FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 000-51653
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
52-2336218 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
1111 Marcus Ave., Suite M04
|
|
11042 |
Lake Success, NY
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (516) 734-
3600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
þ Large accelerated filer |
|
o Accelerated filer |
|
o Non-accelerated
filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
o Smaller
reporting company |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As
of April 30, 2008, 42,628,125 shares of
the registrants common stock were outstanding.
DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share |
|
|
|
and per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
206,747 |
|
|
$ |
50,564 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,580 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $3,550
and $2,615 at March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively |
|
|
27,105 |
|
|
|
26,957 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
7,351 |
|
|
|
7,305 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
244,532 |
|
|
|
258,233 |
|
Non-current investments |
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
12,515 |
|
|
|
12,792 |
|
Software and web site developments costs, net |
|
|
10,972 |
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
62,321 |
|
|
|
69,528 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
116,733 |
|
|
|
117,702 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
Deferred taxes and other long-term assets |
|
|
13,979 |
|
|
|
13,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
479,806 |
|
|
$ |
482,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,414 |
|
|
$ |
4,762 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
12,527 |
|
Accrued other |
|
|
12,192 |
|
|
|
11,387 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
4,876 |
|
|
|
4,016 |
|
Due to acquirees |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
Capital leases payable |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
27,883 |
|
|
|
35,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases payable long-term |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Due to acquirees long-term |
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
Deferred tax
liabilities long-term |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
4,392 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
36,739 |
|
|
|
44,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000
shares authorized and no shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 175,000,000 shares
authorized; 42,634,269 shares issued and
42,628,229 shares outstanding at March 31, 2008
and 175,000,000 shares authorized; 42,556,925
shares issued and 42,552,723 shares outstanding
at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,040 and 4,202 shares
at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
417,750 |
|
|
|
413,428 |
|
Deferred stock-based compensation (APB 25) |
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
|
|
(2,056 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
20,860 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
443,067 |
|
|
|
438,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
479,806 |
|
|
$ |
482,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share |
|
|
|
amounts) |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
64,308 |
|
|
$ |
51,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue (1) |
|
|
28,612 |
|
|
|
21,300 |
|
Product development (1) |
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
Selling, general and administrative (1) |
|
|
29,732 |
|
|
|
21,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
61,486 |
|
|
|
44,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
4,293 |
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
(3,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
41,636,035 |
|
|
|
38,625,215 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
42,882,662 |
|
|
|
40,231,194 |
|
|
|
|
(1) Stock-based compensation expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was
classified as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
Product development |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,522 |
|
|
|
7,846 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales credits |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Amortization of deferred interest |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Amortization of bank financing costs |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Stock-based compensation windfall tax benefit |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions |
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,803 |
) |
|
|
(3,146 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(7,818 |
) |
|
|
(5,760 |
) |
Deferred revenue and other current liabilities |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,983 |
|
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(811 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(44,000 |
) |
|
|
(58,050 |
) |
Sale of short-term investments |
|
|
195,080 |
|
|
|
75,805 |
|
Capitalized software and web site development costs |
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
(957 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for net assets acquired, net of acquired cash |
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
(37,832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
146,902 |
|
|
|
(21,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Stock-based compensation windfall tax benefit |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
156,595 |
|
|
|
(14,130 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
Cash,
beginning of period |
|
|
50,564 |
|
|
|
47,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of
period |
|
$ |
206,747 |
|
|
$ |
33,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
3,356 |
|
Interest |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capitalized hardware, software and fixed assets |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
Deferred compensation reversal to equity |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
5
DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Business Description
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of
on-demand software, and data
solutions for the automotive and related specialty retail industries in the United States.
Utilizing the Internet, we have built a network connecting automotive dealers with banks, finance
companies, credit unions and other financing sources, and other service and information providers,
such as aftermarket providers and the major credit reporting agencies. We have established a
network of active relationships in the United States, which as of March 31, 2008, consisted of over
22,000 dealers, including approximately 90% of all franchised dealers; over 500 financing sources
and a number of other service and information providers to the automotive retail industry. Our
credit application processing product enables dealers to automate and accelerate the indirect
automotive financing process by increasing the speed of communications between these dealers and
their financing sources. We have leveraged our leading market position in credit application
processing to address other inefficiencies in the automotive retail industry value chain. We
believe our proven network provides a competitive advantage for distribution of our software and
data solutions. Our integrated subscription-based software products and services enable our dealer
customers to manage their dealership and operations, receive valuable consumer leads, compare
various financing and leasing options and programs, sell insurance and other aftermarket products,
analyze inventory, document compliance with certain laws and execute financing contracts
electronically. We have also created efficiencies for financing source customers by providing a
comprehensive digital and electronic contracting solution. In addition, we offer data and other
products and services to various industry participants, including lease residual value and
automobile configuration data.
2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of March 31, 2008 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form
10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and
footnotes required for a complete set of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair
statement have been included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the full year ending December 31, 2008. The December 31, 2007 balance sheet
information has been derived from the audited 2007 consolidated financial statements, but does not
include all disclosures required for a complete set of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. For further information,
please refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on February 28, 2008.
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159), which permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value
that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that
choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have elected not to apply SFAS No. 159 to any of
our existing assets or liabilities.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. For further information about the adoption of the required
provisions of SFAS No. 157 see Note 4.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS
No. 157-2 Effective Date of FASB Statement 157
delaying the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). We are currently evaluating the impact that this statement
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
6
4. Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS
No. 157, which defines the fair value as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use
of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair
values are as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest
priority to Level 1 inputs. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but
corroborated by market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The
fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. |
We have segregated all financial assets that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis
(at least annually) into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the
inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
include the following as of March 31, 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Value at |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
19,046 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,046 |
|
Non-current investments (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,046 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,214 |
|
|
$ |
37,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds with original maturity dates
of three months or less, for which we determine fair value through quoted market prices. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-current investments consist of auction rate securities (ARS) that are invested in
tax-exempt and tax-advantaged preferred stock trust securities. We classify investment
securities as available for sale, and as a result, report the investments at fair value.
Auction rate securities have long-term underlying maturities, but have interest rates that
are reset every one year or less. Our intent is not to hold these securities to maturity,
but rather to use the interest rate reset feature to provide liquidity as necessary. Our
investment in these securities generally provide higher interest rates than money market
and other cash equivalent investments. Due to the recent lack of observable market quotes on our
ARS portfolio due to failed auctions within the industry, we utilize valuation models that rely exclusively on Level 3 inputs
including those that are based on expected cash flow streams, including assessments of
counterparty credit quality, default risk underlying the security, discount rates and
overall capital market liquidity. The valuation of our ARS investment portfolio is subject
to uncertainties that are difficult to predict. If the issuers of these securities are
unable to successfully complete future auctions or refinance their obligations and their
credit ratings deteriorate, we may be required to adjust the carrying value of these
securities and recognize an impairment charge for an other-than temporary decline in the
fair value. We believe that we will be able to liquidate our investment without material
loss and that these securities are not permanently impaired, however, due to the
uncertainty of whether we will be able to sell these securities within the next year we
have reclassified them to long-term at March 31, 2008. Based on our available cash and
other investments, we do not currently anticipate that the lack of liquidity caused by
failed auctions will have a material adverse effect on our operating cash flows or will
affect our ability to operate our business as usual. |
The change in the carrying amount of investments for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
169,580 |
|
Net sales of auction rate securities |
|
|
(151,080 |
) |
Unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
18,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
7
5. Net Income per Share
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, we computed net income per share in
accordance SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share (SFAS No. 128). Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, assuming dilution, during
the period. The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes that (i) all stock options, which are in the money are exercised at the beginning
of the period and the
proceeds are used by us to purchase shares at the average market price for the period and (ii) if
applicable, unvested awards that are considered to be contingently issuable shares because they
contain either a performance or market condition will be included in diluted earnings per share in
accordance with SFAS No. 128 if dilutive and if their conditions (a) have been satisfied at the
reporting date or (b) would have been satisfied if the reporting date was the end of the
contingency period.
The following table sets forth the computation of
basic and diluted net income per share
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common stock outstanding (basic) |
|
|
41,636,035 |
|
|
|
38,625,215 |
|
Common equivalent shares from options to purchase
common stock, restricted common stock and
contingent restricted common stock (1) |
|
|
1,246,627 |
|
|
|
1,605,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common stock outstanding (diluted) |
|
|
42,882,662 |
|
|
|
40,231,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, we have excluded 393,333 and 386,667 contingently
issuable shares, respectively, from diluted weighted average common
stock outstanding as their contingent considerations (a) have not been
satisfied at the reporting date nor (b) would have been satisfied if
the reporting date was the end of the contingency period. (Refer to
Note 15 for further information). |
The following is a summary of the weighted
securities outstanding during the respective
periods that have been excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation because the
effect would have been antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
1,858,968 |
|
|
|
380,131 |
|
Restricted common stock |
|
|
73,084 |
|
|
|
77,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,932,052 |
|
|
|
457,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Comprehensive Income |
|
The components of comprehensive income were as
follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
731 |
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
5,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, the foreign currency translation
adjustment primarily represents the effect of translating the intangibles and goodwill related to
the Curomax acquisition.
8
7. Stock-Based Compensation Expense
We have three types of stock-based compensation programs: stock options, restricted
common stock and an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). For further information see Notes 2 and 12
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The following summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
|
$ |
1,225 |
|
Restricted common stock |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
ESPP |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
$3.5 million, of which $3.1 million was in accordance with FAS 123(R) and $0.4 million in
accordance with APB 25. Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 was $2.1 million, of which $1.6 million was in accordance with FAS 123(R) and
$0.5 million in accordance with APB 25.
Refer to Note 15 for further information regarding our long-term incentive equity awards.
8. Stock Repurchase Program
On March 18, 2008, the board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we
may spend up to $75 million to repurchase shares of our common stock. Stock repurchases under this
program may be made on the open market, through 10b5-1 programs, or in privately negotiated
transactions in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. The transactions may be
made from time to time without prior notice and in such amounts as our management deems appropriate
and will be funded from cash on hand. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of
repurchases will be based on several factors, including the price of our common stock, legal or
regulatory requirements, general business and market conditions, and other investment
opportunities. The stock repurchase program will expire on March 31, 2009, but may be limited or
terminated at any time by our Board of Directors without prior notice. There were no repurchases
under this program for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
9. Related Party Transactions
We entered into several agreements with a stockholder and its affiliates that is a
service provider for automotive dealers. These automotive dealers may utilize our network to access
customer credit reports and customer leads provided by or through this related party. We earn
revenue from this related party for each credit report or customer lead that is accessed using our
web-based service. The total amount of net revenue from this related party for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The total amount of
accounts receivable from this related party as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $0.2
million.
10. Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
16,987 |
|
|
$ |
16,719 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
2,189 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
5-11 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
22,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( 10,982 |
) |
|
|
( 9,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,515 |
|
|
$ |
12,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $1.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and is calculated on
a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.
9
11. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets principally are comprised of customer contracts, database, trade names,
licenses, patents, technology, non-competition agreements, and contractual agreements. The
amortization expense relating to intangible assets is recorded as a cost of revenue. The gross book
value, accumulated amortization and amortization periods of the intangible assets were as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
Book |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
(Years) |
|
Customer contracts |
| $ |
39,926 |
|
| $ |
(15,417 |
) |
| $ |
41,569 |
|
| $ |
(14,789 |
) |
|
|
2-4 |
|
Database |
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
(10,320 |
) |
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
(9,577 |
) |
|
|
3-6 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
(4,712 |
) |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
|
|
5-10 |
|
Patents/technology |
|
|
32,355 |
|
|
|
(16,012 |
) |
|
|
35,212 |
|
|
|
(16,618 |
) |
|
|
2-5 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
12,527 |
|
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
|
|
14,062 |
|
|
|
(6,214 |
) |
|
|
1-5 |
|
Contractual agreements |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
| $ |
116,141 |
|
| $ |
(53,820 |
) |
| $ |
123,076 |
|
| $ |
(53,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense that will be charged to income for the remaining period of 2008,
based on the March 31, 2008 book value, is approximately $16.7 million.
Amortization expense that will be charged to income for the subsequent five years and
thereafter is estimated, based on the March 31, 2008 book value, to be $18.4 million in 2009, $14.7
million in 2010, $6.2 million in 2011, $2.0 million in 2012, $0.7 million in 2013 and thereafter
$0.9 million.
Included in the gross book value as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, is foreign
currency translation of $2.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
12. Goodwill
The change in carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2008 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
| $ |
117,702 |
|
Impact of change in Canadian dollar exchange rate |
|
|
(929 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
| $ |
116,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Other Accrued Liabilities
Following is a summary of the components of other accrued liabilities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Taxes |
|
$ |
3,448 |
|
|
$ |
3,379 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Revenue share |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
Software licenses |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
Public company costs |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Severance |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
12,192 |
|
| $ |
11,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
14. Income Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 of FIN 48, on January 1, 2007. FIN 48
specifies the way public companies are to account for uncertainty in income tax reporting, and
prescribes the methodology for recognizing, reversing, and measuring the tax benefits of a tax
position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. Our adoption of FIN 48 did not result in
any change to the level of our liability for uncertain tax positions, and there was no adjustment
to our retained earnings for the cumulative effect of an accounting change. At January 1, 2008, the
total liability for uncertain tax positions recorded in our balance sheet in accrued other
liabilities was $0.1 million, and we expect the balance to remain unchanged at December 31, 2008.
We file a consolidated U.S. income tax return and tax returns in various state and local
jurisdictions. Certain of our subsidiaries also file income tax returns in Canada. The Internal
Revenue Service has completed its examination of our federal income tax returns through 2004.
Interest and penalties related to tax positions taken in our tax returns are recorded in
interest expense and general and administrative expenses, respectively, in our consolidated
statement of operations. At January 1, 2008, the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties
related to tax positions taken on our tax returns was zero. There was no significant change to this
amount during the first quarter of 2008.
15. Long-Term Incentive Equity Awards
On August 2, 2006, November 2, 2006, and July 21, 2007, the compensation committee of the
board of directors granted long-term performance equity awards (under the 2005 Incentive Award
Plan) consisting of 565,000 shares, 35,000 shares and 10,000 shares of restricted common stock,
respectively, to certain executive officers and other employees. Each individuals award is
allocated 50% to achieving earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as
adjusted to reflect any future acquisitions (EBITDA Performance Award) and 50% to the market value
of our common stock (Market Value Award). The awards are earned upon our achievement of EBITDA and
market-based targets for the fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, but will not vest unless the grantee
remains continuously employed in active service until January 31, 2010. If an EBITDA Performance
Award or Market Value Award is not earned in an earlier year, it can be earned upon achievement of
that target in a subsequent year. The awards will accelerate in full upon a change in control, if
any.
In accordance with FAS 123(R), we valued the EBITDA Performance Award and the Market
Value Award using the Black-Scholes and binomial lattice-based valuation pricing models,
respectively. The total fair value of the entire EBITDA Performance Award is $6.0 million (prior to
estimated forfeitures), of which, in January 2007, we began expensing on a straight-line basis the
amounts associated with the 2007 award as it was deemed probable that the threshold for the year
ended December 31, 2007 would be met. We have met the EBITDA target for 2007. The total value of
the entire Market Value Award is $2.5 million (including estimated forfeitures), which is expensed
on a straight-line basis from the date of grant over the applicable service period. As long as the
service condition is satisfied, the expense is not reversed, even if the market conditions are not
satisfied. As of March 31, 2008, we have not begun to expense the 2008 EBITDA Award as it has not
been deemed probable that the target will be achieved. We will continue to evaluate the
probability of achieving the target on a quarterly basis.
The expense recorded related to the EBITDA Performance Award and the Market Value Award for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
EBITDA Performance Award |
| $ |
166,718 |
|
| $ |
148,093 |
|
Market Value Award |
|
|
187,099 |
|
|
|
172,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Incentive Equity Awards expense |
| $ |
353,817 |
|
| $ |
320,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
EBITDA & Market Value Awards expense is included in restricted
common stock in the stock-based
compensation expense table in Note 7.
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Retail Sales Tax
The Ontario Ministry of Revenue (the Ministry) has conducted a retail sales tax field
audit on the financial records of our Canadian subsidiary, DealerTrack Canada, Inc. (formerly known
as DealerAccess Canada, Inc.), for the period from March 1, 2001 through May 31, 2003. We received
a formal assessment from the Ministry indicating unpaid Ontario retail sales tax totaling
approximately $0.2 million, plus interest. Although we are disputing the Ministrys findings, the
assessment, including interest, has been paid in order to avoid potential future interest and
penalties.
As part of the purchase agreement dated, December 31, 2003 between us and Bank of
Montreal for the purchase of 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of DealerAccess,
Inc., Bank of Montreal agreed to indemnify us specifically for this potential liability for all
sales tax periods prior to January 1, 2004. To date all amounts paid to the Ministry by us for this
assessment have been reimbursed by the Bank of Montreal under this indemnity.
11
We undertook a comprehensive review of the audit findings of the Ministry using external
tax experts. Our position has been that our financing source revenue transactions are not subject
to Ontario retail sales tax. We filed a formal Notice of Objection with the Ministry on
December 12, 2005. We received a letter dated November 2, 2007 from an appeals officer of the
Ministry stating that the assessment was, in his opinion, properly raised and his intention was to
recommend his confirmation to senior management of the Ministry. The officer agreed, however, to
defer his recommendation for a period of thirty business days to enable us to submit any additional
information not yet provided. We submitted additional information to the Ministry to support our
position that the services are not subject to sales tax.
We received a letter dated December 21, 2007 from a senior manager at the Ministry
stating that no change should be made to the appeals officers opinion. The letter further stated
that we had ninety days from the date of the letter to file a Notice of Appeal with the Superior
Court of Justice. A Notice of Appeal was filed on our behalf on March 18, 2008 to challenge the
assessment because we did not believe these services are subject to sales tax. We have not accrued
any related sales tax liability for the period subsequent to May 31, 2003, for these financing
source revenue transactions. This appeal is supported by the financial institutions whose source
revenue transactions were subject to the assessment. These financial institutions have agreed to
participate in the cost of the litigation.
In the event we are obligated to charge sales tax for this type of transaction, this Canadian
subsidiarys contractual arrangements with its financing source customers obligate these customers
to pay all sales taxes that are levied or imposed by any taxing authority by reason of the
transactions contemplated under the particular contractual arrangement. In the event of any failure
to pay such amounts, we would be required to pay the obligation, which could range from $4.0
million (CAD) to $4.5 million (CAD), including penalties and interest. Pursuant to the purchase
agreement discussed above, we would be indemnified by the Bank of Montreal for approximately $0.3
million of this potential sales tax liability.
Commitments
Pursuant to employment or severance agreements with certain employees, we have a
commitment to pay severance of approximately $7.8 million as of March 31, 2008 and $7.5 million as
of December 31, 2007, in the event of termination without cause, as defined in the agreements, as
well as certain potential gross-up payments to the extent any such severance payment would
constitute an excess parachute payment under the Internal Revenue Code.
On January 30, 2008, we entered into an inventory purchase agreement for 2,000 ePad units for
approximately $0.3 million. As of March 31, 2008, we have only received 120 units.
We are a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which we may be obligated to
indemnify the other party with respect to breach of contract, infringement and other matters.
Typically, these obligations arise in the context of agreements entered into by us, under which we
customarily agree to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from breaches of
representations, warranties and/or covenants. In these circumstances, payment by us is generally
conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the
particular agreement, which procedures typically allow us to challenge the other partys claims.
Further, our obligations under these agreements may be limited to indemnification of third-party
claims only and limited in terms of time and/or amount. In some instances, we may have recourse
against third parties for certain payments made by us.
It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these
or similar agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and
circumstances involved in each particular agreement. To date, we have not been required to make any
such payment. We believe that if we were to incur a loss in any of these matters, it is not
probable that such loss would have a material effect on our business or financial condition.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to litigation matters arising in connection with the
normal course of our business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition to the litigation matters arising in connection with the normal course of our business,
we are party to the litigation described below.
DealerTrack Inc. v. RouteOne LLC
On January 28, 2004, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against RouteOne LLC
(RouteOne) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Civil Action
No. CV 04-322 (SJF). The complaint seeks injunctive relief as well as damages against RouteOne for
infringement of two patents owned by us, which relate to computer implemented automated credit
application analysis and decision routing inventions (the Patents). The complaint also seeks relief
for RouteOnes acts of copyright infringement, circumvention of technological measures and common
law fraud and unfair competition.
The court has approved a joint stipulation of dismissal with respect to this action. Pursuant
to the joint stipulation, the patent count has been dismissed without prejudice to be pursued as
part of the below consolidated actions and all other counts have been dismissed with prejudice.
DealerTrack, Inc. v. Finance Express et al., CV-06-2335;
DealerTrack Inc. v. RouteOne and Finance Express et al., CV-06-6864; and
DealerTrack Inc. v. RouteOne and Finance Express et al., CV-07-215
On April 18, 2006, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against David Huber,
Finance Express and three of their unnamed dealer customers in the United States District Court for
the Central District of California, Civil Action No. CV-06-2335 AG (FMOx). The
complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as, damages against the defendants for
infringement of the Patents. We are also seeking relief for acts of copyright infringement and
unfair competition.
12
On June 8, 2006, David Huber and Finance Express filed their answer and counterclaims.
The counterclaims seek damages for libel related to an allegation in the complaint, breach of
contract, deceit, actual and constructive fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair
competition related to a confidentiality agreement between the parties. On October 26, 2006, the
Court dismissed the counterclaim for libel pursuant to a motion by us.
On October 27, 2006, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against RouteOne LLC,
David Huber and Finance Express in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California, Civil Action No. CV-06-6864 (SJF). The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as damages against the defendants for infringement of the Patents. On November 28,
2006 and December 4, 2006, respectively, defendants RouteOne, David Huber and Finance Express filed
their answers. Finance Express also asserted counterclaims for breach of contract, deceit, actual
and constructive fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition related to a
confidentiality agreement between Finance Express and us.
On February 20, 2007, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against RouteOne
LLC, David Huber and Finance Express in the United States District Court for the Central District
of California, Civil Action No. CV-07-215 (CWx). The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as damages against the defendants for infringement of U. S. Pat. No. 7,181,427 (the
427 Patent). On April 13, 2007 and April 17, 2007, respectively, defendants RouteOne, David Huber
and Finance Express filed their answers. RouteOne, David Huber and Finance Express asserted
counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of unenforceability due to inequitable conduct with
respect to the 427 Patent and the Patents. David Huber and Finance Express also asserted
counterclaims for breach of contract, deceit, actual and constructive fraud, misappropriation of
trade secrets and unfair competition related to a confidentiality agreement between Finance Express
and us.
The DealerTrack, Inc. v. Finance Express et al., CV-06-2335 action, the DealerTrack Inc.
v. RouteOne and Finance Express et al., CV-06-6864 action and the DealerTrack v. RouteOne and
Finance Express et al., CV-07-215 action, described above, have been consolidated by the Court. A
hearing on claims construction, referred to as a Markman hearing, was held on September 25, 2007.
A decision in the Markman hearing has not yet been issued. Fact and expert discovery are completed
and the parties are in the process of preparing motions for summary judgment and preparing for
trial. Trial of this action is scheduled to begin on July 22, 2008.
We intend to pursue our claims and defend any counter claims vigorously.
We believe that the potential liability from all current litigations will not have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations when resolved in a future
period.
17. Segment Information
In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information (SFAS No. 131) segment information is being reported consistent with our method of
internal reporting. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, operating segments are defined as components
of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly
by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. The chief operating decision maker reviews information at a consolidated level, as
such we have one reportable segment under SFAS No. 131. For enterprise-wide disclosure, we are
organized primarily on the basis of service lines. Revenue earned outside of the United States for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, is less than 10% of our total net revenue.
Supplemental disclosure of revenue by service type is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Transaction services revenue |
|
$ |
38,167 |
|
|
$ |
34,290 |
|
Subscription services revenue |
|
|
22,386 |
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
64,308 |
|
|
$ |
51,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Credit Facility
Our $25.0 million revolving credit facility expired on April 15, 2008, pursuant to its
terms. The facility had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points or Prime plus 50 basis
points, and was available for general corporate purposes (including acquisitions), subject to
certain conditions. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had no amounts outstanding and
$25.0 million available for borrowings under this revolving credit facility.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements. Certain statements
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). These statements involve a number
of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could materially affect such
forward-looking statements can be found in the section entitled Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A.
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on
February 28, 2008. Investors are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the
forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are only made as of the date hereof and we
will undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect
subsequent events or circumstances.
Overview
DealerTrack is a leading provider of on-demand software and data solutions for the
automotive and related specialty retail industries in the United States. Utilizing the Internet, we
have built a network connecting automotive dealers with banks, finance companies, credit unions and
other financing sources, and other service and information providers, such as aftermarket providers
and the major credit reporting agencies. We have established a network of active relationships in
the United States, which, as of March 31, 2008, consisted of over 22,000 automotive dealers,
including approximately 90% of all franchised dealers; over 500 financing sources, a number of
other service and information providers to the automotive retail industry. Our credit application
processing product enables dealers to automate and accelerate the indirect automotive financing
process by increasing the speed of communications between these dealers and their financing
sources. We have leveraged our leading market position in credit application processing to address
other inefficiencies in the automotive retail industry value chain. We believe our proven network
provides a competitive advantage for distribution of our software and data solutions. Our
integrated subscription-based software products and services enable our dealer customers to manage
their dealership and operations, receive valuable consumer leads, compare various financing and
leasing options and programs, sell insurance and other aftermarket products, analyze inventory,
document compliance with certain laws and execute financing contracts electronically. We have also
created efficiencies for financing source customers by providing a comprehensive digital and
electronic contracting solution. In addition, we offer data and other products and services to
various industry participants, including lease residual value and automobile configuration data.
We are a Delaware corporation formed in August 2001. We are organized as a holding
company and conduct a substantial amount of our business through our subsidiaries including
Automotive Lease Guide (alg), Inc., Arkona, Inc., DealerTrack Accessories Solutions, Inc., Chrome
Systems, Inc., DealerTrack Aftermarket Services, Inc., DealerTrack Canada, Inc., DealerTrack
Digital Services, Inc., and DealerTrack, Inc.
We monitor our performance as a business using a number of measures that are not found in
our consolidated financial statements. These measures include the number of active dealers and
financing sources in the DealerTrack network, the number of transactions processed and the number
of product subscriptions. We believe that improvements in these metrics will result in improvements
in our financial performance over time. We also view the acquisition and successful integration of
acquired companies as important milestones in the growth of our business as these acquired
companies bring new products to our customers and expand our technological capabilities. We believe
that successful acquisitions will also lead to improvements in our financial performance over time.
In the near term, however, the purchase accounting treatment of acquisitions can have a negative
impact on our net income as the depreciation and amortization expenses associated with acquired
assets, as well as particular intangibles (which tend to have a relatively short useful life), can
be substantial in the first several years following an acquisition. As a result, we monitor our
EBITDA and other business statistics as a measure of operating performance in addition to net
income and the other measures included in our consolidated financial statements.
The following is a table consisting of EBITDA and certain other business statistics that management
is continually monitoring (amounts in thousands, except active dealers, financing source data, and
product subscriptions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
for non-financial data) |
|
EBITDA and Other Business Statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (1) |
| $ |
13,344 |
|
| $ |
14,643 |
|
Capital expenditures, software and website development costs |
| $ |
2,914 |
|
| $ |
3,447 |
|
Active dealers in our network as of end of the quarter (2) |
|
|
22,457 |
|
|
|
22,642 |
|
Active financing sources in our network as of end of the quarter (3) |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Transactions processed (4) |
|
|
23,889 |
|
|
|
22,725 |
|
Product subscriptions (5) |
|
|
30,098 |
|
|
|
23,267 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA represents net income before interest (income) expense, taxes,
depreciation and amortization. We present EBITDA because we believe
that EBITDA provides useful information with respect to the
performance of our fundamental business activities and is also
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested
parties in the evaluation of comparable companies. We rely on EBITDA
as a primary measure to review and assess the operating performance of
our company and management team in connection with our executive
compensation plan incentive payments. In addition, our credit
agreement uses EBITDA (with additional adjustments), in part, to
measure our compliance with covenants such as interest coverage. |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and you should not consider it in isolation, or as
a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP). Some of these limitations are: |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal
payments, on our debts; |
|
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will
often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and |
|
|
|
|
Other companies may calculate EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
|
|
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by
relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA only supplementally. EBITDA is a measure of our performance that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. EBITDA is not a
measurement of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or
as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to net income, our most directly comparable financial measure in accordance with GAAP (in thousands). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
GAAP net income |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1,563 |
) |
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of
capitalized software and web site costs |
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
Amortization of acquired identifiable intangibles |
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (Non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
13,344 |
|
|
$ |
14,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We consider a dealer to be active as of a date if the dealer completed at least one revenue-generating credit application processing transaction using the DealerTrack network
during the most recently ended calendar month. |
|
(3) |
|
We consider a financing source to be active in our network as of a date if it is accepting credit application data electronically from dealers in the DealerTrack network. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents revenue-generating transactions processed in the DealerTrack, DealerTrack Digital Services and DealerTrack Canada networks at the end of a given period. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents revenue-generating subscriptions in the DealerTrack or DealerTrack Canada networks at the end of a given period. |
Revenue
Transaction Services Revenue. Transaction services revenue includes revenue earned from
our financing source customers for each credit application that dealers submit to them. We also
earn transaction services revenue from financing source customers for each financing contract
executed via our electronic contracting and digital contract processing solutions, as well as for
any portfolio residual value analyses we perform for them. We also earn transaction services
revenue from dealers or other service and information providers, such as aftermarket providers,
vehicle sales lead distributors, and credit report providers, for each fee-bearing product accessed
by dealers.
15
Subscription Services Revenue. Subscription services revenue includes revenue earned
from our customers (typically on a monthly basis) for use of our subscription or license-based
products and services. Some of these subscription services enable dealer customers to manage their
dealership data and operations, obtain valuable consumer leads, compare various financing and
leasing options and programs, sell insurance and other aftermarket products, analyze inventory, and
execute financing contracts electronically.
Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue primarily consists of expenses related to running our
network infrastructure (including Internet connectivity and data storage), amortization expense on
acquired intangible assets, compensation and related benefits for network and technology
development personnel, amounts paid to third parties pursuant to contracts under which a portion of
certain revenue is owed to those third parties (revenue share), direct costs (printing, binding,
and delivery) associated with our residual value guides, installation and hardware costs associated
with our dealership management system product offering, allocated overhead and amortization
associated with capitalization of software.
Product Development Expenses. Product development expenses consist primarily of
compensation and related benefits, consulting fees, and other operating expenses associated with
our product development departments. The product development departments perform research and
development, as well as enhance and maintain existing products.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses consist primarily of compensation and related benefits, facility costs, and professional
services fees for our sales, marketing, customer service and administrative functions.
We
allocate overhead such as occupancy and telecommunications charges, and
depreciation expense to all departments based on headcount, as we believe this to be the most
accurate measure. As a result, a portion of general overhead expenses is reflected in our cost of
revenue and each operating expense category.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments that affect the amounts reported for assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the
disclosure of contingent liabilities.
Our critical accounting policies are those that we believe are both important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that involve difficult,
subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect
of matters that are inherently uncertain. The estimates are based on historical experience and on
various assumptions about the ultimate outcome of future events. Our actual results may differ from
these estimates in the event unforeseen events occur or should the assumptions used in the
estimation process differ from actual results. Management believes there have been no material
changes during the three months ended March 31, 2008 to the critical accounting policies discussed
in the section entitled Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the
SEC on February 28, 2008.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the selected consolidated
statements of operations data expressed as a percentage of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(% of net revenue) |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
Product development |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
41.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
|
86.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
(6.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Revenue
Total net revenue increased $12.6 million, or 24%, to $64.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 from $51.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Transaction Services Revenue. Transaction services revenue increased $3.9 million, or
11%, to $38.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $34.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of a 5% increase in the volume
of transactions processed through our network to 23.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008 from 22.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, driven by a 46% increase in
financing source customers active in our network to 503 as of March 31, 2008 from 344 as of
March 31, 2007, and an increase in the average transaction price to $1.60 as of March 31, 2008 from
$1.51 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Included in the $3.9 million increase is $0.9
million related to acquisitions.
Subscription Services Revenue. Subscription services revenue increased $6.6 million, or
42%, to $22.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $15.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in revenue from our subscription products was primarily
the result of the 29% increase in total subscriptions to 30,098 as of March 31, 2008 from 23,267 as
of March 31, 2007, coupled with an increase in the average subscription price to $251 as of March
31, 2008 from $234 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Included in the $6.6 million increase
is $2.9 million related to acquisitions.
Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue increased $7.3 million, or 34%, to $28.6 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $21.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The $7.3 million increase was primarily the result of increased amortization and depreciation
charges of $2.4 million primarily relating to the acquired identifiable intangibles from our 2007
acquisitions of Arkona, AutoStyleMart, Curomax, and the acquisition of certain assets from Manheim
Auctions, coupled with increased compensation and related benefit costs of $2.3 million and
increased occupancy and telecommunications costs of $0.2 million due to overall headcount additions
including those from acquired companies and salary increases, $0.7 million of technology expense,
$0.9 million in cost of revenue from the Arkona business and $0.4 million in cost of revenue from
our digital contract business.
Product Development Expenses. Product development expenses increased $0.7 million, or
32%, to $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $2.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The $0.7 million increase was primarily a result of increased
compensation and related benefit costs of $0.6 million due to overall headcount additions and
salary increases.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $8.5 million, or 40%, to $29.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
from $21.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The $8.5 million increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses was primarily the result of increased compensation and related
benefit costs of approximately $3.1 million due to headcount additions and salary increases,
$3.0 million in increased professional fees related primarily to pending litigation, $1.1 million
in increased non-cash stock-based compensation expense due to additional stock options and
restricted common stock awards granted since March 31, 2007, $0.5 million related to increased bad debt
expense, $0.2 million related to increased marketing and travel expenses, and $0.2 million in
increased occupancy and telecommunications expenses.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of $1.9 million
consisted primarily of $1.0 million of federal tax, $0.2 million of state and local income taxes,
and $0.7 million of tax expense for our Canadian subsidiary. The provision for income taxes for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 of $3.4 million consisted primarily of $2.9 million of
federal tax and $0.5 million of state and local income taxes, and $0.2 million of tax expense for
our Canadian subsidiaries. Included in tax expense for our Canadian
subsidiary for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007 is $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for a
permanent item relating to intangible amortization. These amounts
have a 7.7% and a 2.4% impact on the effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity requirements will continue to be for working capital, acquisitions, capital
expenditures and general corporate purposes. Our capital expenditures, software and web site
development costs for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $2.9 million, of which
$2.6 million was in cash. We expect to finance our future liquidity needs through working capital
and cash flows from operations, however future acquisitions or other strategic initiatives may require us to incur or seek additional
financing. As of March 31, 2008, we had no amounts outstanding under our available $25.0 million
revolving credit facility, which expired on April 15, 2008.
17
As
of March 31, 2008, we had $206.7 million of cash and cash
equivalents, $18.2 million in non-current
investments and $216.6 million in working capital, as compared
to $50.6 million of cash and cash
equivalents, $169.6 million in short-term investments and $222.8 million in working capital as of December 31,
2007.
Reductions
in interest rates could materially impact our interest income and may
negatively impact future reported operating results and earnings per
share.
The following table sets forth the cash flow components for the following periods (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
8,983 |
|
|
$ |
5,458 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
146,902 |
|
|
|
(21,845 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
primarily attributable to net income of $2.3 million, which includes depreciation and amortization
of $10.5 million, amortization of stock-based compensation of $3.5 million, an increase to the
provision for doubtful accounts and sales credits of $1.5 million, and an increase to deferred revenue and other current
liabilities of $0.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable
and accrued expenses of $7.8 million, a deferred tax benefit of $0.5 million, a
stock-based compensation windfall tax benefit of $0.1 million, and an increase in accounts
receivable of $1.8 million due to an overall increase in revenue. Net cash provided by operating
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily attributable to net income of
$4.8 million, which includes depreciation and amortization of $7.8 million, amortization of
stock-based compensation of $2.1 million, an increase to the provision for doubtful accounts and
sales credits of $1.0 million, and an increase to deferred revenue and other current liabilities of
$0.9 million, partially offset by a deferred tax benefit of $2.1 million, a stock-based
compensation windfall tax benefit of $1.1 million, an increase in accounts receivable of
$3.1 million due to an overall increase in revenue, and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued
expenses of $5.8 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
primarily attributable to the net sale of short-term investments of $151.1 million offset by
capital expenditures of $1.0 million, an expenditure of capitalized software and web site
development costs of $1.5 million, and the payment for net assets acquired of $1.6 million. Net
cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily
attributable to capital expenditures of $0.8 million, an increase in capitalized software and web
site development costs of $1.0 million, and payment for net assets acquired of $37.8 million,
offset by the net sale of short-term investments of $17.8 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
primarily attributable to the net proceeds received from employee stock purchases under our
employee stock purchase plan of $0.7 million, the exercise of employee stock options of
$0.4 million and stock-based compensation windfall tax benefit of $0.1 million, offset by principal
payments on capital lease obligations of $0.5 million. Net cash provided by financing activities
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily attributable to the exercise of employee
stock options of $0.8 million, net proceeds received from employee stock purchases under our
employee stock purchase plan of $0.4 million and stock-based compensation windfall tax benefit of
$1.1 million.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2008, there were no material changes in our contractual obligations as
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, except for the
inventory purchase agreement entered into on January 30, 2008. Under the terms of the inventory
purchase agreement we agreed to purchase 2,000 ePad units for approximately $0.3 million. As of
March 31, 2008, we have only received 120 units.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or
special purpose entities, which are typically established for the purpose of facilitating
off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Industry Trends
The number of dealers
serviced and the level of indirect financing by our participating
financing source customers, and the volume of new
and used automobiles financed or leased, special promotions by automobile manufacturers and the level of
indirect financing by captive finance companies not available in our network impact our business. Our business may be affected by
these and other economical, seasonal and promotional trends in the indirect automotive finance
market.
18
Effects of Inflation
Our monetary assets, consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents, long-term
investments and receivables, and our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of intangible assets
and goodwill, which are not affected significantly by inflation. We believe that replacement costs
of equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements will not materially affect our operations.
However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, which may not be readily recoverable in the
prices of products and services we offer.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency Exposure
We only have operations located in, and provide services to, customers in the United
States and Canada. Our earnings are affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as
compared with the Canadian dollar. Our exposure is mitigated, in part, by the fact that we incur
certain operating costs in the same foreign currency in which revenue is denominated. The foreign
currency exposure that does exist is limited by the fact that the majority of transactions are paid
according to our standard payment terms, which are generally short-term in nature.
Interest Rate Exposure
As of March 31, 2008, we had cash, cash equivalents and non-current investments of $225.0
million invested in money market instruments and tax-exempt and tax advantaged preferred stock
trust securities. Such investments are subject to interest rate and credit risk. Our policy of
investing in securities with original maturities of three months or
less minimizes our interest and credit risk. As of March 31, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding
under our revolving credit facility. Any borrowings under our revolving credit facility would bear
interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 1.5% or Prime plus 0.5%. On April 15,
2008, our revolving credit facility expired pursuant to its terms.
As of March 31, 2008, approximately $18.2 million of our investment portfolio consisted
primarily of state and local government, universities, utilities and preferred stock trust
securities. If the issuers of these securities are unable to successfully complete future auctions
or refinance their obligations and their credit ratings deteriorate, we may be required to adjust
the carrying value of these securities and recognize an impairment charge for an
other-than-temporary decline in fair value. As of March 31, 2008 we have $0.3 million in unrealized
losses. We believe that we will be able to liquidate our investment without material loss and that
these securities are not permanently impaired, however due to the uncertainty of whether we will be
able to sell these securities within the next year, we have reclassified them to long-term at March
31, 2008. Based on our available cash and other investments, we do not currently anticipate that
the lack of liquidity caused by failed auctions, if any, related to these securities will have a
material adverse effect on our operating cash flows or will affect our ability to operate our
business as usual.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e) under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating our disclosure
controls and procedures, we and our management recognize that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that they believe that, as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
19
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to litigation matters arising in connection with the
normal course of our business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition to the litigation matters arising in connection with the normal course of our business,
we are party to the litigation described below.
DealerTrack Inc. v. RouteOne LLC
On January 28, 2004, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against RouteOne LLC
(RouteOne) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Civil Action
No. CV 04-322 (SJF). The complaint seeks injunctive relief as well as damages against RouteOne for
infringement of two patents owned by us, which relate to computer implemented automated credit
application analysis and decision routing inventions (the Patents). The complaint also seeks relief
for RouteOnes acts of copyright infringement, circumvention of technological measures and common
law fraud and unfair competition.
The court has approved a joint stipulation of dismissal with respect to this action. Pursuant
to the joint stipulation, the patent count has been dismissed without prejudice to be pursued as
part of the below consolidated actions and all other counts have been dismissed with prejudice.
DealerTrack, Inc. v. Finance Express et al., CV-06-2335;
DealerTrack Inc. v. RouteOne and Finance Express et al., CV-06-6864; and
DealerTrack Inc. v. RouteOne and Finance Express et al., CV-07-215
On April 18, 2006, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against David Huber,
Finance Express , and three of their unnamed dealer customers in the United States District Court
for the Central District of California, Civil Action No. CV-06-2335 AG (FMOx). The complaint seeks
declaratory and injunctive relief as well as damages against the defendants for infringement of the
Patents. We are also seeking relief for acts of copyright infringement and unfair competition.
On June 8, 2006, David Huber and Finance Express filed their answer and counterclaims.
The counterclaims seek damages for libel related to an allegation in the complaint, breach of
contract, deceit, actual and constructive fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair
competition related to a confidentiality agreement between the parties. On October 26, 2006, the
Court dismissed the counterclaim for libel pursuant to a motion by us.
On October 27, 2006, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against RouteOne LLC,
David Huber and Finance Express in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California, Civil Action No. CV-06-06864 (SJF). The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as damages against the defendants for infringement of the Patents. On November 28,
2006 and December 4, 2006, respectively, defendants RouteOne, David Huber and Finance Express filed
their answers. Finance Express also asserted counterclaims for breach of contract, deceit, actual
and constructive fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition related to a
confidentiality agreement between Finance Express and us.
On February 20, 2007, we filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against RouteOne
LLC, David Huber and Finance Express in the United States District Court for the Central District
of California, Civil Action No. CV-07-215 (CWx). The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as damages against the defendants for infringement of U. S. Pat. No. 7,181,427 (the
427 Patent). On April 13, 2007 and April 17, 2007, respectively, defendants RouteOne, David Huber
and Finance Express filed their answers. RouteOne, David Huber and Finance Express asserted
counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of unenforceability due to inequitable conduct with
respect to the 427 Patent and the Patents. David Huber and Finance Express also asserted
counterclaims for breach of contract, deceit, actual and constructive fraud, misappropriation of
trade secrets and unfair competition related to a confidentiality agreement between Finance Express
and us.
The DealerTrack, Inc. v. Finance Express et al., CV-06-2335 action, the DealerTrack Inc.
v. RouteOne and Finance Express et al., CV-06-6864 action and the DealerTrack v. RouteOne and
Finance Express et al., CV-07-215 action, described above, have been consolidated by the Court. A
hearing on claims construction, referred to as a Markman hearing, was held on September 25, 2007.
A decision in the Markman hearing has not yet been issued. Fact and expert discovery are completed
and the parties are in the process of preparing motions for summary judgment and preparing for
trial. Trial of this action is scheduled to begin on July 22, 2008.
We intend to pursue our claims and defend any counter claims vigorously.
We believe that the potential liability from all current litigations will not have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations when resolved in a future
period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the factors discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors in Part I,
Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which was filed
with the SEC on February 28, 2008, that could materially affect our business, financial condition
or results of operations. The risks described in that Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only
risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known
to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or results of operations.
20
There have been no material changes in our risk
factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, except as set forth below.
Funds associated with certain of our auction rate securities may not be accessible for in excess of
12 months and our auction rate securities may experience an other than temporary decline in value,
which would adversely affect our income.
As
of March 31, 2008, approximately $18.2 million of our investment portfolio consisted
primarily of state and local government, universities and utilities auction rate securities. These
securities have come up for auction and the auctions have failed. As of March 31, 2008, we have
$0.3 million in unrealized losses related to these securities. Although we believe that the
decline in the fair market value of these securities is temporary, there is a risk that the decline
in value may ultimately be deemed to be other than temporary. In the future, should we determine
that the decline in value of these auction rate securities is other than temporary, it would result
in a loss being recognized in our statement of operations, which could be material. The funds
associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs, a buyer
is found outside of the auction process or the underlying securities have matured. As a result, we
have classified those securities with failed auctions as long-term assets in our consolidated
balance sheet. Based on our available cash and other investments, we do not currently anticipate
that the lack of liquidity caused by failed auctions related to these securities will have a
material adverse effect on our operating cash flows or will affect our ability to operate our
business as usual.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
From time to time, in connection with the vesting of restricted common stock under our
Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Award Plan, we may receive shares of our common stock from
certain restricted common stockholders in consideration of the tax withholdings due upon the
vesting of restricted common stock. Additionally, on March 18, 2008, the board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we
may spend up to $75 million to repurchase our common stock. Stock repurchases under this program
may be made on the open market, through 10b5-1 programs, or in privately negotiated transactions in
accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. The transactions may be made from time
to time without prior notice and in such amounts as management deems appropriate and will be funded
from cash on hand. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of repurchases will be
based on several factors, including the price of our common stock, legal or regulatory
requirements, general business and market conditions, and other investment opportunities. The stock
repurchase program will expire on March 31, 2009, but may be limited or terminated at any time by
the Board of Directors without prior notice. There were no repurchases under this program for the
three months ended March 31, 2008.
The following table sets forth the repurchases for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
That |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
May Yet be |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Announced |
|
Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Program |
|
Program |
January 2008 |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
$ |
32.15 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
February 2008 |
|
|
705 |
|
|
$ |
23.39 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
March 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Up to $75 million of our common stock may be purchased under
this program. |
21
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
10.1 (1) |
|
Amendment No. 3, dated March 19, 2008, to the Credit
Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, among the Registrant,
the Lenders party therto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Mark F. ONeil, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2
|
|
Certification of Robert J. Cox III, Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications, of Mark F. ONeil, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Robert J. Cox III, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2008, which was filed on March 20, 2008. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 8, 2008
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Cox III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Cox III |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
10.1 (1) |
|
Amendment No. 3, dated March 19, 2008, to the Credit
Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, among the Registrant,
the Lenders party therto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Mark F. ONeil, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Robert J. Cox III, Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications, of Mark F. ONeil, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Robert J. Cox III, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2008, which was filed on March 20, 2008. |
22