FORM
20-F
| (Mark one) | o | REGISTRATION
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| OR | x | ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended | 31 December 2002 | |
| OR | o | TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________ |
| Commission file number | 1-10306 |
The
Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc
Scotland
42 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YE United Kingdom
Scotland
42 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YE United Kingdom
| Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. | ||
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| American Depositary Shares Series B*, C*, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and K, each representing one Non-Cumulative Dollar Preference Share, Series B*, C*, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and K, respectively | New York Stock Exchange | |
| Exchangeable Capital Securities, Series A | New York Stock Exchange | |
| Non-Cumulative Dollar Preference Shares** | New York Stock Exchange | |
| Dollar Perpetual Regulatory tier one securities, Series 1 | New York Stock Exchange | |
| *Redeemed on 30 January 2003 | ||
| ** Issuable upon exchange of the Exchangeable Capital Securities | ||
| Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. | ||
| None | ||
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Non-cumulative convertible dollar preference shares - Series 1 to 3
Guarantee, relating to 10.125% Guaranteed Capital Notes Due 2004 of RBSG Capital Corporation:
Payment of Principal and Interest Guaranteed on a Subordinated Basis by The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (suspended)
Ordinary shares of 25 pence each
7.375% Reset Capital Securities
6.40% Subordinated Notes due 1 April 2009
6.375% Subordinated Notes due 1 February 2011
5% Subordinated Notes due 1 October 2014
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
| Ordinary shares of 25 pence each | 2,900,861,071 | Non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series B to K* | 106,000,000 | |
| Additional Value Shares | 2,660,556,304 | Non-cumulative convertible dollar preference shares, Series 1 to 3 | 1,900,000 | |
| 11% cumulative preference shares | 500,000 | Non-cumulative convertible euro preference shares, Series 1 | 750,000 | |
| 5 ½% cumulative preference shares | 400,000 | Non-cumulative convertible sterling preference shares, Series 1 | 200,000 | |
| *8,000,000 Series B and 16,000,000 Series C were redeemed on 30 January 2003 | ||||
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. | ||||
| x | YES | o | NO | |
| Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. | o | Item 17 | x | Item 18 |
 |
| Report and Accounts 2002 |
| Incorporating the Annual Report on Form 20-F |
| Contents |
||
| Presentation of information | ||
| Forward-looking statements | ||
| 1 | Financial highlights | |
| 2 | Chairman's statement | |
| 4 | Group Chief Executive's review | |
| 6 | Description of business | |
| 10 | Operating and financial review | |
| 10 | Critical accounting policies | |
| 10 | Accounting developments | |
| 13 | Overview of results | |
| 19 | Analysis of results | |
| 27 | Divisional performance | |
| 44 | Integration information | |
| 46 | Overview of balance sheet | |
| 48 | Cash flow | |
| 49 | UK GAAP compared with US GAAP | |
| 49 | Capital resources | |
| 50 | Risk management | |
| 72 | Board of directors and secretary | |
| 74 | Report of the directors | |
| 78 | Corporate governance | |
| 80 | Directors' remuneration report | |
| 90 | Directors' interests in shares | |
| 91 | Statement of directors' responsibilities | |
| 92 | Independent auditors’ report to the members of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc | |
| 93 | Accounting policies | |
| 96 | Consolidated profit and loss account | |
| 98 | Consolidated balance sheet | |
| 100 | Statement of consolidated total recognised gains and losses | |
| 100 | Reconciliation of movements in consolidated shareholders’ funds | |
| 101 | Consolidated cash flow statement | |
| 102 | Balance sheet – the company | |
| 103 | Notes on the accounts | |
| 155 | Five year financial summary | |
| 162 | Additional information | |
| 167 | Principal offices | |
| 168 | Shareholder information | |
| 182 | SEC Form 20-F cross reference guide | |
| 184 | Glossary |
| Presentation of information |
| This report comprises the Report and Accounts of the company for the year ended 31 December 2002 and includes the information the company is required to provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in the United States on Form 20-F. |
| For the purposes of this report, and unless specified otherwise, the term ‘company’ means The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, ‘RBS’ or the ‘Group’ means the company and its subsidiary undertakings, ‘the Royal Bank’ means The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and ‘NatWest’ means National Westminster Bank Plc. |
| The company publishes its financial statements in pounds sterling (“£” or “sterling”). The abbreviations ‘£m’ and ‘£bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of pounds sterling, respectively, and references to ‘pence’ represent pence in the United Kingdom (“UK”). Reference to ‘dollars’ or ‘$’ are to United States of America (“US”) dollars. The abbreviations ‘$m’ and ‘$bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of dollars, respectively, and references to ‘cents’ represent cents in the US. The abbreviation ‘€’ represents the ‘euro’, the European single currency and the abbreviations ‘€m’ and ‘€bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of euros, respectively. |
| Certain information in this report is presented separately for domestic and foreign activities. Domestic activities primarily consist of UK domestic transactions of the Group. Foreign activities comprise the Group’s transactions conducted through those offices in the UK specifically organised to service international banking transactions and transactions conducted through offices outside the UK. |
| The geographic analysis in the average balance sheet and interest rates, changes in net interest income and average interest rates, yields, spreads and margins in this report have been compiled on the basis of location of office – UK and Overseas. Management believe that presentation on this basis provides more useful information on the yields, spreads and margins of the Group’s activities than would be provided by presentation on the basis of the domestic and foreign activities analysis used elsewhere in this report as it more closely reflects the basis on which the Group is managed. ‘UK’ in this context includes domestic transactions and transactions conducted through the offices in the UK which service international banking transactions. |
| The Group distinguishes its trading from non-trading activities by determining whether a business unit’s principal activity is trading or non-trading and then attributing all of that unit’s activities to one portfolio or the other. Although this method may result in some non-trading activity being classified as trading, and vice versa, the Group believes that any resulting misclassification is not material. |
| In this report, the terms ‘UK GAAP’ and ‘US GAAP’ refer to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the UK and the US respectively. |
| Forward-looking
statements Certain sections in this document contain ‘forward-looking statements’ as that term is defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements that include the words ‘consider’, ‘expect’, ‘estimate’, ‘project’, ‘anticipate’, ‘should’, ‘intend’, ‘plan’, ‘probability’, ‘risk’, ‘Value-at-Risk (“VaR”), ‘target’, ‘goal’, ‘objective’, ‘will’, ‘endeavour’, ‘outlook’ and similar expressions or variations on such expressions and sections such as ‘Chairman’s statement’, ‘Group Chief Executive’s review’, ‘Operating and financial review – Overview of results – Integration’, ‘Integration information’ and ‘Trend information’. |
| In particular,this document includes forward-looking statements relating,but not limited, to the Group’s potential exposures to various types of market risks, such as interest rate risk, foreign exchange rate risk and commodity and equity price risk. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. For example, certain of the market risk disclosures are dependent on choices about key model characteristics and assumptions and are subject to various limitations. By their nature, certain of the market risk disclosures are only estimates and, as a result, actual future gains and losses could differ materially from those that have been estimated. |
| Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by the forward-looking statements contained in this document include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in the UK and in other countries in which the Group has significant business activities or investments, including the United States; the monetary and interest rate policies of the Bank of England, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and other G-7 central banks; inflation; deflation; unanticipated turbulence in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices; changes in UK and foreign laws, regulations and taxes; changes in competition and pricing environments; natural and other disasters; the inability to hedge certain risks economically; the adequacy of loss reserves; acquisitions or restructurings; technological changes; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Group in managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
| The forward-looking statements contained in this document speak only as of the date of this report, and the Group does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. |
| For a further discussion of certain risks faced by the Group,see Risk factors on page 9. |
page 1
| Financial highlights |
 |
 |
 |
|
Profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs (£m) The Group's profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs rose by 12% to £6,451 million. |
Adjusted earnings per share (pence) Earnings per share, adjusted for goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the dividend on the Additional Value Shares increased by 13% to 144.1p. |
Dividend per ordinary share (pence) The directors have recommended a final dividend of 31.0p which, when added to the interim dividend of 12.7p, makes a total for the year of 43.7p, an increase of 15%. |
| Pro forma | |||||
| 2002 | 2001(2) | 2000(1,2) | 2000(2) | ||
| for the year ended 31 December | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| Profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs | 6,451 | 5,778 | 4,401 | 3,896 | |
| Profit before tax | 4,763 | 4,252 | 3,327 | 2,970 | |
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,768 | 1,572 | |
| Cost:income ratio (%) (3) | 45.6 | 47.0 | 53.5 | 53.1 | |
| Basic earnings per share (pence) | 68.4 | 67.6 | 66.5 | 66.9 | |
| Adjusted earnings per share (pence) (4) | 144.1 | 127.9 | 101.8 | 101.2 | |
| Dividend cover (times) (5) | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.7 | |
| 2002 | 2001(2) | 2000(2) | |||
| at 31 December | £m | £m | £m | ||
| Total assets | 412,000 | 368,859 | 320,069 | ||
| Loans and advances to customers | 223,324 | 190,492 | 168,076 | ||
| Shareholders’ funds | 27,052 | 26,668 | 22,999 | ||
| Risk asset ratio – tier 1 (%) | 7.3 | 7.1 | 6.9 | ||
| – total (%) | 11.7 | 11.5 | 11.5 | ||
(1) |
Notes: On a pro forma basis (see page 13). |
| (2) | Restated for the implementation of FRS 19 and the issuance of UITF 33. Details are set out on page 10. |
| (3) | Cost:income ratio represents operating expenses excluding goodwill amortisation and integration costs expressed as a percentage of total income. |
| (4) | Adjusted earnings per share is based on earnings per share adjusted for goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the Additional Value Shares dividend. |
| (5) | Dividend cover represents the total ordinary dividend expressed as a multiple of profit attributable to ordinary shareholders adjusted for goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the Additional Value Shares dividend. |
| To facilitate comparisons, the financial information and commentaries on the Group and divisional performances in the Operating and financial review are compared with the pro forma results for 2000, which have been prepared on the basis described on page 13, and with the statutory results for 2000. |
| page 2 | Chairman's statement |
| In 2002 the Group continued to make good progress. The undoubted highlight was the completion of the NatWest IT integration on to the Royal Bank platform. This project – one of the largest integration projects ever undertaken worldwide – was completed ahead of schedule, with benefits well in excess of those promised to shareholders during the bid for NatWest. |
| In the US, the Mellon Regional Franchise was successfully integrated on to the Citizens platform, and again the project was completed ahead of schedule. The success of both these integration projects was a result of good planning, teamwork and sheer hard work on the part of our staff. |
| On a range of key measures of success including income, profitability, customer numbers, credit quality and return on capital the Group continues to perform well. This is particularly pleasing given that 2002 was by any standard a challenging year. |
| Financial
performance Profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs was up 12% to £6,451 million (2001 – £5,778 million). Total income grew by 16% to £16,815 million. Our cost:income ratio has again fallen, to 45.6%, down from 47.0% last year, as a result of our strong growth in income, tight control of our cost base and delivery of the benefits from integration. Adjusted earnings per share rose by 13% to 144.1p. |
| Dividend The Board has recommended a final dividend for the year of 31.0p which, with the interim dividend of 12.7p, makes a total of 43.7p, an increase of 15%. Our second Additional Value Share dividend of 30.0p was paid on 2 December 2002. |
| Staff
profit sharing The staff profit share for the year has been set at 10% of basic salaries, reflecting the overall strong financial performance of the Group. |
| Business
developments During 2002 we purchased Dixon Motors PLC which, as one of the UK’s largest car dealerships, complements Lombard’s existing activities. Direct Line continued its European expansion with the acquisition in Italy of the direct insurance business of Royal Insurance from Royal & Sun Alliance. Citizens Bank announced two further acquisitions in the past year, Medford Bancorp and Commonwealth Bancorp, making it the 17th largest bank by deposits in the US. |
| Board
of directors We were deeply saddened by the death of Viscount Younger of Leckie on 26th January 2003. Viscount Younger was an outstanding Chairman of the Group over 10 years which saw unparalleled growth and development, culminating in the takeover of NatWest. The business achievements of the Group during that time very much reflect the personal qualities and attributes he brought to the role: he inspired loyalty and warmth amongst his colleagues, as well as providing the Group with vision and leadership of the highest order. |
| On 1 June 2002, we appointed Colin Buchan as a non-executive director. Colin has spent most of his professional career with UBS Warburg from where he retired as Global Head of Equities. |
| Having participated in the Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive Directors undertaken by Derek Higgs during 2002, we are considering his recommendations to ensure that we continue to apply the highest standards of governance. |
page 3
| Economic
outlook While the UK economy is not as strong as it was 12 months ago, we do expect a moderate improvement in growth throughout 2003. Activity in the UK is underpinned by consumer and government spending, which seem set to continue. We expect to see the UK among the best performing industrialised nations again this year. The US economy has made steady progress after the traumas of 2001, aided by a substantial policy stimulus. The gradual improvement should continue in 2003, but the US economy is unlikely to achieve trend growth until next year. |
| That said, we are clearly in a period of heightened geopolitical and economic risk, which has resulted in increased volatility on many fronts. This continues to colour the sense of optimism which we would otherwise feel on the strength of the underlying fundamentals in the economies in which we principally operate. |
| Prospects We remain focussed on building strategic options for the Group and growing income in ways which will provide value for our shareholders, customers and staff. I am confident that the strength, diversity and flexibility of the Group provides us with an excellent platform to build value in the future. |
| Sir
George Mathewson Chairman |
| page 4 | Group Chief Executive's review |
| The Group continued to make good progress both financially and operationally during 2002. As a result, we increased our Group profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs by 12%, adjusted earnings per share by 13% and our dividend per share by 15%. |
| Our business model recognises that, to deliver superior sustainable value to our shareholders, we need to do the same for our customers and our people. |
| Our
customers All divisions of the Group increased their customer numbers during 2002, arguably the clearest evidence that we are delivering value for our customers. Our divisions achieved consistently good results in various surveys of customer satisfaction, and won a number of awards for customer service. For example, in the important area of small businesses, NatWest was voted “Best Bank that I would recommend to a small business” in the NOP Opinion Formers Survey, while The Royal Bank of Scotland won the award for “Best Small Business Bank” from the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. |
| Notwithstanding these pleasing results, there is, as always, no room for complacency and we continue to strive for improvements. |
| Our
people As ever, the success of the Group is only made possible by the efforts and achievements of our people. Each year, a survey is carried out by the independent firm International Survey Research, which evaluates employee opinion under a number of criteria and relative to various external benchmarks. The response rate to the latest survey was our best ever at 83%, significantly higher than the response rate of 75% to the previous survey. |
| The latest survey shows that we have further improved our performance from the very good level achieved in the last survey and continue to perform as well as a number of the world’s best companies. I am also pleased to report that we are again ahead of the UK financial services sector in every category and improved our performance relative to both the global financial services and global high performance norms. |
| Our
shareholders To create value for our shareholders, we concentrate on the simple fundamentals of growing our income and improving our efficiency, whilst disciplining ourselves to retain a bias away from activities and geographies which may bring undue volatility to our results. |
| During 2002 we grew income across the Group as a whole by 16%. Income growth was particularly strong in Citizens, Direct Line and Retail Direct. This growth was supported by increased customer numbers and business volumes: the Group’s net interest margin remained stable at 3.1% (2001 – 3.1%). A more detailed review of the performance of our individual businesses is outlined later in this document. |
| In addition to growing its income, the Group improved its efficiency in 2002. On a comparable basis, the Group cost:income ratio improved further to 45.0% (2001 – 47.0%), and to 45.6% including acquisitions, a level that keeps us at the forefront of efficiency when compared to similar banks in the UK and internationally. This represents a substantial improvement since 1999, when the pro forma cost:income ratio for the enlarged Group, including NatWest, was almost 60%. |
| Provisions for bad debts were higher in 2002 than in 2001, reflecting the deterioration in the short-term economic environment. However, during 2002, provisions continued at a rate consistent with the second half of 2001 and the growth in our loan portfolio. As ever we remain focussed on ensuring that our balance sheet carries adequate provision for bad debts and our provision coverage remains at 81% of risk elements in lending. |
| Integration The large and complex NatWest IT integration was completed successfully in October 2002, several months ahead of schedule. In recognition of this outstanding achievement, an integration bonus amounting to 5% of salary was paid to all employees whose business units were involved in integration. |
| Last year we announced increased targets for annual transaction benefits amounting to £2,030 million (formerly £1,730 million). These transaction benefits had been fully implemented by February 2003, although their full impact will not show through to profits until 2004. |
| Our achievements in integration are without doubt one of the principal highlights of the last year. It would however, be a pity if the successful integration were to obscure the strong underlying organic growth which took as much planning, teamwork and effort to be achieved. |
page 5
| Review
of divisions Corporate Banking and Financial Markets increased its contribution before manufacturing costs by 6% to £3,203 million (2001 – £3,024 million). Corporate Banking and Financial Markets maintained leading positions in the UK in corporate lending, leasing, deposits, payments, derivatives and foreign exchange and across a wide range of specialised corporate banking activities. Outside the UK, the division achieved good growth in Continental Europe through its offices in Paris, Frankfurt, Milan and Madrid. In the US, the division improved its already strong position in US treasuries and asset-backed securities. |
| Retail Banking increased its contribution before manufacturing costs by 8% to £3,019 million (2001 – £2,807 million). Retail Banking increased its total personal customers by 3% to 13.1 million (2001 – 12.7 million) and total small business customers by 3% to 1.1 million. Both The Royal Bank of Scotland and NatWest achieved good growth in current accounts, including packaged current accounts, mortgages, personal loans and deposits and small business loans and deposits. NatWest maintained its market leading position for small business relationships. |
| Retail Direct increased its contribution before manufacturing costs by 27% to £701 million (2001 – £551 million). Retail Direct increased its credit card accounts by 4% to 9.5 million (2001 – 9.1 million), while increasing both credit card balances and fee income associated with these accounts. Tesco Personal Finance grew its customer account base by 29% to 3.4 million (2001 – 2.6 million). The One account’s (formerly Virgin One) average mortgage balances increased by 36% to £4.3 billion (2001 – £3.1 billion). |
| Manufacturing costs increased by 7% to £1,682 million (2001 – £1,568 million). Within this amount, technology costs were up by 5% to £662 million (2001 – £632 million) and customer support and other operations were also up by 5% to £492 million (2001 – £469 million), both reflecting increased volumes and scope across a wide range of activities. Manufacturing completed the conversion of NatWest systems on to the RBS IT platform in October 2002, some months ahead of the original target. |
| Wealth Management contribution declined by 6% to £432 million (2001 – £459 million), principally due to reduced fee income reflecting lower stock market values. However, Coutts, which is investing in its UK regional branch network, increased its total customer base by 5% to over 75,000. Offshore Banking launched a new expatriate service offering a full range of banking and investment services. |
| Direct Line Group increased its contribution by 36% to £355 million (2001 – £261 million). Direct Line Group increased its UK motor insurance policies (including those sold through Tesco Personal Finance) by 16%, to 4.7 million (2001 – 4.0 million) and its UK home insurance policies by 17%, to 1.6 million (2001 – 1.4 million). In Continental Europe, Direct Line businesses in Spain, Italy and Germany doubled their total policy numbers to 1.2 million (2001– 0.6 million). |
| Ulster Bank increased its contribution by 7% to £244 million (2001 – £229 million). Ulster Bank increased its personal current accounts by 5% and business current accounts by 2%, mainly in the Republic of Ireland. During the year Ulster Bank completed its transformation programme, Project Horizon, which was designed to increase focus on customers across its branch network. |
| Citizens increased its contribution by 53% to £766 million (2001 – £501 million). Citizens increased its personal customer base by 13% to 2.0 million (2001 – 1.8 million), partly by increasing its distribution capacity through supermarkets. Citizens also increased its business customers by 6% to 197,000 (2001 – 185,000). In August 2002, Citizens successfully completed the conversion to its own systems of Mellon Financial Corporation’s regional banking franchise. Citizens also acquired Medford Bancorp, New England – completing conversion in December 2002 – and announced the acquisition of Commonwealth Bancorp, Pennsylvania in September 2002. |
| Outlook International uncertainty inevitably casts something of a shadow over an otherwise reasonable prognosis for the key economies in which we operate. Whilst we have no particular insights as to how events might unfold, it is clear that the strength, diversity and flexibility of our Group present many options for future growth not only in the UK, but also in the US and in Continental Europe. |
| By continuing to focus on the fundamentals of credit quality, income growth and improving efficiency, we are confident that we can continue to deliver superior sustainable value to our shareholders, our customers and our people. |
| Fred
Goodwin Group Chief Executive |
| page 6 | Description of business |
| Introduction The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc is the holding company of one of the world’s largest banking and financial services groups, with a market capitalisation of £43 billion at the end of 2002. Headquartered in Edinburgh, the Group operates in the UK and internationally through its two principal subsidiaries, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (“the Royal Bank”), and National Westminster Bank Plc (“NatWest”), which it acquired on 6 March 2000. Both the Royal Bank and NatWest are major UK clearing banks whose origins go back over 275 years. The Group has a large and diversified customer base and provides a wide range of products and services to personal, commercial and large corporate and institutional customers. |
| The Group had total assets of £412 billion and ordinary shareholder’s equity of £23.5 billion at 31 December 2002. RBS is strongly capitalised with a total capital ratio of 11.7% and tier 1 capital ratio of 7.3% as at 31 December 2002. |
| Organisational
structure and business overview The Group’s activities are organised in the following business divisions: Corporate Banking and Financial Markets, Retail Banking, Retail Direct, Manufacturing, Wealth Management, Direct Line Group, Ulster Bank, Citizens and the Centre. A description of each of the businesses is given below. |
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets (“CBFM”) is the largest provider of banking services to medium and large businesses in the UK and the leader in the UK in asset finance. It provides an integrated range of products and services to mid-sized and large corporate and institutional customers in the UK and overseas, including corporate and commercial banking, treasury and capital markets products, structured and leveraged finance, trade finance, leasing and factoring. |
| Financial Markets provides corporate and institutional customers with treasury services, including global interest rate derivatives trading, bond origination and trading, sovereign debt trading, futures brokerage, foreign exchange, money market, currency derivative and rate risk management services. It also engages in similar activities for its own account, and provides treasury services support to the Group. RBS Greenwich Capital, with headquarters in Connecticut, US, delivers debt market solutions tailored to meet the needs of companies and institutions around the world. |
| On 1 January 2002, Ulster Bank’s leasing business was transferred to CBFM and in May 2002, Lombard, the leasing arm of CBFM, completed the acquisition of Dixon Motors PLC, one of the UK’s largest car dealerships. |
| Retail Banking provides a wide range of banking, insurance and related financial services to individuals and small businesses. These services are delivered from a network of Royal Bank and NatWest branches throughout Great Britain and through the telephone, ATMs and the internet. It also has complementary subsidiary businesses covering life assurance and pensions. |
| In the personal banking market, Retail Banking offers money transmission, savings and loan facilities. In the small business banking market, Retail Banking provides a range of services which includes money transmission and cash management, short, medium and long-term finance and retail and wholesale deposit-taking products. |
| In December 2002, the Royal Bank acquired Royal Bank of Scotland Unit Trust Management Limited and Royal Bank of Scotland Portfolio Management Limited. |
| Retail Direct issues a comprehensive range of credit, charge and debit cards to personal and corporate customers and engages in merchant acquisition and processing facilities for retail businesses. It also includes Tesco Personal Finance (“TPF”), The One account (formerly Virgin One), Direct Line Financial Services (“DLFS”), Lombard Direct, the Group’s internet banking platform, the Primeline brand and in Europe, the Comfort Card businesses, all of them offering products to customers through direct channels. In June 2002, Retail Direct completed the acquisition of the remaining interest that it did not previously own in WorldPay Limited, a well established provider of payment services to businesses trading through the internet. |
| Manufacturing supports the customer facing businesses, mainly CBFM, Retail Banking and Retail Direct, and provides operational technology, customer support in telephony, account management and money transmission, global purchasing, property and other services. |
| Manufacturing drives optimum efficiencies in high volume processing activities, leverages the Group’s purchasing power and has become the centre of excellence for managing large scale and complex change such as integration. |
| Wealth Management comprises Coutts Group, Adam & Company and the offshore banking businesses, The Royal Bank of Scotland International and NatWest Offshore. The Coutts Group focuses on private banking. The offshore businesses deliver retail banking services to local and expatriate customers, and corporate banking and treasury services to corporate, intermediary and institutional clients. Adam & Company is a private bank operating primarily in Scotland. |
| In September 2002, Wealth Management sold 50% of its interest in NatWest Stockbrokers Limited to TD Waterhouse, part of Toronto Dominion Bank of Canada. |
page 7
| Direct Line Group sells and underwrites retail and wholesale insurance on the telephone and the internet. The Retail Division sells general insurance and motor breakdown services direct to the customer and UKI Partnerships (formerly Green Flag) is a leading wholesale provider of insurance and motoring related services. Through its International Division, Direct Line sells insurance in Spain, Germany, Italy and Japan. The acquisition of Royal & Sun Alliance’s direct motor insurance operation in Italy was completed in September 2002, making Direct Line the leading direct motor insurer in Italy. |
| Ulster Bank provides a comprehensive range of retail and wholesale financial services in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Retail Banking has a network of branches throughout Ireland and operates in the personal, commercial and wealth management sectors. Corporate Banking and Financial Markets provides a wide range of services in the corporate and institutional markets. On 1 January 2002, Ulster Bank’s leasing business was transferred to CBFM. |
| Citizens is engaged in retail and corporate banking activities through its branch network in the states of Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey. Citizens is the second largest bank in New England and the 17th largest commercial bank in the US measured by deposits. Citizens provides a full range of retail and corporate banking services, including personal banking, residential mortgages and home equity loans. In addition, Citizens engages in a wide variety of commercial loans (including real estate), consumer lending, credit card services, trust services and retail investment services. Citizens also operates subsidiaries primarily engaged in equipment lease financing. |
| In October 2002, Citizens completed the acquisition of Medford Bancorp Inc, a Massachusetts savings bank, and in January 2003, completed the acquisition of Pennsylvania based commercial bank, Commonwealth Bancorp Inc. |
| The Centre comprises group and corporate functions which provide services to the operating divisions. |
| Competition The company and its subsidiaries are subject to intense competition in all aspects of their business. In the UK, the Royal Bank and NatWest’s principal competitors are other clearing banks, building societies (which are similar to savings and loans associations in the US) and the other major international banks. |
| Competition to serve corporate and institutional customers in the UK remains strong. In addition to the UK clearing bank groups, large US and European financial institutions are also active and offer combined investment and commercial banking capabilities. The capital markets continue to innovate and provide a broad range of financing and risk management solutions for corporate customers. In asset finance, Lombard competes with both banks and specialised asset finance providers. |
| In the small business banking market, the Group competes with other UK clearing bank groups, with specialised finance providers and building societies. During 2002, competition within small business banking remained strong as former building societies continued to develop their offerings. |
| In the personal banking market, competition remains intense. In addition to UK banks and building societies, major retailers, life assurance companies and internet-only players are active in the market. NatWest Life and Royal Scottish Assurance compete with Independent Financial Advisors and life assurance companies. The competitive situation in the long term savings market is dynamic due to regulatory changes and the impact of highly volatile securities markets on both customer confidence and traditional with-profits life assurance companies’solvency. |
| The UK credit card market is highly competitive. Major retailers, utilities and specialist card issuers, including the major US operators, are active in the market in addition to UK banks and building societies. Competition is across a range of dimensions, including aggressive pricing, loyalty and reward schemes and packaged benefits. In addition to physical distribution channels, providers compete through direct marketing activity and increasingly, the internet. |
| In Wealth Management, The Royal Bank of Scotland International and NatWest Offshore compete with other UK and international banks to offer offshore banking services. Coutts Group and Adam & Company compete as private banks with UK clearing and private banks and with international private bankers. Difficult market conditions have seen some retrenchment of competitive activity, particularly in the ‘mass-affluent’ segment. |
| Direct Line competes in personal insurance. The market is highly competitive, particularly the motor segment. Direct Line faces competition from a range of insurance companies who now operate telephone and internet direct sales business. Direct Line also competes in the direct motor insurance markets in Spain, Italy, Germany and Japan. |
| In Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, Ulster Bank competes in retail and commercial banking with the major Irish banks and building societies, and with other UK and international banks and building societies active in the market. Competition is intensifying as both UK and Irish institutions seek to expand their businesses. |
| page 8 | Description of business continued |
| In the United States, Citizens, through its banking subsidiaries, competes primarily in New England, and from December 2001, in Pennsylvania, in retail and mid-corporate banking markets with local and regional banks and other financial institutions. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group also competes in the US through RBS Greenwich Capital and branches of RBS and NatWest, in large corporate lending and specialised finance markets, and in fixed-income trading and sales. Competition is principally with the large US commercial and investment banks and international banks active in the US. |
| In other international markets, principally in continental Europe, the Group faces competition from the leading domestic and international institutions active in the relevant national markets. |
page 9
| Risk
factors Set out below are certain risk factors which could affect the Group’s future results and cause them to be materially different from expected results. The Group’s results could also be affected by competition and other factors. The factors discussed in this report should not be regarded as a complete and comprehensive statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. |
| The financial performance of the Group is affected by borrower credit quality and general economic conditions, in particular in the UK Risks arising from changes in credit quality and the recoverability of loans and amounts due from counterparties are inherent in a wide range of the Group’s businesses. Adverse changes in the credit quality of the Group’s borrowers and counterparties or a general deterioration in UK or global economic conditions, or arising from systemic risks in the financial systems, could affect the recoverability and value of the Group’s assets and require an increase in the provision for bad and doubtful debts and other provisions. |
| Changes in interest rates,foreign exchange rates,equity prices and other market factors affect the Group’s business The most significant market risks the Group faces are interest rate, foreign exchange and bond and equity price risks. Changes in interest rate levels, yield curves and spreads may affect the interest rate margin realised between lending and borrowing costs. Changes in currency rates, particularly in the sterling-dollar and sterling-euro exchange rates, affect the value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and affect earnings reported by the Group’s non-UK subsidiaries, mainly Citizens, RBS Greenwich Capital and Ulster Bank, and may affect income from foreign exchange dealing. The performance of financial markets may cause changes in the value of the Group’s investment and trading portfolios. The Group has implemented risk management methods to mitigate and control these and other market risks to which the Group is exposed. However, it is difficult to predict with accuracy changes in economic or market conditions and to anticipate the effects that such changes could have on the Group’s financial performance and business operations. |
| The Group’s insurance businesses are subject to inherent risks involving claims provisions Future claims in the Group’s general and life assurance business may be higher than expected as a result of changing trends in claims experience resulting from catastrophic weather conditions, demographic developments, changes in mortality and other causes outside the Group’s control. Such changes would affect the profitability of current and future insurance products and services. The Group re-insures some of the risks it has assumed. |
| Operational risks are inherent in the Group’s business The Group’s businesses are dependent on the ability to process a very large number of transactions efficiently and accurately. Operational risk and losses can result from fraud, errors by employees, failure to document transactions properly or to obtain proper internal authorisation, failure to comply with regulatory requirements and Conduct of Business rules, equipment failures, natural disasters or the failure of external systems, for example, the Group’s suppliers or counterparties. Although the Group has implemented risk controls and loss mitigation actions, and substantial resources are devoted to developing efficient procedures and to staff training, it is only possible to be reasonably, but not absolutely, certain that such procedures will be effective in controlling each of the operational risks faced by the Group. |
| Each of the Group’s businesses is subject to substantial regulation and regulatory oversight.Any significant regulatory developments could have an effect on how the Group conducts its business and on the Group’s results of operations The Group is subject to financial services laws, regulations, administrative actions and policies in each location in which the Group operates. This supervision and regulation, in particular in the UK, if changed could materially affect the Group’s business, the products and services offered or the value of assets. |
| The Group’s future growth in earnings and shareholder value depends on strategic decisions regarding organic growth and potential acquisitions The Group devotes substantial management and planning resources to the development of strategic plans for organic growth and identification of possible acquisitions, supported by substantial expenditure to generate growth in customer business. If these strategic plans do not meet with success, the Group’s earnings could grow more slowly or decline. |
| page 10 | Operating and financial review |
| Critical
accounting policies The reported results of the Group are sensitive to the accounting policies, assumptions and estimates that underlie the preparation of its financial statements. The Group’s principal accounting policies are set out on pages 93 to 95. UK company law and accounting standards require the directors, in preparing the Group’s financial statements, to select suitable accounting policies, apply them consistently and make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent. Where UK GAAP allows a choice of policy, Financial Reporting Standard (“FRS”) 18 ‘Accounting Policies’ requires an entity to adopt those policies judged to be most appropriate to its particular circumstances for the purpose of giving a true and fair view. |
| The judgements and assumptions involved in the Group’s accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of its financial condition are discussed below. The use of estimates, assumptions or models that differ from those adopted by the Group would affect its reported results. |
| Loans and advances – provisions for bad and doubtful debts The Group provides for losses existing in its lending book so as to state its loan portfolio at its expected ultimate net realisable value. Specific provisions are established against individual exposures and the general provision covers advances impaired at the balance sheet date but which have not been identified as such. For exposures that are individually assessed, the specific provision is determined from a review of the financial condition of the counterparty and any guarantor and takes into account the value of any security. For certain portfolios of homogeneous loans, specific provisions are established on a portfolio basis, based on historical loss experience and the level of arrears. The general provision is assessed in the light of general economic conditions, the size and diversity of the Group’s portfolio, a review of internal credit risk classifications and the scope of specific provisioning procedures. |
| The determination of the Group’s specific and general bad debt provisions involves numerous estimates and judgements. These include the identification of deteriorating loans, the amounts and timing of loan cash flows and the realisable value of collateral. |
| Loans and advances – recognition of interest income Interest is accrued on loans and advances unless its receipt is in significant doubt. Doubtful interest is not credited to the profit and loss account but to an interest in suspense account. Interest is not accrued on loans that have been written off. |
| Fair value Securities and derivatives held for trading purposes are carried at fair value with changes in this value reflected in the profit and loss account. Fair values are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted prices are not available for an instrument, fair value is determined from market prices for its components using appropriate pricing models. Where the Group’s position is of such a size that the price obtainable would be materially different from the quoted price, the quoted price is adjusted based on management’s estimate of the price that the Group would realise from the holding in current market conditions. Where instruments such as over-the-counter derivatives are valued using pricing models, the value of the instrument and changes in that value are affected by the model and its underlying assumptions. |
| General insurance claims The Group makes provision for the full cost of settling outstanding claims at the balance sheet date, including claims estimated to have been incurred but not yet reported at that date and claims handling expenses. Provisions are determined by management based on experience of claims settled and on statistical models which require certain assumptions to be made regarding the incidence, timing and amount of claims and any specific factors such as adverse weather conditions. |
| Goodwill The Group capitalises acquired goodwill and amortises it over its useful economic life. Under UK GAAP, there is a rebuttable presumption that the useful economic life of purchased goodwill is limited and does not exceed 20 years from the date of acquisition. |
| Accounting
developments UK GAAP The Group has implemented FRS 19 ‘Deferred Tax’ which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities on all timing differences, with specified exceptions. Previously, provision was made for deferred tax only to the extent that timing differences were expected to reverse and the deferred tax liability crystallise in the foreseeable future. The effect of adopting the new policy is to increase the tax charge for 2002 by £45 million and to reduce profit and loss account reserves at 31 December 2002 by £162 million. Prior periods have been restated as follows: |
| Pro forma | |||||||
| 2001 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
| £m | £m | £m | |||||
| Decrease in profit and loss account reserves at 31 December | (117 | ) | (117 | ) | (117 | ) | |
| Increase in deferred tax asset at 31 December | 77 | 65 | 65 | ||||
| Increase in deferred tax liability at 31 December | 194 | 182 | 182 | ||||
| Increase in tax charge for the year | - | 21 | 6 | ||||
page 11
| Following the issuance of Urgent Issues Task Force Abstract 33 ‘Obligations in capital instruments’ (“UITF 33”) in February 2002, the Group has reclassified its perpetual regulatory tier one securities, issued in August 2001, from non-equity shareholders’ funds to subordinated liabilities and the interest on these securities (£60 million in 2002) is now included in interest payable rather than non-equity dividends. Comparative figures have been restated resulting in an increase in interest payable of £23 million in 2001, a reduction in non-equity shareholders’ funds of £835 million, an increase in undated loan capital of £820 million and an increase in accruals and deferred income of £15 million as at 31 December 2001. |
| International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) In June 2002, the European Parliament and Council of the European Union issued a Regulation that will require all EU listed companies to prepare their consolidated accounts in accordance with IFRS rather than existing national GAAP. The Regulation takes effect from 2005, consequently the accounting framework under which the Group reports will change. The Group will produce its consolidated accounts in accordance with IFRS for the year ended 31 December 2005. |
| US GAAP The following USGAAP developments have no material affect on the Group’s USGAAP reporting. |
| In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 145 ‘Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections’. SFAS 145 rescinds existing requirements for accounting for extinguishments of debt, removes an inconsistency in the existing requirements for accounting by lessees for certain lease amendments, and makes other technical corrections to existing statements. |
| In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 147 ‘Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions’. SFAS 147 requires certain acquisitions that fell within the scope of SFAS 72 ‘Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions’ to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141 ‘Business Combinations’, and includes transitional provisions to deal with unidentified intangible assets recognised under SFAS 72. SFAS 147 is effective from 1 October 2002. |
| The Group is currently considering the effect, if any, of the following US GAAP developments on its USGAAP reporting. |
| In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146 ‘Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities’. SFAS 146 addresses the recognition and measurement of employee termination costs, contract termination costs and other costs associated with exit or disposal activities, and related disclosures. SFAS 146 is applicable to exit and disposal activities initiated after 31 December 2002. |
| In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45 ‘Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34’. FIN 45 requires guarantees entered into or modified after 31 December 2002 to be recognised and measured initially at their fair value. The Group is reviewing the initial recognition and measurement requirements of this Statement to assess their effect on its US GAAP reporting. |
| In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148 ‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123’. SFAS 148 addresses the treatment of a voluntary change in accounting for stock-based employee compensation from the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25, ‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’, to the fair value based method under SFAS 123. The Group is currently not contemplating moving to accounting for stock-based compensation using the fair value based method of SFAS. |
| In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ‘Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51’. FIN 46 addresses accounting for variable interest entities, which are entities where the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without subordinated support from other parties to absorb losses, or where the equity investors lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity. An enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity if it holds an interest that will absorb the majority of its expected losses or receive a majority of its expected residual returns. FIN 46 requires the holder of a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity to make certain disclosures. The requirements of FIN 46 apply to new variable interest entities created after 31 January 2003, or where the reporting entity acquires an interest after that date, and to other variable interest entities in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after 15 June 2003. |
| However, FIN 46 requires disclosures in financial statements issued after 31 January 2003 about variable interest entities that, when FIN 46 becomes effective, it is reasonably possible that the reporting enterprise will consolidate or about which the enterprise will disclose information in accordance with FIN 46. The Group has undertaken a review to identify variable interest entities in which it is the primary beneficiary or in which it has a significant variable interest. The Group has concluded that it is reasonably possible that it is the primary beneficiary of, or has a significant interest in a number of commercial paper conduits and other asset securitisation vehicles that meet FIN 46’s definition of a variable interest entity. These entities acquire financial assets from third parties or from the Group funded by the issue of commercial paper or other debt instruments. The Group |
| page 12 | Operating and financial review continued |
| supplies certain administrative services and provides credit enhancement, liquidity facilities and derivative transactions to some or all of the entities on an arm’s length basis. In the case of the commercial paper conduits, the Group provides programme wide credit enhancement by letters of credit or loan facilities across all tranches of assets funded by conduits. The Group provides funding in the form of reverse repurchase agreements on bonds owned by one variable interest entity. At 31 December 2002, the Group held loan notes issued by these entities with a principal amount of £19 million, had outstanding undrawn liquidity lines amounting to £3.6 billion, and total rate of return swaps with a notional amount of £0.7 billion. The Group’s maximum exposure to loss, in the event of non-performance of the entire portfolio of assets in these entities and if all counterclaims proved valueless, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. |
| As experience with FIN 46 develops, the Group is continuing to review its existing interests to identify other variable interest entities in which the Group may have a significant variable interest or of which the Group may be the primary beneficiary. |
page 13
| Overview
of results In the review and analysis of results on pages 14 to 26, the Group’s 2002 results are compared with 2001. In addition, the 2001 results are compared with 2000 on both a pro forma and a statutory basis. The acquisition of NatWest had a significant effect on the Group’s financial position in 2000. Pro forma results for the year ended 31 December 2000 were prepared on the assumption that NatWest was acquired on 1 January 2000, and a number of other assumptions detailed below. Management believes that this approach facilitates relevant and meaningful comparisons and provides a benchmark against which the Group’s current and future performance can be judged. |
| Basis of presentation and preparation of results |
| (1) | Basis
of presentation The results for the three years ended 31 December 2002 have been presented on the following basis: |
| • | Operating profit is stated before goodwill amortisation and integration costs which are shown separately on the face of the profit and loss account. |
| • | Integration costs comprise expenditure incurred in respect of cost reduction and revenue enhancement targets set in connection with the acquisition of NatWest, costs of integrating the regional retail and commercial banking operations acquired from Mellon Financial Corporation in December 2001 (“the Mellon Regional Franchise”), together with expenditure incurred on the related cost reduction and revenue enhancement targets, and the costs of integrating Medford Bancorp Inc. acquired in October 2002. |
| (2) | Basis
of preparation of 2000 pro forma results The pro forma results for 2000 have been prepared on the basis set out below: |
| • | They incorporate the full year results of NatWest for 2000 and assume that the fair value adjustments were made on 31 December 1999. |
| • | Goodwill arising on the acquisition of NatWest of £11,483 million has been amortised over its estimated economic life of 20 years. |
| Goodwill arising on other acquisitions made by the Group after 1 January 2000 has been amortised from the effective dates of acquisition, generally also over 20 years. Goodwill arising on acquisitions prior to 1 January 2000 was written off directly to reserves and has not been reinstated, as permitted by FRS 10. |
| • | A surplus of £1,070 million in NatWest Pension Funds has been amortised, from 1 January 2000, over the estimated average remaining service life of members of the schemes. |
| • | An adjustment has been made to reflect the net funding of the acquisition of NatWest as if acquired on 1 January 2000. The net funding comprises cash paid and loan notes issued to NatWest shareholders of £7,349 million and fees and expenses relating to the acquisition of £176 million less net proceeds of £3,910 million from the issue of new ordinary and preference shares and £20 million of proceeds from the exercise of options over NatWest ordinary shares. |
| • | The results of NatWest businesses disposed of since 1 January 2000 and the profit arising on their sale have been excluded from the pro forma results. The principal disposals were Gartmore and the venture capital investments of NatWest. A funding adjustment has been made to recognise the benefit of estimated net proceeds of £1,500 million assuming that these funds were received on 1 January 2000. |
| The derivation of the pro forma results for 2000 is set out on page 160. |
| page 14 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Summary
consolidated profit and loss account for the year ended 31 December 2002 The profit and loss account set out below shows goodwill amortisation and integration costs separately. In the statutory profit and loss account on pages 96 and 97, these items are included in the captions prescribed by the Companies Act. |
| Pro forma | |||||||||
| 2002 | 2001* | 2000* | 2000* | ||||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | ||||||
| Net interest income | 7,849 | 6,846 | 5,286 | 5,929 | |||||
| Dividend income | 58 | 54 | 44 | 46 | |||||
| Fees and commissions receivable | 5,308 | 4,735 | 3,614 | 4,079 | |||||
| Fees and commissions payable | (965 | ) | (930 | ) | (706 | ) | (804 | ) | |
| Dealing profits | 1,462 | 1,426 | 933 | 1,131 | |||||
| Other operating income | 1,209 | 1,052 | 874 | 998 | |||||
| 7,072 | 6,337 | 4,759 | 5,450 | ||||||
| General insurance premium income - net | 1,894 | 1,375 | 950 | 979 | |||||
| Non-interest income | 8,966 | 7,712 | 5,709 | 6,429 | |||||
| Total income | 16,815 | 14,558 | 10,995 | 12,358 | |||||
| Staff costs | 3,942 | 3,461 | 3,019 | 3,440 | |||||
| Other operating expenses | 3,727 | 3,380 | 2,815 | 3,174 | |||||
| Operating expenses | 7,669 | 6,841 | 5,834 | 6,614 | |||||
| Profit before other operating charges | 9,146 | 7,717 | 5,161 | 5,744 | |||||
| General insurance claims – net | 1,350 | 948 | 673 | 698 | |||||
| Operating profit before provisions | 7,796 | 6,769 | 4,488 | 5,046 | |||||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 1,286 | 984 | 550 | 602 | |||||
| Amounts written off fixed asset investments | 59 | 7 | 42 | 43 | |||||
| Profit before goodwill amortisation and integration costs | 6,451 | 5,778 | 3,896 | 4,401 | |||||
| Goodwill amortisation | 731 | 651 | 537 | 640 | |||||
| Integration costs | 957 | 875 | 389 | 434 | |||||
| Profit before tax | 4,763 | 4,252 | 2,970 | 3,327 | |||||
| Tax | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | 1,177 | |||||
| Profit after tax | 3,207 | 2,715 | 1,916 | 2,150 | |||||
| Minority interests (including non-equity) | 133 | 90 | 50 | 54 | |||||
| Preference dividends - non-equity | 305 | 358 | 294 | 328 | |||||
| 2,769 | 2,267 | 1,572 | 1,768 | ||||||
| Additional Value Shares dividend - non-equity | 798 | 399 | - | - | |||||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | 1,768 | |||||
| Earnings per ordinary share | 68.4 | p | 67.6 | p | 66.9 | p | 66.5 | p | |
| Additional Value Shares dividend | 27.7 | p | 14.5 | p | - | - | |||
| 96.1 | p | 82.1 | p | 66.9 | p | 66.5 | p | ||
| Goodwill amortisation | 24.2 | p | 23.2 | p | 22.4 | p | 23.6 | p | |
| Integration costs | 23.8 | p | 22.6 | p | 11.9 | p | 11.7 | p | |
| Adjusted earnings per ordinary share | 144.1 | p | 127.9 | p | 101.2 | p | 101.8 | p | |
| * | restated (see page 10) |
page 15
| Profit RBS increased its profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs by 12%, or £673 million, from £5,778 million to £6,451 million. |
| After goodwill amortisation and integration costs, profit before tax was up 12%, from £4,252 million to £4,763 million. Integration costs relating to NatWest, the Mellon Regional Franchise and Medford Bancorp Inc. (“Medford”) were £957 million against £875 million in 2001. |
| Total income RBS continued to achieve strong growth in income. Total income at £16,815 million was up by 16%, or £2,257 million. Excluding acquisitions, total income rose by 12%. |
| Citizens increased its income by 53% (15% underlying growth, excluding the effect of acquisitions and exchange rate fluctuations), Direct Line Group by 39% (34% excluding acquisitions) and Retail Direct by 16%. |
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets income was up by 11%, notwithstanding Financial Markets’ strong performance in 2001 when it benefited from market volatility and falling interest rates. |
| Retail Banking grew its income by 8% and Ulster Bank by 8%. Income in Wealth Management declined 3% as the effect of lower stock market values on activity levels and fees more than offset the benefit from increased customer numbers and volumes. |
| Net interest income Net interest income increased by 15%, or £1,003 million, to £7,849 million. Net interest income accounted for 47% of total income. Average interest-earning assets of the banking business increased by 14%. |
| Net interest margin The Group’s net interest margin remained stable at 3.1%. Improved lending margins offset the downward pressure on deposit margins arising from lower interest rates. |
| Non-interest income Non-interest income increased by 16%, or £1,254 million, to £8,966 million. Non-interest income accounted for 53% of total income. |
| Fees and commissions receivable were up 12%, or £573 million. Volume driven increases in lending fees and continued strong growth in fee paying current accounts contributed to the increase. Dealing profits at £1,462 million were up £36 million, 3%, on the strong performance in 2001. The increase in dealing profits resulted from customer led business growth and higher revenues from trading in interest rate instruments. Other operating income was £157 million, 15% higher mainly due to the expansion of CBFM’s operating lease business. General insurance premium income, after reinsurance, rose by 38%, or £519 million reflecting Direct Line Group’s organic growth and acquisitions in Continental Europe. |
| Operating expenses Operating expenses, excluding goodwill amortisation and integration costs, rose by 12%, or £828 million, to £7,669 million. Excluding acquisitions, operating expenses were up 7%, £469 million in support of strong growth in business volumes. |
| Cost:income ratio Strong income growth coupled with tight cost management resulted in a further improvement in the Group’s cost:income ratio, to 45.6% from 47.0%. Excluding the effect of acquisitions, the cost:income ratio improved to 45.0%. |
| Net insurance claims General insurance claims, after reinsurance, increased by 42%, or £402 million, to £1,350 million reflecting significant volume growth and acquisitions at Direct Line. |
| Provisions The profit and loss charge for provisions was £1,345 million compared with £991 million in 2001. The charge for the two halves of the year was consistent with the second half of 2001. |
| Bad debt provisions amounted to £1,286 million compared with £984 million in 2001. The charge reflects overall growth in lending and, as in the second half of 2001, is particularly influenced by provisions required against a number of specific corporate situations. Amounts written off fixed asset investments, largely in the first half of the year, were £59 million against £7 million in 2001. |
| Total balance sheet provisions for bad debts amounted to £3,927 million at 31 December 2002, up 8% from £3,653 million at 31 December 2001. |
| page 16 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Credit quality Overall credit quality remains strong with no material change in the distribution by grade of the Group’s total risk assets compared with the position at the previous year end. |
| Risk elements in lending amounted to £4,871 million at 31 December 2002, up 8% from £4,493 million at 31 December 2001, and up 2% from £4,791 million at 30 June 2002. |
| Total provision coverage (the ratio of total balance sheet provisions to risk elements in lending) at 31 December 2002 was maintained at 81%. |
| Risk elements in lending and potential problem loans in aggregate amounted to £6,054 million, an increase of 9% over 31 December 2001 and 1% over 30 June 2002. |
| Integration The Group successfully completed the conversion of NatWest IT systems on to the RBS technology platform in October 2002. This programme ran for 30 months and involved more than 4,000 staff, culminating in the migration of a customer base three times the size of the Royal Bank of Scotland on to a single technology platform. The scale and complexity of this project are without precedent. |
| Annualised revenue benefits of £805 million and annualised cost savings of £1,350 million were delivered by December 2002. In addition, by February 2003 all integration initiatives had been completed. As a result the full programme annualised benefits, comprising £890 million revenue benefits and £1,440 million cost savings, have been achieved less than three years after the acquisition of NatWest. |
| Cumulative combined revenue and cost benefits to the profits for the period 2000 to 2002 amounted to £3.6 billion, which is £1.1 billion ahead of the original plan. |
| In the US, Citizens completed the IT integration of the Mellon Regional Franchise in August 2002, earlier than planned. Benefits from this transaction have been delivered more quickly than was envisaged, and are on track to be delivered in full. |
| Earnings and dividends Earnings per ordinary share, adjusted for goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the dividend on Additional Value Shares (“AVS”), increased by 13% from 127.9p to 144.1p. Basic earnings per ordinary share increased by 1% from 67.6p to 68.4p, reflecting the increase in the AVS dividend paid during the year. |
| A second dividend of 30.0p per share was paid on 2 December 2002 to the holders of AVS issued in connection with the acquisition of NatWest. By the end of 2002, a total of 45.0p per AVS had been paid, in accordance with the original payment schedule. The third and final AVS dividend, if declared by the directors, of 55.0p per AVS will be paid on 1 December 2003. |
| A final dividend of 31.0p per ordinary share is recommended, resulting in a total ordinary dividend for the year of 43.7p per ordinary share, an increase of 15%. The total dividend is covered 3.3 times by earnings before goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the AVS dividend. |
| Balance sheet Total assets were £412 billion at 31 December 2002, 12% higher than total assets of £369 billion at 31 December 2001. Of the total assets, £311 billion (76%) related to banking business and £101 billion (24%) to trading business (31 December 2001: £285 billion (77%) banking business and £84 billion (23%) trading business). |
| Lending to customers excluding repurchase agreements and stock borrowing (“reverse repos”) increased by 13%, £22 billion. Including reverse repos, loans and advances to customers were up 17%. Customer deposits increased by 10%, from £199 billion at 31 December 2001 to £219 billion at 31 December 2002. Excluding repurchase agreements and stock lending (“repos”), customer deposits grew by 7%, £13 billion. |
| Capital ratios at 31 December 2002 were 7.3% (tier 1) and 11.7% (total), against 7.1% (tier 1) and 11.5% (total) at 31 December 2001. |
| Profitability The adjusted after-tax return on ordinary equity was 17.6% compared with 16.8% for 2001. This is based on profit attributable to ordinary shareholders before integration costs, goodwill amortisation and the AVS dividend, and average ordinary equity. |
| Acquisitions In May 2002, Lombard, the leasing arm of CBFM, completed the acquisition of Dixon Motors PLC for a consideration of £118 million. |
| In July 2002, Citizens announced the acquisition of Medford Bancorp Inc., a Massachusetts savings bank for a cash consideration of US$273 million and in September 2002 announced the acquisition of Pennsylvania based commercial bank, Commonwealth Bancorp Inc for a cash consideration of US$450 million. These acquisitions were completed in October 2002 and January 2003 respectively. |
page 17
| 2001
compared with 2000 The year ended 31 December 2001 included a full year’s results of NatWest whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 only included the results of NatWest from the date of its acquisition, 6 March 2000. This has contributed to the year on year variances in addition to factors included in the following discussion on a statutory basis. For a comparison of the results for the year ended 31 December 2001 with the pro forma results for the year ended 31 December 2000, see page 18. |
| Profit before tax for the year ended 31 December 2001 at £4,252 million was up 43%, £1,282 million, from £2,970 million for the year ended 31 December 2000. All businesses contributed to this improvement. |
| Total income rose by 32%, £3,563 million, to £14,558 million. |
| Net interest income increased by 30%, £1,560 million, to £6,846 million due to strong growth in lending and deposits across all businesses. |
| Non-interest income, excluding net general insurance premiums, grew by 33%, £1,578 million, to £6,337 million. Fees and commissions receivable were up 31%, £1,121 million, to £4,735 million. Dealing profits increased by 53%, £493 million, to £1,426 million due to increased customer activity and favourable market conditions. This additional dealing income contributed approximately £160 million to the Group’s profits. Other operating income was 20%, £178 million higher at £1,052 million. |
| General insurance premium income, after reinsurance, increased by 45%, £425 million, to £1,375 million. |
| Operating expenses rose by 17%, £1,007 million, to £6,841 million primarily due to inflation, business development and customer service improvement initiatives. Staff expenses were up 15%, £442 million to £3,461 million. Other expenses were up 20%, £565 million, to £3,380 million. |
| The number of staff employed in the Group rose by 11,700, 12% to 105,700. The increase reflects approximately 5,000 staff in businesses acquired in the year, as well as additional staff to support the strong growth in business levels and to deliver enhanced customer service in the branch networks. The total also includes short-term appointments in connection with the integration of NatWest. |
| General insurance claims, after reinsurance, increased by 41%, £275 million, to £948 million. |
| New provisions were up 42%, £315 million, to £1,071 million. This increase reflected the growth in lending and the deterioration in the short-term economic outlook combined with the impact of a small number of specific customer situations. Recoveries of amounts previously written off were down £84 million, 51% to £80 million. Consequently, the net charge to the profit and loss account was up from £592 million to £991 million. |
| Total balance sheet provisions for bad and doubtful debts amounted to £3,653 million (31 December 2000 – £3,153 million) equivalent to 81% (31 December 2000 – 83%) of risk elements in lending. |
| Citizens completed the acquisition of the regional retail and commercial banking operations of Mellon Financial Corporation on 1 December 2001 for a cash consideration of approximately US$2.2 billion (£1,564 million). The goodwill arising on this acquisition amounted to £1,655 million. |
| Integration costs for NatWest were £847 million compared with £345 million in 2000; £28 million was incurred in the early stages of integrating the Mellon Regional Franchise with Citizens. |
| The tax charge for the year was £1,537 million, equivalent to 36% of profit before tax of £4,252 million. The rate was affected by goodwill amortisation, which is not allowable for UK tax purposes. The effective tax rate after adjusting for goodwill amortisation was 32% (2000 – 30%). |
| Earnings per share, adjusted for goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the dividend on the AVS, increased from 101.2 pence to 127.9 pence. |
| The first dividend of 15.0 pence per share was paid on 3 December 2001 on the AVS issued in connection with the acquisition of NatWest. |
| The total dividend for the year was 38.0 pence per ordinary share, up 15% on 2000. The total ordinary dividend is covered 3.3 times by earnings before goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the AVS dividend. |
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders after tax, minority interests and preference dividends at £2,267 million, increased by 44%. After deducting the dividend on the AVS, attributable profit increased by 19%, from £1,572 million to £1,868 million. |
| page 18 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Group total assets were £369 billion at 31 December 2001, of which £285 billion (77%) related to banking business and £84 billion (23%) to trading business. |
| Loans and advances to customers at 31 December 2001 were £190 billion, up 13% from £168 billion at 31 December 2000. Customer deposits increased by 12% from £177 billion to £199 billion. |
| Capital ratios at 31 December 2001 were 7.1% (tier 1) and 11.5% (total) compared with 6.9% (tier 1) and 11.5% (total) at 31 December 2000. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 The Group performed strongly in 2001, driven by higher income and improvements in efficiency in each of its businesses. Good progress continued to be made on the integration of NatWest. |
| Profit before tax, goodwill amortisation and integration costs at £5,778 million was up 31%, £1,377 million, from £4,401 million. Profit before tax at £4,252 million increased by 28% from £3,327 million after charging integration costs of £875 million compared with £434 million in 2000. All businesses contributed to this improvement. |
| Total income rose by 18%, £2,200 million, to £14,558 million. Strong growth was achieved across all businesses. |
| Net interest income increased by 15%, £917 million, to £6,846 million underpinned by good growth in both corporate and personal lending and deposits. Average interest-earning assets of the Group’s banking business increased by 11%, including 14% growth in average loans and advances to customers. |
| Net interest margin of the banking business rose from 3.0% to 3.1%. Improved lending spread together with the benefit of income from the proceeds of the market placing of ordinary shares in July 2001, prior to deployment in December 2001 in the acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise, contributed to this improvement and more than offset a small decrease in deposit margins. |
| Non-interest income, which represented 53% of total income, grew by 16%, £887 million, to £6,337 million, excluding general insurance. Fees and commissions receivable were up 16%, £656 million, to £4,735 million, with strong growth in lending related fees, cards and merchant acquiring and in money transmission fees. Dealing profits were up £295 million, 26% ahead of the prior year as a result of strong growth in customer activity levels and favourable market conditions. This additional dealing income contributed approximately £160 million to the Group’s profits. |
| General insurance premium income, after reinsurance, increased by 40%, £396 million, to £1,375 million, reflecting strong volume growth in Direct Line and branch based insurance. |
| Operating expenses, excluding goodwill amortisation and integration costs, rose by 3%, £227 million, to £6,841 million, with increased integration benefits from the NatWest acquisition largely offsetting increases due to inflation, business development and customer service improvement initiatives. |
| General insurance claims, after reinsurance, increased by 36%, £250 million, to £948 million in line with volume growth. |
| The Group’s focus on income growth along with tight control of costs and the benefits of integration led to a reduction in the cost:income ratio down from 53.5% to 47.0%. |
| New provisions were up 27%, £230 million to £1,071 million. This increase reflected the growth in lending and the deterioration in the short-term economic outlook combined with the impact of a small number of specific customer situations. Recoveries of amounts previously written off were down £116 million, 59% to £80 million. Consequently the net charge to the profit and loss account was up from £645 million to £991 million. |
| Earnings per share, adjusted for goodwill amortisation, integration costs and the AVS dividend, increased by 26%, from 101.8 pence to 127.9 pence. |
page 19
| Analysis
of results Net interest income |
| Pro forma | |||||||||
| 2002 | 2001* | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | ||||||
| Interest receivable | 13,561 | 14,421 | 13,218 | 14,626 | |||||
| Interest payable | (5,712 | ) | (7,575 | ) | (7,932 | ) | (8,697 | ) | |
| Net interest income | 7,849 | 6,846 | 5,286 | 5,929 | |||||
| % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Gross yield on interest-earning assets of banking business | 5.4 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 7.4 | |||||
| Cost of interest-bearing liabilities of banking business | (2.7 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (5.1 | ) | (5.1 | ) | |
| Interest spread of banking business | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |||||
| Benefit from interest-free funds | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||
| Net interest margin of banking business | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |||||
| Yields, spreads and margins of the banking business | % | % | % | % | |||||
| Gross yield | |||||||||
| Group | 5.4 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 7.4 | |||||
| UK | 5.6 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 7.5 | |||||
| Overseas | 5.0 | 6.4 | 7.3 | 7.2 | |||||
| Interest spread | |||||||||
| Group | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |||||
| UK | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | |||||
| Overseas | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.9 | |||||
| Net interest margin | |||||||||
| Group | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |||||
| UK | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | |||||
| Overseas | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.7 | |||||
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc base rate | 4.0 | 5.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | |||||
| London inter-bank three month offered rates: | |||||||||
| Sterling | 4.1 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | |||||
| Eurodollar | 1.8 | 3.8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | |||||
| Euro | 3.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |||||
| * | restated (see page 10) |
| (1) | Gross yield is the interest rate earned on average interest-earning assets of the banking business. |
| (2) | Interest spread is the difference between the gross yield and the interest rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities of the banking business. |
| (3) | Net interest margin is net interest income of the banking business as a percentage of average interest-earning assets of the banking business. |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Net interest income increased by 15%, £1,003 million, to £7,849 million. Average interest-earning assets of the Group’s banking business increased by 14%, £30.3 billion, to £250.6 billion. Within this, average loans and advances to customers were up 14%, £23.9 billion, to £190.0 billion due to growth in both corporate and personal lending. |
| Interest spread rose 0.1% to 2.7% with growth in higher-yielding customer lending offsetting the effects of the low interest rate environment. |
| Despite the increase in net interest-free funds of the banking business, up 28%, £8.6 billion, to £38.9 billion, the decline in interest rates led to a lower benefit from interest-free funds offsetting the rise in interest spread, leaving net interest margin of the banking business unchanged at 3.1%. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 and pro forma 2000 Net interest income increased by 30% and 15%, compared with 2000 and pro forma 2000 respectively, to £6,846 million underpinned by good growth in both corporate and personal lending and deposits. Average interest-earning assets of the Group’s banking business increased by 11%, including 14% growth in average loans and advances to customers compared with pro forma 2000. |
| Net interest margin of the banking business improved from 3.0% to 3.1%. Improved lending spread together with the benefit of income from the proceeds of the market placing of ordinary shares in July 2001, prior to deployment in December 2001 in the acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise, contributed to this improvement and more than offset a small decrease in deposit margins. |
| page 20 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Average balance sheet and related interest | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 2001* | ||||||||||
| Average | Average | ||||||||||
| balance | Interest | Rate | balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||
| Year ended 31 December | £m | £m | % | £m | £m | % | |||||
| Assets | |||||||||||
| Treasury and other eligible bills | |||||||||||
| UK | 910 | 24 | 2.6 | 231 | 11 | 4.8 | |||||
| Overseas | 351 | 6 | 1.7 | 277 | 8 | 2.9 | |||||
| Loans and advances to banks | |||||||||||
| UK | 13,439 | 532 | 4.0 | 18,214 | 834 | 4.6 | |||||
| Overseas | 9,811 | 304 | 3.1 | 7,467 | 421 | 5.6 | |||||
| Loans and advances to customers | |||||||||||
| UK | 154,202 | 9,141 | 5.9 | 137,232 | 9,584 | 7.0 | |||||
| Overseas | 35,759 | 1,963 | 5.5 | 28,847 | 1,981 | 6.9 | |||||
| Debt securities | |||||||||||
| UK | 17,950 | 675 | 3.8 | 16,632 | 931 | 5.6 | |||||
| Overseas | 18,188 | 916 | 5.0 | 11,427 | 651 | 5.7 | |||||
| Total interest-earning assets | |||||||||||
| – banking business | 250,610 | 13,561 | 5.4 | 220,327 | 14,421 | 6.6 | |||||
| – trading business (3) | 78,380 | 66,545 | |||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 328,990 | 286,872 | |||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 65,898 | 63,385 | |||||||||
| Total assets | 394,888 | 350,257 | |||||||||
| Percentage
of assets applicable to overseas operations |
32.0 | % | 27.1 | % | |||||||
| Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | |||||||||||
| Deposits by banks | |||||||||||
| UK | 21,090 | 544 | 2.6 | 18,360 | 760 | 4.1 | |||||
| Overseas | 9,058 | 215 | 2.4 | 8,779 | 382 | 4.4 | |||||
| Customer accounts: demand deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 58,618 | 1,062 | 1.8 | 54,237 | 1,576 | 2.9 | |||||
| Overseas | 8,275 | 99 | 1.2 | 6,422 | 154 | 2.4 | |||||
| Customer accounts: savings deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 16,002 | 463 | 2.9 | 15,892 | 594 | 3.7 | |||||
| Overseas | 11,742 | 229 | 2.0 | 11,690 | 435 | 3.7 | |||||
| Customer accounts: other time deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 45,902 | 1,542 | 3.4 | 43,161 | 1,967 | 4.6 | |||||
| Overseas | 16,264 | 462 | 2.8 | 8,127 | 338 | 4.2 | |||||
| Debt securities in issue | |||||||||||
| UK | 24,154 | 965 | 4.0 | 20,140 | 1,031 | 5.1 | |||||
| Overseas | 8,693 | 209 | 2.4 | 8,407 | 384 | 4.6 | |||||
| Loan capital | |||||||||||
| UK | 13,154 | 640 | 4.9 | 10,779 | 657 | 6.1 | |||||
| Overseas | 166 | 17 | 10.2 | 171 | 14 | 8.2 | |||||
| Internal funding of trading business | |||||||||||
| UK | (20,129 | ) | (709 | ) | 3.5 | (14,626 | ) | (654 | ) | 4.5 | |
| Overseas | (1,301 | ) | (26 | ) | 2.0 | (1,576 | ) | (63 | ) | 4.0 | |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | |||||||||||
| – banking business | 211,688 | 5,712 | 2.7 | 189,963 | 7,575 | 4.0 | |||||
| – trading business (3) | 75,059 | 63,159 | |||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 286,747 | 253,122 | |||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | |||||||||||
| Demand deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 21,848 | 21,025 | |||||||||
| Overseas | 6,401 | 4,513 | |||||||||
| Other liabilities | 52,600 | 46,249 | |||||||||
| Shareholders’ funds | |||||||||||
| – equity | 23,553 | 21,073 | |||||||||
| – non-equity | 3,739 | 4,275 | |||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | 394,888 | 350,257 | |||||||||
| Percentage
of liabilities applicable to overseas operations |
30.4 | % | 27.5 | % | |||||||
| * | restated (see page 10) |
(1) |
Notes: The analysis into UK and Overseas has been compiled on the basis of location of office. |
| (2) | Loans and advances to customers include non-accrual loans. Interest income includes income on non-accruing loans only to the extent cash payments have been received. |
| (3) | Interest receivable and interest payable on trading assets and liabilities are included in dealing profits. |
page 21
| 2000* | Pro forma 2000* | ||||||||||
| Average | Average | ||||||||||
| balance | Interest | Rate | balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||
| Year ended 31 December | £m | £m | % | £m | £m | % | |||||
| Assets | |||||||||||
| Treasury and other eligible bills | |||||||||||
| UK | 444 | 21 | 4.7 | 463 | 21 | 4.5 | |||||
| Overseas | 78 | 4 | 5.1 | 131 | 6 | 4.6 | |||||
| Loans and advances to banks | |||||||||||
| UK | 12,880 | 759 | 5.9 | 14,965 | 862 | 5.8 | |||||
| Overseas | 7,429 | 508 | 6.8 | 8,884 | 591 | 6.7 | |||||
| Loans and advances to customers | |||||||||||
| UK | 108,242 | 8,622 | 8.0 | 120,415 | 9,550 | 7.9 | |||||
| Overseas | 23,396 | 1,844 | 7.9 | 25,067 | 1,948 | 7.8 | |||||
| Debt securities | |||||||||||
| UK | 15,855 | 896 | 5.7 | 18,004 | 1,032 | 5.7 | |||||
| Overseas | 9,014 | 564 | 6.3 | 9,812 | 616 | 6.3 | |||||
| Total interest-earning assets | |||||||||||
| – banking business | 177,338 | 13,218 | 7.4 | 197,741 | 14,626 | 7.4 | |||||
| – trading business (3) | 45,122 | 53,946 | |||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 222,460 | 251,687 | |||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 46,667 | 53,044 | |||||||||
| Total assets | 269,127 | 304,731 | |||||||||
| Percentage
of assets applicable to overseas operations |
27.7 | % | 27.5 | % | |||||||
| Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | |||||||||||
| Deposits by banks | |||||||||||
| UK | 12,325 | 686 | 5.6 | 13,851 | 751 | 5.4 | |||||
| Overseas | 6,472 | 375 | 5.8 | 7,667 | 435 | 5.7 | |||||
| Customer accounts: demand deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 43,337 | 1,593 | 3.7 | 48,533 | 1,765 | 3.6 | |||||
| Overseas | 3,677 | 145 | 3.9 | 4,132 | 163 | 3.9 | |||||
| Customer accounts: savings deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 14,820 | 681 | 4.6 | 16,781 | 768 | 4.6 | |||||
| Overseas | 9,717 | 411 | 4.2 | 9,728 | 413 | 4.2 | |||||
| Customer accounts: other time deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 36,300 | 2,163 | 6.0 | 40,698 | 2,401 | 5.9 | |||||
| Overseas | 7,524 | 426 | 5.7 | 8,437 | 470 | 5.6 | |||||
| Debt securities in issue | |||||||||||
| UK | 13,797 | 815 | 5.9 | 14,831 | 869 | 5.9 | |||||
| Overseas | 6,799 | 433 | 6.4 | 7,881 | 494 | 6.3 | |||||
| Loan capital | |||||||||||
| UK | 8,941 | 647 | 7.2 | 9,829 | 699 | 7.1 | |||||
| Overseas | 413 | 40 | 9.7 | 502 | 49 | 9.8 | |||||
| Internal funding of trading business | |||||||||||
| UK | (8,943 | ) | (440 | ) | 4.9 | (10,774 | ) | (528 | ) | 4.9 | |
| Overseas | (827 | ) | (43 | ) | 5.2 | (1,025 | ) | (52 | ) | 5.1 | |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | |||||||||||
| – banking business | 154,352 | 7,932 | 5.1 | 171,071 | 8,697 | 5.1 | |||||
| – trading business (3) | 42,046 | 50,336 | |||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 196,398 | 221,407 | |||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | |||||||||||
| Demand deposits | |||||||||||
| UK | 15,581 | 18,206 | |||||||||
| Overseas | 3,531 | 3,732 | |||||||||
| Other liabilities | 34,239 | 38,715 | |||||||||
| Shareholders’ funds | |||||||||||
| – equity | 15,933 | 18,838 | |||||||||
| – non-equity | 3,445 | 3,833 | |||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity | 269,127 | 304,731 | |||||||||
| Percentage
of liabilities applicable to overseas operations |
27.6 | % | 27.6 | % | |||||||
| * | restated (see page 10) |
(1) |
Notes: The analysis into UK and Overseas has been compiled on the basis of location of office. |
| (2) | Loans and advances to customers include non-accrual loans. Interest income includes income on non-accruing loans only to the extent cash payments have been received. |
| (3) | Interest receivable and interest payable on trading assets and liabilities are included in dealing profits. |
| page 22 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Analysis
of change in net interest income - volume and rate analysis Volume and rate variances have been calculated based on movements in average balances over the period and changes in interest rates on average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities. Changes due to a combination of volume and rate are allocated pro rata to volume and rate movements. |
| 2002
over 2001 |
2001
over 2000* |
2001
over pro forma 2000* |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase/(decrease)
due to changes in: |
Increase/(decrease)
due to changes in: |
Increase/(decrease)
due to changes in: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Average volume £m |
Average rate £m |
Net change £m |
Average volume £m |
Average rate £m |
Net change £m |
Average volume £m |
Average rate £m |
Net change £m |
||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury and other eligible bills | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | 20 | (7 | ) | 13 | (10 | ) | - | (10 | ) | (11 | ) | 1 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
| Overseas | 2 | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | 6 | (2 | ) | 4 | 5 | (3 | ) | 2 | |||||||||
| Loans and advances to banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (199 | ) | (103 | ) | (302 | ) | 268 | (193 | ) | 75 | 167 | (195 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||
| Overseas | 108 | (225 | ) | (117 | ) | 3 | (90 | ) | (87 | ) | (87 | ) | (83 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||||
| Loans and advances to customers | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | 1,105 | (1,548 | ) | (443 | ) | 2,106 | (1,144 | ) | 962 | 1,229 | (1,195 | ) | 34 | |||||||||
| Overseas | 423 | (441 | ) | (18 | ) | 395 | (258 | ) | 137 | 275 | (242 | ) | 33 | |||||||||
| Debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | 69 | (325 | ) | (256 | ) | 43 | (8 | ) | 35 | (78 | ) | (23 | ) | (101 | ) | |||||||
| Overseas | 348 | (83 | ) | 265 | 141 | (54 | ) | 87 | 95 | (60 | ) | 35 | ||||||||||
| Total interest receivable of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| banking business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | 995 | (1,983 | ) | (988 | ) | 2,407 | (1,345 | ) | 1,062 | 1,307 | (1,412 | ) | (105 | ) | ||||||||
| Overseas | 881 | (753 | ) | 128 | 545 | (404 | ) | 141 | 288 | (388 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||||
| 1,876 | (2,736 | ) | (860 | ) | 2,952 | (1,749 | ) | 1,203 | 1,595 | (1,800 | ) | (205 | ) | |||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits by banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (101 | ) | 317 | 216 | (279 | ) | 205 | (74 | ) | (211 | ) | 202 | (9 | ) | ||||||||
| Overseas | (12 | ) | 179 | 167 | (114 | ) | 107 | (7 | ) | (57 | ) | 110 | 53 | |||||||||
| Customer accounts: demand deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (119 | ) | 633 | 514 | (355 | ) | 372 | 17 | (192 | ) | 381 | 189 | ||||||||||
| Overseas | (36 | ) | 91 | 55 | (80 | ) | 71 | (9 | ) | (69 | ) | 78 | 9 | |||||||||
| Customer accounts: savings deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (4 | ) | 135 | 131 | (47 | ) | 134 | 87 | 39 | 135 | 174 | |||||||||||
| Overseas | (2 | ) | 208 | 206 | (77 | ) | 53 | (24 | ) | (77 | ) | 55 | (22 | ) | ||||||||
| Customer accounts: other time deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (119 | ) | 544 | 425 | (366 | ) | 562 | 196 | (138 | ) | 572 | 434 | ||||||||||
| Overseas | (257 | ) | 133 | (124 | ) | (32 | ) | 120 | 88 | 17 | 115 | 132 | ||||||||||
| Debt securities in issue | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (184 | ) | 250 | 66 | (336 | ) | 120 | (216 | ) | (282 | ) | 120 | (162 | ) | ||||||||
| Overseas | (13 | ) | 188 | 175 | (89 | ) | 138 | 49 | (31 | ) | 141 | 110 | ||||||||||
| Loan capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (130 | ) | 147 | 17 | (121 | ) | 111 | (10 | ) | (64 | ) | 106 | 42 | |||||||||
| Overseas | - | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 21 | 5 | 26 | 28 | 7 | 35 | |||||||||||
| Internal funding of trading business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | 213 | (158 | ) | 55 | 257 | (43 | ) | 214 | 176 | (50 | ) | 126 | ||||||||||
| Overseas | (10 | ) | (27 | ) | (37 | ) | 32 | (12 | ) | 20 | 24 | (13 | ) | 11 | ||||||||
| Total interest payable of banking business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | (444 | ) | 1,868 | 1,424 | (1,247 | ) | 1,461 | 214 | (672 | ) | 1,466 | 794 | ||||||||||
| Overseas | (330 | ) | 769 | 439 | (339 | ) | 482 | 143 | (165 | ) | 493 | 328 | ||||||||||
| (774 | ) | 2,637 | 1,863 | (1,586 | ) | 1,943 | 357 | (837 | ) | 1,959 | 1,122 | |||||||||||
| Movement in net interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UK | 551 | (115 | ) | 436 | 1,160 | 116 | 1,276 | 635 | 54 | 689 | ||||||||||||
| Overseas | 551 | 16 | 567 | 206 | 78 | 284 | 123 | 105 | 228 | |||||||||||||
| 1,102 | (99 | ) | 1,003 | 1,366 | 194 | 1,560 | 758 | 159 | 917 | |||||||||||||
| * | restated (see page 10) |
page 23
| Non-interest income |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||||
| Dividend income | 58 | 54 | 44 | 46 | |||||||
| Fees and commissions receivable | 5,308 | 4,735 | 3,614 | 4,079 | |||||||
| Fees and commissions payable | (965 | ) | (930 | ) | (706 | ) | (804 | ) | |||
| Dealing profits | 1,462 | 1,426 | 933 | 1,131 | |||||||
| Other operating income | 1,209 | 1,052 | 874 | 998 | |||||||
| 7,072 | 6,337 | 4,759 | 5,450 | ||||||||
| General insurance premium income | |||||||||||
| Earned premiums | 2,383 | 1,804 | 1,344 | 1,346 | |||||||
| Reinsurance | (489 | ) | (429 | ) | (394 | ) | (367 | ) | |||
| 1,894 | 1,375 | 950 | 979 | ||||||||
| 8,966 | 7,712 | 5,709 | 6,429 | ||||||||
| 2002
compared with 2001 Non-interest income increased by 16%, or £1,254 million, to £8,966 million. Non-interest income accounted for 53% of total income. Excluding general insurance premium income, non-interest income rose by 12% or £735 million to £7,072 million reflecting strong performances in CBFM, up 12% or £384 million, Retail Direct, up 21%, or £145 million and Citizens, up £162 million of which £121 million related to acquisitions. |
| Within non-interest income, net fees and commissions increased by £538 million, 14% to £4,343 million. This reflected higher transmission fees in Retail Banking due to the growth in packaged accounts and in Citizens which benefited from acquisitions, increase in lending fees, particularly in CBFM and higher insurance income. Strong growth in Cards business and TPF also contributed to this increase. |
| Dealing profits at £1,462 million were up £36 million, 3% on the strong performance in 2001. The increase in dealing profits resulted from customer led business growth and higher revenues from trading in interest rate instruments. |
| Other operating income increased by 15% to £1,209 million. This was due to the significant growth in CBFM’s operating lease business, where income rose by 16%, £112 million, and higher profits from sale of investment securities. |
| General insurance premium income, after reinsurance, rose by 38%, or £519 million reflecting Direct Line Group’s organic growth and acquisitions in Continental Europe. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 Non-interest income, which represented 53% of total income, grew by 33%, £1,578 million, to £6,337 million, excluding general insurance. 2001 included a full year’s results for NatWest compared with 2000, which included its results from the date of acquisition, 6 March 2000. Fees and commissions receivable were up 31%, £1,121 million, to £4,735 million, with growth in lending related fees, cards and merchant acquiring and in money transmission fees. Dealing profits were £493 million, 53% ahead of the prior year as a result of growth in customer activity levels and favourable market conditions. This additional dealing income contributed approximately £160 million to the Group’s profits. |
| General insurance premium income, after reinsurance, increased by 45%, £425 million, to £1,375 million, reflecting strong volume growth in Direct Line and branch-based insurance. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Non-interest income grew by 16%, £887 million, to £6,337 million, excluding general insurance. Fees and commissions receivable were up 16%, £656 million, to £4,735 million, with strong growth in lending related fees, cards and merchant acquiring and in money transmission fees. Dealing profits were up £295 million, 26% as a result of strong growth in customer activity levels and favourable market conditions. This additional dealing income contributed approximately £160 million to the Group’s profits. |
| General insurance premium income, after reinsurance, increased by 40%, £396 million, to £1,375 million, reflecting strong volume growth in Direct Line and branch-based insurance. |
| page 24 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Operating expenses (excluding goodwill amortisation and integration costs) |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||||
| Administrative expenses | |||||||||||
| Staff costs | 3,942 | 3,461 | 3,019 | 3,440 | |||||||
| Premises and equipment | 879 | 809 | 726 | 839 | |||||||
| Other administrative | 1,955 | 1,715 | 1,380 | 1,566 | |||||||
| Total administrative expenses | 6,776 | 5,985 | 5,125 | 5,845 | |||||||
| Depreciation of tangible fixed assets | 893 | 856 | 709 | 769 | |||||||
| Operating expenses | 7,669 | 6,841 | 5,834 | 6,614 | |||||||
| 2002
compared with 2001 Operating expenses excluding goodwill amortisation and integration costs rose by 12% or £828 million to £7,669 million. This reflected the effect of acquisitions and expenditure to support strong organic growth and customer service improvements. Excluding acquisitions, operating expenses were up 7%, £469 million in support of strong growth in business volumes. |
| Staff costs were up £481 million, 14% to £3,942 million reflecting acquisitions and business growth. The number of staff employed increased by 6,100, 6% to 111,800. Excluding acquisitions since 1 January 2001, staff numbers increased by 500. |
| Premises and equipment expenses increased by £70 million, 9% to £879 million reflecting higher operating lease rentals and higher utility costs supporting business expansion. |
| The increase in other administrative expenses reflected higher marketing expenditure, outsourcing costs and legal and professional fees. |
| Strong income growth coupled with tight cost management resulted in a further improvement in the Group’s cost income ratio, to 45.6% from 47.0%. Excluding the effect of acquisitions the cost:income ratio improved to 45.0%. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 Operating expenses rose by 17%, £1,007 million, to £6,841 million. Other than the inclusion of a full year’s costs of NatWest in 2001 compared with 2000, which included its costs from the date of acquisition, 6 March 2000, the increase was primarily due to inflation, business development and customer service improvement initiatives. |
| The number of staff employed in the Group rose by 11,700, 12% to 105,700. The increase reflected approximately 5,000 staff in businesses acquired in the year, as well as additional staff to support the strong growth in business levels and to deliver enhanced customer service in the branch networks. The total also includes short-term appointments in connection with the integration of NatWest. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Operating expenses rose by 3%, £227 million, to £6,841 million, with increased integration benefits from the NatWest acquisition largely offsetting increases due to inflation, business development and customer service improvement initiatives. |
page 25
| Integration costs |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||||
| Staff costs | 530 | 598 | 255 | 286 | |||||||
| Premises and equipment | 127 | 64 | 27 | 27 | |||||||
| Other administrative expenses | 298 | 188 | 95 | 109 | |||||||
| Depreciation of tangible fixed assets | 2 | 25 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
| Integration costs | 957 | 875 | 389 | 434 | |||||||
| The IT integrations of NatWest and the Mellon Regional Franchise were completed during the year, ahead of schedule in both cases. |
| Integration costs in relation to NatWest were £810 million compared with £847 million in 2001 and £345 million in 2000. Implementation has been faster which has resulted in revenue benefits and cost savings being achieved ahead of plan. |
| Expenditure of £134 million and £13 million was incurred in 2002 relating to the integration of Mellon Regional Franchise and Medford respectively compared with £28 million in respect of Mellon Regional Franchise in 2001. The transaction benefits are being delivered more quickly than was planned. |
| Provisions |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||||
| Gross new provisions | 1,408 | 1,071 | 756 | 841 | |||||||
| less: recoveries | (63 | ) | (80 | ) | (164 | ) | (196 | ) | |||
| Charge to profit and loss account | 1,345 | 991 | 592 | 645 | |||||||
| Comprising: | |||||||||||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 1,286 | 984 | 550 | 602 | |||||||
| Amount written off fixed asset investments | 59 | 7 | 42 | 43 | |||||||
| Charge to profit and loss account | 1,345 | 991 | 592 | 645 | |||||||
| 2002
compared with 2001 Gross new provisions were up 31%, £337 million to £1,408 million. The increase reflects growth in overall lending and as in the second half of 2001, provisions required in a number of specific corporate situations. Recoveries of amounts previously written off were down £17 million, 21%, to £63 million. Consequently the net charge to the profit and loss account was up £354 million, 36% to £1,345 million. |
| Bad debt provisions amounted to £1,286 million compared with £984 million in 2001. The charge reflects overall growth in lending and is particularly influenced by provisions required against a number of specific corporate situations. Amounts written off fixed asset investments, largely in the first half of the year, were £59 million against £7 million in 2001. |
| Total balance sheet provisions for bad and doubtful debts amounted to £3,927 million, up 8% from £3,653 million at 31 December 2001. Total provision coverage (the ratio of total balance sheet provisions to risk elements in lending) at 31 December 2002 was maintained at 81%. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 and pro forma 2000 Gross new provisions were up 42% and 27% compared with 2000 and pro forma 2000 respectively, to £1,071 million. The increase reflected the growth in lending and the deterioration in the short-term economic outlook combined with the impact of a small number of specific customer situations. Recoveries of amounts previously written off were down £84 million and £116 million, compared with 2000 and pro forma 2000 respectively, to £80 million. Consequently the net charge to the profit and loss account increased to £991 million, up £399 million, 67% and £346 million, 54% on 2000 and pro forma 2000 respectively. |
| Total balance sheet provisions for bad and doubtful debts amounted to £3,653 million (2000 – £3,153 million) equivalent to 81% (2000 – 83%) of risk elements in lending. |
| page 26 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Taxation | |||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
Pro
forma 2000* £m |
||||||
| Tax on profit on ordinary activities | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | 1,177 | |||||
| % | % | % | % | ||||||
| UK corporation tax rate | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | |||||
| Effective tax rate | 32.7 | 36.1 | 35.5 | 35.4 | |||||
| The actual tax charge differs from the expected tax charge computed by applying the standard rate of UK corporation tax as follows: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000* £m |
Pro
forma 2000* £m |
||||||
| Expected tax charge | 1,429 | 1,276 | 891 | 998 | |||||
| Goodwill amortisation | 183 | 169 | 162 | 194 | |||||
| Contributions to employee share trust | (40 | ) | (48 | ) | (47 | ) | (47 | ) | |
| Non-deductible items | 179 | 251 | 197 | 189 | |||||
| Non-taxable items | (163 | ) | (92 | ) | (217 | ) | (229 | ) | |
| Capital allowances in excess of depreciation | (340 | ) | (280 | ) | (143 | ) | (143 | ) | |
| Other | 7 | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | (10 | ) | ||
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (15 | ) | 15 | (79 | ) | (79 | ) | ||
| Current tax charge for year | 1,240 | 1,284 | 750 | 873 | |||||
| Deferred taxation: | |||||||||
| Origination and reversal of timing differences | 372 | 255 | 225 | 225 | |||||
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (56 | ) | (2 | ) | 79 | 79 | |||
| Actual tax charge | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | 1,177 | |||||
| * | restated (see page 10) |
page 27
| Divisional
performance The contribution of each division before goodwill amortisation and integration costs and, where appropriate, Manufacturing costs is detailed below. |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets* | 3,203 | 3,024 | 2,431 | 2,740 | |||||
| Retail Banking | 3,019 | 2,807 | 2,116 | 2,467 | |||||
| Retail Direct | 701 | 551 | 341 | 373 | |||||
| Manufacturing | (1,682 | ) | (1,568 | ) | (1,426 | ) | (1,660 | ) | |
| Wealth Management | 432 | 459 | 354 | 405 | |||||
| Direct Line Group | 355 | 261 | 201 | 201 | |||||
| Ulster Bank* | 244 | 229 | 155 | 190 | |||||
| Citizens | 766 | 501 | 349 | 349 | |||||
| Central items | (587 | ) | **(486 | ) | (625 | ) | (664 | ) | |
| Profit before goodwill amortisation | |||||||||
| and integration costs | 6,451 | 5,778 | 3,896 | 4,401 | |||||
| * | Restated to reflect the transfer of Ulster Bank’s leasing business to Corporate Banking and Financial Markets, with effect from 1 January 2002. |
| ** | Restated following the implementation of UITF 33 in 2002 (see page 11). |
| The performance of each of the divisions is reviewed on pages 28 to 43. These discussions include: |
| (1) | Results for the year ended 31 December 2002 compared with the results for the year ended 31 December 2001. |
| (2) | Results for the year ended 31 December 2001 compared with the results for the year ended 31 December 2000. |
| (3) | Results for the year ended 31 December 2001 compared with the pro forma results for the year ended 31 December 2000. |
| The 2001 results include a full year’s contribution from NatWest businesses whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 only includes NatWest businesses from the date of acquisition, 6 March 2000. In order to provide a more relevant basis for comparing performance, pro forma results for 2000 have been prepared assuming that NatWest was acquired on 1 January 2000. The basis of preparation of pro forma results is set out on page 13. |
| page 28 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets | |||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
Pro
forma 2000* £m |
||||||
| Net interest income | 2,349 | 2,138 | 1,612 | 1,828 | |||||
| Non-interest income | 3,703 | 3,319 | 2,510 | 2,864 | |||||
| Total income | 6,052 | 5,457 | 4,122 | 4,692 | |||||
| Direct expenses | |||||||||
| – staff costs | 1,271 | 1,131 | 931 | 1,008 | |||||
| – operating lease depreciation | 461 | 434 | 358 | 400 | |||||
| – other | 392 | 366 | 196 | 314 | |||||
| Contribution before provisions | 3,928 | 3,526 | 2,637 | 2,970 | |||||
| Provisions | 725 | 502 | 206 | 230 | |||||
| Contribution | 3,203 | 3,024 | 2,431 | 2,740 | |||||
| Direct cost:income ratio (%) | 35.1 | 35.4 | 36.0 | 36.7 | |||||
| Total assets** – Corporate Banking (£bn) | 104.7 | 96.1 | 82.1 | 82.1 | |||||
| Total assets** – Financial Markets (£bn) | 98.8 | 91.6 | 85.9 | 85.9 | |||||
| Loans and advances to customers gross (£bn)** | 95.7 | 83.7 | 74.9 | 74.9 | |||||
| Customer deposits (£bn)** | 62.2 | 56.4 | 52.8 | 52.8 | |||||
| Weighted risk assets (£bn) | 136.5 | 118.3 | 100.1 | 100.1 | |||||
| * | restated (see page 27) |
| ** | excluding repos and reverse repos |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution increased by 6% or £179 million to £3,203 million. Contribution before provisions was up by 11%, £402 million to £3,928 million. |
| Total income was up 11% or £595 million to £6,052 million. Excluding acquisitions, which added £67 million, total income increased 10%. |
| Net interest income rose by 10% or £211 million to £2,349 million, reflecting customer lending growth in Corporate Banking and continued good performance by Financial Markets from strong wholesale money market activity. Average loans and advances to customers of the banking business increased by 12%, £9.3 billion to £86.9 billion. |
| Non-interest income rose by 12% or £384 million to £3,703 million, mainly as a result of increased fees, reflecting growth in lending and in payment and electronic banking activities. Dealing profits benefited from continued customer led business growth and higher revenues from trading in interest rate instruments and matched the strong performance of 2001. Operating lease business expanded significantly during 2002 with average assets increasing by 23% from £3.5 billion to £4.3 billion resulting in higher income, up 16%, £112 million. |
| Direct expenses increased by 10% or £193 million to £2,124 million. Excluding acquisitions, expenses were up £133 million or 7%, of which £106 million was higher staff costs reflecting business growth and £27 million was higher operating lease depreciation. The direct cost:income ratio improved from 35.4% to 35.1%. |
| Provisions amounted to £725 million compared with £502 million in 2001. The increase reflected growth in lending and, as in the second half of 2001, provisions required against a number of specific corporate situations, and higher investment provisions. |
page 29
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution was up 24%, £593 million, to £3,024 million. The results for the year ended 31 December 2001 included a full year’s contribution from NatWest whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 only included NatWest from the date of its acquisition, 6 March 2000. This, together with factors discussed below, contributed to the improvement in performance. |
| Total income was up 32%, £1,335 million to £5,457 million. Net interest income was up 33%, £526 million, to £2,138 million, largely due to lending growth in Corporate Banking and also as a result of favourable market conditions in Financial Markets. |
| Non-interest income was up 32%, £809 million, to £3,319 million. The increase reflected growth in customer advances, payment and transmission related fees and higher dealing profits. |
| Direct expenses were up 30%, £446 million, to £1,931 million mainly due to performance related payments to staff reflecting higher income in Financial Markets, increased business volumes and infrastructure costs of supporting European expansion and acquisitions. |
| Provisions were up £296 million to £502 million reflecting growth in lending, the global economic slowdown, a small number of specific customer situations and lower recoveries, partially offset by a reduction in amounts written off investments. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Contribution was up 10%, £284 million, to £3,024 million. |
| Total income was up 16%, £765 million, to £5,457 million. Net interest income was up 17%, £310 million, to £2,138 million, primarily due to lending growth in Corporate Banking and also as a result of the benefits of favourable market conditions in Financial Markets. Average loans and advances to customers of the banking business increased by 14%, £9.7 billion, to £77.6 billion, predominantly in Corporate Banking, both in the UK and overseas. |
| Non-interest income was up 16%, £455 million, to £3,319 million reflecting growth in customer advances, payment and transmission related fees and dealing profits. |
| Direct expenses were up 12%, £209 million, to £1,931 million. Staff costs increased by 12%, £123 million, mainly due to performance related payments reflecting higher income in Financial Markets. Other expenses, excluding operating lease depreciation, were 17%, £52 million higher, reflecting increased business volumes and infrastructure costs of supporting European expansion and acquisitions. The direct cost:income ratio improved from 36.7% to 35.4%. |
| Provisions were up £272 million to £502 million. The increase reflected growth in lending, the global economic slowdown, a small number of specific customer situations and lower recoveries, partially offset by a reduction in amounts written off investments. |
| page 30 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Retail Banking | |||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||
| Net interest income | 2,840 | 2,622 | 2,109 | 2,418 | |||||
| Non-interest income | 1,353 | 1,277 | 961 | 1,128 | |||||
| Total income | 4,193 | 3,899 | 3,070 | 3,546 | |||||
| Direct expenses | |||||||||
| – staff costs | 707 | 702 | 636 | 736 | |||||
| – other | 254 | 226 | 192 | 210 | |||||
| Contribution before provisions | 3,232 | 2,971 | 2,242 | 2,600 | |||||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 213 | 164 | 126 | 133 | |||||
| Contribution | 3,019 | 2,807 | 2,116 | 2,467 | |||||
| Direct cost:income ratio (%) | 22.9 | 23.8 | 27.0 | 26.7 | |||||
| Total assets (£bn) | 66.1 | 61.1 | 57.9 | 57.9 | |||||
| Loans and advances to customers – gross | |||||||||
| – mortgages (£bn) | 31.7 | 28.5 | 25.8 | 25.8 | |||||
| – other (£bn) | 23.5 | 20.5 | 18.5 | 18.5 | |||||
| Customer deposits (£bn) | 61.7 | 56.8 | 53.7 | 53.7 | |||||
| Weighted risk assets (£bn) | 38.6 | 35.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | |||||
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution increased by 8% or £212 million to £3,019 million. |
| Total income was up 8% or £294 million to £4,193 million. The increase in income reflected continued growth in customer numbers. The number of personal current accounts increased by 4% to 10.63 million. Retail Banking is the leading provider of services to small businesses and has 1.10 million customers. |
| Net interest income rose by 8% or £218 million to £2,840 million, reflecting strong growth in customer loans and deposits. Average loans to customers, excluding mortgages, grew by 14% or £2.7 billion to £21.8 billion. Average mortgage lending was up 10% or £2.7 billion to £29.8 billion. Average customer deposits increased by 6% or £3.1 billion to £57.2 billion. |
| Non-interest income rose by 6% or £76 million to £1,353 million, reflecting growth in packaged current accounts, transmission income and higher volumes of general insurance products sold through the Royal Bank of Scotland and NatWest networks. Strong sales performance was seen in Bancassurance with new business up 30% although the sharp fall in equity markets depressed Bancassurance income. |
| Direct expenses increased by 4% or £33 million to £961 million. Staff costs were up £5 million, 1% to £707 million. Other costs rose £28 million, 12% to £254 million partly due to increased incidence of fraud losses. |
| The direct cost:income ratio improved from 23.8% to 22.9%. |
| Provisions increased by £49 million to £213 million, reflecting recent growth in lending. |
page 31
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution was up 33%, £691 million to £2,807 million. The results for the year ended 31 December 2001 included a full year’s contribution from NatWest whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 only included NatWest from the date of its acquisition, 6 March 2000. This, together with factors discussed below, have contributed to the improvement in performance. |
| Total income was up 27%, £829 million to £3,899 million. Net interest income was 24%, £513 million higher at £2,622 million, reflecting strong growth in advances and deposits. |
| Non-interest income increased by 33%, £316 million to £1,277 million, resulting largely from growth in fee paying packaged accounts together with benefits from integration initiatives. |
| Direct expenses at £928 million were up 12%, £100 million. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts were up 30%, £38 million to £164 million, largely due to growth in lending. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Contribution increased by 14%, £340 million to £2,807 million. |
| Total income was up 10%, £353 million to £3,899 million. Net interest income was 8%, £204 million higher at £2,622 million, reflecting strong growth in advances and deposits. Average loans to customers, excluding mortgages, were up 19% to £19.1 billion. Average mortgage lending grew by 9%, £2.3 billion, to £27.1 billion. Average customer deposits were 7%, £3.7 billion higher at £54.1 billion. The customer base continued to grow in both banks, with increased market share of current accounts. The number of personal customers increased by 5% to 12.9 million and small business customers were up 3%. NatWest maintained its market leading position for small business relationships. |
| Non-interest income increased by 13%, £149 million to £1,277 million, resulting from growth in fee paying packaged accounts, up 33%, together with significant benefits from integration initiatives. |
| Direct expenses at £928 million were down 2%, £18 million, reflecting lower average headcount. The direct cost:income ratio improved from 26.7% to 23.8%. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts were up 23%, £31 million to £164 million, primarily due to growth in lending. |
| page 32 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Retail Direct | |||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||
| Net interest income | 749 | 674 | 473 | 516 | |
| Non-interest income | 841 | 696 | 501 | 565 | |
| Total income | 1,590 | 1,370 | 974 | 1,081 | |
| Direct expenses | |||||
| – staff costs | 190 | 164 | 136 | 154 | |
| – other | 418 | 400 | 291 | 327 | |
| Contribution before provisions | 982 | 806 | 547 | 600 | |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 281 | 255 | 206 | 227 | |
| Contribution | 701 | 551 | 341 | 373 | |
| Direct cost:income ratio (%) | 38.2 | 41.2 | 43.8 | 44.5 | |
| Total assets (£bn) | 19.8 | 17.2 | 14.4 | 14.4 | |
| Loans and advances to customers – gross: mortgages (£bn) | 7.4 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
| Loans and advances to customers – gross: other (£bn) | 12.4 | 11.2 | 9.7 | 9.7 | |
| Customer accounts (£bn) | 4.4 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | |
| Weighted risk assets (£bn) | 14.6 | 12.5 | 11.5 | 11.5 | |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution increased by 27% or £150 million to £701 million. |
| Total income was up 16% or £220 million to £1,590 million, reflecting continued strong growth in the Cards business and in TPF. The number of active credit card accounts increased during the year to 9.5 million. TPF continued its strong growth, increasing customer accounts across all products to 3.4 million. |
| Net interest income was up 11% or £75 million to £749 million. Average customer lending increased by 16% to £17.9 billion. In TPF, average personal loans rose by 29% to £1.1 billion and average customer deposits rose by 26% to £1.9 billion. Average mortgage lending in The One account was 36% higher at £4.3 billion and in DLFS was up 10% to £2.3 billion. Average personal lending in DLFS and Lombard Direct increased by 20% to £2 billion. |
| Non-interest income was up 21% or £145 million to £841 million mainly as a result of higher fee income reflecting growth in volumes, especially in TPF, where the total number of general insurance policies increased during the year to 1.3 million. |
| Direct expenses increased by 8% or £44 million to £608 million reflecting increased volumes and higher marketing activity to support strong business expansion. |
| The direct cost:income ratio improved from 41.2% to 38.2%. |
| Provisions increased by £26 million to £281 million due to the growth in lending volumes. |
page 33
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution was up 62%, £210 million to £551 million. The results for the year ended 31 December 2001 included a full year’s contribution from NatWest whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 only included NatWest from the date of its acquisition, 6 March 2000. This, together with factors discussed below, have contributed to the improvement in performance. |
| Total income was up 41%, £396 million to £1,370 million driven largely by strong performances in Cards and TPF. Net interest income was up £201 million to £674 million. Average mortgage lending in DLFS was 17% higher at £2.1 billion and in The One account (formerly Virgin One) the increase was 81%, from £1.7 billion to £3.1 billion. TPF increased average customer advances and customer deposits by 15% to £1.8 billion, and 29% to £1.4 billion respectively. |
| Non-interest income rose 39%, £195 million to £696 million largely as a result of increased fees reflecting higher retailer volumes. |
| Direct expenses at £564 million were 32%, £137 million higher, largely as a result of increased business volumes and marketing activity. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts increased by 24%, £49 million to £255 million reflecting the increase in unsecured lending. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Contribution rose by 48%, £178 million to £551 million, due to expansion of the Cards businesses and strong sales growth in TPF. |
| Total income was up 27%, £289 million to £1,370 million driven by strong performances in Cards and TPF. Net interest income was up 31%, £158 million to £674 million. Average card balances were up 12% to £6.6 billion. The total number of Cards’ merchant outlets increased by 8% to 206,000. |
| Average mortgage lending in DLFS was 17% higher at £2.1 billion and in The One account the increase was 81%, from £1.7 billion to £3.1 billion. TPF increased its average customer advances and customer deposits by 15% to £1.8 billion, and 29% to £1.4 billion, respectively. |
| Non-interest income rose 23%, £131 million to £696 million, primarily as a result of increased fees reflecting higher retailer volumes. |
| Direct expenses at £564 million were 17%, £83 million higher, mainly as a result of increased business volumes and marketing activity. The direct cost:income ratio improved from 44.5% to 41.2%. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts increased by 12%, £28 million to £255 million reflecting the increase in unsecured lending. |
| page 34 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Manufacturing | |||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||
| Staff costs | 479 | 428 | 409 | 490 | |
| Other costs | 1,203 | 1,140 | 1,017 | 1,170 | |
| Total manufacturing costs | 1,682 | 1,568 | 1,426 | 1,660 | |
| Analysis: | |||||
| Group Technology | 662 | 632 | 618 | 723 | |
| Group Purchasing and Property Operations | 528 | 467 | 420 | 486 | |
| Customer Support and other operations | 492 | 469 | 388 | 451 | |
| Total manufacturing costs | 1,682 | 1,568 | 1,426 | 1,660 | |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Total manufacturing costs at £1,682 million were 7% or £114 million higher than 2001. |
| The increase in costs reflects growth in business volumes arising from customer accounts, mortgage applications, personal loans and ATM transactions, and initiatives to enhance customer service, particularly in NatWest telephony. Extending the scope of Manufacturing with transfers from other parts of the Group also contributed to this increase. |
| Manufacturing successfully completed the integration of NatWest on to the RBS technology platform in October 2002, ahead of schedule. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 Total manufacturing costs of £1,568 million were 10%, £142 million higher. The year ended 31 December 2001 included a full year’s costs in respect of NatWest whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 included NatWest from the date of its acquisition, 6 March 2000. This, together with the factors discussed below contributed to the increase in costs. |
| Expenditure in Customer Support and other operations increased due to volume growth in lending and account management and costs associated with customer service enhancement initiatives. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Total manufacturing costs of £1,568 million were 6%, £92 million lower. |
| Group Technology costs reduced by 13%, £91 million to £632 million reflecting lower staff costs and the benefits of de-duplication initiatives. Expenditure in Customer Support and other operations was up £18 million, 4% to £469 million due to volume growth in lending and account management and costs associated with customer service enhancement initiatives. |
| Average staff numbers fell by 12%. Integration savings offset a rise in work transferred into the Customer Support areas which extended the Manufacturing service provision and increased support for higher business volumes along with customer service enhancement initiatives. |
page 35
| Wealth Management | |||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||
| Net interest income | 460 | 464 | 373 | 425 | |
| Non-interest income | 447 | 469 | 395 | 463 | |
| Total income | 907 | 933 | 768 | 888 | |
| Expenses | |||||
| – staff costs | 317 | 298 | 260 | 303 | |
| – other | 169 | 181 | 159 | 185 | |
| Contribution before provisions | 421 | 454 | 349 | 400 | |
| Net release of provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Contribution | 432 | 459 | 354 | 405 | |
| Cost:income ratio (%) | 53.6 | 51.3 | 54.6 | 55.0 | |
| Total assets (£bn) | 13.4 | 12.5 | 10.4 | 10.4 | |
| Investment management assets – excluding deposits (£bn) | 20.5 | 21.4 | 21.8 | 21.8 | |
| Customer deposits (£bn) | 29.1 | 29.1 | 27.6 | 27.6 | |
| Weighted risk assets (£bn) | 8.4 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 7.1 | |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution at £432 million was £27 million, 6% lower primarily due to the effect of the fall in equity markets on the level of activity and ad valorem fee income. |
| Total income was down 3% or £26 million to £907 million. |
| Net interest income declined by 1% or £4 million to £460 million, as a result of a slight contraction in deposit margins due to lower interest rates. Average customer deposits increased from £28.5 billion to £28.7 billion. |
| Non-interest income was £22 million, 5% lower at £447 million. This reflected lower equity markets which continued adversely to affect fees and commissions. Investment management assets at £20.5 billion were £0.9 billion, 4% lower as new business inflow was more than offset by the significant decline in equity markets. |
| Expenses were up 1% or £7 million to £486 million. |
| The cost:income ratio was adversely affected by the fall in income, increasing to 53.6% from 51.3%. |
| Releases and recoveries of provisions exceeded gross new provisions required. As a result, there was a net release of provisions of £11 million, against a net release of £5 million in 2001. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution increased by 30%, £105 million to £459 million. The results for the year ended 31 December 2001 included a full year’s contribution from NatWest whereas the year ended 31 December 2000 only included NatWest from the date of its acquisition, 6 March 2000. This, together with factors discussed below, have resulted in the improvement in performance. |
| Total income was up 21%, £165 million to £933 million. Net interest income grew by 24%, £91 million to £464 million. Non-interest income increased 19%, £74 million to £469 million despite the depressed equity markets and the adverse effect on investor confidence particularly in the second half of 2001. The decline in equity market values affected fees earned on assets under management. |
| Expenses were 14%, £60 million higher at £479 million. |
| There was a net release of provisions for bad and doubtful debts of £5 million (2000: release of £5 million). |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Contribution increased by 13%, £54 million to £459 million. |
| Total income was up 5%, £45 million to £933 million. Net interest income grew by 9%, £39 million to £464 million. This was largely due to higher average customer deposits, which were up 7% from £26.6 billion to £28.5 billion as customers moved out of equity investments, and growth in average customer lending, up 16%, £0.9 billion to £6.4 billion, principally in offshore banking. |
| Non-interest income increased 1%, £6 million to £469 million despite the depressed equity markets and the adverse effect on investor confidence particularly in the second half of 2001. The decline in equity market values affected fees earned on assets under management. |
| Expenses were 2%, £9 million lower at £479 million. The cost:income ratio improved from 55.0% to 51.3%. |
| There was a net release of provisions for bad and doubtful debts of £5 million (2000: release of £5 million). |
| page 36 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Direct Line Group | |||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
Pro
forma 2000 £m |
||||||
| Earned premiums | 2,383 | 1,804 | 1,344 | 1,346 | |||||
| Reinsurers’ share | (489 | ) | (429 | ) | (394 | ) | (367 | ) | |
| Insurance premium income | 1,894 | 1,375 | 950 | 979 | |||||
| Other income | 245 | 168 | 176 | 176 | |||||
| Total income | 2,139 | 1,543 | 1,126 | 1,155 | |||||
| Expenses | |||||||||
| – staff costs | 178 | 152 | 124 | 124 | |||||
| – other | 256 | 182 | 128 | 132 | |||||
| Gross claims | 1,693 | 1,263 | 981 | 982 | |||||
| Reinsurers’ share | (343 | ) | (315 | ) | (308 | ) | (284 | ) | |
| Contribution | 355 | 261 | 201 | 201 | |||||
| In-force policies (000’s) | |||||||||
| – Motor: UK | 4,668 | 4,017 | 3,219 | 3,219 | |||||
| – Motor: International | 1,224 | 601 | 286 | 286 | |||||
| – Home: UK | 1,587 | 1,360 | 1,055 | 1,055 | |||||
| Combined operating ratio – UK (%) | 89.4 | 88.0 | 86.2 | 86.2 | |||||
| Insurance reserves – UK (£m) | 1,946 | 1,541 | 1,221 | 1,221 | |||||
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution increased by 36% or £94 million to £355 million. |
| Total income was up 39% or £596 million to £2,139 million. Excluding acquisitions, which added £73 million, total income was up 34% or £523 million. |
| After reinsurance, insurance premium income was up 38% or £519 million to £1,894 million, reflecting strong growth in customer numbers. The leading position in the UK direct motor insurance market was maintained with motor insurance policies increasing 16%, or 651,000 to 4.67 million. The number of UK in-force home insurance policies increased by 17% or 227,000 to 1.59 million. The number of international in-force motor policies more than doubled to 1.22 million, including 280,000 from acquisitions. |
| Other income increased by 46% or £77 million to £245 million. Higher investment income and profit commissions contributed to this increase. |
| Expenses increased by 30% or £100 million to £434 million. Excluding acquisitions, which added £35 million, expenses were up by 20% or £65 million reflecting business expansion. |
| Net claims, after reinsurance, increased by 42% or £402 million to £1,350 million reflecting increased volumes. |
page 37
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution increased by 30%, £60 million to £261 million. This was driven by higher volumes, particularly in motor policies, and increases in partnership businesses including the joint venture with TPF. |
| Total income was up 37%, £417 million to £1,543 million. Earned premiums grew strongly, up 34%, £460 million to £1,804 million. Net insurance premium income increased by 45%, £425 million to £1,375 million. Direct motor business, where in-force policies increased 13% to 3.3 million, contributed £137 million to this increase and Direct home business was up £19 million. Strong growth from the joint venture with TPF and other motor partnerships accounted for £126 million of the increase. The acquisitions in Italy and Germany contributed £11 million of premium income in the three months since completion. |
| Expenses were up 33%, £82 million to £334 million reflecting business expansion, including the costs of establishing overseas operations in the second half of the year. |
| Net claims rose 41%, £275 million to £948 million, reflecting increased volumes. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Contribution increased by 30%, £60 million to £261 million. This was driven by higher volumes, particularly in motor policies, and increases in partnership businesses including the joint venture with TPF. |
| Total income was up 34%, £388 million to £1,543 million. Earned premiums grew strongly, up 34%, £458 million to £1,804 million. Net insurance premium income increased by 40%, £396 million to £1,375 million. Direct motor business, where in-force policies increased 13% to 3.3 million, contributed £137 million to this increase and Direct home business was up £19 million. Strong growth from the joint venture with TPF and other motor partnerships accounted for £126 million of the increase. The acquisitions in Italy and Germany contributed £11 million of premium income in the three months since completion. |
| Expenses were up 30%, £78 million to £334 million reflecting business expansion, including the costs of establishing overseas operations in the second half. |
| Net claims rose 36%, £250 million to £948 million, reflecting increased volumes. |
| page 38 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Ulster Bank | |||||
| 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
Pro
forma 2000* £m |
||
| Net interest income | 339 | 313 | 216 | 259 | |
| Non-interest income | 181 | 170 | 132 | 164 | |
| Total income | 520 | 483 | 348 | 423 | |
| Expenses | |||||
| – staff costs | 145 | 135 | 112 | 134 | |
| – other | 109 | 104 | 72 | 87 | |
| Contribution before provisions | 266 | 244 | 164 | 202 | |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 22 | 15 | 9 | 12 | |
| Contribution | 244 | 229 | 155 | 190 | |
| Cost:income ratio (%) | 48.8 | 49.5 | 52.9 | 52.2 | |
| Total assets (£bn) | 12.7 | 10.8 | 10.1 | 10.1 | |
| Loans and advances to customers – gross (£bn) | 9.1 | 7.6 | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| Customer deposits (£bn) | 8.8 | 7.7 | 7.1 | 7.1 | |
| Weighted risk assets (£bn) | 9.0 | 7.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| Average exchange rate – €/£ | 1.591 | 1.609 | 1.642 | 1.642 | |
| Spot exchange rate – €/£ | 1.536 | 1.637 | 1.606 | 1.606 | |
| * | restated (see page 27) |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution increased by 7%, or £15 million to £244 million. |
| Total income increased by 8%, £37 million to £520 million. |
| Net interest income rose by 8% or £26 million to £339 million, reflecting good growth in loans and deposits despite a less buoyant economic environment in the Republic of Ireland. Average customer lending and deposits of the banking business increased by 10%, £0.7 billion, to £8.0 billion, and by 7%, £0.5 billion, to £7.9 billion respectively. Average mortgage lending grew by 23% to £1.5 billion and the number of current accounts increased by 5%. |
| Non-interest income rose by 6% or £11 million to £181 million. Increases of £7 million in net fees and commissions and £6 million in other operating income were partially offset by a £2 million reduction in dealing profits. |
| Expenses increased by 6% or £15 million to £254 million to support higher business volumes and pay awards. |
| The cost:income ratio improved from 49.5% to 48.8%. |
| Provisions were up by £7 million to £22 million reflecting a small number of specific situations. |
page 39
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution for the year ended 31 December 2001 of £229 million was 48%, £74 million, higher than £155 million for the period from 6 March 2000 (when Ulster Bank became part of the Group as a result of the acquisition of NatWest) to 31 December 2000. |
| Total income increased by 39%, £135 million to £483 million. Net interest income rose by 45%, £97 million to £313 million due to strong growth in customer loans and deposits. Average loans and advances to customers increased to £7.2 billion, and average customer deposits increased to £7.3 billion. |
| Non-interest income was up 29%, £38 million to £170 million. The increase was mainly due to higher card, lending and transmission fees. |
| Expenses rose by 30%, £55 million to £239 million to support business expansion and expenditure related to the preparation for the issue of euro notes and coins in the Republic of Ireland. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts were up 67%, £6 million, to £15 million. The increase was largely due to growth in lending. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Contribution of £229 million was 21%, £39 million higher. |
| Total income increased by 14%, £60 million to £483 million. Net interest income rose by 21%, £54 million to £313 million due to strong growth in customer loans and deposits. Average loans and advances to customers increased by 24%, £1.4 billion, to £7.3 billion, and average customer deposits increased by 11%, £0.7 billion to £7.4 billion. |
| Non-interest income was up 4%, £6 million to £170 million. The increase was mainly due to higher card, lending and transmission fees. |
| Expenses rose by 8%, £18 million to £239 million to support business expansion. Staff costs increased by £1 million. Other expenses increased by 20%, £17 million as a result of higher marketing costs to support business expansion and expenditure related to the preparation for the issue of euro notes and coins in the Republic of Ireland. The cost:income ratio improved from 52.2% to 49.5%. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts were up 25%, £3 million to £15 million. The increase was largely due to growth in lending. |
| page 40 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Citizens | ||||
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Net interest income | 1,248 |
814 |
667 |
|
| Non-interest income | 468 |
306 |
247 |
|
| Total income | 1,716 |
1,120 |
914 |
|
| Expenses | ||||
| - staff costs | 485 |
305 |
290 |
|
| - other | 370 |
245 |
235 |
|
| Contribution before provisions | 861 |
570 |
389 |
|
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 95 |
69 |
40 |
|
| Contribution | 766 |
501 |
349 |
|
| Cost:income ratio (%) | 49.8 |
49.1 |
57.4
|
|
| Total assets ($bn) | 61.1 |
52.4 |
30.3 |
|
| Loans and advances to customers - gross ($bn) | 31.4 |
26.3 |
17.9 |
|
| Customer deposits ($bn) | 51.1 |
42.8 |
24.9 |
|
| Weighted risk assets ($bn) | 38.8 |
35.8 |
23.6 |
|
| Average exchange rate - $/£ | 1.503 |
1.440 |
1.516 |
|
| Spot exchange rate - $/£ | 1.613 |
1.450 |
1.493 |
|
| 2002
compared with 2001 Contribution increased by 53% or £265 million to £766 million. Excluding the incremental contribution of £219 million from the Mellon Regional Franchise and Medford (the “acquisitions”) and a £21 million adverse impact of exchange rate translation, contribution increased by 14% or £67 million. |
| Total income was up 53% or £596 million to £1,716 million. Excluding acquisitions and exchange rate fluctuations, organic income growth was 15% or £158 million. |
| Net interest income rose by 53% or £434 million to £1,248 million. Excluding acquisitions, which added £364 million, and exchange rate fluctuations, net interest income was up 14% or £104 million, as a result of strong organic growth in customer loans and deposits. |
| Non-interest income rose by 53% or £162 million to £468 million. Excluding acquisitions, which added £121 million, and movements in exchange rates, non-interest income was up 19% or £54 million, as a result of growth in deposit service charges and mortgage banking. |
| Expenses increased by 55% or £305 million to £855 million. Excluding acquisitions, which added £256 million, and exchange rate fluctuations, expenses increased by 14% or £72 million, to support higher business volumes. Citizens increased its in-store banking activities by opening new branches in 58 Stop&Shop supermarkets. The cost of establishing presence in these stores contributed to the increase in operating expenses. |
| The cost:income ratio increased from 49.1% to 49.8%. Excluding acquisitions and the impact of exchange rate translation, the underlying cost:income ratio improved from 48.7% to 48.2%. |
| Provisions were up from £69 million to £95 million. Excluding the Mellon Regional Franchise which added £10 million, provisions were broadly consistent with the second half of 2001. |
page 41
| 2001
compared with 2000 Contribution was up 44%, £152 million to £501 million reflecting strong organic growth and the strengthening of the dollar. At constant exchange rates, the increase was 37%, £134 million. The acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise, completed on 1 December 2001, contributed £13 million to this increase, £10.1 billion to customer deposits, £4.4 billion to customer loans and advances and added 345 branches to the Citizens network, bringing the total number of branches to 712 at 31 December 2001. |
| Net interest income rose by 22%, £147 million to £814 million due to growth in customer deposits and secured consumer lending. Non-interest income was up 24%, £59 million to £306 million reflecting growth in deposit service charges, mortgage banking and ATM and debit card income. |
| Expenses at £550 million were 5%, £25 million higher reflecting organic growth, the acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise and the effect of exchange rates. At constant exchange rates expenses declined by 1%, £3 million. The cost:income ratio improved from 57.4% to 49.1%. |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts were £69 million compared with £40 million in 2000, reflecting growth in lending and the economic environment in the US. |
| page 42 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Central items | |||||
2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
Pro
forma 2000* £m |
||
| Funding costs | 215 |
211 |
262 |
217 |
|
| Central department costs | |||||
| - staff costs | 108 |
99 |
86 |
114 |
|
| - other | 102 |
93 |
85 |
107 |
|
| Other corporate items - net | 162 |
83 |
192 |
226 |
|
| Total Central items | 587 |
486 |
625 |
664 |
|
| * | restated (see page 11) |
| The Centre comprises group and corporate functions which provide services to the operating divisions. |
| 2002
compared with 2001 Total Central items increased by £101 million to £587 million. |
| Funding costs, which include interest on the perpetual regulatory tier one securities issued in August 2001 of £60 million (2001 – £23 million) were similar to the previous year. This reflected the benefit of retained earnings and lower interest rates. |
| Other corporate items increased to £162 million compared with £83 million in 2001, which benefited from certain one-off items. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 Total Central items reduced by £139 million to £486 million. |
| Funding costs at £211 million were down 19%, £51 million. 2001 benefited from the proceeds of the share placing in July 2001 prior to deployment in the acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise, contributing £35 million. Other costs at £275 million declined £88 million, 24%, due largely to the benefit of integration initiatives. |
| 2001
compared with pro forma 2000 Total Central items reduced by £178 million to £486 million. |
| Funding costs at £211 million were down 3%, £6 million. 2001 benefited from the proceeds of the share placing in July 2001 prior to deployment in the Mellon Regional Franchise acquisition, contributing £35 million. |
| Central department costs at £192 million declined £29 million, 13%, due mainly to the benefit of integration initiatives. Other corporate items, which included certain one-off items in both years, reduced by 63%, £143 million to £83 million. |
page 43
| Employee numbers | |||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets* | 18,500 |
14,400 |
13,400 |
||
| Retail Banking | 30,100 |
30,500 |
28,900 |
||
| Retail Direct | 7,000 |
6,200 |
5,800 |
||
| Manufacturing | 19,800 |
20,700 |
19,200 |
||
| Wealth Management | 6,500 |
7,100 |
6,800 |
||
| Direct Line Group | 10,500 |
9,200 |
6,700 |
||
| Ulster Bank* | 4,400 |
4,500 |
4,300 |
||
| Citizens | 13,300 |
11,500 |
7,300 |
||
| Centre | 1,700 |
1,600 |
1,600 |
||
| Group total | 111,800 |
105,700 |
94,000 |
||
| * | Prior periods have been restated to reflect the transfer of Ulster Bank’s leasing business to Corporate Banking and Financial Markets. |
| 2002
compared with 2001 The number of employees increased by 6,100, 6% to 111,800 reflecting business growth and 5,600 from acquisitions, offset by staff reductions from integration. |
| 2001
compared with 2000 The number of employees in the Group rose by 11,700, 12% to 105,700. The increase reflects approximately 5,000 staff in businesses acquired in the year, as well as additional staff to support the growth in business levels and to deliver enhanced customer service in the branch networks. The total also includes short-term appointments in connection with the integration of NatWest. |
| page 44 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Integration information |
| 1 | NatWest
integration In the Offer Document for NatWest issued on 16 December 1999, the Group made various estimates in respect of revenue benefits, cost savings and staff reductions. Those estimates were based on the latest available published information at that time, namely NatWest interim accounts for the half year to 30 June 1999 and the Group’s accounts for the year to 30 September 1999. On 19 April 2000, the Group revised its estimates upwards as a consequence of the experience gained by having detailed access to NatWest following the acquisition on 6 March 2000. These revised estimates are shown in the tables below as “plan”. Subsequently the Group further revised the integration targets upwards in February 2002 for the remainder of the programme based on actual achievements. These targets are shown in the tables below as “revised plan”. |
| In February 2003 all integration initiatives were completed and the annualised benefits of £890 million for revenue benefits and £1,440 million for cost savings from the full programme achieved. |
| Period ending | |||||
| Revenue benefits | December 2000 |
December 2001 |
December 2002 |
March 2003 |
|
| Cumulative gross revenue initiatives implemented at the end of each period (£m) | |||||
| – plan | 120 | 350 | 550 | 595 | |
| – revised plan | 800 | 890 | |||
| – actual | 147 | 605 | 805 | ||
| December 2000 |
December 2001 |
December 2002 |
December 2003 |
||
| Impact on profit before tax (£m) | |||||
| – plan | 50 | 120 | 240 | 390 | |
| – revised plan | 460 | 590 | |||
| – actual | 52 | 312 | 472 | ||
| The gross revenue initiatives generated income of £712 million in the year to 31 December 2002 which, net of costs, claims and provisions added £472 million to profit before tax. |
| Period ending | |||||
| Cost savings | December 2000 |
December 2001 |
December 2002 |
March 2003 |
|
| Cumulative cost savings implemented at the end of each period (£m) | |||||
| – plan | 550 | 900 | 1,200 | 1,340 | |
| – revised plan | 1,340 | 1,440 | |||
| – actual | 653 | 1,205 | 1,350 | ||
| December 2000 |
December 2001 |
December 2002 |
December 2003 |
||
| Impact on profit before tax (£m) | |||||
| – plan | 290 | 700 | 1,050 | 1,300 | |
| – revised plan | 1,280 | 1,400 | |||
| – actual | 448 | 1,008 | 1,284 | ||
| Period ending | |||||
| Staff reductions | December 2000 |
December 2001 |
December 2002 |
March 2003 |
|
| Cumulative total | |||||
| – plan | 9,000 | 14,000 | 16,000 | 18,000 | |
| – revised plan | 18,000 | 18,000 | |||
| – actual | 13,000 | 17,000 | 18,000 | ||
| Period ending | |||||
| Integration costs | December 2000 |
December 2001 |
December 2002 |
March 2003 |
|
| Cumulative charge (£m) | |||||
| – plan | 650 | 1,150 | 1,350 | 1,400 | |
| – revised plan | 2,200 | 2,300 | |||
| – actual | 547 | 1,394 | 2,204 | ||
page 45
| 2 | Mellon
Regional Franchise integration In the announcement relating to the acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise issued on 17 July 2001, the Group disclosed various estimates in respect of cost savings and revenue benefits. Those estimates were based on the unaudited management accounts of the Mellon Regional Franchise for the four months ended 20 April 2001 and Citizens financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2000. These estimates were confirmed as part of the Group’s 2001 year end reporting. |
| Period ending | |||||
| Revenue benefits | December 2002 |
December 2003 |
December 2004 |
||
| Cumulative gross revenue initiatives implemented at the end of each period ($m) | |||||
| – plan | 57 | 136 | 242 | ||
| – actual | 70 | ||||
| Impact on profit before tax ($m) | |||||
| – plan | 2 | 34 | 104 | ||
| – actual | 19 | ||||
| The gross revenue initiatives generated income of $43 million in the year to 31 December 2002 which, net of costs, claims and provisions, added $19 million to profit before tax. |
| Period ending | |||||
| Cost savings | December 2002 |
December 2003 |
December 2004 |
||
| Cumulative cost savings implemented at the end of each period ($m) | |||||
| – plan | 71 | 95 | 101 | ||
| – actual | 95 | ||||
| Impact on profit before tax ($m) | |||||
| – plan | 46 | 83 | 98 | ||
| – actual | 70 | ||||
| Period ending | |||||
| Integration costs | December 2001 |
December 2002 |
December 2003 |
December 2004 |
|
| Cumulative charge ($m) | |||||
| – plan | 101 | 241 | 260 | 267 | |
| – actual | 41 | 239 | |||
| 2 | Medford Integration costs relating to the Medford acquisition amounted to $22 million. |
| The above discussions should be read in the light of the “forward-looking statements” cautionary note. |
| page 46 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Overview
of balance sheet Summary consolidated balance sheet at 31 December 2002 |
| 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
||
| Assets | |||
| Cash and balances at central banks and items in the course of collection from other banks | 6,222 | 6,381 | |
| Treasury bills and other eligible bills | 11,459 | 10,136 | |
| Loans and advances to banks | 44,296 | 38,513 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 223,324 | 190,492 | |
| Debt securities and equity shares | 68,928 | 65,597 | |
| Intangible fixed assets | 12,697 | 13,325 | |
| Other assets | 35,963 | 34,167 | |
| 402,889 | 358,611 | ||
| Long-term assurance assets attributable to policyholders | 9,111 | 10,248 | |
| Total assets | 412,000 | 368,859 | |
| Liabilities | |||
| Deposits by banks | 54,720 | 40,038 | |
| Items in the course of transmission to other banks | 1,258 | 2,109 | |
| Customer accounts | 219,161 | 198,995 | |
| Debt securities in issue | 33,938 | 30,669 | |
| Other liabilities | 50,956 | 47,017 | |
| Subordinated liabilities | 13,965 | 12,530 | |
| Minority interests including non-equity interests | 1,839 | 585 | |
| Shareholders’ funds including non-equity interests | 27,052 | 26,668 | |
| 402,889 | 358,611 | ||
| Long-term assurance liabilities attributable to policyholders | 9,111 | 10,248 | |
| Total liabilities | 412,000 | 368,859 | |
| Analysis by banking and trading businesses | |||
| Banking businesses | 311,488 | 284,471 | |
| Trading businesses | 100,512 | 84,388 | |
| 412,000 | 368,859 | ||
| Analysis of repurchase agreements included above | |||
| Reverse repurchase agreements and stock borrowing | |||
| Loans and advances to banks | 20,578 | 17,721 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 21,941 | 11,588 | |
| 42,519 | 29,309 | ||
| Repurchase agreements and stock lending | |||
| Deposits by banks | 20,097 | 10,446 | |
| Customer accounts | 25,060 | 17,455 | |
| 45,157 | 27,901 | ||
| * | restated (see page 10) |
page 47
| 2002
compared with 2001 Total assets of £412.0 billion at 31 December 2002 were up £43.1 billion, 12%, compared with 31 December 2001 due to business growth. |
| Treasury bills and other eligible bills increased by £1.3 billion, 13%, to £11.5 billion reflecting liquidity management partially offset by reduced trading activity. |
| Loans and advances to banks rose £5.8 billion, 15%, to £44.3 billion. Bank placings were up £2.9 billion, 14% to £23.7 billion and reverse repos increased by £2.9 billion, 16%, to £20.6 billion. |
| Loans and advances to customers were up £32.8 billion, 17%, to £223.3 billion, including reverse repos which increased £10.3 billion to £21.9 billion. Excluding reverse repos, lending increased by £22.5 billion, 13% to £201.4 billion. Growth in customer lending was across all divisions with increases of £11.8 billion in CBFM, £6.3 billion in Retail Banking, £2.6 billion in Retail Direct, £1.4 billion in Ulster Bank and £1.3 billion in Citizens. In $ terms, customer lending in Citizens was up 20% or $5.1 billion, including $0.6 billion arising from the acquisition of Medford. |
| Debt securities and equity shares increased by £3.3 billion, 5%, to £68.9 billion, principally due to increased holdings in Financial Markets, together with growth in Wealth Management’s investment portfolio of investment grade asset-backed securities and Citizens’ portfolio of US government securities. |
| Intangible fixed assets declined by £0.6 billion, 5% to £12.7 billion, primarily because of amortisation. Goodwill arising on acquisitions during the year, £0.4 billion, was largely offset by the effect of exchange rate movements. |
| All other assets rose by £1.6 billion, 4%, to £42.2 billion. Tangible fixed assets were up £1.7 billion, 19% to £10.5 billion mainly reflecting increased operating lease assets in CBFM. Growth in the mark-to-market value of trading derivatives, up £2.4 billion as a result of increased trading activity, was largely offset by lower settlement balances and other assets. |
| Long term assurance assets and liabilities attributable to policyholders declined £1.1 billion, 11% to £9.1 billion reflecting the fall in equity markets, partially offset by increased investments. |
| Deposits by banks increased by £14.7 billion, 37% to £54.7 billion, with repos up £9.7 billion, to £20.1 billion and inter-bank deposits up £5.0 billion, 17% to £34.6 billion. |
| Customer accounts were up £20.2 billion, 10% at £219.2 billion, including repos up £7.6 billion, 44% to £25.1 billion. Excluding repos, deposits rose £12.6 billion, 7% to £194.1 billion with increases of £5.8 billion in CBFM, £4.9 billion in Retail Banking and £1.6 billion in Citizens. In $ terms, Citizens grew by $7.0 billion, 18%, of which $1.1 billion related to Medford. |
| Debt securities in issue were up £3.3 billion, 11%, to £33.9 billion primarily to meet the Group’s funding requirements. |
| All other liabilities increased by £3.1 billion, 6% to £52.2 billion. Higher mark-to-market value of trading derivatives, up £3.7 billion, short positions, up £1.8 billion and accruals and deferred income, up £1.0 billion, were partially offset by lower settlement balances. |
| Subordinated liabilities were up £1.4 billion, 11% to £14.0 billion. The issue of £1.2 billion ($1,850 million) $ denominated and £0.1 billion (€230 million) € denominated dated loan capital and £0.8 billion £ denominated undated loan capital were partially offset by the £0.2 billion ($250 million and £40 million) redemption of dated loan capital and the effect of exchange rate movements of £0.5 billion. |
| Minority interests increased by £1.3 billion to £1.8 billion principally reflecting the issues of €1,250 million and $750 million trust preferred securities by subsidiaries of the Group. |
| Shareholders’ funds rose £0.4 billion to £27.1 billion principally due to retentions of £0.7 billion and the issue of £0.6 billion of equity shares in respect of scrip dividend and the exercise of share options, partly offset by the redemption of £0.6 billion non-equity preference shares in January 2002 and the adverse effect of exchange rate movements on share premium account, £0.3 billion. |
| page 48 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Cash flow |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 13,737 | 7,287 | 8,997 | ||||
| Dividends received from associated undertakings | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Returns on investment and servicing of finance | (1,901 | ) | (1,447 | ) | (1,005 | ) | |
| Taxation | (1,107 | ) | (1,209 | ) | (705 | ) | |
| Capital expenditure and financial investment | (9,185 | ) | (10,337 | ) | (5,119 | ) | |
| Acquisitions and disposals | (281 | ) | (1,653 | ) | (1,779 | ) | |
| Equity dividends paid | (729 | ) | (653 | ) | (386 | ) | |
| Financing | 2,711 | 4,411 | 4,604 | ||||
| Increase/(decrease) in cash | 3,246 | (3,600 | ) | 4,609 | |||
| 2002 The major factors contributing to the net cash inflow of £13,737 million from operating activities in 2002 were the operating profit of £4,763 million and an increase in deposits, debt securities in issue and other liabilities of £39,761 million, which were partially offset by the increase in loans and advances of £35,426 million. |
| The Additional Value Shares dividend of £798 million, interest payments of £674 million on subordinated liabilities and dividend payments on preference shares of £313 million were the main contributors to returns on investments and servicing of finance. |
| Net purchases of investment securities of £6,629 million and fixed assets of £2,556 million, including operating lease assets, comprised the net cash outflow from capital expenditure and financial investments. |
| The issue of £1,242 million trust preferred securities and £2,157 million subordinated debt, partially offset by the redemption of preference shares of £600 million and repayment of £202 million of subordinated debt were the main contributors to the net cash inflow from financing of £2,711 million. |
| 2001 Operating profit of £4,252 million and an increase of £31,721 million in deposits, debt securities in issue and other liabilities, partially offset by increases in loans and advances of £22,823 million and in treasury and other eligible bills of £6,796 million, were the major factors in the net cash inflow from operating activities of £7,287 million. |
| The first dividend on the Additional Value Shares of £399 million, interest of £652 million on subordinated liabilities and dividend payments on preference shares of £353 million contributed to the outflow of £1,447 from returns on investment and servicing of finance. |
| Net cash outflow from capital expenditure and financial investment consisted of net purchases of investment securities of £6,959 million and fixed assets, including operating lease assets, of £3,378 million. |
| The issue of £2,705 million of subordinated debt and £2,131 million proceeds from the issue of shares, including a market placing of £2,007 million, in July 2001, to fund the acquisition of the Mellon Regional Franchise, were the main contributors to the net cash inflow from financing of £4,411 million. |
| 2000 The major factors contributing to the net cash inflow of £8,997 million from operating activities in 2000 were the operating profit of £2,970 million, an increase in deposits of £25,667 million and decrease in bank lending of £9,720 million, which were partially offset by the increase in customer loans and advances of £22,014 million and decrease in debt securities in issue and other liabilities of £6,799 million. |
| Interest payments of £739 million on subordinated liabilities and dividend payments of £228 million on preference shares were the main contributors to returns on investments and servicing of finance. |
| Net purchase of investment securities of £4,385 million and fixed assets of £734 million, including operating lease assets, comprised the net cash outflow from capital expenditure and financial investment. |
| The issue of £4,681 million ordinary and preference share capital, primarily to fund the acquisition of NatWest, together with the issue of £294 million subordinated debt were partially offset by the redemption of preference shares of £300 million and repayment of £146 million of subordinated debt, and were the main contributors to the net cash inflow from financing of £4,604 million. |
page 49
| UK
GAAP compared with US GAAP The Group’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which differs in certain material respects from US GAAP. |
| The net income available for ordinary shareholders under US GAAP was £3,108 million, £1,137 million higher than profit attributable to ordinary shareholders under UK GAAP of £1,971 million. The principal reasons for the increase are: |
| • | US GAAP requires all derivatives to be recorded at fair value and changes in fair value recognised currently in earnings unless certain hedge conditions are met. The Group has not changed its use of non-trading derivatives to meet these conditions. Therefore, under US GAAP, the Group’s portfolio of non-trading derivatives has been remeasured to fair value with changes in fair value included in net income together with gains and losses on non-trading derivatives deferred under UK GAAP. Additionally, under US GAAP, certain derivatives embedded in other instruments are accounted for separately and non-derivative financial instruments cannot be designated as a hedge of the foreign exchange exposure of available-for-sale securities. The resulting adjustment increases US GAAP net income before tax by £770 million. |
| • | Goodwill amortisation is charged to the profit and loss account under UK GAAP, whereas under US GAAP only intangible assets other than goodwill are amortised, resulting in an increase in net income before tax of £681 million. |
| • | Certain software development costs have been charged to the profit and loss account under UK GAAP; under US GAAP such costs are capitalised and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the software, resulting in a net increase in net income before tax of £283 million. |
| Capital
resources The following table analyses the Group’s regulatory capital resources at the period end: |
| 31
December 2002 £m |
31
December 2001 £m |
31
December 2000 £m |
30
September 1999 £m |
30
September 1998 £m |
|||||||
| Capital base | |||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 17,155 | 15,052 | 12,071 | 4,605 | 3,235 | ||||||
| Tier 2 capital | 13,271 | 11,734 | 10,082 | 3,256 | 2,950 | ||||||
| Tier 3 capital | - | 172 | 167 | - | - | ||||||
| 30,426 | 26,958 | 22,320 | 7,861 | 6,185 | |||||||
| Less
investments in insurance subsidiaries, associated undertakings and other supervisory deductions |
(3,146 | ) | (2,698 | ) | (2,228 | ) | (1,011) | (703 | ) | ||
| Total capital | 27,280 | 24,260 | 20,092 | 6,850 | 5,482 | ||||||
| Weighted risk assets | |||||||||||
| Banking book: | |||||||||||
| On-balance sheet | 193,800 | 176,000 | 146,600 | 51,200 | 44,300 | ||||||
| Off-balance sheet | 28,700 | 22,000 | 16,200 | 4,200 | 3,500 | ||||||
| Trading book | 11,500 | 12,500 | 12,400 | 1,400 | 1,300 | ||||||
| 234,000 | 210,500 | 175,200 | 56,800 | 49,100 | |||||||
| Risk asset ratios | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Tier 1 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 8.1 | 6.6 | ||||||
| Total | 11.7 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 12.1 | 11.2 | ||||||
| It is the Group’s policy to maintain a strong capital base, to expand it as appropriate and to utilise it efficiently throughout its activities to optimise the return to shareholders while maintaining a prudent relationship between the capital base and the underlying risks of the business. In carrying out this policy, the Group has regard to the supervisory requirements of the Financial Services Authority (“FSA”). The FSA uses Risk Asset Ratio (“RAR”) as a measure of capital adequacy in the UK banking sector, comparing a bank’s capital resources with its weighted risk assets (the assets and off-balance sheet exposures are ‘weighted’to reflect the inherent credit and other risks); by international agreement, the RAR should be not less than 8% with a tier 1 component of not less than 4%. At 31 December 2002, the Group’s total RAR was 11.7% (2001 – 11.5%) and the tier 1 RAR was 7.3% (2001 – 7.1%). |
| page 50 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Risk
management The management of risk is a fundamental management activity performed throughout the Group. As such it underpins the Group’s reputation, performance and future success. It is therefore critically important that the adequacy and effectiveness of our risk management processes are of appropriate standard. |
| To achieve this the Group has put in place a risk management framework comprising: |
| • | Leadership, strategy and culture set by the Board and put into effect through Executive Management. |
| • | Policies, procedures, processes and systems to execute effective risk management throughout the Group. |
| • | A comprehensive committee structure operating at Group level to direct, approve and review actions taken to manage risk. Where appropriate this is replicated at a divisional level. |
| • | Risk management functions that are independent of the business management to enforce agreed policy. |
| Supporting the Board, the following executive committees operate that have risk management as partly or wholly their mandate: |
| • | Group Executive Management Committee (“GEMC”), a sub-committee of the Board determines the Group’s risk management framework. |
| • | Group Risk Management Committee (“GRMC”), a sub-committee of the GEMC, provides leadership and oversight of the Group’s risk management and control process, including policies and risk appetite. |
| • | Group Credit Committee (“GCC”), a sub-committee of the Board, approves facility limits in excess of the authorities delegated to business Credit Committees and makes recommendations to the Board for facilities in excess of its own authority. |
| • | The Group Asset and Liability Management Committee (“GALCO”), a sub-committee of the GEMC, sets policy for the management of the overall Group balance sheet in respect of capital ratios, structural hedging and liquidity. |
| The Group Risk Management function plays a key role in the Group’s Risk Management framework. The Group Risk Management function is independent from the businesses and reports through the Group Finance Director to the Group Chief Executive. |
| Within each Division independent risk management units operate, reporting to both divisional executive management and the Director, Group Risk Management. An assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of each divisional risk management unit is undertaken by Group Risk Management on a continuous basis to ensure effective control. |
| Supporting GALCO, Group Treasury is responsible for capital raising, liquidity and structural hedging policies and the management of the Group’s balance sheet. Operational responsibility for asset and liability management is in turn delegated to appropriate management in each major business grouping. |
| The most significant risks managed by the Group are: |
| • | Credit risk: the risk arising from the possibility that the Group will incur losses from the failure of a customer to meet its obligations. |
| • | Liquidity risk: the risk that the Group will be unable to meet its funding requirements at acceptable rates and appropriate maturities. |
| • | Market risk: the risk arising from the possibility that the Group will incur losses from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates or the prices of equity shares and indices, commodities, debt securities and other financial contracts, including derivatives. |
| • | Regulatory risk: the risk of material loss, reputational damage or liability arising from the Group’s failure to comply with the requirements of the Group’s regulators and relevant Codes of Best Practice that oversee the conduct of regulated business in all geographic regions where the Group has operations. |
| • | Enterprise risk: the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Insurance risk arising from insurance as a source of risk and as a tool to reduce other risk exposure is also managed as part of enterprise risk. |
page 51
| Group Risk Management is also responsible for the Group wide coordination of the Group’s response to key regulatory developments affecting risk and capital management. In carrying out this responsibility, Group Risk Management coordinates across the Group Risk Management, Group Treasury and Group Finance functions. Key regulatory developments, which are explained in greater detail under Supervision and regulation on page 163, are the New Basel Accord and the related EU Capital Adequacy Directive, the FSA’s Integrated Prudential Sourcebook and the EU Financial Conglomerates Directive. |
| Effective coordination and control of the Group’s internal and external approach to these regulatory developments are ensured through the oversight of executive and divisional steering committees and through a Programme team which has been established within Group Risk Management. The Group is represented and actively participates in the international and UK industry associations providing input on these regulatory developments to the Basel Committee, EU Commission and the FSA. In addressing these regulatory changes, the Group’s objective is to ensure that the ways it decides to enhance its risk and capital management practices to meet its own internal requirements will also result in the Group being well positioned to meet the demands of current and future regulatory regimes. |
| Credit
risk Credit risk is the risk arising from the possibility that the Group will incur losses from the failure of a customer to meet its obligations. |
| This risk is managed within the Group’s Credit Risk Management framework comprising: |
| • | Executive involvement through the GRMC. |
| • | The Group’s principles for managing credit risk. |
| • | The Group’s credit approval processes and credit assessments. |
| • | Credit portfolio management. |
| • | The review and oversight of delegated authorities. |
| • | Problem exposure management. |
| Executive involvement through the GRMC This sub-committee of the GEMC is chaired by the Group Finance Director and includes other executive directors. It defines the credit risk strategy of the Group and approves both policy changes and other enhancements to the credit risk management framework. On a day-to-day basis, executive directors and other GEMC members participate in the Group, divisional and subsidiary company Credit Committees. These committees hold the highest levels of credit authority (below Board level) in the Group. |
| The Group’s principles for managing credit risk set out minimum standards for managing credit risk. These include principles for maintaining the credit culture of the Group, approving credit risk taken by the Group, credit stewardship and reviewing the effectiveness of the credit culture. As a minimum: |
| • | All credit risk exposures require approval before assumption by the Group. Existing credit risk exposures are monitored and reviewed periodically against approved risk limits. Review occurs at least annually with the lower quality exposures being subject to greater frequency of analysis and assessment. Approvals in respect of credit exposure can only be given by duly authorised individuals or bodies (Credit Committees) or if below certain specified thresholds through authorised automated processes. |
| • | Credit authority is delegated only to competent individuals who are independent of business revenue generation or to established credit committees. Other than in specialist areas which operate under strict parameters, credit authority is not extended to branch or account relationship managers. |
| • | Credit risk exposures originated anywhere in the Group that create obligations from the same customer group are aggregated (subject to de minimis thresholds) in order to determine the appropriate level of credit approval required and to facilitate consolidated credit risk management. |
| • | Customers are assigned a credit rating, which is mapped to a Group scale that reflects the probability of default. |
| page 52 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Credit approval processes exist for each of the significant customer types in order to ensure appropriate skills and resources are employed in credit assessment and approval: |
| • | Retail and personal businesses use industry standard credit scoring techniques, adapted for the Group, to process small scale, large volume credit decisions. These are combined with traditional analysis and judgment to support more significant credit risks in this area. |
| • | Credit approvals for the professional counterparties of Financial Markets are supported by a dedicated credit function, which provides expertise in traded markets product risk and which specialises in the analysis and assessment of financial institutions. |
| • | For the Group’s corporate businesses, the relationship management team, the Analysis Rating and Research Unit and the Credit Risk Department, support the judgment exercised over credit approvals. |
| The balance between risk and reward is managed by the credit approval process and appropriate risk adjusted return measurement tools. |
| Credit portfolio management The business units and the GEMC review monthly reports on the Group’s portfolio of credit risks. Portfolio information is examined principally by the quality of credit ratings but is also further sub-divided by major division/subsidiary, by geography and by industrial sector. Expected loss and other statistical tools are used in trend analysis. |
| The review and oversight of delegated authorities Both Group Risk Management and divisional credit risk functions undertake reviews in order to provide independent oversight of delegated authorities and to ensure compliance with Group practice. |
| Problem exposure management is facilitated through specialised units, which provide intensive management to minimise the incidence of credit risk losses. Credit management within each business unit is the responsibility of business unit Credit Committees and specialist units within the Group provide appropriate management and control over the Group’s impaired and potential problem loans. |
| • | In the Group’s corporate businesses, problem loans and exposures are managed by Specialised Lending Services, which provides dedicated resource experienced in corporate restructuring. The Problem Exposure Review Forum reviews all such significant cases at least annually. This group is chaired by the Group Chief Executive and includes the appropriate divisional executive, account managers and credit managers. |
| • | The Group’s retail businesses operate automated triggers and filters as part of the monthly monitoring of all accounts. Identified problems are then managed through prescribed processes by centralised credit management units. |
| Residual value risk The Group’s asset finance activities also expose the Group to risk of loss if the value of the physical asset at the end of the financing term is less than that required to achieve the planned return. The Group mitigates this risk through portfolio diversification and active management of asset exposures throughout their life, from pricing through to re-marketing at the end of the transaction term. |
| Loan portfolio The Group’s loan portfolio consists of loans (including overdraft facilities), instalment credit and finance lease receivables. |
| Overdraft facilities provide the customer with a demand deposit account and demand credit facility combined in a single checking (current) account. An overdraft is effected whenever a customer’s drawings on a demand deposit account exceed the credit balance of the account, the balance of which may alternate between debit and credit. While overdrafts are contractually repayable on demand, unless a fixed term has been agreed, in practice customers will from time to time make deposits into the account thereby reducing indebtedness or increasing a credit balance in accordance with their requirements. Borrowing limits on the overdraft facility are established and full repayment is normally only required if the customer fails to honour the conditions on which the limit was granted or their financial position has so deteriorated such that it is necessary to take protective action. Overdraft facilities are usually reviewed at least annually. Interest is generally calculated on the daily outstanding balance by reference to the Group’s base rate and is typically charged monthly. Overdrafts accounted for approximately 10.7% of the Group’s total domestic loan portfolio at 31 December 2002 (2001 – 12.6%; 2000 – 11.0%). |
page 53
| Provisioning policy The Group’s approach to managing credit risk is discussed under ‘Credit risk’ above and its accounting policy for loans and advances is set out on page 94. The Group provides for losses existing in its lending book to record loans and advances at their expected ultimate net realisable value. |
| Specific provisions are made against loans when, as a result of review, it is considered that recovery is in serious doubt. Each loan portfolio is considered and monitored separately using a variety of systems, reports and models. |
| • | Homogeneous portfolios, including credit card receivables and mortgages, comprise a significant proportion of the Group’s loans. Provisions on these portfolios are calculated using a formulaic approach based on number of days in arrears and the predicted risk of loss on the loan. |
| • | For other portfolios, customers are assigned a credit grading which is mapped on to the Group scale. Credit grades are reviewed at least annually. Where deterioration is detected, the credit is downgraded as appropriate. If it is determined that more intensive management is required, the credit is passed to a specialist unit. Specific provision is made where a review of the advance reveals that the credit-worthiness of the borrower has undergone a significant deterioration and that recovery of the advance is in significant doubt taking account of available security. This review will also consider the cancellation or reduction of unutilised limits, the appointment of an investigating accountant and other actions that are designed to mitigate the credit risk faced by the Group. The amount of the specific provision will reflect the financial condition of the borrower, the realisable value of any security and the costs of recovery or realisation of that security as at the balance sheet date. |
| The Group establishes a general provision through charges to the profit and loss account in order to cover losses that have not been specifically identified but are known from experience to be present in any portfolio of loans. The level of general provision reflects the size and diversity of the Group’s loan portfolio, past experience, the current state of the economies in which the Group operates and the scope of specific provisioning procedures. |
| The Group monitors its credit loss experience in each of its loan portfolios. The assumptions used to determine the level of provisions, in homogeneous portfolios and in other portfolios, are adjusted to reflect the actual experience. |
| Bad and doubtful debt provisions made during the year (less amounts released and recoveries of amounts written-off in previous years) are charged to the profit and loss account. Where the collectability of interest is in doubt it is not credited to the profit and loss account but to a suspense account. Loans classified as bad debts and any related suspended interest are written-down to their estimated net realisable value when it is identified that there is no realistic prospect of recovery of all or part of the loan. There are differences in accounting practices between UK and US banks. In the UK, loans and the related accrued interest are written-off only when, as a matter of banking judgment, there is no realistic prospect of recovery. When management determines that a write-off is appropriate, the principal amount and accrued interest on the obligation are written down their to estimated net realisable value. Banks in the US may write-off impaired lending more quickly. In the UK, interest receivable on loans is recognised as income as it accrues provided that its collectability is not subject to significant doubt. In contrast, banks in the US typically cease accruing interest when loans become overdue by 90 days. The effect of these differences is that the Group’s gross lendings, its provisions for bad and doubtful debts and provision cover ratios may be greater than would be the case using US practice. |
| An analysis of the Group’s loans and advances to customers before provisions is contained on page 54. An analysis of provisions for bad and doubtful debts, write-offs and recoveries is also included on pages 55 to 57. The Group’s loan control and review procedure do not include the classification of loans as non-accrual, accruing past due, restructured and potential problem loans, as defined by the SEC in the US. The table on page 58 shows the estimated amount of loans which would be reported using the SEC’c classifications. |
| Cross border outstandings and selected country exposures The Group proactively manages its country risk exposure with the view to minimising exposures to countries which may be adversely affected by global economic pressure. An analysis of these countries is contained in page 59. Cross border outstandings in excess of 0.75% of Group total assets (including acceptances) are disclosed on page 59. |
| page 54 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Analysis of loans and advances to customers The following table analyses loans and advances to customers before provisions by remaining maturity, geographical area and type of customer. Overdrafts are included in the ‘Within 1 year’category. |
| Within 1 year £m |
After
1 but within 5 years £m |
After 5 years £m |
31
December 2002 Total £m |
31
December 2001 £m |
31
December 2000 £m |
30
September 1999 £m |
30
September 1998 £m |
||||||||||||
| UK | |||||||||||||||||||
| Central and local government | 1,514 | 3 | 4 | 1,521 | 706 | 1,957 | 150 | 78 | |||||||||||
| Manufacturing | 5,632 | 827 | 927 | 7,386 | 7,401 | 6,806 | 2,715 | 2,075 | |||||||||||
| Construction | 2,257 | 692 | 519 | 3,468 | 3,018 | 2,615 | 648 | 543 | |||||||||||
| Finance | 10,042 | 1,133 | 1,221 | 12,396 | 8,517 | 9,944 | 2,891 | 2,197 | |||||||||||
| Service industries and | |||||||||||||||||||
| business activities | 13,726 | 4,685 | 7,611 | 26,022 | 25,033 | 20,903 | 8,062 | 6,979 | |||||||||||
| Agriculture, forestry and fishing | 1,295 | 476 | 692 | 2,463 | 2,391 | 2,373 | 673 | 643 | |||||||||||
| Property | 7,697 | 3,346 | 4,896 | 15,939 | 12,274 | 10,415 | 3,668 | 2,935 | |||||||||||
| Individuals - home mortgages | 1,579 | 3,513 | 37,009 | 42,101 | 36,976 | 32,600 | 9,544 | 8,317 | |||||||||||
| - other | 11,173 | 6,943 | 4,139 | 22,255 | 20,076 | 17,881 | 6,283 | 4,550 | |||||||||||
| Finance
leases and instalment credit |
2,809 | 4,520 | 4,394 | 11,723 | 11,258 | 10,816 | 3,614 | 3,487 | |||||||||||
| Total domestic | 57,724 | 26,138 | 61,412 | 145,274 | 127,650 | 116,310 | 38,248 | 31,804 | |||||||||||
| Overseas residents | 21,005 | 853 | 1,799 | 23,657 | 24,164 | 19,257 | 2,799 | 2,248 | |||||||||||
| Total UK offices | 78,729 | 26,991 | 63,211 | 168,931 | 151,814 | 135,567 | 41,047 | 34,052 | |||||||||||
| Overseas | |||||||||||||||||||
| US | 21,525 | 10,101 | 9,382 | 41,008 | 29,230 | 23,050 | 6,807 | 5,811 | |||||||||||
| Rest of the World | 10,726 | 3,272 | 3,307 | 17,305 | 13,093 | 12,598 | 2,223 | 1,787 | |||||||||||
| Total overseas offices | 32,251 | 13,373 | 12,689 | 58,313 | 42,323 | 35,648 | 9,030 | 7,598 | |||||||||||
| Loans and advances | |||||||||||||||||||
| to customers - gross | 110,980 | 40,364 | 75,900 | 227,244 | 194,137 | 171,215 | 50,077 | 41,650 | |||||||||||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | (3,920 | ) | (3,645 | ) | (3,139 | ) | (737 | ) | (633 | ) | |||||||||
| Loans and advances | |||||||||||||||||||
| to customers - net | 223,324 | 190,492 | 168,076 | 49,340 | 41,017 | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | 38,315 | 16,179 | 25,832 | 80,326 | 62,282 | 53,983 | 15,959 | 11,738 | |||||||||||
| Variable rate | 72,665 | 24,185 | 50,068 | 146,918 | 131,855 | 117,232 | 34,118 | 29,912 | |||||||||||
| Gross loans and advances | |||||||||||||||||||
| to customers - by maturity | 110,980 | 40,364 | 75,900 | 227,244 | 194,137 | 171,215 | 50,077 | 41,650 | |||||||||||
page 55
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts For a discussion of the factors considered in determining the amount of the provisions, see ‘Provisioning policy’on page 53. The following table shows the elements of provisions for bad and doubtful debts. |
| 31
December 2002 £m |
31
December 2001 £m |
31
December 2000 £m |
3
months ended 31 December 1999 £m |
30
September 1999 £m |
30
September 1998 £m |
||||||||||
| Provisions at the beginning of the period | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 2,467 | 2,370 | 484 | 433 | 347 | 316 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 1,186 | 783 | 332 | 304 | 286 | 143 | |||||||||
| 3,653 | 3,153 | 816 | 737 | 633 | 459 | ||||||||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | (4 | ) | 4 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||
| Foreign | (58 | ) | 13 | 43 | 2 | 10 | (8 | ) | |||||||
| (62 | ) | 17 | 42 | 2 | 10 | (8 | ) | ||||||||
| Acquisitions of businesses | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 11 | 83 | 1,871 | 2 | - | - | |||||||||
| Foreign | 12 | 171 | 494 | 23 | - | (11 | ) | ||||||||
| 23 | 254 | 2,365 | 25 | - | (11 | ) | |||||||||
| Amounts written-off | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | (743 | ) | (645 | ) | (599 | ) | (35 | ) | (175 | ) | (144 | ) | |||
| Foreign | (293 | ) | (190 | ) | (185 | ) | (5 | ) | (51 | ) | (26 | ) | |||
| (1,036 | ) | (835 | ) | (784 | ) | (40 | ) | (226 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||
| Recoveries
of amounts written-off in previous periods |
|||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 37 | 54 | 142 | 10 | 44 | 20 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 26 | 26 | 22 | 3 | 10 | 15 | |||||||||
| 63 | 80 | 164 | 13 | 54 | 35 | ||||||||||
| Charged to profit and loss account | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 813 | 601 | 473 | 74 | 217 | 155 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 473 | 383 | 77 | 5 | 49 | 173 | |||||||||
| 1,286 | 984 | 550 | 79 | 266 | 328 | ||||||||||
| Provisions at the end of the period (1) | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 2,581 | 2,467 | 2,370 | 484 | 433 | 347 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 1,346 | 1,186 | 783 | 332 | 304 | 286 | |||||||||
| 3,927 | 3,653 | 3,153 | 816 | 737 | 633 | ||||||||||
| Gross loans and advances to customers | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 145,274 | 127,650 | 116,310 | 41,045 | 38,248 | 31,804 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 81,970 | 66,487 | 54,905 | 13,892 | 11,829 | 9,846 | |||||||||
| 227,244 | 194,137 | 171,215 | 54,937 | 50,077 | 41,650 | ||||||||||
| Closing
customer provisions as a % of gross loans |
|||||||||||||||
| and advances to customers (2) | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 1.78 | % | 1.93 | % | 2.04 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.09 | % | |||
| Foreign | 1.63 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.40 | % | 2.39 | % | 2.57 | % | 2.90 | % | |||
| Total | 1.73 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.49 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.52 | % | |||
| Customer
charge against profit as a % of gross loans |
|||||||||||||||
| and advances to customers | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 0.56 | % | 0.47 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.49 | % | |||
| Foreign | 0.58 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.41 | % | 1.76 | % | |||
| Total | 0.57 | % | 0.51 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.79 | % | |||
(1) |
Notes: Includes closing provisions against loans and advances to banks of £7 million (31 December 2001 – £8 million; 31 December 2000 - £14 million). |
| (2) | Closing customer provisions exclude closing provisions against loans and advances to banks. |
| page 56 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts (continued) The following table presents additional information with respect to the provisions for bad and doubtful debts. |
| 31
December
|
30
September
|
||||||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
1998 £m |
|||||||||
| Loans and advances to customers (gross) | 227,244 | 194,137 | 171,215 | 50,077 | 41,650 | ||||||||
| Provisions at end of period: | |||||||||||||
| Specific provisions - customers | 3,323 | 3,031 | 2,571 | 567 | 454 | ||||||||
| Specific provisions - banks | 7 | 8 | 14 | - | - | ||||||||
| General provision | 597 | 614 | 568 | 170 | 179 | ||||||||
| 3,927 | 3,653 | 3,153 | 737 | 633 | |||||||||
| Customer provision at end of period as % of loans and | |||||||||||||
| advances to customers at end of period: | |||||||||||||
| Specific provisions | 1.47 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.09 | % | |||
| General provision | 0.26 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.43 | % | |||
| 1.73 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.52 | % | ||||
| Average loans and advances to customers (gross) | 211,206 | 181,584 | 142,288 | 45,807 | 39,456 | ||||||||
| As a % of average loans and advances to customers during the period: | |||||||||||||
| Total customer provisions charged to profit and loss | 0.61 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.83 | % | |||
| Amounts written-off (net of recoveries) - customers | 0.46 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.34 | % | |||
| Analysis of closing provisions for bad and doubtful debts The following table analyses customer provisions for bad and doubtful debts by geographical area and type of domestic customer. |
| 31
December
|
30
September
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
1998
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Closing provision £m |
%
of loans to total loans % |
Closing provision £m |
%
of loans to total loans % |
Closing provision £m |
%
of loans to total loans % |
Closing provision £m |
%
of loans to total loans % |
Closing provision £m |
%
of loans to total loans % |
||||||||||||||
| Domestic | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Central and local government | - | 0.6 | - | 0.4 | - | 1.1 | - | 0.3 | - | 0.3 | |||||||||||||
| Manufacturing | 205 | 3.2 | 209 | 3.8 | 148 | 4.0 | 16 | 5.4 | 16 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||
| Construction | 65 | 1.5 | 72 | 1.6 | 77 | 1.5 | 8 | 1.3 | 9 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||
| Finance | 71 | 5.5 | 73 | 4.4 | 75 | 5.8 | 4 | 5.8 | 3 | 5.3 | |||||||||||||
| Service industries and business activities | 699 | 11.5 | 627 | 12.9 | 665 | 12.2 | 124 | 16.1 | 95 | 16.7 | |||||||||||||
| Agriculture, forestry and fishing | 29 | 1.1 | 31 | 1.2 | 33 | 1.4 | 3 | 1.4 | 2 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||
| Property | 40 | 7.0 | 39 | 6.3 | 55 | 6.1 | 11 | 7.3 | 13 | 7.0 | |||||||||||||
| Individuals - home mortgages | 60 | 18.5 | 53 | 19.1 | 35 | 19.0 | 22 | 19.1 | 17 | 20.0 | |||||||||||||
| - other | 855 | 9.8 | 855 | 10.3 | 797 | 10.5 | 167 | 12.5 | 121 | 10.9 | |||||||||||||
| Finance leases and instalment credit | 208 | 5.2 | 164 | 5.8 | 149 | 6.3 | 12 | 7.2 | 7 | 8.4 | |||||||||||||
| Total domestic | 2,232 | 63.9 | 2,123 | 65.8 | 2,034 | 67.9 | 367 | 76.4 | 283 | 76.4 | |||||||||||||
| Foreign | 1,091 | 36.1 | 908 | 34.2 | 537 | 32.1 | 200 | 23.6 | 171 | 23.6 | |||||||||||||
| Specific provisions | 3,323 | 100.0 | 3,031 | 100.0 | 2,571 | 100.0 | 567 | 100.0 | 454 | 100.0 | |||||||||||||
| General provision | 597 | 614 | 568 | 170 | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions | 3,920 | 3,645 | 3,139 | 737 | 633 | ||||||||||||||||||
page 57
| Analysis of write-offs The following table analyses amounts written-off by geographical area and type of domestic customer. |
| Year
ended 31 December
|
Year
ended 30 September
|
||||||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
1998 £m |
|||||||||
| Domestic | |||||||||||||
| Manufacturing | 111 | 61 | 55 | 4 | 11 | ||||||||
| Construction | 18 | 19 | 30 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| Finance | 35 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
| Service industries and business activities | 180 | 176 | 146 | 38 | 41 | ||||||||
| Agriculture, forestry and fishing | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
| Property | 9 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| Individuals - home mortgages | 2 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 5 | ||||||||
| - others | 333 | 297 | 230 | 107 | 70 | ||||||||
| Finance leases and instalment credit | 45 | 62 | 109 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||
| Total domestic | 743 | 645 | 599 | 175 | 144 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 293 | 190 | 185 | 51 | 26 | ||||||||
| Total write-offs* | 1,036 | 835 | 784 | 226 | 170 | ||||||||
| * | Includes amounts written-off in respect of banks of £1 million (2001 – £6 million; 2000 – £5 million). |
| Analysis of recoveries The following table analyses recoveries of amounts written-off by geographical area and type of domestic customer. |
| Year
ended 31 December
|
Year
ended 30 September
|
||||||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
1998 £m |
|||||||||
| Domestic | |||||||||||||
| Manufacturing | 1 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||
| Construction | - | 1 | 13 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| Finance | - | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | ||||||||
| Service industries and business activities | 1 | 5 | 45 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||
| Agriculture, forestry and fishing | - | - | 3 | - | - | ||||||||
| Property | 1 | 1 | 6 | - | 1 | ||||||||
| Individuals - home mortgages | - | - | - | 1 | - | ||||||||
| - others | 27 | 41 | 57 | 28 | 8 | ||||||||
| Finance leases and instalment credit | 7 | 3 | 3 | - | - | ||||||||
| Total domestic | 37 | 54 | 142 | 44 | 20 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 26 | 26 | 22 | 10 | 15 | ||||||||
| Total recoveries | 63 | 80 | 164 | 54 | 35 | ||||||||
| page 58 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Risk elements in lending and potential problem loans The Group’s loan control and review procedures do not include the classification of loans as non-accrual, accruing past due, restructured and potential problem loans, as defined by the SEC in the US. The following table shows the estimated amount of loans that would be reported using the SEC’s classifications. The figures incorporate estimates and are stated before deducting the value of security held or related provisions. |
| 31
December 2002 £m |
31
December 2001 £m |
31
December 2000 £m |
30
September 1999 £m |
30
September 1998 £m |
|||||||||
| Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis (3): | |||||||||||||
| Domestic | 3,077 | 2,829 | 2,482 | 378 | 416 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 1,098 | 737 | 344 | 170 | 148 | ||||||||
| Total | 4,175 | 3,566 | 2,826 | 548 | 564 | ||||||||
| Accruing loans which are contractually overdue 90 days | |||||||||||||
| or more as to principal or interest (4): | |||||||||||||
| Domestic | 363 | 643 | 662 | 322 | 311 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 129 | 142 | 168 | 110 | 117 | ||||||||
| Total | 492 | 785 | 830 | 432 | 428 | ||||||||
| Loans not included above which are classified | |||||||||||||
| as ‘troubled debt restructurings’ by the SEC: | |||||||||||||
| Domestic | 144 | 26 | 43 | 13 | 15 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 60 | 116 | 122 | 104 | 5 | ||||||||
| Total | 204 | 142 | 165 | 117 | 20 | ||||||||
| Total risk elements in lending | 4,871 | 4,493 | 3,821 | 1,097 | 1,012 | ||||||||
| Potential problem loans (5) | |||||||||||||
| Domestic | 639 | 801 | 699 | 171 | 98 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 544 | 279 | 73 | 75 | 45 | ||||||||
| 1,183 | 1,080 | 772 | 246 | 143 | |||||||||
| Closing provisions for bad and doubtful debts as | |||||||||||||
| a % of total risk elements in lending | 81 | % | 81 | % | 83 | % | 67 | % | 63 | % | |||
| Risk elements in lending as a % of gross loans | |||||||||||||
| and advances to customers | 2.14 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.23 | % | 2.19 | % | 2.43 | % | |||
(1) |
Notes: For the analysis above, ‘Domestic’consists of the UK domestic transactions of the Group. ‘Foreign’ comprises the Group’s transactions conducted through offices outside the UK and through those offices in the UK specifically organised to service international banking transactions. |
| (2) | The classification of a loan as non-accrual, past due 90 days or troubled debt restructuring does not necessarily indicate that the principal of the loan is uncollectable in whole or in part. Collection depends in each case on the individual circumstances of the loan, including the adequacy of any collateral securing the loan and therefore classification of a loan as non-accrual, past due 90 days or troubled debt restructuring does not always require that a provision be made against such a loan. In accordance with the Group’s provisioning policy for bad and doubtful debts, it is considered that adequate provisions for the above risk elements in lending have been made. |
| (3) | The Group’s UK banking subsidiary undertakings account for loans on a non-accrual basis from the point in time at which the collectability of interest is in significant doubt. Certain subsidiary undertakings of the Group, principally Citizens, generally account for loans on a non-accrual basis when interest or principal is past due 90 days. |
| (4) | Overdrafts generally have no fixed repayment schedule and consequently are not included in this category. |
| (5) | Loans that are current as to the payment of principal and interest but in respect of which management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrower to comply with contractual repayment terms. Substantial security is held in respect of these loans and appropriate provisions have already been made in accordance with the Group’s provisioning policy for bad and doubtful debts. |
| Year
ended 31 December
|
Year
ended 30 September
|
||||||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
1998 £m |
|||||||||
| Gross income not recognised but which would have been | |||||||||||||
| recognised under the original terms of non-accrual and | |||||||||||||
| restructured loans | |||||||||||||
| Domestic | 234 | 173 | 148 | 53 | 57 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 73 | 60 | 48 | 32 | 20 | ||||||||
| 307 | 233 | 196 | 85 | 77 | |||||||||
| Interest on non-accrual and restructured loans included in | |||||||||||||
| net interest income | |||||||||||||
| Domestic | 47 | 42 | 30 | 4 | 14 | ||||||||
| Foreign | 7 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 7 | ||||||||
| 54 | 56 | 38 | 17 | 21 | |||||||||
page 59
| Cross border outstandings in excess of 0.75% of total assets Cross border outstandings consist of loans to banks and customers (including finance lease and instalment credit receivables) and other monetary assets, including non-local currency claims of overseas offices on local residents. The Group monitors the geographical breakdown of outstandings based on the country of domicile of the borrower or guarantor of ultimate risk. The table below sets out the Group’s cross border outstandings in excess of 0.75% of Group total assets (including acceptances) of £414.4 billion (2001 – £371.7 billion; 2000 –£320.9 billion). None of these countries has experienced repayment difficulties that have required refinancing of outstanding debt. |
| 31 December | As
% of total assets % |
Total £m |
Banks and other financial institutions £m |
Governments and official institutions £m |
Commercial, industrial and other private sector £m |
||||||||
| 2002 | |||||||||||||
| United States | 2.81 | 11,658 | 4,960 | 453 | 6,245 | ||||||||
| Germany | 2.53 | 10,464 | 8,657 | 795 | 1,012 | ||||||||
| Cayman Islands | 1.66 | 6,897 | 226 | - | 6,671 | ||||||||
| Netherlands | 1.52 | 6,318 | 4,446 | 247 | 1,625 | ||||||||
| France | 1.44 | 5,971 | 4,835 | 146 | 990 | ||||||||
| Italy | 0.93 | 3,867 | 2,286 | 326 | 1,255 | ||||||||
| Japan | 0.76 | 3,156 | 2,855 | 1 | 300 | ||||||||
| 2001 | |||||||||||||
| United States | 2.40 | 8,901 | 2,473 | 2,009 | 4,419 | ||||||||
| Germany | 2.14 | 7,969 | 6,488 | 483 | 998 | ||||||||
| Cayman Islands | 1.48 | 5,501 | 1,581 | - | 3,920 | ||||||||
| France | 1.33 | 4,930 | 3,090 | 230 | 1,610 | ||||||||
| Netherlands | 1.24 | 4,596 | 3,400 | - | 1,196 | ||||||||
| Switzerland | 0.98 | 3,646 | 3,269 | 3 | 374 | ||||||||
| 2000 | |||||||||||||
| United States | 2.03 | 6,520 | 4,006 | 13 | 2,501 | ||||||||
| Germany | 1.92 | 6,156 | 5,654 | 91 | 411 | ||||||||
| Japan | 1.21 | 3,891 | 3,327 | 133 | 431 | ||||||||
| Netherlands | 1.07 | 3,446 | 2,104 | 6 | 1,336 | ||||||||
| France | 1.03 | 3,310 | 2,375 | 62 | 873 | ||||||||
| Switzerland | 0.98 | 3,137 | 2,718 | 6 | 413 | ||||||||
| Cayman Islands | 0.90 | 2,878 | 40 | - | 2,838 | ||||||||
| Selected country exposures The Group devotes particular attention to exposures to countries that have been adversely affected by global economic pressure. The table below details exposures to countries that are sometimes considered as having a higher credit and foreign exchange risk. |
| Bank £m |
Non-bank £m |
31
December 2002 Total £m |
Bank £m |
Non-bank £m |
31
December 2001 Total £m |
Bank £m |
Non-bank £m |
31
December 2000 Total £m |
|||||||||||||
| Argentina | 30 | 15 | 45 | 39 | 12 | 51 | 113 | 63 | 176 | ||||||||||||
| Brazil | - | 14 | 14 | 158 | 22 | 180 | 193 | 38 | 231 | ||||||||||||
| Mexico | 66 | 91 | 157 | 108 | 62 | 170 | 155 | 87 | 242 | ||||||||||||
| Turkey | 25 | 65 | 90 | 38 | 102 | 140 | 153 | 35 | 188 | ||||||||||||
| Venezuela | - | 115 | 115 | - | 99 | 99 | - | 91 | 91 | ||||||||||||
| page 60 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Off balance sheet arrangements The Group is involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose vehicles, lending commitments and financial guarantees. |
| Special purpose vehicles (“SPVs”) are vehicles set up for a specific, limited purpose that do not carry out a business or trade and typically have no employees. They take a variety of legal forms – trusts, partnerships and companies – and fulfil many different functions. They constitute a key element of securitisation transactions in which an SPV acquires financial assets funded by the issue of securities. |
| In the normal course of business, the Group arranges securitisations to facilitate client transactions and undertakes securitisations to sell financial assets or to obtain funding. It has established a number of SPVs to act as commercial paper conduits for customers. SPVs are also utilised in its fund management activities to structure investment funds to which the Group provides investment management services. |
| Lending commitments and other commitments Under a loan commitment, the Group agrees to make funds available to a customer in the future. Loan commitments, which are usually for a specified term, may be unconditionally cancellable or may persist, provided all conditions in the loan facility are satisfied or waived. Commitments to lend include commercial standby facilities and credit lines, liquidity facilities to commercial paper conduits and unutilised overdraft facilities. Other commitments include documentary credits, which are commercial letters of credit providing for payment by the Group to a named beneficiary against presentation of specified documents, forward asset purchases, forward deposits placed and undrawn note issuance and revolving underwriting facilities. |
| Guarantees and other contingent liabilities The Group gives guarantees on behalf of customers. A financial guarantee represents an irrevocable undertaking that the Group will meet a customer’s obligations to third parties if the customer fails to do so. The maximum amount that the Group could be required to pay under a guarantee is its principal amount. The Group expects most guarantees it provides to expire unused. Other contingent liabilities include contingent liabilities arising out of acceptances, endorsements, standby letters of credit, performance and customs bonds, warranties and indemnities. In accepting a bill of exchange drawn on it by a customer a bank undertakes to pay the holder of the bill at maturity. Most acceptances are presented for payment and reimbursement by the customer is usually immediate. In the UK, bills accepted by certain banks designated by the Bank of England are eligible for rediscount at the Bank of England. Under US GAAP, acceptances and the corresponding customer obligation are recognised on the balance sheet. In endorsing a bill of exchange, a bank accepts liability for payment of any shortfall on the bill at maturity. Unlike acceptances, the endorsing bank receives value for the bill, which is then rediscounted. |
| The Group’s contingent liabilities and commitments are set out in Note 41 on the accounts. |
page 61
| Contractual obligations The table below summarises the Group’s contractual cash obligations by remaining maturity as at 31 December 2002. |
Less than 1 year £m |
More
than 1 year but less than 3 years £m |
More
than 3 years but less than 5 years £m |
Over 5 years £m |
Total £m |
||
| Contractual cash obligations | ||||||
| Dated loan capital | 355 |
1,183 |
454 |
5,610 |
7,602 |
|
| Operating leases | 247 |
454 |
408 |
2,247 |
3,356 |
|
| Finance leases | 29 |
10 |
4 |
128 |
171 |
|
| Unconditional obligations to purchase goods or services | 489 |
420 |
3 |
1 |
913 |
|
| Total | 1,120 |
2,067 |
869 |
7,986 |
12,042 |
|
| The table above does not include undated loan capital. The maturity of deposits by banks is given in Note 24, of customer accounts in Note 25, and of debt securities in issue in Note 26. |
| Liquidity
risk Liquidity management within the Group focuses on both overall balance sheet structure and the control within prudent limits of risk arising from the mismatch of maturities across the balance sheet and from contingent obligations. |
| The structure of the Group’s balance sheet is managed to maintain substantial diversification, to minimise concentration across its various deposit sources, and to contain the level of reliance on total and net short-term wholesale sources of funds within prudent levels. |
| The short-term maturity structure of the Group’s liabilities and assets is also managed on a daily basis to ensure that contractual cashflow obligations, and potential cashflows arising from undrawn commitments and other contingent obligations, can be met as they arise from day to day, either from cash inflows from maturing assets, new borrowing or from the sale or repurchase of various debt securities held. |
| That short-term liquidity risk is managed on a consolidated basis for the whole Group excluding the activities of Citizens and insurance businesses in the UK, which are subject to regulatory regimes that necessitate the separate management of liquidity. Internal liquidity mismatch limits are set for all other subsidiaries and non-UK branches which have material local treasury activities in external markets, to ensure those activities do not compromise daily maintenance of the Group’s overall liquidity risk position within the Group’s policy parameters. |
| The level of large deposits taken from banks, corporate customers, non-bank financial institutions and other customers, and significant cash outflows therefrom, are also reviewed to monitor concentration and identify any adverse trends. |
| The degree of maturity mismatch within the overall long-term structure of the Group’s assets and liabilities is also managed within internal policy limits, to ensure that term asset commitments may be funded on an economic basis over their life. In managing its overall term structure, the Group analyses and takes into account the effect of retail and corporate customer behaviour on actual asset and liability maturities where they differ materially from the underlying contractual maturities. |
| Policy parameters for the control of overall balance sheet structure and liquidity risk are set by the GALCO. Compliance is monitored and co-ordinated by the Group Treasury function both in respect of internal policy and the regulatory requirements of the FSA. |
| In addition to their consolidation within the Group’s daily liquidity management processes, it is also the responsibility of all Group subsidiaries and branches outside the UK to ensure compliance with all separate local regulatory liquidity requirements applicable. |
| The Group also periodically evaluates various scenarios and undertakes stress tests to analyse the potential impact on its liquidity risk. Contingency plans are maintained to anticipate and respond to any approaching or actual material deterioration in market conditions. |
| page 62 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Sources of funding Excluding capital and other liabilities, customer accounts continue to provide a substantial majority of the Group’s funding and represent a well diversified and stable source of funds from a wide range of retail, corporate and non-bank institutional customers. |
| 2002 |
2001 |
|||||
£m |
% |
£m |
% |
|||
| |
||||||
| Customer
accounts: repayable on demand |
127,320 |
39 |
115,054 |
41 |
||
| time deposits (excluding repos) | 66,781 |
21 |
66,486 |
23 |
||
| |
||||||
| Total customer accounts | 194,101 |
60 |
181,540 |
64 |
||
| Repo agreements with customers | 25,060 |
8 |
17,455 |
6 |
||
| Deposits by banks (including repos) | 54,720 |
17 |
40,038 |
14 |
||
| Debt securities in issue | 33,938 |
10 |
30,669 |
11 |
||
| Short positions | 16,381 |
5 |
14,622 |
5 |
||
|
|
||||||
| Total
deposits including repo agreements, debt securities in issue and short positions |
324,200 |
100 |
284,324 |
100 |
||
| Customer accounts, excluding repo agreements, grew by £12,561 million, 7% and represent 60% of the Group’s funding excluding capital and other liabilities. In reflection of the higher rate of growth in customer loans and advances excluding reverse repos, up £22,754 million, 12%, the proportion of funding from wholesale sources has increased. |
| Repo agreements with corporate and institutional customers are undertaken primarily by RBS Greenwich Capital in the USA and by Financial Markets. Repo activity with customers increased to represent 8% of the Group’s funding excluding capital and other liabilities at 31 December 2002 (2001 – 6%). |
| Deposits by banks increased by £14,682 million to represent 17% of the Group’s funding, excluding capital and other liabilities. Deposits by banks are taken from a wide range of counterparties, with the largest single depositor continuing to represent less than 1% of the Group’s total funding. |
| Debt securities in issue increased by £3,269 million to represent 10% of the Group’s funding, excluding capital and other liabilities, at 31 December 2002 (2001 – 11%). Total debt securities in issue at 31 December 2002 includes £6,035 million (2001 – £5,969 million) with a maturity of over 1 year, reflecting the activity of the Group in raising term funds through its Euro Medium Term Note programme and other term issues. |
| The Group remains well placed to access various wholesale funding sources from a wide range of counterparties and markets, and the changing mix evident between customer repo, deposits by banks and debt securities in issue primarily reflects comparative pricing and investor/counterparty demand rather than a material perceived trend. |
page 63
| Net customer activity Net customer lending rose by £10,193 million as the growth in loans and advances to customers exceeded the growth in customer accounts, thus increasing the degree of reliance on wholesale market funding to support loan growth. Structural liquidity risk continues to be maintained well within the Group’s policy parameters. |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||
| Loans and advances to customers (excluding reverse repos) | 205,303 |
182,549 |
|||
| Customer accounts (excluding repos) | 194,101 |
181,540 |
|||
| Customer lending less customers accounts | 11,202 |
1,009 |
|||
| Customer accounts (excluding repos) as % of loans and advances to customers (excluding reverse repos) |
94.5 |
% | 99.4 |
% | |
| In prevailing economic conditions and with interest rates at historically low levels in the UK, US and Europe, it is anticipated that the growth in demand for further borrowing by customers will in the medium term continue to exceed that for customer deposits received, thus increasing net customer lending further and increasing gradually over time the Group’s dependence on the wholesale market for funding. The Group has evaluated a range of balance sheet management strategies to address the consequent impact on its liquidity risk position and has developed plans to contain that within its normal policy parameters. |
| Net wholesale market activity | |||||
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||
| Deposits by banks (including repos) : | |||||
| repayable on demand | 15,559 |
7,259 |
|||
| less than 3 months maturity | 35,125 |
25,560 |
|||
| over 3 months maturity | 4,036 |
7,219 |
|||
54,720 |
40,038 |
||||
| Repos with customers | 25,060 |
17,455 |
|||
| Debt securities in issue | 33,938 |
30,669 |
|||
| Short positions | 16,381 |
14,622 |
|||
| Wholesale liabilities | 130,099 |
102,784 |
|||
| Loans and advances to banks (including reverse repos): | |||||
| repayable on demand | 6,792 |
3,934 |
|||
| less than 3 months maturity | 28,537 |
26,200 |
|||
| over 3 months maturity | 8,974 |
8,387 |
|||
44,303 |
38,521 |
||||
| Reverse repo agreements with customers | 21,941 |
11,588 |
|||
| Debt securities, treasury bills and other eligible bills | 78,501 |
74,176 |
|||
|
|
|||||
| Wholesale assets | 144,745 |
124,285 |
|||
| Net surplus of wholesale assets | 14,646 |
21,501 |
|||
| The Group’s net surplus of wholesale assets reduced by £6,855 million, but overall structural liquidity risk remains well within the Group’s policy parameters. |
| Comparing the maturity and level of deposits by banks with loans and advances to banks shows an increased reliance on shorter term interbank funding. Deposits by banks net of loans and advances to banks increased from £1,517 million to £10,417 million and the maturity structure has shortened. Net bank deposits repayable on demand rose by £5,442 million and net bank deposits of less than 3 months’maturity rose by £7,228 million, whilst net bank lending of over 3 months maturity rose by £3,770 million. |
| page 64 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Analysis of deposits – product analysis The following table shows the distribution of the Group’s deposits by type and geographical area: |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||||||
| UK | ||||||||
| Domestic: | ||||||||
| Demand deposits - interest-free | 22,067 |
21,095 |
20,721 |
|||||
| - interest-bearing | 66,118 |
63,609 |
53,903 |
|||||
| Time deposits - savings | 12,180 |
13,226 |
13,778 |
|||||
| - other | 59,819 |
40,360 |
37,388 |
|||||
| Overseas residents: | ||||||||
| Demand deposits - interest-free | 908 |
1,301 |
2,192 |
|||||
| - interest-bearing | 8,897 |
7,286 |
8,824 |
|||||
| Time deposits - savings | 1,559 |
3,210 |
6,167 |
|||||
| - other | 21,824 |
21,979 |
13,450 |
|||||
| Total UK offices | 193,372 |
172,066 |
156,423 |
|||||
| Overseas | ||||||||
| Demand deposits - interest-free | 6,698 |
6,719 |
4,206 |
|||||
| - interest-bearing | 10,148 |
10,787 |
8,127 |
|||||
| Time deposits - savings | 15,189 |
21,343 |
15,293 |
|||||
| - other | 48,474 |
28,118 |
28,383 |
|||||
| Total overseas offices (see below) | 80,509 |
66,967 |
56,009 |
|||||
| Total deposits | 273,881 |
239,033 |
212,432 |
|||||
| Banking business | 230,144 |
211,942 |
187,344 |
|||||
| Trading business | 43,737 |
27,091 |
25,088 |
|||||
| Total deposits | 273,881 |
239,033 |
212,432 |
|||||
| Overseas | ||||||||
| US | 61,738 |
49,815 |
39,567 |
|||||
| Rest of the World | 18,771 |
17,152 |
16,442 |
|||||
| Total overseas | 80,509 |
66,967 |
56,009 |
|||||
| Short-term borrowings The following table shows details of the Groups short-term borrowings: | ||||||||
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||||||
| Commercial paper: | ||||||||
| Outstanding at year end | 3,515 |
273 |
681 |
|||||
| Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during year | 3,515 |
643 |
1,073 |
|||||
| Approximate average amount outstanding during year | 868 |
572 |
737 |
|||||
| Approximate weighted average interest rate during the year | 2.0 |
% | 4.3 |
% |
6.2 |
% | ||
| Approximate weighted average interest rate at year end | 1.6 |
% | 4.1 |
% |
4.7 |
% | ||
| Other short-term borrowings: | ||||||||
| Outstanding at year end | 72,069 |
47,750 |
38,926 |
|||||
| Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during year | 72,264 |
56,890 |
45,993 |
|||||
| Approximate average amount outstanding during year | 58,246 |
50,628 |
32,437 |
|||||
| Approximate weighted average interest rate during year | 2.9 |
% | 4.8 |
% |
5.6 |
% | ||
| Approximate weighted average interest rate at year end | 2.2 |
% | 3.8 |
% |
5.8 |
% | ||
| Average interest rates during the year are computed by dividing total interest expense by the average amount borrowed. Average interest rates at year end are average rates for a single day and as such may reflect one-day market distortions which may not be indicative of generally prevailing rates. Original maturities of commercial paper are not in excess of one year. ‘Other short-term borrowings’consist principally of borrowings in the money markets included within ‘Deposits by banks’and ‘Customer accounts’ in the accounts, and generally have original maturities of one year or less. |
page 65
| Certificates of deposit and other time deposits The following table shows details of the Group’s certificates of deposit and other time deposits over $100,000 or equivalent by remaining maturity. |
Within 3 months £m |
Over
3 months but within 6 months £m |
Over
6 months but within 12 months £m |
Over 12 months £m |
2002 Total £m |
||
| UK based companies and branches | ||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 17,130 |
416 |
306 |
810 |
18,662 |
|
| Other time deposits | 58,045 |
3,097 |
2,038 |
2,600 |
65,780 |
|
| Overseas based companies and branches | ||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 6,144 |
495 |
803 |
- |
7,442 |
|
| Other time deposits | 33,873 |
493 |
410 |
1,674 |
36,450 |
|
| Total | 115,192 |
4,501 |
3,557 |
5,084 |
128,334 |
|
| Sterling liquidity Over 53% of the Group’s total assets are denominated in sterling. The FSA requires the Group on a consolidated basis to maintain daily a minimum ratio of 100% between: |
| • | a stock of qualifying high quality liquid assets (primarily UK government securities, treasury bills, eligible bank bills, and cash held in branches) and |
| • | the sum of : |
| • | sterling wholesale net outflows contractually due within 5 working days (offset up to a limit of 50%, by 85% of sterling certificates of deposit held which mature beyond 5 working days), and |
| • | 5% of retail deposits with a residual contractual maturity of 5 working days or less. |
The Group has exceeded the minimum ratio requirement throughout 2002. The FSA also set an absolute minimum level for the stock of qualifying liquid assets that the Group is required to maintain each day. The Group has exceeded that minimum stock requirement at all times during 2002. The Group’s operational processes are actively managed to ensure that both the minimum sterling liquidity ratio and the minimum stock requirement are achieved or exceeded at all times. |
| Liquidity in non-sterling currencies For non-sterling currencies, no specific regulatory liquidity requirement is set for the Group by the FSA. However, the importance of managing prudently the liquidity risk in its non-sterling activities is recognised and the Group manages its non-sterling liquidity risk daily within net mismatch limits set for the 0-8 calendar day and 0-1 month periods as a percentage of the Group’s total deposit liabilities. |
| In measuring its non-sterling liquidity risk, due account is taken of the marketability within a short period of the wide range of debt securities held. Appropriate adjustments are applied in each case, dependent on various parameters, to determine the Group’s ability to realise cash at short notice via the sale or repo of such marketable assets if required to meet unexpected outflows. |
| The level of contingent risk from the potential drawing of undrawn or partially drawn commitments, back-up lines, standby lines and other similar facilities is also actively monitored and reflected in the measures of the Group’s non-sterling liquidity risk. Particular attention is given to the US$ commercial paper market and the propensity of the Group’s corporate counterparties who are active in raising funds from that market to switch to take up facilities offered by the Group in the event of either counterparty specific difficulties or a significant widening of interest spreads generally in the commercial paper market. |
| The Group also provides liquidity back-up facilities to both its own conduits and certain other conduits which take funding from the US$ commercial paper market. Limits sanctioned for such facilities totalled less than £6,000 million at 31 December 2002. The short-term contingent liquidity risk in providing such back-up facilities is also mitigated by the spread of maturity dates typically over a 3-month period of the commercial paper taken by the conduits. |
| The Group has operated within its non-sterling liquidity policy mismatch limits at all times during 2002 and operational processes are actively managed to ensure that is the case going forward. |
| Contingency plans are also maintained to enable the Group to respond effectively to unforeseen market liquidity or major payment systems problems that may emerge from time to time. |
| page 66 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Analysis of deposits – currency analysis The following table shows the distribution of deposits by banks and customer accounts by sterling and other currencies. |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Deposits by banks | ||||
| Sterling | 10,998 |
9,027 |
3,330 |
|
| Other currencies | 43,722 |
31,011 |
31,800 |
|
| Total deposits by banks | 54,720 |
40,038 |
35,130 |
|
| Customer accounts | ||||
| Sterling | 133,404 |
125,425 |
122,420 |
|
| Other currencies | 85,757 |
73,570 |
54,882 |
|
| Total customer accounts | 219,161 |
198,995 |
177,302 |
|
| Total deposits | 273,881 |
239,033 |
212,432 |
|
| Market
risk The Group is exposed to market risk because of positions held in its treasury and trading portfolios, as well as its non-trading activity. |
| Market risk in the treasury portfolios arises as a consequence of the management of the Group’s liquidity requirements. The instruments that give rise to this type of risk are mainly money-market instruments and interest rate derivatives and the main risk factor is therefore interest rates. |
| Market risk in the trading portfolios is mainly associated with customer-facing trading businesses through the market-making operations and through taking positions in tradeable securities. The associated instruments are held on the trading (mark-to-market) books, and the main risk factors are interest rates, credit spreads, and foreign exchange. |
| Non-trading market risk is associated with the mismatches between the re-pricing of the Group’s non-trading financial assets and liabilities; with the Group’s investment in overseas subsidiaries, associates and branches; with the Group’s venture capital portfolio; with the investments held in Direct Line Group; and with the strategic equity investment in SCH. |
| Option risk in the non-trading businesses principally occurs in certain fixed rate assets and liabilities. |
| Mismatch risk mainly gives rise to interest-rate exposure that is then transferred to the Group’s trading or treasury units for management within their approved limits. The exception is Citizens, where the risk is retained in the non-trading retail and commercial banks. |
| The Group does not maintain material non-trading open currency positions other than the structural foreign currency translation exposures arising from its investments in overseas subsidiary and associated undertakings and their related currency funding. |
| Non-trading equity risk arises principally from the Group’s strategic investments, its venture capital activities and its general insurance business. |
| The Group’s long-term assurance assets and liabilities attributable to policyholders have been excluded from these market risk disclosures. |
| The Group manages the market risk in its trading and treasury portfolios through its Market Risk Management framework, which is based on value-at-risk (“VaR”) limits, together with, but not limited to, stress testing, scenario analysis, and position and sensitivity limits. Stress testing measures the impact of abnormal changes in market rates and prices on the fair value of the Group’s trading portfolios. GEMC approves the high-level VaR and stress limits for the Group. The Group Market Risk function, independent from the Group’s trading businesses, is responsible for setting and monitoring the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s market risk management processes. |
page 67
| Value-at-risk VaR is a technique that produces estimates of the potential negative change in the market value of a portfolio over a specified time horizon at given confidence levels. For internal risk management purposes, the Group’s VaR assumes a time horizon of one day and a confidence level of 95%. In other words, a one-day loss greater than VaR is likely to occur on average on only one in every 20 business days. The Group uses historical simulation models in computing VaR. This approach, in common with many other VaR models, assumes that risk factor changes observed in the past are a good estimate of those likely to occur in the future and is, therefore, limited by the relevance of the historical data used. The Group’s method, however, does not make any assumption about the nature or type of underlying loss distribution. The Group typically uses the previous two years of market data. The Group’s VaR should be interpreted in light of the limitations of the methodology used. These limitations include: |
| • | Historical data may not provide the best estimate of the joint distribution of risk factor changes in the future and may fail to capture the risk of possible extreme adverse market movements which have not occurred in the historical window used in the calculations. |
| • | VaR using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day. |
| • | VaR using a 95% confidence level does not reflect the extent of potential losses beyond that percentile. |
| • | The Group largely computes the VaR of trading portfolios at the close of business and positions may change substantially during the course of the trading day. Controls are in place to limit the Group’s intra-day exposure; such as the calculation of the VaR for selected portfolios. |
| These limitations and the nature of the VaR measure mean that the Group cannot guarantee that losses will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated nor that losses in excess of the VaR amounts will not occur more frequently than once in 20 business days. For a discussion of the Group’s accounting policies for, and information with respect to, its exposures to derivative financial instruments, see accounting policy 15 and Note 39 on the accounts. |
| Trading The Group’s trading activities comprise: market making – quoting firm bid (buy) and offer (sell) prices with the intention of profiting from the spread between the quotes; customer facilitation – providing products to the Group’s client base at competitive prices; arbitrage – entering into offsetting positions in different but closely related markets in order to profit from market imperfections; and proprietary activity – taking positions in financial instruments as principal in order to take advantage of anticipated market conditions. |
| Financial instruments held in the Group’s trading portfolios include, but are not limited to, debt securities, loans, deposits, securities sale and repurchase agreements and derivative financial instruments (futures, forwards, swaps and options). |
| The VaR for the Group’s trading portfolios segregated by type of market risk exposure is presented in the tables below. |
| 2002 | Period
end £m |
Maximum £m |
Minimum £m |
Average(1) £m |
||
| Interest rate (2) | 8.4 |
11.6 |
6.0 |
9.0 |
||
| Currency | 1.2 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
1.2 |
||
| Equity | 0.6 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
||
| Diversification effects | (1.8 |
) |
||||
|
|
||||||
| Total | 8.4 |
11.8 |
5.6 |
9.1 |
||
| 2001 | Period
end £m |
Maximum £m |
Minimum £m |
Average(1) £m |
||
|
|
||||||
| Interest rate (2) | 7.9 |
15.4 |
7.7 |
11.1 |
||
| Currency | 0.4 |
2.6 |
0.3 |
1.1 |
||
| Equity | 0.4 |
1.6 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
||
| Diversification effects | (0.5 |
) |
||||
| Total | 8.2 |
15.6 |
7.7 |
11.3 |
||
(1) |
Notes: Calculated as the arithmetic average of daily VaR figures. |
| (2) | Includes credit spreads. |
| The largest part of the Group’s trading activities are carried out by Financial Markets. In the year to 31 December 2002, average daily profit including net interest for the trading portfolios in Financial Markets was £5.2 million (2001 – £5.2 million) and the standard deviation of profits was £4.1 million (2001 – £4.5 million). |
| page 68 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Non-trading The Group’s portfolios of non-trading financial instruments, arising from its treasury activities, its retail and corporate banking operations and its general insurance business, mainly comprise loans (including finance leases), debt securities, equity shares, deposits, certificates of deposit and other debt securities issued, loan capital and derivatives (mainly interest rate swaps). The VaR for these portfolios is presented below. |
2002
Period end £m |
2002 Maximum £m |
2002 Minimum £m |
2002 Average £m |
2001 Period end £m |
||||
| Interest rate | 34.7 |
34.7 |
9.7 |
14.5 |
7.7 |
|||
| Currency (1) | 0.2 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|||
| Equity | 8.6 |
8.6 |
6.8 |
7.4 |
7.8 |
|||
| Diversification effects | (11.0 |
) |
(6.7 |
) | ||||
| Total | 32.5 |
32.5 |
10.8 |
14.8 |
8.9 |
|||
| (1) | Excludes the Group’s structural foreign currency exposures (see page 69). |
| Treasury The Group’s treasury activities include its money-market business and the management of internal funds flows with the Group’s businesses. Money-market portfolios include cash instruments (principally debt securities, loans and deposits) and related hedging derivatives. VaR for the Group’s treasury portfolios, which relates mainly to interest rate risk, is presented below. |
Period
end £m |
Maximum £m |
Minimum £m |
Average
£m |
|||
| 2002 | 6.5 |
6.7 |
3.5 |
4.4 |
||
| 2001 | 4.6 |
5.9 |
3.8 |
4.5 |
||
| Retail and corporate banking Structural interest rate risk arises in the Group’s commercial banking activities where assets and liabilities have different repricing dates. Group policy seeks to minimise the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in interest rates. The policy requires that all material interest rate risk arising from retail and corporate banking activities be transferred to a trading or treasury unit for management within its approved limits. The exception to this approach is Citizens which is covered by the policy but its stance on risk minimisation differs to other parts of the Group in that it seeks to maximise yield on its investment portfolio whilst staying within interest rate risk limits set by GALCO and local banking regulators. |
| Structural interest rate risk is calculated in each business unit on the basis of establishing the repricing behaviour of each asset and liability product. For many products, the actual interest rate repricing characteristics differ from the contractual repricing. |
| In most cases, the repricing maturity is then determined by the market interest rate that most closely fits the historical behaviour of the product interest rate. For non-interest bearing current accounts, the repricing maturity is determined by the stability of the portfolio. The repricing maturities used are approved by Group Treasury and business unit asset and liability committees annually, or more often if appropriate. The key conventions are reviewed annually by GALCO. |
| A static maturity gap report is produced as at the month-end for each material business unit, in each functional currency based on the behaviouralised repricing for each product. It is Group policy to include non-financial assets and liabilities, mainly tangible fixed assets and the Group’s capital and reserves, spread over medium and longer term maturities, in the gap report. This report also includes hedge transactions, principally derivatives. |
| Residual non-trading interest rate exposures are controlled by limiting repricing mismatches in the individual balance sheets. Potential exposures to interest rate movements in the medium to long term are measured and controlled using a version of the same VaR methodology, but without discount factors, that is used for the Group’s trading portfolios. Short-term exposures are measured and controlled in terms of net interest income sensitivity over 12 months to a 1% parallel movement in interest rates. These exposures are monitored against limits approved by GALCO and reported to GALCO monthly. |
| A VaR calculation aggregating all non-trading assets and liabilities in the Group’s balance sheet is undertaken quarterly. At 31 December 2002, the total VaR exposure relating to structural interest rate risk was estimated to be £31.2 million (2001 – £8.8 million) with the major exposure being to changes in US dollar interest rates. During the year, the maximum VaR was £31.2 million (2001 – £13.7 million), the minimum £8.0 million (2001 – £4.4 million) and the average £13.4 million (2001 – £7.9 million). The major contributor to this non-tradingVaR is Citizens. |
| Option risk in the non-trading businesses principally occurs in certain fixed rate assets and liabilities. An example is where customers can repay fixed rate loans or withdraw fixed rate deposits before their maturity. Extensive modelling is undertaken to identify potential levels of early repayment in differing interest rate environments. The Group also seeks to protect itself from early repayment risk through the imposition of early repayment interest charges, where applicable. Option risk also arises where businesses undertake to provide funding to, or to accept deposits from, customers at a future date at a pre-determined fixed interest rate and where deposit pricing reaches effective floors. The VaR numbers stated above do not reflect any for embedded option risk. |
page 69
| The two main embedded option risks within the Group’s commercial banking activities are: |
| (i) | Citizens has a sizable investment portfolio consisting largely of mortgage-backed securities which are fixed rate instruments which can be subject to significant refinancing activity in a falling interest rate environment and extension risk in a rising interest rate environment. The embedded option risk is primarily managed by controlling Citizens’sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the economic value of equity (“EVE”) which represents the present value of the cashflows generated by the current balance sheet. The sensitivity of EVE to a two per cent parallel movement upwards and downwards in US interest rates is shown in the table below. |
Increase/(decrease)
in EVE |
|||||
| 2002 | 2%
parallel upward movement in US interest rates % |
2%
parallel downward movement in US interest rates (no negative rates allowed) % |
|||
|
|
|||||
| Period end | (5.7 |
) |
(7.4 |
) |
|
| Maximum | (8.7 |
) |
(9.5 |
) |
|
| Minimum | 8.7 |
(0.3 |
) |
||
| Average | (4.6 |
) |
(6.3 |
) |
|
| (ii) | In a low interest rate environment deposit pricing may reach effective floors below which it is not reasonable to reduce rates further whilst variable rate asset pricing continues to decline. A sustained low rate scenario would also generate reduced income from the medium and long term hedging of the Group’s net non-interest bearing liabilities. GALCO regularly reviews the impact of successive declines in rates to ensure that appropriate risk management strategies are employed. |
| Currency risk The Group does not maintain material non-trading open currency positions other than the structural foreign currency translation exposures arising from its investments in overseas subsidiary and associated undertakings and their related currency funding. The Group’s policy in relation to structural positions is to match fund the structural foreign currency exposure arising from net asset value, including goodwill, in overseas subsidiaries, equity accounted investments and branches, except where doing so would materially increase the sensitivity of either the Group’s or the subsidiary’s regulatory capital ratios to currency movements. The policy requires structural foreign exchange positions to be reviewed regularly by GALCO. Gains or losses on foreign currency investments net of any gains or losses on related foreign currency funding or hedges are recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. |
| The tables below set out the Group’s structural foreign currency exposures. |
At
31 December 2002 |
||||
| |
||||
| Functional currency of net investments | Net
investments in overseas operations £m |
Foreign
currency borrowings hedging net investments £m |
Structural
foreign currency exposures £m |
|
|
|
||||
| US dollar | 5,190 |
5,107 |
83 |
|
| Euro | 1,019 |
558 |
461 |
|
| Swiss franc | 306 |
295 |
11 |
|
| Other non-sterling | 35 |
30 |
5 |
|
|
|
||||
| Total | 6,550 |
5,990 |
560 |
|
| At 31 December 2001 | ||||
| Functional currency of net investments | Net
investments in overseas operations £m |
Foreign
currency borrowings hedging net investments £m |
Structural
foreign currency exposures £m |
|
|
|
||||
| US dollar | 5,207 |
5,162 |
45 |
|
| Euro | 797 |
242 |
555 |
|
| Swiss franc | 250 |
243 |
7 |
|
| Other non-sterling | 61 |
46 |
15 |
|
| Total | 6,315 |
5,693 |
622 |
|
| The structural foreign currency exposure in euros is principally due to Ulster Bank running an open structural foreign exchange position to minimise the sensitivity of its capital ratios to possible movements in the euro exchange rate against sterling. |
| Equity risk Non-trading equity risk arises principally from the Group’s strategic investments, its venture capital activities and its general insurance business. The reserves of the Group’s general insurance business are invested in cash, debt securities and equity shares. The VaR of the equity element of this portfolio was £8.6 million at 31 December 2002 (2001 – £7.8 million). VaR is not an appropriate risk measure for the Group’s venture capital investments, comprising a mix of quoted and unquoted investments, or its portfolio of strategic investments. At 31 December 2002, equity shares held as investment securities had a book value of £1,783 million (2001 – £1,528 million) and a valuation of £1,699 million (2001 – £1,792 million). |
| page 70 | Operating and financial review continued |
| Regulatory risk Regulatory risk is defined as the risk of material loss, reputational damage or liability arising from failure to comply with the requirement of the Group’s lead regulator, the FSA and other regulators or related codes of best practice that oversee regulated businesses in any locations in which the Group operates. |
| The Group’s current businesses operate under the supervision of over 100 regulators in over 20 countries. Other overseas regulators who supervise major parts of the Group include: |
| Overseas regulator | RBS division | Territory | |
| Securities and Exchange Commission | CBFM/Citizens/Wealth Management | US | |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Boston | CBFM/Citizens | US | |
| National Association of Securities Dealers | CBFM/Wealth Management | US | |
| Central Bank of Ireland | CBFM/Ulster Bank/Wealth Management | Republic of Ireland | |
| Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | CBFM/Direct Line Group/Retail Direct | Germany | |
| Financial Services Authority | CBFM/Direct Line Group | Japan | |
| Cayman Islands Monetary Authority | CBFM/Wealth Management | Cayman Islands | |
| Financial Services Commission | Ulster Bank/Wealth Management | Isle of Man | |
| Hong Kong Monetary Authority | CBFM/Wealth Management | Hong Kong | |
| The Group analyses regulatory risk into: |
| Upstream risk: the risk to which the Group may be exposed by its failure to identify and engage with regulators on developments which are in course of consideration or preparation by Government, regulators and other bodies, including the European Union. This has become an increasingly important area given the rapid and growing rate at which such developments have been tabled by regulators and other relevant bodies round the world. |
| Downstream risk: the risk to the Group from failing to comply with extant rules (analogous to traditional “compliance” risk). This is an increasing challenge given the growing intricacy of the rules in place and the scale and complexity of the Group’s businesses. |
| Regulator risk: the risk to the Group of a failure to manage effectively its relationships with its regulators. Given that the Group includes businesses operating under the supervision of many regulatory bodies in many jurisdictions, the management of this risk is a complex and continuous process. |
| During the year, a Group Regulatory Risk Team was created within Group Risk Management, as a successor to the previous Group Compliance function. Its objective has been to enhance management of regulatory risk by incorporating the identification and management process into the Group’s wider risk management structure and methodologies. |
| Enterprise
risk Enterprise risk management is the term used within the Group to describe the risk of an actual or potential loss to the Group that is not managed directly by existing liquidity, regulatory, market or credit risk management processes. Such risks can arise internally from inadequate or failed internal processes and systems, staff error and management failure or externally from changes to the legal, physical, political or business environment within any of the territories where the Group conducts business. Enterprise risk management also includes the potential or actual impact on our corporate reputation arising from any of the Group’s activities. |
page 71
| Operational risk management Operational risk is defined as the risk arising from within the organisation. It has four major components: |
| • | People – risks arising from an inappropriate level of staff, inadequately skilled or managed. |
| • | Process – risk caused by inadequate or failed internal processes. |
| • | Systems – risks of inadequately designed or maintained systems. |
| • | Assets – risk of damage, misappropriation or theft of the Group’s physical, logical and intangible assets. |
| Within each Division there are independent operational risk management units, reporting to both divisional executive management, who have the final responsibility for managing divisional operational risk, and Group Risk. |
| External risk management External risk is defined as the risk arising from outside of the organisation in three main areas; |
| • | Business – risks arising from competitor activity, supplier unreliability or customer activity. |
| • | Political – risks caused by non-compliance with, or changes to, current legislation, political unrest or uncertainty, lobbying activity or targeted sabotage. |
| • | Environment – risk caused by demographic, macro economic or environmental change. |
| External risk management is primarily performed at a Group level and requires close co-operation across Group functions. As these risks can arise from changes to the legal, physical, political or business environment in any of the territories where the Group conducts business, close liaison with the relevant divisional risk management teams is also critical to the assessment and management of the Group’s risk exposure in these areas. |
| A key component of the risk management processes is the fight against financial crime. This includes the anti-money laundering processes in place across the Group. There are divisional and business unit anti-money laundering teams acting under the licence of, and monitored by, a Group anti-money laundering function. This monitoring ranges from monthly reporting of key indicators through to a full annual report by the money laundering Reporting Officer to the Board. |
| The monitoring and reporting covers the full spectrum of anti-money laundering responsibilities as follows: |
| • | Ensuring the required Know Your Customer procedures are in operation. |
| • | Transaction monitoring in order to identify suspicious or untoward incidents that may indicate money laundering activity. |
| • | Documentation requirements are met to support information requests from the regulators and law enforcement agencies. |
| • | Training and competence assessments of the Group’s staff. |
| The Group also manages insurance risk arising from insurance as a source of risk and as a tool to reduce other risk exposures. |
| Insurance is a source of risk where the Group sells and underwrites general insurance and life assurance. The essence of an insurance contract is the transfer of risk from the policyholder to the insurer. The Group controls its insurance exposures through product design and policy wordings, and through pricing and underwriting procedures. Investment strategy reflects the maturity of underwriting liabilities. Underwriting concentrations and catastrophe exposure are reviewed and, where necessary, mitigated by reinsurance. Group Risk Management provides the framework within which the consolidated insurance exposure is managed and provides guidance and challenge as appropriate. |
| The Group’s underwriting experience, the level of retained risk and solvency are monitored at business and Group level. |
| The Insurance Risk Department is responsible for the Group-wide purchase of insurance as a means of reducing other risk exposures. As such, it is a key component of the Group Insurance Risk Management process and reports its activities to the GEMC. |
| page 72 | Board of directors and secretary |
| Chairman Sir George Mathewson (3)(4) CBE, DUniv, LLD, FRSE, FCIBS (age 62), has a wide background in finance, technology and management and has spent some of his career in the United States. He was appointed a director in September 1987 and became Group Chief Executive in January 1992. In March 2000, he was appointed Executive Deputy Chairman and, in April 2001, he was appointed to his present position as Chairman. He is president of the British Bankers Association. He is a director of Santander Central Hispano, S.A., The Scottish Investment Trust PLC and The International Monetary Conference. He was chief executive of the Scottish Development Agency from 1981 to 1987. (Chairman of the Nominations Committee and the Chairman's Advisory Group) |
| Vice-chairmen Sir Iain Vallance (3)(4) FCIBS (age 59), is an experienced businessman. He has held a range of positions, including president, CBI, chairman, British Telecommunications p.l.c., chairman, European Advisory Committee to NYSE, deputy chairman, Financial Reporting Council and a member of the board of directors of the Mobil Corporation. He was appointed a director in January 1993 and became a vice-chairman in March 1994. He is currently chairman, European Services Forum and a member of the supervisory board of Siemens AG. |
| Sir
Angus Grossart
(3)(4) CBE, LLD, FRSE, DL, FCIBS (age 65), an advocate and chartered accountant, he has a background in merchant banking and is chairman of Noble Grossart Limited. He was appointed a director in September 1985 and became a vice-chairman in April 1996. He is also chairman of The Scottish Investment Trust PLC. He is a director of other public companies including Scottish and Newcastle PLC, Trinity Mirror PLC and Edinburgh US Tracker Trust plc. He is a Trustee of the National Heritage Memorial Fund and a former chairman of the Trustees of the National Galleries of Scotland. He has served on the boards of a wide range of public companies in the UK, the USA and Canada. |
| Executive
directors Fred Goodwin (4) DUniv, FCIBS, FCIB Group Chief Executive (age 44), a chartered accountant, was appointed as Deputy Group Chief Executive in August 1998 and to his present position in March 2000. He was formerly chief executive and director, Clydesdale Bank PLC and Yorkshire Bank PLC. He is chairman of The Prince's Trust: Scotland and a member of The Prince's Trust Council. He is a former president of the Chartered Institute of Bankers in Scotland. |
| Lawrence
Fish (age 58), was appointed a director in January 1993. He is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. He is also a director of Textron, Inc., a trustee of The Brookings Institution, a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, and a director of numerous community organisations in the USA. |
| Norman
McLuskie FCIBS (age 58), a chartered accountant, was appointed a director in June 1992 and is Chief Executive, Retail Direct. |
| Gordon
Pell FCIB, FCIBS (age 53), was appointed as a director and Chief Executive, Retail Banking on 6 March 2000. On 1 October 2001, he was appointed to his current position as Chairman, Retail Banking and Wealth Management. He was formerly group director, Lloyds TSB UK Retail Banking before joining National Westminster Bank Plc as a director in February 2000. |
| Iain
Robertson(4) CBE, FCIBS (age 57), a chartered accountant, was appointed a director in January 1993 and became Chief Executive, Corporate Banking and Financial Markets on 6 March 2000. He was appointed to his present position as Chairman, Corporate Banking and Financial Markets on 1 October 2001. He is also a chairman of British Empire Securities and General Trust plc. |
| Fred
Watt
(4) FCIBS (age 42), a chartered accountant, was appointed to his current position as Group Finance Director in September 2000. He was formerly finance director, Wassall plc. |
| (1) | member of the Remuneration Committee |
| (2) | member of the Audit Committee |
| (3) | member of the Nominations Committee |
| (4) | member of the Chairman's Advisory Group |
page 73
| Non-executive
directors Emilio Botin (age 68), of Spanish nationality, is chairman of Santander Central Hispano, S.A. He is also chairman of several Santander Central Hispano Group subsidiaries and a director of a number of Spanish companies including Bankinter SA. He is chairman of Universia.net, an internet venture between Santander Central Hispano and 650 universities in Spain, Portugal and the main countries in Latin America. |
| Colin
Buchan(2) (age 49), was appointed on 1 June 2002. He was educated in South Africa and spent the early part of his career in South Africa and the Far East. He retired as a member of the group management board of UBS AG and head of equities of UBS Warburg in March 2001. He has considerable international investment banking experience, as well as experience with very large risk management in the equities business. He was appointed a director of SG Warburg Group plc in 1995. His public directorships include Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust Plc. His other directorships include Merrill Lynch Gold Limited, Royal Scottish National Orchestra Society Limited, Standard Life Investments Limited, UBS Bunting Warburg Limited and World Mining Investment Company Limited. |
| Jim
Currie(1) (age 61), was appointed in November 2001. A highly experienced international civil servant, he spent many years working in Brussels and Washington. He was formerly Director General at the European Commission with responsibility for the EU's Environmental Policy and previously Director General for Customs and Indirect Taxation. He is also a director of British Nuclear Fuels Limited and International Adviser to Eversheds. |
| Juan
Inciarte (age 50), of Spanish nationality, is a general manager of Santander Central Hispano in charge of Europe and financial companies of the group. He is a former director of First Union Corporation, now Wachovia, and Interbank On-line System Limited. He is also a director of several Santander Central Hispano Group subsidiaries and a number of Spanish and European companies including CC-Bank AG and Sanpaolo IMI S.P.A. |
| Eileen
Mackay(1)(2) CB, FCIBS (age 59), is a former UK civil servant who held posts in Scotland, HM Treasury and the Cabinet Office and was principal finance officer at The Scottish Office. She is a director of Edinburgh Investment Trust plc and Scottish Financial Enterprise. She is chairman of Trustees of the David Hume Institute and is a member of the Economic and Social Research Council and the Review Board of the UK Accountancy profession and the Court of the University of Edinburgh |
| Sir
Steve Robson(2) (age 59), was appointed in July 2001. He was formerly a senior civil servant, with responsibility for a wide variety of Treasury interests. His early career included the post of Private Secretary to the Chancellor of the Exchequer and secondment to ICFC, (now 3i). He retired in January 2001 as Second Permanent Secretary of HM Treasury, where he was managing director of the Finance and Regulation Directorate. He is a non-executive director of Cazenove Group Plc, Xstrata Plc and Partnerships UK plc. |
| Bob
Scott(1)(3)(4) CBE (age 61), of Australian nationality, was appointed in January 2001. He has many years experience in the international insurance business and played a leading role in the consolidation of the UK insurance industry. He is a former group chief executive of CGNU plc and chairman of the Board of the Association of British Insurers. He is also a non-executive director of Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group plc, Swiss Reinsurance Company Zurich, Focus Wickes Group Limited, Yell Group Limited and a Trustee of the Crimestoppers Trust. (Chairman of the Remuneration Committee) |
| Peter
Sutherland (age 56), born in Ireland, was appointed in January 2001. He is a former attorney general of Ireland and was, from 1985 to 1989, European Commissioner responsible for competition policy. From 1989 to 1995, he was the chairman of Allied Irish Bank. From 1993 to 1995 he was director general of GATT and, subsequently, the World Trade Organisation. He is chairman of BP plc and chairman of Goldman Sachs International. He is also a director of Investor AB and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. |
| Bill
Wilson(1)(2)(3)(4) FCIBS (age 65), a chartered accountant, has a background in accounting and insurance and spent a number of years based in North America. He was formerly deputy chairman of Alexander & Alexander Services Inc., now part of the Aon Group. His other public directorships are Edinburgh US Tracker Trust plc, First Title plc, First American Title Insurance (U.K.) Co plc and Scottish Rugby Union Plc. (Chairman of the Audit Committee) |
| Secretary Miller McLean(4) FCIBS (age 53), was appointed Group Secretary in August 1994 and Group Director, Legal and Regulatory Affairs and Group Secretary in March 2000. He is vice-chairman of Banco Santander, Portugal S.A., a Trustee of the Industry and Parliament Trust, non-executive chairman of The Whitehall and Industry Group and a non-executive director of The Scottish Parliament and Business Exchange. |
| page 74 | Report of the directors |
| The directors have pleasure in presenting their report together with the audited accounts for the year ended 31 December 2002. |
| The Board remains firmly committed to the importance of good corporate governance and welcomed the opportunity during 2002 to participate in the Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive Directors undertaken by Derek Higgs. The Board is considering the recommendations contained in the Higgs Report which was issued in January 2003 to ensure that it continues to apply the highest standards of governance. |
| Profit and dividends The profit attributable to the ordinary shareholders of the company for the year ended 31 December 2002 amounted to £1,971 million (after preference dividends of £305 million and the Additional Value Shares dividend of £798 million) compared with £1,868 million for the year ended 31 December 2001, as set out in the consolidated profit and loss account on pages 96 and 97. |
| An interim dividend of 12.7p per ordinary share was paid on 11 October 2002 totalling £368 million (2001 – £313 million). The directors now recommend that a final dividend of 31.0p per ordinary share be paid on 6 June 2003 to members on the register at the close of business on 14 March 2003, totalling £899 million (2001 – £772 million). If this recommendation is approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting on 28 April 2003, the retained profit for the year will amount to £704 million (2001 – £783 million). Subject to the approval of shareholders at the annual general meeting, shareholders will be offered the choice of taking ordinary shares in lieu of cash in respect of the final dividend. |
| The second dividend of 30p per share on the Additional Value Shares issued in connection with the acquisition of NatWest was paid on 2 December 2002. |
| Activities and business review The company is a holding company owning the entire issued ordinary share capital of The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (“the Royal Bank”), the principal direct operating subsidiary undertaking of the company. The “Group” comprises the company, the Royal Bank and its subsidiary and associated undertakings, including National Westminster Bank Plc (“NatWest”) and its subsidiary and associated undertakings, Angel Trains Limited, RBSG Capital Corporation, RBS Life Holdings Limited and RBSG Collective Investments Holdings Limited. The Royal Bank and NatWest and their subsidiary undertakings are engaged principally in providing a comprehensive range of banking, insurance and other financial services. Details of the principal subsidiary undertakings of the company are shown in Note 18. A review of the business for the year to 31 December 2002, of recent events and of likely future developments is contained in the Operating and financial review. |
| Business developments In May 2002, Lombard North Central PLC completed the acquisition of Dixon Motors PLC. |
| In June 2002, the Royal Bank purchased the 86% interest in WorldPay Limited that it did not previously own. |
| In June 2002, ownership of RBSG Capital Corporation was transferred to the company from the Royal Bank. |
| In September 2002, Citizens announced the acquisition of Pennsylvania based commercial bank, Commonwealth Bancorp Inc. This acquisition was completed in January 2003. |
| In September 2002, Direct Line Group completed the acquisition of Royal & Sun Alliance’s direct motor insurance operation in Italy. |
| In October 2002, Citizens completed the acquisition of Medford Bancorp Inc., a Massachusetts savings bank. |
| In December 2002, the Royal Bank exercised its option to purchase Royal Bank of Scotland Portfolio Management and Royal Bank of Scotland Unit Trust Management from Newton Management Limited. In January 2003, 49% of the Royal Bank’s economic interest in Royal Bank of Scotland Unit Trust Management was sold to Aviva plc. |
| In January 2003, the entire issued share capital of NatWest was transferred to the RoyalBank from the company. Also in January 2003, the entire issued share capital of Lombard North Central PLC was transferred from NatWest to the Royal Bank. |
| Going concern The directors are satisfied that the Group has adequate resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the “going concern” basis for preparing the accounts. |
| Ordinary share capital During the year ended 31 December 2002, the ordinary share capital was increased by the following issues: |
| (a) | 5.1 million ordinary shares allotted as a result of the exercise of options under the company’s executive, sharesave and option 2000 schemes and a further 10.1 million ordinary shares allotted in respect of the exercise of options under the NatWest executive and sharesave schemes which had been exchanged for options over the company’s shares following the acquisition of NatWest; |
page 75
| (b) | 22.5 million ordinary shares allotted in lieu of cash dividends; and |
| (c) | 3.5 million ordinary shares allotted under the company’s profit sharing (share ownership) scheme. |
| The total consideration for ordinary shares issued during the year amounted to £697 million. |
| Details of the authorised and issued ordinary share capital at 31 December 2002 are shown in Note 33. |
| Preference share capital In January 2002, the company redeemed the 600 million non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.25 each at £1 per share, at a total cost of £600 million. |
| In January 2003, the company redeemed the 8 million Series B and the 16 million Series C, non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 each, at a total cost of US$600 million. |
| Details of the authorised and issued preference share capital at 31 December 2002 are shown in Note 33. |
| Trust preferred securities In June 2002, a subsidiary of the company issued 1.25 million Series A non-cumulative trust preferred securities at €1,000 per security, the net proceeds being €1,237 million. |
| In December 2002, a subsidiary of the company issued 750,000 Series B non-cumulative trust preferred securities at US$1,000 per security, the net proceeds being US$735 million. |
| Subordinated liabilities In March 2002, the Royal Bank issued £500 million 6.2% subordinated notes, the net proceeds being £497 million and US$350 million subordinated floating rate notes, the net proceeds being US$349 million. |
| In April 2002, the Royal Bank issued €130 million subordinated floating rate notes, the net proceeds being €130 million and US$500 million subordinated floating rate notes, the net proceeds being US$499 million. |
| In September 2002, the Royal Bank issued £300 million 5.625% subordinated notes, the net proceeds being £298 million; and NatWest redeemed US$250 million subordinated floating rate notes. |
| In October 2002, the company issued US$750 million 5% subordinated notes, the net proceeds being US$744 million. |
| In November 2002, the company issued US$250 million 5% subordinated notes, the net proceeds being US$244 million; and the Royal Bank issued €100 million subordinated floating rate notes, the net proceeds being €100 million. |
| Details of the subordinated liabilities are shown in Notes 30 and 31. |
| Shareholdings At 26 February 2003, the company has been notified of the following interests in its shares, in accordance with section 198 of the Companies Act 1985: |
| Number of shares | % held | Number of shares | % held | ||||
| Ordinary shares: | 5 ½% cumulative preference shares: | ||||||
| Santander Central Hispano S.A. | 146,187,191 | 5.04 | Commercial Union Assurance plc | 91,429 | 22.86 | ||
| Barclays PLC | 87,592,044 | 3.02 | Axa S.A. | 81,000 | 20.25 | ||
| 11% cumulative preference shares: | Bassett-Patrick Securities Limited* | 46,255 | 11.56 | ||||
| Guardian Royal Exchange | Mr P. S. and Mrs J. Allen | 35,999 | 9.00 | ||||
| Assurance plc | 129,830 | 25.97 | E M Behrens Charitable Trust | 20,000 | 5.00 | ||
| Windsor Life Assurance | Mrs Gina Wild | 19,800 | 4.95 | ||||
| Company Limited | 51,510 | 10.30 | Trustees of The Stephen Cockburn | 16,730 | 4.18 | ||
| The Investment Company plc | 39,165 | 7.83 | Limited Pension Scheme | 16,730 | 4.18 | ||
| Mr S. J. and Mrs J. A. Cockburn | 30,810 | 6.16 | Miss Elizabeth Hill | 16,124 | 4.03 | ||
| Cleaning Tokens Limited | 25,500 | 5.10 | Mr W. T. Hardison Jr. | 13,532 | 3.38 | ||
| * | Notification has been received on behalf of Mr A. W. R. Medlock and Mrs H. M. Medlock that they each have an interest in the holding of 5 ½% cumulative preference shares registered in the name of Bassett-Patrick Securities Limited noted above and that there are further holdings of 5,300 and 5,000 shares, respectively, of that class registered in each of their names. |
| page 76 | Report of the directors continued |
| Directors The names and brief biographical details of the directors are shown on pages 72 and 73. Mr Cameron McLatchie and Mr Murray Stuart retired from the Board on 26 April 2002. Mr Colin Buchan was appointed to the Board as a non-executive director on 1 June 2002. Mr Buchan was appointed since the last general meeting and will seek re-election at the forthcoming annual general meeting on 28 April 2003. All directors served throughout the year and to the date of signing of the financial statements, apart from those noted above. The directors retiring by rotation are Mr Botin, Miss Mackay, Mr Scott, Mr Sutherland, Mr Watt and Mr Wilson and all will offer themselves for re-election. Details of the service agreement for Mr Watt are set out on page 84. None of the other directors seeking re-election has a service agreement. |
| Directors’ interests The interests of the directors in the shares of the company at 31 December 2002 are shown on page 90. None of the directors held an interest in the loan capital of the company or in the shares and loan capital of any of the subsidiary undertakings of the company, during the period from 1 January 2002 to 26 February 2003. |
| Employee proposition The company encourages employees to contribute to the Group’s performance through Total Reward, one of the most comprehensive remuneration packages in the financial services industry. Employee choice, rewarding performance and sharing in the Group’s success are key features of Total Reward. |
| Some 34,000 employees participated in RBSelect, a benefits choice programme, in 2002. Employees can choose from a range of options including discounted childcare and shopping vouchers, private medical insurance and telephone legal advice. |
| Employees can also participate in business-specific bonus or incentive plans, Group profit sharing and sharesave schemes. In each of the last five years, eligible employees have received a further ten percent of their basic salary per annum through Group profit sharing. Both Group profit sharing and sharesave allow employees to acquire shares, and therefore a stake, in the future success of the company. A bonus of five per cent of basic salary was paid to all UK employees whose business units were involved in recognition of their contribution to the successful integration of NatWest. |
| The Group provides pension scheme membership for the majority of its employees in the UK and overseas. The largest scheme is The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Pension Fund, which has some 73,000 employees as members. This is a non-contributory, final salary pension fund and is open to full-time and part-time staff, including fixed-term contractors. |
| Employee communication The Group also encourages employee involvement through a process of employee communication. This includes internal communication activities through a corporate intranet, an in-house magazine, team meetings led by line managers, briefings held by senior managers and regular dialogue with employees and employee representatives. |
| The Group Chief Executive and other senior Group executives regularly communicate directly with employees via ‘Question Time’ style programmes broadcast on the internal television network RBTV, and visits to Group offices. Short films explaining the Group’s annual and interim financial results are also broadcast on RBTV. |
| Employee consultation The Group places great importance on consulting with employees. Every year the Group undertakes an employee opinion survey, which seeks views and feedback on a variety of key topics including leadership, communication, employee involvement, training and development. The latest survey took place in January 2003 when over 110,000 employees were invited to complete surveys either on paper or online, which have been translated into seven different languages. A response rate of 83% was achieved, which is significantly higher than the average for comparable organisations. |
| As a result of the growth in the Group’s business interests in mainland Europe a process has been initiated to establish a European employee information and consultation body to facilitate dialogue amongst employee representatives on employment matters. In addition, an agreement covering the Group is being negotiated with employee representatives from across the Group’s European operations. |
| Diversity The Group is committed to diversity in all areas of recruitment, employment, training and promotion. The Group supports a business model that is based on meritocracy and inclusiveness, where all members of staff can develop their full potential, irrespective of their race, gender, marital status, age, disability, religious belief, political opinion, or sexual orientation. To help it achieve its long term business objectives the Group draws on a wide ranging and diverse pool of talent. The Group also embraces and promotes individual, organisational and cultural differences. |
| Each year the Group participates in a number of diversity-related benchmarking exercises, including the Opportunity Now and Race for Opportunity annual benchmarking exercises, on gender and ethnicity. This enables the Group to evaluate its current position in respect of diversity issues and to identify actions required to further enhance diversity across its businesses. |
page 77
| In May 2002, the Group received the Opportunity Now Silver Award. This means that out of 20 financial sector organisations that participate in the survey, the Group was equal to or above the ‘norm’ for the sector in all categories. In June 2002, the Group received the Race for Opportunity Bronze Award, coming 9th in the ranking of private sector organisations. The Group is also a Core Member of the Employer’s Forum on Age and a Gold Card Member of the Employer’s Forum on Disability, as well as participating in a number of other diversity networks. |
| The Group has established a diversity team which works across its businesses to ensure that diversity remains a key driver in everything it does. |
| Health and safety The health, safety and security of employees is of paramount importance to the Group. Where feasible, single, harmonised policies are in force across the Group. These are now subject to regular review to ensure that they continue to meet current legislation, best practice and the operational needs of the business. |
| Disabled staff The Group recognises its responsibility towards staff with disabilities and seeks to eliminate discrimination on the grounds of disability. The Group recognises the wealth of experience, talent and skill that people with disabilities can bring to the workforce and strives to achieve equality of opportunity in the recruitment, employment and retention of all staff, including those with disabilities. |
| Corporate social responsibility The Group recognises that environmental and social imperatives continue to shape the future and the diversity and flexibility of the Group’s businesses enables it to anticipate and respond to these changes. Business excellence requires that the Group meets changing customer, shareholder, investor, employee and supplier expectations and the Group believes that meeting high standards of environmental, social and ethical responsibility is key to the way it does business. |
| To assist in creating value for all stakeholders, the Group has adopted policies which progressively integrate environmental and social issues into all aspects of its business activities. The objective of these policies is to ensure that its business is conducted in a sustainable and socially responsible way, and to safeguard and enhance the Group’s business and reputation. |
| The Board regularly considers corporate social responsibility issues and receives a formal report on the relevant matters twice each year. |
| Charitable contributions The total amount given for charitable purposes by the company and its subsidiary undertakings during the year ended 31 December 2002 was £14.7 million (2001 – £14.7 million). |
| Corporate governance The company is committed to high standards of Corporate Governance and applies the Principles of Good Governance set out in Section 1 of the Combined Code. Details are given on pages 78 and 79. |
| Policy and practice on payment of creditors In the year ending 31 December 2003, the Group will adhere to the following payment policy in respect of all suppliers. The Group is committed to maintaining a sound commercial relationship with its suppliers. Consequently, it is the Group’s policy to negotiate and agree terms and conditions with its suppliers, which includes the giving of an undertaking to pay suppliers within 30 days of receipt of a correctly prepared invoice submitted in accordance with the terms of the contract or such other payment period as may be agreed. |
| At 31 December 2002, the Group’s trade creditors represented 27 days (2001 – 26 days) of amounts invoiced by suppliers. The company does not have any trade creditors. |
| Auditors The auditors, Deloitte & Touche, have indicated their willingness to continue in office. Resolutions to re-appoint them and to authorise the directors to fix their remuneration will be proposed at the annual general meeting. |
| By order of the Board. |
| Miller
McLean Secretary 26 February 2003 |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc is registered in Scotland No. 45551. |
| page 78 | Corporate governance |
| The Group is committed to high standards of Corporate Governance and the Board of directors believes that this is a key element in ensuring that we continue to deliver value to our shareholders. |
| The Board has reviewed its Corporate Governance practices and an explanation of how the Principles of Good Governance, set out in Section 1 of the Combined Code, which is appended to the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority (“the Code”), have been applied is contained in this report and the Directors’remuneration report on pages 80 to 89. |
| Throughout the year ended 31 December 2002, the company has complied with the provisions set out in Section 1 of the Code. |
| Board of directors The Board of directors comprises the Chairman, six executive directors and eleven non-executive directors. The biographies of the Board members appear on pages 72 and 73. |
| The Board has overall responsibility for leading and controlling the company and is accountable to shareholders for financial and operational performance. |
| The Board has adopted a formal schedule of matters detailing key aspects of the company’s affairs presented to it for decision. In particular, the Board is responsible for approving policy and strategy. Responsibility for the development of policy and strategy and operational management is delegated to the Group Chief Executive and other executive directors. |
| The roles of Chairman and Group Chief Executive are distinct and separate, with a clear division of responsibilities. Mr Bob Scott has been nominated as the senior independent director. The non-executive directors combine broad business and commercial experience with independent and objective judgement. The balance enables the Board to provide clear and effective leadership and maintain the highest standards of integrity across the company’s business activities. The Board has reviewed the independence of the non-executive directors and has reaffirmed that, with the exception of Mr Botin and Mr Inciarte, who are representatives of Santander Central Hispano, S.A., all non-executive directors are considered by the Board to be independent. |
| The Board is supplied with comprehensive Board papers in advance of each Board meeting including financial and business reports covering each of the company’s principal business activities. |
| All directors have access to the advice and services of the secretary who is responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are followed and that applicable rules and regulations are complied with. In addition, all directors are able, if necessary, to obtain independent professional advice at the company’s expense. |
| Board Committees In order to provide effective oversight and leadership the Board has established a number of committees with particular responsibilities. The principal committees are as follows: |
| The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in discharging its responsibilities for accounting policies, financial reporting, internal control, compliance and risk management. The Committee also reviews the independence of the external auditors and the relationship between audit and non-audit work performed by the external auditors. During 2002, it was agreed that all non-audit work performed by the auditors would be approved in advance by the Committee. |
| The Remuneration Committee assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities for executive remuneration policy and the remuneration arrangements for directors. The Directors’remuneration report is contained on pages 80 to 89. |
| The Nominations Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in the formal selection and appointment of directors. The Committee considers potential candidates and recommends appointments of new directors to the Board. This process was followed in respect of the appointment of Mr Colin Buchan to the Board during 2002. |
| Relations with shareholders The company has a programme of communication with shareholders through regular interim and annual reports and the annual general meeting. Shareholders are given the opportunity to participate by asking questions at the annual general meeting and by submitting written questions in advance. The company’s website at www.rbs.co.uk contains information on the Group and the products and services it offers and includes webcasts of the Group’s public conferences. Communication with the company’s largest institutional shareholders is undertaken as part of the company’s investor relations programme. |
page 79
| Internal control The Board of directors is responsible for the Group’s system of internal control that is designed to facilitate effective and efficient operations and to ensure the quality of internal and external reporting and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In devising internal controls, the Group has regard to the nature and extent of the risk, the likelihood of it crystallising and the cost of controls. A system of internal control is designed to manage, but not eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can only provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against the risk of material misstatement, fraud or losses. |
| The Board has established an ongoing process for the identification, evaluation and management of the significant risks faced by the Group, which operated throughout the year ended 31 December 2002 and to 26 February 2003, the date the directors approved the Report and Accounts. This process is regularly reviewed by the Board and meets the requirements of the guidance ‘Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code’ issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in 1999. |
| The effectiveness of the Group’s internal control system is reviewed regularly by the Board and the Audit Committee. Executive management committees or boards of directors in each of the Group’s businesses receive quarterly reports on significant risks facing their business and how they are being controlled. These reports are combined and submitted to the Board as quarterly risk and control assessments. Additional details of the Group’s approach to risk management are given in the ‘Risk management’ section of the ‘Operating and financial review’ on pages 50 to 71. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports from Group Risk Management and Group Internal Audit. In addition, the Group’s independent auditors present to the Audit Committee reports that include details of any significant internal control matters which they have identified. The system of internal controls of the authorised institutions and other regulated entities in the Group are also subject to regulatory oversight in the UK and overseas. |
| Sarbanes-Oxley
Act Under the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new and enhanced standards of corporate governance, and business and financial disclosure, will apply to US public companies and non-US companies, including the company, with securities registered in the US. Some of the new standards and rules affecting the company are already in force and others will come into force during 2003. New standards directly applicable to the company include certifications of the Annual Report on Form 20-F by the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, changes to the role of the Audit Committee and new rules relating to internal controls. The Group is following these developments closely and intends to implement all necessary changes as the new rules come into force. |
| Controls
and procedures Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures The Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, after evaluating the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules under the US Securities Exchange Act) as of a date (the “evaluation date”) within 90 days of the filing date of this annual report, have concluded that as of the evaluation date, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective and designed to ensure that material information relating to the company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities. |
| Changes in internal controls There were no significant changes in the company’s internal controls or, to the knowledge of the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, in other factors that could significantly affect those internal controls subsequent to the evaluation date. |
| page 80 | Directors’ remuneration report |
| The
Remuneration Committee The following directors, all of whom are independent non-executive directors, were members of the Remuneration Committee during the year ended 31 December 2002. |
| Bob Scott (Chairman) Bill Wilson Eileen Mackay (from 27 February 2002) Jim Currie (from 27 February 2002) Sir Iain Vallance (until 27 February 2002) Sir Angus Grossart (until 27 February 2002) Murray Stuart (until 26 April 2002, when he also retired from the Board). |
| During the accounting period, the Remuneration Committee appointed Hewitt Associates and Ernst & Young to provide advice on matters relating to directors’ remuneration. In addition, the Remuneration Committee has taken account of the views of Sir George Mathewson, Chairman, and Fred Goodwin, Group Chief Executive, on performance assessment of the other executive directors. During the early part of 2002, Arthur Andersen, who had been appointed by the Remuneration Committee previously, also provided advice on directors’ remuneration. In addition to advising the Remuneration Committee, Hewitt Associates provided services in connection with the provision of the company’s UK benefits package and Ernst & Young reviewed the company’s distressed lending policies and seconded staff to Group Compliance. |
| Remuneration
policy The executive remuneration policy is kept under review by the Remuneration Committee and is set out below. There have been no material changes to the policy which was approved by shareholders at the company’s annual general meeting in 2002. |
| The objective of the executive remuneration policy is to provide, in the context of the company’s business strategy, remuneration in form and amount which will attract, motivate and retain high calibre executives. In order to achieve this objective, the policy is framed around the following core principles: |
| • | Total rewards will be set at levels that are competitive within the relevant market, taking each executive director’s total remuneration package as a whole. |
| • | Total potential rewards will be earned through achievement of demanding performance targets based on measures consistent with shareholder interests over the short, medium and longer-term. |
| • | Remuneration arrangements will strike an appropriate balance between fixed and performance related rewards. Performance related elements will comprise the major part of executive remuneration packages. |
| • | Incentive plans and performance metrics will be structured to be robust through the business cycle. |
| • | Remuneration arrangements will be designed to support the company’s business strategy, to promote appropriate teamwork and to conform to best practice standards. |
| For the Chairman and non-executive directors, fees are reviewed annually by the Board, on the recommendation of the executive. The level of remuneration reflects the responsibility and time commitment of directors, and the level of fees paid to chairmen and non-executive directors of comparable major UK companies. Non-executive directors do not participate in any incentive or performance plan. |
| Components of executive remuneration |
| UK
based directors Fixed elements Salary Salaries are reviewed annually as part of total remuneration having regard to remuneration packages received by executives of comparable companies. The Remuneration Committee uses a range of survey data from remuneration consultants and reaches individual salary decisions taking account of the remuneration environment and the performance and responsibilities of the individual director. |
| Benefits UK-based executive directors are eligible to participate in The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Pension Fund (“the RBS Fund”). The RBS Fund is a non-contributory defined benefit fund which provides pensions and other benefits within Inland Revenue limits. Certain directors receive additional pension and life assurance benefits in excess of Inland Revenue limits. Details of pension arrangements are shown on page 89. |
page 81
| Executives directors are eligible to receive a choice of various employee benefits or a cash equivalent, on a similar basis as other employees. In addition, executive directors are eligible to participate in sharesave and the Group profit sharing scheme, which currently pays up to 10 per cent of salaries, depending on the Group’s performance. The sharesave and profit sharing schemes are not subject to performance conditions since they are operated on an all-employee basis. Executive directors also receive death in service benefits. |
| Short-term
annual incentives This typically focuses from year to year on the delivery of a combination of appropriate Group and individual financial and operational targets approved by the Remuneration Committee. Individual UK-based executive directors normally have a maximum annual bonus potential of 100 per cent of salary, although for exceptional performance, as measured by the achievement of significant objectives, bonuses of up to 200 per cent of salary may be awarded. |
| UK-based executive directors received total annual bonuses of up to 200 per cent of salary for the year ended 31 December 2002. The payment of these bonuses reflected the excellent trading results and the exceptional performance culminating in the successful integration of NatWest. The integration was achieved ahead of the targets announced at the time of the NatWest takeover and delivered considerable income benefits and cost savings, details of which are given on page 44. |
| Longer-term
incentives The company provides longer-term incentives in the form of share options and share or share equivalent awards. Their objective is to encourage the creation of value over the longer-term and to align the rewards of the executive directors with the returns to shareholders. |
| Medium-term performance plan The medium-term performance plan was approved by shareholders in April 2000. Each executive director is eligible for an annual award under the plan in the form of share or share equivalent awards, within the overall limit of one and a half times earnings. The awards made in 2002 were one times salary. |
| The plan is highly geared to the company’s relative performance. All awards under the plan are subject to three-year performance targets. First, the annual growth in the company’s earnings per share must exceed the annualised growth of the Retail Prices Index (“RPI”) plus 3 per cent. If this condition is satisfied, the company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) is compared with the TSR of a comparator group of certain companies in the financial services sector, referred to below. Awards under the plan will not vest if the company’s TSR is below the median of the comparator group. Achievement of the EPS target and median TSR performance against the comparator companies will result in the vesting of 50 per cent of the award, increasing on a sliding scale to 100 per cent at upper quartile performance and 200 per cent at upper decile performance. This combination of EPS and TSR performance targets measures the underlying financial performance of the company and ensures a direct link between the value delivered to shareholders and the levels of incentive payment. |
| The companies in the comparator group are Abbey National plc; Aviva plc; Barclays PLC; Citigroup; HBOS plc; HSBC Holdings plc; Legal & General Group plc; Lloyds TSB Group plc; Prudential plc and Standard Chartered PLC. In choosing the comparator group, it was recognised that while the company has significant international business, the bulk of its operations are UK based. Consequently the comparator group for the award in 2001 focused on the UK financial services sector. In respect of grants made in 2002 and subsequent years, the comparator group was reviewed and, following the merger of Halifax with Bank of Scotland, Citigroup was added to the group. |
| Options The executive share option scheme was approved by shareholders in January 1999. Each executive director is eligible for the annual grant of an option, typically equal to one times salary, over shares at the market value at date of grant. No payment is made by the executive on the grant of an option award. |
| All executive options are subject to a performance target, which is currently that the options are not exercisable unless the growth in the company’s earnings per share (“EPS”) over three years has exceeded the growth in RPI plus 9 per cent. This EPS performance target, which is consistent with market practice, measures underlying financial performance and represents a stretching long-term test of performance. |
| Should the company fail the performance condition at the end of the initial three-year period, performance will be re-tested at the end of the following year and subsequent years within the lifetime of the grant. The test of performance after the initial three-year period uses either the EPS in the final year immediately preceding the three-year period, or the EPS in the year preceding the grant, whichever is the higher. The Remuneration Committee believes that this provides a significant test, more stretching than that applied normally for organisations allowing retesting, and allows the share options to form an incentive for corporate performance in the long term. The condition is reviewed annually. |
| page 82 | Directors' remuneration report continued |
| US
based director – Mr Lawrence Fish Fixed elements Salary Mr Fish’s salary is reviewed annually as part of total remuneration having regard to levels of remuneration paid to executives of comparable US companies and Mr Fish’s performance. |
| Benefits Mr Fish accrues pension benefits under a number of arrangements in the US. Details are provided on page 89. In addition, Mr Fish is entitled to receive other benefits on a similar basis to other employees. |
| Short-term
annual incentives Mr Fish’s short-term performance rewards take the form of an annual incentive plan which rewards the achievement of Group, business unit and individual financial and non-financial targets. In line with US market practice, the maximum annual bonus potential is normally 200 per cent of salary, although additional amounts may be awarded, at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, for exceptional performance as measured by the achievement of significant objectives. |
| In addition to his annual bonus targets set at the beginning of the year, Mr Fish was set stretching targets during 2002 in relation to the integration of the Mellon Regional Franchise. Having successfully met these targets and completed the integration of the Mellon Regional Franchise during the year, the Remuneration Committee has exercised its discretion and awarded Mr Fish a special bonus of an additional 200 per cent of salary. |
| Longer-term
incentives Mr Fish participates under two longer-term incentive plans established for executives of Citizens. The Remuneration Committee believes that it is appropriate to include, as part of his total remuneration package, an element of reward which is based on the value created in Citizens. It is also necessary to ensure that Mr Fish’s total remuneration package is competitive for the US market. |
| Citizens long term incentive plan Mr Fish is eligible for an annual award under the Citizens Long Term Incentive Plan, a cash compensation plan designed to reward participants for achieving long-term financial results. A separate three-year cycle commences each year. The maximum award payable to him annually is 105 per cent of his average salary over the previous three-year period. These awards are not, in normal circumstances, payable until the relevant three-year performance target has been met. Each three-year performance target is based on the annual pre-tax income target for Citizens. For the maximum award to be paid in respect of each three-year target, Citizens must achieve 130 per cent of the three-year aggregate budgeted profit figure. This performance target has been chosen because it focuses on the profit targets of Citizens, which the Remuneration Committee believes are challenging, and aligns Mr Fish’s reward with the performance of Citizens. This performance target is measured by taking the pre-tax income for Citizens, which is a simple and transparent method of measuring a profit figure target. |
| Citizens Phantom 2000 plan Mr Fish has received two annual grants of awards under the Phantom 2000 Plan and, in line with the grant schedule put in place when the plan was approved by shareholders in 2000, no further awards will be made to him. Under this plan, units are awarded which are a cash-based proxy for share options. The value of the units at the time of vesting is performance-linked and depends on a formula, based on the absolute cumulative levels of economic profit generated by Citizens, the trend in economic profit earnings, and on the external market trends in the US banking sector, using the price/earnings ratios of comparator banks. This performance target has been chosen because it establishes a clear link between the level of potential incentive and the performance of Citizens. It is designed to provide competitive executive rewards in the US environment. Mr Fish may, in normal circumstances, exercise the award only between four and five years from the date of grant. |
page 83
| The
performance graph The undernoted performance graph illustrates the performance of the company over the past five years in terms of total shareholder return compared with that of the companies comprising the FTSE 100 index. This index has been selected because it represents a cross-section of leading UK companies. |
 |
| Service
contracts The company’s policy in relation to the duration of contracts with directors is that executive directors’contracts generally continue until termination by either party, subject to the required notice, or until retirement date. The notice period under the service contracts of executive directors will not normally exceed 12 months. However, the notice period may exceed 12 months if existing service contracts have notice periods greater than 12 months and the Remuneration Committee considers it appropriate not to reduce the existing notice period. In relation to newly recruited executive directors, subject to the prior approval of the Remuneration Committee, the notice period from the employing company required to terminate the contract will not normally exceed 12 months unless there is a clear case for this. Where a longer period of notice is initially approved on appointment, it will normally be structured such that it will automatically reduce to 12 months in due course. |
| All new service contracts for executive directors will be subject to approval by the Remuneration Committee. It will be the norm to include in those contracts standard clauses covering the performance review process, the company’s normal disciplinary procedure, and terms for dismissal in the event of failure to perform or in situations involving actions in breach of the Group’s policies. |
| page 84 | Directors' remuneration report continued |
| Any compensation payment made in connection with the departure of an executive director will be subject to approval by the Remuneration Committee, having regard to the terms of the service contract and the reasons for termination. Information regarding executive directors’ service contracts is summarised in the table and notes below. |
| Name | Date
of current contract/ Employing company |
Normal retirement age | Notice
period - from company |
Notice
period - from executive |
|
| Fred Goodwin | 25 June 1998 | 60 | 12 months | 6 months | |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | |||||
| Norman McLuskie | 9 October 1997 | 60 | 3 months | 3 months | |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | |||||
| Gordon Pell | 22 May 2002 | 60 | 13 months | 6 months | |
| National Westminster Bank Plc | |||||
| Iain Robertson | 27 March 2002 | 60 | 12 months | 6 months | |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | |||||
| Fred Watt | 28 September 2000 | 60 | 12 months | 6 months | |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | |||||
| Lawrence Fish | 1 July 1996 | – | 24 months | 12 months | |
| Citizens Financial Group Inc | |||||
| Except as noted below, in the event of severance of contract where any contractual notice period is not worked, the employing company may pay a sum to the executive in lieu of this period of notice. Any such payment would, at maximum, comprise his base salary and a cash value in respect of fixed benefits (including pension plan contributions). In the event of failure to perform, or in situations involving breach of the employing company’s policies resulting in dismissal, reduced or no compensation will be made to the executive. Depending on the circumstances of the termination of employment, the executive may be entitled, or the Remuneration Committee may exercise its discretion to allow, the executive to exercise outstanding awards under long-term incentive arrangements. Exceptions to these severance arrangements are as follows: |
| • | If Mr McLuskie’s contract is terminated by the Bank before he reaches age 60, he is entitled to a payment of three months’ base salary, annual bonus and benefits in lieu of notice plus up to 57 weeks’ pay and an immediate pension without actuarial reduction. If his contract is terminated by the Bank within 12 months of a change of control, he is entitled to a payment equal to twice his annual salary at the time of such notice, and an immediate pension. |
| • | Mr Pell’s contractual notice period was 13 months as at 31 December 2002, and this reduced to 12 months at 5 January 2003. If Mr Pell’s contract is terminated early by NatWest without notice, he is entitled to a compensation payment of base salary relating to the notice period, his annual bonus to the date of termination, a payment equal to the average annual bonus over the previous three years, payment in lieu of contractual benefits and allowances including pension and extra payments by way of funded or unfunded pension and death in service contributions relating to the notice period. |
| • | If Mr Watt’s contract is terminated through redundancy, he is entitled to payment in lieu of notice and a cash payment calculated by reference to his length of service. Currently this entitlement is equal to 9 months’ salary, and an additional payment calculated by reference to age and service which is less than one week’s salary. |
| • | Mr Fish’s notice period and termination arrangements reflect market practice in the US at the time the contract was entered into and it is not considered in the best interests of shareholders to seek to renegotiate Mr Fish’s contract at this time. If his contract is terminated without cause, or if Mr Fish terminates the contract for good reason (as defined in the contract, including a change of control of Citizens, the company or the Royal Bank), he is entitled to a lump sum payment to compensate him for the loss of salary, annual bonus and bonus paid under the Citizens Long Term Incentive Plan in relation to the period he would have worked had notice been given by Citizens. Mr Fish would also be entitled to receive for this period health, life insurance and long term disability coverage and any other benefits determined in accordance with the plans, policies and practices of Citizens at the time of termination. If his contract is terminated by Citizens without cause within twelve months following a change of control, Mr Fish is entitled to receive a lump sum payment and benefits as set out above, but calculated by reference to a period of 36 months. |
page 85
| Chairman
and non-executive directors The original date of appointment as a director of the company and the scheduled date for the next re-election is as follows: |
| Date first appointed | Next re-election | ||
| Sir George Mathewson | 1.9.87 | 29.4.04 | |
| Sir Iain Vallance | 14.1.93 | 29.4.04 | |
| Sir Angus Grossart | 30.9.85 | 29.4.04 | |
| Emilio Botin | 23.1.91 | 28.4.03 | |
| Colin Buchan | 1.6.02 | 28.4.03 | |
| Jim Currie | 28.11.01 | 29.4.04 | |
| Juan Inciarte | 25.2.98 | 4.05 | |
| Eileen Mackay | 16.5.96 | 28.4.03 | |
| Cameron McLatchie | 1.10.98 | Retired on 26.4.02 | |
| Sir Steve Robson | 25.7.01 | 4.05 | |
| Bob Scott | 31.1.01 | 28.4.03 | |
| Murray Stuart | 24.1.96 | Retired on 26.4.02 | |
| Peter Sutherland | 31.1.01 | 28.4.03 | |
| Bill Wilson | 26.5.93 | 28.4.03 | |
| Non-executive directors do not have service contracts or notice periods, although under the company’s articles of association, all directors must retire by rotation and seek re-election by shareholders at least every three years. |
| No compensation would be paid to the Chairman or to any non-executive director in the event of early termination. |
| The tables and explanatory notes on pages 86 to 89 report the remuneration of each director for the year ended 31 December 2002. This information has been audited by the company’s auditors, Deloitte & Touche. |
| page 86 | Directors' remuneration report continued |
| Directors' remuneration |
| Salary/ fees £000 |
Performance bonus* £000 |
Benefits £000 |
2002 Total £000 |
2001 Total £000 |
||
| Chairman | ||||||
| Sir George Mathewson | 449 | - | 19 | 468 | 483 | |
| Executive directors | ||||||
| Fred Goodwin | 832 | 1,733 | 15 | 2,580 | 1,572 | |
| Lawrence Fish | 665 | 2,661 | 26 | 3,352 | 2,213 | |
| Norman McLuskie | 447 | 913 | 15 | 1,375 | 685 | |
| Gordon Pell | 570 | 1,155 | - | 1,725 | 1,039 | |
| Iain Robertson | 656 | 687 | 10 | 1,353 | 1,114 | |
| Fred Watt | 466 | 966 | 1 | 1,433 | 690 | |
| * | includes 10% non-pensionable profit sharing |
| Basic salary is the only component of the remuneration package which is pensionable. |
| Non-executive directors | Board
fees £000 |
Board committee fees £000 |
2002 Total £000 |
2001 Total £000 |
||
| Vice-chairmen | ||||||
| Sir Iain Vallance | 100 | - | 100 | 100 | ||
| Sir Angus Grossart | 100 | - | 100 | 100 | ||
| Emilio Botin | 44 | - | 44 | 40 | ||
| Colin Buchan (appointed 1 June 2002) | 25 | 3 | 28 | - | ||
| Jim Currie | 44 | 8 | 52 | 3 | ||
| Juan Inciarte | 44 | - | 44 | 40 | ||
| Eileen Mackay | 44 | 19 | 63 | 53 | ||
| Cameron McLatchie (retired 26 April 2002) | 14 | - | 14 | 40 | ||
| Sir Steve Robson | 44 | 10 | 54 | 20 | ||
| Bob Scott | 44 | 23 | 67 | 51 | ||
| Murray Stuart (retired 26 April 2002) | 14 | 10 | 24 | 68 | ||
| Peter Sutherland | 44 | - | 44 | 37 | ||
| Bill Wilson | 44 | 38 | 82 | 73 | ||
| No director received any expense allowances chargeable to UK income tax or compensation for loss of office/termination payment. The non-executive directors did not receive any bonus payments or benefits. |
page 87
| Share
options Options to subscribe for ordinary shares of 25p each in the company granted to, and exercised by, directors during the year to 31 December 2002 are included in the table below: |
| Options
held at 1 January 2002 |
Options granted in 2002 |
Options exercised in 2002 | Options held at 31 December 2002 | ||||||
| Number | Market
price date at of exercise £ |
Option
Price £ |
Number | Exercise Period | |||||
| Sir George Mathewson | 69,257 | 9.33 | 69,257 | 11.5.01 - 10.5.08 | |||||
| 147,247 | 7.81 | 147,247 | 29.3.03 - 28.3.10 | ||||||
| 150 | 12.40 | 150 | 9.08.03 - 8.08.06 | * | |||||
| 20,100 | 17.18 | 20,100 | 14.08.04 - 13.08.11 | ||||||
| 1,347 | 13.64 | 1,347 | 1.10.08 - 31.03.09 | * | |||||
| 19,500 | 18.18 | 19,500 | 14.03.05 - 13.03.12 | ||||||
| 238,101 | 19,500 | - | 257,601 | ||||||
| Fred Goodwin | 164,571 | 8.75 | 164,571 | 7.12.01 - 6.12.08 | |||||
| 2,963 | 11.18 | 2,963 | 4.3.02 - 3.3.09 | ||||||
| 27,306 | 11.97 | 27,306 | 3.6.02 - 2.6.09 | ||||||
| 153,648 | 7.81 | 153,648 | 29.3.03 - 28.3.10 | ||||||
| 150 | 12.40 | 150 | 9.8.03 - 8.8.06 | * | |||||
| 43,700 | 17.18 | 43,700 | 14.8.04 - 13.8.11 | ||||||
| 1,713 | 9.85 | 1,713 | 1.10.05 - 31.3.06 | * | |||||
| 41,300 | 18.18 | 41,300 | 14.3.05 - 13.3.12 | ||||||
| 394,051 | 41,300 | - | 435,351 | ||||||
| Lawrence Fish | 107,877 | 9.33 | 107,877 | 11.5.01 - 10.5.08 | |||||
| 150 | 12.40 | 150 | 9.8.03 - 8.8.06 | * | |||||
| 108,027 | - | - | 108,027 | ||||||
| Norman McLuskie | 1,046 | 1,046 | 18.29 | 4.61 | - | ||||
| 149 | 149 | 18.29 | 10.06 | - | |||||
| 16,613 | 9.33 | 16,613 | 11.5.01 - 10.5.08 | ||||||
| 8,860 | 11.18 | 8,860 | 4.3.02 - 3.3.09 | ||||||
| 11,356 | 11.97 | 11,356 | 3.6.02 - 2.6.09 | ||||||
| 33,291 | 7.81 | 33,291 | 29.3.03 - 28.3.10 | ||||||
| 150 | 12.40 | 150 | 9.8.03 - 8.8.06 | * | |||||
| 90 | 9.85 | 90 | 1.10.03 - 31.3.04 | * | |||||
| 23,300 | 17.18 | 23,300 | 14.8.04 - 13.8.11 | ||||||
| 335 | 13.64 | 335 | 1.10.04 - 31.3.05 | * | |||||
| 22,100 | 18.18 | 22,100 | 14.3.05 - 13.3.12 | ||||||
| 335 | 12.35 | 335 | 1.10.05 - 31.3.06 | * | |||||
| 95,190 | 22,435 | 1,195 | 116,430 | ||||||
| Gordon Pell | 51,216 | 7.81 | 51,216 | 29.3.03 - 28.3.10 | |||||
| 150 | 12.40 | 150 | 9.8.03 - 8.8.06 | * | |||||
| 29,100 | 17.18 | 29,100 | 14.8.04 - 13.8.11 | ||||||
| 27,600 | 18.18 | 27,600 | 14.3.05 - 13.3.12 | ||||||
| 80,466 | 27,600 | - | 108,066 | ||||||
| Iain Robertson | 56,635 | 9.33 | 56,635 | 11.5.01 - 10.5.08 | |||||
| 82,654 | 11.18 | 82,654 | 4.3.02 - 3.3.09 | ||||||
| 128,040 | 7.81 | 128,040 | 29.3.03 - 28.3.10 | ||||||
| 150 | 12.40 | 150 | 9.8.03 - 8.8.06 | * | |||||
| 393 | 9.85 | 393 | 1.10.03 - 31.3.04 | * | |||||
| 36,400 | 17.18 | 36,400 | 14.8.04 - 13.8.11 | ||||||
| 304,272 | - | - | 304,272 | ||||||
| Fred Watt | 70,148 | 12.83 | 70,148 | 4.9.03 - 3.9.10 | |||||
| 23,300 | 17.18 | 23,300 | 14.8.04 - 13.8.11 | ||||||
| 710 | 13.64 | 710 | 1.10.04 - 31.3.05 | * | |||||
| 22,100 | 18.18 | 22,100 | 14.3.05 - 13.3.12 | ||||||
| 94,158 | 22,100 | - | 116,258 | ||||||
| * | Options held under the sharesave and option 2000 schemes, which are not subject to performance conditions. |
| page 88 | Directors' remuneration report continued |
| No options had their terms and conditions varied during the accounting period to 31 December 2002. No payment is required on the award of an option. |
| The executive share options which are exercisable from March 2002 onwards are subject to the satisfaction of an EPS growth target such that no option is exercisable unless the growth in the company’s earnings per share over three years has exceeded the growth in the RPI plus 9%. In respect of executive share options exercisable before March 2002 the performance condition is that the growth in the company’s EPS over three years has exceeded the growth in the RPI plus 6%. |
| The market price of the company’s ordinary shares at 31st December 2002 was £14.88 and the range during the year to 31 December 2002 was £11.95 to £20.60. |
| Medium-term performance plan |
| Awards granted during year | |||||||
| Scheme interest (share equivalents) at 1 January 2002 |
Scheme interest (share equivalents) awarded |
Market
price on award |
End
of the period for qualifying conditions to be fulfilled |
Benefits
received during the year |
Interest
at 31 December 2002 |
||
| Fred Goodwin | 68,807 | 31.12.03 | 68,807 | ||||
| 44,378 | £18.59 | 31.12.04 | Nil | 44,378 | |||
| 68,807 | 44,378 | - | - | - | 113,185 | ||
| Norman McLuskie | 36,697 | 31.12.03 | 36,697 | ||||
| 23,399 | £18.59 | 31.12.04 | Nil | 23,399 | |||
| 36,697 | 23,399 | - | - | - | 60,096 | ||
| Gordon Pell | 45,871 | 31.12.03 | 45,871 | ||||
| 29,585 | £18.59 | 31.12.04 | Nil | 29,585 | |||
| 45,871 | 29,585 | - | - | 75,456 | |||
| Iain Robertson | 57,339 | 31.12.03 | 57,339 | ||||
| Nil | Nil | ||||||
| 57,339 | - | - | - | - | 57,339 | ||
| Fred Watt | 36,697 | 31.12.03 | 36,697 | ||||
| 24,744 | £18.59 | 31.12.04 | Nil | 24,744 | |||
| 36,697 | 24,744 | - | - | - | 61,441 | ||
| No variation was made to any of the terms of the plan during the year. The performance measures are detailed on page 81. |
| Phantom 2000 plan |
| Awards granted during year | |||||||
| Phantom
2000 units at 1 January 2002t |
Units
awarded during year |
Market
price on award |
End
of the period for qualifying conditions to be fulfilled |
Benefits
received during the year |
Phantom
2000 units at 31 December 2002 |
||
| Lawrence Fish | 1,000,000 | 1.1.04 | 1,000,000 | ||||
| 1,000,000 | US$2.76 | 1.1.05 | Nil | 1,000,000 | |||
| 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | - | - | - | 2,000,000 | ||
| No variation was made to any of the terms of the plan during the year. The performance measures are detailed on page 82. |
| Citizens long-term incentive plan |
| Interests at 1 January 2002 | Awards
granted during year |
Benefits
received during the year |
Interests
at 31 December 2002 |
||
| Lawrence Fish | LTIP* awards for the | LTIP award for the | LTIP award for the | LTIP* awards for the | |
| 3 year periods: | 3 year period: | 3 year period: | 3 year periods: | ||
| 1.1.99 - 31.12.01 | 1.1.02 - 31.12.04 | 1.1.99 - 31.12.01 | 1.1.00 - 31.12.02 | ||
| 1.1.00 - 31.12.02 | was $821,303 | 1.1.01 - 31.12.03 | |||
| 1.1.01 - 31.12.03 | 1.1.02 - 31.12.04 | ||||
| * | Under the cash LTIP, target payment is 60% of average salary over the 3 year period, maximum payment is 105% of average salary. |
| No variation was made to any of the terms of the plan during the year. The performance measures are detailed on page 82. |
page 89
| Directors'
pension arrangements During the year, Mr Goodwin, Mr Robertson, Mr McLuskie, Mr Pell and Mr Watt participated in The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Pension Fund (“the RBS Fund”). The RBS Fund is a defined benefit fund which provide pensions and other benefits within Inland Revenue limits. |
| The pension entitlements of Mr Goodwin, Mr Robertson, Mr Pell and Mr Watt within the RBS Fund are restricted by Inland Revenue limits as set out in the Finance Act 1989. Additional life assurance cover in excess of these limits is provided by a separate arrangement. Arrangements have been made to provide Mr Goodwin and Mr Pell with additional pension benefits on a defined benefit basis outwith the RBS Fund. The figures shown below include the accrual in respect of these arrangements. Mr Watt is provided with additional pension benefits on a defined contribution basis and contributions made in the year are shown below. |
| Sir George Mathewson receives life insurance cover under an individual arrangement. |
| Mr Fish accrues pension benefits under a number of arrangements in the USA. Defined benefits are built up under the Citizens’ Qualified Plan, Excess Plan and Employee Arrangement. In addition, he is a member of two defined contribution arrangements – a Qualified 401(K) Plan and Executive Supplemental Benefit Plan. |
| In previous year’s accounts, disclosures of these benefits have been made under the requirements of the Stock Exchange Listing Rules and the Combined Code. These Rules are still in place, but it is now also necessary to make disclosure in accordance with the Director’s Remuneration Report Regulations 2002. The information below sets out the disclosures under the two sets of requirements. |
| Defined benefit arrangements | Age
at 31 December 2002 |
Accrued entitlement at 31 December 2002 000 p.a. |
Additional pension earned during the year ended 31 December 2002 000 p.a. |
Additional pension earned during the year ended 31 December 2002* 000 p.a. |
Transfer value as at 31 December 2002 000 |
Transfer value as at 31 December 2001 000 |
Increase |
Transfer
value for the additional pension excluding inflation earned during the year ended 31 December 2002 000 |
||
| Fred Goodwin | 44 | £276 | £48 | £44 | £1,900 | £1,868 | £32 | £301 | ||
| Norman McLuskie | 58 | £166 | £25 | £22 | £2,624 | £2,169 | £455 | £343 | ||
| Gordon Pell | 52 | £212 | £10 | £10 | £2,366 | £2,536 | £(170 | ) | £105 | |
| Iain Robertson | 57 | £25 | £3 | £2 | £353 | £323 | £30 | £33 | ||
| Fred Watt | 42 | £4 | £2 | £2 | £23 | £15 | £8 | £10 | ||
| Lawrence
Fish – Qualified Plan |
58 | $30 | $6 | $6 | $200 | $153 | $47 | $40 | ||
| – Excess Plan | $224 | $56 | $56 | $1,483 | $1,064 | $419 | $369 | |||
| – Employee Arrangement |
$389 | $149 | $149 | $4,965 | $2,810 | $2,155 | $1,769 | |||
| * | net of statutory revaluation applying to deferred pensions |
(1) |
Notes: There is a significant difference in the forms of disclosure required by the Combined Code and the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002. The former requires the disclosure of the additional pension earned during the year and the transfer value equivalent to this pension based on stock market conditions at the end of the year. The latter requires the disclosure of the difference between the transfer value at the start and end of the year and is therefore dependent on the change in stock market conditions over the course of the year. |
| (2) | During 2002, equity markets fell substantially and therefore the transfer value for Mr Pell also fell, leading to the negative figure in the above table. The same effect occurred for Mr Goodwin and Mr Watt but was offset by the additional pension earned during the year. Transfer values for those who are closer to retirement age are dependent more on gilt yields than equity yields and therefore did not fall over the year. |
| (3) | The figures for Mr Pell include an additional pension secured by a transfer from his previous employer which increases in line with revaluation not salary inflation. |
| Contributions and allowances paid under defined contribution arrangements were: |
| 2002 000 |
2001 000 |
||
| Fred Watt | £93 | £83 | |
| Lawrence Fish | $90 | $27 | |
| Bob
Scott, Chairman of the Remuneration Committee 26 February 2003 |
| page 90 | Directors’ interests in shares |
| Ordinary shares The following directors held a beneficial interest in the company’s ordinary shares: |
| 31
December 2002 |
1
January 2002 or date of appointment if later |
31
December 2002 |
1
January 2002 or date of appointment if later |
||||
| Lawrence Fish | 11,120 | 10,950 | Iain Robertson | 120,904 | 117,777 | ||
| Fred Goodwin | 64,703 | 64,703 | Bob Scott | 1,445 | 1,437 | ||
| Eileen Mackay | 6,086 | 6,086 | Sir Iain Vallance | 2,500 | 2,500 | ||
| Sir George Mathewson | 247,948 | 247,075 | Fred Watt | 7,223 | - | ||
| Norman McLuskie | 150,037 | 145,290 | Bill Wilson | 9,547 | 9,421 | ||
| Gordon Pell | 432 | - | |||||
| Mr Botin, Mr Buchan, Dr Currie, Sir Angus Grossart, Mr Inciarte, Sir Steve Robson and Mr Sutherland did not have an interest in the company’s ordinary shares during the year. |
| Additional Value Shares The following directors held a beneficial interest in the company’s Additional Value Shares: |
| 31
December 2002 |
1
January 2002 or date of appointment if later |
31
December 2002 |
1
January 2002 or date of appointment if later |
||||
| Lawrence Fish | 10,950 | 10,950 | Norman McLuskie | 26,584 | 26,584 | ||
| Fred Goodwin | 64,703 | 64,703 | Iain Robertson | 112,747 | 112,747 | ||
| Eileen Mackay | 6,086 | 6,086 | Sir Iain Vallance | 2,500 | 2,500 | ||
| Sir George Mathewson | 173,674 | 173,674 | Bill Wilson | 9,237 | 9,237 | ||
| Mr Botin, Mr Buchan, Dr Currie, Sir Angus Grossart, Mr Inciarte, Mr Pell, Sir Steve Robson, Mr Scott, Mr Sutherland and Mr Watt did not have an interest in the company’s Additional Value Shares during the year. |
| Preference shares Mr Fish held 20,000 non-cumulative US$ preference shares of US$0.01 each at 31 December 2002 (2001 – nil). No other director had an interest in the preference shares during the year. |
| Loan notes No director had an interest in loan notes during the year. |
| The company’s Register of Directors’ Interests, which is open to inspection, contains full details of directors’ shareholdings and options to subscribe. |
| There has been no change in the directors’ interests in the shares of the company shown above between 31 December 2002 and 26 February 2003. No director held a non-beneficial interest in the shares of the company at 31 December 2002, at 1 January 2002 or date of appointment if later. |
page 91
| Statement of directors' responsibilities |
| United Kingdom company law requires the directors to prepare accounts for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and the Group as at the end of the financial year and of the profit or loss of the Group for that year. In preparing those accounts, the directors are required to: |
| • | select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; |
| • | make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and |
| • | state whether applicable accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the accounts. |
| The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and to enable them to ensure that the accounts comply with the Companies Act 1985. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. |
| By order of the Board. |
| Miller
McLean Secretary 26 February 2003 |
| page 92 | Independent
auditors' report to the members of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc |
| We have audited the consolidated financial statements of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (“the company”) and its subsidiaries (together “the Group”) for the year ended 31 December 2002, which comprise the accounting policies, the balance sheets as at 31 December 2002 and 2001, the profit and loss accounts, the cash flow statements, the statements of total recognised gains and losses, the reconciliation of movements in shareholders’ funds for the three years ended 31 December 2002 and the related notes 1 to 53. These financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out therein. We have also audited the information in the part of the directors’ remuneration report that is described as having been audited. |
| Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors As described in the ‘Statement of directors’ responsibilities’, the company’s directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and accounting standards. They are also responsible for the preparation of the other information contained in the annual report including the directors’ remuneration report. Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report described as having been audited in accordance with relevant United Kingdom legal and regulatory requirements and auditing standards. |
| We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and fair view and whether the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report described as having been audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. We also report to you if, in our opinion, the directors’ report is not consistent with the financial statements, if the company has not kept proper accounting records, if we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit, or if information specified by law regarding directors’ remuneration and transactions with the company and other members of the Group is not disclosed. |
| We review whether the corporate governance statement reflects the company’s compliance with the seven provisions of the Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority, and we report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether the Board’s statements on internal control cover all risks and controls, or to form an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s corporate governance procedures or its risk and control procedures. |
| We read the directors’ report and the other information contained in the 2002 Annual Report as described in the contents section including the unaudited part of the directors’ remuneration report and consider the implications for our report if we become aware of any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial statements. |
| Basis of audit opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with United Kingdom auditing standards issued by the Auditing Practices Board and with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States of America. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report described as having been audited. It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the financial statements and of whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the circumstances of the company and the Group, consistently applied and adequately disclosed. |
| We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report described as having been audited are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion, we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report described as having been audited. |
| UK opinion In our opinion the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and the Group as at 31 December 2002 and of the profit and cash flows of the Group for the year then ended and the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report described as having been audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. |
| US opinion In our opinion the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2002 and 2001 and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom. |
| Accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of net income for the each of the three years ended 31 December 2002 and the determination of shareholders’ equity as at 31 December 2002 and 2001, to the extent summarised in Note 53 to the financial statements. |
| Deloitte
& Touche Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors Edinburgh 26 February 2003 |
page 93
| Accounting policies |
| The accounts have been prepared in accordance with applicable Accounting Standards in the UK and the Statements of Recommended Accounting Practice issued by the British Bankers’ Association and by the Finance and Leasing Association. A summary of the more important accounting policies is set out below. The consolidated accounts are prepared in accordance with the special provisions of Part VII of the Companies Act 1985 (“the Act”) relating to banking groups. The accounts of the company are prepared in accordance with section 226 of, and Schedule 4 to, the Act and, as permitted by section 230(3) of the Act, no profit and loss account is presented. |
| 1 | Accounting convention and bases of consolidation The accounts are prepared under the historical cost convention modified by the periodic revaluation of premises and certain investments. To avoid undue delay in the presentation of the Group’s accounts, the accounts of certain subsidiary undertakings have been made up to 30 November. There have been no changes in respect of these subsidiary undertakings, in the period from their balance sheet dates to 31 December, that materially affect the view given by the Group’s accounts. |
| 2 | Revenue recognition Interest receivable is credited to the profit and loss account as it accrues unless there is significant doubt that it can be collected (as described in the accounting policy on loans and advances). |
| Fees receivable that represent a return for services provided are recognised in the profit and loss account so as to match the cost of providing the service. Certain front-end lending fees are recognised over the life of the loan. |
| Securities and derivatives held for trading are recorded at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognised in dealing profits together with dividends from, and interest receivable and payable on, trading business assets and liabilities. |
| 3 | Goodwill Goodwill is the excess of the cost of acquisition of subsidiary and associated undertakings over the fair value of the Group’s share of net tangible assets acquired. Goodwill arising on acquisitions of subsidiary and associated undertakings after 1 October 1998 is capitalised on the balance sheet and amortised on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful economic life, currently over periods of up to 20 years. Capitalised goodwill is reviewed for impairment at the end of the first full year following an acquisition and subsequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable in full. Goodwill arising on acquisitions of subsidiary and associated undertakings prior to 1 October 1998, previously charged directly against profit and loss account reserves, was not reinstated under the transitional provisions of FRS 10 ‘Goodwill and Intangible Assets’. It will be written back only on disposal of the related subsidiary or associated undertaking and reflected in the calculation of the gains or losses arising. |
| 4 | Foreign currencies Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Profit and loss accounts of overseas branches and subsidiary undertakings are translated at the average rates of exchange for the period. Exchange differences arising from the application of closing rates of exchange to the opening net assets of overseas branches and subsidiary undertakings and from restating their results from average to period-end rates are taken to profit and loss account reserves, together with exchange differences arising on related foreign currency borrowings. All other exchange differences are included in operating profit. |
| 5 | Pensions and other post-retirement benefits The Group provides post-retirement benefits in the form of pensions and healthcare plans to eligible employees. The cost of defined benefit pension schemes and healthcare plans is assessed by independent professionally qualified actuaries and recognised on a systematic basis over employees’ service lives. Contributions to defined contribution pension schemes are recognised in the profit and loss account when payable. |
| 6 | Leases Contracts to lease assets are classified as finance leases if they transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to the customer. Other contracts to lease assets are classified as operating leases. Total gross earnings under finance leases are allocated to accounting periods using the actuarial after tax method to give a constant periodic rate of return on the net cash investment. Finance lease receivables are stated in the balance sheet at the amount of the net investment in the lease. Rental income from operating leases is credited to the profit and loss account on a receivable basis over the term of the lease. Balance sheet carrying values of finance lease receivables and operating lease assets include amounts in respect of the residual values of the leased assets. Unguaranteed residual values are subject to regular review to identify potential impairments. Provisions are made for impairment arising on specific asset categories. |
| 7 | General insurance In calculating operating profit from general insurance activities, premiums are recognised in the accounting period in which they begin. Unearned premiums represent the proportion of the premiums that relate to periods of insurance after the balance sheet date and are calculated on a daily or 24th’s basis. Provision is made where necessary for the estimated amount required over and above unearned premiums to meet future claims and related expenses and is calculated by class of business on the basis of a separate carry forward of deferred acquisition expenses after making allowance for investment income. Acquisition expenses relating to new and renewed motor and household policies are deferred over the period during which the premiums are unearned, generally twelve months. The principal acquisition costs so deferred are direct advertising expenditure and costs associated with the telesales and underwriting staff. Claims are recognised in the accounting period in which the loss occurs. Provision is made for the full cost of settling outstanding claims at the balance sheet date, including claims estimated to have been incurred but not yet reported at that date, and claims handling expenses. |
| page 94 | Accounting policies continued |
| 8 | Long-term life assurance business The value placed on the Group’s long-term life assurance business comprises the net assets of the Group’s life assurance subsidiaries, including its interest in the surpluses retained within the long-term assurance funds, and the present value of profits inherent in in-force policies. In calculating the value of in-force policies, future surpluses expected to emerge are estimated using appropriate assumptions as to future mortality, persistency and levels of expenses, which are then discounted at a risk-adjusted rate. Changes in this value, which is determined on a post-tax basis, are included in operating profit, grossed up at the underlying rate of taxation. |
| Long-term assurance assets attributable to policyholders are valued on the following bases: equity shares and debt securities at market price; investment properties and loans at valuation. These assets are held in the life funds of the Group’s life assurance companies, and although legally owned by them, the Group only benefits from these assets when surpluses are declared. To reflect the distinct nature of the long-term assurance assets, they are shown separately on the consolidated balance sheet, as are liabilities attributable to policyholders. |
| 9 | Loans and advances The Group makes provisions for bad and doubtful debts, through charges to the profit and loss account, so as to record loans and advances at their expected ultimate net realisable value. |
| Specific provisions are made against individual loans and advances that the Group no longer expects to recover in full. For the Group’s portfolios of smaller balance homogeneous advances, such as credit card receivables, specific provisions are established on a portfolio basis taking into account the level of arrears, security and past loss experience. For loans and advances that are individually assessed, the specific provision is determined from a review of the financial condition of the counterparty and any guarantor and takes into account the nature and value of any security held. |
| The general provision is made to cover bad and doubtful debts that have not been separately identified at the balance sheet date but are known to be present in any portfolio of advances. The level of general provision is determined in the light of past experience, current economic and other factors affecting the business environment and the Group’s monitoring and control procedures, including the scope of specific provisioning procedures. |
| Specific and general provisions are deducted from loans and advances. When there is significant doubt that interest receivable can be collected, it is excluded from the profit and loss account and credited to an interest suspense account. Loans and advances and suspended interest are written off in part or in whole when there is no realistic prospect of recovery. |
| 10 | Taxation Provision is made for taxation at current enacted rates on taxable profits taking into account relief for overseas taxation where appropriate. Timing differences arise where gains and losses are accounted for in different periods for financial reporting purposes and for taxation purposes. Deferred taxation is accounted for in full for all such timing differences, except in relation to revaluations of fixed assets where there is no commitment to dispose of the asset, taxable gains on sales of fixed assets that are rolled over into the tax cost of replacement assets, and unremitted overseas earnings. Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is considered more likely than not that they will be recovered. Deferred tax amounts are not discounted. |
| 11 | Debt securities and equity shares Debt securities and equity shares intended for use on a continuing basis in the Group’s activities are classified as investment securities and are stated at cost less provision for any permanent diminution in value. The cost of dated investment securities is adjusted for the amortisation of premiums or discounts over periods to redemption and the amortisation is included in interest receivable. Debt securities held for the purpose of hedging are carried at a value that reflects the accounting treatment of the items hedged. Other debt securities and equity shares are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in the profit and loss account. |
| 12 | Shares in subsidiary undertakings The company’s shares in subsidiary undertakings are stated in the balance sheet of the company at directors’ valuation that takes account of the subsidiary undertakings’ net asset values. |
| 13 | Interests in associated undertakings Interests in associated undertakings are accounted for by the equity method and are stated in the consolidated balance sheet at the Group’s share of their net tangible assets. The Group’s share of the results of associated undertakings is included in the consolidated profit and loss account. For this purpose, the latest available audited accounts are used together with available unaudited interim accounts. |
| 14 | Tangible fixed assets Freehold and long leasehold properties are revalued on a rolling basis, each property being revalued at least every five years. Other tangible fixed assets are stated at cost less depreciation and provisions for impairment. Costs of adapting premises for the use of the Group are separately identified and depreciated. |
page 95
| Tangible fixed assets are depreciated over their estimated useful economic lives on a straight-line basis, as follows: |
|
Freehold and long leasehold buildings Short leaseholds Property adaptation costs Computer equipment Other equipment |
50 years unexpired period of the lease 10 to 15 years up to 5 years 4 to 15 years |
| Assets on operating leases are depreciated over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line or reverse-annuity basis. Land has an unlimited life and is not depreciated. |
| Investment properties are revalued annually to open market value. No depreciation is charged on freehold investment properties, in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 19 ‘Accounting for investment properties’. This is a departure from the requirements of the Companies Act 1985 which requires all tangible fixed assets to be depreciated. Investment properties are held not for consumption but for investment and the directors consider that to depreciate them would not give a true and fair view. It is not practicable to assess estimated useful lives for investment properties, and accordingly the effect of not depreciating them cannot be reasonably quantified. |
| 15 | Derivatives The Group enters into derivative transactions including futures, forwards, swaps and options principally in the interest rate, foreign exchange and equity markets. The accounting treatment for these instruments is dependent upon whether they are entered into for trading or non-trading (hedging) purposes. |
| Trading Derivatives held for trading purposes are recognised in the accounts at fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in fair value are included in dealing profits in the consolidated profit and loss account. Fair value is based on quoted market prices. Where representative market prices are not available, the fair value is determined from current market information using appropriate pricing or valuation models. Adjustments are made to quoted market prices where appropriate to cover credit risk, liquidity risk and future operational costs. In the consolidated balance sheet, positive fair values (assets) of trading derivatives are included in Other assets and negative fair values (liabilities) in Other liabilities. Positive and negative fair values of trading derivatives are offset where the contracts have been entered into under master netting agreements or other arrangements that give a legally enforceable right of set-off. |
| Non-trading Non-trading derivatives are entered into by the Group to hedge exposures arising from transactions entered into in the normal course of banking activities. They are recognised in the accounts in accordance with the accounting treatment of the underlying transaction or transactions being hedged. To be classified as non-trading, a derivative must match or eliminate the risk inherent in the hedged item from potential movements in interest rates, exchange rates or market values. In addition, there must be a demonstrable link to an underlying transaction, pool of transactions or specified future transaction or transactions. Specified future transactions must be reasonably certain to arise for the derivative to be accounted for as a hedge. In the event that a non-trading derivative transaction is terminated or ceases to be an effective hedge, the derivative is re-measured at fair value and any resulting profit or loss amortised over the remaining life of the underlying transaction or transactions being hedged. If a hedged item is derecognised, or a specified future transaction is no longer likely to occur, the related non-trading derivative is remeasured at fair value and the resulting profit or loss taken to the profit and loss account. |
| 16 | Sale and repurchase transactions Securities which have been sold with an agreement to repurchase continue to be shown on the balance sheet and the sale proceeds recorded as a deposit. Securities acquired in reverse sale and repurchase transactions are not recognised in the balance sheet and the purchase price is treated as a loan. The difference between the sale price and repurchase price is accrued evenly over the life of the transaction and charged or credited to the profit and loss account as interest payable or receivable. |
| Restatements The Group has implemented Financial Reporting Standard 19 ‘Deferred Tax’ (“FRS 19”) which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities on all timing differences, with specified exceptions. Previously, provision was made for deferred tax only to the extent that timing differences were expected to reverse and the deferred tax liability crystallise in the foreseeable future. The effect of adopting the new policy is to increase the tax charge for 2002 by £45 million and reduce profit and loss account reserves at 31 December 2002 by £162 million. Prior periods have been restated for FRS19 resulting in a decrease in profit and loss account reserves of £117 million at 31 December 2001 and 31 December 2000, an increase in the deferred tax liability of £194 million at 31 December 2001 and £182 million at 31 December 2000 and an increase in the deferred tax asset of £77 million at 31 December 2001 and £65 million at 31 December 2000. The tax charge for 2001 is unchanged and for 2000 increased by £21 million. |
| Following the issuance of Urgent Issues Task Force Abstract 33 ‘Obligations in capital instruments’ (“UITF 33”) in February 2002, the Group has reclassified its perpetual regulatory tier one securities, issued in August 2001, from non-equity shareholders’ funds to subordinated liabilities and the interest on these securities (£60 million in 2002) is now included in interest payable rather than non-equity dividends. Comparative figures have been restated resulting in an increase in interest payable of £23 million in the year ended 31 December 2001, a reduction in non-equity shareholders’ funds of £835 million, an increase in undated loan capital of £820 million and an increase in accruals and deferred income of £15 million as at 31 December 2001. |
| page 96 | Consolidated
profit and loss account for the year ended 31 December 2002 |
| Note | 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
||||||
| |
|||||||||
| Interest receivable | |||||||||
| – interest receivable and similar income arising from debt securities | 1,591 | 1,582 | 1,460 | ||||||
| – other interest receivable and similar income | 11,970 | 12,839 | 11,758 | ||||||
| Interest payable | (5,712 | ) | (7,575 | ) | (7,932 | ) | |||
| |
|||||||||
| Net interest income | 7,849 | 6,846 | 5,286 | ||||||
| |
|||||||||
| Dividend income | 58 | 54 | 44 | ||||||
| Fees and commissions receivable | 5,308 | 4,735 | 3,614 | ||||||
| Fees and commissions payable | (965 | ) | (930 | ) | (706 | ) | |||
| Dealing profits | 1 | 1,462 | 1,426 | 933 | |||||
| Other operating income | 1,209 | 1,052 | 874 | ||||||
| |
|||||||||
| 7,072 | 6,337 | 4,759 | |||||||
| General insurance | |||||||||
| – earned premiums | 2,383 | 1,804 | 1,344 | ||||||
| – reinsurance | (489 | ) | (429 | ) | (394 | ) | |||
| |
|||||||||
| Non-interest income | 8,966 | 7,712 | 5,709 | ||||||
| |
|||||||||
| Total income | 16,815 | 14,558 | 10,995 | ||||||
| |
|||||||||
| Administrative expenses | |||||||||
| – staff costs** | 2 | 4,472 | 4,059 | 3,274 | |||||
| – premises and equipment** | 1,006 | 873 | 753 | ||||||
| – other** | 2,253 | 1,903 | 1,475 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | |||||||||
| – tangible fixed assets** | 21 | 895 | 881 | 721 | |||||
| – goodwill | 20 | 731 | 651 | 537 | |||||
| |
|||||||||
| Operating expenses | 9,357 | 8,367 | 6,760 | ||||||
| |
|||||||||
| Profit before other operating charges | 7,458 | 6,191 | 4,235 | ||||||
| General insurance | |||||||||
| – gross claims | 1,693 | 1,263 | 981 | ||||||
| – reinsurance | (343 | ) | (315 | ) | (308 | ) | |||
| |
|||||||||
| Profit before provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 6,108 | 5,243 | 3,562 | ||||||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 13 | 1,286 | 984 | 550 | |||||
| Amounts written off fixed asset investments | 59 | 7 | 42 | ||||||
| |
|||||||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax (carried forward) | 4 | 4,763 | 4,252 | 2,970 | |||||
| |
|||||||||
| * | restated (see page 95) |
| ** | includes integration expenditure (see Note 4) |
page 97
| Note | 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
||||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax (brought forward) | 4 | 4,763 | 4,252 | 2,970 | |||||
| Tax on profit on ordinary activities | 5 | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | |||||
| Profit on ordinary activities after tax | 3,207 | 2,715 | 1,916 | ||||||
| Minority interests (including non-equity) | 32 | 133 | 90 | 50 | |||||
| Profit for the financial year | 3,074 | 2,625 | 1,866 | ||||||
| Preference dividends – non-equity | 6 | 305 | 358 | 294 | |||||
| 2,769 | 2,267 | 1,572 | |||||||
| Additional Value Shares dividend – non-equity | 6 | 798 | 399 | - | |||||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | ||||||
| Ordinary dividends | 7 | 1,267 | 1,085 | 882 | |||||
| Retained profit | 34 | 704 | 783 | 690 | |||||
| Per 25p ordinary share: | |||||||||
| Basic earnings | 9 | 68.4p | 67.6p | 66.9p | |||||
| Additional Value Shares dividend | 27.7p | 14.5p | - | ||||||
| 96.1p | 82.1p | 66.9p | |||||||
| Goodwill amortisation | 24.2p | 23.2p | 22.4p | ||||||
| Integration costs | 23.8p | 22.6p | 11.9p | ||||||
| Adjusted earnings | 144.1p | 127.9p | 101.2p | ||||||
| Diluted earnings | 9 | 67.4p | 66.3p | 66.2p | |||||
| Dividends | 7 | 43.7p | 38.0p | 33.0p | |||||
| All items dealt with in arriving at profit on ordinary activities before tax relate to continuing operations. |
| Profit on ordinary activities before taxation and the retained profit for the year on a historical cost basis were not materially different from the reported amounts. |
| * | restated (see page 95) |
| page 98 | Consolidated
balance sheet at 31 December 2002 |
| Note | 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
||
| Assets | ||||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 3,481 | 3,093 | ||
| Items in the course of collection from other banks | 2,741 | 3,288 | ||
| Treasury bills and other eligible bills | 10 | 11,459 | 10,136 | |
| Loans and advances to banks | 11 | 44,296 | 38,513 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 12 | 223,324 | 190,492 | |
| Debt securities | 15 | 67,042 | 64,040 | |
| Equity shares | 16 | 1,886 | 1,557 | |
| Interests in associated undertakings | 17 | 94 | 108 | |
| Intangible fixed assets | 20 | 12,697 | 13,325 | |
| Tangible fixed assets | 21 | 10,485 | 8,813 | |
| Other assets | 22 | 21,031 | 21,550 | |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 4,353 | 3,696 | ||
| 402,889 | 358,611 | |||
| Long-term assurance assets attributable to policyholders | 23 | 9,111 | 10,248 | |
| Total assets | 412,000 | 368,859 | ||
| * | restated (see page 95) |
page 99
| Note | 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
||
| Liabilities | ||||
| Deposits by banks | 24 | 54,720 | 40,038 | |
| Items in the course of transmission to other banks | 1,258 | 2,109 | ||
| Customer accounts | 25 | 219,161 | 198,995 | |
| Debt securities in issue | 26 | 33,938 | 30,669 | |
| Other liabilities | 27 | 40,166 | 37,357 | |
| Accruals and deferred income | 8,626 | 7,669 | ||
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | ||||
| – deferred taxation | 28 | 1,834 | 1,650 | |
| – other provisions | 29 | 330 | 341 | |
| Subordinated liabilities | ||||
| – dated loan capital | 30 | 7,602 | 6,681 | |
| – undated loan capital including convertible debt | 31 | 6,363 | 5,849 | |
| Minority interests | ||||
| – equity | (11) | 5 | ||
| – non-equity | 32 | 1,850 | 580 | |
| Called up share capital | 33 | 754 | 893 | |
| Share premium account | 34 | 7,608 | 7,465 | |
| Merger reserve | 34 | 11,455 | 12,029 | |
| Other reserves | 34 | 387 | 212 | |
| Revaluation reserve | 34 | 80 | 113 | |
| Profit and loss account | 34 | 6,768 | 5,956 | |
| Shareholders’ funds | ||||
| – equity | 23,545 | 22,287 | ||
| – non-equity | 34 | 3,507 | 4,381 | |
| 402,889 | 358,611 | |||
| Long-term assurance liabilities attributable to policyholders | 23 | 9,111 | 10,248 | |
| Total liabilities | 412,000 | 368,859 | ||
| Memorandum items | ||||
| Contingent liabilities | 41 | 15,588 | 13,573 | |
| Commitments (standby facilities, credit lines and other) | 41 | 128,592 | 125,271 | |
| * | restated (see page 95) |
| The accounts were approved by the Board of directors on 26 February 2003 and signed on its behalf by: |
| Sir George Mathewson Chairman |
Fred Goodwin Group Chief Executive |
Fred Watt Group Finance Director |
| page 100 | Statement
of consolidated total recognised gains and losses for the year ended 31 December 2002 |
| 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
|||||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | ||||
| Currency translation adjustments and other movements | 36 | (3 | ) | 52 | |||
| Revaluation of premises | (33 | ) | 72 | 24 | |||
| Total recognised gains and losses in the year | 1,974 | 1,937 | 1,648 | ||||
| Prior year adjustment arising from the implementation of FRS 19 | (117 | ) | |||||
| Total recognised gains and losses since 31 December 2001 | 1,857 | ||||||
| Reconciliation
of movements in consolidated shareholders' funds for the year ended 31 December 2002 |
| 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2000* £m |
|||||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | ||||
| Ordinary dividends | (1,267 | ) | (1,085 | ) | (882 | ) | |
| Retained profit for the year | 704 | 783 | 690 | ||||
| Issue of ordinary and preference shares | 560 | 2,759 | 18,030 | ||||
| Perpetual regulatory securities | - | 835 | - | ||||
| Redemption of preference shares | (600 | ) | - | (300 | ) | ||
| Other recognised gains and losses | 3 | 69 | 76 | ||||
| Currency translation adjustments on share premium account | (283 | ) | 58 | 159 | |||
| Other movements | - | - | (17 | ) | |||
| Net increase in shareholders’ funds | 384 | 4,504 | 18,638 | ||||
| Perpetual regulatory securities | - | (835 | ) | - | |||
| Net increase in shareholders’ funds as restated | 384 | 3,669 | 18,638 | ||||
| Opening shareholders’ funds as previously reported | 27,620 | 23,116 | 4,457 | ||||
| Prior year adjustments arising from the implementation of: | |||||||
| – FRS 19 | (117 | ) | (117 | ) | (96 | ) | |
| – UITF 33 | (835 | ) | - | - | |||
| Opening shareholders’ funds as restated | 26,668 | 22,999 | 4,361 | ||||
| Net increase in shareholders’ funds as restated | 384 | 3,669 | 18,638 | ||||
| Closing shareholders’ funds | 27,052 | 26,668 | 22,999 | ||||
| * | restated (see page 95) |
page 101
| Consolidated
cash flow statement for the year ended 31 December 2002 |
| Note | 2002 £m |
2002 £m |
2001* £m |
2001* £m |
2000 £m |
2000 £m |
||||||||
| Net
cash inflow from operating activities |
43 | 13,737 | 7,287 | 8,997 | ||||||||||
| Dividends
received from associated undertakings |
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Returns
on investments and servicing of finance |
||||||||||||||
| Preference dividends paid | (317 | ) | (353 | ) | (228 | ) | ||||||||
| Additional Value Shares dividend paid | (798 | ) | (399 | ) | - | |||||||||
| Dividends
paid to minority shareholders in subsidiary undertakings |
(112 | ) | (43 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest paid on subordinated liabilities | (674 | ) | (652 | ) | (739 | ) | ||||||||
| Net
cash outflow from returns on investments and servicing of finance |
(1,901 | ) | (1,447 | ) | (1,005 | ) | ||||||||
| Taxation | ||||||||||||||
| UK tax paid | (833 | ) | (790 | ) | (493 | ) | ||||||||
| Overseas tax paid | (274 | ) | (419 | ) | (212 | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash outflow from taxation | (1,107 | ) | (1,209 | ) | (705 | ) | ||||||||
| Capital
expenditure and financial investment |
||||||||||||||
| Purchase of investment securities | (32,701 | ) | (27,537 | ) | (16,249 | ) | ||||||||
| Sale
and maturity of investment securities |
26,072 | 20,578 | 11,864 | |||||||||||
| Purchase of tangible fixed assets | (3,367 | ) | (4,245 | ) | (1,189 | ) | ||||||||
| Sale of tangible fixed assets | 811 | 867 | 455 | |||||||||||
| Net
cash outflow from capital expenditure and financial investment |
(9,185 | ) | (10,337 | ) | (5,119 | ) | ||||||||
| Acquisitions and disposals | ||||||||||||||
| Purchase
of businesses and subsidiary undertakings (net of cash acquired) |
44 | (308 | ) | (1,614 | ) | (2,931 | ) | |||||||
| Investment in associated undertakings | 17 | (2 | ) | (47 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||
| Sale
of subsidiary and associated undertakings (net of cash sold) |
45 | 29 | 8 | 1,158 | ||||||||||
| Net
cash outflow from acquisitions disposals |
(281 | ) | (1,653 | ) | (1,779 | ) | ||||||||
| Ordinary equity dividends paid | (729 | ) | (653 | ) | (386 | ) | ||||||||
| Net
cash inflow/(outflow) before financing |
535 | (8,011 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||
| Financing | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds
from issue of ordinary share capital |
85 | 2,131 | 2,171 | |||||||||||
| Proceeds
from issue of preference share capital |
- | 281 | 2,510 | |||||||||||
| Proceeds
from issue of trust preferred securities |
1,242 | - | - | |||||||||||
| Redemption
of preference share capital |
(600 | ) | - | (300 | ) | |||||||||
| Issue of subordinated liabilities | 2,157 | 2,705 | 294 | |||||||||||
| Repayment of subordinated liabilities | (202 | ) | (693 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||||||
| Increase/(decrease)
in minority interests |
29 | (13 | ) | 75 | ||||||||||
| Net cash inflow from financing | 2,711 | 4,411 | 4,604 | |||||||||||
| Increase/(decrease) in cash | 48 | 3,246 | (3,600 | ) | 4,609 | |||||||||
| * | restated (see page 95) |
| page 102 | Balance
sheet - the company at 31 December 2002 |
| Note | 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
||||
| Fixed assets | ||||||
| Investments: | ||||||
| Shares in Group undertakings | 18 | 19,862 | 18,306 | |||
| Loans to Group undertakings | 19 | 3,354 | 2,161 | |||
| 23,216 | 20,467 | |||||
| Current assets | ||||||
| Debtors: | ||||||
| Due by subsidiary undertakings | 958 | 2,063 | ||||
| Debtors and prepayments | 113 | 38 | ||||
| 1,071 | 2,101 | |||||
| Creditors | ||||||
| Amounts falling due within one year: | ||||||
| Due to banks | 71 | 79 | ||||
| Dated loan capital | 30 | 40 | 40 | |||
| Debt securities in issue | 1,199 | 1,555 | ||||
| Other creditors | 154 | 187 | ||||
| Proposed final dividend | 7 | 899 | 772 | |||
| 2,363 | 2,633 | |||||
| Net current liabilities | (1,292 | ) | (532 | ) | ||
| Total assets less current liabilities | 21,924 | 19,935 | ||||
| Creditors | ||||||
| Amounts falling due beyond one year: | ||||||
| Loans from subsidiary undertakings | 155 | 491 | ||||
| Dated loan capital | 30 | 2,402 | 598 | |||
| Undated loan capital including convertible debt | 31 | 1,301 | 1,445 | |||
| 3,858 | 2,534 | |||||
| Capital and reserves | ||||||
| Called up share capital | 33 | 754 | 893 | |||
| Share premium account | 34 | 7,608 | 7,465 | |||
| Other reserves | 34 | 156 | 6 | |||
| Revaluation reserve | 34 | 6,001 | 4,607 | |||
| Profit and loss account | 34 | 3,547 | 4,430 | |||
| Shareholders’ funds | ||||||
| – equity | 14,559 | 13,020 | ||||
| – non-equity | 34 | 3,507 | 4,381 | |||
| 21,924 | 19,935 | |||||
| * | restated (see page 95) |
| The accounts were approved by the Board of directors on 26 February 2003 and signed on its behalf by: |
| Sir George Mathewson Chairman |
Fred Goodwin Group Chief Executive |
Fred Watt Group Finance Director |
page 103
| Notes on the accounts |
| 1 | Dealing profits |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Foreign exchange (1) | 447 | 450 | 368 | |
| Securities | ||||
| Equities (2) | 18 | 10 | 56 | |
| Debt (3) | 644 | 682 | 336 | |
| Interest rate derivatives (4) | 353 | 284 | 173 | |
| 1,462 | 1,426 | 933 | ||
| Dealing profits include interest income and expense recognised on trading-related interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. |
(1) |
Notes: Includes spot and forward foreign exchange contracts and currency swaps, futures and options and related hedges and funding. |
| (2) | Includes equities, equity derivatives, commodity contracts and related hedges and funding. |
| (3) | Includes debt securities and related hedges and funding. |
| (4) | Includes interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements, interest rate options, interest rate futures and credit derivatives and related hedges and funding. |
| 2 | Administrative expenses - staff costs |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Wages and salaries | 3,453 | 3,006 | 2,508 | |
| Social security costs | 239 | 212 | 182 | |
| Pension costs (see Note 3) | 232 | 180 | 128 | |
| Other staff costs | 548 | 661 | 456 | |
| 4,472 | 4,059 | 3,274 | ||
| The average number of persons employed by the Group during the year, excluding temporary staff, was 113,500 (2001 – 99,400; 2000 – 91,800). |
| 3 | Pension
costs The Group operates a number of pension schemes throughout the world. The main schemes are defined benefit schemes whose assets are independent of the Group’s finances. The total pension cost for the Group was as follows: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Main UK scheme | 187 | 150 | 107 | |
| Other Group schemes | 45 | 30 | 21 | |
| 232 | 180 | 128 | ||
| At 31 December 2002, there was a pension cost prepayment of £136 million and accrual of £17 million (2001 – prepayment of £115 million and accrual of £33 million; 2000 – prepayment of £90 million and accrual of £14 million). |
| On the acquisition of NatWest in March 2000, a surplus of £1,070 million on its major schemes was recognised in the consolidated balance sheet, and is being amortised over the average future service life of members of the schemes. The unamortised balance as at 31 December 2002 was £838 million (2001 – £920 million) before tax and £587 million (2001 – £644 million) after tax. The unamortised balance before tax is included in ‘Other assets’. |
| The Group’s two main UK pension schemes, The Royal Bank of Scotland Staff Pension Scheme and the National Westminster Bank Pension Fund, merged on 1 April 2002 to form The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Pension Fund. Scheme valuations are carried out by independent professionally qualified actuaries to determine pension costs, using the projected unit method; any imbalance between assets and liabilities is adjusted over the average future service life of members of the scheme. The assumptions that have the most significant effect on the results of the valuations are those relating to the valuation rate of interest and the rates of increases in salaries and pensions. |
| page 104 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 3 | Pension
costs (continued) The latest formal valuation of The Royal Bank of Scotland Staff Pension Scheme and the National Westminster Bank Pension Fund was carried out as at 31 March 2001 on a basis that assumed the merger of the schemes. The results of this valuation and the principal actuarial assumptions were: |
| Market value of scheme assets (£m) | 13,027 | ||
| Funding level | 108 | % | |
| Excess of scheme assets over schemes liabilities (£m) | 1,058 | ||
| Valuation
rate of interest past service liabilities (per annum) – pensioners |
5.5 | % | |
| past service liabilities (per annum) – non-pensioners | 6.0 | % | |
| future service liabilities (per annum) | 6.75 | % | |
| Salary growth (per annum) (1) | 4.25 | % | |
| Pension increases (per annum) | 2.5 | % | |
| Price inflation (per annum) | 2.5 | % | |
(1) |
Notes: In addition, allowance is made for promotional salary increases. |
| (2) | Assumptions for rate of dividend increases are not relevant to the bases of valuations adopted. |
| The pension costs relating to the merged schemes were: |
| Pension costs for the year | 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|||
| Regular cost | 263 | 206 | |||
| Amortisation of pension fund surplus | (153 | ) | (147 | ) | |
| Prior year service costs | - | 14 | |||
| Amortisation of surplus recognised on acquisition of NatWest | 77 | 77 | |||
| Net pension cost | 187 | 150 | |||
| In addition to the main scheme, the Group operates a number of other UK and overseas pension schemes and also provides other post-retirement benefits, principally through subscriptions to private healthcare schemes in the UK and the US and unfunded post-retirement benefit plans. Provision for the costs of these benefits is charged to the profit and loss account over the average remaining future service lives of the eligible employees. The amounts are not material. |
| In accordance with SSAP 24, the pension costs relating to the main scheme are based on the actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2001. Since that date, stock market equity values and bond yields have declined. The next triennial valuation will be carried out as at 31 March 2004 and will form the basis of pension costs under SSAP 24 from that date. |
| FRS 17 In accordance with the transitional requirements of FRS 17 interim valuations of the Group’s schemes were prepared to 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2001 by independent actuaries, using the following assumptions: |
| 2002
|
2001
|
||||||||
| Main
UK scheme |
Other
Group schemes* |
Main
UK scheme |
Other
Group schemes* |
||||||
| Rate of increase in salaries (per annum) | 3.50 | % | 3.2 | % | 4.25 | % | 3.2 | % | |
| Rate of increase in pensions in payment (per annum) | 2.25 | % | 1.7 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.3 | % | |
| Discount rate (per annum) | 5.75 | % | 5.8 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.1 | % | |
| Inflation assumption (per annum) | 2.25 | % | 1.7 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.2 | % | |
| * | weighted average |
page 105
| The values of the assets and liabilities of the schemes at 31 December 2002 and 2001 and the effect on the Group’s reserves if they were to be incorporated in the balance sheet were as follows: |
| 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
| Main
UK scheme £m |
Other
Group schemes £m |
Main
UK scheme £m |
Other
Group schemes £m |
||||||
| Equities | 7,161 | 610 | 7,899 | 717 | |||||
| Bonds | 3,298 | 260 | 4,203 | 176 | |||||
| Other | 223 | 140 | 465 | 167 | |||||
| Total market value of assets | 10,682 | 1,010 | 12,567 | 1,060 | |||||
| Present value of scheme liabilities | (12,418 | ) | (1,130 | ) | (12,121 | ) | (1,014 | ) | |
| Net (deficit)/surplus in the schemes | (1,736 | ) | (120 | ) | 446 | 46 | |||
| Related notional deferred tax asset/(liability) | 521 | 20 | (133 | ) | (10 | ) | |||
| Net unrecognised pension (deficit)/surplus | (1,215 | ) | (100 | ) | 313 | 36 | |||
| Prepayments
less accruals currently recognised, net of deferred tax |
(52 | ) | (27 | ) | (53 | ) | (5 | ) | |
| Pension
assets recognised on the acquisition of NatWest, net of deferred tax and amortisation |
(548 | ) | (39 | ) | (602 | ) | (42 | ) | |
| Effect on Group profit and loss account reserves | (1,815 | ) | (166 | ) | (342 | ) | (11 | ) | |
| The assumptions for long-term rates of return on the principal classes of assets at 31 December 2002 were equities 8.4%, gilts 4.5%, other bonds 5.75%, property 6.5% and cash 4.5% (2001 – equities 8.4%, gilts 5.0%, other bonds 6.0%, property 6.8% and cash 4.5%). |
| The following amounts would be reflected in the profit and loss account and statement of total recognised gains and losses on implementation of FRS 17: |
| Amount that would be charged to profit and loss account | Main
UK scheme £m |
Other schemes £m |
2002 Total £m |
||||
| Expected return on pension scheme assets | 900 | 88 | 988 | ||||
| Interest on pension scheme liabilities | (719 | ) | (68 | ) | (787 | ) | |
| Net return credited to other finance income | 181 | 20 | 201 | ||||
| Current service cost | (287 | ) | (35 | ) | (322 | ) | |
| Past service cost | - | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||
| Net pension cost defined benefit schemes | (106 | ) | (18 | ) | (124 | ) | |
| Defined contribution schemes and other retirement benefits | - | (19 | ) | (19 | ) | ||
| Total pension costs | (106 | ) | (37 | ) | (143 | ) | |
| Amount that would be recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses | 2002 Total £m |
||
| Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets | (2,645 | ) | |
| Experience gains and losses arising on scheme liabilities | (25 | ) | |
| Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of scheme liabilities | 278 | ||
| Actuarial loss | (2,392 | ) | |
| Movement in pension scheme (deficits)/surpluses during the year | 2002 Total £m |
||
| Surplus in the pension schemes at 1 January 2002 | 492 | ||
| Movement in year: | |||
| Current service cost | (322 | ) | |
| Past service cost | (3 | ) | |
| Contributions | 167 | ||
| Other finance income | 201 | ||
| Actuarial loss | (2,392 | ) | |
| Exchange and other movements | 1 | ||
| Deficit in schemes at 31 December 2002 | (1,856 | ) | |
| The contribution rate for 2002 and 2003 for the main scheme is 6.8% of pensionable salaries. |
| page 106 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 3 | Pension costs (continued) |
| History of experience gains and losses | 2002 £m |
||
| Difference between expected and actual return on scheme assets: | |||
| Amount | (2,645 | ) | |
| Percentage of scheme assets | (22.6% | ) | |
| Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities: | |||
| Amount | (25 | ) | |
| Percentage of the present value of scheme liabilities | (0.2% | ) | |
| Total amount recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses: | |||
| Amount | (2,392 | ) | |
| Percentage of the present value of scheme liabilities | (17.7% | ) | |
| 4 | Profit
on ordinary activities before tax Profit on ordinary activities before tax is stated after taking account of the following: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||||
| Income | Aggregate amounts receivable under finance leases, | |||||
| hire purchase and conditional sale contracts | 1,342 | 1,575 | 1,383 | |||
| Aggregate amounts receivable under operating leases | 811 | 707 | 639 | |||
| Profit on disposal of investment securities | 85 | 48 | 326 | |||
| Share of associated undertakings’ net profit/(loss) | 2 | (6 | ) | - | ||
| Expenses | Operating lease rentals of premises | 255 | 214 | 223 | ||
| Operating lease rentals of computers and other equipment | 16 | 18 | 9 | |||
| Finance charges on leased assets | 23 | 40 | 36 | |||
| Interest on subordinated liabilities | 659 | 674 | 687 | |||
| Integration expenditure* relating to: | ||||||
| – acquisition of NatWest | 810 | 847 | 345 | |||
| – other acquisitions | 147 | 28 | 44 | |||
| * | Integrationexpenditure comprises: | |||||
| Staff costs | 530 | 598 | 255 | |||
| Premises and equipment | 127 | 64 | 27 | |||
| Other administrative expenses | 298 | 188 | 95 | |||
| Depreciation | 2 | 25 | 12 | |||
| 957 | 875 | 389 | ||||
| Auditors'
remuneration The auditors’ remuneration for statutory audit work was £0.1 million for the company (2001 – £0.1 million) and £5.8 million for the Group (2001 – £5.4 million). Fees paid to the auditors and their associates for non-audit work were £6.3 million for the Group (2001 – £7.0 million) and comprised £0.8 million for management consultancy services (2001 – £2.3 million) and £5.5 million for regulatory, tax, attestation and other advisory services (2001 – £4.7 million). |
page 107
| 5 | Tax on profit on ordinary activities |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Current taxation: | |||||||
| UK corporation tax charge for the year at 30% (2001 and 2000 - 30%) | 909 | 984 | 696 | ||||
| Over provision in respect of prior periods | (13 | ) | (16 | ) | (79 | ) | |
| Relief for overseas taxation | (26 | ) | (98 | ) | (30 | ) | |
| 870 | 870 | 587 | |||||
| Overseas taxation: | |||||||
| Current year charge | 370 | 381 | 161 | ||||
| (Over)/under provision in respect of prior periods | (2 | ) | 31 | - | |||
| 1,238 | 1,282 | 748 | |||||
| Share of associated undertakings | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Current tax charge for the year | 1,240 | 1,284 | 750 | ||||
| Deferred taxation: | |||||||
| Origination and reversal of timing differences | 372 | 255 | 225 | ||||
| (Over)/under provision in respect of prior periods | (56 | ) | (2 | ) | 79 | ||
| 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | |||||
| The actual tax charge differs from the expected tax charge computed by applying the standard rate of UK corporation tax of 30% as follows: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Expected tax charge | 1,429 | 1,276 | 891 | ||||
| Goodwill amortisation | 183 | 169 | 162 | ||||
| Contributions to employee share trust | (40 | ) | (48 | ) | (47 | ) | |
| Non-deductible items | 179 | 251 | 197 | ||||
| Non-taxable items | (163 | ) | (92 | ) | (217 | ) | |
| Capital allowances in excess of depreciation | (340 | ) | (280 | ) | (143 | ) | |
| Taxable foreign exchange movements | 4 | 16 | 21 | ||||
| Foreign profits taxed at other rates | 3 | (13 | ) | (17 | ) | ||
| Unutilised losses brought forward and carried forward | - | (10 | ) | (18 | ) | ||
| Current taxation adjustments relating to prior periods | (15 | ) | 15 | (79 | ) | ||
| Current tax charge for year | 1,240 | 1,284 | 750 | ||||
| Deferred taxation: | |||||||
| Origination and reversal of timing differences | 372 | 255 | 225 | ||||
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (56 | ) | (2 | ) | 79 | ||
| Actual tax charge | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | ||||
| The following factors may affect future tax charges: |
| (1) | No deferred tax is recognised on the unremitted reserves of overseas subsidiary and associated undertakings. A substantial proportion of such reserves are required to be retained by the overseas undertakings to meet local regulatory requirements. |
| (2) | Deferred tax assets of £107 million (2001 - £96 million) resulting from tax losses carried forward have not been recognised as there is insufficient evidence that the asset will be recoverable. These assets may be recoverable if the losses can be offset against suitable future taxable profits arising in the same tax jurisdiction. |
| (3) | The fair values of certain financial assets are disclosed in Note 40. The tax that could be payable if these assets were disposed of at the values shown is estimated at £965 million (2001 – £231 million). Because of the nature of these financial assets which are held as part of the banking business, it is not possible to determine the amount that may become payable in the foreseeable future. |
| (4) | Freehold and long leasehold properties are revalued as discussed in Note 21. No provision has been made for deferred tax on gains recognised on revaluing Group properties except where there is a commitment to sell the asset and the taxable gain will not be subject to rollover relief. The tax that could be payable if these assets were disposed of at their revalued amount is estimated at £81 million (2001 – £119 million). This amount includes tax on rolled over gains (see note (5) below). No such tax is expected to be payable in the foreseeable future. |
| (5) | No provision has been made for deferred tax on certain gains realised on disposals of property and other assets as there is an expectation of rolling over such gains into replacement assets. Expenditure to date on valid replacement assets together with forecasts of future such expenditure indicate that these gains will be available for rollover relief. The tax that could be payable if the conditions for rollover relief were not met is estimated at £93 million (2001 – £88 million). |
| page 108 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 6 | Preference and Additional Value Shares dividends |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 | 141 | 140 | 121 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of US$0.01 | 108 | 115 | 76 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of €0.01 | 32 | 32 | 25 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.25 | 1 | 49 | 66 | |
| Non-cumulative preference shares of £0.01 | 15 | 15 | 1 | |
| 11% cumulative preference shares of £1 (1) | - | - | - | |
| 5.5% cumulative preference shares of £1 (2) | - | - | - | |
| Appropriation for premium payable on redemption and issue costs | 8 | 7 | 5 | |
| Total preference dividends | 305 | 358 | 294 | |
| Additional Value Shares | 798 | 399 | - | |
| Total non-equity dividends | 1,103 | 757 | 294 | |
(1) |
Notes: Dividends for the year ended 31 December 2002 amounted to £55,000 (2001 and 2000 - £55,000). |
| (2) | Dividends for the year ended 31 December 2002 amounted to £22,000 (2001 and 2000 - £22,000). |
| 7 | Ordinary dividends |
| 2002 p per share |
2001 p per share |
2000 p per share |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Interim | 12.7 | 11.0 | 9.5 | 368 | 313 | 253 | |
| Proposed final | 31.0 | 27.0 | 23.5 | 899 | 772 | 629 | |
| Total dividends on equity shares | 43.7 | 38.0 | 33.0 | 1,267 | 1,085 | 882 | |
| 8 | Profit
dealt with in the accounts of the company Of the profit attributable to shareholders, £1,955 million (2001 – £1,033 million; 2000 – £4,688 million) has been dealt with in the accounts of the company. |
| 9 | Earnings
per ordinary share The earnings per share are based on the following: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Earnings: | ||||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | |
| Number of shares – millions | ||||
| Number of ordinary shares: | ||||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year | 2,881 | 2,762 | 2,348 | |
| Effect of dilutive share options and convertible non-equity shares | 43 | 55 | 28 | |
| Diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares during the year | 2,924 | 2,817 | 2,376 | |
page 109
10
| |
Treasury bills and other eligible bills |
|
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||
| Treasury bills and similar securities | 8,348 | 6,324 | |||
| Other eligible bills | 3,111 | 3,812 | |||
| 11,459 | 10,136 | ||||
| Banking business | 4,569 | 1,937 | |||
| Trading business | 6,890 | 8,199 | |||
| Treasury and other eligible bills are principally of short-term maturity and their market value is not materially different from carrying value. |
| 11 | Loans and advances to banks |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||
| Repayable on demand | 6,792 | 3,934 | |||
| Remaining maturity | |||||
| – three months or less | 28,537 | 26,200 | |||
| – one year or less but over three months | 8,482 | 7,884 | |||
| – five years or less but over one year | 180 | 260 | |||
| – over five years | 312 | 243 | |||
| 44,303 | 38,521 | ||||
| Specific bad and doubtful debt provisions | (7 | ) | (8 | ) | |
| 44,296 | 38,513 | ||||
| Banking business | 21,859 | 21,679 | |||
| Trading business | 22,437 | 16,834 | |||
| Amounts above include: | |||||
| Due from associated undertakings – unsubordinated | - | 3 | |||
| page 110 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 12 | Loans and advances to customers |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| On demand or short notice | 21,122 | 17,434 | |||||
| Remaining maturity | |||||||
| - three months or less | 65,108 | 33,774 | |||||
| - one year or less but over three months | 24,750 | 25,279 | |||||
| - five years or less but over one year | 40,364 | 46,054 | |||||
| - over five years | 75,900 | 71,596 | |||||
| 227,244 | 194,137 | ||||||
| General and specific bad and doubtful debt provisions | (3,920 | ) | (3,645 | ) | |||
| 223,324 | 190,492 | ||||||
| Banking business | 197,818 | 178,476 | |||||
| Trading business | 25,506 | 12,016 | |||||
| Amounts above include: | |||||||
| Subordinated advances | 96 | 52 | |||||
| Due from associated undertakings - unsubordinated | 289 | 164 | |||||
| Amounts receivable under finance leases | 7,496 | 7,315 | |||||
| Amounts receivable under hire purchase and conditional sale agreements | 4,231 | 3,678 | |||||
| The cost of assets acquired during the year for the purpose of letting under finance leases and hire purchase agreements was £4,684 million (2001 – £4,082 million). |
| The Group’s exposure to risk from its lending activities is widely diversified both geographically and industrially. Lending to the services sector, house mortgage lending, loans to financial institutions, other personal loans and lending to property companies exceeded 10% of total loans and advances to customers (before provisions). |
| Residual value exposures The table below gives details of the unguaranteed residual values included in the carrying value of finance lease receivables (see above) and operating lease assets (see Note 21). |
| Year
in which the residual value will be recovered
|
|||||||||||||
| Within 1 year £m |
After
1 year but within 2 years £m |
After
2 years but within 5 years £m |
After 5 years £m |
Total £m |
|||||||||
| Operating leases | |||||||||||||
| Transportation | 59 | 467 | 204 | 1,480 | 2,210 | ||||||||
| Cars and light commercial vehicles | 328 | 134 | 110 | - | 572 | ||||||||
| Other | 22 | 12 | 60 | 147 | 241 | ||||||||
| Finance leases | 43 | 71 | 83 | 352 | 549 | ||||||||
| At 31 December 2002 | 452 | 684 | 457 | 1,979 | 3,572 | ||||||||
| At 31 December 2001 | 315 | 205 | 741 | 992 | 2,253 | ||||||||
page 111
| 13 | Provisions for bad and doubtful debts |
| Specific £m |
General £m |
2002 Total £m |
Specific £m |
General £m |
2001 Total £m |
||||||||||
| At 1 January | 3,039 | 614 | 3,653 | 2,585 | 568 | 3,153 | |||||||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (45 | ) | (17 | ) | (62 | ) | 14 | 3 | 17 | ||||||
| Acquisition of businesses | 23 | - | 23 | 221 | 33 | 254 | |||||||||
| Amounts written off | (1,036 | ) | - | (1,036 | ) | (835 | ) | - | (835 | ) | |||||
| Recoveries of amounts written off in previous periods | 63 | - | 63 | 80 | - | 80 | |||||||||
| Charge to profit and loss account | 1,286 | - | 1,286 | 974 | 10 | 984 | |||||||||
| At 31 December | 3,330 | 597 | 3,927 | 3,039 | 614 | 3,653 | |||||||||
| 14 |
Interest in suspense In certain cases, interest may be charged to a customer’s account but, because its recoverability is in doubt, not recognised in the Group’s consolidated profit and loss account and held in a suspense account and netted off against loans and advances in the consolidated balance sheet. |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Loans and advances on which interest is being placed in suspense: | |||||||
| - before specific provisions | 1,660 | 1,550 | |||||
| - after specific provisions | 724 | 816 | |||||
| Loans and advances on which interest is not being applied: | |||||||
| - before specific provisions | 2,515 | 2,386 | |||||
| - after specific provisions | 1,082 | 828 | |||||
| page 112 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 15 | Debt securities |
| 2002 Book value £m |
Gross unrecognised gains £m |
Gross unrecognised losses £m |
2002 Valuation £m |
2001 Book value £m |
Gross unrecognised gains £m |
Gross unrecognised losses £m |
2001 Valuation £m |
||||||||||
| Investment securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| British government | 197 | 3 | - | 200 | 376 | 1 | (1 | ) | 376 | ||||||||
| Other government | 11,994 | 297 | (2 | ) | 12,289 | 10,083 | 86 | (97 | ) | 10,072 | |||||||
| Other public sector bodies | 708 | 6 | - | 714 | 673 | 24 | - | 697 | |||||||||
| Bank and building society | 8,996 | 7 | (2 | ) | 9,001 | 7,344 | 254 | (234 | ) | 7,364 | |||||||
| Other issuers | 16,296 | 126 | (67 | ) | 16,355 | 14,815 | 74 | (109 | ) | 14,780 | |||||||
| 38,191 | 439 | (71 | ) | 38,559 | 33,291 | 439 | (441 | ) | 33,289 | ||||||||
| Other debt securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| British government | 1,209 | 1,209 | 1,229 | 1,229 | |||||||||||||
| Other government | 5,049 | 5,049 | 6,089 | 6,089 | |||||||||||||
| Other public sector bodies | 41 | 41 | 145 | 145 | |||||||||||||
| Bank and building society | 2,703 | 2,703 | 3,600 | 3,600 | |||||||||||||
| Other issuers | 19,849 | 19,849 | 19,686 | 19,686 | |||||||||||||
| 28,851 | 28,851 | 30,749 | 30,749 | ||||||||||||||
| 67,042 | 67,410 | 64,040 | 64,038 | ||||||||||||||
| Due within one year | 14,512 | 11,954 | |||||||||||||||
| Due one year and over | 52,530 | 52,086 | |||||||||||||||
| 67,042 | 64,040 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Listed | 27,416 | 27,790 | 25,816 | 25,828 | |||||||||||||
| Unlisted | 10,775 | 10,769 | 7,475 | 7,461 | |||||||||||||
| 38,191 | 38,559 | 33,291 | 33,289 | ||||||||||||||
| Other debt securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Listed | 10,507 | 10,507 | 13,580 | 13,580 | |||||||||||||
| Unlisted | 18,344 | 18,344 | 17,169 | 17,169 | |||||||||||||
| 67,042 | 67,410 | 64,040 | 64,038 | ||||||||||||||
| Banking business | 38,920 | 34,372 | |||||||||||||||
| Trading business | 28,122 | 29,668 | |||||||||||||||
| Amounts above include: | |||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debt securities | 468 | 263 | |||||||||||||||
| Due from associated undertakings | |||||||||||||||||
| - unsubordinated | 7 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
| Unamortised discounts less premiums | |||||||||||||||||
| on investment securities | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
| The cost of securities carried at market value is not disclosed because it cannot be determined without unreasonable expense. |
| Movements in debt securities which are held as investment securities were as follows: |
| Cost £m |
Discounts
and premiums £m |
Provisions £m |
Book
value £m |
||||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 33,314 | (10 | ) | (13 | ) | 33,291 | |||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (1,787 | ) | (9 | ) | 3 | (1,793 | ) | ||
| Additions | 32,182 | - | - | 32,182 | |||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary | 304 | - | - | 304 | |||||
| Maturities and disposals | (25,880 | ) | 157 | (31 | ) | (25,754 | ) | ||
| Amounts written off | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | 5 | - | |||
| Provisions made net of write backs | - | - | (23 | ) | (23 | ) | |||
| Transfers | 33 | - | (9 | ) | 24 | ||||
| Amortisation of discounts and premiums | - | (40 | ) | - | (40 | ) | |||
| At 31 December 2002 | 38,162 | 97 | (68 | ) | 38,191 | ||||
page 113
| The following table categorises the Group’s investment debt securities by maturity and yield (based on weighted averages) at 31 December 2002: |
| Within 1 year | After
1
but within 5 years |
After
5 but within 10 years |
After 10 years | Total | |||||||
| Amount £m |
Yield % |
Amount £m |
Yield |
Amount £m |
Yield % |
Amount £m |
Yield % |
Amount £m |
Yield % |
||
| British government securities | 85 | 7.3 | 80 | 6.7 | 15 | 6.4 | 17 | 6.5 | 197 | 6.9 | |
| US
treasury and other US government securities |
- | - | 115 | 3.6 | 1,255 | 4.6 | 9,176 | 5.9 | 10,546 | 5.7 | |
| Other government securities | 764 | 2.1 | 657 | 6.0 | 27 | 7.1 | - | - | 1,448 | 3.9 | |
| Securities
issued by the states of the US |
1 | 3.6 | 2 | 5.8 | 7 | 3.4 | 10 | 2.8 | 20 | 3.3 | |
| Other public sector bodies | 93 | 5.7 | 179 | 2.4 | 359 | 4.9 | 57 | 1.8 | 688 | 4.1 | |
| Corporate debt securities | 2,797 | 2.8 | 4,028 | 2.4 | 298 | 2.6 | 369 | 3.2 | 7,492 | 2.6 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | - | - | 44 | 4.1 | 1,149 | 3.0 | 4,959 | 4.8 | 6,152 | 4.4 | |
| Bank and building society | 6,402 | 3.6 | 2,585 | 3.0 | 9 | 4.2 | - | - | 8,996 | 3.4 | |
| Other securities | 276 | 5.1 | 1,544 | 4.0 | 118 | 6.1 | 714 | 5.9 | 2,652 | 4.7 | |
| Total book value | 10,418 | 3.4 | 9,234 | 3.1 | 3,237 | 3.9 | 15,302 | 5.4 | 38,191 | 4.2 | |
| Total fair value | 10,464 | 9,226 | 3,272 | 15,597 | 38,559 | ||||||
| Gross gains of £70 million (2001 – £32 million) and gross losses of £7 million (2001 – £7 million) were realised on the sale and redemption of investment securities. |
| 16 | Equity shares |
| 2002 Book value £m |
Gross unrecognised gains £m |
Gross unrecognised losses £m |
2002 Valuation £m |
2001 Book value £m |
Gross unrecognised gains £m |
Gross unrecognised losses £m |
2001 Valuation £m |
||||
| Investment securities: | |||||||||||
| Listed | 1,097 | 43 | (127 | ) | 1,013 | 1,096 | 320 | (66 | ) | 1,350 | |
| Unlisted | 686 | - | - | 686 | 432 | 10 | - | 442 | |||
| 1,783 | 43 | (127 | ) | 1,699 | 1,528 | 330 | (66 | ) | 1,792 | ||
| Other securities: | |||||||||||
| Listed | 52 | - | - | 52 | 9 | - | - | 9 | |||
| Unlisted | 51 | - | - | 51 | 20 | - | - | 20 | |||
| 1,886 | 43 | (127 | ) | 1,802 | 1,557 | 330 | (66 | ) | 1,821 | ||
| Banking business | 1,849 | 1,545 | |||||||||
| Trading business | 37 | 12 | |||||||||
| The cost of securities carried at market value is not disclosed because it cannot be determined without unreasonable expense. |
| Movements in equity shares which are held as investment securities were as follows: |
| Cost £m |
Provisions £m |
Book
value £m |
|||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 1,541 | (13 | ) | 1,528 | |||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (6 | ) | 2 | (4 | ) | ||
| Additions | 519 | - | 519 | ||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary undertakings | 8 | - | 8 | ||||
| Disposals | (239 | ) | 6 | (233 | ) | ||
| Provisions made net of write backs | - | (36 | ) | (36 | ) | ||
| Transfers | 41 | (40 | ) | 1 | |||
| At 31 December 2002 | 1,864 | (81) | 1,783 | ||||
| Gross gains of £52 million (2001 – £57 million) and gross losses of £30 million (2001 – £34 million) were realised on the sale of investment securities. |
| page 114 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 17 |
Interests in associated undertakings Movements in interests in associated undertakings during the year were as follows: |
| Share
of net assets £m |
|||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 108 | ||||
| Additions | 7 | ||||
| Change of status | (18 | ) | |||
| Disposals | (2 | ) | |||
| Share of losses | (1 | ) | |||
| At 31 December 2002 | 94 | ||||
| Interests in associated undertakings are analysed as follows: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Banks - unlisted | 24 | 20 | |||||
| Others | 70 | 88 | |||||
| 94 | 108 | ||||||
| The principal associated undertakings are: |
| Total
issued share and loan capital at 31 December 2002 |
% held |
Share
of results based on accounts made up to |
Nature
of business |
||
|
Banco Santander, Portugal S.A. (incorporated in Portugal) |
31.1m ordinary shares of €5 €0.9m loan capital |
12.8 | 31 December* | Banking | |
|
Linea Directa Aseguradora S.A. (incorporated in Spain) |
2,400m €0.03 ordinary shares | 50.0 | 31 December* | Insurance | |
| * | Incorporating unaudited interim accounts. |
| Banco Santander, Portugal S.A. operates in Portugal and Linea Directa Aseguradora S.A. operates in Spain. |
| Dividends receivable from associated undertakings (excluding related tax credits) totalled £1 million (2001 – £1 million). |
| Associated undertakings are accounted for as such due to the Group’s interest being held on a long-term basis for the purpose of securing a contribution to its activities by the exercise of influence. |
page 115
| 18 | Shares
in Group undertakings Movements in shares in Group undertakings during the year were as follows: |
| £m | |||||
| As previously reported | 19,226 | ||||
| Prior year adjustment* | (920 | ) | |||
| At 1 January 2002 as restated | 18,306 | ||||
| Currency translation adjustments | (306 | ) | |||
| Additions | 468 | ||||
| Increase in net assets of subsidiary undertakings | 1,394 | ||||
| At 31 December 2002 | 19,862 | ||||
| * | restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002 and the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| On the historical cost basis, shares in Group undertakings at 31 December 2002 would have been included at a cost of £13,863 million (2001 – £13,701 million). |
| The principal subsidiary undertakings of the company are shown below. Their capital consists of ordinary and preference shares which are unlisted with the exception of certain preference shares issued by NatWest. The Royal Bank, NatWest (see note (4) below) and RBS Life Holdings are directly owned by the company, and all of the other subsidiary undertakings are owned directly, or indirectly through intermediate holding companies, by the Royal Bank or by NatWest, and are all wholly-owned. All of these subsidiaries are included in the Group’s consolidated financial statements and have an accounting reference date of 31 December. |
| Nature
of business |
Country
of incorporation and principal area of operation |
||
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | Banking | Great Britain | |
| Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | Banking | US | |
| Direct Line Insurance plc | Insurance | Great Britain | |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited | Banking | Jersey | |
| National Westminster Bank Plc (1,4) | Banking | Great Britain | |
| Coutts & Co (2) | Private banking | Great Britain | |
| Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Limited | Private banking | Switzerland | |
| Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. | Broker dealer | US | |
| Lombard North Central PLC | Banking, credit finance, leasing and hire purchase | Great Britain | |
| National Westminster Home Loans Limited | Home mortgage finance | Great Britain | |
| Ulster Bank Limited (3) | Banking | Northern Ireland | |
| RBS Life Holdings Limited | Life assurance | Great Britain | |
(1) |
Notes: The company does not hold any of the NatWest preference shares in issue. |
| (2) | Coutts & Co is incorporated with unlimited liability. Its registered office is 440 Strand, London WC2R 0Q5 |
| (3) | Ulster Bank Limited and its subsidiary undertakings also operate in the Republic of Ireland. |
| (4) | On 31 January 2003, ownership of NatWest was transferred from the company to the Royal Bank. |
| The above information is provided in relation to the principal subsidiaries as permitted by Section 231(5) of the Companies Act 1985. Full information on all subsidiaries will be included in the Annual Return filed with the UK Companies House. |
| page 116 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 19 | Loans to Group undertakings |
| Movements during the year: | £m | ||||
| As previously reported | 1,341 | ||||
| Prior year adjustment* | 820 | ||||
| At 1 January 2002 as restated | 2,161 | ||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (188 | ) | |||
| Additions | 1,421 | ||||
| Repayments | (40 | ) | |||
| At 31 December 2002 | 3,354 | ||||
| * | restated following the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| 20 | Intangible fixed assets |
| Goodwill | £m | ||||
| Cost: | |||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 14,513 | ||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (276 | ) | |||
| Arising on acquisitions during the year | 362 | ||||
| Disposals | (4 | ) | |||
| At 31 December 2002 | 14,595 | ||||
| Amortisation: | |||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 1,188 | ||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (20 | ) | |||
| Charge for the year | 731 | ||||
| Disposals | (1 | ) | |||
| At 31 December 2002 | 1,898 | ||||
| Net book value at 31 December 2002 | 12,697 | ||||
| Net book value at 31 December 2001 | 13,325 | ||||
page 117
| 21 | Tangible fixed assets |
| Freehold premises £m |
Long leasehold premises £m |
Short leasehold premises £m |
Computers and other equipment £m |
Assets
on operating leases £m |
Total £m |
||||||||||
| Cost or valuation: | |||||||||||||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 3,670 | 357 | 681 | 2,716 | 4,735 | 12,159 | |||||||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (16 | ) | 2 | (9 | ) | (21 | ) | (18 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||
| Reclassifications | 117 | 10 | (170 | ) | 43 | - | - | ||||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 38 | - | 9 | 27 | - | 74 | |||||||||
| Additions | 367 | 19 | 119 | 367 | 2,495 | 3,367 | |||||||||
| Disposals and write-off of fully depreciated assets | (189 | ) | (24 | ) | (19 | ) | (378 | ) | (877 | ) | (1,487 | ) | |||
| Revaluation adjustments | (36 | ) | 3 | - | - | - | (33 | ) | |||||||
| At 31 December 2002 | 3,951 | 367 | 611 | 2,754 | 6,335 | 14,018 | |||||||||
| Consisting of: | |||||||||||||||
| At valuation - 2002 | 2,355 | 182 | - | - | - | 2,537 | |||||||||
| - 2001 and prior | 498 | 109 | - | - | - | 607 | |||||||||
| At cost | 1,098 | 76 | 611 | 2,754 | 6,335 | 10,874 | |||||||||
| 3,951 | 367 | 611 | 2,754 | 6,335 | 14,018 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation: | |||||||||||||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 267 | 87 | 222 | 1,718 | 1,052 | 3,346 | |||||||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (1 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | - | (13 | ) | |||||
| Reclassifications | 14 | - | (9 | ) | (5 | ) | - | - | |||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 1 | - | - | 9 | - | 10 | |||||||||
| Disposals and write-off of fully depreciated assets | (1 | ) | (14 | ) | (17 | ) | (186 | ) | (487 | ) | (705 | ) | |||
| Charge for the year | 47 | 11 | 35 | 329 | 473 | 895 | |||||||||
| At 31 December 2002 | 327 | 85 | 229 | 1,854 | 1,038 | 3,533 | |||||||||
| Net book value at 31 December 2002 | 3,624 | 282 | 382 | 900 | 5,297 | 10,485 | |||||||||
| Net book value at 31 December 2001 | 3,403 | 270 | 459 | 998 | 3,683 | 8,813 | |||||||||
| On the historical cost basis, the Group’s freehold and long leasehold premises would have been included at £3,638 million (2001 – £3,368 million). |
| Freehold and long leasehold properties are revalued on a rolling basis, each property being valued at least every five years. Interim valuations outwith the 5 year cycle will be carried out on properties where there is an indication that their value has changed significantly, given market conditions. The directors are not aware of any material change in the valuation of the Group’s properties and therefore no additional interim valuations were required. |
| Properties occupied by the Group are valued on the basis of Existing Use Value, except for certain specialised properties which are valued on a Depreciated Replacement Cost basis. Investment and development properties and properties to be disposed of are valued to reflect Open Market Value.Valuations are carried out by internal and external qualified surveyors who are members of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors or, in the case of some overseas properties, locally qualified valuers. |
| Net book value: | 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|||||
| Land and buildings occupied for own use | 2,230 | 2,313 | |||||
| Investment properties | 1,789 | 1,731 | |||||
| Properties under development | 258 | 71 | |||||
| Properties to be disposed of | 11 | 17 | |||||
| 4,288 | 4,132 | ||||||
| Net book value of assets held under finance leases | 94 | 25 | |||||
| Depreciation for the year of assets held under finance leases | 34 | 2 | |||||
| Contracts for future capital expenditure not provided for in the accounts at the year end | |||||||
| Premises and equipment | 68 | 47 | |||||
| Assets on operating leases | 678 | 763 | |||||
| 746 | 810 | ||||||
| page 118 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 22 | Other assets |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Trading derivatives (see Note 39) | 13,210 | 10,850 | |||||
| Settlement balances | 4,102 | 5,804 | |||||
| Other | 3,719 | 4,896 | |||||
| 21,031 | 21,550 | ||||||
| 23 | Long-term
assurance business The long-term assurance assets and liabilities attributable to policyholders comprise: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Investments | 9,536 | 10,652 | |||||
| Value of in-force policies | 386 | 388 | |||||
| 9,922 | 11,040 | ||||||
| Long-term assurance business attributable to shareholders* | (811 | ) | (792 | ) | |||
| 9,111 | 10,248 | ||||||
| The increase in the shareholders’interest in the long-term assurance business included in the profit and loss account is calculated as follows: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Increase in value for the year before tax | 61 | 55 | |||||
| Tax | (18 | ) | (17 | ) | |||
| Increase in value for the year after tax | 43 | 38 | |||||
| * | The value of the long-term assurance business is calculated by discounting estimated future flows of statutory profits from in-force business at a discount rate that includes a risk margin. The future flows are based on prudent assumptions about long-term economic and business experience determined with the advice of qualified actuaries. The risk margin is designed to reflect uncertainties in expected future flows. |
| The key assumptions used are: |
| 2002 % |
2001 % |
||||||
| Risk discount rate (net of tax) | 8.50 | 10.00 | |||||
| Growth of unit-linked funds (gross of tax) | 6.75 | 7.25 | |||||
| Growth of non-unit-linked funds (gross of tax) | 5.00 | 5.50 | |||||
| Basic tax rate | 22.00 | 22.00 | |||||
| Shareholder taxation - life | 30.00 | 30.00 | |||||
| Expense inflation | 3.50 | 3.75 | |||||
page 119
| 24 | Deposits by banks |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Repayable on demand | 15,559 | 7,259 | |||||
| With agreed maturity dates or periods of notice, by remaining maturity | |||||||
| - three months or less | 35,125 | 25,560 | |||||
| - one year or less but over three months | 1,923 | 4,137 | |||||
| - five years or less but over one year | 805 | 1,132 | |||||
| - over five years | 1,308 | 1,950 | |||||
| 54,720 | 40,038 | ||||||
| Banking business | 34,474 | 28,884 | |||||
| Trading business | 20,246 | 11,154 | |||||
| 25 | Customer accounts |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Repayable on demand | 127,320 | 115,054 | |||||
| With agreed maturity dates or periods of notice, by remaining maturity | |||||||
| - three months or less | 81,015 | 70,479 | |||||
| - one year or less but over three months | 5,923 | 8,057 | |||||
| - five years or less but over one year | 4,367 | 4,062 | |||||
| - over five years | 536 | 1,343 | |||||
| 219,161 | 198,995 | ||||||
| Banking business | 195,670 | 183,058 | |||||
| Trading business | 23,491 | 15,937 | |||||
| Amounts above include: | |||||||
| Due to associated undertakings | 107 | 4 | |||||
| page 120 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 26 | Debt securities in issue |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Bonds and medium term notes, by remaining maturity | |||||||
| - one year or less | 2,150 | 3,136 | |||||
| - two years or less but over one year | 738 | 1,582 | |||||
| - five years or less but over two years | 3,096 | 3,128 | |||||
| - over five years | 1,391 | 1,249 | |||||
| 7,375 | 9,095 | ||||||
| Other debt securities in issue, by remaining maturity | |||||||
| - three months or less | 24,387 | 12,368 | |||||
| - one year or less but over three months | 1,366 | 9,196 | |||||
| - two years or less but over one year | 810 | 10 | |||||
| 26,563 | 21,574 | ||||||
| 33,938 | 30,669 | ||||||
| Banking business | 33,927 | 30,669 | |||||
| Trading business | 11 | - | |||||
| Issues are made under the Royal Bank’s £12 billion euro medium term note programme from time to time. Notes issued, which have a minimum maturity of six months from the date of issue, are included in the above amounts. |
| 27 | Other liabilities |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||||
| Notes in circulation | 1,318 | 1,405 | |||||
| Trading derivatives (see Note 39) | 14,729 | 11,075 | |||||
| Settlement balances | 3,031 | 6,010 | |||||
| Short positions: | |||||||
| Debt securities - Government | 14,155 | 12,207 | |||||
| - Other issuers | 1,660 | 2,415 | |||||
| Treasury bills and other eligible bills | 566 | - | |||||
| Current taxation | 982 | 912 | |||||
| Dividends | 946 | 831 | |||||
| Obligations under finance leases (analysed below) | 171 | 205 | |||||
| Other liabilities | 2,608 | 2,297 | |||||
| 40,166 | 37,357 | ||||||
| Analysis of obligations under finance leases: | 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|||||
| Amounts falling due within one year | 29 | 43 | |||||
| Amounts falling due between one and five years | 14 | 38 | |||||
| Amounts falling due after more than five years | 128 | 124 | |||||
| 171 | 205 | ||||||
page 121
| 28 | Deferred
taxation Provision for deferred taxation has been made as follow: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||
| Deferred tax provision | 1,834 | 1,650 | |||
| Deferred tax asset (included in Note 22, Other assets) | (39 | ) | (77 | ) | |
| Net deferred tax | 1,795 | 1,573 | |||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||||
| Short-term timing differences | 22 | (96) | |||
| Capital allowances | 1,965 | 1,792 | |||
| Bad and doubtful debt provisions | (238 | ) | (164 | ) | |
| Deferred gains | 46 | 41 | |||
| Net deferred tax | 1,795 | 1,573 | |||
| Movements during the year: | £m | ||||
| As previously reported | 1,456 | ||||
| Prior year adjustment* | 117 | ||||
| At 1 January 2002 as restated | 1,573 | ||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | 26 | ||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | (2 | ) | |||
| Disposal of lease receivables | (118 | ) | |||
| Charge to profit and loss account | 316 | ||||
| At 31 December 2002 | 1,795 | ||||
| * | restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. |
| 29 | Other provisions |
| Property(1) £m |
Pensions
and other similar obligations(2) £m |
Other(3) £m |
Total £m |
||||||
| At 1 January 2002 | 233 | 36 | 72 | 341 | |||||
| Currency translation and other adjustments | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | - | 1 | - | 1 | |||||
| Charge to profit and loss account | 66 | 3 | (19 | ) | 50 | ||||
| Provisions utilised | (36 | ) | (1 | ) | (20 | ) | (57 | ) | |
| At 31 December 2002 | 262 | 36 | 32 | 330 | |||||
(1) |
Notes: The Group has a number of leasehold properties where rents payable and other unavoidable costs exceed the value to the Group. Such costs arise over the period of the lease or to the expected termination date, and the provision has been discounted due to the long-term nature of certain of these obligations. |
| (2) | The Group operates various unfunded post-retirement benefit plans and provision is made for the expected costs that will arise over the periods in which pensions are paid to the members of these plans. |
| (3) | Other provisions arise in the normal course of business. |
| page 122 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 30 | Dated loan capital |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|||
| The company | ||||
| £200 million floating rate (minimum 5.25%) notes 2005 (1,2) | 120 | 160 | ||
| US$400 million 6.4% subordinated notes 2009 (1) | 247 | 274 | ||
| US$300 million 6.375% subordinated notes 2011 (1) | 184 | 204 | ||
| US$750 million 5% subordinated notes 2014 (issued October 2002) (1,3) | 461 | - | ||
| US$250 million 5% subordinated notes 2014 (issued November 2002) (1,4) | 151 | - | ||
| 1,163 | * | 638 | ||
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | ||||
| £125 million subordinated floating rate notes 2005 (5) | 125 | 125 | ||
| £150 million 8.375% subordinated notes 2007 | 149 | 149 | ||
| DEM500 million (redesignated €255 million) 5.25% subordinated notes 2008 | 165 | 155 | ||
| €300 million 4.875% subordinated notes 2009 | 194 | 182 | ||
| US$150 million floating rate notes 2009 (5) | 93 | 103 | ||
| £35 million floating rate step-up subordinated notes 2010 | 35 | 35 | ||
| US$350 million floating rate subordinated notes 2012 (issued March 2002) (6) | 217 | - | ||
| €130 million floating rate subordinated notes 2012 (issued April 2002) (7) | 85 | - | ||
| US$500 million floating rate subordinated notes 2012 (issued April 2002) (8) | 310 | - | ||
| £150 million 10.5% subordinated bonds 2013 (9) | 149 | 149 | ||
| €1,000 million 6.0% fixed rate subordinated notes 2013 | 644 | 604 | ||
| €500 million 6.0% fixed rate subordinated notes 2013 | 334 | 315 | ||
| US$50 million floating rate subordinated notes 2013 | 31 | 35 | ||
| £250 million 9.625% subordinated bonds 2015 | 247 | 247 | ||
| €100 million floating rate subordinated notes 2017 (issued November 2002) (10) | 65 | - | ||
| US$125.6 million floating rate subordinated notes 2020 | 78 | 87 | ||
| RBSG Capital Corporation | ||||
| US$250 million 10.125% guaranteed capital notes 2004 (1,9) | 155 | 172 | ||
| National Westminster Bank Plc | ||||
| US$250 million guaranteed floating rate subordinated notes 2002 (11) | - | 172 | ||
| US$500 million 9.375% guaranteed capital notes 2003 (12) | 315 | 355 | ||
| £100 million 12.5% subordinated unsecured loan stock 2004 | 108 | 112 | ||
| US$400 million guaranteed floating rate capital notes 2005 | 246 | 274 | ||
| US$1,000 million 7.375% fixed rate subordinated notes 2009 | 611 | 678 | ||
| US$650 million floating rate subordinated step-up notes 2009 (callable October 2004) | 404 | 450 | ||
| €600 million 6.0% subordinated notes 2010 | 386 | 361 | ||
| £300 million 8.125% step-up subordinated notes 2011 (callable December 2006) | 305 | 307 | ||
| €500 million 5.125% subordinated notes 2011 | 309 | 285 | ||
| £300 million 7.875% subordinated notes 2015 | 316 | 321 | ||
| £300 million 6.5% subordinated notes 2021 | 298 | 298 | ||
| Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. | ||||
| US$105 million subordinated loan capital 2004 floating rate notes | 65 | 72 | ||
| 7,602 | 6,681 | |||
| Dated loan capital in issue, by remaining maturity is repayable as follows: | ||||
| – in one year or less | 355 | 212 | ||
| – in two years or less but over one year | 772 | 395 | ||
| – in five years or less but over two years | 865 | 1,592 | ||
| – in more than five years | 5,610 | 4,482 | ||
| 7,602 | 6,681 | |||
| * | In addition, the company issued 1.25 million subordinated loan notes of €1,000 in June 2002 and 750,000 subordinated loan notes of US$1,000 in December 2002 to subsidiaries of the Group. These are included in the company balance sheet within loan capital but are reclassified as non-equity minority interests on consolidation (see Note 32). |
page 123
(1) |
Notes: On-lent to The Royal Bank of Scotland plc on a subordinated basis. |
| (2) | Repayable in five equal annual instalments in May in each of the years 2001 to 2005. |
| (3) | Net proceeds received US$744 million, £474 million. |
| (4) | Net proceeds received US$244 million, £154 million. |
| (5) | Repayable in whole, at the option of The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, prior to maturity, on conditions governing the respective debt obligation, including prior approval of the UK Financial Services Authority. |
| (6) | Net proceeds received US$349 million, £245 million. |
| (7) | Net proceeds received €130 million, £80 million. |
| (8) | Net proceeds received US$499 million, £345 million. |
| (9) | Unconditionally guaranteed by the company. |
| (10) | Net proceeds received €100 million, £64 million. |
| (11) | Redeemed on maturity in September 2002. |
| (12) | Loan due by a subsidiary undertaking and on-lent to National Westminster Bank Plc on a subordinated basis. It has been guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest by National Westminster Bank Plc. |
| (13) | In the event of certain changes in the tax laws of the UK, all of the dated loan capital issues are redeemable in whole, but not in part, at the option of the issuer, at the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest, subject to prior approval of the UK Financial Services Authority. |
| (14) | Except as stated above, claims in respect of the Group’s dated loan capital are subordinated to the claims of other creditors. None of the Group’s dated loan capital is secured. |
| (15) | Interest payable on the Group's floating rate dated issues is at a margin over London interbank rates. Interest on £1,450 million, US$3,450 million and €3,255 million of fixed rate dated issues is swapped into floating rates at a margin over London interbank rates. |
| page 124 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 31 | Undated loan capital including convertible debt |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||
| The company | |||
| US$350 million undated floating rate primary capital notes (callable on any interest payment date) (1,2) | 217 | 241 | |
| US$200 million 8.5% exchangeable capital securities, Series A (callable June 2004) (1,3) | 124 | 137 | |
| US$50 million undated 7.993% capital securities (callable November 2005) (1) | 31 | 34 | |
| US$35 million undated 7.755% capital securities (callable December 2005) (1) | 22 | 24 | |
| US$200 million undated 7.375% reset capital securities (callable April 2006) (1) | 124 | 137 | |
| US$75 million floating rate perpetual capital securities (callable September 2007) (1) | 46 | 52 | |
| US$1,200 million 7.648% perpetual regulatory tier one securities (callable September 2031) (1,4) | 737 | 820 | |
| 1,301 | 1,445 | ||
| The Royal Bank of Scotland plc | |||
| £125 million 9.25% undated subordinated step-up notes (callable April 2006) | 124 | 124 | |
| £150 million undated subordinated floating rate step-up notes (callable March 2007) | 149 | 149 | |
| FRF1,000 million (redesignated €152 million) 5.875% undated subordinated notes (callable October 2008) | 99 | 92 | |
| £175 million 7.375% undated subordinated notes (callable August 2010) | 173 | 173 | |
| £350 million 6.25% undated subordinated notes (callable December 2012) | 348 | 348 | |
| £200 million 9.5% undated subordinated bonds (callable August 2018) (5) | 197 | 197 | |
| £500 million 6.2% undated subordinated notes (issued March 2002; callable March 2022) (6) | 497 | - | |
| £300 million 5.625% undated subordinated notes (issued September 2002; callable September 2026) (7) | 298 | - | |
| £350 million 5.625% undated subordinated notes (callable June 2032) | 346 | 346 | |
| £150 million 5.625% undated subordinated notes (callable June 2032) | 144 | 144 | |
| National Westminster Bank Plc | |||
| US$500 million primary capital floating rate notes, Series A (callable on any interest payment date) | 310 | 345 | |
| US$500 million primary capital floating rate notes, Series B (callable on any interest payment date) | 310 | 345 | |
| US$500 million primary capital floating rate notes, Series C (callable on any interest payment date) | 310 | 345 | |
| US$500 million 7.875% exchangeable capital securities (callable November 2003) (8) | 308 | 329 | |
| US$500 million 7.75% reset subordinated notes (callable October 2007) | 304 | 336 | |
| €100 million floating rate undated subordinated step-up notes (callable October 2009) | 65 | 61 | |
| €400 million 6.625% fixed/floating rate undated subordinated notes (callable October 2009) | 257 | 241 | |
| £325 million 7.625% undated subordinated step-up notes (callable January 2010) | 330 | 331 | |
| £200 million 7.125% undated subordinated step-up notes (callable October 2022) | 203 | 203 | |
| £200 million 11.5% undated subordinated notes (callable December 2022) (9) | 290 | 295 | |
| 6,363 | 5,849 | ||
(1) |
Notes: On-lent to The Royal Bank of Scotland plc on a subordinated basis. |
| (2) | Interest is payable at a rate of 0.25% per annum over an average calculated by reference to six month euro dollar deposits in London for each interest period. |
| (3) | Redeemable in certain circumstances related to changes in the tax laws of the UK, in whole or in part, at the option of the company on any interest payment date. Exchangeable, in whole or in part, at the option of the company on any interest payment date, or in certain circumstances related to changes in the tax laws of the UK, in whole but not in part, into the company’s non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 each. |
| (4) | In August 2001, the company issued 1.2 million Series 1 perpetual regulatory tier one securities (‘PROs’) at US$1,000 per security. Following the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002, the Group has reclassified the PROs from non-equity shareholders’funds to subordinated liabilities. |
| The PROs have no maturity date and are not redeemable at the option of the holders at any time. The company has the option to redeem the securities on or after 30 September 2031 or on any interest payment date thereafter or at any time on the occurrence of certain events. No redemption of the PROs may be made by the company without the prior consent of the UK Financial Services Authority. |
| Interest on the PROs is payable semi-annually in arrears at a fixed rate of 7.648% per annum until 30 September 2031 and thereafter quarterly in arrears at a variable rate of 2.5% per annum above three month dollar LIBOR. The company can satisfy interest payment obligations by issuing ordinary shares to appointed Trustees sufficient to enable them, on selling these shares, to settle the interest payment. |
| (5) | Guaranteed by the company. |
| (6) | Net proceeds received £497 million. |
| (7) | Net proceeds received £298 million. |
| (8) | Exchangeable at the option of the issuer into 20 million 8.75% (gross) non-cumulative preference shares of US$25 each of National Westminster Bank Plc at any time. |
| (9) | Exchangeable at the option of the issuer into 200 million 8.392% (gross) non-cumulative preference shares of £1 each of National Westminster Bank Plc at any time. |
| (10) | Except as stated above, claims in respect of the Group’s undated loan capital are subordinated to the claims of other creditors. None of the Group’s undated loan capital is secured. |
| (11) | Except as stated above, interest payable on Group floating rate undated issues is at a margin over London interbank rates. Interest on £2,675 million, US$985 million and €552 million of fixed rate undated issues is swapped into floating rates at a margin over London interbank rates. |
| (12) | Where the issuer has the ability to redeem the undated loan capital, this is subject to prior approval of the UK Financial Services Authority. |
page 125
| 32 | Minority interests - non-equity |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||
| Non-equity shares issued by NatWest: | |||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$25 (1) | 325 | 355 | |
| Non-cumulative preference shares of £1 (2) | 166 | 166 | |
| 491 | 521 | ||
| Non-equity shares issued by other subsidiaries: | |||
| Non-cumulative trust preferred securities of €1,000 (3) | 806 | - | |
| Non-cumulative trust preferred securities of US$1,000 (4) | 456 | - | |
| Other non-equity minority interests | 97 | 59 | |
| Total | 1,850 | 580 | |
(1) |
Notes: The US$250 million non-cumulative preference shares, Series B, of US$25 each carry a gross dividend of 8.75% inclusive of associated tax credit. They are redeemable at the option of NatWest exercisable to 9 June 2003, at a premium per share of US$0.30. There is no redemption premium if the date of redemption falls after 9 June 2003. |
| The US$300 million non-cumulative preference shares, Series C, of US$25 each carry a gross dividend of 8.625% inclusive of associated tax credit. They are redeemable at the option of NatWest from 9 April 2002 to 8 April 2008 inclusive, at a premium per share of US$1.20 in 2003 reducing by US$0.30 in each successive year. There is no redemption premium if the date of redemption falls after 8 April 2007. |
| (2) | The £140 million 9% non-cumulative preference shares, Series A, of £1 each are non-redeemable. |
| (3) | In June 2002, a subsidiary of the Group issued 1.25 million Series A non-cumulative trust preferred securities at €1,000 per security. Net proceeds received were €1,237 million, £777 million. These securities have no maturity date and are not redeemable at the option of the holders at any time. The securities may, with the consent of the UK Financial Services Authority (“FSA”), be redeemed, in whole or in part, by the issuer on 30 June 2012 and on any interest payment date thereafter. They may also be redeemed in whole, but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax and regulatory events. Interest on the securities is payable annually in arrears at a fixed annual rate of 6.467% until 30 June 2012, and thereafter quarterly in arrears at a rate of 2.1% above three month EURIBOR for the relevant payment period. |
| (4) | In December 2002, another subsidiary of the Group issued 750,000 Series B non-cumulative trust preferred securities at US$1,000 per security. Net proceeds received were US$735 million, £465 million. These securities have no maturity date and are not redeemable at the option of the holders at any time. The securities may, with the consent of the FSA, be redeemed, in whole or in part, by the issuer on 31 March 2008 or on any interest payment date thereafter. They may also be redeemed in whole, but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax and regulatory events. Interest on the securities is payable quarterly in arrears at a fixed annual rate of 6.8% beginning on 31 March 2003. |
| (5) | Minority interests in the consolidated profit and loss account includes £67 million (2001 – £50 million; 2000 – £41 million) in respect of non-equity interests. |
| 33 | Share capital |
| Allotted, called up and fully paid | Authorised | |||||||
| 1
January 2002 £m |
Issued during the year £m |
Redeemed during the year £m |
31 December 2002 £m |
31
December 2002 £m |
31
December 2001 £m |
|||
| Equity shares | ||||||||
| Ordinary shares of 25p | 714 | 11 | - | 725 | 1,020 | 1,020 | ||
| Non-voting deferred shares of £0.01 | - | - | - | - | 323 | 323 | ||
| Total equity share capital | 714 | 11 | - | 725 | 1,343 | 1,343 | ||
| Preference shares and Additional Value Shares | ||||||||
| Additional Value Shares of £0.01 | 27 | - | - | 27 | 27 | 27 | ||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of US$0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of €0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of €0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.25 | 150 | - | (150 | ) | - | 225 | 225 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Cumulative preference shares of £1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of £1 | - | - | - | - | 300 | 300 | ||
| Total non-equity share capital | 179 | - | (150 | ) | 29 | 555 | 555 | |
| Total share capital | 893 | 11 | (150 | ) | 754 | 1,898 | 1,898 | |
| page 126 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 33 | Share capital (continued) |
| Allotted, called up and fully paid | Authorised | |||||
| Number of shares – thousands | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | ||
| Equity shares | ||||||
| Ordinary shares of 25p | 2,900,861 | 2,859,520 | 4,079,375 | 4,079,375 | ||
| Non-voting deferred shares of £0.01 | - | - | 32,300,000 | 32,300,000 | ||
| Additional Value Shares and preference shares | ||||||
| Additional Value Shares of £0.01 | 2,660,556 | 2,660,556 | 2,700,000 | 2,700,000 | ||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 | 106,000 | 106,000 | 238,500 | 238,500 | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of US$0.01 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 | ||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of €0.01 | - | - | 66,000 | 66,000 | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of €0.01 | 750 | 750 | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.25 | - | 600,000 | 900,000 | 900,000 | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.01 | 200 | 200 | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||
| Cumulative preference shares of £1 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | ||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of £1 | - | - | 300,000 | 300,000 | ||
| Ordinary shares The following issues of ordinary shares were made during the year to 31 December 2002: |
| (a) | 5.1 million ordinary shares following the exercise of options under the company’s executive, sharesave and option 2000 schemes and a further 10.1 million ordinary shares in respect of the exercise of options under the NatWest executive and sharesave schemes which had been exchanged for options over the company’s shares following the acquisition of NatWest; |
| (b) | 22.5 million ordinary shares in lieu of cash in respect of the final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2001 and the interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2002; and |
| (c) | 3.5 million ordinary shares under the company’s profit sharing (share ownership) scheme. |
| The total consideration for ordinary shares issued during the year amounted to £697 million. |
| During the year to 31 December 2002, options were granted over 15.1 million ordinary shares under the company’s executive, sharesave and option 2000 schemes. At 31 December 2002, options granted under the company’s various schemes, exercisable up to 2012 at prices ranging from 246p to 1841p per share, were outstanding in respect of 72.4 million ordinary shares. In addition, options granted under the NatWest schemes were outstanding in respect of 14 million ordinary shares exercisable up to 2009 at prices ranging from 312p to 924p per share. The Group has taken advantage of the exemption in UITF 17 ‘Employee share schemes’ applicable to SAYE schemes, and accordingly no cost has been recognised on the grant of sharesave options. |
| Additional Value Shares Approximately 2.7 billion Additional Value Shares (“AVS”) with a total nominal value of £27 million were issued to shareholders by way of a bonus issue in July 2000 in connection with the acquisition of NatWest. |
| Each AVS is expected to attract dividends, at the discretion of the directors, in aggregate of £1 per share. A dividend of 15 pence per AVS was paid on 3 December 2001 and a second dividend of 30 pence per AVS was paid on 2 December 2002. The final dividend of 55 pence per AVS, if declared, will be paid on 1 December 2003. |
| If the final dividend of 55 pence per AVS has not been paid by 1 December 2003, the AVS will convert into ordinary shares and reasonable efforts will be made to procure bids so as to result in the proceeds from the sale of which ordinary shares to realise 55 pence per AVS. |
| Preference shares In January 2002, the company redeemed the 600 million non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.25 each at a redemption price of £1 per share, at a total cost of £600 million. |
| In January 2003, the company redeemed the 8 million Series B and the 16 million Series C, non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 each, at a redemption price of US$25 per share, at a total cost of US$600 million. |
page 127
| Non-cumulative preference shares Non-cumulative preference shares entitle the holders thereof to receive periodic non-cumulative cash dividends at specified fixed rates for each Series payable out of distributable profits of the company. |
| The non-cumulative preference shares are redeemable at the option of the company, in whole or in part from time to time at the rates detailed below plus dividends otherwise payable for the then current dividend period accrued to the date of redemption. |
| Class of preference share | Series | Number of shares in issue |
Redemption date on or after |
Redemption price per share |
||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 | Series B | (1) | 8 million | 23 August 2001 | US$25.00 | |
| Series C | (1) | 16 million | 27 August 2002 | US$25.00 | ||
| Series D | 7 million | 14 September 2005 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series E | 8 million | 17 October 2006 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series F | 8 million | 31 March 2007 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series G | 10 million | 31 March 2003 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series H | 12 million | 31 March 2004 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series I | 12 million | 30 September 2004 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series J | 9 million | 31 December 2004 | US$25.00 | |||
| Series K | 16 million | 30 June 2006 | US$25.00 | |||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of US$0.01 | Series 1 | 1 million | 31 March 2010 | US$1,000 | ||
| Series 2 | 0.5 million | 31 March 2005 | US$1,000 | |||
| Series 3 | 0.4 million | 31 December 2005 | US$1,000 | |||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of €0.01 | Series 1 | 0.75 million | 31 March 2005 | €1,000 | ||
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.01 | Series 1 | 0.2 million | 31 December 2010 | £1,000 | ||
(1) |
Notes: Redeemed on 30 January 2003 at a redemption price of US$25 per share. |
| In the event that the non-cumulative convertible preference shares are not redeemed on or before the redemption date, the holder may convert the non-cumulative convertible preference shares into ordinary shares in the company. |
| Under existing arrangements, no redemption or purchase of any non-cumulative preference shares may be made by the company without the prior consent of the UK Financial Services Authority. |
| On a winding-up or liquidation of the company, the holders of the non-cumulative preference shares will be entitled to receive, out of the surplus assets available for distribution to the company’s shareholders (after payment of arrears of dividends on the cumulative preference shares up to the date of repayment) pari passu with the cumulative preference shares, the non-cumulative sterling preference shares and all other shares of the company ranking pari passu with the non-cumulative preference shares as regards participation in the surplus assets of the company, a liquidation distribution of US$25 per non-cumulative preference share of US$0.01, US$1,000 per non-cumulative convertible preference share of US$0.01, €1,000 per non-cumulative convertible preference share of €0.01 and £1,000 per non-cumulative convertible preference share of £0.01, together with an amount equal to dividends for the then current dividend period accrued to the date of payment, before any distribution or payment may be made to holders of the ordinary shares as regards participation in the surplus assets of the company. |
| Except as described above, the holders of the non-cumulative preference shares have no right to participate in the surplus assets of the company. |
| Holders of the non-cumulative preference shares are not entitled to receive notice of or attend general meetings of the company except if any resolution is proposed for adoption by the shareholders of the company to vary or abrogate any of the rights attaching to the non-cumulative preference shares or proposing the winding-up or liquidation of the company. In any such case, they are entitled to receive notice of and to attend the general meeting of shareholders at which such resolution is to be proposed and will be entitled to speak and vote on such resolution (but not on any other resolution). In addition, in the event that, prior to any general meeting of shareholders, the company has failed to pay in full the three most recent quarterly dividend payments due on the non-cumulative dollar preference shares, the two most recent semi-annual dividend payments due on the non-cumulative convertible dollar preference shares and the most recent annual dividend payments due on the non-cumulative convertible euro preference shares and on the non-cumulative convertible sterling preference shares, the holders shall be entitled to receive notice of, attend, speak and vote at such meeting on all matters together with the holders of the ordinary shares, and in these circumstances only, the rights of the holders of the non-cumulative preference shares so to vote shall continue until the company shall have resumed the payment in full of the dividends in arrears. |
| page 128 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 34 | Reserves |
| 2002 The Group £m |
2001 The Group £m |
2000 The Group £m |
2002 The company £m |
||||||
| Share premium account | |||||||||
| At 1 January | 7,465 | 6,530 | 2,157 | 7,465 | |||||
| Currency translation adjustments | (283 | ) | 58 | 159 | (283 | ) | |||
| Shares issued during the year | 685 | 870 | 4,421 | 685 | |||||
| Preference shares redeemed during the year | (268 | ) | - | (225 | ) | (268 | ) | ||
| Other movements | 9 | 7 | 18 | 9 | |||||
| At 31 December | 7,608 | 7,465 | 6,530 | 7,608 | |||||
| Merger reserve | |||||||||
| At 1 January | 12,029 | 12,604 | - | - | |||||
| Shares issued | - | 2,007 | 13,071 | - | |||||
| Transfer to profit and loss account | (574 | ) | (2,582 | ) | (467 | ) | - | ||
| At 31 December | 11,455 | 12,029 | 12,604 | - | |||||
| Other reserves | |||||||||
| At 1 January | 212 | 191 | 140 | 6 | |||||
| Redemption of preference shares | 150 | - | - | 150 | |||||
| Transfer of increase in value of long-term life assurance business | 25 | 17 | 65 | - | |||||
| Other movements | - | 4 | (14 | ) | - | ||||
| At 31 December | 387 | 212 | 191 | 156 | |||||
| Revaluation reserve | |||||||||
| As previously reported | 113 | 40 | 17 | 4,707 | |||||
| Prior year adjustment* | - | - | - | (100 | ) | ||||
| At 1 January as restated | 113 | 40 | 17 | 4,607 | |||||
| Revaluation of interests in subsidiary undertakings | - | - | - | 1,394 | |||||
| Revaluation of premises | (33 | ) | 72 | 24 | - | ||||
| Transfer from/(to) profit and loss account | - | 1 | (1 | ) | - | ||||
| At 31 December | 80 | 113 | 40 | 6,001 | |||||
| Profit and loss account | |||||||||
| As previously reported | 6,073 | 2,903 | 1,919 | 4,430 | |||||
| Prior year adjustment* | (117 | ) | (117 | ) | (96 | ) | - | ||
| At 1 January as restated | 5,956 | 2,786 | 1,823 | 4,430 | |||||
| Currency translation adjustments and other movements | 27 | (14 | ) | 29 | - | ||||
| Retention for the year | 704 | 783 | 690 | (415 | ) | ||||
| Employee share option payments | (136 | ) | (163 | ) | (159 | ) | (136 | ) | |
| Redemption of preference shares | (332 | - | - | (332 | ) | ||||
| Transfer from merger reserve | 574 | 2,582 | 467 | - | |||||
| Transfer of increase in value of long-term life assurance business | (25 | ) | (17 | ) | (65 | ) | - | ||
| Transfer (to)/from revaluation reserve | - | (1 | ) | 1 | - | ||||
| At 31 December | 6,768 | 5,956 | 2,786 | 3,547 | |||||
| * | restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. |
| The cumulative goodwill arising on acquisitions of subsidiary and associated undertakings which are still part of the Group and written off directly against profit and loss account reserves of the Group amounted to £1,173 million at 31 December 2002. |
| In 1997, the Group established a Qualifying Employee Share Ownership Trust (‘QUEST’) for the purposes of delivering shares on the exercise of options under the sharesave scheme. During the year ended 31 December 2002, the Group received £195 million (2001 –£221 million) on the issue of 12.1 million shares (2001 – 13.5 million shares) in respect of options under the sharesave scheme. Employees paid £59 million (2001 – £58 million) to the Group for the issue of these shares. A transfer of £136 million(2001 – £163 million) has been made from the profit and loss account reserves to the share premium account in respect of this transaction. |
page 129
| At 31 December 2002, 919,255 (2001 – 816,254) ordinary shares of 25p each of the company and 48,063 Additional Value Shares were held by the 1992 Employee Share Trust in respect of options under the executive option scheme and awards under the restricted share scheme. Included in ‘Other assets’ is an amount which reflects the exercise price of the options that the shares are expected to be used to satisfy. |
| Exchange gains of £281 million (2001 – losses £27 million) arising on foreign currency borrowings have been offset in the Group’s profit and loss account reserves against differences on retranslating the net investment in overseas subsidiary and associated undertakings financed by these borrowings. |
| The tax effect of gains and losses taken directly to reserves was £7 million charge (2001 – £1 million charge). |
| Non-equity shareholders’ funds: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 | 1,628 | 1,805 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of US$0.01 | 1,169 | 1,298 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of €0.01 | 486 | 455 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.25 | - | 600 | |
| Non-cumulative convertible preference shares of £0.01 | 196 | 195 | |
| Cumulative preference shares of £1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Total preference shares | 3,480 | 4,354 | |
| Additional Value Shares of £0.01 | 27 | 27 | |
| 3,507 | 4,381 | ||
| 35 |
Lease commitments The annual rental commitments of the Group under non-cancellable operating leases were as follows: |
| 2002 | 2001 | |||||
| Premises £m |
Equipment £m |
Premises £m |
Equipment £m |
|||
| Expiring within one year | 7 | 4 | 16 | 2 | ||
| Expiring between one and five years | 39 | 13 | 49 | 9 | ||
| Expiring after five years | 184 | - | 183 | 2 | ||
| 230 | 17 | 248 | 13 | |||
| 36 | Analysis of total assets and liabilities |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|||
| Assets: | denominated in sterling | 220,259 | 204,691 | |
| denominated in currencies other than sterling | 191,741 | 164,168 | ||
| 412,000 | 368,859 | |||
| Liabilities: | denominated in sterling | 216,013 | 205,032 | |
| denominated in currencies other than sterling | 195,987 | 163,827 | ||
| 412,000 | 368,859 | |||
| 37 |
Collateral given and received under repurchase
transactions The Group enters into securities repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions under which it receives or transfers cash or securities as collateral in accordance with normal market practice. Securities transferred under repurchase transactions included within securities on the balance sheet were as follows: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||
| Treasury and other eligible bills | 1,820 | 1,353 | |
| Debt securities | 23,299 | 27,576 | |
| 25,119 | 28,929 | ||
| Of the above securities, £25.1 billion (2001 – £23.7 billion) could be resold or repledged by the holder. Securities received as collateral under reverse repurchase agreements amounted to £46.1 billion (2001 – £35.5 billion), of which £39.3 billion (2001 – £22.6 billion) had been resold or repledged as collateral for the Group’s own transactions. |
| page 130 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 38 | Assets charged as security for liabilities |
| Assets charged as security for liabilities | 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|
| Loans and advances to customers | 852 | 1,761 | |
| Debt securities | 4,017 | 3,344 | |
| Tangible fixed assets | 1,010 | 1,293 | |
| Other | 599 | 115 | |
| 6,478 | 6,513 | ||
| Included above are assets pledged with overseas government agencies and banks, and margin deposits placed with exchanges. |
| Liabilities secured by charges on assets | 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
|
| Deposits by banks | 2,778 | 2,933 | |
| Customer accounts | 2,233 | 2,339 | |
| Debt securities in issue | 591 | 585 | |
| Other | - | 25 | |
| 5,602 | 5,882 | ||
| 39 |
Derivatives In the normal course of business, the Group enters into a variety of derivative transactions principally in the foreign exchange and interest rate markets. These are used to provide financial services to customers and to take, hedge and modify positions as part of trading activities. Derivatives are also used to hedge or modify risk exposures arising on the balance sheet from a variety of activities including lending and securities investment. |
| The principal types of derivative contracts into which the Group enters are described below. |
| Swaps These are over-the-counter (“OTC”) agreements between two parties to exchange periodic payments of interest, or payments for the change in value of a commodity, or related index, over a set period based on notional principal amounts. The Group enters into swap transactions in several markets. Interest rate swaps exchange fixed rates for floating rates of interest based on notional amounts. Basis swaps exchange floating or fixed interest calculated using different bases. Cross currency swaps are the exchange of interest based on notional values of different currencies. Equity and commodity swaps exchange interest for the return on an equity or commodity, or equity or commodity index. |
| Options Currency and interest rate options confer the right, but not the obligation, on the buyer to receive or pay a specific quantity of an asset or financial instrument for a specified price at or before a specified date. Options may be exchange traded or OTC agreements. The Group principally buys and sells currency and interest rate options. |
| Futures and forwards Short-term interest rate futures, bond futures and forward foreign exchange contracts are all agreements to deliver, or take delivery of, a specified amount of an asset or financial instrument based on the specified rate, price or index applied against the underlying asset or financial instrument, at a specified date. Futures are exchange traded at standardised amounts of the underlying asset or financial instrument. Forward contracts are OTC agreements and are principally dealt in by the Group in interest rates as forward rate agreements and in currency as forward foreign exchange contracts. |
| Collateral The Group may require collateral in respect of the credit risk in derivative transactions. The amount of credit risk is principally the positive fair value of contracts. Collateral may be in the form of cash or in the form of a lien over a customer’s assets entitling the Group to make a claim for current and future liabilities. |
page 131
| Maturity of replacement cost of over-the-counter contracts (trading and non-trading) Replacement cost indicates the Group’s derivatives credit exposure. The following table sets forth the gross positive fair values by maturity. The net replacement cost of internal trades is not included as there is no credit risk associated with them. |
|
Within one year £m |
One
to five years £m |
Over five years £m |
2002 Total £m |
Within one year £m |
One
to five years £m |
Over five years £m |
2001 Total £m |
||
| Before netting: | |||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts |
14,531 |
2,191 |
540 |
17,262 |
10,146 |
2,083 |
409 |
12,638 |
|
| Interest rate contracts |
9,039 |
29,148 |
26,273 |
64,460 |
10,055 |
16,846 |
9,952 |
36,853 |
|
| Equity and commodity contracts |
102 |
693 |
15 |
810 |
52 |
134 |
2 |
188 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
23,672 |
32,032 |
26,828 |
82,532 |
20,253 |
19,063 |
10,363 |
49,679 |
||
| |
|||||||||
| Banks and investment firms |
69,416 |
39,613 |
|||||||
| Others |
13,116 |
10,066 |
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
82,532 |
49,679 |
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
| At 31 December 2002, the potential credit risk exposure, which is after netting and allowing for collateral received, of the Group’s trading and non-trading derivatives, was £5,428 million (2001 – £5,480 million) to banks and investment firms and £5,482 million (2001 – £4,064 million) to other counterparties. |
| Exchange traded contracts are excluded from the above table. Such contracts generally involve lower credit risk than OTC contracts as they are cleared through exchanges that require margin from participants and the daily settlement of gains and losses. |
| Trading derivatives The following table shows the fair values of instruments in the derivatives trading portfolio: |
2002 End of period fair value |
2001 End of period fair value |
||||||||
| | |||||||||
| Assets £m |
Liabilities £m |
Assets £m |
Liabilities £m |
||||||
| Exchange rate contracts: | |||||||||
| Spot, forwards and futures | 12,102 | 12,572 | 7,271 | 7,086 | |||||
| Currency swaps | 2,633 | 3,596 | 2,439 | 2,452 | |||||
| Options purchased | 2,482 | - | 2,876 | - | |||||
| Options written | - | 2,457 | - | 3,057 | |||||
| 17,217 | 18,625 | 12,586 | 12,595 | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts: | |||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 59,456 | 59,915 | 33,186 | 33,415 | |||||
| Options purchased | 3,332 | - | 2,858 | - | |||||
| Options written | - | 3,341 | - | 2,820 | |||||
| Futures and forwards | 1,284 | 1,164 | 594 | 616 | |||||
| 64,072 | 64,420 | 36,638 | 36,851 | ||||||
| Equity and commodity contracts | 733 | 496 | 472 | 475 | |||||
| 82,022 | 83,541 | 49,696 | 49,921 | ||||||
| Netting | (68,812 | ) |
(68,812 | ) |
(38,846 | ) |
(38,846 | ) |
|
| 13,210 | 14,729 | 10,850 | 11,075 | ||||||
| Average fair values (before netting): | |||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts | 13,565 | 14,581 | 13,781 | 14,079 | |||||
| Interest rate contracts | 42,255 | 42,693 | 30,203 | 30,862 | |||||
| Equity and commodity contracts | 545 | 483 | 244 | 262 | |||||
| 56,365 | 57,757 | 44,228 | 45,203 | ||||||
| Gains and losses on exchange traded contracts subject to daily margining requirements are settled daily. The fair value of such contracts included above reflects the last day’s variation margin. |
| page 132 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 39 | Derivatives
(continued) The following table analyses, by maturity and contract type, the notional principal amounts of the Group’s trading derivatives: |
| Within one year £bn |
One
to five years £bn |
Over five years £bn |
2002 Total £bn |
Within one year £bn |
One
to five years £bn |
Over five years £bn |
2001 Total £bn |
|||
| Exchange rate contracts: | ||||||||||
| Spot, forwards and futures | 504.5 | 31.3 | 0.2 | 536.0 | 464.7 | 20.3 | 0.3 | 485.3 | ||
| Currency swaps | 46.8 | 54.0 | 22.7 | 123.5 | 45.3 | 38.7 | 14.6 | 98.6 | ||
| Options purchased | 114.9 | 4.7 | - | 119.6 | 100.7 | 5.0 | 0.1 | 105.8 | ||
| Options written | 114.0 | 5.7 | 0.2 | 119.9 | 95.1 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 98.9 | ||
| 780.2 | 95.7 | 23.1 | 899.0 | 705.8 | 67.7 | 15.1 | 788.6 | |||
| Interest rate contracts: | ||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 1,118.7 | 1,210.3 | 493.3 | 2,822.3 | 925.8 | 998.0 | 387.3 | 2,311.1 | ||
| Options purchased | 69.5 | 68.5 | 38.9 | 176.9 | 86.7 | 89.4 | 47.2 | 223.3 | ||
| Options written | 51.9 | 70.2 | 38.8 | 160.9 | 61.2 | 94.8 | 47.4 | 203.4 | ||
| Futures and forwards | 606.4 | 155.4 | 0.5 | 762.3 | 717.7 | 203.1 | 0.1 | 920.9 | ||
| 1,846.5 | 1,504.4 | 571.5 | 3,922.4 | 1,791.4 | 1,385.3 | 482.0 | 3,658.7 | |||
| Equity and commodity contracts | 12.9 | 10.4 | 0.2 | 23.5 | 14.8 | 3.8 | - | 18.6 | ||
| Non-trading derivatives The Group establishes non-trading derivatives positions externally with third parties and also internally. It should be noted that the following tables include the components of the internal hedging programme that transfers risks to the trading portfolios in the Group or to external third party participants in the derivatives markets. |
| The following table summarises the fair values and book values of derivatives held for non-trading activities and includes internal trades: |
| 2002 Fair value |
2002
Book value |
2001 Fair value |
2001 Book value |
||||||
Positive £m |
Negative £m |
Positive £m |
Negative £m |
Positive £m |
Negative £m |
Positive £m |
Negative £m |
||
|
|
|||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Spot, forwards and futures | 25 |
135 |
16 |
125 |
57 |
53 |
27 |
32 |
|
| Currency swaps and options | 199 |
107 |
111 |
76 |
134 |
122 |
114 |
101 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 224 |
242 |
127 |
201 |
191 |
175 |
141 |
133 |
||
|
|
|||||||||
| Interest rate contracts: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest rate swaps | 2,983 |
2,508 |
675 |
587 |
1,836 |
2,078 |
690 |
771 |
|
| Futures, forwards and options | 14 |
74 |
- |
- |
10 |
6 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 2,997 |
2,582 |
675 |
587 |
1,846 |
2,084 |
690 |
771 |
||
|
|
|||||||||
| Equity and commodity contracts | 86 |
141 |
77 |
9 |
21 |
15 |
21 |
15 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total | 3,307 |
2,965 |
879 |
797 |
2,058 |
2,274 |
852 |
919 |
|
| |
|||||||||
| The following table analyses, by maturity and contract type, the notional principal amounts of the Group’s non-trading derivatives (third party and internal): |
| Within one year £bn |
One
to five years £bn |
Over five years £bn |
2002 Total £bn |
Within one year £bn |
One
to five years £bn |
Over five years £bn |
2001 Total £bn |
||
| Exchange rate contracts: | |||||||||
| Spot, forwards and futures | 8.8 | - | - | 8.8 | 8.5 | 0.1 | - | 8.6 | |
| Currency swaps and options | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 5.3 | |
| 10.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 14.1 | 10.9 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 13.9 | ||
| Interest rate contracts: | |||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 32.0 | 45.4 | 33.4 | 110.8 | 34.9 | 45.5 | 26.7 | 107.1 | |
| Futures, forwards and options | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | - | 1.6 | |
| 32.9 | 46.3 | 34.5 | 113.7 | 35.8 | 46.2 | 26.7 | 108.7 | ||
| Equity and commodity contracts | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | - | 0.8 | |
page 133
| 40 |
Financial instruments The Group’s objectives and policies in managing the risks that arise in connection with the use of financial instruments are set out in the Operating and financial review under ‘Market risk’, ‘Currency risk’ and ‘Equity risk’. |
| Interest rate sensitivity gap The tables below summarise the Group’s interest rate sensitivity gap for its non-trading book at 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2001. The tables show the contractual re-pricing for each category of asset, liability and for off-balance sheet items. A liability (or negative) gap position exists when liabilities reprice more quickly or in greater proportion than assets during a given period and tends to benefit net interest income in a declining interest rate environment. An asset (or positive) gap position exists when assets reprice more quickly or in greater proportion than liabilities during a given period and tends to benefit net interest income in a rising interest rate environment. Contractual repricing terms do not reflect the potential impact of early repayment or withdrawal. Positions may not be reflective of those in subsequent periods. Major changes in positions can be made promptly as market outlooks change. In addition, significant variations in interest rate sensitivity may exist within the re-pricing periods presented and among the currencies in which the Group has interest rate positions. |
| 2002 | Within 3 months £m |
After 3 months but within 6 months £m |
After 6 months but within 1 year £m |
After 1 year but within 5 years £m |
After 5 years £m |
Non-interest bearing funds £m |
Banking book total £m |
Trading book total £m |
Total £m |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and advances to banks | 14,208 | 4,572 | 2,569 | 2 | 26 | 482 | 21,859 | 22,437 | 44,296 | |||||||
| Loans and advances to customers | 139,822 | 12,547 | 9,134 | 25,023 | 10,228 | 1,064 | 197,818 | 25,506 | 223,324 | |||||||
| Treasury bills and debt securities | 23,498 | 4,529 | 3,693 | 6,639 | 5,130 | - | 43,489 | 35,012 | 78,501 | |||||||
| Other assets | - | - | - | - | - | 48,322 | 48,322 | 17,557 | 65,879 | |||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 177,528 | 21,648 | 15,396 | 31,664 | 15,384 | 49,868 | 311,488 | 100,512 | 412,000 | |||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Deposits by banks | 31,189 | 731 | 623 | 177 | 459 | 1,295 | 34,474 | 20,246 | 54,720 | |||||||
| Customer accounts | 158,253 | 3,747 | 2,146 | 3,232 | 373 | 27,919 | 195,670 | 23,491 | 219,161 | |||||||
| Debt securities in issue | 27,462 | 1,030 | 1,307 | 3,615 | 513 | - | 33,927 | 11 | 33,938 | |||||||
| Subordinated liabilities | 2,688 | 528 | 623 | 1,446 | 8,615 | - | 13,900 | 65 | 13,965 | |||||||
| Other liabilities | 3 | 11 | 15 | 14 | 128 | 27,418 | 27,589 | 35,575 | 63,164 | |||||||
| Shareholders’funds | - | - | - | - | - | 26,182 | 26,182 | 870 | 27,052 | |||||||
| Internal funding of trading business |
(19,634 | ) |
- | (620 | ) |
- | - | - | (20,254 | ) |
20,254 | - | ||||
| |
||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 199,961 | 6,047 | 4,094 | 8,484 | 10,088 | 82,814 | 311,488 | 100,512 | 412,000 | |||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||
| Off-balance sheet items | (1,762 | ) |
(3,141 | ) |
(1,946 | ) |
3,708 | 3,141 | - | |||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate sensitivity gap |
(24,195 | ) |
12,460 | 9,356 | 26,888 | 8,437 | (32,946 | ) |
||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative interest
rate sensitivity gap |
(24,195 | ) |
(11,735 | ) |
(2,379 | ) |
24,509 | 32,946 | ||||||||
| page 134 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 40 | Financial instruments (continued) |
| 2001 | Within 3 months £m |
After 3 months but within 6 months £m |
After 6 months but within 1 year £m |
After 1 year but within 5 years £m |
After 5 years £m |
Non-interest bearing funds £m |
Banking book total £m |
Trading book total £m |
Total £m |
|||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans and advances to banks | 16,865 | 2,381 | 2,184 | 16 | 42 | 191 | 21,679 | 16,834 | 38,513 | |||||||||
| Loans
and advances to customers |
122,258 |
11,514 |
7,263 |
26,055 |
8,943 |
2,443 |
178,476 |
12,016 |
190,492 |
|||||||||
| Treasury bills and debt securities | 16,401 |
2,359 |
2,727 |
9,891 |
4,931 |
- |
36,309 |
37,867 |
74,176 |
|||||||||
| Other assets | - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
48,007 |
48,007 |
17,671 |
65,678 |
|||||||||
| Total assets | 155,524 |
16,254 |
12,174 |
35,962 |
13,916 |
50,641 |
284,471 |
84,388 |
368,859 |
|||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits by banks | 24,138 |
1,988 |
620 |
675 |
561 |
902 |
28,884 |
11,154 |
40,038 |
|||||||||
| Customer accounts | 147,428 |
3,938 |
2,767 |
2,822 |
326 |
25,777 |
183,058 |
15,937 |
198,995 |
|||||||||
| Debt securities in issue | 16,412 |
5,882 |
4,477 |
3,126 |
772 |
- |
30,669 |
- |
30,669 |
|||||||||
| Subordinated liabilities | 2,941 |
517 |
- |
1,736 |
7,264 |
- |
12,458 |
72 |
12,530 |
|||||||||
| Other liabilities | 10 |
11 |
22 |
38 |
124 |
25,746 |
25,951 |
34,008 |
59,959 |
|||||||||
| Shareholders’ funds | - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25,266 |
25,266 |
1,402 |
26,668 |
|||||||||
| Internal
funding of trading business |
(20,804 |
) | (903 |
) | (95 |
) | - |
- |
(13 |
) |
(21,815 |
) | 21,815 |
- |
||||
| Total liabilities | 170,125 |
11,433 |
7,791 |
8,397 |
9,047 |
77,678 |
284,471 |
84,388 |
368,859 |
|||||||||
| Off-balance sheet items | (3,402 |
) | (5,757 |
) | 827 |
(885 |
) | 9,217 |
- |
|||||||||
| Interest rate sensitivity gap | (18,003 |
) | (936 |
) | 5,210 |
26,680 |
14,086 |
(27,037 |
) |
|||||||||
| Cumulative
interest rate sensitivity gap |
(18,003 |
) | (18,939 |
) | (13,729 |
) | 12,951 |
27,037 |
||||||||||
| Currency risk The Group does not maintain material non-trading open currency positions other than the structural foreign currency translation exposures arising from its investment in overseas subsidiary and associated undertakings and their related funding. |
| The Group’s structural currency exposures were as follows: |
| Functional
currency of net investment |
Net investments in overseas operations £m |
Foreign currency borrowings hedging net investments £m |
2002 Structural foreign currency exposures £m |
Net investments in overseas operations £m |
Foreign currency borrowings hedging net investments £m |
2001 Structural foreign currency exposures £m |
|
| |
|||||||
| US dollar | 5,190 | 5,107 | 83 | 5,207 | 5,162 | 45 | |
| Euro | 1,019 | 558 | 461 | 797 | 242 | 555 | |
| Swiss franc | 306 | 295 | 11 | 250 | 243 | 7 | |
| Other non-sterling | 35 | 30 | 5 | 61 | 46 | 15 | |
| |
|||||||
| Total | 6,550 | 5,990 | 560 | 6,315 | 5,693 | 622 | |
| |
|||||||
| Trading book market risk An explanation of the value-at-risk (“VaR”) methodology of estimating potential losses arising from the Group’s exposure to market risk in its trading book and the main assumptions and parameters underlying it is given in ‘Risk management – market risk’ in the Operating and financial review. |
| The following table analyses the VaR for the Group’s trading portfolios by type of market risk exposure at the period end and as an average for the period and the maximum and minimum for the period: |
| 31
December 2002 £m |
Year
ended 31
December 2002
|
31 December 2001 £m |
Year
ended 31
December
2001
|
||||||||
| Maximum £m |
Minimum £m |
Average £m |
Maximum £m |
Minimum £m |
Average £m |
||||||
| |
|||||||||||
| Interest rate | 8.4 | 11.6 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 7.9 | 15.4 | 7.7 | 11.1 | |||
| Currency | 1.2 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | |||
| Equity | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |||
| Diversification effects | (1.8 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total | 8.4 | 11.8 | 5.6 | 9.1 | 8.2 | 15.6 | 7.7 | 11.3 | |||
page 135
| Fair values of financial instruments The following tables set out the fair values of the Group’s financial instruments. Fair value is the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Quoted market values are used where available; otherwise, fair values have been estimated based on discounted expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties and require assumptions and judgments covering prepayments, credit risk and discount rates. Changes in these assumptions would significantly affect estimated fair values. The fair values reported would not necessarily be realised in an immediate sale; nor are there plans to settle liabilities prior to contractual maturity. As there is a wide range of valuation techniques, it may be inappropriate to compare the Group’s fair value information to independent markets or other financial institutions’ fair value. |
| Trading business | Note | 2002 Carrying amount £m |
2002 Fair value £m |
2001 Carrying amount £m |
2001 Fair value £m |
|||||
| Assets | ||||||||||
| Treasury bills and other eligible bills | (1) | 6,890 | 6,890 | 8,199 | 8,199 | |||||
| Loans and advances to banks and customers | (1) | 47,943 | 47,943 | 28,850 | 28,850 | |||||
| Debt securities | (1) | 28,122 | 28,122 | 29,668 | 29,668 | |||||
| Equity shares | (1) | 37 | 37 | 12 | 12 | |||||
| Derivatives | (2) | 13,210 | 13,210 | 10,850 | 10,850 | |||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||
| Deposits by banks and customer accounts | (3) | 43,737 | 43,737 | 27,091 | 27,091 | |||||
| Debt securities in issue | (1) | 11 | 11 | - | - | |||||
| Short positions in securities | (1) | 16,381 | 16,381 | 14,622 | 14,622 | |||||
| Subordinated loan capital | (1) | 65 | 65 | 72 | 72 | |||||
| Derivatives | (2) | 14,729 | 14,729 | 11,075 | 11,075 | |||||
| Banking business | Note | 2002 Carrying amount £m |
2002 Fair value £m |
2001 Carrying amount £m |
2001 Fair value £m |
|||||
| Assets | ||||||||||
| Cash and balances at central banks | (1) | 3,481 | 3,481 | 3,093 | 3,093 | |||||
| Items in the course of collection from other banks | (1) | 2,741 | 2,741 | 3,288 | 3,288 | |||||
| Treasury bills and other eligible bills | (1) | 4,569 | 4,569 | 1,937 | 1,937 | |||||
| Loans and advances to banks and customers | (4) | 219,677 | 221,883 | 200,155 | 200,811 | |||||
| Debt securities | (5) | 38,920 | 39,288 | 34,372 | 34,370 | |||||
| Equity shares | (5) | 1,849 | 1,765 | 1,545 | 1,809 | |||||
| Derivatives – net | (2) | 82 | 342 | (67 | ) | (216 | ) | |||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||
| Items in the course of transmission to other banks | (1) | 1,258 | 1,258 | 2,109 | 2,109 | |||||
| Deposits by banks and customer accounts | (3) | 230,144 | 230,266 | 211,942 | 212,079 | |||||
| Debt securities in issue | (6) | 33,927 | 33,941 | 30,669 | 30,933 | |||||
| Subordinated loan capital | (7) | 13,900 | 14,890 | 12,458 | 12,937 | |||||
| Non-equity minority interests | (7) | 1,850 | 1,984 | 580 | 632 | |||||
| Non-equity shareholders’ funds | (7) | 3,507 | 5,277 | 4,381 | 6,760 | |||||
(1) |
Notes: Financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value or where carrying value approximates to fair value because they are of short maturity or repricing date. |
| (2) | Fair values of derivatives are determined by market prices where available. Otherwise fair value is based on current market information using appropriate valuation models. |
| (3) | The fair value of deposits repayable on demand is equal to their carrying value. The fair values of term deposits and time certificates of deposit are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. |
| (4) | For loans which reprice frequently or are linked to the Group’s base rate, and for which there has been no significant change in credit risk since inception, carrying value represents a reasonable estimate of fair value. For other loans, fair values are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows, using current interest rates appropriate to the type of loan, and making adjustments for credit risk. |
| (5) | Fair values of marketable securities are based on quoted market prices. Where these are unavailable, fair value is estimated using other valuation techniques. |
| (6) | The fair value of short-term debt securities in issue is approximately equal to their carrying value. The fair value of other debt securities in issue is based on quoted market prices where available, or where these are unavailable, is estimated using other valuation techniques. |
| (7) | The fair value of loan capital, non-equity minority interests and preference shares is based on quoted market prices where available. For unquoted loan capital, fair value has been estimated using other valuation techniques. |
| (8) | Fair values are not given for financial commitments and contingent liabilities. The diversity of the fee structures, the lack of an established market and the difficulty of separating the value of the instruments from the value of the overall relationship involve such uncertainty that it is not meaningful to provide an estimate of their fair value. (The principal amounts of these instruments are given in Note 41). |
| page 136 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 40 | Financial
instruments (continued) Hedges As described in the accounting policies, derivatives and debt securities held for hedging purposes are accounted for in accordance with the treatment of the hedged transaction. As a result, any gains or losses on the hedging instrument arising from changes in fair values are not recognised in the profit and loss account immediately but are accounted for in the same manner as the hedged item. |
| 2002 Unrecognised gains and losses £m |
2002 Deferred gains and losses £m |
2001 Unrecognised gains and losses £m |
2001 Deferred gains and losses £m |
||||||
| At 1 January – gains | 1,201 | 148 | 759 | 124 | |||||
| At 1 January – losses | (1,329 | ) | (64 | ) | (725 | ) | (35 | ) | |
| (128 | ) | 84 | 34 | 89 | |||||
| Recognised gains that arose in previous periods | (307 | ) | (35 | ) | (161 | ) | (18 | ) | |
| Recognised losses that arose in previous periods | 322 | 22 | 194 | 7 | |||||
| Unrecognised gains and losses arising in the period | 585 | - | (189 | ) | - | ||||
| Unrecognised gains and losses deferred in the period | (212 | ) | 212 | (6 | ) | 6 | |||
| Unrecognised
gains and losses deferred and taken to profit and loss in the period |
- | (42 | ) | - | - | ||||
| At 31 December | 260 | 241 | (128 | ) | 84 | ||||
| Of which – gains | 2,535 | 285 | 1,201 | 148 | |||||
| Of which – losses | (2,275 | ) | (44 | ) | (1,329 | ) | (64 | ) | |
| 260 | 241 | (128 | ) | 84 | |||||
| Gains
expected to be recognised in the year to 31 December 2003 (year to 31 December 2002) |
601 | 72 | 273 | 35 | |||||
| Gains
expected to be recognised in the year to 31 December 2004 or later (year to 31 December 2003 or later) |
1,934 | 213 | 928 | 113 | |||||
| 2,535 | 285 | 1,201 | 148 | ||||||
| Losses
expected to be recognised in the year to 31 December 2003 (year to 31 December 2002) |
(541 | ) | (12 | ) | (310 | ) | (22 | ) | |
| Losses
expected to be recognised in the year to 31 December 2004 or later (year to 31 December 2003 or later) |
(1,734 | ) | (32 | ) | (1,019 | ) | (42 | ) | |
| (2,275 | ) | (44 | ) | (1,329 | ) | (64 | ) | ||
| During the year to 31 December 2002, gains of £33 million (2001 – nil) and losses of £16 million (2001 – nil) arising in previous periods were taken directly to the profit and loss account on financial instruments no longer accounted for as hedges. |
| 41 |
Memorandum items Contingent liabilities and commitments The amounts shown in the table below are intended only to provide an indication of the volume of business outstanding at 31 December. Although the Group is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance of the obligations undertaken by customers, the amounts shown do not, and are not intended to, provide any indication of the Group’s expectation of future losses. |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||
| Contingent liabilities: | |||
| Acceptances and endorsements | 2,407 | 2,814 | |
| Guarantees and assets pledged as collateral security | 5,200 | 4,653 | |
| Other contingent liabilities | 7,981 | 6,106 | |
| 15,588 | 13,573 | ||
| Commitments: | |||
| Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions | 655 | 2,107 | |
| Undrawn formal standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments to lend | |||
| – less than one year | 87,645 | 93,324 | |
| – one year and over | 39,784 | 29,502 | |
| Other commitments | 508 | 338 | |
| 128,592 | 125,271 | ||
page 137
| Banking commitments and contingent obligations, which have been entered into on behalf of customers and for which there are corresponding obligations from customers, are not included in assets and liabilities. The Group’s maximum exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the other party and where all counterclaims, collateral or security proves valueless, is represented by the contractual nominal amount of these instruments included in the table above. These commitments and contingent obligations are subject to the Group’s normal credit approval processes and any potential loss is taken into account in assessing provisions for bad and doubtful debts in accordance with the Group’s provisioning policy. |
| Contingent
liabilities Acceptances – in accepting a bill of exchange drawn on it by a customer a bank undertakes to pay the holder of the bill at maturity. Most acceptances are presented for payment and reimbursement by the customer is usually immediate. In the UK, bills accepted by certain banks designated by the Bank of England are eligible for rediscount at the Bank of England. |
| Endorsements – in endorsing a bill of exchange a bank accepts liability for payment of any shortfall on the bill at maturity. Unlike acceptances, the endorsing bank receives value for the bill, which is then rediscounted. |
| Guarantees – the Group gives guarantees on behalf of customers. A financial guarantee represents an irrevocable undertaking that the Group will meet a customer’s obligations to third parties if the customer fails to do so. The maximum amount that the Group could be required to pay under a guarantee is its principal amount as disclosed in the table above. The Group expects most guarantees it provides to expire unused. |
| Other contingent liabilities – these include standby letters of credit, supporting customer debt issues and contingent liabilities relating to customer trading activities such as those arising from performance and customs bonds, warranties and indemnities. |
| Commitments Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions – documentary letters are commercial letters of credit providing for payment by the Group to a named beneficiary against presentation of specified documents. |
| Commitments to lend – under a loan commitment the Group agrees to make funds available to a customer in the future. Loan commitments, which are usually for a specified term may be unconditionally cancellable or may persist, provided all conditions in the loan facility are satisfied or waived. Commitments to lend include commercial standby facilities and credit lines, liquidity facilities to commercial paper conduits and unutilised overdraft facilities. |
| Other commitments – these include forward asset purchases, forward forward deposits placed and undrawn note issuance and revolving underwriting facilities. |
| Additional contingent liabilities arise in the normal course of the Group’s business. It is not anticipated that any material loss will arise from these transactions. |
| Litigation Members of the Group are engaged in litigation in the United Kingdom and a number of overseas jurisdictions, including the United States, involving claims by and against them which arise in the ordinary course of business. The directors of the company, after reviewing the actual, threatened and known potential claims against Group undertakings and taking into account the advice of the relevant legal advisers, are satisfied that the outcome of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on the net assets of the Group. |
| page 138 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 42 |
Acquisitions The Group made a number of acquisitions during the year, all of which were accounted for using acquisition accounting principles. The most significant of these were: |
| • | Dixon Motors PLC acquired by Lombard North Central PLC in May 2002 for a consideration of £118 million. |
| • | Medford Bancorp Inc. acquired in October 2002 by Citizens for a cash consideration of $273 million. |
| The provisional fair values of the assets and liabilities of all acquisitions made during the year and the consideration paid are shown in the table below: |
| At respective dates of acquisition | Book
value of net assets acquired £m |
Fair
value adjustments £m |
Fair
value to the Group £m |
||||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 20 | - | 20 | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks | 255 | - | 255 | ||||
| Loans and advances to customers | 427 | (20 | ) | 407 | |||
| Debt securities | 297 | 7 | 304 | ||||
| Equity shares | 8 | - | 8 | ||||
| Intangible fixed assets | 5 | (5 | ) | - | |||
| Tangible fixed assets | 66 | (2 | ) | 64 | |||
| Other assets | 154 | (17 | ) | 137 | |||
| Subsidiary held for resale | 15 | (12 | ) | 3 | |||
| Deposits by banks | (161 | ) | - | (161 | ) | ||
| Customer accounts | (750 | ) | (4 | ) | (754 | ) | |
| Other liabilities | (203 | ) | (18 | ) | (221 | ) | |
| Net assets acquired | 133 | (71 | ) | 62 | |||
| Goodwill | 362 | ||||||
| Total consideration | 424 | ||||||
| Satisfied by: | |||||||
| Payment of cash | 381 | ||||||
| Loan notes | 9 | ||||||
| Fees and expenses relating to the acquisition | 34 | ||||||
| 424 | |||||||
| Fair value adjustments reflect the restatement of balances to their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, and the related tax effect. |
page 139
| 43 | Reconciliation of operating profit to net cash inflow from operating activities |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Operating profit | 4,763 | 4,252 | 2,970 | ||||
| (Increase)/decrease in prepayments and accrued income | (657 | ) | 486 | (1,122 | ) | ||
| Interest on subordinated liabilities | 659 | 674 | 687 | ||||
| Increase in accruals and deferred income | 856 | 490 | 2,044 | ||||
| Amortisation of and provisions against investment securities | 99 | 39 | (7 | ) | |||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | 1,286 | 984 | 550 | ||||
| Loans and advances written off net of recoveries | (973 | ) | (755 | ) | (607 | ) | |
| Profit on sale of tangible fixed assets | (32 | ) | (55 | ) | (12 | ) | |
| Profit on sale of subsidiaries and associates | (13 | ) | - | - | |||
| (Profit)/loss from associated undertakings | (2 | ) | 6 | (1 | ) | ||
| Profit on sale of investment securities | (85 | ) | (48 | ) | (345 | ) | |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 50 | 67 | 41 | ||||
| Provisions utilised | (57 | ) | (37 | ) | (76 | ) | |
| Depreciation and amortisation of tangible and intangible fixed assets | 1,626 | 1,532 | 1,258 | ||||
| (Increase)/decrease in value of long-term assurance business | (61 | ) | (55 | ) | 39 | ||
| Net cash inflow from trading activities | 7,459 | 7,580 | 5,419 | ||||
| Decrease/(increase) in items in the course of collection | 547 | (327 | ) | 1,134 | |||
| (Increase)/decrease in treasury and other eligible bills | (1,323 | ) | (6,796 | ) | 343 | ||
| (Increase)/decrease in loans and advances to banks | (2,756 | ) | (4,785 | ) | 9,720 | ||
| Increase in loans and advances to customers | (32,670 | ) | (18,038 | ) | (22,014 | ) | |
| Decrease/(increase) in securities | 1,799 | 760 | (1,013 | ) | |||
| Decrease/(increase) in other assets | 615 | (3,327 | ) | (1,886 | ) | ||
| (Decrease)/increase in items in the course of transmission | (851 | ) | 402 | (948 | ) | ||
| Increase in deposits by banks | 14,512 | 4,604 | 1,329 | ||||
| Increase in customer accounts | 19,383 | 11,584 | 24,338 | ||||
| Increase/(decrease) in debt securities in issue | 3,269 | 11,262 | (2,840 | ) | |||
| Increase in other liabilities | 2,597 | 4,271 | (3,959 | ) | |||
| Effect of other accruals/deferrals and other non-cash movements | 1,156 | 97 | (626 | ) | |||
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 13,737 | 7,287 | 8,997 | ||||
| 44 | Analysis of the net outflow of cash in respect of the purchase of businesses and subsidiary undertakings |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Cash consideration paid | (415 | ) | (1,770 | ) | (8,396 | ) | |
| Cash acquired | 107 | 156 | 5,465 | ||||
| Net outflow of cash | (308 | ) | (1,614 | ) | (2,931 | ) | |
| page 140 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 45 | Sale of subsidiary and associated undertakings |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Net assets disposed of | 16 | 8 | 1,158 | ||||
| Profit on disposal | 13 | - | - | ||||
| Net inflow of cash in respect of disposals (net of expenses) | 29 | 8 | 1,158 | ||||
| 46 | Analysis of changes in financing during the year |
| Share
capital (including share premium) |
Loan capital | ||||||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||||||||
| At beginning of period | 8,358 | 7,378 | 2,381 | 12,530 | 10,436 | 3,006 | |||||||
| Currency translation adjustments | (283 | ) | 58 | 159 | (520 | ) | 82 | 382 | |||||
| Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing | (515 | ) | 2,412 | 4,381 | 1,955 | 2,012 | 148 | ||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary undertakings | - | - | 391 | - | - | 6,900 | |||||||
| Amount credited to merger reserve | - | (2,007 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||
| Other non-cash movements | 802 | 517 | 66 | - | - | - | |||||||
| At 31 December | 8,362 | 8,358 | 7,378 | 13,965 | 12,530 | 10,436 | |||||||
| 47 | Analysis of cash |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 3,481 | 3,093 | 3,049 | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks repayable on demand | 6,792 | 3,934 | 7,578 | ||||
| Cash | 10,273 | 7,027 | 10,627 | ||||
| Certain subsidiary undertakings are required to maintain balances with the Bank of England which, at 31 December 2002, amounted to £211 million (2001 – £188 million). Certain subsidiary undertakings are required by law to maintain reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank in the US. Such reserve balances amounted to US$205 million at 31 December 2002 (2001 – US$489 million). |
| 48 | Analysis of changes in cash during the year |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| At 1 January | 7,027 | 10,627 | 6,018 | ||||
| Net cash inflow/(outflow) | 3,246 | (3,600 | ) | 4,609 | |||
| At 31 December | 10,273 | 7,027 | 10,627 | ||||
page 141
| 49 |
Segmental analysis In the tables below, the analyses of net assets are included in compliance with Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 25 ‘Segmental Reporting’. The fungible nature of liabilities within the banking industry results in allocations of liabilities which, in some cases, are necessarily subjective. The directors believe that it is more meaningful to analyse total assets and the result of this analysis is therefore also included in the tables. |
| The prior year data in the table below have been restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002 and the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. In addition, the divisional data have been restated following the transfer of Ulster Bank’s leasing business to Corporate Banking and Financial Markets with effect from 1 January 2002. |
| a) | Classes of business |
| 2002 | Net interest income £m |
Non-interest income £m |
Total income £m |
Operating expenses and other operating charges £m |
Provisions* £m |
Profit/ |
|||||||
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets | 2,349 | 3,703 | 6,052 | (2,124 | ) | (725 | ) | 3,203 | |||||
| Retail Banking | 2,840 | 1,353 | 4,193 | (961 | ) | (213 | ) | 3,019 | |||||
| Retail Direct | 749 | 841 | 1,590 | (608 | ) | (281 | ) | 701 | |||||
| Manufacturing | - | - | - | (1,682 | ) | - | (1,682 | ) | |||||
| Wealth Management | 460 | 447 | 907 | (486 | ) | 11 | 432 | ||||||
| Direct Line Group | 158 | 1,981 | 2,139 | (1,784 | ) | - | 355 | ||||||
| Ulster Bank | 339 | 181 | 520 | (254 | ) | (22 | ) | 244 | |||||
| Citizens | 1,248 | 468 | 1,716 | (855 | ) | (95 | ) | 766 | |||||
| Central items | (294 | ) | (8 | ) | (302 | ) | (265 | ) | (20 | ) | (587 | ) | |
| Profit
before goodwill amortisation and integration costs |
7,849 | 8,966 | 16,815 | (9,019 | ) | (1,345 | ) | 6,451 | |||||
| Goodwill amortisation | - | - | - | (731 | ) | - | (731 | ) | |||||
| Integration costs | - | - | - | (957 | ) | - | (957 | ) | |||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 7,849 | 8,966 | 16,815 | (10,707 | ) | (1,345 | ) | 4,763 | |||||
| 2001 | |||||||||||||
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets | 2,138 | 3,319 | 5,457 | (1,931 | ) | (502 | ) | 3,024 | |||||
| Retail Banking | 2,622 | 1,277 | 3,899 | (928 | ) | (164 | ) | 2,807 | |||||
| Retail Direct | 674 | 696 | 1,370 | (564 | ) | (255 | ) | 551 | |||||
| Manufacturing | - | - | - | (1,568 | ) | - | (1,568 | ) | |||||
| Wealth Management | 464 | 469 | 933 | (479 | ) | 5 | 459 | ||||||
| Direct Line Group | 129 | 1,414 | 1,543 | (1,282 | ) | - | 261 | ||||||
| Ulster Bank | 313 | 170 | 483 | (239 | ) | (15 | ) | 229 | |||||
| Citizens | 814 | 306 | 1,120 | (550 | ) | (69 | ) | 501 | |||||
| Central items | (308 | ) | 61 | (247 | ) | (248 | ) | 9 | (486 | ) | |||
| Profit
before goodwill amortisation and integration costs |
6,846 | 7,712 | 14,558 | (7,789 | ) | (991 | ) | 5,778 | |||||
| Goodwill amortisation | - | - | - | (651 | ) | - | (651 | ) | |||||
| Integration costs | - | - | - | (875 | ) | - | (875 | ) | |||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 6,846 | 7,712 | 14,558 | (9,315 | ) | (991 | ) | 4,252 | |||||
| 2000 | |||||||||||||
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets | 1,612 | 2,510 | 4,122 | (1,485 | ) | (206 | ) | 2,431 | |||||
| Retail Banking | 2,109 | 961 | 3,070 | (828 | ) | (126 | ) | 2,116 | |||||
| Retail Direct | 473 | 501 | 974 | (427 | ) | (206 | ) | 341 | |||||
| Manufacturing | - | - | - | (1,426 | ) | - | (1,426 | ) | |||||
| Wealth Management | 373 | 395 | 768 | (419 | ) | 5 | 354 | ||||||
| Direct Line Group | 98 | 1,028 | 1,126 | (925 | ) | - | 201 | ||||||
| Ulster Bank | 216 | 132 | 348 | (184 | ) | (9 | ) | 155 | |||||
| Citizens | 667 | 247 | 914 | (525 | ) | (40 | ) | 349 | |||||
| Central items | (262 | ) | (65 | ) | (327 | ) | (288 | ) | (10 | ) | (625 | ) | |
| Profit
before goodwill amortisation and integration costs |
5,286 | 5,709 | 10,995 | (6,507 | ) | (592 | ) | 3,896 | |||||
| Goodwill amortisation | - | - | - | (537 | ) | - | (537 | ) | |||||
| Integration costs | - | - | - | (389 | ) | - | (389 | ) | |||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 5,286 | 5,709 | 10,995 | (7,433 | ) | (592 | ) | 2,970 | |||||
| * | Comprises provisions for bad and doubtful debts and amounts written off fixed asset investments. |
| page 142 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 49 | Segmental analysis (continued) |
| Total assets | Net assets | ||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
||
| Corporate Banking and Financial Markets | 245,225 | 216,574 | 10,434 | 8,813 | |
| Retail Banking | 66,095 | 61,054 | 3,418 | 3,144 | |
| Retail Direct | 19,846 | 17,158 | 1,072 | 891 | |
| Manufacturing | 3,929 | 3,323 | 193 | 176 | |
| Wealth Management | 13,441 | 12,511 | 615 | 561 | |
| Direct Line Group | 4,410 | 3,475 | 912 | 779 | |
| Ulster Bank | 12,713 | 10,782 | 976 | 927 | |
| Citizens | 37,858 | 36,195 | 3,510 | 3,600 | |
| Central items | 8,483 | 7,787 | 5,922 | 7,777 | |
| 412,000 | 368,859 | 27,052 | 26,668 | ||
| (b) | Geographical
segments The geographical analyses in the tables below have been compiled on the basis of location of office where the transactions are recorded. |
| 2002 | UK £m |
USA £m |
Rest
of the World £m |
Total £m |
|
| Interest receivable | 10,372 | 2,240 | 949 | 13,561 | |
| Dividend income | 32 | 10 | 16 | 58 | |
| Fees and commissions receivable | 4,434 | 601 | 273 | 5,308 | |
| Dealing profits | 736 | 649 | 77 | 1,462 | |
| Other operating income | 1,156 | 28 | 25 | 1,209 | |
| General insurance premium income (net of reinsurance) | 1,815 | - | 79 | 1,894 | |
| Gross income | 18,545 | 3,528 | 1,419 | 23,492 | |
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 3,840 | 620 | 303 | 4,763 | |
| Total assets | 280,390 | 102,582 | 29,028 | 412,000 | |
| Net assets | 21,038 | 4,086 | 1,928 | 27,052 | |
| 2001 | |||||
| Interest receivable | 11,360 | 1,816 | 1,245 | 14,421 | |
| Dividend income | 28 | 9 | 17 | 54 | |
| Fees and commissions receivable | 4,079 | 412 | 244 | 4,735 | |
| Dealing profits | 816 | 532 | 78 | 1,426 | |
| Other operating income | 1,039 | 6 | 7 | 1,052 | |
| General insurance premium income (net of reinsurance) | 1,364 | - | 11 | 1,375 | |
| Gross income | 18,686 | 2,775 | 1,602 | 23,063 | |
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 3,270 | 628 | 354 | 4,252 | |
| Total assets | 243,382 | 99,082 | 26,395 | 368,859 | |
| Net assets | 21,392 | 4,170 | 1,106 | 26,668 | |
page 143
| 2000 | UK £m |
USA £m |
Rest
of the World £m |
Total £m |
||
| Interest receivable | 10,097 | 2,083 | 1,038 | 13,218 | ||
| Dividend income | 21 | 10 | 13 | 44 | ||
| Fees and commissions receivable | 3,135 | 284 | 195 | 3,614 | ||
| Dealing profits | 652 | 237 | 44 | 933 | ||
| Other operating income | 841 | 37 | (4 | ) | 874 | |
| General insurance premium income (net of reinsurance) | 950 | - | - | 950 | ||
| Gross income | 15,696 | 2,651 | 1,286 | 19,633 | ||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 2,451 | 197 | 322 | 2,970 | ||
| Total assets | 229,840 | 68,007 | 22,222 | 320,069 | ||
| Net assets | 19,920 | 2,002 | 1,077 | 22,999 | ||
| 50 | Directors' emoluments |
| 2002 £000 |
2001 £000 |
|||
| Non-executive directors – emoluments | 716 | 625 | ||
| Chairman and executive directors | – emoluments | 12,286 | 7,879 | |
| – contributions and allowances in respect of defined contribution pension schemes |
153 | 102 | ||
| 13,155 | 8,606 | |||
| – amounts receivable under long-term incentive plan | 546 | - | ||
| – gains on exercise of share options | 16 | 4,849 | ||
| 13,717 | 13,455 | |||
| Retirement benefits are accruing to six directors (2001 – six) under defined benefit schemes, two (2001 – two) of whom also accrued benefits under defined contribution schemes. |
| The emoluments of the highest paid director, Mr Fish (2001 – Sir George Mathewson), were as follows: |
| 2002 £000 |
2001 £000 |
||
| Aggregate emoluments including long-term cash incentive and shadow equity plans | 3,898 | 483 | |
| Gains on exercise of share options | - | 3,607 | |
| $000 | $000 | ||
| Pension contributions | 90 | - | |
| Defined benefit pension scheme – accrued pension at end of year (per annum) | - | ||
| – Qualified plan | 30 | - | |
| – Excess plan | 224 | - | |
| – Employee arrangement | 389 | - | |
| The executive directors may also participate in the company’s executive share option, sharesave and option 2000 schemes and details of their interests in the company’s shares arising from their participation are contained on pages 87. Details of the remuneration received by each director during the year and each directors’ pension arrangements are given on pages 86 to 89. |
| 51 (a) |
Transactions with directors, officers and
others At 31 December 2002, the amounts outstanding in relation to transactions, arrangements and agreements entered into by authorised institutions in the Group were £36,640,014 in respect of loans to twelve persons who were directors of the company (or persons connected with them) at any time during the financial period and £35,149 to one person who was an officer of the company at any time during the financial period. |
| (b) | There were no contracts of significance to the business of the company and its subsidiaries which subsisted at 31 December 2002, or during the year then ended, in which any director of the company had a material interest. |
| page 144 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 52 |
Related party transactions Subsidiary undertakings Details of the principal subsidiary undertakings are shown in Note 18. In accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 8 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ (“FRS8”) , transactions or balances between Group entities that have been eliminated on consolidation are not reported. |
| Associated undertakings Details of the Group’s principal associated undertakings are shown in Note 17. The amounts of loans and advances due from associated undertakings at 31 December 2002 are shown in Notes 11 and 12, and the amounts of deposits received from associated undertakings as at 31 December 2002 are shown in Note 25. These transactions are conducted on similar terms to third party transactions and are not material to the Group’s results or financial condition. Certain subsidiary undertakings in the Group provide development and other types of capital support to businesses in their roles as providers of finance. These investments are made in the normal course of business and on arm’s-length terms depending on their nature. In some instances, the investment may extend to ownership or control over 20% or more of the voting rights of the investee company. However, these investments are not considered to give rise to transactions of a materiality requiring disclosure under FRS 8. |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Pension Fund (the “Scheme”) The Group recharges the Scheme with the cost of administration services incurred by it. The amounts involved are not material to the Group. |
| Santander Central Hispano, S.A. In October 1988, the Group and Banco Santander entered into an agreement whereby the Group and Banco Santander and its subsidiaries agreed to co-operate in certain banking and financial services activities in Europe, including representation in each other’s bank branches to service their respective customers, offshore and investment banking, technology development, operational co-operation and the development of representation in Europe and the Far East. In April 1999, Banco Santander merged with Banco Central Hispanoamericano, another Spanish banking group and the merged entity is now called Santander Central Hispano, S.A. (“SCH”). |
| Under the terms of the alliance agreement, the Group and SCH co-operate in certain banking and financial activities in Europe. The Group holds 2.83% of SCH’s capital stock and SCH holds 5.04% of the company’s ordinary shares. |
| Directors, officers and others Details of directors’ emoluments are set out in Note 50 and the Remuneration Report on pages 80 to 89. Details of transactions with directors, officers and others connected to them are shown in Note 51. |
| 53 |
Significant differences between UK and US
generally accepted accounting principles The consolidated financial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with UK generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) that differ in certain material respects from US GAAP. The significant differences are summarised as follows: |
| (a) | Acquisition accounting Under UK GAAP, all integration costs relating to acquisitions are expensed as post-acquisition expenses. Under US GAAP, certain restructuring costs and exit costs incurred in the acquired business are treated as liabilities assumed on acquisition and taken into account in the calculation of goodwill. |
| The fair value of the surplus on pension schemes is restricted under UK GAAP to the amount expected to be realised by way of reduced contributions or refunds. Under US GAAP, the full surplus is recognised as a fair value adjustment. |
| Under US GAAP, the consideration for the acquisition includes the value of certain options granted to holders of options over the acquired entity’s shares under employee share option schemes. |
| Under UK GAAP, provisional fair value adjustments made in the accounting year in which the acquisition occurs may be amended in the subsequent accounting year. Under US GAAP, the allocation of the cost of acquisition to the fair values of assets and liabilities is generally completed within 12 months of the date of acquisition. |
| (b) | Goodwill Under the Group’s UK GAAP accounting policy, goodwill arising on acquisitions after 1 October 1998 is recognised as an asset and amortised on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful economic life. Impairment tests on goodwill are carried out at the end of the first full accounting period after its acquisition, and whenever there are indications of impairment. Goodwill arising on acquisitions before 1 October 1998 was deducted from reserves immediately. Under US GAAP, goodwill is recognised as an asset, and is not amortised. Under the transition rules of SFAS 142 ‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’, no amortisation is charged on acquisitions made after 30 June 2001; amortisation is charged up to 31 December 2001 for other goodwill. All goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. Certain amounts included in goodwill under UK GAAP are classified as intangible assets under US GAAP and amortised over their useful economic life. |
| (c) | Property revaluation The Group’s freehold and leasehold properties are carried at original cost or subsequent valuation. The surplus or deficit on revaluation is included in the Group’s reserves. Under US GAAP, revaluations of property are not permitted to be reflected in the financial statements. |
page 145
| (d) | Property depreciation Depreciation charged under UK GAAP is based on the revalued amount of freehold and long leasehold properties; no depreciation is charged on investment properties. Under US GAAP, the depreciation charge is based on the historical cost of all properties. |
| (e) | Dividends Under UK GAAP, dividends are recorded in the period to which they relate, whereas under US GAAP dividends are recorded in the period in which they are declared. |
| (f) | Loan origination fees Certain loan fees are recognised when received. Under US GAAP, all loan fees and certain direct costs are deferred and recognised as an adjustment to the yield on the related loan or facility. |
| (g) | Pension costs Pension costs, based on actuarial assumptions and methods, are charged in the consolidated accounts so as to allocate the cost of providing benefits over the service lives of employees in a consistent manner approved by the actuary. US GAAP prescribes the method of actuarial valuation and also requires assets to be assessed at fair value and the assessment of liabilities to be based on current interest rates. Additionally, under US GAAP a minimum additional liability must be recognised if the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets and the Group has recorded a prepaid pension cost or has an accrued liability that is less than the unfunded accumulated benefit. This minimum additional liability represents the underfunding of the fund on an accumulated benefit obligation basis, together with an amount equal to the pension pre-payment. Movements in the minimum additional liability, together with the related deferred tax, are recognised through other comprehensive income as a deduction from equity. |
| (h) | Long-term assurance business The shareholders’ interest in the long-term assurance fund is valued as the discounted value of the cash flows expected to be generated from in-force policies together with net assets in excess of the statutory liabilities. Under US GAAP, for traditional business, premiums are recognised as revenue when due from the policyholders. Costs of claims are recognised when insured events occur. A liability for future policy benefits is established based upon the present value of future benefits less the present value of future net premiums. Acquisition costs for traditional business contracts are charged to the profit and loss account in proportion to premium revenue recognised. For unit-linked business, premiums and front-end load-type charges receivable from customers and acquisition costs relating to the acquisition of new contracts are capitalised and depreciated in proportion to the present value of estimated gross profits. Costs of claims are recognised when insured events occur. |
| (i) | Leasing In accordance with UK GAAP, the Group’s accounting policy for finance lease income receivable is to allocate total gross earnings to accounting periods so as to give a constant periodic rate of return on the net cash investment, and certain operating lease assets are depreciated on a reverse-annuity basis. Under US GAAP, finance lease income is recognised so as to give a level rate of return on the investment in the lease but without taking into account the associated tax flows, and all operating lease assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis. |
| (j) | Debt securities and equity shares Under UK GAAP, the Group’s investments in debt securities and equity shares are classified as being held as investment securities, held for the purpose of hedging or held for dealing purposes. Investment securities are stated at cost less provision for any permanent diminution in value. Premiums and discounts on dated securities are amortised to interest income over the period to maturity. Under US GAAP, the Group’s investment debt securities and marketable investment equity shares are classified as available-for-sale securities with unrealised gains and losses reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. |
| (k) | Derivatives and hedging activities SFAS 133 ‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’ was effective for the Group’s US GAAP information from 1 January 2001. The Group has not made changes in its use of non-trading derivatives to meet the hedge criteria of SFAS 133. As a result, from 1 January 2001, for US GAAP purposes, the Group’s portfolio of non-trading derivatives has been remeasured to fair value and changes in fair value reflected in net income. Under UK GAAP, these derivatives continue to be classified as non-trading and accounted for in accordance with the underlying transaction or transactions. SFAS 133 does not permit non-derivative financial instruments to be designated as the hedging instrument in a fair value hedge of the foreign exchange exposure of available-for-sale securities. The Group’s UK and US GAAP reconciliations also reflect transition adjustments on initial application of SFAS 133. These adjustments were: a cumulative-effect-type adjustment increasing net income by £45 million (£65 million less tax of £20 million); and a cumulative-effect-type adjustment decreasing other comprehensive income by £51 million (£73 million less tax of £22 million). SFAS 133 also requires derivatives embedded in other financial instruments to be accounted for on a stand-alone basis if they have economic characteristics and risks that differ from those of the host instrument. |
| (l) | Software development costs Under UK GAAP, most software development costs are written off as incurred. Under US GAAP, certain costs relating to software developed for own use that are incurred after 1 January 1999 are capitalised and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the software. |
| (m) | Acceptances Acceptances outstanding and the matching customers’ liabilities are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet, but are disclosed as memorandum items. Under US GAAP, acceptances outstanding and the matching customers’ liabilities are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. |
| page 146 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 53 (n) |
Significant
differences between UK and US generally accepted accounting principles
(continued) Offset of repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements Under UK GAAP, debit and credit balances with the same counterparty are aggregated into a single item where there is a right to insist on net settlement and the debit balance matures no later than the credit balance. Under US GAAP, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements with the same counterparty may be offset only where they have the same settlement date specified at inception. |
| (o) | Deferred taxation Following the implementation by the Group of FRS 19 ‘Deferred Tax’, accounting for deferred tax under UK GAAP is now consistent with US GAAP except that deferred tax is not recognised under UK GAAP on certain timing differences resulting from the roll-over of gains on disposal of properties, but is provided under US GAAP on such differences. |
| (p) | Perpetual regulatory securities Under UK GAAP, the Group’s perpetual regulatory securities are classified as liabilities. Under US GAAP, they are classified as equity instruments. |
| Recent developments in USGAAP In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 145 ‘Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections’. SFAS 145 rescinds existing requirements for accounting for extinguishments of debt, removes an inconsistency in the existing requirements for accounting by lessees for certain lease amendments, and makes other technical corrections to existing statements. The Group has determined that this Statement has no material effect on its US GAAP reporting. |
| In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146 ‘Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities’. SFAS 146 addresses the recognition and measurement of employee termination costs, contract termination costs and other costs associated with exit or disposal activities, and related disclosures. SFAS 146 is applicable to exit and disposal activities initiated after 31 December 2002. The Group is reviewing this statement to determine the effect on its US GAAP reporting. |
| In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 147 ‘Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions’. SFAS 147 requires certain acquisitions that fell within the scope of SFAS 72 ‘Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions’ to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141 ‘Business Combinations’, and includes transitional provisions to deal with unidentified intangible assets recognised under SFAS 72. SFAS 147 is effective from 1 October 2002. The Group has determined that this Statement has no material effect on its US GAAP reporting. |
| In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ‘Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34’. FIN 45 requires guarantees entered into or modified after 31 December 2002 to be recognised and measured initially at their fair value. The Group is reviewing the initial recognition and measurement requirements of this Statement to assess their effect on the US GAAP reporting. |
| In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148 ‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123'. SFAS 148 addresses the treatment of a voluntary change in accounting for stock-based employee compensation from the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25 ‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’, to the fair-value based method under SFAS 123. The Group is currently not contemplating moving to accounting for stock-based compensation using the fair-value based method of SFAS 123. |
| In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ‘Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51’. FIN 46 addresses accounting for variable interest entities, which are entities where the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without subordinated support from other parties to absorb losses, or where the equity investors lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity. An enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity if it holds an interest that will absorb the majority of its expected losses or receive a majority of its expected residual returns. FIN 46 requires the holder of a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity to make certain disclosures. The requirements of FIN 46 apply to new variable interest entities created after 31 January 2003, or where the reporting entity acquires an interest after that date, and to other variable interest entities in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after 15 June 2003. |
| However, FIN 46 requires disclosures in financial statements issued after 31 January 2003 about variable interest entities that, when FIN 46 becomes effective, it is reasonably possible that the reporting enterprise will consolidate or about which the enterprise will disclose information in accordance with FIN 46. The Group has undertaken a review to identify variable interest entities in which it is the primary beneficiary or in which it has a significant variable interest. The Group has concluded that it is reasonably possible that it is the primary beneficiary of, or has a significant interest in, a number of commercial paper conduits and other asset securitisation vehicles that meet FIN 46’s definition of a variable interest entity. These entities acquire financial assets from third parties or from the Group funded by the issue of commercial paper or other debt instruments. The Group supplies certain administrative services and provides credit enhancement, liquidity facilities and derivative transactions to some or all of the entities on an arm’s length basis. In the case of the commercial paper conduits, the Group provides programme wide credit enhancement by letters of credit or loan facilities across all tranches of assets funded by conduits. The Group provides |
page 147
| funding in the form of reverse repurchase agreements on bonds owned by one variable interest entity. At 31 December 2002, the Group held loan notes issued by these entities with a principal amount of £19 million, had outstanding undrawn liquidity lines amounting to £3.6 billion; and total rate of return swaps with a notional amount of £0.7 billion. The Group’s maximum exposure to loss, in the event of non-performance of the entire portfolios of assets in these entities and if all counterclaims proved valueless, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. |
| As experience with FIN 46 develops, the Group is continuing to review its existing interests to identify other variable interest entities in which the Group may have a significant variable interest or of which the Group may be the primary beneficiary. |
| Selected
figures in accordance with US GAAP The following tables summarise the significant adjustments to consolidated net income available for ordinary shareholders and shareholders’ equity which would result from the application of US GAAP instead of UK GAAP. Where applicable, the adjustments are stated gross of tax with the tax effect shown separately in total. |
| Consolidated statement of income | 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders – UK GAAP | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | ||||
| Adjustments in respect of: | |||||||
| Acquisition accounting | - | (113 | ) | 311 | |||
| Amortisation of goodwill | 681 | (48 | ) | (46 | ) | ||
| Property depreciation | (18 | ) | (13 | ) | 5 | ||
| Property disposals | - | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Loan fees and costs | (72 | ) | (95 | ) | (71 | ) | |
| Pension costs | (58 | ) | 242 | 167 | |||
| Long-term assurance business | (37 | ) | (25 | ) | 104 | ||
| Leasing | (71 | ) | (68 | ) | (25 | ) | |
| Derivatives and hedging | 770 | (125 | ) | 71 | |||
| Software development costs | 283 | 442 | 235 | ||||
| Tax effect on the above adjustments | (261 | ) | (44 | ) | (214 | ) | |
| Deferred taxation | (80 | ) | 40 | (9 | ) | ||
| Net income available for ordinary shareholders – US GAAP | 3,108 | 2,062 | 2,102 | ||||
| Consolidated shareholders’ equity | 2002 £m |
2001* £m |
|||
| Shareholders’ funds – UK GAAP | 27,052 | 26,668 | |||
| Adjustments in respect of: | |||||
| Acquisition accounting | 418 | 418 | |||
| Goodwill | 1,541 | 860 | |||
| Property revaluation and depreciation | (277 | ) | (292 | ) | |
| Proposed dividend | 899 | 772 | |||
| Loan fees and costs | (241 | ) | (169 | ) | |
| Pension costs | 342 | 400 | |||
| Recognition of pension scheme minimum liability | (3,568 | ) | - | ||
| Long-term assurance business | (121 | ) | (84 | ) | |
| Leasing | (165 | ) | (94 | ) | |
| Available-for-sale securities | 284 | 272 | |||
| Derivatives and hedging | 535 | (112 | ) | ||
| Perpetual regulatory tier one securities | 751 | 835 | |||
| Software development costs | 960 | 677 | |||
| Tax effect on cumulative UK/US GAAP adjustments | (461 | ) | (200 | ) | |
| Tax effect on other comprehensive income | 1,013 | (74 | ) | ||
| Deferred tax | (34 | ) | 46 | ||
| Shareholders’ equity – US GAAP | 28,928 | 29,923 | |||
| * | restated for the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| Total assets under US GAAP, adjusted to reflect the inclusion of acceptances and the grossing-up of certain repurchase agreements offset under UK GAAP, together with the effect of adjustments made to net income and shareholders’ funds, were £431 billion (2001 – £387 billion). |
| page 148 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 53 |
Significant differences between UK and US
generally accepted accounting principles (continued) Earnings per share Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) under US GAAP differs from UK GAAP only to the extent that the income calculated under US GAAP differs from that under UK GAAP. |
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
| Income* £m |
No.
of shares million |
Per
share amount pence |
Income* £m |
No.
of shares million |
Per
share amount pence |
Income* £m |
No.
of shares million |
Per
share amount pence |
|||||
| Basic EPS | 3,108 | 2,881 | 107.9 | 2,062 | 2,762 | 74.7 | 2,102 | 2,348 | 89.5 | ||||
| Dilutive
effect of share options outstanding |
- | 43 | (1.6 | ) | - | 55 | (1.5 | ) | - | 28 | (1.0 | ) | |
| Diluted EPS | 3,108 | 2,924 | 106.3 | 2,062 | 2,817 | 73.2 | 2,102 | 2,376 | 88.5 | ||||
| * | US GAAP net income available to ordinary shareholders, see page 147. |
| Convertible preference shares totalling £200 million (2001 and 2000 – £800 million), €750 million (2001 and 2000 – €750 million) and $1,900 million (2001 and 2000 – $1,900 million) have not been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect is anti-dilutive. Interest payments on the $1,200 million (2001 – $1,200 million) perpetual regulatory securities may be settled by the issue of ordinary shares at the option of the company and have not been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect is also anti-dilutive. |
| Outstanding options to purchase shares are excluded from the computation of diluted EPS where the exercise prices of the options are greater than the average market price of the ordinary shares during the relevant period. At 31 December 2002, 2001 and 2000 there were no such options outstanding. |
| Pensions On 1 April 2002, the Group’s main pension schemes, The Royal Bank of Scotland Staff Pension Scheme and the National Westminster Bank Pension Fund, were merged to form The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Pension Fund (“the plan”). The provisions of SFAS 87 ‘Employers’ Accounting for Pensions’ have been applied to the plan, which covers most of the Group’s UK employees; the impact of US GAAP on the other Group schemes is considered to be immaterial. A trust fund has been established under the plan, to which payments are made, determined on an actuarial basis, designed to build up reserves during the working life of full-time employees to pay such employees or dependents a pension after retirement. Such pensions are based on final pensionable salaries and are related to the length of service prior to retirement. Pensions are limited to a maximum of two-thirds of final salary for 40 years service or more. Staff do not make contributions for basic pensions but may make voluntary contributions on a regular basis to purchase additional service qualification where less than 40 years service will have been completed by normal retirement age. The assets of the plan are held under separate trusts and, in the long-term, the funding policy is to maintain assets sufficient to cover the benefits in respect of service to date, with due allowance for future earnings increases. The plan assets consist mainly of fixed-income securities and listed securities. The investment policy followed for the plan seeks to deploy the plan assets primarily in UK and overseas equity shares and UK government securities. |
| The net periodic pension cost of the plan under US GAAP was: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Service cost component | 303 | 236 | 242 | ||||
| Interest cost component | 715 | 647 | 544 | ||||
| Expected return on assets | (901 | ) | (956 | ) | (826 | ) | |
| Amortisation of net transition asset | (8 | ) | (8 | ) | (8 | ) | |
| Amortisation of prior service cost | 1 | - | - | ||||
| Amortisation of loss/(gain) | 138 | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | ||
| Net periodic pension cost/(credit) | 248 | (87 | ) | (52 | ) | ||
| The following table presents the estimated funded status and prepaid pension cost of the plans under US GAAP: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Market value of plan assets | 10,682 | 12,567 | 13,846 | ||||
| Projected benefit obligation | 12,526 | 12,198 | 10,573 | ||||
| Funded status | (1,844 | ) | 369 | 3,273 | |||
| Unrecognised prior service cost | 14 | 15 | 2 | ||||
| Unrecognised net loss | 5,266 | 3,199 | 147 | ||||
| Unrecognised transition amount | (22 | ) | (30 | ) | (38 | ) | |
| Prepaid pension cost at year end | 3,414 | 3,553 | 3,384 | ||||
page 149
| The following table shows the estimated changes in projected benefit obligation and fair value of fund assets of the plan under US GAAP. |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Change in benefit obligation: | |||||||
| Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year | 12,198 | 10,573 | 1,765 | ||||
| Acquisition of NatWest | - | - | 8,556 | ||||
| Service cost | 303 | 236 | 242 | ||||
| Interest cost | 715 | 647 | 544 | ||||
| Amendments | - | 14 | - | ||||
| Actuarial (gain)/loss | (217 | ) | 1,257 | (165 | ) | ||
| Benefits paid | (473 | ) | (529 | ) | (369 | ) | |
| Projected benefit obligation at year end | 12,526 | 12,198 | 10,573 | ||||
| Change in plan assets: | |||||||
| Market value of plan assets at beginning of year | 12,567 | 13,846 | 2,319 | ||||
| Acquisition of NatWest | - | - | 11,816 | ||||
| Actual return on plan assets | (1,521 | ) | (833 | ) | 9 | ||
| Employer contribution | 109 | 83 | 76 | ||||
| Benefits and expenses paid | (473 | ) | (529 | ) | (374 | ) | |
| Market value of plan assets at year end | 10,682 | 12,567 | 13,846 | ||||
| Weighted average assumptions at measurement date | 2002 % per annum |
2001 % per annum |
2000 % per annum |
||||
| Discount rate | 5.75 | 6.0 | 6.25 | ||||
| Salary increases | 3.5 | 4.25 | 4.0 | ||||
| Long-term rate of return on plan assets | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.0 | ||||
| Pension increases | 2.25 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||||
| At 31 December 2002, the fund’s accumulated benefit obligation was underfunded by £168 million. This has resulted in a reduction in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of US GAAP shareholders’ equity of £3,568 million, comprising the excess of the accumulated benefit obligation over the market value of assets of £168 million, prepaid pension cost of £3,414 million less unrecognised prior service cost of £14 million. This has been reduced by deferred tax of £1,070 million. At 31 December 2001, the fund had a surplus of assets over its accumulated benefit obligation and no minimum liability was recognised. |
| page 150 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 53 |
Significant differences between UK and US
generally accepted accounting principles (continued) Loan impairment With effect from 1 October 1995, the Group adopted SFAS 114 ‘Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan’ and the subsequent amendment SFAS 118 ‘Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – Income Recognition and Disclosures’ for US GAAP purposes. SFAS 114 applies to impaired loans only. Under SFAS 114, a loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impaired loans is primarily based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except for collateral dependent loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the collateral. Smaller balance homogeneous consumer loans, (credit card advances, residential mortgages, consumer instalment loans, overdrafts), that are collectively evaluated for impairment, leases and debt securities are outside the scope of SFAS 114. |
| At 31 December 2002 and 2001, the Group estimated that the difference between the carrying value of its loan portfolio under SFAS 114 and its value in the Group’s UK GAAP financial statements was such that no adjustment to net income or consolidated shareholders’ equity was required. |
| At 31 December 2002, the Group’s non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days and troubled debt restructurings amounted to £4,871 million (2001 – £4,493 million). Specific provisions of £2,435 million (2001 – £2,413 million) were held against these loans. Average non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days and troubled debt restructurings for the year to 31 December 2002 were £4,762 million (2001 – £4,120 million). |
| Gross interest income not recognised, but which would have been recognised under the original terms of non-accrual and restructured loans, amounted to £234 million for the year ended 31 December 2002 (2001 – £173 million; 2000 – £148 million) from domestic loans and £73 million for the year ended 31December 2002 (2001 – £60 million; 2000 – £48 million) from foreign loans. Interest on non-accrual and restructured loans included in net income was £47 million for the year ended 31 December 2002 (2001 – £42 million; 2000 – £30 million) from domestic loans and £7million for the year ended 31 December 2002 (2001 – £14 million; 2000 – £8 million) from foreign loans. |
| Cash
flow statements There are many similarities between SFAS 95, ‘Statement of Cash Flows’ as amended by SFAS 104 ‘Statement of Cash Flows – Net Reporting of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and Classification of Cash Flows from Hedging Transactions’, and FRS 1 ‘Cash Flow Statements’ (Revised). The principal differences are the classifications of certain transactions. |
| Classification under FRS 1 | Classification under SFAS 95 | ||
| Dividends received | Returns
on investment and servicing of finance |
Operating activities | |
| Equity dividends paid | Equity dividends paid | Financing activities | |
| Dividends paid on non-equity shares | Returns
on investment and servicing of finance |
Financing activities | |
| Tax paid | Taxation | Operating activities | |
| Purchase
and sale of associated and subsidiary undertakings |
Acquisitions and disposals | Investing activities | |
| Purchase
and sale of investment securities and fixed assets |
Capital
expenditure and financial investment |
Investing activities | |
| Net
change in loans and advances, including finance lease receivables |
Operating activities | Investing activities | |
| Net change in deposits | Operating activities | Financing activities | |
| Net change in debt securities in issue | Operating activities | Financing activities | |
| Short-term funding not included in cash | Operating activities | Financing activities | |
| Under FRS 1, transactions designated as hedges are reported under the same heading as the related assets or liabilities. |
| The composition of cash at 31 December 2002, 31 December 2001 and 31 December 2000 and the movement in cash for the years then ended are shown in Note 47 and Note 48 on the accounts respectively. |
page 151
| Stock-based
compensation costs The Group grants share options to executive officers under an executive share option scheme (the “executive scheme”) and to employees under a savings-related sharesave scheme (the “savings scheme”) and the option 2000 scheme. |
| Executive scheme Under the terms of the executive scheme, senior management employees and executive directors of Group companies may participate in the executive scheme at the discretion of the Board of directors of the company. The executive scheme involves a participant being granted an option to subscribe for ordinary shares of the company at the higher of nominal value and market value of ordinary shares on the date of grant. Normally, options may be granted only within six weeks after an announcement of final or interim results of the Group for any particular year. Options may not be transferred or assigned. A participant may not be granted options over new shares to the extent that the aggregate subscription price would exceed four times his compensation. Options granted under the executive scheme are issued on a UK Inland Revenue approved or unapproved basis. Options are issued with exercise prices equal to market price at the date of grant and are exercisable between the third and tenth anniversaries of the grant date, only if performance criteria are met. For options granted from 1996 to 1998, the criterion is that for the average growth in adjusted earnings per ordinary share to exceed the average increase in the UK Retail Prices Index by 2% per annum over a three year period. For options granted since 1999, the relevant percentage has been increased to 3% per annum. |
| Savings scheme Under the terms of the savings scheme, employees of Group companies employed in the UK and certain offshore jurisdictions are offered participation in the savings scheme. The savings scheme requires the participants to make monthly savings, under a save-as-you-earn contract (the “savings contract”), for a period of three or five years, of amounts between £5 and £250 per month. Options may be granted at not less than 80% of the average market value of ordinary shares of the company by reference to dealings in the ordinary shares over the last three trading days of the week immediately preceding the date of an invitation to participate, or, if higher, at par. Options comprise, as nearly as possible, such number of ordinary shares as may be purchased at the option price with the proceeds on maturity after either three, five or seven years of the savings contract, and options may normally be exercised only within six months after the third, fifth or seventh anniversary of the savings contract. Options may not be transferred or assigned and may be granted only within six weeks after an announcement of final or interim results of the Group for any particular year. |
| Option 2000 scheme On 9 August 2000 and again on 4 April 2001, every qualifying permanent member of staff in the Group received an option over 150 shares in the company. The executive directors of the company waived their entitlement to the option granted on 4 April 2001. On 21 March 2002, further options over 150 shares were granted to all employees of Mellon who transferred to Citizens Financial Group on the acquisition by Citizens of the retail and commercial banking business of Mellon. |
| Under the scheme, options are granted at the market value of ordinary shares at the date of grant and may normally be exercised only between the third and sixth anniversary of the date of grant. |
(i) |
Limitations
of the option schemes: During a ten year period, no more than 10% in aggregate of the issued ordinary share capital of the company from time to time may be issued pursuant to all of the employee share schemes operated by the company. |
| (ii) | During a five year period, no more than 5% in aggregate of the issued ordinary share capital of the company from time to time may be issued pursuant to all of the employee share schemes operated by the company. |
| (iii) | During a ten year period, no more than 5% in aggregate of the issued ordinary share capital of the company from time to time may be issued pursuant to the executive scheme. |
| (iv) | During a four year period, no more than 2½% in aggregate of the issued ordinary share capital of the company from time to time may be issued pursuant to the executive scheme. |
| (v) | During a three year period, no more than 3% in aggregate of the issued ordinary share capital of the company from time to time may be issued pursuant to the executive scheme. |
| page 152 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 53 |
Significant differences between UK and US
generally accepted accounting principles (continued) The following is a summary of outstanding options under the various schemes: |
Savings
scheme
|
Executive
scheme
|
Option
2000 scheme
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Number of options 000’s |
Weighted average exercise price pence |
Number of options 000’s |
Weighted average exercise price pence |
Number of options 000’s |
Weighted |
Number of options 000’s |
Weighted average exercise price pence |
||||||
| At 1 January 2000 | 20,636 | 588 | 5,525 | 723 | - | - | 26,161 | 617 | |||||
| Granted | 14,693 | 985 | 2,576 | 1151 | 14,898 | 1240 | 32,167 | 1010 | |||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary | 42,289 | 696 | 12,705 | 629 | - | - | 54,994 | 681 | |||||
| Additional grants relating to AVSs* | 5,693 | n/a | 1,388 | n/a | - | - | 7,081 | n/a | |||||
| Exercised | (19,725 | ) |
349 | (6,161 | ) |
612 | - | - | (25,886 | ) |
411 | ||
| Forfeited | (4,745 | ) |
431 | (236 | ) |
823 | (22 | ) |
1240 | (5,003 | ) |
450 | |
| At 31 December 2000 | 58,841 | 666 | 15,797 | 768 | 14,876 | 1240 | 89,514 | 779 | |||||
| Granted | 9,581 | 1364 | 1,941 | 1714 | 13,412 | 1563 | 24,934 | 1498 | |||||
| Exercised | (13,465 | ) |
427 | (5,217 | ) |
599 | (1 | ) |
1240 | (18,683 | ) |
475 | |
| Forfeited | (3,353 | ) |
1112 | (488 | ) |
715 | (1,703 | ) |
1302 | (5,544 | ) |
1135 | |
| At 31 December 2001 | 51,604 | 829 | 12,033 | 996 | 26,584 | 1399 | 90,221 | 1019 | |||||
| Granted | 12,419 | 1235 | 2,096 | 1810 | 620 | 1841 | 15,135 | 1339 | |||||
| Exercised | (12,112 | ) |
493 | (3,160 | ) |
729 | (5 | ) |
1380 | (15,277 | ) |
542 | |
| Forfeited | (2,271 | ) |
1025 | (145 | ) |
940 | (1,313 | ) |
1419 | (3,729 | ) |
1160 | |
| At 31 December 2002 | 49,640 | 1003 | 10,824 | 1232 | 25,886 | 1409 | 86,350 | 1153 | |||||
| * | As a result of the bonus issue of Additional Value Shares to all ordinary shareholders in July 2000, the number of options in issue was increased to compensate option holders for the dilution that would have occurred to their existing options. The exercise price of all options was reduced so that the total exercise cost of options held remained the same. |
| The following table shows options outstanding by normal exercise date. An option life of 5 years, being the midpoint on the 10-year option, has been assumed for options granted under Group and former NatWest executive plans. |
| 2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||
| Year exercisable | Number
of options 000’s |
Weighted average exercise price pence |
Number
of options 000’s |
Weighted average exercise price pence |
Number
of options 000’s |
Weighted average exercise price pence |
|
| 2001 | - | - | - | - | 16,383 | 420 | |
| 2002 | - | - | 14,500 | 475 | 14,764 | 512 | |
| 2003 | 27,769 | 963 | 28,238 | 987 | 33,068 | 983 | |
| 2004 | 25,553 | 1226 | 28,498 | 1215 | 13,127 | 798 | |
| 2005 | 15,473 | 1118 | 10,320 | 1012 | 10,912 | 1015 | |
| 2006 | 6,924 | 1447 | 7,237 | 1443 | 308 | 1006 | |
| 2007 | 9,265 | 1343 | 874 | 985 | 952 | 985 | |
| 2008 | 494 | 1364 | 554 | 1364 | - | - | |
| 2009 | 872 | 1235 | - | - | - | - | |
| Total | 86,350 | 1153 | 90,221 | 1019 | 89,514 | 779 | |
page 153
| If the compensation cost for the schemes had been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates consistent with the fair value method of by SFAS 123, net income and earnings per share as adjusted to include stock compensation would have been as shown below: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Net income under US GAAP: | |||||||
| As reported | 3,108 | 2,062 | 2,102 | ||||
| Adjusted to include stock compensation | 2,978 | 1,942 | 2,018 | ||||
| Basic earnings per share under US GAAP: | |||||||
| As reported | 107.9 | p | 74.7 | p | 89.5 | p | |
| Adjusted to include stock compensation | 103.4 | p | 70.3 | p | 85.9 | p | |
| Diluted earnings per share under US GAAP: | |||||||
| As reported | 106.3 | p | 73.2 | p | 88.5 | p | |
| Adjusted to include stock compensation | 101.8 | p | 68.9 | p | 84.9 | p | |
| The fair value of each option has been estimated as at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
||
| Risk free interest rate | 4.7%-4.9% | 5.0% | 5.1%-5.4% | |
| Volatility based on historical data | 43% | 42% | 48% | |
| Dividend yield | 2.4%-2.9% | 1.9%-2.2% | 2.2%-3.7% | |
| Expected lives of options granted under: | ||||
| Employee savings scheme | 3, 5 and 7 years | 3, 5 and 7 years | 3, 5 and 7 years | |
| Executive scheme | 3 to 10 years | 3 to 10 years | 3 to 10 years | |
| Option 2000 scheme | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | |
| The following table summarises fair values of options issued in each year: |
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||
| Exercise price £ |
Fair
value £ |
Life Years |
Exercise price £ |
Fair
value £ |
Life Years |
Exercise price £ |
Fair
value £ |
Life Years |
||
| Executive scheme (1) | 18.10 | 6.54 | 3-10 | 17.14 | 6.40 | 3-10 | 11.51 | 4.55 | 3-10 | |
| Savings scheme | ||||||||||
| 3 year | 12.35 | 5.58 | 3 | 13.64 | 6.47 | 3 | 9.85 | 4.95 | 3 | |
| 5 year | 12.35 | 6.33 | 5 | 13.64 | 7.48 | 5 | 9.85 | 5.66 | 5 | |
| 7 year | 12.35 | 6.76 | 7 | 13.64 | 8.15 | 7 | 9.85 | 6.10 | 7 | |
| Option 2000 scheme | 18.41 | 5.44 | 3 | 15.63 | 4.63 | 3 | 12.40 | 4.06 | 3 | |
| Former NatWest schemes | ||||||||||
| Executive scheme (1) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.35 | 3.90 | 3.4 | |
| Savings scheme | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.96 | 3.20 | 2.0 | |
(1) |
Note: For the purposes of calculating a fair value on executive scheme options, an option life of 5 years, being the mid-point on the 10 year option, has been assumed. Historical exercise trends have not been used as these are not felt to be indicative of future trends given changes to the scheme rules and participants in the scheme. |
| page 154 | Notes on the accounts continued |
| 53 |
Significant differences between UK and US
generally accepted accounting principles (continued) Goodwill and other intangible assets The Group has fully implemented SFAS 142 ‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’, with effect from 1 January 2002. Under this standard, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortised and are subject to annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets continue to be amortised over their useful lives. The Group has completed the impairment tests required under SFAS 142 and no impairment has been recognised as a result. |
| The table below sets out reported net income reconciled to net income adjusted to comply with SFAS 142. |
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
|||||
| Net income under US GAAP | 3,108 | 2,062 | 2,102 | ||||
| Goodwill amortisation | - | 657 | 539 | ||||
| Adjusted net income | 3,108 | 2,719 | 2,641 | ||||
| Basic earnings per share under US GAAP | 107.9 | p | 74.7 | p | 89.5 | p | |
| Goodwill amortisation | - | 23.7 | p | 23.0 | p | ||
| Adjusted basic earnings per share | 107.9 | p | 98.4 | p | 112.5 | p | |
| Diluted earnings per share under US GAAP | 106.3 | p | 73.2 | p | 88.5 | p | |
| Goodwill amortisation | - | 23.3 | p | 22.7 | p | ||
| Adjusted diluted earnings per share | 106.3 | p | 96.5 | p | 111.2 | p | |
page 155
| Five year financial summary |
| Summary
financial data The financial information set out below for each of the three years ended 31 December 2002, the three months ended 31 December 1999 and each of the two years ended 30 September 1999, has been selected from the audited accounts of the Group for those periods or, where certain items are not shown in those audited accounts, has been prepared for the purpose of this document. The information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, the accounts for the three years ended 31 December 2002 and the three months ended 31 December 1999 audited by independent chartered accountants, Deloitte & Touche and for the two years ended 30 September 1999, which have been audited by independent chartered accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The dollar financial information included below has been translated for convenience at the rate of £1.00 to US$1.6095, the Noon Buying Rate on 31 December 2002. |
| The Group’s accounts are prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which differs in certain material respects from US GAAP. For a discussion of such differences and a reconciliation between UK GAAP and US GAAP, see Note 53 on the accounts. |
| Summary consolidated profit and loss account |
| Year ended 31 December | 3
months ended 31 December 1999 £m |
Year
ended 30 September |
||||||||
| 2002 $m |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
1998 £m |
|||||
| Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP(1): | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | 12,633 | 7,849 | 6,846 | 5,286 | 501 | 1,748 | 1,592 | |||
| Non-interest income (3) | 14,431 | 8,966 | 7,712 | 5,709 | 612 | 2,354 | 2,099 | |||
| Total income | 27,064 | 16,815 | 14,558 | 10,995 | 1,113 | 4,102 | 3,691 | |||
| Operating
expenses excluding goodwill amortisation (2) |
13,883 | 8,626 | 7,716 | 6,223 | 542 | 2,021 | 1,864 | |||
| Goodwill amortisation | 1,177 | 731 | 651 | 537 | 4 | 1 | - | |||
| General insurance claims (net) | 2,173 | 1,350 | 948 | 673 | 185 | 590 | 518 | |||
| Profit before provisions | 9,831 | 6,108 | 5,243 | 3,562 | 382 | 1,490 | 1,309 | |||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts (3) | 2,070 | 1,286 | 984 | 550 | 79 | 266 | 328 | |||
| Amounts written off fixed asset investments (3) | 95 | 59 | 7 | 42 | - | 13 | 24 | |||
| Write-down of finance leases (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | |||
| Operating profit | 7,666 | 4,763 | 4,252 | 2,970 | 303 | 1,211 | 944 | |||
| Exceptional items (4) | - | - | - | - | 100 | - | 57 | |||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 7,666 | 4,763 | 4,252 | 2,970 | 403 | 1,211 | 1,001 | |||
| Tax on profit on ordinary activities | 2,504 | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,054 | 123 | 364 | 268 | |||
| Profit on ordinary activities after tax | 5,162 | 3,207 | 2,715 | 1,916 | 280 | 847 | 733 | |||
| Minority interests (including non-equity) | 214 | 133 | 90 | 50 | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | 20 | |
| Preference dividends – non-equity | 491 | 305 | 358 | 294 | 28 | 80 | 58 | |||
| 4,457 | 2,769 | 2,267 | 1,572 | 255 | 773 | 655 | ||||
| Additional Value Shares dividend – non-equity | 1,285 | 798 | 399 | - | - | - | - | |||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 3,172 | 1,971 | 1,868 | 1,572 | 255 | 773 | 655 | |||
| Amounts in accordance withUS GAAP: | ||||||||||
| Net income available for ordinary shareholders | 5,002 | 3,108 | 2,062 | 2,102 | 239 | 678 | 539 | |||
(1) |
Notes: All prior periods have been restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. The year ended 31 December 2001 has also been restated following the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| (2) | Includes integration expenditure of £957 million for the year ended 31 December 2002 (2001 – £875 million; 2000 – £389 million; 3 months ended 31 December 1999 – £12 million). |
| (3) | In the year ended 30 September 1998, £96 million gain on the investment in Superdiplo, £132 million of provisions for bad and doubtful debts and £14 million of amounts written off fixed asset investments in respect of exposures in the Far East and £13 million write-down of finance leases were treated as exceptional items. |
| (4) | In the three months ended 31 December 1999, an exceptional gain of £100 million (tax charge £31 million) was realised from the sale of the investor services business. In the year ended 30 September 1998, a gain of £57 million was realised from the sale of investment securities. |
| page 156 | Five year financial summary continued |
| Summary
financial data (continued) Preference and other non-equity dividends |
| Year ended 31 December | 3
months ended 31 December 1999 £ |
Year
ended 30 September |
||||||
| Amount per share | 2002 $ |
2002 £ |
2001 £ |
2000 £ |
1999 £ |
1998 £ |
||
| Non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 | ||||||||
| – Series B (1) | 2.52 | 1.65 | 1.73 | 1.67 | 0.39 | 1.45 | 1.32 | |
| – Series C (1) | 2.14 | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.41 | 0.33 | 1.23 | 1.12 | |
| – Series D | 2.05 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.35 | 0.32 | 1.18 | 1.08 | |
| – Series E | 2.03 | 1.32 | 1.40 | 1.33 | 0.31 | 1.16 | 1.06 | |
| – Series F | 1.91 | 1.25 | 1.31 | 1.26 | 0.30 | 1.10 | 1.00 | |
| – Series G | 1.85 | 1.21 | 1.27 | 1.22 | 0.29 | 1.12 | 0.69 | |
| – Series H | 1.81 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 0.28 | 0.71 | - | |
| – Series I | 2.00 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.32 | 0.31 | 0.20 | - | |
| – Series J | 2.13 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 0.33 | - | - | |
| – Series K | 1.97 | 1.29 | 0.74 | - | - | - | - | |
| Non-cumulative
convertible preference shares of US$0.01 |
||||||||
| – Series 1 | 91.18 | 59.15 | 62.70 | 50.22 | - | - | - | |
| – Series 2 | 88.17 | 57.20 | 60.63 | 48.57 | - | - | - | |
| – Series 3 | 78.16 | 49.81 | 53.74 | 5.24 | - | - | - | |
| Non-cumulative
convertible preference shares of €0.01 |
||||||||
| – Series 1 | 71.54 | 44.45 | 41.34 | 34.55 | - | - | - | |
| Non-cumulative
convertible preference shares of £0.01 |
||||||||
| – Series 1 | 118.89 | 73.87 | 73.87 | 3.28 | - | - | - | |
| Non-cumulative
convertible preference shares of £0.25 (2) |
- | - | 0.08 | 0.07 | - | - | - | |
| Additional Value Shares of £0.01 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.15 | - | - | - | - | |
| Ordinary dividends | ||||||||
| Year ended 31 December | 3
months ended 31 December 1999 pence |
Year
ended 30 September |
||||||
| Amount per share | 2002 cents |
2002 pence |
2001 pence |
2000 pence |
1999 pence |
1998 pence |
||
| Interim | 20.4 | 12.7 | 11.0 | 9.5 | - | 8.2 | 7.13 | |
| Proposed final | 49.9 | 31.0 | 27.0 | 23.5 | - | 20.3 | 17.47 | |
| Total dividends on equity shares | 70.3 | 43.7 | 38.0 | 33.0 | - | 28.5 | 24.60 | |
(1) |
Notes: Redeemed on 30 January 2003. |
| (2) | Redeemed in January 2002. |
| For further information, see Notes 6 and 7 on the accounts. |
page 157
| Summary consolidated balance sheet |
31
December
|
30
September
|
||||||
| 2002 $m |
2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
1998 £m |
||
| |
|||||||
| Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP(1): | |||||||
| Loans and advances to banks (net of provisions) | 71,294 | 44,296 | 38,513 | 32,061 | 10,375 | 11,514 | |
| Loans and advances to customers (net of provisions) | 359,440 | 223,324 | 190,492 | 168,076 | 49,340 | 41,017 | |
| Debt securities and equity shares | 110,940 | 68,928 | 65,597 | 59,342 | 16,302 | 13,631 | |
| Intangible fixed assets | 20,436 | 12,697 | 13,325 | 12,080 | 11 | - | |
| Other assets | 101,004 | 62,755 | 60,932 | 48,510 | 12,892 | 13,591 | |
| |
|||||||
| Total assets | 663,114 | 412,000 | 368,859 | 320,069 | 88,920 | 79,753 | |
| Called up share capital | 1,214 | 754 | 893 | 848 | 224 | 220 | |
| Share premium account | 12,245 | 7,608 | 7,465 | 6,530 | 2,130 | 1,458 | |
| Other reserves | 19,188 | 11,922 | 12,354 | 12,835 | 164 | 103 | |
| Profit and loss account | 10,893 | 6,768 | 5,956 | 2,786 | 1,587 | 1,078 | |
| |
|||||||
| Shareholders’ funds | 43,540 | 27,052 | 26,668 | 22,999 | 4,105 | 2,859 | |
| Minority interests | 2,960 | 1,839 | 585 | 546 | 146 | 92 | |
| Subordinated liabilities | 22,477 | 13,965 | 12,530 | 10,436 | 3,032 | 2,611 | |
| |
|||||||
| Total capital resources | 68,977 | 42,856 | 39,783 | 33,981 | 7,283 | 5,562 | |
| Deposits by banks | 88,072 | 54,720 | 40,038 | 35,130 | 6,418 | 4,437 | |
| Customer accounts | 352,740 | 219,161 | 198,995 | 177,302 | 55,180 | 50,685 | |
| Debt securities in issue | 54,623 | 33,938 | 30,669 | 19,407 | 9,199 | 7,459 | |
| Other liabilities | 98,702 | 61,325 | 59,374 | 54,249 | 10,840 | 11,610 | |
| |
|||||||
| Total liabilities | 663,114 | 412,000 | 368,859 | 320,069 | 88,920 | 79,753 | |
| Amounts in accordance with US GAAP: | |||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 46,560 | 28,928 | 29,923 | 25,423 | 5,099 | 4,006 | |
| Total assets | 693,007 | 430,573 | 386,696 | 323,731 | 90,623 | 81,802 | |
(1) |
Note: All prior years have been restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. The balance sheet at 31 December 2001 has also been restated following the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| page 158 | Five year financial summary continued |
| Summary
financial data (continued) Other financial data |
Year
ended 31 December
|
3
months ended 31 December 1999 |
Year
ended 30 September
|
||||||||||||
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||
| Other
financial data in accordance with UK GAAP(1): |
||||||||||||||
| Earnings
per ordinary share - pence |
68.4 |
67.6 |
66.9 |
28.6 |
87.5 |
75.5 |
||||||||
| Diluted
earnings per ordinary share - pence (2) |
67.4 |
66.3 |
66.2 |
28.1 |
86.3 |
74.4 |
||||||||
Adjusted
earnings per ordinary share - pence |
144.1 |
127.9 |
101.2 |
22.2 |
87.5 |
74.4 |
||||||||
| Dividends
per ordinary share - pence |
43.7 |
38.0 |
33.0 |
- |
28.5 |
24.6 |
||||||||
| Dividend
payout ratio |
64.3 |
% |
58.1 |
% |
56.1 |
% |
- |
32.9 |
% |
32.8 |
% |
|||
| Share
price per ordinary share at period end - £ (3) |
14.88 |
16.72 |
15.82 |
10.98 |
13.03 |
6.70 |
|
|||||||
| Market
capitalisation at period end - £bn |
43.2 |
47.8 |
42.4 |
9.8 |
11.6 |
5.9 |
|
|||||||
| Net
asset value per ordinary share - £ |
8.12 |
7.79 |
7.08 |
3.35 |
3.09 |
2.31 |
|
|||||||
| Return
on average total assets (4) |
0.50 |
% |
0.53 |
% |
0.58 |
% |
1.15 |
% |
0.92 |
% |
0.88 |
% |
||
| Return
on average ordinary shareholders’ equity (5) |
8.4 |
% |
8.9 |
% |
9.9 |
% |
34.1 |
% |
32.0 |
% |
28.0 |
% |
||
| Adjusted
return on average ordinary shareholders’ equity (6) |
17.6 |
% |
16.8 |
% |
14.9 |
% |
37.1 |
% |
33.2 |
% |
29.9 |
% |
||
| |
||||||||||||||
| Average
shareholders’ equity as a percentage of average total assets |
6.9 |
% |
7.2 |
% |
7.2 |
% |
4.8 |
% |
4.1 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
||
| Risk
asset ratio – Tier 1 |
7.3 |
% |
7.1 |
% |
6.9 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
8.1 |
% |
6.6 |
% |
||
|
– Total |
11.7 |
% |
11.5 |
% |
11.5 |
% |
11.2 |
% |
12.1 |
% |
11.2 |
% |
||
| Ratio
of earnings to combined fixed charges and preference share dividends (7) |
||||||||||||||
| -
including interest on deposits |
1.73 |
1.49 |
1.32 |
1.46 |
1.33 |
1.26 |
||||||||
| -
excluding interest on deposits |
5.12 |
4.45 |
3.49 |
4.77 |
3.99 |
3.81 |
||||||||
| Ratio
of earnings to fixed charges only (7) |
||||||||||||||
| -
including interest on deposits |
1.82 |
1.55 |
1.37 |
1.52 |
1.37 |
1.29 |
||||||||
| -
excluding interest on deposits |
7.13 |
6.52 |
4.81 |
6.63 |
5.06 |
4.84 |
||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||
| Other
financial data in accordance with US GAAP: |
||||||||||||||
| Basic
earnings per ordinary share - pence |
107.9 |
74.7 |
89.5 |
26.8 |
76.7 |
62.2 |
||||||||
| Diluted
earnings per ordinary share - pence (2) |
106.3 |
73.2 |
88.5 |
26.4 |
75.7 |
61.3 |
||||||||
| Dividends
per ordinary share - pence |
39.7 |
34.5 |
29.8 |
- |
25.7 |
22.3 |
||||||||
| Dividend
payout ratio |
36.7 |
% |
45.7 |
% |
20.6 |
% |
- |
33.5 |
% |
35.9 |
% |
|||
| Return
on average total assets (4) |
0.75 |
% |
0.57 |
% |
0.77 |
% |
0.27 |
% |
0.78 |
% |
0.71 |
% |
||
| Return
on average ordinary shareholders’ equity (5) |
12.1 |
% |
8.8 |
% |
12.0 |
% |
6.3 |
% |
19.9 |
% |
14.0 |
% |
||
| Average
shareholders’ equity as a percentage of average total assets |
7.3 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
5.7 |
% |
5.2 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
||
| Ratio
of earnings to combined fixed charges, preference share dividends and perpetual regulatory securities interest (7) |
||||||||||||||
| -
including interest on deposits |
1.97 |
1.51 |
1.41 |
1.45 |
1.31 |
1.24 |
||||||||
| -
excluding interest on deposits |
6.49 |
4.63 |
4.19 |
4.65 |
3.73 |
3.58 |
||||||||
| Ratio
of earnings to fixed charges only (7) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| -
including interest on deposits |
2.07 |
1.59 |
1.46 |
1.50 |
1.34 |
1.26 |
||||||||
| -
excluding interest on deposits |
9.03 |
6.98 |
5.77 |
6.46 |
4.73 |
4.55 |
||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||
(1) |
Notes: All prior periods have been restated, where appropriate, following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. The year ended 31 December 2001 has also been restated, where appropriate, following the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| (2) | Convertible preference shares totalling £200 million (2001 and 2000 – £800 million), €750 million (2001 and 2000 – €750 million) and $1,900 million (2001 and 2000 – $1,900 million) have not been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect is anti-dilutive. Interest payments on the $1,200 million (2001 – $1,200 million) perpetual regulatory securities may be settled by the issue of ordinary shares at the option of the company and have not been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect is also anti-dilutive. |
| (3) | The share prices at 31 December 1999, 30 September 1999 and 30 September 1998 have not been adjusted for the bonus issue in July 2000, of Additional Value Shares in connection with the acquisition of NatWest. |
| (4) | Return on average total assets represents profit attributable to ordinary shareholders as a percentage of average total assets. |
| (5) | Return on average ordinary shareholders’ equity represents profit attributable to ordinary shareholders expressed as a percentage of average ordinary shareholders’ equity. |
| (6) | Adjusted return on average ordinary shareholders’ equity represents profit attributable to ordinary shareholders before integration costs, goodwill amortisation and the AVS divided, expressed as a percentage of average ordinary shareholders’ equity. |
| (7) | For this purpose, earnings consist of income before tax and minority interests, plus fixed charges less the unremitted income of associated undertakings (share of profits less dividends received). Fixed charges consist of total interest expense, including or excluding interest on deposits and debt securities in issue, as appropriate, and the proportion of rental expense deemed representative of the interest factor (one third of total rental expenses). |
page 159
| Four-year financial summary - pro forma basis |
| Year ended 31 December | |||||||||
| 2002 £m |
2001 £m |
2000 £m |
1999 £m |
||||||
| Profit before provisions | 7,796 | 6,769 | 5,046 | 3,901 | |||||
| Provisions | 1,345 | 991 | 645 | 542 | |||||
| Profit before goodwill amortisation and integration costs | 6,451 | 5,778 | 4,401 | 3,359 | |||||
| Goodwill amortisation | 731 | 651 | 640 | 581 | |||||
| Integration costs | 957 | 875 | 434 | 113 | |||||
| Profit before tax | 4,763 | 4,252 | 3,327 | 2,665 | |||||
| Tax | 1,556 | 1,537 | 1,177 | 917 | |||||
| Profit after tax | 3,207 | 2,715 | 2,150 | 1,748 | |||||
| Adjusted earnings per ordinary share | 144.1 | p | 127.9 | p | 101.8 | p | 78.3 | p | |
| Cost:income ratio | 45.6 | % | 47.0 | % | 53.5 | % | 59.3 | % | |
(1) |
Notes: For the basis of preparation, see page 13. The year ended 31 December 2000 and 31 December 1999 are on a pro forma basis assuming the acquisition of NatWest occurred on 1 January 1999. |
| (2) | All prior periods have been restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. The year ended 31 December 2001 has also been restated following the issuance of UITF 33 in February 2002. |
| Exchange
rates Except as stated, the following tables show, for the dates or periods indicated, the Noon Buying Rate in New York for cable transfers in sterling as certified for customs’ purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Noon Buying Rate”): |
| US dollars per £1 | January 2003 |
December 2002 |
November 2002 |
October 2002 |
September 2002 |
August 2002 |
|
| Noon Buying Rate | |||||||
| High | 1.6482 | 1.6095 | 1.5915 | 1.5708 | 1.5700 | 1.5709 | |
| Low | 1.5975 | 1.5555 | 1.5440 | 1.5655 | 1.5343 | 1.5192 | |
| Year
ended 30 September |
|||||||
| Year ended 31 December | 3
months ended 31 December 1999 |
||||||
| US dollars per £1 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||
| Noon Buying Rate | |||||||
| Period end rate | 1.6095 | 1.4543 | 1.4955 | 1.6150 | 1.6457 | 1.6995 | |
| Average rate for the period (1) | 1.5043 | 1.4396 | 1.5204 | 1.6295 | 1.6286 | 1.6531 | |
| Consolidation rate (2) | |||||||
| Period end rate | 1.6128 | 1.4498 | 1.4925 | 1.6168 | 1.6465 | 1.7001 | |
| Average rate for the period | 1.5032 | 1.4401 | 1.5160 | 1.6308 | 1.6297 | 1.6536 | |
(1) |
Notes: The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month during the period. |
| (2) | The rates used by the Group for translating dollars into sterling in the preparation of its financial statements. |
| (3) | On 25 February 2003, the Noon Buying Rate was £1.00 = $1.5727. |
| page 160 | Five year financial summary continued |
| Derivation of unaudited pro forma consolidated profit and loss account – year ended 31 December 2000 |
| Statutory profit and loss account (i) £m |
Conforming period adjustments (ii) £m |
Notes
on page 161 |
Pro
forma adjustments £m |
Pro
forma profit and loss account (iii) £m |
|||||||
| Interest receivable | 14,494 | 155 | 5 | (23 | ) | 14,626 | |||||
| Interest payable | (8,707 | ) | (7 | ) | 4,5 | 17 | (8,697 | ) | |||
| Net interest income | 5,787 | 148 | (6 | ) | 5,929 | ||||||
| Dividend income | 54 | (2 | ) | 5 | (6 | ) | 46 | ||||
| Fees and commissions receivable | 3,885 | 235 | 5 | (41 | ) | 4,079 | |||||
| Fees and commissions payable | (746 | ) | (65 | ) | 5 | 7 | (804 | ) | |||
| Dealing profits | 1,003 | 121 | 5 | 7 | 1,131 | ||||||
| Other operating income | 959 | 41 | 5 | (2 | ) | 998 | |||||
| 5,155 | 330 | (35 | ) | 5,450 | |||||||
| General
insurance premium income – earned premiums |
1,608 | (262 | ) | - | 1,346 | ||||||
| – reinsurance | (442 | ) | 75 | - | (367 | ) | |||||
| Non-interest income | 6,321 | 143 | (35 | ) | 6,429 | ||||||
| Total income | 12,108 | 291 | (41 | ) | 12,358 | ||||||
| Administrative
expenses – staff costs |
(3,547 | ) | (222 | ) | 3,5,6 | 329 | (3,440 | ) | |||
| – premises and equipment | (817 | ) | (32 | ) | 5,6 | 10 | (839 | ) | |||
| – other | (1,615 | ) | (55 | ) | 5,6,8 | 104 | (1,566 | ) | |||
| Depreciation of tangible fixed assets | (786 | ) | (19 | ) | 5 | 36 | (769 | ) | |||
| Operating expenses | (6,765) | (328 | ) | 479 | (6,614 | ) | |||||
| Profit before other operating charges | 5,343 | (37 | ) | 438 | 5,744 | ||||||
| General
insurance claims – gross claims |
(1,205 | ) | 223 | - | (982 | ) | |||||
| – reinsurance | 347 | (63 | ) | - | 284 | ||||||
| Profit before provisions | 4,485 | 123 | 438 | 5,046 | |||||||
| Provisions for bad and doubtful debts | (629 | ) | 27 | - | (602 | ) | |||||
| Amounts written off investments | (42 | ) | (5 | ) | 5 | 4 | (43 | ) | |||
| Operating
profit before goodwill amortisation and integration costs |
3,814 | 145 | 442 | 4,401 | |||||||
| Goodwill amortisation | (541 | ) | (3 | ) | 2,5 | (96 | ) | (640 | ) | ||
| Integration costs | - | - | 6 | (434 | ) | (434 | ) | ||||
| Profit on disposal of businesses | 100 | (100 | ) | 5 | - | - | |||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 3,373 | 42 | (88 | ) | 3,327 | ||||||
| Tax on profit on ordinary activities | (1,178 | ) | (16 | ) | 3,4,5 | 17 | (1,177 | ) | |||
| Profit on ordinary activities after tax | 2,195 | 26 | (71 | ) | 2,150 | ||||||
| Minority interests | (47 | ) | (5 | ) | 7 | (2 | ) | (54 | ) | ||
| Profit for the financial period | 2,148 | 21 | (73 | ) | 2,096 | ||||||
| Preference dividends | (322 | ) | 22 | 4,7 | (28 | ) | (328 | ) | |||
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,826 | 43 | (101 | ) | 1,768 | ||||||
(i) |
Notes: This column represents the statutory consolidated profit and loss account of the Group for the 15 months ended 31 December 2000 as restated for the implementation of FRS 19 – see page 95. |
| (ii) | Conforming period adjustments are to arrive at the year ended 31 December 2000: |
| – to exclude the consolidated profit and loss account of the Group for the three months ended 31 December 1999 |
| – to include the consolidated profit and loss account of NatWest for the period from 1 January 2000 to the date of acquisition, 6 March 2000 |
| (iii) | This column represents the pro forma consolidated profit and loss account of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2000 as restated for the implementation of FRS 19 – see page 95. |
page 161
| Notes
to the derivation of unaudited pro forma consolidated profit and loss account The pro forma consolidated profit and loss account on page 160 incorporates the effect of the following: |
| 1 | It includes the results of NatWest from 1 January 2000 and assumes that the fair value adjustments were made on 31 December 1999. |
| 2 | Goodwill arising on the acquisition of NatWest, of £11,483 million, has been amortised over its estimated economic life of 20 years from 1 January 2000 resulting in goodwill amortisation of £574 million per annum. |
| Goodwill arising on other acquisitions made by the Group after 1 January 2000 has been amortised from the effective dates of acquisition, generally also over 20 years. Goodwill arising on acquisitions prior to 1 January 2000 was written off directly to reserves and has not been reinstated, as permitted by FRS 10. |
| 3 | A surplus of £1,070 million in NatWest Pension Funds has been amortised, from 1 January 2000, over the estimated average remaining service life of members of the schemes. The adjustment has been reflected in ‘Staff costs’. |
| 4 | An adjustment has been made to reflect the net funding of the acquisition of NatWest as if acquired on 1 January 2000. The net funding comprises cash paid and loan notes issued to NatWest shareholders of £7,349 million and fees and expenses relating to the acquisition of £176 million less net proceeds of £3,910 million from the issue of new ordinary and preference shares and £20 million of proceeds from the exercise of options over NatWest ordinary shares. The adjustment impacts ‘Interest payable’ and ‘Preference dividends’. |
| 5 | The results of businesses disposed of since 1 January 2000 and the profit arising on their sale have been excluded from the pro forma accounts. The principal disposals were RBS Trust Bank, Gartmore and the venture capital investments of NatWest. The dis-aggregation of the profits of these businesses are reflected across all captions, except minority interests and preference dividends, in the pro forma consolidated profit and loss account. A funding adjustment, impacting ‘Interest payable’, has been made to recognise the benefit of estimated net proceeds assuming that these funds were received on 1 January 2000. |
| 6 | All expenditure incurred to integrate the Group’s existing operations with those of NatWest and relating to projects and initiatives to achieve the cost reduction and income enhancement targets set in connection with the acquisition of NatWest have been eliminated from ‘Operating expenses’ and shown separately under the caption ‘Integration costs’. |
| 7 | Preference dividends of NatWest represent minority interests in the Group. |
| 8 | Bid defence costs incurred by NatWest, during the year ended 31 December 2000, have been excluded from the pro forma consolidated profit and loss account. |
| page 162 | Additional information |
| Economic
and monetary environment Monetary policy The Group’s earnings are affected by domestic and global economic conditions. The policies of the UK government, and of governments in other countries in which the Group operates, also have an impact. |
| The UK government sets an inflation target, which the Chancellor of the Exchequer confirmed in his April 2002 Budget would remain at 2.5%. The Bank of England has operational independence in setting short-term interest rates to achieve this target. The Bank was given independence by the Chancellor in 1997, with the aim of making monetary policy free from political influence, and therefore more stable and credible. The Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (“MPC”) meets each month to agree any change to interest rates, and the minutes of these meetings are published two weeks later. One-off meetings can also be held in exceptional circumstances – for example, when UK interest rates were cut by a quarter point following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001. In response to the downturn in the global economy and the terrorist attacks, the Bank of England, along with other major central banks around the world, cut rates sharply in 2001. Rates remained at exceptionally low levels throughout 2002, and were reduced again in February 2003, reflecting the uncertain nature of the global and domestic economic circumstances. |
| The value of sterling is also important for UK monetary conditions. The monetary authorities do not have an exchange rate target, but concerns over the strength of sterling have played a role in the MPC’s monthly debates in the past. A feature of recent months has been the sharp depreciation of the US dollar against the euro. In this context, sterling appreciated significantly against the dollar, while at the same time weakening against the euro. |
| European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) The new European single currency, the euro, came into being on 1 January 1999. The third stage of EMU started on schedule on 1 January 1999. During the course of 1998, it was determined that eleven countries (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain) would participate. The UK, along with Denmark, exercised its right to opt out at that stage, and Sweden also determined not to be part of this first wave. |
| On 31 December 1998, the European Currency Unit (the “ECU”) was replaced by the euro on the international currency markets, on a one-for-one basis. The rates for the euro against other international currencies were based upon the official closing rates for the ECU. The bilateral rates for the legacy currencies of the participating states were derived from their rates within the Exchange Rate Mechanism and the closing value of the ECU. These rates, between the legacy currencies and between these currencies and the euro, were fixed as of 1 January 1999. The euro became the formal currency for all eleven then participating states. |
| Euro notes and coins were introduced into circulation on 1 January 2002 in accordance with the Maastricht Treaty which required that legacy currency notes and coins be withdrawn by 30 June 2002. |
| Also on 1 January 1999, the European Central Bank (“ECB”) assumed responsibility for the operation of monetary policy throughout the euro zone. The ECB sets one short-term interest rate to cover all twelve countries. |
| The UK Government continues to indicate that it supports EMU entry in principle, but that the UK will not adopt the single currency until this is seen as being in the UK’s economic interests and also not until there has been a positive vote at a referendum. The Chancellor of the Exchequer has laid down five key economic conditions for UK participation and the Prime Minister has indicated that an assessment of these five tests will be undertaken within two years of the 2001 General Election, and therefore by 30 June 2003. |
| The Group continues to co-operate with the UK Government, and to work proactively within the financial sector, to develop thinking and plans regarding a range of practical issues that would arise if the UK were to determine to enter EMU. In particular, the Group is involved in discussions as to how a phased transition could be achieved, in order to minimise cost and risk. In addition, due attention is being paid to the implications, for elements of the Group and for customers, of the introduction of euro notes and coins and the withdrawal of legacy currencies. |
| There is considerable uncertainty on the likelihood and timing of the euro being introduced in the UK. It is not possible to estimate with any degree of certainty the ultimate cost of making systems and operations fully compliant. Expenditure in the year ended 31 December 2002 in preparation for the possible introduction of the euro in the UK was minimal. |
page 163
1 1.1 |
Supervision
and regulation United Kingdom The regulatory regime applying to the UK financial services industry The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA 2000”), containing a new integrated legislative framework for the regulation of most of the UK financial services industry, was implemented at the end of 2001 and the Financial Services Authority (the “FSA”) was established by the Government as the single statutory regulator responsible for the regulation of deposit taking, insurance and investment business in the UK. |
| Under the FSMA 2000, businesses require the FSA’s permission to undertake specified types of activities including carrying out contracts of insurance; managing, dealing in or advising on, investments; accepting deposits; and issuing electronic money. Detailed regulatory requirements are contained in a Handbook published by the FSA. |
| The FSA’s statutory objectives are to maintain confidence in, and to promote public understanding of, the UK financial system; to secure an appropriate degree of consumer protection; and to reduce the scope for financial crime. In achieving these, the FSA must take account of certain “principles of good regulation” which include recognising the responsibilities of regulated firms’ own management, facilitating innovation and competition and acting proportionately in imposing burdens on the industry. |
| 1.2 | Authorised firms in the Group Currently, around 30 companies in the Group, spanning a range of financial services sectors (banking, insurance and investment business), are authorised and regulated to conduct business by the FSA. |
| The FSA supervises the banking business of 12 banks in the Group, including The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, National Westminster Bank Plc, Coutts & Co, Ulster Bank Limited and Tesco Personal Finance Limited. |
| General insurance business is principally undertaken by companies in the Direct Line Group, whilst life insurance business is undertaken by Royal Scottish Assurance plc and National Westminster Life Assurance Limited (with the Group’s joint venture partner, the Aviva Group) and Direct Line Life Insurance Company Limited. Investment management business is principally undertaken by companies in the Wealth Management Division, including Adam & Co Investment Management Limited and Coutts & Co Investment Management Limited. |
| 1.3 | The FSA’s regulatory approach and supervisory standards The regulatory regime focuses on the risks to the FSA attaining its statutory objectives and uses the full range of regulatory tools (including the authorisation of firms, rule-making, supervision, investigation and enforcement) available to the FSA. It is founded on a risk based, integrated approach to regulation. |
| The FSA can request information from, and give directions to, authorised firms. It may also require authorised firms to provide independent reports prepared by professionals, relating to issues such as the accuracy of accounting records and the adequacy of internal controls. |
| The FSA can exercise indirect control over the holding companies of authorised firms via its statutory powers to object to persons who are, or who intend to become, “controllers” of these firms. |
| Given the number of authorised firms in the Group and the range and complexity of business undertaken by these firms, they have been subject to a comprehensive risk assessment by the FSA. Generally, authorised firms in the Group are subject to direct and on-going supervision by the FSA. |
| Setting
standards for firms The FSA carries out the prudential supervision and conduct of business regulation of all authorised firms (although the application of its conduct of business rules to banking business and general insurance business is limited). |
| Prudential supervision includes monitoring the adequacy of a firm’s management, its financial resources and internal systems and controls. Firms are required to submit regular returns to the FSA which provide material for supervisory assessment. Currently, different prudential requirements apply to different sectors of the financial services industry. These requirements are being reviewed by the FSA and an Integrated Prudential Sourcebook (aimed at applying a more harmonised and consistent approach to prudential regulation across the industry) is expected to be implemented in stages, from mid 2004 until the end of 2006. |
| Many of the standards relating to the capital which firms must hold to absorb losses arising from risks to its business are determined by EC legislation or are negotiated internationally. The current capital adequacy regime requires firms to maintain certain levels of capital, of certain specified types (or tiers), against particular business risks. The 1988 Basel Capital Accord is currently being reviewed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and a revised Accord is planned for implementation at the end of 2006. This will affect all “internationally active banks”. A parallel process of reviewing and revising the current EU Capital Adequacy requirements is already underway. This will affect all European banks and investment firms and is expected to be implemented at the end of 2006. In the UK, the relevant changes will be implemented via the FSA’s Integrated Prudential Sourcebook. |
| page 164 | Additional information continued |
| In its supervisory role, the FSA sets requirements relating to matters such as consolidated supervision, capital adequacy, liquidity, large exposures, and the adequacy of accounting procedures and controls. |
| Banks are required to set out their policy on “large exposures” and to inform the FSA of this. The policy must be reviewed annually and any significant departures must be discussed with the FSA. Large exposures must be monitored and controlled. |
| As regards the insurance industry, the FSA’s primary objective is to regulate and supervise the industry so that policyholders may have confidence that they have bought appropriate products, that UK insurers are able to meet their liabilities and that they treat consumers fairly. The FSA sets requirements relating to “margins of solvency” (i.e: the excess of the value of assets over the amount of liabilities). Companies carrying out insurance business are required to submit regular statistical returns covering reserves and solvency, to the FSA. |
| The FSA has decided that fundamental changes need to be made to the way in which it regulates the UK insurance industry. Certain changes have already been introduced but the FSA is considering further improvements to strengthen insurance regulation in the future. |
| Firms must also meet standards relating to their senior management arrangements and internal systems and controls and must comply with rules designed to reduce the scope for firms to be used for money laundering. During 2002, the FSA concentrated on its objective to reduce financial crime and, given the international focus, this emphasis will continue for the foreseeable future. |
| Conduct of business standards essentially govern key aspects of firms’ relationships with customers, such as the provision of clear and adequate information, managing conflicts of interest and recommending products suitable to the needs of customers. The marketing of financial products (particularly investment products) is subject to detailed requirements. |
| The FSA’s Conduct of Business Rules currently require certain regulated firms in the Group such as RBS plc and NWB Plc to determine whether to market “packaged products” (i.e. personal pensions, life assurance, collective investment schemes and investment trust savings schemes) of only one company or group, or to become an independent intermediary, providing customers with advice across a broader range of products (this is called the “polarisation regime” and was introduced as a consumer protection mechanism). A group of persons allied together for purposes of marketing packaged products is referred to as a “marketing group”. |
| Currently, Group companies are members of one of two marketing groups – The RBS Marketing Group or the NatWest and Gartmore Marketing Group. RBS plc markets the packaged products of the RBS Marketing Group through its branches and NWB Plc (and its subsidiary, Ulster Bank Limited) markets the NatWest and Gartmore Marketing Group packaged products through its branches and, under the rules, neither RBS plc nor NWB Plc (or Ulster Bank Limited) are permitted to advise on packaged products more generally. Independent advice is available to customers through the Royal Bank of Scotland Group Independent Financial Services Limited. |
| Recognising both the substantial anti-competitive effects of the polarisation regime and the fact that it generates little consumer benefits, the FSA has conducted a review and expects to introduce substantial changes in 2003/2004. |
| Focus
on customers An important element of securing an appropriate degree of consumer protection is ensuring that suitable arrangements are made for dealing with customer complaints. Firms are required to establish appropriate internal complaint handling procedures and to report complaints statistics to the FSA. Where agreement cannot be reached between the firm and the customer, the issue can be referred for independent assessment to a complaints scheme run by the Financial Ombudsman Service. |
| The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (financed by levies on regulated firms) is available to provide compensation up to certain limits if a firm collapses owing money to investors, depositors or policyholders. |
| 1.4 | Enforcement Where appropriate, the FSA may discipline and/or prosecute for breaches of the legislative or regulatory requirements. It works closely with the criminal authorities and uses both civil and criminal powers. It can withdraw a firm’s authorisation, discipline firms and individuals, prosecute for various offences and require funds to be returned to customers. |
| The FSA also has powers under certain consumer legislation to take action against regulated firms to address unfair terms in financial services consumer contracts. |
| 1.5 | Extension of the FSA’s responsibilities From October 2004, the scope of the FSA’s responsibilities will be widened to cover the regulation and supervision of mortgage lending and administration, the provision of mortgage advice and insurance mediation services (i.e. selling and administration of insurance products). The regulatory regimes for these are being devised and are to be finalised in 2003. All of these types of activities are undertaken by companies in the Group and this extension of the scope of statutory regulation will significantly impact on how the relevant businesses operate in the future. |
page 165
| 1.6 | Other relevant UK agencies and Government departments Consumer credit issues are covered by the Department of Trade and Industry (“DTI”) and the Office of Fair Trading (“OFT”) and competition issues are dealt with by the OFT. The business of granting consumer credit is heavily regulated. The DTI also has responsibility for company law matters. The consumer credit legislation and aspects of company law are currently being reviewed, both at national and at EU levels and changes are expected. |
| 2. | United States As the indirect parent of Citizens’ subsidiary banks, the company is subject to regulation under the US Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”). Under current Board policy, the company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its US bank subsidiaries. The BHCA generally prohibits the company from acquiring, directly or indirectly, the ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities in the United States unless the Board has determined, by order or regulation, that such activities are so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In addition, the BHCA requires the company to obtain the prior approval of the Board before acquiring, directly or indirectly, the ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any US bank or bank holding company. Although the US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 permits bank holding companies that have met certain eligibility criteria and elected to become ‘financial holding companies’ to engage in a significantly broader range of non-banking activities than those described above, the company has not elected to become a financial holding company. |
| The company’s US bank and non-bank subsidiaries, and the Royal Bank and NatWest’s US offices, are subject to direct supervision and regulation by various other federal and state authorities. Citizens’ bank subsidiaries are subject to regulation by state banking authorities and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Royal Bank and NatWest’s New York branches are supervised by the New York Banking Department. The company’s US securities affiliates are subject to regulation and supervision by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| Basel II A new set of capital adequacy proposals have been issued by the Bank for International Settlements which have become known as “Basel II” and are currently scheduled for implementation in the UK on 1 January 2006. These new proposals are based around three principles or “Pillars” of Minimum Capital Requirements (Pillar 1), Supervisory Review (Pillar 2) and Market Discipline (Pillar 3). The changes proposed in the new framework represent a fundamental change to the current capital adequacy regime and will have wide ranging consequences for the Group and the banking industry as a whole. |
| Description
of property and equipment At 31 December 2002, the Group operated from approximately 3,780 (2001 – 3,690; 2000 – 3,200) locations worldwide, principally in the UK. The Royal Bank and NatWest (including their subsidiaries) had 642 and 1,642 retail branches, respectively, in the UK. Citizens had 794 retail banking offices (including in-store branches) covering Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey. A substantial majority of the UK branches are owned by the Royal Bank, NatWest and their subsidiaries or are held under leases with unexpired terms of over 50 years. The Group’s principal properties include its headquarters at St Andrew Square, Edinburgh, its principal offices in London at 135 and 280 Bishopsgate and the Drummond House administration centre located at South Gyle, Edinburgh. The Group has received planning permission for the development of its headquarters at Gogarburn, Edinburgh. |
| Freehold and long leasehold properties are revalued on a rolling basis, each property being valued at least once every five years. Interim valuations outwith the five year cycle are carried out on properties where there is an indication that its value has changed significantly, given market conditions. Any increase or deficit on revaluation is reflected in the carrying value of premises at that time. Any impairment in the value of premises where there is a clear consumption of economic benefits is charged in full to the profit and loss account. Other impairments of premises are charged to the profit and loss account after eliminating any previous revaluation surplus on the premises. Any profit from the sale of revalued premises is calculated by deducting the revalued amount from the net proceeds. The revaluation of premises at 31 December 2002 resulted in a £33 million decrease in property revaluation reserves. |
| Total capital expenditure on premises, computers and other equipment for the year ended 31 December 2002 was £872 million (2001 – £515 million; 2000 – £339 million). |
| Competition
Commission The UK Government has accepted the recommendations of the Competition Commission (“CC”) in respect of its inquiry into the UK market for small business banking. |
| The CC published its report on the supply of banking services by clearing banks to small and medium sized enterprises (“SMEs”) in March 2002. The report recommended a number of pricing and behavioural remedies. The Group has implemented the pricing remedies with effect from 1 January 2003. In line with undertakings given by the Group and three other major clearing banks to the OFT, the Group’s SME customers have been offered the choice of either receiving interest on current accounts at a prescribed rate or free core money transmission services. The Group, along with seven other clearing banks, has also given undertakings to implement the behavioural remedies. These behavioural remedies include measures to achieve speedy and error free switching of accounts between banks, unbundling of services and improving market information and transparency. |
| page 166 | Additional information continued |
| Major
shareholders Details of major shareholders in the company’s ordinary and preference shares are given on page 75. |
| With the exception of Aviva plc who acquired 27.2 million ordinary shares, representing 3.04% of the ordinary share capital on 3 February 2000, and Santander Central Hispano S.A. who sold 86.7 million ordinary shares shares representing 2.9% of the ordinary share capital on 25 November 2002, there have been no significant changes in the percentage ownership of major shareholders of the company’s ordinary and preference shares during the three years ended 31 December 2002. All shareholders within a class of the company’s shares have the same voting rights. The company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or any foreign government. |
| At 26 February 2003, the directors of the company had options to purchase a total of 1,446,005 ordinary shares of the company. |
| Santander Central Hispano, S.A. has agreed to vote its holding of the company's ordinary shares in accordance with the recommendation or directions of the Board of directors of the company. |
| As at 31 December 2002, the company’s US$ denominated shares were predominantly held by shareholders registered in the US. All other shares were predominantly held by shareholders registered outside the US. |
| Related
party transactions Santander Central Hispano, S.A. In October 1988, the Group and Banco Santander entered into an agreement whereby the Group and Banco Santander and its subsidiaries agreed to co-operate in certain banking and financial services activities in Europe, including representation in each other’s bank branches to service their respective customers, offshore and investment banking, technology development, operational co-operation and the development of representation in Europe and the Far East. In April 1999, Banco Santander merged with Banco Central Hispanoamericano, another Spanish banking group and the merged entity is now called Santander Central Hispano, S.A. (“SCH”). |
| Under the terms of the alliance agreement, the Group and SCH co-operate in certain banking and financial activities in Europe. The Group holds 2.83% of SCH’s capital stock and SCH holds 5.04% of the company’s ordinary shares. |
| Transactions with directors, officers and others At 31 December 2002, the amounts outstanding in relation to transactions, arrangements and agreements entered into by authorised institutions in the Group were £36,640,014 in respect of loans to twelve persons who were directors of the company (or persons connected with them) at any time during the financial period and £35,149 to one person who was an officer of the company at any time during the financial period. |
| There were no contracts of significance to the business of the company and its subsidiaries which subsisted at 31 December 2002, or during the year then ended, in which any director of the company had a material interest. |
| Each of the transactions described above were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as for comparable transactions with persons of a similar standing or, where applicable, with other employees. The transaction did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features. |
| Material
contracts The company and its subsidiaries are party to various contracts in the ordinary course of business. For the year ended 31 December 2002, there have been no material contracts entered into outside the ordinary course of business. |
| Litigation Members of the Group are engaged in litigation in the United Kingdom and a number of overseas jurisdictions, including the United States, involving claims by and against them which arise in the ordinary course of business. The directors of the company, after reviewing the actual, threatened and known potential claims against Group undertakings and taking into account the advice of the relevant legal advisers, are satisfied that the outcome of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on the net assets of the Group. |
| Post
balance sheet events No significant changes have occurred between the date of the financial statements and the date on which this report was approved. |
page 167
| Principal offices |
| The
company 42 St Andrew Square Edinburgh EH2 2YE |
| The
Royal Bank of Scotland plc 42 St Andrew Square Edinburgh EH2 2YE 280 Bishopsgate London EC2M 4RB |
| National
Westminster Bank Plc 135 Bishopsgate London EC2M 3UR |
| Citizens Citizens Financial Group, Inc. One Citizens Plaza Providence Rhode Island 02903 USA |
| Ulster
Bank 11-16 Donegall Square East Belfast BT1 5UB George's Quay Dublin 2 |
| Direct
Line Group Direct Line House 3 Edridge Road Croydon Surrey CR9 1AG |
| Greenwich
Capital Markets, Inc. 600 Steamboat Road Greenwich Connecticut 06830 USA |
| Lombard
North Central PLC 3 Princess Way Redhill Surrey RH1 1NP |
| Coutts
Group 440 Strand London WC2R 0QS |
| The
Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited Royal Bank House 71 Bath Street St Helier Jersey Channel Islands JE4 8PJ |
| NatWest
Offshore 23/25 Broad Street St Helier Jersey Channel Islands JE4 8QG |
| The registered office of the company is 36 St Andrew Square Edinburgh EH2 2YB (telephone 0131 556 8555). |
| The principal place of business of the company is 42 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YE (telephone 0131 556 8555). |
| page 168 | Shareholder information |
| Financial calender | |||
| Annual general meeting | 28 April 2003 at 2.00 pm, | ||
| Edinburgh International Conference Centre, | |||
| The Exchange, Morrison Street, Edinburgh | |||
| Interim results | 5 August 2003 | ||
| Final results | February 2004 | ||
| Dividends | |||
| Payment dates: | |||
| * | Ordinary shares (2002 Final) | 6 June 2003 | |
| Ordinary shares (2003 Interim) | October 2003 | ||
| Cumulative preference shares | 30 May and 31 December 2003 | ||
| Non-cumulative dollar preference shares | 31 March, 30 June, 30 September and 31 December 2003 | ||
| Ex-dividend dates: | |||
| Ordinary shares (2002 Final) | 12 March 2003 | ||
| Cumulative preference shares | 7 May 2003 | ||
| Record dates: | |||
| Ordinary shares (2002 Final) | 14 March 2003 | ||
| Cumulative preference shares | 9 May 2003 | ||
| * | If the necessary approvals are obtained from shareholders at the annual general meeting on 28 April 2003, as an alternative to cash, a scrip dividend election will be offered and shareholders will receive details of this by letter after that date. |
| Shareholder
enquiries Shareholdings in the company may be checked by visiting our website (www.rbs.co.uk/shareholder). You will need the holder identifier number printed on your share certificate or tax voucher to gain access to this information. |
| Capital
gains tax For shareholders who held RBS ordinary shares at 31 March 1982, the market value of one ordinary share held was 103p. After adjusting for the 1 March 1985 rights issue, the 1 September 1989 capitalisation issue and the bonus issue of Additional Value Shares on 12 July 2000, the adjusted 31 March 1982 base value of one ordinary share held currently is 46.1p. |
| For shareholders who held NatWest ordinary shares at 31 March 1982, the market value of one ordinary share held was 85.16p for shareholders who accepted the basic terms of the RBS offer. This takes account of the August 1984 and June 1986 rights issues and the June 1989 bonus issue of NatWest ordinary shares as well as the subsequent issue of Additional Value Shares. |
| When disposing of shares, shareholders are also entitled to indexation allowance (to April 1998 only in the case of individuals and non-corporate holders), which is calculated on the 31 March 1982 value, on the cost of subsequent purchases from the date of purchase and on the subscription for rights from the date of that payment. Further adjustments must be made where a shareholder has chosen to receive shares instead of cash for dividends. Individuals and non-corporate shareholders may also be entitled to some taper relief to reduce the amount of any chargeable gain on disposal of shares. |
| The information set out above is intended as a general guide only and is based on current United Kingdom legislation and Inland Revenue practice as at this date.This information deals only with the position of individual shareholders who are resident in the United Kingdom for tax purposes, who are the beneficial owners of their shares and who hold their shares as an investment. It does not deal with the position of shareholders other than individual shareholders, shareholders who are resident outside the United Kingdom for tax purposes or certain types of shareholders, such as dealers in securities. |
page 169
| Analyses of ordinary shareholders at 31 December 2002 |
| shareholdings | millions | % of total |
||
| Individuals | 166,765 | 243.5 | 8.4 | |
| Banks and nominee companies | 23,118 | 2,392.1 | 82.5 | |
| Investment trusts | 144 | 0.7 | - | |
| Insurance companies | 388 | 35.4 | 1.2 | |
| Other companies | 3,413 | 191.2 | 6.6 | |
| Pension trusts | 68 | 26.3 | 0.9 | |
| Other corporate bodies | 74 | 11.7 | 0.4 | |
| 193,970 | 2,900.9 | 100.0 | ||
| Range of shareholdings: | ||||
| 1–1,000 | 125,430 | 45.0 | 1.6 | |
| 1,001–10,000 | 62,572 | 173.5 | 6.0 | |
| 10,001–100,000 | 4,601 | 116.9 | 4.0 | |
| 100,001–1,000,000 | 1,032 | 322.1 | 11.1 | |
| 1,000,001–10,000,000 | 287 | 833.9 | 28.7 | |
| 10,000,001 and over | 48 | 1,409.5 | 48.6 | |
| 193,970 | 2,900.9 | 100.0 | ||
| Trading
market On 22 August 1991, 26 August 1992, 13 September 1995, 16 October 1996, 26 March 1997, 12 February 1998, 8 February 1999, 30 July 1999, 30 September 1999 and 12 June 2001, the company issued the following American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), each in connection with a public offering in the United States: |
| 8,000,000
Series B (“Series B ADSs”) representing 8,000,000 non-cumulative dollar
preference shares, Series B; 16,000,000 Series C (“Series C ADSs”) representing 16,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series C; 7,000,000 Series D (“Series D ADSs”) representing 7,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series D; 8,000,000 Series E (“Series E ADSs”) representing 8,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series E; 8,000,000 Series F (“Series F ADSs”) representing 8,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series F; 10,000,000 Series G (“Series G ADSs”) representing 10,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series G; 12,000,000 Series H (“Series H ADSs”) representing 12,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series H; 12,000,000 Series I (“Series I ADSs”) representing 12,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series I; 9,000,000 Series J (“Series J ADSs”) representing 9,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series J; and 16,000,000 Series K (“Series K ADSs”) representing 16,000,000 non-cumulative dollar preference shares, Series K. |
| Each of the respective ADSs represents the right to receive one corresponding preference share, is evidenced by an American Depositary Receipt (“ADR”) and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). |
| The ADRs evidencing the ADSs above were issued pursuant to Deposit Agreements, among the company, The Bank of New York as depository, and all holders from time to time of ADRs issued thereunder. Currently, there is no non-United States trading market for any of the non-cumulative dollar preference shares. All of the non-cumulative dollar preference shares are held by the depository, as custodian, in bearer form. |
| At 31 December 2002, there were 577 registered shareholders of Series B ADSs, 1,102 registered shareholders of Series C ADSs, 294 registered shareholders of Series D ADSs, 165 registered shareholders of Series E ADSs, 170 registered shareholders of Series F ADSs, 110 registered shareholders of Series G ADSs, 100 registered shareholders of Series H ADSs, 137 registered shareholders of Series I ADSs, 74 registered shareholders of Series J ADSs and 56 registered shareholders of Series K ADSs. |
| On 29 March 1994, the company issued 8,000,000 Exchangeable Capital Securities, Series A (“X-CAPs”) in connection with a public offering in the United States. The X-CAPs are listed on the NYSE and commenced trading under the symbol ‘RBSX’ on 29 April 1994. Currently, there is no non-US market for the X-CAPs. |
| On 30 January 2003, the company redeemed the 8 million Series B and 16 million Series C, non-cumulative dollar preference shares of US$0.01 each. |
| The ADSs, the X-CAPs and the perpetual regulatory tier one securities (“PRO’s”) are listed on the NYSE. |
| page 170 | Shareholder information continued |
| The following table shows the high and low sales prices for each of the ADSs, the X-CAPs and the PROs for the periods indicated, as reported on the NYSE composite tape: |
| Figures in US$ | Series B(1) ADSs |
Series C(1) ADSs |
Series
D ADSs |
Series
E ADSs |
Series
F ADSs |
Series
G ADSs |
Series
H ADSs |
Series
I ADSs |
Series
J ADSs |
Series
K ADSs |
Series
X X-CAPs |
PROs | ||
| By month | ||||||||||||||
| January 2003 | High | 25.22 | 25.25 | 28.60 | 29.00 | 28.12 | 25.90 | 26.17 | 27.00 | 27.65 | 27.58 | 27.08 | 116.36 | |
| Low | 25.17 | 25.14 | 26.70 | 27.02 | 27.21 | 25.18 | 25.56 | 26.50 | 26.68 | 26.85 | 26.45 | 113.36 | ||
| December 2002 | High | 28.05 | 26.20 | 27.43 | 28.20 | 27.30 | 25.63 | 25.87 | 26.90 | 27.09 | 26.95 | 27.00 | 116.36 | |
| Low | 25.05 | 25.00 | 26.30 | 26.80 | 26.65 | 25.00 | 25.08 | 26.15 | 26.35 | 26.07 | 26.40 | 112.68 | ||
| November 2002 | High | 28.00 | 25.99 | 27.10 | 27.55 | 26.75 | 25.60 | 26.00 | 26.48 | 27.05 | 26.85 | 26.88 | 114.09 | |
| Low | 27.16 | 25.56 | 26.07 | 26.52 | 26.25 | 25.19 | 25.45 | 25.90 | 26.55 | 26.01 | 26.44 | 101.01 | ||
| October 2002 | High | 27.80 | 26.10 | 27.77 | 27.90 | 28.00 | 25.52 | 25.80 | 26.83 | 27.05 | 27.24 | 27.00 | 110.24 | |
| Low | 27.17 | 25.39 | 26.30 | 26.52 | 26.40 | 25.06 | 25.25 | 25.40 | 26.40 | 26.00 | 26.50 | 100.07 | ||
| September 2002 | High | 28.00 | 26.70 | 27.69 | 27.80 | 27.65 | 25.67 | 26.05 | 27.08 | 27.50 | 27.05 | 26.98 | 114.08 | |
| Low | 26.85 | 25.53 | 26.85 | 27.10 | 26.37 | 25.10 | 25.22 | 26.01 | 26.40 | 26.10 | 26.22 | 110.07 | ||
| August 2002 | High | 27.95 | 26.20 | 27.35 | 27.50 | 27.19 | 25.73 | 26.00 | 27.00 | 27.50 | 27.30 | 26.74 | 112.09 | |
| Low | 26.92 | 25.32 | 26.48 | 26.50 | 26.19 | 25.11 | 25.18 | 25.90 | 26.40 | 25.63 | 26.30 | 102.97 | ||
| By quarter | ||||||||||||||
| 2002: Fourth quarter | High | 28.05 | 26.20 | 27.77 | 28.20 | 28.00 | 25.63 | 26.00 | 26.90 | 27.09 | 27.24 | 27.00 | 116.36 | |
| Low | 25.05 | 25.00 | 26.07 | 26.52 | 26.25 | 25.00 | 25.08 | 25.40 | 26.35 | 26.00 | 26.40 | 100.07 | ||
| 2002: Third quarter | High | 28.24 | 26.70 | 27.69 | 27.80 | 27.65 | 25.73 | 26.05 | 27.08 | 27.50 | 27.30 | 26.98 | 114.08 | |
| Low | 26.75 | 25.25 | 25.90 | 26.28 | 25.50 | 24.50 | 25.00 | 24.70 | 26.25 | 24.90 | 26.05 | 101.21 | ||
| 2002: Second quarter | High | 28.50 | 25.90 | 27.60 | 27.26 | 26.55 | 25.50 | 25.48 | 26.20 | 27.29 | 26.38 | 26.90 | 106.74 | |
| Low | 26.45 | 25.09 | 25.74 | 25.90 | 25.23 | 24.46 | 24.27 | 25.03 | 25.45 | 24.79 | 25.50 | 101.70 | ||
| 2002: First quarter | High | 27.85 | 26.20 | 27.15 | 27.50 | 27.35 | 25.69 | 26.00 | 26.66 | 27.47 | 26.23 | 26.65 | 106.97 | |
| Low | 26.10 | 25.17 | 25.85 | 25.53 | 25.15 | 24.46 | 24.49 | 24.50 | 25.65 | 24.80 | 25.35 | 101.05 | ||
| 2001: Fourth quarter | High | 28.05 | 26.75 | 27.75 | 27.94 | 27.20 | 25.85 | 26.14 | 26.90 | 28.85 | 26.95 | 27.10 | 106.44 | |
| Low | 26.15 | 25.19 | 25.84 | 25.82 | 25.60 | 24.80 | 24.70 | 25.45 | 25.95 | 22.17 | 25.78 | 98.89 | ||
| 2001: Third quarter | High | 27.25 | 26.20 | 27.99 | 27.65 | 27.20 | 25.86 | 25.50 | 26.56 | 27.31 | 26.50 | 27.20 | 101.38 | |
| Low | 25.52 | 25.27 | 26.07 | 26.30 | 25.40 | 24.20 | 24.30 | 25.00 | 25.50 | 24.90 | 26.10 | 96.58 | ||
| 2001: Second quarter | High | 27.10 | 26.24 | 26.60 | 26.60 | 26.25 | 24.95 | 25.00 | 26.00 | 26.55 | 25.55 | 26.90 | - | |
| Low | 25.70 | 25.15 | 25.83 | 25.42 | 25.15 | 24.10 | 23.40 | 25.01 | 24.80 | 25.00 | 25.70 | - | ||
| 2001: First quarter | High | 26.98 | 26.05 | 26.72 | 26.13 | 26.15 | 24.82 | 24.80 | 25.70 | 26.30 | - | 26.65 | - | |
| Low | 25.44 | 25.19 | 25.38 | 25.25 | 24.31 | 22.94 | 22.75 | 24.63 | 25.00 | - | 25.50 | - | ||
| By year | ||||||||||||||
| 2002 (2) | High | 28.50 | 26.70 | 27.77 | 28.20 | 28.00 | 25.73 | 26.05 | 27.08 | 27.50 | 27.30 | 27.00 | 116.36 | |
| Low | 25.05 | 25.00 | 25.74 | 25.53 | 25.15 | 24.46 | 24.27 | 24.50 | 25.45 | 24.79 | 25.35 | 100.07 | ||
| 2001(2) | High | 28.05 | 26.75 | 27.99 | 27.94 | 27.20 | 25.86 | 27.15 | 27.00 | 28.85 | 26.95 | 27.20 | 106.44 | |
| Low | 25.44 | 25.15 | 25.38 | 25.25 | 24.31 | 22.94 | 22.75 | 24.63 | 24.80 | 22.17 | 25.50 | 96.58 | ||
| 2000 (3) | High | 26.50 | 25.75 | 25.50 | 25.31 | 24.63 | 23.00 | 22.94 | 25.00 | 25.50 | - | 26.00 | - | |
| Low | 24.94 | 21.13 | 20.63 | 19.81 | 19.13 | 18.88 | 17.63 | 19.63 | 21.13 | - | 21.56 | - | ||
| 1999 (4) | High | 26.80 | 26.70 | 28.00 | 27.90 | 27.25 | 25.75 | 25.45 | 25.20 | 25.00 | - | 28.15 | - | |
| Low | 25.65 | 24.75 | 24.80 | 24.70 | 24.15 | 21.50 | 21.30 | 23.50 | 25.00 | - | 24.45 | - | ||
| 1998 (4) | High | 27.20 | 26.95 | 27.90 | 28.05 | 27.10 | 26.00 | - | - | - | - | 27.30 | - | |
| Low | 25.80 | 25.30 | 25.45 | 25.50 | 25.00 | 23.90 | - | - | - | - | 25.75 | - | ||
(1) |
Notes: Redeemed on 30 January 2003. |
| (2) | Year ended 31 December. |
| (3) | 15 months ended 31 December. |
| (4) | Year ended 30 September. |
page 171
| Memorandum
and articles of association The following information is a summary of certain terms of the company’s Memorandum of Association (the “Memorandum”) and Articles of Association (the “Articles”) as in effect at the date of this Annual Report and certain relevant provisions of the Companies Act 1985, as amended (the “Act”) as relevant to the holders of any class of share. The following summary description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms and provisions of the Memorandum and Articles. The Memorandum and Articles are registered with the Registrar of Companies of Scotland. Holders of any class of share are encouraged to read the full Memorandum and Articles, which have been filed with the SEC. |
| Incorporation and registration The company was incorporated and registered in Scotland under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1967 as a limited company on 25 March 1968 under the name National and Commercial Banking Group Limited. On 10 March 1982, it changed its name to its present name and was reregistered under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1980 as a public company with limited liability. The company is registered under Company No. SC 45551. |
| Purpose and objects The Memorandum provides, amongst other things, that its objects are to carry on the business of banking in all or any of its aspects and to carry on the business of a holding company. The company’s objects are set out in full in clause 4 of the Memorandum. |
| Directors At each annual general meeting of the company, one third of the directors (or the number nearest to one third) subject to retirement will retire by rotation and be eligible for re-election. The directors to retire will be those who have been longest in office since their last appointment or reappointment or, in the case of those who were appointed or re-appointed on the same day, will (unless they otherwise agree) be determined by lot. Each director must retire by rotation at the third annual general meeting following the general meeting at which he was appointed or last reappointed. |
| Directors may be appointed by the company by ordinary resolution or by the Board. A director appointed by the Board holds office only until the next annual general meeting, whereupon he will be eligible for re-election, and is not taken into account in determining the directors who are to retire by rotation at that meeting. Unless and until otherwise determined by ordinary resolution, the directors (other than alternate directors) shall be not more than twenty five. There is no stipulation in the Articles regarding a minimum number of directors; under the Act, and in the absence of express provision, the minimum number is two. |
| Directors’ interests A director shall not vote at a meeting of the Board or a committee of the Board on any resolution of the Board concerning a matter in which he has an interest (otherwise than by virtue of his interest in shares, debentures or other securities of, or otherwise in or through, the company) which (together with any interest of any person connected with him) is, to his knowledge, material unless his interest arises only because the resolution relates to one or more of the following matters: |
| (i) | the giving of any security or indemnity in respect of money lent, or obligations incurred by him or any other person at the request of, or for the benefit of, the company or any of its subsidiary undertakings; |
| (ii) | the giving of any security or indemnity to a third party in respect of a debt or obligation of the company or any of its subsidiary undertakings for which he has assumed responsibility (in whole or in part) under a guarantee or indemnity or by the giving of security; |
| (iii) | a proposal concerning an offer of shares, debentures or other securities of the company, or any of its subsidiary undertakings, for subscription or purchase, in which offer he is, or may be, entitled to participate as a holder of securities or in the underwriting or sub-underwriting of which he is to participate; |
| (iv) | a contract, arrangement, transaction or proposal concerning any other body corporate in which he is interested, directly or indirectly, whether as an officer or shareholder or otherwise, provided that he is not the holder of shares representing one per cent or more of any class of the equity share capital of such body corporate; |
| (v) | any proposal concerning the adoption, modification or operation of a pension fund or retirement, death or disability benefits scheme or employees’ share scheme which relates both to directors and employees of the company or a subsidiary of the company and does not provide any privilege in respect of any director which it does not accord to the employees to which the fund or scheme relates; |
| (vi) | a contract, arrangement, transaction or proposal for the benefit of the employees of the company or any of its subsidiary undertakings which does not award him any privilege or benefit not generally accorded to the employees to whom the arrangement relates; and |
| (vii) | a contract, arrangement, transaction or proposal concerning any insurance which the company proposes to purchase and/or maintain for, or for the benefit of, any directors or for persons who include directors of the company. |
| page 172 | Shareholder information continued |
| Borrowing powers The directors may exercise all the powers of the company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and uncalled capital and to issue debentures and other securities, whether outright or as collateral security for any debt, liability or obligation of the company, or of any third party. |
| Retirement In accordance with section 293 of the Act and the Articles, no person who has attained the age of 70 may be appointed to the Board and any serving director reaching that age must vacate his office at the conclusion of the annual general meeting commencing next after he or she attains the age of 70. |
| Notwithstanding the foregoing, directors of any age may be appointed to or remain on the Board if that appointment is or was made or approved by the company in a general meeting provided that special notice containing the age of the relevant director is given. |
| Qualifying shareholding Directors are not required to hold any shares of the company by way of qualification. |
| Classes of shares The company has 4 general classes of shares, including ordinary shares, preference shares, Additional Value Shares and non-voting deferred shares to which the provisions set forth below apply. |
| Dividends General Subject to the provisions of the Act and clause 133 of the Articles, the company may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends on ordinary shares save that no dividend shall exceed the amount recommended by the Board. |
| Any dividend which has remained unclaimed for 12 years from the date when it became due for payment shall, if the Board so resolves, be forfeited and shall revert to the company. The company may cease sending dividend warrants and cheques by post or otherwise to a member if such instruments have been returned undelivered to, or left uncashed by, that member on at least two consecutive occasions, or, following one such occasion, reasonable enquiries have failed to establish any new address or account of the registered holder. The company may resume sending warrants and cheques if the holder requests such recommencement in writing. |
| Preference shares Each cumulative preference share confers the right to a fixed cumulative preferential dividend payable half-yearly. Each non-cumulative preference share confers the right to a preferential dividend (not exceeding a specified amount) payable in the currency of the relevant share. The rate of such dividend and the date of payment thereof, together with the terms and conditions of the dividend are as may be determined by the directors prior to allotment. Cumulative preference share dividends are paid in priority to any dividend on any other class of share. |
| The non-cumulative preference shares rank for dividend after the cumulative preference shares but rank pari passu with each other and any shares expressed to rank, in terms of participation in the profits of the company, in some or all respects pari passu therewith and otherwise in priority to dividends payable on the ordinary shares and any other share capital in the company. |
| Dividends will be declared and paid in full on non-cumulative preference shares if, in the opinion of the directors of the company, the company has sufficient distributable profits, after payment in full or the setting aside of a sum to provide for all dividends accrued on the cumulative preference shares, to cover such payment in full. |
| If, in the opinion of the directors, insufficient profits of the company are available to cover the payment in full of dividends after having paid any dividends payable on any of the cumulative preference shares, dividends will be declared by the directors pro rata on the non-cumulative preference shares to the extent of the available distributable profits. |
| The non-cumulative preference shares will carry no further rights to participate in the profits of the company and if, and to the extent, any dividend or part of any dividend is on any occasion not paid for the reasons described above, holders of non-cumulative preference shares will have no claim in respect of such non-payment. |
| If any dividend is not payable for the reasons described above, or if payment of any dividend would cause a breach of the UK Financial Services Authority’s capital adequacy requirements applicable to the company or its subsidiaries, the directors may pay a special dividend not exceeding US$0.01, £0.01 or €0.01 (depending on the currency of the relevant preference share) per share. |
| If the dividend payable on any series of non-cumulative preference shares on the most recent payment date is not paid in full, or if a sum is not set aside to provide for such payment in full, no dividends may be declared on any other share capital of the company other than the cumulative preference shares and no sum may be set aside for the payment of a dividend on any other share capital, unless, on the date of declaration, an amount equal to the dividend payable in respect of the then current dividend period for such series of non-cumulative preference shares is set aside for payment in full on the next dividend payment date. |
| If any dividend payable on the non-cumulative preference shares is not paid in full or if a sum is not set aside to provide for such payment in full, the company may not redeem or purchase or otherwise acquire any other share capital of the company |
page 173
| and may not set aside any sum nor establish any sinking fund for its redemption, purchase or other such acquisition, until such time as dividends have been declared and paid in full in respect of successive dividend periods together aggregating not less than twelve months. |
| Additional Value Shares (“AVS”) Each AVS will provide, subject to declaration by and at the discretion of the directors, dividends in aggregate of £1 per AVS as described in paragraph 2.1 of Schedule 4 to the Articles or conversion into ordinary shares and a resale mechanism as described in paragraph 2.7 of Schedule 4 to the Articles. |
| Notwithstanding the foregoing, no dividend will be paid on the AVSs if and to the extent that such payment would constitute an unauthorised variation or abrogation of the rights as to participation in profits attached to any preference shares in the capital of the company. |
| Distribution
of assets on liquidation General On a winding-up of the company, the liquidator may, with the authority of an extraordinary resolution and any other sanction required by the Insolvency Act 1986 and subject to the rights attaching to any class of shares after payment of all liabilities, including the payment to holders of preference shares, divide amongst the members in specie the whole or any part of the assets of the company or vest the whole or any part of the assets in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of the members and may determine the scope and terms of those trusts. No member shall be compelled to accept any assets on which there is a liability. |
| Cumulative preference shares In the event of a return of capital on a winding-up or otherwise, the holders of cumulative preference shares are entitled to receive out of the surplus assets of the company available for distribution amongst the members (i) in priority to the holders of the non-cumulative preference shares and any other shares ranking pari passu therewith, the arrears of any fixed dividends including the amount of any dividend due for a payment after the date of commencement of any winding-up or liquidation but which is payable in respect of a half-year period ending on or before such date and (ii) pari passu with the holders of the non-cumulative preference shares and any other shares ranking pari passu therewith, the amount paid up or credited as paid up on such shares together with any premium. |
| Non-cumulative preference shares Each non-cumulative preference share will confer on a winding up or liquidation (except (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue) a redemption or purchase by the company of any shares in the capital of the company), the right to receive out of surplus assets of the company available for distribution amongst the members after payment of the arrears (if any) of the cumulative dividend on the cumulative preference shares and in priority to the holders of the ordinary shares, repayment of the amount paid up or credited as paid up on the non-cumulative preference shares together with any premium paid on issue pari passu with the holders of the cumulative preference shares and together with an amount equal to accrued and unpaid dividends. |
| Additional Value Shares If the company is wound up or liquidated or there is a return of capital (other than a redemption or purchase of any shares of any class in the capital of the company), the holders of the AVS will be entitled to receive in sterling out of the surplus assets of the company available for distribution amongst the members in priority to the holders of the ordinary shares of the company but after payment of all amounts outstanding to holders of any preference share in the capital of the company or any other share ranking in priority to the AVSs, an amount of £1 less the aggregate amount of any dividends paid in respect of each AVS prior to the date of the winding up or liquidation (but for the avoidance of doubt excluding any distribution paid in the winding up or liquidation). |
| If the assets available for distribution are insufficient to pay in full the amounts payable with respect to the AVS, the holders of the AVS will share rateably in the distribution of assets (if any) in proportion to the full preferential amounts to which they are respectively entitled. |
| After payment of the full amount of the liquidation distribution to which they are entitled, the holders of the AVS will have no right or claim to any of the company’s surplus assets. |
| Voting
rights General Subject to any rights or restrictions as to voting attaching to any shares or class of shares, on a show of hands every member who is present in person at a general meeting shall have one vote and on a poll every member present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for each share held by him. No member shall be entitled to vote at a general meeting or at a separate meeting of the holders of shares in the capital of the company, either in person or by proxy, in respect of any share held by him unless all monies presently payable by him in respect of that share have been paid. |
| The quorum required for a meeting of members is not less than five members present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. If a meeting is adjourned because of the lack of a quorum, the members present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will constitute a quorum at the adjourned meeting. |
| page 174 | Shareholder information continued |
| Meetings are convened upon written notice of not less than 21 days in respect of meetings of members called for the passing of a special resolution or annual general meetings of members, and not less than 14 days in respect of most other meetings of members. |
| Cumulative preference shares At a general meeting of the company, every holder of a cumulative preference share who is present in person shall be entitled to one vote on a show of hands and, on a poll, every person who is present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for each 25 pence in nominal amount of shares held. No member shall be entitled to vote any share in person or by proxy unless all moneys owed in respect of that share have been paid. |
| Non-cumulative preference shares Holders of non-cumulative preference shares are not entitled to attend or vote at any general meeting unless the business of the meeting includes the consideration of a resolution for the winding-up of the company or any resolution directly varying or abrogating the rights attached to any such shares and then in such case only to speak to and vote upon any such resolution. |
| However, holders have the right to vote in respect of any matter when the dividend payable on their shares has not been declared in full for such number of dividend periods as the directors shall determine prior to the allotment thereof. |
| Whenever a holder is entitled to vote at a general meeting, on a show of hands every shareholder who is present in person has one vote and, on a poll, every such holder who is present in person or by proxy shall have such number of votes as may be determined by the directors prior to allotment. |
| Additional Value Shares The holders of the AVSs will not be entitled to receive notice of, attend or vote at any general meeting of shareholders except as provided by applicable law or as described in paragraph 2.5 of Schedule 4 to the Articles. |
| Redemption Unless the directors determine, prior to allotment of any particular series of preference shares, that such series shall be non-redeemable, the preference shares will be redeemable at the option of the company on any date (a “Redemption Date”) which (subject to certain exceptions described in the terms of such shares) falls no earlier than such date (if any) as may be fixed by the directors, prior to allotment of such shares. On redemption, there shall be paid on each non-cumulative preference share the aggregate of its nominal amount together with any premium paid on issue, where applicable a redemption premium and accruals of dividend. |
| Purchase General Subject to the Act, the company may, by special resolution, reduce its share capital, any capital redemption reserve and any share premium account and may also, subject to the Act, the requirements of the London Stock Exchange and the rights attached to any class of shares, purchase its own shares (including redeemable shares). |
| Non-cumulative preference shares and convertible preference shares Subject to the Act, the company may purchase any non-cumulative preference shares and convertible preference shares upon such terms as the directors shall determine provided that, where the shares being purchased are listed on the London Stock Exchange, the purchase price payable, exclusive of expenses and accrued dividends, shall not exceed (a) in the case of a purchase in the open market, or by tender, the average of the closing middle market quotations of such shares for the 10 dealing days preceding the date of the purchase or (if higher), in the case of a purchase in the open market only, the market price on the date of purchase provided that such market price is not more than 105 per cent of such average and (b) in the case of a purchase by private treaty, 120 per cent of the closing middle market quotation of such shares for the last dealing day preceding the date of purchase; but so that this proviso shall not apply to any purchase of such shares made in the ordinary course of a business of dealing in securities. Upon the purchase of any such shares, the nominal amount of such shares shall thereafter be divided into, and reclassified as, ordinary shares. |
| Conversion
rights Convertible preference shares carry the right to convert into ordinary shares if they have not been the subject of a notice of redemption from the company, on or before a specified date determined by the directors. The right to convert will be exercisable by service of a conversion notice on the company within a specified period. The company will use reasonable endeavours to arrange the sale, on behalf of convertible preference shareholders who have submitted a conversion notice, of the ordinary shares which result from such conversion and to pay to them the proceeds of such sale so that they receive net proceeds equal to the nominal value of the convertible preference shares which were the subject of the conversion notice and any premium at which such shares were issued, provided that ordinary shares will not be sold at below a benchmark price (as determined prior to the issue of the relevant convertible preference shares by the directors). |
| The Category II non-cumulative convertible sterling shares carry the right to convert into ordinary shares on three conversion dates and, if they have not been converted or redeemed prior to 31 March 2003, they will automatically convert into ordinary shares on that date. The details of the terms of the Category II non-cumulative convertible sterling preference shares are set out in Schedule 3 to the Articles. |
page 175
| Following the payment of aggregate dividends of £1 in respect of each additional value share, the additional value shares will be de-listed from the Official List and from trading on the London Stock Exchange’s market for listed securities and will convert automatically into non-voting deferred shares of £0.01 each. Non-voting deferred shares shall be utilised for the limited purpose of the conversion of additional value shares. No non-voting deferred shares are in issue at this date. A description of non-voting deferred shares is found in paragraph 2.6 of Schedule 4 to the Articles. |
| If, on 1 September 2003, aggregate dividends of £1 have not been paid in respect of each AVS, then unless the directors have resolved that a dividend be paid on or before the final dividend date of such amount that aggregate dividends paid on each AVS will be £1 and that dividend is duly paid on or before the final dividend date as described under paragraph 2.7 of Schedule 4 to the Articles, the AVS will be converted into fully paid up ordinary shares and the company will use its reasonable efforts, to the extent permitted by applicable law, to sell such ordinary shares to raise sale proceeds equivalent to an amount per AVS of £1 less the aggregate amount of any dividends paid in respect of each such AVS. The conversion into ordinary shares is subject to the conditions as described in paragraphs 2.6 and 2.7 of Schedule 4 to the Articles. |
| Changes
in share capital and variation of rights Subject to the provisions of the Act and without prejudice to any rights attached to any existing shares or class of shares, any share may be issued with such rights or restrictions as the company may by ordinary resolution determine or, subject to and in default of such determination, as the Board shall determine. Subject to the provisions of the Act, the company may issue shares which are, or at the option of the company or the holder are liable, to be redeemed. Subject to the provisions of the Act and the Articles, unissued shares are at the disposal of the Board. |
| The company may by ordinary resolution: increase its share capital; consolidate and divide all or any of its share capital into shares of larger amount than its existing shares; subject to the provisions of the Act, subdivide its shares, or any of them, into shares of smaller amount than is fixed by the Memorandum; or cancel any shares which have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person and diminish the amount of its share capital by the amount of the shares so cancelled. |
| Subject to the provisions of the Act, if at any time the capital of the company is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class of shares may (unless further conditions are provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) be varied or abrogated, whether or not the company is being wound up, either with the consent in writing of the holders of three-quarters in nominal value of the issued shares of the class or with the sanction of an extraordinary resolution passed at a separate general meeting of holders of the shares of the class (but not otherwise). |
| To any such separate general meeting the provision of the Articles relating to general meetings will apply, save that: |
| (i) | if at any adjourned meeting of such holders a quorum as defined above is not present, two people who hold shares of the class, or their proxies, are a quorum; and |
| (ii) | any such holder present in person or by proxy may demand a poll. |
| The rights attaching to any class of shares having preferential rights are not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue thereof, deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking, as regards participation in the profits or assets of the company, pari passu therewith, but in no respect in priority thereto. |
| Disclosure of interests in shares The Act gives the company the power to require persons who it believes to be, or have been within the previous three years, interested in its shares, to disclose prescribed particulars of those interests. Failure to supply the information or supplying a statement which is materially false may lead to the Board imposing restrictions upon the relevant shares. The restrictions available are the suspension of voting or other rights conferred by membership in relation to meetings of the company in respect of the relevant shares and, additionally, in the case of a shareholding representing at least 0.25 per cent of the class of shares concerned, the withholding of payment of dividends on, and the restriction of transfers of, the relevant shares. |
| Limitations on rights to own shares There are no limitations imposed by UK law or the Memorandum and Articles on the right of non-residents or foreign persons to hold or vote the company’s shares other than the limitations that would generally apply to all of the company’s shareholders. |
| Members resident abroad Members with registered addresses outside the United Kingdom are not entitled to receive notices from the company unless they have given the company an address within the United Kingdom at which such notices may be served. |
| page 176 | Shareholder information continued |
| Certain
other UK law provisions Pre-emptive rights As the company is a public company incorporated in Scotland, in general, holders of ordinary shares have automatic pre-emptive rights pursuant to section 89 of the Act. |
| Lien and forfeiture The company will have a first and paramount lien (enforceable by sale) on every partly paid share (including dividends payable on such a share) for all moneys payable to the company in respect of that share. The Board may call any moneys unpaid on shares and may forfeit shares on which calls payable are not duly paid. The forfeiture shall include all dividends payable in respect of the forfeited shares which have not been paid before the forfeiture. |
| Untraced shareholders The company shall be entitled to sell, at the best price reasonably obtainable, the shares of a member or the shares to which a person is entitled by transmission if: |
| (i) | during a period of 12 years prior to the date of advertising its intention to sell such shares at least three cash dividends in respect of such shares have become payable but all dividends or other moneys payable remain unclaimed; |
| (ii) | as soon as practicable after the expiry of the period referred to in sub-paragraph (i) above, the company inserts advertisements in one daily newspaper with a national circulation in the United Kingdom, one Scottish daily newspaper and one newspaper circulating in the area of the last known address of the member or other person giving notice of its intention to sell the shares; |
| (iii) | during the period referred to in sub-paragraph (i) above and the period of three months following the publication of the advertisements referred to in sub-paragraph (ii) above, the company receives no indication of the whereabouts or existence of the member or other person; and |
| (iv) | if the shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange, the company gives notice to the London Stock Exchange of its intention to sell the shares prior to publication of the advertisements. |
| The net proceeds of such sale shall belong to the company, which shall be obliged to account to the former member or other person previously entitled to the shares for an amount equal to the proceeds as a creditor of the company. |
| Taxation
for US Holders The following discussion summarises certain US federal and UK tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of non-cumulative dollar preference shares, ADSs, X-CAPs or PROs by a beneficial owner that is a citizen or resident of the United States or that otherwise will be subject to US federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of the non-cumulative dollar preference shares, X-CAPs, ADSs or PROs (a “US Holder”). This summary assumes that a US Holder is holding non-cumulative dollar preference shares, ADSs evidenced by ADRs, X-CAPs or PROs, as applicable, as capital assets. This summary does not address the tax consequences to a US Holder (i) that is resident (or, in the case of an individual, ordinarily resident) in the UK for UK tax purposes or, generally, (ii) that is a corporation which alone or together with one or more associated companies, controls, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting stock of the company. |
| The statements regarding US and UK tax laws (including the US/UK double taxation convention relating to income and capital gains) (the “Treaty”) and the US/UK double taxation convention relating to estate and gift taxes (the “Estate Tax Treaty”) and practices set forth below are based (i) on those laws and practices as in force and as applied in practice on the date of this Report (save that, where relevant, reference is also made to the new double taxation convention relating to income and capital gains signed by the US and signed and ratified by the UK (the “New Treaty”), which must also be ratified by the US Senate before its provisions enter into force, although no assurance can be provided as to when the New Treaty will enter into force), and (ii) in part, on representations of the depository, and assume that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. The US Treasury has expressed concerns that parties to whom ADRs are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming, by US Holders of ADRs, of foreign tax credits for US federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of UK taxes described below could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the US Treasury. As described above, the terms of the New Treaty are currently awaiting ratification by the US government; the final provisions of this treaty might alter the rules described in this discussion. This summary is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations and holders are advised to satisfy themselves as to the overall tax consequences, including specifically the consequences under US federal, state, local and other laws, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of non-cumulative dollar preference shares, ADSs evidenced by ADRs, X-CAPs or PROs by consulting their own tax advisers. |
| For the purposes of the New Treaty and the Estate Tax Treaty and for purposes of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), US Holders of ADSs will be treated as owners of the non-cumulative dollar preference shares underlying such ADSs. |
page 177
| Preference
shares or ADSs evidenced by ADRs Taxation of dividends The company is not required to withhold tax at source from dividend payments it makes or from any amount (including any amounts in respect of accrued dividends) distributed by the company. |
| When the company pays a dividend, an amount equal to 10/90ths of the amount of the cash dividend is generally allowed as a credit (the “Tax Credit”) against the UK tax liability of individuals who receive (or who are treated as receiving) the dividend and who are resident in the UK for UK tax purposes. |
| Under the Treaty, an Eligible US Holder (as defined below) is entitled to a payment from the United Kingdom of the Tax Credit to which an individual resident in the UK for UK tax purposes would have been entitled (the “Tax Credit Amount”). Such payment will be subject to a deduction withheld of an amount not exceeding 15% of the sum of the cash dividend and the Tax Credit Amount (the “UK Withholding Tax”), but not in excess of the Tax Credit Amount. |
| Accordingly, Eligible US Holders will not receive any actual payment since the UK Withholding Tax will cancel out the Tax Credit Amount. In addition, Eligible US Holders will have no further UK tax liability in respect of the dividend. |
| For the purposes of this Report, the term ‘Eligible US Holder’ means a US Holder of a non-cumulative dollar preference share or an ADS evidenced by an ADR that is a beneficial owner of the cash dividend paid thereon, and that satisfies the following conditions: (i) the US Holder is an individual or a corporation resident in the United States for purposes of the Treaty (and, in the case of a corporation, is not also resident in the UK for UK tax purposes); (ii) the US Holder is not a corporation which, alone or together with one or more associated corporations, controls, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting stock of the company; (iii) the US Holder whose holding of the non-cumulative dollar preference shares or ADSs is not effectively connected with a permanent establishment in the UK through which such US Holder carries on business or with a fixed base in the UK from which such US Holder performs independent personal services; (iv) the US Holder under certain circumstances, is not an investment or holding company, 25% or more of the capital of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by persons that are not individuals resident in, and are not nationals of, the United States; (v) the US Holder under certain circumstances, is not exempt from federal income tax on dividend income in the United States; and (vi) the US Holder under certain circumstances, does not own 10% or more of the series of non-cumulative dollar preference shares in respect of which the dividend is paid. |
| A US Holder that is a trust or estate may be entitled to the benefit of the Treaty in respect of a cash dividend paid by the company but only to the extent that dividend income derived by such US Holder is taxable in the United States as the income of a US resident in the hands of such US Holder or of its beneficiaries, as the case may be. |
| Cash distributions, including any UK tax withheld therefrom, made with respect to the non-cumulative dollar preference shares or ADSs representing preference shares will constitute dividends for US federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits of the company, as determined for US federal income tax purposes. |
| A US Holder will realise dividend income for US federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the sum of any cash dividend paid by the company and, if such Holder is an Eligible US Holder that elects under the Treaty to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to the UK Withholding Tax, the Tax Credit Amount associated with such cash dividend. Dividends paid by the company will not be eligible for the ‘dividends received deduction’ generally allowed to corporations under the Code. |
| Subject to certain limitations and restrictions, the UK Withholding Tax withheld in accordance with the Treaty will be treated for US tax purposes as a UK withholding tax that may be claimed as a credit against the US federal income tax liability of the Eligible US Holder who complies with applicable filing requirements and so elects under the Treaty. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends paid by the company with respect to the non-cumulative dollar preference shares will generally constitute ‘passive income’ or, in the case of certain US Holders, ‘financial services income’. |
| If the New Treaty enters into force, US Holders will no longer be able to claim the Tax Credit Amount in respect of any dividends paid by the company, as the New Treaty does not provide for that entitlement. As a result, no UK Withholding Tax will be deducted in respect of which US Holders would be able to claim a credit against their federal income tax liability. Therefore, the election described in the preceding paragraph will not be available once the New Treaty comes into force. |
| For this purpose, the New Treaty will generally be effective for amounts credited on or after the first day of the second month next following the date on which instruments of ratification are exchanged by the United Kingdom and the United States, except that US Holders may continue to apply the existing treaty for a 12 month period from such date if they make an appropriate election. |
| page 178 | Shareholder information continued |
| Taxation of capital gains A US Holder that is not resident (or, in the case of an individual, ordinarily resident) in the UK will not normally be liable for UK tax on capital gains realised on the disposition of such holder’s non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS unless at the time of the disposal such US Holder carries on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a branch or agency and such non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS is or has been used, held or acquired for the purposes of such trade (or profession or vocation), branch or agency. Special rules apply to individuals who are temporarily not resident or ordinarily resident in the UK. |
| A US Holder will, upon the sale, exchange or redemption of a non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS representing preference shares, generally recognise capital gains or losses for US federal income tax purposes (assuming in the case of a redemption, that such US Holder does not own, and is not deemed to own, any ordinary shares of the company) in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realised (excluding in the case of a redemption any amount treated as a dividend for US federal income tax purposes) and the US Holder’s tax basis in the non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS. |
| A US Holder who is liable for both UK and US tax on a gain recognised on the disposal of the non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS will generally be entitled, subject to certain limitations, to credit the UK tax against its US federal income tax liability in respect of such gain. |
| Estate and gift tax A non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS held by an individual, whose domicile is determined to be the United States for purposes of the Estate Tax Treaty and who is not a national of the UK, will not be subject to UK inheritance tax on the individual’s death or on a lifetime transfer of the non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS, except in certain cases where the non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS (i) is comprised in a settlement (unless, at the time of the settlement, the settlor was domiciled in the United States and was not a national of the UK); (ii) is part of the business property of a UK permanent establishment of an enterprise; or (iii) pertains to a UK fixed base of an individual used for the performance of independent personal services. The Estate Tax Treaty generally provides a credit against US federal tax liability for the amount of any tax paid in the UK in a case where the non-cumulative dollar preference share or ADS is subject both to UK inheritance tax and to US federal estate or gift tax. |
| UK stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax (“SDRT”) The following is a summary of the UK stamp duty and SDRT consequences of transferring an ADS in registered form (otherwise than to the custodian on cancellation of the ADS) or of transferring a non-cumulative dollar preference share. |
| A transfer of a registered ADS executed and retained in the US will not give rise to stamp duty and an agreement to transfer a registered ADS will not give rise to SDRT. |
| Stamp duty or SDRT will normally be payable on or in respect of transfers of non-cumulative dollar preference shares and accordingly any holder who acquires or intends to acquire non-cumulative dollar preference shares is advised to consult his own tax advisers in relation to stamp duty and SDRT. |
| X-CAPs United States Because the X-CAPs have no stated maturity, can be exchanged for preference shares or ADSs at the option of the company and would be treated as if they were preference shares in a winding-up of the company, and because the company may elect not to make payments on the X-CAPs, the X-CAPs will be treated as equity for US federal income tax purposes. |
| Payments (including any UK tax withheld therefrom) will constitute foreign source dividend income for US federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the company, as determined for US federal income tax purposes. Payments will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations. For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, payments will generally constitute ‘passive income’, or in the case of certain US Holders, ‘financial services income’. |
| A US Holder will, upon the sale, exchange or redemption of X-CAPs, generally recognise a capital gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realised and the US Holder’s tax basis in the X-CAPs (assuming, in the case of a redemption, that such US Holder does not own, and is not deemed to own, any ordinary shares of the company). A US Holder who is liable for both UK and US tax on a gain recognised on the disposal of the X-CAPs will generally be entitled, subject to certain limitations, to credit the UK tax against its US federal income tax liability in respect of such gain. |
| Gain or loss will not be recognised by a US Holder upon the exchange of X-CAPs for preference shares or ADSs pursuant to the company’s exercise of its exchange right. A US Holder’s basis in the preference shares or ADSs received in exchange for its X-CAPs will be the same as the US Holder’s basis in the X-CAPs at the time of the exchange and the US Holder’s holding period for the preference shares or ADSs received in the exchange will include the holding period of the X-CAPs exchanged. |
page 179
| United
Kingdom Taxation of payments of interest Payments of interest will not be subject to withholding or deduction for or on account of UK taxation as long as X-CAPs are and remain at all times listed on the New York Stock Exchange or some other ‘recognised stock exchange’ within the meaning of section 841 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. So long as the X-CAPs are so listed, withholding will not be required whether the X-CAPs are in bearer or registered form. In all other cases an amount must be withheld on account of UK income tax at the lower rate (currently 20%) subject to any direction to the contrary by the Inland Revenue under the Treaty and except that the withholding obligation is disapplied in respect of payments to persons who the Issuer reasonably believes are within the charge to corporation tax or fall within various categories enjoying a special tax status (including charities and pension funds), or are partnerships consisting of such persons (unless the Inland Revenue directs otherwise). |
| Any paying agent or other person through whom interest is paid to, or by whom interest is received on behalf of, an individual, may be required to provide information in relation to the payment and the individual concerned to the UK Inland Revenue. The Inland Revenue may communicate this information to the tax authorities of other jurisdictions. |
| The UK Inland Revenue has confirmed that interest payments should not be treated as distributions for UK tax purposes (i) by reason of the fact that interest may be deferred under the terms of issue or (ii) by reason of the undated nature of the X-CAPs, provided that at the time an interest payment is made, the X-CAPs are not held by a company which is ‘associated’ with the company or by a ‘funded company’. A company will be associated with the company if, broadly speaking, it is in the same group as the company. A company will be a ‘funded company’ for these purposes if there are arrangements involving that company being put in funds (directly or indirectly) by the company, or an entity associated with the company. In this respect, the Inland Revenue has confirmed that a company holding an interest in X-CAPs which incidentally has banking facilities with any company associated with the company will not be a ‘funded company’ by virtue of such facilities. |
| Interest on the X-CAPs constitutes UK source income for tax purposes and, as such, may be subject to income tax by direct assessment even where paid without withholding. However, interest with a UK source received without deduction or withholding on account of UK tax will not be chargeable to UK tax in the hands of a US Holder unless that US Holder carries on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a UK branch or agency in connection with which the interest is received or to which the X-CAPs are attributable. There are exemptions for interest received by certain categories of agent (such as some brokers and investment managers). |
| Proposed EU Directive on taxation of savings income The European Union is currently considering proposals for a new directive regarding the taxation of savings income. Subject to a number of important conditions being met, it is proposed that Member States of the European Union will be required to provide to the tax authorities of another Member State details of payments of interest or other similar income paid by a person within its jurisdiction to or for the benefit of an individual resident in that other Member State, subject to the right of certain Member States to opt instead for a withholding system for a transitional period in relation to such payments. |
| Disposal (including redemption) A disposal (including redemption) of X-CAPs by a US Holder, who is an individual or other non corporation tax payer, will not give rise to any liability to UK taxation on capital gains unless the US Holder carries on a trade (which for this purpose includes a profession or vocation) in the UK through a branch or agency and the X-CAPs are, or have been, held or acquired for the purposes of that trade or branch or agency. However, the exchange by such a US Holder of X-CAPs for ADSs pursuant to the company’s exercise of its exchange right will not give rise to a charge to UK tax on capital gains. |
| A transfer of X-CAPs by a US Holder will not give rise to a charge to UK tax on accrued but unpaid interest payments, unless the US Holder is an individual or other non corporation tax payer and at any time in the relevant year of assessment or accounting period carries on a trade in the UK through a branch or agency to which the X-CAPs are attributable. |
| Annual tax charges Corporate holders of X-CAPs may be subject to annual UK tax charges (or relief) by reference to fluctuations in exchange rates and in respect of profits, gains and losses arising from the X-CAPs, in place of the tax treatment referred to in the two preceding paragraphs. These rules will not, however, apply to corporate US Holders who do not carry on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a branch or agency in the UK to which the X-CAPs are attributable. |
| Inheritance tax X-CAPs in bearer form physically held outside the UK should not be subject to UK inheritance tax in respect of a lifetime transfer by, or the death of, a US Holder who is not domiciled in the UK for inheritance tax purposes. However, in relation to X-CAPs held through DTC (or any other clearing system), the position is not free from doubt and the Inland Revenue are known to consider that the situs of securities held in this manner is not necessarily determined by the place in which the securities are physically held. If X-CAPs in bearer form are or become situated in the UK, or if X-CAPs are held in registered form, there may be a charge to UK inheritance tax as a result of a lifetime transfer at less than fair market value by, or on the death of, such a US Holder. However, exemption from, or a reduction of, any such UK tax liability may be available under the Estate Tax Treaty in the same manner as for non-cumulative dollar preference shares. |
| page 180 | Shareholder information continued |
| Stamp duty and SDRT No UK stamp duty is payable on the transfer by delivery or redemption of bearer X-CAPs, whether in definitive form or in the form of one or more global X-CAPs. No SDRT is payable on any agreement to transfer bearer X-CAPs provided that the agreement is not made in contemplation of, or as part of an arrangement for, a takeover of the company. |
| No UK stamp duty will be payable in respect of any instrument of transfer of depositary interests representing X-CAPs, provided that any instrument relating to such a transfer is not executed in the UK, and remains at all times outside the UK. Depositary interests representing X-CAPs will not be “chargeable securities” for SDRT purposes and consequently a transfer of such depositary interests will not be subject to SDRT. The transfer on the sale of X-CAPs in registered form will attract ad valorem UK stamp duty or (if an unconditional agreement to transfer X-CAPs is not completed by a duly stamped transfer) UK SDRT, generally, at the rate of 0.5% of the consideration paid, which, in the case of stamp duty, will be rounded up to £5 or multiples thereof. The transfer of X-CAPs in registered form (i) to, or to a nominee, or agent for, a person whose business is or includes issuing depositary receipts or (ii) to, or to a nominee for, a person whose business is or includes the provision of clearance services, will give rise to a liability to UK stamp duty or (to the extent that UK stamp duty is not paid on an instrument of transfer) UK SDRT, generally, at the rate of 1.5% of the price of the X-CAPs transferred, which, in the case of stamp duty, will be rounded up to £5 or multiples thereof. Such a transfer of X-CAPs in bearer form will give rise to a charge to UK SDRT, generally, at the rate of 1.5% of the price of the X-CAPs transferred. A charge to UK SDRT will also arise on the issue of X-CAPs whether in registered or bearer form (i) to, or to a nominee or agent for, a person whose business is or includes issuing depositary receipts or (ii) to, or to a nominee for, a person whose business is or includes the provision of clearance services, generally at the rate of 1.5% of the price of the X-CAPs issued. |
| PROs United States Payments of interest on a PRO (including any UK tax withheld therefrom) will constitute foreign source dividend income for US federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the company, as determined for US federal income tax purposes. Payments will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations. For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, payments will generally constitute ‘passive income’, or in the case of certain US Holders, ‘financial services income’. A US Holder who is entitled under the Treaty to a refund of UK tax, if any, withheld on a payment will not be entitled to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to such tax. See ‘United Kingdom – Taxation of Payments of Interest’ below for a discussion of circumstances in which UK withholding may apply. |
| A US Holder will, upon the sale, exchange or redemption of a PRO, generally recognise a capital gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realised (excluding any amount in respect of mandatory interest and any Missed Payments which are to be satisfied on a Missed Payment Satisfaction Date, which would be treated as ordinary income) and the US Holder’s tax basis in the PRO (assuming, in the case of a redemption, that such US Holder does not own, and is not deemed to own, any ordinary shares of the company). A US Holder who is liable for both UK and US tax on a gain recognised on the disposal of PROs will generally be entitled, subject to certain limitations, to credit the UK tax against its US federal income tax liability in respect of such gain. |
| United
Kingdom Taxation of payments of interest Payments of interest will not be subject to withholding or deduction for or on account of UK taxation as long as the PROs are and remain at all times listed on a ‘recognised stock exchange’ within the meaning of section 841 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. So long as the PROs are so listed, withholding will not be required. In all other cases an amount must be withheld on account of UK income tax at the lower rate (currently 20%) subject to any direction to the contrary by the Inland Revenue under the Treaty and except that the withholding obligation is disapplied in respect of payments to persons who the Issuer reasonably believes are within the charge to corporation tax or fall within various categories enjoying a special tax status (including charities and pension funds), or are partnerships consisting of such persons (unless the Inland Revenue directs otherwise). Where interest has been paid under deduction of UK withholding tax, US Holders may be able to recover the tax deducted under the Treaty. |
| Any paying agent or other person by or through whom interest is paid to, or by whom interest is received on behalf of, an individual, may be required to provide information in relation to the payment and the individual concerned to the UK Inland Revenue. The Inland Revenue may communicate this information to the tax authorities of other jurisdictions. |
| The UK Inland Revenue confirmed at around the time of the issue of the PROs that interest payments would not be treated as distributions for UK tax purposes (i) by reason of the fact that interest may be deferred under the terms of issue or (ii) by reason of the undated nature of the PROs, provided that at the time an interest payment is made, the PROs are not held by a company which is ‘associated’ with the company or by a ‘funded company’. A company will be associated with the company if, broadly speaking, it is part of the same group as the company. A company will be a ‘funded company’ for these purposes if there are arrangements involving that company being put in funds (directly or indirectly) by the company, or an |
page 181
| entity associated with the company. In this respect, the Inland Revenue has confirmed that a company holding an interest in the PROs which incidentally has banking facilities with any company associated with the company will not be a ‘funded company’ by virtue of such facilities. |
| Interest on the PROs constitutes UK source income for tax purposes and, as such, may be subject to income tax by direct assessment even where paid without withholding. However, interest with a UK source received without deduction or withholding on account of UK tax will not be chargeable to UK tax in the hands of a US Holder unless that US Holder carries on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a UK branch or agency in connection with which the interest is received or to which the PROs are attributable. There are exemptions for interest received by certain categories of agent (such as some brokers and investment managers). |
| Proposed EU Directive on taxation of savings income The European Union is currently considering proposals for a new directive regarding the taxation of savings income. Subject to a number of important conditions being met, it is proposed that Member States of the European Union will be required to provide to the tax authorities of another Member State details of payments of interest or other similar income paid by a person within its jurisdiction to or for the benefit of an individual resident in that other Member State, subject to the right of certain Member States to opt instead for a withholding system for a transitional period in relation to such payments. |
| Disposal (including redemption) A disposal (including redemption) of PROs by a US Holder, who is an individual or other non corporation tax payer, will not give rise to any liability to UK taxation on capital gains unless the US Holder carries on a trade (which for this purpose includes a profession or a vocation) in the UK through a branch or agency and the PROs are, or have been, held or acquired for the purposes of that trade or branch or agency. |
| A transfer of PROs by a US Holder will not give rise to a charge to UK tax on accrued but unpaid interest payments, unless the US Holder is an individual or other non corporation tax payer and at any time in the relevant year of assessment or accounting period carries on a trade in the UK through a branch or agency to which the PROs are attributable. |
| Annual tax charges Corporate holders of PROs may be subject to annual UK tax charges (or relief) by reference to fluctuations in exchange rates and in respect of profits, gains and losses arising from the PROs, in place of the tax treatment referred to in the two preceding paragraphs. These rules will, however, only apply to corporate US Holders who carry on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a branch or agency in the UK to which the PROs are attributable. |
| Inheritance tax In relation to PROs held through DTC (or any other clearing system), the position on the UK inheritance tax is not free from doubt in respect of a lifetime transfer, or death of, a US Holder who is not domiciled in the UK for inheritance tax purposes; the UK Inland Revenue are known to consider that the situs of securities held in this manner is not necessarily determined by the place where the securities are registered. In appropriate circumstances, there may be a charge to UK inheritance tax as a result of a lifetime transfer at less than fair market value by, or on the death of, such a US Holder. However, exemption from, or a reduction of, any such UK tax liability may be available under the Estate Tax Treaty. |
| Stamp duty and SDRT No stamp duty, SDRT or similar tax is imposed in the UK on the issue, transfer or redemption of the PROs. |
| Exchange
controls The company has been advised that there are currently no UK laws, decrees or regulations which would prevent the remittance of dividends or other payments to non-UK resident holders of the company’s non-cumulative dollar preference shares. |
| There are no restrictions under the articles of association of the company or under UK law, as currently in effect, which limit the right of non-UK resident owners to hold or, when entitled to vote, freely to vote the company’s non-cumulative dollar preference shares. |
| Documents
on display Documents concerning the company may be inspected at 42 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 2YE (telephone 0131 556 8555). |
| In addition, we file reports and other information with the SEC. You can read and copy these reports and other information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room or at the offices of The New York Stock Exchange, on which certain of our securities are listed, at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov which contains in electronic form each of the reports and other information that we have filed electronically with the SEC. |
| page 182 | SEC Form 20-F cross reference guide |
| Item | Item Caption | Pages | |
| PART I | |||
| 1 | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers | Not applicable1 | |
| 2 | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | Not applicable | |
| 3 | Key Information | ||
| Selected financial data | 155 - 159, 185 | ||
| Capitalisation and indebtedness | Not applicable | ||
| Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds | Not applicable | ||
| Risk factors | 9 | ||
| 4 | Information on the Company | ||
| History and development of the Company | 6 - 8, 74, 167, 171 | ||
| Business overview | 6 - 8, 162 - 165 | ||
| Organisational structure | 6, 167 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 117, 165 | ||
| 5 | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | ||
| Operating
results |
1 - 5, 10 - 49, 52 - 59, 64 - 66 | ||
| Liquidity and capital resources | 48 - 49, 60 - 62, 65 | ||
| Research and development, patents, licences etc | Not applicable | ||
| Trend information | 3, 5, 185 | ||
| 6 | Directors, Senior Management and Employees | ||
| Directors and senior management | 72 - 73 | ||
| Compensation | 80 - 89 | ||
| Board practices | 78 - 79, 83 - 85 | ||
| Employees | 43, 76 - 77 | ||
| Share ownership | 76, 87, 90 | ||
| 7 | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | ||
| Major shareholders | 75, 166 | ||
| Related party transactions | 166 | ||
| Interests of experts and counsel | Not applicable | ||
| 8 | Financial Information | ||
| Consolidated statements and other financial information | 92 - 154, 166 | ||
| Significant changes | 166 | ||
1 “Not applicable” in this cross-reference guide means an item is not required because this Form 20-F is filed as an Annual Report, not applicable to the Group or otherwise not included herein.
page 183
| Item | Item Caption | Pages | |
| 9 | The Offer and Listing | ||
| Offer and listing details | 169 - 170, 185 | ||
| Plan of distribution | Not applicable | ||
| Markets | 169 - 170, 185 | ||
| Selling shareholders | Not applicable | ||
| Dilution | Not applicable | ||
| Expenses of the issue | Not applicable | ||
| 10 | Additional Information | ||
| Share capital | Not applicable | ||
| Memorandum and articles of association | 171 - 176 | ||
| Material contracts | 166 | ||
| Exchange controls | 181 | ||
| Taxation | 176 - 181 | ||
| Dividends and paying agents | Not applicable | ||
| Statement of experts | Not applicable | ||
| Documents on display | 181 | ||
| Subsidiary information | Not applicable | ||
| 11 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk | 50 - 71, 130 - 136 | |
| 12 | Description of Securities other than Equity Securities | Not applicable | |
| PART II | |||
| 13 | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | Not applicable | |
| 14 | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | Not applicable | |
| 15 | Controls and Procedures | 78 - 79 | |
| 16 | [Reserved] | ||
| PART III | |||
| 17 | Financial Statements | Not applicable | |
| 18 | Financial Statements | 92 - 154 | |
| 19 | Exhibits | 186 | |
| Signature | 187 | ||
| Certifications | 188 - 189 | ||
| page 184 | Glossary |
| Term used | US equivalent or brief description | |
| Accounts | Financial statements | |
| Allotted | Issued | |
| Articles of association | Bylaws | |
| Attributable profit | Net income | |
| Balance sheet | Statement of financial position | |
| Bills | Notes | |
| Called-up share capital | Ordinary shares, issued and fully paid | |
| Capital allowances | Tax depreciation allowances | |
| Creditors | Payables | |
| Dealing | Trading | |
| Debtors | Receivables | |
| Deferred tax | Deferred income tax | |
| Depreciation | Amortisation | |
| Fees and commissions payable | Fee and commission expense | |
| Fees and commissions receivable | Fee and commission income | |
| Finance lease | Capital lease | |
| Freehold | Ownership with absolute rights in perpetuity | |
| Interest payable | Interest expense | |
| Interest receivable | Interest income | |
| Interests in associated undertakings | Long-term equity investments accounted for by the equity method | |
| Loan capital | Long-term debt | |
| Loans and advances | Loan and lease receivables | |
| Memorandum items | Commitments and contingencies | |
| Nominal value | Par value | |
| Ordinary shares | Common stock | |
| Overdraft | A
line of credit, contractually repayable on demand unless a fixed-term has
been agreed, established through a customer’s current account |
|
| Preference shares | Preferred stock | |
| Property | Real estate | |
| Profit and loss account | Income statement | |
| Profit and loss account reserve | Retained earnings | |
| Provisions | Allowances | |
| Revaluation reserve | Increase
or temporary decrease in the valuation of certain assets as compared with historical cost |
|
| Share capital | Ordinary shares or common stock issued and fully paid | |
| Shareholders’ funds | Shareholders’ equity | |
| Shares in issue | Shares outstanding | |
| Share premium account | Additional paid-in capital | |
| Tangible fixed assets | Property, plant and equipment | |
| Write-offs | Charge-offs | |
| Published
by The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc. Printed by Pillans & Waddies, Edinburgh. |
page 185
Supplementary Form 20-F information
Trend information
In line with undertakings given by the Group and three other major clearing banks to the Office of Fair Trading (“OFT”), the Group’s SME customers have been offered, with effect from 1 January 2003, the choice of either receiving interest on current accounts at a prescribed rate or free core money transmission services. This, together with competitive pressures and the low interest rate environment, is likely to adversely affect the Group’s net interest margin.
The Group, along with seven other clearing banks, has also given undertakings to the OFT to implement behavioural remedies, including measures to achieve speedy and error free switching of accounts between banks, unbundling of services and improving market information and transparency.
Despite international uncertainty casting a shadow over the key economies in which it operates, the Group considers that its strength, diversity and flexibility present many options for future growth not only in the UK, but also in the US and in Continental Europe.
Exchange rates
| US dollars per £1 | February 2003 |
| Noon Buying Rate | |
| High | 1.6480 |
| Low | 1.5727 |
On 18 March 2003, the Noon Buying Rate was £1.00 = $1.5624.
Trading market
| Series D | Series E | Series F | Series G | Series H | Series I | Series J | Series K | Series X | |||
| Figures in US$ | ADSs | ADSs | ADSs | ADSs | ADSs | ADSs | ADSs | ADSs | X-CAPs | PROs | |
| February 2003 | High | 28.65 | 28.85 | 28.00 | 25.85 | 26.35 | 27.30 | 28.00 | 27.65 | 27.15 | 118.65 |
| Low | 26.77 | 27.85 | 27.40 | 27.65 | 26.02 | 26.88 | 27.30 | 27.24 | 26.82 | 115.59 | |
Note
Series B and Series C were redeemed on 30 January 2003.
page 186
Exhibits
| Exhibit Number | Description | |
| 1.1* | Memorandum and Articles of Association of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc | |
| 4.1* | Service contract for Fred Goodwin | |
| 4.2* | Service contract for Iain Robertson | |
| 4.2.1 | Variation agreement to service contract for Iain Robertson | |
| 4.3* | Service contract for Norman McLuskie | |
| 4.4* | Service contract for Fred Watt | |
| 4.5* | Service contract for Gordon Pell | |
| 4.5.1 | Variation agreement to service contract for Gordon Pell | |
| 4.6* | Service contract for Larry Fish | |
| 7.1 | Explanation of ratio calculations | |
| 8.1 | Principal subsidiaries of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc | |
| 10.1 | Independent auditors’ consent | |
*Previously filed.
page 187
Signature
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
The
Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc
Registrant
/s/
Fred Watt
Fred Watt
Group Finance Director
19 March 2003
I, Frederick Anderson Goodwin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”) and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: 19 March 2003
/s/ Fred Goodwin
Group Chief Executive
I, Frederick Inglis Watt, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: 19 March 2003
/s/ Fred Watt
Group Finance Director
Exhibit Index
| Exhibit Number | Description | |
| 1.1* | Memorandum and Articles of Association of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc | |
| 4.1* | Service contract for Fred Goodwin | |
| 4.2* | Service contract for Iain Robertson | |
| 4.2.1 | Variation agreement to service contract for Iain Robertson | |
| 4.3* | Service contract for Norman McLuskie | |
| 4.4* | Service contract for Fred Watt | |
| 4.5* | Service contract for Gordon Pell | |
| 4.5.1 | Variation agreement to service contract for Gordon Pell | |
| 4.6* | Service contract for Larry Fish | |
| 7.1 | Explanation of ratio calculations | |
| 8.1 | Principal subsidiaries of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc | |
| 10.1 | Independent auditors’ consent | |
*Previously filed.