Form 10-K
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

 

Commission File Number   Exact name of registrants as specified in their charters  

I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number

001-08489   DOMINION RESOURCES, INC.   54-1229715
001-02255   VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY   54-0418825
 

VIRGINIA

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 
 

120 TREDEGAR STREET

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

23219

(Zip Code)

 

(804) 819-2000

(Registrants’ telephone number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange

on Which Registered

DOMINION RESOURCES, INC.  
Common Stock, no par value   New York Stock Exchange

2009 Series A 8.375%

Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes

  New York Stock Exchange
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY  

Preferred Stock (cumulative),

$100 par value, $5.00 dividend

  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  x    No  ¨             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  ¨    No  x             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  x    No  ¨             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  x    No  ¨             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    x            Virginia Electric and Power Company    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Dominion Resources, Inc.

 

Large accelerated filer  x   Accelerated filer  ¨   Non-accelerated filer  ¨       Smaller reporting company  ¨

Virginia Electric and Power Company

 

Large accelerated filer  ¨   Accelerated filer  ¨   Non-accelerated filer  x   Smaller reporting company  ¨
   

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  ¨    No  x             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of Dominion Resources, Inc. common stock held by non-affiliates of Dominion was approximately $30.0 billion based on the closing price of Dominion’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of the last day of Dominion’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Dominion is the sole holder of Virginia Electric and Power Company common stock. As of January 31, 2013, Dominion had 576,309,631 shares of common stock outstanding and Virginia Power had 274,723 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

Portions of Dominion’s 2013 Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference in Part III.

This combined Form 10-K represents separate filings by Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company. Information contained herein relating to an individual registrant is filed by that registrant on its own behalf. Virginia Power makes no representations as to the information relating to Dominion’s other operations.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

Dominion Resources, Inc. and

Virginia Electric and Power Company

 

Item

Number

         

 

Page

Number

  

  

  

Glossary of Terms

     1   

Part I

  

1.

  

Business

     5   

1A.

  

Risk Factors

     20   

1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

     24   

2.

  

Properties

     24   

3.

  

Legal Proceedings

     27   

4.

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

     27   
  

Executive Officers of Dominion

     28   

Part II

  

5.

  

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     29   

6.

  

Selected Financial Data

     30   

7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     31   

7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     50   

8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     52   

9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     124   

9A.

  

Controls and Procedures (Dominion)

     124   

9B.

  

Other Information

     127   

Part III

  

10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

     127   

11.

  

Executive Compensation

     128   

12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     151   

13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     151   

14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     152   

Part IV

  

15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

     153   


Table of Contents

Glossary of Terms

 

The following abbreviations or acronyms used in this Form 10-K are defined below:

 

Abbreviation or Acronym    Definition

2009 Base Rate Review

  

Order entered by the Virginia Commission in January 2009, pursuant to the Regulation Act, initiating reviews of the base rates and terms and conditions of all investor-owned utilities in Virginia

2013 Proxy Statement

  

Dominion 2013 Proxy Statement, File No. 001-08489

ABO

  

Accumulated benefit obligation

AES

  

Alternative Energy Solutions

AFUDC

  

Allowance for funds used during construction

AIP

  

Annual Incentive Plan

AMI

  

Advanced Metering Infrastructure

AMR

  

Automated meter reading program deployed by East Ohio

AOCI

  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

AROs

  

Asset retirement obligations

ARP

  

Acid Rain Program, a market-based initiative for emissions allowance trading, established pursuant to Title IV of the CAA

ASA

  

Average Speed of Answer, a primary metric used to measure customer service

ASLB

  

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

ATEX line

  

Appalachia to Texas Express ethane line

bcf

  

Billion cubic feet

Bear Garden

  

A 590 MW combined cycle, natural gas-fired power station in Buckingham County, Virginia

Biennial Review Order

  

Order issued by the Virginia Commission in November 2011 concluding the 2009 - 2010 biennial review of Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions

Blue Racer

  

Blue Racer Midstream, LLC

BOEM

  

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

BP

  

BP Wind Energy North America Inc.

Brayton Point

  

Brayton Point power station

BREDL

  

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League

Bremo

  

Bremo power station

BRP

  

Dominion Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

Brunswick County

  

A proposed 1,358 MW combined cycle, natural gas-fired power station in Brunswick County, Virginia

CAA

  

Clean Air Act

Caiman

  

Caiman Energy II, LLC

CAIR

  

Clean Air Interstate Rule

CAO

  

Chief Accounting Officer

Carson-to-Suffolk line

  

Virginia Power 60-mile 500 kV transmission line in southeastern Virginia

CD&A

  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

CDO

  

Collateralized debt obligation

CEO

  

Chief Executive Officer

CERCLA

  

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980

CFO

  

Chief Financial Officer

CFTC

  

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

CGN Committee

  

Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committee of Dominion’s Board of Directors

Chesapeake

  

Chesapeake power station

CNG

  

Consolidated Natural Gas Company

CNO

  

Chief Nuclear Officer

CO2

  

Carbon dioxide

COL

  

Combined Construction Permit and Operating License

Companies

  

Dominion and Virginia Power, collectively

CONSOL

  

CONSOL Energy, Inc.

COO

  

Chief Operating Officer

Cooling degree days

  

Units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is greater than 65 degrees Fahrenheit, calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day

Cove Point

  

Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP

CSAPR

  

Cross State Air Pollution Rule

CWA

  

Clean Water Act

DCI

  

Dominion Capital, Inc.

DEI

  

Dominion Energy, Inc.

Dodd-Frank Act

  

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010

DOE

  

Department of Energy

Dominion

  

The legal entity, Dominion Resources, Inc., one or more of Dominion Resources, Inc.’s consolidated subsidiaries (other than Virginia Power) or operating segments or the entirety of Dominion Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries

 

        1

 


Table of Contents

Glossary of Terms, continued

 

 

Abbreviation or Acronym    Definition

Dominion Direct®

  

A dividend reinvestment and open enrollment direct stock purchase plan

Dooms-to-Bremo line

  

Virginia Power project to rebuild approximately 43 miles of existing 115 kV to 230 kV lines, between the Dooms and Bremo substations

Dooms-to-Lexington line

  

Virginia Power project to rebuild approximately 39 miles of an existing 500 kV line, between the Dooms and Lexington substations

DPP

  

Dominion’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan

DRS

  

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

DSM

  

Demand-side management

DTI

  

Dominion Transmission, Inc.

DVP

  

Dominion Virginia Power operating segment

E&P

  

Exploration & production

East Ohio

  

The East Ohio Gas Company, doing business as Dominion East Ohio

EGWP

  

Employer Group Waiver Plan

Elwood

  

Elwood power station

Enterprise

  

Enterprise Product Partners, L.P.

EPA

  

Environmental Protection Agency

EPACT

  

Energy Policy Act of 2005

EPS

  

Earnings per share

ERISA

  

The Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ERM

  

Enterprise Risk Management

ERO

  

Electric Reliability Organization

ESRP

  

Dominion Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan

Excess Tax Benefits

  

Benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock-based compensation

Fairless

  

Fairless power station

FASB

  

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FCM

  

Futures Commission Merchant

FERC

  

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Fitch

  

Fitch Ratings Ltd.

Fowler Ridge

  

A wind-turbine facility joint venture with BP in Benton County, Indiana

Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan

  

Dominion Resources, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan

Frozen DSOP

  

Dominion Resources, Inc. Security Option Plan

FTRs

  

Financial transmission rights

GAAP

  

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

GHG

  

Greenhouse gas

GWSA

  

Global Warming Solutions Act

Harrisonburg-to-Endless Caverns line

  

Virginia Power project to construct a 20-mile 230 kV line from the Harrisonburg substation to the Endless Caverns substation

Hayes-to-Yorktown line

  

Virginia Power project to construct an approximately eight-mile 230 kV transmission line in southeastern Virginia

Heating degree days

  

Units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is less than 65 degrees Fahrenheit, calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day

Hope

  

Hope Gas, Inc., doing business as Dominion Hope

INPO

  

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations

IRC

  

Internal Revenue Code

IRS

  

Internal Revenue Service

ISO

  

Independent system operator

ISO-NE

  

ISO New England

Joint Committee

  

U.S. Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation

June 2006 hybrids

  

2006 Series A Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes due 2066

June 2009 hybrids

  

2009 Series A Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes due 2064, subject to extensions no later than 2079

Juniper

  

Juniper Capital L.P.

Kewaunee

  

Kewaunee nuclear power station

Kincaid

  

Kincaid power station

kV

  

Kilovolt

kWh

  

Kilowatt-hour

LIBOR

  

London Interbank Offered Rate

LIFO

  

Last-in-first-out inventory method

LNG

  

Liquefied natural gas

LTIP

  

Long-term incentive program

MATS

  

Utility Mercury and Air Toxics Standard Rule

Manchester Street

  

Manchester Street power station

 

2        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Abbreviation or Acronym    Definition

mcf

  

million cubic feet

MD&A

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun line

  

Virginia Power 65-mile 500 kV transmission line that begins in Warren County, Virginia and terminates in Loudoun County, Virginia

Medicare Act

  

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003

Medicare Part D

  

Prescription drug benefit introduced in the Medicare Act

MF Global

  

MF Global Inc.

MGD

  

Million gallons a day

Millstone

  

Millstone nuclear power station

MISO

  

Midwest Independent Transmission System Operators, Inc.

Moody’s

  

Moody’s Investors Service

Mt. Storm-to-Doubs line

  

Virginia Power project to rebuild approximately 96 miles of an existing 500 kV transmission line in Virginia and West Virginia

MW

  

Megawatt

MWh

  

Megawatt hour

NAAQS

  

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NAV

  

Net asset value

NCEMC

  

North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation

NedPower

  

A wind-turbine facility joint venture with Shell in Grant County, West Virginia

NEIL

  

Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited

NEOs

  

Named executive officers

NERC

  

North American Electric Reliability Corporation

NGLs

  

Natural gas liquids

NO2

  

Nitrogen dioxide

Non-Employee Directors Plan

  

Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan

North Anna

  

North Anna nuclear power station

North Branch

  

North Branch power station

North Carolina Commission

  

North Carolina Utilities Commission

North Carolina Settlement Approval Order

  

Order issued by the North Carolina Commission in December 2010 approving the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement filed by Virginia Power in connection with the ending of its North Carolina base rate moratorium

NOX

  

Nitrogen oxide

NPDES

  

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

NRC

  

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

NSPS

  

New Source Performance Standards

NYMEX

  

New York Mercantile Exchange

NYSE

  

New York Stock Exchange

ODEC

  

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative

Ohio Commission

  

Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

OSHA

  

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PBGC

  

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

Peoples

  

The Peoples Natural Gas Company

Pipeline Safety Act

  

The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011

PIPP

  

Percentage of Income Payment Plan

PIR

  

Pipeline Infrastructure Replacement program deployed by East Ohio

PJM

  

PJM Interconnection, LLC

PM&P

  

Pearl Meyer & Partners

PNG Companies LLC

  

An indirect subsidiary of Steel River Infrastructure Fund North America

ppb

  

Parts-per-billion

Radnor Heights Project

  

Virginia Power project to construct three new 230 kV underground transmission lines totaling approximately 6 miles and the associated Radnor Heights substation in Arlington County, Virginia

RCCs

  

Replacement Capital Covenants

RCRA

  

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

Regulation Act

  

Legislation effective July 1, 2007, that amended the Virginia Electric Utility Restructuring Act and fuel factor statute, which legislation is also known as the Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act

REIT

  

Real estate investment trust

RGGI

  

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

Rider A1

  

A rate adjustment clause to reduce anticipated over-collected fuel expense for the second half of 2012, effective November 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012

Rider B

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to the conversion of three of Virginia Power’s coal-fired power stations to biomass

 

        3

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Abbreviation or Acronym    Definition

Rider BW

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to Brunswick County

Rider R

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to Bear Garden

Rider S

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center

Rider T

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of certain electric transmission-related expenditures

Rider T1

  

A rate adjustment clause to recover the difference between revenues produced from current Rider T rates included in base rates, and the new revenue requirement developed for the rate year beginning September 1, 2012

Rider W

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to Warren County

Riders C1 and C2

  

Rate adjustment clauses associated with the recovery of costs related to certain DSM programs

Riders C1A and C2A

  

Rate adjustment clauses associated with the recovery of costs related to certain DSM programs approved in the 2011 DSM case

ROE

  

Return on equity

ROIC

  

Return on invested capital

RPS

  

Renewable Portfolio Standard

RTEP

  

Regional transmission expansion plan

RTO

  

Regional transmission organization

SAFSTOR

  

A method of nuclear decommissioning, as defined by the NRC, in which a nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit release for unrestricted use

SAIDI

  

System Average Interruption Duration Index, metric used to measure electric service reliability

Salem Harbor

  

Salem Harbor power station

SEC

  

Securities and Exchange Commission

September 2006 hybrids

  

2006 Series B Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes due 2066

Shell

  

Shell WindEnergy, Inc.

SO2

  

Sulfur dioxide

Standard & Poor’s

  

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

State Line

  

State Line power station

Surry

  

Surry nuclear power station

Surry-to-Skiffes Creek-to-Whealton lines

  

Virginia Power project to construct a 7-mile 500 kV line from Surry to the proposed Skiffes Creek Switching Station and a 20-mile 230 kV line from the proposed Skiffes Creek Switching Station to the Whealton substation

TGP

  

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

TSR

  

Total shareholder return

U.S.

  

United States of America

U.S. DOT

  

United States Department of Transportation

UAO

  

Unilateral Administrative Order

UEX Rider

  

Uncollectible Expense Rider

VEBA

  

Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association

VIE

  

Variable interest entity

Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center

  

A 600 MW baseload carbon-capture compatible, clean coal powered electric generation facility in Wise County, Virginia

Virginia Commission

  

Virginia State Corporation Commission

Virginia Power

  

The legal entity, Virginia Electric and Power Company, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries or operating segments or the entirety of Virginia Power and its consolidated subsidiaries

Virginia Settlement Approval Order

  

Order issued by the Virginia Commission in March 2010 concluding Virginia Power’s 2009 Base Rate Review

Warren County

  

A 1,329 MW combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power station under construction in Warren County, Virginia

Waxpool-Brambleton-BECO line

  

Virginia Power project to construct an approximately 1.5-mile double circuit 230 kV line to a new Waxpool substation, and a new 230 kV line between the Brambleton and BECO substations

West Virginia Commission

  

Public Service Commission of West Virginia

Yorktown

  

Yorktown power station

 

4        

 


Table of Contents

Part I

 

 

 

Item 1. Business

GENERAL

Dominion, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia and incorporated in Virginia in 1983, is one of the nation’s largest producers and transporters of energy. Dominion’s strategy is to be a leading provider of electricity, natural gas and related services to customers primarily in the eastern region of the U.S. Dominion’s portfolio of assets includes approximately 27,500 MW of generating capacity, 6,300 miles of electric transmission lines, 56,900 miles of electric distribution lines, 11,000 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage pipeline and 21,800 miles of gas distribution pipeline, exclusive of service lines of two inches in diameter or less. Dominion also operates one of the nation’s largest underground natural gas storage systems, with approximately 947 bcf of storage capacity, and serves nearly 6 million utility and retail energy customers in 15 states.

Dominion is focused on expanding its investment in regulated electric generation, transmission and distribution and regulated natural gas transmission and distribution infrastructure within and around its existing footprint. Dominion expects this will continue to increase its earnings contribution from regulated operations, while reducing the sensitivity of its earnings to commodity prices.

Dominion continues to expand and improve its regulated electric and natural gas businesses, in accordance with its five-year capital investment program. A major impetus for this program is to meet the anticipated increase in electricity demand in its electric utility service territory. Other drivers for the capital investment program include the construction of infrastructure to handle the increase in natural gas production from the Marcellus and Utica Shale formations; and to upgrade Dominion’s gas distribution and electric transmission and distribution networks. Planned investments to gather and process natural gas production from the Utica Shale formation, in eastern Ohio and western Pennsylvania, are expected to be made by the newly-formed Blue Racer joint venture.

Dominion’s nonregulated operations include merchant generation, energy marketing and price risk management activities and retail energy marketing operations. Dominion is in the process of transitioning to a more regulated earnings mix as evidenced by its capital investments in regulated infrastructure, as well as dispositions of certain merchant generation facilities during 2012 and its announcement that other merchant generation facilities are expected to be sold or decommissioned in 2013. Dominion’s operations are conducted through various subsidiaries, including Virginia Power.

Virginia Power, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia and incorporated in Virginia in 1909 as a Virginia public service corporation, is a regulated public utility that generates, transmits and distributes electricity for sale in Virginia and North Carolina. In Virginia, Virginia Power conducts business under the name “Dominion Virginia Power” and primarily serves retail customers. In North Carolina, it conducts business under the name “Dominion North Carolina Power” and serves retail customers located in the northeastern region of the state, excluding certain municipalities. In addition, Virginia Power sells electricity at wholesale prices to rural electric cooperatives, municipalities and into wholesale electricity markets. All of Virginia Power’s common stock is owned by Dominion.

Amounts disclosed for Dominion are inclusive of Virginia Power, where applicable.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2012, Dominion had approximately 15,500 full-time employees, of which approximately 5,800 employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. As of December 31, 2012, Virginia Power had approximately 6,800 full-time employees, of which approximately 3,100 employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements.

 

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Dominion and Virginia Power’s principal executive offices are located at 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 and their telephone number is (804) 819-2000.

 

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT DOMINION AND VIRGINIA POWER

Dominion and Virginia Power file their annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Their SEC filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document they file at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.

Dominion and Virginia Power make their SEC filings available, free of charge, including the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, through Dominion’s internet website, www.dom.com, as soon as practicable after filing or furnishing the material to the SEC. You may also request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing or telephoning Dominion at: Corporate Secretary, Dominion, 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219, Telephone (804) 819-2000. Information contained on Dominion’s website is not incorporated by reference in this report.

 

 

ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Following are significant divestitures by Dominion and Virginia Power during the last five years. There were no significant acquisitions by either registrant during this period.

SALE OF E&P PROPERTIES

In 2010, Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations, including its rights to associated Marcellus acreage, to a subsidiary of CONSOL for approximately $3.5 billion. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The historical results of the Appalachian E&P operations are included in the Dominion Energy segment.

SALE OF PEOPLES

In February 2010, Dominion completed the sale of Peoples to PNG Companies LLC and netted after-tax proceeds of approximately $542 million. The historical results of these operations are included in the Corporate and Other segment and presented in discontinued operations. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

 

 

        5

 


Table of Contents

 

 

ASSIGNMENT OF MARCELLUS ACREAGE

In 2008, Dominion completed a transaction with Antero Resources to assign drilling rights to approximately 117,000 acres in the Marcellus Shale formation located in West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Dominion received proceeds of approximately $347 million. Under the agreement, Dominion received a 7.5% overriding royalty interest on future natural gas production from the assigned acreage. The overriding royalty interest was transferred to CONSOL as part of the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations in 2010.

SALE OF CERTAIN DCI OPERATIONS

In March 2008, Dominion reached an agreement to sell its remaining interest in the subordinated notes of a third-party CDO entity held as an investment by DCI and in April 2008 received proceeds of $54 million, including accrued interest. Dominion deconsolidated the CDO entity as of March 31, 2008.

 

 

OPERATING SEGMENTS

Dominion manages its daily operations through three primary operating segments: DVP, Dominion Generation and Dominion Energy. Dominion also reports a Corporate and Other segment, which includes its corporate, service company and other functions (including unallocated debt) and the net impact of operations that are expected to be or are currently discontinued, which is discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

Virginia Power manages its daily operations through two primary operating segments: DVP and Dominion Generation. It also reports a Corporate and Other segment that primarily includes specific items attributable to its operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

While daily operations are managed through the operating segments previously discussed, assets remain wholly-owned by Dominion and Virginia Power and their respective legal subsidiaries.

A description of the operations included in the Companies’ primary operating segments is as follows:

 

Primary Operating

Segment

  Description of Operations   Dominion     Virginia
Power
 

DVP

  Regulated electric distribution     X        X   
  Regulated electric transmission     X        X   
   

Nonregulated retail energy marketing (electric and gas)

    X           

Dominion Generation

  Regulated electric fleet     X        X   
    Merchant electric fleet     X           

Dominion Energy

  Gas transmission and storage     X     
  Gas distribution and storage     X     
  LNG import and storage     X     
    Producer services     X           

For additional financial information on operating segments, including revenues from external customers, see Note 25 to the

Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information on operating revenue related to Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s principal products and services, see Notes 2 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

DVP

The DVP Operating Segment of Virginia Power includes Virginia Power’s regulated electric transmission and distribution (including customer service) operations, which serve approximately 2.5 million residential, commercial, industrial and governmental customers in Virginia and North Carolina.

DVP has announced its five-year investment plan, which includes spending approximately $4.5 billion from 2013 through 2017 to upgrade or add new transmission and distribution lines, substations and other facilities to meet growing electricity demand within its service territory and maintain reliability. The proposed electric delivery infrastructure projects are intended to address both continued customer growth and increases in electricity consumption by the typical consumer. In addition, data centers continue to contribute to anticipated demand growth, with an expected load of approximately 715 MW by the end of 2013.

Revenue provided by electric distribution operations is based primarily on rates established by state regulatory authorities and state law. Variability in earnings is driven primarily by changes in rates, weather, customer growth and other factors impacting consumption such as the economy and energy conservation, in addition to operating and maintenance expenditures. Operationally, electric distribution continues to focus on improving service levels while striving to reduce costs and link investments to operational results. As a result, electric service reliability and customer service have improved. The three-year average SAIDI has improved from 125 minutes at the end of 2007 to 105 minutes at the end of 2012. Likewise, ASA has also shown significant improvement. The three-year average ASA has improved from 57 seconds at the end of 2007 to 38 seconds at the end of 2012. Customer service options continue to be enhanced and expanded through the use of technology. Customers now have the ability to use the Internet for routine billing and payment transactions, connecting and disconnecting service, reporting outages and obtaining outage updates. Additionally, customers can follow progress of electric service restoration efforts following major outages by accessing Facebook or Twitter. In the future, safety, electric service reliability and customer service will remain key focal areas for electric distribution.

Revenue provided by Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations is based primarily on rates approved by FERC. The profitability of this business is dependent on its ability, through the rates it is permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on its capital investments. Variability in earnings primarily results from changes in rates and the timing of property additions, retirements and depreciation.

Virginia Power is a member of PJM, an RTO, and its electric transmission facilities are integrated into PJM wholesale electricity markets. Consistent with the increased authority given to NERC by EPACT, Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations are committed to meeting NERC standards, modernizing its infrastructure and maintaining superior system reliability. Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations will continue to focus on

 

 

6        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

safety, operational performance, NERC compliance and execution of PJM’s RTEP.

The DVP Operating Segment of Dominion includes all of Virginia Power’s regulated electric transmission and distribution operations as discussed above, as well as Dominion’s nonregulated retail energy marketing operations.

Dominion’s retail energy marketing operations compete in nonregulated energy markets. The retail business requires limited capital investment and currently employs approximately 190 people. The retail customer base includes 2.1 million customer accounts and is diversified across three product lines-natural gas, electricity and energy-related products and services. Dominion has a heavy concentration of natural gas customers in markets where utilities have a long-standing commitment to customer choice. Dominion pursues customers in electricity markets where utilities have divested of generation assets and where customers are permitted and have opted to purchase from the market. Major growth drivers are net customer additions, new market penetration, product development and expanded sales channels and supply optimization.

COMPETITION

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Within Virginia Power’s service territory in Virginia and North Carolina, there is no competition for electric distribution service. Additionally, since its electric transmission facilities are integrated into PJM, electric transmission services are administered by PJM and are not subject to competition in relation to transmission service provided to customers within the PJM region. Virginia Power is seeing continued growth in new customers in its transmission and distribution operations. In its Order 1000 compliance filing, PJM has proposed tariff changes that, if approved by FERC, could allow certain transmission facilities to be constructed in Virginia Power’s service territory by entities other than Virginia Power beginning in 2013.

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion

Dominion’s retail energy marketing operations compete against incumbent utilities and other energy marketers in nonregulated energy markets for natural gas and electricity. Customers in these markets have the right to select a retail marketer and typically do so based upon price savings or price stability; however, incumbent utilities have the advantage of long-standing relationships with their customers and greater name recognition in their markets.

REGULATION

Virginia Power’s electric retail service, including the rates it may charge to jurisdictional customers, is subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission. Virginia Power’s wholesale electric transmission rates, tariffs and terms of service are subject to regulation by FERC. Electric transmission siting authority remains the jurisdiction of the Virginia and North Carolina Commissions. However, EPACT provides FERC with certain backstop authority for transmission siting. See State Regulations and Federal Regulations in Regulation and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information, including a discussion of the 2011 Biennial Review Order.

PROPERTIES

Virginia Power has approximately 6,300 miles of electric transmission lines of 69 kV or more located in the states of North Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. Portions of Virginia Power’s electric transmission lines cross national parks and forests under permits entitling the federal government to use, at specified charges, any surplus capacity that may exist in these lines. While Virginia Power owns and maintains its electric transmission facilities, they are a part of PJM, which coordinates the planning, operation, emergency assistance and exchange of capacity and energy for such facilities.

Each year, as part of PJM’s RTEP process, reliability projects are authorized. In December 2012, Virginia Power completed construction of the Hayes-to-Yorktown line at a total project cost of $79 million. This previously authorized PJM project was designed to improve the reliability of service to customers and the region. Previously approved PJM-authorized reliability projects such as the Waxpool-Brambleton-BECO line ($49 million), the Harrisonburg-to-Endless Caverns line ($66 million) the Radnor Heights Project ($81 million), and the Dooms-to-Bremo line ($65 million) continue to progress and are expected to be completed on time.

As part of subsequent annual PJM RTEP processes, PJM authorized additional electric transmission upgrade projects including the Mt. Storm-to-Doubs line ($350 million) in December 2010 and the Surry-to-Skiffes Creek-to-Whealton lines ($155 million) in 2012. Also approved as a reliability project in 2012 was the Dooms-to-Lexington line ($112 million). See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding electric transmission projects.

In addition, Virginia Power’s electric distribution network includes approximately 56,900 miles of distribution lines, exclusive of service level lines, in Virginia and North Carolina. The grants for most of its electric lines contain rights-of-way that have been obtained from the apparent owners of real estate, but underlying titles have not been examined. Where rights-of-way have not been obtained, they could be acquired from private owners by condemnation, if necessary. Many electric lines are on publicly-owned property, where permission to operate can be revoked.

SOURCES OF ENERGY SUPPLY

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

DVP’s supply of electricity to serve Virginia Power customers is produced or procured by Dominion Generation. See Dominion Generation for additional information.

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion

The supply of electricity to serve Dominion’s retail energy marketing customers is procured through market wholesalers and RTO or ISO transactions. The supply of gas to serve Dominion’s retail energy marketing customers is procured through market wholesalers or by Dominion Energy. See Dominion Energy for additional information.

SEASONALITY

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

DVP’s earnings vary seasonally as a result of the impact of changes in temperature, the impact of storms and other cata-

 

 

7

 


Table of Contents

 

 

strophic weather events, and the availability of alternative sources for heating on demand by residential and commercial customers.

Generally, the demand for electricity peaks during the summer and winter months to meet cooling and heating needs. An increase in heating degree days for DVP’s electric-utility related operations does not produce the same increase in revenue as an increase in cooling degree days, due to seasonal pricing differentials and because alternative heating sources are more readily available.

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion

The earnings of Dominion’s retail energy marketing operations also vary seasonally. Generally, the demand for electricity peaks during the summer and winter months to meet cooling and heating needs, while the demand for gas peaks during the winter months to meet heating needs.

Dominion Generation

The Dominion Generation Operating Segment of Virginia Power includes the generation operations of the Virginia Power regulated electric utility and its related energy supply operations. Virginia Power’s utility generation operations primarily serve the supply requirements for the DVP segment’s utility customers.

Earnings for the Generation operating segment of Virginia Power primarily result from the sale of electricity generated by its utility fleet. Revenue is based primarily on rates established by state regulatory authorities and state law. Approximately 80% of revenue comes from serving Virginia jurisdictional customers. Rates for the Virginia jurisdiction are set using a modified cost-of-service rate model. The cost of fuel and purchased power is generally collected through fuel cost-recovery mechanisms established by regulators and does not materially impact net income. Variability in earnings for Virginia Power’s generation operations results from changes in rates, the demand for services, which is primarily weather dependent, and labor and benefit costs, as well as the timing, duration and costs of scheduled and unscheduled outages. See Electric Regulation in Virginia under Regulation and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The Dominion Generation Operating Segment of Dominion includes Virginia Power’s generation facilities and its related energy supply operations described above as well as the generation operations of Dominion’s merchant fleet and energy marketing and price risk management activities for these assets. The Generation operating segment of Dominion derives its earnings primarily from the sale of electricity generated by Virginia Power’s utility and Dominion’s merchant generation assets, as well as from associated capacity and ancillary services.

Variability in earnings provided by Dominion’s merchant fleet relates to changes in market-based prices received for electricity and capacity. Market-based prices for electricity are largely dependent on commodity prices, primarily natural gas, and the demand for electricity, which is primarily dependent upon weather. Capacity prices are dependent upon resource requirements in relation to the supply available (both existing and new) in the forward capacity auctions, which are held approximately three years in advance of the associated delivery year. Dominion manages electric and capacity price volatility of its merchant fleet by hedging a substantial portion of its expected near-term sales with

derivative instruments and also entering into long-term power sales agreements. However, earnings have been adversely impacted due to a sustained decline in commodity prices. This sustained decline in power prices in conjunction with Dominion’s regular strategic review of its portfolio of assets has led to its decision to pursue the sale or retirement of certain merchant generation assets, which is discussed in more detail below. Variability also results from changes in the cost of fuel consumed, labor and benefits and the timing, duration and costs of scheduled and unscheduled outages.

COMPETITION

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Virginia Power’s generation operations are not subject to significant competition as only a limited number of its Virginia jurisdictional electric utility customers have retail choice. See Regulation-State Regulations-Electric for more information. Currently, North Carolina does not offer retail choice to electric customers.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion

Unlike Dominion Generation’s regulated generation fleet, its merchant generation fleet is dependent on its ability to operate in a competitive environment and does not have a predetermined rate structure that allows for a rate of return on its capital investments. Competition for the merchant fleet is impacted by electricity and fuel prices, new market entrants, construction by others of generating assets and transmission capacity, technological advances in power generation, the actions of environmental and other regulatory authorities and other factors. These competitive factors may negatively impact the merchant fleet’s ability to profit from the sale of electricity and related products and services.

Dominion Generation’s merchant generation fleet owns and operates several facilities in the Midwest that operate within functioning RTOs. A significant portion of the output from these facilities is sold under long-term contracts, the majority of which expire between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, and is therefore largely unaffected by price competition during the terms of these contracts. It was announced during the third quarter of 2012 that Dominion would pursue the sale of these Midwest assets, excluding its wind facilities. In the fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced that Kewaunee is expected to be decommissioned beginning in 2013.

Dominion Generation’s other merchant assets also operate within functioning RTOs and primarily compete on the basis of price. Competitors include other generating assets bidding to operate within the RTOs. These RTOs have clearly identified market rules that ensure the competitive wholesale market is functioning properly. Dominion Generation’s merchant units compete in the spot market with other generators to sell a variety of products including energy, capacity and ancillary services. It is difficult to compare various types of generation given the wide range of fuels, fuel procurement strategies, efficiencies and operating characteristics of the fleet within any given RTO. However, Dominion applies its expertise in operations, dispatch and risk management to maximize the degree to which its merchant fleet is competitive compared to similar assets within the region.

 

 

8        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

REGULATION

Virginia Power’s utility generation fleet and Dominion’s merchant generation fleet are subject to regulation by FERC, the NRC, the EPA, the DOE, the Army Corps of Engineers and other federal, state and local authorities. Virginia Power’s utility generation fleet is also subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission. See State Regulations and Federal Regulations in Regulation for more information.

PROPERTIES

For a listing of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s existing generation facilities, see Item 2. Properties.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

The generation capacity of Virginia Power’s electric utility fleet totals 17,708 MW. The generation mix is diversified and includes coal, nuclear, gas, oil, hydro and renewables. Virginia Power’s generation facilities are located in Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina and serve load in Virginia and northeastern North Carolina.

Based on available generation capacity and current estimates of growth in customer demand in its utility service area, Virginia Power will need additional generation capacity over the next decade. Virginia Power has announced a comprehensive generation growth program, referred to as Powering Virginia, which involves the development, financing, construction and operation of new multi-fuel, multi-technology generation capacity to meet the anticipated growing demand in its core market in Virginia. Significant projects under construction or development are set forth below:

Ÿ  

In February 2012, the Virginia Commission authorized the construction of Warren County which is estimated to cost approximately $1.1 billion, excluding financing costs. It is expected to generate approximately 1,329 MW of electricity when operational. Commercial operations are scheduled to commence by late 2014. In connection with the air permit process for Warren County, Virginia Power reached an agreement to permanently retire North Branch, a 74 MW coal-fired plant located in West Virginia, once Warren County begins commercial operations. During the fourth quarter of 2012, Virginia Power sold North Branch to a salvage company that plans to demolish the station and resell the land.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power is converting three coal-fired Virginia generating stations to biomass, a renewable energy source. The conversions of the power stations in Altavista, Hopewell and Southampton County will increase Dominion’s renewable generation by more than 150 MW and are expected to cost approximately $157 million, excluding financing costs. Construction activities have started at all three sites, and these conversions are expected to be complete by the end of 2013.

Ÿ  

Subject to the receipt of certain regulatory approvals, Virginia Power plans to construct Brunswick County, which is expected to generate approximately 1,358 MW when operational. If the project is approved, commercial operations are expected to commence in 2016, at an estimated cost of approximately $1.3 billion, excluding financing costs. A

 

conditional use permit has been approved to allow for construction of the plant. Brunswick County would offset the expected reduction in capacity caused by the planned retirement of coal-fired units at Chesapeake and Yorktown by 2015 primarily due to the cost of compliance with MATS.

Ÿ  

Subject to the necessary regulatory approvals, Virginia Power plans to convert Bremo Units 3 and 4 from coal to natural gas. This project would preserve the 227 MW of capacity from the units and is expected to cost approximately $53 million, excluding financing costs. The conversion process is expected to be complete in 2014 in compliance with the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center air permit.

The Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center located in Wise County, Virginia started commercial operations in July 2012. The summer capacity of this clean coal generating facility is approximately 600 MW. The project cost was approximately $1.8 billion, excluding financing and supplemental costs.

In addition to the projects above, Virginia Power is considering the construction of a third nuclear unit at a site located at North Anna. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this project.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion

The generation capacity of Dominion’s merchant fleet totals 7,880 MW, including 3,954 MW of announced planned facility divestitures and decommissionings. The remaining generation mix is diversified and includes nuclear, gas, and renewables. Merchant generation facilities are located in Connecticut, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia with a majority of that capacity concentrated in New England.

Dominion continually reviews its portfolio of assets to determine which assets fit strategically and support its objectives to improve ROIC and shareholder value. In connection with these efforts, previously Dominion had announced its intention to retire State Line and Salem Harbor. During the second quarter of 2012, Dominion sold State Line, which ceased operations in March 2012, and in August 2012, Dominion completed the sale of Salem Harbor. In the third quarter of 2012, Dominion announced its intention to pursue the sale of its coal-fired merchant power stations, Brayton Point and Kincaid, and its 50% equity method investment in Elwood. In April 2011, Dominion announced the decision to pursue the sale of Kewaunee. In the fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced plans to close and decommission Kewaunee after the company was unable to find a buyer for the nuclear facility. Kewaunee is expected to cease power production in the second quarter of 2013 and commence decommissioning activities.

SOURCES OF ENERGY SUPPLY

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Dominion Generation uses a variety of fuels to power its electric generation and purchases power for utility system load requirements and to satisfy physical forward sale requirements, as described below. Some of these agreements have fixed commitments and are included as contractual obligations in Future Cash Payments for Contractual Obligations and Planned Capital Expenditures in Item 7. MD&A.

 

 

9

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Nuclear Fuel—Dominion Generation primarily utilizes long-term contracts to support its nuclear fuel requirements. Worldwide market conditions are continuously evaluated to ensure a range of supply options at reasonable prices which are dependent on the market environment. Current agreements, inventories and spot market availability are expected to support current and planned fuel supply needs. Additional fuel is purchased as required to ensure optimal cost and inventory levels.

Fossil Fuel—Dominion Generation primarily utilizes coal and natural gas in its fossil fuel plants.

Dominion Generation’s coal supply is obtained through long-term contracts and short-term spot agreements from both domestic and international suppliers.

Dominion Generation’s natural gas and oil supply is obtained from various sources including: purchases from major and independent producers in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast regions, purchases from local producers in the Appalachian area, purchases from gas marketers and withdrawals from underground storage fields owned by Dominion or third parties.

Dominion Generation manages a portfolio of natural gas transportation contracts (capacity) that allows flexibility in delivering natural gas to its gas turbine fleet, while minimizing costs.

Purchased Power—Dominion Generation purchases electricity from the PJM spot market and through power purchase agreements with other suppliers to provide for utility system load requirements.

Dominion Generation also occasionally purchases electricity from the PJM, ISO-NE and MISO spot markets to satisfy physical forward sale requirements as part of its merchant generation operations.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Virginia Power

Presented below is a summary of Virginia Power’s actual system output by energy source:

 

Source    2012     2011     2010  

Nuclear(1)

     33     28     28

Purchased power, net

     27        33        29   

Coal(2)

     22        26        31   

Natural gas

     17        12        10   

Other(3)

     1        1        2   

Total

     100     100     100

 

(1) Excludes ODEC’s 11.6% ownership interest in North Anna.
(2) Excludes ODEC’s 50.0% ownership interest in the Clover power station. The average cost of coal for 2012 Virginia in-system generation was $33.00 per MWh.
(3) Includes oil, hydro and biomass.

SEASONALITY

Sales of electricity for Dominion Generation typically vary seasonally as a result of the impact of changes in temperature and the availability of alternative sources for heating on demand by residential and commercial customers. Generally, the demand for electricity peaks during the summer and winter months to meet cooling and heating needs. An increase in heating degree days does not produce the same increase in revenue as an increase in cooling degree days, due to seasonal pricing differentials at Virginia Power and because alternative heating sources are more readily available.

NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING

In June 2011, the NRC amended its regulations to improve decommissioning planning. As applied to the operators of nuclear power plants, these amendments require licensees to conduct operations in a manner minimizing introduction of residual radioactivity into the site, perform additional surveys, and maintain records of their results. In addition, the amendments make minor changes to financial assurance methods and require additional information on decommissioning and spent fuel management costs after a plant permanently ceases operations. The revised regulations became effective in December 2012 and did not significantly affect the decommissioning cost estimates or funding for Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s units.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Virginia Power has a total of four licensed, operating nuclear reactors at Surry and North Anna in Virginia.

Decommissioning involves the decontamination and removal of radioactive contaminants from a nuclear power station once operations have ceased, in accordance with standards established by the NRC. Amounts collected from ratepayers and placed into trusts have been invested to fund the expected future costs of decommissioning the Surry and North Anna units.

Virginia Power believes that the decommissioning funds and their expected earnings for the Surry and North Anna units will be sufficient to cover expected decommissioning costs, particularly when combined with future ratepayer collections and contributions to these decommissioning trusts, if such future collections and contributions are required. This reflects the long-term investment horizon, since the units will not be decommissioned for decades, and a positive long-term outlook for trust fund investment returns. Virginia Power will continue to monitor these trusts to ensure they meet the NRC minimum financial assurance requirement, which may include the use of parent company guarantees, surety bonding or other financial guarantees recognized by the NRC.

The estimated cost to decommission Virginia Power’s four nuclear units is reflected in the table below and is primarily based upon site-specific studies completed in 2009. These cost studies are generally completed every four years. The current cost estimates assume decommissioning activities will begin shortly after cessation of operations, which will occur when the operating licenses expire. Virginia Power expects to decommission the Surry and North Anna units during the period 2032 to 2067.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion

In addition to the four nuclear units discussed above, Dominion has three licensed, operating nuclear reactors, two at Millstone in Connecticut and one at Kewaunee in Wisconsin. A third Millstone unit ceased operations before Dominion acquired the power station. In October 2012, Dominion announced that it plans to cease operations at Kewaunee in 2013 and commence decommissioning activities using the SAFSTOR methodology. The planned decommissioning completion date is 2073, which is within the NRC allowed 60 year window.

As part of Dominion’s acquisition of both Millstone and Kewaunee, it acquired decommissioning funds for the related units. Any funds remaining in Kewaunee’s trust after decom-

 

 

10        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

missioning is completed are required to be refunded to Wisconsin ratepayers. Dominion believes that the amounts currently available in the decommissioning trusts and their expected earnings will be sufficient to cover expected decommissioning costs for the Millstone and Kewaunee units. Dominion will continue to monitor these trusts to ensure they meet the NRC financial assurance requirements, which may include, if needed, the use of parent company guarantees, surety bonding or other financial guarantees recognized by the NRC. The estimated cost to decommission Dominion’s eight units is reflected in the table below and is primarily based upon site-specific studies completed in 2009, with the exception of Kewaunee for which a site-specific study was initiated in 2012 and subsequently finalized in early 2013. For the Millstone operating units, the current cost estimate assumes decommissioning activities will begin shortly after cessation of operations, which will occur when the operating licenses expire. Millstone Unit 1 is in SAFSTOR decommissioning status and will continue to be monitored until full decommissioning activities begin for the remaining Millstone operating units. Dominion expects to start minor decommissioning activities at Millstone Unit 2 in 2035, with full decommissioning of Millstone Units 1, 2 and 3 following the permanent cessation of operations of Millstone Unit 3 during the period 2045 to 2069.

The estimated decommissioning costs and license expiration dates for the nuclear units owned by Dominion and Virginia Power are shown in the following table:

 

     

NRC

license

expiration

year

    

Most

recent

cost

estimate

(2012

dollars)(1)

    

Funds in

trusts at

December 31,

2012

    

2012

contributions

to trusts

 
(dollars in millions)                            

Surry

           

Unit 1

     2032       $ 496       $ 429       $ 0.6   

Unit 2

     2033         520         422         0.6   

North Anna

           

Unit 1(2)

     2038         432         342         0.4   

Unit 2(2)

     2040         443         322         0.3   

Total (Virginia Power)

        1,891         1,515         1.9   

Millstone

           

Unit 1(3)

     n/a         455         356           

Unit 2

     2035         568         444           

Unit 3(4)

     2045         671         437           

Kewaunee

                

Unit 1

     2033         666         578           

Total (Dominion)

            $ 4,251       $ 3,330       $ 1.9   

 

(1) The cost estimates shown above reflect reductions for the expected future recovery of certain spent fuel costs based on the Companies’ contracts with the DOE for disposal of spent nuclear fuel consistent with the reductions reflected in Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning AROs.
(2) North Anna is jointly owned by Virginia Power (88.4%) and ODEC (11.6%). However, Virginia Power is responsible for 89.26% of the decommissioning obligation. Amounts reflect 89.26% of the decommissioning cost for both of North Anna’s units.
(3) Unit 1 permanently ceased operations in 1998, before Dominion’s acquisition of Millstone.
(4) Millstone Unit 3 is jointly owned by Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, with a 6.53% undivided interest in Unit 3 owned by Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and Green Mountain Power Corporation. Decommissioning cost is shown at Dominion’s ownership percentage. At December 31, 2012, the minority owners held approximately $28 million of trust funds related to Millstone Unit 3 that are not reflected in the table above.

Also see Note 14 and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about AROs and nuclear decommissioning, respectively.

Dominion Energy

Dominion Energy includes Dominion’s regulated natural gas distribution companies, regulated gas transmission pipeline and storage operations, natural gas gathering and by-products extraction activities, regulated LNG operations and its investment in the Blue Racer joint venture. Dominion Energy also includes producer services, which aggregates natural gas supply, engages in natural gas trading and marketing activities and natural gas supply management and provides price risk management services to Dominion affiliates.

The gas transmission pipeline and storage business serves gas distribution businesses and other customers in the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and Midwest. Included in Dominion’s gas transmission pipeline and storage business is its gas gathering and extraction activity, which sells extracted products at market rates. Dominion’s LNG operations involve the import and storage of LNG at Cove Point and the transportation of regasified LNG to the interstate pipeline grid and mid-Atlantic and Northeast markets. In connection with the recent increase in Eastern U.S. natural gas production, including from the Marcellus and Utica Shale formations, Dominion has requested regulatory authority to operate Cove Point as a bi-directional facility, able to import LNG, and vaporize it as natural gas, and liquefy natural gas and export it as LNG. See Future Issues and Other Matters in MD&A for more information. The Blue Racer joint venture will concentrate on building new gathering, processing, fractionation and NGL transportation assets as the development of the Utica Shale formation increases. Dominion will contribute to the joint venture a network of wet gas gathering assets, the Natrium extraction plant and other assets.

Revenue provided by Dominion’s regulated gas transmission and storage and LNG operations is based primarily on rates established by FERC. Additionally, Dominion receives revenue from firm fee-based contractual arrangements, including negotiated rates, for certain gas transportation, gas storage, LNG storage and regasification services. Dominion’s gas distribution operations serve residential, commercial and industrial gas sales, transportation and gathering service customers. Revenue provided by its gas distribution operations is based primarily on rates established by the Ohio and West Virginia Commissions. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on Dominion’s ability, through the rates it is permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on its capital investments. Variability in earnings results from operating and maintenance expenditures, as well as changes in rates and the demand for services, which are dependent on weather, changes in commodity prices and the economy.

In October 2008, East Ohio implemented a rate case settlement which provided for a straight-fixed-variable rate design for a majority of its customers. Under this rate design, East Ohio recovers a larger portion of its fixed operating costs through a flat monthly charge accompanied by a reduced volumetric base delivery rate. Accordingly, East Ohio’s revenue is less impacted by weather-related fluctuations in natural gas consumption than under the traditional rate design.

 

 

11

 


Table of Contents

 

 

 

Earnings from Dominion Energy’s producer services business are unregulated, and are subject to variability associated with changes in commodity prices. Producer services uses physical and financial arrangements to hedge this price risk.

COMPETITION

Dominion Energy’s gas transmission operations compete with domestic and Canadian pipeline companies. Dominion also competes with gas marketers seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage and other services. Alternative energy sources, such as oil or coal, provide another level of competition. Although competition is based primarily on price, the array of services that can be provided to customers is also an important factor. The combination of capacity rights held on certain long-line pipelines, a large storage capability and the availability of numerous receipt and delivery points along its own pipeline system enable Dominion to tailor its services to meet the needs of individual customers.

Retail competition for gas supply exists to varying degrees in the two states in which Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries operate. In Ohio, there has been no legislation enacted to require supplier choice for residential natural gas consumers. However, Dominion has offered an Energy Choice program to residential and commercial customers since October 2000. In January 2013, the Ohio Commission granted East Ohio’s motion to fully exit the merchant function for its nonresidential customers, beginning in April 2013, which will require those customers to choose a retail supplier or be assigned to one at a monthly variable rate set by the supplier. At December 31, 2012, approximately 1 million of Dominion’s 1.2 million Ohio customers were participating in this Energy Choice Program. West Virginia does not require customers to choose their provider in its retail natural gas markets at this time. See Regulation-State Regulations-Gas for additional information.

REGULATION

Dominion Energy’s natural gas transmission pipeline, storage and LNG operations are regulated primarily by FERC. Dominion Energy’s gas distribution service, including the rates that it may charge customers, is regulated by the Ohio and West Virginia Commissions. See State Regulations and Federal Regulations in Regulation for more information.

PROPERTIES

Dominion Energy’s gas distribution network is located in the states of Ohio and West Virginia. This network involves approximately 21,800 miles of pipe, exclusive of service lines of two inches in diameter or less. The rights-of-way grants for many natural gas pipelines have been obtained from the actual owners of real estate, as underlying titles have been examined. Where rights-of-way have not been obtained, they could be acquired from private owners by condemnation, if necessary. Many natural gas pipelines are on publicly-owned property, where company rights and actions are determined on a case-by-case basis, with results that range from reimbursed relocation to revocation of permission to operate.

Dominion Energy has approximately 11,000 miles of gas transmission, gathering and storage pipelines located in the states of Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. Dominion Energy operates gas processing and fractionation facilities in West Virginia with a total processing capacity of

267,000 mcf per day and fractionation capacity of 582,000 gallons per day. Dominion Energy also operates 20 underground gas storage fields located in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia, with almost 2,000 storage wells and approximately 349,000 acres of operated leaseholds.

The total designed capacity of the underground storage fields operated by Dominion Energy is approximately 947 bcf. Certain storage fields are jointly-owned and operated by Dominion Energy. The capacity of those fields owned by Dominion’s partners totals about 242 bcf. Dominion Energy also has about 15 bcf of above-ground storage capacity at Cove Point. Dominion Energy has 133 compressor stations with more than 832,000 installed compressor horsepower.

In 2012, DTI completed the Gathering Enhancement Project, a $200 million expansion of its natural gas gathering, processing and liquids facilities in West Virginia. The project is designed to increase the efficiency and reduce high pressures in its gathering system, thus increasing the amount of natural gas local producers can move through DTI’s West Virginia system.

In September 2012, DTI completed the $575 million Appalachian Gateway Project. The project provides approximately 484,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation services for new Appalachian gas supplies in West Virginia and southwestern Pennsylvania to an interconnection with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP at Oakford, Pennsylvania.

In November 2012, DTI completed the $97 million Northeast Expansion Project. The project provides approximately 200,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation services for CONSOL’s Marcellus Shale natural gas production from various receipt points in central and southwestern Pennsylvania to a nexus of market pipelines and storage facilities in Leidy, Pennsylvania.

In November 2012, DTI completed the $46 million Ellisburg-to-Craigs project. The project’s capacity of approximately 150,000 dekatherms per day is leased by TGP to move Marcellus Shale natural gas supplies from TGP’s 300 Line pipeline system in northern Pennsylvania to its 200 Line pipeline system in upstate New York.

In November 2011, DTI filed a FERC application for approval to construct the $17 million Sabinsville-to-Morrisville project, a pipeline to move additional Marcellus supplies from a TGP pipeline in northeast Pennsylvania to its line in upstate New York. DTI executed a binding precedent agreement with TGP in October 2010 to provide this firm transportation service up to 92,000 dekatherms per day for a 14-year term. Construction is expected to commence in April 2013 with an expected in service date of November 2013.

In December 2012, DTI received FERC authorization for the Allegheny Storage Project, which is expected to provide approximately 7.5 bcf of incremental storage service and 125,000 dekatherms per day of associated year-round firm transportation service to three local distribution companies under 15-year contracts. Storage capacity for the project will be provided from storage pool enhancements at DTI and capacity leased from East Ohio. DTI intends to construct additional compression facilities and upgrade measurement and regulation in order to provide 115,000 dekatherms per day of transportation service. The remaining 10,000 dekatherms per day of transportation service will not require construction of additional facilities. The $112 million project is expected to be in service in 2014.

 

 

12        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

In February 2011, DTI concluded a binding open season for its $67 million Tioga Area Expansion Project, which is designed to provide approximately 270,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation service from supply interconnects in Tioga and Potter Counties in Pennsylvania to DTI’s Crayne interconnect with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP in Greene County, Pennsylvania and the Leidy interconnect with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. Two customers have contracted for the service under 15-year terms. DTI filed a certificate application with FERC in November 2011. Subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals, the project is anticipated to be in service in November 2013.

In January 2011, Dominion announced the development of a natural gas processing and fractionation facility in Natrium, West Virginia, and in July 2011 it executed a contract for the construction of the first phase of the facility. This first phase of the project is fully contracted and is expected to be in service by March 2013. Once completed, the plant and related facilities are expected to be contributed into the Blue Racer joint venture. The Phase 1 costs for processing, fractionation, plant inlet and outlet natural gas transportation, gathering, and various modes of NGL transportation are approximately $550 million.

In May 2012, Dominion began construction of a $125 million pipeline project, which is included in the Natrium cost estimate above. The pipeline is designed to transport approximately 27,000 barrels per day of ethane from the Natrium facility to an interconnect with the ATEX line of Enterprise near Follansbee, West Virginia. Dominion NGL Pipelines, LLC, a subsidiary of Dominion, owns the 58-mile pipeline and associated equipment. Following the installation of the pipeline and the satisfaction of certain other conditions, Dominion NGL Pipelines, LLC is also expected to be contributed to Blue Racer. The facilities are anticipated to be available the later of January 1, 2014 or the date Enterprise commences operation of the ATEX line. Transportation services on the pipeline will be subject to FERC regulation under the Interstate Commerce Act.

In November 2012, DTI filed a FERC application for approval to construct the $42 million Natrium to Market project. The project is designed to provide 185,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation from an interconnect between DTI and the Natrium facility to DTI’s interconnect with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP in Greene County Pennsylvania. Four customers have entered into binding precedent agreements for the full project capacity under 8-year and 13-year terms. Subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals, the project is anticipated to be in service in November 2014.

In 2008, East Ohio began PIR, aimed at replacing approximately 20% of its pipeline system. The $2.7 billion, 25-year program is ongoing. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about PIR.

SOURCES OF ENERGY SUPPLY

Dominion Energy’s natural gas supply is obtained from various sources including purchases from major and independent producers in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast regions, local producers in the Appalachian area and gas marketers. Dominion’s large underground natural gas storage network and the location of its pipeline system are a significant link between the country’s major interstate gas pipelines and large markets in the Northeast

and mid-Atlantic regions. Dominion’s pipelines are part of an interconnected gas transmission system, which provides access to supplies nationwide for local distribution companies, marketers, power generators and industrial and commercial customers.

Dominion’s underground storage facilities play an important part in balancing gas supply with consumer demand and are essential to serving the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions. In addition, storage capacity is an important element in the effective management of both gas supply and pipeline transmission capacity.

SEASONALITY

Dominion Energy’s natural gas distribution business earnings vary seasonally, as a result of the impact of changes in temperature on demand by residential and commercial customers for gas to meet heating needs. Historically, the majority of these earnings have been generated during the heating season, which is generally from November to March; however implementation of the straight-fixed-variable rate design at East Ohio has reduced the earnings impact of weather-related fluctuations. Demand for services at Dominion’s pipeline and storage business can also be weather sensitive. Commodity prices can be impacted by seasonal weather changes, the effects of unusual weather events on operations and the economy. Dominion’s producer services business is affected by seasonal changes in the prices of commodities that it transports, stores and actively markets and trades.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and Other Segment—Virginia Power

Virginia Power’s Corporate and Other segment primarily includes certain specific items attributable to its operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

Corporate and Other Segment—Dominion

Dominion’s Corporate and Other segment includes its corporate, service company and other functions (including unallocated debt) and the net impact of operations that are expected to be and are currently discontinued, which is discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY

Dominion and Virginia Power are committed to being good environmental stewards. Their ongoing objective is to provide reliable, affordable energy for their customers while being environmentally responsible. The integrated strategy to meet this objective consists of five major elements:

Ÿ  

Compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules;

Ÿ  

Conservation and load management;

Ÿ  

Renewable generation development;

Ÿ  

Other generation development to maintain fuel diversity, including clean coal, advanced nuclear energy, and natural gas; and

Ÿ  

Improvements in other energy infrastructure.

 

 

13

 


Table of Contents

 

 

This strategy incorporates Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s efforts to voluntarily reduce GHG emissions, which are described below. See Dominion Generation—Properties for more information on certain of the projects described below, as well as other projects under current development. In addition to the environmental strategy described above, Dominion formed the AES department in April 2009 to conduct research in the renewable and alternative energy technologies sector and to support strategic investments to advance Dominion’s degree of understanding of such technologies.

Environmental Compliance

Dominion and Virginia Power remain committed to compliance with all applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules related to their operations. Additional information related to Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s environmental compliance matters can be found in Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A and in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Conservation and Load Management

Conservation plays a significant role in meeting the growing demand for electricity. The Regulation Act provides incentives for energy conservation and sets a voluntary goal for Virginia to reduce electricity consumption by retail customers in 2022 by ten percent of the amount consumed in 2006 through the implementation of conservation programs. Legislation in 2009 added definitions of peak-shaving and energy efficiency programs, and allowed for a margin on operating expenses and revenue reductions related to energy efficiency programs.

Virginia Power’s DSM programs provide important incremental steps toward achieving the voluntary ten percent energy conservation goal. The conservation and load management plan includes the following DSM programs, which were approved by the Virginia Commission in March 2010 and rolled out in May 2010:

Ÿ  

Residential Lighting Program—an instant, in-store discount on the purchase of qualifying compact fluorescent lights; this program ended in Virginia on December 31, 2011;

Ÿ  

Residential Low Income Program—free energy audit for income-qualifying customers, which identifies, installs improvements and suggests additional implementation measures that will help these customers save money on energy bills;

Ÿ  

Residential Air Conditioner Cycling Program—incentives for residential customers who allow Virginia Power to cycle their central air conditioners and heat pump systems during peak periods;

Ÿ  

Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade Program—incentives for commercial customers to improve the energy efficiency of their heating and/or cooling units; and

Ÿ  

Commercial Lighting Program—incentives for commercial customers to install energy-efficient lighting.

In September 2011, Virginia Power filed an application for approval of several DSM programs and for additional funding for the approved Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs, in addition to requesting annual recovery of DSM program costs. In April 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the following programs:

Ÿ  

Commercial Energy Audit Program—an on-site energy audit providing commercial customers information to evaluate potential energy cost savings options;

Ÿ  

Commercial Duct Testing & Sealing—an incentive for commercial customers to seal duct and air distribution systems to improve system efficiency;

Ÿ  

Commercial Distributed Generation—a program for customers to operate their on-site back-up generators when requested by Virginia Power during periods of peak demand; and

Ÿ  

Residential Bundle Program—a bundle of four residential programs to be available to qualifying residential customers, including the Residential Home Energy Check-up Program, Residential Duct Testing & Sealing Program, Residential Heat Pump Tune-Up Program and Residential Heat Pump Upgrade Program.

The Virginia Commission denied additional funding for the Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs. As a result, Virginia Power began winding down these programs in the second quarter of 2012. These two programs are no longer available in Virginia.

In August 2012, Virginia Power filed an application for approval to extend two residential DSM programs (the Air Conditioner Cycling program and the Low Income program) beyond April 30, 2013 for periods of five years and two years, respectively. Virginia Power also filed for approval of updated rate adjustment clauses for DSM program cost recovery, and for Electric Vehicle Pilot Program cost recovery. This case is pending.

In September 2010, Virginia Power filed with the North Carolina Commission an application for approval and its initial request for cost recovery of the five DSM programs initially approved in Virginia in 2010, as well as the distributed generation program. In February 2011, the North Carolina Commission approved the five DSM programs approved in Virginia, and Virginia Power subsequently launched the residential lighting program in May 2011 and the remainder of the approved Virginia DSM programs in June 2011. The Residential Lighting Program ended in North Carolina on December 31, 2011. In a separate order issued in September of 2011, the North Carolina Commission denied approval of Virginia Power’s proposed distributed generation program.

In August 2011, Virginia Power filed with the North Carolina Commission an application for approval and its updated request for cost recovery of the five DSM programs approved in North Carolina, as well as the then-pending distributed generation program. In December 2011, the North Carolina Commission approved updated cost recovery for the five DSM programs, as Virginia Power withdrew its cost recovery request for the distributed generation program. In a separate order issued in August 2012, the North Carolina Commission approved Virginia Power’s request to suspend the Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs which had been wound down and closed in Virginia.

In August 2012, Virginia Power filed with the North Carolina Commission an application for approval and its updated request for cost recovery for the five DSM programs approved in North Carolina, as well as cost recovery for projected costs of Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs on a North Carolina-only basis. In December 2012, the North Carolina Commission approved updated cost recovery for the five DSM programs, and requested an additional filing on whether the Commercial Lighting and the

 

 

14        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs will be offered on a North Carolina-only basis. Virginia Power made this additional filing in February 2013.

Virginia Power continues to evaluate opportunities to redesign current DSM programs and develop new DSM initiatives in Virginia and North Carolina.

Virginia Power is currently evaluating the effectiveness and benefits of installing AMI meters on homes and businesses throughout Virginia. The AMI meter demonstrations test the effectiveness of AMI meters in achieving voltage conservation, remotely turning off and on electric service, power outage and restoration detection and reporting, remote daily meter readings and offering dynamic rates. The AMI meter demonstrations are an on-going project that will help Virginia Power to further evaluate the technology and verify the potential impacts to its system.

Renewable Generation

Renewable energy is also an important component of a diverse and reliable energy mix. Both Virginia and North Carolina have passed legislation setting targets for renewable power. Virginia Power is committed to meeting Virginia’s goals of 12% of base year electric energy sales from renewable power sources by 2022, and 15% by 2025, and North Carolina’s RPS of 12.5% by 2021. In May 2010, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s participation in the state’s RPS program. As a participant, Virginia Power is permitted to seek recovery, through rate adjustment clauses, of the costs of programs designed to meet RPS goals. Virginia Power plans to meet the respective RPS targets in Virginia and North Carolina by utilizing existing renewable facilities, as well as through additional renewable generation. In addition, Virginia Power intends to purchase renewable energy certificates, as permitted by each RPS program, to help meet any remaining annual requirement needs, as well as to fund renewable energy research and development initiatives at Virginia institutions of higher education. Virginia Power continues to explore opportunities to develop new renewable facilities within its service territory, the energy attributes of which would potentially qualify for inclusion in the RPS programs. Virginia Power is converting three coal-fired Virginia generating power stations to biomass, which will increase Dominion’s renewable generation by more than 150 MW. The conversions are expected to be completed by the end of 2013. In November 2012, the Virginia Commission approved a voluntary demonstration program for Company-owned solar distributed generation facilities, to be located at selected commercial, industrial and community locations throughout its Virginia service territory.

Dominion has invested in wind energy through two joint ventures. Dominion is a 50% owner with Shell of NedPower. Dominion’s share of this project produces 132 MW of renewable energy. Dominion is also a 50% owner with BP of the first phase of Fowler Ridge, which has a generating capacity of 300 MW. Dominion has a long-term agreement with Fowler Ridge to purchase 200 MW of energy, capacity and environmental attributes from this first phase.

See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Other Generation Development

Virginia Power has announced a comprehensive generation growth program, referred to as Powering Virginia, which involves the development, financing, construction and operation of new

multi-fuel, multi-technology generation capacity to meet the anticipated growth in demand in its core market of Virginia. Virginia Power expects that these investments collectively will provide the following benefits: expanded electricity production capability, increased technological and fuel diversity and a reduction in the CO2 emission intensity of its generation fleet.

Improvements in Other Energy Infrastructure

Virginia Power’s five-year investment plan includes significant capital expenditures to upgrade or add new transmission and distribution lines, substations and other facilities to meet growing electricity demand within its service territory and maintain reliability. These enhancements are primarily aimed at meeting Virginia Power’s continued goal of providing reliable service, and are intended to address both continued population growth and increases in electricity consumption by the typical consumer. An additional benefit will be added capacity to efficiently deliver electricity from the renewable projects now being developed or to be developed in the future.

Virginia Power is taking measures to ensure that its electrical infrastructure can support the expected demand from electric vehicles, which have significantly lower carbon intensity than conventional vehicles. Virginia Power has partnered with Ford Motor Company to help prepare Virginia for the operation of electric vehicles, in a collaboration that involves consumer outreach, educational programs and the exchange of information on vehicle charging requirements. In July 2011, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s application to establish an Electric Vehicle Pilot Program, including two experimental and voluntary electric vehicle rate options.

Dominion, in connection with its five-year growth plan, is also pursuing the construction or upgrade of regulated infrastructure in its natural gas business.

Dominion and Virginia Power’s Strategy for Voluntarily Reducing GHG Emissions

While Dominion and Virginia Power have not established a standalone GHG emissions reduction target or timetable, they are actively engaged in voluntary reduction efforts, as well as working toward achieving required RPS standards established by existing state regulations, as set forth above. The Companies have an integrated voluntary strategy for reducing overall GHG emission intensity that is based on maintaining a diverse fuel mix, including nuclear, coal, gas, oil, hydro and renewable energy, investing in renewable energy projects and promoting energy conservation and efficiency efforts. Below are some of the Companies’ efforts that have or are expected to reduce the Companies’ overall carbon emissions or intensity:

Ÿ  

Since 2000, Dominion has added approximately 3,300 MW of non-emitting generation and over 5,000 MW of lower-emitting natural gas-fired generation, including over 3,000 MW at Virginia Power, to its generation mix.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power added 83 MW of renewable biomass and is converting three coal-fired power stations to biomass, which is anticipated to be considered carbon neutral by regulatory agencies.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power has requested approval from the Virginia Commission to convert Bremo Units 3 and 4 from coal to natural gas.

 

 

15

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Ÿ  

Dominion has over 800 MW of wind energy in operation or development.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power is constructing the natural gas-fired Warren County power station.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power has filed an application with the Virginia Commission for approval to construct an additional combined-cycle natural gas-fired power station and related transmission interconnection facilities in Brunswick County.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power has stated that coal-fired units at Chesapeake and Yorktown are planned to be retired by 2015.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power has received an Early Site Permit from the NRC for the possible addition of approximately 1,500 MW of nuclear generation in Virginia. Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power has developed and implemented the DSM programs described above.

Ÿ  

Virginia Power has initiated a demonstration of smart grid technologies as described above.

Ÿ  

In October 2011, Virginia Power announced plans to develop a community solar power program.

Ÿ  

In 2012, Dominion sold Salem Harbor and State Line, two coal-and fuel oil-fired facilities.

Ÿ  

In the third quarter of 2012, Dominion announced its intention to pursue the sale of its coal-fired merchant power stations, Brayton Point and Kincaid.

Ÿ  

In December 2012, Dominion announced its plans to develop a 15 MW fuel cell power generating facility in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

While Virginia Power’s new Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center, which started commercial operations in July 2012, is a new source of GHG emissions, Virginia Power has taken steps to minimize the impact on the environment. The new plant is expected to use at least 10% biomass for fuel and is designed to be carbon-capture compatible, meaning that technology to capture CO2 can be added to the station if or when it becomes commercially available. It is currently estimated that the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center will have the potential to emit about 4.8 million metric tonnes of direct CO2 emissions in a year assuming a 100% capacity factor and 100% coal-fired operation. Actual emissions will depend on the capacity factor of the facility and the extent to which biomass is burned.

Dominion also developed a comprehensive GHG inventory for calendar year 2011. For Dominion Generation, Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s direct CO2 equivalent emissions, based on equity share (ownership), were approximately 42.1 million metric tonnes and 25.9 million metric tonnes, respectively, in 2011. The decrease in emissions from 2010 to 2011 is proportional to a decrease in generated MW, due mainly to lower demand and milder weather in 2011. For the DVP operating segment’s electric transmission and distribution operations, direct CO2 equivalent emissions for 2011 stayed the same as in 2010 at 0.2 million metric tonnes. For 2011, DTI’s (including Cove Point) direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 1.2 million metric tonnes and East Ohio’s direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 1.1 million metric tonnes. The emissions appear to have decreased significantly compared to previous year’s inventories. These differences may not be comparable, however, due to a change in calculation methodologies required under the

EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98. Dominion’s GHG inventory now follows all methodologies specified in the EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98 for calculating emissions.

Since 2000, the Companies have tracked the emissions of their electric generation fleet. Their electric generation fleet employs a mix of fuel and renewable energy sources. Comparing annual year 2000 to annual year 2011, Dominion and Virginia Power’s electric generating fleet (based on ownership percentage) reduced their average CO2 emissions rate per MWh of energy produced from electric generation by about 29% and 18%, respectively. During such time period, the capacity of Dominion and Virginia Power’s electric generation fleet has grown. The Companies do not yet have final 2012 emissions data.

Alternative Energy Initiatives

The AES department conducts research in the renewable and alternative energy technologies sector and supports strategic investments to advance Dominion’s degree of understanding of such technologies. AES participates in federal and state policy development on alternative energy and identifies potential alternative energy resource and technology opportunities for Dominion’s business units. For example, in December 2012, Virginia Power was selected by the DOE to begin negotiations for initial engineering, design and permitting work for a wind turbine demonstration facility approximately 24 miles off the coast of Virginia. The proposed 12 MW grid-connected facility would generate power via two turbines mounted on foundations driven into the ocean floor. In March 2011, Dominion issued a report evaluating high-voltage underwater transmission lines from Virginia Beach into the ocean to support multiple offshore wind farms; the first of many steps with the goal being the development of a transmission line making offshore wind resources available to its customers. A 2010 Dominion study of its existing transmission system in eastern Virginia showed that it is possible to interconnect large scale wind facilities up to an installed capability of 4,500 MW.

In 2012, Dominion continued to enhance and refine its EDGE® grid-side efficiency product suite. EDGE® is a modular and adaptive conservation voltage management solution enabling utilities to deploy incremental grid-side energy management that requires no behavioral changes or purchases by end customers. In February 2013, Dominion was awarded a patent relating to the EDGE® technology.

 

 

REGULATION

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission, North Carolina Commission, SEC, FERC, EPA, DOE, NRC, Army Corps of Engineers and other federal, state and local authorities.

 

 

16        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

State Regulations

ELECTRIC

Virginia Power’s electric utility retail service is subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission.

Virginia Power holds certificates of public convenience and necessity which authorize it to maintain and operate its electric facilities now in operation and to sell electricity to customers. However, Virginia Power may not construct generating facilities or large capacity transmission lines without the prior approval of various state and federal government agencies. In addition, the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission regulate Virginia Power’s transactions with affiliates, transfers of certain facilities and the issuance of certain securities.

Electric Regulation in Virginia

The enactment of the Regulation Act in 2007 significantly changed electric service regulation in Virginia by instituting a modified cost-of-service rate model. With respect to most classes of customers, the Regulation Act ended Virginia’s planned transition to retail competition for its electric supply service. Base rates are set by a process that allows Virginia Power to recover its operating costs and an ROIC. The Virginia Commission reviews Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions for generation and distribution services on a biennial basis in a proceeding that involves the determination of Virginia Power’s actual earned ROE during a combined two-year historic test period, and the determination of Virginia Power’s authorized ROE prospectively. If, as a result of the earnings test review, the Virginia Commission determines that Virginia Power’s historic earnings for the two-year test period are more than 50 basis points above the authorized level, 60% or 100% of earnings above this level must be shared with customers through a refund process. Under certain circumstances described in the Regulation Act, the Virginia Commission may also order a base rate increase or reduction during the biennial review. Circumstances where the Virginia Commission may order a base rate decrease include a determination by the Virginia Commission that Virginia Power has exceeded its authorized level of earnings by more than 50 basis points for two consecutive biennial review periods. Virginia Power’s authorized ROE can be set no lower than the average, for a three-year historic period, of the actual returns reported to the SEC by not less than a majority of comparable utilities within the Southeastern U.S., with certain limitations as described in the Regulation Act. Virginia Power’s ROE may be increased or decreased by up to 100 basis points based on operating performance criteria, or alternatively, will be increased by 50 basis points for compliance with Virginia’s RPS.

In addition, the Regulation Act authorizes stand-alone rate adjustment clauses for recovery of costs for new generation facilities or major unit modifications of existing facilities, FERC-approved transmission costs, environmental compliance, conservation and energy efficiency programs and renewable energy programs. It provides for enhanced returns on capital expenditures relating to the construction or major modification of facilities that are nuclear-powered, clean coal/carbon capture compatible-powered, or renewable-powered, as well as conventional coal and combined-cycle combustion turbine facilities.

Costs of fuel used for the generation of electricity, along with costs of purchased power, are recovered from customers through an annually approved fuel rider, as provided under a separate section of the Virginia Code. Decisions of the Virginia Commission may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.

If the Virginia Commission’s future rate decisions, including actions relating to Virginia Power’s rate adjustment clause filings, differ materially from Virginia Power’s expectations, it could adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

See Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A for changes to the Regulation Act enacted in 2013.

See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Electric Regulation in North Carolina

Virginia Power’s retail electric base rates in North Carolina are regulated on a cost-of-service/rate-of-return basis subject to North Carolina statutes and the rules and procedures of the North Carolina Commission. North Carolina base rates are set by a process that allows Virginia Power to recover its operating costs and an ROIC. If retail electric earnings exceed the authorized ROE established by the North Carolina Commission, retail electric rates may be subject to review and possible reduction by the North Carolina Commission, which may decrease Virginia Power’s future earnings. Additionally, if the North Carolina Commission does not allow recovery of costs incurred in providing service on a timely basis, Virginia Power’s future earnings could be negatively impacted. Fuel rates are subject to revision under annual fuel cost adjustment proceedings.

Virginia Power’s transmission service rates in North Carolina are regulated by the North Carolina Commission as part of Virginia Power’s bundled retail service to North Carolina customers.

In March 2012, Virginia Power filed an application with the North Carolina Commission to increase base non-fuel revenues with January 1, 2013 as the proposed effective date for the permanent rate revision. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

GAS

Dominion’s gas distribution services are regulated by the Ohio Commission and the West Virginia Commission.

Status of Competitive Retail Gas Services

Both of the states in which Dominion has gas distribution operations have considered legislation regarding a competitive deregulation of natural gas sales at the retail level.

Ohio—Since October 2000, East Ohio has offered the Energy Choice program, under which residential and commercial customers are encouraged to purchase gas directly from retail suppliers or through a community aggregation program. In October 2006, East Ohio restructured its commodity service by entering into gas purchase contracts with selected suppliers at a fixed price above the NYMEX month-end settlement and passing that gas cost to customers under the Standard Service Offer program. Starting in April 2009, East Ohio buys natural gas under the Standard Service Offer program only for customers not eligible to participate in the Energy Choice program and places

 

 

17

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Energy Choice-eligible customers in a direct retail relationship with selected suppliers, which is designated on the customers’ bills.

In January 2013, the Ohio Commission granted East Ohio’s motion to fully exit the merchant function for its nonresidential customers, beginning in April 2013, which will require those customers to choose a retail supplier or be assigned to one at a monthly variable rate set by the supplier. At December 31, 2012, approximately 1.0 million of Dominion’s 1.2 million Ohio customers were participating in the Energy Choice program. Subject to the Ohio Commission’s approval, East Ohio may eventually exit the gas merchant function in Ohio entirely and have all customers select an alternate gas supplier. East Ohio continues to be the provider of last resort in the event of default by a supplier. Large industrial customers in Ohio also source their own natural gas supplies.

West Virginia—At this time, West Virginia has not enacted legislation to require customers to choose in the retail natural gas markets served by Hope. However, the West Virginia Commission has issued regulations to govern pooling services, one of the tools that natural gas suppliers may utilize to provide retail customers a choice in the future and has issued rules requiring competitive gas service providers to be licensed in West Virginia.

Rates

Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries are subject to regulation of rates and other aspects of their businesses by the states in which they operate—Ohio and West Virginia. When necessary, Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries seek general base rate increases to recover increased operating costs and a fair return on rate base investments. Base rates are set based on the cost of service by rate class. A straight-fixed-variable rate design, in which the majority of operating costs are recovered through a monthly charge rather than a volumetric charge, is utilized to establish rates for a majority of East Ohio’s customers pursuant to a 2008 rate case settlement. Base rates for Hope are designed primarily based on rate design methodology in which the majority of operating costs are recovered through volumetric charges. In addition to general rate increases, Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries make routine separate filings with their respective state regulatory commissions to reflect changes in the costs of purchased gas. The majority of these purchased gas costs are subject to rate recovery

through a mechanism that ensures dollar for dollar recovery of prudently incurred costs. Costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates are deferred as regulatory assets. The purchased gas cost recovery filings generally cover prospective one-, three- or twelve-month periods. Approved increases or decreases in gas cost recovery rates result in increases or decreases in revenues with corresponding increases or decreases in net purchased gas cost expenses. The Ohio Commission has also approved several stand-alone cost recovery mechanisms to recover specified costs and a return for infrastructure projects and certain other costs that vary widely over time; such costs are excluded from general base rates. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Federal Regulations

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Electric

Under the Federal Power Act, FERC regulates wholesale sales and transmission of electricity in interstate commerce by public utilities. Virginia Power purchases and sells electricity in the PJM wholesale market and Dominion’s merchant generators sell electricity in the PJM, MISO and ISO-NE wholesale markets under Dominion’s market-based sales tariffs authorized by FERC. In addition, Virginia Power has FERC approval of a tariff to sell wholesale power at capped rates based on its embedded cost of generation. This cost-based sales tariff could be used to sell to loads within or outside Virginia Power’s service territory. Any such sales would be voluntary.

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to FERC’s Standards of Conduct that govern conduct between transmission function employees of interstate gas and electricity transmission providers and the marketing function employees of their affiliates. The rule defines the scope of transmission and marketing-related functions that are covered by the standards and is designed to prevent transmission providers from giving their affiliates undue preferences.

Dominion and Virginia Power are also subject to FERC’s affiliate restrictions that (1) prohibit power sales between Virginia Power and Dominion’s merchant plants without first receiving FERC authorization, (2) require the merchant plants and Virginia Power to conduct their wholesale power sales operations separately, and (3) prohibit Virginia Power from sharing market information with merchant plant operating personnel. The rules are designed to prohibit Virginia Power from giving the merchant plants a competitive advantage.

EPACT included provisions to create an ERO. The ERO is required to promulgate mandatory reliability standards governing the operation of the bulk power system in the U.S. FERC has certified NERC as the ERO and also issued an initial order approving many reliability standards that went into effect in 2007. Entities that violate standards will be subject to fines of between $1 thousand and $1 million per day, and can also be assessed non-monetary penalties, depending upon the nature and severity of the violation.

Dominion and Virginia Power plan and operate their facilities in compliance with approved NERC reliability requirements. Dominion and Virginia Power employees participate on various NERC committees, track the development and implementation of standards, and maintain proper compliance registration with NERC’s regional organizations. Dominion and Virginia Power anticipate incurring additional compliance expenditures over the next several years as a result of the implementation of new cybersecurity programs as well as efforts to ensure appropriate facility ratings for Virginia Power’s transmission lines. In October 2010, NERC issued an industry alert identifying possible discrepancies between the design and actual field conditions of transmission facilities as a potential reliability issue. The alert recommends that entities review their current facilities rating methodology to verify that the methodology is based on actual field conditions, rather than solely on design documents, and to take corrective action if necessary. Virginia Power is evaluating its transmission facilities for any discrepancies between design and

 

 

18        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

actual field conditions. In addition, NERC has requested the industry to increase the number of assets subject to NERC reliability standards that are designated as critical assets, including cybersecurity assets. While Dominion and Virginia Power expect to incur additional compliance costs in connection with the above NERC requirements and initiatives, such expenses are not expected to significantly affect results of operations.

In April 2008, FERC granted an application for Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations to establish a forward-looking formula rate mechanism that updates transmission rates on an annual basis and approved an ROE of 11.4%, effective as of January 1, 2008. The formula rate is designed to recover the expected revenue requirement for each calendar year and is updated based on actual costs. The FERC-approved formula method, which is based on projected costs, allows Virginia Power to earn a current return on its growing investment in electric transmission infrastructure.

Gas

FERC regulates the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, as amended. Under the Natural Gas Act, FERC has authority over rates, terms and conditions of services performed by Dominion’s interstate natural gas company subsidiaries, including DTI and Cove Point. FERC also has jurisdiction over siting, construction and operation of natural gas import facilities and interstate natural gas pipeline facilities.

Dominion’s interstate gas transmission and storage activities are generally conducted on an open access basis, in accordance with certificates, tariffs and service agreements on file with FERC.

Dominion is also subject to the Pipeline Safety Acts of 2002 and 2011, which mandate inspections of interstate and intrastate natural gas transmission and storage pipelines, particularly those located in areas of high-density population. Dominion has evaluated its natural gas transmission and storage properties, as required by the Department of Transportation regulations under these Acts, and has implemented a program of identification, testing and potential remediation activities. These activities are ongoing.

See Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Environmental Regulations

Each of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operating segments faces substantial laws, regulations and compliance costs with respect to environmental matters. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations authorize the imposition of substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. The cost of complying with applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules is expected to be material to the Companies. If expenditures for pollution control technologies and associated operating costs are not recoverable from customers through regulated rates (in regulated jurisdictions) or market prices (in deregulated jurisdictions), those costs could adversely affect future results of operations and cash flows. Dominion and Virginia Power have applied for or obtained the necessary environmental permits for the operation of their facilities. Many of these permits are subject to reissuance and continuing review. For a discussion of significant aspects of these matters, including current and planned

capital expenditures relating to environmental compliance required to be discussed in this Item, see Environmental Matters in Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Additional information can also be found in Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

The national and international attention in recent years on GHG emissions and their relationship to climate change has resulted in federal, regional and state legislative or regulatory action in this area. Dominion and Virginia Power support national climate change legislation that would provide a consistent, economy-wide approach to addressing this issue and are currently taking action to protect the environment and address climate change while meeting the future needs of their growing service territory. Dominion’s CEO and operating segment CEOs are responsible for compliance with the laws and regulations governing environmental matters, including climate change, and Dominion’s Board of Directors receives periodic updates on these matters. See Environmental Strategy above, Environmental Matters in Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on climate change legislation and regulation, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

All aspects of the operation and maintenance of Dominion’s and Virginia Powers’ nuclear power stations are regulated by the NRC. Operating licenses issued by the NRC are subject to revocation, suspension or modification, and the operation of a nuclear unit may be suspended if the NRC determines that the public interest, health or safety so requires.

From time to time, the NRC adopts new requirements for the operation and maintenance of nuclear facilities. In many cases, these new regulations require changes in the design, operation and maintenance of existing nuclear facilities. If the NRC adopts such requirements in the future, it could result in substantial increases in the cost of operating and maintaining Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear generating units. See Nuclear Matters in Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7 MD&A for further information.

The NRC also requires Dominion and Virginia Power to decontaminate their nuclear facilities once operations cease. This process is referred to as decommissioning, and the Companies are required by the NRC to be financially prepared. For information on decommissioning trusts, see Dominion Generation-Nuclear Decommissioning and Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on spent nuclear fuel.

 

 

CYBERSECURITY

In an effort to reduce the likelihood and severity of cyber intrusions, the Companies have a comprehensive cybersecurity program designed to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data and systems. In addition, Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to mandatory cybersecurity regulatory requirements, interface regularly with a wide range of external organizations, and participate in classified briefings to maintain an awareness of current cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities. The Companies’ current security posture and regulatory compliance efforts are intended to address the evolving and changing cyber threats.

 

 

19

 


Table of Contents

 

 

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and are often beyond their control. A number of these factors have been identified below. For other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement or projection contained in this report, see Forward-Looking Statements in Item 7. MD&A.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s results of operations can be affected by changes in the weather. Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and natural gas, and affect the price of energy commodities. In addition, severe weather, including hurricanes and winter storms, can be destructive, causing outages and property damage that require incurring additional expenses. Changes in weather conditions can result in reduced water levels or changes in water temperatures that could adversely affect operations at some of the Companies’ power stations. Furthermore, the Companies’ operations could be adversely affected and their physical plant placed at greater risk of damage should changes in global climate produce, among other possible conditions, unusual variations in temperature and weather patterns, resulting in more intense, frequent and extreme weather events, abnormal levels of precipitation and, for operations located on or near coastlines, a change in sea level or sea temperatures.

The rates of Dominion’s gas transmission and distribution operations and Virginia Power’s electric transmission, distribution and generation operations are subject to regulatory review. Revenue provided by Virginia Power’s electric transmission, distribution and generation operations and Dominion’s gas transmission and distribution operations is based primarily on rates approved by state and federal regulatory agencies. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on their ability, through the rates that they are permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable rate of return on their capital investment.

Virginia Power’s wholesale rates for electric transmission service are adjusted on an annual basis through operation of a FERC-approved formula rate mechanism. Through this mechanism, Virginia Power’s wholesale electric transmission cost of service is estimated and thereafter adjusted to reflect Virginia Power’s actual electric transmission costs incurred. These wholesale rates are subject to FERC review and prospective adjustment in the event that customers and/or interested state commissions file a complaint with FERC and are able to demonstrate that Virginia Power’s wholesale revenue requirement is no longer just and reasonable.

Similarly, various rates and charges assessed by Dominion’s gas transmission businesses are subject to review by FERC. In addition, the rates of Dominion’s gas distribution businesses are subject to state regulatory review in the jurisdictions in which they operate.

Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions for generation and distribution services to customers in Virginia are reviewed by the Virginia Commission on a biennial basis in a proceeding that involves the determination of Virginia Power’s actual earned ROE during a combined two-year historic test period, and the determination of Virginia Power’s authorized ROE prospectively. Under certain circumstances described in the Regulation Act, Virginia Power may be required to share a portion of its earnings with customers through a refund process, and the Virginia Commission may order a base rate increase or reduction during the biennial review. Additionally, Virginia

Power was required to discontinue deferral accounting for certain existing rate adjustment clauses as of December 1, 2011. As a result, Virginia Power may potentially not fully recover costs associated with these existing rate adjustment clauses.

Virginia Power’s retail electric base rates for bundled generation, transmission, and distribution services to customers in North Carolina are regulated on a cost-of-service/rate-of-return basis subject to North Carolina statutes, and the rules and procedures of the North Carolina Commission. If retail electric earnings exceed the returns established by the North Carolina Commission, retail electric rates may be subject to review and possible reduction by the North Carolina Commission, which may decrease Virginia Power’s future earnings. Additionally, if the North Carolina Commission does not allow recovery through base rates, on a timely basis, of costs incurred in providing service, Virginia Power’s future earnings could be negatively impacted.

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to complex governmental regulation that could adversely affect their results of operations and subject the Companies to monetary penalties. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation and require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from various governmental agencies. These operations are also subject to legislation governing taxation at the federal, state and local level. They must also comply with environmental legislation and associated regulations. Management believes that the necessary approvals have been obtained for existing operations and that the business is conducted in accordance with applicable laws. The Companies’ businesses are subject to regulatory regimes which could result in substantial monetary penalties if either Dominion or Virginia Power is found not to be in compliance, including mandatory reliability standards and interaction in the wholesale markets. New laws or regulations, the revision or reinterpretation of existing laws or regulations, or penalties imposed for non-compliance with existing laws or regulations may result in substantial expense.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s generation business may be negatively affected by possible FERC actions that could change market design in the wholesale markets or affect pricing rules or revenue calculations in the RTO markets. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s generation stations operating in RTO markets sell capacity, energy and ancillary services into wholesale electricity markets regulated by FERC. The wholesale markets allow these generation stations to take advantage of market price opportunities, but also expose them to market risk. Properly functioning competitive wholesale markets depend upon FERC’s continuation of clearly identified market rules. From time to time FERC may investigate and authorize RTOs to make changes in market design. FERC also periodically reviews Dominion’s authority to sell at market-based rates. Material changes by FERC to the design of the wholesale markets, Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s authority to sell power at market-based rates, or changes to pricing rules or rules involving revenue calculations, could adversely impact the future results of Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s generation business.

Dominion and Virginia Power infrastructure build plans often require regulatory approval before construction can commence. Dominion and Virginia Power may not complete plant construction or expansion projects that they commence, or they may complete projects on materially different terms or timing than initially anticipated, and they may not be able to achieve the intended benefits of any such project, if completed. Several plant construction and expansion projects have been announced and additional projects may be considered in the

 

 

20        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

future. Commencing construction on announced plants requires approvals from applicable state and federal agencies. Projects may not be able to be completed on time as a result of weather conditions, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain regulatory approvals, delays in obtaining key materials, labor difficulties, difficulties with partners or potential partners, a decline in the credit strength of their counterparties or vendors, or other factors beyond their control. Even if plant construction and expansion projects are completed, the total costs of the projects may be higher than anticipated and the performance of the business of Dominion and Virginia Power following the projects may not meet expectations. Additionally, Dominion and Virginia Power may not be able to timely and effectively integrate the projects into their operations and such integration may result in unforeseen operating difficulties or unanticipated costs. Further, regulators may disallow recovery of some of the costs of a project if they are deemed not to be prudently incurred. Any of these or other factors could adversely affect the Companies’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the plant construction and expansion projects.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s current costs of compliance with environmental laws are significant. The costs of compliance with future environmental laws, including laws and regulations designed to address global climate change, air quality, coal combustion by-products, cooling water and other matters could make certain of the Companies’ generation facilities uneconomical to maintain or operate. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations relating to air quality, water quality, waste management, natural resources, and health and safety. Compliance with these legal requirements requires the Companies to commit significant capital toward permitting, emission fees, environmental monitoring, installation and operation of pollution control equipment and purchase of allowances and/or offsets. Additionally, the Companies could be responsible for expenses relating to remediation and containment obligations, including at sites where they have been identified by a regulatory agency as a potentially responsible party. Expenditures relating to environmental compliance have been significant in the past, and Dominion and Virginia Power expect that they will remain significant in the future.

Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and/or new laws may be adopted or become applicable to Dominion or Virginia Power. The EPA is expected to issue additional regulations with respect to air quality under the CAA, including revised NAAQS and regulations governing the emissions of GHGs from electric generating units. Risks relating to potential regulation of GHG emissions are discussed below. Dominion and Virginia Power also expect additional federal water and waste regulations, including regulations concerning cooling water intake structures and coal combustion by-product handling and disposal practices that are expected to be applicable to at least some of its generating facilities.

Compliance costs cannot be estimated with certainty due to the inability to predict the requirements and timing of implementation of any new environmental rules or regulations. Other factors which affect the ability to predict future environmental expenditures with certainty include the difficulty in estimating clean-up costs and quantifying liabilities under environmental laws that impose joint and several liability on all responsible parties. However, such expenditures, if material, could make the Companies’ facilities uneconomical to operate, result in the impairment of assets, or otherwise adversely affect Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s results of operations, financial performance or liquidity.

If additional federal and/or state requirements are imposed on energy companies mandating limitations on GHG emissions or requiring efficiency improvements, such requirements may result in compliance costs that alone or in combination could make some of Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s electric generation units or natural gas facilities uneconomical to maintain or operate. The EPA, environmental advocacy groups, other organizations and some state and other federal agencies are focusing considerable attention on GHG emissions from power generation facilities and their potential role in climate change. Dominion and Virginia Power expect that additional EPA regulations, and possibly additional state legislation and/or regulations, may be issued resulting in the imposition of additional limitations on GHG emissions or requiring efficiency improvements from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.

There are also potential impacts on Dominion’s natural gas businesses as federal or state GHG legislation or regulations may require GHG emission reductions from the natural gas sector and could affect demand for natural gas. Additionally, GHG requirements could result in increased demand for energy conservation and renewable products. Several regions of the U.S. have moved forward with GHG emission regulations including regions where Dominion has operations. For example, Massachusetts and Rhode Island have implemented regulations requiring reductions in CO2 emissions through RGGI, a cap and trade program covering CO2 emissions from power plants in the Northeast, which affects several of Dominion’s facilities.

Compliance with GHG emission reduction requirements may require increasing the energy efficiency of equipment at facilities, committing significant capital toward carbon capture and storage technology, purchase of allowances and/or offsets, fuel switching, and/or retirement of high-emitting generation facilities and potential replacement with lower emitting generation facilities. The cost of compliance with GHG emission legislation and/or regulation is subject to significant uncertainties due to the outcome of several interrelated assumptions and variables, including timing of the implementation of rules, required levels of reductions, allocation requirements of the new rules, the maturation and commercialization of carbon capture and storage technology, and the selected compliance alternatives. The Companies cannot estimate the aggregate effect of such requirements on their results of operations, financial condition or their customers. However, such expenditures, if material, could make the Companies’ generation facilities uneconomical to operate, result in the impairment of assets, or otherwise adversely affect Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s results of operations, financial performance or liquidity.

Risks arising from the reliability of the Companies’ facilities supply chain disruptions or personnel issues could result in lost revenues and increased expenses, including higher maintenance costs. Operation of the Companies’ facilities involves risk, including the risk of potential breakdown or failure of equipment or processes due to aging infrastructure, fuel supply or transportation disruptions, accidents, labor disputes or work stoppages by employees, acts of terrorism or sabotage, construction delays or cost overruns, shortages of or delays in obtaining equipment, material and labor, operational restrictions resulting from environmental limitations and governmental interventions, and performance below expected levels. In addition, weather-related incidents, earthquakes and other natural disasters can disrupt operation of the Companies’ facilities. Because Virginia Power’s transmission facilities are interconnected with those of third parties, the operation of its facilities could be adversely affected by unexpected or uncontrollable events occurring on the systems of such third parties.

 

 

21

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Operation of the Companies’ facilities below expected capacity levels could result in lost revenues and increased expenses, including higher maintenance costs. Unplanned outages of the Companies’ facilities and extensions of scheduled outages due to mechanical failures or other problems occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of the Companies’ business. Unplanned outages typically increase the Companies’ operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce their revenues as a result of selling less output or may require the Companies to incur significant costs as a result of operating higher cost units or obtaining replacement output from third parties in the open market to satisfy forward energy and capacity or other contractual obligations. Moreover, if the Companies are unable to perform their contractual obligations, penalties or liability for damages could result.

Dominion and Virginia Power have substantial ownership interests in and operate nuclear generating units; as a result, each may incur substantial costs and liabilities. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear facilities are subject to operational, environmental, health and financial risks such as the on-site storage of spent nuclear fuel, the ability to dispose of such spent nuclear fuel, the ability to maintain adequate reserves for decommissioning, limitations on the amounts and types of insurance available, potential operational liabilities and extended outages, the costs of replacement power, the costs of maintenance and the costs of securing the facilities against possible terrorist attacks. Dominion and Virginia Power maintain decommissioning trusts and external insurance coverage to minimize the financial exposure to these risks; however, it is possible that future decommissioning costs could exceed amounts in the decommissioning trusts and/or damages could exceed the amount of insurance coverage. If Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s decommissioning trust funds are insufficient, and they are not allowed to recover the additional costs incurred through insurance, or in the case of Virginia Power through regulatory mechanisms, their results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear facilities are also subject to complex government regulation which could negatively impact their results of operations. The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generating facilities. In the event of noncompliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines, set license conditions, shut down a nuclear unit, or take some combination of these actions, depending on its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. Revised safety requirements promulgated by the NRC could require Dominion and Virginia Power to make substantial expenditures at their nuclear plants. In addition, although the Companies have no reason to anticipate a serious nuclear incident at their plants, if an incident did occur, it could materially and adversely affect their results of operations and/or financial condition. A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world, such as the nuclear events in Japan in 2011, could cause the NRC to adopt increased safety regulations or otherwise limit or restrict the operation or licensing of domestic nuclear units.

Dominion depends on third parties to produce the natural gas it gathers and processes, and the NGLs it fractionates at its facilities. A reduction in these quantities could reduce Dominion’s revenues. Dominion obtains its supply of natural gas and NGLs from numerous third-party producers. Such producers are under no obligation to deliver a specific quantity of natural gas or NGLs to Dominion’s facilities, although the producers that have con-

tracted to supply natural gas to Dominion’s natural gas processing and fractionation facility under development in Natrium, West Virginia will generally be subject to contractual minimum fee payments. If producers were to decrease the supply of natural gas or NGLs to Dominion’s systems and facilities for any reason, Dominion could experience lower revenues to the extent it is unable to replace the lost volumes on similar terms.

Dominion’s merchant power business is operating in a challenging market, which could adversely affect its results of operations and future growth. The success of Dominion’s merchant power business depends upon favorable market conditions including the ability to sell power at prices sufficient to cover its operating costs. Dominion operates in active wholesale markets that expose it to price volatility for electricity and fuel as well as the credit risk of counterparties. Dominion attempts to manage its price risk by entering into hedging transactions, including short-term and long-term fixed price sales and purchase contracts.

In these wholesale markets, the spot market price of electricity for each hour is generally determined by the cost of supplying the next unit of electricity to the market during that hour. In many cases, the next unit of electricity supplied would be provided by generating stations that consume fossil fuels, primarily natural gas. Consequently, the open market wholesale price for electricity generally reflects the cost of natural gas plus the cost to convert the fuel to electricity. Therefore, changes in the price of natural gas generally affect the open market wholesale price of electricity. To the extent Dominion does not enter into long-term power purchase agreements or otherwise effectively hedge its output, these changes in market prices could adversely affect its financial results.

Dominion purchases fuel under a variety of terms, including long-term and short-term contracts and spot market purchases. Dominion is exposed to fuel cost volatility for the portion of its fuel obtained through short-term contracts or on the spot market, including as a result of market supply shortages. Fuel prices can be volatile and the price that can be obtained for power produced from such fuel may not change at the same rate as fuel costs, thus adversely impacting Dominion’s financial results.

Energy conservation could negatively impact Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s financial results. Certain regulatory and legislative bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by a fixed date. Additionally, technological advances driven by federal laws mandating new levels of energy efficiency in end-use electric devices, including lighting and electric heat pumps, could lead to declines in per capita energy consumption. To the extent conservation results in reduced energy demand or significantly slowed growth in demand, the value of the Companies’ business activities could be adversely impacted.

Exposure to counterparty performance may adversely affect the Companies’ financial results of operations. Dominion and Virginia Power are exposed to credit risks of their counterparties and the risk that one or more counterparties may fail or delay the performance of their contractual obligations, including but not limited to payment for services. Counterparties could fail or delay the performance of their contractual obligations for a number of reasons, including the effect of regulations on their operations. Such defaults by customers, suppliers or other third parties may adversely affect the Companies’ financial results.

 

 

22        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Market performance and other changes may decrease the value of decommissioning trust funds and benefit plan assets or increase Dominion’s liabilities, which could then require significant additional funding. The performance of the capital markets affects the value of the assets that are held in trusts to satisfy future obligations to decommission Dominion’s nuclear plants and under its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Dominion has significant obligations in these areas and holds significant assets in these trusts. These assets are subject to market fluctuation and will yield uncertain returns, which may fall below expected return rates.

With respect to decommissioning trust funds, a decline in the market value of these assets may increase the funding requirements of the obligations to decommission Dominion’s nuclear plants or require additional NRC-approved funding assurance.

A decline in the market value of the assets held in trusts to satisfy future obligations under Dominion’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans may increase the funding requirements under such plans. Additionally, changes in interest rates affect the liabilities under Dominion’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans; as interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, potentially requiring additional funding. Further, changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirements or changes in life expectancy assumptions, may also increase the funding requirements of the obligations related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans.

If the decommissioning trust funds and benefit plan assets are negatively impacted by market fluctuations or other factors, Dominion’s results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows could be negatively affected.

The use of derivative instruments could result in financial losses and liquidity constraints. Dominion and Virginia Power use derivative instruments, including futures, swaps, forwards, options and FTRs, to manage commodity and financial market risks. In addition, Dominion purchases and sells commodity-based contracts primarily in the natural gas market for trading purposes. The Companies could recognize financial losses on these contracts, including as a result of volatility in the market values of the underlying commodities, if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract or upon the failure or insolvency of a financial intermediary, exchange or clearinghouse used to enter, execute or clear these transactions. In the absence of actively-quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these contracts involves management’s judgment or use of estimates. As a result, changes in the under-lying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.

The use of derivatives to hedge future sales may limit the benefit Dominion would otherwise receive from increases in commodity prices. These hedge arrangements generally include collateral requirements that require Dominion to deposit funds or post letters of credit with counterparties, financial intermediaries or clearinghouses to cover the fair value of covered contracts in excess of agreed upon credit limits. For instance, when commodity prices rise to levels substantially higher than the levels where it has hedged future sales, Dominion may be required to use a material portion of its available liquidity or obtain additional liquidity to cover these collateral requirements. In some circumstances, this could have a compounding effect on Dominion’s financial liquidity and results of operations. In addition, the availability or security of the collateral delivered by Dominion

may be adversely affected by the failure or insolvency of a financial intermediary, exchange or clearinghouse used to enter, execute or clear these types of transactions.

Derivatives designated under hedge accounting, to the extent not fully offset by the hedged transaction, can result in ineffectiveness losses. These losses primarily result from differences between the location and/or specifications of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged item and could adversely affect Dominion’s results of operations.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations in regards to these transactions are subject to multiple market risks including market liquidity, price volatility, credit strength of the Companies’ counterparties and the financial condition of the financial intermediaries, exchanges and clearinghouses used for the types of transactions. These market risks are beyond the Companies’ control and could adversely affect their results of operations, liquidity and future growth.

The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted into law in July 2010 in an effort to improve regulation of financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions that will require certain over-the-counter derivatives, or swaps, to be centrally cleared and executed through an exchange or other approved trading platform. Non-financial entities that use swaps to hedge or mitigate commercial risk, often referred to as end users, can choose to exempt their hedging transactions from these clearing and exchange trading requirements. Final rules for the over-the-counter derivative-related provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will continue to be established through the ongoing rulemaking process of the applicable regulators. If, as a result of the rulemaking process, Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s derivative activities are not exempted from the clearing, exchange trading or margin requirements, the Companies could be subject to higher costs, including from higher margin requirements, for their derivative activities. In addition, implementation of, and compliance with, the over-the-counter derivative provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act by the Companies’ swap counterparties could result in increased costs related to the Companies’ derivative activities.

Changing rating agency requirements could negatively affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s growth and business strategy. In order to maintain appropriate credit ratings to obtain needed credit at a reasonable cost in light of existing or future rating agency requirements, Dominion and Virginia Power may find it necessary to take steps or change their business plans in ways that may adversely affect their growth and earnings. A reduction in Dominion’s credit ratings or the credit ratings of Virginia Power could result in an increase in borrowing costs, loss of access to certain markets, or both, thus adversely affecting operating results and could require Dominion to post additional collateral in connection with some of its price risk management activities.

An inability to access financial markets could adversely affect the execution of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business plans. Dominion and Virginia Power rely on access to short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as significant sources of funding and liquidity for capital expenditures, normal working capital and collateral requirements related to hedges of future sales and purchases of energy-related commodities. Deterioration in the Companies’ creditworthiness, as evaluated by credit rating agencies or otherwise, or declines in market reputation either for the Companies or their industry in general, or general financial market disruptions outside of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s control could increase their cost of borrowing or restrict their

 

 

23

 


Table of Contents

 

 

ability to access one or more financial markets. Further market disruptions could stem from delays in the current economic recovery, the bankruptcy of an unrelated company, general market disruption due to general credit market or political events, or the failure of financial institutions on which the Companies rely. Increased costs and restrictions on the Companies’ ability to access financial markets may be severe enough to affect their ability to execute their business plans as scheduled.

Potential changes in accounting practices may adversely affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s financial results. Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the impact that future changes in accounting standards or practices may have on public companies in general, the energy industry or their operations specifically. New accounting standards could be issued that could change the way they record revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. These changes in accounting standards could adversely affect earnings or could increase liabilities.

War, acts and threats of terrorism, natural disaster and other significant events could adversely affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations. Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the impact that any future terrorist attacks may have on the energy industry in general, or on the Companies’ business in particular. Any retaliatory military strikes or sustained military campaign may affect the Companies’ operations in unpredictable ways, such as changes in insurance markets and disruptions of fuel supplies and markets. In addition, the Companies’ infrastructure facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror. Furthermore, the physical compromise of the Companies’ facilities could adversely affect the Companies’ ability to manage these facilities effectively. Instability in financial markets as a result of terrorism, war, natural disasters, pandemic, credit crises, recession or other factors could result in a significant decline in the U.S. economy and increase the cost of insurance coverage. This could negatively impact the Companies’ results of operations and financial condition.

Hostile cyber intrusions could severely impair Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations, lead to the disclosure of confidential information, damage the reputation of the Companies and otherwise have an adverse effect on Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business. The Companies own assets deemed as critical infrastructure, the operation of which is dependent on information technology systems. Further, the computer systems that run the Companies’ facilities are not completely isolated from external networks. Parties that wish to disrupt the U.S. bulk power system or the Companies’ operations could view the Companies’ computer systems, software or networks as attractive targets for cyber attack. In addition, the Companies’ businesses require that they collect and maintain sensitive customer data, as well as confidential employee and shareholder information, which is subject to electronic theft or loss.

A successful cyber attack on the systems that control the Companies’ electric generation, electric or gas transmission or distribution assets could severely disrupt business operations, preventing the Companies from serving customers or collecting revenues. The breach of certain business systems could affect the Companies’ ability to correctly record, process and report financial information. A major cyber incident could result in significant expenses to investigate and repair security breaches or system damage and could lead to litigation, fines, other remedial action, heightened regulatory scrutiny and damage to the Companies’ reputation. In addition, the misappropriation, corruption or loss of personally identifiable information and other

confidential data could lead to significant breach notification expenses and mitigation expenses such as credit monitoring. The Companies maintain property and casualty insurance that may cover certain damage caused by potential cybersecurity incidents, however, other damage and claims arising from such incidents may not be covered or may exceed the amount of any insurance available. For these reasons, a significant cyber incident could materially and adversely affect the Companies’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to retain and attract key executive officers and other skilled professional and technical employees could have an adverse effect on Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business strategy is dependent on their ability to recruit, retain and motivate employees. Competition for skilled employees in some areas is high and the inability to retain and attract these employees could adversely affect their business and future operating results. An aging workforce in the energy industry necessitates recruiting, retaining and developing the next generation of leadership.

 

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

 

Item 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2012, Dominion owned its principal executive office and three other corporate offices, all located in Richmond, Virginia. Dominion also leases corporate offices in other cities in which its subsidiaries operate. Virginia Power shares its principal office in Richmond, Virginia, which is owned by Dominion. In addition, Virginia Power’s DVP and Generation segments share certain leased buildings and equipment. See Item 1. Business for additional information about each segment’s principal properties, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Dominion’s assets consist primarily of its investments in its subsidiaries, the principal properties of which are described here and in Item 1. Business.

Substantially all of Virginia Power’s property is subject to the lien of the Indenture of Mortgage securing its First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds. There were no bonds outstanding as of December 31, 2012; however, by leaving the indenture open, Virginia Power retains the flexibility to issue mortgage bonds in the future. Certain of Dominion’s merchant generation facilities are also subject to liens. See Item 7. MD&A for more information.

 

 

POWER GENERATION

Dominion and Virginia Power generate electricity for sale on a wholesale and a retail level. The Companies supply electricity demand either from their generation facilities or through purchased power contracts. As of December 31, 2012, Dominion Generation’s total utility and merchant generating capacity was approximately 27,500 MW.

 

 

24        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

The following tables list Dominion Generation’s utility and merchant generating units and capability, as of December 31, 2012:

VIRGINIA POWER UTILITY GENERATION

 

Plant    Location   

Net Summer

Capability (MW)

   

Percentage

Net Summer

Capability

 

Coal

       

Mt. Storm

   Mt. Storm, WV      1,599     

Chesterfield

   Chester, VA      1,267     

Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center

   Wise County, VA      600     

Chesapeake(1)

   Chesapeake, VA      595     

Clover

   Clover, VA      433 (5)   

Yorktown(1)

   Yorktown, VA      323     

Bremo(2)

   Bremo Bluff, VA      227     

Mecklenburg

   Clarksville, VA      138     

Altavista(3),(4)

   Altavista, VA      63     

Hopewell(4)

   Hopewell, VA      63     

Southampton(4)

   Southampton, VA      63           

Total Coal

        5,371        28

Gas

       

Ladysmith (CT)

   Ladysmith, VA      783     

Remington (CT)

   Remington, VA      608     

Bear Garden (CC)

   Buckingham County, VA      590     

Possum Point (CC)

   Dumfries, VA      559     

Chesterfield (CC)

   Chester, VA      397     

Elizabeth River (CT)

   Chesapeake, VA      348     

Possum Point

   Dumfries, VA      316     

Bellemeade (CC)

   Richmond, VA      267     

Gordonsville Energy (CC)

   Gordonsville, VA      218     

Gravel Neck (CT)

   Surry, VA      170     

Darbytown (CT)

   Richmond, VA      168     

Rosemary (CC)

   Roanoke Rapids, NC      165           

Total Gas

        4,589        23   

Nuclear

       

Surry

   Surry, VA      1,678     

North Anna

   Mineral, VA      1,668 (6)         

Total Nuclear

        3,346        17   

Oil

       

Yorktown

   Yorktown, VA      818     

Possum Point

   Dumfries, VA      786     

Gravel Neck (CT)

   Surry, VA      198     

Darbytown (CT)

   Richmond, VA      168     

Possum Point (CT)

   Dumfries, VA      72     

Chesapeake (CT)

   Chesapeake, VA      51     

Low Moor (CT)

   Covington, VA      48     

Northern Neck (CT)

   Lively, VA      47           

Total Oil

        2,188        11   

Hydro

       

Bath County

   Warm Springs, VA      1,802 (7)   

Gaston

   Roanoke Rapids, NC      220     

Roanoke Rapids

   Roanoke Rapids, NC      95     

Other

   Various      3           

Total Hydro

        2,120        11   

Biomass

       

Pittsylvania

   Hurt, VA      83          

Various

       

Other

   Various      11          
            17,708           

Power Purchase Agreements

          1,887        10   

Total Utility Generation

          19,595        100

Note: (CT) denotes combustion turbine and (CC) denotes combined cycle.

(1) Certain coal-fired units are expected to be retired at Chesapeake and Yorktown by 2015 as a result of the issuance of the MATS rule.
(2) Planned to convert to gas subject to necessary regulatory approvals.
(3) Facility has been placed into cold reserve status, but can be restarted within a reasonably short period if necessary.
(4) In the first quarter of 2012, the facility received regulatory approval to convert to biomass.

 

        25

 


Table of Contents

 

 

(5) Excludes 50% undivided interest owned by ODEC.
(6) Excludes 11.6% undivided interest owned by ODEC.
(7) Excludes 40% undivided interest owned by Allegheny Generating Company, a subsidiary of Allegheny Energy, Inc.

DOMINION MERCHANT GENERATION

 

Plant    Location   

Net Summer

Capability (MW)

   

Percentage

Net Summer

Capability

 

Nuclear

       

Millstone

   Waterford, CT      2,016 (5)   

Kewaunee(1)

   Kewaunee, WI      556           

Total Nuclear

        2,572        33

Gas

       

Fairless (CC)(2),(3)

   Fairless Hills, PA      1,196     

Elwood (CT)(2),(4)

   Elwood, IL      712 (6)   

Manchester (CC)

   Providence, RI      432           

Total Gas

        2,340        30   

Coal

       

Kincaid(2),(4)

   Kincaid, IL      1,158     

Brayton Point(4)

   Somerset, MA      1,083           

Total Coal

        2,241        28   

Oil

       

Brayton Point(4)

   Somerset, MA      435           

Total Oil

        435        6   

Wind

       

Fowler Ridge(2)

   Benton County, IN      150 (7)   

NedPower Mt. Storm(2)

   Grant County, WV      132 (8)         

Total Wind

        282        3   

Various

       

Brayton Point(4),(9)

   Somerset, MA      10          
       

Total Merchant Generation

          7,880        100

Note: (CT) denotes combustion turbine and (CC) denotes combined cycle.

(1) In the fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced that it would permanently cease operations at Kewaunee in 2013 and commence decommissioning of this facility.
(2) Subject to a lien securing the facility’s debt. Also see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on liens related to Kincaid and Fairless.
(3) Includes generating units that Dominion operates under leasing arrangements.
(4) In the third quarter of 2012, Dominion announced its decision to pursue the sale of Brayton Point, Kincaid and its 50% interest in Elwood.
(5) Excludes 6.53% undivided interest in Unit 3 owned by Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and Green Mountain Power Corporation.
(6) Excludes 50% membership interest owned by J-POWER Elwood, LLC.
(7) Excludes 50% membership interest owned by BP.
(8) Excludes 50% membership interest owned by Shell.
(9) Represents four diesel generators.

 

26        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, Dominion and Virginia Power are alleged to be in violation or in default under orders, statutes, rules or regulations relating to the environment, compliance plans imposed upon or agreed to by the Companies, or permits issued by various local, state and/or federal agencies for the construction or operation of facilities. Administrative proceedings may also be pending on these matters. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, the Companies and their subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings.

In February 2008, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at State Line and Kincaid. In April 2009, Dominion received a second request for information. Dominion provided information in response to both requests. Also in April 2009, Dominion received a Notice and Finding of Violations from the EPA claiming violations of the CAA New Source Review requirements, NSPS, and Title V permit program and the stations’ respective State Implementation Plans. The Notice states that the EPA may issue an order requiring compliance with the relevant CAA provisions and may seek injunctive relief and/or civil penalties, all pursuant to the EPA’s enforcement authority under the CAA. In May 2010, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at Brayton Point. Dominion submitted its response to the request in November 2010.

Dominion believes that it complied with applicable laws and the EPA regulations and interpretations in effect at the time the work in question took place. The CAA authorizes maximum civil penalties of $25,000 to $37,500 per day, per violation at each generating unit, depending on the date of the alleged violation. In addition to any such penalties that may be awarded, an adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures or affect the timing of currently budgeted capital expenditures. Dominion is currently in settlement discussions to resolve these matters. However, there can be no assurance that Dominion will reach a settlement with the EPA. Dominion does not believe that final resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

See Notes 13 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Future Issues and Other Matters in MD&A, which information is incorporated herein by reference, for discussion of various environmental and other regulatory proceedings to which the Companies are a party.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 

 

27

 


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of Dominion

 

 

Information concerning the executive officers of Dominion, each of whom is elected annually, is as follows:

 

Name and Age    Business Experience Past Five Years(1)

Thomas F. Farrell II (58)

   Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dominion from April 2007 to date; President and CEO of Dominion from January 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of Virginia Power from February 2006 to date.

Mark F. McGettrick (55)

   Executive Vice President and CFO of Dominion and Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from April 2006 to May 2009; President and COO-Generation of Virginia Power from February 2006 to May 2009.

Paul D. Koonce (53)

   Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer – Energy Infrastructure Group of Dominion from February 2013 to date; President and COO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from April 2006 to February 2013.

David A. Christian (58)

   Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer – Dominion Generation Group of Dominion from February 2013 to date; President and COO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from May 2011 to February 2013; President and CNO of Virginia Power from October 2007 to May 2009.

David A. Heacock (55)

   President and CNO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Senior Vice President of Dominion and President and COO-DVP of Virginia Power from June 2008 to May 2009; Senior Vice President-DVP of Virginia Power from October 2007 to May 2008.

Gary L. Sypolt (59)

   Executive Vice President of Dominion from May 2011 to date; President of DTI from June 2009 to date; President-Transmission of DTI from January 2003 to May 2009.

Robert M. Blue (45)

   Senior Vice President-Law, Public Policy and Environment of Dominion and Virginia Power from January 2011 to date; Senior Vice President-Public Policy and Environment of Dominion from February 2010 to December 2010; Senior Vice President-Public Policy and Corporate Communications of Dominion from May 2008 to January 2010; Vice President-State and Federal Affairs of DRS from September 2006 to May 2008.

Steven A. Rogers (51)(2)

   Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Dominion from October 2007 to December 2012; Senior Vice President and CAO of Dominion and Virginia Power from January 2007 to September 2007 and CNG from January 2007 to June 2007.

Ashwini Sawhney (63)

   Vice President-Accounting and Controller (CAO) of Dominion from May 2010 to date; Vice President and Controller (CAO) of Dominion from July 2009 to May 2010; Vice President-Accounting of Virginia Power from April 2006 to date; Vice President and Controller of Dominion from April 2007 to June 2009.

 

(1) Any service listed for Virginia Power, DTI and DRS reflects service at a subsidiary of Dominion.
(2) Steven A. Rogers ceased to be an executive officer of Dominion as of January 1, 2013.

 

28        

 


Table of Contents

Part II

 

 

 

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Dominion

Dominion’s common stock is listed on the NYSE. At January 31, 2013, there were approximately 139,000 record holders of Dominion’s common stock. The number of record holders is comprised of individual shareholder accounts maintained on Dominion’s transfer agent records and includes accounts with shares held in (1) certificate form, (2) book-entry in the Direct Registration System and (3) book-entry under Dominion Direct. Discussions of expected dividend payments and restrictions on Dominion’s payment of dividends required by this Item are contained in Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7. MD&A and Notes 17 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Cash dividends were paid quarterly in 2012 and 2011. Quarterly information concerning stock prices and dividends is disclosed in Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table presents certain information with respect to Dominion’s common stock repurchases during the fourth quarter of 2012:

 

 

DOMINION PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Period   

Total

Number

of Shares

(or Units)

Purchased(1)

     Average
Price
Paid per
Share
(or Unit)(2)
    

Total Number

of Shares (or Units)

Purchased as Part

of Publicly Announced

Plans or Programs

    

Maximum Number (or

Approximate Dollar Value)

of Shares (or Units) that May

Yet Be Purchased under the

Plans or Programs(3)

 

10/1/2012-10/31/12

     467       $ 52.81         N/A       19,629,059 shares/$ 1.18 billion   

11/1/2012-11/30/12

           $         N/A       19,629,059 shares/$ 1.18 billion   

12/1/2012-12/31/12

           $         N/A       19,629,059 shares/$ 1.18 billion   

Total

     467       $ 52.81         N/A       19,629,059 shares/$ 1.18 billion   

 

(1) In October 2012, 467 shares were tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock.
(2) Represents the weighted-average price paid per share.
(3) The remaining repurchase authorization is pursuant to repurchase authority granted by the Dominion Board of Directors in February 2005, as modified in June 2007. The aggregate authorization granted by the Dominion Board of Directors was 86 million shares (as adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split distributed in November 2007) not to exceed $4 billion.

Virginia Power

There is no established public trading market for Virginia Power’s common stock, all of which is owned by Dominion. Restrictions on Virginia Power’s payment of dividends are discussed in Dividend Restrictions in Item 7. MD&A and Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Virginia Power paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock as follows:

 

      First
Quarter
     Second
Quarter
     Third
Quarter
     Fourth
Quarter
     Full
Year
 
(millions)                                   

2012

   $ 149       $ 120       $ 110       $ 180       $ 559   

2011

     131         118         199         109         557   

 

        29

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

DOMINION

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012     2011     2010     2009      2008  
(millions, except per share amounts)                                

Operating revenue

   $ 13,093      $ 14,145      $ 14,927      $ 14,575       $ 15,594   

Income from continuing operations, net of tax(1)

     324        1,433        3,066        1,276         1,599   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)

     (22     (25     (258     11         235   

Net income attributable to Dominion

     302        1,408        2,808        1,287         1,834   

Income from continuing operations before loss from discontinued operations per common share-basic

     0.57        2.50        5.21        2.15         2.76   

Net income attributable to Dominion per common share-basic

     0.53        2.46        4.77        2.17         3.17   

Income from continuing operations before loss from discontinued operations per common share-diluted

     0.57        2.49        5.20        2.15         2.75   

Net income attributable to Dominion per common share-diluted

     0.53        2.45        4.76        2.17         3.16   

Dividends declared per common share

     2.11        1.97        1.83        1.75         1.58   

Total assets

     46,838        45,614        42,817        42,554         42,053   

Long-term debt

     16,851        17,394        15,758        15,481         14,956   

 

(1) Amounts attributable to Dominion’s common shareholders.

2012 results include a $1.0 billion after-tax impairment charge due to bids received for Brayton Point and Kincaid and a $303 million after-tax charge primarily resulting from management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013.

2011 results include a $139 million after-tax charge reflecting generation plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain utility coal-fired generating units and a $59 million after-tax charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

2010 results include a $1.4 billion after-tax net income benefit from the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations, net of charges related to the divestiture and a $202 million after-tax charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, as discussed in Notes 3 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively. The loss from discontinued operations in 2010 includes $127 million of after-tax impairment charges at certain merchant generation facilities and a $140 million after-tax loss on the sale of Peoples.

2009 results include a $435 million after-tax charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings. Also in 2009, Dominion recorded a $281 million after-tax ceiling test impairment charge related to the carrying value of its Appalachian E&P properties.

2008 results include $109 million of after-tax charges reflecting other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of certain securities held as investments in nuclear decommissioning trusts. In addition, income from discontinued operations in 2008 includes a $120 million after-tax benefit due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities associated with the sale of Peoples.

VIRGINIA POWER

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      2011      2010      2009      2008  
(millions)                                   

Operating revenue

   $ 7,226       $ 7,246       $ 7,219       $ 6,584       $ 6,934   

Net income

     1,050         822         852         356         864   

Balance available for common stock

     1,034         805         835         339         847   

Total assets

     24,811         23,544         22,262         20,118         18,802   

Long-term debt

     6,251         6,246         6,702         6,213         6,000   

2012 results include a $53 million after-tax charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms.

2011 results include a $139 million after-tax charge reflecting generation plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain coal-fired generating units and a $59 million after-tax charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

2010 results include a $123 million after-tax charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2009 results include a $427 million after-tax charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings.

 

30        

 


Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

 

MD&A discusses Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s results of operations and general financial condition. MD&A should be read in conjunction with Item 1. Business and the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

 

CONTENTS OF MD&A

MD&A consists of the following information:

Ÿ  

Forward-Looking Statements

Ÿ  

Accounting Matters

Ÿ  

Dominion

  Ÿ  

Results of Operations

  Ÿ  

Segment Results of Operations

Ÿ  

Virginia Power

  Ÿ  

Results of Operations

  Ÿ  

Segment Results of Operations

Ÿ  

Selected Information—Energy Trading Activities

Ÿ  

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Ÿ  

Future Issues and Other Matters

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains statements concerning Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s expectations, plans, objectives, future financial performance and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In most cases, the reader can identify these forward-looking statements by such words as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “expect,” “believe,” “should,” “could,” “plan,” “may,” “continue,” “target” or other similar words.

Dominion and Virginia Power make forward-looking statements with full knowledge that risks and uncertainties exist that may cause actual results to differ materially from predicted results. Factors that may cause actual results to differ are often presented with the forward-looking statements themselves. Additionally, other factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement. These factors include but are not limited to:

Ÿ  

Unusual weather conditions and their effect on energy sales to customers and energy commodity prices;

Ÿ  

Extreme weather events and other natural disasters, including hurricanes, high winds, severe storms, earthquakes and changes in water temperature and availability that can cause outages and property damage to facilities;

Ÿ  

Federal, state and local legislative and regulatory developments;

Ÿ  

Changes to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those related to climate change, the tightening of emission or discharge limits for GHGs and other emissions, more extensive permitting requirements and the regulation of additional substances;

Ÿ  

Cost of environmental compliance, including those costs related to climate change;

Ÿ  

Risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities, including costs associated with the disposal of spent nuclear fuel, decommissioning, plant maintenance and changes in existing regulations governing such facilities;

Ÿ  

Unplanned outages of the Companies’ facilities;

Ÿ  

Fluctuations in energy-related commodity prices and the effect these could have on Dominion’s earnings and Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s liquidity position and the underlying value of their assets;

Ÿ  

Counterparty credit and performance risk;

Ÿ  

Capital market conditions, including the availability of credit and the ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms;

Ÿ  

Risks associated with Virginia Power’s membership and participation in PJM, including risks related to obligations created by the default of other participants;

Ÿ  

Price risk due to investments held in nuclear decommissioning trusts by Dominion and Virginia Power and in benefit plan trusts by Dominion;

Ÿ  

Fluctuations in interest rates;

Ÿ  

Changes in federal and state tax laws and regulations;

Ÿ  

Changes in rating agency requirements or credit ratings and their effect on availability and cost of capital;

Ÿ  

Changes in financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by governing bodies;

Ÿ  

Employee workforce factors including collective bargaining agreements and labor negotiations with union employees;

Ÿ  

Risks of operating businesses in regulated industries that are subject to changing regulatory structures;

Ÿ  

Impacts of acquisitions, divestitures and retirements of assets based on asset portfolio reviews;

Ÿ  

Receipt of approvals for, and timing of, closing dates for acquisitions and divestitures;

Ÿ  

Changes in rules for RTOs and ISOs in which Dominion and Virginia Power participate, including changes in rate designs and new and evolving capacity models;

Ÿ  

Political and economic conditions, including inflation and deflation;

Ÿ  

Domestic terrorism and other threats to the Companies’ physical and intangible assets, as well as threats to cybersecurity;

Ÿ  

Changes in demand for the Companies’ services, including industrial, commercial and residential growth or decline in the Companies’ service areas, changes in customer growth or usage patterns, including as a result of energy conservation programs, and changes in demand for Dominion’s natural gas services;

Ÿ  

Additional competition in the electric industry, including in electric markets in which Dominion’s merchant generation facilities operate, and competition in the construction and ownership of electric transmission facilities in Virginia Power’s service territory, in connection with FERC Order 1000;

Ÿ  

Changes in technology, particularly with respect to new, developing or alternative sources of generation and smart grid technologies;

Ÿ  

Changes to regulated electric rates collected by Virginia Power and regulated gas distribution, transportation and storage rates, including LNG storage, collected by Dominion;

Ÿ  

Timing and receipt of regulatory approvals necessary for planned construction or expansion projects;

Ÿ  

The inability to complete planned construction projects within the terms and time frames initially anticipated; and

Ÿ  

Adverse outcomes in litigation matters or regulatory proceedings.

Additionally, other risks that could cause actual results to differ from predicted results are set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

 

        31

 


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

 

ACCOUNTING MATTERS

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Dominion and Virginia Power have identified the following accounting policies, including certain inherent estimates, that as a result of the judgments, uncertainties, uniqueness and complexities of the underlying accounting standards and operations involved, could result in material changes to their financial condition or results of operations under different conditions or using different assumptions. Dominion and Virginia Power have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of each of these policies with the Audit Committees of their Boards of Directors. Virginia Power’s Board of Directors also serves as its Audit Committee.

ACCOUNTING FOR REGULATED OPERATIONS

The accounting for Virginia Power’s regulated electric and Dominion’s regulated gas operations differs from the accounting for nonregulated operations in that they are required to reflect the effect of rate regulation in their Consolidated Financial Statements. For regulated businesses subject to federal or state cost-of-service rate regulation, regulatory practices that assign costs to accounting periods may differ from accounting methods generally applied by nonregulated companies. When it is probable that regulators will permit the recovery of current costs through future rates charged to customers, these costs are deferred as regulatory assets that otherwise would be expensed by nonregulated companies. Likewise, regulatory liabilities are recognized when it is probable that regulators will require customer refunds through future rates or when revenue is collected from customers for expenditures that have yet to be incurred. Generally, regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized into income over the period authorized by the regulator.

The Companies evaluate whether or not recovery of their regulatory assets through future rates is probable and make various assumptions in their analyses. The expectations of future recovery are generally based on orders issued by regulatory commissions or historical experience, as well as discussions with applicable regulatory authorities. If recovery of a regulatory asset is determined to be less than probable, it will be written off in the period such assessment is made. See Notes 12 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

Dominion and Virginia Power recognize liabilities for the expected cost of retiring tangible long-lived assets for which a legal obligation exists and the ARO can be reasonably estimated. These AROs are recognized at fair value as incurred and are capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived assets. In the absence of quoted market prices, the Companies estimate the fair value of their AROs using present value techniques, in which they make various assumptions including estimates of the amounts and timing of future cash flows associated with retirement activities, credit-adjusted risk free rates and cost escalation rates. The impact on measurements of new AROs or remeasurements of existing AROs, using different cost escalation rates in the future, may be significant. When the Companies revise any assumptions used to calculate the fair value of existing AROs, they adjust the carrying amount of both the ARO liability and the related long-lived asset. The Companies accrete the ARO liability to reflect the passage of time.

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, Dominion recognized $77 million, $84 million and $85 million, respectively, of accretion, and expects to recognize $88 million in 2013. In 2012, 2011 and 2010, Virginia Power recognized $34 million, $36 million and $35 million, respectively, of accretion, and expects to recognize $38 million in 2013. Virginia Power records accretion and depreciation associated with utility nuclear decommissioning AROs as an adjustment to its regulatory liability for nuclear decommissioning.

A significant portion of the Companies’ AROs relates to the future decommissioning of Dominion’s merchant and Virginia Power’s utility nuclear facilities. These nuclear decommissioning AROs are reported in the Dominion Generation segment. At December 31, 2012, Dominion’s nuclear decommissioning AROs totaled $1.5 billion, representing approximately 86% of its total AROs. At December 31, 2012, Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning AROs totaled $633 million, representing approximately 90% of its total AROs. Based on their significance, the following discussion of critical assumptions inherent in determining the fair value of AROs relates to those associated with the Companies’ nuclear decommissioning obligations.

The Companies obtain from third-party specialists periodic site-specific base year cost studies in order to estimate the nature, cost and timing of planned decommissioning activities for their nuclear plants. These cost studies are based on relevant information available at the time they are performed; however, estimates of future cash flows for extended periods of time are by nature highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results. In addition, the Companies’ cost estimates include cost escalation rates that are applied to the base year costs. The Companies determine cost escalation rates, which represent projected cost increases over time due to both general inflation and increases in the cost of specific decommissioning activities, for each nuclear facility. The selection of these cost escalation rates is dependent on subjective factors which are considered to be a critical assumption.

In September 2012, Dominion recorded an increase of $246 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. The ARO revision was primarily driven by management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013. Virginia Power recorded an increase of $43 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. The ARO revision was driven by an increase in estimated costs. In December 2011, Dominion recorded a decrease of $290 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. Virginia Power recorded a decrease of $95 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. The ARO revision in 2011 was driven by a reduction in anticipated future decommissioning costs due to the expected future recovery from the DOE of certain spent fuel costs based on the Companies’ contracts with the DOE for disposal of spent nuclear fuel, as well as updated escalation rates.

INCOME TAXES

Judgment and the use of estimates are required in developing the provision for income taxes and reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities. The interpretation of tax laws involves uncertainty, since tax authorities may interpret the laws differently. Ultimate resolution of income tax matters may result in favorable or unfavorable impacts to net income and cash flows, and adjustments to tax-related assets and liabilities could be material.

 

 

32        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Given the uncertainty and judgment involved in the determination and filing of income taxes, there are standards for recognition and measurement in financial statements of positions taken or expected to be taken by an entity in its income tax returns. Positions taken by an entity in its income tax returns that are recognized in the financial statements must satisfy a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, assuming that the position will be examined by tax authorities with full knowledge of all relevant information. At December 31, 2012, Dominion had $293 million and Virginia Power had $57 million of unrecognized tax benefits.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded representing future effects on income taxes for temporary differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Dominion and Virginia Power evaluate quarterly the probability of realizing deferred tax assets by considering current and historical financial results, expectations for future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies that can be implemented, if necessary, to realize deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income or successfully implement tax planning strategies may affect the realization of deferred tax assets. The Companies establish a valuation allowance when it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. At December 31, 2012, Dominion had established $93 million of valuation allowances and Virginia Power had no valuation allowances.

ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS AT FAIR VALUE

Dominion and Virginia Power use derivative contracts such as futures, swaps, forwards, options and FTRs to manage commodity and financial market risks of their business operations. Derivative contracts, with certain exceptions, are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Accounting requirements for derivatives and related hedging activities are complex and may be subject to further clarification by standard-setting bodies. The majority of investments held in Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning and Dominion’s rabbi and benefit plan trust funds are also subject to fair value accounting. See Notes 6 and 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on these fair value measurements.

Fair value is based on actively-quoted market prices, if available. In the absence of actively-quoted market prices, management seeks indicative price information from external sources, including broker quotes and industry publications. When evaluating pricing information provided by brokers and other pricing services, the Companies consider whether the broker is willing and able to trade at the quoted price, if the broker quotes are based on an active market or an inactive market and the extent to which brokers are utilizing a particular model if pricing is not readily available. If pricing information from external sources is not available, or if the Companies believe that observable pricing information is not indicative of fair value, judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value. In those cases, the Companies must estimate prices based on available historical and near-term future price information and use of statistical methods, including regression analysis, that reflect their market assumptions.

The Companies maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

USE OF ESTIMATES IN GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT TESTING

As of December 31, 2012, Dominion reported $3.1 billion of goodwill in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. A significant portion resulted from the acquisition of the former CNG in 2000.

In April of each year, Dominion tests its goodwill for potential impairment, and performs additional tests more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change in the interim that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The 2012, 2011 and 2010 annual tests and any interim tests did not result in the recognition of any goodwill impairment.

In general, Dominion estimates the fair value of its reporting units by using a combination of discounted cash flows and other valuation techniques that use multiples of earnings for peer group companies and analyses of recent business combinations involving peer group companies. For Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations and Peoples and Hope operations, negotiated sales prices were used as fair value for the tests conducted in 2010. Fair value estimates are dependent on subjective factors such as Dominion’s estimate of future cash flows, the selection of appropriate discount and growth rates, and the selection of peer group companies and recent transactions. These underlying assumptions and estimates are made as of a point in time; subsequent modifications, particularly changes in discount rates or growth rates inherent in Dominion’s estimates of future cash flows, could result in a future impairment of goodwill. Although Dominion has consistently applied the same methods in developing the assumptions and estimates that underlie the fair value calculations, such as estimates of future cash flows, and based those estimates on relevant information available at the time, such cash flow estimates are highly uncertain by nature and may vary significantly from actual results. If the estimates of future cash flows used in the most recent tests had been 10% lower, the resulting fair values would have still been greater than the carrying values of each of those reporting units tested, indicating that no impairment was present. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

USE OF ESTIMATES IN LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT TESTING

Impairment testing for an individual or group of long-lived assets or for intangible assets with definite lives is required when circumstances indicate those assets may be impaired. When an asset’s carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted estimated future cash flows associated with the asset, the asset is considered impaired to the extent that the asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. Performing an impairment test on long-lived assets involves judgment in areas such as identifying if circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, identifying and grouping affected assets, and developing the undiscounted and discounted estimated future cash flows (used to estimate fair value in the absence of market-based value) associated with the asset, including probability weighting such cash flows to reflect expectations about possible variations in their amounts or timing, expectations about operating the long-lived assets and the

 

 

33

 


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

selection of an appropriate discount rate. Although cash flow estimates are based on relevant information available at the time the estimates are made, estimates of future cash flows are, by nature, highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results. For example, estimates of future cash flows would contemplate factors which may change over time, such as the expected use of the asset, including future production and sales levels, expected fluctuations of prices of commodities sold and consumed and expected proceeds from dispositions. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of impairments related to certain long-lived assets.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Dominion sponsors noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for eligible active employees, retirees and qualifying dependents. The projected costs of providing benefits under these plans are dependent, in part, on historical information such as employee demographics, the level of contributions made to the plans and earnings on plan assets. Assumptions about the future, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, discount rates applied to benefit obligations and the anticipated rate of increase in healthcare costs and participant compensation, also have a significant impact on employee benefit costs. The impact of changes in these factors, as well as differences between Dominion’s assumptions and actual experience, is generally recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the remaining average service period of plan participants, rather than immediately.

The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates and healthcare cost trend rates are critical assumptions. Dominion determines the expected long-term rates of return on plan assets for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans by using a combination of:

Ÿ  

Expected inflation and risk-free interest rate assumptions;

Ÿ  

Historical return analysis to determine long term historic returns as well as historic risk premiums for various asset classes;

Ÿ  

Expected future risk premiums, asset volatilities and correlations;

Ÿ  

Forward-looking return expectations derived from the yield on long-term bonds and the expected long-term returns of major stock market indices; and

Ÿ  

Investment allocation of plan assets. The strategic target asset allocation for Dominion’s pension funds is 28% U.S. equity, 18% non-U.S. equity, 33% fixed income, 3% real estate and 18% other alternative investments, such as private equity investments.

Strategic investment policies are established for Dominion’s prefunded benefit plans based upon periodic asset/liability studies. Factors considered in setting the investment policy include those mentioned above such as employee demographics, liability growth rates, future discount rates, the funded status of the plans and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Deviations from the plans’ strategic allocation are a function of Dominion’s assessments regarding short-term risk and reward opportunities in the capital markets and/or short-term market movements which result in the plans’ actual asset allocations varying from the strategic target asset allocations. Through periodic rebalancing, actual allocations are brought back in line with the target. Future asset/

liability studies will focus on strategies to further reduce pension and other postretirement plan risk, while still achieving attractive levels of returns.

Dominion develops assumptions, which are then compared to the forecasts of an independent investment advisor to ensure reasonableness. An internal committee selects the final assumptions. Dominion calculated its pension cost using an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption of 8.50% for 2012, 2011 and 2010. Dominion calculated its other postretirement benefit cost using an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption of 7.75% for 2012, 2011 and 2010. The rate used in calculating other postretirement benefit cost is lower than the rate used in calculating pension cost because of differences in the relative amounts of various types of investments held as plan assets.

Dominion determines discount rates from analyses of AA/Aa rated bonds with cash flows matching the expected payments to be made under its plans. The discount rates used to calculate pension cost and other postretirement benefit cost were 5.50% in 2012, 5.90% in 2011 and 6.60% in 2010. Dominion selected a discount rate of 4.40% for determining its December 31, 2012 projected pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.

Dominion establishes the healthcare cost trend rate assumption based on analyses of various factors including the specific provisions of its medical plans, actual cost trends experienced and projected, and demographics of plan participants. Dominion’s healthcare cost trend rate assumption as of December 31, 2012 was 7% and is expected to gradually decrease to 4.60% by 2061 and continue at that rate for years thereafter.

The following table illustrates the effect on cost of changing the critical actuarial assumptions previously discussed, while holding all other assumptions constant:

 

             Increase in Net Periodic Cost  
      Change in
Actuarial
Assumption
    Pension
Benefits
     Other
Postretirement
Benefits
 
(millions, except percentages)                    

Discount rate

     (0.25 )%    $ 17       $ 4   

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

     (0.25 )%      13         3   

Healthcare cost trend rate

     1     N/A         17   

In addition to the effects on cost, at December 31, 2012, a 0.25% decrease in the discount rate would increase Dominion’s projected pension benefit obligation by $219 million and its accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by $54 million, while a 1.00% increase in the healthcare cost trend rate would increase its accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by $218 million. See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

REVENUE RECOGNITION—UNBILLED REVENUE

Virginia Power recognizes and records revenues when energy is delivered to the customer. The determination of sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each month, the amount of electric energy delivered to customers, but not yet billed, is estimated and recorded as unbilled revenue. This estimate is reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on meter readings. Virginia

 

 

34        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Power’s customer receivables included $348 million and $360 million of accrued unbilled revenue at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The calculation of unbilled revenues is complex and includes numerous estimates and assumptions including historical usage, applicable customer rates, weather factors and total daily electric generation supplied, adjusted for line losses. Changes in customer usage patterns and other factors, which are the basis for the estimates of unbilled revenues, could have a significant effect on the calculation and therefore on Virginia Power’s results of operations and financial condition.

DOMINION

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of Dominion’s consolidated results:

 

Year Ended
December 31,
   2012      $ Change     2011      $ Change     2010  
(millions, except EPS)                                 

Net Income attributable to Dominion

   $ 302       $ (1,106   $ 1,408       $ (1,400   $ 2,808   

Diluted EPS

     0.53         (1.92     2.45         (2.31     4.76   

Overview

2012 VS. 2011

Net income attributable to Dominion decreased by 79%. Unfavorable drivers include impairment and other charges related to bids received for Brayton Point and Kincaid and management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013. Favorable drivers include the absence of an impairment charge related to certain utility coal-fired power stations and the absence of restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene recorded in 2011.

2011 VS. 2010

Net income attributable to Dominion decreased by 50%. Unfavorable drivers include the absence of a gain on the sale of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations, lower margins from merchant generation operations, and the impact of less favorable weather, including Hurricane Irene, on electric utility operations. Favorable drivers include the absence of charges related to a workforce reduction program and the absence of a loss on the sale of Peoples, and higher earnings from rate adjustment clauses.

Analysis of Consolidated Operations

Presented below are selected amounts related to Dominion’s results of operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,   2012     $ Change     2011     $ Change     2010  
(millions)                              

Operating Revenue

  $ 13,093      $ (1,052   $ 14,145      $ (782   $ 14,927   

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

    3,748        (349     4,097        63        4,034   

Purchased electric capacity

    387        (67     454        1        453   

Purchased gas

    1,177        (587     1,764        (285     2,049   

Net Revenue

    7,781        (49     7,830        (561     8,391   

Other operations and maintenance

    4,868        1,546        3,322        (126     3,448   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    1,186        120        1,066        31        1,035   

Other taxes

    571        23        548        24        524   

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations

                         (2,467     2,467   

Other income

    223        45        178        8        170   

Interest and related charges

    882        15        867        41        826   

Income tax expense

    146        (608     754        (1,358     2,112   

Loss from discontinued operations

    (22     3        (25     233        (258

An analysis of Dominion’s results of operations follows:

2012 VS. 2011

Net Revenue decreased 1%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

A $161 million decrease from merchant generation operations, primarily reflecting a decrease in realized prices; and

Ÿ  

A $144 million decrease from regulated natural gas distribution operations primarily reflecting decreased rider revenue ($117 million) related to low income assistance programs.

These decreases were partially offset by:

Ÿ  

A $184 million increase from electric utility operations, primarily reflecting:

  Ÿ  

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($138 million);

  Ÿ  

The absence of a charge recorded in 2011 based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million); and

  Ÿ  

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($31 million); partially offset by

  Ÿ  

The impact ($58 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in cooling and heating degree days ($184 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($126 million);

Ÿ  

A $57 million increase in retail energy marketing activities primarily due to price risk management activities; and

Ÿ  

A $6 million increase from regulated natural gas transmission operations, primarily due to new transportation assets placed in service.

 

 

35

 


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

Other operations and maintenance increased 47%, primarily reflecting:

 

Ÿ  

A $1.6 billion impairment charge due to bids received for Brayton Point and Kincaid;

Ÿ  

A $415 million impairment charge due to management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013; and

Ÿ  

A $107 million increase in salaries, wages and benefits.

These increases were partially offset by:

Ÿ  

The absence of an impairment charge recorded in 2011 related to certain utility coal-fired generating units ($228 million);

Ÿ  

A $117 million decrease in bad debt expense at regulated natural gas distribution operations primarily related to low income assistance programs. These expenses are recovered through rates and do not impact net income; and

Ÿ  

The absence of restoration costs recorded in 2011 associated with damages caused by Hurricane Irene ($96 million).

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased 11%, primarily due to property additions.

Other Income increased 25%, primarily due to higher realized gains (including investment income) on nuclear decommissioning trust funds.

Income tax expense decreased 81%, primarily reflecting lower pre-tax income in 2012.

2011 VS. 2010

Net Revenue decreased 7%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

A $504 million decrease from merchant generation operations, primarily due to a decrease in realized prices ($340 million) and lower generation ($153 million); and

Ÿ  

A $125 million decrease reflecting the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations in April 2010.

These decreases were partially offset by:

Ÿ  

A $32 million increase from Dominion’s gas transmission business primarily related to an increase in revenue from NGLs;

Ÿ  

A $28 million increase in producer services primarily related to higher physical margins and favorable price changes on economic hedging positions, all associated with natural gas aggregation, marketing and trading activities;

Ÿ  

A $13 million increase from electric utility operations, primarily reflecting:

  Ÿ  

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($169 million); and

  Ÿ  

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($44 million); partially offset by

  Ÿ  

The impact ($120 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in heating and cooling degree days ($220 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($100 million); and

  Ÿ  

A decrease due to a charge based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million).

Other operations and maintenance decreased 4% primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

A $434 million decrease in salaries, wages and benefits primarily related to a 2010 workforce reduction program; partially offset by

Ÿ  

A $228 million impairment charge related to certain utility coal-fired generating units; and

Ÿ  

A $96 million increase due to restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations reflects a gain on the sale of these operations, as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest and related charges increased 5%, primarily due to the absence of a benefit recorded in 2010 resulting from the discontinuance of hedge accounting for certain interest rate derivatives ($73 million) and an increase in debt issuances in 2011 ($18 million), partially offset by the recognition of hedging gains that had previously been deferred as regulatory liabilities as a result of the Biennial Review Order ($50 million).

Income tax expense decreased 64%, primarily reflecting lower federal and state taxes largely due to the absence of a gain from the sale of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations recorded in 2010.

Loss from discontinued operations reflects the sale of Peoples in 2010, as well as losses associated with State Line and Salem Harbor, which were reclassified to discontinued operations as a result of their sale in 2012.

Outlook

Dominion’s strategy is to continue focusing on its regulated businesses while maintaining upside potential in well-positioned nonregulated businesses. The goals of this strategy are to provide earnings per share growth, a growing dividend and to maintain a stable credit profile. Dominion is in the process of transitioning to a more regulated earnings mix, and is targeting 80-90 percent of its earnings to come from regulated businesses in 2013 and beyond. This is evidenced by Dominion’s capital investments in regulated infrastructure, as well as its disposition of certain merchant generation facilities during 2012 and its announcement that certain other merchant generation facilities are expected to be sold or decommissioned in 2013.

In 2013, Dominion is expected to experience an increase in net income on a per share basis as compared to 2012. Dominion’s anticipated 2013 results reflect the following significant factors:

Ÿ  

The absence of impairment charges incurred in 2012 associated with certain merchant generating facilities;

Ÿ  

A return to normal weather in its electric utility operations;

Ÿ  

Construction and operation of growth projects in electric utility operations and associated rate adjustment clause revenue, as well as full-year earnings from gas transmission and gas distribution projects placed in service in 2012; and

Ÿ  

Growth in weather-normalized electric utility sales of approximately 2% resulting from the recovering economy and rising energy demand; partially offset by

Ÿ  

An increase in interest expense;

Ÿ  

Increases in certain operations and maintenance expense; and

Ÿ  

An increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization.

On January 2, 2013, U.S. federal legislation was enacted that provides an extension of the 50 percent bonus depreciation allowance for qualifying capital expenditures incurred through 2013, as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Dominion expects the bonus depreciation provisions to reduce income taxes otherwise payable, resulting in cash savings in 2013 and 2014 of approximately $250 million and $350 million, respectively.

 

 

36        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

 

SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Segment results include the impact of intersegment revenues and expenses, which may result in intersegment profit or loss. Presented below is a summary of contributions by Dominion’s operating segments to net income attributable to Dominion:

 

Year Ended December 31,   2012     2011     2010  
    

Net

Income
attributable
to
Dominion

    Diluted
EPS
   

Net

Income
attributable
to
Dominion

    Diluted
EPS
   

Net

Income
attributable
to
Dominion

    Diluted
EPS
 
(millions, except EPS)                                    

DVP

  $ 559      $ 0.98      $ 501      $ 0.87      $ 448      $ 0.76   

Dominion Generation

    874        1.52        968        1.68        1,263        2.14   

Dominion Energy

    551        0.96        521        0.91        475        0.80   

Primary operating segments

    1,984        3.46        1,990        3.46        2,186        3.70   

Corporate and Other

    (1,682     (2.93     (582     (1.01     622        1.06   

Consolidated

  $ 302      $ 0.53      $ 1,408      $ 2.45      $ 2,808      $ 4.76   

DVP

Presented below are operating statistics related to DVP’s operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012     % Change     2011     % Change     2010  

Electricity delivered (million MWh)

     80.8        (2 )%      82.3        (3 )%      84.5   

Degree days:

          

Cooling

     1,787        (6     1,899        (9     2,090   

Heating

     2,955        (12     3,354        (12     3,819   

Average electric distribution customer accounts (thousands)(1)

     2,455        1        2,438        1        2,422   

Average retail energy marketing customer accounts (thousands)(1)

     2,129        (1     2,152        6        2,037   

 

(1) Thirteen-month average.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting DVP’s net income contribution:

2012 VS. 2011

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
      Amount     EPS  
(millions, except EPS)             

Regulated electric sales:

    

Weather

   $ (34   $ (0.06

Other

     28        0.05   

FERC transmission equity return

     19        0.04   

Retail energy marketing operations

     35        0.06   

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

     14        0.03   

Other

     (4     (0.01

Change in net income contribution

   $ 58      $ 0.11   

 

(1) Excludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms in 2012 and 2011, which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.

2011 VS. 2010

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
      Amount     EPS  
(millions, except EPS)             

Regulated electric sales:

    

Weather

   $ (43   $ (0.07

Other

     10        0.02   

FERC transmission equity return

     44        0.07   

Retail energy marketing operations

     6        0.01   

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

     9        0.02   

Other operations and maintenance expense(2)

     28        0.04   

Other

     (1       

Share accretion

            0.02   

Change in net income contribution

   $ 53      $ 0.11   

 

(1) Excludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.
(2) Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.

Dominion Generation

Presented below are operating statistics related to Dominion Generation’s operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      % Change     2011      % Change     2010  

Electricity supplied (million MWh):

            

Utility

     80.8         (2 )%      82.3         (3 )%      84.5   

Merchant(1)

     41.4         (4     43.0         (9     47.3   

Degree days (electric utility service area):

            

Cooling

     1,787         (6     1,899         (9     2,090   

Heating

     2,955         (12     3,354         (12     3,819   

 

(1) Includes 13.2, 17.3, and 22.7 million MWh for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, related to Kewaunee, State Line, Salem Harbor, Brayton Point, Kincaid, and Dominion’s 50% interest in Elwood.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Generation’s net income contribution:

2012 VS. 2011

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
      Amount     EPS  
(millions, except EPS)             

Merchant generation margin

   $ (109   $ (0.19

Regulated electric sales:

    

Weather

     (78     (0.14

Other

     46        0.08   

Brayton Point, Kincaid and Elwood third and fourth quarter 2011 earnings(1)

     7        0.01   

Rate adjustment clause equity return

     17        0.03   

PJM ancillary services

     (27     (0.05

Net capacity expenses

     19        0.04   

Outage costs

     8        0.01   

Other

     23        0.05   

Change in net income contribution

   $ (94   $ (0.16

 

(1) Brayton Point’s, Kincaid’s and Elwood’s third and fourth quarter 2012 results of operations have been reflected in the Corporate and Other segment due to Dominion’s decision, in the third quarter of 2012, to pursue the sale of Brayton Point, Kincaid, and its 50% interest in Elwood.
 

 

37

 


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

2011 VS. 2010

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
      Amount     EPS  
(millions, except EPS)             

Merchant generation margin

   $ (278   $ (0.48

Regulated electric sales:

    

Weather

     (91     (0.16

Other

     59        0.10   

Rate adjustment clause equity return

     30        0.05   

Outage costs

     (11     (0.01

Other operations and maintenance expenses(1)

     72        0.13   

Depreciation and amortization

     (7     (0.01

Interest expense

     (18     (0.03

Kewaunee 2010 earnings(2)

     (19     (0.03

Other

     (32     (0.06

Share accretion

            0.04   

Change in net income contribution

   $ (295   $ (0.46

 

(1) Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.
(2) Kewaunee’s 2011 results of operations have been reflected in the Corporate and Other segment due to Dominion’s decision, in the first quarter of 2011, to pursue a sale of the power station. In 2012, Dominion decided to cease operations and begin decommissioning the facility in 2013.

Dominion Energy

Presented below are selected operating statistics related to Dominion Energy’s operations. As discussed in Note 3, in April 2010 Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations. As a result, production-related operating statistics for the Dominion Energy segment are no longer significant.

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      % Change     2011      % Change     2010  

Gas distribution throughput (bcf):

            

Sales

     26         (13 )%      30         (3 )%      31   

Transportation

     259         2        253         5        241   

Heating degree days

     4,986         (11     5,584         (2     5,682   

Average gas distribution customer accounts (thousands)(1):

            

Sales

     251         (2     256         (2     260   

Transportation

     1,044                1,040                1,042   

 

(1) Thirteen-month average.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Energy’s net income contribution:

2012 VS. 2011

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
      Amount     EPS  
(millions, except EPS)             

Weather

   $ (5   $ (0.01

Producer services margin

     (13     (0.02

Gas transmission margin(1)

     8        0.01   

Gain from sale of assets to Blue Racer

     43        0.08   

Other

     (3     (0.01

Change in net income contribution

   $ 30      $ 0.05   

 

(1) Primarily reflects placing the Appalachian Gateway Project into service.

2011 VS. 2010

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
      Amount     EPS  
(millions, except EPS)             

Producer services margin

   $ 18      $ 0.03   

Gas transmission margin(1)

     15        0.03   

Other operations and maintenance expenses(2)

     11        0.02   

Gas distribution margin:

    

AMR and PIR revenue

     9        0.02   

Base gas sales

     (4     (0.01

E&P disposed operations

     (17     (0.03

Other

     14        0.02   

Share accretion

            0.03   

Change in net income contribution

   $ 46      $ 0.11   

 

(1) Primarily reflects an increase in revenue from NGLs.
(2) Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.

Corporate and Other

Presented below are the Corporate and Other segment’s after-tax results:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012     2011     2010  
(millions, except EPS amounts)                   

Specific items attributable to operating segments

   $ (1,442   $ (340   $ 1,042   

Specific items attributable to Corporate and Other segment:

      

Peoples discontinued operations

                   (155

Other

     (5     29        (22

Total specific items

     (1,447     (311     865   

Other corporate operations

     (235     (271     (243

Total net benefit (expense)

   $ (1,682   $ (582   $ 622   

EPS impact

   $ (2.93   $ (1.01   $ 1.06   

TOTAL SPECIFIC ITEMS

Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s primary operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments. See Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of these items.

VIRGINIA POWER

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of Virginia Power’s consolidated results:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      $ Change      2011      $ Change     2010  
(millions)                                  

Net Income

   $ 1,050       $ 228       $ 822       $ (30   $ 852   

Overview

2012 VS. 2011

Net income increased by 28%. Favorable drivers include the absence of an impairment charge related to certain coal-fired

 

 

38        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

power stations recorded in 2011, the impact of rate adjustment clauses, and the absence of restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene recorded in 2011. Unfavorable drivers include the impact of less favorable weather and the restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms.

2011 VS. 2010

Net income decreased by 4%, primarily reflecting less favorable weather, including Hurricane Irene, and an impairment charge related to certain coal-fired power stations, partially offset by higher earnings from rate adjustment clauses and the absence of charges related to a workforce reduction program.

Analysis of Consolidated Operations

Presented below are selected amounts related to Virginia Power’s results of operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      $ Change     2011      $ Change     2010  
(millions)                                 

Operating Revenue

   $ 7,226       $ (20 )    $ 7,246       $ 27      $ 7,219   

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

     2,368         (138 )      2,506         11        2,495   

Purchased electric capacity

     386         (66 )      452         3        449   

Net Revenue

     4,472         184        4,288         13        4,275   

Other operations and maintenance

     1,466         (277 )      1,743         (2     1,745   

Depreciation and amortization

     782         64        718         47        671   

Other taxes

     232         10        222         4        218   

Other income

     96         8        88         (12     100   

Interest and related charges

     385         54        331         (16     347   

Income tax expense

     653         113        540         (2     542   

An analysis of Virginia Power’s results of operations follows:

2012 VS. 2011

Net Revenue increased 4%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($138 million);

Ÿ  

The absence of a charge recorded in 2011 based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million); and

Ÿ  

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($31 million); partially offset by

Ÿ  

The impact ($58 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in cooling and heating degree days ($184 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($126 million).

Other operations and maintenance decreased 16%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

The absence of an impairment charge recorded in 2011 related to certain coal-fired generating units ($228 million); and

Ÿ  

The absence of restoration costs recorded in 2011 associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene ($96 million); partially offset by

Ÿ  

A $64 million increase in storm damage and service restoration costs primarily due to the damage caused by severe storms in 2012.

Interest and related charges increased 16%, primarily due to the absence of the recognition of hedging gains into income in 2011, that had been deferred as regulatory liabilities, as a result of the Biennial Review Order.

Income tax expense increased 21%, primarily reflecting higher pre-tax income in 2012.

2011 VS. 2010

Net Revenue increased $13 million, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($169 million); and

Ÿ  

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($44 million); partially offset by

Ÿ  

The impact ($120 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in heating and cooling degree days ($220 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($100 million); and

Ÿ  

A decrease due to a charge based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million).

Other operations and maintenance decreased $2 million, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ  

A $267 million decrease in salaries, wages and benefits as well as certain administrative and general costs primarily due to a 2010 workforce reduction program; and

Ÿ  

A $54 million decrease in planned outage costs primarily due to fewer scheduled outage days at certain generation facilities; partially offset by

Ÿ  

A $228 million impairment charge related to certain coal-fired generating units; and

Ÿ  

A $96 million increase due to restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

Other income decreased 12%, primarily due to a decrease in the equity component of AFUDC ($17 million), partially offset by an increase in amounts collectible from customers for taxes in connection with contributions in aid of construction ($5 million).

Outlook

Virginia Power expects to provide growth in net income in 2013. Virginia Power’s anticipated 2013 results reflect the following significant factors:

Ÿ  

A return to normal weather;

Ÿ  

Growth in weather-normalized electric sales of approximately 2% resulting from the recovering economy and rising energy demand; and

Ÿ  

Construction and operation of growth projects and associated rate adjustment clause revenue; partially offset by

Ÿ  

Increases in certain operations and maintenance expense; and

Ÿ  

An increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization.

On January 2, 2013, U.S. federal legislation was enacted that provides an extension of the 50 percent bonus depreciation allowance for qualifying capital expenditures incurred through

2013, as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial

 

 

39

 


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

Statements. Virginia Power expects the bonus depreciation provisions to reduce income taxes otherwise payable, resulting in cash savings in 2013 and 2014 of approximately $200 million and $250 million, respectively.

SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of contributions by Virginia Power’s operating segments to net income:

 

Year Ended
December 31,
   2012     $ Change     2011     $ Change     2010  
(millions)                               

DVP

   $ 448      $ 22      $ 426      $ 49      $ 377   

Dominion Generation

     653        (11     664        34        630   

Primary operating segments

     1,101        11        1,090        83        1,007   

Corporate and Other

     (51     217        (268     (113     (155

Consolidated

   $ 1,050      $ 228      $ 822      $ (30   $ 852   

DVP

Presented below are operating statistics related to Virginia Power’s DVP segment:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      % Change     2011      % Change     2010  

Electricity delivered (million MWh)

     80.8         (2 )%      82.3         (3 )%      84.5   

Degree days (electric service area):

            

Cooling

     1,787         (6     1,899         (9     2,090   

Heating

     2,955         (12     3,354         (12     3,819   

Average electric distribution customer accounts (thousands)(1)

     2,455         1        2,438         1        2,422   

 

(1) Thirteen-month average.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting DVP’s net income contribution:

2012 VS. 2011

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
(millions, except EPS)       

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

   $ (34

Other

     28   

FERC transmission equity return

     19   

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

     14   

Other

     (5

Change in net income contribution

   $ 22   

 

(1) Excludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms in 2012 and 2011, which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.

2011 VS. 2010

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
(millions)       

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

   $ (43

Other

     10   

FERC transmission equity return

     44   

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

     9   

Other operations and maintenance expense(2)

     28   

Other

     1   

Change in net income contribution

   $ 49   

 

(1) Excludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.
(2) Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.

Dominion Generation

Presented below are operating statistics related to Virginia Power’s Dominion Generation segment:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012      % Change     2011      % Change     2010  

Electricity supplied (million MWh)

     80.8         (2 )%      82.3         (3 )%      84.5   

Degree days (electric service area):

            

Cooling

     1,787         (6     1,899         (9     2,090   

Heating

     2,955         (12     3,354         (12     3,819   

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Generation’s net income contribution:

2012 VS. 2011

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
(millions)       

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

   $ (78

Other

     46   

Rate adjustment clause equity return

     17   

PJM ancillary services

     (27

Net capacity expenses

     19   

Other

     12   

Change in net income contribution

   $ (11

2011 VS. 2010

 

      Increase (Decrease)  
(millions)       

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

   $ (91

Other

     59   

Rate adjustment clause equity return

     30   

Outage costs

     33   

Other

     3   

Change in net income contribution

   $ 34   
 

 

40        

 


Table of Contents

 

 

Corporate and Other

Presented below are the Corporate and Other segment’s after-tax results:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012     2011     2010  
(millions)                   

Specific items attributable to operating segments

   $ (51   $ (268   $ (153

Other corporate operations

                   (2

Total net expense

   $ (51   $ (268   $ (155

SPECIFIC ITEMS ATTRIBUTABLE TO OPERATING SEGMENTS

Corporate and Other primarily includes specific items attributable to Virginia Power’s primary operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments. See Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of these items.

SELECTED INFORMATION—ENERGY TRADING ACTIVITIES

Dominion engages in energy trading, marketing and hedging activities to complement its businesses and facilitate its price risk management activities. As part of these operations, Dominion enters into contracts for purchases and sales of energy-related commodities, including electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products. Settlements of contracts may require physical delivery of the underlying commodity or cash settlement. Dominion also enters into contracts with the objective of benefiting from changes in prices. For example, after entering into a contract to purchase a commodity, Dominion typically enters into a sales contract, or a combination of sales contracts, with quantities and delivery or settlement terms that are identical or very similar to those of the purchase contract. When the purchase and sales contracts are settled either by physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by net cash settlement, Dominion may receive a net cash margin (a realized gain), or may pay a net cash margin (a realized loss). Dominion continually monitors its contract positions, considering location and timing of delivery or settlement for each energy commodity in relation to market price activity.

A summary of the changes in the unrealized gains and losses recognized for Dominion’s energy-related derivative instruments held for trading purposes follows:

 

      Amount  
(millions)       

Net unrealized gain at December 31, 2011

   $ 20   

Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period

     3   

Change in unrealized gains and losses

     55   

Net unrealized gain at December 31, 2012

   $ 78   

The balance of net unrealized gains and losses recognized for Dominion’s energy-related derivative instruments held for trading purposes at December 31, 2012, is summarized in the following table based on the approach used to determine fair value:

 

      Maturity Based on Contract Settlement or Delivery Date(s)  
Sources of Fair Value    2013      2014—2015     2016—2017     2018
and
thereafter
     Total  
(millions)                                 

Prices actively quoted—Level 1(1)

   $       $      $      $       $   

Prices provided by other external sources—Level 2(2)

     59         26        2                87   

Prices based on models and other valuation methods—Level 3(3)

     1         (6     (4             (9

Total

   $ 60       $ 20      $ (2   $       $ 78   

 

(1) Values represent observable unadjusted quoted prices for traded instruments in active markets.
(2) Values with inputs that are observable directly or indirectly for the instrument, but do not qualify for Level 1.
(3) Values with a significant amount of inputs that are not observable for the instrument.

 

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Dominion and Virginia Power depend on both internal and external sources of liquidity to provide working capital and as a bridge to long-term debt financings. Short-term cash requirements not met by cash provided by operations are generally satisfied with proceeds from short-term borrowings. Long-term cash needs are met through issuances of debt and/or equity securities.

At December 31, 2012, Dominion had $1.1 billion of unused capacity under its credit facilities, including $256 million of unused capacity under joint credit facilities available to Virginia Power. See additional discussion under Credit Facilities and Short-Term Debt.

The disposition of certain merchant generation facilities during 2012 and the expected sale or decommissioning of certain other merchant generation facilities in 2013 are not expected to negatively impact Dominion’s liquidity.

A summary of Dominion’s cash flows is presented below:

 

Year Ended December 31,    2012     2011     2010  
(millions)                   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   $ 102      $ 62      $ 50   

Cash flows provided by (used in):

      

Operating activities

     4,137        2,983        1,825