UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 001-11311

LEAR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		13-3386776
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

21557 Telegraph Road, Southfield, MI		48033
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

(248) 447-1500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                 Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).                 Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ           

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 of 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes þ No o           

As of July 29, 2011, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock was 103,869,806 shares.

 

 

LEAR CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 2, 2011

INDEX

		Page No.
Part I — Financial Information
Item 1 — Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Introduction to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - July 2, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010			4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) - Three and Six Months Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010			5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Six Months Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010			6
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			7
Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			30
Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (included in Item 2)
Item 4 — Controls and Procedures			44
Part II — Other Information
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings			44
Item 1A — Risk Factors			44
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			44
Item 6 — Exhibits			45
Signatures			46
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

LEAR CORPORATION

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 — CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INTRODUCTION TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements of Lear Corporation and subsidiaries, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. We believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The financial information presented reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, cash flows and financial position for the interim periods presented. These results are not necessarily indicative of a full year’s results of operations.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)

		July 2,				December 31,
		2011(2)				2010
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,771.2			$	1,654.1
Accounts receivable			2,279.7				1,758.4
Inventories			657.6				554.2
Other			529.7				418.8
Total current assets			5,238.2				4,385.5
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
Property, plant and equipment, net			1,084.7				994.7
Goodwill			651.6				614.6
Other			564.5				626.3
Total long-term assets			2,300.8				2,235.6
Total assets		$	7,539.0			$	6,621.1
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term borrowings		$	2.5			$	4.1
Accounts payable and drafts			2,311.0				1,838.4
Accrued liabilities			1,073.0				976.0
Total current liabilities			3,386.5				2,818.5
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt			695.1				694.9
Other			555.5				538.9
Total long-term liabilities			1,250.6				1,233.8
EQUITY:
Series A convertible preferred stock, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 10,896,250 shares issued as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010; and no shares outstanding as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010			—				—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 106,215,419 and 105,498,880 shares issued as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively (1)			1.1				1.1
Additional paid-in capital, including warrants to purchase common stock			2,133.8				2,116.0
Common stock held in treasury, 2,354,956 and 322,130 shares as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, at cost (1)			(115.7	)			(13.4	)
Retained earnings			741.2				434.5
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			32.3				(78.0	)
Lear Corporation stockholders’ equity			2,792.7				2,460.2
Noncontrolling interests			109.2				108.6
Equity			2,901.9				2,568.8
Total liabilities and equity		$	7,539.0			$	6,621.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated balance sheets.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited; in millions, except per share data)

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,				July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net sales		$	3,676.3			$	3,039.3			$	7,188.0			$	5,977.8
Cost of sales			3,329.7				2,746.5				6,518.0				5,430.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses			119.2				112.8				236.7				240.7
Amortization of intangible assets			7.2				6.6				14.0				13.3
Interest expense			10.7				13.3				14.0				32.3
Other (income) expense, net			4.1				(22.5	)			(2.8	)			(1.5	)
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes			205.4				182.6				408.1				262.8
Provision for income taxes			19.7				17.3				59.7				23.7
Consolidated net income			185.7				165.3				348.4				239.1
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests			8.2				5.5				14.9				13.2
Net income attributable to Lear		$	177.5			$	159.8			$	333.5			$	225.9
Basic net income per share attributable to Lear (1)		$	1.70			$	1.58			$	3.18			$	2.27
Diluted net income per share attributable to Lear (1)		$	1.65			$	1.48			$	3.09			$	2.09

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited; in millions)

		Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Consolidated net income		$	348.4			$	239.1
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			125.8				115.6
Net change in working capital items			(131.5	)			(49.0	)
Other, net			18.2				(39.7	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			360.9				266.0
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment			(156.2	)			(76.4	)
Other, net			20.7				2.6
Net cash used in investing activities			(135.5	)			(73.8	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from the issuance of senior notes			—				694.5
First lien credit agreement repayments			—				(375.0	)
Second lien credit agreement repayments			—				(550.0	)
Other long-term debt repayments, net			(1.1	)			(6.1	)
Short-term debt repayments, net			(1.6	)			(13.9	)
Payment of debt issuance costs			(4.8	)			(17.6	)
Repurchase of common stock			(100.0	)			—
Dividends paid to Lear Corporation stockholders			(25.7	)			—
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests			(18.2	)			(4.6	)
Other			(1.6	)			1.1
Net cash used in financing activities			(153.0	)			(271.6	)
Effect of foreign currency translation			44.7				(54.3	)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents			117.1				(133.7	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents as of Beginning of Period			1,654.1				1,554.0
Cash and Cash Equivalents as of End of Period		$	1,771.2			$	1,420.3
Changes in Working Capital Items:
Accounts receivable		$	(450.8	)		$	(471.7	)
Inventories			(84.3	)			(77.8	)
Accounts payable			385.6				337.5
Accrued liabilities and other			18.0				163.0
Net change in working capital items		$	(131.5	)		$	(49.0	)
Supplementary Disclosure:
Cash paid for interest		$	28.4			$	29.9
Cash paid for income taxes, net		$	49.9			$	38.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Basis of Presentation

Lear Corporation (“Lear,” and together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”) and its affiliates design and manufacture complete automotive seat systems and related components, as well as electrical distribution systems and related components. The Company’s main customers are automotive original equipment manufacturers. The Company operates facilities worldwide.

On November 9, 2009, Lear and certain of its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries emerged from bankruptcy proceedings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 11”). In accordance with the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM (“ASC”) 852, “Reorganizations,” Lear adopted fresh-start accounting upon its emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and became a new entity for financial reporting purposes as of November 7, 2009. For further information, see Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” and Note 2, “Reorganization under Chapter 11,” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lear, a Delaware corporation, and the wholly owned and less than wholly owned subsidiaries controlled by Lear. In addition, Lear consolidates variable interest entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. Investments in affiliates in which Lear does not have control, but does have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, are accounted for under the equity method.

The Company’s annual financial results are reported on a calendar year basis and quarterly interim results are reported using a thirteen week reporting calendar.

Certain amounts in the prior period’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in the quarter ended July 2, 2011.

Cost of Sales and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Cost of sales includes material, labor and overhead costs associated with the manufacture and distribution of the Company’s products. Distribution costs include inbound freight costs, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs and other costs of the Company’s distribution network. Selling, general and administrative expenses include selling, engineering and development and administrative costs not directly associated with the manufacture and distribution of the Company’s products.

(2) Restructuring Activities

In 2005, the Company initiated a multi-year operational restructuring strategy to (i) eliminate excess capacity and lower the operating costs of the Company, (ii) streamline the Company’s organizational structure and reposition its business for improved long-term profitability and (iii) better align the Company’s manufacturing footprint with the changing needs of its customers. In light of industry conditions and customer announcements, the Company expanded this strategy, and through the end of 2010, the Company incurred pretax restructuring costs of $736.1 million. The Company expects elevated restructuring actions and related investments to continue in 2011 and to moderate thereafter.

Restructuring costs include employee termination benefits, fixed asset impairment charges and contract termination costs, as well as other incremental costs resulting from the restructuring actions. These incremental costs principally include equipment and personnel relocation costs. The Company also incurs incremental manufacturing inefficiency costs at the operating locations impacted by the restructuring actions during the related restructuring implementation period. Restructuring costs are recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Generally, charges are recorded as restructuring actions are approved and/or implemented.

In the first half of 2011, the Company recorded charges of $4.6 million in connection with its restructuring actions. These charges consist of $3.4 million recorded as cost of sales and $1.2 million recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses. The 2011 charges consist of employee termination benefits of $3.2 million, as well as other related restructuring costs of $1.4 million. Employee termination benefits were recorded based on existing union and employee contracts, statutory requirements and completed negotiations. The Company expects to incur approximately $41.7 million of additional restructuring costs related to activities initiated as of July 2, 2011. Although each restructuring action is unique, based upon the nature of the Company’s operations, the Company expects that the allocation of future restructuring costs will be consistent with historical experience.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

A summary of 2011 activity is shown below (in millions):

		Accrual as of				2011				Utilization								Accrual as of
		January 1, 2011				Charges				Cash				Non-cash				July 2, 2011
Employee termination benefits		$	38.4				3.2				(8.8	)			—			$	32.8
Contract termination costs			3.7				—				—				—				3.7
Other related costs			—				1.4				(1.4	)			—				—
Total		$	42.1			$	4.6			$	(10.2	)		$	—			$	36.5

(3) Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Finished goods and work-in-process inventories include material, labor and manufacturing overhead costs. A summary of inventories is shown below (in millions):

		July 2,				December 31,
		2011				2010
Raw materials		$	541.7			$	448.6
Work-in-process			36.1				32.9
Finished goods			79.8				72.7
Inventories		$	657.6			$	554.2

(4) Pre-Production Costs Related to Long-Term Supply Agreements

The Company incurs pre-production engineering and development (“E&D”) and tooling costs related to the products produced for its customers under long-term supply agreements. The Company expenses all pre-production E&D costs for which reimbursement is not contractually guaranteed by the customer. In addition, the Company expenses all pre-production tooling costs related to customer-owned tools for which reimbursement is not contractually guaranteed by the customer or for which the Company does not have a non-cancelable right to use the tooling. During the first six months of 2011 and 2010, the Company capitalized $87.2 million and $63.2 million, respectively, of pre-production E&D costs for which reimbursement is contractually guaranteed by the customer. In addition, during the first six months of 2011 and 2010, the Company capitalized $68.7 million and $67.6 million, respectively, of pre-production tooling costs related to customer-owned tools for which reimbursement is contractually guaranteed by the customer or for which the Company has a non-cancelable right to use the tooling. These amounts are included in other current and long-term assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, the Company collected $162.5 million and $126.1 million, respectively, of cash related to E&D and tooling costs.

The classification of recoverable customer engineering, development and tooling costs related to long-term supply agreements is shown below (in millions):

		July 2,				December 31,
		2011				2010
Current		$	75.1			$	77.9
Long-term			71.0				75.3
Recoverable customer engineering, development and tooling		$	146.1			$	153.2

(5) Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost; however, as a result of fresh-start accounting, property, plant and equipment was re-measured at fair value as of November 7, 2009. For further information, see Note 3, “Fresh-Start Accounting,” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Costs associated with the repair and maintenance of the Company’s property, plant and equipment are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with improvements which extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the efficiency or safety of the Company’s property, plant and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the related asset. Depreciable property is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, using principally the straight-line method.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

A summary of property, plant and equipment is shown below (in millions):

		July 2,				December 31,
		2011				2010
Land		$	113.9			$	106.0
Buildings and improvements			403.4				360.6
Machinery and equipment			912.8				761.8
Construction in progress			15.2				5.7
Total property, plant and equipment			1,445.3				1,234.1
Less — accumulated depreciation			(360.6	)			(239.4	)
Net property, plant and equipment		$	1,084.7			$	994.7

Depreciation expense was $57.2 million and $50.5 million in the three months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively, and $111.8 million and $102.3 million in the six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively.

The Company monitors its long-lived assets for impairment indicators on an ongoing basis in accordance with GAAP. If impairment indicators exist, the Company performs the required impairment analysis by comparing the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the long-lived assets to the related net book values. If the net book value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is measured and recognized. The Company does not believe that there were any indicators that would have resulted in long-lived asset impairment charges as of July 2, 2011. The Company will, however, continue to assess the impact of any significant industry events and long-term automotive production estimates on the realization of its long-lived assets.

(6) Goodwill

A summary of the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, all of which relates to the seating segment, for the six months ended July 2, 2011, is shown below (in millions):

Balance as of January 1, 2011		$	614.6
Acquisition			15.0
Foreign currency translation			22.0
Balance as of July 2, 2011		$	651.6

Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis. Impairment testing is required more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have occurred. In conducting its impairment testing, the Company compares the fair value of each of its reporting units to the related net book value. If the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured and recognized. The Company conducts its annual impairment testing as of the first day of the fourth quarter.

The Company does not believe that there were any indicators that would have resulted in goodwill impairment charges as of July 2, 2011. The Company will, however, continue to assess the impact of any significant industry events and long-term automotive production estimates on its recorded goodwill.

(7) Long-Term Debt

A summary of long-term debt and the related weighted average interest rates is shown below (in millions):

		July 2, 2011								December 31, 2010
						Weighted								Weighted
						Average								Average
		Long-Term Debt				Interest Rate				Long-Term Debt				Interest Rate
7.875% Senior Notes due 2018		$	347.8				8.00	%		$	347.7				8.00	%
8.125% Senior Notes due 2020			347.3				8.25	%			347.2				8.25	%
Long-term debt		$	695.1							$	694.9

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

Senior Notes

The Company’s long-term debt consists of $350 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of senior unsecured notes due 2018 with a stated coupon rate of 7.875% (the “2018 Notes”) and $350 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of senior unsecured notes due 2020 with a stated coupon rate of 8.125% (the “2020 Notes” and together with the 2018 Notes, the “Notes”). The 2018 Notes were priced at 99.276% of par, resulting in a yield to maturity of 8.00%, and the 2020 Notes were priced at 99.164% of par, resulting in a yield to maturity of 8.25%. The Notes were issued on March 26, 2010, and the net proceeds, together with existing cash on hand, were used to repay in full an aggregate amount of $925.0 million of term loans provided under the Company’s first and second lien credit agreements.

Interest is payable on the Notes on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2010. The 2018 Notes mature on March 15, 2018, and the 2020 Notes mature on March 15, 2020.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations. Obligations under the Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis, by certain of Lear’s domestic subsidiaries, which are directly or indirectly 100% owned by Lear (see Note 17, “Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements”).

The indenture governing the Notes contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional debt, (ii) pay dividends and make other restricted payments, (iii) create or permit certain liens, (iv) issue or sell capital stock of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries, (v) use the proceeds from sales of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) create or permit restrictions on the ability of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Company, (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates, (viii) enter into sale and leaseback transactions and (ix) consolidate or merge or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. The foregoing limitations are subject to exceptions as set forth in the Notes. In addition, if in the future the Notes have an investment grade credit rating from both Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and no default has occurred and is continuing, certain of these covenants will, thereafter, no longer apply to the Notes for so long as the Notes have an investment grade credit rating by both rating agencies. The indenture governing the Notes also contains customary events of default. As of July 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the indenture governing the Notes.

Revolving Credit Facility

On June 17, 2011, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its senior secured credit agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement” or the “first lien credit agreement”) to, among other things, (i) extend the maturity of the Company’s existing revolving credit facility from March 18, 2013 to June 17, 2016, (ii) increase the amount available under its existing revolving credit facility from $110 million to $500 million, (iii) adjust the interest rates payable on outstanding borrowings, as described below, and (iv) modify the covenants under the existing credit agreement to provide the Company with significant flexibility with respect to certain actions. In connection with this amendment and restatement, the Company paid debt issuance costs of $4.8 million in the second quarter of 2011. The revolving credit facility permits borrowings for general corporate and working capital purposes and the issuance of letters of credit. As of July 2, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

Advances under the revolving credit facility generally bear interest at a variable rate per annum equal to (i) the Eurocurrency Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus an adjustable margin of 1.375% to 3.0% based on the Company’s corporate rating (2.25% as of July 2, 2011), payable on the last day of each applicable interest period but in no event less frequently than quarterly, or (ii) the Adjusted Base Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus an adjustable margin of 0.375% to 2.0% based on the Company’s corporate rating (1.25% as of July 2, 2011), payable quarterly. A facility fee is payable which ranges from 0.375% to 0.50% of the total amount committed under the revolving credit facility.

Obligations under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are secured on a first priority basis by a lien on substantially all of the U.S. assets of Lear and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as 100% of the stock of Lear’s domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the stock of certain of Lear’s foreign subsidiaries. In addition, obligations under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a first priority basis, by certain of Lear’s domestic subsidiaries, which are directly or indirectly 100% owned by Lear (see Note 17, “Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements”).

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains various customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company, including, without limitation, (i) covenants regarding maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage, (ii) limitations on fundamental changes involving the Company or its subsidiaries and (iii) limitations on indebtedness, liens, investments and restricted

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

payments. As of July 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the agreement governing the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

As discussed above, in 2010, the Company used the net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes, together with existing cash on hand, to repay in full all amounts outstanding under the term loans provided under the Company’s first and second lien credit agreements. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the repayment of the term loans and the related amendments to the first lien credit agreement, the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $11.8 million in the first quarter of 2010, resulting from the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, and paid debt issuance costs of $17.6 million in the first half of 2010. The debt issuance costs are being amortized over the life of the related debt. The loss on the extinguishment of debt is recorded in other (income) expense, net. See Note 9, “Other (Income) Expense, Net.”

For further information on the Notes and the revolving credit facility, see Note 8, “Long-Term Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

(8) Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

Net Periodic Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Cost

The components of the Company’s net periodic pension benefit cost are shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended																Six Months Ended
		July 2, 2011								July 3, 2010								July 2, 2011								July 3, 2010
		U.S.				Foreign				U.S.				Foreign				U.S.				Foreign				U.S.				Foreign
Service cost		$	0.7			$	1.6			$	0.8			$	1.0			$	1.4			$	3.4			$	1.6			$	2.3
Interest cost			5.9				6.1				5.8				5.2				11.7				12.7				11.5				11.9
Expected return on plan assets			(6.5	)			(7.7	)			(5.9	)			(5.8	)			(13.1	)			(15.8	)			(11.7	)			(13.7	)
Amortization of actuarial loss			—				0.1				—				—				—				0.2				—				—
Settlement gain			—				—				—				—				(0.1	)			—				(0.1	)			—
Net periodic benefit cost		$	0.1			$	0.1			$	0.7			$	0.4			$	(0.1	)		$	0.5			$	1.3			$	0.5

The components of the Company’s net periodic other postretirement benefit cost are shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended																Six Months Ended
		July 2, 2011								July 3, 2010								July 2, 2011								July 3, 2010
		U.S.				Foreign				U.S.				Foreign				U.S.				Foreign				U.S.				Foreign
Service cost		$	0.1			$	0.1			$	0.1			$	0.2			$	0.2			$	0.4			$	0.3			$	0.3
Interest cost			1.4				1.1				1.4				0.9				2.7				2.0				2.7				1.8
Amortization of actuarial loss			0.1				—				—				—				0.2				—				—				—
Special termination benefits			—				—				—				0.1				—				—				—				0.1
Net periodic benefit cost		$	1.6			$	1.2			$	1.5			$	1.2			$	3.1			$	2.4			$	3.0			$	2.2

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

Contributions

Employer contributions to the Company’s domestic and foreign pension plans for the six months ended July 2, 2011, were $0.3 million, in aggregate. Based on minimum funding requirements, the Company expects total required contributions of $10 to $15 million to its domestic and foreign pension plans, in aggregate, in 2011. The Company may elect to make contributions in excess of minimum funding requirements in response to investment performance or changes in interest rates or when the Company believes that it is financially advantageous to do so and based on its other cash requirements.

Employer contributions to the Company’s defined contribution retirement program for its salaried employees, determined as a percentage of each covered employee’s eligible compensation, for the six months ended July 2, 2011, were $6.8 million. The Company expects total contributions of approximately $13 million to this program in 2011.

Recent Legislation

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care Education and Affordability Reconciliation Act (the “Acts”) were signed into law. The Acts contain provisions which impact the Company’s accounting for retiree medical benefits. The impact of these provisions was not significant and was included in the determination of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plan obligation as of December 31, 2010. The Company will continue to assess the provisions of the Acts and may consider plan amendments to respond to the provisions of the Acts.

(9) Other (Income) Expense, Net

Other (income) expense, net includes equity in net income of affiliates, non-income related taxes, foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses related to certain derivative instruments and hedging activities, gains and losses on the sales of assets and other miscellaneous income and expense. A summary of other (income) expense, net is shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,				July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Other expense		$	8.9			$	4.0			$	8.3			$	20.5
Other income			(4.8	)			(26.5	)			(11.1	)			(22.0	)
Other (income) expense, net		$	4.1			$	(22.5	)		$	(2.8	)		$	(1.5	)

For the six months ended July 2, 2011, other income includes a gain of $3.9 million related to a fair market value adjustment in conjunction with a transaction with an affiliate. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, other income includes equity in net income of affiliates of $3.9 million and $8.0 million respectively.

For the six months ended July 3, 2010, other expense includes a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $11.8 million, resulting from the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, and foreign exchange losses of $7.5 million. For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, other income includes equity in net income of affiliates of $17.0 million and $17.8 million, respectively. Other income also includes foreign exchange gains of $5.5 million and a gain of $1.8 million related to a transaction with an affiliate for the three months ended July 3, 2010.

(10) Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $19.7 million for the second quarter of 2011, representing an effective tax rate of 9.6% on pretax income of $205.4 million, as compared to $17.3 million for the second quarter of 2010, representing an effective tax rate of 9.5% on pretax income of $182.6 million. The provision for income taxes was $59.7 million for the six months ended July 2, 2011, representing an effective tax rate of 14.6% on pretax income of $408.1 million, as compared to $23.7 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010, representing an effective tax rate of 9.0% on a pretax income of $262.8 million.

In the first half of 2011, the provision for income taxes was primarily impacted by the mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions, as well as a tax benefit of $19.5 million related to the reversal of a full valuation allowance with respect to the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The provision was also impacted by a portion of the Company’s restructuring charges and other expenses, for which no tax benefit was provided as the charges were incurred in certain countries for which no tax benefit is likely to be realized due to a history of operating losses in those countries. In the first half of 2010, the provision for income taxes was impacted by the mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions, as well as a tax benefit of $32.8 million, including interest, related to reductions in recorded tax reserves. The provision was also impacted by a portion of the Company’s restructuring charges and other expenses, for which no tax

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

benefit was provided as the charges were incurred in certain countries for which no tax benefit is likely to be realized due to a history of operating losses in those countries. Excluding these items, the effective tax rate in the first half of 2011 and 2010 approximated the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% adjusted for income taxes on foreign earnings, losses and remittances, foreign and U.S. valuation allowances, tax credits, income tax incentives and other permanent items.

Further, the Company’s current and future provision for income taxes is significantly impacted by the initial recognition of and changes in valuation allowances in certain countries, particularly the United States. The Company intends to maintain these allowances until it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. The Company’s future income taxes will include no tax benefit with respect to losses incurred and no tax expense with respect to income generated in these countries until the respective valuation allowances are eliminated. Accordingly, income taxes are impacted by the U.S. and foreign valuation allowances and the mix of earnings among jurisdictions.

The Company was profitable in 2010 and 2009 in several international jurisdictions for which it has provided a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. If the Company continues to experience sustained levels of profitability in these jurisdictions, its assessment of the need for a full valuation allowance with respect to the deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions could change. Any reduction to a valuation allowance will reduce the Company’s tax expense in the quarter in which such reduction occurs.

In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, the Company increased its U.S. net operating loss carryforwards and retained its capital loss and tax credit carryforwards (collectively, the “Tax Attributes”). However, Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Sections 382 and 383 provide an annual limitation with respect to the ability of a corporation to utilize its Tax Attributes, as well as certain built-in-losses, against future U.S. taxable income in the event of a change in ownership. The Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings is considered a change in ownership for purposes of IRC Section 382. The limitation under the IRC is based on the value of the corporation as of the emergence date. As a result, the Company’s future U.S. taxable income may not be fully offset by the Tax Attributes if such income exceeds its annual limitation, and the Company may incur a tax liability with respect to such income. In addition, subsequent changes in ownership for purposes of the IRC could further limit the Company’s ability to use its Tax Attributes.

For further information , see Note 9, “Income Taxes,” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

(11) Net Income Per Share Attributable to Lear

Basic net income per share attributable to Lear was computed using the two-class method by dividing net income attributable to Lear, after deducting undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities, by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Common shares issuable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions pursuant to a contractual agreement, such as those common shares contemplated as part of the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, are considered common shares outstanding and are included in the computation of basic net income per share attributable to Lear. The Company’s preferred shares that were outstanding during a portion of 2010 were considered participating securities. There were no preferred shares outstanding during 2011 as all of the Company’s remaining preferred shares outstanding were converted into shares of common stock on November 10, 2010. For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, average participating securities outstanding were 4,028,708 and 5,525,554, respectively (such securities were convertible into 8,057,416 and 11,051,108 shares, respectively, of common stock after giving effect to the two-for-one stock split described in Note 12, “Comprehensive Income and Equity”).

Diluted net income per share attributable to Lear was computed using the treasury stock method by dividing net income attributable to Lear by the average number of common shares outstanding, including the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents using the average share price during the period.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

A summary of information used to compute basic net income per share attributable to Lear is shown below (in millions, except share data):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,				July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net income attributable to Lear		$	177.5			$	159.8			$	333.5			$	225.9
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities			—				(12.8	)			—				(25.1	)
Net income available to Lear common shareholders		$	177.5			$	147.0			$	333.5			$	200.8
Average common shares outstanding (1)			104,667,070				92,932,786				104,864,806				88,302,308
Basic net income per share attributable to Lear (1)		$	1.70			$	1.58			$	3.18			$	2.27

A summary of information used to compute diluted net income per share attributable to Lear is shown below (in millions, except share data):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,				July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net income attributable to Lear		$	177.5			$	159.8			$	333.5			$	225.9
Average common shares outstanding (1)			104,667,070				92,932,786				104,864,806				88,302,308
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents (1)			2,746,466				15,162,246				2,963,343				19,740,828
Average diluted shares outstanding (1)			107,413,536				108,095,032				107,828,149				108,043,136
Diluted net income per share attributable to Lear (1)		$	1.65			$	1.48			$	3.09			$	2.09

The Company’s participating securities were convertible into common stock on a one-for-one basis and participated ratably with common stock on dividends. Accordingly, diluted net income per share attributable to Lear computed using the two-class method produced the same result.

(12) Comprehensive Income and Equity

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is defined as all changes in the Company’s net assets except changes resulting from transactions with stockholders. It differs from net income in that certain items recorded in equity are included in comprehensive income.

A summary of comprehensive income and reconciliations of equity, Lear Corporation stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests for the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, is shown below (in millions):

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

		Three Months Ended July 2, 2011												Six Months Ended July 2, 2011
						Attributable												Attributable
						to Lear Corporation				Non-controlling								to Lear Corporation				Non-controlling
		Equity				Stockholders				Interests				Equity				Stockholders				Interests
Beginning equity balance		$	2,763.7			$	2,655.3			$	108.4			$	2,568.8			$	2,460.2			$	108.6
Stock-based compensation transactions			7.5				7.5				—				15.5				15.5				—
Repurchase of common stock			(72.6	)			(72.6	)			—				(100.0	)			(100.0	)			—
Dividends declared to Lear Corporation stockholders			(13.4	)			(13.4	)			—				(26.8	)			(26.8	)			—
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests			(8.2	)			—				(8.2	)			(18.2	)			—				(18.2	)
Addition to noncontrolling interests			—				—				—				2.4				—				2.4
Comprehensive income:
Net income			185.7				177.5				8.2				348.4				333.5				14.9
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Defined benefit plan adjustments			(0.2	)			(0.2	)			—				(0.1	)			(0.1	)			—
Derivative instruments and hedging activities			2.2				2.2				—				6.8				6.8				—
Foreign currency translation adjustments			37.2				36.4				0.8				105.1				103.6				1.5
Other comprehensive income			39.2				38.4				0.8				111.8				110.3				1.5
Comprehensive income			224.9				215.9				9.0				460.2				443.8				16.4
Ending equity balance		$	2,901.9			$	2,792.7			$	109.2			$	2,901.9			$	2,792.7			$	109.2

In the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, foreign currency translation adjustments relate primarily to the Euro.

A summary of comprehensive income and reconciliations of equity, Lear Corporation stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests for the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, is shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended July 3, 2010												Six Months Ended July 3, 2010
						Attributable												Attributable
						to Lear Corporation				Non-controlling								to Lear Corporation				Non-controlling
		Equity				Stockholders				Interests				Equity				Stockholders				Interests
Beginning equity balance		$	2,241.3			$	2,134.7			$	106.6			$	2,181.8			$	2,089.1			$	92.7
Stock-based compensation transactions			4.3				4.3				—				9.1				9.1				—
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests			(4.6	)			—				(4.6	)			(4.6	)			—				(4.6	)
Transaction with affiliates			—				—				—				6.5				—				6.5
Comprehensive income:
Net income			165.3				159.8				5.5				239.1				225.9				13.2
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Defined benefit plan adjustments			(0.3	)			(0.3	)			—				(0.2	)			(0.2	)			—
Derivative instruments and hedging activities			(14.1	)			(14.1	)			—				0.2				0.2				—
Foreign currency translation adjustments			(69.4	)			(69.9	)			0.5				(109.4	)			(109.6	)			0.2
Other comprehensive income (loss)			(83.8	)			(84.3	)			0.5				(109.4	)			(109.6	)			0.2
Comprehensive income			81.5				75.5				6.0				129.7				116.3				13.4
Ending equity balance		$	2,322.5			$	2,214.5			$	108.0			$	2,322.5			$	2,214.5			$	108.0

In the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, foreign currency translation adjustments relate primarily to the Euro.

Lear Corporation Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock Share Repurchase Program — On February 16, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a three year, $400 million common stock share repurchase program. Under this program, the Company may repurchase shares of its outstanding common stock from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions at prices, times and amounts to be determined by the Company. The common stock repurchase authorization expires on February 16, 2014. In the first half of 2011, the Company repurchased 1,988,274 shares of its outstanding common stock (share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split discussed below) at an average purchase price of $50.31 per share, including commissions, for an aggregate purchase

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

price of $100.0 million, and may repurchase an additional $300.0 million in shares of its outstanding common stock under this program. The extent to which the Company will repurchase its outstanding common stock and the timing of such repurchases will depend upon its financial condition, prevailing market conditions, alternative uses of capital and other factors. In addition, the Company’s amended and restated credit facility and bond indentures place certain limitations on the repurchase of common shares.

In addition to shares repurchased under the Company’s common stock share repurchase program described above, the Company classified shares withheld from the settlement of the Company’s restricted stock unit awards to cover minimum tax withholding requirements as common stock held in treasury in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Stock Split — On February 16, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock. On March 17, 2011, as a result of the stock split, stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 4, 2011, received one additional share of common stock for every one share of the common stock held by the stockholders of record. The additional shares of common stock were distributed on March 17, 2011. In addition, the Company recorded a transfer from additional paid-in-capital to common stock of $0.5 million, representing $0.01 par value of each share of common stock issued as a result of the stock split. Except as otherwise expressly stated, all issued common stock shares and per share amounts presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.

Quarterly Dividend — The Company’s Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.125 per share of common stock in the first and second quarters of 2011. Declared dividends totaled $26.8 million, in aggregate, of which $25.7 million was paid in 2011. Dividends payable on common shares to be distributed under the Company’s stock-based compensation program and common shares contemplated as part of the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings will be paid when such common shares are distributed.

Noncontrolling Interests

In the six months ended July 2, 2011, addition to noncontrolling interests reflects the acquisition of a controlling interest in an affiliate previously accounted for under the equity method. In the six months ended July 3, 2010, transaction with affiliates reflects the sale of noncontrolling interests in two previously wholly owned subsidiaries.

(13) Legal and Other Contingencies

As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had recorded reserves for pending legal disputes, including commercial disputes and other matters, of $20.4 million and $23.4 million, respectively. Such reserves reflect amounts recognized in accordance with GAAP and typically exclude the cost of legal representation. Product liability and warranty reserves are recorded separately from legal reserves, as described below.

Commercial Disputes

The Company is involved from time to time in legal proceedings and claims, including, without limitation, commercial or contractual disputes with its customers, suppliers and competitors. These disputes vary in nature and are usually resolved by negotiations between the parties.

On September 12, 2008, a consultant to the Company filed an arbitration action against the Company seeking royalties under the parties’ Joint Development Agreement (“JDA”) for the Company’s sales of its garage door opener products. Effective July 28, 2011, the parties executed a settlement agreement under which the parties fully resolved the dispute.

Product Liability and Warranty Matters

In the event that use of the Company’s products results in, or is alleged to result in, bodily injury and/or property damage or other losses, the Company may be subject to product liability lawsuits and other claims. Such lawsuits generally seek compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorney fees and costs. In addition, the Company is a party to warranty-sharing and other agreements with certain of its customers related to its products. These customers may pursue claims against the Company for contribution of all or a portion of the amounts sought in connection with product liability and warranty claims. The Company can provide no assurance that it will not experience material claims in the future or that it will not incur significant costs to defend such claims. In addition, if any of the Company’s products are, or are alleged to be, defective, the Company may be required or requested by its customers to

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

participate in a recall or other corrective action involving such products. Certain of the Company’s customers have asserted claims against the Company for costs related to recalls or other corrective actions involving its products.

In certain instances, allegedly defective products may be supplied by tier 2 suppliers. The Company may seek recovery from its suppliers of materials or services included within the Company’s products that are associated with product liability and warranty claims. The Company carries insurance for certain legal matters, including product liability claims, but such coverage may be limited. The Company does not maintain insurance for product warranty or recall matters. Future dispositions with respect to the Company’s product liability claims that were subject to compromise under the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings will be satisfied out of a common stock and warrant reserve established for that purpose.

The Company records product warranty reserves based on its individual customer agreements. Product warranty reserves are recorded for known warranty issues when liability for such issues is probable and related amounts are reasonably estimable.

A summary of the changes in reserves for product liability and warranty claims for the six months ended July 2, 2011, is shown below (in millions):

Balance as of January 1, 2011		$	43.6
Expense, net (including changes in estimates)			1.0
Settlements			(6.2	)
Foreign currency translation and other			2.5
Balance as of July 2, 2011		$	40.9

Environmental Matters

The Company is subject to local, state, federal and foreign laws, regulations and ordinances which govern activities or operations that may have adverse environmental effects and which impose liability for clean-up costs resulting from past spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous wastes and environmental compliance. The Company’s policy is to comply with all applicable environmental laws and to maintain an environmental management program based on ISO 14001 to ensure compliance with this standard. However, the Company currently is, has been and in the future may become the subject of formal or informal enforcement actions or procedures.

The Company has been named as a potentially responsible party at several third-party landfill sites and is engaged in the cleanup of hazardous waste at certain sites owned, leased or operated by the Company, including several properties acquired in its 1999 acquisition of UT Automotive, Inc. (“UT Automotive”). Certain present and former properties of UT Automotive are subject to environmental liabilities which may be significant. The Company obtained agreements and indemnities with respect to certain environmental liabilities from United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”) in connection with its acquisition of UT Automotive. UTC manages and directly funds these environmental liabilities pursuant to its agreements and indemnities with the Company.

As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had recorded environmental reserves of $2.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively. While the Company does not believe that the environmental liabilities associated with its current and former properties will have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, no assurance can be given in this regard.

Other Matters

Although the Company records reserves for legal disputes, product liability and warranty claims and environmental and other matters in accordance with GAAP, the ultimate outcomes of these matters are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ significantly from current estimates.

The Company is involved from time to time in various other legal proceedings and claims, including, without limitation, commercial and contractual disputes, intellectual property matters, personal injury claims, tax claims and employment matters. Although the outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any of these other legal proceedings or claims in which the Company is currently involved, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, no assurance can be given in this regard.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(14) Segment Reporting

The Company has two reportable operating segments: seating, which includes seat systems and related components, such as seat frames, recliner mechanisms, seat tracks, seat trim covers, headrests and seat foam, and electrical power management systems (“EPMS”), which includes wiring, connectors, junction boxes and various other components of electrical distribution systems for traditional powertrain vehicles, as well as for hybrid and electric vehicles. The other category includes unallocated costs related to corporate headquarters, geographic headquarters and the elimination of intercompany activities, none of which meets the requirements of being classified as an operating segment.

The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based primarily on (i) revenues from external customers, (ii) pretax income before interest and other (income) expense, net (“segment earnings”) and (iii) cash flows, being defined as segment earnings less capital expenditures plus depreciation and amortization. A summary of revenues from external customers and other financial information by reportable operating segment is shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended July 2, 2011
		Seating				EPMS				Other				Consolidated
Revenues from external customers		$	2,859.9			$	816.4			$	—			$	3,676.3
Segment earnings (1)			223.4				48.5				(51.7	)			220.2
Depreciation and amortization			37.9				24.5				1.9				64.3
Capital expenditures			46.4				37.1				2.2				85.7
Total assets			4,093.9				1,308.7				2,136.4				7,539.0

		Three Months Ended July 3, 2010
		Seating				EPMS				Other				Consolidated
Revenues from external customers		$	2,407.5			$	631.8			$	—			$	3,039.3
Segment earnings (1)			207.3				23.5				(57.4	)			173.4
Depreciation and amortization			35.2				20.3				1.6				57.1
Capital expenditures			24.7				14.9				2.0				41.6
Total assets			3,528.0				1,008.6				1,768.7				6,305.3

		Six Months Ended July 2, 2011
		Seating				EPMS				Other				Consolidated
Revenues from external customers		$	5,584.9			$	1,603.1			$	—			$	7,188.0
Segment earnings (1)			431.9				92.6				(105.2	)			419.3
Depreciation and amortization			75.1				47.1				3.6				125.8
Capital expenditures			79.4				74.2				2.6				156.2
Total assets			4,093.9				1,308.7				2,136.4				7,539.0

		Six Months Ended July 3, 2010
		Seating				EPMS				Other				Consolidated
Revenues from external customers		$	4,721.0			$	1,256.8			$	—			$	5,977.8
Segment earnings (1)			356.9				49.1				(112.4	)			293.6
Depreciation and amortization			71.4				41.2				3.0				115.6
Capital expenditures			47.0				26.6				2.8				76.4
Total assets			3,528.0				1,008.6				1,768.7				6,305.3

For the three months ended July 2, 2011, segment earnings include restructuring charges of $1.9 million, $1.0 million and $0.1 million in the seating and EPMS segments and in the other category, respectively. For the six months ended July 2, 2011, segment earnings include restructuring charges of $3.4 million, $1.1 million and $0.1 million in the seating and EPMS segments and in the other category, respectively. For the three months ended July 3, 2010, segment earnings include restructuring charges of $1.7 million, $9.0

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

million and $0.9 million in the seating and EPMS segments and in the other category, respectively. For the six months ended July 3, 2010, segment earnings include restructuring charges of $8.9 million, $14.2 million and $1.2 million in the seating and EPMS segments and in the other category, respectively. See Note 2, “Restructuring Activities.”

A reconciliation of consolidated segment earnings to consolidated income before provision for income taxes is shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,				July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Segment earnings		$	220.2			$	173.4			$	419.3			$	293.6
Interest expense			10.7				13.3				14.0				32.3
Other (income) expense, net			4.1				(22.5	)			(2.8	)			(1.5	)
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes		$	205.4			$	182.6			$	408.1			$	262.8

(15) Financial Instruments

The carrying values of the Company’s debt instruments vary from their fair values. The fair values were determined by reference to the quoted market prices of these securities. As of July 2, 2011, the aggregate carrying value of the Company’s Notes was $695.1 million, as compared to an estimated aggregate fair value of $755.8 million. As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate carrying value of the Company’s Notes was $694.9 million, as compared to an estimated aggregate fair value of $755.6 million.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company has used derivative financial instruments, including forwards, futures, options, swaps and other derivative contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices and the resulting variability of the Company’s operating results. The Company is not a party to leveraged derivatives. On the date that a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either (1) a hedge of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a cash flow hedge) or (3) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation (a net investment hedge).

Foreign exchange — The Company uses forward foreign exchange, futures and option contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on known foreign currency exposures. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments are intended to offset gains and losses on the hedged transaction in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Currently, the principal currencies hedged by the Company include the Mexican peso, various European currencies and the Chinese renminbi. Forward foreign exchange, futures and option contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges when the hedged item is a forecasted transaction or relates to the variability of cash flows to be received or paid. As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, contracts designated as cash flow hedges with $241.5 million and $174.7 million, respectively, of notional amount were outstanding with maturities of less than six months and 12 months, respectively. As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of these contracts was approximately $5.7 million and ($1.3) million, respectively. As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other foreign currency derivative contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting with $103.7 million and $140.6 million, respectively, of notional amount were outstanding. These foreign currency derivative contracts consist principally of hedges of cash transactions of up to six months, hedges of intercompany loans and hedges of certain other balance sheet exposures. As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of these contracts was $4.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

The fair value of outstanding foreign currency derivative contracts and the related classification in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are shown below (in millions):

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

		July 2,				December 31,
		2011				2010
Contracts qualifying for hedge accounting:
Other current assets		$	8.1			$	0.2
Other current liabilities			(2.4	)			(1.5	)
			5.7				(1.3	)
Contracts not qualifying for hedge accounting:
Other current assets			5.0				0.7
Other current liabilities			(0.4	)			(0.3	)
			4.6				0.4
		$	10.3			$	(0.9	)

Pretax amounts related to foreign currency derivative contracts that were recognized in and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are shown below (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		July 2,				July 3,				July 2,				July 3,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Contracts qualifying for hedge accounting:
Gains (losses) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		$	4.0			$	(12.0	)		$	9.2			$	4.1
Gains reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			(1.8	)			(2.8	)			(2.2	)			(4.6	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	2.2			$	(14.8	)		$	7.0			$	(0.5	)

For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, net sales includes losses of ($0.1) million and ($0.2) million, respectively, reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to foreign currency derivative contracts. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, cost of sales includes gains of $1.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively, reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to foreign currency derivative contracts. For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, net sales includes gains of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to foreign currency derivative contracts. For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, cost of sales includes gains of $2.6 million and $4.3 million, respectively, reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss related to foreign currency derivative contracts.

Interest rate — Historically, the Company used interest rate swap and other derivative contracts to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. Interest rate swap and other derivative contracts which fix the interest payments of certain variable rate debt instruments or fix the market rate component of anticipated fixed rate debt instruments were accounted for as cash flow hedges. Interest rate swap contracts which hedge the change in fair value of certain fixed rate debt instruments were accounted for as fair value hedges. As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no interest rate contracts outstanding. The Company will continue to evaluate, and may use derivative financial instruments, including forwards, futures, options, swaps and other derivative contracts to manage its exposures to fluctuations in interest rates in the future.

Commodity prices — The Company uses derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in copper prices. These derivative instruments are utilized to hedge forecasted inventory purchases and to the extent that they qualify and meet hedge accounting criteria, they are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Commodity swap contracts that are not designated as cash flow hedges are marked to market with changes in fair value recognized immediately in the condensed consolidated statements of income. See Note 9, “Other (Income) Expense, Net.” As of July 2, 2011, commodity swap contracts with $6.8 million of notional amount were outstanding with maturities of less than ten months. As of July 2, 2011, the fair market value of these contracts was ($0.2) million. As of December 31, 2010, there were no commodity swap contracts outstanding.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

The fair value of outstanding commodity swap contracts and the related classification in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of July 2, 2011, are shown below (in millions):

		July 2,
		2011
Contracts qualifying for hedge accounting:
Other current assets		$	0.1
Other current liabilities			(0.3	)
		$	(0.2	)

Pretax amounts related to commodity swap contracts that were recognized in and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are shown below (in millions):

		Six Months Ended
		July 2, 2011
Contracts qualifying for hedge accounting:
Losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		$	(0.2	)
Comprehensive loss		$	(0.2	)

As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, net gains (losses) of approximately $5.5 million and ($1.3) million, respectively, related to the Company’s derivative instruments and hedging activities were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). During the twelve month period ending July 1, 2012, the Company expects to reclassify into earnings net gains of approximately $5.5 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of July 2, 2011. Such gains will be reclassified at the time that the underlying hedged transactions are realized. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, other (income) expense, net includes gains of $1.3 million and $7.1 million, respectively, related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency derivative contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, other gains and losses recognized in other (income) expense, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income related to changes in the fair value of cash flow and fair value hedges excluded from the Company’s effectiveness assessments and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow and fair value hedges were not material.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP provides that fair value is an exit price, defined as a market-based measurement that represents the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value measurements are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

	Market:		This approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
	Income:		This approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount based on current market expectations.
	Cost:		This approach is based on the amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

Further, GAAP prioritizes the inputs and assumptions used in the valuation techniques described above into a three-tier fair value hierarchy as follows:

	Level 1:		Observable inputs, such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
	Level 2:		Inputs, other than quoted market prices included in Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly for the asset or liability.
	Level 3:		Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the exit price of the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may be used if there is little or no market data for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The Company discloses fair value measurements and the related valuation techniques and fair value hierarchy level for its assets and liabilities that are measured or disclosed at fair value.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis — Fair value measurements and the related valuation techniques and fair value hierarchy level for the Company’s assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are shown below (in millions):

		July 2, 2011
						Asset				Valuation
		Frequency				(Liability)				Technique				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Foreign currency derivative contracts		Recurring				$	10.3			Market/Income				$	—			$	10.3			$	—
Commodity swap contracts		Recurring				$	(0.2	)		Market/Income				$	—			$	(0.2	)		$	—

		December 31, 2010
										Valuation
		Frequency				Liability				Technique				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Foreign currency derivative contracts		Recurring				$	(0.9	)		Market/Income				$	—			$	(0.9	)		$	—

The Company determines the fair value of its derivative contracts using quoted market prices to calculate the forward values and then discounts such forward values to the present value. The discount rates used are based on quoted bank deposit or swap interest rates. If a derivative contract is in a net liability position, these discount rates are adjusted by an estimate of the credit spread that would be applied by market participants purchasing these contracts from the Company’s counterparties. To estimate this credit spread, the Company uses significant assumptions and factors other than quoted market rates, which would result in the classification of its derivative liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, to the extent that such adjustment is necessary. As of July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no derivative contracts that were classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, there were no transfers in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the first half of 2011.

Items measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis — The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which are not included in the table above. As these non-recurring fair value measurements are generally determined using unobservable inputs, these fair value measurements are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In the first half of 2011, there were no significant non-recurring fair value adjustments.

(16) Accounting Pronouncements

Goodwill Impairment

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended ASC 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other,” with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-28, “When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” This update requires that step 2 of the goodwill impairment test (i.e., measurement and recognition of an impairment loss) be performed if a reporting unit has a carrying value equal to or less than zero and qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The provisions of this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company’s annual goodwill impairment test is conducted as of the first day of the fourth quarter. The Company does not expect the effects of adoption to be significant.

Business Combinations

The FASB amended ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” with ASU 2010-29, “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations,” to, among other things, require pro forma revenue and earnings disclosures in comparative financial statements that reflect the results of operations of the acquired entity as though the business combination had occurred as of the beginning of the prior year. The provisions of this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company will evaluate the impact of this update on material future business combinations.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

Fair Value Measurements

The FASB amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements,” with ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” to require additional disclosures related to activity within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The provisions of this update are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The effects of adoption were not significant. For further information, see Note 15, “Financial Instruments.”

The FASB amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements,” with ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This update provides converged guidance on how to measure fair value, which is largely consistent with existing GAAP. This update also requires additional fair value measurement disclosures. The provisions of this update are effective as of January 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its financial statement disclosures.

Revenue Recognition

The FASB amended ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition,” with ASU 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” If a revenue arrangement has multiple deliverables, this update requires the allocation of revenue to the separate deliverables based on relative selling prices. In addition, this update requires additional ongoing disclosures about an entity’s multiple-element revenue arrangements. The provisions of this update were effective as of January 1, 2011. The effects of adoption were not significant.

Comprehensive Income

The FASB amended ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income,” with ASU 2001-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) — Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which revises the manner in which comprehensive income is presented in an entity’s financial statements. This update requires the presentation of the components of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The option to present comprehensive income on the statement of stockholders’ equity has been eliminated. In addition, this update requires that reclassification adjustments between other comprehensive income and net income be presented on the face of the respective financial statements. The provisions of this update are effective as of January 1, 2012. The implementation of this update will have no impact on the manner in which the Company accounts for comprehensive income.

LEAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(17) Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

		July 2, 2011
										Non-
		Lear				Guarantors				guarantors				Eliminations				Consolidated
		(Unaudited; in millions)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	815.3			$	0.2			$	955.7			$	—			$	1,771.2
Accounts receivable			39.3				340.3				1,900.1				—				2,279.7
Inventories			5.6				227.9				424.1				—				657.6
Other			145.1				36.8				347.8				—				529.7
Total current assets			1,005.3				605.2				3,627.7				—				5,238.2
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
Property, plant and equipment, net			93.3				161.9				829.5				—				1,084.7
Goodwill			23.5				303.9				324.2				—				651.6
Investments in subsidiaries			806.7				764.2				—				(1,570.9	)			—
Other			116.0				33.2				415.3				—				564.5
Total long-term assets			1,039.5				1,263.2				1,569.0				(1,570.9	)			2,300.8
		$	2,044.8			$	1,868.4			$	5,196.7			$	(1,570.9	)		$	7,539.0
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term borrowings		$	—			$	—			$	2.5			$	—			$	2.5
Accounts payable and drafts			79.1				525.7				1,706.2				—				2,311.0
Accrued liabilities			107.6				150.6				814.8				—				1,073.0
Total current liabilities			186.7				676.3				2,523.5				—				3,386.5
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt			695.1				—				—				—				695.1
Intercompany accounts, net			(1,782.2	)			633.8				1,148.4				—				—
Other			152.5				98.7				304.3				—				555.5
Total long-term liabilities			(934.6	)			732.5				1,452.7				—				1,250.6
EQUITY:
Lear Corporation stockholders’ equity			2,792.7				459.6				1,111.3				(1,570.9	)			2,792.7
Noncontrolling interests			—				—				109.2				—				109.2
Equity			2,792.7				459.6				1,220.5				(1,570.9	)			2,901.9
		$	2,044.8			$	1,868.4			$	5,196.7			$	(1,570.9	)		$	7,539.0