presented in the consolidated balance sheet. The
fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, interest receivable, principal
receivable, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, warehouse lending facilities, unsettled
securities purchases and accrued interest expense approximates cost at March 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006 due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value and fair value of
the Companys junior subordinated notes was $92.8 million and $91.5 million, respectively, at March
31, 2007. The carrying value and fair value of the Companys junior subordinated notes was $92.8
million and $91.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2006. The carrying value and fair value
of the Companys loans held-for-investment was $5.6 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively, at
March 31, 2007. The carrying value and fair value of the Companys loans held-for-investment was
$5.6 billion at December 31, 2006. The carrying value and fair value of the Companys
mortgage-backed notes was $4.3 billion at March 31, 2007 and $3.9 billion December 31, 2006. The
carrying value and fair value of the Companys CDOs was $270.0 million at March 31, 2007. No CDOs
were outstanding at December 31, 2006.
NOTE 8ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following is a summary of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Unrealized holding losses on mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(13,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,957 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) on mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale included in net income |
|
|
15,453 |
|
|
|
(993 |
) |
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Net deferred realized and unrealized gains on cash flow hedges |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
Net unrealized losses (gains) on equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Net unrealized losses on debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
4,929 |
|
|
$ |
3,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company seeks to manage its interest rate risk and credit exposure and protect the
Companys liabilities against the effects of major interest rate changes. Such interest rate risk
may arise from: (1) the issuance and forecasted rollover and repricing of short-term liabilities
with fixed rate cash flows or from liabilities with a contractual variable rate based on LIBOR; (2)
the issuance of long-term fixed rate or floating rate debt through securitization activities or
other borrowings or (3) the change in value of loan purchase commitments. The Company also seeks to
manage its credit risk exposure which may arise from the creditworthiness of the holders of the
mortgages underlying its mortgage-related assets. Among other strategies, the Company may use
Eurodollar futures contracts, swaption contracts, interest rate swap contracts, credit default
swaps, nterest rate cap contracts forward sales of To-be-Announced, or TBA, mortgage-backed
securities and other risk-sharing arrangements to manage these risks.
20
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table is a summary of derivative contracts held at March 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Eurodollar futures contracts sold short |
|
$ |
740 |
|
$ |
149 |
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
4,383 |
Interest rate cap contracts |
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
1,531 |
Credit default swaps |
|
|
15,852 |
|
|
6,958 |
Forward sales of TBA mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
Free Standing Derivatives
Free standing derivative contracts are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair
value. Net unrealized gains of $4.7 million and $9.6 million were recognized in other income due to
the change in fair value of these contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The Company realized net gains on free standing derivative contracts of $11.0 million and zero
in other income during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Realized net
gains include realized gains and losses on derivative contracts and other income and expense on
free standing derivatives.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategies
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company entered into derivative contracts that were accounted
for under hedge accounting as prescribed by SFAS No. 133. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company
discontinued the use of hedge accounting. Under hedge accounting, prior to the end of the specified
hedge time period, the effective portion of all contract gains and losses, whether realized or
unrealized, was recorded in other comprehensive income or loss. Hedge effectiveness gains included
in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2005 will be amortized during the
specified hedge time period. Under hedge accounting, realized gains and losses were reclassified
into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense during the specified hedge time period. Realized
gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2005 will be
amortized during the specified hedge time period. All changes in value of derivative instruments
that had previously been accounted for under hedge accounting are recognized in other income or
expense.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, interest expense decreased by $0.1
million and $1.5 million, respectively, due to the amortization of net realized gains on Eurodollar
futures contracts.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, interest expense decreased by $0.4
million and $1.6 million due to the amortization of effectiveness gains on Eurodollar futures
contracts and interest rate swap contracts.
Purchase Commitment Derivatives
The Company may enter into commitments to purchase mortgage loans, or purchase commitments,
from the Companys network of originators. Each purchase commitment is evaluated in accordance
with SFAS No. 133 to determine whether the purchase commitment meets the definition of a derivative
instrument. At March 31, 2007, outstanding purchase commitments with a net unrealized loss of $0.5
million were recorded on the Companys consolidated statement of operations. There were no
outstanding purchase commitments at December 31, 2006.
21
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, net losses of $0.6 million and $1.0
million related to purchase commitment derivatives were recorded in other expense on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations.
NOTE 10INCOME TAXES
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. As such, the Company routinely
distributes substantially all of the income generated from operations to its stockholders. As long
as the Company
retains its REIT status, it generally will not be subject to U.S. federal or state corporate
taxes on its income to the extent that it distributes its REIT taxable net income to its
stockholders.
The Company has a taxable REIT subsidiary that receives management fees in exchange for
various advisory services provided in conjunction with the Companys investment strategies. In the
first quarter of 2007, this taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to corporate income taxes on its
taxable income at a combined federal and state effective tax rate. The same taxable REIT
subsidiary was subject to the Pennsylvania Capital Stock and Franchise Tax as well as Philadelphia
Gross Receipts Tax and Philadelphia Net Income Tax. The Company also has a taxable REIT subsidiary
that purchases mortgage loans and creates securitization entities as a means of securing long-term
collateralized financing.
Distributions declared per share were $0.30 and $0.05 for the quarters ended March 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. All distributions were classified as ordinary income to stockholders for
income tax purposes.
NOTE 11SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In May 2007, a securitization entity sponsored by the Company issued $657.0 million of
mortgage-backed securities through Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 which are collateralized by
$662.1 of mortgage loans. The Company retained $3.9 million of the securities and sold $653.1
million to third parties. The securitization has been accounted for as financings under SFAS No.
140.
Subsequent to March 31, 2007, the Company sold $25.0 million of CDOs which were originally
retained at the closing of the CDO issuance. Additionally, $37.3 million of the uninvested cash
balance at the closing of the transaction has been invested in mortgage-backed securities which
will collateralize the CDOs leaving a remaining uninvested cash balance of $11.6 million as of
May 9, 2007.
On April 11, 2007, the Company announced the adoption of a stock repurchase plan in accordance
with the guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Rule 10b5-1
allows a public company to adopt a written, prearranged stock repurchase plan when it does not have
material, non-public information in its possession. The adoption of this stock repurchase plan will
allow the Company to repurchase shares during periods when it might otherwise be prevented from
doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods. The
Company repurchased a total of 2.2 million shares under repurchase programs through May 9, 2007.
On May 7, 2007, Luminents board of directors approved an authorization to repurchase an
additional five million shares of common stock. As of May 9, 2007 the Company is authorized
to acquire up to 5.2 million shares of common stock.
22
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of
this Form 10-Q. This discussion may contain certain forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are those that are not historical in nature.
Cautionary Note regarding Forward-looking Statements. As a result of many factors, such as those
set forth under Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, Item 1A of our 2006 Form 10-K,
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report or incorporated by reference herein, our actual results may
differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.
Overview
Executive Summary
Key metrics of our company as of March 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Financial performance: |
|
|
|
|
Return on equity |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Net interest spread |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
Quarterly dividend declared |
|
$0.30 Per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed assets: |
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of total securitized assets rated AAA |
|
81.5 |
% |
Weighted
average credit rating of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
AA |
|
Percentage of total assets that are
non-investment grade |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Asset/liability duration gap |
|
1 month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average loan-to-value (1) |
|
|
72.8 |
% |
Weighted average FICO score |
|
|
714 |
|
Number of loans with FICO scores below 620 |
|
|
11 |
|
Percentage of loans with FICO scores above 700 |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
Percentage of no documentation loans |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Percentage owner occupied properties |
|
|
86.4 |
% |
Percentage single family properties |
|
|
83.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including the effect of mortgage insurance |
Our primary mission is to provide a secure stream of income for our stockholders based on
the steady and reliable payments of residential mortgages. We are a real estate investment trust,
or REIT, which, together with our subsidiaries, invests in two core mortgage investment strategies.
Under our Residential Mortgage Credit strategy, we invest in mortgage loans purchased from selected
high-quality providers within certain established criteria as well as subordinated mortgage-backed
securities and other asset-backed securities that have credit ratings below AAA. Under our Spread
strategy, we invest primarily in U.S. agency and other highly-rated single-family, adjustable-rate
and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities.
Our Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio represents the majority of our overall asset
portfolio with investments that are less sensitive to interest rates, and therefore more
predictable and sustainable. Our credit strategy seeks to
23
structure, acquire and fund mortgage loans that will provide long-term reliable income to our
stockholders. We seek to accomplish this goal primarily through the purchase of mortgage loans that
we design through selected high quality providers with whom we have long and well-established
relationships. As a secondary strategy, we invest in subordinated mortgage-backed securities or
other debt securities that have credit ratings below AAA. We do this opportunistically as we
discover value and credit arbitrage opportunities in the market. We then securitize those loans and
mortgage-backed securities and seek to retain the most valuable tranches of the securitizations.
These securitizations reduce our sensitivity to interest rates and help match the income we earn on
our mortgage assets and mortgage-backed securities with the cost of our related liabilities. The
debt that we incur in these securitizations is non-recourse to us; however, our mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed assets are pledged as collateral for the securities we issue. Approximately 96% of
the securities in our Spread portfolio consist of residential mortgage-backed securities with
interest rates that reset within one month or less and the balance reset within one year.
Using these investment strategies, we seek to acquire mortgage-related assets, finance these
purchases in the capital markets and use leverage in order to provide an attractive return on
stockholders equity. We have acquired and may seek to acquire additional assets that we expect
will produce competitive returns, taking into consideration the amount and nature of the
anticipated returns from the investments, our ability to pledge the investments for secured,
collateralized borrowings and the costs associated with financing, managing, securitizing and
reserving for these investments.
Recently, the subprime mortgage banking environment has been experiencing considerable strain
from rising delinquencies and liquidity pressures and some subprime mortgage lenders have failed.
The increased scrutiny of the subprime lending market is one of the factors that have impacted
general market conditions as well as perceptions of our business.
24
Investors should distinguish our business model from that of a subprime originator. We do not
acquire subprime mortgage loans. We are not a direct originator of mortgage loans and therefore we
are not subject to early payment default claims. We acquire mortgage loans exclusively from
well-capitalized originators, who meet our standards for financial and operational quality. We
maintain ample liquidity to manage our business and have largely match-funded our balance sheet.
During the last year, we have substantially reduced our reliance on short term repurchase agreement
funding. As such, we experienced no liquidity strains during the recent market turmoil.
We invest in high-quality residential mortgage loans, AAA-rated and agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities and subordinated mortgage-backed securities which have significant
structural credit enhancement. At March 31, 2007, 61.5% of our assets consisted of first lien,
prime quality residential mortgage loans, with a weighted-average FICO score of 714 and a
weighted-average loan-to-value ratio, net of mortgage insurance, of 72.8%. Our AAA-rated and
agency-backed mortgage-backed securities portfolio represented 25.3% of our assets at March 31,
2007. This portfolio has virtually no credit risk. Our subordinated mortgage-backed securities
portfolio represented 10.7% of our assets at March 31, 2007 and had a weighted-average credit
rating of A-. Structured credit enhancements in this portfolio provide us with significant
protection against credit loss. Our diversified business model provides us flexibility to allocate
capital to our various investment strategies as market conditions change.
We neither directly originate mortgage loans nor directly service mortgage loans. We purchase
pools of mortgage loans through our diverse network of well-capitalized origination partners. All
of the loans we purchase are underwritten to agreed-upon specifications in conjunction with our
selected high-quality originators. In addition, we obtain representations and warranties from each
originator to the effect that each loan is underwritten in accordance with the guidelines. An
originator who breaches its representations and warranties may be obligated to repurchase loans
from us.
Within the loan market, we have focused on prime quality, first lien Alt-A adjustable-rate
mortgage loans. In the Alt-A market, borrowers choose the convenience of less than full
documentation in exchange for a slightly higher mortgage rate. We diligently review the credit risk
associated with each mortgage loan pool we purchase. We employ a comprehensive underwriting
process, driven by our experienced personnel. We require mortgage insurance on all loans with
loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% and, in certain pools, we purchase supplemental mortgage
insurance down to the 75% loan-to-value ratio level.
Our mortgage loan portfolio has virtually no exposure to the subprime sector, which is
currently generating high delinquencies. At March 31, 2007, mortgage loans with FICO scores less
than 620, a measure that is generally considered to be an indicator of subprime, represented only
11 loans or 0.1% of our total mortgage loan portfolio. In addition, at March 31, 2007, none of our
mortgage loans had loan-to-value ratios, net of mortgage insurance, greater than 80%. No
documentation loans as a percentage of our total loan portfolio was just 2.3% at March 31, 2007.
We believe that our collateral characteristics, as well as our comprehensive underwriting process,
provide us with strong protection against credit loss.
The number of seriously delinquent loans in our loan portfolio was just 87 basis points
(0.87%) of total loans at March 31, 2007. This percentage is well within our expectations for
performance and compares very favorably with industry statistics for prime ARM loans, for which the
Mortgage Bankers Association reports a serious delinquency rate of 145 basis points (1.45%) at
December 31, 2006. Our credit performance bears no resemblance to subprime performance, for which
the Mortgage Bankers Association reports a serious delinquency rate of 916 basis points (9.16%) at
December 31, 2006. We evaluate our mortgage loan portfolio for impairment on a quarterly basis, and
increase or decrease our allowance for loan losses based on that analysis. Our allowance for loan
losses was $8.3 million at March 31, 2007. When foreclosures occur, we believe we will realize
modest severities, due to the low weighted-average loan-to-value ratios in our portfolio and to
current indications from our ongoing surveillance of property valuations on delinquent loans.
We finance our portfolios of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities through the use of
repurchase agreements, securitization transactions structured as secured financings, a commercial
paper facility, warehouse lending facilities and junior subordinated notes. We manage the levels of
the financing liabilities funding our portfolios based on recourse leverage. At March 31, 2007, our
recourse leverage ratio, defined as recourse financing
25
liabilities as a ratio of stockholders equity plus long-term debt, was 7.1x. We generally
seek to maintain an overall borrowing recourse leverage of less than 10 times the amount of our
equity and long-term debt. We actively manage our capital efficiency through the types of
borrowings, including the non-recourse mortgage-backed notes and collateralized debt obligations
issued to finance our securitized mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, in order to manage
our liquidity and interest rate related risks.
We manage liquidity to ensure that we have the continuing ability to maintain cash flows that
are adequate to fund operations and meet commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis. At March
31, 2007, we had unencumbered assets of over $200 million, consisting of unpledged mortgage-backed
securities, equity securities, and cash and cash equivalents. We believe that our liquidity level
is in excess of that necessary to satisfy our operating requirements and we expect to continue to
use diverse funding sources to maintain our financial flexibility.
Our business is affected by the following economic and industry factors that may have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations:
|
|
interest rate trends and changes in the yield curve; |
|
|
the availability of a sufficient supply of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities
for purchase that meet our standards; |
|
|
rates of prepayment on our mortgage loans and the mortgages underlying our mortgage-backed securities; |
|
|
continued creditworthiness of the holders of mortgages underlying our mortgage-related assets; |
|
|
highly competitive markets for investment opportunities; and |
|
|
other market developments. |
In addition, several factors relating to our business may also impact our financial condition
and results of operations. These factors include:
|
|
credit risk as defined by prepayments, delinquencies and defaults on our mortgage loans and
the mortgage loans underlying our mortgage-backed securities; |
|
|
overall leverage of our portfolio; |
|
|
access to funding and adequate borrowing capacity; |
|
|
increases in our borrowing costs; |
|
|
the ability to use derivatives to mitigate our interest rate, credit risk and prepayment risks; |
|
|
the market value of our investments; and |
|
|
compliance with REIT requirements and the requirements we must meet to qualify for an
exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
Refer to Risk Factors in Item 1A of our 2006 Form 10-K for additional discussion regarding
these and other risk factors that affect our business. Refer to Credit Risk and Interest Rate
Risk in Item 7A of this Form 10-Q and our 2006 Form 10-K for additional credit risk and interest
rate risk discussion.
26
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. These accounting principles require us
to make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Our most critical accounting
policies involve decisions and assessments that could significantly affect our reported assets and
liabilities, as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions
and assessments upon which our consolidated financial statements are based were reasonable at the
time made based upon information available to us at that time. See Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of our 2006 Form 10-K for a further discussion of our
significant accounting policies. Management has identified our most critical accounting policies
to be the following:
Classifications of Investment Securities
Our investment securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and are carried on
our consolidated balance sheet at their fair value. The classification of securities as
available-for-sale results in changes in fair value being recorded as adjustments to accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss, which is a component of stockholders equity, rather than
through results of operations. If our available-for-sale securities were classified as trading
securities, our results of operations could experience substantially greater volatility from
period-to-period. We hold certain hybrid securities which we have elected in accordance with the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 to account for as trading
securities. These securities were not acquired for resale. Changes in the fair value of trading
securities are required to be reported in the results of operations and therefore we may experience
volatility in our results of operations from period to period.
Valuations of Mortgage-backed Securities
Our Spread portfolio of mortgage-backed securities has fair values based on estimates provided
by independent pricing services and dealers in mortgage-backed securities. Because the price
estimates may vary between sources, we make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate
price to use. Different judgments and assumptions could result in different presentations of value.
We estimate the fair value of our Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio of mortgage-backed
securities using internally generated cash flow analysis, available market information and other
appropriate valuation methodologies. We believe the estimates we use reflect the market values we
may be able to receive should we choose to sell the mortgage-backed securities. Our estimates
involve matters of uncertainty, judgment in interpreting relevant market data and are inherently
subjective in nature. Many factors are necessary to estimate market values, including, but not
limited to, interest rates, prepayment rates, amount and timing of credit losses, supply and
demand, liquidity, cash flows and other market factors. We apply these factors to our portfolio as
appropriate in order to determine market values.
When the fair value of an available-for-sale security is less than amortized cost, we consider
whether there is an other-than-temporary impairment in the value of the security. The determination
of other-than-temporary impairment is a subjective process, requiring the use of judgments and
assumptions. If we determine an other-than-temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the
security is written down to the then-current fair value, and the unrealized loss is recorded as a
reduction of current earnings as if the loss had been realized in the period of impairment.
We consider several factors when evaluating securities for an other-than-temporary impairment,
including the length of time and extent to which the market value has been less than the amortized
cost, whether the security has been downgraded by a rating agency and our continued intent and
ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in market value. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recognized total impairment
losses on mortgage-backed securities in our Spread portfolio of $1.7 million. The
27
impairment loss recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2006 was due to our decision to
reposition our Spread portfolio. We did not intend to hold certain mortgage-backed securities in
our Spread portfolio that were at unrealized loss positions for a period of time sufficient to
allow for recovery in fair value. We determined that the unrealized losses on these mortgage-backed
securities reflected at March 31, 2006 were other-than-temporary impairments as defined in SFAS No.
115, and therefore we recognized impairment losses in our consolidated statement of operations. We
also recognized impairment losses of $4 thousand during the three months ended March 31, 2007 on
mortgage-backed securities in our Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio due to other-than-temporary
impairments. At March 31, 2007, we had gross unrealized losses on our mortgage-backed securities
classified as available-for-sale of $8.3 million which, if not recovered, may result in the
recognition of future losses.
We evaluate the determination of other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. If
future evaluations conclude that impairment is other-than-temporary, we may need to realize a loss
that would have an impact on income.
Loans Held-for-Investment
We purchase pools of residential mortgage loans through our network of origination partners.
Mortgage loans are designated as held-for-investment as we have the intent and ability to hold them
for the foreseeable future, and until maturity or payoff. Mortgage loans that are considered to be
held-for-investment are carried at their unpaid principal balances, including unamortized premium
or discount and allowance for loan losses.
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level that we believe is adequate based on an
evaluation of known and inherent risks related to our loan investments. When determining the
adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, we consider historical and industry loss experience,
economic conditions and trends, the estimated fair values of our loans, credit quality trends and
other factors that we determine are relevant. In our review of national and local economic trends
and conditions we consider, among other factors, national unemployment data, changes in housing
appreciation and whether specific geographic areas where we have significant loan concentrations
are experiencing adverse economic conditions and events such as natural disasters that may affect
the local economy or property values.
To estimate the allowance for loan losses, we first identify impaired loans. Loans purchased
with relatively smaller balances and substantially similar characteristics are evaluated
collectively for impairment. Seriously delinquent loans with balances greater than $1.0 million are
evaluated individually. We consider loans impaired when, based on current information, it is
probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of
the loan agreement, including interest payments, or if it is unlikely that the seller will
repurchase the loan in situations were we have the contractual right request a repurchase. Impaired
loans are carried at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or the fair value of the
collateral less costs to dispose of the property.
Our allowance for loan losses is established using mortgage industry experience and rating
agency projections for loans with characteristics that are broadly similar to our portfolio. This
analysis begins with actual 60 day or more delinquencies in our portfolio, and projects ultimate
default experience (i.e., the rate at which loans will go to liquidation) on those loans based on
mortgage industry loan delinquency migration statistics. For all loans showing indications of
probable default, we apply a severity factor for each loan, again using loss severity projections
from a model developed by a major rating agency for loans broadly similar to the loans in our
portfolio. We then use our judgment to ensure all relevant factors that could affect our loss
levels are considered and would adjust the allowance for loan losses if we believe that an
adjustment is warranted. We include the effect of our contractual right to put loans back to
sellers in the event of early pay default or fraud. We have established procedures to perform
contract enforcement and have been successful in this effort. Over time, as our loan portfolio
seasons and generates actual loss experience, we will incorporate our actual loss history for
forecasting losses and establishing credit reserves.
28
We performed an allowance for loan losses analysis at March 31, 2007 and recorded a $3.5
million provision for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Interest Income Recognition
We accrue interest income on our mortgage-backed securities based on the coupon rate and the
outstanding principal amount of the underlying mortgages. Premiums and discounts are amortized or
accreted as adjustments to interest income over the lives of the securities using the effective
yield method adjusted for the effects of estimated prepayments based on SFAS, No. 91, Accounting
for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct
Costs of Leases. If our estimate of prepayments is incorrect, we may be required to make an
adjustment to the amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts that would have an impact on
our future results of operations. We account for certain of the mortgage-backed securities in our
Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF,
99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests
in Securitized Financial Assets. We recognize interest income using the effective yield method. We
use the prospective method for adjusting the level yield used to recognize interest income when
estimates of future cash flows over the remaining life of the security either increase or decrease.
We project cash flows based on managements assumptions for prepayment rates and credit losses
using data provided by a third party service provider. Actual economic conditions may produce cash
flows that could differ significantly from projected cash flows, and differences could result in an
increase or decrease in the yield used to record interest income or could result in impairment
losses.
We accrue interest income on our mortgage loans and credit it to income based on the carrying
amount and contractual terms or estimated life of the assets using the effective yield method in
accordance with SFAS No. 91. We discontinue the accrual of interest on impaired loans when, in
managements opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. Also, we
place loans 90 days or more past due on non-accrual status. When we discontinue an interest
accrual, we reverse all associated unpaid accrued interest income against current period operating
results. We recognize interest income subsequently only to the extent cash payments are received.
Securitizations
We create securitization entities as a means of securing long-term, non-recourse
collateralized financing for our residential mortgage loan portfolio and mortgage-backed securities
portfolio and matching the income earned on residential mortgage loans with the cost of related
liabilities, otherwise referred to as match funding our balance sheet. Residential mortgage loans
or mortgage-backed securities are transferred to a separate bankruptcy-remote legal entity from
which private-label multi-class mortgage-backed notes or collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs
are issued. On a consolidated basis, we account for securitizations as secured financings as
defined by SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities, and, therefore, no gain or loss is recorded in connection with the
securitizations. Each securitization entity is evaluated in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board, or FASB, Interpretation, or FIN, 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, and we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the securitization
entities. As such, the securitization entities are consolidated into our consolidated balance sheet
subsequent to securitization. Residential mortgage loans or mortgage-backed notes transferred to
securitization entities collateralize the debt issued, and, as a result, those investments are not
available to us, our creditors or our stockholders. All discussions relating to securitizations are
on a consolidated basis and do not necessarily reflect the separate legal ownership of the loans or
mortgage-backed securities by the related bankruptcy-remote legal entity.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
We may enter into a variety of derivative contracts, including futures contracts, swaption
contracts, interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap contracts, credit default swaps and
risk-sharing arrangements as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk on forecasted interest
expense as well as to mitigate our credit risk on credit sensitive mortgage-backed securities.
Effective January 1, 2006, we discontinued the use of hedge accounting, in accordance with SFAS No.
133. All changes in value of derivative contracts that had previously been accounted for under
hedge
29
accounting are now recorded in other income or expense and could potentially result in
increased volatility in our results of operations.
We may enter into commitments to purchase mortgage loans, or purchase commitments, from our
network of originators. We evaluate each purchase commitment in accordance with SFAS No. 133 to
determine whether the purchase commitment meets the definition of a derivative instrument. Purchase
commitments that meet the definition of a derivative instrument are recorded at their estimated
fair value on our consolidated balance sheet and any change in fair value of the purchase
commitment is recognized in other income or expense. Upon settlement of the loan purchase, the
purchase commitment derivative is derecognized and is included in the cost basis of the loans
purchased.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has placed an item on its SFAS No. 140 project agenda relating to the treatment of
transactions where mortgage-backed securities purchased from a particular counterparty are financed
via a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty. Currently, we record such assets and the
related financing gross on our consolidated balance sheet, and the corresponding interest income
and interest expense gross on our consolidated statement of operations. Any change in fair value of
the security is reported through other comprehensive income or current period income, depending on
its classification under SFAS No. 115.
However, in a transaction where the mortgage-backed securities are acquired from and financed
under a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, the acquisition may not qualify as a sale
from the sellers perspective under the provisions of SFAS No. 140. In such cases, the seller may
be required to continue to consolidate the assets sold to us, based on the sellers continuing
involvement with such investments. Depending on the ultimate outcome of the FASB deliberations, we
may be precluded from presenting the assets gross on its balance sheet and may instead be required
to treat our net investment in such assets as a derivative.
This potential change in accounting treatment does not affect the economics of the
transactions but does affect how the transactions would be reported in our consolidated financial
statements. Our cash flows, liquidity and ability to pay a dividend would be unchanged, and we
expect that REIT taxable income and our qualification as a REIT would not be affected. Also, net
equity would not be materially affected.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155. This Statement provides entities with relief
from having to separately determine the fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise
be required to be bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The Statement
allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid financial instrument at
fair value in its entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. The election may be
made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and can be made only when a hybrid financial instrument
is initially recognized or when certain events occur that constitute a remeasurement (i.e., new
basis) event for a previously recognized hybrid financial instrument. An entity must document its
election to measure a hybrid financial instrument at fair value, either concurrently or via a
pre-existing policy for automatic election. Once the fair value election has been made, that hybrid
financial instrument may not be designated as a hedging instrument pursuant to SFAS No. 133. The
Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement
event occurring after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after September
15, 2006. In January 2007, the FASB released Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. B40, Embedded
Derivatives: Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets
(B40). B40 provides a narrow scope exception for certain securitized interests from the tests
required under paragraph 13(b) of SFAS No. 133. Those tests are commonly referred to in practice as
the double-double test. B40 represents the culmination of the FASB staffs consideration of the
need for further guidance for securitized interests, following the issuance in February 2006 of
SFAS No. 155. B40 is applicable to securitized interests issued after June 30, 2007. We reviewed
all securities we purchased on or after January 1, 2007. The adoption of this statement as of
January 1, 2007 did not have a material effect on our financial statements however, this review
is required to be performed on an ongoing basis. Since the adoption of the standard we
purchased certain hybrid securities which require bifurcation. We have elected to carry these
securities at fair value as trading securities although these securities were not acquired for
resale. See Note 2 to our financial statement
30
footnotes. We will recognize changes in fair value of these securities in other income.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation
also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in
interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. Our adoption of this interpretation did not have a material impact on our
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This Statement allows entities to make an election to record financial
assets and liabilities, with limited exceptions, at fair value on the balance sheet, with changes
in fair value recorded in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 17, 2007. Early adoption of SFAS No. 159 was permitted as of the beginning of the fiscal
year ending after November 17, 2007. We elected not to early adopt this statement and we are still
evaluating the impact of this Statement on our financial statements.
Results of Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, our net income was $14.4 million, or $0.30
per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted), and $17.8 million, or $0.45 per
weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted), respectively.
The table below details the components of our net interest spread for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted-average yield on average earning
assets, net of premium amortization or
discount accretion |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
5.46 |
% |
Weighted-average cost of financing liabilities |
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We define weighted-average yield on average earning assets, net of premium amortization
or discount accretion, as total interest income earned divided by the weighted-average amortized
cost of our mortgage assets during the period. Weighted-average earning assets during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $8.4 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively.
Total interest income from mortgage assets was $145.6 million and $61.6 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The year-over-year increase in interest income
is primarily due to the growth of our mortgage loan portfolio and credit sensitive bond portfolio
as well as higher yields on our mortgage assets that have resulted from the restructuring and sale
of assets in our Spread portfolio and the redeployment of our capital into the higher-yielding
assets of our Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio during the first quarter of 2006.
31
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
of Average |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
of Average |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Interest expense on mortgage-backed notes |
|
$ |
61,044 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
$ |
13,774 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
% |
Interest expense on repurchase agreement liabilities |
|
|
36,414 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
28,015 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
Interest expense on commercial paper facility |
|
|
9,150 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
6,868 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes |
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Interest expense on CDOs |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net realized gains on futures and
interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
Net interest expense on interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
Other |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
115,204 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
% |
|
$ |
46,072 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We define our weighted-average cost of total financing liabilities as total interest
expense divided by the weighted-average amount of our financing liabilities during the period,
including mortgage-backed notes, CDOs, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, warehouse lending
facilities and junior subordinated notes. Interest expense consists of interest payments on our
debt and consolidated mortgage-backed notes issued, less the amortization of mortgage-backed
securities issuance premiums. Mortgage-backed securities issuance premiums are created when
interest-only securities and other mortgage-backed securities are issued at prices greater than
their principal value. Weighted-average financing liabilities during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006 were $8.4 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $115.2 million and
$46.1 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to the increase in
the balance of the loans held-for-investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios, as well as
an increase in the overall level of interest rates between March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, which
directly affects our costs of liabilities.
The components of other income and expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
are summarized in the following table (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Realized gains on derivative instruments, net |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Net interest income on interest rate swaps |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivative related expenses |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on derivatives, net |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Sales of mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Losses |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, realized losses on the
sale of mortgage-backed securities were $15.5 million which were
mainly offset by realized and unrealized gains on derivative instruments of $14.9 million. During the three months ended
March 31, 2006
32
realized
gains were $9.6 million
and realized losses were $7.5 million recognized on the sale of mortgage-backed securities. Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 includes other-than-temporary impairment losses of $4 thousand and $1.7 million, respectively.
The other-than-temporary impairment loss for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was due to
assumption changes on certain Residential Mortgage Credit Securities. The other-than-temporary
impairment loss recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was related to certain assets
that we did not intend to hold until their maturity or their unrealized losses recovered.
Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $15.2 million and
$6.3 million, respectively. The year-over-year increase in operating expenses is primarily due to
increased operating expenses that are required to manage our Residential Mortgage Credit strategy.
Servicing expense, which is a required expense for all of our mortgage loans held-for-investment,
was $6.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $1.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006, and reflects the growth in our mortgage loans held-for-investment
portfolio. The provision for loan losses was $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007, compared to zero for the three months ended March 31, 2006, and reflects the growth and
seasoning of our mortgage loans held-for-investment. Salaries and benefits were $3.1 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2006, and reflects the addition of 20 new employees.
REIT taxable net income
We calculate REIT taxable net income according to the requirements of the Code, rather than
GAAP. We believe that REIT taxable net income is an important measure of our financial performance
because REIT taxable net income, and not GAAP net income, is the basis upon which we make our cash
distributions that enable us to maintain our REIT status.
We estimate our REIT taxable net income at certain times during the course of each fiscal year
based upon a variety of information from third parties, although we do not receive some of this
information before we complete our estimates. As a result, our REIT taxable net income estimates
during the course of each fiscal year are subject to adjustments to reflect not only the subsequent
receipt of new information as to future events but also the subsequent receipt of information as to
past events. Our REIT taxable net income is also subject to changes in the Code, or in the
interpretation of the Code, with respect to our business model. REIT taxable net income for each
fiscal year does not become final until we file our tax return for that fiscal year.
The following table reconciles our GAAP net income to our estimated REIT taxable net income
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
GAAP net income |
|
$ |
14,387 |
|
|
$ |
17,779 |
|
Adjustments to GAAP net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and interest expense, net |
|
|
(15,304 |
) |
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing expense |
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
Sales of mortgage-backed securities, net |
|
|
15,453 |
|
|
|
(2,063 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
|
(7,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments to GAAP net income |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(9,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable net income |
|
$ |
14,279 |
|
|
$ |
8,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable net income per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Average shares outstanding on dividend record
date during the quarter |
|
|
48,056,594 |
|
|
|
39,681,445 |
|
33
Estimated undistributed REIT taxable net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006 was as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Undistributed REIT taxable net income, beginning of period |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,154 |
|
REIT taxable net income earned during period |
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
|
8,327 |
|
Distributions declared during period, net of dividend
equivalent rights on restricted stock |
|
|
(14,216 |
) |
|
|
(1,954 |
) |
Other adjustments |
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed REIT taxable net income, end of period |
|
$ |
6,663 |
|
|
$ |
9,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions per share declared during period |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of current year REIT taxable net income distributed |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that these presentations of our REIT taxable net income are useful to
investors because they are directly related to the distributions we are required to make in order
to retain our REIT status. REIT taxable net income entails certain limitations, and by itself is an
incomplete measure of our financial performance over any period. As a result, our REIT taxable net
income should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our GAAP-based net income
as a measure of our financial performance.
Financial Condition
Mortgage-backed securities
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we held $3.3 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively,
of mortgage-backed securities. Our investment strategy includes purchases of credit-sensitive
residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities that have credit ratings
below AAA and purchases of U.S. agency and other AAA-rated single-family adjustable-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities.
34
The following table presents our mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006 classified as either Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio assets or Spread portfolio assets
and further classified by type of issuer and/or by rating categories (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
securities |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
securities |
|
Residential Mortgage Credit Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA/Aa rating |
|
$ |
192,449 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
129,096 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
A/A rating |
|
|
347,163 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
238,623 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
BBB/Baa rating |
|
|
285,580 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
273,359 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment-grade MBS |
|
|
825,192 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
641,078 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating |
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment-grade MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB/Ba rating |
|
|
129,260 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
145,741 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Not rated |
|
|
10,731 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
11,196 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment-grade MBS |
|
|
139,991 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
156,937 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating (1) |
|
|
BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio |
|
|
965,183 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
798,015 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating (1) |
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
Spread Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency MBS |
|
|
93,530 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
106,648 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
AAA/Aaa rating |
|
|
2,194,656 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
2,026,275 |
|
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Spread portfolio |
|
|
2,288,186 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
2,132,923 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
Weighted-average credit rating |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
3,253,369 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,930,938 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating |
|
|
AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted-average credit rating excludes non-rated mortgage-backed
securities of $10.7 million and $11.2 million at March 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006, respectively. |
Loans held-for-investment
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our residential mortgage loans held-for-investment
totaled $5.6 billion including unamortized premium of $124.8 million and $124.4 million,
respectively. Our residential mortgage loans at March 31, 2007 were comprised of $5.0 billion of
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans that collateralize mortgage-backed notes
and $0.4 billion of adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans pending
securitization. Our residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2006 were comprised of $4.7 billion
of hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans that collateralized mortgage-backed notes and $0.8 billion
of adjustable-rate mortgage loans pending securitization. We intend to securitize subsequent
acquisitions of loans, maintain those loans as held-for-investment on our consolidated balance
sheet and account for the securitizations as financings under SFAS No. 140.
35
At March 31, 2007, our residential loans held-for-investment consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
> 90 days as a |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Loans as a |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Months to |
|
|
Funds |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Description |
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Reset |
|
|
Hedging (1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
> 90 days |
|
|
Total Principal |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
Floating rate
mortgage |
|
|
8.19 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3,886,428 |
|
|
$ |
33,604 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Hybrid mortgage |
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1,566,163 |
|
|
|
18,240 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7.72 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
5,452,591 |
|
|
$ |
51,844 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We attempt to mitigate our interest rate risk by economically hedging
the cost of liabilities related to our hybrid residential mortgage
loans. Amounts reflect the effect of these hedges on the months to
reset of our residential mortgage loans. In addition, the financing
for $0.2 billion of our hybrid residential mortgage loans is, like the
underlying collateral, fixed for a period of three to five years and
then becomes variable based upon the average rates of the underlying
loans which will adjust based on LIBOR. The weighted-average period to
reset of the debt we use to acquire residential mortgage loans was
match funded approximately five months at March 31, 2007. |
At December 31, 2006, our residential loans held-for-investment consisted of the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
> 90 days as a |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Loans as a |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Months to |
|
|
Funds |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Description |
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Reset |
|
|
Hedging (1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
> 90 days |
|
|
Total Principal |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
Floating rate
mortgage |
|
|
8.02 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,089,015 |
|
|
$ |
20,830 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
Hybrid mortgage |
|
|
6.57 |
% |
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,383,310 |
|
|
|
13,053 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
5,472,325 |
|
|
$ |
33,883 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We attempt to mitigate our interest rate risk by hedging the cost of
liabilities related to our hybrid residential mortgage loans. Amounts
reflect the effect of these hedges on the months to reset of our
residential mortgage loans. In addition, the financing for $0.3
billion of our hybrid residential mortgage loans is, like the
underlying collateral, fixed for a period of three to five years then
becomes variable based upon the average rates of the underlying loans
which will adjust based on LIBOR. The weighted-average period to reset
of the debt we use to acquire residential mortgage loans was match
funded approximately six months at December 31, 2006. |
36
The following table summarizes key metrics of our residential mortgage loans
held-for-investment at March 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
5,452,591 |
|
Number of loans |
|
|
14,208 |
|
Average loan balance |
|
$ |
384 |
|
Weighted-average coupon rate |
|
|
7.72 |
% |
Weighted-average lifetime cap |
|
|
10.73 |
% |
Weighted-average original term, in months |
|
|
375 |
|
Weighted-average remaining term, in months |
|
|
364 |
|
Weighted-average loan-to-value ratio (LTV)(1) |
|
|
72.8 |
% |
Weighted-average FICO score |
|
|
714 |
|
Number of loans with FICO scores below 620 |
|
|
11 |
|
Percentage of loans with FICO scores above 700 |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 80% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 90% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 80% net of
mortgage insurance |
|
|
0 |
% |
Percentage of no documentation loans |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Percentage of loans originated for refinancing purposes |
|
|
57.6 |
% |
Top five geographic concentrations (% exposure): |
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Virginia |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Nevada |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Occupancy status: |
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
|
86.4 |
% |
Investor |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Property type: |
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
|
83.5 |
% |
Condominium |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Other residential |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Collateral type: |
|
|
|
|
Alt A first lien |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including the effect of mortgage insurance |
37
The following table summarizes key metrics of our residential mortgage loans
held-for-investment at December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
5,472,325 |
|
Number of loans |
|
|
13,942 |
|
Average loan balance |
|
$ |
393 |
|
Weighted-average coupon rate |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
Weighted-average lifetime cap |
|
|
10.64 |
% |
Weighted-average original term, in months |
|
|
375 |
|
Weighted-average remaining term, in months |
|
|
366 |
|
Weighted-average loan-to-value ratio (LTV)(1) |
|
|
72.6 |
% |
Weighted-average FICO score |
|
|
713 |
|
Number of loans with FICO scores below 620 |
|
|
11 |
|
Percentage of loans with FICO scores above 700 |
|
|
58.5 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 80% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 90% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 80%
net of mortgage insurance |
|
|
0 |
% |
Percentage of no documentation loans |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Percentage of loans originated for refinancing purposes |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
Top five geographic concentrations (% exposure): |
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Virginia |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Nevada |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Occupancy status: |
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
Investor |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Property type: |
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
Condominium |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Other residential |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Collateral type: |
|
|
|
|
Alt A first lien |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including the effect of mortgage insurance |
38
The following table presents our residential mortgage loan portfolio grouped by the
percentages in each of three different documentation types, further stratified by loan-to-value
ratios, net of mortgage insurance, and FICO scores at March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FICO Scores |
|
|
<620 |
|
620-659 |
|
660-699 |
|
700-739 |
|
740+ |
|
Total |
Full Documentation:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Full Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Documentation:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reduced Documentation |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Documentation:(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total No Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Full documentation includes verification of the borrowers income, employment,
assets and liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Reduced documentation, sometimes referred to as Alt-A, includes mortgages that
comply with most, but not all, of the Federal National Mortgage Association and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation criteria for a conforming mortgage. Alt-A
mortgages are generally high quality, with less than full documentation verified. |
|
(3) |
|
No documentation excludes verification of borrowers income, employment or assets. |
39
The following table presents our residential mortgage loan portfolio grouped by the
percentages in each of three different documentation types, further stratified by loan-to-value
ratios, net of mortgage insurance, and FICO scores at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FICO Scores |
|
|
<620 |
|
620-659 |
|
660-699 |
|
700-739 |
|
740+ |
|
Total |
Full Documentation:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Full Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Documentation:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reduced Documentation |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Documentation:(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total No Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
60.01 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
70.01 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Full documentation includes verification of the borrowers income, employment,
assets and liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Reduced documentation, sometimes referred to as Alt-A, includes mortgages that
comply with most, but not all, of the Federal National Mortgage Association and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation criteria for a conforming mortgage. Alt-A
mortgages are generally high quality, with less than full documentation verified. |
|
(3) |
|
No documentation excludes verification of borrowers income, employment or assets. |
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, none of our loans had LTV ratios, net of mortgage
insurance, greater than 80%. No documentation loans as a percentage of our total loan portfolio
were 2.3% and 2.5%, at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
At March 31, 2007, 123 of the 14,208 loans, or 87 basis points (0.87%) of our $5.6 billion
residential mortgage loan portfolio were 90 days or more delinquent with an aggregate balance of
$51.8 million, and were on non-accrual status. At December 31, 2006, 75 of the 13,942 loans, or
0.54%, in our $5.5 billion residential mortgage loan portfolio were 90 days or more delinquent with
an aggregate balance of $33.9 million, and were on non-accrual status.
We performed an allowance for loan losses analysis at March 31, 2007 and recorded a $3.5
million provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Our allowance for loan losses was established
using industry experience and rating
40
agency projections for loans with characteristics that are broadly similar to our portfolio.
This analysis begins with actual 60 day or more delinquencies in our portfolio, and projects
ultimate default experience (i.e., the rate at which loans will go to liquidation) on those loans
based on industry loan delinquency migration statistics. For all loans showing indications of
probable default, we apply a severity factor for each loan, again using loss severity projections
from a model developed by a major rating agency for loans broadly similar to the loans in our
portfolio. We include the effect of our contractual right to put loans back to sellers in the event
of early pay default or fraud. We have established procedures to perform contract enforcement and
have been successful in this effort. Loans that we believe we will successfully put-back are
deducted from our loss projections. Management then uses judgment to ensure all relevant factors
that could affect our loss levels are considered and adjusts the allowance for loan losses if we
believe that an adjustment is warranted. This analysis was the basis for our $7.9 million general
allocated allowance at March 31, 2007. Seriously delinquent loans with balances greater than $1.0
million are evaluated individually. Such loans are considered impaired when, based on current
information, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement, including interest payments. Impaired loans are carried at
the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or the fair value of the collateral less costs to
dispose of the property. We recorded a specific reserve for loans meeting these criteria of $0.4
million at March 31, 2007. We did not record an unallocated allowance for loan losses at March 31,
2007 as we did not identify any factors in the portfolio that warranted such an allowance. Usage of the allowance occurs when a loan proceeds through the foreclosure process and becomes real estate owned, or REO. When a loan becomes REO we estimate the specific
loss on that loan, if any, based on the expected net proceeds from the final disposition of the property and reduce the allowance for loan losses by that amount. Additionally, the allowance is reduced for any loans that are disposed of at a loss prior to their becoming
REO. Usage of the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 was $301 thousand. Usage of
the allowance for loan losses does not equate to a realized loss for REIT taxable income purposes.
At March 31, 2007, 13 of the residential loans we owned with an outstanding balance of $4.9
million were considered to be real estate owned, or REO, as a result of foreclosure on delinquent
loans. The loans have been reclassified from loans to other assets on our balance sheet at the
lower of cost or estimated fair value.
We performed an allowance for loan losses analysis at March 31, 2006, and we made a
determination that no allowance for loan losses was required for our residential mortgage loan
portfolio at March 31, 2006.
Securitizations
Mortgage-Backed Notes
We create securitization entities as a means of securing long-term collateralized financing
for our residential mortgage loan portfolio, matching the income earned on residential mortgage
loans with the cost of related liabilities, otherwise referred to as match-funding our balance
sheet. We may use derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, to achieve this result.
Residential mortgage loans are transferred to a separate bankruptcy-remote legal entity from which
private-label multi-class mortgage-backed securities are issued. These mortgage-backed securities
are carried at their unpaid principal balances net of any unamortized discount or premium. On a
consolidated basis, securitizations are accounted for as secured financings as defined by SFAS No.
140 and, therefore, no gain or loss is recorded in connection with the securitizations. The
treatment of securitization transactions can be different for taxation purposes than under GAAP. We
evaluate each securitization entity in accordance with FIN 46(R), and we have determined that we
are the primary beneficiary of the securitization entities. As such, we consolidate the
securitization entities into our consolidated balance sheet subsequent to securitization.
Residential mortgage loans transferred to securitization entities collateralize the mortgage-backed
securities issued, and, as a result, those investments are not available to us, our creditors or
our stockholders. All discussions relating to securitizations are on a consolidated basis and do
not necessarily reflect the separate legal ownership of the loans by the related bankruptcy-remote
legal entity.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we issued approximately $0.7 billion
and $1.4 billion of mortgage-backed notes, respectively. We retained $15.5 million and $0.1
billion, respectively, of the
41
resulting securities for our securitized residential loan portfolio and placed $0.7 billion
and $1.3 billion, respectively, with third-party investors. All of the mortgage-backed notes issued
were priced with interest indexed to one-month LIBOR.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had mortgage-backed notes with an outstanding
balance of $4.3 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, and with a weighted-average borrowing rate
of 5.56% and 5.60% per annum, respectively. The borrowing rates of the mortgage-backed notes at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 reset monthly based on LIBOR except for $0.2 billion and $0.3
billion, respectively, of notes which, like the underlying loan collateral, are fixed for a period
of 3 to 5 years and then become variable based on the average rates of the underlying loans which
will adjust based on LIBOR. Unpaid interest on the mortgage-backed notes was $5.0 million and $4.5
million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Net unamortized premium on the
mortgage-backed notes was $2.7 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The stated
maturities of the mortgage-backed notes at March 31, 2007 were from 2035 to 2047 and, at December
31, 2006, were from 2035 to 2046. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, residential mortgage
loans with an estimated fair value of $4.3 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, were pledged as collateral for mortgage-backed
notes issued.
Each series of mortgage-backed notes that we have issued has consisted of various classes of
securities that bear interest at varying spreads to the underlying interest rate index. The
maturity of each class of securities is directly affected by the rate of principal repayments on
the associated residential mortgage loan collateral. As a result, the actual maturity of each
series of mortgage-backed notes may be shorter than its stated maturity.
42
The following table highlights the securitizations we have completed through March 31, 2007,
as of each transaction execution date (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
LUM |
|
Total |
|
|
2005-1 |
|
2006-1 |
|
2006-2 |
|
2006-3 |
|
2006-4 |
|
2006-5 |
|
2006-6 |
|
2006-7 |
|
2007-1 |
|
Portfolio |
Transaction execution date |
|
|
11/2/05 |
|
|
|
1/26/06 |
|
|
|
2/23/06 |
|
|
|
4/28/06 |
|
|
|
5/28/06 |
|
|
|
6/29/06 |
|
|
|
9/28/06 |
|
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
1/25/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
520,568 |
|
|
$ |
576,122 |
|
|
$ |
801,474 |
|
|
$ |
682,535 |
|
|
$ |
497,220 |
|
|
$ |
508,789 |
|
|
$ |
772,732 |
|
|
$ |
799,655 |
|
|
$ |
706,841 |
|
|
$ |
5,865,936 |
|
Mortgage-backed notes issued
to third parties |
|
|
500,267 |
|
|
|
536,657 |
|
|
|
746,973 |
|
|
|
654,270 |
|
|
|
376,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753,415 |
|
|
|
756,450 |
|
|
|
691,383 |
|
|
|
5,015,563 |
|
|
Debt retained |
|
|
20,301 |
|
|
|
39,465 |
|
|
|
54,501 |
|
|
|
28,265 |
|
|
|
121,072 |
|
|
|
508,789 |
|
|
|
19,317 |
|
|
|
43,205 |
|
|
|
15,458 |
|
|
|
850,373 |
|
|
Retained investment grade %(1) |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
97.2 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Retained non-investment grade
%(1) |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Cost of debt on AAA-rated
mortgage-backed notes spread
to LIBOR(2) |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retained tranches as a percentage of total mortgage-backed notes issued. |
|
(2) |
|
LUM 2006-3 cost of debt excludes $0.3 billion of AAA mortgage-backed
notes which, like the underlying loan collateral, are fixed for three
to five years then become variable based upon the average rates of the
underlying loans which will adjust based on LIBOR. |
43
The following table presents the rating categories of the mortgage-backed securities
issued in our securitizations completed through March 31, 2007, as of each execution date (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
LUM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2005-1 |
|
|
2006-1 |
|
|
2006-2 |
|
|
2006-3 |
|
|
2006-4 |
|
|
2006-5 |
|
|
2006-6 |
|
|
2006-7 |
|
|
2007-1 |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Transaction
execution date |
|
|
11/2/05 |
|
|
|
1/26/06 |
|
|
|
2/23/06 |
|
|
|
4/28/06 |
|
|
|
5/28/06 |
|
|
|
6/29/06 |
|
|
|
9/28/06 |
|
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
1/25/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
notes issued to
third-party
investors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa rating |
|
$ |
482,307 |
|
|
$ |
517,069 |
|
|
$ |
717,320 |
|
|
$ |
597,700 |
|
|
$ |
376,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
712,846 |
|
|
$ |
725,289 |
|
|
$ |
668,844 |
|
|
$ |
4,797,523 |
|
AA/Aa rating |
|
|
17,960 |
|
|
|
19,588 |
|
|
|
29,653 |
|
|
|
56,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,364 |
|
|
|
20,597 |
|
|
|
19,926 |
|
|
|
193,658 |
|
A/A rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,205 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
21,741 |
|
BBB/Baa rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
mortgage-backed
notes issued to
third-party
investors |
|
$ |
500,267 |
|
|
$ |
536,657 |
|
|
$ |
746,973 |
|
|
$ |
654,270 |
|
|
$ |
376,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
753,415 |
|
|
$ |
756,450 |
|
|
$ |
691,383 |
|
|
$ |
5,015,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total
collateral |
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
|
93.2 |
% |
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
75.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.5 |
% |
|
|
94.6 |
% |
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
85.5 |
% |
Debt retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa rating |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
66,378 |
|
|
$ |
457,910 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,153 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
551,441 |
|
AA/Aa rating |
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,397 |
|
|
|
21,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
7,935 |
|
|
|
57,048 |
|
A/A rating |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
13,251 |
|
|
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
9,852 |
|
|
|
12,430 |
|
|
|
9,667 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
74,534 |
|
BBB/Bbb rating |
|
|
5,206 |
|
|
|
8,930 |
|
|
|
11,221 |
|
|
|
9,649 |
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
59,160 |
|
BB/Ba rating |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
6,215 |
|
|
|
6,614 |
|
|
|
6,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,584 |
|
B/B rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
8,015 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
3,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
Not rated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
4,476 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
36,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-
backed notes
retained |
|
|
17,439 |
|
|
|
39,465 |
|
|
|
54,501 |
|
|
|
24,206 |
|
|
|
121,072 |
|
|
|
508,789 |
|
|
|
19,317 |
|
|
|
43,205 |
|
|
|
15,458 |
|
|
|
843,452 |
|
Overcollateralization |
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt retained |
|
$ |
20,301 |
|
|
$ |
39,465 |
|
|
$ |
54,501 |
|
|
$ |
28,265 |
|
|
$ |
121,072 |
|
|
$ |
508,789 |
|
|
$ |
19,317 |
|
|
$ |
43,205 |
|
|
$ |
15,458 |
|
|
$ |
850,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total
collateral |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
44
Collateralized Debt Obligations
In March 2007, we issued $400.0 million of CDOs from Charles Fort CDO I, Ltd., our qualified
REIT subsidiary. The CDOs were in the form of floating-rate pass-through certificates
collateralized by $289.1 million of our mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale and $59.1
million of mortgage-backed securities which we retained from prior whole loan securitizations. Of
the $400.0 million of CDOs issued, $271.0 million were purchased by third party investors and we
retained $129.0 million of certificates including the subordinated certificates, which provide
credit support to the certificates issued to third party investors. Subsequent to March 31, 2007,
we sold $25.0 million of CDOs which were originally retained at the closing of the CDO issuance.
The interest rates on the floating-rate pass-through certificates reset quarterly and are indexed
to three-month LIBOR. The entity has an uninvested cash balance at March 31, 2007 of $51.4 million
which was used to purchase additional mortgage-backed securities as collateral for the CDOs.
Subsequently to the closing of the transaction an additional $37.3 million was invested in mortgage
backed assets leaving $14.1 million uninvested at April 30, 2007 (to be updated prior to filing.)
As of March 31, 2007, our CDOs had an outstanding balance of $271.0 million, and a weighted average
interest rate of 6.44%.
Asset Repricing Characteristics
The following table summarizes the repricing characteristics of our mortgage assets by
portfolio, and further classified by asset type and frequency of repricing of their coupon rate
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Mix |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Mix |
|
Residential Mortgage Credit Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM residential loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset 1 month or less |
|
$ |
3,886,428 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,089,015 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
Reset >1 month but < 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
Reset >12 months but < 60 months |
|
|
1,216,485 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
1,180,727 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Reset > 60 months |
|
|
349,678 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
202,299 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
124,840 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
124,412 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,262 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(5,020 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
5,569,169 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
|
5,591,717 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset 1 month or less |
|
|
868,895 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
796,539 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Reset >1 month but < 12 months |
|
|
10,895 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset >12 months but < 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset > 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
879,790 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
796,539 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
85,393 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
Spread Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset 1 month or less |
|
|
2,192,657 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
2,024,275 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Reset >1 month but < 12 months |
|
|
95,529 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
108,648 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Reset >12 months but < 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset > 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
2,288,186 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
2,132,923 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage assets |
|
$ |
8,822,538 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,522,655 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the weighted-average period to reset of our
total mortgage assets was 11 months and 10 months, respectively. We attempt to mitigate our
interest rate risk by hedging the cost of liabilities related to our hybrid residential mortgage
loans. Our net asset/liability duration gap was approximately one month at March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006.
45
Total mortgage assets had a weighted-average coupon of 7.03% at March 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006.
Our mortgage assets are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps.
Periodic interest rate caps limit the amount by which the interest rate on a mortgage can increase
during any given period. Lifetime interest rate caps limit the amount by which an interest rate can
increase through the term of a mortgage. The weighted-average lifetime cap of our mortgage-backed
securities was 11.40% and 12.32% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The
weighted-average lifetime cap of our loans held-for-investment was 10.73% and 10.64% at March 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
The periodic adjustments to the interest rates of our mortgage assets are based on changes in
an objective index. Substantially all of our mortgage assets adjust their interest rates based on:
(1) the U.S. Treasury index, or Treasury, which is a monthly or weekly average yield of benchmark
U.S. Treasury securities published by the Federal Reserve Board; (2) LIBOR; (3) Moving Treasury
Average, or MTA or (4) Cost of Funds Index, or COFI.
The percentages of the mortgage assets in our investment portfolio at March 31, 2007 that were
indexed to interest rates are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
Treasury |
|
MTA |
|
COFI |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
The percentages of the mortgages assets in our investment portfolio at December 31, 2006
that were indexed to interest rates is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
Treasury |
|
MTA |
|
COFI |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
nm |
The constant payment rate on our total mortgage assets, an annual rate of principal paydowns
for our mortgage assets relative to the outstanding principal balance of our total mortgage assets,
was 24% and 15% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. The
constant payment rate attempts to predict the percentage of principal that will paydown over the
next 12 months based on historical principal paydowns. The principal payment rate cannot be
considered an indication of future principal repayment rates because actual changes in market
interest rates will have a direct impact on the principal prepayments on the mortgage assets we
hold in our portfolio.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2007, the primary source of funds for our loan acquisition and securitization
portfolio was $4.3 billion of non-recourse mortgage-backed notes, with a weighted-average borrowing
rate of 5.56%. In addition, we had a $500.0 million warehouse lending facility with Bear Stearns
Mortgage Capital Corporation that was established in October 2005, a $1.0 billion warehouse lending
facility with Greenwich Financial Products, Inc. that was established in January 2006 and a $1.0
billion warehouse lending facility with Barclays Bank plc that was established in July 2006. All
three warehouse lending facilities are structured as repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2007, the total outstanding balance on our warehouse lending facilities was $0.4
billion and $0.8 billion, respectively.
The residential mortgage loans we acquire are initially financed with our warehouse lending
facilities, with the intention of ultimately securitizing the loans and financing them permanently
through the issuance of non-
46
recourse mortgage-backed notes. Proceeds from our securitizations are used to pay down the
outstanding balance of our warehouse lending facilities. We match the income that we earn on our
mortgage loans, plus the benefit of any hedging activities, with the cost of the liabilities
related to our mortgage loans, a process known as match-funding our balance sheet. In order to
facilitate the securitization and permanent financing of our mortgage loans, we generally create
subordinated certificates, which also provides a specified amount of credit enhancement, that we
intend to retain on our balance sheet.
Certain mortgage loans that we purchase permit negative amortization. A negative amortization
provision in a mortgage allows the borrower to defer payment of a portion or all of the monthly
interest accrued on the mortgage and to add the deferred interest amount to the mortgages
principal balance. As a result, during periods of negative amortization, the principal balances of
negatively amortizing mortgages will increase and their weighted-average lives will extend. Our
mortgage loans generally can experience negative amortization to a maximum amount of 110-125% of
the original mortgage loan balance. As a result, given the relatively low average loan-to-value
ratio of 72.8%, net of mortgage insurance, on our portfolio at March 31, 2007, we believe that our
portfolio would still have a significant homeowners equity cushion even if all
negatively-amortizing loans reached their maximum permitted amount of negative amortization.
We have structured all of our negatively amortizing mortgage loans into various
securitizations and have retained ownership in these securitizations in part or whole in the form
of mortgage-backed securities. These securitization structures effectively prevent the disbursement
of deferred interest which arises from negative amortization. Deferred interest increases the bond
balances of the securitization structure and is not disbursed from the structure.
Securitization structures allocate the principal payments and prepayments on mortgage loans,
including loans with negative amortization features. To date, prepayments on our mortgage loans
with negative amortization have been sufficient to offset negative amortization such that all our
securitization structures have made all their required payments to bondholders.
A reconciliation of the cash flows on our residential mortgage loans that have negatively
amortizing loans and the mortgage-backed notes backed by those residential mortgage loans during
the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments received on residential mortgage loans |
|
$ |
404,531 |
|
Principal distributed to mortgage-backed note holders(1) |
|
|
(364,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal receipts used for interest payments on mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
39,791 |
|
Interest cash receipts on residential mortgage loans for interest and other
fee income, net of servicing and other reimbursements |
|
|
47,825 |
|
Interest payments to mortgage-backed note holders(1) |
|
|
(87,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on mortgage-backed notes in excess of interest cash receipts |
|
|
(39,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount includes principal and interest distributed on bonds we retained. |
Based on our projections of estimated prepayments on negatively amortizing loans, we believe
that our securitizations will continue to support required payments to the holders of the
mortgage-backed notes we issue.
The primary source of funds used to finance our mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2007
consisted of repurchase agreements totaling $2.9 billion with a weighted-average current borrowing
rate of 5.42%. We expect to continue to borrow funds for our mortgage-backed securities through
repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2007, we had established 21 borrowing arrangements with various
investment banking firms and other lenders, 14 of which were in use on March 31, 2007. Increases in
short-term interest rates could negatively impact the valuation of our mortgage-backed securities
that we are financing with repurchase agreements, which could limit our future borrowing ability or
cause our repurchase agreement counterparties to initiate margin calls. Amounts due upon maturity
of our repurchase agreements will be funded primarily through the rollover/reissuance of repurchase
agreements and monthly principal and interest payments received on our mortgage-backed securities.
During the
47
three months ended March 31, 2007, we experienced margin calls from certain repurchase
agreement counterparties on some of our bonds and were not able to refinance some of our bonds that
rolled over during the period at the same funding levels that we had previously. Although these
changes reduce our leverage ratios and funds available to reinvest, we had sufficient liquidity to
satisfy these margin calls. As of March 31, 2007, we had over $200 million of unencumbered assets
on our balance sheet.
We also established a $500 million warehouse lending facility with Greenwich Capital Financial
Products, Inc. in September 2006 to provide short-term financing of our mortgage-backed assets
until these assets were permanently financed with CDOs. This facility was terminated in March 2007
concurrently with the permanent financing of the assets with CDOs.
In August 2006, we established a $1.0 billion commercial paper facility to finance our
purchases of agency and AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities through a subsidiary we called
Luminent Star Funding I. Luminent Star Funding I is a single-seller commercial paper program that
provides a financing alternative to repurchase agreement financing by issuing asset-backed secured
liquidity notes that are rated by the rating agencies Standard & Poors and Moodys. At March 31,
2007, the outstanding balance on the commercial paper facility was $0.6 billion at a
weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.36%.
In September 2006, we entered into a $435 million term repurchase agreement with Barclays
Capital. We are using the facility to acquire AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities. The facility
has a term of up to two years and is expected to decrease our liquidity risk by reducing our
reliance on short-term repurchase agreement financing.
The following table describes the private-label, non-recourse multi-class mortgage-backed
notes that were issued to provide permanent funding of our residential mortgage loans in the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, as of the transaction execution date (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUM |
|
|
2007-1 |
Transaction execution date |
|
|
1/25/07 |
|
Loans, unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
706,841 |
|
Mortgage-backed notes issued to third parties |
|
|
691,383 |
|
Debt retained |
|
$ |
15,458 |
|
At March 31, 2007, we had mortgage-backed notes totaling $4.3 billion with a
weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.56%. The borrowing rates of the mortgage-backed notes reset
monthly based on one-month LIBOR with the exception of $0.2 billion of non-retained mortgage-backed
notes that, like the underlying loan collateral, are fixed for a period of 3 to 5 and years then
become variable based on the average rates of the underlying loans which will adjust based on
LIBOR.
We have a margin lending facility with our primary custodian from which we may borrow money in
connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The terms of our borrowings, including the rate
of interest payable, are agreed to with the custodian for each amount borrowed. Borrowings are
repayable upon demand by the custodian. No borrowings were outstanding under the margin lending
facility at March 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
In 2005, we completed two trust preferred security offerings in the aggregate amount of $90.0
million, providing long-term financing for our balance sheet. We received proceeds, net of debt
issuance costs, from the preferred securities offerings in the amount of $87.2 million.
We manage the levels of the financing liabilities funding our portfolios based on recourse
leverage. At March 31, 2007, our recourse leverage ratio, defined as recourse financing liabilities
as a ratio of stockholders equity plus long-term debt, was 7.1x. We generally seek to maintain an
overall borrowing recourse leverage of less than 10 times the amount of our equity and long-term
debt. We actively manage our capital efficiency through our liability structure, including the
non-recourse mortgage-backed notes and CDOs issued to finance our securitized
48
loans-held-for investment and mortgage-backed securities, in order to manage our liquidity and
interest rate related risks.
For liquidity, we also rely on cash flows from operations, primarily monthly principal and
interest payments to be received on our mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans, as well as
any primary securities offerings authorized by our board of directors.
On May 9, 2007, we paid a cash distribution of $0.30 per share to our stockholders of record
on April 11, 2007. This distribution is a taxable dividend and is not considered a return of
capital. We did not distribute an estimated $4.4 million of our REIT taxable net income for the year ended
December 31, 2006. We intend to declare a spillback distribution during 2007 after we finalize our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We believe that equity capital, combined with our cash flows from operations, securitizations
and the utilization of borrowings, will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated liquidity
requirements. If our cash resources are at any time insufficient to satisfy our liquidity
requirements, we may be required to liquidate mortgage-related assets or sell debt or additional
equity securities. If required, the sale of mortgage-related assets at prices lower than the
carrying value of such assets could result in losses and reduced income.
We have a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective by the SEC on
January 21, 2005. Under this shelf registration statement, we may offer and sell any combination of
common stock, preferred stock, warrants to purchase common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities in one or more offerings up to total proceeds of $500.0 million. Each time we offer to
sell securities, a supplement to the prospectus will be provided containing specific information
about the terms of that offering. On February 7, 2005, we entered into a Controlled Equity Offering
Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor Fitzgerald, through which we may sell
common stock or preferred stock from time to time through Cantor Fitzgerald acting as agent and/or
principal in privately negotiated and/or at-the-market transactions under this shelf registration
statement. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold approximately 1.7 million shares of our
common stock pursuant to this agreement resulting in net proceeds of approximately $17.2 million.
In addition, on October 13, 2006, we issued 6.9 million shares of our common stock at $10.25 per
share as a result of completing a public offering pursuant to this shelf registration statement. At
December 31, 2006, total proceeds of up to $380.5 million remain available to us to offer and sell
under this shelf registration statement.
We also have a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with respect to our Direct Stock
Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan, or the Plan, which was declared effective by the SEC on
June 28, 2005. The Plan offers stockholders, or persons who agree to become stockholders, the
option to purchase shares of our common stock and/or to automatically reinvest all or a portion of
their quarterly dividends in our shares. Through March 31, 2007, we issued no new
shares of common stock through the Plan.
In November 2005, we announced a stock repurchase program permitting us to acquire up to
2,000,000 shares of our common stock. In February 2006, we announced an additional stock repurchase
program to acquire an incremental 3,000,000 shares. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we
repurchased a total of 1,919,235 shares at a weighted-average price of $8.22 per share. From the
inception of our repurchase program through December 31, 2006, we have repurchased a total of
2,594,285 shares at a weighted-average price of $8.00 per share. We will, at our discretion,
purchase shares at prevailing prices through open market transactions subject to the provisions of
SEC Rule 10b-18 and in privately negotiated transactions. No shares were repurchased during the
quarter ended March 31, 2007. On April 11, 2007, we announced the adoption of a stock repurchase
plan in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Rule 10b5-1 allows a public company to adopt a written, prearranged stock repurchase plan
when it does not have material, non-public information in its possession. The adoption of this
stock repurchase plan will allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be
prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout
periods. On May 7, 2007, our board of directors approved an authorization to repurchase an
additional 5,000,000 shares of common stock. We repurchased a total
of 2,194,900 shares under repurchase programs through May 9, 2007.
In July 2006, we announced that our $2.5 billion securitization shelf registration statement
filed on Form S-3
49
was declared effective by the SEC. Under this shelf registration statement, we may
administer our own securitizations by offering securities collateralized by loans we acquire. Each
time we offer to sell securities, a supplement to the prospectus will be provided containing
specific information about the terms of that offering. Both LUM 2006-6 and LUM 2006-7
securitizations were completed under this shelf registration statement. At December 31, 2006, total
proceeds of up to $0.9 billion remained available to us to offer and sell under this shelf
registration statement. In January 2007, our $0.7 billion securitization LUM 2007-1 was completed
under this shelf registration statement. Amendment No. 1 to this shelf registration statement for an
additional $2.5 billion was declared effective by the SEC on February 28, 2007.
We may increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of equity and debt
securities, possibly including classes of preferred stock, common stock, medium-term notes,
collateralized mortgage obligations and senior or subordinated notes. Such financings will depend
on market conditions for raising capital and for the investment of any net proceeds from such
capital raises. All debt securities, other borrowings and classes of preferred stock will be senior
to our common stock if we were to liquidate.
Inflation
Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, interest
rates and other factors influence our performance far more so than inflation does. Changes in
interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, and our distributions are determined by our board of directors
primarily based on our REIT taxable net income as calculated pursuant to the Code; in each case,
our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost and/or fair market
value without considering inflation.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations at March 31, 2007. The table excludes
unamortized discounts and premiums as well as accrued interest payable, and derivative contracts because those contracts do not have fixed and determinable payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 5 |
|
|
More than |
|
(in millions) |
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1 3 years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Mortgage-backed notes (1) |
|
$ |
4,270.9 |
|
|
$ |
992.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,975.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,205.8 |
|
|
$ |
97.3 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,880.7 |
|
|
|
2,572.9 |
|
|
|
307.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lending
facilities |
|
|
403.2 |
|
|
|
403.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
621.8 |
|
|
|
621.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDOs (1) |
|
|
271.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
128.3 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
Facilities leases |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,541.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,591.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,331.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,334.4 |
|
|
$ |
283.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The mortgage-backed notes and CDOs have stated maturities through 2047; however, the expected maturity is subject to
change based on the prepayments and loan losses of the underlying mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities. In addition,
we may exercise a redemption option and thereby effect termination and early retirement of the debt. The payments represented
reflect our assumptions for prepayment and credit losses at March 31, 2007 and assume we will exercise our redemption option. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In 2005, we completed two trust preferred securities offerings in the aggregate amount of
$90.0 million. We received proceeds, net of debt issuance costs, from the preferred securities
offerings in the amount of $87.2 million. We believe that none of the commitments of these
unconsolidated special purpose entities expose us to any greater loss than is already reflected on
our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial
50
statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further discussion about the preferred securities
of subsidiary trusts and junior subordinated notes.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The primary components of our market risk are credit risk and interest rate risk as described
below. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we do seek to assume risk that can be
quantified from historical experience, to manage that risk, to earn sufficient compensation to
justify taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake or
to which we are exposed.
Credit Risk
We are subject to credit risk in connection with our investments in residential mortgage loans
and credit sensitive mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities rated below AAA. The credit risk related to these
investments pertains to the ability and willingness of the borrowers
to pay, which is assessed before credit is granted or renewed and periodically reviewed throughout the loan or security term.
We believe that loan credit quality is primarily determined by the borrowers credit profiles and
loan characteristics.
We use a comprehensive credit review process. Our analysis of loans includes borrower
profiles, as well as valuation and appraisal data. Our resources include sophisticated industry and
rating agency software. We also outsource underwriting services to review higher risk loans, either
due to borrower credit profiles or collateral valuation issues. In addition to statistical sampling
techniques, we create adverse credit and valuation samples, which we individually review. We reject
loans that fail to conform to our standards. We accept only those loans that meet our careful
underwriting criteria.
Once we own a loan, our surveillance process includes ongoing analysis through our proprietary
data warehouse and servicer files. We are proactive in our analysis of payment behavior and in loss
mitigation through our servicing relationships.
We are also subject to credit risk in connection with our investments in mortgage-backed
securities in our Spread portfolio, which is mitigated by holding securities that are either
guaranteed by government or government-sponsored agencies or have credit ratings of AAA.
Concentration Risk
Inadequate diversification of our loan portfolio, such as geographic regions, may result in
losses. As part of our underwriting process, we diversify the geographic concentration risk
exposure in our portfolios.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our investments in residential
mortgage loans, adjustable-rate, hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities
and our related debt obligations, which include mortgage-backed notes, warehouse lending
facilities, derivative contracts and repurchase agreements.
Effect on Net Interest Income
We finance our mortgage loans held-for-investment through a combination of warehouse lending
facilities initially, and non-recourse mortgage-backed notes following the securitization of our
loans. Our mortgage loan assets consist of a combination of adjustable-rate mortgage loans and
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans. The interest rates on our warehouse lending facilities and
non-recourse mortgage-backed notes generally reset on a monthly basis. In general, we use
derivative contracts to match-fund the cost of our related borrowings with the income that we
expect to earn from our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans that currently have fixed coupon
rates. If our hedging activities are effective, over a variety of interest rate scenarios the
change in income from our
51
mortgage loans held-for-investment, plus the benefit or cost of our related hedging
activities, will generally offset the change in the cost of our related borrowings such that the
net interest spread from our mortgage loans will remain substantially unchanged.
We finance our adjustable-rate, hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed
securities with short-term borrowings under repurchase agreements. During periods of rising
interest rates, the borrowing costs associated with hybrid-adjustable rate (during the fixed-rate
component of such securities) and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities tend to increase while the
income earned on such hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities may remain
substantially unchanged. This effect results in a narrowing of the net interest spread between the
related assets and borrowings with respect to our hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate
mortgage-backed securities and may even result in losses. With respect to our adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities, during a period of rising interest rates the adjustable coupon rates on
our adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities would increase along with the increase in their
related borrowing costs such that the net interest spread on these assets would remain
substantially unchanged.
As a means to mitigate the negative impact of a rising interest rate environment on the net
interest spread of our hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities, we may
enter into derivative contracts, such as Eurodollar futures contracts, interest rate swap contracts
and interest rate cap contracts. Hedging techniques are based, in part, on assumed levels of
prepayments of the hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities that are being
hedged. If actual prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the hybrid
adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities being hedged will be longer or shorter,
which could reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies that we may utilize and may result
in losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are
highly complex and may produce volatile returns.
All of our hedging activities are also limited by the asset and sources-of-income requirements
applicable to us as a REIT.
Extension Risk
Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities
have interest rates that are fixed for the first few years of the mortgage loan or mortgage-backed
security typically three, five, seven or 10 years and thereafter their interest rates reset
periodically. At March 31, 2007, 18.2% of our total mortgage assets were comprised of hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage loans and we held no hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. We
compute the projected weighted-average life of our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities based on the markets assumptions regarding the rate at which the
borrowers will prepay our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and the mortgage loans underlying
our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. During a period of interest rate increases,
prepayment rates on our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and the mortgage loans underlying our
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities may decrease and cause the weighted-average life
of our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities
to lengthen. During a period of interest rate decreases, prepayment rates on our hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage loans and the mortgage loans underlying our hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities may increase and cause the weighted-average life of our hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities to shorten.
The possibility that our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities may lengthen due to slower prepayment activity is commonly known as
extension risk. See Prepayment Risk below.
When we acquire hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans or hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities, and finance them with borrowings, we may, but are not required to,
enter into derivative contracts to effectively fix, or hedge, our borrowing costs for a period
close to the anticipated weighted-average life of the fixed-rate portion of the related hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage loan or hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security. This hedging
strategy is designed to protect us from rising interest rates because the borrowing costs are fixed
for the duration of the fixed-rate portion of the related hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loan or
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security. Depending upon the type of derivative contract
that we use to hedge these borrowing costs however, extension risk related to the hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage loans or hybrid adjustable-rate
52
mortgage-backed securities being hedged may cause a mismatch with the hedging instruments and
negatively impact the desired result from our hedging activities. In extreme situations, we may be
forced to sell assets and incur losses to maintain adequate liquidity.
Certain mortgage loans that we purchase directly and certain mortgage loans collateralizing
mortgage-backed securities that we purchase permit negative amortization. A negative amortization
provision in a mortgage loan allows the borrower to defer payment of a portion or all of the
monthly interest accrued on the mortgage loan and to add the deferred interest amount to the
principal balance of the mortgage loan. As a result, during periods of negative amortization, the
principal balances of negatively amortizing mortgage loans will increase and their weighted-average
lives will extend.
Interest Rate Cap Risk
We also invest in residential mortgage loans and adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities that are based on mortgages that are typically subject to periodic and
lifetime interest rate caps. These interest rate caps limit the amount by which the coupon rate of
these mortgage loans and adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities may
change during any given period.
However, the borrowing costs related to our mortgage assets are not subject to similar
restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates, interest rate costs on the
borrowings for our mortgage assets could increase without the limitation of interest rate caps,
while the corresponding increase in coupon rates on our residential mortgage loans and
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities could be limited by interest
rate caps. This problem will be magnified to the extent that we acquire mortgage loans and
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities that are not based on
mortgages that are fully-indexed.
In addition, our residential mortgage loans and adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some portion of
the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. The presence of these payment
caps could result in our receipt of less cash income on our residential mortgage loans and
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities than we need in order to pay
the interest cost on our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net interest income or
cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would negatively impact our
financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We may purchase a variety of hedging instruments to mitigate these risks.
Prepayment Risk
Prepayments are the full or partial unscheduled repayment of principal prior to the original
term to maturity of a loan. Prepayment rates for mortgage loans and mortgage loans underlying
mortgage-backed securities generally increase when prevailing interest rates fall below the market
rate existing when the mortgages were originated. Prepayment rates on adjustable-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities generally increase when the difference between long-term
and short-term interest rates declines or becomes negative. Prepayments of mortgage-backed
securities could harm our results of operations in several ways. Some of our adjustable-rate
mortgage loans and the mortgage loans underlying our adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities may
bear initial teaser interest rates that are lower than their fully-indexed rate, which refers
to the applicable index rates plus a margin. In the event that we owned such an adjustable-rate
mortgage loan or adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security and it is prepaid prior to or soon after
the time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate, then we would have held such loan or security while
it was less profitable and lost the opportunity to receive interest at the fully-indexed rate over
the expected life of the mortgage loan or adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security. In addition, we
currently own mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities that were purchased at a premium. The
prepayment of such mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities at a rate faster than anticipated
would result in a write-off of any remaining capitalized premium amount and a consequent reduction
of our net interest income by such amount. Finally, in the event that we are unable to acquire new
mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities to replace the
53
prepaid mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, our financial condition, cash flow and
results of operations could be negatively impacted. At March 31, 2007, 61% of our mortgage loans
contained prepayment penalty provisions. Generally, mortgage loans with prepayment penalty
provisions are less likely to prepay than mortgage loans without prepayment penalty provisions.
Risk Management
To the extent consistent with maintaining our status as a REIT, we seek to manage our interest
rate risk exposure to protect our portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and related debt against
the effects of major interest rate changes. We generally seek to manage our interest rate risk by:
|
|
|
monitoring and adjusting, if necessary, the reset index and interest rate related to our
mortgage-backed securities and our borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
attempting to structure our borrowing agreements to have a range of different maturities,
terms, amortizations and interest rate adjustment periods; |
|
|
|
|
using derivatives, financial futures, swaps, options, caps, floors and forward sales to
adjust the interest rate sensitivity of our mortgage-backed securities and our borrowings;
and |
|
|
|
|
actively managing, on an aggregate basis, the interest rate indices, interest rate
adjustment periods and gross reset margins of our mortgage-backed securities and the interest
rate indices and adjustment periods of our borrowings. |
We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets,
liabilities and hedging instruments. Duration essentially measures the market price volatility of
financial instruments as interest rates change. We generally calculate duration using various
financial models and empirical data. Different models and methodologies can produce different
duration numbers for the same financial instruments. We reduce our sensitivity to interest rates by
matching the income we earn on our mortgage assets with the cost of our related liabilities. We
also engage in various hedging activities designed to match the terms of our assets and liabilities
more closely. In general, we manage our net asset/liability duration gap to less than six months.
Our net asset/liability duration gap is defined as the estimated maturity or repricing of our
mortgage assets less the estimated maturity or repricing of our borrowings and derivative
instruments. The closer the net asset/liability duration gap is to zero, the less impact interest
rate changes will have on the market value of our portfolio and net interest income. A positive
net asset/liability duration gap indicates that in a period of rising interest rates the market
value of our portfolio and net interest income would rise. A negative net asset/liability duration
gap will generate opposite results. Our net asset/liability duration gap was approximately one
month at March 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Conclusion Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At March 31, 2007, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have
performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined
in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, and concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and our disclosure controls and procedures are
also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
54
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the first quarter of our fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
55
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
At March 31, 2007, no legal proceedings were pending to which we were party or of which any of
our properties were subject.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For additional risk factor information about us, please refer to Item 1A of our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Notes.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None
Item 5. Other Information.
On May 7, 2007, our board of directors appointed S. Trezevant Moore, Jr. as our Chief
Executive Officer effective May 10, 2007. Mr. Moore succeeds Gail P. Seneca, who continues as our
Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Moore has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since March 2005 and as a
member of our board of directors since November 2005. For five years prior to joining us in March
2005, Mr. Moore was the executive vice president of capital markets for Radian Guaranty Inc. Prior
to his service at Radian, Mr. Moore held several senior level positions in the mortgage industry,
including First Union National Bank from 1977 to 2000, Nationsbanc Capital Markets from 1994 to
1997, Citicorp Securities from 1989 to 1994 and First Boston from
1984 to 1989. Mr. Moore is a
director of Donegal Group Inc.
Effective May 10, 2007, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Ms.
Seneca with a term that continues until December 31, 2008. Under the agreement, Ms. Seneca is
entitled to receive an annual base salary of $300,000 and on January 1, 2008, a restricted stock
award of 50,000 shares or our common stock, which will vest in two installments commencing January
1, 2009, unless and earlier acceleration of vesting occurs as specified in the agreement. The
agreement is filed with this 10-Q as an exhibit, and terms of the agreement are incorporated by
reference into this item 5.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the Signatures section of this report) are
included, or incorporated by reference, in this Form 10-Q.
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ S. TREZEVANT MOORE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Trezevant Moore |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher J. Zyda |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 10, 2007 |
57
EXHIBIT INDEX
Pursuant to Item 601(a) (2) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit index immediately precedes any
exhibits filed herewith.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Form 10-Q and are
numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of May 10, 2007
between the Registrant and Gail P. Seneca. |
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of S. Trezevant
Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Christopher J.
Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of S. Trezevant
Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Christopher J.
Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
*Filed
herewith.
58