Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-8929
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-1369354 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 300, New York,
New York
|
|
10176 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
212/297-0200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
51,577,619 shares |
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Article I. Item 1. Financial Statements
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
23,573 |
|
|
$ |
26,741 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances
of $11,907 and $12,466 at July 31, 2009 and
October 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
470,545 |
|
|
|
473,263 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
15,151 |
|
|
|
7,097 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
16,780 |
|
|
|
34,508 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
58,981 |
|
|
|
57,011 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
55,392 |
|
|
|
57,463 |
|
Insurance recoverables |
|
|
4,817 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
645,239 |
|
|
|
661,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
5,846 |
|
|
|
11,205 |
|
Insurance deposits |
|
|
42,506 |
|
|
|
42,506 |
|
Other investments and long-term receivables |
|
|
5,524 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
72,512 |
|
|
|
88,704 |
|
Insurance recoverables |
|
|
67,300 |
|
|
|
66,600 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
31,182 |
|
|
|
23,310 |
|
Investments in auction rate securities |
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
|
19,031 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $87,328 and $85,377 at
July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
59,438 |
|
|
|
61,067 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated
amortization of $40,910 and $32,571 at
July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
63,084 |
|
|
|
62,179 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
548,978 |
|
|
|
535,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,561,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,575,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
87,511 |
|
|
$ |
104,930 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
93,032 |
|
|
|
88,951 |
|
Taxes other than income |
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
|
20,270 |
|
Insurance claims |
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
84,272 |
|
Other |
|
|
78,013 |
|
|
|
76,590 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
12,316 |
|
|
|
10,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
379,514 |
|
|
|
387,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
14,369 |
|
|
|
15,793 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
196,000 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
Retirement plans and other |
|
|
37,754 |
|
|
|
37,095 |
|
Insurance claims |
|
|
259,010 |
|
|
|
261,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
886,647 |
|
|
|
931,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares
authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 51,489,797 and 57,992,072 shares issued
at July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
172,003 |
|
|
|
284,094 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(2,076 |
) |
|
|
(3,422 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
504,175 |
|
|
|
485,136 |
|
Treasury stock (7,028,500 shares at October 31, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
674,617 |
|
|
|
644,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,561,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,575,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (Note 10) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (Note 10) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
870,635 |
|
|
$ |
923,667 |
|
|
$ |
2,613,818 |
|
|
$ |
2,717,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
782,449 |
|
|
|
818,887 |
|
|
|
2,335,865 |
|
|
|
2,428,989 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
64,736 |
|
|
|
72,317 |
|
|
|
200,388 |
|
|
|
207,694 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
7,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
850,137 |
|
|
|
893,722 |
|
|
|
2,544,708 |
|
|
|
2,644,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
20,498 |
|
|
|
29,945 |
|
|
|
69,110 |
|
|
|
73,682 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
17,460 |
|
|
|
26,607 |
|
|
|
63,091 |
|
|
|
61,754 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
22,887 |
|
|
|
23,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
16,344 |
|
|
|
40,204 |
|
|
|
37,915 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
(4,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,276 |
|
|
$ |
16,412 |
|
|
$ |
39,270 |
|
|
$ |
33,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and
common equivalent shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
51,471 |
|
|
|
50,653 |
|
|
|
51,294 |
|
|
|
50,388 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
51,937 |
|
|
|
51,650 |
|
|
|
51,653 |
|
|
|
51,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.130 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.390 |
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (Note 1) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,270 |
|
|
$ |
33,850 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
(4,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
40,204 |
|
|
|
37,915 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations
to net cash provided by continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
23,871 |
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,792 |
|
|
|
8,812 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
Provision for bad debt |
|
|
3,291 |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
Discount accretion on insurance claims |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Auction rate security credit loss impairment |
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(4,705 |
) |
|
|
(39,497 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(4,383 |
) |
|
|
4,822 |
|
Insurance recoverables |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
2,200 |
|
Other assets and long-term receivables |
|
|
(3,882 |
) |
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(7,314 |
) |
|
|
2,998 |
|
Retirement plans and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(4,947 |
) |
Insurance claims payable |
|
|
(4,002 |
) |
|
|
(10,010 |
) |
Trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(16,916 |
) |
|
|
3,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
|
(6,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
|
52,636 |
|
|
|
30,950 |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities |
|
|
23,829 |
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
76,465 |
|
|
|
36,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(15,160 |
) |
|
|
(27,278 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
Purchase of businesses |
|
|
(19,863 |
) |
|
|
(421,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
|
(32,293 |
) |
|
|
(446,990 |
) |
Net cash provided by discontinued investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(32,293 |
) |
|
|
(446,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock options (including income tax benefit) |
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
12,985 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(20,007 |
) |
|
|
(18,901 |
) |
Borrowings from line of credit |
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
|
658,500 |
|
Repayment of borrowings from line of credit |
|
|
(559,000 |
) |
|
|
(373,500 |
) |
Changes
in book cash overdrafts |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(47,340 |
) |
|
|
286,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,168 |
) |
|
|
(123,123 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
|
147,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
23,573 |
|
|
$ |
24,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (Note 1) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received |
|
$ |
10,270 |
|
|
$ |
9,603 |
|
Tax effect from exercise of options |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
1,408 |
|
Cash received from exercise of options |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
11,577 |
|
Interest paid on line of credit |
|
$ |
3,869 |
|
|
$ |
10,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for business acquired |
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM,
and together with its subsidiaries, the Company) contained in this report are unaudited and
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in ABMs Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008. All references to years are to the
Companys fiscal year, which ends on October 31.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in ABMs condensed consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of
these financial statements. The current economic environment and its potential effect on the
Companys customers have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and
assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from
continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in
future periods. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements reflect all adjustments, which are normal and recurring, necessary to fairly state the
information for each period contained therein. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended July 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full
fiscal year or any future periods.
In preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company has
evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through
September 3, 2009, which is the date the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
were issued.
8
Immaterial Correction
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2008, and the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended July 31, 2008, corrects the cash
presentation related to offsetting of positive and negative book cash balances. The effects of the
corrections are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
As |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reported |
|
|
Corrected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
26,741 |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
70,034 |
|
|
$ |
104,930 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
85,455 |
|
|
$ |
76,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
As |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reported |
|
|
Corrected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
279,084 |
|
|
$ |
286,860 |
|
The correction had no impact on the Companys previously reported earnings for any period.
For the purposes of the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company
presents the change in cash book overdrafts (i.e., negative cash balances that have not been presented for
payment by the bank) within cash flows from financing activities.
2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective November 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) for financial assets and liabilities
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). The
Company has not yet adopted SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities, in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff
Position (FSP) 157-2, Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP SFAS 157-2), which defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to
November 1, 2009, for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. See Note
13, Fair Value Measurements for the required disclosures.
Effective February 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No.
161). SFAS No. 161 requires additional disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging
activities that include how and why an entity uses derivatives, how these instruments and the
related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, and related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect the entitys financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See Note
15, Line of Credit Facility for the required disclosures.
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP SFAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1).
FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require quarterly disclosures for financial instruments within the
scope of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. See Note 13, Fair
Value Measurements for the required disclosures.
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP SFAS 115-2 and 124-2). FSP SFAS 115-2 and
124-2 significantly change the existing other-than-temporary impairment model for debt securities.
It also modifies the presentation of other-than-temporary impairment losses and increase the
frequency of and expands required disclosures about other-than-temporary impairment for debt and
equity securities. See Note 14, Auction Rate Securities for additional information and the
required disclosures.
9
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP SFAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP SFAS 157-4). FSP SFAS 157-4 provides
additional guidelines for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157. See Note 13, Fair
Value Measurements for additional information.
Effective July 31, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165).
The objective of this statement is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. This
statement introduces the concept of financial statements being available to be issued. It requires
the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. See Note 1, Basis of Presentation for additional information.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159), to permit all entities to choose to elect, at specified
election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. An entity shall report
unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings
at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize upfront costs and fees related to those items in
earnings as incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 became effective for the Company as of
November 1, 2008. As the Company did not elect the fair value option for its financial instruments
(other than those already measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157), the adoption of
this standard did not have an impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. Insurance
The Company periodically evaluates its estimated claim costs and liabilities and accrues
self-insurance reserves to its best estimate three times during the fiscal year. Management also
monitors new claims and claim development to assess appropriate levels of insurance reserves. The
self-insurance reserves are intended to reflect recent experience and trends. The trend analysis is
complex and highly subjective. The interpretation of trends requires knowledge of many factors that
may or may not be reflective of adverse or favorable developments (e.g., changes in regulatory
requirements and changes in reserving methodology). Trends may also be impacted by changes in
safety programs or claims handling practices. If the trends suggest that the frequency or severity
of claims incurred has changed, the Company might be required to record increases or decreases in
expenses for self-insurance liabilities.
Actuarial evaluations (using claims data as of January 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009), covering the
majority of the Companys self-insurance reserves related to prior years and excluding the claims
acquired from OneSource Services, Inc. (OneSource), resulted in a $3.5 million increase in the
self-insurance reserves recorded in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009. The comparative
prior year actuarial evaluations (using claims data as of January 31, 2008 and May 31, 2008),
covering the majority of the Companys self-insurance reserves related to prior years and excluding
claims acquired from OneSource (the evaluation of the claims for OneSource were completed during
the three months ended October 31, 2008), resulting in a $7.6 million and a $14.8 million decrease
in the self-insurance reserves for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2008, respectively.
These adjustments have been recorded in the Corporate division for all periods presented.
The Companys reported self-insurance reserves include liabilities in excess of its self-insurance
retention limits and the Company records the corresponding receivables for amounts expected to be
recovered from the insurance provider. At July 31, 2009, there were $84.5 million and $259.0
million recorded in current and non-current insurance claims liabilities including amounts in
excess of self-insurance retention limits, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance
sheet. Additionally, insurance recoverables of $4.8 million and $67.3 million were recorded as
current and non-current insurance recoverables, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of July 31, 2009.
10
4. Net Income per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is calculated as net income divided by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is based on the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, adjusted to include the assumed
exercise and conversion of certain stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares.
The calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
12,400 |
|
|
$ |
16,344 |
|
|
$ |
40,204 |
|
|
$ |
37,915 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
(4,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,276 |
|
|
$ |
16,412 |
|
|
$ |
39,270 |
|
|
$ |
33,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding Basic |
|
|
51,471 |
|
|
|
50,653 |
|
|
|
51,294 |
|
|
|
50,388 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Performance shares |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding Diluted |
|
|
51,937 |
|
|
|
51,650 |
|
|
|
51,653 |
|
|
|
51,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
The diluted net income per common share excludes certain stock options and restricted stock units
since the effect of including these stock options and restricted stock units would have been
anti-dilutive as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
5. Share-Based Compensation Plans
Share-based compensation expense was $2.1 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended July
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $5.6 million and $5.4 million for the nine months ended July
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The share-based compensation expense is recorded in selling,
general and administrative expenses. The Company estimates its forfeiture rates based on historical
data and adjusts the expected forfeiture rates annually or as needed. During the three months
ended January 31, 2009, the Company adjusted its estimated forfeiture rate to align with expected
forfeitures and the effect of such adjustment was immaterial. No other adjustments to the
forfeiture rate were made in the nine months ended July 31, 2009.
The following grants were approved by the Companys Compensation Committee on January 12, 2009:
120,364 stock options, 184,525 restricted stock units and 119,977 performance shares, each under
the terms of the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. The Company estimates the fair
value of stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The
assumptions used in the option valuation model for the stock options granted on January 12, 2009
were: (1) expected life from date of grant of 5.7 years; (2) expected stock price volatility of
35.23%; (3) expected dividend yield of 2.49% and (4) a risk-free interest rate of 1.65%. The fair
value of options granted was $4.82 per share. No other significant share-based grants were made
under the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, during the nine months ended July 31,
2009.
11
6. Treasury Stock
On March 2, 2009, the Company retired 7,028,500 shares of treasury stock.
7. Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,276 |
|
|
$ |
16,412 |
|
|
$ |
39,270 |
|
|
$ |
33,850 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on auction rate
securities, net of taxes of $56 and $245 for the three and nine
months ended July 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
Reclass
adjustment for credit losses recognized in earnings, net of taxes of
$617 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap
agreement, net of taxes |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
Actuarial (loss) gain adjustments to pension
& other post-retirement plans, net of taxes |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
13,754 |
|
|
$ |
15,902 |
|
|
$ |
40,616 |
|
|
$ |
32,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Acquisitions
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company acquired certain assets (primarily customer contracts and
relationships) of Control Building Services, Inc., Control Engineering Services, Inc., and TTF,
Inc., for $15.1 million in cash, which includes direct acquisition costs of $0.1 million, plus
additional consideration of up to $1.6 million, payable in three equal installments of $0.5
million, contingent upon the achievement of certain revenue targets during the three year period
commencing on May 1, 2009. The acquisition closed on May 8, 2009 and was accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting. The acquisition expands ABMs janitorial and engineering service
offerings to clients in the Northeast region.
The preliminary purchase price and related allocations are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Initial payment |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash consideration |
|
$ |
15,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts and relationships |
|
$ |
9,080 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
407 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
The acquired customer contracts and relationships will be amortized using the
sum-of-the-years-digits method over their useful lives of
12 years, which is consistent with the estimated
useful life considerations used in determination of their fair values. Goodwill of $5.6 million
were assigned to the Janitorial and Engineering segments in the amounts of $4.4 million and $1.2
million, respectively. Intangible assets were assigned to the Janitorial and Engineering segments
in the amounts of $7.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Pro forma financial information for
this acquisition is not material to the Companys financial statements. The Company expects to
finalize the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired during the remainder of 2009.
12
During the three months ended January 31, 2009, the Company further adjusted goodwill related to
its acquisition of OneSource by $0.7 million for professional fees, legal reserves for litigation
that commenced prior to acquisition, additional workers compensation insurance liabilities and
certain deferred income taxes.
On November 1, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the operating assets of Sentinel
Guard Systems (Sentinel), a Los Angeles-based company, from Tracerton Enterprises, Inc. for an
initial purchase price of $5.3 million and contingent payments, based on achieving certain revenue
and profitability targets over the three-year period beginning November 1, 2005, payable in shares
of ABMs common stock. On April 1, 2009, the Company issued 55,940 shares of ABMs common stock as
part of the post-closing consideration based on the performance of Sentinel for the year ended
October 31, 2008. The value of these shares was approximately $1.2 million and has been recorded as
goodwill. The total purchase price paid to date, including contingent payments, is $7.6 million,
and there are no further contingent payments under the agreement.
Total additional consideration during the three months ended July 31, 2009 related to the
HealthCare Parking Systems of America, Inc. (HPSA) and the Security Services of America, LLC
(SSA) acquisitions was $4.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The additional consideration
represents contingent amounts based on financial performance, which has been recorded as goodwill.
The total purchase price to date for the HPSA and SSA acquisitions, including contingent payments,
were $12.9 million and $42.7 million, respectively.
9. Discontinued Operations
On October 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
former Lighting division, excluding accounts receivable and certain other assets and liabilities,
to Sylvania Lighting Services Corp (Sylvania). The remaining assets and liabilities associated
with the Lighting division have been classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued
operations for all periods presented. The results of operations of the Lighting division for all
periods presented are classified as (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes.
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of the Lighting division
included in discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
21,735 |
|
Notes receivable and other |
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
Other receivables due from Sylvania (a) |
|
|
13,046 |
|
|
|
9,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
16,780 |
|
|
|
34,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes receivable |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
Other receivables due from Sylvania (a) |
|
|
4,491 |
|
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
5,846 |
|
|
|
11,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
Due to Sylvania, net (b) |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
12,316 |
|
|
|
10,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In connection with the sale of the Lighting division, Sylvania acquired certain
contracts containing deferred charges. Payments received by Sylvania from customers with
respect to the deferred charges for these contracts are paid to the Company. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents net amounts collected on Sylvanias behalf pursuant to a transition services
agreement, which was entered into in connection with the sale of the Lighting division. |
13
The summarized operating results of the Companys discontinued Lighting division for the three
and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
25,287 |
|
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
80,382 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(1,492 |
) |
|
|
(4,540 |
) |
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
(124 |
) |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
(934 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $0.1 million and $0.9 million for the
three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, respectively, primarily relates to severance related
costs and selling, general and administrative transition costs.
10. Parking Revenue Presentation
The Companys Parking segment reports both revenues and expenses, in equal amounts, for costs
directly reimbursed from its managed parking lot clients in accordance with Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for
Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred. Parking revenues related solely to the reimbursement of expenses
totaled $57.2 million and $62.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $175.0 million and $191.7 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2008, the classification
of certain parking revenues related to the reimbursement of expenses have been reclassified from
amounts previously reported to correct their historical classification.
14
11. Segment Information
The Company was previously organized into five separate reportable operating segments. In
accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, Janitorial, Parking, Security, Engineering and Lighting were reportable segments. In
connection with the discontinued operation of the Lighting division (as discussed in Note 9,
Discontinued Operations), the operating results of Lighting are classified as discontinued
operations and, as such, are not reflected in the tables below. Segment revenues and operating
profits of the continuing reportable segments (Janitorial, Parking, Security, and Engineering) were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
595,115 |
|
|
$ |
638,508 |
|
|
$ |
1,792,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,870,096 |
|
Parking |
|
|
114,721 |
|
|
|
119,814 |
|
|
|
343,737 |
|
|
|
356,346 |
|
Security |
|
|
84,501 |
|
|
|
85,347 |
|
|
|
252,487 |
|
|
|
248,573 |
|
Engineering |
|
|
75,782 |
|
|
|
79,616 |
|
|
|
223,192 |
|
|
|
240,777 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
870,635 |
|
|
$ |
923,667 |
|
|
$ |
2,613,818 |
|
|
$ |
2,717,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
35,043 |
|
|
$ |
31,678 |
|
|
$ |
102,248 |
|
|
$ |
82,464 |
|
Parking |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
13,717 |
|
Security |
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
Engineering |
|
|
4,857 |
|
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
13,561 |
|
|
|
13,335 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(27,121 |
) |
|
|
(14,788 |
) |
|
|
(66,610 |
) |
|
|
(40,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
20,498 |
|
|
|
29,945 |
|
|
|
69,110 |
|
|
|
73,682 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
17,460 |
|
|
$ |
26,607 |
|
|
$ |
63,091 |
|
|
$ |
61,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Corporate expenses are not allocated. Such expenses include the adjustments to the
Companys self-insurance reserves relating to prior years, severance costs associated with the
integration of OneSources operations into the Janitorial segment, the Companys share-based
compensation costs, the completion of the corporate move to New York, and certain information
technology costs.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
On January 20, 2009, ABM and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), entered into a
binding Memorandum of Understanding (the MOU), pursuant to which ABM and IBM agreed to:
(1) terminate certain services then provided by IBM to ABM under the Master Professional Services
Agreement dated October 1, 2006 (the Agreement); (2) transition the terminated services to ABM
and/or its designee; (3) resolve certain other disputes arising under the Agreement; and (4) modify
certain terms applicable to services that IBM will continue to provide to ABM. In connection with
the execution of the MOU, ABM delivered to IBM a formal notice terminating for convenience certain
information technology and support services effective immediately (the Termination).
Notwithstanding the Termination, the MOU contemplated (1) that IBM would assist ABM with the
transition of the terminated services to ABM or its designee pursuant to an agreement (the
Transition Agreement) to be executed by ABM and IBM and (2) the continued provision by IBM of
certain data center services. On February 24, 2009, ABM and IBM entered into an amended and
restated agreement, which amends the Agreement (the Amended Agreement), and the Transition
Agreement, which memorializes the termination-related provisions of the MOU as well as other terms
related to the transition services. Under the Amended Agreement, the base fee for the provision of
the defined data center services is $18.8 million payable over the service term (March 2009
through December 2013) as follows: 2009 $3.6 million; 2010 $4.4 million; 2011 $4.0 million ;
2012 $3.3 million; 2013 $3.0 million; and 2014 $0.5 million.
15
In connection with the Termination, ABM has agreed to: (1) reimburse IBM for certain actual
employee severance costs, up to a maximum of $0.7 million, provided ABM extends comparable offers
of employment to a minimum number of IBM employees; (2) reimburse IBM for certain early
termination costs, as defined, including third party termination fees and/or wind down costs
totaling approximately $0.4 million associated with software, equipment and/or third party
contracts used by IBM in performing the terminated services; and (3) pay IBM fees and expenses for
requested transition assistance which are estimated to be approximately $0.4 million. Payments made
in connection with the Termination were $0.4 million during the nine months ended July 31, 2009.
Contingencies
The Company is subject to various legal and arbitration proceedings and other contingencies that
arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, the Company accrues the amount of probable and estimable losses related to such
matters. At July 31, 2009, the total amount of probable and estimable losses accrued for legal and
other contingencies was $4.9 million. However, the ultimate resolution of legal and arbitration
proceedings and other contingencies is always uncertain. If actual losses materially exceed the
estimates accrued, the Companys financial condition and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected.
In November 2008, the Company and its former third party administrator of workers compensation
claims settled a claim in arbitration for net proceeds of $9.6 million, after legal expenses,
related to poor claims management, which amount was received by the Company during January 2009.
This amount was classified as a reduction in operating expenses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended
July 31, 2009. This settlement was recorded in the Corporate
division.
13. Fair Value Measurements
SFAS No. 157 defines and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. Under SFAS No. 157, fair
value is determined based on inputs or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or a liability. These assumptions consist of (1) observable inputs market data obtained
from independent sources, or (2) unobservable inputs market data determined using the companys
own assumptions about valuation. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy to prioritize the inputs to
valuation techniques, with the highest priority being given to Level 1 inputs and the lowest
priority to Level 3 inputs, as described below:
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived
valuations in which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in
active markets; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs.
FSP SFAS 157-4 provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities under
SFAS No. 157 in the current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair
value measurement remains the determination of an exit price. If there has been a significant
decrease in the volume and level of activity of the asset or liability in relation to normal market
activities, quoted market values may not be representative of fair value and a change in valuation
technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. The adoption of FSP SFAS
157-4 did not have an impact on the fair value of the Companys financial assets and liabilities.
16
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
(in thousands) |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in deferred compensation plan (a) |
|
$ |
5,915 |
|
|
$ |
5,915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment in auction rate securities (b) |
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
25,570 |
|
|
$ |
5,915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap (c) |
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair value of the assets held in the deferred compensation plan is based on quoted
market prices. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of the investments in auction rate securities is based on discounted cash flow
valuation models, primarily utilizing unobservable inputs. See Note 14, Auction Rate Securities. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair value of the interest rate swap is estimated based on the difference between the
present value of expected cash flows calculated at the contracted interest rates and at the current
market interest rates using observable benchmarks for LIBOR forward rates at the end of the period.
See Note 15, Line of Credit Facility. |
See
Note 14 Auction Rate Securities for a reconciliation
of assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable level
3 inputs.
Other Financial Assets and Liabilities
Due to the short-term maturities of the Companys cash, cash equivalents, receivables, payables,
and current assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, the carrying value of these
financial instruments approximates their fair market values. Due to the variable interest rates,
the fair value of the outstanding borrowings under the Companys $450.0 million line of credit
approximates its carrying value of $196.0 million. The carrying value of the receivables included
in non-current assets of discontinued operations of $5.8 million approximated fair market value.
Other financial instruments of $1.4 million included in other investments and long-term receivables
have no quoted market prices and, accordingly, a reasonable estimate of fair value could not be
made without incurring excessive costs.
14. Auction Rate Securities
As of July 31, 2009, the Company held investments in auction rate securities from five
different issuers having an original principal amount of $5.0 million each
(aggregating $25.0 million). At July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the
estimated fair value of these securities, in total, was approximately $19.7 million and
$19.0 million, respectively. These auction rate securities are debt instruments with
stated maturities ranging from 2025 to 2050, for which the interest rate is designed to
be reset through Dutch auctions approximately every 30 days. However, due to events in the
U.S. credit markets, auctions for these securities began to fail commencing in August 2007 and
have continued to fail since then.
17
The Company continues to receive the scheduled interest payments from the issuers of the
securities. During the first quarter of 2009, one issuer provided a notice of default. This default
was cured on March 10, 2009 and all subsequent interest payments have been made by the issuer since
that date. The scheduled interest and principal payments of that security are guaranteed by a U.K.
financial guarantee insurance company, which made the guaranteed interest payments as scheduled
during the first quarter of 2009. At July 31, 2009, a rating agency downgraded its rating of this
issuer to below investment grade. The remaining four securities are rated investment grade by
rating agencies.
The Company estimates the fair values of auction rate securities it holds utilizing a
discounted cash flow model, which considers, among other factors, assumptions
about: (1) the underlying collateral; (2) credit risks associated with the issuer; (3)
contractual maturity; (4) credit enhancements associated with any financial insurance guarantee, if
any; and (5) assumptions about when, if ever, the security might be re-financed
by the issuer or have a successful auction (presently assumed to be approximately 4 to 8 years).
Since there can be no assurance that auctions for these securities will be
successful in the near future, the Company has classified its auction rate
securities as long-term investments.
FSP SFAS 115-2 and 124-2 has modified the factors the Company uses to determine if impairments
are other-than-temporary. The Companys determination of whether impairments of its auction rate
securities are other-than-temporary is based on an evaluation of several factors, circumstances and
known or reasonably supportable trends including, but not limited to: (1) the Companys intent to
not sell the securities; (2) the Companys assessment that it is not more likely than not that the
Company will be required to sell the securities before recovering its costs; (3) expected defaults;
(4) the decline in ratings for the auction rate securities or the underlying collateral; (5) the
rating of the associated guarantor (where applicable); (6) the nature and value of the underlying
collateral expected to service the investment; (7) actual historical performance of the security in
servicing its obligations; and (8) actuarial experience of the underlying re-insurance arrangement
(where applicable) which in certain circumstances may have preferential rights to the underlying
collateral.
Based on the Companys analysis of the above factors, the Company identified an
other-than-temporary impairment of $3.6 million for the security whose rating was recently
downgraded to below investment grade, of which a credit loss of $1.6 million was recognized in
earnings with a corresponding reduction in the cost basis of that security during the three months
ended July 31, 2009. The credit loss was based upon the difference between the present value of
the expected cash flows to be collected and its amortized cost basis. Significant assumptions used
in estimating the credit loss include: (1) default rates (which were based on published historical
default rates of similar securities and consideration of current market trends) and (2) an expected
term of 8 years (which represents the Companys view of when market efficiency for that security
may be restored). Adverse changes in any of these factors above could result in further material
declines in fair value and additional other-than-temporary impairments in the future.
The cumulative other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) related to credit losses recognized in
earnings for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
|
OTTI credit losses |
|
|
Additions for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for |
|
|
of the amount |
|
|
|
recognized for the |
|
|
the amount |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
increases in |
|
|
related to credit |
|
|
|
auction rate |
|
|
related to |
|
|
increases to the |
|
|
cash flows |
|
|
losses held at |
|
|
|
security held at the |
|
|
credit loss for |
|
|
amount related |
|
|
expected to be |
|
|
the end of the |
|
|
|
beginning of the |
|
|
which OTTI |
|
|
to credit loss for |
|
|
collected that are |
|
|
period for which |
|
|
|
period for which a |
|
|
was not |
|
|
which an OTTI |
|
|
recognized over |
|
|
a portion of OTTI |
|
|
|
portion of OTTI was |
|
|
previously |
|
|
was previously |
|
|
the remaining life |
|
|
was recognized |
|
(in thousands) |
|
recognized in OCI |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
of the security |
|
|
in OCI |
|
OTTI credit loss recognized
for auction rate security |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
As of July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, unrealized losses of $3.8 million ($2.3 million net
of tax) and $6.0 million ($3.6 million net of tax) were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
loss, respectively.
18
The following table provides the changes in the cost basis and fair value of the Companys auction
rate securities for the nine months ended July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
(Level
3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,031 |
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
Unrealized
losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
Other-than-temporary
credit loss
recognized in earnings |
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
23,434 |
|
|
$ |
19,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Line of Credit Facility
In connection with the acquisition of OneSource, ABM entered into a $450.0 million five year
syndicated line of credit that is scheduled to expire on November 14, 2012 (the Facility). The
line of credit is available for working capital, the issuance of standby letters of credit, the
financing of capital expenditures, and other general corporate purposes.
As of July 31, 2009, the total outstanding amounts under the Facility in the form of cash
borrowings and standby letters of credit were $196.0 million and $118.6 million, respectively.
Available credit under the line of credit was $135.4 million as of July 31, 2009.
The Facility includes covenants limiting liens, dispositions, fundamental changes, investments,
indebtedness and certain transactions and payments. In addition, the Facility also requires that
ABM maintain the following three financial covenants which are described in Note 5, Line of Credit
Facility, to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A: (1) a fixed charge coverage ratio; (2) a leverage ratio; and (3) a combined net
worth test. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of July 31, 2009 and expects to be
in compliance in the foreseeable future.
On February 19, 2009, the Company entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement with a
notional amount of $100.0 million, involving the exchange of floating- for fixed-rate interest
payments. The Company will receive 1 month LIBOR floating-rate interest payments that offset the
LIBOR component of the interest due on $100.0 million of the Companys floating-rate debt and make
fixed-rate interest payments of 1.47% over the life of the interest rate swap. The
Company assesses the effectiveness of the Companys hedging strategy using the method described in
Derivatives Implementation Group Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. G9, Cash Flow Hedges:
Assuming No Ineffectiveness When Critical Terms of the Hedging Instrument and the Hedged
Transaction Match in a Cash Flow Hedge. Additionally, the Company assesses the creditworthiness of
each swap counterparty to determine the possibility of whether the counterparty to the derivative
instrument will default by failing to make any contractually required payments as scheduled in the
derivative instrument. The Company also assesses whether its LIBOR-based interest payments are
probable of being paid under the loan at the inception and, on an ongoing basis (no less than once
each quarter), during the life of each hedging relationship.
As of July 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate swap was ($0.7) million, which is included
in retirement plans and other on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The effective portion
of the cash flow hedges are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheet and reclassified into interest expense, net in the Companys
condensed consolidated statements of income in the same period during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings. Any ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges are recorded immediately to
interest expense, net. No ineffectiveness existed at July 31, 2009, therefore the amount included
in accumulated other comprehensive loss was ($0.7) million ($0.4 million, net of taxes).
19
16. Income Taxes
As of July 31, 2009, the Company had $99.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $1.4
million, if recognized, would affect its effective tax rate. The remainder of the balance, if
recognized prior to the Companys planned adoption of SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS No. 141R) on November 1, 2009, would be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill
and would not impact the effective tax rate but would impact the payment of cash to the taxing
authorities. The Company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
income tax expense. As of July 31, 2009, the Company had accrued interest related to uncertain tax
positions of $0.6 million on the Companys balance sheet. During the nine months ended July 31,
2009, the unrecognized tax benefit decreased by $18.2 million due to adjustments related to certain
acquired tax positions. The Company has recorded $2.2 million of the unrecognized tax benefits as a
current liability.
The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the three and nine months ended
July 31, 2009 was 29.0% and 36.3%, respectively, compared to the 38.6% for the three and nine
months ended July 31, 2008. The effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended July 31,
2009 includes non-recurring tax benefits of $1.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The Companys major tax jurisdiction is the United States and its U.S. federal income tax return
has been examined by the tax authorities through October 31, 2004. The Company primarily does
business in all fifty states, significantly in California, Texas and New York. In major state
jurisdictions, the tax years after 2004 remain open and subject to examination by the appropriate
tax authorities. The Company is currently being examined by the states of Minnesota, Arizona,
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Utah and the commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
17. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the Companys defined benefit plans and the
post-retirement benefit plan, including participants associated with continuing operations, for the
three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
|
July 31 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Defined Benefit Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
Interest |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement Benefit Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Interest |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Amortization of actuarial gain |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R. The purpose of issuing the statement was to
replace current guidance in SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, to better represent the economic
value of a business combination transaction. The changes to be effected with SFAS No. 141R from the
current guidance include, but are not limited to: (1) acquisition costs will be recognized
separately from the acquisition; (2) known contractual contingencies at the time of the acquisition
will be considered part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value and all other
contingencies will be part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value only if it is
more likely than not that they meet the definition of a liability; (3) contingent consideration
based on the outcome of future events will be recognized and measured at the time of the
acquisition; (4) business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisitions) will need to
recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as noncontrolling interests, in the
acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values; and (5) a bargain purchase (defined as a
business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any noncontrolling interest
in the acquiree) will require that excess to be recognized as a gain attributable to the acquirer.
Subsequent to the issuance of SFAS No. 141R, in April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 141R-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies (FSP SFAS 141R-1).
FSP SFAS 141R-1 amends the provisions in SFAS No. 141R for the
initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for
assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. FSP SFAS 141R-1
eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the
initial recognition and measurement criteria in Statement 141R and instead carries forward most of
the provisions in SFAS 141 for acquired contingencies. The Company anticipates the adoption of SFAS
No. 141R and FSP SFAS 141R-1 will have an impact on the way in which business combinations will be
accounted for compared to current practice. SFAS No. 141R and FSP SFAS 141R-1 will be effective
beginning with any business combinations that close in fiscal year 2010.
20
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 was issued to improve the
relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial information provided to investors by
requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the same
way, that is, as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, SFAS No. 160 eliminates
the diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and
noncontrolling interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 will be
effective beginning in fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that
SFAS No. 160 will have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP SFAS 142-3). FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS
No. 142). The objective of FSP SFAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, and other
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP SFAS 142-3 will be effective beginning in fiscal
year 2010. The Company anticipates the adoption of FSP SFAS 142-3 will have an impact on the way
in which the useful lives of intangible assets acquired in a business combination under SFAS No.
141R will be determined compared to current practice, if renewal or extension terms are apparent.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. SFAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP SFAS 132R-1). FSP SFAS 132R-1 expands the disclosures
set forth in SFAS No. 132R, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106 by adding required disclosures
about how investment allocation decisions are made by management, major categories of plan assets,
and significant concentrations of risk. Additionally, FSP SFAS 132R-1 requires an employer to
disclose information about the valuation of plan assets similar to that required under SFAS
No. 157. FSP SFAS 132R-1 intends to enhance the transparency surrounding the types of assets and
associated risks in an employers defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP SFAS
132R-1 will be effective beginning in fiscal year 2010. The adoption of FSP SFAS 132R-1 will not
have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations as it only
amends the required disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principlesa replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162 (SFAS No. 168). All existing accounting standard documents are superseded and all other
accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative.
SFAS No. 168 will be effective beginning with the Companys annual report ending October 31, 2009.
The adoption of SFAS No. 168 will not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements as it only amends the referencing to existing accounting standards.
21
|
|
|
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements of ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM, and together with its subsidiaries, the
Company) included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended October 31, 2008 (10-K/A). All information in the discussion and references to years
are based on the Companys fiscal year, which ends on October 31.
Overview and Executive Summary
The Company provides janitorial, parking, security and engineering services for thousands of
commercial, industrial, institutional and retail facilities in hundreds of cities primarily
throughout the United States. The Company was reincorporated in Delaware on March 19, 1985 as the
successor to a business founded in California in 1909.
On November 14, 2007, the Company acquired OneSource Services, Inc. (OneSource), a janitorial
facility services company for $365.0 million, which was paid by a combination of current cash and
borrowings from the Companys line of credit. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. In 2008, the Company realized approximately $29.8 million of synergies in
connection with this acquisition, before giving effect to the costs to achieve these synergies. The
synergies were achieved primarily through a reduction in duplicative positions and back office
functions, the consolidation of facilities, and the reduction of professional fees and other
services. The synergies were fully implemented in January 2009. The Company realized $34.5 million
of synergies in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 and expects to realize approximately $46.0
million of synergies in the full year ended 2009, before giving effect to the costs to achieve
these synergies.
On October 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of the
Companys Lighting division, excluding accounts receivable and certain other assets and
liabilities, to Sylvania Lighting Services Corp. The remaining assets and liabilities associated
with the Lighting division have been classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued
operations for all periods presented. The results of operations of the Lighting division for all
periods presented are classified as (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes.
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company acquired certain assets (primarily customer contracts and
relationships) of Control Building Services, Inc., Control Engineering Services, Inc., and TTF,
Inc. (Control acquisition), for $15.1 million in cash, which includes direct acquisition costs of
$0.1 million, plus additional consideration of up to $1.6 million, payable in three equal
installments of $0.5 million, contingent upon the achievement of certain revenue targets during the
three year period commencing on May 1, 2009. The acquisition closed on May 8, 2009 and was
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The acquisition expands ABMs janitorial and
engineering service offerings to clients in the Northeast region. The Company expects to finalize
the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired during the remainder of 2009.
Revenues have historically been the major source of cash for the Company, while payroll expenses,
which are substantially related to revenues, have been the largest use of cash. The Companys
revenues at its Janitorial, Security and Engineering divisions are substantially based on the
performance of labor-intensive services at contractually specified prices. Revenues generated by
the Parking division relate to parking and transportation services, which are less labor-intensive.
In addition to services defined within the scope of customer contracts, the Janitorial division
also generates revenues from extra services (or tags) such as additional cleaning requirements,
including flood cleanup services and snow removal, which generally provide higher margins. The
Companys revenues are primarily impacted by the ability to retain and attract customers, the
addition of industrial customers, commercial occupancy rates, air travel levels, tourism and
transportation needs at colleges and universities.
22
The Companys management views operating cash flows as a good indicator of financial strength.
Strong operating cash flows provide opportunities for growth both internally and through
acquisitions. Cash flows from operating activities, including cash flows from discontinued
operating activities, increased by $39.6 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2009, compared
to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities
increased $17.9 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended
July 31, 2008. Operating cash flows primarily depend on revenue levels, the timing of collections
and payments to suppliers and other vendors, the quality of receivables, and the magnitude of
self-insured claims. The Companys trade accounts receivable, net, balance was $470.5 million at
July 31, 2009. Trade accounts receivable that were over 90 days past due increased $1.0 million to
$48.3 million at July 31, 2009 compared to October 31, 2008.
The Company periodically evaluates its estimated claim costs and liabilities and accrues
self-insurance reserves to its best estimate three times during the fiscal year. Management also
monitors new claims and claim development to assess appropriate levels of insurance reserves. The
self-insurance reserves are intended to reflect recent experience and trends. The trend analysis is
complex and highly subjective. The interpretation of trends requires knowledge of many factors that
may or may not be reflective of adverse or favorable developments (e.g., changes in regulatory
requirements and changes in reserving methodology). Trends may also be impacted by changes in
safety programs or claims handling practices. If the trends suggest that the frequency or severity
of claims incurred has changed, the Company might be required to record increases or decreases in
expenses for self-insurance liabilities. Actuarial evaluations (using claims data as of January 31,
2009 and May 31, 2009), covering the majority of the Companys self-insurance reserves related to
prior years and excluding the claims acquired from OneSource, resulted in a $3.5 million increase
in the self-insurance reserves recorded in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009. The
comparative prior year actuarial evaluations (using claims data as of January 31, 2008 and May 31,
2008), covering the majority of the Companys self-insurance reserves related to prior years and
excluding claims acquired from OneSource (the evaluation of the claims for OneSource were completed
during the three months ended October 31, 2008), resulting in a $7.6 million and a $14.8 million
decrease in the self-insurance reserves for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2008,
respectively. These adjustments have been recorded in the Corporate division for all periods
presented.
The following is an executive summary for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
Revenues decreased 5.7% and 3.8% in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009,
respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
Operating profit, excluding the Corporate segment, increased 6.5% and 18.6% in the three and
nine months ended July 31, 2009, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended
July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
Net income decreased 25.2% to $12.3 million ($0.24 per diluted share) and increased
16.0% to $39.3 million ($0.76 per diluted share) in the three and nine months ended July
31, 2009, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, including cash flows from discontinued
operating activities, increased $39.6 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. Net cash provided by discontinued
operating activities increased $17.9 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
As a result of actuarial evaluations of the Companys self-insurance reserves related to
prior year claims, the self-insurance reserves increased by $3.5 million in the nine months
ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $14.8 million reduction in self-insurance reserves
related to prior years recorded in the nine months ended July 31, 2008. Accordingly, this
resulted in a decrease in income from continuing operations before income taxes of $18.3
million in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31,
2008; |
|
|
|
A net legal settlement of $9.6 million was received in January 2009 from the Companys
third party administrator related to poor claims management; |
|
|
|
The Company identified an other-than-temporary impairment related to one of its
investments in auction rate securities of $3.6 million, of which $1.6 million was recorded
through earnings; and |
|
|
|
The Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.13 per
share. |
23
Due to the weak economic climate, the Company continues to experience some reductions in the level
and scope of services provided to its customer base, contract price compression and a decline in
the level of tag work as a result of decreases in customer discretionary spending. Despite the weak
economic climate, operating profit increased in the Janitorial and Security divisions during the
three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008. Operating profit
decreased in the Parking and Engineering divisions during the three months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008. However, operating profit increased in all the
divisions during the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31,
2008. In general, these increases in operating profit were attributable to the Companys ability to
maintain acceptable gross profit margins and operating profits, primarily from aggressive cost
control and the reduction of less profitable customer contracts.
Achieving the desired levels of revenues and profitability in the future will depend on the
Companys ability to retain and attract, at acceptable profit margins, more customers than it
loses, to pass on cost increases to customers, and to keep overall costs low to remain competitive,
particularly against privately-owned facility services companies that typically have a lower cost
advantage.
In the short term, the Company will continue to take proactive measures surrounding its customer
contracts, including working with existing customers to reduce their monthly expenses to meet their
cost pressures. The Company will continue to monitor and in some cases eliminate contracts with
customers that are at high risk of bankruptcy or produce low margins and focus resources on work
that may generate less revenue, but produce higher margins. In the long term, the Company expects
to grow the business through strategic acquisitions and international expansion to respond to the
demand for a global provider.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
23,573 |
|
|
$ |
26,741 |
|
|
$ |
(3,168 |
) |
Working capital |
|
$ |
265,725 |
|
|
$ |
273,980 |
|
|
$ |
(8,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
76,465 |
|
|
$ |
36,833 |
|
|
$ |
39,632 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(32,293 |
) |
|
$ |
(446,816 |
) |
|
$ |
414,523 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
(47,340 |
) |
|
$ |
286,860 |
|
|
$ |
(334,200 |
) |
As of July 31, 2009, the Companys cash and cash equivalents balance was $23.6 million. The
decrease in cash is principally due to the timing of net borrowings under the Companys line of
credit, collections of accounts receivable and payments made on vendor invoices.
The Company believes that the cash generated from operations and amounts available under its $450.0
million line of credit will be sufficient to meet the Companys cash requirements for the
long-term, except to the extent cash is required for significant acquisitions, if any. Available
credit under the line of credit was $135.4 million as of July 31, 2009.
Working Capital. Working capital decreased by $8.3 million to $265.7 million at July 31, 2009 from
$274.0 million at October 31, 2008. Excluding the effects of discontinued operations, working
capital increased by $11.7 million to $261.3 million at July 31, 2009 from $249.6 million at
October 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
a $12.3 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities primarily due to
the timing of payments made on vendor invoices; |
|
|
|
an $8.1 million increase in prepaid income taxes primarily due to the timing of payments
and the utilization of OneSource acquired tax assets; and |
|
|
|
a $2.0 million increase in prepaid expenses and other primarily due to the timing of
payments; |
24
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $3.2 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents; |
|
|
|
a $2.7 million decrease in trade accounts receivable, net, primarily due to the decrease
in revenues; |
|
|
|
a $2.5 million increase in income taxes payable; and |
|
|
|
a $2.1 million decrease in deferred income taxes, net, primarily due to the utilization
of the acquired OneSource deferred tax assets during the nine months ended July 31, 2009. |
Trade accounts receivable that were over 90 days past due were $48.3 million and $47.3 million at
July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $76.5 million
for the nine months ended July 31, 2009, compared to $36.8 million for the nine months ended July
31, 2008. The increase in cash flows from operating activities of $39.6 million is due to:
|
|
|
a $17.9 million increase in net cash provided by discontinued operating activities,
primarily due to the collections of accounts receivable during the nine months ended July
31, 2009. Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities was $23.8 million for the
nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to $5.9 million for the nine months ended July 31,
2008; |
|
|
|
a $11.0 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to the utilization of
the acquired OneSource deferred tax assets during the nine months ended July 31, 2009; and |
|
|
|
an increase in net income of $5.4 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 as
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $1.4 million decrease in continuing operating assets and liabilities principally
related to
changes in trade accounts receivable, net, and the timing of payments for accounts payable
and other accrued liabilities. |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months
ended July 31, 2009 was $32.3 million, compared to $446.8 million for the nine months ended July
31, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to $15.1 million paid for the Control acquisition in the nine
months ended July 31, 2009 as compared to $390.5 million and $24.4 million paid for OneSource and
the remaining 50% of the equity of Southern Management, respectively, in the nine months ended July
31, 2008.
No significant cash flows were provided by discontinued investing activities for the nine months
ended July 31, 2009 and 2008.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $47.3 million for
the nine months ended July 31, 2009, compared to net cash provided by of $286.9 million for the
nine months ended July 31, 2008. In the nine months ended July 31, 2008, the Companys net
borrowings of $285.0 million from the Companys line of credit were primarily due to the
acquisition of OneSource and the purchase of the remaining 50% of the equity of Southern Management
Company. During the nine months ended July 31, 2009 the Company paid down $34.0 million on the line
of credit.
No cash flows were provided by discontinued financing activities for the nine months ended July 31,
2009 and 2008.
Line of Credit. In connection with the acquisition of OneSource, ABM entered into a $450.0 million
five year syndicated line of credit that is scheduled to expire on November 14, 2012 (the
Facility). The Facility is available for working capital, the issuance of standby letters of
credit, the financing of capital expenditures, and other general corporate purposes.
As of July 31, 2009, the total outstanding amounts under the Facility in the form of cash
borrowings and standby letters of credit were $196.0 million and $118.6 million, respectively.
Available credit under the Facility was $135.4 million as of July 31, 2009.
25
The Facility includes covenants limiting liens, dispositions, fundamental changes, investments,
indebtedness and certain transactions and payments. In addition, the Facility also requires that
ABM maintain the following three financial covenants which are described in Note 5, Line of Credit
Facility, to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A: (1) a fixed charge coverage ratio; (2) a leverage ratio; and (3) a combined net
worth test. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of July 31, 2009 and expects to be
in compliance for the foreseeable future.
On February 19, 2009, the Company entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement with a
notional amount of $100.0 million, involving the exchange of floating- for fixed-rate interest
payments. The Company will receive 1 month LIBOR floating-rate interest payments that offset the
LIBOR component of the interest due on $100.0 million of the Companys floating-rate debt and make
fixed-rate interest payments of 1.47% over the life of the interest rate swap. The
Company assesses the effectiveness of the Companys hedging strategy using the method described in
Derivatives Implementation Group Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. G9, Cash Flow Hedges:
Assuming No Ineffectiveness When Critical Terms of the Hedging Instrument and the Hedged
Transaction Match in a Cash Flow Hedge. Additionally, the Company assesses the creditworthiness of
each swap counterparty to determine the possibility of whether the counterparty to the derivative
instrument will default by failing to make any contractually required payments as scheduled in the
derivative instrument. The Company also assesses whether its LIBOR-based interest payments are
probable of being paid under the loan at the inception and, on an ongoing basis (no less than once
each quarter), during the life of each hedging relationship.
As of July 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate swap was ($0.7) million. The effective
portion of the cash flow hedges are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive loss in the
Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet and reclassified into interest expense, net in the
Companys condensed consolidated statements of income in the same period during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges are recorded
immediately to interest expense, net. No ineffectiveness existed at July 31, 2009, therefore the
amount included in accumulated other comprehensive loss was ($0.7) million ($0.4 million, net of
taxes).
26
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended July 31, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended July 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
870,635 |
|
|
$ |
923,667 |
|
|
$ |
(53,032 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
782,449 |
|
|
|
818,887 |
|
|
|
(36,438 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
64,736 |
|
|
|
72,317 |
|
|
|
(7,581 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
)% |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
850,137 |
|
|
|
893,722 |
|
|
|
(43,585 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
20,498 |
|
|
|
29,945 |
|
|
|
(9,447 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
(55.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
17,460 |
|
|
|
26,607 |
|
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
(34.4 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
(5,203 |
) |
|
|
(50.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
16,344 |
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
)% |
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,276 |
|
|
$ |
16,412 |
|
|
$ |
(4,136 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income. Net income in the three months ended July 31, 2009 decreased by $4.1 million, or 25.2%,
to $12.3 million ($0.24 per diluted share) from $16.4 million ($0.32 per diluted share) in the
three months ended July 31, 2008. Net income included a loss of $0.1 million and income of $0.1
million from discontinued operations in the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations in the three months ended July
31, 2009 decreased by $3.9 million, or 24.1%, to $12.4 million ($0.24 per diluted share) from $16.3
million ($0.32 per diluted share) in the three months ended July 31, 2008.
The decrease in income from continuing operations was primarily a result of:
|
|
|
a $3.5 million increase in self-insurance reserves related to prior year claims recorded
in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $7.6 million reduction in
self-insurance reserves related to prior years recorded in the three months ended July 31,
2008. Accordingly, this resulted in a decrease in income from continuing operations before
income taxes of $11.1 million in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the three
months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
a $1.7 million increase in information technology costs, including higher depreciation
costs related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and accounting systems; and |
|
|
|
a $1.6 million credit loss associated with the other-than-temporary impairment of the
Companys investment in auction rate securities; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $5.2 million decrease in income taxes primarily due to lower taxable income combined
with $1.7 million of non-recurring tax benefits; |
|
|
|
a $2.9 million increase in operating profit, excluding the Corporate segment, primarily
resulting from aggressive cost control; |
27
|
|
|
a $1.9 million decrease in interest expense as a result of a lower average outstanding
balance and average interest rate under the Facility; |
|
|
|
a $0.6 million decrease in expenses associated with the move of the Companys
headquarters to New York in fiscal year 2008; |
|
|
|
a $0.5 million decrease in professional fees, net of increases in payroll and payroll
related costs associated with in-sourcing these functions; and |
|
|
|
a $0.4 million decrease in expenses associated with the integration of OneSources
operations. |
Revenues. Revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2009 decreased $53.0 million, or 5.7%, to
$870.6 million from $923.7 million in the three months ended July 31, 2008. The Company and its
customers continue to feel the negative impact of the weak economic environment resulting in
reductions in the level and scope of services provided to its customers, contract price
compression, the reduction of less profitable customer contracts and a decline in the level of tag
work as a result of decreases in customer discretionary spending. However, approximately $5.5 million, or 10.4%,
of the decrease in revenues is due to the reduction of expenses incurred on the behalf of managed
parking facilities, which are reimbursed to the Company. These reimbursed expenses are recognized
as parking revenues and expenses, which have no impact on operating profit.
Operating Expenses. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin was 10.1% and 11.3% in the three
months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage was
primarily the result of a $3.5 million increase in self-insurance reserves related to prior year
claims recorded in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $7.6 million reduction in
self-insurance reserves related to prior years recorded in the three months ended July 31, 2008.
Accordingly, this resulted in an increase in operating expenses of $11.1 million in the three
months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008.
Selling General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$7.6 million, or 10.5%, in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
July 31, 2008.
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily a result of:
|
|
|
a $7.8 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs at the Janitorial
division, primarily attributable to aggressive cost control; |
|
|
|
a $0.6 million decrease in expenses associated with the move of the Companys
headquarters to New York in fiscal year 2008; |
|
|
|
a $0.5 million decrease in professional fees, net of increases in payroll and payroll
related costs associated with in-sourcing these functions; and |
|
|
|
a $0.4 million decrease in expenses associated with the integration of OneSources
operations; |
|
|
|
a $1.7 million increase in information technology costs, including higher depreciation
costs related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and accounting systems. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense in the three months ended July 31, 2009 decreased $1.9 million,
or 55.9%, to $1.5 million from $3.3 million in the three months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease
was primarily related to a lower average outstanding balance and average interest rate under the
Facility in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008.
The average outstanding balance under the Companys line of credit was $205.0 million and $284.7
million during the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the three months
ended July 31, 2009 was 29.0%, compared to the 38.6% for the three months ended July 31, 2008. The
effective tax rate for the three months ended July 31, 2009 includes $1.7 million of non-recurring
tax benefits.
Discontinued Operations. The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $0.2 million
($0.1 million, net of income tax benefits) for the three months ended July 31, 2009. The losses
recorded are due to severance related costs and selling, general and administrative transition
costs. The effective tax rate on discontinued operations for the three months ended July
31, 2009 was 15.9%, compared to the 47.7% for the three months ended July 31, 2008.
28
Segment Information. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information (SFAS No. 131) Janitorial, Parking, Security, and Engineering are
reportable segments. In connection with the discontinued operation of the Lighting division, the
operating results of Lighting are classified as discontinued operations and, as such, are not
reflected in the tables below.
Most Corporate expenses are not allocated. Such expenses include the adjustments to the Companys
self-insurance reserves relating to prior years, severance costs associated with the integration of
OneSources operations into the Janitorial segment, the Companys share-based compensation costs,
the completion of the corporate move to New York, and certain information technology costs. Segment
revenues and operating profits of the continuing reportable segments (Janitorial, Parking,
Security, and Engineering) for the three months ended July 31, 2009, compared to the three months
ended July 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
595,115 |
|
|
$ |
638,508 |
|
|
$ |
(43,393 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
)% |
Parking |
|
|
114,721 |
|
|
|
119,814 |
|
|
|
(5,093 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
Security |
|
|
84,501 |
|
|
|
85,347 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
Engineering |
|
|
75,782 |
|
|
|
79,616 |
|
|
|
(3,834 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
870,635 |
|
|
$ |
923,667 |
|
|
$ |
(53,032 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
35,043 |
|
|
$ |
31,678 |
|
|
$ |
3,365 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Parking |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Security |
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
4,857 |
|
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
(27,121 |
) |
|
|
(14,788 |
) |
|
|
(12,333 |
) |
|
|
83.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
20,498 |
|
|
|
29,945 |
|
|
|
(9,447 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
(55.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
17,460 |
|
|
$ |
26,607 |
|
|
$ |
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
(34.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of operations from the Companys segments for the three months ended July 31, 2009,
compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008, are more fully described below.
Janitorial.
Janitorial revenues decreased $43.4 million, or 6.8%, during the three months ended
July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease in revenues is due to
reductions in the level and scope of services provided to its customers, contract price compression
and a decline in the level of tag work as a result of decreases in customer discretionary spending.
Operating profit increased $3.4 million, or 10.6%, during the three months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to
aggressive cost control offset by the reduction of revenues.
29
Parking. Parking revenues decreased $5.1 million, or 4.3%, during the three months ended July 31,
2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily a result of a
$5.5 million reduction of expenses incurred on the behalf of managed parking facilities, which are
reimbursed to the Company. These reimbursed expenses are recognized as parking revenues and
expenses, which have no impact on operating profit.
Operating profit decreased $0.5 million, or 9.1%, during the three months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008 due to a slight decrease in profit margins.
Security. Security revenues decreased $0.8 million, or 1.0%, during the three months ended July 31,
2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008, primarily due to the loss of customer
contracts and reductions in the level of services to existing customers.
Operating profit increased $0.7 million, or 33.0%, in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared
to the three months ended July 31, 2008, primarily due to decreases in discretionary and overhead
costs partially offset by the reduction in revenues.
Engineering. Engineering revenues decreased $3.8 million, or 4.8%, during the three months ended
July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008, primarily due to the loss of
customer contracts.
Operating profit decreased by $0.7 million, or 12.1%, in the three months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008, primarily due to the loss of revenues.
Corporate. Corporate expense increased $12.3 million, or 83.4%, in the three months ended July 31,
2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008.
The increase in Corporate expense was primarily a result of:
|
|
|
a $3.5 million increase in self-insurance reserves related to prior year claims recorded
in the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $7.6 million reduction in
self-insurance reserves related to prior years recorded in the three months ended July 31,
2008. Accordingly, this resulted in an increase in corporate expenses of $11.1 million in
the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008; and |
|
|
|
a $1.7 million increase in information technology costs, including higher depreciation
costs related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and accounting systems; |
|
|
|
|
partially offset by: |
|
|
|
a $0.6 million decrease in expenses associated with the move of the Companys
headquarters to New York in fiscal year 2008; |
|
|
|
a $0.5 million decrease in professional fees, net of increases in payroll and payroll
related costs associated with in-sourcing these functions; and |
|
|
|
a $0.4 million decrease in expenses associated with the integration of OneSources
operations. |
30
Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2009 vs. Nine Months Ended July 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,613,818 |
|
|
$ |
2,717,808 |
|
|
$ |
(103,990 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
2,335,865 |
|
|
|
2,428,989 |
|
|
|
(93,124 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
200,388 |
|
|
|
207,694 |
|
|
|
(7,306 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
7,443 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
2,544,708 |
|
|
|
2,644,126 |
|
|
|
(99,418 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
69,110 |
|
|
|
73,682 |
|
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
(7,475 |
) |
|
|
(62.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
63,091 |
|
|
|
61,754 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
22,887 |
|
|
|
23,839 |
|
|
|
(952 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
40,204 |
|
|
|
37,915 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
(4,065 |
) |
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
NM |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,270 |
|
|
$ |
33,850 |
|
|
$ |
5,420 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income. Net income in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 increased by $5.4 million, or 16.0%,
to $39.3 million ($0.76 per diluted share) from $33.9 million ($0.66 per diluted share) in the nine
months ended July 31, 2008. Net income included a loss of $0.9 million ($0.02 per diluted share)
and $4.1 million ($0.08 per diluted share) from discontinued operations in the nine months ended
July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations in the nine months ended July
31, 2009 increased by $2.3 million, or 6.0%, to $40.2 million ($0.78 per diluted share) from $37.9
million ($0.74 per diluted share) in the nine months ended July 31, 2008.
31
The increase in income from continuing operations was primarily a result of :
|
|
|
a $21.3 million increase in operating profit, excluding the Corporate segment, primarily
resulting from aggressive cost control and lower labor expenses resulting from one less
working day; |
|
|
|
a $9.6 million net legal settlement received in January 2009 from the Companys former
third party administrator of workers compensation claims related to poor claims
management; |
|
|
|
a $7.5 million decrease in interest expense as a result of a lower average outstanding
balance and average interest rate under the Facility; |
|
|
|
the absence of a $1.5 million charge associated with a legal claim recorded in the nine
months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
a $1.9 million decrease in expenses associated with the integration of OneSources
operations; and |
|
|
|
a $1.0 million decrease in income taxes primarily due to non-recurring tax benefits of
$1.5 million; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $3.5 million increase in self-insurance reserves related to prior year claims recorded
in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $14.8 million reduction in
self-insurance reserves related to prior years recorded in the nine months ended July 31,
2008. Accordingly, this resulted in a decrease in income from continuing operations before
income taxes of $18.3 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
a $14.4 million increase in information technology costs, including higher depreciation
costs related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and accounting systems; |
|
|
|
a $3.4 million increase in professional fees, which includes increases in payroll and
payroll related costs associated with in-sourcing these functions; |
|
|
|
a $1.8 million increase in costs associated with the centralization of certain back
office support functions; and |
|
|
|
a $1.6 million credit loss associated with the other-than-temporary impairment of the
Companys investment in auction rate securities. |
Revenues. Revenues in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 decreased $104.0 million, or 3.8%, to
$2,613.8 million from $2,717.8 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The Company and its
customers continue to feel the negative impact of the weak economic environment resulting in
reductions in the level and scope of services provided to its customers, contract price
compression, the reduction of less profitable customer contracts and a decline in the level of tag
work as a result of decreases in customer discretionary spending. However, approximately $16.7 million, or
16.0%, of the decrease in revenues is due to the reduction of expenses incurred on the behalf of
managed parking facilities, which are reimbursed to the Company. These reimbursed expenses are
recognized as parking revenues and expenses, which have no impact on operating profit.
Operating Expenses. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin was 10.6% in the nine months ended
July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The gross margin percentages are affected by the following:
|
|
|
a $3.5 million increase in self-insurance reserves related to prior year claims recorded
in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $14.8 million reduction in
self-insurance reserves related to prior years recorded in the nine months ended July 31,
2008. Accordingly, this resulted in an increase in operating expenses of $18.3 million in
the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008; and |
|
|
|
the net legal settlement received for $9.6 million in January 2009 from the Companys
former third party administrator related to poor claims management . |
Selling General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$7.3 million, or 3.5%, in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended
July 31, 2008.
32
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily a result of:
|
|
|
a $23.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs at the Janitorial
division, primarily attributable to aggressive cost control; |
|
|
|
a $1.9 million decrease in expenses associated with the integration of OneSources
operations; and |
|
|
|
the absence of a $1.5 million charge associated with a legal claim recorded in the nine
months ended July 31, 2008; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $14.4 million increase in information technology costs, including higher depreciation
costs related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and accounting systems; |
|
|
|
a $3.4 million increase in professional fees, which includes increases in payroll and
payroll related costs associated with in-sourcing these functions; and |
|
|
|
a $1.8 million increase in costs associated with the centralization of certain back
office support functions. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 decreased $7.5 million,
or 62.7%, to $4.5 million from $11.9 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease
was primarily related to a lower average outstanding balance and average interest rate under the
Facility in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008.
The average outstanding balance under the Companys line of credit was $219.7 million and $297.9
million during the nine months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the nine months ended
July 31, 2009 was 36.3%, compared to the 38.6% for the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The
effective tax rate for the nine months ended July 31, 2009 includes $1.5 million of non-recurring
tax benefits.
Discontinued Operations. The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $1.5 million
($0.9 million, net of income tax benefits), or $0.02 per diluted share, for the nine months ended
July 31, 2009. The losses recorded are due to severance related costs and selling, general and
administrative transition costs. The effective tax rate on loss from discontinued operations for
the nine months ended July 31, 2009 was 37.4%, compared to the 10.5% for the nine months ended July
31, 2008.
Segment Information. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Janitorial, Parking, Security, and
Engineering are reportable segments. In connection with the discontinued operation of the Lighting
division, the operating results of Lighting are classified as discontinued operations and, as such,
are not reflected in the tables below.
33
Most Corporate expenses are not allocated. Such expenses include the adjustments to the Companys
self-insurance reserves relating to prior years, severance costs associated with the integration of
OneSources operations into the Janitorial segment, the Companys share-based compensation costs,
the completion of the corporate move to New York, and certain information technology costs. Segment
revenues and operating profits of the continuing reportable segments (Janitorial, Parking,
Security, and Engineering) for the nine months ended July 31, 2009, compared to the nine months
ended July 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
1,792,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,870,096 |
|
|
$ |
(77,217 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
Parking |
|
|
343,737 |
|
|
|
356,346 |
|
|
|
(12,609 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
Security |
|
|
252,487 |
|
|
|
248,573 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
223,192 |
|
|
|
240,777 |
|
|
|
(17,585 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(24.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,613,818 |
|
|
$ |
2,717,808 |
|
|
|
(103,990 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
102,248 |
|
|
$ |
82,464 |
|
|
$ |
19,784 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
Parking |
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
13,717 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Security |
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
13,561 |
|
|
|
13,335 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(66,610 |
) |
|
|
(40,767 |
) |
|
|
(25,843 |
) |
|
|
63.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
69,110 |
|
|
|
73,682 |
|
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
(7,475 |
) |
|
|
(62.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
63,091 |
|
|
$ |
61,754 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of operations from the Companys segments for the nine months ended July 31, 2009,
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008, are more fully described below.
Janitorial. Janitorial revenues decreased $77.2 million, or 4.1%, during the nine months ended July
31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease in revenues is due to
reductions in the level and scope of services provided to its customers, contract price compression
and a decline in the level of tag work as a result of decreases in customer discretionary spending.
Operating profit increased $19.8 million, or 24.0%, during the nine months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to
aggressive cost control and lower labor expenses resulting from one less working day in the nine
months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The positive impact of
these items were partially offset by the reduction in revenues.
Parking. Parking revenues decreased $12.6 million, or 3.5%, during the nine months ended July 31,
2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease was a result of an $16.7 million
reduction of expenses incurred on the behalf of managed parking facilities, which are reimbursed to
the Company. These reimbursed expenses are recognized as parking revenues and expenses, which have
no impact on operating profit. The decrease in management reimbursement revenues was offset by a
$4.1 million increase in allowance, lease and visitor parking revenues from new customers and an
increased level of service to existing customers.
Operating profit increased $0.3 million, or 1.8%, during the nine months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to
additional profit from the increase in allowance, lease and visitor parking revenues partially
offset by a slight decrease in profit margins.
34
Security. Security revenues increased $3.9 million, or 1.6%, in the nine months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008. The increase in revenues is due to additional
revenues from new customers and the expansion of services to existing customers, partially offset
by loss of customer contracts.
Operating profit increased $1.0 million, or 20.5%, during the nine months ended July 31, 2009
compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008 due to an increase in revenues and a decrease in
discretionary and overhead costs partially offset by loss of customer contracts.
Engineering. Engineering revenues decreased $17.6 million, or 7.3%, during the nine months ended
July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008, primarily due to the loss of
customer contracts, primarily those with low gross profit margins, and the effects of one less work
day in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008.
Despite the reduction in revenues, operating profit increased $0.2 million, or 1.7%, in the nine
months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008, primarily due to higher
margins generated from contracts with new customers and decreases in discretionary and overhead
costs.
Corporate. Corporate expense increased $25.8 million, or 63.4%, in the nine months ended July 31,
2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008.
The increase in Corporate expense was primarily a result of:
|
|
|
a $3.5 million increase in self-insurance reserves related to prior year claims recorded
in the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to a $14.8 million reduction in
self-insurance reserves related to prior years recorded in the nine months ended July 31,
2008. Accordingly, this resulted in an increase in corporate expenses of $18.3 million in
the nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
a $14.4 million increase in information technology costs, including higher depreciation
costs related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and accounting systems; |
|
|
|
a $3.4 million increase in professional fees, which includes increases in payroll and
payroll related costs associated with in-sourcing these functions; and |
|
|
|
a $1.8 million increase in costs associated with the centralization of certain back
office support functions; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $9.6 million net legal settlement received in January 2009 from the Companys former
third party administrator of workers compensation claims related to poor claims
management; |
|
|
|
a $1.9 million decrease in expenses associated with the integration of OneSources
operations; and |
|
|
|
the absence of a $1.5 million charge associated with a legal claim recorded in the nine
months ended July 31, 2008. |
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
On January 20, 2009, ABM and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), entered into a
binding Memorandum of Understanding (the MOU) pursuant to which ABM and IBM agreed to: (1)
terminate certain services then provided by IBM to ABM under the Master Professional Services
Agreement dated October 1, 2006 (the Agreement); (2) transition the terminated services to ABM
and/or its designee; (3) resolve certain other disputes arising under the Agreement; and (4) modify
certain terms applicable to services that IBM will continue to provide to ABM. In connection with
the execution of the MOU, ABM delivered to IBM a formal notice terminating for convenience certain
information technology and support services effective immediately (the Termination).
Notwithstanding the Termination, the MOU contemplated (1) that IBM would assist ABM with the
transition of the terminated services to ABM or its designee pursuant to an agreement (the
Transition Agreement) to be executed by ABM and IBM and (2) the continued provision by IBM of
certain data center services. On February 24, 2009, ABM and IBM entered into an amended and restated Agreement, which amends the agreement (the Amended
Agreement), and the Transition Agreement, which memorializes the termination-related provisions of
the MOU as well as other terms related to the transition services. Under the Amended Agreement, the
base fee for the provision of the defined data center services is $18.8 million payable over the
service term (March 2009 through December 2013) as follows: 2009 $3.6 million; 2010 $4.4
million; 2011 $4.0 million ; 2012 $3.3 million; 2013 $3.0 million; and 2014 $0.5 million.
35
In connection with the Termination, ABM has agreed to: (1) reimburse IBM for certain actual
employee severance costs, up to a maximum of $0.7 million, provided ABM extends comparable offers
of employment to a minimum number of IBM employees; (2) reimburse IBM for certain early termination
costs, as defined, including third party termination fees and/or wind down costs totaling
approximately $0.4 million associated with software, equipment and/or third party contracts used by
IBM in performing the terminated services; and (3) pay IBM fees and expenses for requested
transition assistance which are estimated to be approximately $0.4 million. Payments made in
connection with the Termination were $0.4 million during the nine months ended July 31, 2009.
Contingencies
The Company is subject to various legal and arbitration proceedings and other contingencies that
arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, the Company accrues the amount of
probable and estimable losses related to such matters. At July 31, 2009, the total amount of
probable and estimable losses accrued for legal and other contingencies was $4.9 million. However,
the ultimate resolution of legal and arbitration proceedings and other contingencies is always
uncertain. If actual losses materially exceed the estimates accrued, the Companys financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In November 2008, the Company and its former third party administrator of workers compensation
claims settled a claim in arbitration for net proceeds of $9.6 million, after legal expenses,
related to poor claims management, which amount was received by the Company during January 2009 and
was classified as reduction in operating expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statement of income for the nine months ended July 31, 2009.
This settlement was recorded in the Corporate division.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than the arrangements that are discussed in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2008.
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements and Note 18, Recent Accounting
Pronouncements the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1,
Financial Statements for a discussion of recently adopted and recently issued accounting
pronouncements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Company to make
estimates in the application of its accounting policies based on the best assumptions, judgments,
and opinions of management. For a description of the Companys critical accounting policies, see
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, in
the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2008. Management
does not believe that there has been any material changes in the Companys critical accounting
policies and estimates during the nine months ended July 31, 2009.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular, statements found in
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that
are not historical in nature, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are often identified
by the words, will, may, should, continue, anticipate, believe, expect, plan,
appear, project, estimate, intend, and words of a similar nature. Such statements reflect
the current views of ABM with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these
statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
36
Any number of factors could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated. These factors include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
further declines in commercial office building occupancy and rental rates relating to a
deepening of the current recession; |
|
|
|
the inability to attract or grow revenues from new customers or loss of customers or
financial difficulties or bankruptcy of a major customer or multiple customers; |
|
|
|
the inability of customers to access the credit markets impacting the Companys ability
to collect receivables; |
|
|
|
a slowdown in the Companys acquisition activity, diversion of management focus from
operations as a result of acquisitions or failure to timely realize anticipated cost
savings and synergies from acquisitions; |
|
|
|
intense competition that lowers revenue or reduces margins; |
|
|
|
an increase in costs that the Company cannot pass on to customers; |
|
|
|
functional delays and resource constraints related to the Companys transition to new
information technology systems, the support of multiple concurrent projects relating to
these systems and delays in completing such projects; |
|
|
|
unanticipated costs or service disruptions associated with the transition of certain IT
services from IBM to third-party vendors or associated with providing those services
internally; |
|
|
|
disruption in functions affected by the transition to Shared Services Centers; |
|
|
|
the inability to collect accounts receivable retained by the Company in connection with
the sale of its lighting business; |
|
|
|
changes in estimated claims or in the frequency or severity of claims against the
Company, deterioration in claims management, cancellation or non-renewal of the Companys
primary insurance policies or changes in the Companys customers insurance needs; |
|
|
|
future fluctuations in the fair value of the Companys investment in auction rate
securities that are deemed other-than-temporarily impaired; |
|
|
|
increase in debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
labor disputes leading to a loss of sales or expense variations; |
|
|
|
natural disasters or acts of terrorism that disrupt the Company in providing services; |
|
|
|
events or circumstances that may result in impairment of goodwill recognized on the
OneSource or other acquisitions; |
|
|
|
significant accounting and other control costs that reduce the Companys profitability;
and |
|
|
|
the unfavorable outcome in one or more of the several class and representative action
lawsuits alleging various wage and hour claims or in other litigation. |
Additional information regarding these and other risks and uncertainties the Company faces is
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008
and in other reports it files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
The Companys primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The potential impact of adverse
increases in this risk is discussed below. The following sensitivity analysis does not consider the
effects that an adverse change may have on the overall economy nor does it consider actions the
Company may take to mitigate its exposure to these changes. Results of changes in actual rates may
differ materially from the following hypothetical results.
37
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to its cash equivalents and London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) based borrowings under the $450.0
million five year syndicated line of credit that expires on November 14, 2012. At July 31, 2009,
outstanding LIBOR and IBOR based borrowings of $196.0 million represented 100% of the Companys
total debt obligations. While these borrowings mature over the next 60 days, the line of credit
facility the Company has in place will continue to allow it to borrow against the line of credit
until November 14, 2012, subject to the terms of the credit facility. The Company anticipates
borrowing similar amounts for periods of one week to three months. If interest rates increase 1%
and the loan balance remains at $196.0 million, the impact on the Companys results of operations
for the remainder of 2009 would be approximately $0.5 million of additional interest expense, or
$0.1 million net of the effects of the interest rate swap agreement.
On February 19, 2009, the Company entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement with a
notional amount of $100.0 million, involving the exchange of floating- for fixed-rate interest
payments. The Company will receive 1 month LIBOR floating-rate interest payments that offset the
LIBOR component of the interest due on $100.0 million of the Companys floating-rate debt and make
fixed-rate interest payments of 1.47% over the life of the interest rate swap. The Company assesses
the effectiveness of the Companys hedging strategy using the method described in Derivatives
Implementation Group Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. G9, Cash Flow Hedges: Assuming No
Ineffectiveness When Critical Terms of the Hedging Instrument and the Hedged Transaction Match in a
Cash Flow Hedge. Additionally, the Company assesses the creditworthiness of each swap counterparty
to determine the possibility of whether the counterparty to the derivative instrument will default
by failing to make any contractually required payments as scheduled in the derivative instrument.
The Company also assesses whether its LIBOR-based interest payments are probable of being paid
under the loan at the inception and, on an ongoing basis (no less than once each quarter), during
the life of each hedging relationship. As of July 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate
swap was ($0.7) million. The effective portion of these cash flow hedges are recorded as
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet and
reclassified into interest expense, net in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of
income in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective
portions of the cash flow hedges are recorded immediately to interest expense, net. No
ineffectiveness existed at July 31, 2009, therefore the amount included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss was ($0.7) million ($0.4 million, net of taxes).
As of July 31, 2009, the Company held investments in auction rate securities from five different
issuers totaling $19.7 million. The Company continues to receive the scheduled interest payments
from the issuers of the securities. During the first quarter of 2009, one issuer provided a notice
of default. This default was cured on March 10, 2009 and all subsequent interest payments have been
made by the issuer since that date. The scheduled interest and principal payments of that security
are guaranteed by a U.K. financial guarantee insurance company, which made the guaranteed interest
payments as scheduled during the first quarter of 2009. At July 31, 2009, a rating agency
downgraded its rating of this issuer to below investment grade. The remaining four securities are
rated investment grade by rating agencies.
For the three months ended July 31, 2009, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment
of $3.6 million for the security whose rating was recently downgraded to below investment grade, of
which a credit loss of $1.6 million was recognized in earnings (See Note 14, Auction Rate
Securities, of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1,
Financial Statements.) Based on the Companys ability to access its cash, its expected operating
cash flows, and other sources of cash, the Company does not anticipate that the lack of liquidity
of these investments will affect the Companys ability to operate its business in the ordinary
course. The Company continues to monitor the market for auction rate securities and considers its
impact (if any) on the fair market value of its investments. If the current market conditions
continue, or the anticipated recovery in market values does not occur, the Company may be required
to record additional unrealized losses or record an additional impairment charge in the remainder
of fiscal year 2009.
Substantially all of the operations of the Company are conducted in the United States, and, as
such, are not subject to material foreign currency exchange rate risk.
38
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), the Companys principal executive
officer and principal financial officer evaluated the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, these officers concluded
that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, these disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by
the Company in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within the Company have
been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making
can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The Company is continuing to migrate its
financial and payroll systems to a new consolidated financial and payroll platform as part of an
on-going development of these systems which is expected to continue through fiscal year 2009.
Except as discussed above, there were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended July 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings of a nature considered normal to
its business, as well as, from time to time, in additional matters. The Company records accruals
for contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessments change or additional
information becomes available.
The Company is a defendant in the following class action or purported class action lawsuits related
to alleged violations of federal and/or state wage-and-hour laws:
|
|
|
the consolidated cases of Augustus, Hall and Davis v. American Commercial Security
Services (ACSS) filed July 12, 2005, in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles
County (L.A. Superior Ct.) (the Augustus case); |
|
|
|
the consolidated cases of Bucio and Martinez v. ABM Janitorial Services filed on April
7, 2006, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco ( the Bucio case); |
|
|
|
the consolidated cases of Batiz/Heine v. ACSS filed on June 7, 2006, in the U.S.
District Court of California, Central District (the Batiz case); |
|
|
|
the consolidated cases of Diaz/Morales/Reyes v. Ampco System Parking filed on December
5, 2006, in L.A. Superior Ct (the Diaz case); |
|
|
|
Chen v. Ampco System Parking and ABM Industries filed on March 6, 2008, in the U.S.
District Court of California, Southern District (the Chen case); and |
|
|
|
Khadera v. American Building Maintenance Co.-West and ABM Industries filed on March 24,
2008, in U.S. District Court of Washington, Western District (the Khadera case). |
As previously reported, on January 8, 2009, a judge of the California Superior Court certified the
Augustus case as a class action. The Company appealed this decision. On May 20, 2009, the appeal
was denied.
The named plaintiffs in the lawsuits described above are current or former employees of ABM
subsidiaries who allege, among other things, that they were required to work off the clock, were
not paid for all overtime, were not provided work breaks or other benefits, and/or that they
received pay stubs not conforming to state law. In all cases, the plaintiffs generally seek
unspecified monetary damages, injunctive relief or both. The Company believes it has meritorious
defenses to these claims and intends to continue to vigorously defend itself.
39
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors identified in the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2008, in response to Item 1A, Risk Factors, to Part I of the
Annual Report except for the addition of the following risk factor:
Certain fluctuations in the fair value of the Companys investment in auction rate securities that
are deemed other-than-temporarily impaired could negatively impact the Companys earnings. Any
future fluctuation in the fair value of the Companys investment in auction rate securities that
the Company deems temporary, including any recovery of previously unrealized losses, would be
recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes. If at any time in the future a
decline in value is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company will record a charge to
earnings for the credit loss portion of the impairment.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABM Industries Incorporated
|
|
September 3, 2009 |
/s/ James S. Lusk
|
|
|
James S. Lusk |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
September 3, 2009 |
/s/ Joseph F. Yospe
|
|
|
Joseph F. Yospe |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
41
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |