Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-22269
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrants Telephone Number)
March 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
March 31, 2011
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
|
|
|
Eaton Vance
National Municipal
Opportunities Trust
Annual Report
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed
by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of
principal invested.
Annual Report March 31, 2011
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion of Fund Performance |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance and Fund Profile |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Tax Information |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and Organization |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Important Notices |
|
|
27 |
|
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Managements Discussion of Trust Performance
Portfolio Managers Cynthia J. Clemson and Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust) is a closed-end fund traded on
the NYSE under the symbol EOT. It is designed to provide current income exempt from regular
federal income tax and invests primarily in municipal obligations that, at the time of investment,
are investment-grade quality.
Economic and Market Conditions
After beginning 2010 with 3.7% gross domestic product (GDP) growth, the U.S. economy slowed
to 1.7% in the second quarter and then began a month-by-month trudge back to daylight, ending with
fourth-quarter growth of 3.1%. Initial data suggest the economy maintained its fourth-quarter pace
into 2011. Consumer spending (about two-thirds of GDP) grew at a 4.0% rate in the fourth quarter,
the fastest since the final quarter of 2006. In 2011, however, concerns loomed that rising oil
prices could constrain consumer spending and slow the U.S. economic recovery.
During the 12-month period ending March 31, 2011, acceleration in economic growth was due in part
to massive stimulus by the Federal Reserve. The central bank, however, announced a June 2011
conclusion to its $600 billion quantitative easing program, leaving uncertainty about the economys
growth pace thereafter. There were other clouds too. U.S. unemployment, while better, was still
high at 8.8%, and there was virtually no good news in the U.S. housing market. At the same time,
the nation is facing record budget deficits, a focus, if not a preoccupation, for President Obama
and Congress as 2011 began.
For the
first five months of the period (AprilAugust 2010), the tax-exempt bond market was
generally characterized by solid performance, declining yields and moderate demand. There was,
however, growing concern about municipal credit quality. This concern was primarily triggered by
large deficits, uncertainty about pension funding and the end of federal stimulus. It was
exacerbated by significant media attention on the fiscal stress of some issuers.
In November and December of 2010, municipal bond prices declined precipitously. Initially,
municipals followed a general weakening in the U.S. Treasury market, but they continued to drop in
the wake of unprecedented outflows from retail investors, who were concerned by volatility and
high-profile predictions of municipal bond defaults. Municipal bond supply also vaulted as 2010
closed, driven by issuers that came to market ahead of the termination of the taxable municipal
Build America Bond program. The first quarter of 2011 saw a modest recovery in municipal bond
prices, as retail investors calmed and institutional cross-over investors maneuvered to take
advantage of relatively cheap yields on 5%-coupon, long-term, highly rated municipal bonds. Scant
new issue supply helped shore up the market as well. At March 31, 2011, municipal bond yields
looked attractive versus yields on U.S. Treasuries, particularly at the long end of the municipal
bond curve.
During the 12-month period, the municipal bond market posted returns that were largely positive.
Returns were higher for shorter-maturity bonds and declined as you moved up the maturity curve,
registering in negative territory for bonds with the longest maturities. The Trusts primary
benchmark, the Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index (the Index)an unmanaged index of
municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or moredeclined 1.48% for the
period.1
Management Discussion
In this difficult environment, the Trust underperformed the Index at net asset value (NAV)
for the one-year period ending March 31, 2011. Managements security selection benefited
performance. This was especially true in regard to general obligation and water and sewer bonds,
where the Trust was underweight relative to the Index but outperformed based on individual credit
selection. Overweights to hospital and industrial development revenue bonds also helped, but a
slight underexposure to the transportation sector was negative. In terms of credit quality, the
Trusts investments were concentrated
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures on page 5.
2
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Managements Discussion of Trust Performance
in the AA to BBB range, with its investment-grade bonds performing in line with those of the
Index. An allocation to non-investment-grade bonds detracted a bit, as did the Trusts slightly
longer duration profile. Also hampering performance was an overweight to zero-coupon bonds, which
offset the benefits of allocations to higher-coupon bonds. A hedge position using Treasury
futuresa strategy that management has used to help mitigate interest-rate riskproved to be the
most significant detractor from the Trusts performance as Treasury interest rates declined during
the period.
Management employed leverage in the Trust, through which additional exposure to the municipal
market was achieved. Leverage has the impact of magnifying the Trusts exposure to its underlying
investments in both up and down markets.
Clearly, many state and local governments continue to face daunting fiscal problems. Yet many, even
those with some of the most severe budget problemsIllinois, California, New York and New
Jerseyhave made real progress in bringing budgets into line through lower spending, higher taxes
or both. Tax revenues have also been on the rise in many areas as the economy slowly improves. We
will continue to monitor developments and make strategic adjustments to the portfolio as
appropriate, while maintaining a long-term perspective, which we believe will serve municipal
investors well over time.
|
|
|
|
|
% Total Return Performance 3/31/10 3/31/11 |
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Symbol |
|
EOT |
|
At NAV2 |
|
|
-2.61 |
|
At Market Price2 |
|
|
-1.60 |
|
Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index1 |
|
|
-1.48 |
|
Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) Classification at NAV1 |
|
|
-0.55 |
* |
|
See page 4 for more performance information.
* Source: Lipper.
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures on page 5.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated
by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all
distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due
to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply
and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value
will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance
may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end,
please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Performance2
|
|
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Symbol |
|
EOT |
Inception Date 5/29/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Average Annual Total Returns at NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
-2.61 |
|
Since Inception |
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Average Annual Total Returns at market price, NYSE |
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
-1.60 |
|
Since Inception |
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Premium/(Discount) to NAV (3/31/11) |
|
|
-3.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Market Yields |
|
|
|
|
|
Market Yield3 |
|
|
6.66 |
|
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield4 |
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% RIB Leverage5 |
|
|
13.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative Performance (3/31/10 3/31/11)1 |
|
% Return |
|
Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index |
|
|
-1.48 |
* |
Lipper General Municipal Debt |
|
|
|
|
Funds (Leveraged) Classification at NAV |
|
|
-0.55 |
* |
|
* Source: Lipper.
Fund Profile
Rating Distribution6 (% of total investments)
The rating distribution bar chart includes the
ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles
in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements. Absent such
securities, the Trusts rating distribution as of
3/31/11 is as follows (in %):6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
BB |
|
|
2.2 |
|
AA |
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
A |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
CCC |
|
|
1.3 |
|
BBB |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
Not Rated |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures on page 5.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated
by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all
distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due
to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply
and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value
will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance
may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end,
please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures
1. |
|
It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification.
Total returns shown for an Index do not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an
investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in an Index. The Barclays
Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the
U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more. The Lipper total return is the average total return,
at NAV, of funds that are in the Trusts Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may
include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. Index and
Lipper returns are available as of month end only. |
|
2. |
|
Performance reflects the effects of leverage. |
|
3. |
|
Trust market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common
share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. |
|
4. |
|
Taxable-equivalent figure assumes maximum federal income tax rate. A lower income tax
rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. The maximum federal income tax rate was
35% as of 3/31/11. |
|
5. |
|
The Trust employs leverage through the use of residual interest bond (RIB) financing.
Leverage provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special
risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of NAV and market price of common
shares). See Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held in Note 1 to the
financial statements for more information on RIB investments. RIB leverage represents the
amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/11 as a percentage of Trust net assets
plus Floating Rate Notes. |
|
6. |
|
Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of Trust issues
by its total investments. Ratings are based on Moodys, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit
ratings are based largely on the rating agencys investment analysis at the time of rating and
the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuers
current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not
necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a securitys market value or of the
liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating
agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of portfolio management and are current only
through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to
change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any
responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and,
because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an
indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in
the report may not be representative of the Trusts current or future investments and may change
due to active management.
5
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Investments 113.8%
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cogeneration 1.1%
|
|
Maryland Energy Financing Administration, (AES Warrior
Run), (AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,499,730
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Resource
Recovery-Colver), (AMT), 5.125%, 12/1/15
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,876,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,375,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education 10.4%
|
|
Maine Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Bowdoin College),
5.00%, 7/1/39(1)
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
$
|
10,169,499
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority,
(Dartmouth College),
5.25%, 6/1/39(1)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,234,600
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School),
5.75%, 7/1/33
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,553,625
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (The New School),
5.75%, 7/1/50
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,915,580
|
|
|
|
Oregon Facilities Authority, (Lewis & Clark College),
5.625%, 10/1/36
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
1,086,338
|
|
|
|
University of Virginia,
5.00%, 6/1/40(2)
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
2,685,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,645,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
Utilities 8.9%
|
|
Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric),
5.875%, 1/1/34
|
|
$
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
3,762,968
|
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric),
5.875%, 2/15/34
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
2,902,124
|
|
|
|
Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric
Co.), 6.50%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
|
|
2,529,891
|
|
|
|
Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (Central
Power and Light Co.), 6.30%, 11/1/29
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
6,205,260
|
|
|
|
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson
Electric Power Co.), 5.25%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,165,100
|
|
|
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power
District, AZ,
5.00%, 1/1/38(1)
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
8,849,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,414,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Obligations 2.0%
|
|
California, 6.00%, 4/1/38
|
|
$
|
5,750
|
|
|
$
|
5,883,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,883,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care
Miscellaneous 3.1%
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Community Hospital Group, Inc.), 5.75%, 10/1/31
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,096,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,096,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital 21.2%
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/34
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
984,949
|
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,001,820
|
|
|
|
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.,
(Texas Childrens Hospital),
5.50%, 10/1/39(1)
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
12,160,395
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Provena Healthcare),
7.75%, 8/15/34
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,212,880
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center),
6.625%, 11/1/39
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,579,835
|
|
|
|
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities
Board, (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6.00%, 7/1/38
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
1,513,935
|
|
|
|
Kansas Development Finance Authority, (Adventist Health
System), 5.75%, 11/15/38
|
|
|
5,915
|
|
|
|
6,096,886
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
3,385,856
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Tufts Medical
Center),
6.75%, 1/1/36(3)
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1,166,480
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Jordan Hospital), 6.75%, 10/1/33
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
3,402,936
|
|
|
|
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System),
5.25%, 11/15/46
|
|
|
7,395
|
|
|
|
6,107,457
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Kennedy
Health System), 5.625%, 7/1/31
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,539,433
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (NYU Hospital Center),
5.625%, 7/1/37
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
962,130
|
|
|
|
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District, (South Lake Hospital),
6.25%, 4/1/39
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1,294,389
|
|
|
|
St. Paul, MN, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (Health East
Project), 6.00%, 11/15/35
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,162,412
|
|
|
|
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational and Facilities Board,
(Wellmont Health System), Variable Rate,
5.44%, 9/1/32(4)
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
1,163,750
|
|
|
|
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational and Facilities Board,
(Wellmont Health System), 5.25%, 9/1/36
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,609,082
|
|
|
|
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.,
(Scott & White Healthcare), 5.25%, 8/15/40
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,349,033
|
|
|
|
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (East Texas
Medical Center), 5.375%, 11/1/37
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
3,636,585
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wheaton
Franciscan Healthcare System), 5.125%, 8/15/30
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,322,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,652,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
6
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing 4.1%
|
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, Department of
Housing and Community Development, (AMT),
5.15%, 9/1/42(1)
|
|
$
|
11,205
|
|
|
$
|
10,451,912
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (GNMA), (FHLMC), (FNMA),
5.90%, 9/1/36
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,796,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,248,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development
Revenue 22.2%
|
|
Alabama Industrial Development Authority, (Pine City Fiber Co.),
(AMT), 6.45%, 12/1/23
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,693,900
|
|
|
|
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, (Dow Chemical
Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,920,680
|
|
|
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Waste
Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.125%, 11/1/23
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,970,000
|
|
|
|
Campbell County, WY, Solid Waste Facilities, (Basin Electric
Power Cooperative), 5.75%, 7/15/39
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,087,300
|
|
|
|
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority, (Delta Airlines,
Inc.), 8.75%, 6/1/29
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
3,764,428
|
|
|
|
Effingham County, GA, Solid Waste Disposal, (Fort James
Project), (AMT), 5.625%, 7/1/18
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
229,625
|
|
|
|
Goochland County, VA, Industrial Development Authority, (Nekoosa
Packaging Corp.), (AMT), 5.65%, 12/1/25
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
134,232
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (International Paper
Co.), (AMT), 6.10%, 8/1/24
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,758,607
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (Valero Energy Corp.),
(AMT), 6.65%, 4/1/32
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,620
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX, Airport System, (Continental Airlines), (AMT),
6.75%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,416,070
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Navistar International Corp.),
6.50%, 10/15/40
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
1,513,167
|
|
|
|
Indiana Financing Authority, (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.),
6.00%, 8/1/39
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
9,266,490
|
|
|
|
Nevada Department of Business and Industry, (Republic Services,
Inc.), (AMT), 5.625% to 6/1/18 (Put Date), 12/1/26
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,901,340
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental
Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,736,960
|
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.),
5.25%, 10/1/35(5)
|
|
|
3,070
|
|
|
|
2,975,413
|
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines,
Inc. JFK International Airport), (AMT),
7.75%, 8/1/31
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
5,651,912
|
|
|
|
Owen County, KY, (American Water Project), 6.25%, 6/1/39
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,051,420
|
|
|
|
Richland County, SC, (International Paper Co.), (AMT),
6.10%, 4/1/23
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
380,897
|
|
|
|
Sabine River Authority, LA, (International Paper Co.),
6.20%, 2/1/25
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
205,308
|
|
|
|
Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board, (International Paper
Co.), 5.80%, 5/1/34
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
840,361
|
|
|
|
St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.),
5.125%, 6/1/37
|
|
|
6,240
|
|
|
|
5,746,728
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands, (HOVENSA, LLC), (AMT), 6.50%, 7/1/21
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,599,272
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA Refinery),
(AMT), 6.125%, 7/1/22
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
320,331
|
|
|
|
West Virginia Economic Development Authority, (Appalachian Power
Co.), 5.375%, 12/1/38
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,311,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,476,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Industrial
Development Revenue 0.6%
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New
Jersey-American
Water Co, Inc.), (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.375%, 5/1/32
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,628,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,628,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 1.1%
|
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., NY, (NPFG),
4.50%, 2/15/47
|
|
$
|
4,205
|
|
|
$
|
3,113,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,113,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Special Tax
Revenue 4.4%
|
|
Hesperia, CA, Community Redevelopment Agency, (XLCA),
5.00%, 9/1/25
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
175,976
|
|
|
|
Hesperia, CA, Public Financing Authority, (Redevelopment and
Housing Projects), (XLCA), 5.00%, 9/1/37
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
186,765
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities,
(AGC), 6.875%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/34
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
2,464,520
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities,
(AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
3,655,320
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC),
0.00%, 8/1/54
|
|
|
131,535
|
|
|
|
6,533,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,015,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured
Transportation 6.8%
|
|
Clark County, NV, (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport),
(AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/39
|
|
$
|
2,885
|
|
|
$
|
2,665,567
|
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/30
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
786,000
|
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/32
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
80,195
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System),
(AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/35
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
902,120
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
7
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured
Transportation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System),
(AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/36
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,132,000
|
|
|
|
San Joaquin Hills, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, Toll Road
Bonds, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/32
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1,556,800
|
|
|
|
San Jose, CA, Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT),
6.00%, 3/1/47
|
|
|
7,850
|
|
|
|
7,877,396
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/34
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
819,795
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/35
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
294,155
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/37
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
685,022
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/42
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
1,387,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,186,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 0.7%
|
|
Mohave County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mohave
Prison LLC), 8.00%, 5/1/25
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,185,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,185,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue 4.2%
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.00%, 7/15/30
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
493,547
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.25%, 7/15/40
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
558,406
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.375%, 7/15/43
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
310,927
|
|
|
|
California County, CA, Tobacco Securitization Agency,
0.00%, 6/1/46
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
|
257,187
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.30%, (0.00%
until 12/1/12), 6/1/37
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
2,535,732
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.75%, 6/1/47
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
|
|
4,134,301
|
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.00%, 6/1/48
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
1,061,861
|
|
|
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue,
5.00%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,639,480
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue,
5.25%, 9/1/26
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,392,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,383,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life
Care 2.3%
|
|
Bexar County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (Army
Retirement Residence Foundation Project), 6.20%, 7/1/45
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,907,240
|
|
|
|
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority No. 2, (Immanuel
Obligated Group), 5.50%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
454,328
|
|
|
|
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority No. 2, (Immanuel
Obligated Group), 5.625%, 1/1/40
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
877,659
|
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Charlestown Community, Inc.), 6.125%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
466,071
|
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(King Farm Presbyterian Community), 5.00%, 1/1/17
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
235,650
|
|
|
|
Mount Vernon, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Wartburg
Senior Housing, Inc.), 6.20%, 6/1/29
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
857,920
|
|
|
|
Washington Housing Finance Commission, (Wesley Homes),
6.20%, 1/1/36
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,131,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,930,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax
Revenue 3.3%
|
|
Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,543,002
|
|
|
|
Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
2,859,336
|
|
|
|
Heritage Harbor South, FL, Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 6.50%, 5/1/34
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
2,832,406
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
796,569
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
1,666,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,697,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan 2.0%
|
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, 6.00%, 1/1/28
|
|
$
|
5,740
|
|
|
$
|
5,934,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,934,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation 8.4%
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, Toll Bridge Revenue,
(San Francisco Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/34
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
1,322,398
|
|
|
|
Memphis-Shelby County, TN, Airport Authority, (AMT),
5.75%, 7/1/24
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
355,355
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport),
5.00%, 10/1/41
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,194,525
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority,
(Transportation System), 0.00%, 12/15/38
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
4,592,400
|
|
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/38
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,652,100
|
|
|
|
Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority,
5.00%, 7/1/35
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1,038,758
|
|
|
|
Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority,
5.00%, 7/1/40
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
1,206,119
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, MO, (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport),
6.625%, 7/1/34
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,065,800
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
8
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (LBJ
Express Managed Lanes Project), 7.00%, 6/30/34
|
|
$
|
2,625
|
|
|
$
|
2,698,290
|
|
|
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North
Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project), 6.875%, 12/31/39
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,557,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,682,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water and
Sewer 7.0%
|
|
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Revenue,
6.25%, 11/1/34
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,153,180
|
|
|
|
Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/34
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
509,872
|
|
|
|
Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,219,384
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California,
5.00%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,090,750
|
|
|
|
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and
Sewer System),
5.25%, 6/15/40(1)
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
|
|
11,733,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,706,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt
Investments 113.8%
|
|
|
(identified cost $332,164,403)
|
|
$
|
336,260,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, Less
Liabilities (13.8)%
|
|
$
|
(40,765,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets 100.0%
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the
Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
|
|
|
AGC
|
|
- Assured Guaranty Corp.
|
AGM
|
|
- Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
|
AMBAC
|
|
- AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
|
AMT
|
|
- Interest earned from these securities may be considered a
tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative
Minimum Tax.
|
BHAC
|
|
- Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
|
FGIC
|
|
- Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
|
FHLMC
|
|
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
|
FNMA
|
|
- Federal National Mortgage Association
|
GNMA
|
|
- Government National Mortgage Association
|
NPFG
|
|
- National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
|
XLCA
|
|
- XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
|
At March 31, 2011, the concentration of the Trusts
investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of
total investments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
14.1%
|
|
California
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
Others, representing less than 10% individually
|
|
|
73.6%
|
|
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by
municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt
securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic
developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order
to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments,
at March 31, 2011, 11.3% of total investments are backed by bond
insurance of various financial institutions and financial
guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by
an individual financial institution ranged from 0.1% to 5.2% of
total investments.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse
floater (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) |
|
Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin
requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(3) |
|
When-issued security. |
|
(4) |
|
Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the
rate in effect at March 31, 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover
payable for when-issued securities. |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
9
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $332,164,403)
|
|
$
|
336,260,111
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
5,576,372
|
|
|
|
Receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
9,132
|
|
|
|
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures
contracts
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
341,862,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued
|
|
$
|
44,430,000
|
|
|
|
Payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
1,153,781
|
|
|
|
Due to custodian
|
|
|
398,355
|
|
|
|
Payable to affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment adviser and administration fee
|
|
|
175,835
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
94,473
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
114,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
46,366,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets
|
|
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares
authorized
|
|
$
|
152,944
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
291,528,050
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss
|
|
|
(596,669
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
396,072
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
4,014,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
15,294,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
Net assets
¸
common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
$
|
19.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
10
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
22,470,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
22,470,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Investment adviser and administration fee
|
|
$
|
2,204,966
|
|
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
Custodian fee
|
|
|
152,020
|
|
|
|
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees
|
|
|
21,018
|
|
|
|
Legal and accounting services
|
|
|
56,585
|
|
|
|
Printing and postage
|
|
|
34,916
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees
|
|
|
404,012
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
121,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
3,008,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of custodian fee
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense reductions
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
$
|
3,007,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
19,462,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment transactions
|
|
$
|
924,521
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(1,977,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
$
|
(1,052,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
(26,610,903
|
)
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(123,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
$
|
(26,734,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized loss
|
|
$
|
(27,787,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
(8,324,747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
11
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
in Net Assets
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31,
2010(1)
|
|
|
|
From operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
19,462,831
|
|
|
$
|
15,229,705
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions and
financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(1,052,830
|
)
|
|
|
2,431,601
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments and financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(26,734,748
|
)
|
|
|
30,749,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
(8,324,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,410,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(18,952,894
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,206,383
|
)
|
|
|
From net realized gain
|
|
|
(1,913,334
|
)
|
|
|
(1,199,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders
|
|
$
|
(20,866,228
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,405,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
291,357,779
|
(2)
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions
|
|
|
357,915
|
|
|
|
347,667
|
|
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(482,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
$
|
357,915
|
|
|
$
|
291,223,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
$
|
(28,833,060
|
)
|
|
$
|
324,228,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
At beginning of period
|
|
$
|
324,328,154
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
$
|
324,328,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net
investment income
included in net assets
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
396,072
|
|
|
$
|
727,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the period from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to
March 31, 2010. |
(2) |
|
Proceeds from sale of shares are net of sales load paid of
$13,728,901. |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
12
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Operating Activities
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
(8,324,747
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments purchased
|
|
|
(36,869,127
|
)
|
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
46,508,049
|
|
|
|
Decrease in short-term investments, net
|
|
|
463,649
|
|
|
|
Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)
|
|
|
(3,816,044
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
|
|
160,477
|
|
|
|
Decrease in receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
1,227,697
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivable for variation margin on open financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
(16,406
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
(1,796,110
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for variation margin on open financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
(70,312
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in payable to affiliate for investment adviser and
administration fee
|
|
|
(13,636
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
(13,896
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(16,018
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from
investments
|
|
|
26,610,903
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain from investments
|
|
|
(924,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
23,109,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
Distributions paid, net of reinvestments
|
|
$
|
(20,508,313
|
)
|
|
|
Repayment of secured borrowings
|
|
|
(3,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in due to custodian
|
|
|
398,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(23,109,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions
|
|
$
|
357,915
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest and fees
|
|
|
417,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
13
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31,
2010(1)
|
|
|
|
Net asset value Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
21.230
|
|
|
$
|
19.100
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Operations
|
|
Net investment
income(3)
|
|
$
|
1.273
|
|
|
$
|
1.007
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(1.818
|
)
|
|
|
2.164
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
(0.545
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(1.240
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.930
|
)
|
|
|
From net realized gain
|
|
|
(0.125
|
)
|
|
|
(0.079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions
|
|
$
|
(1.365
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs charged to paid-in
capital(3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value End of period
|
|
$
|
19.320
|
|
|
$
|
21.230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value End of period
|
|
$
|
18.630
|
|
|
$
|
20.260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Net Asset
Value(4)
|
|
|
(2.61
|
)%
|
|
|
16.96
|
%(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Market
Value(4)
|
|
|
(1.60
|
)%
|
|
|
11.62
|
%(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)
|
|
$
|
295,495
|
|
|
$
|
324,328
|
|
|
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses excluding interest and
fees(7)
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Interest and fee
expense(9)
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Total
expenses(7)
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
|
|
5.84
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Portfolio Turnover
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the period from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to
March 31, 2010. |
(2) |
|
Net asset value at beginning of period reflects the deduction of
the sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder from
the $20.00 offering price. |
(3) |
|
Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(4) |
|
Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the
percentage change in net asset value or market value with all
distributions reinvested. |
(5) |
|
Not annualized. |
(6) |
|
Total investment return on net asset value is calculated
assuming a purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the
sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the
first day and a sale at the net asset value on the last day of
the period reported with all distributions reinvested. Total
investment return on market value is calculated assuming a
purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the sales load of
$0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the first day and a
sale at the current market price on the last day of the period
reported with all distributions reinvested. |
(7) |
|
Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than
0.005%. |
(8) |
|
Annualized. |
(9) |
|
Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating
rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities
transactions (see Note 1I). |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
14
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements
1 Significant
Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust)
is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a
diversified, closed-end management investment company. The
Trusts primary investment objective is to provide current
income exempt from federal income tax. The Trust will, as a
secondary investment objective, seek to achieve capital
appreciation.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of
the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment
Valuation Debt obligations (including
short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than
sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations
provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such
services pricing models. Inputs to the models may include,
but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and
asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of
securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or
information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and
economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach,
which considers information regarding securities with similar
characteristics to determine the valuation for a security.
Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of
sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which
approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are
valued at the closing settlement price established by the board
of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Investments for
which valuations or market quotations are not readily available
or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods
determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees
of the Trust in a manner that most fairly reflects the
securitys value, or the amount that the Trust might
reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current
sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on
a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to
vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may
include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the
existence of any contractual restrictions on the securitys
disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar
securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations
or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other
market participants, information obtained from the issuer,
analysts,
and/or the
appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an
analysis of the entitys financial condition, and an
evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the
market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and
Related Income Investment transactions for
financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date
basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are
determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is
recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for
amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal
Taxes The Trusts policy is to comply
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders
each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and
tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all
of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for
federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to
satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate
distributions from the interest income generated by its
investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from
regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as
exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any,
earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7,
1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At March 31, 2011, the Trust had a net capital loss of
$1,680,954 attributable to security transactions incurred after
October 31, 2010. This net capital loss is treated as
arising on the first day of the Trusts taxable year ending
March 31, 2012.
As of March 31, 2011, the Trust had no uncertain tax
positions that would require financial statement recognition,
de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Trusts federal
tax returns filed since the start of business on May 29,
2009 to March 31, 2011 remains subject to examination by
the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expense
Reduction State Street Bank and
Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Trust.
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced
by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash
balance the Trust maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if
any, used to reduce the Trusts custodian fees are reported
as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
E Organization and Offering
Costs Costs incurred by the Trust in
connection with its organization are expensed. Costs incurred by
the Trust in connection with the offering of its common shares
are recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.
F Legal
Fees Legal fees and other related expenses
incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of
capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the
restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment
are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect
or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
G Use of
Estimates The preparation of the financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
H Indemnifications
Under the Trusts organizational documents, its officers
and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and
expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the
Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail,
shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the
Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the
obligations of the Trust. However, the Trusts Declaration
of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part
of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust
shall assume the defense on behalf of
15
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
any Trust shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for
indemnification out of Trust property of any shareholder held
personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a
shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability.
Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters
into agreements with service providers that may contain
indemnification clauses. The Trusts maximum exposure under
these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future
claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet
occurred.
I Floating Rate
Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities
Held The Trust may invest in inverse floating
rate securities, also referred to as residual interest bonds,
whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate bond to a
broker for cash. At the same time, the Trust buys a residual
interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose
Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust),
set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating
rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a bond
into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the
broker by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not
required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond).
The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes)
which are sold to third-parties. The Inverse Floater held by the
Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of
the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par,
and (2) to have the broker transfer the Bond held by the
SPV to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Trust
exercise such right, it would generally pay the broker the par
amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse
Floater for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted
accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial
assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Trust accounts for
the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by
including the Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the
Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption
Payable for floating rate notes issued in its
Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes
have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their
holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for
redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related
to the Trusts liability with respect to Floating Rate
Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the
Trust, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of
certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement,
such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying
Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the
underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes
that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the
market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the
liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided
for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At March 31,
2011, the amount of the Trusts Floating Rate Notes
outstanding and the related collateral were $44,430,000 and
$65,599,559, respectively. The range of interest rates on
Floating Rate Notes outstanding at March 31, 2011 was 0.25%
to 0.31%. For the year ended March 31, 2011, the
Trusts average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the
average interest rate including fees were $46,846,438 and 0.86%,
respectively.
The Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements
with the broker by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the
broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the
liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the
liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any
shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls
as of March 31, 2011.
The Trust may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a
secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying
bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as
secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to
Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market transaction are
disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The Trusts
investment policies and restrictions expressly permit
investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate
securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding
the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit
quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the
market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate
environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate
bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and
income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more
volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trusts
investment policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money
except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that
the Trusts restrictions on borrowing money and issuing
senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not
apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a
liability in the Trusts Statement of Assets and
Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating
Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior
securities to which the Trusts restrictions apply. Inverse
Floaters held by the Trust are securities exempt from
registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
J Financial Futures
Contracts The Trust may enter into financial
futures contracts. Upon entering into a financial futures
contract, the Trust is required to deposit with the broker,
either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain
percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent
payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the
Trust each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in
the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as
unrealized gains or losses by the Trust. Gains (losses) are
realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures
contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the
Trust may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial
futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have
minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the
clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the
counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
K When-Issued Securities and
Delayed Delivery Transactions The Trust may
purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued
basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary
settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction
is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered
is fixed. The Trust maintains security positions for these
commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available
to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a
delayed delivery or when-issued basis are
marked-to-market
daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may
arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying
securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the
contract.
L Statement of Cash
Flows The cash amount shown in the Statement
of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the
Trusts Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents
the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any
short-term investments.
16
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
2 Distributions
to Shareholders
The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net
investment income to shareholders. In addition, at least
annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially
all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available
capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any).
Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Trust
distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a
financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America require that only
distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be
reported in the financial statements as a return of capital.
Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating
to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax
purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are
considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the year ended
March 31, 2011 and the period ended March 31, 2010 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31,
2010(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
18,867,664
|
|
|
$
|
14,196,534
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income
|
|
$
|
1,772,833
|
|
|
$
|
1,094,560
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital gains
|
|
$
|
225,731
|
|
|
$
|
114,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the period from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to
March 31, 2010. |
During the year ended March 31, 2011, accumulated net
realized loss was decreased by $841,690 and accumulated
undistributed net investment income was decreased by $841,690
due to dividend redesignations and differences between book and
tax accounting, primarily for accretion of market discount.
These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net
asset value per share of the Trust.
As of March 31, 2011, the components of distributable
earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
396,072
|
|
|
|
Post October losses
|
|
$
|
(1,680,954
|
)
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
5,098,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The differences between components of distributable earnings
(accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to
futures contracts, accretion of market discount and inverse
floaters.
3 Investment
Adviser and Administration Fee and Other Transactions with
Affiliates
The investment adviser and administration fee is earned by EVM
as compensation for investment advisory and administrative
services rendered to the Trust. The fee is computed at an annual
rate of 0.60% of the Trusts average daily gross assets up
to $1.5 billion and 0.59% of average daily gross assets of
$1.5 billion or more, and is payable monthly. Average daily
gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness
for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the
Trust. Average daily gross assets are calculated by adding to
net assets the amount payable by the Trust to floating rate note
holders. For the year ended March 31, 2011, the investment
adviser and administration fee incurred by the Trust and the
effective annual rate, as a percentage of average daily gross
assets, were $2,204,966 and 0.60%, respectively.
Except for Trustees of the Trust who are not members of
EVMs organization, officers and Trustees receive
remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the
investment adviser and administration fee. Trustees of the Trust
who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to
defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in
accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation
Plan. For the year ended March 31, 2011, no significant
amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the
Trust are officers of EVM.
4 Purchases
and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term
obligations, aggregated $36,869,127 and $46,508,049,
respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2011.
17
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
5 Shares
of Beneficial Interest
The Trust may issue common shares pursuant to its dividend
reinvestment plan. Transactions in common shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31,
2010(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,254,334
|
|
|
|
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of
distributions in Trust shares
|
|
|
16,822
|
|
|
|
18,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
|
|
|
16,822
|
|
|
|
15,272,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the period from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to
March 31, 2010. |
6 Federal
Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments of the Trust at March 31, 2011, as determined
on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost
|
|
$
|
286,731,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
14,131,669
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(9,032,687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
5,098,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Overdraft
Advances
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT may, in its
discretion, advance funds to the Trust to make properly
authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft,
the Trust is obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of
interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, a rate
above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on
demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on the Trusts assets to
the extent of any overdraft. At March 31, 2011, the Trust
had a payment due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement
of $398,355.
8 Financial
Instruments
The Trust may trade in financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities.
These financial instruments may include financial futures
contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk
in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement
purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these
instruments represent the investment the Trust has in particular
classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily
represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The
measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is
meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are
considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at
March 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Position
|
|
Aggregate Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
6/11
|
|
175 U.S.
10-Year
Treasury Note
|
|
Short
|
|
$
|
(20,805,247
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,830,469
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,222
|
)
|
|
|
6/11
|
|
270 U.S.
30-Year
Treasury Bond
|
|
Short
|
|
|
(32,394,836
|
)
|
|
|
(32,450,625
|
)
|
|
|
(55,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the Trust had sufficient cash
and/or
securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Trust is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course
of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Trust holds
fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if
interest rates rise. The Trust purchases and sells U.S. Treasury
futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
18
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be
hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and
whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at
March 31, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Asset Derivative
|
|
Liability Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
Futures
Contracts(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures
contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current
days variation margin on open futures contracts is
reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as
Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be
hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the
Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk
exposure is interest rate risk for the year ended March 31,
2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Change in Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivatives Recognized
|
|
Appreciation (Depreciation) on
|
|
|
|
|
in
Income(1)
|
|
Derivatives Recognized in
Income(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
(1,977,351
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain
(loss) Financial futures contracts. |
(2) |
|
Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) Financial futures
contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding
during the year ended March 31, 2011, which is indicative
of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately
$18,000,000.
9 Fair
Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value
measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the
assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation
techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of
inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical investments
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including a funds own assumptions in determining the fair
value of investments)
|
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level
disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities.
At March 31, 2011, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing
the Trusts investments, which are carried at value, were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
336,260,111
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
336,260,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
336,260,111
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
336,260,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(81,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trust held no investments or other financial instruments as
of March 31, 2010 whose fair value was determined using
Level 3 inputs. At March 31, 2011, the value of
investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2,
if any, during the year then ended was not significant.
19
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Trustees and
Shareholders of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities
Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and
liabilities of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities
Trust (the Trust), including the portfolio of
investments, as of March 31, 2011, and the related
statement of operations and cash flows for the year then ended,
and the statements of changes in net assets and the financial
highlights for the year then ended and the period from the start
of business, May 29, 2009, to March 31, 2010. These
financial statements and financial highlights are the
responsibility of the Trusts management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The
Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of
March 31, 2011, by correspondence with the custodian and
brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we
performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance National
Municipal Opportunities Trust as of March 31, 2011, the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then
ended, and the changes in its net assets and financial
highlights for the year then ended and the period from the start
of business, May 29, 2010 to March 31, 2010, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
May 13, 2011
20
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Federal
Tax Information (Unaudited)
The
Form 1099-DIV
you receive in January 2012 will show the tax status of all
distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2011.
Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with
respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the
Trust. As required by the Internal Revenue Code
and/or
regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days
of the Trusts fiscal year end regarding exempt-interest
dividends and capital gains dividends.
Exempt-Interest Dividends. The Trust designates
99.54% of dividends from net investment income as an
exempt-interest dividend.
Capital Gains Dividends. The Trust designates
$226,358 as a capital gain dividend.
21
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Annual
Meeting of Shareholders
The Trust held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on
January 21, 2011. The following action was taken by the
shareholders:
Item 1: The election of William H. Park and
Ronald A. Pearlman as Class II Trustees of the Trust for a
three-year term expiring in 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee for Trustee
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Elected by All Shareholders
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Park
|
|
|
14,322,606
|
|
|
|
232,813
|
|
|
|
Ronald A. Pearlman
|
|
|
14,313,305
|
|
|
|
242,114
|
|
|
|
22
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
The Trust offers a dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan)
pursuant to which shareholders automatically have distributions
reinvested in common shares (the Shares) of the Trust
unless they elect otherwise through their investment dealer.
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (AST), the
Trusts Transfer Agent, serves as agent for the
shareholders in administering the Plan (Plan Agent). On the
distribution payment date, if the net asset value per Share is
equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated
brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The
number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the net
asset value per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise,
Shares generally will be purchased on the open market by the
Plan Agent. Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are
taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.
If your Shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or
other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in
the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan,
you will need to request that your Shares be re-registered in
your name with AST or you will not be able to participate.
The Plan Agents service fee for handling distributions
will be paid by the Trust. Each participant will be charged
their pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market
purchases.
Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by
writing to the Plan Agent at the address noted on the following
page. If you withdraw, you will receive shares in your name for
all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a
participant elects by written notice to the Plan Agent to have
the Plan Agent sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit
the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee
plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
If you wish to participate in the Plan and your Shares are held
in your own name, you may complete the form on the following
page and deliver it to the Plan Agent.
Any inquiries regarding the Plan can be directed to the Plan
Agent at 1-866-439-6787.
23
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Application
for Participation in Dividend Reinvestment Plan
This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in
their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a
brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your
nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your
behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your
brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on
your behalf, you should request that your common shares be
re-registered in your own name which will enable your
participation in the Plan.
The following authorization and appointment is given with the
understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating
my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and
conditions of the Plan.
Please print exact name on account
Shareholder
signature
Date
Shareholder
signature
Date
Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All
persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.
YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE
YOUR DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.
This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the
following address:
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
c/o American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
P.O. Box 922
Wall Street Station
New York, NY
10269-0560
Number of
Employees
The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,
as a closed-end management investment company and has no
employees.
Number of
Shareholders
As of March 31, 2011, Trust records indicate that there are
8 registered shareholders and approximately 8,247 shareholders
owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers,
banks, and financial intermediaries.
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust
reports directly, which contain important information about the
Trust, please write or call:
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-262-1122
New York Stock
Exchange Symbol
The New York Stock Exchange symbol is EOT.
24
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Management
and Organization
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust) are
responsible for the overall management and supervision of the
Trusts affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are
listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the
office shown or other offices in the same company for the last
five years. The Noninterested Trustees consist of
those Trustees who are not interested persons of the
Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business
address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, EVC
refers to Eaton Vance Corp., EV refers to Eaton
Vance, Inc., EVM refers to Eaton Vance Management,
BMR refers to Boston Management and Research and
EVD refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and
EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM
and BMR. EVD is the Trusts principal underwriter and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of EVM. Each officer affiliated with
Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance
affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM
listed below. After his or her initial term, each Trustee serves
for a three year term. Each officer serves until his or her
successor is elected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Term of Office;
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
|
Trust
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience
|
|
|
|
Interested Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
1958
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director
and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of
EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee
and/or
officer of 177 registered investment companies and 1 private
investment company managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an
interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD,
EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust.
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
Director of EVC.
|
|
Noninterested
Trustees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty
1963
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration
and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of
Business Administration.
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen R. Freedman
1940
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Private Investor and Consultant. Former Chairman
(2002-2004)
and a Director
(1983-2004)
of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of
software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring
Ward International (fund distributor)
(2005-2007).
Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc.
(provider of enterprise management software to the power
generating industry)
(2005-2007).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor
Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Park
1947
|
|
Class II Trustee
|
|
Until 2014. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (an investment
management firm) (since 2010). Formerly, Vice Chairman,
Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company)
(2006-2010).
Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital
Management, LLC (investment management firm)
(2002-2005).
Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment
management firm)
(1982-2001).
Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now
PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public
accounting firm)
(1972-1981).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald A. Pearlman
1940
|
|
Class II Trustee
|
|
Until 2014. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary
(Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury
(1983-1985).
Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S.
Congress
(1988-1990).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
25
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Management
and Organization continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Term of Office;
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
|
Trust
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience
|
|
|
Noninterested
Trustees (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helen Frame Peters
1948
|
|
Class III Trustee
|
|
Until 2012. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston
College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston
College
(2000-2002).
Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper
Investments (investment management firm)
(1998-1999).
Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income,
Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm)
(1991-1998).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
Director of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club
retailer). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and
SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds)
(2000-2009).
Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank
for banks)
(2007-2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynn A. Stout
1957
|
|
Class III Trustee
|
|
Until 2012. 3 years.
Trustee since 2009
|
|
Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since
2006) and Professor of Law
(2001-2006),
University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. Professor
Stout teaches classes in corporate law and securities regulation
and is the author of numerous academic and professional papers
on these areas.
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph F. Verni
1943
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Class III Trustee
|
|
Until 2012. 3 years. Chairman of the Board Trustee since
2009
|
|
Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment
Officer
(1982-1992),
Chief Financial Officer
(1988-1990)
and Director
(1982-1992),
New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual
Funds
(1982-1992).
Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street
Management & Research
(1992-2000).
Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds
(1992-2000).
Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC
(1998-2004)
and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp.
(2002-2006).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
Principal Officers
who are not Trustees
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Length of
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
|
Trust
|
|
Service
|
|
During Past Five Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson
1963
|
|
President
|
|
Since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payson F. Swaffield
1956
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Since 2011
|
|
Chief Income Investment Officer of EVC.
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara E. Campbell
1957
|
|
Treasurer
|
|
Since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maureen A. Gemma
1960
|
|
Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
|
|
Vice President since 2011 and Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul M. ONeil
1953
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During their respective tenures, the Trustees also served as
trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds
(which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit
Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010);
Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched
in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National
Municipal Income Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009). |
26
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2011
Privacy. The
Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial
privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has
in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to
nonpublic personal information about its customers:
|
|
|
Only such information received from you, through application
forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund
transactions will be collected. This may include information
such as name, address, social security number, tax status,
account balances and transactions.
|
|
|
None of such information about you (or former customers) will be
disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes
disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In
the normal course of servicing a customers account, Eaton
Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that
perform various required services such as transfer agents,
custodians and broker/dealers.
|
|
|
Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and
procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect
the confidentiality of such information.
|
|
|
We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time
upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review
our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the
link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.
|
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within
the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds,
Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston
Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. Our
Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who
are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a
customers account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name
of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely
that only such advisers privacy policies apply to the
customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy
disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vances
Privacy Policy, please call
1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder
Documents. The Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) permits funds to deliver only
one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy
statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with
multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box
address. This practice is often called householding
and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the
mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton
Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise. If you would
prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded,
please contact Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122,
or contact your financial adviser. Your instructions that
householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents
will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance
or your financial adviser.
Portfolio
Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its
underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of
portfolio holdings on
Form N-Q
with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal
year. The
Form N-Q
will be available on the Eaton Vance website at
www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122
or in the EDGAR database on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q
may also be reviewed and copied at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, D.C. (call
1-800-732-0330
for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy
Voting. From time to time, funds are required to
vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The
Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable)
vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures
approved by the Funds and Portfolios Boards. You may
obtain a description of these policies and procedures and
information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12-month
period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by
calling
1-800-262-1122
and by accessing the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Additional Notice to
Shareholders. The Fund may purchase shares of
its common stock in the open market when they trade at a
discount to net asset value or at other times if the Fund
determines such purchases are advisable. There can be no
assurance that the Fund will take such action or that such
purchases would reduce the discount.
Closed-End Fund
Information. The Eaton Vance closed-end funds
make certain quarterly fund performance data and information
about portfolio characteristics (such as top holdings and asset
allocation) available on the Eaton Vance website after the end
of each calendar quarter-end. Certain month-end fund performance
data for the funds, including total returns, are posted to the
website shortly after the end of each calendar month. Portfolio
holdings for the most recent calendar quarter-end are also
posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of
the quarter. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com
on the fund information pages under Individual
Investors Closed-End Funds.
27
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment
Adviser and Administrator
Eaton
Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Custodian
State
Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer
Agent
American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Fund
Offices
Two
International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide
a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling
1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrants Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit
committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Chief Financial
Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm). Previously, he served as the Vice
Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company), as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional
investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now
PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a) (d)
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the registrants
fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011 by the registrants principal accountant,
Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T), for professional services rendered for the audit of the registrants
annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
3/31/11 |
|
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
41,665 |
|
|
$ |
42,220 |
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(1) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Tax Fees(2) |
|
$ |
10,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,272 |
|
|
All Other Fees(3) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,619 |
|
|
$ |
53,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements
and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by
the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically
include fees for tax return preparation. |
|
(3) |
|
All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services
provided by the registrants principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax
services. |
(e)(1) The registrants audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the
pre-approval of services provided by the registrants principal accountant (the Pre-Approval
Policies). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee
in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the
Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services
determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures
governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit
and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval
Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must
be reviewed and ratified by the registrants audit committee at least annually. The registrants
audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of
the work of the registrants principal accountant.
(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrants audit
committee pursuant to the de minimis exception set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation
S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related,
tax, and other services) billed to the registrant by D&T for the registrants fiscal years ended
March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for
audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the same
time periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
3/31/10 |
|
3/31/11 |
|
Registrant
|
|
$ |
10,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,772 |
|
|
Eaton Vance(1)
|
|
$ |
307,760 |
|
|
$ |
253,107 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The investment adviser to the registrant, as well as any of its affiliates that
provide ongoing services to the registrant, are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. |
(h) The registrants audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrants
principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrants investment adviser and any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services
to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is
compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. William H. Park
(Chair), Helen F. Peters, Lynn A. Stout and Ralph F. Verni are the members of the registrants
audit committee.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of
this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the Fund
Policy), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Funds
investment adviser and adopted the investment advisers proxy voting policies and procedures (the
Policies) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Funds proxy voting records
from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the
event that a conflict of interest arises between the Funds shareholders and the investment
adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment
adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such
conflict until it consults with the Boards Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund
Policy. The Boards Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate
course of action.
The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a companys management to its shareholders
and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy
voting service (Agent), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to
assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and
recordkeeping and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through
the Agent. The Agent is required
to vote all proxies and/or refer them back to the investment adviser pursuant to the Policies. It
is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the recommendation of
the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to mergers and
restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers contained in
mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover measures and
other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible transactions,
except in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment adviser generally
supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment adviser may abstain from
voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy
outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on
shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of
interest between the Funds shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of
their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and
prospective corporate clients. The investment advisers personnel responsible for reviewing and
voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from
a company included on that list to the personnel of the investment adviser identified in the
Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner
inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel
will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material
conflict of interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the
investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling
1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commissions website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Cynthia J. Clemson and Thomas M. Metzold are responsible for the overall and day-to-day management
of the Trusts investments. Ms. Clemson and Mr. Metzold have been Eaton Vance portfolio managers
since 1991 and are each co-Directors of Municipal Investments and Vice Presidents of Eaton Vance
Management (EVM) and Boston Management and Research (BMR), an Eaton Vance subsidiary. This
information is provided as of the date of filing of this report.
The following table shows, as of the Funds most recent fiscal year end, the number of accounts the
portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets (in millions of
dollars) in the accounts managed within each category. The table also shows the number of accounts
with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the
total assets (in millions of dollars) in those accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Total Assets of |
|
Accounts |
|
Total Assets of |
|
|
of All |
|
All |
|
Paying a |
|
Accounts Paying a |
|
|
Accounts |
|
Accounts |
|
Performance Fee |
|
Performance Fee |
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Investment
Companies |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
2,372.6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Pooled
Investment Vehicles |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Accounts |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Thomas M. Metzold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Investment
Companies |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
6,234.7 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Pooled
Investment Vehicles |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Accounts |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by the portfolio
manager as of the Funds most recent fiscal year end.
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity |
Portfolio Manager |
|
Securities Owned in the Fund |
Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
None |
Thomas M. Metzold
|
|
None |
Potential for Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in
connection with a portfolio managers management of the Funds investments on the one hand and
investments of other accounts for which a portfolio manager is responsible on the other. For
example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time,
resources and investment opportunities among the Fund and other accounts he or she advises. In
addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions between the Fund and the
other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs
from the action taken with respect to the Fund. In some cases, another account managed by a
portfolio manager may compensate the investment adviser or sub-adviser based on the performance of
the securities held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create
additional conflicts of interest for a portfolio manager in the allocation of management time,
resources and investment opportunities. Whenever conflicts of interest arise, a portfolio manager
will endeavor to exercise his or her discretion in a manner that he or she believes is equitable to
all interested persons. EVM has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these
potential conflicts including: a code of ethics; and policies which govern the investment
advisers trading practices, including among other things the aggregation and allocation of trades
among clients, brokerage allocation, cross trades and best execution.
Compensation Structure for EVM
Compensation of EVMs portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary
components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus, and (3) annual stock-based compensation
consisting of options to purchase shares of EVCs nonvoting common stock and/or restricted shares
of EVCs nonvoting common stock. EVMs investment professionals also receive certain retirement,
insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to EVMs employees. Compensation of EVMs
investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based
compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect at or
shortly after the October 31st fiscal year end of EVC.
Method to Determine Compensation. EVM compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the
scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of
managed funds and accounts versus appropriate peer groups or benchmarks. In addition to rankings
within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given
to relative risk-adjusted performance. Risk-adjusted performance measures include, but are not
limited to, the Sharpe Ratio. Performance is normally based on periods ending on the September
30th preceding fiscal year end. Fund performance is normally evaluated primarily versus peer
groups of funds as determined by Lipper Inc. and/or Morningstar, Inc. When a funds peer group as
determined by Lipper or Morningstar is deemed by EVMs management not to provide a fair comparison,
performance may instead be evaluated primarily against a custom peer group. In evaluating the
performance of a fund and its manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on three-year
performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer and shorter periods. For
funds that are tax-managed or otherwise have an objective of after-tax returns, performance is
measured net of taxes. For other funds, performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis. For funds
with an investment objective other than total return (such as current income), consideration will
also be given to the funds success in achieving its objective. For managers responsible for
multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis, based on
averages or weighted averages among managed funds and accounts. Funds and accounts that have
performance-based advisory fees are not accorded disproportionate weightings in measuring aggregate
portfolio manager performance.
The compensation of portfolio managers with other job responsibilities (such as heading an
investment group or providing analytical support to other portfolios) will include consideration of
the scope of such responsibilities and the managers performance in meeting them.
EVM seeks to compensate portfolio managers commensurate with their responsibilities and
performance, and competitive with other firms within the investment management industry. EVM
participates in investment-industry compensation surveys and utilizes survey data as a factor in
determining salary, bonus and stock-based compensation levels for portfolio managers and other
investment professionals. Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by
the operating performance of EVM and its parent company. The overall annual cash bonus pool is
based on a substantially fixed percentage of pre-bonus operating income. While the salaries of
EVMs portfolio managers are comparatively fixed, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may
fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other
factors as described herein. For a high performing portfolio manager, cash bonuses and stock-based
compensation may represent a substantial portion of total compensation.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated
Purchasers
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrants principal executive officer and principal
financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrants current disclosure controls and
procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the
date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by
the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period
specified in the Commissions rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by
the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrants principal executive
officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting
during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
|
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
Registrants Code of Ethics. |
(a)(2)(i)
|
|
Treasurers Section 302 certification. |
(a)(2)(ii)
|
|
Presidents Section 302 certification. |
(b)
|
|
Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson
Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 13, 2011 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act
of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Barbara E. Campbell
Barbara E. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 13, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson
Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 13, 2011 |
|
|